Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02-13-78 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 41 Agenda February 13, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Special Use Permit and Off-Street Parking Contract -for a Public Garage and Car Sales Lot, Lindahl Olds Mr. Wally McCarthy, representing Lindahl Oldsmobile, Inc. , has requested a special use permit and off-street parking contract to allow the operation of a garage and car sales lot on property located at 1918-1924 W. 78th Street and 7745 Morgan Avenue South. Section 3.33 of the Richfield zoning ordinance requires that a special use permit be obtained to operate a public garage and car sales lot in a C-2 general commercial district. The following items are attached to this council letter and will be referred to throughout: Exhibit A -current zoning of the site and surrounding property Exhibit B -current land use in the area Exhibit C -site plan submitted by Mr. McCarthy Exhibit D -zoning ordinance regulations relating to public garages and car sales lots Exhibit E -letter from Mr. McCarthy to the planning commission Zoning Ordinance Requirements This request for a special use permit must be judged by the conditions estab- lished for public garages and car sales lots in Section 3.33, subdivision 3 and Section 3.41 of the zoning ordinance (Exhibit D) . The city council should approve issuance of the special use permit only. if the applicant proves that these conditions required by ordinance will be satisfied. Background Lot size: 134.52' x 205.65' (27, 664 square feet) Building size: 8, 930 square feet Zoning: C-2 general commercial Council Letter No. 41 -2- February 13, 1978 Surrounding Zoning: N-general commercial E-general commercial W-general commercial S~I494 (general commercial in Bloomington) Present Land Use: Five commercial uses and an unimproved parking area Surrounding Land Use: N-existing Lindahl Olds E-existing Lindahl Olds W-retail sales and business S-I494 right of way The proposed use would create but minimal traffic hazards or congestion by turning movements into or out of the site. The site will be used for vehicle storage rather than for employee or customer parking, which will mean fewer turning movements will be generated. All driveways into and out of the site will be located more than the 40-foot minimum distance from an intersection that is required by ordinance. The driveway closest to an intersection will be located 60 feet away from the intersection of Morgan Avenue and the frontage road. The driveways will not encroach upon neigh- boring property. The zoning ordinance for this land use requires that one off-street parking space be provided for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. The building on the site has a gross floor area of 8,930 square feet, which means that a minimum of 45 parking spaces are required. The applicant has indicated on the site plan (Exhibit C) that 46 off-street spaces will be provided, one more than is required. The spaces provided will be 9 feet by 19 feet, rather than 9 feet by 20 feet, which is the usual size for parking spaces. Part of two parking spaces, some barrier curbing, and a chain link fence is shown located within city right-of-way along Morgan Avenue. The area in front of the buildings and within the property lines will be used for display of automobiles. The display automobiles are to be parked in the same fashion as display autos are parked in front of Lindahl Olds existing buildings to the east of the .proposed site. City ordinance requires that areas not used for buildings, driving, parking or pedestrian traffic be landscaped. -The proposed site will be almost entirely hard asphalt surface. There will be a landscaped area at the corner of Morgan Avenue and 78th Street which will contain a sign and various plant materials. Because this land- scaped area is located within the 50-foot area at an intersection which ordinance requires must be kept clear of visual obstructions, the sign and plantings will be placed so as to not present any visual barriers. Signage on the site will consist of a pedestal-type sign in the landscaped area which, as described, is in compliance with the sign code and sign bands along the south and west faces of the building. The sign bands continue the theme of the sign bands on the existing Lindahl Olds buildings and would also be in compliance with the sign ordinance. Coun cil Letter No. 41 -3- February 13 , 19 78 Exterior lighting on the site will be placed and focused so as to sufficiently illuminate the site for security purposes, but to not be a nuisance to adjacent properties or create traffic hazards on adjacent streets. The site plan indicates that the parking area will have barrier curbs, and concrete car stops along the perimeter of the lot as required by ordinance. The site plan also shows that the required sidewalks will be constructed along building frontages. There will be two-way traffic on all driving lanes on the site. The driving lanes and driveways are 24 feet wide, which should be adequate to handle traffic on the site and prevent traffic from creating undue hazards in the public right-of-way. The comprehensive plan indicates that this area is best suited for mixed land use, high density. Although the land use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan, the proposed site is not a high density land use. Staff Review and Recommendation The applicant has submitted a site plan for the property indicating that the existing buildings will be used for expansion of the Lindahl Oldsmobile sales floor and office space. The parking area behind the buildings will be used, for a car sales and storage lot and not at the present time for any employee or customer parking. The additional parking area may relieve some of the company's storage problems, but will have little effect on traffic congestion problems on 78th Street, because employees and customers will still be parking on that street. Lindahl Olds will move the existing curb cut on Morgan Avenue, which is only seven feet away .from the inter- section of Morgan Avenue and 78th Street, to a point which is approximately 60 feet from the intersection. Moving this cut will provide better access onto Morgan Avenue from the property and serve to eliminate some traffic congestion problems at that intersection . To fit the required number of parking spaces on the site, the applicant is proposing parking stalls which are one foot shorter (19 feet) rather than the usual 20 foot -length. Reducing the length of the parking stalls means that parked cars will be closer to the driving lanes, which could create difficulty in backing out of the parking stalls, and could generate more traffic congestion on the lot. However, the applicant is providing the proper 24-foot driving lanes, which should alleviate potential congestion . The site plan indicates that the applicant will be encroaching two feet upon public right-of-way with two parking stalls along Morgan Avenue. This means that if, at some future date, the city wished to use that right-of-way for street, sewer, Pedestrian, landscape, or other improvements, Lindahl Olds would lose two parking stalls, and would then be in violation of the special use permit and off-street parking contract if they are granted in the proposed form. The staff feels thatit is necessary to insure that there are adequate parking spaces and sufficient sidewalks on the site for pedestrian movement and that this minor encroachment upon the right-of-way is less serious than a reduction in parking area would be. Council Letter No. 41 -4- February 13, 1978 Parking lots tend to provide a negative visual impact to their surroundings . It has been a policy of the city to require landscaping around the perimeter and on the interior of parking lots to help screen and reduce these negative visual impacts. Landscaping indicated on the Lindahl Olds site plan will not effectively reduce negative visual impacts. They do indicate that athree-foot black vinyl coated chain link fence will be installed around the perimeter. If properly maintained this fence will provide screening to reduce some of the negative visual impact of the parking area. The proposed fence is, however, five feet into city right- of-way on Morgan Avenue. Even with these shortcomings in the landscaping and parking lot design, it is the opinion of the Planning Director that the criteria have been met for issuing a special use permit and an off-street parking contract for operation of a public garage and car sales. lot. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission reviewed the request for a special use permit to allow a car sales lot and public garage at 1918, 1920, 1922 and 1924 West 78th Street and 7745 Morgan Avenue at their October 25, 1977 meeting. The attorney for the applicant, john L. Pureter, gave testimony. No other property owners appeared at the meeting. The planning commission recommended city council approval of the special use permit for a car sales lot and public garage at 1918, 1920, 1922, and 1924 West 78th Street, with the stipulation that all conditions for a special use permit be met. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council take the following actions: 1. Approve issuance of a special use permit to Lindahl Oldsmobile, Inc. for operation of a public garage and car sales lot at 1918-1924 W. 78th Street, and 7745 Morgan Avenue; 2. Authorize the city manager to execute an off-street parking contract with Lindahl Oldsmobile, Inc. in accordance with the plan submitted by Lindahl Oldsmobile, Inc. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggra~'f City Manager WSB/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director Public Works Director ~, r .) ~ ~~• ~ ~Z ~•; :rye 3 .L- ~ 34V.r ` ; ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ea ~o e • - } -~~ ~ Y f ~ ~ r . • 3o J: ~ sue. :: ~,` a ! ,6 ? .nl ~ r ` 7 f. . r.' S' - ~r ~' !. 1~ ~ :L.i 3 1 33 R,g .._ .i3:t2 _._ •~ ~IiP'_ i ~ ~ iza, ~ ! 37 e- ~.... t_f.11 .fA§h: r~ t t i 1« } ~. ~~+ f -~~_ry_,~C ~ ~ 1 ~--~--t•-~ ~sy_~ a ~ ~ c . ~ 1 -1-T--- - ~:~ . . ,!;~ ~ ~~.JJ.to ~~ _ `t~.SidZ • h „ _ =,~r~ 2~ ~ -_~_. _ - - ~~`°2 . „•rt a ~:~~ J ~ ~ 1 R f . P • ! ~ 5 { .Sr.u 2.1 - V i ; a {+ <<.r ~s ~ ~ ... ,_.T._. _:.r:.._ ~C_ _.~_ .... _ - _.__ t~3F~ 1 . r-1--.~ ~~ ~1 T-^+-=~ V ~~ L_ 1 ...r~.~~...rn , --.,,...... i; .~.........•-r~~:: 4 .y,.r..,....---.-~, ..~r.....~......... a ~--^-~ Y~ _;;<{„ •----- '~-_~~t~ i i..vx'~ ~F ~:~!'~vc~ d` --- -~i--i'~iY1 f~ .~. r.~ .^., ~i-_~.~.~.~~~..-.~~`--' ~~-_~__.~ ~_~~ _ - - ~ GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL ~~~~ LiM1TED BUSINESS MULTIPLE RESIDENCE 1 _....,...,..._...,_..~ . I. O ~ ..e.._. O ~ ~~, ~ r. +< Q r r• N f~ 1 Q N ^^ N Q Q O M I ll~~~~ ... Q tD ~, Q v ~. 7 F 2 r~ .., s -- 3 ~- ~~-- ~~, ~~~--`~,,~~~ 5 -1~.~ ~` ~~~~ ~~ ~~,7° -- -+ 8 .~ , -. 9 ~ . . kAJ ~~ r ~ i ~7 tD : - ~ ( v ~ U ~ ,. r J ~~ p r /1 --~' -~ __. ~ i-l I ~ ~ , _ i -~ /.t ~- ~ i ~. ; o _ 1 N ~ - k~ N - `~~2~ , ~ - ~~ 5 C.1~+~~ .~ ~ ~ s~~~~ ,~ ~ ~a~ ~ ~y :., a `_~ J' f " _ 7 :Q ~ .) i 11 1 0 2 Q~, ~. r ~~ 3 C. ~ 4 ` N r• Q tD t,l ~ (~ ~ ~1 41 9, ~ f ~ ~~ za~a 2t:<, zoo• ~6~~ {{ • i o :=,~• ti ~. . ~ [' u Q r ~ 75 °~ pa ~~ w~ ~1- ._..,p. ~L.1l_..J' tsu N..,J ~ ~ +. ~ N ~N 7S2i ~ ~ -R1 ~ ~ ~~ ~o M ~ ~~ JJ rn ~~~ fd30 ., ~~ ~ Q ~, ---~ i 4 ~ ~ 5 0 ~ ~_ Q `°x.1920 ~~~~ n f8i0 S 1.. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ z,~ i f. _~ ; b `~ t~ I ~r ~ pvy~ ~~ _ `~ - _ 1 ( ~, r r~ ~^- ~~~ ~~ ~~{ ,~ ~: .-- ~-~ F"- J ~ t ~ --z n ~ ~~ . -. r.-D • S~: C_ u~ ~~ m .J ~ ~ L !.~ ~ . n .r ,?'. ~rt-1 b I, t L 7~ NIGH ~ iLACK VtMTL ~ CHAIN LINK f[MCE Wally . LINDAHL OIDS BODY SHOP McCarthy's ~ I Z - . ~~ L I A L ' ~ I ~ L IGN ~ ' d - , I ' I t9' ; , . ii ~` ~ , DRAINAGE '1 9 ~/- ~- Z~~ TWIN CITIES ~ . t-i BARRIER ee ~ - UGNT w - -~ - - CON ~ BETE BARR E RS , 2.~ ~, O p O ~- O 4~J _ - ^ NI a o o ~~;h ' Ea ~ ~~ i N I i :; • • O i zr -~ _ i J DRA~4AGE j' - u.to'- ' • - d A y LIGHT I _ _ _ _ 4 ~ ( ~ . - _. ' - - :i I . - - • i-6 'l BARRIER .~ CURi ( l ~ ~ y~ , / `_ ~ I 1 ti ~ ' I O p '~ S16N i1ND FACE OF eDILDING -' .. ~ I .. -:.. LIGN .LINDAHL QLDS I _ - _ - - SCREE IN FEET 1 0 . ^ - `~ ' SHOWROOM & OFFICES I ~ I j v AREA OF PROPERTY - 27660 S0. FEET I LINDAHL OLDSMOBILE INC. ~- - ., .L ' AREA OF BUILDINGS- 6,930 50. FEET - - "-" - - _ 1900 Wesf 78th St ~ ~ Ii3 ~ ~ ' ~~ ~~,~ "¢ ~" - /~ SIGM BAND fACE Of BUILDING ' ~ - ~ ~ _ _ " . _ J~ CONCRETE. WAER _~ ~ _ _ Minneapolis t MN 55423 - - ~~- -~ -t.t. I cAR DISPLAY SS'- AREA 1 E -- ~~ .. _. -~..r. ___._ _ . .. __ _____._ _, SIGN - (6) RED DOGWOOD 8 PLANTS veovERTr uNEf (21 EMPERIAL HONEY LOCUST TREES - 10 U. S. HWY. "494 . WERE- 98 SO. FEET , IrALU HAPPINESS MiCART IS LINDAHL GUARANTEED _.i OLDS I ~' BRICK 6 PLYWOOD a' I I ~' J ~o~ , toragc,•~loading, unlardi.ng or- similar activities,. 3.33, u ~r ::~CU7 ~TIOi~?.~ >~©P, '~C-2~GlT1rRA3 _ ~ - • .. COli-iT;l.CI1;.., DI~TP<T~T. Subdiv;.soon 1. Pcrnuttcd It.c~. Tn a Gcncral Commercial district unle;;s •~• 2rovicled in this cha,~rer, t-1c ollo~ring uses are permitted; ' otheLZai.,e (1) Any••use permitted in •an ";" district or an "~iR" district upon compliance with the procedural requirements for such district provided that no one-family, t*~o-family or multiple-family d~~elling shall be conctrucL-ed in this district without first obtaininga special use ;permit L-herefor in accorrdance s~ith provisions of Beefier 3,41. -(2) Any cemmerci~l u;,e permitted in a "C-1" district, subject to the procedural re._uiraments containWd in this section. •~ {3) P.etail stores and shops, includir_~ soda fountains. (<<) Fir!ancial institutions, telephone and telegraph offices, messenger offices and professi-oval offices. (S) Carpenter, furnitu~~ rerairing and upholst~~y shops, book binding shops, dress matting shops, show rerairing o-r dyeing shoes, ne~-rs;~aper and job printing establishments, electrical, tinsmithinv, plumbing, decorating shops, self service laund:: ies and outdoo~° adverti sir. sign. (u) Tree trimming sYrvices provided that such services do not include storage accumulation or l:aepi~zo of ~:good or trey trimmings on the premises. (7) 1`-ecessory uso~ and structures incidental to any permitted use, but not £ncluding the open scoraga of ectuipment or materials. Subd. ?_. Uses by Special Use Permit. The follociinb uses shall be permitted only upon tha procurement o{ <; spacial use permit pursuant to Section 3.41; (1) Undert<:Icing esiablishmen~s, ., (2) l:ny drive-in business there people a-re served in automobiles. (~) ~:utomobile cam;~s Gnd courts, (4) Hotels, motels, restaurants, cafes gasoline ~ C b ervice station,,, service Station stores, public gara~~s, car•sales lots, and theaters. A'o service station may be converted into a station store c~ithaut a special use permit for such use issued in accordance ~:i th Section 3,41 of this coda. (1'73-2I). 2-12-7C,. .- (5) Other business uses~~~hich are determined by the Council to be of the s~m~ general character as th? U3eS enumerated in this section -and c•~hich t~~ill not ~be obnoxious or detrimental to the area in which they Mould be located. ~1 Subd. 3. P.ehulations P.alatintr to Gasoline Service Stations ~ <- ., --- Public Gara,,e~ Gnd Car Sales Lots. li special use permit for a gasoline service station, public garage or a.ear sales lot shall not be granted unless fine council finds that the Eropased use S-till be in substantial compliance i~Jith the. follo~~irg standards; ~{a)• ,The use site ~-gill not- abut a lot G~hich is ira an "P." district-. For the purposes of this paragraph, a lot which merely adjoins the use site at one corner ~•~i11 not be deemed to abut the site. (b) The use c~~ill not create undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion by reason of the L-urning mavemen%s c•~hich vehicles t•rould make in entering or leaving the site. •• (c) 1`lo drivec•Tay, at the point it crosses the property line of the site cuill be taithin 40 feel- of an intersection. [1n "intersection" as used in this paragraph me<zns the point of intersection of flit extended curb. lines if the curbs on the near 'side of the site, and measurement shall be along such extended curb lines. '~ 2-11-74 ~.. ~~ (d) The station or garage will not display any banners, noisy ribbons 'or similar attention-distracting or visibility-ob;,euring devices in-the Brea in front of building setbactc lines. • (e} The 'minimum frontage on any street will, be 120 feet and the minimum area•of the site will be 12,000 square feet for a station with lour •pumps or less; and stations with more pumps t•~ill have sufficient additional . frontage area to provide equi.valenL- and sufficient- space for servicing vehicles, for off`street parking, for safe vehicular approaches into the station, and for good visibility for pedestrians and drivers. (f) No driveway twill be flared outward on the boulevard in such a way as to encroach upon the boulevard of adjacent property. (g) The station or garage will comply with the off-street parking, sign construction and other regulations of the .city. (h) Any required bu.f.fer or screening area will be so constructed as to obstruct headlight beams of automobiles on the station properly from beaming onto adjacent residential property. (i) Pump islands will not be so close to street or adjacent property lines as to create the likelihood of encroachment by vehicles upon street night-of-t•~ay, sidewalk areas or adjacent property. (j) Only one permanent detached ground display sign, pddestal type may be erected on the street frontage at or. near the property ~in~ adjacent ' , to the street, e~:cept that if the frontage oii the. •si;rceL . is in .excess ~af .150 feet, tero such signs may be alloc•7ed by the council on such frontage, subject to any other applicable sign regulation. (1~~. All exterior lighting caill be so designed, placed and operated as not to be a nuisance .o adjacent properties. .(1) If the station or garage is to be located in a shopping center or other integrated developr:ent, it *.•~ill be in architectural harmony with the rest of the center or developc~ent. (m) The station or garage t•~i_11 not provide for the outdoor operation of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor display of merchandise; but the outside underground storage of gasoline and other petroleum products betcaeen pumps, or the temporary display of -. merchandise within 4 feet of the station building is permitted. • (n) If the station or garage is not to be located on a county road or .state high-~ay, i_t shall not be operated beL-c•~een the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a,m. of the following day. • {oa If the site is at an intersection, provision will be made far an unobstructed area on the site, adjacent to and within 50 feet of the int-er- seetion, free of vehicles, signs {other than a pedestal sign), displays or other materials which tend to obstruct intersection visibility. Subd. 4. Regulation:; Re'at_ng to Hotels, riotels, Restaurants and Cafes. A special use.permi_t shall not be granted for a hotel,. motel, restaurant or cafe unless the council finds that the proposed use will be in substantial compliance faith the following standards: (a) The use twill not create undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion either on the public streets adjacent to the site or on the parking areas on or adjacent to-the site or on streets adjacent to the site unL-o which traffic to or fro~~ the site is channeled. (b) Adequato provision will be made; throuUh the use of building set- baclcs, buffer areas, screening, and exterior treatment or placement of the building on the site to .avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust, and any other sources of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent properties. ~ 3/23170 ~N~e~LY -. -v cu..,_ .L - ~`~~ ~ ~ ~~„~ 1900 WEST 78th STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, M/NNESOTA 55423 -Phone 866.8461 ~q} 1- ~•' ~~~,~.~, ~~~rcut October 25, 1977 1~r. Rich~.rd C. Krier Planning a_nd Redeveloprnent Director City of Richfield Richf~.eld, N~.nnesota 55+23 Re: Special. Use Permit 1918-2~ 1~iest 78th Street Dear 2.4r. Krier: ~n application is pending fox a special use permit for the above described property, l:n connection ~ritli said special use pe~~nit :~: have revie~~aed. t~~e City of Richfield regulations pertaining to ParY,ina Areas-Special Regulations, Chapter x+.05 (8); Special Use Permit Criteria set forth in Chapter 3.33 (3}; and the Landscapa.ng Standards and Criteria on areas not used for parY,ing. This is to advise that T have read and understaTld the reg~2lations and agree to abide by them in the event the special. use per~ai.t is granted. Vez°y truly yours, I:~IIdDAHL OLD~~:OBIT~, SI v`. Jay - ~ ~~.--i ~r_ ~~T. J~. PicCartl~y president _~ 'G, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 40 Agenda February 13, 197 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Coun City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Purchases in Excess of $1, 000 Chapter VI, Section 6.05 of the City Charter stipulates that the city council must approve purchases of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1, 000. There are two such items on the city council agenda of February 13, 1978. Vehicles For a number of years,. the city has participated in the Hennepin County joint purchasing program. One of the major items Richfield purchases through this program each year is vehicles for our governmental fleet. Hennepin County has now received bids for vehicles. to be used in 17 municipalities with Richfield's 1978 needs included in that bid. The 1978 central garage budget provides for the purchase of two 3/4 ton pickup trucks, which will be replacements for fully de- preciated vehicles in the central garage revolving fund. These two pickup trucks to be purchased in 1978 will replace trucks currently used by the park and recreation department, which have accumulated substantial mileage and wear in city use. Both of the vehicles being replaced will• be sold at a Hennepin County auction this spring, to obtain a maximum investment return per vehicle. It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of two 3/4 ton pickup trucks, to be used by the park and recreation department, in the amount of $14,157.40. ~, .w Council Letter No. 40 -2- February 13, 1978 Papercutter The 1978 budget for the central services division includes funds for purchase of a power papercutter. This piece of equipment will replace a broken, hand-oper- ated papercutter and is particularly necessary now that we have begun printing the quarterly newsletter and utility insert ourselves. Two quotations have been received for this power papercutter, from T.K. Gray, Inc. in the amount of $3, 272, and from Perfection Type, Inc. , in the amount of $3,445.00. Both quotations include atrade-in credit on the old papercutter. It is recommended that the city council approve this purchase in excess of $1, 000 for acquisition of a power papercutter from T.K. Gray, Inc. in the amount of $3, 272.00. Respectfully sub fitted, ~. Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Finance Director Public Safety Director ~: .;~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 39 Agenda February 13, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to issuance of Special Use Permits At the January 9, 1978 city council meeting, the city council gave first reading approval to an amendment to Chapter TII, Part IV, of the city code. The purpose of this amendment is to insure that private development within an officially approved redevelopment area, such as the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet area, must comply with all officially adopted city and redevelopment area plans, regulations and guidelines for the redevelopment district before being granted a special use permit. This requirement will insure that private development efforts within an officially approved redevelopment area are carried out in a manner consistent with the city's overall developmental goals for that redevelopment area. The council referred the proposed ordinance amendment to the Planning Commission for their review prior to second reading consideration of the amendment. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment at their January meeting and recommended that the city council adopt the ordin- ance. The Planning Commission also recommended that the city council con- sider expanding the intent of the. proposed ordinance to strengthen the re- quirement that developments throughout the city conform with the comprehen- sive development plan. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is recomm- ended that the city council give second reading consideration to this ordin- ance amendment at the February 13, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~. Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager cc: Planning & Redevelopment Director ... AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III, PART IV OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF .THE CITY OF RICHFIELD City of Richfield does ordain: Chapter TII, Part IV of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, relating to zoning, is hereby amended in the following respect: A new Subdivision 5P; is added to Section 3.41 providing as follows: "Subd 5A Conditions Governing Issuance of a Special Use Permit in an Officially Approved Redevelopment Area. The council shall not grant a permit for any uses enumer- ated in Subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use which the permit is sought is in compliance with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan, with any officially adopted redevelop- ment plans and urban design guidelines thereof, and with the city's parking regulations and landscape guidelines." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1978. Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk r ~. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 38 Agenda February 13, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Zoning District Change, 7344 Cedar Avenue Second Reading At the January 23, 1978 city council meeting, the council gave-first reading approval to a zoning ordinance amendment which would change the zoning for property located at 7344 Cedar Avenue from residential (R) and multi-residential (MR) to neighborhood business (C-1). This rezoning was requested to allow conversion of an existing single family residence at that location into offices for a real estate company, construction company and service station. The rezoning request was filed by Mr. Robert A. Williams of Geraldine Investments. A public hearing on the requested change in zoning district is scheduled for the February 13, 1978 city council meeting. After that public hearing, it is recommended that the city council give second reading approval to the proposed ordinance amendment, thereby approving the zoning district change for 7344 Cedar Avenue from single family residential (R) and multi-family residential (MR) to neighborhood business (C-1). A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. Respectfully submitted, S.~ ~~~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director City Attorney i i AMENDi~ENT TO .APPENDIX C OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF TI-IE CI`.CY OF RICHFIELD, AuNrTESOTA CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Appendix C of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota defining the boundaries of tine various zoning districts of the City enumerated in Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.28, Subdivision ?_ of such code is hereby amended in the following respects: 1. Appendil~ C, Section 4 is amended by amending Paragraph {90) thereof to read as follows: " {g8) The north [545.1%] 465 feet of Outl.ot 1 of Evergreen Gardens ?_nd Addition." 2. Apper~div C, Section 2 is amt~nded by adding after Paragraph (20) the following ne~,a paragraph: " (?.1) • Outlot_ 1, of Evergreen Gardens 2n.d A~Ldi_tion r-„ exccr~t for the T~~i-th 46 5 feet tl~e~_eor_ Passed by the City Council of the City of_ 12ichfi_e_lc3_, I,Zinnesota this _ clap of _._________~_...~__~y 1978. Loren .Law, P~iayor ATTES'T' Tom Moran, City Cler ~, i. a :.• s J :,.,~ JAi~ 11 19~~ d CITY.OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council .City.. of Richfield Gentlemen: 7 Council Letter No. 37 .Agenda February 13, 1978 Subject: Comprehensive Planning Assistance Grant Agreement Af the September 26, 1977 meeting of the city council, the city council approved the proposed work program for amending the city's comprehensive plan (as required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act), and authorized the staff to submit an application to the- Metropolitan Council fora Planning Assistance Grant to assist in implementing. this work program. On December 8, 1977, the Metropolitan Council approved a grant in the amount of $6, 089. to assist Richfield in carrying out its comprehensive plan amendment work program. Attached is a copy of the grant agreement which the city must execute in order to receive the Planning Assistance Grant funds. Tt is recommended that the city council authorize. the city manager to execute this agreement with the Metropolitan Council. Respectfully submit ed, ~~II,,~Q ~ r GU~VY~' Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director ._ ~ r Contract No . 7 f~~ GRANT AGREEMENT - BETt^TEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCSL AND CITY OF RICHFIELD THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 197 by and between the Metropolitan Council, hereinafter referred to as the "Council," and the City of Richfield , hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee." WHEREAS, the Council is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section`473.851, et seq., to administer the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, hereinafter referred to as the "Act," which requires local governmental units within the Metropolitan Area to prepare comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature by Laws 1976, Chapter 167, has made available and required the Council to administer a fund to be utilized to assist local governments in the carryinG out of .required planning in the form of Planning Assistance Grants; and WHEREAS the Council desires to assist the Grantee in carrying out required comprehensive planning in accordance with the Act. NOW THEREFORE, the Council and Grantee agree as follows: 1. A. The Council shall pay ~to the Grantee, in accor- dance with the schedule set forth below, a total grant amount of $ 6,089.00 Grant funds shall be made available to the Grantee as follows: $ 5,480.00 , immediately upon execution of this agreement. $ 609.00 , upon satisfactory evaluation by the Council of the Funded Portion Completion P.eport submitted by the Grantee pursuant to Paragraph 4B of this agreement. B. The Grantee agrees that no more than 750 of the total cost of carrying out the work prograa-n set forth in Grantee's application for grant assistance, Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be financed by grant funds. C. The Grantee shall utilize the grant funds to carr~• out the activities specified in the funded portior_ of the work program set forth in Appendix B,-attached hereto and made a part hereof. D. The Grantee agrees to comply with all provisions of the 2~4etropolitan Council Application Award and Disbursement Guidelines for the Administration of Planning Assistance Grants, hereinafter referred to as the "Guidelines," dated April, 1977, ~~hich is hereby incorpcrated by reference into this agreement and made a part hereof. -2- 2. Authorized use of grant proceeds. It is understood and agreed that the following costs and expenses shall be the only .such costs and expenses paid for out of grant proceeds. Costs and expenses to be reimbursed, shall additionally be in substantial accord with specifications contained in the grantee's grant application and other provisions contained herein, but in no event shall the Council reimburse the Grantee for costs and expenses incurred in excess of the total grant amount. The following costs specifically incurred in carrying out the planning activities required by the Act and specified in the funded portion of the work program shall be payable from grant proceeds: A. Compensation of existing staff. B. Compensation of newly hired staff. C. Employment of a qualified consultant(s). D. Payment of other costs such as overhead, rental of space and equipment, purchase of supplies, printing and publishing. E. Payment of costs incurred in eligibly`inventory activities undertaken since the date of passage of the Act. 3: Accounting. A. The grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of any and all grant funds including, but not limited to documentation and information relating to the selection and payment of consultants. B. The above accounts and records of the grantee shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the grantee are audited, and may be audited and/or inspected on grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the Council at any time following reasonable notification during the grant period and for a period of three years following final grant payment. 4. Reports. A. Midpoint Report. Grantee shall prepare and deliver a midpoint report by letter notifying the Council that the activities undertaken in connection with grant assistance are half completed. The report shall contain a short description of the utilization of grar_t funds, remaining funds in the grant account and projected future planning expenses, and expected completion dates. -3- B. Funded Portion Completion Report. Upon completion of the funded portion of the work program, the Grantee shall submit to the Council a funded portion completion report. The Council shall evaluate the report to determine that performance was satisfactory, in that the major tasks to be funded by the grant proceeds were completed. The report shall be of sufficient content and detail to enable the Council to adequately make said evaluation. C. Final Progress Report. The Grantee agrees that upon completion of the total work program, the Grantee will submit to the Council a final progress report which shall be evaluated by the Council to determine that: 1) the planning costs funded by this grant did not exceed 75~ of the total cost of the work program; 2) the scope of work was completed; 3) The terms of this agreement were met. 5. General Conditions. A. Duration. The period of grant award specified .• herein shall commence on the execution of this agreement and remain in force and effect until July 1, 1980. At that date, all allocated grant funds which have not been expended or otherwise com- mited by contract, or are not reasonably expected to be paid out in connection with expenses incurred before that date, shall revert to and become a part of the Council's local government assistance fund, and may be reallocated or expended by the Council for planning assistance to other local governmental units in accordance with the Guidelines. B. Rights Reserved. In the event that the Council finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the Council reserves the right to take any and all such action as it deems necessary or appropriate to protect the Council's interest. C. Changes. The terms of this agreement may be changed or modified by mutual agreement by the parties hereto. Such changes cr modifications shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and Grantee. D, T:~e Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to non-discrimination, affirmative action, and public purchase, contracting, and~loy:^ =*'.t• -4- In particular., Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and to take affirmative action that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, lay-off, termination, rates of pay,- and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written by their authorized representatives. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By John Boland, Chairman GRANTEE By APPROVED AS TO LEGAL Title: FORM AND ADEQUACY: Office of Staff Counsel ~: ~'~'~ y METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 3Ofl Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 5510! f.'a ~• ~ "N'~~ COMMUNITY GRANT APPLLCATION ''`••~~"' - APPENDIX A 1. Name of Community Richfield Minnesota 2. Name of Loral Contact Parson Richard C' Kri r Telephone Number ~ 612) 8 6 9- 7 5 21 X 2 5 9 3. Work Program Outline the major tasks and the total costs of those tasks which must be undertaken in order to prepare or update the community's comprehensive plan according to its systems statement, and prepare and adopt its Official Controls. The outline should follow the format shown on the back of this application form. Please refer to the attached prospectus. ~~ ~. J. 'l ~_- ' _~_.~ f' i ~ _rr~ 4. Completion Date _ _ _ Estimated completion date of the Work Program July , 19 8 0 . ____ 5. Previous Planning Indicate whether this work program refieas the cost of updating a previously prepared plan and, if so, describe to what extent the plan(s) will be utilized in developing the communiry's Comprehensive Plan. This prospectus is designed to update a previously prepared Comprehensive Plan. Please refer to the prospectus. 6. Outside Assistance List amounts and sources of outside assistance. None 7. Special Fund Requests !f the community wishes to apply for a portion of the Special Fund: (11 describe the existing or proposed metropolitan feature or activity that exists within or near your community that increases the total cost to the community of preparing or updatina its comprehensive plan relative to other communities; (21 document as best as possible how the feature or activity relates to the funding criteria (V C 3 of the Guidelines] and how it increases your rnst; and (3) state the amount requested and indipte where this amount is reflected in the work program major task cost estimates. 8. Grant Amount(s) Requested: a. Community Comprehensive Planning Fund entitlement 3 6 0 9 9. 0 0 b. Inventory Activity Fund entitlement S 0 c. Special Planning Problems Funds requested S ~ TOTAL' S 6, 0 8 9. 0 0 ' •Totarl Cana amount requested, plus zssstance from the counties out of the County Assis•ance to Freestanding Growth Centers Fund .;r Inventory Activities Fund, may not exceed 75% of the total cost of the wor:< program, or the total cost to community. .~ . CITY OF RICHFIELD APPENDIX A (continued) ~} Work Program Total Cost of Performed Major Tasks: Major Task: - 7 by: 2 - 1. Land Use Ptan Comprehensive A. Inventory3 $ 5 4 7 2. 0 0 Planner B. Development of Policies and Plans: Comprehensive t. Land use 25 536.00 ~a ner 2. Protection 5 4 7 2. 0 0 Com Planner 3. Housing 4 P 4. Airport-related considerations 13 6 8 0. 0 0 CO?I1D Planner !{. Facilities Plan A. Inventory3 5 4 7 2 . P~ B. Development of Policies and Plans: ~ - ~. Transportation 11, 424.00 Planning Director 2. Sewer Policy 11 4 2 4. 0 0 1a ina e r 3. Parks and Opert Space 444 nr± Pl r I11. implementation Program - A, .Inventory3 5 472.00 Plannin Director B, Development of Programs or Descriptions: ~. Official Controls 5 472.00 Plannin Director Z. Capitallmprovement l O 944.00 CO]?iD Planner 3. Housing Implementation >a ~ P 1 n i i r? r IV. Preparation and Adoption of City Manager 8 Official Controls 5,472.00 City Council Tote! Cost of Work Program• 136,848.00 Outside Assistance (-) -0- Cost to Community 136,848.00 ~ Includes all costa defined as included in the total cast of the work progran, ZLead person{s), Firm(s) or agency(s) responsible for the performance of the major tasks of the work program. If indefinite at present, provide your best estimation and indicate that it is tentative. 3For communities that are eligible for Inventory AC,ivity Grant entitlements, specify It) the eligible activities to be undertaken, and {2) the cost to the community. . CITE' OF RICHFIELD APPENU1x F~ ~c~~nLinuc:at .~` 'r 1 Includes all costs defined as included in the total cost of tte work prooram. 2Lead p^rson(,), Firm(s) or ~gency(s} responsible fcr the performane~ of the major t~~sks of the vaork precram. if indefinite at present, provie'e your best estimation and indicate t;~at it is tentative. 3Fcr ccr,vnuniti;a that ~,rc e~i;ible for Im•er.;ory rl~tivity Crant entitlements, specify (1) the eligible activities to he undertaken, and 4'') t.._ cost to the community. ~~I:n~:l.ucto.~ only rncfr.~ial~orV ac-ci.vi't~ics. " •• CITY Off' RICHFIELD ,, . APPE~IDTX B FUNDED PORTION OF THE ~•IORY.' PROGRAM List-below the work program major task(s) which will be funded by the total grant award of $6,089.00 If only a portion of ~a major task is. to be funded, list the specific activity(ies) and cost (s) . P~Iajor Task s) or Activities to be Funded ~ Cost I. Land Use Plan: A. Inventory. ~ ~ $ 2,000.00 B. 1. Land Use 1,100.00 B. 3. Housing 1,000.00 B. 4. Airport-related considerations 1,000.00 II. Facilities Plan: A. Inventory 1,000.00 Total Cost of Funded $ 6,100.00 Tasks or Activities Less Outside Assistance (--) -0- . Applicable to the Above F,e:~aining Cost $ of Funded T~~.s1s ~ar~d Activities 6,100.00 *P~1L":St bE' c?GL:cll t~~ Or C~*J:•~°-cater than ti~ total CiYci;:t award. Estimated cornple~ci or_ d~=_te of the above major tas~:s and activities Janua~, 1979 - e ~~ may, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 36 Agenda February 13 , 19 7 8 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Conveyance of Highway Residue Land to Hennepin County The purpose of this council letter is to inform the city council of the possible conveyance of residue highway land to Hennepin County and to request city council direction in this matter. In 1960-61, Hennepin County acquired property for the Crosstown Highway construction pr-oject. This acquisition included three parcels in Richfield which were acquired for a total of $71, 000. These parcels are located at: 6204 Morgan Avenue South 6209 12th Avenue South 6204 Vincent Avenue South In each instance part of the land was used for highway right-of-way purposes with the remainder being conveyed to the City of Richfield primarily for utility purposes in the early 1960's. A full description of each parcel is attached. Hennepin County has been pursuing a policy of selling unneeded land adjacent to county right-of-way. As part of this effort, bids were taken on the three parcels of land listed above. It was not until bids were actually received that it was dis- covered that title was held by the City of Richfield rather than Hennepin County. Hennepin County has inquired as to whether the City of Richfield would be willing to deed this land back to Hennepin County so that the county could proceed with the sale of these three parcels. This matter has been reviewed by the city staff and it has been determined that except for the need to retain utility easements, there is no requirement for the city to continue holding title to this property. Each lot contains approximately .16 acres of land and would not meet current standards for buildable lots. without ob- taining necessary variances from the City of Richfield. Moreover, each parcel is Council Letter No. 36 -2- February 13, 1978 r . adjacent to the crosstown which has been argued by other adjacent property owners to be the source of undesirable noise levels which are inconsistent with residential property uses. The three parcels were conveyed to the city for one dollar. The total amount of the bids received by Hennepin County for purchase of these three parcels total $10, 015. Hennepin County did individually contact all adjacent property owners to advise them of the sale so that adjacent property owners did have the opportunity to submit bids. It is the opinion of the city staff that it would make sense for the land to be sold and returned to the property tax rolls. It would also be logical that the selling agency he Hennepin County inasmuch as it was the county who had to acquire the land initially. If the city council concurs with this opinion, the matter should be referred to the planning commission for a recommendation. Upon receiving a recommendation from the planning commission, it would be possible for the city council to give consideration to a transitory ordinance transferring this-.land subject to utility easements to Hennepin County so that the pending sales can be consumated. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Wayne S . Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Park and Recreation Director Planning and Redevelopment_Director Public Works Director ," ATTACfIMENT "A" COUNTY ROUTE 62 RESIDUAL LANDS 620+ Morgan Avenue South, Parcel No. 58, Lot 2, Block 2, Melbar Size: 6800 Sq. Ft. (Trapazoid) 21.33 ft. frontage on Newton Avenue So. 271.32 ft. frontage with Route. 62 59.8 ft. frontage on Morgan Avenue S. County purchased land in 1960 for $23,312.3+. Bid received Sept. 8, 1977, for $3,606.00. 6209 12th Avenue South, Parcel 31, part of Lot 2, Block 1, Donnay First Addition Size: 6$00 Sq. Ft. (Trapazoid) 3+.03 ft. frontage on 12th Avenue 138.26 ft. frontage with Route 62 71.22 ft. rear lot measurement County purchase price (1961) was $21,500.00. Bid price received Sept. 8, 1977, for $2,$01.00 620+ Vincent Avenue South; Parcel 1~+, part of Lot 2, Block 3, Lein's Richfield 1st Adds: Size: 6800 Sq. Ft. (Trapazoid) 62.26 ft. frontage on Vincent Avenue South 135.83 ft. frontage on Crosstown x+3.0 ft. rear lot measurement County purchase price (1961) was $26,250.00 Bid price (Sept. 8, 1977), for $2,801.00 1/17/78 .~ N CO. RD. No. 62 (Crosstown Hwy.) s~a~e: i„_ ~, d Service Roa w Q Z m S cn i.,.i Q w U Z 6204 VINCENT AVE. S. PARCEL 14 N Scale .. . CO. RD. No. 62 __~~ (Crosstown Hwy.) tai a ~i Q t +-- N r M 6209 12th AVE. S. PARCEL 31 N ScalE Iti Q z 0 w z CO. RD. No. 62 (Cross#own Hwy.) LtJ Q Q (~ D: 0 6204 MORGAN AVE. S. PARCEL 58 service Road CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 35 y Agenda February 13, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council .,.City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Transitory Ordinance Providing for Expenditure of Money From the Special Revenue Fund for Park Acquisition and Betterment, Second Reading At the January 9, 1978 city council meeting, the city council gave first reading consideration to a transitory ordinance appropriating special revenue monies for several park and recreation projects scheduled for implementation in 1978. .The. 1978 Capital Improvement budget includes the following projects to be funded through the spe cia 1 revenue fund Christian Park $140 , 000 Golf Course 225,000 Park Land Acquisition 20,000 Total 1978 Special Revenue Funding for Park Purposes $385, 000 A copy of the transitory ordinance appropriating special revenue funds for these park acquisition and betterment projects is attached. It is recommended that the city council give second reading to this transitory ordinance at the February 13, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, // Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: Finance Director Park and Recreation Director A BILL 1978-3 TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 16.45 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR PARK ACQUISITION AND BETTERMENT The City of Richfield does ordain: Section I - It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the city to expend money from the special revenue fund for. the acquisition and betterment of public parks and playgrounds, such improvements being capital improvements for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds Section 2._. The sum of $385,000 is hereby authorized to be paid from the special revenue fund for such purposes. Section 3. The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council resolution . Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this January, • 1978 .. Loren L Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas j. Moran City Clerk .,~-' rr CITY OF RICHFIELD, .MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 34 Agenda February 13, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Commission Appointments Vacancies presently exist or will occur soon on several city advisory commissions. These commission vacancies are as follows: Planning Commission One vacancy presently exists. Applications for appointment to this comm- ission have been received from Richard Blevins, Caren. Canfield, John Degnan, est Lindstrom David Lutes, Frank Flett, John Manthey, John Taft and Charles Spain . Oi.~D Park and Recreation Commission There are presentlythree adult terms on this commission which are vacant. Applications for appointment to this commission have om Juanita Collins, Edith Donovan, David Dunham,. john E1 ' Richard Hol n Spain, Thomas St. Aubin, Joanne Wilmes and ew Wor man. ~Q,Q Senior Citizen/Handicapped Commission ~,~ , O ca fists on this commission. An application has been received fro Muriel Grundiz this commission. ~~' Advisory Board of Health Two vacancies exist on this commission. Positions on the board must be filled by either health providers or consumers. No applications have been re- ceived for this board . ~~• w~• -~,. ~+"' ^ Council Letter No. 34 -2- February 13, 1978 Human Rights Commissio _____ One adult term and ne youth term re presently vacant on the Human Rights Commission. Three applica i ns ave been received for appointment to the adult term. They are Philip Magnuson, iane Olson and William Stixrud. No applications have been received for the youth ter ~~. MASAC There is presently a vacancy fora •ernate rep sentative to MASAC. An application has been received fro obert Canfie-1ld. Civic Marker Committee In late summer, 1977, the city council appointed Dr. Felton Jenkins as Chairman of the L/H/N Civic Marker Committee. The purpose of this committee is to raise funds for the civic marker to be located at the intersection of Lyndale Avenue -and 66th Street. .This committee is made up of volunteers from various Richfield service organizations and has already had several meetings and began raising funds. Due to other personal commitments, Dr. Jenkins has, both he and I would like to request that the council appoint a co-chairman for the fund raising committee to assist Dr. Jenkins. I would like to recommend that the council. consider appointing Ms. Gertrude Ulrich as a co-chairman to this committee. Ms. Ulrich served as an officer on the Richfield Bi-Centennial Committee, which commissioned the civic marker project and was responsible for implementing the design phase of the project. Ms. Ulrich's previous participation in the project and her experience in fund raising would be valuable as a co-chairman of the Civic Marker Fund-raising Committee. Respectfully submitted, ~, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja *. ~~a NAMES OF INCUMBENTS AND TERMS OF OFFICE CITY COUNCIL AND PERMANENT COMMISSIONS CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA February, 197$ FIRST TERM OF TERM UNIT- ELECTED OFFICE EXPIRES Note: Figure after each name indicates number of terms including present term. -CITY COUNCIL . A. P. Anderson (7) 11-57 3 years Dec. 31, 1978 .6620 Logan. Avenue E. E. Jacobsen {6) 11-61 3 years Dec. 31, .1979 7515 Wentworth Avenue Loren L. Law, Mayor (4) 11-71 2 years. Dec. 31, 1979 6414 11th Avenue Ivan Ludeman {2) I1-74 3 years Dec. 31, 1980 6338 11th Avenue Vern Luettinger (6) - $-,63 3 years Dec. 31, 1980 "045 14th Avenue FIRST TERM OF TERM PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTED OFFICE EXPIRES Mark Ahlquist (1) ~ 1-76 3 years jan. 12, 1979 7100 Oak Grove Blvd. Joseph Ertman (2) 1-75 3 years Jan. 12, 1979 7533 3rd Avenue _ _ Robert- Lien (2) 1-73 3 years Jan. 12, .19.79 7011 15th Avenue Herbert Ketchum, jr. {2) 2-75 3 years Jan. 11, 1980 7212 Oak Grove Blvd. France Anderson (3) 2-71 3years jan. 11, 1980 7545 Park Avenue Joan Helmberger (3) 2-71 3 years jan. 11, 1980 6914 Park Avenue -2- PLANNING FIRST TERM OF TERM ~ Y~ COMMISSION (Continued) APPOINTED OFFICE - EXPIRES Steven. Lindgren (2) ~.-75 3 years jan. 13, 1981 7132 12th Avenue Gertrude Ulrich (3) 11-73 3 years jan. 13, 1981 7601 Aldrich Avenue ~ :;~ . Vacant 3 years jan. 13, 1981 ` -~- L HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Gen Bolger (3) 5-69 3 years _ May 17, 1978 6638 Morgan Avenue Vacant 3 years May. 17, 1978 Mary Jane Samples (2) 5-72 3 years- Ma.y 17, -1978 7001 Sheridan Avenue . Belen Andrada (2) 8-74 3 years May 27, 1979 7301 Upton Avenue Vacant 3 years May 27, 1979 Jo Ann Bloomberg (2) 7-73 3 years May 27, 1979 6908 Oliver Avenu~- Kalph Olson (3) 7-73 3 years. __ - May 27, 1980 7545 Pillsbury Avenue V. Bob Norberg (1) 5-77 3 years .May 27, 1980 6329 Russell Avenue Brenda Olsen (2) 3-77 3 years May 27, 198.0. 7620 .Park Avenue ` Rev. john McMillan (1) 8-76 3 years May 27, -1980 7000 Oliver Avenue .PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMM[SSION George Evans (2) IO-74 3 years Feb. 1, 1979 6921 Columbus Avenue -3- ~'' . PARK AND RECREATION :FIRST TERM OF TERM ADVISORY COMMISSION (Continued) APPOINTED OFFICE EXPIRES Stan Christianson (2) 8-73 3 years Feb. 1,' 1979 6644 Logan Avenue Emily Day (2) 2-74 3 years Feb. 1, 1979 7340 Clinton Avenue Bernard. Mittelsteadt (1) 1-77 3 years Feb. 1, 1980 6996 Lakeshore Drive .Robert Gunderson (1) 1-77 3 years Feb. 1, 1980 6514 Sheridan Avenue Don Anderson (3) 8-73 3 years Feb. ; 1, 1980 6724 Wentworth Avenue Wayne Donaho {l) 1-78 3 years Feb. 1, 1981 6939 Blaisdell Scott Swanson (1) 1-78 3 years ~ Feb. 1, 1981 6739 13th Avenue Vacant 3 years Feb. 1, 1981 Vacant 3 years Feb. 1, 1981 Vacant 3 years Feb. 1, 1981 SENIOR. CITIZENS ~ -- - ADVISORY COMMISSION Lois Bendickson (1) 1-76 3 years Feb. 1, 1979 72.17 Chicago Avenue Mildred Stake {2) 5-75 3 years Feb. 1, 197-9 7020 Park Avenue Dr. Felton Jenkins (2) 11-73 3 years Feb. 1, 1979 6221 Morgan Avenue Alvin Olson (1) 1-77 3 years Feb. 1, 1980 6636 Thomas Avenue _~ ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH lr. W. H. Bittick (2) 102 Medical Arts Bldg. Helen Cummings (1) 6301 Lyndale Avenue Vacant Vacant Kathryn Dahlgren (2) 6917 `Chicago Avenue Robert Lien (2) _ 7011 15th Avenue Mildred Stake (2) 7020 Park Avenue .Mary Jane Stern (2) "525 Newton Avenue Y' > -William Siemers (2) 2904 W. 71st Street v -5- FIRST TERM TERM APPOINTED OF OFFICE EXPIRES 1977 1 year January, 1979 1978 1 year January, 1979 1 year January, 1979 1 year January, 1979 1977 2 year January, 1980 1977. 2 year January, 1980 .197,7 2 year January, 1980 .1977 2 year January, 1980 1977. 2 year January, 1980 .-- .~ ~. ~,~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 33 Agenda February 13, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Amendment to the City Ordinance Relating to Saunas At the January 9, 1978 city council meeting, the city council gave first reading consideration to an amendment to the Richfield sauna licensing ordinance which would require that no business advertise itself as a sauna unless it holds a valid sauna license issued by the City of Richfield. This ordinance amendment will enable the city to require sauna owners who have ceased operating their businesses as saunas to remove the outside signs advertising the sauna business. A copy of this proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is recomm- ended that the city council give second reading approval to this ordinance amend- ment at the February 13, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, ;,~~~ ~~~/" "~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB/eja cc: City Attorney Public Safety Director Bill 1978-2 AMF~NDMENT TO CHAPTER V, PARrI~ II, SECTION 5.25 OF THE ti ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.25 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield regulating and providing for the licensing of sauna establis hments is hereby amended by adding the follo:•aing paragraph to subdivision 2 thereof: "(3) No person shall hold out any establishment as providina sauna or massacLe services un ess establishment is licensed as provided in this section. Whenever any establishment ceases to be licensed as a sauna whether through the suspension, cancellation, revocation, non-renewal or la~nse of its license, its owners sha11 immediately remove from public view any sign or display which identifies the establishment as being a sauna or massage parlor or as offe nir g sauna or massage services." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1977. Loren_L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Tom Moran, City Clerk =' CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 32 l~ Agenda February 13, 197$ The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Year II Community Development Block Grant Program The purpose of this council letter is to request city council approval for a transfer of monies from the Year ?I Community Development Block Grant Program administration budget to the Year II construction budget. In early 1976, the city council authorized the staff to submit an application for Year iI funding through the Community Development Block Grant Program. Included in that application was funding for two park and recreation construction projects, improvements to the community center and improvements at Fremont and Taft Parks. Also included in the Year II grant was funding for administrative matters related to these park development projects. Park development projects included in the Year II Community Development have been completed. In implementing those projects, the city staff determined that the dollars allocated to administrative costs could be better spent on the construction aspects of the park development and, therefore, all Year II Commun- ity Development funding for park improvements was used for meeting construction costs, and none was used for administrative purposes. Hennepin County has recently informed us that, while the allocation of monies between approved projects was previously a staff concern, it is now necessary for the city council to approve any reallocation of administrative dollars used in construction of projects funded through the Community Development Block Grant Program. Tt is recommended that the city council adopt a motion authorizing the reallocation of $250 from the Year II Community Development grant administrative appropriations to CD Project 26 (Community Center II), and reallocation of $650 from the administrative appropriation to CD Project 29 (park development). cc: Finance Director Park and Recreation Director Respectfully submitted, G~%~~ C/~ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager