The URL can be used to link to this page

01-08-79 agendaie . ra on the,polide investigation of this `application for renewal, is j r, ' attached. Accountant' -s Report The of -sake liquor; ordinance requires that the applicant file with the city ;a statement made 'by a certified public account -' ant which shows the total gross sales .and. the total food sales of the preceding "twelve month period. This information has been , provided by The Godfather, Inc. for the month August through. October; 1977, (the first three months of operation) as well as -: for the twelve months' ending on October 31, 1978. aj 3 Months Endin � 12 Months Endin g, g October 31 1977 October 31, 1978 Total Sales $ 191, 971 „ $ 639,185 = r Food Sales 96,183 3,34,452 % `of Food Sales to Total 52% of Liquor Sales to Total 49.9% 48 %; The purpose of obtaining this information is that the state A statutes require the serving of food to'be a:principal part of the business of a restaurant which has ari on -sale liquor license..,. Council members will. recall that originally the-city' included a definition of the phrase "principal part ordinance of the business ", stating more than 50% of the gross;retalil sales of licensed premises must be derived from the sale of food. That definition'was deleted in 1971, leaving only the s atutory re- s quirement which does not include °a definition:of t e phrase. The city attorney has advised that "principal part of the business" may be interpreted to refer, to' percent oE gross sales, but also to such things as the amount of investment necessary to serve food, compared to the serving,of beverages Dr the number of employees engaged in the preparation and sere n �of food com. pared with.beVerages; or the amount 'of space.provi ed`for' the Pre paration and serving of food as compared with b verages. In short, the statute, could be defined in a'_number of ways and in no ways .infers that'the:definiton must be Tmited to a percent of gross retail sales. A stipulation attached to the original - livens required that the applicant file a monthly financial 'stat merit with the city. Although there has been some 'difficulty and delay in re -, ceving some of these monthly financial statements, the licensee has provided-financial, statements through October', 1978. 'These financial statements revealed an operating deficit significantly larger;`: than the operating deficit reported for the period ending October, 1977, although the corporation has been s ceessful'in obtaining _additional financing,to address the.?prob em of the operating- deficit. MEMORANDUM f Date: January 4, 1979 To: Wayne S. Burggraaff City Manager From: Thomas A. Morgan, Jr. Director of Public Safety Subject: LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL INVESTIGATION THE GODFATHER, INC. Pursuant to the provisions of Richfield City Ordinance 11.06, the Public Safety Department has conducted the required investigation with regard to the application for the renewal of the liquor license for The Godfather, Inc. The only significant organizational change that has occurred during the past year with regard to The Godfather, Inc., has been the appointment of a new manager, Mr. Michael Scanlon. V A routine background investigation of Mr. Scanlon revealed no negative findings. • During the past year the applicant has had a minimal experience of re- ported police incidents. In 1978, only three incidents were reported to the Police Division of.the Public Safety Department. One of these incidents involved the theft of a vehicle from the parking lot, another involved a theft from a vehicle which was in the parking lot, and the third incident involved a theft within the establishment itself. Dur- ing 1977, there were only four incidents reported to the Police Division of the Public Safety Department. As of this date, the Public Safety Department has received financial statements for only nine of the past twelve months. You willrecall that the liquor license renewal approved by the city council in December, 1977 contained a stipulation that monthly financial reports be filed by the applicant. When the original liquor license for the The Godfather, Inc. was issued in 1977, the Public Safety Department expressed a concern that the proposal seemed to be under - capitalized for the nature and scope of the business venture. Since the business opened, they have experienced a regular and continued increase in the amount of their operating deficit. According to the financial statement furnished to the Public Safety Depart - ment dated October 31, 1978, the operating deficit amounted to $136,481. On October 31, 1977, the operating deficit was reported at $51,134. While it may not be unusual to expect an operating deficit at the time a business venture such as this is originated, I am concerned with the size of the existing deficit. It should be noted with regard to this matter that the applicant has apparently been successful in obtaining additional financing to deal this operating deficit with which with problem. January 4, 1979 Page Two In conducting our review of the financial situation of the applicant we have relied heavily on financial data furnished by the applicant which we have been unable to verify. The monthly financial statements which the council required the applicant to furnish the Public Safety Depart - ment are frequently out of date by the time they are received. While the statements are apparently prepared by certified public accounting firm, the statements themselves are unaudited. To the limited extent to which we have been able to verify various parts of the applicants fin - ancial statements we have not found them to be inaccurate. Beyond these issues of concern regarding the corporation's financing, we have found no basis on which to recommend a denial of the liquor license renewal application for The Godfather, Inc. TAM /lie l TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 16.54. A TRANSITORY ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR PARK ACQUISITION AND BETTERMENT CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the special revenue fund for acquisition and betterment of public parks and playgrounds, such improvements being capital improvements for which the City would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2. The sum of $335,000 is hereby authorized to be paid from the special revenue fund for such purposes. Section 3. The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council resolution. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this day of 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk a � 1 T r, ;OF RICHFYELDr` MINNESOTA ffice of C .ty:Manager" Couriil. Letter No.. therGi 1,UJ-41.1.1LLUlll. <: ,UL, - :UW.l.7 ";FiVU ".71:11Lj 011111 .CCCl.1GYG" !rs . chfield,Hous`ng "and Redevelopment �. in '1973. At'—t. hat time the' city c. .ve council members" "should constitu. Athority= was o fire year to al trms have ante {with its r: to 1 ms with the' e. c'oiinissioner ,is er epires on missioner A.P." t "ion with his is, necessary ,- • Honorable, Mayor and s iL itj-on to The iclude.M Lien, )r reapio ,C,h,f, fe,:ld. mbets ,Ject�: Flay lcahhling co nu 193 9 &:term whin Manager. Co . ci. 1 Let'ter No.,:. terms- will expirq.,,In January, I Mr, Joe . : Nor.: ,Robert L he does � not wish`.:ilo . e cons ideri th::, Mr.'. Ahl quist hi ng considered i. r i n 4nz n F tter' are appi icatAns wb,, have had cil, P19 C6 issi on.. pp 0. in en,� s s'sion-.has, thkee . terms h 16 i-i will 1 e x p i r o k ourth; V acancy r e s u ltjng, , from :a resi , _w! il;1-1,1 expire. ! in .ar- JanuX,,j 1980. terms- will expirq.,,In January, I Mr, Joe . : Nor.: ,Robert L he does � not wish`.:ilo . e cons ideri th::, Mr.'. Ahl quist hi ng considered i. r i n 4nz n F tter' are appi icatAns wb,, have had 1 Date Feb 8. 1c79 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENTI ' = �- �hf ►�;�!�t anaa. NAME Lutes Davi d Pail Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 6645 7—i'1 l i o4 Ave ,o Richfield eld n2� Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. PHONE: Home APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: City Business Zip Code .Planning Commission 1 Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission 2 Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: I have been a resident of Richfield for 18 ,years. 1=1y interests and course work has centered around local - overnment and the -problems it faces Planning is eruciadl to maintain a hiph quality of life. The needs of older citizens & Handicapped will require greater responsiveness in the future. I!feel I can make a• meaningful contribution on either committee. CIVIC; PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: hTember, Citizen Leapme.yamber of the State and Local Fiscal Relations Committee) Junior Achievement- active in the program for the.last.seven years Iriinnesota Leg7islature- Conducted research for Representative Ann Gltrni a Date APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME �LEVINS /�IC �R/ L- I 0 l� Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS WAsS &t g jj AVE SO City Street No. C y Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code .PHONE Home 0 �O 6 S d b Business 3% APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission X Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission Advisory Board of Health Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving,: 0 D CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: GL lY� �ri3 t v� a� 04 I. n , - -A I - 0 McMgER 1.iSzN SS AND F?^JA�sCE COMHZS%Za,J 04K VbV6 C1frNE AA/ 479 + tF*AD &'9 S 00,7 DA LE yM rA VZcc - cNATiZ SFA)A-rC STS -T2ZC7- 3 Tn1D6QE.vA��T- /�EPiiQCZ�ANS e PLEASE RETURN TO: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 6700 Portland Avenue....._.- C Y r�r RICHFIELD ICr TICPr � V FOR INDIVIDUALS DEC 7 ; x d O m 7 APPL n rtVF MUNICIPAL ADVISOR`,' COMMISSIONS OR rOM��iI�' `'�S ,� 1 y 1x,;78 tiJ; I, Committee or commission for which application is being made Planning Commission` 2, Name john Manthey 3. Residence address 6344 James Avenue Richfield MN.____ s No. ry. c. S _.mat r�i�yT to 4. Business address .Anoka- Hen..e i )n pir!c 121 ,High School Tz- her F''ng age Lcy Address Position Held W 6. i s 8. f 9. Date of birth DecPmhPr Month Date Year Local organizational memberships and affiliations; a. Richllels� -.F' .at.i on_,A�i MHnn innci. rrom i�z'� b. R ch i el d F der ti nn of TA rhr�ra f„� ,,o„eQ l C. Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this Municipal Committee and why you are interested in serving. As a Richfield resident for 32 years an, as a home owner for the past 21 �rPar�__ T -feel I! have a significant interest in insuring _ thR_ continued_ vi abil ty'nf 1i hfi P1 d qS a comma nt.3r tn l i va in- T fnal 4-h pt •.t; t r. c0 W1. bhe Part ofe the city government will allow this to hapxren. :,G fnr PxperJ erica' T took spArAral _pol . sci . no irsP.s - at. Aug chrir r` 1 ® t1ni y ,.,� ;+ "' a , �_ .,.,_.� =a. an.cLt}i � $i-- n�t�Pse� with city planning and its affect -,on the cor-rimunity. I" dm * -r- much at_ara of whit -typ_f�-s of things are currRntly going on in the community and what is neaded. Lisf the names of three perscre who are thoroughly acq,aa %�ted with your quay :::itions Name Occupation Address p =? 1. Dr. BY_l1C ,�nc?eraQn — - -. _ ..ar+'nnnl _ .�iChfi el d Schnnl_S ._Q'.nj 'J_r.,.�.�� 2 LPo Po ehlil ng 74� 1'- }'^ -c- -u 1-103- i,.Duane Wold TAach -r 7 Mu Signature of applicant Date January 20, 1978 r APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD o� . ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT AIvi�E. ,�aTT FRANK T. Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 7126 -12th Ave. So. Richfield, .MN 55423 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home 866 -3659 Business 339 -6376 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission XXX Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. XXX Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: 1. Accounting and financial profession with some experience in Fund Accounting. 2. Interested in becoming actively involved in community planning. 3. Many years of activity in organized sports. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Member of American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, Minneapolis Athletic Club '} Date February < (3, 1978 r APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTM � �C3 NAME Taft John I Last First HOME ADDRESS 68ao mhnmas AZrP Win,, Richfield 55421 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE Planning Commission 1 Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. 2 Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: Although T have nPZrPr sPrvPd nn a.nx nrJ nr nnmmi c�i nn � T hPl i Pvp ha.± my l i fP —1 and raci dornir and l q76 grerbya.ti on from Ri nl fi Pl rl -rilh lie Schnnlz can add an important dimension to an,5c commi_�sinn nn y {hi h T might servo- Berm ng on a nommi nr-i nn , T 'hPI i P -NrP ! v,i l l rn_ inforce my studies in pol, sci, and economics and effective• and informed citizen as taell. CIVIC,- PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: I a.m currently _a. member of the Citizens' Lea -g Date APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAM I G /V AN Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home �tp(O �� Business 3 Qg�� APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped. Advisor Board of Health Pp Y Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving:. akV%- 4i (Ct K. I A rv,r 5om.e- k..' .e U- ` e Lati1� L4_011 aLa__ 014 A. I _a cc Plot. ds-0 V t V sSc�cS, - ,,:.Q. co,w� CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: -k -V\,- U- vt 4,--1: ge " pit ►� � � k S �r Council Letter hio. 7 - 2 - January 8, 1979 Staff Findings. The staff has reviewed[the proposal against these zoning ordinance requirements and found the following: 1.- The restaurant use :would be, in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; 2:: The restaurant use, would not result in undue traffic hazards or. :congestion on surrounding ,streets . The use is established on'the site and no additional' traffic Will be� ,generated; 3. Some traffic exits the parking area by using the alley to the north of-the site. This results in ' automobile headlights shining onto residential properties to the north of the site. Complaints have been received also about cars sliding across the alley onto the residential property during the winter -, 4. Adequte setbacks are maintained; and 5. Adequate off - street parking space is.available to Patrons and . employees,,; although the 'total .parking, on the site 'is eight spaces short of what city guidelines indicate should be provided. .'However, the hours-of operation and peak use of the four businesses`on the site do not .coincide,; and its appears that the existing spaces will adequately meet the parking needs as long as the.existing uses of the building and the hours of operatio do not change. Staff 'Recommendation It is the recommendation of the staff that the special use permit be 'issued with he following stipulations: I. That a solid fence. with.a minimum height; of three I feet be.' constructed from the back of the building to the west property line to screen adjacent residences fr m automobile headlights and to prevent.automobiles from exiting onto the alley. 2. That seating of.the' restaurant be limited to t e existing 54 seats to insure that sufficient parking: spa es will be available. 3. That the restaurant not open for business befo e 4:00 p.m. daily., to insure that sufficient parking-is available for uses in the building. 'ommission ,revi?ewed this matter; :fit the Decemx s the recommendation .i�f.the- ,Flagn- ngiC,ommiss �.ndation Respectfully- submitted; J l 90' 30' ' VACANT Lemay 40' Gift �\Il 206\ .1208 _� 0 \ in' f01111r9lII' CQ N O N 18' E. 66th ST. PORTION 0P BLDG. OCCUPIED BY RESTAURANT. N Scale; I °= 30' SPECIAL USE S. K. E. E. 1506- E. 66th ST. K. S. KIT Crime i T A KEE OUT CCUNTE s r xE•� kt } a C. R30Ni' S PIZZA bb to St. t FLOOR PL N ��- V ,'a of � � Seay • ��n- 11 booths of 1t q 5 tables of 2 F Total seats - 54 tip. r a aY.i�}r y 1 + i7K N F! ' L f JUKE BOX - s - i. iH '.December 11, 1978 " t PLANNING DEPARTMENT r� f1T1 ld Minnesota City of Richfi e , Regarding: Special Use Permit - 06 E. 15 .66th S_ree� {r" History o= the property w,� 10 5 Gentlemen: T;w The building at 1506 East 661[--h Street was built in 1960 fir �se as a cafe, barber shop and beauty shop. The cafe or4a4nally occuc�eu 1, 300 square feet and was operated by Michealis. Michealis sold the building to the present owner in 1962 and leased it back at that K ' :. time. Michealis continued to operate the cafe until May of 1965. room y4 <May of 1965 until July of 1968 the cafe was operated by three dif =er- 2rx t a ent owners (Ashley, Gloreoso and Stem) and the space reduce,-2 during these transitions to the present 990 square feet. `` xr _ - In July of 1968 Oscar Lindstrom took over the opera tion. o_ t::e ca -e and a year later expanded it to 1,300 square fees again. L- ndst_o:: operated the cafe until May of 1975 when he relocated to his presence :, ,V °facilities at 1120 East 66th Street. All of the operations from 1960 to 19.75 were non -con orming use. The restaurant stood vacant for 7 -1/2 months in 1975 until the present �Fa operator, Walter Szczeck, reopened it as a pizza carry -out restaurant in December 1975. The restaurant occupied 990 square fezt. The '4 other 300 square feet have been converted to a gift shop. The restaurant didn't generate adequate business as a carry -out business only to meet the operating expenses. Sit down business is necessary �lrk to make the restaurant functional. The restaurant seats a maximum of 54 and opens for business at P.,1. The other tenants in the building, a beauty shop, barber shr_,) and gift shop, all operate day time hours and close bet;,ce:n 5 P.".. anl% 6 P.M. Parking has not been a problem because the restaurant reaches its peak business after the other tenants are closed at o _Submitted b,, Kll4rt` Sinith�- llo S_ -ality 15 Jo cil t0, r� fps RA 4 ZI ;,a3..z• i. 20 ,. ; 'T G! RARD ' - a. 2SZ Tca. 21 9 v 'a y_ �{ ;Q Pt�_KVadEW' 22 • ## O ru ,� ems'-` .Tj '� ,•_ ,^, z4�: A r• . ? t2+ . . t -,mw r »sue+ • 1� :sp� V S ^ `� �� y ^ �'ay ;ia ;, -i L L tq ' ems., •$ 4 5 t w {33 •: r't 3i •a A f�'1G'ir2•�. r7i. ►�S a - 3 fi Y R ��at•� ieV ` .:• :2 t t i - 3:�1� —Q�•�"� 'x Z; Q rq • • -� 1 K z: t ai '.'L..s 3a..; '. :Y'1 -•� c.^ a ji? ( jv3 �l •r:(�- x 'a�.ji z: .ry � `� :z.:' � r�{ -end %�, �.. 33 0 -- 1 -- -- a _ � r , O . Zr I z i t 135 i'•i Li ate•... ,; as -a. .,,M ` {' ', `' y:' e. =a' ilea 7 =� f• � s '`. { -� er ''`• ^� } ii�• � . � i _ ic•,( ~•it< "�� tt.al� � • caw r ` .4.0 lO.t� it14L _y ilt •lt._ Li A - a` t: :i i• Ls w a EAST °. 67th 111 y� iii^'. �.b) h � ti. o {•.' ;;t -� ' ai a .a COMMERCIAL SINGLE FA MI ILY RESIDENTIAL +. ��" CHURCH I�i.69 r7i. ►�S a J ieV ` .:• 1� � � Ill �• z i t 135 i'•i Li ate•... ,; as -a. .,,M ` {' ', `' y:' e. =a' ilea 7 =� f• � s '`. { -� er ''`• ^� } ii�• � . � i _ ic•,( ~•it< "�� tt.al� � • caw r ` .4.0 lO.t� it14L _y ilt •lt._ Li A - a` t: :i i• Ls w a EAST °. 67th 111 y� iii^'. �.b) h � ti. o {•.' ;;t -� ' ai a .a COMMERCIAL SINGLE FA MI ILY RESIDENTIAL +. ��" CHURCH e 120 y 5. f f ='� t9 '�►' :tEt p. 33.0 0 xNfi�� r >ss), EAST ~c bo \ c � t r EAST 1Q' f" h jt1~ 0 3.)5 )� 4f �t14 r ''a� jeoo i9"o M r •3 Zn :c , 4 co Lit +134.2 - 20 : ., — � 4 ^ \ -1 , mot) 3► , ,t t i .Y, 10 r 0544 r +' 1))A4 3; , 5 w t i $. i ' `i . j0 '^ W 10 ? i 114 s �s 4 t I C�� :: GENERAL COMMERCIAL CJ j e 120 y 5. f f ='� t9 '�►' :tEt p. 33.0 0 xNfi�� r >ss), EAST ~c bo \ c � t r EAST 1Q' f" h jt1~ • r ling. Map ,� V I hK U 1� °- -' -4 -. I 3 � 4 u '' .6 Ali as i3 ►.. - - ' 34S 34 eau 1W. -- 5 i< z ° v a a t w C 1ST. sc— a G ry - -, f' . Q e 9L r - ii. x.',.0)5 i 0 3.)5 )� 4f �t14 r ''a� jeoo i9"o M r • r ling. Map ,� V I hK U 1� °- -' -4 -. I 3 � 4 u '' .6 Ali as i3 ►.. - - ' 34S 34 eau 1W. -- 5 i< z ° v a a t w C 1ST. sc— a G ry - -, f' . Q e 9L r - ii. x.',.0)5 i 0 0 67 th � t'i �, • 91° p N r Zn :c b i 3 133 40 JOt co Lit � .J • r ling. Map ,� V I hK U 1� °- -' -4 -. I 3 � 4 u '' .6 Ali as i3 ►.. - - ' 34S 34 eau 1W. -- 5 i< z ° v a a t w C 1ST. sc— a G ry - -, f' . Q e 9L r - ii. x.',.0)5 i ;0 .50 i I 1 I W Q 0 0 67 th Flo » 45 a j b i 3 133 40 JOt co Lit � .J - -1 f f ^ \ -1 , mot) 3► � rd- i .Y, 10 r 0544 r +' 1))A4 ac a 8 `' 3 14 ;0 .50 i I 1 I W Q )0 50 0 0 67 th Flo » 45 a j b i 3 133 40 JOt )0 50 0 0 67 th i co Lit � .J - -1 f f ^ \ -1 , mot) 3► � rd- i .Y, � ..o ,`JJit ,'i,` 1 I i i f , -5 ' `i . j0 '^ W 10 ? i r 0 0 67 th co Lit � .J - -1 ^ \ -1 , mot) 3► � rd- i .Y, � ..o ,`JJit ,'i,` 1 t GENERAL COMMERCIAL CJ j -ilf 14 �: .�JiD 3 41.o 42 C SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 00 4 )° )'f i i y io too ao j ,'' f3 N 0 4 ? e. -- . -�� t� l•. aa�a t d� Yta lnr ,nwsx � �3G.i �- � anl•x,.ox,xa. - �� s�e:J��ss-'"'a� ixvt•lL "gM;l'i. __ 7w MM ,'ifsx _ lw i)r•M M � . . O r^#, - '_1_�- .�4ltllgl ".do5fYr ;L lo Y1 yd }S'1"S inerat' ti^ 3 ��ta+ � yF r-r4`G'11r�, riy � C o ;�r ehensive development plan for the city of richfieid LAND USE: District description density principal uses Cumbination of multiple Industrial dwellings, office, research Multiple Mixed Land Use High industrial, hotel, motel, Shopping Area institutional, and retail Mixed Land Use High /Medium High /Medium Medium Medium High Low Low commercial Combination of office, institutional, light and research oriented industrial, retail commercial, and multiple dwellings Combination of office, retail commercial, entertainment and eating establishments, small comparison shopping and service businesses, institutional, limited cultural, recreational facilities, and multiple dweilings Combination of single family dwellings, multiple dwellings, townhouses, and neighborhood conyenience commercial Light and research oriented industrial uses. Multiple units with related accessory uses. Grocery, drug, hardware stores. Single family or two family units and accessory uses compatible with single or two family units Public parks and 'open space Public schools Churches or church - related facilities Other public, quasi - public, or private institutional facilitie Major arterial thoroughfare adapted by th• city of richfiold this 151h day of JanU ar y ,19 73 Central Business District Mixed Mixed Land Use Mixed Land Use Industrial Multiple Convenience Shopping Area Single Family Residential COMMUNITY FACILITIES: ,TRANSPORTATION: High /Medium Medium Medium High Low Low commercial Combination of office, institutional, light and research oriented industrial, retail commercial, and multiple dwellings Combination of office, retail commercial, entertainment and eating establishments, small comparison shopping and service businesses, institutional, limited cultural, recreational facilities, and multiple dweilings Combination of single family dwellings, multiple dwellings, townhouses, and neighborhood conyenience commercial Light and research oriented industrial uses. Multiple units with related accessory uses. Grocery, drug, hardware stores. Single family or two family units and accessory uses compatible with single or two family units Public parks and 'open space Public schools Churches or church - related facilities Other public, quasi - public, or private institutional facilitie Major arterial thoroughfare adapted by th• city of richfiold this 151h day of JanU ar y ,19 73 y,k�4i, (k) All exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated a� `as not to be a nuisance to adjacent properties. (1) If the station or garage is to be located in a shopping center or other integrated development, it will be in architectural harmony with the rest of the center or development. (m) The station or garage will not provide for the outdoor operation k of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or service pits, or the outdoor F display of merchandise; but the outside underground storage of gasoline and k' other petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary display of merchan- dise within 4 feet of the station building is permitted. (n) If the station or garage is not to be located on a county road or state highway, it shall not be operated between, the hours o* 11:OOJ a y, P p.m. and 6 :00 a.m. of the following day. (o) If the site is at an intersection, provision will be made for an unobstructed area on the site, adjacent to and within 50 feet of the in- a tersection free of vehicles signs other than a displays i g ( pedestal si „� or`other materials which tend to obstruct intersection visibility. 3 e 'Subd. 4. Regulations Relating to Hotels, Motels, Restaurants and Cafes. A special use permit shall not be -ranted for a hotel motel restaurant or cafe unless the council finds that the proposed use will be in substantial compliance with the following standards: (a) The use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic con gestion' either on the public streets adjacent to the site or on the parking ' „areas on or adjacent to the site or on streets adjacent to the site unto -,which traffic to or from the site is channeled. (b) Adequate provision will be made, through the use of building '; setbacks, buffer areas, screening, and exterior treatment or placement of the building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust, and am other r sources of nuisance or annoyance to adjacent properties. s� (c) Adequate provision will be made through the use of building setbacks, screening, landscaping, exterior design and placement of the VV"'N, building on the site to avoid noise, glare, fumes, dust and any other sources ` of nuisance or annoyance to users, or patrons of the facility, _(d) Adequate off- street parking space is available for patrons and . Mi employees. (e) If liquor is to be sold on the premises (1) of the !,property abuts upon a main thoroughfare of the city, (2) access to all off- street parkin;; '! space is from internal driveway systems and is not directly from public streets, and (3) provision is made for well - designed vehicular stacking space allowing for an efficient and orderly flow of traffic from the ',site onto adjacent main thorouhfares of the city. "Main thorouh,hfares of the city”, as used in this paragraph, means a street designated as a state trunk highway or a service drive adjacent to the state trunk highway, a stag' aid highway, .. county aid highway, a county highway, or a street which is so loCated as to serve, primarily, commercial development. (Pill 1976 -10) 4/26/7, (f) The proposed facility will provide an aesthetic appearance whic's: will not detract from or conflict with the existing or proposed architectural ` form of buildings in the same area. (g) The use will not create in excessive burden on publ';ic parlcs, public open- space, streets, or utilities renu rinv, public services which are proposed to serve the i;icility. 4/26/76 68.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO`A i c.� �x the comprehensive (h) The proposed development will not conflict with N develo ment ran of the city. p ,Subd. 5 'He' ht Regulations. In a "C -2" district no bu.tilding shall hereafter Aube erected or structurally altered to exceed three storiI6s of 40 feet in a� height, subject to the modifications and exceptions provided in Section 3.39 R. this chapter. W, ubd. 6. Lot Areas and Yard Requirements. (The same requirements shall be f ;observed for the "C -2" district as are provided for a "C -1 ". district in Section 3.32 of this chapter.) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subdivision the sage minimum* req irements shall be observed for "C -2" district as are provided for �a "C -1" district in Section 3.32. 'A'g soline service station may construct a canopy extended into the buirlding setback area of the lot on which it is located provided that such "canopy complies with the following regulations: �L (a) It must be designed and constructed to serve as protection for �=customers and attendants from inclement weather. r '•; (b) It may extend into the front yard area distance of 10 feet, as �imeasured from the centerline of the gasoline pump island closest to the street "�`��lot line but in no instance closer than five feet from this lot line. � `(c) Only one canopy shall be permitted at each service station, unless it is located on a corner lot. "M .Z4 (d) It shall be designed and constructed as an integral part of the } -main servic station building and shall extend from such building. t (e) The .canopy shall not be constructed to a height exceeding sixteen feet: Yr� (f) The canopy shall not be designed for use nor shall it be used as -a location for any business or advertising sign of a permanent or to ^oorary constructio . (g) Lighting located on the canopy shall, be designed as an integral `;part of the canopy providing that fixtures shall not extend below the bottom urface of the canopy structure and shall be beamed downward. (h) The canopy shall not be used as the location for li hts or q� }rte lighting fi tures used to illuminate the service station building, off- street arking are s or other areas not directly beneath the canopy. Flashing lights �z and rotatin lights shall not be located on or attached to the canopy. x, (i) No canopy, whether it conforms with the foregoing regulations or shall be constructed in a location or manner which will bloc!: or obscure the vision f automobile traffic on any street adjacent to the service station or he vision of an automobile entering or leaving the service station. .(Bill 1972- ) 3/13/72 Subd. 7. P4trsuant to the provisions of Section 3.40 the co::ncil ^i �� ,rant an exception o an adjustment to any of the requirements of this section w here the council finds that the project encourages a more creative acid efficient approach to the use of land and to en\ -ironmental design than is provided under the strict pplication of the zoning regulations of the City, provided that the project is con sistent with the ; urposes of such re,t!lations. (Bill 1972-6) 3/13/7' 3/13/72 ORDINANCE CODE 6S.2 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA We, the undersigned, being, owners of imneciate adjoining land as above described do hereby concur with the Spe:iai use as r�questee. Signature of Owners Address Legal Description 11A° `0 �.�Tit �t': 1�6At c� �crc� I,z,3.ySGtnC.��c.Ynra "-r, ' Low* to 1�1�XA.0*1W1mC"-JbU 46 ........... /5 -�' � Grr -.►.t fir. tC� �. t W�U i 0=.a Me"Acm cs S ��..t•sC$al iq (34.44r- s Noia n oC 6-' kS. 1. t3 u4s .Y REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT OF FOR PURPOSE OF s t r Do&jAj y3-Aclt��iT Legal Description: L-ors !3 nmr t4 f2—w-ew-+4 S , We, the undersigned, being, owners of imneciate adjoining land as above described do hereby concur with the Spe:iai use as r�questee. Signature of Owners Address Legal Description 11A° `0 �.�Tit �t': 1�6At c� �crc� I,z,3.ySGtnC.��c.Ynra "-r, ' Low* to 1�1�XA.0*1W1mC"-JbU 46 ........... /5 -�' � Grr -.►.t fir. tC� �. t W�U i 0=.a Me"Acm cs S ��..t•sC$al iq (34.44r- s Noia n oC 6-' kS. 1. t3 u4s L44 PETITION MAP 4�s �1' rn 1 //1 / ---, C; tv "1 11 . T�6/3�' -- '"u) - 14 0 4• tn flt� 'An 1�4 77 u-; 14 0 La 0 10 > LS4 001 10 J= - 4 t h '0 j 134.E 0 12-54 1 x 4. � is 3A.46 B4 4 8 134.N. .lm.% A. . —j lu 1 134.42 14 V -134.3 LIJ, 134.3E BkV I_ 43 5 !34 it 7 41• 13,41t' I IG lu 1; 15 10 34.45 '. 134, I'l 14 14 34.(A 44 0 10 11 4.0 PETITION MAP 4�s �1' rn 1 //1 / ---, C; tv "1 11 . T�6/3�' -- '"u) - 14 0 4• tn flt� 'An 1�4 77 u-; 14 0 La 0 10 > LS4 001 10 J= - 4 t h '0 j 134.E 0 12-54 1 x 4. � is 3A.46 B4 4 8 134.4. 4 IG A. . —j lu 1 134.42 18 -134.3 LIJ, 134.3E - 64134,� I_ 43 5 oe 7 41• 34.r 1; 15 10 134.1 '. 134, I'l 14 tt 0 11 N 0 19 134.0 I 0 0 10 11 4.0 r 134�00 34. 0 PETITION MAP 4�s �1' rn 1 //1 / ---, C; tv "1 11 . T�6/3�' -- '"u) - 14 0 4• tn flt� 'An 1�4 77 u-; 14 0 La 0 10 > LS4 001 10 J= - 4 t h '0 j 134.E 0 12-54 1 x 4. � 19 1 B4 4 8 134 -4S IG 3 4-4 1 134.42 tN*R' A RD "4 4 134.3E - 64134,� I_ 43 5 �24 7 41• 14 PAP: Y.4 EW7. im is • 13 41 134.19 $ 134 IT '. 134, I'l M Or. 14 0 11 N 0 19 134.0 I 0 0 10 017 GI P A RD Q4 •5 's -Y" 3 `� ,� 14, 4 13.4 t-, :�!�4 45 14 PA P*KVl EW, 4� li4.4 0 13* 0 0 Il J it allv 34,(.5 0 5 0 0 C? -Y" 3 `� ,� 14, 4 z :�!�4 45 ?14.43 4� li4.4 0 W:14 4 0G )� I_ 43 5 134 '15: 7 41• $ 10 7 to In X09 Al .1c 14 UL ';4 11 4.0 r I 34. C A e-, cl. 4.k I e-IN 1, • -Y" 3 `� ,� 14, 4 z 15 4 a 13 W:14 4 40 5 Ui 7 41• $ 10 7 to In X09 — 134 d 4z 4l r 1, • -Y" 4 z 15 3 3 ;P W:14 4 40 5 Ui 7 41• $ 10 Il e 7 A, IQ 134,o i 34.o 1, • -Y" 4 z 15 3 114 La 40 5 Ui 7 41• $ 10 UL ';4 077 z 15 3 114 La 40 5 I z S UL 9 r 36 1343' r 133.1 La I z S UL 114 C43 �.g -te a_ SIGNATURES ON PETITION r. J, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office .of City Manager Counci3 Letter No. 6 Agenda January 8, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members, of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subjec Request for Variance to Frontyard Setback Requirements, 6417 Xerxes Avenue Mr. >Lloyd Hope is proposing to construct a four -foot addition 'onto the front of the existing garage attached to his house, loca- ted at 6417 Xerxes Avenue. The existing garage is approximately -12 feet by 19 feet. Mr. Hope, proposes to lower the floor of the garage by 20 inches and construct new footings under the north wall > of the garage. The proposed addition will provide additional space for a car, additional storage space,..as well as provide space for construction of steps for a door into the porch located behind the garage.' The proposed addition would reduce the frontyard setback of the house from 35 feet to 31 feet. The average frontyard set. .back on the block is 35 feet. Zoning Ordinance Requirements Section 3.30, subdivision 4, paragraph 2 -of the zoning ordin- ance requires a minimum frontyard setback of 30 ,feet, subject to the modifications in Section 3.39.. Section 3.39, subdivision 2, paragraph _2 requires that, on developed blocks, the. required front - yard setback is the average existing setback on the block. Section 3.40, subdivision 2 of the zoning ordinance allows the city council to grant variances where strict;enforce�nent of the ordinance will cause 'undue hardship because of circumstances unique to an individual property, and when it.is demonstrated that the .proposal will meet the.spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. Section 3.40, subdivision 6 sets forth three conditions which must be present on`the site in order for a variance to be granted. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed the proposal against the three con -' ditions which must be met in order for a variance to be granted. and found the following: 4�:tY Council Letter No., 6 -2- January 8, 1979' c 1.: That there ,are or conditions „special.circumstances affecting the particular . land, building or Aise referred to: "in -the application not common to other'gropertes in this distr.ic t'or similar''districts. ;.` No special conditions are present on' the site,::iThe existing I garage is smaller than the standard sin le'car: g =ara e Which :is _ _ now being built, but is similar in size to other garages in; the:` ,neighborhood and the city, 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the,preservation and °enjoyment of substantial :property rights. The variance is not necessar y to protect property rights. Denial of the variance w 11 :not prevent the applicant :tioml.using the property for the existing °single family residential<purpose 3 That the granting of the application will not materially or adversely, affect the health and safes 'of 2ersons residing or working in he neighborhood of the property of The: a pp_ li- cant and will not be material :lv detrimental to °the public ' welfare or injurious to. property or, improvements in the r neeghborhood . The ro osal' would not be' detrimental to the p p public welfare. The proposed.addition. would have a setback of 31 feet, :which is one foot greater than is normally required-in residential districts. It would:not.extend our far enough to;.detract. from the appearance of the.block or to obstruct the view of the neighbors. The addition: would not result -in living areas of the house being any closer, to the : ega -five: impacts . of " the' high traffic volume on :Xerxes Avenue' Staff Recommendation While the staff feels that the proposal would not be`detrim- ental, it is the'. staff's,recommendation that the variance-be denied 'since the three conditions which must be pies nt on the site in order to grant -a variance do not exist. Planning. Commission Recommendation The lannin commission reviewed this matter at P g their Decem- ber 27, 1978 meeting.. It is the recommendation of the planning commission that the requested variance be granted.` Respectfully s fitted, l Wayne S . Bu:rggraaf city Manager WSB /eja : PC: Planning &:Redevelopment'Director VARIANCE — Add'n. 6417 XERXES XERXES AVE: 66' to M Prop. add'n.12' t g5�6417 5 c Exist Residence NI Scale: 1 30' 1 1 1 i 66' E. KS. 12/13/78 I Z CL LL v /1l U !D M N W Z W - O U7 d O CL X O W OJ co N N ,_:� � ��;:.� -_ }<: L I z r .+ �� i3 �k {} ?r�� -kx � �'s - �� r�.a I � � .. _v� ��T1 N Z rn r m D -I ,.� . Z SETSAUK NiHr 64TH ST -P 35� O 35 0 O Ln .P 35 C, as o a X 35' m x x m U) rn 35, N A W m rn 35, N co CA 35' W Ul -P 35, 35' .A CD 65TH ST r t 3.30. USE REGULATIONS FOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R) Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. In the "R" District, unless otherwise provided in this chapter no building or land shall be used and no,,building shall here- after be erected or structurally altered except for one'or more of the following uses: (1) Single family dwellings and their accessory buildings. (2) Repealed 2/1%74. (Bill 1973 -21) (3) Home occupations. (4) It is found and determined that the occupancy of a single family res_- deuce in a single family residence neighborhood by a number of unrelated persons tends to disrupt and disturb the character of such neighborhood; that such oc cupancy'tends to adversely affect property valuations of the otner single family residences in such neighborhood; that such occupancy tends to involve patterns of living and conduct which are different from and offensive and annoying to the residents of other single family residence structures in the neighborhood; that such occupancy tends to create special police problems for the city; that such occupancy is more in the nature of a multiple residential use of property and should more appropriately be in the multiple residence areas of the city; and that such occupancy of _a residential unit in a multiple residence zone of the city is less likely to result in such adverse influences or such adverse influ- ences will be totally absent in such multiple residence zones. It is unlawful for a single family residence structure in the residential areas to be occupied by a group of individuals, exceeding three in number, who are not related by blood, marriage or adoption. Subd. 2. Uses by Special Use Permit. The following uses are permitted only .upon the procurement of special use permits as provided in Section 3.41 of this chapter: (1) Churches, libraries, museums, schools, memorial buildings (including name plates and bulletin boards meeting the requirements of this code). (2) Clubs, golf courses, lodges, fraternity or sorority houses, without services to the public customarily carried on as a business. (3) Hospitals, clinics and other buildings used for the treat=ment of human ailments. (4) Philanthropic and charitable institutions other than those heretofore mentioned. (5) The keeping of more than two boarders by a residence family. (6) Public utility installations. Subd. 3. Height Regulations. No building shall hereafter be or or structurally altered in the residence district to exceed 35 feet or " 1i2 stories in height subject to modifications and exceptions provided in Soction 3.39 of this chapter. Subd. 4. Lot urea, Fronta,-e and Yard Requirements. Tile following requirements shall be observed by all bULldin-S in the "R" district here liter orceted or structurally altered, subject to Lilo modLticutions provLded in Suction 3.39 of this chapter: (1) Lot urea. LUer ;' des L, ;tied Lor the housing— of Ono iam'Lly, to- gether with its acce�:Snr`.' Ii lill.: ;i ;`.3, tillall be 1,,1C1tC -i1 ,)n a lot Lil owiiersil-•l havin.9 an area of not L,-Ss titan :,,000 -square toot incLudin.: the id ;accnt one -sal_ Of the abutt'in:; aILIC . 2111, 74 ORDINANCE CODE 64 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA r • • (2) Front Yard. Each building shall have a front yard of not less than 30 feet subject to modified requirements contained in Section 3.39 of this chapter. (3) Side Yard. Each building shall have two side yards, one on each side of the building. The side yards in the case of 1 1/2 story or smaller buildings shall have a width of not less than five feet and in the case of large buildings shall have a width of not less than ten feet, subject to modifications and spec - ifications provided for in Section 3.39 of this chapter. Each & elliriz located on a corner lot in such district shall have a side yard on the side abutti upon a street of not less than the minimum front yard depth requir==t on t_ e adjoining interior lot but this shall not reduce the buildable vidth of any corner lot to less than 30 feet. (4) -Rear Yard. Each building shall have a rear yard equal to twenty percent of the depth of the lot to a maximum required depth of 25 feet. 3.31. USE REGULATIONS FOR MULTIPLE RESIDENCE (MR) DISTRICT Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. In the multiple dwelling district, unless other - wise specified in this chapter, the following uses are permitted: (1) Any use permitted in an "R" district, subject to the sai- -e conditions as are applicable to an "R" district. (2) Ztao family dwellings and their accessory buildings. (3) Multiple family structures NAien application is made therefor and dui- approved by the city council pursuant to the "Group Housing Development Protect" provisions of Section 3.37 of this chapter. Subd. 2. Height Regulations. No building shall be erected or structurally altered in the multiple dwelling district to exceed three stories in height, subject to the modifications and exceptions provided in Section 3.39 of this chapter. (Bill 1973 -4) 3/26/73 Subd. 3. Lot Area, Frontage, and Yard Requirements. The following minimum re- quirements apply to all buildings in the "MR" district hereafter erected or structurally altered subject to the modifications provided in Section 3.39 of this chapter. (1) Lot Area. Every building designed for the housing of one family shall. conform to the area requirements applicable to an "R" district. Every building designed for two families shall have a lot in one ownership having not less than 10,000 square feet. Every building designed for more than two families shall have a lot area as determined under the provisions of Section 3.39, Subd. 2 or this chapter. (2) Yard Requirements. Front, side and rear yard requirements sliall be the same in an "t-IR" district as in an "W' district, Subject to the modi,tic,lnois provided in Section 3.39 or Section 3.36 of this chapter. 3.32. USE RECUIIITI(:IS FOR 'TICiIDCPHOOD DUST',MSS (C -1) DIS`I,.WT Subdivision 1. Permitted Usoc. In the neighborhood business district, otherwise specified in this chapter, the following llses arc peratittcd: (1) Any use per- mittod Ln all "W' district or in district, upon Co[il- pliance with the llrocci:aral rC(ni111" `Glt'11C.`i for oncil Sucl), clLstrict !0rov1i:'d that: one family or C7,/0 f:1mi1 c:; l 111:iL, shall be ConStrnCtLd L11 this lii�trlCt :L the procurement of n 5 )eci:il l!sc perril t in accurdnllce :dtth Cile P1:0 IS10115 0L Section 3.41 of thi, 3/26/i3 ORDINANCE CODE 65 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Subdivision 1. Height, (1) In any district, public and semi- public buildings, schools and churches, hospitals and other institutions permitted iii the district may be erected to a height not exceeding 73 feet. The front, rear and side yards shall be increased one foot for each one foot by which the building exceeds the height limit hereinbefore' established for such district. (2) Upon acquiring of a special permit as provided in section 3.41 of this chapter, any building may be erected to a height exceedin that herei^ before specified for the respective district; 'out t'e total floor area of the building shall not exceed that possible for a building in _`te district erected within the height limit specified in t is chapter or a -ota' of 75 feet, whichever is the lower. (3) Subject to any other provisions of law, towers, gables, spires, penthouses, scenery lofts, cupolas, water tanks, similar structures and necessary mechanical appurtenances may be built and used to a greater heigi:t than the limit established for the district in which the building is located; with the following qualifications; (a) No such ,exception shall cover at any level more than fifteen percent in area of the lot nor have an area at the base greater than 1,60C! square feet. (b) No tower, gable, spire, or similar structure shall be used for sleeping or eating quarters or for any commercial purpose except one inci- dental to the permitted uses of the.main building. (c) No building or structure in any district shall ever exceed a maximum height of 150 feet, except that the height limitations of this code shall not apply to chimneys, church.spires, flag poles., monuments and radic towers, (4) When the average slope of a lot is greater than one foot rise or fa' -1 in swcn feet of distance from the established street elevation at the property line, one story in addition to the number permitted in the district in whi" the lot is situated shall be permitted on the downhill side of any builain if the height of the building is not increased above the limit specified for the district. Subd. 2. Yards. (1) For the purpose of computing front yard dimensions, measurements shall be taken from the nearest point of the front wall of the buildin- to the street line, subject to the following qualifications: (a) Cornices, canopies or eaves may extend into the required front- yard a distance of not exceeding two feet, si:: inches. (b) Fire escapes may extend into the required front yard a distance not exceeding four feet, six inches. (e) A landin;; place or uncovered porch m, ay extend into the require front yard to a distance: not exceeding sir: feet, if the landit ;Lace or porch has its floor no hi.�Jler r-1inn he entrance floor of the. LuiL iin_,. An open railing no higher than three feet may he placed around t,lcl nLace. (d) The above enumerated arcl, i tcc L,traI fcatures 7n i1_,.? ,:_:toad .T" J any side or rear :ard to the same: e:�:tonL, :i c ^t tl?;lt no norc!''I, LC'rralcc, C`r -0LItSLdC' SCa1rGJ.1V St1LlLl pC'iJ 'C'C r.C1r:' ::n li 'C' '. +_'C'L L(7 :!:? \' Si,o \' ;1rd ;lnd then in the C a5C 01 :111 O I( L((C s L:1 above and belu l ti?e iLk2p iii ..:) , _n..LL .a pori[1. ;ta ii7 or architectural 1_eatUCC r:CC'::CI I:LU;CC L:;1 i\'t;C .'