07-11-77 agendaY
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 223
Extra Item
Agenda July 11, 1977
Subject: Repainting of Penn Avenue Water Tower -
Rejection of Bid
Pursuant to previous city council action, the city manager opened bids
on July 7, 1977 for repainting of the Penn Avenue water tower. The acting
public works director, environmental health director, and city clerk also
represented the city at the bid opening.
Only one bid was received for this item, from Schumann Bros. Inc.
in the amount of $60,000.
In an attempt to achieve a better competitive bid position, it is
recommended that the city council reject this bid and authorize the city
manager to rebid for the repainting of the Penn Avenue water tower.
Respectfully subm' ed ,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Finance Director
Acting Public Works Director
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR THE REPAINTING OF TIE
PENN AVENUE WATER TOWER
WHEREAS, pursuant to previous city council action, bids were
advertised for the repainting of the Penn Avenue Water Tower, and
WHEREAS, only one bid was received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. That in order to achieve a better competitive bid position
that the bid submitted by Schumann Bros. Inc. in the amount
of $60,000 with a November 14, 1977 completion date or
$63,000 with a June 1, 1978 completion date is hereby rejected.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 11th day
of July, 1977•
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Bid opening
July 7, 1977
Repainting Penn Water Tower
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Adminis-
trative staff was called by Wayne S. Burggraaff, City Manager, who announced
that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed
bids on Repainting Penn Water Tower, as advertised in the official newspaper
on June 22 and 29, 1977.
Present: Wayne S. Burggraaff, City Manager
Marshall Raaen, Acting Public Works Director
I. F. 'Roesler, Environmental Health Director
Ken Conway, Water Department Director
Arthur Bailey, Engineer
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
The following bid was submitted and read aloud:
BIDDER
BID. SECURITY
Schumann Bros, Inc.
5% Bid Bond
November 14, 1977 June 1, 1973
Completion Date Completion Date
$60,000
$63,000
The City Manager announced that the bid would be tabulated and considered at
the regular council meeting of July 11, 1977.
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
a
t�j
w
U)
0
O
1
tj
H
H
O
L4
H
O
Vi
(D
n
c+
c+
(D
a•
N•
C) td W bd 1-3
P, d R, 6
N•Ot:so
I C+- • C+-
(D Imo• P.
��0
C+- pj +
P. I-d .- O
o (D Ft
W
P.
C-1C ¢
ID
(D
P \O �
-J' C+
N (D
�p K
1-3
O
(D
pi
td
td
o
bd '
H
t7
trJ
bi
O
N•
P
N
td
F C
O
P,
O O
&
{
(~D
O
N Fi
O
tj N
0'
-="
O
ty
(D \.D
--J
y
O
H
C-?
td
0
d
-ffl,
Fd (D
ON
N
W
(D I
Cf-
O
P.
O
u 00
in
C+-
(D
C) td W bd 1-3
P, d R, 6
N•Ot:so
I C+- • C+-
(D Imo• P.
��0
C+- pj +
P. I-d .- O
o (D Ft
W
P.
C-1C ¢
ID
(D
P \O �
-J' C+
N (D
�p K
1-3
O
(D
pi
a CITY OF RICHFIL'LD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 222
Agenda July 11, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Second Reading: Request for Zoning District Change,
Special Use Permit and Off - Street Parking Contract,
826 West 66th Street
On June 13, 1977 the city council heard a request from Mr. John Hogenson
of Super American Stations, Inc. , St. Paul, Minnesota to change the zoning dis-
trict for a Super America station located at 826 West 660th Street from C -1
(neighborhood commercial district) to C -2 general commercial. (Council Letter
173, attached).
At the June 13, 1977 council meeting, the council took action to
approve the special use permit and off - street parking contract, contingent
upon implementation of the rezoning. The sp-acial use permit approval
included the following stipulations:
1. The applicant dedicate appropriate right -of -way for public
street purposes along 66th Street;
2. The applicant provide structural and landscape design plans in
conformance with the adopted L /H /N Urban Design Guidelines;
3. The applicant construct a 10 -foot wide walk along 66th Street.
(The L /H /N project will pay for five feet width of the walk).
The second reading on this zoning district change is scheduled for the
July 11, 1977 city council meeting. Upon completion of the required public
hearing, it is recommended that the city council approve the zoning district
change from C -1 neighborhood commercial to C -2 general commercial.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
1lctina Public Works D] ro( -for
a
Bill No. 1977 -14
AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX C, SECTIONS
2 AND 3 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Appendix C, Section 2 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota defining neighborhood business districts of the city, under
Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.28, Subdivision 2 of such code is
hereby amended in the following respects:
Paragraph (4) is amended to read
11(4) That part of the north (south] one -half of Section 28, Township 28,
Range 24 lying north of 66th Street, between Graham Avenue extended and
a line running parallel with the easterly line of said Suction, distant
410 feet westerly of said easterly line except that parcel described in
-Appendix C, Section 3, Paragraph (74)."
Appendix C, Section 3 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota defining general commercial districts of the city, under
Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.28, Subdivision 2 of such code is
hereby amended in the following respect:
The following paragraph shall be added at the end of said Section 3:
11(74) Commencing at a point on the Westerly boundary line of Tract E,
Registered Land Survey No. 642, which point is 201 feet Southerly from
the Northwest corner of said Tract E, thence Easterly at right angles
to said Westerly boundary line of said Tract E to a point on the Easter
boundary line of said Tract E, thence Southerly along the Easterly
boundary line of said Tract E to the Northeasterly corner of Tract C,
thence Southerly alonRthe Easterly boundary lane of said Tract C to
the Southeasterly corner thereof, thence Westerly along the Southerly
boundary line of said Tract C to the Southwesterly corner thereof,
thence Westerly along the Southerly boundary line of said Tract E to'
the Southwesterly corner thereof; thence Northerly along the Westerly'
boundary line said Tract E to the place of beginning, being a portion
of said Tract E and all of said Tract C, subject to an easement for
street purposes (826 West 66th Street)"
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,Minnesota this
11th day of July, 1977.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
CITY OF RICIIFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 173
Agenda June 13, 1977
Subject: Request for Zoning District Change and Special Use
Permit - 826 West 66th Street - Super America Station
and Off - Street Parking Contract
Mr. John Hogenson of Super America Stations, Inc. , St. Paul, Minnesota
has requested a zoning district change from C -1 neighborhood commercial to C -2
general commercial for the Super America station located at 826 West 66th Street.
This application also includes a request for special use permit.
out:
The following items are attached to this letter and will be referred to through-
1 . Exhibit A - current zoning
2. Exhibit B - current land use
3. Exhibit C - site plan
4. Exhibit D - map showing petition of signers
5. Exhibit E - L /H /N Redevelopment Plan
6. Exhibit F - Off - street parking site plan
Background
The existing gas station is a non - conforming use. When a use is non - conforming,
the use cannot be enlarged, extended, reconstructed, substituted or structurally altered.
Gas stations are allowed in the C -2 general commercial district with a special use
permit.
This non - conforming gas station use is requesting the zone change in order to
permit construction of a gas pump island canopy and other improvements.
Site Data
Zone /Land Use: C -1 Neighborhood Commercial /Gas Station /Service Station Store
Location: The site is located on the northeast corner of the intersection
Council. Letter No. 173 -2- Tune 13, 1977
of 66th Street and Rae Drive, within the T /H /N
Redevelopment Project area.
Surrounding Zoning:
North - C -1
East - C -1
West -R
South - R and C -2
Surrounding Land Use:
North - U.C. Post Office
East - Restaurant
West - Single Family Residential
South - Single Family Residential and Gas Station
Site Improvements:
The following modifications related to the construction of a
gas pump island canopy are prop &sed (Exhibit C):
1. Relocate existing gas pump islands and tanks
2. Relocate existing barrier curb on north property line
and provide for additional wf-- street parking
3. Close south curb cut on Rae Drive and provide for
additional parking areas
4. Construct pump island canopy
Staff Review and Findings
Zoning
The property occupied by the Super America Station, the post office and the
restaurant are zoned for neighborhood commercial use. The remainder of the
surrounding commercial area is zoned C -2 general commercial use.
The commercial uses which have developed in this C -1 zone are by reason of
service or commodity offered, traffic generation, and business hours, businesses
which typically locate in higher intensity commercial zones. The C -1 zone should
not be used as a buffer or transition zone between more intense commercial zones
and single family zones. Neighborhood (C -1) commercial zones were developed
to provide for a limited amount of convenience goods and services within or adjacent
to residential neighborhoods. When a C -1 zone is located next to a more intense
commercial zone, the tendency is for typical, general commercial uses to locate in
the C -1 zone. This is what happened in this case.
:however, after the the use located in the C -1 zone, the zoning ordinance
was changed to allow gds stations only in C -2 general commercial zones. The C -2
is appropriate zoning for gas stations. Thus, the Super America Station is a non-
conforming use and cannot be expanded without a zoning district change.
�_UUJIUII LULLUi 1NU. i 1 -1 - � -^• --
L /Il /N Pl -an
Certain goals of the L /H %N Redevelopment project address the need to tie
together or unify the commercial area. These goals are as fol.l.ows:
I. Facilitate the consolidation of commercial. uses along Lyndale
Avenue.
2. Increase the intensity of use within the L /H /N area
3. Develop a design framework for building renovation so that a
unified image begins to emerge.
4. Develop a unified design theme for the L /H /N.
Comprehensive Plan L /H /N Redevelopment Plan
The city's comprehensive plan considers this property as a part of the Central
Business District, and appropriate for mixed land use of a medium to high density.
The redevelopment plan indicates that the use should be for a gas s.tation.
Relationship to Plans
This project is within the L /H /N redevelopment project area and is, in fact, the
first business at the major entrance to the L /H /N area. The dev�:lopment is subject
to the HRA's adopted L /li /N Urban Design Standards. These standards require the
structures to be in earth tones and the I.ight standards and illuminaires be a type
similar to those being used in the public right -of -way. Landscaping which conforms
to the Urban Design Standards will be completed in all areas not used for parking.
The sidewalk treatment will be done in conformance with L /H /N standards.
Street improvement plans for 66th Street between Graham Avenue and I35W have
been developed to alleviate the hazardous traffic situa tion which exists on this
section of road, and to address concerns raised by a number of residents in the area.
This section of 66th Street has the second highest number of accidents in Richfield.
The preliminary plans which have been developed by Hennepin County, in cooper-
ation with city staff. and BRVd, include reducing the severity of the curves along
this stretch of 66th Street to prevent weaving accidents. The plans also call for
installation of medians and turning lanes. A traffic signal is planned for Lakeshore
Drive and 66th Street, and sidewalks will be provided along 66th Street. Hennepin
County is requesting, with city staff concurrence, a 20 -foot easement over the
property adjacent to 66th Street for these future street improvements. The right -of-
way easement which should be dedicated by-Super America is similar to the right -of-
way being dedicated by the Woodlake School site developer.
Recommendation
It is the opinion of the staff that the proposed zone change is consistent with
the L /II /N redevelopment plan and the comprehensive plan. The rezoning would aid
Council Letter No. 174 -4- June 13, 1977
in tying the commercial area together in terms of zoning and land use. The
proposed project will conform to the L /H /N Design Guidelines.
Therefore, it is my recommendation, in which the planning director concurs,
that the request to rezone the subject property from C -1 to C -2 be granted, provided
Super America Stations, Inc. dedicate the requested right -of. -way easement along
'66th Street, and conforms to the adopted Urban Design Guidelines for the L /II /N
area.
The-changes being proposed by the applicant improve both internal and adjacent
vehicle circulation by changing the curb cut on Rae Drive from 60° to 900 . Closing
the south curb cut on Rae Drive, and providing sidewalk and dedicated land for
street improvements, while providing structural improvements and landscaping
improvements to the site, brings the applicatbn into substantial conformance with
the required special use permit criteria for a gas station in a C -2 district. However,
the site is adjacent to a residential zoning district (a criteria for not issuing a special
use permit) . However, given the special circumstances that the station curre'Itly
exists at this site, that it is the beginning of the L /H /N commercial area, and that
the station conforms to both the L /H /N redevelopment plan and the comprehensive
plan, it is recommended that the council approve the special use permit subject to
the following stipulations:
1. The applicant dedicate appropriate easements for public street purpose
along 66th Street.
2. The applicant provide structural and landscape design plans in conformance
with the adopted L /H /N Urban Design Guidelines
3. The applicant construct a 10 -foot wide walk along 66th Street. The L /H /N
project will pay for five feet width of the walk.
4. The compressers be baffled to reduce the noise to State noise maximums which
are: 7 :00 a, m. - 10 :00 P.m. L50 -60dba - L10- 05dba; 10 :00 p.m. - 7 :00 a.m.
- L50- 50dba; L10- 55dba.
5. Completion of Off - Street Parking Contract
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission heard this request for rezoning and special use
permit at its regular meeting of May 24, 1977. Three nearby property owners
testified at the meeting; one was in favor because he felt Super America ran a good
business; and the other two were in opposition because of noise from the existing
compressors, and debris blowing into their yards.
The planning commission voted unanimously to recommend to the city council
rezoning of the subject property from C -1 to C -2, provided that Super America
Council Letter No. 174 -5- June 13, 1 977
Stations, Inc, dedicate the requested 20 -foot right -of -way along 66th Street
and comply 'with the adopted Urban Design Guidelines for the L /H /N area.
The planning commission also unanimously recommended to the city council
issuance of the special. use permit with the following stipulations;
1. The applicant dedicate appropriate right -of -way for public street
purpose along 66th Street.
2. The applicant provide structural and landscape design plans in
conformance with the adopted L /H /N Urban Design Guidelines.
3. The applicant construct a 10 -foot wide, walk along 66th Street. The
L /H /N project will pay for five feet width of the walk.
Therefore, it is recommended that the council take the following actions;
1. Approve the zoning- district changes from C-1, neighborhood commercial
to C -2 general commercial.
2. Approve the special use permit to allow operation of a gas station in a
C -2 zone.
3. Approve the off - street parking Contract.
Off- Street Parking Contract
Mr. rlogenson has also requested approval of an off - street parking contract.
This off- street parking contract establishes performance standards for driveway
and parking area modifications proposed as part of this request for a rezoning and
special use permit.
The parking standards indicate a need for five parking spaces to accomodate
employees and customers. This requirement is based on the ratio of five spaces
per 1,000 square feet of floor area. The applicant proposes to develop 15 parking
spaces, as shown on Exhibit P. Additionally, new concrete barrier curbs will be
constructed where indicated and landscaping is in conformance with the eequire-
ments of the L /II /N Urban Design Guidelines.
The staff has reviewed the off- street parking application and recommends
council approval, subject to approval of the zoning district change and special use
permit.
Res ectfully suhn)itted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
cc. Public works Director
Planning Director
. . .........
U)c d
GENERAL CONAMERCIAL
[MULTIPLE RE SIDE NCI
L�ejl GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
LIMITED BUSINESS
3/
N! 0 IS u -D 1v`q J
Ll LEI
P.,
r—AZ
Kv,
to
f
CM,
__ _.•� i�_., ��� .LIOZ 1 �l�T I9: 'i, �" ��Sik_` N U \
-1
Ij V-1
tivvi vn
vT-7777T—v_c_
A/0 1 3.1
s
/ r
b° '--
�� 1
50 � I
0
I 1
PPOPpSED
,, r 10 t CANOPY
�d
�Ell
Cs ! •J
Propose Casement . .
lG-
°- "E ---
W. 66th
— — — — Indicates new barrier curb
N
Scale: 1"=50'
s
tt"
�1
/ r
b° '--
�� 1
50 � I
0
I 1
PPOPpSED
,, r 10 t CANOPY
�d
�Ell
Cs ! •J
Propose Casement . .
lG-
°- "E ---
W. 66th
— — — — Indicates new barrier curb
N
Scale: 1"=50'
to
\' 1l•C
5-, A C. I
._ /rye t�.J',t\r \'' '� � jl -/i `j � \ t y 1 � ^� / �i^ L1— �� - --
P,-
6
x X
k �g -/ � 71 Z•o j n • �- ,�.., ,� �r C: c i.�? \ .I,t C CL: mac,, -' - # �, .' E ' .a
REZU'\lUllic
SIG [E-,--� S
N 0 N G NI E- P% S
0-1
F-I
, - ""i
in
CO r
73
O-W
13
.............
. ............ = ----- -
Ll
fl2l
F, •9
1.
k
4t/
4
/g r
be 5
C r
� � t
o
o �
PROPOSED I
CANOPY 10
U -.I
�- Proposed Easement 01
Line
r
4/ O
W.
- + Indicates new barrier curb
OWNER AND ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
22.0
66th Si.
USE:
DATE OF APPLICATION:
PLANNING COMMISSION:
COUNCIL ACTION:
NO. PARKING SPACES:
f}N '
f Q
1'
OFF- STREET PARKING NO. 77--3
I
Scale: I"= 50'
Super America, P. 0. Box 248, St. Paul Park, Minn.
826 West 66th Street
Plat 46125, Parcel 4510
Gasoline Service Station _ Service Station Store
June 8, 1977
May 24, 1977
June 13, 1977
12
E. .S
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 221
Agenda July 11, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Discussion of Possible Ordinance Amendment
Councilman Luettinger has requested that there be an item scheduled
for the July 11, 1977 City Council meeting to discuss the possibility of
adopting a city ordinance amendment to provide for licensing of building
contractors .
Respectfully submitted,
S.
I
Wayne S. Burggraaff Iry
City Manager
WSB /jkl
cc: Acting Public Works Director
viVim"
s
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 220
Agenda July 11 , 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Public Hearing for Change in the L /H /N Project Boundaries
The Hennepin County property description division has requested the city
to amend the L /H /N project area boundaries to include the total parcel of
property in Richfield Lake which was purchased by the city from the Rutman's
on September 27, 1976.
The inclusion of this property, which is partially located within the project
boundaries, will not have an effect on the financing of the tax increment district
because the property is tax exempt and has an intended park use purpose.
This change is simply an administrative change to simplify the recordkeeping
of both the HRA and the County. The attached map shows the area now outside
the project boundary which is proposed to be included.
It is the recommendation of the staff that the council approve this change
in the L /H /N boundaries after holding a public, hearing.
Respectfully submi ted,
60'
Wayne. S. Bur g g raaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
i -35W -
_. - --
I ;
EMERSON AVE
P _ �
t 111_ /t 4
LYNWOOD PI .A� ` DUPONT IAVE
Aw
COLEA% AVE. - -
_ BRYANT AVE. AY
ALDgICN AVE,.
L - - - -�� -��� • m c. i jP .WAi
GARMID AVE I '
a --'r MAflfl1ET AVE.
m i 1 1 f 1 I i I T rEa�i '
a/nw4mE/mnmU • ^N -- _ -' J _ _ —:. J
LI
1_,_
o
i f l 1 _I�
F I BRAND AVE.
E
L_ —_ __L_� 1 �I
- L t -� -
PLEASANT AVE.
-
PILLSBURY AVE I
I
m AJ �
_ Ap WENTWORTH
r
r p I7 v % I II lit
U) � I� II ( 1
Mmp I --1- _- L- ._�---1 -.� Lij _�._1_ —_�.1J LI i
pT B AVE.
jar NJ-�
-� —I
{
1 — i -
NICOLLET AVE.
l
1 I c zdw i N p0 r,- - -- \
jnEmee. .'yl.J
ImI1Vaf I
I
l i i
wu/}tketnfiaeeaiiemeemfe�l31
esteem: - -t
l
El
STEVENS A ! VE. _1 I _
D
Z.,1 AVE.
c: r kb 3 f.affi9�
` /�/ I ( rs -seal t< L 6i� V.�. F ?:-�tf�
I"rec ,:M _M� P140,Liv- i - - RICHFIELI-1, FAN! !
1' o
A
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 219
Agenda July 11, 1977
Subject: Request for Variance - 7644 Colfax Avenue
Mr. Leary, 7644 Colfax Avenue, has requested a variance to the ordinance
which establishes the sideyard building setback line. Mr. Leary. would like to
construct an addition to an existing attached garage.
Background
Parcel Size: 66.3x130' (8,619 square feet)
Existing Setback: 15.8 feet
Proposed Setback: 5.8 feet
This property is a corner lot on the northwest corner of Colfax Avenue and West
77th Street. The variance is requested for the sideyard to West 77th Street.
The applicant intends to expand an existing single -car garage into a two -car
garage.
The sideyard setback from the street for a corner lot is required by ordinance
to be the same distance as the front yard setback. When a dwelling has been
constructed less than this distance from the sideyard lot line, the side of the
dwelling most near to the street then becomes the established building setback
line. Thus, any structure which extends beyond the side of the existing dwelling
requires a variance.
Zoning Requirements
A request for a variance must be judged in accordance with the conditions
set forth in Section 3.41, subdivision 6 of the city code. The city council
should grant the variance only if all conditions necessary for granting a variance
are present on the property.
Staff Review
The staff has reviewed this request against the conditions which must be
present for granting a variance, and finds the following:
Council Letter No. 219 -2- July 11, 1977
j J
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting
the particular land, building or use referred to in the application
not common to other properties in this or similar districts.
It is the opinion of the staff that there are no special circumstances or
conditions affecting this property not common to other properties in this district.
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
It is the opinion of the staff that the variance is not necessary for pre-
servation of substantial property rights. Denial of the variance does not
preclude the applicant from using his property as a single family residence.
3. That the granting of the application will not materially and
adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant and will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property
or improvements in the neighborhood.
It is the opinion of the staff that the variance could materially and adversely
affect the health or safety of persons residing or working the neighborhood.
Seventy - seventh Street provides a transportation area between single family
homes and commercial property. A special use permit for a restaurant with
liquor was denied to a property owner south of 77th Street due to traffic problems
in adjacent streets - Colfax Avenue and 77th Street. The major issue in a second
restaurant controversy was traffic and land use and, as such, this immediate area
needs careful neighborhood planning. Reducing sideyards, especially on 77th
Street, may reduce the options available to both property owners and city, and
may increase the cost of improving the entire area. Seventy- seventh Street is a
major service street for the businesses and could be a major connector for devel-
opment of the property at 77th Street and I35W.
Staff Recommendation
It is the opinion of the staff that since all three conditions are not present
on this property, the variance request should be denied.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission reviewed this request at their regular meeting of
June 28, 1977._ The applicant and two nearby residents appeared before the
planning commission, although the two residents expressed no objections to
the variance. The commission discussed at length the reasons for maintaining
a side street sideyard setback. The staff indicated that the reasons were to keep
houses from being built right up to the sidewalks and streets, thus providing
clear areas with good visibility, and minimizing accident causing conditions.
Council Letter Igo. 219 -3- July 11, 1977
Another reason for maintaining the setback is to provide room for street
widening while preventing the necessity for public purchase of easements.
The planning commission voted 4 -3 to recommend that the city council
grant the variance at 7644 Colfax Avenue, to construct an addition to an
existing garage.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaf
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
mm
C'+
20
EMERSON
7 1'.3
. 7"
7701
U) 760
L41,
K'!30,
[,A- D'.
, . �'
Nv Is
w 4 12
vn
F\)- 1--5 1
z
- �--74
i
77
IN,
(P
I i
4-
tJ
09
760-
T-
co
0 T/R�T�
1)�fZtlr A D D-
1! 7-7
/644 3d 3 26 20 oll "c-o-1
DUPONT
IrL,4' 1 -39 7 T---'
2; : -- -1
09
.0
t6 i' 2G J ?o
WULF.AX- I
�L 0; V(� D D
- Li
4.
BRYANT
,645 39 3 L 15 760:
m
'T ADD
'E-L�mvau
15��fs
t At.�� A!
14 3f,
ALDRICH
/64!,
5
U) 760
L41,
K'!30,
[,A- D'.
, . �'
Nv Is
w 4 12
F\)- 1--5 1
z
i
77
IN,
(P
I i
4-
tJ
09
760-
T-
co
0 T/R�T�
1)�fZtlr A D D-
1! 7-7
/644 3d 3 26 20 oll "c-o-1
DUPONT
IrL,4' 1 -39 7 T---'
2; : -- -1
09
.0
t6 i' 2G J ?o
WULF.AX- I
�L 0; V(� D D
- Li
4.
BRYANT
,645 39 3 L 15 760:
m
'T ADD
'E-L�mvau
15��fs
t At.�� A!
14 3f,
ALDRICH
/64!,
5
U) 760
L41,
K'!30,
[,A- D'.
, . �'
Nv Is
w 4 12
F\)- 1--5 1
z
ul
L41,
K'!30,
[,A- D'.
, . �'
w 4 12
134.54
.n
Dwel li
764'
in
co .
Attached
Garage
Exist. Bldg. Line•-,6
Proposed
Garage
Addition
aS
tiX� 161 4 E
C
W. 77th ST.
O
U)
Q .
X
L
J
O
U
Scale, I °= 20'
ft
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 218
Agenda July 11, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for a Special Use Permit for a Public Garage
at 7724 Harriet Avenue
Mr. Jim Whitesell, property owner, and Mr. Michael O'Connell and Mr.
Larry Kornmann, tenants, have requested a special use permit to allow them
to operate a public garage for an automotive transmission and general motor
repair and overhaul business.
The following items are attached to this council letter and will be referred
to throughout:
Exhibit A - current zoning of the site and surrounding property
Exhibit B - current land use in the area
Exhibit C - site plan
Exhibit D - zoning ordinance regulations relating to public
garages
Exhibit E - applicant's description of proposed business
Zoning Requirements
Richfield Ordinance, Section 3.33, subdivision 2, requires a special
use permit for the operation of a public garage in an "I" Industrial zoned district.
This request for a special use permit should be judged by the standards established
for public garages in Section 3.33, subdivision 3 of the zoning ordinance. (Exhibit
D) .
Background
Lot Size: 44'x134' - 5,896 square feet
Building Size: 1,913 square feet (no building expansion
proposed)
Zoning: "I" Industrial
Council Letter No. 218
Surrounding Zoning:
-2-
N - Industrial
E - Industrial
W - Industrial
S - Industrial
Present Land Use: Vacant
July 11, 1977
Surrounding Lane Use: N - Crown Aluminum Products
E - Astleford Equipment (truck parking)
W - Fireside Office Supply
S - Fireside Office Supply
This building was constructed in 1963 as a bodyshop, but was never used as
a bodyshop. The building has been used infrequently for the last few years, and
the building and the surrounding property are in a somewhat deteriorated condition.
The applicants propose to improve the appearance of the brick building by painting
it and upgrade the surrounding property by removing scrub trees and weeds and
repairing the parking area. At' the present time there are two overhead
doors - across the front of the building on either side of the main , arage
The
applicants propose to permanently close the north overhead door.
The comprehensive plan indicates that this area is best suited for mixed
land use, high density. This use would not be in conformance with the compre-
hensive plan.
Staff Review and Findings
The staff has reviewed the application in accordance with Section 3.33,
subdivision 3 and finds the following:
I. The land does not abut an "R" residential district
2. The use will not create undue traffic hazards or congestion
3. The site is not at a street intersection
4. It will be necessary for the applicant to execute an amendment to
the existing off - street parking agreement (the existing agreement
indicates five parking spaces). The amendment would require
additional parking spaces, improvement of the existing parking area
and landscaping of the boulevard. The ordinance requires eight
parking spaces (three for each service bay and one for each employee).
The site -can accomodate seven parking spaces.
Staff Recommendation
It is the opinion of the staff that the project as proposed is in substantial
compliance with the standards for a public garage. The staff recommends the
Council Letter No. 218 -2- July 11, 1977
issuance of a special use permit for a public garage.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission reviewed this request for a special use permit at
their their regular meeting of June 28, 1977. The applicant and tenants were
present at the hearing. The planning commission voted 7 -0 to recommend to the
city council that the request for a special use permit for a public garage at 7724
Harriet Avenue be granted and the special use permit issued since the proposal
is in substantial compliance with the standards for a public garage.
Respectfully submitted,
R)hc � . Wayne S. Burggraaff 4
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
fr
Ltl
lQ- 4 -1- 14 {*Z 4 u 4;N - ---
J H "Y H op
..........
Ld
C)
W-
Lij Lli
W
0 Lli
C) Of
I
Lij
<
x
Qo
:-?-;
<1
LA
U)
:D z
0 U)
:D
m
Lli
WA
k
V G A I
rt
LJ
' 1 I
. m
LO
In
to
:F ,, so
t -6A N
mine-)
-4- ..4.._
0»[ 60
L _1 l_�
J80 N
Bp bl I 2 ( 92 I a � 1, OJc
DID D
1t ti I
lul
.�t.
104! i C., c- 1
ONVd Jg
vl I OZ 97 I i� 041,E 1
OC91` r0
.vast
n D ; D '--
N i M - V
IUL
- N M v to J
' p 0) 1 P r
11 Y
Cl-1 1�M�1CJ' T-!
0.
El
� � CV M d x•41 ►�- N
k I Vii_ _- _.t —ti.si �•� ' LLi
J �4
it
i !
i
d I
I � i
J
1
0
m
134'3" .
Close— 11!
up this
Service
Bay Rebuilding door overhead a 9 Q
Area .�
_ - 7724
� M FCOnt
Entrance (bJ
Service
g' Bay Overhead
Door
Q
48'
.N
Scale: 1=
for storage,' loa ding, unloading or similar activities.
3.33. USE P.EGULATTows nm "C -2'` GIRIEP..AL COITIERCIL, DISTRICT.
Subdivisioaz 1.~ Permitted Uses. In a General Commercial district, unless otherwise
provided in this chapter, the following uses are permitted:
(1) Any use permitted in'an " " district or an "MR" district upon compliance
with the procedural requirements for such district provided that no one- family,
two- family or multiple - family dwelling shall be, constructed in this district without
first- obtaining a special use permit therefor in accordance with provisions of
Section 3.41.
(2) Any commercial use permitted in a "C -1" district, subject to the procedural
rec :uiroments contained in this section.
(3) Retail stores and shops, including soda fountains.
(4) Financial institutions, telephone and telegraph offices, messenger offices
and professional offices.
(5) Carpenter, furniture repairing and upholstery shops, book binding shops,
dress mating shops, shop repairing
or dyeing shops, newspaper and job printing
esta5lishments, electrical, tinsmithing, plumbing, decorating shops, self service
laundries and outdoor advertising signs.
16) Tree trimming services provided that such services do not include storage
accumulation or keeping ol- wood or tree trimmings on the premises.
(7) Accessory uses and structures incidental to any permitted use, but not
including the open -forage of equipment or materials.
Subd.•2. Uses by Special Use Permit. The follo�iing uses shall be permitted only
upon the procurement of a special use permit pursuant to Section 3.41:
(1) Undertal.ing establishments.
(2) Any drive -in business where people are served in automobiles.
(3). Automobile camps and courts.
(4) Hotels, motels, restaurants, cafes, gasoline service stations, service
station stores, public garages, car sales lots, and theaters. No service station
may be converted into a station store without a special use permit for such use
issued in accordance with Section 3.41 of this code. (1973 -21). 2- 11 -74.
(5) Other business uses which are determined by the Council to be of the
same general character as the uses enumerated in this section and which will not
be obnoxious or detrimental to the area in which they would be located.
I Subd. 3. Regulations Relating to Gasoline Service Stations, Public Garages and Car
Sales Lots. A special use permit for a gasoline service station, a public garage or
a.car sales lot shall not be granted unless the council finds that the proposed use
will be in substantial compliance with the following standards:
-(a) The use site will not abut a lot which is in an "R" district.
For the purposes of this paragraph, a lot which merely adjoins the use site at one
corner will not be deemed to abut the site.
(b) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion by
reason of the turning movements which vehicles would make in entering or leaving the
site.
(c) No drive-uay, at the point it crosses the property line of the site will be
within 40 feet of an intersection. An "intersection" as used in this paragraph means
the point of intersection of the extended curb lines if the curbs on the near side of
the site, and measurement shall be along such extended curb lines.
2 -11 -74
(d) The station or garage will not display any banners, noisy ribbons
or similar attention-distracting or visibility- obscuring devices in the
area in front of building setback lines.
(e) The minimum frontage on any street will.be 120 feet and the
minimum area of the site will be 12,000 square feet for a s.tation with lour
pumps or less; and stations with more pumps will have sufficient additional
frontage area to provide equivalent- and sufficient space for servicing
vehicles, for off:- street parking, for safe vehicular approaches into the
station, and for good visibility for pedestrians and drivers.
(f) No driveway will be flared outward on the boulevard in such a
way as to encroach upon the boulevard of adjacent property.
_(g') The station or garage will comply with the off - street parking,
sign construction and other regulations of the city.
(h) Any required buffer or screening area will be so constructed as
to obstruct headlight beams of automobiles on the station property from
beaming onto adjacent residential property.
(i) Pump islands will not be so close to street or adjacent property
lines'as to create the likelihood of encroachment by vehicles upon street
right -of- tray, sidewalk areas or adjacent property.
(j) Only one permanent detached ground display sign, pddestal type may
be erected on the street frontage at or near the property line adjacent
to the street, except that if the frontage oh the'sbyeet.is in.exceas-of
150 feet, two such signs may be allowed by the council on such frontage,
subject to any other applicable sign regulation.
Q1'). All exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated
as not to be a nuisance :o adjacent properties.
.(l) If the station or garage is to be located in a shopping center or
other integrated development, it will be in architectural harmony with the
rest of the center or development.
(m) The station or garage will not provide for the outdoor operation
of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor
display of merchandise; but the outside underground storage of gasoline
and other petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary displ- ayof -- --
merchandise within 4 feet of the station building is permitted.
(n) If the station or garage is not to be located on a county. road or
state highway, it shall not be operated between the hours of 11:00 p,m.
and 6:00 a.m. of the following day.
(o,) If the site is at an intersection, provision will be made for an
unobstructed area on the site, adjacent to and within 50 feet of the inter-
section, free of vehicles, signs (other than a pedestal sign), displays
or other materials which tend to obstruct intersection visibility.
Subd. 4. Regulations Re,at:Lng to Hotels, Motels, Restaurants and Cafes.
A special use-permit shall not be granted for a hotel, motel, restaurant
or cafe unless the council finds that the proposed use will be in substantial
compliance with the following standards:
(a) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion
either on the public streets adjacent to the site or on the parking areas
on or adjacent to the site or on streets adjacent to the site unto which
traffic to or from the site is channeled.
(b) Adequate provision will be made, through the use of building set-
backs, buffer areas, screening, and exterior treatment or placement of the,
building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust, and any other
sources of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent properties.
V • 3/23/70
2..
June 13, 1977
Building inspection Department
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Richfield, Minnesota
Gentlemen.`
We are submitting this letter in response to your request
for a formal letter of intent concerning our proposed plans
for use of the property located at 7724 our
Avenue bouth,
Richfield, minnesota.
i•he intention of our bujiness at this address, is to operate
under the name of Kornell Automotive, offering complete
mechanical repair on cars and light trucks. Vie intend to
have two vehicles in the building plus a rebuilding area,
with parking facilities for eight vehicles outside the
building.
Sincerely yours,
Gtr
r
Larry Ko�nmann
12�c�,�
Michael O'Connell
W,
H14
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 217
Agenda July 11 , 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Variance - 6245 13th Avenue
Mr. Brian Kispert, 6245 13th Avenue, has requested a variance to the
ordinance which establishes the sideyard building setback line. Mr. Kispert
proposes to construct an addition to an existing attached garage.
Ba ckground
Parcel Size: 75' x 135.12' (10,134 square feet)
Existing Setback: 13 feet
Proposed Set -
Back 4 feet, 6 inches
This property is a corner lot on the northeast corner of 13th Avenue and 63rd
Street. The variance requested is for the 63rd Street sideyard. The sideyard
setback from the street for a corner lot is required by ordinance to be the same
distance as the front yard setback. When a dwelling has been constructed less
than this distance from the sideyard lot line, the side of the dwelling most near
to the street then becomes the established building setback line. Thus, any
structure which extends beyond the side of the existing dwelling requires a
variance.
Zoning Requirement
A request for a variance must be judged in accordance with the conditions
set forth in Section 3.41, subdivision 6 of the city code. The city council should
grant the variance only if all conditions necessary for granting a variance are
present on the property.
Staff Review
The staff has reviewed this proposal against the conditions which must be
present for granting a variance, and finds the following:
Council Letter No. 217 -2- Agenda July 11, 1977
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the
particular land building or use referred to in the application,
not common to other properties in this or similar districts.
It is the opinion of the staff that there are no special circumstances or
conditions affecting this property or building not common to other properties in
this district. The average lot dimension in the area is 75' x .134' . Of the three
remaining corner lots at the intersection of 13th Avenue and 63rd Street, two
homes have detached garages in the rear yard with drives from 63rd Street.
The remaining home does not have a garage.
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
It is the opinion of the staff that the variance is not necessary for the
preservation of property rights. Denial of the variance does not preclude the
applicant from using his property for single family residential use.
3. That the granting of the application will not materially and adversely
affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property of the applicant and will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improve-
ments in the neighborhood.
It is the opinion of the staff that the variance would not materially or
adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing in the neighborhood.
Staff Recommendation
It is the opinion of staff that all three conditions necessary for granting a
variance are not present and, therefore, the request for variance should be denied.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission heard this request for a variance at their regular
meeting of June 2B, 1977. The applicant appeared before the planning commission
as,well as two area residents and the builder for the applicant. All four parties
spoke in favor of the request. The planning commission voted 4 -3 to recommend
to the city council granting of the sideyard variance at 6245 13th Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
AVE.
02 630
01
CD
--4 Un t UD) W Ln -0.
1 iLn
2u
�W� -141113-(4 L pn;
52,
/7
545
A AD
N
co
co -4 ! 07 CUD
rho --4
F
-344 _L 39 3 2
26 20 14 03
AVE.
.0 1 37 ' 33
N GI
AVE.
T- -3
L L
2 0 1
C:
W
0- CD
6245 4. 3T , , 2, �217 It �Flvl
[] Li 7
cj
Fo
PA RKV
AVE. r,2 45 59 3 21 1
4.5 1 2 17 .15 11 05 <"
El Lj 010
11, Fji tL- A
(D
Flo
OD tc 0,
7-4
IPA --j
LL4 4 34 20 24 20 14 !0 4 6:A 6244
AV L. v E
27 21
—FITT T----)]
F o 0 ]1
A
"A
Trl
Y,
IT-
GO
w 6245
Residence
N
r`
m _ Breeze
� f
Porch
Existing Scale 1 "= 20`
n> Garage
CO Proposed
Cr)_Garage Addition
0 Inside of curb)
E. 63rd ST.
r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 21.6
Agenda July 11, 1977
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Schedule of
Fees and Charges
Late last year, and early this year, the city council approved a revision in
the schedule of fees for various city services performed by the plan -dr.g and
public works departments. Copies of the council letters explaining those
changes are attached.
More recently, the council approved an increase in the charges for sauna
and masseuse licensure. All of these changes must be reflected in the city
ordinance and, accordingly, the city attorney has drafted an ordinance amend- -
inent incorporating the schedules of fees and charges for various city services.
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. This amendment
provides for three basic changes:
1. Establishes an appendix to the city code which lists all fees
and charges by section of the ordinance and topic;
2. Incorporates all changes in fees and charges approved by previous
city council action;
3. Amends all sections of the ordinance which include a schedule
of fees and charges to cross reference Appendix D.
This amendment consolidates in a single schedule all city fees and charges,
making the various charges easier to identify and the entire ordinance code
P uouncii. Letter 1vo. Z1b -Z- July 11, 1977
.4
easier to use. It is recommended that the council give first reading approval
to this ordinance amendment at their July 11, 1977 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
wpitc � - B
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: City Attorney
Acting Public Director
Planning & Redevelopment Director
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE AND AMENDING CHAPTER
III, PART I, SECTIONS 3.04, 3.05, 3.06, 3.09; CHAPTER III, PART II, SECTION 3.16;
CHAPTER III, PART IV, SECTIONS 3.34A, 3.40, 3.41, 3.42; CHAPTER III, PART V, SECTION
3.47; CHAPTER III, PART VI, SECTION 3.54; CHAPTER IV, SECTIONS 4.02, 4.03, 4.04,
4.05, 4.07; CHAPTER V, PART I, SECTIONS 5.08, 5.09, 5.12; CHAPTER V, PART II, SECTIONS
5.17, 5.18, 5.19, 5.20, 5.21, 5.22, 5.23, 5.24. 5.25, 5.26; CHAPTER V, PART III,
SECTIONS 5.27, 5.28, 5.29, 5.30; CHAPTER V. PART IV, SECTIONS 5.34, 5.35; CHAPTER VI,
SECTIONS 6.01, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.07, 6.08, 6.11, 6.12, 6.13, 6.14, 6.15, 6.16,
6.17, 6.18, 6.19, 6.20, 6.21, 6.22, 6.23; CHAPTER VIII, PART I, SECTION 8.03; CHAPTER
X, PART II, SECTIONS 10.05, 10.06; CHAPTER XI, SECTIONS 11.02, 11.03, 11.06, 11.07
AND CHAPTER XII, PART 1, SECTION 12.04 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
I. Appendix D to the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield establishing license,
permit and miscellaneous fees and charges is hereby enacted to read as follows:
"APPENDIX D"
LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES
Section 1. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinance in-
cluding codes and ordinances adopted by reference in this code shall be as contained
in the following sections. The following table cross references the ordinance code
section and subdivision to the Appendix D section and number:
Ordinance Code
Appendix D
Section
Subdivision
Section Number
3.04
4
2
11, 12
3.04
6 (2)
3
5
3.04
6 (4)
2
12Q
3.05
3, 5
2
13, 15 -31
3
1, 3, 4
3.06
2, 3, 10
2
1, 2, 4, 7
3.09
11
2
33
3.16
6
2
3
3.34A
13
4
1
3.40
3
4
2
3.41
8
4
3 6(a)
3.42
10
4
4
3.47
6
3
2
3.47
11
2
34
3.47
17
2
35
3.54
9
4
5
4.02
7
2
32
4.03
4
2
9
4.04
3
2
8
4.05
3
2
36
4
6(b)
4.07
5
2
4, 5
5.08
2
1
5.09
1
5.12
1, 2
1
5.17
4
5
1
5.18
5
5
2
5.19
5
5
3(b)
♦.;.
C � ! a .:
.�Jl... -� .. _..
_ _ r :'�
}
Section 2. Construction and Related Permit Fees.and Charges
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Building Permits 3.06
(2) Fire Extin-
guishing System
Permit
(3) Swimming Pool
.Erection Permits
(4) Plan Checking
_(5) Dwelling Moving
(6) Garage Moving
3.06
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
Fee
$
50
-' $ 1,000
$1S
$ 1,001
-
$ 2,000
Portable pools
$15 plus $1.00 for each $100
No fee shall-be charged
for construction or erection
or fraction thereof over
deepest part and not
exceeding 177 square feet in
$1,000.
2,001
-$
50,000
fee, except no fee for the
$25 plus $3.00 for each $1,000
following:
State
(a) Existing single
or fraction thereof over $2,000,
50,001
-
$100,000
Code
$169 plus $2.50 for each $1,000
family dwelling repair and
maintenance work.
or fraction thereof over
(c) Commercial and
industrial repair and -main-
tenance work not exceeding $1,000.
$50,000.
$100,001
-
'$500,000
In Richfield
$294 plus $2.00 for each $1,000
Outside Richfield
$50.00
or fraction thereof over
Within Richfield.
$25.00
$100,000.
$500,001
-
and over
$1,194 plus $1.00 for each
$25.00
4.07
Pre - inspection fee
$15.00
$1,000 or fraction thereof
Moving permit ee
first stall
over $100,000.
Based on .Building Permit fee
schedule minimum $15.:00
3.16
Permanent pools
Based on Building Permit
above or below
ground.
Portable pools
$10.00
No fee shall-be charged
for construction or erection
of any pool 24 inches or less in depth at its
deepest part and not
exceeding 177 square feet in
water surface area.
3.06
50% of building permit
fee, except no fee for the
and
following:
State
(a) Existing single
family dwelling alterations
Building
when habitable area
is not enlarged.
Code
(b) Single and two
family dwelling repair and
maintenance work.
(c) Commercial and
industrial repair and -main-
tenance work not exceeding $1,000.
4.07
Pre - inspection fee
In Richfield
$25.00
Outside Richfield
$50.00
Moving Permit fee
Within Richfield.
$25.00
Into Richfield
$50.00
Moving out of City
$25.00
4.07
Pre - inspection fee
$15.00
Moving permit ee
first stall
$10.00
Plus each
aa&joining stall
$ 5.00
Moving out of City
$10.00
-4-
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
Structure 3.06
Demolition
(a) Commercial
(b) Dwelling
b.l One or two story
b.2 Multiple
b.3 Residential garage
and other lesser
structure
8 Driveway, Sidewalk,
Curb and Gutter
Construction 4.04
(9) Sewer Excavation 4.03
(1.0) Sewer Construction 8.03
(11) Plumbing Permit
Residential 3.04
a. Minimum fee
b. Fee per fixture including:
Bath tub
Bidet
Clothes dryer
Dishwasher
Disposal
Floor drain
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
Demolition cost as per building permit
Fee
schedule Minimum $15.00
10.00
First unit $10.00
plus each additional unit 5.00
5.00
$5.00 except that fee is $25.00 when survey
and grade stakes are set by the City.
$5.00 for each transverse excavation and each
300 feet or portion thereof of longitudinal
excavation.
Residential and commercial 7.50
Industrial 15.00
$10.00
Floor tray
Laundry tray
Lavatory
Sewage ejector
Shower stall
Sink
Water closet
Water heater, new or replacement $ 5.00
c. Gas piping unit including:
Clothes dryer
Grill
Incinerator (up to 99,000 BTU)
Light
Oven
Flate
Love
Water heater (up to 99,000 BTU) $ 5.00
' -5-
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation Fee
d. Lawn sprinkler
anti- syphon system (includes
water connection from building
piping and yard side of syphon
breaker ) $14.00
e. Pool heater (up to 199,000 BTU) $28.00
f. Water softener 6.00
g. Water supply or distributor piping,
extension or alteration 6.00
(12) Plumbing Permit
Commercial 3.04
a. Minimum fee $20.00
b. Fee per fixture including;
Bidet
Disposer
Drinking fountain
Floor drain or trap
Plaster interceptor
Sinks; Bradley -type wash -up, service,
flat -rim, bar, counter,
laboratory, pot or scullery
Urinal
Any fixture not listed above 5.00
c. Clothes washer First five units or less $15.00
Each additional unit 4.00
d. Dental chair $25.00
e. Dishwasher $10.00
f. Food cold case
condensate lines (each unit) 5.00
g. Flammable waste trap
catch basin $10.00
h. Ground run (new for
existing building) $12.00
i. Ice - making machines 5.00
j. Indirect coil for hot
water storage $10.00
k. Lawn sprinkler, anti - syphon
system (including water con-
nection from building piping to
yard side of syphon breaker) $25.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
2
inch casing
$ 7.00
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
FEE SCHEDULE
inch casing
10.00
Total Valuation
4
Fee
1. Neutralizing tan
5
$25.00
m. Rainwater leader
All stacks 10 stories
or less
10.00
All stacks over 10 stories
$15.00
n. Roof area drains (each)
a. Minimum fee
5.00
o. Sewage ejector
10.00
b. Complete wiring fee:
$10.00
p. Shower (gang type per head)
$ 3.00
q. Water softener
$35.00
10.00
r. Water supply or distributor
piping,
$65.00
c. New service - up to 200 amps
extension or alteration
7.50
15.00
S. Installation of gas pipina
I. Up to 2 inches in
diameter:
First 3 openings
3.50
Each additional opening
$ 1.50
II. Exceeding 2 inches
in diameter:
First 3 openings
$10.00
Each additional openin
$ 2.00
(13) Plumbing Permit
Gas Unit
Installation 3.05
99,000 BTU or less
$7.00
100,000 - 199,000
BTU
$12.00
200,000 - 399,000
BTU
$24.00
400,000 - 599,000
BTU
$36.00
600,000 - 999,000
BTU
$48.00
1,000,000 - 2,499,000
BTU
$80.00
2,500,000 - 9,999,000
BTU
$96.00
10,000,000 - 49,999,000
BTU
$140.00
50,000,000 - 74,999,000
BTU
$180.00
More than 74,999,000
BTU
$240.00
(14) Plumbing Permit
Wells 6.03
2
inch casing
$ 7.00
3
inch casing
10.00
4
inch casing
$15.00
5
inch casing
$25.00
_(15) Electrical Permit
Residential 3.05
a. Minimum fee
10.00
b. Complete wiring fee:
Singe ami y rest ence
$35.00
Two - family rest d ence
$65.00
c. New service - up to 200 amps
7.50
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE
Total Valuation Fee
d. Temporary service - for construction $10.00
e. Installation or replacement of
each major appliance after com-
pletion of building 3.00
f. Swimming pools. $15.00
g. Wiring of addition: -
First room 7.50
Each additional room 2.50
SECTION
REQUIRING
-7-
FEE SCHEDULE
h. Rewiring
First room
7.50
Each additional room
2.50
i. Rewiring for residential garages
7.50
j. Furnace or Air Cond.
(each)_
5.00
(16) Electrical Permit
Multiple Dwellings over
two - family 3.05
a. Minimum fee
$10.00
b. Complete wiring
1 - 5
units
$70.00
6 - 12
units
$70.00 plus
$14 per unit over 5
13 - 22
units
$168.00 plus
$12 per unit over 12
Over 22
units
$288.00 plus
$10 per unit over 22
c. Wiring of garages
$15.00
for first
stall plus $1.00 for each additional
d. Temporary service for
construction
$10.00
e. Swimming pools
$35.00
f. Rewiring
$10.00
for first
unit plus $5.00 for each additional
g. Furnace or Air
Conditioner (each)
Over 4
ton based
on cost $10.00
(17) Electrical Permit
Commercial and
Industrial 3.05
a. Permanent service Based on cost of job to customer
$100 or less $0.00
$101 - $50,000 11
Over $50,000 $500.00 1n 1,.s,
3/4% of cost over $50,000
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE
SECTION
REQUIRING
b. Temporary services
for construction
M
Total Valuation
0 - 100 amps
100 plus amps
FEE SCHEDULE
Fee
10.00
20.00
18 Electrical Permit
Signs 3.05 Based on cost of electrical _job to customer
$100 or less $10.00
$101 - $50,000 1%
(19) Electrical Permit
Fire Alarm System 3.05 Systems connected to municipal fire alarm system
1 - 5 stations 5.00
Each group of 10 stations or less 5.00
Total fee shall not exceed $40.00
(20) Electrical Permit
Telephone Booths 3.05
a. Wiring of booth
b. Each lighted sign installed
on interior of booth
(21) Heating, Ventilating
Air Conditioning and
Refrigeration Fee 3.05
a. Central system
Additions, Alterations
and Repairs
c. Addition of air condi-
tioning to existing
heating systems
d. Furance of boiler
placement
�22) Heating, Ventilating, Air
Conditioning Fee
Ventilation and exhaust
systems 3.05
a. Svstems installed with
central systems
5.00
3.00
1 1/4% of estimated cost with a
minimum of 20.00
1 1/4% of estimated cost with a
minimum of 5.00
1 1/4% of estimated cost with a
minimum of $15.00
1 1/4% of estimated cost with a
minimum of $10.00
1 1/4% of estimated cost with a
minimum of 5.00
b, Systems with "small _type"
(up to 200 cfm) exhaust
fans $5.00 per occupancy, rental unit or residence
WL
TYPE OF _PERMIT
OR LICENSE
SECTION
REQUIRING
Total Valuation
(23 ) Heating, Ventilating,
Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee
Gas and Oil Permits 3.05
FEE SCHEDULE
Fee
a. Permit for installations $5.00 per unit with input of up to 99,000 BTU
or replacement of con-
version burner, unit heater,l 1/4% of estimated cost for units exceeding
floor furnace, wall heater 100,000 BTU input with minimum of $10.00
or space heater per unit
b. Gas piping
(24) Heating, Ventilation,
Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee
Conversion from Z.P.
to natural gas 3.05
(25) Heating, Ventilation,
Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee
Process Equipment 3.05
(Installation of anv
steam, hot water, or
warm air system fired
with gas or oil used
in connection with
process application
(26) Heating, Ventilation,
Air Conditioning
Refrigeration Fee
Storage tanks 3.05
a. Fuel storage tanks
$1.50 per unit for first 5 units
$ .50 for each additional unit
$2.00 for each heating unit
$1.00 for each minor applicance
minimum of 5.00
(fees include piping)
1 1/4% of estimated cost with
minimum of $10.00
(underground or en-
closed). Installation
to be used with oil $ 5.00 per tank to 1,000 gallons
burner only $10.00 per tank exceeding 1,000 gallons
b. Fuel storage tanks
(above ground or not en-
closed). Installation to
be used with oil burner
only. Per tank 3.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
c. Other tanks
Installation mod-
ification, removal
abandonment
(27) Heating, Ventilating,
.Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee.
Installation of stokers
and /or powered fuel
burners 3.05
(28) Heating, Ventilating,
Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee
Electrical heating 3.05
-10-
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
Fee
$15_.00 each above ground tank
$50.00 each below ground tank
$ 7.50 for installation or alteration of piping
1% of estimated job cost
Minimum of
a. Electric heating system 1 1/4% of estimated cost
(central type) installation Minimum of
_ Electric unit and
infrared (radiant)
heater
c. Electrical baseboard
radiant unit
29 Heating,_ Ventilating,
Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee
Engineering /heat loss
calculations fili_i2
fee -3.05
a. Installation of any re-
frigeration system
except portable systems
b. Refrigeration systems,
additions, alterations,
repairs
(30) Heating, Ventilating,
Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration Fee
Installation, alteration,
$5.00 first unit
$3.00 each additional unit
10.00
$10.00
$5.00 first kw
$2.00 each additional 3 kw or fraction thereof
5.00
Up to 3 HP
system
6.00
3 HP - 15 HP
syst
$1.0.00
15 HP - 50 HP
system
$25.00
Over 50 HP
syst
$50.00
1 1/4% of estimated cost Minimum 5.00
modification, relocation, or
replacement-of non - portable' Each tank $7.5.00 .
propane or L.P. or propane Each vaporizer 7.50
storage racility 3.05 Gas piping r
-11-
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
Total Valuation
(31) Benches 4.02
(32) Fire Prevention
Code 3.09
New Materials, etc.
(33) Sign Installation 3.47
(34) Sign Maintenance 3.47
a. Billboards
b. Other signs
(35) Parking Areas 4.05
FEE SCHEDULE
First year
Renewal
Year
50 sq. ft.or less Year
Each additional
sq. ft. or less Year
$.15 /sq. ft. with minimum
$.07 /sq. ft. with minu.imum
Fee
6.00
5.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
$20.00 /year
$ 7.50 /year
5.00
-12-
Section 3. Construction and Related License Fees
TYPE OF PERMIT
SECTION
OR LICENSE
REQUIRING
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
Fee
(1) Heating and
3.05
$34.00 /year
Ventilating
Installer
(2) Sign Installer
3.47
$25.00 /year
(3) Electrical Installer 3.05
State license
required
(4) Plumber
3.05
State license
required
(5) Water Softener
3.04
_$25.00 /year
Installer
(6) Well Driller
6.03
25.00/year
Section 4. Zoning, Land
Use and Related Fees and Charges
(1) Plannued Unit
3.34A
In addition to other related fees:
Development
1 - 2 acres
130.00
2 - 3 acres
230.00
3 - 4 acres
�'25S 0.00
4 - 5 acres
$275.00
5 - 6 acres
$300.00
.6 plus acres
350.00
(2) Variance
3.40
Based on Value of
Building or Development
Base fee to and including $1,000
50.00
Each additional $1,000
up to $10,000
5.00
Each additional $1,000
from $10,000
to $25,000
2.00
Each additional $1,000
over $252000
1.00
(3) Special Use Permit 3.41 Base fee to and includir_g $1,000 75.00
Each additional $1,_000 up to $10,000 5.00
Each additional $1,000 from $10,000
to $25,000 2.00
Each additional $1,000 over $25,000 1.00
4) District Change 3.42 Once acre or less $150.00
Each additional acre or part thereof
up to five acres 20.00
Each additional acre between five
and twenty -five acres 10.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(5) Plat Review 3.54
(Subdivision of Land)
(6� Off- Street Parking 4.05
Contract
a. As part of special
use permit process 3.41
b. In conjunction
with permitted use
(7) Street Vacation 12.04
-13-
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
Waiver of preliminary platting _pro
-
cedures for divisions creating
three or less lots
_Parking and final plat review for
division of land creating four
lots or more
Section 5. Amusement and Recreation Licenses and Permits
(1) Arcade 5.17
(2) Amusement Device 5.18
a. Mechanical Amuse-
ment Device
b. Mechanical Music
Box
(3) Bin &o 5.19
a. Daily Permit
b. Annual License
(4) Itinerant Place of 5.20
Amusement
(5) Public Dance 5.21
(6) General Amusement 5.22
a. Billiard, Pool or
Pigeonhole table (each)
a.l Coin operated
One year
One year
One year
Fee
25.00
Base fee $50.00
plus $5.00 for
each lot created
0.00
50.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
25.00
$30.00 /day (subject to waiver by council)
One year $200.00
Each day $100.00
$2.00 for each day during permit period in
which dances are held. No fee for locations
holding tavern licenses.
One year 10.00
One year 50.00
-14-
TYPE
OF PERMIT
SECTION
1.50
Either dog or cat
OR
LICENSE
REQUIRING
FEE SCHEDULE
$50.00
One year
$10.00
One year
Total Valuation
Fee
$15.00
b. Bowling Alley
(per lane)
One year
$10.00
c. Circus
One year
100.00
d. Dance Hall
One day
$100.00
e. Golf
e.l.Minature
One year
$10.00
e.2. Driving tee
One year
$10.00
f. Mountebank
One day
$100.00
g Rides, mechanical
or animal of any
kind (each)
One year
$10.00
h. Shows, any kind
One day
$100.00
i. Shuffleboard (each lane)
One year
$10.00
_j. Theatrical Performances
One day
100.00
k. Other Eames
$50.00
/day or less as council designates.
(7)
Theatre - Cinema
5.23
One year
$100.00
(8)
Roller Rink
5.24 $100.00
/year or portion
(9)
Sauna and Massage
Parlor
5.25
One year
$1,500.00
Investigation fee
5.25
Actual Cost, Minimum
$1,500.00
(10)
Massage ractitioner
.ZT
One year
25.00
Investigation fee
5.26
Actual Cost, Minimum
$75.00
(11)
Fortune Teller and
5.30
One day
$10.00
Related Trade
One week
$25.00
One month
$50.00
One year
$300.00
(12) Animals
a. Dog license 5.27
b. Cat license 5.27
c. Duplicate license 5.27
d. Late license.
penalty 5.27
e. Coimnercial kennel 5.28
f. Residential kennel 5.28
&. Pigeons 10.05
h. Non - domestic
Animals 10.06
One year
3.00
One year
1.50
Either dog or cat
.50
Each animal
5.00
One year
$50.00
One year
$10.00
One year
5.00
Temporary permit
$15.00
15-
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation Fee
i. Impounding fees 5.27
i.l Each animal
5.00
i.2 Impounding penalty
Second time
5.00
Third time
$10.00
Fourth time
$15.00
Section 6 Vehicle and Transportation License and Permit Fees
(1) Bicycle
5.34
Minnesota State Registration
(2) Aircraft
5.35
One day
25.00
(3) Food Vehicle
6.01
a. Baker
One year
$15.00
b. .Catering
$100.00 /year plus $5.00 /year for each
additional catering food vehicle under
same ownership and operation
c. Readily
Per vehicle per _year or
5.00
Perishable
per fleet per year
$15.00
(4) Garbage and Refuse
25.00 /year for first vehicle and
Collection
6.06
�10 00 /year for each additional vehicle
(5) Motor Vehicle Dealer
6.07
a. New vehicle sales
50.00 /year for first place of business
15.00 /year for each additional place
of business
(6) Motor Bicycle
6.08
$50.00 /year /place of business to sell
Business
motor bicycles
75.00 /year /place of business to sell,
rent or lease motor bicycles
(7) Sound Truck
6.14
Annual fee
50.00/
vehicle
Daily fee
3.00/
vehicle for first
day and
1.00 /vehicle for
each
additional day.
(8) Taxicab
6.20
$20.00 /year for first taxicab or auto
livery and $10_.00 /year for each additional
taxicab or auto livery operated at any
time
within the license period.
(9) Taxicab Driver
6.21
One year
$50.00
( 0 ) Rental of Utility
6.22
Trailers and Trucks
X25.00/year for each place of business_
-16-
Section 7. Commercial Business and Trade Licenses and Permits
TYPE
OF PERMIT
SECTION
OR
LICENSE
REQUIRING
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
'Fee
(1)
Firearms Dealer
5.29
One year
1.00
2
Itinerant Food
Establishment
6.01
One year
15.00
S3)
Retail Candy Shop
6.01
$25.00 /year plus
$5.00 for each
additional
facility on same
premise.
(4)
Food Establishment
6.01
$25.00 /year plus
$5.00 for each
additional
facility on same
premise.
.5) Vending Machine 6.01
a. Food vending machine
requiring coin or token
b. Other food vending
machine
C. Ice vending machine
(6) Automobile Clashing
Establishment 6.04
(7) Scavenger
(8) Incinerator
_(91 Tobacco
a. Sale and dis-
tribution
b. Vending machine
6.05
6.06
6.11
10 Soft Drink 6.13
a. Vending machine
(11) Transient Merchant 6.15
(12) Wagon Peddler 6.16
One year $ 5.00
$5.00 /year each food dispensing unit
in the machine not to exceed $50.00.
One year $10.00
One year $25.00
$20.00 /year or portion thereof per
vehicle plus $1.00 permit fee for
opening cesspool or dumping contents
of each cesspool into city sewer.
One year 5.00
1.00 /month or fraction thereof. _License
issued on calendar year basis.
One license included with (a) above. $5.00/
vear or fraction thereof per each additional
machine.
One year 5.00
One license included with (8) above. $5.00/
year or fraction thereof per each additional
machine.
One da $10.00
One year 50.00
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE
(13) Christmas Tree
Sales
(14) Motel
(15) Outdoor
Merchandising
-17-
SECTION
REQUIRING
Total Valuation
6.18
FEE SCHEDULE
Fee
One year $25.00
6.19 $5.00 /year for first unit and $2.50/
year for each additional unit.
6.23
Section 8. Liquor and Related License and Permit Fees
Permit
10.00
TYPE OF PERMIT
SECTION
OR LICENSE
REQUIRI_NG
FEE SCHEDULE
Total Valuation
Fee
(1) Non- Intoxicating
Malt Liquor
11.02
a. On -sale
One year
$ 200.00
b. Tavern (dance)
One year
$ 300.00
c. Wholesale
One year
10.00
d. Off -sale
One year
25.00
e. Club
One year
100.00
(2) Liquor
a. Club
11.03
One year
$ 100.00
b. Set ups
11'.03
One year $300.00,
plus additional
$100 permit
fee for each person obtaining state permit
for consumption or
display of intoxicating
liquor pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 340.14,
Subdivision 3.
c. On -sale
11.06
One year
$7,500.00
d. Sunday
11.07
One year
$ 200.00
(3) Employee License
a. Set -up estab-
lishments
11.03
$5.00 /year /person
covered
b. On -sale liquor
establishments
11.06
$5.00 /year /person
covered
(4) Investigation Fee
a. Club 11.03
b. On-sale liquor 11.06
Single person $ 75.00
Partnership 150.00
Corporation $ 300.00
Additional investigation 50.00
Each person shown on application $ 100.00 or
actual cost in excess of above. ___.
Additional investigation, eac person
not listed on original or renewal
application. $ 100.00
Section 9. Miscellaneous Fees
SECTION
ACTIVITY REQUIRING
(1) Registration 6.17
a. State hawker or
Peddler's license
b. Canvasser or
Solicitor
(2) Permit to reside
in motel for more
than six months
0
6.19
-18-
FEE SCHEDULE
$3.00 /year /person. covered
$3.00 /year /person covered
1.00
=19-
III. Chapter III, Part I, Section 3.04, Subdivision 4 and Subdivision 6, Paragraphs
2 and 4 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield relating to permits for
plumbing work are hereby amended to read as follows:
113.04. Subd. 4. Permits Required. Except as otherwise provided in Subd. 6,
hereof, it is unlawful for any person to perform any plumbing work regulated
by this chapter without first having obtained a permit as provided in Section
3.06 and paid all applicable fees contained in Appendix D of this Code. Permits
required by this section may be issued only to persons duly licensed by the
State of Minnesota as provided in Minnesota Statutes 326.37, et. seq."
"3.04. Subd. 6. (2) The annual license fee for such license shall be as
provided in Appendix D of this Code [$25.00].
(4) No water softening device shall be installed or connected to any
water pipe or main unless a permit for such installation or connection shall
have been issued by the chief inspector. The fee for said permit shall be
as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$5.00]. No such permit shall be
issued to any person not licensed hereunder, except as otherwise authorized
by Section 3.04. Such permit may be granted under this subdivision or such
other applicable provisions of Section 3.04 without duplication of fees.
Where a permit has been issued for such an installation or connection, no
additional permit shall be required for subsequent interchange of water
softening devices or units involving the same water pipe connection and no
additional cutting of the water pipe."
III. Chapter III, Part I, Section 3.05 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to heating, gas piping and electrical work is hereby amended
by amending Subdivision 3 and adding Subdivision 5 which subdivisions shall read
as follows:
"3.05. Subd. 3. License Fees; Heating and Ventilating. The annual license
fee for heating and ventilating construction and installation shall be as
provided in Appendix D of this Code [is $34.00]."
"3.05. Subd. 5. License Fees. All fees required for permits and licenses
issued pursuant to this section shall be as contained in Appendix D of this
Code."
IV. Chapter III, Part I, Section 3.06 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to building and construction permits is hereby amended by
amending Subdivisions 2, 3, 10 and 11, which subdivisions shall read as follows:
1!3.06. Subd. 2. Issuance of Permit - Single Family Dwellings. In the case
of a private single dwelling house not exceeding two stories in height, ex-
clusive of any attic, the building inspector shall determine from such plans
and specifications whether or not the provisions of this Code will be com-
plied with and, if satisfied of such compliance, he shall thereupon issue
such permit [under] upon the payment to the city treasurer of the [proper]
fee or fees provided in Appendix D of this Code."
-20-
"3.06. Subd. 3. Issuance of Permit Other Structures. In the case of
buildings and structures other than single family dwelling houses, as
defined in Subd. 2 of this section, the building inspector shall likewise
determine whether or not the provisions of this Code will be complied with
and if satisfied with such compliance, he shall thereupon issue such permit
upon the payment to the city treasurer of the [proper] fee or fees provided
in Appendix D of this Code."
"3.06. Subd. 10. Permit Fees. A fee for each permit required by this chapter
shall be paid to the treasurer in the amount provided in Appendix D of this
Code. [as set forth in Tables III -A and III -B. With the exception of Table
III -B,] It is the intent of this section that the fees [herein] provided in
Appendix D of this Code are to supplant and supersede corresponding fee
requirements in any code or ordinance adopted by reference in this chapter
as well as any fee schedules provided in the State Building Code.
Total Valuation
$50 to $500
$501 to $2,000
$2,001 to $25,000
$25,001 to $50,000
$50,001 to $100,000
$100,001 and up
[TABLE III -A - --
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Fee
$5
$5 for the first $500 plus $1 for each additional
$100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000
$20 for the first $2,000 plus $3 for each addit-
ional thousand or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000
$89 for the first $25,000 plus $2.00 for each
additional thousand or fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000
$151.50 for the first $50,000 plus $1.50 for
each additional thousand or fraction thereof,
to and including $100,000
$226.50 for the first $100,000 plus $1 for each
additional thousand or fraction thereof.
TABLE III -B - --
PLUMBING, HEATING, ELECTRICAL AND GAS PIPING FEES
All fees shall be identical to those provided in ordinances of the City of
Minneapolis adopted by reference in this chapter.]"
"3.06. Subd. 11. Amendments to Fee Schedules. The city may amend any of the
fee schedules contained in Appendix D [this subdivison]. Whenever iee schedules
are fully set forth in Appendix D [this chapter] these schedules shall super-
sede any schedules and fees contained or included in codes or ordinances adopted
by reference in this Code. The city council may waive the city's portion of
building permit and plan review fees chargeable to another political subdivision
of the state if the council finds that such action is appropriate by reason of
unusual circumstances unique to the particular project involved and that the
public interests of the city will be served thereby."
V. Chapter III, Part I, Section 3.09 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to fire prevention is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 11 thereof to
read as follows:
"3.09. Subd. 11. Permit Fee. The annual fee for any permit required under
the provisions of this section shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code
[is $5.001. Such permit fee shall be paid to the clerk and such annual permit
fee shall not be prorated for any portion of a year. Permits are issued on a
calendar year basis."
-21-,
VI. Chapter III, Part II, Section 3.16 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to the construction, operation and maintenance of swimming
pools is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 6 thereof to read as follows:
"3.16. Subd. 6. Permit Fees. The fee for a permit for the erection
or construction of a swimming pool shall be as provided in Appendix D
of this Code [is Ten Dollars ($10.00) for each 500 square feet of
surface area and One Dollar ($1.00) for each additional 100 square
feet or fraction thereof as determined by the plans and specifications
submitted with the application for permit]."
VII. Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.34A of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with planned unit development is hereby amended by adding Sub-
division 13 thereto to read as follows:
"Subd. 13. The application requesting the establishment of a planned
unit development district shall be accompanied by the fee provided in
Appendix D of this Code for such application together with all other
fees required by this Code."
VIII. Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.40 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with zoning adjustments and appeals is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 3 thereof to read as follows:
"3.40. Subd. 3. Application for Adjustment -Fee. Application for any
adjustment permissible under provisions of this section shall be made
to the chief inspector by written application. An application for ad-
justment shall be accompanied by payment of a fee as provided in Appendix
D of this Code [of $10.00] in addition to the regular building fee, if any."
IX. Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.41 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to special use permits is hereby amended by adding thereto
Subdivision 8 to read as follows:
"Subd. 8. Special Use Permit - Fee. Application for a special use permit
shall be accompanied with the required fee provided in Appendix D of this
Code."
X. Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.42 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to amendments to the zoning ordinance is hereby amended by
addition thereto Subdivision 10 to read as follows:
"Subd. 10. Amendment - Fee. The fee provided in Appendix of this Code_
shall accompany all petitions for zoning district change not initiated
by the City Council."
XI. Chapter III, Part V, Section 3.47 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to regulating signs and billboards is hereby amended by
amending Subdivisions 6, 11 and 17 thereof to read as follows:
"3.47. Subd. 6. Application and Fee. A license may be granted
by the council upon written application to the clerk, in such form
as required by the manager, and accompanied by an annual license
fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code [of Twenty -five dollars
($25.00)1."
-22-
"Subd. 11. Annual Permit Fees. The application for a permit shall
be accompanied by the [required] permit fee provided in Appendix D
of this Code [which is as follows:
For a sign not exceeding 100 square feet $5.00
For each additional 50 square feet or fraction thereof $2.001
The [foregoing] fees required under this subdivision are in addition
to any electrical and building permit fees required by this code"
"Subd. 17. Annual Maintenance Permit Fee The application for the
maintenance permit shall be accompanied by the [required] permit fee
established in Appendix D of this Code [, which is as follows:
Type of Sign
Billboards
Other signs
Rate
7(� per sq. ft.
2(,, per sq. ft.
Minimum Fee
$10.00
2.00]'r
XII. Chapter III, Part VI, Section. 3.54 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to regulating the subdivision of land is hereby amended by
adding thereto Subdivision 9 to read as follows:
"Subd. 9. Applications for plat or subdivision approval or for waiver
of preliminary platting procedures shall be accompanied by the fee
provided in APp en.dix D of this Code."
XIII. Chapter IV, Section 4.02 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
of Richfield relating to certain structures on public walks and places is hereby
amended by amending Subdivision 7 thereof to read as follows:
"x4.02. Subd. 7. Permit Fees. The permit fee and renewal fee shall be
as provided in Appendix D of this Code [is $6.00. The fee for renewal
of a permit is $5.00]."
XIV. Chapter IV, Section 4.03 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to street excavation is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 4 thereof
to read as follows:
"4.03. Subd. 4. Permit Fees. The permit fee [is $5.001 for each location
covered by the permit shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code.
Each transverse excavation and each 300 feet or portion thereof of longi-
tudinal excavation is deemed a location."
XV. Chapter IV, Section 4.04 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to the construction of driveways, sidewalks, curb and gutter is hereby
amended by amending Subdivision 3 thereof to read as follows:
"4.04. Subd. 3. Permit Fees. The permit fee [is $5.00] including instances
where a survey and [the] .a setting of grade stakes must be performed by the
city, the permit fee is as provided by Appendix D of this Code [is $25.00].
Permits expire one year after issuance."
XVI. Chapter IV, Section 4.05 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to driveways and parking areas is hereby amended by amending Subdivision
3 thereof to read as follows:
-23-
"4.05. Subd. 3. Permit Fee. The permit fee is as provided in Appendix D
of this Code [$5.00]."
XVII. Chapter IV, Section 4.07 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
dealing with the moving of buildings is hereby amended by amending Subdivision
5 thereof to read as follows:
"4.07. Subd. 5. Permit Fee. The application shall be accompanied by a
permit fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code. [The fees are $10.00
for the moving of a building other than a garage from within the city;
$100.00 for the moving of a building other than a garage into the city,
and $5.00 for the moving of a garage or other accessory building into or
within the city. If the building to be moved is located outside the city,
such fee shall be augmented by a charge of 10t per mile beyond the city
limits to defray inspection costs.]"
XVIII. Chapter V, Part 1, Section 5.08 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to procedures for issuance of licenses is hereby amended
by amending Subdivision 2 thereof to read as follows:
"5.08. Subd. 2. License Fees. The application form shall be ac-
companied by the full amount of fees chargeable for such license
as provided in Appendix D of this Code [, unless otherwise provided]."
XIX. Chapter V, Part I, Section 5.09 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to procedure for license renewals is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"5.09. Procedure for Renewal of License. Application for renewal of a
license when available shall be submitted on forms provided by the clerk
for that purpose. The applicant shall, upon request of the clerk, dis-
close such information concerning his conduct and operation of his business
during the preceding license period as is necessary to the proper determi-
nation of the applicant's eligibility for a renewal license. The application
for renewal of a license shall be accompanied by the full amount of fees
[charged] chargeable for such renewal as provided in Appendix D of this Code.
[Unless otherwise specified, the fee for renewal shall be the same as the
fee for the initial license for such activity]."
XX. Chapter V, Part 1, Section 5.12 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to the establishment of fees is hereby amended by amending Subdivisions 1
and 2 thereof to read as follows:
"5.12. Subd. 1. Fee Established. License fees are in the amounts
established in Appendix D of this Code [the governing sections of this
chapter or Chapter VI and as otherwise provided in the Code]."
"5.12. Subd. 2. Fee Compilation in Appendix D. A compilation of all
fees and permits is maintained in Appendix D to this Code. [This appendix
is maintained for convenience and reference only.] The license and permit
fees as set forth in Appendix D of this Code [the various sections of this
Code] are the official and controlling provisions."
-24-
XXI. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.17 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to the licensing of Arcades is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 4 thereof to read as follows:
"5.17. Subd. 4. License Fees and License Period. The license shall
be for the calendar year or remaining portion thereof. The license
fee shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$100.00 for such
period]. The entire fee shall accompany the application and such fee
shall be refunded only if the application is withdrawn before council
consideration of the application."
XXII. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.18 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to the licensing of amusement devices is hereby amended
by amending Subdivision 5 thereof to read as follows:
"5.15. Subd. 5. License Fees. The license fee for each mechanical
amusement device is as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$5.00 per
year]. The license fee for each mechanical music box is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [$25.00 per year]."
XXIII. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.19 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with the licensing of bingo is hereby amended by amending
Subdivisions 5 and 16 thereof to read as follows:
"5.19. Subd. 5. License Fee and License Year. The annual license
fee shall be as rovided in Appendix D of this Code [$200.00]. The
annual license shall run from January 1 to December 31 of the year."
"Subd. 16. Exemptions. In lieu of obtaining the annual license as
provided in this section, daily permits may be issued, covering the
conduct of bingo if conducted:
(1) In connection with a county fair conducted by a county
agricultural society or association, the state fair con-
ducted by the state agricultural society, or a civic cele-
bration recognized by resolution or other similar action
by the city council provided that bingo is not conducted
more than twelve consecutive days in any one calendar year.
(2) By an organization which conducts less than five bingo
occasions in any calendar year.
Application for daily permits shall be on forms prepared for the city
clerk for that purpose. Applications shall be presented to the council
for its approval. The daily permit fee shall be as provided in Appendix
D of this Code [$30.00] and the city council may waive all or part of
the fee. The council may also place such conditions and restrictions
upon the daily permit as it shall deem necessary."
XXIV. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.20 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to itinerant places of amusement is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 4 thereof to read as follows:
"5.20.Subd. 4. License Fee. The license fee is as provided in Appendix
D of this Code [$100.00 for each day for which the license is sought]."
-25-
XXV. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.21 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with public dances is hereby amended by amending Subdivision
5 thereof to read as follows:
115.21. Subd. 5. Permit Fee. The fee for such permit is as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$2.00 for each day on which the dances are to be
held, except where a tavern license is in effect obtained in accordance
with the provisions of Chapter XI of this code]."
XXVI. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.22 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with general amusements is hereby amended by amending Sub-
division 5 thereof to read as follows:
"5.22. Subd. 5. License Fees. Upon the payment of the license fee
provided in Appendix D of this Code the clerk shall issue a license
to the applicant whose application has been approved by the council.
[The following are the rates for licenses:
Billiard, pool, or pigeonhole
Bowling Alley (per lane)
Circus
Dance Hall
Golf, Minature
Golf, Driving Tee
Mountebank
Rides, mechanical or animal of
Shows, any kind
Shuffleboard (each lane)
Theatrical Performances
table (each)
any kind (each)
$ 10.00 per year
10.00 per year
100.00 per day
100.00 per day
_10.00 per year
10.00 per year
100.00 per day
10.00 per year
100.00 per day
10.00 per year
100.00 per day
Applicants for other games not specifically enumerated but covered by
this section shall pay an amount not exceeding $50.00 per day, as the
council may designate.]"
XXVII. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.23 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with theatres is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 3
thereof to read as follows:
"5.23. Subd. 3. License Fee. The license fee is as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$100.00 per year].
XXVIII. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.24 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to roller rinks is hereby amended by amending Subdivison 4
thereof to read as follows:
"5.24. Subd. 4. License Fee. The license fee required hereunder is
as provided in Appendix D_of this Code [$100.00 per year or fraction
thereof]."
XXIX. Chapter V. Part II, Section 5.25 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield regulating saunas and massage parlors is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 4 thereof to read as follows:
"5.25. Subd. 4. License Fees and License Year.
(1) The annual license fee is as provided in Appendix D of this Code.
[$1,500] The license fee shall be paid when the application is filed.
In the event that he application is denied or in the event that the
license once issued is revoked, cancelled, suspended or surrendered,
-26-
no part of the annual fee shall be returned to the applicant unless
by council action.
(2) At the time of each original application for a license, the
applicant shall also pay a minimum investigating fee. This minimum
fee shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$1,500]. If the
expenses of the investigation relating to any application exceed the
minimum investigating fee, the city shall notify the applicant of this
fact and shall require the applicant to pay an additional investigating
fee which the City Manager deems necessary to complete its investigating
of the applicant. The applicant shall pay such an additional investi-
gating fee within five (5) days of being so notified. If such additional
investigating fee is not paid within such five -day period, the city shall
discontinue consideration of the application."
XXX. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.26 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the practice of massage is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 5 thereof
to read as follows:
"5.26. Subd. 5. Certificate Fee and Certificate Year.
(1) The annual certificate fee is as provided in Appendix D of this
Code [$25.00]. A certificate unless revoked is for the calendar year,
or part thereof for which it has been issued.
(2) At the time of each original application for a certificate, the
applicant shall also pay a minim investigating fee. This minimum fee
shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$75.00]. The minimum
investigating fee shall not be subject to refund. If the expenses of
the investigation relating to any application exceed the minimum investi-
gating fee, the city shall notify the applicant of this fact and shall
require the applicant to pay an additional investigating fee which the
City Manager deems necessary to complete its investigation of the appli-
cant. The applicant shall pay such an additional investiging fee within
five (5) days of being so notified. If such additional investigating
fee is not paid within such five -day period, the city shall discontinue
consideration of the application."
XXXI. Chapter V, Part III, Section 5.27 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield providing for the licensing of domestic animals is hereby amended
by amending Subdivisions 3, 4, 8 and 18 thereof to read as follows:
"5.27. Subd. 3. License Fees. The license fee for each do licensee
[is $3.00.] the license fee for each cat license g
, [is $I.50.] and the
charge for a duplicate license for either animal is [$.50] as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [Subd. 8 of this section]."
"5.27. Subd. 4. Late Penalty. If the license for a dog or cat is
obtained while the dog or cat is impounded by the city, or after the
required license period has commenced, there shall be added to the
regular license fee a late - license penalty as provided in A
ppendix D of
this Code [of an additional $5.00] for each such animal; provided that
any owner who acquires a dog or cat after the start of the license year,
or any owner who has a dog or cat at the time of becoming a resident
of the city, shall be allowed thirty days to secure a license, without
incurring the late- license penalty provided in this subdivision."
"5.27. Subd. 8. Replacement of Lost Tag. If any such tag is lost or
stolen, the owner may obtain a new tag by surrendering the receipt for
the first tag and by paying the charge for a duplicate license as
vided in Appendix D of this Code pro-
-- [sum of $.50]."
-27-
115.27. Subd. 18. Redemption of Animals. Any dog or cat may be redeemed
from the pound by the owner upon paying the following [fees and charges]:
(1) The license fee for the animal, if the license has not
previously been obtained.
(2) The late- license penalty, where a license has not been
obtained within the time provided in this section.
(3) The amount of the boarding fee which the city is required
to pay to the pound keeper.
(4) An impounding penalty as provided in Appendix D of this Code
[of $5.00 if it is the second time that the animal has been im-
pounded for a violation of this section; a penalty of $10.00 if
it is the third time; and a penalty of $15.00 if it is the fourth
time]."
XXXII. Chapter V, Part III, Section 5.28 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to kennel licenses is hereby amended by amending Subdivision
6 thereof to read as follows:
"5.28. Subd. 6. License Fees. The fee for a commercial kennel license
[is $50.00 per year or any fraction thereof.] and the fee for a residential
kennel license are as provided in Appendix D of this Code [is $10.00 per
year or any fraction thereof]. The residential kennel license fee is in
addition to the usual animal license fees provided in this chapter."
XXXIII. Chapter V, Part III, Section 5.29 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield regulating the sale of firearms is hereby amended by amending Subdi-
vision 4 thereof to read as follows:
"5.29. Subd. 4. License Fee. The annual license fee is as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$1.00]."
XXXIV. Chapter V, Part III, Section 5.30 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with fortune tellers and related trades is hereby amended by
amending Subdivision 4 thereof to read as follows:
"5.30. Subd. 4. License Fees. The license fees are as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [follows: for one day - $10.00; for one week
- $25.00; for one month - $50.00; for one year - $300.001."
XXXV. Chapter V, Part IV, Section 5.34 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with the regulation of bicycles is hereby amended by amending
Subdivisons 3 and 10 thereof to read as follows:
't5.34. Subd. 3. License Fee. The license fee is as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$2.00 for the entire period of the license
provided in Subdivision 4]."
"5.34. Subd. 10. Replacement of Lost License or Registration_. Upon
application and satisfactory evidence of loss of a license or regis-
tration card and the payment of a [$.75] fee as provided in Appendix
D of this Code, the License Division shall issue a duplicate replacement
license [plate] or card."
XXXVI. Chapter V, Part IV, Section 5.35 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield relating to the licensing of aircraft is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 3 thereof to read as follows:
115.35. Subd. 3. License Fee. The application shall be accompanied
by a license fee which is as provided in Appendix D of this Code
[$25.00 for each day for which the license is sought]."
_40-
XXXVII. Chapter VI, Section 6.01 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating restaurants, food establishments and food vending machines is hereby
amended by amending Subdivision 9 thereof to read as follows:
116.01. Subd. 9. License Fees. Fees for licenses issued hereunder are
as provided in Appendix D of this Code [follows:
(1) Food establishment: $25.00 per annum plus $5.00 for each
additional facility on the same premises, as set forth above
with respect to food establishments.
(2) Itinerant food establishment:, $15.00 per annum.
(3) Retail candy shop: $25.00 per annum, plus $5.00 for each
additional facility on the same premises, as set forth above
with respect to food establishments.
(4) Readily - perishable food vehicle: $5.00 per annum, providing
that a "fleet vehicle" license for more than one readily- perishable
food vehicle may be issued, and the annual fleet vehicle license
fee is $15.00 per annum.
(5) Baker food vehicle: $15.00 per annum.
(6) Catering food vehicle: $100.00 per annum, plus $5.00 per
annum for each additional catering food vehicle under the same
ownership and operation.
(7) Vending machine: For each machine dispensing food, and re-
quiring a coin or token, $5.0 per annum; for all other machines,
$5.00 per annum for the first food dispensing unit of the machine,
and $5.00 per annum for each additional food dispensing unit of
the same machine, but not to exceed $50.00 for any one machine.
The license fee for ice vending machines if $10.00 each]."
XXXVIII. Chapter VI, Section 6.03 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to the regulation and maintenance of wells is hereby amended by amending
Subdivisions 4 and 7 thereof to read as follows:
"6.03. Subd. 4. License Fee. The application shall be accompanied
by the license fee [which is] as provided in Appendix D of this Code
[$25,00 per year or any fraction thereof]. Licenses expire on
December 31 next following the date of their issuance."
"Subd. 7. Permit and Fees. No person, firm or corporation shall drill
any well or repair any existing well without first obtaining a permit to
do so. Application for such a permit shall be made in writing to the
chief inspector and shall state the character, location and size of the
proposed well and shall be accompanied by the permit fee [which is]
as provided in Appendix D of this Code [follows:
2"
casing
$4.00
3"
casing
$6.00
4"
casing
$8.00
5"
casing
$10.00
6"
casing
$12.00
8"
casing
$16.00
10"
casing
$20.00
The minimum permit fee for the repair of any well is $4.001.
-29-
0
XXXIX. Chapter VI, Section 6.04 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to autmobile washing establishments is hereby amended by amending Subd -
division 16 thereof to read as follows:
"6.04. Subd. 16. License Fee. Licenses for such business shall
be on a calendar year basis. The annual license fee is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [$25.00]. The license fee for part of
a calendar year is the same as for a full year."
XXXX. Chapter VI, Section 6.05 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating scavengers is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 5 and 8 thereof
to read as follows
"6.05. Subd. 5. Permit for Dumping, In the event that a cesspool
must be opened in order to remove the contents of the same, or the
contents thereof dumped in a city sewer, a permit must first be
secured from the chief inspector, and a fee as provided in Appendix
D of this Code [of $1.001 shall be paid for such permit."
"Subd. 8. License Fee. The fee for such license is as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$20.00 per vehicle per year or fractional
part thereof]. Licenses expire on December 31 next following the
date when they become effective."
XXXXI. Chapter VI, Section 6.60 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating garbage and refuse hauling is hereby amended by amending Subdivision
10, Paragraph (1) and Subdivision 17, Paragraph (2) thereof to read as follows:
"6.60. Subd. 10 (1). License Fees. The annual license fee is as
provided in Appendix D of this Code [$25.00 for the first vehicle and
$10.00 for each additional vehicle in the business of garbage and
refuse hauling within the city] ."
"6.06. Subd. 17 (2). The application shall be accompanied by the
annual license fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code [which
will be the sum of $5.001."
XXXXII. Chapter VI, Section 6.07 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating automobile dealers is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 5 thereof
to read as follows:
"6.07. Subd. 5. License Fee. The annual license fee is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [for licenses for the first place of
business owned and operated by the licensee is $50.00. The license
fee for each additional establishment operated by the same licensee
is $15.001."
XXXXIII. Chapter VI, Section 6.08 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating motor bicycle businesses is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 5
thereof to read as follows:
"6.08. Subd. 5. License Fee. The annual license fee is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [$50.00 for a license to sell motor bicycles
and $75.00 for a license to sell, rent or lease motor bicycles, which]
The fee shall be deposited in the general revenue fund of the city. A
separate license shall be obtained for each place of business. The
licensee shall display the license in a prominent place on the premises."
- 30 -'
XMIV. Chapter VI, Section 6.11 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to the sale and dispensation of tobacco is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 3 thereof to read as follows:
"6.11. Subd. 3. License Fees. The fee for such license is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [$12.00 per year. Notwithstanding the pro-
visions of Section 5.12 of Chapter V, licenses are issued for a term of
less than one year and fees are computed at the rate of $1.00 for each
month or fraction thereof]."
XXXXV. Chapter VI, Section 6.12 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to the sale and distribution of milk products is hereby repealed.
XXXXVI. Chapter VI, Section 6.13 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the sale of soft drinks is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 4
thereof to read as follows:
"6.11-3. Subd. 4. License Fee. The license fee is as provided in Appendix
D of this Code [$5.00 per year]."
XXXXVII. Chapter VI, Section 6.14 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the use of sound trucks is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 5
thereof to read as follows:
"6.14. Subd. 5. License Fees. Licenses shall. be issued either on an
annual basis or for a specified number of days. The [annual] license
fee for each vehicle is as provided in Appendix D of this Code
[$50.00. The daily license tee for each vehicle is $3.00 for the first
day and $1.00 for each additional day]."
XXXXVIII. Chapter VI, Section 6.15 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield regulating transient merchants is hereby amended by amending Sub-
division 5 thereof to read as follows:
"6.15. Subd. 5. License Fee. The license fee is as provided in Appendix
D of this Code [of $10.00 for each day which the applicant intends to do
business]."
XXXXIX. Chapter VI, Section 6.16 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating wagon peddlers is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 4 thereof_ to
read as follows:
"6.16. Subd. 4. License Fee. There shall be an annual license fee
as provided by Appendix D of this Code [of $50.00] which shall accompany
the application."
L. Chapter VI, Section 6.17 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating peddlers, dealers, hawkers, solicitors and canvassers is hereby
amended by amending Subdivision 3 thereof to read as follows:
"6.17. Subd. 3. Registration Fee. There is a registration fee as
provided in Appendix D of this Code [of $3.001 for such person
registering in accordance with this section."
•31-
LI. Chapter VI, Section 6.18 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the sale of Christmas trees is hereby amended by amending Sub-
division 4 thereof to read as follows:
"6.18. Subd. 4. License Fee. The annual fee for the licensing herein
required is as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$25.00 per year]
which sum accompanies the application for such license."
LII. Chapter VI, Section 6.19 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to motels is hereby amended by amending Subdivisions 5 and 10 thereof
to read as follows:
116.19. Subd. 5. License Fees. License fees are as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [follows: For the first lodging unit -
$5.00; for each additional single lodging unit - $2.501."
"Subd. 10. Period of Residence; Permit Fee. No person shall be per-
mitted to reside in any lodging unit for a period of longer than six
months from the date of his first registration in the motel without
first obtaining a permit from the council. Such permit may be issued
for a fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code [of $1.00]. If the
council grants the permit, it may specify the length of time for
which the permit is granted. No person is permitted to reside in any
lodging unit for a longer period than that specified in the permit
unless a new permit is obtained."
LIII. Chapter VI, Section 6.20 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
dealing with the licensing of taxicabs is hereby amended by amending Subdivision
4 thereof to read as follows:
"6720. Subd. 4. License Fees. The annual license fee is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [$20.00 for the first taxicab or auto livery
and $10.00 for each additional taxicab or auto livery operated at any
time within the licensing period]."
LIV. Chapter VI, Section 6.21 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
dealing with the licensing of taxicab drivers is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 6 thereof to read as follows:
"6.21. Subd. 6. License Fee. The annual license fee is as provided
in Appendix D of this Code [$5.00]."
LV. Chapter VI, Section 6.22 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the rental of utility trailers and trucks is hereby amended by
amending Subdivision 4 thereof to read as follows:
116.22. Subd. 4. License Fee and License Year. The annual license fee
is as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$25.00]. A separate license
shall be obtained for each place of business. The licensee shall dis-
play the license on a prominent place on the premises licensed. A
license, unless revoked, is for the calendar year, or part thereof,
for which it has been issued."
-32-
LVI. Chapter VI, Section 6.23 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
dealing with outdoor merchandising and storage is hereby amended by amending
Subdivision 7 thereof to read as follows:
"Subd. 7. Outside Merchandising: Permanent Outdoor Displays.
Permits. Permanent outdoor displays may not be constructed unless
a permit therefor is issued under this section. [Permanent outdoor
displays existing on the effective date of this ordinance shall ob-
tain a permit by December 31, 1974.1 The owner, or manager of a
business or commercial use or their authorized representative may
make application to the Chief Inspector on forms provided by him.
The application shall be accompanied by a fee as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [of $10.00,1 and a sketch plan necessary
to enable the inspector to insure compliance with this section.
If the Chief Inspector finds that the proposed display conforms
to the standards of Subdivision 6 and other applicable provisions
of this Code he shall issue the permit."
LVII. Chapter VIII, Part I, Section_ 8.03 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with building sewers and connections is hereby amended by
amending Subdivision 6 thereof to read as follows:
"8.03. Subd. 6. Permit and Inspection Fees. A permit and inspection
fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code [of $7.50 for a residential
or commerical building sewer permit and $15.00 for an industrial
building sewer permit] shall be paid to the city treasurer at the time
the application is filed."
LVIII. Chapter X, Part Ii, Section 10.05 of the Ordinance Code of the City
of Richfield dealing with maintenance of fowl and birds is hereby amended
by amending Subdivision 5, Paragraph (4) thereof to read as follows:
"10.05. Subd. 5. (4). The annual license fee is as rovided in
Appendix D of this Code [$5.00 per pigeon loft]. The license year
shall be from April 1 to March 31 of the succeeding year."
LIX. Chapter X, Part II, Section 10.06 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield dealing with the maintenance of non - domestic animals is hereby
amended by amending Subdivision 4 thereof to read as follows:
"10.06. Subd. 4. Temporary Permits. The city council may grant
temporary permits, for a period not to exceed 60 days, for the keeping
of any non - domestic animals for use in connection with an exhibition
or seasonal display thereof, provided that the council finds that such
animals are not likely to be dangerous; that they will be kept in safe
and sanitary surroundings; that they will not be maintained in an in-
humane manner or be subjected to inhumane treatment; and that their
presence on the - premises will not be a source of nuisance or annoyance
to the occupants of adjacent property. In granting such permit the
council may impose limitations upon the permit to insure that such
animals will be kept under such conditions. It shall be unlawful for
any person having such a permit to keep such animals without maintaining
such conditions or without abiding by the limitations imposed by the
city council. Any such permit shall be subject to immediate suspension
by the city manager if he determines that such animals constitute a
safety or sanitary hazard, are being subjected to inhumane treatment
or conditions, or are a source of nuisance, and such suspension shall
-33-
remain in effect until the next subsequent meeting of the city council.
At such meeting the city council may revoke such permit or may rein-
state the same subject to such limitations as the council shall deem
necessary. The permit fee for any such permit shall be as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$15.00]."
LX. Chapter XI, Section 11.02 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the sale and dispensation of nonintoxicating malt liquor is hereby
amended by amending Subdivision 6 thereof to read as follows:
"11.02. Subd. 6. License Fees. The annual license fees are as
provided in Appendix D of this Code [follows:
On -sale license
$200.00
Tavern license
$300.00
Wholesale license
$ 10.00
Off -sale license
$ 25.00
Club
$100.00)."
LXI. Chapter XI, Section 11.03 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the sale of set -ups for consumption of liquor is hereby amended by
amending Subdivisions 9, 10 and 20, paragraph (3) thereof to read as follows:
"11.03. Subd. 9. License Fees. The following provisions control
as to license fees and related subjects:
(1) The annual license fee for a "set -up" license shall be
as provided in Appendix D of this Code [the maximum provided
by state law].
(2) The annual license fee shall be paid before the appli-
cation is accepted. Upon rejection of any application for a
license, the license fee shall be refunded to the applicant
except where rejection is for a willful misstatement in the
in the license application.
(3) At the time of each original application for a license,
the applicant shall also pay in full an investigation fee
as provided in Appendix D of this Code. [For a single natural
person, the investigating fee shall be $75.00. For a partner-
ship, the investigating fee shall be $150.00. For a corporation
or other association, the investigating fee shall be $300.00.1
No investigating fee shall be refunded.
(4) No part of the fee paid for any license shall be refunded
except in accordance with this section or with city council
action.
(5) At any time that an additional investigation is required
because of a change in the ownership or control of a corpo-
reation or because of enlargement, alteration or extension of
premises previously licensed, the licensee shall pay an
additional investigating fee as provided in Appendix D of this
Code [in the amount of $50.00]."
-34-
Subd. 10. Permit Fee for Consumption or Display. In addition to any
other fees imposed by this chapter or by the state each person having
obtained a permit for the consumption or display of intoxicating
liquor from the State of Minnesota, pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes 340.14, Subdivsion 3, shall pay a permit fee as
provided in Appendix D of this Code [of $100.001. This provision is
based upon authority granted in Minnesota Statutes, 340.13, 3 (c)."
Subd. 2.0. (3). The annual set -up license fee for any such person
shall be as provided_ in Appendix D of this Code [$5.00] and shall
be paid in advance. A license shall expire on ,Tune 30th next
following its effective date."
LXII. Chapter XI, Section 11.06 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
regulating the on -sale of intoxicating liquor is hereby amended by amending
Subdivisions 8 and 20, paragraph (3) thereof to read as follows:
"11.06. Subd. 8. License Fees. The following provisions control as to
license fees and related subjects:
(1) The annual license fee for an on -sale license shall be as
established in Appendix D of this Code [seven thousand five
hundred dollars. ($7,500.00)].
(2) At the time of each original application for a license,
one -half the annual license fee shall be paid when the appli-
cation is filed and the remaining balance shall be paid before
the license is issued. At the time of renewal of a license,
the total annual license fee shall be paid when the application
is filed. All licenses expire on December 31 of each year.
When an origianl license is issued for a portion of a year the
license fee shall be prorated at the rate of one - twelfth
of the annual license fee [$625.00]per month or portion of a
month remaining in the license year. All fees shall be paid
into the general fund of the city. Upon rejection or withdrawal
of any application for a license, the license fee shall be re-
funded to the applicant except where rejection or withdrawal is
for a willful misstatement in the license application.
(3) At the time of each original application for a license,
the applicant shall also pay an [minimum] investigating fee as
provided in Appendix D of this Code. [This minimum fee shall
be One- Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each person shown on the
application, whether a proprietor, partner, manager, shareholder
or officer.] The [minimum] investigating fee shall not be sub-
ject to refund. If the expenses of the investigation relating
to any application exceed the [minimum] investigating fee paid,
the city shall notify the applicant of this fact and shall re-
quire the applicant to pay an additional investigating fee as
Provided in Appendix D of this Code which the city manager deems
necessary to complete its investigation of the applicant. The
applicant shall pay such an additional investigating fee within
five (5) days of being so notified. If such additional investi-
gating fee is not paid within such 5 -day period, the city shall
discontinue consideration of the application.
(4) No part of the fee paid for any license shall be refunded
-35-
except in accordance with this section or with city council action.
(5) At any time that an additional investigation is required be-
cause of a change in the ownership, interest or control of a partner-
ship or a corporation, the licensee shall pay an additional
investigative fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code [in the
amount of $100.00 per each individual involved in the change who was
not listed on the original or renewal application]."
"11.06. Subd. 20. (3). The annual [on -sale] license fee for any
such person shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code [$5.00]
and shall be paid in advance. A license shall expire on June 30th
next following its effective date."
LXIII. Chapter XI, Section 11.07 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
relating to Sunday liquor sales is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 3
thereof to read as follows:
"11.07. Subd. 3. Term; Fee. Such special license may be issued by the
city council for a license year coextensive with the license year of
the on -sale liquor license of such establishment. In no event shall
such a license be for a period of more than twelve months. The fee for
such special license for any license year shall be as provided in
Appendix D of this Code [$200.00]. A special Sunday license is not
an additional license within the meaning of Section 11.06, Subdi-
vision 2."
LXIV. Chapter XII, Part I, Section 12.04 of the Ordinance Code of the City
of Richfield relating to street vacations is hereby amended by adding thereto
Subdivision 5 to read as follows:
"12.04. Subd. 5. Petition -Fee. The petition for vacation of any
street, alley public grounds o_ r Dart thereof shall be accompanied
by the'fee provided in Appendix D of this Code."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this
day of , 1977.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
{r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 361
Agenda November 8, 1976
Subject: Proposed Change in Construction Permit lees
The purpose of this council letter is to propose revisions in Inspection
Division permit fees.
History
One of the responsibilities of the Inspection Division is to enforce
various state laws and city ordinances governing the construction, alterations
and repairs of buildings located wi.tnin Richfield. One of the major requirements
of these laws and ordinances is the issuance and inspection of perniitS rc�:Iat'ed
to the construction, alteration and repair of the building. Tile fees for these
permits have not been changed since 1967. During the 1977 city budget hear-
ings the staff indicated that it would be submitting recommendations to adjust
various fee schedules in order to bring the fees in line with the services
received.
Construction Permits
Building, electrical, plumbing, heating and electrical permits are issued
for work: done on specific buildings. The costs incurred by the city in issuing
and inspecting for these permits are costs incurred in protecting and benefiting
individuals. For example, an electrical permit issued for electrical work, on
John Doe's property insures, through the inspection process, that the elect fi.ca;
work done on Mr. Doe's property is done in a safe, acceptable manner. Mr.
Doe is the one whc.> is protected and benefitted. For this reason it is logical
that the permit fee }.-paid by Mr. Doe or his contractor should cover the costs
incurred by the city in providing him with this service.
In preparing a proposed revised fee schedule the staff has attempted to
construct: a fee schedule that will reflect the costs incurred by the city in
issuing and inspecting for permits. The city staff does recognize, however,
that certain functions performed by the inspection division are of an overall
community benefit. Comnl.aints and advisory inspections, code enforcement-
` , Council Letter No. 361 -2- November 8, _1976
programs, etc. benefit the entire community and it is reasonable to have the
community support these types of activities. In preparing a revised schedule
the staff anticipated that approximately 75% of the cost of the inspection div-
ision budget should be financed by fees and 25% by the general fund.
Proposed Fees:
In preparing a proposed revised fee schedule the staff has attempted
to accomplish the following two objectives:
1. A permit fee schedule that will equate fees with
costs incurred by the city.
2. A simplified format that will be easily understood
by those obtaining permits.
The proposed fees are shown on white paper and attached to this council letter.
The existing fees are reproduced on pink paper and are also attached. Tt is
anticipated that the proposed fees would generate an estimated $65,000 to
$70, 000 in revenue during the first full year that the fees are in effect. This
revenue estimate is essentially equal to 75% of the expenditures in the in-
spection division budget. The public works cirector has prepared a present-
ation for the November. 8 city council meeting to review the fee proposal and
demonstrate the differences between existing fees and those which have been
proposed.
Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the public works director in which I concur,
that the city council approve the proposed schedule and request the city attorney
to prepare the appropriate ordinance amendments to implement the fees in 1977.
Respectfully sub fitted,
( I "'� ,.�i.
It
vu
, p
WaWayne S ur as �
y B ggr ff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
Finance Director
City Attorney
MOVING OF BUILDINGS
` WEL',ING
Pre- -inspection .
In Richfield
Outside Richfield
Moving Permit;
Within Richfield
Outside Richfield
GifflAGES
Pre- inspection
Moving
HOUSII:G INSPECTION FEE
FEE
$25
$50
$25
$50
$15
$1.0 1st stall plus $5 for
each additional stall
,. O •J
Housing Inspection Fee $4o
This fee should apply to each inspection when:
Seller calls for minimwn housing inspection.
Home oi•mer calls for minimum housing inspection.
House industry calls for minimum housing inspection.
Government agencies call for miniraun housi.n'sy inspection.
Private lending institution calls for minimum housing inspection.
WRECKING OF STRUCTURES
One and two -story single unit dwelling
Multiple dwelling
Residential garages and other lesser
structures
$10
$10 for first unit plus $5 for
each unit thereafter
$5
TO`.r!?L VALUATION
$50 to $1,000
$1,001 to $2,000
$2,001 to $50,000
$50,0o1 to $loo,000
$100,001 to $500,000
$500,001 and up
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
FEE
$15
$15 for first $1,000 plus $1 for each
additional $100 -- or fraction thereof
to $2,000
$25 for first $2,000 plus $3 for each
additional $1,000 - or fraction there-
of
$109 for first $40,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1,000 - or fraction
thereof to $100,000
$234 for first $100,000 plus $2 for
each additional $1,000 - or fraction
thereof to $500,000
$1,03h for first $500,000 plus $1 for
each additional $1,000 - or fraction
thereof
PLAN CHECKING G 1' EE
50% of the building perini.t fee. Exceptions:
1) Existing single family dwelling alterations
when habitable area is not increased.
2) Single and two family repair and maintenance
work.
3) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance
work not exceeding $1,000.
SWIMMING POOLS
Pools of' 24" in depth or less and
not exceeding 15' in diameter
New above or below ground permanent
pools
Erection of portable pools
No permit
Based on building permit
$10
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
A) RESIDENTIAL
1) Minimum fee
2) Fee per fixture, including:
Bath tub
Bidet
Clothes dryer
Dishwasher
Disposal
Floor drain
Floor trap
Laundry tray
Lavatory
Sewage - e j e ctor
Shower stall
Sink
Water closet
Water heater, gas
Water heater, electric,
new or replacement
3) Gas piping, per unit, including:
Clothes dryer
Grill
Incinerator (up to 99,000 BTU)
Light
Oven
Plate
Stove
Water heater (up to 99,000 BTU)
$10.00
$ 5.00
$ 5.00
4) Lawn sprinkler, anti - syphon system (includes water $14.00
connection from building piping to yard side of
syphon breaker)
5) Pool heater (up to 199,000 BTU)
6) Water softener
7) Water supply or distribution piping extension
or alteration
B) COMMERCIAL
1) Minimum fee
2) Fee per fixture, including:
Bidet
Disposer
))rinking fountain
Floor drain or trap
Plaster interceptor
Sinks: Bradley -type wash -up, service,
flat -rim, bar, counter, laboratory, pot
or scullery
Urinal
Any fixture not lasted above.
$28.00
$ 6.00
$ 6.00
$20.00
$ 5.00
FEE
0
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
(Continued)
B) COMMERCIAL (Continued)
FEE
3) Clothes washer
a) First 5 units or less $15.00
b) Each additional unit $ 4.00
4) Dental chair $25.00
5) Dishwasher $10.00
6) Flammable waste trap, catch basin $10.00
7) Food cold case condensate lines, each unit $ 5.00
8) Ground run, new for existing building $12.00
9) Ice - making machines. $ 5.00
10) Indirect coil for hot water storage $10.00
11) Lawn sprinkler, anti - syphon system (includes $25.00
water connection from building piping to
yard side of syphon breaker)
12) Neutralizing tank $10.00
13) Rainwater leader:
a) A11 stacks 10 stories or less $10.00
- b) All stacks over 10 stories $15.00
13) Roof area drain $ 5.00
14) Sewage ejector $10.00
3-5) Shower, gang -type per head $ 3.00
16) Water softener $10.00
17) Water supply or distribution piping, $15.00
extension or alteration
18) Installation of gas piping
a) Up to 2 inches in diameter
1) First 3 openings $ 3.50
2) Each additional opening $ 1.50
- 2 -
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
(Continued)
B) COMMERCIAL (Continued)
FEE
18) Installation of gas piping (Continued)
b) Exceeding 2 inches in diameter
1)
First
3 openings
$10.00
2)
Each
additional opening
$ 2.00
C) GAS INSTALLATION
1) For the installation of any gas unit including
but not limited to:
Water heaters
Enameling ovens
Retorts
Steam generators for process use
Ranges
Deep fryers
Dryers
Process gas - burning devices
Any similar gas - burning devices
the fee shall be determined per BTU gas input:
a)
Not exceeding 99,000 BTU
$ 7.00
b)
100,000 but not exceeding 199,000 BTU
$12.00
c)
200,000 but not exceeding 399,000 BTU
$2+.00
d)
400,000 but not exceeding 599,000 BTU
$36.00
e)
600,000 but not exceeding 999,000
$48.00
f)
1,000,000 but not exceeding 2,499,000 BTU
$80.00
g)
2,500,000 but not exceeding 9 ,999,000 BTU
$96.00
h)
10,000,000 but not exceeding 49,999,000 BTU
$140.00
i)
50,009,000 but not exceeding 7+,999,000 BTU
$180.00
J)
75,000,000 and over
$20.00
- 3
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Continued)
D) Wells.
1) 2 - inch well
3 - inch well
4 - inch well
5 -- inch well or larger
- 4 -
$ 7.00
$10.00
$15.00
$25.00
FEE
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
A) Residential Buildings
1) Minimum fee
2) Complete wiring fee (new construction)
a) Single family residence
b) Two- family residence
3} New Service up to
4) Temporary service for construction
5) Installation (or replacements) of
major appliances after completion
of building
6) Swimming pools
7) Wiring of residential garage
8) Wiring of Addition
a) First room
b) Each additional room
9 ) Rewiring
a) First room
b) Each additional room
.B) Multiple Dwelling over 'L; 7o- Family
1) Minimum fee
2)' Complete wiring fee
a) 1 to 5 units
b) 6 to 12 units
c) 13 to 22 units
d) Over 22 units
FEE
$10.00
$35.00
$65.00
$ 7.50
$1.0.00
$ 3.00 each
$15.00
$ 7.50
$ 7.50
$ 2.50
$ 7.50
$ 2.50
$10.00
$70.00
$70.00 + $14.00 /unit over 5
$168.00 + $12.00 /unit over 12
$288.00 + $10.00 /unit over 22
ELEC`.PRICAL PERMIT FEES
(Continued)
B) Multiple Dwelling over Two - Family (Cont'd.)
3) Wiring of Garages
4) Temporary Service for construction
5) Swimming Pools
6) Rewiring
a) First unit
b) Each additional unit
FEE
$15.00 first stall plus $1.00 /stall
for each additional stall.
$10.00
$35.00
$10.00
$ 5.00
C) Commercial and Industrial '
1) Schedule of fees based on the cost of
electrical job to the customer:
a) First $100.00 or fraction thereof $10.00
b) $101.00 to $50,000.00 if of cost
c) Over $50,000.00 $500..00 + 3/4% of cost over $50,000
Upon completion of the job, the electrical contractor will furnish
the city with a notarized statement of the full cost of the job to
the customer
2) Temporary services for const-,•uction:
a) 0 - 100 amp $10.00
b) Over 100 amp $20.00
D) Signs
1) Schedule of fees based on the cost of
electrical job to the customer:
a) First $100.00 or fraction thereof $10.00
b) $101.00 to $50,000 1% of cost
- 2 -
E) Fire Alarm Systems.
F.
ELECTRICAL, PERVIT FEES
(Continued)
1)
For the installation of fire a1rrm
systems connected to the Municipal
Fire Alarm System for:
a) 1 to 5 stations
$
5.00
b) For each additional group of
$
5.00
'10 stations or fraction thereof
(provided that the total fee
shall not exceed $40.00)
Telephone
Booths.
1)
Wiring of booth
$
5.00
2)
For each sign installed on exterior
$
3.00
of booth
- 3 -
FEE
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION FEE
$50 to $1,000 $15
$1,001 to $2,000 $15 for first $1,000 plus $1 for each
additional $100 - or fraction thereof
to $2,000
$2,001 to
$50,000
$25 for first $2,000 plus $3
for each
additional $1,000 - or fraction
there-
of
$50,001 to
$100,000
$109 for first $40,000 plus
$2.50 for
each additional $1,000 - or
fraction
thereof to $100,000
$100,001
to $500,000
$234 for first $100,000 plus
$2 for
each additional $1,000 - or
fraction
thereof to $500,000
$500,001
and up
$1,03+ for first $500,000 plus
$1 for
each additional $1,000 - or
fraction
thereof
PLAN CHECKING FEE
50% of the building permit fee. Exceptions:
1) Existing single family dwelling alterations
when habitable area is not increased.
2) Single and two family repair and maintenance
work.
3) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance
work not exceeding $1,000.
SWIRAING POOLS
Pools of 24" in depth or less and
not exceeding 15' in diameter
New above or below ground permanent
pools
Erection of portable pools
No permit
Based on: building permit
$10
MOVING OF BUILDINGS
DWELLING
pre- inspection
In Richfield
Outside Richfield
Moving Permit
Within Richfield
Outside Richfield
GARAGES
pre- inspection
Moving
HOUSING INSPECTION FEE
FEE
$25
$50
$25
$50
$15
$10 lst stall plus $5 for
each additional stall
Housing Inspection Fee $40 for first unit plus $5.00 eac-
additional unit.
This fee should apply to each inspection when:
Seller calls for minimum housing inspection.
Home owner calls for minimum housing inspection.
House industry calls for minimum housing inspection.
Government agencies call for minimum housing inspection.
Private lending institution calls for minimum housing inspection.
WRECKING OF STRUCTURES
One and two -story single unit dwelling
Multiple dwelling
Residential garages and other lesser
structures
- 2 -
$10
$10 for first unit plus $5 for
each unit thereafter
$5
Fees
HEATING, VENTILATING, AIR CONDITIONING,
REFRIGERATION FEES
Central Systems
Additions, alterations and repairs
Furnace or boiler replacement
Addition of air conditioning to
existing heating system.
Ventilation and Exhaust Systems
Ventilation & exhaust systems
installed with central system
Ventilation & exhaust systems with
"small type" (up to 200 CFM) exhaust
fans
Gas and Oil Permits
Gas & oil permits (input up to
500,000 B.T.U.) installation or
replacement of conversion burner,
unit heater, floor furnace, wall
heater, spaceheater
Gas & oil permits (exceeding input
of 500,000) (same as abpve)
Gas piping
Maximum Gas or Oil permit
14% of estimated cost with
a minimum of $20.00.
14% of estimated cost with
a minimum of $5.00.
V-,,% of estimated cost with
a minimum of $10.00.
14% of estimated cost with
a minimum of $15.00.
14% of estimated cost with
a minimum fee of $5.00.
$5.00 per occupancy, rental
unit or residence.
$5.00 per unit installed.
4% of estimated cost with
a minimum of $10.00.
$1.50 per unit, 1 - 5 units,
$.50 each additional unit
$5.00
Conversion
Conversion from L. P. to natural gas $2.00 each space heating unit,
$1.00 each minor appliance
(Fees include piping). Minimum
fee shall be $5.00.
— 2 —
Process Ecj, ment
Process Equipment
( Installation of any steam, hot
water, or warm air system
fired with gas or oil used in
connection with process
application)
Storage Tanks
14% of estimated cost with
a minimum of $10.00
Fuel storage tanks (underground or $5.00 per tank to 1000 gal.
enclosed). Installation to be used $10.00 per tank exceeding
with oil burner only 1000 gallons
Fuel storage tanks (above ground/ $3.00 per tank
not enclosed). Installation to be
used with oil burner only
Other tanks - (above and below $15.00 each above ground tank.
ground tanks). Installation, $50.00 each below ground tank.
modification, removal, abandonment. $7.50 for installation or
alteration of piping.
Stokers and powdered fuel burners
Stoker and /or powdered fuel burners
Installation
Electrical Heating
Electric Heating System (central
type). Installation.
Electric unit and infra -red
(Radiant) heater
Electrical cabinet, thru -wall
heating or cooling unit.
1% of estimated job cost
Minimum fee of $10.00
14% of estimated cost with a
$10.00 minimum
$5.00 first unit.
$3.00 each additional unit.
Electrical baseboard'.radiation unit $5.00 first KW.
$2.00 each additional 3 KW
portion thereof.
Engineering /heat -loss calculations $5.00 filing fee
Refrigeration Equipment
Installation of any refrigeration
system (portable excluded).
Up to 3 horsepower $6.00 per system.
3 HP and up to 15 HP $10.00 per system.
15 HP and up to 50 HP $25.00
Over 50 }HP $50.00
- 3 -
Refr_ igeration Ec�ui�ment (Continued)
Refrigeration systems, additions,
alterations, repairs
Propane Storage
Non- portable propane or L.P. or
L.P. storage facility.
Installation, alteration,
modification, relocation or
replacement.
14f of estimated cost with
a minimum of $5.00
$15.00 each tank.
$7.50 each vaporizer
$7.50 gas piping
TOTl.,L. VALUATION .~ TOTAL VALUATION
1.00
to
500.00
5.00
500.01
to
000.00
6.00
D 600,01
to
700.00
7.00
10.01
to
800.,00
8.00
X0.01
to
900.00
9.00
900,01
to
1,000.00
10.00
1,000.01
to
1,100.00
11.00
11100.01
to
1,200.00
12.00
1,200.01.
to
1,300.00
13.00
1,300.01
to
1,400.00
.14.00
- 1,400.01
to
1,500.00,
15.00
1,500.01
to
1,600.00
16.00
1,600.01
to
1,700.00
17.00
- .1,700.01
to
1,800.00
18.00
-1,800.01
to
1,900.00
19.00
1,900.01_
to
2,000.00
.20.00
2,060.01
to
3,000.00
23.00
3,000.01
to
4,000.00
26.00
4,000.01
to
5,000.00
29.00
5,000.01
to
6,000.00
32.00
6,000.01
to
7,000.00
35.00
7,000.01
to
8,000.00
38.00
8,000, 01.
to
9,000.00
41.00
9,000.01
to
10,000.00
44.00
10,000,01
to
11,000.00
47.00
11,000.01
to
12,000.00
50.00
✓12,000.01
to
13,000.00
53.00
90.01
to
14;000.00
56.00
_00.01.
to
1- 5,000.00
59.00
15,000.01
to
16,000.00
62.00
16,000.01
to
17,000.00
65.00
17,000.01
to
18,000.00
68.00
18,000.01
to
19,000.00
71.00
19,000.01
to
-20,000.00
74.00
20,000.01
to
21,000.00
77.00
21,000.01
to
22,000.00
80.00
22,000.01
to
23,000.00
83.00
23,000.01
to
24,000.00
86.00
24.000.01
to
25,000.00
89.00
25,000.01
to
26,000.00
91.50
26,000.01
to
27,000.00
94.00
27,000.01
to
28,000.00
96.50
28,000.01
to
29,000.00
99.00
29,000.01
to
30,000.00
101.50
30,000.01
to
31,000.00
104.00
31,000.Ol
to
32,000.00
106.50
32,000.01
to
33,000.00
109.00
33,000.01
to
34,000.00
111.50
34,000.01
to
35,000.00
114.00
35,000.01
to
36,000,00
116.50
36,000.01
to
37,000.00
119.00
3` 10.01
to
38,000.00
121.50
01
to
39, 000.00
124.00
000.01
to
40,000.00
126.50
411,000.01
to
41,000.00
129.00
41,000,01
to
42,000.00
131.50
42,000.01
to
43,000.00
131.00
43,000.01
to
44,000.00
136.50
A4,000.01
to
$ 45, 000.00
45,000.01
to
463,000.00
141.50
46,000.01
to
47,000.00
144.00
47,000.01
to
48,000.00
146.50
48,000.01
to
49,000.00
149.00
49,000.01
to
50,000.00
51.50
50,000.01
to
51,000.00
153.00
51,000.01
to
52,000.00
- 154.50
• 52,000.01
to
53,000.00
156.00
53,000.01-
to
54,000.00
157.50
54,000.01
to
55,000.00
159.00
55,000.01
to
56,000.00.
160.50
56,000.01
to
57,000.00
162.00
57,000.01
to
58,000.00
163.50
58,000.01
to
59,000.00
165.00
59,000.01
to
60,000.00
166.50
60,000.01
to
61,000.00
168.00
- 61,000.01
to
62,000.00
169.50
62,000.01
to
63,000.00
171.00
63,000.01
to.
64,000.00
172.50
64,000.01
to
65,000.00
174.00
65,000.01
to
66,000.00
175.50
66,000.01
to
67,000.00
177.00
67,000.01
to
68,000.00
1.78.00
68, 000.01
to'
69, 000.00.,
180,00
691000.01
to
70,000.00
181.50
70,000.01
to
71,000.00
183.00
71,000.01
to
72,000.00
184.50
72,000.01
to
73,000.00
186.00
73,000.01
to
74,000.00
187.50
74,000.01
to
75,000.00
189.00
75,000.01
to
76,000.00
1- 90.E >0
761000.01
to
77,000.00
1F•2.00
77,000.01
to
78,000.00
193.So
78,000.01
to
79,000.00
195.00
79,000.01
to
80,000.00
196.SO
80,000.01
to
81,000.00
198.00
81,000.01
to
82,000.00
199.50
823000.01
to
83,000.00
201.00
83,000.01
to
84,000.00
202.50
84,000.01
to
85,000.00
204.00
85,000.01
to
86,000.00
205.50
86,000.01
to
87,000.00
207.00
87,000.01
to
88,000.00
208.50
.88,000.01
to
89,000.00
210.00
89,000.01
to
90,000.00
211.50
90,000.01
to
91,000.00
213.00
91,000.01
to
92,000.00
215.50
92,000.01
to
93,000.00
2.16.00
93,000.01
to
94,000.00
217.50
94,000.01
to
95,000.00
219.00
95,000.01
to
96,000.00
220.50
96,000.01
to
97-,000.00
222.00
97,000.01
to
98,000.00
223.50
08,000.01
to
99,000.00
2 25.00
000,01.�1:0
1.00,000_00
226.50
$ 100,000.01
and
up $2,16.50 for
first:
$100,000
plus
$1.00 for each
additional
C1 Ilfirl -„
l „ -.mot•;
rv, t hni nnf -
HEATING & VENTILATING FEES
New Furnace (120,000 BTU)
$10.00 furnace
5.00 burner
2.00 gas line
17.00 TOTAL
Replacemer
$ 6.00
5.00
$T1---F0
2.00
$13.00
Over 120,00 BTU: Each additional 60,000 BTU is $3.00
Unit Heater: (Gas fireplace, space heater)
$ 5.00 burner
.2.00 gas line
$ 7.00 TOTAL
Air Conditioner
it Furnace (120,000 BTU)
furnace
burner
Usual fee
gas 'dine (if needed)
'Power Plant - Boiler
200,000 Btu and under
Or 6 HP $ 6.00
Each additional 100,000 3.00
Alterations or repairs:
$500 or less = $ 6.00
Ea. add. $500 = 3.00
Gas Electrical
8.00 duct�%ork etc, up to 2,000 cfm $18.00
10.00 air cond.
5.00 burner
2.00 gas line
$25.00
Each add. 1,000 cfm = $3.00
.., (Installation of cooling coils etc.)
5 Ton and under = $10.00
Each additional 22 Ton or fraction thereof = $3.00
Ventilation
2,000 cfm = $8.00
Each additional 1,000 cfm or fraction thereof = $3.00
Alterations or Repairs: Not over $500.00 = $6.00
Each add. $500.00 = 3.00
10/12/72
GAS & PLUf,1BIHG PERMITS
GAS
gas line =
$2.00
Move gas meter
= $2.00
(3 or less
openings)
Gas appliance
$3.00
•~
Not over
99,000 BTU)
14pls Gas Co.
Gas burner
(trot over
$5.00
199,000 BTU)
$3.00
light
2.00
gas line
New appliance
$5.00
$5.00
Total
Replacement
3.00
PLU14BING PERMITS
ti Water Service Permit $10.00
New fixtures $2.00 each Surtax 50
Replacements 1.50 each
Electric water heater 2.00 Sew6r permit 1 7.50
Surtax .S0
Oil water heater 3.00 S
Gas water heater 3.00 Sewer Repair $3•.00
Surtax .So
Gas appliance (replc) 3.003:so
Sewer or Water Cut -off $3.00
New appliance 5.00
no surtax
REERIGERATIOIN SYSTEM'S - 3 HP or less $ 6.00
Each additional 3 HP 3.00
Over 3 HP but"less than 15 HP = $10.00 for each system
Over 15 HP = $25.00
Over 50 HP = $5 }.00
Alterations & Repairs:
$500.00 and under $6.00
Each add. 5500 3.00
1
Location of Work:
Contractor's Name:
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Public Works Department - Protective Inspection Division
APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT
New Services Not Exceeding 200 AMP - (Amp Size
(For Larger Sizes See Fee Schedule)
Date:
Owner's Name:
Contractor's Address:
) ..............06.00 a
Outlets: Number
Installation of: 10 or less..
$3.00
11 to 20....
$6.00
each additional 10....
$1.50
S
Lighting Sockets: Number
10 or less..
02600
11 to 20....
S4.00
each additional 10....
51.25
S
Sinn Circuits: 1st circuit ... S4.00
- each additional hr. cir.....
51.0o
Electric Signs, Billboards, Outline,
1st 500 VA or 1 %atts
$S.00
Boarder, or Strip Lighting
ea. add. 100 VA
$ .20
$
Motors: Furnace #HP
1 HP or less ...........
$4.00
Air -Cond. #lip
each }]P in excess of 1
$ .25
c
Other #HP
Aux. Elect. Heat, Transformer, etc.
1 KVA or less.........
$4.00
No. of.KVA
Each KVA in excess of 1......
S .2S
S
Appliances: (Indicate number)
Ranges Dishwashers_
Coop Tops Disposals _
Wall Ovens Dryers _
First and second
Each additional
as the first and
Water Heaters
Self- Contained
Air Conditioners
appliance in each category.... $3.00 each
appliance in the same category
second appliance ............. $1.00 each
Alteration and Rcpairs and Control Work: Estimated Cost $
First $100 estimated cost..... $4.00
Each add. estimated $100...... 51.50 S
Installation of Additional Meters ................................. SI M each $
Feeders Not Exceeding 60 AMP ....... ..........................$4.00 $
(For larger sizes see fee schedule)
Grounding for Above Ground or Below Ground Swimming Pools......... $4.00 $
MISCELLANEOUS (Describe): $
STATE SURCHARGE FEE $ .50
TOTAL FEES $
Phe Undersigned agrees to do all work in conformance with City Ordinances and rulings of
Inspection Department and herewith declares that all facts and representations on this appli-
cation are true and correct. He agrees to notify the department when ready for inspection
SIGNED Telcphonc Number
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 18
Agenda January 24, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Ge. r,Uem- n:
Subject: Proposed Change in Fee Schedule
The purpose of this c,uncil letter is to propose revisions in certain fe -�s
charged by the city for specif_1 use permits, variances, zoning district changes,
hind slibdivi.Sions, of.- street parking contracts, street vacations and for planned
unit d veloUlnUnts. These changes are necessary in order to reflect the costs
the city incurs in 14-0cessing these applications.
Only a f w of the fe,_:s for these se7, ices have ever been changed. During the
1977 bvG t rl'c+i "7r1S, tie j c...f lndlcatc.7 to l it JLlt submitting reCO(nm.nOa-
tions to adjust various fee schedules in order to bring the fees in line wit^ the
services received. The city is allowed by Minnesota law to charge fees adequate
to cover the cost incurred by the city in administering the zoning ordinance.
Examples of permit costs in other metropolitan communities is attached as Exhibit
A.
City departments involved in the zoning and development process have
estimated their average time and cost below. In all cases, the fees charged are
substarltiall.y less than the cl -st of processing the average application:
lli.nd of Permit
Special Use Permit
Variance
,Smiail Zoning District Change
(one acre, or le s -s )
Large Zoning District Change
(more than one acre)
Land Division & Subdivision
Off - Street Parking Contract
Street Vacations
* Rounded to the nearest dollar
Personrn^1
Legal
Total
ExIstinn
Cost`-
Z`IOtices
Cost
roe
$138.00
$20.00
$IS8.00
$ 10.00
119.00
20.00
139.00
10.00
144.00
20.00
164.00
100.00
170.00
20.00
190.00
100.00
69.00
20.00
89.00
10.00
84.00
-0-
84.00
5.00
53.00
20.00
73.00
No Charge
yMil l�r LL LV VLIJt 1VVS J V - u -- j�a ♦u�nal u a, iJ/ /
(These figures were derived from the data contained in Exhibit B.)
There is a direct relationship between the value of the development project
and the cost to the city. Therefore, there is a diminishing relationship between
the city's processing cost and the development cost. To rn: cognize this relation-
ship, as the building or development cost increases above $1 , 000 the staff is
recommending a slidir,.g scale fee schedule. The sliding scale concept is more
equitable to the small developer. Establishment of a sliding fee schedule as
recommended, for all types of zoning applications, will better reflect the actual
amount of time spent on the application. In preparing a proposed revised fee
schedule, the staff has attempted to accomplish the following two objectives:
1. A permit fee schedule that will equate fees with costs incurred
by the city'.
2. A format that will be easily understood by those obtaining
perilits .
Special Use f'eri: its
Value of Building or Develcnment
Base fee up to and including $1,000.00
For each additional $1,000 up to $10,000
For each additional $l, 000 up to $25, 000
For each additional $1,000 exceeding $25,000
Example 1: Building Addition /$50,000
Base Fee: $75.00
+ 45.00
+ 30.00
+_25.00
Total Fee $175.00
Example 2: Group Family Day Care
Base Foe: $75.00
Variance to lor,ir:q ;lec?uir �t ents
Value of Building or Development
Base fee up to and including $1,000
!~
For each additional $1 , 000 up to $ 10, 000
For each additional $1 , 000 up to $25, 000
For each additional $1 , 000 exceeding $25, 000
Example: Variance to sideyard setback for
addition valued at $6,000
Base Fee- $50.00
+ 25.00
Total Fee $75.00
Fee
$75.00
5.00 Par 1, 000
2.00 per 1,000
1.00 per 1,000
Fee
$50.00
S. 00 per 1, 000
2.00 per 1 , 000
1.00 per 1,000
'coning District Change
Fee
Base fee up to and including one (1) acre $150.00
For each additional acre or fraction thereof up to
and including five (5) acres 20.00
For each additional acre or fraction thereof up to
and including 25 acres 10.00
Examples: All district changes of one (1) acre
or less $150.00
All district changes of five (5).acres
ar loss 230.00
one.acre at $1.50.00 = $150.00
foie- acres at $20.00 = Sit. 00
$230.00
All district changes of 2;� acres or
more 430.00
cane to five acre charge = $150.00
zou.r acres x $20, 00 80.00
iwellty acres x $10.00 200. 00
$430.00
Land Division
Waiver of preliminary platting procedures Fee
for land divisions resulting in three (3)
lots or less _ $ 25.00
Division of land requiring both Planning
Commission and City Council action resulting
in four or more lots 50.00 + $5 for each lot
Planned Unit Development
Them is 210L I!CG`;J an E : iux)li5?i d pe -!:Pi 'fee fol- re"'i :t' Of Planned Urllt deC'21Q� •-
Ments. The schedule proposed is based on the toi i review time anticipated for
pIErincd u«it de,r-alojz Bents of varying sizes, Plani ; u unit developments are only
created,by zoning district changes. Thus, the PUD schedule fee will be added to
the zoning district change schedule to arrive at a total fee.
1-2 acres $130.00
-3 acres 230.00
3 -4 acres 250.00
4 -5 acres 275.00
5 -6 acres 300.00
6+ acres 350.00
Council Letter No. 18 -4- January 24, 1977
'Example: A fee of $350.00 would be charged for
processing of a planned unit development
proposal for the Wood la ke School site
(6.2 acres)
Woodlake School site 6.2 acres
PUD fee (6+ acres) $350.00
Zoning district change fee 174.00
($150 + $24.00)
$524.00
Off_Str� _�t Parking Contract
The stpIff review of material for off - street parking agreements includes a
site plan review, drafting of plan, council presentation and contract execution.
This process tares place at the same tame as the rev.ies;v for a special us- permit
and planned unit dev elof },mient, or separately for a permitted use. When an off- -
stre- L parking plan review is cumpleted in conjunction with review for a special
use permit or PULD, tt,e cost is figured into the s?iecial use permit fee. When a
}a „rmitted use requires an off-street par'rincr contr�,:ct, it is re con mended that a flat
fee of $50. 00 be established. This will cover a13pr0_;irnatell' three- fourth:; of the
actual average cost.
Street Va ca, t i o n
There is currently no charge for this procedure. It is recommended that a fee
of $50.00 be charged to partially cover the costs associated with the street vacation
procedure.
Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the planning director, in which I concur, that the
city It
approve the proposed schedule and reatjest the city attorney to prepare
the orainanc�: arnendnnients to implen;ent the fees.
Respectfully su-)r!u /tjted,
Wayne S. Burggra a ff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
Finance-Director
City Attorney
y
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 215
Agenda July 11, 1 977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield V
o
e`ti
'er
Gentlemen:
Subject: Rezoning at 6538 Bloomington Avenue
Several months ago, the planning department received an inquiry regarding
the appropriateness of initiating a zoning district change for a parcel of land at
6538 Bloomington Avenue. At about the same time, the council requested the
staff to study the possibility of a zoning district change on the strip of land
north of 66th Street between 11th Avenue and Cedar Avenue.
The planning department has now completed its study of these requests.
In summary, the findings of the study are as follows:
1. The boundaries of the C -2 general commercial district along
66th Street, when first established, were so vaguely
described as to cause some instances of different zoning
on the same parcel of property. For example, part of the
property (13 feet wide and 130 feet deep) at 6538 Bloominton
Avenue is zoned C -2; the remaining property is zoned
single family residential. A similar situation exists on
approximately fifteen other properties on both sides of
66th Street.
2. The existing commercial land use is developed within the plat
of property lines. On the north side of 66th Street, between
13th Avenue and 16th Avenue, the east -west alley behind the
commercial uses has generally served as an obvious separation
for the commercial development to the south and residential de-
velopment to the north. Land use north of the alley, with one
exception, is single family residential. The one exception is
a single family home located on 14th Avenue which has been
converted into a TV sales and repair business. The east -west
alley does not run the full distance between. 11th Avenue and
Cedar Avenue. For the first two blocks east of 11th Avenue
and the first three blocks west of Cedar Avenue, there is no
alley. (See Exhibit A) .
Council Letter No. 215 -2- July 11, 1977
3. With the following exceptions, most of the existing land use
along 66th Street between 11th Avenue and Cedar Avenue is
commercial:
A. 15 single family homes
B. 3 multiple family structures
C. Church related property
The predominant use in the area along 66th Street is retail sales
and service with some general office, and some limited commercial.
4. The arrangement of lots, streets and alleys has encouraged
commercial and residential development, one form based on
property lines and the zoning ordinance has encouraged comm-
ercial development irrespective of the property line arrangement.
The result is intermixing land use relationships which will have
an overall detrimental effect on the zoned residential neighbor-
hoods on 66th Street, and the commercial development on 66th
Street.
Although there are several single family homes in the area, there
has not been a significant number of single family homes converted
to commercial uses. Usually the conversion from single family
homes to commercial use will create a blighting influence on the
neighborhood because of the structural differences required in
single family home construction and typical commercial construction.
5. The city's comprehensive plan indicates medium density mixed
land uses along both sides of 66th Street. It would appear, however,
that the logical terminus for this land use is the alley separation
on the north and south side of the street. This physical separation
would help create a strong open area between the single family
residential and the commercial areas on the south and north sides of
66th Street.
6. An analysis of average market value increase in the area indicates
that there is a substantial difference between the residential structures
in this area and the rest of Richfield. An analysis by area and an
analysis map is attached.
Problem Identification
This study reveals a potential land use conflict caused by the following:
1. Intermixing land uses
2. Insufficient buffering between incompatible land uses .
Council Letter No. 215 -3- July 11, 1977
3. Zoning of single family homes for commercial uses
4. Limited economic potential of businesses on 66th Street to
a threshhold higher than neighborhood convenience type
businesses
5. Strip commercial with serious curb cut and traffic congestion
problems on 66th Street
Based on these findings it is the recommendation of the planning director,
in which I concur, that the council take the following actions:
1 . Initiate rezoning of the property at 6533 Bloomington from general
commercial to single family residential t (�Ct " "- V%AV%�tU�"
2. Request the planning commission to continue the study of the
commercial and residential land uses along 66th Street from 11th
Avenue to Cedar Avenue .
Respectfully submitte ,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning Director
A v<.
RLS
I;LJ is I LJ O
F 0 0 O 11-3 -
Go D C -E70 0 0
r,
• � e15c
1s +� AVE.
0 l�
I
�
CD r-
L3 []
Q�OOmIR/4TeN
�l/(.
O
O (fj= C)
( J• o
y C�
�o CLI
o�:D Li
m rd p y Tn
cn N r.-
z ?S
— Lo
N
— t
Ul
7 RICH s
v w
? j "n •ter•} -+ r. 1`
NOKO R II S G,4 RDF'!
Os —) to tp _�}�) ti •(vd'tN.
s�
NOKOMIS 6ARDl=1%7
-i -' tD CO -4 " O) • rr
.. -,GIRA D° .
_3 1] C) ED ED
N lIv
al
17 Ft .Ave.
m � BTU 1 v O tM N
, Fj ti A v<.
_ \
.o .E mv, so--•- O ,.
�+ m
N
CEDAR
i
e
d
• d
e.
♦� Avt.
i 1 111 111l11f �
���lllr Illlr�; 11
`1111 ;I;iilr
cs���illl f i lIl
' °r�111l� �rlrlll!
�1.1. w ■wiw ■w
11111111 .11!111111
111 111 � 11lI�t'1 y
■ 11 � 1 1 i1r11Qr11
- =lol 1 �I■1■@ 1
{
■ ■ ■ ■■ ■loll! !
I S k AVE.
O O p
e
O, O O O O
gtoomiubTow Awe.
1111 II't{
■1�1 "I)a!1
a a .
lili�l�l ®Illlll��� . •. • .
' iilllill 1111�� , •• ••
t�o�t�■� �1� !VF
ml�li�l :11111`1
1111111 1111101
jl jl��;l 1111111 11 jl�Ill 1� i " � ,..
111111111111111 1111111 !! °t a ��� 1-11
i .� 1 1,1 ,1 1 1 ■I
^�..
'|
~ '
�
`
_+
' -
_'-
�HJ �
"~' \
.�
^
^
'
. /
" -
t� � t�
~ ~ ~ JL
nil
CL
Ej
~ ~ ~ JL
nil
CITY OF RICIIFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 214
Agenda July 11, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Second Reading: Request for Rezoning from General
Commercial to Planned Unit General Commercial,
Preliminary PUD Plan, Special. Use Permit and
Preliminary Plat, Promotional Department Store Site,
Lynda le /Hub /Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area
On June 13, 977 the city council heard a request from Financial Properties
Developers, Inc, , Atlanta, Georgia, and the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment
Authority for the following: (Council. Letter No, 179, attached)
1 . Zoning district change from general commercial to planned
general commercial;
2. Approval of preliminary PUD plan;
3. Approval of special use permit;
4. Approval of preliminary plat,
At the June 13, 1977 council meeting, the council took action to approve
the preliminary PUD plan, the special use permit and the preliminary plat,
contingent upon implementation of the rezoning,
The second reading on this zoning district change is scheduled for the
July 11, 1977 city council meeting. Upon completion of the required public
hearing, it is recommended that the city council approve the zoning district
change from general commercial to planned general commercial.
Respectfully submi - d,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City h4lanager
WSB /eja
cc: Planninci Director
Acting Public Works Director
:;tl-4 /c'-�
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 179
Agenda June 13, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Proposal for General Commercial Planned Unit Development
Promotional Department Store Site - Lynda le /Hub /Nicollet
Redevelopment Project Area
Financial Properties Developers, Inc. , Atlanta, Georgia, and the Richfield
Housing and Redevelopment Authority have requested the following actions of the
city council:
1. Zoning district change from general commercial to planned general
commercial
2. Approval of the preliminary PUD plan
3. Approval of a special use permit
4. Approval of a preliminary plat
The following items are attached to this letter and will be referred to through-
out:
1. Exhibit A - site plan, grading plan, utility plan, lighting plan, and
elevations
2. Exhibit B - development schedule
3. Exhibit C - preliminary plat (to be presented)
4. Exhibit D - L /H /N Redevelopment Plan
5. Exhibit E - traffic projections
Proposal
Financial Properties Developers, roc, is proposing to design, construct and
-Council Letter No. 1.79 -2- June 13, 1977
lease a 68,33),11 square foot K -Mart department store on the promotional department
store site of the Lynda le /flub /Nicollet Redevelopment Project. The project has
been designed and will be implemented within the following guidelines as proposed
by.the developer and Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
The project will be located on 255, 000 square feet of land area and will
provide 370 parking spaces at a parking ratio of 5.4 cars per 1,000 square feet.
The parking will. include eight handicapped parking spaces, in accordance
with state code. Sixty- degree angle parking is provided.
Access to the parking lot will be from 65th Street, with a two - -way entrance
and a two --way exit, and fron, Lyndale Avenue with a right -turn entrance and a
right -turn "out only" exit. The parking lot is designed so that there is a perimeter
two -way traffic moving aisle, and an interior one --way traffic moving aisle. The
two -way perimeter lanes will be 30 feet wide, and the one -way lanes will be 20 feet
wide.
There will be a 30 foot depth in the parking spaces. The ends of the parking
spaces will have concrete aisle markers to identify the parking area in inclement
weather and to insure a more orderly parking arrangement. The parking lot will be
striped.
The parking lot will have trees planted diagonally across the lot, and trees
and landscaping will be provided around the outside perimeter of the lot. Since
the proposed K -Mart is adjacent to two major roadways which carry substantial
traffic, it will be easily accessible by pedestrian movement and adjacent to two
major bus turnout areas.
The developer will provide a 10 foot concrete pedestrian walk and lease life
pedestrian easement across the front of the store. This pedestrian walk will connect
with the mid-block pedestrian system, as proposed in the Redevelopment Plan. The
walk where it crosses driveways, will be of the L /H /N standard bominite material
as per the Urban Design Guidelines. In addition to the mid -block walk, sidewalks
will be provided on Lyndale Avenue and on 66th Street. As outlined in the Redevel-
opment Plan, no sidewalks will be provided on the south side of 65th Street.
The loading area, compactor pad and utility pole which are located on the
66th Street frontage will be completely enclosed with the same building material
as the main building. In addition, the signed one -way entrances and exits on
66th Street will be for service only. The loading areas will be completely screened
from public view on 66th Street by landscaping walls, building enclosures and
landscaping.
The garden area is proposed to have alternating wall areas with black vinyl -
covered fencing and black - covered frame, and a poured concrete floor. In addition,
part of the garden area will be a) vered. Although the garden shop still does not
appear to be part of the main building, it is the opinion of the staff that this is
the best architectural and aesthetic treatment which can be obtained. The garden
Council Letter No. 179 -3- June 13, 1977
area will be screened from Lyndale Avenue by the raised landscaped pedestrian
plaza.
The building material (split concrete) will be used on all sides of the building,
The building will be a one -story with meZ7anine concrete construction. The
building's main entrance faces the 65th Street frontage. The garden shop will have
a separate entrance.
Landscaping and screening will be provided around the perimeter and within
the site.' The garden area will be completely screened from 66th Street and Lyndale
Avenue by the corner pedestrian plaza, which is raised and includes extensive
landscaping. The tire, battery and accessory area will be screened from Lyndale
Avenue by.a low, landscape wall (3 feet) and vegetation. Landscaping will be provided
on all sides of the project. The interface between the Northwestern Bell Telephone
lot and building will be softened by landscaping and terracing. The building facing
material will be extended to the east side of the building. The proposed landscaping
conforms with the Redevelopment Plan Urban Design Guidelines.
The drainage plan provides for regrading of the property in such a way that the
parking lot will slope from southwest to northeast. The storm sewer plan provides
for internal drainage of the rooftop area and catch basins at appropriate locations,
to prevent storm water spillage into 65th Street or onto the NWB Telephone property.
The underground storm water system will be connected directly to the city's 65th
Street storm sewer.
The utility plan provides for the water service off of 65th Street to NWB and off
of 66th Street to K -Mart. The sanitary sewer service will be from Lyndale Avenue.
The storm sewer system will be interconnected with the roof drains, and will be
completely underground. Storm sewer drainage is pr posed to the main storm sewer
on 65th Street.
The lighting system will be the standard design lights for the Lyndale /Hub/
Nicollet area, provided at effective intervals throughout the parking lot. Lighting is
also proposed on the building and in the TBA area. The K -Mart sign is to be used on
the 65th Street building front canopy, and there will be an additional sign on the 66th
Street side. The 66th Street sign will help break up the solid wall on that frontage.
A non - illuminated "Auto,, and "Garden Shop" sign are proposed within a signing strip
on the building west elevation.
The site and proposal offer both aesthetic amenities and economic amenities.
The proposal conforms to all the L /H /N. Urban Design Guidelines. One of the goals
of the Redevelopment Plan was to attract a major department store to the area; and
the plan provides'for such a promotional department store. The reason for attracting.
a major department store was to revitalize the retail commercial activity of the
L /H /N area and to stabilize the Area's future. The stabilization of the L /H /N area
also will stabilize the future of the surrounding residential area. The Economic
Analysis completed early'in the L /II /N planning process indicated that a major
department store was a key element to the successful rcjuvination of the L /H /N area.
(;ouncil Metter No. 179 -4- June 13, 1977
Staff Review
The project has been reviewed for compliance with development objectives
contained in the Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Chapter III, Part IV, Section
3. 34, Subd. 4 of the city code, as well as for compliance with the city's subdivision
regulations. In addition, the applicant's proposal has been reviewed for com pliance
with the Redevelopment Plan, and the Urban Design Criteria of the Redeve lopmernt
Plan.
Relationship to the Zoning Ordinances and Plans
The PUD section of the zoning ordinance requires that a proposed PUD plan
be compared to the zoning ordinance requirements otherwise applicable to subject project.
That is, if this project were not developed under the PUD section, the provisions of
use regulations for C -2 general commercial. districts, Section 3.33 of the zoning
ordinance, would otherwise be required. Shown below is a comparison of what the
city requires for a C -2 commercial activity, and-what is actually proposed for the
11UD project.
Parking
Height Requirement
Setbacks - Front yard
Rear yard
Side yard
Use Regulation from
C -2 General Proposed Under
Commercial District the PUD
1 sp. for ea. 200 sq. ft.
of retail area = 242 sp.
3 stories or 40 feet
40 feet
40 feet
-0- feet
5. 4 cars per 1, 000 sq. ft.
= 370 spaces
1 story - approximately
19 feet
65th Street - 316 feet
Lyndale - 80 Feet
66th Street - 24 feet
Not applicable
-0- feet - the proposed
K -Mart is located approx.
60 feet from Northwestern
Bell Building
The comprehensive plan, as amended by the city council in June, 1976, indicates
promotional department store land use on this site, which is within the boundaries of the
Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet Redevelopment Project. The Redevelopment Plan also indicates
promotional department store land up to 100,000 square feet on this site. The proposed
project has been coordinated with the subdivision regulations and is in compliance
with the subdivision regulations.
It is the opinion of the city staff that the project is in general conformance
with the comprehensive plan and the redevelopment plan, that the differences between
the proposal and the otherwise applicable provisions of the use regulations for General
Commercial districts are minimal. In many cases, the proposed project exceeds the
Council Letter No. 179 -5- June 13, 1977
standards of the general commercial district. The differences from the general
commercial district standards would not be detrimdntal to the public interests
and, in fact, would appear to enhance the public interest. The proposed project
was designed to provide ingress and egress at two separate. locations - Lyndale
Avenue and 65th Street. This design will eliminate the sole use of either Lyndale
Avenue or 65th Street as entrances. A public entrance to the area will not be
provided from 66th Street. Traffic coming from the west on 66th Street would turn at
66th Street and Lyndale Avenue, proceed north and turn into the K -Mart lot. Traffic
coming from the south on Lyndale would proceed tnrough the 66th Street intersection
and turn into the lot at Lyndale Avenue. Traffic coming from the north on Lyndale
would turn at 65th Street and proceed to the 65th Street entrance. Traffic coming
from Nicollet would proceed on 65th Street to the 65th Street entrance. The 65th
Street entrance provides for two ingress lanes and two egress lanes with a two -foot wide
chatter strip between the ingress and egress lanes. Vehicle stacking room is provided
in the 30 foot two -way driving aisle. Service entrances are provided off of 66th
Street. The service area will provide for two semi - trailer trucks in an enclosed loading
area, as well as stacking and maintenance room: A 22 foot driving lane is proposed
along the loading enclosure and a 50 foot wide backing area is provided for trucks to
back into the leading enclosure. These service entrances are one -way from east
to west, and are not for customer access.
The K -Mart store is expected to generate approximately 70 vehicle trips per
1, 000 square feet per day or 4, 780 trips per day. The public street design which
is being completed in 1977 and 1978 will adequately handle the trip generations of
this project as well as other projects within the redevelopment area (Exhibit E) . It is
expected the trip generations to the K -Mart will be as follows:
Lyndale Avenue South (20 %) 900 ADT
Lyndale Avenue N. and 65th Street (15 %) 675 ADT
66th Street (20 %) 900 ADT
Nicollet South and 66th Street East (30 %) 1,350 ADT
Nicollet North and 65th Street East (181/;) 675 ADT
Bus Transit (maybe double ridership, i.e., 280 ADT
get off bus and pick up car)
Total 4,780 ADT
The existing traffic generation for the land uses on the site is approximately
750 ADT. (23, 372 square feet and 10 houses).
The orientation of the site to 65th Street provides for better traffic flow on 66th
Street and Lyndale,Avenue, and provides for better utilization of the existing traffic
sytstems. This orientation also creates an urban structure space which helps give
a sense of place at the the 66th Street /Lyndale Avenue intersection.
It is the opinion of the city staff that while there w,.11 be a substantial increase
in traffic generation at this site, the majority of this traffic will use the 65th Street
Council Letter No. 179 --6- June 13, 1977
exit. With the implementation of the L /I-I /N public improvements, improving the
intersections at 65th Street, 66th Street and Nicollet Avenue and Lyndale Avenue,
as well as improving the lengths of street, that there will be adequate capacity
for the increased traffic generation.
The parking of 5.4 cars per 1, 000 square feet is adequate for a 68, 334 square
foot K --Mart store, in light of the heavy use of mass transit in the Lyndale and
66th Street area. Bus turnout lanes are provided at 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue.
The area is serviced by 143 MTC bus routes.
K -Mart Commercial Site Intensity of Land Use
Net land area
Cross land area
Floor area
Land use intensity
Proposed Allowed by Ordinance
254,972 sq. ft. Not applicable
286,768 sq, ft. Not applicable
68,834 sq. ft. 131,627 sq. ft.
Not Applicable 52 LUI
Floor Area ratio .240 FAR .459 FAR
The proposed K -Mart development will have two substantial impacts:
1. Economic impact on the L /H /N redevdopment project.
2. Impact on the existing property owners.
The conoomic impact on the L /H /N redevelopment project is estimated to be as follows
(all figures are in millions of dollars):
1
1. Sales: 1980 - $12,685; 1985- $14,318; 1990- $16,241
2. Additional employment - 170 new jobs, net increase of 120 jobs.
3. Stimulators for 240,000 square feet of additional comparison retail use.
The staff has concluded that the project is necessary to accomplish the goals of
the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet redevelopment project, and will have a substantial impact
on the economic characteristic of the L /H /N area.
Eleven businesses, ten single family homes , and one landscaped lot owned by
the telephone company -ind a public street, Grand Avenue, are located on this site.
The HRA has expressed intent to clear the site by acquisition, relocation of existing
businesses and homeowners, and demolishing or moving the structures and improve-
ments.
1 • Includes all department stores in L /H /N area - K- -Mart 7 million, others 5 million
in 1980.
�_UUncll 1,ULLUL ivv. 1 i , , _... _ .
The closest property to the site is the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company. A
landscape interface is being proposed between the site and NWB Telephone Company.
The property North of this site is multi - family residential. Landscaping will be done
along 65th Street on both the north and south sides of the street to create a visually
pleasing interface between the multi- family residential and the site. Commercial
property to the north, south and west of the site is within the Lyndale /Hub /Ni_collet
redevelopment project, and is expected to benefit from location of the major depart-
ment store on this corner.
Availability of Public Services
The site is adequately served by gas, water, electricity, and sanitary sewage
facilities. A nine -inch sanitary sewer line is in Lyndale Avenue and a 30 -inch main
collector sanitary sewer line exists in 66th Street. A 12 -inch sanitary sewer line
exists in 65th Street, and water is available in 66th Street, Lyndale Avenue and 65th
Street. A 42 -inch storm sewer is located in 65th Street.
The internal storm sewer drain -ige system, which will be in the ground, will drain
to 65th Street to the 42 -inch collector. An additional storm sewer is planned for 65th
Street to handle projected storm water volumes, east of the site. All surface water
on the parking lot and roof will be collected by catch basins and drains and diverted
underground to the 42 -inch collector storm sewer. Gas is available from both Lyndale
Avenue and 66th Street. Electric power is available in 66th Street (the building will be
electrically heated and cooled).
Staff Recommendation
1. Preliminary PUD Plan and Rezoning
This proposal is generally in conformance with the L /I-I /N redevelopment
plan and comprehensive plan and takes maximum advantage of the space
available. It is oriented correctly to adjacent streets. The developers have
provided sufficient parking and landscaped area. The floor area being
proposed is below maximum allowable floor area. Therefore, the proposed
K -Mart is in conformance with the PUD ordinance.
Traffic generated at this location can be handled adequately with the
improvements of Lyndale Avenue, 65th Street and 66th Street, which
are planned for 1977 and 1978. It is the recommendation of the staff
that the council approve the preliminary plan, and rezoning to PC -2
from C -2 general commercial.
2. Preliminary Plat
It is also recommended that the council approve the preliminary plat in
that it conforms to the subdivision regulations for submittal of preliminary
plats.
Council Letter No. 179 -8- June 13, 1377
3. Special Use Permit
The criteria for issuing a special use permit is provided in Section
3.41, sbud. 5 "......issuance will not under the circumstances of the
particular case be detrimental, (1) to the health, safety, morals,
-comfort, convenience or welfare of the persons residing or working in
the neighborhood of such use, or (2) to the public welfare or injurious
to property or improvements in the neighborhood. It is the opinion of the
-city staff that these criteria have been satisfied.
In summary, it is recommended that the city council take the following separate
actions:
1. Approve the PUD plan
2. Approve a zoning district change from general commercial to planned
general commercial
3. Approve the preliminary plat
4. Find that the conditions for granting of a special use permit are satisfied,
and approve the special use permit.
Planning Commission Recommendation
Following a staff presentation and additional comments from the developer, the
planning commission heard testimony from interested persons. The commission then
discussed the proposal as it relates to the L /H /N redevelopment plan and the compre-
hensive plan for the city. Following this discussion, the planning commission made
the following recommendations:
1. Recommended to the city council a zoning district change from general
commercial to planned general. commercial for this site.
2. Recommended to the city council approval of the preliminary :PUD plan as
presented for this site.
3. Recommended to the city council approval of the preliminary plat for the
K -Mart site
4. Recommended to the city council approval of the special use permit in that
the conditions for a special use permit are satisfied.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
cc: Planning Director
Acting Public Works Director
TO II
'"ll N,1311,Lnnu ,Nv
wIk
Ill
_ -- }.
j Z
wl
PTi
r�
I
I
\mil Vii:
Yo
Qr
cr
UL
j ;j
J1.1
zz.
6t
-711
ul
N,
JL- j
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
LA
Ell
---
l-U--UfTf IL
T"S'l I T T! T'll T--)
Ilk
Oki
Eli
1
2
I.
iI
fl
zl= O -_
wma=---------------
-----------
��
(( UA_ J I ri 11L_JH 111L.
Ll
H H u n-
fill
1.
1
2
I.
iI
fl
_j
LL
zl= O -_
wma=---------------
-----------
��
(( UA_ J I ri 11L_JH 111L.
Ll
H H u n-
1.
_j
LL
wma=---------------
-----------
��
(( UA_ J I ri 11L_JH 111L.
H H u n-
1.
_j
LL
er
mm.
11E Ir
11
I—J
Ul
I.
ll
Ul
11 t
iii
o
--7C
Ul
I.
ll
Ul
11 t
iii
o
K - M A R `1' D I V E I, O P M I.,_ N T S C 1 T I__ D U L ]?
�.. BRA Begins Acquisition - August 1, 1977.
2. Jury 1, 3_978 or March 1, 1979 - Closing on Land.
3. Start Construction 3rd quarter_ 1978 or 2nd quarter 1979.
4. Dependent on
closing
date -
14ill Open
For
Business
2nd quarter
of 1979
or 4th
quarter of
1979
respectively.
. ... ,Crorrr o: a•.Y -a a:: J4 ?' a .. .n�c •G.
(cla, {:.y _+JitifiET'.a:•i -'. '1 -• (- .__.____.r.`L -' -1' Y k. � (�°
rl
-. -
«; :x::r, t� :
- 1`'L...] 1 Ica '•
(i i{ (d�r.it F�• 'icy----'•: -- -�
5 4 n j I/
fiii�� =n
I(
t-
)T
Io
�l�n'1,%'1.! i; ....��µ�:.�_il�1a.•`I,w��,7 --;� !!\ tt\;- , %l' ::'1,"'.°,l(:,..t)�r.,.7r- •..111 �- --..._��- -- - -�- I .- I.�... _
• 11 � `�� '�� + \iln it; (f' '�tl .rt. r;�� f � "Its,
t; ., \� r,rc,•r,tl •\ i}tl r� } +r' '„ � � ri 49 i `�f } �
.11✓ \..�k,�.�;1 it 1. r. J,. .e.t :•� + C, (1 •x, ,. ,.ir \ ,', , PJ
.. r. }t�,) �..�tj �I \:i l(r��tia t'...�i, ,...1!_'/ r.J c.7 ,:(�.. :.•J v):,:� � , �, r, _.r o- I I I � 1�(
`1 rn,.•te r7r-.1 ,i..Y'l G..1,1:' \1 tn,` I ._.___: I� Y., •'t U I •,�_ I X 1. °�
,
eo...Yr:. -., t__,:..�uM�,l �i t.,,�_.,, •� •t r..... 4 _,,,, if •r \\ ����(..�_...____.
�) .,1 v .':, •r,`x :( �Il 't. ,O {.. � gip, � CI, 't'� ,( t'
'JAY Ur(,A)te _ i:iF��� sit
i_ N "1�( /i jk'
'• t .. " () yr _) ;; C:'tl _- `�1/ 1- �)\7)`' N • J
r '.r (' f •1 :1. i_,! 'Y 1_..i' r t'; L u).
,-
oil
� a)
(\ t ,'�� y•'t[ •. 3 -l•i• Ci(� )(� z Ft� v O.t.. jr, ^ (f',u)- ( F).� y d - rr•-
,
'
c 3,,Y 1St• �. •• Lp) nC,' ,�. � .,.` i x -•Z ,'',_il. initl .
sill
-... n./ `y ,'`. -•i. ,.7�• I �-- ••(( i C - - ... u. i �l)l )rJ (:: ) _ ,1
t 1 > • u ('.rlc„ ..r ,:.c r r X:•, fa.�..,, ._ � s _ u... rn - }v
I •`, `` ; S � 6:,..r'va• .. � „ ~,r�`•. - °dr �t� � '�f J��3, , I I, I (Z _ -__ �. (1 l•.-,1 } • ,.'.� �' fJ�l {� 1 ., / _ � J _o_
�^ \ •� s \`r 1]170JN ' ' t7 1.' S.r� } J ,1 F�/ _ y —,foul
.. ',;` -�• ` / :�•' .',... .ter. rill ^P 'C 1,(u 6'r ♦ n rH, K;:.aa ..,( �,t J'.1. )� _.. .[ ___�__._.- S
�• - ,.•, -� �" i._ t � � I (j1j I I ( I i" • r I r ;•1 v; ty� -� (— t r',•.
{r tt v C 1Zc� i �_ ]`> e l l `..J t ti,�� - - +: C j1� ✓
JAY -j1J0W1U
Jj
, 1•a1'.t L'(M ~ 1 t• J ��_ _- _ —�l i! /� -�� r J ice' °Zi> \''^'°' < '�' # "t V �_,
;_ t'. ,t _l �• y -f t�:! / %'\ •. mil__— r����Q� ij - ) •_ �• ?� �t!_- �`�
,�_ iY ,• t X13; OKI'
oil 'l(",c We . O
1 :}:, ._- 1,1if.G 7•i - -1._C" �'N ( �.� /'�?,� I, IIi - .: <r Jvc$ cC �'Lia
" _ - -�:� ,I t ;; ^J c��". .• will
({'j� -
CU
, � -v� x•f :., ~ � ;` ;' Lr��l 7} t!]_- � t �. 1.1
�YiJ -
}•.. • �'
• [ ,T ', ` () 1 � .� -: � 1 - `�� j `! ,... 1j _ S- �, r t" .� i <� ,r,3Y):r= t I- .s�.n� 60
FTC
7 , � .) ,' •, T)''
All4, ,- ....1 - �---`` � •��� -'� ` .. L_.l I �_ ,,` r=r�I� � .till
AD" `' 7•• ) "J`• f _.f..
`'.•d c.,. ',> �, t 2 ».. ti �.. / 7 jet, C,,{ /! � ``� x � �� I vC' i+ (;�r� '� Jr �,r / 't i:� AS
Lj41 U.i
I ; ��•; \ . �� ✓1. /, �• . .. / V /`5 (fir_, �I ` -� ' , ( +• +•
e.
Lh
all
cc3
• i L
J
. c
A �d
C. C\j Co
1W
............................
c
V V
_41
Xj:,
i la
0
c
cc3
• i L
J
. c
A �d
C. C\j Co
1W
............................
c
V V
_41
Xj:,
i la
1. A)e nur?IDer of net additional daily trips which % %'ould be
generated by the projected development is estimated.
e
2. The direction of approach to the redevelopment area for
the net additional trips is then estimated.
3. The net additional
trips are
-2--
system and added
to
existing
-
1- t•lr�l iZ .•, 4 r
The purpo se of
this report is
to illustrate that the
revised sfi,eet
syst.el ?l �.IZC1.UdC'.d
aS j)a).rt of: t °ile
Lyndal.e�IIUI_)�N1Collet Comimercial
he
IZcdevc,l_ol;nu nt Program
i_s suf-fi_ci.ent
to handle t.raffi_c
volumes in
the area after
redevelopment.
h four -step procedure
is utilized
as follows:
1. A)e nur?IDer of net additional daily trips which % %'ould be
generated by the projected development is estimated.
e
2. The direction of approach to the redevelopment area for
the net additional trips is then estimated.
3. The net additional
trips are
then allocated to the street
system and added
to
existing
traffic counts to determine
post- development,
volumes.
an origin or dest:i.nat:i.on.
- For example,
4. Finally, streets are.desi_gned to handle the future pro-
jetted traffic.
Trips Generated
The fol.]_o ril;g table summarizes the computations made in deterrii_ninq
the additional traffic to be generated by- the projected develo; mlent.
The art?ount of land for each use listed is based on the redevelopment
plan dated Octobcr, 1975; and the trip generation rates per thousand
square feet %.,ere derived by Bather- Ringrose- ;'olsfel_d (BR.•r) . Base
data for the rates included trip generation surveys conducted by B-ITN"
as part of the Metropolitan Council's Travel Behavior inventory Study
and reports by the H:i_ghway Research Board. Facilities included in
the firm's survey were three Target stores, t�ao Gem stores, a 1,11ard's
develop;?lent, and five major apartment complexes. As long as the types
of land use do not vary, the added daily trips can constantly be
updated as development plans are finalised by merely adjusting for
the actual_ square footages .
Net Additional
Type of Gross Square
Land Use Feet
Promotional-
Depart ment
Store 85,000
Other
commercial 2 110,000
Office - 33,000
`J.'O`J'A1'. 228,000
Residential
TOTAL
1A trip end is
person rllrll:c:;
ar_r.ives and o
r+
Reduction Factor Trip Additional
For Net Leasable Generation Day Vehicle
Square Feet Rate Trip Ends
0.8
70/1000
s.f:1
4,700
o.8
32/1.000
s.f.
2,820
0.8 14/1000 S.f. 370
7,950
400
dwelling units
5. 5 /1). U.
2,200
10,150
either
an origin or dest:i.nat:i.on.
- For example,
when a
trip
to the flub, he
one trip end Who))
he
o trip
end when he leave, for
a total of two.
--3-
27.'1 -)e no? -mal t.ri.p c3e1-)erat.i on rate fo,- "Other -Commercial-" in this t% pe
of development is 40 /1000 s.f. I'll tlii -s cake a reduct:i_on fact: -o'- o
20 per cant has boor, app.l. c(1 to account for mul t:i-pu) -pose tr:i p ; (e.
g., a shopping trip by a person 1.2110 works in one of t1le new of f i cc:; )
and int-e.. ceptcd t.r_it.)s (e. d. , trips that are already on the st)cct-
system and I.J i l l stop at one of the new Stores.
Trip Dust-Anati.on and Assignment
The redevelopment plan also included an extensive mancot study W;;:i -c:h
delineated the Tyndale /I3ub /Nicollet trade area after rcdevelop.ment.
Based on the orientation of the project= area to the trade area aridd,
to the existing primary roz.dway system, additional traffic is expected
to be distribu Led as shown bolow.
;s
65th Street
U
r-i
ro
20,C) a
i
:I
U
.E 1
Q)
r -�
U
•r{
15
E''•,
:r. �- "':';'.-�'�- �:...: :�€ar..:..c= ss.;..zruxz ,,_� -.erua _e,.�rr- xa- ..:- •.:- ,..k. - =.. >e :..a.r.:.e,K- :.. -� -.rce rafe„eee„+e��va :.v.- ... vs ':tr.:sy.:�
66th Street
.,,a;.r �j.
( 200
15
This
step allocates t -he
additional daily trips to
the street system
based
on the locations of
the proposed developments,
the number_ c
trips
generated, and the
direction distribution of
traffic as shc; -;n
on the
pre�ceeding page.
Post- nevelonment Volumes
To arrive at post- development volumes, the current traffic mu!�:t first
be updated for future years` changes; and then the additional trim:
added, The current volumes shown in the Plan of October, 1975, have
not been used for this report. While being the most current avai_1•-
abl_e, the figures are not adjusted for daily and seasonal variations.
Therefore, the volumes frown the 1974 County flow map, which are
adjusted, constitute the base data.
All effective method to est:i.mate 1.900 volumes is to ut:i- l.i_ze historical
trends, i.e., to adjust current volumes based upon volume changes
experi-c! aced during the pa;i: few years. The following sketch shov,7s
the daily volt.mcs on 66tH Street and W..coll.et Avenue for each of the
following years -- 1969,, 1.970, 1971, 1973 and 1.974.
-4-
•
area arc do L i.gned or
used in
a)
way that they carry I - J- imited volume
of traffic. 1n
some cas�c�s
.j
presently are more vch:i.cle s on
the exist.i.nd street:,
O C) CD C) C7
f-
is de;.>i_gncd to carry. This is
evi(Jcr)ced by the conge'st.ion
c)c- -�Yainm
e)
R.ichf -Leld I3nl]); & `].'runt and near
t1w exist-ing 1.,yndale
Garden
Ccliter.
Once O)e streets are as
per the plan, there
will, be
suf_t:i.c.i.ent
capacity to handle existing and
p) -o jcct(:.d inc).- etlsed
r- I(DNNrS
in the
MIN Circa.
r —i r —i
4j .
Q)
1 -1 CJ M
o
Ol Cil CIl Ol Gl
•t -{
r_{ r—i H r—i w-i
t
'r
4ai:�_:T:.,.- •:_ <t:::.ex.w
nr. �. cx�• xeKr .�:r.w.:x:e,r..era.:.zurnv. roc;.-..
�....- .:.r>:�m- ,:- .:xu;..r,..,.,e,: �.,n•�- ,r-.er c.� -,..o:
.. vs .•:e,.r�,,.r...w�r.:r:�e -rra�J
19.74 :-
1.4,100
66th Street
1973
.1-4,100
1971
16,100
1970
- 14,150
1969
- 13,800
These statistics shot, that volumcs pca}ced in 1971, and that current
volumes are at about the saIite level as experienced in 1.969. Based
on this trend, it is expected that 19 °0 volumes, without the pro-
posed LIIN redevelopment, t-, -ould be about the sane as experi_enced in
1.9'74. The projected 1980 traffic vo.lurlcs sllot,:l� on the next chart
and on the attached r,,ap ent.i.tled "Updated .Existinq and Post -De. velop-
),1i.nt Volumes" do include the additional trips to he generated by
devel_o1:«nt. The entire increase in capacity, then, from 1974 to
1.980 is attributed to the- new construct -ion.
As part of the Hennepin County Transportation Syst Study which FF:�
has conducted for the County, volume projections for the year 2000
were developed. Three different volume levels Caere developed to
account for potential variation in key factors that influence the
amount. of vehicular travel, e.g. , price and ava:i.l_<;bi.lity of gasoline,
daily trips per person, car occupancy, and the usage of transit.
Under the medium volume level, which assumes that car occupancy will
increase by four_ per cent over the 1970 .level_ and that transit usage
wi_11_ increase by 30 per cent, year 2000 voluines, would remain about the
sart,e as presently experienced. Under the high volu:lc level, which
assliffles that car occupancy and transit usage will remain �-rt- their
present levels, volumes on streets in the MIN area would increa >e 7
about 30 per cent over 1974 values. In order to achieve the hi(l)lest-
potential volumes, the figures included in the next Chart for year -
2000 maximum traffic volumes assumes the full 30 per cent increase in
traffic after developme))t (the 1.980 figures)
rxist_i_nq and Pl_anncd Capacity
The oxa.sti.ng strec.:ts in the LIIN
area arc do L i.gned or
used in
such is
way that they carry I - J- imited volume
of traffic. 1n
some cas�c�s
. there
presently are more vch:i.cle s on
the exist.i.nd street:,
L.han the
street:
is de;.>i_gncd to carry. This is
evi(Jcr)ced by the conge'st.ion
near"
the
R.ichf -Leld I3nl]); & `].'runt and near
t1w exist-ing 1.,yndale
Garden
Ccliter.
Once O)e streets are as
per the plan, there
will, be
suf_t:i.c.i.ent
capacity to handle existing and
p) -o jcct(:.d inc).- etlsed
traffic
in the
MIN Circa.
(It j ci_i.n, the 2000 l.)ro jcct.ed voltanues are the same as those for 1900.
The chart figures )_ndlc(lte the worst situations.) T))c? foIIowlny
table de:;cri.bccl the exi.� ting and upgraded street capacities, a-I -Ong
with ex:ist:i-ng and projected traffic volumes.
Ex.i.sting ] xi_st i n UI?gradcd Proj acted T) -�J f f: is Vo I uni(I
Capacity Traffic Capacity 1980 M• - Iximtlnl ?000
Vol -time
Nicollet
Avenue 17,000 11,900 2.4,000 131600 17,680
Lync3.alc-
Avenue 12,000 14,700 24,000 161300 21,190
66th Street
(East of
Nicollct) 10,000 13,100 18,000 14,800 19,240
66th Street
01est- or.
�
Lynda.l_c) 18,000 22,900 28,000 251000 32,500
66th Street
(Bett•:cen
Lynda l_e &
Nicollet -) 22,000 15,500 28,000 18,000 23,400
Coll Clus i_on
Streets are desi.gn`,d for 25 years. The above table indicates that the
upgraded' system will not on]-y provide surficent capacity for the 1900
post- developr,cnt traffic but in most cases for the maximium potent. al_
year 2000 loads. The DIN area should, �•;ith upgraded streets, have a
congestion -free traffic system capable of pr-ovidi_ng access to exi_Fting
and planned deve_l_opment. + The plannecl traffic system should solve the
congestion on Lyndale Pvenue, 66th Street, and the Nicol.l_et -66th Street
intersection and should provide convenient- access to the LIIN shopping
area.
Detail. of Sti,eet: 11)-i_ovemcnt
lm �roven�ent :_; on Count :�T Strect:s
West: 66th Street Lakesllore Dr.,nic to Lynclale Awmuc; an.crecise IXINYOment
l:ran 50 feet to 66 feet -Ijld ri8ht- of -t,ay froin 66 feet to
83 feet .-.
Construct left turnjll; lave at Gr.111.11n "uncl 1,I!x--
shore Avenucs and complex c:lltrr.lnr.c.
• TrolI i.do for bus tua- »outs at i,ynclal c int:ersc(AR Il.
Upgrade sij),n-cr1 on Viest. 66th Strcct- an.cl 1,Y30,11 C.
Constl ict 1`1cclIZIMS
l'rav i de for lxc(1cMx3 rv) t:<<iys f -onl N)10 Shorc: lb.,ivc to
l'lc<1 ;,1111. alld f -oil, 14icollct. to l i.)•>t /Avenue.
Nicol.lct Avenuc 1'i'i.den at: 661.h 1 6St.h Strcct: to c :rcat cd protect ccI left
turn l an'es . Construct left turning l aac ; at Hub N i c..,' )"at.
C))tranCC.
Coy)st:)'L)('1: )ncdians from 6701 Street. to (At1) St)'CC1..
1\1i-col_l et Avenue
1`,est 6St :1) Street
In
11.1cst 67th St-.L-Oct
14cst 681)1 Street
Lal;c Shore Drive
Circle Place
• Xyx)dal_c Avenue
Co)Zstrucl. bt)s 1.Ln-nout.s at 66th Strcct i- nterscc1.30il.
Construct pedestrian hays from 671_h Street to 6 1th S' :rc•(:t..
UJ-)p"1de si pal mid provide turni.nL; la c !' on \i co11 C t ::,ld p
1 i.�cd 05th 66th Strect. Insta a �,t reef.
and Nicol.lct.
COnStrltet bus turn outs at 1licollet.
Provide tur;.ing lanes into 1):)b and Nicollet strip
areas. '
Improve,nent s on City Strects
Reali -gn street fro;n P_i]- lshury to )licol_].et part :ial.]y : :�
p) "CSC)lt a1.71;r,r::cnt of 6,11-, Street-..
}3113tl11.nate inter sections with 1'i].].sl :"Ury, I'Jentl;orth, in
Blaisc]el.l Aventle.
and lam :]scape buffers)�o :_t
Lyndale to Nicol] -ct.
Co))strttct ].eft turn lanes at Lyndale.
Const.roct. landscape buffer, Lyndalc 1=o (31-and Avenue.
Construct dead -cnd at Grwtd.
Ca)sl.ruct left turn lanes at Lyndalc.
Close street at rail.rond trac]'s.
Const-nict lartdscapc buffer.
Vacate from 66th Strcct to Lyndal -c rttainta:im.nL; a.
case "lleltt:.
InCrC,ISC pavc)ltent lddt-11 from 60 facet to 66 feet:.
Construct pcc]est:rian t�al.laJay froltt La1;e Shore to 6.1t:h Strcc,
Construct n)cd:i any from La];c Shorc Drive e t:o Wcsl 64 Ill )-cc i
. y fl) turn )rules at Garden cl).t.r.lncr., Lynd:llc 11:)rdtr)rc,
hichfJcl(I St�Lt.c Af;cncy, IV. 66th St:. , GStIt Sfi.) cct: arn?
1:1.c1uor st-oru.
Construct pecle'stri an tq jys fro,,, La);c .;Jtol'c 1)r. to W. Gfi t 1, 51.
Up�,rt,dc s -J Anal. at Ly)tdal e tend We ,t. With St.rc.ct. 1n
nctr pc(lc'I'ni'm sif;nal on L.yn<l.,le h"'Imeell h'c ,1: G`it :Il
lt'est 661:h Streets. )nS.U11 . now :;il;u.)l. 1.yn1a1c ,)rd ('7111.
r7_
Ilarrict Avcnttc South
V�.lcat.c bctt�;ccn h'cst 6711) and I'�`c;fi. 66tH Str('ct.
Grand Mcnt):-� Sotlta).
Vacatc bcta:ccn ]'Lest 66'01 and lti'cst 65th St.rect:.
)2cali f;n I)ctt�cen 1'Je>t. 67th and h7cst 66th "tr(!ct s, and
Const1`t)ct. la);dSC1))c buffer,
plca sant. klenue South
Conn- .7't)ct ))C(Icst -ri.aln 1"'a1lovay from West 65th St.,.l': et to
Mst 67th Street.
Pillsbury Avenue SoUtI2
Vacate l'i_J.1.sl)tn-y from I',est 66th Strcct to I'!e st 6 1;t.11 S".rcct.
Co)I !�t21)ct ct11_ -de -sac nortl-) at I'Jcst 6Sth S)trCe.t.
11ontworth Ave. So. 11
Dead - -en'T or construct Cul -de -sac north of realigjl(''I
)31ai_sdcll Ave. So.
651.h Strict: -w i.th a dead end. it 65th
Street-ay
Street no -i -th f ro:11 iiC St 06th St) -ect. 1 -0
Vilest 651-h Strcet.
Construct lnnc]sca))'c buffer rot11 Wost 66th Strcct to
65th Street.
Railway
r 7 c
�,O)Ist.rt)ct pcdestr;an 1',a.y 1)�Oi11 66tH to 67th St2.'i -et. J)�ll:�!
Snyder's to 65i.)2 St2cet.
Off street improvernen s including parking lots, pedestrian walkways,
pedestrian plazas, and landscaping, are an integral part of the
clef %el.op)r,, nt: of the Overall area. Although very close coorc3.i.nat.ien
will be required between the Housing and Redevelop tent Authority
the developers, the responsibility for those improvements lies with
the private sector and will not be a part of the City street project.
The pedestrian ways within the street rights -of. -way and adjacent
easements will generally consist of an eight- foot- �•ti.de side\-ral_k.
There will be consider-able street tree plantings throughout the area.
Associated with the walkway system will be a number of rest. area ,
Nqlth benches, trash containers, screen walls, and landscape materials.
Upgrading and uniformity, of street lighting will be a part; - of the
improvement to all streets ill the project.
Bill 1977 -15
AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX
C OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD,
MINNESOTA
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Appendix C of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota describing the boundaries of the zoning districts
enumerated in Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.28,'Subdivision 2
of said code is hereby amended as follows:
I. By adding after Section 6 to Appendix C the following
section:
"Section 7. Planned General Commercial (PC -2)
(1 ) All of Lots 1 through 4, inclusive, Block 3;
and the West 10.00 feet of Lots 5 through 8,
inclusive, Block 4; and that part of Grand Avenue
which would attach to Lots 1 through 8, inclusive,
Block 3 and Lots 1 through 8, inclusive,. Block 4,
all in J. N. Hauser's Second Addition. (K -Mart/
HRA Development parcel)"
II. By amending Section 3, paragraph. (31) of said Appendix
C to read:
" (31) All of Lots 3, 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19, 20, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks Addition;
[Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block 4, J. N. Hauser's
Second Addition;] and Lot 8, Block 3, J. N.
Hauser's [3rd] 2nd Addition except the west 10.00
feet thereof.-"
III. By amending Section 3, paragraph (72) of said Appendix
C to read:
"(72) Lots [1) 5 through 7, Block 3 except the
West 10.00 feet thereof and Lots 1 through 7,
Block 4, J. N. Hauser's Second Addition."
Ra
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 213
Agenda July 11, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Concerning Sauna Licenses
At the June 13, 1977 city council meeting the council gave first reading
approval to an ordinance amendment limiting the number of sauna and massage
parlor licenses to four. At the present time, there are only four licenses
outstanding, and there are no applications for new licenses on file.
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is recommended
that the city council give second reading approval to this ordinance amendment
at their July 11, 1977 meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Safety Director
City Clerk
it
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER V,
PART II, SECTION 5.25 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
CITY OF- RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.25, Subdivision 2 of the
ordinance limiting the number of sauna licenses which may be
issued is hereby amended by amending paragraph (1) thereof
to mead as follows:
"(1) It is found and determined that the type of business
activity subject to licensure under this section is particularly
subject to abuse which may take a number of forms contrary to .
the morals, health, safety and general welfare of the community.
Further, it is found that control of these abuses requires intensive
efforts of the public safety department as well as other depart-
ments of the city. These efforts exceed those required to control
and regulate other business activities licensed by the city. This
concentrated use of city services tends to detract from and
reduce the level of service available to the rest of the
community and thereby diminishes the ability of the city to
promote the general health, welfare, morals and safety of the
community. The number of sauna and massage parlor licenses which
may be in force at any one time shall be [five]-four."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
%iinnesota, this day of
.ATTEST:
City Clerk
0
Mayor
1977.
U
C It
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
W
Subject: Traffic Control Requests
Council Letter No. 212
Agenda June 27, 1977
Deferred July 11, 1977
MAO
The Traffic Control Committee met on Tuesday, June 21, 1977 to review
pending requests for traffic controls. Minutes of that meeting are attached
to this council letter as well as a copy of the criteria established to warrant
installation of traffic control devices.
Based on review of these requests, the committee makes the following
recommendations:
"No Parking Anytime" north side of 77th Street, Stevens to Second
Avenue: Extension of the "No Parking Anytime" restriction on the north
side of 77th Street eastward from Stevens Avenue to Second Avenue.
"No Parking Anytime" W. Pleasant Avenue, 62nd to 65th Streets:
Establishment of "No Parking Anytime" on West Pleasant Avenue
4etween 62nd and 65th Streets.
WSB /eja
XIF
Respectfully sub ' ted,
3. a r4re
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
TRAFFIC CONTROL COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 21, 1977
The Traffic Control Committee convened at 8:15 a.m. , June 21, 1977
Members present were: T. Morgan, M. Raaen, R. Richardson, J. Wilde.
The Committee considered the following items:
1. "No Parking Anytime',' North side of 77th Street, Stevens to 2nd Avenue:
J. Wilde reported that this request was received from a resident at the
intersection of 77th Street and Stevens Avenue, adjacent to the spot where
present parking restrictions end. The request was initiated because of
congestion resulting from parking for patrons of businesses in the area.
M. Raaen observed that this area did have parking restrictions prior to
completion of the street paving project.
The committee recommends extension of the "No Parking Anytime" res-
triction on the North side of 77th Street from Stevens Avenue east to
2nd Avenue.
2. Oakland Terrace at Lakeview Avenue: J. Wilde reported that this request
was for a sign to stop Oakland Terrace traffic, at Lakeview Avenue. R.
Richardson reported that no accidents have occurred at this intersection
within the last 5 years. M. Raaen reported that traffic counts were
very low. Committee members observed that the intersection is adjacent
to a city park area.
The committee recommends that the warrants for installation of a one -
way stop sign are not met, but that the proximity of the park could be
considered in evaluating this request.
3. 68th at Xerxes Avenue: J. Wilde noted that this request had also been
submitted to the City of Edina, since the vest side of Xerxes Avenue is
in the Edina city limits. The Edina Traffic Control Committee has rec-
ommended that this request be denied, in that the warrants for installation
of a two -way stop sign are not met. fl. Richardson reported that Public
Safety Department records indicate one accident at this intersection in
the past 5 years.
The committee voted to recommend denial of this request.
4. Survey of 68th Street: This request was received from the R.I.N.G.
committee in the L /H /N area, and is based on a change in the project
plan which would leave 68th Street open. The committee tabled this request
pending completion of the. public improvements in the project area.
5. "No Parking Anytime, " 68th - 69th on Xerxes Avenue: J. Wilde reported
that neighbors were concerned with parking by employees and customers
of businesses on York Avenue. It is the committee's determination
that no specific problems exist on the Richfield side of Xerxes Avenue to
warrant establishment of parking prohibitions.
6 "No Parking Anytime ", W. Pleasant Avenue, 62nd - 65th Streets: The
Public Safety Department has requested consideration of parking
restrictions on this area of West Pleasant because of concern that
parking narrows the street in such a way that travel of emergency
vehicles would be hindered. T. Morgan noted that parking is prohibited
on West Pleasant south of 65th St.
The committee recommends establishment of "No Parking Anytime"
On W. Pleasant Avenue between 62nd and 65th Sts.
1 .
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices lists four criteria or
watrarits that should be reviewed in considering two -way stop sign install -
ations. These criteria are; - Y
�- .1.' Intersection of a less important road with a main road Where
application of the normal right -of -way is unduly hazardous.
j Where total traffic entering an intersection averages 500 cars
for a 24 -hour period the 'street with the larger volume should be
classified as the main road and stop signs shall be installed
• stopping traffic on the minor street.
Z. Street entering a through highway or street. It is recommended
that this warrant remain as is. An example of this type of warrant
application would be where residential streets ,enter into 76th
Street, Nicollet Avenue, Lyndale Avenue, etc.
3 * Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. It is recommended
that this warrant remain as is.
4. Other intersections where a combination of high spasd, restricted
view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by
the stop sign. High sped shall mean where one street is posted
in excess of 30 miles an hour or where public safety department
radar checks indicate that a substantial number of people driving
are exceeding the 30 mile per hour speed limit. Serious accident
record shall mean three accidents in a twelve month period or
five accident$ in a 24- �;lonth period.
•Four-Way or Multi -way Ston Signs
The Manual on Uniform Control Devices lists three criteria or warrants
that should be reviewed in considering four -way or multi -way stop sign in-
stallations. These criteria or warrants are;
• =Z; An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported
accidents of a type susceptible 'of correction by a multi -way
stop installation in a 12 -month period. Such accidents include
right and left turn collisions as well as right angle collisions.
2; The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for
any 8 hours of an average day,. and
3, Potential obstructions and /or other street geometric problems that affect
the safety of an intersection.
r. r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 211
Agenda July 11, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Resolution Calling Hearing on Proposed Assessment
for 1976 Permanent Streets
At the June 27, 1977 city council meeting, the council ordered preparation
of the assessment roll for the 1976 permanent street improvements. Preparation
of the assessment roll has now been completed, and the purpose of this council
letter is to receive and set a date of hearing on the assessment roll.
Each parcel involved in this assessment will receive a copy of the legal
notice of hearing, as well as a detailed calculation of their individual special
assessment. The roll has been prepared to give those properties on Logan and
Oliver Avenues credit for the escrow deposit from Bloomington. The total amount
of the proposed assessment roll is $2,308,469.74, which represents 59.3% of
the borrowed cost of this improvement.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution setting
the hearing on the assessment roll for August 8, 1977.
Respectfully sub •tted,
Vv
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Finance Director Ins
I/
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
FOR 1976 PERMANENT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITY PROJECT NO. 674
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 5740 passed by the Council on the 27th day of
June, 1977, the city clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment roll
of the cost of permanent street construction, City Project No. 674, and
WHEREAS, the city clerk has notified the council that such proposed assess-
ment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. A public hearing shall be held on the following date in the
council chambers of the Richfield City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to
pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will
be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such
improvement.
Hearing - August 8, 1977
Street Improvement District No. 10
That area bounded on the north by W. 66th Street, east by Penn
Avenue South, south by the North Service Drive of I -494 and on
the west by the west city limits (Xerxes Avenue South) excluding
W. 66th Street, Penn Avenue South and W. 76th Street.
Street Improvement District No. 11
That area bounded on the north by the 62nd Street Crosstown, on
the east by I -35W, on the south by W. 66th Street and on the west
by west city limits (Xerxes Avenue South) excluding 66th Street,
Penn Avenue South, and Xerxes Avenue South.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing
on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the
notice the total assessable cost of the improvement in the amount
of $2,308,469.74.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 11th day of
July, 1977.
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
Loren L. Law Mayor
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 210
Agenda July 11, 1977
Subject: Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Membership
At the November 8, 1976 city council meeting the city council heard a
presentation concerning the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Mr.
Vern Peterson, Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
and Duane Miedtke, Mayor of St. Anthony and a member of the AMM Board,
reviewed the services provided by the Association. Final action on continuing
City of Richfield membership was deferred until dues of the Association were
determined for the forthcoming year.
Attached is a letter from Lyle Schwarzkopf, the new AMM President, which
we received with the dues statement for the 1977/78 year. The new Association
year begins June 1, 1977 and ends May 31, 1978. A total of 55 cities in the
metropolitan area are currently members of the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities.
The dues for the 1977/78 year are due and payable at the present time. The
amount is $3, 097 which is provided in the current budget and is the same as the
previous year. Payment of the dues is included on the list of bills for the July
11; 1977 city council meeting and it is recommended that this payment be approved.
Respectfully submitted,
W AUL •
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
�t
A
a
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
.�
association of
metro olitan
municipalities
300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street
st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222 -2861
President
Lyall Schwarzkopf
Minneapolis Mr. Wayne Burggraaff
City Hall
Vice President 6700 Portland Avenue So.
June Demos Richfield, Minn. 55423
Roseville
k �c0.4d C `J
June 13, 1977
Past President .Hear Wayne:
Josephine Nunn
Champlin As the new President, it is my privilege to enclose this brief
Richard Asleson note along with your Association Dues Statement for the 1977 -
Apple Valley 1978 membership year which begins June 1, 1977. As a member
of the Association Board of Directors since 1974, I have been
Wayne Courtney pleased with the ever increasing participation of the member -
Edina ship in the activities and committees of the Association.
Walter Dziedzic
Minneapolis
I am also pleased to note the increasing ability of the Associ-
ation to successfully represent the needs and interests of our
Maynard Eder
diverse membership. Even when those interests appear to be
Lake Elmo
very different on the surface, consensus can often be achieved
Robert Hansen
through the debate, discussion and interaction inherent in the
White Bear Lake
processes and procedures of the Association. As many of you
have found through participation in the Association affairs,
David Hozza
cities have far more interests in common than they have inter-
St. Paul
ests which are different regardless of population, size or
Jack Irving
location.
Crystal
The success of the Association's lobbying activities in the re-
J autkremer
Brooklyn Park
cently completed Legislative session, as well as our on -going
efforts with the Metropolitan Council and Commissions, is con -
Myra Lobeck
tir..uing evidence that cities working together works! To as-
Oakdale
sure that local governments remain a viable partner in the over-
all governmental decision making process, the Association needs
Duane Miedtke
St. Anthony
your continued input and financial support as we face new chal-
lenges, opportunities and problems during the coming year.
Bruce Nawrocki
Columbia Heights
We look forward to even a better year in 1977 -78 with your help.
Irving Stern
St. Louis Park
Sincerely,
Larry Thompson
Wayzata
`ark Vaught
Paul
Lyal1 Schwarzk
AMM President and
Minneapolis City Clerk
Duane Zaun
Lakeville
LS:sb
Executive Director
Enclosure
Vern Peterson