12-11-78 agendaC _ , a
4
4�- /7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 360
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Discussion of Resolution Supporting President's
Anti- Inflation Guidelines
At the National League of-Cities meeting in St. Louis last
month, President Carter appealed to local officials to support
his efforts-to control wages and prices, not only by conforming
with the voluntary wage ceiling, but also by refraining from pur-
chasing goods and services from firms that fail to comply with the
wage price guidelines.
Mayor Law and I have discussed the President's request and
believe it should be discussed at -the December 11, 1978 city council
meeting. A tentative resolution indicating Richfield's support
for the President's wage and price guidelines is attached for dis-
cussion purposes.
WSB /eja
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraa f
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION INDICATING RICHFIELD'S
SUPPORT FOR THE PRESIDENT'S
WAGE AND PRICE GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, the President of the United States has issued
guidelines for wage and price controls, and
WHEREAS, the President has requested that both public and
private organizations voluntarily comply with these wage and
price guidelines in an effort to control inflation, and
WHEREAS, the President has suggested that local governments
support these efforts to reduce inflation by refraining from
purchasing goods and services from firms that fail to certify
their compliance with the President's wage -price guidelines,.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield that the City of Richfield shall, where
permitted by law, refrain from purchasing goods and services
from any firm that fails to certify their compliance with the
President's wage price guidelines, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is directed
to advise vendors doing business with the city of this policy
and to forward this resolution to the President as an indication
of Richfield's effort to comply with the voluntary wage and
price guidelines.
Passed at the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day
of December, 1978.
Loren L. Law Ilayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
e
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 359
Agenda December 11, 1978
Subject: Setting Date of Public Hearing, L /H /N
Boundary Change
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority has referred a prop-
osed amendment to the L /H /N project area boundaries to the city
council for a public hearing and council action. The HRA's re-
ferral is a necessary step in amending the project area boundaries.
The planning commission has reviewed the proposed boundary change
and has rendered a resolution in favor of the proposed boundary
change. As required by state statute, the next step in the process
is for the city council to set the date of public hearing.
Because proposed changes in state law will probably make the
boundary change more difficult in the future, the city council
should hold its public hearing as soon as possible. If the bound-
ary is changed before the state law is changed, the actions of the
HRA will be governed by existing law. If the boundary is amended
after the state law is changed, the impact on the balance of the
project is uncertain.
It is recommended that the city council set December 26, 1978
as the date for the public hearing on the L /H /N boundary change.
Respectfully submitted,
I&-,iw �. t t
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /ej a
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
EMERSON AVE.
qt' fo
\ i �J LYN WOOD1 - DOPONT
COLFAX "I'.
41, m f
r" O Z �� ^p�E — �IIiJI� RRYANT A E.. -- -- _
ALDRICH AVE.
l
a°
/!\ a _
6 C f
GAR_EIEL�AVE i
- -__ AVE
rt�p
V GRAND AVE.
_.__ -
PLEASANT AVE. --
N
• �J
PILLS BURY AVE. �
CD
>m0 Z I •', WENTWORTH AVE. {
D
{ 1 a
— c ; - - - --
4
QO I - -t- -L- - -1 BLAISDELL AVE.�1- i't•'1
or
m NICOLLET AVE ( \
ai
_
c - --
o -
-- - -y-
DSTEVE AVE.
2.d AVE.
o # LYNDALE /HUB/ NICOLLET
COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT
4 PROGRAM RICHFIELD, MN
� I�
RESOLUTION NO. 20
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, PRESENTING THE OPINION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON AMENDING THE BOUNDARIES
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ENTITLED
"LYNDALE- HUB- NICOLLET COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM"
DATED OCTOBER 15, 1975
WHEREAS, it has been the intent and desire of the City of
Richfield for many years to improve conditions in the section
of the City of Richfield referred to as the Lyndale- Hub - Nicollet
commercial area; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield,
Minnesota (the "Authority "), has adopted- a-redevelonment plan
for an urban renewal project for the Lyndale- Hub - Nicollet area of
Richfield, Minnesota (the "Project Area "), entitled "Lyndale -Hub-
Nicollet Commercial Improvement Program ", dated October 15, 1975
(the "Plan "); and
WHEREAS, the Plan has been prepared by the Authority with the
cooperation and assistance of the appropriate City departments; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has now transmitted an amendment to the
Plan to the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield for its
study, and has requested the written opinion of the Planning Commis-
sion on the amendment to the Plan, all pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
462.515; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has now studied and considered
said Plan amendment for a boundary change to include Lots 15, 16,
17 and 18 Fairwood Shores Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, That, having studied and considered the
amended Plan boundary change, the Planning Commission, by this reso-
lution, advised the City Council, the Authority, and all interested
persons, that it is the opinion of the Planning Commission that:
1. The amended Plan boundary change provides an outline for
the development and redevelopment of the Project Area's additional
area is sufficiently complete to indicate the relationship of the
Plan amendments to the objectives of the City of Richfield as to
appropriate land uses within the Project Area, and to indicate the
general land uses and general standards of development or redevelop-
ment within the Project Area's additional area;
2. The Project Area is a deteriorated and deteriorating area
within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes 462.421, Subd, 11;
3. The urban renewal project proposed by the Plan is necessary
--r,o eliminate, and prevent the spread of, such deterioration;
-2-
4. The Project Area is subject to conditions preventing pri-
vate development and would not be made available for redevelopment
without the governmental assistance and financial aid proposed by
the Plan;
5. The Plan amendments affords maximum opportunity for
redevelopment of the Project Area by private enterprise, consistent
with the sound needs of the locality as a whole;
6. The objectives and purposes of the Plan conform to and are
consistent with the general land use proposals and planning objec-
tives previously, from time to time, established by the Planning
Commission of the City of Richfield for the development of the
Project Area;
7. The Plan amendment should be approved by_the Authority -and
the City Co:uncil_of..Richfield; Minnesota, and be implemented and
carried out as;_s0on,as possible.
DULY ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD,
MINNESOTA THIS 28th day of November, 1978.
Jo p Er
C irman
/71
JyVan Helmberger Herbert Ketcham
ecretary Vice - Chairman
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 358
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Purchases in Excess of $1,000
Chapter VI, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that
the city council must approve purchase of merchandise, materials,
equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1,000. There
are four such items on the December 11, 1978 city council agenda.
Paging Units
The revised 1978 fire division budget provides for the pur-
chase of 25 radio paging units to be issued to the "volunteer"
firefighter reserve. These units are available through December
31, 1978 through Hennepin County, and are identical to the units
currently in use by the public safety department.
Because of the importance of having paging units for the
volunteer personnel compatible with the existing public safety
radio equipment, and because the prices will increase substantially
after January 1, 1979, it is advantageous to the city to purchase
all 25 paging units at this time before the county option termin-
ates.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the public safety
director, in which I concur, that the city council authorize the
purchase of 25 radio paging units for the fire division at a cost
of $278 each, or a total purchase cost of $6,950.
Rnrnlc qal+-
The Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Association has
received bids for the purchase of rock salt, used in our winter
snow removal program. The low bid was submitted by Cargill, Inc.
It is recommended that the city council approve a purchase
in excess of $1,000 in the amount of $2,057, for the purchase of
1100 tons of rock salt to be used in our 1978 /79 winter snow
removal program.
Council Letter No. 358 -2- December 11, 1978
Installation Of Accelator Track
At the city council meeting of November 14, 1977, the city
council approved purchase of a replacement circular track for
the accelator at our water treatment plant. The track and com-
ponents have now been received and are ready for installation.
The water division has received estimates from two companies
that specialize in installation of this equipment. Industrial
Machinery Service, Inc., at an hourly rate not to exceed a total
of $3,800-, and Lovegreen Industrial Service, Inc. at an hourly
rate not to exceed a total of $5,000. Funds for the installation
of this equipment are available in the water division budget.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the public works
director, in which I concur, that the city council approve the
proposal of.Industrial Machinery Service, Inc. Minneapolis, MN.
for the complete track installation in the amount not to exceed
$3,800.
Vehicles
One of the major items Richfield purchases through the Henn-
epin County Joint Purchasing Program each year is vehicles. Henn-
epin County has now received bids for pool cars and public safety
patrol vehicles for some 17 municipalities, and Richfield's 1979
patrol and pool car needs are included in that bid. The 1979
central garage budget provides for the purchase of 8 public safety
and two pool cars, all of which will be replacements for fully
depreciated vehicles in the central garage revolving fund.
The public safety and public works departments in 1979 plan
to continue with the program of utilizing compact size automo-
biles. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the public safety
director and the public works director, in which I concur, that
the city council authorize the purchase of ten compact sedans.
These vehicles will replace patrol and pool car vehicles currently
owned by the city which have accumulated substantial mileage or
wear in city use. Each of the vehicles being replaced will be
sold at a Hennepin County auction in the spring of 1979, to obtain
a maximum investment return per vehicle.
It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase
of ten. vehicles in the amount of $64,210.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. BurggraafV=
City Manager
WSB /ej a
cc: Finance Director
Public Safety Director
Public Works Director
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Council Letter No. 357
Agenda December 11,1978
Subject: Minutes, Tabulation of Bids and Award of
Contract for Central Garage Gas Pumps and
Storage Tank
On December 1, 1978, the acting city manager opened bids
for the installation of gas pumps and tank at the central garage,
in accordance with previous city council authorization. The public
works director, environmental health director and city clerk were
also present at this bid opening. The bid minutes and tabulation
are attached for city council review.
Three bids were received, from Zahl Equipment Company, in
the amount of $19,224; from Pump and Meter Services, Inc. in the
amount of $24,834; and from Northwest Service Station Equipment
Company, in the amount of $18,473.
It is the recommendation of the public works director, in
which I concur, that the city council approve the bid of Northwest
Service Station Equipment Company, Minneapolis, in the amount of
$18,473, for the installation of gas pumps and.storage tank at the
central garage. Funds are available in the central garage im-
provement project fund for this work.
Respectfully bmitted,
k 6t?-X
Wayne S. Burggraaf 'f
City Manager
WSB /eja �o 4k VS
cc: City Clerk Keur j&^^ q
Public Works Director ekVJ taa k
�t /
h 'n
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Bid Opening
December 11, 1978
Gasoline Tank and Pumps
City Project No. 692
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative
staff was called by Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager, who announced that the
purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the
installation of gasoline storage tank and pumps and all appurtenant work as
advertised in the official newspaper on November 22, 1978.
Present: Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager
Carl Marinics, Public Works Director
I. Roesler, Environmental Health Director
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
BIDDER AND
BID SECURITY TOTAL BID ALTERNATE
Pump and Meter Service, Inc.
B B 5% $24,834.00 $21,723.00
Zahl Equipment Co.
Cert. Check $961.20 $19,224.00 $16,707.00
Northwest Service Station Equipment
B B 5% $18,473.00 $15,772.00
The Acting City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and
considered at the regular council meeting of December 11, 1978.
omas J. Moran City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 356
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Commercial Planned Unit Development -
United National Superblock. Second
Reading
United National Corporation, the principal applicant for
the commercial planned unit development rezoning in the block
of the Hub Shopping Center, has advised that the PUD will not
be finalized by the December 11, 1978 meeting. They have
requested that the hearing on this item be continued to the
December 26, 1978 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: City Clerk
Planning & Redevelopment Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 355
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Dates of Hearing for Renewal
Liquor License
The municipal code requires that the city
date for a hearing on applications for renewal
licenses. Notice of any hearing dates must be
official newspaper at least ten days in advanc,
ing.
of On -Sale
council set the
of on -sale liquor
published in the
of such a hear-
It is recommended that a public - hearing be scheduled for
the December 26, 1978 city council meeting to consider the renew -
al of on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses for the Godfather, Inc.
and for the Left Guard Corporation,, dba Maximillans and Chi Chis.
Respectfully s mitted,
�vw
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja 6 -
cc: City Clerk
Public Safety Director
Environmental Health Director
0 _ _1
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 354
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for 'Special Use Permit, Canopy
Variance and Off- Street Parking Permit
fora Service Station Store, 2913 West
66th Street
Super America is proposing to remove a vacant existing ser-
vice station building at 2913 West 66th Street and construct a
new service station store. The size of the new building will be
41.33 feet by 61.33 feet (2,534.76 square feet). The lot size is
1.29.7 feet by 150 feet (19,455 square feet). The building will
be a one -story structure faced with brick and aggregate. The
applicant is also proposing to construct a 30 -foot by 71 foot
freestanding canopy over the gasoline pump islands along 66th
Street. Facing materials on the canopy will be the same as the
facing used on the building. Parking space for 14 cars will be
provided on the site. The following items are attached to this
letter:
Site plan
Building and canopy elevation drawings
Traffic study
Zoning map
Land use map
Comprehensive plan map
Conditions for Issuing a Special
Use Permit
Drainage plan
Lighting plan
Condensor baffling
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
Section 3.33, subdivision 2 of the zoning ordinance requires
that service station stores must obtain special use permits before
locating in C -2 general commercial zoning districts. Section 3.33,
subdivision 3 lists standards which gasoline service station stores
must meet to obtain a special use permit.
Section 3.33, subdivision 6(2) lists standards which service
station canopies must meet.
Council Letter No. 354 -2- December 11, 1978
Section 3.41, subdivision 5 of the zoning ordinance requires
that it must be found that a gasoline service station store is not
detrimental to the public welfare before a special use permit can
be issued.
The applicants are requesting a special use permit and a var-
iance to the standards for a.service station canopy to permit con-
struction of a free standing canopy.
Staff Findings
The staff has found,the following with regard to this propos-
al:
1. The gasoline service station store would be in compliance
with the use criteria of the comprehensive plan.
.2. The gasoline service station store would not be in
compliance with the density requirements of the compre-
hensive plan. The proposed use would not reduce the
existing density of development which has already been
established on the site by the previous service station.
The comprehensive plan calls for medium to high density
use.
3. The service station store meets the standards for gasoline
service stores except for the requirement that canopies
be designed as an integral part of the main building.
The applicant is requesting a variance to this require-
ment.
4. Suff icient.off- street parking spaces will be provided
to meet the needs of the proposed use.
5... Traffic circulation on the.site will be simplified by
the closure of the western most curb cut on 66th
Street. Driving aisles and driveways are of sufficient
width to allow safe traffic circulation. The parking
area circulation will not conflict with the traffic
using the gasoline pumps.
6. The proposed use will not result in a.significant in-
crease in traffic congestion on surrounding streets.
The existing traffic congestion in the area is great due
to the high traffic volumes, intense commercial develop -
ment in the area, and the great number of driveway en-
trances. The existing traffic volume on 66th Street of
18,800 ADT indicates that the street is being used at
its capacity. The traffic study conducted by the
applicant indicates that the traffic added to the surround -
ing street system by the proposed development will not
cause a noticeable change in traffic flow conditions.
The study indicates the development will increase exist-
ing traffic by two to three percent. This estimate
would be high because a portion of the users would
Council Letter No. 354 -3- December 11, 1978
probably already be in the area and not be there
solely.to use the Super America station. A study
conducted by the Illinois section of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers indicates that 54 -58
percent of the users of service stations are al-
ready in the area on their way to another destination.
The increase in traffic due to the proposal would
probably not be significant in this case because it
is replacing a similar use. The applicants will also
be closing one of the existing driveway entrances
into the site, which will have a positive effect on
existing congestion on 66th Street by eliminating one
source of conflicting turning movements. The site
could be developed for other commercial uses which
would generate less traffic, however.
7. The service station store would not have a detrimental
effect on surrounding residences. A six foot fence and
a three foot hedge will be provided along the south
edge of the property to screen the service station
store from surrounding residences. A three foot high
berm will be provided along Washburn Avenue to screen
surrounding residences from automobile headlights.
Site drainage problems will be corrected to insure
that water drains toward 66th Street and not towards
the residences south of the site. The compressor will
be baffled to reduce noise and lighting will be directed
away from the residences.
8. The proposed development will have a positive effect
on the appearance of the site and the area. This is
important in a highly visible area such as this be-
cause it helps create a positive image of the community.
-Staff Findings, Variance
Section 3.40, subdivision 6 of the zoning ordinance sets forth
three conditions which must be present on a site if a variance is
to be granted. The city council must find that all three conditions
are present in order for the variance to be granted.
The staff has reviewed the request for variance against these
conditions and found the following:
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions
affecting the particilar land, building or use referred
to in the application not common to other properties in
this district or similar districts.
It is the staff's opinion that there are no special conditions
present on the site. The proposal involves the construction of
both the building and the canopy. Construction of an integral
canopy is possible. There are no site size, site shape, building
location or canopy location restrictions which prevent an integral
canopy from being constructed.
M
Council Letter No. 354 -4-
December 11, 1978
2. That the granting of the application is ncesssary
for preservation and enjoyment of substantial property
rights
It is the opinion of the staff that the variance is not
necessary to protect the applicant's property rights. Denial of
the variance would not prevent the applicant from using the property
for a gasoline service station, service station store or other
commercial use.
3. That the
or adversely
or working in
cant and will
welfare or in
neighborhood.
jranting of the a
affect the health
the neighborhood
not be materiall
furious to proper
pplication will not materially
and safety of persons residin
of the property of the appli-
y detrimental to the public
ty or improvements in the
It is the opinion of the staff that the proposed would not be
detrimental to the public welfare. It would not interfere with
visibility and would present an aesthetic appearance. The canopy
would be similar.in appearance to the existing Super America canopy
at 826 West 66th Street. It would have brick covered columns and
aggregate panel facia material. One of the intents of the ordinance
requirement for integral canopies is to insure that the canopies
relate well to the buildings on the site. The proposed canopy
would fulfull that intent by using materials which are similar to
the materials used in the building.
Staff Findings, Off- Street Parking Permit
It is the finding of the staff that the parking area will
meet all ordinance standards for parking lots.
Conclusions
The staff has reached the following conclusions:
1. That the proposed development will not be detrimental
to the public welfare.
2. That the request for variance does not meet the three
conditions necessary for issuance of a variance.
3. That the parking area will meet all ordinance standards
for parking lots.
Staff Recommendations.
1. It is the recommendation of the staff that the special
use permit be issued with the following stipulations:
A. That a 3 -foot high earth berm be constructed
along Washburn Avenue to screen residences
from headlights..
B. That the site drain toward 66th Street to help
prevent flooding of the property to the south
of the site and that the final drainage plan be
approved by the public works director.
L
Council Letter No. 354
-5-
Dece ber 11, 1978
C. That the illumination of all lighting on the
site not exceed one foot candle at any property
line.
D. That hours of operation be 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
except on Fridays and Saturdays when hours shall
be 6:00 a.m. to 12 :00 p.m.
E. That the outside condensors be adequately baffled
to limit noise. Baffling methods to be approved
by the Environmental health director.
F. That no outside storage be permitted.
G. That the applicant pay for placement of one -way
signs on the alley adjacent to the site to prevent
traffic from shortcutting through the alley.
H. That drainage and lighting plans be approved by
.the public works director.
2. That the variance not be issued because the three con -
ditions for issuing a variance have not been met.
3. That the off - street parking permit be issued.
Planninq Commission Recommendations
The planning commission reviewed this matter at their November
28, 1978 meeting. It.is the recommendation of the planning
commission that the special use permit and variance be issued with
the stipulations indicated in the staff recommendations. Five area
residents appeared before the commission with concerns about the
proposed development. A petition and list of stipulations were
presented to the commission by these residents (copy attached).
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraa
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
Planning & Redevelopment Director
Environmental Health Director
f ti
r +
r�J' fjl: 'ilJ'� •S1� / k 5
1 t1t� ra
a♦ A,
( �Z?",�'?'
-•,�� cwt -+!,
�C� �7�-'jr t•� t r f t �I � cr -- ie..: >� J 4 ty of
$�
� l
-
^{" �flk�tr - 4 Ply {i
lkti C 1
it
E i11 {{ L F
`•, y +��. �� Iru r 1 stir �il
'� r ♦ /! J i❑ �l t'Ir ! tity $ i'-f ., JY -
{ ff
rt r' t �w
- if^ �� �.lyt "jH L'�� ��S�E � •� Irt #�t�? Y \. ;} �y �'`:.... - N�
w�ri i JiYj9i jril� 4vy i T6'jw •�
l.4 Ir {fir t3��d i r-
��4 + S]..4 6 T•yr � i II !??" 'Si c^ t - �7i� t +'
,%"� � '�,'�r f' Y' ✓ li� 11( I M f Y i!`L �'.v� •Y - t
��' ;7�� ,q�� "+r.,�tr �•r'•�Z, i I;,: � f rt:. i t.��/jii��1�;;•,L3'
;��'fil`•sk "�iN�� e 4- r t:., i i '� � r1. '(F s '�;;r�s�•tii`� .:�'�- -
+- •'t� �. �i•��'r�.r I { 1 ,_i_.__' �f.x "4 °Y r �� v.•. +^ Cif
yW
•��0 J.
�fti �.'.1�s^rt�M✓' � + 1 ` - f :� ( {I '.Z J, '�y�j��'.`�u�+•k j�. { f f
14 i,,{�1'. h�r`� •t - 11�jj, 7p - ( �s'4jJ .r— ✓•r f. �'
` �i��'a`'y(��,r�x�:" f / t �t• � I {j �d'! �ifY�. r= I __ .,. � 1�Y r '��„'xft 3? � � ;
�'rye,��r)��.r' � `�T �' 1� � "���a_� �j1 aSi��� "y ,fir {•ty. fxy x �-
.��- •�.-A.
.¢.Y�
.r ppkSr�tr l '
w'"��(�r�}`r'+f, %•+�rL� - x rli� �J1�� I - ':, >c' }a r� °, fly r...5 ri�'
It 'f��� 7' ; y�C t ^`.. I i jl S ��� I :t ^ 3" try � �" •,.fir
•w t �1�" `�.�yt 9'J f '� 7� � - � r 5 .j't � f 7' - L•., A\ ,
�t �,mot
�� J = � � � . _ .r1 S-7i ���r J � yam• y C � � e ��: +
r � t < .t y +- .JS.'.irYiy�4d "iV h~ r - ^ .v _. � k �+ •K' t f
z cc z
UJ: ir n
w <
0
LLJ LLA m S"
W X to
T.
w
z �:
co
"OS 'EIAV NunSHSV/)A
t.
cy
Al
l w
z
(1)
W
tt
all
-17
cy
Al
tJ
ILL
-41 F I
oo
t 10 —4
-71-7
Z Z
X:3
71
It
vI
I=
----------
tJ
ILL
-41 F I
oo
t 10 —4
-71-7
Z Z
X:3
71
It
vI
I=
1 14
i_.
Wd
QQ
VI
41
J
tj
iI
m
FT
QQ
VI
41
J
tj
iI
m
. .
-^
' ---------- '-4��
'
^�
`
`
`
�
--/
u \
/
!
�|
!
i
'
�
/
/
�
'.
.i
'.
)'
/
!
/
'
`
_
�
!
�
!�
.'
�
Zoning Map
tai #'M v;
ti
y
�.
tu
PAW
aAvf —
n 7
.;'L• rA Site
.� f? ,.;TRAM'
Fill
' - --
.. •. F • ,aj'i 10 �. "L '.:i° sY i }� s ' �- ly`', '� ,,,� .a . ; v, � '} �i
T
r v
3
]jji((i 6„Jbi A •.{ 3�d 6
J3 1{ t MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
LIMITED BUSINESS -
v5x , M �AO ,
� . Ltd � • �- ♦ v l _ .- v � � i
0 30
N
0
LJ
i '2 J�Z4L d
> N a 14
M
n
CL
• .l:6♦
w 'z
PUBLIC 3
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
µ
MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL }
COMMERCIAL
V*
v
r
rf
f.
t
�R
-
4TRACT 8
N
0
LJ
i '2 J�Z4L d
> N a 14
M
n
CL
• .l:6♦
w 'z
PUBLIC 3
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
µ
MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL }
COMMERCIAL
uJ
N
0
LJ
i '2 J�Z4L d
> N a 14
M
n
CL
• .l:6♦
w 'z
PUBLIC 3
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
µ
MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL }
COMMERCIAL
�wxxaA-
I
All-
-I—
A-1 E
:T.— I
E
:11TI" III
'I -E
11-1— All
E
E.
—D
Ill— —E
--T
-E
All
'Nm
N,
IE—T
—11IT .1
77--
WE
C
-E
77-
v
(1) Undertaking establishments
r (2) Any drive -in business where people are served in automobiles
(3) Automobile camps and courts
(4) Hotels, motels, restaurants, cafes, gasoline service stations,
service station stores, public garages, _car sales lots and theaters. No
service station may be converted into a station store without a special
use permit for such use issued in accordance with Section 3.41 of this code.
-.(Bill 1973 -21) 2/11/74
(5) Other business uses which are determined by the Council to be of the
same general character as the uses enumerated in this section and which will
not be obnoxious or detrimental to the area in which thev would be located.
Subd. 3. Regulations Relating to Gasoline Service Stations, Public Gara ^es
and Car Sales Lots. A special use permit for a gasoline service station, a
public garage or a car sales lot shall not be granted unless the council finds
that the proposed use will be in substantial compliance with the following
standards:
(a) The use site will not abut a lot which is in an "R" district.
For the purposes of this paragraph, a lot which merely adjoins the use site
at one corner will not be deemed to abut the site.
(b) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic con -
gestion by reason of the turning movements which vehicles would make in
entering or leaving the site.
(c) No driveway, at the point it crosses the property line of the
site will be within 40 feet of an intersection. An "intersection" as used
{ in this paragraph means the point of intersection of the extended curb lines
if the curbs on the near side of the site, and measurement shall be along
such extended curb lines.
(d) The station or garage will not display any banners, noisy
ribbons or similar attention - distracting or visibility - obscuring devices
in the area in front of building setback lines.
(e) The minimum frontage on any street will be 120 feet and the
minimum area of the site will be 12,000 square feet for a station with four
pumps or less; and stations with more pumps will have sufficient additional
frontage area to provide equivalent and sufficient space for servicing
vehicles, for off - street parking, for safe vehicular approaches into the
station, and for good visibility for pedestrians and drivers.
(f) No driveway will be flared outward on the boulevard in such a
way as to encroach upon the boulevard of adjacent property.
(g) The station or garage will comply with the off - street parking,
sign construction and other regulations of the city.
(h) Any required buffer or screening area will be so constructed as
to obstruct headlight beams of automobiles on the station property from
beaming onto adjacent residential property.
(i) Pump islands will not be so close to street or adjacent property
lines as to create the likelihood of encroachment by vehicles upon street
right -of -way, sidewalk areas or adjacent property.
(j) Only one permanent detaclicd ground display si=gn, pedestal type
may be erected on the street frontage at or near the property lire adjacent
to the street, except that if the frontage on the street is in excess of
150 feet, two such si=ns may be allowed by the council on such frontage,
subject to any other applicable sign re'-Ulations. (Blill 1970 -10) 3/23'70
3/23/70
ORDINANCE CODE 68 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
(k) All exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated
as not to be a nuisance to adjacent properties.
(1) If the station or garage is to be located in a shopping center
or other integrated development, it will be in architectural harmony with
the rest of the center or development.
(m) The station or garage will not provide for the outdoor operation
of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor
display of merchandise; but the outside underground storage of gasoline and
other petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary display of merchan-
dise within 4 feet of the station building is permitted.
(n) If the station or garage is not to be located on a county road
or state highway, it shall not be operated between the hours of 11:00 p.m.
and 6:00 a.m, of the following: day.
(o) If the site is at an intersection, provision will be made for
an unobstructed area on the site, adjacent to and within 50 feet of the in-
tersection, free of vehicles, signs (other than a pedestal sign), displays
or other materials which tend to obstruct intersection visibility.
Subd. 4. Regulations Relating to Hotels, Motels, Restaurants and Cafes.
A special use permit shall not be granted for a hotel, motel, restaurant or
cafe unless the council finds that the proposed use will be in substantial
compliance with the following standards:
(a) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic con-
gestion either on the public streets adjacent to the site or on the parking
areas on or adjacent to the site or on streets adjacent to the site unto
which traffic to or from the site is channeled.
(b) Adequate provision will be made, through the use of building
setbacks, buffer areas, screening, and exterior treatment or placement of
the building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust, and any other
sources.of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent properties.
(c) Adequate provision will be made through the use of building
setbacks, screening, landscaping, exterior design and placement of the
building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust and any other sources
of nuisance or annoyance to users, or patrons of the facility.
(d) Adequate off - street parking space is available for patrons and
employees.
(e) If liquor is to be sold on the premises (1) of the property abuts
upon a main thoroughfare of the cite, (2) access to all off - street parkin`
space is from internal driveway systems and is not directly from public
streets, and (3) provision is made for well- designed vehicular stacking space
allowing for an efficient and orderly flow of traffic from the site onto
adjacent main thoroughfares of the city. "Main thoroughfares of the city ",
as used in this paragraph, means a street designated as a state trunk highway
or a service drive adjacent to the state trunk highway, a state aid highway, a
county aid highway, a county highway, or a street which is so located as to
serve, primarily, commercial development. (Bill 1976 -10) 4/26/70
(f) The proposed facility_ will provide an aesthetic appearance which
will not detract from or conflict with the existing or proposed architectural
form of buildings in the same area.
(g) The use will not create an excessive burden on public parks,
public open - space, streets, or utilities requirint; public services which
are proposed to serve the facility.
4/26 / 76
ORDINANCE CODE 68.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
(h) The proposed development will not conflict with the comprehensive
development plan of the city.
Subd. 5. Height Re "zulations. In a "C -2" district no building shall hereafter
be erected or structurally altered to exceed three stories of 40 feet in
height, subject to the modifications and exceptions provided in Section 3.39
of this chapter.
Subd. 6. Lot Areas and Yard Requirements. (The same requirements shall be
observed for the "C -2" district as are provided for a "C -1" district in
Section 3.32 of this chapter.)
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subdivision the same
minimum'requirements shall be observed for "C -2" district as are pro,:7ided for
a "C -1" district in Section 3.32.
(2) A gasoline service station may construct a canopy extended into the
building setback area of the lot on which it is located provided that such
canopy complies with the following regulations:
(a) It must be designed and constructed to serve as protection for
customers and attendants from inclement weather.
(b) It may extend into the front yard area distance of 10 feet, as
measured from the centerline of the gasoline pump island closest to the street
lot line but in no instance closer than five feet from this lot line.
(c) Only one canopy shall be permitted at each service station, unless
it is located on a corner lot.
(d) It shall be designed and constructed as an integral part of the
main service station building and shall extend from such building.
(e) The canopy shall not be constructed to a height exceeding sixteen
feet.
(f) The canopy shall not be designed for use nor shall it be _tsed as
a location for any business or advertising sign of a permanent or temporary
construction.
(g) Lighting located on the canopy shall be designed as an integral
part of the canopy providing, that fixtures shall not extend below the bottom
surface of the canopy structure and shall be beamed downward.
(h) The canopy shall not be used as the location for lights or
lighting fixtures used to illuminate the service station building, off- street
parking areas or other areas not directly beneath the canopy. Flashing lights
and rotating lights shall not be located on or attached to the canopy.
(i) No canopy, whether it conforms with the foregoing rc,-ulations or
not, shall be constructed in a location or manner which will block or obscure
the vision of automobile traffic on any street adjacent to the service
station or the vision of an automobile entering or leaving the service station.
(Bill 1972 -6) 3/13/72
Subd. 7. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.40 the co: :ncil rant an
exception or an adjustment to any of the requirements of this section where
the council finds that the project encourages a more creative and efficient
approach to the use of land and to environmental desi than is provided cinder
the strict application of the zonin, regulations of the cit-:, provi:;ed L11 .t
the project is consistent with the purposes of such re�_::lations.
(Till 1972 -6) 3/13/72
ORDINANCE CODE
./13/7'
6S 2 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
I
0
SUPERAMERICA
SAINT PAUL PARK, MINNESOTA 55071
November 22, 1978
Mr. Richard Krier
Planning Department
City of Richfield
Richfield, MN
Subject: Proposed Station Store at 66th and Washburn
Dear Mr. Krier:
Pursuant to our conversation of this morning, this letter will
serve to inform you that during the time of construction of the
proposed station, we will change the grades of the site to alle-
viate the drainage problem.
We will drain the site in the directions shown by the dotted
lines on the enclosed drawings - to 66th Street.
We will co- operate with you in every manner possible to alleviate
the flooding problems in this area.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Holt
Architectural Engineer
MDH:mu
___ _. �•- G 1��� •.5��_ -G: _GD-'<`� - [`L%ic"/ - _ice- G�G.i:�' -7 /� .
v
117
tu
I
i
7r
117
tu
I
3 °� 3`L___�
Ii t` W b 167s z� 3 io W s.►y 1 i -
*= �s i �� 4 ?, I X -- - - - -- -- ►���_ h it _:}��_.-
DoT
Petition Map q - -- 3.
Irz - --
W ale s tfbz + u141 -
;.
/
•1�o J
3 Z ^ J
ar
t` a 1z. I ,
�� 1•� 9 NI 1 J.
C 10
3230
t t CF - AQ�4 1+ U{ �, �r C y� 8 Ac
i r1,
325. I 0 3c 35 D I yL , 72.3�. J �i
f : rim 3} -•, _ __ — _- .._ �� 7
66 at Tl � — �-_ n^, _ _ � � C1L&— {
».34io ,.� 55.5• �` `� t -_ �. •'S.j �>'` -3, �. ,.' ' Y^ u� �.
y-• ry "�; Yt ^{
�rtK:Sol0 5�E \N
tSN v �S� 1,.r a i
h o F 0�.
It
- -RACT B
Zj
Z4.76 h' 147'14 .. ie 7T37-
ZOO
M a _
f7l,
Y` O'? IZf N �: • v 10
ww 14 ' a t1 1d 11 1d 4 I1 i
W ` 1� i) a° 1! ' Q '~t . -,? - -- ! - -- 1� - i
? T - G.._�__�� -1
14
ia. - � Lam` -�� ; -4�i4 r ^_ . i� �5 {C'� • I �14. , 1s �1�,. {,�14 art kon
- 12134
i
W. Y 67th.
TT,
i7
'A �t,/:
N Z.L24- 1 a 1�2` r' { Z f •;
1 n
� . '•.: ? °- ! � 11 M 1 ; 4
4
—
cc
LUO
lo�s 1 SIGNATURES ON PETITION
r
C:
SO)
toll i
7 7
- 7 �� I fi� i
tJ
UL
V,.. ZM?- .
A
Z�l
'|r.
�
{
|'
'
!�
|
|
�
^
|
�
! '
|
i
|
�
|
�
/
\
./
^
|
|
'
'|r.
�
{
|'
'
!�
|
|
�
^
|
�
! '
|
i
|
�
|
�
/
\
^
|
|
'
�
|
�
.
,
|
/
/
� [
'
�
�
-v
�
> �
| '
1J.
\ /
\. |
�
/ \
D
�
I
is
11;
tlkl
I�A
t}.
is
�a i
............
SyS
,.;fry.; \\� - ___
-�. -_-
�_- - -' t r �-`
.r;� -.
1=777
t}.
is
�a i
............
SyS
r
,�I
U
L
— `r';r�` ✓VYC Cep
V!7F5PW� �v
is
l !
,�I
U
:�It- 6-
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA -
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 353
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit to Operate
Group Family Day Care, 6921 Xerxes Avenue
Ms. Joan Perry, 6921 Xerxes Avenue, has applied for a license
to operate a group family day care home in her residence. The
residence has a main floor area of 1,346 square feet and a basement
area of 1,008 square feet. The lot size is 50 feet by 133 feet
(6,650 square feet)
Group family day care is defined as a program providing day
care for more than five, but fewer than eleven children at any
one time, including the provider's and helpers' own children under
school age.
Group family day care homes must comply with all requirements
found in State of Minnesota Regulation DPW #2. The operator must
obtain a license through Hennepin County, and a day care operation
for six or fewer children in residential districts requires local
.approval, under state law.
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
The Richfield zoning ordinance does not define a group family
day care home as a specifically permitted use in a single family
residential zoning district. Past city council actions indicate
that group family day care homes have been considered schools.
Section 3.30, subdivision 2 of the zoning ordinance requires
that a special use permit must be obtained before a school can
locate in a single family residential zoning district. Section
3.41, subdivision 5 requires that it be demonstrated that a school
would not be detrimental to the public welfare, before such a
special use permit may be issued.
Staff Findings
The staff has found the following with regard to this proposal:
1. The applicant has applied for a license in accordance
with state regulations.
Council Letter No. 353 -2- December 11, 1978
2. The applicant will meet all standards established
. in state regulation DPW #2.
3. A beneficial community service will be derived
from this type of operation. There is a need
in Richfield for child care facilities.
4. The day care use would not create traffic problems
in the area. The proposed use would generate up to
20 additional trips per day, which is not significant.
There is adequate lot frontage for dropping off
children. There are no driveways onto Xerxes Avenue
in this block, nor are there any land uses fronting
on Xerxes Avenue on the opposite side of the street.
5.. The applicant has two large dogs (Great Danes) which
could pose some safety problems. The dogs create a
possibility of direct physical injury and possible
disease from dog waste in children's outdoor play
areas. The applicant has said that dogs are very
gentle and pose no threat to the children.
6. The applicant has an outdoor swimming pool which could
pose a safety threat to unsupervised children. The pool
is enclosed and the applicant has indicated that the
children will not have access to the pool.
7. The proposed group family day care home would not be
detrimental to the public welfare if precautions are
taken to minimize the dog and pool safety problems.
Staff Recommendation.
It is the recommendation of the staff that the special use
permit be issued with the following stipulations:
1. That the applicant be licensed for a group family
day care.home as required by state regulation DP #2.
2. That all animal waste in the yard be cleaned up daily
and stored in plastic bags in covered containers in
a location not accessible to the children.
3. That all gates be lockable to prevent children from
gaining access to the swimming pool area and the
alley.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission reviewed this matter at its November
28, 1978 meeting. It is the recommendation of the planning
commission that the special use permit be issued with the stipu-
Council Letter No. 353 -3- December 11, 1978
lations described in the staff recommendation.
Respectfully ubmitted,
Wayne S. Burggraa
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director
'
�7� Z%lIi�. �i $��. ?� �`,� � La !� i 1 � `� l ' �l 4 c ' ` r ,�� �. � t � y� r •', � ^(
49f
> �4l �' -Y r� 6 jl, •j �V.p i - -f;� 11ri �j 'Z b^+ / -.,
Zoning • � "�li` x �i A` Y-i'1 - , it�e -:Y i- }t'�i �:�n� � �•� '-
Map
Y -:11���s. '• � �._a.:..:c�. - -1�� �` _ . -s._ ,- �_ +.1��?.'` t- __mac. -__a _ „3c.� � ��S
��'T ��'''_ C 3'i Y `•� ?i � �A' '^- Jr '..i y— �i7- �.:'a, �Y� ��- '��--'t- � w.y�_-�► --�-� 5- -- --;��`v
4.K
IXT
t i �i } $: t � �4A �� 4 ~f aT �-� � 1 s ,S! -�v- �,- � � ��,. � - - oo _•a�” -
:
i -+---- • L� - ..-_.. __ _ _ - '-"`.+ - - �-_,-.-•.c . _ tom"' - -
i
3 ! . ' 1✓r ti
}R
ff 14 a
� i� j • �°�,� 4 � ; G, it � � •:: � v�{aj� J� i l 1 . �t t Q� ;'_ • : � � i � ;,v� yi t � .` J` 1 rti � � �?„
�
t, f
7.1 � �T ?>p <� -,,,r " ' " ^? �����s��" • rT7y� t • s• _ �`�_ � � _
''�k'�:, ♦ 1 ��•� � ^'7 �•x�' � � '�. �& tee' °: '}, 4 f vy� •i �B+!�( �L- aI ats -, � � r ,r �; � { .�
'#� ,.�i ':� ;? -' i'p. i 7'tr - yi.• f - -i A TJ
site
y
11
:
3
Ttth�; .1.3 �'i , "� oI k °i 4• �> �1 s e!
Z '• �i": -� '! - l :__ f•F - s _ ITS �. _ -� P� - s a- ,p - V.
OT 0
}�iL.�:� f. 'd i c� #- J ' ~ �`�+_�' -_ +- =..� '"� ' 1-: �. �_ ._._� �'�1..st��..�•^` ice- r- ., ! .1a_7 ".- i"_`.'�.,,..1r� �`-;.c � �� "' .C, °�j.:�[.'.:.- ,:a•
s -: W e 34
z ,
1
t
0 •6 -� - y0t i
fF-
t,'.
s -: W e 34
0 •6 -� - y0t i
fF-
t,'.
.. � r %ry T
d \?• _'-
t� �J+
e Yt
r V } E C.
? .Y
ti �""`�
y
°. '°S`
iry ^Y
7A:
12 lr3 14-
i
M'1
E T E R v
�.
�.,
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
11 Oc
s -: W e 34
:5 Q j
,A iii
.. � r %ry T
�
e Yt
r V } E C.
1 GJ
yl
12 lr3 14-
M'1
E T E R v
�.
�.,
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
11 Oc
7c •) r) Q)
4 75-7 1
s
y T
4
I'
IT r d.
IG -- �" 9 -
_ �! a
• f. ,' o�� IZ ya
�.J
3 �
' e
zZ. site
'3
r
,a s
8
� 9
15322
�s 6.
Zo. ti
i e
r` 7.4
f7
__115-L
�itL '
, ; 2 �
KSjG•
o
IS
0
14.
.! 1
'3
r
,a s
8
� 9
15322
�s 6.
'iS� t
i e
r` 7.4
�
__115-L
�itL '
, ; 2 �
KSjG•
:{ s: f i5 to
�1
n n
1 Z7
Land Use Map - - -- ,b
.. -Cos T
e / , a 7. a �� !t /Z7. e/t .
,� h Z� a,
It 3. t1. 3 zt o 3
f r
z
d
z
� 12
Z
0
06
151 J�
♦b
1
LL
bA
LL
'$.
, ; 2 �
KSjG•
C'
J
f
a r
West
t s S , , ;PUBLIC
8 i 7 6 j 6 4 3
� - 4
- .� , too ►��� �,�_, {ti q� � +.� �` ,.a� J. ._ . �. ,
12 13 /t !s ! /6 �±
AIA dJ�/4E f�� MULTI - FAMILY REE
��s �9eo `lnn '511 +11"' i 6100
6q }h.
Q
cn
Q
O
L_
UZ
t 4
_ k �+" �J�(.,.�/.v! i�`.5 -, L -4�'t. YL1��� -U ✓�7t- '�-C-�- /may tti ./_- L= iL —C•-, ✓�� -
M- - - - - -- -
y
Cr .L`< CL
��
,_ .: ��t •�f�c� --� �-- �.VC? -�' /_%c,<.�,- i.�<..��c� Gl� �ti.G- -r`� = sl'.ICs�- -cc- -t - -- -
_ _�._ - /�"�f-- - -./�! .i�. � ( ..'l.li� x �'ti' -. �� � _... � �' -'/�'�i,.-.:��- !l_- C•� -tit��� /:_'.��- C....c. c'� --�-�v ,
vr/ u
y�-
£' t 1+ 'P ' ,� �� ' Y%-��(C�,�i ~' (•yL� /� C.- L'a� � � / ' yam/ ZC.i
ter'
UZ
t 4
_ k �+" �J�(.,.�/.v! i�`.5 -, L -4�'t. YL1��� -U ✓�7t- '�-C-�- /may tti ./_- L= iL —C•-, ✓�� -
M- - - - - -- -
y
Cr .L`< CL
��
,_ .: ��t •�f�c� --� �-- �.VC? -�' /_%c,<.�,- i.�<..��c� Gl� �ti.G- -r`� = sl'.ICs�- -cc- -t - -- -
_ _�._ - /�"�f-- - -./�! .i�. � ( ..'l.li� x �'ti' -. �� � _... � �' -'/�'�i,.-.:��- !l_- C•� -tit��� /:_'.��- C....c. c'� --�-�v ,
vr/ u
y�-
£' t 1+ 'P ' ,� �� ' Y%-��(C�,�i ~' (•yL� /� C.- L'a� � � / ' yam/ ZC.i
X.
f ?
—__.
it
n
J
I r ,
K�" .R e � � — ���'L —C� ✓�'ti`, J�- ��- -(:� -�—Y'L l��— {j —r"1"� Gl_'�l. _
6
� '-do- J, �.� �� �! w
cj
-
ILe, ot—T� C ✓��/ c,CGG y� .
CCE
CLt,`LGCu
,
v
v
-� _�. - -�.,.v �GZ.�.w, -✓�.� _ ���- C-a- -Z __���Z�t, _ CtG'? - - -��� - /J ?ct_,D
.�� � "y..J �`� (`max") �,.it�,�(..�. i� - `'���'• --��- c-- �_ -�..� - .`2'lt�. _ . "'�`� =` =L�
cu = t '-Ll�
r
133
39
6� —W wood fence
around pool.
6921 a Pool .. .,
Deck
gore
X� — —
88
4'cyclone fence
k—i
Play
Area
45
1
gate
a
1
Special Use E.K.S.
Group Day Care 12/6/78
4
NI
d
Tc.
Tfl A
�44
Fe C—,
UJI
ri
FAMILY DAY CAR.
Provider Only No helper needed)
Infants Toddlers Preschoolers Tota
No more than 2 infants at any one time.
No more than a combination of 3 infants
and toddlers at any one time.
Two part -tine children may be counted as
one -ful.l -time child if they are not
in care at the same time.
In addition to the licensed capacity,
2 school -age children may be in
.care if:
A. Care is limited to no more than
3 hours per day.
B. An exception to the limit of 2
after school should amount to
no more than 30 days per school
year.—
Infant . . . . . 6 wks. thru 15 mo.
Toddler. . . . . . . . .16 thru 30 mo.
Preschooler. . . . .31 mos. thru 5-yr.
Primary School Child . . 6 thru 8 yrs.
This chart was designed to help you de-
termine the numbers and ages of chil-
dren allowed in care according to DPW
Rule 2
GROUP FAMILY DAY CARE
Provider Only (No helper needed_ Provider and Helper (Full -time helper)
Infants Toddlers Preschoolers Totals
Infants Toddlers Preschoolers Totals
- - 10 10
- - 10 10
- 311 unit 7 10
- 1 9 10
- 2 8 10
2 1 ) 7 10
3 7 10
- 4 6 10
No more than 2 infants at any one time.
- 5 5 10
No more than a combination of 3 infants
- 6 4 10
1 4 5 10
- - - - -- tuuu I C1 a -lL dny one Lime.
Two part -time children may be counted
2 4 limit 4 10
3 3 6 4 10
as one full -time child if they
are not in care at the same time.
4 2 4 10
In addition to the licensed capacity,
2 school -age children may be 'in
No more than 4 infants or six toddlers for
care if:
each provider and helper combination.
A. Care is limited to no more than
No more than a combinat ion of 6 infants and
3 hours per day.
toddlers for each provider and helper.
B. An exception to the limit of 2
combination.
after school should amount to
In addition to the licensed capacity, two
no more than 30 days per school
school -age children per provider may
year.
be in care if:
A. Care is generally limited to no
more than three hours per day
B. Exceptions to this limit amount to
no more than 30 days per school year
pr�iC
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF
FOR PURPOSE OF Da
Asa U
'Legal Description:
We, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above
do hereby concur with the Special Use as requested.
described,
Z Signature- -of ners Legal Description
Address Lej�,
e—C
:_fig. ��;'' ! �• 10 —f r7 h 10_ IS. t0 13 IQ 15 10
"'iii777 0
lllt eh
7LLS Petition IVIa •`
A 014 t4
!l). e!S
n: 3. ti. �^ zz j r2 ) ZZ o j
ZL �,� P4.
1 ` ?� , ,,'�a � S. � Zo. 4 a`� S. 2. ,� a S- Z.. ± i „ S. Z•. � I \; S
9
0 0
7
low
f7 1� Le. R 1 !{ 4 A IT L I .ti A t IT ^
sr
jl 0..
Zi
ib
►1
•�
10 .
15
�'V
1 l
y
57
a
e 3
obi IZ
J
Imo]
I
:.n
!iZ4
=S
a1L_
F ti �
�
I
sr
jl 0..
Zi
ib
►1
•�
♦♦
15
�'V
1 l
y
57
J
:.n
NON
=S
a1L_
F ti �
�
I
" ^
Scs.l•
Q
Q
Q
1..
West-- 70 1/2
9 I
( 9 , 7 6; 5 4 SUPPLEMENT TO
Rt ViSEn UNITE n
l` J # f _ V
, -�' fR ; /9� �a•� ��•• •poi SIGNATURES ON P
,AMA URER s � s PETITION
.�..ar" „s �• 4 i se - •o
� -z♦ai -..•mow �+♦ -� I,.SStI r S�. � � ^3.
3.41. SPECIAL USE PERMITS
Subdivision 1. Issuance. Special use permits may be issued for any of the
following:
(1) Any of the uses or purposes for which such permits are required or
permitted by the provisions of this chapter.
(2) Public utility or public service uses or public building in any district
when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare.
(3) Commercial excavating or natural materials used for building or con-
struction purposes, in any district.
(4) To classify as a conforming use any institutional use existing in any
district at the time of the establishment of such district.
(5) -To permit the location of any of the following uses in a district from
which they are excluded by the provisions of this code: airport, library,
community center, church, hospital and institution of an educational, philan-
thropic or charitable nature, cemetery, crematory, mausoleum or any other place
for the disposal of human dead.
(6) For any use covered by Section 3.35.
Subd. 2. Limitation on Issuance. A special permit may not be issued for the
purpose of granting an adjustment or appeal pursuant to Section 3.40 nor for
any use not authorized for the specific district for which the permit is sought,
nor for any use prohibited in all districts by the provisions of this part.
Subd. 3. Application. Application for the issuance of a special use permit
shall be made to the chief inspector. Any proceedings to classify certain uses
as conforming uses as provided in this section may be initiated either by such
application or by the council.
Subd. 4. Public Hearing. The council may hold such hearings on the proposal
to issue a special use permit as. it may consider necessary; but at least one
public hearing shall be held by the council or by a committee or commission
to be designated by the council in any application for a use permit for the
establishment of any use listed in Subdivision 1, Subsections 5 and 7, of
this section.
Subd. 5. Conditions Governing Issuance. The council shall not grant a permit
for any of the uses enumerated in Subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds that
the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use for which a use permit
is sought will not under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental,
(1) to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or welfare of the persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of such use, or (2) to the public wel-
fare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood.
Subd. 5A. Conditions Governing Issuance of a Special Use Permit in an
Officially Approved Redevelopment Area. The council shall not grant a permit
for any uses enumerated in Subdivision 1 Hereof unless it finds that the es-
tablishment, maintenance or operation of the use for which the permit is sought
is in compliance with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan, with any officiall-,-
adopted redevelopment plans and urban design guidelines thereof, and with the
city's parking regulations and landscape guidelines. (Bill 1978 -1) 2/13/78
2/13/78
ORDINANCE CODE 81 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
i Office of City Manager
C offlrn -e i_�ett ems' No . 352
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Variance to Fence Height
Restriction, 2.805 and 2809 W. 66th Street
On October 23, 1978, the city council approved a special use
permit to enable the Burger King Restaurant at 2800 West 66th
Street to construct a drive -thru service window. At that meeting,
the people of the surrounding neighborhood expressed concern about
traffic, noise and other effects of the restaurant on their homes.
The management of Burger King agreed to take some steps toward re-
.solving those concerns of the neighbors, including constructing
and maintaining a fence along the front of the three properties
- directly across 66th Street from the restaurant.
The applicant wishes to construct five foot high wood verticle
alternating board fences along their front property lines to help
screen their residences from headlights, noise and trash from the
Burger King Restaurant.. However, the applicant at 2805 West 66th
Street would like approval to construct a six -foot high fence, in
case the proposed five -foot high fence does not provide sufficient
screening. The following items are attached to this council letter.
Site Plan
Elevation drawing of fence
Zoning map
Land use map
Letter from Burger King
Public Works Department Comments
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
Section 3.39, subdivision 2 of the zoning ordinance limits
fences in front yards to four feet in height. Because the proposal
is to construct five -foot high fences, a variance to this ordinance
is required. Section 3.40, subdivision 6 of the zoning ordinance
sets forth three conditions which must be present on a site if a
variance is to be granted. The city council must find that all
three conditions are present in order for the variance to be granted.
The staff has reviewed the request for variance against these con -
ditions and found the following:
Council Letter No. 352 -2- December 11, 1978
1. That there are special circumstances or conditions
affecting the particular land, building or use referred
to in the application not common to other properties in
this district or similar districts.
It is the opinion of the staff that there are special conditions
present.on the site. The residences are adjacent to a high volume
street, a commercial zoning district, and a high volume, high
turnover commercial use. This combination of circumstances occurs
only on a very limited basis elsewhere in the city.
2. Tha
It is the opinion of the staff that the variance is necessary to
protect the applicant's property rights. The uses in the area all
conform to existing use regulations. However, past policies and
regulations of the city have allowed the development of now con-
flicting land uses in the area. Residential uses .adjacent to high
volume commercial uses are subjected to many negative impacts, such
as noise, air pollution, headlights,trash, and access problems which
reduce the desirability and value of their property. The applicants
are applying for a variance to allow them to construct a fence to
reduce the negative impacts resulting from the adjacent conflicting
uses in order to protect the value of their property and their right
to enjoy the use of their property.
3. That the
or adversely
or working in
cant and will
welfare or in
neighborhood.
iranting of the a
affect the health
the neighborhood
not be materiall
jurious to proper
oplication will not materially
and safety of persons residing
of the property of the applli-
y detrimental to the public
ty or improvements in the
It is the opinion of the staff that the proposed fences would not
be detrimental to the public welfare if they are set back four feet
from the sidewalk. The fences would not present visibility problems
because no driveways enter onto 66th Street. Fences placed on front
property lines adjacent to sidewalks do not leave sufficient room
for snow storage, which results in increased public cost for snow
removal. A four foot fence setback would provide sufficient snow
storage space.
In Summary, the staff has found that all three conditions for
issuing a variance are met on these sites if the fences are set
back four feet.
Staff Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the staff that the variance be
approved, with the stipulation that the fences be set back four
feet from the sidewalk.
Council Letter No. 352 -3- December 11, 1978
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission considered_ this matter at their
November 28, 1978 meeting. It is the recommendation of the
planning commission that the variances be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
j J
Wayne S. Burggra f
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
Planning & Redevelopment Director
2,501
rtSTI
AIL
i
28��7-
� � 1
1
. . . . . e4
m gzj
Warr 6 NTH sT
4 "iL A W VIES
SC
ko
F1
s" 3 rr
-
Z E.
w''pt zY _tip'
rs
Y
4 .. vi,
'• _ � ��o � t..Jp �lo�� Sr�
s� t _
FENCE. ELEVATION
�* -5 "Lf wz-
2"
REDWOOD VERTICAL ALTERNATING BOARD
Zon
ing Map
(701
1O. W*, 4 ;))u
t.J 4 11 —Pj
J4.6
44
'IV
o5r.
24} c MJ
�
--- xv—
fa
Ax
LL w
A
............. ..........
01�
44.
I f I
cel.
A"
7
r ire
,
S-T--
7 5-1 % T_4CT7
Site
It
414
T7
440
I Pt Jim
-Z 7, MULTI PLE RESIDENCE
A
T
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
LIMITED BUSINESS
Aft Avol-ft
33 tz:=
1 1
!PUBLIC
_SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL'
115Y fit- i
MULTI— FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
'COMMERCIAL
Zt
}
•
i
N=
•
• ^
W
/ I
i fo90
iii—
ilLfi�/
LLI
2tI0_
Z AI ; t14.L 1065
b n i
,� - -�—t-
!losC
/9
K •) j
4
243j
o
� Elio ..
)pl3o
ccs
k =
1 1
!PUBLIC
_SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL'
115Y fit- i
MULTI— FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
'COMMERCIAL
Zt
}
@'EFTi{PNG CORPORATION MINNEAPO EAL ESTATE & SITE DEVELOPMENT
t
October'9, 1978
To Whom It May Concern
Re: Burger King Restaurant
2800 W. 66th Street
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
VA
In response to the petition dated September 22, 1978 and
filed with the City of Richfield by citizens residing in
the proximity of this restaurant, a meeting between Burger
King representatives and the petitioners was held October
5, 1978 to resolve the complaints stated in the petition.
As a result of this meeting, Burger King agrees to the following:
1. Burger King employees will twice daily pick up litter
generated by our restaurant in the neighborhood in general, and
the 2700 and 2800 blocks on West 66th Street and from 66th to
67th Street on Upton and Vincent Avenues in particular.
2. Burger King will receive deliveries between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m.
a 3. Snowplowing in the Burger king parking lot will be done, as
necessary, between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.
4. Burger King employees will assist the petitioners to obtain
parking restrictions on Upton and Vincent Avenues between 66th
and 67th Streets by attempting to secure signatures of residents
of both blocks.
5. Burger King will attempt to have any contractual garbage/
trash pickup from the restaurant between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m.
6. Burger King will include in the construction of a drive -up
service window a screening device (i.e. fencing and /or shrubbery)
agreeable to the owners of the properties located at 2801,
2805, 2809, 2813 and 2817 West 66th Street. Such screening
device will be installed facing West 66th Street on said properties
at a cost not to exceed $1.00 per property owner. Such screening
device will be erected in accordance with applicable city codes
and will be owned by said properties owners. Burger King
will stain and repair, as necessary, any fencing so installed
but will assume no other liability concerning such fencing.
(612) 881 -5317 (Real Estate)
8120 PENN AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 345 t BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPHONE: (612) 8814912 (Site Development)
i
To Whom It May Concern
October 9, 1978
Page Two
7. Burger King will include in the construction of a
drive -up service window two speed control devices
(speed bumps) in the restuarant parking lot.
Sincerely,
James F. Winstead
Region Manager
JFW /lt
keeping with the spirit and intent of this part. The council may not permit
as a variance any use that is not permitted under this part for property in
the zone where the affected person's land is located. The council may impose
conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect
adjacent properties.
Subd. 3. Application for Adjustment -Fee. Application for any adjustment per-
missible under provisions of this section shall be made to the c ief inspector
by written application. An application for adjustment shall be accompanied by
payment of a fee as provided in Appendix D of this Code in addition to the
regular building fee, if any. (Bill 1977 -16) 8/8/77
Subd. 4'. Public Hearing on Adjustment. Upon receipt of any application, the
council may set a time and place for a public hearing on such application. At
least ten days before the date of any such hearing, a notice of the hearing
shall be published once in the official newspaper.
Subd. 5. Requirements for Compliance. In all cases in which adjustments or
variances are granted under the provisions of this section, the council shall
require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary to insure com-
pliance with the conditions designated in connection therewith.
Subd. 6. Conditions Upon Grant of Adjustment or Variance. Before granting an
application for an adjustment or variance, the council must find:
(1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the
particular land, building or use referred to in the application, not common to
other properties in this or similar districts.
(2) That the granting of the applications is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
(3) That the granting of the application will not materially and adversely
affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood
of the property of the applicant and will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood.
At the hearing the applicant shall present a statement and evidence in such form
as the city may require to show these facts.
Subd. 7. Orders. The council shall within a reasonable time make its order
deciding the matter and shall cause a copy of its order to be served by mail
upon the petitioner.
Subd. 8. Record of Proceedings. The council shall maintain a written record
of its proceedings which shall include minutes of meetings, its findings in
cases before it, and a record of action taken on each matter before it including
the final order.
Subd. 9. Review by Planning Agency. No decision shall be made by the board on
any matter before it until the planning agency acting pursuant to its authority
as set forth in part VII of this chapter shall first have had a reasonable op-
portunity, not to exceed 60 days, to review and report to the council upon any
matter referred to it by the council.
ORDINANCE CODE
8/8/77
80 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
approve,�I would recommend that:
1. The fence be placed a minimum.of four feet behind the
existing walk for snow storage purposes;
2. The existing shrub growth at 2801 and 2805 be removed
and the existing retaining wall at 2809 be rebuilt
with railroad ties as indicated;
3. The wall in front of 2801 be angled southeasterly to
prohibit a site obstruction for traffic entering 66th
Street at Upton Avenue.
The existing sidewalk is located 23 to 28 feet off centerline
of West 66th Street.
�.
KI- -
Marshall" Raaen
Technical Operations Superintendent
MR /vp
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and .
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
190M
Council Letter No. 351
Agenda December 11, 1978
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit for a
Restaurant, 4 West 66th Street
. Foon Duck Quan, Sik Wai Quan and United National Corporation
are proposing to operate a restaurant in the space at the Hub
Shopping Center formerly occupied by the R and C Bakery. The
restaurant would have a floor area of 1,800 .square feet and
would seat 68 people. The restaurant would also offer carry-
out service. Off - street parking for the restaurant would be
provided by the existing Hub Shopping Center parking lot. The
following items are attached to this council letter:
Site plan
Floor plan
Zoning Map
Land Use Map
Comprehensive Plan Map
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
1.
{
requires that a restaurant in a C -2 general commercial
zoning district obtain a special use permit.
c
Section 3.32, subdivision 4 sets standards with which
restaurants must comply.
3.
t
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and .
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
190M
Council Letter No. 351
Agenda December 11, 1978
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit for a
Restaurant, 4 West 66th Street
. Foon Duck Quan, Sik Wai Quan and United National Corporation
are proposing to operate a restaurant in the space at the Hub
Shopping Center formerly occupied by the R and C Bakery. The
restaurant would have a floor area of 1,800 .square feet and
would seat 68 people. The restaurant would also offer carry-
out service. Off - street parking for the restaurant would be
provided by the existing Hub Shopping Center parking lot. The
following items are attached to this council letter:
Site plan
Floor plan
Zoning Map
Land Use Map
Comprehensive Plan Map
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
1.
Section 3.32, subdivision 3 of the zoning ordinance
requires that a restaurant in a C -2 general commercial
zoning district obtain a special use permit.
2.
Section 3.32, subdivision 4 sets standards with which
restaurants must comply.
3.
Section 3.41, subdivision 5 requires that it be demon-
strated that a restaurant would not be detrimental to
public welfare.
4.
Section 3.41, subdivision 5A requires that uses in re-
development areas requiring special use permits must be
in compliance with the comprehensive plan, Redevelopment
Plan, Urban Design Guidelines, Parking Guidelines, and
Landscape Guidelines.
All of these ordinance provisions apply to this proposal since the
property
is zoned C -2 and is located in the L /H /N Redevelopment
Area.
Council Letter No. 351 -2- December 11, 1978
Staff Findings
The staff has made the following findings relative to this
proposal:
1. The restaurant would be compliance with the compre-
hensive plan.
2. The existing Hub Center is not in compliance with the
Redevelopment Plan, Urban Design Guidelines, parking
regulations and landscape guidelines. The city has
approved preliminary PUD plans which, if carried out,
would bring the Hub Center into compliance with city
regulations. Final PUD plans are currently being
completed and will be submitted for council review late
this year or early next year.
3. A restaurant type use in this location would be in
compliance with the Redevelopment Plan.
4. If the.Hub PUD does not proceed, parking lot improve-
ments and additional urban design amenities would be
necessary for the restaurant to be in compliance with
city requirements.
5. Sufficient parking is available in the existing Hub
Shopping Center lot and will be available in the proposed
Hub PUD. If the Hub PUD does not proceed, the existing
parking lot design will create congestion problems if
the restaurant were to be located as proposed.
6. The planned improvements on Nicollet Avenue and 66th
Street through the L /H /N Redevelopment Plan will provide
sufficient capacity to handle the traffic volume gener-
ated by the proposed restaurant and other uses in the
Hub Shopping Center. .
In summary, the staff has found that the restaurant would be
incompliance with city requirements and would not be detrimental
to the public welfare if the final Hub Shopping Center PUD plans
are developed and implemented.
Staff Recommendation
It is recommended that the special use permit be approved sub-
ject to the following stipulations:
1. That final Hub PUD plans or alternative parking lot
and urban design plans for the area near the restaurant
be approved by the city council.
2. That United National Corporation post a sufficient bond
to insure that the parking lot adjacent to the proposed
restaurant is improved by the summer of 1979, with the
bond amount to be determined by the city manager.
0
Council Letter No. 351 -3- December 11, 1978
3. That signing and the building front design conform
to the L /H /N Urban Design Guidelines.
Planning Commission Recommendation
The planning commission reviewed this matter at their November
28, 1978 meeting. It is the recommendation of the planning commi-
ssion that the special use permit be issued with the three stipu-
lations described in the staff recommendation. The planning commi-
ssion added the additional comment that the three stipulations
only apply to the restaurant area, and not the Hub Center as a
whole.
Respectfully ubmitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaf
City Manager
WSB /ej a
cc: Planning & Redevelopment_ Director
I
4-0
lu
It
3i
1 �i�j f �.-.. � fit.
PM
V-1
4
t C -
i;
�W=i'
r• i
's; f
q
cr
[Zoning Ma:p)�
.:0
A.7
G -o Ds
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
LIMITED BUSINESS
f. 4 -3 ;5
14
it
cr
[Zoning Ma:p)�
.:0
A.7
G -o Ds
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
LIMITED BUSINESS
f. 4 -3 ;5
PUBLIC
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
iY:•'.itd ?i:::•:;::: naafi ;;:::.::;:;::';;:;:;`:::::.: �:: . ::.:; a ......:::::::::.: >: -.;;: ;:::�::; %•i :i s i >: `': _ : _ _ -
i
M-1
lz
CO
t a'
i
ti
.Exr.Earx ..E -L = -- ,, - — — �• ¢ — — , xr.�x.» .xE
li
II
r il I
-1 i-E-
--+7:
1,113-sillill), All.
AN
k
-Aill-010,11 ANTI.
4 -li
It
4
li
II
r il I
-1 i-E-
--+7:
1,113-sillill), All.
AN
k
-Aill-010,11 ANTI.
:7
iI
io 6
4
d
A:
7T-
A
ULUSPALE AVE.
:7
iI
SITI., PLAN
It PREUtMAKY
I-Im �,_ MAP 10
io 6
4
A
SITI., PLAN
It PREUtMAKY
I-Im �,_ MAP 10
NP: ✓C 4 �4� 1�' �}.E r .. _.
,� \a t*6 %s�•11 0 -.'4 l �+<,',� r`rt y�Y ax k ilg A,.
m
� � '`° �,3'd' ew . �' � a{ �� i Y '' �'�` � : sue* ; � .�•�'t R `b;��'' t a
..-�m0-
-� �_ •_�' � � . ; ` �\ °fin � � .;sue �'�" � � _ '�"� . ,�,�' � �
-
,'.-, k_
_ r'""���. =- _- � �••f:. r �F�a:a)�Z � O a'� = t, .,.- y' a- -� r :.,s � E9 [.
., mss. y,• 1..� �--� �—� L �� i �I. It f •(Imom
6,
rcli
t-
..- 00
..... ....... �--_, •��, -- j _ q
J s ,.
Z _ 0p k
I all.111
O 4 v m 9 �T .. r nc �. -
� - �J -���'_ i •�' =:33�� t,;;�.• ��- �'� ��a°pfi?�i'titr:�� i5 Y r.
2-1 6 E r `���1 fir --- _�.l�kr' ( tip J - ,-
MR- - a -;,w{� <�` -.�F. t i �`•:. b- -; `_ .��s ,sc` �-'�.irg , ?u ..
Z.-,1'i .T:..F
m . tw. .'!w #
njVj
COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT
,i PROGRAM RICHFIELD, MN
(k) All exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated
as not to be a nuisance to adjacent properties.
(1) If the station or garage is to be located in a shopping center
or other integrated development, it will be in architectural har:nony with
the rest of the center or development.
(m) The station or garage will not provide for the outdoor operation
of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor
display of merchandise; but the outside underground storage of gasoline and
other petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary display.- of merchan-
dise within 4 feet of the station building is permitted.
(n) If the station or garage is not to -be located on a count_:, road
or state highway, it shall not be operated between the hours o- 11:00 p.:ml.
and 6:00 a.m. of the following day.
(o) If the site is at an intersection, provision will be made for
an unobstructed area on the site, adjacent to and within 50.feet of the in-
tersection, free of vehicles, signs (other than a pedestal sign), displays
or other materials which tend to obstruct intersection visibilir-y.
Subd. 4. ReQula.tions Relating to Hotels, Motels, Restaurants and Cafes.
A special use permit shall not be granted for a hotel, motel, restaurant or
cafe unless the council finds that the proposed use will be in substantial
compliance with the following standards:
(a) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic con-
gestion either on the public streets adjacent to the site or on the parking
areas on or adjacent to the site or on streets adjacent to the site unto
which traffic to or from the site is channeled.
(b) Adequate provision will be made, through the use of buildinC
setbacks, buffer areas, screening, and exterior treatment or placement of
the building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust, and any other
sources of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent properties.
(c) Adequate provision will be made through the use of building
setbacks, screening, landscaping, exterior design and placement of the
building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust and any other - sources
of nuisance or annoyance to users, or patrons of the facility.
(d) Adequate off - street parking space is available for patrons and
employees.
(e) If liquor is to be sold on the premises (1) of the property abuts
upon a main thoroughfare of the city, (2) access to all off- street parking
space is from internal driveway systems and is not directly- from public
streets, and (3) provision is made for well - designed vehicular stacking space
allowing for an efficient and orderly flow of traffic from the site onto
adjacent main thoroughfares of the city. "Main thoroughfares of the city ".
as used in this paragraph, means a street designated as a state trunk highway
or a service drive adjacent to the state trunk highway, a state aid ht-.1 ay, a
county aid highway, a county highway, or a street which is so located as to
serve, primarily, commercial development. (Bill 1976 -10) 4/26/`70
(f) The proposed facility will provide an aesthetic appearance which
will not detract from or conflict with the existing or proposed architectural
form of buildings in the same area.
(g) The use will not create an excessive burden on public parks,
public open - space, streets, or utilities requiring public servi:os which
are proposed to serve the facility.
ORDINANCE CODE
'/ -'6/76
65.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
(h) The proposed development will not conflict with the comprehensive
development plan of the city.
Subd. 5. Height Regulations. In a "C -2" district no buiidin� shall hereafter
be erected or structurally altered to exceed three stories of 40 feet in
height, subject to the modifications and exceptions provided in Section 3.39
of this chapter.
Subd. 6. Lot Areas and Yard Reguire:lents. (The same requirements s'::all be
observed for the "C -2" district as are provided for a "C -1" district _.
Section 3.32 of this chapter.)
(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subdivision the same
minimum requirements shall be observed for "C -2" district as are pro'. -'L ded for
a "C -1" district in Section 3.32.
(2) A gasoline service station may construct a canopy extended into the
building setback area of the lot on which it is located provided that such
canopy complies with the following regulations:
(a) It must be designed and constructed to serve as protection for
customers and attendants from inclement weather.
(b) It may extend into the front yard area distance of 10 feet, as
measured from the centerline of the gasoline pump island closest to the street
lot line but in no instance closer than five feet from this lot line.
(c) Only one canopy shall be permitted at each service station, �:nlesS
it is located on a corner lot.
(d) It shall_ be designed and constructed as an integral part of the
main service station building and shall extend from such building.
(e) The canopy shall not be constructed to a height exceedin_ sixteen
feet.
(f) The canopy shall not be designed for use nor shall it be used as
a location for any business or advertising sign of a permanent or temporary
construction.
(g) Lighting located on the canopy shall be designed as an integral
part of the canopy providin; that fixtures shall not extend below the bottom
surface of the canopy structure and shall be beamed downward.
(h) The canopy shall not be used as the location for lights or
lighting fixtures used to illuminate the service station building, off- street
parking areas or other areas not directly beneath the canopy. Flashing lights
and rotating lights shall not be located on or attached to the canopy.
(i) No canopy, whether it conforms with the foregoing regulations or
not, shall be constructed in a location or manner which will block or obscure
the vision of automobile traffic on any street adjacent to the ser-vice
station or the vision of an automobile entering or leaving the service station.
(Bill 1972 -6) 3/13/72
Subd. 7. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3. +0 the co•:ncil ;:Ia"• 'Irant Iii
exception or an adjustment to any of the requirements of this section where
the council finds that the project encourages a more creative and e-tfici.ent
approach to the use of land and to environmental desi,,n than is provici.od under
the strict application of the zoning regulations of the city., rrovi "'ed th -it
the project is consistent with the purposes of such res. lati.ons.
(dill 1972 -6) 3/13/72
ORDINANCE CODE
b3.2 CITY OF RICHFIELD. MINNESOTA
i
3.41. SPECIAL USE PERMITS
Subdivision 1. Issuance. Special use permits may be issued for any of the
following:
(1) Any of the uses or purposes for which such permits are required or
permitted by the provisions of this chapter.
(2) Public utility or public service uses or public building in any district
when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare.
(3) Commercial excavating or natural materials used for building or con-
struction purposes, in any district.
(4) To classify as a conforming use any institutional use existing in any
district at the time of the establishment of such district.
(5) -To permit the location of any of the following uses in a district from
which they are excluded by the provisions of this code: airport, library,
community center, church, hospital and institution of an educational, philan-
thropic or charitable nature, cemetery, crematory, mausoleum or any other place
for the disposal of human dead.
(6) For any use covered by Section 3.35.
Subd. 2. Limitation on Issuance. A special permit may not be issued for the
purpose of granting an adjustment or appeal pursuant to Section 3.40 nor for
any use not authorized for the specific district for which the permit is sought,
nor for any use prohibited in all districts by the provisions of this part.
Subd. 3. Application. Application for the issuance of a special use permit
shall be made to the chief inspector. Any proceedings to classify certain uses
as conforming uses as provided in this section may be initiated either by such
application or by the council.
Subd. 4. Public Hearing. The council may hold such hearings on the proposal
to issue a special use permit as it may consider necessary; but at least one
public hearing shall be held by the council or by a committee or commission
to be designated by the council in any application for a use permit for the
establishment of any use listed in Subdivision 1, Subsections 5 and 7, of
this section.
Subd. 5. Conditions Governing Issuance. The council shall not grant a permit
for any of the uses enumerated in Subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds that
the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use for which a use permit
is sought will not under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental,
(1) to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or welfare of the persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of such use, or (2) to the public wel-
fare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood.
Subd. 5A. Conditions Governing Issuance of a Special Use Permit in an
Officially Approved Redevelopment Area. The council shall not grant a permit
for any uses enumerated in Subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds . that the es-
tablishment, maintenance or operation of the use for which the permit is sought
is in compliance with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan, with any officially
adopted redevelopment plans and urban design guidelines thereof, and with the
city's parking regulations and landscape guidelines. (Bill 1978 -1) 2/13/78
ORDINANCE CODE
2/13/73
81 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
DATE
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
My only
lot and
park?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Inter— Office Memorandum
November 14, 1978
Dick Krier
Marshall Raaen
Special Use Permit - 4 west 66th Street
comment is with the new entrance to the Hub parking
changed parking, where will patrons of this business
Marshall Raaen
Technical Operations Superintendent
MR /vp
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 350
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf ield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Request for Extension of Time to Initiate
Special Use Permit Use
On December 5, 1977, the city council approved a special
use permit for Penn Properties, Inc. to permit construction of
a six -unit, three story apartment building at 6945 Penn Avenue.
Section 3.41, subdivision 7 of the zoning ordinance requires
that a use must be initiated within one year after a special
use permit is issued, or the special use permit expires. The
same ordinance provides that the city council may extend the
special use permit period by an additional one year.
The property owners have been unable to initiate the apart-
ment use on this site because of problems in obtaining construct -
ion financing. Because of this, they are requesting that the
city council extend the initiation period for the special use
permit by one year to give them additional time to obtain the
necessary financing. A copy of the letter requesting the ex-
tension of the special use permit is attached.
It is recommended that the city council grant the request
to extend the special use permit for 6945 Penn Avenue by one
year.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaf,�
City Manager
WSB /ej a
cc: Planning & Redevelopment Director
I
Mr. Wayne Burggraaff
City Manager
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN. 55423
Dear Mr. Burggraaff:
November 22, 1978
REALTY CENTER
7600 Parklawn Avenue
Edina, MN 55435
(612) 835 -7600
REALTY CENTER SOUTH
301 Burnsville Parkway
Burnsville. MN 55337
( 612) 894 -4700
I am writing in regards to the Special Use Permit issued December 5, 1977,
for 6945 Penn Avenue South, to commence construction on a six —unit, three
story apartment building. This permit is due to expire December 5, 1978 and
as the agent acting for Penn Properties, Inc., I respectfully submit a request
to extend the permit for a period of one year.
Construction on the building has not yet been started due to the inability
to obtain the necessary financing. However, I feel if granted the extension,
we will be able to work out the financial details and commence construction
within a short time.
It is my understanding from Mr. Kuehl, that this letter be directed toward
you and you will in turn present the request to the City Council for approval.
If you should have any questions, or if I can be of assistance, please do not
hesitate to call. I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
'<g' tLW"2e__
Steve Hedrick
REALTY CENTER
SH /pm
cc: Mr. 118rb Kuehl
i � 1
AwIS
Cy
IfITERSiRTf
f[fiMK SNW(E
1
r
3.41. SPECIAL USE PERMITS
Subdivision 1. Issuance. Special use permits may be issued for any of the
following:
(1) Any of the uses or purposes for which such permits are required or
permitted by the provisions of this chapter.
(2) Public utility or public service uses or public building in any .district
when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare.
(3) Commercial excavating or natural materials used for building or con-
struction purposes, in any district.
(4) To classify as a conforming use any institutional use existing in any
district at the time of the establishment of such district.
(5) 'To permit the location of any of the following uses in a district from
which they are excluded by the provisions of this code: airport, library,
community center, church, hospital and institution of an educational, philan-
thropic or charitable nature, cemetery, crematory, mausoleum or any other place
for the disposal of human dead.
(6) For any use covered by Section 3.35.
Subd. 2. Limitation on Issuance. A special permit may not be issued for the
purpose of granting an adjustment or appeal pursuant to Section 3.40 nor for
any use not authorized for the specific district for which the permit is sought,
nor for any use prohibited in all districts by the provisions of this part.
Subd. 3. Application. Application for the issuance of a special use permit
shall be made to the chief inspector. Any proceedings to classify certain uses
as conforming uses as provided in this section may be initiated either by such
application or by the council.
Subd. 4. Public Hearing. The council may hold such hearings on the proposal
to issue a special use permit as it may consider necessary; but at least one
public hearing shall be held by the council or by a committee or commission
to be designated by the council in any application for a use permit for the
establishment of any use listed in Subdivision 1, Subsections 5 and 7, of
this section.
Subd. 5. Conditions Governing Issuance. The council shall not grant a permit
for any of the uses enumerated in Subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds that
the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use for which a use permit
is sought will not under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental,
(1) to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or welfare of the persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of such use, or (2) to the public wei-
fare or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood.
Subd. 5A. Conditions Governing, Issuance of a Special Use Permit in an
Officially Approved Redevelopment Area. The council shall not grant a permit
for any uses enumerated in Subdivision 1 hereof unless it finds that the es-
tablishment, maintenance or operation of the use for which the permit is sought
is in compliance with the Richfield Comprehensive Plan, with any officially
adopted redevelopment plans and urban design guidelines thereof, and with t20
"city's parking regulations and landscape guidelines. (Bill 1975 -1) 2%13/75
ORDINANCE CODE
2/13/78
gl CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
a.
Subd. 6. Imposition of Conditions on Issuance. The council may impose con-
ditions and require guarantees in the granting of use permits. Any use permitted
under the terms of any special use permit shall be established and conducted in
conformity to the terms of such permit and of any conditions designated in con-
nection therewith.
Subd. 7. Special Use Permit Time Limitations. A special use permit expires one
year after it has been issued unless the use for which the permit has been
granted has commenced within such year or unless, upon written application of
the owner of the affected land, the council shall extend the expiration date of
such permit for an additional period, not to exceed one year.
Subd. 8. Special Use Permit - Fee. Application for a special use permit shall
be accompanied with the required fee provided in Appendix D of this Code.
(Bill 1977 -16) 8/8/77
3.42. AMENDMENT TO THIS PART: PROCEDURE
Subdivision 1. Scope of this Section. This part of Chapter III may be amended
only in conformance with the procedures outlined in this Section.
Subd. 2. Public Hearings. No zoning ordinance or amendment thereto shall be
adopted until a public hearing has been held thereon by the council.
Subd. 3. Notice of Hearing. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the
hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the municipality at
least ten days prior to the day of the hearing.
Subd. 4. Mailing of Notice. When an amendment involves changes in district
boundaries affecting an area of five acres or less, a similar notice shall be
mailed at least ten days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected
property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the property
to which the amendment relates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, the
person responsible for mailing the notice may use any appropriate records to
determine the names and addresses of owners.. A copy of the notice and a list
of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to
by the responsible person and shall be made a part of the records of the pro-
ceedings. The failure to give mailed notice to individual property owners, or
defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a bona
fide attempt to comply with this subdivision has been made. (Bill 1974 -3)
4/8/74
Subd. 5. Initiation of Amendment. An amendment may be initiated by the council
or by the petition of the owners of not less than fifty percent of the land por-
posed to be rezoned and by the-owners of at least fifty percent of the land
within three hundred feet of the land proposed to be rezoned.
Subd. 6. Petitioning Landowners not to Include Public Ownership. Properties
owned by federal, state, municipal entities or other political subdivisions
shall be excluded from any computation of the percentage of landowners neces-
sary for rezoning petitions initiated by landowners.
8/8/77
ORDINANCE CODE 82 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
f
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
- � z t I(Z )
Council Letter No. 349
Agenda December 11, 1978
Subject: Discussion of Animal Control Ordinances
Councilman Luettinger has requested that a discussion item
be scheduled for the December 11, 1978 city council meeting re-
garding the city's animal control and licensing ordinances.
WSB /ej a
cc: Public Safety Director
City Clerk
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
a
rn
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 348
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Consideration of Appointments to Wine
Licensing Ordinance Study Committee
On October 10, 1978 the city council adopted guidelines
providing for creation of a citizens committee to study a proposed
wine licensing ordinance. A copy of the guidelines adopted by
the city council for this committee is attached.
Attached to this council letter are applications received
from persons interested in being considered for appointment to
this committee.
WSB/ ej a
cc: Public Safety Director
City Clerk
Respectfully s mitted,
0 W E. 0 1
Iti
Wayne S..Burggraa
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 5984
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT,
FUNCTION AND DISSOLUTION OF AN AD HOC CITIZEN
COMMITTEE TO STUDY THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE
CITY SHOULD ISSUE WINE LICENSES
WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council for several months has been
deliberating on the question of whether the City of Richfield should
issue wine licenses, and
WHEREAS, it appears that the question has generated interest
from diverse groups within the city, and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has, from time to time, found it
to be in the best interest of the community to establish advisory comm-
ittees to serve in designated capacities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
-Richfield as follows:
1.. There is hereby established an Ad Hoc Wine Licensing
.Ordinance Study Committee.
2. The committee shall serve in an advisory capacity to the
city council.
3. The committee shall be comprised of seven to nine voting
members, representing a cross - section of the community,
male and female, as well as at least one representative
from the following organizations:
Richfield Ministerial Association
Richfield PTA
Richfield Planning Commission
Richfield Business Community
4. Non - voting, ex- officio members representing the city council
and city staff shall also participate with and on this
committee in accomplishing the assigned tasks.
5. Regular voting members shall be appointed in October,
1978 with service to begin immediately. Termination
of service shall occur at such time as the committee
forwards a recommendation to the city council regarding
whether the City of Richfield should adopt an ordinance
providing for the issuance of wine licenses.
6. The purpose of this committee shall be to review and make
recommendations to the Richfield City Council on the
desirability and /or methodology of providing for issuance
of wine licenses to Richfield restaurants. This task may
include, but not be limited to, the following activities:
(a) receive testimony from interested residents,
businessmen, and others regarding proposed wine
licensing process;
(b) survey other area municipalities to determine
what they are doing, and what their experience
has been, with a wine licensing process;
(c) identify requirements which should be included
in any wine licensing process or ordinance;
(d) make recommendation to city council regarding
wine licensing.
7. If the committee's study results in a recommendation
to proceed with adoption of a wine licensing ordinance,
the committee should recommend such an ordinance for
city council review and adoption.
8. Any of the following shall cause the position of a regular
member to become vacated:
(a) death
(b) Disability or failure to serve, shown by failure to
attend three (3) consecutive meetings of the committee
without prior notice or permission of the committee
to be excused
(c) removal of legal residence from the city
(d) resignation in writing
(e) removal by the city council
(f) election or appointment to a public office
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this 10th day of October, 1978.
Loren L. Law MAYOR
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran CITY CLERK
0-
0
NAME VCS i S 'e-
Last
HOME ADDRESS
APPLICATION FOR CIT`' OF RI: HF'IEL
RY COMMITTEE OR COPY�MISSICN APP
iUcu �Y
Street No.
C E
-
"S
Alit s (5
Cit"
MAILING ADDRESS (if different frorr, home address)
Street No.
City
PHONE: Home — U Business
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comm .
Senior Citizen & Handicapped
Advisory Commission )(
WiV-Ne l tCeazbe� Cr�Vc� nr,v�rc
i4 r (1 � �;� "Ij
i— ,- �f�'uj �9r8
-7 :i e
Human Rights Con-.mission
C:vil Service Cor ^mission
Advisory Board of health
Other
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience %,.,hick you beiieve qualify you `cr this
municipal commission, committee and why , >-ou are interested in serving
c -ev-ne CA C i -�\-L-e- "-� 0
ti
.j c:1r�� 1 e
� �, -t-. �' �� - l i
Ct ►� 1 m �� :rAc� ;1
i s �, �� c�
1 �
1 V-\ V0i VJCL \ Yl
e CL
AJ cc, hn
I i c �0e \jeraG;es
be- S-,-- V- Ue --d
i Y-"�
-TGt Yv'1 , i
Y e �Q ul v' Q T S
CX 61C� 1' ► 22-
{�Gi Y �OrS ,
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, AND COMMliI:� TTY A CTIVITIES:
CI C"
l uk o C)c d ti J Y-, Ct
` C 1 i \E�CLC i \C V l\ 1C� \�i�.�� LUG' -WveV- k\ .
SU r\ �a�� -)cy,C
kC'i''
OCCUPATION:
Employing ,firm, agency rnE, MC<
Address �c�it -�t� -i t� --��� 1 M Sckcc Is
Position `;'ears /'firm /agenc:
Other work experience (optional)
REFERENCES (Optional)
A.
Full name
Mailing address
B.
Full name
C.
Mailing address
Full name
Mailing address
Relationship
Phone number
Relationship
Phone number
Relationship
Phone number
Return to: City Manager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield 55423
Att• - i'iIne,n A- l::rc�r.
0
Date
APPLICAT ir-)N -,C)P, CIT o—, RICHE T
E T 7-N
DVISORY COMMITTEE OR C(-
M T S
I T
SION APPOI,\Q
NAME
Lee-
Last
HOMEADDRESS
Street No.
Cit"
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from
home aJdreSsl
Street No.
PHONE: Home 5/-
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission
Park and Recreation Advisory Cotnm.
Senior Citizen & Handicapped
Advisory Commission
Business
0 .978
C'
!
vmrjagar
Human Rights Commission
C'vil Service CD=,,ission
Advisory Board of Lieajth
li_477,
,z
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience %--,hich you believe qualify you f3r this
municipal commission/ comm ittee and why you are interested in serving:
Z�
/C
Lv
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND C OM M I T ACTIVITIES:
G)
. -
J
OCCUPATION: �,
Employing ,firm, agency
Address ,k 1L-
Position X �c ��f.,� Years
Other work experience (optional) /
REFERENCES (Optional)
A.
Full name Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
B.
Full name Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
C.
Full name Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
Return to: City %tanager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield 55423
Att: Lileen AnLerson
Appointed by Planning Commission Date October 25, 1978
at their regular meeting of -
October 24, 1978.
APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
NAME Helmberger Joan
Last First Middle
HOME ADDRESS 6914 Park Avenue South Richfield, MN 55474
Street No. City Zip Code
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address)
Street No. City Zip Code
PHONE: Home 869 -8057 Business
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission Human Rights Commission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission
Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health
Advisory Commission Other Wine Licensing Studv
i e
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this
municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving:
Currently - Planning Commission Member
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMM UNITYACTIVITIES:
4 �
Date November 21, 1978
NOV 21-1973
R1Cii ula (; Y �'PRBMVORYPCOMMITTEETOR COMMiSSION1APPCIj�iT %'FN
NAME LYTLE CARLTON W.
Last
HOME ADDRESS 1400 West 74th Street Richfield 55423
Street No.
cite,Gi
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address;
Street No.
PHONE: Horne 869 -5187
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
C_ry
Business
s ame
Planning Commission Human Rights Cocnmission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comim. Ci, ✓il Service Commission
Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of reaith
Advisory Commission Other WINE COMMISSION
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience %vhich you believe uualit,r .✓ou for this
municipal commission /committee and whv -ou are interested in serving:
My only interest in serving is because whatever we can do for the benefit and
good of Richfield is important. Whether I as an individual believe in something
or not has to be put aside for what I think is good for the community and I
will work toward that end. My long association with Richfield through the office
of School Superintendent gave me a feel of the real pi0 se of tl)e community.
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, AND COMMU?'T`c' ACTIVITIES:
Chairman of Richfield Golf Course committee; Chairman of Chamber of Commerce
Governmental Affairs Committee; Lifetime rrPTn , of MASA & PTA; Richfield Lions;
President of Past Presidents of Reserve Officers of State of Minn.
OCCUPATION:
Employing ,firm, agency Retired*
Addre s s
Position
Other work experience (optional)
_'ears w/fir:-' /agerc
^'Superi-tendent of School District #280. Retired officer of Naval Reserve.
REFERENCES (Optional)
A. Gene Olive Principal of Richfield Senior High
Full name Relationship
_7001 Harriei- Ave. So. 861 -7511
Mailing address Phone number
B. George Karnas
Full name -
Chamber of Commerce
Relationship
7500 Northliner Drive 55450 726 -7515
Mailing address Phone number
C. John Hamilton Richfield School Board
Full: name Relationship
866 -5680 (home)
.7220 Harriet Ave. So. 938-5511 (work)
Mailing address Phone number
Return to: City Manager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield 55423
Att: Eileen An�,erson
i
La to J Cam`(
APFLIC TI i I i R CiT'' O RiCHFIEL i_ 0 R 11 1:1
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COT'AMISSICN APP.
:iT�` �. T 0 1g78
NAME ()
La t
AHOME ADDRESS
Street No. C r Zi. - e
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address;
Street No. City ip de
PHONE: Home GCGJP Y7 Business SZ /2 or
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission Human Righis Comi. mission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. C -,.,i1 Service Comp :ission
Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Ieaith
Advisory Commission Other
r
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience whic ; you believe quaiif l you for this
municipal commiss.ionj`commit*_ee and why You are .nterested in serving:
!�S A l`r71l zGN fJ� QtcrJF,c p srivc£ SERf, ! 9� `1 � Cc-� r'rew.r�
H
l,V, � Ls.4"4 Pe. ✓ Ix s.. (ro Gv 1 % {y v.r- , re avub(4—s f%_ 64-y S u c i r i '/ 4a'�L &14
1t Cl crr `�M Yi;o (!, a (e' P Z't GZ f t f to Crt,os, rc� �iPu✓ Cr}�/�ea f rsv �= ti`tec
4JP��, rti�ly�Je� tx ,J05�- SPCs..rliif ac�.�. f. , �Qy f�r V,
lcr`�l
E tT ✓e o-r--• 6v42 - a--k 4-5 < p4 Yr 5 L.
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUN TTY ACTIVITIES:
W (L
M
<A Z-'-
Y o 1 "' /-- � &<" b I ",
C' C'U'e
z.
M
,ev
Aj
1
OCCUPATION:
Employing firm, agency
Address &/z
r
Position � �if� ri� years w/firm /agent,.
5r s ,7,*)
Other work experience (optional)
le
REFERENCES (Optional)
A. Z I P 2��_ eadog 4tu_,:
Full name Relationship
--
Mailing address Phone number
B..
Full name Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
C.
Full- name Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
Return to: City Manager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield 55423
Att. Eileen Anaerson
Y
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 347
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen: .
Subject: 1979/84 Capital Improvement Program
The city council has scheduled a public hearing on the
proposed 1979/84- Capital Improvement Program for December 11, 1978.
The purpose of this public hearing is to receive testimony from
interested residents and representatives of city advisory comm-
issions regarding the proposed scheduling of the city's major
capital projects over the next five years.
After the close of this public hearing, it is recommended
that the city council adopt the 1979/84 Capital Improvement Program.
Respectfully submitted,
S l
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
CITY OF RICHFIELD,.MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
0 Council Letter No. 346
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Award of Bid, Air Siren Warning System
On September 11, 1978 the council authorized the call for bids
for the first phase of the public safety air siren warning im-
provement project. Bids were opened on November 20, 1978 in
accordance with this previous city council authorization. The
public works director, public safety director, environmental
health director, park and recreation director and the city
accountant were also present at this bid opening. The bid tab-
ulation and minutes are attached for city council review.
Only one bid was submitted for this project by the Electric
Service Company. Electric Service. Company does the majority of
the civil defense siren work in our area and has the experience
needed to handle this rather complex installation work.
The bid included three specific parts, calling for the install-
ation of a new siren in the Augsburg Park area, the rehabilitation
and relocation of three other sirens as a part of the project to
upgrade the overall city siren warning system, and the relocation
and rehabilitation.of a fourth siren that must be moved as a result
of the relocation of 65th Street.
The bid from Electric Service Company was $8,950 for the in-
stallation of a new siren, $5,982 for the relocation and rehabil-
itation of the three sirens as a part of our improvement project-
and $1,800 for the relocation and rehabilitation of the siren
involved in the relocation of 65th Street. Therefore, the total
bid for the siren improvement project was $14,932, with the bid
for the siren work in the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet project an addi-
tional $1,800. The federal government has already authorized the
expenditure of $12,000 for the first phase of our siren relocation
project and has now indicated that they will provide the necessary
additional funds to meet the bid the city has received. Funds are
available in the L /H /N project for the siren work necessary as a
result of the relocation of 65th Street.
' Council Letter No. 346 -2- December11,1978
The public safety director has been informed by the bidder that
the cost of the relocation and rehabilitation of the three sirens
could be reduced as much as $600 depending on the frost condition
of the ground at the time the installation takes place. The con-
tractor has indicated he can start immediately on this project
and the specifications call for a 90 -day completion date from the
award of the contract.
It is the recommendation of the public safety director, in which
I concur, that the council award this bid to Electric Service
Company in the total amount not to exceed $16,73.2, with the under-
standing that this may be reduced by a maximum of $600 if install -
ation work can commence immediately, before there is heavy frost
in the ground.
Respectfully submitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaff
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Safety Director
Finance Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD
BID OPENING
November 20, 1978
Air Warning Improvement Project
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative
Staff was called by Wayne Burggraaff, City Manager, who announced that the
purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for an
Air Warning Improvement Project as advertised in the official newspaper on
November 1, 1978.
Present: Wayne Burggraaff, City Manager
Carl Marinics, Public Works Director
Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director
I. F. Roesler, Environmental Health Director
Don Fondrick, Park & Recreation Director
Jean Mitchell, City Accountant
The following bid was submitted and read aloud:
BIDDER AND PART I PART II TOTAL
BID SECURITY UNIT COST UNIT COST BID COST
Electric Service Co. $5,982 (Relocation)
B.B. 5% $8,950 $1,800 (Siren) $16,732
The City Manager announced that the bid would be evaluated and considered
at the regular council meeting of December 11,E \1978.
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 345
Agenda December 11, 1978
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Gentlemen:
Subject: Release of Bond for Off- Street Parking
Contract, 6335 Cedar Avenue South
On June 12, 1978 the city council authorized execution of
an off- street parking contract with Mrs. Margaret Traiser for
property located at 6335 Cedar Avenue. Mrs. Traiser rents out
this property for storage and light manufacturing.
An inspection of the site by the public works department in-
dicates that the owner has complied with all terms of the off-
street parking agreement. Therefore, it is recommended that
the city council adopt the attached resolution, authorizing the
release of the performance bond for the off - street parking
contract for 6335 Cedar Avenue.
Respectfully s mitted,
Wayne S. Burggraaf
City Manager
WSB /eja
cc: Public Works Director
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND ON OFF- STREET PARKING
Mrs. Margaret Traiser
Location: 6335 Cedar Avenue South
Use: Rental Building, for
storage and light mfg.
WHEREAS, Mrs. Margaret Traiser, 9845 Oak Shore Drive, Lakeville,
Minnesota, had an off - street parking agreement with the City of Richfield,
relating to 6335 Cedar Avenue South, which contract bears the designation
of Contract No. 2267, and which contract was guaranteed by a cashier's
check in the amount of $2,000, and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Margaret Traiser has complied with the provisions of
said agreement and now seeks to be relieved of any further obligation
under said bond, and
WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring Mrs.
Margaret Traiser to continue to provide a bond for security on the
performance of said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
That the city manager is hereby authorized and directed to
release Mrs. Margaret Traiser for any and all acts committed or incurred
in violation of Contract No. 2267 on and after the 11th day of
December, 1978.
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
Loren L. Law Mayor