06-22-81 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 215
Agenda one 22, 1981
�. I
z
�72 o�
Subject: Approval of 1982 -83 Community Health
Service Plan
In 1976, the State Legislature passed the Community
Health Services Act. The purpose of the act is to develop and
maintain a system of community health services under local
administration. Community health services are those services
provided to protect and improve people's health by preventing
illness, disease and disease disability.
Through this Act, Richfield receives community health
services subsidy funds from the State to support the provision
of services such as community sursing, home health, disease
prevention and control, environmental health, emergency
medical services and health education.
Since 1977, Richfield has contracted with the city of
Bloomington for the provision of personal public health services.
Richfield provides environmental health protection and control
with its own staff. The community health services provided in
Richfield meet the requirements of the state Community Health
Services Act., and have continually qualified for a subsidy.
The Community Health Services Act requires an Advisory
Board of Health to advise, consult with, or make recommendations
to the board of health on matters relating to the development,
maintenance, funding, and evaluation of community health
services. The Advisory Board of Health met on June 15, 1981
and evaluated the Community Health Services plan. The plan was
approved at that time, and the Advisory Board of Health recom-
mended that the city council adopt the attached resolution,
approving the plan and submission of the application for the
community health services subsidy.
Chairperson Charlene Swanell of the Advisory Board of
Health will be present at the June 22, 1981 city council
meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
K Nollenberg
City Manager
cc: Public Safety Director
A RFSOLUTInN AUTIIORI?I`G SliB'!ISSIn.' OF
A PLAN IN APPLTCATTnN FOR A COMMUNITY
HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIPY FOR 1982 -83
WHEREAS, the Cite Council of the City of Richfield is the official
governing body of the City of Pichfield and functions as the official
Board of Health of the City of Richfield: and
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support, and
maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and
It91EREAS , the Community Health Services Act-provides-for subsidies
in support of public health services on the local level throughout the
State of Minnesota; and
MEnEAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Richfield has
reviewed and approved the preliminary plan for the provision of public
health services in the City of Pichfield, and recommends that the City
Council authorize its submission in application for a grant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds this plan consistent with the needs
and priorities of the community as determined by the Advisory Board of
Health and as expressed by the citizens of Richfield-
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RICHFIELD, that the preliminary 1982 -83 Community Health Services Plan for
the City of Richfield is approved and authorization is herehy given to
submit said plan in application for a Community Health Services Act subsidy
for 1982 -83. '
Passed and adopted this 22nd day of June, 1981.
Attest:
Sylvia Bergh City Clerk
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
- 4 -
r-
'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Application for Community Health Services Subsidy------------------ - - - - --
1
Planned Expenditures ---------------------------------------------- - - - - --
2
City CHS Directory ----------------------- ------- ---- ----- --- - - - ---
3
Resolution Authorizing CHS Application ---------------------------- - - - - --
4
Advisory Board of Health Approving CHS Plan------------------------ - - - - --
5
Assurances and Agreements ----------------------------------------- - - - - --
6
Resolution Purchasing Services from Bloomington-------------------- - - - - --
8
Joint Powers Agreement -------------------------------------------- - - - - --
o
'
Resolution Amendment for School Services--------------------------- - - - - --
17
Health Services Agreement with School District--------------------- - - - - --
18
City Council ".embers (Board of Health) & City Charter-------------- - - - - --
20
Advisory Board of health M embers----------------------------------- - - - - --
21
'
Community Participation ------------------------------- ------------ - - - - --
24
Health Services Program Description -------------------------------------
E -1
Administration ---------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Environmental Health
E -4
Food Protection ---------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -5
Housing Maintenance------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -7
Community------------------------------------------
SanitationE
-R
Pollution Control--------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -9
Water Treatment and Laboratory Support Services--------- - - - - --
E -I1
Animal Control-------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------
E -12
Emergency Medical Services----------------------------------- - - - - --
E -13
'
Community Nursing Services----------------------------------- - - - - --
E -14
Home Health Services----------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -15
Disease Prevention and Control Services---------------------- - - - - --
E -16
Health Education -------------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -18
Parent and Child Health-------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -19
'
Budget Detail by Description
Administration and Planning--------------------------------------- - -E -20
Environmental Health ---------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -22
Emergency Medical Services____________________
P -24
Community Nursing Services -----------------------------------------
E -26
Home Nursing Services---------------------------------------- - - - - --
E -23
Parent and Child Health Services-------------------------- --- - - - - --
F -3n
Health Education Services------------------------------------ - - - - --
E -32
Disease Prevention and Control Services---------------------- - - - - --
E -34
r�
APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES SUBSIDY
MINNESOTA STATUTE 145.911- 145.925
IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATIONS
1, NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATION
City of Richfield
' 67(10 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, `IN 55423
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
FOR MDH USE ONLY
CONTROL NUMBER
DATE RECEIVED
1. 6PUN60RING UNITS OF GOVERNMENT 3. FUNDI14G PERIOD
City /County Date Approved
rL L_ 10R?
Month Day Year
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ S
(Total) $ 167,428 184,530 (Total) $ 77,033 177,033
Application is made for a subsidy under the provisions of the Community Health Services 3,ct
of 1976 in the amount and for the purposes stated herein. By signature, the Authorized
Official agrees and has the authority to agree to comply with the conditions and recortina
requirements, consistent with applicable MDH Rules and the Community Health Services ct.
In addition, by signature below, and signature affixed on page 8 -9 of these forms, the
Authorized Official assures full compliance with all items stated herein.
IAuthorized Official
of Title
(Original Signature)
Date
to
'
12 31 1983
Month Day
Year
4.
ALL APPROPRIATE REGIONAL REVIEW
5. DOES THE SPONSORING UNIT(S) OF GOVERN-
AGENCIES LJERE SENT COPIES OF THIS
MENT MAINTAIN A WRITTEN EOUAL EMPLOYMENT
APPLICATION.
OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM?
Yes No Date
( x) Yes ( ) No
RDC
HSA
Date Certified 1/24/77
6.
SUBSIDY REQUEST 1982 $ 77,033
1983 $ 77,033
Name of County(s) /City(s)
Local Participation State Share
1982 1983 1982 1983
City of Richfield
$ 167.4 ?R
_L8,1_510 $ 77.0.1.1 �77 033
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ S
(Total) $ 167,428 184,530 (Total) $ 77,033 177,033
Application is made for a subsidy under the provisions of the Community Health Services 3,ct
of 1976 in the amount and for the purposes stated herein. By signature, the Authorized
Official agrees and has the authority to agree to comply with the conditions and recortina
requirements, consistent with applicable MDH Rules and the Community Health Services ct.
In addition, by signature below, and signature affixed on page 8 -9 of these forms, the
Authorized Official assures full compliance with all items stated herein.
IAuthorized Official
of Title
(Original Signature)
Date
i�Illivr,SO^ DEPART.iE.1T OF HEALTH'
C=—IUTNIT. HEALTH SERVICES SL -3SIDY PLAN
BUDGET REPORT
For the Period 1/1/82 To 12/31/82
Name and Address of Organization:
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PLA= EXPEYDITU? ES :
Procrams
Community Nursing
Services
Hume Health Services
Disease Prevention &
Control Services
Emergency Medical
.,. Services
Health Education
Environmental Health
CHS Administration
Other (Speci�y)
Parent & Child Health
TOTAL -- Planned Expenditures
TOTAL -- Less In -riind
Contributions
Con `ro I ,. O . 1
BLLGE'T' ,
(�) Original
(_) Revised
Other Local CL.S
II. CERTI:
r
t
r
CHS DIRECTORY
1. CHS ADMINISTRATOR
Name Karl Nollenher,ger
Title City Manager
Agency City of Richfield
Address 6700 Portland Ave. S.
Area Code /Phone Number
(612)869 -7521
3. AUTHORIZED OFFICI'..L
(If different from =1)
Name
Title
Agency
Address
Area Code /Phone Number
2. FISCAL :!ANAGIFMENT OFFICER
(Individual /Agency where payment
should be sent)
Name Jovice i'Jilde
Title Administrative Services Director
Agency City of Pichfield
Address 67nn Portland Ave. S.
Area Code /Phone Number (612)R69 -7521
4. PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CONTRACTS
(If different from 01 & 43)
Name
Title
Agency
Address
Area Code /Phone Number
CHAIRPERSON, LOCAL BOARD OF HEALTH 6. CHAIRPERSON, CHS ADVISORY CO.!:-;ITTEE
Name Donald J. Priebe Name Charlene Swanell
Address 7225 Bloomington Ave. S. Address 622n 4th Ave. S.
County of Residence Hennepin County of Residence Hennepin
Area Code /Phone Number Area Code /Phone Number (612)866 -8948
(612)869 -4186 or 452 -1500
7. DESIGNEE, STATE CHS ADVISORY 8. MEDICAL CONSULTANT
COMMITTEE
Name W. H. Bittick, M.D.
Name I. F. Roesler
Address 6700 Portland Ave. S. address 702 Medical Arts Building
County_ of Residence
County of Residence Dakota
Area Code /Phone Number (612)339 -3874
Area Code /Phone Number
(612)869 -7521
.vote: Revisions oz t e above during the subsidy period 1982/198-3 s: ^.ould be
submitted cromptiv to the District Reoresentative _.. :'our area.
- 3 -
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUB"1ISSION OF
A PLAN IN APPLICATION FOR A CONSVINITY
11EALTIi SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY FOR 1982 -83
MIERF.AS, the City Council of the City of Richfield is the official
governing body of the City of Pichfield and functions as the official
Board of health of the City of Richfield: and
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support, and
maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and
11,11EREAS, the Community health Services Act provides for subsidies
in support of public health services on the local level throughout the
State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the Citv of Richfield has
reviewed and approved the preliminary plan for the provision of public
health services in the City of Richfield, and recommends that the City
Council authorize its submission in apnlication for a grant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds this plan consistent with the needs
and priorities of the community as determined by the Advisory Board of
Health and as expressed by the citizens of Richfield:
NONE, THEREFORE
RICHFIELD, that the
the City of Richfie
submit said plan in
for 1982 -83.
BE IT RESOLVED BY
preliminary 1982 -
ld is approved and
application for a
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
g3 Community Health Services Plan for
authorization is hereby given to
Community Health Services Act subsidy
Passed and adopted this 22nd day of June, 1981.
Attest:
Sylvia Bergh City Clerk
I
Donald J. Priebe 'Mayor
- 4 -
ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS
BY SIGNATURE, THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL AGREES AND ASSURES THAT:
I
1. The agency will comply with state and federal requirements for equal
opportunity employment.
2. The agency will comply with state and federal requirements relating to
confidentiality of patients information.
3. If vaccines are supplied by the Department of Health the amount of the
Community Health Services subsidy will be reduced accordingly.
4. The Department of Health will be provided with information referenced
in Part I, A, 1 (a -e), and 2 (a -e), of the 1982 -1983 Forms and
Instructions, where applicable.
5. Any Health Advisory Committee or Health Task Force of any Human Services
Board Advisory Committee, where applicable (MN Stat. 402.03), shall meet
the composition and reporting requirements of the Community Health
Services Advisory Committee required by MN Stat. 145.913 (3).
6. The agency will comply with all standards relating to fiscal accounta-
bility that apply to the Minnesota Department of Health, specifically:
a. The local participation funds identified in the budget submission
meet the following tests as well as 7 MC.AR 9 1.451:
1) Cash contributions are cash outlays, including the outlay of
money contributed by other public agencies and institutions
and private organizations and individuals.
2) In -:find /Direct Assistance contributions represent the value of
non -cash contributions provided by (1) the applicant (2) other
public agencies and institutions, and (3) private organizations
and individuals. Such goods and services directly benefit and
are specifically identifiable to Community Health Services pro-
grams, and are identifiable from the applicant's records.
Specifically the number of hours of volunteer services are
supported by the same methods used by the agency for its employees
and the basis for determining charges for personal services,
supplies and expenses are documented.
b. Budget revisions will be submitted to the Commissioner for prior
approval wherever:. (CHS Policy No. 4 (5/1/73))
1) Changes are made in the objectives to be met in the Community
Health Services program, or;
2) The proposed revision involves the addition of key administrative
personnel not previously approved in the Plan, or;
3) The cumulative amount of funds transferred exceeds or is ex-
pected to exceed 104 or $2,500.00, whichever is greater, of the
approved total Community Health Services Plan budce` (excluding
Supplemental)
C. Rencrts of Exr;endi_ares will ce led ,aith the Ccmmissicner of 'rea'_t- f
on :orms provided no later tnar. 45 days
_ _
of eac:
calendar 'ear garter. _
-
6 -
r
- 7-
d. Subsidy funds are used as payment for services only after third
party payments, such as Titles XVIII, XIX, and XX or private
insurance resources are utilized.
e. Financial Management Systems provide for:
1) Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial
results of each activity.
2) Records that identify adequately the source and application of
'
funds for subsidy supported activities. These records contain
information pertaining to subsidy awards and authorizations,
obligations, unobligated balances, liabilities (encumbrances),
outlays, and income.
'
3) Effective control over the accountability for all funds, property
and other assets. Subsidy applicants adequately safeguard such
assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purpose.
4) Comparison of actual obligations with budget amounts for each
activity.
5) Accounting records that are supported by source documentation.
6) Audits that that will be made by or at the direction of the subsidy
applicant /Department of Health to determine, at a minimum, the CHS
subsidy that will be retained until audited, with the following
qualifications:
aa) The records will be retained beyond this period if audit
findings have not been resolved.
bb) Records for non - expendable property which was acquired
with subsidy funds will be retained for three years after
its final disposition.
'
AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL
'
TITLE City Manager
Tune 22,
DATE 1981
1
46Q -7521
r
- 7-
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
1
- 8 -
I
RESOLUTION NO. 5639
RESOLUTION REGARDING THE PURCHASE OF
4k
PERSONAL HEALTH SERVICES FROM
THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
'
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield is the official governing
body of the City of Richfield and functions as the official Board of Health of the
City of Richfield, and
I'MERF.AS, the city council is committed to promote, support, and maintain
the health of the entire community at the highest level, and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield has been exploring the-possibility of
purchasing personal health services from the City of Bloomington, and
WHEREAS, the city manager has prepared a report describing those services
which would be included in the purchase of services from the City of Bloomington,
and
WHEREAS, the city council.has reviewed these services in terms of the health
needs and priorities of the community as expressed by the citizens of Richfield,
and
WHEREAS, the city council finds that the purchase of services from the
City of Bloomington would provide more and better personal health services to
Richfield resi -ents than the personal health services presently provided.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City_ of
Richfield that the City purchase personal health services from the City of
'
Bloomington effective January 1, 1977, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city council does authorize the city manager
to negotiate a contract for services agreement with the City of Bloomington providi
for the delivery of these personal health services to Richfield residents.
,
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield on this 8th day of
November, 1976.
Loren L Law Mayor
ayor
ATTEST:
Thomas J. Moran City Clerk
1
- 8 -
1
r
JOINT P0-0,11711S 7,GREE' L L11T
THIS AGREEMENT, ;Wade and entered into this 1St clay of January I
1991, by and
corporation,
( "Bloomingt.o
corporation,
("Richfield"
between the CITY
in the County of
a ") and the CITY
in the County of
OF BLOOMINGTCN, a Minnesota municipal
Hennepin, State of Minnesota
:)F RICHFIELD, a �;innesota municipal
Hennepin, State of I•iinnesota
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of
Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating in
accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements; and
WHEREAS, Bloomington's Division of Public Health provides comm-
unity health services, including, but not limited to home nursing,
adult health, child services, information and education, school age
services, health promotion counseling, community center services,
prevention and control, and program administration; and
WHEREAS, Richfield wishes to promote, support, and maintain the
' health of its residents by providing community health services such
as health education, communicable disease programs, nursing services,
health assessment, counseling teaching, and evaluation in the comm-
unity, home, and clinic setting at a nominal fee to those making use
of such services, and to contract with Bloomington for Bloomington,
through its Division of Public Health, to provide such services to
residents of Richfield and
- 9 -
Page 2
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of Bloomington and Richfield
are authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.91.4, Subdivision
5, Section 145.917, Subdivision 3, and by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 471.59, to provide community health services and to enter
into agreements with each other for the providing by Bloomington
of community health services to residents of Richfield.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for and in consideration of
the convenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows:
1. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees
to provide residents of Richfield with the following community
health services ( "Health Services''), as identified in the Bloomington
Health Program budget:
A. Home Nursing: This activity provides professional
nursing care in the home under medical supervision for persons re-
quiring personal care, treatment, teaching or supervision of medical
surgical conditions.
�-
B. Adult Service s: This activity provides health supervision
for adults in the areas of maternal health and family planning.
Physical assessments, laboratory work, iTmulogicwl update, teaching
r
and referral are provided in all clinic settings.
C. Child Services: This activity provides child health
clinics for infants and children in the areas of well child, early
periodic screening, and nutrition services.
D. Information and Education: This activity provides for
coordination and delivery of health information and education to the
general public and organized groups by the staff and other available
resources. In addition, it includes current health information and
- 10 - - -
Page 3
1
and validation of health certificates for world travel.
E. School Age Services: This activity provides for
coordination, consultation, and delivery of in- school services
within school settings.
F. Health Promotion Counseling: This activity provides
preventive and restorative health teaching and counseling to in-
di.vi.duals on a one to one basis in all areas of physical and
' emotional health, including alcohol -drug realted counseling.
G. Community Center Services: This activity provides
health services at the community centers through individual teach-
ing and counseling, health supervision clinics, injection and
treatments as percribed by P rivate physicians, and detection P
re-
Veni:ion and control programs.
H. Prevention and Control: This activity provides services
for the prevention and control of cummunicable diseases and adult
screening clinics for early identification and referral of chronic
diseases.
1. Proaram Administration: This activity reflects adminis-
trative support costs to all activities of the D.vision of Public
Ff, _,alth unidentified as to specific discipline.
2. The Health Services shall be provided and rendered hereunder
to the residents of Richfield in the same manner, to at least the
1 same extent, and with at least the same quality and kind of personnel,
crluipment, and facilities as the Health Services are provided and
rr:ridercd to residents of Bloomington, it being the intent and pur-
1;•� -;e of this Agreement to provide and render the Health Services
to residents of Bloomington and Richfield, without
Page 4
discrimination in any way.
3. Bloomington shall provide the health services pursuant
hereto on a confiden:.ial basis, using capable, trained professionals. ,
4. All health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington
shall
be rendered pursuant to
and subject to public health policies,
rules,
and procedures now or
hereafter, from time to time, adopted by
the Bloomington City Council,
and in full compliance with all appli-
cable
state and federal laws,
provided however, that (i) no policy,
,
rule,
or procedure hereafter
adtoped by the Bloomington City Council
shall
in any v ay affect, modify,
or 'change the obligations, duties,
liabilities, or rights of the
parties hereto as set out in this
Agreement, or reduce or detract from the kind, quality, and cruantity
of Health Services to be provided hereunder by Bloomington to resi- d
dents of Richfield, and (ii) all such policies, rules and procedures
shall be uniformly applied to all persons receiving Health Services ,
from Bloomington, whether residents of Richfield, Bloomington, or any
Richfield agrees to adopt the same policies, rules,
other municipality. _ g
and procedures as are from time to time adopted by Bloomington, if de-
termined by Richfield to be necessary or desirable to facilitate or
or regulate the provision of health Services by Bloomington to re-
sidents of Richfield pursuant hereto.
5. Richfield agrees to pay to Bloomington, for the provision
of Health Services pursuant hereto, amounts and on terms as follows: '
A. The annual sum of $94,528 shall be paid in quarterly
payments of $23,632 to Bloomington within fifteen (15) days of the '
receipt by Richfield of each of the reports to be given pursuant to
Paragraph 5.B hereof, subject, however, to the provisions of paragraph
S.C. hereof. 1
- 12 -
Page 5
B.
On April 15, July
15,
and October 15,
1981, and on
January 15,
1982, Bloomington
shall
send Richfield
a statement,
the kinds of Health Services delivered, the locations where such
services were delivered, and such other information as Richfield
shall reasonably request.
C. No payment or payments need be made by Richfield under
this Agreement while Bloomington is in default under any of the terms
and conditions hereof to be by Bloomington performed.
6. In the event Richfield desires to inspect the financial
books and records of Bloomington relating to the providing of Health
Services hereunder by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its finan-
cial books and records available at the Bloomington City Hall for in-
'
certified by
the person in charge of Bloomington's
Division of
Public Health
as being true and correct, and covering
the period of
t7.
the three (3)
calendar months preceding the month
in which the re-
port is given,
and setting forth, in such detail
as Richfield from
time to time
shall reasonably require, the number
of persons served,
the kinds of Health Services delivered, the locations where such
services were delivered, and such other information as Richfield
shall reasonably request.
C. No payment or payments need be made by Richfield under
this Agreement while Bloomington is in default under any of the terms
and conditions hereof to be by Bloomington performed.
6. In the event Richfield desires to inspect the financial
books and records of Bloomington relating to the providing of Health
Services hereunder by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its finan-
cial books and records available at the Bloomington City Hall for in-
'
spection
and copying by
Richfield, or any agent, employee, or repre-
sentative
of Richfield,
at reasonable business hours.
t7.
It shall be the
sole responsibility of Bloomington to deter-
mine the
qualifications,
functions, training, and performance standards
for all health
service personnel
who render Health Services under this
Agreement; provided, however, that Bloomington agrees that all such
personnel shall be capable, trained professionals.
8. Bloomington's Division of Public Health will communicate with
Richfield relative to Health Services to be performed hereunder by
Bloomington, such conununication to be in the form of reports, con-
' ferences, or consultations, as the respective Richfield departments
- 13 -
the last quarterly report required by paragraph 5.B. hereof. Also,
at Richfield request, made not more than two (2) times during the
term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of
Bloomington's Division of Public Health shall attend meetings of
the Richfield City Council or appropriate board or commission to
r
1.
answer questions and give further information relative to the
activities performed and Health Services rendered under this Agreement..
10. Bloomington hereby agrees to maintain in force its present I
policy of comprehensive liability insurance and medical malpractice
insurance in the minimum amount of five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000), for the term of this contract. A copy of the policy or '
policies issued shall be furnished to Richfield. Said policy shall
be with an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota. ,
1
- 14 -
Page 6
.
1
from time to time shall request. All rcports relating to the
providing of health Services that are given by Bloomington's
Division of Public health to the Bloomington City Council or to
,
the City Manager during the term of this Agreement shall also,
and at the same time, be given to Richfield.
r
9. Bloomington also agrees to send to Richfield an annual
,
report describing the activities performed and health Services
rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such report shall be in such
detail and form as Richfield may reasonably from time to time re-
quest. The annual report shall be'sent with and in addition to
the last quarterly report required by paragraph 5.B. hereof. Also,
at Richfield request, made not more than two (2) times during the
term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of
Bloomington's Division of Public Health shall attend meetings of
the Richfield City Council or appropriate board or commission to
r
1.
answer questions and give further information relative to the
activities performed and Health Services rendered under this Agreement..
10. Bloomington hereby agrees to maintain in force its present I
policy of comprehensive liability insurance and medical malpractice
insurance in the minimum amount of five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000), for the term of this contract. A copy of the policy or '
policies issued shall be furnished to Richfield. Said policy shall
be with an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota. ,
1
- 14 -
Page 7
11. This Agreement shall be for a period from January 1, 1981,
to December 31, 1981, provided that either party may terminate the
same by thirty (30) days' written notice to the other. Upon such
rtermination, all obligations and liabilities of the parties here-
under shall cease and terminate, except that the provisions of
paragraph 11 hereof shall continue and survive such termination.
Also, in the event of termination pursuant hereto, the quarterly
payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period
ended on the date of termination, and Bloomington shall send to
Richfield, within thirty (30) days after such termination, a report
in -the form required by paragraph 5.B., and shall also then send a
' final report in the form of, and in lieu of, the annual report re-
quired by paragraph 10 hereof, and Richfield shall pay such reduced
quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination,
within fifteen (15) days after receipt of both of such reports.
12. Bloomington and Richfield understand and agree that
each of them shall apply and qualify, independently and seperately,
for any and all grants, matching funds, and payments of all kinds
from state, federal, and other governmental bodies relating to, or
for the provision of, any or all of the health Services, and any and
all such grants, matching funds, and payments shall belong to the
recipient and be used and applied as the recipient thereof shall
determine, without regard to this Agreement.
13. All notices, reports, or demands required or permitted to
be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
to be given when delivered personally to any officer of the art to
P Y
which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States
mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or certified mail, postage
J
w
Page 8
prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following addresses:
To Bloomington: 2215 West Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
Attention: John G.Pedgeon, City Manager
To Richfield: 6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Attention: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager
Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the
other party given as herein provided.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be duly executed and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
By 1 :7
is ay
and��
Its i y a1�r
CTT OOF RICHFI .,D
•f
By
14-'s'14 yor
and
Its City Manager
- 16
ANE'!'2DME":T TO CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITIES OF RICHFIELD AND BLOOMMINGTON FOR
CO,4r,1UNITY HEALTH SEI:VICES
WHEREAS, Independent School District No 280 has applied
for supplemental subsidies for nonpublic schools according to
: the provisions of Minnesota Statutes H 123.931 to 123.935 to
rprovide additional health services to nonpublic schools in the
rDistrict and is providing those subsidies to the City of Richfield:
and
WHEREAS, the parties to the above agreement wish to amend
said agreement to reflect those additional services:
rNOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the parties that the
City of Richfield will increase the quarterly payments according
to the existing contract with the City of Bloomington to raise
the level of health services in the elementary and secondary non-
public schools to equal, but not to exceed, those provided in the
rpublic schools.
Dated: March 23, 1981
r
CITY F RICIIFI D
By
' ts^ Mayor
° [SEAL]
r
By
Its City Managdr
i
rCITY OF BLOOMINGTON
r
iIn
By
NJ
- 17 -
W.
HEALTH SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEr- !E':T, made and entered into this lst day of January
I
1981 , by and between the City of Richfield, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (hereinafter the "City "), and Independent School District
No. 280 (hereinafter the "School District "); I
WITNESSETH: 1
WHEREAS, the School District, in order to promote equal educa-
tional opportunity for every school child in the School District and
to assure all pupils and their parents freedom of choice in educa-
tion, has applied for health service subsidies as provided for by
Minnesota Statutes H 123.931- 123.937; and ,
WHEREAS, the City has an existing contract for the provision of
community health services which includes provision of coordination,
consultation, and delivery of health services within the school set -.
ting of nonpublic elementary and secondary schools in the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
mutual benefits the parties agree to perform the following duties ,
with the intent of this contract:
1. School District Responsibilities '
A. The School District shall apply for each school term
to the Minnesota State Department of Education; State
Aids Section, for those subsidies made available to fund
health services in nonpublic schools.
B. The School District shall provide those subsidies app-
licable to provide health services to nonpublic pupils
to the City.
- 18 -
1
CITY COUNCIL
(BOARD OF HEALTH)
CITY OF RICHFIELD
I
Donald J. Priebe, "•favor
7225 Bloomington Avenue South Home: 869 -8186
Richfield, Minnesota S5423 Office: 681 -5231
Howard Bunce
- 20 -
7608 Sheridan Avenue South Home: 866 -6418
Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Office: 888 -9541
Juanita Collins
6737 Clinton Avenue South Home: 869 -1582
Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Office: 835 -2320
'
Donald Hassenstab
7120 Irving Avenue South Home: 869 -4012
Richfield, "Minnesota 55423 Office: 292 -8860
Ivan Ludeman
6304 Harriet Avenue South home: 866 -5460
Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Office: 861 -8290
'
CITY CHARTER OF THE CITY OF RICE {FIELD
CHAPTER 2
Form Government
of
Sec. 2.01. Form of Government. The form of government established by
this charter is the "Council - `tanager Plan ". The council shall exercise the
legislative power of the city and determine all matters of policy. The city
manager shall be the head of the administrative branch of the city government
and shall be responsible to the council for the proper administration of all
affairs relating to the city.
'
Sec. 2.02. Boards and commissions. 'Micro shall be no separate
administrative board of health, lihrary hoard, Park board, or any—o—flier
administrative hoard or commission except for existing civil service commis-
sions and hoards and for the administration of a function iointly with anotler
political subdivision. The council shall e and perform the ( cities and
exercise the nowers of such hoards and commissions. Vie council may, however,
'
establish hoards or commissions to advise the council with respeFt to any
municipal function or activity, to investi ,-ate any subiect of interest to the
city, or to nerforrr nuasiiudiicial functions.
- 20 -
Page 2
C. The School District shall plan and coordinate with
the health services provider so that the provision
of such services meets the state provisions and is
provided in a ration not to exceed that provided in
the public schools.
2. City Responsibilities
A.
M.
The City shall amend its City Health Plan and contract
with its health services provider to include health
services according to the provisions of the state
statutes.
The City shall provide to the health services provider
the subsidies from the School District necessary to
enhance the level of health services in nonpublic
schools equal to, but not to exceed, those provided in
the public schools.
IN TESTIMIO�IY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above mentioned.
CITY F RICHFI�L _
By
Its Mayor
By
Its Cit Mena er
It
t
Y
INDEPENENT SCHOOL DI -TRICT NO.280
By
Its' Chairman
Y ��-
Its Superintendent
- 19 -
i1
ADVISORY BOARD OF 11FALT11
First
Appointed
Provider k1s. Charlene Swanell 1979
r
Term of
Office
2 years
Term
Expires
January 1983
1930 2 years . January 1982
1981 2 years January 1983
1977 2 years January 1983
1981 2 years January 1983
1980 2 years January 1982
1940 2 years January 1982
1980 2 years January 1982
1941 2 vears Januar,,, 1983
- 21 -
Chairperson
6220 Fourth Ave. S.
Richfield, "-I 55423
866 -6948
Consumer
Stuart K. Swanson
Vice Chairperson
710 Fourth Ave. S.
Richfield, PN 55423
'
869 -0384
Consumer
Ms. Charlotte Anderson
'
6420 Vincent Ave. S.
Richfield, PNI 55423
869 -8027
'
Provider
Dr. W. H. Bittick
702 Medical Arts Bldg.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
'
339 -3874
Consumer
Ms. Marian J. Rochnke
7321 Blaisdell Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
869 -8923
' - -
Provider
David t4. .Johnson
2900 West 71'-2 St.
Richfield, 11N, 55423
'
866 -0433 - 347 -2429
Consumer
Charles T. Jones
70n7 Oliver Ave. S.
Richfield, PN 55423
869 -8980 - 871 -1418
Provider
!its. Lia Ozols
2012 h1est 68th St.
Richfield, PN 55423
'861-3936
Provider
Sharon Thorns
6817 Knox Ave. S.
Richfield, IN SS423
866 -9387
r
Term of
Office
2 years
Term
Expires
January 1983
1930 2 years . January 1982
1981 2 years January 1983
1977 2 years January 1983
1981 2 years January 1983
1980 2 years January 1982
1940 2 years January 1982
1980 2 years January 1982
1941 2 vears Januar,,, 1983
- 21 -
Staff Liaison:
I. F. Roesler, Environmental
Health
Manager
13812 Steven Rd.
(H)
89n -3979
Burnsville, MN 55337
(B)
869 -7521
Yvonne Harkens, Personal Health Adm.,
City of Bloomington
9060 Starring Ln.
(H)
941 -3234
Eden Prairie, M 55343
(B)
881 -5811, Ext. 286
City Council Liaison:
Juanita Collins
6737 Clinton Ave. S.
(II)
869 -1587
Richfield, ' +N 55423
Alternate -
Thomas Morgan, Jr.
(ii)
866 -1837
6913'Chicago Ave. S.
(B)
869 -7521
Richfield, NN, 55423
- 22 -
Representative to State Community Health Services Advisory Committee:
'1. F. Roesler
Environmental Health `tanager
' City of Richfield
Alternate:
David 11. Johnson
Advisory Board of health
City of Richfield
Physician providing medical consultation:
Wilbur 11. Bittick, M.D.
' Health Officer
City of Richfield
Director of Personal Health:
Yvonne Ilargens
City of Bloomington
Environmental Health Planager:
' I. F. Roesler
City of Richfield
23 -
CO'VINITY PARTICIPATION I
OVERVIEW OF LOCAI. PARTICIPATION
The Primary citizen involvement in development of the Richfield Com-
munity Health Services (C.H.S.) plan is through the Richfield Advisory
Board of Health. This board was established in January, 1077 as an '
advisory commission to the Richfield City Council acting as the city's
Board of Health. The Advisory Board of Health discussed the planning
process for formulation of the C.H.S. and the final plans were drafted I
by city staff during the discussions.
The City of Richfield provides public health programs by contract and
direct services. The City of Bloomington nursing service, through
t
contract, provides services for community nursing, home health, disease
prevention and control, parent and child health and education. Direct
services in environmental health include food protection, housing main-
tenance, community sanitation and pollution control. Emergency medical
service is provided by firemem and police officers of the city.
Staff meetings, inservice training and development are provided for all
,
levels of employees to assess and evaluate community health services.
Statistics and surveys are reviewed by the staff and /or the Advisory
Board of Health.
'
SIJMkVkRY OF PRIORITY 'NEEDS
The City of Richfield purchased nursing services in the early 1950's.
�'II
The personal health programs provided by the nursing service have in-
creased in scone from home care and immunizations to include a variety
of other programs to conform to changing community needs. Direct
'
environmental health protection began in 1960 with primary concern
directed to food protection and community waste control. Currently
it encompasses program areas to include, in addition, housing and other
'
community environmentally related problems.
The Advisory Board of Iiealth met six times during the year to discuss '
needs and benefits of the personal and environmental health programs.
The City of Richfield nuarterly Report and newsletters, along with the
Richfield Sun newspapers, contained articles on Pertinent health infor-
mation. Clinic schedules have been posted as part of an awareness program. ,
During 1980 -41 the South Hennepin Human Services Council made a needs
assessment survey of the Richfield area. The results will be published '
during the third quarter of 1991. Preliminary reports appear to confirm
and /or establish health needs. As expected successfully operated lar -e
scale Personal and environmental health programs drew little public I
attention.
A number of quality assurance courses for food supervisors and managers
were conducted and several Richfield food facility operators attended the
sessions.
- 24 -
L
I- INTRODUCTION - COMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS
A. PROBLE11 STATE`iENT
The quality of life in the City of Richfield will diminish and
deteriorate unless the comprehensive environmental and nersonal
health services as identified within the selected activities in-
cluded in this nlan are not maintained at least at the present
level.
S. Incidence of communicable disease
6. Unnecessary institutionalization
' 7. Health and social problems due to undetected treatable conditions
S. unawareness of health information and resources.
D. kIFTIIODS
The City of Richfield will use the services of a wide range of pro-
! E -1
All activities included in this elan are eligible for funding under
provisions of the Community Health Act. All of these activities are
integrated and dependent upon one another to ensure the hest possible
services, necessary to maintain the present quality of life.
R. GOALS
The programs included in this plan are defined and provided in
accordance with the exnressed desire of the citizens of the City of
Richfield, as articulated through the Advisory Board of Health and
'
the Board of Health.
The Community Health Service activities outlined in this plan are
designed to facilitate a healthful environment for the physical,
mental and social well -being of Richfield residents. Through
organized community effort, and the administration of this compre-
hensive program by trained health professionals, these services will
provide for the community a state of well - being, beyond the mere absence
of'infirmity.
C. OBJECTIVES
To provide comprehensive public health services to promote the re-
duction of:
1. Air, water and noise pollution
'
2. Foodborne disease
3. Public health hazards, nuisances, rodents and noxious weeds
4. Inadequate and unsafe housing conditions
S. Incidence of communicable disease
6. Unnecessary institutionalization
' 7. Health and social problems due to undetected treatable conditions
S. unawareness of health information and resources.
D. kIFTIIODS
The City of Richfield will use the services of a wide range of pro-
! E -1
fessional public health workers with the educational and experience
qualifications to continue implementation of the goals and objectives
described in the community health plan.
