09-24-79 agenda
EXTRA ITEM
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 297
Agenda September 24,1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Contracts for Hotel/Motel Inspection
•
0
As a special item for the city council agenda on September
24, 1979, the public safety department has requested consideration
of an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the City of Rich-
field to take over all of the hotel/motel fire inspection responsi-
bilities. This item had originally been scheduled for council
consideration at the October 9, 1979 city council meeting. How-
ever, we were notified last Friday that the State of Minnesota
has moved the dates up for applying for participation in this
program. Therefore, the city council should consider this matter
at their September 24, 1979 city council meeting.
In return for transfer of this responsibility, the state will
allow members of our fire division to participate in the fire mar-
shall enforcement inspection training program offered by the State.
This is a three-week highly specialized training program dealing
with the provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. There will
be no tuition charged to the city for our participation in this
program and the city will be reimbursed for any direct cost in-
curred by employees who participate in the program.
This training program offered by the State as part of this
project would be an outstanding opportunity for a number of the
members of our fire division to receive formalized training in the
application of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. We do not feel that
this transfer of inspection responsibility for Hotels/Motels within
the city will create any additional workload on our fire division
since we are already conducting local inspections of these facil-
ities and presently there are only three (3) motels in the city.
It is the recommendation of the public safety director, in
which I concur, that the city council authorize the city manager
to enter into an agreement with the state of participate in this
program. A copy of the agreement is attached for your information.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
Page 1 of 3
State of Minnesota
0 CONTRACTUAL (non-state employee) Services
THIS CONTRACT, which shall be interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of Minnesota,
between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Public Safety (herein-
after STATE) and
address
Soc. Sec. or a en. No. (hereinafter
CONTRACTOR), witnesseth that:
WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant tb?Minnesota Statutes 1978, Section 299F.46, subdivision 2,
is empowered to enter into an agreement with any county, 2 or more contiguous counties
or city or other municipality, and WHEREAS, under which agreement the county(ies), city
or municipality may agree to perform all or part of the inspection duties set forth in
Minnesota Statute § 299F.46, subdivision 1 (1978), and WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR represents
that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein, NOW,
THEREFORE, it is agreed:
1. CONTRACTOR'S DUTIES.
1. Annually inspect every hotel within its jurisdiction and enforce the
provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code as it applies to those
facilities at no cost to the State.
2. Require all inspectors employed for the purposes of this contract to
• successfully complete the State Fire Marshal's Enforcement Inspection
Training program to be provided to the municipality at no cost.
3. Adopt ordinances establishing fire safety standards at least equiva-
lent to the minimum standards established by M.S. 299F.011 and the
rules promulgated thereunder, as such statutes and rules are amended
from time to time. The consultant may enact ordinances with more
stringent requirements.
4. Attach to the contract a certified copy of the municipality's fire
ordinance.
II. CONSIDERATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT.
A. Consideration for all services performed and goods or materials supplied
by CONTUC M pursuant to this contract shall be paid by the STATE as
follows:
Reimbursement for travel and subsistance expenses incurred by the
contractor at the following rates: Travel at 16t per mile;
lodging at $28.50 per night; and meals at $12.30 per day during
the three-week training period beginning October 29th 1979
and ending November 16th, 1979 . The state w reim urse the
contractor or the expenses of not more than
student(s). Total reimbursement not to excee even
Hundred Fifty Dollars) per student, or $
( ) tota . s contract may
be amended to allow reimbursement or training of additional
students subject to the availability of funds.
B. Terms of Payment
:'aye c or j
4
1. Payments shall be made by the STATE promptly after
CONTRACTOR'S presentation of claims for reimbursement
of expenses and acceptance of such claims by the
STATE'S authorized agent pursuant to Clause VI.
Claims shall be submitted in a form prescribed by
the STATE and according to the following schedule:
Upon completion of training.
III. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT., All services provided by CONTRACTOR pursuant to
this contract s a e performed to the satisfaction of the STATE, as
determined in the sole discretion of its authorized agent, and in accord
with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and
regulations.
IV. TERM OF CONTRACT. This contract shall be effective on ,
or upon.suc ate as it is executed as to encumbrance by the Conn ss oner
of Finance, whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until
or until all obligations set forth in this
contract ave een satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
V. CANCELLATION. This contract maybe cancelled by the STATE or CONTRACTOR
at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice
to the other party. In the event of such a cancellation CONTRACTOR
shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro.rata basis, for work
or services satisfactorily performed.
VI. STATE'S AUTHORIZED AGENT. The STATE'S authorized agent for the purposes
o administration of t s contract is Department of Public Safety. Such
agent shall have final authority for acceptance of CONTRACTOR'S services
and if such services are accepted as satisfactory, shall so certify on
each invoice submitted pursuant to Clause II, paragraph B. -
VII. ASSIGNMENT. CONTRACTOR shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or
obligati ons under this contract without the prior written consent of the
STATE.
VIII. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments to this contract shall be in writing.
IX. OTHER PROVISIONS.
1. The State will discontinue inspection and enforcement actions
in those facilities covered by the Agreement. The State will
provide, without cost to the Consultant, training and con-
sultation on problems. The State will provide, without cost
to the Consultant, consultation and advice on rules promulgated
by the State which are enforct-:d by the Consultant.
2. The State will annually review the Consultant's program to
determine its continued compliance with the Agreement. Annual
0
E
Page 3 of 3
review criteria include code interpretation, enforcement pro-
cedures, inspection results and frequency, records complete-
ness and staff training.
3. The Agreement shall continue to be effective until terminated
by either party in accordance with Section V. If the Consul-
tant's program is found by the State to be deficient, but under
conditions that do not endanger the fire safety of the community,
the State may continue the Agreement on a provisional status
for a specific time period.
4. The Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent of both
parties.
5. No Agreement shall be effective to transfer any tort liability
attributable to any inspection or lack of inspection from the
State to the local unit contracting to perform the inspection.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this contract to be duly executed intending
to be bound thereby.
APPROVED:
1. CONTRACTOR:
(If a corporation, two corporate officers
must execute.)
By :
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
As to form and execution by the
3. ATTORNEY GENERAL:
By:
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION:
4. By:
Authorized Signature
Date:
5. COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE:
ENCUMBERED
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
2. STATE AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT:
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Date :
White - Original - Finance Dept.
Canary - CONTRACTOR
Blue - Agency Acctg. Unit
Salmon - DEPT. OF ADMIN.
Pink - Agency Suspense Copy
Green - Work Copy
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 295
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Super America Station at 2913 West 66th Street
On December 11, 1978, the city council approved a special use
permit for a new Super America service station store at 2913 West
66th Street. Subsequently, soil tests done on the site have in-
dicated that poor soils exist on the site. The site will require
substantial soil replacement to provide a proper base for proposed
site improvements. This also requires that the buildings be
moved five feet west of the previously approved building location.
Five feet of the green area on the western edge of the site will
then be lost. This limits the space for the drainage swale and
the three foot high earth berm which were to occur within that
area. The three foot high earth berm was a council stipulation
to insure that adjacent residences are properly screened from
automobile headlights. This stipulation was requested by the
nearby neighbors. To accomplish this, Super America is proposing
to construct a berm which will be partially on city right-of-way.
A brick faced retaining wall will be constructed to allow sufficient
space adjacent to the street for future sidewalk construction.
The city staff recommends that the city council approve tkle
proposed changes and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to
execute a Hold Harmless Agreement (copy attached) with Super Amer-
ica. This agreement should hold the city harmless from any damages
if the retaining wall is damaged or has to be removed in the future
for any necessary public improvements within the public right-of-
way.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
4W cc: Planning & Redevelopment Director
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 24th day of
September, 1979, by and between the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter "City", and
Super America "Permittees",,
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Permittees are the owners of that parcel or tract of
land legally described as:
Lot Five (5), Four (4) and West 41.9 feet of Lot Three (3),
Block Seven (7), "Tingdale Bros. Lincoln Hills, Village of
Richfield, subject to the reservation of an easement for
ingress and egress across the following portion of the tract
hereby conveyed, namely beginning at a point on the east
line of the tract hereby conveyed, twenty-five (25) feet
North of the southeast.corner of said tract; thence South to
the Southeast corner; thence West twenty-five (25) feet along
the South line of said tract; thence Northeasterly on a
straight line to the point of beginning.
• and
WHEREAS, the Permittees are desirous of utilizing a part of the
unimproved portion of Washburn Avenue for wall and-landscaping
purposes, and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to permit such use based upon the
conditions hereinafter contained,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is stipulated and agreed by and between the
parties as follows:
1. City hereby grants permission to Permittees the right to
use for wall, landscaping, and related purposes the
following portion of Washburn Avenue South (hereinafter
referred to as the "subject area"):
The east five feet of the right-of-way of Washburn
Avenue included in the foregoing legal description.
-2-
2. In the event that the City shall need to use the
subject area for roadway or other public purposes at
any time, the permission granted in paragraph one (1)
above, shall terminate upon 30 days written notice by
the City to the Permittees.
3. The Permittees shall not erect or permit the erection
or construction of any improvements on the subject area,
except a three foot brick-faced retaining wall and land-
scaping materials which is hereby permitted, without the
prior written approval of the City.
4. All improvements constructed or placed in the subject area
by the Permittees shall be removed upon the termination
of this permission. The Permittees shall make no claim
against the City for the value of any improvement which
is affected by the termination of the permission herein •
granted.
5. Permittees agree to indemnify the City and save it harm-
less against any claims, actions, causes of action, or
costs or expenses of defending the same, arising out of
or by reason of the granting of this permit or by reason
of the use or occupancy of the City's right-of-way pursuant
to the permission herein granted.
6. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the
benefit of the parties and their heirs, successors and
assigns.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands
the day and year first above written.
0
-3-
i
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
By
Loren L. Law
Its Mayor
By
Karl Nollenberger
Its City Manager
SUPER AMERICA
By_
Its
By_
Its
0
T
CJ
,&-,, 7,F,,4 TTE M
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 294
Agenda September 24,1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Fire
Protection Code
At the August 27, 1979 city council meeting, the city council
gave first reading consideration to an ordinance amendment which
would amend Richfield's existing fire prevention code to bring it
into conformance with the Minnesota Uniform Fire Prevention Code.
During the last session of the Minnesota Legislature, a statute
was passed making the provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code
the minimal standard to be utilized by all governmental jurisdictions
• throughout the state. Since the state has now established a uniform
standard, it is the recommendation of the Public Safety Director,
in which I concur, that the city council amend Richfield's existing
fire prevention code to bring it into conformance with the Minnesota
Uniform Fire Prevention Code. The city attorney has prepared the
necessary ordinance amendment to accomplish this change.
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached for
second reading consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
C "Lin
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
cc: Public Safety Director
City Clerk
LEGAL NOTICE
Bill 1979-17
• AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III,
PART I, SECTION 3.09-OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter III, Part I, Section 3.09, Subdivision 1 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, relating
to the adoption of certain fire prevention codes is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"3.09 FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
Subdivision 1. Adoption of Fire Prevention Code.
The following is hereby adopted by reference as
an ordinance of the city: [The Fire Prevention
Code published by the American Insurance Association,
1965 Edition, as amended] The Minnesota Uniform Fire
Code including the 1973 edition of the Uniform Fire
Code and amendments to it and including the 10 volume
national codes of the National Fire Protection Assoc-
iation (1973-74).
The provisions of such code are hereby adopted and
• incorporated into this code as if fully set forth
herein and shall be in full force and effect in this
city, except as hereinafter specified.
0
t
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
• Council Letter No. 293
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Tabulation of Bids and Recommendation
to Reject Bids, L/H/N Project Fence
At the regular council meeting of August 13, 1979, the city
council authorized advertisement for bids for fence installation
along the north end of the new aligned 65th Street from one-half
block east of Blaisdell Avenue to mid-block between Wentworth and
Pillsbury Avenue. This fence is to be installed as part of the
L/H/N public improvement project.
The city manager opened bids for this work on September 20,
• 1979. The acting public works director, environmental health
director, engineering technician II and acting city clerk were
also present at this bid opening.. The bid minutes and tabulations
are attached for city council review.
Two bids were received, one from Odland Construction, Inc.
in the amount of $20,460, and the second from Viking Fence Co.,
in the amount of $23,998.65.
a
Quotations for this work which were received earlier this
year indicated an anticipated cost to install the fence of less
than $10,000. Since the bids received so greatly exceed the
estimated project cost, it is the recommendation of the acting
public works director, which I concur, that the city council reject
both bids and authorize the city staff to purchase materials to
construct this fence during the winter months with existing city
personnel for site placement next spring.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
so KN/eja
cc: Acting Public Works
Acting City Clerk
Planning & Redevelopment Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Bid Opening
September 20, 1979
is
Wood Fence
City Project No. 705
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative
staff was called by Karl Nollenberger, City Manager, who announced that the
purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for a
Wood Fence, as advertised in the official newspaper on September 12, 1979.
Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager
M. Raaen, Acting Public Works Director
I. Roesler, Enviornmental Health Director
A. Bailey, Engineering Technician II
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
The following bids were received and read aloud:
BIDDER AND
BID SECURITY
TOTAL BID
Odland Construction, Inc.
B.B. 5% $20,460.00
Viking Fence & Construction Co.
B.B. 5% $23,998.65
The City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered
at the September 24, 1979, city council meeting.
Sylvia K. Bergh Ac°ing City Clerk
00
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
0
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfeld
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 292
Agenda September 24, 1979
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to City
Organization. First Reading
There is an item on the September 24, 1979 city council agenda
which relates to the adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter II,
Part II, and Section 2.29, Part III of the ordinance code of the
City of Richfield. This ordinance code is the enabling legislation
for the structure of the administrative branch of the city govern-
ment. It establishes the role of the city manager expanded from
the duties assigned by city charter and establishes the various
departments of the city organization.
The ordinance enclosed with the council packet establishes the
six departments of the city as we have been discussing in the 1980
proposed budget. The organizational format has been the subject of
many hours of discussion since July 1 by the city council and the city
staff. The major four program areas of community services, administra-
tive services, public safety and community development are established
by the ordinance with the functional activities assigned to them. In
addition, the legal department and liquor stores department are main-
tained as separate departments as has been discussed with the city
council.
The new ordinance does not specifically establish the divisions
within the program areas, but allows them to be established by
resolution of the city council. This provides a means by which the
city council can annually, when they are adopting the subsequent
year's budget, authorize organization for activities within the de-
partments. Due to the fact that the city council has had so much
discussion concerning this organizational effort, I will not go into
the details of the activity allocation unless the council has questions
at the city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
YS,.; .ti
Karl Nollenberge?
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Personnel Director
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER II,
PART II, AND SECTION 2.29,
PART III, OF THE ORDINANCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD.
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter II, Part II of the ordinance code of the City of
Richfield providing for the structure of the administrative branch
of the city government is hereby amended to provide as follows:
"2.13. CITY MANAGER.
Subdivision 1. General. The manager is the chief administrative
officer of the city. He is responsible to the council for the super-
vision of all departments and divisions of city administration except
where otherwise provided by law. He shall prepare and distribute
to department and division heads such rules and regulations as he
deems necessary for the orderly and efficient conduct of city
administrative affairs. The manager shall periodically review the
administrative structure of the city and may recommend to the council
changes in the administrative organization of the city.
Subd. 2. Specific Duties. The manager nt
r
the get.] shall have those resoonsibilit_es assigned to him
by th e city charter. He may employ an administrative assistant and
such other employees including an administrative intern as are neces-
sary for the execution of his duties. The manager's personal office
staff is a separate department of the city administrative service[.]
to be known as the Executive Department.
'2.24 [ EPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION. The administrative servi? of the
city is di.'ded into the following additional departments a divisions
and h eads th eof:
Finance Depa tment - Director of Finance
Division Clerk-Treasurer - Clerk-Trea rer
Division of ssessor - City Assessor
Division of A ounting - City Accou ant
Public Works Departme t - Director of P lic Works
Division of Engine ing - City gineer
Division of Streets a d Sewers - Superintendent of Streets
and Sewers
Division of Inspection - of Inspector
Division of Water - Wate Su rintendent
Municipal Liquor Store - Li or Sto Manager
Public Safety Department Director of blic Safety
Police Division - olice Captain
Fire Division - ire Chief
Civil Defense ivision - Civil Defense Dire or
Administrat' e Services Division - Director o ublic Safety
Legal Departme - City Attorney
Health Depart ent - Health Officer and Sanitarian
Planning D artment - Planning Director
-2-
P a
nt - Parks anti t
rinten ent of P
eation Director
s] 49
DEPART14ENTAL AND-DIVISIONAL ORGANIZATION.
Subdivision 1. The administrative branch of the city is divided.
into the following additional departments and heads thereof:
Administrative Services Department.- Director of Administrative
Services
Public Safety Department - Director of Public Safety
Community Services Department - Director of Community Services
Community Development Department - Director of Community
Development
Legal Department - City Attorney
Liquor Department - Liquor Store Manager
Subd. 2.", The divisions within the foregoing departments shall be
such as are from time to time established by resolution of
council based upon the recommendation of the city manager.
"2.15. GENERAL DUTIES OF DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION HEADS.
Subdivision 1. Administration. Department and division heads are
the administrative officers of the city. They are responsible for
the efficient administration of their respective departments or
divisions and shall inaugurate, with the approval of the manager,
whatever practices, programs and procedures are necessary to ful-
fill that responsibility.
Subd. 2. Assignment of Duties. The manager may assign the same
individual to head two or more departments or to head [a] one or
more divisions within a department. The manager may be a depart-
ment head. Such department head shall perform such additional
duties as may be assigned him by the manager.
"2.16. FINANCE DEPARTMENT.
Subdivisio 1. Duties of Director. The director of fin ce is
responsible t the manager for the organization, plnng, adminis-
tration and coo*dination of the financial affairs a the city.
Subd. 2. Division of the Department of Fin ce.
(1) Division o Clerk-Treasurer. T division of clerk-
treasurer is supervise by the clerk-t asurer, whose duties include,
in addition to those im_ sed by law on city clerks and treasurers,
acting as secretary to th counci and filing and maintaining all
city records. He is respo ibl for the safekeeping of all city funds
and shall maintain
as may be required
(2) Division
by the city assess,
for the maintenanc
the systematic
taxation purp es.
such reco s
by the re t
of A essor.
er. He is res
of whatever
expeditious a
of the financial affairs of the city
or of finance.
The assessor's division is supervised
p si.ble to the director of finance
sys m of records is necessary for
ssess nt of property for general
(3) vision of Accounting. The di
the cit
sion of accounting is
supervis by the city accountant. He is r on%ble to the director
of f' nce for the maintenance of general acco is of the city and
the accounts of the various departments and divi '.ons.J
-3-
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
Duties of Director. The director of administrative services is
responsible to the manager for the organization, planning,
administration and coordination of the administrative services of
the city including those duties imposed by law upon city clerks
and treasurers, acting as secretary to the council, maintaining
all city records, safekeeping and managing of city funds, maintaining
the financial records of the city, performirig the functions of city
assessor, providing central personnel services relating to city
personnel, providing central data processing, printing and supply
services for the city, handling the business affairs of the water
and sewer utilities of the city and such other matters as the city
manager or the city council may specify.
"2.17. [PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
S bdivision 1. Duties of Director. The director
re onsible to the manager for all activities rel
construction, maintenance and operation of public
waste disposal facilities, city buildings, parks,
rolling tock. He is.-further responsible for the
city public works inspection program.
of public works is
ating to the planni
ways, garbage and
real property
supervision o the
Subd. 2. Di 'sion of Public Works Department.
(1) Divi 'on of Engineering. The engineering div' ion is
supervised by th engineer who is responsible to the rector of
public works. His uties include the supervision o the preparation
of all plans, speci cations and other engineerin documents incident
to city construction p ojects, the supervision d inspection of
city construction and m ntenance projects an such other duties of
an engineering nature as y be imposed by e director of public
works.
(2) Division of Streets nd Sewe The streets and sewers
division is supervised by the s eri endent of streets and sewers
who is responsible to the directo of public works for the maintenance
of all city streets, street-lig in systems, traffic control signs
and devices, alleys, public w s, sew s and sewer systems.
(3) Division of Inspe ion. The spection division is super-
vised by the chief inspec or who is respo ible to the director of
public works for the i ementation of the 'ty public works
inspection program. e chief inspector shal supervise the
inspection of all rk performed by the buildin plumbing,
electrical, gas ' stallation and heating and vents ating inspectors
to insure com lance with city construction regulat ns and state
law.
(4) ivision of Water. The water division is supe ised by
the su rintendent of water who shall be responsible to th director
of p lic works for the operation and maintenance of the city ater
s em, including the water plants and meter system.)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
Duties of Director. The director of community services is
responsible to the manager for the organization, planning, adminis-
tration and coordination of community services of the city including
the ice arena, swimming pool, community centar, recreation activities,
Wood Lake Nature Center, forestry activities, maintenance of amenity
areas, maintenance of government buildings, operation of the central
-4-
garage, operation and maintenance of the parks, streets and
sewer and water utilities of the city and such other matters
as the city manager and the city council may specify.
"2.1$. [MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE.] LIQUOR DEPARTYENT...-.The liquor
store-manager-is . responsible:-to:.the manager.-for the operation- of
the.city liquor stores.
11
"2.19. PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT.
.] Duties of Director. The director of public
safety is responsible to the manager for all activities relating
to public safety including enforcement of state laws and city
ordinances and the preservation of law and order in the city,
the direction of fire fighting, fire protection and fire prevention
activities of the city, the direction of emergency (^-dPfense)
activities within the city, the assignment of personnel within the
public safety department subject to applicable civil service laws,
[?'1 the establishment of public safety training programs[.],
the conduct.of all health and safety inspection programs, the
providing of all support services for the foregoing functions and
such other matters as the city manager or the city council may
specify. The fire division is supervised by the director of
public safety who is the chief of the division. There shall be
one or more assistant chiefs in the division.
[ ubd. 2. Police Division. The police division is supervised by
th director of public safety.]
[Subd. Fire Division. The fire division i upervised by the
director. public safety who is the chief the division. There
shall be on ore more assistant chiefs i he division.]
[Subd. 4. Civil efense Division. he civil defense division is
supervised by a civ' defense di ctor who is responsible to the
director of public sa .]
[Subd. 5. Administrativ S vices Division. The Administrative
Services Division is s ervise by the director of public safety.
Employees within suc division s 11 provide all support services
not constituting 're-fighting or c 'minal law enforcement, to the
other three div' ions of the public sa ty department. Such
support may i lude secretarial services, adio dispatching,
community s vice officer activities, and tr nees who are not in
classifie civil service positions. Employees oviding such
support ervices within the public safety departure at the time
of th adoption of this subdivision shall be assigned o the
adm' istrative services division. Any employee of the p ice or
fi e division who are so assigned shall retain their civil rvice
atus if their appointment was made pursuant to civil servic .]
"2.20. LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
The city attorney is the legal advisor to the council and the manage-.
He is responsible to the manager for administrative matters affectif
the legal department. The city attorney shall represent the city in
legal proceedings to which the city is a party and perform such other
functions of a legal nature as the council may direct.
-5-
I
0
0
"2.21. HEALTH DEPARTMENT. '
Subdivisio 1.* Sanitarian. The sanitarian is responsible to th
manager for t e enforcement of the provisions of this code an fate
laws affecting ublic health. He is responsible for the de lopment
and execution of inspection program covering establis ents
preparing, manufact ing, storing and handling commodi es intended
for human consumption.
Subd. 2. Health Officer. he health office- s the medical advisor
to the council and the manag in matters fecting public health.
He shall advise the sanitarian n the eparation of inspection
programs, recommend to the manage ?propriate action for infractions
of city health ordinances or st e alth laws, rules or regulations,
and recommend the abatement nuisanc affecting the public health.
The health officer shall e a doctor of icine licensed to practice
in Minnesota.
Subd. 3. Board f Health. Whenever the council solves itself to
sit as the b rd of health, the health officer and sanitarian
shall be -officio members of such board and shall ad e the board
on mat rs relating. to health and shall recommend to the and such
meas es for adoption as they may deem essential.]
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
Duties of Director. The director of community development is res-
ponsible to the manager for the organization, planning, administration
and coordination of the community development functions of the city
including the administration of planning and zoning matters, the
engineering activities of the city and the performance of administra-
tive and technical services on a contractual basis for the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority and such other matters as the city
manager or the city council may specify.
[2.22. PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
ec or is resp ning
a ]
of S.111
[2 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTME
The parks an r n or is responsible to the manager for
the parks and rec on pro d rograms of the city. He is
responsib r supervision of the activitie u erintendent
-6-
9
•
Chapter II, Part III, Section 2.29, Subdivision 1, is hereby
amended to provide as follows:
"2.29. DEFINITIONS.-
Subdivision 1. Administrative Personnel. For the purposes of this
chapter the following named positions shall constitute the department
heads[,
[ Department Heads: Finance director; liquor s manager,
public wor director; park and recreation direc public safety
director; envir ntal health director a anning director.)
[(2) Assistant Depa e eads: Assistant liquor store managers,
and assistant park and create director.]
[(3) Sion Heads: City assessor; f inspector; street
super' endent; parks superintendent; accountant;eering
tendent.?
a ociate; fire chief, civil defense director and water
Director of Administrative Services
Director of Public Safety
Director of Community Services
Director of Community Development
City Attorney
Liquor Store Manager"
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this
day of
1979.
ren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST:
•
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 291
Agenda September 24,197`
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Special Use Permit and Off-Street Parking
Contract Request for a Physical Education
Facility Addition at the Academy of Holy
Angels
ft
The Academy of Holy Angels is requesting a special use permit,
and off-street parking contract to allow them to construct a physi-
cal education facility addition adjacent to their existing facility
at 6600 Nicollet Avenue.
Holy Angels is proposing to build a 14,970 square foot addition
to house a gymnasium and locker rooms. The additional will be loca-
ted 20 feet west of the existing Holy Angels building and will be
connected to the north wing by a connecting hallway. Exterior build-
ing materials will be alternating brick panels and pre-cast concrete
panels in a beige or sand color. Thy brick will match the existing
brick romanesque building to the east. Earth berms and landscaping
will be completed in the front of the building.- A 10-foot wide as-
phalt fire vehicle access drive/pedestrian walk will be constructed
from the existing parking lot south of the proposed addition to 66th
Street. This access drive will have a drive-over curb at 66th Street
to prevent use by general automobile traffic. The applicant will
also provide additional freestanding fire hydrants within an adequate
distance from all sides of the building.
The existing access drive to the site from Nicollet on the south
edge of the property will be widened to 30 feet. A bus loading and
unloading area will be provided around the border area. The applicant
has also agreed to provide the city with an easement for pedestrian
and bikeway system along the western edge of the property.
Zoning Ordinance Requirements
Section 3.30, subdivision 2 requires
use permits before locating in residence
tion 3.41, subdivision 5 requires that it
addition would not be detrimental to the
that schools obtain special
(R) zoning district. Sec-
be found that the proposed
public welfare.
Council Letter No. 291 -2- September 24, 1979
0 Other Zoning Requirements
Section 4.05 sets standards for off-street parking areas.
Staff Findings
1. The proposal would be in compliance with the city's
comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed addition should not generate a significant
increase in traffic. The facility is intended to better
serve the existing population of over 800 students. The
improved facilities will allow more events to be held,
but these events will generally be held in the evening
and late afternoon when Holy Angels or St. Peter's do
not have school classes in session. The improvements
being constructed on Nicollet Avenue and 66th Street as
part of the L/H/N project will insure that the streets
will be able to handle any increase of traffic due to
this proposal.
3. According to city parking guidelines, 280 off-street
parking spaces should be provided for use on the site.
Approximately 70 spaces currently exist on the site.
An additional 400 spaces are available on the adjacent
Church of St. Peter's parking lot.
Holy Angels has entered into a limited agreement with
the Church of St. Peter to allow Holy Angels to use the
Church of St. Peter's parking lot on weekends and after
3:00 p.m. on weekdays. With this additional parking,
sufficient off-street parking is available. However,
the agreement expires on September 1, 1980 or upon 180
day written notice. If the agreement is ever terminated
or if the Church of St. Peter ever expands its building
which eliminates parking and/or requires additional parking,
sufficient parking may not be available in the future.
Either a permanent agreement should be worked out between
Holy Angels and the Church of St. Peter for use of the
parking lot, or Holy Angels has agreed to enter into an
agreement with the city to provide 205 additional park-
ing spaces to city standards if this existing agreement
with St. Peter's is ever terminated.
4. The existing parking areas do not meet city parking lot
standards. The Holy Angels parking areas do not meet
city standards for surface material, perimeter curbing,
striping, and site lighting. The Church of St. Peter's
parking lot does not meet city standards for perimeter
curbing, and site lighting. Holy Angels has agreed to
repair all existing parking areas on their property and
10 to properly light them with a simple security light. The
single gravel parking lot which has been in existence
for 10 years will remain gravel.
Council Letter No. 291 -3-
September 24, 1979
5. There are existing access problems on the site. The
existing access from Nicollet is narrow and can become
. blocked during a fire emergency by cars leaving the
site. Holy Angels proposes to widen this access and
provide a secondary fire vehicle access from 66th Street
to help alleviate this problem. The fire vehicle access
will be designed to appear as a pedestrian way with a curb
at 66th Street to prevent general automobile use. The
access should be designed to protect the public improve-
ments along 66th Street. Its alignment should protect
existing trees while providing proper fire vehicle
access. The Church of St. Peter's parking lot would
be connected to the existing Holy Angels access drive to
provide additional access to the site. This connection
will be chained off prior to 3:00 p.m. on weekdays to
protect children who use the Church of St. Peter's parking
lot as a playground.
6. School buses currently load and unload on 66th Street
or Nicollet Avenue which poses safety and traffic flow
problems on those streets. A bus turnout area will be
provided for loading and unloading to eliminate the safety
and traffic flow problems mentioned above.
7. The Academy of Holy Angels is one of the older, more
impressive buildings within the city. Holy Angels wants
to protect the quality and character of the structure and
the open space on the site. The propsoed new structure
will match or complement the color of the existing build-
ing. The school will use a design which uses smooth
concrete panels and brick panels to match the character
of the existing buildings.. The existing character of
the site will also be affected because a number of mature
trees will have to be removed to allow construction of
the proposed addition.
A portion of the site along 66th Street is currently
zoned general commercial C-2. This should be rezoned
to residence R to protect the character of the site and
also to protect the public investment in the L/1-1/N
project. Holy Angels sees no need to do this because
they do not intend to ever develop that portion of the
site for commercial use.
8. Serious fire safety problems exist at the existing Holy
Angels facility. Holy Angels and the public safety
department have reached an agreement to resolve these
fire safety problems.
Planninq Commission Recommendation
The planning commission recommends that the special use permit
be issued with the following stipulations:
1. That the Academy of Holy Angels enter into either a
permanent agreement with the Church of St. Peter for
use of their parking facilities, or an agreement with
0
Council Letter No. 291 -4- September 24, 1979
city guaranteeing that an additional 205 spaces
will be provided to city standards if the existing
agreement with the Church of St. Peter is terminated.
2. That all new parking areas be upgraded to city stand-
ards and all old areas be paved or blacktopped.
3. That the fire vehicle access drive from 66th Street
be constructed with mountable curbs at both ends.
Final alignment and the design of its interface with
the public improvements along 66th Street should be
approved by the city staff.
4. A connection to the Church of St. Peter's parking lot
should be provided from the Holy Angels access drive.
This connection should be chained off prior to 3:00
p.m. on weekdays.
5. A bus turnout lane should be constructed on the access
drive to Nicollet Avenue to an alternative acceptable
to city staff.
6. Brick which matches the existing structure should be
used on the north and west exterior portions of the
proposed addition.
0
7. The Holy Angels Academy and the public safety depart-
ment arrive at a workable program to correct existing
fire safety problems.
8. That fire hydrant design and location be approved by
the public safety and public works department.
Staff Recommendation
In agreement with Holy Angels the staff would recommend that
the special use permit be issued with the following stipulations
to insure that the proposal would not be detrimental to the public
welfare:
1. That the Academy of Holy Angels enter into either a
permanent agreement with the Church of St. Peter for
use of their parking facilities or an agreement with
the cicy guaranteeing that an additional 205 parking
spaces will be provided to city standards if the ex-
isting agreement with the Church of St. Peter is term-
inated.
2. That Holy Angels Academy and the public safety department
implement a program to correct existing fire safety
problems.
is 3. That fire hydrant design and location be approved by
the public safety and public works departments.
Council Letter No. 291 -5- September 24, 1979
Off-Street Parking Contract
. The staff recommends that the off-street parking contract be
approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ e j a
cc: Acting Public Works Director
Public Safety Director
Planning & Redevelopment Director
0
i
1
PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT -TO BE DEDICATED ALONG RAILROAD TRACKS
--------- -- ''
Ys,
x
f>Ni
2
fl
V38
I
i
i
0
N
'
O
c
I .
m
x
N
r
fl
m e f .
z
I
I
%i
z<l
"-""---
'
f
,
J -.--
O ,
C I ?
r -r T' i Z
fl I
rI '
f
i11
m
m
? v
m
1
CU D
m o
r-
0 -?
n 0
m
rn
?l m
o
c =
?
Z o
o ?
z Az
m
*
? II
im a ;r
o ry o Z ill
1 N O ? ? i? ?j)
r
` II
1
' i
i
I
I
I
SPECIAL PL--P N,IT PLAN NCOLLET AYE `
HOLY ANC-ELS AT(,LET" FACILITY. o o
IE KLr?=fl
D-SIGN: RS - BUILDERS - DEVELOPERS
L D, F. -
.... cl, OiA
??- 'S`am-i?d0i3/??O • S?a?011i 13 SF_'?^:?',S=?
ox?i-E- n
t
f
r
4
I_
O
J_
m
z
F--
N
X
W
l?_?_f1.7CJ 0l1? i, ;1C 51Z;DNV 110H
?fvCld -LIJQU3d 1CI03dS
r
a0 - -
o?
as ze 24
65 W -----
\I 8 2 _ J - 1
THE HUES
SHOPPING CENTER N
12, 7 B'-"_r 9
- - -
ST
II ?
_ z
:D
--Li U
R'ALRI h1 L'?B S
Lli
DIRO 'IA A9
Ali, -Atf,<
l_?? w G l- -' 4 3i -' v Q 3 Ji
qT
CT
SIGNATURES ON PETITION
6 3
P .r 5
r
a
I
LICENSE AGREEMENT
The parties hereto are as follows: •nb, '- `t.e ,-g,^=y
Corroratior.. , (hereinafter "Holy Angels") and
,(hereinafter "St. Peters").
WHEREAS, Holy Angels is the owner of several buildings
located at
WHEREAS, Holy Angels property is immediately adjacent
to property owned by St. Peters;
• WHEREAS,'a portion of the property owned by St_ Peters
is used as a parking lot, which property is more particularly
ri.-
he ._o,_
described as follows: The -.,rest of the ,?,h z of the ? south 1: of the ?, a no_
s of the southwest ?z except roads are, e= -e-pt ,:est 25 feet the_eof. Saction
27, to,•mship 28, range 24. Plat LU27, pa_'•c;el 3512, district 1.2.
WHEREAS, Holy Angels does not have sufficient parking
facilities for the parking of cars for various events held at
Holy Angels;
WHEREAS, in connection with the construction of a new
gymnasium, the City of __ icnf:el? --is requiring that Holy
Angels acquire additional parking facilities.
C WHEREAS, because of mutual considerations, St. Peters
is willing to allow its parking lot area to be used by patrons
of various Holy Angels events, provided that St. Peters is held
? i
J .
harmless from any claims for damage to property or injuries
sustained on the parking lot property by patrons of Holy Angels'
events.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOtr'S :
1. St. Peters hereby grants Holy Angels and the
patrons of Holy Engels a license to use that certain parking
6720 P;icoilet pie.
lot located at itheabove ^e'^1=or the purposes of parking only
lot
for events sponsored by or under the control of Holy Angels.
2. In consideration of the license granted at para-
graph 1 above, Holy Angels agreed to indemnify and hold St.
Peters harmless from any and all causes of action or claims
for damages or personal injuries that arise on account of or
in connection with the use of the parking lot property by patrons
of Holy Angels' events unless such damage or personal injury was
caused solely by the negligence of St. Peters and Holy Angels
further agrees to maintain public liability insurance in the
amount of $ 250,000 .for property damage and in the amount
of $ 1,000,OCO for injuries suffered by one person or
$x,000,000 for injuries suffered in one incident. Such
insurance shall provide that St. Peters will receive written
notice, at least 10 days prior to the cancellation of the insur-
ance policy in question.
3. This agreement shall continue until terminated in
writing by either party giving 180 days written notice to the
f ?
?i
other party.
'. STATE OF MINNESOTA),,
4. All notices required to be given under the terms
of this agreement should be given at the follcwi'ng addresses:
Holy Angels St. Peters
6600 Nicollet Ave. 6720 Nicollet Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55423 Minneapolis, :SIN 55423
HOLY ANGELS
e-??2 Imo)
By
Its
ST. PETERS
- 1
Its
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was ackno,,., e ?ed before me this
day of 19 7 8, by 7 2u.L?ti_,1 ti4 m-?--- _ t h e
of Holy Angels.
NO
h` ?.i ?r? nnnnnnnnn ¦
L'ARLYi SOLI
e 40TARY PU9LIC - miNsES01A
HF'NN=Pfr4 CCi TY
hiycornmi"W;1expires lur?Z1, 1980
xVW`/V'/W?yVyyV?n'VWWWV.VVYVVVW? K
STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was c}nowledge be ore me this
d 0f01 197 8 , by ..? -;;the
r- of St. Iet s. --I
1 - .
TN 3
Notary Pu ?l c
x hM?1v?^M/ r
MAAIS SOLT
W:TARY P''6L1C - MINNESOTA
r1 r1;f1!,Er,:: rC C:TY
hlrcorn'n?s;u:,Expnkslar.btl, 1'??0
x vwv`vw?v,?v?wv,iw?vwwtiw,iv,Nw r
a.
C? .I"/THE CHURCH OF SAINT PETER 67,30 NICOLLET AVENUE, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 83423
July 31, 1978
The Church of St. Peter hereby grants permission to The Academy
.of the Holy Angels to use the parking facility owned by The Church
of St. Peter. Both institutions have been identified by their
legal corporate title.
The r3c conditions under which this permission is being granted
are as follows t
r 1) The term of this agreement shall be from September 1, 1978
to September 1, 1980. This agreement shall be reviewed
during the month of May, 1980 to determine whether renewing
• this agreement is necessary or advisable,
2) This agreement encompasses only those activities sponsored
by the Academy of the Holy Angels which take place after
3:00 in the afternoon on school days. Weekend activities
are included in this agreement with no restrictions on
time.
3) The insurance carrier for The Academy of the Holy Angels
shall submit to The Church of St. Peter a certificate of
liability coverage that includes The Church of St. Peter
as an additional insured with respect to the use of the
parking facility. This is to be or. file before Sept. 1, 1978.
(Rev.Joseph G. Kivel (Sr) Susan 0eff3ingg
Pastor Co-principal
?i
Michael Donlin
Co-principal
?3 i 1
5 4 ' Q
Z
64 ST. <
l09 I lO,
• j ' 2 II
4CC
65 th
66 th
7`2 °
F? F1
9 :2
7 -, Q Q
6'?t h
2? 'I F- 1
ir(I 2
1 ?e
? 16I 19
- „?
JEEIJ
LLi
o Q
`? ? A
Q jt
Q.
2
IV16'?'
bL[ FT9 Z U
oj? 9!Z C7-
9
,^
B 3 _}. CL _ 8 13 .. I? _
I4 -r U) -
- ;4 1 I
2nd 1 f-
z
4 JI ?o
?\
Q ' ? -'
' \X, w
9.??5 ?? Q 6 15 -„
5 5 ?
Land Use Mao
ST
(RALiiW n
r N?ll L <BAC,
-
L-J 11 -- IT -
X11 0 = ?_ 1,TJI
6'8 th
S T.
44/
F, 77-
SINGLE FAMILY
\1 ee 1
?yy CONWERCIAL/
MULTIPLE FAMILY INDUSTRIAL
VACANT
-J J ? z- PUBLIC; INSTITUTIONAL
I
14-L i
?? X- ? I S J I W
? f
RLIS ,
J ?L
1 [Ij'i
?13•.t s
54
.6 1
-I} 1?
-+
4 1!
I`1 p?2o-J, _Jf^iS4CVT=?r w _ I2i?
X_ I QI __.. VT 11It•? Gam' rYCa 7wr _: .. ST..
III li?,l7 ?/ •, j
• <? f "-:?f Z ---fT7 ir? k J I _ I. I --?y-?,,??±'--R'_?!T+? -l ??'?`? ••'_?- r
71
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1 - ~ L Z, I r": I : ?2
i p
LIMITED BUSINESS
Go
GENERAL COMMERCIAL
.l W1-._?.' '/2-- STREET .p.1`1' -
a I' -
,x, I
j
65 th- - -
-GQUidTY-:
F' •
J
Q +
K`^ c{
z;
1. e ROA D??'- , -. -
em;.
Site
t7t
cn
o,
z
r
ST. 1 f. x
Z? -- _J 6 w p 1 J
24 1 7r:
is
23; l o O u n
(412 5 _' "
t4- 14
4• 1 371 ,'a 4'? I i •a ok?yAV?6J
Il i m I LPH OLLENbACK'Ss i?j mac' r rSS^p! JcS. Li
„ s. ` Z e ww ?' t t ?r+? Z ?S' lit!
5 ?s s,z'a W s 3? ?s 3 b? :.Ix
`'4 1 i sS l `I°i nsADDITION s i6"5AK!4:'A O
4 `= r -' 4...<? j .I .i! i'_tir 3 y ..? ?. ?{.'?`?4
'1?' 3 rI c? ??? ?a IK°•° 14 f. {y :.llv 1.{5 ?1 ?111YY??Y???...... {• ,:!
1'tt.ll.I_? Se
ST. '.-: 1""?_r. fxT-•?i? ?1{?•<2.
1- b+i •Y? J L. y 1? T fk` j) 1p u ti +] t ?_? fT ( =t?
ri d??s ,,z` I u '? ?3'S0.' J?ti?51 y..t. ,y. ? h''?: Yi2rtr 1 ?y t1 ti il?yt. ?.p SLYSIp?
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
ST. -
w
0
•
0
3
- ? J L \ .......
a ? ? - p
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
f
Council Letter No. 290
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000, Sign Relocation
Lyndale Avenue Easement Area
The city council on September 10, 1979 approved a contract
to provide for moving a fence and light post off the easement
strip being acquired next to the Lyndale Garden Center to complete
the Lyndale Avenue improvement project.. In addition to moving of
the fence and light posts, it is also necessary to move the two
free-standing advertising signs in front of the building. Each
sign has electrical lighting from the Lyndale Garden Center. Be-
cause the city is acquiring an easement from the Lyndale Garden
Center for improvements to Lyndale Avenue, the city is required
. to pay for the relocation of this property from the easement area.
The following estimates to move these signs have been
received:
1. Signcrafters, Inc. (including
2. Nordquist Company
Electrical work estimated at
3. Attracta Sign, Inc.
Electrical work
It is recommended that the city council
Signcrafters, Inc. in the amount of $2,
relocation.
electrical) $2,184
$1,575
750 $2,325
$1,945
787 $2,732
accept the quotation of
184 to undertake the sign
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ ej a
cc: Acting Public Works Director
City Clerk
Planning & Redevelopment Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 289
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Request for Zoning Ordinance Amendment to
Allow Punch Presses with Rated Capacities Over
20 Tons in Industrial (I) Zoning Districts
Mr. Mike Scherling, of Cedar Industries, 6311 Cedar Avenue,
has requested that Section 3.34, subdivision 1, paragraph 12 of
the zoning ordinance be amended to allow punch presses up to 150
tons rated capacity. The zoning ordinance currently limits presses
in an industrial district to 20 ton capacity.
The staff has recently learned that Mr. Scherling has been
• operating presses up to 150 tons for a considerable length of
time, and has advised him that it is necessary for him to request
a change in the ordinance if his operation is to be permitted to
continue. The staff and council members have received numerous
complaints from the adjacent airport pet hospital concerning noise
and vibrations resulting from the press operation.. The following
items are attached to this council letter:
1. Letters from Cedar Industries
2. Petition from Airport Pet Hospital
3. Existing Ordinance
Staff Recommendation
Because Mr. Scherling's request is a land use matter, it is
the opinion of the staff that this matter should be referred to
the planning commission for study and a recommendation to the
city council. It is, therefore, recommended that the city council
accept Mr. Svherling's request, and refer the request to the plann-
ing commission.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Planning & Redevelopment Director
` ' 0 CSI I I NC.
10 6311 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423
WELDING
METAL STAMPINGS
TUBE FABRICATION
recz -,);?cc uI y 1•2qut t_1 t tilt City of icic f ld
c'1a_)t?r 3 .Dart IV. ect'c:-l .`4, =7t:hdivis_o'
City o!_ L _chf ie?d
Rick Jookc?
and
`700 ?otLand :`v }o.
?iiCl1
tir. Jo;D;,e:
`le
Ordina_I
is, 7a
capac-'ty.
Cedar InduQ t? eS
612 - 86 9-24 92
612 - 869-6009
I_lc . i s I?Ql Int C1:11.
o')2l:at'? 1 ccrl')].latlc' t') t: C_ty
^.t,i.r?L%1? _?it^ -`1 ."S i `_1c ?•7? nEtVP ?1UC?
Your ?dl`ii iLtent]_o']1 '7ouId greatly ' rn ?c L cite .
Cad I .dui ti iec I.lc
e_ I
:? Sch;?rli:? %
0
1 '
D DUSTRI INC.
0
WELDING
METAL STAMPINGS
TUBE FABRICATION
6311 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423
612 - 869-2492
612 - 869.6009
S it. L1 1.)/9
•
C _Cy of i'lC n i old
G,2-1tIemC 7):
T;7- ;ai e fu ru _':z h _r1` -lie fc l lc^7-.71`; 1_17L of Pu1:?c ? P e, s es
icco ted __t I! C-d..I I,! cc", Lot Of
N-2z.= Ford 1 ora,a .
Tc:z
1-7 Tc i
I Toy
l To-i
l-'?7 To
l -? ^ TC-.1
? _^ ^ rrcn
?-5 Tc
1 - TCn
i 07)
I -77 Tca YLc° / ,r?J .?, c:? i t cz l li fS! f
Tc--i A,
rI,c.?
T
-?? To-1
^
- 1.c
0
f
Petition to the Richfield City Council- and Mayor
• A petition to the Richfield City Council is hereby submitted
by the undersigned, in order to request the denial of a Special
Use Permit to Cedar Industries, Inc., 6311 Cedar Ave. S., Rich-
field, Mn. 55423, for the operation of press machines, unless
this industry complies with the Richfield Ordinance pertainig
to noise and vibration.
Cedar Industries, Inc., hash een operating their press machines
during the week from 7:00 AM to 2:00 AM for the last two months,
without a Special Use Permit.
The Special Use Permit is required for the operation of press
machines with capacity of over 20 Tons: Ordinance 3.34, Sub. 1,
Article # 12, page 69 of the Richfield Ordinance Code.
Cedar Industries, Inc., has been operating press machines of
one-hundred Tons, one-hundred-ten Tons, and one-hundred-fifty Tons,
without this Special Use Permit.
The operation of these machines has been causing noise and
vibration in our building which is interfering with some of our
working laboratory tests, resting periods, and general well being,
in violation of Nuisance Ordi-.nance 10.01, Sub.l, Article # 1, and
Sub. 4, Article # 5 of the Richfield Ordinance Code.
• We, the undersigned, who work and rest at 6301 Cedar Ave., S.,
Richfield, Mn. 55423, Airport Pet Hospital, adjacent to Cedar
Industries, Inc., present this petition to the Richfield City
Council asking for denial of the Special Use Permit to Cedar
Industries, Inc., for the operation of the press machines, unless
the presses are shock mounted or otherwise isolated to eliminate
the noise and vibration nuisance.
We, the undersigned, also request the denial of the proposed amendment.
and variance to the Ord.3.34, Sub.l, Art.'12, to Cedar
_Industries,_Inc,,
Very truly yours, Sept. 14, 1979
(_?' it).-) tvcz??
Dr. W. D. Blaine
Dr. L.M. Wendland
47 C.
Dr. R. Brannian A.P. Farmer
4A I
J.E. Bielke P.J. Johnson
• L.C. Blaine R. Von Mosch
I 3.34. USE REGULATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (1)
Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. In the "I" district, unless otherwise provided
in this chapter, no building or land shall be used and no building shall here-
after be erected or structurally altered except for one or more of the following
uses:
(1) Any use permitted in a "C-2" district, subject to any procedural
requirements applicable in the "C-2" district.
(2) Wholesale businesses and warehouses.
(3) Automobile assembly or major repair.
(4) Creamery, bottling plant, ice cream manufacture, ice manufacture, cold
storage or milk distributing station.
(5) The manufacturing, compounding, processing, packaging or treatment of
cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and food products, except fish, meat products,
sauerkraut, vinegar, yeast and the rendering or refining of fats and oils.
(6) The manufacturing, compounding, assembling or treatment of articles
or merchandise from previously prepared materials such as bond, cloth, cork,
fiber, leather, paper, plastics, metals, or stones, tobacco, wax, yarns and
wood.
(7) Manufacture of musical instruments, novelties and mouldec rubber
products.
(8) The manufacture or assembly of electrical applicances, instruments
and devices.
(9) Manufacture of pottery or other similar ceramic products, using only
previously pulverized clay and kilns fired only be electricity or gas.
(10) Laboratories - Experimental, film or testing.
(11) The manufacture and repair of electric signs, advertising structures,
light sheet metal products, including heating and ventilating equipment.
C (12) Blacksmith, welding or other metal shop, excluding punch presses over
20 tons rated capacity, drop hammers and the like.
(13) Laundries, bag, carpet and rug cleaning; provided necessary- equipment
is installed and operated to effectively precipitate or recover dust.
R (14) Building materials sales yard, retail lumber yard, contractors storage
yard, contractors equipment sales and rental, storage and sale of food or
fuel, provided dust is effectively controlled and storage yard for a delivery
or draying service.
(15) Foundry casting light-weight nonferrous metals or electric foundry
not causing noxious fumes or odors.
(16) Inflammable liquids, underground storage only, not to exceed 25,000
gallons, if located not less than 300 feet from any "R" District.
(17) Any necessary uses customarily accessory and incidental to a permitted
use.
•
4/8/68
ORDINANCE CODE 60, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO fA
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 288
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Traffic Control Requests
0
•
traffic control devices.
The Traffic Control Committee met on September 18, 1979 to
review pending traffic control requests. A copy of the meeting
minutes and requests for these traffic control devices is attached
for council review, along with a summary.of the criteria adopted
by the council for the committee to use in reviewina requests fnr
The committee has developed the following recommendations
for city council review:
1. Request for stop sin, 72nd Street and Bloomington Ave.
The committee recommends that this request for a stop
sign be denied, since the criteria warranting install-
ation of a stop sign are not met at this intersection.
2. Request for stop sign at 77th Street and 14th Avenue
The committee recommends that a two-way stop sign be
established at this intersection to stop 14th Avenue
traffic at 77th Street. The committee's recommendation
is based on the severe sight obstruction which exists
on the southwest corner of this intersection, from a
screening wall erected around the parking area estab-
lished on that corner.
3. Request for stop signs at 64th Street and Grand Ave-
nue, and 64th Street and Harriet Avenue
The committee recommends that the request for stop
signs on 64th Street and Grand and Harriet Avenues be
denied, since the criteria warranting installation of
stop signs are not met at either of these intersections.
However, the committee recommends that 64th Street be-
tween Lyndale Avenue and Grand Avenue be posted to
prohibit through traffic over three tons per axle.
This load limit would alleviate part of the commercial
traffic which the petitioners have expressed concern
about.
Council Letter No. 288 -2- September 24, 1979
4. Request for stop signs at the intersection of Xerxes
Avenue and West 70th Street
The committee recommends that the city staff contact
the city of Edina to request their cooperation in in-
stalling stop signs on 70th Street at Xerxes Avenue,
and that the City of Richfield install a stop sign on
West 70th Street at Xerxes Avenue only if the City of
Edina installs a stop sign on their side of the 70th
- Xerxes intersection.
The petitioners who requested these traffic control devices
have been notified of the committee's recommendations and advised
that the city council would be reviewing these recommendations at
the September 24, 1979 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
cc: Acting Public Works Director
Public Safety Director
Planning & Redevelopment Director
6
TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MEETING
September 18, 1979
Present: Capt. Ron Richardson, Joyce Wilde, Marshall Raaen
The traffic control committee met at 3:00 p.m. on September 18, 1979
to review several pending traffic control matters. Committee members
had been provided with copies of petitions and letters requesting the
traffic control items under discussion at this meeting prior to the
meeting. The committee reviewed the following items:
1. Request for stop sign, 72nd Street and Bloomington Avenue:
J. Wilde presented a letter that had been received requesting
that the city consider installing a stop sign at the intersection
of 72nd Street and Bloomington Avenue.. M. Raaen observed that
traffic volumes at this intersection were minimal, although
the proximity of this intersection to that of Diagonal Boulevard
and Bloomington Avenue presented unusual traffic patterns which
might be a factor in reviewing this request. R. Richardson
presented an accident analysis for this intersection which
indicated that only five accidents have occurred at this loca-
tion since 1972.
The committee voted to recommend that this request for a stop
sign be denied, and that the criteria warranting installation
of a stop sign are not met at this intersection.
2. Request for Stop sign at 77th Street and 14th Avenue:
J. Wilde presented a letter requesting that the.committee con-
sider installing a stop sign at 77th Street and 14th Avenue.
She observed that the petitioner is concerned with this inter-
section's visibility blockage which resulted from the large
screening wall on the parking lot on the southwest corner of
the intersection. M. Raaen observed that the wall had been
required as part of the addition of the off-street parking
contract for the adjacent. apartment complex, in an effort to
diminish the aesthetic deterrents which a parking .lot would
present to that neighborhood. R. Richardson presented an
accident summary for the intersection which shows that 13
accidents have occurred at this site since 1972. J. Wilde
observed that the accident history, although not meeting the
exact conditions stipulated in the traffic control warrants,
was consistent, and that during any 24 month period since
1972, the accident record has come close to meeting the five
accidents per 24 month period provided for in the warrants.
The committee voted to recommend that a two-way stop sign
be established at this intersection to stop 14th Avenue
traffic at 77th Street. The committee's recommendation is
based on the conclusion that the site obstruction.on the south-
west corner, and the consistent accident history meets the
intent of the traffic control warrants.
3. Request for stop signs at 64th Street and Grand Avenue and
64th Street and Harriet Avenue:
J. Wilde presented a petition which had been received from
residents in the 64th and Grand, and 64th and Harriet area,
requesting installation of stop signs on 64th Street at both
Grand and Harriet Avenues. She observed that the petitioners
also expressed concern with truck traffic on 64th Street through
that area. M. Raaen that traffic volumes through. this inter-
section were very low, although he had observed a number of
commercial vehicles using this portion of 64th Street. R.
Richardson presented accident summaries which indicated that
only three accidents have occurred on the two intersections
since 1972.
The committee recommended that the request for stop signs at
64th Street and Grand and Harriet Avenues be denied, in that
the criteria warranting installation of a stop sign are not
met at these intersections. M. Raaen suggested that this
ppr-tion of _h Street could be posted to establish a load
limit which would effectively prohibit the commercial traffic
about which the petitioners expressed concern. The committee
voted to recommend that 64th Street between Lyndale and Grand
Avenues be posted to prohibit through traffic of more than 3
tons per axle weight.
4. Request for stop signs at the intersection of Xerxes Avenue
and West 70th Street:
J. Wilde presented a letter requesting the installation of •
additional stop signs at the intersection of Xerxes Avenue
and West 70th Street.. M. Raaen observed that Xerxes Avenue
traffic is presently stopped at West 70th Street and that
the additional signs would provide for stopping of 70th Street
traffic. The committee discussed the necessity to provide
either a two-way or a four-way stop sign control at this inter-
section, and agreed that no stop signs should be installed on
Richfield's side of this intersection on 70th Street unless
the City of Edina installed a stop sign on their side of this
intersection.
The committee directed the
Edina to determine whether
a stop sign on 70th Street
further voted to recommend
stop sign at 70th Street a
Edina installs a stop sign
and Xerxes Avenue.
chairman
they are
and Xerx
that the
nd Xerxes
on their
to contact the City of
interested in installing
as Avenue. The committee
City of Richfield install a
Avenue if the City of
side of West 70th Street
7533 Bloomington Avenue
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
29 August 1979
Municipal Building
(Attentions Director of Public Safety)
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Dear Sirs
I would like to bring to your attention the potential
hazard of two traffic intersections here in Richfield and
recommend the installation of STOP signs at both.
The first hazard is at the intersection of 72nd Street
and Bloominglorn Avenue, In this instance, when moving North
on Bloomington and approaching 72nd Street a driver is blinded
from traffic from either the-East or-West in addition to the
traffic coming from the Best off Diagonal Blvd. I think their
should be stop signs on both sides of Bloomington where 72nd
crosses.
The second hazard is at the intersection of 14th & 77th.
In this instance, when moving East on 77th and approaching
14th there is a wall that blinds you of the traffic from.the
right. In this case a stop sign at either one of the two
streets would remedy the possibility of an accident.
I appreciate your time and hope that you can remedy both
of the above situations, If left unattended, I know it's just
a matter of time before something happens at these two inter-
sections. Thank you.
Sincerely,
John Gullickson
I
------.???. •----=tee- ??.??-?-.y -?-ate ?e,?aea??-?_- ??c?"?o - _ __ ----
000,
I
2 V3
0 Cl,Ei %II/E ZM/0 ZSlGM60 2ESI026AI S OF IPICHFIELD? XCQUC-57" OF T!4,c-e 0 my
1
7NE 1A)s-r4 A:n6Aj OF S7UW SIUi )S iN 0arL AICCGrN/3ay<ttoo?. 746 W&7-k4 -SourN Carwt--W S
OF (1. q T14 "D &Z/Wb s4VC. 6-JO (Oql-7 f}Nl? (?fNut? c7T &-t;:.'$,ze 5tk" sTCo j A5 W(5(t--ASS
fWSI GL. I THE (,JEST Cd&mc?Iz. 4F ( 3 rLD. ??ov 444Z/z,?-F i ez, 6r24Au D . I.JC' AC.SO
2EQuC`-Sr P1Z0ll l&)C-ti1T DISF1J17 OF LOAD LIMIT S(6N5 /4T GI3go 14No 66774 A-#j4 LYtJOALE.
OUjZ NEI(,1413 ?ZHOOm tS (3C-IM6- USC--n As S66nTcur 6Y Tt2q FFlc sCc4clNCr 7-6 001D
THE Sl6NHC. AT 6SZ1-I A7Jo LymC61.E . A-S 7-4( rta Aeu:. SCJeaAL srn,44-.. CI41LDIZ&O IN 7WIS
)Kclq IA)C' fKE 00NCE-2N C 0 Gy 77f IN CrZ(5t }SC0 IN ,"7. .S PCR-- D1 J'G- 77LA FF)C . 570fk ( w6c
Tiwcl-s ff"C- USED Ours 57I2(=c-Ps A-A0 cie jgae (-0nI6CrLNC1) A-WLLi-tlfjY-1ASC&ERSG IN 78 IS
TPAAFF« n R-0E POTENTI&C /ay 714-E NC-w 1C-m&er 57me - M,? TNt /tvTirzc7sr of OurZ
y0Up06- PeoeCC &X"'- 45K FM 7V?SC S16&)S M t-?P SLOW t}n10 LOU IT T7z.r4FF1C: .
N M&E 4DDrizs s
Kai mQa"? ,H U0 cu s?
7-
(,32,'l 2°l 6 >2A? ID
c, 37 t Mote
' S `??? ?-? ??? ???-,.. ? ? of .??-?/ ?? ,?
C-JE, 76 W/0&ZS16,A1ED R.6SI00V 'S of K1CHP16LI), 96QUEsr OF T48 L." lTy
1
THE INSTA[LA-TION of S`lUP S16A]IS iN 0a Z Nc ??N/3aYzttpoD. T46 "&-rI4 -50u7-N car wc'nS
OUA N616H t36?zRmO IS eC--w6- USC-n AS A 5tlfKT(-ur r5Y TXA FRe- sc-C-KiN& Tz) AUOID
THE Sl(oNiiu AT 6S7-I-1 Pmo LYNCgZE . /' S T146ta A-tz SC-Je .AL SM 4LL. CE41 LDIZL49 IN TNIS
/}2114 WC 61ZE C0XE-l NCp Gy T*6 /NCrWzPrSC0 AN-0 -SPGL-p/N'6. 7RA FFIC . 5O/ue L&kGE
Tizucks H c- (45 -D Oulz 5712CGT"S A-40 cid ,cKe CoNe-& NCb A-wLcrA-Ny-7nruz KG /N THIS
TfZAFF« AI}-06 POT&4T(A-c_. /3Y 774-6 NOW IC-MRv?-T' 'S7UXe- rN TH W77-riz(fSr Of Our,,
of (A TH g-ND &ZA) 406. f D (0071 tWb ? ?cT &W. llyze SaG&CsTCO? f}5 w6LC-109s,
60'5SI 3 Ly , 7W6 C sr- c,JEST Cdh,U? n, 6F' (3 rzD.19 .) 4A-fZ&1 4ffT ciz Grz,+AJ D . l,Jc' Rt, so
12EQUE57- FF/Z.01M lNCti1 T DISRA. OF LOAD LIMIT SIGNS ,97G3rZ0 pt-No 6g77q A-tjn L yNnALE .
)ottko& I9EO0U: Gj?E 45W_ rj? 7VC-SC SJ&J5 ?b t4LP SCDW tgt,10 L VU IT 'T2t} FFI C_ .
1
Z
4
5
J
P- DDrzes S III
63 () S, &,^6( (-,, -) ?.
k Cif? S
Q
tD
cI
i?
1S
?t
&?3 C/ 6?- of czee- S -
0
L
55V 7- -3
0
.2,91I W70h SF
9CUI)IM 1 , ) 9 7 9
)
C?lave, -zo do z- c, Aar Cm a, cx?
"rh
t aovY L. O? et,? w?4z-c, i.Q i L p? 70
-'
i d? -LV cii ,a icuc? anyc v2 a vw(
"-dLz
Q
'
Akn,
44y-
o72.E
/ 0.9, J
o
b
4?6?
'o--L
0
0
OFFICE OF CRIME ANALYSIS
72nd & Bloomington Avenue 77th & 14th Avenue
1972 - 1 1972 - 2
1973 - 1 1973 - 0
1974 - 0 1974 - 2
1975- 1 1975 - 2
1976 - 0 1976 - 1
1977 - 1 1977 - 2
1978 - 1 1978 - 2
1979,(through 9-19-79) - 3 1979,(through 9-19-79) -1
Total: 5 Total: 13
64th & Grand Avenue 70th & Xerxes Avenue
1972 - 1 1972 - 1
• 1973 - 0 1973 - 1
1974 - 0 1974 - 1
1975 - 0 1975 - 0
1976 - 0 1976 - 2
1977 - 0 1977 - 2
1978 - 0 1978 - 0
1979,(through 9-19-79) - 1 1979,(through 9-19-79) -1
Total: 2 Total: 8
64th & Harriet Avenue
1972 - 0
1973 - 0
1974 - 0
1975- 0
1976 - 0
1977 - 1
1978 - 0
1979,(through 9-19-79) - 0
Total: 1
LE
1
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices lists four criteria or
warrants that should be reviewed in considering two-way stop sign install-
ations. These criteria are:
I s
1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where
application of the normal right-of-way is unduly hazardous.
Where total traffic entering an intersection averages 500 cars
for a 24-hour period the street with the larger volume should be
classified as the main road and stop signs shall be installed
stopping traffic on the minor street.
2. Street entering a through highway or street. It is recommended
that this warrant remain as is. An example of this type of warrant
application would be where residential streets enter into 76th
Street, Nicollet Avenue, Lyndale Avenue, etc.
3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. It is recommended
that this warrant remain as is.
4. Other intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted
view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by
the stop sign. High speed shall mean where one street is posted
in excess of 30 miles an hour or where public safety department
radar checks indicate that a substantial number of people driving
are exceeding the 30 mile per hour speed limit. Serious accident
record shall mean three accidents in a twelve month period or
five accidents in a 24-month period.
Four-way or Multi-way Stop Signs
The Manual on Uniform Control Devices lists three criteria or warrants
that should be reviewed in considering four-way or multi-way stop sign in-
stallations. These criteria or warrants are:
1. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported
accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multi-way
stop installation in a 12-month period. Such accidents include
right and left turn collisions as well as right angle collisions.
2. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches
must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average
day, and
3. Potential obstructions and/or other street geometric problems that affect
the safety of an intersection.
lcp-
0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 287
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolutions Approving 1979 Revised Budget, 1980
Proposed Budget, and Cancelling Tax Levies
At their September 18, 1979 budget hearing, the city council
concluded review of the 1979 revised and 1980 proposed budgets,
and requested that an item be scheduled on the September 24, 1979
city council agenda providing for adoption of the resolutions nec-
essary to implement the 1979 budget revision and 1980 proposed
budget, certifying the necessary tax levies to support the 1980
budget, and authorizing transfers from various improvement bond and
debt service funds to cancel scheduled tax levies.
Copies of those resolutions are attached to this council
letter for your review.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Department Directors
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1980
AND LEVYING TAXES
•
BE IT RESOLVP,D by the City Council of the City of Richfield
as follows:
Section 1: The budget for the City of Richfield for the year
1980 is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for
each of the departmentsto be as follows:
GENERAL FUND
Mayor-Council $ 403,739
Executive 153,511
Administrative Services 471,025
Community Development 320,329
Public Safety 2,717,789
Community Services 2,367,117
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $6,433,510
REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND $ 205,390
Section 2: The estimated gross revenue of the City of Richfield
from all sources, including general ad valorem tax levies as
• hereinafter set forth for the year 1980, including prior years'
levies budgeted for 1980, as the same are more fully detailed
in the City Manager's official copy of the 1980 budget, are
hereby found and determined to be as follows:
GENERAL FUND $6, 433,510
REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND $ 205,390
Section 3: There is hereby levied upon all taxable property
in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year
1979, payable in 1980, for the following purposes and in the
following amounts:
PURPOSE
GENERAL FUND*
AMOUNT
$2,946,326
*Provision has been made in the General Fund for
the payment of the City's contributory share to
Public Employees Retirement Association and the
Police and Firemen's Relief Associations. Provision
has also been made in the General Fund revenues
for receipt of the local government aid distribution.
The above general levv includes a debt service levv
in the amount of $250,000 for Bonds of 1
• 1978. See separate resolutions on other
Resolution No. -2-
Section 4: The budget for the Housing a
of Richfield,for the year 1980 is hereby
There is here y levied upon all taxable
Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the
1980, for the fo,llowing purposes:
nd Redevelopment Authority
ratified and approved. •
property in the City of
year 1979, payable in
PURPOSE \/ AMOUNT
Housing and?Redevelopment 1/3 Mill
Authority Relocation Informa-
tion, service s and Assistance 1/30 Mill
Section 5: A certified copy of this resolution shall be trans-
mitted to the County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST: •
Sylvia Bergh Acting City Clerk
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 1979
BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
r?
LJ
•
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5966 appropriated funds for personal
services, other expenses and capital outlays for
each department of the City for the year 1979; and
WHEREAS, Resolutions Nos. 6016, 6010, 6048, 6055, 6063 and
6068 made appropriations from the 1979 Contingency
Account to various departments; and
WHEREAS, The City Charter, Chapter 7, Section 7.09, gives the
Council authority to transfer unencumbered appropriation
balances from one office, department, or agency to
another within the same fund at the request of the
City Manager; and
WHEREAS, The City Manager has requested a revision of the 1979
budget appropriations in accordance with Charter
provisions and as detailed in the proposed 1980 budget
document.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1: That the 1979 appropriations for each department
of the General Fund be amended to establish the
following totals:
GENERAL FUND
Mayor-Council $ 200,828
Executive 164,227
Administrative Services 468,977
Community Development 302,981
Public Safety 2,676,554
Community Services 2,078,940
Encumbrances 26,841
Total General Fund $5,919,348
THE TOTAL DECREASE IS $ 119,079
Section 2: Estimated 1979 gross revenue of the City of
Richfield from all sources, as the same are more
fully detailed in the City Manager's official copy
of the proposed 1980 budget document, are hereby
revised as follows:
GENERAL FUND
$ 37,736 Increase
10
Resolution No. -2-
Section 3: That the City Manager and the Finance Director
bring into effect the provisions of this resolution. •
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesot'
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh Acting City Clerk
•
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER FROM WATER UTILITY
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1960 AND CANCELLING
LEVIES OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1960
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2862 provided for taxes to be levied for the
payment of principal and interest on the Improvement Bonds
of 1960, 'and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem tax
levy to be levied in 1979 by reason of transfer from the
Water Utility Fund and that there are currently remaining
sufficient funds available in the debt redemption fund to
pay all remaining principal and interest on such bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $146 from'the Water
Utility Fund to the Improvement Bonds of 1960 Fund is hereby
authorized and directed.
2. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in 1980
on Resolution No. 2862 in the amount of $2,750 is hereby
cancelled.
• 3. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin
County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFERS FROM IMPROVEMENT BONDS
OF 1960 AND WATER UTILITY FUNDS TO IMPROVEMENT BONDS
. OF 1961 FUND AND REDUCING CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2624 provided for the sale of $1,155,000 Improvement
Bonds of 1961 and provided for taxes to be levied for the repayment
of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem tax levies
to be levied in 1979 to the extent that such reduction is possible
by reason of transfers from the Improvement Bonds of 1960 Fund, and
the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, Such transfer from the Improvement Bonds of 1960 shall be from surplus
monies not needed for the payment of principal and interest in that
fund, and
WHEREAS, Such transfers shall be charged to the Water Utility-Fund, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirements include a 5% excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $14,255 from the
Improvement Bonds of 1960 Fund to the Improvement Bonds
• of 1961 Fund is hereby authorized and directed.
2. That the transfer and appropriation.of $13,295 from the
Water Utility Fund to the Improvement Bonds of 1961 is
hereby authorized and directed.
3. That the amount to be.levied in 1979, collectible in
1980, on Resolution No. 2624 in the amount of $29,000
is hereby cancelled.
4. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER FROM WATER UTILITY FUND
• TO WATER BONDS OF 1961 FUND AND REDUCING CERTAIN AD VALOREM
TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution 2624 provided for the sale of $120,000 Water Bonds
of 1961 and provided for taxes to be levied for the repayment
of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem tax
levy to be levied in 1979 to the extent that such reduction
is possible by reason of transfer from the Water Utility Fund,
and
WHEREAS, Such transfer shall be charged to the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess
provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $10,450 from the
Water Utility Fund to the Water Bonds of 1961 is hereby
authorized and directed.
2. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in
1980 on Resolution No. 2624, in the amount of $11,000
is hereby cancelled.
3. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFERS FROM IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1959,
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1960 AND WATER UTILITY FUNDS TO IMPROVEMENT
BONDS OF 1962 FUND AND REDUCING CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2726 provided for the sale of $2,500,000 Improvement
Bonds of 1962 and provided for taxes to be levied for the repayment
of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem tax levies
to be levied in 1979 to the extent that such reduction is possible
by reason of transfers from the Improvement Bonds of 1959 Fund, the
Improvement Bonds of 1960 Fund and the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, There is presently sufficient funds available in the Improvement
Bonds of 1959 Fund and the Improvement Bond of 1960 Fund to pay all
remaining principal and interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, Such transfer from the Improvement Bonds of 1959 Fund and from the
Improvment Bonds of 1960 Fund shall be surplus monies not needed for
the payment of principal and interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, Such transfer shall be charged to the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
• Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $9,500 from the
Improvement Bonds of 1959 Fund to the Improvement Bonds
of 1962 Fund is hereby authorized and directed.
2. That the transfer and appropriation of $13,559 from the
Improvement Bonds of 1960 Fund to the Improvement Bonds
of 1962 Fund is hereby authorized and directed.
3. That the transfer and appropriation of $12,542 from the
Water Utility Fund to the Improvement Bonds of 1962 Fund
is hereby authorized and directed.
4. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in
1980 on Resolution No. 2726, in the amount of $37,475
is hereby cancelled.
5. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin
County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
i
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER FROM WATER UTILITY FUND
TO WATER BONDS OF 1962 FUND AND
. REDUCING CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2877 provided for the sale of $1,500,000 Water
Bonds of 1962 and provided for taxes to be levied for the
repayment of principal and interest thereof, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem tax
levy to be levied in 1979 to the extent that such reduction
is possible by reason of transfer from the Water Utility Fund,
and
WHEREAS, Such transfer shall be charged to the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirements includes a 5% excess
provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $98,990 from the
Water Utility Fund to the Water Bonds of 1962 Fund is
hereby authorized and directed.
2. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in
. 1980 on Resolution No. 2877, in the amount of $104,200
is hereby cancelled.
3. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER FROM WATER UTILITY FUND
TO WATER BONDS OF 1963 FUND AND
REDUCING CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3079 provided for the sale of $1,700,000 Water
Bonds of 1963 and provided for taxes to be levied for the
payment of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem tax
levy to be levied in 1979 to the extent that such reduction
is possible by reason of transfer from the Water Utility
Fund, and
WHEREAS, Such transfer shall be charged to the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $117,135 from
the Water Utility Fund to the Water Bonds of 1963
Fund is hereby authorized and directed.
2. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in
1980, on Resolution No. 3079, in the amount of $123,300
• is hereby cancelled.
3. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin
County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER FROM WATER UTILITY FUND
. TO IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1965 FUND AND REDUCING CERTAIN
AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3442 provided for the sale of $2,000,000
Improvement Bonds of 1965 and provided for taxes to be
levied for the payment of principal and interest thereon,
and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such ad valorem
tax levy to the extent that such reduction is possible
by reason of transfer from the Water Utility Fund, and
WHEREAS, Such transfer shall be charged to the Water Utility Fund,
and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce such remaining
ad valorem tax levy to be levied in 1979 by reason that
there are currently sufficient funds available in the
debt redemption fund to pay in 1980 the principal and
interest on the above bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess
provision.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the transfer and appropriation of $20,000 from
the Water Utility Fund to the Improvement Bonds of
1965 Fund is hereby authorized and directed.
2. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in
1980 on Resolution No. 3442 in the amount of $110,700
is hereby cancelled.
3. That a copy of this resolution be sent to the Hennepin
County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
•
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM
• TAX LEVIES ON IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1967 FUND AND
REDUCING CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 3901 provided for the sale of $275,000 Improvement
Bonds of 1967 and provided for taxes to be levied for the payment
of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce ad valorem tax levies to
be levied in 1979 due to the extent that such reduction is possible
by reason of substantial prepayment of special assessments and the
interest return on these funds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess provision.
NO9, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the amount levied in 1979, collectible in 1980,
on Resolution No. 3901 in the amount of $3,500 is
hereby cancelled.
2. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
0 Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
0 OF THE REDEVELOPMENT BONDS OF 1977
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5752 provided for the sale of $4,700,000
Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 and provided for taxes to be
levied for the payment of principal and interest thereon,
and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce certain ad valorem
tax levies to be levied in 1979 due to the funds on hand
from tax increments from the Project Area exceed the amount
necessary to pay principal and interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess
provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in
1980 on Resolution No. 5752 in the amount of $139,400
is hereby cancelled.
2. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
is Hennepin County Auditor.
this
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A PARTIAL REDUCTION
• OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES
OF THE REFUNDING BONDS OF 1978
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5836 provided for the sale of $6,500,000 Refunding
Bonds of 1978 and provided for taxes to be levied for the payment
of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. certified an ad valorem tax levy in 1979 of
$29,997 for payment of principal and interest on the Refunding
Bonds of 1978, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to reduce certain ad valorem tax levies to
be levied in 1979 due to the extent that such reduction is possible
by reason of substantial pre-payment of special assessments and the
investment return on these funds, and
WHEREAS, There is presently funds available in the Refunding Bonds of 1978
Fund to pay current principal and interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5% excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the amount to be levied in 1979, collectible in 1980,
• on Resolution No. 5852 in the amount of $200,103 is hereby
cancelled.
2. That the amount of $29,997 be levied for 1979 for collection
in 1980.
3. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin
County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 286
Agenda September 24, 19
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Authorization to Sell Certain Real Property
•
In April, 1978, the city advertised for the sale of several
lots in the New Ford Town area. On May 22, 1978, the city council
authorized the sale of Lot 4, Block 13 (6413 22nd Avenue) to
Steven and Sheryl Rosen, in the amount of $8,400. After that
authorization to sell the property was granted, the staff discov-
ered a flaw in the title to Lot 4 and the Rosen's withdrew their
offer to purchase the property. Since then, the title defect has
been corrected, but in the meantime, the Rosens have purchased
another home in Bloomington, and it has become necessary to re-ad-
vertise for sale of this property.
The lot was advertised for sale in one edition each of the
Minneapolis Tribune, Richfield Sun, Twin Cities Courier, and the
Minneapolis Spokesman. Request-for-proposal packets were mailed
out to 55 people. The request for proposals format was that prev-
iously approved by the city council, and provides that a potential
purchaser must meet the following criteria:
1. A house must be either built or moved onto the lot;
2. The construction or site preparations must begin
within two months of the closing date;
3. The house must be completed within 8 months of the
closing date;
4. If resold, the house must sell for more than $42,500;
5. The house must have at least three bedrooms.
'
One proposal for purchase of the lot was received, from Dorothy
F. Norton in the amount of $8,000. Ms. Norton proposes to build
a one and one-half story Cape Cod style house, with three bedrooms,
on the lot. Her proposal would meet the criteria described above.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the sale to Dorothy F. Norton of Lot 4, Block
13, in the amount of $8,000.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
cc: Acting Finance Director City Manager
Tanning & Redevelopment Director
;J
Resolution No.
Resolution Authorizing Sale of
Certain Real Property
Lot 4, Block 13, New Ford Town
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield authorized the advertising
and acceptance of informal proposals on March 27, 1978, for the
sale of Lot 4, Block 13, New Ford Town, and,
WHEREAS, subsequent to the March 27, 1978, action a title flaw
prevented transfer of title, and,
WHEREAS, recent legislation has now corrected that title flaw,
and,
WHEREAS, informal.proposals were again solicited for the purchase
of this lot, and,
WHEREAS, an informal proposal was received in the below-stated
amount,
NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Richfield, Minnesota, that the City Manager be granted authority
to execute the sale of the following lot at the following price with
the covenant provisions that a house be built or moved onto the
lot, be completed within eight months of the closing date, have a
resale value of more than $42,500 and contain at least three bedrooms.
Lot 4, Block 13, New Ford Town to Dorothy F.
Norton in the amount of $8,000.00
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 24th day of September, 1979.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Loren L. Law Mayor
t
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 285
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Amending Community Health Services
Agreement with Hennepin County
There is an item on the September 24, 1979 city council
agenda providing for council adoption of a resolution authorizing
amendment of the 1979 contract between the City of Richfield and
Hennepin County, for the provision of community health services.
A copy of the proposed amendment, and a letter from the county
community health department, explaining this amendment, are attached.
Basically, the attached amendment provides that Richfield will
receive $2,716 more money through the Community Health Services Act
in 1979 than originally budgeted. Of this money, $184 is being re-
turned to the city as an actual reflection of the costs associated
with the vaccine program. Richfield's 1979 vaccine program costs
were actually $816, rather than the $1,000 that had been budgeted.
The remaining cash derives from a 7% funding increase in the CHS
subsidy program, which was implemented on July 1, 1979.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the
contract amendments.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Finance Director
Environmental Health Director
•
•
0
COMMUNITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
4th Floor, McGill Building ~
NNE 50,
501 Park Avenue
HENNEPIN Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
September 6, 1979
Mr. I. Roesler
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Mr. Roesler:
Enclosed is an amendment to the 1979 contract between the City of Richfield and
Hennepin County for the provision of Community Health Services. Two clauses of
the original contract are amended:
1. The amount of direct assistance withheld for vaccine has been
adjusted to the 1979 actual. Because Hennepin County is
participating in the National Immunization Initiative, the
Minnesota Department of Health has set a maximum dollar amount
that must be paid for vaccine supplied to County agencies. Thus, it
is possible to calculate exactly each unit of government's share of
1979 vaccine charges. Richfield's share is $816 or $184 less than
was budgeted in the 1979 Plan. The enclosed amendment increases
total cash payments by the above difference. No change in your
Plan is needed, although you should reflect the additional financial
assistance on the quarterly expenditure reports.
2. Total cash payments to the City are also increased by $2,532, the
seven percent increase recently allocated to the City for the last
half of 1979.
Would you please have all three copies of the amendment signed and returned to
me. Also, please attach to the amendment a certified copy of your City Council's
action authorizing the amendment and its execution by the appropriate officials.
If you have any questions, please cGll me at 348-4382.
Sincerely, -? (-- /, _ IL ,
Sue Zuidema
SZ:kmb
Enclosure
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
S FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT No. 90047
THIS AGREEMENT, Made between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as County, and the CITY OF RICHFIELD, State
of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as Municipality.
It is hereby agreed that that certain agreement, made and entered into on the
6th day of March, 1979, and bearing Agreement No. 90047, between the herein-
named parties covering the provision of Community Health Services is hereby
amended in accordance with the provisions set forth below:
Paragraph 2, Section b, of the original Agreement shall be amended to read:
b. The Municipality agrees to use its Community Health Services subsidy to
offset 3.3 percent of the cost of vaccines supplied by the Minnesota
Department of Health to Hennepin County agencies and providers as
described in Exhibit A, such Exhibit being incorporated into and made a
part of this Agreement. The Municipality further agrees $816 shall be
deleted by the Minnesota Department of Health from cash payments to
the Municipality for the expected proportional cost of vaccine.
Variances between actual proportional share and expected proportional
share shall be reconciled by an additional or decreased annual subsidy in
the following year.
Paragraph 2, Section d, of the original Agreement shall be amended to read:
d. The total cash payments to the Municipality for Community Health
Services shall not exceed $74,051.
This Agreement shall be effective from date of approval of this Amendment
through expiration of Agreement No. 90047, December 31, 1979.
Except as hereinabove amended, the terms, conditions and provisions of said
Agreement No. 90047, dated March 6, 1979, shall remain in full force and effect.
Municipality, having signed this Amendment to Agreement No. 90047, and the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Amendment on
0
1979, and pursuant to such approval and the proper
County officials having signed this Amendment, the parties hereto agree to be
bound by the provisions herein set forth.
Upon proper execution, this Amendment COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
will be legally valid and binding upon STATE OF MINNESOTA
date of approval.
Assistant County Attorney
Date 2- c] _ ? q
By
Chair of its County Board
Approved as to Execution
Assistant County Attorney
Date
By
Deputy County Administrator
ATTEST:
Deputy County Auditor
CITY OF RICHFIELD
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By
Its
By.
is
City organized under:
Plan A Plan B Charter
U
0
0
-2-
RESOLUTION NO.
•
•
RESOLUTION AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield does provide environmental
and personal health services to Richfield residents, and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has developed a community
health service plan to provide for those services, and
WHEREAS, the community health service plan does address
the community health needs of Richfield residents, and
WHEREAS, funding for this community health service plan is
provided through the state and county CHS subsidy program toward
support of the services described in the plan, and
WHEREAS, the agreement between the City of Richfield and
Hennepin County which provides for Richfield's receipt of that
subsidy for community health services is dated March 6, 1979.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Richfield that the above dated agreement No. 90047,
is hereby amended to increase the subsidy amount in accordance
with actual 1979 funding available from Hennepin County to the
City of Richfield.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are
authorized to execute such amendments to said contract on behalf
of the City of Richfield.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
24th day of September, 1979.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
0
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 284
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Execution of Utility Easement with Financial
Properties Developers, Inc.
One of the stipulations of the development agreement between
the Richfield HRA and Financial Properties Developers, Inc., the
K-Mart developer, provided that Financial Properties provide the
City of Richfield a utility easement in the old Grand Avenue area
• which would allow the city to provide water and sewer service to N.W.
Bell Telephone Company from 65th Street. We have recently received
the executed utility easement from Financial Properties Developers
Inc., which would provide for a perpetual easement for sanitary
sewer and water purposes on the K-Mart site, and a copy of that
easement is attached.
It is recommended that the city council authorize the mayor and
city manager to execute this easement agreement with Financial Prop-
erties Developers, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
i
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: City Attorney
Planning & Redevelopment Director
Acting Public Works Director
0
I J
l
a79
MCI*
DEVELOPERSINC.
5825 GLENRIDGE DR., N.E., BUILDING 2, SUITE 202 e ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30328 ® 404/252-8220
September 5, 1979
Mr. Richard C. Krier, AICP
Planning & Redevelopment Director
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Dear Dick:
Enclosed you will find an executed easement for the utilities
that were remaining on our property. It appears to me that the
City should also execute this agreement since they are accepting
certain responsibilities.
Sincerely,
IAL PROPERTIES DEVELOPERS INC.
James T. Murphy
Treasurer
JM:jh
enc
•
EASEMENT
0 THI?$, AGRE MENT made and entered into this day of
1979, by and between Financial Properties Developers,
Inc., a Georgia Corporation, hereinafter first party, and the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, hereinafter
second party.
WITNESSETH: That the first party in consideration of the sum
of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, to it in
hand paid by said second party, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, does hereby grant and convey to said second party the
following perpetual easement:
Description of Parcel: Lot 1, Block 1, Heyman Addition, accord-
ing to the plat thereof on file and on record in the office of the
Registrar of. Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Description of Easement:
A perpetual easement for storm sewer, sanitary sewer and water
purposes over, under and across the following described portion of
the above-described parcel:
. Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, thence West
150 feet along the North line of Lot 1 to the actual point of
beginning; thence South and _. parallel to the East line of Lot
1 a distance of 284 feet, thence East and parallel to the
North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 25 feet more or less
to the East line of said Lot 1; thence South along the East
line of said Lot 1 a distance of 16 feet; thence West and
parallel to the North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 59 feet;
thence North and parallel to the East line to a point on the
North line of said Lot 1, 34 feet, more or less West of the
point of beginning; thence East along the North line of Lot 1
a distance of 34 feet more or less to the point of beginning
and there terminating.
The granting of this easement by the first party and its
acceptance by the second party is subject to the following conditions:
(a) Second party shall repair or replace in kind and quality
any damage to paving, curbing, guttering, landscaping or other
improvements caused by the exercise of the rights granted hereby;
(b) Second party shall indemnify and hold harmless the firs;tt}?
party, its agents, employees, successors and assigns from all 21
•
liabilities, claims or damages to any person or property resulting
from the exercise of the rights granted hereby.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the first party has set its hand and
seal the day and year first above written.
FI
V? mac-d?° By
Witness
Witness
PROPERTIES DEVELOPERS, INC.
Its
is
. STATE OF GEORGIA)
ss.
COUNTY OF FULTON)
The foregoing instrument was.arknowledged before me this day
of - 1979, by and G
?`? of FINANCIAL' PROPERTIES DEVELOPERS:; INC., a Georgia
Corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
i%
Z:.' .y ;. -ZL
'Notary Public
P40',ry P??b!'. - at ??xJ.?
:.•-..n?Lr11?,
Mw
Commission Expires
•
•
7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
•
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 283
Agenda September 24, 1979
Subject: Authorization to Advertise for Demolition Bids
Jerry's Standard Station 66th and Lyndale
(Plat 45365, Parcel 4100)
There is an item on the September 24, 1979 city council
agenda requesting council authorization to advertise for bids to
demolish the Jerry's Standard Station property, located on the
southwest corner of the 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue intersection.
Demolition of this property is necessary to enable the Lyndale
Avenue improvement project to be implemented in the spring of
1980, as scheduled. A portion of the Jerry's Standard property
will be used for sidewalk and bus turnout lanes that are to be
constructed as part of the Lyndale improvement project. The estim-
ated demolition cost for this property, which will be covered by
the project, is $9,100.
It is the recommendation of the acting public works director,
in which I concur, that the city council authorize the advertise-
ment for bids to complete this demolition work.
Respectfully submitted,
K?J
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Public Works Director
Planning & Redevelopment Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 282
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf field
Council 1,:embers :
Subject: Certification of Delinquent Sewer and
Water Utility Accounts
There is a resolution on the September 24, 1979 city council
agenda designating the annual accumulation of unpaid sewer and
water utility accounts.
Although the Richfield utility ordinance places unpaid water
and sewer charges as a lien against the property, some homeowners
have traditionally chosen to have the charges certified and included
in their annual property tax billing. A $10.00 Certification Charge
(preparation for certification to taxes of delinquent accounts)
shall be charged against each delinquent account as authorized by
Ordinance 8.12, subd. 12.
The attached resolution represents those delinquent accounts
which have occurred from August 30, 1978 through August 30, 1979.
It is recommended that the city council adopt this resolution
certifying delinquent water and sewer accounts.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Finance Director
9
{
r
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING UNPAID SEWER AND WATER SERVICE
CHARGES TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO BE COLLECTED
WITH OTHER TAXES ON SAID PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 8.23 establishes rules, rates and charges for water
service in the City of Richfield, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 44.075, Subd. 3, provides that all delinquent
water service charges not paid may be certified to the County Auditor with the
taxes against such property, and shall be collected with other taxes on such
property, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 8.12 establishes rules, rates and charges for
sanitary sewer service in the City of Richfield, and
WHEREAS, Subd. 12 thereof provides that all sewer service charges not paid
within fifteen (15) days after the quarterly due date may be certified to the
County Auditor with taxes against such property, and shall be collected with
other taxes on such property, and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll has been prepared specifying the amounts which
shall be certified against each particular property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
• Minnesota, that
1. There is hereby determined to be a total uncollected amount
for water and sanitary sewer service of $56,869.67.
2. That a $10 Certification Charge shall be levied against each
delinquent account; such charges totaling $11,270.
3. That such amount is hereby certified to the County Auditor
for collection with other taxes on said properties.
4. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the Hennepin
County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 24th day of
September, 1979.
ATTEST:
Loren L. Law Mayor
0 Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 281
Agenda September 24, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Assessment Rolls for Diseased Tree, Nuisance
Abatement and Weed Destruction
There are several resolutions on the September 24, 1979 city
council agenda certifying special assessments to Hennepin County.
These resolutions provide for the following certification:
1. Resolution certifying special assessments for weed
destruction. This is a one-year assessment at 8%
penalty.
2. Resolution levying special assessments for nuisance
abatement. This is a one-year assessment at no in-
terest or penalty.
3. Resolution levying special assessments for abatement
of diseased tree. This is the assessment roll for
diseased tree removal on private property which has
been performed by the city at the request of the
property owner. The assessment is certified at the
city's actual cost of the tree removal, less the
amount of the city and state subsidy for which the
removal qualifies. The subsidy provides for a maxi-
mum of $100 or 50% of theremoval costs, whichever is
less, per tree. This assessment is spread over three
years at the rate of 8% per annum.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the resolutions
certifying these special assessments.
Respectfully submitted,
I
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Finance Director
RESOLUTION NO.
0 RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR WEED DESTRUCTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the following described properties are hereby specially assessed
in the following amounts for expenses incurred by the City in connection with
abatement for weed destruction pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
1969, Chapter 715, Se. 17.271, to-wit:
PROPERTY ID ADDRESS AMOUNT
32-028-24 11 0005 7032 Penn Avenue $ 45.00
28-028-24 32 0063 6637 Penn Avenue 15.00
28-028-24 33 0149 6945 Penn Avenue 25.00
28-028-24 11 0037 6300 Lyndale Avenue 30.00
29-028-24 42 0082 6716 Washburn Avenue 15.00
28-028-24 11 0013 6399 Aldrich Avenue 57.50
28--028-24 11 0012 6399 Aldrich Avenue 57.50
33-028-24 32 0042 7515 Penn Avenue 41.19
28-028-24 21 0004 6345 Irvin; Avenue 52.50
26-028-24 32 0003 6600 Columbus Avenue 10.00
34-028-24 23 0097 7244 Garfield Avenue 10.00
29-082-24 14 0020 6400 Penn Avenue 25.00
34-028-24 13 0147 7240 Third Avenue 10.00
34-028-24 12 0118 7134 Third Avenue 20.00
35-028-24- 33 0008 7733 Portland Avenue 20.00
25-028-24 24 0027 2220 E. 66th Street 15.00
27-028-24 32 0018 307 W. 66th Street 20.00
25-028-24 22 0002 6311 Cedar Avenue 10.00
27-028-24 41 0090 6701 - 4th Avenue 25.00
29-028-24 44 0031 6841 Russell Avenue 25.00
Total 528.69
2. That the above listed assessments be spread over a period of one year
at the rate of 8% interest per annum.
3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a
copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
24th day of September, 1979.
ATTEST:
Loren L. Law Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh Actin; City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
0
0
RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The following described properties are hereby specially assessed
in the following amounts for expenses incurred by the City in connection
with abatement of a nuisance health hazard pursuant to the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.23, to-wit:
PROPERTY ID
29-028-24 14 0020
28-028-24 21 0004
29-028-24 41 0086
28-028-24 12 0044
26-028-24 41 0004
35-028-24 32 0110
28-028-24 21 0057
27-028-24 13 0064
34-028-24 12 0118
29-028-24 41 0009
28-028-24 22 0104
Total
ADDRESS AMOUNT
6400 Penn Avenue $119.62
6345 Irving Avenue 30.00
6729 Thomas Avenue 18.10
6327 Humboldt Avenue 30.70
6601 Bloomington Avenue 34.10
7414 Park Avenue 15.00
6300 Humboldt Avenue 20.00
6525 Nicollet Avenue 20.00
7132-34 - 3rd Avenue 20.00
6644 Penn Avenue 38.50
6314 Newton 48.22
394.24
2. The above special assessments are to be spread over one year at
no interest.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a
copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
24th day of September, 1979.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
0
Y
• r
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR ABATEMENT OF DISEASED TREES
WHEREAS, Ordinance Code 4.11 establishes rules and regulations with reference
to the abatement of diseased trees on private property in the City of Richfield by
tree removal, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 429.101 provides that all unpaid or special
charges for such tree removal may be certified to the County Auditor with the
taxes against such property, and shall be collected with other taxes on such
property, and
WHEREAS, an assessment roll has been prepared specifying the amounts which
shall be certified against each particular property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield
as follows:
1. That the following described properties are hereby specially assessed
in the following amounts for expenses incurred by the City in connection with
abatement or removal of diseased trees pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.101:
PROPERTY ID ADDRESS AMOUNT
29-028-24 44 0046 6820 Russell Avenue $ 57.76
26-028-24 33 0107 6817 Portland Avenue 194.24
28-028-24 24 0115 6514 Irving Avenue 52.71
33-028-24 23 0096 7349 Penn Avenue 130.72
26-028-24 41 0066 6614 - 18th Avenue 62.75
33-028-24 14 0077 7120 Lyndale Avenue 67.97
28-028-24 21 0087 6301 James Avenue 104.62
28-028-24 42 0048 6609 Humboldt Avenue 60.50
25-028-24 23 0117 6401 - 20th Avenue 241.86
28-028-24 21 0072 6309 Irving Avenue 137.81
25-028-24 23 0119 6409 - 20th Avenue 504.17
34-028-24 42 0080 7501 Nicollet Avenue 151.25
25-028-24 24 0105 6445 Standish Avenue 176.46
33-028-24 41 0139 7544 Aldrich Avenue 115.96
25-028-24 24 0104 6437 Standish Avenue 630.20
33-028-24 22 0117 7126 Oliver Avenue 74.11
28-028-24 42 0060 6709 Emerson Avenue 403.34
34-028-24 23 0002 7333 Grand Avenue 75.63
33-028-24 14 0089 7225 Aldrich Avenue 302.50
25-028-24 24 0100 6417 Standish Avenue 181.50
Total 53,726,06
0
Resolution No. -2-
2. That the above listed assessments be spread over a period of three
years at the rate of 8% interest per annum on the unpaid balances.
3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a
copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
24th day of September, 1979.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
?1