.r,: "1c' 1 4; ti /'bS ORDINANCE CODE' CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA f except that (a) no wall, fence, or hedge more than our feet in reirht shall be constructed or pet -fitted on any front yard, (b) no wail, fence, or hedge more than eight feet in height shall be constructed or, .permitted on any rear yard, and (c) no wall, fence or hedge more than foyer feet in hei_ht shall be constructed or permitted on the rear yard of a corner lot which abuts upon a key lot, loser to the street than the front yard setback line of the kev lot. All posts on any fence located on or near the lot lane shall _ orn inside of the fence. The tertl "hedges" as used in c :is paranraac _U_i not include t ees. No walls, fences, hedges, trees or oCaer plants or struct,res shall be established or maintained on the front -card of anv corner lot in such manner as to obstruct visicn from the adjacent streets of -n—"c ap- proach'ing within 50 feet of the adjacent intersection. ?o wails - e.:ces, or hedges shall be constructed or permitted on any boulevard area or public right-of-way. (Bill 1970 -22) 7/27/70 (2) In any residential district where 25 or more of the lots in any block located i the same district, exclusive of tl:e frontage alon? the s:de of _ corner lot, have been heretofore improved with buildings of a character per- mitted in the district, the required front yard depth for the district shah be disregarded in the block and instead the front yard required on each lot in the block shall be of a depth not less than the a,erage dept: of t e front yards on the lots on which are located such existing buildings, to a �... of fifty feet. The same rule shall apply in any other district pro idea that u� (1) the minimum front yard otherwise established by this chapter shall be maintained in any commercial or industrial district facing upon an "R" district and (2) the fifty foot maximum shall not be applicable in any ' commercial or industrial district. A "block" as used in this oaraCraph, __ the area, regardless of size or shape, which faces a street and !-'Les between - the nearest two cross - streets. (Bill 1971 -1) 1/23/71 (3) On a corner lot adjacent to a key lot, the side vard on the street side of su h corner lot shall have a width at least equal to t11e front r of such ke7 lot, provided that this regulation shall not reduce the build - `able width of the lot to less than 30 feet. (4) In case a dwelling is located .on a lot so that its front and rear any side 1)t line, the dwelling shall be not less than 25 feet from the lot line. (5) A 2hurch, library, museflm, school or other memorial, institutional, or public bui ding; shall have a side yard of 25 feet on each side adjoininc a dwelling o vacant land in an "R" district. (6) In determining the depth of rear yard for an buildingwhore.tile rear yard- opens into an alley, one -half the wi.dLll of the alle"-, but not ten feet, may be considered as a portion of Life rear y ard - subjccL Lo the following qualifications: (a The depth of any rc`ar yard shaL1 be reduced by the application of Lhis exception. (b� If the doer on an %, huiLd:_n,; or irlpro,e:aent, excellL a tenco, o e::s toward an lle;, it siraLI not be erected or e- tablL;,hed c CorL'r of the all v than a dLstanco or _U ecL. (7) In commercial .flits Lr_a1 df� : ;L i t :r ;it .old real be used foi par!! Ln9'_ nro. Icc.."I 1:1;10 SLCiC use. 1, -3ii1 ORDINANCE CODE 73 CITY OF RICHFIELD, R1INNESOTA 1 ,Subd. 4. Use,of Existing hots. In an,. district where dwellings are a single family dwelling may be located on any lot or plat of of`-c:' j as of October 2, 1954, irrespective of its area or width; provided, however, that no lot shall be deemed to be less than 50 feet wide in any case. :Subd.'5. Conversion of Single Family Dwellings Prohibited. Notwithstandina any other_ provisions of this section, a one - family dwelling structure located in an "MR ", "C -1", or 11C -2" or "I" districts shall not be converted into or used as a two - family or multiple dwelling unless the owner thereof has firsc obtained a special permit in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 3.41 of this chapter. 3.40. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT A \TD APPEALS. Subdivision 1. Creation. The board created in this section is established in conformity with Minnesota Statutes, Section 4$2.354, Subdivision 2, and the F,.� „provisions to.which it refers. Subd. 2. Council_ Shall Act as Board; Powers. The council shall serve as the board created in this section. When the council is so acting, it has the following powers: (1)_ To hear and decide appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the enforcement of this part of this chapter. (2) To hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of this part :4” '.."In instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because Nrr :•of circumstances unique to the individual property under considerstion, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in P j ORDINANCE CODE 79.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, h11NNES07A R keeping with the spirit and intent of this part. The council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this part for property in zone where the affected person's land is located. The council may impose �� Y conditions 'n the granting o variances to insure compliance and to protect acent properties. 'r R Subd. 3. A plication for Adjustment-Fee. Application for any adjustment per- missible under this section shall be made to the chief inspector provisions of by written application. Anapplication for adjustment shall be accompanied by � �t of a .fee as provided in .Appendix D of this Code in addition to the .payment regular building fee, if any. (Bill 1977 -16) 8/8/77 ....... Subd. 4:. Public Hearing on Adjustment. Upon receipt of any application, the _ council may set a time and place for a public hearing on such application. At least ten days before the data of any such hearing, a notice of the hearing 'shall be published once in tha official newspaper. R Subd. 5. Requirements for Co.nliance. In all cases in which adjustments or variances are granted under tie provisions of this section, the council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary to insure com- �" pliance with the conditions designated in connection therewith. Subd. 6. Co ditions Upon Grant of Adjustment or Variance. Before granting an application or variance, the council must find: for an adjustment (1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the # ^particular land, building or use referred to in the application, not common to • other properties in this or similar districts. (2) That the granting of he applications is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial roperty rights. 4: (3) That the granting of he application will not materially and adversely= 3 affect the health 4 of the 'property or safety o of the applic E persons residing or working in the neighborhood nt and will not be materially detrimental to the r public welfa e. or injurious t property or improvements in the neighborhood. a At the hearing the applicant shall present a statement and evidence in such form as the city ay require to show these facts. Subd. 7. Orders. The counci shall within a reasonable time make its order ,cfr` deciding the matter and shall cause a copy of its order to be served by mail U on the petitioner. p p I Subd. 8. Record of Proceedin s. The council shall maintain a written record of its proce include minutes of meetings, its findings in dings which shall 1 E r cases before it, and a record of action taken on each matter before it including i the final order. { Subd. 9. Review by Plannin^ Aecncv. No decision shall be made bV the board oz: fore it until th K,- any matter b' plannin,; agency acting pursuant to its autliorit� v as set forth in part VII of this chapter shall first have had a reasonable op- _ "portunit}-, n t to exceed 60 days, to review and report to the council upon anl.• j matter refer ed to it by the ouncil. I� �F i l Al . 8/8/77 S �.,� ORDINANCE CODE gp CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA M�.qk, a� REQUEST FOR VARIANCE OF FOR PURPOSE OF 'Legal Description: Xl Tiy 7 5. k FYlr e, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above described, M do hereby concur with the variance as requested. Signature of Owners Address Legal Description Lor 5 , GLzz L 54 3 .d.. Vd 4 �r 9 C "ya, x�'fit }v�a '"L F _ +_ REQUEST FOR VARIANCE OF KJ Af TR �t< FOR PURPOSE OF _Legal Description: LYE "`__ - the undersigned, being owners f immediate adjoining land as above described, =� do hereby concur with the variance as requested. Y� s y Signature of .Owners Address Legal Description 4G 4_/ z� k 4' S 1 a i r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND BANKS AS DEPOSITORIES FOR THE INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS IN 1979 BE IT RESOLVED by.the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.66 and 118.17, municipal funds may be deposited in any Savings and Loan Association which has its deposits insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, and WHEREAS, the amount of said deposits may not exceed the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation insurance covering such deposits which insurance amount is presently $100,000, and WHEREAS, the deposit of City funds in Savings and Loan Associations and Banks would provide greater flexibility in the City's investment program and maximize interest income thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that it is in the best interests of the proper management of City funds that certain Savings and Loan Associations and Banks be designated as additional depositories for City funds for 1979. 2. The following Savings and Loan Associations and Banks are hereby • designated as additional depositories for municipal funds: First Federal Savings of Minneapolis 6445 Nicollet Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Twin City Federal Savings and Loan Marquette at 8th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Minnesota Federal Savings Knollwood St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55432 Home Federal Savings 500 West 98th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420 Home Federal Savings 6538 Penn Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 First National Bank of St. Paul 332 Minnesota Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2- 3. It is further found and determined that the purpose of such depository designation is to facilitate the proper and advantageous investment of City funds a d that such designation is not exclusive nor does it preclude the d posit of any City funds in,other officially designated depositories of the City. 4. The Treasurer is her by authorized to deposit City funds in any or all of the depositories herein designated up to the amount of $100,000, or such other amount as ma be subsequently permitted by law, such deposits to be in the form of deman accounts for Public Unit Savings Certificates purchased by the City, pay ble to the City of Richfield on the signature of the City Treasurer. Su (h deposits may be made and withdrawn from time to time b3 the Treasurer aE his best judgment and the interests of the City dictates. 5. The investment of funds and the reporting thereof pursuant to this resolution shall be conducted in accordance with established policies of the City regarding the investment of City funds. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this 8th day of January, 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Mor n City Clerk Loren L. Law Mayor • 1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE RICHFIELD BANK & TRUST COMPANY A DEPOSITORY OF FUNDS OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAR . 1979 AND APPROVING COLLATERAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: That, in accordance with law, the Richfield Bank & Trust Company be and hereby is designated a depository of the funds of the City of Richfield, subject to modification and revocation at any time by said City, and subject to the following terms and conditions The said depository shall not be required to give bonds or other securities for such deposits provided that the total sum thereof shall not at any time exceed in any depository the sums for which its deposits are insured under the Acts of Congress of the United States relating to insurance of bank deposits; but that in case such deposits in any such depository shall at any time exceed such insured sum, said depository shall immediately furnish bonds or other security for such excess according to law, approved by the City Council of said City. That said depository shall pay on demand all deposits therein; and shall pay all time deposits, at or after the end of the period for which the same shall be deposited, on demand. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be maintained a general account in which shall be deposited all moneys not otherwise specifically provided for. Checks on this account shall be signed by the following officers or their facsimile signatures: LOREN L. LAW, Mayor WAYNE S. BURGGRAAFF, Manager THOMAS J. MORAN, Treasurer BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED, that there shall be a daily interest savings - account. All withdrawals from said account will be for transfers,to the general checking account. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that collateral in the amount of $480,000 deposited for safekeeping at the Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, is hereby approved. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this) th day of January, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk fs RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE SUMMIT STATE BANK A DEPOSITORY OF FUNDS OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD FOR THE YEAR 1979 AND APPROVING COLLATERAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: That, in accordance with law, the Summit State Bank be, and hereby is designated a depository of the.funds of the City of Richfield, subject to modification and re- vocation at any time by said City and subject to the following terms and conditions: The said depository shall not be required to give bonds or other securities for such deposits provided that the total sum thereof shall not at any time exceed in any depository the sum for which its deposits are insured under the Acts of Congress of the United States relating to insurance of bank deposits; but not in case such deposits in any such depository shall at any time exceed such insured sum, said depository shall immediately furnish bonds or other security for such excess according to law, approved by the City Council of said City. That said depository shall pay on demand all deposits therein; and shall pay all time deposits, at or after the end of the period for which the same shall be deposited, on demand. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be maintained a general account in which shall be deposited all monies from liquor and swimming pool /ice arena operations. Checks on this account shall be signed by the following officers or their facsimile signatures: LOREN L. LAW, Mayor WAYNE S. BURGGRAAFF, Manager THOMAS J. MORAN, Treasurer BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be maintained a city payroll account. There shall be issued a single check bi- weekly for an amount equal to the bi- weekly city payroll, payable to the Director of Finance for deposits In such payroll account. Thereafter, the Director of Finance is authorized to issue payroll checks on said accounts bearing only his signature as city treasurer for all wages or salaries included in said bi- weekly payroll. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be a daily interest savings account. All withdrawals from said account will be for transfers to the general checking account. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that collateral in the amount of $1,200,000 deposited for safekeeping at the Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis and the,Federal Reserve Bank, is hereby approved. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day,of January, 1979 Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING FARMERS & MECHANICS SAVINGS BANK AS DEPOSITORY FOR THE INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS IN 1979 AND APPROVING COLLATERAL , WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.66 and 118.17, municipal funds may deposited in any savings and loan association which has its deposits insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, and WHEREAS, the amount of said deposits may not exceed FSLIC insurance covering such deposits, which insurance presently amounts to $100,000, unless amounts in excess of such insurance coverage is covered by additional collateral pledged to the City, and WHEREAS, the deposit of City funds in savings and loan associations and banks would provide greater flexibility in the City's investment program and maximize interest income thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows 1. That Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank, Marquette at 6th Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota, be designated as an official depository for City funds for 1979. 2. That collateral in the amount of $262,654, deposited for safe keeping with First National Bank of Minneapolis, is hereby approved. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of January, 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk f RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN AS DEPOSITORY FOR THE INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS IN 1979 AND APPROVING COLLATERAL WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.66 and 118.17, municipal funds may be deposited in any savings and loan association which has its deposits insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, and WHEREAS, the amount of said deposits may not exceed FSLIC insurance covering such deposits, which insurance presently amounts to $100,000, unless amounts in excess of such insurance coverage is covered by additional collateral pledged to the City, and WHEREAS, the deposit of City funds in savings and /loan associations and banks would provide greater flexibility in the City's investment program and maximize interest income thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the Midwest Federal Savings and Loan Association, 3100 West 66th Street, Richfield, Minnesota, be designated` as an official depository for City funds for 1979. 2. That collateral in the amount of $388,623.91, deposited for save keeping with the Richfield Bank and Trust Company of Richfield, Minnesota, is hereby approved. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 8th day of January, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: that s 1, "d of .Pe no ac Ze City „Council <Traffic 'C .. `devices are attached., ie ?comm`Xttee makes., the fallowing 'recommendations for ti clev.1 . ,si: y gns and Lights L th Street' and ,Upton Avenue . ? The. committee recommends in= ion of;. °a ,two -way stop. sign at this: intersectcin, stogpinz We nue 'traf f is ath Street' and Harriet Avenue: The committee r .commends stop.s.igns be;,installed at this intersection ith Street and Emerson Avenue : The: committee `r commends dd= tiQnal stop s;gns:::be. installed 'at this tersection; nth Street .and Lynnwood Blvd , : The committee r Commends j ddc;is:Wn: regarding traffic control devices o ' 6;6th Stre( zwood :BZ:vd be made untll .,development on the .W od Lake ,SpI f urther .along; and _;`.plans', for possible 66th S eet improv( �e finalized:' Oth .S.treet East of Penn Avenue.: The commute recommend: he existing , "No! Parking `Anytime restrict,ins> n the sout7 f 70th Street .'be .moved o the north side, .for ne block e 600 Block of ;.Grand: Avenue,: The committee reco ends that; ion be•''taken to establish• parking restric.t�ions in -'.this bl( completion, of the Off street parking• fac l�lty or: the ;rtted ft t 66':00 and Avenue TRAFFIC CONTROL COMMITTEE MINUTES December 18, 1978 PRESENT: C. Marinics, T. Morgan, R. Richardson, J. Wilde (M. Raaen arrived later) The Richfield Traffic Control Committee met on Monday, December 18, 1978 to review the following requests for traffic control devices and regulations: STOP SIGNS 74th Street & Upton Avenue: J. Wilde distributed copies of a petition that had been received from neighbors in the vicinity of 74th Street and Upton Avenue, requesting installation of a four -way stop at this intersection. She stated that the petitioners' request was based on concern with the number of accidents that had occurred at this intersection in recent years, and the fact that the 'inter - section is a school bus stop. R. Richardson stated that, although no accidents had occurred between 1973 and 1977, three accidents had occurred at this intersection ;Y during 1978. C. Marinics noted that Upton Avenue is stopped at 73rd Street, and that the pattern of traffic controls in this part of the city is to stop the North -South streets, at intersections • where two -way stops exist. The committee voted to recommend installation of a two -way stop sign at 74th Street and Upton Avenue, stopping Upton Avenue traffic. 69th Street & Harriet Avenue: J. Wilde distributed copies of a petition received from area residents, requesting installation of a stop sign to stop 69th Street traffic at Harriet Avenue. Committee members observed that the intersection is visually open, with no obstructions. R. Richardson reported that police files indicate no accidents at this intersection between 1973 and 1977. C. Marirics std--edthat perhaps high school students sometimes use this intersection as a short cut, but T. Morgan pointed out that students parking in the high school l.ot are required to exit to the south, onto 72nd Street. The committee voted to recommend that no stop signs be placed at the intersection of 69th Street and Harriet Avenue. 76th Street & Emerson Avenue: J. Wilde reported that petitions had been received from parishioners of Berea Lutheran Church, requesting installation of stop signs on 76th Street and Emerson Avenue. She observed that Emerson Avenue is presently stopped at this intersection. The committee agreed that the disparity between traffic volumes on 76th Street and Emerson warranted the existing two -way stop sign, but not a four -way stop, especially since the intersection is visually open. R. Richardson reported that some people were concerned with safety at this intersection as a result of a recent accident where ■ a child was struck by a v, incident did not.indicate conclusively prevented th The committee voted to re, be placed at 76th Street 66th Street & Lynnwood Bl, mittee review and respond Blvd. residents, requestii on 66th Street at Lynnwooc to the Planning Departmen- requested another status C. Marinics reminded the c under discussion for sign. 66th Street in addition condominium units on the I that any decision related be premature pending fina: any improvements to 66th Remaining committee member delay any a tion on this area are co mpleted, or at ments are developed. OTHER 70th Street East of Penn residents have expressed < east of Penns Avenue. hicle, but that circumstances of the that additional stop signs would have accident. ommend that no additional stop signs nd Emerson Avenue. d.: J. Wilde requested that the -com- to a petition submitted by Lynnwood g installation of a traffic signal light Blvd. This petition had been submitted t' d th tt' h y some ime ago, an e pe -; loners ave eport on their request. ommittee that plans are tentatively 'ficant improvements to this portion of :o the scheduled construction of additional oodlake School site. T. Morgan stated to traffic controls in this area would ization of the housing construction and treet. s concurred, and the committee voted to equest until further improvements in the least until final plans for such improve- Avenue: J. Wilde reported that several oncern with parked cars on 70th Street M. Raaen no ed that "no parking" restrictions do exist on the south side of this block. R. Richardson suggested that such restriction might be mor valuable on the north side of the block, to reduce possible congestion as westbound vehicles on 70th Street approach the stop sign at Penn Avenue. The committ e voted to re ommend that the existing "no parking" restriction on 70th Stree east of Penn Avenue be moved from the south side f the street o the north side. 6.600 Block Of Grand Avenu J. Wilde reported that the city council had requested the committee to review the advisability of establishing parking r striction on the 6600 block of Grand Avenue, in response to a equest from some of the residents on that block T. Morgan c mmented that the residents' request for parking restriction was made after the medical clinic opened, and that the current pattern of on street parking resulting from the medical clinic was aot conclusive since the clinic's off - street parking facility wa3 still clutte ed with construction materials, etc. The committee voted to take no action to establish on- street parking restrictions for the 6600 block of Grand Avenue at this time. 6600 Block of First Avenue: J. Wilde circulated a petition which was received from residents of this block, requesting removal of the "no parking" restrictions on the west side of this block. M. Raaen informed the committee that the signs were placed on this block after the street construction project was completed, in accordance with state aid requirements that parking on a 36 7foot wide street be limited to one side. He observed that elimination of these parking restrictions would disqualify First Avenue from state aid designation. The committee voted to make no change in the parking restrictions on the 6600 block of First Avenue. 72nd Street, vicinity of Grand & Harriet Avenues: J. Wilde summarized petitions which had been received requesting several changes in parking restrictions in the vicinity of 72nd Street and Grand and Harriet Avenues. T. J.11organ reminded committee members of the process that had been followed with neighbors in the whole high school area to standardize parking regulations. R. Richardson reiterated Morgan's point that parking congestion, and enforcement of parking require- ments, had been greatly eased since adoption of the standardized regulations. The committee voted to make no change in the parking restrictions in the vicinity of 72nd Street and Grand and Harriet Avenues. 78th Street, East of Penn Avenue: J. Wilde reported that a police officer had asked the committee to review the advisability of restricting parking on the 78th Street curve (adjacent to Walser Buick), after a car slid into a parked car. I T. Morgan asked if plowing this area was a problem, and C. Marinics stated that most plowing is done during periods when cars would not be parked here anyway. The committee voted to take no action establishing parking restrictions in this area. E. Pleasant Avenue, 73rd Street -76th Street: J. Wilde reported that another petition had been received from neighbors in this area, requesting that this portion of E. Pleasant Avenue be made two -way again. She reminded committee members that previous action on such a request had stipulated that absolute parking prohibitions would be necessary, if two -way traffic were to be permitted, and that the petitioners had indicated that such parking prohibitions would not be acceptable. T. Morgan stated that ingress and egress of public safety vehicles into the area was virtually impossible with any on- street parking if two -way traffic were to be permitted, since fire trucks would have a difficult time entering the area even with the existing one -way traffic pattern, iE very many cars are parked on the street. The committee voted to rec mmend no changes in the existing one- way traffic pattern on E. leasant Avenue between 73rd and 76th Streets. The committe discussed several other general matters, but made no additiona recommendations. Respectfully submitted, yce L. Wil e Chairman 1 ' 1 -- - - -_ -- ' 19�8 Manqpr y � pu. �..n �. i��`�" ,.�ti�� ' , ,fit �-• 4 -Ake- V KLf . �f -vim 21 -2 PETITION FOR LOCAL !MPROVEMENT City of Richfield, MIN Petition No. Date Received To: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. We, the undersigned, owners of not less than 51 in frortage of the real ;property abutting on =-- - -- - _— -- -- - - - - -- - - between and -------- — hereby petition that such: street be improved by — (dLA -_ t C r4 �' — 7 y +�.�_ �1i_Q�— rya__— - Signatures of Owners House No. legal Description of the Property 0-4 IAWX J 73 X15 U1.077 : Q) s 73 - -- .3i q - �1 aJ: S� - J Y, %� C� ' �C� %✓ l r 1. -_ 173 3 �Z'/)eL "-,i” - -- - — _5,__ 7a, 'Z� i 19 Examined, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned fora per cent �.�� • „�� G i y e r / ti ems, Jr j c "A t � i n Y WE THE [UNDERSIGNED NMEPS OF BEREA LUTHERAN CHUM, RICHFIELD, MINNESOTF,, '2EQU 'ST THAT THE CITY OF RICHFIELD INSTALL FDUR w,Y STOP SINS ON 76TH AND ETEIWN AVENUE SOUTH BECAUSE OF THE TP,AFFIC F 7 IT'D It'NIINENT DANCER TO OUR YOUNG CHILD cFEN e MME ADDRESS Lpa+h -, o j.S r-2 C= 3 STOP -LIGHT P This Pe and to t on or n posed Ci the area � -7 7 TITION — 66th STREET and LYNNWOOD BLVD, RICHFIELD, ition is presented to the Richfield Citv Council he Hennepin County Board by the Res;dents living ar Lynnwood Blvd., and in the interest of the pro- n dominium and Townhouse Residents w10 will live in now occupied by Woodlake School. MN. Item One: East of 35W there is no means of safely crossing busy 66th _street -- either by car or particularly as a pedestrian seeking east or 'west public bus transportation, school children loading on their buses, and the elderly except for the present manually operated stop -light for the Woodlak School cross ng. Item Two: Wit: 'Hennepin County :remove this mane at this crossing particularly th, ?noted. the removal (responsible ally operated for both eas se pedestrian :Item Three: Theee is a real n Lynnwood Blvd., intersection t either east or west, in fact .almost a blind entrance to si both vehicular and pedestrian i cy vi the J 4 ake condor�ini Item Four: Car onto Lynnwood B. Drivers proceed. cannot see if p, to turn in and at 35 mi. per h: light now serve the light might manually operat, traffic signal turning traffic lisions in this proceeding w, vd. create ha ing east on 66- destrians: or 4 earn to appro; . press or la: as a caution be operated. d light prior ould make pedi and out down area. Item Fiver The present manua west of Lynnwoo Boulevard an south side of 6 th street. W light extension to the middl would be equally visible if r done now and not tied in with street from 35W to Lyndale Av Program. This program, we ar on 66th street s to be finan nent stop -light should be ins f Woodlake School we are informed that or 66th Street improvements) will also stop -light thus creating a major Hazard and west bound motorists and pedestrians, waiting for public transportation as ed for a stop -light preferably at the facilitate entering 66th street going andatory based on our experiences, with • hting east bound traffic. This traffic, will soon be greatly increased as build - m development proyrcusEs. st on 66th street and attempting to turn ardous conditions for cars following. h street, turning onto Lynnwood Blvd. yclists are in the cross walk until ready ch the turn cautiously but cars following e switch. The manually operated atop at this point as drivers watch to see if Relocation of this present Woodlake School to installation of a permanent phased -in strians and vehicles more conscious of he number of rear end; and side sw:Lpe col- ly operated stop -light is now about 60 ft. is.operated from either the north or th the present well c!esigned overhead of 66th street, it is easily seen and Located at Lynnwood Blvd. This should be the decisions concerning widening 66th as part of the Lyn&ale- Hub- Nicollet Ave. told, is about two years away be['-ore work sd and undertaken, at which time a perm3- 311ed. Stop -Light Petition Item Six: The residents interested in this Petition are very strongly recommending three considerations to the Richfield City Council: =1) Temporary action to move the present manually operated stop -light from its present location at the Woodlake School crossing to Lynnwood Boulevard intersection. 2) Installation of a permanent stop- •light as a pare of the Lyn&ale- Hub- Nicollet Avenue Program with the widening of 66th street. 3) The fact that items 1) and 2) have also been favorably considered by members of the Ring Committee and the McBride Business Men's HLN Group. Note 1: All Residents of Lynnwood Blvd. are listed on page 3, with signatures and dates. Note 2: A copy of the April 19, 1977, "Summary of the Ring Committee • Meeting is attached. Please note underlined sentences page 1 and 2. Note 3: 11 copy of the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority letter of May 11, 1977, is attached as an informative item concerning progress in the K -Mart development at 66th street and Lyndale Ave. S. • Richard C. Krier, Planning and Development Director, City of Richfield, has indicated his willingness to discuss or answer any inquiries con- cerning this petition for a stop -light at the 66th street and Lynnwood Boulevard intersection. page 2 of 3 Stop -Light P Lynnwood Boulevard 6604 6608 6612 6616 6620 6624 6628 6632 '::6636 6605 6607 6611 6615. 6617 ;.6621 6625 6629 6633 6657 6721 6725 6735 tion ALL RESID .Tom W. Wanou M A. Morten on Dani_al Walla e Robert L. Gr n Gary L. Butl r Robert E. Heater Einar: E. Car son Jennifer CA,-ham Ruby Lundeen (Mrs. Eric) Carl R.-Eric Mrs. Hans J. Wessel (Ruth) David L. Mat on ,Gilbert G. N vies Herbert L. Gardner Richard W. S xe Robert H. Sc ul;iacher Eldon: C. MiI er Charles W. C rr Frank E. Tor ance Paul W. FIans n Donald M. McCormick Dale J. Nelson p SIGN TURE -' v cl Al page 3 of 3 0 Signature of Ow?;,er e tz s 2. yy jr, PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVE 1E NT City of Richfield, Minnesota .- 4. Yetition No. L11 Dated Rece4ve TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. We, the undersigned, owners of the real property abuLt1-'0* b 6600 Block on First kv(orun South hereby petition that such street be J=rove�- by /v7 Rpmnv-ql of It `Tm Rwrkjma at nng TT ice, -girige L L2. 0 Signature of Ow?;,er e tz s 2. yy jr, e&j .- 4. L11 6. b f7 LO. j Ao /v7 v L2. L3. L4. L5. L6. L7. Examined, checked, and found to be -i, urcrer form aiid to be si*,= --` he lrel,1111i,-2a of owners of property afft., -men* -t for. .c,�ed ty the ma; -i. of �--,c L per Cent City Clerk y. October 30, 1978 Richfield City ouncil 6700 Portland A e. So. Richfield, Mn. 5 1423 ` 0 LC Rich rite id City Manager Gentlemen: Our neighborhood, in the vicinity of Central Elementary School, has become so littered with lunch bags, soft drink cans, etc. This is a result of the 8 :00 AM to 10:30 Am parking restriction. It doesn't work. The High School kids go to McDonald's about 11:30 kM and then return to a street which is close to the school. They sit in their cars to eat their lunches. They leave the bags and cups outside their cars. We have talked to the High School officials, but without results. We have obtained two petitions from residents on 72nd street and an Grand Ave. The four residents on 72nd street -equest that the north side of 72nd street between Harriet a d Pleasant Aves. be posted with parking signs which read NO PARKING ON SCH OL DAYS BETWEEN :00 AM and 4 :30 PM. I have talked to Bruce Anderson, Supt. of Schools and he has agreed to this petition. He says that they have provided of street parking for the organizations • using the facilities of Central Se ool. The second petition restricts ,- parking on Grand Ave. between 721d and 73rd streets, The petition reads }R -NO PARKING BETWEE 10:00 AM and 2:)0 PM ON SCiOOL DAYS If you only have signs which read 40 PARKING BETWEE 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM ON SCHOOL DAYS,this would be satisfactory. We must ke p the students from parking over the lurch period._; We than< you for your cooperation in.this matter. Respectfully yours Alton Pd./ Tekse 7200 Grand Ave. So. Richfield, Mn. 55423 869- 9637 • a October 10, 1978 TO: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, RICHFIELD MINNESOTA We the undersigned residents of the City of Richfield, Minnesota request to have the street signs which restrict parking on the north side of 72 nd at. between Harriet Ave. and Pleasant Ave. changed to read "NO PERKING Between 8:00 A.M. and 4 :30 P.M. On School Days ". -1 40D �, �- .,..._., ICS . �iV'�°�. � �, c: j C`.n,c�_.,,�._ �.�...�., �, ,• 3 � '• / �� ,�� Z� -.: �✓�'- 0�� /- UGC- �'- �„ -LG�C i�.� . �L. � r -Y N- TO: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, We, the undersigned residents of have the street igns which restr: between 72nd Street and 73d Street and 2:00 P.M. ON SCHOOL DAYS ". F October 11, 1978 RICHFIELD MINNESOTA he City of Richfield, Minnesota, request to ct parking on the :rest side o£ Grand Avenue changed to read "NO PARKING BETWEEN 10i0OA44M. (mil 7-2c October 11, 1978 TO: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, RECHFIELD MINNESOTA } We, the undersigned residents of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, request to have the street signs which restrict parking on the east side ; of Grand Avenue between 72nd Street and 73d Street changed to read_'INOrPARKING BETWEEN 10:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. ON SCHOOL DAYS ". d U ��J'Vk- 07 JI a 411A. . ��' `i� <? . 4 �A .� � C— `l" h.(� r � cis ! r`cL r. Cl.� L' JC? . n � L - t t�7 �� ?f / • � . Y ✓ � /fiL9 • `! /^LCD � ' �C.J ��' '� /, � �i'�C -Fz.- � �/ /�! r Tac.ES� r • r i r PETITIO1 FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT HEWED City of NOV 3 1978 Richfield, Minnesota Pict ie Cad N�nager e iti n o. Dated Received TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. We, the undersigned, owners of the real property abutting 6 5 f� ee-1 5 cr t! hereby petition that such st eet be improved by �-f_ fit_ //"jlj 9 fi(/� ' �' �' G i ( he / 1 Signature f Owner Address l• �/ 1 e_ WlY, ,d : ,3 " .f V. �Oj-j'� 22k -1) ex Nc -r -5 Cb k( %( j_IJ _. Al 8. E- L-A '11,17,dw-xAl I�Alll '�(-3H-7 LO. LZ IV L3• , L5, r , Jr M, y ► A V L6. ' ell L7 (71-r dl"Llz 4!f -7L-� Amok ExamiL checked, and found to be Ln proper form and to be signed by the required nwc,ber of owners of prope ty affected by e making of the improvement petitioned for. P r cent City Clerk .... i - f CITY ''OE RICHFIELD;: MINNESOTA Office of 'City Manager council Letter- No . 3 y, _ Agenda January 8, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and ' Members of the City Council City of Richfield- Council Members: - Subject: Appointment to Hennepin County Planning Area Citizen Advisory Committee ('PACAC) Richfield participates in the Community Development Block Grant proWam as part of Hennepin County's '.Urban County" applica- tion. I Hennepin County has established five, planning! areas within the county to meet the citizen participation requirements of... the Community Development Block Grant program. Communities in our planning area include Eden: Prairie, Edina, Minnetonkai, St. Louis Park and Richfield. The communities in each planning area are to appoint a Plann ing Area Citizen Advisory ,Committee (PACAC). These committees will r. have the following responsibilities: 1 . Participation in develo ment 'of the Urban C� P P unt 's, Y Comprehensive;Strategy for meeting the federal block,.grant program objectives; 2.., Holding a public hearing for review and cornment on the proposed one -year and three -year Housing Assist -' ance Plan and Community Development ;projects for communities within their planning area; .3. Serving as a; forum for additional public meetings; - 4. Reviewing and commenting to the'Hennepin,Co my Board of: Commissioners . on`.program amendments for activities - within the planning area" 5. Reviewing and commenting to the County Board on the proposed use of funds to replace local option or contingency activities within the planning area; 6. Reviewing and commenting to the County.Board on Urban County housing and community development p rformance; '..- 7. Reviewing the Citizen Participation.Plan annually, ' and.soliciting, comments on the plan from the general > public. f i CITY OF RICHFIELD,MINNESOTA Office, of City Manager. Council Letter No. 2` Agenda January, 8, 1979- The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Designation of Official Newspaper Attached hereto is a copy of a letter from Sun Newspapers, Inc. requesting that the 'Richfield Sun be designated as the city!s official newspaper for ?979. -. The legal rates are set.;. forth as described' in., the ,attached ,letter and are:the same rates as paid by the city in 1978. Also attached is a, letter from the Sun Newspapers staging that the recent change in ownership of the newspaper 'does not affect their request for designation as the official Richfield newspaper. It is recommended that the city council renew its designa- tion of the Richfield Sun as the city's official ewspaper. :Respectfully submitted, td ` •Wayne S. Burggraaf'f City Manager WSB/ e j a cc: City Clerk City Attorney, F �I r SUN NEWSPAPERS December 15, 1978 1'� j 6601 WEST SEVENTY - EIGHTH STREET EDINA, MIN N. 55435 • 941 -4800 City Council City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Gentlemen: Your designation of the Richfield Sun to be your official newspaper for the year 1979 will be most appreciated. The rate for legal publications as set by Minnesota law is 20.5 per line for the first insertion, 13.6 per line for each subsequent insertion. Tabular matter, i.e., proper names, numbers, legal descriptions, etc., is 6.9(" per line additional for the original insertion with no additional charge for repeats of the original insertion. We will provide, at no additional charge, two notarized affidavits on each of 0 your publications. Additional notarized affidavits, on request, will be furnished at 25(, each. All publications should reach this office by 3 p.m., Monday preceding your Wednesday publication. In order to expedite our services to you, it is requested that you direct your publications to the attention of Meridel Hedblom, Legal Department, 6601 W. 78th Street, Edina, MN 55435. Thank you for your consideration of this, our official application for designation of the Richfield Sun as your official newspaper for the ensuing year. Very truly yours, SUN NEWSPAPERS, INC. James R. Ritchay' E EDO xecutive Vice President ,j U C '30 1979 JRR:bk Richfidd 0 Manager SUS' NEWSPAPERS 1 _ 6601 WEST SEVENTY - EIGHTH STREET ,� EDINA, MINN. 55435 941 -4800 .28 December 1978 -As you may already -know, Sun Newspapers are now published by M nnesota Soburban Newspapers, Inc., Elmer L. Andersen, publisher. This change occurred Friday, Dec. 22. It ire no wad affects our kid for legal publication. made earlier this month. if there are any questions please call me, 041 -4800. Sinc ere 11, Ken Wisn.eski Executive Editor CITY OF RICHFIELD,`. MINNESOTA Office of� City, Manager. Council Letter.;No. 1 Agenda 'January 8, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council; `City` of . Rich f ield� Council Members: Subject:. Amendment to HCCJC Bylaws On January 10, 1977, the city council adopted a resolution establishing he Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council ,`authorizing Richfield's participation on this council and approving the operational bylaws of the council.:. Twenty -eight "other Hennepin County jurisdictions also joined the, HCCJC. The bylaws approved by these jurisdictions provided that the four. mayor- council member.; representatives :serve;. ,On the HCCJC, to I.,;; be elected through ballot by the mayors and council members of.: the participating suburban local units of government. Since this selection process hasfproven to be quite cumbersome, the HCCJC has proposed an amendment'to the:bylaws, which 'would provide selection of the four mayor- council representatives key those mem- hers of the. Assoc- iation.of Metropolitan Municipalities represent'- ing suburban cities. A copy of, the proposed amendment is attached. It is.recomm- ended that the city council pass a resolution.approving this amend - ment to the bylaws of the ;Hennepin County Criminal Justice. Coordin- ating Council. Respectfully submitted, Wayne S.. Bur gg raaff City ,Manager WSB %eja cc: Public Safety Director i. �I PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL OPERATIONAL BYLAWS Article IV. MEMBERSHIP Section 3. Any suburban - local unit of government desiring to become a member of the HCCJCC shall execute a joint resol ;ution of participation and those same units of government which execute such resolutions shall jointly have the following representation on the HCCJCC: -- feaw- ledl� }daals; -e} thee- r�aya�s- e�- r�embe�s- ef- sabew�ae -eltq� eeeeells;- eleeted;- threugh- failed- eefflleatlems -and- ballets; b,�- tbe- �a,�e�s- aed- eeapel l- r�erabe�s- ef- pawi:lei•patleg- sebawbae leeal- ee }ts- ef- geYePnfeet; -- four individuals, either mayors or members of suburban city_. councils, to be selected by those members of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities who represent suburban units of government within Hennepin County; -- two suburban city managers /administrators... The motion for adoption of the proposed amendment was madeby'Hopkins Chief Ovide LaBerge, seconded bu District Court representative 'Ward IihaZen and passed unanimousZy on October 4, 1978, at a regular meeting of the HCCJCC. _y I r RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO HCCJC BYLAWS WHEREAS, The City of Richfield recognizes the need for criminal justice planning and coordination on a county -wide basis, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield therefore participated in the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, and WHEREAS, the HCCJC has proposed an amendment to the council's bylaws which would provide that four mayor - council member repre- sentatives to the HCCJC be selected by those members of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities who represent suburban units of government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richfield does approve this amendment to the operational bylaws of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 8th day of January, 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk Loren L. Law Mayor