Loading...
09-11-78 agenda/J CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 275 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Approval of Preliminary Building Plans, Budget, Fee Schedule and Call for Bids for Golf Course Project The purpose of this letter is to recommend that the following actions be taken by the city council: 1. Approve the preliminary plans for the golf course buildings and authorize preparation of final design and specifications; 2. Approve Phases II and III of the agreement between the City of Richfield and Brauer and Associates for site planning services; 3. Approve plans and specifications for the relocation of four (4) ballfields, and authorize the advertise- ment for bids to relocate these facilities; 4. Adopt a financing plan for the golf course project. Preliminary Golf Course Building Plans The preliminary building plans call for a clubhouse and a maintenance building to be located on the golf course site. The clubhouse would provide approximately 2,400 square feet on each of two floors. The upper, or main level, would include a control area, office space, food service, storage space, seating space, vending space, toilets, and three entrances. The lower, or basement level, would include a cooler and food storage area, janitorial storage area, mechanical area, large multi - purpose space which would be used for purposes such as golf instruction, a stairway entrance, and a ramp entrance. The building is to be located on the site in such a way as to provide good visual control of the regulation 18 and par 3 courses as well as the putting green and driving range. The maintenance building and area will include outside storage, inside storage and work area, parts room, office space, lunchroom and toilets. The maintenance building and area is proposed to be located in the "outfield" area of the driving range.. I Council Letter No. 275 -2- September 11, 1978 A full presentation of the preliminary plans will be made by Richard Schwarz /Neil Weber, Inc. at the September 11, 1978 city council meeting. These plans have been reviewed by the golf course citizen committee and the park and.recreation advis- ory commission and both groups have recommended city council approv- al of the plans. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council approve the preliminary plans for golf course buildings and authorize Richard Schwarz /Neil Weber, Inc. to proceed with Phase II, providing for preparation of final plans and specifications. Phase II and Phase III, Site Planninq Services On June 12, 1978 the city council approved an agreement with Brauer and Associates for golf course site architectural services and authorized implementation of Phase I, preliminary plans, of the agreement on a.lump sum basis in the amount of $6,000. On August 28, 1978, the city council approved the preliminary site plan and .authorized preparation of final plans and specifications. The council must, however, approve implementation of additional phases of the agreement with- Brauer and Associates,-to enable preparation of these final plans and specifications. Phase II of the agreement provides for final plans and specif- ications, including preparation of complete design, working drawings and specifications for all golf course related facilities described in the approved preliminary plan and budget. Provisions will be made for alternates for the purpose of obtaining the most advantage- ous construction cost package. Drawings and specifications will be prepared on the basis of full construction management by Brauer and Associates during the construction phase of the project. Phase II would include meetings, as necessary, with various agencies and contractors, and preparation of detailed cost estimates. Phase III of the agreement provides for bidding procedures, including printing, binding and distribution of plans and specifi- cations, as well as bidder conferences, bid opening and bid review. Inasmuch as the ballfield relocation this fall would need to involve these types of services and close work with bonding consultants on bid results, Phase III should also be considered at this time. The consultant services for Phase II, as briefly described above, would be provided for a lump sum fee in the amount of $44,400. Phase III consultant services, as briefly described above, would be provided for a lump sum fee in the amount of $20,800. The golf course citizen committee and the park and recreation advisory commission have recommended that the city council approve continuation of the agreement with Brauer and Associates, including the arrangement for construction management. It is, therefore, recommended that the city council authorize the mayor and city manager to execute the agreement with Brauer and Associates to implement Phase II and Phase III of the agreement on the basis that construction management will be used for the project. Council Letter No. 275 -3- September 11, 1978 Ballfield Relocation The preliminary site plan, approved by the city council on August 28, 1978, includes the relocation of four ballfields. This item has been discussed with the golf course committee, the park and recreation advisory commission, and representatives of the various East Richfield youth baseball and softball organizations. It has been determined that a site east of 24th Avenue provides sufficient space for relocation of these fields. The site plans for this project will be presented at the September 11, 1978 city council meeting. The timetable for grading and seeding the fields is as follows: 1978 September.11 ti September 20 September 27 October 4 October 10 October 16 November 13 November 24 Approve plans, authorize ad- vertisement for bid Advertise for bid Advertise for bid Open bids Award of Contract Begin grading Begin seeding Complete grading and seeding By beginning the ballfield relocation this fall, sufficient time will be provided for maturation of turf areas, with fencing, dugout and other finishing work to.be completed in 1979. The facil- ities will be available for play in the spring of 1980. This sched- ule will not disrupt any play by East Richfield youth. By seeding this fall, substantial savings will be realized in the relocation because sod work will not be required. The golf course citizen committee and the park and recreation advisory commission have reviewed the proposal to relocate these ballfields and recommend that the city council approve the plans for the relocation of the four ballfields and authorize the adver- tisement for to complete the necessary landscape work. Financing Plan The estimated golf course construction cost has been set at $1,885,000. This estimate reflects the preliminary site plans approved by the city council on August 28, 1978 and the prelimin- ary building plans to be considered by the city council on Septem- ber 11. Discussions at the last city council meeting indicated a city council preference for supporting as much of the front end costs of the golf course as possible by current revenues. This kind of financing strategy would in turn decrease the amount of a gross revenue bond issue. Therefore, it is recommended that an amount of $275,000 in special revenue funds be added to the existing $310,000 appropriation for the golf course project. The appropriation of these additional special revenue funds should occur next year prior to the time that,-.construction bids are awarded. Appropriation of these current revenues would then make Council Letter No. 275 -4- September 11, 1978 it possible to sell a gross revenue bond issue in the amount of $1,300,000 to fund the balance of the project. In summary, the total golf course project budget of $1,885,000 is recommended to be.f inanced by the existing $310,000 appropriation, an additional special revenue fund appropriation of $275,000, and a .gross reven- ue bond issue in the amount of $1,300,000. This financing plan would support a project budget designed to include all preliminary costs, construction contracts, the purchase of initial equipment and supplies, consultant fees, capitalized interest, and reserve accounts. Revenues to be gener- ated from operation of the golf course have been estimated to be sufficient to retire the gross revenue bond issue and fund the operation of the facilities on an annual basis. Summary All the study and project work undertaken to date indicates that the proposed Richfield Municipal Golf Course is a feasible project. Approvals have been secured from a number of agencies concerned with the project, including the Metropolitan Airport Comm- ission, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Federal Aviation Administration. Preliminary site plans have been approved. An economic feasibility study has been conducted, received and filed. With council approval of the preliminary site plan and author- ization to continue subsequent phases of the consultant agreement on September 11, 1978, both the site and building architects may proceed with preparation of final plans and specifications. Authorization to call for bids for ballfield relocation will enable this work to proceed so as to not interrupt play as a result of the golf course project. ' Adoption of the financial plan providing for a total project budget of $1,885,000 will allow economic advancement of the project. It is recommended that the city council take the actions out- lined in this letter to enable continued implementation of the golf course project in accordance with the necessary timetable. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: Park and Recreation Director Finance Director City Attorney e ' d EAST ELEVATION earth berm i T MEN (r LUNCH STOR. WOMEN REPAIR LOF C E STORAGE ' —Ti— heated area •f 4) ICE YARD 0 +i } RICHFIELD GOLF II I i • Ii �I j � I I I I � SEATING � • "� ' � SEAT �I WOMEN ' VENDING I DN FOOD SERVICE LOCKERS }iJANITOR l I ` -SEAT CONTROL CONTROL FOOD PR =-P LL MEN F I II `� FOODI RAMP j OFFICE i STORAGE i i I• � -- i j MAIN FLOOR PLAN --4 %4 O S I� t3 I` \N °qry PROPOSED CLI✓�� -. ,:.,. RICHFIELD .GOLF Cvvr�SC im P 3W. Richard Schwarz / Noi CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 267 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: L /H4N Public Improvements Change Orders There is an item on the September 11, 1978 city council agenda relating to change orders for County Project No. 7625, the street improvements being undertaken as part of the L /H /N project. Both of the change orders recommended in this council letter relate to storm sewer construction on 65th Street. The first change order represents an addition to the contract in the amount`of $5,668. It has been determined that the storm sewer construction on 65th Street will necessitate the removal and replacement of certain traffic signal poles, bases, conduits and wiring on the north side of the 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue intersection. The purpose of this change order is to cover the cost of removal and replacement of those items. The second change order would increase the construction con- tract by $8,000. The purpose of this change order is to extend the new storm sewer on 65th Street an additional 150 feet for the purpose of adding catch basins at the low point on 65th Street between Grand Avenue and Pleasant Avenues. The additional 150 feetof storm sewer would be 18" sewer constructed to the point of termination at the new catch basins. This additional storm sewer protection had been requested by the owner of an apartment build- ing on the north side of 65th Street, which along with the tele- phone company building, is the lowest building in the area. Our consulting engineers considered several alternative ways of pro- viding additional storm s -ewer protection in this area and have recommended this change order as the most economical way of mini- mizing flooding potential on 65th Street. It will be a benefit to adjacent property owners. It is the recommendation of the public works director, in which I concur, that the city council approve both of the change orders described herein. Respe /c /t�fully ubmitted, cc: Public Works Director A "`� Z ' Finance Director Ping. & Redev. Dir. Wayne S. Burggraa City Manager l/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 266 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Off - Street Parking - Contract, 7708 Fifth Avenue Shakey's Pizza, 7716 Morgan Avenue, has applied for per - mission to establish an off - street parking lot at 7708 Fifth Avenue. The applicant proposes to construct an office building on the site to house the regional offices of the Shakey Pizza Corporation. The office building will be constructed on vacant land bounded on the north by Richfield Wheel Alignment and on the south by Bon Auto Works. The proposed structure is a permitted use in this General Industrial zoning district. The proposal submitted by the applicant provides for a driveway access from Fifth Avenue, and sixteen parking spaces to be constructed para- llel to Fifth Avenue, with eight spaces facing north and eight facing south. The public works director has reviewed this application to assure compliance by the applicant of all ordinance provisions regulating off - street parking contracts. It is his recommenda- tion, in which I concur, that the city council approve execution of this off - street parking contract. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: Planning & Redevelopment Director Public Works Director r I OFF STREET PARKING NO. 78 -9 OWNER AND ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: USE: DATE OF APPLICATION: COUNCIL ACTION: NO. PARKING SPACES: W Q L Shakey's Pizza 7716 Morgan Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota, 55423 1 V Scale: I "= 30' Lot 1, Block 2, Ranf.t's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota 7708 Fifth Avenue South, Richfield, MN Office Building August 10, 1978 September 11, 1978 16 M 30� L0 N tD OFF STREET PARKING NO. 78 -9 OWNER AND ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: USE: DATE OF APPLICATION: COUNCIL ACTION: NO. PARKING SPACES: W Q L Shakey's Pizza 7716 Morgan Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota, 55423 1 V Scale: I "= 30' Lot 1, Block 2, Ranf.t's Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota 7708 Fifth Avenue South, Richfield, MN Office Building August 10, 1978 September 11, 1978 16 r' s CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 265 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Bonding Of Automobile Dealers, First Reading The State of Minnesota has adopted legislation which re- quires the bonding of automobile dealers to the exclusion of any local bond requirements. Richfield city ordinance current- ly requires all motor vehicle dealers to obtain bonds. Although the state legislation now requires automobile dealers to be bonded by the state, the state has not provided for bonding of the sales of motor bike dealers. Therefore, the city attorney has drafted a proposed ordinance amendment which would retain the local requirement for bonding of motor bike dealers and all other motor vehicle dealers except those motor vehicle dealers required under state law to obtain bonds. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached. It is recommended that the city council give first reading con- sideration to this proposed ordinance amendment at the September 11, 1978 city council meeting. WSB /eja cc: City Clerk Deputy City Clerk City Attorney Respectfully ubmitted, ULJ Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager f 'yet•.- � 1F � AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER VI, SECTION 6.07 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter VI, Section 6.07 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota dealing with the licensing and regulating of motor vehicle dealers is amended by amending Subdivision 6 thereof to read as follows: "Subd. 6. Bond Requirements. Except in the case of motor vehicle dealers required to obtain bonds pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 168.27 Subdivision 24, [T] the following bond requirements shall be imposed: (1) Each application shall be accompanied by a bond in the amount of $5,000 running to the city for the benefit of any person who sustains any injury covered by the bond. (2) The bond shall be executed by the applicant, as principal, and by a corporation which is licensed in this state to transact the business of fidelity and surety insurance, as surety. (3) The bond shall be so conditioned that the principal will indemnify any person for: (a) Any direct loss suffered by dishonesty on the part of the principal in the substitution of a motor vehicle or parts thereof other than the one selected by the purchaser; (b) Failure, through dishonesty, to deliver a clear title to those legally entitled thereto. (c) Any misappropriation of monies or property belonging to a purchaser, received by the principal in payment for a motor vehicle; (d) Any loss due to an alteration of a motor vehicle made by the principal in order to deceive the purchaser as to the year model of any motor vehicle sold; (e) The violation of any of the provisions of this section. (4) Regardless of the number of licenses issued to one licensee, such licensee need file only one bond; provided, however, that the city reserves the right to increase the bond amount if more than one licensed establishment is to be concerned. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , 1978. ATTEST: Thomas Moran, City Clerk Loren L. Law, Mayor CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 264 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor . and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Transitory Ordinance Appropriating Monies from the Special Revenue Fund, Second Reading On August 28, 1978, the city council gave first reading approval to a transitory ordinance appropriating monies from the special revenue fund. This appropriation of $10,000 in special revenue funds is included in the 1977/83 Capital Im- provement Program for the purpose of park land acquisition. A copy of Transitory Ordinance No. 16.52 is attached. It is recommended that the city council give second reading approval to this transitory ordinance at the September 11, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: Finance Director City Attorney Park and Recreation Director 0 Bill 1978-20 TRANSITORY ORDINANCE 16.52. AN ORDINTiINCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITUP E OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the city to expend money from The Special Revenue Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2. The capital improvements and the amounts of expenditures for such improvements, which are authorized to be paid from The Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, Subd. 2 of the City Charter, are as follows: Park Improvements $10,000 Section 3. The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council action. Proposed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 28th day of August, 1978. All persons interested for or against this proposed ordinance amendment are notified to be present September 11, 1970' and they will be heard. BY ORDER OF THE COUNCIL August 23, 1978 Publish Sep tuber 1, 1975 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 262 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Licensing and Operation of Bicycles, Second Reading On August 14, 1978, the city council gave first reading approval to an ordinance amendment which would establish a licen- sing procedure for the City of Richfield in accordance with the uniform bicycle licensing requirement established by the State of Minnesota. Attached to this council letter is a copy of the proposed ordinance amendment reflecting the changes required by the new state statutes. It is recommended that the city council give second reading approval to this ordinance amendment at the September 11, 1978 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager WSB /eja cc: City Attorney Public Safety Director Deputy City Clerk AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER V, PART IV, SECTION 5.34 OF THE RICHFIELD ORDINANCE CODE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDIAN: Chapter V, Part IV, Section 5.34 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, relating to the licensing and operation of bicycles is hereby amended to. read as follows: "5.34 BICYCLES Subdivision 1. License Required. No person shall operate or use any bicycle as defined in Minnesota Statutes 1976, Section 168C.02 on any street, alley or highway which is not currently registered by the State of Minnesota or which does not display a currently valid license sticker issued by the State of Minnesota Cwithout first obtaining a license). [Subd. 2. Application and Issuance. The clerk shall issue a license upon receipt of a complete orm therefor and the proper license fee. C Subd. 3. License Fee. The license fee is as provided in Appendix D of this Code. Bill 1977 -16) 8/8/77 7 E Subd. 4. Duration of License. Licenses shall be valid as long as the licensee owns the licensed bicycle.? (Bill 1975 -6) 2/10/75 C Subd. 5. License Plate and Registration Card. The City shall issue a tag plate, sea or o er ev1ce earing e icense number assigned to the bicyle and the name of the City of Richfield suitable for atta- chment to the bicycle frame. A registration card shall be issued to the licensee which shall show the name and address of the licensee, the name of the manufacturer of the bicycle, itsframe number, the type of bicycle and the license number and date of issue. No license shall issue until all such information has been supplied by the person seeking licensure. The-city shall keep and maintain a duplicate registration card. The license plate tag, seal or other device shall be attached to the licensed bicycle during the effective period of the license. (Bill 1975 -6) 2/10/75 Subd. C61 2. Destruction of License Plate. C Any No person Ewhol shall remove C s 3 destroy[ s1 , muti 1 ateCs g , or alter Cs l any bicycle license plate during the effective period of the license Cis guilty of a misdemeanor :1. CSubd. 7. Sales of Licensed Bicycles. Any person who sells, gives, or otherwise transfers ownership of any licensed bicycle shall report such sale or transfer to the city by delivering to the License Division the detachable portion of his registration card, together with the name and address of the person to whom said bicycle was sold or trans- ferred. The report shall be made within five days of the date of the sale or transfer. The purchaser or transferee shall, if a resident of the city, make application for a transfer of the registration with- in ten days of the sale or transfer and shall obtain a new registration card from the License Division upon payment of the license fee, provided however, that no new license shall be issued until after the seller or transferrer has reported the transfer or sale to the city. (Bill 1975 -6) 2/10/75 Subd. E83 3. Restrictions on Bicycle Riding- State Law Adopted by Reference. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169 which are expressly applicable to bicycles and bicycle riding are hereby adopted by reference as is fully set forth herein. These statutory provisions and the provisions relating to bicycles in Chapter IX of this code govern the riding of bicycles within the city. Wherever the city has provided sidewalks and bituminous ramps adjacent to streets for the accommodation of bicycle riders, such sidewalks and ramps shall be regarded as usable paths within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes 169.221, Subd. 4 paragraph (c) and Minnesota Statutes 160.263. Subd. 4. Impoundment of Bicycles. The department of Public Safety may impound bicycles which are being operated of used in violation or Subd. 1. of this section. The Department of Public Safety may also impound unregistered bicycles found on or adjacent to any street, alley or highway. Any bicycleimpoanded pursuant to this section shall be re- turned to its owner upon display of a currently valid state registration covering this bicycle. [Subd. 9. Revocation. Violation of any of the provisions of this section or of any of the provisions adopted by reference in Sub- division 8 shall be grounds for revocation of any license issued pursuant to this section.] " ESubd. 10. Replacement of Lost License or Registration. Upon appli- cation and satisfactory evidence of loss of a license or registration card and the payment of a $.75 fee, the License Division shall issue a duplicate replacement plate or card. (1975 -6) 21101751 Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of 1978. ATTEST: Thomas Moran, City Clerk 11 Loren L. Law, Mayor CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 261 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Reconsideration of Kennel License Application At the July 24, 1978 city council meeting, the city council took action to deny issuance of a kennel license to Ms. Garnette Kelber, 6314 14th Avenue. Attached to this council letter is a request from Ms. Kelber to appear before the city council at the September 11, 1978 city council meeting for reconsideration of her kennel license application. RespectfuS 11 submitted, &t& Wayne S. Burggra , City Manager WSB /eja cc: Deputy City Clerk 1l7f 7 A! IG 311978 Richfield City Manager L/C-, APPLICANT: ADDRESS: RESIDENTIAL ANIMAL KENNEL REPORT GARNETTE W. KELBER 6314 - 14th Avenue Q NEW APPLICATION E�J RENEWAL Applicant's statement concerning number and types of animals: 15 Cats - 7 female, 8 male - all neutered (7 Siamese, 1 domestic short hair, 2 Himalayan, 5 half - Himalayan SANITARIAN'S INSPECTION REPORT: June 9, 1978 An appointment was made with Mrs. Kelber to inspect the house and kennel. The interior and yard area were neat and clean. Mrs. Kelber, who is 74 years old, mairrtains her property quite well although she is employed full -time. The screened -in kennel area, about 15' x 30'.x 9' is located on the north side of the house. Cats gain entry to the kennel through a small door opening in one of the house basement windows. Cats are permitted access throughout the house, except for the living room and rear porch areas. The eight litter boxes in the basement are cleaned twice a day and oftener if necessary. At the time of inspection the boxes were clean; wastes from the boxes are stored in covered garbage cans. Cats are fed dry food in the kitchen. When canned food is fed, left -overs are removed after ten minutes. Mrs. Kelber plans to build an addition to the rear of her house this summer. APPROVAL OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS: 1• Susan Zuhlsdorf 2. Gregory Hendricks 3. Edna Kieselhorst DA'T'ED: June 30, 1978 I. F. Roesler Environmental Health Director 6315 - 13th Avenue 6308 - 14th Avenue 6320 - 14th Avenue r M CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager S Council Letter No. 260 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Hon able Mayor Members of the--C-i City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Hearing on Assessment Rolls for 1977 Street Improvment Project No. 686, Areas No. 12 and 14 September 11, 1978 has been scheduled as the hearing date on the assessment rolls for the 1977 permanent street improve- ment construction project. This hearing-will cover the con- struction work performed in Citv Project No. 686 in areas Nos. 12 and 14 as shown on the attached map. Area No. 12 is the area from 62nd Street to 66th Street between Nicollet Avenue and 35W, and area 14 is the Rich Acres area adjacent to the Metropolitan Airports Commission property. ,�v kf,gi Each property owner to be assessed for this street improve- ment work has received two letters from the city. The first letter requested the proper y owners o a vise tie city of any defects or problems concerning the project of which they might be aware. Each response to that initial letter has either been answered through corrective work already completed or scheduled, or through an explanation to the resident describing the circum- stances involved in his particular situation. A second letter has also been sent, advising property owners of the date and time of the assessment hearing. This letter included the amount of the assessment, and a description of the alternative means by which the assessment could be paid. Approximately 360 parcels are included in the 1977 project areas Nos. 12 and 14. The assessment rolls for this project have been calculated in accordance with the street improvement assessment policy adopted by the city council in June, 1970. An important element in the citywide street improvement project, is the position of the city council that the assessment policy ad- opted in 1970 will remain in effect until completion of the entire project. This means that all property owners will receive equal treatment for assessment, using standardized criteria. Previous assessment rolls have been adopted based on this policy. Property owners have also previously been advised of the assessment policies at public informational meetings, public hearings, and by way of printed material and audio visual information aids prepared by Council Letter No. 260 -2- September 11, 1978 the city. City Project No. 686, the 1977 street improvement project, is the final portion of the citywide permanent street improvement program. It is recommmended that at the close of the hearing, the city council adopt the attached resolution providing for adoption of the assessment rolls for the 1977 permanent street improvement project No. 686 in areas Nos. 12 and 14. Respectfully ubmitted, �(Qt1a- �; . K 1, 1 ?- Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: Finance Director Public Works Director City Attorney to — I wi C fz� — 1: 3. 3 3nv ♦xodm _ � I __ Q ; I wi C RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON CITY PROJECT NO. 686 AREAS NUMBERS 12 AND 14A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the City Clerk, has, with the assistance of the City Engineer, calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for the 1977 Permanent Street Program, City Project No. 686, Areas 12 and 14A, against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land specially benefited thereby in accordance with the provisions of law, and the proposed assessment so made up was filed with the City Clerk for more than 15 days prior to the assessment hearing and was open to public inspection during said period. 2. That notice has been duly published and a public hearing heretofore duly held as required by law so that this council could meet and pass upon the proposed assessment. 3. That an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment or to any item thereof at said public hearing. 4. That the City Council has heretofore duly established City Project No. 686, Areas 12 and 14A, and after carefully considering all the facts, the benefits to each lot, piece or parcel of land and fully advising itself in the premises, has found and determined and hereby declares that each and every lot, piece or parcel of land included in said proposed assessment roll was ' improved by reason of the construction of said City Project No. 686, in Areas No. 12 and 14A, and has been and is specially benefited in the amount set out in said proposed assessment roll opposite each such lot, piece or parcel of land. q01 70 3 5. The proposed total assessment in the amount of $42,175,373 is hereby affirmed, adopted and confirmed and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment are affirmed, adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively, and said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 6. Said assessment is hereby affirmed, adopted, confirmed and shall be certified by the City Clerk and filed in his office, and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for said City Project No. 686, in Areas No.12 and 14A Permanent Street Program. P A r Resolution No. -2- 7. The assessment with accruing interest, shall be a lien upon the property included therein, concurrent with general taxes, and shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 20 years. The first installment shall be payable on the first Monday in January of 1979. All assessments shall bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the certification of this resolution until December 31, 1979, to each subsequent installment shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. All assessments and interest thereon shall be collected and paid -over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day of September, 1978. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk Loren L. Law Mayor CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Council Letter No. 259 Agenda September 11, 1978 19 Subject: Request for Authorization to Call for Bids The 1978 budget for the public safety department's emergency services division provides funding for the upgrading and install- ation of sirens included in the city's civil defense warning system. It is anticipated that one civil defense siren will be replaced and three sirens relocated this year and for the next two years under a program whereby the federal government will provide reimbursement for 75 percent of the cost of this upgrad- ing and siren installation. At the completion of this three year program, the city will have three new sirens, and have all exist- ing sirens relocated so that the warning system is distributed evenly throughout the community. The public safety director has recently received word that federal funds will be available shortly to support the 1978 portion of our siren improvement project. Therefore, it is the recomm- endation of the public safety director, in which I concur, that the city council authorize the advertisement for bids for the 1978 siren warning system improvement project. Respectfully ubmitted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: Public Safety Director le CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 258 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Appointments to Citizens Advisory Commissions The purpose of this council letter is to consider appoint- ment of members to an existing vacancy on the Senior Citizens/ Handicapped Commission and the Advisory Board of Health. There is presently one vacancy on the Senior Citizens/ Handicapped Commission for a term which will expire February 1, 1980. This vacancy has resulted from the recent resignation of Mr. Alvin Olson. Attached for council consideration is an application from Sister Charlotte Ann LeClair, who has express- ed an interest in being appointed to this commission. There are also two existing vacancies on the Richfield Advisory Board of Health. One recent vacancy has resulted from the resignation of Mrs. Kay Dahlgren, and is for a term which will expire January 1, 1980. Attached to this council letter is an application from Ms. Charlene Swanell, who has expressed an interest in being appointed to this commission. The remaining vacancy on the Board of Health is for a term that will expire on January, 1979 and is for a health consumer. Council members may wish to discuss possible appointments to this commission at this.time as well. Respectfully ubmitted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: Park and Recreation Director Environmental Health Director Administrative Assistant Date July 31, 1978 APPLICATIO'vT F'OR Crp : OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR C01_1VISSION APPOi�iT" NAME LeClair, Sister Charlotte Ann_, CSJ Last irc;t Academy of the Holy Angels HOME ADDRESS 6600 Nicollet Avenue, Richfield, Tlinnesota Street No. Cit,r MAILING ADDRESS (if different from horse address) SAIIE Street No. PHONE: Home 866-3327 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm, Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission X -j F tir Business 332 -5521 55423 �1P i :? L J �dL Hum „an Rights Commission, —: �.:�.�i Service Commission_ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience v✓hich you believe qualify, you for this municipal commission/committee and why �,-ou are ,nterested in servLng: First -- When I attended the evening Handicapped Awareness program in April, I was astounded to discover that ten percent of the Richfield population has one or o er RnM of isa 1 i uy. econ -- I shall turn into a senior citizen nexf- October 7. Third -- I work at St. iiary's Junior College where we have special programs 5 s physical., reopiratery., cupational therapies, and special education for working with mentally retarded, develop - m.nnt.ally taisahlFd, and the _1PyPrP1yfprnfaund1y Nandinarped .-- rail directl�r r-1 —cj t0 the purpose of this Commission. The educators in each can prove to be excellent resources for ideas, practical suggestions, and intellectual background for the kind of community service this Commission offers. Fourth -- I understand the Commission would welcome another member, Mille my UacKeiorls and master's degrees nave been in s or r a-n-d education MY CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, AND COMMU'' TT`,' ACTIVITIES; (next page, please) Richfield Charter Commission Joint Religious Legislative Coalition League of Idomen Voters, Richfield Core member of Town eetirg committee, Richfield, 1976 RING committee member from its inception In my religious community, I served this ,-rear on the provincial Chapter and attended the national chapter in Los Angeles in July; also core member of Personal Development Secretariat for four years OCCUPATION: Employing ,firm, agency Anatomy and Physiology Department, St. Plaryts Jr. College Address 2500 South Sixth Streets Plinneapolis, 1innesota 55454 Testing, research, some studying, irriting, Position tutoring & secretarial cork "_ "ears /firr;,agenc. - 5 Other work experience (optional) ':;aching, various t:Tpes of administration in seven Catholic high schools in _innesota and North Dakota, and one sumierts teaching at The College of St. Catherine -- 37 years. ='EF- RENCES (Optional) mfrs. Charles (Betty) Carr Friend Full name Relationship 6633 Lynnwood Eoulevard, Richfield 869 -5215 Mailing address Phone number Hrs. John (Joan) HeImberger Friend +J . Full name Relationship 6914 Park Avenue, Richfield 869-8057 Mailing address Phone number Iss. Jerome (Gertrude) Ulrich Friend Full name Relationship 7601 Aldrich Avenue South, Richfield 866 -8171 Friend Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield S5423 Att: Eileen An.ierson ST MARY'S JUNOR COLLEGE Jul 2500 South Sixth Street �IUTMinneapolis, Minnesota 55454 (612) 332 -5521 Sister Charlotte Ann LeClair, CSJ continuation of paragraph 1: other qualifications which would be helpful because they are diverse, include work in music., geography, library, and English., and ancillary study in speech., counselling, sociology, journalism, theology, anatomy, physiology., and pathology. Having taught in high school for 37 years and having worked in a health care education center, St. iiaryts Junior College, for five years, I know the value of cooperative effort. I believe I could serve effectively on the Commission by working with others to make their ideas and my own become realities of value, especially in the sphere of helping very elderly and /or handicapped shut -ins whose social, religious, and possibly even economic hungers need assuagement. Avenues of discovering these people could be by working through the churches and by using, if available, the census presently being conducted by the League of T;_Tomen Voters in Richfield. Another facet of help could come through working with an Academy of the Holy Angels instructor who is specializing in the problem of illiteracy in communities and who would be interested in working with the Commission, should illiteracy be a problem the members would wish to address. Like the deacons at ordination, I am ready and willing to servet A a Date APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTN NAMEti - Last HOME ADDRESS First Street No. Cit MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City PHONE: Home A,W_ Business :APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: U 9n V A! IG 311978, WWP,le cl - tY P Tanager Zip Code Zip Code Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped. Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: 7 CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: i 2�_ OCCUPATION: Employing firm, agency Address Years W/firm/agency Other work experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) A. Full name " Relationship Mailing address Phone number B I ? Full name Relationship /X Mailing address Phone number C. Full name Mailing address - Relationship Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield SS423 Att: Eileen Anderson CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager /; = Council Letter No. 257 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Setting Date for Canvass of Election The City Charter requires that the council shall meet and canvass.election returns within five days after any regular, primary, or special election. The city primary.election will occur on September 12, 1978. Inasmuch as the council has al- ready scheduled a special hearing on the 1979 budget for Thursday, September 14, 1978, it is recommended that the council set the date for canvassing the election for September 14, 1978 at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully ubmitted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: City Clerk A i 1-/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 274 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Preliminary Plat Approval, Wilmar Henrickson Addition An application for approval of a preliminary plat has been submitted by Wilmar Henrickson. The proposed plat would subdivide the property located at 7409 Sheridan Avenue into Block 1, lots 1 -6, Wilmar Henrickson Addition. The applicant has also requested a variance to the minimum lot width requirements of the subdivision regulations. The following items are attached to this council letter: Preliminary plat map Proposed Storm sewer line Surrounding lot size map Conditions for approving plats Background Existing Lot Size: 206' x 168' (34,608 sq. ft.) Proposed Lot Sizes: Six lots, 68.75' x 134.46' (9,244 sq. ft each) Required Min. Lot Width: 75 feet Proposed lot Width: 68.75 feet Typical Richfield Lot Width: 50 feet to 75 feet wide Required Min. Lot Area: 8,000 square feet Proposed Lot Area: 9,244 square feet Site Zoning and Land Use:Single Family Residential Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: N- Single family residential E- Single family residential. W- Single family residential S- Public (Lincoln Hills School) Proposed Use: Single family dwellings Staff Review The staff has reviewed the proposal against the conditions for plat approval, and made the following findings: Council Letter No. 274 -2- September 11, 1978 Streets - Streets have already been established in the area and the proper street easements appear in the legal description. Easements - The plat indicates that proper five -foot easements are present on side and rear lot lines. Lot Size - The proposed subdivision of land would create lots which are substandard in terms of the city's subdivision ordinance. The lots are proposed to have lot widths of 68.75 feet rather than the 75 foot width required by ordinance (Section 3.57, subdivision 1). The lots would, however, meet the minimum lot area requirements. The subdivided lots would have areas of 9,244 square feet, which is 1,244 square feet over the minimum 8,000 square foot lot size re- quirement. Lot standards are established to ensure proper spacing of build- ings, to allow proper circulation of air, proper penetration of light, sufficient access to structures by emergency equipment, separation of structures from negative noise and pollution impacts of streets, and to provide open space amenities. The city's subdivision regulations, in Section 3.58, allows the council to vary subdivision requirements under the following con- ditions: "Whenever the tract to be subdivided or platted is of such unusual size or shape, or is surrounded by such development or unusual conditions that the strict applica- tion of the requirements contained in this part would re- sult in a substantial hardship or injustice, the council may vary or modify such requirements so that the subdivider is allowed to develop his property in a reasonable manner, but in such a manner that the public welfare and interests of the city and surrounding area are protected and the general intent and spirit of these regulations are preserved." It is the opinion of the staff that the requested variance should be granted. While most lots in the area in which the site is located are 75 -foot wide lots, the proposed 68.75 lots would be larger than the 46 -foot wide residential lots adjacent to the site on the north and would be in character with typical lot sizes within Richfield as a whole. The 68.75 foot width would still allow for the development of dwellings of similar size as those in the surrounding area. If the variance were denied the applicant could potentially suffer a financial hardship in that fewer lots could be developed, which would raise the sales price of the lots and reduce their marketability. It is a goal of the city to provide housing to people of a variety of income levels. As the price of housing rises, fewer families can afford new single family dwellings. To accomplish the above mentioned goal, the city should, therefore, encourage developments which provide affordable housing. If the variance were granted, the applicant could develop the property in a manner which would be in character for the City of Richfield, which would Council Letter No. 274 -3- September 11, 1978 meet the intent of the subdivision regulations, and which would make the proposed development more affordable to more families. Utilities - The water and sanitary sewer lines in the area are sufficient to handle the proposed development. There is, however, a drainage problem in the area. The topography of the land is such that water drains down the center of the parcel onto Russell Avenue and pools on the adjacent school property. A storm sewer line exists on Sheridan Avenue, but there is none on Russell Avenue. The applicant will install a 12 -inch storm sewer line and catch basin tied to the existing 24 inch storm sewer line on Sher- idan Avenue. The lots will be filled and graded so that water will drain to the proposed catch basin with the exception of the front part of the lots along Russell Avenue, which will drain to Russell Avenue and then to the school property. A small portion of the lots adjacent to the school property.will also drain to the school property. The proposed residences will be located at elevations which should prevent basement flooding even if the adjacent school property were to be filled and developed. The public works director has determin- ed that these improvements should alleviate any major potential drainage problems. Other - A sidewalk does not currently exist along Russell Avenue, although the site's proximity to the Lincoln Hills School indicates a need for a sidewalk. The applicant should be encouraged to preserve as many of the trees and bushes on the site as is feasible to maintain the aesthetic appearance of the site. Staff Recommendation Based on the above findings, the staff recommends that the city council take the following actions: 1. Approve the preliminary plat subject to the following: A. That a sidewalk be put in along Russell Avenue to improve pedestrian access to Lincoln Hills School B. That a variance to the minimum lot width require- ments be obtained 2. Grant a variance to the minimum lot width requirements of the subdivision regulations Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission reviewed this case at their regular meeting of August 22, 1978. No residents appeared at the meeting. The planning commission discussed possible ways of correcting the Council Letter No. 274 -4- September 11, 1978 drainage problem. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the preliminary plat and grant the variance to the minimum lot width requirements. Respectfully submitted, Vjw E. Wayne S. Burggraa City Manager WSB /eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director Public Works Director -6 E S HERiDAN-- s '---SOU-TH 1 0 N I z c t oi �9 7- 697- 01 r o rri 042 6375 . .... 65 7 C-a 75 1 j9 P0625 N O°00 22%� H " ----------------- cr " ----------------- Z�Z ' _ D wnr- WEST LINE OF THE EAST 3/8 OF THE p W z �— N 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 32 2 9•,�Ir WATER' --- 206.25 IS 0° 02' 26° E / � m %"1 y `- 9.' SAN S m 1 - - -- 24 " R C P ST. S m _�139,, 139. S T C O C 9 6 T � 9 o 0 T C � 9 � 1 7 f - -- � -- C EXISTING - St ;.EWALK Q6 - 0­21 ° 2 -- – S _46 E 1.8 G3 - - -" I X8775 — — — —_ 8.75 68.75 F ° 0 0 0 g" �� o ,5 I fill" % I o I n �7 ° 405 j , 141.0 m -- n Iv _ 431 �z 141 t, mD m 1 m m E.� r-1 `� -- - I z { z �42f —I I a n ° N �- I t0 O i (fl I 1 I - f 4- 0 1 �l+ DO \ �40 - 1 0 n D I G 1 i i -a I _ p' b ;. oo io ~ \\ -n a t0 5 F m o° m Nt- \ 9 'O rl I n y > b 51 15 5 / 1 L — _J -- >, 68.7 U 0 °01'24 "E / ! 23 - ' 68 i 1 C, S 001 E-- 68.75`'1 �` SO° ?4 E 5 rW 5 5 i/I5 5 I La 03 —i /Zy� �i r 0D I Cii .wr M Z C i+l v n N m o WN A m / cn m r - -= m' u o / Z ,' w cD 0) I /4/ ° W o m u CD tD cD o m JS W A (11 N 0 1 95 1 4 1 10 I O N J 2 y S X (Nib D rn Ln 74 /- _ x 15 2 Lr- 7- lo 12 F 1I Ell" 77 10 !7 A- 17 O I 15 2 LLJ -j 14 3 > pw —L–A-7 14 13 < 1 2 5 < 11 6 Li io El 12'5 Ell 11 .6 5 4 If 6 LIJ 73rd io 17 15 2 Lr- 7- lo 12 F 1I Ell" 77 10 !7 A- 17 O I El 15 2 14 3 14 3 71 < IM pw —L–A-7 14 13 fJ 1 2 5 < 11 6 El 12'5 Ell 11 .6 5 4 If 6 LIJ .7 El- io 17 10 :7 L L. 9 a Li - 71 9 a —j ED 9 a El 15 2 14 3 14 3 71 < IM pw —L–A-7 14 13 fJ 1 12't ti 11 6 El 12'5 Ell D�r 5 4 LIJ LIJ El El Ll •2 14 i 13 14 12 15 :1 16 10 7 9 1 2600 J3 14 3 Z TERRAW i 71 < IM Ll. z, 14 13 0 IIIIIN `! LLJ 12't U) !I- 11 6 12'5 i 13 14 12 15 :1 16 10 7 9 1 2600 LU QI 5 1 1 rl -_J -- _ Ili- �� _81 4 Lij (f) 15 2 L 14 3 fhq,-5 13 !4 El 12 5 17 9 8 under 50. 6.0-69 10 ;7 J3 ,7 2601 Li 10 t3 I > In 1 2 15 [ 14 13 13 7 2 LJ Ll 12'5 D�r LU QI 5 1 1 rl -_J -- _ Ili- �� _81 4 Lij (f) 15 2 L 14 3 fhq,-5 13 !4 El 12 5 17 9 8 under 50. 6.0-69 10 ;7 J3 In r 7 2 LJ 5 4 LIJ LIJ to the city a,penalty of $100 for each lot or parcel so conveyed as provided by law. Any penalty so levied may be collected by the city by action in a court with jurisdiction. Subd. 7. Non - Compliance - Injunction. The city, in addition to the penalty provisions of Subdivision 6 of this section, is empowered to enjoin any con- veyance not complying with this section. Subd. 8. Scope of Section. This part does not apply to plats recorded prior to March 11, 1940, or to the sale or exchange of small parcels of land to or between adjoining property owners where such sale or exchange does not create an additional lot or space sufficient to construct an additional residence thereon. Subd. 9. Applications for plat or subdivision approval or for waiver of pre- liminary platting procedures shall be accompanied by the fee provided in Appendix D of this Code. (Bill 1977 -16) 8/8/77 3.55 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL Subdivision 1. Streets. Before the approval of any plat or subdivision, it shall be checked as to measurements of all lots, streets and public lands. All proposed streets on such plat or subdivision shall conform to the street plan of the city as hereinafter specified. In considering requirements for the location and width of streets, consideration may be given to the prospective character of the development, and reasonable conditions and requirements for the establishment of such streets may be required by the council as a condition precedent to approval of the plat or subdivision. Subd. 2. Grades, Utilities, etc. As a condition precedent to the approval of the plat of lands located within the city limits, the council may prescribe requirements of the extent to which and the manner in which streets shall be granted and improved, utilities installed, and any other matters reasonably related to the manner in which the area being subdivided or platted shall be developed. Subd. 3. Dedication of Park Land. In appropriate plats or subdivisions to be developed for residential uses, the council may also require that a portion of such land of sufficient size and character be set aside and dedicated to the public for public use as parks and playgrounds. The subdivider may, however, at his option contribute an equivalent amount in cash and all such payments re- ceived by the city shall be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition of land for parks and playgrounds. Subd. 4. Contract and Bond. In lieu of the completion of work required as a condition precedent to approval of a subdivision or plat, the council may give approval upon the execution of a contract and bond in form and amount satis- factory to the council, providing for and securing to the city the actual construction and installation of such improvements, utilities and other develop- ments within the period specified in said contract and bond, not exceeding two years. ORDINANCE CODE 8/8/77 94 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO IA Subd. 5. Pub )-ic Improvements - Limitation. Except as otherwise provided in this part, no electric or gas distribution lines and piping, roadways, walks, curbs and other similar improvements shall be constructed on any street until the street has been approved by being designated upon a plat or subdivision duly approved and accepted by the council or previously accepted as a public street by the council. Subd. 6. Issuance of Building Permits - Condition. No permit for the erection of any building shall be issued unless it shall be located upon a street or high- ORDINANCE CODE 4/8/68 94.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD. MINNESO fA way giving access thereto which has been duly approved and made a part of the street plan of this city and unless such, building con=orms to the building line established upon the street or proposed street where it is to be located. "-o permit for the erection of any building shall be issued unless the buil2lin2 is to be located upon a full -idth, improved street or highway, and at suc`: an elevation that such builr- ; can be- served by the municipal sani`ary se,er sy_- tem by gravity `low, unl:.. the permission of the council is first obtained. This provision is applicable to building permits to be issued for any reel land whether heretofore or hereafter platted or subdivided. Subd. 7. Building Permits -- Violation of this Part. No build-L',11- De-=it shall be issued for the construction of any building on a parcel convened in violation of the provisions of this part. CROSS - REFERENCE: See Chap. III, Part I, Sec. 3.06, fir general provisions relating to Building and Construction permits. 3.56. STREETS, ALLEYS AND EASEMENTS -- CONDITIONS, Subdivision 1. Arrangement of Streets. The arrangement of streets in new sub- divisions or plats shall be so laid out as to provide a continuation of existin_ streets of adjoining areas, whether in the city or in adjoining municipalities or the projection of east -west or north -south streets of the city if there are no adjoining streets. The width of streets in new subdivisions shall be not less than the minimum street width established herein. Offset or irregular streets are prohibited unless the topography of the area concerned makes the construction of regular streets impossible or impractical. Subd. 2. minor Streets -- Angles. Minor streets of irregular nature shoulz' ap- proach any major street except major diagonal streets hereinafter namac at an angle of between 80 degrees and 100 degrees. Subd. 3. M ajjor Streets -- Designation, Width. Major streets include: Penn :,ve- nue, Lyndale Avenue, Nicollet Avenue, Portland Avenue, Cedar Avenue, Standish Avenue and 66th Street. All major streets designated herein shall be 100 `feet in width, except where existing conditions make a street of less width ore suit- able as determined by the council. Subd. 4. Other Streets -- Nidth. The following streets shall have a width of sixty -six feet: Xerxes Avenue, Chicago Avenue and 12th Avenue. Subd. 5. Minor Streets -- 1,1i.dth. The minimuri width for Minor streets shall be 60 feet except that where existing conditions make a street of lea ic!t:: more suitable, the council may permit a street of less width. !then streets undivided Droperty, a half street may be dedicated, t�tien topo,-r: -phis nditi .._ „ro u n favorable to the construction of a half street, the subdivider mav re- quired to provide additional land to construct a street of adequate uhd. 6. klleyf3 -- ! <idth. The minimum width of tin :iilev in a r2sidilr.ti;:l ,:c shall be 15 feet, but allevs shall not be roouirod fcr any bloc:: exc, =­_ _- �ra[ hic conditions Eial e them necessarv. Allcys may `0 reQuirec" _ :i tl l all husinc-ss lilts any'., if required, shall be at Least _'0 feet cutoff shall be made to all acute alLev intor�c,ction�_. 95. Subd. %. Off -Str `c!: Parks --g Reau' E_men,is aciecuate L Gt11 ^_ ^5 'Ot C.; f- r parking 51 a11- bC' prQVii1C'd In connection with ?.11 subdivisions fr!' bll:_ l:if.S r F opment where the subdivider indicates teat such is the purpose of th- su�•di :Ti- SiO ^i and has made application for 3 CIll.di n?, E`?rmi C: for bu_S,i •.° _$ Subd. 8. Easements. ? dhere alleys are not_ a_ovic'_ed; easements of ,,,_.r less .._n a feet in width shall be. provided on each siac of all rear lot. 11 -es and .ai'. =^ side lot lines where necessary for any a- ic110f_ , P,,IeS: U:L_�-eS `�G?'i'i1t5, $c'.•% L , pipes OT maliiS for any p ;J _1c li 111iy, E a 5. 12 ?t =, !i: ?` °_c.t; =L aS 17` -V %E- .''- quLred under extraordinary conditions or `-opGPraphy or '_tilit';' i._ne grou1i:)4r 3.5' . ALDITIONAL - &F— ATIONS ; LOT AREAS , `JTIL y II P S Subdivision i. Minimum. Lot Area. Tile minimum area of tors ir, n1 :Ls or subOG _ visions shall be 8,000 square feet. The sranda_d width of loos shall be at loose feet. where corr_er lets rear upon lots °acsag the side street, tale corl-,7=r shall have extra width sufficient -to permit the estabiishment of front bui din lines on both the-front and side of the lots adjoining the streets. �.7 shall be provided on all ^Q_ner lots irrespec ve of whether " =hey rear upon lots facing the side streets. Subd. Z. Performance Bonds. 'Whenever any contract and bond for the develo=l-ent of a plat or subdivision is provided in lieu of performance of conditions precedent to council approval as provided in Section 3.55, Subd. 4 of this part, such con- tract and bond shall provide for performance within two years of the date of ap- proval of the plat. Such bond-shall be in an amount of one and o.: - alf times the actual established cost of the improvements -Iuired with form and sureties satisfactory to the council. 6)henever no lots ha , been sold, the subdivider may; vacate the plat prior to the time that the improvements covered by the contract and bond are installed, and when the plat is vacated, the bond shall be re :•:ned to the subdivider and the contract cancelled. Subd. 3. Street Opening. The opening and construction ny street shall not be started until agreement has been reached between the c_ -ncil and the property owner or developer upon the conditions under which the subdivision, plat, or street is to be developed. Subd. 4. Utilities. The subdivider shall make adequate provision for water sun - ply and for sewerage and storm water disposal. He shall provide the city wit', such information as may be necessary to a determination of the adequacy of tnc facilities proposed to be used for such purposes. The council may require to const r uction of water lines, sanitary sewer lines or storm sewer lilies alt :eu h connection to other lines outside the area may not he possible im.m.ediately plans for the installation of such lines in the area have been prepared by t: fn2ineer or other competent person and construction of such a system or utii_t`. has already commenced or completed in other areas of the city. The council ..., :� require that such tines be constructed outside the area bein-, pl.:tted or su`. livided *,here necessary in order to properly' serve the area hein,- sucdiviu�,'. .: of tted. Two or core owners, subdividers or platters may ento.r into c��ntr• :c :, .'iLh Che city for the improvement of several su.)dlvisions, n.ircota or ? L 1C: C [ "ill?. 3dI111e time u ?hell S1ICh water, sewer or storm Sewer Lines ? :oull�_ n,t, >ti thrnu-:.' .1^ : .:rervo rne. tievor11 :'.reds concerned and could re :l :; :gin_ t`1` he C. nst:.'c tell a5 :1 )CCr1�,Ct. 4E. io 3.58. VARLA" CES rRMr TFE PROVISION ?S OF THIS PART. Whenever the tract to be sub - s`.,: divided or platted _i.i of such unusual size or shape, or is surrounded by s•:ch de- velopment or unusual conditions that the strict application of the requir = -nents containc•.:7 !n this part would result 'n a substantial hardship or injustice, the council imay vary or modify such requirements so that the subdivider is allowed to develop his property in a reasonable manner, but in such a manner that the public welfare and interests of the city and surrounding area are protected and the general intent and spirit of these regulations are preserved. 3.59. P_.«TS -- PREL1'r1I.',1RY APFP,OVAL. Subdivision 1. Submission to Council. Any person wishing to subdivide land in=o building lots, or to dedicate streets, alleys or land for public use or to sub- divide land into building lots together with the dedication or reservation of pub - lic or private streets respectively, shall submit ten (10)' copies of the prelimin- ary sketch plan, preferably black and white prints, to the council before submis- sion of the final plan. Plats containing three lots or less may be exempted by the council from the provisions of this section. Subd. 2. Contents of Submission. The preliminary plan is to be drawn to a scale of not more than 100 feet i:o tl.e inch and shail show (1) The location of present property and section lines, streets, buildings, water courses and other existing features within the area to be subdivided, (2) The proposed location and width of streets, lots, buildings, and set back lines and easements. (3) Existing sanitary and storm s.twers, water mains, culverts and other un- derground structures, within the tract -,r_ immediately adjacent thereto. The lo- cation and size of the nearest water main and sewer or outlet are to be indicated in a general way upon the plat. (4) The title under which the proposed subdivision is to be recorded and the name of the subdivider platting the tract. (5) The names of all adjoining subdivisions or a description of unplatted areas and the layout of their streets. (6) The council may require a contour map to be made, having contour intervals of not more than two feet. (7) North point, seal and date. (8) Plans or written and signed statements regarding the width of all tunes of pavement, location, size and type of sanitary or other sewerage disposal facili- ties, water mains and hydrants or other utilities, storm water drainage facilities and other proposed improvements such as sidewalks, planting and parks and grading of individual lots. Preliminary plans not containing all of the above data will not be approved by the council. Subd. 3. Procedures for Approval. Approval of the preliminary plans shall not constitute an acceptance of the subdivision by the council. One 'copy of the ap- proved preliminary plat, signed by the mayor and the manager, shall be retained in the office of the engineer. One signed copy shall be given to the sublivider. "eceipt of this signed cony shall be authorization for subdivider to nroce•ed 1•iith tae preparation of plans 'ind specifications for the mini:-.ium improvements r uired ..nd -!-,IV the preparation of the final plat. Prior to the construction of -!v 1ri- rruv,2.ent3 required or to the submission of any bond, the subdivider shall = urni:,. t7e council � ;i th all plans, information and other data necessary for said 17prove- :nents. The plans shall be examined by the engineer and Will be submitted f.�r a-o- ^roval li %' the council if in accordance with the requirements of :his code, Tf s,- 97• r proved, a contract will then be prepared s:�t =in; fort?- the conditiors Tender N:hich the improvement will be accomplish-2d, bas -ed tr)cr . the a.,�rovad nlans an;? specifications for this c,ior :. Subd. 4. Additional Reauiremen_ts . The folio * -; r.a additional re uire^ents shall be imposed: (1) Surveys and plans shall be pr _-pared in accordance h•7ith rules and regula- tions established by the enginOer/ retailed construction soecff 'cations aD- prcved by the engineer shall apply to all items of uor <. inc'"ded --n the _r: ;orcv=- ment . (2) The subdivider or develoDer shall furnish estimates of 0— cost of the improvements based upon bids or upon firm price -_s frcm COntracrors, rollouinc the posting of a bond equal to one and one -half times the estimated cos= of the work and the signing of the contract documants. t.-ork on construction may be started. (3) Any and all -costs to be borne by the city or any costs to he paid for by special assessment against property beriefitted. shall be srecifically outlined in the contract documents. 3.60. FINAL APPROVAL OF PLATS. Subdivision 1. Submission to Council. The final plan on tracincr cloth and four prints thereof, together with four copies of any deed restrictions when such are too lengthy to be shown on the plat or plan, and three prints of tie certified plans showing the improvements as built or as they are to be built within the subdivisions shall be submitted to the council. Before approving the final_ plat or plan of all or part of a proposed subdivision, the council will require proof that the improvements and revisions thereof required have beer. satisfactorily C� completed or their construction sec_'re COP.t_aCt and Bond. The 17" T31 ol3t accepted shall cover only that part of the subdivision_ UDGn which all in prove- meats have been completed or secured. Subd. 2. Contents of Submission. The final plat shall s-- c-,.,: (1) The boundary 11 neS Of t ": e area b2iri? Su ^'_V_ced with accurate distances and angles or bearings;. all section lines, and the ral:)es of all adjoining sub- divisions or a descript on of unnlatted areas and layout of th_Fir streets. (2) The lines of all proposed street= and al _eys with their T:;ctil and ;Tames. (3) The accurate outline Of any pi -,�r ('_rt_c7 •' Ci` 's Off--red 'O' for public use, (4) All lot lines and an identification syst._m for all lots and block:,. (5) Building lines and easements for r. i <,hts v r, i o =a dd rar TTblic u services, or utilities with f i_,"urQs (Iir ;T'unsions (6) All dimensions both linear an;l .1tTtfT1'L :ir. rTecessary for IL-)c,,-.in(- 011n(. _t- ies of subdivisions, lots, streets, 111ey ;, ess�me"nts for building-. lines and' o any other areas for public or private use; ti, e '•_iuear dur,ension> e to be c_;- n_ ressed in feet and Oecir.;al -i of :T f :: ;I)!:. (%) ',`_onuiients of iron 1,ire -n--r ' ,'0 - ?n of and t "10 feet in 1 T14 *Cf'. s'T :_i 1 I)e p1.1Ci" ."L __ _ tr_'Ot corIIC'rs _ilc- ,.l in ali- riment in - ;Croce lip'--s. i!: i� :. ;t'l :.'�'t1t .,., :h.i :. ii` _,�T,�i. �" distanc`5 C (3) Name GC . :tli)�'.i� lT. i. ':C:, -'r or otmers or th : (9) i'ri. :ate r_..tT_ .i_" a I'10C rhoulj such UUII�Lrh -- t' Ur. r�2c_';1.11 < ;.T }: 1,n,t a ..) __r- l CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 273 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Reconsideration of Parking Regulations Mayor Law and Councilman Ludeman have requested that an item be scheduled on the September 11, 1978 city council agenda to reconsider the establishment of parking regulations in the 6900 block of Cedar Avenue. At the August 28, 1978 meeting, the council authorized the establishment of "No Parking Anytime" regulations on the west side of Cedar Avenue between 69th Street and Diagonal Boulevard. Respectfully submitted, OA wotwt � - � "' I Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: Public Safety Director Public Works Director Administrative Assistant • K /,4 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 272 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Resolution Authorizing Conveyance of New Ford Town Lots Several weeks ago., the city council authorized the sale of certain city owned lots in the New Ford Town area. The necess- ary legal paperwork for conveyance of these properties to the purchasers is now underway. However, the sale of Lots 21 and 23, in Block 14, has not yet been completed because of some legal questions surrounding the status of the deed to the property. The city attorney has prepared the attached resolution providing for conveyance of the deed to these properties. It is the recommendation of the city attorney, in which I concur, that the city council adopt this resolution authorizing conveyance of the property in accordance with the previously authorized award of bid for sale of the property. Respectfully bmitted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: City Attorney City Clerk Planning & Redevelopment Director i S RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF LOTS 21 AND 23, BLOCK 14, NEW FORD TOWN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that Lots 21 and 23, Block 14, New Ford Town, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, are no longer needed for any public purpose of the city. 2. The mayor and manager are hereby authorized and directed to convey such property to Byron W. McCullagh in furtherance of the sale as previously authorized by this council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , 1978. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk Loren L. Law Mayor 3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 271 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Application for On -Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses, Too Good's Restaurant At the August 28, 1978 city council meeting, the city council set September 11, 1978 as the date for a public hearing on the request for on -sale and Sunday liquor licenses to be issued to Too Good's Restaurant, 1200 E. 78th Street. The application for these liquor licenses was submitted by Mr. David P. Webb, co- chairman and secretary for Wepo, Inc. Mr. Donald E. Pollard, co- chairman; and Mr. Frederick W. Webb, Jr., will also be principals in the proposed operation. The applica- tion has been properly verified by the city clerk in accordance with ordinance requirements. All necessary information has been filed with the application. The application for on -sale and Sunday liquor licenses for Too Good's Restaurant is a new application. On August 28, 1978, the city council approved a special use permit, variance and off - street parking permit to enable Wepo, Inc. to construct the 200 seat Too Good's Restaurant at 1200 E. 78th Street. The present application for liquor licenses is to permit the serving of liq- uor at that restaurant. Application Investigation In accordance with city ordinance req safety director has made an investigation quired by Section 11.06, subdivision 4 of ordinance. A copy of the report from the commenting on the police investigation of application is attached. airements, the public of the information re- the on -sale liquor public safety director this liquor license The report prepared by the public safety department indicates that none of the three principals involved in the proposed Rich- field business have criminal backgrounds. The public safety director has examined the financial statements of the principals and found them to be in order. The public safety department has identified a possible prob- lem relating to the manager of the applicant's establishment. Council Letter No. 271 -2- September 11, 1978 Richfield city ordinance requires that the manager of a' licensed liquor establishment be a Richfield resident. The application submitted by Mr. Webb does not name a resident manager for the proposed restaurant. The applicant has been informed of the ordin- ance requirement that a Richfield resident manage the restaurant. Accountant's Report The on -sale liquor ordinance requires that the applicant file with the city a statement prepared by a certified public account- ant which shows the total gross sales and the total food sales of the preceding 12 -month period. The purpose of obtaining this in- formation is that the state statutes require that the serving of food be a principal part of the business of a restaurant which has an on -sale liquor license, although this statutory requirement does not include a definition of the phrase "principal part of business." The applicant has indicated that the tended to be the primary part of the Too Since the requested license is for a new accountant's statement is not available tion. Health and Safety Regulations serving of food is in- Good's Restaurant business. restaurant, the required for this license applica- Wepo, Inc. is currently finalizing building and site plans for construction of the restaurant at 1200 E. 78th Street. The plann- ing and redevelopment director, fire chief, environmental health director, and chief building inspector, are working with the appli- cant to insure that the proposed operation is in compliance with applicable health and safety laws. In addition, routine environ- mental health inspections and fire prevention inspections will be conducted at the establishment once construction is completed and the restaurant opens for business. Off- Street Parking Contract Revisions The city council on August 28, 1978 approved an off-street parking contract for Too Good's Restaurant. The approved off - street parking contract includes a variance to the required 15- foot setback to permit additional parking spaces to those exist- ing on the site, and will meet the city requirements for off - street parking. Recommendation It is recommended that the application for an on -sale and Sunday liquor license for Wepo, Inc. to do business as Too Good's Restaurant, 1200 East 78th Street, be granted and issued subject to the following provision: Council Letter No. 271 -2- September 11, 1978 1. That the applicant designate a Richfield resident as manager of the restaurant in compliance with city ordinance. Respectfully submitted, S . �" Chi Wayne S. Burggraaff ' City Manager WSB /eja cc: Environmental Health Director Deputy City Clerk Public Safety Director Public Works Director .. M E M O R A N D U M Date: August 29, 1978 To: Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager From: Thomas A. Morgan, Jr. Director of Public Safety Subject: LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION TOO GOOD'S RESTAURANT Pursuant to the provisions of city ordinance code 11.06, we have conducted the required background investigations relative to the application for a liquor license for Too Good's restaurant which has been proposed to be located at 1200 East 78th Street. The restaurant will be operated by Wepo, Inc. of Richfield which will be a subsidiary of Wepo, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. The parent corporation is currently registered with the Minnesota Secretary of State and authorized to operate in Minnesota with the following officers: Donald E. Pollard, Co- Chairman; David P. Webb, Co- Chairman and Secretary. The proposed restaurant corporation for Richfield will have the above two parties as officers. Additionally, a Frederick W. Webb, Jr. will also be a principal in the proposed Richfield operation. We have conducted the required criminal background checks on all three parties and have found no criminal history backgrounds. We have also examined the financial statements of the principals and find them to be in order. We further believe that the financial statements indicate adequate resources to finance the proposed Richfield operation. We have also looked into the experience of other restaurants operated by this corporation. These include the Original Pancake House in Edina and the My Pie restaurants in Golden Valley, Minnesotai Boulder, Colorado and Norwalk, Connecticut. In our contacts with the jurisdictions in which each of these businesses is located, we have found no indication of problems created by the business activity within these communities. The only concern remaining with the application, as far as the Public Safety Department is concerned, involves the fact that a resident manager has not been named for the proposed Richfield operation. Additionally, we do have some concern about the increased volume of traffic that will be created in a predominately residential area by the operation of this business. However, based on the traffic studies done by the applicant, it would not appear that the increased traffic will create a major public safety hazard. Exclusive of the two concerns mentioned above, there would not appear to be a basis, from the standpoint of the Public Safety Department, to deny this license application. lrrh TAM/ go CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Council Letter No. 270 Agenda September 11, 1978 Subject: Commercial Planned Unit Development Rezoning United National Superblock Area, Second Reading (to be deferred) The principal applicant for the Commercial Planned-Unit Development rezoning in the block of the Hub Shopping Center has advised us that the PUD will be unable to be finalized by the September 11, 1978 city council meeting. Therefore, it is recommended that the hearing on this item be continued to the September 25, 1978 meeting. Respectful \lily submitted, Atv'41- V - f� Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: City Clerk Planning & Redevelopment Director /' CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 269 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Amendment to Year IV Community Block Grant•Budget The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development recently approved Richfield's Year IV (August, 1978 through July, 1979) Community Block Grant application as part of the Hennepin County entitlement grant. However, the funds to be received by Richfield have been reduced and it is, therefore, necessary to propose an amendment in the city's Year IV budget. The reduction in the city's Year IV funds is due to an over- all reduction in the amount of money-received in the Hennepin County entitlement grant. That reduction is due in turn to the fact that more counties in the country have become eligible to receive urban county entitlement grants and the limited appropri- ation must, therefore, be spread over a greater number of partici- pants. The City of Richfield's grant request for Year IV was in the amount of $361,692. The approved application amounted to $328,076. Therefore, it is necessary for the city council to amend the Year IV community block grant budget to reflect this $33,616 reduction. It is the recommendation of the planning and redevelopment director that the budget be amended as follows: Planning Land Acquisition Housing Rehabilitation Park Development Total Existing Recommended Budget Budget $ 51,692 $ 51,692 100,000 100,000 110,000 76, 384 100,000 100,000 $361,692 $328,076 This budget proposes that funding be cut from the housing r- habilitation program. However, it is anticipated that this decrease will not reduce the service level of the rehabilit- programs. A portion of the community development rehabilit funds are to be used for a Home Security Program, in which detectors, solid core doors and deadbolt locks will be ins in low and moderate income homes. By using YES for Rehah to do the installation of these materials, the same numb, homeowners can be assisted. The savings on installatior c Council Letter No. 269 -2- September 11, 1978 should cover the $33,616 funding reduction. The YES for Rehab Program is funded by CETA for labor costs, and the community development block grant program for material costs. Although this CETA program was scheduled to terminate on September 30, 1978, Hennepin County has recently indicated that a new CETA grant request which we are currently filing will make it possible to continue the YES for Rehab project through at least January 31, 1979. Since Year IV of the block grant program runs from August, 1978 through July, 1979, continuation of CETA fund- ing for YES for Rehab through January should enable completion of most rehab work planned for the'Home Security Program. The county has also indicated that a reduced level of funding may be available through CETA to support this program even beyond January 31, 1979. It is recommended.'that the city council approve this amended budget and authorize the city manager to file it with Hennepin County. Respectfully submitted, Olay"e' S. hurg Taff City Manager WSB /eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director Finance Director Park and Recreation Director Public Safety Director 0 Z�l I /a- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 268 Agenda September 11, 1978 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Gentlemen: Subject: Request for Off-Street Parking Contract, 7715 Fourth Avenue Lamont Jankard, 7715 Fourth Avenue, has applied for per- mission to establish an off - street parking lot at this address. The applicant is planning to use part of his existing single family residence at that address for a beauty salon. This residence and beauty salon business is located in a general industrial zoning district where it is a permitted use. The property is bounded on the south by Richfield Plumbing Company and on the north by a multiple residence. The proposal submitted by the applicant provides for a driveway access from Fourth Avenue and four parking spaces to be constructed parallel to Fourth Avenue facing south. The public works director has reviewed this application to assure compliance by the applicant of all ordinance provisions regulating off-street parking contracts. It is his recommenda- tion, in which I concur, that the city council approve execution of this off - street parking contract with the stipulation that the north side of the proposed parking lot be screened with shrubs and /or fencing. Iespectfully bmitted, Wayne S. Burggraaf City Manager WSB /eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director Public Works Director F- f r 18� LU I cur I ;o ai wrox P— 139.40 _ Exlat. �- Green Area Tree Y+ X X 136.7 136.4 X -6136.6 1362 a X<_ (N\drainage I�7 M 12� (_ �� I 91 xy n Handd w I V Sfal l 13 &s ( Bumper Hedg X ° ° ° curb N F-- walk---A. 136.5 + -* -Exist Trees -y+ t�0' . 1 1q—ramp--­.- � I Srale:I °c3(�' Y Z OZ ~ walk i w m � m f 7715 w Z Shrubbery-, H Z W 0 W m 2 OWNER AND ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: USE: DATE OF APPLICATION; COUNCIL ACTION: NO. PARKING SPACES: Employee —JI Parking Garage Exist. Trees SL OFF STREET PARKING NO. 78 -11 �Exist. Fence Line Lamont Jankard 7715 Fourth Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota West 169.4 feet of the East 600 feet of the North 160 feet of the South 462 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 34, T28N, Range 24W of the 4th Principle Mer.idan. Beauty Salon - first floor Owner's residence - remainder of buildincr August 21, 1.978 September 11, 1978 4 r