The URL can be used to link to this page

12-27-79 agenda ., ;` ~~ /~ L CITY. QF RtCHFIELD,'MINNESOTA ,~ . Office of City:.: Manager Council Letter No. 412 ~~ Agenda December 27, 197E; -The Honoi`able Mayor ' and - . iVi~mbers of the City Council ;_ City of Richfield Gentlemen: ,. ' Subject: Resolution Authorizing Temporary Loan From Public Improvement Revolving ~; Fund to City Project No. 7GS At the November 30, .1976 special council meeting, the council • _ held a hearing and ordered in the' Public ?mprovements for the I/~-?/N redevelopment, Special Assessment Project No. 705. However, be- fore actual construction begins in 1977, and the permanent funding costs to the project i i it ill b il bl i h . ncurr ng y .w e e c s ava a e, t ' The Public Improvement Revolving Fund was established to advance monies -for local improvement projects which will be spec- • ' Tally assessed. Attached to this. council letter is a resolution authorizing an advance of $50, 000 from the Public Improvement Revolving Fund to enable the project to paycurrent obligations. As right-of-way negotiations and acquisitions proceed in the next few months, additional requests for advances. may be brought to the council. It is recommended that the council approve the resolution providing the first advance of monies to City Project No. 705. Res ctfully su fitted, ,~ '' ~ ~' • Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja ~~ ._ . cc: Finance Director RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LOAN FROM PERMANENT Ii~Il'ROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND TO CITY PROJECT NUMBER 705 WHEREAS, Resolutions Numbers-5645 anal 5646 ordered City Project; Number 705, a special assessment project providing acquisition of land for public right~of~way and permanent street impra~ve!-nents for the, Lyrldale/Hub/Nicoll:et reclt~velopment project area, ,and 1~fL3.E'P.EIaL}, f:hc~ Per~lanellt: I;npr~iv{are.=~~i: ~R~~vo3:via-~g I`~.1~ :.t ~~'s.s es~:abl:~.sb.ed io ~,:°u ~.;.ci.e .~:srst7o,~a»y f'i,n~ii.cing L•o sp...~~.a~. ~!sse~ssc:lc:°li~ p~°ojec~~~ u.nt:-{.1. pe~:imarae~;.r firs. ~~ illg ar:cangcl-slerlts caxl bc~ coi~,nlet.edg and WH{ ~ S, it has been determined necessary to provide a temporary loan i:n the amount of $50,-000. to provide funds to pay outstanding obligaL-ions incurred to date. NOt~], THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of R:i.ch~~ield., Minr,.r.sota, as follows: J_. A. Z:r~T''-:1702:;"ry J.~u7~. O'ff' ~i5~),~~0 fi"CYlY! the P2i:°?7.'11B_i'!`. TSii71:7';7~tellt P.ev+:~ ~vi.l;.g Funcl E.o Ci i'.y 1'roj ct Nui,.7,oa= 705 is hereby ~luthc7rized as of D~cc.Lrl7cr 1, 1976. ?_. All such money so furnisl-led sha3.l be restored k~hen and as sufficient moneys .are received in City Project Nvxnber 705,. with interest at the rate of five percent per ar_num, Passed. by the City Cou2~ci1 of the City of R~_cl-lfield 1:his 27th day of Dic~:,:tber, 197b. . Tloren L. Law Mayor ATTrST: Thc-rinas J. Moran _ City Clerk C~ ,, .:. - CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~ Council Letter No. 4.11- i ti Agenda December 2 7 , 19 76 The Honorable Mayor and .Members of the City .Council City, of Richfield - G~ntTemen: , Subject: Sale of City Owned Property bn September 22, I975, the city council adopted anordinance providing ` for. the sale or..other disposition of certain lots in New Ford Town Addition (copy attached) . Council members may recall that these Lots have since been designated for inclusion. in the New .Homes Program of the HRA, through an agreement with the HRA. In October 1976, the HRA authorised staff to accept bids from nearby property owners for the sale of three of these city owned lots , These three ,.lots are not suitable for development under the New Homes Program because. they are not serviced by streets, sewer or water, and because they are irnmedia.tely adjacent to the airport property, facing the southwest airport runway , The planning director in earpy November contacted all property owners in the New Ford Town area, notifying them that the properties were for sale and requesting them to submit bids for purchase of the lots . Two bids were submitted .for purchase of the Tots , Two 1?ids were submitted for purchase of, the three lots as follows: Lot Appraised Value #23 $869,00 #21 $678.00 Bidder D. Whipps 6405 Standish F. Rogers 6413 Standish #24 ~ $869.00 No bids received Bid $890.00 $678,00 11 L r -,, Council Letter No. 411 ' -2- December 27, -1976 i • The bids-submitted ;correspond with the appraised value of the two properties. - Since the city-.has previously authorized the sale of the-lots, and since the bids submitted do correspond with the appraised value,..: it is recommended-that the city council authorizethe sale. of -the lots as follows: ` - ~_ Lot #23 to Mr, D. Whipps, in~the amount of $890.00, and Lot #k21 to II Mr. F . Rogers , in the amount of $ 67 8.0.0. Respectfully submitted, .1~~~ i Wayne S. Burggraaff . CitylVianager WSB/bll ~ ~~~ ~~ ~e~e ' d~ ~ ec~s ~'"~' ~ G~„ 1~'~ tI APPENDIX A TRANSITORY ORDINANCES °.,so .' .. ~ • . ORDTNANCE N0. 16.3~F. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF PiONEY FROM TIIE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR, CERTATN CAPITAL II`iPRCVEMENTS . ' • ; . •. City :of Richfield does ordain; ,`, '. '. • Section 1. It is found and deir~.-mined to be necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for landscaping and underground sprinkling systems at certain public buildings such as city h-all and the Cedar Avenue liquor store and other public properties, such expend- iture being fora capital improvement for ~•..*hich .the -city would be authorized to,issue,general obligation bonds. ,: ~ ,. r~c~ir?i~ 2, 1'h~ expenditure of $20,000 from-such Special Revenue Fund for . ~s~.~c1~z purpose' is hereby authorized pursuant .to provisions of Secti.c~n 7.1~, - Sub division (2) .of the ciL-y: charter. :. ' - ~ ~ ~ SECti.a~ 3._ The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to cap~,i:al~improveraents budget appropriations heretpfore made and. pursuant to cor;tracts authorized from time L-o time hereafter by council- resolution. 73111 PdD. 1975-14 (8/11/75) - .. ORDINANCE N0. 16.35.. AN ORDIA'ANCE PROVIDING FOR THE SALE- OR OTi~R DISPOSITION OF CER'.CAIN LOTS IN NEtJ FORD TOZ1N ADDITION. ~ - - ' +G3.ty ~o~'~ Richfield does ordain; . .. . _ ... ' - ' ~ _ . Sect>on 1. The following described lots in I?ew Ford To~•rr. addition are hereby authorized to be sold ar-otherwise disposed of by the city as herein provided; ~~.~ Lots S; 6, 7, 8 and 9 in Block S .. __ ~, • ~- ~ ... ~ . . . _ ~ L,ots 8, 19 and 23 in Block 6 . .. .. _ ~, . I,ot; 5 :in Block 7 ....: . Loi 4 in Block 13 ~ .. -. . • ,: .. ., Sots ~, 2I, 23 and 24 in Block 14. ~._~ - ~ '' ;. ~OL'u 8, 16. and l7 in Block 19 ~ - ~ - .. Sect_i,on ~?_ . ~~ .Such lots, or any of .them, .n:a}T tram time to time be sold by the cif:y rursuant to and in accordance faith resolutions adapted by the city counci.I. As an alternative, the city council may, from time to time, by resolution authorize the transfer of such lots, or any of .them, to the Housing and iZedevelopment Authority-of the City of Richfield to be sold by such ' Aui:}~ority pursuant to and in accordance tvi.t:h resolutions adopted by the board of cor~~.rnissioners of. such Authority. Bill No, 197517 (9/22/75) ~ ' I O;~Dti`Il~NCE CODE ~;,_ • • . , • ,19 (9/?_2f75) ClTI' OF RlCi~EIEI.D, 11~{INN=~')'~. ..-,. t er 3, 1976 The City of Richfield presently owns three. lots in the New Ford Town Addition of east Richfield which are now available for sale. The parcels are as follows: 1. 6414 - 23rd Avenue South, or specifically Lot 21, Block I4, New Ford Town Addition. This-lot measures 50 feet by 135.60 feet or 6,780 square feet. 2. 2215 East 64th Street, specifically Lot 23, Block 14, New Ford Town Addition. This parcel measures 50 feet by. 135.60 feet or 6,780 square feet. 3. Lot 24, Block I4, New Ford Town Addition. This lot measures 50 feet by 135.60 feet or 6,780 square feet. Bids will be accepted on all parcels for amounts which equal or exceed the appraised market values of $678., $869 and $869, respectively. Inquiries and sealed bids may be addressed to: .City of Richfield Planning Department '6700 Portland Avenue South . Richfield, MN 55423 Lot 22, Block 14 is for sale from Hennepin Caunty. The sale price on the 6,780 square foot lot is $669.50. Offers to purchase should be addressed to: Hennepin County Finance Department Government Center - Room 606A Minneapolis, MN 55487 Attention: Tax Forfeited Land Case 84-14 Respectfully, ~~ ~ ~~~- Richard C. Krier Planning and Development Director City of-.Richfield tetephon~:863-7521 (612) an equal oppartunity employer EQUAL NOUSIR+h OPPORT~IVITY -~ O r • oo ~ ~ d" O ~' J I'~ W M •IJ U LL') (~ d' r d C1. C1. `~ I• • O V S- Gn O Z N f- ~ W ~i-~ LL' S= •t3 ~ G~ N S= N C~ S.. tt3 •r d Nrr 4- N O N 4- > tZ •r O ~ LL' Tf i N W C'3 S= Z 4- S= ~ •r (~ •r O N E ~.' W Z O e S- 7 n O tts O L~... LL. s O N GJ O O N N ~ to d W ~ ~ D S- g M d N 1 M M l0 O O O ~ O O ~ ~ O ~ O O ~ O O O O O O lt] ` G.t~ d' ~ I~ - ~ lfl ~ d' M N O Ol 00 I~ l0 M N r O M M M M Ct' d' d' d' GI' d' M M M M M M M M Lf) Ln LI1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M t .fr •N .I..t ~ O O O N N N C O ~ O O _.J ~ C S= O 5= O > O > •2 to d •r -p S- "C3 S- S- S.. M rtY t'7 N v N 1 I tO O OO M N N M mot' ef' t~ c1' t0 S.. i O N i-~ -f-> f~S iCS 3 3 N N II1 a1 "C3 "C3 W W N N e-1 ri cfl ~o Ls7 Liz .I.) O O N N O C O N O ? cC d .1 •C7 C ~ O (Cf N r •r ~ Sr i S- O rt5 Cl. C'S O O O N n d' lfl CF' i. O •r Y r W 1 .~ N O .O S/ --a O N N r V Sv C O N ~ ~ V1 i. N C N O S= "d O S- ~ O Ul N VI i. i- In G O E r N f~ N L7') O O S= VI fl- r-i •r O N O 'C3 T3 ~ N "O •r i/ fCS Q' -1--~ !~. C S- ~ -N +~ r r C S- ~ 4- O U S. •r •r S- (n rtS (6 O 41 •r' O C'S s N ~ s O ~ rt3 C.~3 O «f U' (O C~3 (Cf ~ r N r N • '•r 4- i O •r 4- S.. O J • 7 N 4J +~ • 7 U •r GL' ••- S.. S_ ~ ~ rtS ~ 3 .X U 0- r its 3 '- Y • W d Z Z •--~ r 4- CJ3 ~ •r •r U l.t_ l.L • S` O N O t S.. V 'C3 r O RS. d r O RS Q C rt3 S- I.L O Cn O LL' E ~ O I- ~ ~ O t- S= O '7 O O ~ +~ S- OJ m i Rf .S/ U s U •r ~ `~ .I.~ •r U W • tL O E •r i- '~ 41 S.. li RS C •r I.i ~ S` O O C ~ rt3 3 s s s s s s s .~ s .~ s ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O O (n N O O O O O N In (n . (n to N N to N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O > > N N N N O > > > > > > > > > O ~ d d ~ ~ O ~ O d d d d d d d d d C C C s` O O O N N ..C s N N N N N .C s s s s s -O -O s > > N (n > > > > ~ to to In to to M fn fn (n d d •r •r d d d d d •r •r •r •r •r •r •r •r •r -p 'p •O 'C3 Tf 'p •a b 'd 'L7 'L7 'd T3 C Sr '~ '~ "d "C7 "C3 C O O C S` O sr s= S= ~ i rtS rt S` S` S- i. S- cts rtf ~ rd rts of rts rtS rtf N N to N N N N N N N to N N to (n N to N i i 1 1 1 I 1 CO O ct' I~ cY 00 N Cp ¢t l.f) i~ M Ql 1.C) M Ol tt) r M d' d' r N N M M ch d' M M N N r1 O O O M M M ch d" d' ~' d' d' d' d• d' cf• ~' d' J' d' d' l0 l0 l0 l0 lfl l0 l0 lfl lp lp l0 O l0 lfl l0 CO lp lfl r-•--- o o~ ~_ ~~ ~ @ .}.~ c RS C r-" d v N to W ~Z-~ a O LD d1 C~ S- cC N 4-- N k- •r ~' 'O W Z 3 •r O W Z 3 O t/1 N W GY. G C a 0 0 0 0 0 0 M N ri O Ol 00 M M M M N N LL') In l.[1 l.f) tS7 ~ •{~ i •}~ M to Q M ~~ r ~ O •r '~ 1[5 ~ r ~ C'3 Q (CS ~ Y N O M C .--i Q N i C O O O C {~ to c~ r- C i. U RS c,3 •r O d U RS N S- N 'r' • O N C1. • r '7 •r > J RS N ~--~ . 3 O ~ ~ ~ O J • O L ---~ +~ S.. ~ t0 O C ~ .~ N • d ~ N J N 1G Q 3 ~ t ~ t ~ t O O O ~ O O O O O O O O N M N N N N N N O O O Q1 > > > > > > Q Q Q d Q Q .C .~ .O .~ .~ t ~ N N V1 V1 Vl •r •r •r •r •r •r "CS "C1 'C3 ZT3 T3 "CS C C O ~ O ~ O ~ rCS (Cf (Cf R3 N N N N N N t.C) r1 ~ M Ql Ln ~ ~ M M N N M M (~'M M M M l~ lS? lfl li) lU lfl 1 ~~ ~.~ ~,~~ ~ ~ ~ w n~ 1 (. _ /__ - L. ' ~ _ CITY OF RICHFIELD,"1VIINNESOTA :Office of City Manager council' Letter No. 410' '~ _ Agenda' December 2 7 , 19 7.6... . _ ,: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ City of Richfield. ' Gentlemen• Subject; Minutes!, Tabulation of-Bids and Award of :Contract, . Worker's Compensation Insurance ,, ~ Ori~December 27, 1976, in accordance with previous city council ;,: authorization, the city manager opened bids for a new worker's compensation insurance .contract. The .public safety director, planning director,.. and park- and recreation director also represented the city at the .bid opening... The bid opening minutes and the tabulation of the bids are attached for city council review. The specifications included a base bid for a three year contract and an alternate bid for aone-year contract, Only one bid was received from Casey and 'Casey,, Inc.', representing the U.S. Fidelity and Guarantee Company. The bidder submitted a bid for the alternate, one-year contract'. The standard premium, including the city's current modification factor of 1.10, .i s in the amount of $121, 475. The premium discount, to be deducted at the time of invoicing,: is guaranteed in the amount of $17, 857, The total. net estimated premium is $103, 618. - The city has! paid $96, 369 for .vuorker's compensation insurance coverage during 1976. This premium will be adjusted, after the end of the year, based on the -actual loss ratio during the year.. However, losses during 1976 have been _ high,- and it is not anticipated that the city will receive any dividend rebates - against the 1976; premium. . In comparison, the bid received for worker's compensation insurance during 1977 is for a premium of $103, 618.. This premium is based on the current 19.76 city payroll, and includes increased benefit payments mandated by the State .. Department of Insurance. The 1977 premium bid is approximately 7.5% higher than the 19 7 6 premium paid . .. I ~. \ ,: ,~ f ~ -I ,. .Council Letter No. 410 -2- Agenda December 27, 1976 ~. ~~ + •ic ho de s A ~a 1 r r ee om an .has an 1 The U.S;_Fidelity.arid Gua.ant. C p y A Y rating and an AAAAA financial rating according. to Best's Insurance Guide. The company ~as,pr~ovded worker) s r~ompensation and liability coverage for governmental units in the past, and currently is the writer for the liability insurance package for Richfield's amateur athletic organizations. ~ ~ i It is recommended that the city council approve the bid of Casey and Casey, it I~c:•, for U.S. Fidelity and Guarantee Company, •for a one-year worker's compensa ion insurance contract. ~ - R' ctfully s/~m~,~ted, ~~ ~'"`` ~`'" . Q Wayne S . Burggraaff City Manager ~, cc: Administrative Assistant Finance Director • ', ~, ~. C ,~ ~~ • CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid. Qpening December 27, 1976 Workmen's Compensation Insurance Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Admin- istrative.staff was called by Wayne. S. Burggraaff, City Manager, who announced th at the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids on Workmen's Compensation Insurance as advertised in the official newspaper on November 24, 1976. Present: Wayne S. Burggraaff, City Manager Joyce Wilde, Administrative Assistant Richard Krier, Planning Director James Lacina, Personnel Director Frank Boyles, Administrative Aide Don Fondrick, .Parks & Recreation Director Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director Marianne Price., Deputy. Clerk • The following bid was submitted and read aloud: Total Estimated Premium Premium Less Ex- Discount perience Mod- Less. at Time Premium Bidder ification Less Prem. Total Net Ratio of In- Discount Bid Security Base Bid Alternate A Discount Premium Dividend voicing.•Guaranteed Casey & Casey Inc. 30% $25,966 $5,000 Bond 40% $18,586 U. S. Fidelity 50%.$11,176 & Guarantee No Bid $121,475 $17,857 $103,618 60% $ 3,766 Yes Yes The City Manager announced that the bid would be tabulated and considered at the regular council meeting of December 27, 1976. Thomas J. Moran City Clerk a m n :v." (D n (D d rt r- O C~ d • ~ .; - ~ ~ , ~ ., ,, .,, ' i ~ n , . a N Cf~ fD . • ~ N ~ .. ~ .~ ~ ~ wG m C~ a. ~~ n vs ~ ''C (D ~ N ~ ~ C'] ~b ~ n ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt ~ ~ a (D O ~ O . O o O ~ ~d ! ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,r~ N• SD O (t ~ fl ~ ~' ~ CV W N ?~ ~ ~~;; ~ ~ Z ~ rr N "~ w " ~ ° gy ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~- a ti~ `~ • ( p (D nl ~ ~ ~• ~' fJ rt ~ Tj ~ b ~A v ~ K N• F'• :s Ui n N :+ rt n • N p. O rd r t a~ w~ ~w c - N - ~J {/? ~ r ~, V ~ Y• ~ ~ V b . . },,, to n O C • - ~ . rt `, ~ ~ pr's R; . C r a ~G ~~ n N < <~ . --+ o F= r cif i :r c~3 0 H C7 f': ~ t-i • • O O C ~ ~7 ~. d w~~ M O ri ter,' YOC :y' ~ N br7' -: ~ C x' ~ in o N C3 C J to ~ ~'~ ~ N '~~., C ~ b t' ~ ~ ~ N v N J t ~~ ~ - (`'r I CITY OF RICHFIELD; ; (~NiINNESOTA '~~ ffce of Ct Mana er O Y g ,x Council Letter No. 409 _. \' Agerida December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor ' and Members of the :City Council City of Richfield Gentl~men• , 5ublect: ,Liquor. License Renewals for Niel~'Minotte's, Inc. At the November 22 , 1976. city council meeting, the city councia set December 3, 1976 as the date for a public hearing on the re uest for the on- sale and Sunday. liquor licenses for Nick Minotte's, Inc.. 7,00 West 6.6th S,treet,~ $ecause the applicant was unable. to complete all of the application requiremezlts by that date, the public hearing on the liquor license was continued to December-- - 27,.1976. The application for this license was submitted by Mr. Nick. Minotte and Nlr. Matthew Bohar. Although the application was not completely submitted within. the. prescribed. time limit, all of the required information, including a surety bond, insurance certification, political contribution certification, and license fees have now been filed. The present on-sale and Sunday liquor license for Minotte's, Inc. will expire December 31, -1976. The renewal .application is for the second full year renewal by the present owners. ~,ppliration Inve~t3:gation In accordance with city ordinance,. the public safety department did make ari investigation of information required by Section 11 .06, subdivision 4 of the on-sale liquor. ordinance, The public safety department report indicates that there has been no change in the corporate structure in the past year. The restaurant does have a new manager, however. The application lists Mrs. Kevin ~Iill;- 1625 W. 75th Street, Council Letter No. 409 -2-.~ December 27, 1916 ~: _ 1 l ; r as the new manager'. Because of time d~ys in completing the .application,. ~, the Public Safety Department has not yet been able to complete its investi- gation of the new manager.- No ordinance violations h v been: o ae recrdedaaist e ih g n th establ s ment 'within the''past ":year.. During the year; there were three reported police incidents indicating that the request for police service is clearly not excess- ive . Accountant's Report The on-s~lc liquor ordinance requires that the applicant file .with the city clerk a statement made by a certified public accountant which shows t;e total gross sales and the total food sales of the restaurant for the pre- ceding 12 month period. The application shows 'the follciwng information for the l? months.~nd:inc; August, 1.976, which was;the applicant's first fu1T year operation of the establishment. Total .Sales $996_, 531.96 Food Sales 404,098.69 Percent of Food Sales 40.5 ' _ to Total Percent of Liquor Sales 49.5 • to Tot~1 The purpose for obtaining this information is that state statutes requires the serving of food to be a principal part of the business of a restaurant which • has an on-sale liquor license. Council members will recall that originally the ` city ordinance included a definition of the phrase "principal part of 'the business" stating that more than 50% of the gross retail sales of licensed premuses must be derived from the sale of food. That definition was deleted in 1911 leaving only the statutory requirement which does not incluae a definition of the phrase. l The city attorney has advised that "principal part of the business" may be interpreted to refer to percent of gross sales, but also to such things as the amount of investment necessary to serve food compared to the serving of - beverages; or the number of employees engaged in the preparation and serving of foods compared with beverages; or the amount of space provided for the preparation and serving of food as compared with beverages. In short, the state statute could be defined in a number of ways and in no way infers that the defin- ition must be limited to percent of gross retail, sales. Flealth and Safety Regulations I The Environmental Health_Department has inspected the applicant's premises ,~ several times over the past year and one-half. The applicant has completed some ~~. Council Letter No. 409 -3- December 27, 1976 ;_ , major improvements during that 'time although there still exist on-going. ~~ problems with housekeeping,. storage of materials, lighting and building maintenance. The most recent inspection of the property on December 22, I, 1976, revealed numerous, violations of environmental health and -safety codes. In addition,' the applicant was issued a citation during 1976 for not properly handling garbage. Outside property maintenance- has also been inadequate: and the `health department has cut the weeds on the property .twice and assessed the cost against the property. Off-Street Parking Contract Provisions . T'he original off-street .parking :contract for the Heidelberg"Dining Lounge, Inc, i:hen 1QCatcd at 708 W. 66th Street; was approved by the city council on July 2~, 1;970. The performance bond required as a condition of the off-street - }parking contract req~.iired nurrierous improvements, `most of which have been completed. As the council will recall, the stipulations for iandscapin~g and; sidewalk improvernents~were waived due to the fact that the Lyndale/Hub/ _ Nicollet project could require changes. The final council required improvement which was not completed was the removal of the roof billboard.. The billboard advertising sign was to be removed on or about March 31 , 1974, but is still on the roof of the building. The council stipulation that the billboard advertising sign on the roof be removed occurred., of course, before Minotte became involved with the restaurant. However, during 'i the public hearing for the ,liquor license for 1976, the. applicant advised .the city that he was willing to remove the sign and had; in fact, contacted 1Vaegele Outdoor Advertising Company of his intent to do so. The sign has not yet been removed. ~ Miscellaneous Information The applicant has not filed the necessary political contribution declarations, i3ut indicates that neither of the ovaners have made political contributions during the past. year. The city assessor reports that tle following information concern- ing market value and taxes paid reflect that data as it appears on city records: 12 Mos . Ending 12 Mos . Ending October 31; 19 7 5 October 31 , 19 7 6 Market.Value $520,000.00 $550;000.00 Taxes Paid. $ 24,799.40 $ 24;153.58 Recommendation ' It is recommended that the application for renewal of the on-sale liquor and Sunday .liquor ..licenses .for, Nick Minotte's Inc.. be .granted subject to the Council Letter No. 409 -:~- December 27, 19.76. ;' follow' in rov' io is ns• g p 1 That the required environmental heal h corrections ~be completed prior to-December 31, `1976, 2 That the cit mana er review and`a ~` Y g pprove the po ice report on the new managerprior `to December 31, 1976. des ectfull submitted P Y , ~ ;~ ~yl~e ~.• ~iurggraaff Y Ca~~ ~anag~:r ~IST3/eja - cc' Public Safety T~r~ctor City Clerk Environmental. Health- Director r ,t CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office- of City-Manager Council Letter N`o: .4:08 . Agenda``December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor and: Members of the City Gouncii City of Richfield Gentlemen• Subject; Final 1976 Revision for Departmental Budget Appropriations The purpose of this council. letter is to submit the annual resolution provid- ing for the final revision of the departmzntai budget 'appropriations. Section 7.07 of the City Charter provides. that upon request of the city, manager, the city council may approve departmental budget appropriation revisions within the general fund appropriation. during the last three months _ of the year to insure that departmental expenditures do not exceed appropriations. ~ In accordance with this charter provision, we have completed a final review of the 1976 -budget, and barring any unexpected emergencies during the last few days of -the year, have prepared a budget transfer resolution which .provides adequate appropriations to cover all anticipated departmental expenditures. •. The proposed transfer resolution is attached.. You will note that the total anticipated expenditures for 1976 are unchanged and remain at the limit esfiab- fished by the city council in October. The transfers .in the case of a few departmental operations are required to meet anticipated expenditure levels. It is recommended that the resolution be adopted. Respectfully submitted, ,. - - ~. ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager ' ~ RESOLUTION NO. i I~ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISIONS.OF 1976 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS AND TRANSFER OF CONTINGENCY FUNDS. WHEREAS, Resolutions Numbers 5420 and 5591 appropriated funds for personal services, other expenses and-capital outlays for each department of the City .for the year 1976, and WHEREAS, the City Charter, Chapter 7, Section 7.09 gives the council authority to transfer unencumbered appropriation balances from. one office, department or agency to another within the same fund at the request. of the C.if:y Manager, and WHEREAS, the City Manager has requeilted a revision of the 1976 budget appropriations in accordance with Chartez• revisi.~ns. NC)~W, '!"1-IEREFOIZE, BF. IT R} SOLVED ley tllo City Council. of the City o~ Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1 . That the ].976 appropriations for eacl3 department of the general fund be revised as follovas: GENERAL FUND Mayor-Council Executive Finance I-Iea lth Legal Public Works AMOUNT $ 782 Increa se 782 Decrease 2,236 Increase 3, 889 Increase 4, 800 Decrease 1,3?.5 Decrease .- Tata l G°nera l Fund 0 2. That there is rieroby authorised a transfer in the amount of $31, 000 from the 1976 contingency to a reserve for remaining 1976 compensation settlements. 3. That the City Manager and the Finance Director bring into effect the provisions of this resolution:. Passed by the City Council of the City of P.ichfield this 27th day. of December, 1976. ATTEST: horny Loren L. Law MAYOP. p .^ 3~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . , Office of City Manager. Council-Letter No. 407 Agenda December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor and . Members of the City Council City of Richfield `.. Gentlemen• Subject: Off-Street' Parking - 1302 East 66th Street 'If the city council approves .the request for a variance to permit con- struction of an office building at 130.2 Ea t 66 h Street; it will be necessary. to execute ari off-street parking contract. Mr. George Mauer. of the George C. Mauer Construction Company is requesting approval of such an off- street parking contract. The attached sketch indicates the .layout for the existing-,building and - proposed off-street parking. The amount of square feet in the proposed .building and the type of use requires that the building have. twelve off-street parking spaces. Thirteen parking .spaces are proposed by the applicant. This includes parking spaces. for three employees and ten. customers If the off-street. parking contract is considered, it is recommended that approval of the contract be subject to the following stipulations: ' 1. Grada.ng and drainage plan to be approved by the department of public works 2. Landscaping and lighting plans to be approved by city staff. • ~ (~ ~ Respectfully submitt~ j ,v Wayne S. Burggraaff • City Manager WSB/eja cc: :.Director pf Pu::blic :Works l'ianning Director 3tf~~ -~- - 30'- ----- - E-- 20'-- _._. _ Rustic . woody--~ -m sign J) T6" ---20'-~~24'--~--- Y V ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o, ,~Blocktop c 'a 0 N a c O JJ .1' ~ - _~ .~ ~~ BARhIT,R CURB avt. 12 ~. ~(ondscapin ~ ~ri~~ ~ o PROPOSED 3I ~ BLDG. N it 131' OFF-STREET PARKING r~o. 76-8 OWNER AI3D ADDRESS: George C. Maurer Construction, Inc. 6625 Tyndale Avenue South Richfield, Pdinnesota 55+23 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 11, Block k, Rich Highlands Addition 1302 Eaat 66th Street USE: Office Building DATE OF ApYLICATION: December 17, 1976 COUNCIL ACTION: December 27, 1976 N0. PARKING SPAC::S: 13 ~ I Blacktop _~ m N g-- N ~ Scale I"= 20' E. S. 12/21/76 /. CITY OF RICHFIELD; MINNESOTA Office of City Manager- Council Letter No. 406 Agenda December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor ~azd Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Temporary. Sign Permit, 7601 Lyndale Aversue On the December 27, 1976 city` council agenda there is a request from the :Suburban Sigri Co. to install a temporary sign for a period. of 60 days at T601 Lyndale 'Avenue.. =The.. staff has reviewed the application and recommends the denial of the application for the'foll.owing reasons: • 1, Communication Center, 7601 Lyndale Avenue currently has a permanent sign. 2. The proposed location of the temporary .sign may, cause site obstructions for traffic in the 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue intersection. 3. The proposed location of the temporary sign will necessitate parking lot traffic moving over the electricalconduit. Respectfully sub 'tied, • ~..,.~ , ~~~ • ~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager ~i~ar~~~ s l G~ y 6 0 'r~~ ~~ .CITY OF RICHFIELD r r: . PLJRLIC ''?ORK.S DEPARTi~ENT ~ PROTECTIVE IN ~PECTION Dh,ISION ~~ APPLICATION FOR OlJTD04R ADVERTISING PERr~ IT ~~~~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ 197• Present Zoning ~ Fee Paid /4~~° Date _ -J2 Location ~La~ ~`lNr~,~t,~ S-o• Is sign erected at this date Yes No ~_ Erector $~ J? ~t~ -~i'-?~1 n Si j ) ~ ~J ~ . Address ~1 X113 11~-' ~ LJ~ K~ ST, • S~ c~:y~s= i"'~`- ; ~ . : g . Owner of Sign Address 'I~-pe of Sign: hull Hanging ~ Ground ~ Roof_~_ Pedestal ., ~ Pylon ~ ~ Single Face ~, Double Face ~ ,Business ~ Advertising [_,j Sq. Ft. ea. side ~~ :.Estimated cost ~ Constructed of 5~~z- ~~ y''~Sl/C, Completion Date .Total height from: (Ground) (Roof) ~ ft. Space beneath sign to: (Ground) (Roof) 3 ~?' ~,If illuminated: P1ame of Electrical Contractor Address '`Type of Illumination: Flurorescent ~j Neon ~~ Incandescent. Quartz ~ Mercury[] Other lear Glass ~. Frosted Glass[ Plastic Covered ~ ,Shaded (_[ Other lin Zi Other Wattage Flashing ~ Revolving ~ Trave g r` p In Applying for this Permit the undersigned agrees: 1. To accept and abide by all provisions oI; Ordinances #2.03 and #3.271 of the City of Richfield and all other pertinent ordinances or regulations that may be adopted in the future. 2. To notify Chief Inspector when sign is ready for inspecfiion, but before erection crew has left the job. 3. Electric wiring on illuminated si m t mply with City of Richfield electrical ordinances.. ~ a Signature of Applica ~~ ,~:~;,.-. /~ ~~~~'~ ~~/~ -5+~•?vG~f~"r~/ S/6/~ G~ . Address ~?~i~~ ~.eJ• Li4'C~ SJ Telephone No. ~2~ -~~6~~-' Approval Recommended ~ Approval Recommended(=1. Approved - ~oved by Council: Denied ~ ~ -C}iief -~n~s for Denied ~-'~`~ /~., Director of Public ,~' r - ~. Date ~ ~ 19 ~'b Date ~y~ ~ 19 ~ Denied~~ Manager Date Date 19 Council Stipulations 413.26 .. J.. . .. ` K ~ / . ~ ..., ~~~~~p~~~y s~~~ ~ ~o a~yr GROUND SIGN PEDESTAL SIGN HANGING SIGN r - WIDTH /Q / ~ ~_. / _. ~ ~ WIDTH ,., ' r __.____ W I D? H ,a ._____._ ! _ _:9 i i . _ .._ _._ _.__._ ~_ .--- .______. ~. .._.._ _.._ . LEGEND I I LEGEND ;~ ! a ~ ~ L~ ~~~ti~~ ~ i ; i ~ ~~~ ~ { F.i ~ ~ ~! - =~: ,•I, 1NOICATE Dt STANCE _r ~ j ~ FROM THE BUILDING ~ 3 ~ I ~, ~ GROUND WALL SIGN ROOF SIGN i ~~c---~--- W 1 DT H ----~* ~ ?~---~. WIDTH f 1 . LEGEND ~i..\ i I~ GR OllNO ~,.. ~.~ LEGEND RDDF INDICATE LEGENi: ON THE REVERSE SD E iN THE SPACE nEL04V _~ LEGEND ~~ __ . . - h~ I ~ ' .~ , ~ i PLACE LOCATION OF SIGN ON THIS SKETCH 1NlTH Di STANCE "~ - • THE SIGN IS FROM PROPERTY LiNESa "'LOCATE ANY TRAFFIC LIGHTS UV1THfN 600 FEET. I 47.3.26 SHEEt 2 OF 2 SHEETS ~: , ~~,. i _~_. ~ INDICATE~j. _ .~ NORTH ` CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 405. • Agenda December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of .Richfield . G~ntleznen: Sul?ect: Proposed MTC Bus Route Ch.azage. The city }~L3s xeceived a proposa'1 from the PJletrcipalitan Trans-it Cornrnission to c}Zange the routing of bus route ~ 50 through Richfield. <Before this change is implemented, it is MT.C policy to request city council approval to operate on the city streets. The MTC is requesting the council to pass a resolution permitting bus .operation on the following city streets: 76th. Stz~eet from the Richfi~,ld-Edina border to Sheridan Avenue South 76th Street from Third Avenue South to Twelfth Avenue South Twelfth Avenue South from 76th Street to 77th Street Bus route ~ 50 will make two morning and two afterzioon weekday peak period trips from St. Paul through Richfield to Southdale. All of the sections of roadway proposed in the bus ,route are constructed to a nine-ton, heavy traffic carrying capacity. The proposed route is in conformance with the city's Comprehe.~sive Plan. However, the city council may wish to request that the proposed route be altered - to provide service to the new S?nior Citizen residence on `77th Street and Chicago Avenue. The route. could be changed from 76th Street to 77th . Street between. Chicago Avenue and Twelfth Avenue. The. present posted four--ton load limit on 76th Street between ferxes Avenue and. Sheridan Avenue should be removed. It is recommended that the city council consider this request from the. ~. MTC at the December 27, 1976 city council meeting. ~~ ~ Respectfully subm' ted, ~~ ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager i WSB/ej'a cc: Planning T~irector ~. :~ RESOLUTION # ` REMOVING THE FOUR-TON LOAD-LIMIT ON 76TH STREET FROM SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH TO XERXES AVENUE SOUTH AND POSTING THE .SAME STREET "NO TRUCKS" WHEREAS, the 76th Street from Sheridan to Xerxes is a nine-ton street., and WHEREAS, as the MTC has been requested to provide east-:west bins service on 76th Street, and WHEREAS, that bus service is essential for south Rich- field residents access to Yorktown-Southdale area for empl oym;ent .and shopping; an-d WHEREAS,. the street wi17 be posted "No Trucks" between Sheridan and Xerxes Avenues South. NOW RE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the load limit of four tons on 7 h Street between Sheridan Avenue South and X xes Avenue S uth is removed and the same street is post d "No Trucks". Passe by the ity Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this ay of 1976. Loren L.. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk o .. RESOLUTION # AUTHORIZATION i'0 OPERAi~E BUSES ON CERTAIN RICHFIELQ STREETS WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has requested east- -west bus service on 76th Street, and WHEREAS, this service conforms to both the adopted Comprehensive Plan and to the 494/100 Southdale Corridor Transportation Study, and W.i~EREAS, the service will provide transit bus access to South-dare Shopping-Center, Yorktown area, Metropolitan Sports complex and downtown St. Paul, and WHEREAS, .the service will provide availability to both commercial and residential land areas along 76th Street, reduce congestion and improve safety. N04d, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council, City of Richfield concurs with the proposal to operate buses on the following streets which presently-have no bus service: 1. 76th. Street from Richfield-Edina city limits to Sheridan Avenue South; 2. 76th Street from Third Avenue South to Chicago Avenue.. South; 3. Chicago Avenue South from 76th Street to 77th Street; 4. 77th Street from Chicago Avenue South to 12th Avenue South. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1976. Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk .r .M,-.Swa.-"~~ T ~A~SIT ®-PE~ATIIUC ®IVISI®N 408 • 12.827.4071 3118 MCOLLET AVE. • MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55 6 . _ ._ December 14 1976 ,_ ._ Mr. Richard Krier, Planning Director City of Richfield . 6700 Portland Avenue Rchfield,,MN 55423. Dear Mr. Brier: The Transit Operating Division of the Metropolitan Transit Commission is proposing to extend the Route ~~50 express bus service from St. Paul through Richf field to Southdale. The service presently terminates at the Met Stadium park-ride. The proposed route is shown in Exhibit 4~1. Before a petition to make the changes on Route ~~50 can be sent. to our COmriliSSlon, we need to ob~:ain written concurrence from the City of Richfield to operate buses on the following streets which presently have no bus service: - On 76th Street from the Richf field-Edina city limits to Sheridan Avenue South, - On 76th Street from Third Avenue South to Twelfth Avenue South, and - On Twelfth Avenue South from 76th Street to 77th Street. Two morning and two afternoon weekday peak period trips would be scheduled. We would appreciate your placing this matter on the agenda of the next City Council meeting. If you-have any questions, please feel free to call either Mr. Scott Dickson, 827-4071 Ext. 269, or myself, Ext. 243. Sincerely, ~~~ ~` Fred T. Heywood, Director Routes, Schedules & Planning FTH:ksf Enclosure p. r. y Q. fd B fp ;.;; K n k ®• ~ Vl Ql~ jy ~O ~ O !o cn ~ w ~ • .. c~ ~ ~ .~ A `; t7 ry~M hJ b ... a a f .~ ~: o' a i ~~ ~;,:, ~0 C.+ » . ~ d '~ .~ ~t ~• w C.,e 68 0 ® ~ ~ n ~~ York kvc. ~~ ® . 8®~®m6ef~tGO~+la 8®® . ® / ® ~. YYyy ® I~ ® ~. ® n ® V ' ~ ~~ ~" ~ ~ Q [o M Fs . i} • e ~ ra O t~ O O O' • l~ 6 ~o v4s 12th kve, So. © , a 0 ~~~~;° ~,a ."" ~, CITY t~F RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . ~ Office of City Manager _ Council Letter No . 404 Agenda December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor end ' Members of the City .Council -.City flf Richfield - Gentlemen: .~ubje~t: Request for a Variance to sideyard Setback' 1302 East 66th Street The George C. Maurer -Construct-ion Company., 6625 Lyndale Avenue has requested a variance fromthe required sideyard setback of 28 feet 6 inches, to a sideyard setback of 14 feet 6 inches. The purpose of the requested variance 1S t0 a110W construction of a.proposed. office building at 1302 East .66th. Street. . The following items are attached to this council letter and will be referred to .throughout: Exhibit A -- current zoning Exhibit B -current land use Exhibit C -proposed site plan Background -The property at 1302 East 66th Street presently contains a Minneapolis Star and Tribune paper shelter and a gravel parking area. The applicant is proposing f:o construct a one •and one-half story office building. The Maurer Construction ~~ firm will .utilize approximately one-quarter of the space, with the remainder being yenta 1 space . The .side and setback is required by Section 3.39, subdivision 2, paragraph Y 3 ("...this regulation shall not reduce the buildable width of the lot to less than 30 feet."). Because this lot is 58 feet, 6 inches wide, an°d buildable area cannot be less than 30 feet, the required sideyard width. then becomes 28 feet 6 inches.. The applicant wishes to reduce this sideyard to 14 feet, 6 inches, for a variance of i4 feet. Council Letter No. 404: -2~ December 27, 1926 " _Requirements far Granting. a Variance A request for a variance must be judged in accordance with the criteria V :set forth in Section 3.40, subdivision 6 of the zoning ordinance. If the criteria for granting a variance are satisfied, the city council should grant the variance. If all the criteria are not satisfied, the city council should deny the variance request. Staff .Review and Recommendations The staff has, reviewed this. proposa for the conditions set forth in Section ::3.4.0, subdivision 6 of the zoning ordinance. 1, That there are speriai circumstances or r',onditions affecting the - -particular land, building or~use referred to~in the application, not common to other properties in this or similar district. It is the opinion of the staff that a special condition does exist. There are nine intersections, with a tofal of 36-.corner lots on 66th Street from 12th Avenue o Cedar Avenue. Only five of these have frontages which are less than Z5 feet. Of the five corner lots which have' commercial buildings, all are constructed. less than 30 feet. from their sideyard property line, abutting the street. The existzng setbacks on these five narrow lots range from one foot to twenty=five 'feet. ~' 2. That the granting of applications. is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment. of substantial property rights.. It is the opinion of staff that the granting of this variance is necessary for the. preservation of substantial property :rights. The setback requirements-.for a corner lot -zoned for commercial use are realistic and conducive to quality developments when there is sufficient frontage on the street serving the Comm- ercial traffic.. However,. when this same requirement is applied to a commercially zoned corner lot the width of this one , the requirements -often prevent the construction of a building of a size sufficent to serve as anything more than -some type of drive-in establishment. Therefore, this requirement would pro- . -hibit .the applicant from constructing a building compatible with the use of the adjacent commercial building and conducive to the type of commercial activity located on the east end of 66th Street. 