Loading...
04-09-79 agenda12 -.7901 City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 Attention: Carl Marinics, Director of Public Works Re: City Project No. 739 K -Mart Storm Sewer Relocation (L /H /N) Honorable Mayor and City Council: Tuesday, April 3rd, at 10:00 a:m. bids were received and opened for the above referenced project, which is part of the L /H /N program. A total of eight bids were received. A detailed tabulation of the bids and unit prices is attached hereto. A summary of the bids is as follows. Bidder Bid Amount Deluxe Construction, Inc. $33,563.70 Q.R.S. Construction, Inc. $36,617.00 G. L. Contracting, Inc. $37,102.80 F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. $37,501.00 0 & P Contracting, Inc. $44,895.53 Burschville Construction, Inc. $47,721.77 New Mech. Companies $49,969.98 Progressive Contractors, Inc. $56,808.75 i The Engineer's final estimate was $39,632.00. The low bidder, Deluxe Construction, Inc., is a qualified firm with whom we have had satisfactory experience in the past. It is our recommendation the contract be awarded to that firm. Sincerely, BATHER- GROSE -WOLSF D- JARVIS - GARDNER, INC. Donald W. Rin 9 roseP E� BATHER, RINGROSE,WOLSFELD, JARVIS, GARDNER, INC 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE SE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PHONE. 812/379-7878 I CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening April 3, 1979 Storm Sewer Improvements City Project No. 739 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for Storm Sewer Improvements for City Project No. 739, as advertised in the official newspaper on March 21, and 28, 1979. Present: Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager Carl Marinics, Public Works Director Don Fondrick, Park & Recreation Director I. F. Roesler, Environmental Health Director Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: Bidder and Bid Security Total New Mech. Construction Co. B.B. 5% $49,969.98 0 & P Contracting, Inc. B.B. 5% $44,895.53 Q. R. S. Construction Inc. B.B. 5% $36,617.00 Progressive Contractors, Inc. B.B. 5% $56,808.75 G. L. Contracting, Inc. B.B. 5% $37,102.80 F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. B.B. 5% $37,501.00 DeLuxe Construction, Inc. B.B. 5% $33,563.70 Burschville Construction, Inc. B.B. 5% $47,721.77 The Acting City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the regular council meeting of April 9, 1979. Thomas J. Moran City Clerk I J ;CITY OF, RICHFIELD MINNESOTA x `M4nager h Office of City i ` Council IL er. NO. 116,' t Agender April 9:', 1979 T The, Honorable 'Mayor } and': Ntembers of the 'City Counc� l'. City of Richfield k Council Members.: r { � Subject: Appointment�of CATU A dv isory Committee •.t =. ' There: is` an item on •the April 9:, 19'79 'city council agenda providin9 . for the appointment of.a Citiz;ens..Advis ©ry`Committee on cable television. This. advisory committee would be charged ` with ', reviewxncr and; making _a recommendation to the 1c ity council r: lating 'to Aichfield's need for cable .televisionserv.ice. A r.esolutionestablishing this committee is attached. k � ': A cens:adVisor.y committee on cable television�wa appoint f ' ed by , the.:Richfield City, Council several , years ago, although this k'y e r � committee di d. riot progress• ;to the point of , ma k ., re-Ommendation television to the city council relatiri'g to the provisions of cabl`0 k{ services. A list of the members of this previous,CATV committee 3 is attached. Mr. J. Albert Oster, Ms. Shirley Tailor nd.Mr. Lee' S eum'have indicated an interest. In: being considered f r appoint- ment to the new CATV advisory committee; Applications from `other persons interested in being considered. for appointment to this comm ittee are ,attached. Respectfully submitted, r� k ce, Wilde :. Acting City Manager. 1 JLW /jeer F t ,f a i i fi t iy' r !. S c c a t CATV COMMISSION MEMBERS Appointed 1973 William Baird, 6317 Aldrich Avenue Shirley Taylor, 7215 12th Avenue Jack Linn, 7039 James Avenue L. Sveum, 6745 Portland Avenue Richard Blevins, 7232 Upton Avenue Thomas Lee, 7632 Newton Avenue J. Albert Oster, 6226 5th Avenue 9i 79 ~- APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RI V EU. ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSIO pp NAME Last ana First Middle -�-- HOME ADDRESS 7115 Chicago Ave. So., Richfield MN 55423 Street No. City ZiP Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. PHONE: Home 861 -6987 City. Zip Code Business 927 -8681 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Adv Human Rights Commission Senior Citizen & Handica Y Comm. Civil Service Aped --"` Commission Advisory Commission Advisory Board of Health -_O, ther V Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you belie municipal commission /committee and why believe qualify You for this Y you are. interested in servings Have developed training and orientation programs to insure efficiency and profitability for my employer. Analyzed Word Processing System for entire organization with recommendation for retention • on of the present . system. in Organized and coordinated Richfield campaign for County Commissioner 1978 election. Assisted in campaign for IR Governor in 1978 election. Feel a deep sense o invo vemen in a co interest in serving the needs of the people. With my background �inaplanning and organ�z�ng, o ice mgm an �b t a will be beneficial�to this committee an�'t e cQtizecano i CV�;trPKC�II�NL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: ch field . Mpm f R ublican Part Richfield Precinct 10 Alternate; Richfield Chairwoman ' for Randy Johnson, Count County Commissioner, in 1978 election; Candidate for IR Chairwoman of Senate District 37. of: Minneapolis Institute of Arts, Administrative Management Societ , y AGOG (Business Women's Group) Da to 3- '7--'72 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR _COMMISSION APP OINTME'\T' NAME �WaYJ Sc>n 4. Last = irst iii_ ule HOME ADDRESS ,0/! Str et No, City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home Business APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience % ^ihich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission /committee and why You are .nterested in serving: A ✓ ll `N Date April 3. 1979 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COPAMISSION APPOIINTME!''T NAME Bray Olin Henry Last _ -irst, iwi p ie HOME ADDRESS 6645 Portland Richfield 55423 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zia Code. " PHONE: Home 866 -3592 Business 631 -5958 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission: Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other Cable TV • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/Committee and why %-ou are .nterested in serving: Because of my background with computer systems (7 years) I know about various communications technologies. Also last year I spent several weeks looking at cable TV as a means of extending computer communications into the home. I also hage four years of management in the public sector (Hennepin County';and Minneapolis). I feel that cable TV has far greater potential than is normally realized and that with m back round I can helpp dbtermine how that potential can be used to help the CIVIC, PROFESSSIONAL AND COMMUNITY' ACTIVITIES: community. League of Women Voters Association for Computing machinery Executive Vice- President Twin Cities Chapter Data Processing management Association Prooram Committee FEB 2 1979 , ;c ;i s coy ,iiarlagei it `r� fehludl« S��ools Independent School District No. 280 70th & Harriet Avenue •Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Bruce R. Anderson Superintendent Telephone: (612) 861 -7511 January 31 1979 Mr. Wayne Burggraaff City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Dear Wayne: Pursuant to our recent conversation, our school district would be most pleased to provide a resource to the committee which the Council is considering creating regarding the cable television concept. The possible positive consequences to the school district would be substantial and thus we would be pleased to have a member on the committee if the Council so desires. • Mr. Jack Loss, is a knowledgeable individual in this area and would be my designee until July 1, 1979 if a school district representative is seen as useful Thank you. Sincerely, �UC 2 Bruce R. Anderson Superintendent' i BRA: jm Aij FEB Y 1979 "Doi ("c' ,t'al(J C "Y Manager ' RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT Ab " AND FUNCTION OF AN AD HOC CITIZEN ADVISORY' COMMITTEE ON CABLE TELEVISION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Cable Communications Board on Feb- ruary 9, 1979 approved designation of a cable television service territory which includes Richfield, and WHEREAS, designation of a cable service territory enables a community to consider the establishment of a franchise to pro- vide cable television services, and WHEREAS, rules and regulations of the Minnesota Cable Communi- cations Board require that no cable communications franchise may be awarded, without certain planning provisions, and WHEREAS, said rules require than an advisory body be estab- lished to make recommendations on cable communications to the franchising authority (i.e. the city council), and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has, from time to time, found it to be in the best interests of the community to establish advisory committees to serve in designated capacities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • of Richfield as follows: 1. There is hereby established a Citizens Advisory Committee on Cable Communications. 2. The committee shall serve in an advisory capacity to the city council. 3. The committee shall be comprised of seven to nine voting members representing a cross- section of the community, male and female, although no persons commercially involved in cable communications',activ ities or other communication media shall serve as members of the advisory body. 4. Non- voting and ex- officio members representing the city council and city staff shall also participate with and on this committee in accomplishing the assigned tasks. 