10-22-79 agenda- - I r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, 11INNESOTA
Office of City Tlanager
Council Letter No. 339
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
s
Subject: Authorization to Execute Agreement
Designating Deputy Registrar
Thera is an item on the October 22, 1979 city council
agenda providing for council authorization to execute an agree-
ment with Hennepin County which would designate the City of
Richfield as a motor vehicle deputy registrar.
The City of Richfield has served as a deputy registrar for
Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota for many years. Up
• until July, 1979, the city clerk/finance director was designated
as the City of Richfield's deputy registrar. However, with the
death of the incumbent in that position, the city lost its
designated deputy registrar, and it has become necessary to re-
designate a motor vehicle deputy registrar. Since the city
made this designation, Hennepin County has changed their procedure
and now requires that the City of Richfield be the designated
deputy registrar, rather than a specific individual or employee
position. The county has also requested that the city execute
a contract agreement with them providing for this designation
and duties of the deputy registrar. The city attorney has re-
viewed this agreement and determined that it is in legally
acceptable form. The duties described for the deputy registrar
in this agreement are duties that are presently being met by the
city licensing division, and the proposed contract agreement is
merely a confirmation of the city's responsibility and authority
to continue service as a deputy registrar.
It is recommended that the city council authorize the city
manager and mayor to execute this ageement with Hennepin County,
thus designating the City of Richfield as a motor vehicle deputy
registrar.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Deputy City Clerk
-jW
..?_ a. ,,.. ,._..._x.?.„?,_. ....<» Contract No.
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into by and between the COUNTY OF
HJENNEPIN, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR";
W I T N E S S E T H:
1 WHEREIN IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. CONTRACTOR, by and through its City Clerk or other
equivalent officer, as the case may be, shall perform the services
of a Motor Vehicle Deputy Registrar within Hennepin County. It shall be
the duty of the CONTRACTOR to:
A. Provide and maintain.a suitable facility and
provide sufficient and competent personnel.to serve the public;
B. Mail or deliver copies of daily reports and copies
f
o
recap sheets to the Hennepin County Director
of Licensing each week so that they are received by
said Director on Monday of each week;
C. Provide the Hennepin County Director of Licensing
with a complete motor vehicle plate and sticker
inventory the first day of each month;
D. Provide the Hennepin.County Director of Licensing
with a complete motor vehicle plate and sticker
inventory prior to the date of appointment of Deputy
Registrar;
E. Complete motor vehicle reports on a daily basis;
F. By the fifth day of each month, provide the
Hennepin County Director of Licensing with a
reconciliation of sales to inventory for the preceding
month;
G. Keep and maintain a registration and motor vehicle
tax collection bureau, to be approved by the
Min
istrar of M
esota Re
V
t
hi
l
n
g
or
o
e
c
es;
H. Keep such records and make such reports to the
Minnesota Registrar of Motor Vehicles as said Registrar may
require from time to time;
I. Collect pertinent taxes and filing fees authorized
by applicable law and fulfill all statutory responsibiiities
regarding the-reporting and depositing of said taxes
and fees;
J. If required by the Minnesota Registrar of Motor
Vehicles, give a bond to the State of Minnesota in
the'sum of $10,000, or such larger sum as may be required
by said Registrar of Motor Vehicles, conditioned upon
CONTRACTOR'S faithful discharge of its duties as Deputy
Registrar.
2. CONTRACTOR agrees that the COUNTY and the Hennepin
County Director of Licensing and any of their duly authorized
representatives and the Minnesota Registrar of.Motor Vehicles, or his
agents, shall, at all times, have access to and the right to inspect,
examine, audit, excerpt and transcribe the records of the CONTRACTOR, as
Deputy Registrar, and also have access to and the right to inspect the
facilities of the CONTRACTOR as Deputy Registrar.
3. Services provided for periodic audits and balancing of
inventories shall be performed at the prevailing hourly rate for
the department of the County performing said service.. Said hourly rate
will include the cost of workers' compensation, insurance and pension
contributions and other fringe.benefits, plus a ten percent (10%) administrative
fee. Payment for such services shall be made by CONTRACTOR within
thirty (30) days after receipt of any bill therefor from the COUNTY.'
4. CONTRACTOR shall give a bond to the COUNTY and the.
Hennepin County Director of Licensing in the sum 'pf $100,000,
conditioned upon the faithful discharge of its duties as a Deputy Registrar.
Said bond shall cover any and all other persons performing for CONTRACTOR
any aspect of the services or responsibilities contemplated under this
?J
0
e
•
Agreement.
5. This Agreement or any part hereof shall not be assigned,
sublet or transferred without the prior written approval of the
'COUNTY.
6. CONTRACTOR agrees that it shall comply with all state
laws, rules and regulations pertaining to the duties and respon-
sibilities of a deputy registrar.
n
7. CONTRACTOR agrees to hold the COUNTY and its officers
(including specifically, but without limitation, the Hennepin
County Director of Licensing) and employees harmless from any,claims,
suits or damages resulting from or caused by any act or omission of the
CONTRACTOR, its agents, contractors of employees in the performance of
the services provided by this Agreement, and against any and all claims,
liens and claims of liens-for labor performed without'authorization of
the governing body of the COUNTY and against all loss by reason of the
failure of said CONTRACTOR, in any respect, to perform fully all statutory
and contractual obligations.
CONTRACTOR further agrees that, in order to protect itself, as well
as the county, under the liability indemnity provision hereinabove set
forth, it will, at all times during the term of this Agreement, have and
keep in force a general liability insurance policy at least in the
amount of $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence for bodily
injury and.$100,000 for property damage. Said policy shall also be
endorsed so as to provide coverage sustained to others as a result of
breach of CONTRACTOR'S duties as a Deputy Registrar. CONTRACTOR further
agrees that it will have and keep in force at all times during the term
of this Agreement an Automobile Liability Insurance Po?icy, if applicable,
at least in the amount of $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence
for bodily injury and $100,000 for property damage. Said policy (or
policies) shall provide that it (they) shall not be cancelled, not
renewed nor materially changed without thirty (30) days' prior notice
thereof to the COUNTY. Such policy (or policies) shall also include
0
contractual liability coverage protecting the COUNTY, its officers
(including specifically, but not limited to, the Hennepin County Director
of Licensing), agents and employees. CONTRACTOR also agrees to carry
full coverage of Workers' Compensation Insurance. A Certificate of
"Insurance for each of the above will be provided by CONTRACTOR to the
COUNTY as stated below. In lieu of carrying the above insurance, CONTRACTOR
may elect to become a self insurer, provided that by date of appointment
of CONTRACTOR as Deputy Registrar, CONTRACTOR shall provide the Director
s
of Licensing either said Certificates of Insurance or written notification
of such election.
8. In accordance with Hennepin County Affirmative Action
Policy and the County Commissioners' policies against discrimination,
no person shall be excluded from full employment rights or participation
in or the benefits of any program, service or activity on the grounds of
race, color, religion, age,-sex, disability, marital status, sexual
orientation, public assistance status, ex-offender status or national
origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal and State
laws against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination.
CONTRACTOR will furnish all information and reports required by Hennepin
County or by Executive Order No. 11246 and Revised Order No. 4 and by
the rules and regulations.and orders of the Secretary of Labor for
' purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules,
regulations and orders.
9. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended
or should be construed in-any manner as creating or establishing
the relationship of co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting
the CONTRACTOR as the agent, representative or employee of the COUNTY
for any purpose or in any manner whatso,_ver. CONTRACTOR is to be and
shall remain an independent contractor with respect tq all services
performed under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR represents that it has, or
will secure at its own expense, all personnel required in performing
services under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of CONTRACTOR or
other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services
required by CONTRACTOR under this Agreement, shall have no contractual •
relationship with the COUNTY or the Hennepin County Director of Licensing
and shall not be considered employees of the COUNTY or the Director of
Licensing and any and all claims that may or might arise under the
Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said
,personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims
whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of
employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims
of discrimination against the'CONTRACTOR, its officers, agents, contractors
ss or employees shall in no way be the ;responsibility of the COUNTY or the
Hennepin County Director of Licensing; and CONTRACTOR sloes hereby hold
the COUNTY and the Director of Licensing harmless from any and all such
claims. Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled
to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the
COUNTY or the Director of Licensing, including, without limitation,
tenure rights, medical and'hospital care, sick and vacation leave,
severance pay and P.E.R.A. and Workers' Compensation pay and disability
pay-
10. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all ,
questions as to the execution, nature, obligation, instruction,
validity and performance of this Agreement.
11. This Agreement shall commence as of that date which is
determined by the Minnesota Registrar of Motor Vehicles to be the
date on which is discontinued by said Registrar as a
Deputy Registrar. If a written notice of discontinuance is presented to
. by the Minnesota Registrar of Motor Vehicles, a copy of
same shall be attached to this Agreement. The appointment of the CONTRACTOR
as a Deputy Registrar, as provided herein, shall be effective when the
Hennepin County Director of Licensing is satisfied that'the requirements
r
set forth in Paragraphs lA and 1D hereof have been met` and said Director
gives written notification to.CONTRACTOR of the effective date of said
appointment; a copy of said notification containing the appointment date
shall be attached to this Agreement and shall be considered to be a part
hereof. Gefore CONTRACTOR shall discharge any of its duties as Deputy
Registrar, CONTRACTOR shall accomplish the taking and subscribing of an
Y
oath to faithfully discharge its duties and to uphold the laws of the
-State of Minnesota. Said oath must be subscribed on a form furnished by
rho COUNTY.
12.. This contract may be terminated by CONTRACTOR giving
sixty days' written notice thereof to the COUNTY and the Hennepin
County Director of Licensing. In accordance with applicable law, the
Hennepin County Director of Licensing, with the approval of the Minnesota
Director of Motor Vehicles, for cause, may discontinue the CONTRACTOR as
a deputy registrar.
It is agreed that in order to maintain continuity of the services
provided by CONTRACTOR as a. deputy registrar, any vacancy that might
occur in the position of City Clerk or pertinent equivalent position of
the shall not alone constitute cause for discontinuance
of CONTRACTOR as a deputy registrar, unless, in the opinion of the
Hennepin County Director of Licensing, with the concurrence of the
Minnesota Director of Motor Vehicles, such vacancy remains for a period
of time which is unreasonable under the circumstances.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and sealed
this Agreement on the 'day of ,-1977.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
By:
Chairmp:, of it County Board
Upon proper execution, this
Agreement will be legally valid
and binding and upon date of And:
approval is in compliance Deputy County Administrator
with all laws relating to the
subject matter thereto.
ATTEST:
Deputy County Auditor
Assistant County. Attorney `
Date: - ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Director of Licensing
Assistant Counytlttor'riey By:
Da to :
And:
its
r
Council Letter No. 338
Agenda October 22, 1979
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and 11
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
i
Subject: Change Orders, Municipal Golf Course
•
0
There are several items on the October 22, 1979 city council
agenda requesting approval of change orders for the municipal
golf course project.
Bud Johnson Construction Company, Inc. is
for the buildings. A proposed change order in
Bud Johnson involves a number of items:
Add hand dryers, exterior post lighting
copper service ,airing-
Add masonry and drywall work for duct re-
the contractor
the contract with
+$ 955
+ 697
60 .
565
+$1 '009
alignment and coved base
Omit ceramic tile base
Omit wiring of pumps
Total change order
Lee Richert Plumbing and Heating, Inc. is the contractor for
water wells and pump equipment. The first part of the proposed
change order in the Richert contract calls for a 70 day extension
of time on the.contract, due to late shipping date of electrical
controls and other equipment. This portion of the change order
does not involve a dollar change in the contract. The second
part of the change order provides for additional wire and conduit
for well hookup, necessitated by well and controller relocation.
The total dollar change for this contract is in the amount of
$90.00.
Evergreen Lawn Sprinkler, Inc. is the automatic irrigation
contractor. The change order in this contract involves two items:
Add two 6" and two 3" zone values +$ 892.62
Rework piping supply to hydrant + 300.00 \?? ?Jw
Total change order +$1 ,1 9 2 . 6 2 ?C...o
l
Council Letter No. 338 -2-
October 22, 1979
The zone valves were bid as an alternate originally, but
the additional control that these valves would give us in oper-
ating the irrigation system makes it desirable to add them now.
The piping provides water supply to the newly seeded areas.
It is recommended that the city council approve these
change orders as outlined.
Respectfully submitted,
/
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja s
cc: Finance Coordinator
Community Services Director
0
0
1_ _J
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. :7
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayot'
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Report on Request for Special Use Permit
6605 First Avenue
At the October 9, 1979 city council meeting, the city council
held a hearing on a special use permit request by Ms. Fe Alveraz
at 6605 First Avenue. At that time the city council de-iied the
special use permit, but requested additional infor:ation from the
city staff concerning allegations that the Alveraz' were misled
concerning their application for a special use permit at this
location.
I talked with Rex Swanson of the realty firm of Real Estate
Ten. Mr. Swanson indicated that he had had contact with the
planning department and the inspection department of the City of
Richfield. Mr. Swanson spoke with the Director of Community De-
velopment directly on this issue. He acknowledges that the Director
of Community Development indicated staff opposition to any rezoning
of this property for commercial purposes. However, Mr. Swanson
feels that he got a favorable response concerning the possibility
of a special use permit at this location. While he was told that
the special use permit would be an item subject to council approval
upon recommendation of the planning commission, he felt that the
impression was given that it was a formality. He indicated, how-
ever, that he was under the impression that the Alveraz' were
asking for the same part time employee status that they had at
their beauty shop on Apple Lane. He acknowledged that he was
aware that a large increase in the business would necessitate a
rezoning from residential to commercial zoning.
Mr. Krier's remembrance of the conversation deviates slightly
from Mr. Swanson's. Mr. Krier feels that he made clear to Mr.
Swanson that a large difference in the use of the property would
require a rezoning to commercial use. He indicated his opposition
to a commercial use on this property. In addition, he indicated
that any additional full time employees other than the homeowner
would require a special use permit to be considered by the city
council. The staff recommendation to the planning commission, as
Council Letter No. 337 -2-
October 22, 1979
well as to the city council, was in opposition to a full time
employee at this location. The Alveraz' had gone through the
special use permit process in order to obtain authorization for
a part time employee on Apple Lane.
It would be my judgment that the city staff objectively
presented the facts concerning this matter to the real estate
firm. The staff's recommendation on the matter have been consistent
throughout the entire process. A breamsdown in clear communications
has resulted in the unfortunate situation which existed at the last
city council meeting. This could lie either on the part of the
property owner hearing only what he/she wanted to hear, representa-
tions by the real estate agent which may not have been totally
representative of the situation, or explanations by the planning
staff which were not as clear as possible. My conversation with
the real estate agent has notified hire of the difficulties involved
with this area and clarified the situation to him for the future.
Hopefully all parties involved are now clear as to the imaplications
of this situation.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
0
KN/ ej a
cc: Acting Planning Director
0
1
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 337
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Proposal for Methodology for Classification
and Compensation Study
The purpose of this council letter is to outline the object-
ives, scope and methodology for conducting a classification and
compensation analysis for all city positions which are not repre-
sented by organized bargaining units.
The need for such a study has become more acute than ever,
• due to the reorganization and the dramatic changes which have
taken place in city programs since the last time the classification
and compensation system was studied in 1970. This study will have
at its focus the following objectives:
1. Developing for the first time specific job descript-
ions for each management and general service employee,
outlining responsibilities and skills needed to
perform each job.
2. Analyzing each position on the basis of some system-
atic format to determine the relative difficulty of
that job in comparison to other positions in this
organization and the external labor market.
3. Grouping specific positions into general classes
based upon similar functions performed, and similar
knowledges required.
4. Establishing pay ranges which recognize internal and
external market relationships so that the city can
attract and retain qualified personnel, as well as
maintain internal equity within the city.
5. Analyzing the concept of progression through our
current pay ranges and modifying if appropriate.
6. Establishing an employee evaluation process based
upon performance rather than traits.
Council Letter No. 337 -2- October 22, 1979
Scope of the Study
The scope of this study would include all fulltime, part-
time, permanent and intermittent personnel whose positions are
similar in nature and would exclude all organized personnel.
The study would involve a total of 104 individual positions in
63 existing job classifications. As a result of the reorganiza-
tion, it is anticipated that two new classes will be established,
city engineer and community development aide. Those classes would.
also need to be included in the study. The breakdown of the
number of positions- and classifications in each major grouping
of employees is shown below:
Group
Top management
Supervisory & Mid-management pos.
General services full time pos.
General services part time perman-
ent positions
Intermittent positions which close
parallel full time positions
No. of No. of Current
Positions Job Classifications
5 5
28 23
61 61
8 4
ly
2 1
Methodology
Due to the internal staff capabilities, the decision has been
made to rely on staff as much as possible and maximize employee
and supervisor involvement. The heavy involvement of the personnel
staff, supervisors and employees will not only lead to a greater
sense of ownership, but also will reduce the costs associated
with a trainer. A trainer will serve as a resource person, train
the management staff on the techniques of job evaluation, and
tailor a job evaluation system to the needs of the city. The
trainer and city manager will rate the five department head posi-
tions, while the management staff and personnel director will rate
the positions in the rest of the organization to achieve internal
equity.
Once the positions have been rated for internal comparability,
the trainer will provide guidance to the personnel staff in deter-
mining market comparability and will provide advice to the manage-
ment staff regarding the structure of the various city pay plans.
The heavy involvement of the city staff in this protect will
necessitate that other work priorities temporarily be shifted
while this project is being implemented. A complete breakdown
of the division of labor between the trainer and city staff is
outlined in Attachment 1.
The project will proceed in two phases, the first is the
classification aspect for the positions. Once that part is
completed, it will be presented to the council for approval. The
Council Letter No. 337 -3-
October 22, 1979
other part of the project involves setting salaries for each
. job level. That portion will also be presented to the city
council for approval when completed. We anticipate that this
project should be completed in the spring of 1930.
Trainer Selection
The city staff has discussed this project with five firms
and individuals specializing in this type of work. Each of the
five firms have different attributes for this project. One
individual is currently employed as the personnel director for
a private firm. He has performed work as a consultant to both
municipal and private firms in the past and comes highly recomm-
ended. The approach he uses to classification is one which
offers a great degree of flexibility and reliance upon the
program director for the decision making. This is in line with
our requirements.
We would recommend that the city council approve the classif-
ication plan efforts and concur with the retaining of Hugh Hawkins
to act as a trainer to the city staff. The total time commitment
to the project should not exceed 100 hours by the consultant.
P
KN/ ej a
cc: Personnel Director
Respectfully submitted,
ark No lenbercr
_or
City Manager
'?;, ervq?N P1 t:V,uUs?Y
) Z, n coo
?} o o _7_r-k 5 ? -, `'
In .A W N F-'
N.
ft
H G7 L7 ? y Ft F-{ Nh 'C w m n f-'- n n rt 21 - I-h I'd
CD (D '• O n O O O CJ O n n t O O O O C 0
O
* -- N n N?l cn ?j L7, D n?:l C n m m n O 0 ?1) z O ?:5 m n ?-l O Ft
G cc n v O w CD F 2 rt t n rt rt n Fn 2, F n :3 n ?3- n rt C ^J
?D n G Fl Fi n F • Ft r- O n O n Fl In rt P. rh
Cl C) ?D
- n ?a) n r G rt O P. .? n N• n Fi H.
CZ
N o F-
:D F? (? (t n n r+ rr (? o (? (?
rt cn N- O s l r` r * s c cn cn rt n F • co
w rr w P. to ?o Cf) to L s to n ?-, SD, N co rt n Ft rt ' u F-1. rt- to
CD (D o rt O U n U n G n rt *d - I? !D O ?D' , C ID N f., O ? ?j ? cn ?:3- rt O
, ?:5 N. n N ri F • Fi CJ - O S1'C o rt ::? rt 0 ::5 F'- n G C
rt- O C C Ft O Q O m n cn - rt rt 10 v rt P- 1-0 rt Sy N r; Ft R+ n
F F N• FJ F-'• N ?:l P. rt n ;5' G O ti O Fi H. (D C ?D' 'C ri
E, n n n n (t -i rt (t ? Icl N• (D ?-l :j O ?j n o FJ• F rJ
co N w . (D S) (D I n (D H. (D a ro ?7' rt N F-21 (n
O O M Ft m rt x F C O Fl Fr ^y G C CD G O (D rt G (D n F-
4:1 N- P. N Ul O .r-, r7 O J ?j n rh ?l O (D Co P.
O ''d O 1-17 O m klD F (D '-C O rt Fi r P. I-C? rt Ft F h Fi r n
U) n Q) G G ?-j r i n n .; F• U, rr o M (D rt `•C o
P. F-J n cn N mITI Q0 O ?J O m P. .n n O O O n Fi rt I m zn o O
rt P) rt F n UJ r-t M o Sj - :?c r n r- (D rt rt O n Fl
P- Cl) I 1 Fi F'• P. n rt (D M t-) O n I; to p r?' o
O (n F-3 3 C Ft o n: i CD F- ?l rt O Cn ? O Z
C n (D r F
P. H. N F P. ? fJ• (D ?7' '-?l O (D Fl CD (D _
C U)
I-n d cn o 1 F? m (D F- ( Fi zS n
N• (D Fl (D (D O ?j O Ft 1-1< O 7 O rt (D (D n n ?• rt
n n n i n H. Sz ? `C ri F f? ?-h H. m O Fj F P-
?-d ?D' - (D C O N- n S? (D N- O o 1? r? Cn (D o
t (D c t r rt ri (Di t-t `•C n F• LQ F-' U (Di O P. ?
n F Fi W F t3 - CI M (D C (D U7 (D n r- ?J, co rt rt F- n i
F- O CD (D N n n N CD U' (D U) I-'- [n N ? QJ
Sj p z7 Fl 00 n (-co rt n 'o cn O F- CD Ft 1:3
Ul n :1 O F? rt H. O O O O O ?-Q P. m! ? z Q N• ?
Ul (D F co I- ?j H. F ri Fl ? co Fl G rt r U) N ? ? Q1
N ?:5 F,- O to F cn b' N O rt CD F
t rt 0C rt- U) m CD rh ni F? rt G Ffi F N.
N O F'- F' H. H. I a-), O Fh n FJ O C n O t? (D C Fl
n o rt r-h (D " O rt O co F • ?t rt (D rt CD
?, N N Fl n ?j rt Fi . rt n
Ft cn o n ?-j ' C rt (D to O o rt
F''•
O 1 21 ? - S 11 H.
cn rt (D n O O
O rt O
y
Fi
N-
(D
Fl
y
H
n
x
ra
z
y
c? v? ? w tv
'-S ? w CJ N• n ? n n
CD C O C "U n O n
^i n n ?l (D N m ? lc?
rt N (D CD rt U
U cn N- O In O ? ? N• n
rt C M' n Ft O n
(`J C? `'C U1 U1 !P ?:5 M :? Ul
N r t ft
C n n SJ cn ?i O G
Ft C C n n F
."' (t t7 n O to
n H• } U F n rt
n C co O r- 0
cn ?} CD "O ?-l CD Cl n
cn C C, n CD n C
rt to E? O 5 G " CD
(D F ?S (D ?:5 (D C rt n ;,
C7 0 `, 7 P. n rt
• c'1 rt ?. rt rt O O
U? cn U O (n H. ? ? rt
OF n O rn F
n LQ O cn rt
n O ?
rt (D (D Q
F- t" i Ft ?j rt rt nl
O Sj ?j ?Y H- n
?c O C) F? Q O
(D C, (DO ::? rD
C)P-0 n tom
cn F n (D O
?-Q O Fi (D
H- O
rt CD n n
I- n (D C H.
F-' (D n Sj n
• Sj
1 n
N.
N
0
F--' N
t- O Q0 0 v
o 7 rt F O rt cn h " S t7 rt ? CZ rt b
S n ri D N O Fi O C 1-. n (D CD t-i
F O i-i O 0 rt rt H Q Q z C C C O N C C (D
C ?-h <1 P. () O n CD F (D r F (D F? ? ? (D ? co
N FJ• O P. "i Z:5 `i Ft ?l ? rt ? G ? 1 (D
C n C, (D QQ n RJ (D ?j ?j co C7 rt o " i?
(D N- " P. F? " ri r CD rt C FJ "j O (t
U) to F U) r-S ij fjl C N n (D
n o ri
to
r1 QQ O Sj n N N N (D rr ?j (D
U
`i ?Q rt cn rt G w O n ri n
w N• rt cn Cn ?.n (D Al O rt s (D C
C) C U (? (D ?j rt n N (D CD L-Q O n U C U
rt FJ F? L-C 7' ?l H ; Fi ?-:j u. (D ?j n G O H.
I
n P) (D U) (D Ft C C n O N H. n ?
n n rt C O F N Z? n C r-h rt - ?)
(D P. SJ `,I N• U n n Ft P- n rt rt
rt co r-fi ":'7 n n t (D C H
O O rt rt P- rt ,7 co cn sr n ca CD C
r-h H. n O rl ? rt rt rt ?j C, (D
D n F-- n O b TJ Cn n s, O n
rt SJ ?j s r0 G ?j b?j rt n
F p' H. ?J S n F -0 v D Ft O b i
O ?j O 1-, H. Ft F ? Cd P. U
?-Q r ?j S? I I ti O (n UQ n n rt
C(D O rt i t y t? C ?3' n V,i O (D
D n C n ?. ?. P. ? (D ? n?) C n
(D 7: N• U. r` rt U n F rt N
F i U^ ?i CD O O CD rt F F ?
O rt ?j n n G n S'lj rt '•G
n ti t O ri ' o u r h O
n n C I I I I ?-i O O U^ O
n U; 121 rt O v n w D
C (-t- >?>7 rrH- Un U. n G
C n rt N• S': O 17J 7J 1-0 CJ ? ? n w• rt O ,t
O (-h k-? Fi Fi n CD F tY O C) SJ
H- P- P- (D LQ
SJ rt IJ FJ F r ti t (D
G Q r O h O n ti 23 D
l< U wco w (D ?O C n (D
co U? C) 0c:) n Fin fi O ?:l
• N n O n C rt
(n I F-' ? cn r? n
rt v'- F Q
u• ?
O n
? tt
C O
Q n
U?
n rn
ri
H.
('t F
N•
O n
n
C n
n C
O
o
(D n
n r
rt
O
n
N•
r- t
n
w
N•
rt
[v
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 336
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor• I c? ??M L+?t ,? 57 V"J
and - --,.? _ ...,..__....__.
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield Council Members:
r
Subject: Review of Tentative 1980 Municipal Golf
Course Budget
There is an item on the October 22, 1979 city council
agenda providing for council review of a tentative 1980 budget
for the municipal golf course. Although council members received
various golf course budgets throughout the life of the project,
all of the budgeting being done for 1980 operation of the golf
course is still quite tentative, and subject to change as the
project moves toward completion of construction. However, many
of the budgetary items for 1980 require implementation soon,
including recruitment of a golf course manager, who is scheduled
to be appointed in early 1980. Recuritment of this position now
is timely becasue most people currently working as managers or
assistant managers will be finishing their season soon, and many
of them head south for winter golf weather. We need to make
contact with possible candidates while they are still in our
geographic area.
A copy of the proposed 1980 golf course budget is attached.
This budget is funded entirely through the golf course capital
project, and does not represent additional 1980 expenditures be-
yond those costs already included in the project. However, the
budget does represent an attempt of the staff to identify the
1980 golf course costs which will be related primarily to 1980
operation of the facility. Although it is likely that this bud-
get might be modified during the course of the year, I thought
council members should review and adopt the proposed 1980 budget
at this time, so that the staff may continue to work toward
implementation of this budget in anticipation of the course open-
ing in the late summer of 1980.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Community Services Director
Finance Coordinator
i
•
TOTAL EXPENDITURES BY CHARACTER AND MAJOR OBJECT CLASSIFICATIONS
FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION ACCOUNT NUMBER
Community Services Golf Course
1979 BUDGET
1980 PROPOSED
CLASSIFICATIONS 1978
ACTUAL ADJUSTED PROPOSED BUDGET
REVISION
Current Expenses 1 15 , 279
Personal Services 66 , 738
Other Services and Charges 64 , 960
Supplies 246,977
Total Current Expenses
s
Capital Outlays
Depreciation 0
21,049
Total Expenditures 268,026
Revenues COMMENTARY 209,847
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ANNUAL BUDGET
FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION ACCOUNT NUMBER
Community Services Golf Course
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES
BY POSITION OR MINOR OBJECT CLASSIFICATION
NUMBER OF 1979 BUDGET 1980 BUDGET
CLASSIFICATIONS EMPLOYEES SALARY PROPOSED
1979 1980 GRADE ADJUSTED REVISION PROPOSED ADOPTED
Adjusted Proposed
REGULAR EMPLOYEES
Manager
Greens Superintenden 1
Mechanic
sl
PART-TIME EMPLOYEES
Clerical
SEASONAL EMPLOYEES
Ranger
Starter
Cashier
Food Preparation
Instructor
Driving Range
Summer Laborer
Custodian
CITY OF RICHFIELD. MINNESOTA
1 G-17
1 G-15
1 LT-4
3
20.321
17,
FUND DEPARTMENT DIVISION ACCOUNT NUMBER
Community Services Golf Course
TOTAL EXPENDITURES BY M61N0R 00jEC1 CLASSIFICATION
78 1979 BUDGET
1980 PROPOSED
CLASSIFICATIONS 19 -
ACTUAL
ADJUSTED PROPOSED
REVISION BUDGET
PERSONAL SERVICES
1010 Regular Employees 50,277
1020 Part-time Employees 4,669
1050 Interdepartmental Labor 974
1080 Seasonal Employees 50,491
1091 Retirement Contributions 3,023
1092 FICA Contributions 3,368
1093 Hospitalization 2,437
1094 Term Life Insurance 40
115,279
OTHER SERVICES AND CHARGES
1100 Rents and Leases 16,400
1110 Advertising & Publications 1,000
1120 Maintenance & Repairs 4,150
1130 Professional Services 100
1200 Communications 2,700
1210 Travel-Conferences-Schools 732
1220 Subscriptions & Memberships 261
1230 Utility Services 9,260
1260 Insurance & Bonds 27,750
1265 Workers' Compensation 2,025
1290 Other Contractual Services 2,360
66,738
SUPPLIES
1300 Office Supplies 660
1310 Automotive Supplies 9,900
1320 Clothing.. 270
1360 General Supplies 28.200
1389 Equipment for Resale 2,050
1390 Purchase for Resale 23,880
64,960
DEPRECIATION
1899 Depreciation 21,049
TOTAL ACCOUNT
1 268,026
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ANNUAL BUDGET
REVENUES
0
Greens Fees
Regulation 18
6,500 rounds @ $7.50
6,500 rounds @ $6.75
Par 3
4,500 rounds @ $4.50
4.500 rounds @ $4.00
Driving Range
6,000 @ $2.00
Cart Rental
8 carts/day x $9.00 x 12t days
Pro Shop
Club Rental
Food Service
Beer
Pop
Coffee
Rolls
Hamburgers, Hot Dogs, Sandwiches
Vending Machines
Advertising
Locker Rental
48,750
,43,875
20,250
18,000
10,000
3,500
3,000
1,250
25,000
92,625
38,250
Instruction
5 people/class x 3 hrs./week x 4 weeks x $6 x 25 classes
less cancelled classes
Telephone Commission
TOTAL REVENUES
130,875
12,000
9,072
1,500
1 ,000
42,750
3,000
1,500
100
8,000
50
209.847
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MI1,=SOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 335
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Discussion of Construction of Tot Lot at
Christian Park
The Christian Park redevelopment project underwent an ex-
tensive park planning process typically used in the City of
Richfield in 1978. During the project, the neighborhood, park
and recreation advisory commission and the city council partici-
pated in meetings related to the preliminary and final design of
the park. Each group reviewed and approved the plans and specifi-
cations.
As can happen after completion of a project, there is now
some discussion that the play apparatus provided with the new
park design is not suitable for very young, small children. The
purpose of this letter is to indicate to the city council that,
although the project is not yet complete, there are sufficient
funds remaining in the project to provide additional play appar-
atus for the tiny tots if the council desires to proceed with the
design, selection and installation of such equipment.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Community Services Director
i
CITY OF RICHFIELD, 'MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 334
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Lyndale Garden Center Planned Unit Development
As you know, Mr. Burt Rutman is currently involved in devel-
oping plans for major building and site improvements at the Lyn-
dale Garden Center. City council action was originally scheduled
for the October 22, 1979 city council meeting, but has been post-
poned until November 13, 1979 because of several issues which are
being resolved.
Notices have been sent to surrounding property owners inform-
ing them that the council will consider this matter on October 22,
1979. The city staff has asked that the developer make a pre-
sentation at the October 22 meeting to bring the council up-to-date
about the project and allow the surrounding property owners an
opportunity to identify any additional issues which should be
addressed prior to city council action.
We would recommend that the city council take no action on
this matter other than to receive input presented by the develop-
er and surrounding property owners, until the November 13, 1979
city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
J
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Planning Director
0
I
i 1
1 l yy
`? IF, ?
?a1 S
s
Ago,
I _,i;;
1 Si ?i 1
.P,
i
._i-J f w - e I ?a A o? n al
I ! r _.
------------
I- -77FTTIT-TT-FF
i \\
V,
?y
CL:
w
g
o w
z? >
a o
00
w J F-
?w
Q
m Q CIO
J ?
O O
E. T-I
I
I-
?_ I !' 3' •'? I I I
? l
CN
i
? cc
?l
? y
14,
I
w-?
cr.
T • -'? ?,, z? ? ? •\ \\ ? ? ??\ `? it ?/ \ I
04
?i
ti
M \
S
s i
• r
I •
•
r c !r ?:
1! ? R i
V! j r ? ? ? ,I 3 {
?7 U
zA^ D1 !:.
k , ....-t . v I K 1
-- Ir `-iJ ryry ? , Ll F?
,-.?- I I .?I I -T- p II
( ???i11Fii.tTIiIIIIi°.ifl!iI:
W {{_ p,
•^ ? i ?J ? ?r-- ?y-? r a- ?-T''-LLL >C? 1?'??115 `LL 1'7
r?
v
N
ter.
L~ /IP
2
14 C,4
x
N
? U 1
CL 0
l
u.
i,.z,? L5?
•
1
f a.-
? 5
9 ca
1
I? y ? ? hr.i i' q I ((?
;
\
3
i
\\\
?
1 1
I
I
1•
H
r It
I ?
?i
i'
r
??t
?r
' ?rrt ? I ? i j ? ? z :a
?? ! rZ:? I I I i 4 ?
z
ii
a?
•
0
0
K
I?
fry-
K
x
1
r >
y{ , ?
7._•d `?_ Il?
Z
r?
i
I;
I
t
t
Z
0
ao
I
9`
7
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 333
Agenda October 22, 1979
0
The Honorable Mayar
and
Members of the City
City of Richf ield
Council Members:
1
Subj ect :
Counc it
Authorization to Execute Agreement with
Ahlquist Family, Lyndale Avenue Improve-
ment Project
On October 9, 1979, the city council established just compen-
sation for a permanent easement across property owned by members
of the Ahlquist family in the northeast corner of 55th Street
and Lyndale Avenue. This easement is necessary for completion
of the Lyndale Avenue pedestrian system, to be constructed in
1950. The value of the easement is $10,000. It incorporates
the existing sidewalk abutting the Ahlquist's buildings into the
public walk system. Customer parking, which utilizes both public
right-of-way adjacent to Lyndale Avenue and private property
would be permitted to continue, thus protecting the viability of
this commercial frontage.
The attached agreement for acquisition of this easement
commits the owners and the city to fulfill certain obligations:
The Owners
will donate the permanent easement to the city;
will modify signing on the north building to conform
with the L/H/N design guidelines
The City
will provide those improvements which are part of the
Lyndale project, such as sidewalks and landscaping
materials
- will pay an amount not to exceed $1,500 to she owners
for sealcoating and graveling and/or overlaying the
parking area between the buildings and Lyndale Avenue,
and the buildings and 65th Street
will pay for the installation of a physical barrier
at the rear of this commercial property to minimize
the conflict of the cor,Lmercial land use with adjoin-
ing residential property, if the alley is vacated by
the city.
v
J
C??
There are three exhibits with the agreement. Exhibit A
is a copy of the letter of donation, one for each parcel. Ex-
hibit B is the temporary construction easements, again, one for
each parcel. Exhibit C is the plan sheets for the property. They
are not attached because of their size. They are substantially
the same as approved by the council on March 26, 1979.
It is recor:u^zended that the city council authorize the mayor
and city manager to execute the attached agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
s
cc: Acting Redevelopment Director
Acting Planning Director
Acting City Engineer
•
0
•
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of
1979, by and between Gunnar M. Ahlquist, Hazel F. Ahlquist,
and Mark Ahlquist hereinafter "owners" and the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter, "City".
WITNESSETH,
WHEREAS, the owners of Lot 2, Block 2, "J.N. Hauser's
Addition" and Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 6 Lyndale Oaks; and,
WHEREAS, the owners have by instrument, a copy of which
is attached herewith and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, donated
to the City a perpetual easement for landscaping and sidewalk purposes
over, under, across and through a part of said lots as more fully
described in Exhibit A;
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to reach certain agree-
ments concerning such easements, concerning the maintenance of the
easement areas, concerning parking in certain areas described in
Exhibit A and adjacent land, and concerning alteration to the
premises currently located on the property described in Exhibit A
together with an agreement for the allocation of costs occasioned
by the various activities contemplated by this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed, stipulated and covenanted
by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. The owners and lien holders of and to the property
described in Exhibit A shall, within a reasonable time after the date
hereof, execute and deliver to the City, an easement in recordable
form evidencing the conveyance made in Exhibit A.
2. The undersigned owners and lienholders of and to
the property described in Exhibit A shall execute and deliver to
the City a temporary construction easement in substantially the
form contained in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof as if fully set out at this point. Such temporary construc-
tion easement shall be delivered to the City no later than November 1,
1979.
• 3. As consideration for such easement and for the
covenants hereafter made by the City, the parties mutually agree
to the following:
A. Owners obligations
(a) The owners of Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 6,
Lyndale Oaks, shall alter and modify all signs of
such lots to conform with the City's L/H/N urban
design guidelines as adopted October 15, 1975.
All alterations and modifications shall be completed
on or before October 31, 1980, and the plans for
such alterations and modifications shall be subject
to prior approval by the Richfield Director of
Planning and Redevelopment.
(b) The owners shall permit the City to close all
curb cuts from Lyndale onto the subject property
located between the corner of Lyndale Avenue and
65th Street and a point 260 feet Northwesterly
• therefrom as measured along the Southwesterly lines
of Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks.
(c) The owners shall stripe the parking spaces located
on the property.
(d) The owners shall provide storm water drainage
from their property to the City storm water system
in 65th Street, or accept City storm water grates or
to pay the difference between the underground system
and the storm water grates.
(e) To maintain and make repairs, except major
repairs on the sidewalk areas within the permanent
easement areas. Such obligation shall include snow
removal, sweeping, removal of obstructions and
hazards and minor repairs. The owners agree to
hold the City harmless, indemnify, defend, and pay
the cost of same from any claim or cause of action
for injury or damage arising or growing out of the
failure of the owners to discharge their obligation
contained in this paragraph.
-2-
•
•
•
(f) To maintain all landscaping to be located on
the easement area including watering, trimming and
fertilizing same.
(g) To maintain the parking lot described in Exhibit C
including that portion outside of the easement area
and to maintain and replace as necessary, the bituminous
and barrier curbs located at the front end of all
parking stalls and to hold harmless, indemnify, defend
and pay the cost of same from any claim or cause of
action for injury or damage arising or growing out of
such owners' failure to fully discharge its obligations
under this paragraph. Exhibit C is plan detail sheets
13 and 14, Lyndale Avenue.
B. City's Obligations
(a) The City shall construct a 40 foot wide curb cut
as described on Exhibit C.
(b) The City shall construct a sidewalk as described
on Exhibit C.
(c) The City shall provide landscaping and barrier curb
as shown on Exhibit C.
(d) The City shall provide space adequate for the
parking of twelve motor vehicles along the Lyndale Avenue
frontage based on Exhibit C, sheet 13.
(e) The city will pay an amount not to exceed $1,500
t?
y to the owners upon presentation of invoices for the
seal coating and graveling, and/or overlayment of the
parking area indentified in Exhibit C.
(f) The City shall replace any dead landscaping and
perform all major repair work to the sidewalk. The
City shall save harmless, indemnify, defend and pay
the cost of same from any claim or cause of action for
damage or injury arising out of or caused by the failure
of the City to fully discharge its obligation contained
in this paragraph.
-3-
. (g) To provide storm sewer grates should the
owners elect for their installation pursuant to
paragraph A. d. above.
(h) At such time as the public alley abutting
this property is vacated, the City and/or the HRA
will pay for the installation of a physical barrier
in accordnace with the redevelopment project
objectives to minimize the conflict between this
commercial property and the adjoining residential
property.
4. The provisions of this agreement shall bind the
parties hereto and their successors, and assigns.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their
hands the date and year first above written.
CITY OF RICHFIELD,
A MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
. By
Loren L. Law
Its Mayor
By
Its Citv Man
Owners
By
Gunnar M. Ah quist
By
Hazel F. A lquist
By
Mark Ahlquist
0
-4-
i To Whom It May Concern:
The undersigned have received from the City of Richfield an
offer to purchase a perpetual easement area for sidewalk and
landscaping purposes over, under, across and through that part
of Lot 2, Block 2, "J.N. Hauser's Addition" according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota described
as follows:
That part of said Lot 2, lying northerly and north-
easterly of line "X" and southerly and southwesterly
of line "Y"
Line "X" is described as commencing at the southeast
corner of said Lot 2; thence on a bearing of West,
assumed basis for bearings, along the south line
of said Lot 2, 101.56 feet to the point of beginning
of the line to be described; thence North 00 degrees
05 minutes 50 seconds West, 19.44 feet; thence South
89 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds West, 68.03 feet to
a point hereinafter referred to as point "A"; thence
North 43 degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds West, 35.30
feet; thence North 46 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds
East, 1.00 feet; thence North 43 degrees 21 minutes
32 seconds West, 115.00 feet and there terminating.
Line "Y" is described as commencing at the southeast
corner of said'Lot 2; thence on a bearing of West,
assumed basis for bearings, along the south line
of said Lot 2, 93.56 feet to the point of beginning
of the line to be described; thence North 00 degrees
05 minutes 50 seconds West, 24.45 feet; thence South
89 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds West, 72.15 feet;
• thence North 56 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds West,
11.00 feet; thence North 26 degrees 22 minutes 24
seconds West, 26.23 feet; thence North 69 degrees
28 minutes 59 seconds West, 10.09 feet; thence North
43 degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds West, 100.00 feet
and there terminating.
also that part of said Lot 2 described as beginning
at said point "A"; thence North 43 degrees 21 minutes
32 seconds West 11.30 feet; thence South 59 degrees
54 minutes 10 seconds West, 20.00 feet; thence North
43 degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds West, 29.00 feet;
thence South 16 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West
to the northeasterly right-of-way line of Lyndale
Avenue; thence southeasterly along said right-of-way
line to its intersection with a line that bears South
59 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds West from said Point A,
thence return to beginning.
The description of the easement and the offering price was
contained in the offering letter mentioned above.
It is understood that the offering price represents the reduction
in the value of the entire parcel and was determined by subtracting
the fair market value of the entire parcel after the easement
taking from the present fair market value of the entire parcel.
The undersigned were offered an opportunity to accompany
the appraiser on his inspection of the property, and were
informed that we could hire our own appraiser to determine
the easement value and be reimbursed an amount not to exceed
Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00).
0
0
0
Finally, following review and consideration of the offering
letter, we hereby do donate the above described easement to
the City of Richfield.
Dated:
By
By
Gunnar M. Ahlquist
By
Hazel F. Ahlquist
Mark Ahlquist
To Whom It May Concern:
The undersigned have received from the City of Richfield an offer
to purchase a perpetual easement area for sidewalk and landscaping
purposes over, under, across and through that part of Lots 18, 19,
and 20, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
That part of said Lots 18, 19, and 20 lying southwesterly
of line "X" and northeasterly of line "Y"
Line "X" is described as commencing at the southeast corner
of said Lot 20; thence on a bearing of West, assumed basis
for bearings, 102.75 feet along the south line of said Lot 20
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence
North 43 degrees 32 minutes 29 seconds west, 27.99 feet;
thence North 43 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds, west, 115.01
feet; thence south 46 degrees 50 minutes 40 seconds west
5.75 feet; thence north 80 degrees 56 minutes 29 seconds
west to the northeasterly right-of-way line of Lyndale
Avenue and there terminating.
Line "Y" described as commencing at the southeast corner
of said Lot 20, thence on a bearing of West, assumed basis
for bearings, 112.60 feet along the south line of said
Lot 20 to the point of beginning of the line to be described;
thence north 43 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds west, 128.08
feet; thence north 80 degrees 56 minutes 29 seconds west;
to the northeasterly right-of-way line of Lyndale Avenue,
and there terminating.
The description of the easement and the offering price was contained
in the offering letter metioned above.
It is understood that the offering price represents the reduction in
the value of the entire parcel and was determined by subtracting
the fair market value of the entire parcel after the easement
taking from the present fair market value of the entire parcel.
The undersigned, were offered an opportunity to accompany the
appraiser on his inspection of the property, and was informed that
we could hire our own appraiser to determine the easement value
and be reimbursed an amount not to exceed Three Hundred Dollars
($300.00).
Finally, following review and consideration of the offering letter,
we hereby do donate the above described easement to the City of
Richfield.
Dated:
By
Gunnar M. Ahlquist
By
Hazel F. Ahlquist
By
Mark Ahlquist
is
i
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of
, 1979, by and between Gunnar M. Ahlquist,
Hazel F. Ahlquist, and Mark Ahlquist, parties of the first part
and the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corpora-
tion, party of the second part.
WITNESSETH: That the parties of the first part in considera-
tion of the sum of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERA-
TION to them in hand paid by said party of the second part, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant and convey
unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns
the hereinafter described temporary construction easement.
Description of Parcel:
Lot 2, Block 2, J.N. Hauser's Second Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Description of Easement:
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, across
and through that part of said Lot 2 lying southerly, southwesterly,
and westerly of the following described line:
- •- Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence
on a bearing of West, assumed basis for bearings along the
south line of said Lot 2, 78.56 feet to the point of
• beginning,of the line to be described; thence North 00
degrees 05 minutes 50 seconds West, 24.48 feet; thence South
89 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds West, 87.15 feet; thence north
56 degrees 51 minutes 25 seconds West, 11.00 feet; thence
North 26 degrees 22 minutes 24 seconds West, 26.23 feet; thence
North 69 degrees 28 minutes 59 seconds West, 10.09 feet; thence
North 43 degrees 21 minutes 32 seconds West, 77.05 feet; thence
North 46 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East to the northerly
line of said lot 2 and there terminating.
Such temporary construction easement commencing on June 1,
1980, and terminating on November 1, 1980.
The party of the second part agrees to restore the temporary
easement area to its previous condition as permitted by the
improvements installed on the adjoining permanent easement area.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have
set their hands the day and year first above written.
By
Gunnar M. Ahlquist
By
Hazel F. Ahlquist
By
Mark Ahlquist
This Instrument Drafted By:
LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz
1100 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of
1979, by and between Gunnar M. Ahlquist,
Hazel F. Ahlquist, and Mark Ahlquist, parties of the first part
and the City of Richfield, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corp-
oration, party of the second part.
WITNESSETH: That the parties of the first part in considera-
tion of the sum of ONE DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERA-
TION to them in hand paid by said party of the second part, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant and
convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and
assigns the hereinafter described temporary construction easement.
Description of Parcel:
Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 6 Lyndale Oaks, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Description of Easement:
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, across
and through that part of Lots 18, 19, and 20 lying southwesterly
of the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 20; thence
on a bearing of west, assumed basis for bearings, 88.95
feet along the south line of Lot 20 to the point of beginning
of the line to be described; thence North 43 degrees 32 minutes
• 29 seconds West, 27.99 feet; thence on a bearing of West,
13.80 feet; thence North 43 degrees 09 minutes 20 seconds
West to the northwesterly line of said Lot 18 and there term-
inating.
Such temporary construction easement commencing on June 1, 1980,
and terminating on November 1, 1980.
The party of the second part agrees to restore the temporary
easement area to its previous condition as permitted by the improve-
ments installed on the adjoining permanent easement area.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have
set their hands the day and year first above written.
By
Gunnar M. Ahlquist
By
Hazel F. Ahlquist
By
Mark Ahlquist
0
This Instrument Drafted By:
LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz
1100 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 332
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and 11
Members of the City Council
City of Richf ield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Relating to Joint Airport
Zoning Board
•
The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has requested
the City of Richfield's participation in the creation of a joint
airport zoning board. This request has been made in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes 1978, Sections 360.061-360.074, which
provides that MAC may request that municipalities in which "airport
hazards" exist to form a joint zoning board. If a municipality
chooses not to participate on the board, MAC may zone the airport
hazard areas without the municipality's involvement, even though
the land affected may lie within that municipality. The most
stringent existing zoning regulations will be the controlling
regulations.
The joint airport zoning board will have the authority to
adopt zoning regulations to control such things as building
heights, land use, issuance of special use permits and variances,
and non-conforming uses. The statutes dealing with existing uses
are quite liberal and are intended to avoid disruption of exist-
ing neighborhoods. Because of this, the impact on Richfield should
be minimal.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing participation in the joint airport zoning
board. The council should also appoint two persons to serve on the
board. We would recommend that one appointee be a council person
or planning coim:ission member, and the other appointee be a city
staff person.
L(hrhk>- 1? c, LdMrv? CI?n?K^tiwn!
Respectfully submitted,
i
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Planning Director
.! RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN
JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARD
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (hereinafter
"the "MAC") owns and controls the Minneapolis-St. Paul International
Airport-Wold Chamberlain Field, a public airport located in
Hennepin County; and
WHEREAS, certain land appertaining to such airport is located
within the territorial limits of this City; and
WHEREAS, the MAC has requested in writing that this City join
with it and other affected municipalities and township in the
creation of a Joint Airport Zoning Board; and
WHEREAS, this City deems it necessary and expedient to
participate in such a Joint Airport Zoning Board in cooperation with
the MAC pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 360.063, Subd. 3, and
other applicable laws, for the purpose of establishing, administering,
and enforcing zoning laws for the area surrounding the airport and
for the protection of the airport and the public; and
• WHEREAS, the above statute provides that this City has the
right to appoint two persons to said Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the undersigned City of
Richfield as follows:
1. That there be created in cooperation with the
Metropolitan Airports Commission and other affected
municipalities, a Joint Airport Zoning Board composed of
representatives of the undersigned City and representatives
of the other affected municipalities and townships, as is
designated by Minnesota Statutes Section 360.063, Subd. 3.
2. The undersigned City hereby appoints
and to be their representatives on
said Board, said persons to serve for an indefinite term
until they resign or are replaced by the City Council.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd
day of October, 1979.
ATTEST:
Loren L. Law, Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
v
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 331
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contract,
Jerry's Standard Station, 6600 Lyndale Ave.
At the September 24, 1979 city council meeting, the city
council authorized advertising for bids for the demolition of
Jerry's Standard Station, 5600 Lyndale Avenue. Demolition of
this site is necessary to the L/H/N improvement project-Lyndale
Avenue construction, scheduled to be completed in 1980.
The bids for this work were received and opened on October
13. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulation are attached.
• Three bids were received from (1) Bachman Construction of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the amount of $26,841; (2) Minnesota
Lumber and Wrecking Company, St. Paul, in the amount of $12,000;
and (3) Carl Bolander and Sons, Co., Minneapolis, in the amount
of $9,950.
It is the recommendation of the Acting Public Works Director,
in which I concur, that the City Council award the bid for
demolition of Jerry's Standard Station to Carl Bolander & Sons,
Co., at their low bid price of $9,950.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Finance Coordinator
Acting Public Works Director
Acting Redevelopment Director
r
t
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Bid Opening
October 18, 1979
Demolition and Site Clearance
6600 Lyndale Avenue
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the administrative
staff was called by Karl Nollenberger, City Manager, who announced that the
purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for
Demolition and Site Clearance at 6600 Lyndale Avenue, as advertised in the
official newspaper on October 3, and 10, 1979.
Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager
Bruce Palmborg, Housing & Redevelopment Director
Rick Jopke, Acting Planning Director
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
•
The following bids were received and read aloud:
GROSS AMOUNT CREDIT FOR
BIDDER DEMOLITION SALVAGE TOTAL BID
Minnesota Lumber & Wrecking $13,000 $1,000 $12,000
Bachman's Construction
$27,441 $ 600 $26,841
Carl Bolander & Sons Co.
$10,250 $ 300 $ 9,950
The City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at
the October 22, 1979 city council meeting.
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
Al
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
i
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City' Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 329
Agenda October 22, 1979
Subject: Issues and Concerns Identified in Comprehensive
Planning Process
There is an item on the October 22, 1979 city council agenda
providing for council review and discussion of issues and concerns
which have been identified through the comprehensive planning
process. These issues and concerns were compiled from comments
received at neighborhood meetings, previous discussions with the
city council and other public officials and civic leaders, and
from the staff's research in preparing the various inventories
on public utilities, transportation, etc. related to the compre-
hensive plan. The issues and concerns are particularly important
because they will be used in formulating the goals and policies
which will form the framework of the overall comprehensive plan.
The list of issues and concerns has been presented to the
council for your review and determination if they are relevant to
planning Richfield's future.. The council should also suggest any
additional issues and concerns which they have, not included in
this list, which should be addressed in drafting goals and policies
to be included in the comprehensive plan. After discussion of
these items, it is recommended that the city council adopt the
list of issues and concerns, and authorize the staff to use those
issues and concerns in continuing the comprehensive plan process.
Respectfully submitted,
.? i
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Planning Director
0
00-
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 323
Agenda October 22, 1979
C e_« l Z L-fq--t-l
Subject.: Amendment to Gambling Ordinance, Relatina
to Bingo Compensation, First Reading.
0
During the city council's recent review and consideration
of a proposed gambling ordinance, representatives of the VFW
requested of the staff that the city also consider amending
the Richfield bingo ordinance to reflect an amendment to Minn-
esota Statutes 349.17, subdivision 1. That amendment increased
the maximum compensation for certain persons conducting bingo
from $12.00 to $20.00. The $12.00 maximum compensation for such
persons which is contained in the Richfield City Code complied
with previous state statutes.
Attached to this council letter is a proposed. arn2ndment
which would increase the compensation which may be paid.to a
person conducting bingo to $20.00. The amendment would provide
that this increased rate of compensation would be effective on
August 1, 1979, which was also the effective date of the statute.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
0
KN/eja
cc: Acting City Clerk
Public Safety Director
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER V,
PART 11, SECTION 5.19 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter V, Part II, Section 5.19 of the Ordinance Code of the
City of Richfield dealing with the licensing and regulation of
certain types of amusement and recreation is hereby amended by
amending subdivision 9, paragraph (2) thereof to read as follows:
If (2) No compensation shall be paid to any person
in connection with bingo or gambling activities except
[that] in the case of bingo, an active member of the
organizations, or its auxiliary, or the spouse or
surviving spouse of an active member, conducting the
bingo occasion. In the case of bingo only, a person
not an active member of the auxiliary, or the spouse
or surviving spouse of an active member, may participate
in the conduct of the bingo occasion by resolution of
a majority of the membership recorded in the approved
minutes of the organization. Non-management assistants
who are not active members of the organization, or the
spouse or surviving spouse of an active member, may
be hired to assist members in conducting the bingo
occasion. Beginning August 1, 1979, compensation shall
not exceed [$12.00] $20.00 per bingo occasion.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this day of , 1979.
Loren L. Law, Mayor
ATTEST
City Clerk
•
w?
0
•
BINGO-COMPENSATION FOR CONDUCTING
CHAPTER 166
?_ . H.F.No 976. ?•
An Act relating to bingo, raising the compensation allowed persons conduct-
Ing a bingo occasion; amending Minnesota Statutes 1978, Section 349.17,
Subdivision I..'
rBe it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Minnesota:
Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1978, Section 349.17, Subdivision 1 is
amended to read: , . ;....
349.17 ' Conduct of bingo 11 Subdivision 1. No compensation shall be paid to any person in connection
with a bingo occasion except an active member of the organization, or its
auxiliary, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member, conducting
the bingo occasion nor shall any person not an active member of the organi-
zation or its auxiliary or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member
participate in the conduct of a bingo occasion, except by resolution of a ma-
jority of the membership, recorded in the official minutes of the organization, ;
r,_j ,. ??e ?„r assistants who are ot active members of the organization,
n
or its auxiliary, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member, may
be hired to assist members in conducting a -bingo occasion. Compensation
shall not exceed $20 for a bingo occasion,
Approved May 22, 1979. <
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
0
Council Letter No. 327
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Plembers:
Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000, Paper for
Winter Brochure
S
Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that
the city council must approve purchases of merchandise, materials,
equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1,000.
y
Four times each year, the City of Richfield distributes to
each Richfield residence a brochure which includes the city News-
letter and information on park and recreation program offerings.
There is an item on the October 22, 1979 city council agenda provid-
ing for the purchase of paper for the printing of the Winter brochure.
It is recommended that the city council approve the purchase
of paper from Wilcox Paper Company in the amount of $2,155.36.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
0
d
06
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 325
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City'?'_ouncil
City of Richf ield
Council Members:
Subjegt: Release of Bond for Off-Street Parking
5421-27 Penn Avenue
On May 29, 1979, the city council authorized execution of
an off-street parking contract with Mr. Donald J. VonBarcaen to
construct a new parking lot and remodel his existing commercial
building located at 6421-27 Penn Avenue.
An inspection of the site by the city staff indicates that
that the owner has complied with all terms of the off-street park-
ing agreement. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council
adopt the attached resolution, authorizing release of the per-
formance bond for this off-street parking contract.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Acting Public Works Director
Community Services Director
n
LJ
a
I
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND
ON OFF-STREET PARKING
Mr. Donald Von Bargen
6427 Penn Avenue South
Location: 6421-27 Penn Avenue South
Use: Existing Commercial Building
WHEREAS, Donald Von Bargen, 6427 Penn Avenue South, had an
off-street parking agreement with the City of Richfield relating
to 6421-27 Penn Avenue South, which contract bears the designation
of Contract No. 2304, and which contract was guaranteed by
a personal check in the amount of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000), and
WHEREAS, said Donald Von Bargen has substantially complied with
the provisions of said agreement and now seeks to be relieved of
any further obligation under said bond, and
WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring
said Donald Von Bargen to continue to provide a bond for security
on the performance of said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
That the city manager is hereby authorized and directed to
release Donald Von Bargen for any and all acts committed or incurred
in violation of said Contract No. 2304, on and after the 22nd day
of October, 1979.
Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this 22nd
day of October, 1979.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
0
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
S
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 325
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Execution of Stipulation Agreement with
Lyndale Garden Center
0
On June 11, 1979, the city council authorized initiation of
eminent domain proceedings to acquire most of the easement par-
cels along Lyndale Avenue which are necessary to complete the
sidewalk and associated improvements scheduled to be constructed
along Lyndale Avenue during 1980. The easement parcels adjacent
to the Lyndale Garden Center were included within the eminent
domain resolution.
To relocate the fence, lights and signs on this property, it
was necessary to obtain permission of all parties having,an owner-
ship interest in the property. Rather than seeking signatures on
a temporary easement, legal counsel incorporated a statement giving
us the right to enter the property into a "Stipulation Relating to
the Taking of Title and Possession". By signing this agreement,
all parties agreed to permit us to enter the property, and also
agreed to not legally challenge the city's taking of the easement
area. However, before this document may be filed with the court,
it is necessary that it be executed by the Mayor and City Manager.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached
resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the
attached stipulation agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl \7ollenberger
City Manager
cc: Acting Public Works Director
Community Services Director
Acting Plannina Director
Acting Redevelopment Director
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF STIPULATION
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed
a stipulation involving certain properties located within
the Lyndale Avenue public improvement area, a copy of such
stipulation being attached herewith and made a part hereof;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation
of staff that the stipulation be executed on behalf of the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Manager
• are authorized to execute such stipulation for and on behalf
of the City of Richfield.
Loren L. Law Mayor
ATTEST:
City Cler
9
• STATE OF MINNESOTA
COU14TY OF HENNEPIN
City of Richfield, a Minnesota
Municipal corporation,
Petitioner,
VS.
Helen Bard, Ernest Goldblatt,
Sara Jean Rotstein,
Roslyn Tarshish, Sam I. Pichey,
Delores Pichey, Irving Pichey, aka
Yisroel Chaim Pichey,
Donya Pichey, Lyndale Hardware, a
Minnesota corporation, Tower
Mortgage Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, Lutheran Brotherhood,
a Minnesota corporation, County of
Hennepin, Northern States Power
Company, a Minnesota corporation,
Vanity Cleaners, Weight Watchers
International, Inc., Donald Nelson
dba Lyndale Laundromat and
Barbershop, Young and Company,
Commerical Investment Company,
,.,__.,.?_...?.. Richfield Investment Company, a
Minnesota corporation, Richfield
Bank & Trust Company, a Minnesota
corporation, Orl.ns and Brainerd,
International Coin, Inc., Hopsen
Enterprises, Roy laFayette, Long
Mile Rubber, George Maurer
Construction Company, Medical
Personnel Pool, Larry Messerli,
Okerman Construction, Inc.,
Okerman, Susee and Lee, Preferred
Companies Thorpe Brothers, Wyant
& Morgeson, Dr. Roy Peterson,
Reiter Realty and Tax Service, Dr.
Earl M. Christienson, Burton Rutman
& Palmer C. Siegel, dba Lyndale
Fruit & Vegetable Market, Belle
Rutman, Sam Rutman, Theodore R.
Goldman, Stuart M. Fridell, Nancy
Fridell, Sheldon A. Vermes, Richard
F. Sachs, Peggy J. Vermes, Elaine
Sachs, Mitchell I. Kirshbaum,
Roberta G. Kirshbaum, Arnold L.
Goldman, Sylvia Goldman, Twin City
Federal Savings & Loan Association
E. Norman Barsness, Lois Helen
Barsness, Gro-'.;o Sales Company, a
Minnesota corporation, Burton
Rutman is trustee of the Miriam
Siegel, Michael Siegel and Evan
Siegel Trust, Burton Rutman,
Palmer C. Siegel, Lyndale Fruit.&
Vegetable Market, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, The Prudential
Insurance Company of America, a
New Jersey corporation,
Respondents.
DISTRICT COURT
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FILE NO. CD 1583
STIPULATION RELATING
TO THE TAKING OF
TITLE AND POSSESSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LAND IN THE COU17TY OF
HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PURPOSES
•
WHEREAS, the petitioner has commenced the above entitled
action for the condemnation of an interest in certain lands more
fully described in its Petition now on file with the Clerk of
District Court; and
1,MEREAS, the undersigned respondents are all the owners
and interest holders in those tracts of land which is the subject
of such condemnation and described in said Petition as Parcels 44,
45, and 46 and
WHEREAS, the petitioner has duly served upon the under-
signed respondents its Notice of Intent to Take Title and Possession,
such service being effective July 17, 1979; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto are desirous of achieving a
mutually acceptable agreement relating to the taking of title and
possession to the easement areas which are the subject of this
action, as well as adjusting and stipulating to other matters,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY stipulated and agreed as
follows:
1. That the petitioner shall, prior to October 17, 1979,
deposit with the'Court Administrator a check in the-amount of
petitioner's approved appraisal to be deposited in an interest
bearing account for the benefit of all parties entitled to compen-
sation.
2. That the petitioner shall be given, as to these
respondents, title and possession of the easement areas described
in its Petition on and from October 17, 1979.
3. That the undersigned respondents hereby grant
permission, authority and right to enter upon the respondent's
property, including, but not limited to, the property which is
the subject of this action for the purpose of removing from the
subject easement areas, fences, signs, posts and lights and
relocating such as designated by respondent on property owned
by respondent, but outside of the easement area. Such authority,
right and permission shall be effective from the date of this
.7
• stipulation. All such work to be paid by petitioner. Petitioner
will also be liable for damage to property resulting from reloca-
tion.
4. That the undersigned respondents may notify the peti-
tioner in writing prior to such relocation activity being commenced
that certain posts and lights subject to relocation have no remain-
ing value or useful life and donating them to the City. The City
shall then remove any such structures from the easement area and
dispose of them as it sees fit.
5. That nothing in this stipulation shall affect or
be construed to affect the right of respondents to contest the
compensation proposed by petitioner or the respondent's right to
appear and give testimony before commissioners as to the level of
compensation, or to appeal from any award.
6. This Court may approve this stipulation and, as
to these undersigned respondents, approve the transfer of fee
title and possession to the petitioner effective on October 17,
• 1979.
Dated: PETITIONER:
CITY OF RICHFIELD; MINNESOTA
By
Loren L. Law
Its Mayor
By
Karl Nollenberger
Its City ganage?
f
/RESIPNDE-NNTTSS .
Burt Rutman, individually and
as trustee of the Mariam Siegel,
Michael Siegel and Evean Siegel
trusts
/(.? I /? an,l2
1-3
Belle Rutman
LYNDAL_E FRUIT AND_V-DCH,TABLE MARKET,
/ ) - INC.
Its.
B v
_.
Its
v!
;y
0
•
NORTHERN STATES POFIER CUIPANY
By
Its
By
Its
9
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
City of Richfield, a Pinnesota
Municipal corporation,
Petitioner,
Helen Bard, Ernest Goldblatt,
Sara Jean Rotstein,
Roslyn Tarshish, Sam I. Pichey,
Delores Pichey, Irving Pichey, aka
Yisroel Chaim Pichey,
Donya Pichey, Lyndale Hardware, a
Minnesota corporation, Tower
Mortgage Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, Lutheran Brotherhood,
a Minnesota corporation, county of
Hennepin, Northern States Power
Company, a Minnesota corporation,
Vanity Cleaners, Weight Watchers
International, Inc., Donald Nelson
dba Lyndale Laundromat and
Barbershop, Young and Company,
Commerical Investment Company,
Richfield Investment Company, a
Minnesota corporation, Richfield
Bank & Trust Company, a Minnesota
• corporation, Orlins and Brainerd,
international Coin, Inc., Hopsen
Enterprises, Roy laFayette, Long
Mile Rubber, George Maurer
Construction Company, Medical
Personnel Pool, Larry Messerli,
Okerman Construction, Inc.,
Okerman, Susee and Lee, Preferred
Companies Thorpe Brothers, wyant
& Morgeson, Dr. Roy Peterson,
Reiter Realty and Tax Service, Dr.
Earl M. Christienson, Burton Rutman
& Palmer C. Siegel, dba Lyndale
Fruit & Vegetable Market, Belle
Rutman, Sam Rutman, Theodore R.
Goldman, Stuart M. Fridell, Nancy
Fridell, Sheldon A. Vermes, Richard
F. Sachs, Peggy J. Vermes, Elaine
Sachs, Mitchell I. Kirshbaum,
Roberta G. Kirshbaum, Arnold L.
Goldman, Sylvia Goldman, Twin City
Federal Savings & Loan Association
E. Norman Barsness, Lois Helen
Barsness, Gro-ko Sales Company, a
Minnesota corporation, Burton
Rutman is trustee of the Miriam
Siegel, Michael Siegel and Evan
Siegel Trust, Burton Rutman,
Palmer C. Siegel, Lyndale Fruit &
Vegetable Market, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, The Prudential
Insurance Company of America, a
New Jersey corporation,
Respondents.
VS.
DISTRICT COURT
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FILE NO. CD 1DS3
STIPULATION RELATING
TO THE TAKING OF
TITLE AND POSSESSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN LAND IIJ THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMEi1T PURPOSES
•
WHEREAS, the petitioner has commenced the above entitle
action for the condemnation of an interest in certain lands more
fully described in its Petition now on file with the Clerk of
District Court; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned respondents are all the owners
and interest holders in those tracts of land which is the subject
of such condemnation and described in said Petition as Parcels 27,
and 29 and
WHEREAS, the petitioner has duly served upon the under-
signed respondents its Notice of Intent to Take Title and Possession,
such service being effective July 17, 1979; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto are desirous of achieving a
mutually acceptable agreement relating to the taking of title and
possession to the easement areas which are the subject of this
action, as well as adjusting and--stipulating to other matters,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY stipulated and agreed as
follows:
1. That the petitioner shall, prior to October 17, 1979,
deposit with the-Court Administrator a check in the,amount of
petitioner's approved appraisal to be deposited in an interest
bearing account for the benefit of all parties entitled to compen-
sation.
2. That the petitioner shall be given, as to these
respondents, title and possession of the easement areas described
in its Petition on and from October 17, 1979.
3. That the undersigned respondents hereby grant
permission, authority and right to enter upon the respondent's
property, including, but not limited to, the property which is
the subject of this action for the purpose of removing from the
subject easement areas, fences, signs, posts and lights and
relocating such as designated by respondent on property owned
by respondent, but outside of the easement area. Such authorit,:,
right and permission shall be effective from the date of this
stipulation. All such work to be paid by petitioner. Petitioner
will also be liable for damage to property resulting from reloca-
tion.
4. That the undersigned respondents may notify the peti-
tioner in writing prior to such relocation activity being commenced
that certain posts and lights subject to relocation have no remain-
ing value or useful life and donating them to the City. The City
shall then remove any such structures from the easement area and
dispose of them as it sees fit.
5. That nothing in this stipulation shall affect or
be construed to affect the right of respondents to contest the
compensation proposed by petitioner or the respondent's right to
appear and give testimony before commissioners as to the level of
compensation, or to appeal from any award.
6. This Court may approve this stipulation and, as
to these undersigned respondents, approve the transfer of fee
title and possession to the petitioner effective on October 17,
1979. '
Dated: PETITIONER:
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
By
Loren L. Law
Its Mayor
By
Karl Nollenberger
Its City ManaS}e?
RESPONDENTS:
o
Burt Rutman, individually and
as trustee of the Mariam Siegel,
Michael Siegel and Evean Siegel
trusts
3 b 1 4L
Be=e Rutman
LYNDALE RUIT ANrVEG BLE MARKET,
INC.
By,
Its
By
I t S
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
By
Its
By
Its
E. Normal Barsn s
? 1-1:,. -6:5. Lois Helen Barsness/
Palmer Si.a?jel
GRO-KO SALES COMPANY
By 1
Its
By
• Its
C?o
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 324
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City'Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subjegt: Recommendation for Denial of Taxicab
Drivers License
The city has received an application for a taxicab drivers
license from Mr. John Jordan Kampmeyer, Jr. The background in-
vestigation conducted by the public safety department with re-
gard to this license application reveals that the applicant has
a past history of traffic violation convictions. Mr. Kampmeyer
was convicted for traffic violations on April 4, 1978, and again
on December 29, 1978. As a result of these convictions, his
drivers license was suspended on April 17, 1978. Mr. Kampmeyer's
• license was reinstated on July 24, 1979. The public safety de-
partment policy used as a standard in approving applications for
taxicab drivers license requires a minimum of one year driving
experience which is free from traffic violation convictions.
It is the opinion of the public safety director, in which I
concur, that this record of traffic violation convictions relates
directly to the license the applicant is seeking, and it is
recommended that the city council deny this request for a taxicab
drivers license.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
•
KN/eja
cc: Acting City Clerk
Public Safety Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 323
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
5
Subject: Change Order, City Project No. 742
L/H/N Area Improvements
There is an item on the October 22, 1979 city council agenda
requesting council authorization to execute a change order in
the amount of $24,517 in the contract with Victor Carlson & Sons,
Inc., for L/H/N area improvements.
This change order provides for a total addition of $24,517
and a subtraction of $950 for a net addition of $23,567.
is The work covered by this change order includes the driveway
off 65th Street for the new Nelson's Restaurant at 65th and Nic-
ollet Avenue in the amount of $2,800. Part II of this change
order is the removal of sidewalk and curb and gutter on old 65th
Street through the Summit Bank property and blacktopping same, in
the amount of $6,915. Part III is the reopening of Pillsbury
Avenue at 65th Street in the amount of $11,830. Part IV is the
construction of bituminous curb at 66th and 65th Street inter-
sections on Lyndale Avenue and a bituminous walk at 65th and Lyn-
dale Avenue. This cost is $2,972. Part V is a subtraction of $950
from the contract for the elimination of plantings at the Plaza
Center.
The curb cut for Nelson's, removal of the old 65th Street
surface, curb gutter and reopening of Pillsbury Avenue at 65th
Street were authorized by the council in separate actions earlier
this year. All of these items have been added to the Carlson
contract because Schafer, the contractor responsible for the 65th
Street construction was substantially finished with his work be-
fore the decisions were made regarding this additional work and
it appeared most efficient and least costly to include the work
with the Carlson contract, rather than calling back Shafer. The
bituminous curb at 65th Street and 66th Street is a temporary
curbing, necessary because the final signal locations have not
been designated. When the signalization placement is confirmed,
permanent curbs will be installed. The reduction results from
r
I
Council Letter No. 323 -2- October 22, 1979
reorganization of the central plaza area, to fit better with
01 the proposed sculpture.
It is recommended that the city council approve this change
order in the amount of $23,557 to City Project No. 742.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
cc: Acting Planning Director
Actinq Public Works Director
Finance Coordinator
•
C7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 322
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Energy Awareness Committee Appointments
On the October 22, 1979 city council agenda there is an item
concerning the appointment of members to the Energy Awareness
Committee. Since the last appeal by the city council, there have
been two additional applications for appointment to the Energy
Awareness Committee. The applicants are Ms. Sharon Erding, 6742
Clinton Avenue and Dennis Louis, 6300 4th Avenue. We would recommend
their appointment to the committee at this time. In addition, since
there would be only four citizen members of the committee, it is
suggested that two city employees be appointed to the committee to
round out its number. I would recommend that the Maintenance Super-
intendent and the City Engineer become active members of the comm-
ittee. The Maintenance Superintendent is responsible for mainten-
ance and operation of all city facilities. He is in an excellent
position to help in the on-going effort to conserve energy. The
City Engineer will provide expertise from an engineering viewpoint
in this effort. If additional citizens express interest as this
project gets underway, we can enlarge the size of the committee.
It is my intent that the Director of Community Services and
myself will both be involved with the Energy Awareness Co=,aittee.
There is a significant amount of literature which is becoming
available on energy awareness projects which have been conducted
in other cities. We should be able to emanate these other projects
as well as achieve some unique energy conservation efforts of our
own. The capital improvements program recommended to the City
Council by the City Manager includes monies in the 1980 appropri-
ation for energy related construction efforts. One of the first
tasks of the corunittee will be working with the city staff and.
whatever consultant may be necessary to analyze energy conserva-
tion efforts; this will hopefully get the committee off to a
flying start.
Full council support for this project is imperative to its
success. The City Council may desire to appoint a council liaison to
the committee to facilitate communication. In addition, a resolution
is enclosed with this council letter to enable the flayor and Council
to indicate their public commitment to the energy conservation
•
cc: Acting City Engineer
Community Services Director
Maintenance Superintendent
KN/eja
•
Council Letter No. 322 -2-
October 22, 1979
program. It is recommended that the city council adopt the
resolution, appoint the members to the Energy Awareness Committee,
and authorize the initiation of an energy conservation program
for the City of Richfield.
Respectfully submitted,
i '
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
0
Date October 17, 1979
i
C?
APPLICAiTION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOII TNIEN-11
NAME Louis Dennis Michael
Last ,= irst N iGule
HOME ADDRESS 6300 4th Ave. So. Richfield, MN 55423
Street No. City Zip Code
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address)
Street No.
PHONE: Home
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comm,
Senior Citizen & Handicapped
Advisory Commission
Human Rights Commission
Civil Service Commission
Advisory Board of Health
Other Energy Commission
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this
municipal commission/ committee and why you are interested in ser,,ing :
I have a B.S. Degree in Industrial Arts which gives me a broad working knowledge of
architectural concepts. I have experience in computer maintenance and the proper
environment for computer operation. I have installed a furnace and hot water heater
in my home. I have insulated, sheetrocked and am finishing off the upper level of my
home. In doing this project I have become very familiar with the conflicts-between the
State Building Code and energy efficient design for the average home owner.. I enjoy
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: reading technical journals
regarding energy and alternate
sources.
Coordinator for Spartan Hi 4-H Club, Vice President Elliot Elementary PTA,
Member of Post 435 American Legion, and past Nation Chief YMCA Guides
Coe
866=0162 Business 331-4050
OCCUPATION:
Employing firm, agency Oantel Corporation
Address 416 E. Hennepin, Minneapolis, MN 55414
Position Senior Field Engineer years w/firrr/agencY Three years,
Other work experience (optional)
Olivetti Corporation of America - Field Engineer
s
REFERENCES (Optional)
A. Gertrude Ulrich Friend
Full name Relationship
7601 Aldrich Ave. So., Richfield 866--8171
Mailing address Phone number
B. George Seltz Friend
Full name Relationship
6726 Pillsbury Ave. So., Richfield 861-5615
Mailing address Phone number
C. -Jeffrey Thiele Brother-In-Law
Full name Relationship
7527 Chicago Avenue So., Richfield 869-1078
Mailing address
Phone number
Return to: City Manager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield SS423
0
Att: Eileen Anderson
ate
APPL.ICATICN "UP ;'IT CT P\1 'I-II'IEI.J
ADVISORY COM'viiTTFE OR-' OI. MISSION APPOiI?;Tti'F'
NAME _y?s?t1Y? ?,_a2
Last ir._..
I I
HOME ADDRESS < 74-) t -
Street No. c It
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from hone address`
ZiP
Street No.
PHONE: Home Business
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission Hurr.an Rights Com..mission
Park and Recreation Advisorv Comm. C'vii Service C-'=Mission
Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board o_` Iealth
Other l-
Advisory Commission
rneP3 r C u.?
Briefly discuss aspects of your exoerien ce ::>hi&I you beLe:?e cu 1ifr .you far this
municipal commission; committee and ,Vh'7r %"OU are ;nterested in servir:g:
i
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU"?TY ACTIVITIES:
i
rh
f ?
u
RESOLUTION NO.
Resolution Supporting International Energy
Conservation Month, October 1979
WHEREAS, the United States is the largest user of energy in
the world and since 1973 has become increasingly dependent on im-
ported oil to meet its domestic needs, and
WHEREAS, while considerable progress has been made in reducing
the rate of growth in demand for energy, much more remains to be
done if the United States is to meet its responsibility to reduce
its demand for petroleum on the world market, and
WHEREAS, energy problems facing us in the United States are
similar to those facing other industrialized nations, as well as
many of the world's less developed countries. The fundamental
problem domestically and internationally is that demand for petrol-
eum is increasing faster than the capacity to produce it, and
WHEREAS, as the world's major consumer of energy, it is es-
sential that the United States become a leader in conserving energy
• by curtailing unnecessary and wasteful uses, by improving the ef-
ficiency with which we use energy for essential purposes, and by
switching from increasingly scarce petroleum and petroleum products
to more abundant alternate sources.
NOW,THEREFORE, I, Loren L. Law, Mayor of the City of Richfield,
in full support of this international program, do proclaim October
1979 as International Energy Conservation Month in the City of Rich-
field and call upon all citizens to join me in observing it. During
the month let us as a city focus our attention on energy conserva-
tion through our actions and deeds. Let us view that month as the
springboard to a more energy-efficient, energy-reliable future.
I call upon the citizens of the City of Richfield to support
and aid the Richfield Energy Awareness Committee in their pursuit
of programs and projects which will help conserve our vital re-
sources. I offer the full help and support of the city council to
this effort.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this
22nd day of October, 1979.
0 ATTEST:
Loren L. Law Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 321
Agenda October 22, 1979
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Authorization to Execute Agreement with
Richfield Investment Company and the
Richfield State Agency
On October 9, 1979, the city council established just compen-
sation for a permanent easement, for sidewalk purposes, across the
property occupied by Richfield Bank & Trust Company, This ease-
ment abuts the building.
The bank has indicated a willingness to donate this easement
to the city. However, the bank has expressed concern that there
• may be a future time when their development project is substantially
completed, that it would be desirable for them to abandon this
easement. In that event, the sidewalk would be installed within
the existing right-of-way at the expense of the city, as originally
planned. If the sidewalk were to be constructed at that location
within the Lyndale Avenue right-of-way next year, the bank's on-
site parking circulation will be seriously damaged. A sketch show-
ing the proposed easement area and the tentative bank expansion
plan, which would eliminate this easement, is attached.
The attached agreement provides for the following: donation of
the easement abutting the bank to the city; abandonment of this
easement after completion of the bank's contemplated development and
after installation of a sidewalk by the city within the existing
right-of-way, and removal of the driveway and installation of a
sidewalk in front of the Professional Building at the expense of
the bank.
It is recommended that the city council authorize the Mayor
and City Manager to execute the attached agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Acting Redevelopment Director
Acting Planning Director
Acting Public [corks Director
•
0
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day
of , 1979, by and between the Richfield Investment
Company, a Minnesota corporation, and the Richfield State Agency, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation, first parties and the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, second party.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the first parties are the owners of Lot 4 and
part of Lot 1, "J.N. Hauser's Addition", and Lot 10, Block 3, Lyndale
Shores on Wood Lake; and
WHEREAS, the first parties have by instrument, a copy
of which is attached herewith and made a part hereof as Exhibit A,
donated to the second party of perpetual easement for landscaping
and sidewalk purposes over, under, across and through a part of
said lots as more fully described in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties hereto to
recite certain stipulations and agreements relating to the use
and maintenance of the easement area conveyed in Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed and stipulated by and
between the parties hereto as follows:
1. The easement area conveyed in Exhibit A will be
developed substantially according to the sketch plan attached
herewith as Exhibit B.
2. The second party shall install and pay for a curb
cut on Lyndale in front of the professional Building located at
6637 Lyndale.
3. The easement may be abandoned under the following
conditions:
a) The mutual consent of the parties hereto as expressed
by resolutions of their respective governing bodies, or
b) The completion of a redevelopment project presently
contemplated by the parties. Such development will include, but
not be limited to the following:
i. construction of additional office and commercial
space by the first parties.
s
ii. construction of a parking ramp by the first parties.
iii. construction by the second party, of a ten foot wide
sidewalk within the Lyndale Avenue right-of-way as it was planned
prior to the conveyance contained in Exhibit A.
iv. at the expense of the first parties, removal of the
curb-cut and driveway in front of the Professional Building and
installation of sidewalk across the area which in design conforms
to that installed by the second party in the Lyndale Avenue right-
of-way.
4. The first parties shall, within a reasonable time
after the date hereof, execute and deliver to the second party,
an easement in recordable form evidencing the conveyance made in
Exhibit A.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their
hands the day and year first above written.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, A MINNESOTA
• MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By
Loren L. Law
Its Mayor
By
Karl Nollenberger
Its City Manager
RICHFIELD INVESTMENT COMPANY,
A MINNESOTA CORPORATION
By
Its
By
Its
RICHFIELD STATE AGENCY, INC.,
A MINNESOTA CORPORATION
By
Its
By
Its
s?
To Whom it May Concern:
The undersigned on behalf of the Richfield Investment Companv,
a Minnesota Corporation and Richfield State Agency, Incorporated,
a Minnesota Corporation has received from the City of Richfield
an offer to purchase a perpetual easement area for sidewalk and
landscaping purposes over, under, across and through that part
of Lots 1 and 4, Block 3, "J.N. Hauser's Addition" and Lot 10,
Block 3, Lyndale Shores on Wood Lake According to the recorded
plats thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said Block 3, "J.N.
Hauser's Addition"; thence on a bearing of East, assumed
basis for bearings 66.00 feet along the south line of said
Block 3, "J.N. Hauser's Addition" to the point of beginnina;
thence on a bearing of North 76.25 feet; thence on a bearing
of East 11.30 feet; thence on a bearing of North 23.67 feet;
thence on a bearing of East 18.50 feet; thence on a bearina_
of North 50.20 feet; thence North 21 degrees 58 minutes 19
seconds West, 10.50 feet; thence North 49 degrees 01 minutes
41 seconds West to the westerly line of said Block 3, "J.N.
Hauser's Addition", thence southwesterly 6.39 feet along said
westerly line; thence South 49 degrees 01 minutes 41 seconds
East 32.39 feet; thence South 21 degrees 58 minutes 19 seconds
West 168.22 feet; thence on a bearing of West to the westerly
line of said Block 3, "J.N. Hauser's Addition", thence south-
westerly 6.42 feet along said westerly line and southerly
extension; thence on a bearing of East to a line bearing
South from the point of beginning; thence North along said
line to the point of beginning.
The description of the easement and the offering price was contained
in the offering letter mentioned above.
• It is understood that the offering price represents the reduction
in the value of the entire parcel and was determined by subtractina_
the fair market value of the entire parcel after the easement
taking from the present fair market value of the entire parcel.
The undersigned, on behalf of the Richfield Investment Company,
a Minnesota Corporation, and Richfield State Agency, Incorporated,
a Minnesota Corporation, was offered an opportunity to accompany
the appraiser on his inspection of the property, and was informed
that we could hire our own appraiser to determine the easement
value and be reimbursed an amount not to exceed Three Hundred
Dollars ($300.00).
Finally, following review and consideration of the offering letter
by the governing board of the Richfield Investment Company, a
Minnesota Corporation, and Richfield State Agency, Incorporated,
a Minnesota Corporation, I have been authorized and directed and
hereby do donate the above described easement to the City of
Richfield.
Dated:
THE RICHFIELD INVESTMENT
COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION
THE RICHFIELD STATE AGENCY By
A MINNESOTA CORPORATION
By
Its
By
Its
Its
By
Its
a
-_'. ,. ?. '.. ..•.. .•?.-. ? r....-r._.:... ....:...: '. ..::nr-vr+.. ... ...?,3,b1^ •tv.a+.? ]Y. .S.-n T Mf'ty.J.re?nr.af ...?.t "V'i 2. I.VC.? _
"FE
CITY 0.1F "RIC"m lt=LD
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENT AQl!lSITION
oQ
t?
TOTAL AREA PARCEL NUMBER
RIGHT-OF-WAY APPARENT OWNER
NET AREA :R
h.: ?.
PERMANENT EASEMENT 9405
TEMPORARY EASEMENT
i
i
?d
I ? G
2 `--
1
67 •r ?
i
a ?,N
9J•? ?H%0
`fin spry ?
a?• ` JJ
b?
k
? E
Tom' I
E gTqTux?
Sx