The URL can be used to link to this page

09-10-79 agendaEXTRA ITEM 0- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 279 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000 - Relocation of Fencing and Lights from the Lyndale Avenue Easement n The Lyndale Carden Center has approximately 400 feet-of-chain link fence, six light standards, and two signs located on the ease- ment area which the city is acquiring for the Lyndale Avenue improve- ment pr_o ect.- These items must be relocated from that easement area. because they are private property necessary for operation of the business, the city must pay the costs of this relocation. It would benefit both the city and the property owner to relocate the fence and light standards at this time. This relocation work must be completed prior to October 1, which is the beginning of the garden center's fall season. Three estimates were obtained for each relocation of the fence and the relocation of light standards: Fence - Crowley Fence Company $2,770 Sterling Fence Company 2,430 Minnesota Valley Fence Co. 1,745 Light Standard - Hoffman Electric Co. 6,800 Collins Electric Co. 5,888 Cramer Electric Co. 4,380 1A The sign relocation will be handled separately. It is recommended that the city council authorize the relocation work to each of the low bidders, Minnesota Valley Fence Company, in the amount of $1,745 for the fence relocation, and Cramer Electric Company in the amount of $4,380 for the light standard relocation. Respectfully submitted, kL r? AL-L Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MIl'i!ESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 278 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Presentation by Metropolitan Council Representative a Mr. Ernest Lindstrom, Richfield's representative to the Metropolitan Council, has requested an opportunity to make a brief presentation before the Richfield City Council at their September 10, 1979 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/ ej a • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager 0 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Z Council Letter No. 277 Agenda September 10, 1979 Subject: Minutes, Tabulation of Bids, and Authorization to Reject Bids, Resealing Joints, Lyndale Avenue Between 74th and 78th Streets The city manager opened bids on September 6, 1979 for joint sealing of the Lyndale Avenue concrete pavement in accordance with previous city council authorization. The technical operations superintendent, engineering technician, environmental health director, and acting city clerk were also present at the bid opening. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for city council review. • The work for which bids were requested would provide for sealing of the joints on the reinforced concrete pavement: of Lynd- ale Avenue between 74th Street and 78th Street. Only one bid was received for this work, from Palda and Sons, Inc. St. Paul, in the amount of $53,238. This bid exceeds the estimated project cost of $30,239, by $22,999. Because the bid is so much higher than engineering estimates, and since only one bid was received, it is the recomm- endation of the acting public works director, in which I concur, that the city council reject this bid, and authorize the staff to readvertise for bids early next year, with the intent of under- taking this work in the early spring of 1980. I believe that advertisement for bids for this type of work will be more reason- able if the bids are solicited prior to the beginning of the construction season. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager Kld/ej a 0 cc: Acting Public Works Director Acting City Clerk • J CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening September 6, 1979 Joint Sealing of Reinforced Concrete Pavement - Lyndale Avenue Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1915, a meeting of the administrative staff was called by Karl Nollenberger, City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the joint sealing of reinforced concrete pavement at Lyndale Avenue, 74th to 78th Street, City Project No. 748, as advertised in the official newspaper on August 22, and 29, 1979. Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager Marshall Raaen, City Engineer Art Bailey, Engineering Technician II M. Roesler, Environmental Health Director Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk • The following bid was received and read aloud: BIDDER AND BID SECURITY TOTAL BID Palda & Sons, Inc. B.B. 5% $53,238.00 Addendum Acknowledged The City Manager annouced that the bid would be tabulated and considered at the September 10, 1979, city council meeting. Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 276 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request to Sponsor Grant Application For the past year, the City of Richfield has served as the sponsor for a grant administered by The Storefront/Youth Action, Inc.. This grant, which funded the adolescent victim counseling program, is currently concluding its first year, and The Store- front/Youth Action, Inc. is finalizing an application for second year funding to support this program. The adolescent victim counseling program grant is with federal law enforcement action agency funding. lines require that a local unit of government sponsor applications for such funding. The Storefront/Youth has requested that the City of Richfield again serve for the second year grant application to support this financed LEAA guide- all grant Action, Inc. as the sponsor program. Richfield's serving as sponsor for the grant application re- quires no funding from the city. The Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. is required to provide matching funds for the program, and allocates a portion of the regular support which the city provides to that agency as their matching funds. In 1979, Richfield supports The Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. with a $22,000 appropriation, which is recommended to increase to $24,000 in 1980. The city receives some minimal administrative monies from this grant program, to cover our cost of administration associated with the grant. Attached to this council letter is the request from The Store- front/Youth Action, Inc. that the city sponsor the grant applica- tion, and a resolution providing for Richfield sponsorship of this grant. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja 71.15 Harriet Are. So., Riclbfield, .11V55423 (612) 861-1675 STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION 5005 Valle), View Rel., Edina, ,11N55435 1612) 926-1851 s,p 'r4, f ?.??y`y [ t:? ?e September 4, 1979 Mayor Loren L. Law and Richfield City Council 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minn. Dear Mayor Law and Council: As you are aware, the Richfield City Council is currently sponsoring an L.E.A.A. grant for Storefront/Youth Action. The grant, The Adolescent Victim Counseling Program, is currently in it's first year. I am in the process of submitting an application for second year funding and I would I ike to request that the Rich- is field City Council continue to sponsor this grant. The grant will require no additional funds from Richfield, but will mean that we will again use some Richfield funds to match the L.E.A.A. dollars, I expect that the total grant will be about $46,000.00, which would mean about $4,000.00 would be used to match about $42,000.00 The program is going very well though as we anticipated this is an extremely difficult population to work with. The Program is serving as a valuable in-house referral as wel I as generating referrals from external sources. I have enclosed a copy of the resolution which I need to submit with the grant. I will be happy to answer any additional questions you might have. SRL:ndc enc. I • Sin r I?ejjli?n?sk lt6Q? e i , ecutive Director Storefront/Youth Acti r? 1979 SAP 5 R{cn?}ela City ?1a?age. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION) OF' GRANT SPONSORSHIP WHEREAS, The Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. has requested that the City of Richfield serve as the sponsor for the second year grant application to support their Adolescent Victim Counseling Program, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield is in full approval of submission of the grant application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield, Minnesota agrees to act as sponsoring unit of government and grantee for the project titled Adolescent Victim Counseling to be conducted by the Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. for the second year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Steve Lepinski, Executive Director 0 of The Storefront./Youth Action, Inc. is hereby authorized to apply to the Crime Control Planning Board for funding of the project and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Richfield. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of September, 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk s CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 275 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Gambling Second Reading There is an item scheduled on the September 10, 1979 city council agenda providing for the council to give second read- ing consideration to an ordinance amendment which would provide for the conduct of certain gambling activities by non-profit organizations. Chapter 5.07 of the 1978 Minnesota Laws amended the statute relating to gambling devices. That legislation authorized city councils to adopt local ordinances which would premit some forms of gambling to be used by non-profit organizations for fund rais- ing. The ordinance amendment which is before the city council at this time would meet the requirements of Chapter 5.07 and would also integrate the new licensed activities with the regulation of bingo in existing city ordinance. During the council's previous discussions of this ordinance amendment, several questions were raised regarding certain pro- visions of the proposed ordinance. On August 13, 1979, the city council requested the city attorney to evaluate those questions and recommend changes to certain provisions of the proposed ordin- ance. The ordinance amendment which is attached to this letter re- flects the changes which have been made by the city attorney. A copy of the city attorney's letter, explaining the changes which have been developed, is also attached. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja • cc: City Attorney voPublic Safety Director Acting City Clerk Bill 1979-16 A-IE14DMENT TO CHAPTER V, PART II, SECTION 5.19 AND APPENDIX D OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: A. Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.19 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield dealing with the licensing and regulation of certain types of amusement and recreation is hereby amended to read as follows: "5.19 BINGO, GAMBLING DEVICES AND RAFFLES Subdivision 1. Definitions. (1) The following terms shall have the meanings given to them by Minnesota Statutes, [1976]1978, Sections 349.12 and 349.26: [(1)] (a) Active member [(2)] (b) Bingo • [(3)] (c) Bingo occasion [(4)] (d) Checker [(5)] (e) Lawful purpose [(6)] (f) Organization [(7)] (gT Profit [(8)] (h) Bingo manager (i) Gambling devices (j) Paddle wheel (k) Tipboard (1) Raffle (2) As used in this section, the term "gambling" shall refer and 0 be limited t of raffles. (3) As used in this section, the term "gambling occasion" means a single gathering or session at which gambling is conducted. Subdivision 2. License Required. Any organization authorized to apply for [a] bingo or gambling licenses pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, [1976] 1978, Chapter 349, shall apply to the City Clerk for a license before conducting [the game of bingo] any such activity, within the city. [Bingo] No such activity may [not] be conducted until the proper license is issued. Subdivision 3. Application. Application shall be made on forms prepared for that purpose by the City Clerk. Separate application shall be made for bingo and gambling licenses., Applications shall be verified by a duly appointed officer.of the organization and by the Y' C "r person designated by the organization as bingo or gambling manager. Applications shall state the dates for which permission to [play the game] conduct the activity is requested and the place where the [games] activities will be [played] conducted. The application shall contain an agreement on the part of the applicant that if the license applied for is granted, the licensee will save the city and its officers, agents and employees harmless against any claims or actions and the cost of defending the same arising out of or by reason of the granting of the license or the conduct of any of the activities authorized by the license. The City Clerk may require additional information on the application for the purpose of carry- ing out the provisions of this section. No application for a gambling license may be submitted until the effective date of this section. Subdivision 4. Change in Organization Officers. If during the period for which [the] a license is issued there is a change in the officers of the organization, or in the person designated to act as bingo or gambling manager, a new application disclosing such change must be made and filed with the city clerk. Subdivision 5. License Fee and License Year. The annual license fee for bingo licenses and for gambling licenses-a4wmlaWsoc OA b,;nn tj^^„°" shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code. The [annual] license year in the case of both types of licenses shall run from January 1 [to] through December 31 of the year. Subdivision 6. Bond. (1) At the time of filing the application, the designated bingo or gambling manager shall file with the City Clerk a fidelity bond with the manager as personal surety4[with corporate surety duly licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota]. Such bond shall be in the amount of $10,000 for each.bingo license requested and $10,000 for each qamblinq license requested even though the same gambling manager. Sucn nonas snail ne s city attorney as to form and execution. favor of the organization conducting the conditioned as follows: (a) The designated bingo or gambling manager will obey all ordinances and statutes relating to the licensed activity. (b) The designated bingo or gambling manager shall fully and faithfully perform his duties. i • (c) The bond may not be cancelled for any reason without the written consent of the city and then only after [at least] 30 days written notice of intention to cancel the bond. (2) The city council may upon unanimous vote waive the bonding requirement. If waived, the license shall state that it is issued with a waiver of [surety] fidelity bond. -2- The bonds shall run in [bingo] activity and be (3) Should there be [any] a change in the designated bingo or gambling manager during the license year, the new [bingo] manager shall, before assuming his duties, comply with all of the bond requirements of this subdivision. Subdivision 7. Approval and Issuance of License. The application shall be referred to [the Police and Fire Divisions of] the Public Safety Department[, to the inspection division of the Public Works Department] and to such.other persons or departments as the city manager shall deem appropriate for investigating and recommendations. The application shall thereupon be returned to the city manager who shall note his own recommendations and comments thereon. The application shall be then presented to the council for final approval or denial. The council may not act on the application until at least 30 days after it has been submitted in completed form; and must act within 180 days of submission. Subdivision 8. Conditions Governing Issuance. The following conditions govern the issuance of licenses pursuant to this section: (1) No license shall be issued to an organization whose desig- nated manager, or any organization officer, has been convicted by any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense which relates to the competency of the designated manager or the organization to perform the licensed activity. (2) Licenses shall be issued only upon applications which are • complete in every respect and have been accompanied by the payment of the annual license fee and filing of the bingo or gambling manager's [surety] fidelity bond. (3) No license shall be issued to any organization unless such organization has existed in the city for at least three years prior to the date of application. [This restriction shall not apply if the organization making application is, or is a subsidiary of, any religious, charitable or fraternal organization of national or statewide jurisdiction which has been in existence for at least three years.] (4) No license shall be issued to any organization which does not have, on the date of application, at least 30 active members. (5) No license shall be issued to any organization whose desig- nated bingo or gambling manager is not a member in good standing of the organization and who has not been a member for at least two years prior to the date on which application is made. (6) No organization may be licensed to conduct bingo or gambling on any leased premises without a written lease for a term at least equal to the term of the [bingo] license sought and in no event for a term.extending less than six months from the date the license is issued. In the case of bingo, lease payments shall be at a fixed monthly rate or rate per bingo occasion, not subject . to change during the term of the lease.- No such lease shall pro- vide that rental payments be based on a percentage of receipts or projects from bingo occasions.. -3- 11 t t$. .r Subdivision 9. Conditions Governing Conduct of Bingo and Gambling. organization. (1) The bingo manager shall not be the bingo manager for any other organization. The gambling manager shall not be the gambling manager for any other organization. One person may simultaneously serve as the bingo manager and the gambling manager for the same (2) No compensation shall be paid to any person in connection with [a] bingo or gambling [occasion] activities except that in the case of bingo, an active member of the organization, or its auxiliary, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member, conducting the bingo occasion. In the case of bingo only, a [nor shall any] person not an active member of the organization or its auxiliary, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member may participate in the conduct of a bingo occasion [, except] by resolution of a majority of the membership recorded in the approval minutes of the organization. Non-management assistants who are not active members of the organization, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member, may be hired to assist members in conducting the bingo occasion. Compensation shall not exceed $12.00 per bingo occasion. (3) Unless the city council shall so provide in the license, no more than 104 bingo or gambling occasions each year or two bingo or gambling occasions per week may be conducted by the organization. No bingo or gambling occasion shall continue for more than four consecutive hours.. (4) Any person or corporation, other than an organization, which leases any premises that it owns to two or more organizations for purposes including the conduct of bingo occasions, shall not allow more than four bingo or gambling occasions to be conducted on the premises in any week. (5) Any organization which leases any premises to one or more other organizations for purposes including the conduct of bingo occasions shall use the proceeds to the rental, less reasonable sums for maintenance, furnishings and other necessary expenses, only for lawful purposes as defined in Minnesota Statutes, [1976] 1978, Section 349.12. At the end of each license year the organization shall report to the City Clerk the disposition of all receipts which it has received during the license period from the rental on its facilities to other organizations for purposes including the conduct of bingo occasions. . (6) Prizes for a single bingo game shall not exceed $100.00 except for prizes for a game of the type commonly known as a "cover-all" game which shall in aggregate value not exceed $500.00. The aggregate of prizes for a bingo occasion shall not exceed $2,500.00, except that when the bingo occasion includes a "cover- all" game, the aggregate of prizes shall not exceed.$3,000.00. Merchandise prizes shall be valued at fair market retail value. i • • -4- y ' (7) Total prizes from the operation of paddle wheels and tipboards awarded in a single day.in which they are operated shall not exceed $500.00. Total prizes resulting from any single spin of a paddle wheel or from a single tipboard shall not exceed $100.00.. The total prizes awarded for both paddle wheel and tip- board by any organization shall not exceed $15,000 per license year. [7] (8) No expense shall be incurred or amounts paid in con- nection with the conduct of bingo, except those reasonably expended for bingo supplies and equipment, prizes, rent or utilities used during the bingo occasion, bingo license fees, taxes related to bingo and compensation to active members who conduct the game. (9) No expense shall be incurred or amounts paid in connection with licensed gambling activities except those reasonably expended for prizes, local licensing fees, taxes and maintenance costs for the gambling devices. [8](10) Each bingo or gambling winner shall be determined and every prize shall be awarded and delivered the same day on which the bingo [occasion] or gambling activity is conducted, except that raffle winners not present for the drawing may be delivered their prizes at a later date. [9] (11) All bingo or gambling activities [occasions] shall be under the direct supervision of the designated bingo or gambling manager who shall be responsible for gross receipts and profits • from bingo or gambling and for the conduct of the bingo or gambling activity [occasion] in compliance with all applicable statutes and ordinances. '[10] (12) Bingo or gambling shall not be conducted on dates or at places other than those dates and places enumerated in the application. [11] (13) Bingo and gambling may only be [played] conducted only in the hall where regular meetings of the organization are held unless otherwise permitted by the council[.); provided that tipboards are permitted in areas. where the licensee regularly sells food and beverages. Tickets for raffles conducted in accordance with this section may be sold off the premises, but may not be sold in residential districts of the city[.] without prior approval of the city council. [12] (14) Bingo and gambling may [shall] not be played by any person .un3-er 18 years of age unless accompanied by his parent or legal guardian. Subdivision 10. Recording Players and Receipts-Bingo. One or more checkers shall be engaged for each bingo occasion. The checker or checkers shall record the numbers of cards played in each game prior to the completion of each game and record the prizes awarded to the recorded cards. Each checker.shall certify all figures which he has recorded as accurate and correct to the best of his knowledge. This record shall be kept on file by the association within the city and shall be open to inspection by city police officers. -5- 1. 1 Subdivision 11. Records. Each organization shall keep records of its gross receipts, expenses and profits for each [bingo] single gathering or occasion. Gross receipts shall be compared to the checker's records for the bingo occasion by a person who did not sell cards for the bingo occasion. All deductions from gross receipts [for a bingo occasion] shall be documented with receipts or other records indicating the amount, a description of the purchased item or service or other reason for the deduction and the name of the recipient. The distribu tion of profits shall be itemized as to payee, amount, and date of payment. [Bingo] Gross receipts from each activity required to be licensed under this section shall be segregated from other revenues, including other activities licensed hereunder, and placed in a separate account. Each. organization shall maintain separate records of [its bingo] each licensed operation[s]. The person who accounts for [bingo] gross receipts, expenses and profits shall not be the same person who accounts for other revenues of the organization. Records required to be kept by this section and by Minnesota Statutes [1976], 1978, Chapter. 349 shall be preserved for at least three years. Licensees shall make their bingo and gambling records available to.the [police] public safety department at any reasonable time and after proper notice. Subdivision 12. Reports and Applications. (1) If any discrepancy is found between the amount of gross receipts for a bingo occasion as determined by the checker's records and the amount of gross receipts as determined-by totaling the cash receipts and the discrepancy exceeds $20.00, the discrepancy shall be reported to.the City Cler.k.within five days of its discovery. (2) An organization shall report monthly to its membership gross receipts [from bingo], its expenses, its profits [from bingo] from the licensed activity and the distribution of these profits itemized.as required by subdivision 11 of this section and Minnesota Statutes 1978, Sections 349.17 and 349.26. Copies of all such reports shall be furnished monthly to the City Clerk. (3) At least 30 days prior to conducting its first [bingo occasion] licensed activity of the license year, an organization shall file with the City Clerk copies of the following: (a) Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, "Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax", Form 990, or a comparable form if the organization is required to file the form with the Department of the Treasury; (b) Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service,"Exempt Organization Business Income Tax", Form 990-T, or a comparable form if the organization is required to file the form with the Department of the Treasury; -6- ' (c) The annual report required of charitable organizations by Minnesota Statutes, [1974] 1978, Section 309.53, provided that the organization that conducts '[b-1 go] licensed activities but is exempt from submitting this report to the Department of Commerce under Section 309.53, Subdivision l..a, shall nevertheless submit such a report under this subdivision; (d) The Minnesota Department of Commerce Operations". All information contained in th, true, correct and complete to the best of the person or persons signing the statement. Any knowingly make a false statement or knowingly fact in the statement shall be subject to the in subdivision 14 of this section. "Statement of Bingo statement shall be knowledge of the person who shall conceal a material penalties provided (e) Any lease agreements required by this [ordinance] section executed by the organization in regard to premises leased for the conduct of [bingo] the licensed activity. Subdivision 13. Revocation or Suspension of License. The license may be revoked or suspended by the city manager whenever the licensee, its owners, directors, bingo manager, gambling manager, or employees or agents have engaged in any of the follow- ing conduct: (1) Fraud, deception or misrepresentation in connection with the securing of a license. • (2) Conduct inimical to the interests of public health, safety, welfare or morals. (3) Conduct involving moral turpitude. (4) Conviction for an offense involving moral turpitude or relating to the conduct of the licensed activity. (5) Failure to promptly comply with any of the requirements of this [ordinance] section or state laws relating to bingo or gambling. '(6) Engaging in activity, action or change which would.have disqualified the licensee from obtaining a license. The matter shall then proceed as provided in Richfield Ordinance Code Section 5.14 Subdivision 4. Subdivision 14. Penalty. Any alleged violation of the pro- visions of this section which shall also constitute a violation of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, [1976], 1978 Chapter 349 shall first be presented to the office of the Hennepin County Attorney for prosecution of a gross misdemeanor. In any instance where the county attorney shall decline, for ahy reason, to prosecute the alleged violation, and in all other cases involving • alleged violations of this section the matter shall be presented to the city attorney for prosecution as a misdemeanor. -7- . ? . Subdivision 15. Existing Licenses.. All licenses heretofore issued for the conduct of bingo_.shall continue unless revoked or suspended until the end of the current license year.[terminate upon the effective date of this ordinance. Any organization whose license is terminated must cease conducting bingo not later than twenty days thereafter unless within that period it makes application as above provided. If application is made, the organization may continue to conduct bingo until the council shall act upon the application and thereafter if a license is granted.] Subdivision 16. Exemptions - Bingo. In lieu of obtaining the annual bingo license as provided in this section, daily permits may be issued, covering the conduct of bingo if conducted. (1) In connection with a county fair conducted by a county agricultural society or association, the state fair conducted by the state agricultural society, or a civic celebration recognized by resolution or other similar action by the city council provided that bingo is not conducted more than twelve days in any one calendar year. (2) By an organization which conducts less than five bingo occasions in any calendar year. Application for daily permits shall be on forms prepared for the City Clerk for that purpose. Applications shall be presented to the council for its approval. The daily permit fee shall be as provided in Appendix D of this Code and the city council may waive all or part of the fee. The council may also place such conditions and restrictions upon the daily permit as it shall deem necessary. Subdivision 17. License Fee Reduction - Gambling. The fee established in subdivision 5 of this section shall not apply to gambling license applications involving not more than 5 single occasions during.the license year. In such instances, the fee shall be as provided in Appendix D of this code and the city council may waive all or part of the daily permit fee. B. Appendix D of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield establishing fees for various licensed activities is hereby amended by amending Section 5, paragraph 3 thereof to read as follows: . u • Type of Permit Section Fee of License Requiring Schedule Fee (3) Bingo and Gambling 5.19 a. Daily permit. Bingo and Gambling, each type 1 day $30.00/daN b. Annual license-Bingo [1 year] Calendar year $200.00 c. Annual license-Tipboard Calendar year $200.0- d. Annual license-Paddle wheel Calendar year $200.00 -8- e. Annual license-Raffle Calendar year $200.00 f. Annual licenses. If the licensee is granted a license for any two gambling activities other than Bingo (i.e. tipboard, paddle wheel or raffle), the license fee shall be $ 300 and if the licensee receives an annual license for all three types of gambling, the license fee shall be $ 400 Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , 1979. Loren L. Law Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • 0 -9- .r CITY OF FICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 274 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: -Y U TICII ?G Q3 (b ,T Subject: Planned Unit Development Plan, Preliminary Plat, Street Vacation and Request for Fire Zone Change, Wood Lake School Site • 4 On October 24, 1977, the city council approved a rezoning, planned unit development plan, preliminary plat, and special use permit for a three-phase, multiple-family development to be built on the Wood Lake School site by the Richfield Development Corpora- tion. The project included the development of 129 condominiums in four, three-story buildings with access to be provided from Emerson Avenue, Rae Drive, and West 66th Street. Underground park- ing was also to be provided. The city council action approved the project and also rezoned the property to PMR. Since that time, the Richfield Development Corporation has sold the Wood Lake School site to Duraps, Inc. of Winnipeg, Canada, contingent upon city approval of the Duraps plan for site develop- ment. Duraps, Inc. has now submitted a PUD plan, preliminary plat, and two street vacation requests for city council approval. Proposal The concept of the Duraps development is to integrate its multi- family character into a single family neighborhood. This is accomp- lished with edge treatment, low level buildings, terraces, and even the shape of the garages. Beside integration with the surrounding neighborhood, the development is intended to create an established feeling. The shape of the structure, landscape treatment, and retention of large trees existing on the site accomplish this goal. It is the developer's intent to construct a 92-dwelling unit miltiple family housing development. The development will con- sist of nine buildings with eight dwelling units each, and two buildings with ten dwelling units each. The buildings will be two stories high with the exception of the two buildings along the lake. The back half of those buildings will be three stories, because of the grade change in that area of the site. There will be four dwelling units per floor (except for the lowest floor of the buildings along the lake) and each dwelling unit will have a Council Letter !vo. 274 -2- September 10, 1979 private entrance. There will be 24-one bedroom units with 854 square feet of floor area each, 58-two bedroom units with 1,054 square feet of floor area, and 10-three bedroom units with 1,254 square feet of floor area each. Each unit will be individually owned and will have an average sales price of $65,000. The build- ings will be of wood frame construction with brick and wood or wood-type siding exterior. There will be 135 parking spaces provided on the site. Of these, 94 will be in detached, two-car garages. Access to the site will be provided by cul-de-sac type private driveways from 66th Street, Emerson Avenue, and Rae Drive. The development will be built in one phase with construction to begin in December, 1979 with completion by December, 1980. The total estimated value of the development will be $5,980,000. The applicant is also requesting that a portion of 65th Street and a portion of a street easement running from Rae Drive to Richfield Lake be vacated. The applicant is exploring the possibility of using housing mortgage revenue bonds to finance the development. The following items are attached to this Council Letter: 1. Site plan 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Perspective sketch Zoning map Land use map Comprehensive plan map Redevelopment plan Traffic and access analysis Gross land use analysis Letter requesting fire zone change Street vacation resolutions and ordinances Zoning Ordinance Requirements 1. Sections 3.31 and 3.37 set standards for multiple family developments 2. Section 3.34A sets standards for planned unit devel- opment districts. 3. Section 3.41 establishes criteria for issuing special use permits. Other Ordinance Requirements 1. Section 3.54 sets standards for land subdivisions and sets platting procedures. 2. Section 4.05 sets standards for off-street parking areas. 3. Section 12.04 sets procedures for street vacations. -3- Staff Findings • The staff has reviewed this proposal and found the following: 1. Relationship to Ordinances and Plans The PUD ordinance requires that a PUD project be compared with the zoning ordinance requirements otherwise appli- cable to this type of development, i.e., if this devel- opment were not developed under the PUD ordinance, the provisions for Group Housing Developments in Section 3.37 of the zoning ordinance would otherwise be required. Shown below is a comparison of requirements in the Group Housing Development ordinance, the provisions of the previous development proposal for this site, and what is proposed in this PUD project: Previously Now Required Proposed Proposed Parking 1.5 sp/du 1.8 sp./du 1.48 sp/du 1 enclosed Density 22 du/ac 21.49 du/ac 12.8 du/ac Setbacks front 30 feet front 110' on Front 33' on 66th 66th Street • Rear 25 feet Front 150' on Front 20' on Emer- Emerson son Side 25 feet Rear 29' on Lake Rear 28' on Lake Side 20' west Rear 20' on west Side 22' east Side 15' east Open space 300 sf/du 1,244 sf/du 2,364 sf/du open and open space space Recreation 270 sf/du 282.6 sf/du recre- recreat. space ation space The comprehensive plan, as amended by the city council in June, 1976, indicates multi-residential land use of a medium to high dens- ity on this site. This site is within the boundaries of the Lyndale Hub/Nicollet redevelopment project. The redevelopment project plan also indicates multi-residential land use on this site of up to 200 dwelling units. The development plans have been evaluated against the subdivis- ion regulations of the city, and the staff has found that there is no departure from the subdivision regulations if proper utility easements are provided. It is the opinion of the staff that the proposed project is in general conformance with the comprehensive plan and the redevelopment project plan, that the differences be- tween the proposal and the otherwise applicable provisions for Group Housing Development are minimal, and that these differences would not be detrimental to the public interest. Any potential problems associated with the proximity of the development to the property line on the east side can be mitigated with fencing and Council Letter -4- landscaping, although some shadow effect will occur in the east property's rear yard in the early summer evenings. This shadow effect will be less than that of a two-story, single family dwelling because-a single family dwelling could be located five feet closer to the property line. The closer the building is loca- ted to the property line, the greater the shadow effect will be. 2. Availability of public Services This site is adequately served by utilities, including gas, water, electricity and sanitary sewer. A 16" water line passes throughthe property. Water and natural gas are available under 66th Street and Emerson, and sanitary sewers of an adequate size are also available under 66th Street and Emerson. Storm sewers are presently not available on the site, but are available on 66th Street. When the permanent streets were constructed on Emerson and 65th Street, storm sewers were installed there and are available to the site. The developer will properly dispose of on-site surface water through catch basins and storm drains. 3. Traffic Circulation and Control The project is designed to provide ingress and egress from five separate locations. A cul-de-sac design concept has been used to eliminate through traffic from the project site to provide safer conditions within the site, and to minimize traffic through the adjacent residential neighborhoods. The total trips per day generated by this project will be 515 (210 trips fewer than in previous proposal). Approximately 191 trips, or 37 percent, will be through accesses on Emerson Avenue, 30 percent or approximately 157 trips, will be through accesses on 66th Street, and 32 percent or approximately 167 trips, will be through the Rae Drive access. Access via Rae Drive will direct traffic by three single family residential homes, and four multi-family buildings. Access via Rae Drive and Emerson Avenue is more desirable than providing access only from Emerson. The intersection of Emerson Avenue and 66th Street is presently congested, although planned improvements to 66th Street will relieve some of the congestion. Emerson Avenue is lined with several single family homes, and splitting the traffic between Emerson and Rae Drive will diversify traffic, reduce im- pacts on surrounding residences, and help reduce peak hour con- gestion which might otherwise occur. The proposed development will also generate less traffic on these streets than the previous- proposal because of the fewer dwelling units and the cul-de-sac design concept. The majority of traffic from the development will end up on 66th Street. At this time 66th Street carries approximately 24,500 vehicles per day in both directions. Once the L/H/N -5- redevelopment project is completed, traffic projections indicate that 23,000 vehicles per day will travel on 66th Street between • I-35W and Lyndale Avenue. Thirty-one accidents occurred on 66th Street between Lyndale and I-35W in 1975, according to public safety department records. The additional trips resulting from the proposed development could result in one or two more accidents per year over this segment of 66th Street. However, the planned signalization, channelization, and widening of 66th Street in the area of the site should reduce the number of accidents in the area. The applicant has agreed to dedicate an additional 20-foot right-of-way easement adjacent to 66th Street for the planned street improvements. Once the planned center median is constructed on 66th Street, the 20 dwelling units served by the west access drive onto 66th Street will not have access to the eastbound lane of 66th Street. This will result in a slight increase in traffic in residential neighborhoods to the north and west of the site, as cars turn off westbound 66th Street to go around a block to get back on eastbound 66th Street. The Emerson Avenue-66th Street intersection will be posted for no U-turns. The median will have a mountable type curb to allow fire and emergency vehicles access to the west driveway on 66th Street. The Hennepin County Public Works Department has objected to the west curb cut, and are of the opinion that only the planned east curb cut on 66th Street should be provided to insure proper traffic flow on 66th Street. The Hennepin County Public Works Department is currently studying design alternatives to minimize traffic flow problems which may be caused by the west curb cut. All interior access drives will be 24 feet wide, which will provide sufficient width for safe vehicle travel on the site. The access drives will be properly lit. All unenclosed parking stalls will be 9 feet by 20 feet. 4. Light Exposure and Air Circulation The setbacks provided between the multi-family dwellings allow for adequate amounts of light exposure and air circulation for all the housing units. The easterly building will cast an early summer evening shadow on the backyard of the property immediately east of the proposed development. It is the opinion of the staff that the design of the buildings, their orientation on the site to light, air, open space, and ad- jacent land uses will provide for a quality living environment, although special care should be taken to mitigate the shadow effects on the adjoining property to the east. 5. Nature and Extent of Open Space The project will provide landscaped green areas between the proposed buildings and three large green areas on the interior of the site. An outdoor swimming pool will be provided. The site -6- also offers the natural and the ;food Lake Nature access to open space and walkway system. amenities of the adjacent Richfield Lake Center. All dwelling units will have recreation areas by way of a pedestrian A bikeway is planned around Richfield Lake as part of the Richfield bikeway plan. The applicant supports this concept and has agreed to cooperate in the provision of bikeway easements adjacent to or through the site. The planned location of the bikeway adjacent to the lake may not be possible because of limi- tations posed by Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' regulations concerning construction with public bodies of water, although the staff has asked for additional information from the DNR concerning those regulations. 6. Impact of Project on Neighborhood Mutliple family projects are usually not in scale with a single family residential neighborhood. However, this project's orienta- tion on the site, the low profile presented by the two-story struct- ure, the use of brick and wood siding and the residential type of architecture help blend this project into the established character of the neighborhood without a detrimental impact on the existing residences. The character of this project better fits the resi- dential character of the area than the previous proposal, or than the school which formerly existed on the site. The project should promote a positive image on this site and the surrounding area. • 7. Street Vacations The portions of the streets requested to be vacated are pres- ently undeveloped and unused except for utilities. The portion of 65th Street to be vacated serves only as access to this site and for a city water main. The proposed bikeway would also have to enter the site at this point. This portion of 65th Street can be vacated without public detriment if the utility and bikeway ease- ments are maintained. The portion of undeveloped street easement from Rae Drive to Richfield Lake which the applicant is requesting to be vacated serves no public purpose at this time. A ten foot wide bikeway easement should be maintained, however. 8. Preliminary Plat The attached drawings, PA 1 and 2 constitute the preliminary plat. All required information is provided for in the plat except for a subdivision title and additional easements for public utilit- ies and bikeways. 9. Fire Safety The public safety department has requested that the dwellings in the development have a fire suppression sprinkler system in- stalled. This will allow immediate fire suppression, and positive identification of the fire location. A sprinkler system installa- tion provides opportunity to link the system directly to the public -7- safety department, thus providing for immediate notification. These are important points because of the density of development, the miltiple building design of the project, and the multiple access design. The applicant is requ of the site be changed frc that the fir3 zone 1 requi would prevent the project quirements are aimed at hi uses, while fire zone 3 re residnetial type uses. Fi on sites, building design, buildings. The staff has that the requested fire zC also recommended the fire ing the site be studied as should be cornpleted at the Staff Recommendations esting that the fire zone designation m fire zone 1 to fire zone 3, contending rements are unfairly restrictive and from being developed. Fire zone 1 re- gh density commercial and industrial type quirements are aimed at low density re zones govern placement of buildings and the materials which can be used on reviewed the request and would recommend ne change be approved. However, it is zone designations of the areas surround- well and that all necessary changes same time. 1. Preliminary PUD Plan and Special Use Permit Judging this proposal against applicable ordinances and plans, it is the opinion of the staff that the concept of this proposal is generally in conformance. The proposed project taxes maximum advantage of the space available, and is well-oriented to the ad- jacent open space. The creation of on-site open space sufficient for the occupants is also an asset. The project fulfills the goals of the comprehensive plan and redevelopment plan. The character of the proposed residential project, although not of the same scale, is in sufficient design compatibility with the existing character of the neighborhood so as not to detrimentally impact the area. Traffic generated at this lcoation can be handled adequately for the present "with proper alignn;ent of entrances and signing, and future improvements of 66th Street will further improve the traffic flow. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council approve the preliminary PUD plan and special use permit with the follow- ing stipulations: A. That all site lighting and signs conform to city standards; B. That all residential buildings be sprinklered for proper fire protection; C. That the street address and building identification systems be coordinated with the public safety depart- ment to insure proper protection. , 0 2. Preliminary Plat It is recommended that the city council approve the prelimin- ary plat with the following changes: -8- A. That the subdivision title be indicated on the plat; 0 B. That the size of the storm sewers be indicated; C. That all bearings and distances be shown; D. That the following easements be delineated: (1) 10 foot public utility easements on all sides (2) Water main easement of 15 feet from Rae Drive to Emerson Avenue over the existing 16 inch water main (3) 10 foot bikeway easement approved by staff, on or off of the applicant's property; 3. Street Vacations It is recommended that the city council approve the requested street vacations by adopting the attached resolution and receiving the street vacation petitions and setting public hearing dates on the street vacations. It is recommended that the city council also give first reading consideration to the attached transitory ordin- ance, relating to these street vacations. Planning Commission 'Recommendation The planning commission recommends the following actions with regard to this project: A. Approval of the PUD plan with the following stipulations: (1) That all site lighting and signs conform to city standards; (2) That the street address and building identification systems be coordinated with the public safety depart- ment to insure proper protection. B. Approval of preliminary plat with the following stipu- lations: (1) That the subdivision title be indicated on the plat. (2) That the size of the storm sewers be indicated. (3) That all bearings and distances be shown. (4) That all easements be delineated 1. 10 foot public utility easement on all sides. 2. Water main easement of 15 feet from Rae Drive to Emerson Avenue over the existing 16 inch water main. 3. 10 foot bikeway easement, acceptable to the staff, on or off the applicant's property. C. Approval of the vacation of a portion of 65th Street lying -9- north of Lot A, Silverwood Second Addition, and an • unnamed street easement on the applicant's property running between Rae Drive and Richfield Lake. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director Public Safety Director 0 v? I 0 T R A F F I C A N A L Y S I S Condominium Trip Generation Rate: 5.6 ADT per unit .3 per unit peak hour Total Generation: 515 ADT Peak Hour: 28 Trips Effecting on Surrounding Streets: Access Analysis Total Peak Hour Units % of 'Traffic Traffic Served Total Generation Cenprat-inn 1. 65th Street Entrance -26 28.3 145.7 7.9 2. Emerson,Avenue Entrance 8 8.7 44.8 2.4 3. West W66th Street Ent. 20 21.7 111.8 6.1 4. East W66th Street Ent. 8 8.7 44.8 2.4 5. Rae Drive Entrance 30 32.6 167.9 9.2 T O T A L 92 100.0 515.0 28.0 I! i G R O S S L A N D U S E A N A L Y S I S Percentage Previous Previous Min. Allowed Proposed o Proposal Percentage and Required S.F. S.F. 1. Gross Land Area 312,376 100 312;376 100 N/A 2. Net Land Area 261,490 100 261,490 100 N/A ?3. Gross Floor Area 104,964 34 155,358 50 69.6% Allowed 4. Open Space 217,519 70 252,229 81 69% Required 5. Livable Space 164,005 53 160,557 51 40% Required 6. Recreation Space 26,000 8 35,000 11 7% Required • 7. Car Spaces 134 Spac es 238 Spac es 92 Spaces Required 0 k I• 0 I I i i i e ? a a s it 3: W 1 W Lu W .s e t !i W SJ G Y . d6 g U3 W Y r z z 3 Is I n i ? = a LLZLL WpLL Z W W W ?7 ° F Z W F ? Vl¢>; CGS v Z sa N 6 ? A. _ Q , ' r 5 R ? 0 S ¢ W W ;3 W a W ? c ? - S y 2 1 0, /I / -? J ? tCs 7n a ay /L? iU3 bob cz? 1 O NOIlaOY OOONMWIS v` a i (FyO, /L /L Q \nb> 4` ' O 3 s T? z Ia I ar:r• ? I i i 3nN3Ar NOMOR WI C NoLaav ON033S OOOMtl3A-IIS 1 F 4?: `' my 1 w ' I• s I ??• ??_? WE9T 65TH" SLR ??\ SUM /o' I I I\ /Ir a \ i + f v e 3S `, Wes SN s o 3 3 " i a+ ?. i ?c YD i N ?•L OOe II3 Y ip ?? NONTM w r 8 V • i c < W a f N Q T a r \ r '? e W - J • /i ..-- .ttt - yr / iY 133WIS x:99 1S3M - ''` a c ? ! ?4J fg LL O' p ;1 p E s i U 9 ?? 6 kaf} all yY __ Ar`TiL - .4-rY h 0 3 k z t Y Y t I? li Z r I yf tEtM •Y? • w a S • u ? ? 4 ? 4n ?f 9L - ! 5= i • -: c •. ... ? .? .- _ I f .?. 1 _ I ? ? v r -?? 11 u ?; ? ?? f. x r ::: iJO ~ ? ? ?i ?~ ? • , ?? ? ? ^ ? I _? ? ?t x __ e J; ? ' ? u ? . I i . 1 ? ?r .? ? k ? s. J ? ?- \ ? ? r i ? N: ; ?; y ? ff N i ?1 S V ? i lV __._ ._ ?I ?j I ! _ _fi.a i ?i ? _} ?°---- --T ? ? c . ...-.i ,° "?? ?I !?{ u II ,?. ?i ?? ? W _ -= ?? ?_ _ ?, In u Y .b. 6 ° 5 Z ?? 1 ` ; y P C < W iJ :? .'. :? , . ` O? i t ? •i .. O ' ul u ? ? ` ? .? ?; - -1?? f ? •a o f a _ ??? ? ? ? ? IfI?/ _ ,f f iii ? i 1 F1S1? , : e' l .?='R _ { ? -.. _ ... _- - iz ,b i I' NI ?? ??I C O t W ?' O !j 2W 2 •i s g U - s y 3 g a 0 W ¦ 2 2 I 0 I _ ps 111 d August 22, 1979 295 BROADWAY AVENUE WINNIPEG, MANITOBA R3C OS4 CANADA TELEPHONE: (204) 956-0530 TELEX 07-57489 File Mr. P. Couglan, Fire Chief city of ."Richf ield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield,.Minnesota 55423 Re: Proposed Residential Property Woodlake School Property 66th Street West at Emerson Avenue Dear Sir: -:` In conjunction with our application to the City of Richfield for approval of our proposed condominium project on the subject prop- erty, we wish to request herein that the City ammend the existing Fire Zone classification that applies to this site. The site is presently in a Fire Zone No. 1, as are all the other residences in the immediate area, where normally the classifica- tion would be Fire Zone No. 3. The higher fire zones are unfair- - ly restrictive, and would prevent the project from being devel- oped. We therefore request that, with respect to the proposed develop- ment on the Wooalake School Property, the site and/or area be reclassified to Fire Zone No. 3. We would appreciate your favorable consideration to this request and look forward to your response. If you have any questions con- cerning the development, please feel free to ask us. Yours truly, DU S L M TED J. S. Stirton Development Coordinator cc: S., Ritter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING STREET VACATION PETITION AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk request- ing the vacation of a portion of West 65th Street described as follows: "All that portion of 65th Street lying between the northerly extensions of the easterly and westerly lines of Lot A Silverwood Second Addition." and; WHEREAS, said petition complies in all respects with the requirements of Richfield Ordinance Code 12.04, Subdivision 2. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AS FOLLOWS: 1. The petition for vacation of that portion of West 65th Street described above is received. 2. A public hearing on the street vacation in said petition shall be held on 0 -T ) in the council chambers beginning at 7:00 PM. 3. The Clerk is directed to publish notice of such hearing in the official newspaper of the City and post notice of said hearing in the manner provided by Richfield Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdivision 3. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of September, 1979. Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk ?J RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING STREET VACATION PETITION AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk requesting the vacation of a street easement described as follows: "Commencing at a point heretofore described as "Judicial Land- mark No. 14;" thence north 130 east 333.15 feet to point marked "Judicial Landmark No. 18;" thence continuing on an extension of said line a distance of 5.7 feet to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence north 770 west, a distance of 30 feet; thence north 130 east, a distance of 196.8 feet; thence south 770 east a distance of 30 feet; thence south 130 west, a distance of 196.8 feet to the point of beginning as shown in deed document No. 501976, Files of Registrar of Titles." WHEREAS, said petition complies in all respects with the require- ments of Richfield Ordinance Code 12.04, Subdivision 2. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AS FOLLOWS: 1. The petition for vacation of that portion of West 65th • Street described above is received. 2. A public hearing on the street vacation in said petition shall be held on 3. The City Clerk is directed to publish notice of such hearing in the official newspaper of the city and post notice of said hearing in the manner provided by Richfield Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdivision 3. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of September, 1979. ATTEST: Loren L. Law, Mayor Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk_ TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF WEST 65TH STREET CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The following portion of West 65th Street within the City of Richfield is hereby vacated: "All that portion of West 65th Street lying between the northerly extensions of the easterly and westerly lines of Lot A of Silverwood Second Addition." Section 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to take such action as is required to give effect to the vacation of the public right-of-way as provided in the foregoing Section 1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 1979. C? Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk • TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. • AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR VACATION OF A PORTION AN UNNAMED STREET EASEMENT NORTH OF RAE DRIVE AND SOUTH OF RICHFIELD LAKE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. The following described portion of an unnamed street easement is hereby vacated: "Commencing at a point heretofore described as "Judicial Landmark No. 14"; thence north 131 east 333.15 feet to point marked Judicial Landmark No. 18"; thence continuing on an extension of said line, a distance of 5.7 feet to the actual point of beginning of land to be described; thence north 770 west, a distance of 30 feet; thence north 131 east, a dis- tance of 196.8 feet; thence south 771 east, a distance of 30 feet; thence south 131 west, a distance of 196.8 feet to the point of beginning as shown in deed Document No. 501976, Files of Registrar of Titles." Section 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to take such action as is required to give effect to the vacation of the public right-of-way as provided in the foregoing Section 1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1979. Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk 0 • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manauer Council Letter No. 273 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request to Vacate Alley on Block 4, New Ford Town Addition We have received a petition requesting the vacation of an alley located on Block 4, New Ford Town Addition. The following items related to this request are attached to this council letter: 1. Petition and Map 2. Surrounding land use map 3. Transitory Ordinance The alley proposed to be vacated is 14 feet wide and 146 feet long. There is one buried cable and three telephone utility poles located within the alley right-of-way. There are no other utili- ties located on this alley. The residents at 6532-21st Avenue and 6533-20th Avenue use the alley for access to their garages. The petitioners are re- questing that the alley be vacated in such a way that the alley can be used as a private driveway for the two garages to which it pro- vides access. When the city vacates an alley, one-half of the alley right-of-way is returned to each abutting property owner. Staff Recommendation Since the petition has been signed by the owners of all prop- erty abutting the alley, it is the recommendation of the staff that the requested alley vacation be approved with the following stip- ulations: 1. That easements be granted to the utility companies (Northern States Power and Northwestern Bell Telephone Company) for the purpose of maintaining the existing utility poles and buried cable; 2. That access agreements be worked out between all parties to insure that proper access is maintained to the exist- Council Letter No. 273 -2- September 10, 1979 garages at 6533 20th Avenue and 6502 21st Avenue, since the existing driveway will overlap property lines if the alley is vacated. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission has recommended that the city council approve the vacation of this alley. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director 0 L? DPW 421-2 f? r PETITION FOR LOCAL IPiPRO'y EX,ENT City of Richfield, MN To: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Mirnesota. t Petition No. Cate Received e- I- 29 We, the Undersigned, owners of not less than 51, in `rortage of the real pre;erty abuttinc on ._ -_------__-?__ ___ _. hett•reen_______ -_ a11e - ..and her_-Ly petition that such 5t?X4 be xx -xx r:byt vacated. Signatures Gf Owners House No. '-- i i. } / i??+ f1( _ 'mac 5 `9 S' O g a ?3s-" i ?2 :r 19. ;Examined, checked, and found to be in proper Four and to be sigred by the required number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for. per cent Legal Descrii)tior of the Property ?'?` Uj o 3i22 4 21 IV ? It 5120 ? 21 1-7- LLJ Q 64th .04-1 24D400 ? e40, 124 1100 s 2 23 ? 04 ? 05 2 23 . ?0a 3 3 22• oe D 09 3 22 as 4 2i ? u ? ". 4 21- ?m 20 D 16 ? 17 20 1116 112-4 ? 21 0 7 18"- ? 25 7 18 D4 8 17 . ? ?a 11 29 8 ' 17 SO 9 1603-- ? 33 9 ---- 10 15 '`1136 [] 37 1015--- 4 II ? 40 ? 45 it 14 1140 1144 ? 44 11,900 12t13 - 65th 1 23 [ ? 01,, 1 23 ?co 2 22 C14 ? o5-.2 22 ?" 3 21.: ?' ° ? 09 3121 } 20 ?? ? i3 4i20 12 ? ie D 17 1 e 118 020 TTr. ? 2?, s is *-- 17 n24 V/ O ? 7 17 ED24 N 29 8 16 ED2e 33 9 15 E]3 I II 1 } I 1 192 , 3 22 PETITION MAP 4 2, p2 5.20 Law U 25 1124 W Q 0 29 8,17 1125 Q 71 33 9;16 D, a' 10'15 ?3F F-1 a 41 11 ,14 1140 ? 43 ?7 r1 44 3 22 4 21 O's 5.20 D20 21 ?2a = 1123 8 17 Q U 14, 24 z B 17 - Q D ` 9 16 [,'6 0 10 15 0-11 114 n4o 10 012 11:6 v 6 18 ?p N I 7 17 ??t (V 8 16 1132 ley 9 15 1136 10 111 12 1 14 21 2i ig M21 [45 371 ST ? Of 1 24 ?J ? 03 2 23'004 05 09 ? 3 22 ?Os 09 L 4 21 012 lz ? 5 20 C D 16 13 21 ? 20 zs ? 7 18 1128 23 C ? 8 17. ' 3o 2s C 3311 9 16 [132 3711 1915- 1156 ?: D 11 14 Doc j. C?-J 12 13 D 44 04, _ ST. ? " 1 23 of ? ? 05 2 22 1104 0311 . O9 3 21 1108 090 13 4 20 U) Lo 19 6 27 Q 7 8 16 9 15 11 1112113 14 10 Foi'- 22044 o:? o o SIGNATURES ON PETITION MEMI i I? 1 • u H 1 n 0 5 3 n N 3 A V is L Z «Z a m z cc -n O O G) ° N Y ° U Q O J Z m 3 O -? z O ? U ¢ ? Q O > LL i W 3 v/ Q z N of T M 0 f£ C7 0 N N t0 7 Q W r d A U N r W J J Q I?- ;vL-31 H 1 n o s 3 n N 3 A b 4i0 Z y d 0 a a> m 3 g, m ? co dQ U C O U y N ? O ° J W O V O LL N ? r C Y (0 a y d O rn a v co c d E m O. Q • TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 4, NEW FORD TOWN ADDITION CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: "Section 1. The following described alley is hereby vacated: The alley in Block 4, New Ford Town Addition lying between the east line of 20th Avenue extended and the west line of 21st Avenue extended. Section 2. This alley vacation shall not affect, destroy or interfere with the right of any person, corporation or municipality owning or having control of any electric, gas, telephone, sewer, water or other utility • to construct, reconstruct, operate, maintain, repair and remove any public utility facilities upon or within the vacated right-of-way." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: City Cler 1978. • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING ALLEY VACATION PETITION AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk request- ing the vacation of an alley easement described as follows: The alley in block 4, New Ford Town Addition, lying between the east line of 20th Avenue extended, and the west line of 21st Avenue extended. WHEREAS, said petition complies in all respects with the require- ments of Richfield Ordinance Code 12.04, Subdivision 2. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AS FOLLOWS: 1. The petition for vacation of that portion of block 4 of the New Ford Town Addition described above is received. 2. A public hearing on the alley vacation in said petition shall be held on October 9, 1979. • 3. The City Clerk is directed to publish notice of such hear- ing in the official newspaper of the city and post notice of said hearing in the manner provided by Richfield Ordinance Code Section 12.04, Subdivision 3. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of September, 1979. Loren L. Law, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 272 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Variance, 6507 Humboldt Avenue Mr. Jon Memmel, 6507 Humboldt Avenue, has applied for a vari- ance to reduce the required sideyard setback from 10 feet to 6 feet. This reduction in setback is requested to permit construct- ion of a second story addition to an existing one and one-half story dwelling with a six-foot sideyard setback. This dwelling is located in an area zoned for single family residential purposes. The following items are attached to this council letter: Petition and Map Site Plan Neighborhood Characteristics Elevations Zoning Ordinance Requirements 1. Section 3.30, subdivision 4, sets sideyard setback requirements. 2. Section 3.40, subdivision 6, sets three conditions that must be met for granting a variance. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed this variance request and found the following: 1. There are no special conditions affecting this par- ticular property. This is a typically sized lot and is not significantly different from any other resi- dential lot in Richfield. 2. Denial of the application would not preclude the ex- isting property use. 3. The proposed addition would be an improvement to the property and would be in character of the neighorhood. Council Letter No. 272 -2- September 10, 1979 0 Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the variance be denied because the proposal does not meet the three conditions which must be met in order for a variance to be granted. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission has recommended that the requested variance be granted. Respectfully submitted, L c , ? VL,I-:.'",Y' Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director . ? 9 r ' REQUEST FOR VARIANCE OF? /?? fN` ,/nr ?,e? ? /1- ? • FOR PURPOSE OF g(,t/?,;C S "? ?!? S,-ae2Y ffOl7iT-n?? Legal Description: C l U We, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above described, do hereby concur with the variance as requested. Signature of Owners Address Legal Description ')0,, J4 M" i 'Z?ul ? L 0, u d (GS? 0-0 Z??° A9- . 7 r u Zy '[ d r--? 2 2 ?3 2 t3 3 27 4, =--= PETITION MAP -- 2 6 5 3 . T- 24 7? - w B 9---- ?- - Q w t6 9 a r a 231 22 B 9 Q 10 10 o 21 10 11 14 u? 11 N (_l 2 11 12 ? t3 12 ? • n 1 h- 19 - 12 - j « 4 `t ?o' J l ? IB 13 , J 7- 14 210D ?D 4 D 2 = 3 D ?D 17 4 N (-1 16 I 5 N V 14 W 7 12 9 DY A ? rl 10 n J Po IB I g D ° 17 2 + 6 -Z - to 15 ? 4 N N - 14 5 n ° ----i3 16 D D 12 7 - C-? if 1 10 i 9 8 1 I'IB x'12 1 70E I?uc; Q. 20 I D ° ° u 19 2 Q ° a _ 18 3 0 UD 17 4 D? N 16 S EN 0 N D 15 6 d 0 D 14 7 N 13 8 ?p l u l2 9 m C, n t 11 10 • d A ST aD 20 1 D 1 2 18 3 F... uD 17 4 - 6 D -- O _ Z N? 5 - 16 El m 15 _ N ? I? N D U? --- _13 8 -D 9(E] 1 o ?,? it to a ST -D IB I a u 17 2 _ 0 16 3 06 -- _ U 1 ? 4 ' IA ND 14 5 Dc UD 13 6 D° ?D- 12 7 --Da r1 Ill I ? r I t_- 15!6 1612 1606 1600 o ? IB Nn „ 16 -D ? ''' 14 5 D ° u D 13 6 1, I o Boa 12 7 ?a 11 ?10 9 rte B- 1520 I' (' Toe n A V CN M 1 I N U N N I D~ i D-- ?. D ? A C? '. D Dp SIGNATURES ON PETITION u C ?J Site Plan H U M B O L D T A V E. S O. 6513 I 6507 6501 ? I I I to I I L M M 7 77 77 7 77 77 I 1' W I I> House I I (? Existing ?J. cc I g 6 "I ® I House d+-15? House I I *?--3p'-? • zO I I • Garage • N - I I ?--?? K 20 I i I I I I I Lot Size 10,189sq.ft. Scale: 1'l Equals 20' House Size 720sq ft. Richfield, Mn. • 0 Neighborhood Map 0 W z W W Q 65th S T R E E T 1 H 0 J 0 CIO L 66th S T R E E T 11 Houses of 1 1/2 Stories or More +SS `!1111 ? ? V % V 7o?l _-110 ? ry--_Vic tv_(S_? v<? - - y.Pa?'oSrv s CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 271 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf ield Council Members: Subject: Request for Variance, 7232 Aldrich Avenue Mr. Homer Roetman, 7232 Aldrich Avenue, has applied for a variance to reduce an interior sideyard setback from 5 feet to..1.25 feet. This reduction in setback is requested to permit construction of a four foot extension to an existing eight foot porch. This dwelling is located in an area zoned for single family residential purposes. The following items are attached to this council letter: Petition and Map Site Plan Site and Adjacent Property Plan Zoning Ordinance Requirements 1. Section 3.30, subdivision 4, sets sideyard setback requirements of 5 feet for one story homes, so that a 10 foot distance is maintained between buildings. 2. Section 3.40, subdivision G, sets three conditions that must be met for granting a variance. Staff Findings The staff has reviewed this variance request and found the following: 1. Except for the difference in this lot elevation and that of the property to the north, there are no special conditions affecting this particular property. This is a typically sized lot and is not significantly different from any other lot in the, City of Richfield. 2. Denial of the application does not preclude the ex- isting single family property use. There are other ways of adding to the porch that would not require a Council Letter No. 271 -2- September 10, 1979 variance. For • addition to the and maintaining a variance. example, constructing the proposed east or west of the existing porch the present setback would not require 3. Although the proposed addition would be an improvement to the applicant's property, the proposed addition would create the following hazards to adjacent prop- erties: a. Surface water due to the slope of the property, drains at right angles to the property line. The proposed addition will cause an increase in the flow of water onto the adjacent property to the north. b. Fire hazard potentials could increase due to the closeness of adjacent buildings. C. Air circulation could be curtailed, because of the proximity of the proposed addition to existing buildings. d. The property values of adjacent properties will be affected negatively, which will have a negative impact on the entire neighborhood.. • e. The adjacent property owner may be inhibited from major future improvements to their properties. f. The existing retaining wall is not satisfactory for the proposed addition. The weight of the proposed addition and proximity to the railroad tie retaining wall may cause the wall to collapse. The collapsed wall would allow dirt and porch debris to fall onto the property to the north. Since the planning commission hearing on this request, the applicant has proposed to reduce the size of the proposed addition by two feet, which would create a 3.25 foot sideyard setback instead of the proposed 1.25 foot setback. The potential hazards to the north adjacent property previously discussed would still exist, even with this change. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the variance be denied because the proposal does not meet the three conditions necessary for granting a variance and, in particular, the proposal would have a negative impact on the adjacent home, neighborhood, and on the public health and welfare. Is Council Letter No. 271 -3- September 10, 1979 Planning Commission Recommendation_ • The planning commission has recommended that the requested variance be denied. Respectfully submitted, i Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director • 9 7 Legal Description: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE OF FOR PURPOSE OF We, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above described, do hereby concur with the variance as requested. r'; r • 0 4 N c ?O -fin 7 L,I rd l ? 2 ?o '3 ? 1 5 ?? N 7 - ? V Z 0 8 - -- 12. 9 -Q'- Q 10 ? l- D= th 241 f o ? 2? ? 21I - - - Q 19' ? 178 ? ? 16i9 ? rt 15;10 ? :; ?? - 14,11 13112 a LA- 0 U - 24,1 L-J 23'2 o ? 22.3 ° 187 D ' 178 169 ? 15 10 a ? 1411 ? a ?? 1312 ? Z a m - 24 1 JJ? ±?- 23- 2 22 3 ? 21 4 ? ? El ? 0 2015 1? L- IS i7 169 i N 15110 ? AI I ? , 2H 13 12 D° U cr- 0 a ? 24 1 ?23 2 ~o? 22 3 21 o 4- LO 5 N C9 6 N ?? 17 8 ?? ? 15 10' ? ? o ST. SIGNATURES ON PETITION F-- cr) • 0 v I N az W } u1 Z U I I w ? N ?- I I O C7 U Z ? 0 ~ a X .: w y a O N LO 0 ? n co O) l d N FE b ?g °' N N N w ? O O J 2 0 cr. I.t.l CL O x CL F- Z W U Q Q cu W H V / 0 N y l0 7 Q _d T d V I 3 n I a a -- --- O -ai- ------ . ?_ . . . U) N O 7 " 1 t F ° z 5 Q .. 4L co E 3 n l a a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ?I Garage I U) I I > I I ¢ I 0 > x 0 a a CL d H 0 U iv U 0 c J d ? C J J a d a 0 CL` ci 6 z C C m t V 0 N a? Q t v a cq ro N n n i CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 270 Agenda September 10, 1979 • The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Discussion of Consultant's Recommendations to SWSCC There is an item on the September 10, 1979 city council agenda providing for discussion of several issues currently pending before the Southwest Suburban Cable TV Commission. A copy of the consultant's report related to recommenda- tions for administration of any joint cable TV franchise is attached for council review. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja 1, 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Southwest Suburban Cable Commission FROM: Anita Benda, Adrian Herbst SUBJECT: Continuing Administration of the Franchise DATE: August 22, 1979 After the franchise awards have been made, the work of administration and enforcement of the franchise ordinance begins. Franchise applicants should be notified in the Invitation for Applications of the franchising authorities' plans for handling the tasks. Further, the regulations of the State Cable Communications Board provide several standards that must be complied with, including the following: "A provision creating an advisory body to be appointed by the governing body of the,municipality to monitor the performance of the franchisee in executing the provisions of the franchise. The advisory body may be a joint under- taking of more than one municipality served by the same stem from a-single headend as long as at least one repre- • sentative from each municipality served is on the committee. to The advisory body shall submit an annual report to the municipality, to the cable communications system operator and to the Board, assessing the franchisee's performance according to the terms of the franchise and make recommendations to the municipality regarding the apparent or likely need for up- grading the system to meet the current state of the art; 2. Three months prior to the expiration of a franchise and to the expiration of a certificate of confirmation, the advisory body shall submit a report to the municipality which report shall include a written'appraisal of the performance of the franchisee over the entire length of the franchise with regard to the provisions of the franchise. The report shall also include recommendations for revised or additional provisions of the franchise, considering at least the following items: Channel capacity, channels for access cablecasting; facilities and staff assistance available for access cablecasting; two-way capability; and the need for further service to be extended within the franchised area based upon a reassessment of the communications needs of the municipality in relation to the services generally offered by the cable industry. A copy of the report shall be sent, within 10 days of its submission to the franchising authority, to the cable communications system operator and to the Board. A provision indicating by title the office or officer of the municipality that is responsible for the continuing admin- istration of the franchise." (underlining added) enfo ther cowl with tion coor ther the Base for to h and of t each reso to a ar several alternatives as to how the administration and em Ent of the franchise ordinance should be structured. For example, co ld be an individual advisory body for each community. There be an administrator from each community. On the other hand, j int cable system this could result in overlapping and duplica- f ffort and not necessarily provide for the continuity and na ion beneficial to all of the participating communities. Also, th n could be too many layers involved in the process of regulating an hise. on the assumption that there will be a joint cable system he five communities, it is our proposal that SWSCC determine ve his joint commission oversee the franchise's construction per tions and administer certain franchise duties. Membership e Commission would be expanded to include citizen representatives of co unity. The Commission would be empowered to employ necessary rce people (engineers, consultants, administrator, attorneys, etc) sis with the various duties. duties that would be applicable include the following: truction n 'tor franchisee's permit applications n 'tor construction progress to determine compliance with timetable nfor construction practices nfor "special installation" (public buildings, schools, etc.) 10 rec ive reports and information from franchisee re: proof-of-performance testing annual technical testing filings made by franchisee with agencies (certificate of confirmation application, comments on rulemakings, etc.) fiscal reports subscriber counts, complaints, service requests mon'tor franchisee's performance in access matters ass ss penalties al Re revIiew and penalties assessed new technologies and services system performance services provided programming offered complaints privacy line extension city and company operational rules access commitments report to councils on: rate structure franchise fee collection and disbursement 0 • Collect and disburse franchise fee Hear complaints Notify public of cable proceedings Advise cities on rate change proceedings, franchise assignment, etc. Participate in franchise renewals per state rules Monitor state and federal rules and law affecting franchise ordinances There will be continuing responsibilities of the individual governing bodies of the five communities that cannot be delegated. Those functions include the following: --approving the establishment of the Commission to perform the functions described above and authorizing the execution of the necessary joint powers agreement and modifications to ito --appointing representatives to serve. --review and comment to annual report of the Commission --issuing construction permits to the franchisee for the construction of the system within that community --administering franchise provisions unique to its community • --adopting ordinances for rate changes --re-negotiating the franchise ordinance --changing the franchise ordinance to comply with state and federal law. --various functions in the event of termination or default of the franchisee. The SWSCC is requested to determine the procedure for administration and enforcement as outlined above. This will then become part of the franchise ordinance now being developed by it. 11 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 269 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Comprehensive Plan and Report on Transportation Inventory Attached to this council letter is a copy of the transporta- tion inventory which is the last of five inventories that have been prepared to analyze existing conditions in Richfield as part of the comprehensive plan revision process. The findings of this and the other completed inventories, along with citizen input from neighborhood meetings and input from community leaders, are being used as base data for compiling the comprehensive plan and recomm- • endations related to the goals and policies component of that plan. The transportation inventory analyzes Richfield's total trans- portation system, including streets, alleys, parking and traffic control conditions,as well as transportation considerations rela- ted to pedestrians, bicyclists, and mass/public transportation. It is recommended that the city council receive this report and authorize its public use in the comprehensive planning process. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger\ City Manager KN/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director s d CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager 0 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000 Council Letter No. 268 9 Agenda September 10, 1979 Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that the city council must approve purchases of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction, when the amount exceeds $1,000. There is one such item on the September 10, 1979 city council agenda. Grass Seed On August 27, 1979, the city council approved a purchase in excess of $1,000 to provide for use of a slightly different type • of grass seed than that originally proposed to be planted on the golf course site. At that time, we indicated to council members that we would likely be purchasing additional grass seed during the remainder of the fall season, as construction on the golf course site proceeded and we were able to complete additional seeding in conjunction with the construction process. There is an item on the September 10, 1979 city council agenda providing for the purchase of additional grass seed, to be used for overseeding var- ious areas of the golf course. Overseeding is a process whereby selected grass seeds are planted over an existing grass and turf area. The Richfield muni- cipal golf course was designed to provide as little turf disturb- ance as possible during the construction process, and a contract was awarded to provide for seeding of those areas which were dis- turbed during construction. Those areas are basically the playing surfaces, such as tees and greens, the travel lanes for equipment, and the areas disturbed during placement of the irrigation system. The remainder of the course site retains the original grasses found on the site. The overseeding program would introduce typical golf grasses to these areas, and would provide a compatible blend with the newly seeded areas to be completed by the contractor. Overseeding of the existing turf will enhance the playability of the golf course when it opens next summer. Grooming of the exist- ing turf areas is already in progress toward the goal of having the course ready for play in late July or early August, 1980. 0 ?' Council Letter No. 268 -2- September 10, 1979 Three quotations have been. received for bluegrass seed to be used in an overseeding program, from 0. M. Scott and Son, Turf Supply Company, and Elmac Landscaping, Inc. The low quotation to provide 4800 pounds of grass seed was received from O.M. Scott and Sons, in an amount of $1.87 per pound. It is proposed that the overseeding would be completed by existing city crews, using the overseeder equipment which was also approved for purchase by the city council on August 27, 1979. The overseeding process is one which will continue periodically during the life of the golf course, but is particularly significant in the initial stages of the course development, as we seek to achieve an immediately play- able surface. It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase of overseeding grass seed from O. M. Scott and Son, in the total amount of $8,976. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberg r City Manager KN/eja 0 cc: Park and Recreation Director Acting Finance Director 0 -3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager 1] Council Letter No. 267 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Special Use Permit, Academy of Holy Angels The Academy of Holy Angels has requested that the city council defer the hearing on their application for a special use permit to add a gymnasium/locker room facility to the existing school to the September 24, 1979 city council meeting. This item had orig- inally been scheduled for the September-10, 1979 agenda. The de- ferral is requested to provide additional time to finalize plans and resolve some of the remaining questions related to the proposed development which were discussed during the planning commission's review of this special use permit application in August. • However, Co-Principals of the Academy, Sister Susan Oeffling and Mr. Micheal Donlin, have requested an opportunity to appear at the September 10, 1979 city council meeting to discuss the public safety concerns raised with regard to the existing school building. Sister Susan and Mr. Donlin will be at the September 10, 1979 city council meeting to report on their efforts to im- prove the safety concerns related to the existing school. Respectfully submitted, ,y Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Public Safety Director Planning and Redevelopment Director CJ i FROM THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 9nG? •?a? 411 September 59 1979 Mr. Richard Brier Director of Planning City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Dear Mr. Brier: This letter is to request postponement of the City Council's consideration of Holy Angel's request for a Special Use Permit until the September 24th Council Meeting. I would still like, however, to appear before the Council at the September 10th meeting to explain our reasons for requesting postponement. Sincerely, t . - b Sister Susan Oeffling Principal 0 SSO/peh i \ 6600 NICOLLET AVENUE 0 WNNEAPOLIS, -ti1INNESOTA 55,123 . TELEPHONE 612.355.3762 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 266 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf ield Council Members: Subject: Richfield School District Capital Improvement Program The city is required, pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Plann- ing Act (Minnesota Statute 473.863), to review the Capital Improve- ment Program of Richfield Independent School District 280. A copy of that program is attached. In summary, the school district does not propose the construction of any buildings or other capital improvement projects or closing of any existing facilities during the next five years. The plann- ing commission reviewed this program at their August 28, 1979 meeting. It is recommended that the city council notify the Richfield School District and the Metropolitan Council that this school dis- trict Capital Improvement Program is consistent with city goals, policies and plans. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger - City Manager KN/eja cc: Planning and Redevelopment Director 0 Submitted To: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL R I C H F I E L D P U B L I C S C H O O L S Independent School District 280 7001 Harriet Avenue South Richfield MN 55423 , -? r t a . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM p 1980 - 1985 (Pursuant to Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act) MS 473.863 it .'$..:. .? v:'-:Tiq. ...... ...r .. , _ _ • TABLE OF CONTENTS t? Page ( INTRODUCTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 LIST OF CHARTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - 6 DATA ON FACILITIES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 - 8 Chart 1. Analysis of Facility Capacity through 1983-84------------- - 9 MAP OF SCHOOL DISTRICT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 SEWAGE DISPOSAL DATA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 ENROLLMENT DATE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 COOPERATION AND COORDINATION WITH OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND AGENCIES - - - - - - - - - - 13 Chart 2. Summary of Cooperation and Coordination with Other Agencies - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 - 16 FINANCIAL STATUS AND ABILITY OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES - - - - - - - 17 Chart 3. General Fund - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 Chart 4. Food Services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 Chart 5. Community Service Fund - - - - - - - - - - - 20 Chart 6. Capital Expenditure Fund - - - - - - - - - - 21 Chart 7. Building Construction Fund - - - - - - - - - 22 Chart 8. Debt Redemption Fund - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 . f; 0 INTRODUCTION 4 Independent School District 280, Richfield, Minnesota, presents the following material for review to the Metropolitan Council, adjacent school districts, and constituent local governmental units as required under Minnesota Statutes 473.863. Enrollment projections, facility capacity and condition data, anticipated program development, and possible school district cooperative efforts will indicate the School District is not anticipating a Capital • Improvement Project that will involve new building during the term of this report. The School District anticipates only school improvements to meet I handicapped codes, energy requirements, and preventive maintenance. Based upon current data and projections, it.is our assumption that present facilities and presently available municipal services will support the instructional program of the District through the 1984-85 school year. July, 1979 `.1 n L.J r • LIST OF CHARTS a Chart er Description of Charts Page Number Analysis of Facility Capacity through 1983-84------- ---- 9 Summary of Cooperation and Coordination with Other Agencies - - - - - - - - - - 14 - lb General Fund 18 Food Services - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 Community Service Fund - - - - - - - - - 20 Capital Expenditure Fund - - - - - - 21 Debt Redemption Fund - - - - - - - - - - 22 • 0 2 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITIES 0 In 1968 at our peak enrollment the District operated eleven schools: Y? one senior high, two junior highs, and eight elementaries. Based upon : projected enrollment figures and new fiscal limitations during the early 1970's a planning review format was established to examine facility needs on a long-term basis. The planning review required careful analysis of program, finances, facilities and a staging process for making decisions regarding overall program needs. As a result of these studies four elementary schools have been closed. Of our eight original elementary structures four are presently being used to house a K-5 elementary program. Two additional buildings are available. One is being leased to District #287 (Hennepin County Vocational Schools) for a special education program, the second is being utilized for community services • and storage. Two other buildings were closed and sold to private corporations and since razed. I% Our two former junior high facilities (7-9) are now used for housing a middle school program (6-9) and our senior high continues to function under a traditional 10-12 format. As stated previously, the closing of schools was accomplished as part of a long-range fiscal planning review which was initiated in 1972. The review required ongoing assessment of financial and program criteria with periodic updates. From this assessment recommendations for program adjustments were .% formulated and the information was presented to the superintendent, who, in turn, submitted recommendations to the Board of Education. i 3 r V t .1% The cri eria used in determining the possible closing of schools were as follows: 1. Lon -range enrollment projections 2. 3• 4. 5• 6. 7• Fis al projections Ope ations budget savings (utilities, maintenance, special staff) Opt mum school size a. rooms available b. support areas c. size of rooms Loc tion Fut re program expectations Phy ical condition The closing of schools has not been an easy task; community feelings, tradition, neighborhoods, continuity of staffing, and year-to-year speculation have all impacted the ongoing responsibility for maintaining an educational program. How, ver, recognizing the need for early examination and thus allowing for long- -erm planning has minimized community concern. The District has been able to examine long-term program needs while exploring sch of facility needs and thus has matched instructional planning with facility rga ization. These two aspects of school management were adjusted and adopt d c ncurrently and resulted in a smooth transition in the interest of studen s, arents and staff. Continui g to examine enrollment projections and program needs, the present facility lan`is estimated to be consistent with instructional plans through 1982-83. Red ced enrollment in our present facilities will accommodate the expansion of pecialized program needs (i.e., science, SLBP, teacher planning, etc.) and pro ide for comprehensive instructional opportunities for students. i • 0 4 Future options beyond 1982-83 may be to consider a K-4, 5-8, 9-12 grade structure, but this would only occur if it could be demonstrated that . significant money savings would be realized and that program quality could be maintained. The ability of the District to support such a plan within identified fiscal restrictions would, of course, be a strong factor in adjusting its facility and program organization. I The Richfield Schools recognized many years ago the need to examine facility needs in conjunction with a systematic fiscal study process. Through such a plan and with the need to make adjustments due to declining enrollment and limitations placed on local funding the District has been able to develop a plan for facility utilization consistent with its educational program. However, it is well recognized that the closing of buildings has been very disruptive to many elements of the community. Neighborhoods have been modified in relation to their attendance areas, students have been shifted two and three times, staff members have also been moved, and the commitment to these efforts has had considerable impact on our primary responsibility for program organization and development for the children of the District. The organizational plan that has been adopted and the facilities identified to deliver the instructional program are seen as a reasonable approach through 1982-83. The focus of the District during this time can be on program development to meet the needs of students. While.there is projection for continued decline in enrollment, the range of student population within each structure is predicted to be cost efficient. Complementary program support facilities are needed in all buildings; therefore, as enrollment declines occur these areas can be created which will defer the 0 occurrence of surplus spaces at any level. 5 Ther disruptic to organi to examir i i a great need to stabilize the District after a long period of. due to a building closing focus. Planning has permitted the District its fiscal plan consistent with funding limitations, and is now needed t ese efforts and implement corresponding educational plans. E • 0 6 DATA ON FACILITIES Introduction This section of the report will cover the use, capacity, location and condition of school buildings, through 1984-85, along with the assumptions used in making that projection.- Each building was examined to verify capital outlay projects that might be needed and to determine the general conditon of the facility for educational purposes. Consistent with the legislative requirements, capital improvements were interpreted to refer to a project in excess of $200,000, not the sum of a number of projects exceeding $200,000. Special considerations regarding capacity The capacity of a school building can vary depending on the educational program it is required to house. Capacities established at the time our school buildings were constructed are higher than the "operational capacities" that developed as the educational program expanded. Assumptions for school capacity projections It was assumed that the present educational programs would persist over the next five years. r nnrI tic i nnc 0 All of the buildings currently being used for instruction are of an age and a conditon that allows them to continue to function for the foreseeable future. As student enrollment patterns change, geographical attendance boundaries will be adjusted to maintain even utilization rates at each school. 7 i N W H H U LL Z O d H d LL O W d.. } Q W } W f- N ON m Ln Lr\ Ln Ln I I I O ?O ?D Y Y Y Y L L L L L L L L L L C C C C C C C. C C C O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N f0 f9 fo fD f0 fo f0 fu fo f0 L r\ M ^ -,D I? I- -r N N 00 N Lf\ \.O t\ n rl- r- I Lf\ ?O ?D Lf\ Lfl I'D I OIOIO\Ol 01 m mm 0, m m 01\ -T 1- O -00 N O N co U\ _ LA Lf\ I'D LI\ Lf\ L11 U\ --T Lf\ Lf\ Ol 0% 0\ m m 01 0, m 01 Ol 4-+ 4-1 4-1 i-+ 41 d-J a.+ '0 4J N O N N N N N O N N N N N O N N T N L- U U U U U U U L U - • X X X X X X X N X fo W W W W W W W W LL. N co N Lf1 Lf\ O \D t` M M ^ N i? f- M N O O O O O O L L L U U U N N N N .C N N ^ •- 0 _0 fD S " S - • C -0 fu - - C C fo C L L M: X: C 4-+ '0 ro fu fo O N O O - L C-0 -W u C N N C - C O C L- N fll co U N ^ •- L N O 0 V) - W 3 U W J N u O.. co 8 N T rn ? f0 - •- L ^ O - +-+ •U N 4.- - 41 U C O •L - J-7 l.f N f6 U '0 O C fo ^ T CL N •U M L 4- 4 O - T co •C N E U 44 O U •L 41 L (n O 4- M O N 4-) N N fJ: N C cD - O .O ^ .a T T 6-1 C C N N L L L L ? u u Q1 0) C C - '0 ^ •7 m m O O O O .C U U N N T 7. L L fo fo + f J-j c C fU a) E E _U a) N fU .0 ? N N N N O O v U • 0 • • i C- U • Q Q Z U U Y H J I U LQL. LA- C) ••1 q C9 0? ? l NO NO 010 u101, Lo OLO r, C) Ln C M 010. 01010 kD C) LO 00 Lr) r? N OtD I- LnCO t0 0M I q Nq r? 10011\ r mw Mtn 1 1 co U') MLnw 1 MLO ^ 1 01 rr M 00 '1 r n N ^ 22 1 1- 0 010 tOO rO lOC NO 010 N toOLO lOOLo Lo OtO Ln c1 X001 OLOM qOn q Mq^ r- Olq com(n LOr\ 1 1 MLO tD ZzrLO 1 co Lo r 1 Ol rr N C? M r tD ct q L NO rO 100 00 r- CD 00 LoOt- qON 100 000 to LOM qOr- Ln LOr MOOT 22 ;1220 220101 01011 LO 00 1 1 MLorl d-LC) UT 1 ,LO 1 l 471 rr 22 q V N ;t M N 1 00 InO to MO NO NC tD0 O CD m MOO u)O0) d•00 )M MOIO QLn? O C 00 l222 Ol 220161 Ol Olr U- Lo kn m 1 1 ClO22 In u)01 1 ln M ?' r Ol 1 O 22 DO V ct• tD In to 1 tO 1o 0 0 0 • co 0 • 1? o q C 01 MC) MOO C) 00 IOOt` qlo l2') tOOM O1 Lnq MO1? rl 22 22 r 0101 r 010) O LO Lo O 1 1 v Lo 0) to LO O 1 Lr) Ln O 1 Ol rr r r r 1? 01 Gt N a) 22 i Lr)00 r-0 C - tOC Ln001 v0 N 010 q 0101 COr MOtn -:4- tnn d-00 pl LO to O r InCD r? Ol r O m Ol r tD Ln r 1 1 LO Lo r to LO N u) Ln r 1 01 rr - 2 r r r r U r co 7 M ^ ? N N b k9 1 n0 L/')O lnO r0 OO LO O MO 610 r t000 00 CD 00 to C) tD to O u)Or MLO M ?Oq :aO01 n CON 22 01 q q 61 O1 to In '- 1 to to r n Lc) M to Lo N tO Lr'f N I 01 Nr r r U r r r r 1 ? ? ? '9 C9 '? ? o 1 ?O 0)C r C) C L000) 000 NC NC I,CD L n 10 100 to 0101 r-I 022 C) Lo 01 BOO 00 Or- 00 LO Lo Lo C0 r, 01n p n NCO N M M r M M O W Ln O Ln LO r 1 LO LO r Ln LO O Ln LO r Ln Lr) r 01 Nr r r r r r r r .- U kD n r r O ? 0? ^ N I 010 ?C) q0 - kDO MO 1? O r,0 COq OON tnCD L. q0N LnO rl OM rLnN 000 to CN CO LO to 01001 1C) X001 r- M q M O 01 r O 01 r tD Ln r LO V) O 1 Ln LO r Ln Ln O ;f Lo Ln Ln r d• Lo 00 01 N r r r r .- r r r .- r Ln r- V' 22 r M q q In N 22 %D 1 I,O Loo CO tn0 ctC 0 CD Ln0 r0 ?C MO a' MO LO OON MCr d'tr)r? NCd• OOr I-- Lo V• NO V• LMOto to ON r- M v q r 0) N O 01 N to u) r Ln Lo O 1 k0 LO N U.) LO O LC) LO O LC) LO O v LO ON 01 r N r r r r r r r r r r r et n C9 L9 ? N N k9 toO CD NO ctO wC of (Y) O9 -IT CD 00 g0 OON ;10? M 001 NOC CD %D 01 LO t0 LoOr O u•)00 O1 LO0 22C1? wC) •7000 rl to22M rOlN rmN to LnN Lo for to LoM Ln Lnr Ln Lnr Lo for U-) LnO at N r r r r r r .- r V r r r M N V 01 t0 M r N •kt 1 t0 0 00 0 01 0 LO 0 00 0 O 0 000 N O O p 0 0 1- 0 N 010 ct NO to LDO o, MLn Lc) 00 01l -,t M M 01 Or N Lc) M N O v O O N ;r O q LO V' N M ? M tO LO Ln Ln M M O LO Ln r to Lo r %D Ln N tD Lo r Ln Ln 0 r- cli ? ? H 4 • 4J 4.1 • 4? N }) V 4J 41 J•) 4.1 z CCl Cn ca Ca Cn ca cn c L an ca r- CL W f a) a 0. Ev 10 a) 10 O_ Ev 10 a) 10 CL EU 10 a LO d EU .a a LO CL Su LO a) to 0. E u a) m 0l Ev IC O- 01 LO d a1 10 Cl a, 10 C1. J J r V .- U U r r V r r V r r LO r U a r U u . r U EU . r U EU m r U Ev .a r U O O r o. O r 4- p .& 4- O •& 4- o •'• 4- O r 4- O ••- 4- 0--4- O •r 4- O r 4- p r 4- ? L t1 O L CL O S.. a 0 L O_ O L O. O L Cl O L d O L Cl O L a o L GL O L a o Z C 7 C 3 C O C 7 C 3 C 3 c 3 C 3 C 7 C 7 C O W W L1 aA W D- 3Q W O_ °\\° W O. 34 W d of W 0_ 34 W a J2 W D_ oQ W d 34 W CL. 34 W d 34 r . 10 t Y di S.- CJ _ •? _ V 'V C 10 a) O 4 O p ' C O 10 • O O O N r o O V O to O J - • t O r 0 O Q) E O L E O E O 0 o E 0 o r r . . L a) C. 4- M +? a) t ? a) t +-) a1 L . Q) L - U . a1 r-+ a) t L a) t Q) U v•r U N • U N.- r• u U r V r u r V r • r r U r u u O r N S W E V) O ? £ l n 22 W l o u W L n 10 W N W W N S W W N L W N N W U- 1 L'i J Cl. In ' 9 V ? J O S U L CL W T? ?.L U '3AY HIt- '3AV ON£1 3AV HSHINVIS 3AV aHZZ 3AV !SIZ '3AV MOZ '3AY -161 M011119NO1 3AY HY033 '3AY Hlel 3AV HlLI 3AV N391 40IDNIW0OIO '3AY H151 '3AV HIVI 3AV Hl£t '3AY H1Z1 '3AY Will '3AV 14101 3AV 101113 3AY 09V3IH3 AV Snewnl03 '3AV MdVd 3AV ONVUVO IAlf 0NY11d0d 'S'3AV NIS S'3AV H19 ':AV NO1NI13 '3AV ad£ '3AV ONZ SN3A31S? '3AV ISI 3AV 1311031N [AV 1130SIYle I H1dOM1N3M IAY Adnesllld MY 1NVSV3ld '3AV ONVa9 '3AY 131davH 3AV 01313HYD '3AY 31YONAI '3AV HJINGIV 3AY 1NVAe9 '3AV %Y3103 '3AY lNOdn0 3AV N0Stl3W3 3AY 1NOW3d3 '3AV OdVdI9 AV lolosvInN 3AV 9NIASI 3AV s3wYf '3AY %ONM 3AV NV901 '3AY NV9eOW -3AY N01M9N '3AV d3AIlO '3AV NN3d '3AY N33n0 '3AV l'3ssnN !AV NVOtd3HS 3AY SVWOHI 3AY NOldn '3AV 1N33NIA 1Y NdnOHSVM 3AY S3%d3X '3AY 1180A 3AY H11NU id ONV3e '3AY N3M0H3 3AV 9NIM3 3AY 33NVd! 1 IA31A A311VA W W W W W W w W W W W W W u W W w )A r ? l r3 ? . l d u .o ? P Q-F' 1 P 0h ?O -0 7,9 ? = ? ?6 oQ- 3nON0 b I W yt _ '. z , <_ o _ - r I i 1 '. O - ? 6 Od 31dNVe 3AY M3d0 y~j N 3 3 V N N N N N N ? N N VI. ^ n C n n O Z b n r n n n n 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 i 3 3 3 3 3 JAI n.V7 '.AY t.'-INV15 O v 3AV .".'Z 3AV 1`IZ 3AV .107 JAI 11:0 3AV 41011101`101 ]AV UVJ33 3AV .:at 3AV .,Lt 'AV ..?I 3AV NOLONIWOOIe 3AV .ISI 3AY HIVt 3AY .1£1 I N321 3AV Hut 3AV ..Ot 3AY 101113 '31,V 09VDINI1 3AY SneWnl03 3AY Adrd '3AV ONYIAVO "3AV ONV1180d 3AY .19 3AY H1V '3AY NOINIl3 3AV OVE 3AY 342 3AY SN3A31S 3AY ast '3AY 1311031N '-TAY 1130SIVIS 3AV H1dCM1N3M 3AV AWIGSllld '3AY 1NYS131d 3AY ANYd9 '3AY 1318drtl 3AV 01313dV9 3AY 31VONAI 3AV H:1Id01V 3AV INVAde 3AY %Y 3103 3AY ;%Odno 3AY NOSd3W3 3AY 1NOVIRU '3AV OdVel9 3AV nouw H 3AV 9NIAW 3AY s3WYf 3AV XON)I 3AY NV901 3AY NY9dOW "3AY NOiN.3N 3AV H3All0 3AY NN3d '3AV N33f.0 '3AV 113SSnd '3A'.' NYOId3HS "3AV-SVWOHI '3AY Nolan '3AY 1N33NIA '3AY Ndn9HSVM -AV S3xd3% 3AV WdOA 3AV H11113Z '3AV 33NVd! • 0 0 10 SEWAGE DISPOSAL DATA All district owned buildings are served by the waste disposal system of the City of Richfield. No on-site facilities are owned and operated by the School District. The City of Richfield is a part of the Metro area waste disposal system. Waste water treatment facility is at Pigs-Eye Island. Sewage disposal needs through 1983-84, with the projected closings, will be less than currently used. i RICHFIELD SCHOOL DI_'TRICT -AGE OR PA ST CENSUS + ENFOLLMENT DHTR + FUTU'r.'E ENROLLMENT PROJECT I ONv GRA DE 7 -75 75-76 7r -77 77-70 1 U 70- ?JJ J ( J + 7?-:JO 'l '30-8 .". C•1 V` ., -• .'6.-"•l `.^._?. I:-. •J4 --- R ESE --- 0 ----- 34h ------ 335 ------ 409 ------ 409 ----- 357 --- + ------ ----- ------- ----- ----- HGSE 1 42 479 423 414 4 03 + E 2 10 . 452 479 422 •HISE 3 '5_•c 471 444 •_`'2 =»? 'HG,E --- 4 ------ --- SrJ6 ----- 5:?$ --- 443 421 ?:57 0 - - 4 ':374 --- 2 413 ------ 2141 ------ 2001 ----- 1 :t•$ -- + - -- .KIN --- ----- U ----- --- ---- ----- 545 ----- ------ 546 ------ ------ 493 ------ ------ 370 ------ ----- 327 --- --- + -- ---- 2 _:5 ----- 2r• 5 -- ----- 284 ----- 2AR ------ 24:= •G •c2 Sti3 4'314 457 -- .:4 --- + ------ 3, i10 ----- ^c t•1 ------- 24^ ------ 261 ----- 24r• - GR 2 514- 4'? •_ 47:3 47a 4:3:3 + 316 2.4 247 2.3 0 24 7 'GF; J 520 5"?_A 47 ` 4t•2 44-:. + 416 3. fl0 2i 0 2:i5 21v GR 4 517 512 4'?6 452 4 :7 + 420 33-_44 2'2` 4 256 222 -bR --- J ----- -- 5?35 ---- 51 0 ------ 4 ------ 4 r 5 ------ 44-= + 423 4 0r• '•:1 2' 7 5 243 -- ---- - t• '236 ---- c 5 _• 4 ------ c 4 •=b ------ ._ _• _• ------ ----- c ----- --- --- ------ ------ ----- r ? - ------- • 5 142 ----- 1257 ------ 115 -K - --- 5. ----- --- :2:32 ----- 3100 ------ 9 ------ 270-' ------ 24-'2 ----- +- -- 21x•0 ---- 1'9 10 ------- 170' ------ 1525 ----- 44^c'? .GR 6 616 2 493 472 45` - + ------ 427 ----- 4 C J'-=' ------- 391 ----- -?67 ------ 205 -1= F' ' --- 7 ----- ---- ----- G 4 3 ------ ?? 10 ------ 491 ------ 4 7 '? ----- + --- 4 53 --- 4 3 '3' 414 _? ?•9C ?-. J(C - --- . ----- --- ; i? 2 ----- ° `.: " 5 ------ 110;' J ------ 9 J 3 ------ ? 3, 1 ----- + --- --- _•? _•5 ----- ----- 341 ------- u5 ----- •7 6 3 ------- 0?:7 •GR 8 718 6.7 ~•J'J 59rJ 504 + - 47:3 ----- 457 ------- 4:32 ------ 413 ----- 395 --- ----- -- 7 ' ---- _7 ------ ------ ------ 16 ----- --- ?` - 4 7 475 44 42'3 $ - --- 9 ------ --- 519 ---- 14`9 ------ 13r•O ------ ic59 ------ 1116 ----- + --- ----- 9'=, S ------ ----- 954 --- ------- 907 ----- c6c ------ :324 6 - --- 9 ----- -- •0_•11 ---- `I•r•4 ------ 246'? ------ ------ 2047 ----- ? --- 1:: ---- - -- 17'45 -- ------- 1712% ----- 1625 ------ 1451 -GF; 1 U 7c:3 7'39 731 72 0 r'45 + - 597 --- 504 ------- -4 __ 2- ----- 4r• 0 ------ 4;.;5 GF; 11 x:26 763 777 715 J72 + O0o 501 473 •353 432 i?R - 12 - - _ JcJ Jc7 756 7J2 FJr 6 + 1 •`'69 5-7 444 4'=` 10 0 - - 1 2 12 1437 c.:.?J9 cc =••? 2167 1993 + i •J,?4 14..,4 14•_ 2 1 J J7 1 X92 -------- -- ---------------------------------------------------------- k; - 12 4S0 8153 7662 7091 64,•2 + 5377 533'? 4'103 4507 412c -------- i__i ----------------------------------------------------------- PupaAed b?y InSonmati-on Systems 066ice on Novembe,,L 6, f918 12 • COOPERATION AND COORDINATION WITH OTHER SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND AGENCIES z The Richfield School Board and administration have demonstrated their willingness to explore and cooperate in joint ventures. This is not a new concept for the District as is evidenced by significant cooperative agencies such as TIES, District 287 and South Hennepin Vocational Technical Center. Initiating discussions with neighboring school districts was facilitated by ECSU at the EPTF meetings and continued by the Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, and Richfield school districts (B.E.E.R.). Although coordination and cooperation is a viable alternative to reducing costs for educational programs and services, endorsement and support is slowly evolving. Cooperation with other school districts will depend upon the provision for continued local autonomy in the areas of programs and services, financial feasibility, i.e., the potential to save or maximize money over five years, and possible acceptance by community, administration, staff, and students. The District will continue to explore areas in which to cooperate and will assess on,an annual basis the feasibility of alternatives. The School District has cooperated and coordinated activities with the City of Richfield Park and Recreation Department on summer programs. Numerous • community service organizations and others (churches, clubs, etc.) utilize available excess District facilities. Portland Elementary School houses programs offered by District 287 on a long-term aareement with the District. Future Plans for Coordination and Cooperation The Richfield School District will continue coordination and cooperation with agencies where activities have been successful and rewarding in the past. The District will continue participation in the ECSU and other agencies which sponsor and support cooperation. 13 LJ % L N O u c 4- c O •C (6 •- O c 4-+ 4? 4•.f 0 a u a N O N fu f6 u u Q Q N W U Z uJ C3 Q LLJ •aO 2 t- N r}i' 3 CC ? Z Q E O U •N f- Q _.B fly O O Z Z O Q LL CL O O C..) N C O L.f U •L -zr N N ' •L O 0 N JJ 4- M C 0 N L. CO LL N JJ C E 0 ? L N O 'O L- N L C O f0 'C N 3 fD N CL 41 m o 41 T X C c L •- N ? ? •L N fD L CL E CL C) fU L- 0 O (n O C •- L ^ fl) L - a N a a u a .O E aJ a E fU 0- - v fD - C fD m I C C 41 O fll I u 4- E N L- E U 4-+ 0 a-+ L N N • L C) = C t c a c O 41 4- O ;- E c O 4-J a 4- 0 4-+ 3 E •- c O rn f6 0 N O T c +-+ N U N- E L 4.+ L- E •- N C71 (1) (D L •-) 0 U C) N - C C L 1.i fB C 3 a c 0 0 c a- a) -0 (A '? •- 17 U 3 'C U C p L ra rn c 0 •- fU 3 s? L- f6 C C 3 L O .C 4J U L CL a fD •- LL Q- :> i-) (n V) F- N O 3 N L N ? fll 4- 0 > fD O " C L N CL O 0- .- O -, 4 . ^ u 4-J N f0 N c C U L ?c fu O - 3 U E 4- O fD +J - • -C .L] L- fD L . C m fo v fli a N ?- C 0 O fr U M 4- O c O 1 L?f0 0 s- o a) •- • U n. -C L. O C O U U N 4- N a v 3 C +.J 4-• t 1.1 f0 N O N - C .C C 0 O 3 O C N O 0 i f L i+ ._ a , o fD N L- aC fD 3 O a •- '- a 13r-- O - J f0 U C c O O •- rn? Q fD U 3 C ? W N 4- fD ^ O L- fp N •- O v fD Z U a N U a•-f 1 N C fll C E O N L J..t ^ f6 f0 1 au --T fl) 3 M Cl Lu 3 fU rD 4? - J O f0 4J U fn u •- N ^ v a .n c N 3 fD `i a- 41 C fD i.1 3 N C O U fD C r. 0(-) _ fr rnw N N cC C O N ?+ -C > C C 4-j (U •D fD N U 3 N N i-f fU N L L N N U N O - c - U > 4- 0 4- 4-J 0 L .- L C a..f >- fll L d-) O u 41 >. C) 4-J a N N •- N •- ^ C C X a - +•) 4- C •- - N 0 X o ro 4- 3 E -- E N I L N -w fD N N O L U L 4- N N L- +-J fU m4? 0 c N v -fD N O N 0--a C N fu = fD c 0 0 m e 0 N U to M. - U U O fD U Q C d L• T 1 E -- O N U -W CD •-• C JJ Im N L 3 L Z N N C - L C N 4- C) o O C 3 3 C O • - •_ O O L- -C fll N - E C z _ L J.j N> N E 3 Q) - C a 3 +-+ c O LL N E N fD C - •-n c 0 U cn c c .fD fu U C •- T N •- E 3 0 3 4- C C O L- L- C. N C L L. 1.1 U ^ C " N C •--• -C +J 3 C) -C fD N •- (n m L N C) 4-1 N^ O 0 + + v q) +1 .- C a) _0 L. O a -? L c -0 C 4- N •- > 3 3 .. X 0- 7 - ) 4- N C •- 4•1 - - N -N 4) (D O > -0 fD fD •- -0 N C) (1) L- T -0 N LL- 0 3 +-) fD ^ C N ^ O N N O L- JJ N ^ L L n N •- c N - > 4-1 CL 4?- 0- V) CL 4-J ?J 01 4J Q) C a L 4- O N -0 ^ 3 U 3 Ly- 4- 0 X 3 •- L(1) O O C W L. O . L. .- L$-- .- LLJ fn L!) CL 3 F- ,-+ fD L 0 >- •- -0 -- O N N N C C O U 3 3 C c .C fll C¢ •- O U O flJ Q) +••f •- +-+ U 0 ,J fD u 'D - 3> 3 L. T ..C N N^ LL) fD LLJ fD O L- u fD a? O L- Q c -- 3: c E u -0 4J N4? Q 7 -- (D C 7 'C c -a C ^ N O Q -) fD O C O w O w 4-J +-) C M U fD C) ^ ^ C) ^ ^ O. qQ?? L C C a.+ C u C) C C fU O C N O L E C o •- fD •- y- 3 0 -_ _- 4-. T O 0- L E C L •- E L 4- E L. 4- 0 O N 0 W N O a.t 7 o N 0 •- t O •- -C L- ^ c L- c a) -c fD E 0 fD u 0 fD u O a-C ++ c 3 O E ul > L .- --- L .- - E O O aJ L- 3 L- O n .- co a w co CL w N W "J r- = O Q f•- C-) -,-n -M 14 N • 3 fD L fD N L O i.J C L 0 L N .C a.+ O -C 3 O iJ 1 C O 4-1 O C a) U L- N O . N ++ C C O fll u E U CL 4? fD 0 U (D L a) fD > a) N O • -C 3 ..C 4? E T U a) =1 LJ 4-J M - N C C U ^ 4-f 0 •- U C a _ L fD O N J.1 L 4- •- U fD 3 ?+ U N U ^ U (D •- c fo c ^ 0 (A L- fo a).- L- O m c 2J L .- fD U O1 O N N •- C N - •- N N ^ 41 Q) O •U a N 3 L 3 .-) O a ^ N a N L r0 N ?+ +.J 4-J C C t c fD C O 0 - -a O E 4... 0 N N N C N •- O u ^ O a 3 N aD a- M U 4-J N O N L L L - fD Q1 • L U C 4-0 3 .- 4- N L N > 4 = 0 J - O fD - N r ? D N >fll .- fD L 4- N O - f0 a • 0 U ^ u U N u a0.0 au N N 4 U N fD NM-:,: U ' o m O a- Lr i-) L 4-- (Q CL N C C Q) 7 O Q) -a U u O -- E a) N u ^ .C Q) Q) L m d N N - C Q) m • (o - 0) - ? 0 • • O 3 L C L >. •- > O (U m L O L 4) O Q) 4 ? m c D O (o O N L C N O Q) L a) Q) Q) m N L- 4J -C N m m C O L C O c a N u 4 C ( n • "O c U N = m •- m N Q) N- E N a) N N E u a) Un c 41 y-1 a-+ E 4+ E m Q) 4) 4? 'O +-1 -0 m N _C (A a) N N r- a) - U N '0 (D > Q) c 0) Q) M U •-) u a u a a) v u 0 u o 0 E O Q) U a) u E U E ac •- u L U •- t O ,J ¢ ¢ •- ¢ - N •- E ¢ a ¢ +? a s c 4- L C 1 C O 'o •- O a) a) 1 E C c L U E' m N N L (U C n •- c C C -- u 41 t a) O O O -- O c I t N c ^- L L > 41 c N O a O a) r-+ ? L. 3: ? a) O• 41 - 4- N m N m m e L. 3 0 .- t c 41 > c 4-J 41) 4-J 4J Q) 0 4J 3: • 4-J Q) m L. N •- L .- tT L L 4- N C fn u E C (o E O+ C O O v O N N O w •- •- •- N •- Qf a •- •- C a a a) N •D •- 4- L 1.1 - •?• L N iJ C N 4- a) N N 4.J 3 - m (1) C U i.+ y L (L) c 4.. -o C C •- O M C ++ .O •- C. z N •v a O u -0 'O m u m :3 m (D E- O N E E O w Q) c E O N C •- L m 1.1 4..1 L L .- - 4_ .- 7 7 U - .cm. C m > F- LL- (n N F- i- J (0 - 4-1 E C -o ?-+ •D w C 1 +) "O N (o • •- C N C O O O Q) C Q) a-+ . r. •p . L U m > N N - M S Q) a 4- .- L N 4- •- L. 4) E ? d F- > 4- > O Q) aJ O u O N • - Q) . - (A m 1- 0) C > u 4- •- .C > U U 0) U L c 3 L Q- Q) ++ Q) C Q) a) •- - > •- Q) M C 41 a) a Q) 'O .+ >- Z' O t a+ C E 7 C a) U 4J > Q) ? U N' -v p • C d O M N - L • •_ m 4-J m u a) N •- N N -0 •- •_ N . O¢- N c C O . W (A L C 4- Q). L N -p r-+ 4- N C o ++ c 4J O 4- a) L- Q) 4- L (q a-+ a) U 4- Q) m > m C O • ¢ 4-) > +- 'O L . Q) c c m -o •- N O (o u a) u - O Z 4- 4- L 'D •- N N (L) L. 4J L. N ' • 4- • E U N V) - a) E m O O N c a rn N" N a) 'o U > +? 4-J > 4- N •- n 41 m v C . O - a -v U •- n L a N m +-+ a) O N N O m M a O N () f- c,:: 4) L Q) 0--- a) m (D m- X o Q) - a? a L ._ L +1 L 7 L ?' - .O Cn LL Q' O> L E U J a) U J m N to n •D U d. N 41 -D (v m CD > N a) (n U -0 7 t O u 4J Z +•) E >- U ¢ c Q) 7 1-i +-+ 0) O a) c Z _ C) I 4.) c -C t C U •- •. L (o ._ 1 0) m Olt L O •- u a a 0 L- u N c C C •- rn rn •- L M 0 Q) ¢ O O 4- v .- + -? o ++ .- O O -C •- •- 4-J L 4- .- d' U a 4- C 0) Q) +-? C C C •- •- L L m 7 U w N O m (U c L a) Q) O ?+ +? + N U ^ U M a • L. o N L N - O • (A •O Q) •- (U m m4-J +J •- C m • C) •_ O U N 4? L •- E Q) 7 L L+ U U m N C O a) L. O 4- rn C M C m u 4-+ U m 0 7 (n O m O) •- L O w a v a) c 9) N 7 L - N N u » a) N a m e 4- L 1 i m •- E 7 O L U r- -0 N 4? (1) -0 O N N •U C O- (A. .- > m 4J ^ ^ L N •- O w 'O 4? ._ > C N •- •- N C C C L N N w •D a fn •-- O '- '- c a) (o N N •- 0 " Q) 0 7 0 Q) L :2: Q) .C ?- > 7 7 - - L U •- Q N L Lr c N W •- O a N •- L (o L o 3 L :3 •-? a m o m •- C C- ^ m O 1 1 u a O O (1) O a ^ N L •-- n C •- a K a L m a Q) a) v 0--- -C > a •-- N L 7 4) a •- O m. m A E U Q) O L. a O c Cl. Y u a) (U Q) 41 a O-0 F••• E u W- N x C n (n H m O. (n N a.+ 4? C C L. c m c a) O .- v O E 4- O N 4J -? ^ L L C C Q) •- O ^ O n =5 N u C U +? ^ Q) N C 1 U O - (o Q) L L U C L Q) c u •- u 7 •- 4- Q) Ql •_ - 1 N Q) C N -0 > 4- L ¢ m> m u - •- (V m m -W r? u CL m V) 41 _0 00 :3 > Q) 0 (A C14 -0 0 L- 4.j 4-- m (U 1 u- a) c 2 0 u t 01) N (1) •-, O L X: E . - m u --C • - •- u n- O O a U N m L .- E (? L 41 c to fn O U V) L- (1) a 4J Q) u> O -- " m L E O N L N N L O m 7 U U Z U D: N O (n (n m 2 V) F- .- CV M LA 15 N w v Z w c? Q W S 1- O :3 3 C - Z U X: Q v ? Z N N ? F- O d' O ¢ U S U O Z ¢ z C)_ N W rl .O O U Ul% I M N CL K O 4- C O N ro 0 N c O iJ U •L N 0 •0 Q) •L 0 C) N 4-3 4- 0 c m I 0 a V) c O +; ro 1 ? 4• C a E n s ai L 7 ro 0 L 1_ > O - 41) 4? 0 a) > U U e U •- a) c O C dJ 1 4- (t7 •- (D ro m 4- i-) 4J " L. C 0 au a0•- a) 0 0 a L aJ U •? U O ro N U N U O L O ¢ tr Q U N U ai 4-.( u 0 4- 0 41 O N C +J O co ro U 41 C }J 0 0 C + E 0 CL 0 1- W •- ro U a a U E a Q •- (D N E 1 = O a L L a) N 4.1 4- u (1) (1) E 0 _ L •- N C c (D C N +-? 4-1 O O u iJ c N c o E ( + 4J - L a i 0 o a Ln +- ro E N•- - U C 4-•- -0 c ) • - O O 4- 4- L p N > 0 4- +1 4- 4J L aJ E 0 CL ro L. ro N O U r - • E iJ (D O ro 0 0 L I - (n a L.) -) a yJ 0) Q) N 1 L 4J ro 0 4. c E 4- U i 0 L- 4J 4- •_ ro ro T - O C O L- L -0 4J 0.4- (D 4. 0 •- - c -W • O N N a 4- ^ u •- - n •- Q) = O O ro a) 0 0 > O O a L +J N c L .- •- U ZT - c c ro 0 O ++ L o S ^ a) O U^ 4- U ro L 0) N a) c u m 4- Q) > • i.( C C U •- (n c ro 4- N C •- O •- a) •- 4- Q) a) O N > L- U (n dJ 0 > U U N 4-) L 0 • •- o - •- a) fu 0 a C > yJ a 4-J (n O L- (D c N U L > O a) c 4- Q) s (D O Q) 0 •- L- ^ I N O • a L c c O a N O O C 0 N (n •_ •- N Q) U ro 7 4? N -:e u C • N r0 _ N L .- (D N > L C L- - O> • 7 L 0 0 0 0 E 3 L- N 0 0 7 U 4J CL E a) . N N 0 O O c N a) L O U •- C C CO 0) iJ -W U - U C > c u 0 0) C C (D O - - • O1 C 0 0 0 0 ._ 4- L N ._ C - -0 4-; 4-1 0 N iJ 7 4J (D a 4J •- ro a) N .a 1- m > L L C U •- O c tn.0 0- 0 00 ^ a O N •- L 4- N •_ L • - 0 L U a. •- N a -- L 0 •- N C • L O ro .n 41 E •- > (D 1J L 1 c E L- U ro E O 4? T L v a) (D 4J L- -0 L ro O ro ro X: a 0 0) (U a -0 a E (D ^ T L U 0 4I c kA C a..- 0 O C •- 0 0' ZD (-1 aJ Q U (D N 0 E T c (D •- O c > 4- +J O L- c O ro •- a) - • - L 4-( N i••. (-.+ a) (D ^ ro fn a u 0 V) (D U W O 7 > U 4J : - O v•- w 0 .0 U W iJ v ?- W .? 0 O 4I i-) N co U a) •0 .- L C C 7 7 3 4-J 4- E - a) O N L. U •- O rn E O 0 L 'O .C 7 a) 41 U z 3 Ln a O p N c -a •- C +J (D (D E a yJ (1) •- U v U •- - L Q) iJ jJ E L N i- a •0 L 1 C ro O L U 4- 4-- Q) N O > O O 4- (n C N 0) c E •- + O 4- a) N "0 U 0 •- 0 -++ C•- - A U L .a ro e O •- 4- iJ ro O L- L- N L N .- 0- 4-J 0 Ln 0 O > tT • N (a 0 C cD -0 (D L- 4- M .- 0 (L) O N v) L U U E U a) aM: c 0 O c 0:: N Q - E Z ro l L- I N C) C O (n N - 4- rn M: 07 0 ¢ +T+ 0 ^ L - °- 1 O N •7 4J O (1) 4- 4J C ro 4? 0 U E N 4- i.( L C 0 •L C O O O •- +J 0 4- U C +J 0 •- •_ (D L 0 a 4? O^ C ai 0 ro 0 L > O 0 U N 7 •- O > N 0 -W ?J ,.C a) •_ L (D (D U C) 4- Cl. ^ N 1 O L 1 41 N ? D N 4- ^ (D u O O 0 •- O p L L c .C rn (D aJ O u X: N N Q 0.- 4-j L (D C ++ •- ro v, 0 U A-J ++ E O 0-- u O N •- .L N O L (V u Q a 4J - N 16 3 ro a) L ro 0 L I, 0 4 1 C L O L 0 .C 0 L 3 0 c O •0 .D ro c 0 U L Q) '0 Ln C e O E U U a iJ (D O Q) 0 L > 0 0 N 0 u ° }J E T U 0 7 4J +1 0) 0 C C U - 4+ O •- •u c: a L- ro O 0 4J L 4- ._ U (D 7 4J U N U ^ U ro c ro c ^ O O L. (a 0) L O 0)c++ L- •- ro u 0) O N N •- C N N 0 4. L- U - 7 U N O 4--1 CL C.) 3 L- Z •.n O a ^ 0 a .- N L ro 0 jJ iJ &j C C L ? C ro 0 0 0 0 •- -0 O E 4- 4J O an 0 u .,1 ^ L- L C (1) C 0 - O •--1 O a•7 N 0 jJ •- ZT ro L U ++ ^ 0 0 •- ro Q1 L L L L U c O aJ 7 °- 4- 0 N •0 > 4- L •0 0 ro ro +J 0 N aJ 4.+ ? T a O •- ro - u O U 41 U U L 0 ^ N (1) ro U Q O O a N (n M U to ^ N M ? Lfl l/l I1I u • 0 1 r Introduction FINANCIAL STATUS AND ABILITY OF THE. SCHOOL DISTRICT TO SUPPORT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS AND SERVICES The finance section describes the historical trend in School District revenues and expenditures for fiscal years 1974 to fiscal year 1978. This section also contains a description of forecasts, through 1985, for antici- pated revenue and expenditures. Forecasts are provided for the following operating funds: General Fund Food Services Fund Community Services Fund forecasts are also provided for the following non-operating funds: Capital Expenditure Fund Debt Redemption Fund .Because there is no actual Trust and Agency Fund, no forecasts were made for this fund. The School District levies the maximum allowed by law,•with the exception of Debt Redemption Levy. The operating funds of the District are basically established by the state per pupil aid figure plus the local "grandfather" levy allowed by law. I• 17 N. 4, Z M LL. ? J S ? U Z W CD :n 00 O'. r S O O S F- N W F' O z W a YC W 0 z Q N W Z W W U O N r. N } J Q Z Q O O) CD O N O to O O O 1 O LO O O O qr O %.0 O 00 to L V N ?t 4- !fi 64 bR N a) X C) LC) C\i (a O 00 O O i) ct O M to L' O a) I O LO Q) O) O M to to O L O O M N N ? ?• kA U bq Q) b4 ? O O O O N V Op t" O) O C (11 00 O) C to 7 O t O) LO to rn i N N O to to O O N ON t.f) to N 4- ? . . v bq M ct ti1 a) v W to C ro _ 3 N n t!') N O 00 v O o) N ct lD to _ co ro 1 C 01 Q1 LO O) O Cl) M t- rn co O) - O) r ro ? M U M Q) O C) O t17 ro O 00 O) N U O j P, C to to 4- r l O to n r O 00 LO n ON *Pr L M M b4 a) C tf) !t7 C ro E O In LO Cl) O n N l2 a) 0 C Ot C 0 C 41 ? N In t0 N C) O M C O n ti V + -t M M O w c a? ?s 4 1 O O O O O O O Cl) a) O) O O C7 i Iri to c to a) O M O N Q r, M N O) c fiS HT ro m M L v w w v _ a) O O C co tp LO M ro O ? M 00 w D C t Cl) Cl) O t0 ro n rn O N N Cl) E cr. O O) b R N r N N bA Q to tR L.L ? M n Cl) 00 n ?• M tT O) O n ^ V t O N co In a) IL to O O N t0 i t- cY O) v N O) O N N b4 _ i-) tq b4 b4 M t0 N N ^ r\ t0 r\ t0 to t•7 l0 M n w W 1 ct LO N L. N O N O to 4- n N CC) f? O ' O) N N M tfi _ fR 4, L C ro A0% b4 N Y (A S- S- 7 O 7 Q) Q d 41 U N u r U a C O N C 7 7 v a) U mm r C C V) CL C aj (v - X > CL CY > W r Em fY W CY m U 18 N Z O H d N N Q Z a1. J C W Z U' T a) r ' Z U CS N a) O i . i C O V co O L O ? a) N L O tF O L 41 co r fl C ro S- N S•- ro a) A 10 4) C a) E Q) R U ? 4- i a) 2 O r O 4-- U") t0 kA C a) 4J i ro O S- O to l! ) 64 r Y C) ? v S O C. W In U') M : a) L Of W Cl- O ++ C a) E C ea E v i ) 0, ro i 1 fR w tf) l0 C ^ ) C to 4J C ' a) 7 O• W 0 0 . L c Q) 4-3 c 3 'o Q C a) > (a O O V by N W ^ ns L C 7 4- .n 7 N (1) O ro a) 7 Y to O O N 10 •v C 7 iJ ro v 41 +J M w O) O N 7 CL a) E N C O i-t +J a 41 O . U- C C •C ro 7 U ro V a O M O 7 c O > O S V ar •r•) O1. CL a) .n 3 E L +t Q) •o aJ L qq??• E ro • to a) .a ro 7 C ro ro •U C ro C a) E O U ? L o '4- v a) N ? 3 v v. L 4J ro C ++ c 3 C) U c •O a) a? U X a) +1 W E O L 4- 'o ro LA 7 v+ tT C ro v v E i r O L O o ro O c ro U to C O + R E dJ U L +? n - o +? L tT ? a ; r C a) 3 O v c ro c ro 7 E S O 4 to O i 7 c 7 V) N C a) - L F-- •Q .- 7 d U r O U li O Q !? a1 L H N f1 X W I• I`. I• lf) co Ol r CD F- U) W p Z Li p ? Z N LJ V x = j LLJ U W p Cn Z Q 0 (/) C) W O =) U- Z Lit Lli LL O N t-4 N J Q Z Q Lr\ o O o co CO M CD M 1 C C O Ol ? O CO M O M N n Lt\ N L(1 L(? L.f\ Vll _. L O1 O ON 00 O co O -_r 4- CO C OO O1 M O 00 00 C) 00 m u O1 r\ Lf\ N N C Ll1 U1 L? ?' (0 v> yr </r 3 O M ?0 O ?D O1 (6 00 \.0 O I-O N 1 CO O C0 N O ^ C co - c -? _ - • Ql 00 U1 M O ? L(\ U1 t/} -T (0 u CD \JO co 000 O O C) u O O \0 N 4- n r? O l0 O Ol 00 LA M 1,0 L(1 L!? i/T M L i!f IV)- V) O n E Z 00 W O CO Lf* Cl I M O M \.O (D r-i C) ^ O • s F- co O r- M LA d-' [1 O, am U,\ M M LJ1 Lf1 N• M 0 =D t/> t/>- t/> + Ln Ln C)) Q ? O LJ1 O LIB \.O p 00 U1 O Lf\ 4 z 1 C N (0 O n M O M N N m m. %10 M O L C/7 1.f1 L(1 VII M L L J th VT LT u U CT ?, C C) CD -a w n O O O N u N I O O O •- CO ^ C) ^ ^ ^ p Q I` co Lr\ M Ol N O Ol co %.0 N 4- O Lf\ L(1 t/)• N 11 C (D E 00 00 O 00 _ I- N Ln n N N I -7' -7 m r- a' O Q N t\ M 00 Ll.. L CSC O _r L!1 _ N LA t/> N N tR N t/> '? T L O L u o I\ N M O •- ? Lf1 (? ? ?- L L 1 M Ol c vi n. ?0 O n O M 4-+ L 01 O %.0 m O \.O LI1 t/) 4- Olto co t\ t\ O X \JD co cu I\ N O1 M r? N +-? I O ^ t\ L\ M 7 O (Tl L(1 Lf\ L> vs yr l/) 4.J •- N C +? > O u L I •- N E N a) 4-j u 4 4- L o to u m c to c to E N 'O C c O L 7 ?-- •-) U > M LJ 7 d 7 E m -0 C O L 4- O LA- X ?-+ m 7 in Q 7 Cr F- W m U 19 +v . 7 C N N L N u L N N 0 O LL CA C (0 O L u 'O L 0 rn c tn N L u C T ID •d-J C (6 to 7 N to 0 fD c 0) M c E iJ (J L L O =3 Q. 41 d 19 Ul 0 I •- 4- Gl N N to 3 N N C N c 3 7 4- y Q) -C -C D Z LL W LO U Q LU 2 N U F-- Z O U LC) co cn r C.D O 2 H V) W F- im Z W a X W 0 Z Q U) W Z W W rY LL O N H N J Z Qi r\ O O1 j N O O N N 1 O O %.0 1.0 ^- 7 ^ O Lr\ OO M M T h h ? h zr CD M h 70 O N h 61 C O •- co h `.1 70 Lr1 O v7 T h h t/? h y} N N N 00 70 O N h O O O 01 01 X? lr1 N - 31 (? ?O h LT L} L} Lf N p Ln L11 ?O Xo O L!1 M 1 O O N h 01 70 Lr1 - C ?O p, - h U1 N U1 O N 00 70 O M ?O 00 I O O h N O 70 L; co ?D ._r N M try y} t? t/> O O CEO N M 00 O 00 I O C) - In Ol m h Lf1 M Ql ? h ? M O 01 O O O h O 00 N O I O O -T t.(1 00 h h W 0O OO cn -? M i/T h - 17? 00 N h \.O h Ol tb 1 M O Lr\ h 00 h h ?O 01 O m Ul O it yr h N O N O h Lr1 L11 O tT ?O O -T N O h ? ? M M Ql N O N N M M i/)- L> N 4j)- \D h I O O O O N lr1 ? h _ ? v N v C a) LA 7 > N L. LL 1 •- U O a) - N C 7 4- L -O to U c0 (0 C to E a) C U C N C O-C U L- (0 7 (D > (? L L a 7 - E m N L V- O X (0 7 ? f- W m U 20 L- 0 N U C N 3 O (D CT C (0 7 U 19 U 4- O L C C m E O _C N O 4J M C 4J N L N O C ca .L U -p N C E N Q L LL (0 ? m T .p L L O O U •- L L CL L. i+ O 4- N N U x ?. ru yr i..+ 4- N O 1.7 .- C ++ E (1u) 41 ?- tn 7 O U ? C Q 7 V) Z_ O . 4 H d O N Cn Q Z O LL W U W V) } i- Z O c O U C L O a a 7 to 4- N to U .l? 3 C 7 lx. u L N N •C 7 E E O U 0. • Z U71 COI r 2 G!S C) 2 H ? N Z W ? LJ_ W ex: t0 W 0-4 Cl. M X Q Z W W U • X Z W Q J W d- W U W d' LL- C N P- N J Q Z Q 4. , 1?_I Ln O 00 O I O OC> O tT O vs ? O 00 O 1 O M co O Cn O M N 00 c l 1 co N 00 Cn m co N 00 co O 1 O OO M Cn N N O 00 0 I O O 00 m Ol Ln 1.0 O ern co L- 1 LA n 00 m U-\ n n O 1 O 00 n %D co n co r? 00 n t\ ? M CJl 4A n 1? Cn i? N CS1 N i!T ?p U1 I? O co . O O O O O O O O O r\ O CT1 1? n C to 7 L LL. N N C to E (1) N C O t > rp L a O L t+- O m H (0 o m O M O O O O -? %lD C) C) O M O O O O O co Ol O O M O O O I? O ? A/)- CD co 1l- C) O -:r O O N O M il O N Ln \0 Vf ?O i!T L} O o m O O M O O N O C11 ? O U1 M ? LY ?Q v'r a? O Ln Cn 1? M (D O U'\ N O 00 t11 O U\ 1" ?D U1 V). O O -:r O O %.0 O O %, O 110 O 00 OO M I? O ?O ?0 M U1 M M <A V1 th O M O O n 0 Cl .o N C11 ?D O I? M v co m 00 -T Lf\ -' 1\ O N C O -7 Q1 CJ1 ^- t/} v t? N I - N N •a U _0 o U to a C CJ G r ?0 O L co a ? E to X t0 m W m U U ? N 21 I- 0 4- 4) U C c0 O m 4-- O C O 4J tQ 7 U t0 U 4- O L N C C E N L O 4J O C r0 N L Ul CJI C t0 L U 'O O t0 'C7 C E N Q N U- L N L O L- U O N •- L L a 0 L O ? 4- tl? O to a) ? X N N V- N O C U N to =1 O •- U 'D C Q 7 00 00 • t LO co S C7 O S F- p N Z W L.L. F O ? o--i Z W U a. p X W in S O Q U N C7 W Z: a-? Z p W .J ? to W S ? p U- C) N N J Q Z Q O W Q n. U H Z Q ~I H V Q O Z v c N In 7 > L LL- 1 •- N 4- L. -0 N U C C vl E cJ C L C: N C O L N 7 '- > ra >_ +-1 a D _ E (o N O X+ N 7 m cc: W m U ?p ? U •U Q) 22 N Z O r-, H a. O N N Q p Z LL Z O `-r t-- U O t-- N Z O U' C.'3 Z J r--e O CD v N a? m a u L C to N u m O Z • 0 4 ti U'7 cc r U' O F- L/) p w Z ? Z =D Li F 00 Z m Z F- W d a X z ? w U w m in • L-U Z !Y Q r N Co UJ LL) C Z w w li C N (n J Q Z Q t Lf\ p Lr Ln 00 O O C? Lr CD CO O ?D M Ql O ?D M M p )o N Co O N n I M C M co O O ^ M ?D m L.-\ O ? ci'r yr M `fl O ?D 00 M co Lf1 I O Ln N p ^ ^ 00 O N 1? Ol co \.O z vl- to N ?.p Lt _ L(N Q? ?O ' O N t\ O ^ CC) U"\ M N L11 O ^ N co ' O C O m CO C) O ^ CD ^ CT') - Ln Lf? C) ? u1 .o 1 ITC; 00 00 l O ^ n ) 61 1- O t\ C-) O O O O ' o O 0 O 0 O ^ ^ Ol N Lfl M C') Ql N - co _ O O1 O Ol 00 O t\ co Oo LIr ? ih I? t\ N 1 1? O ^ O M ^ ?. ^ t\ ? Ql M N .- Q? 10 ^ N ? ?p ? ? ' ?D O Ql M t\ 1 1\ O .. N ^ Lf1 f? ^ M O N CO 01 !- N O -7. O CC) ^ N ^ L} V) v O C L N (n 7 7 > L LL - • v 7 N +? L .- _0 N u i-+ 10. u C C VI C C ID N C O L L G cU L 4- O X ro 7 m W co L, N p u N 23 m co ?D Lll M M O N co (7i 00 co 1\ N N 1\ Lr ?O ?D t? LIB M t` Ql LIl N M r\ O Lf ? a t\ M L O 4- w u C 3 O ID 4- 0 C O /D 7 u tD u 4- O L N C C E N L U O? C 0 N L N m C ro s u _Q 41 ID "D C M E N tr Q ? LL. L O ? O ? T L O L L) O L L d ^ 4- O co Lf\ Ln 1? N X N rp 4- +u yl .. Q) u E U) 7 O - u ? C Q 7 10 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 265 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Tabulation of Bids, Minutes, and Award of Contract for Improvements to Lift Station #4 On August 9, 1979, the city manager opened bids for renovation and repair of lift station #4, in accordance with previous city council authorization. The acting public works director, planning and redevelopment director, engineer, and acting city clerk were also present at that bid opening. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for council review. The 1979 capital improvement program provides for renovation of Lift Station No. 4, located at 74th Street and 14th Avenue. The major components in this lift station are fully depreciated and need major repair. The project for which bids have been taken would pro- vide for replacement of the existing pumping mechanism. The replace- ment pump would be a submersible type, which is considerably more efficient than the existing pumping mechanism, as well as easier to maintain and repair. The proposed pumping equipment has the aesthetic advantage of being able to be placed underground. Two alternate bids were also requested. The first alternate pro- vided for a portable generator trailer mounted to be used for auxili- ary power at any of the four lift stations, in case of power failure. The second alternate bid provided for landscaping around the area. The landscaping of the lift station area was proposed to complement the landscaping around the entire ponding area which had been proposed as part of the Norby-Wilson storm drainage improvement project. Four bids were received for the lift station #4 improvement work. The low bid was submitted by F. F. Jedlicki, Inc., in the amount of $73,375. If the alternate bid for equipment were to be considered, which provides for substitution of Faribanks Moorse pumps in place of Flyght pumps, the bid of Overdahl Construction would be low bid, in the corrected base bid amount of $72,100. However, based on the avail- ability of Fairbanks Moorse parts with a local distributor, it is the recommendation of the acting public works director, in which I concur, that the low base bid of $73,375, reflecting the specified equipment, be awarded. Council Letter No. 265 -2- Agenda September 10, 1979 It is further recommended that the alternate bids for the mobile generator and the landscaping be rejected. The mobile generator is a piece of equipment which could be added at a future date, if it appears desirable. The landscaping plan proposed in the bid specifications called for extensive landscaping which would essentially curtain the entire lift station area, and would complement the proposed landscap- ing plan for the overall pond improvements. Since development of these bid specifications, the city council has taken action to delete the pond landscaping project from any drainage improvements to be under- taken in the area. Therefore, I believe that a modified landscaping plan would be most appropriate for the lift station, and would propose that such landscaping could be undertaken by city crews, out of operat- ing funds in subsequent years. • There is $42,000 appropriated from the sewer utility fund for this project in the 1979 capital budget. Because the ordering of pumps will delay implementation of the project until early 1980, and an ad- ditional $40,000 is anticipated in 1980 for lift station improvements, sufficient funds will be available in the 1979-80 combined capital im- provement program to cover the cost of the bid. In addition, it ap- pears that part of the cost of these improvements should be borne by the City of Bloomington, under terms of an old agreement between the cities of Richfield and Bloomington which permitted sewage from the Met- ropolitan Stadium site to flow into Richfield's sewer system. However, it is the opinion of the acting public works director and the city attorney, in which I concur, that the city council should award the bid for these lift station improvements at this time, and authorize the staff to continue researching the nature and extent of any cost-sharing obligations of the City of Bloomington. In summary, it is recommended that the city council award the bid to F.F. Jedlicki, Inc., in the amount of $73,375, for pump replacement and overall renovation of lift station #4. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN:jf cc: Acting Public Works Director Acting Finance Director City Attorney 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening August 9, 1979 Lift Station No. 4 Modifications and Appurtenant Work City Project No. 736. Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1915, a meeting of the administrative staff was called by Karl Nollenberger, City Manager, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for Lift Station No. 4 Modi- fications and Appurtenant Work as advertised in the official newspaper on August 1, and 8, 1979. Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager Marshall Raaen, Acting Public Works Director Art Bailey, Engineer Richard Krier, Planning & Redevelopment Directo Sylvia Bergh, Acting City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER AND BID SECURITY CJ ALTERNATES MOBILE LAND- ALTERNATE BASE BID GEN. SCAPE EQUIPMENT New Mech Companies Deduct B.B. 5% $88 ,000 $11,800 $20 ,000 $5000 Orvedahl Construction Deduct B.B. 5% 76 ,600 11,000 8, 880 4,500 G. L. Contracting, Inc. Deduct B.B. 5% 85, 720 12,000 9, 600 2,000 F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. B.B. 5% 73, 375 10, 500 The City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the August 13, 1979 city council meeting. Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk IqJ.ES 4 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 264 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Recommendation for Denial of Taxicab Driver's License • The city has received an application for a taxicab driver's license from Mr. Harley Moran Sorensen (AKS: Harley Korva). The background investigation conducted by the Public Safety Department with regard to this license application reveals that the applicant has four felony convictions. In September, 1955, the applicant was convicted of an attempted rape and burglary. In December, 1959, the applicant was convicted of indecent liberties and in August, 1962 the applicant was convicted of burglary. The applicant has completed his prison sentences on the con- victions involved and was discharged from parole in February, 1972. However, it is the opinion of the Public Safety Director that these convictions relate directly to the licensure which the applicant is seeking and are of such an unusually serious nature that the license should be denied. The city attorney's office concurs with this opinion. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council deny this taxicab drivers license application. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Public Safety Director Acting City Clerk City Attorney 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 263 Agenda September 10, 1979 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf ield Council Members: Subject: Volunteer Service Recognition Department of Public Safety There is an item scheduled on the September 10, 1979 city council agenda providing for council recognition of two long-term volunteer members of the Emergency Services of the Public Safety Department. Mr. Kenneth Nelson and Mr. Stuart Swanson are planning to retire this fall after 25 years of volunteer service with our Public Safety Department. Both gentlemen joined Richfield's Civil Defense Reserve organization in 1954. It would be impossible to estimate the number of actual man- hours contributed by these two individuals to the public safety effort in our community over the past 25 years. However, what can be said is that they have provided significant leadership in the operation of our reserve program. Mr. Nelson is currently the Inspector, or Senior Command Reserve Officer, of the Emergency Services Division. For the past several years he has coordinated and directed the activities of the 50 men and women serving the city in this voluntary effort. Mr. Swanson is currently a Reserve Captain in charge of the Medical Support Unit of the Emergency Services Division. Both of these individuals have served the City of Richfield in a dedicated and competent manner. Both the Public Safety Director and I feel that it is most fitting for the city council to recognize their contributions to Richfield's public safety effort prior to their retirement. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Public Safety Director