5. Regular voting members shall be appointed in April, 1979, with service to begin immediately. Termina- tion of service shall occur at such time as the committee forwards a recommendation to the city council regarding the means of satisfying theicommuni- cation needs of Richfield residents. 6. The purpose of this committee shall be to review and make recommendations to the Richfield City Council regarding the provision of cable television services within Richfield This task may include, but not be limited to, the following activities: a) Review published information, including state and federal statutes, and rules and regulations, regarding cable communications b) Survey other area municipalities to determine what they are doing, or what their experience has been, with regard to cable communications; c) Assess the communication needs of Richfield residents, and make publicly available the procedures and results of such assessments; d) Make recommendations to the city council re- garding cable communication needs and desirability for Richfield. 7. Any of the following shall cause the position of a regular member to become vacated: a) Death b) Disability or failure to serve, shown by failure to attend three consecutive meetings • of the committee without prior notice or per- mission of the committee to be excused; c) Removal of legal residence from the city; d) Resignation in writing; e) Removal by the city council; f) Election or appointment to a public office. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this 9th day of April, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk LEGAL NOTICE Bill 1979 -8 i TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. 16.x. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of Richfield does ordain: Section 1. It is found and determined necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, and are.further0detailed in the City's 1979 -1984 Capital Improvement Program and are projects which the City would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2. The capital improvement and the amounts of expenditure for such improvements, which are hereby authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, Subdivision 2, of the City Charter, are as follows: General Public Buildings $150,000 Lyndale Liquor Store Improvement 80,000 Fire Truck Reserve 35,000 Total SZ65,000 Section 3. The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council resolution. Proposed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 12th day of March, 1979. All persons interested for or against this proposed ordinance amendment are notified to be present April 9, 1979 and they will be hearth. BY ORDER OF THE COUNCIL March 12, 1979 Thomas J. Moran City Clerk Publish March 21, 1979 Cbunc l Leger NO.. 1 y appointed for one, year terms bythe the city counc 1",, The-:.., charter ' f= I . RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING CITY MANAGER'S APPOINTMENT OF TWO RESIDENT MEMBERS TO BOARD OF REVIEW BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Richfield hereby approves the City Manager's appointment of Harry Tickner and Harley D. Witte as 1979 resident members to the Board of Review. BE IT. FURTHER RESOLVED, that the compensation for the two resident members of the Board of Review be set at a minimum of $25.00 per session of the Board, or $10.00 per hour per session of the Board, whichever is greater. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 9th day of April, 1979. ATTEST: ThnmaG .T _ Mnran N tv f'1 Prk Cbunct Le ter No. 113 -l-- April 9, 1979. ,4- f TYe council is also requested to, authorize the staff to acquire the easements necessary to implement the improvements. There is a separate item on the city council agenda pro Vii ding for approval of just compensation and a uthorization'to, negotiate.for the .required right -of -way parcels to` undertake asspcated' land - scaping improvements. Once, the necessary easements have been approved and acquired, bid construction documents will be prepared, and submitted to the city council for final approval. It will also be ;necessary for the State and Federal Highway Administrations t0 r,ev.iew and comment on these bid documents. it is`the recommendation of the public works rector and the planning and redevelopment director, in which I concur, that the •city council. approve the final design plan and authorize the staff to begin negotiations for the necessary easements „to undertake the L 'y n n n dale Avenue, improvement project.' Respectfully submitted, J L.. Wilde cting City Manager JLW/ e j a cc: Public Works Director Planning & Redevelopment Director t RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND AUTHORIZING THE BEGINNING OF NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS, LYNDALE AVENUE FEDERAL AID URBAN PROJECT (Between Lakeshore Drive and West 64th Street) WHEREAS, preliminary plans for improving and widening Lyndale Avenue from West 64th Street to Lakeshore Drive were approved by the city council of the City of Richfield with the approval of the Preliminary Plans for the Lyndale /Hub /Nicollet Project Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the city council and the city staff have completed the necessary preliminary project development report, location design study, and public hearing necessary to apply for Federal Aid Urban funds as administered; by the Minnesota State Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, in December of 1978, the Federal Highway Administration approved the Location and.Design Study, which identified the scope of the project, major design objectives, and construction limits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the final design and property acquisition plans necessary to make the Lyndale Avenue Federal Aid Urban Improvement from West 64th Street to Lakeshore Drive are hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Richfield. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 9th day of April, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: i Thomas J. Moran City Clerk + ti it wild be: necessary .for the :city council to: `a do pt` .a r solution re. Council Letter . Nb : 112 2 3 ty Prior` to ordering of the public. hearing, it 'will a necessary aquatie improvements at.:Norby Pond Is-estimated tc be used for ;the Thy landsc ped: elements at ,V�ilson iFond are expec"te The °revisions to `the public d rainage .system; ent :process rght`;of way and �baulevar.d.;areas "are:to. include su storm' "sewer improvements through special assessmen?t b larger? 1n1etS in the lower strut ;areas; :; "ralsln'g and increasing the ability of certain ,str.eet seg, e ts' to .safely hold excess storm water. The, cost t`o i proveMent is estimated," a $70`,000:, ifa the. city council wishes to:-proceed -with any mayor -s orm .sewer work it wild be: necessary .for the :city council to: `a do pt` .a r solution re. ceiva.ng the preliminary report and, ordering the ,pu =b]:c hearing Fn,aricrig Storm Sewer Improvements Prior` to ordering of the public. hearing, it 'will a necessary for the city council to adopt an assessment policy to, be used for ;the drainage improvements: "', The alternative ohutionsdesc ibed in this council:. letter 'heFVe, significant :.est� matod 'Cos t "s,, te.only 'feasi ble wad of .fina.ncing .such improvements is through the; pecial assess- ent :process 4 Prior:, to February, 1972, it had been. city policy o :finance storm' "sewer improvements through special assessmen?t b d- issues and special assessments levied, against private ,property. hat policy prvva deb for a. maximum ..storm sewer aassessment of.;;k t z per, square ; foot. tually all property within- th "e pity ,of. ci field has paid °.' ing f or is ;in the process ,of pay ah s maximum o er squa -re .fo ot" storm sewex assessmoh, °:for" Storm sewers and ,relat d ;a urtances. .. Fetlruary, 1,:97, the :city cpuncxl adopted r s`ne i storm water. asses3sinerrt' policy (Resolutson No 4735, .eopyatta ed) { This ` i` " 1� A r;i1 9 1`979 Cqunc�. better No. 1 4 p .. , �.- policy provides that al storm sewers and appurtanees constructed in 1974 and °future years be`fully assessed. - -This °'assessment policy is c o > licy. Whether the council wishes to retain this policy or" to. establish. some other special,assessment policy to undertake any of the ;storm water improve- menu <discussed in this letter it, will be necess4'r for the council to adopt a'resolution establishing the specific assessment policy, to "be -used for:this storm sewer improvement project.. Attached is a' resolution prescribing the assessment policy which is - recommended by the city staff. This policy provides that the cost of the Norby.'Pond and the Wilson Pond improvements be fully, assessed to the. benefiting property owners, and that the 'city pro= vide" "the landscaping and aesthetic improvements to these two pond.- irig, areas and the general boulevard.and right -of -way improvements descr bed:he'rein. The effect of :this assessment - policy is that T percent of the total project cost will be assessed to the ttirig property owners, with the remaining project cost to _benef be borne "by the city for these items that provide.`general public benef it . A preliminary; assessment roll has been estimated on this basis.. ; Using this assessment policy, and spreading the total estimated cost over all properties located in the drainage area for Norby and Milner! -age property owner. r Pond., prel t th e a ve .; imi woiald;be assessed for this project at ,a rate of 2`..8 per square foot.- • Using a typical, lot size of 75 feet.by 132 feet, the average home - owner``s assessment for this storm sewer improvement project would be, $277, excluding interest. If the assessment were s et up over a twenty year-period" maximum annual assessment payment - would be between .$40 and $50. -- ..w - it must be emphasized that these figures are pre iminary in, nature, and that the actual assessment for any benef ted property within the project area would be dependent on the tot 1, square footage draining into the site and the actual project cost. None- theless, existing engineering estimates.indicate that the assessable cost of the project to an individual property owner w uld be approx- imately as described. Additional detail regard rig th way in which assessments for this' project could'' be calculated /"is" c ntained in -` the :preliminary engineering report prepared :by.OSM. lthough the assessment rate calculated in this report assumes tha the total cost 'of all improvements at Norby and Wilson Ponds, cluding the landscaping and park improvements, would be assessed', the descript- ion of properties included in the special assessment. rea and the nature of calculating the assessments for those prope ties is accurate: Recommendation " If the city council wishes.toproceed with any o the drainage improvements described in this letter, it is iecommend d that the following procedure be followed: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4735, POLICY FOR STORM SEWER ASSESSMENTS ON 1979 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 738 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4735 established a policy for assessing storm sewers .constructed after 1973, and WHEREAS, this policy stipulates that the total cost of construction will be specially assessed to benefited properties, and WHEREAS, the City has been experiencing certain drainage inadequacies _ during exceptional rain storms and it appears desirable to make improvements to the existing storm drainage system to alleviate certain problems that occur during these exceptional periods, and WHEREAS, it appears desirable to change the existing storm sewer assessment policy to more accurately charge the special benefit received by the benefited • properties with the cost of providing the improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, that the City adopt the following policy for assessing 1979 storm sewer improve- ments, City Project No. 738: 1. That the total cost of a storm sewer improvement include material, manpower, equipment, financing and administrative overhead required for the special assessment procedure and performance of this work. 2. That it is hereby determined that 70% of the preliminary estimated. cost of the project, $967,000, is the direct benefit to be specially assessed against the benefited properties , $751,0003 based on a square footage rate ( 2.8G ). I 3. That the actual rate of assessment will be based on actual total cost according to the policy established in Section 2 above when'the project is completed and actual costs are known. 4. That the assessment be spread over a 20 year period at 8% interest with the privilege of prepaying the storm sewer at any time without additional interest. 5. That the policies contained in this resolution shall be subject to modification if necessary in individual cases if the council determines that the assessment or assessments resulting from the application of the policies will exceed the benefits received. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this 9th day of April, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk 9 RESOLUTION NO. 4735 RESOLUTION ON POLICY FOR STORM SEWER - ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS`, the, city has been constructing storm sewers throughout the city according to a master plan prepared in 1953 and WHEREAS`, the city council has had -a policy of assessing this storm sewer construction at a maximum assessment of $.0355 per square foot, and WHEREAS, the construction of these storm sewers throughout the city has been sub- stantially completed, and WHEREAS, the cost of constructing these storm sewers has increased considerably over the years, and WHEREAS, it appears desirable to change the existing storm sewer assessments policies to more accurately charge the benefited properties with the cost of providing the improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield that the City adopt the following general policies for storm sewer assessments: 1. That all remaining storm sewers constructed in 1974 and future years, should there be any, be assessed at its full cost of construction. 2. That the assessment be spread over a 20 year period at 8% interest with the privilege of prepaying the storm sewer assessment at any time without additional interest. 3. That the above policies begin with the storm sewer hearings held in 1973. 4. That the policies contained in this resolution shall be subject toll modification if necessary in individual cases if the council determines that the assessment or assessments resulting from the application of the policies will exceed the benefits received. - Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 14th day of February, 1972. - Mayor' Attest: City Clerk 7 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager t, Council; Letter No . 110 Agenda April 9, 1979 —0, The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council; City 'of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Review of'Bid >Tabulation and Minutes and Authorization ` -to Re advertise fore Bids Carbon Dioxide Feeder Unit - Water Treatment Plant' On March 23-, 1979, the Acting City Manager opened bids for providing :_the necessary labor, materials and equipment for the installation of carbon dioxide feeder unit at the municipal .a ., water ;treatment plant, in accordance with previous city council authorization. The public works director, pub 1ic.£safety director, and environmental health director also represented tYe city at this bid opening. The minutes and bid tabulations are attached for city council review. The 16arbon. dioxide unit would replace, the current need to dioxide' burn natural gas under water, by injecting the carbon directly into the treated water. This will lower our ependence on natural.- gas:while also minimizing repairs'to the po t- softening equipment in the water treatment process'. Two bids were received for this carbon dioxide un't, from Lee Richert Plumbing and Heating, Inc. and Shank Mecha ical, Inc. The low .bid was ;submitted by Shank Mechanical, Inc.., Minneapolis, in the amount of $96,90.0. .'Both bids significantly exc eded the engineer's original estimate of cost and the - budgeted mount of $60,.000. The public works director and water superintenden have re- vewed these bids with the city's consulting engineers. It is their recommendation, in which..'I concur, that the.bids for the carbon dioxide feeder unit,be,rejected,because thby,are in excess of the funds budgeted for this purchase. it is recommended that the. city council reject these bids, and au horize staff to revise the bid specifications and readvertise for bids for the carbon'diox'ide feeder unit— Respectfully submitted,' J Wilde cc: Public Works D irector Acting City;Manager a Finance Director z CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening March 23, 1979 Carbon Dioxide Feeder and Appurtenant Work - �jater Treatment Plant Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed .bids for carbon dioxide feeder and appurtenant .work for the water treatment plant as advertised in the official newspaper on February 26 and March 7. Present: Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager Carl Marinics, Public Works Director Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director Ken Conway, Water Department Director I. Roesler, Environmental Health Director Jean Mitchell, City Accountant The following bids were submitted and read aloud: Bidder and BASE ALT. ALT. ALT. ALT. ALT. Bid Security BID A B C D E Lee Richert Plumbing & Heating,Inc. 99,450 3,175 4,695 1,480 1,485 B.B. - 5% Shank Mechanical, Inc. 96,900 2,800 4,300 1,350 1,300 B.B. - 5% The Acting City Manager.announced that the bids would be tabulated '',and considered at the regular council meeting of April 9, 1979. Thomas J. Moran I City Clerk i C oin cil, - Lett "er'No. '109.' -3 Agri.l �, 979 „ Z. That the council consider establis'hn 5; g .par.kin b' ns on streets in Rich'`Acres to control parking on s reefs by golf course,users and to facilitate snowremo al:. It is recommended that': the council adopt the attached resolution, receiving the petition and setting a public hearing date on the street vacation.. for Aprl.24, 1979. It is also recommended: that the city council ,give,, f st. read- ing� approval to the at ached transitory, ordinance providing for this stree vacation.. Second, reading consideration of-, ordin- ance will be scheduled at the time of the public hearing. Respectfully submitted, j ce L. Wilde Acting City Manager JLW /eja cc- City Attorney Park and Recreation Director Planning & Redevelopment Director Public Safety Director Public Works Director i Fq I I . Site Plan CEDAR AVER- - I STATE �O HIGHWAY n y fYl Y 19 to AVE rO ul METRO. co i - j .. 20th 61 �•.. ...... ::::.. •r -�' l ::•:....,..'.st 21ST AV E N, • n-- N —� - if-a T -- SIR _ EXISTING PARK 04 oX PORTION OF STREET TO BE VACATED 9,y NIM i t �4 �. � 34 QA x 1 a •'r'`�''^n � — .'f.�j.^.�.� sip �d :x � � q�a ! �'+. i � r ra.wu�rx+ uacc+ ..;�9ir.4,'tII�� g 'ta4 h K' tO � t• . Fr e s } �� Y r; ��� fir♦ �� ,:����x Esc. is � z — �' ys. —`-�•, L ' "Gn it • "�' + o r�F �.. � tii 'F NN W,%, r m nayy' . Hfl� '� ` �r 'Y ri WT a .. < It �YMirt �y _I� �• A "`_ -'� - : M _ '3y s. ne �FCwAG"dr,� p� /JI 1 X � I, • r" t r.. I % 1 f / 1 Ti i 'R p. / i� �sf. h 1 Y r h E O r `• 1 I� f. 1 • tea' • + NIT IT iz CL Ut r A 0 PETITION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA - Petition No. Date Received TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota We, the undersigned owners of land abutting on 21st Avenue between the north line of Lot 9, Block 1, Rich Acres Addition and 69th Street hereby petition that the part of such street described in Attachment A be vacated by the City of Richfield. Signature of Owners Record Owners and Legal Description of Property Lot 9.and 10, Block 1, Mayor Rich Acres Addition Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of land abutting the street, alley, or public grounds (City Code of Ordinances, Section 12.04)I. per cent County Public Works checked by NSP fee paid Minnegasco Public Works Northwestern Bell Public Safety Chief Inspector ATTACHMENT A Description and Map of Portion of Street to be Vacated Description of Street to be Vacated: All that portion of 21st Avenue between the south line of 69th Street and a line across said 21st Avenue parallel to and 100 Feet north of the south line of 69th Street. PETITION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Petition No. Date Received TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota We, the undersigned owners of land abutting on 69th street between 20th Avenue and 21st Avenue hereby petition that the part of such street described in Attachment A be vacated by the City of Richfield. Signature of Owners Record Owners and Legal Description of Property Lot 10 and 11, Block 1, Mayor Rich Acres Addition Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of land abutting the street, alley, or public grounds (City Code of Ordinances, Section 12.04)1. per cent County Public Works checked by NS fee paid Mnnegasco Public Works Northwestern Bell Public Safety j Chief Insrector ATTACHMENT A Description and Map of Portion of Street to be Vacated. Description of Street to be Vacated: All that portion of 69th Streetlying between the extensions across it of the east line of 21st Avenue and the west line of Block 1, Rich Acres Addition. Bill Transitory Ordinance No. An Ordinance Providing for the Vacation of a Portion of 21st Avenue CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The following portion of 21st Avenue within the City of Richfield is hereby vacated All that portion of 21st Avenue between the south line of 69th Street and a line across said 21st Avenue para- lell to and 100 feet north of the south line of 69th Street. Section 2. The Mayor and Acting City Manager are authorized to take such action as is required to give effect to the vacation of the public right -of -way as provided in the foregoing Section 1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk Loren L. Law, Mayor �'o Bill Transitory Ordinance No. An Ordinance Providing for the Vacation of a Portion of 69th Street CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1., The following portion of 69th Street within .the City of Richfield is hereby vacated All that portion of 69th Street lying between the exten- sions across it of the east line of 21st Avenue and the west line of Block 1, Rich Acres Addition. Section 2. The Mayor and Acting City Manager are authorized to take such action as is required to give effect to the vacation of the public right -of -way as provided in the foregoing Section 1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1979. ATTEST Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk Loren L. Law, Mayor Resolution No. Resolution Receiving Street Vacation Petition and Calling for Public Hearing WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk requesting the vacation of the following portion of 21st Avenue: All that portion of 21st Avenue between the southline of 69th.Street and a line across said 21st Avenue parallel to and 100 feet north of the south line of 69t.h Street. WHEREAS, said petition complies with all aspects with the requirements of Richfield Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdivi- sion 2, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: 1) The petition for vacation of that portion of 69th Street described above is received. 2) A public hearing on the street vacation in said petition shall be held on April 23, 1979 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall beginning at 7:00 PM. 3) The Clerk is directed to public notice of such hearing in the official newspaper of the City and post notice of said hearing in the manner provided by Richfield Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdi- vision 3. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9th day of April, 1979, I Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING STREET VACATION PETITION AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk requesting the vacation of the following described portion of 69th Street: All that portion of 69th Street lying between the extensions across it of the east line of 21st Avenue and the west line of Block 1, Rich Acres Addition WHEREAS, said petition complies in all aspects with the requirements of Richfield Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdi- vision 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1) The petition for vacation of that portion of 69th Street described above is received. 2) A public hearing on the street vacation in said petition shall be held on April 23, 1979 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall.beginning at 7:00 PM. 3) The City Clerk is directed to public notice of such hearing in the official newspaper of the City and post notice of said hearing in manner provided by Richfield Ordinance Code 12.04, Subdivision 3. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9th day of April, 1979. ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk 0 Loren L. Law, Mayor r kj- A.L'. n /'1 y _ t/ It D DATE _ ( j j.�j , : cjT-Y'CUB �C � lei � l O 5 ��✓ ' "i _ _ 1 ? 3 • .. [ - - _4 p• c r.. 1 r 'r: r L� 2 -I ._ -- ��.. — !i,i�__r.�T1 1. —�•- t-�' •..i -- -- -- �- � r`% yr � i t...::,✓�'�i../ �� i..:,/ �_b..�.�I� i t . r i `^ • __.. .L� �f��,� -� A__..; - +�i1�`,.�,�,: '.vi �w„� _ i+��+,�` !"'rte �. � +y �'�^�, �aeA t{ i c._,3 ✓ 1-4 / i �5- L j i r i k s ti r { j ffL LL General Office ORDER DES b!1 Phone(612)544 -8786 Phone b 2i 5 broek -white Comp o yr �.J r construction specialties Florida Avenue So. Minneapolis, -� r N • y.�.t';_,W �.. � �,� .k 1 y5y �.i � ,N�L�+.eh� -- I S ��Y z^•r�''p�,r�ar.» : �'�� a��a crs'"Eou.�,*n- 2?k�. -� y < � �;. M r xmn F ar. 't � s � .� ;'��5"���,�y�h �'. <..Y�' :a:r Z ;}. ti:. s�+.'�."p"�,.4^�c �]� °Y'"mah!'r�. � : <sa+. 7__,�F+�i f." ,r�°pb.g°��'i ,',�.•"'K'.:'":'x��+G'�'�s ._ ..e4r'��'�. ..... „w:,e• n«-,.; ,i ': - .. .. - 3,...,.'`'':..,.:�.. ....� -- ...:2:,_.a..,; .` .s :,:::...a. -,iii: �- " B` atY�tw� °a",i'r,�'�x`�9:",�+a• -,n' h+w<?: -,".'r i'a'. aril1:' - -'� #'.hC -"� 3.'+�1;4`rati: >.Ta a .-. .;•s -.i . t ne�> ,,.,,, ......� � .a. "`""_u�. � =ss�^T�, , Lois Bendickson 7217 Chicago Avenue Ms. Bendickson has been active for many years in raising the awareness of the community to the needs of the handicapped. Lois has been a member of the Senior Citizens /Handicapped Commission and the League of Women Voters. She has tirelessly directed her interest toward housing needs, recreational /educational programs and social services for the disabled and senior citizens. Lois Bendickson has very willingly participated in studies of the disabled, and has many times presented results and recommendations of.such studies to the city council and the ,.Senior Citizens /Handicapped Commission. Ms. Bendickson has worked for, and supported, programs such as congregate dining, community center programs, Meals on Wheels, and other health and social services. Lois Bendickson has served as a model for other disabled persons, always willing to help and encouraging them to participate in activities and programs. i Date Marrh j, ]Q79 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME Yates He.l en Mary Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 6737 First Avenue South Richfield, Mn. 55423 Street No. City Zip Code MAILING, ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home —SE i-swr Business Q�tii n7 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health X Advisory Commission Other • w you believe qualify you for this Briefly discuss aspects of your experience y q y y municipal commission /committee and why you are interested in serving: Professionally I have been involved in Health Care delivery and Health Care Program development•for 15 years. I have served as the first Director of a major metropolitan clinic for Senior Citizens. I firmly believe that good health is a life long pursuit, and commmunities have a responsibility to their constituency to assist!,in the assurance of good health through planning, advising and providing.of all types of services. I would like to.be involved in the Advisory Board of Health for those reasons.'_ CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: _Camp Fire nrgani zati nn , former leader— Ameri ran Nureat A —nri ati nn , memher _ Minnesota Women's Political Caucus, member. Society of Public Health Educators, member. East Middle School Parents Advisory, Co- Chairperson. Richfield School District Parents Advisory, member OCCUPATION•: t N th t rn Hoc ital Inc Employing .firm, agency Abbot Address 810 East 27th. Street, Minneapolis, Mn:. 55407 Position _Years w /firrrl/agency TPn ate Plannin - Other work experience (optional) I have had other employment experience in the direct care of patients as a Registered Nurse. , REFERENCES (Optional) A. George Seltz None Relationship Tull Full name 6726 Pillsbury Ave, So Richfield Mn 55423 861 -5615 _ Mailing address _ Phone number B. Ronald Groat, Principal None Full name Relationship East Middle School, 7020 12th. Ave. So., Richfield 861 -8260 i City Manager's Office 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield 55423 Att: Eileen Anderson 18 CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA Office . of C "ty. Manager Councl_Letter No. 105 ,Agenda April 9, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and ;members of the City Council C ity of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Change Order for Christian Park Redevelopment Project There is 'an item on the April `9, 1979 city 'c " "ouncil agenda pro= v ding for city council approval, of a change order. for. the Christ- ian. Park redevelopment project. The change order requested is in the building, construQtio n contract with`- the Mikkelson Company. The total of the change order:is' in. the amount of $1,128.75, and includes the following provisions: 1. A separate water meter for domestic: use^ ( +$390.00) 2. Relocation of a gas line within the building' because of meter relocation ( +$250'.0p); 3. Installation of 1/4' instead of 1/8 ", lexan as interior` light in windows ( +$488:75) Recommendation The Christian Park redevelopment project is almo t complete, and there is sufficient contingency 'remaining,in the roject.to allow for``these changes. Therefore, it is the recomm ndation of the;P "ark and Recr.eation'Director,'in which .I concur, that the city ,council approve a, change . order in the amount of `' 1,128.75 to the H.O. Mikkelson Company contract. Respectfully submitted,` cevL. Wilde; / Co/ City Manager JLW /eja cc: Park and Recreation Director Finance Director RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATIOfd AND PROVIDING FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE PURCHASE OF PERPETUAL EASEMENTS, LYNDALE AVENUE WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council (City) desires to make certain improvements to Lyndale Avenue in the area of the LHN Redevelopment Project; and; WHEREAS, these improvements will provide for increased pedestrian and motor vehicular safety as well as enhancement of the visual image of the area, and, WHEREAS, the improvements will provide expanded roadway areas to accomo date medians and turning lanes and for the installation of landscape elements such as sidewalks, plant materials and street furniture; and, WHEREAS, to install these improvements it is necessary to acquire addi- tional land from private, property owners; and, WHEREAS, the City has caused appraisals of the affected property to be made, has carefully considered such appraisals, and believes the work of such appraisers was performed in a competent manner and in accordance with applicable law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD: 1. That it is necessary to acquire permanent easements over, under and across the following described areas with Just Compensation set as indicated. For improvements to the roadway (with exception noted) Easement Area #2 $70,000 Lots 1 and 2, and Lots 11 through 17 inclusive, Block 1, Fairwood Shores, according to the recorded plat thereof. The easements are described as follows: That part of said Lots 1 and 2 lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the easterly line of said Lot 1 distant 35.00 feet southerly, as measured at right angles, from the north line of said Lot 1 to a point on the westerly line of said Lot 2 distant 25.00 feet southerly, as measured at right angles from thej north line of said Lot 2. T and The easterly 22.00 feet of said Lots 16 and 17 and that part of said Lots 14 and 15 lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the i I northerly line of said Lot 15 distant 22.00 feet westerly, as measured at right angles, from the easterly line of said Lot 15 to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 14 distant 10.00 feet westerly as measured at right angles, from the easterly line of said Lot 14. Together with an easement for landscaping purooses over, under, and across that part of the easterly 22.00 feet.of said Lots 14 and 15 lying westerly of the above described right -of -way easement. Easement Area #6 516,000 The northwesterly 17.00 feet of the following described property: All of Lots 6 and 7,. Block 3,, Lvndale Shores on Wood Lake, according to the recorded plat thereof, and that part of Lot 8, said Block 3, described as follows Beginning at a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 8 distant 30.00 feet northeasterly from the southwesterly corner thereof; thence southwesterly to said southwesterly corner; thence southeasterly 40.00 feet along the southwesterly line of said Lot 8; thence northwesterly to the point of beginning. For improvement to pedestrian areas Easement Area #44, 45, 46, 27, 29 $55,000 Easement Areas #44, 45, 46 That part of the following described land (description copied from Certificate of Title No. 537960, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota): That part of Government Lot 3 and the accretions thereto, Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 all described as beginning at a point on the East line of said Government Lot 3 distant 1176.30 feet South from the North- east corner of said Government. Lot 3, thence South along said East line a distance of 145.60 feet; thence South 77 degrees, 48 minutes West (assuming said East line as bearing North and South) to the mean center line of Grass Lake, which center line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Numbers 4042 and A -2547; thence Northwesterly along said center line to its intersection with a line bearing South 82 degrees West from the point of beginning: thence North 82 degrees East to the point of beginning according to the Government Survey thereof. That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24 and that part of Government Lot 3 and the accretions thereto Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 all described as beginning at a point on the Eastlline of said Government Lot 3 distant 1321.90 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 3; thence South along said East line to its intersection with the Southwesterly line of Lyndale; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of Lyndale Avenue to its intersection with a line bearing North 62 degrees 40 minutes East (assuming the East line of said Government Lot 3 as bearing North and South) from a point on the East line of said Government Lot 3 distant 1456.30 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 3, thence South 62 decrees 40 minutes West to the mean center line of Grass Lake, which center line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set p ursuant to Torrens Case Numbers 4024 and A -2547; thence Northwesterly along said center line to its intersection with a line bearing South 77 degrees 48 minutes .lest from the point of beginning; thence North 77 degrees 48 'minutes East to the point of beginning, accord- ing to the Government Survey thereof. That part of Government Lot 1, Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, and that part of Government Lot 3 and the accretions thereto Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 all described as beginning at a point on the East line of said Government Lot 3 distant 1456.30 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Goverment Lot 3; thence North 62 decrees 40 minutes East (assuming said East line as bearing_North and South) to the Southwesterly line of Lyndale Avenue; thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of Lyndale Avenue to the most Northerly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey Number 675, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Southwesterly along the North- westerly line of said Tract A and its extension to the mean center line of Grass Lake, which center line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Numbers 4024 and A- 2547; thence Northwesterly along said center line to its intersection with a line bearing South 62 degrees 40 minutes West from the point pf beainninq; thence North 62 degrees 40 minutes East to the point of beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof, except that part of above Parcels 1., 2, and 3, described as follows That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Section 28. thence on an assumed bearing of due South along the East line of said Section 28, for a distance of 1176.30 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point A, thence continuing due South along said East line of Section 28, a distance of 419.98 feet, more or less to its intersection with the Northwesterly line of Tract A, Registered Land Survey do. 675; thence South 556 14' West along said Northwesterly line of Tract A and its Southwesterly extension a distance of 178.99 feet to the actual point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence continuingr along said line South 550 14' West to the Mean center line of Richfield Lake, which center line is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant to Torrens Case Number 4024 and A -2547; thence Northwesterly along said center line to its intersection with a line bearing South 820 00' !lest from the above described Point A; thence North 820 00' East to a point on,said line a distance of 442.58 feet Southwesterly from the above described Point A; thence South 120 16' 44" East a distance of 374.92 feet; thence North 770 43' 16" East a distance of 164.29 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 128.77 feet more or less to the actual point of beginning, all in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 675, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Southwesterly 8.00 feet at right angles to the Northeasterly line of said Tract A; thence Northwesterly 70.00 feet parallel with said Northeasterly line; thence deflecting to the left 60 degrees 00 minutes to a point distant 20.00 feet from the Southwesterly line of Lyndale Avenue, I' ■ as measured normal to said Southwesterly line; thence Northwesterly and Northerly 400.00 feet, concentric or parallel with the South- westerly and Westerly line of Lyndale Avenue, and there terminating. Easement Area #27 That part of Tract A,.Registered Land Survey No. 675, files of the Registrar Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies easterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Northwesterly line of said Tract A distant 8.00 feet Southwesterly from the Northeasterly line of said Tract A; thence Southeasterly 75.00 feet, parallel with said Northeasterly line; .thence Southwesterly, deflecting to the right 45 degrees 00 minutes, to a point distant 20.00 feet Southwesterly from said Northeasterly line; thence Southeasterly 80 feet, parallel with said Northeasterly line, and there terminating. Easement Area #29• . The northeasterly 20.00 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 675 files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the northwesterly 15.00 feet thereof. .Easement Area #28 $500 The northeasterly 20.00 feet of the northwesterly 15.00 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 675, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. i Easement Area #53 .$15,000 The easterly 10.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 3, Fairwood Shores, according to the recorded plat thereof. Easement #54 $7,000 The easterly 10.00 feet of the following property: That part of Lot 23, Block 3, Fairwood Shores, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line drawn northwesterly at right angles to the east line of said lot from a point on said east line distant 44 feet northerly from the southeast corner thereof. Easement #55 $5,000 The easterly 10.00 feet of the following property: Commencing at a point on the Southerly line of Lot 23, Block 3, Fairwood Shores, at a point 75 feet West, measured along the south line of said Lot 23 from the Southeast corner thereof; thence East along the South line of said Lot 23 a distancelof 75 feet to the Southeast corner thereof; thence Northeasterlyl,along the East line of said Lot 23 a distance of 44 feet; thence Northwesterly at right anoles a distance of 64.4 feet; thence Southwesterjly to the point of beginning a distance of 78.4 feet, more or less. • Easement Area #56S�oop The southeasterly 10.00 feet of the northwesterly 14.00 feet of Lots 24 and 25, and Block 4, Lyndale Shores on Wood Lake, accordinn to the recorded plat thereof. 2. That the City Manager and the City Attorney are authorized and directed to commence negotiations for the purchase of the perpetual easements described above. 3. That the City Manager is hereby directed to notify, in writing, the owners of the subject properties, as soon as possible, that the City oresently intends to acquire a perpetual easement provided negotiations result in the determination of a mutuaily agreeable sales price. The City Manager shall include with such notifications a statement which complies with requirements of regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban' Development, 124 C.F.R. 42.135. 4. That upon the completion of the negotiations, the City Manager shall report back to the City with a proposal for the purchase of said perpetual easements which is acceptable to the owner(s), and shall report his recommenda- tions relating to said proposals. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of 1979. 0 �. is Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk �ble.Mayor id City CouTr chf ield- _ ie 'rczty" has ,rece from Mr . Tho "mi & nature - or' fr k8OTA (! me , app ican7, was Y_ MT, KT7 � . 7 Q77 on record at gre y epaL t:IuyILA_ �.tjup: CL9drat cAauLrii pia TM record S1n"ce Mr- Wagner;received ' his'Richfield tax ut , v.�+y. cab drivers li.cens'e., n.•N1a,, 1978, -he has been, convicted of five- traffic viola -" t�ipns, "at .;ieas.t one of which was alcohol- related #� A a 'result,. of `": :these convictions the .applicant was placed in 'a "habitual violator `status .arid his, drivers license`.;was suspended .on; Janu ry' 18,: 1979': Since. when, the :applicant reapplied for a Minnesota rivers license and received "a "limited use license on March 1:6, 1 °9 9.' Based on,Mr. Wagner's recent driving viola #=ion' record, an the fact ? that`: he `only ;has ,'a ,limited" use dr- iver' z= lic nse at the present.? time,; it' `is the recommendation of" the Puplic Safety ,Directo 1-n , Wkllch I "Concur., that the 'city council deny th9] s request for , re 7,. -, newal of., 'a.,taxicab dri"ver's license. ` Respectfully `submitted c- c` L. Wilde cting City Manager JLW /`ej a cc: City Clerk Pubiic.. Safety DYector J i a � 3 f CITY 'OF RICHFIELD,'MINNESOTA Office of City Manager . ' Coundil Letter No. 101 $k Agenda. Apr "il 9, 197.9, The,Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Special Use i Permit, 11 IS Ea.st;66th Street- -In 19'60,,a Skelly Service Station was constructed on the: property located at 1115 East 66th'Street. In 1975'`the service station was demolished, anal a 7.11`convenience grocery store was constructed on the site. In 1978" the building was remodeled to house a bakery and a gift op. Oscar Lindstrom has recently remodeled 'a sm;;ail -area of the existing 'bakery, into a 14 -seat' self- service coffee bar where the" oe gift shop used to'be:: Customers will pay for bakery ;goods and coffee at the bakery counter, <and then, be able to .eat it the coffee bar area. However, because the coffee bar constitutes a restaur- ant use, a special use permit is necessary. Tho;sit is zoned C -2 - general commercial. The following items are attached to this council letter and are referred to throughout: a) zoning map; b) mite 'map; c)land use map ; and . d) traffic.. analysis . R Zoning Ordinance Requirements 1. Section`3.33, subdivision 3 requires that r_ staurants obtain special use permits before locating n C -2,_ general commercial, zoning districts; 2. Section 3.33, subdivision 4 sets standards Tvr.ith which restaurants must. comply; 3. Section _3.41, subdivision 5 requires that -i be demon- s-trated that a restaurant would not be-detrimental _to ' the public welfare., Staff , Findi.ngs 1. The proposed`restaur:ant would be in complia ce.with the comprehensive plan; '2...The. proposed ;restaurant will not result: in.= .undue traffic on surrounding- streets; U41 Flat-- E 66th .......... .... ..... 40 lb ht 12 .3i2 1L 3 t➢ 4 Q. to 111-41 M 41 \70 LA- d P;v (f) GENERAL COMMERCIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDI 15 MIS vmu 4 1. 131.30 NIA 15 *� qgo z 131.1 31.1 _4 4 Mp Al 13 .t 3114 lo 31.30 I 7-NTIAL 'hs' N CA V, r 5 z 4)1.35 5ns\ DAB '60 —Ar ftls • CD tp % - 4 �M'Q) ►ll.o 133. N-14 to 1 • 13 13147, N-10 lb ht 12 .3i2 1L 3 t➢ 4 Q. to 111-41 M 41 \70 LA- d P;v (f) GENERAL COMMERCIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDI 15 MIS vmu 4 1. 131.30 NIA 15 *� qgo z 131.1 31.1 _4 4 Mp Al 13 .t 3114 lo 31.30 I 7-NTIAL 'hs' N CA V, r 5 z 4)1.35 5ns\ ,yon L r I tio.y5 —Ar ftls • CD tp % - 4 �M'Q) ►ll.o 133. N-14 • 13 N-10 I lo 30. N14 lb ht 12 .3i2 1L 3 t➢ 4 Q. to 111-41 M 41 \70 LA- d P;v (f) GENERAL COMMERCIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDI 15 MIS vmu 4 1. 131.30 NIA 15 *� qgo z 131.1 31.1 _4 4 Mp Al 13 .t 3114 lo 31.30 I 7-NTIAL 'hs' N CA V, r 5 z 4)1.35 131.35 qo 15 01 Z IZI L 14 SI! � 5 111.14 0 4 129 0 In ca 5 - - 1%, — -- Li ti f054.0 Z13 3 _4 4 Mp Al 31 ti EAST ;o Mp Al 31 lo TIAL 7-NTIAL 11\9 CA V, r 5 z 3,0 L r I tio.y5 —Ar ftls • CD tp % - 4 �M'Q) ►ll.o 133. 3oko 133.15 EAST ;o Mp Al 31 33 91 15 3,0 14 f 133. • 13 1 .4-2 —V EAST ;o ;n j %,VV 31 -0 � 'Fence 0 1 70, ' Landscape 1 Area Landscape j Area i N BUILDING seating I rash area I Encl. -OD Concrete Walk 1 1 Fence ' 9!4 1 1 1 I I I I I ICM I I I I I I I I I I I 15'- t I I 1 1 N SCALE 1" z 20' I� EXIT ENTRANCE W Area %i 31.01 . 134.23 Z3 , t "� IZ 1!-- 13 l.ol Kill MAS ,,"* 5 14,,''° 31.14 LtA 15 4 30:1 130.3 r- 14 4.'-. 133.68 NIS 4.o4 13 N-54 5% 12 b'e DSO 130. io.1 wt 10, 1 �11. 1 --131,ot 139, n 31.01 . 134.23 Z3 , t "� IZ 1!-- 13 l.ol Kill MAS ,,"* 5 14,,''° 31.14 LtA 15 4 13e 13 NIS 14 4.'-. 133.68 NIS 40 E 66th ...... . ......... 134.23 Z3 , t "� IZ 1!-- 13 l.ol 5 4 4 1�— 130.4 3O 134-11 13e 13 NIS 14 4.'-. 133.68 NIS 4.o4 13 N-54 5% 12 b'e DSO 130. io.1 wt Ll 60 f.* 14 .31 I 1 I ' i34.2 '4 41 d U) 10, 121.45 u1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL N,VI.04 ,40 133- 4 134.23 Z3 , t "� IZ 1!-- 13 l.ol 5 4 4 1�— 130.4 3O 134-11 133,76' 14 10 4.'-. 133.68 13404 ' 4.o4 13 5% 41 d U) 10, 121.45 u1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL N,VI.04 ,40 133- I1 131.01 Z3 , t "� MULTIPLE 1!-- 13 l.ol 3 4 4 1�— 130.4 3O 133,76' 14 4.'-. 133.68 f 41 d U) 10, 121.45 u1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL N,VI.04 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a.4 I1 h�1 • MULTIPLE FAMILY '0 15 3O 14 4.'-. 133.68 f 13 5% 15 It wt Ll to%) zoo 41 d U) 10, 121.45 u1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL N,VI.04 IL C V SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a.4 O • MULTIPLE FAMILY '0 vVV 3m In 15 It wt Ll to%) zoo IL C V SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a.4 EAST MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL vVV 3m 15 15 el $13051 .,-a 1 31:14 111.14 3 I'Ll to iz ov I �Ll I T R A F F C A N A L Y S I S TRIP GENERATION Existing Use: The existing bakery use is a low volume use serving primarily the residential neighbor- hood surrounding it. Neighborhood retail commercial uses generate between 70 -240 trips for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. I would estimate the proposed use would generate approximately 100 trips for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. The existing building has a floor area of 2,030 square feet which would mean that 203 daily trips are generated by the existing use.. Proposed Use: The proposed use will not generate a signi- ficant amount of additional traffic. The seating area will primarily serve existing customers. ; Impact: The building fronts on "a major street (66th Street) which has sufficient capacity to handle any increase in traffic due to the proposed use. There will be no significant increase in traffic in residential neighbor- hoods due to the proposed use. Conclusion: The proposed use will not create undue traffic hazards or traffic congestion. P A R K I N G A N A L Y S I.S Parking Requirements: Bakery Area - 1 space for each 200 square feet of floor area.. Restaurant Area - 1 space for each 3 seats. Number of Spaces Required: Bakery Area - 1,700 square feet 1,700 - 20 = 8.5 spaces Restaurant Area - 14 seats 14 - 3 = 4.6 spaces Total Required - 13.1 spaces Number of Spaces Provided: 15 spaces Conclusion: Adequate off - street parking; space is available. ty a ail TA. C Oh February 15j. 1979r In accordance with p�evios city'` council authorization, the act ing> city= manac�erpened bids for site and bu;Zding work related to the:Richfiel' Municipal Golf Corse. 'fhe QJ.ty clerks ,spark_ and: recreation d' rector; `;publ_ic r works directory "site; And buildYng "arch�teets, a�rid r presents c t ves fr -om various bidding firms 'were ';als -o pred nt • t the ,bid opening: Th'e , -bid minutes and tabulations `are �ttac ecI :for city: councl : review. ,^.�. ,. fihe bids. 'for this pro3ecr included all items co tained .in the; plans approved by the city council, as well as number of alterrsate items . The bids were .divided -into e'ig'ht.; ajor categor ies earthwork,.;pavement and'concretej irrigation:, water wells; an pump equipment, seed %soc7fplant- .materials,; Vtil:i . ies� fencing, and= buildings . Four, firms suk�mitted bids. for: earthwork. ,: This. idding'cate ; g ray did not' 'pro' de for ;any ;alternates The Dawes ". responsible > ; der- -for .eartYiwork' zs Bolarder and Sons', with a b d of $378,Q3g Six bid wer "e submitted for pavement :'and doncr to This category al,-s -o did not include; any: liste -d alte±r�ate_s The lowest responsible bidder for tke pavement- a n d concrete wo 1 k is Btuman�- ouss Roadways,• with a.b.id of '$6 205.40 . -- The':_irrgation category:`provded for separate.:b se` bids to be. proV.ided for.n ; :automatic - system and for a partial]. manual system.." In :addition, .each type of l rrigation system. pro "Vide; for several ah 'ernate Five bids :were submitted, with ;one bidder - fading' ,bid to bid., according to specification.' The. lowest ,r sp ns"ible bid,'ert for. the= automatic irrigatson;' ystem ,is Evergreen. La n�, :with a bane b.id of'` 34,712, Two bids were subm�.tted- :for water' wells an pum iiig equipment ti The staff recommends' inc "7 usion i n tha s contracts of , he :alternate sto provide potable Water for :the maintenance f�il y.: The lowest ,, rnaking : s.ss. Ee`ncng. Sev aspects of the work. The staff recommends "the.�inclusion "of the` alternate which ,provides " for ''eight• new dugouts. Th "1" lowest re- sportsable bride "r is.�hking Fence,' with a base bid' "4 $11,422 50 and' an. "alternate: bi of $9�6. 00 for a" total bid of $" d' 1,,022".50., E _ Eleven; bids were ` submitt ,& for the elubhoW�,e" an"" ;maintenance building. The base bid provided for the clubhquse nd the alter nates. provided for different sections of the tdiinte ante building The lowest-- xesponsib]0 bidder+ a;s :Bud Johnson,,with a $22"4000.bid f..or th "C''Itibhouse,. "a% $.531,500 bid" for: the heatedn por ion of the ma.intbnance. "building,; and "a $'23",700 .bid for the col storage sects of; the °`maintenance building.. lhe: total low b d'",.th t of.Bud " Johnson, as in the amount 30S,�00` The total .contract .awards recommended to the e: ht; contractors .: for;. th:e figh t. work categories i's� in , the amount o"f : $ ,1 T 628.34'. 4 This s'f igure, falls within the : total constructions cos ' project budge >t: T h ese bids h ave been reviewed by 'the L'ark `nd Recreation " Advisory Commission and the; Golf course Ctiz :en Co ittee, both _. hgm support° the taff" recommendations or bid award . summary, it is recommended that . the city.4'. d cil take• "the following "ac?tions: 1. " "? Accopt the. bid minutes and tabulations;on• he golf course project- - 2..` '' 'Adopt the attached resolution approving thE low bidders and amounts as described-and a thO izing _ the mayor "and acting; city " manager to;execu e the" following" contract documents: i ` CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening February 15, 1979 Richfield Golf Course Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the Richfield Golf Course as advertised in the official newspaper on January 17, 24, 31, and February 7, 14, 1979. Present: Joyce Wilde, Acting City Manager Don Fondrick,Park '& Recreation Director Carl Marinics, Public Works Director Tom Moran, City Cleric The following bids were submitted and read aloud: Bidder and Schedule A Bid Security Earthwork Moore Golf, Inc. B.B. 10% $423,379.50 Wangerin Inca B.B. 10% 463 785.39 Palda & Sons, Inc. B.B. 10% 590 060.65 Carl Bolander & Sons B.B. 10% 378 029.60 Schedule B Pavement & Concrete Bury & Carlson, Inc. B.B. 10% $ 74 573.68 Hardrives, Inc. B.B. 10% 63 933.00 Black Top Surface Co. B.B. 10% 70,575.88 N.W. Asphalt, Inc. ( B.B. 10% 62 140.00 Palda & Sons, Inc. B.B. 10% 72,420.00 Bituminous Roadways B.B. 10% 60,205.40 Richfield Golf Course Bid Opening - Continued Page 2 Schedule C Swing Joint Swing Joint Bidder and Auto. Irri. Manual Alt. C -1 (Manual) (Auto) Bid Security System Irri. Syst. Zone Valves Alt. C -2 Alt. C -3 Evergreen Lawn B.B. 10% $134,712.00 $ 73,676.00 $5,234.23 $2,489.00 $7,056.00 Moore Golf, Inc B.B. 10% 246,625.00 143,125.00 5,661.00 1,500.00 3,000.00 Aqua City Irrigation $17,000 Cert.Check 165,450.00 102,125.00 4,650.00 1,840.00 4,854.00 Aqua Engineering $18,800 Cert.Check 187,929.00 120,304.00 3,618.00 2,048.00 6,944.00 Golf Course Irr B.B. 10% 99,900.00+ 24,000.00 - Schedule D Alt. D -1 Water Wells Potable Pump Equip. Wtr. Well Bergerson- Caswell B.B. 10% $117,622.00 $ 8,426.00 Lee Rickert Plumbing B.B. 10% 100,761.00 8,674.20 Schedule E Seed, Sod, Alt. E -1 Plant Mtls. Alt. E -1 Alt. E -2 Alt. E -3 Alt. E -4 Elmac Landscaping B.B. 10% $ 67,135.24 $ 11,273.02 $12,362.07 $2,941.40 $7,300.00 Moore Golf, Inc. B.B. 10% 200,365.35 14,100.00 15,600.00 10,314.00 10,000.00 Schedule F Alt. F -2 Watermain to Utilities Alt. F -1 Main Bldg. G. L. Contracting B.B. 10% $ 40,344.00 $ 11,550.00 $21,600.00 Widmer Bros., Inc. $6,500 Cert. Check 33,740.00 6,820.00 18,663.60 Palda Sons, Inc. B.B. 10% 37,396.00 4,075.00 16,512.00 O.N.P. Contracting B.B. 10% 23 216.50 5,550.00 7,699. 12 F. F. Jedlicki B.B. 10% 37,310.00 7,375.00 20,428.00 James Steele B.B. 5% 235,500.00 55,600.00 28,000.00 3,600.00 Yes i ABJ Enterprises B.B. 5% 228,591.00 52,657.00 28,238.00 4,456.00 Yes Barr - Nelson B.B. 5% 225,380.00 Kloster- Madsen, Inc. B.B. 5% 253,183.00 53,740.00 24,980.00 9,760.00 Yes 62,163.00 27,353.00 3,360.00 Yes Bud Johnson B.B. 5% 224,000.00 53,500.00 23,700.00 4,500.00 Yes Langer Const. Co B.B. 5% 249,900.00 62,376.00 31,056.00 4,152.00 Yes H. 0. Mikkelson B.B. 5% 249,000.00 65,000.00 36,000.00 4,000.00 Yes i Keho Construction i B.B. 5% 229 700.00 53 000.00 26,700.00 4,300.00 Yes Richfield Golf Course Bid Opening - Continued Page 3 s Bidder and Schedule G Bid. Security, Fencing Alt: G -1 Alt. G-2 Alt. G -3 Alt. G -4 Alt. G -5` Amco Steel" B.B. 10% $21,690.00 $43,960.00: $13,020.00 $3,000.00- $10,850.00 $20,800.00 Norm Ganz B.B. 10% 14,114.10 52, 642.10 10, 936.80 8,788.00 Viking Fence B.B. 10 %- 11,422.50 46,158.00" 11,400.00 1,200.00 8,400.00'' 9,600.00 Crowley Fence B.B. 10% 14,933.60- 50,883.70 13;863.20 1,775.00 12,425.00 12,900.00 Crown Iron Works B.B. 10% 13,494.50 51,104.00 14,012.00 2,980.00 20,860.00 23,000.00 Metropolitan Fence B.B. 10% 12,058.50 48,905.50 12,896.00 500.00 3,500.00 12,800.00 Cold Lift -- Building Heating Storage Station Base Bid Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Addenda Adolphson & Peterson _ B.B. 5% $267,400.00 $62,800.00 $30,400.00 $4,200.00 Yes James Steele B.B. 5% 235,500.00 55,600.00 28,000.00 3,600.00 Yes i ABJ Enterprises B.B. 5% 228,591.00 52,657.00 28,238.00 4,456.00 Yes Barr - Nelson B.B. 5% 225,380.00 Kloster- Madsen, Inc. B.B. 5% 253,183.00 53,740.00 24,980.00 9,760.00 Yes 62,163.00 27,353.00 3,360.00 Yes Bud Johnson B.B. 5% 224,000.00 53,500.00 23,700.00 4,500.00 Yes Langer Const. Co B.B. 5% 249,900.00 62,376.00 31,056.00 4,152.00 Yes H. 0. Mikkelson B.B. 5% 249,000.00 65,000.00 36,000.00 4,000.00 Yes i Keho Construction i B.B. 5% 229 700.00 53 000.00 26,700.00 4,300.00 Yes Richfield Golf Course Bid Opening - Continued Page 4 Cold Lift Bidder and Building Heating Storage Station Bid Security Base Bid, Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 Addenda Robert 0. Westlund B.B. 5% $236,436.00 $55,481.00 $29,043.00 $4,225.00 Yes C. 0. Field Co. B.B. 5% 250 „000.00 65,000.00 30,000.00 6,000.00 Yes - The Acting City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at a future council meeting. l Thomas J. 'ran City Clerk L i 4 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR THE RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 688 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That it is hereby determined that the bids of Bolander and Sons, Bituminous Roadways, Evergreen Lawn, Lee' Richert Plumbing and Heating, Elmac Landscaping, OMP Contractors, Viking Fence and Bud Johnson are the lowest bids, including base bids and selected alter- nates, by responsible bidders meeting specifications. 2. That the bid of Bolander and Sons, at the price contained in their proposal of February 15, 1979, with an estimated cost of $378,030.10, for earthwork is hereby accepted. 3.. That the bid of Bituminous Roadways, at the price con- tained in their ro osal of February 15, 1979, with P P an estimated construction cost of $60,205.40 for -pave- ment and concrete is hereby accepted. 4'. That the bid of Evergreen Lawn, at the price contained in their proposal of February 15, 1979, with an estim- ated construction cost of $134,712 for irrigation is hereby accepted. 5. That the bid of Lee Richert Plumbing and Heating, at the price contained in their proposal of February 15, 1979 with an estimated construction cost of $109',,435.20 for water wells and pump equipment is hereby accepted. 6. That the `bid of Elmac Landscaping, at the price contained i n their proposal of February 15 , 1979 , with an estimated construction cost of $77,376.64 for seed, sod and plant materials is hereby accepted. 7. That the bid of OMP Contractors, at the price contained in their proposal of February 15, 1979 with,an estimated construction cost of $25,646.50 for utilities is hereby accepted. i 8. That the bid of Viking Fence, at the price contained in their proposal of February 15, 1979, with an estimated construction cost of $21,022,50 for fencing!,is hereby accepted., 9. That the bid of.Bud Johnson, in the price contained in their proposal of February 15, 1979, with an estimated construction cost of 4301,200 for buildings is hereby accepted. 10. That the proposed contracts between the above named companies and the City of Richfield are hereby approved and adopted and the Mayor and Acting City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contracts for or on behalf of the City of Richfield and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to affix the city seal thereto. 11 That payments to be made under the terms of said contracts shall be charged against the proper fund. 12. That the Corporate Surety Bonds in the sum of the I� estimated contract prices which accompany said proposed contracts are hereby accepted and approved. 13. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to return the security documents to the unsuccessful bidders,upon execution of said proposed contracts. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this 4th day of April, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Thomas J. Moran City Clerk i BIDS RECEIVED AT SALE RE: $1,300,000 Gross'Revenue Recreational Facilities Bonds of 1979 4 April 1979 City of Richfield • PRICE AND TOTAL INTEREST COST BIDDERS RATE AND NET RATE M. H. NOVICK & CO. INC. 1981/1982 - 5.60% $1,279,850.00 Miller ,& Schroeder (Co- Manager) 1983 - 5.70 Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Ekstrom 1984 - 5.75 $1,205,671.25 R.S.C. Peterson 1985 - 5.80 1986 - 5.90 6.54% 1987/1988 - 6.00 1989 - 6.10 1990 - 6.20 1991 - 6.25 1992/1993 - 6.30 1994/1995 - 6.40 1996 - 6.50 1997/1998 - 6.60 1999/2000 - 6.70 ALLISON WILLIAMS 1981 - 5.60% $1,276,600.00 Gr6nin & Marcotte, Inc. 1982 - 5.70 Dain, Kalman & Quail Inc. 1983 - 5.75 $1,222,480.00 'Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Inc. 1984 - 5.80 Moore, Juran & Co., Inc. 1985 - 5.90 6.6312% • - 1986/1987 - 6.00 1988 - 6.05 1989 - 6.10 1990 - 6.20 1991 - 6.25 1992 - 6.30 1993 - 6.40 1994 - 6.50 1995/1996 - 6.60 1997/1998 - 6.70 1999/2000 - 6.75 CARLETON D. BEH CO. 1981/1986 - 6.00% $1,275,000.00 1987 - 6.10 1988 - 6.20 $1,265,913.75 1989 - 6.25 1990 - 6.30 6.8669% 1991 - 6.40 1992 - 6.50 1993 - 6.60 1994 - 6.70 1995 - 6.80 1996 - 6.90 1997/2000 - 7.00 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in the City of Richfield, on Wednesday, April 4, 1979, commencing at 12:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present and the following were absent: The Mayor announced that the meeting was convened for the, consideration of the bids which had been received for the purchase of $1,300,000 Gross. Revenue Recreational Facilities Bonds of 1979, as advertised for sale. The City Clerk - Treasurer presented', affidavits showing publication of notice of sale in the official newspaper and in Commercial West, a financial paper published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which affidavits were examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file. The City Clerk - Treasurer presented the tabulation of bids which had been received prior to the time specified in the notice of i sale, which had been opened and tabulated in the office of the City Manager with the assistance of T.G. Evensen & Associates; Inc., • financial advisors to the City. The bids were as follow S': After due consideration of the bids,.Councilmember `introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Res. No. RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $1,,300,000 GROSS REVENUE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS OF 1979 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows 1.. The bid of to purchase $1,300,000 Gross Revenue Recreational Facilities Bonds of 1979 of the City described in the notice of sale thereof is hereby found and determined to be the highest and best bid received pursuant to duly advertised notice of sale and shall be and is hereby accepted, such bid being to purchase such bonds at a price of $ plus accrued interest to date of delivery, such bonds to bear interest as follows: The sum of $ , being the amount bid in excess of $1,275,000 shall be credited to the Capital Expenditure Account in ',the Golf Course Fund of the City created by Section 2 of Resolution No., authorizing the Bonds. The City Clerk- Treasurer is directed to retain the good faith check of the successful bidder pending completion of the sale and delivery of the bonds. The City Clerk- Trea�lsurer is directed to return the checks of the unsuccessful bidders forthwith. 2. The Bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with Section 1 of Resolution No. authorizing their issuance and sale. ni The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. •. BIDS RECEIVED AT SALE RE: $1,300,000 Gross'Revenue Recreational Facilities Bonds of 1979 4 April 1979 City of Richfield •PRICE AND TOTAL INTEREST COST BIDDERS RATE AND NET RATE M. H. NOVICK & CO. INC. 1981/1982 - 5.60% $1,279,850.00 Miller & Schroeder (Co- Manager) 1983 - 5.70 Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Ekstrom 1984 - 5.75 $1,205,671.25 R.S.C. Peterson 1985 - 5.80 1986 - 5.90 6.54 % 1987/1988 - 6.00 1989 - 6.10 1990 - 6.20 1991 - 6.25 1992/1993 - 6.30 1994/1995 - 6.40 1996 - 6.50 1997/1998 - 6.60 1999/2000 - 6.70 ALLISON WILLIAMS 1981 - 5.60% $1,276,600.00 Cronin & Marcotte, Inc. 1982 - 5.70 Dain, Kalman & Quail Inc. 1983 - 5.75 $1,222,480.00 Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis Inc. 1984 - 5.80 Moore, Juran & Co., Inc. 1985 - 5.90 6.6312% 1986/1987 - 6.00 1988 - 6.05 1989 - 6.10 1990 - 6.20 1991 - 6.25 1992 - 6.30 1993 - 6.40 1994 - 6.50 1995/1996 - 6.60 1997/1998 - 6.70 1999/2000 - 6.75 CARLETON D. BEH CO. 1981/1986 - 6.00% $1,275,000.00 1987 - 6.10 1988 - 6.20 $1,265,913.75 1989 - 6.25 1990 - 6.30 6.8669% 1991 - 6.40 1992 - 6.50 1993 - 6.60 1994 - 6.70 1995 - 6.80 1996. - 6.90 1997/2000 - 7.00 i r� EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in the City of Richfield, on Wednesday, April 4,_1979, commencing at 12:30 o'clock p.m. The ,following members were present: and the following were absent: . The Mayor announced that the meeting was convened for the � 0 consideration of the bids which had been received for the purchase of $1,300,000 Gross_ Revenue Recreational Facilities -Bonds of 1979, as advertised for sale. The City Clerk - Treasurer presented affidavits showing publication of notice of sale in the official newspaper and in Commercial West, a financial paper published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which affidavits were examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file. i The City Clerk - Treasurer presented the tabulation of bids which had been received prior to the time specified in the notice of sale, which had been opened and tabulated in the office of the City Manager with the assistance of T.G. Evensen & Associates; Inc., financial advisors to the City. The bids were as follows: After due consideration of the bids, Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Res. No, RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $1,300,000 GROSS REVENUE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BONDS OF 1979 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows 1. The bid of to purchase $1,300,000 Gross Revenue Recreational Facilities Bonds of 1979 of the City described in the notice of sale thereof is hereby found and determined to be the highest and best bid received pursuant to duly advertised notice of sale and shall be and is hereby accepted, such bid being to purchase such bonds at a price of $ plus accrued interest to date of delivery, such bonds to bear interest. as follows: The sum of $ being the amount bid in excess of $1,275,000 shall be credited to the Capital Expenditure Account in 'the Golf Course Fund of the City created by Section 2 of Resolution No. authorizing the Bonds. T e City Clerk - Treasurer is directed to retain the good faith check of the successful bidder pending completion of the sale and delivery of the bonds. The City Clerk - Treasurer is directed to return the checks of the unsuccessful bidders forthwith. 2. The Bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with Section 1 of Resolution No. authorizing their issuance and sale. r The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. • CITY y OF.RICHFIELD MINNESOTA; Off ice of, C ity Manager 4 Council Letter., No. 99 Agenda-, April. 9, 1979 The Honorab.le'Mayor and t Members of tYie City Council City of Richfield ' Council Members: Subject: Authorization to Dispose of Cer`"tain City Equipment Earlier -this .year, the city council approved the purchas e. of new automobiles to replace eight existing city cars'. At that. ..time, the council was informed that the existing - vehicles would `be disposed of through Hennepin County auction after the replace- F ment,vehi.cles were received. The new automobiles will be arriving soon, and;. itAs, therefore, recommended that the°city council authorize the sale of the eight existing vehicles through Hennepin „ Couii_ty auction. All of these vehicles are fully depreciated. Council.authorization is also 'requested to dispose ofthei. following four additional pieces of equipment: one 1974 Plymouth.. Duster,. one 1,974 Plymouth Valiant, "one 1970 Cushman turf truck - ster, and one 1968 Chevrolet water flush truck. :Thes units are all fully depreciated through the central garage revolving fund, and all have been. approved by the council for 1979 replacement,. The Cushman truckster replacement'has'been delivered, and the other vehicles.are scheduled for April delivery.. It is recommended that the city council authorz sale of the.. described vehicles through public auction. - Respectfully submitted, i ` 1 J c' L. Wilde c ing City Manager. JLW /eja cc.: . Finance Director - Park and Recreation Director Public Safety Director Public Works Director f