06-12-2018 Complete AgendaS P E C IAL C IT Y C O U N C IL W O R K S E S S IO N
R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C E N TE R, B AR TH O LO ME W R O O M
J U N E 12, 2018
6:00 P M
C all to order
1.S olar projects update
2.Mixed-use development proposal for 101 66th S treet E ast (66th S treet & 1st Avenue)
A djournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at
least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
June 7, 2018
Council Memorandum No. 39
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
Subject: Solar Projects Update - June 12, 2018, City Council Work Session
Council Members:
At the upcoming City Council work session, staff will discuss the following regarding city
solar projects:
Brief process overview
The agreement process
The locations:
o Public Works Building
o Veteran’s Park Pavilion
o Three liquor stores (not Shoppes at Lyndale)
o Fire Station 2
o Ice Arena
o Pool
This work session is an update from the November 14, 2018, work session.
Please contact Kristin Asher, Director of Public Works, at 612-861-9795 with questions.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven L. Devich
City Manager
SLD:tab
Email: Assistant City Manager
Department Directors
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
June 7, 2018
Council Memorandum No. 40
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
Subject: Mixed-use Development Proposal – 101 66th Street E (66th Street & 1st
Avenue)
Council Members:
On June 12, 2018 at 6:20 p.m., Paul Lynch of PLH & Associates will present an update
on the proposal for a mixed-use development at 66th Street and 1st Avenue (former
Southview Baptist property).
The developer shared plans with the surrounding neighborhood at open house
meetings on April 19 and May 14. At its May 22 meeting, the City Council voted to
amend the Comprehensive Plan designation for this site to ‘Mixed Use’. After hearing
public testimony at its meetings on April 22 and May 29, the Planning Commission
voted to recommend approval of rezoning the property and recommended approval of
the proposed development, with additional stipulations related to additional landscaping
and parking lot screening along the south and east edges of the property. The City
Council will consider a first reading of rezoning the property at the June 12 Council
meeting. At the June 26 meeting, the Council will consider a second reading of rezoning
and the final development plans.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven L. Devich
City Manager
SLD:mrb
Attachment
Email: Assistant City Manager
Department Directors
7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Minneapolis, MN 55425
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING
June 6, 2018
Matt Brillhart
Associate Planner
Community Development Department
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
RE: Summary of Resident Comments for Proposed PLH Mixed-Use Development
6605 1st Avenue, Richfield, Minnesota
Matt,
On behalf of PLH & Associates, LLC, we have prepared the following letter to provide a summary of the comments
received from the surrounding property owners/residents to date, along with formal responses to each of these
comments. Note that any repeat comments were only reiterated and responded to once as part of this summary.
Open House (April 19, 2018)
1. The neighborhood would like a smaller development that fits with the residential character of the neighborhood,
such as 2 story townhouses with walk up entries - this would mitigate the negative impacts to the single family
neighborhood of traffic noise and safety issues, parking issues, privacy concerns, general noise, concerns about
mechanicals, etc. More green space and mature trees. A building and parking areas that do not require variances to
the current city zoning code.
Response: The project being proposed is a 3-story mixed-use building with underground parking. This project is
following the guidance of the city’s comprehensive plan as well as historical development patterns along 66th Street.
The small market study has identified that this area is in need of multi-family residential and could support small
scale commercial. Other options for this site have been explored, as requested, but it has been determined that due
to the price of the land and current construction costs that a building of this scale would be needed in order to be
economically feasible.
2. Neighbors would prefer a residential-only option vs mixed-use.
Response: A residential-only option has been explored but it was determined that commercial space would be
needed in order to make this project economically feasible.
3. Special consideration must be given to the needs of neighbors immediately adjacent to the property, in order to
preserve their well-being and the value of their properties.
Response: These special considerations have been recognized and we have made modifications to the site to address
these items. Some of the changes include additional landscaping, adding earth berms, and restricting the access
onto Stevens. Special considerations will continue to be addressed as they are brought to attention in order to
minimize the impact to the neighboring properties.
4. No restaurants or high traffic volume businesses.
Response: The City has put a restriction on the amount of commercial space that can be used for restaurant area.
It is not anticipated that a restaurant style business will become a tenant but if something like a small scale coffee
shop were to become a tenant it could be a benefit to both the neighboring residents and the building residents.
Page 2 of 6
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
5. More mechanical specs available in design specs. First floor mechanical room to ensure enough space for equipment
and get back additional parking spots.
Response: The mechanical areas shown in the current design are a place holder until the actual mechanical system
is designed. The area shown is conservative to ensure adequate space for the mechanical system, but is likely not
all needed. The actual design of the system will not take place until this project is further along in the City’s review
and approvals process as typical with most commercial projects. Any unused mechanical space will be utilized for
additional parking if possible.
6. No protruding balconies – Juliet style balconies.
Response: The apartment units are designed and sized to best attract potential tenants which a Juliet style balcony
would impede upon. A protruding balcony has been identified as a high priority for tenants and therefore it is
important to this project that they remain.
7. Appropriate and appealing barrier to neighborhood.
Response: Many site modifications have been made to provide an appropriate and appealing barrier to the
neighborhood. The combination of the dense landscaping and earth berm in addition to the existing fence and
Arborvitaes should meet and hopefully exceed these expectations.
8. Provisions for snow removal.
Response: The site has been modified to create a space for snow storage within the property. The changes consisted
of removing the above ground basin, adding drive-over curb, modifying landscaping and adding additional storm
sewer infrastructure for drainage.
9. Wrap lower parking lot to exit into parking from underground.
Response: The initial conceptual design of this site had the underground parking connecting into the above ground
lot instead of onto Stevens. Once the survey of the site was completed and the detailed design was underway it was
determined that this connection was not feasible due to the change in elevation. Placing the underground access
into the above ground lot would have also caused the loss of at least two parking stalls which was not desirable.
10. Break away barriers on Stevens exit.
Response: It is more desirable for residents and customers to have a parking lot that provides through access. In
order to attract commercial and residential tenants it has been determined that keeping both access open is of high
importance to this project.
11. Underground parking exit set back from 66th.
Response: The original access location was acceptable by city requirements. In order to lessen this concern the
access was made narrower and was shifted farther back from 66th Street.
12. Revised plans showing items that we have been told are being included but never seen in documentation, including
traffic control signage, “porkchop” cut out, security plans, and tenant guidelines.
Response: The plans showing all current proposed conditions are now included. The traffic control signage has
been added. The Stevens Ave exit has been modified to no longer allow right turn exits. Comments have been
Page 3 of 6
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
received from residents who want this restricted further, and comments have been received from residents who do
not want right turn exits removed from this access. At this point the access is proposed as a right-in, left-in, left-out
access. Further modifying the curb would only remove left-in access which has not been identified as an area of
concern.
Planning Commission (April 23, 2018)
1. Overflow parking in front of their yard.
Response: It is not intended for parking to take place on Stevens Ave. Parked cars can be removed from Stevens
Ave, if that is the direction the City wants to take with residents that do not follow the City’s ordinances as it relates
to this issue.
2. Garbage concerns – trash in neighborhood.
Response: The site will be managed to maintain cleanliness and ensure the site is presentable. Policies will be
enforced on tenants regarding trash and keeping the site presentable. City Code requires trash containers to be
fully enclosed as currently shown with this project.
3. Light into house.
Response: Landscaping and earth berms have been added to prevent this. A site study has been completed as well
for exiting out onto Stevens for residence across the street.
4. Balconies – noise/parties/looking into houses.
Response: There will be policies in place to keep residents from creating disturbances while using their patios.
5. Ice & snow on 66th Street.
Response: The sidewalks on the PLH property will be maintained appropriately. It is in the best interest of the
property owner to do so as to avoid any liability and potential insurance claims. The walks along 66th street will
be maintained by Hennepin County.
6. Concerns with children / renter will not be invested in the neighborhood.
Response: The intent will be for the residents to be respectful of the neighborhood and policies will be in place to
facilitate this.
7. Handicap stalls – only two.
Response: There are three handicap stalls being provided. Two stalls are proposed aboveground and one below
ground. The amount of handicap stalls being provided meets state requirements.
8. Building height/shade one lane of 66th.
Response: The height currently proposed is consistent with other buildings along 66th Street.
9. Sidewalk/building without buffer.
Page 4 of 6
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
Response: The 66th street project is intended to create better pedestrian connectivity. Locating the building close
to 66th street is intended to further the pedestrian connectivity which is the direction that was provided early on by
the city. The zoning for this property requires buildings to be within 15 ft of the property line which the proposed
building is.
10. Stop sign – approach site lines.
Response: The building and site elements do not encroach within the required site triangles. The access to the
underground parking has been shifted farther away from 66th Street to help alleviate this concern.
11. Trash issues with going down in ramp (taking parking stalls).
Response: Different trash options are continuing to be investigated. At this time the trash enclosure is proposed as
shown. If a more appropriate option is determined then the project will be modified as applicable.
12. Drainage off of lot onto City.
Response: A large underground stormwater system is being provided that exceeds city requirements for stormwater
retention and treatment. Additional stormwater infrastructure has been added to capture stormwater prior to it
exiting the property.
13. Bike to work / danger with driveway.
Response: Sidewalk connections have been added to improve pedestrian/biker safety as no sidewalks are currently
in place along Stevens or 1st Ave.
14. Heating/cooling – where does it go?
Response: The apartments will have individual units within each apartment. The commercial space utilities will be
located on the west end of the building within the screened in area.
15. Balcony – BBQ grilles / cigarette smokers.
Response: Policies will be put in place that details what will be allowed on balconies that will also meet city
ordinances.
16. Green space.
Response: The project will consist of 73% impervious area which is somewhat less than a typical multi-use project.
This amount of impervious is allowable per City code. It should be noted that the existing site consists of 0.48 acres
of impervious area, and this project will only add 0.26 acres to that amount. Furthermore, additional landscaping
has been added to help offset the amount of impervious area on site.
Second Open House (May 14, 2018)
1. Downsize building – land cost/construction costs.
Response: Refer to Item 1 response on page 1.
2. Apartment 3rd level.
Page 5 of 6
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
Response: Refer to Item 1 response on page 1.
3. Doors slamming all hours of night.
Response: Policies will be put in place to prevent this.
4. Commercial shops – delivery (service type).
Response: This will have to be worked through as potential users come into the project. Putting blanket restrictions
in place now could negatively impact potential users. Policies will be implemented to limit impact to neighborhood
residents as well as building residents.
5. Remove commercial / can it be all residential?
Response: Refer to Item 1 response on page 1.
6. Cut through from 1st to Stevens.
Response: Cut through from 1st to Stevens would have a negative impact on the residents and commercial customers
as well. If this becomes an issue, measures such as speed bumps can be added to prevent this.
7. Residential “look”.
Response: The building will be constructed of high quality and attractive materials while remaining economically
feasible. Some of the input provided, such as a “New York Brownstone”, would not be economically feasible.
8. Worried about traffic crossing 66th & driving north on Stevens. Worried about traffic crossing 66th & dangerous
intersection on 66th.
Response: This project should not impact the amount of cars crossing 66th and driving on Stevens headed north.
The majority of commuters should be traveling on 66th Street and Nicollet Avenue.
Planning Commission (May 29, 2018)
1. Can Stevens “dead end” between project site and residential neighborhood?
Response: This change would need to be proposed by the residents in cooperation with the city.
2. Headlights into neighbor’s yard across Stevens.
Response: Additional landscaping will be added. Discussions with the property owner’s about planting landscaping
in residents yard will be had.
3. Can a rock gabion wall be installed on south property line?
Response: This option has been investigated. These style of walls would add a significant additional cost and it has
been discussed that not all neighborhood residents prefer this style of screening.
4. Thinks this response letter was not accommodating/snarky.
Page 6 of 6
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
Response: The intent of this memo is to keep track of neighborhood concerns and questions as they are received
and provide a response to each item. It was brought to attention that the residents felt that they were not receiving
any straight answers and that they were not sure what exactly was being proposed. The responses in this memo
were initially written to be direct and remove any uncertainty as to what was being proposed. This was received
poorly and subsequently the responses have been rewritten to provide better explanation as to the reasoning behind
each response.
Feel welcome to contact us at 952.426.0699 with any questions regarding the received comments or the proposed
development.
Sincerely,
Joe Wagner, CDT Ryan Anderson
Project Manager, Construction Administrator Graduate Engineer
R EG U LAR C IT Y C O U N C IL MEET IN G
R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C E N TE R, C O U N C IL C H AMB E R S
J U N E 12, 2018
7:00 P M
IN TR O D U C TO RY P R O C E E D IN G S
C all to order
Open forum (15 minutes maximum)
E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments
are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who wish to address
the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting.
P ledge of A llegiance
A pproval of the minutes of the: (1) S pecial joint C ity C ouncil and HRA work session of May 21, 2018; (2) S pecial C ity
C ouncil work session of May 22, 2018; (3) S pecial C ity C ouncil work session of May 22, 2018; and (4) Regular C ity
C ouncil meeting of May 22, 2018.
P R E S E N TATIO N S
1.Gene & Mary J acobsen C itizen of the Year for 2018 Award
2.Human Rights C ommission 2017 Year in Review
C O U N C IL D ISC U SSIO N
3.Hats Off to Hometown Hits
AG E N D A APPR O VAL
4.A pproval of the A genda
5.Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended
actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any
Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the
regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar are
recommended for approval.
A .C onsideration of the approval of a C ommunity C elebration E vent license (with a request for the fee to be
waived) and a Temporary On-S ale Intoxicating L iquor license from the F ourth of J uly C ommittee for events
scheduled at Veterans Memorial P ark, July 3 - 4, 2018.
S taff Report No. 93
B .C onsideration of the approval of a Temporary On S ale Intoxicating L iquor license for activities scheduled to
take place J uly 4, 2018, for the Minneapolis-Richfield A merican L egion P ost #435, located at 6501
P ortland Avenue S outh.
S taff Report No. 94
C .C onsideration of the approval of a bid tabulation and award of contract to C orrective A sphalt Materials,
L L C for the 2018 Maltene P avement Rejuvenation P roject in the amount $486,200, and authorize the C ity
Manager to approve contract changes under $100,000 without further C ity C ouncil consideration.
S taff Report No. 95
D .C onsideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the 69th S treet West P edestrian Improvements
P roject application submission for F ederal S urface Transportation P rogram (S TP ) funds under the
Metropolitan C ouncil's Regional S olicitation process.
S taff Report No. 96
E .C onsideration of the approval of an A mendment of C ommercial L ease with the Minnesota D epartment of
Transportation and A mendment of L icense A greement with Transmission S hop, Inc. for the parking lot at
C edar Avenue and D iagonal B oulevard and authorize the C ity Manager and Mayor to execute any
renewals of the A mendment of C ommercial L ease and A mendment to L icense A greement after June 30,
2020, without further C ouncil consideration.
S taff Report No. 97
F.C onsideration of the adoption of a resolution supporting a L ivable C ommunities D emonstration A ct grant
application to the Metropolitan C ouncil for the C edar P oint II housing project.
S taff Report No. 98
G.C onsideration of the approval of a first reading of an ordinance rezoning 6328 A ldrich Avenue from S ingle-
family Residential to P lanned Mixed Use, related to a proposal for the former Lyndale Garden C enter
property.
S taff Report No. 99
H.C onsideration of the approval of the lease agreement between the C ity of Richfield and E TS E lite S outh
C entral, L L C for use of the space formerly occupied by Hat Trick Hockey to conduct physical training
programs.
S taff Report No. 100
I.C onsideration of the adoption of a resolution appointing Whitney B ain and K risten L indquist to the B oard of
D irectors of the Richfield Tourism P romotion B oard, Inc.
S taff Report No. 101
6.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar
P U B LIC H E AR IN G S
7.P ublic hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution providing host approval for the issuance of tax-
exempt revenue bonds by the C ity of B ethel for the benefit of P artnership A cademy.
S taff Report No. 102
PR O P O S E D O R D IN AN C E S
8.C onsideration of the first reading of an ordinance rezoning property at 101 66th S treet E ast (66th S treet and 1st
Avenue) from S ingle-family residential to P lanned Mixed Use.
S taff Report No. 103
9.C onsideration of the second reading of an ordinance amending the tobacco ordinance to include increasing the
minimum legal age to purchase tobacco products and tobacco related devices from eighteen (18) to twenty-one
(21) years of age and updating several sections to include new and updated definitions and adopt a resolution for
summary publication of the Ordinance.
S taff Report No. 104
O T H E R B U S IN E S S
10.C onsideration of approval of the preliminary design layout of Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction P lan from 66th
S treet to 76th S treet as recommended by the Transportation C ommission.
S taff Report No. 105
C IT Y MAN AG E R’S R E P O R T
11.C ity Manager's Report
D iscuss cancellation of 2nd C ity C ouncil meeting in A ugust (A ugust 28)
C LAIMS AN D PAYR O L LS
12.C laims and P ayrolls
Open forum (15 minutes maximum)
E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments
are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who wish to address
the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting.
13.A djournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96
hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Special Joint City Council and Housing
and Redevelopment Authority Work
Session
May 21, 2018
CALL TO ORDER
The work session was called to order by Chair Supple at 5:45 p.m. in the Bartholomew Room.
Council Members Michael Howard; Maria Regan Gonzalez;
Present: and Simon Trautmann
Council Members Pat Elliot; Mayor; Edwina Garcia
Absent:
HRA Members Mary Supple, Chair; Michael Howard, Sue
Present: Sandahl.
HRA Members Erin Vrieze Daniels and Pat Elliot.
Absent:
Staff Present: John Stark, Community Development Director; Julie Urban, Housing
Manager; Steve Devich, City Manager
Item #1
NOAH UPDATE
Community Development Director Stark and Housing Manager Urban presented on tools and
strategies for preserving and strengthening the City’s naturally occurring affordable rental housing.
In response to Director Stark’s request that they prioritize the tools and strategies, Council
Member Howard suggested staff work on items that can be moved forward sooner. He recommended
prioritizing the identification of buildings at risk and tenant protection measures, including a 90-day
tenant protection ordinance and an inclusionary housing policy ordinance.
HRA Chair Supple added that we should move on a fair housing ordinance or policy so we
don’t lose out on financial opportunities.
Council Member Trautmann suggested we also study the 4-D tax break and use it as leverage
to improve the quality of our apartments. He also encouraged renters to apply for City Commissions.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez added that we should partner with schools as we work to
identify at-risk buildings and that we should do further study on just cause mass non-renewal.
Chair Supple invited members of the public to speak:
Special joint Council & HRA Work Session Minutes -2- May 21, 2018
Lee, renter, stated that there is a need in the community for accessible units with zero-
threshold showers.
Donna Paulson, Richfield Towers, expressed concern that there have been multiple police
calls to the building and felons living there.
Dave Snyder, 70th and Harriet, encouraged the Council to adopt tools and strategies to
prevent displacement of tenants.
Santos, Season’s Park, stated that he has lived at this complex for many years and that there
have been multiple owners. Aeon now owns it, and he hopes that they will make improvements.
Alan Lundberg, renter, stated that providing 90 days’ notice to vacate is better.
Jay Tindell, Richfield Towers, stated that there are drugs, alcohol, crime and gangs in the
apartment building.
Ben Whalen, renter, expressed support for valuing renters, and he pointed out that
concessions were made to landlords and that tools were taken off the table because of landlords.
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:58 p.m.
Date Approved: June 12, 2018
_____________________________
Pat Elliott
Mayor
_____________________________ ____________________________
Jared Voto Steven L. Devich
Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Special City Council Work Session
May 22, 2018
CALL TO ORDER
The work session was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 6:15 p.m. in the Fred Babcock Room.
Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Michael Howard; Maria Regan Gonzalez;
Present: and Simon Trautmann.
Item #1
DISCUSSION REGARDING APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMISSION
Council Member reviewed the application materials and discussed the applicants to fill the
vacancy on the Community Services Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:27 p.m.
Date Approved: June 12, 2018
_____________________________
Pat Elliott
Mayor
_____________________________ ____________________________
Jared Voto Steven L. Devich
Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Special City Council Work Session
May 22, 2018
CALL TO ORDER
The work session was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 6:30 p.m. in the Bartholomew Room.
Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Michael Howard; Maria Regan Gonzalez;
Present: and Simon Trautmann.
Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Chris Regis, Finance Manager; and Jared
Voto, Executive Aide/Analyst.
Item #1
KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES
Finance Manager Regis gave an overview of the Financial Management Plan and Capital
Financing Plan documents. He went into detail on Local Government Aid (LGA) as it relates to the
operating levy.
City Manager Devich discussed the operating revenues and expenditures and stated the
assumption for 2019 is status quo; not adding any new services. He also discussed the potential
increase in 2019 and 2020 due to increase debt/special levy.
Mayor and Council members asked questions and discussed topics such as the increase in
commercial tax base as projects are completed and the risks of delaying some of the projects being
bonded.
ADJOURNMENT
The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:56 p.m.
Date Approved: June 12, 2018
_____________________________
Pat Elliott
Mayor
_____________________________ ____________________________
Jared Voto Steven L. Devich
Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Michael Howard; Maria Regan Gonzalez;
Present: and Simon Trautmann.
Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; John Stark,
Community Development Director; Jay Henthorne, Chief of Police; Jim
Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director; Chris Regis, Finance Manager;
Melissa Poehlman, Planning & Redevelopment Manager/Assistant Community
Development Director; Jennifer Anderson, Support Services Manager; and
Jared Voto, Executive Aide/Analyst.
OPEN FORUM
None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Elliott led the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/Howard, S/Trautmann to approve the minutes of the Regular City Council meeting of May 8,
2018
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #1
THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT UPDATE BY CHAIR AND DISTRICT 4
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN GUNYOU
John Gunyou, Chair and District 4 Representative of the Three Rivers Park District, presented
about the District’s mission, role in the region, environmental stewardship, highlights of the District,
Mississippi Gateway Regional Park, park partnerships including accessible kayaking and fishing
improvements at Taft Park, Nine Mile Creek Trail, trail partnerships including Nokomis-Minnesota
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Regular Meeting
May 22, 2018
Council Meeting Minutes -2- May 22, 2018
River trail connection along 70th Street, and improvements to community engagement in center cities
like Richfield. John Gibbs, District 5 Representative of the Three Rivers Park District was also in
attendance.
Council Members thanked Chair Gunyou and Representative Gibbs for all the work that Three
Rivers Park District does in the city.
Item #2
PRESENTATION OF 2017 FOOD SAFETY AWARDS
Council Member Regan Gonzalez introduced the Chair and Vice Chair of the Advisory Board
of Health.
Kristine Klos, Chair of the Advisory Board of Health, and Taylor Croissant, Vice Chair,
presented the 2017 Food Safety Award. Cadao Express, 6637 Penn Avenue S, was awarded the
2017 Food Safety Award for full service restaurants and Taco Bell, 7740 2nd Avenue S, was awarded
the 2017 Food Safety Award for fast food/pizza carry out/limited service restaurants.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez thanked the Advisory Board of Health members and
leadership for the work they do in the community.
Item #3
RECEIPT OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2017. (S.R. NO. 84)
Mayor Elliot presented Staff Report No. 84.
Caroline Stutsman, CPA, BerganKDV, presented information on the audit for fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017, and highlights from the Richfield Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR) for the same fiscal year.
Council Members thanked Ms. Stutsman for the presentation and thanked staff for their work
to keep the City in good financial condition.
m/Trautmann, s/Garcia to approve accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the
City for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #4
COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Hats Off to Hometown Hits
Council Member Garcia spoke regarding an event at Assumption Church on Memorial Day
celebrating 75 military veterans in their cemetery; on June 2-16 the Bloomington Police Department
will be holding a book sale (called “Book’em”) with the proceeds funding children’s programs; on
Thursday, June 7 at 7 p.m. in Augsburg Park is the beginning of music in the park, there will also be
yoga in the park from 6 to 6:45 p.m.; on Tuesday, June 12 at noon the Minnesota Zoo Mobile in
Augsburg Park.
Council Meeting Minutes -3- May 22, 2018
Council Member Trautmann spoke regarding the Memorial Day service at Veterans Park on
May 28 at 2 p.m. and invited everyone to attend; also, the Richfield outdoor pool opens June 8 and
passes are available to purchase.
Mayor Elliott spoke regarding the Memorial Day service at Veterans Park and the event
honoring Lt. Charles Turner, a Richfield native and first reported Minnesota casualty in the Gulf War
Operation Desert Storm; also, he attended the grand opening at Village Shores (66th and Lyndale) on
May 21, the developer and owner of the facility put $22 million into the facility.
Council Member Howard spoke regarding the work session held on May 21 regarding the
City’s strategies for naturally-occurring affordable housing in the community.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez spoke regarding the Advisory Board of Health’s meeting on
May 21 had a presentation from Bloomington Public Health on the impact and connection between
health and housing; Unity in the Community on May 24 from 5 to 7:30 p.m. in Veterans Park; the Nine
Mile Creek Regional Trail grand opening on Sunday, June 3 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.; and
entertainment in the park in Augsburg Park on Thursday nights at 7 p.m. and live children’s shows on
Tuesdays at noon.
Item #5
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
M/Elliott, S/Howard to approve the agenda.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #6
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Devich presented the consent calendar.
A. Consideration of the approval of an annual request for a Temporary On Sale Intoxicating
Liquor license for the Academy of Holy Angels, located at 6600 Nicollet Avenue South, for
their Holy Angels Rock the Lawn event taking place Friday, June 22, 2018. (S.R. No. 85)
B. Consideration of the approval of a resolution authorizing the City to affirm the monetary limits
on statutory municipality tort liability. (S.R. No. 86)
RESOLUTION NO. 11501
RESOLUTION AFFIRMING MUNICIPAL TORT LIABILITY LIMITS
ESTABLISHED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES 466.04
This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11501.
C. Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into
agreements related to the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Landscape Partnership
Program (S.R. No. 87)
RESOLUTION NO. 11502
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION AND PRIMARY
CONTACT PERSONS FOR MNDOT LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP
APPLICATION
Council Meeting Minutes -4- May 22, 2018
This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11502.
M/Trautmann, S/Elliott to approve the consent calendar.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #7
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR
None.
Item #8
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION OF A PROPERTY ON 66TH STREET,
BETWEEN 1ST AND STEVENS AVENUES (101 66TH STREET EAST). (S.R. NO.
88)
Mayor Elliott presented Staff Report No. 88.
Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman stated that approval of the
comprehensive plan amendment does not obligate the Council to approve the development proposal
for this area that will likely be considered next month. They are separate actions that need to be
approved in this order.
Mayor Elliott invited a neighborhood spokesperson to address the Council.
Julie Lapensky, address not given, speaking for the neighborhood, spoke regarding the
neighborhood’s position that an amendment to the comprehensive plan to designate this area as
mixed use should be denied and provided the neighborhood’s reasoning for requesting the denial.
Mayor Elliott read the recommended action and historical context from the staff report. He
discussed the work of citizens in updating the comprehensive plan and that the comprehensive plan
amendment does not obligate the City to approve the current development proposal. He also
discussed the work of the comprehensive plan advisory committee in finding this area should be
mixed use and stated he planned to move to approve the comprehensive plan amendment as it
ratified the work of the committee.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez thanked the neighborhood for their comments and agreed
with Mayor Elliott’s comments. She stated she was not in support of the current development
proposal, based on the building scale and fit in the community; however, that is not the issue before
them tonight. She stated she believe the area was included in the small area study.
Assistant Community Development Director Poehlman confirmed the site was included in the
small area plan of the 66th and Nicollet area.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez explained that she believes mixed-use is the best
designation for the area. She also stated the importance of the Council, community, and developer to
work together to make sure the specific proposal is a better fit to the community and residents.
Council Member Garcia stated she watched the Planning Commission, attended the two open
houses, and visited with the neighbors. She stated when she was asked if she wanted to live in the
Council Meeting Minutes -5- May 22, 2018
neighborhood she said “no”. She echoed the statements made by Mayor Elliott and Council Member
Regan Gonzalez. She agreed the neighbors have legitimate concerns and the challenges this
development brings. She discussed the proposed project and was not sure it was the right density
based on the size of the lot and the proposed commercial and residential. She also discussed the
proposal of a restaurant in the commercial space and didn’t believe there was adequate parking. She
mentioned the lack of green space on the project site as well. Lastly, she asked questions of the
developer that needed to be answered related to the proposed development before it comes to the
Council for consideration.
Council Member Howard thanked the neighborhood for their comments and discussed the
item for consideration is amending the comprehensive plan. He discussed that the comprehensive
plan is for the long-term vision and direction of the city and needs to be forward-looking. He stated he
believed this site makes sense for mixed-use, based on the community feedback and reconstruction
of 66th Street and opportunities across the entire corridor to develop. He commented there are very
few areas in the city for opportunities for development and welcome new Richfield residents into the
community. He stated this site as mixed-use is the most realistic and makes the most sense long-term
and forward-looking. He stated the specific development is a separate discussion but thanked the
neighborhood for their comments and believed the developer is sincere in working with the neighbors
to incorporate feedback.
Council Member Trautmann thanked the residents for all their comments. He stated change is
hard, and that he grew up on a street that had a lot of traffic and still had community in their
neighborhood. He stated he agreed that mixed-use was the right use for the site.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez stated that we are a small community and there are limited
areas for redevelopment and areas to expand our tax base. She also outlined changes made by the
Community Development staff to be more proactive in community outreach.
Council Member Trautmann thanked Council Member Regan Gonzalez for mentioning the
changes and commented on the communication efforts.
M/Elliott, S/Howard to approve a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan designation of
101 66th Street East from Quasi-Public and Low Density Residential to Mixed Use.
RESOLUTION NO. 11503
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF 101 66TH STREET EAST TO
“MIXED USE”
Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11503.
Item #9
PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF THE APPROVAL OF NEW ON-
SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR LOS SANCHEZ
TAQUERIA #2, LLC D/B/A LOS SANCHEZ TAQUERIA LOCATED AT 2 WEST
66TH STREET. (S.R. NO. 89)
Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 89 and opened the public hearing.
M/Garcia, S/Elliott to close the public hearing.
Motion carried 5-0.
Council Meeting Minutes -6- May 22, 2018
M/Garcia, S/Elliott to approve the issuance of new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor
license for Los Sanchez Taqueria #2, LLC d/b/a Los Sanchez Taqueria located at 2 West 66th Street.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #10
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPROVAL OF THE FIRST READING OF AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOBACCO ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE
INCREASING THE MINIMUM LEGAL AGE TO PURCHASE TOBACCO
PRODUCTS AND TOBACCO RELATED DEVICES FROM EIGHTEEN (18) TO
TWENTY-ONE (21) YEARS OF AGE AND UPDATING SEVERAL SECTIONS TO
INCLUDE NEW AND UPDATED DEFINITIONS. (S.R. NO. 90)
Council Member Regan Gonzalez presented Staff Report No. 90.
Support Services Manager Anderson provided additional background on the ordinance
amendment.
Council Member Trautmann discussed he would support the Tobacco 21 in general, but would
like to remove the vaping and vaping community from the age limit in the ordinance. He stated he’s
looked at a lot of studies and there is a difference between vaping and smoking. He stated his brother
vapes and quit smoking because of it; the vaping community is a cessationist community. He would
support the ban but asked that vaping be distinguished from cigarettes and other tobacco products.
Mayor Elliott seconded Council Member Trautmann’s amendment and stated he received a lot
of information on vaping, from both sides, but it was mostly anecdotal on the opposition of vaping and
it was medical studies in favor of vaping.
Council Member Howard spoke against the proposed amendment and thought it was
confusing the issue. He stated Tobacco 21 is about access to tobacco products. He stated the studies
show that if people have access to tobacco products very early they are more likely to carry that
addiction forward. He stated studies show that moving the age from 18 to 21 reduce the access for
12, 13, 14 year olds. He stated he thinks vaping should be included.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez spoke against the proposed amendment. She stated it is
about access to nicotine products, which includes vaping products. She stated it is not a discussion
about using vaping as a cessation product or stigmatizing smokers or the vaping community. She
stated this is about access for our youth to nicotine.
M/Trautmann, S/Elliott to amend the proposed ordinance to remove the vaping and vaping
community from the age limit in the ordinance.
Motion denied 2-3 (Council Members Garcia, Howard, and Regan Gonzalez voting against).
Mayor Elliott discussed his concerns for voting for this and putting arbitrary age limits on the
use of legal products. He stated he was going to vote for the ordinance, but does not like the way we
are doing it.
Council Member Garcia discussed the Minnesota legislature failing to pass a bill to not use cell
phones while driving, people wanting gun control legislation, and stated anything that saves lives or
that promotes good health is acceptable.
Council Meeting Minutes -7- May 22, 2018
Council Member Trautmann stated he thinks this measure will bring health and save lives, but
is not persuaded on the vaping component. He will support the ordinance and thanked everyone who
came out.
Council Member Regan Gonzalez stated that tobacco remains to be the number one cause of
preventable death and disease, and in Minnesota the number of 9th and 11th graders using e-
cigarettes and vaping is over twice the rate of regular cigarettes. She stated this is about keeping
nicotine out of the hands of our children. Lastly, she thanked the community members of the audience
here in support of the ordinance amendment.
M/Regan Gonzalez, S/Howard to approve the first reading of an ordinance amending the
tobacco ordinance to include increasing the minimum legal age to purchase tobacco products and
tobacco-related devices from 18 to 21 and schedule the second reading of the ordinance for June 12,
2018.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #11
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SIGN
REGULATIONS AND A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUMMARY
PUBLICATION OF SAID ORDINANCE. (S.R. NO. 91)
Council Member Howard presented Staff Report No. 91.
M/Howard, S/Regan Gonzalez to approve an ordinance amending sign regulations and
approve a resolution authorizing summary publication of said ordinance.
RESOLUTION NO. 11504
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN
ORDINANCE TO UPDATE SIGN REGULATIONS
Motion carried 5-0. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 11504.
Item #12
CONSIDERATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF AN ADULT MEMBER TO THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION WITH A TERM EXPIRING JANUARY
31, 2021. (S.R. NO. 92)
Council Member Garcia presented Staff Report No. 92.
M/Garcia, S/Elliott to appoint Ronald Macklem to the Community Services Commission with a
term expiring January 31, 2021.
Motion carried 5-0.
Item #13
SUMMARY REVIEW OF THE CITY MANAGER'S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION FOR 2017, HELD ON MAY 8, 2018, AS REQUIRED
BY MINN. STATUTES 13D.05 SUBD. 3(A).
Council Meeting Minutes -8- May 22, 2018
Mayor Elliott provided a summary of the City Manager’s annual performance evaluation for
2017.
Item #14
CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Devich thanked the City Council and their support of the City staff. He also
discussed the work of the Three Rivers Park District and their work with the City and the good
relationship they have with staff.
Item #15
CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
M/Garcia, S/Elliott that the following claims and payrolls be approved:
U.S. Bank 05/22/18
A/P Checks: 268017 - 268403 $ 1,358,998.58
Payroll: 136417 - 136728; 42797 654,802.38
TOTAL $ 2,013,800.96
Motion carried 5-0.
OPEN FORUM
None.
Item #16
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:52 p.m.
Date Approved: June 12, 2018
Pat Elliott
Mayor
Jared Voto Steven L. Devich
Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.A.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 93
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jennifer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice
5/30/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/5/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the approval of a Community Celebration Event license (with a request for the fee to
be waived) and a Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license from the Fourth of July Committee for
events scheduled at Veterans Memorial Park, July 3 - 4, 2018.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
On May 23, 2018, the City received applications for a Community Celebration Event license (with a request
for the fee to be waived) and a Temporary On-Sale I ntoxicating Liquor license from the Fourth of J uly
Committee. The events are scheduled to take place at Veterans Memorial Park, J uly 3 - 4, 2018. The fee for
the Temporary On-Sale I ntoxicating Liquor license has been received, along with all required documentation,
including liquor liability insurance.
The Director of Public Safety has reviewed and approved the license application and sees no reason for it to
be denied.
The street dance is held on J uly 3, 2018, from 3:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. Alcohol will be served from 3:00 p.m.
to 11:30 p.m. On J uly 4, 2018, alcohol will be served from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. On both days, alcohol will
be served in an enclosed fenced-in area with monitored entrance points. Only wine and strong beer will be
served. Public Safety police officers have been hired by the Fourth of July Committee to patrol the
area for these events.
Food vendors will be available both days and the appropriate food handling and sanitation procedures will
be followed.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Approve the request for a Community Celebration Event license with fees waived and a
Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the Fourth of July Committee for events scheduled
at Veterans Memorial Park, July 3 - 4, 2018.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Each year the Fourth of J uly Committee applies for a Community Celebration Event license and
requests the licensing fee of $5,000 be waived for the activities taking place throughout the City.
The applicant has satisfied the following requirements for issuance of these licenses:
Applications and required licensing fees for the Temporary On-Sale I ntoxicating Liquor and Multi-
Food Vendor licenses have been received.
Proof of liquor liability insurance has been submitted showing West Bend Mutual I nsurance
Company affording the coverage.
A detailed plan of the days' events is currently on file.
The applicant, as well as each professional concession, has contacted food sanitarians from the
City of Bloomington to ensure proper food handling practices are followed.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Richfield City Code Section 1202.05 requires all applicants to comply with all of the provisions of
this code, as well as the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 340A.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The Temporary On-Sale I ntoxicating Liquor license, allowing for the sale of wine and strong beer
only, is valid for the street dance on J uly 3, 2018, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. and in the beer
garden on J uly 4, 2018, from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The Temporary On-Sale I ntoxicating Liquor and Multi-Food Vendor license fees have been
received.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
There are no legal considerations.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
The Council could deny the Community Celebration Event and Temporary On-Sale I ntoxicating Liquor
licenses. This would result in the applicant not being able to conduct activities, especially those
concerning food preparation and alcohol sales.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Heather Lenke, President of the Fourth of J uly Committee, has been notified of the date for Council
consideration of this request.
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.B.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 94
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jennifer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice
5/30/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/5/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the approval of a Temporary On Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for activities
scheduled to take place July 4, 2018, for the Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post #435, located
at 6501 Portland Avenue South.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
On May 25, 2018, the City received application materials for a Temporary On Sale I ntoxicating Liquor license
for the Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post #435.
This annual request is in conjunction with the Richfield Fourth of J uly Community Celebration. The American
Legion plans to have an open house with a live band in their parking lot, food and refreshments, including
alcohol. This year the American Legion is requesting the license for one day only. Their request is to serve
alcohol from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
The Director of Public Safety has reviewed and approved the license application and sees no reason it
should be denied.
The applicant has agreed to adhere to the traffic and parking conditions set by the Public Safety Department.
A summary explaining the conditions is included with this staff report.
All required information has been provided. All licensing fees have been received.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Approve the issuance of a Temporary On Sale Intoxicating Liquor license for the
Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post #435, located at 6501 Portland Avenue South for the
activities scheduled to take place July 4, 2018.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The applicant has satisfied the following requirements for the issuance of this license:
The required licensing fee has been paid.
Proof of liquor liability insurance has been submitted showing I ntegrity Mutual I nsurance
Company affording coverage.
The applicant has contacted sanitarians from City of Bloomington to ensure proper food handling
practices are followed.
Employees of the Legion will be providing security and will patrol the area for this event.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Richfield City Code Section 1202.05 requires all applicants to comply with all of the provisions of
this code, as well as the provisions of Minnesota Statue Chapter 340A.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The sale of intoxicating liquor in the parking lot must cease no later than 11:00 p.m on J uly 4,
2018.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The required licensing fees have been received.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
There are no legal considerations.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
The Council could deny the requested license, which would mean the applicant would not be able to
serve alcohol outside to the public during the Fourth of J uly activities.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Richard Hervieux- Legion Manager
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
S ummary of traffic/parking conditions B ackup Material
SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONDITIONS FOR
MINNEAPOLIS RICHFIELD AMERICAN LEGION POST 435
4TH OF JULY EVENT
Richfield Public Safety staff has spoken with management from the American Legion to
address some specific Public Safety issues and concerns. As a condition of the
approval of their license it was decided Portland Avenue will be closed from 8:00 p.m. to
12:00 a.m. In addition, 66th Street will also shut down between the hours of 11:00 a.m.
to 11:30 p.m. No through traffic will be allowed on 66th Street and Portland Avenue and
all traffic will be routed away from the event. American Legion patrons will be allowed to
enter the Legion parking lot until approximately 8:00 p.m. when Portland Avenue closes.
Patrons will not be allowed to leave the Legion parking lot after 8:00 p.m. All patrons
parked in the lot at 8:00 p.m. will be required to remain in the lot until 11:15 p.m. when
all pedestrian traffic is clear on Portland Avenue. ONLY cabs and limos that are
contracted with the Legion to provide sober cab services will be allowed to access the
site from Portland Avenue after 8:00 p.m. These vehicles will have placards provided to
them by the American Legion to identify their right to enter. At 11:15 p.m. when patrons
are allowed to exit the American Legion lot, they will be able to go northbound only on
Portland Avenue. Also, vehicles that are parked at the ice arena will be instructed they
need to remain in place until 11:15 p.m. All residents living on 66th Street and Portland
Avenue will be allowed entrance onto these streets.
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.C.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 95
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: L ogan V lasaty, C ivil E ngineer
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
6/4/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/5/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the approval of a bid tabulation and award of contract to Corrective Asphalt
Materials, L LC for the 2018 Maltene Pavement Rejuvenation Project in the amount $486,200, and
authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes under $100,000 without further City Council
consideration.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
As discussed at the February 27, 2018, City Council work session the City will be initiating a thorough street
maintenance program following the residential mill and overlay program to preserve the new road surface and
further extend pavement life. The maintenance program will include:
Maltene Rejuvenation or reclamite application (1-3 years following mill and overlay)
Crack Sealing (1-3 years following)
Sealcoat or other application (7-10 years following)
This year's reclamite application will be performed on the streets that were resurfaced in 2015 & 2016, as well
as a couple parking lots done in recent years. Bids for the project were opened on May 22,
2018. Corrective Asphalt Materials, LL C was the only bidder, with a bid of $486,200.00. T he
engineer's estimate for the project was $503,750.
The Preservation Process
After paving, asphalt settles and dries out causing surface voids to form which allow water into the pavement
and ultimately lead to cracking and other forms of pavement failure. Maltene based pavement
rejuvenation, using the product known as reclamite, soaks into these voids to seal them up. T his
process gives the asphalt more durability and flexibility, and results in longer pavement life.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the bid tabulation and award of contract to Corrective Asphalt Materials, L LC in
the amount of $486,200 for the Maltene Pavement Rejuvenation project, and authorize the City
Manager to approve contract changes under $100,000 without further City Council consideration.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The residential roads were originally constructed between 1972 and 1977. A pavement
management program began in 1980. That policy direction was set to protect the City’s capital
investment and maintain an acceptable roadway system. The City’s ongoing preventive
maintenance program is essential in delaying the costs associated with total reconstruction.
I n September 2014, the Accelerated Mill and Overlay program was approved in the Five-Year
Reconstruction Plan for the purpose of utilizing street reconstruction bonds to finance the work in
place of special assessments. The bonds are paid down by an increase in the electric and gas
franchise fees, effective April 2014.
Approximately 85 miles of roadway will be milled and overlaid as part of the six year program.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City has adopted a pavement management program to maintain the quality of the road and
prolong the life of the capital investment (Comprehensive Plan – Road Pavement Conditions).
I n 2013, the City Council approved an Accelerated Mill and Overlay Program to complete the
remaining 85 miles of roads that have not received any major resurfacing since they were
constructed. This program also includes the repair of storm and sanitary manholes and catch
basins.
An increase in electric and gas franchise fees was approved in 2013, and enacted in
April 2014, to fund the Accelerated Mill and Overlay Program and provide long-term pavement
preservation.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The maltene based pavement rejuvenation must be completed by the fall.
Regular preventive maintenance techniques are effective in delaying costly street reconstruction
projects.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
One (1) bid was received for the 2018 Maltene Pavement Rejuvenation project.
The lowest responsive and responsible bid was $486,200 submitted by Corrective Asphalt
Materials, LLC.
The engineer's estimate for the project was $503,750.
This work is funded by the existing franchise fees.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
W hen the amount of purchase is estimated to exceed $100,000, sealed bids shall be solicited by
public notice in the manner and subject to the law governing contracts or purchases by the City of
Richfield.
The advertisement for bid for the project was published in the Richfield Sun-Current on May 10,
2018, and on the Questcdn.com website on May 10, 2018.
Bid opening was held on May 22, 2018. A copy of the bid tabulation is attached.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
None
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
B id Tabulation B ackup Material
E ngineer's E stimate B ackup Material
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Bid Opening
May 22, 2018
9:00 a.m.
2018 Maltene Pavement Rejuvenation Project
Bid No. 18-05
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff
was called by Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the
meeting was to receive; open and read aloud bids for the 2018 Maltene Pavement
Rejuvenation Project, as advertised in the official newspaper on May 10, 2018.
Present: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
Logan Vlasaty, Civil Engineer
Jared Voto, City Manager Representative
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
Bidder’s Name Bond Non-
Collusion
Intent to
Comply
Responsible
Contractor
Total Base Bid
Corrective Asphalt
Materials, LLC Yes Yes Yes Yes $486,200
The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the June
12, 2018 City Council Meeting.
________________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose City Clerk
LINE
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS EST. QTY. UNIT COST ($) TOTAL COST ($)
1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION #1 LS 1 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$
2 SPECIAL MALTENE BASED ASPHALT REJUVENATING AGENT SY 585,000 0.85$ 497,250.00$
Total 503,750.00$
Engineer's Estimate
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.D.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 96
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jack B roz, Transportation E ngineer
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
6/4/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the adoption of a resolution authorizing the 69th Street W est Pedestrian
Improvements Project application submission for Federal Surface Transportation Program (S TP)
funds under the Metropolitan Council's Regional Solicitation process.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The Metropolitan Council is currently accepting applications as part of the Regional Solicitation process for
federal funding of transportation projects through the Federal Highway Administration's Surface
Transportation Program (S TP). The 69th Street West Pedestrian I mprovements Project meets all of the
qualifications of the program under the category of "Pedestrian I nfrastructure." The infrastructure will include
the construction of a sidewalk, reconstruction of curbs, drainage, driveways, alleys and minor grading to
construct the sidewalk along this corridor.
W ith Council approval, staff is preparing to submit an application for the requested amount of $500,000 to be
contributed to the project. I f successful, funding could be applied to construction as early as 2022. The total
cost of the pedestrian improvements is approximately $500,000; however, if these grant funds are awarded for
pedestrian improvements staff will evaluate the potential need for any additional reconstruction activities based
on the current condition of the roadway and underground utilities along 69th Street.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By Motion: Adopt a re solution approv ing the submission of the 69th Stree t West Pe de strian
Improve me nts Project application submission for Fe de ral Surface Transportation Program
(STP) funds under the Metropolitan Council's Re gional Solicitation process.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Metropolitan Council and the Transportation Advisory Board have released the 2018 Solicitation
Package for federal funds. The regional solicitation process selects projects to be funded within the
following categories:
Roadway Expansion
Roadway Reconstruction/Modernization & Spot Mobility
Traffic Management Technologies (Roadway System Management)
Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement
Multi-use Trails & Bicycle Facilities
Pedestrian Facilities
Safe Routes to Schools
Transit Expansion
Travel Demand Management (2020 and 2021 funds)
Transit Modernization
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The 69th Street W est Pedestrian I mprovements Project is consistent with the following approved plans:
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 6 - Transportation)
Bicycle Master Plan
Street Reconstruction Guiding Principles Document
Complete Streets Policy
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The deadline for applications is J uly 13, 2018.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The construction cost of 69th Street W est Pedestrian I mprovements from Xerxes Avenue to Penn
Avenue is estimated to be $500,000. I f selected for S TP funds, up to $500,000 would be funded
with federal dollars and any remaining amount would be funded with other City sources.
Additional reconstruction activities may be considered by Council in the future if awarded the
grant dollars in which those activities would be funded with other City funds.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
None
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Council may choose not to adopt the resolution; therefore, not submit an application for the federal
funds.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE 69th STREET WEST
PEDESTRIAN PROJECT FUNDING APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield understands that 69th Street West from Xerxes
Avenue to Penn Avenue is designated as a Collector Roadway; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has a policy to provide a sidewalk on one side
of Collector Roadways; and
WHEREAS, 69th Street West from Xerxes Avenue to Penn Avenue does not
have a sidewalk; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has an approved Complete Streets Policy; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has completed a Guiding Principles process for
major transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has determined that the 69th Street Pedestrian
Improvements Project will create improved safety and mobility along the corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is currently accepting applications as part
of the Regional Solicitation process for federal funding of transportation projects through
the Federal Highway Administration’s Surface Transportation Program (STP); and
WHEREAS, the STP purpose aligns with the needed improvements on 69th
Street West from Xerxes Avenue to Penn Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Richfield approves the submission of the 69th Street Pedestrian Improvements Project
2018 Application for Federal Surface Transportation Program funds. The application
includes the construction of a sidewalk from Xerxes Avenue to Penn Avenue, along with
reconstruction of curbs, drainage, driveways, alleys approaches and minor grading to
construct the sidewalk along this corridor.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of
June, 2018.
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.E.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 97
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Myrt L ink, C ommunity D evelopment A ccountant
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
6/6/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the approval of an Amendment of Commercial Lease with the Minnesota Department
of Transportation and Amendment of License Agreement with Transmission Shop, Inc. for the parking
lot at Cedar Avenue and Diagonal Boulevard and authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute any
renewals of the Amendment of Commercial Lease and Amendment to License Agreement after June 30,
2020, without further Council consideration.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
I n 2001, the City of Richfield (City) worked with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnD OT) to
secure a commercial lease for the construction of a parking lot on excess MnD OT right-of-way. I n return, the
City leases the parking lot to the Transmission Shop, I nc. (Transmission Shop) located at 6958 Cedar Avenue
to remedy a neighborhood parking problem that occurred from the relocation of the business. The
Transmission Shop constructed the parking lot and has paid the taxes for the property since 2001. The
parking lot has been successful in remedying any parking problems that had existed in the neighborhood. The
agreement between all the parties has been successfully renewed every two-years at MnD OT’s request since
2001.
The City's original License Agreement with the Transmission Shop required a renewal of that Agreement until
at least 2006 so that the Transmission Shop's investment in constructing the parking lot could fully depreciate.
At this point, the City could choose not to renew the License Agreement, but City staff is not recommending
that course of action because MnD OT plans on retaining ownership of the underlying land in the eventuality
that Trunk Highway 77 might some day be widened. As such, any use of the site will be interim in nature and
the current use is likely the most reasonable interim use.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the Amendment of Commercial Le ase with the Minnesota De partme nt of
Transportation and Ame ndme nt of Lice nse Agree me nt with Transmission Shop, Inc. for the
parking lot at Cedar Ave nue and Diagonal Boulev ard and authorize the City Manager and
Mayor to ex ecute any renewals of the Ame ndme nt of Comme rcial Lease and Amendment to
Lice nse Agree me nt after June 30, 2020, without furthe r Council consideration.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
I n August 2001 the City approved a Commercial Lease between the City and MnD OT for the
construction of a parking lot on excess right-of-way land (45,750 sq. ft.) at approximately Cedar
Avenue and Diagonal Boulevard.
At the same time, the City also approved a License Agreement between the City and the
Transmission Shop for the use of the parking lot. The City pursued this arrangement with MnD OT
as a way to remedy neighborhood parking problems resulting from the relocation of a transmission
shop from 6409 Cedar Avenue to 6958 Cedar Avenue. The property located at 6409 Cedar
Avenue was acquired for the 66th Street/Trunk Highway 77 I nterchange bridge and ramp project.
The original Lease and License Agreements were set to expire on J une 30, 2006. The Lease and
License Agreements were continued via an amendment by the City Council in 2006, 2008, 2010,
2012, 2014 and 2016.
The parking lot has been successful over the years, remedying any parking problems in the area
and the Transmission Shop is interested in extending the License Agreement.
MnD OT has provided an amendment to the Lease to extend it for another two years, after which
time, additional extensions can be considered. The License Agreement is also being extended for
the same term.
Barring any redevelopment in the area or use of the excess land by MnD OT, it is understood by
all parties to the Lease and License Agreements that the excess land can be used until at least
2020.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The original Commercial Lease and License Agreements allow for term extensions.
Amendments to the Lease and License Agreements are set for another two years. Term
extensions can be made once the proposed term expires.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
MnD OT could terminate the Lease if the subject land is needed for highway purposes. Currently it
continues to be considered excess right-of-way.
The current Lease with MnD OT and License Agreement with The Transmission Shop are set to
expire on J une 30, 2018.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
There is no financial impact to the City.
Since this is essentially a "pass through" license agreement of a property we do not own, staff
does not believe that the City could charge rent for use of this site.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
Kennedy and Graven prepared the original License and the Amendment to the License
Agreement for the City.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Continue to lease the property from MnD OT, but discontinue the License Agreement permitting The
Transmission Shop use of the property.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
A mendment of C ommercial L ease - No 7 C ontract/A greement
Transmission S hop L icense A greement C ontract/A greement
AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 30, 2018, by and between
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Grantor”) and
the TRANSMISSION SHOP, INC., a Minnesota corporation (“Grantee), and amends that
certain License Agreement between Grantor and Grantee dated August 16, 2001.
Recitals
A. Grantor and Grantee entered into a License Agreement involving the use of certain land
at 6945 Cedar Avenue, Richfield, Minnesota, depicted on the attached Exhibit A.
B. The parties desire to extend the term of the License Agreement by this Amendment.
Terms
1. Effective on June 30, 2018, the License Agreement shall be renewed for a period of two
years, commencing on July 1, 2018 and continuing through June 30, 2020, with the right
of termination as set forth in the License Agreement.
2. The terms of the original License Agreement are expressly reaffirmed and remain in full
force and effect, except as modified by this Agreement.
GRANTOR
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
By___________________________
Pat Elliott, Mayor
By___________________________
Steven L. Devich, City Manager
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.F.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 98
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Julie Urban, Housing Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
6/5/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/5/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the adoption of a resolution supporting a Livable Communities Demonstration Act
grant application to the Metropolitan Council for the Cedar Point II housing project.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The Metropolitan Council has issued a Request for Proposals for its Livable Communities Demonstration
Account Fund (LC D A). The L C D A offers grants to support development projects that:
Connect housing, jobs, civic sites, retail centers and local/regional transportation systems.
Demonstrate a variety of housing densities, types & costs, creative placemaking,
environmentally sensitive development, and compact land use.
Catalyze additional development that efficiently uses land and infrastructure, and supports
vibrant, diverse communities.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority is working with NHH Companies, LLC (Developer) to redevelop
the Cedar Point I I housing area with 218 market-rate apartments and 64 townhomes affordable at 100%-
115% of the area median income. The Developer is proposing to submit a request for LC D A funds to support
components of the project that facilitate livability and connections to the neighborhood. Project concept
applications are due on J une 28, 2018, and a resolution of support is required with the application.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt a resolution supporting the submittal of a grant application to the Metropolitan
Council for Livable Communities Demonstration Act funds for the Cedar Point II housing project.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Cedar Corridor Redevelopment Area was established in 2004 to provide a transition between
the airport/commercial development areas to the east and the single-family residential areas to the
west.
The Developer is proposing to redevelop a portion of the Cedar Corridor between 65th and 63rd
Streets with the construction of high-density, multi-family housing along Richfield Parkway and
for-sale townhomes on 16th Avenue.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The Metropolitan Council requires the City to be the applicant and to submit a resolution in
support of the grant application.
I t is the City's policy to seek grant funding when available and as appropriate.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The grant application is due on J une 28, 2018, and a resolution of support needs to be submitted
as part of the application.
Approval of the concept application would be awarded in August. A decision on a final award
would be made in November.
Funds must be expended within two years of the grant award.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The Developer is in the process of determining the exact amount of the request.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The Pre-development Agreement approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
on March 19, 2018, requires the Developer to submit grant applications, as appropriate.
The City will be required to enter into a grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council, if funding
is awarded.
The City Attorney will review the grant agreement prior to execution.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Do not approve the resolution.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
N/A
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT (“LCDA”) FUNDING AND
AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City is a participant in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act
(“LCA”) Local Housing Incentives Account Program for 2018 as determined by the
Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to apply for LCA Livable Communities
Demonstration Account funds; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a proposed project(s) within the City that
meets LCDA purposes and criteria and are consistent with and promote the purposes of
the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council’s
adopted metropolitan development guide; and
WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to
adequately manage an LCDA grant; and
WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and
regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges LCDA grants are intended to fund projects or
project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes for LCDA
development or redevelopment elsewhere in the Region, and therefore represents that
the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in
other metropolitan-area communities; and
WHEREAS, only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the
Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities LCDA initiative during each funding cycle
and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce
grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of LCDA
grant funding.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and
due consideration, the governing body of the City:
1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s development goals and
priorities for the proposed LCDA Project(s) to occur at this particular site and at this
particular time.
2. Finds that the LCDA Project component(s) for which Livable Communities
LCDA funding is sought: (a) will not occur solely through private or other public
investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and (b) will occur within the term of
the grant award (two years for Pre-Development grants and three years for
Development grants) only if Livable Communities LCDA funding is made available for
this project(s) at this time.
3. Authorizes its staff to submit on behalf of the City one or more applications for
Metropolitan Council Livable Communities LCDA grant funds for the LCDA Project
components identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be
necessary to implement the LCDA Project on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of
June, 2018.
__________________________
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.G.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 99
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A ssistant C D D irector / Matt B rillhart, A ssociate
P lanner
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R
RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
6/6/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the approval of a first reading of an ordinance rezoning 6328 Aldrich Avenue from
Single-family Residential to Planned Mixed Use, related to a proposal for the former Lyndale Garden
Center property.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The Lyndale Garden Center closed its doors in 2006 and was purchased by The Cornerstone Group
(Applicant) in 2011. The Applicant has continued to work on the project, completing shoreline improvements
last year and now moving forward with partner North Bay Companies to redevelop the northern portion
of the site with a variety of housing types. In addition to the former Lyndale Garden Center land, the
Applicant has purchased one single family home to the north (6328 Aldrich Ave) and proposes
to include that property in the development. T he Applicant is requesting a change to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations in order to make that possible.
T his first reading is an administrative requirement and does not obligate the Council to approve the
ordinance upon second reading; nor does it obligate the Council to approve the Comprehensive
Plan amendment or specific land use plans. T he second reading, Comprehensive Plan amendment,
and final development plans will be considered by the Council on June 26, 2018.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve a first reading of an ordinance that ame nds Richfield Zoning Code
Appendix I to designate 6328 Aldrich Ave nue as Planne d Mix ed Use .
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Lyndale Garden Center closed in 2006 and this site suffered frequent vandalism and
occasional criminal activity for many years.
The Applicant purchased the property in 2011 and has been working steadily toward
redevelopment since that time.
The Applicant has held a number of open houses related to the proposed condominium project
and an open house related to both the condominium and apartment portions of the development on
May 12, 2018.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District Designations
The Comprehensive Plan is an expression of the Community's vision for the future. This site is located
within the Lakes at Lyndale area of the City. For many years, this has been considered Richfield's
downtown and redevelopment has been a priority. The rezoning of this property cannot take place without
approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. This first reading is an administrative requirement and
does not obligate the Council to approve the ordinance upon second reading.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
60-D AY RUL E: The 60-day clock 'started' when a complete application was received on May 14,
2018. A decision is required by J uly 13, 2018, or the Council must notify the Applicant that it is
extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 days total) for issuing a
decision.
A second reading of the proposed ordinance is scheduled for J une 26, 2018, alongside
consideration of other required land use approvals.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
Required application fees have been paid.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on May 29, 2018. Notice of the public
hearing was published in the Sun Current newspaper and mailed to properties within 500 feet of
the site. No members of the public spoke at the public hearing.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed rezoning (7-0).
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
City Council may reject the proposed ordinance.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Representatives of The Cornerstone Group
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Ordinance - Rezone 6328 A ldrich Ave Ordinance
P lans - Master P UD & C ondominiums (L akeside)E xhibit
P lans - A partment/Townhome E xhibit
A pplicant Narrative E xhibit
Zoning/C omp P lan Map E xhibit
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING;
AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY
CODE BY REZONING 6328 ALDRICH AVENUE
FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R)
TO PLANNED MIXED USE (PMU)
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 8, Paragraph 3 of Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code is
amended to read as follows:
(3) M-3 (Lyndale Gardens Area). Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Block 1 and Outlots
B and C, Lyndale Gardens Addition.
Sec. 2. Section 8, Appendix 1 of the Richfield Zoning Code is amended to
add a new Paragraph 8 to read as follows:
(8) M-3 (Lyndale Gardens Area). Lots 1-3, Block 1, Lyndale Gardens
2nd Addition.
Sec. 3. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the
Richfield City Charter.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of June,
2018.
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
site plan0'10'20'40'ntwentyREVISIONSDATE ISSUED : 04/14/2018JOB NO.FILE NAMEREG. NO.42162SignedI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyregistered Landscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS275 East Fourth Street, Suite 800, St. Paul, MN 55101p 651.225.8623 f 651.225.8720 www.cermakrhoades.coma u n e f e r n a n d e zl a n d s c a p ea r c h i t e c t s705 raymond avenue : suite 200suite 200 : st. paul : MN : 55114651.248.6155 or 651.341.3611LAKESIDE at LYNDALE GARDENSTHE CORNERSTONE GROUP RICHFIELD, MN DATE:01/03/2018NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY SITE PLAN REVIEWRESUBMITTAL 04/14/2018L1.0calculationsBUILDING COVERAGEBUILDING AREA = 16,026 sq. ft.LOT AREA = 79,716 sq. ft.BUILDING COVERAGE PERCENTAGE = 20.1%IMPERVIOUS SURFACETOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA= 38,888 sq. ft.BUILDING AREA = 16,026 sq. ft.SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA=22,862 sq. ft.LOT AREA = 79,716 sq. ft.IMPERVIOUS COVER PERCENTAGE = 48.8%proposed buildingproposed garageffe: 844.25lle: 833.25proposed buildingffe: 844.25lle: 833.25ffe: 843.00pondpondalleybryant avenue southaldrich avenue southdddddddd10'-0"FENCE75LAKE SETBACKLOCKABLE ARM GATE15'-1"8'-3"9'-6"17'-0"GREEN24'-0"22'-0"GREENSIDEWALKCONNECTORSTAIRSW/ RAILINGS &BIKE RUNWAYGAS FIRE PITGATHERING AREABLACK VINYLCOATED CHAIN LINKC.I.P.CONCRETERETAINING WALLSGARAGE ENTRYTERRACE TYP.DECK TYP.DECK TYP.TERRACE TYP.19'-0"9'-0"5'-0"5'-0"LAKE SETBACK35'-9"35'-9"7'-8"17'-7"48'-9"11'-0"R5'-
0"BOLLARDS TYP.CAST IN PLACECONC. PAVERS TYP.DETECTABLEWARNINGSTRIPCONCRETE WALKS TYP.5'-0"CAST IN PLACECONC. PAVERS TYP.CONCRETEWALKS TYP.OFF LEASHDOG AREAUNLEASHING AREA5'-0"STAIRS W/ RAILINGSDN 2RDN 10RDN 5RDN 4RMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALLROLL OUT RECYCLE ANDREFUSE CONTAINER AREAPROPERTY LINEPROP
E
R
T
Y
LI
N
E
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING TREES TYP.EXISTING TREES TYP.BICYCLE PARKING(2)BITUMIOUS PAVINGSPLASH RIP RAP TYP.SPLASH RIP RAP TYP.PLANTING BED EDGINGPLANTING BED EDGINGGAURDRAIL TYP.GAURDRAIL TYP.EXISTING TREES TYP.EXISTING TREES TYP.PED PAVEMENTMARKING
landscape plan0'10'20'40'ntwentyREVISIONSDATE ISSUED : 04/14/2018JOB NO.FILE NAMEREG. NO.42162SignedI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyregistered Landscape Architect under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS275 East Fourth Street, Suite 800, St. Paul, MN 55101p 651.225.8623 f 651.225.8720 www.cermakrhoades.coma u n e f e r n a n d e zl a n d s c a p ea r c h i t e c t s705 raymond avenue : suite 200suite 200 : st. paul : MN : 55114651.248.6155 or 651.341.3611LAKESIDE at LYNDALE GARDENSTHE CORNERSTONE GROUP RICHFIELD, MN DATE:01/03/2018NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY SITE PLAN REVIEWRESUBMITTAL 04/14/2018L2.01conifer. treescale: nts3shrub plantingscale: ntsscale: nts4plant spacingscale: nts1key notesLANDSCAPE EDGING SHALL BE 4" CLEAN LINE MILL FINISH ALUMINUM EDGING IN ALLPLANTING BEDSHARDWOOD SHREDDED MULCH; APPLY TO A 4" DEPTH WITH PELLET WEED PREVENTER.2 12" DRESSER TRAP ROCK INSTALLED TO A 4" DEPTH ON NON-WOVEN GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC.AREAS ON PLAN SHOWN AS HATCH.IRRIGATION: PROVIDE IRRIGATION FOR SOD AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES FOR100 % COVERAGE. IRRIGATION IN SHRUB AREAS IS DRIP IRRIGATION. REFER TO DESIGN BUILDIRRIGATION SPECIFICATION. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDINGHEAD LAYOUT, SPACING, TYPE, BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS, POINT OFCONNECTION, SLEEVES, CONTROLLER, VALVE BOX LOCATIONS, ZONE INDICATIONS ANDPIPE SIZING. PROVIDE ON-SITE OPERATION TUTORIAL FOR OWNER AN INCLUDE ALLMANUALS AND INFORMATION ON THE SYSTEM2342decid. tree1.CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES, SHAPES AND LOCATIONS OF BEDS, AND ADJUST AS REQUIRED TO CONFORMTO THE SITE CONDITIONS. CONFIRM ANY ADJUSTMENTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.2.LOCATE ALL UTILITIES. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH NEWCONSTRUCTION.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FROM THE SITE ALL SOD/TURF WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR NEWPLANT BEDS. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN ANDWATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED.4.THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. ADVISE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID DAMAGING EXISTING TREES. DO NOT STORE OR DRIVE HEAVYMATERIALS OVER TREE ROOTS. DO NOT DAMAGE TREE BARK OR BRANCHES.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, FIXTURES AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ANYDAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE PROJECT SITESHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF CONSTRUCTION WASTES AND DEBRIS.7.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THEWORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. MULCH, PLANTING SOIL AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS PLANTING COMPONENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE RELATED PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES.8.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING AND ALL PLANT CARE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THEOWNER.9.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS ISCOMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PLANTING IS ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE10.MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, WEEDING, MULCHING,REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIAL PRIOR TO GROWING SEASON, RE-SETTING PLANTS AND PROPER GRADE,AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUMEMAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FORKEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.11.WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILLTHOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK AND SOD EVERY OTHER DAY UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THEOWNER. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEATSTRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINENEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER.planting notesAALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 12" PULVERIZED LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW MN DOT SPEC.3877-2B ENHANCE WITH AGED AND SCREEN COMPOSTALL SODDED(LAWN) AREA SHALL RECEIVE 6" MIN. COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW MN DOT SPEC.3877-1Asoil notesBplanting schedule111212121212121241414444444444PLANTINGS PER DETAILS 1-4, L2.0107` BBJV4#10 Cont.CS43" BBAA23" BBAA23" BBAA33" BBAA77` BBJV23 1/2" BBQB18#5 Cont.AM12.5 " BBMH22.5 " BBMH16#5 Cont.AM17` ClumpAX217` ClumpAX217` ClumpAX217` ClumpAX217` ClumpAX217` ClumpAX217` ClumpAX218#3 Cont.PN28#3 Cont.PN3#7 Cont.HA26#1 Cont.HM7#5 Cont.RG224" BBTT3#7 Cont.HA724" BBTT57#1 Cont.HM57#1 Cont.HM3#7 Cont.HA41#1 Cont.SH2724" BBTT3#7 Cont.HA13#5 Cont.AM36#5 Cont.RG17#5 Cont.AM45#5 Cont.RG414` ClumpBPO22.5 " BBMH62.5 " BBMH324" BBTT4#7 Cont.HA3#7 Cont.HA20#1 Cont.HM14#5 Cont.RG224" BBTT224" BBTT29#1 Cont.HM64#1 Cont.HM31#5 Cont.MD27#5 Cont.MD91#1 Cont.HM624" BBTTproposed buildingproposed garageffe: 844.25lle: 833.25proposed buildingffe: 844.25lle: 833.25ffe: 843.00pondpondalleybryant avenue southaldrich avenue south32#5 Cont.RGdddddddd8#5 Cont.AM67` BBJV37` BBJV1#10 Cont.CSSOD LAWNSOD LAWNSOD LAWNSOD LAWNMOW LINENO MOW FESCUENATIVE WILDFLOWER SEEDNATIVE WILDFLOWER SEEDNO MOW FESCUETREESCODEBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONTQTY AAAcer x freemanii `Jeffsred` / Autumn Blaze Maple3" BB11H 50` W40` AX2Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` / `Autumn Brilliance` Serviceberry7` Clump7 BPOBetula populifolia `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch14` Clump7 JVJuniperus virginiana / Eastern Red Cedar7` BB22 MHMalus x `Harvest Gold` / Crab Apple2.5 " BB11 QBQuercus bicolor / Swamp White Oak3 1/2" BB2SHRUBSCODEBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMESIZEQTY AMAronia melanocarpa elata / Glossy Black Chokeberry#5 Cont.74 CSCornus sericea `Cardinal` / `Cardinal` Red-twig Dogwood#10 Cont.6 HAHydrangea arborescens `Annabelle` / Annabelle Smooth Hydrangea#7 Cont.19HT 4` W 4` MDMicrobiota decussata / Siberian Carpet Cypress#5 Cont.58 RGRhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac#5 Cont.134HT 3` W 5` TTTaxus x media `Tauntonii` / Tauton Yew24" BB34ANNUALS/PERENNIALSCODEBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMESIZEQTY HMHosta x `August Moon` / Plantain Lily#1 Cont.360 PNPanicum virgatum `North Wind` / Northwind Switch Grass#3 Cont.46 SH2Sporobolus heterolepis / Prairie Dropseed#1 Cont.41GROUND COVERSCODEBOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAMECONTSPACINGQTY PPPoa pratensis / Kentucky Bluegrasssod13,155 sf FLSeed Mix / Native Wildflower and Grass Mixseed14,565 sfEQ.EQ.EQ.EQ.60 PLANSECTION6"NOTE: SPACING PER PLANCUT SLITS IN ORGANIC CONTAINERTO FACILITATE ROOT PENETRATION.IF CONTAINER IS NON-ORGANIC,REMOVE COMPLETELY.PLANTING SOILFINISHED GRADEMULCH (4" DEEP), REFER TO SPECIFICATIONLOOSENED SUBSOILSUBSOILTYPICAL OFFSET SPACING90
TYPICAL GRID SPACINGSODSUBGRADETOPSOIL REFER TO SPECIFICATIONMULCH (4" DEEP) (TYPICAL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP) POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL,16" POLYPROPYLENE OR AT OPPOSITE SIDES WIRE, 2 SPACED EQUALLYDOUBLE STRAND 14 GA.6'-0" STEEL STAKE12" MIN18" MIN.2'-0" MIN.4'-0"+/-NOTES:1.IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.2.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING.3.DO NOT PLANT TOO DEEP: EXPOSE TOP OF ROOT FLARE AND PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK.ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADETOPSOIL, PER SPECIFICATIONCUT ALL ROPES AND REMOVEINORGANIC CONTAINERSROOT FLARE SHALL BE EXPOSED AND SET AT GRADE PER PLANTOPSOIL, PER SPECIFICATIONTOPSOILGROUND COVER REFER TO SPECIFICATIONAPPROVED SUBGRADENOTES:1.HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYPICAL).2.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING.3.SHRUBS TO SIT ON SUBGRADE.4.APPLY PELLET WEED PREVENTER PRIOR TO MULCHING.SLIT ORGANIC CONTAINER,OR REMOVE INORGANIC CONT.MULCH 4" DEPTH, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONSUBGRADEROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE SET AT ANGLEWOOD OR STEEL STAKETOPSOILTOPSOIL, PER SPECIFICATIONMULCH (4" DEEP) REFER TO SPECIFICATIONFLAGGING (ONE PER WIRE)16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP) (TYPICAL)6'-0" STEEL STAKE18" MIN.VARIES2'-0" MIN.NOTES:1.CONIFER TO HAVESHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCHUNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE. NOMULCH TO BE INCONTACT WITH TRUNK.2.SCARIFY BOTTOM ANDSIDES OF HOLE PRIORTO PLANTING.3.TWO ALTERNATEMETHODS OF TREESTAKING AREILLUSTRATED.4.IT IS THE CONTRACTORSOPTION TO STAKETREES; HOWEVER, THECONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES INA PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THEGUARANTEE PERIOD.5.DO NOT PLANT TOODEEP: EXPOSE TOP OFROOT FLARE AND PULLMULCH AWAY FROMTRUNK.CUT ALL ROPES AND REMOVEINORGANIC CONTAINERSLAWN WIRE, 3'-0" @ 120'DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. INTERVALS (TYPICAL)
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.31.00.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.70.80.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.20.60.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.20.20.30.60.52.40.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.40.62.20.64.10.70.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.60.71.02.40.20.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.07.81.61.22.80.20.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.01.92.90.63.90.70.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.05.42.10.52.50.60.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.22.52.00.60.10.30.50.10.30.60.30.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.71.31.61.21.10.80.63.91.00.60.40.20.64.60.80.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.81.21.71.40.90.40.72.60.80.20.10.20.41.60.50.10.00.00.00.00.00.05.00.60.60.91.52.31.40.93.21.10.40.20.10.10.20.20.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.80.60.50.50.50.71.83.42.01.23.51.10.40.20.20.20.30.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.02.40.80.81.10.52.11.30.71.33.72.01.11.02.40.70.40.40.40.73.10.80.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.50.60.60.50.71.10.60.63.41.80.80.91.61.81.11.14.71.00.70.90.91.14.01.00.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.92.44.60.80.91.21.11.00.81.21.31.31.21.31.41.21.00.91.11.52.52.41.31.00.60.30.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.50.40.60.41.01.41.22.22.31.81.32.02.22.82.41.51.41.21.11.01.42.73.82.51.10.90.60.40.20.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.14.80.64.51.20.30.30.50.91.02.03.22.51.61.81.73.03.42.11.41.41.11.01.21.21.31.71.40.90.70.50.30.20.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.80.50.41.30.60.20.30.40.60.70.81.11.21.21.31.21.41.31.11.11.11.11.21.21.51.61.21.10.90.60.40.20.10.10.00.00.10.20.70.40.50.71.14.50.50.20.10.20.20.10.20.20.30.40.40.60.81.11.21.11.01.01.11.21.21.21.21.43.13.72.11.00.70.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.10.53.21.31.94.70.91.80.40.10.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.20.30.71.82.32.02.62.02.42.22.22.51.61.21.62.32.51.30.70.40.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.20.80.50.50.80.30.20.10.10.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.31.04.96.33.93.85.34.67.42.20.90.90.90.90.60.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.30.30.30.30.20.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC1SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"Calculation Summary - Lyndale GardensLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinMax/MinENTRANCE 1IlluminanceFc9.1410.66.61.61IlluminanceFc9.2210.76.71.60IlluminanceFc9.2610.76.51.65IlluminanceFc9.2610.76.51.65IlluminanceFc9.2510.76.51.65IlluminanceFc9.2110.76.41.67GARAGE ENTRANCE AIlluminanceFc7.778.95.21.71GARAGE ENTRANCE BIlluminanceFc7.438.95.21.71NORTH PROPERTY LINEIlluminanceFc0.110.80.0N.A.PARKING LOTIlluminanceFc1.543.80.312.67B1WP1P2ENTRANCE 2ENTRANCE 3ENTRANCE 4ENTRANCE 5ENTRANCE 6GENERAL NOTESA.REFER TO SHEET E0.2A, FOR FIXTURE SCHEDULE AND BOLLARD/POLE BASE DETAIL.B.LIGHTING LEVELS SHOWN ARE MAINTAINED. LIGHT LOSS FACTOR OF 0.90WAS USED TO ACCOUNT FOR DIRT AND LUMEN DEPRECIATION.C.ALL EXTERIOR FIXTURES SHALL BE CONTROLLED VIA PHOTOCELL. CONTROL STRATEGYEMPLOYED SHALL COMPLY WITH MN ENERGY CODE.D.ENTRANCE STATISTICS ARE TAKEN WITHIN A RADIUS OF 5' OF THE ENTRANCE.PRIMARY ENTRANCES INDICATED BY:GENERAL NOTESX123456ABB1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1B1P2P2P2P1W1W1W1W1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1D1SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRICREVISIONSDATE ISSUEDJOB NO.REG. NO.DATESignedI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyregistered Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.CERMAK RHOADES
ARCHITECTS
275 East Fourth Street, Suite 800, St. Paul, MN 5510 1
p 651.225.8623 f 651.225.8720
www.cermakrhoades.comNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONLAKESIDE AT LYNDALE GARDENS
THE CORNERSTONE GROUP
04/20/20184144.0000E0.2
GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM BALCONY WITH WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREENMETAL GUARDRAIL WITH GLASS INFILL, TYP.GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.STOREFRONT, TYP. AT SHARED ENTRANCESMETAL GATE, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM BALCONY, TYP.GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM BALCONY WITH WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREENMETAL GUARDRAIL WITH GLASS INFILL, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.`boj^h=oel^abp=^o`efqb`qp=275 East Fourth Street, Suite 800, St Paul MN 55101p 651 225 8623 f 651 225 8720 www.cermakrhoades.comI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of theState of MinnesotaSigned:Revisions:Date issued:Job No:Date:License No:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPrinted Name:04-20-18EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING AA4.11709LAKESIDE AT LYNDALE GARDENSTHE CORNERSTONE GROUP12/19/09ApproverApprover 1/8" = 1'-0"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING A 1/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING A 1/8" = 1'-0"3SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING A 1/8" = 1'-0"4WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING A
GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM BALCONY WITH WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREENMETAL GUARDRAIL WITH GLASS INFILL, TYP.GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.STOREFRONT, TYP. AT SHARED ENTRANCESMETAL GATE, TYPWOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.`boj^h=oel^abp=^o`efqb`qp=275 East Fourth Street, Suite 800, St Paul MN 55101p 651 225 8623 f 651 225 8720 www.cermakrhoades.comI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of theState of MinnesotaSigned:Revisions:Date issued:Job No:Date:License No:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPrinted Name:04-20-18EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING BA4.21709LAKESIDE AT LYNDALE GARDENSTHE CORNERSTONE GROUP04/19/18ApproverApprover 1/8" = 1'-0"2EAST ELEVATION - BUILDING B 1/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING B
GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM BALCONY WITH WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING AT PRIVACY SCREENMETAL GUARDRAIL WITH GLASS INFILL, TYP.GARAGE100' - 0"FIRST FLOOR110' - 11 7/8"SECOND FLOOR121' - 7 3/4"THIRD FLOOR133' - 7"WOOD TEXTURE FIBER CEMENT SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, TYP.SMOOTH FIBER CEMENT PANEL, TYP.WINDOW PER SCHEDULE, TYP.MANUFACTURED ALUMINUM BALCONY, TYP.`boj^h=oel^abp=^o`efqb`qp=275 East Fourth Street, Suite 800, St Paul MN 55101p 651 225 8623 f 651 225 8720 www.cermakrhoades.comI hereby certify that this plan, specification,or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of theState of MinnesotaSigned:Revisions:Date issued:Job No:Date:License No:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONPrinted Name:04-20-18EXTEROR ELEVATIONS - BUILDING BA4.31709LAKESIDE AT LYNDALE GARDENSTHE CORNERSTONE GROUP04/19/18ApproverApprover 1/8" = 1'-0"2WEST ELEVATION - BUILDING B 1/8" = 1'-0"1SOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING B
PROJECT
INFORMATION
PROJECT DATA
SITE AREA: 58,400 SF
APARTMENTS:
4 stories -- 48’-4”
66 Units
Building Gross Area
Level 1 (including garage) 14,468 sf
Level 2 12,918 sf
Level 3 12,918 sf
Level 4 12,918 sf
Gross Area with Garage 53,222 sf
TOWNHOMES:
2 stories -- 24’-3 3/4”
8 Units -- 6 - 3 BD and 2 - 2BD
Building Gross Area
Level 1 5,852 sf
Level 2 5,824 sf
Gross Area 11,676 sf
LYNDALE
GARDENS
APARTMENTS
RICHFIELD, MN
MAY 14, 2018
DJR ARCHITECTURE, INC.
333 WASHINGTON AVE. N
UNION PLAZA, SUITE 210
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
PLANNING & ZONING
APPLICATION
Parking Provided
Total Indoor Parking Spaces 27 spaces
Total Outdoor Parking Spaces 55 spaces
Grand total: 82 spaces
845.4839.7
846.48
4
2
.
4 843.9843.6841.5840.1845.8843.7845.7
843.68
4
4
.
2
840.1
8
4
2
.
3 840.2841.6842.9842.54845.5843.68
4
2
.
6 843.9844.58
4
1
.
9843.18
4
4
.
1
F
F
E
849.7XXXXXXXX>>COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.EOF=843.94REMOVE EXISTINGTREE AND BALL ROOT,TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPLANTERSREMOVE EXISTING SIGNREMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL ANDPARKING SIGNS, TYP.REMOVE EX BUILDING, STRUCTURES,FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS & BASEMATERIALS, PER LOCAL STATE & FEDERALSTANDARDS. REMOVE/DISCONNECT ALLSERVICES & UTILITIES PER UTILITYCOMPANY AND/OR L.G.U. STANDARDSEXISTING LIGHTPOLE TO REMAIN.PROTECTTHROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.REMOVE WOOD FENCEREMOVE WOOD FENCEREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE, TYP.ALL UNUSED EXISTING WATER SERVICESWITHIN THE PROPOSED LIMITS SHALL BEREMOVED AND ABANDONED BACK TO THEMAIN PER CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS STANDARDSSAWCUT ADJACENTPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL AND REMOVE EX.MEDIAN SECTIONCOORD. REMOVALS W/OFFSITE CONSTRUCTION BYOTHERSREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLEREMOVE EXISTINGWATER SERVICE PERCITY STANDARDS.REMOVE EX. C&G, TYP.REMOVE EX. C&G, TYP.REMOVE EX. C&G, TYP.REMOVE EX. C&G, TYP.REMOVE EX. C&G, TYP.LOCATE AND PROTECTOR RELOCATE EXISTINGUNDERGROUNDTELECOM LINE.LOCATE AND PROTECTOR RELOCATE EXISTINGUNDERGROUNDTELECOM LINE.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE ANDLOCAL REGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEARESTJOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AREAPPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THEDURATION OF THE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ONTHE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING,DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THEPLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN AMANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT,DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITYMATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALLCIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALLINCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.CITY OF RICHFIELD REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.REMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION04/20/18PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATIONLYNDALE GARDENS
LYNDALE AVENUE, RICHFIELD, MN
5324 OLIVER AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
THE CORNERSTONE GROUP INC
PROJECT
........................PROJECT NUMBER:1807944263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/20/18DJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN5/14/18ARC REVISION 1..........GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.11
X XXXXXXXXX>>COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)COM(UG)>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DECKDECKDECKPATIOPATIOPATIOPROPOSED BUILDINGCONC. WALK, TYP.UPGARAGE27 PARKINGSPACESCOMMON AREALOUNGE1,205 SFMECH.ELEC.APT. TRASHUNIT S-1516 SFBIKEROOMFITNESSROOMTOWN-HOMETRASHROOMUNIT S-1516 SFUNIT S-1516 SFR3
.
0
'R3.0'R2.0'R
3
.
0
'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'R10.0
'R10.0'24.0'
24.0'19.0'24.0'19.0'24.0'19.0'9.0'9.0'24.0'6.7'19.0'24.0'22.0'8.0'22.0'8.0'12.0'8.0'19.0'11.0'
4.0'8.0'6.0'6.0'8.0'4.0'6.0'8.0'
4.0'
6.0'
12.0'8.0'24.0'
NO
PARKINGCONC. PATIOCONC. WALK, TYP.CONC. WALK, TYP.CONC. WALK, TYP.CONC. WALK, TYP.19.0'CONC. PATIO9.3'B6-12 C&G, TYP.CONC. PATIOCONC. PATIOB6-12 C&G, TYP.3' CURB TAPERCURB CUTB6-12 C&G, TYP.B6-12 C&G, TYP.B6-12 C&G, TYP.MATCH EX. CONC.WALKMATCH EX. BIT PAVEMENTMATCH EX. CONC. WALK.MATCH EX. C&GMATCH EX. C&GMATCH EX. CONC. WALK.MATCH EX. CONC. WALK.MATCH EX. CONC. WALK.MATCH EX. CONC. WALK.COORD. CONSTRUCTION OFCONC. WALK ALONG PROPBOUNDARIES WITH ADJACENTPROPERTY CONSTRUCTION.9.0'COORD. CONSTRUCTION OFCONC. WALK ALONG PROPBOUNDARIES WITH ADJACENTPROPERTY CONSTRUCTION.COORD. CONSTRUCTION OF CONC.WALK, C&G, BIT. DRIVE, AND ADAPED RAMPS ALONG PROPBOUNDARIES WITH ADJACENTPROPERTY CONSTRUCTION.CONC. WALK, TYP.MECH. EQUIPMENT PAD.COORD W/ ARCH AND MECH'LCONC. WALK, TYP.40.4'10 SPACES @ 9.0' = 90.0'9 SPACES @ 9.0' = 81.0'
6.0'150.4'10 SPACES @ 9.0' = 90.0'7 SPACES @ 9.0' = 63.0'18.0'60.5'R6.
0
'CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.ADJ. SITE TO BE DESIGNEDAND CONSTRUCTED BYOTHERSADJ. SITE TO BE DESIGNEDAND CONSTRUCTED BYOTHERSADJ. SITE TO BE DESIGNEDAND CONSTRUCTED BYOTHERSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.12.0'8.0'CONC. PATIO8.4'22.0'12.0'12.0'6.0'12.0'14.6'8.5'8.6'19.3'19.6'10.0'12.0'20.5'13.9'12.1'
12.0'
6.0'AC UNITSAC UNITS45.0'EOF=843.94R3.0'R3
.
0
'R3.0'3' CURBTAPER3' CURBTAPERAC UNITS14' CURB TAPERCONC. WALK, TYP.9.0'6' CEDAR SCREENING FENCE6' CEDAR SCREENING FENCERIBBONCURB18' CURBTAPER18' CURBTAPER12.0'CONC. WALK, TYP.MATCH EX. C&GPED RAMP PER CITY AND ADASTANDARDS. TRUNCATEDDOMES TO FOLLOW CURBRADIUS.DEAD END CURB INTOEXISTING PAVEMENTR10.0'R15.0'1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS,UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FORTHE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTSSHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAYAND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATIONOF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FORREVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION.LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALSSUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES,LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLEDMATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITHA.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THEFLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE INCOLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITEIMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIPLINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSCITY OF RICHFIELD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION04/20/18PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATIONLYNDALE GARDENS
LYNDALE AVENUE, RICHFIELD, MN
5324 OLIVER AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
THE CORNERSTONE GROUP INC
PROJECT
........................PROJECT NUMBER:1807944263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.04/20/18DJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN5/14/18ARC REVISION 1..........SITE AREA TABLE:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCALCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOOPERATIONAL NOTES:SNOW REMOVAL:ALL SNOW SHALL REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR ON SITEIN THE LAWN SPACE LABELED ON THE LANDSCAPEPLAN.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: AT THE GARAGEENTRANCE DRIVE, OR BINS WILL BE ROLLED OUT TOTHE CURB AREA NEAR THE DRIVEWAY APRONCONNECTING TO LYNDALE.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE GARAGEENTRANCE DRIVE OF THE WESTERN BUILDING.1111
XXXXXXX>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>UPGARAGE27 PARKINGSPACESCOMMON AREALOUNGE1,205 SFMECH.ELEC.APT. TRASHUNIT S-1516 SFBIKEROOMFITNESSROOMTOWN-HOMETRASHROOMUNIT S-1516 SFUNIT S-1516 SFNOPARKING
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,TYP.EOF=843.94LANDSCAPE AREA: 121 SFLANDSCAPE AREA: 83 SFLANDSCAPE AREA: 138 SFLANDSCAPE AREA: 133 SFLANDSCAPE AREA: 48 SFLANDSCAPE AREA: 72 SF30 - NCB1 - SHL5 - BHS6 - BHS5 - NRM6 - AC7 - KFG14 - KFG1 - ABS1 - PFC1 - ABS1 - PFC1 - ABS1 - SSRB1 - SSRB1 - SSRB1 - SSRB1 - SHL1 - SHL1 - SHL1 - SHL2 - SHL6 - SSD6 - CS3 - SSD3 - SSD3 - CS6 - SSD8 - SSD6 - CS6 - SSD6 - SSD6 - CS8 - SSD18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.LAWNLAWNLAWNLAWNLAWNLAWNLAWNEDGING, TYP.EDGING, TYP.EDGING, TYP.EDGING, TYP.13 - KFG1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN AMINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.4.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE ANDDISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.5.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.6.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACTSHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.7.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER TOPSOIL LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.8.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINALLOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.9.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.10.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.11.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.12.REPAIR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROM LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.13.PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALLPROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THEEDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INLCUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.LANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN5/14/18ARC REVISION 1..........PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITESYMQUANT.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTCOMMENTSDECIDUOUS TREESNRM5NORTHWOOD RED MAPLEAcer rubrum 'Northwood'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHL7SKYLINE HONEYLOCUSTGleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSSRB4SHILOH SPLASH RIVER BIRCHBetula nigra 'Shiloh Splash'2.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMORNAMENTAL TREESPFC2PRAIRIEFIRE FLOWERING CRABMalus 'Prairiefire'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMABS3AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRYAmelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance (tree form)'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMEVERGREEN TREESBHS11BLACK HILLS SPRUCEPicea glauca 'Densata'6' ht.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHRUBS - CONIFEROUS & EVERGREENAC6ALPINE CURRANTRibes alpinum24" HT.CONT.NCB30NORTHERN CHARM BOXWOODBuxus 'Wilson'24" HT.CONT.PERENNIALS & GRASSESKFG34KARL FOERSTER GRASSCalamagrostis x acutiflora "Karl Foerster"#1CONT.SSD36STELLA SUPREME DAYLILYHemerocallis 'Stella Supreme'#1CONT.CS21CARADONNA SALVIASalvia x sylvestris 'Caradonna'#1CONT.LEGENDPROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEESCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESSODDECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA.PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBSYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES ANDPLANTING SIZESPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEESCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH, SAMPLES REQUIREDPROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLANSHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH, SAMPLES REQUIREDPROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLANGOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651) 454-0002 LOCAL4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003COPYRIGHT 2015 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION04/20/18PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATIONLYNDALE GARDENS
LYNDALE AVENUE, RICHFIELD, MN
5324 OLIVER AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419
THE CORNERSTONE GROUP INC
PROJECT
........................PROJECT NUMBER:1807924904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.04/20/18DJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comSEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL,PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 34-262 WET PRAIRIE, PER MNDOTSEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MAINTENANCE STRIP OVER FILTERFABRIC, SAMPLES REQUIRED. PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLANLANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS:11111
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
FLOOR PLANSNOPARKINGUP
GARAGE
27 PARKING
SPACES
COMMON
AREA
LOUNGE
1,205 SF
MECH.
ELEC.
APT. TRASH
PATIO
38 PARKING
SPACES
UNIT S-1
516 SF
TRANSIT
PLAZA
BIKE
ROOM
FITNESS
ROOM
TOWN-
HOME
TRASH
ROOM
UNIT S-1
516 SF
UNIT S-1
516 SF
PATIO
UNIT E:
1ST - 796 SF
2ND - 797 SF
TOTAL: 1,593 SF
UNIT A:
1ST - 744 SF
2ND - 735 SF
TOTAL: 1,479 SF
UNIT B:
1ST - 750 SF
2ND - 750 SF
TOTAL: 1,500 SF
UNIT C:
1ST - 636 SF
2ND - 630 SF
TOTAL: 1,266 SF
UNIT C:
1ST - 636 SF
2ND - 630 SF
TOTAL: 1,266 SF
UNIT B:
1ST - 750 SF
2ND - 750 SF
TOTAL: 1,500 SF
UNIT A:
1ST - 744 SF
2ND - 735 SF
TOTAL: 1,479 SF
UNIT D:
1ST - 796 SF
2ND - 797 SF
TOTAL: 1,593 SF
17 PARKING
SPACES
CONNECTION TO FUTURE COMMERCIAL
PARKING LOT FOR OVERFLOW PARKING ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, Inc.C B AD
4
3
2
1 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEPRINT NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA110FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA18-017.002018-05-09AuthorCheckerLYNDALE GARDENSApproverDesigner2018-05-09 1/16" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
UP WDWDWD1BD-1
675 SF
TR.
ROOF
BELOW
UNIT S5
484 SF
UNIT S4
474 SF
UNIT S3
574 SF
UNIT S2
493 SF
UNIT S2
507 SF
UNIT S2
507 SF
UNIT S2
495 SF
UNIT S2
507 SF
UNIT S2
507 SF
UNIT S2
494 SF
UNIT 1BD-4
617 SF UNIT S6
427 SF
UNIT S6
427 SF
UNIT 1BD-3
604 SF
UNIT 1BD-2
607 SF
UNIT S2
502 SF
UNIT S2
505 SF
UNIT S2
505 SF
UNIT S2
505 SF
UNIT S2
506 SF
UNIT E:
1ST - 796 SF
2ND - 797 SF
TOTAL: 1,593 SF
UNIT A:
1ST - 744 SF
2ND - 735 SF
TOTAL: 1,479 SF
UNIT B:
1ST - 750 SF
2ND - 750 SF
TOTAL: 1,500 SF
UNIT C:
1ST - 636 SF
2ND - 630 SF
TOTAL: 1,266 SF
UNIT C:
1ST - 636 SF
2ND - 630 SF
TOTAL: 1,266 SF
UNIT B:
1ST - 750 SF
2ND - 750 SF
TOTAL: 1,500 SF
UNIT A:
1ST - 744 SF
2ND - 735 SF
TOTAL: 1,479 SF
UNIT D:
1ST - 796 SF
2ND - 797 SF
TOTAL: 1,593 SF
TOWNHOMES:
SECOND FLOOR
APARTMENTS:
SECOND - FOURTH FLOOR ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, Inc.C B AD
4
3
2
1 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEPRINT NAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA120FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA18-017.002018-05-09AuthorCheckerLYNDALE GARDENSApproverDesigner2018-05-09 1/16" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2
FLOOR PLANS
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVELFOUR134' - 0"CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH REVEAL AT WINDOW HEADSWOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
BRICK
2 SOLDIER COURSE
BRICK
LED LIGHT FIXTURES
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"10' - 4"4' - 0"WOOD-LIKE
NICHIHA SIDING
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA
SIDING48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
BRICK
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
2 SOLDIER COURSES
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAPLAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH
VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"BRICK
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
C-CHANNEL
STOREFRONT
STOREFRONT AT EXTERIOR UNIT ENTRIES C-CHANNEL AT HEADER LIGHT FIXTURES AT EXTERIOR UNIT ENTRIES48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVELFOUR134' - 0"CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
PTAC FRAMED OUTSIDE WINDOW4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4" BRICK
2 SOLDIER COURSES
LED LIGHT FIXTURE LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
STOREFRONT
C-CHANNEL
CORRUGATED
METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT THE
WINDOW HEADS48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH
VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
BRICK
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
2 SOLDIER COURSES
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
48' - 4"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA 6 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE
5
4
3
2
1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRICHFIELD, MINNESOTA18-017.002018-04-20AuthorCheckerLYNDALE GARDENSApprover2018-04-20Designer 1/8" = 1'-0"4NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONSLEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING
WITH REVEAL AT WINDOW HEADS
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
BRICK
2 SOLDIER COURSE
BRICK
LED LIGHT FIXTURES
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL
WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"10' - 4"4' - 0"WOOD-LIKE
NICHIHA SIDING
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA
SIDING48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
BRICK
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
2 SOLDIER COURSES
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAPLAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH
VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"BRICK
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
C-CHANNEL
STOREFRONT
STOREFRONT AT EXTERIOR UNIT ENTRIES C-CHANNEL AT HEADER LIGHT FIXTURES AT EXTERIOR UNIT ENTRIES48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
PTAC FRAMED OUTSIDE WINDOW4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4" BRICK
2 SOLDIER COURSES
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL
WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
STOREFRONT
C-CHANNEL
CORRUGATED
METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT THE
WINDOW HEADS48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH
VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
BRICK
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
2 SOLDIER COURSES
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
48' - 4"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA
6
333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE
5
4
3
2
1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRICHFIELD, MINNESOTA18-017.002018-04-20AuthorCheckerLYNDALE GARDENSApprover2018-04-20Designer 1/8" = 1'-0"4NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING
WITH REVEAL AT WINDOW HEADS
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
BRICK
2 SOLDIER COURSE
BRICK
LED LIGHT FIXTURES
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL
WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"10' - 4"4' - 0"WOOD-LIKE
NICHIHA SIDING
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA
SIDING48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
BRICK
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
2 SOLDIER COURSES
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAPLAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH
VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"BRICK
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
C-CHANNEL
STOREFRONT
STOREFRONT AT EXTERIOR UNIT ENTRIES C-CHANNEL AT HEADER LIGHT FIXTURES AT EXTERIOR UNIT ENTRIES48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
PTAC FRAMED OUTSIDE WINDOW4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4" BRICK
2 SOLDIER COURSES
LED LIGHT FIXTURE
LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL
WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
STOREFRONT
C-CHANNEL
CORRUGATED
METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT THE
WINDOW HEADS48' - 4"LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
APARTMENT LEVEL
THREE
122' - 8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
144' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL TWO
111' - 4"
APARTMENT LEVEL
FOUR
134' - 0"4' - 0"10' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"11' - 4"LAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS WITH
VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
BRICK
CORRUGATED METAL SIDING WITH
REVEALS AT WINDOW HEADS
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
2 SOLDIER COURSES
FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING
48' - 4"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA
6
333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE
5
4
3
2
1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRICHFIELD, MINNESOTA18-017.002018-04-20AuthorCheckerLYNDALE GARDENSApprover2018-04-20Designer 1/8" = 1'-0"4 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
111' - 1 7/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
120' - 3"4' - 0 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"11' - 1 7/8"24' - 3 3/4"CORRUGATED METAL SIDING
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAPFIBERGLASS WINDOWS
PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
111' - 1 7/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
120' - 3"4' - 0 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"11' - 1 7/8"24' - 3 3/4"CORRUGATED METAL SIDING
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAPLAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANELS
WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
111' - 1 7/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
120' - 3"11' - 1 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"4' - 0 3/4"24' - 3 3/4"CORRUGATED METAL SIDING
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA SIDING
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP
LEVEL 1
100' - 0"
LEVEL 2
111' - 1 7/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
120' - 3"4' - 0 3/4"9' - 1 1/8"11' - 1 7/8"24' - 3 3/4"CORRUGATED METAL SIDING
FIBERGLASS WINDOWS
WOOD-LIKE NICHIHA
PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAPLAPPED FIBER CEMENT PANEL
WITH VERTICAL METAL REVEALS
BRICK ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA 6 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE
5
4
3
2
1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA201TOWNHOME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRICHFIELD, MINNESOTA18-017.002018-04-20AuthorCheckerLYNDALE GARDENSApprover2018-04-20Designer 1/8" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION - TOWNHOMES
1/8" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION - TOWNHOMES
1/8" = 1'-0"4 NORTH ELEVATION - TOWNHOMES
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION - TOWNHOMES
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
RENDERINGS
OVERALL BUILDING - VIEW LOOKING TOWARDS THE SOUTHWEST
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
RENDERINGS
OVERALL BUILDING - VIEW LOOKING TOWARDS THE NORTHWEST
18-017.00
LYNDALE GARDENS
APARTMENTS
Richfield, MN
May 14, 2018
RENDERINGSTOWNHOME FRONT ENTRIES
Summary
Please find attached our submission documents for the redevelopment of the former Lyndale
Garden Center property, the property currently containing the addresses 6330-6346 Lyndale
Ave South and 6328 Aldrich Ave South (PID: 28-028-24 11 0012). The legal description for the
properties noted above and in the Lyndale Gardens addition are Lot 1 Blk 1 (PID: 28-028-24 11
089), Lot 2 Blk 1 (28-028-24 11 0090), and Outlot C (28-028-24 14 0371).
The development will involve a new plat for the properties which is included in the attached
documents. The parcels will be identified by the proposed use of the property and also by lots
and blocks. The for-sale/condo parcel (Lot 1, Block 1), the apartment parcel (Lot 2, Block 1),
and the retail parcel (Lot 3, Block 1). For the proposed redevelopment, we are asking to rezone
the 6328 lot that we purchased in August in order for it to be added to the condo parcel. The
remainder of the properties are currently zoned as Planned Mixed Use (PMU).
Zoning. Existing = PMU, LDR (6328 Aldrich)
Proposed = PMU.
Gross Floor Area.
Existing = N/A
Proposed = Condos, 73,020;
Apartment, 53,222; Townhomes, 11,396;
Retail, 6,400
Parcel Size.
Existing divisions (Square Feet): Lot 1, Block 1 =
105,573
Lot 2, Block 1 = 66,647
Outlot C = 8,108
6328 Aldrich = 5,723
Proposed parcels:
Lot 1, Block 1 = 79,717
Lot 2, Block 1 = 58,514
Lot 3, Block 1 = 47,856
Building Envelope SF.
Existing = N/A
Proposed = Condos, 45,130 + below grade;
Apartment, 26,286; Townhomes, 15,651;
Retail, 6,616.
Total Parking spaces.
Grand total = 198
Condo = 73 total (42 underground, 13 surface, 8
detached garage)
Apartment/Townhome = 82 total (27 indoor, 55
surface)
Retail = 63
Number of Floors.
Existing = N/A
Proposed = Condos, 4 (3 above grade);
Apartment 4, ; Townhomes, 2;
Retail, 1.
Handicap parking.
Grand total = 10
Condo = 2 underground, 1 surface
Apartment/Townhome = 2 indoor, 2 surface
Retail = 3
Number of Employees.
Existing = N/A
Condos, Apartments = 2-4
Retail = TBD
Use of Property.
Existing = Vacant
Proposed = Multi-family residential @ 138,231 SF
Retail @ 47,856 SF
Multi-Family Projects, number of units.
Grand total = 104
Condos, 30; Apartments, 66; Townhomes, 8.
1
Ownership
The 6328 Aldrich property is owned by The Cornerstone Group, Inc. The remaining properties
listed above are owned by Lyndale Gardens LLC. Colleen Carey is owner and president of both
companies.
Proposed use
The proposed use of the condo parcel will be 30 for sale condominiums. The mix of units will
be: 8 - 1 bedroom (~1400SF), 16 - 2 bedroom (~1400SF) and 6 - 3 bedroom (~2500SF) units.
Current designs show 42 underground parking spaces, with an additional 13 surface spaces
and 8 in a proposed exterior parking structure. The total of 63 spaces would bring the project
to an average of just over 2 spaces per unit.
The apartment parcel will feature 66 rental apartments and 8 rental townhomes. Apartment mix
will be 57 studios (~450SF) and 9 - 1 bedroom (~700SF). Townhomes will include 6 - 3
bedroom units (~1470SF) and 2 - 2 bedroom units (~1260SF). Amenities will be shared
amongst all units and will consist of a large commons area with a patio, two fitness rooms and
a bike storage and repair station. Total parking is 82 spaces or 1.24 per unit.
The retail site proposal includes a single story commercial building directly north of Lakewinds
co-op and 63 parking spots. The approximately 6400 SF building would be divided into 2-4
retail/office spaces.
Schedule
The for-sale condo and the apartment projects have a projected construction start date of
Autumn 2018. It is estimated that the duration of the construction will be 10-12 months,
leading to a proposed completion date sometime in the summer of 2019.
The retail project construction will commence once a tenant or tenants have been identified. It
would be our goal to begin construction in the Spring or Summer of 2019. Depending on the
tenant and primary use of the space, construction would take between 9 and 18 months.
Easements
The site is subject to a number of easements, which are listed on the attached document,
Exhibit A.
Impact
Adjacent properties are:
-Northern boundary = Single and multi-family residential.
-Western boundary = City owned shoreline, Stormwater management ponds, Richfield Lake.
-Eastern boundary = Lyndale Avenue.
-Southern boundary = Lakewinds Natural Food Cooperative.
The below sections regarding the Comp plan amendment and the Richfield Lake shoreline each
speak to the positive effect we hope our project will have on our neighbors and adjacent
properties.
2
Overall, we feel like the project will bring much more life, light and vitality to an area that has
been vacant for a long time. In speaking to neighbors, they are hopeful that our project will
bring a sense of greater security to the area that has become a vacant space where loitering is
a reality and vandalism and littering are common.
Adding to this vitality is the vision for a space that has access and connectivity. It will bring a
higher level of pedestrian traffic to the whole area, benefitting all in terms of safety and social
health. This increased foot traffic should benefit the local businesses close to the development.
The apartment developer expects to improve the streetscape along Lyndale Avenue. The street
level of the apartment building includes active use common areas and residential units with
front entries, which provide access directly to the street and contribute to public safety. In
addition, there will be an outdoor patio, sidewalk lighting and attractive landscaping to enhance
the pedestrian experience along this section of Lyndale Avenue. Finally, the apartment
developer is proposing a new bus shelter just north of the current access point to the property
at 64th and Lyndale Avenue.
Each of the buildings is thoughtfully placed in a way that should minimize any shadowing effect
on the single family residential homes north of the proposed development areas. The height of
the tallest building will be the 4-story apartment building, which is one story less than The
Cornerstone Group’s previously approved site concept. Plus, the proposed apartment building
is now along Lyndale Avenue and will have little to no impact on the single family homes.
The site will continue to provide easy access to the Richfield Lake Amphitheater public space
as well as the walking paths around the lake. Please see Exhibit B for a site map that shows
access points to the site and adjacent properties.
Lakewinds co-op should gain more customers from having neighbors directly to the north of
their business as they already have from the scheduled music events at the Richfield Lake
Amphitheater.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Narrative
Due to the above proposed uses, we feel that our development will require a comp plan
amendment. The following demonstrate our arguments for the requested amendment.
The Cornerstone Group and Northbay Companies (collectively the developers) are requesting
an amendment to the current comprehensive plan density requirements. A Mixed Use District
in the Richfield area currently requires residential densities of 50+ units per acre. However, our
project (with a combination of apartments, townhomes and condominiums) is estimated to
have a density of about 33 units per acre. There are many reasons that our concepts and
designs do not reach the required density as well as some ideas that will be proposed to show
that the lower density in many ways, will be beneficial and more appropriate for the site and the
surrounding neighborhoods.
The mixed use development site in question is the former Lyndale Garden Center between the
eastern shore of Richfield Lake and Lyndale Ave S. This site is unique in many ways. Some of
the challenges that are limiting how we can use the site as well as the ability to maximize
density are as follows:
1.High water table. Many parts of the site, especially close to Richfield Lake, have a high
water table, which makes underground construction unfeasible and/or very costly.
3
2.Poor soils and debris. Debris and garbage from the Highway 62 construction project was
buried on the site in the 1960’s. Between depths of approximately 4 ft and 14ft, the
percentage of construction debris, contamination and garbage is extremely high. This
makes the construction on the site challenging and very expensive. As noted in point one,
underground construction, especially the parking required for higher density projects is not
feasible.
3.Lake Setback. Richfield Lake has a setback from the OHWL of 75ft. Due to the high
amount of shoreline, the setback decreases the buildable area of the site by more than
20%. Again, this works against the maximization of density.
4.Area rents. One of the reason that higher costs of construction and site work are not
feasible is due to the lack of high rent units available in the surrounding area to make a
direct comparison required from lenders and financial support agencies. Without these
comps, it is not possible to justify the higher rents that would be required to make up for
the higher construction costs.
Besides the above reasons that make higher density construction challenging, there are at
least two arguments to be made that a lower density project would be more appropriate for this
are of Richfield.
1.Transitional density. The City of Richfield is currently proposing some new language in the
Comp Plan that would allow lower densities at the edges of the mixed use districts.
Although this isn’t in place yet, the intent of the language and description of the effected
area (66th and Lyndale) match up perfectly with the Lyndale Gardens mixed use
development. The general idea is that between a high density area and a residential area,
there would be a transitional area where lower densities would be appropriate. The entire
northern boundary of the development site is bordered by a single family, residential
neighborhood where such a transition would be beneficial to the existing homeowners.
2.Lake classification. A final consideration, is the current development classification of
Richfield Lake. The DNR currently has the lake classified as “Recreational Development”.
This classification lists the appropriate density around this type of lake to be between 3 and
25 dwellings per mile of shoreline.
Richfield Lake Shoreline
One feature of the condo parcel is that it borders shoreline property owned by the City of
Richfield. We feel that it is to our advantage to proactively think about how we may partner with
the city to improve the shoreline.
To date, we have performed the following activities that have contributed to an improved
natural environment and lakeshore.
-Environmental clean up work ongoing. To date, 18,000+ tons of contaminated soils have been
removed from the housing development site including 235 tons of asbestos removed from an
area near the lakeshore.
-Less impervious surface. Previously, about 80% of site was paved. Post development, 50
percent or more of the site will be green space.
Our plans for the site would include the following goals that will improve the natural
environment further. All plans for parts of the shoreline that are owned by city would have to be
approved and completed in a collaborative manner.
4
-Erosion control measures and management of run-off waters will mean less debris, sediment,
trash ending up in the water.
-Clean up and removal of trash and debris from the former garden center.
-Cooperative restoration of shoreline and a reintroduction of native plants in harmony with
current efforts and strategies employed by the City and the DNR.
-Removal of invasive and diseased plants and the preservation of existing trees wherever
possible.
-Protection of habitats for birds and the introduction of new bird habitats.
Pedestrian Access
For reference, please see Exhibit B for a map of access points to and from the property.
A goal of the redevelopment of the former Lyndale Gardens Center involved public use and
pedestrian access. The Cornerstone Group has already installed a bridge that connects the
Lakewinds Co-op and the Richfield Lake Amphitheater with existing walking paths in order to
provide a direct connection to the southern portion of the site.
Our plans will show intentional connections to both Lyndale Ave and the neighborhood to the
North of the property. In order to connect the Amphitheater and Richfield Lake walking paths to
Lyndale Avenue, a sidewalk will be installed for direct pedestrian access. The site will also have
sidewalk connections to both Aldrich Ave S and Bryant Ave S. The Bryant Ave connection will
act as the northern connection point to the Richfield Lake walking paths, creating a full loop on
the site.
Document submitted by:
Lawrence Black, Project Manager - The Cornerstone Group. 612-991-8372
Colleen Carey, President - The Cornerstone Group. 952-484-6857
5
EXHIBIT A
List of easements
1. Doc. Nos. 2928405 and 2917948. Utility and drainage easements. City of Richfield.
2. Document No. T4423473. Utility and drainage easements. City of Richfield, filed
September 6, 2007.
3. Document No. T5109577. Easement for drainage, utilities and driveway access.
Lakewinds Natural Foods Cooperative, filed August 23, 2013.
4. Document No. T5109576. Easement for party wall of Coop. Lakewinds Natural Foods
Cooperative, filed April 23, 2013.
5. Document No. T5163361. Declaration for maintenance of Outlots B and C. City of
Richfield, filed April 7, 2014.
6. Document No. T5377266. Conditional Use Permit for Outlot B. City of Richfield, filed
September 2, 2016.
7. Document No. T5382874. Easement regarding access to and parking for Outlot B.
Lyndale Gardens LLC. September 19, 2016.
6
EXHIBIT B
Pedestrian Access Map
7
EXHIBIT B
PEDESTRIAN
BIKE
KEY
R
R
MR-3
MR-3
PMU
PMU
PMR
PMU
C-2
R
R
C-2
R
R
R R
C-2
C-2
R
MR-3
R R
R R R
R
R
R
RR
R R
C-2
R R RR
R
R
C-2
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
PMU
R
R
R
R
C-2
R
R
RR
R R
R R
R
R
RR
RRR
R
PMU
C-2
C-2
RR
R
R
R
C-2
MR-2
R
R R
R
RR
R
R
R
R
RR
MR-3
C-2
C-2
MR-1
MR-2MR-2MR-2
PMU
R
R
PMR
C-2
MR-1
PMR
RRR
C-2C-2
R
R
PC-2
MR-2
±
LYNDALE GARDENS - CP RZN PUD 6/2018Zoning Designations
0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet
Zoning:PMU - Planned Mixed UseC-2 - General CommercialMR-3 - High Density ResidentialR - Single Family Residential 500 ftI:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\Lyndale Gardens - Z.mxd
64TH STREETLYNDALE AVEALDRICH AVE65TH STREET63RD STREET
500 ft. notification area
Lyndale Gardens Site BRYANT AVE6328 Aldrich Ave - property to be rezoned
PRK
MHD
MIXED
MIXED
MIXED
MIXED
MIXED
CC
MIXED
MHD
CC
MIXED
CC CC
MIXED
MHD
MIXED
LDR
MIXED
LDR
LDR
MIXED
HDR
LDR LDR
LDR
LDR LDRLDR
LDR LDR LDR
LDR
LDR
LDRLDR
LDR
CC
LDRCC
LDR LDR LDRLDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
MHDMHDMHD
MIXED
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDRLDR
LDR LDR
LDR LDR
MIXED
LDR
LDR
LDRLDR
LDRLDR
CC
MIXED
LDR
LDR
LDR
MIXED
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
MIXED
LDR LDR
LDR
LDRLDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
MIXED
LDRLDR
MIXED
MIXED
MIXED
LDRLDRLDR
MIXEDMIXED
LDR
LDR
MIXED
LDRLDRLDR
LDR
HDR
±
LYNDALE GARDENS - CP RZN PUD 6/2018Comprehensive Plan Designations
0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet
Comprehensive Plan:MIXED - Mixed UseCC - Community CommercialMHD - Medium-High Density ResidentialLDR - Low Density Residential 500 ftI:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\Lyndale Gardens - CP.mxd
64TH STREETLYNDALE AVEALDRICH AVE65TH STREET63RD STREET
500 ft. notification area
Lyndale Gardens Site BRYANT AVE6328 Aldrich Ave - property to be re-guided
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.H.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 100
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation S ervices D irector
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jim Topitzhofer, Recreation S ervices D irector
6/5/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the approval of the lease agreement between the City of Richfield and E T S Elite
South Central, L LC for use of the space formerly occupied by Hat Trick Hockey to conduct physical
training programs.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
The Richfield I ce Arena has become the home of Minnesota’s newest Tier 2 J unior Hockey Team, the
Minnesota Magicians. To accommodate the team, the City has constructed an additional locker room to Rink
1 and the Magicians have been renting this space. To further accommodate the team, the 1,900 square-foot
area of the Arena that was formerly occupied by Hat Trick Hockey was converted into a training facility for
ice sport athletes and leased to the team on October 15, 2014. On April 15, 2017, the space was subleased to
Surge Sports Training LLC, a private company that conducts sports training services to the Minnesota
Magicians and other users of the Richfield Arena. That lease expired on April 14, 2018. An experienced
training company, E TS Elite South Central, L L C, has stepped forward and will resume use of the space for
the same purpose.
Highlights of the Lease Agreement are as follows:
Rent - $1,350 per month for the first 12 months of lease term, $1,425 per month for the next 12 months
of the lease term and $1,500 per month for the remaining 12 months of the lease period.
Term - The term of the Lease Agreement shall commence on September 1, 2018, and shall terminate
on August 31, 2021.
Use of Leased Premises - The Leased Premises shall be used only for training purposes for
individuals and groups including strength conditioning, aerobic conditioning, skill development and other
ice sports training activities, and other activities as the City may authorize from time to time.
Taxes - Hennepin County officials have reviewed the attached lease and have determined use of the
leased premises are not subject to property taxes because the leased premises will not operate as a
training center for the general public such as a private health club.
Utilities - The Team will pay a prorated share of electric and gas utilities for the lease space.
Insurance – E TS Elite South Central will be required to carry general liability insurance as set forth in
Article V.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the lease agreement between the City of Richfield and the E T S Elite South
Central, LL C for use of the space formerly occupied by Hat Trick Hockey to conduct physical training
programs.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
At a study session on April 18, 2013, staff presented a proposal to construct a number of building
improvements at the I ce Arena including the construction of a dedicated locker room, training
area, lobby expansion and exhibit area/classrooms to accommodate the new team and larger
crowds. Cost estimates for all these improvements were initially estimated at about $1,961,960 not
including parking lot expansion and related storm water retention that would be triggered by
building code due to the magnitude of the amount of improvements made to the Arena. W hen
adding the cost of parking lot and storm water retention improvements, it was later concluded that
the cost to fund these improvements over a fifteen-year bond term would far exceed the amount of
anticipated additional revenue the new improvements would help generate to pay the annual bond
payments. As a result, the proposal to proceed with lobby, classroom and training facility
expansion was abandoned.
City Council approved a contract with Derau Construction Company on November 12, 2013 in the
amount of $510,900 to construct an attached locker room to Rink 1 as a stand-alone project. This
contract did not include architectural design costs or contingency.
The estimated final cost of the new locker room is $625,478 including design cost and
contingency.
The Minnesota Magicians played their first home game on September 19, 2013. An ordinance
amendment was approved by Council on August 28, 2013 to temporarily allow a properly licensed
food establishment to sell 3.2 percent malt liquor beverages at the Richfield Arena for the
remainder of the Magician’s first season.
State Representative Linda Slocum and Senator Melissa W icklund sponsored and introduced a
bill for special legislation to sell strong beer and wine at the Richfield Arena. The Minnesota State
Legislature enacted this bill earlier this year.
The Richfield City Council approved a rental agreement between the City and the Magicians on
September 9, 2014, for use of the newly constructed locker room.
The lease with Hat Trick Hockey was terminated on March 31, 2014 by default. The 1,900 square-
foot area of the Arena that was formerly occupied by Hat Trick Hockey was converted into a
training facility for ice sport athletes and leased to the team on October 15, 2014. On April 15,
2017, the space was subleased to Surge Sports Training LLC, a private company that conducts
sports training services to the Minnesota Magicians and other users of the Richfield Arena. That
lease expired on April 14, 2018.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City Council considers and executes these types of agreements for the City.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Minor modifications to the space (at the lessors cost) are needed before the space is used on
September 1, 2018.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
E TS Elite South Central, L L C is required to provide it's own equipment.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
City Council may reject the agreement and renegotiate with E TS Elite South Center, LLC.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Kris Weiby, Facilities Manager
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
A rena Traning F acility L ease C over Memo
AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR
AGENDA ITEM #5.I.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 101
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jared Voto, E xecutive A ide/A nalyst
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the adoption of a resolution appointing W hitney Bain and Kristen Lindquist to the
Board of Directors of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
On J une 25, 1990, the City Council approved an ordinance to levy a 3% tax on gross receipts of lodging from
Richfield Hotels and Motels pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. The establishment of the Richfield Tourism
Promotion Board, I nc. (RTP B) and the appointment of directors was also a part of the resolution. Currently,
there are five director positions on the RTP B. The term of each appointment is for three years.
The current appointments to the RTP B and the ending dates of their terms are as follows:
1. Gordon Vizecky, representing the Richfield Chamber of Commerce, term ending on December 31,
2019.
2. Raj Bhakta, General Manager of Baymont Suites, term ending December 31, 2018.
3. Adam Selby, General Manager of Four Points by Sheraton, term ending December 31, 2018.
4. Brian Kuffel, Director of Sales of Candlewood Suites, term ending December 31, 2018.
5. Vacant, representative of Motel 6.
Brian Kuffel no longer works at Candlewood Suites, leaving the Board position vacant. W hitney Bain,
General Manager of Candlewood Suites has asked to be appointed to the Board. Ms. Bain has been
General Manager for Candlewood Suites for seven years and transferred in December from
Denver, Colorado to be the General Manager of the Candlewood Suites in Richfield. She studied
Natural Resource Recreation and Tourism during college and in the past she interned with Disney
World resorts with their college program in Lake Buena Vista.
Adam Selby no longer works at Four Points by Sheraton, leaving the Board position vacant. Kristen
Lindquist, General Manager of the Four Points by Sheraton has asked to be appointed to the Board. Ms.
Lindquist began her career in hospitality 14 years ago, as a front desk agent, working her way through the
rants of the front office and night audit; later to become Assistant Controller and now in her current position as
General Manager. She has had the pleasure of working for companies such as Wyndham, Starwood Legacy,
and Marriott.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Adopt a resolution appointing W hitney Bain and Krisen Lindquist to the Board of Directors
of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
This information is contained in the Executive Summary.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City Council has the authority to make appointments to the RTP B.
The RTP B Board includes a representative from each of the hotel properties and a member of the
Richfield Chamber of Commerce.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
Two Board positions are currently vacant, so the RTP B Board does not have a quorum and is
unable to conduct their regular business.These Board positions should be filled immediately in
order to continue the operations of the RTP B.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
There is no cost to the City.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The appointments conform to City ordinance and bylaws of the RTP B.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
The City Council could decide not to make this appointment to the RTP B and direct staff how to
proceed.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
None
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RICHFIELD TOURISM
PROMOTION BOARD, INC.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has levied a 3% tax on the gross receipts of lodging
from hotels and motels in the City pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 169.190; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Section 169.190 authorizes the proceeds of the tax
to fund a Tourism Promotion Board for the purpose of marketing and promoting the City as
a tourist or convention center; and
WHEREAS, the articles and bylaws of the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board, Inc.
provide the City Council of the City of Richfield appoint five (5) directors to the Board
representing the Richfield hotel-motel properties and the Richfield Chamber of Commerce;
and
WHEREAS, each director shall serve as a director until his or her successor has
been appointed and has qualified, or until his or her earlier disqualification, death,
resignation, or removal; and
WHEREAS, the term of the following hotel representatives are vacant and new
representatives have indicated a desire to be appointed to the Richfield Tourism Promotion
Board:
• Whitney Bain, General Manager of Candlewood Suites
• Kristen Lindquist, General Manager of Four Points by Sheraton
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, that the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board directors be modified as follows:
Appoint the following hotel representatives to the Richfield Tourism Promotion Board
to complete a three-year term:
• Whitney Bain, General Manager of Candlewood Suites, term ending December
31, 2018.
• Kristen Lindquist, General Manager of Four Points by Sheraton, term ending
December 31, 2018.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 12th day of
June, 2018.
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM #7.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 102
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regis, F inance Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/5/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/5/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Public hearing and consideration of the adoption of a resolution providing host approval for the
issuance of tax-exempt revenue bonds by the City of Bethel for the benefit of Partnership Academy.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Partnership Academy is currently a K-5 charter school that first opened its doors is 2002. The school began
with a student body of around 100, predominantly African-American students from South Minneapolis and
Richfield. The student body has grown to its current size of approximately 300 students and shifted to be over
ninety-percent Latino, drawing from Richfield, Bloomington, and South Minneapolis.
The purpose of the issuance of the tax-exempt revenue bonds is to finance the acquisition of approximately
1.79 acres of land located at 6500 South Nicollet Avenue, the demolition of existing buildings, and the
construction and equipping of an approximately 40,022 square foot facility for use as a public charter school
that will allow for the expansion of their program to a pre-kindergarten through eighth grade program.
Partnership Academy originally approached the City of Richfield for the issuance of the tax-exempt revenue
bonds; however, the City of Richfield did not have the capacity to issue bank-qualified bonds for Partnership
Academy this year.
Subsequently, the City of Bethel agreed to issue the tax-exempt revenue bonds on behalf of Partnership
Academy. Because the project to be financed is located in the City of Richfield, prior to issuance of the tax-
exempt revenue bonds by the City of Bethel, the City of Richfield must hold a public hearing and provide host
approval in order to satisfy state law and tax law requirements.
Finally, the bonds will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City Richfield and will not be secured
by the full faith and credit or taxing powers of the City of Richfield. I n the event the Partnership Academy
encounters financial difficulties, no assets or revenues of the City of Richfield will be available to pay the
principal of or interest on the tax-exempt revenue bonds.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
Conduct and close the public hearing and by motion: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City of Bethel
to issue tax-exempt revenue bonds on behalf of Partnership Academy.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Because the project to be financed is located in the City of Richfield, prior to the issuance of the
tax-exempt revenue bonds by the City of Bethel, the City of Richfield must hold a public hearing
and provide host approval in order to satisfy state law and tax law requirements.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The City of Richfield was asked to issue the tax-exempt revenue bonds for the benefit of
Partnership Academy but did not have the capacity to issue bank-qualified bonds for Partnership
Academy this year.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
N/A
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
I f host approval is granted, the tax-exempt revenue bonds will be issued as revenue obligations of
the City of Bethel. The tax-exempt revenue bonds will not be an obligation of the City of Richfield.
The principal of and interest on the tax-exempt revenue bonds will be payable solely from revenues
derived from Partnership Academy. The tax-exempt revenue bonds will not constitute a general or
moral obligation of the City of Richfield and will not be secured by the full faith and credit or taxing
powers of the City of Richfield. I n the event the Project encounters financial difficulties, no assets
or revenues of the City of Richfield will be available to pay the principal of or interest on the tax-
exempt revenue bonds.
Providing host approval does not affect the City’s bond rating or its ability to issue up to
$10,000,000 in bank-qualified obligations in calendar year 2018.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
A notice of public hearing was published in the May 24, 2018, Sun Current.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
The City could decide not to provide host approval.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Gina Fiorini, Kenney & Graven; Representatives from Partnership Academy
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Resolution Resolution L etter
525247v1 JAE BE250-16
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO AND APPROVING THE
ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF BETHEL OF ITS CONDUIT
REVENUE OBLIGATIONS AND TAKING OTHER ACTIONS
WITH RESPECT THERETO
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the “City”) is a home rule charter city and political
subdivision duly organized and existing under its Charter and the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended
(the “Act”), the City is authorized to carry out the public purposes described in the Act by providing for
the issuance of revenue bonds to provide funds to finance revenue producing enterprises, whether or not
operated for profit; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.656, as amended, authorizes a municipality to issue
obligations to finance the acquisition or improvement of property located outside of the corporate
boundaries of such municipality if the governing body of the city in which the property is located
consents by resolution to the issuance of such obligations; and
WHEREAS, Partnership Academy Association, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
“Company”), has requested that the City of Bethel, Minnesota (the “City of Bethel”) issue its revenue
bonds, in one or more series, as taxable or tax-exempt obligations (the “Bonds”), in a principal amount
not to exceed $15,000,000, and loan the proceeds thereof to the Company for the purposes of (i) financing
the acquisition of approximately 1.79 acres of land located at 6500 South Nicollet Avenue in the City, the
demolition of existing buildings thereon, and the construction and equipping of an approximately 40,022
square foot facility thereon (the “Project”) for use as a public charter school for students in
pre-kindergarten through eighth grade; (ii) financing capitalized interest during the construction of the
Project, if necessary; (iii) funding any required reserves; and (iv) paying costs of issuance of the Bonds;
and
WHEREAS, the Project will be owned by the Company and leased to and operated by
Partnership Academy, Inc., a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and public charter school (the “School”),
pursuant to a lease agreement; and
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and
regulations promulgated thereunder require that prior to the issuance of the Bonds, the City Council of the
City (the “City Council”) consent to the issuance of the Bonds by the City of Bethel after conducting a
public hearing thereon preceded by publication of a notice of public hearing (in the form required by
Section 147(f) of the Code and applicable regulations) in a newspaper of general circulation within the
City at least fourteen (14) days prior to the public hearing date; and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing (the “Public Notice”) was published at least fourteen (14)
days before the regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council on the date hereof in the Sun Current, the
official newspaper of and a newspaper of general circulation in the City, with respect to the required
public hearing under Section 147(f) of the Code; and
525247v1 JAE BE250-16 2
WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the City Council conducted a public hearing at which a
reasonable opportunity was provided for interested individuals to express their views, both orally and in
writing, on the following: (i) consent to the issuance of the Bonds by the City of Bethel pursuant to the
requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder; and (ii) approval
of the issuance of the Bonds by the City of Bethel to finance the Project; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to approve the issuance of
the Bonds by the City of Bethel to finance the Project and hereby consents to the issuance of the Bonds
by the City of Bethel for the purposes set forth above in an amount not to exceed $15,000,000.
2. The Bonds are to be issued by the City of Bethel pursuant to the Act. The Bonds will
constitute special, limited obligations of the City of Bethel secured solely by revenues derived from the
operation of the Project and other security provided by the Company and the School, including but not
limited to a mortgage on the land and buildings comprising the Project. The Bonds will not constitute a
general or moral obligation of the City or the City of Bethel and will not be secured by any taxing powers of
the City or the City of Bethel.
3. The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver
any documents deemed necessary to fulfill the intentions of this resolution.
4. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers, employees, and agents of the City are
hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the original purchaser of the
Bonds certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the approval of the issuance
of the Bonds, including a certification of this resolution.
5. The Company will, upon demand, reimburse the City for costs paid or incurred by the
City in connection with this resolution.
6. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of June, 2018.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED
ORDINANCES
AGENDA ITEM #8.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 103
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Matt B rillhart, A ssociate P lanner
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: John S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D irector
6/6/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the first reading of an ordinance rezoning property at 101 66th Street East (66th
Street and 1st Avenue) from Single-family residential to Planned Mixed Use.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
P L H & Associates (Developer) has submitted an application for a planned unit development that
includes a 3-story mixed-use building with 31 residential units and approximately 6,000 square feet
of commercial space. Along with the application for a planned unit development, the Developer
applied to amend the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of the property to Mixed
Use. On May 22, the City Council voted (5-0) to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation of the
property. T he Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the proposed development on
April 23 and heard additional public testimony on May 29. Several residents testified at the Planning
Commission meetings and submitted email comments in opposition to the change in zoning and the
proposed development. T he Planning Commission voted (7-0) to recommend approval of rezoning
the property and the final development plans, with additional stipulations related to landscaping and
parking lot screening along the south and east edges of the property.
T his first reading of rezoning is an administrative requirement and does not obligate the Council to
approve the ordinance upon second reading; nor does it obligate the Council to approve the specific
development plans.T he second reading and final development plans will be considered by the
Council on June 26, 2018.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve a first reading of an ordinance that ame nds Richfield Zoning Code
Appendix I to designate 101 66th Stre et East as Planne d Mix ed Use .
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Southview Baptist Church vacated the property and began marketing it for sale in 2013.
T he Developer purchased the property in 2016.
Joint Council/Planning Commission work sessions were held on August 23, 2016, and
November 20, 2017.
An incomplete land use application was submitted in December 2017, but was put on hold
at the Developer's request before the administrative review process had begun.
Plans were re-submitted in March 2018 and staff determined that the application was
complete on April 9, 2018.
T he Developer held open house meetings to discuss the proposal with the neighborhood
on April 19 and May 14.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District Designations
The Comprehensive Plan is an expression of the community's vision for the future. Over the past 18
months, the City has been engaging the community to update the Comprehensive Plan. As part of this
update, a small area plan for the 66th Street and Nicollet Avenue area was prepared. Given its proximity
to the intersection and the fact that it had been vacant for many years, the property at 101 66th Street
East was included in the small area study. A market study identifying the types of uses that the area
could support was prepared as part of this work. That study indicated that larger format retail, prominent
in the Hub Shopping Center, was unlikely to regain prominence due to the migration of this type of retail
to freeway corridors. The study also confirmed the strength of the Richfield housing market, indicating
that there was an opportunity to build additional higher income multi-family housing in this area. A small
amount of office space was also indicated as a possibility for the area, specifically as a complement to
new residential buildings in a mixed-use development pattern. Based on the market study and the input of
the community, the Comprehensive Plan update designates the site as Mixed Use.
Along with the applications for rezoning and a planned unit development, the Developer applied
to amend the Comprehensive Plan designation of the property to Mixed Use. T his application
for a change to a single parcel can be approved more quickly by the Metropolitan Council than
the entire Comprehensive Plan update. On May 22, 2018, the City Council voted (5-0) to
approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Now that the Comprehensive Plan designation
has been changed to Mixed Use, the property can be rezoned accordingly. T his first reading is
an administrative requirement and does not obligate the Council to approve the ordinance upon
second reading.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
60-DAY R U LE: T he 60-day clock started when a complete application was received on
April 9, 2018. T he deadline for a decision was extended by an additional 60 days (120
days total). T he Council must make a decision by August 7, 2018.
A second reading of the proposed ordinance is scheduled for J une 26, 2018, alongside
consideration of other required land use applications.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The required application fees have been paid.
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on April 23. Notice of the public
hearing was mailed to properties within 350 feet of the proposed development and published in the
Sun Current newspaper. A second postcard providing an updated timeline of Planning
Commission and City Council meetings was mailed on May 8.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed rezoning (7-0).
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Reject the proposed ordinance.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Paul Lynch, P L H & Associates
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Ordinance - Rezoning Ordinance
D eveloper narrative B ackup Material
P lanting plan & building visualizations B ackup Material
S ite plans B ackup Material
A erial photos & Zoning Map B ackup Material
C orrespondence/comments received E xhibit
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING;
AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD
CITY CODE BY REZONING
LOTS 7 AND 8 EXCEPT THE SOUTH 50 FEET
OF THE WEST HALF OF LOT 8,
GOODSPEED’S FIRST PLAT
AS PLANNED MIXED USE (PMU)
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 8, of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code is amended by
adding new Paragraph (7) as follows:
(13) M-8 (1st Avenue to Stevens Avenue, South of 66th). Lots 7 and
8 except the south 50 feet of the west half of Lot 8, Goodspeed’s First
Plat
Sec. 2. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the
Richfield City Charter.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of June,
2018.
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
7900 International Drive + Suite 550 + Minneapolis, MN 55425
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING
March 22, 2018
Matt Brillhart
Associate Planner
Community Development Department
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
RE: Project Description and Application Narrative for Planning Consideration
PLH Mixed-Use Development
Richfield, Minnesota
Matt,
Please consider the following project description and narrative during the review process for the attached Planning &
Zoning Application which includes the following types of requests.
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment
• Planned Unit Development (PUD)
All supplemental information required by the application for each of these requests has also been included to provide
a comprehensive review.
The subject project area is located near the corner of 1st Avenue South and 66th Street in Richfield, Minnesota (PID
No.: 2702824420134), and totals approximately 1.06 acres. Note that the subject project area was divided into four
parcels (PID Nos.: 2702824420071, 2702824420069, 2702824420070, and 2702824420073), prior to recently being
combined administratively through Hennepin County.
PLH is proposing construction of a new approximate 52,705 square foot mixed-use building and parking areas, which
provide 71 stalls between the above ground and lower level parking areas. Additionally, associated site improvements
including drive isles, stormwater facilities, landscaping, and utilities are also proposed as part of the development. A
preliminary breakdown of the building layout is provided below.
• Lower Level: Underground parking (approximately 33 spaces)
• First Floor: 6,122 SF of commercial tenant space + 5 residential units with community and fitness rooms
• Second Floor: 13 Residential Units
• Third Floor: 13 Residential Units
Per the Richfield Zoning Map, the parcel is currently zoned R1 – Low-Density Single-Family Residential. As part of the
PUD, and to accommodate development of the proposed new mixed-use development, we are requesting to rezone
the parcels to PMU – Planned Mixed-Use. We are also requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the
designation of these parcels from Low Density Residential and Public/Quasi-Public to Mixed-Use. In addition to rezoning
the parcels as part the PUD, we are also requesting reduced parking requirements, a reduced buffer area along the
south property line, and a zero foot setback along 66th Street as indicated on the attached site plans.
The requested PUD combines several unique characteristics of the proposed land use and site to provide a development
that is designed in a manner which forms a desirable and unified environment, while meeting the intent of the City’s
future proposed 2018 Comprehensive Plan by providing a well-designed development that complements the existing
and surrounding neighborhood character.
The development as proposed is in conformance with the purpose and intent of the guiding district, which allows for
both residential and non-residential land uses to be included in a single PUD district, to provide a balanced mix of
higher density residential, commercial, and retail service uses.
Page 2 of 2
952.426.0699 + www.is-grp.com
As designed, the development promotes efficient use of the land and surrounding resources, including public and utility
services. Furthermore, due to the intended use and consistent mix of both residential and retail / commercial traffic
flow expected, no traffic impacts to the transportation network, subject property, or neighboring properties, nor
excessive burdens to other public facilities are anticipated.
These considerations along with the supplemental information provided within this submittal support approval of the
requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development. Please contact me at 952.426.0699 if
there is any additional information we can provide in support of this request on behalf of PLH & Associates.
Sincerely,
Ryan Anderson
Designer
Civil Engineering Group
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PLH MIXED USE BUILDING
NORTHEAST
09/27/17
ISG Project No. 17-20746
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PLH MIXED USE BUILDING
NORTHWEST
09/27/17
ISG Project No. 17-20746
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PLH MIXED USE BUILDING
SOUTHEAST
09/27/17
ISG Project No. 17-20746
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PLH MIXED USE BUILDING
SOUTHWEST
09/27/17
ISG Project No. 17-20746
EXTERIOR CONCEPTUAL RENDERING
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com PLH MIXED USE
Richfield, Minnesota
April 16, 2018
ISG Project No. 17-20746
17-20746C0-10ARTARTATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C0 - DETAILSREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE DATAPLH MIXED USEBUILDING5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALARTNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. NSWELOCATION MAP0SCALE IN FEET500'1000'SITE SUMMARYPROPOSED ZONING:PMU, PLANNED MIXED USESITE AREA:0.98 AC.IMPERVIOUS AREAPROPOSED:0.72 AC. / 73%GREENSPACEPROPOSED:0.26 AC. / 27%BUILDING COVERAGEPROPOSED:0.30 AC. / 31%RETAIL SF:6,122 SFRESIDENTIAL SF:33,250 SFUNDERGROUND SF:13,333 SFBUILDING SF:52,705 SFRESIDENTIAL UNITS:31 UNITSPARKING REQUIREMENTS (PER CITY CODE)TYPEUNIT / AREASTALLS REQUIREDSTALLS PROVIDED19' x 9'1.5 / UNIT473319' X 9'3.5 / 1000 SF2238HANDICAP STALL22TOTAL:6971SETBACKSPARKINGBUILDINGFRONT YARD3'0'SIDE YARD3'0'REAR YARD3'0'RESIDENTIAL3'15' LEGEND EXISTINGCITY LIMITSACCESS CONTROLSECTION LINEQUARTER SECTION LINERIGHT OF WAY LINEPROPERTY / LOTLINEEASEMENT LINECULVERTWATER EDGEWETLAND BOUNDARYWETLAND / MARSHWATERFENCE LINESTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERSANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINCONTOUR (MAJOR)UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEOVERHEAD ELECTRICUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TVGASUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICCONTOUR (MINOR)DECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREETREE LINEMANHOLE/STRUCTURECATCH BASINHYDRANTCURB STOPVALVEUTILITY PEDESTAL / CABINETPOWER POLE990989PROPOSEDCULVERTSTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TVGASCONTOURSTORM MANHOLECATCH BASINHYDRANTVALVEEASEMENTRIGHT OF WAYSTORM SEWER (PIPE WIDTH)1015LOT LINEOVERHEAD UTILITYUNDERGROUND UTILITY CITY OFRICHFIELD, MNPROJECT LOCATIONMN 121
PROJECT ADDRESS / LOCATION:6600 STEVENS AVENUE SOUTHRICHFIELD, MN 55423S27, T28, R24RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN, MINNESOTASANITARY CLEAN OUTCURB STOPPORTLAND AVENUE
SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCEALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF RICHFIELD REQUIREMENTS ANDMNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2016 EDITION, AND THESTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN ASPROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 2013, UNLESS DIRECTEDOTHERWISE.PROJECT GENERAL NOTES1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, WHICH INCLUDE, BUTARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE OWNER - CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT, THE PROJECT MANUAL(WHICH INCLUDES GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS),DRAWINGS OF ALL DISCIPLINES AND ALL ADDENDA, MODIFICATIONS AND CLARIFICATIONSISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.2.CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ISSUED TO ALL SUBCONTRACTORS BY THEGENERAL CONTRACTOR IN COMPLETE SETS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE FULL EXTENT ANDCOMPLETE COORDINATION OF ALL WORK.3.WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.4.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONDITIONS REQUIRING INFORMATIONOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.5.DETAILS SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO BE INDICATIVE OF THE PROFILES AND TYPE OFDETAILING REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE WORK. DETAILS NOT SHOWN ARE SIMILAR INCHARACTER TO DETAILS SHOWN. WHERE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS, DETAILS OR DESIGNINTENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED, NOTIFY ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK.6.ALL MANUFACTURED ARTICLES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPLIED,INSTALLED, CONNECTED, ERECTED, CLEANED AND CONDITIONED ACCORDING TOMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEENMANUFACTURERS' INSTRUCTIONS AND THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOTIFYARCHITECT/ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.7.ALL DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY ISOLATED FROM EACH OTHER TOAVOID GALVANIC CORROSION.8.THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL INPLACE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE FORGENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF THEKNOWLEDGE OF I & S GROUP, INC. (ISG). NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE IS IMPLIED. THECONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE SIZES, LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL INPLACEUTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.9.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, MINIMUM 3 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION / CONSTRUCTION (811OR 1-800-252-1166).TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYTHIS PROJECT'S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONSISTS OF DATA COLLECTED IN JUNE 2017 BYISG.PROJECT DATUMHORIZONTAL COORDINATES HAVE BEEN REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF1983 (NAD83), 1996 ADJUSTMENT (NAD83(1996)) ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY COORDINATESYSTEM, IN U.S. SURVEY FEET.US 35 W
990989LIGHT POLESFLOOD ZONETHE FLOOD ZONE CLASSIFICATION/LIMITS DEPICTED HEREON, IF ANY, ARE SUBJECT TO MAPSCALE UNCERTAINTY. THE SURVEYED PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT IN AHAZARDOUS FLOOD AREA, ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITYPANEL NO. 27053C0369F. PUBLISHED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY,EFFECTIVE DATE NOVEMBER 4, 2016. FLOOD AREAS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY.66TH STREETMN 62NICOLLET AVENUE
SITE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR:PUD SUBMITTALCIVIL SHEET INDEXC0-10SITE DATAC0-20SITE DETAILSC0-21SITE DETAILSC0-22SITE DETAILSC0-23SITE DETAILSC0-24SITE DETAILSC1-10STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) EXISTING CONDITIONSC1-20STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PROPOSED CONDITIONSC1-30STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTESC1-31STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTESC1-32STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN NOTESC1-33STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN DETAILSC2-10EXISTING SITE & REMOVALS PLANC3-10SITE PLANC3-20SITE UTILITY PLANC4-10SITE GRADING PLANC5-10SITE RESTORATION PLANC5-20PLANTING PLANC5-21PLANT SCHEDULE, NOTES, & DETAILSC6-10PHOTOMETRICS PLAN
66TH STREET
1ST AVENUE SOUTHSTEVENS AVENUE SOUTH135.63
135.62
Temporary Easement
Temporary Easement
SANITARY MH
R = 841.10
I = 831.92
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDING
FFE=845.42'
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDING
FFE=845.42'
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com
CAD FILE NAME SITE PLANS
1 OF 1
0
REFERENCE SCALE
1 INCH = FEET
10 20 40
20
N
PLH - Mixed Use
ISG Project No. 17-20746
SITE PLAN
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
APRIL 20TH, 2018
66TH STREET
1ST AVENUE SOUTHSTEVENS AVENUE SOUTHAC
Temporary Easement
Temporary Easement
SANITARY MH
R = 841.10
I = 831.92
STORM CB-ROUND
R = 845.10
I =
STORM MH
R = 839.38
I = 832.63
STORM CB-ROUND
R = 840.54
I = 834.34
STORM
CB-ROUND
R = 840.11
I = 834.36
STORM MH
R = 839.86
I = 833.75
STORM
CB-ROUND
R = 837.36
I = 833.57
STORM
CB-ROUND
R = 837.22
I = 833.44
STORM MH
R = 838.06
I = 833.25
STORM
CB-ROUND
R = 837.46
I = 833.46
STORM MH
R = 845.44
I = 836.16
STORM
CB-ROUND
R = 837.86
I = 834.56
SANITARY MH
R = 839.20
I(W) = 832.86
I(S) = 829.86
SANITARY MH
R = 846.12
I(E) = 836.86
I(S) = 833.86
ARCHITECTURE + ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL + PLANNING www.is-grp.com
CAD FILE NAME 20746 BUILDING FOOTPRINT
0
REFERENCE SCALE
1 INCH = FEET
10 20 40
20
1 OF 1
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PLH - MIXED USE
ISG Project No. 17-20746
APRIL 16TH, 2018
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE
N
PROPOSED BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'261266TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH
17-20746C3-10MNAMNAATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C3 - SITEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE PLANPLH MIXED USEBUILDING0SCALE IN FEET102018'CONSTRUCT HEAVY DUTYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION(DARK SHADE) (SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEWALK (SEE DETAIL)22'CONSTRUCT TURN-DOWNWALK (SEE DETAIL)(ALONG BUILDING FRONT)PROPOSED COLORED CONCRETEWALK BY COUNTYPROPOSED CONCRETEWALK BY COUNTY24'PARKING SETBACKBUILDING SETBACK6'F&I: HANDICAP SIGN W/ BOLLARD,TYP. OF 2 (SEE DETAIL)F&I: WHITE PARKINGLOT STRIPING (TYP)6'6'R15'REPAIR OR REPLACEBITUMINOUS PAVING ASNECESSARY (MATCH EXISTING)REPAIR OR REPLACEBITUMINOUS PAVING ASNECESSARY (MATCH EXISTING)CONSTRUCT B618CURB & GUTTER(TYP) (SEE DETAIL)10.17'11.37'SECOND FLOOR BALCONY,TYP. (SEE ARCH)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEWALK (SEE DETAIL)R5'R15'R5'R3'R15'R3'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. CONSTRUCT STANDARDBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION(SHADE) (SEE DETAIL)PAVEMENT LEGENDSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY CONCRETEPAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKRETAINING WALL (SEE ARCH)RETAINING WALL (SEE ARCH)F&I: SCREEN FENCE(SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT STANDARDDRIVEWAY APRON, TYP. OF 3(SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN RAMP,TYP. OF 6 (SEE DETAIL)RETAINING WALL (SEE DETAIL)8'8'8'9'11'F&I: BIKE RACK (SEE DETAIL)F&I: "NO RIGHT TURNS"SIGN AND STOP SIGN3.1'19.3'13.2'52.6'31.2'106.1'57.9'19.4'R5'19'R8'R8'5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALARTSNOW STORAGE AREACONSTRUCT D318 CONCRETECURB AND GUTTERCONSTRUCT B618 CONCRETECURB & GUTTERCONSTRUCT B618 CONCRETECURB & GUTTERF&I: STOP SIGN
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH Temporary EasementTemporary Easement84
0
8
4
1
8
4
2
8
4
3
8
4
4845
835
836
837
838
839839 845845844843842
841844845(6) GOLDMOUND SPIREA(3) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(8) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(1) RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK)(1) RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK)(1) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO(9) GOLDMOUND SPIREA(3) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(1) HACKBERRY(1) DWARF WINGED EUONYMUSBUR OAK (1)(3) BLACK HILLS SPRUCEEASTERN RED CEDAR (5)BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (6)EASTERN RED CEDAR (6)DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS (8)EXISTING TREETO REMAINEXISTING TREETO REMAINEDGEREDGEREDGEREDGERSEA GREEN JUNIPER (3)CRANBERRY COTONEASTER (1)SEA GREEN JUNIPER (5)8458458428428438438
4
3
844844844SEA GREEN JUNIPER (4)CRANBERRY COTONEASTER (3)RIVER BIRCH (MULTI-TRUNK) (1)GOLDMOUND SPIREA (16)(6) DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS(8) SEA GREEN JUNIPER(12) GOLDMOUND SPIREAEXISTING ROW OF ARBORVITAE (TO REMAIN)17-20746C5-20--------RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C5 - LANDSCAPEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,PLANTING PLANPLH MIXED USEBUILDING0SCALE IN FEET1020UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING UTILITIESON-SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.TOTAL SITE = 42,699 SF30 TREES SHOWN2 EXISTING TREES (TO BE SAVED)28 PROPOSED TREES96 SHRUBS SHOWN17 TREES REQUIREDCODE: 1 TREE PER 2500 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPE AREA(42,699 / 2500 = 17.1 OR 17 TREES)43 SHRUBS REQUIREDCODE: 1 SHRUB PER 1000 SF OF DEVELOPABLE LANDSCAPE AREA(42,699 / 1000 = 42.7 OR 43 SHRUBS)LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. 5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALART
STORM CBR = 840.01I = 830.39STORM CBR = 838.08I = 831.96STORM CBR = 837.93I = 832.08PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'66TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH Temporary EasementTemporary EasementP-6 60'x 12" @ 1.00%P-4 100'x 12" @ 7.03%I=840.00 (P-6)R=843.86A-6I=839.40 (P-6)I=839.20 (P-5)R=844.10A-5P-5 40'x 12" @ 2.00%I=835.75 (MC-3500 (ISOLATOR ROW))I=838.40 (P-5)R=842.90A-4I=835.75 (MC-3500 (ISOLATOR ROW))I=835.75 (MC-3500 (ACCESS PIPE))I=835.75 (P-7)R=841.41A-3I=841.04 (P-4)I=835.75 (MC-3500 (ACCESS PIPE))R=842.74A-2P-7 38'x 12" @ 12.68%I=840.57 (P-7)R=842.27A-7P-118 60'x 12" @ 0.38%I=832.28 (P-118)I=832.28 (P-2)I=840.80 (P-3)R=844.22A-1P-3 6'x 12" @ 2.00%P-2 5'x 12" @ 1.50%STORM DRAIN SCHEDULESTRUCTURE NO.A-1A-2A-3A-4A-5A-6A-7STRUCTURETYPEDRAIN BASINSEE DETAILMnDOT 4020MnDOT 4020CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1)CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1)INLINE DRAINSTRUCTURESIZE (In)15 Ø48 Ø48 Ø48 Ø36 x 2436 x 2412 ØSTRUCTUREMATERIALPVCRCRCRCRCRCPVCCASTINGFrame Grate CoverNEENAH R-1926-7NEENAH R-3015 TYPE VBNEENAH R-3015 TYPE VBNEENAH R-3067 TYPE VBNEENAH R-3067 TYPE VBFrame Grate CoverPAY HEIGHTLN FT11.946.995.667.154.903.861.70TOP OF CASTINGELEVATION844.22842.74841.41842.90844.10843.86842.27INVERTELEVATION832.28835.75835.75835.75839.20840.00840.57OUTLETPIPEP-118P-4MC-3500 (ACCESS PIPE)MC-3500 (ISOLATOR ROW)P-5P-6P-7STORM DRAIN PIPE SCHEDULEPIPENO.P-2P-3P-4P-5P-6P-7P-118DRAINFROMACO DrainROOF LEADERA-2A-5A-6A-7A-1INLETELEVATION832.35840.92841.04839.20840.00840.57832.28DRAINTOA-1A-1EX-1A-4A-5A-3EX-1OUTLETELEVATION832.28840.80834.00838.40839.40835.75832.05PIPESIZE (IN)12121212121212MATERIALPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPVCPIPECLASSSCH 40SCH 40SCH 40SCH 40SCH 40SCH 40SCH 40PIPEGRADE1.50%2.00%7.03%2.00%1.00%12.68%0.38%PIPELENGTH (FT)561004060386017-20746C3-20MNAMNAATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C3 - SITEREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE UTILITY PLANPLH MIXED USEBUILDING0SCALE IN FEET1020PROPOSED TRANSFORMERLOCATION (COORDINATE W/UTILITY COMPANY)CONNECT 6" WATER SERVICETO INPLACE STUB(VERIFY DEPTH & LOCATION)CONSTRUCT ELECTRICAL SERVICE(COORDINATE W/ UTILITY COMPANY)CONSTRUCT GAS SERVICE(COORDINATE W/ UTILITY COMPANY)UTILITY LEGENDEXISTINGPROPOSEDSTORM DRAINSANITARY SEWERSANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINWATER MAINGASOVERHEAD ELECTRICUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND TVOVERHEAD UTILITYUNDERGROUND UTILITYFIBER OPTICNOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES.F&I: (2) 6" 45° BENDF&I: 6" SANITARYSERVICE AT 2% MIN.F&I: HYDRANT &VALVE (SEE DETAIL)F&I: 6" WATERLINECONNECT TO EXISTING X"WATER LINE (FIELD VERIFYLOCATION, DEPTH, & SIZE)CONNECT TO EXISTING STORMSTRUCTURE (FIELD VERIFYLOCATION, DEPTH, & SIZE)I = 832.05 (P-4)I = 834.00 (P-1)F&I: TEECONNECT 6" SANITARY TO INPLACE X" STUB(FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, DEPTH, & SIZE)I = 835.24F&I: (2) 6" 45° BENDF&I: SANITARY C/OR = 844.70I = 836.72NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. F&I: ACO K2-5 CHANNEL (SEE DETAIL)CONSTRUCT STORMTECH MC-3500UNDERGROUND SYSTEM (SEE DETAILS)CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE TO 5'FROM BUILDING, CONNECTION INTOBUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTORGAS SERVICE TO BE CONSTRUCTED UP TO5' FROM BUILDING, CONNECTION INTOBUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTORELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE CONSTRUCTEDUP TO 5' FROM BUILDING, CONNECTION INTOBUILDING BY MECHANICAL CONTRACTORCONSTRUCT 32 LF 6"PVC STORM DRAIN @ 1%F&I: 6"x12"x12" WYENOTE: RIM AND TOP OF CASTING EQUALS TOP BACK OF CURB5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALARTF&I: 12" BACKFLOW CHECK VALVEFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONREPLACE CASTINGWITH NEENAH R-3238
PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDINGFFE=845.42'STORM CBR = 840.01I = 830.39STORM CBR = 838.08I = 831.96STORM CBR = 837.93I = 832.0866TH STREET1ST AVENUE SOUTH
STEVENS AVENUE SOUTH Temporary EasementTemporary Easement84
0
8
4
1
8
4
2
8
4
3
8
4
4845
835
836
837
838
839839 845-0.7%-1.5%
-1.6%845844843842
841844845-3.6%
-2.1%
-3.5%
-2.6%
-1.2%
-947.6%-10.8%8458458438
4
3
844844840
839839
839841
842843844 840
841
842
843
844844843845 845.20840.79845.25845.08841.59842.00841.428
4
3
.
9
9
8
4
4
.
2
5H.P
.839.89MATCH8
4
3
.
5
4 844.69844.39844.22MATCH843.86L.P.8
4
3
.
5
7843.488
4
2
.
7
6
8
4
2
.
1
5
841
.
6
7
840.73840.63844.358
4
4
.
3
5 834.42844.928
3
8
.
9
2
8
3
9
.
0
1
838.93839.09845.298
4
5
.
3
0
8
4
5
.
3
0
8
4
5
.
3
0
845.308
4
3
.
1
9
839.41839.40839.57839.778
4
4
.
9
2
839.28839.29840.93841.02845.33FLUSH845.33845.33845.42844.73844.64844.61845.15FLUSH845.57845.27844.94844.83844.71844.92845.01845.11841.66843
.
1
3
841
.
5
7
8
4
0
.
1
8
8
4
0
.
2
7
845.22845.22844.06844.15843.79844.97845.41 845.25845.42845.378
4
3
.
2
2
8
4
2
.
0
2
8
4
4
.
1
0
838.97BW839.01TW844.73TW844.92844.898
4
2
.
0
0TW845.10839.17839.18839.24841
.
0
7 844.2217-20746C4-10MNAMNAATB-RICHFIELDMINNESOTA3/23/18PROJECT NO.FILE NAMEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYTITLEORIGINAL ISSUE DATECLIENT PROJECT NO.SHEET20746 C4 - GRADINGREVIEWED BYREVISION SCHEDULEPROJECTDATEDESCRIPTIONBYWITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATEDTHIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,SITE GRADINGPLANPLH MIXED USEBUILDING0SCALE IN FEET1020GRADING LEGENDEXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL)EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL)PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR INTERVAL)PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR INTERVAL)PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB SPOT ELEVATIONSURFACE GRADE / DIRECTIONGENERAL GRADING NOTESPROPOSED CONTOURS SHOW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS. BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT HOLDDOWNS ARE NOT INCLUDED.101100101100XXX.XXXXX.XX-X.X%NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO.DATELIC. NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.PRELIMINARYANDREW T. BRANDEL47078B.M. ELEVATION=841.76TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE STEVENS AVENUE AND66TH STREET INTERSECTION. SEE TURN DOWN WALKTRANSITION DETAIL5/16/18CITY RESUBMITTALARTGRADE SWALE TO ENSUREPOSITIVE DRAINAGE ONTO STREET
A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
166' - 8"200' - 0"
33 STALLS
MECHANICAL
SPACE
MECHANICAL
SPACE
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
LOBBY
001
2
A3-11
_____________________64' - 8"36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"14' - 1"8' - 3"1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B
C
2
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"
3 4 5 6 7
19
2 10 2
20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"MOTORCYCLE
PARKING
10' - 0"9' - 4"
9' - 8"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"7' - 8"9' - 4"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"11' - 4"
9' - 8"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"1' - 4"9' - 0"9' - 0"11' - 4"TYP21' - 0"24' - 8"TYP21' - 0"22' - 4"22' - 4"PARKING
000
ELEVATORSTAIR
003
STAIR
002
WALL MOUNTED BICYCLE
HANGER, (1) TYP AT EACH
PARKING STALL
000B
001003A
002A
002B
003B
25' - 4"16' - 0"25' - 4"FDFD FD FD FD FD
N
01/2"1"2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:23:50 AM
A1-20
LOWER LEVEL
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-20
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGENDPLAN SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DDN
DWREF.A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
1485 SF
COMMERCIAL 1
115
STAIR
103
ELEVATOR
200' - 0"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________66' - 8"B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
1507 SF
COMMERCIAL 3
117
1436 SF
COMMERCIAL 4
118
STORAGE
108
UNIT TYPE 2
109
UNIT TYPE 1A
110
UNIT TYPE 2
112
UNIT TYPE 1
113 UNIT TYPE 5
107
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"44' - 4"6' - 6"1' - 10"12' - 0"2' - 0"1' - 10"12' - 6"CIRCULATION
106
VESTIBULE
104
VESTIBULE / MAIL
105
TRASH ENCLOSURE
120
1506 SF
COMMERCIAL 2
116
COMMON AREA
101
EXIT CORRIDOR
001
STAIR
102
MAILBOXES
14' - 1"6' - 0"11' - 11"3' - 4"12' - 1"4' - 9"11' - 1"6' - 0"16' - 9"6' - 0"18' - 5"6' - 0"44' - 9"8' - 6"30' - 4"
36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"
4' - 0"12' - 0"6' - 0"12' - 0"6' - 0"12' - 0"8' - 0"12' - 0"8' - 0"12' - 0"8' - 0"12' - 0"51' - 9"9' - 0"27' - 3"
COMMUNITY ROOM
111
120A 120B
103 105A116C
104A
102
104B
116B 116A 117A 118A 111B
119B118B117B115C
105B
115B
114
FITNESS
119
111A
119A
TOILET
114
N
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:23:55 AM
A1-21
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-21
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGEND
PLAN SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
UNIT LEGEND
TOTAL FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGES
LOWER LEVEL: 13,333 PARKING = 13,333 SF TOTAL
FIRST FLOOR: 7,016 RESIDENTIAL + 6,124 RETAIL = 13,138 SF TOTAL
SECOND FLOOR: 13,117 RESIDENTIAL = 13,117 SF TOTAL
THIRD FLOOR: 13,117 RESIDENTIAL = 13,117 SF TOTAL
52,705 TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
STUDIO - 1 BED TYPES - 10 UNITS
1ST FLOOR - 2
2ND FLOOR - 4
3RD FLOOR - 4
1 BEDROOM TYPE - 10 UNITS
1ST FLOOR - 2
2ND FLOOR - 4
3RD FLOOR - 4
2 BEDROOM TYPES - 11 UNITS
1ST FLOOR - 1
2ND FLOOR - 5
3RD FLOOR - 5
TOTAL UNIT MIX
10 - STUDIO - 32%
10 - 1 BEDROOM - 32%
11 - 2 BEDROOM - 35%
31 TOTAL UNITS
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/DREF.W/DDWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/D
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/D
A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
UNIT TYPE 4
205 UNIT TYPE 3
208
UNIT TYPE 2
207
UNIT TYPE 3
204 UNIT TYPE 4
212
UNIT TYPE 1A
219
UNIT TYPE 2
218
ELEVATOR
2
A3-11
_____________________
UNIT TYPE 2
209
UNIT TYPE 1A
216
UNIT TYPE 2
217
STORAGE
215
1 8
A
D 66' - 8"200' - 0"
1
A3-11
_____________________
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"
B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
UNIT TYPE 1
206
UNIT TYPE 1
210
UNIT TYPE 3
211
20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"CORRIDOR
249
CIRCULATION
201
STAIR
203
STAIR
202
36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"
202
215
203
N
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:00 AM
A1-22
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-22
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGENDPLAN SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/DREF.W/DDWREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW REF.DWW/D
REF.DW
W/D
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DA2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
2
A3-11
_____________________
UNIT TYPE 1A
314
1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
UNIT TYPE 4
305
UNIT TYPE 1
306
UNIT TYPE 2
307
UNIT TYPE 3
308
UNIT TYPE 2
309
UNIT TYPE 1
310
UNIT TYPE 3
311
UNIT TYPE 6
312
UNIT TYPE 2
315
UNIT TYPE 2
316
UNIT TYPE 1A
317
UNIT TYPE 3
304
200' - 0"
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"66' - 8"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"ELEVATORSTAIR
303
STAIR
302
STORAGE
313
CORRIDOR
252
CIRCULATION
301
36' - 8"10' - 0"94' - 4"19' - 4"39' - 8"
302
313
303
N
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:06 AM
A1-23
THIRD FLOOR
PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
09/12/17
400 20746 A1-23
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
KEYNOTE LEGENDPLAN SHEET NOTES
1. ALL INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS SHALL BE WALL TYPE __,
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
REF.DWW/DREF.DWW/DREF.W/DDW
REF.DWW/D
REF.
DW
W/D
REF.DWW/DA
B
3
UNIT TYPE 1
206
17' - 0 3/8" AT 1A
15' - 4 3/8"3' - 2 3/8"
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
18' - 6 3/4"30' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"3' - 4"7' - 2 7/8" AT 1A
5' - 6 7/8"5' - 7"2' - 5"4' - 11 7/8"1' - 6"12' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"8' - 8 3/4"4' - 2 1/2"CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"6' - 5 3/4"5
434
1 46' - 1 7/8"
3' - 0"
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
20' - 2 3/4" AT 1A
A
B
3
UNIT TYPE 2
207
5
7
2 4361
DEMISING FACE TO FACE
25' - 1 3/4"
10' - 7 7/8"3' - 4 3/4"11' - 1 1/8"30' - 6"9' - 3 7/8"5' - 7"5' - 0"5' - 2 7/8"1' - 6"4' - 6"6' - 4 7/8"12' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"12' - 11 1/4"4' - 2 1/2"CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"
A
B
4 5
UNIT TYPE 3
208
DEMISE FACE TO FACE
35' - 1 3/4"30' - 6"13' - 3 5/8"6' - 5"10' - 9 3/8"2' - 0"3' - 8 3/8"1' - 3"
6' - 11 3/8"
10' - 11 1/8"3' - 4 3/4"10' - 5 1/4"10' - 4 5/8"2' - 1 1/8"13' - 5"4' - 2 1/2"17' - 0"12' - 0"5' - 0"13' - 6"5' - 11 3/8"5' - 0"5' - 5"12' - 9"6' - 0 3/8"1' - 6"5
2
4
261
3
7
3CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"
CLEAR
5' - 0"CLEAR3' - 0"1
A
B
2
52 33
46
12
47GRID TO DEMISING FACE
36' - 1 7/8"GRID TO DEMISING FACE35' - 7 3/8"10' - 11 3/8"3' - 4 3/4"10' - 6 1/4"10' - 9"18' - 5"5' - 0 1/2"12' - 8 3/8"3' - 10 1/4"6' - 1"4' - 2 1/2"
15' - 11"3' - 9 1/2"5' - 11 1/2"10' - 5 7/8"1' - 6"13' - 9 3/4"4' - 10 1/4"3' - 4 1/2"6' - 11 1/2"12' - 11 3/4"5' - 8 1/4"4' - 10 1/2"6' - 6 1/8"
CLEAR
4' - 0"CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
3' - 0"CLEAR5' - 0"UNIT TYPE 4
205
8
D
C
7
14' - 3"5' - 6"4' - 4 1/2"15' - 4"1' - 6"24' - 4"6' - 2"11' - 2 5/8"10' - 0"3' - 4 3/4"11' - 0"9' - 9"4' - 6"10' - 2 3/4"4' - 6"626423' - 6"15' - 4"
UNIT TYPE 6
312
20' - 3 7/8"3' - 6"15' - 4"
4' - 9 1/4"61
4
43' - 7 3/4"CLEAR
4' - 0"6' - 5"3' - 8"CLEAR5' - 0"8
A
B
GRID TO DEMISING FACE
26' - 1 7/8"
4' - 4 3/8"9' - 8 1/4"12' - 1 1/4"GRID TO DEMISING FACE30' - 2 3/8"25' - 11 7/8"4' - 2 1/2"9' - 3 7/8"5' - 7"5' - 0"6' - 3"
UNIT TYPE 5
107
8' - 0"4' - 6"5' - 0 3/4"12' - 11 1/4"3' - 9 3/4"
4' - 8 1/4"1' - 6"5
1 642
37
CLEAR3' - 0"CLEAR
4' - 0"01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:13 AM
A1-24
TYPICAL UNIT
PLANS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
10/17/17
400 20746 A1-24
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/4" = 1'-0"1 UNIT TYPE 1 & 1A - STUDIO (1 - 580 SF - 5 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"2 UNIT TYPE 2 - 1 BEDROOM (783 SF - 10 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"3 UNIT TYPE 3 - 2 BEDROOM (1086 SF - 6 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"4 UNIT TYPE 4 - 2 BEDROOM (1194 SF - 3 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"5 UNIT TYPE 6 - 2 BEDROOM (1290 SF - 1 INSTANCE)
(1A - 633 SF - 5 INSTANCES)
1/4" = 1'-0"6 UNIT TYPE 5 - 1 BEDROOM (798 SF - 1 INSTANCE)
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
A2-122
A2-12
A2-11
A2-11
1
2
1
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8
A
D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B
C
2 3 4 5 6 7
37' - 5"112' - 9"10' - 10 3/4"38' - 11 1/4"20' - 4"26' - 0"20' - 4"66' - 8"66' - 8"200' - 0"
28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"28' - 4"30' - 0"
8 3/16"12' - 0 13/16"186' - 6 13/16"8 3/16"66' - 8"20' - 8"1' - 10"12' - 6"N
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:18 AM
A1-71
ROOF PLAN
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A1-71
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
2
A3-11
_____________________
18234567
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-1
EF-3EF-3
EF-1
EF-3 EF-3 EF-3
EF-4
EF-5 EF-5 EF-5
EF-4EF-4EF-4EF-4EF-4EF-4
EF-1EF-1EF-1EF-1EF-1EF-1
EF-3
EF-2
EF-5
S5 S5 S5 S5 S5
EF-5
EF-6EF-6
EF-5
EF-2EF-2 EF-2
EF-5EF-5
EF-2
EF-6
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
A D
1
A3-11
_____________________
B C
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-2
EF-3 EF-2
EF-1
EF-4
EF-5
EF-1EF-1
EF-4
S5
EF-5
EF-6
EF-3
EF-5
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:30 AM
A2-11
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A2-11
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONEXTERIOR WALL MATERIAL SCHEDULE AND TAKEOFF
MARK MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODEL / COLOR COMMENTS
APROX
AREA
EF-1 STONE VENEER 4442 SF
EF-2 LAP SIDING LP SMARTSIDE LITE COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY 2155 SF
EF-3 18" x 120" FIBER CEMENT SIDING NICIHA VINTAGE WOOD LITE CEDAR COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY 7547 SF
EF-4 BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING LP SMARTSIDE WHITE COLOR INSTALL VERTICALLY 926 SF
EF-5 18" x 72" FIBER CEMENT PANELS NICHIHA GREY COLOR INSTALL HORIZONTALLY 1876 SF
EF-6 PAINT BLACK 949 SF
NOTE:
ALL QUANTITIES IN "AREA" ARE APPROXIMITE
AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THESE
NUMBERS ARE NOT GUARANTEED AND NOT
INTENDED TO BE REPLACEMENTS FOR SHOP
DRAWINGS OR PHYSICAL DRAWING
EVALUATIONS AND TAKEOFFS.
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
SIGNAGE
MARK WIDTH HEIGHT
TEXT
HEIGHT COUNT
S1 4' - 9" 2' - 0" 0' - 9" 1
S2 6' - 0" 2' - 0" 0' - 9" 4
S3 8' - 6" 2' - 0" 1' - 0" 1
S5 12' - 0" 3' - 0" 1' - 6" 6
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8234567
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-1
EF-1 EF-1
EF-4 EF-4
EF-1
EF-5 EF-5
EF-2
EF-1
EF-4
EF-1
EF-4
EF-1
EF-2
EF-1
EF-1
S2 S1 S2 S2 S2
S3
EF-3
EF-2 EF-3 EF-3
EF-2 EF-3 EF-2
EF-3
EF-6
EF-5EF-5
EF-3
EF-5EF-5EF-5
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
AD
1
A3-11
_____________________
BC
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
EF-1
EF-2
EF-1
EF-3
EF-5
EF-6
EF-2EF-3
EF-5
01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:42 AM
A2-12
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A2-12
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
TOP OF FOOTING
88' - 6"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
A D
1
A3-11
_____________________
A3-11
3
B C
SECOND FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
112' - 10 1/4"
THIRD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
124' - 0 1/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
135' - 2"
UNIT TYPE 3
208
UNIT TYPE 2
217
UNIT TYPE 3
308
UNIT TYPE 2
315
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
COMMUNITY ROOM
111
CIRCULATION
106
CORRIDOR
249
CORRIDOR
252
PARKING
000
FITNESS
119
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
TOP OF FOOTING
88' - 6"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
2
A3-11
_____________________
1 8234567
SECOND FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
112' - 10 1/4"
THIRD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
124' - 0 1/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
135' - 2"
UNIT TYPE 4
205
UNIT TYPE 3
208
UNIT TYPE 2
207
UNIT TYPE 4
212
COMMERCIAL 1
115
UNIT TYPE 2
209
UNIT TYPE 1
206
UNIT TYPE 1
210
UNIT TYPE 3
211
UNIT TYPE 4
305
UNIT TYPE 1
306
UNIT TYPE 2
307
UNIT TYPE 3
308
UNIT TYPE 2
309
UNIT TYPE 1
310
UNIT TYPE 3
311
UNIT TYPE 6
312
COMMERCIAL 2
116
COMMERCIAL 3
117
COMMERCIAL 4
118
UNIT TYPE 2
109
UNIT TYPE 2
112
UNIT TYPE 1
113
UNIT TYPE 5
107
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
COMMUNITY ROOM
111
CIRCULATION
106
TRASH ENCLOSURE
120
PARKING
000
FIRST FLOOR
100' - 0"
SECOND FLOOR
115' - 0"
TOP OF FOOTING
88' - 6"
LOWER LEVEL
89' - 0"
THIRD FLOOR
126' - 1 7/8"
ROOF
137' - 2"
A
12" INSULATED PRECAST WALL (3" CONC,
3" INSUL, 6" CONC)
6" CONCRETE SLAB
FOOTING
8" HOLLOW CORE PLANK WITH 2" TOPPING
EXTERIOR FINISH
1 1/2" ZIP WALL SHEATINGSYSTEM (SHEATHING,
CONTINUOUS CI R-6.6 AND WEATHER BARRIER)
2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ R-20 BATT INSULATION,
6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER
5/8" GYP BD
GYPCRETE
T&G SHEATHING
24" DEEP TRUSSES
RESILIENT CHANNEL
5/8" GYP BD
SECOND FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
112' - 10 1/4"
THIRD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING
124' - 0 1/8"
ROOF TRUSS BEARING
135' - 2"
LOW PARAPET
140' - 2"
HIGH PARAPET
142' - 2"
GYPCRETE
T&G SHEATHING
24" DEEP TRUSSES
RESILIENT CHANNEL
5/8" GYP BD
EXTERIOR FINISH
1 1/2" ZIP WALL SHEATINGSYSTEM (SHEATHING,
CONTINUOUS CI R-6.6 AND WEATHER BARRIER)
2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" OC W/ R-20 BATT INSULATION,
6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER
5/8" GYP BD
R30 INSULATION BASE W/ EPDM ROOF
MEMBRANE
T&G SHEATHING
24" DEEP TRUSSES
RESILIENT CHANNEL
5/8" GYP BD
8' - 11"10' - 2"12' - 9 1/8"8' - 11"01/2" 1" 2"1/4"REFERENCE SCALE1" = 1"SHEET
PROJECT
THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF I & S GROUP,
INC. AND MAY NOT BE USED, COPIED OR DUPLICATED
WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
PROJECT NO.
FILE NAME
DRAWN BY
DESIGNED BY
ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE
CLIENT PROJECT NO.
TITLE
REVIEWED BY
DATE LIC. NO.
DATE LIC. NO.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED
ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
5/17/2018 11:24:52 AM
A3-11
BUILDING
SECTIONS
PLH MIXED USE
BUILDING
RICHFIELD MINNESOTA
400 20746 A3-11
17-20746
PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 BUILDING SECTION
1/8" = 1'-0"1 BUILDING SECTION
1/4" = 1'-0"3 TYPICAL WALL SECTION
REVISION SCHEDULE
DATE DESCRIPTION BY
05/16/18 CITY RESUBMITTAL DJR
66th Street East 66th Street East
Nicollet AvenuePortland AvenueRichfield Pkwy66th Street East Development Pattern
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125 Miles
I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\City Planner\Projects\Landuse\66th Street E developm ent pattern 051118.m xd
Land Use
Non-Single Family Residential Land Use
PLH Development Site
67TH
66TH1ST3RD2ND 5TH65TH
4THSTEVENSNICOLLETAPPLE
CLINTONPORTLAND6 6 T H
PORTLAND66th Street Land Use - Nicollet Avenue to Portland Avenue
º
0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet
Land Use
Apartment
Commercial
Detached Residential
Mixed Use
Public / Quasi-Public
Park
PUB
ROW
Vacant
Railroad
SCH
Duplex
66TH ST W 1ST AVE S2ND AVE SSTEVENS AVENICOLLET AVE65TH ST W
66TH ST E
65TH ST E
67TH ST E67TH ST W PLEASANT AVEGRAND AVE S101 66th St Site Boundary
Planned Land Use
Low Density Res.
Medium Density Res.
High Density Res.
Neighborhood Comm.
Community Comm.
Regional Comm.
Mixed Use
Quasi-public / Institutional
Park
Water
Right of W ay 0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet
±
DRAFT Comprehensive Plan Designations - 66th Street & Nicollet Avenue Area
Hub
Holy Angels
R
R
R
R
MIXED
MIXED
MIXED
MIXED
CCO
CCO
LDR
LDR
LDR LDRLDRLDR
LDR
LDR
LDRLDRLDR
LDR
LDRLDR LDRLDR
LDR
LDR LDR LDR LDR
LDR LDR LDR
LDR
LDR
LDRLDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LDR
CCO
C-2
C-2
R
R
R RRR
R
R
RRR
R
RR RR
R
R R R R
R R R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
C-2
±
101 66th Street E - CP RZN PUD 5/2018Surrounding Zoning and Comprehensive Plan
0 250 500 750 1,000125FeetZoning:C-2 - General CommercialR - Single Family Residential 350 ftI:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\101 66th St E - Z.mxd
66TH STREETNICOLLET AVENUE1ST AVENUESTEVENS AVENUE65TH STREET
67TH STREET
Comp Plan:CCO - Community Commercial/OfficeLDR - Low Density ResidentialMIXED - Mixed Use
HOLY ANGELS
HUB
Legend
Development site
350 ft. notification area
1
Matt Brillhart
From:Kathleen Balaban <kbalaban@emcorganics.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 31, 2018 7:51 AM
To:Pat Elliott; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; Simon Trautmann; Maria Regan Gonzalez;
John Stark; Melissa Poehlman; soleary@richfield.gov; dkitzberger@richfield.gov;
srosenberg@richfield.gov; ahoberg@richfield.gov; bpynn@richfield.gov;
kquam@richfield.gov; jrudolph@richfield.gov; Matt Brillhart
Cc:jml8839@comcast.net
Subject:66th and Stevens Mixed Use Zone
To My Elected and Appointed City Representatives:
My name is Kathleen Balaban and I own the home at 6526 Stevens Ave So and was unable to attend the Planning
Commission Meeting on May 29th.However, I was able to view the session on-line and was disappointed with the
decision for mixed-use zoning, but I understand the need for increased density in our growing city.I thank the Planning
Commission and City Council members for working with the residents by requiring the developer, Paul Lynch, to work
closer with us in the next few weeks and am unsure if that will truly happen.It was quite evident that the developer’s
last efforts were surface based and miniscule at best and made no real effort to meet with us as noted by Julie Lapensky
during the meeting.I am asking my elected and appointed city officials to hold this developer and our ‘city staff’
accountable to his efforts or lack thereof to work with us before the June 12 th meeting. Personally, I think small group
meetings can be more productive than open houses and am expecting Mr. Lynch to, at the very least, reach out to Julie
Lapensky, as our neighborhood representative to further consider and make needed changes.
It was noted during a City Council meeting that the developer didn’t communicate enough with the residents, when the
onus of this and any other project belongs to the city of Richfield.I applaud Edwina for her comments at the City Council
meeting pertaining to the lack of communication and potentially lack of experience by this specific developer.We may
want and need additional density in our city, but we may not want and/or need this specific developer’s lack of
experience, lack of communication and lack of flexibility in design and scope.Brick walls, deaf ears, heels dug in the dirt
and enlarged egos make it very difficult to come to any common ground.If the project on Lyndale can be passed with
lowered number of units from the original proposal, this project can be successful too with less residential units to
better fit the lot size and residential neighborhood.
One of the requested items noted by the residents is ‘no thru’ traffic going north and/or south on Stevens.This is not a
developer’s decision, but yours.Due to the new zoning and proposed development with added retail, my neighbors and
I would like to change that intersection to a pedestrian use crossing only.This would lower the traffic from drivers going
north/south on Stevens to 67th, 65th or 64th to avoid the round-a-bout.
This is an opportune time to make that change and a chance to further support us with this unwanted mixed use
zoning.It is going to take your action now to require that change while the crews are working on the sewer system an d
have not begun that intersection’s reconstruction yet.One of my neighbors is blind and there are no sidewalks on
Stevens forcing her into the street, as she uses public transportation.The lack of thru traffic on 66th and Stevens will
lower the traffic making our street safer and quieter once again.
Thank you again for your demonstrated support for our efforts to communicate with the developer and the appropriate
city representatives with any concerns pertaining to this specific project and am hoping that there is some downsizing of
this proposed building and no thru traffic on Stevens when this and the 66th Street project is completed.
Respectfully,
Kathleen Balaban
6526 Stevens Ave So
612-869-8311
1
Matt Brillhart
From:Husniyah Dent Bradley <dent_h@hotmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, April 26, 2018 11:29 AM
To:Melissa Poehlman; John Stark; Matt Brillhart; Pat Elliott; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia;
Simon Trautmann; Maria Regan Gonzalez; J Dent
Subject:Comments about Zoning Ordinance Change on 66th between Stevens Ave and 1st Ave
in Richfield
Hello,
I wanted to send along several of the comments that I made at the community section of the Richfield
Planning Commission held on Monday, April 23, 2018, concerning the mixed use zoning ordinance for the
property at 66th Street between 1st Avenue and Stevens Avenue in Richfield.
I am a long time resident of 66th and Stevens Avenue in Richfield and have driven down that street at
different times of the day and night.
Things to consider for this project:
It is a fairly quiet street and does not have a lot of traffic driving down it.We do have children that
walk down the street from time-to-time due to there being no sidewalks
Proper notice of the public meeting was not done -residents complained of receiving the notice a day
before or after the date, typically a notice is sent 10 days in advance
When there was construction on 66th street last year more traffic drove down the street in order to
get around the barriers that were placed in the middle of 6 6th street.
If a mixed use complex is built on that corner it will cause a lot more traffic in the area
It is currently sometimes difficult to see oncoming traffic when you are stopped at the stop sign,
especially when a driver is driving fast or the sun is blocking the view, a lot of vehicles do not see who
is at that corner until they reach the top of the hill driving East towards Portland
Traffic speeds up after they leave Nicollet Avenue and it is sometimes hard to make a stop before
turning right on to 66th and Stevens -when snow is on the ground or ice, your vehicle will slide into
the turn
If a large building is built on that corner then it will make it even more difficult to see on -coming traffic
at the stop sign and snow removal will be a probl em
As you drive from East to West on 66th street you can tell that there is a hill and the top of the hill
meets on 1st avenue -is the building going to level this area out or will the hill remain?
There are people that live on the street that sleep during the day and work at night -a lot of noise will
disrupt their sleep and sleep patterns
If a popular restaurant leases space in the complex then there will be parking issues as seen in St. Paul
and Minneapolis, where residents are complaining about the patrons taking all of the parking spaces
on the street so they do not have spaces for their family or guests -the same thing will occur if the
complex has a meeting room or hospitality room
If people are not able to find parking on the same street as th e complex then they will park on 65th
and Stevens or 65th and 1st Avenue
If residents or customers of the complex take up all of the street parking on Stevens Ave on both sides
then there will not be a lot of room for EMS -the other week when EMS had to respond to an incident
2
they had to park in between two vehicles that were parked on either side of the street and could not
make it up the driveway of the home.
The mixed use complex will have an open ended driveway where people can drive through the
driveway and this could cause an issue
The parking lot entrance and underground parking entrance is across the street from other driveways -
this could make it difficult for the homeowner to get out of their driveway at peak times of the day
On 1st Ave and 66th they are about to allow restaurant patrons from Lakeside Grill to park on that side
of the street so they will be competing for parking spots as well
Can the lot on 1st Ave and 66th be turned into a parking lot?
Brixmor Properties has had a tough time leasing spaces at the Hub (maybe due to high lease rates and
building issues -roof, upkeep, etc.)-how are the developers going to ensure that their spaces will be
leased?
There are no affordable housing units planned for the project, not even 10%
The developers are asking for additional changes to the space that were not initially disclosed when
the project was presented -building it out to the corner, etc.
The developers do not know exactly where trash will be collected, where deliveries for commerc ial
space will come in through or other delicate details that need to be ironed out
It is great that the developers want to redevelop the property.They are not from MN and are not
connected to the community but they have purchased the property and are e ager to get
started.Hopefully this project will not have a huge impact on the value of the homes in the area, etc.
I hope that everyone is able to visit the location and observe it for 10 minutes or so to get a feel of the type of
area it is.
Thanks,
Husniyah Dent Bradley
1
Matt Brillhart
From:Cynthia Norton <cnorton54@comcast.net>
Sent:Tuesday, April 24, 2018 11:51 AM
To:Pat Elliott; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; Maria Regan Gonzalez; John Stark; Melissa
Poehlman; Matt Brillhart
Subject:Post 04/23 Meeting Re Mixed-Use Development at 6601 & 6605 1st Ave & 6600 &
6608 Stevens Ave
If the Planning Commission approves the highly opposed zoning change to multi-use for the parcel
at 66th Street and Stevens and First Ave. South after receiving numerous phone calls, emails and
after listening to 3 hours of heartfelt opposition from longtime and new homeowners directly impacted
by changing zoning to this parcel it will be clear none of you sitting on the volunteer Planning
Commission or the elected City Council care about the long -time loyal homeowner's in Richfield.
Remember we are the citizens who pay the taxes that support Richfield. It is our tax dollars that allow
volunteers and elected officials to sit like stoic statues with your eyes glued to monitor screens
instead of looking into the eyes and faces of citizens whose dail y lives are impacted by the unwanted
decisions you impose upon us.
*Since Sean, the volunteer Commission Chair does not have an email address please forward my
email to him.
Cynthia Norton
132 E. 66th St.
Richfield, MN 55423
2
Matt Brillhart
From:Nancy Norton <nnorton9977@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 24, 2018 12:29 AM
To:Pat Elliott; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; Maria Regan Gonzalez; John Stark; Melissa
Poehlman; Matt Brillhart; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; Simon Trautmann
Subject:Re: NO Mixed-Use Development at 6601 & 6605 1st Ave & 6600 & 6608 Stevens Ave
One more very important item the Richfield taxpaying residents said:
1. Home prices will go DOWN as people don't want to live next to appartment buildings.
2. People who purchased homes within the last 1-3 years said they WOULD NOT HAVE PURCHASED if they
knew about the mixed use development.
This alone is a HUGE reason to NOT approve the mixed use development. Richfield will not only have 35%-
45% of commercial buildings vacant at The Hub but Richfield homes may also sit vacant or the Richfield house
prices may get so low and will negatively impact Richfield.
Don't approve the mixed use development, it will negatively impact Richfield.
Nancy Norton
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, 11:05 PM Nancy Norton <nnorton9977@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, You missed a great Planning Commission Meeting tonight. The taxpaying Richfield residents learned the
City Members have been working with this Wisconsin builder since 2015 and has known about the Zoning
Changes for years and only sent out a small card to the Richfield residents a few weeks ago. The builder sent
out a letter a few days ago, which I received the day AFTER the meeting, that the builder wanted to share his
building plans with the Richfield residents.
It was VERY CLEAR the Richfield taxpaying residents DON'T WANT mixed use development as about 15-
20 Richfield residents spoke tonight AGAINST mixed use development and how they would APPROVE
single family homes built on this property. Not one Richfield resident had anything positive to say abo ut mixed
use development, everyone is AGAINST it.
We also learned traffic volumes at peak times will increase to about 91vehicles per hour from our current
volume 10-15 vehicles per hour. There is also not enough parking for residents, workers, handicapp ed, visitors
of residents and Stevens Avenue & 1st Avenue should expect both sides of our streets to be used as additional
parking. This will cause issues for Emergency Vehicles and Police as well as residents trying to get into their
own driveway. In the winter it will be awful for residents as the snow plows will not be able to clear our
streets. Residents are also concerned about the volume of vehicles making turns out of Stevens Avenue & 1st
Avenue to 66th Street and not being able to clearly see traffic, bikers and pedestrian with the huge cement
building blocking the view.
PLEASE, don't approve Mixed Use Development for this area, as it's very clear, this is not the correct location,
Richfield taxpaying residents don't want the additional traffic and congestion.
Thank You
Nancy Norton
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 10:40 AM Nancy Norton <nnorton9977@gmail.com> wrote:
3
CRIME will also be increased with additional unnecessary businesses and traffic. W e had crime already at the
Dairy Queen, Country Buffet, Best Buy and other businesses. Richfield should be making efforts to eliminate
crime not bring it into our neighborhood.
Single family homes would be the best use for this property.
Nancy Norton
132 East 66th Street
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 10:09 AM Nancy Norton <nnorton9977@gmail.com> wrote:
I should also add the additional noise, traffic and congestion this huge ugly dark chunk of cement will attract
will NOT be welcomed. The taxpaying homeowners living access the street do NOT want this.
We would be much happier with single family homes on this property.
Nancy Norton
132 East 66th Street
Richfield, MN 55423
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:52 AM Nancy Norton <nnorton9977@gmail.com> wrote:
I live across the street and DO NOT WANT to look at this huge cement building.I DO NOT WANT to have semi-
trucks delivering and unloading product to the businesses anytime 24 hours a day 7 days a week, disturbing me. This
cement building will only provide shade to 66th street. There is no place for snow removal and not enough parking
space available. I only see NEGATIVE from this proposed mixed-use development.As a Richfield homeowner for
over 50 years living across the street on Stevens Avenue and 66th Street.
The Hub commercial buildings are 35%-45% EMPTY.Commercial buildings on Nicollet Avenue from 66th Street to
64th Street are 45%-50% EMPTY.YOU should be spending your time getting the empty commercial buildings filled
with businesses.Richfield certainly does not need more EMPTY commercial buildings.
I PROPOSE you build 4 (four) beautiful Richfield style single family homes that will enhance the area between 1st
Avenue and Stevens Avenue on 66th Street.This will enrich Richfield and will not negatively impact the long time tax
paying Richfield residents.
Again I say,ABSOLUTELY NO Mixed-Use Development at 6601 & 6605 1st Ave & 6600 & 6608 Stevens Ave.
Nancy Norton
132 East 66th Street
Richfield, MN 55423
4
Matt Brillhart
From:Nancy Norton <nnorton9977@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, April 24, 2018 11:31 AM
To:Pat Elliott; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; Maria Regan Gonzalez; John Stark; Melissa
Poehlman; Matt Brillhart; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; Simon Trautmann
Subject:NO Zoning Change for 6601 & 6605 1st Ave & 6600 & 6608 Stevens Ave
If the Planning Commission approves the zoning change to multi-use development for the parcel at Stevens Avenue and
1st Avenue South on 66th Street after receiving numerous phone calls, emails and additionally listening to 3 hours
of heartfelt opposition from longtime and new Richfield homeowners who will be directly negatively impacted by the
zoning changes it will be very clear none of you sitting on the Planning Commission or the Richfield City Council care
about the taxpaying Richfield residents.
Remember we are the citizens who pay the taxes that support your paycheck.The paycheck that allows you sit like stoic
statues with your eyes glued to monitor screens instead of looking into the eyes and faces of the Richfield taxpayers who
are speaking directly to you and who’ve elected you.
Thank You,
Nancy Norton
132 East 66th Street
5
Matt Brillhart
From:Cynthia Norton <cnorton54@comcast.net>
Sent:Friday, April 20, 2018 1:54 PM
To:Pat Elliott; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia; STrautman@RichfieldMN.gov; Maria Regan
Gonzalez; John Stark; Matt Brillhart; Melissa Poehlman
Subject:Mixed-Use Development at 6601 & 6605 1st Ave & 6600 & 6608 Stevens Ave
As a long time resident and homeowner in Richfield, I am opposed to changing the zoning on the parcel that is
across 66th St. from my residence.
I DO NOT WANT this huge cement building that will house commercial and residential.I DO NOT WANT
the noise and pollution of semi-trucks delivering and unloading product to the businesses anytime 24 hours a
day 7 days a week. I DO NOT WANT the residential single-family nature of my neighborhood changed to
become a place where families are unfamiliar and will change monthly as they move in and out.
This unattractive cement monstrosity that resembles a non-descript Soviet Union styled high-rise will block the
sunshine. 66th Street will look dark and shaded and the view will be blocked towards the southw est.
There is not enough space for snow removal. This terrible idea will only add more traffic and congestion to an
already busy crime-ridden area of 66th St and Nicollet Ave.
I see nothing positive for me from this proposed mixed-use development. As a Richfield homeowner for over
50 years I embrace the suburban feeling of single-family homes with a yard for kids to play. I do not want my
quaint suburb to feel like it is a busy noisy downtown corner.
The Hub commercial buildings are 35%-45% EMPTY.Commercial buildings on Nicollet from 66th Street to
64th Street are 45%-50% EMPTY.Spending your time getting the empty commercial buildings filled with
businesses that will provide you with the tax dollars this city needs would be time better spent by the cit y
council.Richfield does not need additional EMPTY commercial buildings.
The Dairy Queen, Best Buy, Rainbow Foods, and The Country Buffet were recent victims of robbery and
vandalism. More commercial shops closer to my home only puts me at higher risk of being robbed, raped and/or
killed in my own home.
I PROPOSE you build 4 (four) new single-family homes with a yard that will enhance the area between 1st
Avenue and Stevens Avenue on 66th Street.This will enrich Richfield. It will not negatively impact the long
time and loyal tax paying Richfield residents.
6
I am 100% against changing the zoning classification. I vote ABSOLUTELY NO to Mixed-Use Development
at 6601 & 6605 1st Ave & 6600 & 6608 Stevens Ave.
Cynthia Norton
132 East 66th Street
Richfield,MN55423
1
Matt Brillhart
From:Melissa Poehlman
Sent:Monday, May 14, 2018 1:47 PM
To:Matt Brillhart
Subject:FW: Questions RE: Mixed-Use Development between Stevens Ave and 1st Ave
Importance:High
Melissa Poehlman, AICP
Asst. Director of Community Development |City of Richfield
612.861.9766
From:Steve Devich
Sent:Monday, May 14, 2018 10:35 AM
To:Elizabeth VanHoose (bethjvanhoose@hotmail.com); John Stark
Cc:Mary Tietjen; Melissa Poehlman
Subject:FW: Questions RE: Mixed-Use Development between Stevens Ave and 1st Ave
Importance:High
I believe that this email is actually a data request that we will have to respond to in the normal fashion.Correct?
Steven L. Devich |City Manager
City of Richfield
Tel: (612) 861 -9702 |Fax: (612) 861 -9749
sdevich@richfieldmn.gov
…A great place to thrive
From:Pat Elliott
Sent:Monday, May 14, 2018 8:13 AM
To:Nancy Norton
Cc:Steve Devich
Subject:RE: Questions RE: Mixed-Use Development between Stevens Ave and 1st Ave
Good morning to both Nancy and Cynthia. In response to your questions I must confess to not being the best person
to answer them but will do my best.In regards to No.1 I'm not certain meetings between staff and developers or those
interested in commercial ventures in Richfield require minutes or other formal record keeping but will check with the City
Manager to see if I am wrong. Not being a party to the homeowners inquiries about future plans before or after Mr.
Lynch's acquisition and not having been provided the names of the Richfield members who allegedly had the information
sought I'm afraid I can't answer this question either. In regards to No. 3 I would suggest you direct this question to the
Planning Commission members.
Pat
From:Nancy Norton [nnorton9977@gmail.com]
Sent:Saturday, May 12, 2018 11:13 AM
2
To:Pat Elliott
Subject:Questions RE: Mixed-Use Development between Stevens Ave and 1st Ave
Mayor Elliott, Can you provide a response to the following questions regarding Mixed -Use Development between Stevens
Avenue and 1st Avenue:
1.How can I obtain all the minutes of the "Richfield staff meetings" with PLH & A ssociates from 2016 to the present?
2.Can you provide the reason why the homeowners that inquired about future plans of this property before and after Mr. Lynch
purchased the property were never provided any details when they contacted various Richfield members who would have
knowledge of future plans for this parcel?Why did the City wait until April 2018 to FIRST inform the homeowners directly
impacted of the zoning change yet the City has been actively working and meeting with this developer since 2015/2016? During
this same time period many homeowners inquired with the city of Richfield about the plans for this property and
unquestionably no information was provided to them
3.Why did the planning commission put the desires of a Wisconsin businessman and a non Richfield resident ahead of
the desires and wishes of the residents of Richfield?Why did the planning commission immediately approved the zoning
change to Mixed-Use Development for this property moments after listening to overwhelming opposition from the
homeowners directly impacted?
Link to RICHFIELD SUN Article:
https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_current/planning -commission-approves-change-of-comprehensive-plan-tables-decision-
on/article_fbe1a37a-53f8-11e8-ae59-3b4731908eb7.html
At the April 23 Richfield Planning Commission meeting,several residents who live between First and Stevens avenues
spoke at the public hearing against the approval of an amendment of the comprehensive plan to change a property to a
mixed-used development on 66th Street at the former Southview Baptist Church property at 101 66th St. E.
Despite an overwhelming opposition to a mixed-use development in the neighborhood of First and Stevens Avenues,
the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the change to the comprehensive plan. The
comprehensive plan for 2040 has yet to be approved and the deadline for submission to the Metropolitan Council is July
1.
The project and timing details
PLH & Associates, the builder for the project, purchased the property in August 2016 and presented its initial design
concepts to the planning commission and city council at work sessions on Aug. 23, 2016, and Nov. 20, 2016.
Paul Lynch of PLH & Associates, a real estate investment construction service and pro perty management company, said
that after he received positive feedback from the staff meetings and sessions, he purchased the property at the corner of
66th Street and First Avenue and began designing the project.
Residents’ input
During the public comment portion of the meeting,22 residents and business owners approached the stand to make
comments opposed to the project’s designation as a mixed-use property.
Thank You,
Nancy Norton
Cynthia Norton
1
Matt Brillhart
From:Mike Plantan <mike.plantan@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, May 15, 2018 9:30 PM
To:Paul Lynch
Cc:Matt Brillhart; cathyandjeffbender@earthlink.net; jml8839@comcast.net;
tluv2travl@aol.com; Michael Howard; Edwina Garcia
Subject:Re: The EMI
Attachments:neighborhood input.docx
Hi Paul,
Attached is a list of input items from the neighborhood.Please let me know if there are any questions,
comments, or concers and I look forward to discussing this further.
Thanks,
Mike
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Plantan, Mike <mike.plantan@optum.com> wrote:
Hi Paul,
Sorry for the delay, I did not have an opportunity to compile those last night.The notes are on my personal
computer, I will get those sent out this evening.
Thanks for hosting the open house.I will follow up with Ryan on the more technical questions we asked and be
sure to CC you on those emails.
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Mike Plantan | Optum
Associate Director Healthcare Economics Consultant, OptumCare
11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN 55344
O +1 952-205-1440
2
M +1 612-704-4427
mike.plantan@optum.com
www.optum.com
From:Paul Lynch [mailto:lynchp@plh-associates.com]
Sent:Tuesday, May 15, 2018 2:57 PM
To:Plantan, Mike
Cc:Matt Brillhart;cathyandjeffbender@earthlink.net;jml8839@comcast.net;tluv2travl@aol.com; Michael Howard; Paul
Lynch
Subject:RE: The EMI
Mike,
Thank you for attending last night and presenting questions and concerns from the neighborhood group.
Can you please reply back with the questions and concerns from last night?
Thank you,
Paul Lynch Jr.,Managing Member
MADISON |MINNEAPOLIS
PO BOX 390157, Minneapolis, MN 55439-0157 |608-206-7596 |www.plh-associates.com |lynchp@plh-associates.com
This email may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and delete all copies.
From:Plantan, Mike <mike.plantan@optum.com>
Sent:Monday, May 7, 2018 8:54 AM
To:Paul Lynch <lynchp@plh-associates.com>
1. The neighborhood would like a smaller development that fits with the residential character of the
neighborhood, such as 2 story townhouses with walk up entries - this would mitigate the negative
impacts to the single family neighborhood of traffic noise and safety issues, parking issues, privacy
concerns, general noise, concerns about mechanicals, etc.
- more green space and mature trees
- a building and parking areas that do not require variances to the current city zoning code
2. Neighbors would prefer a residential-only option vs mixed-use
3. Special consideration must be given to the needs of neighbors immediately adjacent to the property,
in order to preserve their well-being and the value of their properties.
4. No restaurants or high traffic volume businesses
Businesses be 9-8
Limits on delivery hours
5. More mechanical specs available in design specs
- First floor mechanical room to ensure enough space for equipment and get back additional parking
spots
6. No protruding balconies
- Juliet style balconies
7. Appropriate, and appealing barrier to neighborhood
8. Provisions for snow removal
- Bond for snow removal if being provided by city to ensure continued maintenance
9. Wrap lower parking lot to exit into parking from underground
10. Break away barriers on Stevens exit
- Rumble strip in parking lot or other cut through prevention measure
11. Underground parking exit set back from 66th
12. revised plans showing items that we have been told are being included but never seen in
documentation, including traffic control signage, “porkchop” cut out, security plans, and tenant
guidelines.
AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED
ORDINANCES
AGENDA ITEM #9.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 104
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jennifer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: Jay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hief of P olice
6/6/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of the second reading of an ordinance amending the tobacco ordinance to include
increasing the minimum legal age to purchase tobacco products and tobacco related devices from
eighteen (18) to twenty-one (21) years of age and updating several sections to include new and
updated definitions and adopt a resolution for summary publication of the Ordinance.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Tobacco 21, a movement aimed at raising the minimum legal age for tobacc o and nicotine sales age to 21 has
seen rec ent succ ess in Minnesota and nationwide. A work session occ urred on Marc h 27, 2018, with the
Advisory Board of Health, related to increasing the tobacc o sales age from 18 to 21 y ears. The presentation
highlighted the benefits of a Tobacco 21 policy and the protections it provides for younger tobacco users.
I n addition to raising the legal age to purchase tobacco products from 18 to 21 and adopting findings to
support that c hange, the proposed ordinance updates and incorporates new definitions in order to stay
compliant with state law and current with new products on the market. The proposed ordinanc e also eliminates
"purchase, use, and possession" penalties against under-age individuals as studies indic ate that such
penalties are not effective in preventing tobacco use by young people.
To date, nine communities in Minnesota have passed tobac co 21 laws. Those communities are Edina, St.
Louis Park, Bloomington, Plymouth, North Mankato, Shoreview, Falcon Heights, Minneapolis and St. Peter.
The first reading of this ordinance amendment was approved by the City Council on May 22, 2018.
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the second reading of an ordinance amending the tobacco ordinance to include
increasing the minimum legal age to purchase tobacco products and tobacco-related devices from 18
to 21 and adopt a resolution for summary publication of the Ordinance.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
The Richfield Advisory Board of Health has a strong track record of supporting policies that
protect the health of its community from the harms of tobacco. The tobacco ordinance has been
amended in the past to keep up with the constant flow of new products released into the market.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
A formal public hearing is not required, but the City Council could allow public comment on the
proposed ordinance changes.
City code states that it is a violation for any person to sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco
product, tobacco-related device, or electronic cigarette to any person under the age of 18 years.
The City currently has 22 licensed establishments selling tobacco products.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
N/A
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
N/A
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
The City Attorney has reviewed the ordinance and approves of its content.
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
The Council may decide not to approve the second reading of the ordinance and direct staff how to
proceed.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Proponents and opponents of the Tobacco 21 initiative, including community members and business owners.
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
Ordinance Ordinance
Resolution Resolution L etter
1
BILL NO. _________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1146 OF THE CITY CODE
PERTAINING TO TOBACCO SALES AND THE
REGULATION OF SMOKING
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Subsection 840.13 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
No person may use tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices,
electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products, as these items are
defined in section 1146 of this Code, or electronic cigarettes on City-owned parks,
conservation areas, open spaces, or recreational facilities, including without limitation:
trails within parks used for walking and biking, picnic shelters, athletic fields, and play
areas. This subsection does not apply to the use of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-
related devices, electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products or
electronic cigarettes inside motor vehicles parked on the premises of City-owned parks,
conservation areas, open spaces or recreational facilities.
Sec. 2. Subsection 1146.01 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.01. – Findings and Purpose.
The Richfield City Council recognizes that many persons under the age of 18 years
purchase or otherwise obtain, possess, and use tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-
related devices, and electronic cigarettes, and that such sales, possession, and use
are violations of both State and Federal laws. Studies have shown that most smokers
begin smoking before they reach the age of 18 years and that those persons have
been shown to have several serious health problems which subsequently place a
financial burden on all levels of government. This section is intended to regulate the
sale, possession, and use of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco -related devices, and
electronic cigarettes, for the purpose of enforcing and furthering existing laws, to
protect minors against the serious effects associated with the illegal use of tobacco,
tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, and electronic cigarettes, and to further
the official public policy of the State of Minnesota in regard to preventing young people
from starting to smoke as stated in Minn. Stat. 144.391.
Subdivision 1. The Richfield City Council makes the following Findings in
support of this section intended to regulate the sale, possession, and use of tobacco
and related devices and products and to protect young people against the serious
effects associated with the use of tobacco and related devices and products:
(a) The City Council recognizes that the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related
devices, electronic delivery devices, and nicotine or lobelia delivery products
to persons under the age of 18 violates both state and federal laws;
2
(b) Studies, which the city hereby accepts and adopts, have shown that 95% of
smokers initiate use before the age of 21; and that almost no one starts
smoking after age 25;
(c) Tobacco use has been shown to be the cause of several serious health
problems which subsequently place a financial burden on all levels of
government;
(d) Raising the legal purchasing age to 21 will take legal purchasers out of the
social circles of underage users and studies have concluded that raising the
legal purchasing age for tobacco to 21 would result in a 12 percent decrease
in tobacco use and approximately 223,000 fewer premature deaths for those
born between 2000 and 2009;
(e) Raising the legal purchasing age to 21 is in line with the minimum age to buy
alcohol and simplifies ID checks for retailers;
(f) There is evidence to suggest that enforcement of possession, use, or
purchase (PUP) laws against youth detract from the enforcement of penalties
against retailers and that youth of color in Minnesota are disproportionately
over-represented in similar status-level offenses, increasing their interactions
with law enforcement and the juvenile justice systems;
(g) Enforcement of PUP laws has not been shown to reduce youth smoking
significantly and because PUP laws do not sufficiently take into account the
tobacco industry’s responsibility for targeting youth with its marketing
practices, this section is intended to regulate the sale of tobacco, tobacco-
related devices, electronic delivery devices, and nicotine or lobelia delivery
products for the purpose of enforcing and furthering existing laws, to protect
minors and young adults against the serious effects associated with use and
initiation, and to further the official public policy of the state in regard to
preventing young people from starting to smoke as stated in Minn. Stat. §
144.391, as it may be amended from time to time.
Subd. 2. Studies. In making these findings, the City Council accepts the
conclusions and recommendations of: the Institute of Medicine’s report, “Public Health
Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products” (2015),
the U.S. Surgeon General reports, “E-cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults”
(2016), “The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress” (2014) and
“Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults” (2012); the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention in their studies, “Tobacco Use Among Middle and High
School Students — United States, 2011– 2015,” and “Selected Cigarette Smoking
Initiation and Quitting Behaviors Among High School Students, United States, 1997”;
and of the following scholars in these scientific journals: Xin Xu et al., Annual
Healthcare Spending Attributable to Cigarette Smoking: An Update, Am. J. Prev. Med.
48(3): 326-33 (Mar. 2015); Giovino GA, “Epidemiology of Tobacco Use in the United
States,” Oncogene (2002) 21, 7326-40; Khuder SA, et al., “Age at Smoking Onset and
3
its Effect on Smoking Cessation,” Addictive Behavior 24(5):673-7, September-October
1999; D’Avanzo B, et al., “Age at Starting Smoking and Number of Cigarettes Smoked,”
Annals of Epidemiology 4(6):455-59, November 1994; Chen, J & Millar, WJ, “Age of
Smoking Initiation: Implications for Quitting,” Health Reports 9(4):39-46, Spring 1998;
Everett SA, et al., “Initiation of Cigarette Smoking and Subsequent Smoking Behavior
Among U.S. High School Students,” Preventive Medicine, 29(5):327-33, November
1999, copies of which are adopted by reference; Wakefield, M & Giovino, G “Teen
Penalties for Tobacco Possession, Use, and Purchase: Evidence and Issues,” Tobacco
Control (2003) 12, i6 – i13; the Minnesota Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee’s report,
“2016 Annual report to Governor Mark Dayton and the Minnesota State Legislature
(2016).
Sec. 3. Subsection 1146.03 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.03. – Definitions.
Subdivision 1. For the purposes of this section, the terms defined in this
subsection have the following meanings given them:
Subd. 2. Tobacco or tobacco products. “Tobacco” means Any substance or item
containing tobacco leaf, including but not limited to cigarettes, and any product
containing, made, or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption,
whether chewed, smoked, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested
by any other means, or any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product
including but not limited to; cigars; pipe tobacco; snuff, fine cut or other chewing
tobacco, cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready-rubbed, and
other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; flowers, cavendish; shorts, plug and twist
tobaccos; fine cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; dipping tobaccos; refuse
scraps, clippings, cuttings, and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of
tobacco leaf prepared in such manner as to be suitable for chewing, sniffing or
smoking. This term excludes any tobacco product that has been approved by the
United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco-cessation product,
as a tobacco-dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is being
marketed and sold solely for such an approved purpose.
Subd. 3. Tobacco-related devices. "Tobacco-related devices" shall mean any
tobacco product as well as a pipes, cigarette rolling papers, or other devices
intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing,
sniffing, or smoking, or inhalation of vapors of tobacco or tobacco products. Tobacco-
related devices include components of tobacco-related devices which may be
marketed or sold separately.
Subd. 4. Tobacco-Related Product. Any tobacco, tobacco-related device,
electronic delivery device, or nicotine or lobelia delivery product, as those terms are
defined in this section.
4
Subd. 4 5. Self-service merchandising. "Self-service merchandising" shall mean
open displays of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic
delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes, in any manner
where any person has access to the tobacco, tobacco products tobacco-related
devices, or electronic cigarettes, such items without the assistance or intervention of
the licensee or the licensee's employee. The assistance or intervention entails the
actual physical exchange of the tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or
electronic delivery device, or nicotine or lobelia delivery product cigarettes, between
the customer and the licensee or employee. Self-service merchandising shall not
include vending machines.
Subd. 5 6. Vending machine. "Vending machine" shall mean any mechanical,
electric or electronic, or other type of device which dispenses tobacco, tobacco
products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia
delivery products cigarettes, upon the insertion of money, tokens, or other form of
payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase such items. the
tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or electronic cigarettes.
Subd. 6 7. Loosies. "Loosies" shall mean the common term used to refer to a
single or individually-packaged cigarette.
Subd. 7. Minor. "Minor" shall mean any person who has not yet reached the age
of 18 years.
Subd. 8. Retail establishment. "Retail establishment" shall mean any place of
business where tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic
delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes, are available for
sale to the general public. Retail establishments shall include, but not be limited to,
grocery stores, convenience stores, and restaurants.
Subd. 9. Moveable place of business. "Moveable place of business" shall mean
motorized vehicles, mobile sales kiosks, kiosks, trailers or other structure or
equipment not permanently attached to the ground.
Subd. 10. Sale. A "sale" shall mean any transfer of goods for money, trade,
barter, or other consideration.
Subd. 11. Compliance checks. "Compliance checks" shall mean the system the
City of Richfield uses to investigate and ensure that those authorized to sell tobacco,
tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, and electronic delivery devices, and
nicotine and lobelia delivery products cigarettes, are following and complying with the
requirements of this section. Compliance checks shall involve the use of minors
persons under the age of 21 as authorized by this section to attempt to purchase such
items. tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, and electronic cigarettes,
for educational, research and training purposes as authorized by State and Federal
laws. Compliance checks may also be conducted by other units of government for
educational, research and training purposes or for the purpose of enforcing
5
appropriate Federal, State or local laws and regulations relating to tobacco, tobacco
products, tobacco-related devices, and electronic delivery devices, and nicotine and
lobelia delivery products. cigarettes.
Subd. 12. Electronic cigarette Delivery Device. "Electronic cigarette delivery
device" shall mean any electronic-smoking device product or electronic device that
can be used to deliver nicotine, lobelia or any other substances to the person inhaling
from the device. The term shall include such devices whether they are manufactured,
marketed, or sold as electronic delivery devices cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic
pipes, vape pens, mods, tank systems, or under any other product name or descriptor
and includes any component part of such a product whether or not sold separately.
This term excludes any product that has been approved by the United States Food
and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, as a tobacco
dependence product, or for other medical purposes, and is being marketed and sold
solely for such an approved purpose
Subd. 13. Cigar. A "cigar" shall mean any roll of tobacco that is wrapped in
tobacco leaf or in any substance containing tobacco, with or without a tip or
mouthpiece, that is not a cigarette as defined in Minn. Stat. § 297F.01, subdivision 3
as amended from time to time.
Subd. 14. Smoking. "Smoking" shall mean inhaling or exhaling from, or carrying,
any lighted or heated tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco-related device or any other
lighted or heated product, whether natural, synthetic, containing, made or derived from
nicotine, tobacco marijuana or other plant. Smoking also includes the inhaling or
exhaling of vapor from any electronic delivery device or nicotine or lobelia delivery
product cigarette, as well as carrying an electronic delivery such device or product
cigarette that is turned on or otherwise activated.
. . .
Subd. 18. Sampling. "Sampling" shall mean the lighting of tobacco, tobacco
products, tobacco-related devices or the activation of and inhaling of vapor from
electronic delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes in a retail
establishment by a customer or potential customer for the purpose of sampling the
product or device before a purchase.
Subd.19. Nicotine or Lobelia Delivery Product. Any product containing or
delivering nicotine or lobelia intended for human consumption, or any part of such a
product, that is not tobacco or an electronic delivery device as defined in this section.
Nicotine or Lobelia Delivery Product does not include any product that has been
approved or otherwise verified for legal sale by the United States Food and Drug
Administration for tobacco use cessation or for other medical purposes, and is being
marketed and sold solely for that approved purpose.
6
Sec. 4. Subsection 1146.05 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.05. – Sale and distribution of tobacco.
Subdivision 1. License required. No person or establishment shall sell or offer to
sell any tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic cigarettes
delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products without first having obtained a
license to do so from the City of Richfield. All licenses issued under this section shall
be valid only on the premises for which the license was issued and only for the person
to whom the license was issued. No transfer of any license to another location or
person shall be valid
Subd. 2. Application. An application for a license to sell tobacco, tobacco
products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia
delivery products cigarettes shall be made on a form provided by the Public Safety
Director or the Public Safety Director's designee. The fee shall accompany the
application. The application shall be reviewed and action taken on it by either the
Public Safety Director or the Director's designee.
Subd. 3. Action. The Public Safety Director or the Public Safety Director's
designee may either approve or deny the license, or may delay action for such
reasonable period of time as necessary to complete any investigation of the
application or the applicant it deems necessary. If the Public Safety Director or the
Public Safety Director's designee denies the license, notice of the denial shall be
given to the applicant along with notice of the applicant's right to appeal the decision.
Subd. 4. License term. All licenses shall expire on December 31 of the year in
which the license is issued. The annual license fee will not be prorated.
Subd. 5. Denial, revocation or suspension. A license under this section may be
denied, suspended or revoked by the council, after an investigation and public hearing
where the licensee is granted the opportunity to be heard, for one (1) or more of the
following reasons:
(a) The operation of the business is in conflict with any provision of this code.
(b) The operation of the business is in conflict with any health, fire, building,
building maintenance, zoning, or any other applicable codes or laws.
(c) The applicant or licensee has failed to comply with one (1) or more provisions
of this section or any statute, rule or ordinance pertaining to the sale of
tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related device, or electronic delivery
devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products. cigarettes.
(d) The applicant has committed fraud, misrepresentation or bribery in securing or
renewing a license.
(e) The owner of the premises licensed or to be licensed would not qualify for a
license under the terms of this section.
(f) The applicant is under the age of 18 21 years.
7
(g) The applicant has been convicted within the past five (5) years of any violation
of a Federal, State, or local law ordinance provision, or other regulation
relating to tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic
delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products. cigarettes.
(h) The applicant has had a license to sell tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-
related devices, or electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia delivery
products cigarettes, revoked within the 12 months preceding the date of
application.
(i) The applicant is prohibited by Federal, State, or other local law, ordinance, or
other regulation, from holding such a license.
. . .
Sec. 5. Subsection 1146.09 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.09. – Prohibitions.
Subdivision 1. Prohibited Sales. It shall be a violation of this section for any person to
sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or electronic
delivery device or nicotine or lobelia delivery product cigarettes:
(a) To any person under the age of 18 21 years.
(i) Age verification. Licensees must verify by means of government-issued
photographic identification that the purchaser is at least 21 years of age.
Verification is not required for a person over the age of 30. That the person
appeared to be 30 years of age or older does not constitute a defense to a
violation of this subsection.
(ii) Signage. Notice of the legal sales age and age verification requirement must
be posted at each location where licensed products are offered for sale. The
required signage, which will be provided to the licensee by the city, must be
posted in a manner that is clearly visible to anyone who is or is considering
making a purchase.
(b) By anyone under the age of 18 years.
(c) By means of any type of vending machine.
(d) By means of self-service merchandising.
(e) By means of loosies.
8
(f) Containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, strychnos, cocaine,
marijuana, or other deleterious, hallucinogenic, toxic, or controlled substances except
nicotine and other substances found naturally in tobacco or added as part of an
otherwise lawful manufacturing process.
(g) By any other means prohibited by Federal, State, or other local law, ordinance
provision, or other regulation.
Subd. 2. Child-Resistant Packaging. The sale of any liquid, whether or not such
liquid contains nicotine, that is intended for human consumption and used in an
electronic delivery device or nicotine or lobelia delivery product cigarette or that is not
contained in child-resistant packaging, is prohibited. All licensees under this Section
must ensure that any such liquid is sold in child-resistant packaging, as defined in
Minn. Stat. § 461.20, as amended from time to time.
Subd. 3. Cigar Sales. No person shall sell, offer for sale, or otherwise distribute
cigars in original packages containing three (3) or fewer cigars for a sale price, after
any coupons, multipack or buy-one-get-one promotions, or any other discounts are
applied and prior to applicable sales taxes being imposed, of less than two dollars and
sixty cents ($2.60) per cigar contained within. In addition, no person shall sell, offer for
sale, or otherwise distribute cigars in original packages of four (4) or more cigars for a
sale price, after any coupons, multipack or buy-one-get-one promotions, or any other
discounts are applied and prior to applicable sales taxes being imposed, of less than
ten dollars and forty cents ($10.40) per package. This subdivision does not apply to
premium cigars as defined in Minn. Stat. § 297F.01, subdivision 13a. This subdivision
shall become effective January 1, 2016.
Subd. 4. Smoking and Sampling Prohibited.
(a) Smoking shall be prohibited, and no person shall smoke, in a public place, at a
public meeting, or in a place of employment. This subdivision also prohibits the
sampling of tobacco, tobacco products, electronic delivery devices, nicotine or
lobelia delivery products cigarettes and products used in electronic delivery
devices and nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes.
A licensee under this Section that allowed s sampling at its licensed premises on
or before October 23, 2014 the effective date of this ordinance may continue to allow
sampling, but only while that certain licensee operates at that certain licensed
premises.
Subd. 5. Smoking permitted. Except sampling, which is expressly prohibited
under subd. 4, smoking is permitted as identifyed in Minn. Stat. § 144.4167.
9
Sec. 6. Subsection 1146.11 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.11. – Vending machines.
It shall be unlawful for any person licensed under this section to allow the sale
of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic delivery devices
or nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes, by the means of a vending machine.
Sec. 7. Subsection 1146.13 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.13. – Self-service sales.
It shall be unlawful for a licensee under this section to allow the sale of tobacco,
tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic delivery devices or nicotine or
lobelia delivery products cigarettes, by any means whereby the customer may have
access to such items without having to request the item from the licensee or the
licensee's employee and whereby there is not a physical exchange of the item
tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or electronic cigarettes, between
the licensee or licensee's employee and the customer. All tobacco, tobacco products,
tobacco-related devices, and electronic delivery devices and nicotine or lobelia
delivery products cigarettes, shall either be stored behind a counter or other area not
freely accessible to customers. Any retailer selling tobacco, tobacco products,
tobacco-related devices, or electronic cigarettes, at the time this section is amended
shall comply with this section within 30 days of the passage of the amendments. A
license holder who operates an establishment or fully enclosed portion of an
establishment that sells at least 90 percent of its products in tobacco, or tobacco
products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia
delivery products cigarettes, is exempt from the self-service merchandising provision if
the license holder prohibits anyone under 18 21 years of age from entering the
establishment or fully enclosed portion of an establishment and the license holder
conspicuously displays a notice prohibiting persons under 18 21 years of age from
entering the establishment.
Sec. 8. Subsection 1146.15 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.15. – Responsibility.
All licensees under this section shall be responsible for the actions of their
employees in regard to the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related
devices, or electronic delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products
cigarettes on the licensed premises, and the sale of such an item by an employee
shall be considered a sale by the license holder. Nothing in this section shall be
construed as prohibiting the City from also subjecting the employee to whatever
penalties are appropriate under this section, State or Federal law, or other applicable
law or regulation.
10
Sec. 9. Subsection 1146.17 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.17. – Compliance checks and inspections.
All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by Richfield law enforcement
or other authorized City officials during regular business hours. From time to time, but
at least twice per year, the City shall conduct compliance checks. One check will be
conducted by engaging, with the written consent of their parents or guardians, minors
a person over the age of 15 years, but less than 17 years of age, to enter the licensed
premise to attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices,
or electronic delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes. A
second check will be conducted by engaging a person over the age of 18 but less than
21 years of age, to enter the licensed premise to attempt to purchase such items.
Minors Persons used for the purpose of compliance checks shall be supervised by the
Public Safety Director or the Public Safety Director's designee. Minors used for
compliance checks shall not be guilty of the unlawful purchase or attempted purchase,
nor the unlawful possession of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or
electronic cigarettes, when such items are obtained or attempted to be obtained as a
part of the compliance check. No minor person used in compliance checks shall
attempt to use a false identification misrepresenting the minor's person’s age and all
minors persons lawfully engaged in a compliance check shall answer all questions
about the minor's person’s age, asked by the licensee or licensee's employee and
shall produce any identification, if any exists, for which the minor person is asked.
Nothing in this subdivision shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by State or
Federal laws for educational, research, or training purposes, or required for the
enforcement of a particular State or Federal law.
Sec. 10. Subsection 1146.19 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.19. – Other illegal acts.
Subdivision 1. Unless otherwise provided, the following acts shall be a violation
of this section.
Subd. 2. Illegal sales. It shall be a violation of this section for any person to sell or
otherwise provide any tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or
electronic delivery devices or nicotine or lobelia delivery products cigarettes, to any
minor person under the age of 21.
Subd. 3. Illegal possession. It shall be a violation of this section for any minor to
have in their possession any tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or
electronic cigarettes. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in a
compliance check.
11
Subd. 4. Illegal use. It shall be a violation of this section for any minor to smoke,
chew, sniff, or otherwise use any tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device, or
electronic cigarettes.
Subd. 5. Illegal procurement. It shall be a violation of this section for any minor to
purchase or attempt to purchase or otherwise obtain any tobacco, tobacco products,
tobacco-related devices, or electronic cigarettes, and it shall be a violation of this
section for any person to purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a
minor. It shall further be a violation for any person to coerce or attempt to coerce a
minor to illegally purchase or otherwise obtain or use any tobacco, tobacco product,
tobacco-related device, or electronic cigarettes. This subdivision shall not apply to
minors lawfully involved in a compliance check.
Subd. 6 3. Use of false identification. It shall be a violation of this section for any
minor person under the age of 21 to attempt to disguise their true age by the use of a
false form of identification, whether the identification is that of another person or one
on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered with to represent an
age older than the actual age of the person.
Sec. 11. Subsection 1146.23 of the Richfield City Code is amended by deleting
the following subdivision 3 relating to penalties:
1146.23. – Penalties.
Subd. 3. Minors. Minors found in unlawful possession of, or who unlawfully
purchase or attempt to purchase, tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices,
or electronic cigarettes, shall be given the option of participating in a diversion
program rather than paying the violation fine.
Sec. 12. Subsection 1146.25 of the Richfield City Code is amended as follows:
1146.25. – Exceptions and defenses.
Subdivision 1. Nothing in this ordinance section shall prevent the provision of
tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco-related devices, or electronic delivery devices
cigarettes, or nicotine or lobelia delivery products to a minor person under the age of
21 as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural ceremony.
Subd. 2. It shall be an affirmative defense to the violation of this section for a
person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by State law.
Subd. 3. It shall be a defense to a violation of the section that a licensee did not
intentionally aid, advise, hire, counsel or conspire with another to sell tobacco, tobacco
products, tobacco-related devices, electronic delivery devices, or nicotine or lobelia
delivery products to minors persons under the age of 21 or otherwise procure the sale
of tobacco such items to minors persons under the age of 21.
12
Sec. 13. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the
City Charter.
Adopted this ____ of ________, 2018.
By: ___________________________
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF
AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO TOBACCO SALES
AND THE REGULATION OF SMOKING
WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above-referenced ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the ordinance is cumbersome, and the expense
of publication of the complete text is not justified; and
WHEREAS, the following summary clearly informs the public of the intent and
effect of the ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication:
SUMMARY PUBLICATION
BILL NO. 2018- ______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1146 OF THE
CITY CODE PERTAINING TO TOBACCO SALES
AND THE REGULATION OF SMOKING
On June 12, 2018, the Richfield City Council adopted an ordinance designated
as Bill No. _________, the title of which is stated above. This summary of the
ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. The
purpose of the Ordinance is to: 1) increase the minimum legal age to purchase
tobacco, tobacco products and tobacco devices from 18 to 21 and adopt findings
supporting the change; 2) update definitions in order to stay compliant with state law
and current with new tobacco products on the market; 3) eliminate “purchase, use,
and possession” penalties against under-age individuals.
Copies of the ordinance are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office
during normal business hours or upon request by calling 612-861-9738.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of
June, 2018.
Pat Elliott, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk
AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS
AGENDA ITEM #10.
STAFF RE P ORT NO. 105
CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING
6/12/2018
RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Jack B roz, Transportation E ngineer
D E PA RTME NT D IRE C TO R RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector
6/5/2018
O THE R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A
C ITY MA NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager
6/6/2018
I T E M F O R C O UNC IL C O NS ID E RAT I O N:
Consideration of approval of the preliminary design layout of Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction Plan
from 66th Street to 76th Street as recommended by the Transportation Commission.
E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY:
Jack Broz, Transportation Engineer, will give a short presentation on the following process and
design features.
Proce ss
The Transportation Commission recommended the preliminary layout for the Reconstruction of Lyndale
Avenue for City Council approval at the May 16, 2018 meeting. The recommended Preliminary Layout of
Lyndale Avenue ("Lyndale") was developed through many Transportation Commission meetings, four public
open houses, multiple business meetings, and technical analysis. Many concerns were identified for
pedestrians, bicyclists, parking, and vehicles along the corridor. Through the process the preliminary design
was developed to address the corridor issues. The design's effectiveness and impacts were reviewed and
modifications to the design were made to limit impacts. The preliminary layout is intended to improve the
conditions for each of the modes as described below.
Project Description
Pedestrians - Concerns were identified related to discomfort and safety when crossing and walking along the
corridor. The preliminary layout includes:
Medians to provide refuge and one-way crossing of traffic to improve crossings
Boulevards/trees for buffer to a new sidewalk along the east side of Lyndale
Boulevards/trees to buffer a new shared path on the west side of Lyndale
Bicyclists - Concerns were identified due to the lack of facilities for bicyclists. The preliminary layout
includes:
Bicycle cycle track from 66th Street to 67th Street
On-street buffered bicycle lanes from 67th Street to 70th Street
On-street bicycle lanes from 70th Street to 76th Street
Parking - Concerns were identified related to a lack of parking in the commercial areas as well as the
residential areas with alley access. The preliminary layout includes:
On-street parking on the east side of Lyndale north of 67th Street
On-street parking near the businesses on the west side from 75th Street to south of 76th
Street
On-street parking near the residents on the east side from 72nd Street to 74th Street
Motorists - Concerns were identified with safety and mobility along the corridor. Safety concerns included
above average crash and injury rates. I n addition, the existing speeds make it uncomfortable and potentially
dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists. Mobility concerns included crossings and the delays at the signals
at 77th and 76th Streets. The preliminary design features include:
66th Street to 70th Street
Two lane roadway with center median
Compact roundabouts at 67th, 68th and 70th Streets
Lake Shore Drive "right-in/right-out" access
70th Street to 76th Street
Three lane roadway with left turn lanes and medians at intersections
Traffic signal at 73rd Street
Close access to Augsburg Avenue
I mpacts - The existing right-of-way for Lyndale varies along the corridor from 66 feet to approximately 100
feet. The preliminary design generally fits within the existing right-of-way, but there are impacts at some
adjacent properties as described below:
Sidewalk easements at the compact roundabouts
Easements and retaining walls at the compact roundabouts along Wood Lake Nature Center
Temporary grading easements along Wood Lake Nature Center to adjust to the new design
Temporary grading easements and/or short retaining walls to adjust adjacent properties to the new
design
Driveway easements to adjust driveways to the new design
Additional Considerations - The commission has also recommended that the following items be considered in
the detail design of the project:
Replacement of the fence along the W oodlake Nature Center with an aesthetically pleasing fence
Consideration of an additional bicycle route along Oak Grove Boulevard/Aldrich Avenue for families to
avoid the commercial district driveways
Further study of the proposed southbound right turn lane length to 76th Street (potentially minimize)
RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N:
By motion: Approve the preliminary design layout for the Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction Project from
66th Street to 76th Street as recommended by the Transportation Commission.
B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT I O N:
A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON T E X T
Lyndale Avenue is one of the oldest corridors in the community. Originally, Highway 65 crossed
the state along this corridor. The major traffic was shifted to I nterstate 35W and Lyndale remains
a major corridor connecting Richfield residents to the commercial area at 66th Street, Wood Lake
Nature Center, Richfield High School and the History Center. Lyndale also is a significant
gateway to the community with access to both I nterstate 494 and the Crosstown Highway.
Currently, the physical condition of the roadway and underground utilities are past their service
life and require reconstruction.
B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc):
The reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue is consistent with the following approved plans:
5 Year Street Reconstruction Plan
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 6 - Transportation)
Bicycle Master Plan
Street Reconstruction Guiding Principles Document
Complete Streets Policy
Arterial Roads Study
The City Council approved the preliminary design contract for Lyndale at the August 8, 2017 City
Council Meeting.
C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G IS S U E S:
The preliminary design needs to be approved in order to complete final design for a 2019
construction timeline.
D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T:
The estimated cost of the project is $10,000,000. The costs includes the replacement of city
utilities. The project is financed by:
Street Reconstruction Bonds: $9,500,000
Municipal State Aid: $450,000
Xcel Rate Payer Fees: $50,000
E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION:
None
ALTE R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D ATIO N(S):
Council may choose to not approve the preliminary design and direct staff on how to proceed.
P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S E X P E C TE D AT ME E TIN G:
Residents impacted by the project
AT TAC H ME N T S:
D escription Type
L ayout S ection #1 E xhibit
L ayout S ection #2 E xhibit
Open House #1 S ummary E xhibit
Open House #2 S ummary E xhibit
Open House #3 S ummary E xhibit
Open House #4 S ummary E xhibit
P erformance Measures and D esign Recommendations E xhibit
RICHFIELD
LIQUOR
CHIPOTLE
SARPINO'S
SPRINT
NOODLES AND
COMPANY
POTBELLY
STARBUCKS PEOPLE
READY
LABOR
READY
BP
BARRET
LAWN
CARE
GROCERIES
OF THE
ORIENT BROADWAY
PIZZA
SUPERAMERICA
RICHFIELD
TRANSMISSION
CENTER
GENTLEMAN'S
CHOICE HAIR
REPLACEMENT
AUDIO
PERFECTION
FOUR
POINTS
HOTEL
FRANKLIN
SQUARE
APARTMENTS
TUSHIE
MONTGOMERY
& ASSOCIATES
WEIS
BUILDERS
AVINITY
MAINSTREET
VILLAGE
RETIREMENT
JOY'S
PATTAYA
THAI DAIRY
QUEEN
LYNWOOD COMMONS APARTMENTS
15779
849.93
CSWM
15802
849.39
TRBS
15803
849.33
TRBS
15804
849.18
TRBS
15805
849.07
TRBS
15815
849.33
TRDT 11
15816
849.37
TRDT 10
15854
847.54
WEMT
15910
847.34
HYWM
15911
847.37
PLLP
15912
847.93
BNCH
15913
848.13
PLLP
E 15914
847.25
MHEL
15915
847.08
TFSP
E 15916
846.84
MHELSIG15917
847.07
TFSC
E 15918
846.90
MHEL
E 15919
846.97
MHEL
15920
848.11
PLLP
15979
848.42
TRDT 15 /MULCH AROUND
15980
848.40
TRDT 13 /MULCH AROUND
16030
848.35
CSWM
H16033
847.67
HHCM
16052
848.93
TRDT 14
16071
848.35
PLLP
16109
848.63
TRDT 9 / MULCH
16110
848.24
TRBS
16111
848.23
TRBS
16112
848.12
TRBS
16113
848.23
TRBS
16114
848.13
TRBS
16115
848.00
TRBS
16116
848.20
TRBS
16117
848.26
TRBS
16118
848.48
TRBS
16119
848.36
TRBS
16121
849.29
TRDT 2 / ROCKS N FLOWERS
16122
849.14
TRBS16123
849.07
TRBS
16124
849.28
TRBS
16125
849.00
TRBS
16126
849.19
TRBS
H 16128
847.98
HHCM
16138
848.50
CSWM
16139
848.67
CSWM
16140
848.94
CSWM
16153
847.93
HYWM
16157
848.10
PLLP
16185
848.51
TRBS
16186
848.68
TRBS
16187
848.69
TRBS
16224
848.73
TRDT 15 /DIRT
16234
848.47
CSWM
16271
848.37
PLLP
16291
848.75
TRDT 14 /MULCH
16292
848.75
TRDT 12 /MULCH
16336
848.77
TRDT 8 /MULCH
16337
848.59
TRDT 11 /MULCH
16338
847.81
PLLP
16375
848.42
TRDT 2 /3
16376
848.13
TRDT 2 /5
16377
848.00
TRDT 14
H 16423
848.25
HHFO16424
847.97
PLLP
16468
847.53
CSWM
5006
848.81
VFCP /IP
5010
849.94
VFCP /IP
5011
848.45
VFCP /IP
5012
848.13
VFCP /IP
5014
848.04
VFCP /IP
5015
847.47
VFCP /MAG
5016
846.83
VFCP /MAG
5222
849.30
VFCP /SPIKE
5227
848.53
LMFR /PROP PIN 5-8IN RBR
5235
847.74
VFCP /MAG NAIL ON BIT
5236
848.92
VFCP /TEMP X ON BIT
5244
846.88
VFCP /X ON CONC 5245
850.65
VFBM TNH
5251
850.50
VFBM /TNH SE QUAD 74TH-LYNDALE
5259
848.90
VFCP /TEMP X ON CONC
5266
850.45
VFBM /SE COR HC RAMP AT 7400
5267
850.44
VFBM /TNH
5273
848.17
VFCP /TEMP
5274
851.06
VFBM
U15044
847.47
MHOT /TELE
15055
846.36
PMTL
15056
846.50
PMTL
15057
846.78
PMTH
15058
846.84
PMTH PMRT U15159
846.73
MHOT /MNDT
15190
846.30
PMRT
E 15291
847.29
MHEL
15292
847.17
TFSP
15294
847.43
PLLP
15295
847.71
BNCH
C 15332
846.99
MHCMC15333
847.00
MHCMCO15343
846.67
COSN
15344
847.19
WEMT
15405
846.80
GRAT TRDT 3
E 15424
847.55
MHELY15425
847.36
PLLD
15426
846.89
TFSP
E 15431
846.98
MHEL
E 15462
847.19
MHEL
15486
848.89
TRDT 13
15487
849.18
TRBS
15488
849.17
TRBS
15489
849.20
TRBS
15490
849.23
TRBS15491
849.65
TRBS15492
849.79
TRBS15493
849.90
TRBS15494
849.90
TRBS15495
849.91
TRBS
15498
847.33
TFSP
15564
849.40
TRDT 14 / MULCH AROUND
15565
849.12
TRDT 13 / MULCH AROUND
15566
848.61
TRDT 11 / MULCH AROUND
23147
851.11
TRSP /LARGE ROOT
23213
850.94
TRCT 16
23214
852.31
TRDT 50
23215
852.68
TRDT 18
23235
849.30
CSWM G23332
849.37
TRDT 26
23333
849.45
TRDT 4
23334
849.32
TRDT 4
23335
849.54
TRDT 4
23392
849.56
TRSP /14INF23428
849.37
MKFOC23429
849.42
MHCM /VAULT
23437
849.91
TRDT 20
23438
850.26
TRDT 24
23439
850.50
CSWM
23444
850.63
TRDT 24
23445
849.89
TRDT 24
23463
850.12
TRDT 24
23481
849.27
TRDT /CLUSTER
23494
849.35
PLLP TFSG /71ST-LYNDALE AVE. NO-PARKING
23507
849.06
TRSP /12IN
23508
849.77
TRBS /4.0 DIA
23513
848.04
TRCT 22
23514
848.03
TRDT 6
23515
847.94
TRDT 12
23516
847.92
TRDT 10
23567
849.18
TRDT 8
23568
849.31
TRDT 8
23569
849.30
TRDT 10
23622
848.53
TRDT 18
23623
848.98
TRDT 18
23629
848.48
CSWM
23630
847.86
TRBS /4.0 DIA
23644
848.27
TRBS /6.0 DIA
23645
848.20
TRDT 12
23646
847.92
TRDT 12
23647
848.36
TRDT 18
23667
848.29
TRCT 14
23668
847.81
TRDT 6
23680
849.55
TRDT 20
23720
848.77
HYWM
23725
849.57
TRSP /14IN
23726
849.62
TRCT 10
23727
850.78
TRDT 2423728
849.77
TRSP /12IN
23729
849.47
TRCT 16G23748
848.78
MKNG
23756
850.62
TRCT 10
H 23784
848.42
HHELG23809
848.71
MKNG
E 23833
848.29
MHEL
23834
848.55
PLLP TFSG /NO-PARKING BUS-STOP
23836
849.08
TRCT 14
23843
847.88
TRDT 8
23844
847.87
TRDT 6
23845
848.18
TRDT 16
23846
848.22
TRDT 1623847
848.45
TRSP /12IN
H 23856
848.25
HHEL
23883
847.63
TRBS /3.0DIA23884
847.51
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23885
847.52
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23886
847.70
TRBS /3.0DIA
23889
847.42
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY23890
847.37
TRBS /3.0DIA
23891
847.29
TRBS /3.0DIA
23892
847.39
TRBS /3.0DIA
23893
847.40
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY23894
847.41
TRDT 1223895
846.96
TRBS /3.0DIA
23896
847.26
TRDT 15
23897
847.08
TRBS /3.0DIA
23898
847.09
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23899
847.18
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23900
847.02
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23901
846.98
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY
23902
847.11
TRBS /3.0DIA23903
847.50
TRSP /18IN
23904
847.18
TRDT 3 /3IN SPECIALTY23905
846.95
TRDT /3IN SPECIALTY23906
847.36
TRDT 1223907
848.19
TRDT 12
23925
846.64
TRDT 1823945
846.67
TRDT 4
23946
847.19
TRDT 28
24011
851.22
TRDT 30
24110
847.18
TRDT 24
24111
846.39
TRDT 26
24112
846.89
TRDT 24
24113
847.92
PLLP TFSG /SCHOOL XING
24128
847.94
CSWM 24164
851.19
TRDT 14 24165
851.22
TRDT 16
24178
849.29
TRDT 26
24179
848.67
TRDT 30
24180
848.27
TRDT 30
24244
847.92
CSWM
24245
847.89
TRDT 22
24246
848.24
TRCT 12
24270
847.64
TRDT 32
24271
847.89
TRDT 32
24272
847.82
TRDT 26
24279
847.87
VFCP /IP
24286
848.05
TRDT 16
24351
847.29
PLLP
24380
847.44
MBOX24388
847.37
TRCT 4
24389
847.49
TRCT 4
24390
847.49
CSWM
24398
847.42
PLLP
24427
847.57
TRDT 8
24428
847.65
TRDT 30
24451
847.76
TRDT 24
24495
846.94
HYWM UGWM B
24498
846.75
TFSP
24525
847.53
TRDT 5
24526
847.56
TRDT 5
24527
847.64
TRDT 6
24528
847.57
TRDT 1024529
847.44
TRDT 48
24530
847.44
TRSP 24
24579
847.49
TRDT 30
24617
847.86
PLLD
24620
847.74
TRDT 30
24630
847.95
TRDT 24
24631
847.92
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24632
847.77
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24633
847.56
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24634
847.24
TRBS /3.0 DIA24635
847.45
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24643
847.58
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24644
847.62
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24645
847.56
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24646
847.51
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24647
847.44
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24648
847.50
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24649
847.21
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24650
847.16
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24651
846.96
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24652
847.35
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24653
847.24
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24654
847.15
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24655
847.36
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24656
847.29
TRBS /4.0 DIA
24657
847.39
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24658
847.70
TRBS /3.0 DIA
24664
847.58
TRDT 14
24665
847.38
TRDT 4 /X4
F24666
847.40
MKFOC24667
847.49
MHCM UGFO1 B /VAULTH24668
847.29
HHEL
24669
847.14
TFSP PEDB TFSG
C 24688
846.50
MHCMSIG24705
852.20
SIGB
24763
847.45
TRCT 18
24764
847.40
TRDT 12
24765
847.30
TRCT 12
24766
847.53
TRCT 14
24767
847.73
TRCT 14
C 24772
846.86
MHCM UGFO
24797
847.68
TRDT 30 24798
846.84
TFSP
H 24799
846.83
HHEL
H 24824
847.08
HHELH24852
846.66
HHEL
24859
847.46
TFSPG24877
847.21
MKNG
24894
846.57
BNCH
24907
847.89
TRDT 16
24963
847.54
TRDT 424977
848.00
TRDT 8
24978
847.61
PLLP
24989
847.66
TRDT 12
24990
847.70
TRDT 12
25016
847.34
TRDT 625039
847.91
CSWM
25043
848.39
TRDT 14
25163
848.26
TRDT 425190
848.78
TRDT 8
25196
848.98
TRDT 22
H 25203
847.82
HHEL
25288
848.89
FLAG25289
848.76
FLAG
25290
848.86
TRDT 5
25300
847.90
PLLP
25310
849.03
TRDT 36
25311
848.81
TRDT 20
25330
848.86
MBOX
25362
849.53
TRDT 8IN X3
25368
848.76
TRDT 10
25369
848.88
TRDT 12
25399
848.54
TRCT 14
25400
848.46
TRCT 12
25448
847.99
TRDT 4G25497
846.83
MKNG
C 25510
846.37
MHCM
25598
847.30
HYWMG25633
847.27
MKNG
25707
846.87
PLLP TFSG /BUS-STOP NO-PARKING
25719
847.95
TRDT 24
25720
848.58
TRDT 22 25721
848.88
TRDT 18
25722
849.37
TRDT 30
25723
848.60
TRCT 12
25724
847.88
TRDT 18
C25744
845.62
MHCM /FIBER VAULT
25772
848.21
TRDT 3
25778
848.66
TRCT 24
25838
848.26
TRCT 6
25951
847.68
TRDT 10
25988
846.60
TRDT 12
25989
846.68
TRDT 12
25990
846.76
TRDT 12
25991
846.42
TRDT 12
25992
847.36
TRDT 12
25993
847.74
TRDT 6
25994
847.56
TRDT 6
25995
847.59
TRDT 4
26003
847.16
PLLP
26004
847.91
TRDT 1026154
847.65
PLLP
26157
847.43
HYWM
26168
848.23
TRDT 36
26179
848.72
TRDT 36
26191
846.94
TRDT 8IN
26192
846.96
TRDT 14IN
26216
848.59
TRDT 8IN
26308
848.10
TRDT 26IN
H 26479
847.96
HHEL
26499
847.88
PLLP
26500
847.52
CSWM
26560
849.11
FLAG
26578
848.10
CSWM
H 26579
848.09
HHEL ?
26605
847.81
CSWM
26670
849.53
TRCT 12
26690
847.51
HYWM
26743
849.50
TRBS 2.0
26744
849.34
TRBS 2.0
26745
849.26
TRBS 2.0
26746
849.33
TRBS 2.0
26747
849.42
TRBS 2.0
26748
849.41
TRBS 2.0
26749
849.38
TRBS 2.0
26750
849.27
TRBS 2.0
26751
849.20
TRBS 2.0
26752
849.29
TRBS 2.0
5017
850.26
VFCP /HYD
5018
850.95
VFCP /HYD
5023
848.00
VFCP /SCRIBE X X X X >>>>>>>>
>>>>17776
849.77
BLDS
17777
849.35
BLDS
17778
849.08
PMHC17786
849.07
TRDT 15 17787
850.14
TRDT 15
17788
848.93
TRBS
17789
849.27
TRBS
17790
849.22
TRBS
17791
849.50
TRBS
17792
849.63
TRBS
17793
849.84
TRBS
17794
850.08
TRBS
17795
850.30
TRBS
17796
850.10
TRBS
17797
850.10
TRBS
17798
850.08
TRBS
17799
850.00
TRBS
17800
850.09
TRBS
17801
850.00
TRBS
17802
850.23
TRBS
17822
849.52
TRBS /IN MULCH
17823
849.65
TRBS /IN MULCH
17824
849.69
TRBS /IN MULCH
17825
849.82
TRBS /IN MULCH
17826
849.56
TRBS /IN MULCH17827
849.54
TRBS /IN MULCH17828
849.82
TRBS /IN MULCH17829
850.20
TRBS /IN MULCH17830
850.11
TRBS /IN MULCH17831
850.05
TRBS /IN MULCH17832
850.16
TRBS /IN MULCH
17841
850.31
TRBS
17842
850.01
TRBS
17843
849.98
TRBS Y17875
850.27
PLLD Y17877
850.25
PLLD
17942
850.00
PMHC
17948
850.72
BLAS
17978
850.51
TRDT 4
17979
850.36
TRDT 4
17980
850.30
TRDT 4
17981
849.66
TRDT 9
17982
849.65
TRDT 26
17983
849.71
TRDT 7
17984
849.69
TRDT 12
17985
849.82
TRDT 21
18081
848.33
PLLP
18082
849.36
FUEL
18085
849.23
FUEL18161
849.62
TRCT 2
M18162
849.32
MTNG
18216
849.12
FUEL
18217
849.09
FUEL
16120
848.87
TRDT 15 /DIRT
H24494
847.11
HHEL
11777
846.35
TRDT 20
11778
846.80
TRDT 20W11905
845.18
MHWM M11978
845.70
MTNG
18278
845.68
PMHC
18281
846.38
TRBS
18282
846.43
TRBS
18330
848.17
BLDS
18348
846.44
TRDT 5 M18359
846.42
MTEL OHEL B
C
X X X X X X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>METRO
PAWN
& GUN
JAMAR WEST
APARTMENTS
DEAN
BJORKSTRAND
LANDSCAPING
7400 LYNDALE
BUSINESSES
WOODLAWN
TERRACE
FEETSCALE
25 500
LYNDALE AVE S W 74TH STW 76TH STW 75TH STW 72ND STW 71ST STALDRICH AVE S
GARFIELD AVE S
GARFIELD AVE S
LYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTYFEETSCALE
25 500 W 76TH STW 74TH STW 73RD STW 73RD STALDRICH AVE S
LYNDALE AVE S
BRYANT AVE S
BRYANT AVE S
OAK GROVE BLVD
HARRIET AVE S
PEDESTRIAN FLASHING
BEACON CROSSING
CLOSE
CLOSE
CLOSEW 77TH STW 77TH ST
OAK GROVE
LUTHERAN
CHURCH
LYNDALE
FIELD
RICHFIELD HISTORY
CENTER AND
MUSEUM
VFW
GRAMERCY PARK
COOPERATIVE
CITY BELLA
VILLAS
LAKE SHORE
DRIVE
FAIRCHILD
MADDOX &
LEONIDAS
CITY BELLA
WOODLAKE
CHIROPRACTIC
MCD
O
N
A
L
D
S
BMO HARRIS
BANK
WOOD LAKE
NATURE CENTER
LYNDALE
FIELD
5029
849.59
VFCP
5030
849.98
VFCP
5031
852.97
VFCP / HYD
5032
853.45
VFCP / HYD
5033
850.26
LMFM
5034
852.43
VFCP /HYD
5003
848.38
VFCP /IP
5004
850.38
VFCP /IP
5008
847.07
VFCP /IP
5009
850.20
VFCP /IP
5050
849.60
VFCP /IP
5200
852.05
VFBM /TNH 70TH-LYNDALE
5201
849.91
VFCP /SPIKE
5202
851.06
VFCP /SPIKE
5204
852.18
VFBM /TNH
5206
851.11
VFCP /SPIKE
5209
850.83
LMFR /5-8IN
5210
852.31
LMFR /5-8IN
5218
851.42
LMFR /.25IN
5221
851.59
VFBM /TNH NE-QUAD 71 ST-AUGSBURG AVE
5268
849.46
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
5269
849.06
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
5275
846.39
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
5279
846.79
VFCP /TEMP SPIKE
H 10055
848.97
HHTF
H10060
848.24
HHCM
10128
849.46
PLLP
10129
849.80
TRDT 6
10130
849.25
TRDT 6
10131
849.36
TRDT 6
10132
849.42
TRDT 6
10133
849.28
TRDT 6
IVB
10134
849.33
IRCV
10139
849.10
PLLP
10140
849.31
TRDT 6
H
10162
848.82
HHTF
H
10188
848.00
HHTF
10239
848.53
PLLP
10240
848.50
PLLP
H
10241
848.42
HHTF
10247
848.64
TRDT 8
10248
848.38
TRDT 6
10249
848.34
PLLP
10263
847.94
LMFX
10266
849.55
LMFM
10290
849.68
TRDT 4
10291
849.78
PLLP
10292
849.64
TRDT 4
10293
849.80
TRDT 4
10294
849.72
PLLP
V
10312
849.78
VNPI
V 10313
849.77
VNPI
10321
849.73
TRDT 6
10322
849.64
TRDT 4
10323
849.77
TRDT 6 10324
849.80
PLLP
TRASH10341
849.35
TRSH
10344
849.56
TRDT 6
10345
849.58
HYWM
10346
852.83
VFBM /TNH 10347
848.87
BNCH
Y
10363
849.61
PLLD Y
10364
849.52
PLLD
H10389 849.45HHEL10390
849.57
PLLP
10394
849.73
BLDSF22032
848.03
MKFO UGFO
22054
848.24
TFSP PEDB22067
848.22
HYWM
22075
847.32
PLLP
H 22114
848.44
HHTF
22115
848.54
TFSP PEDB
22147
848.51
BNCH
22162
848.61
TFSP PEDB TFSG /CROSS WALK - BUS STOP
22164
848.71
TRSP /10IN
22165
848.76
TRSP /10IN
G22175
848.52
MKNG
22176
848.63
TRDT 18
H 22178
848.15
HHEL
22199
848.70
TFSP PEDB
E 22200
848.69
PDEL
H 22201
849.17
HHEL
H 22271
848.76
HHEL UGEL B
22313
848.94
PLLP TFSG UGEL1 B /NO PARKING
22332
849.28
IRSH
22346
850.94
TRDT 24
22348
850.46
TRDT 36
22370
848.63
TRDT
H 22385
849.18
HHEL UGEL
22437
849.26
PLLP TFSG /35MPH NO- PARK BUS STOP
22441
849.57
TRBS 22453
849.25
TRDT 24
U
22472
847.66
MHOT /VAULT
22476
849.59
HYWM
C 22477
849.46
PDCM
22478
849.60
TRBS /6.0 DIA
C 22508
849.51
PDCM UGFO E
IVB
22580
850.54
IRCVIVB
22581
850.59
IRCV
22602
849.97
BLDS / STORM DRAIN FOR DOWN SPOUT 6IN CLAY
22640
851.40
TRCT 8 /18IN DIA
22641
850.78
TRDT 8 /10IN DIA
22647
850.38
TRDT 6
22705
850.39
BLSP
22733
851.30
TRDT 8 /CLUSTER
22734
851.19
TRSP /6IN
22765
851.62
TRDT 24
22766
851.25
TRDT 1822767
850.50
PLLP TFSG /NO PARKING
G22834
850.10
MKNG
G22894
850.19
MKNG
22896
848.96
TRDT 20
22897
850.69
TRDT 24
22957
852.07
TRSP /20IN
22965
850.98
CSWM
23003
852.13
TRDT 10
23030
851.95
TRDT /18IN
23067
851.09
TRDT 18
23068
851.14
TRDT /16IN
23069
851.03
TRDT 22
23147
851.11
TRSP /LARGE ROOT
G23161
849.16
MKNG
23182
848.74
HYWM
23183
851.59
TRCT 5 /12 IN DIA TRUNK
23184
850.75
TRCT 8 /8IN
23185
850.80
TRCT 8 /6IN23186
850.97
TRCT 6 /8IN
23187
850.95
TRCT 6 /6IN
23188
851.03
MBOX /CRANK SHAFT IN CONC
23193
851.72
TRSP /12IN
23202
851.93
TRDT 18
23203
851.93
TRDT 26
23204
852.35
TRSP /24IN
23205
852.10
TRSP /26IN
23206
852.49
TRDT 20
23207
852.73
TRDT 8
23208
852.91
TRDT 4
23215
852.68
TRDT 18
23223
850.21
TRDT 30
23231
849.75
TRDT 6
23232
849.09
TRDT 3
23245
848.69
PLLP
23251
848.72
CSWM
23310
849.10
MKNG
26435
849.51
TRDT 16IN
26442
850.37
TRDT 4
26443
850.54
TRDT 24
26444
849.80
TRDT 4
26445
849.76
TRDT 4
26460
848.02
TRDT 6
26768
847.42
PLLP
26835
846.65
PLLP
26862
851.70
TRDT 30
26863
851.18
TRDT 30
C
26891
846.38
MHCM /VAULTF26892
845.95
MKFO
26894
846.24
TRDT 4
26906
847.80
TRDT 5
26908
847.62
TRDT 4
26935
847.90
TRDT 36
26987
845.45
HYWM
27026
846.01
PLLP
27073
847.17
TRDT 14 27101
847.04
TRDT 16
27147
845.65
PLLP
27198
844.98
PLLP
27306
847.52
TRCT 16
27308
847.51
TRCT 3
27340
844.89
TRDT 5
27396
845.72
PLLP
27480
845.50
HYWM
C
27498
845.50
MHCM UGFO B /FIBER DUCTE
27500
845.46
MHEL UGEL /DUCT
27524
847.09
TRDT 40IN
5025
849.82
LMFX
5026
850.10
LMFM
16497
846.67
CSWM UGWM E
E
16546
850.09
MHEL
16547
850.11
CSWM
16548
850.20
PLLP
16549
850.06
CSWM
H
16550
850.39
HHEL
H
16551
850.47
HHCM
16553
850.29
CSWM
16554
850.29
CSWM
16555
849.99
CSWM
16556
849.49
PLLP
16710
850.02
TRBS16711
850.22
TRBS
16712
849.84
TRBS16713
849.71
TRBS
16714
850.11
TRBS
16728
852.78
TRDT 12
16803
851.27
TRCT 11
16804
851.08
TRBS
16808
851.18
TRDT 12 16816
850.78
TRDT 2-8
16837
850.16
PLLP
16838
850.22
TFSP
E
16839
850.20
MHEL
16841
850.42
PLLP
16843
850.44
PLLP
16844
851.31
TRDT 15
16848
850.63
HYWM
16849
850.39
PLLP
16851
849.59
TRDT 15 16852
848.55
TRDT 14
16853
848.95
TRDT 1216859
850.20
PLLP
16860
849.59
PLLP
16862
850.06
HYWM
H 16870
849.75
HHFO UGFO B
E 16872
849.38
MHEL UGEL B
16880
847.84
PLLP
16924
849.45
TRED
H 17067
850.40
HHTF
E
17068
850.68
MHEL
17069
850.64
TFSP
M
17104
851.08
MTELTRAN17105
851.09
ETRN
H
17140
850.08
HHEL
17141
849.83
TFSP
17142
849.93
TRBS / MULCH
17143
850.19
TRBS / MULCH
17144
850.12
TRBS / MULCH
17145
850.10
TRBS / MULCH
17146
850.03
TRBS / MULCH 17164
850.87
TRDT 15
17177
850.23
PLLP
17178
850.93
TRDT 13
17179
850.89
TRDT 10
17180
850.71
TRDT 12 17181
849.75
PLLP
17226
849.92
TRBS / ROCK
17238
850.41
TRBS
17239
850.31
TRBS
17240
850.66
TRBS
17241
850.66
TRBS
17242
850.00
TRBS
17243
849.82
TRBS
17244
849.80
TRBS
17245
849.76
TRBS
17246
849.91
TRBS
17247
849.55
TRBS
17248
849.69
TRBS
17249
850.11
TRBS
17250
850.45
TRBS
17251
850.30
TRBS
17252
850.24
TRBS
17275
850.13
TFSP
E 17284
849.59
MHEL
E 17285
849.67
MHEL
17288
849.75
PLLP
17308
850.56
TRDT 10
17309
850.52
TRDT 10
17310
850.68
TRDT 9
17311
850.76
TRDT 10
17358
850.17
TRDT 5
17391
850.28
PLLP
CBRC B
R=848.31
I=S 844.97I=I=I=I=I=
17417
850.01
HYWM
E17419 849.92MHEL17420
850.56
TRDT 12
17488
849.86
BLDS
17489
849.79
BLDS17493
850.31
TRDT 4
17494
850.31
TRDT 3
17497
850.29
TRDT 3
17498
850.24
TRDT 4
17502
850.24
TRDT 3
17503
850.13
TRDT 4
17504
849.50
PLLP 17506
849.98
TRDT 317507
849.94
TRDT 3
17574
849.58
TRDT 13
17579
849.50
PLLP
17589
849.75
TRBS
17590
849.70
TRBS
17591
849.85
TRBS
17592
849.80
TRBS
17593
849.65
TRBS
17594
849.60
TRBS
17595
849.58
TRBS
17596
849.64
TRBS
17597
849.54
TRBS
17598
849.61
TRBS17599
849.60
TRBS
17600
849.65
TRBS
17601
849.62
TRBS
17602
849.54
TRBS
17603
849.56
TRBS
17604
849.57
TRBS
17633
849.16
PLLP
17675
850.06
TRBS
17676
849.87
TRBS
17677
849.98
TRBS
17678
850.02
TRBS
17679
849.96
TRBS
17680
849.78
TRBS
17681
849.86
TRBS
17682
849.66
TRBS
17683
849.69
TRBS
17684
849.58
TRBS
17685
849.45
TRBS
17686
849.53
TRBS
17706
848.99
TRDT 1417712
849.78
TRBS
17713
849.90
TRBS
17714
849.67
TRBS
17715
849.78
TRBS
17716
849.64
TRBS
17717
849.49
TRBS
17718
849.66
TRBS
17719
849.61
TRBS
17720
849.68
TRBS
17721
849.64
TRBS
17722
849.43
TRBS
17723
849.60
TRBS17724
849.63
TRBS17725
849.65
TRBS
17726
849.68
TRBS
17727
849.67
TRBS
17728
850.09
TRBS
17729
849.88
TRBS
17730
849.85
TRBS
17731
849.87
TRBS
17732
849.89
TRBS
17733
849.83
TRBS
>>>>>>>>X11025
850.75
TRDT 9 11026
849.72
PLLPM11076
851.31
MTNG CBRC
R=849.74
I=S
W 846.48
846.54
I=I=I=I=I=
11095
851.03
TRDT 9
11106
851.02
PLLPTRAN11303
833.38
ETRN UGEL B /3.3X5.2M11324
832.57
MTNG UGNG E
11412
837.57
TRDT 4111418
842.93
CSWM
11419
834.31
TRDT 40
11420
835.23
TRDT 39
11421
833.27
TRDT 45
11453
844.74
TRDT 42
11591
851.97
IRSH
11653
851.16
TRDT 26
11708
850.97
TRDT 4
11728
852.00
TRBS
11729
851.66
TRBS11730
852.13
TRBS
11731
852.04
TRBS
11732
852.23
TRBS11733
852.36
TRBS
11734
852.37
TRBS11735
852.40
TRBS
11736
851.92
TRBS11737
851.71
TRBS11738
851.82
TRBS11739
851.89
TRBS
11740
852.03
TRBS11741
851.99
TRBS
11742
852.15
TRBS
11743
852.09
TRBS
11744
851.98
TRBS
11745
852.17
TRDT 14
11746
852.08
TRBS
11747
852.18
TRBS
11749
852.00
TRDT 15
11750
851.64
TRBS
>XXXXXCCXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X XXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5051
846.05
VFCP /TEMP MAG
5052
832.00
VFCP /MAG
5053
831.54
VFCP /SPIKE
5054
834.00
VFCP /SPIKE
5055
828.78
VFCP /SPIKE
5056
838.36
VFCP /SPIKE
5057
843.03
VFCP /SPIKE
5058
830.97
VFCP /SPIKE
5059
834.19
LMFR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>STRUCTURAL WALL (< 5')
LANDSCAPING WALL (< 2')
LANDSCAPING WALL (< 2')
STRUCTURAL WALL (< 8')LANDSCAPING WALL (< 2')5 PARKING STALLSLYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTYFEETSCALE
25 500
LYNDA
L
E
A
V
E
S
LYNDA
L
E
A
V
E
SW 71ST STW 70TH STW 69TH STW 68TH STW 67TH STW 66TH STAUGSBURG AVE S
GARFIELD AVE S
GARFIEL
D
A
V
E
S LAKESHORE DRIVE SLYNDALE AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTYFEETSCALE
25 500
OAK GROVE BLVD
HARRIET AVE S
CLOSE
PEDESTRIAN FLASHING
BEACON CROSSING
\\metrosouth4\h\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2017-10-25 Open House\2017-10-25 Open House Summary
revised.docx
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
October 25, 2017 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Wood Lake Nature Center
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to share the purpose of the Lyndale Avenue reconstruction project,
project goals and objectives, project history, and solicit public input. This open house was geared toward
building a common understanding of current conditions, opportunities, and potential impacts in the
corridor and project area.
Staff Attendees:
BOLTON & MENK – Tim Lamkin, Sarah Rippke Lloyd, Haila Maze, Zachary Parsons.
CITY OF RICHFIELD – Jeff Pearson, Jack Broz, Kristin Asher, Liz Finnegan, Logan Vlasaty
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS – Wesley Dunser, Phil Chillman, Ken Severson, Gary Ness
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately fifty (50) interested participants who attended the open house to review the
materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included
Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, and community context
Two large layouts of the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss and provide comments
Surveys and comment cards to solicit input from participants
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through surveys and comment cards. The
following summarizes the most frequently mentioned themes in the public comments collected:
Safe and improved pedestrian facilities, particularly sidewalks and crossings (19 mentions)
Safe and dedicated bike lanes on corridor, with connections to other facilities (13 mentions,
though 4 opposed)
Address speeding, including via traffic calming (5 mentions)
Maintain existing trees and green space (4 mentions)
Improve signal at 73rd Street (4 mentions)
Convert the road from 4 to 3 lanes (3 mentions, though 2 opposed)
\\metrosouth4\h\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2017-10-25 Open House\2017-10-25 Open House Summary
revised.docx
Safer pedestrian and auto access for apartments and businesses at southern end of corridor,
particularly Lyndale Commons (3 mentions)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Traffic
Safety/Distracted
Driving
Traffic Congestion Traffic Speeds Signal Timing or
Location
Pavement
Condition
Lane Width Presence of
Parking on the
Corridor
Other
Traffic-Related Concerns Along the Corridor Today
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Pedestrian
Safety and
Accessibility
Bicycle Safety
and Accessibility
Transit Safety
and Accessibility
Corridor
Appearance
Impact on
Adjacent Uses
Other Concerns About the Corridor Today
16
7
16 16
9
4
14
6
18
5 7
28
22
1 0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Walk Transit Bicycle Auto Truck
How is the Corridor Used
R:\Projects\Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction\Public Involvement\Open House 2 material\2017-11-29 Open House Summary.docx
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
November 29, 2017 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Wood Lake Nature Center
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to reflect back feedback received to date, present a draft problem
statement and goals, provide information on the corridor's existing issues, and educate on safety tools
design elements that will address the corridor's issues. Feedback was collected on whether the process
has been responsive to feedback to date, and whether the safety tool and design elements would be
preferred on the corridor.
Staff Attendees
BOLTON & MENK
Tim Lamkin, Sarah Rippke Lloyd, Haila Maze, Zachary Parsons
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Jeff Pearson, Jack Broz, Kristin Asher, Liz Finnegan, Logan Vlasaty
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS
Ken Severson, Jeffrey Walz, Gary Ness, Jack Wold, Sean Heyford-Oleary, Art Felgate
RICHFIELD CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Maria Regan Gonzalez
Meeting Notification
The following notifications were done regarding the November 26 Open House:
Approximately 900 mailers were sent to residents within proximity of the project, advertising
both open houses.
An ad in the Sun Current paper was printed in the November 23, 2017 publication.
An ad on Facebook was promoted from November 22 – November 29, targeted towards those
in Richfield.
Multiple Facebook posts were created on both the City Facebook page as well as the Sweet
Streets Facebook page.
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately sixty (60) interested participants who attended the open house to review the
materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included
Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, community context, problem statement, work done to date, and feedback summary
Series of boards with information on specific design elements and safety tools
Large layout of the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss and provide comments
Surveys and comment cards to solicit input from participants
R:\Projects\Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction\Public Involvement\Open House 2 material\2017-11-29 Open House Summary.docx
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through surveys and comment cards. The
following summarizes public comments collected:
Address ways to accommodate bicycles safety, and make connections to other facilities;
difference of opinion if needed on Lyndale
Pedestrian and business access improvements south of 74th
Need better pedestrian facilities – sidewalks and crosswalks
Difference of opinion on need for on-street parking
0
5
10
15
20
25
What We've
Learned
Addressing the
Problem
Speed/Conflict
Point Reduction
Bicycle Facilities Parking
Survey Questions: Support For Concepts
Yes No Not Sure
0
5
10
15
20
25
3 Lane Section Access Control Roundabout Compact
Roundabout
Raised Median RRFB
Number Saying "Yes" to Concept
South Middle North
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-02-20 Open House
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
February 20, 2018 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Oak Grove Lutheran Church
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to review what has been done to date to respond to community
feedback and complete supporting technical analysis, and to provide input on potential design concepts
for the corridor and for key intersections.
Staff Attendees:
BOLTON & MENK – Tim Lamkin, Sarah Lloyd, Zachary Parsons
CITY OF RICHFIELD – Jeff Pearson, Jack Broz, Logan Vlasaty
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS – Ken Severson, Paul Chillman, Jack Wold
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately ninety (90) interested participants who attended the open house to review
the materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included:
Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, community context, problem statement, work done to date, feedback summary, and
evaluation process
Boards outlining the different roadway, intersection, and bicycle alternatives
Series of boards with information on specific design elements and safety tools
Large layout of the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss and provide comments
Surveys and comment cards to solicit input from participants
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-02-20 Open House
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through surveys and comment cards. In
total, there were 65 comment cards and surveys submitted. The following summarizes public comments
collected:
76th Street to 74th Street
Concept 1: Many supported this concept – those that commented opposing the concept seem
to dislike 3-lane concept.
Concept 2: Many supported the compact roundabout with median— Concern with business/
driveway access if a median would be installed
Concept 3: Decent support for the 4 lane concept—but many disliked it and did not see it as a
change to what is there already.
70th Street
Most people preferred the roundabout. There was an overall pedestrian crossing safety concern.
Concept 1: Most people preferred the compact roundabout as it would continue to move school
traffic and reduce backups. The only worry here was pedestrian crossing safety.
Concept 2: Most who supported this option requested faster signal times and generally said yes
to this because they did not like the concept of a roundabout.
Lakeshore Drive to 67th Street
Concept 1: People tended to support the compact roundabout concept more frequently than
the signal. The main concerns were driveway access if a median were to be installed and safety
crossing the intersection.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Have the common themes
from previous open houses
been accurately captured?
Do you agree that the
problem statement captured
the overall concerns of the
community?
Does the evaluation process
help find solutions important
to the community?
Would you support an
alternative that impacts
adjacent property if needed
to successfully address the
existing problems?
Baseline Survey Questions
Yes No Not Sure
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-02-20 Open House
Concept 2: People who supported this generally did so because they did not prefer
roundabouts.
Bicycle Facilities
People liked the cycle track and moving the route to Aldrich the best.
Concept 1 Traditional Bike Lane: many thought this option is unsafe and hazardous to drivers
and bikers
Concept 2 Buffered Bike Lane: People who liked this option liked how it was out of the way a bit,
and that the area would be plowed in the winter
Concept 3 Cycle Track: Most preferred option
Concept 4 Move Route: Many people preferred this option as well, but people who preferred it
also answered with the “No need/desire” when asked if they bike on Lyndale.
Parking
The concept of adding spaces was generally well received. Concerns were right of way issues, losing
trees, and “not needing” it.
Concept 1 Pocket: People liked pocket parking
Concept 2 Parallel: People were neutral on this one.
Concept 3 Back In: Either they loved it or hated it. The main concern was the actual task of
backing into a spot. They said that is not only difficult, but would hold up traffic.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Yes (Regularly)
Yes (Occasionally)
No (No
need/desire)No (I feel unsafe)
Do you bike on Lyndale Ave?
Do you bike on Lyndale Ave?
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-05-01 Open House
Lyndale Avenue Reconstruction
City of Richfield
Open House Summary
May 1, 2018 – 4:00 to 7:00 PM
Oak Grove Lutheran Church
Purpose:
The purpose of this open house was to provide the public an opportunity to review and comment on the
recommended alternative for the corridor, prior to final approval by the City of Richfield.
Staff Attendees:
BOLTON & MENK – Tim Lamkin, Sarah Lloyd, Zachary Parsons
CITY OF RICHFIELD –Jack Broz, Logan Vlasaty, Liz Finnegan
RICHFIELD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEMBERS – Ken Severson, Wesley Dunser
Richfield Public Attendees:
There were approximately seventy (70) interested participants who attended the open house to review
the materials and provide comments.
Materials Presented:
The material was set in a format allowing attendees the opportunity to view and visit with project staff
at their leisure. Materials included:
• Several boards with information on project overview, goals and objectives, related plans and
policies, community context, problem statement, work done to date, feedback summary, and
evaluation process
• Series of boards with information on specific design elements and safety tools
• Series of boards on traffic impacts of different intersection alternatives
• Large layout of the recommended alternative for the corridor, with the opportunity to discuss
and provide comments
• One page handout summarizing project status
• Comment cards to solicit input from participants
H:\RICH\T16114541\1_Corres\A_Meetings\Public Engagement\2018-05-01 Open House
Comments Received:
Public input was collected through discussions with staff and through comment cards. In total, there
were 12 comment cards submitted. The following summarizes public comments collected:
• Generally positive response to recommended alternative, including improved bicycle and
pedestrian crossings and safety
• Some remaining concerns about the safety of using roundabouts on this street
• Need to adequate turn restrictions and signalization to protect bicycles and pedestrians, with a
few specific suggestions
• Specifics related to impacts of construction on individual properties, and how this should be
addressed
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
Improve Pedestrian Experience
Bike Lanes, Trail/Sidewalk, Green Space, and On-street Parking
Corridor
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
3-lane Section
Reduces excessive speeding.
Speed study show’s 40% of traffic
speeds along Lyndale Ave during the core hours of the day.
Proven to Reduce Crashes
Half of the intersections have injury crash rates 3 times the state average.
Lakeshore Dr & Lyndale Ave is 12 times the state average.
Narrows Roadway Footprint to allow for other Features
Common theme from all open houses was to add bikin g, green space and
parking throughout the corridor.
Corridor
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
77th St. to 76th St.
Add dedicated turn lanes and reduce to one
thru lane approaching 76th St.
Add bike lanes and eight on-street parallel
parking stalls along Kensington property.
Parking need at Kensington property.
Consistency throughout the corridor.
76th St. to 74th St.
Add a raised median at 76th St and 75th St and consolidate entrances at 75th St.
Add pedestrian flashing system to south side of 75th St. Intersection.
Reduces conflicts points, which reduces number and severity of crashes.
Provides refuge and shorter crossing for pedestrian and bicycle along and across the
corridor.
Features Considered, but not recommended
Eliminating right turn lanes at 77th St and 76th St. Traffic would likely back up past 75th St
to the north and 77th St to the south during morning and afternoon commutes.
Roundabout at 75th St. Initially reviewed in conjunction with a center median to 76th St.
But even without the median, the impacts to the properties at 75th St and impacts to
business access was greater than the benefits of a roundabout at this location.
Four lane undivided roadway. This option was reviewed in the case that driveways
could not be consolidated. That is not the case and this option does not meet any of the
project goals.
South Business Area: 77th St – 74th St
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
74th St Intersection
Add a raised median
Reduces conflicts points, which reduces
number and severity of crashes.
Provides refuge for pedestrian and bicycle
crossing.
73rd St. to 72nd St.
Add Pocket Parking & Bus Pull-out
Common theme from open house to provide bus pull out.
Provide parking for residents short alley-only driveways.
73rd St. Intersection
Replace Signal
Provides better access to
Lyndale Ave during peak hours.
Existing Signal.
72nd St. Intersection
Provide for School Bus Traffic.
Heavily used intersection by Richfield
School.
Augsburg Ave Intersection
Close Access to Lyndale Ave.
Reduces conflicts points, which reduces
number and severity of crashes.
Oak Grove Blvd Intersection
Realign Intersection.
Reduces speeds of turning vehicles
Reduces potential cut-thru traffic.
Improves sight lines
Features Considered, but not recommended
Roundabout and 73rd St. One of the trade-offs with a 3-lane section is that turning and
crossing traffic onto Lyndale Ave may experience increased delay. There were also
significant property impacts to the four corner properties at 73 rd St.
Residential Area - 74th St – 70th St
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Close Access to Oak Grove Blvd from Lyndale Ave. Policy is that the entire
neighborhood would need to agree and request the closure, which is not the case at this
time.
Design Recommendations
70th St Intersection
Compact Roundabout
Reduces vehicular speeds.
Reduces conflict points
70th St to 69th St
Narrowed Section with Buffered Bike Lanes
Reduces impacts to Wood Lake area.
Left turn not needed, but adds space for bike lane
Maintains adequate space for maintenance and emergency vehicles.
69th St to 68th St
Narrowed Section with Median & Buffered Bike Lanes
Reduces impacts to Wood Lake area.
Residents have access through alley.
Adds space for bike lane and maintains adequate space for main tenance.
Features Considered, but not recommended
Boulevard along Wood Lake area. Impacts to Wood Lake were considered too great to
include a green boulevard in this area. There will be a narrow 2 -ft paved boulevard,
which will allow minimal snow storage. The trail is also buffered from traffic by the bike
lane.
Shifting the entire section to the east. Impacts were too great to residential properties
with other options available.
Two-way center left turn lane between 69th St and 68th St. The additional space the left
turn lane would impact the residential properties and/or Wood Lake. These impacts
Wood Lake Area - 70th St – 68th St
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
were considered too great with other options available. This was a common theme at
previous open houses. Residents in this area have alley access to their properties.
Current as of:
June 4, 2018
Design Recommendations
68th St Intersection
Compact Roundabout
Reduces vehicular speeds.
Reduces conflict points
Provides U-turn access for residents
Lakeshore Dr. Intersection
Right In/Out Access
Pedestrian flashing system
Reduces conflict points. Injury crash
rate is 12 times the state average.
Median will help slow vehicular traffic
and provide refuge for pedestrian and
bicycle crossings
68th St to 67th St
Buffered Bike Lanes
Adds space for bike lane and
maintains adequate space for
maintenance.
67th St Intersection
Compact Roundabout
Reduces vehicular speeds.
Reduces conflict points
Provides U-turn access to
Lakeshore Dr.
Features Considered, but not recommended
One-way stop, tee intersection at 68th St. Residents on the west side between 68th st and 67th St
do not have an alley or through access on Garfield Ave. A roundabout provides a safe U -turn for
access to their driveways. A roundabout also provides safer crossings for pedestrians as
compared to the one-way stop.
Full access at Lakeshore Dr. Injury crash rate is twelve times the state average at this
intersection. Limiting vehicle turns will reduce the number and severity of crashes.
Signal at 67th St. 40-50% of traffic speeds along the corridor, especially dangerous in this area
with an older demographic. Roundabouts are proven to reduce traffic speeds. Roundabouts also
reduce the number of conflict points for vehicles and pedestrians creating a safer environment.
Back-in diagonal parking along City Bella property. This would provide an additio nal 15 parking
stalls. This alternative is still be reviewed with the property and city planning staff and may be
incorporated if a benefit is seen.
North Business Area: 68th St – 66th St
67th St to 66th St
Cycle Track & On-street Parking
Cycle track keeps consistency with
66th St.
Addition of on-street parking was a
common theme at all the open houses.