3. That the granting of the application will not materially and adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood oz the property of the applicant and will not be materially- detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property Qr improvements in the neighborhood. It is the opinion of the staff that the granting of the variance will not materially and adversely affect the health: and safety of the neighborhood.: The structure in the proposed location would act as ~a buffer k~etween the single family homes _ l 'Council Letter No. 404 -3- December 27, 1976 to. the north of the-site and thecommercial and vehicle ac ivity along 66th Street. It'is the staff recommendation that the city council grant the request for ;variance in that the three criteria for granting of a variance are satisfied. Planning Comm:iss-ion Recommendation The planning commission reviewed the request for variance at its regular meetirig of November 23, 1976. The commission. recommended that the city ccauncil grant the variance, to allow a 14 feet 6 inch sideyard setback iz~zstead of the requi.red'28 feet 6 inches, in that .the three criteria for granting of a variance were present on the applicant's property. `Respectfully submitted„ Wayne S. Burggraaff City. Manager WSt3/eja cc: Planning Director Public Works Director I ,r 7 r t ~ i , . . > ., /,- .- Y ~ „ 1 ~ , f '. - j ~ c _ ' ~ a ~ _ ~., ~p.~ .._ _ I x~~.~ ~ a,y '` ~_.~ s ti { ~J~~,e r ! is (^~ °o u J~ '.. a; '' .~9 ~ - _ . ~9+' .. ~. y ~t`c' y, cD ,aS ' !~ ~ ~ 1` y~ i .. '. "1 cit 1: ~~ f t.,~. ' ~ ~ tG. ~il": '=op It It. 5ti 4.'{i ,~ ` ~"~~t c~, ~y n! '~~ ,~. } 1 .3 ..2. ~ Q i ~9 6 ~t ~I t .~ i , R~~`~ 'i :. ~7.~,` .c ~ 3 F.~- I ~ ! ; ~s h ~~~, ~. ~~`_.. y''~~` ~ ``~ 4 i Ir il~ ~ r ~' 'r>?n`A`=c `j ~'~ 1 !d s ~ ,1 ~ ~ f7 j f - ~ ~. ats+a+ - ' ~ F@ i K ~ x-~ .:~ s ~~ ~`vS ice ~~~'' {{ E ~ '~..n :'? ft.~ s _.. _ - .. ~%4. .. _ ,`• ~ t i q,.; t :. ~ ` ~ Fria ~- Z n_'~--'~ . ~ (. ~ J~ `- '~ ' ~ ~- ~ - - - V~ ~i . _. J ~ ~ .. ~x, ..: +' ~_ 'F.~ .sue ..i. Mwj iii ~1a f, ,, ~ 'Y`~ ~ `.tri,. .. _.. ~. ~J.si.. _,~°:;~...~ 4 :....,, X ~ i:.Kee..-_ ~.....-~-~-^~_-•t----S.~+:.. P~~ { ~ we 'w---~e--i7~~ -~'~ t - - :.~ -• ,.: ~~- _....._ - ~ ~" ;_. -.?...,.., _ , ..-,-, , t.. ~~~ ..} i'':' F i ~ :~i.e 4,' .f~'~~ 1 ~~~Y `~kf ...~~.~'}~v j . et ec ,_ t6: ~.} I f.~ •~_L•~D _ :~ `! 9 ` arc. 4 .._. ~1 ~ . °` ~ ..,.. ~ ..Je...~.., ~.'= '~ .; ,i.~~ a ~ " 'f3 42. ~ ~` ~it4c v ~' ~- ~ }',~ ~B ~ ~~~_, t :. ~, ..7~. - q ,r, e ., ~t i y, ~., ~ ,..a ^~ s~^' :S .. b.? ~, •,Z4^~ 7 t..~'~ll .doh ^,.r`_....`~e..._.~ ;: i,,"'~'",~'. ~'i~4 ._., ..~ ~:'S ]t. _. j.S _.., _-....,. -~,ti fC{""} G~l~~RI~L COf~M~RCIAL GENE ~, ~,~ . ~.. a ti ~, -'x .sx -. c .6 ....,~.e . ~ .~ +t 1 ~ .. j f ..... ~..~.~ f j.~. 7 J 1 f t' ~'~. .~. RAL I ~IDUSTR ILL ; ~' ~D DUSII~ES~ ~~~v k. ~~~ j :_. .... ~;f ~ C_., ~ . ~,r C~ ~ CSR ~ ~,,,,...t_:l G r N ( ~ ~ ! ~c ^ i , "`t.~'.'Y°` ~-- ~ _~.__...__ (~,3~ g_..... _,P Su, _. ti .. s~~.._ 1 :~ i -•~--• i •3 C ~; ' c.~ l.. M~ ~..~~ ,r_ .i C~•. 'R° _. .. l , r _ d . ....... + F - ..,,,.. 1' n t ~. _ ``~ } ! c ~ y + _ ~ `, a `{ t { , ~.J._. _`_<.? ~ ( f~ -' +.,._. .~ ~_._i ~ F ~ ~ i.. rl.( i. 4fSHb -l°~ ~..~ ~. _.. .t tl~_('s., ! --'. A.~ _. _ s _~. - id -- _ tv- 55 •, \~ W ~~_ - err i-~ ~ r _.. ! _.---•1 ["`.i ~. i ~ ~ 1'A- ~ •:j .~ ~.~_._t t ,^_~ ~_ _...~ i' ~s ~ j ~ ~- ~+~ ! s ~ " .rte- ~ ~. ~ nn ~ { ° ~) ~~ L ~. i~ ~` c? ~ [a,J~- ~. ---- r ,~ °"(-~.6 J ~ _.. ~+ _.,__ ~ t"1 ~, i ~ C~ ~~" fr C~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~'-~ h - --1~~.~ t--i_ ~ _ .... r ti' f ~ . /~ ca -~1,L.P ~., a 1 1 V ~ i ~ ~ ~ S. .4 `} 1 •.-----fib` ~ _! " _.__-__ -~_._ _---.,~--_ ~ n ~~ ~~'~~ r~:~t~t _~_ S~ f~j{[~j ~ 4 1 ®, ~. K ~ X99$11 f ~ ~j';`y{i _ ~ ! 7 Fi~T Y~ ~ .~ Y ~, f' 1 ~ r~ ~4y.4 ~~. o-,3' ~ r,.,j ~'r a ern 1 I_-'.-_._ ~ i I I ~_ ! _ -~ i i i.- l_._._.. ~5.. N ~ ~ { ~ ~_...~ N ~'~ 1 F~ty ~ j~ p ~LrJ"` ~ (..1..._ u . ~ ~~ `I ~~.~ ~ C.• (..r; .. h.s f~ ~~ ei`) { ~~1 "~ j .y _ .,t i `.~j'~' 1 {- ~ 'u~%~th (<~ `td I4 1~w t- ! S- ~.., to `~~ l.__J ~ `~ ~ ~~~ -- ~__ ~ l_~_ ~"" '} C~.n ~~~^tf ~•! ( ~, ~t l.. ~.. is ~ r,. ~ C f 1 i ~ ~. _ ( ~ i ~ ., S i r f _._ , ' -; ~~ ' _ 1 - iii . ~ ~.,.,,.......~......s.f r ~~~ _ ~~~ , ~ i ~.~.. '--~~ 30~ 3 -----20~---~ YJpUCf~ ~ CiF ~ Sign .--~--~----_...__. n V V tll C J f i5i Blacktop. ~. Q ~' p 9 ~~ k~I Scate~ i°= 20~ ~~~ ~ ~~ I - CITY QF RICI~T]?IELD, MINNP,SOTA Office of City IVianager ' '_ Council Letter No.: 403 Agenda December 27, 1976 ' The Honorable -Mayor and: b r f the Mem e s o t Council C Y 't f fie C i y o R; ch ld Gentlemen: Subject: Hearing, on .Community Development Block Grant., Program The second of two public hearings on the city's application for the Community L~svelopmerit Year IIT Block Grant Program is scheduled for December 17; 1976, Inasanuch as the city is a part of the Hennepin .County Urbana County application,- tYi~: h~;arings are technically being held gas joint hearings with Hennepin County. The purpose of the public hearings i.s to consider the amended housi.n; assistance plan and the amended rommur~ity development plan, Roth of t"2se plans were adopted by the city council ir_ 1975 ai>ci thc: amended plans gererallX~ follow the original plans adopted- in 1975. In the case of the communiay development plan, of which a copy is attached, fhez~e are the following changes: 1. - Community development funds for the L/H/N commercial i.mprovomPnt ' project have been deleted from the Year III applicatior_. Use of these monies for tree L/H/N project is being discontinued because. caf more costly i Federal relocation requirements tuhirh the city would be required to pay through. the i,/I~/N project i.f the community development; fu.,ds were used . for the project. 2 , Prior to this arnendment, $90, 500 iii community development funds were to be used in park development in 1977. Because the community development funds which were to be used in the L/H/N have .been shiated' to parks development, a total of $198., 000 will be available for parks development in the Year III Grant, 3 . Comrriunity development funds for housing rehabilitation remain uncharrgeu . I ~~ ~. Council Letter No. 403 -2- December`27, 1976 I ' The amended housing assistance plan. is also attached. The changes in hat- plan are' as follows; f; 1. The. current yearprogram goal for leased housing was .reduced from 52 to 30 units. to reflect the actual allocation of units . The sp it between.. elderly and non-elderly units is changed..accordngly. 2: The third year prograan goal -for leased housing was reduced from i43 u:~?its to'13.2'units. This amendment is necessary so'that uve do'not jeopardize the use of community development funding. Iri the first year of community development block grant funding, the city . r~c~vedapproximately $99,000 as its share of the Urbana Hennepin County Entitlarnent: In 1976 this amount was'' $204, 000'. It is estimatied thai the cite. v~rill receive approximately $236, 000-for Year III, federal fiscal` year 1978. In pre~aratiUn for the public hearings on this subjer..t' adequate.legai notices have been published in the newspaper and a .special story. has been included in the city's v~rinter quarterly report. Leiters Have been sent to all citizen advisory corzlmissions offering ~n opportunity for suggestions from those groups. It is the opinion of the st~ffthat these and other efforts made by the city meet:the require- ~`~ meats of the federal. regulations for .participation in the development_of the community development block .grant application. - Since the first public hearing on December 13, 1976 individual members. of the planning commission and the park and recreation advisory commission have reviewed the community development plan. Members of the park. an:d recreation advisory commission concurred- with the proposed-communitydeveloiiment plan. Members of the planning commission have indicated a desire that an amendment be lidded to the plan to eliminate architectural barriers in the city. Although the- elimination of architectural barriers is an eligible community development activity, it is the recommendation of the staff that the council policy ._ ~to eliminate barriers as part of various city projects, i.e. , permanent street imipravement project, sidewalk repair project, is sufficient to eliminate architectural barriers , Thus , it would not be necessary to earmark comrriunity development funds solely for the elimination of barriers. The staff al o received a request from a member of the senior citizen and handicapped commissicn to purchase a handicap van with community development funds . Such a purchase is an ineligible activity and cannot be funded with the community development block grant. ~~ J.J ri'^r 1 U i~lo ' ~< 's~ ~~~::::: .. ;a .December-15~ 1976 ~~~~~~~. C~ of ~~~ 7011-FIFTEENTH AVE. S0. RICHFIELD.<M INN. 55123 PHONE $56° 5100 ROfERT J. LIEN EXECUTIVE 5'cCRETARY - i• m ~~at~ Q> ~®~,F^ ~die~rreo S`etiw M[MtSR U.S. CHAta6ER OF COWlNERCE Mr. Mark D. Hendrickson Community Development Grants Coordinatar CITY OF RICHFIELD 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfieldy Minne 55423 Dear Mark: ,~_„~ In reference to the letter received by you the lager part of November relative to federal community grantss T would in short like to cite three 'items as-'a private citizen that I feel should have some priority: 1. Projects directed to. the removal of material and architectural barriers which restrict the mobility and accessiblity of. elderly and handicapped persons. (I was quite distressed at the last Planning Com*nission meeting when the commissioners gave no concern at all.for the accessi- bility to our people. It took me G years and 2 mayors: to get a- ramp into City Hall .and I sincerely feel that our City is derelict in its consideration of the physically handicapped. In magazines I gets mayors and .councilmen of other communities have confined themselves to wheelchairs for up to a week just to realize how many barriers they must overcome. I have sat back for years and not fought the battle for anyone else and. I thintc itts time for me to says laughingly "stand up and fight." Letts make our city a city that cares.) 2. I sincerely think and hope that the members used in the commu- nity block used for health services will be used in a productive way and not just as a show case.? 3. One of my pet peeves has always been the lack of taking car e of our present trees in the park system and T think that this along with the fighting of Dutch Elm diseases demands our immediate attention.' There are many other fine priorities that others will haves but T justwanted to get across these three as my personal,viewpoint. Sxncerel ~'~~ ~ ---~ _ f~ st obert J Li~'en; r Ht~ip "Ei~6~t8CP~" Rich~ic~le# Theou~ 'tifs~or Charniaaa~ o$ ,Catr+~+trc~ i • 1 FROM sue~~c-r Third Year Comrilunty Development Block Grant Funding CITY O(~ F~ICH~'1~-:1_~Jm ~{I~~l~.S(?'i"~ inter--Qffiice Mem~~randum oaTC December 17, 1976 To Richard Krier, Planning Director Donald A Fondrick At the Tuesday:, December l4, 1976; regular meeting of the Richfield Park and Recreation Advisory Commission discussion teas held regarding the third year, 1977-1978, fundirSg of the Community Development Bloci: Grant program as it related to park and r.ecrPatio,n projPCts. The staff indicated a total of approximately X199,000 would potentially be available through i;he program for a funding period of July i , 1977 thra«gh Ju-ie 30, 1978. It was suggested by staff, and approved by a consensus of the Commission members present, that X109,000 would be Uaeli toward .major park development or redevelopment in 1978. At the present time, it is the recommendation of the Commission and staff that Christian Park be designated for major ctevelep- rnen~ i ri 1978 .•a~ ~h a total pr•o j cot coat. of apprax i r~,ately $~; 7 ,~00. iryi to t#~e use of Community Development r;;;n;es, tf~e project appropriation rtitould be X109,000 funded through Community Development and $338,000 funded through the Special Revenue Fund. Following a.brief discussion, the Commission took action: to recommend the use . of Comrnuni ty Development funding for the cor~pi eti on of tdashi ng~ton Park. Theis was in accordance with previous discussion he'Id by the Commission in February and March of 1976. • If I can provide any additional information regarding Community Development Block-Grant appropriations for third year funding, please do not hesitate i;o call or see me. Donald A. Fondrick, Di rector Park and Recreation Department DAF/lje • 1975--1977 CQM~iUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROGRAM HOUSING ASSLSTANCE-PLAN Kichfield, Minnesota 1. Community Development Plan Sununary long term objectives short terms objectives 2. Statement of Need to'r Community Developi~:ent Projects 3. Rousing Assistar~re Plan ~~ City ..Council 1lpprovalo Est Fear Approval: 8/30/75 2nd. Year Appr°oval 2/9/7 6 3rd Year Approval. y~ A {~~ILfi~I'i'Y DE1r'~LO~A~IENT PL~'V SUti~~~'~Y ,~ Bath the long term and short term objectives address fihe statement of need. } LQn~ 'T'erm I31~ve]_o ~mert Objectives ~• ~o r a.s3~Terr~~; tae. r~:sident~al aspeci:s of ~ic3~.field, - Tee improve the residential enyixonment of the co~r~r~uns.ty. - ~o elrmii~ate deterioration and bl~ ghting ~.nfl~ences to xes~.dential an:d cor:~~.eroa_~i a~;o3 ~ - --,~'c~ 3r~rove the serv~.ce delivery systom of r.,it~ goverr~on*. T choices . - '~`o ~s~•i:~vde a ~,;reater range of hflus~.~l~, ~.ort Term Del*e3_o n_ ~~ =e~lt_Objoctives - I3T=~~rove anal e?.iminate deterioration in residential ncight~orl~.r~o~~ surro°ulcung thL ~.yndr~J_e/~Ia,~~i?icolJ.e~. Co~nnerciaJ_ area and pro~~de p7_a~~~~.ng aid reJ.ocat~an ~sist- - Provide for ren°wal of appro.~imately 10 dezer3_oxated. homes. - ~';_.~1,~.~_de xor the rehabilita~:ion of approximately ~3 hoRies. - P~-o~ride minor park development and imprrnremen~s to existing parks. - EJ, ;..,:mate backwash water discharge into Legion ~,a~:e Fa-r_k. - I~~;constract a facility for senior c;i tizens ir~ -~~e old libra7•y'. ~~. E;kxovide rehabilitation funds for 7G Parhfield ~~ameoW~~.exs. STA~'LM~NT OF 1`dZrD -Senior Citizen Center: Reconstruction of the vacated 1i}~rary building "foresenfor_ citizens. The facility's reconstruction will make the phy- ~sical improvements necessary fi:o deliver integrated housing. and other social as we 11 as recreational services. Estimated Cost 'and Source of Funds Year T" Year II` Year IhI Community Development Funds $ 50,000 $ 10,500- Special Revenue, Funds ~~ 6G, 00.0 Total Cost $1J_6,000 $ 10,500 Data Source : 1.975-1980 .Capital Prog-rara -~~tis~e~ Backwash System: This proSect consists of the installation of a water system to recycle backwash water at the city'_s water treatment .plan.- The system is required by tYe Ma_nnesota Pollution Control Agency to prevent the discharge of untreated backwash water into Legion Lake Park r~s~~.mated Cost and Source of Funds Year I Community Development Fu:lds $ 30,000 Plater User fees 50, 531 Total Cost $ 80,531 Data Source: 1975-1980~Capital Program -Hou~a_ng Rehabilitation: This project is to provide an interest write down through a grant program for the rehabilitation of both renter. ar_d owner occupied single fami]_.y housing. An estimated total o~ 53 units eri.ll be rehabilitated.. Estimated Cost and Source of Funds Year T Year 1Z 'dear IIl' Community Development Funds $ 10,000 $ 37,500 $ 37,500 HRA ~ -0- -0- 15,000 Total Cost $ 10,000 $ 37,500_ $ 5?_,50.0` -New Home Procxram: The purpose .of_ this program is to assist in the ei.i•- Spot Renewal) ~• urination of residential deterioration. The prog~s~am consists of the pur-- chase .on the open raarJcet of e~istixxc~ vacant homes and lots sah.icl~ aro 3.n. STI~TEMENT OF NEED -2~- , • a dilapidated condition. The method of financin g will be to establish a revolving fund through fu.ras gained in selaing city own ed-lots in ~ di i l h New Fard Town and through Community Development ng. fun ng v e revo T fund will be repaid from the resale of land.. Estimated Cost and Source of Funds Year I Year II ~ Year III. (to start .revolving fund) Community Development Funds $ 50,000 ~. -Sale of Lots ~ $ 50,000 Total Cost $ 50,000. $ 50,000 --Tyndale/~iub/Nicollet: The L/Fi/N Commerical Improvement Program is not yet completed. There is a need for some public funds in the. project. Estimated Cost and Source of Funds Year I Year II Yeai III Community Development Funds $ 81,000 ~_ Total Cost $ 81,000. w ark Development: Development of Memorial Park in 1.975, additional c~z~velopment at Taft Park .and redevelopment of Fremont Par k in 1977. Development of one major park in 1977-78. Estimated Cost and Source of Funds Year I Year II Year 1TI Community Development Funds Special Revenue Funds '!'otal Cost $ 8,855 19,741 $ 28x596 $ 25,000 35,_000 $ 60,000 $198,000 86,000 $2£35, 000 S U M M A R Y `~ Program Year I Program. Year~Il Program Year-III 76 Oct 76- July 77 July 77- July. 78 Oct ?5-Sept Senior Citizen Center- _ Federal CD $ 50,000 $ .10,500 $ ' Local 66,0.00 Water Backwash System .Federal CD 30,000 'Local 50, 53.1 Ht~usS,ng Pehabili i-:ati:c~n ~ . Federal `CD 10, 000. 37, 500 ~ 37, 5,00 !, Local 15;.000 New home Program Federal Cn 50,000 Local 50,000 L/H/N Federal CD 81,000 ~ Local I Park Development Federal CD x,855 25,000 199,000 Local 19,741 35,000 86,000 Total k'ederal CD ~$ 98,855 $ '204,000 $ 236,000 Total Local TOT1`y3~, ~. - $ 136,272 $ 35,OCQ $ 151-,000 ~$ 235,127 $ 239,000. $ ~ 387,5.00 - -( % 7 t ' ": r' •` f:" ~f~ v ._.. } ` ~ rJ i i r' ~- .i 1 (1 1 z :, ~ l ,, •r u; ~~ }_ ~ ti, w ` <t ~ iu fC c .~ u .. ~ t- O' Z F= ~ o w u of h...~. .r .-•- - ~- ''-- ~ ~ _~ J - " ~ \ ' : i F.. . ~ 1 a: •' C) '-i ( ~ fC 1 ur ~ J r W ~ tx. i t- m Q: t U r - ~~ Ct- -L ..1 ~ I1J 1 U l ~ 0 O >- I F~ t:. --,, U "^ ~ H S w U F• ( j w • p .. rl l r i ul t r- r, _ -_ ~ _._ ~ r Q) CJ) GJ Cn r] . '~ ' ' tC ~ . ft s - . .; o o cnco~ o o a o a N.~Ws" •: ...1 .J N. N S" 3 i _.-! -] ! to ~ (n ~ N . ~ ..._.. ... _._~_..._ __.. ._..-__.___.._. --- .....•~..E.ca. o .. .. .. .. rn O q • i> `~ o O O O rcF' l0 O O r • tf) O r r- O c+ ;~ .~ ~ _.. i ~ C -~ `( :l "~ F- C) ti) to ~ ~;': t•~ !. - ~ .r ;~ ~ ~ ~~ 2 . tt' (7 U '( ul to ~. ' - ( } Y U , cn o -- - -- J T m G tt oC Q _~ C7 ul O > Q--. . n.' tl ~_ In in ,~1 h ~~ .` =' u i -\ \ t !_. f -! q ' ~ o ~ ~ ~ r O lt7 . r' ~ r M r,1 O O p 1 N ~ ., r. ^ w Ln L~ ~ i. -- -- o ~ - -- -.. .--- -- O O .' CQ N O 'N ~ ~ ~ L.C) L~ Ln Cil cn r tl) N ~ . ~[ ~~ ui rn ~ s' ~ .... ~ _ 1- ;f• ,., O O Vi to Ci.. -• I . . U Gi _ ~ ~ to to N ~ Q ~ ! N N ~ n •. ~ ~ - N N N~tlD00 Ci'd'C-'NN N L . -Nj}-u! ~\ ! ~Y 'ct cf- ~ 00 NNN 00 .tom r N In CO O t4 U .• Cl 1- I p~ • • N N CV N ~ . ~ ~ n ~ n •.' • • d' ~' G?' CY d' • CS ,(~F-[7 ~ll f: ( - ~ ~rMtnt~C)1 N rMlnQl~ N N N N N M d •: • --. U t- u' J CY ~' CC' CY Ct' CY ~' ' ~• c~- Ct' G'~" Gf' ~' C~ --- -• - N N N N N N N -----_....___.._-__-- - .- A! N N N N ------ _,----_._ -..~-~___ _N -- W ~ . ? wl--: t- rr •_ !- t C7) •( rj ` C) t iv ~ N ~ .J :f:,F~ .r > ~ rn ro ~ O --------- - -_--- --- -------- ----- -- -- ~ ~~ C q2 d •t- E N -1-) N r ~ CL ~ . •r 1,y a3 N N 5.. r- i ~ S-. r1 r C . C U S•. d. CL tCf O •r- N O N A; ~ -N ~ LZ O d' •4-~ r > F 7 © - ~ ~ 'O N ~ -F-~ ~ ~ •r U - ~ N N Ct O •r . O S N r 0 U >> ~> O C - r U C.S -1-~ r N C7 v1 •r N N N r- 0. ~ P`i tG •r ~ •- f •r ~G .}..) p Y GJ ~) w -• r'-' •r ~ QJ O O r S- r V O N T r S- ~ O •r S- U O t--• ~ - n_ cC) i } N f]. •r O 4- CY L).. i-) 1 ~C i d. .Y ..~1 h .~ O -1-) -~~ O .. O = E T3 tCi ~ S- ~G f S_ . S- ~ N r tC5 C N •r cn II r-t J to f:' S.- (Ci :- ~ (t7 N U ~ N N SZ +-) (tS C C S_. -N to r S- ~. LL tc3 ! Q ~ (] •r- O •r {~ N •~-~ N •r N G) ~ C Q_ +~ ~C -C7 •r G r '> .r-. ~ ~ ~. N r-- ~ C O L'~ r S- r'- N x ••` Q1 .r r---1 CJ N .~ Sr N N RS N S_ i-) N ~ N ;"S S•. F .~ ~~ r > ~ U C 11.4-) N > U 'C7 :.. ~ f: > , CL tF. S O.. ~S G:~ .x -Ll~ _ O I r~ ~ in .:' O >--r •r- G) .tom O CtJ . ,c to >. o +~ s.. S- 4- w ~. :n _ +-~ ~ V .>G=' fZ~ ~l S_ -tJ Cl.'r7 N 4- 01 :U O 4•• Q r- N M GJ c. GJ -C ~ ~ 4 _~• 5.~ -% N :.3 S- O tCy _ [~ •r i.f. _ -1J N_ •r _ f-1_'T$ t,~ _~ G[; Ll`• _f].- ~-' .,, t 4, C7 H n :a (7 ~' ' i . r• .. r t 1~ r, ~; `: ~~- -. Fti=•~. _a . i, `_ •i ~= •'l'• •~i\!w^~yu +•.~. \S. N. .y. y\ 1~' -'T - ':;\V• y If 4Y .'•T` 'Y'YY!'Q - 4 ...• ... }' (~ •, •~ ~'•. \ •f~r..•~+J:1 \' . r ~ ,1 r ~. - =s f ~ / 2 1 ~•-,.~>, •1 ».. ~ ! \ / a f ~ ~5 \i g. M `~a; ~~, y~ ' , .! f 'tai . • ns rn --- a! cn ' r O ~ U O S,. ..... > rtf N > tCf N :~ C1 N ~ _ ~ .~ Vj LLB to O O O ~ Q O O ..~ N O Ct' N ..~ .--.. y~., . •--• l4> 1 ~ ~~ C ~i' 1 <~ 1 Q ~ (] • / N C31 O> dl ~~ ~- C' d" • N LV N ~ .. N . C 1- O t ~}-~ / 'a'~ ~~ ~F- t= .Y i= r _Y_ Q! S_ W ~.~ QI S•> ~ ref E N KS La.. 0.. L.1 r3 a. O O .C r- C r- LJ ~ N. O QJ ~ •r 41 CA (U C]. -1-~ ~ i. Ca t/1 •r -C3~.! .r_~. ~~ C i-. S- S_ N L 'DAFT i ' ~ F(OUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN . RICf;FLELD; MINNESOTA ~i Fiousing Assistance Plan, as outlined in Title I of the H~usiriy and Community Development Acct of 1974, consists cf four maing parts: I. Suruey of Housing Conditions-(Table I} I1:, t-iousi ng Assistance Needs of Lo~i~er Ineo-ne tfouseholds (Table II) - III. Annual Goal for Housing Assistance (fable III) l:~'. General Locations of Prorosed Housing for ° Lt~~aer Incoma Housetiol ds {Tail e I1~') . 'fhe przrpose of tine Housing Assistance Plan is to provide an assessm;.nt of - pausing conditions -and needs, and to set realistic annual goals for meeting. a portior, of those needs in conjur-ction with community development activities to be undertaken in Richfield. `Tfae v~rr~i ous ports o f the Plan, along ari ti', an expi ~~n~~ti cn of hog; each part ~~,~:s tEevel o~~ed fo71 o'rrs . 1PAI2T I. SURVEI' OF HOUSIliG CONDITLOiiS ~~s part is to "accurately sur~jey the condition of the housing stock in the ' c~m!nu n i ty" . _ . T~afl sources of data were used as the most accurate information available at •t~hi~ i;ime on conditions of housing in A.ichfield. They are: i. 197fl .Census - 4th Count. and 5th Count (Special Run) 2. R_ eport on Survey of k-tousi~~Condi ti ens , Metropolitan Council, .prepared by Economic Research Corporation, " January, .1975 ' ~'~e limitations on the accuracy of the Census data are that it is now seven years . ®acts and that the housing "conditions" being measured are the age of the structure - _ 2;~a~ ~i~e lack of same or all plu~birig facilities. ~+on~ttie less, it is possible to ~a~in ~n-Formation-form this data, and it is possible to separate rental housing €:a~nd7i:ions from owner occupied housing conditions. IDyO Densus 6th Count data was used to determine the number of substandard c~n~i=s i n P,i chfi el d, as ~rrel 1 as the total occupied and. vacant units by tenure as e~t~~:n an Table I. Substandard units here are tt~!ose units. which .have i ncom;~l etc' g~~~~m~ing facilities. _ ~~a-3:r~t,l e for P,ehabi 1 •i tati on units were determined from 1.70 Census Fourth Count. ~~~r,u estimates here made saki rag al 1 occupied un~ is bui 1 t prior to 1939, .and ~x3 ~:~ii rt the range of values and r+:nts affordable by l o~r•r and rnode~°ate i r~ca„~? ~.~ersons ~~,~JzJ~month rP_nt, X19;999 Val ue) - bLit exCl Ud1 riCi t}1QSt~- Ulll t~ Cii V~'r'1 i ~1'i L_a~i'v.c ~r~d ~^t~nt ~belol~ ~I0,000 value and be101•r IGO1r~oi-~~h) as going not; capable o"~ ~~fi~~bilitaion. Very fe,•r units were excluded in this process as being, not capable ®f ri#~abi 1 i tati on. ~O:ti~ner--occupied 39, r~•rlter-occupied 11) Tie total thus achieved as shot~rn on Table I was compared t.o the most recent survey ~nfcrmation, Report on Survey of Housing Conditions, prepared for. the P•letrnpolitan ~flurcil by Economic Research Corporation. This survey was conducted throughout tie seve;3•-county metropolitan area, i ncl uc;i ny tt~e City of f:i c}1fi el d , duri :1g t},e sI-~x•3~~g and surrm~r of 1974. All structurLs wore yi ven a vi seal exterior i nsp°c-~i on d13~~ toted aGCUi'dl ng to unl form Crl teri a 1•>'fl1 C=i a:•rdrdeG "p~ i nts" t4 S r(.C ~L+'t':S CeI~E:I?dM ~~f~ ail tiff? li'„li„Jt.'.r and Sever ~ iy Of ~-:ructura ! d~feC~:S 5,,",l Cl~ 1:ere vi Sit ! ~ ~:l ti;e ~~;~~r i fir. • ?i~~~ Durpose of the original survey s~ras to determine the number of substandard str~.~~tt;res in the !;~otropo7itari area. In tt,is survey, Rict~~field had 0~ ~u~s~and:ard - sr~ctur~es. - estimates on the norther of housing units srhicn could be rehabili-f.ated were tY~er, - ~~•~~ared using the orginal survey information.. These estimates sho~~~; ttlat :353 structures need some or possibly major rehabilitation in Richfield, trhich cor;p::~res f~vora~ly to the 1970 Census figure of 401 structures.shotrrn on Table I. ~• • A • ~i 1> ~ p r~ ..qp ay ~ EW ~ O ti. uo ~• ~ J i ~ ~ ~ ~. .. ~ ' t. 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~. r- {J. • o_ •r- U ' O ' J of f- ' ' ~ U ~ W - Q J ~ p tl' O V' tO M o v U ~ ~~ o r• N ~ i U L O y ~~ s a c om L rtY +~ ui rc a o •r- Ts c Q O N 1" -- l~ W $- O '~ O f; Z C i '7 r- Y N > ~ Sfl ~~ ~ v i-~ N Q > J l Q~ p J M U S_ N Y O T < r ~ eo r` _ a ` ~, ~ Q1 ~!' •O l7 W LL O f` t~ l0 W ~ O ~ rc ~ O r ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ rn• O Q W ~. r ~ ~t _ s_v ~ ~ - ~ O. a f ~ E v ~ N ~ ~ ~ N ^ O GJ N ~ ~~ N 5- ' ~ d • ~ U ~ .~ Z O • r7 d. r Y Z} Q1 N - -fw h 3e ¢cc ~t F m F ct ~ o v~ N N O J N O 'J S f " ~ N N {, C _ X = O ~ ¢ h 2 u C1. C .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c A U VT Y' C7 ~ I U N 7' ~" z 'ct o b = ~~ ~ 1 ~ w ~ a .c c w { tU ~~ O ~ ~ o z - - - - t] ~_ y-. ~ z a ~ o Q (J c or, ~ O u o o u_ a im _ U o ~n • u v , r- 'r E ? V lu O w 6 ~ t` W M W cp ~ C s N 07 M in V r` ~ ~ U . +.~ r Uf N 7_ L' Z O ~ O O _ u L1 rt5 ~ rt! Q ~ H s - 3 . ~ •~_ O a b 1'" ~ ' J ~ Z ' J O U T3 rt3 -- - ' n O > ¢ I O (3 7 C z ~.. t 7 tt ~ o ~ U Gin o >< a~ n Ls ci > n W in ~ V. ~ Z 07 r r,? U i ~' 7 7 _ a. O - 34 :J n - U ~ Q' 0 0 W J W ~ V ~ ~ r • N Y S tJ q r rt3 Z3 O. ' 'L />, ~ Q ~ O a O M, l0 r- to v ~ 4- C b L 4 l v I : ' Z .... C a -_- $ I 0 , H v -.~ c > M M O N iJ QI CJ t0 w I U, d n 0 _ 5 z ui ~ ~ C ~~ S E ~ .J O Q C LL K O1 N U -,. S. r. S= U J .C S 2 ~ y l f`- n QI E. ~~ V Z . O 3 _ ' ~~ U J O to to N d' W N ~ O. (6 - C' O S O 4 h V' V to N M I.tJ V "r _ h r F=- o ~ Q in }- V7 ~. - _ 4 N (i W ° O ' C7 ~ a a a o :. 7 ~ W O ~' ° ~ Q } N r Vl - . O (7 - - - V :>= a - ti N a y~ C H N 4 }• O O ~ z ~ ° ;; mo o-. ( r '~ u e ~ ~ ; us n Y o r o ~ - N N b r - n ~i ~ C • C • a '~' 'O " I x r ~ ~ ~ a - ~ ' J J _ ~ -. ° ° c~ u a F I N o -` Q C O C l--- l11 ro w LL F 1 2• oy - O ~ 1 u ~ ~- o O o O ~ U "v ..~ a ~ r = i r N v v " .n v -o ' Q d •r~ 7. ~i u ` 'i .. .v ~ a X o 0 cL ~ .q v I 'a ~' r rn ~- ~ _ C> .- - ' > > 4 ~. ~ ~ - u N ~ N =i ui x Q r- ~ p - y (.) _._ .-.- ....-_ -._. _____ ___.._ .__ _ ____ ~ - hESOLiJTION N0. RESOLUTION ADOPTTNG THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPh1ENT PLAN AND PROGRAM AND THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN WHEREAS,~the City Council of the City of Richfield has revieUred the Community Development P1-an and Program and the Housing Assistance Plan in accord tti~ith the Housing and.Community Development Act of 1974, and 41tiEREAS, the City Counc~i i finds a need to provide comrnurri_ty; development for the assistance of lour and moderate income people and the elimination of blighting conditions, a,rd WHEREAS, the City Council finds a need to provide subsidized housing for low and moderate income people including elderly, and WHEREAS, the City Counc~i 1 ~~i 7 7 revi evr the Con:muni -~y Development P'ix.n and Program and the i-lousing Assistance Plan on an annual- basis, anti .WHEREAS, the Community Developmen~c P1 an and Program and the }ior~si ng Assistance P1 an r~ri 11 be made part o.f Henr,epi n County "-Urban Cou,1'cy" Entitlement Grant application. NO.W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Richfield does hereby adopt the Community Development Plan and Program and the Housing Assistance Plan and authorize the City Manager to submit a Community Development S1ocI: Grant application and prepare ~.~lans to irnplement the Housing Assistance Plan. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of December, 1976. 1. o r e ri L. L a ~~r _____~__~_. h1 a y o r ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Cl e, kk i~ ` ' • PART I I HQUSING ASSISTANCE FIEEDS OF LO~rJER IPiCOME HOUSEHOLDS The purpose of .this Part is to determine the number of households currently resid- ing in Richfield as well_as those expected to reside in Richfie]d that. will require housing `assistance. For the, purposes of this Part, the households "in need" are those (1) whose incomes are within the limits of the Section ~ Housing Assistance Payments Program, and (2) are likely to apply for such a Program because of current "inadequate living conditions". I~~co~ie limiis for the Section 8 Housing Assistar.ce_ Payments Program are as. follows: • (iocierate) ~ (l.~w) • l:c}~•1er Income VEry Low Income Fa~aily-Size 80/ of i~fedian 50°' of hlndian 1 $ 9,600 $ 6,000 2 ~ 11,000 6,900 . ~ 3 12,400 7,700- • ~ 13,800 8,600 5 14,700 .. 9,300 • 6 15,500, 10,000 • ~ 7 16,400 10,700 8 or more 17,.300 11 ,400 Boi;h families and the elderly are eligible fo•r.assistance. 5::;;ton 8 Housing r'tssistance Pa~,~;<:nts Program is a new rental assista.r.ce ~n,ogr•ar aut;~o:~i zed by the HoUS i ng and Ccmmurii ty Development Act of 1974. l;~`i e7 i gi bl e recipient o~~ renta'i assistance ~vr ul d pay 15 to 250 of i ncor~e for rent, and HUD tivould pay the difference bettireen This arnount and tf3e Fair market rent the prc~pcrty o~<i~er ~tivould nor~;,~ally receive for the unit. "Inadequate livine~ conditions" include: - Lacking plumbing faci i i t'i es ,:~ _ Overcrovred -• Paying more than 25% of income .for rent - Owners in housing over 30 years old and valued at less than $10,000 A11 of~these factors were combined in a special computer tabulation of 1970 Census data, with a breakdovrn by size of household as shown in Table IIa. The total households needing assistance in Richfield are shovrn om Table II. It irtcl'udes all renter households (1,103.) within income limits and living in "inadequate conditions" except for non--elderly one-person households , vrho vroul d not be :cli;gible. It also inclades 20 elderly owner households haying low or very low income and- living iti •iriadequate living conditions. Larger families (families with 4 or more m•i-nor children) are separated out to deter~.~iine the number of units needed with 3 or snore bedrooms. This number was reached by counting half of all income-eligiblejinadequately-housed 5-person households, and all 6 or more person households in the same category. This totally 31 large families. Elderly households needing ssistance vrere dra~~in from the Same special tab of 1970 Census data. 29'9 is the number of alderly renters -and owners with lo:~r or ~tery low incomes and in "inadequate living conditions". ~'fhn number of har~di capped (peg: sin ~ d i sabl ed mere ,thar, ,f/ months and unable to ' t,ot~}.•in Richfield vras 392 in 1970 Census. Fcu~ per ce.r~t of all hc?usehc;:lds in 1ichfield vrere found to be income eligible and. inadequately housed. This four per cent need factor applied to 392 gives us an estimated 16 Nandi capped eligible ~, for Section 8 housing subsidies and in need of assistance. Thus, the total elderly and handicapped is 315 (299+16). In t~(i ration According to ~~~etropolitan Council estimates, 101 new households are expected to t°eside i n Richfield 1975-1980. ~,~e estimate .four per cent of these yr i 11 be "in need" or 4 households of vrhich 20%, of about 1, may be expected to be handicapped or eld~rly< i .~ .~ i ~ , N 1 C • P d 6~• ( ,~. v Q G N z p E m _J • `O t ~ z iU ~ ~ i ~ ', u z t7 *. J z ly, O a ~ o n ~ it! L1 W D .~ z ls.t m lJ 4 0 Q N O N z N ~ ' ' O J Z a O -] h ~ w x h K ~' Q 0. w w J n m Q J }"" i 7_ • 4 fl. 11l T_ a t~ "' 7_ a _ ~ s E ~ O <> ,Q O ~ v O N - v n ~ ~, H N W W O ~ w o o .~J h t K - O u.~4 O a u " u Z ' O d. W 1 Z J of _ ~ a o p I h J Q ~ m 7 _ V. W LL ¢ a. U W p 4' O a ~ p o oZ p t W H ~ ul l ~ CJ O O t J J _ N t ~ J Q l0 o h ' V .` IJO c u ~ M l ] ~ p M Z ` j ¢ o N W ~ 4 N O 0 W _ J y M +~ r ` 1 O w ? z . .3 ~ } p ~ Q ,_ ~ M . ~ M ~ O u- ` a o W o - ~ z ~- w ~ w V - _ p' = p a C s t w W J y4 J Q . N W N f`~ .. - ~ Z W 4.. O Z N -J Q Z J W I ~- __- r ~ a- ~ ~' 1 J Q ~O h c ~ O in 7 o h ~ _ O r ~ t w 4 o J u ~ y -_ V ~ 1.C) 0. m O ~ J~ ~ C n N ~ t .C d LL t ~ O v J < W y 4 ~" h J ~ .. ~' M Ol l0 • O J p 5 < o 'N- •"' l0 ~O O 2 W LL ,, Q = n ~ ~ Oa o a .,, _ o N J G ?/ Q ~ n ~ N CYJ M M n c !. J wa~- J h ~ {i O7 r~ 0 o h ~ Ch O N LLl U W U N c~ v 3 0 s 0~ _ U ~ C E= LLJ N W U C(J r ~ ~ ~i , - W O W U = i , ~~ F-- o U UJ h ? ~ ~'~ v N ~ IiIJ C)~ - ~ W N ~ < W +. c !t U 'p V n :' n~ l J y U , N_ uJ o ' ti r ~., `; h ~ 1' Q ~" y J ° ~ ' n C ` d~ c J u _ i~ I~cj z u. u o ° x r lJ n ~ V S N W .~ N .~ ~., l,_ y. _ _ .1 U ~ ' ~ Jb O~ G~._ _1 __ ~ ~' F:. LL ltJ F- ~: ' l~ O n C. .1 (~ ~ i to _ , 111 :1 ~ ~I` llJ` CG UT S._ O-y 1 :- C),f f-~.. G) d ~ -1 t .r Z . U 4 [O U C] W '~ c d U'. ~ • Y T 0 S?. ~~ O ~c1 S_ t. +~> .-IN n~ m GJ a~.s .~. . 'C3 N C r ft5 1. D 4-I .~ ~ ~~. N "U N -~ •> ~ til L~ f? CU . ~ .~ r- 3 J i ~ 7 n U h. N ~ r ~ i i O l.7 +.~ U C rt3 rJ 4- 7 t/l C .~. +J O1 .~ can c rts i to -. E > ~ z_ rts e C) +J Q/ ~I ~ y ~ C ~ b ~° o S. N ~ ~ ~, O ~ c7 O 41 S_ -.7 .f] w ~ _E ~, .C O N ~ <t E ~ dJ C U ~ •r n. ~ 1.1- _7 ~ Q Q I LL_ 1 .. ' ., 7 '~ tr Qa n r V d. >, 7 ~~ ~. K N :~i p ~ v J WW a z- Q~ N o Fhr~ _il¢i o 4 OIY t ~ ul J O 7 _ __ . R J .. _ . . O « Cl 0 } _ J .-, p .j ri ~ p a V a ~a 0 < -w ~ __ a z x u a o a r O o O K O J a i ~ ~ rr ~ e ~ W T. e u ~ ¢ U v w 4 o z w a z ' ' _. o J Yl a > O w > ~ ;~ a o~ i _u ~, In J W a" Z ~•- .. 7 V z 2 c U Z ~ _ w rc 2 2 .. w a as W y J a E ~ O a V ?. Q u W, In a. Q `! ~ U ¢ a a d UlJ U C~ U 4 - ~ i a ti t, C .. ei ri - ~ e a .. tll Q- 5 a .L. -~ p W u W j ~.? U.I ~ w J a ice, as ? o R J O <2 ._-_ 2 ~.. nn ~ .. ~ W f r lJ d vi ~ ~ N Q z ~ p y a J . ti. r•- ~ _ Z IL ~ a O z o .\ g Y U a x O 0. e N ~ ~ 1 rt U o0 2 0 V W L >ao ~ U ~ _ '" L ~ w ut CI a G W Q W n 4 z ~ Z ' z ~ O Z N a .,. p U V o N U ~~ 7 a U r. _-- = c U Z ¢. W . ~ ~ ~ 1 u a a a a a J a ~ ' Q ~ 6 w u m ul a ° J i 'r ~ `~ rc ° n u ~ Q a p b' a 'r lJ an t: V. . U F -. rt " r a !- < . - ~ - -- - "'" i F - _ ' ~ a U 1 u w . -- - O ,~ L ~ O :~ a a ~ > O K ¢ t^ J W~~ uJ ~~ ~ ~ p a ' ~ ~ a s p ~ w N 00 F -- _ W J Z - ~ a 2 J - ~ ' a ` N ti a < - - - - z z a z Qom Q U a v ate„ a o R. _ arc ~ o W z ¢ ti ` _ v ~ " pJ au ~ W~ ~ W a z ' a n ~ - 7 ° ~ ' t i y N W _ - _ Q i- °a u Z `a o a a w . _ . _ _ _ - N t< J a 5 an " 0 w 4 < N N Q ~ U ~ ~ ~ k. O u .. ~ .- N Fl . __ __ ~7 --.-_ ~~~ ~ n p w ;C v J N H' ~! ~ ~ _ u w" " v . Z • K m O ~ ro o` ~ w ~ ~ n o n' er a . -• e 7 ~ I e . ~. a U~ a J H h s Q o ~• i z~ v: -c X •~ 111>~ ;: o ~ a cis o c> i -r_ w ' n: n ... ~ : • a x . ~. ~, ~ ~~ , v- ~ K. tJ t1C] IN ;!! .l C t'J V. ~. n a •t ,_..__ v _._.._ _.~-..____..___ ._. d ~ m ..._ <_i _.~ . ri ___ l~~_.._._.....___..._..__..__...~..__._. ~. _ , , PART III ANNUAL GOAt_S FOR HOUSI~{G ASSISTANCE ~. This portion o~f the Housing Assistance Plan is to establish realistic annual goals in order to meet some of the housing needs identified in Part II. The constraints on setting realistic goals are: 1. Lack of information on funding availability from HUD. 2. HUD allocation and distribution funds to Richfield and the rest of the metropolitan area.. . 3, Capability and capacity of Richfield in undertaking a housing. assistance program. Given these constraints, and the identified need for assisting 1,129 hou.eholds as shown'in Part II, the.following goals are proposed (and shot~n on Table III): • Firs; Year Goal s 1. Utilize the existing housing stock through the Section 8 Existing Housing Program on a scattered basis. '2. Serve elderly as well as non-elderly in approximate proportion tv need. 3. Begin rehabilitation program to improve substandard housing through the use of Community Development Siock Grant Fu»ds. ~.. Construct ne,v building of 150 units for elderly. _. Three Year Goals 5. Construct 5 homes for larger families on"sites scattered throughout Pichfield. G. Complete rehabilitation of 76 homes throughout Richfield through the use of Community Development Block Grant funds and }Y1innesota }sousing Finance Agency rehabilitation loans. "l. Go!~pl e ;.e rehab i 1 i tat-; on of DD rental housing units through Section 8 Substantial Rehabilitation Program. I • Form Approved • •. ORIB Na. C3f!•147) Pnge l of 2 pokes - ~ ~ ~ U.S.~DEPA(tTMENT OF HOUSING AND URItAN DEVELDPMENT - HOUSINGASSISTANCE FLAN TABLE ifl. GUALS FOR LOWER INCOb1E HOUSING ASSIS7A11CE C!)RRENT YEAR GOAL .• ~ s. .. ' j ti ti r ' ~' r , , i i. NAM£ OF APP LICANT -! 9. ~~ ORIGINAL • City of Richfield -- r ~ l_I AMEN pM EN T, OATC-: f 2. APP LIC AI'ION/GRANT NUM UE. ft''''~`'f~-f~~~--.~~~-~ ~~~~~ ' 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 4. PROGFt AM YEAR FROM: 70: NUMF3ER OF tIOUSEHOL DSTO E,E ASSISTED ' ALL EL OERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE NOUSEHOLpS HANDICAPPED (.j or'jcss (5 or more (!-2 per>uns) persons) p ersans) A. NEW i2EJ1TAL UNITS - t Scction $-HUD l. -_ - --- _ 2 _ 2. S~otc Ager,tx_Totpl (Sam.o~lines_a and b) -_ -. ---- 3 0. Section 8 hfiFA --- - - a ~. Other -- __ 3• Dther Assisted New Rento! Hoassng ~ (Identify) .'T'otol ~ - ~--- - e o _^ e Q._Total (Berm of lines (, 2, and 3) - 8. kEHAB1Lt7ATI0K OF RENTAL UNITS _ _ s 1. 5cuion 8-HUD 5D _.-1-~- - -- to 2. Stale Agency-Tots! (Sum.o/ lines a and b) _- --- 11 a. Section ~ -^----' 12 }~. Othet --_ - --- 3. Qiher QSSiS:eLt R~hobilit.ati.on Iii 2cntol Housing - 13 I s ---_ _ - - - ---- b, - ~ ~ 2- is tl. l-otnl (Sum o/ lines 1, 2, and -3) ~a-~ a.1._-- ----~i C. EXISTING RENTAL Itt1ITS _ n 1. Section 8-HUD -3fl -1.2-._ fib- _ ---2-- -- re 2. State A enc Tolot (Sum c'f tones a and b) ~ ~ - ~ Is - _ _ o. Section 8 -_- _ I ` zo h. Other -- ~ 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rentol dousing ~ , (Identify) -Total _- I -----' --..-.-.-.._...( ~ 22 0. - ---- ---- -------------! 24 ~. -fatal (Sum of Lines 1,2, and 3) ~~ 12^ ----~- ----~---,~ D. REfiAF1ILITATION l.SSISTANCE 70 HOMEOWNERS OR TR_OS_PECTIYE HOhtEOwNERS - - 2s 1. CD Block Grants 8 -~-- ----~•---- 27 3. Other Re)IObililotion Assistance to Homeowners or ('rospective homeowners (Irlenti fyJ - Totol _ _ .._ 2t< ns ~ ~ oa 44 n ~'G -~.~-----1 zy a. b, Grants 7.? >__-- 4-._ - .%..___.I 1---- 3o Q, Tote! (Sum of fires f-, 2, and .T) 64 ,~..--.._ 3~L- ..Z._..-_: - 1 [. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE 70 HUMEOWNERS OR ~ 111 PROSPECTIVE HOj.tE05YNEF2S ----'~- --- ^ 3t 1. SccriorL235 - -- --- ---------• 3z 2_Othe_r. (/drnti fpl=Total .--.--------- -- - ----5--- - -- -- . --- -- -- r --_°' ~~ New Horne Program - a. --- _~- _ --- '----- -------- ---? 34 b T _-- --_ - ---_.__-_._.i 95 _ _ 3. ~ 7otol (Sum of lines I and 21 ~' ~~ ~- -r-- -^- - - -..._' 3G t~• ALL. HOUSING ASSIS'ft.NCE GOALS ~~ (Sum of fines A4,13'•j, f.4, U4, uhd E.3) 2b 149 39 84 ' - 26% 57% I I/% _ ___ ~ 260 .`___ ,.. ,.. ,., ,:, t, ,_: :I • Q, ~ ff + ~, r (, '. • ~. i ~. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF ROUSING AND UR6AN DEVELOPMENT ' HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCUME HOUSING ASSfSTANCE 71(REE YEAR GOAL Poge Zer ?pages 1. NAME OF APPLICANT L _ c,ty of R7Chf7eld __ _ _ 9. U ORIGINAL n•AMENOMEN T, DATE: T NUME1 r'. fe 2. APPLICATION/G1tAN 4. PROGRAM YEAR , ~ II ~L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TO:. F ROM : ' ~ NUMOER OF I10USEhlOI DS T06E ASSIST C~D TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE ' - ALL. HOUSEHOLDS EL DERi_v oR HANDICAPPED ((_?Parsons) FAMILY (1 ur lrss Persons) - LARGE FAeAtLY (nor more Persons) (a) - - (6} (c) (d) (e) A. NEYl RENTAL UNITS , 1 Ii~S)!4[LB~.~~ 2 2. State Apenty-Total (.iurn n(lines n and b) _ :_,1,>-jSj__ - a a. Section8 MHFA -_L 5~ 4 6. ~ Other s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (ldrnti(Y) -Total ' - 6 O. ~ v b. 4. Totot (Jura of lines !,?,and 3) '~ 50 ~ 50: 6. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UN175 e ). Section S-HUD --~.3--_--_- .-.