Surveillance, maintenance, education, screening, information, referrals,
visits, clinics, and all other public health practices will be con-
tinued and, when indicated, expanded, to ensure the health and safety
of the community. The environmental and personal health services
will be coordinated in all areas to maximize efforts toward attainment
of the goals and objectives.
Community health services are part of the complex total city operation.
These health services are complemented by support services of the
other city departments to promote public health protection for Richfield
residents.
The City of Richfield Environmental health Program delivery will
continue to provide inspection and enforcement services. First
organized in 1960, it has continually expanded to fill the need for
that service. An Environmental IIealth Pdanager and adjunct personnel
from city fire and police force provide the service. Food inspectional
services are conducted by contract with Capsule Laboratories of St.
Paul and coordinated by the Environmental health Manager. The proposed
C.H.S. plan also included water treatment and animal control within
the Environmental health activities. Emergency medical services are
provided through the fire division of the city and are supported by
police and a private ambulance service. All activities are functionally
administered through the Public Safety department with water treatment
plant operations provided through the community services department.
A contract for services has been negotiated with the City of Bloom-
ington Public Health Division to provide services in the area of
home nursing, home health service, disease prevention and control,
parent and child health and health education, as described in this
plan. The contract with Bloomington stipulates reporting procedures,
services provided and funds expended. By initiating this contract
for service aggreement with an established health agency, the City of
Richfield has been able to minimize expensive start -up and admin-
istrative costs which might he necessary if the city created a new
public health program, and commit our additional resources into the
health care itself. This contract provides a significantly wider range
of services in the area of personal health than were available to
Richfield residents previous to implementation of the C.H.S. plan in
1977. The 1982 -83 C.N.S. Plan provides for continuation of existing
personal health services at essentially the current level.
E. EVALUATION
Estimates and proiections are made for service levels. Results are
analyzed-to assess trends and cost ratios. Tliese output measures will
provide the basic criteria to measure the success achieved by the
methods. Standard public health nursing; statistics are collected
and time studies are done to facilitate public policy and cost analysis.
�. _,...
E-2
CITY OF RICHFIELD," MINNESOTA
Inter - Office Memorandum
DATE June 25, 1981
TO Director Morgan
FROM Agent V. Lambert
SUBJECT Video Equipment Proposals
Regarding the - .additional expense of installing remote arming
and un- arming devices for the City Hall video system, the
best estimate prior to installation for the additional cost
is approximately $200.00. You can add that to the proposal
figure of $5,765.00.
Concerning the second proposal for a semi- portable system to
be used by the Public Safety Division, I neglected at the time
of writing the specifications to include a small black and white
monitor for remote use: The additional cost for such a monitor
will be approximately $250.00. Also, it did not occur to me
at the time I wrote the specifications for the proposal that
this equipment should'be housed in some type of sturdy transport
case to preserve it during moves from one location to another.
The cost of such cases is being explored now by Video Images,
however; I would estimate that it would run in the neighborhood
of $200.00 or so. Perhaps a more realistic figure for the
second proposal for the portable equipment would be in the
area of $5,500.00.
If you have any additional questions on this matter please
contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
Agent V. Lambert
VKL:lkm
9909 Valley View Road -- Eden Prairie, 1`N 55344
(612) 9111_ -.C) -)
Member V.N.A.
Date: may 15, 1981
elivery 45 Days
Submitted To: Richfield Public Safety Department Delivery:-45-
6700 Portland Fve. So. Terms: Net 15
Richfield, NIA' 5504 F.O.B. Minneapolis
Attn : Vau .
Lambert
ITEM
QUAN.
MODEL
DESCRIPTION
UNITPRICE
TOTAL
1.
2
V-N -1054A
Panasonic 2/3" Newvicon Camera (Body
Cnly) without Lens, Internal Line
Locked Random Interlace: 24V 6o n
735.00
1,470.00
2,
1
KF -85A
Panasonic Wide Angle Lens, 8.5 1!y
F 11.5 with Auto Iris
350.00
3.
1
YP-16A
Panasonic, 16 W, F/1.6 Standard Auto
Iris Lens
320.00
4.
1
TC3251
RCA z" Time Lapse Video Cassette.
Recorder with P)uilt in "L'ime Date
Generator, Alarm Time memory arid, On
Tape Alarm Identification
3,585.00
5.
J-
W -7015
Wall Pracket, Light. Wt Euty, Tncloor
25,00
6.
1
TC1460A./2
RCA Vidialert Motion Detector, 2
Channel
675.00
7.
1
VI Custorn
Video ima ;es 2 Channel Switcher
2gti .0'0
8.
1
V8660H
Vicon Ceiling Friclosure W/mounti.ng
Fails V86E01141R and 'iamper Proof' Lock
105.00
This proposal as presented by Video Images is firm until June 15, 181
Proposal
Total 1 $ r 765.00,
Submitted lyr;
Brad W,-wren
WE HEREBY ACCEPT this proposal and agree to purchase the Items as listed above and on any continuation
pages attached
hereto in accordance with the terms and provisions set forth on both sides hereof.
Company:
_
SHIP TO:
P.O. No.
Authorized Agent:
X
Title:
rlafa•
Member V.N.A.
PROPOSAL CONTINUATION Date Fay 1�,, 1981 _ Page I of
NAME OF CUSTOMER R1 hficl _ Dibl ic Safety )e admen;
ITEM
QUAN.
MODEL
DESCRIPTION
UNITPRICE
TOTAL
'Y-ansformer
2C.00
10.
Cable and Connectors
100.00
ll .
Tn talla.tior Not To Exceed
5C . CO
_ Grand Total
.I
��7, �c1i , 00
Package Price
F- 7 c- 00
' Minnesota Office
Alarm Services Department/3M
1 100 Second'�Iw -t:l Soulh
Minneapolis, Minnuwla 55415
612/3320321 Busuws:; Office
612/339 742.1 G.ri wl Syron
June 11, 1981
Department of Public Safety
6700 Portland
Richfield, MN 55423
Attn: Vaughn Lambert
Dear Investigator Lambert:
ALTVi2AliA'r"E 10911POSAL-
The following is a proposal for the Closed Circuit TV System that you
requested:
1 Javelin S131940 camera
1 Javelin SP1840 camera
2 Javelin PS1824 24 volt transformer
1 Javelin JA0813 lens °-
1 Javelin LL915A automatic iris lens
1 Javelin V8660I-I ceiling mount housing
1 Javelin V866 FM rail kit for drop ceiling
1 Javelin J 49B camera bracket
1 Javelin XL6001A video tape recorder
1 RCA TC1460/2 video motion detector
1 Magnacroft W120X -14 SPDT 12VDC class 120 min.
coaxial relay
1 RCA TC2117 -01 rack mount
2 Key switches in plates with LED
1 12 volt power supply with housing
6 LED's and 2 DPDT toggle switches to be mounted
in console by others
The price for this system with be $9303.00 plus tax.
The cost of using the RCA 'IC1460/4 4 chanel video motion detector in
place of the RCATC1460 /2 2 chapel video motion detector would be an
additional $322.50.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me
at 332 -0321.
Sincerely,
R. Fisk
Installation Supervisor
RAF /t-i
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Inter - Offir,e Mer..nranrNw.
DATE May 4, 1 981
To Director T. Morgan
FROM Agent V. Lambert
SUBJECT SURVE I LIAINCE SYSTFNI FOR C i TY HALL
As a result of the recent problems experienced by City Ball and my personal
experience with the type of physical surveillance equipment used to ultimate-
ly resolve that problem, I have put together a suggestion for a fairly inex-
pensive system of physical surveillance which would provide security for the
Licensing Division specifically, and which would also significantly increase
the security of the entire City Hall complex during non - business hours.
The system which would provide the greatest security for the Licensing Depart-
ment would seem to be similar to that wlii.ch we used during; the recent investi-
gation. It would consist of a low light black and white video camera position-
ed to give an image of all high theft areas within the Licensing office. That
camera would be coupled with a video motion detector which would be located in
the Richfield Police Comminications Center which would sound an alarm when any
motion Is detected within the video picture at time, when that particular func-
tion of the system is armed. `iliis video monitoring capability with the motion
detecting device would provide for nighttime intrusion detection as well as the
selective response of Public Safety personnel. to any intrusion alarm in that
personnel would be able to view the activity which put the system into the alarm
mode. 11ii_s video image would be directed by coaxial cable to the Richfield Com-
munications Center where it would be recorded by a time .lapse video recorder
with a time and date generator capability which would preserve any evidence of
intrusion in a manner which would be extremely useful for future prosecution.
Additionally, the system would be equipped to monitor and record during daytime
hours when installations such as our Licensing, office are targets of dayti.rne
robberies, and tare system would be equipped witli a variety of tripping devices
which would activate an alarm in the Public Safety Commcuricati.ons Center and
would insure the recording of any daytime robbery attempts by the video record -
hig equipment. those particular tripping devices cnuld include remote pocket
transmitters, b i llcl ips and other dev ices t.yp i cal ly used for such purposes .
Again due to the recording capability of' the System, any evidentiary material
would be recorded, and also the Priblic Safety personnel would be able to make a
selective response again determined on what they are viewing on the video moni-
tors in the COIMT1r]n i Cl t i OTIS Center.
The final component of the system world be the installation of a second video
camera at the lower level. rear door (fl. the City {lull complex. It has been
wide practice to supply various deprirtment heads and other City employees with
keys which allow them to gain access to the complex after hours. I t is recog-
nized that this is a necessity, and no clot ih t w i 1 1 cant i nue into the future.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Inter — Offir;e Mernc�rarrfijn:
OATF
TO
FROM
su e J F c T SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM FOR CITY I U1L1.
Page 2.
What it suggested is that all doors be re -keyed throughout the complex and
that the rear lower door of the City hall complex be keyed uniquely and that
only that key be provided to City employees who Find it necessary to enter
the complex after business hours. The video camera located at that doorway,
coupled with the video recorder, would log all entries made through that door
and thus would provide some record both of the individual, the day and the
time that entry was made. The video output from the camera at the rear door
would also be fed through the video motion detector in the Public Safety of-
fice and would thus generate an alarm when an indi`vi.dtral approached that
door. The alarm signal could be used to initiate the recording of that par-
ticular camera or to alert Communications personnel that someone had approach-
ed the door, or it could also be used to allow the video image of that parti-
cular camera to be brotrght.i.rp on the monitoring screen within the Communica-
tions Center only at the times when motion at. the door is detected. This
would .free the Conrrmrnications personnel. from having to ut i 1 ize a monitor 100
percent of the time for the rear door and would allow them to monitor activi-
ty at the door-only when motion is heing detected. This feature of motion
detection would be similarly used for the video camera located in the licen-
sing Department after the hours of business when the Coirmnmicotions personnel
would not need to have the video image on a monitor unless motion is being
detected within the room.
This type of equipment has been priced out by me through the f inn of Video
Images .located in i d i na . It was clone hecatxse similar equipment to that which
has been proposed here would be Of g,Ml t use to the P(lb 1 is Safety Department
for surveillances which are semi - portable in nature such as theft from busi-
ness cases in whi.c:h we become involved, employee thefts in the areas within
City Hall such as the Licensing case was, as well ns thefts from the City
operated liquor stores. 'llre equipment would also be suitable for long term
surveillance activity from semi-fixed locations for• other types of crime such
as vice operations, fencing operations, etc. As a result, the purchase of
this type of equipment by City hall for this penimincnt insta.lat:ion provides
the opportun i.ty to demonstrate the vn 1 ue of soph i s t i cat eel surveillance equip-
ment to m.inimi.ze manpower expenses rain maximize the collection of readily
usable evidence -for prosecution.
Attached you will find a cost proposal prepnred by Video images for a. system
of video equipment similar to that which wo(i l d be needed for a permanent in-
stallation within the licensing I)ep,"llmont w; described above. The particular
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Inter-Office five Memnorandiim,
DATE
TO
FROM
SUBJECT SURVEILLANCE SYSTIN[ FOR CITY HALL
Page 3.
proposal that is attached was for a semi - permanent installation. However,
the specific equipment listed and the prices give a. fairly accurate indi-
cation of what the over -all cost would he. 'I1ie only equipment in addition
to that listed on the proposal which would be necessary would be one addition -
al video camera which is listed as Item #1 in the proposal., and additional
coaxial cable which is listed as .Item #6 in the proposal. As you can see,
the proposal presents a package price significantly below the list price for
the equipment, and I think it would be reasonable to asst.une that the over -all
price including one additional video camera would romain in the area of $5,000.
I have some literature on the various equipment described in the proposal and
would be happy to answer any questions you might have.
Respectfully submitted,
V. Lambert, Agent
VIU, : h .f
Atts.
^ ^r
sPROPOSAL
qq0o \t/l]ey vleiA - Tl�cu Yroirl^, �[ ��3/|/|
~....
`-.,/ ..~.,~.
Date: Fay 15, 1081.
ITEM
OUAN.
'MODEL
DESCRIPTION
UNITIPHICE
TOTAL
TO 1.02151NO2
RCA 211"
-1 t10.WVjC0yj �Tldjplcx, Camera
RU
With 1)"Ac
0o
This proposal as presented by Video Images Is firm until
Proposal c.) Submitted Bi--_
Total
WE HEREBY ACCEPT this proposal and agree to purchase the.items aqllsted above and on any continuation
pages attached hereto In accordance with the terms and provisions set forth on both sides hereof,
Company:
11 IIP
Authorized Agent:
LIM
9909 Valley View Road - Edon Pra-1-rie
(61.2)
r) el ILI '&A, Qf,--# A 1—f— W1 A.A
0 Qp VF
&09iriber V.N.A.
Date: May 15, 1981
Submitted To- Richfield
Public Safety_Department Delivery: 11 % Dtjy'
6700 Portland Ave. So. Terms: — Net 15
Richfield,
MT 554?11 F.O.B. Minneapolis
.0.
Attn: Vawlh)
n La mbert
ITEM
auAk
MODEL
DESCRIPTION
UNITPRICE
TOTAL
VIV-1054A
Panasonic N-ewvicon Camera (P)06y
rnl,y) witliotit Lens-, lntei,nal Linu,
Locked Random Trtei -Jace: .4v 6m-
7 335 00
470.00
KF-85A
Panasonic Wide Angle lens, P-.- fir
F /1: 5 with I\i)to Ti,.1
6A
Panasonic -1.6 Pal, r, /] .6 Standard ftttlo
Tris Lens
320.00
TC3252
RCA V' 'T'Ime Lapse 'j1doo Cassette
Recorder with 13ul,11-1 In rime Date
Generator, Alaini Time M(-!mor,)7 and On
Tape Alarm
5,
WV-7015
Wall Pracket., IJIpjIt. W11 L'Uty, -T,I-J('(-)Orl
25.00
6.
l
Tah60P/2
RCA Vid-lalert Motion Petocto•,
Channel
67` • CO
7.
1
VI Custom
Video lmapes 2 Charn-,(-1 ",witelier
V8660H
Vicon W/Vota-1ting
Rai-1^ VffC01-1-MP a nd 1.11ninper Proo f lock k
11011 .00
This proposal as presented by Video Images Is firm until June 1-17) - 1 Q R I
pr��E
Proposal
Total g765-00
Submitted
Bpad UaT,i,en
WE HEREBY ACCEPT this
proposal and agree to purchase the Items as listed above and on any continuation
pages attached hereto In accordance with the terms and provisions set forth on both sides hereof.
ompany-
9
P.
SHIP TO-
Authorized,Agent: X
. ...... .....
Title:
Dated
&09iriber V.N.A.
PROPOSAL CONTINUATION Date D^a ](W] Page of
ITEM
QUAN.
MODEL
DESCRIPTION
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
'JYans f ormer
cak�,I(:., aric] Connectors
1, 00. N
I'm.,,tallatior Not
c . 001
Gr.uid Total.
Rickrifro PrIc(,
r, '7 C�
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 218
Agenda June 22, 1981
Subject: Purchase of Richfield Lake Ponding Area
On February 23, 1981, the city council authorized
purchase by the HRA of a portion of the Richfield Lake lake
bottom from Harriet L. Adams. The HRA was negotiating the
purchase of both an upland area and the lowland, or lake
bottom, from Mrs. Adams as part of their developer's agree-
ment with the Lyndale Garden Center. Mrs. Adams would only
sell these two areas together. The lowland area is needed
by the city because it serves as a ponding area for storm
water runoff from public streets.
A negotiated sale was completed on May 29, when the
HRA took title to the Adams property. It would now be
appropriate for the city to purchase the lake bottom from
the HRA. This area of approximately 109,161 square feet is
valued at $0.25 per square foot or $27,290.00. Funds for
this purchase have been provided for in the capital improve-
ment program, parkland acquisition account.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the
attached resolution, authorizing purchase of the Richfield
Lake lake bottom from the HRA.
Respectfully submitted,
G �� �� i\1
ollenberge4
City Manager
cc: Community Development Director
Housing & Redevelopment Coordinator
Community Services Director
Administrative Services Director
Finance Coordinator
+ Y
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE OF RICHFIELD LAKE, LAKE BOTTOM
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield (the "City ") is responsible
for storm water runoff from public rights -of -way, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the city.to provide a system
of ponding areas to which the storm water can flow, and
WHEREAS, Richfield Lake has served as a.ponding area for
storm water runoff, and
WHEREAS, for the city to properly discharge this responsibility,
it is desirable to own the lake bottom area as described in
.Exhibit A, which is attached, and,
WHEREAS, the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(the "HRA ") has recently purchased a portion of the lake bottom
as described in Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, the area was appraised.by a competent appraiser
and the appraisal has been carefully considered, and
WHEREAS, funds for the purchase of park land space have
been allocated in the capital improvement program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD:
1. It is necessary to acquire the Richfield Lake lake bottom
described in Exhibit A.
2. Just Compensation is determined to be $27,290.
3. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute a
purchase agreement.
r
.4. The City Manager is directed to complete the purchase
process.
Passed by the Richfield City Council this 22nd day of June,
1981.
