Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05-08-78 agenda
l� CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 136 agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Appointments to Golf Course Citizen Committee At the April 24, 1978 city council meeting, the city council increased the maximum number of individuals on the Golf Course Citizen Committee from nine to twelve. The city council also made additional appointments for a total of ten appointments to the committee. The city council agreed that the two additional individuals to be appointed to the committee should be non - golfers and businessmen capable of reviewing financial and managerial aspects of a golf course. It would be desirable for these two additional individuals to be appointed at the May 8 city council meeting inasmuch as the committee has already begun it's work. Copies of additional applications received since the last city council meeting are attached for your information. Respectfully su itted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /jkl C" Cr Date 1% %,1) APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINNTMENT NAMEDWEfG%N' /q�/ Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS :Zc /%s it ✓£ Su 1 /l'c4 / -; 5-S VZ- 3 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City �f Zip Code PHONE: Home �Ll�- / 3 Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped. Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: e /4 AA A U/ 6 211 1- "F Id Lt CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: L� Da to APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD T 1AM ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINT "1 19 Ilu NAME PERUSSE WANDA F,I,rhfield +y Manaffl Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 6436 Girard Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. PHONE: Home 869 5341 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission City Zip Code Business 861 7511, ext. 160 Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission Advisory Board of Health Other GOLF COMMISSION /COMMITTEE ( ?) Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: I am a golfer, a member of the Minnesota Women's Golf Association and have served on various committees at our club. I love the game of golf and would consider it a privilege and 'honor to be a part of the planning for this golf course for the city of Richfield. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: I have been a resident of Richfield for- 39 years. When my sons were in school I was active in PTA, Little League and many other community activities. Presently I volunteer at least 5 hours per week working on behalf of a political candidate. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 135 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Selection of Golf Course Building Architect On April 10, 1978, a recommendation was submitted to the city council for selection of a building architect for the golf course project. A copy of council letter number 108 containing that recommendation is attached. At the April 10, 1978, city council meeting the city council voted to defer consideration of this matter to the May 8, 1978 city council meeting and it is being presented again at this time in accordance with that action. The council may wish to act on this matter at the May 8th meeting or con- sider deferring it again to the May 22nd meeting, since it is my understanding that there will be no decision on a site architect until that time. Respectfully submitted, ��Q to wlV` `' ,1; Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /jkl cc: City Attorney Parks & Recreation Director Public Works Director and Members of the City Council City of Richfield x Gentlemen: -Subject: Proposal for Golf Course Building Architect - - -- -- - - k.? On January 23, 1978, the city council authorized the city manager to inter - view golf course architects and submit a recommendation for selection of a qualified firm. The city manager promised to make such a recommendation late 4, in March or early April which would be consistent with the golf course project time schedule. Y {4 Richard Schwarz /Neil Weber, Inc. is the firm proposed to provide architectural services related to buildings and structures for the proposed golf course. This firm is capable of providing a number of services including site analysis and sel- ection, interior planning and design, construction :management and inspection services, energy use analysis, and architecture. The firm has provided significant architectural services for the City of Richfield. at Roosevelt Park; Christian Park, and the Community Center. The firm has been extremely responsive to the needs and concerns of the city as cited by various neighborhood. groups and. committees, the staff, commissions and council. Other recreational projects designed by this firm have included the Moir Park shelter for the City of Bloomington, Sumner Field recreation building for the Minneapolis Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a number of planned unit de- velopment residential developments, and. other projects in the Midwest. The firm has provided architectural services for a new clubhouse for the Alexandria Golf Club. The firm is also providing architectural services for the private Maple Greens golf club in Maplewood, Minnesota. Responses from clients have rem inforced the firm's competence and responsiveness. Because the total program for the proposed club house cannot be finally determined until preliminary use proposals are considered, the staff has approached the various firms under consideration with estimated project expenditures. The staff is presently estimating the cost of a club house to be approximately $250,000. Generally, fees for architectural services provided either on a lump sum basis, on a percentage of actual construction expenditures or on an hourly basis would be in the vicinity of $20,000 for a project of this size. r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ' Office of City Manager ,. Council Letter No. 108 t ` Agenda April 10, 1978 The Honorable Mayor - and Members of the City Council City of Richfield x Gentlemen: -Subject: Proposal for Golf Course Building Architect - - -- -- - - k.? On January 23, 1978, the city council authorized the city manager to inter - view golf course architects and submit a recommendation for selection of a qualified firm. The city manager promised to make such a recommendation late 4, in March or early April which would be consistent with the golf course project time schedule. Y {4 Richard Schwarz /Neil Weber, Inc. is the firm proposed to provide architectural services related to buildings and structures for the proposed golf course. This firm is capable of providing a number of services including site analysis and sel- ection, interior planning and design, construction :management and inspection services, energy use analysis, and architecture. The firm has provided significant architectural services for the City of Richfield. at Roosevelt Park; Christian Park, and the Community Center. The firm has been extremely responsive to the needs and concerns of the city as cited by various neighborhood. groups and. committees, the staff, commissions and council. Other recreational projects designed by this firm have included the Moir Park shelter for the City of Bloomington, Sumner Field recreation building for the Minneapolis Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a number of planned unit de- velopment residential developments, and. other projects in the Midwest. The firm has provided architectural services for a new clubhouse for the Alexandria Golf Club. The firm is also providing architectural services for the private Maple Greens golf club in Maplewood, Minnesota. Responses from clients have rem inforced the firm's competence and responsiveness. Because the total program for the proposed club house cannot be finally determined until preliminary use proposals are considered, the staff has approached the various firms under consideration with estimated project expenditures. The staff is presently estimating the cost of a club house to be approximately $250,000. Generally, fees for architectural services provided either on a lump sum basis, on a percentage of actual construction expenditures or on an hourly basis would be in the vicinity of $20,000 for a project of this size. Council Letter No. 108 -2- April 10, 1978 It is recommended that the city council approve the selection of this firm and authorize the city manager to negotiate an agreement with Richard Schwarz/ Neil Weber, Inc. The agreement would contain at least two parts. The first part would be for the preliminary work required at this time. This phase of the agreement would be on a lump sum basis, estimated to be $3,700. The second part of the agreement would be for subsequent architectural design and other related matiers. The agreement would be presented to the city council for final review, consideration and action at the April 24, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, �Q Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager ark z� F, WSB /eja g� ' cc: Parks and Recreation Director Finance Director City Attorney Respectfully submitted, �Q Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No - 134 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Selection of Golf Course Site Architect On April 10, 1978, a recommendation was submitted to the city council for the selection of a golf course site architect. A copy of council letter number 109 containing that recommendation is attached hereto. On April 10, 1978, the city council decided to meet in special session on April 18 to interview three of the site architect firms which were considered by the city staff. The city council also voted to defer a decision on selection of a site architect to the April 24, 1978 city council meeting. At the April 24, 1978 city council meeting, the city council voted to defer action on the selection of a golf course site architect to the May 8, 1978 city council meeting. The city council also asked the citizen committee to make a further report on the selection of a site architect so that this report can be considered when a decision was made on May 8, 1978. The citizen committee has had one meeting and determined that it would not be possible to submit a report to the city council on the matter of site architect until the end of the week of May 14th. Therefore, the city council may wish to defer action on the selection of a site architect until the May 22nd city council meeting. Respectfully siitted, � ll Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /jkl cc: City Attorney Parks & Recreation Director Public Works Director t �t CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 109 Agenda April 10, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council .� City of Richfield Gentlemen: z -Subject: Proposal for Golf Course Site Architect On January 23, 1978 the city council authorized the city manager to interview golf course architects and to make a recommendation on the selection +, of a qualified architect. The city manager indicated that such a recommendation would be made late in March or early in April which would be consistent with the golf course project schedule. The firm proposed for golf course site architect is Brauer & Associates. This firm has been involved in the design of a large number of golf courses and has the capability of providing a very high level of service to the City of Richfield. on this project. Brauer & Associates is a multi- disciplinary firm with previous experience in working for private clients as well as all levels of gov- ernment. Brauer & Associates has previously worked for the City of Richfield in providing design and construction management services for the Wood Lake Nature Center and park projects within the city. A list of golf courses designed. by Brauer & Associates in recent years is attached. The following four projects :ire the_ most recent courses for which this firm has provided services: I. Pokegama Golf Course at Grand Rapids, MN. This is an 18 hole golf course to be opened for the first time in 1978. 2. Brook Time Golf Course in Owatonna, MN. This involves the addition of nine new holes to an existing nine hole course. This project will be open as an 18 hole course for the first time in 1978. 3. A municipal golf course at Moorhead, MN. This is a new nine hole course currently under construction. 4. Floyd Park Golf Course in Sioux City, Iowa. This project is currently under construction and involves major renovation and Council Letter No. 109 -2- rehabilitation of an existin g 18 hole golf course. April 10, 1978 Staff investigation of previous golf course clients indicates that Brauer & Associates has enjoyed a good working relationship with these clients; has provided a high level of design services; is thorough in analysis of unique � NO A design situations and accurate in cost projections. It is recommended that the city council approve the selection of Brauer & Associates for golf course site planning services and authorize the city manager to prepare a complete agreement with Brauer & Associates to cover such services. The agreement would contain at least two parts with the first phase covering preliminary design work at an estimated lump'su:: cost of $6,000. The second phase of the agreement would cover subsequent working design work which would be commenced upon authorization from the city. It will be necessary to present this agreement for council review, consideration, and action at the April 24, 1978 city council meeting to enable us to continue to maintain a schedule ;which will ultimately provide for use of a new golf course in 1980. Respectfully submitted., Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: Public vVorks Director Park and Recreation Director Finance Director City Attorney l BRAUER AND ASSOCIATES 1972 Phalen Park and Golf Course - City of St. Paul, Minnesota Master Plan Como Park and Golf Course - City of St. Paul, Minnesota Master Plan Golf Course Feasibility Study - City of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota Wayzata Country Club - 18 hole Par 3 General reshaping to tie into Highway 12 reconstruction LaFayette Club Rehab design and construction 1973 Front Range Golf Course - City of Denver, Colorado (through Denver branch) South Suburban Golf Course - City of Denver, Colorado (through Denver branch) Golf /Ski Feasibility Study - City of LeSeur, Minnesota Golf /Nature Center Feasibility Study - City of Fridley, Minnesota Mankato Golf Course - City of Mankato, Minnesota Construction revisions to exisiting municipal course Brook Tree Golf Course - Owatonna - Kaplan, Minnesota Master Plan Minnehaha Country Club - Sioux Falls, South Dakota Master Plan to expand existing 9 to 18 Cannon Falls Golf Course - Cannon Falls, Minnesota Master Plan (Housing program also planned and since implemented) Floyd Park Golf Course - Sioux City, Iowa Master Plan Southview Country Club - South St. Paul, Minnesota Rehab projects (periodic assignments for tees, greens and irrigation) 1974 Olympic Hills Golf Course - City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Feasibility Study for Purchase (recommended against purchase) Feasibility Study for Grand Rapids, Minnesota, Golf Course Brook Tree Golf Course (construction) Mankato Golf Course (construction) -rz I . ro . W71. -. i Brauer and Associates 1974 - continued Galls Golf Course - City of White Bear Lake Master Plan 1975 Pokegama Golf Course - Grand Rapids, Minnesota Master Plan and Construction Documents Carl Johnson (private developer - housing and golf) - Sioux City, Iowa Master Plan and Feasibility Study 1976 Brook Tree Golf Course - Grand Opening Floyd Park Golf Course - Construction Documents Pokegama Golf Course - Continuing (including bid and construction) 1977 Floyd Park Golf Course - Construction Moorhead Municipal Golf Course - City of Moorhead, Minnesota Feasibility Study, Master Plan, Construction Documents, Bid (Construction in 1978, open in 1979) Battle Creek Regional Park - Ramsey County, Minnesota Golf Course /Ski Feasibility Study Pokegama Golf Course - Construction (open in 1978) a Av� �'+. � 4 '�i. -. �; � �.3- �j �. d a7►� „i 'f'C.- s; � �'. _" � � °a>'• �:{ �. �`. R . ZQ.� y -� . y / / ^I %�`'P. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 133 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Authorization to Call for Bids The 1977/83 Capital Improvement Program reserves funds for City Project No. 727, improvements to the central garage. This project involves a variety of repairs and improvements to the existing garage which are necessary to conform with Occupational Safety and Health Act requirements. This project has been scheduled to be implemented over three years and the first stage was completed in 1977. As part of this year's garage improvement project, it is proposed that bids be received for the purpose of installing concrete floors in the west garage building. The floor space to be surfaced is approximately 6,000 square feet in size. The engineer's estimate of cost of this work is $21,000. An appropriation of $15,000 in special revenue funds is included in the 1977/83 Capital Improvement Program for these improvements. A copy of the transitory ordinance appropriating the special revenue funds for this project is attached. Sufficient funds are remaining in the project account from the 1977 appropriation to fund the balance of the estimated cost. Specifications and plans have been prepared for this improvement work and are on file in the office of the Public Works Director. It is, therefore, recommended that the city council take the following actions: 1 . Authorize the advertisement for bids for renovations and improvements to the central garage; 2. Give first reading consideration to the transitory ordinance appropriating $15, 000 from the special revenue fund to financO these improvements. Respectfully s mitted, Wayne S. Burggraa City Manager Public Works Director cc: Finance Director TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 16.46. AN ORDINANCE FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The City of Richfield does ordain: Section 1 . It is found and determined necessary and expendient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, and are further de- tailed in the City's 1977 -1983 Capital Improvement Program and are projects which the City would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. , Section 2. The capital improvements and the amounts of expenditure for such improvements, which are hereby authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, subdivision 4 of the City Charter, are as follows: General Public Improvements $15,000 Section 3. The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by Council resolution. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , 1978. Loren L. Law Ma yor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk z CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Letter No. 132 Agenda May 8, 1978 Gentlemen: Subject: Proposed Wine Licensing Ordinance council meeting the city council deferred to At the April 24, 197 8 city ordinance. This matter wine licensing when Mr. James May 8 consideration of a proposed council meeting 2 Street, asked was initiated at the March 13, 1978 city ion of a wine licensing owner of the Lemon Tree Restaurant adop West 77 1/ Assimes, give consideration to th the city council to considering a urant and desired to be able to sery asked ordinance. Mr. Assimes advised ta that he was seriously council complete renovation of his the city in connection with a new food menu. sed ordinance fogcouncil consideration. the city attorney to prepare p re ared a draft of a proposed ordinance dealing The city attorney hasp P A copy of the proposed ordin- with the issuance of on -sale wine licenses. attorney has indicated that this draft very ance is attached. The city currently has concerning closely parallels the regulations which the city April 24 meeting there the issuance of on -sale liquor licenses. in the proposed ordinance. At the was brief consideration g iven to three items relates to a requirement for minimum ordinance, should be ere The first item osed is to be a minimum floor area requirement 3 one page 1 of the Prop inserted in Section 11.08, subdivision 1 () suggested at the ordinance. A 4800 square foot minimum final decision was made thi.s matter. last city council meeting, but no The second item that was considered related to ahma number, number of licenses to be permitted. If there e to be a requirement s on-sale, liquor licenses, then this figure should be inserted Lt� Section 11.0 on -sale wine 11cen ordinance. T ,-sale liquor licenses to subdivision 2 on page 2 of the proposed currently restricts the number of 01 cessary that the number license ordinance it is not n no more than seven licenses. However, ' enses permitted be the same as the number of on -sale liquor of wine licenses licenses permitted. iii AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XI AND APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD City of Richfield does ordain: i. Chapter XI of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield relating to liquor and intoxicating beverage control is hereby amended by adding after Section ll.U7 therein, the following new Section: 1111.08 ON -SALE WINE Subdivision 1. Definitions. The following terms have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: (1) The term "wine" means and includes all vinous beverages not exceeding 14 percent alcohol _ by volume. (2) "Sale" and "sell" and ".sold" mean all barters and all manners of furnishing wine including such furnishing in violation or evasion of law. (3) The term "restaurant" means any establishment under the control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities to serve meals in one or more dining_ rooms having a total area of at least square feet, and where in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public, and which employs an adequate staff for the usual and suitable service to its guests and the principal part of the business of which is the serving of foods. The area to be used in computing-such square foot minimum shall be the gross floor area of the restaurant including wine. Basement areas, however, shall not be counted for the purpose of meeting such _ square foot minimum requirement. (4) The term "on -sale" means the sale of wine by the glass, or by the drink for consumption -2 on the premises only. (5) "Minor" means any person under the age of 19 years. Subd. 2. License Required. No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers, to the extent authorizd under state license, shall directly or indirectly deal in, sell, or keep for sale wine for "on- sale" sale without first having received a license-to do so as provided in this section, or as provided in section 11.06 of this code. "On -sale" wine licenses shall be issued only to restaurants. No more than _ "on -sale" licenses may be issued to restaurants. Subd. 5. Applications for Licenses to be Verified. Every application for an' "on- sale" license shall be verified and filed with the city clerk. Subd. 4. Contents of Application. In addition to C information which may be required by the state liquor control commissioner, th.e applicant shall state: (1) Whether the applicant is a natural person, corporation, partnership, or other form of organization. (2) If the applicant is a natural person, the following information shall be furnished: (a) True name, place and date of birth, and street residence of applicant. (b) Whether applicant has ever used or been known by a name other than his true name, and, if so, what was such name, or names, and information concerning dates and places where used. (c) The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a designation, name or style other than the full individual name of the _ applicant. (d) Whether applicant is married, or single. If married, true name, place and date of birth and street residence address of applicant.'s- present spouse. (e) Whether applicant and present spouse are registered voters, and, if so, where. -3- (f) Street addresses at which applicant and present spouse have lived during the preceding ten years. (g) Whether the applicant in the case of a natural person, or his spouse, or the manager and all persons holding or possessing an interest in the business to be licensed have ever been convicted for violation of any law of the United States, State of Minnesota, or any otheristat•e or territory or any municipal ordinance. (h) Whether applicant or his spouse has ever been engaged as an employee or in operating a saloon, hotel, restuarant, cafe, tavern or other business of a similar nature. If so, applicant shall furnish information as to the time, place and length of time. (i) Whether applicant has ever been in military service. If so, applicant shall, upon request, exhibit all discharges. (j) The name, address and business address of each person who is engaged in Minnesota in the business of selling, manufacturing or distributing wine or intoxicating liquor and who is nearer of kin to the applicant or his spouse than second cousin, whether of whole or half blood, or who is a brother -in -law or sister -in -law of the applicant or his spouse. (3) If the applicant is a parteenship, the names and addresses of all partners and all information concerning each partner as is required of a single applicant in Paragraph (2) above. A managing partner., or partners, shall be designated. The interest of each partner in the business shall be disclosed. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the application. (4) If the applicant is a corporation or other orgnization and is applying for an "on -sale" license, the following information shall be furnished: (a) The name, and, if incorporated, the state of incorporation. (b) A true copy of the certificte of incorporation, articles of incorporation or association agreement and bylaws. (c) The name of the manager. or : z- .- .- Ir a 1 •rt Y W. -a fir-. -� _._ "_1 - e proprietor or other agent in charge of the premises to be licensed, giving all the information about said person as is required of a single applicant in Paragraph (2) above. (d) A list of all natural persons who, singly or together with their spouse, or a parent, brother, sister or child of either of them, own or control an interest in said corporation or association, together with their addresses and all other information required of a single applicant in Paragraph (2) above. (5) The exact legal description of the premises to be licensed together with a plot plan of the area showing dimensions, location of buildings, street access, parking facilities and the locations of and distances to the nearest church buiia-ing and scnooi grounus. (6) The floor number and street number where the "on- sale" sale of wine is to be conducted and the rooms where wine is to be consumed. An applicant for an "on- sale" license shall submit a floor plan of the dining room, or dining rooms, which shall be open to the public, shall show dimensions and shall indicate the number of persons intended to be served in each of said rooms. (7) If a permit from the federal government is required by the laws of the United States, whether or not such permit has been issued, and, if so requred, in what name issued, and the nature of the permit. (8) The amount of the investment that the applicant has in the business, building, premises, fixtures, furniture, stock in trade, etc., and proof of the source of such money. (9) The names and addresses of all persons, other than the applicant, who have any financial interest in the business, buildings, premises, fixtures, furniture, stock in trade; the nature of such interest, amount thereof, terms for payment or other reimbursement. This shall include, but not be limited to, any lessees, lessors, mortgagees, mortgagors, lendors, lien holders, trustees, trustors and persons who have co- signed notes or otherwise loaned, pledged, or extended security for any indebtedness of the M13 application. (10) The names, residences and business addresses of three persons, residents of Hennepin County, of good moral character, not related to the applicant or financially interested in the, premises of business, who may be referred to as to the applicant's character or in the case where information is required of a manager, thei manager's character. (11) Whether or not all real estate and personal property taxes for the premises to be licensed have been paid and, if not paid, the years for which delinquent. (12) Whenever the application for an "on- sale" license, or for a transfer thereof, is for premises either planned or under construction or undergoing substantial alteration, the application shall be accompanied by a set of preliminary plans showing the design of the proposed premises to be licensed. If the plans or design are on file with the city engineer., no plans need to be filed with the city clerk. (13) Such other information as the city council shall require. (14) Proof that the applicant has complied with all of the procedures required under the zoning regulations of the city to qualify the proposed licensed premises as an approved location. The council shall not act upon an application for a license until all such regulations have been complied with and final approval of site and building plans have been given by the council. Subd. 5. Execution of Application. If the application is by a natural person, by an officer thereof; if by a partnership, by one of the partners; if by an unincorporated association, by the manager or managing officer. thereof. If the applicant is a partnership, any license, bond and insurance policy issued shall be in the names of all partners. Subd. 6. Renewal Application. Applications for the renewal of�an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to the date of the expiration of the license and shall be made in such abbreviated form as the city council may approve. If, in the judgment of the council., good and sufficient cause is shown by any applicant for his failure to file for a renewal within the time provided, the council may, if the other provisions of this section are complied with, waive this requirement and grant the application. Subd. 7. Accountant's Statement. At the earliest practicable time after application is made for a renewal of an "on- sale" license, and in any event prior to the time that the application is approved by the council, the applicant shall file with the city clerk a statement made by a certified public accountant that shows the total gross sales and the total food sales of the restaurant for the 12 -month period immediately preceding the date for filing renewal applications. Subd. 8. License Fees. The following provisions control as to license fees and related subjects: (1) The annual license fee for an on -sale license shall be as established. in Appendix D of this Code. (2) At the time of each original application for a license, one -half the annual license fee shall be paid when the application is filed and the remaining balance shall be paid before the license is issued. At the time of renewal of a license, the total annual license fee shall be paid when the application is filed. All licenses expire on June 30 of each year. When an original license ib issued for a portion of a year, the license fee shall be prorated at the rate of one - twelfth of the annual license fee per month or portion of a month remaining in the license year. All fees shall be paid into the general fund of the city. Upon rejection or withdrawal of any application for a license, the license fee shall be refunded to the applicant except where rejection or withdrawal is for a willful misstatement in the license application. (3) At the time of each original application for a license, the applicant shall also pay an investigating fee as provided in Appendix D of -7- this Code. The investigating fee shall not be subject to refund. If the expenses of the investigation relating to an application exceed the investigating fee paid, the city shall notify the applicant of this fact and shall require the applicant to pay an additional investigating fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code which the city manager deems necessary to complete its - investigation of the applicant. The applicant shall pay such an additional investigating fee within five (5) days of being so notified. If such additional investigating fee is not paid within such 5 -day period, the city shall discontinue consideration of the application. (4) No part of the fee paid for any license shall be refunded except in accordance with this section or with city council action. (5) At any time that an additional investigation is required because of a change in the ownership, interest or control of a partnership or a corporation, the licensee shall pay an additional investigative fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code. Subd. 9. Granting of Licenses. The following procedure shall be followed in processing applications for licenses under this section: (1) All applications for a license shall be referred to the public safety director., and to such other city department as the city manager shall deem necessary, for verification and investigation of the facts set forth in the application. The chief of police shall cause to be made such investigation of the information requested in Subdivision 4 as shall be necessary and shall make a written recommendation ana report to the city council which shall include a list of all violations of federal or state law or municipal regulations. (2) Upon completion of the manager's preliminary report and within 20 days thereafter, the manager may recommend to the council that a public hearing be held upon the application. The council shall then instruct the city clerk to cause to be published in the official newspaper 10 days in advance, a notice of the hearing to be _ _I ._._ —IF MI Y a J OV . . .. - .. — • —. . 1 • held by the city council, setting forth the day, time and place when the hearing will be held, the name of the applicant, the premises where the business is to be conducted, and such other information as the council may direct. At the hearing opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard for or against the granting of the license. After the hearing the council may either grant or deny the license. If the license is- granted, the council may withhold its issuance until the applicant has qualified in all respects for the license. If the premises to be licensed are not complete at the time that the hearing is conducted the council may grant the license but shall withhold its issuance until the premises have been completed in accordance with the representations made by the applicant. If a license has been granted but its issuance has been withheld pending completion of the premises to be licensed, and if the licensee does not proceed with reasonable dispatch to ready the premises, the council may rescind the action granting the license. Such action shall not be taken, however, without giving the licensee at least eight days' notice of the time and place of a hearing on the proposed rescission. (3) Each license shall be issued to the applicant only. Each license shall be issued only for the premises described in the application. (4) The clerk shall, within 10 days after the issuance of any license under this section, submit to the liquor control commissioner_ the full name and address of each person granted a license, the trade name, the effective license date, and the date of expiration of the license. He shall also submit to the liquor control commissioner any change of address, transfer, cancellation, or revocation of any license by the council during the license period. Subd. 10. Person Ineligible for License_ No license shall be granted to or held by any person: (1) Who is ineligible under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340. (2 ) Who is a minor. (3) Who is not of good moral character and -9- repute. (4) Who, if an individual, is an alien. (5) Who, within five years prior to the application for such license, has been convicted of any willful violation of any law of the United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other state or territory, or of any local ordinance, with regard to the manufacture, sale, distribution, or possession for sale or distribution of i . intoxicating liquor or wine, or whose liquor or wine license has been revoked for any willful violation of any such laws or ordinances. (6) Who is a manufacturer or wholesaler of intoxicating liquor. (7) Who is directly or indirectly interested in any other establishment in the city to which a license has been issued under this section or under. Section 11.06 of this Code. The word "interested" as used in this paragraph includes any pecuniary interest in the ownership, operation, management or profits of such an establishment. (8) Who, if a corporation, does not have a manager who is eligible pursuant to the provisions of this section or whose corporate stock is owned or subject to the beneficial interest of any person or the spouse of any person ineligible for licensure under paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this subdivision. (9) Who is the spouse of a person ineligible for a license under paragraphs 4, 5 or 6 of this subdivision and who, in the judgment of the city council, is not the real party in interest or beneficial owner of the business operated, or to be operated, under the license. (10) A license may not be granted or renewed, if, in the case of an individual, the licensee is not a resident of the city at the time of issuance; if, in the case of a partnership, the managing partner is not a resident of the city at the time of issuance; or, in the case of a corporation, if the manager is not a resident of the city at the time of issuance. Any "on -sale" license, once issued, shall be effective only as' long as the licensee, the managing partner, or the manager, as the case may be, remains a resident of -10- the city. Subd. 11. Ineligibility for License. Existence of any of the following con ld tions render any applicant ineligible for receipt of a license: (1) No license shall be granted, or renewed, for operation on any premises, on which taxes, assessments or other financial claims of the city or of the state are due, delinquent and unpaia. In the event any action has been commenced pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 278, questioning the amount of validity of taxes, the city council may, on application by the licensee, waive strict compliance with this provision; no waiver may be granted, however, for taxes on any portion thereof, which remain unpaid for a period exceeding one year after becoming due. (2) No license shall be granted for a foreign corporation. (3) No license shall be issued for the premises owned by a person to whom a license may C not be granted under this section, except an owner who is a minor or an alien. (4) No "on- sale" license shall be granted for a restaurant which does not comply in all respects with the definition of a restaurant as contained in Subdivision 1 of this section, nor to any restaurant which does not have a total market value, including land, building and equipment, of at least $500,000, as appraised by the city assessor based upon appraisal data having a base date of January 1, 1970. (5) No "on- sale" license shall be granted restaurants unless they are located in general commercial or industrial areas. Subd. 12. Conditions Governing Issuance. The following conditions govern issuance of a license pursuant to this section: (1) Every license shall be granted subject to the provisions of this section and of any other applicable ordinance or law. (2) The license shall be pasted in a conspicuous place in the licensed premises at all times. -11- (3) Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of his place of business and for the conditions of sobriety and order in the place of business and on the premises. (4) No "on-sale" licensee small sell wine - "off- sale ". (5) No license shall be effective beyond the compact and contiguous space shown in the license application for such license. (6) No minor shall be employed in any rooms constituting the place in which wines are sold at retail "on- sale ", except that minors may be employed to perform the duties of a bus boy or dishwashing services in restaurants licensed under the provisions of this section. (7) No wine shall be sold or furnished or delivered to any intoxicated person, to any habitual drunkard, to a minor or to any person to whom sale is prohibited by state law. (8) No licensee or any of his employees shall keep, possess, or operate or permit the keeping, possession or operation of any slot machine, dice, or any gambling device or apparatus on the licensed premises, or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, nor shall any such person permit any gambling therein. (9) No licensee or any of his employees shall knowingly permit the licensed premises or any room in those premises or any adjoining building directly or indirectly under his control to be used as a resort for prostitutes. (10) Any police officer, health officer, sanitarian, building inspector or any properly designated officer or employee of the city shall have the unqualified right to enter, inspect and search the premises of the licensee during business hours without a warrant. (11) No "on- sale" liquor establishment shall displav wine to the public during hours when the sale of liquor is prohibited by this ordinance. (12) No licensee shall apply for or possess a federal wholesale or retail liquor dealer's special tax stamp or a federal gambling stamp. (13) Changes in the corporate or association officers, corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws or partnership agreement, as -, r ._.."6` , 4 -i ?l 'T . -Y si 7'. , . - --P-. - 9 -12- the cases may be, shall be submitted to the city clerk not less than 30 days before such changes are to be made. In the case of a corporation, the licensee shall notify the city clerk when a person not listed in the original application acquires an interest which, together with that of his spouse, parent, brother, sister or child, exceeds 50. Such notice shall be given not less than 3U days from the date of the proposed transfer. (14) At the time a licensee submits his application for renewal of a license, he shall state the nature or amount of any contribution he has made for campaign or political purposes, the person to whom the contribution was made and the person or organization for whom intended. (15) A restaurant shall be conducted in such a manner that the principal part of the business for a license year is the serving of foods. (16) Restaurants shall display a sign calling attention to the open bottle law. (17) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale, C or keep for sale, wine in any original package which has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall directly or through any other person delete or in any manner tamper with the contents of any original package so as to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original package. Possession on the premises by the licensee of any wine in the original package differing in the composition or alcoholic content in the wine when received from the manufacturer_ or wholesaler from whom it was purchased shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the original package has been diluted, changed or tampered with. (18) The business records of the licensee, including federal and state tax returns, shall be available for inspection by the city manager_, or other duly authorized representatives of the city or the city council at all reasonable times.. Subd. 13. Bond. (1) At the time of filing an application for an "on- sale" license, the applicant shall file a bond with corporate surety with the city clerk. Such bond shall be in the amount of $10,000.00. i -13- The licensee shall keep such bond or any substituted bond in the same amount and with the same terms in full force and effect throughout the license period. (2) The surety bond required by paragraph (1) of this subdivision shall be subject to the approval of the city attorney as to form and execution. (3) The surety on such bond shall be'a' surety company duly licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota. All surety bonds, when approved by the proper city officers, shall be deposited with the city clerk. (4) All such bonds shall be conditioned as follows: (a) The licensee will obey the law relating to the licensed business. (b) That the licensee will pay to the city when due all taxes, license fees, penalties and other changes provided by law. (c) That in.the event of violation of any law relating to the business for which the license has been granted for the sale of wine, the bond shall be forfeited to the city. (5) All such bonds shall provide that no cancellation for any cause can be made either by the bonding company or the applicant, without said person first. giving 30 days` written notice to the city, addressed to the city manager, of intention to cancel the bond. Subd. 14. Liability Insurance. (1) Prior to the issuance of an "on- sale" wine license, the applicant shall file with the city clerk (a) a public liability insurance policy providing coverage of at least $250,000 and $500,000 and (b) a liquor liability policy covering liabilities under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.96 and providing coverage of at least $100,000 and $300,000. The city shall be named as an additional party insured on each of such policies. (2) Such policies shall provide that no cancellation for any cause shall be made by either the insured or the insurer without first giving written notice of such cancellation to the city at -14- least 30 days prior to the effective date of the cancellation. (3) Such policies of insurance shall further provide that no payment of any claim by the insurance company shall in any manner decrease the coverage provided for in respect to any other claim or claims brought against the insured or the insuring company. (4) Such policies shall be subject to- - approval of the city attorney as to form and executign and shall be issued by companies who are duly licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota. Such policies, when approved by the proper city officials, shall be deposited with the city clerk. Subd. 15. Hours and Days of Operation. The sale of wine is prohibited between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 8 :00 a.m. of any week day and any Saturday. Unless the license issued under this section provides for Sunday sale, no sale of wine may be made between 1:00 a.m. Sunday and 1:00 a.m. Monday of each week. Subd. lb. Restrictions Involving Sale to Minors. (1) No licensee, nis agent or employee shall serve or dispense upon the licensed premises any wine to a minor; nor shall such licensee, or his agent or employee permit a minor to be furnished or consume any such wines on the licensed premises. (2) Any person who may appear to the licensee, his employees or agents to be a minor shall, upon demand of the licensee, his employee or agent, produce and permit to be examined an identification card, including a driver's license, or non - qualification certificate issued by the State Department of Public Safety. Subd. 17. Other Restrictions on Purchase or Consumption. (1) No person shall give, sell, procure or purchase wane for any person to whom the sale of wine is forbidden by law. (2) No person shall mix or prepare intoxicating liquor for "on- sale" consumption in -is- any public place not licensed in accordance with this code and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Subd. 18. Revocation. The city council may suspend or revoke an "on- sale" license for the violation of any provision or condition of this section or of any state law or federal law regulating intoxicating liquor or wine and shall revoke such license for any willful viola.ticn- which, under the laws of the state, is grounds for mandatory revocation. Subd. 19. Revocation_ Procedure. The licensee shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing pursuant to b4linnesota Statutes Sections 15.0418 and 15.0426 before the city council may vote whether to revoke or to suspend its license. No suspension shall exceed 60 days. Subd. 20. Licensing of Employees. (1) No persons shall work as a manager, bartender, cocktail waitress or in any capacity where such person sells or serves wine in premises licensed under this section, and no licensee shall permit any such person to be so employed, unless such person, within seven days after being first employed, shall apply for a license to engage in such business. No person may be so employed for any length of time if his license is denied or revoked. (2) An application for such license shall be filed with the city clerk upon forms provided by the city and such application shall be verified under oath and shall contain the following information: (a) The names and addresses of two residents of Hennepin County, Minnesota, who have known the applicant for a period of two years and who will vouch for the sobriety, honesty and general good character of the applicant. (b) A concise history of the applicant's previous employment. (c) The record, if any, of arrests and of convictions for crimes and misdemeanors other than traffic offenses. (3) The annual license fee for any such Biel: person shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code and shall be paid in advance. A license shall expire on June 30th next following its effective date. (4) The application shall be referred to the public safety department which shall investigate the facts set forth in the application and make a written report hereon at the earliest practicable time. If the police department recommends that such person be licensed, the city clerk shall issue the license forthwith. If the police department makes a recommendation that the license not be issued, the applicant, upon request, shall be entitled to a hearing before the city council and may offer evidence to prove the license should be issued. (5) No person shall be issued a license if it appears that he has committed an act which is a willful violation of Minnesota Statutes 340.07 through 340.40. (6) Any license issued hereunder may be revoked for any violation of this section or of C Minnesota Statutes 340.07 through 340.40 or for conviction of any crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. Subd. 21. Enlargement, Alterations or Extension of Premises. Proposed enlargement, alteration or extension of premises previously licensed shall be reported to the city clerk at or before the time application is made for a building permit for any such change and the licensee shall also give such information as is required by Subdivision 4. Subd. 22. Transfer of License. No transfer of any license required under this section shall be permitted until all of the provisions of this section have been met including the filing of an original application, the payment of all fees and the approval of the city council. A license transfer shall be deemed to have occurred when any of the following conditions exist: (1) Any expansion, material alteration or extension of the licensed premises intended to be-- used for the sale or consumption of wine, on -sale. (2) Any transfer of the license from person J } -17- to person or from place to place. (3) Any change in the business structure or organization of the licensee including, but not limited to, changes in the corporate or association officers, charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws or partnership agreement. (4) Any change in the legal or beneficial ownership of corporate stock which, together with the interest of a spouse, parent, brother; sister or child, involves 5% or more of the corporate stock. (5) The grant of any power of attorney, voting proxy, pledge or other assignment of the voting rights of corporate stock which will effect alone or in conjunction with any other assignment to the same assignee, his spouse, parent, brother, sister or child, 5% or more of the voting shares of stock. (6) The creation of any new pecuniary interest in the ownership operation management, or profits of the licensed business. (7) The existence of any other situation whereby individuals other than those listed in the original license application acquire a role in the management, operation or profit of the license." 2. Appendix D, Section 8 of the Ordinance Coae of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, is hereby amended by adding after paragraph (2)d, the following new subparagraph: "d. Wine 11.08 1 year $2,000.00" 3. Appendix D, Section 8 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, is hereby amended by adding after paragraph (3)b the following new subparagraph: ' "c. Wine establishment 11.08 $5 /year /person covered" Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , lg /g, ATTEST: Thomas Moran, City Clerk C Loren L. Law, Mayor— —" `Va�i - �m °ems �, wad 4 ,..� -. �- �� ... e ik�. wa .: •,, e � . , <e3 �� i� .. s�'i ab .:. '-� ��'. -, s 73Y�►?Ri -e. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 131 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Annual Dues for Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Mayor Law has requested that there be an item on the May 8 city council agenda for the purpose of informing council members of a dues increase for the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Information on this subject is attached. The annual dues for the City of Richfield for the 1978/79 year would be $3, 887 or $790 more than the current annual dues of $3, 097. This increase reflects the first increase in dues for this association membership in three years. WSB /eja 3 Mw- Res su itted, � �� Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager 4 r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 130 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Appointments to Human Rights Commission At the present time there are four positions to be filled on the Human Rights Commission. Two are for adult three year terms which expire in May of this year. Ms. Diane Olson who was appointed in February, 1978 to fill an unexpired three year term, has expressed a desire to be reappointed to a full three year term. Ms. Gen Bolger has advised the commission that she does not wisgZ to be re- appointed. Applications are attached from Charles Spain, William Stixrud and Phillip Magnuson who have expressed an interest in being appointed to this commission. There are also two vacant youth positions. Applications are attached from Jeanne Cosgrove and Dawn Nilsen, students at Richfield High School, who have expressed an interest in being appointed to this commission. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /e j a Date 'T— _�6. '7 _ . APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME APIA% 01 -%yA s ss- e-0-0 Last First. Middle HOME ADDRESS Street No. "t ,�-► City MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Zip Code Street No. City Zip Code ,PHONE: Home # Business R 3 7- APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission I Human Rights Commission_ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: ��1.✓' , '���f ��1����,.�.���f".i -/ .4r% ��' � rv,. iw'.� i/�'' { ,�wsJ �+tra'���eo.. L.P,( � s i L CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Lo p,% NJ '���� -'t-Aes'R - i4-WN A;z Date j anuary 2u , 1 \ APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD qA vJ _A&ISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NA ' `, Stixrud William John Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 6700 Pleasant Av. So. Richfield 55423 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Same as home actress. Street No. PHONE: Home 869 -4892 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped. Advisory Commission City Business None Zip Code Human Rights Commission X Civil Service Commission Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: It is difficult for me to express any qualifications for this position, as I have never held a position like this one before. The only qualification I feel I have is that I have always been concerned about people and their riTits. I a_.i very interested in governrlent, and ,,,,ish to learn about it directly. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: None 1. �) EGIA CITY 0F RICHFIELD �6 w APPLICATION FORM FOR INDIVIDUALS DESIRING T 1T O� MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COMMISSIONS OR COMM,�T City ;.,4 zger 1ti( '1 , Committee or commission for which application is being made Human Rights Comm. 2. Name Philip Harrison Magnuson 3. Residence address 6837 South Oliver Richfield 861 2647 W No. Street City Phone 4. Business address Hennepin --County 9300 Naner Golden Valley Deputy Sheriff' Name of employing agency Address Position Held i 5. Date of birth Marcb 15 1948 Month Date Year 6. Local organizational memberships and affiliations: i a. Mn Peace and Police Officers Assc b. Mn Memorial Society C. �. Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this Municipal Committee and why you are interested in serving. Associate in Arts Degree in Police Science and Sociology. Bachelor of Arts Degree in Police Science and Applied Psychology. Candidate for the Graduate School of Criminal Justice at the U of M. Four years service with the U.S. Coast Guard, an operation dedicated to the saving of human life and preservation of proocrty. I have heen a life long resident of Richfield and know the people and community well. I also read and study extensively the areas of human situations as well as work with human 8. Lint the names of three persons who are thoroughly acquainted with your quali ications dilemma on a daily hasis. Name Occupation Address Phone— James O'Connell Lumbar Executive 3811 Vicent 521 5426 fps Terry Belford Legal administrator 1907 Yorkshire 546 1826 3. Rick Meyers Sheriff's Deputy 824 2373 9. Signature of applicant-2 � � - Dates i ?C� `c c� /z, / �f . 19 7. APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD �� p ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTME AP 12 19re NAME G ©sgr�ri� �1cc. z�2C. ��G`►�.�.. ' ts�, �.r Last First Middle8i HOME ADDRESS' Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City PHONE: Home C?& 9- 7& Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Zip Code Planning Commission Human Rights Commission >< Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped. Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: T o-/ z 4 7hl,7 ���rt- Lrf- r��r�hic�lz_ �`z yo %�� CL 12 e C3- � CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: /D y2 OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency CG <<s Address = e. C--ei r Position Years w /finn/agency Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) A. 1-9? / -,5� . Full name Relationship Mailing address Phone number B, Full name name Relationship Mailing address Phone number C. Full name C � h�Q fjartiy�- �nq�O� Relationsh p /CGS /�zrIeYAW Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 Att: Eileen Anderson Date 1'�Oi �� ��� 191 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPQWM NAME / SC h w n Last First U Middle:. , �( �� ++ &4' IB Um .WrlG -111. HOME ADDRESSt 6a9 NEWton Ave, Sc.. R44-1PiEU Jr._ /J3 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home 26 /-(I/ %? Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped. Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: 1. a S C� ct .-�r OE! C`_S'O Y) `h G- d ut 'M c n R L I C 4 a r1 C C G "' m i %-4E L -at WG.St N^ Wan I Q A vagr. T CGo uoni- K WFJ w'4) 0)$E('S anj nm in4PE,_'i h j'� rE SEruin J-, of R'c.�1�if C; �1zEn5, CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITYACTIVITIES: WOO CA/Gkt_-Lit'1ECgin Churck C L L)'�r CvC'oI KS,rnyi. -)q <-, ram o cmc_I 7 ntjt-h F�ll��<<,c�,,n _ fin/.. ?,�•11�;FIc� Sn� -l-hnl I 1-1��t -�... �;c_hC�,F l�l I�',�1�. Sch�o � /�'• T v 1�1C�UEC nth n�' , C�j0'� 1FQ Cn CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 129 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000 Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that the city council must approve purchases of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1, 000. There are two such items on the city council agenda of May 8, 1978. Repainting and Body Work for GPM Fire Pumper The fire division of the public safety department currently owns a 1973 1250 GPM fire pumper engine which is used in first line status at the Portland Avenue station. This piece of equipment is presently in need of body work and repainting so that it may be maintained in adequate condition for continued future use. The public safety director has solicited two quotations to complete the necessary work. The first proposal, submitted by Allstate Peterbilt Company, Bloomington, was in the amount of $3,500 and the second from Metropolitan Truck and Body Repair, Inc. in Bloomington, for $2,335. It is the recommendation of the public safety director, in which I concur, that the city council accept the quotation submitted by Metropolitan Truck and Body Repair, Inc, in the amount of $2,335 for this repair work. Funds are available in the 1978 public safety budget appropriation to cover this necessary repair project. Bleachers Two all aluminum bleachers are to be purchased through the Christian Park project. The five row, fifteen foot bleachers are guaranteed for five years from all workmanship defects and will not rust. The staff has solicited three �r ti < 7 - " "r '114M'v Q' am " 4 41% Z*-: -s, 4% `°. —6 4% 46•- "1 455.'n. IN 1.W-1 a T. Council Letter No. 129 -2- May 8, 1978 quotations for bleachers, although the other two quotations were not for the guaranteed aluminum bleachers. It is the opinion of the park and recreation director, in which I concur, that the aluminum bleachers represent the best product and it is, therefore, recommended that the city council approve this purchase from Earl F. Anderson and Associates in the amount of $1,316. Funds are available in the Christian Park project for this purchase. Respectfully sub itted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc; Public Safety Director Park and Recreation Director Finance Director THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 128 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Moratorium on the Filling of Position Vacancies During the 1977 budget hearings, the city council established a moratorium on the filling of full time vacancies . This letter is to request that the moratorium be lifted to permit the filling of the following full time positions: Park Maintenance Man - -This vacancy is a result of a resignation effective May 2. This position is responsible for performing building and grounds maintenance work in the construction and maintenance of park and recrea- tional areas. Associate Planner - -This position is a full time permanent position with budgeted funds becoming available the last half of this year. This position will be responsible for preparing and submitting Richfield's comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976. In addition, this position is responsible for the preparation of the capital improvement program, general development plans and environmental impact statements. Since both of these positions are funded in the 1978 budget and are crucial positions in terms of workload, it is the recommendation of the staff that the moratorium be lifted to permit the filling of these positions. Respectfully submitted, I' Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager W SB /j kl cc. Personnel Director Finance Director Park & Recreation Director Planning & Redevelopment Director CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 127 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Variance, 817 East 66th Street Mr. Clifford Hoffman, 817 East 66th Street, has requested a variance to the service station canopy design requirements to allow him to construct a free - standing canopy at his existing service station located at that address. The following exhibits are attached to this council letter and will be referred to throughout: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Background Parcel Size: Existing Structures: Proposed Structures: Existing Zoning: Existing Land Use: Surrounding Zoning: Surrounding Land Use: Site plan Land use map Zonign map Picture of proposed canopy Elevation of proposed canopy Letter from applicant 125' x 134' (17,375 square feet) One 20' x 34' masonry building (680 square feet) vacant Existing structure and one 34' x 45' canopy (16 feet in height) Commercial General (C -2) None (vacant) N - Residence (R) E - Multiple Residence (MR) W- Commercial General (C -2) S - Commercial General (C -2) N - ?ublic E - Multiple Residence (MR) W- Commercial General (C -2) S - Commercial General (C -2) Council Letter No. 127 -2- May 8, 1978 Section 3.33 subdivision 6.2d of the zoning ordinance requires that canopies shall be designed and constructed as an integral part of the main service station building and shall extend from such building. The applicant is proposing to construct a freestanding canopy adjacent to an existing structure which will not be an integral part of the main building. A variance to the zoning ordinance requirements would, therefore, be necessary. Section 3.40, subdivision 6 of the zoning ordinance sets forth the conditions which must be met if a variance is to be granted. The city council should grant the variance only if all three conditions are present on the property for which the variance is requested. Staff Review The staff has reviewed the request for variance against these three conditions and found the following: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the particular land, building or use referred to in the applica- tion, not common to other properties in this or similar districts. It is the opinion of the staff that there are no special conditions affecting this property. While there could be problems associated with constructing a canopy onto the existing structure, similar problems would be faced at every other service station in the city which does not now have a canopy. 2. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the pre- servation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. It is the opinion of the staff that the variance is not necessary for the enjoyment of substantial property rights. The denial of the variance would not preclude the applicant from using the property as a service station or for any other use permitted in a general commercial district. 3. That the qrantinq of the variance will not materially and adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant and not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or iniurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood. The proposal would improve the property and neighborhood by returning a vacant, boarded up site to use and by upgrading the aesthetic appearance of the site . In reviewing the request for variance, the staff noted that the existing curb cuts on the site create dangerous traffic movements in the area. The entrance drives are laid out in such a manner that traffic enters and exits the site at 45- degree angles rather than at a 90- degree angle. Such angle drives Council Letter No. 127 -3- May 8, 1978 cut down the field of vision which can be a contributing cause for accidents. The staff also noted that the number of curb cuts into the site (four) encourages unsafe turning movements and conflicts with the city's adopted comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan indicates that "major streets will have restricted left -turn movements and restricted access to adjacent properties, in order to reduce accident potential and avoid congestion caused by slow traffic and turning movements....." The staff also found that the east curb cut on 66th Street is located only 30 feet from the 66th Street - Elliot Avenue intersection, which is also a violation of city ordinance. Staff Recommendation The staff finds that the three conditions which must be met before a variance may be granted are not met on this property. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the staff that the variance not be granted. If the council feels that the conditions to grant a variance are met and wishes to grant the variance, the staff would recommend that the following stip- ulations be attached to the variance: 1. That all entrance drives be changed so that the traffic enters and exits the site at a 90- degree angle to the streets. 2. That the east curb cut on 66th Street and the south curb cut on Elliot Avenue be closed. 3. That the north curb cut on Elliot Avenue be moved south to ease the traffic flow through the service station pump islands and help discourage through traffic from the adjacent residential neighborhood. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission reviewed the request for a variance at its April 25, 1978 meeting. One area resident appeared in favor of the proposal. The planning commission voted to recommend to the council that the variance to build an unattached canopy be granted with no stipulations. The commission also passed a motion recognizing the safety problems and the egress and ingress problems on the site and requested that the staff and the applicant attempt to resolve these problems. Respectfully s mitted, WM Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director 0 N z fJ Y � m T - p iz x ^z rl :j ^t 0 J v ,c `r Dr � n zr r O 1 7) l 1 zo J 3 z O > m V O —1 r- m rl n V• p 77 � °� z :ii � i D Ln 1 � 2 D O •2 � • 1 f a I• N f• S p \ oC -..—moo ' \`.•�\ '-. ��� \... � \��� Z-' D 4 i A c io c oc fp '� -Z M p 11J cA VU ➢ _ c> .t ID hr e ' 2 M r3 O > m V O —1 r- m rl n V• p 77 � °� z :ii � i D Ln 1 � 2 D O •2 � • 1 f n Z 0 1 r i v Z � 1 'v ^ c 0 �Q v r 0 0 u EXHIBIT { B Use Map fly and Go W a I Al 04 M51 1 g h 04 _ , — A : 4 )i )0 151.)0 12 ��', 1)l.1 111.)5 131 6i jN do 131.4 � ` 10 ,54e —'..e ). it 150.1 r ;01 J t)o 3 14 a .1 1N.ti io.1 1 . 14% 110-14 to 9 M-Ot 1lo.le 1 ;1.55 � it 1.41 1 1 30 to IN Ot !; 4 131.01 �i5t.6G__•.._J I)i.o4 131.04 ,� 1)1.04 01-11 ;1.1 14 , )1.14 1 1)114 °• ,,'-P 4 )i )0 151.)0 12 ��', 1)l.1 111.)5 131 I 1 131.4 � ` 10 ,54e —'..e ). it 150.1 ! 1 11 5° J io. Go C a 0 131.04 ,� 1)1.04 r— C- 16 Ry.n h°° 1 5 l .IL 131.12 1)l.1 q4, i)O Gj lull 150.1 ! 1 11 5° io. )0 4 OK N.10 1N.ti 130-16 to 9 M-Ot 11110Z ST. W W- Sol Q 11�L 41 IUBLIC Go 0 0 Ay4 SS3 < TINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ;OMMERCIAL 131.04 ,� 1)1.04 r— C- 16 Ry.n h°° 1 5 l .IL 131.12 1)l.1 1)I i OK 31.)0 1N.ti 1)1.)5 1 ;1.55 it 1.41 1 1 !; 4 1)1.53 W W- Sol Q 11�L 41 IUBLIC Go 0 0 Ay4 SS3 < TINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ;OMMERCIAL )U 14 o RF7, 1110 4* %0 N A sl JI A9.0 ?a55', J '_"'21158 ii =;ri 9_ ;Wmow' tb"Il�Jpjmi mwhmft+ n ill. 0' %0 ill. 0' %0 --in--EAST- M.— OtA- Ir .471 294.4h, 3o j l $1 If it i! <11 ;4 n [ _il �V' 10 AtI13 � al"I QP 00 'U'O Not S T Zoning Map ui NM Qw ;i - ILE 14 $r ,'6 34 : _ �4 K_ d IT% 51 67th Noe 60 R, .4 IL titJ 1t pV z 131 ii 0 10 "V41 EXHIBIT �-C i•O r SETS MIOMMI-InK, E A U10 a ST. 14 0, , i3LOO ` 1510 411 53 7. T 46� 4 NH qfh 1114 :1114 il.4 5' 5 N 15 ca m 44 S T Zoning Map ui NM Qw ;i - ILE 14 $r ,'6 34 : _ �4 K_ d IT% 51 67th Noe 60 R, .4 IL titJ 1t pV z 131 ii 0 10 "V41 EXHIBIT �-C i•O r SETS MIOMMI-InK, E A U10 a ST. 14 0, , i3LOO ` 1510 411 53 7. T 46� 4 NH qfh 1114 :1114 il.4 5' 5 N 15 ca m 44 titJ 1t pV z 131 ii 0 10 "V41 EXHIBIT �-C i•O r SETS MIOMMI-InK, E A U10 a ST. 14 0, , i3LOO ` 1510 411 53 7. T 46� 4 NH qfh 1114 :1114 il.4 5' 5 N 15 ca m 44 EXHIBIT �-C i•O r SETS MIOMMI-InK, E A U10 a ST. 14 0, , i3LOO ` 1510 411 53 7. T 46� 4 NH qfh 1114 :1114 il.4 5' 5 N 15 ca m 44 �W MONI'1OR9 INC. P. 0. BOX 1315 SHERMAN, TEXAS 75090 Phone: (214) 893 -6336 ham -: American Oil Div, of Std. Oil Herman Schmidt, Eng. Job Site: 55th and M. L. King Dr. Chicago, III. 24'x66' and 24'x50' Job 2294 M O N l T O R 9 INC..— um/� and dt�tefez cS'e7vice, Inc P. O. BOX 1315 SHERMAN, TEXAS 75090 2711 EAST FRANKLIN MINNEAPOLIS, MILAN. 55406 Phone: (214) 893 6336 PHONE: 338 -5831 Illustration of Solid Backing For Shake Shingles r -Ti bi VI r) z 0 —T) ra of -A- -f 7-7 Ut T P"011a a"d MedeA s &u4ae, -low. I°� . , i -- �y' i. Ll�s) �ti•�•reaawv�t:tavm.vmwas�nusaa+ April 7, 1978 S E�;zJ CE • SA?I ES • LLt.T'O\ 2711 EAST FRANKLIN AVE. - (612) 338 -5831 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55406 To Members of the City of Richfield Planning and Zoning Commission Mr Clifford Hoffman, APCO dealer at 817 - 66 Street, Richfield, MN is asking for approval to erect a 34' width x 45' length canopy 16 feet in heighth from the ground to the top of the canopy with the underneath side enclosed. The canopy will not be directly attached to the building. It will, however, blend in with the building facia and will appear to be part of the building. Mr Hoffman is desirous of the canopy to improve the appearance of the location and to protect his customers from inclement weather, since the location will be completely self-service. The installation of electronic self- service gasoline dispensers and the canopy will certainly upgrade the property and improve the location in the neighborhood. P ase a ise ifs O D Lew' pl you have any questions. M E M 8 E R Fueling Systems — Electronic Gauging & TEL Auto Seri Equipment Compressors Inventory Controls — Fiberglass Tanks & Pipe �rw[a.. L Auto Lifts & Parts — Service Station Pumps CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 126 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield _ Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Zoning District Change, 6629 Harriet Avenue Mr. Carl McBride of Richfield State Agency, 6625 Lyndale Avenue ha s reques =ed that the zoning district designation of property located at 6629 Harriet Avenue be changed from Residence (R) to General Commercial (C -2). This change is requested in order to allow expansion of an existing parking lot adjacent to the property at 6629 Harriet Avenue. In accordance with city ordinance requirements, the request for re- zoning was initiated by a petition of owners of at least fifty percent of the land within three hundred feet of the site proposed for rezoning. The following items are attached to this council letter and will be referred to throughout: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Background Parcel Size: Existing Structures: Proposed Structures: Site Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Surrounding Zoning: Site plan Petition Land use map Zoning map Comprehensive Plan L /H /N Redevelopment Plan 55' x 128' (7,040 square feet) one dwelling (728 square feet) built in 1939 and detached garage (240 square feet) The existing structures will be removed and the site will be used as part of the adjacent parking lot. Residence (R) General Commercial (C -2) Parking lot accessory to a commercial use N- general commercial (C -2) E- residence (R) W- general commercial (C -2) S- residence (R) Council Letter No. 126 -2- May 8, 1978 Surrounding Land Use: Comprehensive Plan: Staff Review N- commercial E- single family residential W- commercial S- single family residential The comprehensive plan indicates central business district mixed land use of high/ medium density. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed rezoning would be in compliance with what the comprehensive plan indicates for this area. The comprehensive plan indicates high /medium density central business district mixed land use, which includes a combination of offices, retail commercial entertainments, and eating establishments, small comparison shopping and service businesses, institutional, limited cultural or recrecational facilities and multiple dwellings. The proposed parking lot would be an accessory use to adjacent office and service business uses. Because the proposed use would be accessory to primary uses which comply with the comprehensive plan, the requested rezoning would, therefore, be in compliance with the comprehensive plan. Lynda le /Hub /Nico lie t Redevelopment Plan: Because the site of the proposed rezoning is within the boundaries of the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet Redevelopment Project, staff has reviewed the request for consistency with the L /H /N Rede- velopment Plan. The staff finds that the proposed rezoning would not only be consistent with the redevelopment plan, but is also essential to implementing the plan. The redevelopment plan indicates office /commercial and accessory parking uses for the area of the site. In order to implement the redevelopment plan it will be necessary to rezone not only the parcel in question, but also all of that part of the block bounded by 66th Street, 67th Street, Harriet Avenue and Grand Avenue which is not now zoned general commercial. Relationship to Existing Zoning and Other Developmental Considerations: The area to the north and west of the property is presently zoned and used for commercial development. The proposed rezoning would, therefore, seem to be consistent with the character of the area. The long range effect of converting residential property to commercial uses must also be considered, however. The conversion and loss of resi- dential property could in the future limit the city's ability to provide suitable housing for low and moderate income people. This could, in turn, limit the city' s ability to receive federal financial assistance. Conversion of residential property into commercial uses could also be in- consistent with city policy to maintain the residential character of Richfield. Council Letter No. 126 -3- May 8, 1978 The staff feels, however, that any potential negative effects of the rezoning would be offset by the benefits which the city will receive from the Lynda le /Hub /Nicollet redevelopment project in terms of aesthetics, increased tax base and the increased number of dwelling units provided for in the L /H /N plan. Since the applicant intends to move the house now located on the property at 6629 Harriet to a suitable location, the proposed rezoning will not actually eliminate a residence in the community. Staff Recommendation In summary, the staff finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan and with the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet redevelopment plan and that the proposed rezoning would have minimal effects on the character of the neighborhood. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation that the city council grant the requested rezoning with the stipulation that the property be used for a parking lot as proposed and that the applicant agree to move the existing house to a suitable residential area. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission considered this request for rezoning at their April 25, 1978 meeting. Although several area residents were present at that meeting, only one resident appeared in conjunction with this application for rezoning. The planning commission voted to recommend that the city council approve the rezoning of the property located at 6629 Harriet Avenue, subject to the following stipulation: 1. That the lot be used for parking as proposed. It is recommended that the council give first reading approval to the requested change in the zoning district for 6629 Harriet Avenue and direct the city attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance amendment for publication. Respectfully sub fitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: City Attorney City Clerk Planning and Redevelopment Director a w a _EXISTING PARKING LOT W 66TH ST u DR SCHAFFHAUSEN i DR SANFILIPPO i ,I w i o � a i ❑ ------ - - - - -- PARCEL TO BE -----_ REZONED r 1" = 50' I ...ie Plan - - - - - -- - - - - - - �„ '^10.x`' _ � t - � �' `�, ,'� _• Y_ �' n •, < ¢ m ... _ will or MAW ................ ....... e �r•a r \i• • ¢ ��.. o�,.f)_ - �` !• i ' i r f� Z} {cam 6 -:m OO X vn . yy rn El I L4 bNO 2N 080 boo •°�_ �, �. �`'P+„�, y'� f ` v, �„ -.,.� � i _ � \- '�_. s !E4'ay O - y►�1r. a - M OLLET A*V . - � i . r ,. :.,i. _ � i � � '•� � �.s� � � ;'�l.,l'�' Ste` rP�'� � ' .�� `{ $�` • tea' +,� . fr a .> ) O > s► • > i - . do ► •w ♦ .:. -S. • ) 9 A td >l7a► •. .,• f .{ri EXHIBIT B DPl'1 99 11/166 REQUEST FOR REZONING FRO;'A Residential TOConnercial FOR THE FOL!_O'UING PURPOSE LEGAL DESCR IPT ION: 6629 Harriet Ave. S. VIE, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING OWNERS CF LAND.GITHIN 300 FEET OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, DO HEREBY CO%CUR IN THIS REZONING REQUEST, SIGNATURE OF OMERS ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION K.a w-%�/1k k /Fmay /7'Pd F"t.I �'/ N I A �� S D P17 99 1/1/66 REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM Resident TO_Coorl-Wr FOR THE FOLLOIING PURPOSE LEGAL DESCR IPT ION: 6629 Harriet Ave. S. 17E, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING OWNERS OF LAND WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED, DO HEREBY CCNCUR IN THIS REZONING REQUEST, G e ♦+ to ,♦ t < i t , t. t ♦., , t 6 It . y r r a s f4 ,.� 2 A j o 3 2ND PLAT —PLAT NO 45506 h A. A. ROG ERS 2ND AGON, — PLA f NO. 46311 iS ADM— PLAT NO 45550 20,,,E CARROLLS ADDN. —PLAT NO. 45170 iORES ON WOOD LK. —PLAT NO. 45740 6 - OAKLANE ADDN— PLAT NO. 45960 SHORES — PLAT NO. 45365 r7— MERIDIT HS ADDN. — PLAT N0. 45840 NS LYNDALE SHORES ON WD_ LK. —PLAT NO. 45635 WESTERN SURETY 8 ADJ. CO. ADDN. THE PIN 'LAT NO 46930 y� 14 PLAT N0, 4o9o5" SUNNYSIDE ACRES 2ND ADDN. —PLAT N0.46869 RICHLAND TERRACE— PLAT NO. 46290 ADDN. --PLAT NO. 45295 - �� ACADEMY TERRACE —PLAT NO. 44850 ADDN. -- PLAT N0. 45430 SUNLAND VISTA —PLAT NO. 46650 lo, SUNLAND VISTA 2ND ADDN. —PLAT N0. 466 D 0 o w '14470Z Zes. PRoPEW� lb 6r. VZe!=tJe�P WEST- _ - — 2 QS. 52, 0 Lf% � 15- t a' _ - 485 lKj GO b•~ III ~� -- Ea• - o ss 15, Aso -s - *O C cn Vh 5 5 150 i4y v. RC " .Q� Y� 3 le Z r- T �7�0 s °p 714 ��° s:• i4.7-4 �, ♦y�y� a-4iI410 7•. R•C.l t4, �6z Z k, 22 yo3 dolyT 5 r5 Co 24 2 rr5 149 2 r�3¢�� W o Q �a4$ 21 Kf Zo R Am c. oF p �_._ �as3��'�4 BOB o PL. _ v _ 000: 3 b° 1 . v .n M1aoo ii.�' 0 T 40 I 5- t 14 > 'g o ° 3 ut H S 344i 55 13o • .� . o Ao A W- 6i th r "iw.Jy _ Ica.♦ `Iii i a1r M F S ,.� 2 A j o ^ti h 20,,,E �� .. 6 - IS,tiS ' 'o r7— d � J r 1 y� 14 f ~ i3�w•o 1 a.' If jai - �� :; �' C 41 Go iZ r G' 4a r.4 r J V `00 r too a� 5 ✓®®: 2 r O ;� L � - cn 3 ST. z `Iii i a1r M F S 2 r" 4 A h 1� �� .. 3— s. ; f._ a d � J r 1 � t1•f'� f ~ x jai - �� 14. ,.. 2 lo, . 1114' ..r D 0 o I Go iZ r G' 4a r.4 r J V `00 r too a� 5 ✓®®: 2 r O ;� L � - cn 3 ST. z `Iii i a1r M F S r" 4 A h 13r 1 14 tI �� .. o� s. ; f._ a d � J r � t1•f'� f ~ x jai - �� 14. ,.. Ix lo, . 1114' ..r 0 o I `Iii i a1r M F S r" 4 A f -' e. f. S_ 13r 1 14 tI �� .. s. ; f._ a d � I � t1•f'� f ~ x jai - �� 14. ,.. Ix lo, . 1114' ..r 0 o 4t j e, < a 4 S. 4 i 4 A 4 goo W4 V E-s -Jand Use -Map -664t --664t EXHIBIT CS 0 Ln o �.Wfv GO r6o I b� 04 167,42 5. 00 00 DD:,Pz k stn A 0 C3 0 0 319 4? L�- N 1RCLE P-v_.4 � A; 4' *-A: ,C43 0 co:� 23 14. 9 Pi 4 • I 4 ve, D 0 Q o I Qe. ILW 4 :21) I Y 4 ST !Q 130 w 131 .6 Z4:t I I ------ 13L6 k 13z 0 zz i Y'R oloml 4 Zo 19 �a16_L IBC Z440 I A 5 10 IE sag! 4 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ,z NOTE. Corg COMMERCIAL S64r9T 4 goo if-l'2 ILW 4 :21) I Y 4 ST !Q 130 w 131 .6 Z4:t I I ------ 13L6 k 13z 0 zz i Y'R oloml 4 Zo 19 �a16_L IBC Z440 I A 5 10 IE sag! 4 4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ,z NOTE. Corg COMMERCIAL S64r9T 4 r` -VE S T Zoning Map _sr. ah EXHIBIT D '1.42 4 \ 13 10,, ; > i 135.62 ci 1! P y > '•�� 7F�7ite m/y '�c`� SS ^. > ° 'A ✓: 9 9 �o � � �, ray � r�. � t,n .i , i .(, jj � �ti�• '� S � �.�! �:, : . -tr u 450 ow r _ , i •c' (SOP `r _- _ __ - 3 _ .� 31 B7 tl1 .is. -w! - s \ •�C M VJ l .rSt Q'�C, a�) aj 10 W' S NSF E'`NLf1S t.�t • t r-- )3 7" L f j 23 LJ i n• ri °° a sh S it { r �, 21 J .�.•.+, 3t o Q C7 .. PL. r lb o is i y�v LL �. • i .�, { r '��, 31;5 ��'' 1, - �2 •` '�`� w7 � i „�,. I i��.,� ! .3 ;�t�a a,.ttioJ - i � >• �1.. � f'8 „jtiyJ ,�� sa, � ; �rU` _, . �-= —� '” t -�- �`u� <J' ; _.:yFi_ �• %' ~ �� i� i;�' _t 1 3f r• T. LA t�p "�fr.,j/ /,• �"' 2 •iJr R'• / ~r - (►V� ��: ui A !.`��,;yg>e�•y6 ?dr �. a.-� t' Ch 7 7' .: r {f ©�rO •�.'iSf G� J ^Ff era.. '; ,.r /'.:,`t ON J (, a� y� �g ` <e �� ' -i•�_� � �L'` _— j`r • �_._ �.0_/.. N �. ��. • ate. �dl c a , >' i , r ^ > y 4 r; r x. if r ' w l� -p O^ :-Ll GENERAL COMMERCIAL ill MULTIPLE RESIDENCE `` LIMITED BUSINESS - a - —� �U x _ r RAI, � F _ �JL rr� i %ti //i //U oven AVE F- .i•vcs evE. I —..vE. �°r' � „i1P _ � � I '� L—I •� ' �� nv xc .vE. _ nson avE. ExExsox AvE Exs (L avw..vE ee'.' evE ,IJ) eLOn— E. cenEiELO avE 1 "> - �— �.. Eill nom_ �L— CJ Ln � � Em ��U nD LL .vE 0 3D _ xcDLLE, .. DLx. x .vE ► `r _ ���, �_- !�, -�-� � U� ��) ; �Lx.Dx A�E. Nn* AiE. � J �— U—IT /U _� �_ UJ �� _ �h �- L:4�✓r��)l .41+ '. Cexl AvE. I r � uy. olxl D .iT'i. 4' 3^�J'.ki- VAnxex E•vE y i ,` Y } Y' -Iuws Pvc cD:DxDDS .vE. �—� F <n c•co PvE a �v"'i5�'.'SS9 —� ���b ,y �y EL10T "E. 1 -AE „�. P.E �=. �� � � _ ��C J'.�'L —FLU —� I�'��� •:b '� ie4�s'r'' h�: .D•x ev Inv -:c °t.. c -�4 ,hf” t�"* c<.c§ e,v^ -Ei K' SFr ,t �E F .FevD�y^ zon. PvE. Ex' ?rE{..', F ,rr h F 4 r:P!"` < U �— '~ z • E t't' r�ru€�'dts red n fr. ?r r F g�c z � ev CT,F1- h st c Ey. � FT r � °i-'• �pq F . E a �� �� t'�',!,+'�t � �sr c,� s��gx rt T���� x '� F�7�-r J tY e'"v�z r``�'i ct`n� •�4,t ht5.3.,�<. u� :fig': =i. s,Pxmsx avE. r "nx°t `�{r� r n r',�"'�r�T .4 rg r"n4rK.. \ s.exasx AvE z,s,`�`_rc: ncrEF.�Frak K�...��-- c,rr:,,,GS,_r_,.. hxT�n:h�•r'.c.�rF _rv��.�`€:,.�t�em s+.�i L�_�J m\ zs�. AVE. comprehensv development plan for the city of richfiel LAND USE: description density principal uses Combination of multiple dwellings, office, research Mixed Land Use High industrial, hotel, motel, institutional, and retail commercial Combination of office, institutional, light and \ Mixed Land Use High /Medium research oriented industrial, recall commercial, and multiple dwellings Combination of office, retail commercial, entertainment and Central Business eating establishments, small ® District High /Medium comparison shopping and service Mixed Land Use businesses, institutional, limited cultural, recreational facilities, and multiple dwellings Combination of single family dwellings, multiple dwellings, Mixed Land Use Medium townhouses, and neighborhood convenience commercial Industrial Medium Light and research oriented industrial uses. Multiple High Multiple units with related accessory uses. 0 Convenience Low Grocery, drug, hardware stores. Shopping Area Single family or two family Single Family LOW Units and accessory uses Residential compatible with single or two family units COMMUNITY FACILITIES: 4- - - - -- Public parks and open space 0 - - - -- Public schools Churches or church— related t� - - - -- facilities Other public, quasi- public, or - - - -- private institutional facilitie TRANSPORTATION: - - - -- Major arterial thoroughfare adopted by the city of richfield this 15th day of January ,fq 73 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 125 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Report from Advisory Board of Health The Richfield Advisory Board of Health has requested an opportunity to report to the city council on the Board's 1977 activities and programs. Mr. William Siemers, Advisory Board Chairman, will be present at the May 8, 1978 city council meeting to make this report. A copy of the Board's 1977 report is attached. Respectfully su ed, A44 fitt vao) Wayne S. Burggra a ff City Manager WS B/e j a cc: Environmental Health Director Administrative Assistant CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 124 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Presentation From Metropolitan Council Mr. Patrick Colbert, Metropolitan Council member representing Richfield, will be present at the May 8, 1978 city council meeting to present a check to the city from the Metropolitan Council. This check is for a grant awarded to Richfield to support revision of our overall development plan. We are required to review and amend our compre- hensive plan under provisions of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act passed by the Minnesota Legislature in 1976. Council Letter No. 296, dated September 26, 1977, provides additional information describing the require- ments for amending the comprehensive plan which the city must follow. A copy of that council letter is attached. Respectfully sub rffr tted, Wayne S. Burggraaff u J City Manager WSB /eja cc: Finance Director Planning & Redevelopment Director CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 296 Agenda September 26, 1977 Subject: Work Program for Amending the City -wide Comprehensive Plan; Authorization to Submit Grant Application In 1976, the Minnesota State Legislature passed the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, which provides that each community in the metropol- itan region must complete or amend an existing comprehensive plan to conform with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Richfield has until mac" July, 1980, to complete the amendments to the existing plan. In July, 1977, the Metropolitan Council transmitted a final systems statement to the City of Richfield. The purpose of the systems state - ment is to describe for each governmental unit in the region the metro- politan plans and facilities which affect them and which should be con - sidered in their comprehensive plan and capital improvement programs. The systems statement is divided into three parts. The first part contains projections of population and employment trends, and housing needs. The second part describes planned metropolitan facilities affecting Richfield; transportation, sewer, airport, and park systems. Part three lists any elements required by law that may be excluded from the comprehensive plan; however,-there are no exclusion in Rich- fields systems statement. Transit«.ttal of the systems statement started a 121 day period in which the City of Richfield could prepare a work program for amending our plea, to be 'eligible for a planning assistance grant. These grants were also appropriated by the State Legislature in 1976. The purpose of the grants is to assist local communities in the metropolitan area develop the comprehensive plans required under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The City of Richfield qualifies for $6,089. The approved grant application wort; program must be transmitted to the Metropolitan Council by October 21, 1977. The attached, "Planning with People" document is a draft work program for amending the Richfield comprehensive plan. In summary, the work program proposes extensive citizen participation, to help develop policies concerning the physical development of the community. These policies will be referred to by the Planning Commission and City Council when a decision has to be made on the physical develop- ment of the community. Council Letter No. 296 - •2 - September 26, 1977 s The comprehensive plan.content guidelines show what elements should be included in the Comprehensive Plan Policy Guide. A schedule and estimated cost and manpower needs are included along with Organization and Planning Relations. It is the opinion of ,':the staff that "Planning with People" is a realistic means for ;•- ;:` involving the people of Richfield in the planning process. Over the three year period, the cost of revising the Compre- hensive Plan is estimated to be $136,848, of which all but $19,200 is existing salary and overhead costs. The $19,200 represents the cost of consulting services for the plan revision process, a cost to the average Richfield resident of forty -eight cerits•over the three -year period. It must be remembered that the city is required by law to undertake this plan revision. The matter to be decided at this time is the process which we will use to accomplish this legislative mandate. `. PLANNING COMMISSION RECO_IMENDATION The Planning Commission at a special meeting on September 6, 1977, reviewed the preliminary draft of the work program. The Planning Commission recommended holding neighborhood meetings to allow the r residents to address issues most directly concerning their area. The Commission also discussed alternative ways to effectively organize the neighborhood meetings. These concerns have been included in the attached Work Program. i Although the Commission expressed concern of the ar:ount of staff time required and the cost of the project, compared to the small amount of funding available to the City, the Commission overall, felt the work program "Planning with People ",was a highly acceptable means for revising the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the staff, in which I con - cur, that the City Council approve the attached work program and authorize submission of an application -for. the Planning Assistance Grant. Respectfully ub;aitted , Wayne S. Bur, graa —, WSBllje City Manager cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director t CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Council Letter No. 123 Agenda May 8, 1978 Subject: Second Reading of Amendment to the Ordinance Code Relating to Street Vacations At the April 24, 1978 City council meeting, the council gave first reading approval to an amendment to Section 12.04 of the city ordinance code. This amendment relates to the process by which streets may be vacated and is in accordance with Section 12.06 of the city charter, which provides that the council may vacate any street by such procedure as is prescribed by ordinance. The proposed ordinance amendment includes the following major provisions: 1. Stipulates that street vacations are to be accomplished by ordinance, not by council resolution. This is in accordance with the city charter. 2. Provides that a street vacation is initiated by petition of the owners of at least one -half of the land abutting the street, rather than the majority of the landowners of land abutting the public street, as provided in the present ordinance. This petition only initiates the street vacation process and has no affect on the public hearing and other requirements which must be met before a street may be vacated. 3. Removes the language in the existing ordinance which dis- qualifies the city or other political subdivisions from petitioning as property owners to vacate a street. The current language might block the vacation of Grand Avenue between 65th and 66th Streets in the K -Mart project area, because the HRA will be the owner of all of the abutting properties. 4. Changes the procedure for obtaining easements in a vacated street. The present procedure provides that where easements' exist, for instance, a storm sewer lying under a street, the easement is terminated when the street is vacated and the city must obtain new easements from the abutting property owners. The attached ordinance amendment provides that the easements -may be reserved at the time the street is vacated, and it is no longer necessary for the easements to be renegotiated by the city. Council Letter No. 123 -2- May 8, 1978 After further consideration, the staff is also recommending the following additional changes be made a part of the amended ordinance: 1. That subdivision 2 be amended to include the word "prescribed". This will insure that all petitions have the proper format, and will also facilitate staff verification of the petition. 2. The word "any" should be deleted from subdivision 3, and the words "the prescribed" substituted. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment, including tHes& additional changes, is attached. It is recommended that the city council give second reading approval to this ordinance amendment at the May 8, 1978 city council meeting. It is also recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution which establishes an administrative mechanism for vacating streets in accordance with this ordinance. Respectfully sub itted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /e j a cc: City Attorney City Clerk Planning & Redevelopment Director Public Works Director AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XII, PART I, SECTION 12.04 OF THE RICHFIELD ORDINANCE CODE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter XII, Part I, Section 12.04 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield dealing with vacation of streets is hereby amended to read as follows: "12.04 STREET VACATION PROCEDURE. Subdivision 1:•• Charter Authority. This section is adopted pursuant to Section 12.06 of the City Charter. The proced- ures for the (creation) vacation of streets within the city shall be as delineated in the remaining subdivisions of this section and shall be applicable to all street vacation pro- ceedings in the city. Subd. 2. Council (Resolution) Authority; Petition. The council may by (resolution) ordinance vacate any street, alley, public grounds, or any part thereof, upon the prescribed half of the land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, or part thereof to be vacated. (Owners of abutting property shall not include the city nor any other political subdivision.) Subd. 3. Receipt of Petition; Notice of Hearing. The council shall be resolution ac now e ge receipt of (any) the prescribed petition which complies with the provisions of Subdivision 2. The resolution shall also set the date for a public hearing on the proposed street vacation. No such vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so and only after a hearing preceded by two weeks published and posted notice. Subd. 4. (Notice of Completion of Proceedings) Effect of Vaca- tion upon other Easements. (After a resolution of vacation is adopted the clerk shall prepare and present to the proper county officers a notice on completion of the proceedings, in accord- ance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.19.) The Ordinance vacating a public street or portion thereof shall specify, whether there are easements existing within the area of the street right of way, and the extent to which the vacation affects the authoritv of any person, corporation or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and se%oer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants, thereupon or thereunder,, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such street or por- tion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace or otherwise attend thereto. Subd. 5. Petition -Fee. The petition for vacation of any street, alley, public grounds or parks thereof shall be accompanied by the fee provided in Appendix D of this code. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 1978 a Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas Moran,,City Clerk a t4 <,r S(.. r��di♦( a <�� 'l+ -. fiJ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE STREET, ALLEY AND PUBLIC GROUND VACATION PROCESS WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has the power to vacate street, alleys and public grounds, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield has by ordinance set up the procedure for vacating streets, alleys and public grounds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT'RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richfield hereby adopts the following administrative process for vacating streets, alleys, and public grounds: S T R E E T V A C A T I O N P R O C E S S 1. Applicant obtains presecribed petition from Inspection Department. 2. Petition signed by the owners of 50 per cent or more of the land abutting on the street, alley, or public grounds to be vacated. 3. Petition returned to Inspection Department and fee paid. 4. Petition validated by Inspection Department. 5. Petition forwarded to Planning Department for staff review. 6. Petition sent to Public Works Department and Public Safety Department and public utilities for comment. 7. Planning Department completes staff review. 8. City Council acknowledges receipt of petition, gives first reading and schedules public hearing. 9. Notice of public hearing posted and published by Planning Department, two weeks prior to date of hearing. 10. City Attorney draws up ordinance. 11. Public hearing and council action. 12. Ordinance published. 13. Thirty -day waiting period. 14. Notice of street vacation sent to County Registrar of Deeds and Titles, County Public Works Department, public utilities, city public works and city finance departments. 15. Street is vacated. ..a .t f..i ♦v .�I• ♦•� ,47 << .. Sf.t r 144• f •iti s ♦♦•t '�♦ . . f t -2 r Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of , 1978- Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J.• Moran, City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 122 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Barricades for Block Party Mr. and Mrs. Gene Illg, 6909 4th Avenue, have requested that both sides of the 6900 block of 4th Avenue be barricaded for purposes of holding a block party of Monday, July 3, 1978. Mrs. Hurley, 6414 17th Avenue, has also requested that 17th Avenue between 64th and 65th Streets be barricaded on Sunday, June 4th from the hours of 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of holding a block graduation party. It is recommended that approval be granted for these barricades with the stipulation that the city erect the barricades and that they be erected in such a way as to permit ingress and egress of emergency vehicles should this be necessary during the time of the block parties. Respectfully s mitted, S. 8 1 . Wayne S. Burggraa City Manager WSB /e j a cc: Public Works Director Public Safety Director �11 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO CA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 121 Agenda May 8, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Setting Date for Candidates To File for Office The 1978 legislature passed a bill requiring that municipalities publish • notice stating the first and last days on which affidavits of candidacy for • municipal election may be filed. This notice is required to be published two weeks before the first date to file affidavits. The city charter does not stipulate when a candidate may file for office, although the charter does require that a candidate for office must file with the city clerk two weeks before the municipal primary election. .The city attorney has prepared an ordinance amendment to establish the earliest date when a nomination petition for office may be filed. The proposed amendment stipulates that a candidate may not file for office before July 1 of each year, in accordance with charter provisions, that such filing must be with the city clerk at least two weeks before the municipal primary election. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is recommended that the council give first reading consideration to this ordinance amendment at the May 8, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully sub itted, A) 4W S. W1 Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: City Attorney City Clerk A AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER II, PART V OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD City of Richfield does ordain: 1. Chapter II, Part V, of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield relating to municipal elections is hereby amended-by adding after Section 2.66 thereof the following new section: "2.67 FILING DATES - NOMINATION PETITIONS Petitions nominating candidates for elective office, provided for in the City Charter, may not be filed before July 1 of the year in which the election is to be held. Any such nominating petitions must be filed with the City Clerk at least two weeks before the municipal primary election provided in Section 4.02 of the City Charter." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , 1978. ATTEST: Thomas Moran, City C1er oren L. Law, Mayor