Loading...
4-18-17 AgendaCCOOMMMMUUNNIITTYY SSEERRVVIICCEESS CCOOMMMMIISSSSIIOONN AAGGEENNDDAA Regular CSC Meeting Tuesday, April 18, 2017, 7:00 pm Richfield Municipal Center (Heredia Room), 6700 Portland Ave Commission Members Staff/Others Liaisons Reed Bornholdt (Chair), Anne Basso, Danielle Indovino Cawley, Joannette Cintrón de Núñez, Carolyn Engeldinger, Art Felgate, Emma Nollenberger, Lisa Rudolph, Dan Smieja, Darwin Schaeferlane, Michele Thompson (Vice Chair) Jim Topitzhofer (Staff Liaison) John Evans (Secretary) Chris Link (Public Works) Edwina Garcia (City Council) Crystal Brakke (School Board) 1. Approval of Minutes/Agenda  Regular Meeting Minutes: March 21, 2017 2. Public Comment  Resident comment and items not printed on agenda 3. Staff Reports  Recreation Services (Topitzhofer) 4. Action Items  Capital Improvement Plan (Topitzhofer) 5. Discussion Items  GreenStep Cities Status Report (Topitzhofer) 6. Committee Reports  Transportation Commission (Felgate)  FOWL Board (Engeldinger)  Planning Commission (Cintrón de Núñez)  Arts Commission (Rudolph)  Friendship City Commission (Topitzhofer/Schaeferlane) 7. Next Meeting Tuesday, May 16, 7:00 pm Richfield Municipal Center (Heredia Room), 6700 Portland Avenue 8. Adjournment March 21, 2017 REGULAR COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 21, 2017 Richfield Municipal Center (6700 Portland Ave) PRESENT CSC: Reed Bornholdt, Art Felgate, Michele Thompson, Dan Smieja, Danielle Indovino Cawley, Carolyn Engeldinger, Anne Basso, Darwin Schaeferlane, Emma Nollenberger, Joannette Cintrón de Núñez STAFF: Jim Topitzhofer, John Evans COUNCIL: Edwina Garcia ABSENT CSC: Danielle Indovino Cawley, Lisa Rudolph SCHOOL BOARD: Crystal Brakke PLAN COM: Rick Jabs Call to Order Chair Bornholdt called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Approval of Minutes/Agenda Felgate moved, seconded by Basso, to approve the minutes of the regular February minutes. Approved, ayes all. Thompson moved, seconded by Felgate, to approve the agenda for tonight’s meeting. Approved, ayes all. Staff Reports Recreation Services Topitzhofer reported on the following: Band Shell Bid Opening: Bid opening for the fourth remaining section of the bandshell project was yesterday (3/20), after the carpentry section came in too high at the first bid opening. The lowest bid was $26,500 too high. Topitzhofer will present a report to the City Manager tomorrow and present the bids to the Council to decide how to proceed. Action Items Nicollet Avenue Crosswalk Grant Application Topitzhofer said that he and Jack Broz, Transportation Engineer, wrote a grant application and submitted it to Blue Cross Blue Shield to help fund a crosswalk at 73rd Street and Nicollet Avenue. He said that the grant is intended to promote healthy and safe living in communities; the project for which the application was submitted is a temporary pilot program for a crosswalk near the Augsburg Library, which would also serve high school students and Augsburg Park students. Felgate said that the project, as discussed by the Transportation Commission, fits the objectives of the Master Bike/Pedestrian Plan and the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Topitzhofer said that, being a county road, there is not major work scheduled for Nicollet in the near future that would provide an opportunity to add a crosswalk. He said that these pilot projects provide an opportunity to educate people about a new amenity and traffic pattern to evaluate how it’s used and received. He said that this would be a refuge crosswalk, or an area in the middle of the road that provides a pedestrian a place to stop halfway across the street. He said that a demonstration project like this could help convince the county to include such an amenity when there is major work done on Nicollet. He said that it’s not asphalt or concrete, but some type of temporary material. Smieja said that, at the beginning of the school year, the students have to review a pedestrian safety program, which may be incorporated to emphasize the education component of the project. Felgate said that studies like this lend weight to proposals to the county when piggybacking on their projects. Topitzhofer said that he would like a motion to formally include a statement of support from the Community Services Commission in the application. Basso moved, seconded by Schaeferlane, to support such a project and the grant application to fund it. Approved, ayes all. Discussion Items Parks Master Plan Revision Process Topitzhofer said that a meeting was held with the Comprehensive Guide Plan consultant to outline the process for revising the plan, including the Parks Master Plan. He said that a steering committee, comprised of residents and staff, has been identified to solidify the timeline. He said that the outline includes significant community outreach efforts, including open houses, focus groups, workshops, and listening sessions to gather input about the parks system and the things people like about the parks and suggest for the future. He said that the timeline includes a meeting with the Community Services Commission to prioritize ideas and objectives. He said that the idea is to involve the public throughout the entire process. He said that the process will include visiting all of the parks, collecting data, conducting field studies, and reporting on the existing park facilities. He said that staff will be doing a thorough audit of the City’s park and playground equipment and structures. He said that the consultant then starts to assemble the scope of such improvements, including cost estimates and timelines. He said that the consultant would complete the Parks Master Plan by year’s end. Felgate suggested incorporating some “smart-city” components into the plan. Commission Participation at Penn Fest and Fourth of July Topitzhofer said that Sara Gumke, Vice Chair of the Human Rights Commission, has asked all boards and commissions to consider having a presence at the two largest community events: Penn Fest and the Fourth of July. Bornholdt asked the group to consider if they might be available during these two events. Committee Reports Transportation Commission: Felgate provided the report. Friends of Wood Lake: Engeldinger provided the report; distributed invitations to the FOWL Dinner on April 28. Planning Commission: Cintrón de Núñez volunteered to be the liaison to the PC again in 2017. Arts Commission: Bornholdt read Rudolph’s report. Friendship City Commission: Schaeferlane: the soccer player statue will be dedicated on June 24. Next Meeting/Adjournment Regular April Meeting Tuesday, April 18, 7:00 pm, Richfield Municipal Center (6700 Portland Ave) Adjournment Thompson moved, seconded by Basso, to adjourn. Meeting adjourned by consensus at 8:16. DRAFT MINUTES UNTIL APPROVED BY THE CSC. RICHFIELD COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Meeting Date: April 18, 2017 Agenda Item 2017–2021 Parks Capital Improvement Plan Agenda Section Action Items Attachments None Contact Jim Topitzhofer Recommended Action Motion to recommend the below Capital Improvement Plan to the Planning Commission. One of the annual tasks of the Community Services Commission is to review and revise a portion of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that is related to park improvements. We do this at the beginning of every year. The plan encompasses five years and is limited to $450,000. Our portion of the CIP is funded by proceeds of the City's four liquor stores. Staff has discussed park needs and recommends the following plan: A brief explanation of each line item follows. Energy High Existing Outside Project Safety Savings Use Asset Funding Cost 2018 Parks Maintenance X X $45,000 Wood Lake Fence Repair & Tree Removal X X $5,000 Rink 1 Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration X X X X $300,000 Parks Master Plan Improvement Items ? ? ? ? ? $100,000 Total 2018 $450,000 2019 Parks Maintenance X X $45,000 Wood Lake Fence Repair & Tree Removal X X $5,000 Rink 1 Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration X X X X $300,000 Parks Master Plan Improvement Items ? ? ? ? ? $100,000 Total 2019 $450,000 2020 Parks Maintenance X X $45,000 Wood Lake Fence Repair & Tree Removal X X $5,000 Rink 1 Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration X X X X $300,000 Parks Master Plan Improvement Items ? ? ? ? ? $100,000 Total 2020 $450,000 2021 Parks Maintenance X X $45,000 Wood Lake Fence Repair & Tree Removal X X $5,000 Rink 1 Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration X X X X $300,000 Parks Master Plan Improvement Items ? ? ? ? ? $100,000 Total 2021 $450,000 2022 Parks Maintenance X X $45,000 Wood Lake Fence Repair & Tree Removal X X $5,000 Rink 1 Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration X X X X $300,000 Parks Master Plan Improvement Items ? ? ? ? ? $100,000 Total 2022 $450,000 A summary of each item follows:  Parks Maintenance – Significant ongoing repairs of existing park facilities including trail resurfacing, court resurfacing, roof replacement, parking lot re-construction, etc. This has been a regular item in the CIP since 1999.  Wood Lake Fence Repair and Tree Removal – A chain-link fence was installed around the perimeter of Wood Lake Nature Center over 30 years ago. The fence is often a target for fallen trees. Ongoing funds are needed to keep the fence in good repair.  Rink 1 Conversion to Indirect Refrigeration- Richfield is one of 120 ice arenas that are required to change its refrigeration system to avoid the use of R22 refrigerant. The cost to convert to another system is about $3,000,000.  Parks Master Plan Improvement Items - The City is beginning the process to revise the parks master plan. In addition, an audit of all City-owned play equipment is in progress to determine safety compliance, condition and recommendations. This information will be very helpful in determining the priority of future improvements to the parks system. Age Atta Rec Minn achie publ com tailor innov The reac prac dem enda Item: achments: commended nesota Gree eve their sus ic-private pa pleting one o red to all Min vation. City of Rich ched Step 2 ctices to be r onstrate the RICHFIE GreenStep C GreenStep d Action: N nStep Cities stainability a artnership, is or more acti nnesota citie field entered by completin recognized a e program’s w ELD CO EX M Cities Status Cities Statu None – Disc s is a volunta and quality-o s based upon ons at a 1, 2 es, focus on d the Minnes ng 8 best pra as a Step 3 C website. MMUNI XECUTI Meeting Da s Report us Report cussion Only ary challenge of-life goals. n 29 best pr 2 or 3-star le cost saving sota GreenS actices. The City. Jim To TY SERV IVE SUM ate: April Agen Conta y e, assistanc This free co ractices. Eac evel, from a l s and energ Step Cities P e City is in th opitzhofer wi VICES C MMARY 18, 2017 da Section: act: Jim Top ce and recog ontinuous im ch best pract list of four to gy use reduc Program in 2 he process o ll present a s COMMIS : Discussion pitzhofer gnition progr provement p tice can be i o eight action ction, and en 012. Since of completing status repor SSION n Items am to help c program, ma implemented ns. These ac ncourage civ then, the Ci g an additio rt (see attach cities anaged by a d by ctions are vic ty has nal 8 best hed) and wil l 1    2017 Category A City: RICHFIELD   Currently a Step Two GreenStep City as of June 2016  joined 1/10/12    Which assessment?    Preliminary: for city review                Final: May 1st recommendation to LMC      Assessor and date:    Philipp Muessig, 12/8/16     Total BPs done:                    All required* BPs done?                       BP distribution requirement* met?    Recommend new recognition at:      Step 3     Recognition at a Step 3 level involves, at a minimum:   Implementing 16 best practices, including:  o 10 specific BPs:  #1, #6, #11, #12, #15, #16, #17, #24, #25, #29  o 2 Building BPs, 2 Land Use BPs, 2 Transportation BPs, 4 Env. Mgt. BPs, 3 Comm./Econ. BPs   Completing 27 actions, including:  o 9 specific actions:  #1.1 & #1.2;  #6.1 & #6.2;  #11.1;  #15.1;  #24.1 & #24.2, #29.1    * required for Step 3 recognition  Best practices (required)            BP implemented?      Action summary by # and star level achieved       Action rules (req.  actions in bold)                                                                                                  Distribution BPs met?                                                             BUILDINGS: distribution requirement is 2 BPs ;  are 2 BPs done?  1. Public       1 & 2; & one action from 3‐7      NO  1.1   ‐‐ 80 months data, current to Feb. 2015  1.2  COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ new PW Facility has motion sensors, automatic bath sink shut-offs; automatic flushing, low-flow toilets in bathrooms, energy use 30-35% better than standard construction, ground source heat pump, daylighting, 65% demolition materials and construction waste recycled, 10% more open space than required, almost 100% of stormwater retained on site via rain gardens, retention ponds, minimized building footprint, and permeable paving; LED outside lights at Wood Lake Nature Center  1.5   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS – 2008 new Public Works Facility: LEED attributes; occupancy sensors, low-flow water fixtures, state-of-the art HVAC systems, etc. 1.7   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ Public Works facility is heated/cooled by closed-loop/ground source geothermal    2. Private       any two actions    YES  2.1   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS – 2013 Home Energy Squad Enhanced Program (cost-share with residents), up to $200 in additional rebates from the City; after 8 community workshops, approved goal: “The housing stock reflects the community’s commitment to sustainability and healthy living.”  2.2   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ building development review process makes clear proposals evaluated on city’ Comp Plan sustainability goal   2.4   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ Best Buy LEED Gold; Honda LEED- certifiable building expansion  2.5   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – comp plan water conservation goal, & info sent in utility bills; 2010 3-tier conservation rate structure  2.6   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ By July 2013 21 buyers of foreclosed homes received loans; homes rehabbed under MN Housing’s Green   20 NO   YES NO 2    Communities standards     3. New       1 or 2; one from 3‐5  YES 3.1   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ Parks Master Plan policy states that all new buildings include in the planning or process criterion that improves sustainability of materials, energy use, operating cost and lifecycle replacement and natural environmental impact.   3.4   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ Richfield Rediscovered Lot Sale Program offers a $5,000 credit: required – 3+ BR, 2 baths, 2-car garage, complements neighborhood; qualifies for "Green" certification. By July 2013 3 MN Green Path & 1 LEED homes    4. Lighting/Signals       2 actions with one from 5‐8    YES  4.1   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ Code requires outdoor Dark-Sky & metal halide public & private lighting   4.2   underway – study by UofM   4.4   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ City coordinated with Co. & MNDOT to synchronize all of the city traffic signals  4.5   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ 12 LED street lights; one solar traffic sign. It reports speeds of vehicles as they proceed past the sign; LEDs in parking lot of the ice arena/pool.  4.6   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ replaced fixtures on park buildings, well house, Ice Arena with Dark Sky compliant fixtures and LED bulbs  4.7   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ Ice Arena parking lot LED bulbs in 2014  4.8   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS    5. Reuse       any one action  YES 5.5  COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ master plans with design standards for all 6 major commercial areas.                          LAND USE: 2 BPs required;   are 2 BPs done?  6. Comp Plan       Actions 1 & 2  YES 6.1   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS – parks & water conservation sust. goals  6.2   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ City's permit application forms and staff reports reference the importance of compliance with the Comp Plan  6.3   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ coordination via Met Council; Planning Commissions of Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington meet once/yr.; Regional Council of Mayors, 494 Coalition, MAC; city-public & private schools’ Joint Facilities Agreements  6.5   UNDERWAY ‐‐ future energy reduction goals via RII     7. Density       any one action    YES  7.1   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ multi-family districts (by commercial, transit nodes) 23+ DU/A; medium-density residential 7-12 DU/A 7.3   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ Mixed Use Districts include zero lot lines; mixed use & higher residential densities zoned as the predominant land uses in the City's commercial centers envisioned as walkable urban villages 7.4   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ TIF, land write downs, city loans & grants    8. Mixed Uses       any two actions    YES  8.1   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ As matter of policy, the City organizes stakeholder groups for all area plans and master plans  8.3   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ PUDs allow mixed uses, result in R-C adjacency to be consistent with the Comp Plan 8.5   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS – up to 25% mix allowed in R‐C DT development  8.6   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ Mixed Use Districts (located along significant commercial corridors) have hybrid of traditional & form-based YES 3    zoning but do not rely on illustrative diagrams & streetscape requirem’ts   9. Highway Development       any one action  YES 9.1   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ master plans for 2 highway corridors aimed at urban in character, pedestrian-friendly, economically sustainable and ultimately, more livable. City added the Mixed Use Districts in the Zoning Code specifically to implement these policies 9.2   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ -Planning Commissions of Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington meet once per year to discuss border R-C issues.  9.4   historic development patterns in the vicinity of freeway access ramps has been auto-oriented but comp plan & zoning call for mixed use and medium-to-high-density residential    10. Conservation Development        any one action  YES 10.1   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – 2008 NRI; virtually all of the natural areas and high quality open spaces are already protected in public parks  10.3   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ extensive requirements for ID / protection during development of existing on-site trees via landscape plans                                            TRANSPORTATION: 2 BPs required;   are 2 BPs done?   11. Complete Green Streets        1; & two additional actions      YES  11.1   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐“Richfield seeks to enhance the safety, … so as to create a connected network of facilities accommodating each mode of travel…” part of City's 'Sweet Streets' program 11.3   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS – several projects; one 4-2 lanes added bike lanes, sidewalks, multi-purpose trail, green boulevards and cut 1/3 off the non-complete streets budget  11.4   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ CIP funds improvements consistent with comp plan, Bicycle Master Plan, SRTS plan; added a pedestrian bridge & underpass, trail N of freeway  11.6   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ 12 to 11 ft. lanes widths on 5 streets; 2 roundabouts    12. Mobility Options        any two actions      YES  12.1   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS   12.4   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ bicycles at City Hall and at the Public Works Facility for City employee use    13. Fleets        any two actions      YES  13.1   COMPLETE @ 2 STARs ‐‐ AVL technology on 85% of fleet; also used to track/economize salt application; 2 video conference suites  13.2   underway – 2011 U of M study, incl. look at conversions to diesel / CNG; city purchased a dual-fuel mower   13.3   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ monthly monitoring/reporting on fuel usage/costs; training for more efficient driving; maintenance schedules; looking into natural gas conversion; EV charger for employees    14. TOD / TDM        any two actions    YES 14.1   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ parking maximums  14.2   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – comp plan IDs transit routes, calls for mixed use development (incl. denser R) at key commercial/transit nodes.  14.4   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ City may require a traffic management plan to mitigate traffic impacts shown in a study the city may require a developer to prepare                          ENVIRON MGT: 4 BPs required;   are 4 done?  15. Purchasing  15.1     YES NO 4          1; and one additional action    NO 15.5   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ 100% recycled asphalt in contractor specs is practice    16. Trees        any two actions      YES  16.1   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ 27 yrs; annual tree budget of $18/resident  16.3   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS – min. annual budget for replacement trees (about 250); overall canopy about 25%; residential canopy about 70%  16.4   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ trees on both sides of 90% of streets; 700 tree planted during 76th St. reconstruction project.  16.6   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ City arborists provide inspections for public & private properties; 2009 EAB comprehensive prep/response plan (treating boulevard ash trees, oak trees at Augsburg Park)      17. Stormwater        any one action      YES  17.3   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ runoff not to exceed existing conditions for 1/10/100-year storms; if impervious increase over 50% runoff rate must meet pre-development conditions; control facilities must remove 50% of phosphorous 17.4   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ variable fees to encourage maximal on-site treatment; case-by-case incentives; city maintains some stormwater BMPs & bills owners   18. Parks & Trails        any three actions    YES  18.1   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ completed 4 important trail & park links: bike lane link; first regional bike/ped trail link-up; bike lane; vacating a road and creating a greenway space to connect 2 parks  18.2   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ park system funded via 4 muni liquor stores (net profits about $450,000/yr.); goal that new developments have public/private open space; council may require park space dedication or payment in lieu  18.3   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ all residents w/in ½ mile of park/protected green space: 14 areas per 1,000 residents 18.5   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ Parks Plan calls for natural resource preservation & environmental sustainability: turf mgt., fishing, irrigation, WQ improvement project 18.7   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ ice arena retrofitted with energy-saving equipment; rooftop solar panels with display on its Wood Lake Nature Center; grey water system for City Hall  18.8   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ Annual Earth Day Celebration: volunteers remove buckthorn, restore native vegetation, plant trees    19. Surface Water        if state public water:  4; and  one additional action  if no state water:  any one action  NO 19.3   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – City annual report for the Wood Lake Nature Center  19.6   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ City calibration of salters, salt-temperature calculation, alternative types of salt reduced salt application rates by more than 50%   20. Water / Wastewater        1 & 2; and one additional  NO 20.2   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ 2007-2010 7 motors at wells replaced with VFDs for total energy savings of 375,570 kWh; SCADA system; 3 high- efficiency compressors; water plant motion sensors, LEDs 20.4   COMPLETE @ 3 STARS ‐‐ peak shaving program; recycle all the water used for backwashing and from the filter presses  20.7   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐  3-tiered water conservation rate  21. Septics        any one action  NO   22. Solid Waste       1 or 2; & one from 4‐8  YES 22.2   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS – annual race: all materials recyclable, reusable, or compostable, most food organic  5    22.5   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – hauler offers "blue bag" organics recycling services to their residential and commercial customers      23. Local Air Quality        any two actions  YES 23.2   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR   23.3   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS – no tobacco use in City-owned parks                                       ECON & COMM DVLP: 3 BPs required;   are 3 done?  24. Benchmarks & Involvement        Actions 1 & 2    NO 24.1     24.2   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – CIP includes comp plan goals & later sections describes the consistency with these goals for every project to be funded  24.4   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ “A Sustainable Home Improvement Guide” (100p) has sections on Energy Efficiency, Sustainable Supplies and Products, Sustainable Landscaping, and Water Conservation 25. Green Businesses        any two actions    NO    26. Renewable Energy        any two actions  YES 26.1   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR – residential solar shading prohibition in code; U of M study of code with recommendations on wind, solar panels, green roofs / roof gardens, and rain gardens  26.5   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐ City installed solar on Wood L. Nature Ctr     27. Local Food        any one action  YES 27.2   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ permitted use in all zoning districts: Horticulture/community gardens as an accessory to an established institutional use (school, church, park)  27.3   COMPLETE @ 2 STARS ‐‐ City sponsors/uses SHIP $ a community gardens program; 2 farmer’s markets (one in Veterans Memorial Park)  27.4   COMPLETE @ 1 STAR ‐‐Farmers Market Certified Minnesota Grown   28. Business Synergies       action 2, 3 or 4  NO   29. Climate Adaptation       action 1  NO 29.1       NO