Dona d.J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
Exhibit A
Description of Richfield Lake,
Lake Bottom To Be Purchased
From HRA
That part of Government Lot 3, Section 28,
Township 28, Range 24, and that part of the
accretions to said Government Lot 3,
described as follows: Commencing at the
intersection of the east line of the north
and south alley in Block 2, "RAY'S LYNNHURST
2ND ADDITION ", and the south line of the east
and west alley in said Block 2; thence west
along the south line of said east and west
alley and its extension a distance of 202.00
feet to the actual point of beginning; thence
southwesterly to Judicial Landmark No. 7 set
pursuant to Torrens Case No. A -2547 on the
mean center line of the bed of Grass Lake;
thence southeasterly along said- mean center
line, determined in Torrens Case No. A -2547,
to a line bearing South 82 degrees West
(assuming the east line of said Government Lot
3 as bearing North) from a point on the east
line of said Government Lot 3 distant 1176.30
feet south from the northeast corner of said
Government Lot 3; thence North 82 degrees East
a distance of 775.10 feet to the shore or low
water line of Grass Lake as shown on the
survey dated December 23, 1976, and revised on
October 1, 1979, and referenced as applicant's
Exhibit 1 to Torrens Case No. 17101; thence
northwesterly along said shore or low water
line to a line bearing South 82 degrees West
from a point on the east line of said Govern-
ment Lot 3 distant 1131.30 feet south from the
northeast corner of said Government Lot 3;
thence northwesterly along said shore or low
water line to the actual point of beginning.
0�
63rd
• � 13 I+�J
z.
o
0 10 9 11 7I6'
ED
Q ' 1109
Richfield Lake bottom being
purchased by the city.
-0 e 3 0-
7
4 m
�D
V
s
5 0 N
a
a
6 17 1 4�/�
..�,
7 I?
a r
L7=�3�c�
�-- Z
J 1 9 8 17 6
0 Q
ii14 9,0 906 m
L AKA
0 7 4 a
6 5
a
S T.
W
_Q
7//- //
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 217
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Liquor Store Operation Goals and Objectives
There is an item on the June 22, 1981 city council agenda
providing for city council review and discussion of 1981 goals
and objectives for the city's liquor operations.
The analysis of the City of Richfield's liquor operation
which was completed earlier this spring by Beverage Marketing, Inc.,
described numerous operational standards in the liquor industry,
and analyzed our liquor stores' performance in those areas. The
BMI study described steps that the City of Richfield could take
to help its liquor operations more closely meet the accepted
industry standards. During the council's discussion of the BMI
report, council members requested that I consolidate the BMI anal-
ysis and recommendations into a summary statement of goals and
objectives for the city liquor operations.
Based on the BMI report and the council's discussion, I am
suggesting the following objectives for the city's liquor opera-
tions for the remainder of 1981:
1. Increase 1980 sales of $5,265,999 to $5,792,599, an
increase of 10 percent.
2. Increase 1980 operational profits of $362,453 to
$398,698, an increase of 10 percent.
3. Establish a profit margin of 6.9 percent.
4. Decrease the percentage of salaries and benefits
from 7 percent of sales in 1980 to 6 percent of
sales in 1981.
5. Increase inventory turnover from 5.68 times in
1980 to 7 times in 1981.
6. Increase sales substantially through reorientation of
the marketing effort towards a discount operation on `z
major product lines using media advertising to supple-
ment in -store and brochure promotional efforts.+
Coungil Letter No. 217 -2- June 22, 1981
7. Install new electronic cash registers to update
antiquated ones and provide inventory data on a
faster basis.
8. Initiate a regularly scheduled employee training
program on store policy and procedures, customer
relations, salesmanship and product knowledge.
These objectives represent a consolidation of BMI's suggestions,
tempered to fit our particular marketplace,.our current inventory
and staffing levels, and the fact that almost one -half of 1981
has already gone by. In order to achieve these objectives, a
major marketing effort will be necessary. I am suggesting that
council members discuss these objectives and some potential mar-
keting concerns at the June 22, 1981 city council meeting. Since
a new liquor operations director has recently been appointed, I
believe it is appropriate for council members to delineate the
policy guidelines that we wish to work within in seeking to achieve
these objectives during the rest of the year.
Res ectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN /eja
cc: Liquor Operations Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 216
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Report on Effects of 1981 Tax Bills
On City of Richfield
There is an item scheduled on the June 22, 1981 city
council agenda providing for council review and discussion of
the impact that the recently passed State Omnibus Tax Bill will
have on the City of Richfield during the rest of 1981 and 1982.
The Administrative Services Director will be present at this
meeting to describe some of the implications that that Legisla-
tion holds for the City of Richfield.
Preliminary calculations indicate that the city's 1982
property tax levy will be limited to a 3.1 percent increase over
our 1981 property tax levy. State aids for 1982 will be unchanged.
Since more than two- thirds of the revenue supporting the city's
general fund are derived from property taxes and state aids, the
3.1 percent increase in state aids represents a fairly accurate
figure for the overall increase and expenditures which the city
is likely to be able to support in the coming year.
Because of the severe fiscal - restraints that the city will
experience as a result of the limitations on property tax and
state aids, I believe it is important that the city council begin
considering matters related to the 1982 budget even earlier than
in previous years. For this reason, I will ask that the city
council schedule. a special council meeting for Wednesday, July
15, 1981, to begin review and analysis of the revised 1981 and
proposed 1982 city budget. It would be appropriate for the city
council to take action at the June 22, 1981 meeting establishing
a special meeting for July 15, 1981 as described.
Res ectfully submitted,
K�l V D (�
Karl Nollenberger
40 City Manager
KN /eja
cc: Department Directors
Finance Coordinator
1. LEVY LIMITS - SUMMARY
- 8% Limitation, For taxes payable in 1982, all cities will be
limited to an 8% increase over the actual amount levied in
1981, excluding special levies with the following exceptions.
- Homestead Growth. A growth factor based on the number of
increased homesteads from 1980 to 1981 will be included in
the 1982 limitation. (The 1980 census populations were less
than 1980 estimated population in 95% of the cities, therefore,
this provision will be of greater benefit than the previous
law to most cities.)
- Matching Grant. Special Levy for matching grants is repealed
except where funds have been appropriated by the State or
Federal government prior to September 1, 1981, to be used
in 1982 or a program is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue.
- Public Service Enterprise and Shade Tree Special Levy. These
special levies are repealed. Any amount levied payable 1981
will be included in the newly created 1982 levy base and be
subject to the 8% increase.
- Other Special Levies. All other special levies, including
Bonded Debt and Pensions, remain exempt from the 8% increase
limit.
Bonded Debt Option. A city at its option may include bonded
debt in the 80 limitation. (This is beneficial to any city
where Bonded Debt Levy for 1982 is expected to decrease in
actual levy dollars or increase at a rate less than 8 %.) The
Commissioner of Revenue must be notified by October 1, 1981
of intent to use this option.
- Cities Under 2500 Population and Bonded Debt. For these cities,
the portion of the 1981 levy subject to the 8% increase limit
will be calculated after excluding bonded debt unless the
Bonded Debt Option is chosen.
- Referendum. Reverse referendum is repealed. The original
straight referendum procedure remains.
- 1983. Levy limitations per Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.50
through 275.59 are repealed. The intent of the Governor and
Legislature is to address levy limits in the 1982 session for
1983 and beyond.
2. MUNICIPAL STATE AID - SUMMARY
- 1982 Aids will remain at the originally certified 1981 level.
This in effect means that all cities will receive approximately
8.3% more than actually received in 1981.
- 1983 Aids. The distribution pot is increased by $22.8 million
(8.4 %) for 1983 local government aids. (Caution: It is the
intent of the Legislature and especially the Governor's office
to study and change the distribution formula in 1982 for aids
payable in 1983 and thereafter. Thus, the increase could be
more or less totally per individual city depending on final
outcome of the 1982 session.)
-2-
- General. The payment schedule has been changed. The 750 of
payment remaining for 1981 will be made in six (6) equal
monthly installments commencing on July 15, 1981. Beginning
in 1982, the entire year's allotment will be paid in six (6)
equal installments starting on July 15.
3. SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM
- Funding. The Legislature provided $4 million for 1981 and
$2 million for 1982. This is considerably less than the amount
needed to fully fund the program which had been calculated to
be $10 million each year. The $4 million will provide grants
at approximately 20% of program cost for 1981.
- Program Unmandated. As of January 1, 1982, the program will
no longer be mandated in the metropolitan area. A city may
choose to discontinue its program. If a city chooses to
apply for grant money in 1982, it will have to follow the pro-
cedures and rules currently in place.
4. CO- EFFICIENT OF DISPERSION PENALTY
- Delayed. Implementation of the co- efficient of dispersion
penalty provisions has been delayed until 1983. The intent of
the Legislature is to study this issue in the interim and
either develop reasonable legislation for the 1982 session or
repeal.
5. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STUDY
The AMM sponsored bill (S.F. 227 - Laws 1981, Chapter 250) for a
study commission to examine the Metropolitan Council and Commis-
sions was passed and signed by the Governor. The main feature
of this act provides for a legislative commission consisting of
5 representatives and 5 senators to be established. The object I
of the commission will be to develop and recommend to the
legislature a comprehensive policy on governance in the metro -
1
politan area. The commission shall submit its report and recom-
mendations to the legislature by January 5, 1983. The issues and
policies to be considered by this commission during its examina-
tion include the following:
a) The relationships among the Metropolitan Council and the
various metropolitan special purpose agencies and between
these metropolitan institutions and other units and
agencies of government;
I
b) the structure and powers of the Metropolitan Council and
Commissions;
c) the appropriate uses of the authority of the Metropolitan
Council and metropolitan agencies to review local appli-
cations for state and federal financial assistance;
d) the feasibility of legislative approval of the budget and
staff complement of the Metropolitan Council.
-3-
The Legislative Commission expires on January 6, 1983.
0 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCEDURE
7'a
H.F. 969 (Laws 1981, Chapter 242), which the AMM co- sponsored
with the Metropolitan Council, authorizes the Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Procedure which was adopted by the Metropolitan
Council last winter. There was a legal question as to whether
the Metropolitan Council had the authority to adopt that pro-
cedure which shortened the processing time for comprehensive
plan amendments from 9 months to 90 days or less. This Act
removes that legal question.
6/15/81
cr
'
Standard measures of morbidity and mortality will be used to evaluate
personal health service outcomes in conjunction with demographic
analysis of the Richfield population. Service users are surveyed
periodically for satisfaction and input. The Advisory Board of
Health provides citizen input by continually evaluating services
and recommending expansions, additions or changes to the city
council so that the total community health needs will be -met. These
evaluations will he completed not only through statistical meth-
odology, but also through consumer interviews, community surveys
Iand
other public information tools.
t
r
It 40
E -3
f{FALTH SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTION '
ADMINISTRATION
Activity Title: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Improper planning and administration reduces community health effectiveness
and promotes public apathy.
B. STATEMENT OF NEED
Community participation and cooperation must be provided to support and pro-
vide effective organized health systems. Reliable statistical data and needs
assessment surveys must be part of a planning process. Keep records and submit
reports as required. ,
C. GOAL
Evaluate health needs and recommend and provide attainable guidelines. Pro- i
vide adequate reporting and recordkeeping.
D. OBJECTIVE
btaintain and promote available mechanisms to increase health awareness and
accountability.
E. METHODS
1. Use input from the advisary board of health members, other groups,
and residents of the city.
2. Participate in state health seminars and meetings.
3. Maintain an acceptable reporting system.
F. EVALUATION
Compare statistical evidence and reports.
I
M�
E -4
HFIALTH SERVICES ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIO;d
ENVIROIi1MENT.4L HEALTH
Activity Title: FOOD PROTECTION
A. PROBLEM STATE:• NT
1 Diminished health can result from food -borne illness, caused by the consumntion
of food contaminated with chemical substances or micro- organisms.
' Contamination of foods may occur from unsanitary conditions or improper
handling during food manufacture, processing, delivery or service. In
addition to problems associated with contamination, food spoilage and loss
of nutrients may result from improper storage or excessive shelf life. Some
common underlying causes of food - borne disease outbreaks are poor personal
hygiene, failure to hold readily perishable foods at legal refrigerated
' temperature, failure to hold hot foods at legal holding temperatures, and
inadequate cooking.
1
There are presently 60 restaurants and 20 other food facilities providing
direct food service in Richfield. The U.S. Public Health Service has estimated
that the utilization of food service establishments includes about 250 persons
per establishment per day. Assuming this figure is applicable, it is estimated
that 15,000 persons are served daily by these Richfield food establishments.
Richfield also has a substantial number of food vending machines.
When proper food - handling procedures are followed., most food -borne illnesses
can be prevented. Food protection programs are intended to prevent illnesses
attributed to consumption of foods. This program includes ins -Dection of all
food establisr^:ents, collection and analysis of selected food and environ-
mental samples, and education of food service personnel in the safe and proper
food handling techniques.
B. GOAL
To achieve, through education and enforcement, compliance with the various
laws, ordinances and policies which will insure all citizens of Richfield a
healthful and aesthetically pleasing food consumption experience.
C. OBJECTIVES
1. By systematic inonection and education to insure that all food, while bein;;
transported, stored, prepared, displayed, served or sold to the tiublic is
protected from.all forms of contamiration or adulteration. Consistent wit::
the Richfield Food Code, to inouxo safe consumption and minimize the Possibility
of food -borne disease enisodes.
E -5
FOOD SERVICE INSPECTION (cunt.)
-.C. OBJECTIVES (cont.)
To insure, through the plan review process, that each building
or part thereof that is intended for food production or storage,
is constnicted to comply with the provisions of the Richfield
Food Code, to insure that the structure and equipment is de-
signed to provide a durable, easily cleanable and aesthetically
appealing environment in which to store, prepare, display or
serve food to the consuming public.
D. METHODS
1. A Public Health Environmentalist is assigned designated food
facilities in which will be conducted a minimum of two (2)
comprehensive sanitary surveys each year. Necessary follow -
up surveys will be predetermined based on a mutually agreed
timetable of compliance, between the business and the city.
2. Periodic seminars will be held for food establishments, where
professional Public Health Environmentalists will train food
service n_ersonnel in safe food handling fundamentals. These
seminars will occur when certain facilities are exneriencinQ
problems conforming to code requirements, when requested by the
food service establishment, and at several scheduled times each
year.
3. All new or remodeled food establishments will require that de-
tailed plans and specifications be submitted and approved prior
to issuance of a building permit. A professional Public Health
Environmentalist will systematically review the plans, detail -
in; all areas of the structure or equipment not in conformance
with the Richfield Food Code. Follow -un field inspections will
be conducted as required to determine that construction is
proceeding according to the approved plans.
4. These services will be supplied by Capsule Laboratories of St. Paul
and the Richfield Fnvironmental Health Manaaer.
E. EVALUATION
Tlie performance of the inspection process will he evaluated by
certified inspectors from the State Department of health. The
certified inspectors will evaluate the interpretation and appli-
cation of the foot] cede during periodic field visits. This
evaluation will also he carried through the administrative aspects
of the insnection and enforcement process.
The evaluation
of the plan
review nrocess
will primarily he
iudred ')v field
evaluation
and review of
all correspondence used
in the Process
to determine
uniformitv of
effort.
E -6
I E -7
IIEAL711 SERVICES ACTIVITY DTSCRIPTION
ENVIRONIMENTAL HEALTH
Activitv Title: iiOUSiNG �-tATNTEN ?ANCE
A.
PP.OBLEM STATEMENT
Diminished health can result from conditions of illnesses associated
'
with substandard housing.
Although the total impact of substandard housing on health cannot be
fully determined, certain parameters of unsound housing have a definite
relationship to an individual's health status. ` !any researchers believe
that the irritations, frustrations, and invasions of privacy that occur
in soire residential environments are leading or contrihutin; factors of
mental illness. Respiratory infections, such as colds, bronchitis and
influenza are related to inadequate heating or ventilating and inadequate
and crowded sleening arrangements. Digestive -tract diseases are usually
related to cro,.,ding, inadequate water and sewage facilities, multiple
sleeping arrangements, and food handling facilities. Other potential
problems include carbon monoxide poisoning due to faulty home heating devices,
'
rodent and insect infestation, accidents due to crowding, poor electrical
connections, lighting and structural
poor problems.
B.
GOAL
To minimize the public health problems associated with substandard
multiple housing.
C.
OBJECTIVE
By inspection and education, to insure that housing code violations are
documented and corrected.
D.
METHODS
By citizen complaint or investigation, adjunct police and fire personnel
from the city will inspect dwellings and dwelling units for violations
of the housin;, code. All violations are recorded and orders for repairs
are issued. Necessary follow -up inspections are performed to determine
compliance. T!lese services are directed by the Richfield Environmental
Health Manager.
E.
EVALUATION
The housing, inspcction proi�ram is evaluated on the basis of hole well
each hntisin!, unit complies with code requirements. inspections are
recorded and violations are noted for correction. Follow-up information
is recorded to ins n
insure compliace th each violation. T11ose housing;
units that require repairs are liven more emnhasis by means of increased
insnectinns.
I E -7
HEALTH SERVICES ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
ENVIRWIENTAL HEALTH
Activitv Title: CMMUNiTY SAINNITATION
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Exposure to environmental contaminants, hazards or conditions in the
physical environment of the community, can result in diminished health.
Community sanitation covers a variety of environmental problems which
provide a link in the transmission of diseases to man. Included are
problems related to rodents, insects, weed control, improper refuse
storage, and a variety of public health nuisances. Manv sanitation
problems are inter - related so that a practical annroach to control
involves looking at total community sanitation rather than each component
separately. In addition to being public health nuisances, community sani-
tation -problems are often eyesores which lessen the aesthetic anneal of
the City and contribute to decline in property value.
B. GOALS
Either by citizen complaint or observation in the community, to identify
and abate all nuisance conditions consistent with state laws and local
ordinances.
C. OBJECTIVE
To respond to each complaint promptly and, if the complaint is valid,
write ordersfor its abatement. By observation determine conditions within
the city requiring attention and writing orders for correction.
D. METHODS
Complaints received from the public are recorded. Public Safety personnel
determine at the time of the initial visit if the complaint is valid. If
the comnlaint does constitute a violation of state or local ordinance, an
order is written specifying a timetable of compliance. A follow -up in-
spection is made on the compliance date to verify compliance, grant an
extension, if aarrantcd, or issue a violation tag when appropriate.
These services arc directed through the Richfield environmental Health
office.
E. EVALUATION
The evaluation of this activity is mainly achieved l)y a follow -un inspection
to observe the der;ree of conformance to ,,00d con,mun i ty sanitation practices.
2
I E -9
HEALTH SERVICES DESCRIPTION
ACTIVITY
ENVIRMM —NTAL HEALTH
Activity Title: F.NVIRON'.iENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL
A.
PROBLEM STATE`IENT
Exposure to polluted air, water or noise can result in diminished health.
'
Air pollution is reported to be a major factor in respiratory ailments,
such as lung cancer, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and the common cold.
Data indicates it may be a factor in heart disease and abnormal human
behavior. It also causes eye irritation.
Noise pollution can affect human health. The effects fall into two
overlapping categories, consciously perceived and insidious effects.
Consciously perceived effects are those recognized by the recipient
or person. -They usually have a subjectively irritating or a nuisance
character, but they are nevertheless important functionally, producing
such effects as interference with thought processes, communication dis-
ruption, performance impairment, sleep disturbance, and general mental
'
stress. Excessive noise can also result in permanent hearing loss.
Water has many uses; the potential threat of contaminated drinking
water and polluted recreational waters is increasing. Such facilities
include semi - public or private water supplies, private wells, swimming
pools, on -site sewage disposal units, stormwater discharge and cross -
connections.
B.
GOAL
To minimize the health effects attributable to air, private- source
water, and noise pollution.
C.
OBJECTIVE
To locate, identify and measure environmental pollutants and inform
industry and the general public of technical methods for abatement.
D.
METHODS
City Public Safety personnel, either by comnlaint or observation,
identify and measure environmental pollutants. Swimmin(I pools will
continue to he inspected routinely. These services are directed through
the Richfield Environmental Health office.
Noise sources will he investigated and m.casured to insure code con -
for! ^ance, and the air will he monitored and evaltiated for code
C017n1i aitCC.
I E -9
- . ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CONTROL (cont.)
E. EVALUATION
The environmental Pollution activity will be evaluated mainly on
the basis of output and compliance will applicable codes.
E -10
n
1
1
r .
HEALTIi SERVICES PROGRA4 DESCRIPTION
E.TrIRONTIMNTAL HEALTH
The water available for consumption will he routinely treated and
tested for coliforms, chlorination, fluoridation. and stability as
prescribed by state and public health standards. Water plant
inspections are conducted by the state health department.
r
U
11
I E -11
Activity Title: hATF.R TRF.AT`'FNT AND LABORATORY SUPPORT SERVICES
A.
PROBLE11 STATF."1F.NT
rAn
unsafe and untreated water supply causes diminished health and
illness.
A safe and sanitary water supply is vitally necessary for the well-
being of those who concume it.
Harmful chemicals, elements and disease organisms must he monitored
and nronerly treated to make the water safe for use. Typhoid,
hepatitis, cholera, salmonellosi.s, etc. are a few of the many di-
seases which are transported by a reservoir such as water to a
susceptible human host.
'
B.
COAL
To provide a safe and sanitary water supply saving the Richfield area.
C.
OBJECTIVE:
The city will analyze and chemically treat the public water supply to
make it potable.
D.
METIIODS
The city pumps water from seven deep wells to a central reservoir
and treats it to meet the "Public Health Service Drinking Water
Standards ". The water is softened, filtered, chlorinated, fluor-
!
idated, stabilized and further tested. The city laboratory support
services test and analvze the supply. These services are provided
by the water division of the Richfield Community Services Department.
E.
EVALUATION
The water available for consumption will he routinely treated and
tested for coliforms, chlorination, fluoridation. and stability as
prescribed by state and public health standards. Water plant
inspections are conducted by the state health department.
r
U
11
I E -11
u
HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAPd DESCRIPTION
ENVIRON`•?ENTAL HF.ALTfI r
Activity Title: ANIMAL CONTROL
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Animal control is necessary to keen problems associated with animals, ,
especially dogs and cats, to a minimum. Animals not properly regu-
lated cause annoyance through barking, over - turning refuse containers
and fighting with and killing other desirable animals. They may
spread disease and can be a threat to the safety of anyone, especial-
ly children. They may cause odors and depreciate property. Animal
control is a specialized component of a community sanitation activity.
B. GOAL
To effectively control those animals which adversely affect community
sanitation and safety.
C. OBJECTIVE
To license and enforce ordinances controlling animals, and to advise ,
city residents of their responsibilities for animal control.
D. METHODS
Community Service Officers will impound dogs and cats running at
large or creating public nuisances. They will determine if animals
are properly licensed and will issue a warning or citation and fine,
or impound animals to advise owners of code violations.: Kennels will
be inspected to assure compliance with sanitation requirements. Records
of animal bites will he maintained for rabies evaluation.
E. EVALUATION ,
Animal control is an ongoing program. Its effectiveness will be
assessed to insure the community freedom from rabies, undue noise,
and unsafe and unsanitary conditions. Records of animal impound-
ments, repeat offenders, citations and fines, and bites will be
analyzed through the evaluation process.
E -12
HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
E'1ERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Activitv Title: FIIEWIF.NCY RF.SCJJE SOUAD
A. PROBLEM STATE'TNT
Failure to provide timely intervention for emergency medical needs results
in unnecessary morbidity and mortality.
B. STATE'JENT OF :TEED
Individuals who experience emergency medical trauma require immediate
intervention by individuals competent in emergency medical intervention
services.
C. GOAL
' To decrease the incidence of morbidity and mortality resulting from
medical emergencies. To provide intermediary emergency medical services
and emergency medical training to community residents through an emer-
gency service.
D. OBJECTIVES
I E -13
Keep response time for medical emergencies under 5 minutes. Keep
1
emergency calls properlv:.synchronized with firemen, Police, and the
ambulance service.
F. METHODS
1. First response medical coverage for emergencies by on -duty policeman
'
in a squad car and a team of firemen in an emergency releif vehicle,
2. Ambulance service provided by Smith Ambulance Service Company.
3. First aid coverages for selected city events.
4. Training in first aid and cardio- pulmonary resuscitation.
F. EVALUATIO`;
'
Effectiveness of response time and provision of service for reduction of
morbidity and mortality statistics.
I E -13
HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAIM DESCRIPTION
COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICES
Activitv Title: HEALTH PROMOTION & COUNSELING
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Diminished ability to cope with stress and interpersonal relationships can
occur because of emotional problems, chemical dependencies or emotional
illness.
B. STATEMENT OF NEED
The need for counseling in areas of childbirth, chemical dependency, mental
illness has been demonstrated. The South Hennepin Human Services Needs
Assessment survey has helped to reinforce and support thinking and efforts
to provide direction for that purpose.
C. GOAL
To promote and encourage development of optimum emotional health.
D. OBJECTIVE
To provide counseling, support, evaluation and referral for mental illness,
emotional problems and chemical dependencies to individuals and families.
E. METIiODS I
?Iental health counselor and psychicatric consultant are available. Individual, t
group, couple, and family counseling is also provided for various needs.
Support services are provided through professional public health personnel.
Services are provided through Contract for Services Agreement with the
City of Bloomington.
F. EVALUATION
The output of the health promotion and counseling component of the community
nursing activity will he measured by a projected service index prepared by
the City of Bloomington. Statistical records will he required and used for
comparison with records of previous years to evaluate the need for and
participation in this program.
E -14
HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
HOME HEALTH SERVICES
Activity Title: HOME NURSING
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
' This activity is to address an inability to manage personal health concerns of
activities of daily living, arising from health problems.
1 E -15
B.
STATE '±F.NT OF NEED
?Minimizing length of hospital stay increases the need for home health care.
'
Encouragement of elderly to remain in their homes rather than go to a nursing
home reduces taxes but conversely requires home health support services. Re-
ferrals for other reasons necessitate optimal home health care by public
health nurses.
C.
GOAL
To enable individuals to live a more satisfying and healthful life in their
home environment when appropriate.
D.
OBJECTIVE
To provide professional home health services to individuals and families.
E.
METHODS
Home visits are provided by professional nurses at all levels of preparedness,
and home health aides. Referrals into this activity are encouraged through
continual outreach with appropriate resources. Visits will be provided for
both illness and health promotion. When indicated, the services of physical
therapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy or medical social services will
be arranged. Adults no longer homehound are encouraged to utilize the public
health facility or community center for appropriate therapy or monitoring of
health needs. All requirements for Title XVIII and SIS home Health providers
will he maintained. These services are provided through Contract for Services
Agreement with the City of Bloomington.
F.
EVALUATION
Output will he measured according to services indices projected by the City of
Bloomington. Physical records will he required for use in comparison with
1
records of nrevious vears to evaluate the need for participation in this program.
Communitv democ!ranhic considerations will also he evaluated in terms of antici-
pated public health needs and actual community utilization of home nursing
services.
1 E -15
DISEASE PREVENTION AND CONTROL.
PREVENTION AND CONTROL SERVICES
A. PROBLE`! STATEMENT
Failure to identify and control communicable and chronic disease endangers
the well being of both individuals and the community as a whole.
B. STATEMENT OF NEEDS
Effective treatment and control of both communicable and chronic disease
is dependent upon high levels of immunity, early detection and intervention
programs provided at the community level.
These services are usually not available on a low cost, accessible basis
through the private health sector. Therefore, many individuals fail to
seek prevention and control services. The need exists for an accessible
community health center which can respond to existing needs.
Periodic screening is critical for the early diagnosis and treatment of
cancer, (i.e. breast, cervical, oral). Screening is frequently ignored by
residents because of a lack of awareness, cost or accessibility of care.
The public health section is in a position to address those barriers.
The population of senior citizens is quite significant. This population
presents specific health needs. The Richfield community center is
effectively used to identify and promote health awareness for this
segment of the public.
C. GOAL
To promote and facilitate effective detection, treatment, and control
measures for chronic disease and adequate levels of protection against
communicable diseases.
D. OBJECTIVES
To provide accessible public health services which allow individual
participation in early detection and prevention programs.
E -16
' F. EVALUATION
Outaut: Measured according to service indexes.
Outcome: Nu.abers, results and follow -up will be acquired for:
1. Immunizations
t
2. Tuberculin tests and positive reactions
3. Epidemiology results of enteric infection
4. Chronic disease screening referrals and follow -up
5. Morbidity and mortality endices frequency, type and outcome of
problems identified.
E -17
E . 6LFT::ODS
1.
Immunization clinics
2.
Tuberculin testin, clinics
3.
Follow -up on enteric infections
4.
Adult screening, (i.e. hypertension, oral cancer, glaucoma, diabetes)
'
5.
Venereal disease screening and treatment
6.
Hypertension education and counseling
7.
Well adult screening clinics
'
8.
Theraueutic services
9.
Physical fitness progrn= for seniors.
' F. EVALUATION
Outaut: Measured according to service indexes.
Outcome: Nu.abers, results and follow -up will be acquired for:
1. Immunizations
t
2. Tuberculin tests and positive reactions
3. Epidemiology results of enteric infection
4. Chronic disease screening referrals and follow -up
5. Morbidity and mortality endices frequency, type and outcome of
problems identified.
E -17
HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
HEALTH EDUCATION
Activity Title: STAFF AND PUBLIC EDUCATION AND INFORMATION
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Inadequate health knowledge, attitudes and behaviors contribute to a
diminished level of well being.
B. STATEMENT OF NEED
Although the majority of public health services include education
to individuals, specific concerns warrant organized group education
to promote change. Specific health problems of the various age greups
are identified in the statistical section. The need exists to respond
to these concerns in a manner that includes involved community groups and
promotes linkages with other health services.
C. COAL
To encourage positive health practice through individual and group
health education.
D. OBJECTIVES
To extend health education opportunities to citizens through direct
service and assisting organizations in program development.
E. METHODS
A Public health Nurse - Educator will be assigned to develop and im-
plement health education programs. Health professionals will be
utilized as speakers within their speciality, to reach local schools,
churches and community organizations. Literature, films, and other
media such as video cassettes, will also be used.
These services will be provided through Contract for Services Agree-
ment with the City of Bloomington.
F. EVALUATION
Output of the public information and education activity will be
measured by the services ' index provided by the City of Bloomington.
E -18
t
HEALTH SERVICES ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
PARENT AND CHILD HEALTH
A. PROBLE %1 STATE`iENT
This activity will address the problem of failure to seek, find or use
appropriate preventive adult health services, and corresponding problem
of diminished infant, child, and adolescent health.
R. STATFkTFNT OF NEED
The private medical center cannot provide that level of service
needed to assure complete health protection for various segments of
the population. It is extremely costly to human life and the com-
munity not to provide counseling for institutional needs, pre-
adolescents, family planning, veneral disease, pregnancy, and
parenting. Screening is part of the program. health assessments
and guidance will be directed in private, in clinics, daycare,
nursery and private schools.
C. GOAL
To provide health supervision of well infants and children, and women.
D. OBJECTIVE
To offer children's and adult health clinics that will provide services
in health promotion, early detection and referral for treatment.
'
E. METHODS
Family planning clinics including; contraceptives and pregnancy diagnosis,
will he held. Veneral disease detection and treatment clinics, and adult
'
gynecological clinics and screening will also he provided. WIC program
functions are included in this activity.
Well Child Clinics for children(birth -6 months) will include physician
physical assessment, health history, developmental assessment, dental
observation, immunizations and family health counseling. Early and
periodic screening will he given to children F months -21 years. Services
will include infant and child immunization and tuberculin screening.
Services will he provided through Contract for Services Agreement with
the City of Bloomington.
F. EVALUATION
Evaluation of the Maternal and Children's health services will he based
on previous experience for this program.
'
E -19
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Minnesota Department of Health
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan
BUDGET DET��L JY PROGRAM
For the period
Name OT Agency:
Control No.
Date. 6 1 1 S 1 81
To
12/31/82 Mo. o'r Yr.
® Original
❑ Revised
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
Community Health Administration Services and Planning
11. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY COST:
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS AMOUNT
Administration and Planning
Environmental Health Manager (2/5 -time) 13,390
Steno Clerk (1/8 -time) 2,137
Other 3,200
TOTAL 18,727
III. PROGRAM 9UDGE7 9Y SOURCE OF FUNDS;
CHS
Loci Perticiaation
Other"
Other**
Total
Subsidy
State
Federal
Budget
Tax Law Fees Other'
0
18,727
__
__
__
__
18,727
'Specify Type (e.g. Irv-Kind. Gifts. Revenue Sharing)
..S
pecify Source of rungs.
'
E-20 HE-0106-141
IV. pgCGAAM 9000cT 0ETA1L 3Y CCST:
C:`ST C,aT =GC R 15S
Environmental Health Manager
Steno Clerk
Public Safety Director
City Manager
Health Officer
Legal
Finances and Accounting
Supplies
Professional Meeting
E -21
AMQUNT
13,390
2,137
400
400
679
300
300
401
720
1
TCTAL 18.727 1
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Minnesota Department of Health Control No.
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan Date 6 1 15 181
BUDGET DETAIL BY PROGRAM Mo. Day yr.
For the period 1/1/ 82 To 121314 -2
El Original
Name or Agency: ❑ Revised
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
Environmental health
PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS AMOUNT
Food Protection .2 5,744
Community Sanitation .4 11,487
Housing Maintenance .4 11,487
Environmental Pollution Control .1 2,872
Water Treatment and Support Services .3 31,384
Animal Control 2.5 33,705
TOTAL 96.679
III. PROGRAM BUDGET BY SOURCE OF FUNDS;
CHS
Local Participation
Other*
Otter"
Total
Subsidy
Tax Lary F-s Otter•
$tats
Federal
Budget
in -kind
22,075
27,204
39,000
8,400
--
--
96,679
'Specify Type (e.g. !n -Kind. Gifts, Revenue Sharing)
"Specify Source Of rands.
I HE-01063-01
E -22
IV, PgCGAAM 3UDGcT DETAIL 3Y CuST:
c KIST Ca,TcrCRIES
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Environmental Health Manager (3/5 -time)
Steno Clerk (3/8 -time)
Community Service Officers (2.5)
Chief Water Plant Operator
Contractural Services
Travel
Supplies
Other -- postage, telephone,abatement, in -kind
E -23
Total------------- - - - - --
TCTA L
AMO NT ,
20,088
6,411 '
17,120 '
8,592
8,988 '
9,000
11,080 '
15,400 '
96,679 '
96,679 ,
f
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Minnesota Department of Health Control No.
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan 6 /15 / 81
BUDGET DETAIL BY PROGRAM Date
MO. Orb Yr.
For the period 1/1182 To 121.31.182
fU Original
Name of Agency: ❑ Revised
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
1. PROGRAM TITLE:
Emergency Medical Services
II. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY COST:
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS AMOUNT
Emergency Medical Services 28,000
TOTAL 28,000
III. PROGRAM BUDGET SY SCURCc OF FUNDS:
'Specify Type (e.g. In- Kind. Gifts. Revenue Sharing)
'Specify Source of Tunas.
' HE -01063-01
E- 24
Local Nrticiostion
other**
other, •
Total
CHS
$tats
Federal
Budget
Subsidy
Tax Levy F9es Other•
0
28,000
--
--
28,000
'Specify Type (e.g. In- Kind. Gifts. Revenue Sharing)
'Specify Source of Tunas.
' HE -01063-01
E- 24
IV, PgCGAAM 3UOCcT OETAIL 3Y C^,ST: ,
c�^S' CAT =OC A I E�
AMCLJNT
h
Emergency Medical Service Calls 15,500
2 firemen - personnel used for each emergency call
1 policeman -
EMI Training
1 500 '
Fire rescue truck '
depreciation and operating expense 2,000
Space rental 91000 '
Total------------- - - - - -- 28,000
TOTAL 28 0n0
i
i
Minnesota Department of Health Control No.
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan 6 1 15 /81
BUDGET DETAIL BY PROGRAM Data
1983 (4 ?) MO. Der yr.
For the period 1Q�1 - To .
® Original
Name of Agency: ❑ Revised
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
Community Nursing Services
II. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL. BY ACTIVITY COST:
ACTI`lITTES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS
Health Promotion and Counseling
TOTAL
III. PROGRAM BUDGET 9Y SOURCE OF FIJNDS;
AMOUNT
A r A / �
'Specify Type ie.(;. In -Kind, Gifu, Revenue Sharing)
" Specify Source of Funas.
' r+E -01063-01
E -26
Local Nrticitsstion
Other**
Other"
Total
CHS
State
Federal
Budget
Subsidy
Tax Latry F�a CKher•
26,929
29,493
- --
- --
- --
- -- 46,427
'Specify Type ie.(;. In -Kind, Gifu, Revenue Sharing)
" Specify Source of Funas.
' r+E -01063-01
E -26
IV. aRCG�a�A 3UCGc CETa1L 3`! C'CS':
AM NT
'
CC, ST C-41 CRIES
Contractual Service provided by the City of Bloomington 46,427
7C AL 46,427
ir
I
E-27
Minnesota Department of Health
Control No.
'
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan
Date 6 / 15
/ 81
BUDGIT DETAIL By PROGRAM
Mo. o.v
`fir.
For the period 1982 To
® Original
Name of Agency:
❑ Revised
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
'
Home Nursing Service
II. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY COST
'
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS
AMOUNT
'
Home Nursing
18,206
r
'
TOTAL
III. PROGRAM BUDGET BY SOURCE OF FUND;
'
Local Particiostion other**
Other"
Total
CNS ��
Federal
Budget
'
Subsidy Tax Lary Fxa Other•
7,709 10,497 -- -- --
--
18,206
•SGecifv 7 ype le.q. In -Kind. Gifts. Revenue Sharing)
pecify Source of Funds.
'E-28
- 4e -01 0e301
IV. AgCGRAM SUCG T OETA1L 3Y =ST:
SST Cr1T =0C R I ES
Y
Contractual service provided by the City of Bloomington
E_29
AMC NT '
18,206
TOTAL 18,206 '
Minnesota Department of Health Control No.
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan Date 6 / U / 31
BUDGET DETAIL BY PROGRAM Mo. o.r Yr.
For the period 111/82 -To 1-21/1"81 -
77 Original
Name of Agency: ❑ Revised
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
Parent and Child Health
11. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY CO�Z
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS AMOUNT
Parent and Child Health 16,183
School support
TOTAL 16,183
III_ PROGRAM 9UDGET 3Y SCURCc OF EUN10
'Specify —ype (e.g. In -Kina. Gifts, Revenue Sharing)
"Specify Source of Tunas.
E -30
m E -01063-01
Local Participation
Tax Lswy Fees Other*
Other"
State
Other"
Federal
Total
Budget
CHS
Subsidy
2,185
--
--
--
--
16,183
13,998
'Specify —ype (e.g. In -Kina. Gifts, Revenue Sharing)
"Specify Source of Tunas.
E -30
m E -01063-01
IV. pgCGAAM 9000c DETAIL 3Y CCST:
CO—, ST ,,;,,r.CRIES AMO NT ,
ti
Contractual services provided by the City of Bloomington 16,183
16,183 '
• TCTA L
E -31 '
CHS
Local Particioation
other"
Other••
Minnesota Department of Health
Control No.
State
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan
Date 6 / 15 / 81
Tax Levy F� othM'
BUDGET DETAIL BY PROGRAM
MO. Day yr,
For the period 1/1/82 To
® Original
--
Name of Agency:
❑ Revised
--
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
'
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
Health Education
II. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY CC
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS
AMOUNT
Staff and Public Education and Information
8,092
TOTAL 8, 092
III. PROGRAM BUDGET BY SOURCI= OF FUND ;
CHS
Local Particioation
other"
Other••
Total
SubiidY
State
Federal
Budget
Tax Levy F� othM'
0
8,092
--
--
--
--
8,092
*Specify Type (e.g. In- Kind. Gifu. Revenue Sharing)
"Specify SOUfCe of rUnCS.
E -32 He -0�o�at
IV. pgCGAAM 9uCCc DETAIL 3Y CrST:
C--ST CA cGC R I ES
AMOQ NT
Contractual services provided by the City of Bloomington 8,092
TCTAL 8,092
E -33
U
L
Minnesota Department of Health
Community Health Services Subsidy Plan
BUDGET DETAIL BY IROGRAM
For the period 1/1182 To 1 �,191�°'
Name of Agency:
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Ave. S.
Richfield, MN 55423
I. PROGRAM TITLE:
Disease Prevention and Control
1
t
II. PROGRAM BUDGET DETAIL BY ACTIVITY COST
ACTIVITIES NO. OF FTE POSITIONS
Disease Prevention and Control
III. PROGRAM BUDGET SY SOURCE OF FUND;
Control No.
Date 6/ is I R 1
Mo. 08v Yr.
® Original
0 Revised
AMOUNT
12,147
TOTAL X2,14
CHS
Loci Particiostion
Qther••
Qther'•
Total
Subsidy
State
Federal
Budget
Tax Levy F-A" Others
6,322
5,825
--
--
--
--
12,147
'Scecify Type (e.g, In -Kina. Gifts. Revenue Sharing)
"Scecify Source of Tunas.
IE -34 .+e -010e3a1
IV. P9CGRAM 3000ET OETAIL 3Y CCST:
COST CAT= GCRIEs
Contractual Services provided by City of Bloomington
E -35
AMQtJN T 1
12,147
1
f
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
!
TCTAL 12,147 1
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Ar- /y/
Council Letter No. 214
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Purchase in excess $1,000
Chapter Six, Section 6.05 of the city charter
stipulates that the city council must approve the purchase
of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction when
the amount exceeds $1,000. There are three such items on
the city council agenda of June 22, 1981.
TIRES
It has become necessary to replace two tires 'on unit
#192, a caterpillar front -end loader. This unit was
purchased July 3, 1973. The original tires are still on the
unit. The tires that are needed are not supplied through
the Hennepin County joint purchase agreement. The original
tires were supplied by Ziegler and the city has had good
success with the tires. Ziegler has quoted a price of
$832.37 for each of the two tires. Construction Tire Company
of St. Paul quoted $884.23 per tire. If the castings of the
existing tires are determined to be sound, Ziegler would
provide a credit to the purchase of $90 per tire. The unit
is fully depreciated, but there are currently no plans to
replace this unit at this time as it still has much use
available.
Therefore, it is recommended that the city council
authorize the purchase of two tires at $832.37 each from
Ziegler for a total purchase price of $1,664:74. If the
e
existing tires are acceptable, there would b a credit which
would reduce this purchase price.
SIGNS
Approximately a year ago, a consulting firm surveyed all
traffic signs in the city of Richfield. This work was financed
through a grant secured for such purpose. There is also grant
money available for upgrading or replacement of signs which was
identified as a result of the survey. The grant would provide
reimbursement for a percentage of the cost involved in purchase
and installation of these signs.
Council Letter No. 214 -Z- June 22, 1981
It is recommended that the city council authorize the
purchase of 12 "Signal Ahead" signs, two "Lane Ends" signs,
two "Road Narrows" signs, 150 "No Parking Anytime Except
Sundays" signs, eight turn signs to the right and eight curve
signs to the left from Earl Anderson and Associates for a total
purchase price of $1,689.90. A quote from Gopher Sign Company
would provide the same signs at a cost of $2,790.20.
HI- RANGER REPAIR
The hi- ranger is a piece of equipment
fund that is used for a number of activities
operations. At the present time its major u
Dutch elm disease removal. Emergency repair
past week, and the importance of the unit in
program necessitated that the repair be made
action.
in the central garage
within the city
3e is in the area of
was required this
the diseased tree
prior to council
It is recommended that the city council approve the pay-
ment to Road Machinery and Supplies Company in the amount of
$1,443.18 for emergency repairs to the hi- ranger.
Res ectfully submitted,
/49 astn
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN /eja
cc: Finance Coordinator
Community Services Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 213
Agenda June 22, 1981
Subject: Petition for Sidewalk Construction
House of Prayer Lutheran Church, 7625 Chicago Avenue
South, has submitted a petition requesting that the sidewalk
on the east side of Chicago Avenue between 76th Street and
77th Street be extended to 77th Street. Currently the
sidewalk terminates 317 feet north of 77th Street. The House
of Prayer Lutheran Church is the only abutting property owner.
In the past, the cost for construction of sidewalks
has been assessed on residential local streets at 50% for a
non - residential property owner such as the church. The
estimated cost for construction of the 317 feet of five -foot
sidewalk requested by the House of Prayer Lutheran Church is
$4,755. If the council acts on this petition, it would be
feasible to do this construction as an addition to the 1981
sidewalk construction project.
The staff recommends that the council pass the attached
resolutions to accept the petition, order the preliminary
report, accept the preliminary report, and order a public
hearing on this project for July 13, 1981.
Res ctfully submitted,
D D mjell�n
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Community Development Director
City Engineer
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Date Received
TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
we, the undersigned, owners of not less than 51 percent in frontage of the real property
abutting on /
_ C—/nc(-gQn AfeA U& Between
And '7 L L_[711ic i n i 4, � 13PN hereby petition that such street be improved
By 1/1 P f5i le Wig I/ / A41, q ),� y/ j��
SIGNATURE OF OWNERS
HOUSE NO.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
1.
2. 0
3•
4.
5•
6.
7.
8.
9•
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15-
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
.xamined, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number
of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
Percent
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
Be it resolved by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota:
1. A petition requesting the construction of a
sidewalk on the east side of Chicago Avenue 317
feet north of 77th Street to meet existing side-
walk, filed with the council on June 22, 1981,
is hereby declared signed by the required percen-
tage of owners of property affected thereby. This
declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 429.035.
2. The petition is hereby referred to the city
engineer and he is instructed to report to the
council with all convenient speed advising the
council in a preliminary way as to whether the
proposed improvement is feasible and as to
whether it should best be made as proposed or
in connection with some other improvement, and
the estimated cost of the improvement as
recommended.
Adopted by the council this 22nd day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PRELIMINARY REPORT
AND CALLING HEARING ON
ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted this
22nd day of June, 1981, a report has been prepared by the city
engineer with reference to the construction of a sidewalk on
the east side of Chicago Avenue 317 feet north of 77th Street
to meet existing sidewalk and this report was received by the
council on June 22nd, 1981.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. The council will consider such improvement in
accordance with the report and assessment of
abutting property for 50% of the cost of the
improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $4,755.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 13th day of July, 1981 in
the council chambers at city hall at 7:00 p.m.
and the clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvement as required
by law.
Adopted by the council this 22nd day of June, 1981.
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
L'
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
STREET BARRICADE REQUEST
Date of Request e 15, /d?
Person Making Request 3cll ie L. y
Address a �3 d d-
Date Streets to be Barricaded -7-4- L
Streets to be Barricaded .2 AZ it(/ C. /}—r" S tl� 37' Slt
Time (o .' 0 U .P -111
1 ` - %
Approval of Surrounding Neighbors:
Name
Ila
(Signatures and Addresses Required)
Address
(v�o26 m so
:mac
.,�
Z/
ai
57 -
Yjl ae
Up completion of he form, please return to the City Manager's office,
6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield, MN 55423, at least 15 days prior to
the requested date of the barricade placement.
i
ova,
ct—t-C-11
Public Safety Department Approval
Community Services Department Approval
' |U0
v"..^. ~-
"
^
�
`
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
;tt 7
Council Letter No. 212
Agenda June 22, 1981
Subject: Comprehensive Plan for City of Richfield
In December, 1980, the city council authorized the
staff to release the draft comprehensive plan to adjacent
communities for their review in accordance with the Metropolitan
Land Planning Act. Copies of the comments received are attached
for your information. The staff does not feel that any sub-
stantial changes in our plan are necessitated by these comments.
We have made additions and corrections to the plan where other
information was provided, which indicated the need for such
additions and corrections.
The draft comprehensive plan was also submitted to
the Metropolitan Council for their informal review. The
Metropolitan Council staff requested some additional informa-
tion concerning sanitary sewer flows and Capital Improvement
Program financing, although they indicated that they saw no
major problems with the draft document.
The Planning Commission conducted the required public
hearing on the draft comprehensive plan on June 9, 1981. No
members of the public were present for the hearing. The
Planning Commission adopted the comprehensive plan and
recommended that the city council accept the draft plan and
submit it for formal review by the Metropolitan Council.
It is recommended that the city council pass the
attached resolution, accepting the draft comprehensive plan
and authorizing its submittal to the Metropolitan Council.
The deadline for submitting a draft comprehensive plan
to the Metropolitan Council is June 30, 1981. After the
Metropolitan Council receives our plan, they will have 120
days for review of the plan. After we receive their comments,
the city will have an additional nine months to formally
adopt the comprehensive plan.
Respectfully submitted,
arl Nollenberger
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PRE -VIEW REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local
governmental units prepare comprehensive plans and submit them
to the Metropolitan Council for review; and
WHEREAS, this plan entitled "The Comprehensive Plan of
Richfield, Minnesota" represents the response of Richfield to
the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, this plan was adopted by the Richfield Planning
Commission on June 9, 1981 following a public hearing with
required legal notice; and
WHEREAS, this plan was sent to Bloomington, Edina, Min-
neapolis, Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Airports Commission,
and the Richfield School Board for review and comment on December
30, 1980; and
WHEREAS, this plan was considered and accepted, but not
adopted, by the Richfield City Council on June 22, 1981; and
WHEREAS, this plan shall be transmitted to Bloomington,
Edina, Minneapolis, Hennepin County, the Metropolitan Airports
Commission, and the Richfield School Board concurrently with
submission to the Metropolitan Council for formal review under
the Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota that the City Manager is authorized
and directed to submit this plan to the Chairman of the Metro-
politan Council for review under Section 473.175 of the Metro-
politan Land Planning Act.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
22nd day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
t
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR °z
A -2300 Government Center (_ z
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
HENNEPIN
-J- H
April 16, 1981
Mr. Carl Nollenberger, City Manager
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
Re: Hennepin County Review Comments
Comprehensive Plans /Metropolitan Land
Planning Act
Dear Mr. Nollenberger:
Enclosed with this letter are Hennepin County's review comments relative
to your community's comprehensive plan pursuant to the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act of 1976.
Please address any questions concerning the comments to Robert Isaacson,
C -2353 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, 348 -4544.
..Sincerely,
— hie' A. Ackmann
County Administrator
cc: Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
HENNEPIN COUNTY REVIEW
COMPREHENSIVE PLANS /METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT
Submitting Agency
City of Richfield
Date Received 2/4/81
TYPE OF PLAN
X Governmental Unit Comprehensive Plan
School District Capital Improvement Program
GENERAL REVIEW COMMENTS .
Affects Does Not Affect
X
1. Hennepin
County
Transportation System Plan
X
2. Hennepin
County
Solid Waste Plan
NA
3. Hennepin
County
Human Resources Plan
X
4. Hennepin
County
Park Reserve District
Long Range Development Plan
(For affected areas see below or attached Specific Review Comments.)
Date review forwarded to submitting agency _
Date review fo r4arded to Metropolitan Council
4/14/81
4/14/81
2/9/81
Re: City of Richfield
Comprehensive Plan
Goals and Objectives
- Are local goals and objectives consistent with those of the Park Reserve
District for subject planning areas. Yes.
- Identify Major differences requiring resolution. None.
- Are goals and objectives sufficient to allow for review. Yes.
Plannning Inventory
- Is the supporting documentation consistent with Park Reserve District
data. Yes.
- Is sufficient data provided to support plan and policy recommendations. Yes.
Plan Element
- Does the plan represent or contain major impact(s) on Park Reserve District
plans or development programs. No.
- Identify the impact of local plan - major /minor. None.
- Identify major issues requiring resolution between Park Reserve District
plans and local plans. None.
Planninq Policy Recommendations
- Are the local planning policy recommendations consistent with Park Reserve
District policies on subject area plans. Yes.
- Identify policy differences requiring resolution. None.
JS /sk
r1-� - RECEwEn n
11.'Ji� ;�l'iIInK:�J ~ r L; Q 9 1Qq
�!1� „11rdyll�!IC��
DATE: 19 February, 1981
�pIN
TO: Larry Blackstad _ (( v 1 C , °L
HENNEPIN Office of Planning & Developments
FROM: Luther Nelson, Director>
Dept. of Environment & Energy NES�
lu SUBJECT: MLPA - Review of Comprehensive p an,
Richfield
The comprehansive plan for Richfield addresses all
the issues which concern our department. -The plan
presents no conflicts or duplication of effort
in plan content as viewed by the Department of
Environment and Energy.
LDN:MSB /mvr
RECEIVEDFE3 2
4 19,91
DATE: April 9, 1981
TO: Larry Blackstad, OPD �vlN C0G
2
J. M. Wold, Dept. of Tran ortati W�
FROM:
Planning and Programming G�ILiP
SUBJECT: City of Richfield Compreh nsive Plan
Transportation Element Review Comments
Richfield's transportation plan is compatible with Hennepin County's plan; and its
adoption presents no adverse impact to the County's road - system.
Specific comments regarding plan contents of the transportation element follow:
-The City should include CSAH 31 in their discussion of the existing road system
(Pages 2 & 3) and road .jurisdiction (Page 6).
-CSAH 31, at its intersection with I -494 in the southwest corner of Richfield,
should be shown on Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 25, & 26.
-The discussion on differences in functional classification (Page 9) refers to a
Table 2. Our copy of the plan did not have this table.
-With several exceptions, Richfield's proposed functional classification of County
roads is consistent with County and Met Council plans. The following table lists
these exceptions:
,We foresee no problem in reconciling the differences. The important point is the
plans agree in concept.
- Recommended corrections to Figure 6, "Funding Classification" map.
1) CSAH 52 (Nicollet Ave) - this road is not eligible for FAU funding. The road
is eligible for Municipal County State Aid (,MCSA).
2) CSAH 62 - eligible for FAU and County State Aid (CSA).
3) Joint section I -3561 /CSAH 62- eligible for Federal Aid Primary (FAP) ° Interstate (FAI).
4) CSAH 32, CSAH 35, and CSAH 53 - eligible for MCSA and FAU.
5) CSAH 31 - eligible for CSA and FAU.
- Recommended corrections to Figure 7, "Right- of4lay Width" map.
1) CSAH 31, between Crosstown and 66th St. right -of -way varies from 66 feet to
120 feet.
2) CSAH 31, north of I -494, right- of -ti,ray more than 100 feet.
- Recommended corrections to Figure 9, 'Street Width" map.
1) CSAH 31, between Crosstown and 66th Street, 52 feet - plus
2) CSAH 31, north of I -494, 46 feet
L
-We recommend adding to the list "of improvements needed to upgrade safety levels ",
(Page 37) the following:
Eliminate /consolidate curb cuts along minor arterial routes, especially near
major intersections.
RECEIVE 3
Classification
Road _
Richfield
Hennepin County
Metro Council
CSAH 31 (CSAH 53 to CSAH 62)
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
CSAH 31 (I -494 to 76th)
Not Identified
Minor Arterial
Collector
CSAH 52
Minor Arterial
Collector
Collector
,We foresee no problem in reconciling the differences. The important point is the
plans agree in concept.
- Recommended corrections to Figure 6, "Funding Classification" map.
1) CSAH 52 (Nicollet Ave) - this road is not eligible for FAU funding. The road
is eligible for Municipal County State Aid (,MCSA).
2) CSAH 62 - eligible for FAU and County State Aid (CSA).
3) Joint section I -3561 /CSAH 62- eligible for Federal Aid Primary (FAP) ° Interstate (FAI).
4) CSAH 32, CSAH 35, and CSAH 53 - eligible for MCSA and FAU.
5) CSAH 31 - eligible for CSA and FAU.
- Recommended corrections to Figure 7, "Right- of4lay Width" map.
1) CSAH 31, between Crosstown and 66th St. right -of -way varies from 66 feet to
120 feet.
2) CSAH 31, north of I -494, right- of -ti,ray more than 100 feet.
- Recommended corrections to Figure 9, 'Street Width" map.
1) CSAH 31, between Crosstown and 66th Street, 52 feet - plus
2) CSAH 31, north of I -494, 46 feet
L
-We recommend adding to the list "of improvements needed to upgrade safety levels ",
(Page 37) the following:
Eliminate /consolidate curb cuts along minor arterial routes, especially near
major intersections.
RECEIVE 3
Memorandum - 2
' Larry alac(stad
April 9, 1981
-On Page 44 the City states, "One of the problems with implementing the bike plan
has been the lack of approval for bikeway crossing signs on County roads ".
The County will consider requests for bikeway crossing signs when the crossing
is part of an adopted City bikeway system. All requests for bikeway signing
should be submitted to:
Traffic Division
Hennepin County Department of Transportation
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
- Recommended correction to Figures 25 and 26, "Traffic Projections"
1) Show 22,000 ADT on CSAH -31 north of I -494
-The following comments respond to the City's proposed 1982 -1986 Capital Improvement
Program:
1) Xerxes /66th Street Storm Sewer - Proposed for 1983 construction. Any County
participation will be based on the standard State Aid formula - Ratio of
Contributing Flows. For information contact:
Hydraulics Engineer
Hennepin County Department of Transportation
320 Washington Avenue South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
2) Penn /66th Street intersection proposed for 1983 - The County is submitting
this project for FAU funding. Project 8026 will be recommended as a Safety
Improvement Project in the County's 1983 program.
3) 66th Street - Penn to Xerxes - The City proposes construction in 1983. This
project is not included in the County's 1982 -1986 CIP.
4) Penn Avenue - 76th to I -494 - The City shows this project beyond 1986.
Hennepin County is participating in a task force studying this area.
5) Portland Avenue /66th Street - The City shows construction in 1984. Hennepin
County does not have this project programmed. However, we have prepared
concept plans and intend to submit them to the City for Council action.
- Airport Element (Pages 14 -16) - Hennepin County shares the City's concern
regarding access to the future west terminal site. The Airport Master Plan
did not adequately address the traffic impact on CSAH 62, CSAH 53, and TH 77.
JMW /DBM:pj
S!n ;n(, }P!Iln'He�J
I
Rio__, y�6�e tl�q�
A
EDI � 1�
1801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA P, ".!^iF1ES0T<.
612 -927 -8861 May 26, 1981
Mr. Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Karl:
We have reviewed Richfield's draft Comprehensive Plan dated December 29,
1980, in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. We would like
to commend you for the preparation of an excellent plan. The goals and
policies of the plan are clearly stated and appear to be based on extensive
study. We find no major inconsistencies with our goals and policies.
As you know, several boundary related problems have arisen over the years.
Traffic increases on Richfield streets due to Edina developments is a frequently
cited concern. Due to existing land use patterns, it will be difficult for us to
insist on low intensity development for vacant land in southeast Edina. Your
comments concerning the restriction of further retail zoning in southeast Edina
certainly are consistent with our plan. Also, your urging to incorporate acces-
sory retail uses in large office and residential developments is one of our primary
objectives. We believe that the provision of a suitable mixing of uses on remaininc
vacant lands will also reduce the need for intra -area and inter -area automobile trips.
Other transit and roadway goals advocated by our plan area also sympathetic to
your concerns.
The capacity of I -RF -491 sanitary sewer interceptor is a concern. Obviously,
the capacity of this interceptor cannot be exceeded. We are presently working
with Waste Control Commission staff on this concern. Frankly, we are not con-
vinced at this time that a capacity problem does in fact exist.
Lastly, you have noted the 66th Street and Xerxes
Our staffs have met on several occasions to discuss
poses the expenditure of $350,000 by Edina to solve
prepared at this time to commit to this expenditure.
Again, congratulations on a well written plan.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
KR:jr
Avenue storm sewer problem.
this issue. Your plan pro -
this problem. We are not
Bitthe c t:y of
Bloomington
I",,--SOtS
2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD - 55431 - (612)881 -5811
February 24, 1981
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager -
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
The City of Bloomington has received a copy of the proposed
comprehensive plan for Richfield. Following review of the
plan by the Planning Division staff and Planning Commission,
the City Council on February 23, 1981 authorized transmittal
of the following comments:
1) Figure 9 in the land use section shows four areas in Bloomington
as "potential land use conflict areas." When Bloomington's plan
was submitted to Richfield for review in 1980, Mr. Nollenberger's
review letter stated that "[Bloomington's plan] is compatible
with the City of Richfield's goals, policies and programs."
Richfield should either state its specific concerns about land
uses in Bloomington or remove references to land use conflicts
from figure 9 and the plan text.
2) In the airport and implementation elements, Richfield does not
address Metropolitan Airport Development Guide policy four
concerning land use compatibility around Minneapolis- St..Paul
International Airport. Richfield policy H specifically opposes
the preferential runway system. In the implementation section,
no comment is made to specific actions which promote land use
compatibility. Richfield should reconsider policy H and
evaluate its commitment to specific actions a fully developed
community may take to achieve land use compatibility, for
example, application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
for variances from the land use standards and development of
ground noise attenuation programs.
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
,,
Karl Nollenberger
February 24, 1981
Page Two
3) Richfield has indicated its intent to apply to the Metropolitan
Council for changes in the functional classification of
several streets:
-- Bloomington will support reclassification of 12th Avenue as
a collector;
-- Bloomington questions the utility of classifying Nicollet
Avenue as a minor arterial in Richfield when Bloomington and
Minneapolis classify Nicollet Avenue as a collector north and
south of Richfield.
4) Richfield is requested to join Bloomington and Edina in
indicating policy support for actions which will improve
traffic circulation on the regional highway system:
-- Richfield should recognize the function of 76th Street as part
of the "ring route" system serving local east -west traffic
in the I -494 corridor;
-- Richfield should consider policy support for an additional two
lanes for I' -35W which would be dedicated to use by buses and
car pools.
5) The regional bicycle corridor along the east side of Cedar Avenue
is shown as a class III, on- street facility in transportation
figure 20 and the lowest implementation priority in transportation
figure 21. Considering the importance of this route in linking
the Minneapolis parkway system with the State trail system in
the Minnesota River Valley, it would be judicious to designate
this corridor as a class I or class II bikeway with a level I
or level II priority.
We hope these comments are helpful to you in your review of the
Richfield Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions regarding
this matter, please contact Larry Lee, Associate Planner of our
Planning Division staff.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Division of City Planning
A l n J. Grussing
Director of Planning
LL:ch
cc: Metropolitan Council
P]
Ift-
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 211
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Approval of Final Plans and Specifications
and Authorization to Advertise for Bids,
Rich Acres Park Improvement Project
The 1981 Capital Improvement Budget includes a $50,000
appropriation from the special revenue fund for improvements
at Rich Acres Park. Neighborhood meetings have been held,
and tentative park plans approved by the neighbors who were
in attendance at the meetings. The Park and Recreation
Advisory Commission has also reviewed the plans, and
recommended them to the council for approval. A sketch of the
proposed park design plan is attached.
The major improvements include earthwork and work with
the ponding area. This would probably need to be contracted,
as the city does not have the manpower nor the equipment to
undertake earthmoving and cut - and -fill work. Other elements
of the plan, such as a ballfield backstop, play equipment
assemply and installation, and landscaping, could most likely
be performed with city labor and equipment. Various supplies
and materials will need to be purchased to complete these
components of the plan, and purchase items in excess of $.1,000
will need specific council approval at such time as they are
purchased. It is anticipated that work would begin in August,
and be completed this construction season.
It is recommended that the city council approve the final
plans and specifications for the Rich Acres park improvement
project, and that the city council authorize the staff to
advertise for bids as legally required and proceed with
construction of the project.
Re pectfully submitted,
i ' MJe'1t19\
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Community Services Director
Q
q \�1 c'
:ZA
O
•
1
.o
j�
M { d4l
r
N�
1
1p
•-
•
•v � f ,
r
I
t�
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 210
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf ield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Relating to Deferred Compen-
sation Program for City Manager
On May 26, 1981 the city council adopted a resolution pur-
suant to Minnesota State Law which would enable the Richfield City
Manager to opt out of participation in the state's Public Employee
Retirement Association, and to instead participate in the Inter-
national City Management Association deferred compensation plan.
There is an item on the June 22, 1981 city council agenda which
would provide for specific authorization to the city manager to
participate in the ICMA Retirement Corporation. The first item
is a resolution which would authorize an agreement between the
city and the city manager to compensate the city manager in addition
to his regular compensation for that amount of money which ordinarily
would be paid by the city to PERA. This resolution provides that
this additional payment to the city manager in lieu of PERA contrib-
utions shall be made only under terms of, and so long as there is
in force, an agreement between the city and the city manager pro-
viding that that additional compensation will be used for deferred
compensation through the ICMA -RC. The second attachment is the
agreement itself which would provide for the ICMA -RC contribution.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the resolution
and authorize the City Manager and Mayor to execute the agreement.
Res ectfully submitted,
�D
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN /eja
cc: City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT WITH
CITY MANAGER RELATING TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION
WHEREAS, Karl Nollenberger ( "Nollenberger "), City Manager of
the City of Richfield, has elected to be excluded from
membership in the Public Employees Retirement Association,
which election has been approved by the city council, and
WHEREAS, prior to such action the city has contributed an
employer's contribution to the Public Employees Retirement
Association for his account, and
WHEREAS, by reason of such election, the city's employer
contribution to PERA on his account will cease, and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.025, Subdivision 3,
provides as follows:
"[DEFERRED COMPENSATION; CITY CONTRIBUTION.] If an
election of exclusion is made, and if the city manager
and the governing body of the city agree in writing
that the additional compensation is to be deferred
and shall be contributed on behalf of the city manager
to a deferred compensation program which meets the
requirements of section 457 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended through December 31, 1980,
the governing body may compensate the city manager,
in addition to the salary allowed under any limita-
tion imposed on salaries by law or charter, in an
amount equal to the employer contribution which would
be required by section 353.27, subdivision 3, if the
city manager were a member of the association."
WHEREAS, the city council desires to exercise the authority
conferred by the aforementioned Subdivision 3,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. In addition to the city manager's salary now in
effect or which may hereafter be established from time to
time as his stated salary, Nollenberger shall be compensated
in an additional amount equal to the employer contribution
which would be required by Minnesota Statutes, Section
353.27, Subdivision 3, if he were a member of the Public
Employees Retirement Association subject, however, to the
provisions of the following paragraph.of this resolution.
2. Such additional compensation shall be paid only if
and during the time that there is an agreement between City
and Nollenberger wherein it is agreed in writing that the
additional compensation is to be deferred and shall be
contributed on behalf of Nollenberger to a deferred compen-
sation program which meets the requirements of Section 457
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through
December 31, 1980.
3. The mayor, acting for and in behalf of the city,
is hereby authorized and directed to enter into an agreement
of a type described in the foregoing paragraph no. 2 with
Nollenberger. Upon the execution of such agreement, the
mayor, city manager and other appropriate officials of the
city are authorized to take the actions necessary to give
effect to the provisions of such agreement.
AGREEMENT RELATING TO
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of
, 1981, by and between City of Richfield, a
Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and KARL NOLLENBERGER,
a natural person serving in the capacity of City Manager of
City ( "Nollenberger "), WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Nollenberger has elected to be. excluded from member-
ship in the Public Employees Retirement Association of the
State of Minnesota, which election has been approved by the
City Council of the City, and
WHEREAS, both City and Nollenberger are desirous of having
an amount equal to the employer contribution which would be
required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.27, Subdivision 3,
if Nollenberger were a member of the Association, added to
his other compensation, of whatever kind or nature, and
contributed on behalf of the City Manager to a deferred
compensation program which meets the requirements of Section
457 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended through
December 31, 1980, and
WHEREAS, the fund of the International City Management
Association - Retirement Corporation qualifies as such a fund;
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Nollenberger agree as follows:
1. City agrees to increase Nollenberger's compensation
in an amount equal to the employer contribution which would
be required by Section 353.27, Subdivision 3, if the City
Manager were a member of the Public Employees Retirement
Association. This compensation shall be in addition to his
stated salary now in effect or which may hereafter be
established from time to time.
2. City and Nollenberger agree that such additional
compensation is to be deferred and shall be contributed on
behalf of Nollenberger to the deferred compensation fund of
the International City Management Association - Retirement
Corporation.
3. The provisions of this agreement are effective
immediately upon the effective date of Nollenberger's
election to be excluded from membership in the Public
Employees Retirement Association.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement this day of June; 1981.
WITNESSED BY: CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
Its Mayor
(SEAL)
KARL NOLLENBERGER
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 209
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Release of Bond for Off - street
Parking Contract, 6533 Cedar Avenue South
On April 23, 1979, the city council authorized
execution of an off - street parking contract with Anthony
D. Ogunlanoh, for 6533 Cedar Avenue South.
An inspection of the site by the city staff_ indicates
that the owner has complied with all terms of the off - street
parking agreement. Therefore, it is recommended that the
city council adopt the attached resolution, authorizing
release of the performance bond for this off - street parking
contract.
Respectfully submitted,
4 'q � V'"
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND
ON OFF - STREET PARKING
Anthony 0. Ohunlanoh
1708 Walnut St.
Eagan, MN 55122
Location: 6533 Cedar Avenue
Use: Office
WHEREAS, Anthony 0. Ohunlanoh, 1708 Walnut Street, Eagan,
Minnesota, had an off - street parking agreement with the City
of Richfield relating to 6533 Cedar Avenue, which contract
'bears the designation of Contract No. 2300, and which contract
was guaranteed by a bond in the amount of Four Thousand Dollars
($4,000), and
WHEREAS, said Anthony 0. Ohunlanoh has substantially
complied with the provisions of said agreement and now seeks
to be relieved of any further obligation under said bond, and
WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring
said Anthony 0. Ohunlanoh to continue to provide a bond for
security on the performance of said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to
release Anthony 0. Ohunlanoh for any and all acts committed or
incurred in violation of said Contract No. 2300, on and after
the 8th day of June, 1981.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
8th day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
ATTEST:
Svlvia K. Bergh, . City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 208
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Release of Bond for Off - street Parking
Contract, 7701 Harriet Avenue South
On November 13, 1979, the city council authorized
execution of an off - street parking contract with Jerome V.
Blatz in conjunction with the construction of an addition
to the law offices at 7701 Harriet Avenue South.
An inspection of the site by the city staff indicates
that the owner has complied with all terms of the off - street
parking agreement. Therefore, it is recommended that the
city council adopt the attached resolution, authorizing
release of the performance bond for this off - street parking
contract.
Resp ctfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
I RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND
ON OFF - STREET PARKING
Jerome V. Blatz
7701 Harriet Avenue South
Location: Same as Above
Use: Law Office
WHEREAS, Jerome V. Blatz, 7701 Harriet Avenue, Richfield,
Minnesota, had an off - street parking agreement with the City of
Richfield relating to 7701 Harriet Avenue, which contract bears
the designation of Contract No. 2318, and which contract was
guaranteed by a bond in the amount of Four Thousand, Three Hundred
Dollars ($4,300), and
WHEREAS, said Jerome V. Blatz has substantially complied with
the provisions of said agreement and now seeks to be relieved of
any further obligation under said bond, and
WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring
said Jerome V. Blatz to continue to provide a bond for security
on the performance of said agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to
release Jerome V. Blatz for any and all acts committed or incurred
in violation of said Contract No. 2318, on and after the 22nd day
of June, 1981.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
22nd day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 207
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Permanent Easement for 66th Street
Construction
The staff recommends that the council approve the
attached resolution to allow the Mayor and the City Manager
to execute the quit claim deed to convey a permanent
easement to Hennepin County. This permanent easement would
be for the installation and maintenance of a signal control
box and related equipment for the traffic signal to be
located at Lake Shore Drive and 66th Street. A drawing of
the easement location is attached.
Respectfully submitted,
go mj-�n
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO EXECUTE QUIT CLAIM DEED
FROM THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO HENNEPIN COUNTY
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has requested a permanent easement
be granted for the installation and maintenance of a signal box
and related equipment; and
WHEREAS, the city of Richfield intends to grant this permanent
easement to Hennepin County;
Now therefore be it resolved, that the City Manager and the
Mayor are authorized to execute a Quit Claim Deed conveying the
City of Richfield's interest over that part of the northeasterly
10 feet of Lot B, Lynnwood, according to the duly recorded plat
thereof which lies between the southwesterly extension of the
northwesterly line of Lot 4, Block 1, said addition and the
southwesterly extension of the southeasterly line of the westerly
20 geet of Lot 3, Block 1, said addition, to Hennepin County.
Also a permanent easement for highway purposes over that part
of said Lot B which lies northeasterly of a line drawn from
a point on the east line of said Lot B distant 35 feet south of
the northeast corner of said lot, to a point on the northeast
line of said lot distant 40 feet northwesterly of said northeast
corner.
Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
thsi 22nd day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe
Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh
City Clerk
o�
.�
��
0
_� '/
f
� - D
• \ C7
S��d 1
��0�`
..emu.
l • �'• � �.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 206
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Hearing on Application for On -Sale
Wine License, Pontillo's Pizzeria
The city has received an application for an on -sale wine
license for the Pontillo's Pizzeria, located at 2312 West
66th Street.
Prior to, or concurrent with, the council's consideration
of the on -sale wine license, council action is also required
to provide a special use permit for this form of business
establishment. Due to scheduling problems, the Planning
Commission will not be considering the application for a
special use permit until their regularly scheduled meeting
on June 23, 1981.
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Public Safety
Director, in which I concur, that the hearing on the applica-
tion for an on -sale wine license for Pontillo's Pizzeria be
scheduled for the regular council meeting of July 13, 1981.
At that time, the council can consider both the wine license
application and the recommendation of the Planning Commission
with regard to the special use permit.
Respectfully submitted, mje,
�4 9D e
Karl Nollnberger
City Manager
cc: Public Safety Director
Community Development Director
City Clerk
/,5
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 205
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: 'Amendment to the City's Year IV, VI
and VII Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Programs
We have been advised that it is necessary to amend
the city's Year IV, VI and VII CDBG programs relating to the
site acquisition and clearance project.
One option the city has for using the site acquisition
project funds is to purchase a home and then rent it to a
low or moderate income family through the "Section 8 existing'
program. The HRA has purchased, and is currently renting
out, the property at 6617 Lake Shore Drive using this option.
Hennepin County has recently informed us that the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined
that any rents received from properties purchased with CDBG
funds are program income; HUD requires that all program income
must be turned back to them.
To avoid having to turn these rent monies back, the
County has recommended that we amend our Year IV, VI and VII
CDBG site acquisition and clearance project to include a
revolving maintenance fund. The rents received from properties
such as 6617 Lake Shore Drive will then be placed in this
revolving fund to cover the HRA's costs of maintaining such
property. Any rental monies received in excess of the HRA's
actual maintenance costs must be turned back. However, the
county has indicated that they will reprogram any turned
back monies into the site acquisition project, so that the
funds will not be lost by the city.
It is recommended that the city council amend the Year
IV, VI and VII CDBG site acquisition and clearance project,
by establishing a revolving maintenance fund.
Respectfully submitted,
Ir
Karl Nollenberger
�7- f / cy--
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 204
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Adams Hill Park Change Order
There is a change order on the June 22, 1981 city
council agenda relating to the Adams Hill Park redevelopment
project. Barr /Nelson, Inc. is the contractor for the
building. The change order includes electrical items,
such as ground wire size increases in the amount of $1,026.94,
and includes additional fill material that was needed at the
building site in the amount of $2,972.90. The net effect of
the change order is an increase to the contract in the
amount of $3,999.84.
It is recommended that the city council approve this
change order, which will adjust the total contract sum to
$172,085.84. The scheduled project completion date is
August 1, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
V-0 .
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Community Services Director
Finance Coordinator
RMT
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 203
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Relating to International
Year of Disabled Persons
For the past several weeks, the Richfield Human Rights
Commission has been working in conjunction with the Richfield
Senior Citizens /Handicapped Commission and the Chamber of Commerce
regarding accessibility of public facilities and business places
for all persons. During the first week of July, 1981 a letter,
listing various suggestions for handicapped accessibility, will be
sent to 411 businesses and public agencies in the City of Richfield.
As part of this program, a resolution supporting this project
has been placed on the June 22, 1981 city council agenda for city
council approval. Members of the Human Rights Commission will be
present at the June 22, 1981 city council to accept this resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
J40 UJInn
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN /eja
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO BUSINESS PLACE
ACCESSIBILITY BY HANDICAPPED PERSONS
WHEREAS, 1981 has been declared as the International Year
of Disabled Persons, and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota is one of seven states in
the country recognized as a leader in providing services and
opportunities to disabled persons, and
WHEREAS, the Richfield Human Rights Commission realizes the
importance of increasing public awareness and sensitivity to the
need for eliminating barriers to employment- education, housing,
public service and public accommodations for the disabled, and
WHEREAS, in support of the International Year of Disabled
Persons the Richfield Human Rights Commission has begun a program
to make business establishments more aware of changes that could
be made to make the establishments more accessible to handicapped
persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield that we hereby support this program and the
observance of 1981 as the International Year of Disabled
Persons and urge the support of all persons in providing business
accessiblity to handicapped persons.
Done at the City of Richfield this 22nd day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk
Hiliiim ca
0
cc
c
LM
July 1, 1981
The Richfield Human Rights Commission, Senior /Citizen
Handicapped Commission, and the Richfield Chamber of
Commerce are writing this letter to you as a business-
person or a public service agency in Richfield.
It is our belief that all public facilities and business
places should be accessible to all persons. Because
1981 has been declared the "International Year of Dis-
abled Persons ", we encourage you to make any adjustments
to make your place of business barrier -free and easily
accessible to handicapped persons.
Some of our suggestions are very basic and would cost
you nothing to implement; however, others could become
a part of your remodeling plans for the months ahead.
Suggested changes that could be made to accommodate
persons who are in wheelchairs, require canes or crutches,
have impaired vision, or have problems such as disability
due to illness, injury or aging, are attached. We urge
you to incorporate changes to provide accessibility and
a greater degree of dignity for all members of our
community.
We are developing follow -up plans, and we welcome your
suggestions and comments.
Sincerely,
Diane McKeown
Richfield Human Rights
Commission
869 -2040
Wendell Treichel, President
Richfield Chamber Commerce
869 -0365
Myrtle Schmidt, Chairperson
Richfield Senior Citizens/
Handicapped Commission
869 -9476
Robert Lien, Secretary
Richfield Chamber Commerce
869 -5588
telephone: 869 -7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
N
d'
LO
LO
CU
E
Hiliiim ca
0
cc
c
LM
July 1, 1981
The Richfield Human Rights Commission, Senior /Citizen
Handicapped Commission, and the Richfield Chamber of
Commerce are writing this letter to you as a business-
person or a public service agency in Richfield.
It is our belief that all public facilities and business
places should be accessible to all persons. Because
1981 has been declared the "International Year of Dis-
abled Persons ", we encourage you to make any adjustments
to make your place of business barrier -free and easily
accessible to handicapped persons.
Some of our suggestions are very basic and would cost
you nothing to implement; however, others could become
a part of your remodeling plans for the months ahead.
Suggested changes that could be made to accommodate
persons who are in wheelchairs, require canes or crutches,
have impaired vision, or have problems such as disability
due to illness, injury or aging, are attached. We urge
you to incorporate changes to provide accessibility and
a greater degree of dignity for all members of our
community.
We are developing follow -up plans, and we welcome your
suggestions and comments.
Sincerely,
Diane McKeown
Richfield Human Rights
Commission
869 -2040
Wendell Treichel, President
Richfield Chamber Commerce
869 -0365
Myrtle Schmidt, Chairperson
Richfield Senior Citizens/
Handicapped Commission
869 -9476
Robert Lien, Secretary
Richfield Chamber Commerce
869 -5588
telephone: 869 -7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBILITY SUGGESTIONS
1. Provide legal parking spaces for the handicapped close to
buildings-and a ramped curb.
2. Ramps, rather than stairs or curbing.
3. Paint curbs to make a change of grade height more visible.
4. Textured or painted markings at the top and bottom approaches
of ramps to indicate a change of grade.
5. Make the public aware of elevators in your building.
6. Handrails on all stairways and ramps should extend one foot
beyond top and bottom steps.
7. Slip resistant floors; if carpeted, a tight weave and low pile.
8. Building entrances at ground level with free passage for wheel-
chairs; even a one -half inch rise could make passage difficult.
9. Level thresholds to buildings and rooms.
10. Level walks with no curbs at crossways or from parking lots.
11. Wide door openings -at least 42 inches.
12. Yellow, white, or luminour paint on the top and bottom risers
and steps on stairs to indicate the end of the steps.
13. Restrooms on main floor with wide stalls for wheelchair users
and grab bars 32 to 34 inches high; low hanging towels.
14. Lower drinking fountains and public telephone for wheelchair users.
15. Benches or chairs for resting near the front and rear of facility.
16. Restaurants have at least one table high enough to accommodate
a person in a wheelchair.
17. Eliminate heavy doors (automatic /sliding /air doors instead).
18. Wheelchairs for use in large stores.
19. Well- lighted ramps, walkways, stairs and parking lots.
20. Bonded back skid -proof rugs.
21. Instruct employees to assist those who may not be able co
reach or carry merchandise.
22. Wide, uncluttered aisles and checkouts to accommodate
wheelchairs.
23. Sidewalks and entryways clear of snow, ice and debris.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
V
Council Letter No. 202
Agenda June 22, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Vacation of a Portion of Aldrich
Avenue Adjacent to Lyndale Garden Center
The Richfield HRA has requested that the portion of
Aldrich Avenue (depicted on the attached map and described
in the HRA resolution) be vacated. This street vacation
will permit the HRA to sell a parcel of land to Lyndale
Fruit and Vegetable Market, Inc., to be used for installation
of a parking lot in accordance with the Planned Unit Develop-
ment Plan, and off - street parking plan, previously approved
by the city council. Lyndale Fruit and Vegetable Market, Inc.
has agreed to pay for installation of a new cul -de -sac
within the existing right -of -way immediately to the north of
the area to be vacated.
On January 19, 1981, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the Lyndale Garden Center Planned Unit Development
Plan, including the vacation of Aldrich Avenue.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached
resolution acknowledging receipt of the street vacation request,
and setting a public hearing on this matter for July 27, 1981.
It is further recommended that the council give first reading
approval to the attached transitory ordinances, vacating this
portion of Aldrich Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
V l140
c
Nollenberge
City Manager
cc: Community Development Director
City Engineer
City Clerk
qRA
Jun
T
he
1 0
t
.01
Ir
ed
--4
r
1-d
0
rr
0
0
F-
rL
rs
C:
ID
rt
0
v
CD
(D
0
0
W
rr
(D
a
71
AV
CL
L
Y
AV
J
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PETITIONING
THE CITY COUNCIL TO
VACATE A PORTION OF
ALDRICH AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(HRA) is administering the L /H /N Redevelopment Project heretofore
adopted by the HRA and the City of Richfield (the "City "), and
WHEREAS, the HRA entered into a Contract for Private Development
(agreement) with the Lyndale Fruit and Vegetable Market, Inc. (Developer)
dated March 18, 1981, in furtherance of the objectives of,the project,
and goals and
WHEREAS, the Agreement calls for the construction of improvements
in the area now occupied by Aldrich Avenue South, and
WHEREAS, the HRA is the owner of property on both sides of
Aldrich Avenue including the cul -de -sac which property is required
by the Developer for the construction of improvements, and
WHEREAS, the Agreement requires the Developer to pay for the
installation of a new cul -de -sac north of the area to be vacated,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE RICHFIELD HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
1. The Chairman and Executive Director are authorized to sign a
petition for the vacation of that portion of Aldrich Avenue South
lying south of the following described line:
The north line of Lot 1, Block 2, C. B. Adam's addition
as extended to its intersection with the West right -of -way
line of Aldrich Avenue.
2. The Executive Director is directed to present the petition
to the City Council for their action.
Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield
this 1st day of June, 1981.
ATTEST:
Michael Freeman, Secretary
Thomas E. Harms, Chairman
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECEIVING STREET
VACATION PETITION AND CALLING
FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City Clerk request-
ing the vacation of a public street described as follows:
That portion of Aldrich Avenue South lying south of the
following described line:
The north line of Lot 1, Block 2, C.B. Adam's
addition as extended to its intersection with
the west right -of -way line of Aldrich Avenue
WHEREAS, said petition complies in all respects with the require-
ments of Richfield Ordinance Code 12.04, Subdivision 2.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RICHFIELD AS FOLLOWS:
1. The petition for vacation of that portion of Aldrich Avenue
described above is received.
2. A public hearing on the alley vacation in said petition
shall be held on July 27, 1981.
3. The City Clerk is directed to publish notice of such hear-
ing in the official newspaper of the city and post notice of said
hearing in the manner provided by Richfield Ordinance Code Section
12.04, Subdivision 3.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd
day of June, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING
FOR THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC STREET
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The following portion of Aldrich Avenue South
is hereby vacated:
That portion of Aldrich Avenue South lying south of the
following described line:
The north line of Lot 1, Block 2, C.B. Adams addition
is extended to its intersection with the west right -
of -way line of Aldrich Avenue.
Section 2. Easements shall be maintained for all utilities
currently in place within the portion of street to the vacated.
Section 3. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to take
such action as is required to give effect to vacation of the public
right -of -way as provided in the foregoing section 1.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this day of 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Setting Date
of Tax Exempt
Agency
Council Letter No. 201
Agenda June 22, 1981
of Hearing for Issuance
Bonds, Richfield State
At a concurrent meeting of the city council and HRA
scheduled for Monday, July 20, the Richfield State Agency
(RSA) will make a presentation regarding a redevelopment
project which they propose to begin late this fall or early
in 1982. They have retained the professional services of
several organizations to assist in formulation of a
development package: Gruen, Gruen & Associates, San Francisco,
examinded market economic feasibility, Myers & Bennett (BRW)
is responsible for the design work, and Juran& Moody are the
financial consultants.
To help achieve an early construction date, Richfield
State Agency has asked that the city council take a preliminary
step related to financing for the redevelopment. The redevelop-
ment proposal is based upon securing a tax - exempt mortgage.
The city council, however, must authorize this type of
financing. Prior to considering authorization, a public
hearing must be held. Given the laws relating to publishing
the notice and the printing schedule of the Richfield Sun,
it is recommended that the council take action at the June
22, 1981 council meeting to schedule this public hearing. The
recommended date of the hearing is July 20, 1981. Following the
hearing, the council will consider a resolution which would
indicate preliminary approval of the tax - exempt financing plan.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the
attached resolution, establishing the date of public hearing
on tax exempt financing for the Richfield State Agency
development for July 20, 1981.
P Ntfully submitted,
9D ollenberge
City Manager
cc: Community Development Director
Housing & Redevelopment Coordinator
Administrative Services Director
Finance Coordinator
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION CALLING A
PUBLIC HEARING ON A
PROPOSED PROJECT'UNDER
THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT
WHEREAS: Richfield State Agency, a_Minnesota Corporation
(the "Company "), has proposed that the City undertake and finance
a project under the Municipal Industrial Development Act Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act ");.and
WHEREAS: the Act, as amended, requires that a public
hearing on the proposed project be conducted by the Council before
any action may be taken by it relative -to the proposed project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD:
1. The Council shall meet at 7. 0 p.m. on Monday, July 20, 1981
to conduct a public hearing on the proposed project requested
by the Company and to take whatever action in relation thereto
as it deems appropriate.
2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to publish notice
of the hearing in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A once
in the official newspaper and once in the Minneapolis Tribune
a newspaper of general circulation in the City, not less than
15,days prior to-July 20,1981.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd day
of June, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh,
Citv Clerk
I EXHIBIT A
(Official Publication)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers in the
City Hall in the City of Richfield at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
July 20, 1981, to conduct a public hearing on.a proposal that
the city undertake-and finance a project under the Municipal
Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes,-Chapter 474.
The project is proposed by Richfield State Agency (the "Company ")
and consists of the acquisition and improvement of land in the
city and the construction and equipping thereon of additional
facilities for and the expansion of the Richfield State Agency
facility for use in its business of the leasing of retail
commercial properties for banking and other businesses. The
principle amount of bonds or other obligations proposed to
be issued by the city to finance the project is estimated to
be not in excess of $
A draft copy of a proposed application to the Minnesota Commissioner
of Securities, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto,
is available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk
in the City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota
55423, during regular city business hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.)
daily, except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.
Any person wishing to express a view with respect to the proposal
to undertake and finance the project will be heard at the public
hearing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION CALLING A
PUBLIC HEARING ON A
PROPOSED PROJECT'UNDER
THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT
WHEREAS: Richfield State Agency, a.Minnesota Corporation
(the "Company "), has proposed that the City undertake and finance
a project under the Municipal Industrial Development Act Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act ");.and
WHEREAS: the Act, as amended, requires that a public
hearing on the proposed project be conducted by the Council before
any action may be taken by it relative -to the proposed project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD:
1. The Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, July20, 1981
to conduct a.public hearing on the proposed project requested
by the Company and to take whatever action in relation thereto
as it deems appropriate.
2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to publish notice
of the hearing in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A once
in the official newspaper and once in the Minneapolis Tribune
a newspaper of general circulation in the City, not less than
15 days prior to -July 20,1981.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 22nd day
of June, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:_
Sylvia K. Bergh,
Citv Clerk
EXHIBIT A
(Official Publication)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers in the
City Hall in the City of Richfield at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
July 20, 1981, to conduct a public hearing on_a proposal that
the city undertake-and finance a project under the Municipal
Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes,.Chapter 474.
The project is proposed by Richfield State Agency (the "Company ")
and consists of the acquisition and improvement of land in the
city and the construction and equipping thereon of additional
facilities for and the expansion of the Richfield State Agency
facility for use in its business of the leasing of retail
commercial properties for banking and other businesses. The
principle amount of bonds or other obligations proposed to
be issued by the city to finance the project is estimated to
be not in excess of $ 9 p poi 000 .
A draft copy of a proposed application to the Minnesota Commissioner
of Securities, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto,
is available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk
in the City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota
55423, during regular city business hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.)
daily, except Saturdays, Sundays and ,holidays.
Any person wishing to express a view with respect to the proposal
to undertake and finance the project will be heard at the public
hearing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk