05-22-78 agenda17
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 155
Agenda May 22, 1978
Subject: Approval of 1978 -1979 Agreement with Richfield
Police Supervisors Association
The purpose of this council letter is to submit for city council consideration
and action a new 1978 -1979 agreement which has been negotiated between the
City of Richfield and the Richfield Police Supervisors Association. Implementation
is subject to consideration and approval by the city council.
The Richfield Police Supervisors Association represents a total of eight
positions in the city service. These positions include six sergeants, one lieutenant,
and one captain.
The significant changes in the agreement are summarized in this council
letter. All of these changes relate to 1978. The agreement will remain unchanged
in 1979 except for salary adjustrrents and employer insurance premium contributions
which are premitted to be subjects of negotiation for that year.
A summary of the significant contract changes are as follows:
1. Sergeants may have the option of being compensated for overtime
through compensatory time off at the rate of time and one half up
to a maximum amount of sixty -four hours. Prior to 1978 all overtime
had to be paid in cash at the rate of time and one half of the hourly
rate of pay. Lieutenants and captains do not receive either overtime
or compensatory time for extra hours worked.
2. The educational incentive payment is changed to increase the per
credit payment from forty -five cents to fifty cents and from a maximum
of $972 to $1,080 per year. This change is consistent with other
police supervisory contracts in the area.
Council Letter No. 155 -2- May 22, 1978
3. The maximum clothing allowance was increased from $200 to
$215 per year which again is consistent with other police
supervisory contracts.
4. The accumulation of sick leave at the rate of eight hours per month
was increased from a maximum of 800 hours to 960 hours which is
consistent with other police supervisory contracts..
5. A new three percent longevity step was added. We strongly disagree
in concept with this item. However, it was very important to the
bargaining unit and affects only four individuals. As you know, the
contract contains a phase out provision for longevity so it is a small
cost item which cannot be extended to other individuals in the future.
6. The contract contains a severance payprovision which provides for a
payment of one -third of accumulated sick leave to a maximum of 400
hours upon honorable termination for any employee with at least ten
years of continuous service. Again, this was an item with which we
strongly disagreed and which we attempted to keep out of the contract.
On the other hand, this was a high priority item for the bargaining unit
and had we not agreed, it would have caused the bargaining unit to seek
binding arbitration. Our chances in binding arbitration of successfully
opposing this benefit would not be good since it is one currently received
by most police in the Twin City area; and, also, by Local 1215 bargaining
unit members in Richfield as a result of the 1976 firefighter arbitration
case.
7. For the first .time, a maximum overall dollar limit has been negotiated
for health insurance premium contributions. Prior to 1978, the police
supervisors contract contained a maximum for dependent premium con -
tribution, but provided for 100 percent of the single premiums no matter
what the cost. The maximum amount for 1978 is $71 per month.
8. The salary increase for the police sergeants, lieutenant and captain
is 7.85 percent which amounts to a top police sergeant pay rate of
$1,759 per month. Under this agreement the top step for lieutenant is
$1,902 per month and the top step for captain is $2,056 per month.
These rates of pay are consistent with those of other communities that
have settled with their police supervisory groups for 1978.
Council Letter No. 155 -3- May 22, 1978
It is recommended that the city council adopt the following two resolutions:
1. A resolution authorizing a transfer of $14,650 from the contingency
fund to cover the 1978 cost of implementing this contract.
2. A resolution approving this agreement for the years 1978/79.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Finance Director
Personnel Director
Public Safety Director
r
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND THE RICHFIELD POLICE
SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION FOR THE YEARS 1978 -1979
WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Richfield Police Supervisors Assoc-
iation have reached a complete understanding concerning rates of pay, hours
and other conditions of employment for the years 1978 and 1979, and
WHEREAS, the Personnel Ordinance requires that contracts between the
City and the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate bargaining
unit shall be implemented by council resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Richfield does hereby approve the Agreement between the City of Richfield and
the Richfield Police Supervisors Association for the years 1978 and 1979 and
orders the provisions of this Agreement to be implemented effective January 1,
1978.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd day of
May, 1978.
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
Loren L. Law Mayor
f
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF
APPROPRIATIONS FROM THE 1978 CONTINGENCY
ACCOUNT TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5770 appropriated funds for each department of
the City for the year 1978; and
WHEREAS, contingency appropriation was made in the General Fund for
various purposes, including the 1978 salary adjustments and the related fringe
benefit contributions, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. approved the Agreement between the City
of Richfield and the Richfield Police Supervisors Association for the year 1978-
1979 which provides for a pay plan and certain supplemental wage benefits; and
WHEREAS, it is hereby determined necessary to adjust the 1978 budget
appropriation by $14,650 to reflect adjustments required by this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that the sum of $14,650 be transferred from the contingency appropri-
ation of the General Fund to the Public Safety Department.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd day of
May, 1978.
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran
City Clerk
Loren L. Law Mayor
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 154
Agenda May 22, 1978
Subject: Information Concerning Implementation of the Fire
Protection Study Committee Report
The purpose of this council letter is to provide information concerning
implementation of the Fire Protection Study Committee report. This information
was requested by the city council at the April 24, 1978 city council meeting.
Background Information
On March 27, 1978 the Fire Protection Study Committee presented its report
to the city council. The report was received by the city council at that meeting
for review and study. The following actions have occurred at the March 27, 1978
city council and subsequent council meetings:
March 27, 1978: The city council scheduled discussion of the report
at the April 10 and April 24, 1978 city council .meetings. The city
manager was requested to prepare a tentative impleinantation plan based
on the report recommendations.
April 10, 1978: The public safety director and city manager recommended
that the Fire Protection Study Committee report be approved and implemented
as an integral set of proposals to improve fire division services. A tenta-
tive implementation plan was submitted to the city council.
The recommendations contained in the Fire Protection Study Committee
report were approved in concept by the city council. Further discussion
of the proposed implementation plan was scheduled for the April 24, 1978
city council meeting.
April 24, 1978: The city council considered implementation of the
committee report, but deferred a final decision pending receipt of additional
information on several items including compensation and position require-
ments for volunteers.
Council Letter No. 154 -2- May 22, 1978
The city council waived the position appointment moratorium to
permit the civil service commission to initiate recruitment and
selection procedures for two firefighter positions so that these
appointments could be made later in the year when the positions
become vacant.
The city council meeting of May 22, 1978 was established as the
date when the city council would make a final decision on implem-
entation of the Fire Protection Study Committee recommendations.
Information Requested by City Council
At the April 24, 1978 city council meeting, council members requested several
additional pieces of information concerning implementation of the recommendations
contained in the report prepared by the citizen's committee. These requests which
related primarily to establishment of a group of volunteers to supplement the pro-
vision of fire services in Richfield are as follows:
1. Request: The city council asked the civil service commission
to provide information on what requirements would be established
for a volunteer position.
Response
-- The civil service commission did meet in response to
the request of the city council for the purpose of con-
sidering this matter.
-- Information on this request is contained in a memorandum
from the public safety director attached hereto and identified
as Exhibit A.
2. Request: The city council asked whether it would be possible to
provide effective fire services through part -time or temporary em-
ployment of off -duty fire personnel from other municipal fire services.
Response
-- Inasmuch as this is a matter regulated by the civil service
commission, the commission considered this request at its
recent meeting.
-- It was determined that a statutory provision limiting such
employment to 30 calendar days would make this alternative
almost impossible to use and undesirable particularly from
the standpoint of continuity of fire services.
-- More detailed information on this matter is included in
Exhibit A.
Council Letter No. 154 -3- May 22, 1978
3. Request: The city council inquired as to when the recruitment
and selection procedures could be implemented; thereby making
possible the appointment of two full time firefighters when the
positions become vacant.
Response
-- The civil service commission has initiated the process
to create a certified list from which such appointments
can be made. That list should be available by August
14, 1978.
-- Following the establishment of a certified list, final
interviews, medicals, psychologicals, and such other
matters as resignation notice periods, should make it
possible to start these two new personnel no later than
mid - September, 1978.
-- More detailed information on this item is contained in
Exhibit A.
4. Request: The city council asked for specific information on how
many volunteers would be appointed and when the appointments
would be effective.
Response
-- Fifteen volunteers would be appointed to start mid - October,
1978.
-- Ten additional volunteers would be appointed to start in
March, 1979.
-- The total number of volunteers would be limited to 25 for
the immediate future to determine whether this number of
volunteers is appropriate or whether the number should be
decreased or increased.
5. Request: The city council inquired as to whether the city could
anticipate a high number of potential applicants if a volunteer
program is established.
Response
-- It was the conclusion of the Fire Protection Study
Committee after reviewing other volunteer programs, that
there was no reason to believe an adequate number of in-
dividuals would not be interested and available for a
similar program in Richfield.
Council Letter No. 154 -4- May 22, 1978
-- Volunteer fire service operations in a vast majority
of suburban municipalities in the Twin City area
have had successful results in meeting staffing needs.
-- The volunteer emergency services division in the
Richfield Public Safety Department has historically
experienced a high level of interest which. we believe
is indicative of a similar response for a group of
volunteers in the fire service.
-- Both the city manager and public safety director have
already been contacted by citizens that have expressed
an interest in a potential volunteer program.
6. Request: The city council asked for information on compensation for
volunteers and information on what the proposed volunteer program
would cost.
Response
-- Exhibit B shows estimated annual cost information for a
volunteer position.
-- Exhibit C is a resolution which provides for the establishment
of compensation for volunteers, reflecting cost information
shown in Exhibit B.
-- Exhibit D shows estimated annual costs projected for the
volunteer program for 1978, 1979 and 1980.
7. Request: The city council inquired as to how the west side fire station
would be operated this year and in the future with a volunteer program.
Response
-- A fire company is scheduled to operate from the west side
fire station on a continuing basis throughout the balance of
1978. (This would be continued in the future; however, at
the present time, specific crew assignment schedules are
only made through December, 1978).
-- Use of the west side station would be further enhanced by
the establishment of the volunteer program, since larger
numbers of individuals would operate out of this station.
Council Letter No. 154 -5- May 22, 1978
Recommendations
On April 10, 1978 the city council did approve,' in concept, the recommenda-
tions contained in the Fire Protection Study Committee report. It is recommended
that the following additional actions be taken to enable the city staff to begin
implementing the report recommendations:
1. Approve the proposed implementation plan which is attached and
identified as Exhibit E. This implementation plan, while subject
to change in terms of detail, does nevertheless provide a general
outline of the work program and priorities for proceeding to implement
the recommendations contained in the report.
2. Authorize the appointment of a total of 25 volunteer firefighters
with 15 appointments to be made initially in October, 1978 and
the remaining ten appointments to be made initially in March, 1979.
3. Adopt the compensation resolution for volunteer firefighters which
is attached hereto and identified as Exhibit C.
Respectfully submitted,
&W,<E�.7t T W , 1)
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Safety Director
Finance Director
EXHIBIT A
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: May 15, 1978
To: Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
From: Thomas A. Morgan, Jr.
Director of Public Safety
Subject: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF
"VOLUNTEER" FIREFIGHTER POSITIONS
At the city council meeting on April 24, 1978, the council asked for some
additional information with regard to the potential implementation of the
recommendations of the Fire Protection Study Committee. In particular,
the council wished to have information regarding the potential selection
standards for "volunteer" fire fighting personnel. Additionally, the
council questioned whether the city could hire temporary off -duty fire-
fighters from other communities to fill some of the existing firefighter
vacancies in Richfield during the summer months. Civil Service Commissioner
W. Robert Gordon was present at the April 24th council meeting and was asked
by the council to comment on these two issues. Commissioner Gordon indicated
that he was unprepared to comment at that time, but stated that the commission
would shortly be holding a meeting and would consider these matters at that
time. On Friday-,May 5-,--1978-,—the -P-ol i c-"nd —N -re Civi l Servi -ce Commission
did meet and did conduct a preliminary discussion of the "volunteer" fire
fighting personnel issue. Additionally, the commission also considered the
potential for utilizing temporary appointments of off -duty firefighters
from other communities to fill some of the existing Richfield firefighter
vacancies during the summer months.
In discussing the matter of "volunteer" fire fighting personnel, it was
the opinion of the commission that a final determination of the selection
standards for these employees was perhaps premature. In discussing this
matter, it was the opinion of the commission that significant legal re-
search and amendments to the existing Rules and Regulations of the Police
and Fire Civil Service Commission would be necessary. The commission was
in agreement with the opinion of the city attorney that "volunteer" fire
fighting personnel would become members of a new unclassified position
within the Civil Service structure. Basically, this would mean that the
commission would approve the basic qualifications required and develop
lists, but appointments could be made by the city appointing officer of
any qualified candidate regardless of where he may place on the list.
This would be particularly valuable in selecting "volunteer" firefighters
since it would be critical to have flexibility to choose on the basis of
such considerations as location of residents and hours of availability.
However, this process would have to be clarified with rules developed by
the city attorney's office for the implementation of this process.
Memorandum - Wayne S. Burggraaff
May 15, 1978
Page Two
In discussing the basic minimal qualifications of "volunteer" fire fighting
personnel, the Civil Service Commission was of the opinion that the qualifi-
cations should be similar to those for our full -time fire fighting personnel.
For your information, the current minimum qualifications required of fire
fighter applicants are as follows:
Age: 21 to 35 years of age.
Educational: High school graduate or GED equivalent.
Medical: Excellent general health. Must pass comprehensive
medical examination and comprehensive psychological
evaluation.
Physical Agility: Must pass a physical agility test designed to
measure coordination and strength as appropriate
to the duties to be performed.
Residence: Upon acceptance of permanent appointment, the ap-
pointee to the Fire Division shall, within one
year, become a resident within the geographical
area bounded on the North by Highway 12, on the
East by the Mississippi River, on the South by the
Minnesota River, and on the West by Highway 101.
Drivers License: Must have, or be qualified to obtain, a valid
Minnesota Class A drivers license. The candidate
must have obtained such a license prior to the
time of appointment.
EMT Certification: Upon acceptance of permanent appointment, the ap-
pointee must have a current and valid certification
as an Emergency Medical Technician. The candidate
need not have yet received this certification at
the time the application for this position is sub-
mitted.
The commission did discuss dropping the minimum entry age from twenty -one
which is presently required for full -time personnel to twenty for the "volunteer"
personnel. The commission felt that this would provide a little broader base
for initial recruitment, as well as providing a higher potential of finding
applicants with flexible schedules. The commission also discussed a more re-
strictive residency requirement which would essentially provide that a candidate
reside within the corporate limits of the City of Richfield. It was the feeling
of the commission that this was critical on our initial recruitment effort to
assure the kind of rapid fire response we would expect from a "volunteer" force.
Finally, during the commission's discussion on this matter, it appeared to be
the opinion of the commissioners that the new medical training requirement of
EMT Certification for full -time firefighters would not be necessary for the
"volunteers" since they would be mainly involved in fire suppression activities.
T
Memorandum - Wayne S. Burggraaff
May 15, 1978
Page Three
The Civil Service Commission is prepared to move ahead with the necessary
process to provide for the appropriate amendments to their Rules and Regu-
lations to accomodate "volunteer" fire fighting personnel. However, since
this action would involve some major amendments to the Rules and Regulations,
the commission has decided to withhold any actual implementation of this pro-
posal until such time as the city council makes a final decision with regard
to authorizing the appointment of "volunteer" firefighters.
The Civil Service Commission did obtain a city attorney's opinion on the
suggested use of temporary personnel to fill firefighter vacancies during
the summer months. Based on information provided by the city attorney's
office, it was the opinion of the Civil Service Commission that this approach
would not be practical because of the legal restrictions placed upon the ap-
pointment of temporary personnel by the state civil service statues.
Minnesota State Statute 420.07 (8), which covers the appointment of temporary
personnel to civil service positions states:
"Temporary employment without examination, with the consent
in each case of the commission, in cases of emergency, but
no such temporary employment shall continue more than thirty
days nor shall successive temporary employment be permitted
for the same position."
Because of the thirty day limitation placed on temporary appointments by the
state statutory provision, and particularly in view of the fact that such ap-
pointments can be made for only one thirty day period and not successive
periods, the commission felt that this technique would do little to alleviate
the potential manpower shortages during the summer months. It would be dif-
ficult to determine just which thirty day period during the summer might be
most critical since the major uncontrollable personnel shortage centers around
sick leave.
In a related matter the city council, at their April 24th meeting, lifted
the moratorium on the filling of vacancies and authorized the appointment of
two firefighters. At the May 5th Civil Service Commission Meeting, the com-
mission approved the selection standards and examination plan to develop a
list of candidates from which such appointments may be made. Advertising
for this position started on May 14th. While the selection process is com-
plicated because of the large number of candidates who generally apply for
this position, the commission's plan calls for the process to be completed
and the list certified on August 14, 1978.
I believe that the Civil Service Commission has now acted on all of the re-
quests that were raised by the council on April 24th. The commission has
initiated some of the legal research necessary to provide the required amend-
ments to their Rules and Regulations to accomodate "volunteer" fire fighting
personnel. The commission is prepared to move ahead and take formal action
�y
F
Memorandum - Wayne S. Burggraaff
May 15, 1978
Page Four
with regard to this matter at such time as they are authorized to do so
by the city council. If there are any other issues that should be addres-
sed regarding this matter, please let me know; and I will attempt to re-
solve them as rapidly as possible so that a final decision can be reached.
Respectfully submitted,
00600""
Thomas A. Morgan, Jr.
Director of Public Safety
TAM / go
cc: Civil Service Commission
EXHIBIT B
Notes
* Based on minimum current "volunteer firefighter" statutory pension provision
required by State Statute 424.17.
** Based on actual Brooklyn Center volunteer pension program which is typical
of volunteer pensions in the metropolitan area.
Estimated Annual Cost
for a Volunteer Firefighter
(Based on 1976 Fire Suppression
Experience)
Cost With
Cost With Typical
General Law
Special Law
Pension
Pension
Salary:
Flat rate of $5.00 per hour
138 Hours Fire Suppression Activity
104 Hours Training Activity
242 Hours at $5.00 per Hour
$1,210
$1,210
Workmen's
Compensation Insurance
79
79
Group Life
Insurance Benefit ($5,000)
14
14
Pension
Benefit
100*
875 **
Uniform
and Equipment Costs
150
150
Estimated Annual Cost, per "volunteer"
$1,553
$2,328
Notes
* Based on minimum current "volunteer firefighter" statutory pension provision
required by State Statute 424.17.
** Based on actual Brooklyn Center volunteer pension program which is typical
of volunteer pensions in the metropolitan area.
EXHIBIT C
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION
FOR VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS
WHEREAS, Section 2.33 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
provides that the City Council shall adopt by resolution compensation
provisions for all categories of city personnel, and
WHEREAS, Section 2.33 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield
provides that the City Manager shall be responsible for administering such
compensation provisions, and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended compensation provisions for
the position of Volunteer Fire Fighter.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby
does establish the following compensation provisions for the position
of Volunteer Fire Fighter:
1. An hourly rate of pay of $5.00 per hour for all service
including training and fire suppression activities
2. Workmen's Compensation Insurance
3. Term Life Insurance Group Policy ($5,000) provided to city
employees through Hennepin County Joint Purchasing Organization
4. Pension benefits prescribed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 424.17
5. Annual allowance of $150 for personal uniform and equipment
replacement
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd day
of May, 1978.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
EXHIBIT D
1978 - 1979 -1980
Estimated Annual Cost Comparison
of Proposed 25 Member Volunteer Program
with Appointment of Four Full Time Firefighters
1978 1979
Twenty -Five Member Volunteer Program $19,350 $ 55,000
Four Full Time Appointments $30,000 $102,000
The preceeding estimates were based on the following assumptions:
1. Four full time appointments made 9- 18 -78.
2. Fifteen volunteer appointments made 10 -2 -78.
Ten volunteer appointments made 3 -5 -79.
•:E
$ 58,200
$108,000
3. A cost of $900 to cover recruitment, selection, appointment
and initial outfitting expenses for each new volunteer and
$500 for similar costs for a full time person since enough
radio pagers are already available for full time personnel.
4. A total annual cost for a full time firefighter of $24,000
in 1978, $25,500 in 1979 and $27,000 in 1980.
5. Use of annual cost figures for volunteers as shown in
Exhibit B with the special pension law alternative be-
coming effective 7 -1 -79.
r
EXHIBIT I
TENTATIVE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Organizing and Staffing Activities
1. Establishment of a "volunteer" fire support organization to
supplement existing personnel. Initially twenty -five volunteer
members are proposed to be phased in over a period of twelve to
fifteen months. Approximately one -half of these individuals would
be appointed during 1978.
2. Initiate an effort to explore and experiment with limited work schedule
revisions and objectives, together with possible reorganization of
positions and functions- This endeavor would occur during the summer
_ and fall of 1978 with any significant changes tentatively scheduled for
implementation in late 1978 or early 1979.
Facilities, Equipment, and Operation
1. Over the past few years, the city has gradually been able to add fire
vehicles to the central garage revolving replacement fund. Of the three
remaining vehicles which are not yet assigned to that fund, one will be
added in July, 1978, one will be traded or sold in 1979 and an effort will
be made to add the last vehicle to the fund before the end of 1979.
2. Recommendations concerning use of mutual aid, joint station operation
with Edina and medical emergency services all involve some degree of
cooperation and work with other jurisdictions. These efforts will be
pursued as possible during the twenty month implementation period.
Firefighter Training Activities
1. Appointment of "volunteer" personnel will require a number of sub-
stantial changes in the fire division training program, especially as it
relates to new volunteer personnel and coordinated work activities for
volunteers and full -time personnel.
2. A comprehensive review of in- service training will be conducted in 1979.
t
t
TENTATIVE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (Contd.)
Fire Prevention Activities
1. Voluntary residential home fire prevention inspections can be offered
this spring as part of the city -wide spring cleanup program. The
commercial inspection program will be reviewed for possible improvements
later this year.
2; A bill relating to a state fire prevention code and its application to
municipalities was passed by both houses of the legislature this year .
This new legislation will be reviewed to determine its application to
Richfield and possible impact on our code enforcement programs.
3. More emphasis will be given to prevention activities during the second
half of 1979 after the new volunteer fire support organization has been
well established.
9!
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 153
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Acquisition of City -Owned Property by the HRA
On December 20, 1977 the HRA authorized its Executive Director to
purchase part of the city owned Lyndale Avenue liquor store property described
as the north portion of Tract C, Registered Land Survey 1131. The HRA is
acquiring this property and that of the car wash immediately to the north for
re -sale to Woodlake Investment Company. Woodlake Investment Company is
proposing to build a 10,000 square foot building on the property to house the
Wood Lake Cleaners and the Wood Lake Veterinary Hospital. The HRA is
proposing to purchase the property from the city for $4.25 per square foot, or a
total of $77, 307.50 for the entire parcel.
The city council must adopt a transitory ordinance providing for sale of this
parcel before the transaction may be completed. The city attorney is preparing
a transitory ordinance which will be available for council review at the May 22,
1978 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
City Attorney
Liquor Store Manager
- � J
6.40
p= 13°4045
,,• I I -77.92 —
/ ,SAN SEWER 1 � 30
8
A
430 \236
N ZZg D
ti
i
v J
(D -k—
,o 52 EPSE.
1,PNOi P'E� / W 11 J
W+
315.93
N28008'41 W
ms`s
(D
o (D a
r CC
i _
d � �
aT� r
C V .�.+
C O
N .9.0
I
1
I
I
1
I
rol-
1
I
1
1
1
1
i !-
�r
,f 1
v
w
N 0
OD-d
N
IZ
1 �r�
V
30 30
�^J
L 1 '-
��
I'
30
_I
I
I Lo
w
3
w
vu)
►d
I 0
F-'
IU
tr
Q
U;
j<
�J
..J
LLI
Or
M�
- -- - --
r PM D
NN
i�N
O
I \ ro.
N
I
Z
d:
1 LL
. -J
r i
I
A
430 \236
N ZZg D
ti
i
v J
(D -k—
,o 52 EPSE.
1,PNOi P'E� / W 11 J
W+
315.93
N28008'41 W
ms`s
(D
o (D a
r CC
i _
d � �
aT� r
C V .�.+
C O
N .9.0
I
1
I
I
1
I
rol-
1
I
1
1
1
1
i !-
�r
,f 1
v
w
N 0
OD-d
N
IZ
1 �r�
V
30 30
�^J
L 1 '-
��
I'
30
_I
I
I Lo
w
3
w
vu)
►d
I 0
F-'
IU
tr
Q
U;
j<
�J
..J
.dl+
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 152
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Restricting Parking in Parking Areas
On Public Property
On several occasions in past years, the city has received complaints
from residents in the area of the Cedar Avenue and Lyndale Avenue liquor stores
regarding trucks parking in the lots with their motors running during evening
hours. These vehicles have been using the liquor store parking lots on an
unauthorized basis, for purposes unrelated to the liquor store business. Although
we have been able to remove the vehicles with the cooperation of the owners, the
city attorney has developed a proposed ordinance amendment which would strengthen
the city's authority to remove any unauthorized vehicles from parking on city
property.
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. This ordinance
amendment provides that the council may adopt a resolution specifying times
during which parking on public property is prohibited.
It is recommended that the city council give first reading consideration
to this ordinance amendment at the May 22, 1978 city council meeting. The
council might also wish to discuss the types of restrictions which it may wish
to implement so that the staff and attorney may draft a resolution establishing
such parking prohibitions for council review at the time the council gives
second reading consideration to this ordinance amendment.
Respectfully sub tted,
all
Cv �.
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
cc: Public Safety Director
Public Works Director
City Clerk
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER IX,
SECTION 9.03 OF THE ORDINANCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter IX, Section 9.03 regulating parking and stopping
is hereby amended by amending paragraph 19 thereof to read
as follows:
(19) On any public property, including parks,
playgrounds and school grounds [except upon
areas thereon improved and marked for parking) and
including marked and improved parking areas
on public property during times when parking
on such parking areas is prohibited by council
resolution. _
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this _ day of , 1978.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 151
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
cm
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Proposed Ordinance Providing for Charter Amendment
On Code of Ethics
Attached hereto you will find a proposed transitory ordinance which
would amend the city charter with respect to code of ethics provisions. Also
attached is a copy of the letter of transmittal from john Degnan, a member of
the charter commission.
Final adoption of these proposed provisions by ordinance amendment
would require a favorable vote by all members of the city council.
WSB /eja
cc: City Attorney
Respectfully sub itted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff,
City Manager
S
RICHARDS, MONTGOMERY, COBB BASSFORD, P. A.
LAWYERS
FRED B. SNYDER
EDWARD C. GALE
FRANK A. JANES
NATHAN A. COBB -
0ECEASED 612 -340-8950
1430 DAIN TOWER
BERGMANN RICHARDS MINNEAPOLIS
EDMUND T. MONTGOMERY MINNESOTA 5540 2
PAUL L. SPOONER, JR.
CHARLES A. BASSFORD
MELVIN D. HECKT
GREER E.LOCKHART
LYNN G. TRUESDELL L[
JEROME C. BRIGGS
L. H. MAY, JR.
JOHN M. DEGNAN
KEVIN P. KEENAN
' REBECCA L. MOOS
May 15, 1978 -
City Council of Richfield
Richfield City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Re: Richfield Charter Amendment
Code of Ethics
Gentlemen:
Enclosed you will find the Richfield Charter Amendment
incorporating a Code of Ethics into the Charter which was
discussed and asked by the Richfield Charter Commission on
May 11, 1978. We hereby recommend to you the enactment of
this provision.
Please notify us when this will be considered by the
City Council and we will be happy to have representatives
from the Charter Commission present to discuss this provision.
We thank you for your consideration in this regard.
JMD:cj
enclosure
r
u ; "Ay Y r, ; ^; 8
Transitory Ordinance P:o.
CHARTER AMENDMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 4
A14 ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY
CHARTER OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
The City Charter of the City of Richfield, adopted
November 3, 1964, as subsequently amended, is hereby
amended in the following respects:
(1) Section 12.03 thereof, entitled "City Officers
not to be Interested in Contracts" is hereby deleted.
(2) Chapter 12, entitled "Miscellaneous and Transitory
Provisions" is hereby renumbered Chapter 13. Sections 12.01,
12.02, 12.04, 12.05, 12.06, 12.07, 12.08, 12.09, 12.10, 12.11,
12.12 and 12.13 are hereby renumbered 13.01, 13.02, 13.03, 13.04,
13.05, 13.06, 13.07, 13.08, 13.09, 13.10, 13.11 and 13.12
respectively.
(3) A new Chapter 12 shall be added to the City Charter,
after Chapter 11 thereof_, providing as follows:
"CHAPTER 12
Code of Ethics
Sec. 12.01. The term 'public official' shall include all
elected officials, the city manager, and all members of boards
or commissions, as are authorized under this Charter.
Sec. 12.02. No public official shall misuse such position to
secure special privileges or exemptions for such person or_ any
other person.
Sec. 12.03. No public official shall directly or indirectly
receive or agree to receive, any compensation, gift, reward or
gratuity in payment for the performance of his or her official
duties except as may be provided by law.
Sec. 12.04. No public_ official shall enter into any contract
with the City which is prohibited by law. Any public official who
has a proprietary interest in an entity doing business with the
City shall make known that interest in writing to the City Council
and the City Clerk.
Sec. 12.05. Any public official- who -in the discharge of
said official's duties would be required to take an action or make
a decision which would substantially affect such official's
financial interests or those of a business with which such official
is associated, unless the effect on such official
is no greater than on any other citizens or other members of
such official's business classification, profession, or
occupation, shall take the following actions:
a. A written statement shall be prepared which will
include the name, address, office held, action
presenting the potential conflict of interest, the
nature of the financial interest, the person notified
of the potential conflict of interest, the official's
signature and the date;
b. Said person shall deliver copies of the statement
to the City Clerk and to the official's immediate
superior, if any;
C. if a potential conflict presents itself and
there is insufficient time to comply with the provisions
of clauses "a" and "b" of this section the public
official shall verbally inform the City Clerk and the
official's superior of the potential conflict. The
official shall then file a written statement with the
City Clerk within one week after the potential conflict
presents itself which statement shall state the reason
for the delay.
Sec. 12.06. Any intentional failure to file such statement
or any intentional filing of a false written or verbal statement
or any intentional omission of any required information in any
required statement shall be unlawful and shall be referred by
the City Clerk or the public official's immediate superior
to the City Attorney for appropriate action."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, this day of 1978.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Moran, City Cler
n
w
160
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 150
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Barricades for Block Party
Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Ammann, 7009 Upton Avenue South, have requested that
Upton Avenue be blocked off from 70th Street to 70 1/2 Street for purposes of
holding a block party on Saturday, June 10, 1978 from the hours of 12 :00 noon
to 1:00 A.M. .
It is recommended that approval be granted for these barricades with the
stipulation that the city erect the barricades and that they be erected in such
a way as to permit_ ingress and egress of emergency vehicles should this be
necessary during the time of the block party.
WSB /jef
cc: Public Works Director
Public Safety Director
Respectfully sub tted,
K)%4 � -
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 149
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Moratorium on the Filling of Position Vacancy
During the 1977 budget hearings, the city council established a
moratorium on the filling of full time vacancies. This letter is to request
that the moratorium be lifted to permit the filling of the following full time
position:
Water Maintenance Man - -This vacancy is created by the transfer of
the incumbent to a vacant Park Maintenance Man position which the
council gave staff approval to fill on May 8, 1978. This position is
critical to the operation of the water division and is responsible for
flushing hydrants, as well as repairing, maintaining and reading
water meters.
Since this position is funded in the 1978 budget and is a crucial
position in terms of workload, it is the recommendation of the staff that
the moratorium be lifted to permit the filling of this position.
Respectfully sukitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /jkl
cc: Personnel Director
Finance Director
Public Works Director
'N
. f
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 148
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Resolution Authorizing Sale of Certain Real Property
On March 27, 1978, the city council authorized the staff to advertise for
and accept proposals for sale of several city owned lots in the New Ford Town
subdivision. At that time, the council also approved the criteria for bid submission
and selection.
The lots were advertised for sale in one edition each of the Minneapolis
Tribune, Richfield Sun, Twin Cities Courier and the Minneapolis Spokesman.
Proposal packets with an Invitation for Informal Proposals were mailed to all of
the adjacent property owners and a list of 72 interested developers. Sealed
proposals were accepted until May 5, 1978 and were publicly opened on May 10,
1978.
The criteria adopted by the city council included the following requirements;
1. Proposals should provide for the development of a three or four
bedroom single family dwelling on each lot, through on -site con-
struction or by moving an already built structure to a lot;
2. Multi- family units could be developed where appropriate;
3. If all criteria were met, the bid should be awarded to the
proposer offering the highest price.
Thirty -three proposals were received from ten dividuals and /or corporations
for thirteen lots. The city council approved the advertising for sale of fourteen
lots; however, due to a potential title problem with one of the lots, the staff delayed
advertising it until the title was cleared.
A listing of all the proposals received is attached. This list also includes
the criteria used by the New Home Committee as a basis for review of the proposals.
Five lots were advertised as being suitable for multi - family development, and eight
lots were advertised as suitable for single family development.
Council Letter No. 148 -2- May 22, 1978
1 . The lots advertised as suitable for multi- family development
(6519, 6513, 6527, 6535 21st Avenue) comprise a unit of land
measuring 250 feet by 135 feet and border on one side with existing
multi- family units. The recommended proposal for these lots was
submitted by Charles Waiss. He is proposing to build five double
bungalows on this site. Each unit is to have two bedrooms and
approximately 1, 040.
It is recommended that lots 5, 6 , 7 , 8 and 9, Block 5, New Ford
Town be sold to Charles Waiss Construction at a total price of
$39,425.00.
2. A single family development proposal for Lot 8, Block 6 (6533 22nd
Avenue) was received from Thompson and Tonsager Construction in
the amount of $7,100.00. They propose to build a three - bedroom
house with 938 square feet which would be resold for $45, 900.
It is recommended that Lot 8, Block 6, be sold to Thompson and
Tonsager Construction for $7, 100.00.
3. Four proposals were received for Lot 19, Block 6 (6516 Standish
Avenue). The proposal which meets the criteria was submitted by
Steve Rosen. Mr. Rosen offered to purchase the lot for $8, 000 and
proposes to move the house presently located at 6515 Grand Avenue
to this lot. The Rosens submitted proposals for three lots, but are
only interested in purchasing one. Since they also offered the best
proposal for another lot, it is recommended that Lot 19, Block 6, be
sold to Mary Anderson Construction, which submitted the next best
proposal, in the amount of $7,050.00. Mary Anderson proposes
to build a four bedroom dwelling which would sell for $52, 300. 00.
4. The proposal for lot 6, Block 7, (6521 Standish) which best meets
the criteria was received from Larry Stein, who proposed to purchase
the lot for $10,100, and to build a three bedroom house for resale at
$44,900.00.
It is recommended that Lot 6, Block 7 be sold to Mr. Larry Stein in
the amount of $10,100.00.
5. Proposals for Lot 4, Block 13 (6413 -22nd Avenue) were received from
five interested purchasers. The highest dollar proposal was submitted
by Ms, Jeanne Gauger in the amount of $10,101.00. She is proposing
to reserve the lot for open space. Her proposal was accompanied by
a petition dated April 3 and April 4, 1978, signed by adjacent property
owners who indicated their compliance with this proposed action.
Since Ms. Gauger's proposal did not meet the criteria established
by the city council, it is recommended that this parcel be sold to
the second highest bidder, Mr. Steve Rosen, in the amount of
Council Letter No. 148 -3- May 22, 1978
$8,500.00. As stated earlier, the Rosens are proposing to move
the house now located at 6515 Grand Avenue.
Although Ms. Gauger is willing to pay more for the property than
Mr. Rosen, her unwillingness to build a home on the property
diminishes its taxable value. For example, on an empty lot
with a taxable falue of $10,000 non - homestead, Ms. Gauger
would pay property taxes of $449.00 per year. A $53, 000 house
on the property would pay homesteaded property taxes of $1,447.
The direct benefit value to the city and other governmental agencies
is about $1,000 per year in tax revenue resulting from development
of the property rather than maintaining it as open space.
Furthermore, the Rosens proposal helps meet the city's housing
goal of developing additional moderate income housing, while also
providing opportunity to preserve one of the homes being displaced
by the L /H /N project. It is, therefore, recommended that Lot 4,
Block 13 be sold to Mr. Steve Rosen in the amount of $8,500.00.
6. The proposal submitted by Mary Anderson Construction for purchase
of Lot 9, Block 14 (6432 Standish Avenue) best met the criteria.
The Anderson company plans to build a four bedroom house with
1,040 square feet on the property with a resale price of $49,950.
It is recommended that Lot 9, Block 14 be sold to Mary Anderson
Construction in the amount of $7,050.00.
7. Two proposals were received for purchase of Lot 16, Block 19
(6332 22nd Avenue). Mr. Charles Waiss submitted a proposal
for $6,000.00 and plans to build a three bedroom house on the lot
which will sell for $55,000.
It is recommended that Lot 16, Block 19 be sold to Mr. Charles
Waiss in the amount of $6,000.
8. The staff also recommends that Lot 17, Block 19 (6328 22nd Avenue)
be sold to Mr. Charles Waiss. Mr. Waiss proposes to buy this
property for $6,000 also and to build a three - bedroom house for
resale at $55,000.00.
9. The proposal for Lot 8, Block 19 (6329 21st Avenue) best meeting
the criteria was received from Mary Anderson Construction Company
in the amount of $8,050.00. The bidder proposes to construct a
four bedroom house on the property to be sold for $51,400.
Council Letter No. 148 -4- May 22, 1978
It is recommended that Lot 8, Block 19 be sold to Mary
Anderson Construction Company in the amount of $8,050.00.
The staff has obtained signed purchase agreements from the bidders who
are recommended for purchase of these properties. It is, therefore, recommended
that the council adopt the attached resolution, authorizing sale of the thirteen
lots as described herein.
Respectfully submitted,
W'�"
'-s,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
Finance Director
City Attorney
lam,
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield authorized the advertising and
acceptance of informal proposals on March 27, 1978 for the sale of
certain New Ford Town lots, and
WHEREAS, these certain lots were publicly advertised, and
WHEREAS, informal proposals were accepted for the purchase of
these lots, and
WHEREAS, informal proposals were received in the below - stated
amounts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Richfield, Minnesota-that the City Manager be granted authority
to execute the sale of the following lots at the following prices
with the covenant provisions that the lots be developed for housing
as proposed by the developers within one year of purchase:
1) Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 in Block 5 to Charles Waiss Construc-
tion in the amount of $39,425.00;
2) Lot 8, Block 6 to Thompson & Tonsager Construction in the
amount of $7,100.00;
3) Lot 19, Block 6 to Marvin Anderson Construction in the
amount of $7,050.00;
4) Lot 6, Block 7 to Larry Stein in the amount of $10,100.00;
5) Lot 4, Block 13 to Steve Rosen in the amount of $8,500.00;
6) Lot 9, Block 14 to Marvin Anderson Construction in the
amount of $7,050.00;
7) Lot 16, Block 19 to Charles Waiss Construction in the amount
of $6,000.00;
8) Lot 17, Block 19 to Charles Waiss in the amount of $6,000.00;
9) Lot 8, Block 19 to Marvin Anderson Construction in the amount
of $8,050.00.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this
day of , 1978.
ATTEST:
l
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
Loren L. Law, Mayor
NEW HOME PROGRAM SUMMARY
In 1975, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield
formulated the New Home Program as a vehicle for clearing sub-
standard properties in the City and for providing housing
affordable to large size, moderate income families. The
Authority would purchase a substandard house at market value,
which has averaged approximately $16,000, finance the removal
of any structures, and resell the land at a reduced rate for
moderately priced, three or four bedroom homes. The proceeds
from the land sales would then be used to establish a revolving
fund for future acquisitions.
In order to build up this revolving fund
program, the Authority is putting up for
Ford Town Addition. Sale will go to the
bid, however, other qualifications must
the Proposal Data. These qualifications
the City's goal of providing housing for
income families.
thus continuing the
bid 13 lots in the New
highest bidder. In the
De met, as outlined in
are necessary to meet
large size, moderate
Eight of the 13 lots being offered for sale would only be suitable
for single- family dwellings; however five of these lots would
also be suitable for multi - familiy dwellings. The Authority is
requesting that these five lots be sold for multi- family
development since there is a need for more multi - family units in
Richfield.
EQUAL HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY
NEW HOME PROGRAM
PROPOSAL DATA
Proposals should include the following:
a) Purchase price to be paid for the land;
b) Statement regarding purchaser's willingness to assume
responsibility for applicable special assessments, pro rata
ad valorem taxes, and site clearance;
c) Brief description of the structure to be built, including
specifically the number of bedrooms (at least three), the
total area of the dwelling, the architectural style of the
structure, and the degree of finishing. Proposals which
include alternate land prices with corresponding degrees
of finishing in the dwelling to be built are encouraged;
d) Site plan with the location of the house, accessory buildings,
improvements, and public streets and alleys shown;
e) Estimated market value of the house upon completion, which
will be the maximum purchase price for which the property
can be resold if built by a contractor /developer. This
price cannot be less than $42,500;
f) Estimated construction schedule; (construction should begin
within two months and be completed within eight months)
g) Security deposit of $200.00 in the form of a certified check
or performance bond. (The proposal security will either be
applied to the purchase price if the selected party does not
default or returned to unsuccessful parties.)
h) Executed purchase agreement -- purchase agreements will be
furnished upon request, including the approved Addendum.
The successful purchaser will also be given a special Warranty Deed
to insure that the property is not purchased for speculative purposes
and that the &,elling, if it is to be resold immediately, will be
sold for the price stipulated in the proposal. The form of this Deed
is included in this information packet.
All proposals must be received at the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority office at 7000 Nicollet Avenue South by 4:30 P.M. on
May 5, 1478.
A proposal may be submitted for more than one lot; however, all
proposals must include each of the aforementioned items.
NOTE: Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Block 5 would be very suitable for a
multi - family dwelling. The purchaser, however, must request a
zoning change since each lot is zoned single - family.
The following is the pertinent data for the lots.
1. 6519 21st Avenue S
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public
Minimum Acceptable
Legal Description:
suth
sewer, water, and natural gas
Purchase Price: $7,000
Lot 5, Block 5, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
2. 6523 21st Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $7,000
Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 5, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
3. 6527 21st Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $7,000
Legal Description: Lot 7, Block 5, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
4. 6531 21st Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water., and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $7,000
Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 5, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
5. 6535 21st Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $6,500
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block 5, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
6. 6533 22nd Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $6,500
Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 6, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
7. 6516 Standish Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135.6'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $6,500
Legal Description: Lot 19, Block 6, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
8. 6521 Standish Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $6,500
Legal Description: Lot 6, Block 7, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
6413 22nd Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $7,000
Legal Description: Lot 4, Block 13, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
10. 6431 Standish Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $6,500
Legal Description: Lot 9, Block 14, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
11. 6332 22nd Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135.6'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $5,750
Legal Description: Lot 16, Block 19, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
12, 6328 22nd Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135.6'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $5,750
Legal Description: Lot 17, Block 19, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
6329 21st Avenue South
Size: 50' x 135'
Utilities: Public sewer, water, and natural gas
Minimum Acceptable Purchase Price: $7,000
Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 19, New Ford Town Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Special Assessments: None
Taxes: No present taxes; to be assessed following purchase
Site Clearance: None
4
63rd
,MAC4
12
4
20
4r
lo 01":1
17
7
yob
, 10
"ac
;o i io. a
410 11 It
co f so c),
l G06
13 14
So ;�,l
xr�
J
10 ' it It i l3
l 14
gAO MAC
to
MAC MAC
J f.
&D L
11 mAc j MAC
0 IL AC YAC
64 th
1
D5j.
0 24
.A
%OA
4
20
Nt 11
•
17
...........
16
II
14
65th
KA Ul
ILI I
Tj
20
10
i 1
12
13 14
4
14
,MAC4
12
4
20
7
lo 01":1
17
7
yob
, 10
"ac
4
14
3 72
12
4
20
7
Ie
17
7
yob
, 10
c-i
N
GO
ST
4 '0"'!
ST.
24
0 2 w, 23
3 72
4
20
7
Ie
17
7
yob
13
"ac
;o i io. a
410 11 It
co f so c),
l G06
13 14
So ;�,l
c-i
N
GO
ST
4 '0"'!
ST.
24
0 2 w, 23
3 72
4
7
Ie
10 j &1
7
yob
13
ST.
4
-------------
5 :5
lw 11? °' 4, go l,lao 111:10
ui
C14
-P
U)
r.0
_14
C, VAC
Ap"
,Y.Ac 4 Um t c
,vAc5 r,MAC 20
-AC is
0 n.) VAC 11
,�DD 611-,
�2
13
4
7
7
yob
10
"ac
, 4
xr�
J
r- 1 A I
Z:
13
4
S
7
17
•
"ac
mAc 7 Ac
i �0
10 ' it It i l3
l 14
gAO MAC
to
MAC MAC
"a
16.
rf)
0i
60
.910 , 11 � il t I - 4
VAC MA a ..AA
:YAC
5YAC MAC
•
"ac
mAc 7 Ac
gAO MAC
to
MAC MAC
J f.
&D L
11 mAc j MAC
0 IL AC YAC
"a
16.
rf)
0i
60
.910 , 11 � il t I - 4
VAC MA a ..AA
Party of the first part ( "HRA ") is selling, assigning and conveying
the above - described property to party of the second part in further-
ance of HRA's New Home Program, and compliance with the objects and
purposes of that program is of the essence in this transaction. It
is therefore stipulated and agreed between the parties hereto as
follows:
Party of the second part shall promptly begin and diligently bring
to completion the development of the property above described
through the construction of a single family residence thereon or the
moving of a single- family residence thereto and in all events such
construction or move shall begin within two (2) months of the date
hereof and be completed within eight (8) months of the date hereof.
Party of the second part further agrees that upon completion of
such improvements the premises, including such improvement, shall
not be resold by party of the second part for a selling price of
less than Forty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($42,500.00).
When such covenants have been fulfilled by party Qfsecond part,
HRA will issue a certificate of compliance indicating that such
covenants have been fulfilled and that such covenants, which until
such time run with the land, have been released and discharged.
Until release of such covenants by HRA as herein provided, they
shall be, to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity, bind-
ing for the benefit of HRA and enforceable by HRA against party
of the second part, its successors and assigns to or of the above -
described permises or any interest therein. In the event that
developer (1) fails to complete the improvement of the property as
hereinbefore provided within the period of time specified above or
(2) fails to sell the improved premises in accordance with the
limitations herein provided, and any such failure shall not be
cured within sixty (60) days after written demand to do so by HRA
to party of the second part, then HRA shall have the right to reenter
and take possession of the property to terminate and to revest in HRA
the estate conveyed by this instrument to party of second part.
It is the intent of this provision, together with other provisions
of this agreement, that the conveyance of the above - described
property to party of the second part is.being made upon the condition
subsequent that in the event of any failure on the part of party of
the second part, and such failure continues for more than sixty (60)
days after the notice as above provided, HRA shall at its option
declare a termination in favor of HRA, and thereupon the title and
all rights and interests in and to the property conveyed by this
instrument to party of second part, and any assigns or successors in
interest to and in the premises above described shall revert to HRA.
It is recognized by party of the first part that the party of the
second part may obtain a construction loan and mortgage on the
subject property. In order to facilitate such a mortgage the fore-
going restrictions are modified to the following extent:
Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this instrument
party of the second part may obtain construction financing secured
by a mortgage upon the subject property, provided that such mort-
gage is given to secure a loan of (a) funds only to the extent
necessary for making the aforementioned improvements to the property
and (b) such additional funds, if any, as shall not exceed the price
paid by party of the second part to party of the first part for the
subject premises. Party of the second part shall advise party of
the first part in writing as to the source and amount of such mort-
gage is filed against the subject premises.
The holder of any such mortgage shall not be obligated to construct
or complete the improvements on the subject premises or to sell the
premises for a specified price or a specified down payment, in the
event that such mortgagee should foreclose its mortgage and succeed
to the ownership of the subject premises.
N
U
f~
N
v
a
x
v
ro
m
s~
O
•r-4 d•3
4J S~
U �
•r-4 4J
4-1 (Ij
• r-4 N
rd +3
t3' r-i
rd
�4 4J
v U
a v
O +3
r-i •r�
� U
v �4
M
O24 • r-4
m
ss �J
O
• r-I U
A m
� 4-t
� o
.H
ro m
�J v
rl U
U •rl
Q4
v
U)
v �
`Ld �
ri
U) >~
0 �4
Q r.
m
O a
34 >1
a +-)
r-I N M
4
41
LH
m
0
0
m
s~
rrJ
0
0
Ln
N
'T
Vj-
m
4J
U)
UI
Q)
r1
O
U
U)
r4
O
4-4
m
f~
O
ro
v
'zS
• r-I
0
U
v
v
v
:A
x
4J
ro
Q)
4J
rd
Q4
.H
U
4J
4
4J
N
R,
O
r1
v
Q)
ro
F-
ro
r-I
a
4J
v
04
O
N
v
Q
v
v
v
04
E+
O
U
v
41
•r-I
3 m
>i �4
+-J
•ri
r v
0 •i--4
4-4
r� �4
O O
U 44
L;
T
4J
0
Q)
a-3
4-4
0
v
U
a
N
U)
U
N
U)
0
R,
O
a
4-i
O
I
O
O
O
44
1"
S.
�
a
O
rI
N
14
F-
0
v
::5
3
�
o
+�
4J
ri
S 4
FC
•r•1
r(j
U)
-4
rA
rd
O
O
4J
O
0
-rA
LP
FC
-r
FC
r
r~
4-)
v
O
Eq
rI
ro
• rq
m
ro
U
.Q
+4-)
o
N
w
P
s~
1~
E-i
v
v
O
v
0
x
Q
44
1~
O
O
�4
�4
ET;
r
41
E-+ U)
v
o
ro
O
r 4
.,A
ro
ro
�+
4x O
v
4-)
O
0
• J
r-I
rq
0
r i
(0
v
rc5
m
O
O
N
W
H
ro
ro
G4
z
ro
�
4
A
.0
•
z
(15
E�
• -
3
'0
FC
3
fd
m
H
4-4
U
ao
0
0
'0
�
v
4-4
�
�
�
v
0
0
z
0
�
�
z
1
�
U,
4-)
rl
P4
m
N
�'
3
0
0
v
�
v
U)
v
v
- r-4
-
rvi
�
'.o
U)i
a�
v
�
`n
g
0
P
Ei
m
U)
v
O
ro
U
O
E-+
r1
s~
v
A
rl
x
_C:
O
Z
�
v
ctU
ri
U
ro
m
m
�4
m
ri
a
9�
a
O
3
V
ro
IH
0
w
w°
0
ro
°
0
m
rn
�
4
a w
,�,
w
r
I
v
4-)
O
ZS
z
O
>
ro
r1
r1
v
N
N
N
C� z
rA
m
�,
m
0
Z
z
-
rU
O
v
R,
v
m
O H
4-1
4-J
z
44 �
s~
�
-H
�
-A
-1
�
m
O
r
U
4-)
N
U
H
r-I
� 4
.
t`
r I
-i
iS
(d
r0
O
rd
v
t"
a
0
4x U
Q
r
,�
X
,x
x
ro
v
v
-u
m
m
cd
O
4-4
4J
U
U
U
�4
m
rd
4J
-W
v
-r-I
H
G+ Ga
O
v
-
ro
O
O
0
cd
rd
O
Ln
0
r
3
�4
O
[
lfl
0
r--1
r-I
r4
ri
r I
r 1
r-I
0
v
cd
W
W
Pa
O w
4J
1
41
�4
r,
r-1
-P
—1
>
41
-r-I
H co
r4
f--
41
rn
oo
m
0
�j
o
-1
O
ri
O
i4
H
U
O
H
r-1
04
U
a
FC
FC
U
< x
3
m
m
m
EA U
v
m
41
4J
4-1
4J
4J
41
v
N
is
N
b�
H a
.Ci
r-1
ro
O
o
0
0
0
0
o
s::
:~
�:)
m
v
a
a
w
a
a
a
P
4-I
P
r I
z a
m
+1
3
3
H
0
rd
m
O
0
ia+
U
r-I
rl
r-I
O
O
rd
r4
r4
�1
m
O
O
O
44
44
m
�),
r1
4-1
O
v
v
�°
a
4J
41
N
U
f~
N
v
a
x
v
ro
m
s~
O
•r-4 d•3
4J S~
U �
•r-4 4J
4-1 (Ij
• r-4 N
rd +3
t3' r-i
rd
�4 4J
v U
a v
O +3
r-i •r�
� U
v �4
M
O24 • r-4
m
ss �J
O
• r-I U
A m
� 4-t
� o
.H
ro m
�J v
rl U
U •rl
Q4
v
U)
v �
`Ld �
ri
U) >~
0 �4
Q r.
m
O a
34 >1
a +-)
r-I N M
4
41
LH
m
0
0
m
s~
rrJ
0
0
Ln
N
'T
Vj-
m
4J
U)
UI
Q)
r1
O
U
U)
r4
O
4-4
m
f~
O
ro
v
'zS
• r-I
0
U
v
v
v
:A
x
4J
ro
Q)
4J
rd
Q4
.H
U
4J
4
4J
N
R,
O
r1
v
Q)
ro
F-
ro
r-I
a
4J
v
04
O
N
v
Q
v
v
v
04
E+
O
U
v
41
•r-I
3 m
>i �4
+-J
•ri
r v
0 •i--4
4-4
r� �4
O O
U 44
L;
T
4J
0
Q)
a-3
4-4
0
v
U
a
N
U)
U
N
U)
0
R,
O
a
I
[V
I
K n y K K O > a 0 Cr a rt O of a
(D (D C (D (D Ft, �5 �l r• 'C In �r K K G
n � (D n n IZ rt (D a 0
(D rt G (D (D rt a rt Ft, a r• (D
r K G P. r- �3' R, rt �Y O ro G G
C a (D C ro (D R, lT a (D K K '•C a o
R, ~ (n p, (t ro � O ro � O ((DD K
¢, o o G cZ ro rt a F_ (D rt - �Q
it a G a F_h K G K Gr K K :a' G
�c y I,< rt rt �rl 5 (D (D rt o F3 rt (D rt a H
Gv F✓ G' N rt �r ro r• rh �3 r- K O K �y
P. (D r• - rt H G' a r• a tr (D t-h (D (D ro a (D
rt s2 (D m In K a m (D to r-t, O �:$
(D a (n K r• a LQ rt (�
Fl- rr r• K r• ro rt r• (n G O K �< r•
rt o o G a K r- In a t-h rt a rt
C rt �r Ft, ro t-h LQ (D O X rt O o
F'- rh Ft, O O K (n t-h r• O K K O
K 5 r• r• (n K (D (D O G G ::5
(D (D (D n a (D G O K Q ro a - t7 O
In N (D N a �l rt rh G F-' (D r•
(D O of m N (D F-' �J ro K r• K rt
K - O �:5 L< a (D ro �3'
C It ro rt LQ O �3' K K r• (D
(D G K ro O ro a O 7 K
(n m r• rt In o a o G rt o m ro m �Q
�C �3' rt ro G G K r• (n (D O a rt
rf (D O of rt a a - In a fn a
�J- Ln (D (n (D �r rt F, a Cr O ;7v
(D - In h7 (D a a 5 a r• In tr F- Cr r• r• (D
o F- I- p, 1_0 In o G In (D N N (n
K N rt a r• In Q, F- (D G rt a r•
r• o G (D a K rt n
LQ V �J rt a O ro K r- O O
�3 oo r• E (D 1-h K a F- G - G K
rr U-) G K G PA K O rt ro QL
In Q r• (D r- ro G' O In r• r-
rt � rt- Cr (D G' O (D G G G rt 5
O m t 7 r• � l �5 (D In K o r• P. ro
W r• G r• (D a rt rt rt O F-
Fl K LQ F' rt G SZ F_ a G a G r•
(D Cr (D - F �3 rt (D m (n C3' (D tr In (D
u• l< t7 (D rt (D r• - In
(D rt In Cr 0 a (D 0 H
n .a o (D (D n O r• r• X K O r• In a
rt •• K a r• G FI F' ro (D G rt G �J
w - F-I Cl rt rt (D F_j K LQ In '•C Cr -<
a o (D (D a ¢, (D a rt I
N rn P, rt r• Ur (n K K O In
F' O __I (D �:% rt (D (n of G K O a
C) p) K r• (D r• (D CZ r• K
ro n o G �l H G K G O of rt F-' H K
K N Rl r• G' LQ �l m G r• o a
O O ro G (D In (D (n zr O rt 0 �:l
ro n O (D rt Il o rt
O x' K G Cl (D �r O O t-h G k<
In rt In x O ti, V Fi, rt O O 0,
a ro F-' rr Fh a (n .< Gr K K r•
N a O 0 (D (n r• (D rt a
In G tr F' rt a rt In Cr P. m
• IDi (D F_j rt F- �3 rt 0 a G O (n
O rt (D (D (D (D r• F� r• G G
P_ K 5 (D (D �j I
G �l in In O r•
L.Q (n rt t-h G
LJQ
l
K
ro
(1
�l
�l
LL�
rfi
(D
G
O
(D
(D
P.
O
to
K
G
G
G
C
K
r
ro
m
rt
rt
(D
O
r-
G
p,
O
(n
Q,
In
a
(D
o
(D
0
m
n
a,
o
(D
G
r'
m
a
N
ro
ro
O
•
¢
o
o
�
o
(D
rt
C
ro
(D
rt
K
G
r
O
G
In
K
(D
(D
pL
rn
rt
(D
O
a
U-1
-
a
(D
(D
rt,
(n
In
r
(n
O
O
rn
rt-
(D
K
O
rt
-
r
N
£
�J
rt
m
a
O
LQ
O
a
N
rt
-
K
rt
G•
O
F,
K
' C
(D
(D
K
rb
O
(D
K
In
-
rt
N
K
�:5
(D
rt
(n
O
(D
a
G'
(D
O
(D
O
(D
G
G
rt
(D
w
in
In
r-
In
m
F-
rt
a
G
r•
rt,
o
Fl-
Q
G
a
n
Z3r
x
(D
G
F
r•
H.
F_
o
(D
n
H
(n
�l
O
rt
' C
-
(D
rt
rh
(CD
(D
_
((DD
F-'
F-h
r•
O
(D
o
O
O
ro
K
Cr
(D
rt
a
r-
o
of
a
K
(D
G
K
G
r-
(D
LQ
a
N
G
In
t-h
In
In
rt
(D
r•
O
H
¢
K
(n
I
(D
E
Fl-
rh
G
m
ro
G
G
a
rt
G
K
LQ
FA
r-
n
Fl-
F-
r•
�31
a
o
a
(D
N
(D
F-
K
'C
'C
R
r
tfi
n
Q,
(D
rt
it
�
rt
C
(D
F'-
(D
(D
N
E
(n
N
Fl
N
O
r•
G
�C
I--
z
O
ro
F-
P.
P_
N•
I
F,
rt
::;
F-
I
a
s2
Fl
Cr
Cr
N
F•'
(D
p
z
W
W
a
W
U)
x
U
a
a
0
E4
Q
z
W
Q
Q
K4
z
w
W
V
E1
w
Q
a
W
H
W
x
U
H
a
w
0
E-4
H
U
Q
z
v
rd
I~
ro
v
a
O
r-I
N
v
0
41
• ri
U
a m
fli
>,
4-
A
O
Qv
Z
o v
::j
fd
rd
v 4
N
X
4-4
v
v
0
Q)
rn
a-)
r I
rd
v
U)
rd
U
r1
i4
v m
m o
4J
•r1
104
o v
°4.3 a
O
a m
>~
4-+
a o
r1
Q) r
rd I
ID4 >
rI
O
4J
v °
ri U
rd
v
v
N
f v
�
U
a)
O v
v •
4J v
404
4J
v t
O
v
�4 r
ri ^
N �
� >
4-)
v
O4-) U
rd
$A fu
fu
�. r
ul
�" -
-P '
'IT U
U X
X
rd
v
4J
ro
ra
r
v O
O v
v N
�
i-I
O
ON
rd
4"
P
r-I
a
4-J
�
�
v
U) y
ya v
v a
w
aJ U
v
a
-
v
v U
U) r
r-1 :
:I H
H
3 o
H
W
v
v O
O A
En
rrdd �
� s
s~
> r
rd -
-) 0
0 H
U
H -
-A x
xi r
r-♦ r
r-I s
s~ 0
0 0
04
rd
I~
ro
v
a
O
r-I
N
v
0
41
• ri
U
O v to r�I • • rd 04 � I~ v v
s~ -1 U) In >~ cd rd v o U r 1
O v -H �-I H O rz: rd S 1 5 U
.r-I > Is,, >T •rl ra 0 �4 •r1 rd -H N d
4-1 v rd ..
rd rd H 3 O �" � S". Q4 4� rd w X! b
�4 Ic: >1 aJ 44 0 rd ro 0 rd rd H N
T5 .IJ H v a m 41 U• H 04 v A 4-) rd i 4
H 3 �4 U •I) rd U 4-1 D P N U)
U) U) v H rd
s~ 4-3 v � Ei X! U1 rd U rd �-I O 4-) X1. 0 o U a -u 4-J 4-) •r-I v 4J •• ro -Ci m 4-)
U r 1 s~ U) F: , O U) rn 12 >1 v 4J Q
rd •ri U) •• r•I s~ v U) A d rd
r•I rd rd v (1) 0 i4 4-) r-•I v O r- S~
rtf •r1 �4 4J v d-) rd U rd -r•I rd rd A 3 o rd
rl 0 0 —1 f4 0 H >1 v = > 4J IJ •r•I
4-1 U) U ZT r-1 rd 44 r-1 rd �4 • I 4-) rd
m v rd W rd m O m U CL v O +-) r-I >~ rd
a +~ a •• �4 v v v rd s~ ri v x a s4 w rr
-u I~ 0 m v A 04 4-1 rd ro �4 �4 a 0 5 r 1 .rJ
U) r-I w 3 Ri • r•I N '>1 I -i rd I� r1 rd 4-1 0 U)
ro r-I w 0 0 $4 E-+ •r4 a �4 A rd U v S4
m a r•I r-1 U 04 � 0 r: r� v rd v
v v w r-I v U) o +-) r-I U rd A m rd -u
U) U) r-1 x 0 > v -1 O • �J • U r•i x rd
Wb 3-I E-4 404 r3 rd Q) a r I N rd Q4 W M ,Q +) dr rd r-I
x O 0 r b
3 5 Q z P �
O rd v O rrl
0 +) A 4-4 rd
4J
0
•ri
S4
O
UI
v
x
U]
0
0
44
0
U)
U
rd
4-1
0
Q)
U)
ro
U
v
A
a m
m
o v
v >
v 4
> v
v
v m
m o
o v
°4.3 a
a m
m C
a o
a
Q) r
rd I
ID4 >
>1 A
v °
ri U
U) O
O v
o a
C) a
f v
v:
U) 4
O v
v •
4J v
v t
to r
rt1 �
�4 r
ri ^
N �
� >
> U
^
O4-) U
U �
�. r
rd �
�" -
-P '
'IT U
U X
X
v rtf 4
4 v
v O
O v
v N
N >
>~ d
d
U) y
ya v
v a
aJ U
U) U
U) v
v U
U) r
r-1 :
:I H
H
3 o
o o
o v
v O
O A
A r
rrdd �
� s
s~
> r
rd -
-) 0
0 H
H -
-A x
xi r
r-♦ r
r-I s
s~ 0
0 0
0
•ri U
U) .
.O 4
4-4 r
r-I U (
(d `
`0 �
� b
b 0
0 }
}-1 d
d
U -
-r-I .
� n
U L
. r1 �J U
U v
v r
r I 4
4 r
rd L
L: O
O v
v
v 4
4-) �
n �
�
L U
U °
>
> r
rd
° w
j� r
rd 4
4I U) r
r1 r
r(S v
v 4
4J >
>1 r
r
00
�4 �
�4 r
N >
>1 U
U v
v O v
v .
.1J v
v r
rd 1
10 r
�4 v
rd 0
44 ,
, M
M r
rd R
R+ .
.. Z
Zs U
U) i
io 4
4 +
+) 1
1-I U
U)
4J
0
•ri
S4
O
UI
v
x
U]
0
0
44
0
U)
U
rd
4-1
0
Q)
U)
ro
U
v
A
I
N
1
�t
0
K
tr
G
H•
N
a
H•
a
K
x
0
rt
a
tr
H
N
H•
rt
O
�n
0
`rt
0
K
a
O
rt
G'
(D
K
a
rt
rt
(D
K
K
(D
F-
0
rt
H•
G
LQ
O
G
a
H•
rt
H-
0
G
a�
I
0
H-
0
O
G
a
H•
rt
H•
O
U)
a
K
a
H•
a
LQ
(D
G
H•
rt
a
Cr
H-
H
rt
k<
O
rn
N
O
rt
(D
P_
(t
O
K
a
x
(D
0
K
H-
(D
En
P)
G
K
(D
ro
K
O
En
(D
rt
a
rt
H•
O
G
In
0
O
G
(1
(D
K
H-
G
LQ
En
O
H•
N
H
rt
H•
m
G
G
a
0
K
In
rt
0
0
a
a
G
a
tr
(D
rt
(D
(D
G
rt
ro
a
K
rt
Fl-
(D
m
rt
a
rt
rt
(D
0
H-
rt
H
H
()
r
r7i
a
O
C
(D
N
O
0
K
O
a
0
0
0
In
t t
t-h
0
a
rt
a
-vn
rt
H
0
H
G
(D
O
N
H•
r•
a
O
O
G
G'
(D
G'
O
O
Gr
rt
a
(n
a
rt
o
H•
K
K
a
(D
G
H•
rt
G
(D
rt
rt
H•
G
rt
"0
n
m
C
O
G•
m
In
Gr
(D
O
a
n
(D
(D
0
H
i h
a
K
rt
H
O
H
a
�<
P.
a
-
H
�y
O
G
0
a
G'
�l
E
4
()
rt
rt
G
rt
(D
t-h
F,
�y
rt
a
(D
'_0
G'
(D
K
H
a
k<
.J'
K
a
a
m
(D
F�
F'
H•
(D
O
G
(D
o
n
a
rr
a
1_0
�
a
(D
n
a
(D
cn
a
(n
1Z3
(D
rt
a
(D
G
G
(D
m
(D
rt
G"
(D
5
H•
�3'
a
(D
x
P.
LQ
C
H
a
K
G
rt
C
H•
C
(D
G
a
a
(]
K
1-0
o
(D
(D
(n
H•
K
H•
(D
O
K
(D
G
4
(D
H
iQ
rt
(D
�:s
G
N
1_0
O
(D
�l
N
G
(D
F-•
rt
H,
H
G
'•C
G
in
rt
0
a
K
a
rt
(D
O
�l
o
In
H•
H•
(n
-
(n
VO
LQ
0
In
1.0
a
a
1_0
�r
C
G
(n
a
(D
-
(D
K
(D
a
H•
(D
a
(D
'o
H•
a
(n
n
K
(D
"0
(n
_�g
K
rt
G
K
N
K
O
rt
a
K
(D
rt
In
a
a
(D
In
F-J
G
H•
a
H-
G
(D
m
5
. G
rt
H•
(n
(n
rt
o
LQ
G
In
b
(D
tO
n
H•
G
G+
(n
G
1z3
G'
0
O
K
G
(D
(D
K
a
G
(D
G
in
rt
a
2S
G
(D
a
()
(D
-
a
to
(D
F--'
(t
K
rh
a
F-
(D
()
K
F-
(1
rt
0
a
(D
to
N
rh
In
a
H•
H
0
O
N
G
�V
(D
G
Ul
t-h
0
(D
O
G
0
G
b
H•
�l
a
K
(D
H-
a
H•
(D
t-h
G
a
>
K
K
rt
t h
x1
I_h
'o
a
'zf
'o
\
(]
G
rt
(D
�a
(D
O
a
G
H
H•
F-
rt
O
x
a
a
a
Fh
H
a
rt
K
K
H
(D
(D
' C
H
O
(D
K
G
H -
(]
rt
(D
H
G
<
1-ti
(n
G
()
a
rt
t-h
-
H
rt
C
0
(D
G
rt
H -
G
()
a
H•
tI
(D
O
CJ
(D
t-h
a
ri)
LQ
H-
c
a
r
(D
tr
rt
rt
(n
r7i
H•
a
K
a
r+
N
N
(D
(n
o
(D
-
trJ
0
0
H -
_IV
G
(n
LT1
a
0
'o
C
-
(n
G
ul
tr
G
(n
H
a
(D
rt
1i3
a
(D
a
H
H
a
rt
Ft
rt
H
y
G
a
N
H
(D
(D
l<
F_
a
�5
a
a
G
C
�
N
H
K
a
(7
H -
H
K
K
�
O
H•
(D
G
G
a
a
n
�
�
10
In
-
a
a
(D
(D
H -
rt
r
G
�
rt
a
�
a
rt
Cr
(D
(D
F•
°
N•
F-
rt
a
E
G
m
(D
F-
5
H
Fes'
rt
-<
rt
(D
a
a
G
a
t h
rt
(D
0
a
1-0
Hi
0
v
I,C
' C
K
rt
K
0
a
H•
F,
�<
"0
(D
a
H
(D
(D
(D
K
K
O
O
G
5
O
(D
H•
G
a
a
C
a
In
a
t-h
K
In
(n
L<
a
K
C1
G
a
rt
a
a
(D
G
a
(D
(D
G
O
Cr
L
K
a
a
rt
I-
In
a
rh
(D
a
O
G
rt
(n
rt
O
I-
a
::s
O
O
In
t-h
a
G'
G
Gr
C
t fi
H•
'C
t-h
K
G r
H•
(D
t-h
(D
(D
O
a
a
(n
a
o
a
Ft
O
a
rt
tfi
K
a
LQ
(D
rh
0
K
F-J
F-
H -
a
H•
rt
l<
(D
t-h
(D
N
rt
0
a
O
a
F-
O
�l
n
H•
O
to
K
a
rt-
0
G'
a
G
O
H•
�l
0
f-h
-
O
G
rt
(D
H•
a
O
(D
G
(D
(D
n
0
rt
O
(n
K
F-
:Q
F--'
a
t-h
a
G
G
G
K
a
0
"C
(D
H•
K
rt
rt
O
'iJ
rt
a
Cr
F-
(n
a
rt
G
t-h
a
(D
to
G'
(D
tr
,.<
O
H•
tr
Gr
10
O
tr
G
a
(D
(D
a
0
In
G
H•
H•
(D
(D
0
t-h
0
0
n
n
G
0
C
rt
N
G
F-
(n
G
G
H,
G
a
a
G•
(D
G'
G
0
H•
In
hj
-(r`
a
O
F�
a
(D
a
K
F,
rt
K
rt
N
(n
a
K
rt
rt
N
F-
K
H•
rt
o
G'
o
H-
vt
(D
(D
G
O
H•
-
a
(D
G
C
(D
H•
G
rt
@
0
rt
In
H-
(n
(D
H•
o
rt
LQ
(D
H•
O
O
G'
(n
F'•
-
1
t h
o
Gv
K
1
rh
t-h
G
G
o
LQ
F-
F�
O
1
O
0 0
rt rt
m �
I 1
x x
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
U)
G'
a
Fl
Fl
a
rt
(D
0
H•
rt
rt
(D
rh
O
Fl
'
0
H•
w
In
G
m
a
a
a
O
G
G
rt
In
> (J�
cn •
a
�0
(D (D rt
�J (D
rt lzi
o atr
0
Kv
n
a
(D
O
a
0
c
(D
a
(D
ul
0
K
H•
13'
(D
a
N
0
rt
rt
(D
a
(D
c
(D
N
O
(D
K
A
v
a
�4
U
H
S4
in
z
x
rd
U
N
m
O
N
f�
S4
+1
M
+1
cn
::j
(Tj
a
0
m
.0
m
o
w
r=;
+-J
4
a
O
C04
I~
W
>~
�
H
N
.s~
O
Q
4-I
H
m
v
Q
R+
W
Si
O
N
11
z
A
O
v
•ri
A
m
v
4-4
4-)
ro
}4
3
En
v
r
Q)
v
3
D
v
>1
U
m
td
•�
v
D
U
N
S4
I~
Iq
:>
>
O
r1
v
>4
rt
A
rd
df
U
r-I
::5
.C�
rd
Qa
b
r1
rd
m
v
4J
r I
$4
O
4-)
r-I
4-1
m
U
v
�4
7
r-{
v
S4
O
v
O
m
U
rtS
S-I
H
rO
4-1
+1
4-4
44
s 4
r-I
m
O
m
m
�4
I~
+1
O
m
rd
HO
J
Q.,
`c$
>1
M
+q
m
m
N
w
cd
v
i4
T5
ss
a
U
4
W
ro
m
I~
rl
4J
U
::5
m
a
ro
124
rt
s~
41
H
m
U
m
O
m
4-I
Ei
H
v
v
• r1
v
O
C4
>~
r I
E-+
m
s~
4-)
4-1
>
F(
H
rd
R'
•ri
4-J
Ri
U
3+
rd
U
s~
A
ro
S
•ri
+1
4-)
O
•ri
4-1
•
�4
�
A
--I
v
w
v
4J
ri
4
O
!4
4-4
O
.c�
m
�
r•I
v
o
w
4.1
>~
fo
A
r-i
.Q
a
O
Ri
r-♦
m
W
44
U
v
4J
ro
zs
m
I~
x
O
rd
Q
m
S4
O
r4
m
v
m
ri
r f
m
U)
rd
:>~
a
v �
o
z
U
41
41
O
14
•r1
i4
E
i4
L'
-4
ra
Qa
H
�..
a
v
v
v
v
A
3
v
104
rO
I~
>
A
O
v
ro
r1
v
s~
z
rc5
Q)
N
F�
A
>,
m
H
H
rd
fil
4J
4J
aai
v
m
41
rq
0
O
•r1-I
rl
N
o
4J
A
a
�4
H
S4
in
x
>
U
td
rd
f�
F
a
a
m
m
o
w
+-J
4
a
O
H
H
W
H
Q
H
>1
U
W
m
OU
It
I
I
• PROPOSAL FORM
Address o,f Lot:
Purchase Price for Land:
Site Clearance to be Assumed:
Structure Description:
Number of Bedrooms:
Area of Dwelling:
Architectural Style:
Degree of Interior Finish:
Other:
Estimated Market Value with Land:
Construction Schedule:
Estimated Number of Calendar Days After Resale When Construction
Will Begin:
Estimated Number of Calendar Days From Time of Construction Start
to Completion:
Estimated Number of Calendar Days From Time of Completion to Resale
of House (if applicable)
,.....
t-r4l a.,
-A NEW FORD TOWN LOTS -e �jbta�tbg
ONC141 &tCtqP� *�e PdQ lr
1. Myron Gunderson, 6601 Knox
2. Loyal Thompson 6345 Girard Ave.
3. George C. Maurer Construction, Richfield Bank Building
6625 Lyndale Ave. So.
4. Parmod Nevile, 333 8th St. S.E. #210, 55414
5. Raymond Peach, 6600 Columbus Avenue; 866 -9562
6. May Martin, Mary Anderson Realty, 8901 Lyndale Ave. 888 -7416
7. John Brolsma Construction, 506 W. Mission Road, 55420
8. Dahle Brothers Construction, 9101 Stevens, 55420
9. Gunderson Builders Inc. 6720 Upton Avenue
10. Evans Meineke, 5027 Drew Ave. So. 55410
11. Joseph Kluck 103 N. Blake Road, Hopkins, 55343, 933 -6516
12. M. Rubinger, 2601 Sunset Blvd Apt. 2C, Mpls, 55416
13. Tom Somers, 1020 W. Burnsville Crstwn, 55337
14. Michael Swain 6 -01 -E-. 67 -th -St- 861 -3451, 831 -7973 (days)
r15. Tom Kobs, 1001 E 77th St. 861 -1154
16. Larry McPeck 6437 19th Ave. 866 -6991
17. Richard Johander 7639 Stevens Ave.
18. Paul Hannan, 5200 W. 102 #314, Bloomington, 55437
19. Gary Balmer 6245 2nd Ave
20. Kurt Miller, 6920 13th Ave.
21. Christian Brand, 7209 15th Ave.
22. Oscar Moslat, 6920 Oliver Ave. So.
23. Ms. Pat Rothfork, 7333 Gallagher dr14Edina, 55435
24. LeRoy Miller, 610 Logan Ave. No. 55411
25. Glen Clark, 7625 Bush Lake Rd, Edina, MN 55435, 831 -6211
26. W. H. Henrickson, 7601 Morgan, 55423
27. Denway Homes, 3432 Palmer Ave. Bloomington, 55437
}
r
28.
Mark Birkeland, 6644 Russell So., 866 -6701
29.
Jean Swain 6445 Newton Ave. So. 866 -6701
30.
Dennis Mattson, 10800 Lyndale
31.
Wayne Gavin 7509 Oakland
32.
Tom Sheahan 10985 Hyland Eden Prairie, 55343
33.
George Wise, 7544 Dupont Ave. So.
34.
Mrs. Brening 6833 Penn Ave.
35.
Burton Kicker, Spring Company, 9740 Irving, 55431, 884 -7476
36.
Donna Davis Aiidreasen, 4811 Drew Ave. So., 55410
37.
Bradley Anderson, 5435 Chicago Ave, 55419
38.
Ray Waldorf 9159 Penn Ave.
39.
Robert Hamscomb, 4949 16th Ave So. 55417
40.
Neil Ostlund (Northwestern Bell)
41.
Orville Thurman, 123 E. 59th St. #305, 866 -0141, 55419
42.
Cindy Richards 901 E. 77th St. #38, 55423
43.
Bill Gauger, 6417 22nd Ave. 869 - 6026, 344 -5049
44.
John Oxborough, 6101 Oliver 55419 725 -2863
45.
Donald Mindrum, 5061 9 mile Creek Circle, 831 -2019
46.
Wondra Realty 9139 Lyndale
47.
Bill Voe 22340 Bracketts Rd, Excelsior, 55331
48.
Tom Sexton, 6644 Park Ave So.
49.
Thomas and Cheryl Krats 4500 Nawadaha Blvd 55406
50.
Terry Mahoney 12931 Portland Burnsville, 55337
51.
Mrs. Robert Revier 6932 10th Ave.
52.
Richard Dvorak 6833 Sheridan
53.
Fred Habegger 6740 Blaisdell ave
54.
Patty Sherbourn 3429 23rd Ave. So 55407
r
55. Arlin McArthur 6444 Emerson Avenue
56. Evelyn Allen 6504 Standish
57. Dr. Edward Corazalla 2412 West 66th Street
58. Tom Shehan 10985 Hyland Avenue Eden Prairie, 55344
59. John Carter 3345 Donald Avenue Eagan, 55121
60. Mrs. Harold T. Poehler 6525 Standish
61. Wayne Gavin 7509 Oakland Avenue
62. John Lallak 8131 Pillsbury Avenue 55420
63. W. C. Klein 866 -9105
64. Gordon Kevitt 6517 Standish
65. Ronald Long, 6508 Standish
66. Cathy Vesey 3216 Cedar Avenue South 55407
67. James Joubert 7232 Newton Avenue South
68. Tom Krats 4500 Nawadaha Blvd, 55406
69. Marjorie Haas 667 E. 79th Street
70. Carol Stier 7229 18th Avenue South
71. Kenny White 4604 Columbus Avenue South
72. Steve Salseg 3008 West 74th Street
73. Goerge Thompson 6513 Standish
74. Gordon Kevitt 6517 Standish
75. Harold Poehler 6525 Standish
76. Joseph Suasen 6529 Standish
77. Rickie Hesse 6520 23rd Avenue
78. James Liermann 6405 22nd Avenue
79. Kevin Kroepein 6409 22nd Avenue
80. William Gauger, Jr. 6417 22nd Avenue
81. Nancy Wedin 6421 22nd Avenue
82. Charles Oberfoell 6444 Standish
83. Iona Reed 6412 22nd Avenue
84. Joseph Regan 6432 Standish
85. Michael Blank 6425 Standish
86. William Diederichs 6429 Standish
87. Lavonne Bender 6501 Standish Avenue South
88. Deil Gustafson 6100 Summit Drive North
89. David Kramer 6412 Standish
90. B. T. & A. Construction 3401 Colfax
91. Fred Habegger 6740 Blaisdell
92. David Ross 611 Anson Street, Simi Valley, CA
93. Frank Garrison 4420 Garrison Lane
94. Edward Larson 6511 11th Avenue
95. Carl McBride Richfield State Agency, 6625 Lyndale Avenue
96. Mrs. Martin Hoffman 7710 Penn Avenue Apt. 24
97. Gregory Walden 6315 Newton
98. Rick Lines 12 South East Sydney Place Minneapolis 55414
99. Charles Jacobson 6532 21st Avenue
100. Donald LaPlant 6528 21st Avenue
101. Donald Foell 6524 21st Avenue
102. Robert Fuller 6520 21st Avenue
103. James Johnson 6516 21st Avenue
104. Steven Omlie 6511 -13 21st Avenue
105. Floyd Krueger 6516 22nd Avenue
106. Thomas Kudrle 6520 22nd Avenue
107. Dennis Glade 6532 22nd Avenue
108. Mark Morrison 6536 22nd Avenue
109. Robert Kenmet 6525 22nd Avenue
110. Ronald Long 6508 Standish
111.' Ashton Waggoner 6501 22nd Avenue
r
112. George Thompson 6513 Standish
113. Joseph Sausen 6529 Standish
114. •Rickie Hesse 6520 23rd Avenue
115. James Liermann 6405 22nd Avenue
116. Iona Reed 6412 22nd Avenue
117. Michael Blank 6425 Standish
118. William Diederichs 6429 Standish
119. Michael Gudmunson 6437 Standish
120. Darcie Edwards 6445 Standish
121. John Orfield 6434 23rd Avenue
122. Robert France 6328 21st Avenue
123. Scott Coughlin 6321 21st Avenue
124. Dennis Dean Scott 6325 21st Avenue
125. Robert Jurkovski 6333 21st Avenue
126. Gene Hubert 6337 21st Avenue
127. William Stadelman 6349 22nd Avenue
128. Richard Pappin 6336 22nd Avenue
129. Wallace Dupree 6324 22nd Avenue
130. Fred Erickson 6325 22nd Avenue
131. Theodore Heikkila 6333 22nd Avenue
6519 - 6535 21st Av--nue South
Lots 5 - 9, Block 5
Minii�um acceptable bids:
$7,000 $7,000
$7,000 $6,500
$7,000
0
Mary Anderson:
6519 21st Avenue
6523 21st Avenue
6527 21st Avenue
6531 21st Avenue
6535 21st Avenue
Balmer Construction
*Charles Waiss
Page one
PROPOSALS FOR NJ--,,'Iq FORD TOTIN LOTS
Reviewed by New Home CommitLee
May 8, 1.978
PI-Ircliase
Pri
rice
1$7,050.00
Statement
Yes
Description
Four-bedroom
Site
Plan
x
Es L,
Market
Vajue
Construction
Schedule
Yes
Security
Deposit
p urch,-�iqe
'Aqreement
Yes
Notes
did not meet criteria for
49,950
200.00
1,040 sq, ft.
multi,-family dwelling
$7,050.00
Yes
Four-bedro*om
960 sq. ft.
x
52,300
Yes
200.00
Yes
($7,050.00
Yes
Four-bedroom
1,040 sq. ft.
x
49,950
Yes
200.00
I Yes
$7,050.00
Yes
Four-bedroom
960 sq. ft.
x
52,300
Yes
200.00
Yes
$7,050.00
Yes
Four-bedroom
�$35,250.00
1,,040 sq. ft.
x
49,950
Yes
200.00
Yes
$34,500.00
Yes
Two-12 unit
x
225,000
Yes
200.00
None
per building
six - one bedroom
Buildings
(24 units)
two - two bedroom
$39,425.00
Yes
Five double
x
80,000
Yes
1,000.00
Yes
bungalows
each
two-bedroom
1,040 9q. ft.
(10 units)
Purchase
. Prioe
6521 Standish Avenue
Lot 6, Block 7
Minimum bid: $6,500.
Steve Rosen /8 , 5UO , 0O
}1azn Anderson
Charles Waiss
*Larry Stein
6413 22nd Avenue
Lot 4, Block 13
Minimum bid
*Steve Rosen
Thompson & Touaagez
/6/500.00
6/850.00
l0,lUO
3'5O0.00
^ Jeanne Gauger h0'10I.00
Page two
Reviewed by New Dome CommitCue
May 8, 1.978
State
.men t
Yes
Description
Three-bedra)rr
P la 11
\7(l I
)rchasn_
Second choice (only made
1148 sq. ft.
x
48,000
None
200,00
Yes
one security deposit to
be applied toward which-
ever lot)
Yes
Four-bedroom
1,040 sq. ft
x
49,500
Yes
200.00
yes
Yes
Three-bedroom
1,100 sp. ft
x
55,000
Yes
200.00
yes
Yes
Three-bedroori
..
1,340 sq. ft,
x
44,900
Yes
200.00
Yes !to
be moved from 7944 13th
1,148 -sq. ft
x
48,000
None
200.00
Yes
first choice of three
Yes
Three-bedroom
lots submitted by Rosens
938 sq. ft.
NU
46,600
Yes
200.00
Yes
site plan will be sup-
plied later-was stolen
Yes
None
No
NA
None
200.00
Yes
Proposal did not meet
it,
criteria for single-family
idwellinq
1
6413 22n(I Avenue (coat. )I
Mary Andorson
Charles Tvaiss I
6431 Standish Avenue
Lot 9, Block 14
Minimum bid: $6,500
R & S Realty
*Mary Anderson 1-,
Charles Waiss 1(
6332 22nd Avenue
Lot 16, Block 19
Minimum bid: $3,750
Mary Anderson 14
*Charles waiss 16
Page three
PROPOSALS FOP, NEW J__`ORD T01IN LOTS
Reviewed by New Iloinc., Committee
May 8, 1-978
P(ircliase
3,050,00
S ta temen t
Yes
.
Descri ption
Four-bedroom
� 1 tc -1
'3'
Plan
Est.
M �i i. I'
- IeL
�7c. l u e
Cons L-rj_jcL i,()n
Schecjulc
Securj �
Deposit y
PPrice
Agreement t
TIotes
1,040 sq, ft
x
51f400
Yes
20.0.00
Yes,
x,300.00
Yes
Three-bedroo.Tr
1,100 sq. ft
x
55,000
Yes
200.00
Yes
,605.00
Yes
Three-bedroaT
x
49,950
Yes
200.00
IYes
1,008 sq. ft
'050,00
Yes
Four-bedroom
1,040 sq. ft
x
49,950
Yes
200.00
Yes
,800.00
Yes
Three-bedroorr
x
55,000
Yes
200.00
Yes
1,100 sq. ft
,550.00
Yes
Three-bedroolT
x
45,300
Yes
200.00
Yes
900 sq. ft.
,000.00
Yes
Three-bedroom
x
55,000
Yes
200.00
Yes
1,100 sq. ft
61
L(
M_,
M�
CI
6`
LC
St
NC
*ME
Cr,
Page four
PROPOSALS FOR NEW F'ORD TOTIN LO'PS
Reviewed by New Home Committee
May 8, 1978
Notes
Site plan will be
provided later - stolen
Third choice
Site plan would be
drawn after moving
inspection completed
LU
Ptircliaso
PL-ice
StEtOMCnt-,
Description
Sit(-,
Pla.11
MarJ'
:Ct
ConsLri.jctj.on
Sociiri 1--y
Va.lue
Schedule
Deposit
Aqreement
,33 22nd Avenue
)t 8, Block, 6
nimLim bid: $6,500
7,100.00
Yes
Three-bedroori
x
45,900
Yes
200.00
Yes
�O_Innsor_, & T-onsager
938 sq. ft.
ry Anderson
5,500.00
Yes
Four-bedroom
1,040 sq. ft.
x
47,950
Yes
200.00
Yes
[arles Waiss
6,800.00
Yes
Three-bedroom
1,100 sq. ft
x
55,000
Yes
200.00
Yes
16 Standish Avenue
I
t 19, Block 6
DIM= bi3: $6,503
8,000.00
Yes
Three-bedroom
eve Rosen
1148 sq. ft.
x
48,000
None
200.00
Yes
uyen Sanh
6,500.00
Yes
Four-bedroom
1,542 sq. ft
x
53,000
Yes
200.00
Yes
ry Anderson
7,050.00
Yes
Four-bedroom
960 sq. ft.
x
52,300
Yes
200.00
Yes
arles Waiss
6,825.00
Yes
Three-fDedroon
x
55,000
Yes
200.00
Yes
1,100 sq. ft.
Notes
Site plan will be
provided later - stolen
Third choice
Site plan would be
drawn after moving
inspection completed
LU
°
'
'-- - - -
*
w
^
c
PROPOSALS FOR NEW FORD TOWN LOTS
Reviewed by New Done ConuniKee
May O/ I978
[
�
|
Purchase
Statement
Description
�i�e
Est
ioo
porch
P^.^^
vql.ue
schedule
DePOSit
Agreement
6228 22nd Avenue
I�`t 17, Block 19
|
hioin)om bid; $5,750
(
4,550,00
Yes
s
45'
Yes
200,00
![eo
Mary Anderson
Charles Waiss
6,000,00
3[os
x
55,000
Yes
2Q000
Yes |
6329 21at Avenue
Lot 8, Block 19
|
Koimum bid: $7,000
71500,00
Yes
r"`~" units
x
49 000
Yes
200 ,0O
addend
Yea
__j____ ____
each
lazv Anderson
8,050.00
Yes
Four-
}c
51000
Yes
200,00
Yes;
1,040 a
r /J` ft
~
1harIeo Waisa
7,300.00
Yes
Three-bedroon
x
HMO
Yes
200vUU
Yes
.
1,100 sq. ft
�
'
`'. |
|
|
|
|
Page five
Notes
-----------
proposal did not meet
criteria for single-family
dwelling
LU,
r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 147
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit - Wendy's Old Fashioned
Hamburgers, Inc. - 6500 Lyndale Avenue
Background
On November 22, 1977, a request for a special use permit to allow con-
struction and operation of a Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburger Restaurant at
6500 Lyndale Avenue was brought before the planning commission for its consid-
eration. At that meeting, the commission deferred action on the request for special
use permit to allow the Residential Impact Neighborhood Group (RING) and the
Commercial Improvement Committee (CTC) to review and comment on the proposal.
The committees reviewed the proposal and requested a concept plan for the entire
property to determine how the Wendy's proposal would fit into that plan.
Wendy's submitted a site plan for review in November, 1977. The staff
reviewed the site plan and noted that the plan did not conform to city zoning ordin-
ance, the comprehensive plan, the L /H /N redevelopment plan, the public improve-
ment plan, the urban design guidelines, the off - street parking ordinance, or the
health ordinance of the city. Subsequently, the staff met with Mr. Robert Hoffman
and Mr. William Sievers, representing Wendy's, and reviewed the deficiencies in
the site plan. The staff also suggested possible alternatives to correct those defic-
iencies. At that meeting, the Wendy's representatives agreed to develop a new site
plan which would correct the deficiencies noted in the original site plan. The
representatives of Wendy's also agreed to develop a concept plan for the Strom
property as a whole.
Wendy's submitted a revised site plan to the city on April 19, 1978.
The staff also received a concept plan for the entire Strom property on that date.
The staff met with Mr. Robert Hoffman again on April 20, 1978 and discussed
the new material which was submitted for the staff review. The RING and CIC groups
met on April 24, 1978 for the purpose of reviewing the Wendy's plan and the concept
plan which had been re- submitted. On April 25, 1978 the planning commission re-
viewed the new proposal for operation of a Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburger
r
Council Letter No. 147 -2- May 22, 1978
Restaurant at 6500 Lyndale Avenue.
Exhibits
The following exhibits are attached and will be referred to throughout
this letter:
Exhibit A - Site Plan
Exhibit B - Redevelopment Plan
Exhibit C - Comprehensive Plan
Exhibit D - Zoning Ordinance Conditions
Exhibit E - Letter from Wendy's Old
Fashioned Hamburgers, Inc.
Proposa 1
The applicants are proposing to construct a new restaurant, plaza area,
and trash storage area on the site now occupied by "Big Mikes ". The existing
structure is proposed to be demolished.
The proposed restaurant is a sitdown hamburger speciality restaurant. A
supplemental car order and drive through window is being proposed for a location
on the south side of the building. The site will include off - street parking, handi-
capped parking, landscaping and the dedicaticn of a 20 foot landscape easement
along Lyndale Avenue. On site storm water drainage is being proposed also.
Physical Characteristics
S ite:
Parking Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Prea:
Land Use:
Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan:
L /H /N Redev. Plan:
Staff Findings
26,000 square feet
21,100 square feet (34 parking spaces)
2,240 square feet (40' x 56') 72 seats
800 square feet
Site - general commercial (existing fast food
restaurant)
Surrounding - general commercial
Site - general commercial
Surrounding - general commercial
Central business district high /medium density
Entertainment area
The proposed restaurant site plan was reviewed by the staff using the foll-
owing criteria:
1. Conditions for Issuing a Special Use Permit (3.33, subd. 4 and
3.41 , subd t 1)
2. Comprehesnive Plan
0 Council Letter No. 147 -3- May 22, 1978
3. Redevelopment Plan
4. Urban Design Guidelines of the L/H /N Redevelopment Plan
5. Parking Regulations
Tra ff is
The proposed use will generate approximately 259.44 ADT. Both Lyndale
Avenue and 65th Street are being reconstructed to handle additional traffic over
what they now carry. The construction will involve the upgrading of the Lyndale
and 65th Street intersection, installation of a mid -block pedestrian crossing on
Lyndale, and a pedestrian System adjacent to the site on Lyndale. Once
completed, the carrying capacity of Lyndale Avenue will be 12,000 ADT, and
the carrying capacity of 65th Street will be 12, 000 ADT.
The existing volume of traffic on Lyndale Avenue is 11,800 ADT south of
the site and 14,7000 north of the site. The projected volumes, which include a
new restaurant in this area, are 14,800 ADT south of the site and 16,300 north of
the site. With the improvements to the public streets, the proposed use as
designed will not create undue traffic hazards or congestion.
The proposed parking layout and capacity is sufficient to handle the
projected volume of traffic on the site. The developer is proposing to provide
34 parking spaces with 24 foot driving aisles, and 50 foot clear areas from the
intersection.
The Site
The proposed restaurant has been designed to provide adequate provisions
for avoiding glare, fumes, dust and storm water drainage in accordance with the
L /H /N Design Guidelines. These guidelines require specified lighting, landscaping
and pavement treatment as well as general building and sign aesthetic treatment.
When reviewed with the developer's entertainment guide, the proposed development
conforms to the city's adopted comprehensive plan and the L /H /N redevelopment
plan.
Section 3.41, subdivision 5 of the zoning ordinance requires that a special
land use cannot be detrimental to the neighborhood, safety, or health or general
welfare. One of the issues which arises in connection with this proposal, because
the proposal is in a redevelopment area, is the need to coordinate this low density
development with the development of the rest of the Strom property (the south part
of the L /H /N entertainment center). Goals of the L /H /N and comprehensive plan
refer to joint use of parking, integrated uses and maximizing the intensity of use
of the land. The staff has received a concept plan showing that the remainder of
the Strom property could be developed with higher intensity uses in such a manner
that the total property, including the proposed Wendy's development would meet
' Council Letter No. 147 -4- May 22, 1978
the intensity goals of the L /H /N plan and the comprehensive plan.
In accordance with council policy, the staff has asked that the applicant
provide the city with a Certificate of Survey and executed easements for lands-
caping along Lyndale Avenue and a portion of 65th Street. The staff has also
asked that the applicant provide the city with an agreement holding the city
harmless for any damages which could occur within the easements because of
the developer's negligence. The applicant has agreed to provide the city with
the Certificate of Survey, executed agreements and the hold harmless agreement,
although we have not received the satisfactorily executed landscape easements
yet.
Staff Recommendation
Because the staff has found that the proposal would be in compliance
with the L /H /N redevelopment plan and the comprehensive plan and meets the
conditions for a special use permit," the staff recommends issuance of the special
use permit. It is recommended that the special use permit be issued with the
following stipulations;
1. That satisfactory recordable executed easements for a 20 -foot
wide landscape easement along Lyndale Avenue and a 10 -foot
by 10 -foot landscape easement at the intersection of 65th
Street and Lyndale Avenue are submitted to the city;
2. That a satisfactory agreement holding the city harmless for any
damages which occur within the easements which are due to the
developer's negligence is submitted to the city.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission considered this request for a special use permit
at their May-9, 1978 meeting. Mr. Hoffman, representing both Wendy's and Mr.
Gordon Strom, appeared before the planning commission. He indicated to the
commission that Mr. Strom would sign an easement agreement for the necessary
landscape easements if the special use permit were issued. The easement
would also contain the necessary hold harmless agreement.
The commission voted 6 to 2 to recommend to the city council that the
special use permit be issued with the following stipulations;
1 . That satisfactory recordable executed easements for a 20 -foot
wide landscape easement along Lyndale Avenue and a 10 -foot
by 10 -foot landscape easement at the intersection of 65th Street
and Lyndale Avenue are submitted to the city.
Council Letter No. 147 -5- May 22, 1978
2. That a satisfactory agreement holding the city harmless for
any damages which occur within the easements which are due
to the developer's negligence is submitted to the city.
Respectfully submitted,
Zo,�f� S�.
Wayne S . Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc; Planning and Redevelopment Director
Public Works Director
R
w
� is •••
N
•
•
ENTERTAINMENT DEVELOPMENT
� GUIDE
for the G. Strom property
Date: 4.13-78
K "N
Z
0
w
A
LYNDALE AV. SOUTH
WENDY'S �I ,
N Illustrative Site Plan �
Date: 4.13-78
"VVI E INI DY 9 S
W Planting Plan
nqtp- A.I.q.7R
m
3
wi
0
0 SOUTH
3 LYNDALE AV.
"VVI E INI DY 9 S
W Planting Plan
nqtp- A.I.q.7R
0
O
O
rt
N
CL
CD
LYNDALE AV. SOUTH
WEN ®Y'S 61
Lighting Plan
0
natP- A-11-7P "o,4X ".'
'A ' for unlondinc, or similar activities.
3, 33. U B "MCU7 A_T; OJOC FOR ';C-2": Cl's III AL C01.17? :Cis,'•, DISMITOT.
Subdiv lion 1. P_o-rmir.Led _Uses. in a General Oour,►crci,ll district, unle:;s othen11*51e
provided in this chn Ater, ttic fol lo-rillg uses are permitted:
(1) 6ny'use permitted in 'an "." district or an "NI R"' district upon compliance
with the procedural rcciuiremc-nts for !,uch district ; irovided that no one - family,
tlw- family or multiple - family dwelling shall be conntructed in this, district Ilithout
first- obtaining a special use permit therefor in accordance with provisions of
Section 3.41. ,
•(2) Any commercial usd permitted in a "C -1" district, subject to the procedural
rer?uircments contained in'this section.
(3) Retail stores and shops, including soda fountains,
Financial institutions, telephone and telegr..pll offices, messenger offices
and professional offices.
(5). Carpenter, funiture repairing and upholstery shops, book bindinb -shops,
dress making shops, silos repairing or dyeing shoos, ne- .- per and job prilntino
establishments, electrical, tin:mithing, plumbing, decorating shops, self service
laund -flies and outdoor advertisir.- signs.
fv) Tree trimming -s:'.rVi.ces provided that such services do not include storav3
accumulation or l :eep Lip O•' Wood Or tree trim -min --s On the premises.
(7) Accessory u -sc-s and structures incide -ltal to any perl:litted use, but not
including the open ;; orags of equipment or l:laterials.
Subd. 2. Uses by Special Use Permit. The foll.o -31141" uses shall be permitted only
upon the procurement of a special use permit pursuant to Cection 3,41:
(1) Undertaking CJLablis11 :cnt s.
(2) Any drive -in buoir.ess where 1;�_-opl.c are served in auto ^obi Iles.
(3) Automobile camps and courts.
(4) llotels, motels, restaurants, cafes, gasoline -service stations, service
station stoles, public garages, car sales lots, and theaters. No service station
may be converted into a. station store wit"Ibut a s-pecial use per :.lit for sL:Ch use
issued ?.9,l occordance with Section 3.41 of thl.s coda. (1.9,73 -21). 2- 11 -%L }.
(5) Other business UJ,.G Which are deterillined by the Council to be of the
rime general character as the uses tnUmcrated ill t}lis Section and u'llich will not
be.obnoxious or detrirlenLal to the area in uhich they would be located.
Subd. 3. Re„ ulatl_ons Pi:- 'l.c ^ ^.t.11ln to Gasol ;1 'erv:.CC Sl�lil -ells. ILlblic Cary :-cs nd Car
Sales Lots. A special use permit for .1 gasoline service statl.on, public €;a raCc or
a .car salc!s lot shall not oe 1,ranted ual.ecs Cie council finds that the I_roposed use
vi11 be in substantial compliance with the following standards:
'(a)' The use site will not abut a tot which is in an "R" district.
For the purposes of this paragraph, a lot which merely adjoin.- the use site at one
corner will not be deemed to abut the site.
(l5)• The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic connesti.on by
"On Of the _turning movements which vehicles tjould make in entering or leaving chc
.^,i.tC.
(c). l,lo driveway, at the point it the property lisle of the sil•c till be
within 40 feet of in inters ectioll. All "intersection" as USed ill LhiS p11F1�,1 ":11)[1 f.1C :il1S
the point of interSecti.on of the c .tended curb liner, if the curbs on the near side of
the si.tc, and monsurcmcnt sllzlll be :dolls; such ext tided curt) lilies.
Lv 2..11 -14
.�1� _
or similar atLcnti.on- j.;sL-. or villiLiliLl - obscuri'l. V1CCs :.n t:;c
area in front of. bui.iding�..ctback Lines. k,
(e) The Minimum frontage on any street will. he 120 feet and the
minimum area- of the site will be 12,000 Square feet for a station with four
••pumps or less; and stations with more pumps• will have sufficient additional .
frontage area to provide equivalent and sufficient space for servicing
vehicles, for •off-st_reet parking;, for safe vehicular approaches into the
station, and for good visibility for pedestrians and drivers.
(f) No driveway will. be flared outward on the boulevard in such a
way as to encroach upon the boulevard of adjacent, property.
(g) The station or garage will comply with the off - street- parking,
sign construction and other regulations of the city.
(h) Any required buffer or screening area will be so- constructed as
to obstruct headlight beads of automobiles on the station property from
beaming; onto adjacent- residential . property.
(a.) -Pump islands will not be so close to street or adjacent- property
lines as to create the 111:eli_Ilood of encroachu«ent by vehicles upon street
right --of -way, sidewalk areas or adjacent- property.
(j) Only one permanent detached ground display sign, perdcstal type may
be erected on the street frontage at or near- the property line adjacent
to the street, except that if the frontage oa t1 :e. "sL; :eC't :.ia in .c :�cc :s of
.150 feet, two such signs may be alto .ed by the council on sbc:I frontage,
subject to any other applicable sign regulation.
All exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated
as not to be a nuisance to adjacent prbparti.es.- K
.(1} If the station or. garage is to be located in a shopping center or
other integrated develop-m.cnt, it will be in - architectural harC :oily with the
rest of the center or ddvelojr:ent.
(m) The station or garage will not provide for the outC'oor Opc. c tion
of lubrication equ'i.prent, hydraulic lift-3 Or service pits, or the outdoor
display Of t,ercha,�idise; but tlhe c'uts1.dc underground storage of basoline
and other petroleum: products betN-;een pumps, or the tc-inporary display of
merchandise within 4 feet of the station building; is permitted.
• (n) If the station or g;arc3c is not to be located on a county road or
state hig;11 ay, it shall not be operated bete :een t:he Hours of 11 :00 p.cl•
and 6:00 a.m, of the following day :.
(o) If the site 'is at an intersection, provi-si.on'vill be made for all
unobstructed area on the site, adja.cctlt to and wi*Lhi.n 50 feet of the inter -
secticn, free of vehicles, si. -n s (ot:her. than a pedestal_ si.g n), displays
or other materials which tend to obstruct intersection visi.bi.lity.
Subd. 4. Rerulat:i.onn Re',at_nf; to Ilotel.s, Motels, Restaurant-1 'Ind Cafes
A special use .permit shall not be granted for a IIOL'CI., motel, r.-estatiralit
or cafe unless the council finds that the proposed use will be in substantial
compliance with the fol.l.owill" standards:
(a) The use will not cre. ^te undue traffic hazard-- or traffic congestion
either on the public streets adjacent- to the site or on the parking; areas
on or adjacent to the site or on streets adjiccnt to the site unto which
traffic to or from the: site is channeled.
(b) Adequate provision l:1.11 be made, through the use. of buildiDL set -
backs, buffer areas, screenin -, and exterior treatment: or placement of the
building on the site two avoid noise, glnre, fumes, dust, and any other
cources of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent: propei- tics,
E. 5/23/70
I-
I
a,.
OLD FASX4XIDn7ED
IN
Iq
November 15,1977
Mayor & City Council
Richfield City Hall
6700 Portland
Richfield, Mn. 55423
Honorable Members:
1.
Wendy's of Minnesota with eight restaurants in Minnesota is
petitioning the City of Richfield to establish a Tliendy's
Old Fashioned Hamburger restaurant.
We are a family sit -down restaurant with:
(a) seating for 72 -82 patrons
(b) trays for those eating inside
(c) free coffee refills
(d) carpeted dining room
(e) trash recepticales out of sight
(f) meal policing maintenance programs
Employment opportunities for the Youth of Richfield
(a) will employ 30 -40
(b) will work closely with High School Counselors
regarding W.E. - C.E.P. Program
(c) - Parents Comments- "The training discipline and res-
ponsibility given our children at Wendy's very much assists our
efforts in raising the children to adulthood."
Community Involvement
A company cannot simply insist that it is interested in
the community. It must support its words with action. Wendy's
does strongly identify with each community.
EXAMPLE:
A. Knollwood Plaza Merchants Association
B. West Suburban Chamber of Commerce,
P.T.Cook,Director
C. 7 -Hi Merchants Association
D. White Bear Chamber of Commerce
E. Austin Chamber of Commerce
C & C IN VI: ST%IF-NTS, I\(,. ; 1301 S "f., st n,i I I IA, IIOI'KI \S. NI INN ISO r 55343 , 612.933 -0233
OX-ID r'ASMXOX-L7ED
November 15,1977
Mr. Richard C.Krier
Director of Planning
City of Richfield
6700 Portland
Richfield, Mn. 55423
- I Dear Dick:
To confirm our discussion on November 10th and loth kindly
note the following:
(a) Wendy's will bear our proportionate share of
the cost of burying the overheads.
(b) The Wendy's Pylon will be painted to match the
tone of the brick on the outside of the building.
i.e. the color will conform with our overall
i E-G--color.
i
Yours Si.nae -1y,
P ter T.Cook
resident
c.c. Mr. W.Kolsrud
C & C INNTSTNIFNTS, INC. i 1301 ST.. st'1T1' 11 IA, llO1'KT \S. %IINNFSOTA 55343 , 612- 933 -0233
am xswx.is , \�— ��../ ��
L<— -I
F--7,
-W� u
tW-
0M,
P, a� aLj
as
IMS
111a
£1. 61' JD nuDr !o Cop 4191 *!44 plo1i431i jo A+la o4a A9 poadopo
a.Aejg6no,AOy4 LeLAajJe AOCPW
- - - --
:NOI1V111OdSNVIL,
9L4LLIOeJ L2uoLyn1l4sul a4enLAd
Jo `OLLgnd -LSenb `OLLgnd Jay40
salagoangd
- --
palelaayouJnyo Jo sayOanyD
- -
S[OOgOS OLLgnd
--- --
aOeds uado pue sued OLLgnd
-----
x
i;
ASM1112Vd
A11NnwwoD
s�!un AjIWD; otAl
JO aL6uLs y4LM aLgtaPdmoO
kaossaooe
M0�
LeLJuaplSad
�LlWJ
sasn pup spun
aL6uLs
AI!WD} ONy JO SLLMl aL6ULS
- saaogs a.A2Mp.Aey `6nap `XAa:)o.Aq
Mol
ea,AV 6uLddoyS
0
a3UaLUaAUO0
•sasn X'Jossanp
y6LH
aLdLIlnW
pa4eLa.A ggLm s4lun aLdLILnW
•sasn LeLa4snpuL
pa4UaLJO g0J2asal pue jy6LI
wnLpaW
L2LJjsnpuI
IDIOJOWWO3 a ,uaruanuoo
pooyJOg461OU y6�au pue `sasnoyuMOl
wnLpaW
asp pu2i paxLW
`s6uillemp aldi4lnw `s6uLLLaMp
,�LLw2; aL6uLs 40 UOL42ulgw)
s6uillemp
alditInw pue `SaL4LLlO2J
LeuoL4eaaOaJ `LeanlLnO pa4lWLL
` ` ulsnLe L sassa q
asp Pup paxLW
aOlnaas Put) bUlddoq s uosLJ2dwoO
wnLp8W /46LH
40 la4sla
LLews `SjUawgSLLge4sa 6uLIe0
ssauLsng Leajuao
pue 4UawuL2jJa4Ua `L2LOaawwoO
Llelaa `aOL ;3o So UOLIeULgwoo
s6uLLLaMp aLdL4inw put?
l�DjBJ
`@4UaLAO
`Lelajsnpul pa�ualao yOaeasaa
q3
wnLpaW /y6LH
asH Pup paxLW
pue JO LL `LeuoljnjljSUL
`aOLI3o SO Uo « 2uLgwoD
LoiOJawwoo
1I0481 pue `Le60L3ngL4SUL
`Lalow 'La}oy `L2LJjsnpul
y6LH
asp pue] paxLW
yOaeasaJ `aOLJSO `s6uLLLaMp
aLdtglnw SO U014eulgwng
sasn lodlauljd
A+Isuop
uol +dijasap
,isn GNV1
legy p jo A412 ay} .lo;
ua d 4uawdo awa p SAISUG a ajdwo3
3 -
J
i
f T•
r Y
�••,•5... fir' �:,Fr� r.• �.••
.YT•iij1L"Y •
v.rr..
JJ
` #
�Z-H
2 EL U) .
fr
r
�'cT7M::`Eis.�tn ti�ot -- ..- a .* g'�r r: s1" a � � j • °tia�,y._; .. � - ,t°^'iYf _ >,c ..
?�'T.l,�''y�... 1�_�/Vt. -?:A �pi�� if,._ ,�. _ Rp"'Y w t .•�d�. ;:C .. �. ". y _ �... . - - .�!
4'it Fi �'i '.1 CF'' tLi} E'R i l�°l 'P RJ_I ?.11 a "{,•+_ °'Li d1 C2..
- .- �'-'.�.'� -�-,;� � '�'4rir � ^�► v.� � a .,f�- t� u, .� �I I �17��_3. r6 3 � ty-�'- �_.g. , -- _ _
-,. •ter �.. "� .'��. � � t "'C'st3 �t .r .lf.: Y iw 4!- � y+. i. -._ " -•�
- T~„�1K'"3'" ;,a^'i {"."�'_i '+f ,� 'b°'L��fj-�, er--. �}er -t �.r ; '* •r�} ii �i it 'i�R,- ,�� h ?� 1�` �}' -_"�_ .. , '.. _
.,7.j �ta`°t•P' •�. �t, ZV �r:.a� .-- _% �„ -tom•'" i`viG.: .
tz
rZ
�� •yam r � "� `5 ~Y� - _ J � � �•4 � �•`4R., y�V�'"� � ..
�. � (�i � �•. __.. _ J �,r�•��-:._� cam- c-;� -i 7' c�t�.�. �__�.! l� - - - - .
- � o
UJ
F-
�__ ooZ LLz i'9
/ `t
CO
o O
i_
�o
0 0 SLL N
so;
li
. S r ..a-•-•rsrr� • • �r`r c I
i�s :f.•
..........;
cQ
�, `�� � Q ._ .•+- y , /� e�\ � {fir" :�1ti : ,�,��\• i _J` � � 1S _
.i; W (� •k I v
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 146
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Public Hearing on Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
The purpose of this council letter is to recommend that the city council
adopt three amendments to the Richfield Comprehensive Plan. A public hearing
on these proposed amendments has been scheduled for the May 22, 1978 city
council meeting. The proposed changes are as follows:
1. Amendment to the Goals and Policies Section of the Compre-
Plan
The planning commission annually reviews and updates the
goals and policies of the comprehensive plan as the first step
in rleveloping the long -range capital improvement program.
The intent of this procedure is to insure that the city's goals
and policies are current and workable and result in an effective
ca p ita i improvement program.
The commission reviewed proposed rewordings and additions to
the comprehensive plan at their April 11 and April 25 meetings.
At the May 9, 1978 meeting, the planning commission voted to
recommend to the city council that the proposed rewording be
included in the goals and policies section of the comprehensive
plan.
2. Amendment to Expand the Size of New Ford Town Park
This amendment is necessary to allow purchase of an isolated
residential lot located at 6445 -21st Avenue, which is bordered
by New Ford Town Park on the north and east, by 21st Avenue
on the west and 65th Street on the south. There is an existing
single family residence on the site which will be moved to a
Council Letter No. 146 -2- May 22, 1978
suitable vacant residential lot within the area. The acqusition
of this property will result in a more regularly shaped park, will
create more space for park activities, and will allow more efficient
use of the park space.
3. Amendment to Incorporate an Entertainment Development Guide
Dated April 13, 1978 for the Area in the Vicinity of 65th Street
and Lvndale Avenue South
At the April 25, 1978 planning commission meeting, the commission
reviewed an Entertainment Development Guide dated April 13, 1978
for the area in the vicinity of 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue. This
guide was presented to the planning commission in conjunction with
a special use permit request for a Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburger
Restaurant at 6500 Lyndale Avenue. The purpose of this guide is
to show that the L /H /N entertainment area developmental intensity
goals could be met if the proposed Wendy's Restaurant development
takes place. (The Wendy's Restaurant alone would not meet the
adopted comprehensive plan intensity goals.) The entertainment
development guide submitted does show that the entertainment
area can be developed to meet the intensity goals and other L /H /N
goals with the Wendy's Restaurant at the proposed location. This
amendment to the comprehensive plan is necessary to insure that,
if developed, the Wendy's Restaurant, combined with the rest of
the Strom property development, will be in compliance with the
city's comprehensive plan and L /H /N Redevelopment Plan. If the
comprehensive plan is amended to incorporate the entertainment
development guide, any future development will be required to
comply with the general layout and intensities shown on the
Entertainment Development Guide.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The planning commission held a public hearing on these proposed amend-
ments on May 9, 1978. Subsequent to the May 9, 1978 public hearing on these
proposed amendments, the planning commission passed resolutions adopting the
three amendments to the comprehensive plan, on a 6 -1 vote, with Commissioner
Ulrich abstaining.
Staff Recommendation
A copy of the comprehensive plan goals and policies statement showing
the proposed amendments is attached along with a copy of the Entertainment
Development Guide.
Council Letter No. 146 -3- May 22, 1978
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached ,resolution
approving these proposed amendments to the city's comprehensive plan.
Respectfully submitted,
w '
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc; Planning and Redevelopment Director
P R O P O S E D
GOALS AND POLICY STATEMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
April, 1973
f
GOALS
The following statements express the general goals of the community
in the current and future use and management of ��s- rand- rP4eurePs
land use, transportation, neighborhood conservation, commercial
redevelopment, housing and community facilities.
Land Use
It shall be the goal of the community:
1. To provide for a separate range- of- Neteritlal -la d- 4ses- w =th1�
its- 3�et�ndarles- areas within the community for resi-
dential, commevcial and industrial land uses, and to provide
for public community facilities, neighborhood facilities and
private institutional facilities
2. To #nstire regulate t °at -- A- wse -of -tie landuse
rebates- to -la°d- uses - gists }de - its- k�erders along the bcundari es� -�
the boundaries of the community so that thev are compatible lh
bordering land uses and to work with other jurisdictions to recu-
late land uses along their boundaries which will be compatible
with existing land uses in Richfield.
3. To assure regulate that future development of the land so it
will not adversely affect adjacent land uses.
4. To attempt -to develop a }e °ieui compatibility har�:eUU between
various land uses within the community.
5.6.To protect the property rights of the individual to -t e- extent
that - they -do- net- 11;pi. ge -uro . -t he -prererty- rights- of- et:;ers-
and to realize the public responsibility for community conser-
vation of resources and delivery of public services.
6.5.To preserve and enhance the predominately residential character
of the community.
Populatien Process
It shall be the goal of the co „unity:
1--- To -de texmir:e- an- d »ti°r. - ec�1 =:.1 t�dn- eiee -fer -t e -ee� tr:iit1-
and- to- gu }de- develop °°e::t-toarr.- that -end-
2:- 4 -o»I V1 t _
to- Md1te- Full- rse -t3et:Vi-cee7
d--- Te- tnsarc- that -rd- citizen- c�=- t:^. e- ec: �.�^untty- ts- de »r.�vec:- dt -i:ls
hur.�an- acid- ctt�il- rir,Hts-
4. -- To- mnri -n eC... n'1PIity- Mhi .a
ch- CH- y�.pw.. -t 2C'
V
-2-
5.1.To encourage the active, constructive participation of all
residents in the planning process.- in a way in which both
human and civil rights are protected.
Housing
1. To assure that all persons regardless of race, color, or
creed-have equal opportunity to secure housing of their
choice.
2. To encourage the development of a
at various economic levels and at
which can satisfy the needs for a
and living experiences within the
3. To develeptnentt- housing maintain a
the- aeeeptable minimum standards
and to make available information
ing to buy, rent, or rehabilitate
community.
variety of housing t_7 pes,
various intensities,
variety of life 8t71es
community.
housing codes which provides
ffor housing in the co-mmunit-: ,
and education to those desir
housing units within the
4. To revie a-- and - remise- if- r�eeassa�°y-- aii-eedes -gr d -er°ei �e ees
whieh- azf feet -the -build -ng -a u-.:, atntenftrice- es- strtieceree- -te
insure I e
eeer�e :deal- x3etheds- auai?ab?e- promote the conservation and
rehabilitation of existing housi -a stock.
5. To provide housing opportunities to accomodate and satisfy
the needs of elderly persons .within the co munitv.e.esis� --e:
te- avai? --- themselves- ef- tyese- cuuer°tunit_es-
6. To provide housing opportunities to accmodate and satisfy
the needs of low and moderate into. -e families. witU_n -t °e
eemmu:�ity- e�esir-irig -te- avail- t: e�: se? -ves- ef- t:�ese- appertu:�ities-
Transportation
It shall be the goal of the community:
1. To develep maintain a transportation network wit _; :n- tht± -een-
nunitl to serve a- eewHlete- ry:°:ce-- ---- peteNti:l the various
land uses, to serve local and- in-ern41 transportation needs,
and to develop promote an e:.ternal system linking the community
with centers of activity, commerce, and employment outside
its boundaries.
2. To encourage the development of a variety of modes of travel
to meet the needs of different people.
3. To channel major traffic volumes onto a- li�tec?_nezrheY_e_p��•,e;ya�
arterial and collector streets, and to discourage large traffic
volumes from passing through residential areas.
4. To avoid needless duplication of transportation facilities,
and where possible, reduce t::e amount of land devoted to
transportation systems.
5. To reduce noise and air poll.--ion b< a_a�,�_
pest };gig -? eeiSlat -en -u__,-
in the - 4eveley°"�e12t - -an d- M?s' -oz__ _ -`� ° -e6 °t_°e� -6-
promot:'nca buffer zones bet :-een streets and adjacent land uses
J L i I� r
and by maintaining streets in oc-,= -! oUeratinc ccn. - ition.
and -at- the -lee e l- _uu_n_o�o_sna _ _ -- - _
evert offert ee estee ean_�_ �® _�- _. - ap�iPAP= - - -nt-
6. To premete support the develc--nent o- a mass transit system
at- the- met�epellta� -leuel by ..TC which will provide access
to all areas in Richfield, and which will utilize existing
transportation-rights-of-way wherever possible, rather than
acquiring additional rights- o=- :.-ay.
7. To lrteg°a ��a_ sper° - n f - It, _
elealgn-- whleh- p�evlde _se�_lmn�oL- ed- e- .°e..= a=�en- end-- -=e�°-
tlen- te- aesthetles: improve circ , ��ion and the local street
environment by traffic deli__ - des =fin.
Commercial
It shall be the goal of the core unit, :
1. To eneeurage regulate the de-. elcn-:ent and concentration of
commercial land uses and hier of :igher intensit eAn_Ifte tea_
uses of land ln- aiehfie -d-
2. To create a specialized cnet_al business district to serve as
a focal point for a reasonabl=e ccncentration of civic, resi-
dential, business, cultural, and institutional activities in
the community.
3. To dilsea5urage promote the de,: elo=.ent of commercial uses in
the central business district s °s=terNd- leestiaNS_A- yuyd_ti;N
existine; and other existing co =,e_cial areas.
4. To regulate commercial uses so t -at they will not disrtr t exist-
ing traffic circulation pat-.er :is.
475.To provide for the order!; and s_-ste.,aticc development of com-
mercial activities which provide srecial services to hic,h inton-
sity residential development areas dovel000d under a planned
unit development ordinance, at a:: appropriate scale and locatio7
within such areas.
576.To insure that existing neir :"j-or: :cod sho ^?inch areas remain
reasonably compact, and pro-..4-de service within the scope of a
neighborhood trade area.
ME
Industrial
It shall be the goal of the community:
1. To premete maintain and improve the development of a vel?-
defined existing industrial area.�ithip- t °e- ci -u;- hie ° -�e�?d
permit -a —ease °abie -eepee �t�,ati e -e ` -_na we __ _a' -ae� ci �nment
'' �, -in ivy u } -• A�ee_peFs
#n- rZie::f }e?-d� - and- rel= ake- tA�- burdena_e d d a ..�_..
by- spreadi y- t::e- taX -base-
2. �Pe- eneeeY age_ tAe- deeleee�t_ of_s °eeia?- reseaxeq_A�e,ted - -e
ether - }fi l- uses -w hi eg- we eld- eempleme- nt_ru=4er -`han
eenpete- with- r�eeri�y- y�dt�striai- e'e�eiep°�e�t .
- - - " "- To promote the development of research oriented industry that
will not adversely affect the community.
Communitv Facilities
It shall be the goal of the community:
1. To provide the highest level of community facilities with an
emphasis on the location of facilities, quality of service and
timing of improvement.
z�--- Te- preuide- adequate- eem�u�: ieu- fuei?- �- _es_�- ;it:�Qet -uu�li
e€L erts -by - ether°- gevernments?-- bedies-
3--- Te- a?iQ:-;-*: e-° �e�er- �' evel. ept�y�: t- ef- 4e: .ee?- er- ee°°°�e�:itv-= aei =�t_es
in -the - Eity -aE- Kier_ =e t- pyaue_- aid- e= °eet;ue- e °erei --
tie: �- ef- psa�s- betwee: �- t:' e- aperepriate- =eve?-s- ef- �;everu°;eYt-
2. To review and coordinate co =, unity facility development with
school districts and other governmental jurisdictions for the
purpose of minimizing a duplication of resource expenditures.
473.To develop all public facilities and services at the lowest
possible per capita expenditure while providing services and
facilities which will adequately serve the intended purpose
and be free of excessive maintenance cost.
574.To make major public expenditures according to a capital
improvements plan and budget which establishes priority and
schedules for five years in advance, based upon projections
of need and estimated revenues.
6--- �tj- ��b`;,' iCL'- 2' dr- eei` iSCi'•, �, tiet�- E3tld- e;. «CC�'�•'C- `.�CC-t��"_":�'tC�'��
laNCZSeApe- arCas-
�:-- �e— '`j�'�9`.'i^',.e —c• �r u —�• yt> .ace:. _ ..Lc.i r�_.r�i..- .w4l —iaw�
5. To build facilities %qhich -are attractive, enerav efficient,
and which use - landscagina to improve the cit,, 's imacre.
$--- Te- p�evle?e- sae_sraet_e,�_gs__.�?- ,eerie! s_e- aouAo,�_�oPao� -_A,�
needs-
J � - -Oi aei— es�•1�.'l../1g1Ji1_R —Qii JeA t— \..._ —so G.�G�r1A�l .�� _aAA��i�iGi4— S�au_uGGrYa >mC
JLL£i.ieieil i•_pq_mG�i.,._�.a,•�_aa rlAµv_A� —�.q 9— .e�4a -U R1a i`4- 9r_`u�_v_ J_p=
i�1ei�£1e1d-
19 76.To premate mai taro and i ,rove the Nigh quality of educational
services offered within the co=unitv.
11:7.To development parks and other recreational facilities, based
upon a heirarchy of uses needed by various elements of the
community. -and in sufficent quantity to meet the recreational
reQuirements o- the residents.
1278.To rreuide locate and develop parks =eeated with a reasonably,,
defined service area, wh1— re children will not be required to
cross arterial streets to reach the facilities.
13- - Te- p�evlde- a- eeve�sl= lee - wear- reeNu- _�eg°am- es- reeAeap�enal ..
aetivitles -gat �e4- e- �eye°d- fan -a.a -ems ee___en,ear-- .._� -es
- Evhleh- p�evlee -_ =Ar- the- �;re� -: -:� - deve?- aeme::t-- a:°u -se' =- =e = = - - --
�tent- e €- t�:e -ie�_. _u17
seelal- invel�: -e�e�n
9. To develop fac -li ties %•Jhicn will sati sfv the social needs c-f
the people o Rich-field.
10. To encourage cublic educational institutions to pro.-Ie a e ,`
or mechanism t:.rouc, ^ ^; wi,ich the emerging ro=1s, pl ns and reeds
of the school system can be expressed, taklen into u^^C i:;i any
coordinated t.itn the overall comprehensive guide olan -for the
city.
Hums. -Re seuree -Bt N _oe°°ant
�t- skall- lie -tl�e- ;eel- e=- tye- eew�u,�i�.��
1--- 4e- deWelNp- yrN....4ws_ RHO'-= ae}_- t- i- eJ- `li.•>..eci- ....- s�:t }s °�i: ..- �-- �•- c.�,y-
t�er�a1- and- see�at- :�Her'.s- e�- �-:e -i C' ^`'�";`��'- C'!�- ??��;?,:�•'}'C:
a.
CENTRAL BUSI`IESS DIS --RICT
Land -Use - Co=ercial
It shall be the coal of the eo=unity :
1. To strengt .en and revitalize the L rndale /Hub /icoliet area
as a viable commercial center serving the Ri
: c:if =el.1 and
Sout?1 Minneapolis trade area.
2. To accomodate within_ the Lyndale /Huh /Nicollet are= the war-
ranted additional co::u-lerci al land uses (within their
respective time frames) as indicated in the "De :'el^p•_; e `
Potentials Analysis" prepared by Urban Project'S,'.-Li1c.
3. To promote the strengthening of the strongest existing
retail areas within the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet area.
4. To provide convenient access to commercial areas =or con-
- sumers who prefer not to drive.
Land Use - Residential
It shall be the goal of the cop munity :
1. To create an improved living environment for the residents
of the Lyndale/Hub;``,icollet area.
2. To accomodate wit' ,in the Lynda le /Iiub, /Nicollet area, --e fore-
casted demand for additional d,,elling units.
3. To improve the living environment of the esistinq i]ousiTlg
stock within the Ll,ndale /Hub /Nicollet area.
Environmental
It shall be the goal of the cor.;rnunity:
1. To create a positive nc %.i i; age for tiro Lyndalo:'ii-,'- :icollct
area by i('entifyincl anc, enhancing the di sti:,c-_ive ualiti'; s
of the area and b%, setting appropriate design star:c:ards for
future develo ^ment.
2. To renovate oxisting strong retail commercial esta'olisl:monts
within the area.
3. To establish a "D,2sian for tl,e public1.11:t-Oi -
way to assist in promoting the new iMac:e of tl,o L. nc ale/
Flub /Nicollet area.
4. To develo:) a uni__cd c?csic. , tl =,:: for
Nicollet commercial area.
-7-
5. To encourage Holy angels Acad`mav tc ^air. -n in their site as
a major institutional center and o_ _:n sr-ace amenity.
6. To reduce the level of noise and air borne ~:ollutarts in
the Lyndale /Hub /i,:i co'_let area.
Transportation /Parking
It shall be the goal of the cc ~unite:
1. To create a safe, conuest_on free trans_ ortation syste- to
serve the Lyndale /Hub/NTicollet ar, .
2. To improve the operating characteristics of Lyndale Avenue,
66th Street and Nicollet Avenue.
3. To develop a shared parking concept in order to -minimize
the land area reserved for par:linc.
4. To utilize the transit services alreu _ a =.;ailable to ^e
Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet area to the ...a..-z:u-: e_-tent fs_ '-! e .
5. To encourage access of non - vehicular shoppers.
6. To work towards the building of a ..`z tbound entrance to t::e
Crosstown Highway at Lyndale.
7. To eliminate parr_ing on existing pu lic rici1t- of- �.:av bet;ee^
the curb and buildings.
POLICIES
The following statements represent the proposed general develop-
ment policies for the City of Richfield. Policies are the means
by which the established goals of the coy -^ur_i ty can be achie'-ed.
Following this section, more specific policies have been gre•.:ped
according.to subject.
General
The policies of thefcity are as follows:
1. To maintain that all development sha?? comply with the intent,
if not the letter, or regulations established by the City
Council to.guide and direct the development within the ccm-
munity.
2. To deny rezonings shall unless the proposal
is shown to be in accordance with the intent of the Com- rehen-
sive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
3. To brohibit development proposals which tend to produce undesired
effects to the public health, safety, convenience and general
welfare.
�ill- new- be- permitted-
4. To include as malor factors aesthetic considerations, suc^
architectural style and appearance, site desicn, develoc:-.ent
of open space and the like, in the aces ~t -
ance of all development and redevelopment proposals both puglie
and private.
5. To coordinate municipal, special district, county, metro_col_ta^
and state planning efforts will be coordinated in order 'Co acid
land use conflicts, duplications and excessive public service
and facility costs.
6. To reculate industrial and commercial developments within to
corununity so that they shall not constitute a "spot gone ",
meaning: a single location completely surrounded by a differ-
ent land use classification.
7. To review and modify regulat=, measures and procedures � }?l
ire- �-erie� ea- aNu- rar.iriec3 in recor,nition of the needs. of con -
temporary situations; the development policy will not be ric,i
and inflexible, but neither shall it be indiscriminately, per-
missive.
8.
To o ncouraco
and extend full cooperation to nea development proposals. Fi :-
ever, the welfare of the general public and intent of the Cc:--
prehensive Plan and the re<ulations of the city will be eY t:-`
primary guide in reVli .JlniT de,,- elo:.- , -,ent p ro2osals.
r
9. Speeial -at tentien- W4:11 -be -gyuAn To prey }elin° provide the citi-
zens of the community with comprehensive and timely information
on all aspects of the Comprehensive Guide Plan, new development
proposals, zoning and other regulatory measures adopted by the
City Council.
10. To provide and maintain a complete set of po14C,
staterimcnts, phys_cal plans, and development p.ogra -q strategies
to serve as a relevant and purposeful reference to cuide private
and public development within the community.
T.and T1aP
The policies of the city are as follows:
- -- 1. -To rec_tuire all--public improvement programs or private applica-
tions for rezonings, special use permits, variances, or land
subdivisions, s°a2-2- be approved only if shown to be in accord-
ance with the reeAmndaL }An4 -e of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. To encourace all private developers sha==- be- eneeu.°wQed to use
air space over existing public right -of -way to expand existing
land uses or in the creation of new uses having a positive bene-
fit in expanding the tax base of the community.
Population
The policies of the city are as follows:
1. To provide new land use opportunities skull- be- puAU_dau only to
the extent that trey do not increase the population_ of the c t�
to a size in excess of 55,000 people in 1990.
2. To evaluate all new land use proposals be- evaluated in terms of
the relative impact it will have on the policy of controlling
population to not exceedin5 a size of 55,000 people in 1990.
Housing
The policies of the city are as follo,, s :
1. To require hich standards of residential development ,a }1} -be
required. a �� '- p�°em.Qted- tkrengk- tke- �drprc �e psi ve_Pl�,u_and_t e
2. To To seek i* -t c- in °e�°est- d- r'.creldL
supply with a balance between high
seu,nt with reservation that lower
become so extensive as to place an
the local tax base.
ing a diversified housing
and low value ho.os ill -tie
value housincq shall not
undue financial burden on
3 --- a�CC'vi.r+ri—�J.`.7.._._�.. — Fa«—`' C: j�'. a; �a2—;'. Cj:: � }i2C�—CC'`:','.."•'•N�.°._..�— tines— _...,H.��ui..a1
en LJi. H.. t�! `U— y- y- .--- U.-- C.t�eVU�.�•..V�
i -
47 --e4: t4:2en2 - shal I -be - mPe e _- t d- ^e- mC }- LNthe }ao -HaMGO -ice 1_T19f3G�. -Limp
minlx�r�Pt- sta:�daY°s- set -by- the - city -CAti eil-- and - AtAeK -ep
reg>�latery- aee:°eies-
3. To develop neighborhood conservation :programs and ho usina rehas-
ilitation programs which will encouraae residen -s to maintain
their property and to provide a systematic housing code en =orce-
ment program which will require residents to maintain their or^-
perty at minimum level.
574.To permit all types of housing i -_1- per°'itteF, provided each
is properly located in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan,
and the site plans and structural quality are in accord wit-
the health and built - <ncr standards
as well as urban design standards.
6--- r�ppreprlste- rehabi?ltatlep- :,teQs ores- t�lll- be- stadlee�-- a._d -i=
yi FS— A ndsL }yp�_ -5 tt .�Aiai A— rays Gi an.,: Q — at
ip,- suNpl� ln- g.,ed -ee._ � ��e_ u_ � �, s:. d _ � _
and - yard- »alnte�:a:°ee- will- be_ua�e =Ay ea- gnu- en�=areeu-
-75.To the -eity -snail require the removal of vacant or abandoned
structures which are deemed a hazard to citizen health or sage
at cost to the owner of record, if such structures cannot be
brought up to acceptable standards within a reasonable period
of time.
876.To maintain programs desigr:eu -te which will sustain the existinc;
housing supply in a safe, sound condition and shall be develo --`d
and administered in a manner consistent with the housing goals
of the community. J J
TrarisDortation
The policies of the city are as follo::s :
1. To maintain a local transportation systems r;ht!st which will be
consistent with the overall needs of the metropolitan: area, and
will contribute what it can o` its resources and planning acti-
vity towards the resolution of area-,ido transportation probler :s.
2. To encourage non -local automoloito traffic gill- be- e�eNN�a red t^
utilize arterial and collector streets a- re?atiwei- s�yy }- Wb�
e£- thara>�rnfar°es rather than allo,. ed to use minor streets throuc i
residential areas, which are designed primarily to serve adjacont
residential property.
3. To classif,, and maintain eaey streets
developed according to its principal function as assir,ned in
the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
4• to restrictt. to t -turn 1::ovo.,:onts and
restricted access to adjacent- properties on maJor st> o is in
order to reduce accident potential and avoid conc-estioa caused
by s10, traffic and turning ::oveI`.'onts. IIo%• :Cvor, access and
turning movements of emergency vehicles shall not be restricted.
-4-
5. To apply special treatment to primary road entrances to the
community, and to the extent feasible to all major roads,
will -be- given- speei °l- tYAQt°° °r:t so provide identity and pro -
duce'a good visual impression to residents and visitors.
6. Public- streets- e�°e -_ °'-N °ae�- te- se�°ve- t'�e - =e� e-iep_e� —uap uixs cr
i_4 _xa :>: .sia�x— xau p� 4 —_paces ia_�acu7iuiuu ...
ing- su €fie4:- -nt fey- _i =s -�oed4
To reauire each individual future land use to provide off -
street parking sufficient for its needs. Public streets are
intended to serve t o function of moving traf_ic.and.not as
parking space.
7. To developed and maintained between the city
and other governmental units, such as State and County High-
way Departments, the Metropolitan Council, and other trans-
portation planning agencies.
_L w pis — uN —i�ra v B�9p98u�_.a. 'a_ .qG —die
9-
��elel- tra�:spe)rtsc�e�_s��
y � -- a _w e -A �- toe- uauezAemen�
ei -an- appropriate- �:uss- tru:.sy�- system - far- t�:e-- e- repel��an -a�ea-
To facilitate and encourage efforts to develop an appropriate
mass transit system for the Metropolitan area due to its
importance in the Richfield transportation svSte-m,
end- seepe- e}- �° pid-= �° s: �s_°- seYviee- te- t�:e- �esie:N- :_s_e -`ye
:c079.To maintain 66th and 76th Streets as s e -t oreu�h�'°es
arterials for movement of traffic within the City of Richfield.
11 710.To improve the design of" 66th and 76th Streets to that these
tna�er- ti�areag?�f�res arterial streets can handle traffic most
effectively in the future by:
a) more effectively controlling congestion through design
features which assist in improving turning movements
onto and off of minor streets.
b) supplement the traffic carrying capabilities of these
two arterial streets by experimenting with
mass and rapid transit systems design to alleviate the
problems of congestion, glare, pollution and accidents
on these thorouc hfares..
c) developing those amenities which will help control noise
on these two arterial streets as well as
beautify their appearance.
11. The effect o.f proposed co:n_:ercial developments on the existing
and proposed traffic cir-Cul. Lion patterns of tie city will be
considered. Proposed commercial developments will not be
acceptable, which in the opinion of the city staff and Planning
Commission will have an ad,:erne effect upon the s-:stem.
Commercial
The policies of the cit,., are as follows:
1. To define commercial area 'c,.ndaries
as to _-:ent intrusion into adjacent lan
uses; and to require the -�o-:ner t:.e -o ne ws- to- provide
proper screening to preserve the existing aesthetic values of
adjacent properties.
2. Wh3 _-le- the- Eitr- reee °nti —t— __ba_neA a -�oa. �C_QLvaw _aASwmaaeP � µj
�CiQe_ iiqq pAy yp.D V_... t' —:1 a t __ a — Q —tt1:1 fft I_ .ty� = - -+..
JJ —n G PLa Q?a afw —uaa >ri,.d -4�ae ti t1 —a 1�`tZ —y!ftt a �gIfe-
part- thret�gt�- ea.�es -e__- _.� �_ .-__ ru�__.. _ . ��� -- --
menu; -lt- believes- ty > =_eu�___Uevetsp.mout- meet- °._.- p�ALery:�
G— pia�A� Crl -4'yL .aG _iYlss Glao_A 7- -�. rl r7 —� ClLlaa.a-
�eCjt2x�teG.-tB- xr`i °�;`:_
To insure that commercial de-:elocment conforms with the intent
of the Comprehensive Guic.e ?lap �rrrile recocnizinc that a strona_
commercial base is i o_ o=_= to maintain cit,:, economic well-
being.
3. To base future comr.erci al de-: elop ment Q a }- wa -uaQed upon the
concept of an integrated bus -ness center, developed accordin,
to a specific- site plan, and Justified by an economic analysis
of the area to be served.
4. To deny rezonincrs of
areas to commercial use, unless the proposed site location has
been justified by an adequate feasibility stud%•, which includes
those factors which a:~ainst a location one of the
presently zoned corn ^ercial a_eas, any: is in co::`orn; :,ce %•'ith
the intent of the Con re::ens i e Guide Plan ado,.-tcd b %- the cit,,-.
5. To regulate commercial estl..;li sly ents so as to
achieve a high standard of - alntcnanco and repair. Vio quallt`.-
of a building and lanascare desic;n, the proper storarr` of tras ,
and the maintenance of t "c yard., the control Of ;104 S ll ;alt,
and odors, and many other _`actors will be considered important
to the acceptance of prer.osed commercial developments.
-
CtjnC�C. C�° E_'C�.--- �i'�.�d....`..r;_r.�.«
eeeeptab }c'-- �ani-Ch -�H- _�C- --- �- N: -: -r_ t- t:;�.-C _ ^N_�ta• .� _- •�N�.- ?l.�N..._...,
e rHi" ti!S 4:t5n 4- 4:1- nt-3 tt._C'"t'-^ n- _
a.
Industrial
The policies of the city are as follows:
1. To consider excellence of site and building design
faeteY in judging Industrial development proposals. -
2. To utilize performance standards to judge all
industrial proposals, and no industrial develcoment proosal
will be accepted which would result in air or water pollution,
excessive noise, odors, or in any wav ad,.-erseiv affect the
local environment.
3. To give special emphasis aril? -be -give to developing research -
oriented facilities within the community, which are designed
___and function td provide services, products, or technology aired
at providing answers to special social and environmental problems.
4. To develop a staff position, a citizen's
advisory committee, or both, to initiate, promote, and assist
industrial development within the co=unit -y.
Community Facilities
The policies of the city are as follows:
1. To locate all public based
on the Comprehensive Plan or amendments thereto.
2. To base the quality of services and facilities �i?1 -ee- based
upon the needs of the areas served, the size and type of popu-
lation serviced, and ri =_ -be scaled within the City's capacity
to pay fo:: the facilities .
3. The- E}ty- w ill -- take -4rr4 t sments To utilize structures and faci-
lities already provided in the City by the School District,
churches, and so forth to inclement their recreation and com-
munity facilities plans.
� - -- °'ire -Eitj -;; �i- �'- CCC •�u.�y4:..,- °��- .,1aI.,C�r.C_C � ° °_ is -.. it::- �-:ese -e
the -Se Nee?- fist -, let -i-; an_ez- ;txt_td_aeNy �" a—�`�;1—G' aa.a`af a+_yaN
- �._.u- C'Ce:?@ wince .�- ,`•i_�:...�_Lav•,:a�WC'?°s-
. J:'— �ii—tne- �e:l',��:3�t}- C�ii-�ri G7— ,...`F.u�_ .., ..�..t-8'_"-CL- ..—a.- aaAL.— .......—r.`..�.., •�:2tiN.a .ate
�t.ten -ttC . tCe 7
c�nee-€ re: �- et:: NY— �AUe?.. �,- a. �H- a .._�Ne;.e�.- e�- ge�.._.....e.;�. � _seyh_as_tNe
Eeu �t�
1 1ryMa e ?d }�t�'3-ENN.Ni_ -_�
674.To provide public facilities and services such as police and
fire`, protection, parks, pla'.- grounds, and the like �-
biee�' -bl whore there is an actu al need for such ser-
vices, in accordance wit''n ti-lo uniform, set of standards, and
tempered by the soul:d jUUI M•olnt of tine govorning bcd.. -
t''eI°:- di_iae�l�i.
priNate- e�°- se: w}- p•- i.. stN_}.. to _,.e�a�— ��= �.— ii ~_..aF.pi�.rG.-
-7-
q- 4.rill- publ4:e- 1ae11ity es-t,1.11 -tie To d eve 1oUtd all ruby is fac1 li t' es
according to accepted standard resulti
s nu fro.-~i thorouTh stud-;
by qualified professionals. Requests for installation of fac-l-
ities by special interests grcuos :;i11 not be a controlling
factor if such a request is in conflict with the =-_ose and
intent of the Comprehensve Plan. -
To give: oricri- to those facilities in de-u d
by the largest number of peo ^1e -and available
To maintain t e nee nbor ood
t- -ft sc -=1 plavarou:?d or ne _.-
borhood park will as the central focus within the neic:•bor ^.ocd
concept of the residential develo-- nt Cooperat-ien •,ith school
district to develop park sites aajacent to and on school grounds
- - -- -will be of maj_pr priority.
18 7 7.Fae eue °- peselble To regulate uti.lit_ ', lines wi11 so ~ to avc -d
disrupting or infringing upon existing or designated c Den soac�
parks.
eipate- in -t�:e- pier.° }�g% -doe_ won_ = end = �oxMisPKa— v__�_P�IA_au=
epe:�- spaee -sys te:�
12 78.To require scenic land easements along the roadways -
required when rights - of -wav are aceµ -red.
13 79.To implement high quality ar�
for both public improvements ~a..
co ratability with the nat..rai
14 710.To maintain a conservation area
tained for wildlife manacemer_t,
purposes at Wood Lake.
des-'= standard's
development tO insure
surrou ~dings.
ed�..utional and scie:.__fic
��._-- j���uye�A l�. ie�pi- 111�t�t�l._ i] enJ- ti: liw- V-. .N:- �_A= aaU�.QgF }'J��- •�yu� - -w. .�- ._..V.�..•�.�.. �.
tlen- p:°egram
15 711.To encourage public educational institutions and t ?;e City,- ri_=
be- e�eeuragNd to formulate uniform set of dovelopment sta-0ar s
and criteria for the im-Dro%,e::cne o' Ox stint; out'.co - � i crea a1
�
areas which are designed to be `e': Flo.;; ci jointl•: or tJ sere.
joint uses within the community.
��--- ��1�.` j1' �e- i?C .L1e.`'.��Hn�21- ±:t.`�!C�'��.. `d"� -a�•' _- -•.� �«.F..- ;.r+ -1-:-
tCj —ie•a .a c. —L'! -7 0 f'�: C4 tt C: }.v'.a —.a .�.: —..a.a .�.. .: ..., ... :. —.�t!t tr-a.._. >.-a -a
de" t of -t ie- eemrttinit�-
., _...— rv.a....."..—'_'.--
Plan- =eL-tke -E3
s
/1
-19 -12.To locate all existing churches and c: -urc related facilities
siet�le- he- elA °Ylv_s�eL� on the Cc.;,pre ^ensit.,e Guide Plan or con-
tinued in any future land use classific- ion nomenclature.
29 713.To encourace churches to join with the
city in efforts to provide for t'e scc_;�=, e- otional, and human
service needs of the __eS_de^ _S of the co- U-rl4 <,.
exist
ing school property as a resource for jc___- sc ool /co=unity
recreational procra_m,s developed in re_at -gin to the overall
parks and open space needs of the cc- un
iIt��ar�- Reseuree- �e�e1en� °nt
- - lt- shell -ire- the- pe?_eY -ems- the -E - -u-
17 -- The- Elty- 5hal? _es_ahl- sN- e- es- _�a�!Q- ee. -s°
seeiai- apd- e�°e= @�e- _iiGrlclfZ — @_— aG�mia a�_w -4 — if>Auamrlxap__
�r @ej i`P.�P,l3- @—e� =�: e'��`J�e E:::, ------ n ao ',3
CEEN'TRAL BUSINEESS NT C717 n.TCT
Land Use - Co=ercial
The policies of the cit-v are as follo,.•.s:
1. (Reference Coal 42 To ach a bal_=-ed
business a-d Se-=i1ces to sat -' s -F v a 4 n - -
0
needs of re-s-il--ients.
2. ( R e f _e _- e n c e Goa! -_` _2 'T o ."En c o u r a c,, e n. e -..: d e -I- -- I e --- c '0 e G"
ized in a tDianne,d, shc-D:Dinc- envircnre--_.
3. (Reference Goal --,,2i'Lo Facilitat-a the of cc--,=r-
cial uses along Lyndale Avenue throug t o -:rocer location
of new developments. . - - - L_
4 (Reference Goal --."2 )To iIax im i z_ e trad e area C C � � * I
,S
ne-d dev-eic=.e'� wit'- -_.-ooer arte-r-L-n-1 St_ cC
orientation.
5. (Reference Goal 7,'2')ToCrea-t-e a n:-n-.•, h=1e ana ;7-mr-
7! C e _v nda e/
den sucoiv ce"-er as a major attr_�c
Hub/'Nicollet area.
6. (Reference Coal 7-"2)To in-crease the inten-sity c-f use �.,rithin
the Lvndale/-Hu'--/7-,,-4collet area.
7. (Reference Go-=.7 -73'To P_rovile CG;. 'e: ^._`._4
e s t r i a n a v s .-:7 r : mar ing lots t o t ^= ?-e
8. (Reference -Coal T-ncouraae tie C 4 :- 47 -
- - - :- - ac i �7
lities as o-,cosed to the "Go It Alcne,,
9. (Reference Goal =."3)TO Create "one sto-p" along
reducing the stri" and compacting t'no rez_-�_Jl .7z
-rea.
10. (Reference Goal 4_,'3)ToEncouraqe ,,h=a an,-:, assist,
Where possible, a coordinatcd buiLlciinq, _on
- both interior and exterior, front and
11. (Reference Goal -:13)Topol,1to Ile%.;
I k-. -G t'-. -, -, N i
strong Co: lmercial area in such a %,,av
flow from the new to the existing rotail 10
the maxi.-nu :l e,:tent.
",)Topj:olli�,j" a-.,, 0` �ho
12. (Referenc-2 Go�ll -
dale Av%nuo, and ','_icollet i'\%*OIlUO
strip s .
13. (Reference Goal -_4')-ior.ovelop safo to
interf ace aroas.
(Peferenc,,2 Gc:il =41i'oL)ro,.-L'o f- o r 12 C
loca t _4 0- S .
_107
Land Use - Residential
The policies of the city are as follo%, :s:
(} 1. ( Reference Coal 2 )To Create a var i _- of hc; sin -'.,:Des by
n�Ql economic ranges t':at ;gill at lea_ = :- -µ'e c _ Y `�.ni �y
h pir , °_S
for all inccr.:e range_. as .:ell aS`sre^ =a_ize,+, , --es SL'
\" housing for the elderly arc house -- for m_c'4le ar u� ^eras
middle income __r i li __ and i nc_ : i dam__ s . a
2. (Reference Gca1 re.-- �..,____al devel^ in
the area to amenit4es such as T%-cod Iake and: R c old Lake.
=+ 1
3. 1 (Reference Goal - 2)TODevelcp and en -force strong design
standards at, the boundary bet�reen residential and non -resi-
- - - - - -.-- - - - -- dential land-use.
4. {Reference Gcal2 }ToLccate ne.. , _al develc':�ment sue
that the enviro=ent ov _s =S-_nc _es= e-t_4 a1 uses is
improved.
5. (Reference Goal =3 Toy pr -e erc; �l ro> -
ties that negatively impact resie�tial areas.
6. (Reference Goal 7-"3)To_• :aintain a housing maintenance progra=m.
7. (Reference Goal -3) ToC_leate a strcn_ ^aru .ion of resident-
ial and co =erci .al uses t1--at c_��_ - irc_C= _es bou r es
nc _
of residential neighborhocd�s.
8. (Reverence Goal -3) T o s t r t t _ : traf -f�c in r`si dent___
areas.
". (Reference Gca1 =3) To :ainta_n a str..n resident.:). tree cover
through a tree tir, pr rim n ad-.,_
pla_ C _ ...r -- nCe Of t;;: �lnt? Coo a � e
tree disease increase.
10. (Reference Goal =3�o L!ini ;ize =roac :.:font of fut..re co=,er-
cial develop::ent into presently resi. :enZial Zoc,ed areas.
Environmental
The policies of the cit-., are as follo• ::s:
1 . ( Reference Goal Dovele_a a dos-L7:, ra ,e. or'. for bu i ldillo
renovation so that a unified ima-e to er.,er':e.
2. (Peference Coal 7' 2}ro I o•.•o t':o uas .;n, rem .t1' oc,sa at tt
boundary of c=ercia.l and rosi -4oit_ al
3. (Reference Goal - 3)To ?nt.c.r_te a strict sir. it 1_.;hting
furniture, and flan _. pr -a.., to ..: 1a.._ e thear,0a.
4. (Reference Goal =3)To ::or., t . :arcs t ^o e__.:<i.:atien o:. roof -to:,
signs and overhead utilities.
5. (Reference Coal -:13)yro '2rans.,;To--m solect-21-4
places and provide for pedestrian access
6. (Reference Coal 13)ro T-,rrc%,e the maintena-c--,
areas - side• -alms, al_ eys, �,_nr�:Jng iot�-3,
7. (Reference Goal !)To cr-2-:nte climatical -1-1,
- --- - - - -_-
pi n exz-erie-ces w'nerever 'ccsS 4 -1 O 1 e
n -
8. (Reference Goal -,,4Y-Po Uni-��v the "01,21' a-
t 41 on v 4th a c-=on pnie-t ` - ter' 7:1 s, or e -
W e o -I ma
9. ( Reference Goal -77' 6 ')T o -E, - c o r 7z g e e nv 4. r' o ^e e C
estrian ways.
Transportation /Parking
The policies of the city are as follows:
1. (Reference Goal -"2)TO E 1 M 4 -ate on-street
ble.
2. (Reference Goal --','2)"I'o !::prove intersect-ic- c_a-4-
3. (Reference Gcal 112)To Reduce the nua-er o-- -.-:--=_e
r-oss-ible.
4. (Reference Goal 3 0 E-7.x amt i e the f e 3 s _412
p a I-.% n the conso_'4_1
uses.
5. (Reference Goal --','3)TO 17,,,orove access
appropriate.
6. (Reference Goal --"')TO T ocate bus shelters at
locations.
7. Pe-ference Goal )To Create bus turnouts
to facilitate bus movements.
8. (Reference Goal -744)ToConnoct bus sl,loltcrs :C
uses witli ap!3ropriato pedestrian ways.
9. (Reference Coal -,.5)ToTE'_,tabI_isII a s%'StOm OLf
oriented arteries to t"'O co:rumercial areas.
-12-
PROPOSED ADDITIOyS
POLICY: To require extensive omen space, eart -::or_ or �ancs�a ^-
ing areas between co.;,.:.ercial and residential de:relc_ lent.
To require cOmmercial develop-7.ent to rcvide aue^ua _e
parking and on -site aesthetic improve -eats.
To require commercial structures to be designed in a
` wav that includes trash areas, utility pole n-'er-
grounded overhead wires a::d uses face
the entire building.
POLICY: To reduce Curb cuts, construct turning lanes, and create
one-way traffic streets ;•;here appropriate to reduca
circulation conflicts.
POLICY: To permit a maximum of one sauna ;.ithin a t. -:o -Mil` = -adius.
To require a special use permit fcr saunas ti:a_ includes
a review of land use intensity and neiuhborhood cc -_:at-
iblity.
POLICY To construct co:= :.;lunity racily es ''-a- ca-
regard-
less
; ce
_ =d of season in an effort to pr ida add_�_chal _`r_
p time youth activities.
POLICY: To allow high density (duplexes and tr- cle:ies) alp_ art-
erial streets.
To decrease the required lot size for Sin _e hcuse_
and side yard setbacks for t1..o- store he es.
POLICY: To provide zoning develo ^rent incentives t--nt ,:ill encoura,e
homeowners and co=ercial developers to re::abi= _t'=ze or
replace aging structures.
To create general develocment "action = la:.s in
neighborhoods.
PO'.IC`_ . To implortient a clan with ? tar ^et .ate of _1117 T-
ally replaces above groun" ut_lizies :_=.i :�: -_ _ -• i
Utilities.
f_1, Ut _.. l be To require all ~._: g
undeizroundod.
0
$!
64TH ST
ADDITION TO NEW FORD TOWN -PARK
j,
65TH ST
fo
Id
cr
j,
65TH ST
Id
cr
j,
65TH ST
cr
CN
,
C -4
NEW �EO R D -TOWN
!-PARK
SITE
1 'AIX
1.
LIP.
Z0,
-.0
00
4w
ev
0
44
TV,
41�i't
41'
COD
00
10
T
4v
ENTERTAN"i'MEN'T DE"VELCPMEAT
G
for the G. Strom property
Date: 4.13-78
7 q
Z.
14.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 17
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENTS TO
THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the pro-
posed amended goals and policies and scheduled a public
hearing to discuss the proposed amended goals and policies,
and
WHEREAS, the Commission transmitted the amendment to
the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the Commission held a public hearing on the
proposed amended goals and policies, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held to arrive at the
recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Com-
mission adopts the amended goals and policies and recommends
them to the City Council for the Council's consideration and
adoption.
Passed by the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, this 9th day of May, 1978.
-,,l � A,_ �,Z�;4A
Joseph Ertman, hairman
Ri46hfield Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Joan Helmberger, Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 18
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENT TO
THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the need
for the property located at 6445 - 21st Avenue South for
park purposes, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hear-
ing to determine if the city's comprehensive plan should be
amended to designate the property for public park use and
open space use, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held to arrive at the
recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Com-
mission adopts an amendment to designate the property located,
at 6445 - 21st Avenue South for public park and open space
use and recommends the amendment to the City Council for the
Council's consideration and adoption.
Passed by the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this 9th day of May, 1978.
os Ertman, Chairman
Ri field Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Q7-"
Joan Helmberger, Sec etary
RESOLUTION NO. 19
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND RECOMMENDING THE AMENDMENT TO
THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the pro-
posed entertainment development guide dated 4/13/78 for the
following described area in the vicinity of 65th Street and
Lyndale Avenue South:
Tracts A, B, C, D of Registered Land Survey No.
1318 and the following described parcel: Commenc-
ing at a point in the South line of Government Lot
1 distant 256.6 feet east from the southwest corner
thereof, then north parallel with the west line
thereof 229.6 feet to the actual point of beginning,
then west at right angles 2.2 feet then deflecting
right 89 degrees 38 minutes a distance of 104.7
feet to the southerly line of Registered Land Survey
No. 1318 then easterly along the southerly line
thereof and its easterly extension to the center
line of Lyndale Avenue South, then southerly along
said centerline 115 feet, then west 306.5 feet to
the point of beginning, except road.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public
hearing to determine if the city's comprehensive plan should
be amended to incorporate the proposed entertainment develop-
ment guide dated 4/13/78, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held to arrive at the
recommendation, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the
proposed entertainment development guide dated 4/13/78
would be in compliance with the goals of the city's adopted
Comprehensive Plan and Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet Redevelopment
Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Com-
mission adopts an amendment to incorporate the proposed
entertainment development guide dated 4/13/78 into the city's
Comprehensive Plan and recommends the amendment to the City
Council for the Council's consideration and adoption.
Passed by the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this 9th day of May, 1978.
ATTE, T:
Joan Helmberger, Secre ary
Jos rtman, Chairman
Ri field Planning Commission
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed
amended goals and policies and scheduled a public hearing
to discuss the proposed amended goals and policies, and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on
the proposed amended goals and policies, and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was used to arrive at
the recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
adopts the amended goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minne-
sota this _ day of , 1978.
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
1
Loren L. Law, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the need for
the property located at 6445 - 21st Avenue South for park
purposes, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing
to determine if the city's comprehensive plan should be
amended to designate the property for public park use and
open space use.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
adopts an amendment to designate the property located at
6445 - 21st Avenue South for public park and open space use.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minne-
sota this day of , 1978.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY'S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed
Entertainment Development Guide dated 4/13/78 for the fol-
lowing described area in the vicinity of 65th Street and
Lyndale Avenue South:
Tracts A, B, C, D of Registered Land Survey No.
1318 and the following described parcel: Com-
mencing at a point in the South line of Govern-
ment Lot 1 distant 256.6 feet east from the
southwest corner thereof, then north parallel
ith the west line thereof 229.6 feet to the actual
point of beginning, then west at right angles 2.2
feet then deflecting right 89 degrees 38 minutes
a distance of 104.7 feet to the southerly line of
Registered Land Survey No. 1318 then easterly along
the southerly line thereof and its easterly exten-
sion to the center line of Lyndale Avenue South,
then southerly along said centerline 115 feet, then
west 306.5 feet to the point of beginning, except
road.
WHEREAS, THE City Council has held a public hearing to
determine if the city's comprehensive plan should be amended
to incorporate the proposed entertainment development guide
dated 4/13/78, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the proposed
Entertainment Development guide dated 4/13/78 would be in
compliance with the goals of the city's adopted Comprehensive
Plan and Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet Redevelopment Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
adopts an amendment to incorporate the proposed entertainment
development guide dated 4/13/78 into the city's Comprehensive
Plan.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this day of , 1978.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST:
omas J. Moran, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 145
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Authorization to Advertise for Bids
The purpose of this council letter is to request city council authori-
zation to advertise for bids for street repairs to 12th Avenue between 66th
Street and 70th Street.
This repair work will consist of crack filling and a slurry coat for
this portion of 12th Avenue. Funds for this repair work are available through
the State Aid Maintenance Fund.
It is recommended that the city council authorize this call for bids.
Respectfully su mitted,
.V V S
Wayne S. Burggraaff wjb
City Manager
WSB /e j a
cc: Finance Director
Public Works Director
r.:
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 144
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Traffic Control Requests
The traffic control committee met on Wednesday, May 3, 1978, to
consider several requests for traffic control devices. These requests were
evaluated based on the criteria previously adopted by the city council, a copy
of which is attached. Minutes of the May 3, 1978 traffic control committee
meeting are also attached.
The committee makes the following recommendations:
70th Street and Sheridan Avenue, 70th Street and Russell Avenue: The
committee recommends installation of a one -way stop sign on Sheridan
Avenue at 70th Street and on Russell Avenue at 70th Street.
6800 Block of West Pleasant Avenue: The committee recommends
changing the on- street parking restrictions from the present "No Parking on
School Days, 8 :00 a.m, to 4:30 p.m." to read "No Parking on School Days
8 :00 a.m, to 10:30 a.m. ".
7400 Block of Pillsbury Avenue: The committee recommends installation
of "No Parking Anytime" restrictions on the west side of this block.
East Pleasant Avenue, 73rd to 76th Street: The committee recommends
changing the present one -way designation of this street to provide for two -
way traffic, with the stipulation that both sides of East Pleasant Avenue be-
tween 73rd and 76th Streets be posted "No Parking Anytime" .
Copies of petitions received by the committee requesting changes in traffic
control are attached. The petitioners have been notified of the committee
recommendations.
Respectfully s mitted,
U��a�. I&
_ Wayne S. Burggra a ff
City Manager
15
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices lists four criteria or
warrants that should be reviewed in considering two -way stop sign install-
ations. These criteria are:
1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where
application of the normal right -of -way is unduly hazardous.
Where total traffic entering an intersection averages 500 cars
for a 24 -hour period the street with the larger volume should be
classified as the main road and stop signs shall be installed
stopping traffic on the minor street.
2. Street entering a through highway or street. It is recommended
that this warrant remain as is. An example of this type of warrant
application would be where residential streets enter into 76th
Street, Nicollet Avenue, Lyndale Avenue, etc.
3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. It is recommended
that this warrant remain as is.
4. Other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted
view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by
the stop sign. High speed shall mean where one street is posted
in excess of 30 miles an hour or where public safety department
radar checks indicate that a substantial number of people driving
are exceeding the 30 mile per hour speed limit. Serious accident
record shall mean three accidents in a twelve month Feriod or
five accidents in a 24 -month period.
Four -way or Multi -way Stop Signs
The Manual on Uniform Control Devices lists three criteria or warrants
that should be reviewed in considering four -way or multi -way stop sign in-
stallations. These criteria or warrants are:
I. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported
accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multi -way
stop installation in a 12 -month period. Such accidents include
right and left turn collisions as well as right angle collisions.
2. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches
must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average
day, and
3. Potential obstructions and /or other street geometric problems that affect
the safety of an intersection.
TRAFFIC CONTROL COMMITTEE MINUTES
May 3, 1978
MEMBERS PRESENT: Carl Marinics, Tom Morgan, Marshall Raaen, Ron Richardson,
and Joyce Wilde.
The Richfield Traffic Control Committee met at 3 :00 p.m. on Wednesday, May
3, 1978 to review pending requests for traffic control changes. The committee
considered the following items:
70th Street and Sheridan Avenue, 70th Street and Russell Avenue:
J. Wilde reported that neighbors of these intersections had submitted a petition
requesting the installation of four -way stop signs at the intersections of Sheridan
and Russell Avenue with 70th Street. The committee noted that both intersections
are "T" intersections and that traffic only enters the intersection from three directions,
so that the most stringent traffic control devices which could be implemented at either
intersection would be three -way stop signs. Committee members also observed that
both intersections are quite open visually as they are approached from any direction.
R. Richardson reported that one accident had occurred in this area in 1977, that
accident occurred in the mid -block on Russell Avenue. C. Marinics reported on
the results of traffic counts taken, which indicate a considerably higher volume
of traffic on 70th Street than on Russell or Sheridan Avenue. J. Wilde commented
that the petitioners concern appeared to be speeding on 70th Street, although T.
Morgan and R. Richardson reported that they had experienced no heavier speeding
problem in this area. Furthermore, C. Marinics observed that the use of stop signs
as a device to slow down traffic had never been successful.
The committee voted to recommend the installation of a one -way stop sign on both
Russell and Sheridan Avenues where they intersect with 70th Street. This
recommendation is based on the warrant which calls for installation of stop signs
stopping the minor street traffic where there is a significant difference in traffic
volume between intersecting streets.
6800 Block of West Pleasant Avenue :
J. Wilde reported that neighbors in thi3 area had requested a change in the present
parking restrictions which read "No Parking School Days, 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 ?.M."
The petitioners had requested either elimination of all parking restrictions or estab-
lishment of restrictions reading "No Parking School Days, 8 :00 A.M. to 10 :30 A.M.
T. Morgan observed that the change in parking regulations to provide for a parking
ban between the hours of 8 :00 and 10 :30 A.M. would be con3istent with the standardized
signs used in several other areas adjacent to the high school. Therefore, the committee
voted to recommend that parking restrictions in the 6800 block of West Pleasant Avenue
be changed to read, "No Parking on School Days, 8:00 A.M. to 10:30 A.M."
May 3, 1978 -2- Traffic Control Minutes
7400 Block of Pillsbury Avenue
C. Marinics observed that the public works department was requesting the
establishment of parking restrictions on the west side of Pillsbury Avenue
to permit easier ingress and egress of large equipment at the central garage.
Parking on the street adjacent to the driveway entering the garage yard creates
difficulty and safety hazards in the movement of large equipment into and out
of the yard.
The committee voted to recommend the installation of "No Parking Anytime"
restrictions on the west side of the 7400 block of Pillsbury Avenue.
East Pleasant Avenue, 73rd to 76th Street: "
J. Wilde reminded the committee that this side of East Pleasant Avenue was
made one way in the fall of 1977, in response to a request by area residents.
After several months of experience, the area residents have now submitted a
petition requesting that this section of roadway be re- established for two -way
traffic.
T. Morgan asked whether any of the original petitioners had signed the petition
requesting re- establishment of two -way traffic. J. Wilde reported that eight of
the original petitioners had signed the second petition. C. Marinics expressed
concern with the establishment of two way traffic on this section of roadway if
on- street parking were continued to exist on the east side.
The committee voted to recommend changing East Pleasant Avenue between 73rd
and 76th Streets to provide for two -way traffic, with the stipulation that both
sides of the street be posted "No Parking Anytime".
J. Wilde reported that Councilman Luettinger had requested the city attorney to
draft an ordinance amendment which would prohibit parking in public alleys.
A copy of the ordinance amendment was provided to committee members. T.
Morgan observed that this prohibition had existed at one time, but inadvertently
omitted from a recodification of city laws several years ago. The committee
voted to recommend to the council that the proposed ordinance amendment prohibiting
parking in public alleys be adopted.
J. Wilde reported that a petition had been received from residents of Washburn
Circle requesting the installation of "Slow Children" signs and posting of a 15
mile per hour speed limit. T. Morgan and M. Raaen observed that the city
does not have authority to establish a speed limit other than that provided for
in state law. The committee voted to convey this information to the residents of
Washburn Circle, and to post a "Slow Children" sign in this area. R. Richardson
indicated that the public safety department would pay particular attention to this
area in coming weeks to insure that there is not an on -going speed limit violation
pattern.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce L. Wilde, Chairman
4
PETITION FOR LOCAL <', i:.'PnU:
T IT31
Y
f _
CI A if- L A,
U�
et-
�-
`
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
f , 3 '9 3
City of Richfield, Minnesota �° °= Ea�'p� "�a
Petition No.
- �� „
APR 11070
Dated Received
City of ca iee'a
-TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota.
We, the undersigned, owners of the real property abutting
hereby petition that such st eet be improved, by �- G
i`
Exami d, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required ntuaber
of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
• per cent
City Clerk
- •
Address
Aff
i
PIP
Exami d, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required ntuaber
of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
• per cent
City Clerk
42/ 7
A/ 4
A,
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
City of R' eld � k) d
f n nesota
Petition No.
Dated Received
-TO: The City Council of the Cit bi Rchfield, Minnesota.
We, the undersigned, owners of the real property abutting
Street '10 69t-*a St2,;3et
hereby petition that such street be improved by
C 0,M njet-l�r or cniige the -'-a to re-d TO oil fro
J:rc to
to con-form to -djpcent str3et-,. T-,.j- i�jocl,- ,L-s f,,-1 nilay Jo -iot. 1irv(� dr—re-
Wr_-, 0 U, I L, Q E, z
If,"ab liv§ i "g nature of
Owner
Address
c-,
2.
V
vJ
8.
LO.
Ll.
L2.
L3.
-4.
.5•
.6.
.7.
10
Examined, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required nixt.ber
of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
- per cent
City Clerk
le
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 143
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Authorization to Advertise for Bids
The purpose of this council letter is to request city council authorization
to advertise for bids to replace the water tower level indicators and controls
in both of the city's water towers. These controls were installed in each
water tower at the time the towers were built and it has become impossible to
acquire replacement components for the controls.
It is recommended that the city council authorize this call for bids.
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
Finance Director
Respectfully submitted,
V�� '1� - w C
Wayne S. Burggraaff '
City Manager
13
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 142
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Selection of Golf Course Site Architect
9
On January 23, 1978, the city council authorized the city manager to interview
golf course architects and to make a recommendation on the selection of a qualified
architect. Since that time the following actions have occurred.
April 10, 1978: A recommendation was submitted by the city manager to
the city council for the selection of Brauer & Associates as golf course
site architect. A copy of council letter number 109 containing that
recommendation is attached hereto. The city council voted to defer a
decision on selection of a site architect to the April 24, 1978 city council
meeting.
April 18, 1978: The city council met in special session to interview three
of the site architectural firms which were considered by the city staff.
April 24, 1978: The city council voted to defer action on the selection of
a golf course site architect to the May 8, 1978 city council meeting. The
city council made additional appointments to the citizen committee and asked
this committee to make a report on the selection of a site architect.
May 1, 1978: The golf course committee held its initial meeting. The
committee agreed to meet again on May 10 and to have its report to the
city council prior to the May 22, 1978 city council meeting. Minutes are
attached.
May 8, 1978: The city council voted to defer action on the selection of a
golf course site architect to the May 22, 1978 city council meeting to be
able to have the benefit of the citizen committee report.
Council Letter No. 142 - 2 - May 22, 1978
May 9, 1978: The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission held its
regular monthly meeting on this date. During the process of considering
an agenda item on the status of the golf course project, several com-
mission members tentatively indicated a desire to endorse the recommen-
dation for the selection of Brauer &_Associates as site architect. However,
the commission agreed to meet again on May 11 to consider this matter
further. This was done to enable the commission liaison to the citizen
committee to meet with the citizen committee on May 10 and report back
to the commission on May 11.
May 10, 1978: The golf course committee met and voted to recommend the
selection of Brauer & Associates as the golf course site architect. Minutes
are attached.
May 11, 1978: The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission met and voted
to recommend the selection of Brauer & Associates as golf course site
architect. Minutes are attached.
May 22, 1978: The city council has scheduled this date for a decision on
a golf course site architect.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff i
City Manager
WSB /jkl
cc: Parks & Recreation Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 109
Agenda April 10, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Proposal for Golf Course Site Architect
On January 23, 1978 the city council authorized the city manager to
interview golf course architects and to make a recommendation on the selection
of a qualified architect. The city manager indicated that such a recommendation
would be made late in March or early in April which would be consistent with
the golf course project schedule.
The firm proposed for golf course site architect is Brauer & Associates.
This firm has been involved in the design of a large number of golf courses
and has the capability of providing a very high level of service to the City of
Richfield. on this project. Brauer & Associates is a multi- disciplinary firm with
previous experience in working for private clients as well as all levels of gov-
ernment. Brauer & Associates has previously worked for the City of Richfield
in providing design and construction management services for the Wood Lake
Nature Center and park projects within the city.
A list of golf courses designed. by Brauer & Associates in recent years is
attached.. The following four projects are the -most recent courses for which
this firm has provided services:
1. Pokegama Golf Course at Grand Rapids, MN. This is an 18 hole
golf course to be opened for the first time in 1978.
2. Brook Time Golf Course in Owatonna, MN. This involves the.
addition of nine new holes to an existing nine hole course. This
project will be open as an 18 hole course for the first time in
1978.
3. A municipal golf course at Moorhead, MN. This is a new nine
hole course currently under construction.
4. Floyd Park Golf Course in Sioux City, Iowa. This project is
currently under construction and involves major renovation and
V
"t Council Letter No. 109 -2- April 10, 1978
rehabiliia tion of an existing 18 hole golf course.
- Staff investigation of previous golf course clients indicates that Brauer
& Associates has enjoyed a good working relationship with these clients; has
provided a high level of design services; is thorough in analysis of unique
design situations and accurate in cost projectic-is.
It is recommended that the city council approve the selection of Brauer
& Associates for golf course site planning services and authorize the city
manager to prepare a complete agreement with Brauer & Associates to cover
such services. The agreement would contain at least two parts with the first
phase covering preliminary design work at an estimated lump sum. cost of
$6,000. The second phase of the agreement would cover subsequent working
design work which would be commenced upon authorization from the city. It
will be necessary to present this agreement for council review, consideration,
and action at the April 24, 1978 city council meeting to enable us to continue
to maintain a schedule which will ultimately provide for use of a new golf course
in 1980.
Respectfully submitted.,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Xorks Director
Park and Recreation Director
Finance Director
City Attorney
BRAUER AND ASSOCIATES
1972
Phalen Park and Golf Course - City of St. Paul, Minnesota
Master Plan
Como Park and Golf Course - City of St. Paul, Minnesota
Master Plan
Golf Course Feasibility Study - City of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota
Wayzata Country Club - 18 hole Par 3
General reshaping to tie into Highway 12 reconstruction
LaFayette Club
Rehab design and construction
1973
Front Range Golf Course - City of Denver, Colorado (through Denver branch)
South Suburban Golf Course - City of Denver, Colorado (through Denver branch)
Golf /Ski Feasibility Study - City of LeSeur, Minnesota
Golf /Nature Center Feasibility Study - City of Fridley, Minnesota
Mankato Golf Course - City of Mankato, Minnesota
Construction revisions to exisiting municipal course
Brook Tree Golf Course - Owatonna - Kaplan, Minnesota
Master Plan
Minnehaha Country Club - Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Master Plan to expand existing 9 to 18
Cannon Falls Golf Course - Cannon Falls, Minnesota
Master Plan (Housing program also planned and since implemented)
Floyd Park Golf Course - Sioux City, Iowa
Master Plan
Southview Country Club - South St. Paul, Minnesota
Rehab projects (periodic assignments for tees, greens and irrigation)
1974
Olympic Hills Golf Course - City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Feasibility Study for Purchase (recommended against purchase)
Feasibility Study for Grand Rapids, Minnesota, Golf Course
Brook Tree Golf Course (construction)
Mankato Golf Course (construction)
•R
Brauer and Associates
1974 - continued
Galls Golf Course - City of White Bear Lake
Master Plan
1975
Pokegama Golf Course - Grand Rapids, Minnesota
Master Plan and Construction Documents
Carl Johnson (private developer - housing and golf) - Sioux City, Iowa
Master Plan and Feasibility Study
1976
Brook Tree Golf Course - Grand Opening
Floyd Park Golf Course - Construction Documents
Pokegama Golf Course - Continuing (including bid and construction)
1977
Floyd Park Golf Course - Construction
Moorhead Municipal Golf Course - City of Moorhead, Minnesota
Feasibility Study, Master Plan, Construction Documents, Bid
(Construction in 1978, open in 1979)
Battle Creek Regional Park - Ramsey County, Minnesota
Golf Course /Ski Feasibility Study
Pokeqama Golf Course - Construction (open in 1978)
1
CITY OF RICHFIELD
COMMUNITY GOLF COURSE COMMITTEE
MEETING: May 1, 1978, Conference Room, City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South
MEMBERS PRESENT: All members currently on the roster were present. Mayor Law,
• Councilman Luettinger and Councilman Ludeman were also present.
Don Fondrick and Sandy Rosenow from the city staff were present.
Chairman Lytle called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
Chairman Lytle referenced the resolution for the establishment of this ad hoc
committee and the stated goals of the committee. The specific purpose of this
meeting was to organize and develop plans which would provide a report, at the
request of the city council, on observation of local golf courses and reactions -
to the work by the three golf course architect finalists.
Don Fondrick outlined some historical information regarding the golf course project
to date and pointed out that staff made a recommendation based on three (3) golf
course architects from an original list of twenty -four (24) firms contacted to
submit proposals and fifteen (15) returned proposals. The three (3) finalists
were Brauer and Associates, Don Herfort and Don Rippel.
Chairman Lytle pointed out the advisability of on -site visits to courses designed
by the above architects. To organize and execute this activity, Don Fondrick will
provide a list of areas courses, a brief summary of the architects association
with the courses and a committee suggested set of criteria to be used in visita-
tion. Committee members indicated their visitation preferences.
The time schedule for immediate future action of this committee was set as follows:
May 1, 1978: Organizational Meeting
May 10, 1978: Reporting Meeting (on visitations)
May 16, 1978: Development of Final Report
May 22, 1978: Have report in usable form for council meeting on this date.
There was some general discussion regarding future activities of the committee.
Respectfully Submitted,
HAROLD A RASSMUSSEN, Secretary
r
s
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 141
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Setting Date for Candidates
to File for Office, Second Reading
At the May 8, 1978 city council meeting, the council gave first reading
approval to an ordinance amendment setting the date for candicates to file
for office.
This ordinance amendment was prepared pursuant to a law passed by the
1978 state legislature which requires that municipalities publish a notice
stating the first and last days on which affidavits of candidacy for a muni-
cipal election may be filed. The proposed ordinance amendment stipulates
that a candidate may not file for office before July 1 of each year, but in
accordance with-charter provisions that such filing must be with the city
clerk at least two weeks before the municipal primary election.
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is
recommended that the council give second reading consideration to this
ordinance amendment at the May 22, 1978 city council meeting.
WSB /eja
cc: City Attorney
City Clerk
Respectfully su itted,
Wayne S. Burggraaf
City Manager
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER II, PART V
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD
City of Richfield does ordain:
1 . Chapter II, Part V, of the Ordinance Code of the City
of Richfield relating to municipal elections is
hereby amended by adding after Section 2. 66 thereof
the following new section:
2.67 FILING DATES - NOMINATION PETITIONS
Petitions nominating candidates for elective
office, provided for in the City Charter, may
not be filed before July 1 of the year in which
the election is to be held. Any such nominating
petitions must be filed with the City Clerk at
lease two weeks before the municipal primary
election provided in Section 4.02 of the City
Charter. "
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
22nd day of May, 1978.
Loren L. Law Mayor
Attest:
Thomas Moran City Clerk
)_7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 140
Agenda May 22, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the CLty Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Denial of Application for Arcade License
Mr. William B. White, 8124 Thomas Avenue South, has made application
for an arcade license at 816 West 77 1/2 Street. The application has been ad-
ministratively denied inasmuch as it does not meet all applicable criteria of the
municipal code.
Mr. White has requested the opportunity to appear before the city council
to appeal the staff decision and to discuss possible amendments to the municipal
code which could make his application acceptable at this address.
Attached to this letter are the following items:
1. A copy of the arcade licensing ordinance
2. A map showing the location of 816 77 1/2 Street and surrounding
zoning districts
3. A memorandum from the public safety director discussing the
investigation of this license application.
While the applicant appears to meet the licensure qualifications, there
are two requirements which preclude issuance of the requested license. First,
Richfield city ordinance 5.17 requires that the owner or manager supervising the
licensed activity be a resident of the City of Richfield. The applicant is not a
city resident and has not named a resident manager.
The second problem results from the fact that the building in which the
applicant proposes to operate his business is located directly adjacent to an
area zoned multiple resident. City ordinance prohibits the issuing of an arcade
Council Letter No. 140 -2- May 22, 1978
license under these circumstances. Therefore, it is the recommendation of
the public safety director, in which I concur, that this request for an arcade
license be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WS B/e j a
cc: Public Safety Director
City Attorney
CHAPTER V
PART II.' AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION
5.17 ARCADES
Subdivision 1. Definition. For the purpose of this section the term "arcade"
shall mean any building, structure or tract of land which has as its principal
use or activity the providing of any of the following or any combination of
any of the following amusements:
(1) Billiard, pool, foosball, air hockey or pigeon hole tables
(2) Pinball machines
(3) Shooting gallery machines
(4) Any other mechanical or electrical device which is designed to
be played by a contestant or contestants and upon which the contestants
receive a score or rating based upon their performance.
Subd. 2. License Required. No person shall operate an arcade without first
paying a license fee and obtaining and having a current license as herein
provided. The license required under this section shall be in addition to
any license or licenses required to be obtained for any of the amusements
described in Subdivision 1.
Subd. 3. Application. Any person desiring to operate an arcade or to renew
his license to conduct such activity shall file with the clerk an application
on forms provided by the clerk for that purpose. The application form shall
contain the following, together with any other information which the manager
may require:
(1) Name and address of applicant
(2) Address of the proposed arcade
(3) The name and address of all persons owning or having an interest in
the licensed premises. In the case of a corporation this shall include the
names and addresses of the officers and directors of the corporation and all
shareholders who own alone or in conjunction with their spouse or children
more than 10% of the issued shares of corporate stock.
(4) If the licensed business is owned by a corporation, a copy of the
certificate of incorporation, articles of incorporation and by -laws of the
corporation.
(5) The name and address of the manager or managers who will supervise
the licensed activity.
(6) Whether any of the persons listed in paragraphs (1)1 (3), or (5)
of this subdivision have been engaged in the business of operating an arcade
in the last five years.
(7) Whether any of the persons listed in paragraphs (1), (3), or (5)
of this subdivision have been convicted of a crime or have had an application
for an arcade license denied, revoked or suspended within the last five years.
129 2/9/76
ORDINANCE CODE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOSA
Subd. 4. License Fees and License Period. The license shall be for the
calendar year or remaining portion thereof. The license fee shall be as
provided in Appendix D of this Code. The entire fee shall accompany the
application and such fee shall be refunded only if the application is with-
drawn before council consideration of the application. (Bill 1977 -16) 8/8/77
Subd. 5. Granting of Licenses.
(1) All applications for licenses shall be referred to the public
safety director and to such -other persons on the city staff as the city
manager shall deem necessary for investigation and recommendation. The
persons to whom an application has been referred shall make their report
and recommendations in writing.
(2) Upon receipt of the written reports and recommendations the city
manager shall cause to be published in the official newspaper, at least 10
days in advance, a notice of public hearing to be held by the city council
setting forth the day, time and place when the hearing will be held, the
name of the'applicant and the location where the business is to be conducted.
(3) The application, together with the city manager's recommendation,
shall be submitted to the city council at the hearing. After the hearing
the council may grant or deny the license. In granting the license, the
council may impose special conditions if it deems such conditions to be nec-
essary because of particular circumstances related to the application.
Subd. 6. Ineligibility for License. Existence of any of the following con-
ditions shall render the applicant ineligible for a license.
(1) If the applicant or the manager of the licensed business is:
(a) under 21 years of age
(b) an alien
(c) a foreign corporation
(2) If the applicant, manager, or persons owning the licensed activity:
(a) is not a person of good moral character and repute
(b) has been convicted of an offense which relates to the conduct
of the licensed business
(c) has operated a similar business elsewhere which operation did
not substantially comply with the provisions of this section relating to the
manner in which the business is conducted,
(d) has been denied a license to conduct a like or similar activity
or has had such license suspended, revoked or canceled.
(3) If the manager supervising the licensed activity is not a resident
of the city of Richfield.
Subd. 7. Conditions of Licensure. The following conditions shall govern
the issuance and holding of all licenses granted pursuant to this section:
(1) Only premises which are within the general commercial districts of
the city may be licensed.
(2) No arcace established after November 1, 1975 may be located on land
which is adjacent to residential or multiple residence districts within the
city.
(3) Arcades shall be closed at 10 :00 p.m. each day and shall not open
until 9 :00 o'clock a.m. on weekdays or until 12 :00 noon on Sundays.
(4) The consumption of alcoholic beverages, whether classified as in-
toxicating or non - intoxicating, or the use of any controlled substance
shall not be permitted on any part of the licensed premises.
8/8/77
ORDINANCE CODE 129.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO (A
(5) No person under the age of 17 years shall be permitted to remain
on any part of the licensed premises after 10 :00 o'clock p.m. unless
accompanied by his parent.or legal guardian.
(6) No person under the age of 14 years shall be permitted to enter or
remain upon any part of the licensed premises unless accompanied by his
parent or.legal guardian.
(7) Adequate off- street parking shall be provided for patrons of the
premises in compliance with the provisions of Richfield Ordinance Code
Section 4.05.
'(8) The licensed premises shall fully comply with all applicable state
and local regulations dealing with health, zoning and building requirements.
(9) The licensee shall be responsible for maintaining order on all
parts of the licensed premises.
(10) Only amusements with a current valid Richfield license sticker at-
tached may be offered for use or kept on the licensed premises.
(11) No wagering or betting for a consideration or any other gambling
shall be permitted on the licensed premises.
(12) The licensed activity shall be conducted in such a manner and located
in such a place so as not to be likely to result in injury or damage to
persons or property in the neighborhood or injurious, annoying or disruptive
to patrons of other businesses located in the area.
(13) The applicant or manager designated in the license application shall
be present on the premises during all times the premises are open. No new
manager may be placed in supervision of the premises until he has been
approved by the city council.
Subd. 8. Bond.
(1) At the time of filing an application for license under this section,
the applicant shall file a bond with corporate surety with the City Clerk.
Such bond shall be in the amount of $1,000.00.
(2) The surety on the bond shall be a surety company duly licensed to
do business in the State of Minnesota. All surety bonds shall be approved
by the City Attorney as to form and execution and deposited with the City
Clerk.
(3) All such bonds shall be conditioned as follows:
(a) The licensee shall obey the laws relating to the licensed
business.
(b) The licensee shall pay to the city when due all taxes, license
fees, penalties and other charges provided by law.
(c) In the event of violation of any law relating to the business
for which the license has been granted, the bond shall be forfeited to the
city.
(4) All such bonds shall be kept in full force and effect throughout the
license period.
Subd. 9. Revocation or Suspension of License. The license may be revoked or
suspended by the city manager whenever the licensee, its owner, manager, or
employees or agents of the licensee have engaged in any of the following
conduct:
ORDINANCE CODE
129.2 2/9/76
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO fA
(1) Fraud, deception or misrepresentation in connection with the securing
of a license.
(2) Conduct inimical to the interests of public health, safety, welfare
or morals.
(3) Conduct involving moral turpitude.
(4) Conviction of an offense involving moral turpitude by any court of
competent jurisdiction.
(5) Failure to comply with.any of the provisions of this section or en-
gaging in conduct which would be grounds for denial of an initial application
for licensure.
The matter shall then proceed as provided in Richfield Ordinance Code
§5.14 Subd. 4.
Subd. 10. Existing Arcades. The operator of any arcade which is in operation
on or before the effective date of this section shall make application for a
license to continue the operation of such arcade. Said application shall be
made not later than 60 days following the effective date of this section. If
the application for license is made within that period, the activity may
continue until the council shall have acted upon the application.
Subd. 11. It is unlawful to falsify an application for an arcade license,
to operate an arcade while the licensee is ineligible for a license, or
operate an arcade in violation of any of the conditions of licensure.
(Bill 1976 -3) 2/9/76
i
5.18. AMUSEMENT DEVICES
Subdivision 1. Definitions. The following terms have the meanings ascribed
to them in this section:
(1) "Mechanical-amusement device" means any machine which, upon the in-
sertion of a coin, or slug, operates or may be used for a game, contest, or
amusement of any description.
(2) "Mechanical music box" means any machine which plays music upon the
insertion of a coin or slug.
Subd. 2. Scope of This Section. This section does not apply to mechanical
amusement devices or mechanical music boxes which are held or kept in storage
or for sale, and which are not actually in use or displayed for use in the
city.
CROSS- REFERENCE: See Sec. 5.22 of this Part for regulations
pertaining to general amusements.
Subd. 3. License Required. No person shall maintain, keep, or sell a
mechanical amusement device or mechanical music box within the city without
first obtaining a license from the council.
Subd. 4. Application. Each person desiring a license shall make written
application and furnish such information as is required by the clerk.
129.3 2/9/76
ORDINANCE CODE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO (A
Subd. 5. Lice
is as provided
cal music box
8/8/77
nse Fees. The license fee for each mechanical amusement device
in Appendix D of this Code. The license fee for each mechani-
is as provided in Appendix D of this Code. (Bill 1977 -16)
Subd. 6. Prohibition of Gambling or Gaming. The licensing of any mechanical
amusement device under this section does not in any way authorize the use of
said device for the purpose of gaming or gambling in violation of the laws of
Minnesota or any other provision of this code. Should any gambling device be
used in violation of Minnesota law the city may proceed in accordance with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 325.53 to 325.56 in addition to the im-
position of any other penalty.
Subd. 7. Location of Device Specified. Each license issued shall specify
the location where the mechanical amusement device may be operated, and such
license shall not be removed to any other location than that specified with-
out permission of the clerk or council.
Subd. 8. Penalties - Seizure and Destruction. In addition to the penalties
provided in subdivision 6 or any other provision of this code, any mechanical
amusement device which is used in violation of this section or in violation
of the laws of Minnesota may be seized and destroyed in accordance with the
provisions of the statutes of the state of Minnesota relating to gambling
and gaming devices.
5.19. BINGO
Subdivision 1. Definitions. The following terms shall have the meaning given
to them by Minnesota Statutes, 1976, Section 349.12:
(1) Active member
(2) Bingo
(3) Bingo occasion
(4) Checker
(5) Lawful Purpose
(6) Organization
(7) Profit
(8) Bingo manager
Subd. 2. License Required. Any organization authorized to apply for a bingo
license pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 1976, Chapter 349, shall apply to the
clerk for a license before conducting the game of bingo within the city.
Bingo may not be conducted until the license is issued.
Subd. 3. Application. Application shall be made on forms prepared for that
purpose by the city clerk. Applications shall be verified by a duly ap-
pointed officer of the organization and by the person designated by the
organization as bingo manager. Applications shall state the dates for which
permission to play the game is requested and the place where the games will
be played. The city clerk may require additional information on the appli-
cation for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this section.
(1976 -20) 10/12/76
ORDINANCE CODE
8/8/77
129.4 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO (A
.9
;ICA&
two
@I=
1 40
tt,
I WAN
.�i ..mss.
MARSH'! 7W"='
OR'dam -
11-2
!" � a �
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: May 11, 1978
To: Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
From: Thomas A. Morgan, Jr.
Director of Public Safety
Subject: APPLICATION FOR ARCADE LICENSE
Attached is an application for an arcade license submitted by Mr. William
B. White who resides at 8124 Thomas Avenue South in Bloomington, Minnesota.
Mr. White is proposing to establish a billiard parlor business at 816 West
772 Street. The Public Safety Department has conducted the required back-
ground investigation and finds the applicant to be qualified under the con-
ditions set forth in Richfield City Ordinance Code 5.17.
There are, however, two problems which have arisen during the course of our
background investigation which we feel would preclude the issuance of the
required license. The first of these problems relates to the zoning require-
ment for arcades. Ordinance Code 5.17, subd. 7 (2) prohibits the establish-
ment of such a business adjacent to residential or multiple resident districts
within the city. While the building proposed to be used for this business
purpose is located within the required commercial district, the rear of the
building is directly adjacent to 77th Street on the south side of the street.
The north side of 77th Street in this area is presently zoned for multiple
resident use. It is my opinion, and the opinion of the city attorney, that
this location would be considered "adjacent to a multiple resident district"
and therefore be ineligible for licensure under the terms of the city ordinance.
The second issue which should be considered with regard to this matter is the
fact that Mr..White is planning to run this business with the aid of members
of his immediate family. Our ordinance code 5.17, subd. 6 (3) requires that
the manager supervising the licensed activity be a resident of the City of
Richfield. Mr. White, as the applicant, is not a resident of our city and has
not, as yet, submitted the name of a resident manager.
I have discussed these problems with Mr. White, and I am enclosing a copy of
an April 26th letter I addressed to him regarding the zoning problem. Mr.
White has requested an opportunity to appear before our city council at the
time they consider this license matter to request that the council modify the
terms of our ordinance so that he might qualify. At the present time, it is
my opinion that he does not qualify under the terms currently set forth within
our ordinance code. Therefore, it would appear that we have no alternative
other than to recommend the denial of this license application.
TAM/ go
Enclosures
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 139
Agenda Ma y 2 2, 19 7 8
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen-
Subject: Request for Authorization to Call for Bids
The purpose of this letter is to request city council authorization to
advertise for bids for acquisition of a 27,500 GVW truck.
This truck will replace an existing truck which is 24 years old. This
truck is fully depreciated and is scheduled for replacement this year. The
truck is used in the public works department for a variety of street mainten-
ance functions.
It is recommended that the city council authorize this call for bids.
Respectfully s mitted, 1 41"
�6m, S . t,V
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
1A
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 138
Agenda May 8, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen;
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Parking
in Public Alleys
Several weeks ago, Councilman Luettinger requested that the city
attorney's office prepare an amendment to the city code which would
prohibit parking in public alleys
An ordinance amendment which would prohibit parking in public
alleys, except in locations marked otherwise, is attached. It is
recommended that the council give first reading approval to this ordin-
ance amendment at the May 8, 1978 city council meeting. The traffic
control committee has also reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment,
and recommends council adoption of it.
Respectfully subm' ted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
Public Safety Director
low
i
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER IX,
SECTION 9.03 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter IX, Section 9.03, Subdivision 1 of the Ordinance
Code of the City of Richfield relating to illegal parking
and stopping is hereby amended by adding after paragraph
19 thereof the following new paragraph:
11(20) Upon the improved or traveled portion of any
public alley except at locations where such parking
is permitted by official signs or markings."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, this day of 1978.
ATTEST:
Thomas Moran, City Clerk
Loren L. Law, Mayor