Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02-26-79 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office ,of City Manager "58 Council Letter No. Agenda February 2 6,` 1979 F I& 2 a The Honorable Mayor`' and ; Members of the City Councils -'" City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Sign Permit Application, Richfield Bank 'and. Trust- Subdivision 1.9, Section.3.49 of the Richfield Ordinance Code requires that <the city-council must approve issuance of permits for'signs which are illuminated, moving, or of unusual` height, size, design, or location. A sign application has recently been received from the Richfield Bank and Trust Company. which appears to meet this criteria, and there is an item on the February 26;, 1.979 city council agenda providing for council review of this application. Richfield Bank and Trust has requested permission to in- stall "a pedestal sign at the northwest corner of their property located at 6625 Lyndale Avenue. This sign, measuring six and .one -half feet in width and fifteen and three - tenths -feet in length, would face traffic at the southeast corner of the Lyndale Avenue -West 66th Street intersection. It would replace the existing sign on the west side of the.bank offices which fronton Lyndale Avenue. The proposed sign is to be intermittently illuminated with messages, time, weather, and other information. TAe sign would be multi -faced with an illuminated message center directed towards Lyndale Avenue and West 66th Street (see atached location map) . The signboard itself will be plastic, the 'ped- estal steel, and-the base covered with brick facia and land- scaping. The public works director and planning.and redevelopment • director have reviewed this sign application. It is their recommendation, in which I concur, that the city council deny this sign permit for the following reasons: 1. Section 3.48, Traffic Regulation and Sign Location, provides that: Council Letter No. 58 -2- February 26, 1979 3.48. TRAFFIC REGULATI ©N AND SIGN LOCATION. Compliance with the following regulations relative to traffic con- e trol is required: (1) No moving or flashing sign shall be located or, maintained within 50 feet of an intersection at which traffic semaphores-are located. (2) No sign shall °be designed, located, or maintained so as to be likely to 'obscure or conceal.or cause confusion as to any traffic control sign or device. (3) No sign shall be located or maintained on or over any public street.'or' highway right -of -way unless specifically permitted by the. zoning regulations of the city. (4) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers,;flashing ;signs or similar devices that would distract automobile . traffic as to constitute 'a safety hazard. The illumination of any sign located near a residential district shall be diffused or, indirect and located "so as not to direct light on residences. No flashing sign shall be, located in such close proximity to,resdences or residential property as to constitute a nuisance to persons residing on such property by reason of the flashing of the lights in such sign. (5) No sign shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the ability of drivers or pedestrians to • see any crossroad or crosswalk. It is the opinion of the staff that the proposed sign will violate these ordinance provisions in the following ways: a. Be located "as to be likely to obscure or1conceal or cause confusion" to the Lyndale Avenue -West 66th Street traffic signals; 11f b. Distract automobile operators passing through this intersection in such a way as to "constitute a safety hazard "; C. Interfere with the ability of pedestrians and motorists to see the' - Lyndale Avenue and West 66th Street pedes- trian crosswalks and signals. iI 2. The subject intersection is situated.in a high inten- sity land use area containing exceptionally high traffic counts, Adding another.commercia ized attraction such as this illuminated messy e sign will only add to the feeling of anxiety when ore drives or walks through the intersection. This would con - flict with the passive, soft green, environmental goals of the L /H /N redevelopment project as expressed in the planned pedestrian plaza to be located directly across the intersection. fefNS wf oOtl@ a < �fe es f.e eUao- ee , . -• r� I 0e 0e : f !eOOffsfe . oe #* 0 le'- 00 M . - *0000, -N - ff +0 f ee *0f 00 •.eefe .'Nf: - ffff' sY0 e f9f ei ; `fO09 • e0 6e` 40 ; oew 8 e0 ee69 tl O r . 0' f. ff. feoe, f o fosse• eeeef- ee�: of fe f.; sfffee: iu Aff 66th uj i Q Proposed Display Location BLDG. PLOT PLAN — NO SCALE ST. CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council. Letter No. 57 Agenda February 26, 197'9 D The Honorable Mayor, and Members of the City Council' City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Acceptance of Sidewalk Easement and Authorization of Access Agreement As part of the developer's agreement between the HRA and Financial Properties Developers, Inc., the developer is to dedicate a ten -foot wide lease life sidewalk easement.to the the developer will City of "Richfield. ; Within this .easement, from the construct 'a 10 -foot wide public sidewalk running Avenue to the west line of west right -of -way line; of "Lyndale the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company property: This ease -_ ment (which is also part of, the K -Mart rezoning) will expire , Inc. terminates. The when the developers lease with K -Mart, to K -Mart lease is a 25 year "lease with two renewal options, create a 75 year lease: f The midblock sidewalk is one of the principle the Lyndale pedestrian /Hub /Nicollet - circulation concepts adopted as part of Redevelopment Plan. This ,midblock sidewalk provides an import - ant to west link in the L /H /N business area. Other east /west; east provided along both 65th Street.and pedestrian links are pr g for 66th Street. The Hub /Penny /Summit.'PUD plan provides extension of this midblock pedestrian easement from Ncolle Avenue to the east right -of -way of the Chicago Northeastern railway tracks. The developer's agreement also provides that K -Mart have access to Lyndale Avenue. This access agreement fr s necessary m Lyndale to insure the property owners perpetual access Avenue'. The proposed agreement is drawn to allow one access' location of point across Lot 3 to Lyndal.e.Avenue. The actual the is delineated in the P -C2 zoning district access point final development "Plan. Lot 3 is a strip of land which has been separated from the K -Mart site so that the city can complete Lyndale Avenue street and pedestrian imp the city ovements. for this The HRA "will be asked to dedicate Lot 3 t public "purpose. • ACCESS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 1979, by and between the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter "City and Financial Properties Developers, Inc., a Georgia corporation, hereinafter "Financial ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City is the owner of that tract of land being and lying within the City of Richfield, Iiennepin County, Minnesota legally described as follows: "Lot 3, Block 1, Heyman Addition according to the plat thereon on file and on record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Ainnesota." and WHEREAS, Financial- is the owner of that tract of land being - and lying within the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota legally described as follows: "Lot 1, Block 1, Heyman Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and on record in the Office of the Regis - trar of Titles in and for Iiennepin County, Minnesota." and WHEREAS, the parties hereto are desirous that access to •Lyndale Avenue South be provided to Financial over and across the property owned by the City, which will allow for future realignment of such access; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants here- inafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:' 1. The City hereby grants to Financial the right of access Z rom and to Lyndale Avenue South to and from tot 1, Block 1, Heyman Addition for vehicular and pedestrian traffic purposes over and across Lot 3, Block'l, Heyman Addition. 2. Such access shall be over and across one 45.00 foot wide corridor located not less than 10.00 .feet north of the northwesterly most corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Heyman Addition and not less than 50 _feet southerly from the northwesterly most corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Heyman Addition. Such access shall be subject to the right of the City to install, reinstall and *Maintain any utility installations over or under the surface occupied by such access corridor. i� Its FIIIANCIAL PROPERTIES DEVELOPERS, INC. BSI TTEST. By I is °rr -2- 3. Such access will be initially located as described on C -1 site plan which is part of the overall development plan submittal for the development of said Lot 1. The cost of constructing such access shall be solely borne by Financial. 4. Should Financial determine at some .future date to relocate its actual access from the location described in the final development plan submittal and in the event of any subsequent relocations thereafter, it shall fully reimburse the Citv of the cost of relocating or recon- structing all improvements then existing on that part of Lot 3 over and across which the access is relocated. 5. Should Financial determine at some future date to relocate its actual access from the location described in the final development plan submittal, and in the event of any subsequent relocations thereafter, it shall pay the entire cost of terminating the existing access point, including the cost of reconstrucing that area in a manner which is architecturally harmonious with "adjacent uses of said Lot 3. Such termination must occur either prior to or simultaneous with the opening of the new access point. 6. This agreement shall be binding upon and run with the • land to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. IN TESTIM014Y WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this document to be executed in their behalves and under their authority__ and on the day and year first above written. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA By Its i� Its FIIIANCIAL PROPERTIES DEVELOPERS, INC. BSI TTEST. By I is °rr -2- February 22, 1979 Ms. Joyce Wilde Executive Director Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield, MN 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Re: Pedestrian Walkway Easement Dear Ms. Wilde The Developer's Agreement between Financial Properties Developers, Inc., and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield, Minnesota calls for the construction of a pedestrian walkway over and across the site as such walkway is generally located in the "Map of Pedestrian Easement" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" When such construction is completed, Financial Properties shall execute and deliver to the Housing and Redevelopment an easement in substantially the form of the attached Exhibit "B". It is understood that the actual walkway location will be as described in the "as built" drawings prepared subsequent to construction. The execution and delivery of the easement described above is a condition precedent to the obligation of the Housingand Redevelop - ment Authority to issue its Certificate of Completion covering this project. I Yames ctfully yours, T. Murphy President JTM /lsh Financial Properties Developers, Inc Enclosures LA b E:'IL't`J 1 s 1979, between Financial Properties Developers, Inc., a Georgia Corporation part of the first part, and THE CITY OF Richfield, Minnesota municipal corporation, party of the second part, WITNESSETTI: That the' pa rty of the first }part' in consideration of the sum of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION to it in hand paid by said party of the second part,_ the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant and convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns; the following described easement lying over, under, across and through the following described parcel of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to -wit: Description of Parcel: Lot 1, Block 1, HEYMAN ADDITION Description of Easement: A 10.00 foot wide easement for public pedestrian pur- poses over, under, across and through the above described parcel, measured at right angles with the southerly line of said easement which line is described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 1;-thence South 00. degrees, 06 minutes, 11 seconds East, assumed basis for bearings, 279.99 feet along the easterly line of said Lot 1, to the point of beginning of said southerly line; thence South 89 degrees, 44 minutes, 39 seconds West 135.02 feet; thence South 44'degrees, 53 minutes, 49 seconds West, 42.49 feet; thence South 89 degrees, 53 minutes, 49 seconds West, 334.12 feet, to the westerly line of said Lot 1, and there terminating. L Date ZZ S "/ .z APPLICATION. FOR CITY OF 'RICHFIELD i ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR - COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME 20 ✓ L - A ,z? f, / q Al cR 1979 Last First Richfie y (Maoag BIOME ADDRESS ZYA/ ,A A? L yc o Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. , City Zip Code 3 y �- Business PHONE: Home _�. - APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm..; Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: n D _ - _ 1 - p / ii ,._ / / �1'_.,.n li % L uif �iLr p / %T L✓ Grp Aa-, �rROFESSTCNAt-AN-B -C —GMA WTI -1-T-Y- AC- TIVIT - -IE -S 4' .� 1910 /0 I i OCCUPATION :. / 1 Employing -firm; agency Addre s s G L 3 Position LU- Years w /fimVagency Other work_ experience (optional) REFERENCES (Optional) A. ull name / Relationship r Mailing address Phone number B. GCS - 2vz-r/�1 cz � Full name i Relationship G Maili g address Phone number C. 11 name Relationship 4 ��4o Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 a Att: Eileen Anderson CITY OF RICHFIELDj,.MINNESOTA Y Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 55 Agenda February 26,_1979 u The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield d._-., i Council Members: a :Subject: Discussion of Appointment of CATV Advisory' Committee Council members requested, that an item be., scheduled on the February 26 1979 city council. agenda for` the purpose - of cussing the appointment of a :citizens advisory committee on cable television. This advisory committee.would be- charged with re-, viewing and - making a recommendation to the city council relating to Richfield's need for cable television'service. Appointment of a...ctizen advisory ,committee to conduct this needs assess cable t levision franchisin :. first step in the ca e merit is the f r p, g ' • procedure established by the state. A citizen's advisory committee on cable television was appointed by the Richfield City Council several yeas ago, al.- though this committee did not progress to the point,of making I a recommendation to the city council relating to, th provision of cable television services:: A list of .the, members, of this previous CATV' committee is attached. Also attached are applica- tions from citizens interested in being appointed to this committee. :Respectfully `submit ed, J y L. 'Wilde ct'ng City Manager JLW /eja' cc: City Attorney A* t F. Independent School District No. 280 70th & Harriet Avenue • Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Bruce R. Anderson Superintendent Telephone: (612) 861 -7511 January 31, 1979 Mr. Wayne Burggraaff City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Dear Wayne: Pursuant to our recent conversation, our school district would be most pleased to provide a resource to the committee which the Council is considering creating regarding the cable television concept. The possible positive consequences to the school district would be substantial and thus we would be pleased to have a member on the committee if the Council so desires. Mr. Jack Loss is a knowledgeable individual in this area and would be my designee until July 1, 1979 if a school district representative is seen as useful. Thank you. Sincerely, Bruce R. Anderson Superintendent BRA: jm COQ FEB 1 1979 �(li ;irli °ill 61 ` v Manager EA. E. SGNIOLSKI 6334 SES ID AN AVE -SOUTH RICHFiFLD, I'I!s 55423 9y (6,7o-o �/Z l a � EE3 2 1979 U lailiiciu --s NAME Date 2/9/7A APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RIC�I� ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSIO Pp U Lash i lilanaer First Middle -�- HOME ADDRESS 7115 Chicago Ave. So., Richfield MN 55423 Street No.. City ZIP Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) -- uu�CC 1V0. City Zip Code PHONE: Home 861- 6987 Business 927 -8681 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisor Human Rights Commission_ Senior Citizen & Handicapped Y Comm. Civil Service Commission Peed - -._. Advisory Commission Advisory Board of Health Other r • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which ou municipal commission /committee and why believe qualify you for this y you are interested in serving: Have develo — e d training and orientation programs to insure efficiency and profitability for my employer. Analyzed Word Processing system for entire organization with recommendation for retention of the present system. Organized and coordinated Richfield campaign for County Commissioner 1978 election. Assisted in campaign for IR Governor in 1978 election. Feel a deep sense o f vemen 1n, e co interest in serving the needs of the people. With my backgroundin an planning and organizing, o ice mgm an �b tt tatt will be beneficial�to this committee ane't e cQti'zensno ichfie1 CfVf8nt�K�F I�NAL AND COMMUNITYACTIVITiES: d. f R ublican Part Richfield Precinct 10 Alternate; Richfield Chairwoman for Randy Johnson, County Commissioner, in 1978 election; Candidate for IR Chairwoman Off Senate District 37. Member of: Minnea oils Institute of Arts, Administrative Management Society, AGOG (Business Women's Group) OCCUPATION :. Employing .firm, agency Stivers Tem nrary genry Address 6800 France Ave. So., Edina-MN 55410 Position Secreta ial Years w /firm/agency tempourg Other 'Work experience (optional) Sr Supervisor Hennepin County MinnPapolis MN 55487 Sr. Supervisor, E1lerbe Architects, One Appletree Square, Bloomington 55420 REFERENCES (Optional) A. Randall E. Johnson, Commissioner, Hennepin County Friend Full name Relationship 2406 G@vernmei4 GenteF Mi nneapnl i S MN 55487 '148 -MAR Mailing address Phone number Be Frank Gibbs Friend Full name Relationship 83Q7 Johnson AvP Sn , Rlnnmingtnn 55411 8 -11 -72A9 Mailing address Phone number C. Val Wi l eV Fri and Full name Relationship The Greenbrier 10521 So. Cedar Lake Road, Minnetonka 546 -7115 Mailing address Phone number Return to: City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 Att-. Eileen Anderson ti 0 1 - CITY OF RICHFIELD, - ,MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 54 Agenda February 26; 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield 3 Councii Members: Subject: Authorization to Call for Bids, Carbon Dioxide, Unit for Water Treatment Plant 1979/84 Capital Improvement.Program. includes a project, .The scheduled for 1979, to replace the carbon dioxide `system at the water treatment plant. The age of the existing equipment is making the aQquisition of parts and maintenance increasingly costly and ,difficult. Replacement of this unit is necessary to insure-our-continued capability to meet demands for water service. The 1979 Capital Budget provides that this equip- ment replacement will be financed entirely with `water ` user fees. It is recommended that the city council authorize the advertisement for bids for a carbon dioxide feeder unit and appurtenant work. Respectfully submitted, ace L. Wilde I Acting City Manage JLW/ e j a cc: Public Works Director Finance Director 1` CITY OE RI C H F I ELD MIN N E o2A Office of City .Manager Council Letter No. 53 Agenda 'February 26,.o:11 979 The Honorable Mayor, s�,p and Members of thel City, Council City of Richfield counc il Members Subject: Approval of Community Development and Housing Assistance 'Plans, and Authorization to Submit. Grunt Application Each year for the ',past ' five years, th e city council has adopted a Commtunity,Development Plan and a Housing Assistance Plan. These plans.have.repiesented ' a three -year proposal for expenditure of the city's Community Development Block Grant funds, and the federal, state and local housing assistance funds-which Richfield receives. Richfield's Community Devel- opment and Housing Assistance Plans are.combined with 'the plans of 41 other Hennepin County communities to comprise the Hennepin County Urban County Community DevelopmentlBlock Grant Application. f The Community Development funds have been used for a variety of public improvements since the city firs jt began re- - ce.iving them, including improvements to the commun ty center,' water treatment plant and numerous city parks. The Housing Assistance Plan has provided the basis for the HRA's housing programs.and has been successful with 212 existing housing units` leased, $934,630 in rehabilitation` -1 ans and to low and moderate homeowners, grants -made e construction of five new homes to replace substandard structures, and a program just being initiated to replace subst an dard homes with five to six new homes for large, low income families. In July, 1978,: the HRA referred the•Housing Assistance Plan.to the Ad Hoc Housing' Committee for study and review. This committee, ".which is a cross - section of Richfield r sidents, housing providers,,and,housing users, has met-frequently since that time to review the draft housing assistance plan., On November 27, 1978, the city.council held public hear= ing to inform Richfield citizens about the Communi y Development Block Program and., to receive comments from various citizens and organizations on community needs`. This hearing - specifically Council Letter: No. 53 -2- February 26, 1979 identified he following concerns: 1. A need for.. accessible housing for disabled and low income people, °including rental units, town -` houses., and condominiums ; 2. A, need for programs to alleviate storm sewer flooding problems;` 3. A need for development of Adams Hill Park. From this information, the city's adopted Capital Improve- ment Program, and input from the various city departments -, the staff prepared•a draft Community; Development Block Grant plan. and Housing Assistance Plan to cover the period of August'1, 19 719- to July 31, 1982. Proposed Community Development Plan Over the next three years, Richfield can receive approximately $990,000 for community development purposes, and $700,000 for i housing purposes. The HRA can also 'receive an...additional estimated" $180,000 from the Metropolitan Council for the Section $ Leased Housing Program, The Community Development Funds.must be used for purposes • - which directly benefit low and moderate income people, provide for handicapped Aped accessibili "ty, to and new facilities, create ''long; -term private employment for low and moderate income persons., or support planning activities'. The Community Development Plan describes the following pro - grams to be accomplished over the,next three years with the Community Development Block Grant funds: *Rehabilitation of low and moderate $250,000 income occupied housing, including handicapped and , flood - proofing. *Redevelopment of Adams Hill Park 250,000 *Comprehensive Planning 20,000 *Handicapped Accessibility to public 40,)00 buildings` *P ark improvements -New Fordtown Park 60,)00 *Economic development- (L /H /N area). 370,)00 $990, 00 Proposed Housing Assistance Plan. The Housing Assistance Plan provides a guide for delivery`. of low and moderate ncome,housing in Richfield. Accordingly, this plan must -meet the following: criteria: Council Letter No. 53 =3- February 26, 1979 1. It must address the needs of low and moderate income persons 2. Seventy- percent of the assistance provided must be to families, with thirty,percent of the assistance-'to the elderly; 3. It must conform with the area -wide housing allocation plan for the Metropolitan Council. After each three -year Housing Assistance Plan has been implemented, our achievements are reviewed by the Federal Depart- ment of 'Housing and Urban Development and the Metropolitan Council. ' n Council has the authority to review and comment The Metropolita Y I on our performance, and also may recommend any changes in funding are a ro riate The De artment -of HUD.has which they feel pp P P . authority. -to decline funding based on housing'.assistance program performance. The draft Housing Assistance Plan which has now, been pre' - pared, provides a one -year implementation plan for the period -II from August 1,'1979 through' August, 1980 as. well as a long -range three-year plan. The Housing Assistance Plan provides the follow- ing three -year objectives: Housing Units to Be Provided or •. Rehabilitated -- *New Home Program - New owner occupied 7 New rental (private developer) .5 *Richfield Housing.Fund Rehabilitation of owner. occupied 245 housing units „.- Rehabilitation of multi - family units 30 *Section 8 Leased Existing Housing 100 .Units PACAC. Recommendations The draft Community Development Plan was presented to the planning area citizens advisory committee (PACAC) for their review and recommendation on February 13, 1979._ his committee is a group of. citizens representing southwest Hen epin County, and is responsible for reviewing and commenting on community development plans. The establishment of this co ittee'and its review responsibilities are requirements of the Department of Urban Development. r RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN AND OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION MATERIALS AND AUTHORIZING THEIR SUBMITTAL TO HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has executed a Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County agreeing to participate in the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, a three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been prepared consistent with the Comprehensive Urban Hennepin County Community Development strategy and the Community Development Program Regulations, and WHEREAS, the three year Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan has been subject to citizen review pursuant to the Urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan, and WHEREAS the Housing Assistance Plan has been reviewed and a recommendation has been received from the Richfield HRA's Ad Hoc Housing Committee. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richfield approved the proposed three year Community Devel- opment Plan and Housing Assistance Plan and authorizes the Acting City Manager to submit both plans to Hennepin County for considera- tion as part of the Year V Urban Hennepin County Community Develop- ment Block Grant Application. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of February, 1979. ATTEST: Loren L. Law, Mayor Thomas Moran, City Clerk planning area 2 citizen advisory committee 2353 government center, minneapolis,mn 55487 February 20, 1979 The Honorable Loren Law City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Dear Mr. Law: In accordance with the approved Urban Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan, the proposed Community Development Block Grant program of the City of Richfield,was submitted to the Planning Area II Citizen Advisory Committee at its February 13 public hearing. The Planning Area II Citizen Advisory Com- mittee is composed of citizens from Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka, Richfield and St. Louis Park. Each city was asked to appoint an individual who is not an appointed or elected official. The members of the PACAC are to represent the low- and moderate- income persons, the elderly, the handicapped and minorities. As allowed by the Plan, members have invited other residents, who are repre- sentative of the above groups to participate in Committee discussion. The charge of the Committee is to provide citizen comments and recommendations in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the Community Development .Block Grant Program. The Committee has held six meetings prior to the public hearing.. At the meetings the Committee reviewed the requirements and regulations of the Com- munity Development Block Grant and commented onthe•Urban. Hennepin County Comprehensive Development Strategy. The Committee has reviewed the proposed program based upon the elligibility of the projects, the benefit to low and moderate incomed, and compliance with the Urban Hennepin County Comprehensive Community Development: Strategy. The .Committee is submitting the following comments for consideration by the Richfield City Council prior to approval of the final program: I 1. The proposed program (as at=tached) is ar.cepLable rind the Committee recommends approval I 2. Approval of the park developments at Adams Hill Park and, New Ford Town Park is contingent upon a survey that will document that 51;/ or more of the residents of the service area are low- and moderate- incomed. i - 3. Additional funding of planninq activities appears to he high i n lieu of previous funding of $01,692 form Year IV CDBG funds. 4- The Committee requests the opportunity to comment upon the specific projects to be funded under Economic Develop- ment when they are determined The Committee wishes to express its appreciation to the City for its submittal of this proposed program and particular thanks to Rick Jopke for his presentation. The Committee looks forward to the City Council's response to its recommenda- tion and comments and to the program officially adopted by the City of Richfield. Respectfully submitted, /h Jayne Marecek PACAC (II) Chairperson Enclosure • cc: Rich Jopke Loren L. Law, Chairman Housing & Redevelopment Authority 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Subject: Recommendation of Ad Hoc Housinq Committee During the month of February, the Ad Hoc Housing Committee has met to review the proposed Housing Assistance Plan. They spent time reviewing both the one -year and the three -year plans. The Housing Assistance Plans are part of the City's application for a Community Development Block Grant. Following are the recommendations of the housing committee as they relate to each program of the Housing Assistance Plans: 1`. The New Home Program provides new, affordable housing.to moderate- income families. The committee members support this program since it eliminates .substandard homes and also encourages -'home ownership. They agreed that the funds which are available for this program should be used to provide as many new units as possible. They also recommended that the �. Guidelines be amended to include a preference for Richfield residents. 2. There are five programs included to provide rehabilitation assis- tance to homeowners. The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency loans and grants have been successful in the past, and we should continue to participate in their programs. The Housing Assistance Plan includes Community Development Grants for low- income homeowners. This program would supplement the MHFA Grant Program. The committee suggested that the staff look at possible ways tolincrease the total number of grants without increasing the program funds. Several methods were suggested such as; limiting each grant to a smaller amount than is currently available (which is $5,000), or employing one contractor for each specific job; i.e., one roofer for all the roof replacements, one plumber for the plumbing repairs, etc. 2 Staff is also proposing to use Community Development funds for single - ' family handicapped rehabilitation. The committee stated that the funds should be limited to low -or- moderate - income homeowners. The committee also suooested that the staff use any other funds which may be available for handicapped rehabilitation from the state or other sources before they use Community Development funds. Since the need for this program is difficult to determine, the committee recommends that any handicapped rehabilitation funds not used within one year should be transferred to a different program. They suggest that they be added to the New Home Program fund to be used for relocatian payments. That would allow for the purchase of a substandard, occupied unit if the owner wished to sell. 3. The Housing Assistance Plan includes five new rental units. These units were recommended by the Ad Hoc Housing Committee in their January 22 recommendation to the HRA. The HRA is in the process of soliciting developers • for these homes. 4. The three -year HAP proposes a goal of 30 multi - family units for substantial Rehabilitation. Under this program, the Department of Housing and Urban Development would contract directly with the apartment owners. HUD would provide a grant to make energy -and= code - related repairs and handicapped accessibility repairs if the owner would agree to maintain his units within HUD's Fair Market Limit. The housing committee agreed that the; program is worthwhile: They stated that the goal may be difficult to accomplish, but it should remain in the plan. The also noted that no large familylunits are included in the program since there are almost no three- bedrooq multi- family units in Richfield. 5. The final program of the (lousing Assistance Plan is the Section S Leased Existing Program. The committee made several recommendations for this _ program. They feel it is _important to realize that the three -year goal of 100 3 units refers to new families. This goal does not imply an additional 100 families on the program, since there are quite a few participants who discontinue each year. The committee recommended that the number of families receiving Rent Assistance as a percentage of total Richfield residents should not exceed the percentage of total Richfield residents who have low -or- moderate incomes. In other words they wish to avoid a proportionately high influx of low- income residents to Richfield because of the Section 8 program. The committee also re- stated the need for additional senior citizen housing. The.city should seek funds for an additional elderly high -rise as the funds become available. In conclusion, the Ad Hoc Housing Committee recommends that the proposed Housing Assistance Plans be adopted. And that the above - stated suggestions are applied as the plans are implemented. • Respectfully, C D B G 7 Year II 9/77 -8/78 Year III PROJECT SUMMARY Community Center /, A M O U N T Senior Citizen Center $ 50,000 9/75 -8/76 9/76 -8/7 - Water.Backwash System $ 30,000 - - - Memorial Park P R O J E C T Year I 7 Year II 9/77 -8/78 Year III 9/78 -8/79 Year IV Community Center /, Senior Citizen Center $ 50,000 $ 14,850 - - Water.Backwash System $ 30,000 - - - Memorial Park $ 8,855 - - - Fremont Park - $ 4,681 - - Taft Park - $ 15,969 - - Christian Park - $ 80,504 $ 246,000 - Rehabilitation $ 10,000 $ 38,805 $ 92,842 $ 76,384 New Home Program - $ 51,305 - - Land Acquisition - - - $ 100,000 Planning - - - $ 51,692 Adams Hills Park - - - $ 100,000 OMR Approval No. 29 -POrnS - a. NUMBER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE � APNS 3. STATE a• NUMBER APPUCA. L TYPE ❑ PREIPPUG1710N APPU• b. DATEYpr rwextJa day IDENTt. >> DATE year vawtA day . ACTION ® APPLICATIO': CATION 1.4 FSER ASSIGNED 19 (Mark a¢ ❑ NOTIFICATION OF INTENT (OPQ Lo,vs 1Q, bas'rO) ❑ UPOIRT OF F-c0 UL ACTION stank 4. LEGAL APPLICANT /RECIPIENT 5. FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. a.A,pikadMime City of Richfield - - - 'b: crRAaiatitm Uait RD• ! I i• i I I a. D 6700 Portland Avenue South Avenue a. NUMB R °•"K t Richfield want Henne p in b. TITLE (Fran r. Brat. ` Minnesota p ZIP .ate: 554�3 Fad"°` L Contad PVVA (Nava Rick Jopke 869 -7521 extension 202 Ca vp) _ 7. TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APPUCANT•5 PROJECT - 8. TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT A -S'ate R- Community Action AtsntY B- framtsta I.- Higher Educational Institution C- Subluts J- Indian.TNbe _ 46 YEAR V V I I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK Oratact K-Orn.r (Sr.ei;y): 0- C:.ary E - GRANT PROGRAM Fln::r;a - sta-1 onl G- sa.a:,l vt.,a.s r- Dntnet Ent.r appropriate letter E! 9. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE A -basic Gant D- Insurance B- Suppiamantal Grant E --OVw Enter apvro. C Lnen r-.9. ).usr /s) 10. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (No-" of this'. oasnties, 1L - ESTI`1AT_D NU)A• 6") 8ER OF T'ERSONS 1L TYPE OF APPLICATION A-Nm C- Revision E- +U4mM�ution Hennepin BENEFITING B- Ran•wal 0- Conttnwtioa f� Richfield, Minnesota Enter app.aprint, Letter County - 13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 115. TYPE OF CHANGE (For its or Its) _ a. FEDERAL S ,CO s. APPtIGNi b. P=ECf 1 A-I nwss Dollars F-Otbar (Specify): 8-0D .sae DoUsn - b. APPU:JLKTI I C- Inanse Duration. I ' I - lb. PROJECT START 17. PROJECT E- GncalutJOa t. S- ATE .00 - DATE y DURATION Ester Pnat• Iectsr(el I f I 4. LOCAL LOCAL I 00 197 ' SJonUa 1 OO 13. ESTIMATED DATE TO Year t .!A day EXISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER -- - - -- - a OTHER BE SUBMITTED TO i19. }. TOTAL I S O 000.00 FEDERAL AGENCY► 19 20. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Nava, City. Stale :JP adds) 121. REMARKS ADDED HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ❑ Yes ❑ No e; a. To the . best of my knowledge and belraf, data in this preappltation /tppltation ore b. If r•duu•d by OMB Circular A-95 this spo6atios was submitted, pursuar• to in. Dora• Rtrpo,ue a rwtions th•rela, to appropriate dsanagnaus•s and all responses an stuched: spews at:aewai THE true and tarried. tae document Ass been APPLICANT duly authorized by Me t'onming Ludy of ❑ ❑ CERTIFIES the appiksnt and the eppllont Will cmaply (1) _ ❑ . ❑ THAT )a- with the att'en'd aasunaoea It the aselsi- aMs is spwved. R) ❑ ❑ 23, a. TYPED It1LLtiE AND TITLE L SIGNATURE t DATE SIGNED CERTIFYING JOYCE WILDE Year awa.tA day ( SENTATIvE ACTING CITY MANAGE 19 24. AGENCY NAME S.: APPLICA• Ysar oaowtA day TIDN RECEIVED 19 ZIS. ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 127. ADMI NISTRAT)VE. OFFICE 23. FECEFLAL APPLICATICN IDENTIFICATION bee a 29. ADDRESS 130.' FEDERAL GRANT. IDENTIFICATION 3L ACTION TAKEN (32 FUNDING Year w dA day 34:; Year month ear t AWARDED s. FEDERAL S .00 133 ACTION CATE ► 19 STARTING DATE 19 b ►v FL IGW 35. CONTACT FOR ACOITIONAL INFORMA• L REJECTED I .CO TION (Marne aid te.t Pwone wrwber) 36. Year mortA day L1 a. AMPNED FOR 1 e. SATE I .00 ENDING DATE 19 - AmLQ MENT I d LDCAL C0 j 37.' REMARKS ADDED Ts .d. DEFE ?.RED 17 OTNER I I n a. Kf^lCRA1YN i f. TOTAL I S .00 1-1 Yes n No e. in taa,n{ coat. eCion, ass tnnn+•nts r-d Lon dwnntnourw ww• an. .a art wauar provrs.aN a Yaft 1. brad lwrswar A-ia. !ti FEDERAL AGENCY A-95 OFFICIAL (Yost awe te.tpAOwe wo.) e.derr'.. It iii- --Do bee FEDERAL AGENCY i It nu o.•a of rs being mare. I A-9S A1.TipN STANDARD FORIA A21I PAGE 1 (:D -751 424 -101 Frwar o d by t:" Fwrn:.L•.wat+r.ers t;i,crsr 1 -7 r SECTTON IV—REMARKS (Flease.refcreaoe the proper item aumhcr from Sections 1,11 or III, if applicable) w- c U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant Entitlement. Grants Program Assurances The applicant hereby assures and certifies that: (a) It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant, and to execute the proposed program. (b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a reso- lution, motion or similar action authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional informa- tion as may be required. (c) It hascomplied with all the requirements of OMB Circular No. A -95 as modified by 24. CFR 570.310 and that either: (1) Any comments and recommendations made by or through clearinghouses are attached and have been considered- prior.to submission of the application; or (2) The required procedures have been followed and no comments or recommenda- tions have been received. (d) Prior to submission of its application, the applicant has: (1) Prepared a written citizen participation plan, which: (i) Provides an opportunity for citizens to participate in the development of the application, encourages the submission of views and proposals, particularly by residents of blighted neighborhoods and citizens of low- and moderate - income, provides for timely responses to the proposals submitted, and schedules hearings at times and locations which permit broad participation; (ii) Provides citizens with adeguate information concerning the amount of funds available for proposed community development and housing activities, the range of activities that may be undertaken, and other important program, recuire- ments; (iii) Provides for public hearings to obtain the views of citizens on commu- nity development and housing needs; and (iv) Provides citizens with an opportunity to submit comments concerning the community development performance of the applicant. (2) Followed this plan in a manner to achieve full participation of citizens in development of the application. The applicant shall also Follow this plan to achieve full citizen participation in all other stages of the ',program. (e) Its chief executive officer or other officer of applicant approved by HUD: (1) Consents to assume.the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such Act apply to 24 CFR 570; (2) Is authorized and consents on behalf of the applicant and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. page 1 of 4 HUD -7065 (6 -7=) (f) The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maxi- mum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low- and moderate - income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums,or blight. (The requirement for this certification will not preclude the Secretary from approving an application where the applicant certifies,; and the Secretary deter- mines, that all or part of the Community Development Program activities are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specifically explained' in the application in accordance with 9570.302(f).] (g) It will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and require- ments of OMB Circular No. A -102, Revised, and Federal Management Circular 74 -4 as they relate to the application, acceptance, and use of Federal funds under 24 CFR 570, (h) It will administer and enforce, the labor standards requirements set forth in 24 CFR 570.605 and HUD regulations' issued to implement such requirements. (i) It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special recuir.ements of law, ,program requirements, and _other administrative requirements, approved.in accordance with OMB Circular No. A -102, Revised. (j) It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11296, relating to evaluation of flood hazards and Executive Order 11288 relating to the prevention, control, and abatement of water pollution. (k) It will require every building or facility (other than a privately owned residential structure} designed, constructed, or altered with funds provided under 24 CFR 570 to comply with the "American Standard Specifications for Making Buildinas and Facilities Accessible to, and Usable by, the Physically Handicapp- • `ed," Number A- 117.1 -R 1971, subject to the exceptions contained in 41 CFR 101- 19.604. The applicant will be responsible for conducting inspections to insure compliance with these specifications by the contractor. (1) It will comply with: (1) Title VI of the Civil Riqhts Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88 -352), and the regu- lations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part 1), which provides that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise 'sub- jected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to- effectuate this assurance. If any real property or structure there- on is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the applicant, this assurance shall obligate the applicant, Or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. (2) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90- 2;84), as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; and will take action to affirmatively further fair housing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provision of brokerage services. I (3) Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act' of 1974, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part 570.601),' which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, _color', national origin, or sex, be excluded from participaticn in, be denied the benefits of, or be sub- jected to discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds provided under 24 CFR 570. pace 2 of 4 HUD -7063 (6 -75) v • 0 • (4) Executive Order 11063 on equal opportunity in housing and nondiscrimina- tion in the sale or rental of housing built with Federal assistance. (5) Executive Order 11246, and the regulations issuedpursuant thereto (24 CFR Part 130 and 41 CFR Chapter 60), and Section 4(b) of the Grant Agreement, which provides that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in all phases of employment during the performance of Federal or federally assisted construction contracts. Contractors and subcontractors on Federal and federally assisted construction contracts shall take affirmative action to insure fair treatment_ in employment, upgrading, demo- tion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training and apprenticeship. (m) It will comply with Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given to lower - income residents of the project area and contra.cts.for work in connection with the project be awarded to eligible business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by, persons residing in the area of the project. (n) It will: (1) To the greatest extent practicable under State law, comply with Sections 301 and 302 of Title III (Uniform Real Property Acquisition Policy) of the Uni- form Relocation Assistance and Peal Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and will comply with Sections 303 and 304 of Title III, and HUD implementing instruc- tions at 24 CFR Part 42; and (2) Inform affected persons of their rights and of the acquisition policies and procedures set forth in the•regula.tions at 24 CFR Part 42, and 5570.602(b) (o) It will: (1) Comply with Title II (Uniform Relocation Assistance) of the Uniform Relo- cation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and HUD implementinq regulations at 24 CFR Part 42 and 6570.602(a); (2) Provide relocation payments and offer relocation assistance as described in Section 205 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act to all persons displaced as a result of acquisition of real property for an activity assisted under the Community Development Block Grant program. Such payments and assistance shall be provided in a fair and consistent and equitable manner that insures that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment of such persons on account of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income; (3) Assure that, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, comparable decent, safe and sanitary replacement dwellings will 'be available to all displaced families and individuals and that the range of choices, available to such persons will not vary on account of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income; and (4) Inform affected persons of the relocation assistance, policies and _proce- dures set forth in the regulations at 24 CFR Part 42 and 24 CFRi570.602(a). (p) It will establish safecuards to prohibit employees from !using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of beinq motivated by a desire for private vain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. pace 3 of 4 HUD- 7065 (6 -75) • Q (a) It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limits the political activity of emplovees. (r) It will give HUD and zhe Comptroller General through any authorized representatives access to and the right-to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. (s) It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervi- sion which shall be utilized. in the accomplishment of the program are not listed on the Environmental Protection Acencv's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify HUD of the receipt of any communication from the Director of .the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicatinc that a facility to be used in the project is under.consideratio.n for listing by the EPA. (t). It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. Pub. L. 93 -234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December 31, 1973. Section 103(a) reouired, on and after March 2, 1974, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where such insurance is available. as a condition for the receipt of any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisition purposes for use in any area, that has been identi fied by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development as an area having special flood hazards. The phrase "Federal financial assistance" includes any form of loan, grant,.guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disaster assistance loan or-grant, or any other form of direct or indirect Federal assistance. (u) It will, in connection with its performance of environmental assessments under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, . comply with Section 106 of. the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470), Executive Order 11593, and the Preservation of Archeological and Historical Data Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 469a -1, et. sec.) by: (1) Consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer to identify properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of His- toric Places that are subject to adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the proposed activity, and (2) complying with all requirements established by HUD to avoid or mitigate adverse effects upon such properties. page 4 of 4 HUD -706_ (6 -75) • u.5. =vE5tvENf Pic% = CFPI_E : 1978 0.261- 316:202 t it ~ 40 Form Ao=aved nr_ia ti., di_a1910 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COST SUMMARY 1. NAME- OF APPLICANT CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA 2. APP LICATiON /GRANT NUMBER 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY G <• ,.y, � ORIGINAL (each yearl M REVISION, DATED ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED ' FROM TO p August 1, 1979 July 31, 1980 Line I PART A. SUM MARY OF PROGRAM ACTIVITY ( /mpor7ant: See insrr ✓ctionS before classifying Costs.) AMOUNT ( FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 I Acquisition of Real Property I S I S 2 Disposition 3 Public Facilities and Improvements 4 = a Senior Centers b I Parks, Playgrounds and Other Recreational Facilities 250,000 c I Centers for the Handicapped d I Neighborhood Facilities e ( Solid Waste Disposal Facilities f I Fire Protection Facilities and Equipment g Parking Facilities h I Public Utilities, Other Than Water and Sewer Facilities i I Street Improvements i j Water and Sewer Facilities k I Foundations and Platforms for Air Rights Sites I 1 Pedestrian Malls and Walkways ` m I Flood and Drainage Facilities n Specially Authorized Public Facilities and Improvements (List) (11 I S I I (2) i (3) 4 I Clearance Activities 5 i Public Services 6 I Interim Assistance I 7 I Completion of Previously Acproved Urban Renewal Proiects Hepisces Corm NUO-NI t. . svmcn s uusolete race 1 01 paces 6 Y1°° : of pages "UU -IUo7 X0.731 FOR HUD AMOUNT USE ONLY 8 ( Relocation Payments and Assistance 5 IS 9 ( Payments for Loss of Rental Income 10 I Removal of Architectural Barriers 11 I Specially Authorized Assistance to Privately Owned Utilities 12 Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities 60,000 a I Rehabilitation of Public Residential Structures b Public Housing Modernization C Rehabilitation of Private Properties 60, 000 d I Code Enforcement i e Historic Preservation 13 Specially Authorized Economic Development Activities a Acquisition for Economic Development I b I Public Facilities and Improvements. for Economic Development C Commercial. and Industrial Facilities 14 I Special Activities By Local Development Corporations, Etc. (List) a I S bl C d 15 SUBTOTAL 310! 000 16 I Planning and Urban Environmental Design (See Part B of dtis form.) I 000 20,000 � a Development of a Comprehensive Community Deveiopment Plan 20,000 b Development of a Policy-Planning-Management Capacity c I Specially Authorized Comprehensive Planning Activities 17 I General Administration (From Part C, Line 6) 18 I Contingencies and /or Local Option Activities (Not to exceed 10% of amount shown in Part D, Line 1) 19 I TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines 15 through 13) 15330,0,00 5 Y1°° : of pages "UU -IUo7 X0.731 Y2_t 3 of P-' --LS PART B. DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN COSTS Land Use & Housing Plan $4, 000; , Public Facilities Plan 7,500 Implementation Plan 2,000 Printing /Graphics, Postage 2,000 Government review 1,000 Neighborhood Meetings 1,500 Consulting Fees 2,000 - � _ C.`_ck if rpr,;',�ued on a �rr;on�l cacefsi aria arac ^. - - - PART C. GENERAL AD..MINISTRATION COSTS I FOR HUD Line (See instructions for descriptions.of administration activities before Ah1OUVT USE ONLY classifying torts below.) 1 I General Management, Oversight and Coordination S I S 2 I Indirect Costs (Allowable if charged pursuant ro a cost allocation plan) 3 Citizen Participation 4 I Environmental Studies Necessary to Comply With Environmental Regulations 5 Other (List) a { S b C d I , e i 6 Total Generai Acmm siration Costs ;Sum or ".nes I cnrou4n 5) I S S Y2_t 3 of P-' --LS i'aae 4 01 pages HUD -7067 (6-78) Line e'. AMOUNT i'aae 4 01 pages HUD -7067 (6-78) Line I PART D. BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS AMOUNT I FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Entitlement Amount JS 330,0001S 2 Less: Repayment of Urban Renewal /NDP Loans (Attach Schedule), S 3 Grant Withheld for Repayment of HUD- Guaranteed Loan g 4 Grant Amount For Program Activities (Line t minus sum of Lines 2 and 3) 111 S 5 Program Income S I S 6. Surplus from Urban Renewal /NDP Settlement S I S 7 Loan Proceeds S S 8 Reprogrammed Unobligated Funds From Prior Program Year (Attach Schedule) S S 9 I TOTAL BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines ,4 rhru 8).- S 330 000 S Line ( PART E. SUMMARY. OF PROGRAM BENEFIT AMOUNT � FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Costs Subject to Program Benefit Rules S 310, 000 S 2 Expenditures Principally Senefitting Low- and Moderate- Income Persons is 310,00 0 S 3 Line 2 as a Percent of Line 1 100 %1 4 I Other Expenditures S 0 I S 5 I Line 4 as a Percent of Line t % I i i i'aae 4 01 pages HUD -7067 (6-78) �r Form Approved (AMR Ni, . A4.ptR70 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT t. NAME•OF APPLICANT - ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF' •R I C.HF I ELD MINNESOTA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER - - PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY y� 4. Ip,J ORIGINAL (each pee /). FROM TO - n REVISION,, DATED AUGUSTA, 1979 JULY 31, 1980 I CJ AMENDMENT, DATED S. NAME OF PROJECT I 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS ` i Adams Hill -Park Development I Under Review S. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT S. TELEPHONE NUMBER Richfield Park 86-9-7521 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The project involves the planning, design and construction of a major neighborhood park in an area not presently served by developed city park facilities. The City of Edina is cooperating in the project o insure that there wi.11 be no unnecessary duplication of facilities in the area. $100,000.was approved in Year IV CD funding for architectural fees, neighborhood citizen participation meetings, design and some preliminary site work. Year V funds will be used to carry out the construction of the parka O Check if continued on additionalpage(s) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACT (S) /ENUMERATIONDISTRICTIS) -ar is located in census tract Z43 and would serve a portion -of o ulations in census tracts 242 243. 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS To provide needed park facilities to low and moderate income persons in an area not presently served by such facilities. ❑ Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 13. COSG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in rnousanos of $) (List component activities using names ofacrivitiesshown CDBG OTHER in Part A, COSTSUMMARy, Fo— HUD•7067.) LOWiMOO OTHER I AMOUNT I SOURCE I BENEFIT BENEFIT (a) IN I(c) (d) (e) ..Public facilities (park dev.) s 250 I$ - Is 0 I ' 14. Totals s 250 Is is 0 1 I5. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block Grant r unds. (Sum of Columns b and c) s 250,000 Replaces Form HUD- 7015.1, nnicn is UDSOIe[e page of Pages Replaces Form HUD•7015.1, wn,cn s Casojete _ Page of pages U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM- CITY OF RICHFIELD, , MINNESOTA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY p�o1 a, ,l�i ORIGINAL (each year). FROM O q ❑ REVISION, DATED August 1, 1979 July 31, 1980 i ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED 5. NAME OF PROJECT 1 6. PROJECT NUMBER I 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Housing Rehabilitation i ) Certification 8, ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT I 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Richfield H - 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Provide grants to low and moderate income persons and the handicapped to rehabilitate single family dwellings., This. shall include grants for rehabilitation of single family dwellings for handicapped, grants to low and moderate income persons for flood proofing homes in areas where flood problems.have occurred in the past. Flood proofing grants shall be used for such things as water proof doors, glass block windows and low walls to divert water away from homes and grants for general repairs to low income persons. ❑ Check if continued on additional pages) and attach. 11, CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) City -wide with concentration in census tract 243. 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Improve the housing conditions and housing options of low and moderate . income persons within the city. ❑ Check if continued cn additional page(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in tnousanas of S) (List component activities using names of activities shown CDBG j OTHER in Part A, COSTSUMMARY, FormHUO.7067.) LOW /MOD I OTHER BENEFIT BENEFIT I AMOUNT I SOURCE (al I (b) j (c) j (d) (e) e a ( Itat(on an preservation activities IS 60 IS - Is 0 I I I I I I 14. Totals S 60 5 _ is o 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block HL04C66 t6-7B) Grant Funes (Sum of Columns b ana ct S 80 000 Replaces Form HUD•7015.1, wn,cn s Casojete _ Page of pages U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM- CITY OF RICHFIELD, , MINNESOTA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY p�o1 a, ,l�i ORIGINAL (each year). FROM O q ❑ REVISION, DATED August 1, 1979 July 31, 1980 i ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED 5. NAME OF PROJECT 1 6. PROJECT NUMBER I 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Housing Rehabilitation i ) Certification 8, ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT I 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Richfield H - 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Provide grants to low and moderate income persons and the handicapped to rehabilitate single family dwellings., This. shall include grants for rehabilitation of single family dwellings for handicapped, grants to low and moderate income persons for flood proofing homes in areas where flood problems.have occurred in the past. Flood proofing grants shall be used for such things as water proof doors, glass block windows and low walls to divert water away from homes and grants for general repairs to low income persons. ❑ Check if continued on additional pages) and attach. 11, CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) City -wide with concentration in census tract 243. 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Improve the housing conditions and housing options of low and moderate . income persons within the city. ❑ Check if continued cn additional page(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in tnousanas of S) (List component activities using names of activities shown CDBG j OTHER in Part A, COSTSUMMARY, FormHUO.7067.) LOW /MOD I OTHER BENEFIT BENEFIT I AMOUNT I SOURCE (al I (b) j (c) j (d) (e) e a ( Itat(on an preservation activities IS 60 IS - Is 0 I I I I I I 14. Totals S 60 5 _ is o 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block HL04C66 t6-7B) Form Approved OMB No. 63•P1619 MINNESOTA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF. •RICHFIELD , M 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY nf-, a, t� ORIGINAL (each year) _ FROM 0 REVISION, OATEQ 110 AUGUST 1, 1979 JULY 31, 1980 ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED S. NAME OF PROJECT I 6. PROJECT NUMBER I 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATVS Planning Exemnt 8. ENTITY \VITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9: TELEPHONE NUMBER - RICHFIELD P 869 -7521 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This project involves the development of a comprehensive plan in accordance with Minnesota Statute 473.851. Elements included in the plan include housing, land use, airport concerns, public facilities and imp - lementation plan. F7 Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACT(SVENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) City-wide 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS The-comprehensive plan will assess the present state of the city, will help identify the needs of low and moderate income people and will be the basis for city - policies necessary for meeting identified city needs. - ❑ Check if continued on additional pace(s) and attach. ' 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES (List component activities using names of activities shown PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in thousands or S) CDBG I OTHER LOW /MOO BENEFIT ---[- I OTHER BE -NEFIT AMQUNT SOURCE in Part A, COSTSUMMARY, Form HUD - 7067.1 fa! (b) I (c) (d) (el Planni S �S 12�t S I 14. Totals ; S S 20 ! S 15. Total Coss To Be Pad Witn Community Development Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) S Replaces Form HUD - 7015.1, wnict+ <fs Unsotete Page of pages Hi;0 -7066 %6 -7e1 exempt from program benefit rule Form Approved r1r_AA N� FZ_ai$zlo U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COST SUMMARY' R 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER Form Approved r1r_AA N� FZ_ai$zlo nepiaces rotm riuu• /:Uit;.:), lynicn is uusolete r2ce I of p2ces rru;i•;Jor to. ;Z) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COST SUMMARY' 1. NAME OF APPLICANT CITY OF RICHFIELD. MINNESOTA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY <. ® ORIGINAL (each year) Ci REVISION, DATED G AMENOMENT,DATEO FROM AUGUST 1, 1980 TO JULY 31, 1981 Line � PART A. SUMrAARY OF PROGRAM ACTIVITY (/mpor iant: See instructions before classifying costs.) AMOUNT FOR HUD I USE ONLY 1 I Acquisition of Real Property S ( S 2 Disposition 3 Public Facilities and Improvements a Senior Centers b Parks, Playgrounds and Other Recreational Facilities 60,000 c I Centers for the Handicapped d I Neighborhood Facilities I. e I Solid Waste Disposal Facilities f I Fire Protection Facilities and Equipment' g I Parking Facilities h I Public Utilities, Other Than Water and Sewer Facilities i Street Improvements i j Water and Sewer Facilities k I Foundations and Platforms for Air Rights Sites I I - Pedestrian Malls and Walkways M I Flood and Drainage Facilities n Specially Authorized Public Facilities and Improvements (List)' (1) ( S (2) 1 ` (3) 4 I Clearance Activities 5 i Public Services 6 I Interim Assistance 7 I Completion of Previously Aooroved Urban Renewal Pro ects nepiaces rotm riuu• /:Uit;.:), lynicn is uusolete r2ce I of p2ces rru;i•;Jor to. ;Z) 1,2- : 01 paws nub. -;w; io• ;s1 AMOUNT I'- FORHUDr USE ONLY �t I I Relocation Payments and Assistance 1,2- : 01 paws nub. -;w; io• ;s1 AMOUNT I'- FORHUDr USE ONLY g I Relocation Payments and Assistance IS IS 9 Payments for Loss of Rental Income 10 Removal of Architectural Barriers 4O , 000 11 Specially Authorized Assistance to Privately Owned Utilities i 12 Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities 1105,000 a I Rehabilitation of Public Residential Structures b Public Housing Modernization c Rehabilitation of Private Properties d Code Enforcement e Historic Preservation 13 Specially Authorized Economic Development Activities i 125,000 a Acquisition for Economic Development i b Public Facilities and Improvements for Economic Deveiopment 125 000 C Commercial, and Industrial Facilities i 14 Special Activities By Local Development Corporations, Etc. (List) a I S I b ( ' c d I I. 15 SUBTOTAL 330,000 16 Planning and Urban Environmental Design (See Part B of this form.) a Development of a Comprehensive Community Development Plan I b Development of a Policy- Plannino- Management Capacity e Specially Authorized Comprehensive Planning Activities 17 General Administration (From Part C, Line o) 16 Contingencies and /or Local Option Activities (Not to exceed 10% of amountshdwn in Part 0, Line 1) 19 I TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lmes 15 through 13) 1'330,000 S 1,2- : 01 paws nub. -;w; io• ;s1 PART B. DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN COSTS - _ Che& if continued on additional oaoe(s) and attach. Line PART C. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION COSTS (See instructions for descriptions of administration activities before classifying costs below.) FOR HUD AMOUNT I USE ONLY I 1 I General Management, Oversight and Coordination S I S 2 I Indirect Costs (Allowable if charged pursuant to a cost allocation plan) 3' I Citizen Participation 4 I Environmental Studies Necessary to Comply With Environmental Regulations 5 Other (List) a i S bl Cj d� e� 6 I Total General Aaministration Costs (Sum of Lrnes 1 mrougn 5) I S S I i Page 4 01 plies HUD-7067 I6-7 i r r AMOUNT I i Page 4 01 plies HUD-7067 I6-7 i one PART D. BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS AMOUNT I FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Entitlement Amount $ 330.000 is 2 Less: Repayment of Urban Renewal /NDP Loans (Amch Schedule) S 3 Grant Withheld for Repayment of HUD-Guaranteed Loan S 4 I Grant Amount For Proaram Activities (Line 1 minus sum of Lines 2 and 3) S I S 5 Program Income S S 6. Surplus From Urban Renewal /NDP Settlement S I S 7 Loan Proceeds S S 8 Reprogrammed Unobligated Funds From Prior Program Year (Attach Schedule) f S ' S 9 I TOTAL BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines 4 thru 8) . IS330,000 ( S Line PART E. SUMMARY OF PROGRAM BENEFIT AMOUNT FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Costs Subject to Program Benefit Rules S290,0001 S 2 Expenditures Principally Benefitting Low- and Moderate- Income Persons S290,0001 S 3 Line 2 as a Percent of Line 1 100 %1 % 4 Other Expenditures S 40,000 I S 5 I Line 4 as a Percent of Line 1 13.8 % I % i I i Page 4 01 plies HUD-7067 I6-7 i Form Approved OMB No. 63 -R1619 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. NAME OF APPLICANT.. City -. of R i.c. h I e. l d ANNUALCOMMUNITY - DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4. ® ORIGINAL (each Year) ❑ REVISION,OATED FROM TO _ August 1980 J u l y - 1981 I ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED - S. NAME OF PROJECT 16. PROJECT NUMBER i 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS New Ford Town Park 9, TELEPHONE NUMBER S. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT - Richfield Park & Recreation Department 869-7521 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This project involves providing general improvements to the existing New Ford Town Park. The park has been subject to vandalism and general wear. Funds will be used for necessary repairs and replacements to make the park more vandal - resistent. Possible acquisition of adjacent properties will be explored also. An income survey will be completed to prove program benefit. ❑ Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 11, CENSUS TRACT(SVENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) 249.01 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Provide improved park facilities to an idolated low and moderate income neighborhood. ❑ Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES I PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in thousands of S) CDBG OTHER (List component activities using names of activities shown LOw/MOD I OTHER AMOUNT SOURCE in Part A, COS7SUMMARY, FormHUD- 7067.) BENEFIT BENEFIT (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Is IS IS Public Facilities (park 60 - 0 improve. i I Is 60 Is — i s 0 14. Totals 15, Total Coss To Be Paid With Community Development Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) S 6 0 0 0 0 Replaces Form HUC- 7015:1, wn,ch is Obsolete Page of pages HUD -7066 (6.7e) J rt U.S. dEP .1 4,V ENT pF HOUS1ryG - COM MU ANp URBAN DEV~ NfTY °EVELOPMEN- Ef.CPyfENT c tl PROJrCT$V PROGRAM 1. NAME. FROM 3. PgR10D OF ll?MAR}, CITY of APPIICANr AUGUST ?• APP OF RICH FIELD N .} ST 1, 198p TO LICAT10NiGR T MI N NUMBER L/H ME OF PROJEC- 0. /N PURL 1 JULY 31, 1982 ORIGIN4 e• ENTrrY wlr C 1 MPROV I�REVSi L /eaehYee�/ R 1 CHF I EL H RESPp,NSrar EMENTS d D HOU urY pN' °Ayr o. 70, dESCRJP710 FOR CA RR YIN 1 6, PROJECT V AMENDMENT OATE —` NUMBER The co N of p o J NO AND RED V G qur THE PROj =eT �. E NvrRpNl� �` ENT• cons tr PMENj Unde "` REVIEW r N)cOj;eP�ng tOO °r Public im 0 9' rQIEPH rev* l a NU,t! Statutes Redeyel MP ove traffic MP BER. ments s for Pment Projec c and Pedes Such as Streets add;tio�1'j act deter, Oratlon and Area (LHNtrian moveme� sidewalks na1 Jobs f a sti'on blight, )' The LHN nt in the alks� and or lowmulus and modern r� Vate Tnve ons truce n ect meets daa, e /Hu.b/ A '.. to Income stment ;n °f Pubi ;C l state Persons, the area andlmProve- y Provide ? 77• CENSUS T census t 19ACT(S) /E 72 ANT ClPgTraCt �4/. ERAT/ONO'111c �31f COntIAUBaOAadd %t' _ Redeve l° EDACCOM'. SHMENT rOgg /PaOefs /an0'attdC . a - of the pment Of S n 1; . ' be ava; lab city and to p oviden9' central bus low and moderate d!tco na l f d 10 Jobs a to ncrea 7a. COgc °pMP me persons • a maJori ty of whi � ax base se i ONE � w 1 1 /List aamPonen NT ACT,VIT tes CSeck%fC I %n Pert t aCtiYitier u Te Oqt %gUEC d/ `I. COST gU yARY 9na r °fa<tiv"ii Oq ad t %Oqa /pcOei M FOryn Hu0 es rh°wn PROC; s/ any attach. / CD AMY; /a/ lolyiMOO 3(, ! -AR fUP'lI thousands S eC . BEN @FIT � OTHER of S/' deve i o ' /b/ gENEFI T ' AMO OTHcn Pmen t / uNr' activ. S /c/ � ties �S sOURC; ' 370 1 5628 I ' spec i a 1 assessments 74. rot.,. ' 15 � 1 ' • Total Co" 1 •S 7• S Reu,a�ft o se Pald With Cc i 1 ' ° "^ HUD, m-unlry p 3 %0 ;s 015.1. ODsp'ere eVe1p I� °n'ent s1p"c Grant F S 628 p`re un'S (Sum of of pikes Co /�mns b ano c/ S :430 00 0 r a�Y , Mr.•2a 41. `._ Form Aop.oved f)AAC M- az_viaio t 1. NAME OF APPLICANT CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER Form Aop.oved f)AAC M- az_viaio Replaces Form HUD•7015.5• wn,cn n Ubsoiere face 1 01 paces U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN O= VELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COST SUMMARY 1. NAME OF APPLICANT CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER 3. 'PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY. - G. ICJ ORIGINAL teach year) G REVISION, DATED G AMENDMENT, DAT FROM TO AUGUST 1, 1981 JULY 31, 1982 Line I PART A. SUMMARY OF PROGRAM ACTIVITY (lmpor:ant: Sae instructions before classifying costs.) AtlOUNT ( FOR HUD US=- ONLY 1 Acquisition of Real Property i S S 2 Disposition 3 Public Facilities and Improvements a Senior Centers b • ( Parks, Playgrounds and Other Recreational Facilities C I Centers for the Handicapped I d ( Neighborhood Facilities �• e I Solid Waste Disposal Facilities f Fire Protection Facilities and Equipment g I Parking Facilities h Public Utilities, Other Than Water and Sewer Facilities i I Street Improvements I j Water and Sewer Facilities k I Foundations and Platforms for Air Rights Sites i I Pedestrian Malls and Walkways m I Flood and Drainage Facilities n I Specially Authorized Public Facilities and Improvements (List) (1) ` S I (2) i I (3) 1 4 I Clearance Activities 5 I Public Services 6 I Interim Assistance 7 I COmDietion of Previously Acoroved Urban Renewal Projects Replaces Form HUD•7015.5• wn,cn n Ubsoiere face 1 01 paces i'a _ OI Yaks HUD-7067,6-78) AMOUNT FOR HUD USE ONLY 8 Relocation Payments and Assistance S �S 9 Payments for Loss of Rental Income i 10 I Removal of Architectural Barriers 11 Specially Authorized Assistance to Privately Owned Utilities 12 Rehabiiitation and Preservation Activities 85.000 a Rehabilitation of Public Residential Structures b Public Housing Modernization C Rehabilitation of Private Properties $ 000 d Code Enforcement e Historic Preservation 13 Specially Authorized Economic Development Activities T245.000 a Acquisition for Economic Development ' b I Public Facilities and Improvements for Economic Development 2 4 5, 000 i c Commercial. and Industrial Facilities 14 Special Activities By Local Development Corporations, Etc. (List) a S b c d 15 SUBTOTAL i 330,000 I 16 Planning and Urban Environmental Design fSee Part B of this form.) a Development of a Comprehensive Community Development Plan b Development of a Policy - Planning- Management Capacity e Specially Authorized Comprehensive Planning Activities i 17 General Administration (From Part C, Line 6) 18 I Contingencies and /or Locai Option Acnviaes (Not to exceed 10% of amount shown in Part D, Line 1) 19 I TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines 15 through 18) 15330 ,000 S i'a _ OI Yaks HUD-7067,6-78) :02 3 of p1CS PART B. DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN COSTS Check if continued on additional cace(s) and attach. V;. E PART C. GENERAL AD...MINISTRATION COSTS (See instructions for descriptions of administration activities before I classifying costs below.) :02 3 of p1CS PART B. DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING AND URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN COSTS Check if continued on additional cace(s) and attach. Line PART C. GENERAL AD...MINISTRATION COSTS (See instructions for descriptions of administration activities before I classifying costs below.) AMOUNT FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 General Management, Oversight and Coordination S j S 2 Indirect Costs (Allowable if charged pursuant to a cost allocation plan) 3 Citizen Participation 4 Environmental Studies Necessary to Comply With Environmental Regulations 5 Other (List) a I S b C d e l 6 I Total General Administration Costs (Sum of Lanes 1 orougn 5) IIS S i :02 3 of p1CS Faze 4 of aaP,-s �,u0-7067 !6 -75) Line PART D. BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS AMOUNT I FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Entitlement Amount S 330,000 I S 2 Less: Repayment of Urban Renewal /NDP Loans ( Atrach Schedule) S 3 Grant,Withheld for Repayment of HUD- Guaranteed Loan S 4 ( Grant Amount For Program Activities (Line 1 minus sum of Lines 2 and 31 � S 111 I S 5 Program Income S I S 6.. Surplus From Urban Renewal /NDP Settlement S ( S 7 Loan Proceeds S -J. S 8 TReprogrammed Unobligated Funds From Prior Program Year (Attach Schedule) S -7 I S 9 TOTAL BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines 4 thru 8). S 330,000 S Line PART E. SUMMARY. OF PROGRAM BENEFIT AMOUNT I FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Costs Subject to Program Benefit Rules S 330,000 I S 2 Expenditures Principally Benefitting Low- and Moderate- Income Persons S I S 3 Line 2 as a Percent of Line 1 d 100 4 I Other Expenditures S 0 I S 5 Line 4 as a Percent of Line 1 100 a I o Faze 4 of aaP,-s �,u0-7067 !6 -75) . t m 0 c Q 0 LL rc �O` ' Z tI� � ;: •:7 L ! I ¢ ~ ,� mk'n C Imo) w� _ C) mom OI 0, H �!Zle H �� IC' I� - I Y s W I- � I.r\ O m ` I Q I 3 w... N - M r El c L; 1 0 O J I w n Z F- .n. - Z I LL _ _ _� O O m.. Q Q O W - .ILL C H O_ Q 2�LL Qa L O Lr1 O Ll I- w i W - O %.D N O'l 01© 3� N < z H Z_ 2 (� T w { O O W C .� +_ W Z I` N N 0 00 W,N < > Cl j 2 Q rry > D Z-- I-.. O O O a l W < ! Q` ^ O u I I N M y M Z m ¢ cv VS d' c _D p F.. 0:::7wZF- ZwwO I = I Z O Z z Z< 'o X X X X X 11 y I- Q Q r < c \ =LULL WcWzUw ZI (L fit W LL O i CQ'l t O \ NF- l_'Q1-•WCi} I 2i ..i o ao ! W I J �.p Q f-C Yi fl. ¢ U w v^ O I ui P Y { C rJ 0 UI ¢ I" LL e `Z O L zI w1 O U w - ro QI Q _ CL it _ 3 S pl O 1 O E N >I < (n m c •- Z _ W w p .� •- fo iJ O OI z b y r Q Ul CY) a) V +J t rn C rn E o— �, a� •- +J _0 c O a> u Q I I -j I¢ = c ro a a) ro > w t O > O_ a) °! �� 3l c�i= cu ,- N O O I •� J Lt. ! J 0� (3) a U L c vI, Z rn N c ro - E O w OI Z i2 I< Y Q C � - U — l- E O W I <�.¢ 1" _ C _ O O wlv CZ J ! i O Ln �C C o a �C v c ~ I X w la lL'Z I� C 7 L ro c L L Q O co -- rp O ro 0 U J i �I w � w i< I r- I = O_ O_ _ 4-J O_ LL w < U r, iU IU O JI GI '. IC, >- 1 C H Z UI< �L j N M _:r LA a q u OCC I �. . Ze Ir � a<=O ( \O (- \ .: Z a q u 'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT aLUCK GRAN I PAOGRAM T C l t Of Richfield 3. Oescrihe those acrions necessary 'o fac:iirate the accompiisnment of the goals I CHECK IF APPLICANT WISHES TO REVIEW ALL STATE HFOA HOUSING PROPOSALS. L e..•0ui �li tinn .gt)t.atuoto .,( ir.: ')93 :;p. * 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TA13LE 111 - THREE YEAR HOUSING PROGRAM g — THREE YEAR GOAL 4, C:R ORIGINAL 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO August 1979 July 1982 ❑ REVISION. GATE C AMENDMENT, OATS NUMBER OF LOWER - INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED' ELDERLY TYPES AND SOURCES OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE (1- Zpersans) ! SMALL FAMILY LARGE FAMILY TOTAL ANO (4 or less (5 or more HANOI- CAPPEOJ I persons) I persons) (al (b) i (c! (d) (el 11 Ar Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Homeowners 252 76 , 156 20 (sum of lines 2 and 5) 2 1 1. New Construction Assistance for Homeowner I 0 I 2 ! 5 (sum of 3 and 41 7 3 HUD Assistea Programs 0 4j Other 7 0 2 5 5 2: R.enabihtation Assistance for Homeowners 245 76 i 154 5 (sum of lines o, 7 and 81 6 Community Oevelooment Block Grants 110 i 1 55 9 7 HUD Assisted Programs 135 _ 30 99 a Other, 9 S. Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Homeowners oy 1 OO°ro 1 30.2 °ro 61.9 °�0 7.9 Percentage of Household Type 101 C. Total Goals for Housing Assistance ror venters 135 j 42 i 86 7 (sum of lines 11, 14, 17 +- 231 1. Assistance for•Prosoective Homeowners O (sure of lines 12 4- 131 1� HUD Assisted Programs i 13 ! Other' I t4 2. New Rental Units 4 (slim of lines 15 4. 161 1 15 _ HUD Assisted Programs 5 1 4 16 tner 171 3. Rehabilitation of Rental Units 30 16 14 0 (sum of lines 18, 19 1 12) is! Community Development Block Grants 0 16 14 _ 0 191 HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines 20 - 21) 201 Substantial Reilabilitation 21 Section 8 Existing with Moderate Rehabilitation 30 16 14 0 221 Other' 23 4. Zxisting Rental Units (sum of lines 24 f 271 100 I 25 72 3 241 HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines 25 + 26) 100 25 72 3 251 With Repair Without Repair - — - 777 -- J 261 271 Other' 28; O. Total Goals "ror " ousinq Assistance. ror R.?nt ?rs ov 1 0040 31.1 °/ 63.7 5.2- 1 Percentage of Housenold Tvoe 291 E. Total Goals for HUD Assisrea Rental Until ov 1 CO °.o " 31.1 " ' 63.7 ° 5.2 a ?rcentage of �- ious?nold TVOP NARRATIVE (Atrach a(4diriona( sheers tf na.`essar/ and idenrify :vi t" irems aoove) i' 1 Footnote units to he omvided ;oec:fic30y 'or he handic3ooed. 3. Oescrihe those acrions necessary 'o fac:iirate the accompiisnment of the goals I CHECK IF APPLICANT WISHES TO REVIEW ALL STATE HFOA HOUSING PROPOSALS. L e..•0ui �li tinn .gt)t.atuoto .,( ir.: ')93 :;p. * Years V, VI, VII ' Community Development Block Grant Incentive Grant Low - income Grant Hand. Rehab Grant Other MHFA Grants MHFA Loans a Total EId /Handicapped Family Large Family 110 46 55 9 75 24 48 3 27 14 7 6 8 8 0 0 135 30 99 6 .. 30 9 15 3 105 21 811 3 ,J.S.OEPAAT\XEN OF AN.L --BAN DEV__...1 ',EN; - CGUMUNITYr,��:c;OPMcw: Ji-CC ✓WANTRRG7nAM CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA le- '.' HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN 2. APPL'iCATION /GRANT NUMBER TABLE IV GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED HODS • 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4, ® ORIGINAI. FROM TO Q REVISION, DATE_ August 1, 1979 July 31, 1982 may_ ❑ AMENDMENT, OATE A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION 1. New Construction: Census Tract or Enumeration District Numbers, or other locational designation CITY WIDE 2. Rehabilitation: Census Tract or Enumeration District Numbers, or other Iocatlonal designation City -wide with a concentrated public information effort in portions of tracts 242 and 243 to make property owners aware of rehabilitation programs available. • B. EXPLANATION OF SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS 1. New Construction The City of Richfield is a fully developed suburb. Locations of cities for new construction are limited. Site selection will be based on availabillity of sites with substandard dwellings on them. Specific sites have not yet been selected. 2. Rehabilitation Rehabilitation will be city -wide based on applications received. An effort will be made to concentrate rehab efforts in the area of Adams Hill Park in' conjunction with.thepark development project. Aeplseee h ;JfT hU0• IOI 5, I I, Nfllr�7 .s Gbsaero MUO.•:oQ_+ a U.S. OEpAA i M=NT L.- '10USiNG3 ,:.h:..� ,.AN �•c /c .G2t�tc,vT City of Richfield ` COMMUNITY OEVELCPMENT BLOCK GRANT DROGRAM 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER HOUSING ASSISTANCE ?`LAN TABLE V- ANNUAL HOUSING ACT10N PROGRAM $ ANNUAL GOAL 4 ORIGINAL 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY FROM TO ❑ REVISION, DATE August 1, 1979 July 31, 1980 LJ AMENDMENT, DATE NUMBER OF LOWER- INCOME HOUSEHOLDS'TO BE ASSISTED ELDERLY SMALL- LARGE TYPES AND SOURCES OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE - TOTAL (1- 2personsl I AND FAMILY FAMILY HANDI• (d or less (5 or more CAPPED �l j persons)- personsl (a) (b) . (cJ . (d) (e) A. Total Goais for Housing Assistance for Homeowners 83 ! 25 51 7 I (sum of lines 2 and 51 1. New Construction Assistance for Homeowners i 2 I 0 I 0 2 2` (sum of lines 3 and 4) j i 3 1 HUD Assisted Programs i 0 0 4 Other' Local New Home Program 2 0 S I 2. Rehabilitation Assistance for Homeowners j I j%m of lines 6, 7 and d) 81 25 3 15 51 18 5 3 6 ! Community Development Block Grants *see attached — — -- I � 7.. HUO Assisted Programs � -.�_ a -- Other MHFA Grants and Loans *see attach Ed 4� 1 � 9 i B. Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Renters i (sum of -lines 10, 13, 16 and 22) 8 22 5i 10 1. Assistance for Prosoecnve Homeowners I { I (sum_ of lines 11 4-12) i - 11'1 HUD Assisted Proarams 12 Other' ` 13 I 2. New Rental Units ' (sum of lines 14 and 151 ( 1 14 i HUD Assisted Programs 5 1 0 4 15 Other` I 16 3. Rehabilitation of Rental Units ; (sum of lines 17, 18 and 21) j 17 i Community Oevetooment dlocx Grants 18 HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines 19 4-20) 19 Substantial Rehabilitation -- 20 Section 8 Existing with Moderate Rehabilitation 21� Other• —• -- _ .. 22 4. Existing mental Units I (sum of Unes 23 + 261 35 7 ''I i 27 1 23 - _ -_HUD Assisted Programs (sum of!ines 24 +25) - -- _ 35 7 - -_� __27 24 I With Revair 25 . without R.oa,r 35 �IAARATIVE /Anacn arldtrionai sneers ;r necessary and .dennfy ;vtth �temsanovei ',' J 1. Footnote units to be provided specifically for the !iandicanoed. ` 2. Describe the rrogrrni iistea jnder ,his category. 3. Describe chose acvons necessar,/ to facilitate the accomolishment of -he goais. Incremental Year of jul7mtisinn Tahles 1, 11 and IV of the Three 'Y-?ar HAP aporoved Z incorporated by reference and are not contained n this (secon(r) ethrrnl near ,urm.tsxra^r n..v i�us En�nor..s llheni�tn iuo i095 ttM3 YEAR V Community Development Block Grants Incentive Grant Low- income Grant Handicapped Rehab Other MHFA Grants MHFA Loans Total Eld /Handi.capped Family Large Famil 36 15 18 3 25 8 16 1 9 5 2 2 2 2 0 0 45 10 33 2 10 3 6 1 35 4; RICHFIELD MINNESOTA TY OF CI Office of City - Manager Council Letter No. 52 Agenda February '26,- 1979` The Honorable Mayor and , Members of the City Council' City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Amendment to Agreement for Local:,' Planning Assistance Grant On February 13, 1978, the city council approved an agree -- ment with the Metropolitan Council, awarding a $6,089 local planning assistance grant to the City of Richfield. This grant is to be used to revise the city's comprehensive plan in accordance with requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning ; Act. on December 14; 1978, the Metropolitan Council awarded an additional $5'262 to Richfield for use in the comprehensive plan revision.. It.is necessary that the city amend the original grant agreement to reflect the additional funding,,before ' the s:e additonal monies will be conveyed to the city. Attached to this council letter is a resolution authorizing the amendment to the Local Planning Assistance agr ement between the City of Richfield and the Metropolitan Council.for purposes of receiving an additional ,$5,262. It is the, reco endation of the planning and redevelopment director, in which concur, that the city council adopt this resolution, approving the amendment to the grant agreement, and authorizing the 'acting city manager to submit the amended grant agreement to the "Metropolitan Council. Respectfully submitted, J ce Wil e A ing City Manager JLW /eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director I RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION REQUESTING 1978 -79 LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS FROM THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.851 - 473.872, requires that the City of Richfield prepare and submit 'a comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council and the City of Richfield entered into a contract`, numbered 7844 and dated March 3, 1978 for a Local Planning Assistance Grant for 1976 -77 grant funds in the amount of $6,089 to assist the City of Richfield in carrying out the required planning; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has allocated $5,.262 to the City of Richfield in additional grant funds for 1978 -79; and I WHEREAS, the total grants from the Metropolitan Council will j not exceed 75% of the total cost or 100 % of the remaining cost of carrying out the required planning which is documented in Appendix A • of the above - referenced contract. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Richfield.requests the additional 1978 -79 grant funds and authorizes the Acting City Manager to execute the Agreement Amendment to the above- referenced contract on behalf of the City of-Richfield. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 26th day of February 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk Loren L. Law, Mayor CONTRACT NO. 7844 j FIRST AMENDMENT TO GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF RICHFIELD WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council, hereinafter referred to as the "Council," and the C;ty of Richfield hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee" have previously entered into a grant agreement for a local planning assistance grant, Metropolitan Council Contract No. 7844 , dated March 3 , 1978 hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement." and WHEREAS, the Council has awarded $ 5.262 in 1978 -79 entitlement funds to the Grantee from funds appropriated by Minnesota Laws 1977, Chapter 455, Section 19, Subdivision 3, for the preparation of its comprehensive plan required by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the above- referenced agreement shall be amended in the following particulars: 1. Paragraph IA is amended to read as follows: "The Council shall pay to the Grantee, in accordance with the schedule set forth below a total grant amount of $ 11 351 Grant funds shall be made available to the grantee as follows: $ iU,2 -I ',immediately upon execution of this Agreement. $ 1.135 upon satisfactory evaluation by the Council of the funded portion completion reports submitted by the Grantee pursuant to Paragraph 4B of this Agreement." 2. Paragraph 1B is amended to read as follows: "B. The Grantee agrees that of the total cost of carrying out the work program set forth in Grantee's application for grant assistance, Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, no more than 75% shall be financed by grant funds awarded by this Agreement, and that no more than 100% shall be financed by grant funds awarded by this Agreement plus grant funds from other sources of financial assistance." 3. Paragraph 1D is amended to read as follows: "D. The Grantee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Metropolitan Council-"Application, Award and Disbursement Guidelines.for the.Administration of Planning Assistance Grants," hereinafter referred to as the "Guidelines" dated October 26, 1978, and dated April 1977, which are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part hereof. 4. A new Appendix A, identified as "Amended Appendix A" and attached hereto and made a part hereof is substituted for the Appendix A of the original Grant Agreement.', S. A new Appendix B, identified as "Amended Appendix B" and attached hereto and made a part hereof, is substituted for the Appendix.B of the original Grant Agreement. Except as hereby amended, the provisions of the above- referenced contract shall remain in force and effect without change. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on this day of 1979. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND ADEQUACY Office of Staff Counsel Metropolitan Council I� By Chairman GRANTEE By Title: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 1 55I01 �••• • COMMUNITY GRANT APPLICATION APPENDIX A 1. Name of Community Richfield, Minnesota 2. Name of local Contact Person Richard C. X- er+ Telephone Number ( 612) 869-7521 X 2 5 9 3. Work Program Outline the major tasks and the total Costi of those tasks which must be undertaken in order to prepare or update the community's comprehensive plan according to its systems statement, and prepare and adopt its official Controls. The outline should follow the format shown on the back of this application form, Please refer to the attached prospectus L 11 . �,�; _ cT 4. Completion Date Estimated completion date of the Work, Program July. 1980. 5. Previous Planning Indicate whether this work program reflects the cost of updating a previously prepared plan and. if so, describe to what extent the plan(s) will be utilized in developing the community's Comprehensive Plana This prospectus is designed to update a previously prepared Comprehensive Plan. Please refer to the prospectus. 6. Outside Assistance List amounts and sources of outside assistance. None 7. Special Fund Requests If the community wishes to appiy for a portion of the Special Fund: (1 ) describe the existing or proposed metropolitan feature or activity that exists within or new your community that increases the total cost to the community of preparing or updating its Comprehensive plan relative to other communities; (2) document as best as possible how the feature or activity relates to the funding criteria (V C3 of the Guidelines) and how it increases your cost; and (3) state the amount requested and indicate where this amount- is reflected in the work program major task cost estimates. 8. Grant Amount(s) Requested: a. Communi Comprehensive Planning Fund entitiament S 1.089.00 ty — — —' -- '- /may 7�r' -�J'i' i:'•'?2�f7 �C1i�o -�.f- .7 �(, �- ..___ b. Inventory Activity Fund entitlement $ !) C. Special Planning Problems Funds requested S n TOTAL. S *Total grant amount requested; plus assistance from the counties out of the County Assistance to Freestanding Crowtn Carrtem.e Fund or Inventory Activities Fund, may not exceed 75% of thetotai cost of the work program, or the total cost,* communizW1 i • r �� i 1 . CITY OF RIC11FIEID • 2. Se•Ner Policy 3. Parks and C «a.n SOace 10,944 I D r Ill, tmplenen ation Pro-,ram • A. invent=3 736' p 'rics ni rect2 S. Oeveiopmert cf Programs or Czsi�tior.:: t. official Controls 2,736 Planning Directcr 2. Capital improvernrnt 10 , g 4 4 ! Comp Planner 3. Housing implementation 3,736 IP1 nninc Dire IV. Prtpartticn and Adoption of _ City Manager & Offic:alCcntrols 2,736 City Council Pouf Cost of work Program * $114,960-00 outside Assistance �') 0 I Ccst to Community $114,960.00 I iretudc; Z11 costs defined a: ire,uded in : ~z total cost of trc v:ork proor3m. 7 , •t ei rr or a ^^_rc (:) re:t:cnsl!;le for :`e p ^.rformarc_ of t`e ma;or t tics of the work prceram. If indefinite of pravi;:z N-cur o.st eswration and indicate tt::t it is tcn:3ti:?.I i �} ^ "r crr•:: -.:n• .s : a - e;:; b:r fcr Ir•.a *'pry 1�:ivit`! G'3nt en:iaemants. sczeify f (S) the eli5iole Dr, :iv::i•a I t0 he cn:r oen :tlncludcs orl�- mar.Ciatovv aCt1Vl'�1�`S. f CITY OF RICHFIELD AMENDED APPENDIX B FUNDED PORTION OF THE WORK PROGRAM List below the.work program major task(s) which will be funded by the total grant award of $11,351 If only a portion of a major task is to be funded, list the specific activity(ies) and cost(s). Major Task (s) or Activities to be Funded Cost I. Land Use Plan: A. Inventory $ 2,000.00 B.1. Land Use 1,100.00 B.3. Housing 1,000.00 B.4. Airport- related 1,000.00 II. Facilities Plan: A. Inventory 2,000.00 B.1. Transportation 2,000.00 B.3. Parks & Open Space 1,000.00 II. Implimentation: B.1. Official Controls 500.00 B.2. Capital Improvements 400.00 B.3. Housing Implimentation 400.00 Total Cost of Funded Tasks or Activities $! Less Other -0- Financial Assistance Remaining Cost Funded by Local $ 11,400.00 Planning Assistance Grant *Must be equal to or greater than the total grant award. Estimated completion date of the above major tasks and activities January,' 1980 Council Letter No. 51. -2- February '26,. 1979 Redevelopment Proposal The preliminary proposal which was approved by the HRA, planning commission, and city council provides for construction of a 74,217 square foot building which is to be leased for 75 years to K- Marta Inca The building will be brick with the major entrance facing West 65th Street. The building will be serviced from 66th Street. The loading areas are to be com- pletely enclosed, as is the trash compactor area and utility area. The.garden slop, auto. center and the loading,area are screened from 66th Street by;the;Lyndale Avenue pedestrian plaza, low concrete landscape walls and landscaping. The site is drained to the 65th Street storm.sewer.. Sanitary sewer iss' provided in 65th Streetand water has been provided from 66th Street.. Wall and canopy signing are attached to'the..building., PY g _ g ., The parking ratio will be 54 parking spaces per 1000 square I foot of GFA. The floor area.ratio.will::be thirty percent. A fort percent y floor p o r ar ea ratio is allowed - in,this zoning district. The building is set back 22 feet from the 66th Street right- of -way,, 53 feet, from Lyndale Avenue right-of-way, 310- feet from the 65th.Street,right-of-way, and is immediately contingent to the Northwestern Bell property.. The plan conforms with both the comprehensive plan and the 'L /H /N redevelopment plan. Zoning Ordinance Requirements This final development 'plan is governed by city zoning ordinances (Section 3.34A). The special use permit is the legal instrument for approving the final development plan'. The final plat is a requirement of:the - zoning ordinance and i governed by the city's subdivision ordinance, Section 3.-54. The off- street parking contract is also controlled by ordinance. The preliminary PUD plan has received previous i approval from the city council. The purpose of the final development plan is to create the zoning standards which control thi particular development. The final.development plan which is bafore the city council as this time will establish the zoning standards. in this P -C2 zoning district.` These standards incl de all of the following parts of the final development plan: 1: Site plan 2. Grading plan - 3. Landscaping plan 4. Electrical site plan 5. Elevations and signs 6. Utilities plan Although the standards established by this plan are more stringent than would normally be required, the process allowed more design flexibility to fit the building to. the ite. Counc Nai 5:1: -4 -" February 26_,; 1979 il` Letter Final Plat The plat known as,Heyman's Addition was a portion of "JN - Hawsers Second Addition and will.be used for the ,X develop ment. The staff has reviewed the proposed final plat and found it to be in proper" form, in compliance with the city's s ub division regulations and consistent with the preliminary plat previously approved :by the city council. Off - Street.' Parking. Contract ment P lan conforms With a single exceptionrl the final development to the city's parking lot design, standards she design exception is that the drying' aisles immediately adjacent to the parking . stalls are <narrower'than normal. However, BRW traffic engineers have reviewed this design And determined that the deviation could be corrected with aisle identification islands, and flagging. The developer has provided both aisle identification islands and winter. flagging. The parking lot trees also help' delineate parking areas, and will facilitate orderly.parking. Staff Recommendations It is recommended that the city council take the following actions: 1. 'Approve the final development plan 2. Approve issuance of the special use permit 3. Adopt -the resolution approving the final plat 4. Approve execution of the off- street parking contract. Respectfully submitted, o c L. Wilde Acting. City Manage JLW /eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director Public Works Director' Q�H'TeCT P S+ RICHARD L. BOWEN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 13124 SHAKER SQUARE, CLEVELAND, OHIO 44120 • 216/491- 9300 z a ` FEBRUARY 5, 1979 `SAS ENG CITY OF RICHFIELD 6700 PORTLAND AVENUE C; RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423 ATTENTION: RICHARD C. KRIER, AICP PLANNING AND. DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR RE: K- MART 47189 SWC LYNDALE AVENUE AND 65TH STREET RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RLB #01505KM DEAR MR. KRIER' PER OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION OF THIS DATE, I AM SUBMITTING HEREWITH THIRTEEN 82tT.X 11" REDUCTIONS OF'THE FOLLOWING DRAWINGS: C -1, SITE PLAN; C -2, GRADING PLAN; L -1, LANDSCAPING PLAN; 'E -1, ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN; A -4, ELEVATIONS AND SIGN DRAWINGS SN -104, SN -117 AND SN -112. SUBJECT DRAWINGS INDICATE THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS PREPARED BY OUR OFFICE AND ARE TO BE UTILIZED IN YOUR SUBMISSION TO THE COUNCIL ON THE AGENDA OF FEBRUARY 12, 1979. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE NOTED PARCEL HAS BEEN REZONED TO PC -2. PLEASE ADVISE IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED BY YOUR OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS, I RICH RD L. BOWEN AND ASSOCIATES INC. GE J. MO RO EJM /DAP ENCLOSURES CC: ARTHUR HEYMAN JAMES B. JACOBSON OFFICES IN: FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 305/772 - 4801,1 PARIS, FRANCE 553 • 97 • 89 • CLEVELAND, OHIO 216/491 -9300 r� 3$ € .7 0 R yS t s �_ 4C. \ 1 n i i. I I I • I 7 d S HT3:�� - u S .o! ..#i[[s 3S3 _ t f, r i 3 r �I ° Hi! sI El \ Z � (; a n i a a Sao aY i ff z ' k 0 li NNiw '0'131dH 3llvc 'S H.LS9 I'll o tea®! s 1{j ih l \h\t%t�1�'�� \� 5 � o ► �9pti off;: �� � �p ice,._._._ ►l � _ a� w: J � u. Z (D :i Q 0 N Q C -. 04 PSzFi a S Z 0 z So a a; 4 nit li NNiw '0'131dH 3llvc 'S H.LS9 I'll o tea®! s 1{j ih l \h\t%t�1�'�� \� 5 � o ► �9pti off;: �� � �p ice,._._._ ►l � _ a� w: J � u. Z (D :i Q 0 N Q C -. y� ,�i 8Sg9E �i.t - �� C d d Ir:• rF J k �9lda has` � � it us, VP �r J EzW£. 0q I \ \ I I I I�IIIi1111111111111111II1II111111111I11I1 y�y11= pit 3 ill I II NNIVU 'Q —lt-JIdH7W r4 B- ,VONA'1 V 9 H1S9 C33S C:! rat U ul ELL o •pool 0 ©a 1 u ®VIII N En dHIM E8 _ I Ull WIC' e �i o �n n o� Fe 6� U on 0 i © := 1� � I,e■I i o �l IL I I�IIIi1111111111111111II1II111111111I11I1 y�y11= pit 3 ill I II NNIVU 'Q —lt-JIdH7W r4 B- ,VONA'1 V 9 H1S9 C33S C:! rat U ul ELL o •pool 0 ©a 1 u ®VIII N En dHIM E8 _ I Ull WIC' e �i o �n n o� Fe 6� U on 0 i © := 1� IL y�y11= pit 3 ill I II NNIVU 'Q —lt-JIdH7W r4 B- ,VONA'1 V 9 H1S9 C33S C:! rat U ul ELL o •pool 0 ©a 1 u ®VIII N En dHIM E8 _ I Ull WIC' e �i o �n n o� Fe 6� U on 0 i © := 1� IL � � •: � w ^p'[ •� :'a sE9 : � I sl'sa . • .#a -+ a 50 t b w• a J J Q � I Q K'" �_'a lJ fl IL 0.1 n _ Ri Ix �E O— !I' l t¢�smi -. M. a fII i q!° It tt .� W sy �a yJ d Z u Na > S_ n W / H it q. 13; p naI Td2 its 1, a L (r r ( 1 � S y Oar DAN .r I . o r-I 4 I� I Y I I yi h JJ YO I I V Z Qi R K Oo � I I ii AI U I I Z c r� I• J i d JI t Off tp i r ly I• IA ° o=; N n f I � O w s of T� II N fil I� II i I F + ol I o o ^ o 11 ol "ol N z° X i W J R! r ' ° � o sn I J ° ~ J S -o W u u u z vI i i -O V a, i Wu o N" we 's is Z6 03 0 N t..; «s e LU r- i _YI J U X —�,- -gym i • 4 � �— I---� c e o� LLI LL s ;I p AN °I h I a: II Rol � ,, of r ra IQ s 5 I v, Z O V 3. //, soeoos I e`'l. I bZibBZ 1 'jl �- o rI q I L I I cri av W ; - as 44 Q o -� Ik I _ 09l•1 Al l/ P-10 f10�. o r NO /1 /OOY YNiV -Jed "I So -'Z M. /Z.S400N Jt�ei bQ �v� - rtr m �' • oO'CP ; obi. � 0 ^'fF _ - ` s�j,4'Q �1 Ile, r KNOW ALL PERSONS BY IHES£. PRESENTS: That Richfield Hcusing,'and Redevelopment Au:hori.ty, a publtcr • - _ Corporation, owner, Of the .following described property situated in the County of Hennepin and State Hof Minnesota, to wit: All of Lo is 1 through 4 inclusive Block 3 and the west 10.00 feet of Lots S through 8, inclusive, Block 3; and all of Lots l through 10 ' inclusive, Block 4; and that part of _ • Grand Avenue which attached to Lots 1 through S; i nclusive, vacated Block 3 and Lots 1through 8 inclu sive. Block 4, All in *J. N. HAUSER'S SECt1N0 .ADDITIbNv, according to the recorded plat thereof, on file of of I record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. have caused the same to be surveyed andplatted -as HEYMAN ADDITION, . and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the avenue, - thestreets, and the park as shorn on the plat. In witness whereof said Richfield Housing and.Redevelopment Authority, a public Corporation, has - caused these presents to be signed by its proper and its corporate seat to be affixed this day of t9 SIGNED:. RICHFIELD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY apublic Corporation Chairman Executive Director _ STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument .:was acknowledged before . me this day of _ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 19_ by Chairman, and Executive Director of Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a public corporation; on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 1, James E. Boerhave, hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as HEYMAN ADDITION, that this plat is a correct representation of said survey; 'That at distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments are correctly placed in the ground as shown on the plat; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no wet lands to be .designated on the plat. James E. Boerhave, Land Surveyor - Minnesota Registration Number 7095 STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before mi this day of COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 19_, by James Fi Boerhave, Land Surveyor. Notary Public County, Minnesota .My Commission Expires ';RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA This plat, HEYMAN ADDITION, was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 19_ i s CITY COUNCIL OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA,, - I SIGNED: SIGNED: .Mayor Manager FINANCE DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that there are no delinquent taxes for all yearC prior to for land described on this plat. Dated this day of 19 Vernon T. Hoppe, Director ey:_ Tax Clerk SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter gl o, Minnesota Laws 1969, . this plat has been approved this day of Alver R. Freeman, Hennepin County. Surveyor, by Y. REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota's 1 hereby-certify that the within plat of HEY%M ADDITION was filed in this office this day of 19 at o'clock .M. Wayne A. Johnson, Registrar of Titles. - RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT OF HEYMAN ADDITION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota must approve all plats and subdivisions of land in the City of Richfield, Minnesota by resolution pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 462 358, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota has found that the proposed plat of Heyman Addition is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the city. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota that the proposed plat entitled "Heyman • Addition" is approved and the appropriate city officers are directed to take the necessary steps to evidence this approval. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of February, 1979. Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk Exc RICHFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES _. . May 24, 1977 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Lindgren, Commissioners Lien, Anderson, Ertman, Ahlquist, Helmberger, Ulrich, Ketcham. Council Liaison Ludeman. MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Susag.' STAFF PRESENT:. Richard Krier, Planning Director; Mark Hendrickson, Associate Planner; Judy Kunz, Secretary. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M /Ulrich, S /Ahlquist to approve the minutes of April 26, 1977 regu- lar Planning Commission meeting. .Motion carried. ITEM #3, CASE NO. 77 -RZ -3, 77- PUD -2, REZONING & PUD - K -MART The Planning Director presented the staff report to the Planning • Commission including coverage of the following topics: traffic flow, drainage and utility plans, topography of the site, lighting plan, elevations, relation to zoning ordinance, preliminary plat and the background of the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet Redevelopment project. Arthur Heyman, Financial Properties Developers, Inc., appeared before the Planning Commission. Questions from the Commission included: 1. If the special use permit is issued now, will it have to be indicated that it was necessary to The Planning Director_ Indic Y renewed. g issue the special use permit now, however, it would have':to be renewed yearly. 2. What is the color of the building exterior. It willbe a buff color of split -faced concrete. 3. How will the landscaping be maintained? The develoPer indicated that this will be the responsibility of the store manager. He also indicated that the landscaping guarantee contracts are written for two years rather than for one year to insure that the trees and shrubs will survive while they are getting established. ,All land- scaping will conform to the Urban Design Guidelines. Commissioner Anderson was excused. _a • -3- Gordon Strom, 6617 Humboldt Avenue South, property owner within the L /H /N, appeared before the Planning Commission. He suggested that the Planning Commission defer action on this proposal until further information is received and more property owners in the area are notified. He said that he had been invited to only one other - meet- ing regarding the project which was about one year ago. Bernard J. Meyer, 6645 Grand Avenue South, appeared before the Plan- ning Commission raising several questions. Included were: 1. Who pays the cost of the new storm sewer in 65th Street? The Planning Director indicated that part of the public.improvements will be paid by the property owners in the L /H /N project area., The K -Mart developer will be paying $97,000 in special assessments. 2. Upon completion when do the taxes become payable? The first year taxes will be partial taxes since.there is no tax on the build- ing until it is completed. The following year and from then on, full taxes will be paid. 3. What is the current assessed value of the site and assessed value with K -Mart? $400,000 is the approximate current assessed value, the approximately K -Mart project assessed value will be over $1 million. 4. When will the .K-Mart open for business? Depending on the closing date, the proposed store will open either'the second quarter of 1979 or the fourth quarter of 1979. 5. To what extent will the preliminary plat be changed? The Planning Director indicated that the changes to be made are of technical nature, to include indicating corner angles, to show adjoining subdivisions. 6. How much screening will be done on 66th Street? The.Planning Director and developer reviewed the enclosed loading area, enclosed compactor pad and enclosed utility vault and proposed screening on 66th Street. 7. What about night deliveries? The developer indicated that there are none anticipated because there is no grocery department. Mr. Meyer suggested that the Planning Commission take under serious advisement that residents beyond the required 350 feet of the project be notified and to have another hearing. Chairman Lindgren clarified the rezoning requirements for notification to property owners within 350 feet of the site. Carl McBride, Chairman of the Commercial Improvement Committee, appeared before the Planning Commission and read a letter from George Evans, President of the Chamber of Commerce supporting the Lyndale /Hub / Nicollet project and the K =Mart PUD. Chairman Lindgren entered for the record a letter from the Sibley Company in support of.the proposed K -Mart store in the L /H /N. R Roger Yost, 6614 Pleasant Avenue South, appeared before the Commission. He told the Commission that about a year ago he purchased the house at the above address and had never been told of the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet project. He expressed concern that the commercial development would someday spread to include his home. The Planning Director explained' that at the present time there were no plans for inclusion of the area where his home is located and that with the planned development for this area, it would be an asset to his home rather than for the commer cial area to remain as it is now. The Planning Director also stated that the purpose of the L /H /N was to avoid creeping commercialism. M /Ertman; S /Ketcham to close the hearing. Motion carried. Commissioner Ulrich then made a statement to the residents that came to the meeting. She said she fully understands what it is like to live next to a business district, especially a declining district, and that she is entirely in favor of the L /H /N project and hopes that when that particular project is completed that other commercial areas in Richfield can be redeveloped. M /Ulrich, S /Lien to recommend to the City Council a zoning district change from general commercial to planned general commercial for this site. Motion carried 7 -0. • M /Ertman, S /Ahlquist preliminary PUD plan to recommend to the City Council approval of the as presented for this site. Motion carried 7 -0. M /Lien, S /Helmberger to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat for the K -Mart site. Motion carried 7 -0. M /Ertman, S /Lien to recommend to the City Council approval of the special use permit in that the conditions for a special use permit are satisfied. Motion carried 7 -0. Commissioner Ketcham stated that he wants to see some terminology adopted relating to the visual Screening of parking lots from public view espec- ially as it affects residents and entrances to Richfiel& and to request the City Council to look at the problem. The Planning Director suggested putting this topic on a future agenda for policy discussion. M /Ketcham, S /Ulrich that visual screening of parking lots be adopted as a part-of the Urban Design plan to protect residents and to enhance the visual image of Richfield in new or redeveloped areas or'sites. The Commission then discussed the intent of the motion. Councilman Ludeman stated that it is the intent of the city that sites that have been previously. developed be landscaped. He expressed dislike of fences, but felt that the L /H /N project had given considerable atten- -5 tion to screening. He also felt that the cost to the businesses should also be considered. He saw no problem with the motion. M /Ertman, S /Lien to table this discuss, after proper research, until the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Motion .failed 3 -5 with Commissioners-Anderson, Lindgren, Helmberger, Ulrich and Ketcham voting no. M /Lien, S /Helmberger to call for the question. Motion carried. Original motion carried 6-2 with Commissioners Lien and Ahlquist voting no. ITEM #4, CASE NOS. 77 -RZ -2, 77 -SP -5, 77 -V -2, REZONING, SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE, SUPER AMERICA, STATION, 826 W 66TH ST Mark Hendrickson presented the staff report to the Planning Commis- sion. Mr. John Hogenson, applicant, appeared before the Commission. He expressed his joy to be one of the first businesses to be improved under the guide of the Urban Design Elements utilized in the L /H /N project area. The Commission asked about the type of structure the proposed canopy was to be constructed of. Mr. Hogenson stated that they were con- sidering using a stone facade to tie in with the natural tones theme of the L /H /N. Daniel ,Hayes, 901 Rae Drive, appeared before the Commission stating he was in favor of the variance for a canopy. He said he felt that Super America ran a good business.. John A.. Malinski, 917 West 66th Street, appeared before the Commission in opposition to the rezoning. He felt C -2 zoning would allow too heavy commercial uses in that area. He complained that debri from the businesses was blowing into his yard. He also complained that the condensors on the south side of the building were excessively noisy, particularly at night during the summer months. James J. Keegan, 911 West 66th Street, appeared before the Commission. He expressed his satisfaction with the L /H /N project. He also stated that it is a nuisance to live across the street from an all night service station and that there has been more debri blowing into his yard since the station became a self- service station. M /Anderson, S /Lien to close the hearing. Motion carried. Council Meeting Minutes CITY OF RICHFIELD Regular Meeting ` June 13, 1977 7. Proposal for General Commerciai Pianned Unit Development - Promotional Department Store Site - Lyndale /HublNicollet Redevelopment Project Unit The city planning director presented information on the proposed K -Mart project concerning which the HRA and city council have previously held hearings and for which the city has entered into a redevelopment contract. He stated that Financial Properties Developers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, and the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority have requested the following actions of the city council: 1. Zoning district change from general commercial to planned general commercial ` 2. Approval of the preliminary PUD plan 3. Approval of a special use permit 4. Approval of a preliminary plat Mr. Hyman Edelman, 1800 Nicollet Plaza, spoke in opposition to rezoning for re- • development and alleged that there was inadequate evidence of blight to support public acquisition of property for this project. Mr. Gordon Strom, 6617 Humboldt Avenue, spoke in opposition to the proposed special assessment for public improvements. Motion by Jacobsen, seconded by Luettinger to close the hearing. All ayes — Carried. Bill No. 1977 -15, "An Amendment to Appendix C of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota ", describing the boundaries of the zoning districts enumerated in Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.28, Subdivision 2 of said code, was read and reviewed by city attorney, Clayton LeFevere, the same being on file in the office of the city clerk. (C -8798) Motion by Jacobsen, seconded by Luettinger that this constitute aifirst reading of Bill No. 1977 -15; that it be published in the official newspaper and that the ' second reading of this ordinance amendment be scheduled for July 11, 1977. Poll of votes: Ayes Anderson, Jacobsen, Ludeman, Luettinger, Law. Nayes - None. Carried. Council Meeting Minutes -6- June 13, 1977 Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger to approve the preliminary plat, the preliminary PUD plan and the special use permit with stipulations as listed in Council Letter No. 179; with all of these actions contingent;on implementation of the rezoning in Bill No. 1977 -15. All Ayes Carried. 8. Discussion on Sheridan Park (Not on Agenda) Robert Solheim, 6425 Vincent, appeared before the council with a number of children, requesting a full time park program at Sheridan Park. He reported on a petition that had been presented to the recreation department. The city manager reviewed the history of the 1977,budget planning process and described the budget revision which would be necessary to cover a half -day summer park program at Sheridan Park should the city council decide to authorize this program. • Motion by Anderson, seconded by Jacobsen that the following resolution be adopted; that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of these minutes: RESOLUTION NO. 5727 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF APPROPRIATION FROM THE 1977 CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR SUMMER PARK PROGRAM Poll of votes: Ayes - Anderson, Jacobsen, Ludeman, Luettinger, Law. Nayes - None. Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 5727 in Resolution Book No. 40. 9. Proposed Revision in Sauna License and Masseuse Certificate Fees. The city manager and city attorney reviewed the two proposed ordinances; Bill No. 1977 -11, "An Amendment to Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.25 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield ", relating to the license fees of sauna and massage parlors, and Bill No. 1977 -12, "An Amendment to Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.26 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield ", relating to the certificate fee for the practice of massage., Council Meeting Minutes -4 July 11, 1977 t CITY OF RICHFIELD Regular Meeting July 11, 1977 PLEASANT AVENUE FROM 62ND TO 65TH STREET Poll of votes: Ayes - Anderson, Jacobsen, Ludeman, Luettinger, Law. Nayes - None. Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 5743 in Resolution Book No. 40. Council recessed at 8 :30 PM to conduct the HRA meeting and reconvened at 8:45 PM. 7. L /H /N Project Boundary Hearing The city manager advised that the Hennepin County Property Description Division • had requested the City to amend the L /H /N project area boundaries to include the total parcel of property in Richfield Lake which was purchased from the Rutman's. Inclusion of this property, which is partially located within the project boundaries, will not affect the financing of the tax increment district as the property is tax exempt and has been designated for park use. Motion by Jacobsen, seconded by Anderson to close the hearing. All ayes - Carried. Motion by Anderson, seconded by Luettinger to approve this change in the L /H /N boundaries. All ayes - Carried. 8. Second Reading of Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, -K-Mart Parcel The city planning director reviewed the rezoning request from Financial Properties Developers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, for a zoning district change from General Commercial to Planned General Commercial. Lawrence Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth, asked about assessed values before and after the rezoning; inquired about residential notification of hearings; questioned z \. U\ AI lL o ° _ SN '7* L N 33 Nil 1 to M w w 0. y Q I 0 OF W r t i= Z T oo . _ ar + r CC 1 � d CL nr 4. I , I i - 11 linii i i n i i i I I I r f , _ ' X .I o . kM NlJ3i- 111108 ONd C131yH1LlON fly p F I 3 24 YgS \i7 Y RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT OF WOODLAKE INVESTMENT ADDITION ■ kA WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota must approve all plats and subdivisions of land in the city of Richfield, Minnesota by resolution pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 462.358, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota has found that the proposed plat of Woodlake Investment Addition is in compliance with the subdivision regulations of the city. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota that the proposed plat entitled "Woodlake Investment Addition" is approved and the appropriate city officers are directed to take the necessary steps to evidence this approval. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of February, 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk Loren L. Law, Mayor .��EMERSON AYE � \\ � \\ \ ail �•. \ T--T, F I I�IIJrll_-rt ! LL _I II V DUPONT. YE 17 LJ /. 1 ni COLFAX AVE •.� .,y G .AIL �`„ BRYANT AVE. 7777, rri -rT- ALDRICH .AVE. X. 71 T—i I P�jl T T 'i: GARFIELO AVE _Z1 I T HARRIET AVE ff Tr rr - -�_—1 in 30 CIS : LT —.�,° r GRAND AVE ��I III � I Him Vj r I I i I I I LLL I.L. Li-Lit r I PLEASANT AVE. - FT L7 1 �L PILLSBURY AVE of wxo 00 >m OO mo Z ! I I-- W�ENTWORTH AVE. Y I !( ZM Z '� 3� ' I -fir T I 11 Z m �J� yJ I I II 'M M, j BLAISDELL AVE. O r I I I `. m _ IT —� —�—� NICOLLET AVE. = i - ~ t 0 D J STEVE- AVE. -- i T� I ] ntl AVE S g LVNOALE /HUB/ NICOLLET COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT p PROGRAM RICHFIELD, MN W_ 1 40 I * WOODLAKE IN KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That tine City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipal corooration, owner of trza following described land situated in the County of iennepin and State of Minnesota, to wit: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1131, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, except that part thereof lying Northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly line of said Tract C, distant 40.25 feet Southeasterly from the most_ Westerly corner of said Tract C; thence northeasterly 146.58 feet parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract C thence Northeasterly 103.08 feet, parallel with the Southeasterly line of said Tract C, to the Northeasterly line of said Tract C, and there terminating. and that Woodlake Veterinary Hospital, P.A., a Minnesota professional corporation, owner of the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of iinnesota, to wit: The Northwesterly 36.00 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1131, Files of Registrar of Titles, County, of Hennepin, as measured along the Westerly line of said Tract A. and that Robert G. Jahn and Katherine Jahn, husband and wife, owners of the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, to wit: The Southeasterly 26.00 feet of the Northwesterly 62.00 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1131, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin as measured along the Westerly line of said Tract A. and That part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey. No. 1131, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, lying Southeasterly of a line 62.00 feet Southeasterly and parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract A, as measured along the Westerly line of said Tract A. and That part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1131, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, lying Northwesterly of the following described line`. Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly line of said Tract C, distant 40.25 feet Southeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Tract C; thence Northeasterly 146.58 feet parallel with the Northwesterly line of said Tract C; thence Northeasterly 103.08 feet, parallel with the Southeasterly line of said Tract C, to the Northeasterly line of said Tract C, and there terminating. have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as WOODLAKE INVESTMENT ADDITION, and do hereby donate and �=H to to the public for public use forever the street, as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipal corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers and its corporate seal to be affixed this day of , i9 _ and said Woodlake Veterinary Hospital, P.A., a Minnesota professional corporation, has caused these presents tt be signed by its proper officers this _ _ day of 19 _ _, and Robert G. Jahn and Katherine Jahn, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals this day of 19 The City of Richfield Woodlake Veterinary Hospital, P.A. A Minnesota Municipal Corporation A Minnesota Professional Corporation SIGNED: SIGNED: Mayor President and Secretary Manager SIGNED: SIGNED: ______ Robert G. Jahn _ Katherine Jahn STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 19 by Mayor, and _ , Manager, of -he City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf -of the corporation. - - -- - -- --- -- -- -- Notary Public County, Minnesota Coy Commission Expires _____________ STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 19 _ _ b y President and Secretary of Woodl ke- "e—ter nary rlospital, P. A:, afinnesota Professional corporation, on behalf of the corporation. — -- - -- -- - - -- -_ Notary Public - County, Minnesota My _Commission s R T. DOC. NO. - r L STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing , instrument was acknowledged before me this day of __.___- _-- ___- 9 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 19 by Robert G. Jahn and t,atnerine Jahn, husband and wife. Notary Public - County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, James E. Boerhave, hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as 'd00DLAKE INVESTMENT ADDITION, that this plat is a correct reor+esentation of said survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments are correctly placed in the ground as shown on the plat; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; that there are no wetlands to be designated on the plat. James E. [ 3oerhave, R.L.S. Minnesota Registration Number 7095 STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ...... day of COUNTY OF HENNEPIN 19 by James E. Boerhave, "and Surveyor. Notary Public - -- -- - - - ------------------------ County, Minnesota -- -- - - - --- - - My Commission E:<oires ___.______ 1 RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA _ This plat, WOODLAKE INVESTMENT ADDITION, was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this _ —_ day of _. > 19 CITY COUNCIL OF RICHFIELC; MINNESOTA SIGNED: 1 SIGNED: - - -- - -- — -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- Mayor -- — — Manager FINANCE DIVISION, Hennepin County; Minnesota I hereby certify that there are no delinquent taxes for all years prior to for land described on this plat. Dated this -- day of _ -- - - - - -- —' 19 - -- Vernon T. Hoppe, Director By: Tax: Clerk SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Chapter 810, Minnesota Laws 1969, this plat has been approved this day ofl 19 Alver R. Freeman, Hennepin County Surveyor By: -__- _ REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of WOODLAKE INVESTMENT ADDITION was filed in this office this ........ day of 19 at o'clock - H, By: Deputy Wayne A. Johnson, Registrar of Titles DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIQNS a AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION made this day of 1979, by Robert G. Jahn and Woodiake Veterinary Hospital, P.A., a Minnesota professional corporation, hereinafter called the Developer, and individually referred to by their respective names or "owner. WITNESSETH, ThAT: WHEREAS, the.Developer..is the owner of real property described in Article I attached hereto and made.a part hereof and desires to create_thereon a three unit shopping center and WHEREAS,._the.Developer' desires to _provide for the preservation of the amenities:and..values in said center in a uniform and cQordinated;.:manner as provided in these covenants, restrictions, • easements,,,charges..and liens as hereinafter.set forth, each and all of which island are,.for the benefit of said property and each owner thereof; NOW,..THEREFORE,.the Developer hereby declares that the real property described in Article I is, and shall be held, transferred, .`sold,_ conveyed and occupied, subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens hereinafter set forth and ,to any amendments hereto or thereto, (all hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Covenants and Restrictions"). ARTICLE I LEGAL DESCRIP`I'IOiI The legal description of the Parcel on which the buildings and improvements are located is contained on Exhibit A attached hereto 01 and made a part hereof; ARTICLE II PARKING RIGI3TS Section 1. General Parking Areas. The parking spaces on the front side of the building may be used by the owner of any of the lots described in Article I and by any tenants, business invitees or licensees of the aforesaid owners, but not by any employees of the owners or any tenants. y . Section 2. Limited Parking Areas The - parking 'spaces behind the building may be used only by the respective owners and their employees and each owner may use only the spaces that are located on his respective property, ARTICLE III: EXTERIOR MAINTENANCE The-owners in coerlination with one arother �,_:s>'S:u shall paint and maintain the exterior wall surfaces, inc= ludingsteps and exterior windows and doors, and shall also maintain and repair the landscaping, parking lot, foundation walls and footings, and the roof, including gutters, downspouts and chimneys,.of each unit on a lot. All such painting, repair and maintenance shall:be done as and when, and to the extent that the majority o.f,all owners deem it • necessary or desirable. ARTICLE IV COVENANTS FOR INSURANCE Section 1. Maintenance of Insurance. Each owner shall obtain and maintain in force at all times, a policy of fire, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief insurance, with all risk endorsement, for at least the full insurable replacement cost of all his buildings and improvements located upon the property, with at least an eighty percent (80 %) co- insurance clause, and with a deductible amount to be determined by all owners, and issued by a reputable insurance company or companies authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. The policy or policies also.shall provide a standard mortgage clause in favor of each -first mortgage of a Lot, and provide that such policies cannot be cancelled without at least ten (10) days' prior written notice to the other-owners and each first mortgagee. Such insurance shall be payable to the owner and to each such first mortgagee, as their interests may appear, to be held and used pursuant to the provisions of this Article IV. Each owner shall also obtain and maintain, as a part of the above insurance policy, or by a separate policy with a reputable insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, public -2- 1i•ab4 1 y isuran c C -or one 1"e', ke:Li of tit owners, insuring against • loss due to bodily injury and property damage occurring in, on or about the property and commercial units. Such insurance shall be in such amounts as all owners from time to time shall determine. Each mortgagee shall not, and shall be deemed to have waived any right to, apply any such insurance proceeds to the debt secured by its mortgage except pursuant to the provisions of this Article IV. Section 2. Application of Insurance Proceeds. To the extent .there are insurance proceeds payable due to any.damage or destruction- and under policies maintained by the Association pursuant to Section l of this Article IV, such proceeds shall be applied and administered as follows: a. All insurance proceeds paid to the owners and mortgagee or mortgages shall be deposited in escrow with a title insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota • and 'selected by the - Association for payment and distribution as hereinafter.provided. b. In the event of an insured loss to a commercial unit or to any improvement upon the property, the owner, within thirty (30) days after the insurance proceeds are deposited with a title insurance company in accordance with _paragraph a. above, shall enter into a firm contract with a qualified builder providing, for the restoration of the damaged or destroyed property, to substantially the same condition and in the same .general architectural style and configuration as existed immediately prior to the insured loss; provided, however, that no contract shall be entered into by the owner, for an amount in excess of the insurance proceeds then held by the title insurance company, until additional funds sufficient to cover all construction costs are determined by the title insurance company, are deposited by the owner of the damaged or destroyed commercial unit. Said restoration shall be commenced and completed with due diligence and in no event shall said contract provide for a completion date later than 180 days after execution of said contract. The mortgagees of record of the commercial unit affected shall have the right, but not the obligation, to deposit such additional funds in excess of insurance proceeds as may be required to permit restoration as herein provided. C. Disbursement of funds on deposit pursuant to paragraph a. above, for contracts for restoration entered into under paragraph b. above, shall be made by the title insurance company selected as hereinabove provided, subject to the following: (1) Article IV, Section 1 hereof shall apply to all such restoration. (2) Receipt by the title insurance company of a written consent of the first mortgagee of record of the damaged or destroyed property, or of a person duly appointed by such mortgagee (3) Receipt by the title insurance company of such sworn construction statements, lists of subcontractors, lien waivers and receipts as it shall determine to be appropriate. Disbursements may be by periodic or progress payments as the title insurance company shall determine, and the title insurance company may make such inspections and withhold such payments as it deems necessary to insure completion in compliance with the provisions hereof. The title insurance company shall be entitled to charge a reasonable fee for the services rendered by the title insurance company, and such fee shall be paid from the funds held by the title insurance compaz for paymcrt pursualtt hers too (4) Receipt by the title insurance company of.a written consent of the Association to said payment or payments. d. In the event that a contract is, for any reason; not entered into pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs b and c above, within one hundred eighty (180) days after deposit of insurance proceeds with the title insurance company in accordance with i paragraph a'of this Section, 2, said title insurance company shall`dsburse said proceeds to,each mortgagee of record of the damaged or destroyed commercial unit as their interests may appear, to retire the indebtedness secured by said mortgages, and disburse the remaining deposits, if any, to the • owner, as his interests may appear. Section 3. Waiver of Subrogation. To the extent permitted by the policy or policies from time to time obtained and maintained by the owners pursuant to this Article IV,.and to the extent of the net insurance proceeds recovered under such policies, each owner does hereby release all. other owners, and in every case their respective employees, guests, tenants, officers,_agents, and invitees, from all claims for injury, damage or destruction if such injury, damage or destruction results from one or more of the perils covered by the insurance obtained and maintained by the owners pursuant to this l Article IV; however, this waiver shall not apply to damage due to vandalism or malicious mischief and shall apply only during such time as the applicable policy or policies obtained or maintained by the owners pursuant to this Article IV shall contain a clause or endorsement to the effect that any such release shall not adversely affect or impair said policy or policies or prejudice the right of any insured to recover thereunder, and each owner agrees that the I insurance policy or policies to be obtained and maintained by them I pursuant to this Article IV shall contain such a clause or endorsement, if available at a reasonable cost. Net insurance proceeds shall mean the gross insurance proceeds paid less the cost of obtaining such proceeds, ARTICLE V PARTY WALLS Section 1. Creation of Easement for Party Wall. Each wall which is part of the original construction of any commercial unit and which is used as a wall in connection with the original construction of any other commercial unit, shall be a party wall. Ail Sots are heresy made subject to, and are together w.th,'an easement for.party,:wall purposes, to the extent that any party walls are located thereon, for the benefit of each such lot and any adjoining lot upon which- is_;located a commercial unit which uses v the party wall, which :easements shall continue for so long as such encroachment,.as the same may be repaired or reconstructed, exists. Section 2. Share of Repair and Maintenance. The cost of reasonable repair and maintenance-of a.party wall shall be paid by • the owners who are using the wall at the time of completion of such repair and maintenance in.proportion to such use. Section 3. _ Destruction or Damage. If a party wall is destroyed or damaged by any cause, any owner who has used the wall may restore it, and if any other owners thereafter make, use of the wall they shall contribute to the.cost.of restoration in proportion to such use without prejudice, however, to the right of any owner to recover a large contribution from.any other owners for negligent or willful acts or omissions. Section 4. Weatherproofing. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article, any owner, who, by his negligent or willful act, causes the party wall to be exposed to the elements shall bear the whole cost of furnishing the necessary protection against such elements. Section 5. Lien Rights. Any owner entitled to contribution for repair, maintenance, restoration or protection of a party wall shall have a lien on all lots benefited by such repair, maintenance, restoration or protection in an amount determined by arbitration pursuant to Section 6 of this Article, and upon docketing of judgment pursuant to the arbitrator's decision, the judgment may be foreclosed in the same manner as provided in Chapter 514, Minnesota Statutes, 1971,: as the same may be amended. -5- Section 6. Arbitration. In the event of any dispute arising concerning a party wall each owner shall choose one arbitrator and such arbitrators shall choose one or two additional arbitrators so as to have an uneven number of arbitrators and the decision of a majority of all the arbitrators shall be final and conclusive of the question involved The owners shall share equally the cost of the arbitrators. If any. owner fails to appoint '.^i arb=_t.rator within ten (10) days after appointment of the last arbitrator to be appointed, the owner or owners who have appointed their arbitrators may appoint an arbitrator for each owner who has so failed. ARTICLE VI ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL; LANDSCAPING OF PROPERTY Section 1. Review by Committee.. No building, fence, wall, sign or other structure shall be commenced, erected or maintained upon the • property described in Article I, nor shall any exterior addition, change or alteration be made: to any such building, fence, wall, sign or other structure, by any person until the plans and specifications showing the nature, kind, shape, height, materials, color and location of the same shall have been submitted to, and approved in writing as to harmony of external design and location in relation to surrounding structures and topography by all other owners or by an environmental committee appointed by all the owners. Also no improvement or structure of any kind on the property described in Article I shall be painted, decorated or colored in any way on the exterior by any person other than Developer without prior written approval of all other owners or said environmental committee. Also, no trees or k shrubs shall be planted on the property described in Article I, nor shall any sculptures or works of art or any ornamental or sign lighting be placed outside of any unit of the building, nor shall any florescent or luminous sign be placed inside the window of any commercial unit.by any person without prior written approval of all owners or said environmental committee. In the event all owners or their , designated committee fails to approve or disapprove such design and location, or such painting, decorating or coloring, or such trees, sculptures, works of art, lighting or signage within thirty (30) days l after said plans and specifications, or information on-such painting, decorating.or coloring, or such trees, sculptures,.works of art or lighting, have been submitted to it, approval will not be required, and this Article VI will be deemed to have been fully complied with. ARTICLE VII SALE: RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL The - owners shall have.,Fthe; first ontior to purchase the property of another 'owner in the event that an owner desires to seel or dispose of his property described in Article I. In such event, the owner desiring to sell or dispose of his property shall give written notice thereto to the other owners; the notice shall specify the price and the terms of such _sale. Thereafter, the owner who owned his property described in Article I the greater length of time shall have thirty (3 0) days from the date of receipt of such written notice to exercise his option to purchase the property subject to the written notice at the price and on the terms specified in the notice. If the first optionee owner does not exercise his option within the aforesaid thirty.(30) day period, the second optionee owner shall have thirty (30) days to purchase said property subject to the written notice at the price and on the terms specified in the notice. If these options are not exercised then the owner desiring to sell may dispose of his property to any purchaser, at such price and on sudh terms as was contained in his notice to the other owners; however, the transferee of said ,property shall take said property subject to all of the terms and ,conditions of this Declaration. Any sale on,terms different from the written notice is subject to the same right of first refusal by the other owners. ARTICLE VIII RULES AND REGULATIONS The majority of the owners may from time to time adopt reasonable and uniform rules and regulations governing the use of the lots and the commercial units and the personal conduct and activities of owners and their employees, tenants and guests thereon, and establish penalties for the infraction thereof. The reasonableness of any -7- c regulation may be made the subject of arbitration in a manner pre- scribed for resolution of disputes according to Article V, Section 6. ARTICLE IX. RIGHTS OF 11ORTGAGEES The holder of a first mortgage of record on any lot, shall be given written notice by the owners of all then defaults of the owner of the lot upon which such mortgage is a lien in fulfilling his obligations under this Declaration, but the defaults set out in such notice shall not be conclusive on the other owners and the other owners shall have the right to.enforce all claims against such owner for all defaults of such owner whether or not set out in said notice. ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Duration. The Covenants and Restrictions shall run with the properties Wand shall inure to the benefit of and be • enforceable.by any owner, respective representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a period fo thirty (30) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after, which time the Covenants and Restrictiona shall automatically be renewed for successive periods of ten (10) years or they may be renewed for longer or shorter periods of,time by a recorded statement of all owners setting forth the period of such renewal, and containing a statement that the renewal was approved pursuant to this Section 1. _Section 2. Amendments.: The Covenants and Restrictions may be amended by an instrument'signed by all the owners of lots listed in Article I and by a majority of all institutional lenders holding first mortgages of record. For purposes hereof an institutional lender shall be any state or national bank, federal savings and loan association, or insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota, or the Small Business Administration, holding a first mortgage of record on any lot. Such amendment shall be effective upon the recording thereof in the same office in which this Declaration is recorded. No amendment shall, however, permit rebuilding on any of the three lots in -a manner which permits the erection of a building solely and entirely within the boundary of any one of said three lots without first obtaining the consent of the Planning Commission and City Council or successors authority of the City of Richfield. I - - Section 3. Notices. Any notice required to be sent to any owner or mortgagee under, the provisions of this Declaration, shall be deemed to have been properly sent when mailed with postage prepaid to the last known address of such persons. Section 4. Enforcement. Enforcement of the Covenants and Restrictions shall be by a proceeding at law or in equity against any person or Per;ons violating or att`mptin S t-o viol�:tu any of them either to restrain violation or compel compliance, or to recover damages. Failure by an owner to enforce any of the Covenants and Restrictions shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. Attorneys' fees and costs of any action to restrain violation, compel compliance or recover damages as determined by the court having jurisdiction thereof., shall be assessable against and payable by any such person so restrained or compelled or required to pay damages'. Section 5 Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, phrase or sentence of this Declaration, for any reason, is held to be invalid or unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, the application of such section, subsection, clause, phrase or sentence to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it shall be held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and all provisions hereof, in all other respects, shall remain valid and enforceable Section 6. Binding Effect of Declaration. Each owner, upon becoming an owner, shall be bound by and be deemed to have agreed to, the terms and provisions of these Covenants and Restrictions. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Developer has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. ROBERT G. JAHiJ ,JOODLAKE VETERINARY HOSPITAL, P.A. By Robert Dietl, Its President Secretary -9- STATE OF •IINNESOTII ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEP'IN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1973, by Robert Dietl, of Woodlake Veterinary Hospital, P.A., a Minnesota professional corporation, on behalf of the corporation ' This instrument was drafted by: ARTHUR, CHAPiIAN ° & MICHAELSON, P.A. 505 EAST GRANT STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 • CITY'.OF RICHFIELDi, . MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager " Council Letter No. t8 _ Agenda February 26,;1979 The Honor able' Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield ` count i:l ' Members ': #. Subjects Tabulation of Bids, Approval :of Minutes and Award of Contract for Removal' of Lime; Sludge at the Water Treatment.Plant.e. On February 8, 1979,;bids were opened by the acting city manager in accordance with :previous city council authorization for the removal of lime sludge from the water treatment plant. The public works director, env ronmental health director, planning director and city clerk also represented the city at the'bid- opening.. The'.bid minutes and tabulation are attached for city council review Two bids -were received for this work. Wangerin, Inc.,of - Bloomington,.submitted a bid in the amount'of $5.14 ,per cubic yard.' This bid provides that the sludge be hauled to a disposal: site furnished by the city. The city's cost for disposal is $2.14 per cubic yard, making a total cost of $7.28 per cubi yard for this bid. The second bid was received from the firm of'P.C.I., Osseo, in the amount of $5.50 per cubic yard. This bid provides that the sludge be disposed at.the_ contractor's site. It is estimated that 91000 cubic yards of sludge must be removed, making the total approximate cost equal to 49,500. ` Our"lime sludge removal cost last year for slightly less sludge, was $47,600, or 4% less than this bid. Funds are in- eluded in the.1979 water division budget for lime sludge removal. It is the recommendation of the public works director,.in which I concur, that the city council award the contract for lime sludge removal to P. C. L in the amount of $5,.50 per cubic yard. Respectfully submitted, o e L. Wilde cting City Manager JLW/ e jL, a cc: Public Works Director Finance Director CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening February 8, 1979 Lime Sludge Removal Water Treatment Plant Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager, who announced.that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the Removal of Lime Sludge at the Water Treatment Plant as advertised in the official newspaper on January 24, 1979. Present: Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager I. Roesler, Environmental Health Director Richard Krier, Planning'Director Carl Marinics, Public Works Director Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER AND COST PER CU.YD. FOR HAULING TOTAL COST FOR HAULING TO DISPOSAL BID SECURITY TO DISPOSAL AREA: AREA: Furnished Furnished Furnished Furnished , by Bidder by City by Bidder by City Wangerin, Inc. B. B. 5% No Bid $5.14 No Bid $46,260 F P C I B. B. 5% $5.50 $4.28 $49,500 $38,520 Hayden Murphy Equipment No Bid No Bid No Bid No Bid The Acting City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulatedi and considered at the regular council meeting of February 26, 1979. I� Thomas J. Moran City Clerk C