07-28-80 agenda
~- /U
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Off ice of City Manager
Council Letter No. 271
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject:
On July 14, 1980
Resolution Receiving Special Assessment
Roll and Calling for Public Hearing, C.P. 705
council directed the city clerk to
City Project 705, the street im-
vious commitments. The developer's agreements for Coach Homes and
K-Mart specified amounts to be assessed; $151,476..52 and $206,346.50,
respectively. The remaining amount of the special assessments is to
be assessed to each parcel, according to area, at $.502 per square
foot.
The assessment roll will be on file in the clerk's office for
public inspection. The special assessment hearing is suggested to
be scheduled for August 25, 1980.
Spec if ically,.~
cedure.
The staff recommends that the city council pass the attached
resolution which:
-Receives the assessment roll and places it on file with
the city clerk;
-Sets August 25, 1980 as the date for the public hearing;
-Directs the clerk to place a notice of the hearings in the
official newspaper according to law.
Respectfully submitted,
~o
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ ej a
cc: City Attorney
Community Development Director
Administrative Services Director
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
ROLL AND CALLING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
FOR LHN STREET IMPROVEMENT
CITY PROJECT N0. 705
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 6260 passed by the City Council
on the 23rd day of June, 1980, the city clerk was directed to
prepare a proposed assessment roll of the cost of the LHN street
improvement, City~Project No. 705,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The council receives the proposed assessment roll as
prepared by the city clerk, and directs the city clerk
to file the assessment roll in her office for public
inspection.
2. A public hearing shall be held on August 25, 1980 in
the council chambers of the Richfield City Hall at 7:00
P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such
time and place all persons- owning property affected by
such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard
with reference to such assessment.
The following area is proposed to be assessed for permanent
street improvements:
That area bounded on the north by 64th Street, on the
east by First Avenue, on the west by Emerson Avenue and
on the south by 67th Street.
3. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of
the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published
in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing and she shall state in the notice the
total assessed cost of the improvement in the amount
of $1,900,000. She shall also cause mailed notices to
be given to the owner of each parcel described on the
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the
hearing .
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 28th day of July, 1980.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sy via K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
~ :'? ~
_~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~
^ _
• I
I
I
I
i 1
.
i ~
'
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 1
i
I
j
I
~
j I
~
~
,
~ '
{
~ '
~
j I
I
1
~,.
i ~
~
'
~'
q
Ol
I
rl
j
M
i
M
lD
C1 I
i ~ I ! M N j ~ ~ i ~ M ! O q u1
` I H i i i
! q I h i M 1D N q ~.
i j ~ j ~ N O q i 01 i t0 N
~
Q i
O
j
q
I
h
~
r-1
i
CV
V' I
j i
i ~ I O ~O I ~ V' i ~D ~ ~V ' V' I
I i
~
1 ' ~ N I f(
I ~ ~ I
i ~ ~
j ~ I
~ I
i I ~ i
~ i I j
i i
i ,
i ~
* *
I ! _ !
* *
*
* ~ ~ ,
~
* * ~ i
..~
* x s i
# J *
4 Il
# C :v Y i ~ 1
* -_ i *
* * p; h ~ 61 O l0 M ~D O~
*. J _. * 10 O ~ O~ M l0 h h
* = *. W O to ~ N V~ q
* ,c .~ * V •
* -~ * O M Ol N V' q
* * ~ V~ r-1 N M N
Y Y
• Y
Y f^ Y
Y [~ :f • ~ }
Y n _ tr # ~ i 1
# - 1c '
# C # i I ' ~
# #' ~ ~
i
* ... #'
# J r- - % 1
* .~ -• * ~
# '/: ^ * ~ r
# r #
_-
J. V.i _ x
Y i
# 1 - .~ - * '
Y u .Z Y
Y G :.] ~ *
I
Y J '+ ~ Y
Y r .~ r ,:. ~ * ~
Y c ;_, _ < is ~ 1
* J # i
Y (_ • ~ • ~ ac ~
i K _ 1
t " Y *
_
*
* '._
Y 1 1 *
* G '\. ; K
# ?
Y #
Y _
# •~
Y ~ -. ._ *
{c _ •• * ~
_, - 1 _ G 1
Y .~. Y ~
* ~ ~ r~ ~ i
i - n r c .~ _ - ~ - -
Y Y ,a L Y J .i
^
_ _
I
l! 1: 1~
3
'\ L' x ~ I
\. Y\< \ C. K 7~ x 1 i y ,~
Yi a * • \ \ \ \ \ t~ .C C 1 C.i .f ~.~ 7 .L
~.- =_~ o
1 1 f 1 1 0 / 1 / 1 1 t 4 ~ ~ ,
_--
.~_ 1 •
j
~
~O
M
rl
M
V'
O
~
M
'
N
V'
O
~ l0 tT ~ N - N N r•-I ~ V' rl M
N N O h N lf1 ~ 01 M 111 N
' tt> N CO CO 61 ri N ri r-I N
O ri ~ U1 111 h CA ~ N h ~ O Ol
111 O h h ~ In (~l ~ u1 O ~ h ,
' r-1 ri rl
i
~~
i
~ i
~
_ t
f
;
~
1
. 1
l0 V' O ~ M O l7 V' l0 ~' •.
' h
h <r ri ~ ao o ~ r~ m ~
o ~o o .-i m o ~ ~ <r .i co c
rt ~ ~ 1n ~ ~r n1 rn h r
0
r-I O ll1 tC1 ~ ri h O rl ~ h Ul L
N rl .-i r-I r•I '. N N r-I ~ r
i ! i !
~
~
,
~
i
~ ~
~
i
i
~
~
~ i
i
i
,
• ' i•
_
_ J ~
_ ~ ` r
. +'I1 ~ '_ 'n N ~ 1 h
' Y i, ti n .L. Y It 'U 1 ~
`
_ > r ,1; !1 ~Y o S~ L U '.f ~n J a o - c
~
Y I 1 ~- 1 Z J -O 1 - ~ / a r 1 V 1 i ta. ~ 1 > c~ 1 'l, t 1
J'. J U C J L r .... S
• -
v; _ f 7 J t 1.C J 1 J 1 J ! - 1- 1 1 1 *- 1 1 -
J 7 ~ C
~ ~ Y 7 _
>- 7 _
^.
.. ~ - 'L J •I o f L - ~ ~ - Z' ? i
' ~ 1. U J J v ^_ J ti U J ti ,.: J ti A J 1 1• Y L J ~ L _, 'V F_ J '\
_ __
~
• Z x 7_ 1 3 .-~ 1 C a 1 -l, i. 1 O 2 1
s 1 > 1
y 1 a? ~-+ 1
j 1 '
H ;u r-. S J LL X 6 'h J L~ LL, f .aJ
1 T. ii..' a 1 1-'+ 1 LL
:/~ Y
`Y Y a U Z 1~ U '~: -.a: ,r 1j J ~ S. ti ~: O S- 1: «. C :_ > x 2 'V J 'L 2 'L. r Z. 1. Y ~ 1
1. O' 1 O ~ U Ci `^- :.~ .i. "~' Li - ~.: c (:. U; C ~-+ ~.' M U c `~' J c :L -+ U
~• i G O "" ~ If" '"+ ~ x 1; 2 '~ x s -+ a` ~ f a-! r~ a r ~-a !~ J :P+ O 4 ~ ..- ~ r ~ r .~ .O rs ~ y T 1-
+?
' ' 2 a S '1. = ,D ~ 'L• y 1 U ti LL S =. 1: n .G ~ ti Z .-• `.1"., M ~ y' +~ ~ N O Y N 3 C 1: '1. 3 .D ~X ti Y ~- :/:
_.~
.
._ O .~ ~
i
t
_ .a'„ qq
1~ M ~ M ~ r N , N - to l0 q if.
o .-a rn o co ~ r o ~ ,-~
M v~ .-~ m o ~ o~ o~ w <r
Lo ~o o rt ~r o ~n o ~ ~ ~.
N M N ~ ~ N [~ O In M r-I r-I
N
b to . Ol 7' ~M N N C> C l:
r-I ~ ~N ri ri N cM r1 r-I
M tf1
~ ~ N ~M M tl' W
Cl CO l~ O N l0 6~ O O ~ M rl
.-1 to t0 N V' tl' I1'1 q N ttl C
l0 O O t0 ~ 07 ~ O ~ (~ ~ e-i W t11 W
C~ LO ~' ' N M N M Ol In N N
l0 O ~ CO Ol CO 61 1f) V' ~ b N ~ N
~-1 M M N d' W ~ N M ~.-.{
I
f
Y Y •
U ~ y
~ - 3.
~, L .. n
n 1~nrn a,i o
.. .r v v n•r,ti
> n:
..
-
-
- ,,.
.u 'l 7 .L :J
~ t ~1 L ~L: .L > 1 .f
" r
_ _
> i 1 J Y f 1 ~ 1 ": 1 ~-- 1 L Y !'~ 1 .= a x 1 a z' 1 1 i r
r M . ~
i ti y.
n
~ i ^' J ~. 1~ H J t. l ~ r~ 1 6 7 'V v ~ r x ". r J -_ v '. _' ,;_ 'L
_
a_ -- • - a r ._~ -~ 1 .x a 1 - r. r s .n i a _%+ 1 r 1 - 1 i ~- r
_
- "\: F _ J R. J S 1
~ i r ,il ..J > .a3 W Y :u 7 - t
~ '. Y
~
~ U
1 _
t o ,_
f t a
- 1 H
J 1 J
r 1 :x S_S t :J .z 1 U g 1 y, T «- 1 .
-
r '~ .-.
Y r_ w ~ '^ _ r J
W '. C
y T .^_ ," ~ :..2 S :L y Y
.l L '.7 +.
_ Z 7 N ~ +l. Y _ ti C nr ^_ '1 r, ti = rte. ~- ~ N ti ... r. •.J ~.. V> 1 .-, fr
T J ~ ~-' J '-~ 2~ U O r- J .-. U C 7 ~1. J C~ C J O C C C ~.. Ly - Y 'L L> .. n, L
iJ C J
' ^ Tom.. r G r -~ ~ ^ ~ M > Q H 1~ ~ ~ a. a a. ,~ - ~ a J J:... :!' •. ^ e~ .-~ n
-.
: _ ti a .C z N ~' .O X 'L O .C Y ti J S x ti T .D T: ti .a: r', c cC v', ~' '~; W t r: n. ,r J) Y ~~ ., U o 'Y; 2
_.
___1 `,
u-,
t`
In
~
~
_ o
in
vi .
~
In
~-i 01 (~ O Ol Lff cr Ol l0 ~ q c
r ~n ~ m ~n ~ M ~ rn u1 v
' r-i N n M In d' '--I l~ ~O V' 1,
' N Gl O ri lf1 M l0 N N N M
' rl l~ ~M 61 N lp ~ N O - [~ ~p r:
N N ~ N - O l0 cN
N
. ~~~~ ~
~.
O
Si
M M Q,' O~ ~ [~ - O M
N C O O O ~ Ol dl d' 01 O
~
~
~
~ N
to
~
.. ~ N N O Yi N M 07 ~ cr O
N t0 r• N O~ ~ t` N ~P 'V' (~
N to N CO d' O V' O d' N l0
cT to rl tl" .--I N N _ rl ~ rl
N ri
!
I~ ~ ~ A 1
'
;I
..
ii ~ ~ w ' ~
I
it
'~~
II
.I
l ~
~
~
~ 1 i
~
i
11
F~
~I - r
J ~G C '..
I `.1 .1 W C O f'
~
r. r '~ ~ d
~. 2 .l~ '~ '_ C ~-+ > > _n <; = } ;rt C .~: ',J'1 G 3' > 7 C _. C J _
1 1 :.J C t ~ Z ! a sz 1 ~ t x 1 1 1 1 t
J
a ;/: 1, n J- J ti 'c J r„ .,7 J n: ~: S ,3 'L /? R r- ~ c n J Z
. ~,.7 < ~- t l~ a f - J .-r 1 c J ^-' 1 r J '-+ t .: 1 1 '. .- 1 Z
< 1 ~< _.. ~ t t !
'.> .a
` =' 2 J x li Y LL. 'y i S rt; ~ r Y 2 ~ r Y
Y.:f' S 1. ~- N ^ti a Y. S 2 ^. .G i ... O S 1 > O 2 n: T O >- f~ r :.f> 1'. :f? t 1' J ti d '~ _: 1: d
' T ^
'J C J: ~- J C "~ '• v '~' U G '^ ~ H C s- ~ l.+ ~ ~ G7 O Y ? J C .:; O J C "L ~/` ~ Y ~/` °
r
~
I: d •~ s a •~ a s .-~ ~ ~ ~-. n o a ... .. a ... r. ~ c n• 2 .~ :. r^ ~ < a c ~ a s
J c :L
~ '1. :^ - ~ ^~. .^. .O x t Z .D .~ 'L z ~ z, ^.~ U S> x N J rr. r. N Z N ~; ti a eD ~~ v U .•• :~.: n U ~• Z ni
.
i o - - __ -- ~ Ca -- -- '-- - -- - - - -_. - --_ - - - - -
,. ~_
-- - -- _ 1-.~
_ a
~f R ~f 'f 'f (t !f f f [ t f r r r
-_
O
O
O
i
-
~
M
O
~
~
~ +
,
~
n
o
V1 !n t[1 Ol M O O M ~ l~ N
~fl tll In O M r-1 N M to r
''
V ~ d' 01 ~ Cl ~ M M W
O '~'
ri (
1
01
ri ri .-I tf1 ~ r-i N 61 <M
Ifl Ifl Ill ~ N ~ r-I O l0 1~ N - CO Gl
N
~c~ f
t
-
-
i
~ i
N N O lfl •C+
~~ p O O N ~ ri O N C O d' ~
O O O N ~ to I O Cl
- f~ - to
I~ N
ll1 !~
M
v1 to t!1 N 00 O
If') l0
1t1 O
CO O l~ ~ t0
N N N 61 M
O O O ~ '. O+ O M ~i' V~ If1
f`7 O~
to
ri r-I r1 l0 ~' O N l~ r-I N r-I
I
I
j t
i
i ~
I ~
+ ~
,
I
I i ~
i
~ ~i
I
i
_
i
_xsq{
~
'.
~ Y
-
~ 1
1 ~
'
~ ~. r
. C > C J "'
O !'f
"
'^ ^. t .Il C
1 !n
`n C
t Z v
1 ~
1 :!
!
_ .i: v ~
1 :t.
,y, r- 1 _
~ G: 1 L a i ... 1
I 1 .:.•
L 1 ~. ~- ... _
ti J T f '". C J"' 'l. ~ < .^ ,L .-. +~; N 1 ~i '1. "~ ? < .f~ l ._ J :_ ti _. 1 < J 1 Y a 7
1
1 rr 1` t J 1 _~ f
~ I- > ^~
4 < O 1
" .- > ".:
G t. .^~ 1
'~ .n
1 Y 1
l ^ J
~ -/.
.. _' n. _ 1
~ 4 .L 1
~ _ ,a. 7
z _ 7 V 7C ~t C O ~ Y _ _
~ .-.
' ~ 1 s
l i
•r, ..
1 1 c~ G 1 s_
' 1 a. > 1 O~ t O r 1 y Y 1 .. a. 1 ~ ^'
( 1 -
Y y< S .
>
.>
LL < A Q
u. ~/.. T G
" 1! J1 f Y S
nl i _^ Y
r- 7 ".C
N Y <
C O Q C
ti .i
'% 2 x
'l - i
~ :
2 W S !4 ~ C ti ~ tir /:
1 Y '1. Z ti C G S v ,.: ~
~~.
'
+ 1
O t- 2
+--' J' o ~-+ P '.= ~ ~ +-~ +-. G :.., G :,.7 > C1 O C v. J Z C ..}
'S ti ~. C ~ '-~
^ G ... U C
~ J ~
-
n C
~
Z ~- Y
•~
^' 3 ~
~
C '~' '~i'
,~
:u r ...
~
... .-.
,..
J .n .-.
~
w o '1 r~
I J rt; ...
.~ o Y ~
ti 2
.. O
aSUS ^-
R s a H
..Dx ti i
-^~ W ti Or~ti ti ~7r+ ~ .: !`W N '>,C ~. h x'~~ ti S E~ r\i 1 Ss. ~,
{ 3 _ a a to a a a s . - - _
o a ~ ~ ~ ~
s.
a;
r~ r N ~ ~1 •. r-I O ~ 61 ~ - r-I - M l4 l0 lC
~i O r ~ 1f1 O Ol N M N r r I~
`.I ~-+ ~ r-I rn o C m M c~ rn c
f ~ o ~n in M n1 ~ ,-1 c, rn c
~. O O~ 00 U' M r r d' N - N n
. n O N l~ W O~ ~ M M t.f) In lfl L^.
~f ~
sl
;i
l
1~
~I
3'
~I
t•
~~
~~~
,i
r r M n-1 l1'1 00 M O
' 7 N O O O r 00 ~O M r r r
d' T Vn tf1 W 01 O p U'1 tfI u1
~ O~ r ~ l0 CO lfl M ll) r U1 lf1 lf'1
`~ rn ~ in ~ m r ~ o 0 o c
~~ ~ j i j
1~ ~ I ~ ~
y~l
`~~ .,'
E'~
:;,~;;})
~i
'I
ii
`i~
:' ~r _ 1 _l I I Y .-. 1 1 C_- t ~' 1 1 Y G / a ~~ t 1 7 1 ' v _ 1
.r 1 1 ? ~r t ~-+ J~ 1 S C E 1 1 4 C 1 J~ 1 _ 1 i ~ C~ t
_ r X t- - G ~ S "' Q ~-. - - ---
J 'l 's J n. ~ l= _ J ti „ ~ J '~.` J _ r .. L 4 ~ '~ J Y J '~. .L < J 1~ _ ?_ .r '~; ~ J -
' • I U _ -_- .L _ ',il '.~ J 1 .al Q > .L' J L 1i y' 7 W ~ Y y > `
1 ... 1 •+ 1 -. ~ f ,~ -„ ~-+ 1 '_" J -+ 1 a ~ 1 ? :.r .-+ 1 ~+ ~ ~-+ 1 J ~ «• 1 ~ J ~-. 1 f
n ~ 111 ~ :L Z yt $' .. •^ • 1 L "C 1' G Z ~ it ~C tr 1 Y 1 y ~ y y
~~ ~~ ~ '" 2 >- C .~ s 'J; 'L' > P 2 ^.: ~ C ~ ti d LL 2. > ? 2 ~ C .~i,. 1 O .`.. 'U ~ P ~. ~~, .T
I~ I~ C J ~ G U ''~ = J C f-~ G U G y "' (~ C .~ O 1' C :J ~ O (,) C f C V O t; -~J C: _ .: ~l: (r
S c G. ~ +-~ S c .1 n .. r~ .-. r. 'Y .C .-+ ~ x 1- i ~ .-~ a~ .~ ., ,C •• ~ L ,-.
II~ n ~ s' ti C,T .C x /1. 1, ~ £ ti C: S R' ~- t Y. N 4 .-• :f; 11.' ~ O £Y' ^U Y .L x, ti J ,O ~ '\ 5 .C S ti T .C Y 'L
999 4 .: L2 ~ -_ - ;. Q ... ..„ ~ __. _ O
.. .. -. _.
f` -- .h - - - ---- -- - -- - -
~ ~
i
~ '. N ~ M i tf1
N V' d' N r{
M h ~ CO to i N
•--I .-1 rl M ~ M
N
j
•
to
N
N
M
I
N
r-I
N
N
M
r .'
a ~
~ (` ~
L(1 r"I ui
~ f`'1 ri
N cr N
N cr N
M l0 M
Ln
r#
N
N
M
M .h, M lD - '
N .-I ~ u'1 to u•1 to to to O tf1 ~
~ ~ ~ N ~ r ~ ~
u"1
r
a' N ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~, M ~ ~ M ~ t` ~ ~ lU \O ~ N lU l0
~
I I
i
i
i
i
I
! r-I
~
i
i
f I
I
i ~
~ ~ ~
~~ V~ - I r
~ ~ I i
i I ~
i ~
• ~
_~ ! I I
i
'
I
~
~ }
x v
T-
`
'L `^ Z J J" d Ri .A a ~ S ^J L ~ ~ ~ ~ rt '" ,
.
~
...i
~ ~>s o .n ~>:n c ~n -
~
N
J ~
/~
n
"' .:.
?
f'
. ~
I
_ r a ~'- _ r .+- ^ _ y < ^.+ _ _ ^.: > ~ _ tom: ~. ,l
-
. Y
-•
'
.1
J Z J
'L
J> J
^
'
'
' .~ G .= ,1 _ _ t
_
-
i
Y .+.
Y JJ ~ J Z J
i >
f
J t .. J
f i ~ a J l 4 4 J
' 'l. 4~
^V J .l 'l: .~ ti _
~ -
" ? Z, .
J -+ t y
J .+ 1 H
~+ 1 ..
1
J H 1 H
...
~-+ J 1 ~ CY
~- :
• 1 :Y ' ~
~-t
: 1 ;/.~ ^-
.-+ r -
~T. 1
r
.y T
.,.
1
x
L' '.
...
`
.... .
r ,.
.
~'
J. _.; a-n 1
' 1 Q S r 1 +- J ~-+ 1
r -
'%
_ ,r
%~
i :r ~.
ti
z _. _
ti
~-
~ =
~
n.
> ~ ~
rv
_+ s' x
~. U 1
~ o a C
1 LL Z
~ :n r x
n: y y
=
~ `..
v .L it
n.
~t ti :...
H C ~ tl: U C . ; R: U C ^" C U ^" ••- r U G a ~ C.V .
..: 'U L .
LL 7 Li C (
'1: `
L r.
5 ,C Y
I~
'1!
J:' r+
ff Jr 7!
A
'i
~-+ .` y
1:
G
A
'
'
"7 ~ M-1
^
'
A
1~ L H
A
Q .C ~"~
'
1~
a v7 M
A
S a.~
~
A
r..~ L
A _.
.,
1 .
Y L J .C
Z ti x .L Z N ~.
~ r ti 2 L Z '\:
Ic.
~
v
r .c x
U
~
~
x
Y
,
11
:.~ -~ _._.. __. _._ _ _ -~ ___ _"_. _ ___- _.. 0. - _ _- ~_
_ _
.., _...
. tom:. ._ __ _ ~"'
--- -
~' l` l' LI ~.~
< ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~ t ~ ~" s' a ? t i r
~ ~ :~
__.:~
II
i
'
~
~
~
'
0
~
j
l
f1
1
q
~
'
.
~
4 O O V1 r-I _ M O M O O O ~
O t` l0 lfl d' O N I~ l(1 V°
M ~ O Ul d' M ~ M ~ l0 O lfl O c:'
- U: V' d` rl N W N N N ~ N
~
M L.
M ~ ~ to W O1 l0 f~ M - M C
i
~
j
i
+1
I
r
` .
N r-I
' ~ ri ~ N lD N
to 1!
1 l~ O~ 01 1~ 61 i` N O ~
M ~ N ~ to N t!'1 01 O O O V' C
M N tf1 to t0 O~ l~ t!1 M O - ~1
~ ~ ~ ', ~ ~ N ~ M ~ M l0
I~ V! d' ~ T LD ~. Gl N V' t,p l0 L1
ri r1 O l~ r-I r-I ri N tp to
i
f
f
I
i .-i
1
i
~ ~ f ~
'
! ~ I
~
~
~
~ ~ i
1
~
~ i
~
I
~
r.
i i ~
_
I _
~
.
j
I I
i
!
i
-~
;~
i
s
a r ,
1
__ .. 'L' a .. ~ `n M ^_ .si Y ~/?
~
v
v
_r
a v ..
r. m, s
i
7
'
~.
~
r
z
-r _
to ..
r- I
r :J > .n _. 'S 7 1,' 7 .!1 } ~ 9 C~ :f1 A 3 c: > r .!'- _ J. r'
. C Y J .. J 1: `^ J v J Z J ~i J ~ U ,a 1! ^~ .. .. _
J
'1!
2
:' W7 Y J _
~ } ~,U k } 11 J 1- W 2.' Q J .L+ !; V" u.• Q J 1 ~ Y >~ 1
• t ~- _, 1 G x? 1 `-+ .: H 1 ~-' J ~-+ 1 ~ 1 .~ U S 1 ~¢ ~-. ! J !'^. ~-- 1 ¢ !--~ 1 J~ 1
V'! 1 LL. _ :f, 1i. '1 'S !a. 'S: .J :C 1.' C Q ~1. x J :L
~ G ,L.
•-~ 'r
:. ti Z lt` ti
... ti S :r'. ti 2 .!" ~i. 'l. il'q ti T 'L' 'Y ff S R~ ~ J O 't_'
Y */' ~ c U 1 U p tr C U K! U = U 1 `7 c ;.~ C ~; O 7 M J C ~+ :.7
~ -^- r 'L! V G
...
„~ .-. J G _ C U
~. O .p .... a. .t .r n 1 '~' O t~ ..+ .y H ~ r-~ .tr ^-1 .., .C tr x~ d ti d. x M .-r T ~ Y M. .... 1J 7' ~+.
K. G ~ ?
..
