10-24-77 agenda
,~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 331
Agenda October 24, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject:.- PUD Zoning District Change. for Wood Lake. School Site
At the September 26, 1977 city council meeting the city council approved a
preliminary plat and gave first reading consideration to a planned multiple
family residential zoning district for the Wood Lake School site. The city
council also gave first reading consideration to a transitory ordinance providing
for a land exchange at this site. Second reading of the rezoning ordinance and
transitory ordinance were scheduled for the October 24, 1977 city council meet-
ing .
A comprehensive staff report on this project was contained in Council Letter
No. 301 submitted for the September 26 city council meeting. The actions being
requested of the city council at the October 24 meeting are second reading and
adoption of the rezoning ordinance and second reading and adoption of the trans-
itory ordinance . Following action on these two matters , it will be necessary
for the developer, Architectural Alliance, Inc. , to complete a final development
plan and to make application for a special use permit for the development. The
final development plan must be consistent with the planned unit multi-family
residential rezoning and approved by the city council. The special use permit
application must be in conformance with the final development plan and must be
issued by atwo-thirds vote of the city council.
It is anticipated that the final development plan and the special use permit
application both of which deal with the design and details of the development.
will be submitted to the city council in late December or early January subject to
favorable action an the land use changes at the October 24, 1977 city council
meeting .
It is recommended that the city council give second reading consideration and
Council Letter No. 331 -2- October 24, 1977
~.
,-
adopt -the following tow ordinance amendments:
1. A zoning district. change from residential to planned unit multi-
residential.
2. A transitory ordinance which provides for a land exchange within
this planned unit development area.
Respectfully sub fitted, '
~.
Wayne S . Burggraaff
City Manager .
WSB/eja
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
Acting Public Works Director
City Attorney
s
L E G A L N O T I C E
NOTICE OF HEARING ON REZONING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the City
Council of the City of Richfield at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, October 24 , 1977 in
the council chambers of the city hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South, to hear
reasons for or against the following:
Rezoning from Residential to Planned Multi-Family Residential
for the following described property:
Commencing at a point in South line of Government Lot 5 distant
1100.43 feet East from Southwest corner thereof, thence Easterly
along center line of County Road #{53 a distance of 32.21 feet,
thence North 13 degrees East 538.65 feet, thence Westerly to a
paint in the extension of Southerly line of West 65th Street
distant 42.3 feet East from Northeast corner of Lot A, °ilverwood
2nd Addition, thence West along said St. line 142 feet, thence
.. South. 180 feet,thenee East 99.7 feet, thence South to beginning
including part of Lot A, Section 28, Township 28, Range 24.
Plat 44828, Parcel 5823. 1100 West 66th Street. (Woodlake School
Property).
All persons interested in the rezoning for the a'oove described property
are hereby notified to be present and they will be heard.
Thomas ~ Moran City Clerk
(Publish: October 12, 1977)
LEGAL NOTICE
!~`
• Bill 1977-23
ORDINANCE N0. 16.44
A TRANSITORY ORDINANCE
PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSI^1 ION
pk' CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
OF THE. CITY
CITX OF RICHFI,RLD DOES ORDAIN:
"Section 1. The following property of the City is hereby authorized to be
..sold and disposed of:
All that part of Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 described as
follows:
' Commencing at the intersection of the East Line of Silver Wood
Second Addition and the South Line of West 65th Street. Thence
East (assumed bearing) along th_e Easterly extens-ion of said South
Line of West 65th Street 42.3 feet to the actual point of beginning
of the tract of land to be described. Thence South 74°, 19', 32"
East 236.17 feet. Thence North 50°, 11' , 27" West 298 .55 feet to
the intersection with a line running Northerly from the actual point
of beginning and parallel with the East Line of said Silver Wood
Second Addition. Thence Southerly 127.35 feet along said parallel
line to the actual point of beginning.
Section 2. The terms and conditions of such sale shall be determined by
z elution of the City Council and the proceeds of such sale shall be used in
.accordance with the provisions of Section 12.05 of the City Charter.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this
day of 1977.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
Attest
.Thomas Mora n, City Clerk
Bill 1977•-22
AMENDML:NT TO' APPENDIX C
OF 'i'HE ORDINANCE CODE
OF '1'IIE CITY OF RICHFIELD,
" ~ MINNESOTA
;~ OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Appendix C of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, ?~innesota descri-
i.~ing the boundaries of the zoning disL-rict enumerated in Chapter III, Part IV,
.Section 3.28, Subdivision 2 of said Code •is hereby amended by adding after Sectioi
to Appendix C the following section:
"Section 8 . Planned Multiple Residential (PMR)
.~~11 that. part of Section 28, 7o~,rnship• 28, Range 24 described as follows to-grit: Beginning
at a point marked "Judicial Landmark Pio. l0" on the east and west quarter line of said '~• .
section distant 410 feet ti•rest measured along said line from the east quarter carnet of said
section; thence south at right angles to said east and west quarter line 74.6 feet to a
~.cint marked "Judicial Landmark Plo. 11", on the original f•}ilitary iZeservation line; thence
squt~tr 79° 38' ti•rest 140.14 feet to a point marked "Judicial Landmark I•}o. 12", thence south
7`' 10' ti•rest 115.44 feet to a point marked "Judicial Landman: E~to. l3"; thence north 7l° 32'
•rest 585.9 feet to a point marked "Judicial Landmark Pto. 14", ~rhich is the actual. point of
beginning of the land to be described; thence north 13° east 333.15 feet to a: point marked
"Judicial Landmark tdo. 18"; thence continuing on an extensi°n of said line 665 feet, more.
{~r less, to its. paint of intersection Frith aline betlreen a point marked "Judicial i_andnari
:.' 21" on the L•resterly meander line of Grass Lake and a paint marked "Judicial. Landman;;
';, 8", marking. an angle point in the mean center line of Grass .Lake; thence north 'll° 4~~~
east along said line a distance of 1.04 feet more or less to said point marked "Jrrc}icial•
}_andmark tlo. 8" ; thence north,resterly a1 °ng the mean center 1 i ne of said Crass Lake to 'i Ls
intersection 5•rith the north line of Government Lot 5 extended, ti•rhich said point is marked
"Judicial Landmark P1o. 7"; thence ~•rest along. said extension of .the north line of Government
i_ot 5 a distance of 206.3 feet; thence southerly to a point on. the heretofore described lin
}~etween the point marked "Judicial Landmark t~lo. 21" and said point marf:ed "Judicial l.andmar
;;o.~ 8", said point on said line being north 71° 44' east °f said point marked "Judicial Lang
nark P}o. 21", a distance of 49 feet; thence south 1° 11' east-128 feet more or less to the
intersection of the extension eastti•rard of the south line of Sixty•-fifth Street as .laid out.
in the plat of Silverrrood Second Addition; thence trest along said extension of said-south
line of said Sixty-fifth Street".42.3 feet to its intersectian with the east line of said
5i 1 ver~•rood Second Addition; thence south 1 ° 11 ' east a di stance of 59 4.7 feet more or 1 ess
point marked "Judicial Landmark ido. 17"; thence continuing south on said line a distance at=
33 feet to the point °f intersection ti•rith said east-ti~rest quarter line, which-point of inter
section is 1100.43 feet east of the southwest corner of Government Lot 5, as shoti~rn by the
plat on file in T°rrens Case dumber 1487; thence east along saki quarter line 278.81 feet
to a point marked "Judicial Landmark ~~°. 15"; thence south 71° 32' east 104.4 feet to point
of be~~inning; except that part of the property hereinbefore described lying north of the
folloti•ring described line: Commencing at a point heretofore described as "Judicial Landmark
t•to. 14"; thence north 13° east 333.15 feet to •a point marked "Judicial Landmark Pao. lII";
:hence continuing on an~extension of said line, a distance of 205.5 feet to the actual-.
p~',t of beginning of line to be described; thence north~~resterly t° a point 42.3 fc:e~: east
o. paint heretofore described as the intersection of the south. line of Sixty-fifti~ Street
as laid out in the plat of Silver rood Second Addition and the east line of Silverwood Secan
~tddition-
~z•th 180.00 feet of Lot A, Silver Wood Second Addition, except that part of
lie above property described in the following paragraph as Tract A.
~' T A
t line of Silver Wood Second Addition
~omrnencing at the intersection of the eas
nd the south 1_ine of West 65~.:h Street. Thence east (assumed bearing along the
.asterly extension of said south line of West 65th Street 42.3 feet. Thence
:ouch 74° 19` 32" east 236.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of the
Bract of land to be described. Thence south 50° 11` 27" west 280.95 feet.
_l~once north 13° 0` east 115 feet to the intersection with a line bearing south-
:rty 74° I9' 32" east from the actual point of beginning. Thence north 74°
_9` 32" ~4~est 251.02 feet to the actual point of beginning.
:1 so including all that part of Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 described as
Yollows:
~.oxunencir~g at the intersection of the easTl~ence east (a ssurleddbear~ng)Aaaongothe
=end the south line o£ West 65th Street.
wasterl.y extension of said south line of West 65th Street 42.3 feet to the ac-
ouch 74°
,.ual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described. Thence s
.9' 32" east 23-6.17 feet. Thence north 5U° 11` 27" west 298.55 feet to the
__.ntersection w~_th a line running northerly from the actual point of beginning
.;nd parallel with the east line of said Silver Vdood Second Addition. Thence
:southerly 127.35 feet along said parallel line to the actual point of beginning.
~;v.bject to wn easement for street purposes only over and across the following
;z- -.gibed property, to wit: Corr~mencing at a point heretofore described as "~?~ud~i-
c,_ _ Lardmar}~ No. 14"; thence north 13° east 333.15 feet to a point marked
'°Judicial Lanc?r;ark No. 18 thence continuing on an exo~ni~°d ~o beidescribed;
cii.stazZCe of 5.7 feet to the actual point of beginning
~.hcnce north 77° yaest, a distance of 30 feet; thence north 13° east, a distance
oz 196.8 feet; thence south 77° east, a distance of 30 feet; thence south 13°
~:est, a distance of 196.8 feet to the point of beginning, as shown in deed Doc.
'~~a. 501976, files of Registrar of Titles.
Passed by the City Council of the Ca.ty of Richfield, Minnesota this 24th
day of October , 1977.
Loren L, Law, Mayor
Attest
~~ 1as Moran, City Clerk
f'
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 330
Agenda October 24, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Authorfzation to Submit Grant Application
The Outdoor Recreation Act of 1977 appropriated $2 , l million to the
Minnesota Department of Transportation for a bikeway grant program.. This
program is to provide funds to local units of government for development of
bikeways along existing road right-of-ways, The grant allocation within.
the seven-county Metropolitan area is $700,000,
The Richfield Eikeway Plan includes three multi-use bridges, one at East
63rd Street crossing Cedar Avenue, one at East 68th Street, crossing I35W,
and the updating of the existing. bridge at West 73rd Street, crossing I35W.
The staff is proposing to submit grant applications for the following three
projects:
1. -The bikeway/pedestrian .multi-use bridge proposed to cross Cedar
Avenue at East 63rd Street would connect East Richfield with the
Taft Perk multi-use trail system. This project would request a grant
of $225, 000.
2, The multi-use bridge proposed to go over I35W at West 68th Street
would connect the Wood Lake , L,/H/N bikeway/pedestrian multi-use
trail with the West Richfield trail system. This grant application
would also request funding of $225,000.
3. There is now a pedestrian bridge at West 73rd Street crossing I35W.
This project would provide for modification to the bridge for use by
bicyclists. This project would request a grant of $125,000.
r Council Letter No. 330 -2- October 24, 1977
It is recommended that the city council authorize the staff to prepare and
submit grant applications for these projects to-the Minnesota Department of
Transportation.
Respectfully submitted,
1.Z ,
~,
~~~
- Wayne S . Burggraaff
City Manager
3 ~ WSB/eja
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
Finance Director
t
w
~
~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~I
~
)n. raw Y
•l~ ,~
-
I '~~l
J LL ~
;
F
''~' ~ tYi{
ln. l a ~!
i ~~~I
Ll k k
L
k- k li ~ `.:e i'~i
CL ~ ~ ~ "~ i9i -ii?
lA,.ln.w~~z .
__
-
__~r_~~~ # iy
f a O ~ ... 9 A
a Y g
l.Y .. a - ~ .,
-~ ~~_ W ~, Z
r ;I ,:
.._ j~ ~ k
G G
k
k
ln. MO'1.llMWl 1 yy /t /
lnr Yr031
~ r~
J L _ ~ i
-~~~ ~ , -
i ~ ~ _
~
ln..,.~
S~ _
--
-,~ -
,
-
N
'OTl
~
-
xR
lM MJ1o I__._
~~C~i1__.~C =- CJ-J~-
,`
-
lnr o'i ___ __ _-~_ ~I~IL___ L~~~ ~ A -l~
"~ J
~lnr riai _
~ ~~~L _
_~~
I j _J II _rr
'
JL~JI~I~
_
lnr arawa I _ __ ~-_ _ _
j
- _ ~ ~ J _._~ I L~ --- _ _
~
,~
~ ~ --~I- ~ ---,~- i "I ter- Jr
~
lM oxrla.o ; r
- I . I
_~- ~~
- _
- _
~
- - _
~~
_
~ - ~ - - -
pf4 _ ,-- - ~~f
lA. w: F _ - --
_ ~
~ i~ _-.
_. - - -
lnr M1YOFiHIY
lAr .xAn,,,e
_
~ .. ~1
~ I ~~ ~ ~
-
_ ~~ ~ i
_ _ _ __
___ ~ _ ~ __ ..
"3A. lx.f.lu
ln. awre f _ ~ _
l _
- .. pB ! ~.
~~
Y
l ~ ~_
l,.
,A.~„r
. ,>
n , ..,r< o Y T
i
~~ ~ - ....,. w '
a ~~-,1
l,. ,.~.,.3 g8 ; ~~ ._..
.`... --
a
i i~.
ln. s 3
!'„~ 3n
lnr il+
~, lAV nlp
~ ln. ,u~r.
11 • on.
~` ~.
I
I
I
j
_ ~
I
I
~ ~
I
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No, 329
Agenda October 24, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject; Purchases in Excess of $1,000
Chapter 6, Section 6.05 of the City Charter stipulates that the city council
must approve the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction
when the amount exceeds $1, 000. There are two such purchases for the public
works department on the city council agenda of October 24, 1977,
Second Exit, Cedar Liquor Store
The State Fire Code and Uniform Building Code require that a second exit
be provided from the basement of the Cedar Avenue liquor store, The Penn
Avenue liquor store was constructed with a second exit, and although modifica-
tions will also be necessary to the Lyndale Store , it is proposed that the work
at that store be undertaken ~•~hen the new commercial building is constructed
north of that store (L/H/N Project). The lowest quotation obtained for install-
ation of a second exit at the Cedar Store was submitted by Earl Weikle & Sons,
Inc, in the amount of $3,865,
It is recommended that the city council authorize wok to be completed by
Earl. Weikle and Sons iri the amount of $3 , 865 for completing a second exit from
the Cedar Avenue liquor store basement,
Survey Truck
Funds are budgeted in the 1977 central garage budget to replace a fully de-
preciated club wagon which is used by the public works department for survey
work ,
6
Since the vehicle bids solicited through the Iiennepin County Cooperative
Purchasing Organization did not include a comparable replacement vehicle, the
Council Letter No. 329 -2- October 24, 1977
city staff has requested quotations, using the existing 1971 club wagon for
trade-in. The lowest net quotation was submitted by Harold. Chevrolet in the
amount of $4,479.
Therefore, it is recommended that the council approve the purchase of a
replacement survey truck from Harold Chevrolet, in the amount of $4, 479 .
Respectfully sub fitted,
Wayne S . Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/eja
cc; Acting. Public Works Director
Finance Director
~d
ti
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 328
Agenda October 24, 1977
The I-Ionorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen;
Subject: Resolution Providing for Polling Places and Designating
judges for the General Election
The city council agenda for October 24, 1977 has on it a resolution
naming polling places and election judges for-the general election on November
8, 1977. There is a provision for placing two judges in each precinct to handle
voter registration on the day of the election.
State law requires that polling places be designated before the election.
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/eja
cc': City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
i ~ - RESOLUTION No.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR POLLING PLACES AND DESIGNATING JUDGES FOR
CITY GENERAL ELECTION, NOVIl~IBER 8, 1977
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, as follows:
1. That there will be a city general election on Tuesday, November,8, 1977.
Z. That said election shall be held at the polling places as herein appear
specified, and that the following are hereby appointed as judges for said
election:
PRECINCT
N0. POLLING PLACE FIRST SHIFT SECOND SHIFT
1 Mt. Calvary Education Bldg.
6541 16th Avenue South
2 City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue South
3 Sheridan School
64th St. at Sheridan Ave. W.
4 Lincoln Hills ,School
75th ~ Penn Ave. South
5 West Jr. High School
74th $ Oliver Ave. South
6 Berea Lutheran Church
76th ~ Emerson Ave. So.
Shirley Gisselauist, Chinn Shirley Gisselauist,Chmn
Patricia Brenner Evelyn Pangilo
Joyce TZorrell Alice Bjerva
Elayne Gilhousen Helen Connelly
Janice Nunn
Vivian Bennis, Chinn.
Ann Burkhardt
John Gera
Bernadette Lais
Gladys Stinar
Joyce Emerson, Chinn
Betty Workman
Donna Peterson
Carroll Noriing
Marcella Okerman _
David Arnold, Chinn
Martha Prottengeier
Jan Bray
Nancy Gleason
Mary Ann Helleckson
Patricia Bunting,
Pat Sazdoff
Ruth Mital
George Hegdahl
Vivian Bennis, Chinn
Dorothy Chellsen
Dorothy Wroge
Arline Wick
Joyce Emerson, Chinn
Ethel Homes
Barbara Belk
Eunice Aulwes
David Arnold, Chinn
Catherine Alfano
Lois Ai-Tes
Phyllis Anderson
Franc Gray
Chinn Patricia Bunting, Chinn
Lois DeSantis
Collette Condon
Chrystal Linn
Alma Zeidler
Geri Stoffel, Chinn
Al Joubert
Elaine Carlson
Phyllis Reinmuth
Margaret Cummings
Gexi Stoffel, Chinn
Nadine Solberg
Carolyn Walker
Kathleen Lecher
~ r
PRECINCT
N0. POLLING PLACE
FIRST SHIFT SECOND SF~IFT
,~ Central School -
72nd $ Harriet Ave. South
8 Fortland School
72nd ~ 4th Ave. South
~9 Assumption Education Bldg.
305 E. 77th Street
10. Centennial School
73rd ~ Bleomington Ave. So.
Donna Vidas, Chinn Donna Vidas, Chinn
Jean Kallstrom Fabeola Sullivan
Lorraine Utterberg Adeline BramNrell
Jane Nelson Jean Lofstrom
Jane Toler Rosemary Reynolds
Beverly Lake, Cwnn Beverly Lake, Chinn
Elaine Zimmerman. Hazel Spear
Martha Siddy LaVonne Nimerfro
Mary Jane Suess Barb Lundeen
Pat Toney Marion Alquist
Betty Obenchain, Chinn Betty Obenchain, Chinn-
Margaret Joubert Sister Kenneth Youth
Gertrude Herll Celestine Dumas
Katherine Nelson Audrey Winslow
Leota Ostlund Joyce P.odeberg
Corrine Cosgrove, Chinn Corrine Cosgrove, Chinn
Susan Lewis Marcia Boler
Marie Gera Marie Ann Calvin
Margaret LaValle Susan Spain
Rosemary Koelln Barbara Cook
' a
Zs ~1~~~~
~~~ ~~, per, ~1A.p~,~,
CPTY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
i;
~ '~l ~ ~, vwnPh+
Council Letter No. 327
Agenda October 24, 1977
The Honorable .Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen: ~
Subject: Appeal of Revocation of Sauna License, Sauna City, Inc.
There is a public hearing scheduled on the October 24, 1977 city council
agenda regarding the revocation of a sauna license issued to Sauna City, Inc.
A hearing was held earlier this. year regarding revo~~atian of .~this~'~license,
based upon a March 3, 1977 arrest of a Sauna City, Inc, employee who did
offer herself for the purpose of prostitution contrary to Richfield City Ordinance
Code Section 10.16 , subd . 10 . At the conclusion of that hearing on April 11,
1977, the council took action to suspend the sauna license issued to Sauna
City, Inc. for a period of four (4j days. The employee arrested during the in-
cident, Ms , Jacquelyn Nuno, .has since appeared in court and the disposition of
the charges against her have been continued for a period of six months to allow
Ms .Nuno an opportunity to enter the DeNovo Project, an offender rehabilitation
program .
The hearing scheduled o'7 the October 24, 1977 agenda relates to a second
incident involving this license, and is completely separate from the council's
previous action suspending the sauna license. On September 12, 1977, the sole
stockholder and president of Sauna City, Inc, , Mr. James S, Jones, was named
in a felony complaint issued by the Hennepin County Attorneys Office. Specif-
ically, two charges are named in the complaint against Mr. Jones, for keeping a
place of prostitution and for pLrmittinq a place of prostitution. As a result of
this felony complaint, I notified Mr, Jones on September 20, 1977 that the license
issued to his business by the City of Richfield was being revoked in accordance
with Section 5.25, subd, 9 of the Richfield City Ordinance Code, in that employees
or agents of said licensee did engage in conduct inimical to the interest of the
public health, welfare, safety or morals; did engage in conduct involving moral
turpitude; or that such employee or agent is a person of bad repute.
Council Letter No. 327 -2- October 24, 1977
s
My revocation action was specifically based on the following grounds:
That on September 12, 1977 Mr.james S. Jones was named in a felony
complaint-warrant charging him with criminal violations in accordance.
with Minnesota State Statute- Chapter 609.32, subd. 3 (1) and 609.32
subd. 3 (2). Both of these criminal charges also-imply a violation of
Minnesota Statute 609.05.
On September 21, 1977, Mr, Jones met with me and indicated that he had
arranged to sell his interest in Sauna City, Inc, to one of his employees, Ms.
Kay Annette Meyer, Mr, Jones feels that Ms . Meyer should be able to continue
to operate the business under the existing license since the sauna license is
issued to the corporation. However, since my revocation of the sauna license
took place prior to the city receiving any notification regarding the sale of Mr.
Jones's stock in-this business, it appears that there is not. currently any valid
license under which the business may continue to operate,
Mr, Ellis Olkon, the attorney representing Ms . Meyer, has -filed notice with
the city clerk that he wishes to appeal this license revocation. Mr, Olkon has
indicated that he will appear before the council to present his appeal during the
October 24, 1977 public hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
~,
~~
Wayne S . Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/e j a
cc: City Attorney
Public Safety Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
~ _ ~~~~
Sw
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 326
~`a_cAgenda October 24, 1977
Subject: Propcsal for General Commercial Planned Unit Development
Hub-Penny Superblock
United National Corporation, Penny's Supermarkets, Inc, and Summit Devel-
opment Corporation have requested a zoning district change from. C-2 to PC-
2 (Planned Commercial) , a special use permit and a preliminary plat approval.
Propo s a 1
The applicants are proposing to redesign, construct and manage various
portions of a commercial "superblock" which includes the following land uses:
1. Mobil Oil station
2. Medical office building
3. Bank and office complex
4. Drive-in bank facility
5. Retail shopping (Hub with add-ons)
6. Restaurant
7. Clark Oil station
8. Supermarket/drug store complex
The PUD is proposed to be redesigned as follows:
Phase I -New Construction and Property Improvement
United National is proposing to construct a 5,000 square foot restaurant at the
corner of 66th Street and Pillsbury Avenue, and to improve the rear parking lot.
The parking lot improvements are dependent on the vacation of 65th Street and
Pillsbury Avenue. The new 65th Street will be constructed by the city on the north
perimeter of the new parking lot.
Penny's Superrriarket is also planning to add space to the parking lot. Clark Oil
Station is proposing to add adrive-up photo shop. The Summit Bank will make
Council Letter No. 326 -2- ~ October 24, 1977
parking lot improvements -both south of the bank and on the vacated 65th Street
as .well as improve the drive-in teller ingress and egress , Phase I is proposed
to be accomplished within the next two years.
Phase II -Construction and Property Improvements
In Phase II, United National Corporation is proposing to add 55,000 square
feet to the south portion of the existing shopping center. This addition will
create a double loaded mall and add 36, 000 square feet of gross retail space...
During this development phase, the south Hub parking lot is proposed to be im-
proved. The Phase II plan. also shows the addition at some future date of 11, 800
square feet to the north portion of the existing Hub. Center, The parking lot will
also be landscaped and median parking lanes provided .
Site Relationships
The applicant's proposal provides for a commercial superblock bounded by
Nicollet Avenue, a relocated 65th Street, 66th Street and the railroad tracks.
The new 65th Street and L/H/N Public Improvement project landscaping will
provide separation between the commercial superblock and the single family
residential area to the north. Public landscape. improvements will be used to
soften the land use relationships between Holy Angels on the south side of 66th
Street and the commercial superblock on the north side of 66th Street. Internal
relationships provide for joint use of parking facilities and cross-driveway access..
Traffic Access and Parking
Pillsbury Avenue from 66th Street to 6-5th Street will be vacated as a public
street, but will be redesigned to provide access from 66th Street. Besides the
Pillsbury Avenue access, the main entrances to the Hub will be from mid-block.
on 66th Street. Left-hand turning lanes will be provided to the mid-block and
Pillsbury Avenue access points.
Nicollet Avenue access will be provided at the vacated 65th Street with the
provision of a left-hand turn lane. Right turn access is also provided to the
front east of the Hub and at a combined mid-block Hub-Summit Bank driveway
access.
Access to 65th Street will be provided at two locations to the north of Penny's
lot and at two locations to the north Hub lot. One 65th Street access point and
one Nicollet Avenue- access point is provided for the Summit Bank drive-through
teller location.
Parking is provided as follows:
Phase I
Summit, medical, Mobil Oil 94 spaces
North Hub lot 180 spaces
Northwest Hub-Penny lot 137 spaces
Council Letter No. 32fi -3- October 24, 1977
Penny lot 250 spaces
Railway right-of-way 13 spaces
Clark Oil 14 spaces
Office 5 spaces
Hub .south lot 618 spaces
Total 1, 311 spaces
Phase II -
All lots same, Hub south lot (418 spaces) `
Total parking after Phase. II - 1,111 spaces
Building additions to be completed in Phase II will reduce
total parking capability by 200 spaces.
3 Staff Review
The following items are attached to this letter and will be referred to
throughout:
1. Site plan of Phase I
2. Site plan of Phase II
3. Utility plan and preliminary plat
4, Elevations southside HUB
5 , Elevations norths ide HUB
6, Redevelopment plan
7. PUD review criteria
This project has been reviewed for compliance with the. development objectives
contained in the Planned Unit Development Ordinance, Chapter III, Part IV, Section
3,34, subdivision 4 and for .compliance with the subdivision regulations, In
addition, the. applicant's proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the L/H/N
Redevelopment Plan, the Urban Design Elements for the L/H/N area and the clty
comprehensive plan.
Relationship to Ordinance and Plans (3.34, Subd. 4 (a) . )
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
Parking - Phase I 5 sp./1000 s.f. GFA
Density - N/A
Setbacks
South front
North front
East front
West side
190 feet
175 feet
18 feet existing
0 feet
Proposed Under PUD
Phase I - 5 ,14 sp
Phase II - sp
3~,9~
,459 floor area ratio
66 feet (proposed restaurant)
175 feet
I8 feet existing
0 feet
Council Letter No. 326 -4- October 24, 1977
The comprehensive plan, as amended by the city council in -June, 1976,
indicates commercial uses of medium to high density on this site. The L/H/N
Redevelopment Plan provides for a development similar to that proposed by the
applicant. It is the opinion of the staff that the proposal generally conforms
to the comprehensive plan and the L/H/N Redevelopment Plan.
Differences between the proposal and otherwise applicable provisions of
the zoning ordinance are reasonable provision of parking spaces, parking lot
circulation, sight distances for businesses, conformance to the parking design
standards of the city and goals of the L/H/N Redevelopment Plan. Although the
overall project is designed in a way to conform to adopted plans, the detail
design (parking aisles, access, lighting, landscaping, pedestrian crossings,
powerpole removal} does not conform to city ordinances for parking lot design
nor to the adopted Urban Design Guidelines for the L/H/N Redevelopment Project.
One of the primary goals of the L/H/N project depends on using urban design
as a means to create a unique shopping environment; a departure from the
urban design element would not be in the public interest and would not comple-
ment the public expenditure which is underway at the present time.
Project Provision for Adequate Public Services -Vehicular Traffic Control..... .
Visual Enhancement (3.34, Subd. 4)
Traffic and Parking
The proposed project was designed to provide improved access from both
66th and 65th Street, and from Nicollet Avenue. The projected traffic volumes on
the surrounding streets are as follows:
New 65th Street - 8,100 ADT
Nicollet Avenue -- 13 , 600 ADT
66th Street - 16,400 ADT
The proposed commercial superblock will generate approximately 8, 000 trips per
day in Phase I (present) and 9, 660 trips in Phase II.
.After reviewing the .parking provisions and parking lot circulation, the staff has
made the following findings:
1. The Pillsbury Avenue entrance is designed with 20 foot ingress, a
four-foot median and 20 foot egress. T~iventy feet is not a sufficient
width to allow turning movements in both an easterly and westerly
direction, and truck turning movements will be limited if a four-foot
median is constructed. Since the 20 toot egress will not function for
both left and right turns with the four foot median, the city staff and
the Hennepin County traffic engineer recommend a 22 foot ingress and
22 foot egress without a median. .
Council Letter No. 326 -5- October 24, 1977
2. .The mid-block 66th Street access provides fora 22 foot ingress lane,
four foot median and 22-foot egress lane. This access will function
adequately for traffic from both east and .west.
3. The Nicollet Avenue access is for right turns only and will function
adequately. The north Nicollet Avenue access to the medical offices
and bank provides for both left and right turns , and will function
adequately,
4. The three 65th Street. accesses provide separate ingress and egress
to key land uses.. The center 65th Street access will provide combination
access to both Penny's and the Hub. The east 65th Street access will
.provide access to the Hub, and, the bank's drive-through tellers, and
the west entrance will provide access directly to Penny's .
The internal parking lot circulation is adequately designed-for the medical
offices, bank, Penny's and, with one exception, the north Hub parking lot. The
design of the Phase. II front parking lot will create the following problems;
1. The driving aisles for 90 degree parking are only 22 feet. This will
not Permit adequate back-around space and could result in traffic lot
congestion,. reduction in usable parking spaces and minor traffic
accidents.
2. The parking area is not designed with the required three-foot concrete
end markers which are required by the planning commission and the
city council in the Urban Design Guidelines. These end markers were
designed to protect the parking area, define the parking area from the
circulation area, and alloweasy snow removal.. In Minnesota winters,
parking in areas without markers becomes confused and haphazard and
reduces available spaces when the parking is most rieeded.
3. The pedestrian crosswalks have. not been designated as required by
the Urban Design Guidelines. Pedestrian access to the shopping area
is an important component of the mid-block pedestrian way, and the
L/H/N Redevelopment Plan. Substantial pedestrian improvements are
being made to the area surrounding the Hub, and it is important that
the Hub carry the pedestrian theme to the door to make it effective for
the entire area .
The sidewalk east of the proposed restaurant is six feet wide,
with only four feet of usable sidewalk, if a two-foot overhang
from parked cars is considered. Such a narrow sidewalk will
limit pedestrian movement on the east side. of the proposed
restaurant; the sidewalk should be widened to eight feet.
After completion of Phase II, 1,111 parking stalls will be provided . This repre-
sents an overall parking ratio of 3.66 spaces per 1, 000 square feet of floor area .
The supermarket which is-the most intensive use, will have direct access to 250
Council Letter No. 32 6, -6- October 24., 1977
spaces or a ratio of 7,43 spaces per 1, 000- square. feet. .The parking. near
the major department store (Korner Plaza) is marginally adequate. A solution
to this problem would be to locate the proposed restaurant further southwest
on the lot, although this could create severe commercial visibility problems
from 66th Street to Penny's Supermarket. The applicant is still working. on legal
provisions for the joint use of parking access, The PUD, as proposed, will not
provide- adequate parking without the ability of a shopper to park at one .location,
shop fn the entire area, and return to the original parking location (joint use. of
parking) , which is a goal of the L/H/N Redevelopment Plan. The joint use of
parking and driveways should help resolve the current parking problems in the
area of the medical office.
Public Utilities
Public utilities (gas., water and sewer) can be provided to the project. Water
is now available in Pillsbury Avenue and 65th Street, When these streets are
vacated, utility easements will be maintained to service the utilities, Electric
utility poles are present behind the Hub.-
Adequate stor;n water drainage is provided in the rear and west side parking lots,
and the storm water drainage for the front parking lot is shown on the plans. Roof
storm water drainage is provided on the new structures.
The Hub is proposing to continue using the power poles on the north side of
the building which is in direct opposition to the adopted L/H/N Redevelopment
Plan and Urban Design Guidelines, The new 65th Street will be a major commer-
cial street, with substantial public improvements being made along. 65th Street,
It is reasonable to expect the Hub and Northern States Power Company to improve
the visual appearance of the north side of the shopping center.
The visual impact of the project will be improved on the south side with the
additions, but will be degraded on the north side unless the power poles are
removed ,
Intensity of Land Us_e
.Gross Land Area: _ 1,433,992 square feet
Gross Floor Area (scaled, does not include
basements)
Summit Bank -two stories, less open covered area 15,000. square feet
Summit Bank -Drive-in -one story 4.95 square feet
Mobil -one story 1, 2 32 square feet
Medical offices -one story 3, 478 square feet
Existing Hub -one story 193,715 square feet
Penny's Supermarket (one story, includes drug '
store) 33, 632 square feet
Clark Oil Station -one story 5 00 square feet
Office -one story 1, 6I2 square feet
Less Mall ~ 2,400 square feet
Total Existing 247, 633 square feet
Council Letter No. 326 -7-
Proposed
Hub Mall -one story
Restaurant -one story
Hub future expansion area -one story
Less Mall area
Total Proposed
Total floor area existing and proposed
Allowed floor area PC-2 zoning District
LUI 52
October 24, 1977
55, 000 square feet
5 , 000 square feet
11, 800 square feet
- 18,000 square feet
52 , 800 square feet
300,433- square feet
658,170 square feet
The PUD ordinance permits a land use intensity of 52; the developer's proposal
is approximately 50 percent less in floor area than the maximum intensity allowed
in the ordinance .
3
Impact of Project on Surrounding Neighborhood
Although generating more traffic, improvements proposed by the developer will
be adequate to handle the increased traffic. Improvements in aesthetic appear-
ance of the area, if accomplished by the developer, will improve the visual impact
of the site .
Staff Recommendation
In judging this proposal against applicable ordinances and adopted plans,
it is the opinion of the staff that the concept of the- proposal generally confcrms
to the Comprehensive Plan, L/H/N Redevelopment Plan and the PUD Ordinance
and subdivision regulations. However, the design detail does not conform to the
Urban Design Guidelines for the L/H/N area, or to the parking lot requirements
of the city. Thus, it is recommended that city council approval of the prelimin-
ary PUD plan contain the following stipulations:
1. That the plan be brought into conformance with the Urban Design
Guidelines of tl~ Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet area
2. That the parking lot be re-designed to effectively park and move
traffic in accordance with traffic design standards of the city
3. That mutual shared parking agreements be established between
' the parties involved in this PUD
4. That a mutually agreeable development schedule be submitted by
the parties involved in the PUD.
Preliminary Plat
It is the recommendation of the staff that the preliminary plat be approved
with the following stipulations:
Council Letter No. 326 -8- October 24, 197.7
1. That storm water drainage be shown on the plan, and if a problem
exists, be resolved.
2 , That the power services to the building be undergrounded and
power poles removed.
3. That the vacation of both Pillsbury Avenue between 66th Street
and 68th Street, and 65th Street between Pillsbury Avenue and Nicollet
Avenue, be initiated by the applicants .
4, That the dedication of a new 65th Street be accomplished by the
applicants prior to the time the zoning di strict change becomes
effective .
Planning Commission Recommendation
At their regular meeting of September 27, 1977, the planning commission re-
viewed the request .for the Hub/Penny/Summit Superblock PUD. The architect
for the applicants appeared before the commission. The commission questioned
whether the design for this project would be comparable to that of the department
store development, whether there would be adequate parking for the medical offices,
whether the service areas would be screened, and whether the existing heating.
system in the Hub would be adequate for the proposed additions. The staff and
the architect indicated that designs would be compatible, the parking would be
adequate, the service areas would not be screened on the 65th Street side, but
would be screened on the 66th Street side, Richard Naiman, United National
Corporation, and Ralph Bruins, Summit Bank, appeared on behalf of the applicants
and expressed their commitment to the project. One resident appeared at the
meeting and suggested a change in the pedestrian system.
The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
preliminary PUD plan with the following stipulations:
1. That the plan be brought into conformance with the Urban Design
Guidelines of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet area,
2.. That the parking lot be re-designed to effectively park and move
traffic in accord with traffic design standards of the city.
3. That mutual shared parking and maintenance agreements be
established between the parties involved in this PUD.
4. That a mutually agreeable development schedule be submitted by
the parties involved in this PUD.
The planning commission also recommended that the city council exercise
sound and reasonable judgment in setting the development schedule for the Hub
PUD, and that the city council approve of the zoning district change from C-2.
to PC-2.
Council Letter No. 326 -9- October 24, 1977
The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
preliminary plat with the following stipulations:
1. That storm water drainage be shown on the plan, and if a problem
exists, be resolved,
2. That the power services to the building be undergrounded and power
poles removed.
3. That the Hub hook up to city water and abandon the existing well.
The .planning commission also recommended that the city council approve the
special use permit for this PUD.
Summarv of City Council Actions Reauested
1. Action on the Preliminary PUD Plan and first reading for the zoning
district change.
2. Action on the preliminary plat
Respectfully submitted,
~.
~~~
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/eja
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
pl
l
~+~ n .
D ~'° ~ '
±'~r4d+~
L'- ln'~'~".
r---
r----------i -~
Cr
J
u
(pN1~GGL D'Vf+f~M,ENT (..
f
--- a
3
+'
I`
I`~
I
u tao~n ~'
y
~~~
I
~ ~~
I
• ~~' ~ ,
;a, L-1 ~ a~ I,~ a~-~-- -~ Q~ __~ __
,
~
~ I ' k e
_.
z; _
~~
a;
QQ ~ _' N; i-~ -- _ _
N; --
~ _
~
r
_
.
~ w' ~
I ~~
i . ~
_I ~ i
1 ~
--
~ ~~_-+-~ W`
_ 3 . _ ,
~
~ ~ ~ __~
-_
.
I ~-y
_
~
~
~~ n
~-1 ,
.. .....
I
i
i
~ ~I
I i ~,
~
DATA
~ca~erHe 6wu.ror~c.aru%r..
WL~
~
~~
j ,-, ~
!
i ~ ~ I _
~ ~
~
.J ! .. ..1
~ y.. ~
~
-~ ~ -- _
_
J
~~ r--e~
~ _ ~n_rw ~.a _ - -
LW'7 4alA
LiK'N +C'I~.M' UNrY/,
~
I .~ J ~
.._
1 JJII
1 1
it
1 ~ ~ .. __ ~ mM1 ~ .. 1 -- _ _ _.__. ..
.. . . _ -
~ ~ kA * 4'R°C11' /4L SI! M e Iw+
'
q. -i -
. ~ . ' ~ ~~-' ~ WE5T 65TH ST } _
:
._ _ ~ R#N.iMD M51 I/tl of lGl,+r)'b~/'. f.Y
- -- -- -
r
.
! __...__ ~
~` p
u r 0.ucxNp ~~:n
-
~, « ~ i I , i I i i I i~ I ~ i , ,
!
I. „~ ~>~'. ~~'~°ro ~
i T -y-
\~~ -- :~ T - - -
r1 ~ y~ r ~ ~~~~ a' r Jc x a r' .
jJ -~..._i;.~.._._..~.....J~.._-~~LJ _.._'~ .tom."- ~~~- -- -- - _ -
ara
~^~~ _
., .. f ._.. ~
I
~ drive•In
.
_
v_u-+
-- -
~,. „
y
ttati0n
_ 0
_ _.
'1111°..
q
~ ~
.
_
~
~
- Mx1 I ~,_
~~. _. -
~tc... -. -~.
EAST 85TH_ST. _ -
C4'S7p~(y [NO'j MN (MM'1Y
:a rew+rr~ ce~at :n+i rma,
rE.w+4 r6.~a7E~a If.~s4
6'?wui 5'+"'_ D1v[ In. e,N
G~M+ 6rn+a 1. ~t
avf'. r.~is_
+aw.. w sr.1 /a n
~
7 Y
n
1
_. __ ~ ~ro,a
,r
~
~ 1 --- 'e
- -
-- . ~
1.1;.1a1'.L
" .
, - Ma9~u Karov
.
`' i I 1 ~ I i h I I ~ ~1 ~I ~ aummN atah
- `
`-~ "~ ° baNc `~`
~~
~ ~ I '~ ~,
~ .i j }""' n a`,v
~ ~" ~'~ ~, ! ~
HUB
~,
i I nt. _
~
c
- ,I+. +
w..e _ it I I
6 ~
I , • N.
~
~
+ 96^b ~aa^'G
F9ny MYK ~
.__ i ~
Y
7
/ `
. 1
- NINW9 NOig9 67+N7~{~ l.M
Nvt7.W b
f!fIGG dE b'FL . UK f~".J6
~
~"l~'~' ~ 7
I ~
~ /{• • _
~ ~ ~ ~~
i
/ y_
z .~~ Mn0 1.71 Gi MM1
1
-~
;~I y
~ \
~r .t ~ II-L~ ~
Ty ~{_ + ~
/ ~j ELI III~III'~~II~II~IIIII IIU ~ `~,/
'~
~
.._.... -
I
~
'lpYN'f (JiM t•IWn1 •*Kh
r
'
a
~ ~
~ ~
~
:
..\ ~ .
6K
1
2
•L
!'
F .s-.v~`
~ ~~~~~~{{I{{II I}~I}I}I}I}It II+f {{III}}I{{~~ jjI }}II}}IIfIf IhI}}I}Ifj { ~}}
l
l~
a
~
I~I ~
~
~~
~
}
1
~
~ .. __ -.. ....
~ u"'ow''`aa~y,«~,~r ~
i
~
1
market
werW
' 'p
! I' 1 nc,+- llll
l
lll
lll Illlli
l
ll i
I'lll
l
uII11
IIII1
~wvtl mtvNp wr \ ..
kwn ~ ac raw
~~;~
--`
1 1
~
l
~
_
~ ~ y
1 s~' «rrcv. ~n~~. ror~a2 Uva.
bxl w.u 'l'!
a iN.~N, f'a.)
WN1~+'nfl. (U
fU2 :3,WfMGtYk 0.+5.2 Pbfi1M1'Ua5
K dr fCW^'
` ~/ ~~ ~
+ n ~
Ii ~ r ~Ir~I~ 7~
~vr~ Irk r
, ki l 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I
i i I I I 1~ I I 1 I I I I I~I ~~
~ ~ ~--7
~-~ ~ _
~0 crl ~t+lE L6+ 5'k:a,M
' 0}} ~ l' Clad( atat~IMl ~
o o _ ~
I ~
_ r
X V'M
I 11 ~
' I 1
~
~
~ ~ NEL uEM' klN4~ ~ 4. ~ib• Cw
N7C-Wil-'d oe1^W (*6~ ,M6v %
llh2~ r.R~h~G 7 _'OKe !OF*
I ~ ~ ' O o
" {
1
I;' 1 I I I I I ~ ~ (I I!
I wt
c+i
J ~ J
~ HrrnNer+ y. mrm ~ra+.v
- Ia3 . . Mf.•kOr._6r+~N +N_A~.w'G_
..
_ _ _ _.
wesT ssTH sr, a _
- ~-- - . ~
''
~~ ~
~
r ~ (I
KA7+Ny b M MM.Y MCl1/1 ii I
~
- ~ -, ~ ~
a
i, ~ 1(
w~ ~ -_
al a ~-~-- QI
~
f
~
~ ~ t
_ a~ _
l .
~ - -----
.
-
~ }I I
=
LF- n
Z. I I ~ ~I Ll I F-
I
~ ~~ r-- ~ ~ ~ -i ~ r
J i ~ W i
l y ~
I--_+ ~ d J. I ~
~______.~
-'Lj .._..f. 0 r - J-~ I I
~
~
_ _ ..-
~-
J, ~ ~ ` J ~ i ] z
J L
f' -- ~
~ ri~!_~ Ji ~_~ ~ l
I~ I I ~
~ ~ ,ll ~
I , DATA
~~(i~.:~i'4 ~.Wb ~Ob~•e.E.7. }~fc!W
,7
--
_
-
,I t __
~--y ~
~ I 1
Ll I
- IF-~I
~-yyI I
~
J -
~
~~
_.___; ,n
_ ~.,~~,I ~,_ ~..
-- ~ ~
!
~ ~~i~
j' (
4
1
~ J
_
L
i,
~.
li~
I _ ' ------
I
r
---'
~
_.
i
._
I--- _ ~ ~r ';; _
'D'' '
rn:.v~wlroa;I,a,•la..•a3a~
-~:
~
_
:_+ -
WEST 65TH ST.
I .- •-
J.~..i
I ~ ~ ~--~-- r i ! I I i ~I i ~ ~ j I ~ i .
~ __
drive•in d. ~ I~
I
• mobil a' _ ~ --- _ -- -----
a~,'e _ ~-, - --
Eti Y 5~si h!E* 'wb!
i i
c -
i \ ,
,. _
__ - ~ - _
~ l tf. SIAtNNI ..J
. .
.~
t.
_l
EAST 65TH S .
_ -
~
~~ Ili 3 bC `B Cd .i .1i+8 h~ 1
i ti~
__ - ro _ ~
I;~
:ll
•9 ab al- id No K ~'
a_ `
-
:~ d '' ! I l l l i °~ i. l i l` I I I I I
~
~ _ ~ III i~ /j,
// // / ~ wrn
/.• - / / ( ~ l
-
-
_
~-'~, - summit state
-_ bank
_
W
'
i ._....
.. .. _. f-"'
t~k. bo ocn to r
- . T. dfiz-~. •+! r~ x •-
IC'NE b'0~4 ~ ) 1 Ion
E
~=
I ::
- _
Ili
- - I ~ ~ /
~
~ ~ ~''
I /
HUB
Sfg
anf
~a~re
1
_
~
LIJ1~iLLL l -- Q
W
I
. _ ..
~
. ;
~~~ r ~! ~+ a :., --- -
, oq a 9~ ...;o . Yl 9si K i" GG
~
i I! I ~ l i l l l ~ ~, e
.b:7+e C
~ , Io ~W~ • !,~ ~ a
~ _- _
~
l~'~ ~
dNQ I ~ I ~ ~ ; ~ ~~ i
T*1TT ' • '~ i
i .i'
- ~ ;., ~ ,M.. p (.
L+,.S:.-a 'k'3fG
•r i! fNf xo e
~''~I"'I' ~ ~ ~ "
~ ~ ~
4, sw
% ~ proposed addiflon ~ ~
~ I
~---. : -
'o
~~ _
. I
~I 1 I ~I'II~
inI' ~ I{ I I ~ I I
~
I
~ ~
~
~
-~ ;- n ~
- ~ ~ ,~ ~ b. ~ ~~I
fir. ,.h ',.~ l„ ~
'l9 I~ ~`D ~ w~ ' Z
- ` ' ro lAC YJ. ~
'
~
~ ~i I ___.__ ._ __
~ ~Y
W+rffli•~roee7 cH r'OwYia•~YaY.
~ t•r3yy• Fldr 6b.ri GV1!
N7 Cn~
~
6n G:4
'A
S
~ ~
C
V C
~
I
i I
Ilgl i1Gt i t~ (I ,l~I I~ Ir 1I ~
it
~
~ N
Y ~'
YO i') (~f ~I w _ _ _ _ - _ _ ~
i _ !
\~
-
0 ~ ~
[ .~._.-~..
p ..
r
.w
~
rs
.
LX, l
IYI~ri! Y ~rY_.l%Vj
l0."h3l .:6I
O ~ G_
(y
I , `W
I I I
~
i,
I ~
. j -
~
-- - _- - - -- - -
- _-
-
99
I -J _ '-'t _ - ~ - _ _ jly~I
stauraM
-1 *'~x aE r` --~ ~ ^_ -• "
4
~
~
&
-
E91 y.~
d-' .' .1 I
,I~(/
MO':::r.,tilinnl a^zY. n~b':cu ..K
iii GG,~-•
OH. [#N7F~~ Vi
(~y/~~CCC
att• I I I ~ ~ Clark atatbn 3
. Y "t ~~ 4Je V. %.Y L_I! V _tid
Y_% M
6M 1.% K h N !
~~~ ~ ~ T ~1 ~ . ~ - fl ~ - -
• +sr, ~- rvlc~ ~,< a.•a+ +ar. ~®
• ~ ~~
,,. '
... - _..
..
WEST 66TH ST, _
~i, 7w~wag acav Po ..nau.-E
~ ~ ~3 ~ ~~ >~ ~ ~~
, ~ , .
__. ~
a
- ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i a
'~ ~
,-
W , N
~!
_. -_ _1 _-I , __..
~~ ~-_-- ~ ~ ~. __ I ~,~ ----~--~
QI ,~, Q
I ,
I ,
-~ ~ Id lu I
I~~
~ ~ ,~ ~ ~
i~ ' 13
d ~ ~
I
•• p !%I4TIN4 WLtT i4M. LTREfiT lE•O•WAV ~~ of
C R • ~ ~ YIGb
pa uTl
.. ~ •• P¢EPOSlD PfaPERT- Yom- -~ ~ V PII2roTW T
D4D CATI N PDR NfiW {Ta;iT PURPOafi{
'n~STIW 2ELfAWU{ KE.ot•-
PROPOfEO ~'
•• R•o~ Y 9 i 1~ ~~ J NlW PrtenATY l.IN6~--- i I ( ' Mfi6
Yi `OFF.
_ I I I DRIVi UP M
ol~ i 16ANK 0~
I P(LEPDi[D
r` _`~ 1E Ui UTV ~ '
I InA Vnluf FASU+,RNT kA' P O aE0
lo'Nnurr
_ .. .. .. a,.~cASwEUr'
u ixILT IN6 4TOAM SWER ~ ~ I _
w - .-____
~_--- - -- u ~R -~--- ~q ert PROro{fiD NEw-
!a so~'.. .__fN.TI••• a., xa _ .}~ _ NTILITYEA{EMDIT
__ P6LYna60 r
--r~~P~w-~- ~' I ~ N WUTIUTY I f4 ~ SUMMIT
q'fA{irnlNT ( •EA{fiMiNT ~ TINE STATE 6ANK
I) I siluiTE as wAV Tlx ~~ Jnuna.y~
PaoPOS~D is eE uT T sr cnlanND JI Ilt
~, ~ vrcATED ~ P' 4..aanauYS ~ .!
{ ~i I I i E%KTluc a.¢iNiiio
I I I WAteA SERVIG6 ~ EXISTIAIG
finlanu° rowa¢ HU6 I
I Pas(TYrvfAL~gP)/~,} SHOPPING ••~
tio' : •~ -••L11.14•-.• ' ,] , I - ~T CSNTER
M1 io
Q ~ I) •••260.0• -
'~ Q DRUG I i P ' - ~O ~/\,Y YTiilTifi
l) y~'
Q4U { I I l l
R I ~JP E~RPOSED uiK O20N I
RRRR LL~~~~ y,1 ~kIEO b9
I ~ T" I k A~~p PY /~ ~ ~, ~
E~ aff%KTUIi ~~'~ ~ ~ ~/
p ~ ~) ~ ua{fugra ~ n ~~ 3~'.~Sc
IP1 ¢I ~ A? / w L
x ~ ~~axKTluE ~~+9 II G~~j \
'~ raPat~O TOK /'
-.-
_~ -
L._ -
MD011.
SfiRVIC!
STATION
I'
P'ENNYS v 1aD i
MAWaET N, , ~N. ~ I ~ I e~
- ~R~WGT
Y 1TD¢M SEWER
usEV,EUT GAc
r
r N
) - ~PiGro
WOPERiV UNG ~ ~1
VMTE¢
I ~PROPOSiD
v
I NfW UTILITI64~~"~
I
P
••lLI.1•~_
I
- I
x I e I
~ M -
Y
_
OFF
GU I I PROPOaaE ^~6xI4TlN4
~ PRAIViiO
SWI
. Y Ew
. _
16 ST
AT CN g I I ~W UTIUTII{ U
s ai I 5411TAAV XwaA T
.
~ I)
o ~
I
I ao~ nwulf
o I
_..
o.a•_.
°-~ _~WEST ii 5T 26ET_~,
_ __
~ -- .
I \ I
I
I I
I
I i .. ~.
I
I ~,
I
t
finriTING~
s.NmAV+{n4AT I
yI I1: fNO.. ..
_i j IM a_ a a~
° - RA4T 4sa sTrsEi
CfiNTfiC POINT of
SECTION 27 IN TRAET =!
OF RANEE L4.
_-
S
C
r~' ~~_
~. r ~~ i~ ~i ~ ~ H { r ~Z
_. .
r
_._ _
_ _ _-~_
II~~ ~:
,..
_ 1--. _ ~
--_ --- -
-~~ ~j
9
e~~~6
(;,, ~~i
~~. ~~r'
4
~4
~~
G-. i
,'
;r >_
~z
?;
~,E
KEY PLAN
w wU
• -1 ~.
.~
m
,. o
~'
Y ,
~ J
\
, ~
- -. ~
.
~~ 4' p~
I ~g (~ ~ r .
~ _.._..
I I I 1 i
~~~JJ/~)J
J_ ~ -
C
~O
t
0
C Q$q
V _* J
C EI
s11
W
,.
'.~ 1
,~J
~I,~a
~~si~~~
~4~
0
a ({~(~
~~~f6.
F
3i
7
~+
V
0
C
I
r
N
V
C
L
_ ~
~~
~~ ® a
~~
L E G A L N O T I C E
NOTICE OF HEARING ON REZONING, APPROVAL OF FINAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND ON SPECIAL USE
PE~iMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMEFIT
NOTTCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the City
Council of the City of Richfield at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, October 24, 1977 in
the council chambers of the city hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South, to hear
reasons for or against the following:
1. Rezoning from General Commercial (C-2) to Planned Unit
Development - General Commercial (PC-2)
2. Approval of Final Planned Unit Development Plans.
3. Approval of Special Use Permit for Planr_ed Unit Development.
for the following described property:
1. Blocks 1 and 2, Richfield Plaza, according to the plats on
file in the offices of the Register of Deeds and Registrar
of~Titles, part of Block 2, being Registered Land as is
evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 195775•
2. Plat 44827, Parcel 2172. The South 183 feet of the East
X7.9 feet of West 72.9 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the.
Northwest 1/4 except road.
3. Plat 44827, Parcel 2165. ^ihe South 150 feet of the East 255
feet of that part of the Southeast 1/~+ of the Northwest 1/4
lying West of Richfield Plaza Addition .and the North 33 feet
of the South 183 feet of the East 142.5 feet of that part of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest l/4 lying West of Richfield
Plaza Addition except roads-.
4. Plat 44827, Parcel 2180. Commencing at a point in East line
of M.N. & S. Railway right of way 183 feet North from South
line of Southeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 thence East 47.9 reet,.
' thence South 33 feet, thence East 112 i/2 feet, thence North.
' 33 feet, thence East to center line of Pillsbury Avenue, thence
North.. 302 feet, thence West. to said right of way line, thence
South to beginning.
5. Plat 46260, Parcel 9000. Block 3 of Richfield Plaza Addition,
6. Plat 46260, Parcel 6000. Block 2 of Richfield Plaza Addition.
7. Plat 46260, Parcel 3000. Block 1 of Richfield Plaza, Addition.
d 2
8. Plat 44827, Parcel 1951. The North 60.6 feet of the Soutr~
511.6 feet of the E~.st 175 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 except road.
9. Plat 44827, Parcel 1901. Commencing at a point in the East
line of the Northwest 1/~+ distant 511.6 feet North of the
Southeast corner thereof, thence West 175 feet parallel. with
the South line thereof, thence South 60.6 feet parallel with
the East line of the Northwest 1/4, thence West 125 feet to
the West line of the East 300 feet of the Southeast 1/~+ of
the Northwest 1/~+, thence North 218.98 feet along said West
line thereof, thence West to the West line of Blaisdell Avenue
extended,thence North along said extension to North line of
South 53 and 1/3 rods of the Southeast 1/~+ of the Northwest
1/~+, thence East 162.26 feet along said North line, thence
South 186.2 feet parallel with the East line of the Southeast
1/~+ of the Northwest 1/~+, thence East 198 feet to the East
line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/~+, thence South
-174.3 feet to beginning except road.
10. Plat 46128, Parcel 9000. Tract., C, Registered Land Survey
No. 692.
11. Plat 46128, Parcel 6000. Tract B, Registered Land Survey
No. 692.
All persons interested in the rezoning, approval of final Planned Unit
Development Plans and on the Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
for the above described property are hereby notified to be present and they will
be heard.
Thomas J Moran City Clerk
(Publish: October 12,.1977)
7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, 1VIINNESOTA
Office. of City Manager
Council Letter No, 325
Agenda October 24, 1977
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of t he City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Authorization to Advertise for Bids
There is an item on the October 24, 1977 city council agenda providing for
city council authorization to advertise for bids for general liability insurance
and for worker's compensation insurance, The city's present three-year contract
for general property and liability insurance, and the one-year contract for worker's
compensation insurance , will both expire on December 31, 1977 .
It is recommended that the city council authorize this advertisement for bids
Respectfully submitted,
~/ .w'~
tl~~
Wayne S . Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/e j a
cc: Administrative Assistant
r ' ~~• -
CITY OF RICHFIELD., MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Storm Sewer Easements
Council Letter No. 323
Agenda October 24, 1977
During construction of City Project No. 686, the 1977 street improvement
project, the city obtained storm sewer easements from the Metropolitan Air-
ports Commission in the vicinity of the Rich Acres Addition. These easements
were necessary for storm sewer extensions on MAC property. It is now nec-
essary for the council to formally accept these easements before they are
recorded. Maps showing the location of these easements are attached.
It is recommended that the city council accept and approve recording of
these storm sewer easements .
Respectfully sub fitted,
~~ l~ ~.
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB/eja
cc: City Attorney
Acting Public Works Director
-~_
V
~'
-_.` ,w~~t=mot - ¢ o. - ' ~ E[~
• '" T . .. t
+ ~ ~ ~ ~ t.
. _..... ,.~...~ i!~ c r N ~ .. ~
z N.. `. ~ ~ ..:
. -- w ~ L
i ~•~
... _ .
' ~
~ n
~~ ,,. ~ '<
•- coo
.
..~~.. ~ _ ~ . ~ .
s o ~ o:
~ ;
w
.
~
v i
~c
:l € C.~.
~~
O
' ~ :} ~ ti V t
.
~
..~ ,'.. .. .. ... ' tel. i~S ~ ~ i... _. ... ~ .
~
13 ~ HS 3 ~'
~~'' ~ s
SLZ t
' , ,;~~
/
~
1
~~ ..i
u ~ '3
~ ~. 9LZ 13: - ~7S - - .'-
~K• r -. .. O .`~
, - r
' ,fie ••~ - - - r ~ `~ ~ .1
~ C.1 _ { ~ ~ ° ~C
'- c~ ~ :.
~' - s - J N i-•- J i -
.; - • C/9 O ~ :\; a .i
s 4O}'. .~
. "ter' II 4~..,~ 1 ~ •~ - :a i~ O
~ „ . -`~ ' ~
,.• ~ a_, _
k Z1~ ~itl$fJr }' .._ s i i i~ c
` __
~ L,t.S NtlC ~r. - •
,..... ~ , ~ ( r ~ ~
• . ..__ _. 1 4 S'' . i