- ---2--- to 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of line's a cad b) = t o. Section 8 -- t2 b. Other _ I3 3. Other Assisted Rehobilitotion of Rental tio~sing (1J_ntifYl - Totai _ --__ _ - I4 - -! t O. -__-_ -_-- -____ -.-- --..__'__ t s _ b. - --- ------ te r 4. Total (Su.,r of lines 1,2, and .?; . C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: t7 Section 8-ItUD ~ ). 143 - ~ 4~.-- -_3.6--- ___._4-..-.. to _ _ _ 2. Slate Agency-Total (Snm of [inc.. a ar.d b) __ __ - -- zo Other 6. ._---- -- ?t _ 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (/denti(}•)• Total __ ! - ~ b. ... - -- ----- ze 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,?, and 3) p. REHABfLITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS - -- ±s 1. CD Block Grants 22 6 1 3 ~ =e 2. Section 235 - _ -- ' rt 3. Other Rehobilitation Assistence to Homeowners or Prospective Homeo~mers (IdrntifY) -Total _ ~ ~ a. *MHFA I Cana S _-9 -_5-8 --2~-- 2~ b. MHFA Grants _-2 7o Q: Total (JUrn of linr-s 1,?, nrd 3% E. NEtif CONSTRUCTION. ASSISTANCE TO 1OMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE Hi?A1E0'rINF.-RS - --. -- _ 31 ). Section 235 -- - _ _ 2. Uthcr ldenti v) - Totol --_--. ^ - - ----~---- r I a. N e t~r Home Pro r a m_---~ -~- ---- 5 -~---- ---- ---...... 5----_ J ~ - -- - -- - ------ rs _ -_ 3. Totol (Sum of lines ! and?) 5 ,6 t7 F. ALL HOUSNG ASSISTANCE GOALS (,tiara n/lines rl d, (t i C~l, lt~i, and f',?' -.- PERCENT OF ALL F!OUSEHCLOi 482 ~~~,°o 235 ° 4.9 ~O 205 °J ~'43 42 ao .}~...~ G. EXPLAhlATION OF PRtORI71ES(:Ittncn udditionnl pnl;esJ -~ *These figures furnished by Metropolitan Council. _ -_ ~ ~ UTAn I ~(, f{.1171 ~ ~~^ U.S. OCPARTMCNT OF HOUSING AND Ur{DAN DEVELOPMENT ` lIOUStt1G ASSISTANCE. PLAN • i, f ~ 7AQLE !V - G[NtRAL LUCATiOt•!S FOR i'ROPOSED LOVfiR tNC01AE tiOUStttG 1. HAMS OFAP PLICAN T' ~ - ... - ]. ~(i ORIGINAL ' ~Clty Of Rlchf~eld ~..~ AMENbMtN7, DA7E: '• {, t .. 1 ~ ~ ' 1 2. AT'P1.IC A71.0 N/GF2ANT NU'.t (, F. ii - 4. .f~f10GFfAM YEAR - ~ ~ ~ - _ F,iorl: 1.9 7 6 70: 19 7 8 .A, rPENTIFY GEt{EftAL LOCATIONS ON AtAP IN THIS APF UCATIUN ~ V / ensus Tract tfumbers 3. Herr G.,~stmctian: C ' .~ ' • X248 z .~ 7: Rei=.abilitaiion: Census'iract ttunbers ~~_ X244, 245, 241, 242, 243s24b;247;248,.02;249, 0.1 ;249.02;249,03. . LHN-Park-s ~ Prograrp-Street hmprovement~ • , . ~ 8. EXPLANA710rt OF SELECTION OF GENEF:r.I LOCATIONS • , • L ddcvr Cons'rucl;an ~ . , . 150 unit building fer the elderly. The project trill A proposed ;;. . be designed to serve low and moderate income elderly. the site .toill be located at the intersection of 78th Street and Chicago x -'.Avenue. i'tass transit service is available from i,he site. Shop- . . ing facili=ties are located nearby. - , . ,. •' ~ ~i ... . , t _t .. ~ 2, itciabifitation ' ,Rehabilitation t•:ith community development funds will take- place l' >' I • in census tracks where other community development acticity is # I scheduled. ~Ttiis -includes the census tracks which contain the `' ~ ~ Lyrtdale/Hub/Nicollet commercial area, those schedule neighborhood ~ , park developments and the city's street irnprovement program. ~I ~ ~ ~ ~'~ ' ~ ~ t, . . ,. ' f. iii . . .: ~. ti RES01_UTION N0. i RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROGRAPI AND THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN 4dHEREAS, the City Council of the Cityof Richfield has reviewed the Community Development Plan and Program and the Housing Assistance Plan in accord With the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,. ;nd 4dHEREAS, the City Gounci 1 f`i nds a need to provide comrnuni ty development for the assistance of low-and moderate income people and the elimination of blighting conditions, ,arid tidHEREAS, the City Council finds a need to pro-vide subsidized housing for lo~~r and moderate income people including elderly, and t°dNEREAS, the .City Counci 1 wi 11 nevi e~~r the.. Gommu;~ i ty Deve1 opm~:nt Plan. and Program a.nd the Housing Assistance Plan on an annual basis, acrd .... . I~HEREAS, the Community Deve1 oprnent Plan and Program and tfie HJUS~Tic~ .ssiStanCO Plan will b€ made pat°t of Hennepin County "Jrbao • County" Enti tl ernent Grant application. NObd, THEREfURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Cour:ci! r.f the City of Richfield does hereby adopt the Community Development Plan and Program and the Flouring Assistance Plan and authorize the City h~anaGer to submit a Community Development B1ock.Grant application ar~+d prepare plans to implement the Housing Assistance Plan. Passed by the City Council cf the City of Richfield this 2.711; clay of December, 1976. Laren L. Law l~fay~r ATTI=ST: '(tromas~ J . Moran Gi ty C1 furl; ~~ fi r ~wi~" CITY OF RICHFIELD;: MINNE$OT11 • Office of City Manager ' I Council `Letter No. 402' i - Agenda December 27, 1.976 The Honorable Mayor and' Members of the Giay Council -City of ::Richfield ' Gentlemen:. - Subject: Team Policing Grant Renewal II As council members are aware, the police division of the Public Safety Department has received two one-year federal LEAA grants from the Governor's- ` Crime Commission the past two years. These grants were to support implement- ation of the Team Policing project. This project has achieved several of i.ts stated goals and objectives ahead of schedule:. 'two of the most-significant accomplishments have been an actual reduction in the number of crimes known • to`the Malice; anc; an increase ir: the number-and percentage of known crimes that are solved by the arrest of the criminal. The Team Policing project is eligible for three full years of LEAA funding. The third year application must be submitted to the Governor's Crime Commission by January 3, 1977. If this application is approved, funding will be received for the period September 1, 1977 through August 31, 1978. In the first year, LEAA supported our project with approximately.$35,000. In the second year, nearly $S0, 000 was received. For the third year, the Public Safety Department proposes applying for federal support of approximately $60,000. C~Lc(4~ l ~ ~O,dDtl~ The specific details of the budget for the triird year federal share of the project are presently being developed. Most of the federal funds .requested will .be .for either-one time capital outlay costs, not requiring continuing city funding after expiration: of the LEAA funds, or a continuation of personnel-costs funded in the first two years of the project. It is the recommendation of the Public Safety Director, in which I concur, that the council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the staff to submit the grant app~jcation by the January 3, 1977 deadline.. Final approval of the grant will not take place until late spring of 1977. Respectfully submit d, ~~ 4 • Wayne S . Burggra a ff . City Manager cc; Public Safety Director ,.. __ t RESOLUTION OF SPONSORSHIP FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA To Act As Grantee For The Project Entitled ' TEAM POLICING SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Richfield Department of Public Safety is submitting an application for third year funding of the Richfield Team Pal7cing .System, and WHEREAS,' the Richfield Department of Public Safety has requested the City of Richfield to act as grantee for this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Richfield act as sponsoring unit of government and grantee for the project entitled Team Policing III to be conducted by the Richfield Department of Public Safety during the period from September 1, 1977. through August 31,.1978. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Manager of the City of Richfield are hereby authorized and directed to execute such an agreement as requested by the Governor's Commission on Crime Prevention and Control to implement said project, if awarded. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th .day of December, 1976. Loren L. Law - Mayor Attest; Thomas J. Moran - City Clerk n :f CITY`0F RICHFIELD, ~INNESO~'A Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 401 Agenda December 27, 1976` I The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Cray Council. City of Richfield Gentlemeri: ~ - Subject; Recommended Denial of Application for Taxicab Driver License Mr. George H. Daly,- Rush City, MN. is listed on the December 27, 1976 city council agenda as an applicant for a new taxicab driver license. _ Investigation conducted as part of the license a.pplicaticn process has substantiated the fact that: 1VIr. Daly has extensive convictions in both the criminal and traffic areas.. Therefore, it is recommended that the city. council deny this application for a taxicab driver license with the recomm- endation it be reconsidered in a year if Mr. Daly .wishes to reapply at that time . 'Respectfully subm~: ed; ~'~ ~• y CITY OF,RiCHFIELD, MINNEuOTA Office of City. Manager Council Letter N~. 400 Agenda December 27, 1976 The Honorable Niayor and Meis;bers of the City Council City of Richfield ` ,Gentlemen: Subject; New Home Program Agreement In July of I975, the city council and the HRA entered into an agreement establishing a..New Home Program.,;This agreement provided for the creation: of a $1.00,000 revolving fund to finance the New Hame Program and also -outlined the goals of the program and criteria: to be followed in purchase of . New. Home Program property. The ,original,agreement has an expiration date of December, 1976. The purpose of this council letter. is to request the city council to extend the agreement with- the HRA for an additional two years until January, 1979. Respectfully submitted, S~: ~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja - cc: Planning Director . Finance IDirector . , ~ C;I'i'Y ~,7F RT..C.;tiFlrlrl7, 1!'1~~1TtiESOTA • 'Gffice of City Manager Council Letter No. 226 Agenda July 14, 1975 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ..'City of Richfield Gentlemen:_ Subject: New Home Program At the June 23, 1975 Housing and Radevoopment Authority meeting the IiRA. appro~=ed an agreen~~rit with the city to establish. a fund for the purpose of .carrying out the rJew Home Program. This agreement is on the city council'.. agenda for consideration and actin by the cit~T council. Members of the city coui~.cil received a detailed report on the l~Tevv Homy ~'. Program in preparation for the June 23 I3RA meeting . lr. summary, the attached agreement provides for establishment of a fund of up to $100, 000 to support. • the New Home Program. The anticipated sources of funds for establishing ordtown lots -owned new F cit a in would b~ th., sale of cert y the revolving fund less city costs and a community development block grant of $S0, 000. It is recommended that the city council approve the agreement-and 'authorize. the Mayor and City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the city.. Respectfully submitted, -~ ~ ... t '4 ~~r ~~ f,..,. ;. ~" `~.J ~(ayne S. Burggraaff City Manager EXHIBIT A . i .? ' A. Selection of Criteria for Buildings-and Vacant Lots • 1. That the building selected is substandard as to condition, size. _ ~~ and usage on the real property on which it is located; 2. That the building selected is obsolete and of faulty design for ~ , the block and area in which it is located, 3. Than the building selected is a deteriorating factor which has • caused blight to the lot on which it is located and could least to .the spread of blight or tipping conditions of other properties abutting this property; A. Than-the building selected is detrimental to safety or health of the abutting properties in the block; .. 5 That the parcel selected, when acquired,f vaould become a marketable , . lot on which to build a new structure compatible to the neighborhood; 6. That all acquisitions be made on a voluntary basis;. 7 That the absolute write-down on acquisition and relocation costs . .~ shall not eyceed 50% of properties real value unless approved by the city . . ~ All properties considered for negotiations shall meet at least four of the cri eria h throu ors thr g ough seven, and for all vacant lots at least three of the criteria one • seven. ~ B. Operating Guidelines The authority will seek properties through field survey, public contacts and publicity as needed, to add to its resource of possible acquisitions. The authority shall follow as a guide in selecting properties the principle that a feasible sale price of the developed property shall be consistent- with the marketability of properties within the. surrounding area . The authority shall prepare a general operating plan which may include: 1. ~ An inventory of vacant residential substandard buildings. " 2. An inventory of occupied substandard residential buildings. 3. An inventory of vacant lots. ~!. Goals and evaluation procedure. ~._~ ~ 5. A set of policies ,and. administrative procedures Tn no case shall the authority proceed with the purchase of land or buildings until such a plan is approved by the -city. • . THE. AGREEMI:TdT, made this day of ' l9 '. by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in-and for _. the City of'Richfield, a.body politic and corporate. under the laws of the State of Minnesota, party of the first .part,. hereinafter __ called :'The Authority", anc~ the City, of Richfield,. a municipal. corporation, under the laws of the State of I~iinnesota, party of the second-part, hereinafter called "The City". ~• WITIdESSETFi s _ • ..WHEREAS, the Authority has the powers under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.44.5, Subdivision l ('~) , caifhin its area of operation, and without the adoption.of an urban renewal. _ plant, to acquire, other.than by the exercise of the power of eminent domain and v~ithout the adoption of a resolution provided for .~:n Subdivision 1 (6) of said section, real property, and to demolish, . remo~re, rehabilitate or reconstruct the buildings and improvements •ar to construct new buildings or improvements thereon, or tograde,~" fi~.l and construct foundations or otherwise prepare the site for improvements, and to dispose of said property. pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.425, provided that the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.525 requiring conformance to an urban renewal • -,..plant shall not apply, and to finance such activities by means of . the redevelopment project fund or by. means of tax increments or tax ,increment bonds or by the methods of financing provided for in -`e Minnesota Statutes, Section 46?..545, or by means of ccsntributions from ~~ • ~ _~ - .. 2 -~ .. a municipality, provided fax in Minnesota Statutes, Section ~,,,~ ` 462.581 (9) , '`or by any- combination of such means; provided tha~,~ real property aitiz bui~.dngs or .improvements thereon shall only be acquired when the buildings or .improvements are substandard. Tor- . the purpose.af this subparagraph, substandard buildings or improve- ments mean buildings or ~.mprovements that are dilapidated or obsolescent, faultily designed;lacking adequate ventilation, light or sanitary facilitates', or any comk~ination of these or other factors that. are. detrimental to the safety or .health of. the communwtY; V7~-iEIE~AS,,- the Aut}~ori.ty has the power under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, Subdivision 4 {2) within its area of operaition to determine where substandard, slum or blighted .. areas exist or where there is unsafe, unsanitary or ove~croVrdEd • • housing; and - . ; .. - - - , , WHEREAS, the City is authorized under the provisions of _. • "Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.581 (9) to furnish funds available to it from any source, to ari autharity to pay all or-any .part of - .the cost of the Authority of the activities authorized by riinnesota•_ s - ~r Statutes, Section 462.445 Subdivision 1-{7); and.. WFiEREAS, th.e City has certain funds available for the'executian . cf .a New Home Program; and ~ ~ . •~ ..WHEREAS, the .City a.s desirous of transferring.to the authority certain sums of money. as hereinafter provided for the purpose of .'.carrying out said-New home Prograr7~rithin the area of operation of r the Authority; - ~ f - .>i • . • 1 ,: • NOI~',.TH~REFORE, IT IS HEREBX AGREED,-between the parties ~ . ~~~ herd o as follows: ~.. .• The City, upon execution of ,this agreement, shall provide, `- as such funds: become available to it, the sum of not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000} to the_Authority. The source of said funds shall be: (a~ $5.0,,000 .from Communi~y Development B3ock Grants,.:: or such suzn as is ~ecexti=ed by the City i n s~ach grants ir_ the ' Hv Community Development program year of 1975-1976. " ~• (b). The proceeds of the sale of city-owned parcels of land 3cnown as "Surplus Metropolitan Airports Commission Property"; provided, however, that. if said parcels are • .transferred to the Authority for sale, any sale praceeds ini " excess of the amount necessary to supply the total sari of X100,000 specified in this paragraph shall be transferred - .. ~ by .the Authority to the City. If, for any reason, the Community Development Grants specified above are not made available {:o the city in the program .year 1975-1976 this agreement -- - shall be of no effect. Funds provided pursuant to this paragraph shall be used to defray all costs of the new home program. . ". ~ ~ ~ " . ~ . ~ (a)" ",'he Authority, upon the receipt of said funds, shall undertake performance hereunder; and shall continue to provide. such staff, facilities and assistance as .in its opinion are needed to carry out the activities of the New Home Program, until such time . ~ • ~ • •o • • • i i .. ~~ • ,'~ as the Agreement is terminated a$ provided. for-herein. `. r,,, (b) The-Authority shall return all monies received by --~~ it in the course of this. contract to the account and fund originally supplied by the City, to be used as a'revolving fund in_'carrying .~ out `the- terms of this contract: . 3. The. Authority shall keep accounting records of all funds received, and additional records in such detail as may be reasonably required by the City. ~ . 4. The Authority shall make, in such detail .as may be ~ - reasonably required by the City,-and forward. to the City an annual" report in writing as to the actual progress of the. Authority with- . respect to the idew Home Program. 5. This Agreement may be terminated by either .party upon 60 • days written notice. 'Upon termination of the contract, the Authority ~.' shall pay to the City all money remaining in the fund established by Paragraph 1 and 2 (b) of this contract. - ~ 6. The administrative costs of the authority shall not exceed •an average of seven percent of•the purchase price of all property - acq~zired under this Agreement. - - ~ . 7. .The Authority agrees to hold the City of Richfield harmless ' from any and•~all claims or lawsuits that might result. from activities under this Agreement. 8. The City of Richfield agrees to hold the•Autharity harm-- less from any and all claims or lawsuits that might result from any activities of the City of Richfield under this .Agreement. • J ~~ ~ f w ,~ . . "~: ~' :. 9. Tlz:i,s ~greentcnt incorporates ky reference the provision :of,, the • document entitled "Terr2s o~ Operation attached hereto as ExhYai~: '~"'• "1~" anal rmade apart hereof.'$ .This I~greement shah. also i,~COrporate axzd.be subject to all the provisions in Part x2, hereto attached. . xN WITNESS Vv'HEREOF the patties have on the day and year first above.'written duly.. executed 'this Agreenieiit by their duly .authorized ~nf~.~icers. - . T~-iE 'ROUSING 1~ND REDEVEL~JPI~.EiQT - - ALTIiOHxTy IN 11~~D .FOR TIE rI~.['Y , ... - OF 221CH~~ZELD .. _ ~y ~~~ Its (,haa.rman ... ~ ~y { ~" Its Secretary - - _ CITx' {iF RICFik'iELD .. • ~ $y - Mayor . f - - - ~. ', -: ~ City Clerk .. ~ ~. Countersigned - ~. :; 4 - ~ City Manager . -, ~ . ti ,Approved as to Legality } -- -- .~ a City Aiao'rney , -' I .~- ,, CITY CaF RICHI`IELD,, MINNESOTA Office~;of City IVlanager Council. Letter No. 398 Agenda December 27, 1976 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council -City of Richfield Gentlemen: Sub}ect: Bid Award for`Radio Paging System On December 8, 1976 the single bid for the radio paging system for the .public safety department fire division' was opened. As council members may' recall,' this system. will provide a personal radio receiver` :(paging device) for each member of the fire division. During fire .emergencies when it becomes necessary. to recall off-duty fire division :personnel, this paging system will enable the department to simultaneously and. instantlyalert either selected ~i members of the division, or a'll off-duty personnel. The-radio .paging:.alert system will. tremendously .improve the recall ..capability of, the public safety department and assure a more. efficient and timely response to fire emergencies. The single bid that was received by the. city for this radio paging system 'was submitted'by 1Viotorola, Inc., in the amount of $9,135.00. The bid in- eludes 28:-radio pagers and 28 charger amplifiers and meets the city's specif- ications in all; respects. The system proposed by Motorola is comipletely compatible with the current radio communication capabilities of the, public _ safety department. It is , therefore., the recoanmendation of the Public Safe y .Director,, in which I concur, that 'the bid for the radio paging system in the amount of $9,135 be awarded to Motorola, Inc. Respectfully submitted, e G dam` ~~ ,~~ \~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WS8/e ja cc; Public Safe y Director _I'inanice Director Administrative Assistant ,~-" ,~ CITY OF RICHFIELD: Bid. Opening December 8, 1976 Radio Pagers and Chargers , Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative staff T,aas called by Peter Eberz, Acting City Manager, who announced that. the purpose of"the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids on Radio Pagers and Chargers as advertised in the official-newspaper on November 17, 1976. Present: Peter Eberz, Acting City Manager Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director I. F. Raesler, Environmental Health Director Richard Simpson, Fire Chief Paul Linnee, Administrative Assistant Thomas J. Moran., City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read .aloud: BIDDER AND RADIO CHARGER BID .SECURITY PAGERS AMPLIFIERS General Electric No Bid Air Conan ~ No' Bid Motorola Company B.B. 5% $7,551.60 $1,583.40 The Acting City Manager announced that the bid would be tabulated and considered at the regular council meeting of December i3, 1976. • _ i Thomas J. Moran City Clerk. w i C - -'~ ~_ CITY OF RICHFIELD,:. r~IINNESOTA ~. ~ - Officer of City Manager ` Council Letter No. '397 .Agenda December 27, "1976 Thee. Honorable ~\/ia~ror and Mem`ber~ of the City Council City of Richfield " .Gentlemen: Subject: Renewal of an Agreement -with the State of Minnesota Departmen of Transportation for Occasional Technical and Engineering Assistance - The. Minnesota. Department of Transportation- has been authorized by the State Legislature to .provide occasional technical and engineering assistance tcs`ci.ties, upon request. .The, attached copy of a technical and Engineering assistance agreement prepared by the Department of Transportation provides a procedure for utilization .of such services. Services would .be paid for on the basis of expenses incurred. This agreement is the same as .that authorized by the city council in 1975 and 1976. - This agreement with the.. transportation department is not unlike ;several other informal arrangements which the city-has with other governmental juris- dictions: For example, the City of Richfield annually reimburses Hennepiri County. for painting lines on streets. .This agreement with the IVlinnesota lie- partment of_ Transportation might be used to receive technical and engineering assistance with respect to city Owned traffic signals,: or traffic signal systems, from state traffic engineers. 6 r he'1976 'I t h' a eme i i976 fer hotolo in str..et.~ i i e cit did use t as re nt n Th g gg P Y g permanent street paving area., at a cost of approximately $2SO. It'is anticipated that the agreement will enable us to use the same service. again in 1977. It is recommended that the .city. council authori?e the Mayor and City Manager: .to';renew the agreement and adopt the attached resolution authorizing the use of ' transportation department services when necessary - - - ~lte pectfully s muted, ~. ~~~. Wayne S, i3urggraaf City ":Manager RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REQUEST .FOR. NEEDED TECHNICAL ATD AND ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE FROM. THE MINNESOTA HIGHWAX DEPARTMENT BE IT RESOLVED, That pursuant. to statutory authority, the City Engineer for and on behalf of the City of Richfield is hereby authorized to request and obtain from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, needed engineering and technical services when desirable to obtain such services, for which payment will be made by the City of Richfield of Richfield upon receipt of verified claims from the Commissioner of Transportation. Passed by the-City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of Decem'oer, 1976. u Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk ^ x - - _. , Mn/DOT . 30780 (ii/76) STATE. OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT' Of l"RANS~ORI'A710N TECHNICAL P,ND ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT THIS RGREEMENT made and entered into by and between fhe Stafie of Minnesota acting through i_ts CommissFoner of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State", end the County or City of , hereinafter referred to as the "User", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the User, as evidenced by Resolution, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, does hereby request the State.. to furnish from time to time as needed and specifically requested, technical a-id eng.ineering assistance pursuant to M.S. 161.39; and WHEREAS, The State 1s authorized to provide technical and engineering assistance to other road authorities by M.S. 161.39, and is willing to do so; NOW, 1"HEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by the parties hereto that: I. The State shah , upon written request by the User, provide technical and engineering assistance and such other services as authorized by M.S. 1&1.39. 2. The State shall keep a record of its costs and expenses, including overhead costs, in providing assistance and services to the User pursuant to Paragraph i above, and shall prepare an itemized statement thereof showing the amount due hereunder and submit the same to the User on a (monthly) (annual) basis. 3. The User agrees to pay to the Trunk Highway Fund of the State of Minnesota ail monies duce hereunder and as shown by the invoices or statements submitted to if~e lfser, within 30 days after such submission. Page No. i ,:. . ,, Y - r y !N WITNESS WHEREOF, the State and the User have caused these presents to be.executed by i-heir rQSp©ctive afftcPrs, COUNTY -CITY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA gy g v (Chairman or President) ~ Commissioner of Transportation B tAuditor or City Cierk) y (State Aid Engineer) Date Date tCorporate Seal) • Approved as to form and execution: . i3y ~' - tAssistant Attorney GeneraO Page No. 2