06-01-81 agendaHOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Office of Executive Director
EXTRA ITEM
HRA Letter No. 22
Agenda June 1, 1981
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Commissioners
City of Richfield
Dear Commissioners:
Subject: Authorization to Request a Finding From the
Planning Commission
The city staff has recently been working with representatives
of Richfield State Agency (RSA) to facilitate the construction of
their new development. RSA has retained the professional services
~.f several organizations to assist in the formulation of a develop-
ment package; Gruen, Gruen & Associates examined market economic
feasibility, Myers & Bennett of BRW has undertaken design work,
and Juran and Moody are the financial consultants for a probable
tax exempt note.
• The first phase of construction would be initiated late this
year or in 1982. RSA envisions the construction of about 40,000
square feet of commercial and office space, the relocation and
modernization of the drive-in facilities, and possible expansion
of the medical office building at 66th Street and Grand Avenue.
This first phase would cost approximately four million dollars.
To achieve Phase I, it will be necessary for RSA to own the land
now occupied by Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) at 67th Street and
Lyndale Avenue and the land occupied by Bjorn Hagen Furs at 66th
Street and Lyndale Avenue.
Contact has been made with both KFC and Mr. Hagen regarding
the need for their property. Because discussions have only just
been initiated, the details have not been worked out. However,
it appears at this time it may be desirable for the HRA to
purchase these properties. If continued discussions verify this
strategy, a modification to the L/H/N plan would be necessary.
That is, these two properties would have to be identified for
purchase by the HRA. To expedite this process, it would be
desirable to seek an opinion from the planning commission at their
June meeting. The commission would be requested to find that the
proposed purchase and subsequent resale of these two parcels by
the HRA was in conformance with the comprehensive plan.
HRA Letter No. 22
-2-
June 1, 1981
RSA has made certain commitments to facilitate the HRA
purchases of these properties. For the Hagen parcel, they will
pay the HRA a fair market value based on its existing condition
as a viable commercial property. Secondly, if the HRA pursues
the purchase of the Clark Oil property as a possible relocation
resource for KFC and is unable to successfully conclude nego-
tiations for the redevelopment of this parcel, RSA will pay for
the site.
It is recommended that the city council request the
planning commission consider at their June meeting conformance
to the comprehensive plan of the possible purchase by the HRA
' of the KFC~and Bjorn Hagen Fur property.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
-,~' ~,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
•
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Office of Executive Director
HRA Letter No. 21
Agenda June 1, 1981
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Commissioners
City of Richf field
Dear Commissioners:
Subject: Authorization to Advertise for the Sale
and Removal of Buildings from the Multi-
Family Site
The HRA has previously expressed a strong desire to have
the homes on the multi-family site moved rather than demolished.
Attached to this letter are Specifications for Purchase and Re-
moval of Buildings. These specifications will be used as the
basis for soliciting bids for the removal of the dwellings, when
a developer for the multi-family housing site is selected. Bids
will be accepted from any interested individual. Submitted
sealed bids must include an affidavit, performance security and
bid security. The contract shall be awarded to the highest re-
sponsible bidder. However, the HRA reserves the right to reject
any or all bids.
The successful bidders will be authorized in writing when
they may proceed with the house removals. Authorization will not
be given until the houses are vacant and the utilities are ter-
minated. Tree removal will only be permitted after authorization
by the city staff. The successful bidder is responsible for the
cost of tree removal and ether debris.
All the dwellings purchased must be removed by a date to be
designated by the city staff, which will reflect the needs of the
developer and also the status of the street improvements on Lyndale
Avenue and 66th Street. The multi-family site developer will then
be responsible for demolition of the remaining buildings and all
foundation removal. All of the houses within the multi-family site
have been included in this proposal. The properties at 709 and
715 Graham Avenue are outside the multi-family site, but have
been included for removal. The city staff will delete these
properties from the offering if it seems inappropriate to vacate
and remove them along with the other structures at the time that
the bids are solicited.
It is recommended that the HRA adopt the attached resolution
authorizing the call for bids for this work.
Respectfully submitted,
/' '`
~' ~,
Rarl Nollenberger
Executive Director
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
'' ~ RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING
AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
APPROVING THE ADVERTISING FOR THE
SALE AND REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield,
Minnesota (H RA) did on October 15, 1975, approve a redevelopment
plan for an urban renewal project for the Lyndal-Hub-Nicollet area
of Richfield; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota did on
November 24, 1975, approve of the Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Plan designated certain properties for acquisition
by the HRA; and,
WHEREAS, the HRA now owns 709, 715, 719, 723, 727, 6611, 6610,
6608, 6600 Graham Ave. and 6607 and 6615 Lake Shore Drive; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to attempt to preserve
these dwellings rather than to destroy them; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to clear these properties to provide
for new development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RICHFIELD HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Executive Director is authorized to solicit bids for
the removal of dwellings according to the attached specifications.
Thomas E. Harms, Chairman
ATTESTED:
Michael Freeman, Secre tary
i
•
-_ -
.r~al~wiit ~-- _ , _ --_ J I - 3 5 W
.~.~.:,
~~f
f
._~..
>,
i
~`.
`.~i
1 i 4
'~ ',~ ` IYNw DUD ~ - ~ ~ i - ~DUPOn2 4Yf_.~-_
e<
,,
~Y
-~-- = -1 J
~~- _
p~ / ____/ ~ i i D
~a ~ as _ ' I N
y~+o ~' _
i~ ~ ~ ~ __ V p u~~- _ ~,,_i~~~~ 2
_ ~~~~~ ~ i ~~ ~
~_ \ j~ \_
~~T ~ ^~_^~~. - > \ ~~ I -~-.__._ HARRIET AV,f~ J
~~
_~ --- _ -_ - i _ - - VIEASANT AVC. I
. ._ ~~ ~ILLS• AVC. I'.
~yK _ ~ ~ _
N I - j , , j-- -----
~ ~ ~ I
- M rt ~O p w[Nrwo~rn AvE. ~ .(
r m o n - I i I' '''~~, ~
~. o~ ~ ~ i r---~ i ~j I I I I
O (~ H' i (n J T~-_~ r--C IAISD[ll AV [. -
~ ~ ~ NICOII[i f
°' o, ~ ~ ~-- , _ ~ ~~
~ - ' ~~
C ~ ; ---- -_ -- I
z ~_~. - ~ _-------- ---- - -~_. - -__-~-,
- ~''
0 -_
D ~- T - - ST[vE!~S . L _I__ _~. -~' - - ~~~ - --'• _ ~ - - ~ ~j- ~ l i
~o - - - ~_., ~-~_ - - -- -- ------- - ~ I
p X',' ~ ~ ~ ^ ` L~lNDAL` / HUS / NiCt~LLET~
' ~ ~ ;COMMERCIAL ~MPRDVEMENT'
~,
g ~ ~PRC:lGRAM RICHFIELL7, MN,
.__~__ J
SPECIFICATIONS FOR PURCHASE AND REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS
RICHFIELD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1. INVITATION OF BIDS: .Sealed bids will be received at the office of
the Ric fie Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (HRA), City Hall,
6700 Portland Ave., Richfield, MN 55423, until:
- ~- for t e Purc ase an Remova o Bui ings esignate on t e attac e
proposal form.
.. 2. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: The successful bidder shall furnish all
labor, materia an equipment and shall perform all services and
required work to purchase and remove the fisted structures in strict
accordance with the specifications and in accordance with the local
ordinances pertaining to the moving of .buildings and structures.
No oral interpretations or information shall be given to any bidder,
and any request for such shall be made in writing and addressed and
.__-._. _ forwarded to the HRA, City Hall, 6700 Portland Ave., Richfield, MN
55423. Any requests for information must be received by the HRA no
later than 5working days prior to bid opening. All the interested
people will receive copies of requested information.
It is expressly understood and agreed to by the bidder that right and
title of the buildings and structures which may be purchased by him/her
does not create any right or title to land or premises upon which the
buildings and structures are now located.
-_ - - -- _ 3. EXAMINATION OF SITE: All bidders are expected to visit the site
- of the wor an in orm themselves as to existing conditions, and
failure to do so shall is no way relieve the successful bidder from
performing the work as required for completion of the contract by the
end moving date.
The buildings will be open for inspection, with a representative of the
Richfield HRA on site, on Saturday,
between the hours of 10:00 a.m. until :0 p.m.
4. DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS: All bidders contemplating the removal of
. _ buildings over a trunk highway, city street, county or township road
shall ascertain in advance the conditions under which a permit for such
moving will be granted by the appropriate authority. Traffic shall not
•~ be obstructed unless under permit of the proper authorities.
The HRA assumes no responsibility for the condition of the buildings
and structures on the premises covered in the list, nor their continuance
in the existing conditions after the delivery by the HRA by bill of
sale. All damage or loss by reason of fire, theft, or other casualties
to the buildings and structures covered in the list and purchased by
the bidder shall be at the risk of the bidder, and no damage or loss
shall relieve the successful bidder from any obligations under his/her
... bid following the delivery of a bill of sale.
The successful bidder shall, at his/her own expense, obtain all
required licenses and permits and bonds required by a municipality.
The successful bidder shall completely seal the sanitary sewer where
it leaves the dwelling in a manner acceptable to the inspection
department. The fiRA will request termination of other utilities
prior to releasing the structure to the successful bidder for moving.
All expenses arising from or in conjunction with the performance of the
provisions of this paragraph shall be borne by the successful bidder.
.~..:..i-. ...__.._ ....._ .. _ ..-..
Page 2
Under no circumstances shall trees be removed from any site without
the written consent of the HRA. All trees not to be removed must be
wrapped with lumber or other appropriate materials to provide
protection during the moving process.. Only sod and shrubbery im-
„~~~~~:..~~+ ._s_.....~:.::-:i; mediately adjacent to the dwelling may be removed without the consent
~..,,..a..--. ~:
. - - of the HRA.
Work for removing the buildings or structures shall~be carried on in
-. _...:..-...~..:-:,:.,.__:.._:-: ..,_.___:_ ..... P g Y property. The bidder
-'-' a manner that will reclude dama e to an other
agrees to be solely liable for and to protect the HRA against any
damages or claims of damages, on account of damage or injury to
buildings, property or any persons, resulting from work performed under
_ these specifications. Evidence of satisfactory insurance covering
these conditions must be presented. An insurance binder of a minimum
of $500,000 of Public Liability Insurance is required and must be
submitted to the HRA within five (5) working days following written
------- ---. - - -. notice of bid acceptance.
All salvage material and/or debris shall be removed from the premises
and shall not be stored or burned on the site including any trees, the
" ~- removal of which was consented to, by the HRA. Tree roots need not
be removed.
.The successful bidder shall provide and maintain all proper or necessary
danger or other signs and lights as safeguards to the public for the
elimination of all hazards. Foundation excavations must be fenced after
"-"'" ""' ''"' "" ""` -'"`°"" - "`-'"'-" the removal of the house or structure from t e foun anon by t e bidder.
The HRA shall assume responsibility for the removal of the foundations
sidewalk, etc., at such time as the building has been satisfactorily
removed and the performance bond has been returned to .the successful
bidder.
The successful bidder may begin to obtain the permits and licenses for
the work to be completed but may not enter the dwelling or property and
commence any work until the HRA authorizes, in writing, to begin. The
HRA-will. give authorization promptly after the tenants vacate the property
The successful bidder shall complete the removal of the buildings or
structures from the site on or before 1981.
'' Performance of the obligations of the successful bidder are subject to
' acceptance of the work by the HRA.
' S. BID ACCEPTANCE: The contract shall be awarded to the highest
- responsible bidder. The HRA, however, reserves the right to reject
any or all bids and to waive formalities herein.
Any sale, transfer or conveyance of the dwellings, garages,. etc., by
the successful bidder to a third party does not remove the obligation
- of the successful bidder in fulfilling his/her obligation as outlined
in the specifications. Upon the acceptance of the bid by the HRA, the
HRA relinquishes all right and title in the buildings to be removed by
the bidder, to the successful bidder, and he/she shall be entitled to
all materials in the building and structures so removed. Any piping,
conduits, cables and other equipment belonging to public service
companies or others shall not become the property of the bidder unless
abandoned by the various companies or persons owning or controlling same.
6. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS:
a) The attached affidavit must be completed and returned with the
proposal form. Failure to include said affidavit shall result in
rejection of bid.
_ .__.
Page 3
b) All bids under $1,000.00 must be accompanied by a bid security for
the total amount of the bid for said building(s) or structure(s).
All bids $1,000.00 or more must be accompanied by a bid security
of at least $1,000.00. Bids in these two catagories must be
accompanied by a performance security of $3,000.00. Bids on garages
are exempt from. the performance security requirement. Any bids
of $10,000.00 or more must be accompanied by a bid security of
_ _.. -_ ---'~ -- 25~ of the amount bid. Full payment will be required within two (2)
weeks of bid acceptance. Bi security s all be in t e form of a
certifie c ec , cashier's check or money order (cash not acceptable),
,_.____.._,, _ payable to the HRA, Richfield, MN. A bill of sale will be delivered
to the successful bidder upon full payment of the total bid amount.
c) Where a performance security is required, it must be in the form of
a bond with sureties satisfactory to the HRA or a certified check,
cashier's check or money order, payable to the Richfield HRA.
If upon the acceptance of the bid by .written notice to the. successful
___ _ __ __ __ bidder, said bidder declines to accept or carry out his/her bid,
_ "`~ the money deposited, as a bid security as represented by a certified
- check, cashier's check or money order, together with the performance
security in the form of a performance bond or certified check,
_.." _ __.. cashier's or money order, accompanying. the proposal, shall be
forfeited to the HRA, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages
sustained as a result of such failure.
d) Bid security posted by unsuccessful bidders shall be returned as
soon as award .has been determined by the HRA, except for-the 1st
. _ ._.._~.,.._.__._~, and 2nd place bidders. The 1st place bid shall be administered as
. - ... ~ indicated in this agreement. The 2nd place bid security will be
returned upon receipt by the HRA of the full bid payment from the
1st place bidder.
7. IMPORTANTc The following items must be reported to the HRA,
before any work is started:
a) In the event that the structure(s) has been sold, transferred or
• conveyed to a third party, notification of the parties involved
must be given to the HRA.
b) Following the removal of the structure(s), the successful bidder
must notify the HRA, telephone: 869-7521, ext. 532, in order that
•• ,~ acknowledgment of satisfactory completion may be noted through the
... release of the bidder's performance surety.
In the. event there is any substantial breach of conditions the HRA may
_ terminate the contract and the HRA will take such steps as necessary to
remove buildings or building moving equipment from the site and restore
site to safe condition and repair damage to public or private .property
and the successful bidder is liable for any such costs including any
fees for storage of equipment. If these costs exceed the amount of
.., money already paid to the HRA, the bidder will be held responsible for
the additional amount.
Bids must be submitted in duplicate typewritten or written in ink, along
wit t e attac e a i avit an must be enclosed in the envelope provided
by the HRA for this purpose along with the bid deposit indicated in #6.
8. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: All work must be completed and equipment
remove from t e site by 1981.
...-:k..v.,..-.,._... ... .. _ _. _
P R O P O S A L
(To be opened at 2:00 p.m.)
June 1981.
PURCHASER(S)
_ ADDRESS
CITY, STATE & ZIP
PHONE: Home
Work
for the Purchase and Removal of Structures along Graham Ave. So. and Lake Shore Drive,
- Richfield., Minnesota , all in accordance with the attached specifications.
LOT BLOCK ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BID A~~IOUNT
' Single Famil Dwellings
3 3 Fairwood 709 Graham ve~e.- l~ story ~~ finished
_..._... ._. .. Shores Addn. Richfield, Mn. attic, 3 bedrooms, 1 bath,
55423 hardwood floors, carpeting.
Exterior, wood siding with
wood trim.
Approximately 1,360 square
feet. $
... _ _ .. 4 3 Fairwood 715 Graham Ave. 1 story with unfinished
Shores Addn. Richfield, Mn. attic, 2 bedrooms, 1 bath.
55423
Exterior, wood lap, siding. •
Approximately 896 square
feet $
6 3 Fairwood 719 Graham Ave. 2 story, 4 bedrooms, 1'2
Shores Addn. Richfield, Mn. bath, sunporch, french
55423 doors, fireplace, oak
trim. Exterior, stucco.
Approximately 2,.050 square
feet $
.-, 7 3 Fairwood 723 Graham Ave, lZ story, 3 bedrooms, 1~
- Shores Addn. Richfield, Mn. bath, oak strip flooring,
55423 fireplace, porch.
Approximately 1,540 square
feet. $
8 3 Fairwood 727 Graham Ave. 1'-2 story split level, tuck
Shores Addn. Richfield, Mn. under garage, 3 bedrooms,
55423 1'z bath, hardwood floors
-., screen porch. Exterior,
brick and wood lap, siding.
Approximately 1,340 square
feet. $
9 3 Fairwood 6610 Graham Ave. 1 story with expansion attic
Shores Addn. Richfield, Mn. 3 bedrooms, 1 bath, fireplace.
Exterior is hardboard with-
minor stone finishing. House
has had minor fire damage.
Approximately 1,110 square
feet. $
10 3 Fairwood 6608 Graham Ave. 1`Z story with finished attic,
Shores Addn. Richfield, stn. 4 bedrooms, 1 bath, fire-
___ 55423 place, hardwood floors,
carpeting. Exterior, wood
shakes with wood trim.
Approximately 1,490 square
feet. $
Page Z
Proposal
LOT BLOCK
11 3 Fairwood
Shores Addn
9 1 Fairwood
Shores Addn.
- 14 3 Fairwood
Shores Addn
_ __ _ 15 3 Fairwood
- - - _ Shores Addn.
6 3 Fairwood
Shores Addn.
- .-, 7 3 Fairwood
' .. Shores Addn.
_ 9 3 Fairwood
Shores Addn.
14 3 Fairwood
. ... .. .. :.... .. ......... ..:. Shores Addn.
15 3 Fairwood
- Shores Addn.
ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BID AMOUNT
6600 Graham Ave. 2 story., 4 bedroom, 1
Richfield, Pffi. bath, oak strip flooring,
55423 walk up attic. Exterior,
stucco.
Approximately 1,450 square
feet. $
6611 Graham Ave. 1 story with unfinished attic,
Richfield, Mn. 2 bedroom, full bath, walk
55423 up attic, hardwood floors.
Exterior, wood shakes with
wood trim.
Approximately 720 square
feet. $
6607 Lake Shore Dr. li story wood frame, 4
Richfield, Mn. bedrooms, full bath, oak
55423 cabinettery, oak trim,
hardwood floors. Exterior,
wood lap. siding.
Approximately 1,550 square
feet, $
6615 Lake Shore Dr. 2 story, 4 bedrooms, 112
Richfield, Mn. bath, den, laundry room,
55423 large livingroom. Exterior,
wood shake siding, with
Pella double glaze windows.
Approximately 2,350 square
feet. $
Garages
719 Graham Ave. Single car garage - stucco,
Richfield, Mn. gate doors approximately
55423 (12'x18`). $
723 Graham Ave. Two car garage - stucco,
Richfield, Mn. gate doors approximately
55423 (22'x22'). $
6610 Graham Ave. Single car garage - wood
Richfield, Mn. siding, gate doors
55423 approximately (14'x20'). S
6607 Lake Shore Dr. Single car garage - 6"
Richfield, Mn. lap. siding, gate doors
55423 approximately (14'x20'). $
6615 Lake Shore Dr. Two car garage - wood
Richfield, Mn. siding, gate doors
55423 approximately (20'x22.5') $
TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID $
•
STRUCTURES MUST BE RE*tOVF.D ON OR BEFURE 1981
PROPOSAL ~NST BE SUBKITTEU IN DUPLICATE ON THIS FORM
AFFIDAVIT 21UST BE RETURNED WITH THIS BID
Page 3
Proposal
A certified check, cashier's check or money order in the amount of $
payable to the Richfield HRA, accompanies this proposal as a bid security. (See
paragraph (6b, page 3).) If applicable, a performance security as identified
(in paragraph 6b, page.3) in the amount of $ also accompanies this
proposal.
If upon the acceptance of the bid by written notice to the successful bidder,
said bidder declines to accept or carry out his/herbid, the money and/or performance
. __._.,,._. . ___.,,-.. _._.:.:,_--. -_.....•;._ bond deposited, as represented by a certified check, cashier's check, money order, or
bond, accompanying the proposal, shall be forfeited to the HRA, not as a penalty, but
as liquidated damages sustained as a result of such failure.
Failure to remove structures from the site, also results in a forfeiture of the
- - total bid dollar amount including the performance security.
_ ----- - -_.-- --- , _ , _ -.. SIGNED
- --~-- - These houses will be open for inspection Saturday,
from 10:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m.
- .-,
A
.~
NOTICE TO ALL BIDDERS
THE AFFIDAVIT BELOW IS TO BE FILLED OUT, NOTARIZED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR BID.
THE BID WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS THIS AFFIDAVIT IS ATTACHED.
AFFIDAVIT
State of MINNESOTA)
ss.
County of HENNEPIN)
(your name)
being first duly sworn deposes and says that he/she is the authorized representative of
(name of individual, partnership, or corp. submitting bid)
and that he/she has. the authority to make this affidavit for and on behalf of said
bidder, that he/she states of his/her own knowledge, that said bidder has not either
directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion
or other wise taken any action or restraint of free competitive bidding in
connection with this proposal or bid submitted on
(date)
That the contents of the bid were not communicated by the bidder or its
employees or agents to any person not an employee or agent of the bidder or its
surety on any bond furnished with the bid prior to the official opening of the bid;
and
That he/she has fully informed oneself regarding the accuracy of the statements
made in this affidavit.
(signature of bidder or authorized representative)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of
(Notary Public)
_ _._
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Office of Executive Director
r
HRA Letter No. 20
Agenda June 1, 1981
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Commissioners
City of Richf field
Dear Commissioners:
Subject: Establishment of Just Compensation and
Authorization to Purchase 6633 Lake Shore
Drive
Several months ago, Mr. and Mrs. Ashley Shevcheck, owners of
6633 Lake Shore Drive, indicated a desire to explore the possible
sale of their property to the HRA. Their home is one of the
three residences remaining along Lake Shore Drive (6617, 6633,
and 6639) which are not owned by the HRA. The property at 6633
Lake Shore is the middle property which lies adjacent to the
L/H/N project area (see attached map).
The HRA may legally purchase property only for public purposes.
A legally acceptable public purpose for acquiring this property
would be to provide housing for a large low income family under
our Section 8 program. The Schevcheck property could be occupied
as a four bedroom house. The largest family which could occupy
the home would be eight persons. This property does provide the
HRA with a unique opportunity to help meet the housing needs of a
large family. Presently, Richfield is meeting approximately eight
percent of the housing needs for large low income families. This
percentage will drop when the multi-family housing project is de-
veloped.
On June 23, 1981, the planning commission will review the
proposed aquisition of this property and make a finding as to its
compliance with the comprehensive municipal plan. The attached
resolution which would authorize purchase of this property, provides
that a purchase agreement will not be executed until the planning
commission has made a favorable finding. The appraisal work re-
quired by HUD has now been completed. O.J. Janski and Associates
appraised the property at $87,000. Capital Appraisals, Inc.
appraised it at $90,000 and the review appraiser, Mr. Donald
Hennessy, has recommended setting just compensation at $88,000.
The one and one-half story structure was built in 1952. It
contains approximately 1,445 square feet. The first Boor has a
recently remodeled kitchen with oak cabinets, dining room, living
roam with stone fireplace, two bedrooms and a full bath. The
second floor has two bedrooms. There is a detached double car
garage at the rear of the house.
__ _ __ _
' ~ HRA Letter No. 20
-2-
June 1 , 1 981
The estimated acquisition and relocation payments for this
property are approximately $104,000. This includes $88,000 for
purchase, and up to $16,000 for a replacement housing payment and
moving costs. Funding of approximately $64,000 would be provided
from the CDBG Year VI entitlement funds, and approximately
i $40,000 from the HRA General Fund.
Attached is a management proforma indicating the anticipated
income and expenses for this property. Our projections indicate
that the property should be self-supporting.
It is recommended that the HRA adopt the attached resolution,
establishing just compensation for this property at $88,000, auth-
orizing the staff to negotiate for the purchase of the property,
and transferring the needed funds from the HRA general fund to the
site acquisition fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
Executive Director
KN/ej a
cc: Community Development Director
Finance Coordinator
Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator
~. ~ -
,`
~.~' ~ r*,~ f.
-~
~~ ~ t
~`-~
1
t
''i
~.*-~~~s
~ ._-•,
~ , ~.4
• ._-
~ .~ ..
Ky~;~'"3+N?
- - _ ~ . 35W
_ -
3
_ 1.......„_., 1 1 1 .,; . _
^o _
_! 000, 9(-O _-__. ~ - 1 DUPOnT __ AVE. _ '
.~ ,-, r = ~ _ __.
- - ~ ~ `_ ` "i'' i '~ - - --
PI (SlE[4x nvE_..
~~\ ~ ~, ~ r ~ ~ - ..
%J
_. - ~ D C
o
.. RqF i, ~ ~.,~ Hv4ni AvE --
D
x
~~
om[~ii
~ EH
-fi ~ . `do
L / r~
~_
.r° _~ ~ __ ~~_~ ~o
~; i_ ~
~ ~~~~ '' `'-~ m ~ ~ E,~..~--- - ~ ~~Z
\~ ~~ ~_ _ j
_`~ -
~~ J~ ~'
~ - ~ ~c~
I " - \ _ - - _ ' -- -G [TEED PVE: ~'
T" 1s _ ~ J -~ ~ _-+ NAHHIET AVE
J ~-~ - ~ _ -_ - ~ -_ ~ ---- -_ _ V
_ GH4ND AVE.` I
y~^r~ ~ i t ~_ t_ -_ - _ _ __ T-_
~ a ___- ~.
~i
--T- .. ~ _ -~- _. I
'~
-~
~~
i ~ -~
~ i _ ,1 ~ - ~
~~ ~ ~ -__ ~_-_ I _ J _ _-. __1____-~ - --~_ __' J
m 1 ~~
~[ ~ SYDNV .Y E. ~ ~' c
_- o ; i r-- -- i . - ~----.~ __ _ - r-~ ~ - ~
v < c _. ~_. _. , _., S I~~
_J >m z 1 1 wE,rwo~rw . c ~. •J._ ~ <
ao _
o ~
n
~~~ 1 1 ~--- - ~ I ~~ iii
O aO ~ ~_-. -~1 .. _. Ai-5 6L_ Av C. I I
I ~ ~'
OLL[L E '
~ ,---- - - .E_.._.._.~ ~.._.._~ . - - -- -- _ _ ~ ~Iy
.. ..[
'! L.~ s, ~ - ';' LYNDAL~ / a-!UB / RlIC~ILLET-~-~
_, ~ ~ o ~ ; c~~nr~~~caA~. ~MP~OVEMEtVT
l~ ~ ~ ~~P~~C~F~AI~6i RtC}-tFIELC~, MN~
i
ATTACHi~1ENT A
ANNUAL
HOUSING MANAGEMENT PROFORMA
6633 LAKE SHORE DRIVE
INCOME
Approx. 483 x 12 months $5,796.00
Taxes 1,186.00
INSURANCE 600.00
ADVERTISING -0-
MAINTENANCE 1,200.00
VACANCY FACTOR 483.00
ADMINISTRATION 300.00
TOTAL EXPENSES $3,769.00
BALANCE X2,027.00
HRA RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSAT~.ON,
AUTHORIZING PURCHASE AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
is carrying out a Community Development Block Grant project to
provide housing for low-income families, known as Property Acquisition
for Assisted Family Housing, Project 22, Site Acquisition Fund,
which includes the acquisition for real property, and
WHEREAS, the acquisition of the real property known as Lot 17,
Block 3, Fairwood .Shores Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota,. (.6633
Lake Shore Drive) would further the implementation of this program,
and
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.411, et. seq., to purchase real property, and
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized to transfer monies as necessary
to fund the purchase of this property, and
WHEREAS,
to be made by
appraisers to
WHEREAS,
reports, made
a written rep
and
the HRA has caused. appraisals of the subject property
qualified independent professional real estate
determine its fair market value, and
a qualified appraiser has reviewed the appraisal
an on-site inspection of the property and has prepared
ort setting forth his opinion as to fair market value,
WHEREAS, the appraisal work has been performed in a competent
manner in accordance with applicable State law, the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, and Department of
Housing and Urban. Development policies and requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RICHFIELD HOUSING-AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
1. That the transfer do funds from the HRA General Funds to the
Site Acquisition Fund is hereby authorized.
2. That the fair market value of $88,000 is hereby adopted
as just compensation.
•
3. That the Executive Director and the HRA's attorney are
authorized to acquire the subject property by direct purchase or
donation for an amount not to exceed just compensation as established
herein, provided the Planning Commission finds the purchase to be
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority this 1st
day of June, 1981.
Thomas E. Harms, Chairman
ATTEST:
Michael Freeman, Secretary
,\
.~ ,~
~~
:HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Office of Executive Director
HRA Letter ` No . 1 9
Agenda June 1, 1981
.Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Commissioners
City of Richfield
Dear Commissioners:
Subject: Purchase of Clark .:Oil ..Station
220 West 66th Street
On January 19, 1981, the HRA approved modification No. 2 to
the L/H/N commercial improvement program. The modification desg-
nated the property at 220 West 66th Street for acquisition by the,.
HRA. Subsequently, the planning commission on January 27, 1981,
made a finding that the purchase of this. property would be in con-
formance with the city's comprehensive plan:
It is proposed that the HRA now authorize the purchase of
this property. Through a thorough title search,,ithas been de-
termined that the site measures; 210.95 feet along 66th Street, and
107 feet of depth or 22,57.1. square feet. .The site has qualities
which make it desirable for redevelopment`. If the HRA does not -
pursue a purchase., development detrimental to the .goals and_object-
ives of the L/H/N could take place on:the site.
Monies to purchase this property are avail-able from the L/H/N
Capital Fund. A loan bearing interest at the rate'of 9 percent
per .annum could be made from this fund to the HRA.to-finance this
purchase. O.J. Jansk and Associates valued the property at
$14D,000 in December, 198Q. Vern Anderson, city assessor, valued-
it at $135,000, Mr. Hennessey, our review appraiser, recommended
u a valuation of $1,40,000. Init-ally.; Clarlc was asking $22.5,000
for the property. They have recently indicated that; $180,000
- may be acceptable_to them.r The HRA would incur holdngcosts:'on`-
this parcel until, it is ..sold to a.developer. Taxes approximate
$4,800 per year, interest at 9 percent, per annum would approximate
$16,200, and insurance would approximate $175. Total annual hold-
ing costs the, would be approximately $21,175. However, it is
anticipated that the HRA will owri this parcel for•less-.than a. year.,
.and thus holding-<costs-.would not..be substantial.;
Attached is a.resoluton.-for the consideraton..of the:: HRA. If
adopted,'t would authorize purchase of tYais property at $180,000
to be financed with a` loan `from the" L/H/N capital fund. If a'
negotiated agreement cannot be made with Clark., the Executive
EMERSON AVE.
``.~C .
i ~'~I
,~
\~ ~
_.. ~ .~ .. Nfaoff ~.f~.E _ ~ :. ~ ..
.
~\ ~ \
\\
,~~y LYNWOOO
,. .BIVp~ ~
.~ ` ~
.
i
~
DUPONT AVE
o.
P `
; I
- ~ \ I
\
1\ ~~' m Y _ Ty \
\
~ \
\
.:
..~
~
I \ - ~
\
~
v , _.. ~ /
-_ r
, COLEA. AVE... - ._.. ,~, , I ~ I
~
\ ~
~ ..
~~ v ~ i I
\r
~ ~ r ~
O
n
0
•z
D
0
v
\ `~ ~ )~ E - `f1 RRYANT AVE I
--- .~. ~r~- ~ ~v ~
J!1 r
.~ ~~; \ `,, ~. y \' j ~ I ~~ ALDRICx AVE '
V~~ I L!
~~~ ~~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I
J~ ~ I ' Tom' `/ ~ ~~, /~; ` ~'-- "~ I
P~~ 1~--- WREIE LD AVE.
7J m I'~T-~ ~ I I~N~ NARRIET AVE. `~ I
~~--rr"-- I I
1 I I _..__-i--1-_ 1-~
i
Jr ~ i ~; I i i j i I i~ L-; I I i ~ I ~-.
I I JRAND AVE
l i I ~_~ '--.TT i I I f j I
I~~ ~ to _, i
I I I ~ ~ I I
' ~ I ' I
~ L-_; L~_L..~
PLEASANT AVE.
j ' ~J ~ ~1 I ~ ~~ ~ PILLSBURY AVE.
N I-' ~ ' E I I S!
- _ WENT WORTN 4V E. --Y
N ~ ' ', -
m ~
h. N. i ~ - • --- - _ . ._ _ _ .-.-~...~_
rn ~ ~ ~ ii
BLAISDELL AVE.
~. r-. _~ ~ - __'" ~~ ~. --_ _.-_-; 1 ~ Ill
I ft ~ ~ ~
NICULLET AVE.
_ N~IE~~
.____...... ~~4~/f~l.~ffffa•N~N~Nfa•Ef~~ .. _ _. ~\ ~ \
STE VCNS AVE
~.
HRA RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CLARK
OIL STATION, 220 WEST 66TH STREET
AND PROVIDING FOR THE PURCHASE THEREOF
WHEREAS, The Richfield Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) desires
to purchase certain real property pursuant to and in furtherance of the L/H/N
Redevelopment Project heretofore adopted by the City of Richfield and the HRA,
said real property being described as in attachment A and also known as 220 West
66th Street Site, and
WHEREAS, it appears necessary and desirable to redevelop the Site in
accordance with the redevelopment standards .and guidelines for the LHN area, and
WHEREAS, the owners of the Site, Clark-Oil and Refining have not heretofore
indicated a willingness to develop or redevelop the Site in accordance with the
plans and programs. applicable to the LHN area, and
WHEREAS, the plans and programs for the LHN area .cannot be fully achieved
and realized without the redevelopment of the Site, and
WHEREAS, the HRA has caused appraisals of the subject property to be made
and has carefully considered such appraisals, and
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445 to
purchase real property, and
WHEREAS, the LHN Capital Improvement Fund has sufficient monies to provide
for the purchase, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission in Resolution No. 26 adopted. January 27,
1981, found that the purchase and disposition of the site for commercial or office
use was in conformance with the comprehensive plan.
' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RICHFIELD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY:
1. The .owners are hereby requested and directed to sell and transfer the
Site to the HRA which will inturn sell and transfer the Site to some other party
who will promptly take measures to redevelop the Site in accordance with such
plans, programs and guidelines.
2. In the event that the. owners of the Site have failed to take action
under the foregoing Paragraph 1 within 90 days of the date hereof, the Executive
Director is hereby authorized and directed to institute eminent domain proceedings
for the acquisition of the Site for the purposes of accomplishing the re-
development of the Site in accordance with the plans, programs and guidelines
applicable to the LHN Area.
3. That $180,000 is determined to be just. compensation for the
subject real property.
4. The monies to purchase the property shall be borrowed from the LHN
Capital Improvement Fund at the rate of 9% per annum.
5. The Executive Director is directed and authorized to execute a
purchase agreement for the amount of just compensation as indicated above.
Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Richfield the 1st day of June, 1981..
Thomas E. Harms, Chairman
ATTEST:
Michael Freeman, Secretary
Attachment A
Clark 0i1 & Refining Property
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Property situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota:
The Easterly 240.95 feet, as measured. at .right angles, of
the Southerly 150.00 feet, as measured at right angles of the
following described property:
That part of the South 53 1/3 rods of the Southeast Quarter
of .the Northwest Quarter of Section. 27, Township 28, Range 24,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing.
at a point on the South line of the above described tract
which is 25 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence
North parallel with the West line of the above described tract
660 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said
tract 303.7 feet; thence South 660 feet to a point in the
South line of said tract, which is 302.9 feet East of the
point of beginning.
Subject to the following:
Easements for roadway purposes over the East 30 feet of the above
described parcel and over the South 43 feet of the above described
parcel running in favor: of the City of Richfield.
~ \ -
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT. AUTHORITY
Office of Executive_Director
HRA Letter.No. 18
Agenda June 1 ,~ 1981
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority ,Commissioners .
City. of Richfield
,.Dear Commissioners:
• Subject: Vacation of Aldrich Avenue
On Friday, May 29, 1981,-the HRA became the owner of the .
Adams''property. Most of this property is_to be resold to the
Lyndale Fruit and Vegetable Market,~alang".with a portion of
Aldrich. Avenue which is to be vacated.: The vacation, plus owner-
snip of the Adams. property, will permit the HRA to sell the land
to Zyndale Fruit and Vegetable ,Market, Inc. for _'the installation.
of their parking: lot in accordance with the developer's agreement
.previously-approved by the HRA".
Under terms of ,the developer's agreement, Lyndale Market has
agreed to pay for the installation of anew cul-de-sac within.
.existing city r.~ght-of-way to the.. north of the area to be vacated.
It is.recommended that the 'HRA adopt the. attached resolution,.
authorizing the-Chairman and the. Executive Director to petition
the city. for the ;vacation of Aldrich Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ s~. ~i~ C~,~,.~~.
~`
Karl Nollenberger
Executive Director
KN/eja
cc: Community .Development .Director
Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator
- City Engineer
HRA RESOLUTION N0.
. RESOLUTION PETITIONING
THE CITY COUNCIL TO
VACATE A PORTION OF
ALDRICH AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(HRA) is administering the L/H/N Redevelopment Project heretofore
adopted by the HRA and the City of Richfield (the "City"), -and
WHEREAS, the HRA entered into a Contract for Private Development
(agreement) with the Lyndale Fruit and Vegetable Market, Inc. (Developer;
dated March 18, 1981, in furtherance of the objectives of the project,
and goals and
WHEREAS, the Agreement calls for the construction of improvements
in the area now occupied by Aldrich Avenue South, and
WHEREAS, the HRA is the. owner of property on both sides of
Aldrich Avenue including the cul-de-sac which property is required
by the Developer for the construction of improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Agreement requires the Developer to pay for the
installation of a new cul-de-sac north of the area to be vacated,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RICHFIELD HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
1. The Chairman and Executive Director are authorized to sign a
petition for the vacation of that portion of Aldrich Avenue South
lying south of the following described line:
The north line of Lot 1, Block 2, C. B. Adam's addition
as extended to its intersection with the [3est right-of-way
line of Aldrich Avenue.
2. The Executive Director is directed to present the petition
to the City Council for their action.
Passed by the Housing and. Redevelopment Authority of Richfield
this 1st day of June, 1981.
Thomas E. Harms, Chairman
ATTEST:
Michael Freeman, Secretary
•
• ~i
:~. _' ~
y '
~~` •~ ~ /~
T N :.~ \ '
~ _. €€ .• ~
+ ~ •i- ~ i•
~';~
~"~
~, 1. :~r~~.
I i ~ _
_, ~:~
:
.:
I. - _ ;~
:
-
_ .
~ ~ N ~ -
I
~ ^
~~ i~ ~ IF
I I F 3 ~ i ' ~ ~ i ~~
,_ (~ ~s i I
,
`
~
I t ~ I
~ ~7 L-
' i ~~__
i '~
I ~
~, F ~ ~ E . I ~ ,t
~. ~
_~
\, .
'•, ,. ~ .;
~ iii R ~~ o. ~ _ ^;I....,
, •. •~i t ~`t s.
~` I
, \ 6 h.R 1~ '
N ~.
,\ ~` '
4: ~ ~
~1 4b ~ =-
e _ ij ~
°~ -, 3 .c
C ~ ~^ -
~ - r ~ u'
~ ~ ~~ r
e .x ••~ , ,
is .. r: i. ,~
..~ ~ ~' ; ,
~~ '
.;f:
=..~
Jt.
~~ Ec 4 •.
I
M
• r:
.....<
b
O
n
rt
r•
0
0
M
N
a
n
w
x
9
C
C-h
0
K
m
F-'
O
n
w
r7
tD
a
___~
~~~. ~%. -
_ ~l
-t
~.-~ ,~;
_i
' Gl~. ~ ~ ' ~ •
'
i t .
i. ~ >
., r ~ _
; ~~r~ ~ ~ ~ N 1
S i Or
'
L I.~ .~ f ~ i A< '
1 ~ .
-1 ~
~ ~i1 . •t.'
I 6'
,, -.
~_ `:
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Office of Executive Director
HRA Letter No. 17
Agenda June 1 , 1.981
Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Commissioners
City` of Richfield
Dear Commissioners:
'`Subject: Cedar Avenue,Redevelopment Potential
_ A few weeks ago, HRA cammissionsrs received a copy which
examined :'several issues related to the redevelopment potential
~of the-area adjacent to the 66th Street and Cedar Avenue.: inter-
section. That report was prep'"ared by the Technical Advisory
Research Service of the League: of Minnesota Cities (TARS)..
The TARS report discusses the redevelopment potential of:;the
• Cedar Avenue Liquor Store site. However, it also addresses `a
strategy for using development of"the liquor store site as a
lever for funding renewal activities in the area north of 66th
Street on Cedar Avenue.
On July 21, 198.0, the HRA discussed goals for 1980-81. At
that time, it was-suggested that the area of 66th Street and Cedar
Avenue, especa.ally the 'mixed land use area to-the north, should
be `studied fore. possible renewal activities. :The TARS report
suggests alternatives to achieve this goal.
The report will be presented for discussion at the June ,1,
1981: HRA meeting. The LMC personnel that worked on this report
will be present at that meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
Executive-Drector:
KN/eja
cc: Communty_Development Director
Housng,and Redevelopment Coordinator
•
~~
•
~~ ~~
v~
SUNIlKARY OF MAJOR POINTS
1. The platted lots and adjacent streets and alleys .would be
defined as the "Main Tract". The point of land along 66th
Street on the west end of the -site consisting of a vacated
section of Lakeshore Drive and property lying west of
Lakeshore Drive would be designated as the "West Tract".
The Lynch, Shefcik and Davis properties would be-3esig aced
as the "South Tracts" .
2. The Main Tract would be sold to developer for $263,000.00.
X106 _0~ o~_this~aould be in cash__on._the __d_at~ t e ~ronerty ~~
is sold to the developer. The remaining balance will be ~
paid by the developer to the HRA in equal installments as ~~
each of the units is sold.
3. Closinct on the Main Tract would be set for October 30, 1981.
provided that HRA can establish marketable title on or prior
to that date. If marketable title cannot be established,
HRA would not be required to proceed with the sale but buyer
could waive any title defects and proceed with the purchase..
4. The sale of the West Tract would_._oc_cu~onl~_in the _etient
that the-sale of the Main Tract is accomplished. The time
of closing on the West Tract, however, would be deferred
until HRA can make good title to the West Tract. If HRA is
unable to do this, there would be no purchase and sale of
the West Tract. The failure of the parties to complete this
transaction would not affect developer's right to proceed
with its project. The developer's cost in purchasing the
West Tract would be equal to the HRA's costs in acquiring
the property from the county.
5.
The acquisition of the South Tra~t~_ wol?~ d be solely de en-
dent upon the cit_~s -ability to buy fem. I f the property
located at 6617 Lake Shore.Drive is purchased by HRA or the
city before u~ne -l, 1982, it would then be purchased by
developer. If the tract located at 6617 Lake Shore Drive is
acquired in this fashion and if the city or HRA have
acquired the tract located at 6633 Lake Shore Drive by that
date, the developer would also e o iga a o-acquire that
tract. The purchase price of these parcels would be the
value of each as raw land. The agreed upon value of each
parcel on such condition is $8,200. --
~ s~-~~~ .
Any of the South Tracts which are acquired by the Developer
would be integrated into the project site in a manner
approved by the HRA; and could not be resold or used for any
other purposes unless approved by the City and HRA.
• 6. The roject would consist of a minimum of 177 units as des-
cribed in e p ans and materials submitted to and approved
by the HRA. These preliminary plans and .other items of
• information would become part of the development agreement.
° ~'~ The develope would agree that the improvements. to the pro-
ject site would have a project cost of at least $12,000 OoQ..
The development agreement would include a guarantee of the
nticipated tax increment from a ro'ect h`ving a minimum
mare va ue o a amoun less costs not attributable to
the improvements or land. The guarantee would be for a tax
increment amount of so many dollars per year for a specified
number of years, and would guarantee that minimum market
value beginning December 31, 1982.
7. Easements would be retained for the following:
•
8.
9.
•
(a) The right of way necessary for the widening of 66th
Stree .
(b) The location of utilities which are in .place i~resent
La es ore rive. (This would be part of the sale of
the West Tract.)
(c) The city's water line which crosses the project site.
Th cos ti~g-hie--water line would be the
H ~_ - ~ y s cost. An appropriate time during.
construction would have to be established for the
relocation of the water line on the project site.
(d) An easement approximately 14 feet in width alongside
the Velasquez lot, i'~i`-£`is a ermine y e c hat
a ey is necessary in order to provide access and
utility service to the houses on Lakeshore Drive which
are not sold to developer. (If this alley is not
needed, the city would relinquish the easement without
cost to developer.) Alternatively, if the city deter-
mines that access to such residence can best be
maintained by the construction of a cul de sac on the
existing alley, the city may do this. In such event,
the developer would provide the city with an easement
for the cul de sac.
Any demolition which remains to be done after closing,. and
t_ o i ion, would be-t~ responsibility of
the developer. If-the HRA does no building removal or
demolition prior to closing, all demolition would be done by
developer. The HRA would have the right to remove any of
the structures prior to closing.
Developer's
show access
with
1c1i15 cli1C1 SjJCC:1I1C:c11,1V115 t1 l.l.ciC:i1CC1 l.V 1,11C UCVC1-
i en i ied t erein. This design would
from the project site onto Lakeshore Drive.
-2-
10. The HR.A would. convey the property free of existing and
n
_)
men i specia asse~snrents: ----- __-___--------__.W._._..___.~.___~.~_ - ----
11. The city or HRA would bear the costs of relocating city-
owned utilities, i. e. sewer, water and storm sewer facil-
ities, to accommodate the project.
12. All electric facilities on the project's site would be
undergrounded and landscaping and other improvements on the
project site would be in accordance with plans attached to
the agreement or identified therein. The landscaping plans
would include a 6 foot screening fence on the project site
boundary adjacent to any single family residence not owned
by .the city or HRA. However, this requirement could be
fulfilled through the use of other landscaping design. fea-
tures which would provide suitable screening.
13. If the purchase of the Main Tract occurs but the developer
fails to proceed with the development, the property will
revert to the HRA. If the developer has demolished struc-
tures at the time of such failure, it shall pay to the HRA
$150,000 as liquidated damages to provide partial compensa-
tion for the HHA's loss of value of the structures. Payment
of liquidated damages will be secured by having the devel-
oper provide an irrevocable letter of credit to the HRA for
the amount of the liquidated damages. The security for the
liquidated damages would be refunded after the developer has
constructed the building to a point above the foundation
level.
14. Ad valorem taxes payable in the year of closing would be
prorated between buyer and seller as of the date of closing.
Taxes payable in later years would be the responsibility of
developer.
15. The development agreement would recite that the project will
be qualified by the developer for FHA's Section 234 (c)
guaranteed loan program. The agreement would provide also
that the condominium documents would have to be submitted to
the HRA and the city for. approval and would include such
provisions as are necessary to provide assurance that the
original purchasers of condominium units will be persons of
5~ ~ years of age or older on the date of purchase. To the
extent possible, he project shall likewise limit the age. of
the occupantsn ton ye rs, or 1Lol er. ~~ ~ ~ ~ Up
to ~¢ Q'7c ~ ~-i.QN~v , E(i ~ C CY n9~ ~ c.Q~...~j -~
16. At least 10 days before the date of closing, the developer
should provide HRA with satisfactory evidence that construc-
tion financing for the project has been obtained and that
long-term mortgage financing for condominium purchasers has
been arranged.
17. It is anticipated that special problems involving soil
correction exist on the main site. Those problems may
-3-
~~~
require substantial investment in order to ready the site
.for construction. The HRA agrees that it will reduce the
purchase price of the main tract by ~8'/ of the cost of an
approved method of soil correction. The HRA may disapprove
any method when it appears to its satisfaction that there is
a less expensive alternative available. which conforms to
sound engineering practice and is substantially as likely as
the proposed method to correct the soils. to a point adequate
for the project. In such event, the HRA shall pay ~8'~ of
the estimated cost of the alternative. The developer may,
however, elect to proceed with the proposed .method. The
HRA's participation shall not exceed $157,000. All payments
under this section shall reduce the amounts payable upon the
closing of the individual units.
18. The developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the HRA and
the city from any claim involving .property damage or
personal injury caused by soil correction activities.
The developer and all appropriate contractors and subcon-
tractors shall carry insurance insuring against the risks of
such activity.. The insurance shall be subject to approval
by the city and HRA.
r:
s~~ °
-4-
~ ~ `.~
) _
,.
,.~ ~
r.. .
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT .AUTHORITY ''
Office of Executive Director-
16
c
HRA Lett
r No.
Agenda June 1,..1981
1. ~
Housing and Redevelopment-
Authority Commissioners
City <`of Richfield
Dear Commissioners:
_,
Subject: Selection of a Developer for L/H/N ~ -
_Multi-Family Site
At the Niay 18 ~ .19$1 HRA. meeting,, the HRA heard 'two proposals-
for development of the site designated::for development of multi-
famly::housing (southeast corner 'of 66th S reet/Lake Shore Drive
:
`intersection). Thee Knutson Companies had originally proposed to
develop a cooperative housing project for :people 60 years of age
and older. In December, 1980, Cgngress modified the rules for -
the financing which had been contemplated-for .this development,
and .the project became impractical..- Because of Knutson's,contnued
' in Brest in the:'ste,,:ahey have now presented a proposal to con-
; struct 168 condominium units, to be marketed to generally the same
~ age group as the coop. Constr:uctan would begin in the fall of
1981. .
A second proposal for development of the site was presented by "
McKinley-Brustad. They .contemplate-construction of: 198 units of
rental housing to: begin in. the spring of 1982. '
It is my recommendation that the HRA select the proposal made
by the Knutson Companies because it best meets the needs of the
community at this time, which is to provide .alternative housing. <-
ownership options for. the .city's senior citizens. However, this
recommendat-ion is based on successfully concluding negotiations
on a developer `.s agreement. The major points on which agreement
must be reached are the sale price. of the'land and the method of
payment, date. of closing. and 'construe ion start, number of units::
and height'of building, liquidated damages•to the HRA if the pro-
ject fails prior to construction, and a tax increment guarantee..
rAt the June 1,'-19.81 meeting,. the HRA .will be presented with a
developer's agreement which addresses the major points identified,
above. It is-recommended that the HRA authorize the Chairman
`and Executive Director of the HRA to enter into the agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenbe ger
Executive Director..:...
cc: ;Community Dev. Dir.
Housing & Redevelopment Coor.
HOUSING AND.. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Office of- Executive Director
_HRA-Letter'No. 15
- Agenda..:-June 1, 1981
Housing. and Redevelopment
Authority Commissioners
City of Richfield
Dear Commissioners
Subject:- Donation, of Easement Areas To the City
for' CP 705-3, 66th Street`Improvement Project
The HRA has previously been informed of the improvemen
;project planned for 6th' Street be ween Lyndale Avenue and I-35W.
-This project is a point undertaking by the City and Hennepin
County,- and Progressive Contractors, Inc._(PCI) will be doing
the actual construction work-'on the: project:. Construction is
expected:. to start in June..
The HRA owns two properties which will be affected by this
project, at 6600 Graham Avenue and 821 West 66th Street_ Both
of these properties `are within the site designated fore multi-
family housing-development. To permit installation of the
street improvements in this area, an .easement across, these. two;
parcels is necessary {see attached .map), Because of the curve
in the right-of-way, the: easements' vary in-..depth.. At Grah'am' '
Avenue, the depth is.approxmately 15 feet:; it tapers to about
five feat near the alley:and widens to: about eight feet'at Lake
Shore Drive. The .two prospective developers for the mult-
famly site-have.,mad,e accomodations for. these easements in their .
site plans .'
_It is recommended that the. HRA adopt the attached resolutions,
authorizing he Chairman and Executive Director to execute
easement agreements donating the hand to the-city, which is _ ''
necessary to complete the 66th Street improvement project.
Res1pectfully submitted,
r ~
~-<~...Sc. n~ ~-Cz.,.~~
Karl Nollenberger
City' Manager
_cc:: Community Development Director `
City Engineer
~'
,:
f ~, -,-,_ _ ---. _ .__-- _ _ _.~ __.- _ CROSSTOWN HYW.
,.
_.
{- _~ -- - ---- --J ~._ -- _----- __~ _
'~ ~ ~ -- -
- -- ~ 1~-= --- -- - - __- _ -
"
,~
_ .. ~ ~ _ -- --I --- - --- -- ~ ---I
-r f
L ~..
~ f
i
t .. `..__"__ .__ WI _ __
~ ~ F- .. ~ I
---
' ~ _ ' L ---- - -- - -- ~ - - - _ _ --- - --
.- ~ -._~ ar -~~~ _l a~.. .. _i _ >_ -- --' v f 63 rd 5T.
.._-,~ ~ f
__. _ 1 ~ ~
I -) I •~ j a ~ I~ ~ ~ I
_.,
r
I ~ ,> I I c i ~ i - - W - -- - -
._
~ a~-- ' I ~ tc~ t ~ I L ~u~ i mL 1r ~ 'a! --i oil _i
/ A.. .:_y1 L __~r I~ R\VE --\ I I I i j j I_ F - Q I F -... t _.. _. > ~
/ i - -, m O - ii7t~ll Ott I F. F
. f'- -~~~°/ ~ ~ as ~'ai 35 , I ~ I-__..~ ~r - _!----- -- N
~, I W,. R I C H F I E L D ~ °` ~ a6 I 1~ fl ,. I< J 1 r ~- 1 f--- i W
6
~N~tt11~t18iii1 t1~It~ ~ t2 `, ~tt`af~ i l_ _.._~-..1 __ .L 1__~ ~_
~~
- - , i r I ~ _ r _.-~ , , ~..
I
. f fit •A ~~ ' ~ ~ ~
~t. ~~~~ ~ . 1~~ ;s LAKE l o ,5 ~,~ '•.~i ~ ~ -~--- -~ - -~- -, -
---~ ~ ~
j_~.~ y~. ~ 14 ~j ~~ ~ I I
i q
t i,aa,i , / ~ '
~~ t3 18 ~1~ ~R~1711>tiil®IlC7
~'~s. e me ~ ` b°~ ~ '
I ~ I ~ / ao ~ ~s ~ i ~a i » ,
l ; i.__.~ ~ - ~ - --J
'• ~ - ~ - - -
• --~ t7 65 th S-L~ ~ f
I ~ J` \ is 1 ~ 37 i I 4g
' j _
~ _ % I ~ 36 j 45
_i .
a ` ,
I ~ ~, - -_i _ ~ t ~`%~ 2 ~"~. ? 21 ~ 20 t "'^A,-r 35 I
a
I _ __
L
I „ ~
n ~ ~ ?3
I Ir - ~ ~ I ••~260~~.. / 5 -~ ~~ ~ {26 J!~ ~a ~ 32 -~ ~ --- ~ ~-
i ~ ~ <... ;._ ~. ~ ~ 6 241 25 Iyr- - -, „~ ----I F----~ ~ ~.
V ~ __~ L_. ~ ~ I i • f , ~ I i I . L L I_ ~ ._ ~ 3J L _ ~_J L
I .,._~ ;i I ~ ~ _ _
~ I i~.. .. .~ I ~_-.. _I~I L l I ~7- / / / /\~L ~Q` ~ ~ 9 1 ~ - ~~I()4} ~! 106 i /114,113166 rib 1T3Q--i/Irtt~if~llt~t~.
I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ __ , c ~~ ,~ _ tt2 ~ ,zs ~ I
j _' / ~ f 1 `i \ 'B.' ,9s4 i `- .._ i .`II'I
~ ~ / ~~ !,'/ ,,, !1 aol 0 ~ J / tII~ ~ tz~ , I
I I .._ ~ ~ ~. i ~/ ~ ~~ , s ~^ ~ fU3 J I i,i l l tz6 , ~ ~
1 I ~ ~. {~ m' / ~' ~ ~ ~ `. ~ ~ I I: ins ~ I
. 1l ._.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i. ~:, ~ ~ ~ .,(1 .~. f Ito ' I 71' F 123 ~ r ----I __,
~ - ~ f r
-'
,~ I ~ Y' 3 ,' - 120 ~~Uttt~1{t~i~tl01~i1~ -t
I • I ~ ~ J 1, _ - - ,S'~qF ' % ~ «I`f - • / . _
i ~ . i WOOD ~~ \ ~ - ~ ~ 4 ! -
1
~~ ~ i'
is _ ~' LAKE I ~_ _ ~ J '~'~ ~- ~~~ J C ~ _ ~.
~- 68 tb ~ ST.
Resolution No.
RESOLUTION. DEDICATING PUBLIC
PROPERTY TO THE 66th STREET
IMPROVEI~NT P~JEGT ,
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Miruzesota, has undertaken a program
of public improvements within the Lyndale-Hub Nicollet C~unercial Improvement
Project area; and,
WHEREAS, such public .improvements include the construction of sidewalk,
street and landscape areas, such improvements being for public purpose; and,
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield Minnesota
owns property adjacent to 66th Street within the area to be improved such
property legally described as:
Description of Parcel:
Lot 11, Block 3, and
That part of the adjoining vacated South 20 feet of W. 66th Street
lying between the extensions across it of the East and West lines
of said Lot 11,
Block 3, Faizwood Shores, according. to the plat thereof on file or
of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for
said County.
.Description of Easement:
That part of the south 20 feet of vacated West 66th Street as
dedicated in FAIRWOOD SHORES, according to the recorded plat
thereof, lying westerly of the easterly line and. its northerly
continuation of Lot 11, Block 3, FAIRWOOD SHORES: lying easterly
of the northerly continuation of the westerly line of said Lot
11; and lying northerly of a line parallel and/or concentric with
and 50.00 feet southerly of Line A, hereinafter described:
Line A:
Commencing at the northwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 27, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota;
thence on an assumed bearing of East, 475.00 feet along the
north line of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 20 degrees 48
minutes 35 seconds West, 6.00 feet; thence South 88 degrees 51
minutes 44 seconds West, 462.23 feet on a tangential curve,
concave to the south, central angle 22 degrees 38 minutes 14
seconds and radius 572.96 feet; thence South 66 degrees 13
minutes 30 seconds West, 133.72 feet, tangent to said curve;
thence westerly 429.11 feet on a tangential curve., concave to the
north, central angle 42 degrees 54 minutes 40 seconds, and radius
572..96 feet and there tezmuzating.
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Housing and Redevelognent
Authority of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Chairman and Executive Director are directed to execute a
perpetual easement for the area to be improved..
2. The HRA Attorney is directed to record the perpetual easement
against the property.
Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Richfield
this 1st day of June, 1981.
ATTEST:.
Thomas E. Hams, irnian
Nii. el .Freeman, Secretary
i