The URL can be used to link to this page

06-27-77 agenda~- ., CITY .OF RICHF?ELD, MINNESOTA • Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 209 \ ~ Agenda June 27, 1977 ~~ The Honorable Mayor and Members ~.of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: • Subject: Approval of Bid for City Project 705, .First Stage L/H/N Public Improvements On Tuesday, June 21 , 1977, bids for the first stage of the L/H/N project (City Project 705) were received by Hennepin County. The agreement between the city and county provides for the county to receive bids and award contracts after approval of the award of such contracts by the city council. Two bids were received with the iow bid submitted by Schafer Contracting Company, Inc. in a base amount of $1,175, 556.25. The next lowest bidder was Hardrives, Inc. ($1,298,809.54). The county engineers estimate is $1,194,954.89, according to the cost sharing agreement between the city and county. A copy of the bids " is attached. The county base_bid amount is shared as follows: Bidders County Share City Share Total Shaer Construction $225,165.72 $ 950, 390.53 $1,175.556.25 Hardrives _271,618.85 1,027,090.69 1,298,709.54 The construction schedule is as follows: This bid 1977 - All roadway work on Nicollet Avenue from 64th Street to a point just north of 67th Street - All roadway work First Avenue from 65th Street to 66th Street - All roadway work 66th Street from First Avenue to Lyndale Avenue 1978 - Ail roadway work, utility and pedestrian improvements on 65th Street from First Avenue to Rae Drive - All pedestrian improvements to Nicollet Avenue - All pedestrian improvements on 66th Street = All screening improvements on First Avenue All roadway and pedestrian improvements on 66th Street .from Lynda.le Avenue to Graham Avenue ' Council Letter No. 209 -2- June 27, 1977 Additional Bid in 1978 1978 - All roadway and pedestrian improvements on 66th Street from Lyndale Avenue to I35W . - All roadway and pedestrian improvements on Lyndale Avenue from 64th Street to Lakeshore Drive. Although the staff is recommending that the contract be awarded on- the base bid, six alternatives were bid. In most cases, the alternatives were bid to keep the specified items of the base bid more competitive. The alternatives which were bid include: 1'. Alternative pedestrian benches are more expensive than the base bid benches. 2. Alternative bollards and bike racks which were slightly less expensive. than base bid bollards and bike rack. Even though less expensive, the alternate bid is less durable and requires more maintenance. 3. The base bid for the pavers is less expensive than the alternate pavers . 4. and 5. These are tree size. alternatives.. Remembering that the theme of the shopping center is established by the unique landscaping, it is the opinion of the staff that the larger trees should be planted as long as the budget is maintained. Thus, the base bid of five-inch caliber tree or the 4.0 inch caliber trees . 6. Alternative six is the extra large pedestrian way in front of Holy Angels Academy. The alternative provides fora 12-foot wide ped- estrian way, a retaining wall on Holy Angels property and additional landscaping to blend-the wall with the Holy Angels property. Total cost above the base bid amount of this alternative would be $40, 810.60. Holy Angels has .not favored construction of this larger pedestrian w~ y on 66th Street: because it would be necessary to obtain land from Holy Angels to construct the alternative. By comparison, the base bid provides fora 10-foot walk and 8- foot walk along 66th Street. Where there is an 8-foot walk provided, 4-foot land- scaped area is provided between the curb and walk. Where the 10-foot walk is provided,. the walk extends to the curb. Recommendation The staff recommends that the city council approve the base bid as submitted by Shafer Contracting Company, Inc. by adopting the attached resolution. . Respectfully s~ubmi , Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager Public Works Director 77~ ..... .,. 2 ...... C 7l -. J .... 1 ...~ ~_ . __ ._ r . RESOLUTION NO. -RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND APPROVING CONTRACT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND SHAFTER CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. FOR LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET IMPROVEMENTS -CITY PROJECT NO. 705 BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1.. That it is hereby determined that the bid of Shafer Contracting, Company, Inc, , is the lowest bid by a responsible bidder for the construction of City.Project No. 705, Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet public improvements . 2. That the bid of Shafer Contracting Company, Inc. , for the construction of the above referenced project on a unit price basis, at the prices contained in their proposal of June 21, 1977 with an estimated construction cost of $1,175, 556.25 is hereby approved for award by Hennepin County as provided in the agreement between the County and the City of Richfield. 3. This approval is for award of the contract on the basis of construction to be performed inaccordance with the base bid. 4. That payments to be made under the terms of said contract shall be charged against the Construction Fund for City Project No. 705. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 27th day of June, 1977. Loren L. ?maw Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk r~ ' n~ r,J nl .. ~ ...-.... ~ .-..~ ,...... 1 .. fJ.~C'lC'JU:!-J:~trn;,r..fr,J._.I`_iL9f_q^J6trnl;WtU«~ ~J 1 M 'ri Gt "TI tii t i `rt tt C-t `rf Ct t 1 i'J ~J C':1 bt .::a Ul ,'] r't .`- r! r t ! a i ry rll ::) ~y ~~ ^,i !rJ '.*7 Gl I:-1 . i ^~ ~>7 i q ! ~ .. !-J rll ~7 - 1 ~ !sf C:~ r1 -', . !.~ . j ,`) ~c~ ~ r, r t I"~ ~-ry t j_ , (.*; C7 t 1 l,j ... r l I !a ~ ._I 7, [`, :-j r :L 'rJ C19 . r=) ' J u ~ - . [ ~ - 17 .-{ r 11 ~ 1 i~ - > I ~..... t ' r t , ~ - l ! r7 bi -' - -.. _: C:: ~ :~ "1 ''i - . ,. .-. ra .'t I'l ra -: _l _ .' _: 'r_) __j { I -J r _I rJ t. ; j i t .r _~i Ti 7', =: •. - -.- •:- -. r.i ~+J.rt ,-• r --r ~> •r -l - Fi !?J rij rs) 'rJ !: "~r_ r~ MCA r=J rt1 ~' • %d f ;J f J 3i C) -i G~t tr1 M - _:. G-t v I :') ;~'i r.~i~r'1 Yrj hl ht ._. ,-. .. --- • •- - - Zt .~{ Crt :T.i ! ;I .(_, r_j '--[ '. r ' r.t ~[ . j SrJ c~ r~ . ~.~ t r.,f . r. _ r.' h f rrl ~ ' ] ~ 1 '--i ' i '-+ _ r] r j ~ hl ~ a - _, i - c rri c: r.l ~'t !~1 h l r.J j.l -, -. ,-~ ~ n 'a [~ Si ~ t '_1 ,~ ' ,-j _ rti =~ rrt c1 c.n ' " , n : CO a 'J w tl j ~ ^`. ,-..~ i _ .rt ~~ ~~.i to t,' ,- I ~ f it C-' . ` . - • . , hi - rf trj J ,J t7 f 1 ^: ~.{ hJ ,-~ l .-j Q C i t • ~ ['t .1 ; r_1 .:] .-i H _ i ._~ .-. ,-1 'c) I. f ••:S ~- Ci 1 . . fit +-' . ' ' ' .~ ! j (l .-, -.J , . _ S+ _.1 (, r,) M r, 1 ~I . _~ r11 a] + t _lJ . I J J_: i. 1 L7 li) _[ :.) Ir hi ['i r M -:. -~ i ' C ry - . :T ^J Ul ~ ~' :i: -d C.n ._ ~( -- ::: ; -` t-` ',J '--.- t Ij _ _7_ [1 S .S [ ~1 tT1 M ~ :Li ..1 t=' '.:! n; -i i [ Ij = i ~ M . ,, rtt '-j "'J rJ ...- - h1 rcl . ' ~ ..~ -.., hf -'_ I~ M _~' ~rJ " ~ ,--1 _' ~ ' U7 r t .- ~ t C ~-! Cn rt rJ trt (,~ `-') '-j Ul ~1 1? I'~1 -> [-I I .-. ,_.. _ C'l r i ~ Cil y 1 -: ' r r ' St r l `r7 o Crl 'TI r' ,'] r+] C.n t! .,y ~.j ~., j J ,.-t • rJ .-f dry -- 'i7 .~ ' t~ Ui C- tT{ `r] '-j 41 M t-' tti 'J O ;- ri ~ r r;i ~ t `rJ ri ~ t % ::U ~ 1_ C ~ ~ h3 :~ i1 j hi M `-~ [~ U7 M L r• f hi ~ r » ci r rn zt ..3 ~~ "j r~ C J1 U7 r S '" ~ ~ ~ ~r t7 7 7> {J c trJ .~ :!•t ~ M ~ rri r cl] [F j ~ _' L ~ ._-1 r:~ ,y Z ~ Uj rn a . ~ nt nJ r,~ n GJ C•1 C,t .- . ti. Ct S3 X ' ~> ] ~ 1: !:a ~, YJ CO ] [~, C.a rµ7 -•t C.J rat r ~.j ,~ r`J `.'' ~ nt iy~ •-• C•i Ln C..1 rT) i.J rµ'1 .-3 r.J IjJ - - - .. U] f7 .J i~ PJ ,_? .~ ..- ; ~ r,J .- r) : I-. ( r n ! . r r, .. Ca -.J ~ _J i ~; Cr ~-- •~ i f• rQ C..j ftl (~i r._-. I ._ !±i ,~ ,_' [ , rT) i l i r,j I_ i - H .-. ~ y` . ~ ~ ~1 f- r', i~ - I -- r';! 1~' I': ~'! 1_ r 1 _,: f ('1 r_l I_l 1 rl 1._.1 1~ .-j r-' (~ t~ /,"'1 C t fTj _ . • _ :rJ f: Ua: i.;' '3~ ,_: 131 :_, U ~_' Cr C -C] lc L7 I ~-r; r, I~.i ~'I Imo- '_~ t.., f~' ~.] r,7 T> ~ M _. r_r ~..-. , , r r '. r 'ter '': _ .., ..~ .-f r-' L'i ' - <) t , fsf t-i tr ~y i ~t t'7 Ci s r' Y"` •-j .-? t+~ t-a _ ~ H f t! Gl C... iJ7 7J ~'s , hJ .y _ , r- ' i-) 1_ t . _[i T :.` :1_t I.. i r_) .-+ _ .-i ,_) ~ iJ ! f.. CI 1 U] '-J '-1 _ G t - _ _ _ ` Cs is t_ r~i !~ ~ *-j y ~ ~ tii :? ,- a n ~'' tai L) r i nJ S i _ ~) F., ~ ~ t,J .~ t H r r n ; ' i r n ` r. • r v f,J C17 . - ! I_ - i.: _ :_.j (,J r>J r i ' _ ~ - ( ` ti~ h1 `,j .-..-~ tTf ~ .. i 4-, .3 ! yl I;i .I . I I}] .n rl j_ I [' i- 1_.J ~ - _ _ .,t ~ .I _, _: -] ' ~ j Q _' - , •_:: i n, ITI I;;l IT: I-; ~ n -; i'~:i 13 -;1 1=' ! ~ r"_i --• ~i ,3, *-1 :--f I'-1 131 r r hl rit ~C t:) L'•l_ t~ f~ : i_yl I_n: ~: `.i f:' I_--_: :-1 1_, Imo-! :_: _~] :_:1 ;'i ;_i :,-. I _I i_n ,_t I_ I I ji :11 I `~l Imo: .-j hi ~ ` •J ~ ~j ;Ij ~. J J .-, lil .-. it .~ ~; u r r ° -', 'C1 .>l ~f.Ji_ni.l,,:rji.J._.f.J ,(; •-.,~C.;rrJ,--in r('.J' `it I F .:T; i1 n r - ' l l -' ` ' ' ltCi j .-~ hf - H .t , I _.l ~ (, , I_I t? ~ ) : '.. f_:. 1_I:i r_ it ~ ij I_rt i J- ~ 1` r ') 1 t ~i l I I r r' r 1"-I i` r -. ,: I ~ ~"~ i'- -• r - _ ' ~ ~,) C H N 'T~ , 1-'' I _~1 (~ 1 _, 1 1 ,_, ~ ~ , 1.-, I_ t , ~ 1, I r~. t ~ I r_n 1 - - • ~ -I i ~ ! iJ i- -'I r n I"'~ I ~l i ~? " 13 -, i_'1 i= ' - : Iil , : l 1_7 i - T .-] .-• ~ ~ I`ry :41 _-; 1=~ i';1 _ 1 I_ : 1=i I_ : 1~-1 ;=7 ~ .-1 1_u+ Iii r, r~ 7 f-=1 <_, ,'-; : r _ tl i I] Tf ^t - - ffl i a r q 1~' f,l ['. ..-~ I".;t ~,l C"_! i i! .~ <~1 - . M ~ I ~] r t. i':' r r:._r~ r r, v~:; I 1 r_i i..! _, i _. r^ ,31 1^'1 is i ,31 r>.t r3, ~-1 r_., ~-, +?j r: t .~ l°1l-t)f~'~~. i]L7! _. _t.., lt_1 t-,L?Lr1 '11.~"~C: y-+l- , 1 ! t`~ J? ~ ~~ t M'd :~J bi ~ ) ^..t '. it. ~~1 -:t "1(.'.f1J^t +,--•rr. ~ .~.t .-. .. :..J i~t ~~ _' ;,t ~ ^li:=i.?I',I -,)t 11 I ~i Ut,_!i; .l r'i 1_l ?~i 1`i V~ i _; iLt u7 _ ~ ?C~'Ir;..~iii^,r,ll::1~_Jr..3, -,~I~I:: :r-]is1r ! :;Ci r - : r...).) _ M . , .. _ . _ __ _ . L ca -1 .. ! .- :I ~ r, c;. I.:. ,- '; r_-, ;, ,- .,1 I r,J ~ in .-1. , c, _~ -' ~~+ _~ 7' r7 CJ D M J . , 1.-1 :_ 1_rl C rl C. :};. -:: r: ~'~I . r ~ j qj • I_ i i_n _-': C,1 n i .~ I ~ i ~ ~I I :=:~ r :1 t ~ I _r, t. i r, t r1' '~ r n :: C '~.I I_ '"~y ~ 3 r--• H . ~~ i i•-f'-.f'_'~+1'- ~IIrl•li - •°1 f. il•'Ily -i1';I ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ 1 ~ [,1 f h7 ~I U -;1 I. ~a i f' ~ _l i_, i_ i J ~~~ I l~:l _I i QI V-, : ~ 1_ft 1 n ~_~t 1=.~ l ) ,~ Ul ' n; ,, yJ 1--1 ~ t7 n.1 ,"') O -t,i... -r.J C.J •-. ,~ .. C rp~, - '~-,._:,tti - ^.l f"~i..-7~ •nl ~J l~ ~ - Tnr~ _ _ t~•1c,1 .i_nJ.. -t~ t1 .r,ln' -t- t', ~~„ ai'df,~~ " ,_ ~^ ~ - ~ _7. - - , r.t ~-- :q f.- r;, .! - , ; 1 --t , [t - ,l ,.i' - -j i ;I ~ ' rU i _ - _ a (, i .. ? .. :.1 ' ~' C . -' ~ -1 :i 1 J . _ i C l . J I 'J J l` . l .. _" - : ; : . . ' . I-,,:..,,-Il.nl- ,.nr,rjl-,,-;._il_,r:J~-;,r~ryh;lr•~r~ .-j :y _J-J-d-.1-.,1-."(....I-Ii'rvtrfl'Xlff1._ir;)rrir^itrlr:lCAi.ni_nLnin[.nc.ninc.nlila,l'•I',.'tiJ. f...G,1'~.':.C.1i.1C.(i.Jt.Jt.Ji.Jf~1i.IC•If'Jf'1R)fdrUf,J -q C'~, Cn j. f.l f.) ... iJ r'l r!) - j r.) I_n (~ +:'i CJ .~ :_) ::~ 11) -•1 r_7 CA j. r.,.l frJ ~• C;1 i,4 CO •.I t~s C .(, r,l f"J ,-- la ri [I) -"J i;il t B {. i.J (,) «.. i7 i9 :_~) ^,I GI !_n j . `'_. k!) i~ r= r r- r- r` - : ('J r-' ;--' t" i 0 S'i r. l ! 1 rl r-j r-t Cl «q `r ..1 •t1 ' 1 ' i _. r , by 'ri ~.'i .--) Cl ll 'rt .I- 1., .- .. j._ ,~ •rl 't1 "d `r1 'tt "*1 `Tt hi `t1 r_,J ',f r:y t rl - -- ~ =' - = - _ (-) .-) '-1 i=) ''-a i-1 ' . ' : - - - ... 11 ~ 7 - -r, h ; t • 1 ~-, t:7 'ti C-J j. j: i C f .J i.. Ty «-. L~ ~- i'•~ i . -:1 ill , y :: •: 1 . i - «..a i - _~ t- - - ~ .. I G) ~ 1 ! -- - 'J , - C - :' t" ' '-.a `.i i C'i i) ..-, :: = ~_ i i (I; ::.~ r.; r%; r..:. ~:, V ra r;. ~: r; .-{ .-( ~' 7) : r .) :: , :: ) l h i .. t I ! I M l rl t+i t't l' 1 ~[. J- J: '-) :--~ !- i ) . .-.( ri f _ ...{ .. t r ' ;--~ r ij Cii : ^ [ - ;- I n ! r '., `y i n ~". ' i) ry `4 •,! .-. at ~.y ~_, ~zy !at ..y ~!, ' ) ' • { j -.j :: •..1 '-tj • ~ ... (-I .-'t C r) SI ~ - - _ . , .-{ .-~~ ! ~1 i ij +- ' j (') i„ a «..a ..-..-. .-. «. .~ « ~ :i h1 *-+ (,Gl ~i';l. -;Gjisi;-- _ -_)[-1l-Jt•1:•)rii1~-) ~ -,I .•.at ^fitrr _{,._{]; T: _n :)' .1; 'rl~ tr1 !:,J :~i ;rt ti i ?I " J :,t +: i i{j ' - «-I '-1 ' 1 i - i- ..n t:n __ -- r' is .-! '-i i', r-'t ' ~. -. ''d .N _ M M '--( ).y t?1 t- ry «A C'1 >-1 . ~i ? r_, '-+ ~.-) '.J ;J t.1 f ~ y .-: i:') [:', ~) ky (ri ~ r1 r'1 t:j :?i i-) -r rt 7 '.'~ t-'1 trJ 'Tt '+. ` , 1-; ti ~- !'s ... r'1 :~' .... 1 h1 - , • r) ,~' ,-(; r ~ t:1 -I Cl i ~.t :.] r,y r ~ C _ t q . n ~ , t .,y r. Tt i ': t: -l '-(. ai f ` 'a; `1 y ''7 hJ •-j . j "- ~, "_ (• - ~ r~ i ,} ,-) _ `:J .-{ i t ("1 j t-. ]-, •; - -- - '_ - (-' -- f i - '-' i.i r1 r-, iy i -a -, : :! •SJ :tl TJ C,1 [-l r r-i r i -~ t" :=J i'f r -; t+l t') r"i ,'~ 'ty ht f;l ( ! r.:.; __' r.-j ..a (rJ ;° r:) j rj r - __ ry k~ - _ - _. h . .. .. _ ' ' C•1 i q ~-{ r-I ). J. •-! •- ' ~ ',i '_:i Cd . 1 .L i :Lr - I i :l t'1 `.'1 :ri ; J '•! C. i `7 5J I! : iJ : 7 <J t.J ': - - ~ t? J ' `' : J ?'1 [r! t*1 i,-) 01 :il :7? C 1 :C+ C Il i 0 I TJ I rl «-{ ni C ' h i `i 'd ` " ry S [ '. i" •-• ! 0 SrJ ["" rrt 1 r l M M ' 1 M r!1 t rl r-} ..; . -J ~~ _ :.--. r-ry r h f ,l ::rl r r r-i `,, t> _; CJ ,~ hJ Ul 2; t -1 l , l -; r ' '` i S? S.J k:'! .h t7 rJ •.-{ ' ~ h1 i0 to i ,l C O ~ r l j? :^ _ .-. _i ry ,..~ ~,', C' ii1 ~ i :~ ; , ! . ~ a h_ .-i C' i `:' - •-• t'i i-i tTt = ~ ~ N _; i M 'ri t~ h1 i,J,~r..1r..1!slr.Ji_.IrJil- ` - S')r~)ttlc't't"+J -- )r- )ir;;iti! 77'r.l :r') :")~Git-~~i: :rj~ri :; il'-iCrl r~l - f-) ..-) t-s = _'. iij ,_,) ]:, ~ _ ..i t-• +,7 },1 . - :j: .. r. i --- , ;r~ --- ~:t ::+3 '- -*', ~,i T'1 - ~ + • Lr1 M tT( "'- *.ri r,J . .-. ~ !1 :'-) !-) ;-s r) r i r,-i i-i :_ •-J ^j '-1 'y t+i t •_• •-' - . _i ..a :-.: ..,y '- ~t7 :C_ + ^ .~• trl -- T~ i ~ 'cy -v = F i 1 ':J n ~.'.) _ i C .i r, .-, --, ' - = _ -' - r,i i i f [TJ !rJ L i ~) •_ - -- -- ---_ - tj.;J';j•- ..rj,_-:Z-' - , _-_ ~ ':j :_ i !ay C'7 C"' C' 1 Ul C'1 ~ ~ tTj '+7 {) [.1 :-.:G •-~ tr1il):-.. r7tiJ -s .`d t-+~(j,..J T! - [-• ,..{~~ •,i M t-'fir-jC«~ kyF, ; _;.y. ~Ir-,r'1thMh1 .)L~JGI LIii1 l:, _,1(= Cl -T 1`[!lt"IryG')_- ~ _I) C1T!•Tjl._ r-_ i - r- ~ = C C C +~ --1 -' :. ~ I rh rJ ri t_;1 by t" «-' :Li ~) L'7 '~ 1 tr(_ «.j ~ !7 -; ,-+'tr1 ;•] r.' ~ =) r) (; (t : 1 :.') •: 1 r) trl -y t'j V] ! ~) r~) f•) ~ i~) C:7 hl {-' Ul '~, M M td (") M '--1 •..l `-1 ~i ~j '-1 •_) ,-j Ct7 r_il .- - C7 - .-. rat !:i Z, J - : J :; i] :.') '._) i=) i-; =.7 '::J tJ '-1 I I UJ f'0 T) U i ~ ~ ';) ~;l ! q •-' •-1 ' i O .:, ^.j ! .y ' y tt S+y , :? . J f'J ~~ r_,1 J.. _^ I i i i A ~` 'q hl .i) 't1 O C) r.) L) O'O C) J C~ +-- hi _T_ .l;t ~ ~) ~~ [.i ... r a CJ O • " ,).~ T M ._• .rJ ~ rtl fJ i"') frJ r,J r.a o7 L~ A -A rq ~ ') rtJ •-. frJ ~ «-- r~I ftj 0 -~d j~ - - ~ r''J --• h ,-. f r ~ ~) Q) j~ -• C.:1 ! ~) ,_J js G? r .1 ,~ r t1 «- ! . , .5:: 'L:, r ~) CJ - h ~ ? j] F-. `'~.1 f~j rTt C4 6) +--• I, r n n] .:: i9 ~..( U7 i.•1 Uj ~ n i ..( .a «. ;_ ~ r,; -.) ,~! t n frt [U _~ ~.. Cp rtJ j~ .~ r5) PJ frj =,~ ,_J iq frt lid - ~d ('r) «-. fJ .St i_n ~-• C+I f-r j . r, r n ' ~:, f, j r ..; ,_;: ,) r ; ~~, rn f. j l;, : j ~ 1 '.~, .t- - , C, r n ,_ I t_ !_I - ; r n r_r, t I) j~ +_ j ~ j', t,J j.: C,1 C n :., j , Ci ~ :? ., , ;1 r.J '-- ':yi ~, j i ;: f, j i ;t *0 t~ -,1 r'! f~! ~1 f'nt r~ f~~l (-r f ~] ,Tr t = r~i ! _.! i -! i ? f°,l i-. t-= f : k y f:; ,-..' :`! ~': fl C} i'~.t • ' i tl ice: ~~ ,Ti (.1 ".i f_=. • - r:J ~ 'ii !'l f~"r [ ~ .'t !.j Cl f ~t ~I [l (°;, • R? C.,l •_;, _.,1 a ri f'-? +_. !. 7 1 il i ~ ~ C ,._. t_ l __ (.J __ :_~ I_:: !_ ,-y! f_:: i_! r t f~: :_:I t- !_+ ~: ~J ! _, tom: I~l _t !~i '~. +_. !J '-! '_J _ _. 'mot f_• ,_ ! lJ f_J !-i r,t , ~t !,_, t", !_;t !._. C=J i .! i! i_:d C~+ iJ [rJt't't-'C'!'"tit"`r~IJrlt!7tttil7li.tit-'C•t-"r't"C!itliCi!:-it)riltril:ii't-'r'i~rtl;J.c~r=r"ice[ [;';t'fi~fiTltrit~,r'r!lht..-)L-)i!i.;.~ _IJ .- _ ..L` . - is i ::. - "-, i:? '_ _. t- :i; T! _ ." F--. ,._. r 1 r - i') i' Z 7-+ Z' : !-) C - _: i-_k i-7l i 'r. `I] 't i `n 'TJ ' . y ', y ' *i ~.1 d k_-i «~ `*t y, 'r; «t ( `*t .-3 "--1 .-.t k~ tr: `r( «t-1 `7 'r1 "t 'rt `TI ~,y `ti hf •-J t~? ri ... ._ f, j r 11 f_l t~ ii i ri , ~i ft) tS, ,Tr J•, +, t :.1 _ ('.I ; ._. -i t-=:.-• - .._ {,.t r:i) ,: p i't _.-.] -~~.1 ' ! ^,1 r.J t q ! n i ~ t ,i~) .~ ... t.~+ ,_-t~ k-: =~~1,+~!l f tt Cwt 1~.:_q .-. i_t .-~ Ca «.. f J f il !_:: _ ~"_t i_r i Si' j, tT) rat f•1 J`:.-j"~ j~ f J > . ~ I_tj frr ,_~ ,~ Cr; ;..R i_t] t; t' ._ ~ i.. ._. ! :': f: _! t.. tl i : t _ C, i_ (.`1 _ , .: ~ ~: t~, is !?? :_;: J) iiti i. •'-)f,ii [t •-~.1 i-: i~:,i -: f- •- :,-t•': i:i .~f!7i f' '~'i i'~,,. - ~~~ _~t_~ _ _,i-:• :,~~f`?i i,_l, ,_-,I: i_!r• T..!,'ii-1:~-. tom: ~.'I --'I~t (+i :~ lf!!_J t`, ti.' J L'r t'-d :.J i_f '~ f.: _^ :_,. . ~ .rl t. _, , -: , ^ ,1 ,_j ~ ,_ ,_~ ~ J : ~: t' G ,_) l_r .-- `: - -,: ~ :::_~: r_,r I. ~ L .: L_t r :~ ~ ~ Imo, ,_,::, i :--.i ,-j! ~ ; : t ,mot _t ! l t;;-J C,( r`_; r.: ,~ r, j".. rT; .h: PrJ f 0 - .•1 ftJ ~ j'n C•d fU ,.~ .-. ~ r G ! tl f i+ j .'_~ j:. i r i --} r _:.1 i .1 j = (, 7 ~_r i_l .- (,? f ..I j"a i .) -..] .~ ',.1 i i i .-_ i*,) f=i j~ j; f rl (~ ._, t.] fQ !~ [ q a -+ f ~ r [ i) j . 1 tl i i r ~!r r r, i . +~ ~• j--. _ : _tj r j J-:; r_. j .-. i i : r f f q fj i u i .) ,_ ; (. r .i - ,1 .-. ('!i f •) - ...r` r - -,r a ' i i it (c j f, ? : ' S -~-~1 j. r t l;'_ ! >.1 is I t i .1 1= ' I t - t - yr r -, . j , l . ~i f,_i p i i ! : _r y - - : ii: j r! t i ~ _.J r - ~ _ I.. i ^ r_l C t ~1 r , r ..) ~I . r - 1 . s - I ,_ . i i r :1 1_ _i F . -.1 +;:' .! . ~I (, i I, 1 ,_. I r l :_ - r r _' : L' j-~ ' C. S t t_d :_? (-! t :-~ i (! : i_rl i ~ r_ t_ r_: i.._r ..1 r_r ! :Y. _ ! I. I :. ..._f t_I '- ~- - -; •!_ :.., . • l_ i r`r I-; I_l i:J I. J L. '_':! i ~r : [•_ f"!i -.i rti i i r ::. ~ . - • i._ ~-- (~~ t ; - ~~) I"! r_~ •_rl '_: r-r i .'i : - it fj- . . ~. i',i •ci r--! r-r f{r rYi • ~-r r-rr ! rl Cr :'~l'D ~: ~-i i'-: r ~..i i~a •.~r t..j i~r C'? k ~I :~! I_:i ~.~ '_q [? C:t tTlt r- k.: r.~-: r__ :_: ~ _:.: r .I k_,.. I ,' I i ,i r j C' hr i ' ;_ ' i J i ,-_:r ~r_'r r_:. _ r 'r _' r__ _.: ,"d = ! :.r ~:r :_ } __• r_, C. r~r I_i I_'r r':' :_:r ;_' CJ ' ^t -~i r=l ice' C~ L~ LO r..1 i,.J r.. - --.I!_I« fvrqu.:r:r1:;.: - q~~ `~r,JII_tli.r.... - ;~L+! !;,^,]l -..l f.tl «J «~ _..1 ~. rrj . •1 :_J !.: L' C^ . .;) i_•t j- {`. L;.1 C..] 1.. ,+1 . _rl I__I ;~' .. -, _' r- - t/ ! .. _ .. !_~ tS ~ 1 =? r_; '_ •:'1 r-- ' •1 ''..I i_a ., r -, •' r !~ ~.7 -,.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I:l irl I::1 ... r f, '-tl i ~l -~~.1 C'i (J r~r r_ j r ur r-l r _r r ~) +i ^-. ~. is !Tt ,-. r..1 L-' C ~ CSr ~! C ! r:i! i w r-' _ 1 ._1 r_7 rYl r; r:r f l L,'I i r r:_r ;~i _! !:.t ^'I '?_i i ~:i i '; L=r r_~ r~ r_ r : _i f_'f !Tt r_q i!1 :_~ , ul ... r_:J Ctl r_ ~ f C r i r_ _ _ r ' __ :_, rte: ~-_ rte; r_n r=? •_n I_n ~ r, c.:~ k ~~+ C r~ __ r_ r !..._i :.• c. _ :.r ,_;: i- ~: ~ c: r = •~ l=d ^? i"t r ^.:'": i,=l r_. r_ i f-l r~i f'; C.1 C.{. ~ ~:T -rt-.Ir,i r~t r. -.(f,_ r. "tiC+ -)-^-_i !fi .L ,. tf )f-tr~~.Ctl ., L r'fl~( ,-- 1~+--':. r_: f'7 it:! , _. •~ t ~,1 .~ r r ~ f-. I- t I fl ' -1 I t,~ i '-I i q I r r 7 O. -, •., t t: i 9 9. t: i r_ t I tl r f r i ~. ; -~ i' t -- I-l r t '- 1 ..I_ r: r. t r_. r; (,1 r,j t,.,i Q-' - C`]'~: r!i._ ~.:.!~, .l~~r_-,; r,-•Lrj-. )!.t iV ,... +_O C.Ir•J, 1•:a r_~1:~ Crr- ) ':, f. ft_rr .. !!'.J .'rrC -r-d r t_- .] [ r I; -i:a =7 r~~-.r r~J [a i_tl La ryr ~--li.)i,t.-.C:7"'i.JiJ'_!f:_.'.j..r.ei_il'._•l,r[l !i+-:fr.r--l r:_.:'l-,!Cd ~_J'_J _il _: ... .:. r-'__~--CJ '_JIl _~:~ J ::)r.l r_^. rr_ _r j:', rJ k:>: i i r ra ,,1 '. Il r::.i j, r_J i ,r-.._ :'? '~: i r i_,I ~ 1) i , _.: ~ -.,r • ,1 :';r t i r • tl i ~-t r' Y i ~r i ,, f,~r f-r •'•:r r-r r':r •'.,r •"sr f.:, r 1 i ~~ ! tl '.>r :ter '_ '~? rT_ i •'.r [:r _! ~frl r~i i~t i _r i~:l , t: ` "r r_Il ':.J _.I ! ;: r :._. _ ~! !. . l.: r.. .1 y _ r_ i Jr ~! :_:I f ~ !u! r-,~ ~-J I_l r..,r 1, r l _.. r i -'' ;_! l: ~ . .l r_.. !;r r'.'r ;,I i _;r r~r r_: _.r r_ .-.: r-.~ i~r r_.r :! r_.r C.'1 l:..r j l 1 ( ri i -~1 «. - i p J:..i`. .~ fr 1 ... .. Ct, ,y! ,_r] 'S) C.. C.~ i ..J 1.. -- r , ' . (r! . rl j , .. (_i ,r i_r.l `1 -.) i'1'-ft [_It !~..G ':r ,•:, (,J':.:' ..l -'d S ,_e r.j 1;.; .~ ~.] •-• GI i,! _,r i_,r p I r :) f i i r_ ~ t ri f.l ~ ~, :T) ..~ i_.1 ~ i r r;ll r_'. i i_~ +:.~ r"'' I :_i !-• t r,_i r_ f; r_tl '..~ -~.t r._n (~. t r r1 , = i yr I_rl . l.~ ^~1 ' ] t': f , _St ^-1 i' .' i -1 r, -r •':'t - . - -.: • t ,' •'i •-. • _ r~ , ~ i_fl ' ~ t i ~'t : •tt i- 1 i Tr ';r r i ~ r i`r • r r' -- ~ - ~r i t; r .j .. -,1 i_q -i , - ~r ';r r 1, r_r i ~i ~-,l :^r ~ ~~1 i_q ,'i '-. l;t • ' rJ? i ! r (r 1 r Il 1. _! `- t._7 ._. r- , l J •.' r_'1 :. - k ' } C_i I.:.' '•a !~ i ~ t~' r .} _ r !-..! i -. ".: t.! ~_ . l.: ':: t-'r ~ ! __ '_, !_' C! ` ~ i'Sr r. ::k ~r L.:~. .r _:! r_J C.II ,_.I I •.I I_'1 '_l r~r !i ) t. hi. •rr_i---.1. _lr- -], .il' r _r_'. r r- r;; ,r, ri.1i.1... _ ...tom :.q 1 :i . ' a k'; -1 r . , (~ , . . f .1 ~ ~ , ry 1-. L ? , ~) (~ 1 J,. J V'' :. j •. ..1 (_tl .C. r r ] L I i i J l r i j ~, i ~ r i .1 ' ' i •.] i , t . .) J.. ~ - r_ f 1 (V (' 1 ,'.1 ~ _ . i - , . 1 I, r .~ ) i i r ( t .. , r_ 11 r- 1 (. ~ ! ~+ ~ ,'_ - r I _ ~ ~ - . - 'f , r " 7 r '. 1 . 'll r _' I ' i r r) i r ~ '~ I' r r .I ._;) _..1 ,- - t :..I i .tl ~ - '';,l (I t (, 7 r~,.) ,~ . i .. t ~ -r r . ..1 !7 (rJ L .J (..I i :1 (~.) r-_r[r!.-L!lk..;._IlfLtr~I r-r'1: i-li_.Ir'.rl^J. 71~. it ,1 .. -:I~") -.t. ,iv j. i,C'I'_ .. .'f l 'i_lr•;tr_-:,rl:'C_tr~i+. _ .'CC!'J._.i_'!~ i ~ 1 (, , ^" 1 r . ] r -,r r_)1 . - t , ^ r . .:r r - _,, -,1 ~ i i ' , : (. _.: r - •- - "h r' l •j -• ' ;t r' J ' r (,! r ' i ~ 1 ~ '! : -1 P .r r ;~ . •`7 ' tl ' - -• 1 , I l ..! • r r .7 i-' r ~,. - r.r r.: .. r ~ (" '_t r. ..; lh ! '. .!.. . :. '?'- _.r '. .i( ir_:J r. .'!':'C. .. =rr-?r..'! :~t i_-r .-'t.:!!_. In _. _!(,r fJfU f'JfJf"'1fUfU f'J•-•-+'-• •.••..•,• ~••~ ~.r,~')r,r•r)ref)''7!„r?ryirpl.y-ir;ir;Irgtncq':;}tprnCl)rprl)iI)I'I}iI),,11ri,:i)\ ''J r'1 C'1J:~!•IrtJ"_. rl(tiCO`J rl~n:.. (.(ftJ "--f7i:,lilJ-Ir'1'inj:.C•JfJr1::)t:Jiit-•I.ii{~j..(r111J~..CJrr,?itJ....Jr~tt_n!aC.II•)...r)rti~. `ti'll r.•; t..) (.7 :i i -? -; :J. ~r l ~] tt 1 .--' c ? --) t ' T_I r•1 : •- _, r+ J ~ ~-: "r. r_i t'['] r,i I= ;~ r;] r,y y: x.• trt t7 {_ ro ~'{ r, .- , ~ .-.... -1;; l ` tri I 1 1""1 =' ,.7 c. y r t'i { ~' - tr„ ~_ ~+`~~_ ' t+r1_ rt ~, ..- r. FD i,j j_ ~,_ it ~° > try :._ lD [~ i?] ':'} p !=' O ~r~:.oCn C!l `rl `d "I 1 (I} 't l `r) C'1 "rt C= C: i' Vii.-.....-. r-, .. •.. n.~ "-1 ~ ! '-i t7 h1 trt { 1 r'1 r' rJ C.j 'YJ '>J _ rte., ~ ~ ~ N -.. ~ rr;,. '; Y r.] ... rt ' rt ~ Fi •) j r'{ ~ r ~ j N N rt ~-~i rr rt m tai ro m z O O N v 0 r 1,1 = _ ' ,p r_rl Yrt t3 {,) v = v ifs ,y~ ay ~•? rrt M ai a~ -=i r9 6) f'! 1 r •~ -G '_'~ •- ja nJ r'J ~- -d C:J i.j tri ra 1_i t': r~ rur ra ,^, t'~r LTl r7 r:'i t:1 M IT1 `r1 `rS `Tl Z _T_ ~•~~ '..t i.i r;..i C.1 t t (..1 ,°_i 1-, -r 1~: h1 it (_n i_;1 tT_: i'1i ;" rri f, j =-•1 r'„ i'.i r rt j~~ P:j r_I r.-. -.J :~ 1_ I ) ( _ ..I ,- I_ ~' f =4 f:j I_: IJ:1 1_';•I ,_ I ICI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r ' "~1 ~ ~~ t ti p, i ~ _,I _ _,, 1_t 67 ] t-1 ,-.1 ~ i -., ~t i,i I ' c ":, , rn :,~ 1;1 ~ r - i 1..: Ct _ ~1 I_. :~I . -} is ~ --.! -'3 q, i, i i- (' ,^1 it c.n r1, - 1 n t°t :• i i'? Ca ~' 1 i-• ~ ' t ~'? .. - 4• fU rnr.j I_ ,_ I_l 1?~, _1 t n r_..1 Ln i !.) -.i ~_~. 1...1 f!.l .j I'.i .J i _~? ~+ rl1 r111-1 ~I'~I ~. .. 'IC'• 1 -ir! i I} 'rl `;] ~,1 rri 'ri +:1 "t1 "rl "ti 't~i ~'-1 `rl "q •-y 't1 ~rl •ri "ri 'rl "rl • li til `'J !~ j.....IJ 'rl • r(. , :. 'tl ... • V .1J - ctrl i` i - -• -- r.> -. r~. ,y .c :: r: ro .-. -:, ~.; C; ,ro ro r:• r; t;•> r.+ ; ; i., r : ~r._r••. r; r3 .: - i - - Ti ~ r~ _ r F_ !-y .-, rri .-{ r-1 t- t ~ .... r~ !~i ,! r-) ri ~ j •., :r, -, _;- ,,~ ._., rl ;- - _ _ '-,.{I} ~-, ..~ ~.tJ r_l; ::~ .-, _<: i~ r'1 r r ci r o ['~'it1 11t1 .:1r~1i.L'.:: rt ,, t'I`rlir)-::•T...i r_p~S, , r.` i r:i ` "h Ji '- '_., r-, ,- - :i1 'tt '~ i Il .T '7 ':y r -.! -'': t ili : t tl i I i .-. r 1 i-1 r'l ! :l ^ t-' ['t .Li I._ `1 ~ 'r1 r ' I _ t, ? - `;1 r-f rlj ._ -_I", [rl -- !-rJ T - r } r~ 1 ^i ".{ .. 'T1 .-. t_Q - -+Clli;,: :1'-ifll_-;ttit!'l,:rt~ .t__t -•q-;tt•-+!~t•1~-•t-' ilt[i1:L,~r'1 r-1 u::l hi • :- ~-j .t": C Ii ~_~ 7 . y rlt ~:'' h) h1 .... S, r- r'l •-" ':'1 `t; .-, ~:' "-1 .-.{ ~ :' -7 T c-, .~ ~ -~ `i" r' ~: r-i `~ :.-i ~_ - •:, ! Il ._, "ri r :*' ~, ~ n ry ,~ ". t.i .~ :~ - _, _ - - _I rri . ~. ;~ ...l h1 ':rJ _ _ < 1 ~_? t. , - __! _~ i ~' -1 `7 ' 1 I n - :_ n7 I} •-{ r-j :I: f fj .-] T, ~! j~ 1:, 7i r~ ~ i. i r-{ T -~ a b !-! `-' ~:L: trl '~- _J", ^ ~ r. pil ..~ _rt ~r9 r"-? Ly .: =r _ _ . ,_ rti ~. M r,'t '; r) . -^; {ry . _? [,1 rn .,'J )_i .. j ;0 t-r1 ~ J t] r-' :7 `h C7 •-(Tc)i=j-% r_C7 rn _ _:::r_7t~h'1M"?' ~i"t-'- .tt71~ Cri ~t (? ? t~ t .. '? .-.{ , CR r-1 ttt 7'` t-' t ~1 =_ Erj ~r .rJ tr1 r_? r_) ~ ? `= r~ t .-. -. $r: r ? ..a ~) . ~ i_r1 '-' i_r} f l} 1, ~'? r) LI ' ra cc rh;_ r: z, sr•.1 cnr_n~J - srJ s'7 rJ r cll r_, n-1 _,r-._ i~.i = : •:~ 1_n'u7 ~s~ ;y M CA Cq -' *-i :CI f,) ! _t r ? ! I} ~" .-j ~ j t rl rli Lr FTJ M ~~ - M r-y rq h~ r) rrl tTl r' :D ~' ~ rj 1 ~ ~ Ct1 M ~ ~ v 07 ['' Ch o ~ L~~~~aa H ~{ - •JJ ' r . r>, r' j rl~ r; p .. r-- ~-. ~ ro ;„ -a r'J i:o r'J ~ ? .e; of {,1 C..1 r.~ ,~ ~- "-. ,~ "-. r ? ~- .[~ rrJ "nr n7 ro ftj '^~.j•-'..1CIjC,tr'r)ftlLlt!,ti?irJ.C'.f,trni=!,af_nfn~fR'.i1'_il:ijf`•.ii-iR}.-.~.-,.~~.iyt:{~Sn Cl'r r_, r^s h, f i f'=1 i ; f" J I`s '._I C•l i- _I `l f',! i -_ • ~ ['l ~i ri f}l t^ l y I"-l i 7 !'J •-,l I~ rri r j rn r-. (-, I'I CJ :I l-.1 _ r lu! !_. 1, _d :_! .: 1~1 t..J L L . i. !: _! '1 1~' I~ ! ~ !1 Gd ~ 1_J r? lyl Ins Is !'l t_ ~I L 1~ l~7 fJ?C11,^_,C!irt}r17`;irl}CilCli_Ci!~j.~.~._ ,j•-{•-:j,~~i,~,.ytt'1"':.~Ci'r(1UlFr1t~7C_il[:ld ':-) `(v 4± ' ' ?-i tr?. r!1 t+ i [`t t ~ cr- tr; tt S RT ~l fr1 r17 . ?3 ~! / ~ i ~ ? 4~) C'> ;) ~J .r £l -r -~-_'_^Cr1-:r::rr~r'1h?Mt:Trrlt-iMMMh7triZ~+?_'.-{ =LS'~~2 t~C!rJtyr-:JpJrJr•JryC;,y MUiCii "-'1 ~'lfrl i~..-~ ai ~ Crd !; _ .:, .n Crl f1jC•%-• t'.)fr1i11r_ir.jr ?i,µjrl_j!?i_ IR~-c.-sr-,iRl~'i.~i~'':i';i1-,1:_ii I", ,~ .. r _t V ! ! .. ! :l ._I I ._! !~ _• 1_J i_;I I f~' -. I ~-' L`l. ! '.1 :_I I ~! :_ - t. _ -~ ~ 1 I_ ~1 1_'. f ~;l 1' :.n i_l i ti i ^ 1:_ ~ ~ l IT- ~-t - , i ~~a i is sTS - i~'. I'.} 1-• 1_, s-1 1 =;i 1~1 1_: - - : t-: i `~:: 1- - ~r ~ ~i 2.1 i-JI f:n _~ 1 .. 1~1 _~ I 11_i r_ 11.1 _. 1' _J I~ r~l I_ 1_, :_~I 1 _ I_. I_sl i 1.' _a _ -, ~ _, 1": `: t_:I 1_I i]y, (n ftJ ~ i_..I j> (..1-C..S ~~., c r{ ,~? Cfl i .J rtl .... ~.. t 9 .-.• r-- 4 ' r_. Ln, ~ ~? :'_:, I^r? J~ ~ i Cr t R ,j] - rS1 ..I __. r, rl'--_...1 ,_?f'7 i' -~J f'C (. fl:!il fil:-_ .., I,:I ;: fti rl i•e.-, ft: f_nfit.- ,i iti flJ f'J r-. ~i I.LLr^'11.11rn!..]j,!.-1-.iS..'-.J ft71:_I {`.1-II"i'::1i!1i ~i r~1l~;?_. I~~i:?i:i l'-rlt l_p 1-1 i~.r i-l. :f=:i 1:-~j . ja +; 1. 1 r`~. LT' f-c' '.] (ri (-) ' '_ r I ~: I_-. :_ :: _I - o .! l .' I_ i 1_J {_ I_ i_ ._l Ijl :' 1 i_' i~ I_ !.' i~.l I_ i 1-1! 111: •111-~ i_fl !~1 f'-j •%I I- I' •-: f~li l''-:1:-1 I'l "~I'r1•11._1 (=';-_"I _?',I MITI '•-11-_'i- yl l'i L--1 1_:! _a t!.,7 ! I_n ITL 1 I:a t_.d 1_:. f-~' I_ I~1 1~' ._~. _. '_I I.<1 1_1 f_I 1y Ir ~`l 1_7 1 11_I Iii I_I I' ,I :~I .'~I I~ 1 13 11 isl C1'1 n 1 n ,fit ;7 I` .mil 1~1 rj _i'_. 1_; I ,I L:i ~. cn C7 I_ ;i r:I '::: _ ~j Ili '1 l -. °i I'i ': 1_ '1 rein rt t ..~) f1 .. j.'i '^) rte' (`~ '-' j~ r~l I'~.r ~ f,:l (r.l ~J ': - - ftJ ~ `. C3 {,, ; ,.) 1~ '7 r, Ian t_Ji ~.. r'. i r_n .-..~(LLIf^n~rr1^.1~'!r~fJr .A i~~I_.rtn._!n,~_I..!::._ _. cl. ~ ~ :._ !_rlflj'~ ftJ r-+ r-i f rl .' ' : I'1 r~l •','t '•l f"I 1' • - I ~:I I =1 I~1 I-,:, ~! I_l 1 ~' I~l ~,I ~-1 I ~! '1 -11'l I J : ! I rl r_,l ''=~1 r_n r n I_ ly: 1.1 ...I I, .1 _.'• I 1~1 1' _ '_ U' _+' 1_' I_ i C'l ! _I •a '_l, la _.. '~' 1.-lr I:a I_J 1_. ::! I. f i i t .I H -.J [~ r n •.n r,J .-. 1~. Crl .... r-- !'~ - r"? ~ ~=? ~ -.1 rj J~ f,j -.1 ~.: f~i {•] t0 _ r.1 p Cif ~. i J f, t r_h r.; I_tl '~? Ja rU r,t i_'I 1,! ,' j-~ 1:u .. Cit ', r1j .- r., r-i I t ...-, Ci!'~a r n ' '11~ 1- 'a r:Ji '11 .I?;~~rt,+ 1n1:-? !.r>_i t:. f•t '.1 :Tti~,- - -t. a_, r'.I •ir^i.)r.l ! ,R 'L t :_ I_ _ , I.: I_ I _ ~'i ' .1 i • ] i. i .,': 1 L. r r i _. .. .1 :.' ! q :. ,' 1:.r C; '- ! .: ~ I_ ,_. - `~} t_,I %~~ • -' 1 •._ -rri GI I 1 1 -? j -:. I-.I _ . .' I'-I FI •- ~ • j l - '• i •,I I-~ `:I I'i •:1 1:.+ .1 ~I I t l iJi lR 1_. ~-:r'"'1 L.: ~_ :'-I_l _. t_.J _- ! .. -,' !:' .. _., fJ '_. ._. L'-:i,i_d ~ J I. d I_;1 ICI :`r 1-i f:~ ~ r:.I i ~I 11 ~~?!11 flJrtj'.'i~ii-_i . - -, .f1 ~j'1 ft1,- ...I - I' __ ~~7 _nf. - -:I •- _ rte. (tl ^.].-r,. ~C2r_,lrt_I...1.7i':.- ? .lrlff-,!rli~)J.-. h) .. !ni': ..,I_1•'i'I':i-_ _'J~ii:fa -~.)iJi _' •-'f ti ,'l i'•r_.i f''..flf_1. '~I i-•-'I '.I 1_rl i~_•'r r',li I -:i-: I'.}i it i"lr ii ';t 1_If-:} !11 l-. _. I?} l•l ! 'i 1_ 1 I- l ~_I '=, t}1 _ I :.. '_.' 1.1' ! i tl __ L.;I I_! _J _,I I'-1_:I I_..I ' I_d [.1 I_.1 r_-: .a! l.J I:,' 1_~ r-. n) _ _ ! :? -- „ram ,'1 t rl _~,If:,.I'; _- .-. r'i -.-`!~U-_1!R-~]Ci.i,, f,?r.Ir-11~rr~i~i~j~C:1 .~.1• :i.)~ ~JfV, j, ';?• ,t11J1. 'a'il ~1'.r': ~~:'i~ iit,_ ln('t~ --).' _ I•~.It,r,.l ~•1-)'.•1! -J .r.i!j: '?!lil':'1~ •li:l, .1 11' -,r_ -:1 t,1 Ir;ll -I_R'd-•J ..1 .t_. l• l . _ : I I ! . I I 1 '... .? i -: ' I .1 ' -) •.. . ! C! I .11', _.I I. ~ L! i ... .. ' r 1 1 f ! • i 71 r, S ~ t ,_ ri r• t !. J • 1 ' t ._ . • i r ,^ 1 1' ~ 1 '.n •: ,':t 1" I f ; t l i •-1 : =1 _`~ 1,-;? r;l i : -;l i l 1`~'.l 1 _t '.!I :. .~'I./I 1. 11_.1 I~.. ",. ._. ~ I[~1 rlf 11_:!1'I .. ?'..."~ '?':: '.. ?'=~'r~? ~ :'.I 1-.I C~J L~J CSI C,J C~I f ~ C~ 'T1 ',1 '~i C,l `rf tit c c: ~-1 y ~ i r r-i ~ ~; j ~~y ( ~71iM ( .~~_j .-j ?? ':I --' c. N rn Ct r,t ~'_ ~h Ct' .C . r j C,i ~ d ~; n _ ~ =C t,1 ~' p t N 'y ~-f A~ -' M rf ~) t7J ~r r~ ~ ~ ea ~ '~'. [l ` z~? = z~_7 o ~- J s? o cn ~ rr, C.J r ~! ~J~~r' ~ ~; u, r- v c ~ M P~ ~•~ td ' M GI C.7 .--. n - r7 1 T c :,, .,y ~~ :~ ai rs =c-:: rlrrt Mh7G C.J ~..) Lvun C-: r.3 I=1 ,_I I_sl hi ¢~ rr„o;l~l n,l.nh C+J fJ . ~Nt:-i -,)r~~ f 0 .-. ,_ ~.. r_l r,.• C.1 r..] ! ~ ~a l°_~ Imo, I .' h..I C51 1_. n1 I~;I~.r~~i rrl,_~ ~:~, ly Ci ,_;, Cal Cfl Lq h (^ Ci} i_,1 Gn b1 inr~C~JtO -707 r.~ ~-, i ^ r~, r_~ r.. CJl CJ ~-~ Iii C, ,-,~ ~_~~ ,-.) /c~" ~. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No.207 Agenda ]'une 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Application for L . E .A . A . Funds for Experimental Meter Reading% Public Safety Monitoring Program Mikro Tel, Irrc. has approached the City of Richfield to request our participation in an experimental meter reading,lpublic safety monitoring program. Attached is a letter' explaining their proposal. Basically, they are proposing to install 200 "mini-computer" type units in selected structures within the city. These units would be hooked by telephone. to the water plant and to police and fire facilities . The main unit to read and receive communications from these units would be a computer terminal. The City of Richfield has been selected as an experimental site, -along with the Cities of Fairmont and Mankato. Implementation of this program is contingent upon receipt of a federal Law Enforcement Assistance Administration grant to finance .purchase of the computer and related hardware.. Mikro-Tel will install and maintain the 200 mini-units . The cost to tree city would be approximately $9, 000 in matching funds. This match can be money, or services, and it appears that the city's acquisition of a new data processing system would qualify as our portion of tyre rr~atr_h requirement. It is my recommendation that the city council adopt the attached resolution, authorizing participation in this grant application which also authorizes the City of Mankato to prepare and submit the grant application to the L.E.A.A, on our behalf. Respectfully submitted, ~'~' // ~~ f U~~~ Wayne S . Burggraaff City Manager W S;3/j k 1 cc Acting Public Works Director Public Safety Director RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION GRANT WHEREAS, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration has been 'authorized and funded by the federal government, and WHEREAS, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration provides grants to local governments in support of projects strengthening local law enforcement efforts, and WHEREAS, a proposal has been developed for the Cities of Richfield, Fairmont, and Mankato to participate in a demonstration program providing for direct alarm linkages between residences and police facilities , and WHEREAS, this program requires certain equipment for its irnplemen- ta ti on . ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: 1 . That the city council hereby supports and authorizes an application for a federal grant to acquire the necessary equipment to implement this demonstration project; 2.. That the City of Richfield authorizes the City of Mankato to submit said application on its behalf. Done by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of June, 1977. Loren L . Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas j. Moran City Clerk ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Inter-Office P/lemerandum DATE June 21, 1977 T0. Wayne S. Burggraaff FROM JOyce L. Wl SUBJECT Meter Reading Experimental Program Over the.-past several months, Ken Conway has been talking to representatives of Mikro-Tel, regarding an experimental program which that company has proposed. As I understand it, the program involves the placing of 200 mini-computer: in selected residences, for an undetermined time period. These units are designed to link up with fire and police protection, as well as provide for remote reading of water meters . ~I know that Paul Linnee met with the people from Mikro-Tel on one occasion to explore how their proposal might fit with public safety needs. Anyway, this company now wants our permission to use 200 Richfield sites as an experiment to see if their units can, in fact, provide for efficient public safety controls and water meter reading. Their proposal is as follows: - 3 random sites within the state will be selected .for this experiment: the City of Fairmount, the City of Mankato, and the City of Richfield (small rural community, large rural community, large metropolitan community) • - a grant proposal will be submitted, on behalf of all three cities, to L.E,A,A, to fund the computer system and related hardware that will provide for the remote meter reading, burglar and fire alarms, etc. The City of Mankato has agreed to prepare and submit this application. - The only possible cost to us will be approximately .$9,000 for our share of the required L.E,A,A. match -- which I understand can be cash, or a soft match. Ken feels that any new computer equipment which we acquire through our current bidding process will qualify for our share of the match; of course, we would retain the equipment long after this experiment is over. Mikro-Tel wants a letter'of intent from us, indicating our willingness to participate in the grant application. Our participation at this point vwuld be contingent upon receipt of the grant, and we could specify that in our letter. I don't think we have anything to lose by agreeing to participate in their experiment,~and I would recommend that we provide them with a letter authorizing the City of Mankato to prepare a grant application to L.E.A.A. on behalf of the three cities. 1 v ~ 14~1~`C~t~-~'~;'I, • 750 SOUTH PLAZA ORIVG O ST. PAUL, MINtJESOTA 55120 A 612 4547710 January 2~,19?7 TO THE City. Manager Cityy• of Richfield, P~linnesota Dear Sir: ., l~le have just discussed a lo;ical presentation on a proposed two-step introduction of a miro-processor - telephone scope communication system. The first step is a proto-t,ype system consisting of two hundred units installed in selected homes or business places. the qur- pose of the proto-t,ype system would be to thorou ti11.y test and sha~~edown the concept of closely tying the City f'ur.ctions of. Police protection, ~~ire protection, and the remote reading of water meters. ' The second step i_s the installation of an entire system through- out 'the City of Richfield. Under the first step, it v~rould be our proposal to suppl~,i the fallouain: 200 - MIKRO-TEL units installed and operati.nT complete with a selected bur;J.ar alarm protection, ... ~j50.00 each a 70,000.00 1 -- PDP11 Computer system with •high s}ieeti printers, the required softvrare, and the telephone answering units, ... 25,00()•00 It is our understanding that this system-would qualify under haw Enforement Grant funds. We would ask that you so consider rnakin~; application for such a grant. It would be our pl_easu~e to.offer any necessary technical assistance .,you may require .for preparation of this application. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, tiJ. V. Cam}~`bell Vice President, P7arket•in~; WC : E~1 r CITY OF• RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 204 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen.:. Subject: Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll for 1976 Permanent Street Construction, C.P. 674 Attached to.this council letter is a resolution initiating the process for conducting special assessment hearings on the 1976 permanent paving project.. The 1976 project included areas Numbers 10 and 11 , on .the west side of the city from Penn Avenue to Xerxes Avenue, from 62nd Street to 77th Street. The total cost of this project amounted to $4,025,!:100; an estimated assessment roll is $2, 386, 000. The city received state aids on the project totaling $226,000. Follovaing preparation of the assessment roll, this project will be brought back to the council for a public hearing on the roll. It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution ordering preparation of the assessment roll. Respectfully submitted, ,,,gyp Wa ne S . Bur raaff Y gg City Manager WSB/eja cc: Finance Directo?° ~~ ~U.wCM ~'~ .~ ~'~' /.~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION DECLARING•COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR C. P. N0.~674 WHEREAS, the following construction was performed during the year 1976: Permanent Streets in the following areas: Street Im~xovement District No. 10 That area bounded on the north by W. 66th Street, east by Penn Avenue South, south by the North Service Drive of I-494 and on the west by the west city limits (Xerxes Avenue South) excluding W. 66th Street, Penn Avenue South and W. 76th Street. Street Improvement District No. 11, That area bounded on the north by the 62nd Street Crosstown, on the east by T-35W, on the south by W. 66th Street and on the west by west city limits (Xerxes Avenue South) excluding 66th Street, Penn Avenue South and Xerxes Avenue South. and, WHEREAS, the City share of costs has been paid in the sum of $4,025,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Gity of Richfield,. Minnesota as follows: 1. That the cost of permanent street construction in the above described areas to be specially assessed is hereby declared to be at least 20% of the total cost, and is presently estimated to be approximately $2,386,000, and therefore this sum will be assessed against privately owned property benefited thereby. 2. That said assessment shall run for a period of 20 years and include interest at the rate of 8% per annum. 3. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall notify the council upon completion of such proposed assessment. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 27th day of June, 1977. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk f. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA __ Office of City Manager ~ _. Council Letter No. 203 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: /o Subject: Authorization to Apply to the State of Minnesota to Participate in the Minnesota Shade Tree Disease Control Program and Continuation of the City's Grant-In-Aid Program for Private Property Tree Removal The 1977 Legislature amended the Minnesota.Shade Tree Disease Control Law to provide reimbursement to municipalities for a portion of their costs for shade tree disease control programs and reforestation. The purpose of this council letter is to request council authorization to submit a shade tree program application to the State of Minnesota, and to enter into an agreement for re- imbursement through this program. The amended Minnesota shade tree disease control iaw provides municipalities with two kinds of grants: one for sanitation, which inc~udes~ tree inspection, tree trimming, tree removal and tree disposal on public and private lands. The other grant provides reimbursement for planting new shade trees The state law requires that we apply for participation in the program for the full year of 1977 by July 1, 1977. The law has provided funding to reimburse the city up to 45% of the cost of sanitation efforts, and 50% for replanting costs. It is possible that the reimbursement for sanitation could be less than 45%, if the total amount requested by municipalities exceeds the appropriation. However, the staff has prepared an application which reflects our expected cost for 1977, assuming a 45% reimbursement. Included in the sanitation portion of the grant application is the cost of subsidizing private property tree removal. The city's shade tree disease program in 1977 provides fora total sanitation expenditure of $167, 500. Forty-five percent, or $75, 375, of this amount is being requested as a state grant. The city's planting program provides for an expend- iture of $8, 000 of which fifty percent or $4, 000 is being requested as a state grant: The amount requested for replanting is based on the number of. public trees lost to disease the preceding year; to be replaced at an estimated cost of $80 per tree. In Richfield, 100 public trees were lost last year. The sanitation grant reimbursement is based on our estimated costs for tree inspections, trimming,. Council Letter No. 203 -2- July 27, 1977 .removal and disposal, as well as the costs of subsidizing tree removal on~ private property . For the past two years, the city has had a pol-icy of subsidizing. tree removal on private property. This subsidy program has provided for 25% of the removal cost to be paid by the state, and 25% by the city, at a maximum per tree subsidy of $100, or 50% of the cost of tree removal, whichever is .less. Under the new law, the- city would be reimbursed 45% of the private subsidy. This means that, if the $100 maximum reimbursement . is retained, the city's per tree share of the subsidy would increase by $5.00. It is proposed that the maximum reimbursement per tree be established at $100 again. A resolution authorizing continuation of the city's grant-in-aid program for tree removal on private property is attached. It is recommended that the city council adopt this resolution, authorizing cpntinuation of the grant program. It is also recommended that the council authorize the city manager to submit a shade tree program application ~o the State of Minnesota, and that the May or and City Manager be authorized to execute an agreement with the State Depart- ment of Agriculture to participate in the state grant program for shade tree disease control. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Acting Public Warks Director Finance Director 6 RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION CONTINUING A GRANT-IN-AID gROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAKS 1977 AND 1978 WHEP4EAS, the State of Minnesota provides for the malting of grants pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.023, to assist residential property ocaners in removal and disposal of diseased trees, and WHEREAS, such a program will be beneficial to Richfield residents and the community as a cahole by reducing the spread of shade tree disease. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield: 1. That the City Manager continue to institute and direct the Richfield Grant-in-Aid Program for the years 1977 and 1978. 2. That the City of Richfield will provide a local subsidy to residential property owners for the removal and disposal of eligible diseased trees with the following limits: ' a. The City's Grant-in-Aid per diseased tree shall not exceed 50% of the cost of removal and disposal of that tree or $100.00, whichever is less. 3. That the subsidy determined in Paragraph 2 above includes any reimbursement to the City by the State of Minnesota pursuant to the Minnesota Shade Tree Law, Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.023, as amended in 1977. 4. That the City Manager and the Finance Director bring into effect the provisions of this resolution: Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of June, 1977. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter. No. 202 Agenda June 27, 1977 ,The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Report of League of 'dVomen Voters Survey of the Handicapped There is an item scheduled for the .June 27, 1977 city council meeting providing for the League of V1Tomen Voters to present the results of their .recent survey of the handicapped. Council members might recall that this survey was included in the winter Richfield newsletter which was circulated to all city residents in late December, 1976. Respectfully su fitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja L E~ A U E O F V1! ® N1 E ~1J ~/ A T E R S ®~ R t C i~ ~ I E L~/ Richfield, Minnesota ° Affiliated with the League of Women Voters of the U.S. _ June of 197`7 REPORT~OF LWV SURVEY OF THE HANDICAPPED IN RICHFIELD Here are the results of the survey the League of Women Voters conducted with the help of the City of Richfield. I. The original Intent of Survey - two goals: First: To identify the handicapped and their needs. Second: To assess the existing programs on all levels - local, county, state and federal. II. Results of Survey/Needs: There were 90 responses with those ranging in age from 4 to 86 years. The response from persons in their middle-years 36-59) was greater than any other-age. We had expected seniors 60 & over) to express more problems. The problems of the middle-years people need attention. °irJe think we will see an increasing need to supply services to persons t11at will enable them to stay in their own homes. ° The No. 1 "need" most often checked was Transportation. The LWV Handicapped Committee felt the other greatest needs people expressed were tiomemakin~ Assistance & Yard fork, Housing, Employment and Recreation. III. Recommendations: Transportation/Mobility! That's where it all begins! As indicated by the study, it's the greatest-unmet need. In line with LWV state and national positions on equality of opportunity on public accommodations for all persons, and because of the results of the local Survey, the League recommends that the City look into ways of improving public transportation for the handicapped. yJe recommend, too, that the City take strong measures to enforce Handicapped Parking areas. Some persons with a wheelchair need more space than is allowed for one car, in~order to transfer from car to wheelchair. There is a need to acquaint people with existing programs such as Project Checkpoint, Meals on ~dheels, Congregate Dining, Health Care and Recreation. irle would encourage the City to start an Outreach Program, 20-25 hrs. a week even; or Special Services office with a Co-ordinator for Handicapped. Someone is needed to go out to the homes and talk to the individuals. We are sending a follow-up letter to everyone who responded. - .page 2 June of 1977 REPORT OF L1r1V SURVEY 0I+' THE HANDICAPPED IN RICHFIEhD, cont' d. We wish to thank the Council for their help. Lois Bendickson, Chairman Survey JoA Bloomberg re. ident Lt°JV 9 enc: Data Tabulation A letter from Survey Copy of Questionnaire TABULATING FORM Total: 90 2. Sex: 46 Male 3. Age ,~ 0-17 4. Disabliity: 44 Female ,~ 18-35 ~ 36-59 I'z Blind 4 Deaf Cerebral Palsy 5 Arthritis Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cord Injury ~ Speech 24 60 & Over 38 Limited Mobility ,. ~ Respiratory ~ Trainable Mentally Retarded ~ .Heart ~ Learning Disability Other - as listed by respondents: 4 Polio ~ Back ~ Diabetes 1 B.K. Amputation 1 Cataracts 1 Hypoglycemia 1 Mentally Retarded l I,eg Problem '~ Nervous Breakdown 1 Aldasteronism 5. 18 Wheelchair 19 Cane l~ Brac e 6. Needs: 20 Housing Employment 16 Medical Care ~ Recreation Homemaking Assistance & Yard Work 1 Paraplegic 1 Both legs l Brain Damage 1 Chemical Dependency 1 Cystic Fibrosis l Parkinson's 1 Stroke ~ Renal Failure ~ Artificial Hips 6 Crutches ~ Walker Other Aids ~ Oxygen ~ Support 41 Transportation ~17 Education Shopping 1~ Counseling .- Other 2 Personal Care ~ Legal Services ~ Phone Communication :I. Medical Insurance 1 Home for Mentally Handicapped 1 Physical Therapy in City ~ Kidney Dialysis , 1 No Problems 7. Problems with architectural barriers - access to bldgs. or parking? 40 Yes 40 No Lwv HANQrvr4P~E"1~ sKr•Zv~~".' ~.~~, i ir,~i-: ~,II~.,Z ; ,~! , Far the past ten ,years, I have been handica-piled by a. rata ,, n ;, a.drena. l disease V~hich ha.r~ set*Crc,J-y limited my lifo. Due to thie, ~•'~^ ~ ~...."" I have only been ablo to t:orlr pr~~t tide a.nd even thin them ha.t~e been iua,ny hospitn.liza.tions and medical leaves In addition to ny illness, the otricr tt;o r~embErs of my fr:~ily are also handicapped, icy brother ha.s Par?~:insons disease a.nd ray sinter is handicrApi~ed the result of a. ca.r accidci~te bast ~.pril I in,~urcd zny bac?~ and have been totally disabled since then. I recently hAd bac'<<~ stzrg~r~- and a~ noc~ on cxutchos. !it the present tire, one taf the racr~bers. of tho fa:nir y is iz:. bed duo to pnetunonia., rand the athnr one required Phg7sical t%aerapy and is not. able to care for the hottse and ccso~. for the three of us. I arl very tha3zl.ful that a friend referred us to heals On Ylb.eels and. the CTxacery ~ta.gon, but this on7.y happorcd because any' Mister teat her at the Eandicappsd Graupo I hope the information received frory the ~,ea.~~ze of S~7amen Vetere Survey Frill shoe hart r:^uch help is needed. at times by people; ~-rith varioutt disabilititss t:~ho do not ?;.now where to turn for helpo ,~.ecidents and catastrophic illness can strike any family, ax3.d. T am, glad that .An arga.ni~ation ~.aw started ire Richfield. ~?eople in the~.r .r:~id.dle yetzro often need help, and there Ar.e no services avail- able for them. Social opportunities Are also very limited for theta, and it is difficult far individuals wha have been home for a lor:~; poriod. of tirn© to go out and gain confidence to rxix with others again. I hopes this 7-titter will help you to understand the need fox a group _in this aroA ~ro:n a person who has firsxt--hand Y•not~led~;© of being in the midcllo of rcn ex:trr3me]-y difficult ei.tua.t~.on. ~1. Person answering questions: ^ Il~anclicapped person U Member of_ family (relat.i_onshi_p ) ^ F,-iend ?, Sex: ^ Male ^ Female 3. Age: ^.0-17 ^ 18-35 ^ 36-59 ^ 60 & Over 4. Please specify your_ disability: Blind Limited I•~obili_ty Deaf P.espiratory Cerebral Palsy Trainable Mentally Retarded Arthritis heart multiple s~l~,-o: i s oth~_~ Spinal Gord injury Learning Disability (t,=Rich prevents Speech ~ parti_cipation in regular activities) 5. ~Lf you have limit:cd mobility, are any of the following required? Wheelchair Cx-utches Cane ~~a7l:er. Brace Oi~l~er Aids G. Please check tl.e areas in which you feel services are lacY.ing. If passible, l.i~i_ in order of im~~ortance to you ~-ri.th 1 being t•he most importan~_ ; Iiotzsing 'I•ransportation Employment Acc~c.ss to Education I~ledical Caro Slopping Kecreati_on Counseling homemaking Assistance Other (please explain) 7. Do you have problems with architectural barriers such as access to buildings or parking? ^ Yes No 8. Would you be ~ai_lling to take an active part in attempting to obtain more equal opportunities for all people? ^ Yes ^ Nn' . 9. Name, address and phone number (i.f you wish to be contacted in the future). '0. Comments (please include extra sheet if necessary}: ~ 1.: ,.~:.. - - _. 1~1c1II~ILI,t~ I,r,r~ct?i; c~r~ w~MI.N v~~~rrl~s SUItVhY OF IIIlNI~1C~'~I'I'hL) IN RIC111'ThLL~ 7'tle Richfield l.cagtle of Women Voters Led°ndr onsgdo n°tvcompriscnalvisfbl~ persons in Iticflfield. In rilaI"1y casc_.,, cils~ll p group, and their specific needs arc 11ot }:nowll. I~lso, handicclppecl persons may riot: Ix' a4^r~jro of E~rograllls lhat exist to sr'rve thcrn • It is the intent of this survey to identify IZichfic~lcl's handicapped residents . ~I'hc identification of the handicapped is the f.i.rst step ill the process of ciesicrning and providing programs and services to moat their needs. f'or the purpose of this survey, the following definitions tvi13. l.» ~.~~s{~d: ~ person is disrik:led if ~~ part of the body does not funr..tion in the ~vay it was intended. ]~ person is hanc___ ii~rlhhocl if he,~she has difficulty coping with some aspect of lift, because of a cl~s<lbility. /~ chronic, illness is a dis~lbility and may or may not be <~ hand i c:a p . 'lhe cluest.iorlnail-e can be filled outs by ~stions care'iuncle~r, sot if you desihe r member of the i~l~l~ily or ~ friend. If the. qu help in filling out the yuestionn~lire, you may,contur.,t Lois I3endickson, £369-451£3, or Itiiarie Richards°n, 869-9331. When you have cornpletc,d this survey, pYcasc ialscrt it in an envelope and mail to: I.WV Ilandicappecl Survey, `~/o City of itirhfieid, 6700 Portland I~venue Soutll, Richfield, 1`~1N 554'L3. " every attempt will. he made to n'aintarn tt~uest onr.Ylire twill be ~sedjfo~lnOd. The names of the rndividuuls completing _he , cthcT purpose thalZ ;`iOtifyillg th~Se pC?rSOr1S Of prOC~ra['ilS Or SerVt(:eS. IIOWeVC'.r, services t'i~~lt are effective, it is nec:cssary to know in order to plan proc~rarrls and the number of individuals and types of handicaps which they have. It is the intent °f this surt.~ey that individuals can he brought into cont~lr:t VJlth services which they may not know exist. The I,eaque of Women Voters studyvJili also include an identification of. progr<arlls, both public and•privatc;, Ieder~ll, state, cc~ullty ~lnd local,~~'111cClereive serve the handicapped. The individuals participatinct in this survey - a C°py of the f lna l survey rend study results . . .. r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • • • Office of -City Manager Council Letter No. 201 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable-Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Approval of Contract Award for Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Public Improvement Construction Work The city has a construction cooperative agreement between the city and Hennepin County for the public improvement construction work in the Lyndale/ Hub/Nicollet redevelopment area . The agreement provides for the county to award a construction contract, but only upon prior written concurrence from the city for such an award . Bids were opened on this project June 21, 1977. We are trying to accelerate the pru~edure of processing these bids as much as possible. If we can complete our staff review this week, our goal. is to obtain approval from the Richfield City Council at the council meeting Monday night and for the Hennepin County Board to award the contract at their meeting on Tuesday. Therefore, the purpose of this council letter is to recommend that the Richfield City Council approve the award of this construction contract. Inform- ation on the bids, the selection of alternates and the division of costs will not be available until Monday night. However, inasmuch as -the city council has previously approved the final plans and specifications and an agreement covering the division of costs, it is our hope that this item can be handled as a procedural matter so that Hennepin County will have the opportunity to consider action on awarding bids on Tuesday. Respectfully submitted, ~J. Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Acting Public Works Director Planning and Redevelopment Director CITY OF RLCHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 200 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable 1\~ayor , and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Authorization to Ca11 for Bids On the June 27, 1y77 city council agenda there is an item requesting authorization to call for bids for the pumping and distribution system for Well No. 7, City Project No. 695. Council members will recall that acon- fract was let for the drilling of this new supply well last summer. 1'he drilling of this well was the first phase of City Project No. 695. After completion of the well drilling, the city's consulting engineers have finalized pumping and distribution plans and specifications for use cf the well, including replacement of landscaping in front of the treatment plant building. Landscaping will also be provided on the north side of the building to screen the lime sludge lagoon and the backwash recirculation system constructed last year. It is the recommendation of the acting public works director, in which I concur, that the city council authorize the call for bids for the pump and distribution system for Well No. 7. Respectfully subm cted, G~~~ ' Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja lobs ~ee~' /y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No, ly9 Agenda May 23, 1977 (deferred) Agenda June 13, 1977 (deferred) Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Amendment to ~;loritorium on Filling of Full Time Vacancy During the 1977 budget hearings the city council established a moratorium on the filling of full time vacancies. The purpose of this letter is to request that, this moratorium be amended to permit the filling of the personnel director vacancy . The position is fully funded in the 1 y77 budget and it is recornmended that the moritori.um be amended as proposed. Respectfully submitted, l~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja i~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 198 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable. Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Block Party Barricades Nr. Walter Aldrich, 6915 Logan Avenue, has requested permission to barricade Logan Avenue between 69th and 70th Streets on Saturday, July 23, 1977 between the hours of 12 noon and midnight, for the purposes of holding a blQCk party. Ms. Lynda Jones, 214 W. 73rd Street, has requested permission to barricade 73 1/2 Street between Pillsbury and Pleasant Avenues on Sunday, July 3, 1977 between 12 noon and midnight for purposes of holding a block party. The only stipulations attached to such requests are that the city erect the barricades and that they be erected in such a way so as to permit ingress and egress of emergency vehicles should that be necessary during the time of the block party. Respectfully submitted, ~~- Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Public Safety Director Acting Public Works Director '' CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council. Letter No. 197 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Resolution Authorizing Redevelopment and Improvement Bond Issues for 1977 s The. purpose of this council letter is to propose a resolution, of which a copy is attached, to authorize the issuance of a total $9,200,000 general obligation improvement and redevelopment bonds . Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Redevelopment Bond Issue On the HRA agenda. for the June 27, 1977 meeting, there is a resolution re- questing the city council to issue $4, 700,-000 in redevelopment bonds for the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet redevelopment project. The proposed bond issue will provide funds primarily for the K-Mart project and other related L/H/N acquisition costs. While the tax increment bonds will _ be a general obligation issue, it is anticipated that there will not be a need for the use of ad valorem tax to provide debt service on this bond issue. Pro- jections indicate that increment to be received from the K-Mart Project together . with increment to be received from the general appreciation of property values in the tax increment area will be adequate to cover debt. service requirements for this bond issue. Other proceeds from the tax increment project will also be available in the remote possibility the anticipated tax increment does not prove to be adequate. Public Improvement Bond Issue Council members will recall that the 1976 street improvements were financed by a temporary internal bond issue and that it is ultimately necessary to sub- stitute apermanent issue for such an arrangement. In addition, the city has .awarded contracts for the 1977 street improvements which a re currently underway. ' It is anticipated that the contract for the L/rI'/N public improvements will be awarded this coming week with actual construction to occur during 1977 and 1978. Council Letter No. 197 -2- Agenda June 27, 1y77 It has been determined necessary and desirable for the city to issue a permanent public improvement bond issue at this time to cover the-1976 improvements and those currently underway this year. The sale of this bond issue in the amount of $4, 500, 000 would make it possible for the city to finance the Lynda le/Hub/ Nicollet public. improvements which will occur over a period of years by temporary bond issues which would ultimately have to be replaced by a permanent issue. The permanent street improvement project was originally planned to be implem- ented over aseven=year period and was subsequently reduced to a six-year pro- gram. The city policy on assessments indicated that the assessment policy would remain unchanged over the period of the program even though the cost could be expected to increase and the amount of state aid reimbursement decrease.. .The net effect of this policy has been that the cost of these street improvements not covered by state aid reimbursement or assessments has gradually increased each year. This was anticipated when the program was- initiated and there have been debt service levies for the last two years to support these public improvement bond issues. The following indicates the percentage of cost not covered by state aid or assessments for each of the years in the street improvement program: Year 1972 Project 1973 Project 1974 Project 1975 Project 1976 Project 1977 Project Percent of Cost Not Covered by State Aid Or Assessments -0- 17.8% .23.3% 33.0% 36.5% (Est. ) 70.0% (Est.) The proposed $4, 500, 000 bond issue will consist of the following items: Permanently funded temporary bonds $3,127, 000 (City Project 674) Financing 1977 Street improvements 1, 316, 000 (City Project 686) Allowances for discount on sale of bonds 57, 000 Total Proposed Bond ?ssue $4, 500, 000 While the assessment roll has not been- adopted on either the 1976 or 1977 projects, we are assuming that approximately 1/3 of the total possible assessments Council Letter No. 197 -3- Agenda June 27, 1977 will be prepaid. Since the project was initiated, prepayments have come- in at the rate of 34.5%, 27.2%, 40%, and 35.5% for the years 1973 through 1976. There- fore, -the assumption. of 33% prepayment seems reasonable and reduces the amount of principal which must be included in the bond issue. In 1977 the debt service levy for the various street improvement bond issue amounted to $422, 400. The design of the proposed issue together with a combin- ation of the debt service for the other street improvement issues, is expected to make it possible for us to stabilize the debt service levy for the next ten years at approximately $300, 000 per year. It should be emphasized, however, that the ability to accomplish this .objective is contingent on the interest rate received for the current issue; prepayments actually received for 1976 and 1977 projects and the amount of special assessments that are paid up each year. Bond Issue Schedule Adoption of the attached resolution will permit adequate advertising and receipt of bids .for the $9,200,000 redevelopment and improvement bond issue on July 27, 1977. Bids would be opened at 11:30 a.m. and awarded at a special city council meeting at 12:15 p.m. on the same day. It is recommended that the city council take the following actions: ~1. Adopt the attached resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of $4, 700, 000 general obligation redevelopment bonds of 1977 and $4, 500, 000 general obligation improvement bonds of 1977. 2. Call a special council meeting for 12:15 p.m. Wednesday, July 27, 1977 for the purpose of considering bids on these bonds and the .taking of other appropriate action . Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~• ~~ r`~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Finance Director City Attorney RED:<OLU`~'ION NO. A RESOLL'TIOiV AUTHORILIia~ ~i'I~E . TSSUAivCL A:iD SAL.i:~ OF $t~,700,000 G1~N;_:RAL OBLIG?>TIOI`T KFDi~VELOPMT'NT BCNi7S OF 1977 and $4 , 500, 000 Gi~:i3~RAL OBLTGATIOP3 IP1:PIZOVI~P~SL•'I.1T BOT•:DS OF 1977 WHEREFS,' by Resolution No. 57]7 , this Council authori zeci the issuance and sale of separate series of General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds to finance public redevelopment costs in the Lyndale-Y.ub-Nicollet Redevelopment Area (the "Project Area"), anc~. . T%v'IiEF.EAS, the I-Iousi ng and F.edeveloprnent Authority of the City of Richfidld (HRA) has by resolution of June 27, 1977 reciuested the~City to issue its General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 (the "1977 Redevelopment Bons") to finance Public Recevelopment Costs in the Project Area presently estimated to be as follows: Department Store Parcel s_ I:-~I~Iart) Project Costs Acquisition $ 1,746,765 Relocation 321,000 Demolition 134,000 Appraisals 12,000 Legal Services 25,000 Engineering Services (City) 20,175 Accounting Services (City) 10,000 Consulting Fames - 15,000 Miscellaneous Expenses 5,000 Administration 160,000 Contingency (10%) 250,560 Other Project Area Costs Anticipation tax payments _100,000 P,epaymen'c to C~.ty - BRt~l Contract 70, 000 Related Acquisition Costs 1,030,000 Total Redevelopre~ent Costs to Se_Financed 3,900,000 Capitalized Interest (3 years at 5.50) 720 000 f hiscellaneous issuance costs and discount 80,000 TOTAL BONll ISSUE 4,700,000 and, V7I~fEREAS, all conditions and requirements necessary for the"issuance and sale of the 1977 Redevelopment Bonds pursuant to r~Iinnesota Statutes, Section 462.5II5, Subdivision 4, have been performed, and WIEREAS, it is further deterrined that assessable public improvements (the ''Improvements'') have been made and duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof by the City pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429: Project Designation Project Costs 1976.Permanent Street Improvement Projects $3,127,000 1977 Permanent Street In?provement Projects 1,316,000 and, C•VHEREAS, it is hereby found and determined to be necessary and expedient to the said financial management of the City to issue and sell $4,500,000 General Obligation Improve?ent Bonds of 1977 (the "1977 Irnprovernent Bonds") to provide permanent financing of the costs listed above and related financing costs: NOS^7, TI~iEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CT~l~Y COUIv'CIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINiJESO~i"'A, .AS FOLLOjdS 1. Redevelopment Bonds. 1.01. ~~'he City of Richfield shall issue and sell its General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 in the amount of $4,620,000. 1.02. In order to provide in part the additional interest required to ~r~arket bonds at this time additional bonds shall be •issued in the amount of $30,000, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, which amount does not exceed 20 of the amount otherwise authorized. Any excess of the purchase price over the sure of $4,620,000 shall be credited to the debt service fund ~'~ hereafter created for the 1977 Redevelopment Ponds for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on said bonds. The principal aggregate amount;of the 1977 Redevelopment Bonds to be issued is $4,700,000. 1.03. It is hereby determined that the maturity schedule of the 1977 Redevelopment Bonds when combined with the maturity schedule of the 1977 Improvement Bonds herein authorized, the $6,300,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1973, the $3,300,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1974 and the $4,600,000 General Obligation Tmprovorlent Eonc~s of 1975, all of which bonds have been issued by the City to finance its Permanent Street Improver,ent Project, conforms to the requirements of rinnesota Statutes, Section 475.54, Subdivision 1, and the combined maturities of the 1977 Redevelopment Bonds and the 1977 Irnprovement Bonds are hereby designated as combined maturities as provided in Subdivision 2 of that section. 2. .The 1977 Irnprovement Eonds. 2..01. The City of Richfield shall issue and sell its General Obligation Improvement Eonds of 1977 in the amount of $4,443,000. 2.02. In order to provide in part the additional interest required to market bonds at this tirne additional bonds shall be issued in the amount of $57,000, as authorized by i~iinnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, which arnount does not exceed 20 of the amount otherwise authorized. Any excess of the purchase -price over the sum~of $4,443,000 shall be credited to the debt service fund herein- after created for the 1977 Improvement Bands for the purpose of paying interest first coming due on said bonds. The principal aggregate ar:-~ourt of 1977 Improvement Bonds to be issued is $4,500,000. 3. Sale of 1977 Kedevelopment and Improvement Bonds. 3.01.. The 1977 Redevelopment Bonds and 1977 Improvement Bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the following official T~otice of Sale: OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE $4,700,000 C-eneral Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1.977 $4,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1977 City of Richfield Hennepin County, Ivlinnesota NOTICE IS HEREBY GTVEN, that sealed bids for the purchase of $9,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment and Improvement Bonds (-the "Fonds`°) of the City of Richfield, Ainnesota, will be received until 11:30 A.P~I. , central time, on D~ledi~esday, July 2.7, 1977, in the office of the City I~Ianager at 6700 Portland Avenue South, P.ichfield, Pinnesota 55423, at which time the bids will be opened and tabulated. The City CoL?ncil will meet at 12:15 p.m. on the same date to consider said bids. ~ Purpose and Security The proceeds of the Redevelopment Bonds will be used to finance the public redevelopment costs associated with a redevelop ment project undertaken by the Dousing and P,ecleveloprnent Authority of the City and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.585, Subdivision 4, and Chapter 475. The Redevelopment Bonds are payable primarily from tax incrernents to be derived frozr~ increases in the taxable valuation of property. within a Redeveloprent Project Area in the City, but are general abligations of the City for Cvhich the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City will be pledged. The proceeds of the Improvement Bonds will be used to finance various assessable street improvement projects within the City and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475. The Irprovement Bonds are payable primarily from special assessments against benefitted properties,. but are general obligations of the City for which the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City will be pledged. ~ Date and Maturities Tile Bonds wi11 be dated August 1, 1977, will be in the denomination of $5,000 (unless otherwise requested by purchaser within 48 hours of the sale), and wi11 mature on February 1 in the following years and amounts: YEAR REDEVELOPMENT EONbS IMPROVEMEr~T BONDS TOTAL 1980 $ 25,000 $175,000 $200,000 1981 '25,000 175,000 200,000 1982 25,000 175,000 200,000 1983 25,000 200,000 225,000 1984 75,000 200,000 275,000 1985 105,000 200,000 305,000 (continued .. ) YEAR 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 199?_ 1993 1994 1995 ,1996 199? REDFVELOPi4iEi~T'.I' FONDS $110,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 250,000 275,000 350,000 425,000 500,000 585,000 675,000 725,000 $9~, 7700, 000 IP~PROVPI~IEN'i BOi1DS $225,000 2?.5, 000 225,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 300,000 300x000 300,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 _ $4,500,000 Redemption Feature TOTAL $335,000 375,000 x00,000 450,000 500,000 525,000. 650,000 7?_5, 000 800,000 935,000 1,025,000 1, 075, 00_0 $9,200,000 A11 Bonds maturing after February 1, 1987, are subject to prior redemption at the option of the City in inverse order of serial numbers on said date at par and accrued interest. Interest, Interest on the Bonds of both issues will be payable on February 1, 1978, and semiannually thereafter on each August 1 and. February 1. All Bonds maturing on the same date must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniforra rate, not exceeding the rate specified for bonds of any subsequent maturity. No r,~ore than ten interest rates in ascending order raay be specified. Each rate must be in an integral multiple of 5/1Q0 of 1%, and no rate of interest nor the net effective average rate of the issue may exceed 7o per annum. No supplemental or "B" coupons will be permitted. Paying Agent Principal and interest will be made payable at a suitable bank recommended by the purchaser and approved by the Council, and the City iri11 pay customary charges for this service provided that such recommendation is received within 48 hours after the sale and the Council will select the paying agent if_ the recommendation is not approved. CU5TP Nur~~.bers she City will assume no obligation for the assignir~ent or printa.ng of CUSIP numbers on the bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will. permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the ef:pense of the purchaser, if f.he purchaser waives any extension of~the tune of deliver= caused thereby. Delivery Yyithin 40 days after sale, the City will furnish and deliver to the office of the purchaser or, at his option, will deposit with a bank in the United States selected by him and approved by the City as its agent to permit examination by and to deliver to the purchaser, the printed and executed bonds, the unqualified opinion thereon of bond counsel, and a certificate stating that no litigation is any manner questioning their validity is then threatened or pending. `.i'he charge of the delivery agent must be paid by the pL?rchaser, but all other coats will be paid by the City. The purchase price must be paid upon delivery of the bonds, or within five days after deposit with the delivery agent, in funds available for expenditure by the City on the day of payment. Legal Opinion An unqualified legal opinion on the bonds will be furnished by T4essrs. LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion will state that the bonds are valid 'and binding general obligations of the City, and the City is obligated and required to levy taxes for the principal and interest thereon as the same become due without limit as to rate or amount. Type of Bid - Amount Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the ti.r.?e specified above. Bids must be for all bonds of both issues. The issues will not be sold separately. Comparison of bids will be made on the basis of total net interest cast combining both issues. Bids must be for all or none of the $9,200,000 General Obligation Bonds of both issues and must be unconditional and must be accompanied by a cashier's or certified check or bark draft in the amount of $184,000, payable'to the City Clerk-Treasurer, to be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and bidder fails to co:~?ply therewith. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of bonds to stated maturities, less any cash premium, plus any discount) will be deemed the Host favorable. i~:o oral bids and no bid of less than $x,063,000 for $9,200,000 principal amount of the Bonds, plus accrued interest on all of-the Borids will be considered. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. BY ORDER OF TiiE~ CIT'~ COUNCIL Dated: June. 27, 1977 Thomas J. Moran City Clerk--Treasurer City of P.ichfield, Minnesota 3.02. The City Clerk-Treasurer is authorized and directed to. advertise the 1977 Redevelopment Eonds and the 1977 Irnprovement Eonds for sale in accordance with the foregoing notice of sale and to cause the abbreviated notice of sale attached hereto as Exhibit `'A", to be published in the manner required by law. The City Council shall meet on ~7ednesday, July 27, 1977, at 12:15 o`clock p.m. for the purpose of_ considering sealed bids on the Bonds and taking any other appropriate action. Passed by the City Counr_il of the City of Richfield, this 27th day of June, 1977. Ir~ren L. Law N~ayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk Exhibit "A" NOTICE OF SALL•' $4,700,000 General Obligation Redevelopment~Bonds of 1977 $4,500,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1977 City of Richfield • Hennepin County, Minnesota . NOTICE TS ~IERJ'EY GIVEN, that sealed bids for the purchase of $9, 200-, 000 General Obligation P.edevelopr,!ent and Improvement ~ioncs of 1977 (the "Bonds") of the City of Richfield, Pinnesota, ~•~ill be received until 11:30 o`clock a.m., central time, on ~~;ednesday, July 27, 1977 at the office of the City T~~anager at 6700 Portland Avenue South, ~Riciifield, Ainnesota 55423, at which time -the bids ~•ai11 be opened and tabulated. The City Council will meet at 12:15 p.m. on the same day to consider said bids. Dated August 1, 1977, the Bonds twill mature on February 1 in •the years .and amounts as follows: YEAR REDEVELOP`-!Ei3T BOi3DS IMPROVL'i~ii:,NT BONDS TOTA:i, 1980 $ 25,000 $175,000 $ 200,000 1:81 25,000 175,000 200,000 1982 25,000 175,000 200,000 1983 25,000 200,000 225,000 1984 75,000 200,000 275,000 1985 105,000 200,000 305,000 1986 110,000 225,000 335,000 1987 150,000 225,000 375,000 1988 175,000 225,000 400,000 1989 .200,000 250,000 450,000 1990 250,000 250,000 500,000 1991 275,OOU 250,000 525,000 1992 350,000 300,000 650,000 1993 425,000 300,000 725,000 1994 500,000 300,000 800,000 1995 585, 000 350,000 935, 000 1996 675, 000 350,000 1, 025, 000 1997 725, 000 350000 1, 075, 000 $4,700,000 X4,500,000 $9,200,000 Interest payable on February: 1, 1978 and semiannually thereafter on August 1 and February 1 in each year. A11 bonds maturing after February 1, 1937, subject to prior rede,~~ption at the option of the City on said date at a price of par plus accrued interest. Rates must be specified in. integral multiples of 5/100 of 1 o and no rate may e;~ceed 7 ~ per annum. 2~IiniraLUn price of $9,063, 000 . .: An unqualified approving opinion will be furnished by Messrs. LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Draws of Palinneapolis, Minnesota. TYze proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance a redevelopment project and various assessable public improvements in the Ci~Ly. BY ORDER OF ^1 HE CITY COUNCIL Thomas J. Moran City Clerk--Treasurer Dated: June 27, 177 City of Richfield, Minnesota Further information: T.G. Evensen & Associates= 1910 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 5502 (612) 338-3535 l la CITY OF RICHFIELD , MINNESO TA Office of City Manager Council Ietter No. 196 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Ricb.field Gentlemen: Subject: Resolution Supporting Stadium Proposal Maycr Law has requested that there be an item on the June 27, 1977 city council agenda for council consideration of a resolution supporting the City of Bloomington's stadium proposal. Bloomington has prepared a preliminary location and schematic site plan proposal for submission to the I~~ietropolitan Area Sports Commission which provides for remodeling and additions to the present Metropolitan Sports Complex. Respectfully submitted, ~~ / .` ~~~~ Wayne S . Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON°S "PRELIMINARY LOCATION AND SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN PROPOSAL" SUBMITTED TO THE METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILITIES COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield is the official governing body of the City of Richfield, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield is one of the owners of the Metropolitan Sports Area now operated by the Metropolitan Sports Area Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the various proposals and ideas to upgrade and .provide improved facilities for professional baseball and footba 11. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the City Council recognizes the need for improved facilities for both professional football and professional baseball, and believes that the most beneficial manner of providing these facilities is to upgrade existing facilities and provide any new facilities on the Metropolitan Sports Area land as proposed by the City of Bloomington's "Preliminary Location and Schematic Site Plan Proposal" . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be sent to Mr. Dan G. Brutzer, Chairman, Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, in evidence of the City of Richfield's support for retaining professional sports facilities at the site of the present Metropolitan Sports Complex. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of June, 1977. Loren L. Law MAYOR ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 195 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Supplemental Assessment. Hearing for Oak Grove Lutheran Church Property Attached is a letter from Oak Grove Lutheran Church requesting consider- ation by the city of a street improvement assessment against a triangular piece of property owned by the church. The property is shown on the attached sketch and has limited use potential. The current assessment against this property is $3, 348.12. This assess- ment was made in accordance with the city's policy of assessing full costs against all frontage of tax exempt property. The church appealed the assess- ment at the September 13, 1976 assessment hearing, but at that time the assess- ment was sustained by the city council. If the city council wishes to reconsider the assessment against this property, it will be necessary to establish a hearing date for considering such. a supple- mental assessment. A supplemental hearing can be held if the council determines that the original assessment contained errors and/or omissions. It is suggested that the date for such a potential hearing be the fir-s-t etincr in jul~z. Respectfully submits CJ Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB/eja cc: Acting Public Works Director Finance Director City Attorney ~~~~ IJ JU~I 22 1977 Ric~lziei~ Lityf ~Jlanag~r OAK GROVE L U T'H E R A N C H U R C H ,1. 71ST AND LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH ~ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 'd' PHONE 869-4917 June ~2, 1977 City Council Richfield, ton. 55423 Dear~Councii Members: A suggestion has been made that an adjustment be considered on the assessment for paving and street lighting that has been charged against the triangle of land, situated immediately South of 71st Street and East of Lyndale Avenue, which is owned by Oak Grave Lutheran Church. It appears this should be a workable possibility but the amount of the adjustment should be logically determined. Perhaps property valuation might be a basis for such an adjustment, if it were possible to calculate the value of a valueless piece of ground. However, if there is any basis for figuring its value, certainly square feet of area is a logical basis to use. The remainder of this discussion is based on a "per square foot" analysis. The piece of property is approximately 300' long by 50' on list street and coming to a point at the South end. Thus this property has about 30Ox~0/2 = 7500 square feet. It is assumed that approximately 300' of paving 'on Augsburg Avenue has been assessed against the property to date to arrive at the figure of $3,343.12. Eventually, of course, there will be another approximately 300' assessed against the property when Lyndale Avenue is resurfaced, making a total of 600' of paving assessed against the property. if we assuta~e for the moment that a normal pity lot is 50' wide by 124' long, and having b250 square feet of area, this lot will have assessed against it only 50' of paving. On an equitable basis the triangle of property in question should have (750U/6250)50 = 60' of paving assessed against it. This is just 10% of the 600' that will eventually be assessed against our hapless piece of property. This being the case it would seem justified to request that the assessment of $3,34$.12 be reduced to $334.31 and that a similar multiplier of (0.1) be applied to the normal costs for the future paving of Lyndale Avenue. Sincerely, ELY/k Oak Grove Lutheran Church ~~ - . X Earl L. Youngren, Treasurer ,- 4 NI A W. 70th ST. ' - ~- 37.6 ~ N ~~ {1.1 7 W a 0 z r W m a CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager . Council Letter No. 194 Agenda June 27, 197? The Honorable Mayor • and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject; Tabulation of Bid Minutes and Award of Bid for Vacuum Street Sweeper Attachment On June 16, 1977 bids were opened by the city manager in accordance with previous city council authorization for a vacuum street sweeper attachment to be installed on our existing Vac-•A11 truck. The acting public works director, environmental health director and city clerk represented the city at the bid opening. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for city council review. Council members may. recall tl'iat at the council meeting of April 11, 1977, bids were rejected for a Vacuum Street Sweeper because the bids meeting specif- ications were in excess of the $44, 000 allocated in the budget. Since that time, it has been determined by the acting public works director-that our present needs for a vacuum street sweeper care be met by obtaining a vacuum street sweeper attachment to install on our current vac-all truck. The only bid received for the vacuum street sweeper attachment is from MacC7ueen Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $12,115,00. The staff has revie~>>ed this bid, and it is recommended that the council take the following actions: 1. Approve the bid minutes. 2. Approve the award of the bid to MacQueen Equipment, Tnc. in the amount of $12, 115.00. Respectfully submitted, / ~,(~ ~ ~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB~~eja cc; Public Works Director Finance Director CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening -June 16, 1977 Vacuum Street Sweeper Attachment installed on existing Vac-All Truck Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative staff was called by Wayne S. Burggraaff, City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids on a Vacuum Street Sweeper Attachment to be installed on existing Vac-A11 Truck, as advertised in the official newspaper on the first of June, 1977. Present: Wayne S. Burggraaff, City Manager Marshall Raaen, Acting Public Works Director I. F. Roesler, Environmental Health Director Thomas 3.~Moran, City Clerk The following bid was submitted and read aloud; BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAI. BTD MacQueeri Equipment Inc. 5% Bid Bond $12,115,00 (30 days) The City Manager announced that the bid would be tabulated and considered at the. regulax council meeting of June 27, 1977. Thomas J. Moran City Clerk ~ 0~9 lD Fi F.U lD n O (D cF W O n lD trJ W (D c+ V H n BN. '~ cF r~ c+ 0 ~n N N Vt ' r O (D fD to tTJ N • d ~ ~ c+ H n bci ~ ~ Vl U1 C] H k ~ T 1 _ f N V W H d C1 bd ~ bd H ~ ~ ~ Ned ~ ~ ~ (D CIS F-'• n ~ ~i -J r~ c+ (.~, fD I F'• (D W O O c+ ~ .. ~ U] td ~ c~D P~ ~ (D ~ m N (D (D O~ K N V J? V ~1J C^^,,~ t' N -~ (~ 1 lD ci- F' c+ N N (D ~+ O {(D 1"1 ~• ci- F-' Oil C n K n x ~s~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 193 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Resignation of Senior/Handicapped Citizens Commission Member Attached is a letter from Mr. Andrew F. Jensen, announcing his resignation from the Senior/Handicapped Citizens Commission as he is moving out of the City of Richfield. This v~~ill leave a vacancy on the commissie~n for a term which will expire on February 1, l y 7 8. Respectfully submitted, ~, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja .~ ~ s ~ ,.14 ` ~. - .. ., •~t ~ 1~ •~ s ! , ~ .,r+, _ t :. ~ ~~~~ G~ ~,~~. s mss- 2~ ,/ r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ r ~~y~~~~C,~~~~ -'`z~ ~ Cry ~~~~~ ti ~~~~ . A :., ~~ ~~ ~ _~ ,, -~ r w .. GG~ . ~ ~_ -.~ ~~ .~~ - ,~. '~ y a .. ,v / r '• ,. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 192 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and • Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Traffic Control Requests The Traffic Control Committee met on Tuesday, June 21, 1977 to review pending requests for traffic controls. Minutes of that meeting are attached to tl'iis council letter as well as a copy of the criteria established to warrant installation of traffic control devices. Based on review of these requests, the committee makes the following recommendations: Stop Signs Oakland Terrace at Lakeview Avenue: The request for a one way stop sign to stop Oakland Terrace traffic at Lakeview Avenue be reviewed further. 68th Street at Xerxes Avenue : The request for atwo-way stop sign to stop Xerxes Avenue traffic at 68th Street be denied. Other Traffic Controls "No Parking Anytime, " north side of 77th Street, Stevens to Second Avenue: Extension of the "No Parking Anytime" restriction on the north side of 77th Street eastward from Stevens Avenue to Second Avenue. "No Parking Anytime, " W. Pleasant Avenue, 62nd to 65th Streets: Establishment of "No Parking Anytime" on West Pleasant Avenue between 62nd and 65th Streets . . Council Letter No. 192 -2- June 27, 1977 Deferred Item The committee also recommends that "No Parking, 3:30-5:30 p, m. " signs be installed on the west side of Lyndale Avenue between 74th Streit and 76th Street. Residents who petitioned these traffic controls have been notified of the committee recommendations . Respectfully submitted, WSB/eja cc: Administrative Assistant Acting Public Works Director Police Captain Public Safety Director ~ ~. ~. ~ ; Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager TRAFFIC CONTROL COMMITTEE MINUTES • June 21, 1977 The Traffic Control. Committee convened at 8;15 a. m. , June 21, 1977 Members present were: T. Morgan, M. Raaen, R. Richardson, j. Wilde. The Committee considered the following items: 1-. "No Parking Anytime; North side of 77th Street, Stevens to 2nd Avenue• J. Wilde reported that this request was received from a resident at the intersection of 77th Street and Stevens Avenue, adjacent to the spot where present parking restrictions end. The request was initiated because of congestion resulting from parking for patrons of businesses in the area. M . Raaen observed that this area did have parking restrictions prior to • completion of the street paving project. The committee recommends extension of the "No Parking Anytime" res- triction on the North side of 77th Street from Stevens Avenue east to 2nd Avenue. 2. Oakland Terrace at Lakeview Avenue; j. Wilde reported that this request was fora sign to stop Oakland Terrace traffic, at Lakeview Avenue. R. Richardson reported that no accidents have occurred at this intersection within the last 5 years. M. Raaen reported that traffic counts were very low. Committee members observed that the intersection is adjacent to a city park area . The committee recommends that the warrants ..for installation of a one- way stop sign are not met, but that the proximity of the park could be considered in evaluating this request. 3. 68th at Xerxes Avenue: J. Wilde noted that this request had also been submitted to the City of Edina, since the west side of Xerxes Avenue is in the Edina city limits. The Edina Traffic Control Committee has rec- ommended that this request be denied, in that the warrants for installation of a two-way stop sign are not met, x. Richardson reported that Public Safety Department records indicate one accident at this intersection in the past 5 years. The committee voted to recommend denial of this request. 4. Survey of 68th Street: This request was received from the R.I.N.G. committee in the L/I~I/N area, and is based on a change in the project plan which would leave 68th Street open. The committee tabled this request pending completion of the public improvements in the project area . 5. "No Parking Anytime, " 68th - 69th on Xerxes Avenue; J. Wilde reported that neighbors were concerned .with parking by employees and customers of businesses on York Avenue. It is the committee's determination that no~ specific problems exist on the Richfield side of Xerxes Avenue to warrant establishment of parking prohibitions . 6 "No Parking Anytime'; W. Pleasant Avenue, 62nd - 65th Streets• The Public Safety Department has requested consideration of parking restrictions on this area of West Pleasant because of concern that parking narrows the street in such a way that travel of emergency vehicles would be hindered. T. Morgan noted that parking is prohibited on West Pleasant south of 65th St. The committee recommends establishment of "No Parking Anytime" on W. Pleasant Avenue between 62nd and 65th Sts. < y ~ ~ T rq ., r 4 -_ 1 t, '.AAA 1.JJ.t -- "" . i _ ~' ) } ~ ~: ~. 1 . ~. d f: ~ ,e+ 1 lS i, a r . .) ~ . • ~ ~ ~ I~ J ? C`. i.. 1 ~ 1 \;~ (,~ ~ ! l ~ • 1 ~ 1 i ^ , . . . e 1. .. - ` .. I - y r: ~ yy ~ l?:141 ~.. t 1:~:~~r :~; ~ f 'i!~1 tom: ~-. o ... 4 .. .- . e . , . .. _ , .. ,, , ~/ ys~'~ ,_ f._. - M1 ..'s L.1~~ ... .. '.1 ~: ~t=" ,(-; 1'i. C~ <I. .. t - ... .1. i, i ~1. - .. f ,t .: , - _ c, - - _. .. . _ ,' _ f _ .. ,,. , J _ r! r .A , ~ , ~~~~ ~ _. - C- :, all V _).. ~. '. :off ro.. .-, ..~r .. ... - 5 • ~ .. .. '..~ 4 .. .a. . f . _.. ~ ~ :.J ~. f: i a A 1,., 1~ A~t ~ i,l ~~.~ ~.• ~_ ~ fig A C(: .-. ~h~i~.. r~: . . ,. ~)`;~... ... .-': ~_ _ ,vl S'.~:,ti .?': P.k~ .~-, '`.._,ia ..,lip \?~ '~,. S 7:.r C .! r't .... '.~i f~~.s' v .. ~~-.. ., r .;e,hy 1-- 1 ,_1'r'.. r 1 5 ~,':; ,-y .. x,.t Cf'.' -, ~".. .- i~.' l~f^. , : t_J. Ll- ti.J.... .:1:.i1 _~ :l%..~+, "d~L6~ ~ T'l ,~i-:, 1~7. ~}' l.)~ .. y ~1 _, _, ._ r f . , .. .._;'- 3 ' l.: ; :`. '.i ~ r.. _. ~_. i<: 4 ~... 1 r, A ). 1. i. ~ sy ; ;._.f f ' - - _ _ Pi s°r--... . et..L: .:..'.~X'~ ... .. < ~ i .- _ t i, 1 ._ ", i. ..:i.. -A `_` ~._~ ~`} _ _. -. r .1"r-~ .. - _ ,_ ..., ' - - ..., - .. .. .. _ A ~' X13 ., J'~f'.- ~ A' - - ~. ..<..> ,.. ~ '<!'. 1A!.~;.jt _ _. k41. .iC; ~...Jt_A 6.. i.~ d... -C:.~fa4 ~~~.< .. .. ~ -. .. - r - ~_ _ f, ~. ., r i. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ' Y Council Letter No. 191 Agenda June 27, 1977 The Honorable Mayor '` .and Members of the City Council- ` City of Richfield Gentlemen; Subject: Plans for Construction of Noise Barrier Walls and Landscaping Along I-3SW At-the- May 23, 1y77 city council meeting, the council approved the -" Minnesota Department of.Transportation plans and specifications for con- struction of noise barrier walls and. landscaping along I-35W between 63 1/2 .Street to between Clinton and 4th Avenues. Council members might recall that those plans provided for the barrier to sto at a the east side of Aldrich Avenue, and be continued eaptward aga n fromy a point just slightly west of Garfield Avenue. In response to a request from a resident at that meeting, the council did ask the staff to contact the Department of Transportation and request them to consider extending the wall east of Aldrich to approximately the west edge of Lyndale Avenue. Attached is the response received from the highway division. It is their conclusion ,that extension of the wall would not be feasible, for the several reasons noted in their letter. It is recommended that the council accept and file this report. The individual who had expressed interest in requesting that the, wall be ex- tended has .aeen sent a copy of the letter from the Department of Trans- porta tion . Respectfully submitted, 7~ ~. Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Public Works Director Public Safety Director Planning & Redevelopment Director ts~NN~spT~ o ~^~, 2 n _ ~ ^~ ° ~ Minnesota Department of Transportation ~ District Five 'yTpJ= j~P~O 5801 Duluth Street Golden Palley, h4innesota 55422- June 2, 1977 ,~Ui~ ~, 19i7 Mr . Marshall Raaen ~!~ 0$ ~.~~,ft~iUtt~ Acting Public Works Director City of Richfield 67.00 Portland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55423 RE: S.P. 27II2-187 (35w'} Noise Barriers bettaeen E. & W. Junctions of C.S.A.H. 62 Dear Mr. Raaen: Your letter of May 25 to K. J. Anderson regarding an exten- sion of-the above referenced noise wall was referred to me for investigation aril reply. Upon your request, we re-analyzed the situation at 6233 Al- drich Avenue as to the possibility of extending the barrier beyond its presently proposed. location... Based on the re- sults of this further analysis, we must deny the request. Following are some of the factors involved in making this decision: -• An extension of the caall to the front building line of the Doctor's Office would reduce noise levels by only about 3 decibels (which we consider to be a relatively insignificant reduction}. (612)545-37b1 The estimated cost of providing the proposed extension would be $5,000 to $10,000. We do not consider this to be cost-effective) as it would benefit only, one ,home by 3 decibels. - There are a number of underground utilities located in the area of the proposed extension cahich would greatly complicate construction. Also, the amount of right-of- way available is extremely limited in this area. - The contract for. this project has already been let. Although this .does not make it impossible to make changes, An Equal Opportunity Employer J .4 r. t` Page 2 ~ k)U~ ~'~ ~`.i~~ ~~'t~ cf l:;sz~t~ i~ it obviously does complicate the matter somewhat. Again ,. because of these factors, tae do not feel it is jus- tified to extend the barrier as requested. If .you have any further questions, please feel free to call. Mr. Marshall Raaen June 2, 1977 Sincerely, . ~_ R. D. I3orson, P.E. District Layout, Research and Development Engineer RDI~ : mh CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 206 Agenda June 13, 1977 The- T3onorable -Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: . Subject: Certificates of Appreciation Certificates of Appreciation to former members of city commissions have been prepared for several commission members for presentation at the jurte 13, 1977 city council meeting. Former commission members to be presented such certificates are: William Sierners, former chairman of the Human Rights Commission, on which. he served two terms. Andrew Jensen,who served one term on the Senior/Handicapped Citizens Commission Carolyn Ring, former Charter Commission Member. Elizabeth Gutmann, former Cha rter Commission member. Respectfully submitted, .r-. / ~ '~s~ Lam" Wayne S . Burggraaff City Manager V1rSB/eja /,~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City.. Manager• Council Letter No. 205 Agenda June 13 , l y 7 7 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Application to Move House from 7021 Penn Avenue to 6508 19th Avenue On May 23, 1977, the council considered an application from Mr. Laurel C. Stein, to move a house from 7021 Penn Avenue to 6508 19th Avenue. At that time, the. council approved Mr. Stein's application with the stipulation that he receive concurrence of the neighbors immediately adjacent to the property on 19th Avenue. Mr. Stein has spoken with these neighbors and received concurrence of two out of the three immediately adjacent property owners. Attached to this council letter is a letter from Mr. Stein, i°equesting the opportuna.ty to appear before the council again at the June 27, 1977 meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~. ~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Acting Public Works Director June 23, 1977 Mr. Wayne Burggraaff City of Richfield fli;chfi.eld, Minne.sot.a Dear Mr, Burggraaff, ! hereby request to be on the next Counci0 agenda which 1 understand is meeting on June 28 In order that 1 may return with information on moving the house from 7021 Penn slue. So. to 6508 19th flue. South. ftt the last meeting the council approved the move but wanted me to get the adjoining property owners to sigh. The owner to the north and the owner to the rear of the property agreed but the one to the north did not want to .sign, The. one to the north asked the man to the one on the south to go in with him to purchase the lot and divide It but was_ not interested because it would make his taxes-too high. ! hope that you can approve this soon so that 1 am able to proceed with my p/ans, S! oerely, ~--__ ~~ ~~~~~- aurel C. Stein F CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council. Letter No. 190 Agenda June 13, 1977 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject; Request for City Reaction to Deeding of Land to City Attached is a letter from Oak Grove Lutheran Church concerning the possibility of deeding certain land now- o-r~ned by the church to the city. Mayor Law has asked that this matter be considered as an extra item at the June 13, .1977 city council meeting. The land referred to by the church in their letter consists of approximately 10, 666 square feet. It is in the form of a long narrow .triangle as shown on the attached sketch. Oak Grove Lutheran Church is considering the possibility of offering to deed this triangular piece of land to the City of Richfield. At the September 13, 1.976 city council meeting, the city council held an assessment hearing on the 1975 street improvements. At that meeting Oak Grove Lutheran Church asked that the assessment on this triangular piece of property either be reduced or deleted. The action of the city council was to sustain the special assessment in accordance with the city's assessment policy for street :improvements. A copy of the pertinent page .from the September 13, 1976 city council meeting minutes is attached. It ~is the concensus of the city staff that there is no practical city purpose for which this parcel of land could be used. The net effect" of accepting a deed for this land would b~ fQr the city to acquire another piece of property which would have.=to be_maintained at~he.citX.'.s_.expense, but be of no general benefit to the .city. It should be noted that it is. not possible for'the church to deed this property to the city unless the city is willing to accept such a transfer. Respectfully submitted, C~" I Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Planning Director Public Works Director Park and Recreation Director City Attorney W. 70th ST. 37.6 4 NI d W Q M N (T (D `~ ~~ W 7 ~ W J Q 0 Z J • i tom. _.~- _' - if ~\~ \\ ~~ > >,~ ~ 16 ,~~~ ~„~ ~ OAK GROVE- LUTHERAN CHURCH ~ 71ST AND LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH °a~ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 ~ PHONE 869-4917 .tune 1C, 1977 To The City Council of P,ichfield City of Richfield, t~iinnesota Cea r Counc i 1 tiembers Reference is made to the triangle of land between Augsburg and Lyndale Avenues immediately south of 71st Street. This parcel of land is identified as Plat 44925, Parcel ~}1G0, which is presently or~rned by Oak Grove Lutheran Church. This parcel of land serves no useful purpose for our needs. Actually it has more the characteristics of park property than that of residential property. lrle are presently considering the possibility of deeding this property to the city and solicit the reaction of the council to this proposal. ELY/k Sincerely, ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ Earl L. Youngren, Treasurer Oal: Grove Lutheran Church i Council rieeting Piinutes -2- September 13, 1976 Dean Nicholson, 415 6dest 74th Street, asked about the elimination of street lights on his street. The public works director indicated that this area would be included in the city wide street lighting on east-west streets. Piarvin [dolfenson of. the Century Court Apartments at 7437 Lyridale, protested his assessment because he felt he did not receive any benefit from the street im- provement, He also stated that the development had been prevented access from certain streets and some adjustment should be made because of it. The council considered Mr. Wolfenson's request and decided to .sustain the assessment policy but advised that if a different decision were made on another commercial property which is under investigation, they would agree to reconsider this assessment. Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Anderson that no adjustment be made on this assessment with the stipulation that this assessment may be reviewed further in light of the pending case from a previous hearing. All ayes - Carried, Earl Youngren, treasurer of Oak Grove Lutheran Church, requested relief from an assessment on a triangular-piece of property on Lyndale~Avenue owned by the chu r ch~. Luettinger Motion by. Ludeman , seconded by that no change be-made in this assessr:rent. All ayes - Carried. Motion by Anderson, seconded by Luettinger to close the hearing.. All ayes - Carried. Motion by Anderson, seconded by Jacobsen that the following resolution be adopted; that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of these minutes: '