.. Y .t x 'L' Y 1 ~ ^V T .L Y 1: S -0 L ti T .G TI '1 ~. .._ 'V ..: .C ".Y'., !U J ~O T. !L U .L T fl; ~ .C :C.
~'
` •:
., ~
~ .. si
~ ~> ~ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! k k k c k ! ! ~. ~ ~
r ~
'~
l0
r
M
O
tl
O '
i
N
.
b
l
M ~O Ol 61 q O 01 - N '. r - O
r rl d' r G' N r ~ u1 r-I
ri l0 r-1 M tf1 61 r S4 - r 61 - r
N r O b r M V' d' b l0
1. d' 01 r M Cx7 Gl r-1 6~ N
N rl ':~ ri M ', rl ,~4' u~
r-I
.Vn~ -
N
d' ~ ~
o~ r rl ~ o .-~ ~ X N r rn
tf1 tf1 W M O G] O 'X, - ~ ~ N ~ O
N O t17 rl O r O ttl r~i N
N C O~ : l0 V' ~I' O ',x,' r M
N
N Q~ r to r lD N rv ~ Ol to
In N ri r-I N r ~ M S-i r-1
N
fL
O
. I ~ ' ~
i N
i ~ ~
i Q
{ ~ w
H
,~
~ ~
_ O '
,~ _
U r ^ r
.y a N ~ L' ti -
'
i
-
a .c i a ~
.._ 1 ti~ 7 i ^_. r -~ 1 u i _ 1 ~ i _ -- 1 _ -~ /
' _ _ ~ ' -
..~ 3 ~- C ~ G X S .- ~-- J .-. :t y ..~ _ - G ~ ._ .r - "T 1. C ~ .e
_ 1 ..^ 1 _c Y 1 _ L .!~ 1 J --~ 1 LL ._ 1 ~ a f ~ a t .r t :J - .' 1 c 1
ti G y .. '1. "1i 1' J J `1. ~ 2 ..J `L ~ J v ~ Y ~ 'i~ •--r a ~.., ^u 1
~ y
- t :a. ,_. 1
.
-- ? ! s ~
:' 1 ? L
' 1 _~ H t X J H 1 J 1 ...
~ 1 1 1 1 f !
J i
~ r J Y J :s: 4S. Z. i ,i :: yt
y i S .-~ 'L J Y C ~.
~.J
~ 2 C-~c7 1, ~J Ri ~ o~ ~N ti' JCS '~ JC2 JOT '~. Jd2 ^.r a < 'L 2
'-+ :f~ ~--• ~ J .- •.• "+ C J Y .. J C 'C O ;~ C J C U C J c J c C.F G 2 .l 7 c ~ C J =
'~ L lf' a.. x Y .. y T ... 1- x ~ J'.:i x ~^ d L e O H .a.: ~ H T :i ~~ 't .a, r~ ..e Y T .... S ^ 4 L
... ti c7
~ ". "` ~ 1; ~ ..+ ~ ti '~ f F v n T/'. F, 'L u..-. x N ~ .D .M '~' L ~,: 1 2; S..Y' .. ^ R: ~: ti f .~ ,.
~
i
Ij
11~1
`i'
!.
:~i
~55'
11
r-I V' .~ h ~ to 01 tP M Ol N ri
lfl ~ ~ q M ~ O ~ CO V' to ~ cr q Cl
rl d' q O - In ~ rl ~ C` M q q Gi
~P !~ ri l~ r-i lfl CD N M ~ 1~ N
vT OD Ol q O rl lfl CO ~ ri q l~
M M ~ M ~ M cl' ~ M M ~ O In C`.
r-i r-1
q cN <J' 01
to q CO ~. Ol
N rf O O
q r q r
~ r
i r
i
i r
i
I i
I
- ri
ri M l~ ~ ~ ~ N q ~
q O 6~ CO ~O O N
01 l~ Ol e-i 61 r-1 O
01 ~ N N lD ri l~ M
n q r r o ~ c,
~
I ~
~ j
i
j
I -
1
i ~ i i ~
~
j
i
M1
~
I
~ ~
'
i
~
l ..ry r h v
ti N '+7 v R: ~ Y~ v Y
r
~
.c
v
x
v
c
.-
ti
n;
v Y
~' J~ c ^t ~_ 7^ _ ~~ _ n o r ~' - -
>
o
>
c
.~
c
c
:~ > _
~
r.
.r
c
~. _
c
1 a • 1 a 1 •a C t 1 " a t a 1 1 -_ 1 ~ _ 1 d 1
Y ~ ~ ^
t a ~ r 4~ ~ J: ~ - ? 2 a 7 Z -
L c* +.C ~
~ ~ ¢ - _ S ?;
~ ~ d '. '^ ~ a ~
2 1 ~" 6 1 .L' c 1 / d 1 a a 1 J 1 :, d 1 J l
" 1
^ ~ 1
n
- ~. `.. a J ..
^ =' a J Z J Y J "~ a J ~. Cu a J ~ ~'Y J '\~ .i a .a '\ .: J
n t _, _ ~ J _
_
.--~ X ~ 0. 'Y :al J :K :aJ .t. C J ~ Y t~ _ 7 ':.1 t C ,aJ r Y :a, .+.~ •-. .-+- i' ~ U
2- - 1
` 1 1 -+ 1 ~-+ 1 L ~-•' 1 ~+
V 1 -+ Q~ 1 U t^ -+ 1 :1. ~+ t
.. 1 ~ .-~
~ 1
~.
:.7 ~ ~ r .i
:~ y y :~.. ~ a :L S _
1. r, :~ .a. 1 ~.. :L LL 2: '1. x
' i
LL
^
.
- L t~ Z ti .•• S '1: S o t ^. S ~^ ~ N t+ i ~L S c S 2 x~ n.. c 2 ^.. :~ ~ ~ i c S ,
_
2:= _ C Z.-J f 1! V C JOU G ~: 1U = ~%11:U UGC,: o JC U C ¢CU O UOtJ C U~U c
_ ~ M1
~:.~na ~ ti -,sx '~ ~c x n: s.az L ~^, cx v ~ ox ti z s >• 'i. z.cx v _x rs n, :s .os~ v -z.~x n.
0~
i. ~ • - _
_
_
_ s ~
:,
_
Gi
__ .._
_
__.
+
_
__ ___ ___. _
,
:~~
. _
. -_ _ __ ___ s_.
_
L _ _~ ~ ` < < < < ` < < `
i ~ ~ ~ ~ < < t L t L,
~ t ~ f P f ~ ~ P P ;' t +"
ic9 = ~ J
~ K ,
1~
I r ' `
~ G
i
j
~ I ~
C
M
~
I N j I i ' ! 1
~ I I i
~
i M
~ ! I
-. ~ i
I ~ I
I
l _ ~ I j I
i
I
~
' i
i
O
i
i
~ ~
i~: ..
I~ ~.
'~ r
Iv r+ _
~- tf1 I I U
Oll:
ri1C x
ICr t
..,~ _
Y < 7
ry Y
r
Q ~
>
' _ J 7
Y a
a
~ ~ i i
~
~
;n
,.., y,r ~
r ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
,_-_
_ -ti
~--
_
1 :~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ! '~ ~ ! 1 '1 ! ~ 1 ! ! ~ ~
_a ..
1
. i
I 1 I
j
i
~
i
'
~ 1
1
j
~ i i
' i
~ ~
+
1
O
~
~
~ j
M
ii
M
~
~
~ ~ I I M tf1 ~ d' ~ M O W In
I I
~ j H I
i ' CJ I h i M i ~ N ~ O i ~
~ ~ ~ 1 W O ! 00 Ol ~ l0 I I N
I
i
O
~O ~ !
<Y
~
l0
N
!
'V'
I I ! ~
~ ~
x x. i ~ 333
1 Y' ~: #i ~ I i ~ l
1 #. ti ^. #_ j I i
# x x
# .. Y- h x.
# J yt .. # ~ 1 '. !
~
# .~ :: x
i C ~ #
Y ~ :~ .~ x ~
`'' - ~i r 61 O ~ M ~ Ol
# ~
Y
~ Y ¢ ~ #
Y - # V
C~
o
M
rn
N
~
m
~ - ~` r.C V' r-1 N M N
# a
4 R
-
•
Y
Y Cc ~. Y
Y f~ ~ # I
ti
~
# ~
# i ~
i
Y. '
Y 1 V. ;y' ~
Y _ _ ~ #
j # ... < # ~
Y _ _ #
# .~ _ #'
.-.
' # - la # ~ f
in x
r
1
# i C #
# s ... _ x ~
x > ~ Y ,.. f ~ ~ '
Y
s I
~ x
Y L`
• _ .. x
R ~ Y - :a x
. ....
x t
/ ~' # f
# G ~ !1 _.
• 3 Y
• ~ Y
^
~~
_
- Y
Y ._ T
# I
~
.--. -_ ~
f - .L
# ~ \ _. ~ f r :_ ~ C _- 1. _ C f
y ~ _ ~. _ d G .-~ .. _
_ -
i 1 ~ Y • • C _ ~ __. _ ~ _ ?
r
\ a ~t i Y + # rt \ \ \ \ \ 1 !l .[ _ (`. C 1, (~
~r
~. "'j .[' ~ L ti ~... 1. Y ~ 1 ~
J- fi-
~ -- ~ ~_ .
1 ? ~ 1
J 1 ) 1 ) ) ~ - ) ) ) ) ? ~
~ / 1 i / ~ / i / 1 1 t f ! t '
a
~r~
-~,
r
~ i
'
~:
is
t0
M
ri•
'
M
~Y
~
O
M'
N
~,
V'
O
~
. I Cl l0 d> ~ N N N rl V' r1 M C
N N O [~ N ~I1 61 M ~f1 N C
I Lh N O CU Ol r-I N rl r-I N t
~ v~ o r ~ ~ M ~n o <r ~ r
I
i
i
I, ~ ~ ~
'~
~i i
~o .-i N r r, r
I l`J V' O M O l0 V' l0 V' c
~ n
t~
d'
~-1
V'
W
O
~
r-I
O
rl
r
O t0 O ~ r-1 M - O ~ r-I V' rl W C
rl r1 ri tI) ~O V' M 61 ~ (~
~
~. O
rl
~ .
O .
to .
M
~ .
ri ~
n .
O .
ri ,.
r-
ul
~ N r-i
~ r1 rl .-i N
, N ri
~
`
~ I i
1 ~ ~
~ I
I
~
I
~ I
I i ~ ~,
_ i
~
~
I
~ '
-
'1
~, 11•
~
~~ A u ~
M1
M C
i+ U
'n N ~ ti h a!
`
> v ,t ~ 1 _ 'Y ~`? ~L• Y t^~ i
: c.i .n n J Q !~ _ ^ C G _ .: _
r.
y ,(~~ 1 { Y J .C 1 "' 1 ~ ~- 1 U; 1 ~• l~ +~ 1 t C~ 1 .~ l 1 -- 1 1
r
T ~ ~ ~
! u. v: c { '~ J 1 CO J 1 J 1 '" J ! ~ r 1 _ 1 s+ ~ t '-~ ~ 1
~ 1 - -~ 1
: J ~ J •"'~ ^~ 7 y C ..~ ~ 'C :: ~ 7 ~ .Z = , .. :f_ U i Y ~ .f. 1 L :~ ' ~ :. ~ Z
~.
' ~1, U J J '1r 'i J ti ~ U J 'l: .:.3 ti ~ 3 v '~.' L~ . t .~ 'U F J 1
y
;
x z 1 ? r-+ 1 •^ C :~ 1 :f: 1 C' 2 1 _• •-+
y 1 > 1 a
' 1 a
~'- 1 r 2
^ 1 ~~ t
~
' JJ ^ ~ J LL ` J <' 4 "~ J la. L _. 1 Z :aJ
1 S 1' ¢ Y: '.J
y ~`. 1
.1 '/.
LL > a
Y
~ Y 1: <
P 2 '\.~ U ti y: M 2 '1i J `^ Z n, c." •lt ~-• O ._ 'V > ~C 2 'V J 1' Z •1. 1~ Z Y Q 1
.
' 2 P Z
O C O
~ _
r U
~ V' H C
'~ r .-i H
X ti X :.
'~ f..i r'. :..i
x ~I~ r+ ~
e~ y rr Li
T .f: ar G'
~ 1. G r
¢ !~ H =
.~ :-^, C N
J :f~ '~ 7
t~ c M U
a ~ r.. ~
~ J M J
s-• r~ •-• C
~ :1: ..a U
.6 ~-. ~
•~ ~ 'T
L 'J` 1- -
' 2 ~ 2 ~L = •O .'1; '~ ~ U
y ^. ti ~ y s: x 'l Jf .L D!: 1 c ~• Y' ti '' 1' +~ W ti -- o Y ti 3 0 ~ ti .: •D 4: v S ~ V: _
.~:+. . _x s~
_ __ ___ _ __ __. ... ~ _ _"_._ _ _ _
• • . ~ ~ r r r r P f f f r ~ l ( ~ % r
o
. h M ~ M ~ h N N - N ~ b v7
:17 r-I 61 O W t~ h q ~ r-I r-I U'
. M G' •
~ rl N O ~ b CO W C C~
t0 l0 O r-I C O to O l0 V' ~
N M N h N h CO cfl M ~ ~ r-F
N
W In . 61 C V~ N N Cl ~ ~ ~n
~-I V~ ri ri N cM ri ri
:(
' M ~ N ~ ~' M 'V' OJ
' 61 CO h O N l0 61 O O M r{
• r1 to l0 to ~Y' 'V' l!1 CO N L!1 C
~ o o ~ eo o h ~ ,-1 ao ~n ao
<A ~O C N M N M 01 to N N
'. t0 O 00 Q1 CO Cl 1I1 ~ C' O~ W N
' rI M
i M N 'cY q N M r--I
~ I ~
1
i
~
~ ~
i
!
,
i ',
~
'
f 1
'
1
~
j
I ~
1
-'.%.C"~
I I ~
f
~ Y Y
J _ .L
~ L Z_
_ _ J ;f: n
_
~ W > !^ > to ~; > .f, ~ .... ~ y a I I
>: r J Y J~ v `- 1 Y `- 1 > .!'' v z ~X.- I a 2 / v Y __
~ .
r v
r " 4 ._ ~.
/ '. ~ 1 .: ~ ! :[ a 1 _n. 1 a t a ? 1 ~Y 1 ,: ~ 1 c ~- t
_
Y ~- :: ~1' ~ '\' J ~ J 7 J 'l' J .. " J- a 1: .l ~'1. 't, F J R, J
^ J L .
~, J
1 C_ 1 .i 1 H 1 J 1 .Y' .T_ I :.r .._ i t.:... 1 .- r+
_
1' _^_ N Z ~L ~- t4 T ~t .•• C7 ~ .-. Cf,~ r.. ~ = ti ^~ O'., ti ~ .'J' 2 '\
~'l ~ c =~J O S ?U G .-.J ...V c Y'1,J ~.~CJ O c c - a ~C1 Y'lU r~1,L
• 1J C J ~ s "" r 4 3 .-~ t~ 2 7 H a• ~ H ~ ~ 2. 7 t1. !~ C Z d J .C •+ ~ 'L :!' ~ C ~ «+
.-.
2 v C .C ~., rty ~ .O x .ti O .C X 1 J S :1. ti .C F: ti .i r, r .. tG~ w~~ Z. v W .G x, 1 .^. .U Z, ti , J D 7;
_ =a4: _.
+~ 3 9 1 ! 1 t ~ 4
-,
,:
_...I ; -
i
it '
;I .
.i
~n c~ ut rl ~r o in in ~ ,n ,~
;I rl 01 [~ Ol Ol ~ d' Ol l0 b er
~ ~ I~ to !~ m _ N t0 M l~ Ol to l0
r-I N 1~ M h ~M r-I l~ l~ d' l^,
'. ~ N Gl O ri l[1 M l0 N N N M
i . . ~
i t ~--I !` d' Ol N l0 N O t` ~ M
it N N ~ N O c0 cr
N
i
~!
;I
~, ! ~ ~
~i ~
U1
~I
M M Q, Q~ r O M
I N d' O O O Ol al d' 61 O
i . . . . . y
I1T 01 M If1 N
~ I l0 N N O !~ S~1 N M CO V' ~ O
.I N c0 r1 N 01 N i'~ N V' V~ h
II N In '. CO CO ~ V' O V' O d' N l0
~ C N rl V' r1 N CO r--1 rl
N .-I
~ j ~ i
II 1 I QI 1
I~
~~ ~ ,.
I~ ! ~ '
i
f
I;
~'
~~ _
i Q t = ~ -
~ -- 1 t _. _
J a[ L
~ ~
- '~ ~- i 1 1 1 a 1 ,,. C f -- ~y 6 1 Z~ 1 J> n 1 1 Z 1
1 1 J¢ ~ 1 ~ K_ _ ! :l G ~ 1 •-+ 1~ 1 Y `. 1 1 ~1 1 - 1 f
. _ ~ 7 X 7 2 .r+ K ~ < J
i~¢ ;!: ..; l -, ... n, y ~ J 1: :.. c J ~1, J" ~ J J A, L 5 :J ti ~- .. ._ r- J
I' tL i ¢ 1- > .al Y Y ..u > :li .y ^ yl J C rl _~~ J v 1.
.7 z ~- 1 1~ a £ 1 J ~-+ 1 ~ J ~-+ 1 ~- .~ ~+ t 1 ~-+ 1 <' -.. ~ 1 .~ r E f .4. „~ £ ~1 ^• £ " t ~^ y U F
Y.:1" L .'~. ~- L JS '1 4 vim, 2 'L ^_. .G S ..: O S '\ > O Z A' "' C Y /'., t- V} 2' :7? f '~.' J ti ¢ ti J !t ¢ 2
"` ~T U C ~- C t3 C G •'7 G 2' ? J +,. O U Y r 'r :f ry -
~. .~ n .- ~- C .~
r
.I I ¢ .. = ;/: O„ n ~,. ~ .~ n ^. 1 .r n :7 ~ r. n .-+ ¢ .-. Y. r C n 1 <. r G r c
~ J O :Y ti := ••• s, 'L ~ .^l .O Z" '~: 3 .O ~ 'L 'Y .G Y. '1, ~ 'J .C Y N J K H N ~ Z N 5_ 1 Q !'D S. '2 U ~•• :i A U r• 1 ti
-. - - '...
1( R it !t ~t 't ~( t 'i ( t d ~t r r
O O O l!'1 M O CO '. r-I ~ ~ try ~ M O
Ifl tf1 u'1 Ol M O O M l0 (~ N
' N U1 tf1 O M rl N M ~ ~ I~ q
d' d' d' Ol 61 C1 M M
' ~ W
O d'
-I M
Cl
r-I rl ri 111 rI N 61 V e
tI1 tf> tll N ' .--1 O l0 l~ N ~ ~
• - M , v1 r{ M ri l0 N
' ~ N
: v{
-
N N O ~ ~
O O O N r1 O ~ 'd' O V' ~
' O O O N tl) O 01
lO i~
O U'1
l~ _ N
tf1
- [~
M
N ~ ~ N
01 lb
M O
ti f 111 W O l~ O
N N N
O O O V' O O
~ M V' d' 111
M 61
to
i rl r-t ' ri to c~ N t~ rl N ~
i
I '
I
~ ,
~ ~
i
~
~
i ~
i
I
I
I I
i
i
~ ~
i
P. i '
:
Il
~
I O
i I
i
_~ j
~ ~ Y
^ 1 ..
1 ~ _
Y
1 1 i ~ t i +- 1 V 1 'L C~ 1 '. .G 1
:/; 1 :u Y 1 ~~ 1- 1 .~ h 1 . . .
.
° .V J i J' " C J T 1, '~ < ... ti .-. ~~. N 1 ~i ti
~ . ,' 4 T Z' _. _ ti F 1 .
~. J 1 X 6 ~
` 1 .. 1` .
1 J 1 J1 I 1- > 'L 1 .
- > ^~ 1 1 _^. J ~ >•- 1 *- 1 = - '
' 1
' Y
^ V 'K 3 .., C O ~T ~ Y J c a C ~ C .S J '~ J Y l C ~. O :.'1 '_ 4 y J :_ .a. 1
.
, _
1-
^ 1 ..
1- f i, >- 1 J 2 1 .-. F .-a 1 ~
y 1 f ~ 1
. r -- .-.
~ 1 O; 4 - s _
n t i > 1
O .
`
V'
~-
J x .
i ~ r T .
Y 4 -^. .~. x t` cf.' :L x Y
c >
~
~ T
'1 a
Y r1: 2 .A
N a
ti
;
^
C S Z
1~ Y C
.:: ~-' ,.
'~ .
.
.
.= 'ti r '~ ti C 7 ~ .ti J c S. 1 S ~.: S 'L 'Y C =' ti ~.~ V :f;
II¢ R, L .
C --~ ... r c .
,
.-a J G °i 7 -+ O f C .-. J'T ~~ r-~
' J `-. c L: C J i Ci
... ~-. G
. 4 ~ ..~
J C
~ W Q 1
~
`J n; ...
' ~ E x O ~ Y a .-1
1" ~
ti i 2 C
r- :il .
'1: Z :. r
C r~ 2 ~
'L _~ r
~ 1~ %' .. ti
b
,_ t~ :tJ ~
N y J:..
7 .L CY ~
+~. ~ 1' ^-0 ~ 'L' :.J ~ S N 1 J1 ~ ~; ~l.
~ j J
C Y ti d •C ua h = .O . , _
- - _ _
:~ ~ a o .a
--e i
i
1. 1~ N to ri O ~ 61 - ri M V7 ~ lD
O l~ to O Gl N M N h l~ ('
' r-1 O 117 - I!) M r-I l0 r-I G1 61
O 01 p <M M 1~ - t` C N N
~ ~ O N 1~ ~ p 01 M ~ M ~ 171 In to _
is
li ,
ii
_.:=j(
..
r n M .-{ Ir1 p M o
1 M N to tL1 ~7' bl l0 ~ M M M
' N O O ~ O l~ p ~ l0 M [~ (\ 1~
i 'C Gl ~ V' t71 p 01 O p 171 l71 L
I ~ 01 l~ ~O p lfl M N l~ ~ t71 171
~+ rn ui ui ~o 0o r r o 0 o c
II ,
~ i i ! i i '
~~ I i
it
(~ '
_~ ~ ~ ;
,~
i
,,
,,
. ji = =~ _
J J tl `~ T v, ,r
_ ~• 'U ~ ~. i 'U .f ._ 'i C ~ '~• L
a L' C a J .a J -. t T v~ Z c v ,^j _ `^ Z `•1 J
P t 1 1 i-. J~ 1 4 1 i a s 1 J~ 1 1 ~ L 1 ~ c~ 1
J 1 J R ... '1,~ _ J .. :: :~ _! '1' J _ 'l _ a _r !1 Y 1, t ~ J '~: 7. J 'L• J
' I U .L '.U `J J 1 .a.l Q > ..f 'L 11 1.` Y T yi >
1 ... 1 '-+ 1 ~--' E 1 ... .~ ti 1 J ~-+ 1 .t z O 1 .~? ~^. «-~ I H 0. -+ 1 ~ r+ t .+ J .-+ 1 _ .~
:> ~ ~; ~ ~ x _ :,. r ~ ~ a .~ r :~ -c s a z c w x ~ .~ x i v :.. c .. .~ ~- :~
' ''] -" r, ti >- c '- 1 s T 'L T o Z ^.: C .: 't~ O 4 .~ ?? S r„ '~ c ;: 1 o S 'U f r~ ;^• S
-~I¢cJ c r- c V a J c F- cU c w^^U c .+ a s cU c ~~cU c E cU o t_; 'UU o _: rti; t; -
=cam e~...l S c1 ~ ..rH r+ Z.c ,.. ~:O h- sA~ n .C .. -. .y ...
na r: ti U,C 1i ti f ~ t N ~U ~[~ /l' r 2T. rJ 4.-•.!? tti~ ~ O,2' 1• Y.C x. ti J.C7 1 Y ~T. 'ti ^»'.C 2 1.
.,~ I• " cw ._ _._-_ -_ ~_____ _ .__ .' .; cam:-- - __ -tOb-_ - >__ - v_= - ___ -_ v
,~ ~~
~ ~
M
~
N
N `
01
lD i
r ~
(vl
61
to
Gl
lfl
p~
In ~
to
{
.-1
th 6l
r l0
~ ~ M
t!'` N
N N
N N
N N
N C
'V'
.-1
N r-I .-i M - ~ M M M M ~
M
N cr
r-I !h
U1 ~
to
to
to
~ ~
- N
O
`n
~n
c `"
r
~n °'
~
r N
~
o r
~
<r r
~
v' r
~
v' r
,.~
v' ~n
M
o~
N
~ M f`'1 r ~ ~ t0 ~ ~
~ l0 N
~ .--I
' ~
~ ~ i
I
~ !
~
I
i
N
r-I
N
N
f~'1
M
r
`~.
tf1
r-I
N
N
M
L7
n
r-t
'
'
t
~ ~
t
- I
~ ~ i
'
i
~
I
I
-:L`.i ~
~
i
- ',' ~ ~ .
~ v
' _ Y
~ y L: r
•-
. , r 'R .^ /; 'v1 ~ 11 yr 1, ..~ . .. r , .~'
T Z :~ r
... > ~ G n J > J1 r S !1 '' f 1 ~ ^ C J
. :.J > 1 C :1 _ _
i d 1. ~ f; ~ ~- ~
' ~ C~ ~ 4 1 J . 1 J v .f ~
1^ v
J y 1 ~ 1 Y .-, _
'
'\ ~
y
- L
"J _ ^
- v
_ _
~ .
T
1 ; Z_ J
Y ti J ,
J N J 2 J 1' J 2 r .~
n K R
J
'~
~ J
'u
J Z ~
~ _
_
.L ~ ~
^ _-
J ~
"L
.
^ J .: t u_
., J
H 1 ~ Y ti i U > .:1 Y
:
U •~- S ' y l
: _ ~
y
J .-~ t .
i
J 1 ~- ~ ! ,: ., ! r, L, . 1 1 ¢ S 1 .- J .
-. 1
J ._ 1. `J _. 1' S .t' _. ti 2' ^ ; N Y 2' 2 'V S ~, S '1i ? O~
' 1 ~
'' ' y ^ Z + .,. l L
U 1` C L. ti U C :: 1 U C C C U C _
:r n; U C x N v.`. •-•~ r. U C .
C~ U C J
S
:J 'U C: 1: ? tit _ '
`~ L
Y .[ Y
f~
1' .
L H
SY ~ ]S
~
~-+ .C y
~
"7 ,G H
n
~-t .G ~"1
A
Q Si H
]~
Q .L y
1~ .
1' ~ M
n
r-~ ~ hr LL
U
.L nd. C L 1 :..
•r ~ r
A
~
.. _ 1 x ~ Y N ~ S Z ti Y ,L x ti ~ .: x ti Z L~ ';: ~ L 7. 'l: ~~ .C Y .. d ,C ~Z: ti Y .L T v
~ _
_
0
_
_.___
.. 4
_ ____
- _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _
._ _
__
_
___ _
__
_" ~ ~ Z t P ~ ~ +P 3 t ~ t ~ Y" P r r
~ ~ ~ _, _,
. ~
i
i
D
O
O
i
i
~
N
~
~
rl
.
~
M
fn
.
n
a
~
•
r
::
ul
~ O M O ~ C1 O [~
i
o
M
O
r
N •
~
~
~ ul
~r
o
ao
r
N
~r
to d'
^."~ M
N M
W l0
N O l0 N ~,
f
M ~ _ N N N ~ C
r
~ N M ~
. ,--1 M N
' ~ i ~
~. 1 - '~
f
b
N
.-{
N
r-I
r i
1
~ i9 i
N
M
N
l0
' 01 Ol I~ 01 l~ N DO ~ Gl
M
M N
N N
N N tf1 01 O W O ~ G,
1
W N
W l0
I W [~
' N M O tf1
~ ~ ~ r to V M V' M ~p
t` V~
r-1 ~N
l Ol l0 ~ ~ ~ - ': N V` l0 ~ C~
r O l~ ! e-~ ,-i r-{ N l0 t1l
'
j
~ ~ ~
~ ~ t
~ ~
' I
~
~
i
~ I ; ~
~
~
~ ~ ~
i
'; '
.:
.
j
-~
{I
!
1
Ji
1
r
~
~ ~
_ _
_
i r ~> r ~ .-~ ~ .ter. c r, .. ~ _
a .~.>n > n c n ~r ~ c > _ _
r c r c
. a 1 C r. Fr _ T, a r, q l: r
~
r - a -
~ ~ a _. s c a ~ 1- n s c a _
_ _
~
_ t .- 1 a x > 1 J ti 1 ^- J ~-+ 1
~ 1 .r U .f 1 ~ a .-+ 1 ..; '^ +-+ 1 ~< ~-+ 1 J •- t
/~ =~ LL x
~
_ ~ f i ti LL x !i '.L. 'x. :1
_. ~ 1' _ Q .1 L J :L -L Q aL '-" 1 1 ``
r ti Z N ~" ti ~ ~--~ 1 S ;~" S !l: = T~ ti ti U ~~ ti ~ S ti ~ iT S- fv 7 S. '\, J C 'L'
"' C U ti U C Li ~ C U 'U ~1 ~„ U 'l: .l :,> C (~~ O 7 M J C ~+ J
~ C c 'L U G .-~ ;,./, c C U
~. ~ ,D .r
~ ... .t; ^-, n
~
:i. '~ O !~ ....t o-y ~ ,-. .G ..r ~ ',:, .L.` e-e K~ G 1 y ,Y H .r r - ,n w..c Y. M ._. .;. 'i; ~ +.+ '^
1 O L Y J Y .C X 'L Y J .r 'V Y .L 2, 'L' Y t Y. R. Y .C ~ 1 g ••• < v . U .C Y 'L :J .O Y ~1; U .C T ti ~ .C .2'
( t • • f r ~ r s ~ r r r
o ~ ~ o va
r ~o ~ M o in o N q c~
M lp 61 Gl q O Ol In r O
'~
1~ r-1 7' l~ d' N r l0 ~fl r-I
N 1~ O q l~ M ~ d' d' q lD
~:
~. d' 01 ~ l~ M q 61 .-1 Ol ~ N
N ri ~~ ri M rl >C ~ N
r-1
1~
S~
~
q N
~
q r ,~ ~r o .-i ~ 7C N r rn
i
to In q M O q O '~ C~ N O
N - O 111 r•I O t` O b ri N
N d' Q~ l0 V' d' q 9C l~ M
N
N O~ l~ ~ h lD q ,~f, 61 to
lf1 N ri ri N [~ M N ~ r-I
Q
' i ~ '
.
' I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ i i
~ I
y; W i ..
'~ j
i
't"d~
I ~.
-
•
H
i ~
O
-
`~ ~ _,
,
V f ... W r ~.
.~.~ 4 N > 1 ~ 11 Y
- h c a J O O
~ - t. a c ~-
_. ~ .C 1 .~ 4 '+ 1 N= 1 ^ f; ~ f U 1 I 1 1 1 _ 1 1 t
..
- 1 -~ .P 1 ~ Y Y 1 L J~ 1 J ~-+ 1 Lt " 1 s a f `. v 1 ._ 1 ~~
._ 1 ~_~ 1
~.y„ 7 Jl a J J C - 7 - _ 7 J? ~
-~ E i '.7 4 't 2 '..u Y
ti
Y .L 1' .i: x
- 1 :a. _
T~ f ~ ~'
~ 1 T S ,~ 1 ? i 1 _
~ 1 X J~ 1 J r-. 1
~ 1 ^. 1 1 1 ^. /:
J y 2 '..', '^ n
J T ~'C J x q Z iy .Y. :... :t, - .`
:i i S ~-+ S
' J Y G
~J
~ ~1. C ~+~ 'L ~J ~ti > o~ .L .~~ 1' JCS ~ J2 ~: JGZ; JoS ~ 4 1:
^ 2
~r c .-• .t+ J c _ .-. ~-+ a J c x .~ J c 'Y c U c J c v ;..r c J c u c x l~ c r _
j ~~ ~ x z .-. y x .~. r r r. a_ x .~ ~. x a c ... 1: 7 ., m .,: v. r ... r~ ,..r x ~ a .:, x z
~ c7 1' T cp ~ ti 4 •r n .^li s „r. T 1 '!) K'. ~'. 1' 1L .~+ S •'ti .:. .D _^"... 1' ~ ~O .'. '\ ~..C .Y. Y .^ R: ~. ti L 'S O. V
1~
m_ '
- ww-
-
a ~ t ~ t t t t t r r r ~ - f
~-
~,
i
I
~.
l
i
-1
~
-1
h
N
1
P
M
~
N
-I
1 ~ l0 q M ~ O ~D V' t11 d' q (..
1 .-V 'V' q O ~ N 1-i ~ ~ ~p ~ M q q Gl
~. C' h r--I ~ h r-1 In O N M h N
C' q Ol q O r-1 l0 q rl q h
~
M M ~ M M dl C M M ~ O to cT
.
'.
_ r-I ri
i
I
~.
~
- :
I
I.
1
<•1
~
- ;
~
~
q V' - C ~ 01 ~ M h ~ ~ N q l0
1 N q l0 O1 i q O Ol l0 ~D O N
V1 r-I O O O~ h IT ri Ol ri ~ O
~~ q h q h 6l N N l0 r-I t~ M
I ~ ~ ~ ~ h h ~ i co h r o .-I ~
1' i
~ ~
'; ~
i i -
i N r-I M
~,
-~
~jj.
!t,
t
: I
~ i
~ i
~
1
~ I
~ i
~
I
i I t
~ j '
`
l'
~~
.ry
`^
.n
r
Y
Il a r a .c .v :c; 'r ^~: c ~1. ~i: 1.~
l
~ 1 v t 1 t 1 a t
a 1 a • I K 1 ,a p t t a _ -
~ Y •
_ ~ _
t a ^ s ~' 7 'l s. _ ~ S a .L _ 1 2 ~ y ~ 7 K ~ _ - +
-. K ~ Q 3 - :_
_
_ ~ 1 S 1 y G 1 J 1 d ! K a 1 ~ / ~'. S t J l - i -= 1
- 1 .-. d J ~
^ =¢ J 1 '~' J 1 s J ~ .: ~= -i 'i .~ ^' J '~~ is d J 1 ^_' J R Y _.
w J Y J
a
••
_
~1 .-.. x ~ d 'Y :il J :Y '.ai 1: C W =~ 7 11 '.Y ;J .L. ^, yi ~- 7 .a.. _
~^ 1 L
.-~ "
~ 1
~ ~ -- 1 .r
` ! - -~ 1 "" y M 1 ~'
` i :.: •-1 1 ~". LL ..y 1 .J ... ^'~ 1 ~. .-a 1 r
:
' Z ...
.L LL
1, ',7 T. !.7
K. x L
" "^
'
' J. iL 4
2 6
S `^ L 'f_
N ._ :1.
~.- ~ S f
~1: :L tl.
L G S :L` 1 y W:
~ K
~. 1
C S Z:
~ 1
a.
= 0 2 '\ : C y ";
S; - 1
C ~ 2
~ .+ .~ 1 .-
~ ti U L
C S C T
U o U =- 1' !ti :.7 `= /; A U C U C U O .
J G U O Q C U
' 0 :.: C L?
' C
' U~ rJ
/
-+ y.
=
~' U ~ .C ~I = Y 1~ !~ H X
' LL f+ o--1 't ~ ~ ~-1 t i f+ f~ .-1
: T
1 .C ..1
o:
a Y ~
v Y l~ H
x t ~ -C.
n ti ~ ~-t
s .o ~ l:
rv r
s .a r ..
p ~ a ~ ti ~ .c x, ~, ~ c x 1; 2 .c z L. .y c s, v f o z n: r s
~ . .
. ,
L - -- - - - ` -
_:- tea.
..
_ -
~
._ _.~. ~.F95 - - ~ a
'-
r t r r r : r r r r r t r .-
~.
-
,, ~ ~
I
. N '. ~
~N i I i I -
~ ~
i
O ; ~ I ~ '
rn ~
'
- ~ ~
~ i
~
r.+ i
~ • i '.
i
i i
' ,
~ , i
~ 7 ~
I
~ ~
~ !
~
o I j i
~ j
I ~ ~
l i i ,
~
i
~
' i '
i i
o i
~'-- r-y-~-. E ~ ~ i '
--
`~ W
r
a r
~ 1t7 I I
olt;
rl 1 C x
< .1
L'
.
.,r S_
..
y
Y
-
7
Y
Y
Q .1.: :.
i c:.n , ~ +
~, .. ...
~ •'~. ~ 1 ~ '} ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ '1 'f ~ 1 1 1 7 ~ ?
_
'
-- _ - - ~ .__.
I
~
~ - -
~ -- -
a
_._ _
1,.
I,
ll
I
.
j
i ~
~ ~
,
j '
~
~
~
,
; ~
~
~
~
j
~
j
I
~
~
~
I
1
~
~
~
~-
i
; ~ ~ oo I rn ~ i M I M ~o rn l
E' ! M tf1 f C i M ~
i O N U1
I I ~ q I r M l0 N O ~ l0
~• I W O ~ i tb ~ Ol l0 N
O i O W ~ •. l~ ~ r-I I N V'
i I
I ,
1'4 1
N I
I
tD i
~ i
i
I
~T
~ ~ i
; , ~ ~ i I
j ~ I I
I ~ ! ~ ~
~ ~ i
j
1
~
« «. ~
i ~~
!
; ~
I i
i
j « .; «: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ I I
e ~ ~ ~ ~
?
rl
,-, x j ; i
~ ~_ «
x
« ..r-~ «; ~ I ~
I
s J 'J « ~ ,
# x: - «: 1
# ~ x ~ ,
# V; f ~ . ~ . . . . __
. ~
. -1 •:.: •- t ~~ ~ O Ol ~ M l0 r .
r
« ~ k W O if1 d' N d' W ~
« ~ ~ _ x. U
' # «
_
i` x 4Yi
FC O
V' M
ri 01
N '. N
M
~ V'
N p
f
« LL
x
f
# F #
x !s l # 1
x .. #
~
x -~ < x j ~
# ~'
~. I
~
x _
«
« :.~ .- - x
« _ _ x I
# - ." «
- ^ ,
a_, 2 ~
x
x i G .` x
« i ~+ .` « 1
j
# ..~ ~ x
x c _ _ < is
y
< x
.~
~
# L - ~ t
# "" .f _ x i
# :l :` i #
« 1 ~ _ x ~
x G r. ~t x
# _ a
i _. x
^
# "J
_
~ f
_
f ~ s
# t
# ._ # c :r tr .,.
# _ f - rl 1
V
f- x = 1 J~ 1 ~ I 1 f { 1 - ~ }
# K 1 4 J < 1 y
.. '
~ i # a « x r i \ ~ ~ ~ ~ . t~ .C . <! ti L .. ^, ,C ". 1 i~ tiv '~.. 7 .t ~ 'i ~ ~
:~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t r : ,
a
_ __.1 •
i
i
'V
M
rl
M
V'
O
~
M-
'
N
'V'
O
C> ~ 61 ~ N ~. N N r-I ~ d' ri M
CO N O r N tf1 Ol M tf1 N
' Ul N N - CO 61 r-I N r-I rI N
' O r-i ~f1 t!1 ~ r CA N r O Ol
~~ o r r ~n M ~n o ~r r c
i ~ ri ri
`~~ i
is ri N r r
~O ~ d' ~ O ~ M O ~ l9 d' l0 d' '
r
• r ~ ri <r w o ~o ri m ra
O ~D O ri ~ M O ~ ~ e-•i V' ~ .-i a0 - c
r-I r-I rl t[1 l0 d' M 01 r F
O :
,-1 o ui u1 .-1 r o .~ r ~n
N r-I ei r-I r-1 N _ N r•I r
i
i
V ~
I
~
~ i
;
I
~
+ ;
~ ~
~
!
i
I
~ ~
i
f
j 1 1 I
•
' i
~ I
j i
i ' '
i I
~
~ ! '
i
~ !
I '
r
:t
,i
ii
ij,
_
~ J C
C U ti
_
~ Y >.. n. ti' Y 7t l~ 1 >
4 .f cc ~ 1'~ O .O O ~. f- ~~ .n Y J' C T T - _ _C y _
~ l _
Y I t -' ~- 1 T J ~fl t ~ ~- 1 a h- 1 V, 1 y •y `~ 1 > V; t :!: 1 ~•- l
.
r
';i. l / "'> J t Lr J 1 J 1 J 1 - /- 1 1 - 1 1 1
_
• n, G.1 :.i J 1+ ~ J n.' ~ U J '~: ..: J ti _i 'U 1• Y t ...+ . L ~ 1: -- J- '\ '
x Z 1 '-+ 1 ~ t 7, 1 q 1 s 1 r 1 1 ¢ 1 r 1
. ti il.: ^-, S 1 X ~ Q ~ J ~L Z' 1. L 1 :L' ¢ LL y C`^ f LL r a
Y Y 'L ¢ C` S '\ U 'l :a. M S 'U J :r S. (~. L. D 2 ti r G } x 2 1: ± 1; '1+ !~ Z.. R. .'Y ~ 1
' 1 .?• 1 O U U :~ 1' Y („g y G
J '~ tf. C I-i - v U :..? C :.t. "'~ U
~
l '., O c ~ V` .-~ . x ti 2 ~ ,~ tt• .-, n 2 J' ~+
' ~ -i
a r . ~ J :(~ ~, ~ a ~ .•. ~ r i..... .~
' ,b .. .a.+ a ~
;~:{~ ' S ~ Z '\. -` .O 5 'V y ^: U ti i ... _. 1: -7 .L ^..C
~, n; t .~• :Y., N :1' w, W 'V !- G T !t; 3 O 7. 1. ~ .D 7 •ti 2 .-.:/: '
c~ _ ca _ _ _ r/ Y ._ o_ j. _„ _ r. _ aCt___ ~
~ R~ l 1 1 1 1 <' ~ l l 4 l l f 1 f ~ f ~ ! t
.
4 A ? A ! t / t t 4 f 7 +
-. _a.
+~
- ~
' v1 I~ ~ ri r 'cM ~ O Li 1 to ~ «l
~ rn r rn rn ~ ~ rn ~ m c
r ~n ~ ~ ~n ~ M r rn ~ ~.
ri N ~ M l~ d' rl l~ ~ V' l:
' N Gl O rl In M ~p N N N M
..
N N N O t0 cr
N
~~ ~
~~~I ~ ~ +
++
v
N
H
M M ~ O1 l~ O M
N V' O O O ~ O1 ~ C t31 O
N
i l!1 Ol M t[1 N - l~ C' rl r-~ l0
tp N N O l~ }.1 N M W d' O
.. N l0 .-1 N 61 N t~ N cp d' r
N to N W cN O ~' O 'V` N i ~
V' N ~ rl tl' ri N N r-{ rl
~
~
' I j ~ a +
I ~ ~ ~
' ~
~~ ~
! Q.,
~
,
~~
~+
i
+
(~
,
+j
_~i
~+
i
-
~`
~~
I
r
1-
i C
' S -
- -
i t ~l .
~ ~ J x .r ~-- L r
~ M
2 t W '~ O r^
+
.- c ? a ~ _ C c
~
J - .. a ~ ~
1
/
y .t_ .- G` .` J
1 f 1 1 1 r. C 1 ~-- .y a 1 l+ I J ~- +~ l - 1 1 1
S < r- J J C: -2 Z: ~ ~'\: -~ 1.
~
~ 1' ..+ l~ J i '~
1 Z
_ 1 :> Q i 3 S ! x 2 1 `-+ ~ t Y 1 !1 1 i - t
o Y 7 _~ a < < ~ -
a' :!; '1. n. J Z J ti Z J r„ , J . ~. J M1: .~: 7 rJ !1; 'J' ~- R r ~ rt t~ J 4 t
a.rv u
.7 < ~- t .. G 5_ f J ~-+ 1 a J `-+ i •- J~ t LL 1 r-+ f > ~.
v 1 ~ _-
l 1 X ,.~ ~ 1 1 1
~. Y 1 ~ J U. ='C {~ Y lL. J. .L S ~/: \ Vi Y '{ \ Y. Y
Y :f' 1 :n 4 `~1 "~ Z~ O 1 Y o Z R: C Y f~, •-J} 1i :r f R' ti a
J ti 'l' 4
J 1'
-+ T `~1
J c 1 ~- J C "" .-. Li '~^ V G "" ~ C r c V C ? C '.'~ c 7 7 J G - O - r
.
-.
~; a `. C •s, 6. r~ 1 ~ ~-. ~ N
O a ~..-. r~ a .+ s: n C R• 1 `• J' 1 a 7 ^ a
' J C :Y ti : ^ ... ~ ti O .0 ~.' 'l; 2 '' ^v L' .D Y, N J M f- ti Z +U 5_ .'L Q ^C ~: ti V ~. ,i, A L` .• S' .,
l
L .. 4: ~ i i i ~ i 4 < < < t L t t. ~ ~ ~ ~- --~
~ • ~ r r r r r r f f f f C ( ( r ."
a
i
f~ M M t` , N N ' II1 l0 W cf1
~ .-i rn o co r r co .-~ ,~ ~.
~ ,
M V' r-I N O CO CO b V' ~ ~
l0 ~O O rl V' O t!'1 O lD d' ~ lG
N M N r N ~ !` _ W I to M r1 r-I
N
07 ul 61 V~ ~M N N Cl cr ~ l^
rl ~M r-1 r~ N cr rl r1
.~~a'
M
tf1
~
-
N
d+
M -
~ -
mil'
CO
' Q~ OJ 1~ O N tD ~ O O ~ M r-i
.--1 N tD to
~ V' ~ 'C ~ 1f1 07 N to C
• ID O O ID - 00 O t'~ ~ ~ '-I N to ~ ~ ap
C l0 C' N - M N M 01 N N N
~D O CO 61 '. N Cl tf1 cN ~ ~ b CO N
' .-7
' M ~
~
~ I
~
I
I
,
~ M
i
~ N
,
i
I
~
~ V~
t b -
i
~ N
' M r{
I, ~
i ~ -
~ '~
i
~
. ~ ,
_,;r,yy
l
Y Y '
I U ~ 1
~ C
_ _
r Y• 1! :n a y
s c: 1t -r, ru ~ v - n r c -
J
'~ . 1 .~ Y 1= t 1 1 ~-- i 7. > n 1 .~ a •Y. 1 4 'X 1 / 6 3
, .
-' 1 ^-~ '.Ii 1 =
Q 1 ..; 1 t Y a 1 / ^~ .n i ~ f !~ 1 :Y t ~ 1 c ~- i
2 /: > ! ~
• 1 a_ 1 1 1 H 1 J { 't T- 1 J ..= i C.:.. 1 i• T ! ._, 1 1
_ J y >
m. 'J T 'C
Z' 7 ~L! ~ n; Y '1r 6 1' R. 2 R~ ~- cL~ cn ~i -~ V; ~ O; 2 ~ O ~ `
a 2
_
I~ :J _ .= ^ J O Y a U c ..:J _
.ti U c Y ti J G J O __ c Q "
~' .a.i J "' 1 ~ > 4 ri r~ - `.1. J' a: 7 0. + J L :(' r «+ r-
.~. ... -_
~~ 1; a .C _; .'U c •O Z ti ~ O .C x ti J .[ 5 !1` 2 .8 r. J y r ~. 2 ^~', ~.. 1 W L Y, rL 'J' ~ Y. v ;J O 7.
~
y
--- - -
t~ R a 't r~ ri Ia ~t °f ~( i ( ~l r t
a °
_.
c
o
0
`
~
n
~
,. ~
~
~
a i
~
w
~
M
n
~D
j
'
m
t
o
N
N ~ ~ ~ M O O :
N ~r1 to O ~~ M ~ M 1vMj CO d' M
~ ~ r ~ I ~ N 41 d' O r-I - Ol
ri ri l
u'1 It f tf1 ~ N rl O ~ l0 [~ N
i CO
~O 6l
N
r'1 to ri M r
i N
iA i
. N N
O O
CO
O ~
~, ,~+
CO
O O O N ri ~ _
O O O N ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~I ~ ~ 11'1 ~ M
N 1f1 Il•1 ~ ~ O O l~ '. l0
N N N ~ Ol M `
' O O O ~ O O tv1
~ ~ d'
"1 CT
N 1I1 61
to
' r..l r-I r-1 ~ l0 O N ~ l r ~
(
' '
~
~
i
it
I
II
I ~
~
~ ~~
~
~
~
i
t
',
I
'~
~
I
'
_
~ I
i
~ I ~
1
~
!
~
I
I
I
1 . I
~
~ i
i
1
- . ~.
"L
~ ~
.~
I
I-
1
~
, .-a
r
r
ti
s-+
1 y
' ..
.Y i- ~ .~ s ,
,y r a ~ :r az L' ~. ~ J - _ nom' v
~. ..~
a
- f. r r ~ r r a .r s r _ ,c
-
n o ~ - ~ c _ c•. a _ - ~ r _ -e Y
`+ 1 •1 1 _~ .J_' 1 .i. ~ n ~. v 1 L c t .C 1
f 1 '.al 'L '^ 1 ~~ t- 1 1
J w _ ..r
' ^ '~" 'V E yt 4 s-+ ~.
!`J 1 .-. ~y N '1.~ 3 C J: 2~ ~ J ti _ _ 1 J .t _
t
_ '~, . .P
J . G J 1 ! ~ 1 .
a- ? ^J 1 .- ? ti i ~ t =~ J 1 1 ~ '
~ 1 r.i T 1 _t
' Y ~ Q C -"' G !, / ' J
.'' ~ _ 4 1 ~ J f
ti ~.., C
=7 J ~ L .:L ~ ~ U ti J .p r l• V 1.
... ~
~ •
1 1 ~ r 1 = 1- 1 G r- t y > 0
y
.J <_ t 1- 1
y
`
• r ~ t
' v; c - .
~ 'x Y ~' 2) .
JJ l/•. Y T 1 ~~ Y " Y 4 "-^• 'y. ~ SL L: i ;:.
' G
~ -
. Y
~ ~ ~r
>'• tL ~ i Q .D Q
LL. ' ; ~ <' 't 1-
~ ~I a- z. nl c_ ~ ~ ti _: c s ~ s ~: s ~: s c v ~
- -
n ti s ti z v ~ c - v .
.
•~r
J o J` o ~, f+ ~ .-+ o .-. c :v p ~ a: tJ. o r •.n y. o c .~
„
z
~ c ~ ...+ ..~ :.) o a
,
tic z ~ Y .~ - v > ., a R; a ~ :~; ~ .. ,~ .-.
' J :~ u; 0 a
n ~
n
~ ~; ..
' ~ z ~ a s ~ ., '~: :
.
r. u! ti O~Z !1. OAT !~ _. .~W N ~7SCx, h 1~ ~S V ,eG
£ N 1 ~
, .
•...~:~c
"
. -.. ry a.CW M1. O.DY _ _ _
- _
.._- .~'
~
t.
r
N ~
~
l!'1
~
r-i
O ~
61
ri ~i
M
l'J
l0
L
O r - LI1 O 6l
~ N M ~ N r - r h
.-I ~D ri Ol O V' CO ~ M Gl Ol C'
rl O to N M r-I l0 ri Gl 61 C
O 01 N V' M r r d' N N C~
(` ~ N r ~ N Ol M M tf1 lf) t7') ~~
~~
~~
i. :
.I
i~
~I
.;...
~~
~ r r M rl LA CO M O
~
' M N to V7 ~N Ol lD M M M M
~! N O O O r CO l0 M r r r
'r C
Q Ol
r d' In N O~ O q If1 In lf1
(~ ~ tD CO tft M t11 r N to ~n
rn ~ ~ io c r r o 0 o c
~"
1~ .~
~
I r+ r+ r+ ~ ~ .-~
~~
`
~!
~~
~
~
I
I
~
i
~
i
I
f
!
I
I~ ~ i ~,
~1
-":~ ~
,~
II
~~
~I
~I
~'
~~
J~ ^_
J
J
1
:..1 r.
T
v
~ _ _ _
_- - / 1 1 Y
c 1 1
~ 1 t i Y G 1 -a t 1 S 1 >
1
- ~. r - :n i -_ _ .~:
_ ~ _ .~ T L -_ ^ _ ~
~
,r t ~ 1 ."~: 'f t ^~ J 1 T C 1 ~- 1 4 G 1 J 1 1 < 1 a i
~
J
• I 1 ;t J ti ~ R `~ J ~, : ~ J 'i' J 1 'L a .F !1 Y .f L .L: a J 1. ;> .: '\; ... ~ J R
U - .L .^.- ~ :~ ~ 1 ~ .L1 Q Y '.v '- ~ Y .LI Y ^ l.: ~ Y u: > .L! .Li > .1.
i .^ 1 rr 1 «. E 1 ,.,, ~ ti
^ ^ 1 J '-~ 1 a ,? _, 1 '._7 .+ i +r 4 ^-+ 1 ~~
~ 1 .+ J «r 1 ^-+ .
, i
~^ (1J c 2 :L T :tJ S- L 1. :L '~ Y sS 'L ~ LL of li. 1 Y 1
i 'L y LL Y LL
' ~: +1. ~- C 2 ti V] 1; > O S ^.t O ~ '\: 7 ^J. R ? 7" S ~'.+ 2 C T 1 P S' 'L ,f! S +u S 'f• 2
I
t~' C J
s C C C U a C J C F- C U C W '~' U C O 1' C (> G ~~ G L,} C F O I..k G L: ~ (,~ C ~: M1,; {,,,~
(
I S C .^a. n. N S C J. 1~ ti 1•. ~-1 t+ 'Y. ~G ~"' 'G !- .... 1~ +--1 A ~ 1-t A .C r. I+ .••. ,G .-.
•7 ~t ~ R V ~C ~ +1. T ~ ~'. :L' U ~G 1' R' r- L T. N 4 .-+ .f` fL" ~ O tY ti ~ Y .L .Y. ti J ~ ~ 1' 's ~ x. 1; Y .C 3' 'L
~ \ ,
~~ ~
M '
N
~' Q1 - I
~
~ N l0 (`')
N C' d' N
rl 61 ~p M
('1 !~ CA ~
'"'~ ~-1 r-I M
N
I
I
r-I
N
N
m
Gl
~-i
N
N
M
r
:~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
'~
N
N `~
N
N ~ M
er
V' ~
N
N .--I
N
N
~ fh ~ M M
N
~ r{
, to ul ~ N N ~7
~ ,d
r d'
~ N
~r
~
~
r
n
~
~
r
~
V' to ~ t~ O cr r1
~ ,-~ r{ M ,--i r-1
.
N
~ M M
[~
~O
l0
lD
l0
N
- ~
l0 `
t
'
r-I p
~ - ~ ~ I
j ~ ~
i ~
~ i ~
~ ~ ~
_~
r
Y
j 7
H U
_ Y
f
~ , ~ Y Y
1 Q 1 C f '[ Q v ' < 1 Y 0 J J ., 'f f.
-' J 'L' J Z J n, J ,~ J n: J G J 1' ' _
~ -• .
' ~: > Y W
o-1 ~ Y
J U Y .11 J
..
Y 1 i a J
r ~ ¢ at J
y .. ~ n, a J
'l ^y ~
J L _ !1: W
2 J J -1,
J «.
1 ..
J ~+
1 .
r
1
J ~--~
t .
ti
«+ ~
1
+- _,
1
`; r-t
1 ,
~-+ t
^
.-+
1 }
.-~
.-
1 C H i }
~
~
~
i _
, _ G S i ~ J 1
i
.. r-
U '
~ 2 ~ ~r _ ~ t .~ 2 x -. ~ -- r_. Y ti i v ^~ z ~; ~ o z 1 e r r n: ~
_
ti
1 J
:
~. L ~ C
~ C: !1; U
.- C :J 1.' U C .^. C U C C..' N U C ~ rr' U "'_ U G a y U :
J 'U U r z
LL 3 Li 1
G 'l~
I Y' ,t Y
'1: . L ~..
:Y ,D 7! ~
1' ..+ .C. r.,
~'
:
Y ~ "~ .L H r~ .--' J: H r~ a .C H
' ~ C -J ry e~ x S n.. _ .
r. .G r ,. .y ..c ~ ~.
V
H ,4 ... r+
.
.
1.
~ Z
ti
Y Jr x
ti
~~
~ ~
"ti
2 L :1;
'~.
ti L T'.
'V
Y .C T'
y 3
- ~ __ __. __. ~_--_ __--. __~_ __.._ _ - __. - _ _ ___ ... ~ _ - _.. ,
~ ~ ~
..~
i
i
I
I
f
'
O
j
~
to
~ ~
j
~
~
i
~
rl
~
!
~
i
r-I
M
~
~
,
~ ;
p
~
-
..
~
N ~ • . p j
Iv 0 ~ I
O
M O In ~ c`~'1 ~ ~ .
O ~
~ ~ 41 ~
~ M ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N N N O ~
t N C~
M .
r ~ ~
Ul Ca
M ~
~
r
~
M
Gl
1
i M N
,_:: ~~ ~ -
1
J
C
~
~
~
~
l~
~
T
~
p~
~
M
N
~
N
( ~ N C ~
M
M N
N ~
tf1
tIN1
~0
O1
O
N
O
sN
C
O ~ W l
r ~ ~ O
~ - ~ ~ . ~ M ~ M lfl
t` i ,_.I ri O ~ ~ N ~ ~ ` ` Cl
'.-I ~ ~ '~ '~ N l0 ul
` j
I
i
i
I
~ i
~
I f
i
1 I I
~ i ~ i ~ ~ ! I
~ ~ ~ ~ i r.
{
i
i
~
i
j i
I
I
j i
j
r
~
~ ~
ti
i
_
-
_
~
.
.1
I~
t . ~
t
4 r
`
1 ~.
1
G `
_
. _ ~ y ti
ry U ,ri .r .n v ^. .~ ~. ~.
~^ `r 'L :~ '~ 3 'U Y f7) S 1' ~ l J y r T -r zn
...
c - r r c c
' ' 1 .J vl tr •-• 1 1
1 ~ 1. .~i O X i ..?
: Y W % R. .
-. .-, _ r
^ _ J
~ z S "' 7 a 1 a.J 1 G / 4
- 1 1-
~ 1 :r, Y rt ! - 1 ~^. _. 1 C /
~G Y J '11 ._
_. .~ J 1. - r J
~r^ ti J Z J +l .•
- • y C
=~ J ~ ~- 1~ - 1 -. C d _ _ 7
i, < 1 ~.`J Y yJ f-
.-+ W Y W 1: Y 11 J ~ 1 ~ W 2~ d J
L' ^ ar u
: ` a '
.
.
-- 1 J rr 1 G x> 1 rr J .-1 1 ~' J ~-+ / ~ «+ 1 :~ U 2 1 .
d «+ 1 .
.a; M ~- 1 J .L
d r- 1 Y Y y
J .... 1
`~' '
~
~ Y M ti 2 t1
.-.
' 1, ^ .+
-' '\ 2 :f'~ ~. n• S 1' .~ nr ti U ~ V5 ti ~ S ti ,v_ ff S !V ~ ~ J O ~
~ 'l
:. C U
1, :.l .~
J
L C U 'U U C U n.' `7 C :) C ;r C 7 ~n, J C ~.• ;,} .^ ~ ^U U ~• J c C U
^..] .L z
~ J Y .G X '1: Y 1 .r 'V Y .L Y 'L• Y ,C' .L ~ : x .G Y. .ti ~ g ~ ._ 'V J .G :5., 'U U .O ~. 1: U .C Y ti ':' .C Y
, ~.. _ a ..
'
= -- _ -- - - - - -
~ ~ --
-- ~
. - -- -- - --
_
{ f • • • r r r r r ~ • t ~ r :
~ ~ ~ ~a
h l0 l~ M O to O N q L1
' M l0 Ol Ol q O Ol to [~ O
• x
rl l0 rl M u1 61 - 1~ '~c,' t` ~ t`
N l~ O q l~ M cp ~ q ~
t,7 _ d' Ol t~ M q 61 r-I Ol N
N r-I r-I M rl ,k' ~ to
r-I
i
~_;';f
I
~
~
q d
~
' N h ri ~' O r-1 l0 SV' N l~ - Ol
tf1 tf) q M O q O k, ~ N ~ O
N O to ri O I~ O
~ td ri N
N V' Q~ l0 V' C' q '~c,' !` M
N
N 01 1~ lf1 I~ ~ q yC ~ to
to N r-I r-I N (~ ~ M y.r r-I
N
. ~ -
- ~ ~. Q ~ i i
i
a
r
i
I H
1 p o
~ O
,U S r- r .r.
- ..~ C N
1` > 1
'V
~J
'~; 1; Y
4
~_ _ -1 1 ~.J .Y .'~ C' ? ~ 4 __
... ~ `
~ .L 1 ... 4+ 1 N_ Z 1 ^, 'l.~ 7 1 1 '1% 1 1 / I 1 '~:
'
_ i,.) -7 .~ ._ .~ 4 S t ^- r- J .r :t y ~ ~ _ ._. _~ - .-. at ^ C C "' L. C ~ ~~
f .!~ 1 .:[ ': 1 _ L' .r~ t J~ 1 11. ,_ 1 -z c f ~ a 1 _. t 'J _ i G 1
,
v. 1 a Z ., '1. 1 i' 'i _ _. J 1 J i _ J `~ Y 1 1 a 1, 'i~
_ v _
1 :a. ;_ <. f r? 3 f -: ~ ~: 1 '~ 'z. 1 ,. 1 Y J -~ 1 J ~--~ 1 1 ^, Y 1 1 /: i
.J
J n. G r+(n ti ti J N + "-~ ~ 2 ~C V7 '\' J C S J ~^" Z D o T J U Z 'L a t ti
~ ,.~ c .....!^ J Z -~ ~-+ - c J x -~ J c z o o c c ~ - ,: ;~ -~ J c c.r c _ J` Z c _- r_
' z tf` ~.• x Z .~+ .], x .•. 1- r `_ :f ~ fi
' 'L ~ t1. x < C ~-a ~.: 7 .r Z. .t; ~ r Y' r. !~ n+ S ~ Lr ~-•. S < C
~..
;fJ
~ ~
1'
T aD ."-.
ti
1i -+ !)
ti
{ f E
ti
:n q'. F,
'1,
la:.+ Y
.'~
~ .. ^:
1'
S .d :.
'~
Z:.L 2: u
G R; ~
ti
L 'S
1:
-. '.c
~
~, .. _ -
-__~ _. ....
~: ._::_ ~, - __ .- _ - _
-: f __~ -. .' _
_ ~ rte.: _ _ _ _
.__ _ _.._ _
._ _. ~ __
- - - _._ .-"
- . _
- _ _. °'._ - _
_
? " $ fi t ~ f t ~ t t t f t r _ t
~=
li ~
t ~
~~ ~
T M
~ _'•~
:
~p t0 M - O l0 d'
- d' CA O lI1 ri ~ C
r r1 h rl ~ ~O
~O 61 GO O ~-i lp
M
l M M cp ~i' M
N 00 l0 ', Ol 00
~ rl O O Q~
N l~ O h 01
~
i
, r
a r
~
I ~ r
~ ~ ~
,
i
i
i
"`''df~'
~¢¢I
i
M Ol
U7 - d'
M W
N M
CO .-1
M O
N r-i
q C9
CO G?
I~ N
N h
Lll C~
M l~ t0 N W l0
O O~ l0 ~ 1D O N
[~ 01 ~ r-1 Ol r~ O
N N lfl r-I 1~ M
m r t` o ~ c1
i
N
rl
M
j
~ i I
~ _ i
~ i j ~ ,
i
, I
i
~
i
!
1 ~ N h h
'~' '~ N M v ~ M ~' Y Y
_ r
r
- Z 1 c 1 LL~ a 1 1 a ! c a
~ 1 ~ 1 a
= 1 J i ^' 1 J
;ate ~ ~C, s~ ~ ~ .,r-o ~ ;,z~ ~ v y =: rTp .. ~- a _,-.. ..-.
- 'L 4 J ~
^ `-' a J 7, ~ 7 J "~' a J '1. :.J 6 _i '~ J~ J '~ .a: a J '\ ~ _t 2 X ~ J .Y J
^
~~ .-r x ~ .'i "Y 'sJ J Y :ai .L' C :J ^. 'Y .aJ 7 'J .a., ._ .aJ '~- X ~. ^. w '= .i. ~.: C LL
S -' - 1 L^ ^~ 1 1 ^~ 1 ~-+ 1 ~ L ~-+ 1 ~~ ~+ 1 ~- 0. ~+ 1 .a7 L -+
^ 1 1 ~ t ~^ ... 1 ~' r+
^ r
~
~? ^r ~ '~1 .L ~- - :1.. LL y CC t { _
LL.
^ r :L LL. "~'-' 1
LL ~L !1 ~: 1 t .1
LL
,
.. .1, n2 ti ~ ti S of ti `^ L N ^-2 ~l: ScT 'v Z;' ^.. O= ~ oT '\: S c i ^,.
_; ,^. C ? ~+ :.] c 'l, 1: U c :.J o {> c ~: .'\::.] ^- J; ry.' (.! C V C L O J G U O < C C.3 0 '/ C U C L C U C
cC O .C °-~ = Y n .-+ S n .-i X u. n .r T ~' '~ -a "O .-~ n .-1 2
' 2' .-i x
' x n ~-*
Y 't
fL ^
D :1: ~
N
Y
D 2
~.: O 2 ~ N ~ .C ~' ~U C x 1 ~ .O 1 :~ C S'- 1 ~ C Z 'V r .C 3; L Y .O Y, 1l ;
S ~O ;
~ .
: ..
_ ~,__ _ _ sit
_
_. -
_
- ~ ; - - _:: ¢~; -,
_F
. ~
~
_.
a
t' t r r t r r r r ~ e r ~ r
~.,~
N i
1
~ ~ i
i
I
i ,
~ ~
~
~
,
~ ~ , i
, i
i
i
M
N I
V' 1 ,
O i
p I
~ -
~ ,
- i ~ ~
t-+
' ~
.. ass r., ak??F3
-
~ K
M
~
~ '
1 i
i
r-I
~ i
-
~ i ~
~ I
i M
i ~
N
~ I I
r I I
i M ~ I ' ";
j
i
~
i
~ ,~
~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ t
H ~
' O ,
i
i
~4:
`
I
f ~
!
~ l-. .
',Q ~
~ ~I~
o u~
' _ SIC x
~ J
-,ti
y G 7
.` ^. 7.
s
Q _ _ ,
J 7 i
Y a
.1 .~ ~.: "n ~ I I
b~ ~V~ - I I
_ -. _ _ _ _
CITY' OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Off ice of City Manager
Council Letter No. 270
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf field
Council Members:
process
lan, Mr.
~; uviiu o~eiL, pre5iueliz aiiu cnairmaii oz Lne ~ ~ ri company, owners
f
i
Richfield will realize several benefits from the project. An
estimated 15 employees will be added to the payroll of -the company,
resulting in additional salaries of appr'bximately $$225,000. In-
creased tax revenue will also be generated by the project. Signifi-
cant L/H/N goodwill will also be realized.
o Lyndale Hardware, are
building exterior, inter
will be purchased from it
purchase from the• city po
Standard Oil properties.
on costs for the Lyndale
condemnation proceedings
purchase and renovation,
In recent weeks, several meetings have been held involving city
staff and the developer. Preliminary plans have been formulated and
the ingredients of a developer's agreement have been drafted. How-~
ever, final agreement has not yet been reached.
In accordance with the adopted L/H/N redevel
At the July 28, 1980 city counci
c
hearing. However, because negotiations have not been completed on
the developer's agreement, it would be appropriate to close the
proposing substantial improvements to the
or and parking lot area. The property
s present owners and the developers will also
rtions of the Betty Crocker Pie Shop and
In addition, the city will need to settle
Avenue right-of-way acquired last year in
The total cost of the project, including
will not exceed $1.5 million.
Res ctfully submitted,
61'1en erge
City Manager
Subject: Public Hearing, Concerning the Issuance of
Industrial Revenue Bonds for Renovation of
Lyndale Hardware Property
agreement will be presented.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 269
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf field
Council Members:
~~ ~ ~ ~~Q~
Subject: Presentation by Minnesota Symphonie
Winds for Sponsorship by the City
of Richfield
The Minnesota Symphonie Winds has made contact with
Council Member Collins concerning the possibility of sponsor-
ship by the City of Richfield. As a result, we have scheduled
a spot on the July 28, 1980 city council agenda for representa-
tives of the group to appear before the city council and
discuss their specific request.
KN/ej a
Respectfully submitted,
r,.
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
/~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Off ice of City Manager
Council Letter No. 268
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
~~ ~ ~~~
Council Members:
Subject: Discussion of Issues Pending Before the
Suburban Rate Authority
Council Member Luettinger has requested that an item be
scheduled on the July 28, 1980 city council agenda providing
for discussion of two of the issues now pending before the
Suburban Rate Authority. This council letter will briefly summ-
arize those issues for information of the council members who
have not been actively involved with the Suburban Rate Authority.
Council Members Luettinger and Collins represent the City of
Richfield on that organization, however, and the city attoreny
also serves as attorney to the SRA, and all of those persons
will be able to provide additional information regarding these
issues during the council's discussion of these matters.
The first issue now before the SRA relates to a rate filing
recently submitted by Northern States Power Company to the State
Public Service Commission, requesting a substantial rate increase
to cover the period from July 31, 1980 through July 31, 1981.
This rate proposa, submitted by NSP requests that certain categories
of users would receive increases greater than others. Historically,
the commercial and industrial users have been subsidizing other
power users, primarily residential uses. The NSP rate filing
proposes that each classification of utility users should bear
its own share of the total utility costs, and is proposing in
their current rate request to begin a three-year program of reallo-
cating costs, so that each system user would bear its proportionate
total cost. It appears likely that, if the PSC were to grant the
NSP rate increase, municipal users and residential users would
incur substantial rate increases. In addition, costs which the
city pays for its street lights would also be significantly in-
creased.
The Suburban Rate Authority normally does not enter into rate
design questions. However, in this instance, because municipal-
ities as a utility customer would be affected, the SRA has a
special interest in this matter. The impact on municipalities
is further complicated by the NSP proposal because many of the
major municipal electric utility costs are related to the pro -
vision of direct services, where the city could likely wind up
Council Letter No. 268 -2- July 28, 1980
passing on its costs for pumping of'water through the municipal
water supply system, street lighting, etc. back to its residents,
thus compounding the rate burden on residential properties. At
this time, the Suburban Rate Authority is merely grappling with
the question of whether it has a role in this issue, and, if so,
what that role should be.
rates of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Currently,
the joint powers agreement for the Suburban Rate Authority does not
include the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission as one of the
rates which shauld be studied by that body. However, municipali-
ties in the metropolitan area incur a.significant cost burden to
support the i~ietropolitan Waste Control Commission, and there
appears to be some question on the part of many municipalities
regarding the allocation of MWCC rates and charges, and how the
burden for support of the Nletropolitan Waste Control System should
be allocated. The SRA is beginning to look at monitoring their
costs, and to develop a recommendation for future council consid-
eration regarding expansion of the SRA authority to this area
through amendment of the joint powers agreement.
Both of these issues are placed on the July 28, 1980 city
council agenda for disucssion purposes only.
Respectfully submitted,
~e~.k ~, v
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: City Attorney
Y~
9
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 267
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Traffic Control Requests
At the July 14, 1980 city council meeting, the council
agenda item concerning traffic control requests-was deferred
until the July 28, 1980 council meeting. A few citizens called
city hall after that meeting and indicated that they had not
received their notifications until the day of the meeting and
were unable to attend... Notices to all the parties have been
sent again notifying them of the council consideration at the
July 28, 1980 city council meeting.
ramie
cations. A recent study has shown that the annual cost per 1000
vehicles of a stop sign on a street with a 35 mph operating spee
is $9600 in excess vehicle operating costs, 1400 hours in time
lost, 3800 gallons in extra fuel use, 8400 pounds of carbon mon-
oxide emissions, 600 pounds in hydrocarbon emissions, and 600
pounds in nitrogen oxide emissions. Noise pollution is also
generated by stop signs. Accident studies have shown no appre-
ciable difference on many streets before and afterinstallation
of stop signs and in some cases cause a false sense of security
for children using crosswalks.
If the council desires to install stop signs the following loca-
tions are suggested:
1. 64th Street and 12th Avenue and 65th Street and 12th
Avenue. Stop signs on 12th Avenue at 64th Street
(stopping 12th Avenue traffic). Stop sign on 65th
Street at 12th Avenue (stopping 65th Street traffic).
2. 72nd Street and Elliot Avenue and 72nd Street and
Chicago Avenue. Stop sign on 72nd Street at Elliot
Avenue (stopping 72nd Street traffic), stop sign at
Chicago Avenue and 72nd Street (stopping Chicago
Avenue traff ic)
Council Letter No. 267 -2-
July 28, 1980
3. 76th Street and Morgan Avenue. Stop sign at Newton
and 76th Street where the school pedestrian walk is
located.
4. 69th Street and Sheridan Avenue. Already a 2-way
stop, 69th Street is a collector designated street.
A 4-way stop sign is not justified.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
cc: Director of Community Development
City Engineer
Director of Public Safety
Director of Community Services
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 247
Agenda July 14, 1980
Deferred July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council D~embers
Subject: Traffic Control Requests
The Traffic Control Committee met recently to review several
pending traffic control requests. Following are the committee's
recommendations on these matters:
1. The northbound roadway on Lyndale Avenue narrows from
two lanes to one at 74th Street. Vaseli A. Duvleg,
7345 Lyndale Avenue, reports many incidents of cars
failing to merge, causing cars to hit the curb or his
tree, and the tree shows wear from the apparent col-
lisions. Mr. Duvleg has requested better signing of
this area. The Traffic Control Committee recommends
that a visual "Road Narrows" sign be installed and that
a pole with reflective tape be installed on the north-
east corner of the intersection.
2. Both residents who border the short deadend portion of
Bryant Avenue north of Oak Grove Boulevard signed a
petition requesting establishment of a "No Parking
Anytime" restriction. The petition listed two reasons
for this request: (1) their driveways are frequently
blocked by cars left by people visiting the Nature
Center; (2) there is a problem of loitering because
of the seclusion of the area. The committee agrees
with the petioners and recommends establishment of a
"NO Parking Anytime" restriction on this portion of
Bryant Avenue.
3. The council r
Avenue/Diagonal Boulevard intersection. Although this
intersection does not have a high accident record, it
has received a lot of attention over the past two years.
On August 28, 1978 and September 11, 1978, the council
passed resolutions placing "NO Parking Anytime" signs
on Cedar Avenue from Diagonal Blvd. south 30 feet and
on the north side of Diagonal Blvd. between Cedar Avenue
eauested that the committee review the in-
Council Letter No. 247 -2-
~~
July 14, 1980
ard18th Avenue and on the south side from Cedar Avenue
30 feet west. Signs were placed to relieve congestion
in the area. With the departure of Gopher Cab Company,
the "No Parking" signs were removed per council reso-
lution 6065, March 26, 19.79. Again the question of
congestion and visibility was raised. The committee
concluded that most of the problem would be alleviated
by restricting parking at the southwest quadrant of the
intersection. The committee recommends that "No Parkin
will incr
modating
apartment
ease visibility at tYr~ intersection while accom-
the on-street parking needs of the adjacent
building.
4. Betty Poehler, resident at 6525 Standish, requested
traffic control to prevent drivers from driving south
on Cedar (south of 66th Street) on the wrong side of the
road, believing that Cedar Avenue is an entrance ramp
to the freewav. The committee recommends that center
5. Betty Poehler, 6525 Standish, requested that the Traffic
Control Committee review the intersection of 66th Street
and Standish Avenue, with regard to the increased traffic
generated by the golf course. The entrance to the golf
course forms the fourth leg of the intersection causing
a conflict between cars which have had a "free" left
from 66th Street to Standish Avenue and cars proceeding
south on Standish into the golf course. To eliminate
this conflict the staff recommends that a 4-way stop
be installed. Also, the staff recommends that' a "No
Parking" zone be established on the south side of
66th Street from Longfellow Avenue to 24th Avenue to
allow traffic to flow more freely in the area of the
park and golf course.
6.
Captain Richardson received a complaint from a citizen
who suggested that we investigate what could be done to
relieve traffic congestion at the corner of Queen Avenue,
just north of 66th Street. He said that because the road
is narrow, even one lane of traffic has trouble getting
through. The committee recommends that "NO Parking Any-
time" signs be placed on the west side of Queen Avenue,
Council Letter No.
-3-
July 14, 1980
The following stop sign requests were submitted to the Traffic
Control Committee:
1. 64th Street and 12th Avenue and 65th Street and 12th Avenue.
A petition was received, signed by about one-half of the
residents abutting 12th Avenue from 64th Street to 66th
Street, which requested stop signs on 12th Avenue at
64th and 65th Streets. Traffic counts were taken on the
affected street. The counts indicated that the 4-way
stop sign warrants were not met. Should the council
find that some control is necessary, the committee sug-
gests that the council wait until. a comprehensive stop
sign plan is adopted before signing these intersections.
2. 72nd Street and Elliot Avenue, and 72nd Street and Chica
2'he neighborhood residents have petitioned for stop signs
at each of these intersections. Again, 4-way stop sign
warrants are not met. The committee recommends 2-way
stop signs, which would fit into the recommended compre-
hensive stop sign plan.
3. 76th Street and Morgan Avenue.;
The neighborhood petitioners requested stop signs on
76th Street at Morgan Avenue. The warrants for a 4-way
stop are not met. Stopping cars on 76th Street will
use 40,000 gallons of gas during a one year period.
The committee does not see sufficient justification for
this expense.
4. 69th Street and Sheridan Avenue.
The petitioners request stop signs on 69th Street at
Sheridan Avenue. The letter accompanying the petition
complained of accidents and large traffic volumes. The
attached police records do .not bear out the accident
claim, although signing according to a comprehensive
plan could help reduce the traffic volumes through this
intersection. Stop signs on 69th Street would make a
4-way stop, which is not warranted. The committee recom-
mends that action on this request also be delayed pending
adoption of a comprehensive stop sign plan.
The city staff is finalizing a recommendation on a comprehensive
stop sign plan which will be on the next council agenda. We feel a
need to try to put some order in our traffic system in light of a
number of confusing intersections that currently exist. With the
pressure for stop signs it seems in order to take this comprehensive
approach.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Alanager
March 10, 1980
blr. Marshall Rahen
Traffic Control Committee
Richfield City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
iVe, the undersigned, would like to request that the City of Richfield
install a NO PARKING ANYTIME sign at the dead end street that intersects
between 7140 Oak Grove Boulevard and 7200 Oak Grove Boulevard at
Bryant Avenue South. iNe are experiencing numerous situations where the
public is blocking our. driveways as they leave their cars for a walk
through 6Vood Lake Nature Center and also an ever increasing problem of
loitering because of the seclusion of the area. A NO PARKING ANYTIP•tE
sign should alleviate these problems. Thank you for your consideration
in this matter.
~~'' /
tin Dalmasso, 714C
r
Charles Sumner,
ove tsoulevara,
n
~If'~'~ac ~,
0 Oak Grove Boulev
eld, bin. 55423
Richfield, b1n. 55423
PETITIOid FOR LOCAL Ii-iPROVE.~iENT
City of Richfield, :~".in:~esota
~,
Petition No.
Dated Received
T0: The City Council of the City of Richfield, idinnesota.
We, tre u_nde~ signed, o:~-ners of the real property abutting ~`j-~ !~~/G f3~s~~t,~/ ~~
hereby petition that A Sto sign be -errectP..~1. at ~`"~ 11ND 1~~~ o~ l1~1, ~ti~
~.5~ ~}~,T1 X1'!'1, Co~.1 )1'#~ r"' !~-w~`/ S7'O/~ S'/~+~vS A~ E/~c}~ ANTE?sE~io.y
S? ~rature of Cr~;_.er Addz•ess
~/r
1. t~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ (_ z .a /
~' t
~ ~!-,?a 1.2'~d ~}t~c fir, %L~~ , 1`.~..f.•.
,/ ~ i
~~, ~~ ~ /I /!
b. ~ G~~ G s _ /.? .~~
__ ~
a. ~~~~ ~' S .
~ S - a ' ~(~.
9 • ~ s ~ v - ~a ~~- ~;~ ~
-a
l ~ ~
~ .~ 1 ~- - ~'~- =~` ~ ~-
\ ~ l oL ~fit~-
--~`~---
- ~ ~ •
~ ~ y ~- y - ~ y~~ ~ ~
;
13. .
I /' t ~~
1 n,~u i ~
l ~:
Exayined, c`ieci-:°d, =~r.;.i. i'oilr:d to `;~• ~ n pi•op~~z' fU2':n a d to :;e signed by th~~ require ntu:.~.~er
of GWi:t'.T'S of property affectc•A :~y the .::a=:ing of file iiprove:uer_t pctit:La:.ed :'or.
per cent
City Clerk
. ~~
~/ n~ n
l
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
City of Richfield, Minnesota
Petition No.
Dated Received
TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota.
We, the undersigned, owners of the real property abutting
her~t~y petition that such s
Signature of Ow?.~r Address '
2. -~ ~
~GL~ ~E~
~
~ c.,~ ~,' ~ ~~~~
~_,..~ <
~~ ~ LPL/-~--
L t,. -c ~. ..
-,
5•
__ ; ~ ,;,
~-~
Lo. ~ ~ ~ l2_ ~ 1 ~-~ ~~ .S q
,.
Li. -~~~ ~
6 ~~ / /Z ~-h ~e S
.,
13. ' ~ ~~ C ~ "1 ~- ~'~ - ~ ~,
,,
,,
yy ;~,~ r ~ ~~
Examined, checked,, and found to be in proper fora and to be signed by the required nw;:oer
of owners of property afzooted ~~y the :Waking of the improvement petitioned for.
per cent
City Clerk
/~2~C~/i~~~~~~ ~~~
n~ (; ~~ f ~ (~; --; _ --
PETITION FOR LGCAL II~L'RC~`T~"~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ L
City of Richfield, P~iinnesota
Ric~.+ ~,~ . w
pet~~ion ido.
Dated Recei~red
T0: The City Coarcil of the City of Richfield, Minnesota.
Tde, the undersibned, owners of the real property abutting
here,y petiticn that such street be inarove~: by
~ -
Signature of C~.r__er A_d3._ress
~ y ~/~ 6Y~
1
C ~ ._7 ~ ~' h !~
--'-
7• ~
~-
,~ - ~
~ ~ - ~
,~
~ ~ -~
~~
g.
10 . `~Z ~-- '~ U ~-- ~ c~ .lam--e
11. ~~ e ~1
t 1
~I' t~ ~e
~, =
12~ ~_rL.Lv ~~"~Ul`(.cL ~l J ~ l - ! 5 ``~`" s, ,l~.J~- ~ ~~ - I~ l L~ h-~--L~~ ~~- -
•
/
13. - .~ ~ .-~ ~- ~~_--~'-~ /l
- ~
~.,
~-
lit . ~ ~ a l ~ ~-;~ --~
. ~
~r-rte
15. ~ ~ ~ ~-:~ ~
16. ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _~- ~~ >
t
~;xa.mi~ed, chec'..ea., a.nd found to be in proper form ar.d to Ue sig:.od by the required nu..:oe~
of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement i;etition~~d for.
ner cent '
City Cler:.
PETITION ~~OR LOCAL I:-~'ROV~:."~~NT
City of Richfield, Minnesota
Petition No.
Dated Received
T0: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota.
We, the undersigned, owners of the real property abutting
hero~~;; petition~tnat. such street be inproveC: by /}% :~`-~~ .;,L•,•,.. .: ~ ~ '~.,'~~~~7'/,!/~~T -/'?"_~=a~~
~ `"`/~~7 ei /~-l ">-eN ; C~-~J ~/ cL /J_~.~ ~/. ~I ~/r~ .`->.~i ~~ya7~JTe€_ri//~///•.~~-~-, :~iiv ~+~i% ,lL'f
'T .. I l/ i~ ~.'''+A. ,i?i,-.~_.P • . /~.~s.%i~(lC ~~C ~~ ice'/ /~!r;• 7~~ i i!!'/J~t "7 :_l~C.~' ' ^~-~ i->i ~~ %' `/
-- - V ~
~
Signat~A.Ne of 0-w_~ -r Address
_. 7~ <
_ 3 . ~/ ""
.,
.
~
1 ~~ C `("~. z r
/
_ ~~
~~( /
~
•
/ ,_~
F. -
12.
13.
lk.
15• -
16.
17.
Examined, checked, and found to be in proper forty and to be signed by the req_ui=ed nw~.ber
of owners of property affected by the ~zaKing of tine improveL,ent petitioned ? or.
per cent
City Clerk
~~
~~
~~ .,
~ _.
~~
c ~~
-" '
,~.~~i ~1~~2~~~~~~~1
~ ~~~
_ i'~ -
_ _, ~,( i ,
c, - ~
~>
s ~ v,
'•~~
~.
~~ ~
q 3 ~ - E-~--~.t.,,,-~-~,L C-(~~
.. `f ( ~ v k
_ ,~~
~1~3 l7'~~~ ~~
,~ `_
--
,,~
,,
L
,.~ ~,
~, PETITICPI FOR LCCAI, Il~ic'?,CVF~ti;ENT
City of Richfield, P•4innesota
~..- ~
~'~
Petition No.
Dated Received
T0: The City Council of the City of 3ic'rfi::ld, Minnesota.
4Te the u~^.dersigned, owners cf the real property ab~attir~~ 'o"=.~.n ?nd ';:,~;tito:i .~vs~~.~as,
ho~ Crean 7th street ,an3 7 nth ;tras±
hereby petition that such streat ce iuurove~ ~y p?.acin=, a stao si:°;n at t:~a i nter~ev+..~ an
of 75th ~trset a.nd '~?or7an~~v~.~;~~', -,~,x; :~~~ ±,n~~-, ; ~, f~r~~„tr.a , '~-;,.,a, ~-a
~~~
g- ~-.rattu e cf C•~-~-~r ~ A:~dceGs --
11 ~>>..Lti.v~~_~~' -_.,i? `./Lip=~ ~?s`2 7 ~~..-~:~:~ ;~~--~ ~~
-
__~ ~-
3 • ` ~ (~ ict~ ~~ v/~ . :..-. ;`~ c~v~~ -Y---n
_ - .. I --
~ ~7 ~ ~ ^'-~' L!'~ ~J j-+t ; Vii`'<. :~-'' ~
8. `7~G~ ~ `~ } ~Z~} ' % ~ `,~ t',c; C'_ tt~ C~:J ~ ( ? `7 ~> .:~_~'! i,~,~ ~ ci ~~. y ~L L Jz
;. _ i
' 4L.~'`?.~~' ._. _
.~,
f
' ~~-
:~
-e
~~.
~ LJ
examined, cl.ecl:ecl, and sound to tie i.n proper form ~.ud to be sib.led b;/ the required :,tL~.;ier
Cif OWT1erS r?i 7?rOj'G'rty affectFd :;y j.~'... J:£L~ 1:,~ of t: c' r!:^rOVemen': pC't;t'_C;jE'Q' for.
ner cent _
City %1ert,
--. ,
~i;;rat,~zre of C~~+ns:c
~-~~ ~~~~-~~w
.~_ _..,,, -l
,, , , t,
----.
-~_~-
.- .__
_~_
3
/ r d I' , /LLy A
~~y ~(~'~ ~ f-t ~,
.~-, ~;_ 1
(~l
~.
'' h
t I / [(/
~~~''~--C~~Cl ~ ~ mil,
' J~~
:~1,_lrass _
' --~
(` is ,~, ~ ~ ~~i'i;~~l'+~~ r~~--~ ~i-: f~ tl_~~i ~t f'.~y
r-; - /
~1~~,
L,(~~
f ~~•a
f'-
A
~.~,
'~ ~- ~ c:~ '~ -env- ~-~-}'~._~ ~.-~.-~ -~~
~~
~ .., i
~'LG~-'~*?~c~ ~-r~~,c,~..~ .t7.~,-vz~:'`''~ j (ern.-J
V )
t _,
~ ~~ ' ` ,
~ ~.
~L^TC ~ /)'~tln c f kS :}-~ ~f •~
~~c~..~„ `it:.k..k iijc5.f` ~lx~; ~ ~ ~:•~: ~^-G %1~.~~- c~ .. •~ tL, 7Gi~ ~•/ ~.
c ~ I'
L;• to .~ f ~
l
-~ '
-,~ a • ~
PETITION FOR LCCnL II• rRO~l::i•L:lT
City of Richi i°ld, ~.inres~ta
'.
Y~,, Petitio:~ ito.
.~:, Dated F.ecei ve7
~.
' ~ ~ ~ T0: The City Council of the City of Rich°ield , t•1in__^.esota.
Fle, the undersigned, owners of the real prc_zrty Z~C•..'Ltti:?f~ t~o_ ran and Newton AvenLe,~~
between 7h~,h ~tr~e ~n ~~t~~ `'try P+
• ' here~;y petltlon triat such streeti oe iryprove~. oy uld.ain~ szop sz~ns on -~otn `;freer. ann
Moran A,~enue,, makin ; tha inters~c inn :i W ;y -tn~,
~. _
'.
~~w~.:~:
~fyar
j;.
A
t
~.., .
~~ .
r:
Examined, checked, and :cur:' tc t;~ in prcr~r fork a::d to Le :.i,; :ed t, the rc.iui_•c~ nu::.'c~r
of owners of property cii__~ted L;; tl:c i;i:i.,, of .,.... ir-~-ov_.:er.,, _:etitie^e~i :~r.
Sigrzture of Owt~~r Address
l • /Z .rte 7 ~ 3 `f 715 P ~ - ~ a
3 • tN ll~t ~
7 • ~,iC ~ l ~ ~-,.-t
8. ~ ~/
9. /jv 7~ ~-~~ ~ ~
L0. ~ D~ s~ L~.k-c~ O
~
n ,a.-..~ ~,
S o
L ~ / ~ d C v
~3•
6
~. ~
(v ~~ ~.~
1
1
per cent
City Clerk
~~a ,
~,-. f~~
~ ~
~ , ~ J
/}, ^~ ~?
~~ ~
1 ~ ,
~~ ~''
l~~rnl~~ LL's ~{~ ~.' ,~ ~?l /;~ L'`t'~ ~~ y'r~'--7~,(~~ Z ;--.~^
' ~~~- v~
l ~ ~
~. ~~ C I ~j ~.-~-C.-. /7~' '-~~-"~~Z C.:i L , I'~ CC, C~i~ ~, ate'
~n ~ ~,/ (.
~~- ~ ~`
`~;~ , ,
~.c~~ ~ mac'`-e'-ti /~~c. ~ ' -~ ~ •~ ,
~ ~~
- I ~
SEP wF~ 1979 ~~~.
~~-,~~ _ y-~ ~~
', DP'r! 421-? rcTiTiOPI FOR LOCAL ..'PR~~'~ici'E~vT
City of Rich;. ~~,~ :-'~.itl~ "' (~.
nil tc !~`.r Gi ~.-E'r
.o: The City Council of the City of P,ich~ield, '~'ir;nesot~:,.
lJe, t"e undersigned, o~vners of not less than ~i,"
-- - - --- - --- -- --- - ~et~~;eer,_
and _ _ _ __ _ __
by _installation of stop signs, sto_pQirg
at Sheridan Avenue.
- -- -- - --- ------------,---
Signatures of Owners House 'lo.
in fro^}sae of t"n re :. -)~,~--. ~*; _:~'it~inQ ,;,,
-i''ereb~; i~EJl~til^.'n ~~IOr ~'JVII Cy}....{. Jp ir-.~^,~-O~dp~
east-west traffic on 69th Street
i~:xz~~~X.~~~~~x~€x~XXX~~Xx~~~x~
~xarnined, checked, and found to be in proper f^rn' ar,d to be sieved ~~. the rec;uir`d number
of owners of property aifec~ed by tf;e making of the i~prover^ent petit`oned for.
per cent
-~i~y-~.?erk--- -
~"
~... ~~.~
~,s~
OFFICE OF CRIME AnJALYSIS
To: Capt. Richardson
From: Jean Davis
Date: 12-19-79
Re: Accident Analysis - 69th & Sheridan, 67th & Russell/Sheridan
1979 1978 1977 1976 TOTAL
69th & Sheridan 2 1 0 0 3
67th & Russell 0 0 0 0 0
67th & Sheridan 1 1 0 0 2
Analysis of 69th ~ Sheridan - 3
January - 0 Sunday - 0 0700 - 1500 - 0
February - 0 Monday - 0 1500 - 2300 - 2
March - 0 Tuesday - 0 2300 - 0700 - 1
April - 0 Wednesday - 1
May - 0 Thursday - 2
June - 0 Friday - 0
July - 0 Saturday - 0
August - 0
September - 1,(1979), 1,(1978)
October - 0
November - 1,(1979)
December -
Bather: Road Surface: Number of Vehicles:
Clear - 1 Dry - 2 Two - 3
Cloudy - 2 Ice Snow Packed - 1
Contributin g Factors: Severity of Accident:
No Improper Driving - 2 P.I. - 1
Inattentive - 2 P.D. - 2
Failure To Yield Right of 4Jay - 1
Speed - 1
Improper Passing - 1
O '=
t . ; O O ~ , 1 • x• . ~ .>._-...~• Q j C ~ P . i' S t, 1. r 1 i • ~;
• - O ~ . 1 O Y. .M«~. - ' OU C, - ~' a C F t V ~ > `.i ~. r.,l ;~. ~~ w ..
-~/ is -. ~a oN Oo G -- n0 - - .,,° -. _ °o•--=-- _' ---Q --~- 1 Y. ...
-~~'+.,, i.. ~l,.r i>.. ~a .~ ~ .'w«„ '`O -.• •N O _. _~• ,~ __o ,'_c=..-_OQ~ • _~~- - D. __•_U/'. .. _..
_a .at ~1 ~ t. ~ •--' y 'i (- 00 -90 00_ - .0 _.-p_. U 00.-D_-_O --OD 06, !:1(~ w... -
f .'S'.4 i > 4 - '7 ~L w .onr O - ~O O ~( C. _• ._ _ - ~. ~~~ v .•
.tea 7 • ? w •w a,n W i .Q_ 0p O ••--b_ _ _. - )s •o )
' `'~': ~ i:f t ° ~ i ~ •' ~ • i -iT o - _ o ° - ~ - ~ _ °" - _ - - o o --. a '~
zl ~~, w w.•ay
~ .1 ~k, T it ... ~. ~ ~ ".'-J ~ O • • - .-.O _ _~ 00 -s _ _ Orn _ •- G 1 w U».
;;a`1.~3 ~ ~ as rp .) ~ ~~ 1'O •~' • - r- -00 _.--O~ - ~ -~0-_• ~V+ w..~v, .
_l !" I..M O ~S
1.. ~1 i'r•t .. w .. ri _. 00 - _ -.^ ° ' O-,-~_,O. _. G _ O _1] .~-D -__ _ ..O C':i.
,p^ • ~ w w.n• Op ,OO -pp • ~ OaO~ 6 - p-O - • -. • __. ~Ot • O r .
a3 '11~,* ~ ') ' l _ w .• ~~ - _ 00 ~ ~ O D-. ~ • • _. 00 ~ • O p ___- _. O • rn ~~ w •c..v
~itxrt ~~•R~, f - w•. ~'} ; i~ Cy `• __.oU 00 •T _O _-:..--_"•_Ap _____-op _ rl/, w.u.).r
-• 4:fa•~G 2 _ -.. w •no.-. C 00 ~. _ _- 4 .- n C! ~--_Y - • O p, • • • -O _ -~ j.-.~ M ..
1 ~` '~ sue' ~ )1 .- _. , '---u-_..d__~_ ~_--O`~~t` .w .rza. • _
.r.i~~, f4. ,T;. jr = hmn.v ~ --~ 00 ~ ~~ )) .~~0 --~•-QO._i =.ir'O~jf w..~-,.
a v.~X v )~ a- 5 [_. w) '.• ~00' o i ..~ :.,~•X ~,; • _' _ 00 • 't'f
.i11 -o w n.w I xo•1 •~ ~ ( ~'•. °~~~.~_ JI •~ ~-•~ _~• _. O___ y
a 7 F• t I ~ it - ~ O N.~,_ • O N N ~ X ~y t!~' • ~.. •-- : a 1 ~ I1~ w .~.. .
4`~ra ~• lsr ~r r• j ..r ~ o __ - ' a - -- ° °-. o`...• ~...~., -- -- ~y F~ w ..... ,
Y r~?~a. 1.. ) " w .•.a . ~~~. ~_- • O ~,- ~ A J• _ ~'p-~ -~r G~ ~ X" /~ O ~ fiI v .~..
I~~ ~~ ~,. e ~ ~ wa» ~ .. v--N ~~ _'n-_..~ _.O_,.~__~O'OQ- XC O.. ONO 00 - _N O O i~f~ w~..
.:.~ j tlJJZ ~'t, :i,.,..J ._ w ).w.. 1 O ~ ~' o - ~~ • r' U •- J 1 ~ O __ • • • • O' _- 1 w .....»
a.lat°~4" ,J :.')) n. ...,.. O ah R ''_-_- ~-+, ~~~ G • • • o O O b O • O _ II
,..e~,ir •. --- • •-- w .
+~ ~ ,
}}pc,t ._ # VIi~O 1 - ~ i L a '! ~ ,
2 -C~
7.µ '°~~; ~N W'_. ^'.J~ ... re .~ I ~ _.-...-..y.._«~ J r ~'" :/ Ili: (' II r• .,
F' i1, o
Y'- v 3 noa}.~ M« ~ Ov o. I • a • t ~ ~ i ~ vi 1 I,II _11, 'i ,.. ,.
>;~ '' ~° ~u:Fr°- ~~ c oo c~ •-t t { 1 " - ~ I:,, i n i~ r...,...,
1 1 1 1 r.., d' ~' _. `- ~~.. ~ t '~ ~r y .~ iii Ifs. ";
. . oN x> ~ w.„ o _ ( o i ._ ! ...t .` ` i X11
'.~., - r... _ "~ t ~ .. _ ^ _o o ~ ~` (' .' J~.~o T ~ • .-__ (; -_ " ^~ o~lJ - 0 5 \;` ~ ~ i~ y,. T..'
_ r. .. ;t _ 1 (~ ( -^ - c'JO o I ~ is c\ il~ . ...
.-
, I ~ :ti ( { `
C ° ~ G I. G o
,.• .. r..,,r.,a. _ ~ o o ,
° f ° ~i ..
0
c, _
,~. ~ S ~: ; ,.. ... 1 - ~ { oo e o _ o-o._ o_ ~JO .°-- -D---- °o_c~Y~ JI
t.' e. ~ fn w o o ~ o ° - - --- w ..
~I ~S )~ ~ i .V .. ' _ _ _ ,o .: I - -~ 111 _=.w " . ! -...._ -,_G -1 ~I r. ...
~,.. ° . 1• 1 G o e
,'>i~ r LL - ~ ..:.-o - _.. _ t _ _ o is
1 °~
O _ G __~.
.
0
. .~ ~ -a- j --^ _~o_ t _.o_.
1 i+`Cf •, ~ - - Y a.n.~r., -_----- __, D-_._.. CYI- -. O _ _ O _. o -_!. - ^' --p- I r. ,-. +-•
err •t a j -_.O ~I;w~ O __~O .-~.9 -... ~'_~~ _C;C _..{O- ~=_ 60_' -C .o ...
°'-~,~Sa s9 , a r[ w .,..v Oo 0 0 _ __-- c G t ' " C s j C~ .
~'at~.lrs-n/i~~ -~ a.. .. ~ __oc__ ! I o --OO_- _ I _oo =~- ~ --: on_^--{= c°: N ... .. .,
__
ra>1 ~ .c '',~ .1 s+ .a.,.. oG --'. -° o _ _o = - o - ~~o_ _ - oo- o' of i .....
~~~~;,y~ o . a+. ~ _ !x ~N --' -_.a o . °oo r_i~ -Q ,I.__t - I _ -_ o~ ( r. .l w ,.,:..,
{ i~~ t ~r ~ :ar .r,or ~ f ..O __-_-__- O O .._G ~ _a~ ~ -i -G__. ~J,~ r. ..
t y C. Z ~ _~- -.-.-_A O -_ .-- _ ^ .- O~7 -~__L`'• ' I 1,
a'-" ~ `= X ...~., 1 __ ,_ R- o._ - _ -__ "' o d I I c: =_-__n : _- '-' ~, - o c --• i w ,.... L.
.i y _j~ gy n. - o S O -{ II
~f''f .- J~ _ - a,. ra... ! .1~ Ivy j/:- _ 1 __.••^~.,. ~~,_ __a .--_1 c~ ~°__n 0- '~ ,CO .«..-~ '' w :o««
/~ ~ I
vr~. ~,~~ a' r..a.a-. ~.~cx o° ~! ,~Q o. -o - -- -- d~---o,~ ---~~V~i., .-........
~`y; `S .i~~~ r w... ~iiL -a v, ; •x O:~~r ~~~~ ry,~-! -= t -O - !T C 1~ •. _..o.
L G ~~v _>:
_V~ y V,4 I:~ Y J W Q ` .I'V ~ ~ ~_ ~ .-.. _._.( __r~= G_1-_t `I~ N
i.. ~Yt7'.~r~ t ~' .: ,. ..,., .~.aCC_ t ~ f ( •o ~ ~ `)_~../ _ _- = oo _ o ~ I ......
'{Y7k~~lt r w ..o.. Y x+a. X ~ -.! _t- -p ~ '-O- -~~~~~ r. ,..w
'fit-~f_',_ ~ a.. w.w. ~ ~_'-"..`'. •1 uP 1 t~ "t_ ~_ _ O__~. ~j w.~.
1 . ~'~• " 1
f4.#,.~ ~K ~ ar .._. 1- aS' .I M.--o~..._..... rC -moo- ~ -';--:' -I- -~~ Lf,/~~--\ r•_~-
rr~_~.,,,Y7) _ ~ a+,a.. ~ ~-;~~_ - I _-d _- It -~o O'-p° -~ ~x-,.` o~ - '~ Ii~ w M -
, .,, p r~ .•...
~ , • .- ~ _ ~, ~ y. ~. .gyp ~ -.... --' --- ...?. _ R _.- ~ c o l . - r =-_ of ( r' ...
~,1'-f~ae 7~~.:: ~. r. - - a+ .«.r. ~'_ _-. JJ -_~~ - _ . o _ w ! _ _ p _ - o Cj.__ of
S 'f ~tn. I # a. aw• o _._.... CO._00 .•..~ -~0--~ ~ .-. G ..~ OO 1
L-, ~ Y _ -- -- I -- 1 .. ., ..
1 f: ~ w.,a. ~ _° `- ,.1. oo, n uJ._ ~((C__ c°---~ °~ xcOO .°G °o- -ar o_G /fl~ w....
Y~j~~~~ r i,r ~ ~ w nr.. _ QO 1`,x0 J` -11-__•-- n=_~,.. ` ~ I` -~/ - FY ~ i j;l~ w ..r•
' ~ 4y +. ~` ~ . -~ ~ ~ w •n.ar ° 11 O - - ~+~ ~` ~'~^t , II 1 __ ! ~~ II 1tii w ~.,.
,~i..~. 1 r f .. , ... }i s....... ~ oo .. i I ~ cl'--1--- - ~~- `~ ~--1 y i . ~ o o - M I - o ~ - ~ ........
t~•/,3 ~ , `. ......~ - r~ "' 1 «--.... ',~~ u., 3"l~ocf ix.o o no '.i ='oc-_ -{.. - .....>,.
~11~7~y t' i ......,. _ _ _o c : - --- ~r-- -- ~ G I ', ~ c e -o - t c ~1 .....
_o -- .1~ ___.. ,
~. J
•
ar; ~Yi`.~ ~` f 1 r'• r rt r i r: i t i ' i ~ i _. ..
y' ~ a ~~. ~ ~ • • • • • • • • • -• • • t ,~
~k,.~ 1
rf 3',:'
l:
~f•~ _
`w •a.:'
.r
E"? ~ o c ~G o• ~ o G
r
N
J ^ ~- N
• ~ -~
~3 r-
+
H
~ r :: N ~ ~r, g '~,
~'~ ~ ~ tUi ti ~'. ~ '~ ' ~ ^~ •
U~] ~ ~ O
.
'V ti- GH tn•-' ENO-~1 ~ v
:~ ~ v
v n
v O ,=
O r a ~
:; '
? tr. c
'-f
~
~~••ir'7
' p C G
o ~ ~
tr
t°
G
y ^ o
,
~
.
+: ~ .
,
,
~, ~
'f' °
~~
-, J
1,=
• Sex
+tV, ~~
r ~. • ;b._ . r O _ _ ..
- E..~E~a~.~ rb.GONH
'~[,~ ,,i ~ ~ C Y / to CD / ~ ~ 'c •~. .NG
~_ V .W
:~:
- ~ C u
u H~° O 1 "~ - O
T
[: u
'
C
'
0 yl 0
O
~ O
t.
Lf
,^
..
W '-' t
u
C. T C O ° N C
°
i
J . O r
.
v,
r. ,., Y _
c r ~
N ~ _ G r
~ .7 '
• _
..
.-. j N
N "d U G•C
4 C:. O ~ ^
tG •' in ^ ' ~
O ~_
~
i c
i
° .L C
m o m >.
r ~ N
.°.. c U2 r ~ ._, c ~
t G `"' G ~ G
.
~ ^~
..~ ..
; ,-
~ ~, v
.-Ci O w V ~ ~" ~ J p C ~ s ....
G V O J~
O J .
O G
~ T. °
C'i ~ ~ -.
_ / V
C C
~
~
° O v ~
O
-~ '.
~ 1
N ~ '`' ~ ~ C i ..-.
~ GV V u: ~ 'c3 CO ~ 1 .i i
L:
1
r
C~ H ...+ O / ~ ~ ~ .O+ ..C. G ..C.
'.~ 1
.
~
.. ~ ~ _~ o G
d ° to 3.
~ .- ca o .
.
•
..
_
~ N C C
u°
n u ut N
t N O 'C _~ O of
v
C' =i u O
`C '
t'
~ F. o 1
C
~'S
~ : "'!", a °' A °
~
Y '-' M y
)
. ,. ~ m C ~
,
n
~,
a c
~ d °... ~
C
cl
a °
~
~> ~ ~, o ~ H
.~ . ` ~
~ °
o
.--.
•
.
1 ~ . .
i ~ d : mac. "_ .S ~ A c: r '~
'~
~ °
of
>
N • ~
~ ~ `1 ~= ~ ~ v O •~
. 1 C '
~
O ~
.. I. 1 ~ vu U C al ~ ..- v r. ~ C 3, ..^. ~
~K' ~ GA
m v c c
~p r O
., ~ i3 t0 V u ni C d l d O C ,,., v C T ~;
'
, ~ (~
'
'J ' C C a
~ :n :/:
3X~ i,•.
:
~r (/] ~
O H
C" V J ii n <
G
M
_ `~
..d ; .
cr; ti 0
~, m
N ~ w O O
G c °
O 1 3. C d tC ~ G `n ~ ". G ,.. ul
7 v u: ,. d ~
C ^ tC O C
r C' °
Y
u oy
C ~ i L
i %:
~, ul
ul
~; ~ LG to C
: u .- ~C ^-! ~-.
V i '.'
~
`
. .
-
.
r. .a ti v G p e = 'y' ~•
~ a
'
c
V i/i .. c u
-• C
ti K y c' v. LC
u, m = ~ ...-.'s
G y = O V ._
J:
"
C c: .7 n V p
G L~ i L r:
r
t; ~
ti on >. H v U: :: '7 3
A o ~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 266
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating To Hours of
Business for Unattended Car Washes. First
Reading.
At the July 14, 1980 city council meeting, the city council
reviewed the license renewal request of the Tip Top Car Wash. At
that same time, the council reviewed some of the problems concern-
ing the hours that the car wash was open for business.
the request of
A copy of the ordinance amendment is attached for council
review and has been scheduled for first reading consideration at
the July 28, 1980 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ ej a
t~
+/Yt
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER VI
SECTION 6.04 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RELATING
TO AUTOMOBILE 6aASHING ESTABLISHl~1ENTS
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter VI, Section 6.04 of the Ordinance Code of the
City of Richfield defining the regulations of automobile
washing establishments as enumerated in Subd. 12, subpar-
agraph (2) is hereby amended in the following respect:
(2) If the business is contiguous to a residential zoned area
and no one is in attendance, the business shall be closed
between the hours of 10:00 p.m. 02:00 midnigh~ and 6:00
a.m. the following day.
Proposed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
28th day of July, 1950.
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER VI
SECTION 6.04 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD RELATING
TO AUTOMOBILE ~9ASHING ESTABLISHP~?ENTS
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter VI, Section 6.04 of the Ordinance Code of the
City of Richfield relating to the licensing and regulation
of automobile washing establishments is amended by amending
subdivision 12, paragraph (2) thereof to read as follows:
"(2) If no one is in attendance, the business shall be
closed (a) between the hours of 10:p0 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of
the following day in the case of any such business which is
abutting upon or within 100 feet of a residential zoned area
and (b) between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m. of
the following day in all other cases." ____.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this day of 1980.
Donald Priebe, P~ayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
ti
r
!Q~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 265
Agenda July.28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Regarding Emergency Ambulance
Service in the City of Richfield
During the March 10, 1980 city council meeting, there was an
informal discussion regarding a license application by the Hennepin
County Medical Center to the Minnesota Department of Health to ex-
tend their emergency ambulance service to a number of suburban commun-
ities, including the City of Richfield. During this discussion, the
council reaffirmed its previous position to both support and en-
courage the expansion of the Hennepin County ambulance service to
the City of Richfield.
Following the March 10, 1980 discussion, the public safety dir-
ector, as instructed by the city council, appeared at the licensure
hearing and introduced testimony on behalf of Richfield's support of
the license requested by the Hennepin County Medical Center, to pro-
vide ambulance service to Richfield. Following that hearing, we were
given to believe that the license request by the Hennepin County
Medical Center was supported by the hearing board, and that a recomm-
endation for approval of the license application was to be forwarded
to the State Commissioner of Health. Thi,~ past week, we have been
informed that license approval was granted for Hennepin County to
work in the western suburban area, primarily in St. Louis Park and
Eden Prairie, but that action was deferred on the request to service
Richfield. We have also been informed that another hearing has been
scheduled by the Metropolitan Health Board to consider an application
by a private ambulance service for licensure to operate in the cities,
of Bloomington and Richfield, as well as to operate an ambulance base
at the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airport.
For the past four years, the city council has attempted to en-
courage the expansion of Hennepin County ambulance service to the
City of Richfield. Apparently, the provision of emergency ambulance
service in our community is an extremely competitive situation. It
is my personal opinion, and an opinion historically shared by the
Richfield City Council, that it is eminently unfair for the taxpay-
ers of our community to be subsidizing a county ambulance system
without realizing any direct benefit from that tax support.
Council Letter No. 265 -2- July 28, 1980
At this particular point the county is both willing and appar-
ently able to extend their ambulance service to our community. How-
ever, the licensure process, and the related administrative require-
ments for public hearings, seem to be delaying this service expansion.
I do not mean to imply that the private vendor seeking to continue to
service the City of Richfield has been unable to provide emergency
ambulance service in a relatively acceptable manner, but the cost to
our citizens. who are users of this service is generally substantially
higher than the comparable cost for Hennepin County ambulance service.
Additionally, all of our taxpayers are already contributing to the
financial support for the operation of the county service. Quite
simply, the way the system presently works would seem to create a
situation where Richfield taxpayers are subsidizing ambulance service
to other selected areas of Hennepin County without realizing a direct
local benefit.
I think that we should continue to request our equal share of the
ambulance service currently provided by the Hennepin County Medical
Center, and support the medical center's attempts to expand this ser-
vice into our city. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Director
of Public Safety, in which I concur, that the city council give favor-
able consideration to the attached resolution to be introduced into
testimony at the next scheduled public hearing regarding this matter,
on August 13, 1980. The deadline for submission of comments to the
Metropolitan Health Board for introduction at this hearing is August 6,
1980. I would also recommend that the Director of Public Safety be
authorized to attend the hearing on behalf of the city council and
again represent the interests of the city in this matter.
Because of the difficulty we seem to be having in resolving, this
matter, and because of the apparent adverse affect on our community
and our taxpayers ~of the existing system of allocation of emergency
ambulance resources in Hennepin County, I would also like to suggest
that the city council give consideration to authorizing the city
attorney's office to explore the possibilities of initiating an action
in this matter on behalf of our citizens. I believe it is time that
this matter be brought to a conclusion. r,
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: City Attorney
Public Safety Director
~~
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE
REQUEST FOR AN EMERGENCY AMBULADTCE BASE STATION
TO SERVICE THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has a vital interest in
availability and economic provision of ambulance services
to the residents of the City of Richfield, and
WHEREAS, the taxpayers of the City of Richfield are presently
providing financial support for the many operations of
the Hennepin County Medical Centex, and
[•VHEREAS, the Richfield City Council in regular session
on September 27, 1976; August 8, 1977; and March 10, 1980,
has formally initiated requests far the extension of exist-
ing Hennepin County ambulance service to the City of Richfield,
and
WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council has examined the
currently pending application for the establishment of an
emergency ambulance base station within the City of Richfield
by the Hennepin County Medical Center, and
WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council did enter testimony
in support of such license at the public hearing conducted by
the Metropolitan Health Board on March 19, 1980, and
WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council has been informed that
another public hearing shall be conducted by the Metropolitan
Health Board to consider a license application by the Smith
Ambulance Service to continue, as a private vendor, their pro-
vision of emergency ambulance service to the City of Richfield,
and
WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council has set a high priority
for the delivery of quality emergency, medical assistance to the
citizens of the city and desires to assure that the service is
provided at the maximum cost benefit to all citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the city council of the
City of Richfield tlas hereby adopted a resolution of support for
the pending license application of the Hennepin County Medical
Center to provide an emergency ambulance base station to service
the citizens of Richfield, and does hereby request that the
Metropolitan Health Board reject the pending license application
by the Smith Ambulance Company to provide emergency ambulance
service to the City of Richfield. This resolution is consistent
with the official position taken by the city over the past four
years and does not negatively reflect upon the quality of service
provided by the Smith Ambulance Company, but rather recognizes
the economic disadvantage to the taxpayers of the community in
supporting a county ambulance system while at the same time
utilizing the services .of a private vendor and thereby increasing
Resolution No.
continued
the cost of such services to the citizens who must use this
vital emergency medical service.
Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield, this
28th day of July, 1980.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
/3
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of. City Manager
Council Letter No. 264
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Nlayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Proposed Metropolitan Council Plan Amendment
Guidelines
The Metropolitan council has set a public hearing for July 31,
1980, for the purpose of soliciting public input to a set of proposed
plan amendment guidelines. The 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act
does not clearly address the issue of how comprehensive plan amend-
ments are to be made, once a community's comprehensive plan is adopted.
In response to this issue, the Metropolitan Council has drafted a
set of guidelines. The attempt by the council to clarify the issue
is a desirable one from the standpoint of all municipalities preparing
comprehensive plans; however, the proposed guidelines potentially
present some problem for the City of Richfield.
On July 14, Community Development Director, Dennis Kraft and
Associate Planner, Rick Jopke attended a work session set up by the
Metropolitan Council's staff for the purpose of reviewing these
guidelines. Several communities expressed concern over the potential
impact of the guidelines and at the conclusion of the meeting it was
decided that an attempt would be made to push the public hearing
Sequent to this meeting a deci
ing as scheduled and to allow
public comment until September
but that items that are of only local impact, or possibly impactir
Richfield and just one adjacent municipality should be handled at
the local level, rather than at the metropolitan level.
ce xicnrie
One major concern is that the proposed guidelines, overall,
appear to be too encompassing. There is frequent reference to "any
change in the land use plan," with a number of additional modifying
ome support from the Metropolitan Council staff,
recognize that they could be virtually inundated
land use plan amendments.
Another potential
dea also
who ap-
with re-
presently drafted, up to 150 days would be allowed for the various
public hearings to be held and for communities and others to conunent~
on plan amendments. chile this might be an appropriate period of
time for a plan amendment which would be of real regional significance,
it appears that this amount of time, when added to all of the other
procedures and guidelines that have to be met could be a definite
deterrent to a city seeking to attract some desirable types of re-
development activity, if such depended upon a plan amendment.
Council Letter NO. 264 -2-
July 28, 1980
is geographically a relatively small community, a major portion of
the community would be included by this regulation. Added to this is
another requirement that indicates that these regulations will also
apply to various categories of "airport influence areas". This area
of influence would extend for a distance of four miles from the cen-
ter of the airport. Plotting this on a map, it was discovered that
this would include all of Richfield east of I-35W and would, in fact,
include an additional area of the city 1,000 to 1,500 feet west of
I-35W. There are other requirements that would include those areas
arterials, and another requirement whicr. would include all of the
lands located within a one-half mile radius of freeway interchanges.
Once all of these requirements are plotted on a map, it becomes ap-
parent that only a very small portion of the City of Richfield would
ment, and that any amendment to the plan affecting almost any part of
Richfield would be subject to the review process described in the
guidelines.
The staff also has a major concern relative to the potential
adverse impact that this amendment procedure would have on the right
of local determination, or home rule, for the city.
It is our recommendation that the proposed amendment procedures
be amended so as to redefine those land use plan changes which are of
genuine regional significance. Comments made. at the July 14 meeting,
seemed to indicate that the Metropolitan Council did not want to
interject itself in the local decision-making process, and would be
willing to consider amendments to this procedure so as to be able to
obtain that objective.
Another possible guideline modification which would be in Rich-
field's best interest would be to provide for some sort of adminis-
received s
peared to
quests for
Council Letter No. 264 -3-
,Tuly 28, 1980
to the Metropolitan Council's guidelines for review of proposed amend
ments to local comprehensive plans, and that they direct the city
manager to pursue revision of these proposed guidelines so that they
would apply only to those land use plan amendments which are truly
of regional significance. The Community Development Department staff
will continue to work with the Metropolitan Council staff during the
month of August in an attempt to modify the procedure in a manner
consistent with the city council's direction.
The
concerns identified herein. They specifically agreed that the pro-
posed regulations appeared to address items of local concern as well
as those of regional concern,. and concurred with the staff's recom-
mendation that any involvement of the Metropolitan Council in the plan
amendment process should relate only to amendments of regional
significance.
Respectfully. submitted,
~~:~`~-
Karl Nollenberger
City D°anager
KN/jf
cc: Community Development Director
Associate Planner
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL GUIDELINES
FOR REVIEW OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS
I. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires counties, cities, and
townships that wish to amend their comprehensive plans to follow the
same review and approval procedure they used when adopting their
plans. This means that local governmental units must submit proposed
amendments to .adjacent communities and affected school districts for
comment and to the Metropolitan Council for review. Minn. Stat.
473.8b4, subd. 2 (1978) .
The purpose of these guidelines is to establish a procedure for review
of proposed amendments to local comprehensive plans. The land
planning act authorizes the Metropolitan Council to prepare and adopt
such guidelines. Minn. Stat. 473.854 (1978).
Not all changes in local comprehensive plans are considered to be
amendments under these guidelines. Section III of the guidelines
lists 12 types of changes that are amendment. These changes fall
into three basic categories: changes in local sewer service. systems,
changes that may have impacts on regional facilities and systems, .and
changes that may affect planned population density in rural service
areas identified in local plans..
The guidelines provide for a review period of 90 to 120 days following
Metropolitan Council receipt of a proposed amendment.
II. SCOPE
These guidelines apply to all amendments proposed by a local
governmental unit after it has prepared and adopted a comprehensive
plan in accordance with the land planning act. Proposed changes in
local comprehensive plans not included in the definition of
"amendment" in Section III are not subject to these guidelines and
need not be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review.
III. DEFINITIONS
The terms "Applicable Planning Statute," "Capital Improvement
Program," "Comprehensive Plan," "Local Governmental Unit," or "Unit,"
and "Private Sewer Facility," shall have the meaning given them in the
definition section of the land planning act, Minn. Stat. 473.852
(1978). As used in these guidelines, additional terms shall be
defined as follows:
1.• Amendment - one or more of the following proposed changes to a
comprehensive plan.
a. Any change in the area to be served by public or
private sewer service from that identified for such
service in the local sewer policy plan.
-2-
b. Any change in the timing of provision of public or
private sewer service from that identified in the local
sewer policy plan.
c. Any change in the local sewer policy plan resulting in
effluent flow exceeding the 1990 or five-year staging
forecasts previously projected in the local sewer
policy plan or any change in the sewer policy plan or
implementation program, standards and conditions for
the installation and operation of private sewer
facilities.
d. Any change in the land use plan for an area within 1000-
feet of a regional recreational facility.
e. Any change to the local transportation plan regarding a
facility that abuts or intercepts a regional
recreational facility.
f.A_ny change in the land use plan enabling the change of
10 or more acres from residential to commercial or
industrial use.
g. Any change to the land use plan changing land use or
density of development in the rural service area or
changing the area identified as the rural service area.
h. Any change in the land use plan enabling, within one-
half mile of a metropolitan interchange or of a
principal or intermediate arterial, a nonresidential'
use over 10 acres in size or a residential development
of 200 or more dwelling units.
i. Any change in the land use plan enabling the
construction of a facility that would constitute an
obstruction to air navigation, within the meaning of
Volume 14 of Minnesota Code ~ Agency Rules (MCAR)
Section 1.3009.
j. Any change in the land use plan enabling, within an
airport influence area, a change to residential use
from any other land use.
k. Any change in the land use plan for a~n area of_ more
than 20 acres.
1. Any change in the land use plan for an area within 1.00.
feet of the local governmental boundaries.
2. Airport influence area means a circle whose center is the
airport reference center and whose radius is one mile in the case of
a minor airport, two miles in the case of an intermediate airport,
and-four miles in the case of a mayor airport, as those airports are
identified in the Metropolitan Council's Airports System Plan/
Development Guide.
-3-
3. Airport reference point means the geographic center of an
airport, as identified in the airport layout plan for each airport.
4. Change includes, but is not limited to, changes in the type,
location, intensity, and extent of land and water use.
5. Implementation program means the implementation program
required by the land planning act, at Minn. Stat. 473.859, Subd. 4,
(1978) .
b. Land Planning Act means Minn. Stat. 473.851-473.852 and
Minn. Stat. 473.175 (1978).
7. Metropolitan interchange means the physical means by which a
metropolitan transportation facility is accessed and connected to
other metropolitan facilities and/or elements of the local
transportation system.
8. Principal or intermediate arterial means a principal or
intermediate arterial as these terms are defined in Table 12 and 13 of
the Metropolitan Council's Transportation Development Guide/Policy
Plan.
9. Regional recreation facility means a regional park, regional
park reserve, linear park, or other regional recreation facility as
identified in the Metropolitan Council's Recreation Open Space
Development Guide/Policy Plan.
10. Rural Service Area means
comprehensive plan prepared under
planned to receive urban services,
services, before 1990.
that area identified in a local
the land planning act that is not
including central sewer and water
IV. REVIEW PROCEDURES
1. After consideration of the amendment but before final
approval, the governing body simultaneously shall transmit a copy of
the proposed amendment to the Metropolitan Council and to adjacent
governmental units and affected school districts. The transmittal
letter to the Council shall contain an affidavit of mailing
identifying the adjacent governmental units and affected school
districts notified of the proposed amendment.
2. Adjacent governmental units and .affected school districts
shall have 30 days from receipt of the proposed amendment in which to
notify the Metropolitan Council and the proposing unit of government
of their intent to review and comment upon the proposed amendment.
Failure to submit a notice of intent to review and comment within the
time limit herein specified constitutes a waiver of the right to so
review and comment.
-4-
3. If no notices of intent are received by the Metropolitan
Council within 30 days of receipt of the proposed amendment, the
Council shall have 60 days to review by Council action the proposed
amendment pursuant to the land planning act, at Minn. Stat. 473.175
(1978).
4. Adjacent governmental units and affected school districts
that have submitted on a timely basis a notice of intent to review and
comment shall have 60 days from receipt of the proposed amendment in
which to submit their review and comments to the Council and to the
proposing governmental unit.
5. If any notice of intent•to review and comment is received by
•the Council from an adjacent governmental unit or affected school
district, the Council shall have. 60 days from the expiration of the
review and comment period specified in (4) above to review by Council
action the proposed amendment pursuant to the land planning act, at
Minn. Stat. 473.175 (1978).
n
E
FORM A
FROM: City of
TO: City of
SIIBJECT: Local Comprehensive Plan Amendment Transmittal
The City of proposes to adopt the attached
amendment to its comprehensive plan. .The city is requested to
evaluate the attached amendment and respond via the below notice of
intent to comment within 30 days; failure to submit a timely notice of
intent to comment shall constitute a waiver of any right to comment on
this proposed amendment.
Submitting 0 icia
NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENT
FROM: City of
TO: City of and Metropolitan Council
SUBJECT: Plan Amendment Comments
The City of has reviewed the proposed
comprehensive plan amendment of the City of and
intends to offer co~rsnents therein. Such comments shall be submitted
in accordance with Metropolitan Council guidelines.
CITY OF
Clerk or Other Official
CY230A
/9 /f
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 263
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Setting Date of Hearing for Wine
License Application, Shakey's Pizza
Parlor, 500 East 78th Street
At the May 12, 1980 city council meeting, the city council
approved a request from Shakey's Pizza Parlor, 500 East 78th.
Street for a special use permit for purposes of serving wine.
The final matter for council consideration regarding this
issue is the wine license application. The application has been
submitted, and our public safety department has made the necessary
background investigation.
The ordinance relating
wing of wine provides for a
the license application. I
a wine 1
Street.
to license applications for the ser-
public hearing to be held regarding
would be appropriate for the city
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City P•lanager
KN/eja
cc: Deputy City Clerk
Public Safety Director
/~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 262
Agenda July 28, 1980
The.Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Appointment of Youth Member to Human
Rights Commission
The ordinance establishing the Human Rights Commission requires
that two members of the ten member commission be youth members,
appointed for one year terms. One of the youth members on the
commission, Ms. Dawn Nilsen, graduated from high school this spring
and will be attending college out of the state in the fall, thus
creating a vacancy for a youth position on this commission.
We are at
1Re>spectf1nully submitted,
J
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
This item has been scheduled. for council consideration at the
July 28, 1980 city council meeting.
'1
Date ~ ~~
APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD
M ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
NAME --1' /~J~~ ~ l I ~C I~/_5 ~ C~i Z~~C T/~
Last :r'irst - 1Vli~uie
HOME ADDRESS ~n ~~(; ~~~-~~_L~t1~~ -..t'C.Q1-~t~P.~~~ ,SS~,,~3
Street No. City Zip Ccde
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address)
Street No. •. City .Zip Code
PHONE: Home ~~„ln' ~~1 ~~ Business
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission Human Rights Commission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comm._~~ Civil Service Commissior:
Senior Citizen & Handicapped- Advisory Board of Health
Advisory Commission Other
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this
municipal commission/committee and why ;you are interested in serving:
s.9 Dll`D , CCO ~~~G~~ D'~-Z-~ ~,y~c~~D ,D~r,~' .~GD~~tiz ' ~~ C~~2~D
~~
~~+C,~~%o(/C ~ ~~ GD s1/-CAL-~ ~~~i°~~-CL.~' _ ~~12~~~G2 ~~I -~2~DlQ'''~sL y"`~~','f `l
~~ ~ ~
CIVIC, PRO SSIO AL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES:
~!
OCCUPATION:
Employing firm, agency, ~~
Address ~i,(, ~``~ `-~UZ,{~.,~/ljyr~~j ~~`(~
~1 I 7
Position cp~~CGGC`,t-y a~Zcf``Iears w!firm,~agen~,-
Other work experience (optional)
<, ~ ,
l..-~r-~ ;G~y'fi~~i,y/ ~~i,~~• ~-C'~~t/~ ~,0 (~~~G~iC~i
REFERENCES (Optional)
A . ~l% ~?2~/,C ~~/lG~~~r~-' ~ l ~ ~`JIIDC ~~~lt~%C~ , Z ~
Full name Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
B,
Full n e Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
C . ~Gl
Full name
Relationship
Mailing address Phone number
Return to: City Manager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield 55423
Date ~~_ h~. -80
APPLICATION FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD
ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
NAME fTn ck'rti~~ ~ ~^l~r-"'- i~, '~~`~4'?`
Last :First ~ Nli~die
HOME ADDRESS E, ~~~`~ 1-~_,~; , ,_,~ 1'-I~~'-=- ~.. ~,~:ji}-~~'a'y '~ `I _~. 5
Street No~~ City Zip Ccde
MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address)
PHONE: Home ~(,~ ~-~!~J:.?.U, Business
Street No.
City
Zip Code
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Planning Commission
Park and Recreation Advisory Comm.
Senior Citizen & Handicapped
Advisory Commission
Human Rights Commission~C=~t~.,,~-t-{~
Civil Service Commissior: ~~~~ +"'~~
Advisory Board of Health
Other
Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this
municipal commission/commit*_ee and why ;you are interested in serving:
4 rrvr~.:.zz~,c.f_1
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL
s:
-.-r~.~v .j 1 .l
~;
:,
r
(/`y
f
OC CU PATION:~ !w: ~tUl-~- - '.-', l y ~ '''~~ <_~'-
Employing ,firm, agency - t~'_., ~ =t ,;:~:r- ~r,~7~: ~^
Address
Position; ;~~ {; ~ ? - ,? years w,'firm,~age:,•~ ~ ~ -~ ~. -
Other work experience (optional)
REFERENCES (Optional)
A . ~ ., c? SL, C~t+?%~t; ~t,r ~ m !~ ~C:~ VC=' T
Fu11 name. Relationship
3 ~~~ ( ~,~~ ~ ~c.:c~c' ~1 ~ 11~ ~~~ ~ z r~ p~. 3 i - s X30 ~- i.~~ 7
Mailing address L~Icnr~;hcJ.~j~;;~ S~,y~(3~7 Phone number
i
Full name
Relatio
hip
~~flt3 ~ e~lle+ r'v~ ~~ ~ /~?;nnc%.~,f 5 ~t~,ti' .~s ~/~13 ~'C~~ - ~S 7C~Z
Mailing address ~ Phone number
Full name Relationship
Mailing address ~- Phone number
Return to: City Manager's Office
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield 55423
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 261
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf field
Council Members: '
Subject: Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation
i
A presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to these two
former commission members has been scheduled for the July 28, 1980
city council meeting. Both members will be present to accept these
certificates from the city council.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ ~~i~~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
7
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 260
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council ~Q,~ ,~~,~cQ- bw' ~"'~`~~~^"'° "'~
City of Richfield
Council Members: '
Subject: Amendment to the Zoning Code Relating to Fences
cient snow storage space between fences and public
requirement has generated some complaints and is n
areas of the city where there are nn v„hl ; r~ ~; ~aA~.,a
rice puns to construct sidewalks in the future. Attached for the
council's consideration is a draft ordinance amendment which would
allow some flexibility in dealing with the question of fence set-
backs.
The att
ordinance allows the city manager to waive the
e
must find that the reduced setback would not conflict with the city's
sidewalk policy or create any potential snow storage problems. This
would allow for fences to be constructed which will not create snow
storage problems, while minimizing the approval process which property
It is recommended that the city council give first reading
approval to the attached ordinance amendment. The Planning Commis-
sion has reviewed this proposed ordinancQ amendment and recommended
city council approval.
KN/jf
Respectfully submitted,
1~~ ~~~~~
Karl Nollenberger
City D~anager
sidewalks. This
cc: Community Development Director
Community Services Director
City Attorney
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III,
SECTION 3.39 OF THE
~ ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter III, Section 3.39 of the Ordinance Code of the City
of Richfield dealing with exemptions and modifications to the
zoning code is hereby amended by amending subdivision 2, paragraph
e., thereof to read as follows:
(e) A wall, fence or hedge may occupy part of the required
yard; except that (1) no wall, fence or hedge more than four
feet in height shall be constructed or. permitted between the
front line of the lot and the front line of the building
extended to the side lot lines. (2) no wall, fence or hedge
more than six feet in height shall be constructed or permitted
on any rear yard or sideyard, and (3) no wall, fence or hedge
more than four feet in the side abutting upon a street or
corner lot which abut upon a key lot. All posts on any fence
located on or near the lot line shall be on the inside of the
fence unless they are designed as a integral part of the fence.
The term "hedges" as used in this paragraph shall not include
trees. All walls, fences and hedges abutting on the public
right-of-way shall be set back three feet from the public right
of way [ . ]
except that walls, fences and hedges abutting on public right-
of-way which is contiguous to non-collector or non-arterial
roadways as designated by the adopted comprehensive plan may
be exempted from this set back provision when in the opinion
of the city manager such exemption will not conflict with any
existing city sidewalk policy nor create any potential snow
storage problem. Barbed wire and electric fences are prohibited.
Fences shall k~e set back three feet from parking areas. On any
corner lot nothing shall be erected, placed, planted or allowed
to grow in such a manner as to obstruct vision between the
height of two and one-half feet above and ten feet above the
intersection of the center lines of the intersecting streets in
the area bounded by the street curb limes abutting said corner
lot and a line connecting points on the abutting curb lines fifty
feet from the intersection of the extensions of the curb lines.
All fences, walls and hedges legally existing on the effective
date of this amendment shall be allowed to continue to exist and
to be repaired and maintained.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this day of 1980.
ATTEST:
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
~~
%`
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office if City Manager
Council Letter No. 259
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
ed the staff to prepare
system. These bids were opened on June 20, 1980.
tabulations is attached for city council review.
A copy of the b
The design of state of the art telecommunication systems is so
ex that it is not feasible to prepare exact specifications for
•rne start aia, however, draw up specifications with
intention that they be used as a minimum standard in
of a system. The dependability of the system and
primary concern because in an emergency the telephone
resu
atety. This link can not be jeopardized.
the bid opening are:
Vendor Base Bid
The initial
i. Northwestern Bell $ 63,278.33 (+$1,154.67/mo.)
2. H & B Telephones 67,695.00
3. EDC Telecommunications 93,365.00
4. Telamerica 99,507.00
5. Executone 121,581.69
6. Norstan Communications 13'3,791.00
Subject: Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contract,
Telecommunications System
Council Letter No. 259 -2- July 28, 1980
~ ~ _ -
H & B Telephones, the apparent low bidder, bid a system that
does not meet specifications, in that it does not provide the call
forwarding features that were specified. The specified feature for-
. wards a call to another phone after three rings. Without this feature,
the new telephone system would be little better than the existing
system. In .order to have these features,.the memory of the system pro-
posed by H & B must be replaced at additional cost, with a larger mem-
ory system that will not be on the market until 'the fourth quarter
of 1980.
an extended period of time, the specifications require the manufac-
turer, not just the installer, to enter into a binding agreement to
guarantee service, maintenance, and parts. Siemens Corporation, the
manufacturer of H & B's switch, will not enter into a binding agree-
ment. The city office phone system could be jeopardized by the same
problem which occurred with the Richfield High School phone system.
The high school had a Siemens system installed. The installer of the
system went out of business leaving the school to find someone to
maintain its system. H & B is a diversified company. They provide
a wide assortment of building products and services. The telephone
division provides less than 10% of their business. In our opinion,
this indicates a lack of commitment to the telephone industry. H & B's
bid was rejected for not meeting the afforementioned specifications.
At $93,365.00, EDC's bid is incomplete in terms of meeting the
specifications. Alternates were proposed that do meet the specifi-
cations, specifically:
1. Attendant Console Busy Lamp Field - $995.00
2. Standby Power/Battery Reserve - $8,892.00
3. Radio Pack - $3,229.00
To consider this bid competitive with the other bids, these
alternates must be included. Inclusion of these items to make this
proposal complete result in a bid price of $106,481.00. Also, con-
tacts with EDC customers having similar system installations revealed
a•commonly occurring problem: after a power failure to the switch,
the telephone system did not come back."on line". A service techni-
cian had to be dispatched to the site to "manually" reprogram the
switch, and the telephone system remained inoperative until the unit
was reprogrammed. During a power failure situation, the public safety
department typically receives more telephone calls than ncrmal (for
example, during the July 15, 1980 storm and resulting power outage,
the police and fire divisions experienced a 2,000 percent increase in
telephone calls). Based on the increased demand, for fire and police
service at this time, this power failure characteristic would be
unacceptable.
Council Letter No. 259 -3-
July 28, 1980
transmission rate. Their system cannot handle the transmission rate
that the liquor stores require for data communication links to the
data processing center.
This leaves two bids to consider: Norstan and Teleamerica.
Norstan met all specifications. The equipment is of good quality, and
the service seems thorough and dependable, but at $133,791.00, the
cost seems unjustifiable if the city can get comparable telephone ser-
vice at a lower price.
r ,.
their proposal•was unsigned at the time of.the bid opening-. When
notified of this, the Telamerica representative stated that it was an
oversight, and returned to the city offices to sign it. This is con-
sidered an informality, and since the bid is now signed, it should
not be rejected on these grounds. Telamerica is a business committed
exclusively to telephones with an excellent track record. GTE, the
manufacturer of their switch, will guarantee parts, service, and
maintenance as specified.
cil a
completed
in 1981 will be 521,983.65 less than in `i980, assuming no rate in-
creases from the present telephone service company, which just re-
cently received approval of a rate increase. Since the recommended
telephone system will include purchase of equipment, rather than lease,
the cumulative effects of such savings will likely be even greater in
future years, since the capital costs of the telephone system will be'
fixed, rather than subject to on-going increases.
The staff recommends that council accept Telamerica's bid at
$99,507.00 as the lowest qualified bidder.
Respectfully submitted,
l~c.~ ~~
I~~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/jf
cc: Program Directors
Telamerica has estimated that the new telephone equipment can
stalled and operational by the end of the year, if the city coun-
wards the contract on July 28. If that installation is in fact,
CITY OF RICHFIELD
~ Bid Opening
June 20, 1980
Telephone Communications System
City Project No. 720
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative
Staff was called by Assistant City Manager Joyce L. Wilde, who announced that the
purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for the
Telephone Communications System as advertised in the official newspaper on
June 4, and 11, 1980.
Present: Joyce L. Wilde, Assistant City Manager
Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
BIDDER
BID SECURITY ~O~
Northwestern Bell
B.B. 5% $63,.278.33 + $1 ,154,67 monthly
EDC Telecommunications
B.B. 5% $93 365.00
Executone
B. B. 5% $121, 581 69
H & B Telephone
B. B. 5% $67, 695 00
Norstan Communications
B. B. 5% $133, 791 00
Telamerica
B. B. 5% ___ $99. 507.00
The Assistant City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and
considered at the regular city council meeting of July 14, 1980.
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
a
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AWARDING BID FOR TELEPHONE
SYSTEM TO TELAMERICA, INC.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that the desian of state-of-the-art
telecommunication systems is so complex that it is not feasible
to prepare exact'specifications for such systems.
2. It is hereby determined that the bid of Telamerica is the
lowest responsible bid to sell a telephone system meeting
specifications and requirements of the city.
This determination is made on the basis of the analysis
and evaluation of versatility and adaptability of the systems
design, reliability of service and maintenance, costs, and other
design features.
3. The bid of Telamerica is hereby accepted. The Mayor,
City Manager and other appropriate officers of the city are
directed to take such steps and enter into agreements to give
effect of this resolution.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 28th day of July, 1980.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, Acting City Clerk
M
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 258
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City.of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Purchase in Excess of $1,000
Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that
the puchase of construction materials, supplies, and other items in
excess of $1,000 must be approved by the city council. Ori the
July 28, 1980 city council agenda there are several such items.
Fencing and Gates
A fence enclosure project is included in the 1980 budget for
the water plant. The project calls for isolation of the parking lot
east of the water plant from the sludge pits, with fencing, and in-
cludes a gate for access to the pits. Four firms submitted quotations
for the fencing, gates and incidentals such as rails and posts. The
quotations were as follows: Sterling Fence, Inc., $3,029.00; Crown
Fence, $3,089.00; Lynx Fencing, Inc., $3,397.55 and Anchor Fence,
$2,408.86. It is recommended that the city council authorize the
purchase of fencing and gates from Anchor Fence, in the amount of
$2,408.86.
With increasing interest in the Ric r. Acres golf course as the
opening date neared, the golf course citizen committee felt that
community involvement in the project would be of benefit to all
parties concerned. To that end, the comnl`ittee developed a donation
"package" for all twenty-seven tee boxes, which would include bench,
waste basket, hole sign, and a ball washer installed on concrete. The
donor would provide $350 for purchase of the package, in exchange for
a small sign of recognition to the donor which would be located at
the tee box. The staff provided research on the various items to
be included in the package. Quotations or catalog prices were ob-
tained for pine and redwood, and it was .the recommendation of the
committee that redwood be used throughout the course.
Benches: Standard offered a redwood bench just over five feet
at a price of $275, personalized, and $175, unpersonalized.
Standard also offered a 52 foot plain wood bench at a cost of
$130. Par-Aide offered a six foot redwood bench at a cost of
$155.75. The frames alone for this bench can be purchased at
a price of $115.75. Par-Aide also offered a four foot settee
for $135.50. Mexico Forge (Earl F. Anderson & Assoc.) offered
Council Letter No. 258 -2- July 28, 1980
a permanent type park bench, six feet in length, at a cost of
$71 in pine, and $107 in redwood. Mexico Forge also had a
portable six foot bench that sells for $83 in pine, and $112
in redwood. It was the recommendation of the committee and
staff that the permanent redwood bench from Mexico Forge be
offered in the package. At a unit price, including quantity
discount, it is recommended that the city council authorize
the purchase, through donations, of 27 permanent redwood benches
at a unit price of $104.30 for a total purchase price from
Earl F. Anderson and Associates in the amount of $2,816.10.
Waste Baskets: Mexico Forge sells waste baskets to match. the
benches. The permanent installation sells for $59 in pine, and
$103 in Redwood. The portable waste baskets sell for $73 in
pine, and $117 in redwood. All prices included containers.
The other type of waste basket available is a metal one, avail-
able from Standard. That model is available in a.variety of
colors. The Standard waste baskets are of a portable nature
but could be installed permanently. The cost per basket is
$23 for the 14" and $67.35 for the 21". In an effort to main-
tain uniformity, it was the recommendation of committee and
staff that the permanent installation redwood waste basket from
Mexico Forge be purchased. Therefore, it is recommended that
the city council authorize the purchase, through donations, of
27 permanent redwood waste baskets at a unit price of $93.85,
including quantity discount, for a total purchase price of
$2,533.95 from Earl F. Andersona and Associates.
Ball Washers: Some ball washers have already been purchased.
It was the recommendation of the committee and staff that ad-
ditional ball washers be purchased to match those already pur-
chased. It is recommended the city council authorize the pur-
chase of 17 ball washers, through donations, from Minnesota
Toro, Inc., at a unit price of $64.50, for a total purchase
price of $1,096.50.
The Community Center has two York air units each with fans and
compressors. The compressor of one unit is 19 years old, has an amp
draw higher than should be according to the plate data, and often
blows circuit breakers. The sealed, 7z horse unit cannot be repaired
and must be replaced. Quotations were obtained from Advanced Engi-
neering and Manufacturing Company, Yale Heating and Equipment Company
and Dlidland Heating Company. Other vendors were invited to submit
quotations but chose not to do so on the basis that the city has a
routine maintenance service contract and that contractor, Advanced
Engineering and Manufacturing, would be more familiar with the equip-
ment and the problem. Quotations submitted included all labor and
r
Council Letter No. 258 -3-
July 28, 1980
materials. The quotations were as follows: Advanced Engineering
and Manufacturing, $1,681; Yale Heating and Equipment Company,
$3,200; Midland Heating, $2,500. It is recommended the city coun-
cil authorize the replacement of the compressor on the York air
unit at the Community Center as quoted by Advanced Engineering and
Manufacturing Company in the amount of $1,681.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ 1~~ ~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/jf
cc: Community Services Director
/9c
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 257
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Planning Commission Recommendation Regarding
CP 705
In accordance with Minnesota State Statutes 462.356, the
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed public improvement
project for 66th Street between Lyndale Avenue and I-3564 (CP 7053)
and found that the planned acquisitions and capital improvements
are consistent with the city's adopted comprehensive plan. Attached
for your information is a copy of the resolution regarding this
matter which the Planning Commission passed at their July 8, 1980
meeting.
w
Respectfully submitted,
.~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/jf
the
cc: Community Development Director
r
RESOLUTION NO. 24
RESOLUTION FINDING THE ACQUISITION
OF PROPERTY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF
WEST 66TH STREET FROM LYNDALE AVENUE TO
I-35W TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
proposed acquisition of property for planned public improvements
on West 66th Street between Lyndale AVenue and I,-35W, and
WHEREAS; the proposed acquisitions would be necessary
to implement .the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Redevelopment Plan, and
WHEREAS, the proposed project and acquisitions are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has in the 1980-1985
Capital Improvement Program, found the concept of the planned
public improvement project to be in compliance with the city's
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Com-
mission finds the proposed acquisitions to be in compliance with
the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Passed by the Planning Commission of the City of
Richfield this 8th day of July 1980.
Joseph Ertman, Chairman
Ri~field Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Erich Russell, Secretary
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
Council Letter No. 256
Agenda July 28, 1980
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield r.
Council Members: ~ ~"
Subject: Validity of Petition Submitted by Superamerica
- to Rezone the Property Located at 7645 Nicollet
Avenue from C-1 to C-2
s
Restaurants. The staff has investig
found the following:
s matter in detail and
1. The property located at 7717 Nicollet Avenue So uth is
jointly owned by Relo Leasing Corporation and C
Enterprise. lark
2. Left Guard, Inc., leases the property from Relo Leasing
Corporation and Clark Enterprise, and operates two (2)
restaurants on the property.
3. Left Guard, Inc. is owned and managed
Mr. McDermott. by Mr. Ma x rlcGee and
4. Mr. Larkin, whose signature is on the petition for this
property, is employed by Left Guard, I nc., and is the man-
ager of Maximillian's.
5.
6.
7. The address listed after Mr. Larkin's signature on the
petition is for Programmed Land, Inc., and not for Mr.
Larkin, Left Guard, Inc., Clark Enterprises, or Relo
Leasing, Inc.
8. The legal description after Mr. Larkin's signature is mean-
ingless and does not describe the property in question.
Relo Leasing Corporation and Clark Enterprise had no
knowledge of the petition being signed by Mr. Larkin.
Council Letter No. 256 -2- July 28, 1980
matter.] 1
on in this
Therefore, it is recommended that the city .council reject the
applicant's petition for rezoning, and terminate the rezoning pro-
cess pending submission of a new, valid rezoning petition from
Superamerica. Superamerica has been advised that the signature on
the original petition is not considered to be valid, and serves to
invalidate the rezoning requested by that petition.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/jf
cc: City Attornye
Community Development Director
Based on the above information, it is the opinion of the staff
LAW OFFICES
LEFEVERE, LEFLER. PEARSON, O' BRIEN &DRAWZ
1100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
CLAYTON L. LaFEVERE BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICES
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS4O2 610 BROOKDALE TOWERS
H ERBERT P. LEFLER
CURTIS A. PEARSON TELEPHONE 16121 333-0543 2810 COUNTY ROAD 10
J. DENNIS O'BRIEN BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
JOHN E. DRAWZ 1980
July l6 16121 561-3200
DAVID J• KENNEDY ,
JOHN B-DEAN
GLENN E. PURDUE RICHARD J. SCHIEFFER
JAMES D. CARSON
CHARLES L. LEFEVERE
HERBERT P. LEFLER, III
JEFFREY' J. STRAND
JAMES P. O'M EARA
MARY J. BJORKLUND
THOMAS D. CR EIG HTON
WENDY L. FREEDMAN
Mr . Rick Jopke ~„y~'~.~ °°`~~
Associate Planner ~!:~fY~''~
City of~ Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423 _,
Dear Mr. Jopke:
Based upon the information which you have supplied in your
letter of June 11, 1980, and taking into account the fact
that an objection to the sufficiency of the zoning petition
has been raised before adoption of the rezoning ordinance,
it is my recommendation that the city dismiss the rezoning
proceedings at this time.
If the city council were to proceed, it is possible that no
legal challenges would be made; that the requested improve-
ments to the subject property could be installed and that
the sufficiency of the rezoning petition would never be ad-
judicated. In the circumstances of this case, however, we
have been contacted by the attorney for one of the objecting
neighbors. A lawsuit was not overtly threatened but it
appears to be a real possibility. Litigation on this ques-
tion would involve substantial time anti expense on the part
of the city and the outcome of the litigation would be
uncertain. Any such uncertainty can be avoided by the
recommended action, I believe.
Very truly yours,
_ <.,
~1--__
Clayton. LeFevere ~--~
CLL: jpf
cc: D4r. Karl Nollenberger
w/enclosures
r
July 11, 1980
Clayton LeFevere
1100 First National Hank Building
r~nneapolis, P~~ 55402
Dear Clayton:
As we discussed on t;
whether the rezoning
valid. The question
property occupied by
the property owner.
found the following:
ze phone, there is a question about
petition submitted by Superamerica is
is whether the signature for the
Chichi`s and t~iaximillian's is in fact
Our investigation of this matter has
1. The property located at 7717 Nicollet P.venue South
is jointly owned by Relo Leasing Corporation and
Clark Enterprise.
2. Left Guard, Inc. leases the property from Relo
Leasing Corporation and Claris Enterprise, and
operates two (2) restaurants on the property.
3. Left Guard, Inc. is owned and rlanaged by PRr. riax
r4cGee and Mr. ~ScDermott.
4. t~ir. Larkin, whose signature is on the petition for
thins property, is eriployed by Left Guard, Inc.
5. b1r. Lar}:in's signature is not valid. He is not the
property owner and at the tine the petition Baas
signed had no authority to sign the petition.
6. We discussed the ~:atter with Mr. Earl Lenger of Relo'
Leasing and he had no knowledge of r-Ir. Larkin signing
the petition. He has subsequently sent us a letter
indicating that Pdr. .~'icGee and/or ;~1r. :icDermott or
their designee have authority to approve proposals
before local governing bodies concerning the zoning
of their properties (letter attached). The letter
does not, however, say that they have authority to
approve zoning proposals for adjacent properties.
Mr. Clayton LeFevere
-- 2 -
July 11, 1984
7. The address listed after Mr. Larkin's signature on the
petition is for Progra;~med Land, Inc. and not for i1r.
Larkin, Left Guard, Inc, Clark Enterprises, or Zelo
Leasing, Inc.
8. The legal description after bir. Larkin's signature is
meaning]~ess and does not describe the property in question.
Based on the above information, I would conclude that t:~e petition.
is not valid-and, therefore, the rezoning process should be
terminated. Please advise me on this matter so that the council
can take the appropriate action at their July 28 meeting.
Sincerely,
Rick Jopke
Associate Planner
RJ:ej
Enc.
1
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter NO. 255
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject:• Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contract -
Nature Center Carpeting
On Monday, June 30, 1980, the city manager opened bids for car-
peting at the Wood Lake Nature Center. The Deputy City Clerk, Com-
munity Services Director, a coordinator of the Community Services
Department and the Community Services Administrative Aide were also
present. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for city
council review.
Invitation to vendors was provided through legal notice and
telephone contact. Four vendors responded and obtained spec ifica-
tions, but only one vendor submitted a formal bid. Following the
bid opening, additional contact was made with potential vendors and
a request for informal written quotations was made. Two alternate
carpets were specified in the formal bidding procedure. The informal
quotation from Carpet World, Inc., was for the carpet specified in
alternate 2, at a total package price of $7,367.95, not including
disposal of existing carpet as specified in the formal package.
Creative Business Interiors submitted an informal quotation for al-
ternate 2 in the amount of $7,800.45. Midwest Floor Covering, Inc.,
submitted an informal quotation for a carpet not specified but claimed
by the vendor to be an equal of alternate 1, for a total package price
of $6,826.00. Packaged Furniture and Carpet Company submitted two
informal quotations for carpet claimed as equal with the package for
alternate 1, totalling $6,620.81, and for alternate 2, totalling
$6,297.43.
In an attempt to provide an accurate assessment and comparison
of the formal bid and the informal quotations, staff conducted addi- .
tional research. Contact with the city's trash disposal contractor
indicates the disposal costs for the current carpeting would be a
minimum of $200 and most likely more. The specified carpet alternates
were for woven carpet, which is a process of placing threads on the
backing material. The "equal" carpet quotations were for tufted
carpet which is another type of process for placing threads on the
backing material. The tufted carpet will snag and run, making it
difficult to provide a safe and easily maintained material in the
high use areas of the nature center. The loops or weave of the fabric
Council Letter No. 255 -2- July 28, 1980
were also examined in terms of maintenance. It would not be desirable
to have a carpet that will easily catch and hold plant material, pins,
staples or other objects. Having looked at the various carpets, it
was determined that only the specified carpets were acceptable on the
basis of safety and ease of maintenance. Of the two carpets speci-
fied, alternate 2 was preferrable on the basis of durability under
anticipated use, miantenance ease and aesthetics.
The informal quotation from Carpet World, Iric., would call for
an additional expense of an estimated $200 or more related to disposal
of the existing carpet. Because of this factor, the formal bid re- .
ceived from Commers Interiors, Inc., would more likely, in fact, be
the lower price. In addition, the formal bid specifications call for
a strict timetable for completion of work to the owner's satisfaction,
a performance bond, and a one-year unconditional guarantee against
workmanship covering further restretching, repair of seams, puckering
and any other defects that might be directly pointed to defect in
workmanship. These p~.rticular items are not directly included in the
informal quotations.
It is the recommendation of staff that the city council accept
the one bid received at the June 30, 1980, bid opening for alternate 2,
in the amount of $7,590.69. The bid includes the removal and disposal
of an estimated 437 square yards of existing carpet at a unit price of
$1.75 and furnishing and installing new carpet, an estimated 437 square
yards, at a unit price of $15.62. The total bid package is based on
estimated measurements, although final payment will be made on the
basis of actual measurements. Due to the delay in award of contract,
it is further recommended that the completion date be altered from
September 1, 1980, to October 1, 1980. Funding for this work is pro-
vided by the special revenue fund.
In summary, it is recommended that the city council take the
following actions:
1. Accept the bid minutes and tabu3:ations for carpeting at the
Wood Lake Nature Center.
2.
Wood Lake Nature
alternate 2, in
3. Approve the adjustment in completion date by changing from '
Spetember 1, 1980, to October 1, 1980.
Respectfully submitted,
KN/jf
` , 1
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Community Services Director
CARPETING FOR WOOD LAKE
NATURE CENTER
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative
Staff was called by Karl Nollenberger, City Manager, who announced that the purpose
of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, sealed bids for Carpeting for
Wood Lake Nature Center as advertised in the official newspaper on :June 18, 1980.
Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager
Don Fondrick, Community Services Director
Sandra Rosenow, Administrative Aide
Randy Hughes, Naturalist
Sylvia Bergh, Acting City Clerk
The following bid was submitted and read aloud:
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Bid Opening
June 30, 1980
BIDDER AND
BID SECURITY
ALTERNATE ~~1
ALTERNATE ~k2
Commers Interiors,Bloomington
B. B. 5% $6,874.01
$7,590.69
The City Manager announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at
the regular city council meeting of July 14, 1980;
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
~~'~"
i
L/
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 254
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Coun~~il Members:
~~ m ~ ~~~
Subject: Hearing on Appeal of City Order for Compliance
With Fire Code
On May 15, 1980, the Assistant Fire Chief, Mr. Patrick Coughlin,
The major fire code issues and alleged violations in this instance
relate to the requirement for installation of a fire protection
sprinkler system and certain modifications to the existing electri-
cal system within that building.
By way of background, the building involved was originally con-
structed, and is currently owned by, Mr. J. E. Braas, and was uti-
lized for light manufacturing and sales functions. For that partic-
ular use of the premises the building met all appropriate fire code
provisicns. However, Mr. Braas has ceased his operations on the
premises, and leased the property to the Glidden Paint Co., whicY-~ is
presently using the premises as a paint distribution center. This
change ir, use, particularly with the introduction of large quantities
of flammable liquids into the building, does not conform to our fire
code provisicns.
This change in form cf occupancy was discovered by the public
safety department during a routine annual fire inspection of the
property. The public safety department In,as attempted to negotiate
the necessary corrections with both the property owner, Mr. Braas,
and the tenant, Glidden Paint Company. Our efforts to. this end
have not been successful,.which is ~~~hy the formal order for correc-
was issued, on May 15, 1980. An appeal of this order before the city
council has been jointly requested by Mr. Braas and the Glidden Paint
Company. The council will consider this matter under their respon-
sibility as the Board of Hearing Appeals. The hearing has been sched-
uled as a regular part of the council meeting on July 28, 1980. At
that time, presentations will be made by the individuals requesting
the hearing, as well as public safety department personnel, for city
council consideration in making a determination with regard to this
matter.
Respectfully submitted,
KN/jf
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Pnhl ic- Safety l~irP~t~r
~~
Exhibit One
HEARING ON APPEAL OF
APPLICATION OF FIRE PREVENTION CODE
Regarding
84 6Vest 78th Street
J. E. Braas - Lessor
GLIDDEN COATINGS ~ RESINS - Lessee
Before The
Richfield City Council
July 28, 1J 80
. ~`.
3.09. FIRE PREVEN'T'ION CODE,
Subdivision 1. Adoption of_ Fire Prevention Code. The. following is hereby
adopted by reference ;is an ordinance of the city: The Minnesota Uniform Fire
Code including the 1973 edition of the Uuifarm Fire Cade and amendments to it
and including the 10 volume nal.ic~nal. c•~~dr, o[ Che Nati~~nal Fire Protection
Association (1973-74). Th~~ provi.sirnia: ~r1 snch cede are hereby adopted and
i.nccrrporated into this cede as i f fnl Iv ~:et forth hr~rein and shall be in full
~ orce ,end effect i_n this r i ty, exec}~t as hereinafter ~;pec i l i_ed.
Quill. }.979-17) 9/24/7
1 ~)! 24/ 7U
LORDINANCE CODE 29 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO fA
w
Subd. 2. Establishment_of Duties of the Fire Department.
(1) The Fire Prevention Code shall be enforced by the fire department of
the city under the supervisions and direction of the chief of the fire depart-
ment, and the manager. The officer or officers specifically in charge of the
administration of this code shall be known as the fire marshal or marshals
and shall be given authority for this purpose by the chief of the fire de-
partment.
(2) The fire marshal or marshals shall be designated by the manager in
accordance with the civil service laws applicable to the fire department of
the city. ,
(3) The chief of the fire department may detail such members of .the fire
department as inspectors, working under the fire marshal. or marshals as
shall from time to time be deemed necessary. The chief of the fire department
may recommend to the manager the employ ment of technical inspectors who, when
such authorization is made, shall be selected to assist the fire marshal or
marshal s
(4) In addition to the fire marshal. or fire marshals the Fire Prevention
Code may also be enforced by the health officer or chief inspector whenever
appropriate and after consulatation with the fire marshal or fire marshals
(5) A report by the fire marshal shall be made annually.and transmitted
to the manager; it shall contain all proceedings under this code, with such
statistics as the chief of the fire department may wish to include therein;
the chief of the fire department shall also recommend any amendments to the
code, which in his judgment, shall be desirable,
CROSS-RE]'ERENCE: See Chap, II, Part IV, for specific Fire Department
Personnel regulations,
4/8/68
ORDINANCE CODE 30 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO fA
t
i i ..
Subd. 3. Powers of the Fire Marshall or Other Enforcing Officers. Any such
fire marshall or other officer charged with enforcement of the provisions of
this part is authorized to enter any building or upon any premises in the
city at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection and is empowered to
enter any building which constitutes an imminent fire hazard at any time f_or
such purpose, subject to subdivision 4 herein. Such marshall or officer shall
have the power to order abatement of any unnecessary fire hazard in writing,
and any person in charge of the property on which the fire hazard exists, or
the owner thereof, when served with any such order shall abate such fire hazard
within such reasonable time as may be specified in such order.
Subd. 4. Inspection - Warrant. If any owner or occupier of any such building
or premises upon which ~an inspection is to be conducted objects to the same,
any authorized fire marshall or other officer shall first obtain a warrant per-
witting such entry or inspection. The provisions of this subdivision shall not
be held to apply when entry by authorized fire department personnel must be
made to prevent the spread of fire or to perform any such activities which are
necessary whenever a fire is imminent.
Subd. 5. Definitions. The
to them in this section:
(1) Whenever the word
it shall mean the city.
(2) Whenever the term
tion code, it shall be held
following terms shall have the meanings ascribed
"municipality" is used in the fire prevention code,
"corporation counsel" is used in the fire preven-
to mean the attorney.
Subd. 6. Prohibition of Storage of Flammable Liquids in Outside Aboveground
Tanks; Bulk Storage of Liquified Petroleum Gases; and Storage of Explosives
Blasting Agents. The city is developed primarily with residential, multiple-
residence, commercial and light industrial uses. The limits referred to in
sections 16.22A, 16.51, 21.6A and 12.6b of the fire prevention code include
all of the city, and the storage of the substances referred to in such sections,
in the manner referred to herein, is prohibited.
Subd. 7. Modifications. The chief of the fire department has the power to
modify any of the provisions of the fire prevention code upon application in
writing by the owner or lessee, or his duly authorized agent, when there are
practical difficulties in the means of carrying but the strict letter of the
code provided that the spirit of the code shall be observed, and public safety
shall always be secured. The particulars of such modification whey granted or
allowed and the decision of the chief of t}le fire department and a signed copy
shall be furnished the applicant.
Subd. 8. Appeals. Whenever the chief of the fire department shall disapprove
an application or refuse to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed
that the provisions of the code do not apply or that the true intent and
meaning of t}ie code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the appli-
cant may appeal from the decision of tfie chief of the fire department in ac-
cordance with the provisions of section 3.13 of this code.
31 4/8/68
ORDINANCE CODE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
.. ~ ~'
except that the failure to make service upon an occt.ipait of one unit shall not
affect the validity or effect of service of notice tipcl an occupant of other
units. Such notice shall also state that persons aggrieved may appeal such '
notice to the board of building and health appeals by filing a notice of
appeal with the clerk and may be Beard on such appeal Within one (1) week after
such filing, as more specifically provided in t}iis section,
Subd, 6. Failure to Correct Deficiencies. Whenever r>>tice has been given in
accordance with subdivision 4 of this section and the ;person or persons re-
sponsible have failed to correct the deficiencies specified therein within the
time allowed, the enforcing officer may either:
(1) in writing upon a showing of good cause, 'extend the time.for correction
of the deficiencies, or .
(2) serve upon the owner and occupant a written Zotice requiring that
such building, dwelling, dwelling unit, or rooming unit- be vacated because un-
fit for human habitation. Such notice shall:
(a) particularize the violation or violations Jhich remain uncorrected;
and
(b) provide a reasonable time, but not less then 30 days within which
to vacate the premises. Such written extension of time or"notice to vacate
may be served personally or by registered mail in accordance with the procedures
set forth in subdivision 3 of this section.
Subd. 7. A eals. Any person aggrieved by a notice issued pursuant to this
section may, within 15 days after service of the same, appeal therefrom to the
board of building, health and fire appeals by filing a written notice of appeal
with the clerk. In the case of an appeal from a notice to vacate pending elimi-
' nation of imminent hazards issued pursuant to subdivis~.on 4, the subdivision 7
hearing appeal shall be heard within one week from the time of filing thereof
unless the appellant requests a hearing at a later time convenient to him and
to the board. In the case of appeals from other notices, the appeal shall be
heard at such time as may be established by the board, but the taking of an
appeal from a notice other than one to vacate pending she elimination of im-
minent hazards issued under subdivision 4 shall, durint; the pendency of such
appeal, restrain the city and its officers from proceeding in any manner to
enforce the notice.
Subd. 8. Board of Building, Health, and Fire Apt~eals, The council shall serve
as and constitute the board of building, health and file appeals. All appeals
under this section shall be heard by the board. The mayor, the manager, the
chief inspector and the health officer or sanitarian aid the fire marshall or
marshalls may serve in an advisory capacity as ex~officio members of the board,
At hearings conducted pursuant to this section, r.he enforcing officer shall
present the evidence with respect to the existence of violation, and the ap-
pellant and his attorney may call and cross-examine witnesses and make such
argument with respect to the facts and law as may be relevant to the alleged
violation. The board may obtain the advice of the attorney or his designate
in connection with the conduct of the hearing or. the action to be taken, The
board may act in the absence of any one of its members if such member is not
reasonably available, but in no case shall it act with<~it the affirmative vote
of any two, The board m.o.y,upon the hearing, affirm in thole or in part or
~~
35 ~ /g/r,g
ORDINANCE CODE C! rY c)F RICHFIELD, MINNESO~~A
w
.'.
deny the existence of a violation of tlii:, part, and if a violation is found
to exist, confirm or modify the correcr:ive action to be taken or the other
requiring vacation of t)te premises and the time allowed therefor.
Subd. 9. Correction of Violation by City and Assessment of Cost. In all
cases of violation o.f this part to which iiinnesota Stat~~tes Sections 145.22
to 145.23 are applicable, the enforcing officer m:.iy proceed as therein pro-
vided to abate or remove the violation and, if deemed nF~cessary to have the
cost thereof specially assessed against the lot ~r parcel where the violation
Baas located. In suitable casea, said statutory remedies; and procedure may be
used either concurrently with, or separate from, the procedures prescribed in
this part.
Subd. 10. Unlawful to ]Zesume Occupancy. ,No building, :Iwelling, dwelling unit
or rooming unit which has been designated as unfit for human habitation and
placarded as such shall again be used for human }cabitation until written
approval is secured from, and such placarding is removed by, the enforcing
officer. The enforcing officer shall remove such placard ~.•henever the defect
or defects upon which the designation and placarding ac~-ion were based have
been eliminated and the building, dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit has
been made to conform to the standards estab1is11ed by t}iis part.
Subd. 11. Unlawful to Deface Placard. It shall be unlawful for any person to
deface, remove, or obscure any placard affixed tcrlder tlse provisions of this
part.
3~~ '~/K/~,8
ORDINANCE CODE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
~i
Exhibit Two
NEARING ON APPEAL OF
APPLICATION OF FIRE PRL-'VFNI'ION CODE
Regarding
84 West 78th Street
J. E. Braas - Lessor
GLIDDEN COATINGS ~ RESINS - Lessee
Before The
Richfield City Council
July 28, 1980
M
N
fit'
~~ ~
~i~+
~
• ~~
~
~
^
~~+ ~
Q ~
C
L
~ll^~ Q.
^~ O
O
May 15, 19so
Mr. Bill Johnson
Glidden Paints
2b60 N. Fairview
Roseville, MN 55113
Dear Mr. Johnson:
•
I have inspected your store at 84 West 18th Street and have
reviewed the questions raised by your attorney regarding the
quantities of flammable liquid in the store.
The following requirements must be met for your store to comply
with the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code.
1. An approved sprinkler system must be installed throughout
:the building. The sprinkler alarm must~b e connected
directly to the Richfield Public Safety Dispatch Center.
2. An approved indoor storage room must be constructed for
storage of flammable liquids. It shall be a cut-off
room as defined in NFPA 30.
3. An approved electrical system for hazardous locations
must be installed.
4. An additional exit may be required from the northeast
corner of the building.
5. Approved aisles to existing exits must be maintained.
6. Smoking in the storage areas must be prohitibted, and
this rule must be ~rupulously enforced.
7. Container stacking must meet the requirements of NFPA 30.
These requirements must be met on the following schedule:
1. Plans for items 1, 2 and 3 must be submitted for approval
by June 18, 1980.
2. Items 5, 6 and 7 must be complied with immediately.
3. Item 4 will be contingent on the final exiting plans. We
lN~phone:869-7521 (612)
sn equal opportunity employer
• ~
°'. r Mr. Bill uhnson
Glidden Paints
< ;~• May 15, 1980
Page 2
will review this when we see the location of the inside
'`~ ~ storage room.
When your company representatives met with city officials to
discuss the location of your store, either one side or both
sides misunderstood the nature of the business and the Fire Code
requirements. The Uniform Building Code, 1'976 edition, Section
1602 (c),~states, "No Group H, Division 2 Occupancy having floor
area exceeding 1500 square feet sh311 be permitted in Fire Zone
No. i.
Since the store is now operating and is in Fire Zone No. 1, the
requirements listed above are necessary for the store to continue
to operate at that location. Captain Paul Kaiser is familiar
with this matter and can assist you in my absence.
Sincerely,
/~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ .
L~~J ~ ~ ~~
,~
Patrick J. C• hlin
Asst. Chief ~.) •
Richfield Department of~Public Safety
Fire Division
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
869-2411
PJC:Ikm
.~
.•
. .
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Inter-Office P/1err.c>rar~dum,
PATE July 28, 1980
To Mr. John Dean, City Attorney's Office
FROM Assistant Chief Pat Coughlin, Fire Division
SUBJECT 84 West 78th Street - GLIDDEN PAINTS
The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code basically deals with two aspects of a
structure, what it is constructed of (building type) and who occupies
it (occupancy group).
The building in question is described in the UBC as a "Type II-N". The
'T1" denotes that the structure does not have afire resistance rating.
In this case, it is because the bar joists are not protected. The area
of the building is approximately 6,000 square feet.
The occupancy. group is H-2, since the amount of flammable liquids exceeds
the amount exempted in the UBC.
The building is in Fire Zone 1.
UBC Section 1602 (c) prohibits H-2 occupancies with areas 1,500 square
feet or greater in Fire Zone 1.
I judged it reasonable that Glidden remain in the building if it complied
with the requirements of my letter to Bill Johnson dated May 15, 1980.
In my opinion, compliance with these requirements would reduce the poten-
tial fire hazard in the existing use of the structure to a level comparable
to that of the original use of this structure.
Items #2 through #7 are requirements of the M~JFC. Item #1, a sprinkler
system with an alarm connected directly to our Dispatch Center, would, in
my judgment, reduce the risks of the nearby residents to a level expected
in any building fire.
PC:hf
~ J
t
:.:?]r
1\
$ 3 i Q ~ c ~ r
N
O
C
N
C
O
N
a~
L~
~7
O
c
a~
c
0
N
a~
L~
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 253
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
As the city council ma
vironmental
program and
sibilities.
ers,. ana community service orricers. •1•ne position or ~n-
Health Manager has been maintained to coordinate our health
to handle some of the technically complex inspection respon-
are having difficulty maintaing a quality
the area of inspectional work related to
The food service inspection involves a
cally spec
public safety employees who are conducting other, more routine health
inspections. The city presently has issued approximately sixty food
service licenses. Each of the licensed establishments should be in-
spected on a semi-annual basis, or, more ideally, cn a quarterly basis.
The Environmental Health Manager is not able to personally conduct this
volume of inspections while also coordinating the overall environmental
health program of the city. Therefore, we would like to experiment with
contracting out the specific food service inspection activity to a
private source. The city has received a proposal from Capsule Labora-
tories, which is a division of Economics Laboratorv, Inc., to conduct
tories. However, the proposal we have received from Capsule Laboratories
would seem to satisfy our needs in this rather technically complex area..
Subject: Authorization to Enter into Contract for
Certain Public Health Inspectional Services
Council Letter No. 253 -2- July 28, 1980
The 1980 budget for community health services provided funding
for a part-time intern to assist with a variety of staff support
activities for the Environmental Health Manager. We have not filled
this intern position pending our review of the potential for contract-
ing for food service inspections. Therefore, funds are available
in the 1980 budget to finance contracting of these services for the
balance of the year. It is the recommendation of the Public Safety
Director, in which I concur, that the ci
city manager to enter into a professiona
Capsule Laboratories for a one year peri
will conduct an ongoing evaluation of th
determine if this approach to food servi
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/jf
cc: Public Safety Director
Environmental Health b'lanager
!/
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Off ice of City Manager
Council Letter No. 252
Agenda July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf field
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Regarding Sidewalk
Construction, Xerxes Avenue to
York Avenue in the City of Edina
At the July 14, 1980 city council meeting, Ms. Betty Carr
appeared. before the city council to request their assistance in
requesting the City of Edina to construct sidewalks on the south
side of 66th Street between Xerxes Avenue and York Avenue. Ms.
Carr was concerned that although this is a commercial area, there
are no pedestrian walkways.
The city council requested that a resolution be drafted in-
corporating that request. Attached for council action is a resol-
ution requesting that the City of Edina include the construction
of sidewalks on the south-side of 66th Street between Xerxes Avenue
and York Avenue in their master sidewalk plan.
Respectfully submitted,
I r ~~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
1
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION REGARDING SIDEWALK INSTALLATION
FROM XERXES AVENUE TO YORK AVENUE
WHEREAS, in the interest of health and energy preservation,
more and more people are walking to work or to shop, and
WHEREAS, Xerxes Avenue to York Avenue abutting 66th Street
is adjacent to many commercial operations, and
WHEREAS, as this area has no sidewalks it is dangerous for
pedestrians to walk between Xerxes~Avenue and York Avenue on 66th
Street, and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield is concerned for the safety
and convenience of pedestrians in this area, and
WHEREAS, sidewalks are provided in the City of Richfield up
to Xerxes Avenue, and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is in the process of developing
a master sidewalk plan for the City of Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City
of Richfield that it hereby requests the City of Edina to include the
construction of sidewalks on the south side of 66th Street between
Xerxes Avenue and York Avenue for the safety and convenience of
pedestrians. in its master sidewalk plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield that copies of this resolution be forwarded to the City
Manager and the City Council of the City of Edina.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 28th
day of July, 1980.
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
ATTEST:
5v. via K. Bera Deputy City Clerk
~y
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 251
Agenda July 14, 1980
Deferred July 28, 1980
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Discussion of Field Facilities Expansion
At Metropolitan International Airport
At the June 23, 1980 city council meeting, the city council
briefly discussed the proposed expansion of certain facilities
at the Metropolitan Airport. At that time, the council also ex-
patterns over Richfield. The city council asked the staff to
assemble additional information regarding the proposed expansion
of facilities at the airport, as well as how that expansion will
impact on airport noise levels over Richfield.
There are two major construction projects envisioned at
airport which will most likely have some impact upon the City
Richfield. These include the extension of runway 4-22 and po
the
of
however, in a somewhat increased level of_ hack noise as planes
take off toward northeast (o~~er Highland Park area). In that a
very small number (approximat:ely 1 percent) of the fl_ghts take
off in this direction, the noise impact on the southeastern part
of Richfield will be relatively minimal. It wil]_ be necessary
Council Letter No. 251 -2- July 14, 1980
As passenger loads increase, it is anticipated that a new
west passenger terminal will be constructed to accommodate this
growth. If constructed, this facility could have an impact upon
the New Ford Town area of northeastern Richfield by possibly in-
creasing surface traffic within the city. According to latest
estimates from the Metropolitan Airports Commission, construction
C11 V 1r-V11-
the c ity
The city's Community Development staff will continue to mon-
itor the activities of the Metropolitan Airport Commission and
comment on those which might potentially impact the City of Rich-
f field.
I believe that the
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
cc: Community Development Director
At some time in the future it is also expected that there
will be taxiway developments along the Richfield sides of runways
4-22 and 11R-29L. However, the MAC capital improvement program
does not reflect any taxiway development within the next five
years.
schedule a presentation by a representative of the MAC for the
July 28, 1980 city council meeting.