Loading...
06-01-81 agenda CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 185 Agenda June 1, 1981 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Cedar Avenue Redevelopment Potential A few weeks ago, council members received a copy of a report which examined several issues related to the redevelopment potential of the area adjacent to the 66th Street and Cedar Avenue inter- section. That report was prepared by the Technical Advisory Research Service of the League of Minnesota Cities (TARS). The TARS report discusses the redevelopment potential of the Cedar Avenue Liquor Store site. However, it also addresses a strategy for using development of the liquor store site as a lever for funding renewal activities in the area north of 66th Street on Cedar Avenue. On July 21, 1980, the HRA discussed goals for 1980-81. At that time, it was suggested that the area of 66th Street and Cedar Avenue, especially the mixed land use area to the north, should be studied for possible renewal activities. The TARS report suggests alternatives to achieve this goal. The report will be presented for discussion at the June 1, 1981 city council meeting. The LMC personnel-that worked on the report will be present at that meeting. Respectfully submitted, ,~' Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Community Development Director Housing and Redevelopment Director CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of C ity Manager Council Letter No. 184 Agenda June 1, 1981 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Selection of Developer for L/H/N Multi-Family Site At the May 18, 1981 HRA meeting, the HRA heard two proposals for development of the site designated for development of multi- family housing (southeast corner of 66th Street/Lake Shore Drive intersection). The Knutson Companies had originally proposed to develop a cooperative housing project for people 60 years of age and older. In December, 1980, Congress modified the rules for the financing which had been contemplated for this development, and the project became impractical. Because of Knutson's continued interest in the site, they have now presented a proposal to con- struct 168 condominium units, to be marketed to generally the same age group as the coop. Construction would begin in the fall of 1981. A second proposal for development of the site was presented by McKinley-Brustad. They contemplate construction of 198 units of rental housing to begin in the spring of 1982. It is my recommendation that the council select the proposal made by the Knutson Companies because it best meets the needs of the community at this time, which is to provide alternative housing ownership options for the city's senior citizens. However, this recommendation is based on successfully concluding negotiations on a developer's agreement. The major points on which agreement must be reached are the sale price of the land and the method of payment, date of closing and construction start, number of units and height of building, liquidated damages to the HRA if the pro- ject fails prior to construction, and a tax increment guarantee. At the June 1, 1981 meeting, the city council will be presented with a developer's agreement which addressed the major points ident- ified above. It is recommended that the city council authorize the City Manager and the Mayor to enter into this agreement. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager