08-10-81 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 282
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Dlayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council riembers
Subject: Financing for Public Safety Building
Improvement Project
As was noted in the council letter included in the council
packet, the city received bids last week for the public safety build-
ing improvement project. Unfortunately, the bids exceeded our earlier
projections of cost (even the contractor that gave us the original
estimate bid around $100,000 in excess of their earlier estimate).
The earlier estimate for construction cost exceeded our budget by
$91,000 even at that time. The budget, .estimate and actual figures
are as follows:
Budget Estimate Actual
$800,000 $891,000 $1,000,000
The project costs include construction ($813,300) architectural
fees ($108,000) , office systems ($45,000) , furniture, fixtures, and
furnishings ($41,800), telephone installation and soil borings ($7590)
and contingency ($40,000). We are expecting to reduce the contract
award by $46,190 in order to bring the total project cost down to the
$1,000,000 total cost figure.
In order to award a bid at this level, the budget for the project
will have to be increased by $200,000. There are available funds in
next year's capital improvement budget of $100,000 from the Special
Revenue Fund profits. In addition, the fund balance in the Special
Revenue Fund can be reduced by $50,000 to reflect the reduced working
capital needs in the liquor operations as a result of the decline in
liquor inventory. Finally, the city will have revenue sharing avail-
ability in excess of that originally proposed in the Capital Improve-
ment Budget for 1982 of $50,000. This will be achieved by reducing
the allocation to the General Fund which has occurred through 1981
and using those funds in the Capital Improvement Budget. This assumes,
however, that the council will not utilize the Revenue Sharing Fund
in the General Fund in order to balance the General Fund expenditures.
In 1983, the city council should be aware that an additional
appropriation of $50,000 is suggested for the public safety improve-
ment project for resolution of the parking problem. The 1983 appro-
Council Letter No. 282 -2- August 10, 1981
priation will pay for the one-time cost of installation of the 911
telephone system and some additional energy efforts which should be
made at the fire station. The on-going program of improvements to
the parking lot and the West Side Fire Station which were included
in the previous CIP for 1983 will also be included.
Alternative No. 1 to the bid for the public safety building im-
provement included the total roof repair to city hall. This project
has been anticipated in a separate Capital Improvement Budget account
entitled "Energy Improvements". There is $50,000 remaining in the
capital improvement account to do roofing repairs at city hall and the
central garage. We had anticipated approximately $25,000 worth of
improvements at city hall and $25,000 of improvements at the central
garage for roof repairs. However, the bid of $47,000 for a total re-
roofing job at city hall, makes it expedient to allocate more of the
funds to the city hall work. There is a five-year payback on the
energy savings which result from the city hall roofing project. How-
ever, some work will still have to be done at the central garage~in
order to protect the most crucial part of the roofing at that facility.
We estimate that $10,000 of expenditures will protect the central gar-
age roof until a capital improvement project can be added in 1984 to
complete that entire roofing area. We would recommend that the city
council pursue the roofing project at city hall out of the energy im-
provements account with the knowledge that an additional $10,000 of
appropriation will be needed in order to do the central garage before
1982.
It is recommended that the city council approve the bid for the
public safety building improvements including the bid for Alternative
No. 1, for roofing repair to city hall; and Alternative No. 6, which
eliminates performance of the contractor to remove parts of the boiler
equipment.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Karl Nollenbe`rger
City n7anager
KN/eja
cc: Community Services Director
Finance Coordinator
Public Safety Director
~~o
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 281
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Agenda August 10,19f
r
r
~ ~
~~
x~
~J ~~ C~ S ~ ~~'`r
~"`
~ G-C'
~ r~
Subject: Establishing Committee to Work on
Redistricting
The city charter provides that, beginning in 1982, three
council members are to be elected by district, one from each
of three districts which are to be established in the city.
The remaining council person and the mayor are to be elected
at large.
Before this election can take place, it is necessary that
the city establish these election districts. The boundaries
of the three districts should be established using data from
the 1980 federal census. The city council, on July 27, 1981,
discussed various means of establishing the boundaries for
the election districts. At that time, the city council requested
the staff to develop a resolution for council consideration,
which would establish a citizen committee to work on the
redistricting task.
Attached to this council letter is a proposed resolution
which would establish such a committee. The resolution
essentially outlines the composition of the committee, the
general nature of the task with which they are charged, and
some guidelines regarding the desired end product. The
resolution basically reflects what issues that the city
council discussed in their previous consideration of this
item.
It is recommended that the city council review the
proposed resolution establishing a citizen committee to work
on redistricting, make any necessary modifications, and
adopt a final resolution establishing a committee.
Respectfully submitted,
1
~ ~ ~ '
Karl rlollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Administrative Services Director
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A COMMITTEE TO WORK
ON REDISTRICTING
WHEREAS, the Richfield city charter provides that, beginning
in 19II2, three council members are to be elected by district, one
from each of three districts which are to be established in the
city; and
WHEREAS, before this election can take place, it is
necessary that the city establish these election districts; and
WHEREAS, the city council has determined that the process of
establishing such districts should provide for an active role
of citizen representatives;
BE IT RESOLVED, therefore, by this city council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
a. That there hereby be created a Citizen's Advisory
Redistricting Committee. ~ pP~,r~ ~d` ~°~ ~~ ~<<• ~~ ~`~,,.~ , 1
b. That the Committee shall serve in an advisory capacity
to the city council.
c. That the Committee should be comprised of no more than
seven (7) members who shall reside in the City of
Richfield and be of voting age.
d. That the composition of said Committee shall be as
follows:
1. Two (2) representatives from each of the two
major political parties, Independent Republican and
Democrat-Farmer-Labor;
2. One (1) representative from the League of Women
Voters.
3. One (1) representative who is air^,-^t^rc~? Ifi~nt
voter; w~,~ ~ ~ G ,, 'Z ..~ _ ~ ~ ,• _'.-Oil
4. One (1) representative who is involved in the field
of education, in governmental, public, or civic
studies.
\`,~~.
e. That the Committee shall be formed i-m~rec~i-~.:te.].~z and serve
until the city council has made a final decision
establishing election districts within the City of
Richfield.
f. That the Committee member who is the registered Independent
voter shall serve as chairperson of the Committee. All
Committee action shal-1 be in resolution form and must
receive majority vote approval of the members present.
Resolution No.
g. The purpose of the Committee is to develop at least
two alternative recommendations for city council
consideration in establishing election district
boundaries within the City of Richfield.
h. Staff support, materials, and facilities shall be
provided by the city at the direction of the city
manager.
i. The final decision regarding the establishment of
election districts or boundaries within the City of
Richfield will remain the sole authority of the city
council.
Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this 10th day of August, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
~ ~3
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 280
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Receipt of Bids for Public Safety Facility Improvement
Project
On Wednesday, August 5, 1981, bids were opened for the construction contract
on the Public Safety Facility Improvement Project. The bids received were
somewhat higher than what we had anticipated, considering the very competitive
situation in the present construction market. The increase basically relates
to the increased cost of the labor contracts which were recently settled in
the construction field. A total of fifteen bids from general contractors were
received. The base bids themselves ran from a lcw of $813,800 to a high of
$894,800, or a total bid range of approximately 10%. The average base bid
received, based on the total of fifteen bids submitted, was in an amount of
$840,136. Because there was only a 10% differential between the low base bid
and the high base bid it appears that all bidders have fairly accurately
addressed the requirements of our plans and specifications developed by our
architectural consultants.
In addition to the construction on the Public Safety Project, our bids also
included the installation of a new insulated roof on the existing City Hall/
Public Safety complex. Our 1981 Capital Improvement Program provides for
approximately $25,000 in necessary immediate roof repairs. The bids received
would indicate that we could replace the entire existing roof with a new in-
sulated energy efficient roof for only $45,700. This is an opportunity to which
we should give serious consideration.
The Public Safety Director, the City Clerk, and the City Manager were present
at the bid opening. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulations is attached for
council review and consideration prior to the scheduled council meeting for
Monday, August 10, 1981. Presently, and over the weekend, the Public Safety
Director and the architectural consultants will be evaluating the bids received
for compliance to the plans and specification requirements. We anticipate that
this review will be completed prior to Monday nights council meeting and we
would anticipate making a recommendation to the council at that time with re-
gard to this major Capital Improvement Project.
Re pectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/1 je
cc: Community Development Director
Public Safety Director
~~ .' ~r CITY OF RICHFIELD
J Bid Opening
August 5, 1981
Richfield Public Safety Addition
and Remodeling
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was
called by City Clerk Sylvia Bergh, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to
receive, open and read aloud, bids for the Richfield Public Safety Addition and Remodeling
as advertised in the official newspaper on July 8 and 15, 1981.
Present: Karl Nollenberger, City Manager
Tom Morgan, Public Safety Director
Joyce L. Wilde, Administrative Services Dir.
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
BIDDER AND ALT. ALT. ALT, ALT. ALT, ALT, ALT.
BID SECURITY BASE BID ~~1 ~~2 ~~3 ~~4 ~~5 ~~6 ~k7
Action Const. Co.
B.B. 5% $842,700 +53,400 +10,200 +3,400 -1,500 +1,200 -500
Adolfson & Peterson
B,B. 5% $819,900 +55,200 +10,000 +4,100 -1,84 NC%'~ -500
Arkay Construction -
B.B. 5% $823,000 +51,000 +10,000 +3,500 --1,200 NC -500
Crawford Merz
B.B. 5% $858,873 +57,224 +9,477 +3,511 -1,340 -400 NC
Bud Johnson
B.B. 5% $817,870 +53,896 +9,000 +3,610 -1,508 -47 NC
Kraus Anderson Bldg.
B.B. 5% $894,800 +52,000 +10,000 +4,020 -1,500 -700 -500 '
James Leck Co.
B.B. 5% $818,000 +50,600 +9,000 +4,000 -1,500 NC -400
Loeffel-Engstrand
B.B. 5% $823,790 +54,800 +9,500 +4,000 -1,600 -50 -520
Covering Associates
B.B. 5% $852,500 +53,500 +9,300 +4,300 -1,200 NC -500
Meisinger Construction
B.B. 5% $827,000 +55,400 +9,200 +3,500 -2,200 NC NC
ANC = No Change
~~ °~
Richfield Public Safety Addition
aad.Remodeling -..Bid_Continued
August 5, 1981
BIDDER AND ALT, ALT. ALT. ALT. ALT. ALT, ALT.
BID SECURITY BASE BID ~~I ~~2 ~~3 ~k4 ~k5 ~k6 ~~7
Henry 0. Mikkelson
B.B, 5% S842 ,000 +55,000 +11,000 +4,500 -1,200 NC -500
Rutledge Construction .-
B.B, 5% $813, 800 +45,718 +8,34b +3,614 -1,840 +120 -500
Shaw-Lundquist
B.B, 5% $850, 000 +55,000 +10,200 +4,000 -1,850 +300 -500
Sheehy Construction
B.B. 5% $867, 800 +54,000 +9,475 +4,150 -1,600 -175 -500 +2,250
James Steele Const.
B.B. 5% $850, 00 +48,436 +8,847 +3,100 -530 +642 NC
The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the regular
city council meeting of August 10, 1981.
Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk
~ ~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Off ice of City Manager
Council Letter No. 279
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable n?ayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Application for Permit to Sell Beer in
Park, Richfield Adult Softball Association
The City has received an application from the Richfield
Adult Softball Association for a permit to sell beer in Taft
Park. The Association is sponsoring the Men's "C" Division
Minnesota State District Slow-Pitch Softball Tournament from
Friday, August 21 through Sunday, August 23, 1981. All necessary
arrangements to conduct the tournament in Taft Park have
been made and the use of the park for tournament purposes, as
requested, has been approved by the Park and Recreation Com-
mission and the Department of Community Services. In connection
with the scheduled tournament, the Softball Association has
submitted an application to allow the sale of beer on Friday,
August 21, from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., on Saturday, August 22, -
from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and on Sunday, August 23, from
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
The Public Safety Department has received the application for
the sale of beer in the park and conducted the necessary back-
ground research with regard to this request. Based upon this
examination of the request, it is the opinion of the Public
Safety Department that the request is inconsistent in a number
of ways from the council-adopted policy related to the sale
of beer in the parks, as well as with the city ordinance
provisions governing the sale of non-intoxicating malt liquor
and relating to the sale and consumption of beer in the parks.
City Ordinance 4.17 controls the conditions under which
permits may be issued for the sale and consumption of beer in
parks. Under this code section, the city may require an
organization sponsoring an event with beer sales in the park
to submit "an indemnity bond holding the city harmless from
liability of any kind or character." In addition, the organiza-
tion must execute a "written agreement in form acceptable to the
city releasing the city from any claim by the organization and
holding the city harmless from any claims by others arising out
of or occasioned by cancellation. The council may also require an
indemnity bond in order to reimburse the city for any property
damage or clean-up costs. The intent of this section of the
code is to form a basis for holding the city harmless, or
indemnify the city from any liability arising out of the sale
of beer from either organization to whom the permit is issued
or from any individual bringing action against either the city
or the organization as a result of the sale of beer.
Council Letter No. 279 -2- August 10, 1981
The nature of this request differs from the two previous
requests in that the beer sales will take place in a less
controlled environment. Beer sales will be made to members
of the public and the softball teams, where the two previous
occasions encompassed beer sales only to members of organizations.
For this reason, if the council is inclined to grant the permit
and override other considerations in this letter, there should
be a request for comprehensive liability insurance with limits
of $1,000,000 and dram shop insurance as high as possible. The
softball association may have difficulty obtaining those
coverages however. A cleanup indeminity bond of $500 should also
be imposed.
Ordinance 4.17, subdivision 7(6), requires that the
applicant for a permit to sell beer in the park hold a current
and valid license issued by the city for the sale of non-
intoxicating malt liquor. Ordinance 11.02, which controls the
sale of non-intoxicationg malt liquor, allows, under subdivision 2,
for the issuance of a temporary permit, but such temporary permit /~
may not provide for sales for a period in excess of 12 hours.
The applicant in this instance has not met this ordinance code
requirement.
Ordinance 4.17, subdivision 8 allows the council to require
police officer(s) to•be in attendance at the function at the
organization's expense. At least one officer per field should
be required in this instance.
In addition to the problems outlined with regard to the
ordinance requirements, the request by the applicant does not
conform to the operational guidelines formally established by
the city council through resolution on May 26, 1981, relative
to the sale and consumption of beer in parks. Guideline No. 3
limits the issuance of a permit to a particular organization
to once per year. Guideline No. 4 limits the issuance of a
permit to only one day. The combination of these two quideline
requirements is inconsistent with the applicant's request to
allow beer sales on all three days of the scheduled tournament.
Additionally, Guideline No. 9 limits the sale of beer to the
hours of 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., while the applicant has
requested beer sales on two days from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
On Sunday, August 23, the applicant has requested beer sales
from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Ordinance 11.02, subdivision 8 (3)
prohibits the sale of non-intoxicating malt liquor prior to
12:00 noon on Sundays.
Based on the foregoing described conflicts between the
ordinance code requirements and the policy guidelines
established by the council relative to the sale and consumption
of beer in parks, it is the opinion of the Public Safety
Director, the Community Services Director and myself that the
requested permit for the sale of beer presented by the Richfield
Adult Softball Association should be denied. The denial of the
permit to sell beer does not affect the presently scheduled
softball tournament for Friday,•August 21 through Sunday, August 23,
Council Letter No. 279 -3- August 10, 1981
at Taft Park. G4e would anticipate that the tournament could be
held as scheduled, as it has for a number of years in the past,
without the sale of beer as a part of the tournament activity.
Respectfully submitted,
~I~~C~f~~"`
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Public Safety Director
Community Services Director
August 7, 19131
~~ 'd'
~
^ ~^r~ ~
^~
^
~t^~ ~
~ ~
0 ~
c
ca
-a~+
0
~"
^ ~~ O
O
(~
Mr. James B. Bell
7515 Vincent Avenue South
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
Dear Mr. Bell:
Thank you fio-• your phone call this mor•niny with regard to the
interest the Richfield Adult Softball Association has relating
to the sale of beer during your state tournament sctreduled for
August 21, tiiruuyh August 23, 1981.
If the Association is interested in limitiriy beer sales to only
one day, this action would be permissible under the existing
ordinance code requirement. the code does, however, require that
a clean-up deposit be submitted to the city prior to the issuance
of the requested permit. Additionally, the ordinance does require
the assignment of two po-lice officers to the park site during the
period of -time iir which beer is to be sold. The ordinance does
require the Association receiving the permit to sell beer to reim-
burse tyre city fur cost of police officers assigned to this duty.
The fees involved with your request to sell beer on Saturday, August
22nd, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., are as follows:
Perini t f=ee ,. ~ $ 10.00
Cost of two (2) police officers assigned
assigned to park during period of beer
sales. 268.00
Clean-up deposit (refundable if not used) 500.00
-' $778.00 ~--
In addition to the fees involved in the sale of beer in the parks,
our ordinance dues request the permit applicant to post a surety
bond, or other insurance coverage, to indemnify both themselves and
the -City of Richfiield from any claims arising from the sale of beer.
This coverage should be available frorrr the Associations regular
insurance carrier. The liability amount requested by the city for
telephone: 869-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
Page I tvu
the orie (1 } ~l,ry Luur'nanu•nt, i:, $1 ,000,OUO. The bond or certificate of insurance,
naniiny the city ~r~. an a~di tiunal insur'ecl, must be delivered to my of fice prior
to our• issuance of your reyuc~sted peruri I. on August 22, 1981 .
The c i t:,y cur.n~c i l will b~~ cun~> idErincJ th i issue a t thu i r regularly sr:hedu led
meeting on Mun~iay, August 10, 1981. 1 think it would I>e helpful For some
uteurber of thc~ t3oar~l of th~~ Sul tbal l Association to be present to address any
goes t i on s i uuric i I nrenrber•~> uii yh t have wi th regard to this matter. I f them
i s any way i n rJh i ch I can be u f furtl-~er assistance to you please do not hesitate
to contact nie.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Mor°gan, Jr.
U i rec tur of Public Sa f e l.y
TAM/lj~
cc : -~=i Cy Manager'
Community Development Uir•ector
~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter D?o. 278
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolutions relating to Maintenance
Assessments, L/H/N Redevelopment Area
On January 26, 1981, the city council adopted Resolution
No. 6372. This resolution, subsequent to a public hearing held
on January 12, 1981, established a policy that the actual cost
of performing current maintenance services in the L/H/N area
(which is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue,
67th Street and Emerson Avenue) would be specially assessed.
Special assessments to commercial property would be made on
the basis of area, with each square foot of assessable commercial
property within the district being assessed an equal amount. All
single family, two family, and multiple family residential
property within the L/H/N redevelopment area was eliminated
from the special assessment levy. The current maintenance services
would include, but not necessarily be limited to, one or more of
the following:
1. Landscaping, including tree trimming
2. Sidewalk sweeping in summer
3. Snow removal in winter
4. Sidewalk deicing
5. Painting and repair of wood furniture
6. Trash removal
7. General maintenance, including repairs and replacement
The total maintenance cost for the period January 1, 1981
through June 30, 1981 was estimated at $38,000, at the time of
the public hearing January 12, 1981. In actuality, total main-
tenance costs for the period January 1 through June 30, 1981,
are $45,029.05, to be assessed on a square foot basis to
commercial properties in the L/H/N.
Council Letter No. 278 -2- August 10, 1981
At the same time that the city council is holding a public
hearing related to the assessment role for the period of
January 1, 1981 througri June 30, 1981, it is recommended that
the council also hold a hearing for the purpose of establishing
a new maintenance assessment project for the L/H/N. It would
be the recommendation of the staff that the city council
establish the period of July 1, 1981 through December 31, 1981
with an estimated maintenance cost of $26,000, and secondly the
period of January 1 through December 31, 1982 with an estimated
maintenance cost of $81,000, to be assessed on a square footage
basis equally to all properties in the district as assessed
for the period of January 1, 1981 through June 30, 1981.
It is recommended that the city council take the following
actions:
1. Adopt the attached resolution declaring the cost to he
assessed and ordering preparation of the proposed
assessment roll for L.H.N maintenance for the period
of January 1, 1981 through June 30, 1981.
2. Adopt the attached resolution setting the hearing
for said proposed assessment for 7:00 p.m., Monday,
September 14, 1981.
3. Adopt the attached resolution proposing to specially
assess for the costs of current services provided
within the L/H/N project area for the period of
July 1, 1981 through December 31, 1981 and setting a
public hearing.
4. Adopt the attached resolution proposing to specially
assess for the costs of current services provided
within the L/H/N project area for the period of
January 1, 1982 through December 31, 1982, and setting
a public hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
~l, ~ ~.
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator
Community Development Director
Finance Coordinator
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
FOR L/H/N MAINTENANCE
WHEREAS costs have been determined for the maintenance
of the Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (L/H/N) Redevelopment Area which is
approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street
and Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield and the expenses
incurred or to be incurred for such maintenance amount of
$45,029.05,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited
property owners is declared to be $45,029.05.
2. The city clerk, with the assistance of the city
engineer and the facilities/project coordinator shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such
maintenance against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation,
as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed
assessment in her office for public inspection.
3. The city clerk shall upon the completion of such
proposed assessment notify the city council thereof.
Adopted by the city council of the city of Richfield this 10th
day of August, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the city council of
the City of Richfield on August 10, 1981, the city clerk was
directed to prepare assessment of the cost of maintaining the
Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (L/H/N) Redevelopment Area which is
approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street
and Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield, Minnesota, and
WHEREAS the city clerk has notified the city council
that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in
her office for public inspection,
-NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 14th day of September,
1981, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass
upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all
persons owning property affected by said maintenance assess-
ment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to
such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice
of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once
in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the
hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of
the maintenance. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given
to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll
not less than two weeks prior to the hearings.
Adopted by the city council of the city of Richfield this 10th
day of August, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COST OF
CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET PROJECT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. There is hereby established a special assessment
district, the boundaries of which are conterminous with the
Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area for the purpose
of assessing for current services provided by the city.
2. The following current services of the city are hereby
proposed to be undertaken by the city in the district with the
costs of such services to be specially assessed against benefited
` property within the district:
Snow, ice or rubbish removal.
Weed elimination
Removal or elimination of public health or safety
hazards from private property, excluding any
structure included under the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 463.15 to 463.26
InstGllation or repair of water service lines
Street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets
The trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound
trees
The treatment and rer~ioval of insect infested or diseased trees
The repair of sidewalks and alleys
The operation of a street lighting system
The maintenance of landscaped areas and other public
amenities on or adjacent to street rights-of-way
Snow removal and other maintenance of streets
Painting and repair of wood furniture
General maintenance, including repairs and replacement
3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such
current services consists of every assessable lot and parcel of
land within the district. It is proposed that special assessments
on commercial property be made on the basis of the area with each
square foot of assessable commercial property within the district
being assessed an equal amount. Exempt from the special assessment
levy shall be all single family, two family, multiple family res-
idential property within the L/H/N redevelopment area.
4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to publish
notice of a hearing by this council at which the council will
consider the undertaking of such current services and the levying
of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. Such notice
shall be published in the official newspaper at least once, at
least two weeks prior to the date of hearing. Such hearing
shall be held on Monday, September 14, 1981, commencing at
7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be
reached on the agenda.
Resolution No.
5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the
costs of the aforementioned services for the period from
January 1, 1981, through June 30, 1981. The estimated cost of
providing all of the aforementioned current services during that
period is $26,000.
Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield this 10th
day of August, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
' RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COSTS OF
CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET PROJECT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. There is hereby established a special assessment district,
the boundaries of which are conterminous with the Lyndale/Hub/
Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area for the purpose of assessing
for current services provided by the city.
2. The following current services of the city are hereby
proposed to be undertaken by the city in the district, with the
costs of such services to be specially assessed against benefited
property within the district:
Snow, ice or rubbish removal
Weed elimination
Removal or elimination of public health of safety
hazards from private property, excluding any
structure included under the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 463.15 to 463.26
Installation or repair of water service lines
Street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets
The trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound
trees
The treatment and removal of insect infested or diseased trees
The repair of sidewalks and alleys
The operation of a street lighting system
The maintenance of landscaped areas and other public
amenities on or adjacent to street rights-of-way
Snow removal and other maintenance of streets
Painting and repair of wood furniture
General maintenance, including repairs and replacement
3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such
current services consists of every assessable lot and parcel
of land within the district. It is proposed that special
assessments on commercial property be made on the basis of the
area with each square foot of assessable commercial property
within the district being assessed an equal amount. Exempt
from the special assessment levy shall be all single family,
two family, multiple family residential property within the
L/H/N redevelopment district.
4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to publish
notice of a hearing by this council at which the council will
consider the undertaking of such current services and the
levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. Such
notice shall be published in the official newspaper at least once,
at least two weeks prior to the date of hearing. Such hearing
shall be held on Monday, September 14, 1981, commencing at
7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be
reached on the agenda.
Resolution No.
5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the
costs of the aforementioned services for the period from
January 1, 1982 through December 31, 1982. The estimated cost of
~ providing all of the aforementioned current services during that
period is $81,000.
Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield this 10th
day of August, 1981.
Donald Priebe, Mayor
` ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
i
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 277
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Member of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Purchase in Excess $1,000
Chapter 6, section 6.05 of the city charter stipulates that the
city council must approve the purchase of materials, merchandise,
equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $1,000. There
are nine (9) such items on the city council agenda August 10, 1981.
BOILER REPAIR
Over the last few years, several necessary, but temporary,
repairs have been made to the boiler at the ice arena. Many of
these repairs have been to the bottom section of the rear tube
sheet and have consisted of welding the cracked tube ends. It
now appears that there are several additional cracks which have
developed. It would be devastating to the operation of the
arena if the boiler were to fail, expecially if a failure should
h~apper~ during the peak winter season. It is therefore recommended
that repair and replacement of the tubes in the rear tube sheet
be done. Three written quotations were received for the proposed
work. Kenny Boiler and Manufacturing Company quoted $8,550.
Shegstad Boiler Cleaning, Repair and Welding quoted $5,015. It
is recommended that the city council authorize the work as quoted by
Moorhead Machinery and Boiler Company in the amount of $4,270.
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
The 1981 park maintenance budget included funding to provide
various park furniture and improvements for special interest
groups. One of the items in that budget was playground equipment
to be located at the east youth complex in the vicinity of 66th
Street and 24th Avenue South. Quotations were received from two
companies for a slide, swing and four tot or infant seats.
Mexico Forge quoted $1,487 for the package. It is recommended
that the city council authorize the purchase of the playground
equipment package as briefly outlined from Minnesota Playground
Equipment, Inc. in the amount of $1,231.
Council Letter No. 277 -2- August 10, 19E1
LIQUID CARBON DIOXIDE
Liquid carbon dioxide is one of several chmicals used in the
treatment of water in the Richfield system. Richfield recently
participated in a joint bidding procedure with the City of
Minneapolis for this water treatment chemical for the period of
November 1, 1981 through October 31, 1982. The low bidder for
liquid carbon dioxide was the Cardox Division of Chemtron with a
base bid of $44.50 per ton, F.O.B. destination, with no cash
discount. Other bidders were Airco Industrial Gases with a unit
price of $64.00 per ton and Liquid Carbonic Corporation with a
unit price of $46.00 per ton. It is recommended that the city
council authorize the purchase of an estimated 200 ton of liquid
carbon dioxide, on a keep fill basis, 'at a unit price of $44.50.
The total purchase from the Cardox Division of Chemtron will equal
about $8,900, the funding for which is included in the operating
budget for the water maintenance division.
TREATED LUMBER
One of the items included in the city garage improvement
project was the provision of outside storage bins. The quote
fro:; Stewart Lumber would provide the necessary new wood treated
material for a purchase price of $8,316. Because MacGillis & Gibbs
is a wholesaler for this type of product, their quotation was
substantially less. It is recommended that the city council
authorize the purchase of 42 6" x 8" x 16", 63 6" x 8" x 10", and
35 6" x 8" x 12" for a total purchase price of $3,603.60 of new
treated lumber from MacGillis and Gibbs.
TENNIS COURT RESURFACING
The tennis courts at Augsburg Park are in need of repair.
Two courts were repaired prior to this year, and four courts are
proposed to be repaired in 1981 through the park maintenance
operating budget. The proposal would be to remove the existing
fiberglass surgace, clean the four courts, provide a tack coat,
fill cracks and low areas, install sand-filled asphalt emulsion,
install two layers of sand-filled acrylic color and install
playing lines. Five quotations were received for this work.
Henry O. Mikkelson Company and Accent Seal Coat Company each quoted
$7,200. Daily and Sons Blacktopping, Inc. quoted $6,590. C & H
Construction quoted $6,560. It is recommended that the city council
authorize the work of resurfacing four tennis courts at Augsburg
Park be done by Action Courts, Inc. per their quotation of $5,980.
UNDERGROUND ~aIRING
In the construction of improvements at Rich Acres Park, it has
been determined that the utility wiring needs to be place underground.
Northerr.States Power Company is the only vendor to do this work.
The quotation is $4,650. It is recommended that the city council
authorize the rerouting and undergrounding of two spans of primary
and secondary and one span of secondary overhead distribution by
NSP, in the amount of $4,650.
Council Letter No. 277 -3- August 10, 1981
GRADING
The Rich Acres Park improvement project will require grading.
The work would include removal of vegetation as specified, strip
and stockpile topsoil, grade for all paths., dredge the ponding
area, grade all fill material in berms, playlots, volleyball
courts and any other area, and furnishing of other grading and
related services. Of the three vendors responding to a request
for quotations, Sebesta Construction quoted $13,179, Volk Trucking
and excavating quoted $11,975, and G.L. Contracting, Inc.
quoted $7,875. It is recommended that the city council authorize
G.L. Contracting, Inc. to do the grading work at Rich Acres Park,
as briefly outlined above, for a total price of $7,875.
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
As part of the improvements at Rich Acres Park, it will be
necessary to extend the existing storm sewer piping, relocate
flared end pipe, provide some rip-rap areas, i.e., by using
stones or rocks, secure the spill area edges or sides, and
to establish a channel on the southern portion of the park
area for connection to the ponding area. Three vendors
provided quotations. RC?-SO Contracting, Inc. quoted $4,625.
G.L. Contracting, Inc. quoted $4,101. Q.R.S. Corporation, Inc.
quoted $4,000. It is recommended that the city council authorize
the storm sewer work at Rich Acres Park, as briefly outlined
above, be done by Q.R.S. Corporation in the amount of $4,000.
LIQUOR STORE SECURITY SYSTEM
Une of the observations made by the consultants in the
recently completed analysis of the city's liquor store operation
related to a need to improve security measures utilized in all
three liquor stores. Specifically, the consultants suggested
installation of some type of video surveilliance system for both
security of the cashier area, as well as for utilization as a
theft prevention measure on the retail sales floor. Improved
security of the liquor store operations has also been a concern
expressed by the Public Safety Department. Nationally, inventory
losses in retail outlets such as major food store chains and
discount department stores average from 2°e to 3% of gross sales
annually. With our liquor store gross sales exceeding $5,200,000
annually, our potential loss liability is a matter of significant
concern.
Based upon evaluations conducted by an outside auditing firm,
and an analysis of liquor store accounting records, it appears
that our experience of loss through pilferage is somewhat below
average. However, as members of the city council may recall, one
of the major problems of the current mechanical cash registers
utilized in the liquor store operation relates to their inability
to be utilized as a part of an accurate inventory control system.
With the action of the city council on July 27, 1981 authorizing
the purchase of electronic cash registers for all three stores,
our inventory control system will be substantially improved, and
our ability to immediately identify inventory shortages will be
greatly enhanced.
Council Letter No. 277 -4-
August 10, 1981
Presently, the physical facility security system utilized in the
three liquor stores consists of a parameter entry alarm system,
monitored by the Department of Public Safety, and utilized when the
stores are closed. During normal store hours, this same system
is converted to a holdup alarm system, which is also monitored by
the Public Safety Department, and includes various activation
devices located at strategic points throughout the stores. Additionally
both the Lyndale store and the Cedar store have fire alarms in
connection with their automatic sprinkler system installations,
which are also monitored by the Public Safety Department.
What all three liquor stores are presently lacking as noted
by the recent study, is a video surveillance system. Recently the
city council approved expansion of the existing viedo surveillance
system in the public safety area of city hall to include coverage
of the employee entrance to the city hall building itself, as well
as coverage of our licensing area. We are proposing a very similar
system to be installed in all three liquor stores. The system
would consist of two surveillance cameras in each store. Additionally,
the proposed system would provide for portable video recording
equipment, as well as automatic activation devices, that could be
moved from store to store on a periodic basis by the Public Safety
Department. Monitoring of this surveillance equipment would be
accomplished jointly by liquor store management personnel and public
safety officers. With the very accurate inventory control capability
of our new electronic cash register system, we would be able to
concentrate monitoring activity at any particular store which appears
to be experiencing an inventory loss problem.
The city has received a bid from Video Images, the same firm
that is installing the expanded surveillance system at city hall, for
the necessary equipment to provide coverage in all three liquor
stores for a total price of $6,225. The proposed equipment would
provide for a very flexible system that could meet our needs in all
three stores, and provide a significant deterent to inventory loss.
A bid for a similar system has been received from the 3M Alarm
System for a price of $9,300. It is recommended that the city
council authorize the purchase of the video surveillance system
from Video Images in the amount of $6,225. Funds for this purchase
are available in the 1981 liquor store budget. Delivery of the
surveillance system would be anticipated on or before November, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
i ~~
~~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Public Safety Director
Liquor Operations Director
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 276
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit and
Variance, 7745 Penn Avenue South
PROPOSAL
Walser Buick, Inc. has submitted a request for a special use
permit to allow the conversion of a gasoline service station
located at 7745 Penn Avenue South to a car sale~~ lot. The area
of the existing service station is 1,706 square feet. The proposal
calls for the construction of an addition 2,637 square feet. The
existing car wash and the gasoline pumps south of the building
will remain. The use of these facilities will be limited
to Walser's inventory only. The proposed lighting will be
consistent with the lighting on the applicant's adjacent car sales
lot. The structure will be used for sales offices and an indoor
automobile display area. The curb cuts on Penn Avenue and one
curb cut on the frontage road will be closed. The outside parking
area will be used for display, employee and customer off-street
parking. The existing sign on the southwest corner of the site
will be retained.
A variance is necessary to reduce the required 40-foot setback
from the street to the existing 25 feet. The original structure
was built in accordance with the required 40-foot setback in 1962.
Subsequently, the State of Minnesota constructed a frontage road
bordering the north and east sides of the site. This road required
taking a portion of the applicant's property, creating a "non-
conforming" use by creating an insufficient setback from the east
property line. The new addition is designed to meet all setback
requirements. The property is zoned "C-2" commercial.
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 3.33, subdivision 2 of the zoning ordinance includes
car sales lots as uses allowed by special use permit in "C-2" zones.
Section 3.33, subdivision 3 lists regulations relating to car sales
lots. Section 3.41, subdivision 5, sets criteria for issuing special
use permits, and Section 3.29, subdivision 2 lists regulations for
non-conforming uses, and provides that such non-conforming use
cannot be expanded.
Counc?1 Letter rlo. 276 -2- August 10, 1981
STAFF REVIEW
The staff has reviewed the proposal and application for special
use permit and found the following:
1. That the 50-foot visibility triangle at the frontage road/
Penn Avenue intersection will be obstructed. The proposal
indicates three display parking spaces violating this
requirement.
2. That the applicant does not indicate the use of banners,
noisy ribbons or other similar attention-distracting
devices.
3. That the plans do not indicate lighting, except to say
that it will be similar to that on the applicant's existing
car sales lot. In the past the city has received complaints
related to lighting spillover and reflection on neighboring
lots from Walser's existing sales lot. Walser has,
however, corrected these problems.
4. That the two curb cuts on Penn Avenue and one on the
frontage road will be closed. This should not pose
any traffic hazard or congestion in the area. The proposal
provides for ample off-street parking.
5. That the addition will architecturally match the existing
building and will meet all setback requirements.
STAFF FINDINGS: SPECIAL USE PERMIT
The staff has reviewed the application against the criteria
for issuing special use permits and found the proposal to be in
substantial compliance with these regulations.
STAFF FINDINGS: VARIANCE
2'he staff has reviewed the proposal and application for
variance and found the following:
1. That the existing building met all setback requirements at
time of its construction. The construction of the frontage
road resulted in the insufficient setback, which the
staff considers to be a special condition.
2. Denial of this variance will preclude the applicant from
using the property for a-car sales lot. However, the
property could be used as a gasoline service station.
The non-conforming use ordinance states that the use
shall not be substituted or the building structurally
altered unless the use is changed to a use permitted in
the district. Because of the specialized design of the
building, the use of the building for something other than
a gasoline service station would require structural
alteration. The staff feels that denial of this variance
will preclude reasonable use of this property.
Council Letter No. 276 -3-
August 10, 1981
3. The proposal is an improvement to the applicant's property
and should reduce the existing traffic congestion on
Penn Avenue in this area by closing the aforementioned
curb cuts. The proposal should not pose any hazards to
the public welfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: SFECIAL USE PERMIT
5ecause the proposal is in substantial compliance with the
conditions governing the issuance of special use permits the
staff recommends approval with the following stipulations:
1. That the applicant obtain the necessary variance.
2. That the lighting conform to all applicable city ordinances.
3. That the required 50-foot visibility triange at the corner
of Penn Avenue and the frontage road be unobstructed
and that the area be landscaped in accordance with a
plan approved by the city staff.
STAFF RECOI~IPIENDATIONS : VARIANCE
Because the three conditions for granting variances have been
met, the staff recommends approval of the requested variance
with the following stipulation:
1. That this variance is to reduce the existing structure's
required setback of 40 feet to the existing 25 feet from
the east property line only.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
`1'he Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested
special use permit and variance with the staff recommended
stipulations one and three for the special use permit, and with
the single staff-recommended stipulation to the variance. '
Respectfully submitted,
II,~ 4
~,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
`s'
. .. ~ cc~str~ctiaa co~pany
J ' ~.
~-
OF MINNESOTA INCORPORATED
July 13, 1981
To: City of Richfield
From: Ryan Construction Company
RE: Description of project involving Shell Oil Remodel.
The Shell Oil remodel involves approximately 3,000 sq. ft. of new
construction for the express purpose of developing a new car showroom
for Jack Walser. The facility would have several closing offices, a
new car managers office, and room to display approximately seven or
eight new vehicles.
The existing lot would be used for vehicle display. New exterior
lighting consistent with the type being used at Walser Buick is scheduled.
The existing car wash will be retained for private use only.
The building exterior will employ such materials as block and brick
with thermal break glass and glazing. Metal flashings would be bronze
to match the glass frames. Exterior signage is scheduled to use the
existing locations. The current entrances off of Penn Avenue would
be closed and city walk put in as part of the project. The two entrances
from the service road would remain as the means of access to the
facility. Customer parking, vehicle display and employee parking will
be designed into the current site.
Sincerely,
RYAN CONSTRUCTION COT
~-t1--,
f y B Rice
Project M nager
JBR/wm
HOME OFFICE: RYAN BUILDING. RIBBING. MINNESOTA 55746 -TELEPHONE 2 1 3 263-68238
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE: 7401 METRO BOULEVARD. SUITE 500 ONE CORP CENTER, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55435 -TELEPHONE 612835-7990
' I D~1TS: July 10, 1981
CI.". OF RICHFIELD, Richfield, Minnesota
Depa~t::e^~ of Public Works - Building Division
6700 Portland avenue South
(612) 869-7521
APPLICa~IOL? IS HERES' `•'.~'1DE FOR:
A change in zc^i::g xx Special L'se
Q A recuest for va__ance CJ Apartment Use
By: Walser Buick, Inc. ~ O~sner/Applicant
2100 W. 78th Street Acd~ess
Richfield City 869-1492 Bt:s. Phone
For the property or la::c located at: •
Aodress : 7745 Penn Ave. So. Plat Parcel
Subdivision: Not Applicable - Metes and Bounds Block Lot
Ge.^.eral dimensions o= ~:a~erty (attached all necessary dra~•:inns, :;;ass)
E:{fisting use of la:.d: Service Station
Existing zoning: General Commercial
Existing bulldli~GS? x?C: `~es No.
I
Proposed changes in use: New and Used Car Sales
Proposed changes in zc::_. None
Variance recues~ed: None
r.ttach all nece~~, __ :.:i::cs, ..,~^:, ~.._. it•~ ?,,v~lc:_:rc•,t ., ...
J
A~olicants Sicnatu:e
C:..c:
Fee Fccci~•e;l Ev "ecci;;' - `'~atc
~y~
i e E ~ ! ~ !~
•~ 1 j~F.<
I•I I I ~c i~ ~~'~
~ ~ ~~
~;:~~ ,
~~~~F
=c
t,;
~ c~
r
~'~
~~
~~~
t
~ ` F•.
I"
~i ~ -
s
~, -
~.
~. -
i
'I '
• ` •
i~
+S ~
I'
m !m
a
~~
.) F~ ~I
....._~
~ `~`
~ 4 <i
or ~
. Y
Z{
t CS ~
t
1
•1
~ E !-.- t
i ~ ` _`
~ 6~
,~ d
:.•
1..~~_
~~
/~../ Y ~~
' A../
.~
T
i
i
1
-t--
l ~
1 -
T- a
''
•
'..,.1 ' U
i ~
~ S
I
.~
~~
.;I
"I
__\yy ~
_ `---- _- ~/1
I,r b~r_ ~ ^ ~+
S =`-~ xi
i~ bc~ :-~ " 6J --
t -oO~_-_
_~
~ ` <
'l:-. ~
'~`'~~
::,__
A_~-'-J
4
r~
b /
I
,.
:i
I.i ~
I I I
~~ ~':s.
..,.! ~i
II~
Iljl~i
liiilil
~:.I~'
. ~~
~ ~~
~ ~~l
. ,
f
~'~~~
i a~~Qs;'
]~ ~ ~~
i ( ~ -v P
i f !~~
F~~
~...!=.y
• -
.D
m
Z Y~
Z {c
.j
e
D
m
Z
m
m ~ ~
~ ~-
~ c=~ ~
L s T R7
~~_ . o r S24 ~~
n c
::~,i 3
=; === - ~ - T r~
~:_
y `~` ~ Z
ii Z ~ Z
Z
Z ~ ~~
Pr'1 C
C/1 r'r9
O Z
n rC
frontage road
- __ _ _ ~.~~ __- =V s _- - --~
t \\ C~
~~ I `~ / f I ^~ J
e i ~; ~
~\ ~ A `\
\~ ~I
` ~~ S Sty r_ ,
{ ~~ / ~ .
r, ~~
/ -` a ah„
+~:. _r
,~ ~ % ;~
e • .., \~ %
,_\~-~
i
W
Q
W
J
0
77th
V~~V [,~~/-\(,~ VVIYI IYII..~~~vIAI
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE
® MULTIPLE FAh11LY
~~~~~~~>> CHURCH.
1611 ' '
~- -~
~~
~' 152 .m
O ' ; U
r ~- ~ Q
- -- -~4~ 3
-~- i ~ . ~ o
~~ _-~ gt3~4 ~ ~
.N I ' 2~ _ _- U
' (J
-, - -,
~~ls
_ ~~~~
~; I _~
I ~' 7
^-=
n ~ ~~•
w -- 9I8 _~
r ~
St^
- ~;
.ore ,
- ~
'~ r-,
O ,~
N
W"O
z~ -
RESIDENTIAL ~ ~~_--_ -
1---
- - 76th St.
~~
.~
a
(.~
N
W
` N
J
Ifpa O
~LUIVIIVh MH~
GENERAL COMMERCIAL- ~~
~}
- ,-„
-_____
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE
Imo- 16~~ ~ ~^
~
i O , ~ ~~~2 ~-~ ~I
i
I i U
-~
r
~~- ~ 7
='- -~4'3 ~ P
~._ ___:.C~}-1-Q
I
,
~ ,
~ 1
~
3'4~ ~ i N
_ Q
~~^ _~_
,
`~2i5 0 'u
~l I N
'- ~
_
7'
L _~
~ -
Q ^
i
_ I
~ ,
tO'9 200E
O
N Q
~~ `~ 1
W " ^ -~.
z ~,
76th S t.
77th St. -
CITY OF RICHFIELD, P~IINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 275
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council P•lembers
Subject: Request for Variance, 7001 Harriet Avenue
South (Independent School District 280)
The city has received an application for a variance which
would allow the construction of a scoreboard with advertising at
the Richfield High School Athletic field. A public hearing has been
scheduled, and the required notices were published for the regular
council meeting on August 10, 1981.
The Planning Commission had scheduled a public hearing on
the request for the variance at their July 28, 1981 regular
meeting. However, no representative from the school district
attended the Planning Commission meeting on behalf of the request
for the variance, and the Commission deferred action on this
matter until their regular scheduled meeting on August 25, 1981.
Therefore, it is recommended that the city council continue
the hearing on this application until the regular council meeting
on September 14, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ ~~~ ~.
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
~' ~ ~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 274
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Civic Plaza Sculpture
On March 24, 1975, the city council adopted a resolution
establishing a bicentennial committee, consisting of local business
people and residents Their goal was to select an appropriately
designed sculpture and to raise funds to help provide for its
purchase and placement in the civic plaza, located at the northeast
corner of 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue. Initially, the committee
sought to provide a sculpture to commemorate the bicentennial.
Subsequently, because of lack of funds and the .passage of time, the
committee decided to seek an alternative sculpture. In the fall
of 1978, the committee received a proposal for a three-figure,
stainless steel sculpture, symbolizing the family, from Mr. Norman
Holen. Mr. Holen is a Richfield resident who has been nationally
and internationally recognized for his works of art, particularly
sculpture. The committee has selected Mr. Holen's sculpture
"The Family" for the civic plaza.
The total estimated cost of the sculpture is $25,448. To date,
the committee has received appriximately $10,100 through fund
raisers and donations made by business people and residents (note
the list of contributors, Attachment A). The committee also
sought funding through the National Endowment for the Arts and
the State Arts Board. However, grant requests far exceeded the
funds available, and Richfield's applications were not funded.
Because the committee has raised 40°s of the monies needed, and
because inflation is causing costs to increase, it is proposed
that the City of Richfield provide the additional monies needed
to complete the project by October 31, 1981. A transitory ordinance
appropriating monies for this project is on the August 10, 1981 city
council agenda for second reading consideration.
Attached to this letter are several documents which require
action. Mr. Felton Jenkins, Committee Chairperson and A1r. Ralph
Bruins, Fund Raising Chairperson, will be in attendance at the
council meeting on Monday evening. They will present to the
mayor a check for approximately $10,100. The resolution marked
Attachment B should be adopted, accepting this donation.
Attachment C is a resolution whereby the city council authorizes
the mayor and city manager to enter into agreements with certain
Council Letter No. 274 -2-
August 10, 1981
contractors to provide for the construction and placement of the
sculpture on the plaza:
1. Norman Holen, the sculptor, will receive $7,345 for
designing and supervising fabricating (see Attachment D);
2. Joseph T. Ryerson and Son, Inc. will provide stainless
steel cut into appropriate pieces for $6,373 (see
Attachment E);
3• Stanley Iron Works, Inc., the fabricator, will assemble,
weld, grind and polish the steel and place it on the
plaza base for $9,550 (see Attachment F);
4. Linden Electric, Inc., has submitted a proposal for
approximately $900 to wire the four light fixtures which
will be mounted into the base of the sculpture. Also
` included is a photo cell and time clock to control the
lights and an additional feed in the electrical panel
near the site. He will also supply four light fixtures,
at whole sale cost of $320 per unit. The 70 watt high
pressure sodium bulbs are energy efficient and have a
long life. This work does not require a contract and
payment would be made with a purchase order when the
work is completed and accepted by the staff.
It is recommended that the city council take the following
action:
1. Adopt the resolution accepting the donation from the
committee;
2. Adopt the resolution authorizing the mayor and city manager
to execute contracts with Mr. Holen, Joseph T. Ryerson and
Son, Inc., and Stanely Iron Works, Inc. and authorizing
payment to Linden Electric upon completion of their work.
The total cost of the sculpture is approximately $25,448.
RespectfuClclyrsubmitted,
1J
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator
Community Services Director
Administrative Services Director
Finance Coordinator
t~i.i:cLC.::iiril,lli, ty
_ CIVIC ~1ARliER COA'[NIITTEE OF RICHFIELD
Savings Account # 167072
INCO'~iF.
Richfield Lions Club
League of 1Vomen Voters
Rotary Club of Richfield
Land O'Lal:es
Carlyle Johnson C Robert 1<iahon
Exchange Club
Richfield Jaycees
K 91art
Woodale Baptist Church
Richfield Education Assn.
Richfield Swim Club
Glen Winger
George Anderson
Richard Hughes
Richard Best
Lyndale Olds
Richfield Garden Club
Carl Retz
~tc~.nesota Valley tiVomens Club
General A1ills
Rotary Club of Richfield
Lyndale Hardware
St. Richards Parish
Minnesota Federal
Summit Banl: of Richfield
Richfield Banl: C Trust
Wayne Johnson
Susan ~larcottc
Dr. James Indrehus
Duraps, Inc.-Itichficld Townhomes
*Fishing Contest
*Softball
*tiub Rides G Dunlc 7'anl:
*Pastor Jones
*Richfield Baml: G Trust
*Gopher Studio
'°Richfi.eld Bank ~ Trust
*Richfield Chamber of Commerce
*American Legion X135
*Richfield Chamber of Commerce
*Hub ?Merchants 1: City ftal7.
*Cash from [3utton Sa1cs
*Funds Raised Crom Fnrnily ACf~ir Dad-
Interest Earned
As of~ .1ur~u:~t: :~,
TOT,1L In Lost ,:;11^:cci
1 J~0 3''5.:'8
~7 ti ri ..i :'
~ j ~~ ~ ~~.~ ~~~ . 1
,,
10,099.82
t - ~t
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF THE MONIES COLLECTED
FOR THE CIVIC PLAZA SCULPTURE
WHEREAS, on March 24, 1975, the Richfield City Council
adopted a resolution no. 5343, establishing a Bi-centennial
committee consisting of local businessmen and residents of the
community; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the committee was to select an
appropriately designed sculpture for the public plaza area at
66th Street and Lyndale Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the committee selected a Civic Plaza Sculpture
symbolizing the family, designed by a local sculptor, Norman
Holen; and
WHEREAS, the committee has obtained approximately $10,100
toward the total cost of the project which is approximately
$25,448 (herein called Project CP 769); and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 465.04, to accept donations; and
WHEREAS, the City is prepared to support the Project CP 769
by providing funds in the approximate amount of $15,348.
NOW TF~EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD, MITINESOTA, as follows
1) That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to accept the check in the amount of $10,100.
,_~,,
...~
.~~_
! `r
Page 2
2) That the check will be deposited in the Civic Plaza
Sculpture fund account Project CP 769.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
~~~.~uiai:ui.il~
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RICHFIELD AND CONTRACTORS FOR
COMPLETION OF THE CIVIC PLAZA SCULPTURE
WHEREAS, on March 24, 1975, .the Richfield City Council
adopted resolution no. 5343, establishing a Bi-centennial committee
consisting of local businessmen and residents of the community; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the committee was to select an
appropriately designed sculpture for the public plaza area at 66th
Street and Lyndale Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the committee selected the Sculptor, Norman D. Nolen,
a resident of Richfield, who proposed a three figure sculpture
symbolizing "The Family"; and
WHEREAS, Norman D. Nolen has been nationally and internationally
recognized for his works of art since 1970; and
WHEREAS, the sculpture symbolizing "The Family" represents the
individual family units which are the strength of the Richfield
community; and
WHEREAS, the Sculpture also represents a visual public
statement about our community; and
WHEREAS, the committee organized fund raisers and received
donations for the project, totalling approximately $10,100; and .
WHEREAS, the total cost of purchasing and installing sculpture
(herein after referred to as Project CP 769) is $25,448; and
WHEREAS, the City is prepared to support Project CP 769 by
providing funds in the approximate amount of $15;348.
~iLt:dU:ilit~LiC. ~ LUi' L
r
Page 2
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA as follows:
That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into the following contracts:
1) The City of Richfield and Norman D. Holen, the Sculptor,
residing at 7332 12th Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota in the
amount of $7,345.
2) The City of Richfield and Stanley Iron Works, .Inc., the
Febricator, located at 101 West 79th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota,
in the amount of $9,550.
3) Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. located at 1605 North County
Road 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota, in. the amount of $6,373.
Payment will be made in conformance with the agreements.
Linden Electric, Inc. is authorized to proceed with their
work and upon completion and acceptance by the City, payment not
to exceed $2,180 will be made.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
10th day of August 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
Karl Nollen erger, Clty Manager
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. ~3ergh, City Clerk
t=itLaL.imC:.n C li
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day
of 1981, by and between the City of Richfield
(herein called City), and Norman D. Holen, residing at 7332 12th
Ave. So., Richfield, Minnesota (herein called Sculptor).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on March 24, 1975, the Richfield City Council adopted
resolution no. 5343, establishing a Bi-centennial committee consisting
of local businessmen and residents of the community; and
WHEREAS, the objective of the committee was to select an
` appropriately designed sculpture-for the public plaza area at 66th
Street and Lyndale Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the committee selected the Sculptor, a resident of
Richfield, who proposed a three figure sculpture symbolizing "The
Family"; and
WHEREAS, the Sculptor has been nationally recognized for his
works of art since 1970; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the City staff to
negotiate and contract with the Sculptor.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
1) The Sculptor has provided a drawing of the original
concept to the city;
2) The Sculptor will provide to the City a scale model of
the Sculpture suitable for use by the fabricating contractor who
will be selected by the City;
3) The Sculptor will assist the City in the inspection of the
steel, which is delivered to the fabricator by the supplier. The
Sculptor agrees to make the inspection within 5 days from the date
the steel is delivered to fabricate;
4) The Sculptor will render assistance as necessary concerning
the welding, grinding and polishing to be undertaken by the fabricator;
5) The Sculptor will be present and render necessary assistance
at the public plaza during the installation of the sculpture;
6) As full and complete compensation in the work to be
performed by the Sculptor under this agreement, the City will pay
$7,345 to the Sculptor when the sculpture has been properly
installed on the public plaza;
Page 2
7) That. subject to unavoidable delays all work specified
in the Agreement be completed by October 31, 1981. Unavoidable
delays mean ..delays which are the direct result of strikes, fire,
war, material shortage, causes beyond the contractor's control or
other casualty to the improvements, or the act of any federal,
state or local government unit except those acts of the City of
Richfield authorized or contemplated by this Agreement entered
into by and between the Sculptor and the City.
8) Non-Discrimination. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 181.59, which relate to civil rights and non-discrimination,
shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set
forth herein.
Dated:
Dated:
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager
NORMAPI D. HOLEN
t~ ~. t c 1 C:; I1Iil ~' i"1 L L
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day
of 1981, by and between the City of Richfield,
Minnesota (herein called City), and Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
located at 1605 North County Road 18, Minneapolis, Minnesota (herein
called Supplier).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City has commissioned a sculpture for installation
on the public plaza at 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue; and
WHEREAS, Joseph T. Ryerson and Son, Inc.. is the stainless
steel supplier for the selected fabricator, Stanley Iron Works, Inc.;
and
WHEREAS, the Supplier is experienced in stainless steel plasma
cutting.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
1) The Supplier will plasma .cut Z" thick 304 alloy stainless
steel the shapes and pieces per drawings attached hereto as Exhibit
A;
2) The Supplier will provide these additional materials to
the fabricator:
a) 40 feet - 2" x 6" Type 304 Stainless Plate Flats;
b) 40 feet - 4" x 4" x 3/8" A-36 Angle 2 20' lengths;
3) The Supplier will provide the shipping and handling to
Stanley Iron Works, Inc. at 101 West 79th Street, Bloomington and
notify the City of the date of delivery;
4) The Supplier is liable for all the materials ordered by
Stanley Iron Works according to-the plans, until the delivery is
received by Stanley Iron Works and the order has been inspected and
found acceptable by the City; .
5) The City will make payment when the materials have been
delivered to the fabricator as ordered and inspected and found
acceptable by the City;
6) Payment for all the goods and services will be in the
amount of $6,373;
c11.. Cclla lli:C 11 l.L i:, i, l.il! _.
Page 2
7~ That subject to unavoidable delays all work specified
in the Agreement be completed by August 31, 1981. Unavoidable
delays mean delays which are the direct result of strikes, fire,
war, material shortage, causes beyond the contractor's control or
other casualty to the improvements, or the act of any federal,
state or local government unit except those acts of the City of
Richfield authorized or contemplated by this Agreement entered
into by and between the Supplier and the City.
8) Non-discrimination. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 181.59, which relate to civil rights and non-discrimination,
shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set
` forth herein.
Dated: CITY OF RICHFIELD
Dated:
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Manager
JOSEPH T. RYERSON & SONS, INC.
f
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day
of 1981, by and between the City of Richfield,
Minnesota (herein called City), and Stanley Iron Works, Inc.,
located at 101 West 79th Street, Bloomington, Minnesota (herein
called Fabricator).
WITNESSETH:
64HEREAS, the City has commissioned a sculpture by Norman D.
Holen (herein after called Sculptor)- for installation on the public
plaza at 66th and Lyndale Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the sculpture consists of four elements 14'6" high
of z" thick stainless steel; and
WHEREAS, the City is desirous of obtaining the services of
a company believed. to have the necessary experience to fabricate
the elements of the sculpture.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED:
1) The Fabricator agrees to accept delivery of the various
cut pieces of z" thick. 304 .alloy stainless steel as proposal dated
July 10;
2) The Fabricator will not initiate assembly of the sculpture
until the City has examined and approved the pieces provided by the
supplier;
3) The Fabricator will join together all the pieces by
welding according to plans based on the Sculptor's concept which
plans are presently in the possession of Fabricator:
4) The Fabricator will provide a sub frame to strengthen
the base of the sculpture which will be fitted as needed to anchor
bolts in place at the public plaza; ~
5) The Fabricator will construct light wells for the light
fixtures in accordance with plans to be submitted to the Fabricator;
6) The Fabricator will grind and polish all exposed surfaces
of the sculpture;
7) The Fabricator will transport the fabricated sculpture.
to the public plaza;
8) The Fabricator will install the sculpture onto the
concrete foundation;
c.~'t.ai;illi~t~tlC _ L,UI7 ~ L
i
Page 2
9) The Fabricator will provide a Comprehensive General
Liability Certificate indicating evidence of independent contractors
coverage with limits of:
$100,000 per person bodily injury
$300,000 per accident bodily injury
$ 50,000 property damage liability;
10) The Fabricator will provide a certificate of a $10,000
Contractor's Performance Bond;
11) The City will pay $9,550 to the Fabricator when the
sculpture has been successfully installed on the concrete foundation
at the public plaza and has been inspected and approved by the City;
and
12) That subject to unavoidable delays all work specified
in the agreement be completed by October 31, 1981. Unavoidable
delays mean delays which are the direct result of strikes, fire,
war, material shortage, causes beyond the contractor's control or
other casualty to theiinpro~ments, or the act of any federal,
state or local government unit except those acts of the City
authorized or contemplated by this Agreement between the Fabricator
and the City; and
13) Non-Discrimination. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 181.59, which relate to civil rights and non-discrimination,
shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set
forth herein.
Dated: CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
::~
Its Mayor
By f
Its City Manager
Dated: STANLEY IRON 4dORKS, INC.
i
CITY OF tciC:riFIELD, 'MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No.273
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Award of Contract - Ice Arena Improvements
On July 28, 1981, bids were opened for ice arena improvements.
A representative of the city manager, the city clerk, the community
services director, the ice arena manager, the consultant, and others
were present at the bid opening. A copy of the bid minutes and
tabulation is attached for city council review.
The engineering consultant for this project, which includes
repair of the outside laminated wood beams, is Orr-Schelen-Maeron
and Associates, Inc. P~Ir. Gerald S. Corrick of OSM reviewed the
bid proposals. It was the opinion of the consultant that the
apparent low bidder, Johnson Engineering, Inc., is very capable of
doing the physical work of removing the beams and capping.
However, this company does not have experience in the treatment
of decay, although they have done a great deal of research connected
with wood treatment. Johnson Engineering, Inc. has contacted an
entomologist, Jaclc O'Pei7_ly, to do the treating. According to the
city's consultant, Mr. G'F.eilly does not have any actual experience
in r~etermininq amounts of chemicals needed to stop existing decay
and preventing further decay. In summary, OSM consultant Gerald
Corrick feels there could be a possible risk in the decay prevention
portion of the work if Johnson Engineering, Inc. were to be
awarded the contract.
The second low bidder is Osmose Wood Preserving Company of
American, Inc. Their bid is $360 higher than the apparent low
bidder. This firm has years of experience in projects similar
to the one proposed here as well as a good background and knowledge
in timber decay. The third bidder submitting a proposal had a
bid substantially higher than the other two bidders.
It is the recommendation of the staff and the consultant that
the city council award the contract for laminated wood beam repair
at the Richfield Ice Arena to Osmose Wood Preservation Company of
American, Inc., in the amount of $28,200. There is money appropriated
in the 1981 capital improvement budget for this project. Funds
of approximately $32,000 remain for this contract and consulting
work.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
ec: Community Services Director
City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Bid Opening
July 27, 1981
Ice Arena Beam Repair
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative
Staff was called by Sylvia K.Bergh, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose
of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for Ice Arena Beam Repair,
as advertised in the official newspaper on July 1, 8, 15 and 22, 1981.
Present; Joyce Wilde, Administrative Services Director
Don Fondrick, Community Services Director
Al Payne, Ice Arena Manager
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
BIDDER AND BID SECURITY TOTAL BID
Johnson Engineering
B. B. 5% $27,840
Orvedahl Construction, Inc.
B. B. 5% 39,200
Osmose Wood Preserving Co.
$1,410 Cashier's Checlc 28,200
The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the
regular city council meeting of August 10, 1981.
Sylvia IC. Bergh City Clerk
~,
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 272
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members: -
Subject: Request for Variance, 6314 Newton Avenue
South
PROPOSAL
Mr. Terry DeGidio has submitted an application for a variance
to reduce the minimum lot width of 50 feet to 45 feet, and the
minimum lot area from 8,000 square feet to 5,760 square feet.
Mr. DeGidio is requestion the variance to allow the relocation
of a single family house onto his property, located at 6314
Newton Avenue South. The property is zoned "R" single family
residential. Mr. DeGidio previously owned a single family
house on this site. The house was destroyed by fire in 1979.
The property has remained vacant with the exception of a garage.
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 3.30, subdivision 4 of the zoning ordinance lists
lot area, frontage and yard requrements for lots in the "R"
district, and establishes the 8,000 square feet minimum lot
area requirement. Section 3.39, subdivision 4, states that in
any district no lot shall be less than 50 feet in width. Section
3.40, subdivision 6, lists three conditions that must be met in
order for a variance to be granted.
STAFF REVIEW
The staff has reviewed the proposal against the three con-
ditions for granting variances and found the following:
1. This lot was platted and recorded as a 40 foot lbt.
The property was used for a single family residence for
many years. Therefore the staff feels that there are
special conditions affecting this property not common
to properties in this or similar districts.
2. Denial of this application will preclude reasonable use
of this property. The property cannot be used as a
single family residential lot unless the variances are
granted.
Council Letter No. 272 -2- August 10, 1981
3. The granting of this application should not be detrimental
to the public welfare. This site has previously been used
as residential property. There are other lots in the
neighborhood of equivalent size with dwellings on them.
The dwelling would meet all setback requirements. There-
fore this proposal would be in character with the
surrounding neighborhood.
STAFF RECODIMENDATION
Because the three conditions for granting variances have been
met, the staff recommends approval of this application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECONIf4ENDATION "
The Planning Commission recommends approval of this variance
request.
Respectfully submitted,
~~ ~ , ~ ,~G
~'
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
~,
/1 Y~
C.-- G:' RIC:._ IC~'~, Ric'.:~iclc? r.,_n.^.esota
_ D•, •, '_ ~To.. o~ . ,:` c t•, .- - _nc~ Di' Dion
~~ ` 'li '~~ ~ 3uliC
' ..J ~ . ~.
G700 Poi tlar.;: ~wenue South '
(G1?} 8u9-75?1
t--
(_i a c'.:c::ce in son~r.g
(~"~ recuest nor variance
s~• .
Special lise
CJ AparrMent Use
O:a::er/: ppiica:
i
~' /~rLf 1 r=~ , Citv~!;? •~ ,~~ ~ ~i _B•.:s. P~r,;;e
Fcr t:-:e pr;,per'-~~ or Y~d locwtec at. ' •y
.~ti.= eSS .
Plat
P~: cel
Cl.'J~' `: 1510T1
1 O C':
T~~ S
Ce:'.erdl Cil.;~e.1S.7.C."_S C:. ~ ~O~ert~~ (~~~.aCieC all n°_C°SSai~' ~=3:•rl:'iCS, i^.~^S}
E:.istir.g use o~ lance ~(!~ ~ "~-
E:._S _in7 ZC.^.i:1C ._~ ~ L ~/ ~r`~l/L `T"~ d /~
E::isti:,g bui ldi: cs? ~' Yes C r~o ~/1-/h,d L"'~
ngeS In L' °~." T i~ fem.( rJ:~/-~_,CL r/~1 ~"'r~Jl,r~- )/~e ~yr> ~ ~ ^ / ,7
~C„ ,~ / .~
PrcposeC c::a^c~~
s i n ..~ ,
_ ; g : ~ o /i ~. ~ O ~/~ _
iii , - '~"~'
~ ~ v /~ ~
~;~ ~ r~ ~ 1,~ ,•. r-,
,~
. . • . ~ .. ' : alley ~: ~. . ', ,~ '.:~ ' .
- - 74
Present
.Garage
N
O -
22' 9"
~:
6
~ t: •t
i ~.::::::::~::::'~'~':':':':':'::::::::~:::~:~::'ti
~ -•:•:•:•:•:•:•:~oyse:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::dt
c• •y
r:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:~:•:•:•:•:•:•:}
49'
6314 Newton
Richfield, Mn.
51'9"
Scale: 1"~ 20'
REQUEST FOR VARIr1NCE OF ( ~ /.-~ ~~~Ll/~~iA~~
" FOR PURPOSE OF L r`
- ~, ti.
Legal Description: ~' ~ ~~~~ ~i~C--- iu'r~~7lJ ~ ~~C ~ ~~ ~ ~.C ~J
Tip"-E ~ c v ,~' ~' ~ h ! L ~= ~u a o F /~~ G ~ .~e ,c~ 2 ~.~ ~h, ~ c LFi G F U;G
We, the undersigned, being owners of immediate adjoining land as above described,
do hereby concur with the variance as requested.
Signature of Qwners _ Address Leal Description
~~({ . _
'' ! ~ _ ~ ~ ~i~ ~yl, ~
~~ ~.~ : ~ r
f
~
U d
~/ ~-
.~- ~ ~ Yr ~.i~ .~.~~~j 't ~
`.~ i
• I
J
I
- --
_- - - --~
` I
----
-~- - ~
-- -1 ---- ---
- ------ - -
I
--------- -- - ------- -- --- 1
- i
-- - ----~--- ----- ---- --i
~ i
i
r- I 1
-~ - (-.J
s ;:-~1~
1
azs~
L.~
PETITION
24 1 :,'ti E
~} ~ 23 2 __.
-' ' 22 3
~ I-.~ 21 ~4 i~ .o
u 20 ;5
~1 1
?. '
.. Y, r4 i
-
~
4
t
6 `~
i7
i
r ~--
,~o_ „
~ ~
i
--
o°o°o°o°o
MAP ~o~a~o~o~
°o
°o
o °
ng _ 24
~ ~---
~ 23 i2 l-~=~
~---- -
~' ~ ~2 (i 3 i
- --- ^ i
r, ! C ~ ~ i -8 1 00 0°0°0°0°0°0 - _ '--'- _ `~ _ 9 ! i 6 .~Q' ~ 19 ~ S
?~ l_1 ~~ ~ Z O z I ~o°o°o o°o o° ! 8 I 7 r r ! a - 7 ~ I ~~ ~ 7
-~ o000oc __J~ ~ ~ _~Y =
000000 ^ ?y.~
Z7 ~7 a -- -i - ! 7 ~ ,°\o°o°o°o°o°oQ i T - ~ 24 .~ !.! _
W ~ ~-- -- ~ 2 ~~ o 0 0 0 0 o_c ~ ~sl~.Jf Z 17 `'t~ _ ~] i 7 8_ _'Y ~.1.~ ~, - 1 T - --
~ -, !
> 3 16~ 9 ? I6 ~ JzE ~ I6 9 ~ze ~ ..? 16' 9 -_ ~ r ~ J Ib !9
Q 1~ ISi,II Q ~Se Q ,r--~ ~IIU ~ Q u !5 10 --t- ~ ~5'r!0 ~ a ~'
141,11 14 {----__' 14 -IJ---~ ut_.
1 N - '~---- --- tc iy~ 14 r+1- 1'
t~ _.'3 12 S~--t-_13 i12 ..u 13-" ~12 _~ _U 13~'!2 ~T ,~rE--13 2
c a.-.
a~~ 3 2 3 ~ 2 ~ s - ~- - -~ 4
a~ I
~. -• ~,~.5 i CJ H ~ 3 ~2
' F =~ •-
.~~~y
` 1 I V
__ ~_- !
Z "- -- ,l w
z T1 ~
~ ~~ --~ J
lr ~
- - ~ 1
5 ~ I I'~
~J
_ _ 1
b NS ~ _~
--
'-gaa
~ ( a .,
O I
2~
j ~ ~
-_- i
y ~ . _
-_
--
= .
.
IR!3 ..
'-
~~ ~
(J
17 ~4 .
a
- -- '
,~ i ~
1 6 5 ~-
15 5 ,
~,-• 14
13 9
• ).. 1 ~
•~
- I: 0 !
_-~
'~-
2~2
- -- 3' 3
_
i ~~~
O - ---
5 y ~ ~~~~
U
~,i~
g ,
~{ L;
,~ r i
}~}-~ 6 6 i_
_ _ '~J- ., -
-
z a ~ _
ca
7i7
a
~
i
-- - ~
~~ ;
,
i~ , Q
...
' ,i __
,iy
'I IQ :a
II
r Z
- 1 _...
~JQ3_
-
p
/
4
:
.r
-__'.
^' ~ .
5
+
-J - =1
°; `~ ~ ~
s _~~
c_j 9
• 63rd s-z.
^15 - _' - T --~ i --J L __~
-~ 22; ;3 '-! `P 22. ~3 ~ 22' 3
_.~ ku _ ~ ~ t .-0 O. -
_21 ~ 3 21 I4 -~ - -~~ F4-
- ~- _ - - -
O
w
Z
J '..~
rl-- i
=J __. - ~ _ -.
19 2 ` ''
~
J
-
- --
- -
_
IR i3
-' 17 ~ 4 r-
i l a
~ ' I ` a r
~~ _ ~ ~_
I ~ 15 6 ,
;. 14 7
'` 13 d ,
.2 ~ -
I I ( ~~ ti
7
a
-~soi- - -- -J _ -- -- ._ _ __ - -~~
~- -9 ~ -
64th St,
- - -I9~i i =. ~J I9 i2
--. - --Y _- - - -
17 ;4 - _
i
z - ---~ - -
~ll 17 i4
~J
_
165
;- .
d - -` -
~ ~ ;-t.: s
- -~ ~ .J 4
. --~ - Q 1
,_; 15 E
~ 14 7 ~ v ~,a~p
'
~
~~
.J ,L. 1 y
J
•. ~ 13 8 ~ -
~ .3 3
'
i~ 9 -
12 ~~
ti !C r _ I I
65th Sta
'- - ~ f -~ -- ~ 1' •2
~~~~ Lots 50' wide or less •
PENN AVE.
a
_ OLIVER AVE.
l 'l_._.. ~" w I._ ~ ° 09 ~ .0401 ° , ° tifj •.~:•;. ••~
`~ W A i U i Qf i V m~ cJ V W +.;L.y.; •a ~. ~ V •_tit. tp
~ 1 i i I N ~ :•~{: ~ :-eitivf: yi ~
NEWTON AVE. ~~,
N ~'{~ ~ V m ,p f ~ W d ati;::•?: LJl Ol ;::•: W: (D 1 ~
m • 0 1 ~ ° +~ •:~
MORGAN AVE.
.•-~ I~ I~ '~ ~ [~ 1 ~ ~ I I~ 1. ~. ~ I ~" 1 I IIJ ~~~
I -' \~ I 4J
i I tD f `t ~ A W d I Ut I U' V 'tDt tD •..
m V - Qf ; ~' ~ 0 I W N -+ - (' , -y T ~ ~ ,. '~.k1 ~ ~_- ~ l .'r.A
~ 1 I ~ N ~ v
v. L .. ~ i tit ni i t.~ I.n~-•. ~t ,: ,~ l utj .t .. ,~ ---
OGAN AVE.
;k , , _,_
.v
r----l
~~
N!-
~~
~~~. ~i
.~ J,
i '~ ;
_ ~, ' ,
.,
~ -
,_- I'
~~
~~', ~ i}
~ i
p~ tD i m I V A to ~ `~ A i
__ ,~
s
N ~^~ V ~
I~ ; n w
~_
J
i ~ _~Ir ili 1 (.~~,i= ,~~ ~ ..~I 1 r' i `_.1~ i, ~ii .~ [ `~+~:::•>~ ~b It
;~ 't 1 - ~ • _ ~ -
tr is ~n ~ <p ~ •~ w w ' t,+ I !~ : ut , n r a•:vi•: n
i I` ~ )
.,
r ..t Y. L y ~Y:~ .
NOX A ;/ E. '. t~
I 1 I i.
, _ 1
'1 ~ ~ W O~~ V W ' to n t w rt.. tr A ,s r: ., ~ n, ,..
_ I t t ;~
•~ i ~ \~
- _ 77 I
~ •~~'
p I tD :D . J QI ~` UI! ~ Y
O •O i ~' J _ :11~U !'yyA ' i~
`
_1
_ .
y e
ro
"1
~,
-~ ~
* j
1
~
V i co ~ . ~
~~
ro~ y ~ N i. ~y
r
~--i ~
n ~
i
m ~ ,r
~.
c
:r
'
.!~ E~Nfi' Y ~
i i~~,~o
• :, . 1
.. ,~ ,•, i
n~ ~ l'n
- .~
•,--~---s..
'
^V
, `
l \
)
c~.d.. R/ ~n.c c.G ~° .c.~,pu E fE- ~ ~ ~c-S E ~ ti 2 c ~ ~ £~
.~o ~ /~- l`- ~' ~ / `r` itlC' w ~o .cr c~a - /r~l~G S ~o ~--//
`t 3 ~u rv !~ 4 G~,~ ( ~JG G /-~cc,5 E ~ TZ ~~Cs ~ G- fi~ita c~ ..
G d z 7~ ~ nl l Q' 7 Q - ~ A Nt ~ ~- o ~ o sip ~/
b l`co v E ~.~ E'.//~~~e. E c c-~P 1~~-y ~O~c 2 G~ ~t-s ~y
Cci /1~ic.L f' }~ 6 w j`! ~ / Z.. ~ ~,,[~~L S ('i /~ L .Q /l.e 7`'"
~- ~,~ ~ ~.,,~ may,
j. SSG ~li,~ ,~ c lac, cu,~-t s~~•~t~ cis .
/1,[ 5 /~ c /- ! 5 /(!D CCU S /sx ALL ~ /Z ~~ .~ ti/ ~/OG~+
~t <. ~,a 1ov E ~b ~bn ~4 RCS/~or~'.v '~!k G ,~~ T/. .C~ c,
~ ~ /) ~ C e, b G e 1/ y o ~2..o / .c~ .4 ~u e •E. S /~ Lv ~4- S
~T/~ C ~// o r~r~-E ~ ~ /~~ i 5 p it o la ~ /~c ~y u. ft s
,ti u 2 C. /~ /y- S E ~ ki! 7~-1j ~ ~ E ,,[~'jv ~ E s~ ~! oN
w ~ s ,d c- s ~ n o ~ a h y ,n f~i %e E ~"' ~~t ~~
y
z f ~d ~Y ~ ~ a ~ E ~ ~~ .¢ u,~ R E 5~~ 6 >L~C~-~-~
!~ S ,Z o~ t G i~ .~ ~ .~~ 2 tic ~Ek b •E.o i
c • ~ ~.
3. ~o . ,o c ~.Q ~ ,~ ;~,~~~.
,~.D~,;~ ~ ~ ~ ous E 6~ ~~ ,~,~~-S ,~~o~ E~ ~y
l,~i « ,uo ~ E~~Ec~ ~~ E S~ ~E rY a ~ 6~E~tL;f/
o ~ ~// ~, y .o~E . .~~ ~~~~, . ,~ ~a~sE ~~~
tic. ~ t EZ ~ q- L < Y ~' .c.t. ~ o u E ~ .~- ~,~
~- si.p E S of l~ y /+' 2'/0 ~.e ~~ ~I ~ u~ E''V ~/~tc -
/n /Z ° ~o ~ /5 'F ~ ~[ o ~a O f. ~.. ~1 O c~6' E l O ~c /~s
~ ito E l G .~ /u' o.2S .
%~ ~~ ~ .L j~ ^ ,
T~
... ..-~-r....-. _ ... ... .. _ ..
..
y
. :. ~ M
fir- -.. .i-,.,_:~.. ~-"-;T...~ _.. r. y.... - _ ~ - _ _'
sV _ A
cair,;: yn
u~~
_~~~~-- -_ ::= n G~ - _ _ -- -- ---
---
. ... V' ~ r _ ----
. _ _ _-
~~ ~,z
---
___ _- .
w - _.. ~ - --- - _- -
~.Ct_JR - - ~ - 1~~ ~~ Gt . _ .. _ - -
'.
__
;_ _ -
r {, .'
i.X.
..A 4 '"
r -'. ____ __-
._ - - t ~ ~~~_...
._ ._ . ~ `'
..
y ~.
~. . ,. ...._ ,L
~ ~~ ~ ~-
1 ~~
.~~~ q~J /~ ~ J~-~/f
~.„ f
~ r ~~~
A(ll/1 ~ ~/ ~ / 4~1i~ ~ ~ /' iii (//!. JI -''.'~'"c~ 1
- _-'..ro.W: - ~ .,.-mow ._._ .-- r - -- -._ _ ~_ ~~/L/ ll..,, ~ v `--c A~, - i ~ l ~ it i~
.~ ~ i
3~~ " ..` ~ tom' ~ ,
< ~ K
l•
~~~'.'
~~ ~y , Y' -
-i~ ~~1 -LH~.____-~_.vr~.. ~~... ____..________ _.____ _.___.._
._
~,~:.
- ~~ - -
-Q~-- i~2-- ~ _ - *-- - -- 7
---- --- - ~ n ---
? 0-C ---
- ---
• --- - -
•_
- - -
Walter C. Hoppenrath
6319 Newton Ave. So. - -
- - -- - --
Richfield, MN 55423 __ - _ '
- -
$~ / /
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 271
Agenda August 10, 1981
Deferred August 24, 1981
The Honorable DZayor
and ~~ ~' ~~ ~ - S~..n,m ~~~ o Q.P..o- , r~ ,~
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield ~, - f n :a ~ ~,,~ ,.~ ~-~- r~~_~~-~~~~ •
Council Members:
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit and Wine
License for 2312 West 66th Street
c~
~' PROPOSAL
r
~~ Mike Stenson, representing Pontillo's Restaurant, has
submitted~an application for a special use permit to allow the
on-sale of wine at t'r.:e restaurant, located at 2312 West 66th Street.
In 1978, the city council granted the applicant a special use
•permit for a restaurant and a license permitting the sale of 3.2
beer on the property. The 2,074 square foot restaurant has 64 seat
and six employees on a maximum shift. The restaurant is not
proposing to expand the seating capacity or the number of
employees. The sale of wine is the only change proposed at
this time.
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 3.33, subdivision 4, paragraph e of the zoning
ordinance lists regulations relating to restaurants if liquor
is to be sold on the premises. Section 3.41, subdivision 5,
lists conditions governing the issuance of special use permits.
It must be found that the use will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, or welfare of
the public before a special use permit can be issued.
HISTORY
In August, •1978, Pontillo's was granted a special use permit
for a restaurant and a license for permitting the sale of 3.2
beer at 2312 West 66th Street. At that time the city council
stipulated that the special use permit be issued only for a
restaurant offering the on-sale of non-intoxicating malt
liquors. This stipulation ensured that the applicant would
have to obtain a new special use permit if they wished to sell
intoxicating beverages at some future date. The liquor license
ordinances have subsequently been amended to allow for on-sale
of wine at restaurants. The applicant therefore must obtain a
new special use permit and a wine license before they can offer
wine at the restaurant.
Council Letter No. 271 -2-
August 10, 1981
The staff has been contacted by a neighboring resident
expressing opposition to this application due to loitering and
noise from patrons and employees from the front and rear of
the building. The staff has reviewed the Public Safety Depart-
ment records and found only one complaint filed. The records
indicate that the problem was abated, and that there have
been no special on-going public nuisance or other problems
with this particular restaurant.
STAFF REVIEW
The staff has reviewed this request and found the following:
1. That no construction or structural changes are proposed.
2. That there are no changes contemplated in the use of the
site.
3. That the proposal meets the conditions governing the
issuance of special use permits in that the proposal
should not adversely affect the welfare of the public.
4. That the proposal meets the requirements for restaurants
serving liquor.
5. That the restaurant is located in a shopping center, and
meets the off-street parking requirements.
6. That the property is zoned "C-2" General Commercial.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends that the special use permit be granted.
PLANNING RECOMMENDATION
7~he Planning Commission recommends approval of this special
use permit application.
APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE WINE LICENSE
~1'he Public Safety Department has conducted the required back-
ground investigation of the application for an on-sale wine
license, and the council has previously scheduled the public
hearing on that wine license application for August 10, 1981.
It is recommended that the council hold that public hearing at
the conclusion of the hearing on the special use permit.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
Public Safety Director
ni+-~i ('lark
r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 271
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable riayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit and Wine
License for 2312 West 66th Street
PROPOSAL
M~~~
Mike Stenson, representing Pontillo's Restaurant, has
submitted an application for a special use permit to allow the
on-sale of wine at the restaurant, located at 2312 West 66th Street.
In 1978, the city council granted the applicant a special use
permit for a restaurant .and a license permitting the sale of 3.2
beer on the property. The 2,074 square foot restaurant has 64 seats
and six employees on a maximum shift. The restaurant is not
proposing to expand the seating capacity or the number of
employees. The sale of wine is the only change proposed at
this time.
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 3.33, subdivision 4, paragraph e of the zoning
ordinance lists regulations relating to restaurants if liquor
is to be sold on the premises. Section 3.41, subdivision 5,
lists conditions governing the issuance of special use permits.
It must be found that the use will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, or welfare of
the public before a special use permit can be issued.
HISTORY
In August, 1978, Pontillo's was granted a special use permit
for a restaurant and a license for permitting the sale of 3.2
beer at 2312 [hest 66th Street.. At that time the city council
stipulated that the special use permit be issued only for a
restaurant offering the on-sale of non-intoxicating malt
liquors. This stipulation ensured that the applicant would
have to obtain a new special use permit if they wished to sell
intoxicating beverages at some future date. The liquor license
ordinances have subsequently been amended to allow for on-sale
of wine at restaurants. The applicant therefore must obtain a
new special use permit and a wine license before they can offer
wine at the restaurant.
C~;~uncil Letter No. 271 -2- August 10, 1981
The staff has been contacted by a neighboring resident
expressing opposition to this application due to loitering and
noise from patrons and employees from the front and rear of
the building. The staff has reviewed the Public Safety Depart-
ment records and found only one complaint filed. The records
indicate that the problem was abated, and that there have
been no special on-going public nuisance or other problems
with this particular restaurant.
STAFF REVIEW
The staff has reviewed this request and found the following:
1. That no construction or structural changes are proposed.
2. That there are no changes contemplated in the use of the
site.
3. That the proposal meets the conditions governing the
issuance of special use permits in that the proposal
should not adversely affect the welfare of the public.
4. That the proposal meets the requirements for restaurants
serving liquor.
5. That the restaurant is located in a shopping center, and
meets the off-street parking requirements.
6. That the property is zoned "C-2" General Commercial.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends that the special use permit be granted.
PLANNING RECOP•1MENDATION
Z~he Planning Commission recommends approval of this special
use permit application. ,
APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE WINE LICENSE
~1'he Public Safety Department has conducted the required back-
ground investigation of the application for an on-sale wine
license, and the council has previously scheduled the public
hearing on that wine license application for August 10, 1981.
It is recommended that the council hold that public hearing at
the conclusion of the hearing on the special use permit.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City I~tanager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
Public Safety Director
.~
C,'~Y O~ F~IC:.;'_T~;,D, Rich_`ield, t.:i:~neso}a
D~~part:~c~t o~ .'::i~lic ~•: - Buil
~rr.s ding Di •ision
6700 Portly^d ;venue South
(G12) Sub-7521
:1~?L~C:._~0:: IS Fi~~~.3Y ~:~D ~O?:.
*--
(~I A c^u::ce in zor:ing 0 Special L'se
(~la request for variance ~ Apartment Use
s~• _ ~~6N i 1l-L~~S ~~ ZZGl21 ~ S ~~C ~ _
-7 ~ j Owner/ pclicar:
- - ~~:.~ I ~` ~ ~ ~ ~ 't''~ ~•~ ~ add r e s s
'. Bss . P,~one
Fcr t!:e prcperty or land located at:
ess L,3 ~ ~ vV, ~ ~~ ~~ Plat Psrcel
Su';ai~:ision:
Bloc::
Lot
Ce:'.eT_"'al di..,enszcns Oi L.rl:~er ~~' (~ =~~-C;Pd all neceSSdr'V d=3~•I1n~S, IR~DS)
E::isti:.g use o land: '~CT~(~ S~f~L~.
E::_sting zo:~inc: ~' ~j ~ ~itCcX ~~ ,,t,~,1~~~
E:._st; ^.g buildi : cs? ~ Y1es ~ r;o . .
Proposed c za ng e s i n use : I~1 P(~LI C.fl'T"1 C~l~.~ ~~'lZ (,-yll~,~ L ~t,~
Pre~osed c :.:aces in zo:3i^a
Varia::ce re~ues:..d:
rtta., ~1' ~~.,~ - - - -
~ -, ~~ / -
Aoolica^ts Si ut 7 / iy?L==/~ ~, ~ L~l ~
Fc~_!__,! _ F.ccc:,c~ 'ccci~. - {~ Dz:c S2q ~j
'~
~\
\ J
J
W
N
'~ N
~ ~
\`\
I -
~ °'~
~2
- ~. ;
~ j
J ~t
_ -- Q3
O
i
J
~
~_: ~ c
'~4 ~
RR
J ~ , ~ d <<,
'
~
~ ~ ,(~
Y
Vi ~_
7
_
~ ~.+ ~ -
~.
~9
i ..
L y _
~ ~ ~
~~ s
-.,< <, ~.
~.
f
~~ l:
'n
`. e ~ i ~ ~, _.u
^
~ ~_
_' ~ ~ 2
_ ,~
~ ~ i ~ .
,4 ~
J
(~ ~
!
n ~
66th
! ! 5 4 1
! L_.: __
1 f 5 .~ 1 ___.-_--~
,.' ~i _
1 l ~ yl
~b
~~ _~. ~ ,. 1 ~..
r.. ~ ~ ~
_~ -t - - . -
2J 2v ~ 1
-~~~ ~ ~ -
1 ~'
.~G Iw.
I ~ t
:~-- ~. i ~
S T,
_~
i
FI'^~ ._
z` ,
_ ~`~
->,l -
i.k ..
~`~ 5 sa
J - ~ `l E
- - - - -----~--- J ^~
i -.
___
r l
L ~- --
~_9 ~
~ ~~
_ 9 _,
t`4„ t
~_ -~ ~
i
._ _~ J
1 n 4~5 (,_ (
'
°- - - 2~ I 1 LJ
---- w.~ 'J ~ 1
~~ ~ _ -
- -~ 13 { 2
- _.-_-
_~-- -__
- J
- _- ~
- _.-i- -
o; ~Ea3 ~- ~ J `3
~.ait+-~
J ~._
17 i4 _ _
O __
~j _
t l 4
- '~ S '
] --~
~1 ~ ~ I
~
`
0 ' 6
i5 f_, ~ 15 5
--~- ~ _ .
;~ ! -,
-' ~ ~~ , i
_
,;r ~ 13 i8 ^ :
-J ~~ 13 ;8
.y~_
' Ic i9 ,i 12 8
_ _.
ay i _ t i s ^
.,
1 I ! ID
i
~_ ~
'..~
~ 1 IC
~ ~--! ~ - z-t~ ,--
~.a
J 1' ,' ~
-~, ---~ + 3 - -~
-- ,5 +4 --'.J
c' - ..,.a
~ _ J
._.i ---_..~.-_-.e--
z ' I (_-? .
-~
J.
^~ ~ ; ~ y
- { -~.
i ! I v y .y
.-
~,~ .._.
c`Y?~! ,C
~s ~: ,
.. •6 _
. ^L.- ~ F {{{~...
- -~- ,a ~:
-,_ -
y1
. . ,~_~
r ~~
w _
7 ~ i0 1 ~ ~ ~ ffl~ I ~ tET~
a i ~ .. , ~ ~ - ~ -
.- 4
~ ' ~ ~ I~
9.2 - i ~ 9.2
Z~ ~
W vi ~ ~ a
d ~ -- - iJ ~
,~ ~ ~. ~~
~~
_.
~ _.
I i -,
-- -- f
- - (
i
1
J0~ 'J ,~ i ~ - -~ _
~~ ~~ ~ .I i
~ ~ --
(
~ ~
~ I
-.
~ - • ,
_ _~ 7
i ~- i
i
~~ ~
- _~ `
, i
~ ~,
II
~ ~ ~,
ii f + ~ .' .. 7+~1
~~
Cif. {
~:t;~ ~P~~hf;~ld
\ ,. ~.
~~~c
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNEOSTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 270
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Additions to Alley Paving Project, CP734
Three petitions have been received, requesting that the
following alleys be included in the 1981 Alley Paving Project:
Between From To
Queen and Russell Avenue 68th 69th
Stevens and 2nd Avenue 72nd 73rd
1st and Stevens Avenue 72nd 73rd
Under the terms of the bid, it is possible to add a
maximum of three alleys to this project with a change order.
The contractor has indicated that he would be willing to do
these alleys. In order to include these alleys with this
year's project, the staff recommends that the city council pass
the attached resolutions, ordering the preliminary report,
receiving the preliminary report and calling for a public
hearing on August 24, 1981.
Residents have also asked that the council consider dropping
the alley maintenance assessment incurred this year if these
alleys are paved.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Engineer
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECEIVING PRELININARY REPORT_AND CALLING
PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ADDITION TO CITY PROJECT 734
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. A preliminary report on the proposed addition to City
Project 734 of the city dated the 10th day of August, 1981, pre-
pared by the city engineer, is hereby deceived and ordered to be
placed on file.
2. A public hearing on said proposed improvement is hereby
called to be held on August 24, 1981, commencing at 7:00 o'clock
P.M., in the council chambers in the-City Hall of the City of
Richfield, 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give
published and mailed notice of such hearing in the manner required
by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
10th day of August, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Cler
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PROPOSED
ADDITION TO CITY PROJECT 734
BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rich-
field, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council finds it necessary and desirable that the
city make the assessable public improvement of permanent surfacing
of the following alleys in the City of Richfield.
Alley Between
From
72nd St
72nd St
68th St
To
73rd St
73rd St
69th St
Stevens and 2nd Avenue
1st and Stevens Avenue
Queen and Russell Avenue
2. A preliminary engineering report on such proposed assess-
able public improvement is required by law in the event that said
improvement or any part thereof is specially assessed against the
benefited property within the city. ,The city engineer is, therefore,
authorized and directed to prepare a preliminary report of such
proposed improvement and to submit the same to the City Council at
the earliest convenient time.
3. Such report shall indicate the estimated cost of such
proposed improvement, shall indicate whether such proposed improve-
ment is feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed
or in connection with some other improvement.
4. Such proposed improvement shall hereafter be known and
designated as City Project 734.
Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield ,this
10th day of August, 1981.
ATTEST:
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
.~ 1
i
~; _~
r~,/
~~ ~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 269
Agenda August 10, 1981
Subject: Request for Off-street Parking Permit,
Corporate Travel Office Development,
1400 West 76th Street
On May 12, 1980, the city council approved a height variance
and an off-street parking permit for a proposed six-story office
building at 1400 West 76th Street. Four stipulations were
attached to the council's approval: two-way access road should
be provided to 78th Street, a stop light should be installed
at the 76th Street entrance to the site, off-street parking
spaces for 365 cars should be provided on the site, and
appropriate signage should be installed in the parking area to
encourage usage of the 78th Street exit. The council later
amended the stipulations to allow the developer to provide 327
parking spaces, rather than 365, provided that the developer
provide the city with a five-year performance bond in an amount
sufficient to construct 38 additional off-street parking spaces if
the additional spaces are deemed necessary by the city. The
council also set the developer's contribution towards the traffic
signal installation on 76th Street at $50,000. Finally, the
council approved a preliminary resolution concerning the issuance
of approximately $7,500,000 of Industrial Development Revenue
bonds to finance the project.
The developer has subsequently come to an agreement with Mrs.
Lyons, the adjacent property owner, to acquire an easement
allowing two-way access to 78th Street, and has revised the
building and parking design because of poor soils discovered
on the south portion of the site. The changes include the following:
~ ~
~ ,.1~ ~_, I i~
' .~~'~
N
~n J
1. The building will be five stories high rather than six.
2. The gross square floor area of the building will be
reduced from 72,856 square feet to 59,200 square feet.
3. The parking area south of the building will be one story
rather than two.
4. There will be a two-level parking area north of the building.
5. There will be parking provided for 239 cars rather than 365.
N
Council Letter No. 2v9 -2- August 10, 1931
6. The access road on the eastern edge of the site will now
be partially on the Lyons property rather than totally
on the Corporate Travel site.
The staff has reviewed the proposed revised off-street parking
layout and found the following:
1. The proposal would generate less traffic than the project
previously approved by the council, because of the lower
square footage in the building.
2. The proposal would meet city ordinance requirements for
off-street parking, with the exception of driving aisle
width and the number of parking spaces provided.
Minimum driving aisle widths are. 22 feet, which is less
than the required 24 feet. 22-foot wide driving aisles
are consistent with the previous proposal and with other
development projects recently undertaken in the city.
With the trend toward smaller cars, this dimension should
not pose any problems. The applicant has indicated that
there will be 239 off-street parking stalls provided.
This is 57 spaces short of the 296 spaces required, while
the previously approved proposal was 33 spaces short of
city requirements. As indicated earlier, the previous
parking deficiency was to be handled through a five-year
performance bond arrangement. The council could handle
the current deficiency in a similar manner. However,
the provision of the additional parking if it is necessary
at a future date would be expensive because a parking
structure would be necessary. A survey of other suburban
communities' parking requirements for office uses indicated
that Richfield's standard of five spaces for each 1,000
gross square feet of floor area is consistent with other
communities in the area. The Institute of Traffic
Engineers, however, recommends a minimum standard of 3.3
spaces per 1,000 gross square feet.
3. The Engineering Division has indicated that the site
grading and number of catch basins shown on the plans
should be sufficient. Some adjustment of catch basic
locations may be necessary, however.
4. In accordance with the city's sidewalk policy, a sidewalk
should be constructed along 76th Street adjacent to the
Corporate Travel site. No sidewalk is included in this
proposal.
5. The State has indicated that a traffic signal would not
be warranted at the 76th Street entrance of the site.
It is the opinion of the staff that once this development
is constructed and occupied, the warrants for a traffic
signal may be met. However, the applicant should still
provide the city with a $50,000 contribution toward the cost
of installing this traffic signal.
Council Letter No. 269 -3- August 10, 1931
6. The entrance to the site from 76th Street has been shifted
slightly to the east. The final design and location of
this entrance may need to be adjusted to line up with the
entrance to the freeway on the north side of 76th Street.
It is recommended-that the city council approve the off-street
parking layout with the following stipulations:
1. That the City Engineer approve final catch basin locations
and the final design of the entrance to the site from
76th Street.
2. That the applicant contribute $50,000 towards the cost
~ of installing a signal at the 76th Stl-eet entrance to the
site.
3. That a five-foot sidewalk be provided along 76th Street
adjacent to the site.
4. That the applicant provide the city with a five-year
performance bond in an amount sufficient to construct
57 additional off-street parking spaces to city standards
if they are deemed necessary by the city.
It is recommended that the council adopt the attached
resolution, approving this off-street parking plan with the
described stipulations.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
City Engineer
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR
OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION
NO. 81-4, CONTRACT NO. 2334
Erickson and Sons, Inc.
46 E. 4th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Location: 1400 West 76th Street
Use: New Office Parking Area
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the proposed geometric layout of the off-street
parking as contained in Off-Street Parking Application No. 81-4,
Contract No. 2334 is hereby approved subject to and upon completion
o~ performance of the contract for such off-street parking as
hereinafter authorized.
2. That the proposed off-street parking contract for the
improvement of said off-street parking, bearing Contract No. 2334
be placed on file and that the manager be authorized to sign said
contract and the clerk be authorized to seal the same for and on
behalf of this city.
3. That the off-street parking operator provide the City of
Richfield with Surety in the form of cash, passbook saving withdrawal
authority, or performance bond in an amount to be determined by
the community development director and city manager, to ensure the
off-street parking lot is constructed within the terms and regula-
tions of the Off-Street Agreement with the following stipulations:
a. That the City Engineer approve final catch basin
location and the final design of the entrance to the site
from 76th Street.
b. That the applicant contribute $50,000 towards the
cost of installing a signal at the 76th Street entrance to the
site.
c. That a five foot sidewalk be provided along 76th
Street adjacent to the site.
d. That the applicant provide the city with a five
year performance bond in an amount sufficient to construct
57 additional off street parking spaces to city standards
if they are deemed necessary by the city.
4. That responsibility for the proper upkeep and maintenance
of said Off-Street Parking lot shall remain the responsibility of
the off-street parking lot operator in accordance with Ordinance
Code 4.05.
Adopted by the city council of. the City of Richfield this
10th day of August, 1981.
ATTEST Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
_.. _ - - __ - - =4 ~--
R W
ti ~ '~.b O
- ~ ~ ~ C7
_ 1 0~ r Y
3 ~ N ~
~' ~ ,
Y I
~ • '
• ~ ^., ~.
1
~ ~ ~
1
..5.. . !' ~..~ .; .ia .a1
r~~ ~__ 1
t - .N
' ~'
~ ~~i
.r
- .i^
.~
~a+/ }P~
~ ~ //X~ F 71~a+
/ J~l~
•
/~
/~
~/
~~/
~..
r'P
i
~P
~W
J
~?
a
I~
a
i
r
~ i~
K
I
d .I •1
s=
~::i~
~~~
~~~~~
S
~~ta
Z \I
a ~~
a
Hg
N~
s
s~ oa
9~
U~
W
d3
oa
~~
4
N
O W
4
as
J
a°
~~
O=
Vs
~~
~~•
S~
7
~~
4
i ~
~
~ .\
` s
~
~
~
':'tr r T(" ST I16T ` 1~ 'lt::ll
,..... ~/ i i / ~ t
~
,''ii~l/~ _ - __j
r _r
r __`~ _-
\`,, \.
~
~ --- ', 1,
'
~
..,... ~
1~ r.u
,,~
J ;
II
II
~ ~ ~ ~!
I I i
• ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ,
II I I
I' I I \
~1
\ 11` _
Z ~~
I . G
i~
1~ -*'
f i
l I
I i
I , i ~ \
I X ~
t
~1 I I ~
` _ ,
1 ~
11 I I o
~~ ~
1
I 'r•
~
'
.
,1 I I 1
~
l i l ~ i 1 . ` `\
; I '
I~ II
1
',
.II 1 1 '
~~~~ I; -
;;i ~ 1 ~ ;
,I~ , ~ ~
III 1
III 1 I I
l
II 1
.
I I ~
1
~ I 1
, ,
I
`
1
I
I~
1 I I
\
, I t
1 'I
s ~'
~ 1
. .
1
1 I I
I ' I
1
t , II
l I I
; I
~
I i
I . ;
I
'
' ~
~ II
'
i ~ I I ~i5
•
~
O
I i
I It
11
, - ~
; • I
• I
;
•,, I I ,
I i
I ~
W ~' ~
,, ~ , ~ II
£
(
,
~
, ;~
~ i 1
1
nl I t s
f
l ~ v ~
1
I~ ~ l I
i ~
i ~
1 i
I ; i
11 I
11\1',1
I,I
,
11
~ ~
~ I
~I I, 1
li
`
,
1,
1
,
,
`'
I
I
I I
1
1
1 1`
,
~
~ ~ j
~ .~. ~
, I
1
`\
~~~\ 1 I
~ ~ 1
~
.. I
. 11 I
jl
~ 1
I II 1
~
~
~ - 1
~
`
~ I
~
~ al
Y
~ 1
1 t
1
. ~
~
~ ' . c
•
~ / 1 a
0
s s ~ ~ 8 ~ 3 x ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
'~ ~
n t
n ~
N ~
n ~
N ¢
~ ~ ~
~ ~
S ~
~
~~
~~i
~ `zz`ppII
~ll ;
~~
r~'
Ia~~
~
~~ S($ww
F~
~~
~~
St~~
-
~
~~~
~~ _~
~
~~
L Z~ ~C y~ ~~ ~~ ~{~~ ~~ i~1 ~2~ ~~
J ~J ~ Ix ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
~ u r a c S ~ 4 ~ `~ A ;
~~ ~.
,,
- 1'
~~~~~~~~.~ $ ~I
1
f
.. ~~ ,
J
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 268
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable r?ayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Vacation of Alley on Block 5, New Ford Town
At the July 13, 1981 city council meeting the council received
a petition requesting the vacation of the alley bounded by 21st
and 22nd Avenues South, and East 65th and 66th Streets. The
council set August 10, 1981 as the public hearing date and gave,
first reading approval to an ordinance to carry out the alley
vacation. A copy of the July 13, 1981 staff report on this
matter is attached for your information.
It is recommended that the city council conduct the public
hearing and. then give second reading approval to the attached
transitory ordinance approving this alley vacation. /~/ 1 ~ ,~\^,~
). lJ
Respectfully submitted, n„ _ „ ., ,. v ~~, ~,,,9 ~, !'
~ ~~~~
J
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
xr~y
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Y.
y
Council Letter No. 228
Agenda July 13, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject:
Vacation of Alley on Block 5, New
Ford Town
Attached is a petition recently received by the staff,
requesting the vacation of the alley on Block 5, New Ford Town.
The alley is bound by 21st and 22nd Avenues South, and East
65th and 66th Streets. The petition is~of proper form and
has the required number of signatures to initiate the street
vacation process.
r
pRnpncnr. .~
,,., Julian and Darlene Halvorsen have circulated a petition
to vacate the alley on Block 5, New Ford Town Addition. The
petitioners are requesting the alley be vacated so that it can
be used as private property. In most instances, when an
alley has been vacated by the city, one half of the alley
right-of-way is returned to each abutting property owner.
STAFF FINDINGS
The staff reviewed the request and found that:
,~-.
1. A storm sewer lies within the alley right-of-way.
2. An overhead power line owned by Northern States Power
Company is located in the alley.
3. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company owns lines located
in the alley right-of-way.
4. The west one-half of. the alley is unimproved and not
used for property access.
5. The east one-half of the alley is used as a driveway,
providing access to property located at 65;6 22nd
Avenue South.
6. The center_ of the alley rigt;'~-oi.-way is a low spot in
the area, anc? r_u;~~isti ha:~ cellected in this lolr-lying
area.
Council Letter No. 228 -2- July 13, 1981
(.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
It is the opinion of the staff that the proposal to
vacate serves the public interest in that the city maintenance
costs will be reduced because the city will no longer have
to maintain the alley. The vacation should not result in
adverse traffic conditions on surrounding streets. Therefore
the staff recommends that the city council approve the
vacation of the alley on Block 5 in New Ford Town, with the
following stipulation:
1. That utility easements be granted to the utility
companies and the city in order to maintain the
utilities located on the' alley.
The action necessary at the July 13, 1981 city council
.meeting will be to adopt the attached resolution acknowledging
receipt of the petition and setting a public hearing on this
alley vacation for August 10, 1981. It is also recommended that
the council give first reading approval to the attached
transitory ordinance.
PLANNING COMMISSION $ECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the city council
approve the vacation with stipulation recommended by staff.
~.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
Community Services Director
City Engineer
City Clerk
_. . -6 3rd - - --- -- - -- --- - ---- - S T-- .---- -
~ `~ 3 22
----~
4_.21
^ ~~ 5 zo --
^?
w ^;
a'~
~ _.
D `~
6 4th
^ e' 1 ! 24 ^x
D °~ 2~ D':
D o9 3.22 [~.•
^ ~ 4?21 Da
~
^ <' -~' 1
g ---^zo
~^ < s
~~, 7 18 ^''
7
8
, .
.
^ s~ 9 ff7--
n 1(~ l4 ^! o
^:,00 1213 ^•+
5th
^ o. I '23 ^''
^G9 321
^ 1~
~ 4 20
~ ~
-
~
J •
I ~H
^ .~ 6 ~ 18
^ iS T 17 t 4
4] *° 8 16 - zy
{
^>> 915
i I w O
~ 1912 •"
P~~'1~'~~~ ~~~
_- .,
`J 1- ~ (-1
^~ C' 10 IS ~ '" '-^
... n
^'~~ 1 24 !
^ °S 2 23 ^' `
^G9 322 ^98
~~ - 4'21 ^`'
5 20
^~S C--
D~~ 0
~„
~
nzs 7
'" 18 z
h ~
---- ~--
--^" 1015 ^sh
^ •~ 12 13
Signatures on Petition.
^J5 2423
}a^ 4121 ^'z
1 ^ 5' 20 ---
ZI^ 1 -
6[19
r--~
7118
F` 8'17
9 ~16
10;15
- 1 i 114
^+s 12 13 --^~•
-- - - - 322 -
42i
- ,
.~
_ ~~- - w
^Z.
~8-- --- ~
- s -C? - Q
la'15
^ l I ~ 14 ^~o f
i -1
l2 !13 ^4ej
S T.
^ ~ 2 12 3 ^04
4 (21 ^"
.T ^ 5420 ^ ~~
~~^ ~ ' Q
--~~-1-~-
- -
1
I_'
U. a _
~-
_.. ^29
9 s
i
--
>> ~ 9 ~ 16 a s_
S~^ 10;15 ^~~
.. ~. !{ !!M ~ ~~1, {
S T.
y- -
i : 24
2123
°'
---- 3:22
-- ~ ---- - ---1
4121
i
5120
~~ `
2"•^ j
~ lt<_
,0 8 - 7
33^- 9116 3'
>>^ 101';
^ 11'14
U l ~L~
-~. _
05~ 212 --
09 ^ 3 `:2?
D I3 G;2,_-_ -
^ ~, 5i2J
_--_6-:19- ----
.__t" -
C 8 ` i 7 ,.~ -
9 ;16
^ ~ ' ~ 115 --- - -
_ ~ ..-
L:: .
iI i!4 •
_ _~-.-_
i
^~~ iL;l'! ~~ as
c~o~ ~~ ! 23 t.`.#o0 1 ^ 1423 ^ '~ 1 ~ 23 ,~} ~^-~ ! 23-- -
2 22 ~-Os _ . _ -~-r22 ~-, ^ CS 2 ~22 rl-jJ'1 OSI J 2 22 _--~
-~?_ 3 2 I J ~e - _- - 3121 ^~:w ^ -'~ .~ ~'-I ^; e `~~-- ~--I-
~-
O -~) ti.lrj~, 2-r U1 f~ It3 =~;.~ N 4 J, V It3----- ~ t--- - t -tl
__~-
r~1-- l3 16 ^` - - - t311b ~-~',I -~ •16---- 4 0., a.15 ._ .
--- -- --. _ i :...~.. --- - - ---_ ~ i -- -
R-• f-_•-• '-~-•-
1~ 11 }L -, i~ i },J ji~i 1 t_~J_ ,f - iJ 11 -I~ IJ ~'~1 I~~ -~~~ I~'_- ~ '•s
i
.. _ ~ 2 J s.a.. ... ( .. 1 ~ I .- e
c~ 3'22
~:3 X21
.J'~ 5 2~ ^
3 : 2 2 `~~
4 ; 21 ^__iz
5 2G
L--T-~--- - -
~ ~ _, ~
S ^:4 ~ ^ •'• 7 ~
8,1'7 ^~~ Q ^ .9 8 I
916 ~ -J" 916
~ 1015 ^72 ^3' 10 i5
II '14 ^+' ^` II t4
1213 C" ^" !2 13
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
A TRANSITORY ORDINANCE PROVIDING
FOR THE VACATION OF THE ALLEY
ON BLOCK 5, NEW FORD TOWN
Section 1. The following alley on Block 5, New Ford Town
within the City of Richfield, County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota, is hereby vacated:
"The Alley on Block 5, New Ford Town"
Section 2. This vacation shall be subject to perpetual
easements running in favor of the City of Richfield, its
successor and assigns, and Northern States Power Company and
Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, .to permit improvements or
maintenance of said utilities.
Section 3. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to
take such action as is required to give effect to the vacation
of the public right-of-way as provided in the foregoing
section 1.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, this 10th day of August, 1981.
Donald J. Priebe, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 267
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield ~, ~
`;
Council Members:
Subject: Request for Special Use Permit for
7640 Cedar Avenue South
PR(~POSAT,
Mr. John Prest, representing Heidi's Stuberl, a restaurant
located at The Inn, 7640 Cedar Avenue South, has submitted an
application for a special use permit which will allow the
on-sale of wine. The property is zoned "C-2" general commercial.
HISTORY
Two apartment buildings were constructed at this address in
1963. On January 12, 1976, the city council approved a special
use permit which allowed the conversion of the two apartment
buildings to a hotel. Then, in August, 1980, the city council
approved an amendment to the special use permit which permitted con-
struction of a 12 guest room and 76 seat restaurant addition.
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 3.33, subdivision 4, paragraph e of the zoning
ordinance lists regulations which apply to restaurants serving
liquor. Section 3.41, subdivision 5, requires that it be found
that the use not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
comfort, convenience, or welfare of the public...before a special
use permit can be issued.
STAFF FINDINGS
The staff has reviewed the request for special use permit
and found the following:
1. That the pvoposal meets the requirements set forth in
the regulations relating to restaurants serving liquor,
in that the property abuts a main thoroughfare of the
city and that the applicant has received city council
approval of an off-street parking layout in 1980. The
applicant has nearly completed the off-street parking
area, although he has not requested an inspection or
release of the off-street parkinq bond.
Council Letter No. 267 -2- August 10, 1981
2. That no construction is contemplated at this time. The
existing restaurant will not contain a bar or lounge, and
wine will be served with meals.
3. That the proposed sale of wine should not adversely affect
the health, safety, morale or comfort of the public.
Therefore, the proposal is in substantial compliance with
conditions governing the issuance of special use permits.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION RE: SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Because the proposal meets all requirements set forth in the
zoning ordinance, including the conditions governing the issuance
of special use permits, the staff recommends approval of this
application for the on-sale of wine.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of this special
use permit.
APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE WINE LICENSE
The Public Safety Department has conducted the required
back ground investigation of the application for an on-sale wine
license. If the city council approves the special use permit
allowing the on-sale of wine, it is recommended that the council
set the date for a public hearing on the on-sale wine license
application for August 24, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
f ,.
/ ,~a
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Community Development Director
City Planner
Public Safety Director
City Clerk
0
p rest
~~u~pr~ent cc.
MATERIAL HANDLING SALES CENTER
2500 NORTH FERNBROOK LANE PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 Telephone:612-559-3233
July 2, 1981
CITY OF RICHFIELD .
Attn: Mr. Tom MacGibbon
City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
We built a German style restaurant in the new addition we added at
The Inn/Ai.rport. Our dinner business has suffered for the lack of
a beer-and wine license. We get a great many request for beer and
wine with the German cuisine we are serving.
We feel that our restaurant is a great addition to the Richfield
community. Unfortunately, we are unable to attract enough dinner
business to make the business profitable even with extensive
advertising; T.V., newspaper and radio. Our-breakfast and lunch
customers have informed us they would return for dinner if we had
a beer and wine license.
We would appreciate your favorable consideration. Thank you.
Yours very truly,
~~ --~ ~`,
a
~+
\.`cihn M. Prest
JMP/cd
;.;:_ ;
,. ~.-.
r''' LIFT TRUCKS ~ NAND TRUCKS • REACH TRUCKS ~ SKIDS • PALLETS ~ SHELVING i CONVEYORS • RACKS ~ DOCK BOARDS
~s;
•SEALS ~ COVERS ~ SHELTERS ~ STACKERS i BATTERIES ~ CHARGERS
~~
_,
1 J _o ~ 0 ~, 6~ / 8
1 ~~ ~ ~
I
W
nn ~ p
J 2p W o
c Z may:. ( ~ //~~~~}Z~~~\'•~
~I F- ~ N ~ J `F~
^~ <.>
~~ Q 4< W'W
~~Iil~i~~ ~~lill II
;~ ° _ '~ ,~
'~b ._..1 it ~ f 1 Q
'~ ~T !,:..- s qty li ~'~:j K
s> ~ it ~ ~ i Q
\+ .1
~ p 3 ~ ~ { ~ ~: ' ~^ Lit"a W
rF (~~f .
~ .~,F- ~ ~
ay \\~, ~~. /.
1~aaas „cc Lsr~
/i;
;~~
_ I ..._ .... /~ ~je
\ ~.:
/ / 4
F1 • ~
(~ f 4
~p ~ - ~
J
1 ~ F( ( ~ i
/ice 7 J
/' ~ ~
i ~~
J-
Wv
~~ o
}
,nJ 1
Wge t
Kon ~~
~1 Z
~2
cc~F r,
LI
MI
F
2 , r.
ToL u
d~'~~
W 7.~p
7
S v
v ~
!/~
0
w ,,i
~~
~'~
W-
~~
1 1
a', ~_
~ ~1
II ~ T
`~ Q J
3
~~
_ i
r ~
I
i t
i
i
~':
5°
i
I
Z
Oi
fI
e;
~!
d
t
e
I
Z
<~
tl
7
w ~ t_O
VI F
~~
I ~
I w
f
L!
I~ ~ ~
i
~. I. I is III
~(: ~
i..
II I
I i
~ ~~ I
oC~ .'
-~-
~.I ;I.
.x I
_~~ j..
~' ~~
i i '~ ~ I
~ I ' I ~i
I ~
n
z
o
WN ~
ZN W
t F
J_ ~
ova
~c~, c
W~v.
~n p
~7~ D
yl >
.W q
L~ ~ n
iI
~F
r r
Zoo W
I„ z r
~0~~ I
7~Ha y
0
il~ ~~
~O
~;' J
~,, it
I:
,,c
i ~~ ~:._
.' t
--~
._:.
i ~ ~ -- ~
~~ - ; I
~~
,i i
~!
~~ 7 N
1 =~
~~
~~
nn
fi ri Tl ~,J J
I~ (ul u~ !~ J 41
of
d ~
~-
n~
.`
~.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
August 11, 1980
The Richfield City Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority met
in joint session in the Council Chambers of the City Hall on August 11, 1980 at
7:00 p.m.
Rev. Dan Salter of the Richfield Evangelical Free Church gave the invocation.
City Manager Karl Nollenberger led in the pledge of allegiance.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Donald Priebe.
Present: Council members Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe;
HRA members Freeman, Harms, Helmberger
1. Minutes
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger to approve the minutes of the
July 28, 1980 city council meeting.
All ayes - Carried.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Freeman to approve the minutes of the
July 21, 1980 HRA meeting.
All ayes - Carried.
2. Discussion of Concept for Development of the Multifamily S~.te,,L/H/N
Redevelopment Project
City Manager Karl Nollenberger provided background plans for the development
of the multifamily site in the vicinity of Graham Avenue South of 66th Street in
the L/H/N redevelopment project area. He indicated that the Knutson Companies
are proposing to construct a multiunit housing project on this site of one and
two bedroom units which would be owned on a cooperative basis by people of 60
years of age and up. Mr. Nollenberger introduced the Development Director of
The Cooperative Living Centers of the Knutson Companies, Tom Vavoulis, to present
the plans of the development.
Joint Council/HRA Meeting -2- August 11, 19b0
Mr. Vavoulis talked .about the marketing of the project. He said the development
would be designed for elderly, that the unit would not be subsidized and the residents
of the co-op would be shareholders. Mr. Vavoulis distributed brochures describing
the proposed development.
Representatives of the~Knutson Companies were also present and responded to
questions from the council.
The following residents were present and expressed their interests and
concerns to the city council:
John. Hamilton, 7220 Harriet
Steve Kuklinski, 7220, Girard, representing Assumption
Church
John Ch ell, representing House of Prayer Lutheran
Church
Don Wegmiller, 7029 Bloomington
Dave Wilder, 7321 12th Avenue
Eloise Brandle, 7105 Portland
Helen Yates, 6737 1st Avenue
Gordon McKinnon, 7308 Upton, asked if tax abatements would be granted. The
city manager said the units would be taxed the same as a single family home.
John Kenealey, 6400 Blaisell, asked what fee increases are foreseen and
what would happen if an owner defaults.
Lawrence Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth, praised the city for providing this
meeting and asked for detailed financial information regarding the tax yid d and
assessed valuations when available.
Don Lynch, 6617 Lakeshore Drive, thanked the staff for a preview of the
project. He expressed the concern that the project will contribute to a decline
in real estate values of the abutting residential properties and stated he was
against the development.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Bunce to proceed with the project.
All ayes - Carried.
Joint Council/HRA Meeting -3- August 11, 1980
3. Discussion of Board and Commission Meeting Schedule
City Manager Karl Nollenberger, in response to council request, suggested
meetings with the various boards and commissions be set on the third Monday of
the month prior to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting. For convenience,
he asked if the Housing and Redevelopment Authority would be willing to move their
meeting time back to 7:30 p.m, to allow the city council to.meet with boards and
commissions at 6:00 p.m, for a dinner session, or at 6:30 p.m. for a nondinner
session.
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Bunce to set the time of these special meetings
with the commissions for 6:30 on the third Monday each month preceding the HRA
meeting.
All ayes - Carried.
Motion by Helmberger, seconded by Luettinger to amend the HRA bylaws by
setting the time of the monthly HRA meeting to begin at 7:30 p.m.
All ayes - Carried.
4. Establishment of Just Compensation and Authorization to Purchase Property in
the L/H/N Area
City Manager Karl Nollenberger advised the city council that the area
designated as the "Godfather Block" is being considered for redevelopment by the
HRA. The Phillips Petroleum property at 744 West 66th Street, now vacant, has
r
approached the HRA indicating their interest in selling the property. Just com-
pensation for this property has been appraised at $217,000 and to finance this
purchase, the HRA would borrow funds from the HRA's Tax Increment Fund for a
period of five years at five percent annual interest.
Lawrence Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth, asked which properties the HRA is
interested in. Bruce Palmborg, Housing and Redevelopment Specialist, responded
to his questions.
Joint Council/HRA Meeting -4- August 11, 190
Motion by Freeman, seconded by Luettinger that the following resolution be
adopted; that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of
these minutes:
HRA RESOLUTION N0. 144
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT
TO BORROW MONEY FROM THE L/H/N TAX INCREMENT SPECIAL
REVENUE FUND FOR THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY
(744 West 66th Street-Phillips)
Poll of votes: Ayes - Freeman, Harms, Helmberger, Ludeman, Luettinger. Nays -
None. Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 144 in Resolution Book No. 2.
5. Claims and Payroll (HRA)
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger that the following HRA claims
and payrolls be approved:
SUMMIT STATE BANK
Checks 3299/5504 $94,210.64
All ayes - Carried.
6. Adjournment of the Joint Meeting
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Harms that the joint city council/HRA
meeting adjourn.
All ayes - Carried. Time: 9:00 p.m.
Date Approved: _ _ }
V. L. Luettinger Secretary
Thomas E. Harms Chairman
- Council Meeting Minutes -5- August 11, 1980
Continuation of Regular City Council Meeting
7. Discussion of Airport Noise, Runway Expansion and West Passenger Terminal
Mayor Priebe introduced Jeff Hamiel, the technical advisor to the Metro-
politan Airports Sound Abatement Council, to speak to the city council.
Mr. Hamiel discussed the environmental effects the airport has and will have
in the future on the city of Richfield.
Messrs Nigel Finney, DiYector of Planning for the Metropolitan Airports
Commission, and Darrel Korpela, of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, also
addressed the council and responded to questions.
Councilman Luettinger said he feels that Minneapolis/St. Paul discriminate
against smaller suburbs like Richfield and Bloomington and that there is little
chance of reducing noise and traffic over our areas.
Gordon Anderson, 7501 Elliot Avenue, asked why the runway extension was
needed.
Bob and Geri Christensen, 6929 10th Avenue, both spoke in opposition to
airport expansion.
8. Opportunity for Members of the Audience to Address the City Council
Lawrence Wozniczka, 6744 Wentworth, suggested the city council consider taking
formal action to express opposition to extension of airport runways.
9. Request for Special Use Permit and Off-Street Parking Permit, 7640 Cedar Avenue
City Manager Karl Nollenberger reviewed the request of Mr. John M. Prest
for a special use permit and off-street parking permit to allow construction of a
76 seat restaurant and 12 additional guest rooms to an existing 94 guest room
hotel located at 7640 Cedar Avenue. He said that the proposal is in compliance with
the comprehensive plan, however, the parking lot would not meet the required number
of off-street parking spaces and would not meet the parking space dimension
requirements, therefore, the staff recommended denial of this application. ~e
Council Meeting Minutes -b- August 11, 19~~
Planning Commission recommended that this application for a special, use permit be
granted.
Mr. John Prest passed out brochures to council members explaining his
proposed site development and spoke on his own behalf. He said he will never
apply for a liquor or beer license. -~; ~~ ~.,,~' ~ w,,,T ~
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Collins to close the hearing.
All ayes - Carried.
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Bunce to approve the special use permit.
A11 ayes - Carried.
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Bunce that the following resolution be adopted;
that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of these minutes:
RESOLUTION N0. 6272
RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR
OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICATION N0. 80-b, CONTRACT N0. 2325
Name: John M. Prest
Address: 2500 Fernbrook Lane, Plymouth
Location: 7640 Cedar Avenue
Use: Hotel and Restaurant (The Inn)
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - None.
Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 6272 in Resolution Book No. 45.
1,0. Request for Special Use Permit, 6600 Portland Avenue
City Manager Karl Nollenberger reviewed the request of Mr. R. H. Johnson,
representing Sinclair Marketing, Inc., for a special use permit to convert storage
space at his gas station located at 6600 Portland Avenue to three offices, and the
removal of approximately 500 square feet of asphalt pavement to be replaced with
grass and a fence. The city manager noted that this service station is a nonconforming
use since the station was constructed in 1952, prior to the passing of a zoning
ordinance in 1970 which prohibits gasoline service stations being located on sites
which abut an "R" zoned district. The staff recommended approval of this request
Council Meeting Minutes -7- August 11, 1980
~-
inasmuch as it would be an improvement to the applicant's property with the
following stipulations as listed in Council Letter No. 277:
1. The northerly curb cut on Portland Avenue be closed.
2. The easterly curb cut on 66th Street be relocated
40 feet from the Portland Avenue and 66th Street
intersection, so as to comply with the city ordinance
regulating gasoline service stations.
Mr. Ray Johnson spoke on behalf of Sinclair and said they were opposed to
closing the two curb cuts.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Collins to close the hearing.
All ayes - Carried.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Bunce to grant the special use permit
without the stipulations regarding the curb cuts.
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - Ludeman. Carried.
Councilman Ludeman stated he voted "nay" since the safety factor of the curb
cuts was paramount.
11. Request for Variance, 7601 Aldrich Avenue
City Manager Karl Nollenberger presented the request of Dr. Jerome C. Ulrich
for a variance to reduce the required three foot fence setback from public right-
of-way to zero feet and to allow construction of a fence on city property. He
said that the proposed fence would not be detrimental to the public welfare,
however, inasmuch as the portion of the fence along 76th Street would be within
the public right-of-way, upon the council approval of the variance,the applicant
should complete an agreement that would hold the city harmless should any damage
occur to the fence
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Collins to close the hearing.
All ayes - Carried.
Council Meeting Minutes -8- August 11, 1930
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Collins to grant the variance to the three
foot setback and use of the city property, subject to the following stipulation
as listed in Council.Letter No. 276:
That a formal agreement be executed between the applicant. and the
city to allow the fence to be located on the public right-of-way.
The agreement should hold the city harmless for damages to the
fence, sidewalk or median improvements arising from snow removal.
It should also ensure that the fence and sidewalk be removed at no
expense to the city should future public improvements be planned
along 76th Street which would require use of the full right-of=way.
All ayes - Carried.
12. Appeal of Denial of Taxicab Drivers' Licenses
Hearings before the city council to appeal the denial of Richfield taxicab
drivers' licenses by the Director of Public Safety were scheduled on the basis of
requests by Charles R. Jackson of 2971 Center Road S.W., Prior Lake, and Roger T.
Williams of 12.425 Line Street, Burnsville. Mr. Jackson failed to appear, as scheduled,
to appeal the denial of his taxicab driver's license. Therefore, the denial stands.
Mr. Williams did appear at the council meeting and requested a continuance of
his appeal so that he might consult with his legal counsel regarding this matter.
The request was granted and the matter will be continued until the council meeting
scheduled for September 8, 1980.
13. Request for Rezoning and Off-Street Parking Permit, Richfield State Agency
City Manager Karl Nollenberger presented a rezoning ordinance which would
rezone Lot 2; Block 2, J. N. Hauser's Addition and Lots 6 - 9; Block 2 Lyndale
Shores on Wood Lake Addition from Residence (R) to General Commercial (C-2) for
city council second reading approval. He recommended that, if the council gives
second reading approval to this ordinance amendment, they should also execute an
off-street parking contract subject to the following stipulations as listed in
Council Letter No. 281:
Council Meeting Minutes -9-
August 11, 1980
1. A minimum 15 foot setback be maintained between the proposed
parking lot and the south property line along 67th Street.
Existing trees should remain in this setback area. A minimum
setback equal to the front setback of the house at 6616 Grand
Avenue should be maintained between the proposed parking lot
and the west property line along Grand Avenue (approximately
35 feet). All fences should be constructed outside these
setback areas.
2. A landscape plan be approved by the city staff.
3. The parking-lot improvements be allowed to be constructed in
phases, but that the applicant post a performance bond in an
amount sufficient to construct the improvements for the
development as a whole.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Bunce to close the hearing.
All ayes - Carried.
Bill 1980-16, "An Amendment to Appendix C of the Ordinance Code of the City
of Richfield, Minnesota" was read and reviewed by Clayton LeFevere, City Attorney,
the same being on file in the office of the city clerk. (C-9915)
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger that this constitute a second reading
of Bill 1980-16; that it be published in the official newspaper and that it be made
a part of tnese minutes.
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger that the following resolution be
adopted; that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of
these minutes:
RESOLUTION N0. 6279
RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT
FOR OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICATION N0. 80-7, CONTRACT N0. 2326
Richfield State Agency
6225 Lyndale
Location: 6625 Lyndale
Use: Parking Lot
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - None.
Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 6279 in Resolution Book No. 45.
Council Meeting Minutes -10- August 11, 1980
14. Minutes, Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contracts, Adams Hill Park
Redevelopment Project
Community Services Director Don Fondrick reviewed the bids received for
the Adams Hill Park Redevelopment. The bids were requested under three categories;
, site construction, building construction and plantings. Mr. Fondrick recommended
that construction begin as soon as feasible and that the following bids be approved;
Contract A - Site Construction - Include the base bid, Alternate 1,
Alternate 2, Alternate 3, Alternate 4 and two units of Alternate 5
for a total package of $310,022.05, as submitted in the proposal of
Sebesta Construction, Inc.
Contract B - Building Construction - Include the base bid, Alternate
4, Alternate 5, Alternate 6, Alternate 7, Alternate 8, Alternate 9,
and the unit price' for additional granular fill, if required, for a
total package of $167,879.OO,as submitted in the proposal of Barr/
Nelson, Inc.
Contract C - Plantings - Include the base bid and Alternate 1 as
submitted in the proposal of Timm Nursery and Landscape, Inc., but
defer action on this contract award until August 25, 1980, when
additional discussion can be concluded with the City of Edina.
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger to accept the bid minutes and
tabulations on the Adams Hill Park Improvement project.
All ayes - Carried.
Motion by Bunce, seconded by Ludeman that the following resolution be adopted;
that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of these minutes:
RESOLUTION N0. 6276
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
TO BARR/NELSON, INC. FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
FOR THE ADAMS HILL PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CITY PROJECT N0. 749
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - None.
Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 6276 in Resolution Book No. 45.
Motion by Bunce, seconded by Ludeman that the following resolution be adopted;
• Council Meeting Minutes -11- August 11, 1980
.-
that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of these minutes:
RESOLUTION N0. 6277
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
TO SEBESTA CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR SITE
CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ADAMS HILL PARK IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT CITY PROJECT N0. 649
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - None.
Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 6277 in Resolution Book No. 45.
Motion by Bunce, seconded by Ludeman to defer action on awarding the contract
for plantings until August 25, 1980.
All ayes - Carried.
15. Referral of Proposed Sale of City Owned Property to Planning Commission
City Manager Karl Nollenberger advised the city council that the staff is
in the process of formulating a developer's agreement with the S & M Company for
renovation of Lyndale Hardware. Part of the agreement is to sell the residual
land of the former Amoco site and part of the Betty Crocker Pie property to the
S & M Company. He recommended that the planning commission review the proposed
sale of this public property as authorized u.n MN Statutes 462.356.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Ludeman to refer the proposed sale of the
residual Amoco and Betty Crocker Pie Shop. land to the Planning Commission for
their review as to its conformance with the comprehensive plan and to request
the commission to make th,,eir finding on this matter before the August 25 city
council meeting.
All ayes - Carried.
16. Resolution Receiving Special Assessment Roll and Calling for Public Hearing,
C.P. 705
City Manager Karl Nollenberger advised the city council that the notice of
public hearing regarding the City Project 705 had been lost by the newspapers.
Since, according to law, this notice must be published fourteen days in advance
Council Meeting Minutes -12- August 11, 1980,
of the public hearing, the city manager recommended that the date of hearing be
set for September 8, 1980.
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Ludeman that the following resolution be
adopted; that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of
these minutes:
RESOLUTION N0. 6278
RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND CALLING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
L/H/N STREET IMPROVEMENT - CITY PROJECT N0. 705
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - None.
Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 6278 in Resolution Book No. 45.
17. Resolution Ordering Bond Sale, C. P. 705
City Manager Karl Nollenberger presented a resolution ordering the bond sale
for City Project 705 for city council approval. C. P. 705 is the project providing
for miscellaneous improvements within the L/H/N redevelopment.
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Luettinger that the following resolution be
adopted; that it be spread in the resolution book and that it be made a part of
these minutes:
RESOLUTION N0. 6280
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF $6,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
} IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1980
Poll of votes: Ayes - Bunce, Collins, Ludeman, Luettinger, Priebe. Nays - None.
Carried. This resolution appears as Resolution No. 6280 in Resolution Book No. 45.
18. Comprehensive Stop Sign Policy
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Collins to defer consideration of this
item until August 25, 1980.
All ayes - Carried.
19. Traffic Control Requests
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Collins to defer consideration of this
Council Meeting Minutes -13- August 11, 1980
item until August 25, 1980.
All ayes - Carried.
20. Energy Awareness Commission Recommendations Relating to Street Lighting
and Stop Sign Considerations
Motion by Luettinger, seconded by Collins to defer consideration of this
item until August 25, 1980.
All ayes - Carried.
21. Discussion of Proposed Building Project for League of Minnesota Cities
City Manager Karl Nollenberger reviewed a letter received from the League
of Minnesota Cities discussing the possibility of providing permanent office space
for the League offices. The League of Minnesota Cities presently rents office
space in St. Paul and pays an annual rental of approximately $60,000. The League
Board of Directors has requested each member city to discuss the proposed building
project and consider the payment options. They have proposed the two following
options:
Payment Options
One lump payment option (paid in first year)
Five year option plan
Ten year option plan
Alternate Payment Option
Cities assist in retiring debt through increased dues.
The council discussed the options proposed. Councilman Luettinger expressed
f
his concern about allowing staff to park free.
Motion by Bunce, seconded by Collins to express support for the project and
to select the alternate payment option to assist in retiring the debt of providing
a new facility for the League offices.
All ayes - Carried.
22. Consent Agenda
Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Collins that the following items be approved:
Council Meeting Minutes -14- August 11, 1980
1. Resolution Relating to Terms of Energy Commission - Council Letter 279
Set the terms of the appointees, using a July to July cycle
as follows:
Dennis Louis, Chairman 3 year term
Herbert Doty, Vice Chairman 3 year term
John Moon, Secretary 2 year term
Vern Lace 2 year term
Leon Lunas 2 year term
Sharon Erding 1 year term
A. John .Olinger 1 year term
2. Release of Off-Street Parking Bonds - Council Letter 278
RESOLUTION N0. 6273
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND
ON OFF-STREET PARKING
Shakey's Pizza, 7716 Morgan
Location: 7708 Fifth Avenue
Use: Office building
RESOLUTION N0. 6274
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND
ON OFF-STREET PARKING
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
224. S. Fifth Street, Minneapolis
Location: 320 West 66th Street
Use: Communications
RESOLUTION N0. 6275
RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND
ON OFF-STREET PARKING
Sir Waxer, 105 W. Michigan, Milwaukee
Location: 6645 Penn
Use: Car Wash/Wax and Polish Maintenance Service
t
3. Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement Suburban Police Recruitment
System - Council Letter 272
RESOLUTION N0. 6271
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT IN THE -.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE SUBURBAN
POLICE RECRUITMENT SYSTEM
4. Purchases in Excess of $12000 - Council Letter 274
Council Meeting Minutes -15- August 11, 1980
~=
Sign for Lyndale Avenue Store in the amount of $2,785 from Lawrence Signs.
5. Claims and Payrolls
RICHFIELD BANK & TRUST
Checks 61006/61073 Payroll $ 186,788.78
Checks 1345/47803 General 586,528.63
SUMMIT STATE BANK
Checks 55148/55171 $1;939,563.75
b. Payments and Estimates
Final - Viking Fence & Construction - fencing golf course
C.P. 688 - $3,845.42 - 100% complete
7. Licenses
New Ground Round, 1504 E. 78th Street Tavern
Fee Waived
New Ten permit - Church of Assumption Fun Fest
August 16, 17, 1980.
Street Barricades
Michael Fornicora, 6404 Girard, August 24, 1980 block party
Girard Avenue, 64th - 65th Street
Frank Yates, 6737 1st Avenue, August 24, 1980 block party
First Avenue, 67th - 68th Street, 4:00 p.m. ~ midnight
23. Adjournment
Motion by Bunce, seconded by Collins that the meeting adjourn.
All ayes - Carried. Time: 12:30 a.m. - August 12, 1980.
t
Date Approved:
Sylvia K. Bergh Acting City Clerk
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
~ ~-{ ~.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 266
August 10, 1981
The Honorable Mayor
and I ~ ,~r~.~-~~ cQv e~~ ~~r ~ ~, ~ ~- w, ~ _
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield ~~`°~``Q ~°'-~ ^~~ ~~ ~`
Council Members : ~~'c°~~ ~~
Subject: Transitory Ordinance Providing for
Expenditure of Money from the Special
Revenue Fund, Second Reading
On July 13, 1981, the city council gave first reading
approval to a transitory ordinance appropriating money from
the Special Revenue Fund for park land acquisition, the
Civic Plaza sculpture, and a city hall security system. A
copy of the proposed transitory ordinance is attached.
The appropriation for park land acquisition is essentially
an exchange of special revenue monies for general revenue
sharing funds, in accordance with the adopted 1981 capital
budget. The appropriation for the civic plaza sculpture,
while not included as a separate project in the 1981 capital
budget, will enable completion of the civic plaza portion
of the overall L/H/N redevelopment plan. Representatives of the
civic sculpture committee will be present to report on the
progress of their activities to the city council. The city
hall security system has been added to the general building
improvement program that has been underway for the past two
years, involving city hall remodeling and upgrading,
installation of a new telephone system, and various energy ,
improvements, culminating in the expansion of the public safety
facility, scheduled for completion by the spring of 1982. The
security system purchase contract was approved at the July 13
city council meeting.
It is recommended that the city council give second
reading approval to the attached transitory ordinance at the
August 10, 1981. city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
{{
Karl Nollenberger
City I~'[anager
KN/sh
cc: Administrative Services Director
Community Services Director
Community Development Director
Finance Coordinator
Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator
Bill 1981-13
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE N0. 16,81
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE
OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR
CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND PARK LAND
ACQUISITION AND BETTERMENT
The City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1, It is found and determined necessary and expendient for
the City of Richfield to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for
the making of the Capital Improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, and
for the acquisition and betterment of public parks and playgrounds, projects
for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds,
Section Z, The capital improvements and the amounts of expenditure
for such improvements which are hereby authorized to be paid from the Special
Revenue Fund. under Chapter 7, Section 7.12, subdivision 2, of the City Charter,
are as follows:
Civic Plaza Sculpture $20 000
Park Land Acquisition 25,000
General Government Buildings 6,000
51 000
Section 3. The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to
such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council resolution,
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of
August, 1981,
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K, Bergh City Clerk
~ ~ ~ ~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 265
Agenda August 10, 19E1
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement,
Hennepin County Criminal Justice
Coordinating Council
In 1977, the City of Richfield joined with 28 other
governmental units in Hennepin County to form the Hennepin
County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. The council has
been responsible for inter-agency planning in the law enforce-
ment. area, and particularly for the review of grant applica-
tions under the LEAA program. In recent years, the council
has become more actively involved in inter-agency planning
for area-wide law enforcement projects.
Presently the HCCJC Board is made up of both elected
officials and staff members from the participating units of
government, as well as four citizens at large. With the
reduction of LEAA funds to support the operation and activities
of the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council, the Board of
Directors has decided to supplement existing resources through
the solicitation of funds from private foundations. In this
regard, the Board of Directors feels it would be beneficial to
add two additional citizen members to the Board to provide
for representation from various private foundations.
It is recommended that
ment to the Hennepin County
increasing citizen-at-large
Directors from four to six
KN/sh
the. city council approve an amend-
Criminal Justice Council Bylaws,
membership on the Board of
members.
Respectfully submitted,
t ,~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
cc: Public Safety Director
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO
HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL BYLAWS
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield recognizes the need for
criminal justice planning and coordination on a countywide basis:
and,
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield therefore participated by
formal resolution authorizing its membership in the Hennepin County
Criminal Justice Coordinating Council; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating
Council has proposed an amendment to the Coordinating Council's
Operational Bylaws wherein representation from private sector
agencies would be increased from four to six positions so as to
enhance the Council's ability to more accurately reflect community
interest and needs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Richfield does approve this amendment to the Operational
Bylaws of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this
day of 1981.
Donald J. Priebe Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk
~ ~~ ~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 263
Agenda August 10, 1981
The Honorable fiayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Hearing on Application for On-Sale
` Liquor, Sunday Liquor and Tavern Licenses,
Consul Corporation (dba Chi Chi' Mexican
Restaurant and D~aximillian's)
The city has received an application for on-sale liquor,
Sunday liquor, and a tavern license for the Consul Corporation,
which is in the process .of purchasing the Left Guard Corporation
at 7717 Nicollet Avenue South. ,
The Public Safety Department has- concluded the required
background investigation and is prepared to submit testimony
for the required public hearing on the requested licenses.
It is recommended that the city council set the date for
a public hearing on the on-sale liquor, Sunday liquor, and
tavern license applications submitted by Consul Corporation
for August 24, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
~-
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/sh
cc: Public Safety Director
City Clerk
_,
1) Number of occupants residing in dwelling,
2) Does the house and garage appear to be in good repair? V ~S
3) Is the yard enclosed with a fence? ~ f ~ ~'~ ~ ~~^c~o
is the fence in good repair? ~~~ ~ If the occupant has dogs -
Will the fence keep them on owner's property? ~~ ~ /
4) Is garbage kept in metal garbage cans? -'~ (~S ~`' ~
5) Are garbage cans kept out of public view? ~~ ~ s
S) Are cars and/or trucks parked on lacvn - either front or rear of house? ~~
6) Are there inoperable vehicles in outside storage? /~ (~
7} Is the Iawn well kept and grass under 6" in height? ~~~
8) Is driveway in good repair? X ~ S 7-
9) How man animals requiring licenses reside at this address?
Dogs `',~ Cats
10) Give breed and sex of animals: f ~ U
~ w`, u ~'L S f
/~ a ~ /
11) IVas food in open dish and available outdoors for pet at all times?
Yes- ~ No (If so, advise owner to stop the practice).
12) Are pets kept for breeding purposes? Yes ~, No_~
13) How many pets were licensed last year? ~~ f
14) How are pets exercised . (areawise} ? J~; v ~ ~ 1-c" e ~ ~^ ~ ( ~ ~ ~, v G
15) Are there unpleasant odors present? ~d
16) Date ~'-/7- ~/
,~ PAID •
RECEIPT N0. CITY OF RICHFIELD
~~_ E;700 Portland Avenue South
"CG:'SL :Vtt. Richfield, PiN 55423 -
• DEPUTY X56 APPLICATION FOR KEh`.3EL LICENSE
June 1, 19~to May 31, 19~
NEW
RL: \ i:WAL_~
~~
Applicant's Name: ~L~/~/~' ~) , ~~-~~-(~/~/ S'~- FEE:
Applicant's Address: 7~~c} ~'/yryJ~jc~c:/.~ ~ ~GJ~ So Residential Kennel $10.00
--~
Applicant's Telephone Number: ~j~, q-,~~o`3 Commercial Kennel -5~-8~9~/OO.oG
-~-
Bus.Name: ~~,FESS/or./fy L ~~(~0.~'i~~G- >TOTAL AriOUNT DUE $ /Ua• ° ~
~. //
Bus , Addres§ : 7 f~~~cj T7~/i7~f3 oL.,C~ ~ ,f~~~ So -~
Bus Telephone Number: ~~~ ~c~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I (we) hereby agree to operate such business in accordance with the laws of Piinnesota and
the ordinances of the City of Richfield. The foregoing statements are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief. a
.;. -, ~ ~`
Authorized Signature: ~~-~ r Date; i~ /~ / ~~
~mplete for Residential Kennel only.)
rrrPROVAL OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS TO RESIDENTIAL KENNEL
(A place where more than two dogs or two cats are kept on premises which are zoned and
qualified for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats is incidental
to -the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes.)
Ordinance Code 5.28, Subd.3, states: "The application for a residential kennel license shall
be accompanied by a petition showing the approval of the occupants of privately owned real
estate abutting the premises on which the kennel is to be located. Whether or not all of the
occupants of abutting property approve the application, the Council may grant or dent the
license. -The license shall not be granted unless the Council finds that the use of the
applicant's premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to have,
any'-adverse effect upon adjacent properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not constitute
a nuisance to the neighborhood. The Council may impose conditions upon the granting of any
residential kennel license."
I HEREBY APPROVE OF A RESI ENTI KENNEL ON THE PREMISES OF: •~2 ~~~~~7°"-"
NA~E~~ _ ~ ADDRESS: 1
1
~.
~.
3.
/~ /i ~
7~~~
1LTH DEPT. APPROVAL: YES
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES
_% J
~ ~~
71~ Y
s $ __
7F r,
~ 3ifi5' b ... , ... .... _ ,
FO_F CITY USE OieLY
NO Signed: ~. ~ _ r ` Q-e.~~,~/ -Date; 7~a4~,~'/
NO DATE:
F ~ i•
.RECEIPT .IaTO. CITY Or RICHFLELD DCrV ~ i ~~~ NEW_ -
6700 Portland Avenue South JUN ,$~ ~j
LICt~:~'S;. Nn. ~ Richiie.ld, Pl:d 55423 RlaI:Wr1L~
APPLICATIO\' FOR KEN,IEL LICE- ~ , S ~ D 1
June 1, 19 to May 31, 19
Applicant's Name: ~ r.1. FEE:
Applicant's Address: ~~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~ i,~.M, ~_~ ~~..~ ~b ' Residential Kenne~
Applicant's Telephone Number: ~(~~~ tj~G; Commercial Kennel~~~
Bus .Name:. Z ~ j~ ~ TOTAL APfOUNT DUE $
Bus . Address : ~' ~,~. it b •
Bus. Telephone Number: ~'' ~ vt/1 CU •
I {we) hereby agree to operate such business in accordance with the laws of Piinnesota and
the ordinances of the City of Richfield. The foregoing statements are true and correct
to-the best of my knowled a and belief.
Authorized Signature: e `j Date;. ~- `a~" ~ ~
''^.omplete-for Residential Kennel only.)
PROVAL OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY Ot~INERS TO RESIDENTIAL KENNEL
(A place where more than two dogs or two cats are kept on premises which are zoned and
.qualified for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats is incidental
to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes.)
Ordinance Code 5.28, Subd.3, states: "The application for a residential kennel license shall
be accompanied by a petition showing the approval of the occupants of privately owned real
estate-abutting the premises on which the kennel is to be located. Whether or not all of the
occupants of abutting property approve the application, the Council may grant or deny the
license. The license shall not be granted unless the Council finds that the use of 'the
applicant's premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to have,
any adverse effect upon adjacent properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not constitute
,a nuisance to the neighborhood. The Council may impose conditions upon the granting of any
residential kennel license." '
I HEREBY APPROVE OF A RESIDENTIAL KENNEL ON THE PREMISES OF:
NAME - ~ ADDRESS:
~' / 3
FOP CITY USE O;~LY
"FALTH DEPT. APPROVAL: ~/ YES NO Signed: ~~~~,L~,,,,,/~ Date; ~f~~~~f
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES NO DATE:
't
?_
a~' ~~
;`
h ...ti::.+r~-,z. Feu ~.:~. _ _. _ -
1} Number of occupants residing in dwelling. ~
2) Does the house and garage appear to be in good repair? i~ Q S .
3) Is the ,yard enclosed with a fence? ~ c j
is the fence in good repair? ~ ~--If the occupant has dogs -
Wi21 the fence keep them on ..owner's property? ,~E~,~
4) Is garbage kept in metal garbage cans? ,:< S ~-- '
S} Are garbage cans kept out of public view? ,~.~ S ~>
S) Are cars and/or trucks parked on la:vn - either front or rear of house? i!~ O
() Are there inoperable vehicles in outside storage? QUO
7) Is the lawn well kept and grass under 6" in height? ,. ~_S
8) Is driveway in good repair? ,, e S ~`_'~
9) How many animals requiring licenses reside at this address?
Dogs `~ Cats ~t// ~u ~ _ ~~`~ s « - !,'< <° t~ ~ Z
10) Give breed and sex of animals:
V ~ - ~;~
11) Was food in open dish and available outdoors for pet at alt times?
Yes ~ No (If so, advise owner to stop the practice).
12) Are pets kept for breeding purposes? Yes No~_
13) Flow many pets were licensed Iast year? ~/ ~
14) Now are pets exercised . (areawise) ? r5~ c f< -,. ~` "
15) Are there unpleasant odors present? ;^,,/c>
16) Date ~- ~/ • ~/
n __ .... - . _- _ . .. _
- - r,.~--
# i `, •.~
,~-.-.~0. CITY 0'r' RICHFIELD _. NEW - ~. ~;~~,' .
_~ t;700 Portland Avenue South t _
,•'SC N(1. Richfield, 1`i:d 55423 - R1:\I:WAL x
• f : :.
APPI,ICATIO:v' FOR KENNEL LICEN~ ~ - `
June 1, 19 to May 31, 19__~~1%'_„_
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k . .
~ /
Applicant's Name: .-] ~^~/c e /1~~ ~/I e ~ ~e -''~ FEE: 1
~, ;~
Applicant's Address: 731/Q ~ „~ ~ ~•S ca,~ ~v P- S n - Residential Kennel
i
Applicant's Telephone Number: `3G-~ --.~ 3 8~ Commercial Kennel~0~
Bus.Name: ;TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $~ " r
Bus . Addres's : .-,
Bus. Telephone Number: - }
I we hereb a ree too erate such business in accordance with the laws of Piinnesota an~ ~}'?:
( ) Y g P
the ordinances of the City of Richfield. The foregoing statements are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief. ~
~ ` a ~.
Authorized .Signature: e~ Date; ~ -"/~ "~l
- - - - - - - - - -t.L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -)
~mplete for Residential Kennel only.) ~ -~
.._PROVAL OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS TO RESIDENTIAL KENNEL
(A place where more than two dogs or two cats are kept on premises which are zoned and ^`~
qualified for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats is ~nciden al ~ ~-
to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes.) ~ ,,~~ ~
Ordinance Code 5.28, Subd.3, states: "The application for a residential kennel license s fall..=~,
be accompanied by a petition showing the approval of the occupants of privately owned re T`:``:~:`=..~i'~'
estate abutting the premises on which the kennel is to be located. Whether or not all o. the ~~`
occupants of abutting property approve the application, the Council may grant or den}c th~
license. The license shall not be granted unless the Council finds that the use of the t
applicant's premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to hate,
any .adverse effect upon adjacent properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not cons>~itute ":~~<~
a nuisance to the neighborhood. The Council may impose conditions upon the granting of`aziy :-
residential kennel license."
I HEREBY APPROVE OF A RESIDENTIAL KENNEL ON THE PREMISES OF:
NAPiE ADDRESS:
1. ,o . i~a-v~ ~~-x~ ~..~--~ (~ ~'rn-G~~ ~~-~ ~i~.~~ti~c. Lei { t_
~.~ ~y
FOP CITY USE OIeLY ~ lit
ALTH DEPT. APPROVAL: ~ YES NO Signed: ~ ~ , . ~c~ Date: 7 :~ } /,~ r
- -- x -
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES NO DATE:
+ r
_ r
..<<_~
1) Number of occupants residing in dwelling.~_
2) Does the house and garage appear to be in good repair? \ r ~
3) Is the yard enclosed with a fonce? ~~~c;
Is the fence in good repair? 1~;, S If the occunant has dogs -
Will the fence keep them on owner's property? ~,i~,<.
4) Is garbage kept in metal garbage cans? ~`/ ~ ,_
S) Are garbage cans kept out of public view? ~i~., ~~
5) Are cars and/or trucks parked on Ia:,m - either front or rear of house?
6) Are there inoperable vehicles in outside storage? -'_~
7) Is the lawn well kept and grass under 6" in height? err-
8) Is driveway in good repair? ~t_c, ~~ ` -~ ~ ~..-,.~_ ~_
9) How manx animals requiring licenses reside at this address?
Dogs ~~ Cats ~;,
10) Give breed and sex of animals:
~ ,r !~ .:
~~ ~~~ ~ .?
..~ `~~~ ~w~-ems, ~'~t (;' .~~~,r~
J L
~~~
11) ti4as food in open dish and available outdoors for pet at all times?
Yes No 1 (If so, advise owner to stop the practice).
12) Are pets kept for breeding purposes? Yes y, No
13) How many pets were .licensed last year? „~ xr~ --~~- ~;';
14) How are pets exercised. (areawise)? t~;,~~,,,.,~r „~~ ~ ~_. ,;,•~ ~. i
15) Are there unpleasant odors present? i'~)~1 •
~ 1.
16) Date : ~, .-„ ;r, ' ~`~
~} ~ J
TT i; L- ~
C_ •; I G / Cs ~~ ~ ~
~~~ ~
h ..
-~CEIPT i~0.
-CITY Or RICHFIELD ~P` ,~Y ~56' NEW
E~'SL NC1
s:` 6700 Portland Avenue So~
PI13 55423
Richfie
ld
Rl•:tiEWAL~
. = .
,_ ~~ ,~{~
i 1; APPLICATIO ` FOR KEN;JEL LICEN E
D
~ ~i
19
31
1 19 t
; ay
,
June
,
to .
1~FI~ ' ~~S~ ~
C
s
icant Name: m ~
~,~ FEE:
~f
,`
licant's
~~ ~
Address:
( ,(
SG3`C
~ ~j~daY}1.(Y1.C{~y~ ~~~}~
~Q,. Residential Kennel: ,
Licant's Telephone Number: ~~ ~, ~~~~ Commercial Kennel~~/~ _'
~~~ `
~ Name : ` //~~
' 1. ~-F-t'K ~S (
1~r
G ~ !Yl ~ S
-TOTAL AriOUNT DUE
$~%~~0~
,
. Address: t-~L~}n ~ ~ST ~ ~ ~ ST~~-"~
:~Teleph'one, .Number.: d 3s~ ~ ~ ,
r~ Y 4 ,l. ,.
ae) hereby agree to operate such business in accordance with the laws of Minnesota and
`ordinances of the City of Richfield. The foregoing statements are true and correct
the best of my knowledge and belief. ~
i~orized Signature: ~ Date; 7~ ~qy D
~~~': ;
Clete for Residential Kennel only.)
OVAL OF ONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS TO RESIDENTIAL KENNEL
;.~
r ~ ~:
~~.. ;
{A place where more than two dogs or two cats are kept on premises which are zoned and
qualified for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats ~is incidental
to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes.)
Y
Ord~.nance Code 5.28, Subd.3, states: "The application for a residential kennel license shall'
e accompanied, by a petition showing the approval of the occupants of privately owned real
~es~ate""abutting the premises on which the kennel is to be located. .Whether or not all of the
> ; 1
occupants: of abutting property approve the application, the Council may grant or deny the
license, The-license shall not be granted unless the Council finds that the use of the
.applicant's premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to have,
a.ny;adverse effect upon adjacent properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not constitute
'S"riuisance'to the neighborhood. The Council may impose conditions upon the granting of any
~~residential kennel license."
#~ ''-
t :1 ~
Ii<HEREBY APPROVE OF A RESIDENTIAL KENNEL ON THE PREMISES OF:
.. -- -
3t.NAME ~ ADDRESS:
1: S. ~//
~~~
~~'y ~,' FOP CITY USE ONLY
'l~.LTH DEPT. APPROVAL: t~ YES NO Signed:__ ~~~~~J Date; 7~~~~f
CITY,COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES NO DATE:
#. ~~} '
. ,~. ~. -
'- ~~
y ~ i
1) Number of occupants residing in dwelling.
2} Does the house and garage appear to be in good repair? ~j~ ~
3) Is the yard. enclosed with a fence? /I/0
Is the fence in good repair? If the occupant has dogs -
Will the fence keep them on owner's property?
4) Is garbage kept in metal garbage cans? ~~~.5
5} Are garbage cans kept out of public view? ~-~ S L~
S) Are cars and/or trucks parked on 2aE,m -either front or rear of house?
6) Are there inoperable vehicles in outside storage? (~~
7) Is the lawn well kept and grass under .6" in height? ~/ ~S
8) Is driveway in good repair? ~~ s ~-
9) How many animals requiring licenses reside at this address?
Dogs Cats__~_
10) Give breed and sex of animals
~6~LN ~ 5 ~~ ~ s G~ C.) N
l.- /'~Z 2 / ~ .
11) {Vas food in open dish and available outdoors for pet at all times?
Yes_~i No (If so, advise owner to stop the ractice).
12) Are pets kept for breeding purposes? Yes No
13) How many pets were licensed last year?
14) How are pets exercised.(areawise)? - ~,o ~ S t
15) Are there unpleasant odors present? ~y
16) Date 7 - ~ / - ~~
C.s.v 3~~
~ P~~
CITY OF RICHFIELD NEW
6700 Portland Avenue South
,~~ ~~ _
i~0~
• Richiie.ld, MN 55423 Rl:\I:6Jr1L~
'' ~ "` ~~~i APPI.ICATIO:v' FOR KEN;IEL LIC 'v E ~ct'UTY ~5l~
~. ~~:
,'~~,
,,
June 1, 19 to May 31, 19 _
-`l
.~plicant's Name: FEE:
r~~~~~~ ~~,~.
' ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ,
Applicant',s Address:~lr~y ~~~-a~~~~.c.~ r ~'~'_~ Residential Kennel~~
~pplicant'~s Telephone Number: ~~l ' ~ Y~ ~ Commercial Kennel~OD -
~ t
3
'Bus Name i ~ =TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $~ ~~
afus~~Address
i`.
~~us: Telephone Number: ~ ^-
p~a--- _-r,~--~_
~1 ~- ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -;- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~, ~
I~j(we) hereby agree to operate such business in accordance with the laws of rlinnesota and
the~~ordinances of the City of Richfield. The foregoing statements are true and correct
to ~he best of my knowledge and belief.
.~ .~
a'`' ' , -.
,,uthorized Signature:~~~~4~i2~ ~ .~C.~xG - Date; ~,~a ~$~~
omplete for Residential Kennel only.)
at'PROVAL OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS TO RESIDENTIAL KENNEL'
(A place where more than two. dogs or two cats are kept on premises which are zoned and
qualified for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats is incidental
to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes.) .
Ordinance Code 5.28, Subd.3, states: "The application for a residential kennel license shall
be accompanied by a petition showing the approval of the occupants of privately owned real
estate abutting the premises on which the kennel is to be located. Whether or not all of the
~accupants`of abutting property approve the application, the Council may grant or deny the
license: The license shall not be granted unless the Council finds that the use of the
.applicant's premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to have,
any~•adverse effect upon adjacent properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not constitute
a~'nuisance`to the neighborhood. The Council may impose conditions upon the granting of any
residential kennel license."
r. .
I HEREBY APFROVE OF A RESIDENTIAL KENNEL ON THE PREMISES OF:
}' ~NAA1E ~ ADDRESS: ~
.S C L fhr~ U
FO_P CITY USE O;~LY
- -----~ n
4LTH DEPT. APPROVAL: ~/ YES NO Signed:yt ,f-i.~~-~e,t~ Date; 7 ",j7 ,J
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES NO DATE:
,,.~ r ~ w
~ . ,~
~?~ .
3x ~ 4•
:4 ~ ~f•
y~
.:~
1) Number of occupants residing in dwelling. ~_
2) Does the house and garage appear to be in good repair? ~ ~
3) Is the yard enclosed with a fence? ~'~ ,~
is the fence in good repair? ~~~ If the occupant has dogs -
Will the fence keep them on owner's property? ~,<
4) Is garbage kept in metal garbage cans?
5) Are garbage cans kept out of public view? ~ <<
5) Are cars and/or trucks parked on lawn - either r"runt or rear of house?1~rL
6) Are there inoperable vehicles in outside storage? !~
7) Is the lawn well kept and grass under 6" in height? Y O
8) Is driveway in good repair?
9) How many animals requiring licenses reside at this address?
Dogs L Cats
10) -Give breed and sex of animals:
~ C c.•~r~~ r~ S1~,e.~A~^ (~
11) Was food in open dish and available outdoors
Yes No (If so, advise owner to s
12) Are'~ets kept for breeding purposes? Yes
13) How many pets were licensed Iast year? ~
14) Now are pets exercised . (areawise} ? ~-Q,~,;~_,~ ~N
15) Are there unpleasant odors present? Nn
for pet at all times?
t_op the `ractice Ac~~~,5~--9
- No~/~
rrc ~_ ~A~^C~
16) Date .~~..1,~ 17 i~/`~,
+ ~
,1 ~~
.RECEIPT N0. -CITY Or RICHFIELD ""~~ NEW
00 Portland Avenue South
~.1CE:~S,;. :Vn. ~: Richiie.ld, M.d 55423 RIaI:WAL~
. ~'~ •:~
r
~; .d, ~': APPLICATIO ' FOR KEN.3EL LICE
x - - - - - - - - - - - -June 1 , 19 - _o-MaY-31 ~-19 - - - - } - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
b i f -•
,Applicant's Name: ~ ~S J 1'Y~ FEE:
~t"` ~G ~G ~ ~S
'Applicant's Address: Residential Kenne l
Applicant•'s Telephone Number: `~ ~ ~ ~ Commercial KenneJ.~~
~,>, ;. ~~
Bus .Name : - TOTAL AI`fOUNT DUE $ ~p
y,
Bus Address: "--' o -•
Bus telephone Number: ~--- `/
<y' ` t - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - -
,~. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1
I~(we) hereby agree to operate such business in accordance with the laws of Piinnesota and
-the ordinances of the City of Richfield. The foregoing statements are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
~ S `t 1~ .. ,• J
,Authorized Signature: Date;
ty~-~' ,.
^.omplete for Residential Kennel only.)
PROVAL OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY OWNERS TO RESIDENTIAL KENNEL
•(A place where more than two dogs or two cats are kept on premises which are zoned and
:;.qualified-.for residential purposes, and where the keeping of such dogs or cats is incidental
,~to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes.) •~
~~''`~ ' -
~Ordinance Code 5.28, Subd.3, states: "The application for a residential kennel license shall
'be accompanied by a petition showing the approval of the occupants of privately owned real
estate `abutting the premises on which the kennel is to be located. Whether or not all of the
occupants of abutting propefty approve the application, the Council may grant or deny the
license.` The license shall not be granted unless the Council finds that the use of 'the
applicant's premises as a residential kennel will not have, or will not be likely to have,
any;"adverse effect upon adjacent properties or the occupancy thereof, and will not constitute
a nuisance to the neighborhood. The Council may impose conditions upon the granting of any
residential kennel license."
~~HERE$Y APPROVE OF A RESIDENTIAL KENNEL ON THE PREMISES OF:'
~~ qE ~~ -, ~ ~ ADDRESS:
G7
~.
.~~
2:~.
~ n
~a~~~ 1~ to c~.r
tl A l~
. ,
.~
7_ ~•
,,
'
.YN::
o~ 7 0
--~-
FOP CITY USE ONLY
r.ALTH DEPT. APPROVAL: YES NO Signed: _ Date;
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES NO DATE:
~z~~ k;;
x }'{Y
~ .~-4:r ~ ? \.
~aE~ "
.,.r `
1) Number of occupants residing in dwelling.
2) Does the house and garage appear to be in good repair? ~ ~ S
3) Is the yard enclosed with a fence? ~~
is the fence in good repair? ~ s ~ the occupant has dogs - _
Will the fence kee them on wner's ro ert ' ~ .~ "`"'~ O vp /•
4) Is garbage kept in metal garbage cans? _ ~ c'S
5) Are garbage cans kept out of public view?'~~_~~
5) Are cars and/or trucks parked on lawn - either front or rear of house? /~ d
6) Are there inoperable vehicles in outside storage? /(~O
7) Is the lawn well kept and grass under 6" in height? ~
8) Is driveway in good repair? ~~ 5 ~~
9) How many animals requiring licenses reside at this address?
Dogs ~~ Cats
10) Give breed and sex of animals:
~~ w1 V ~ 5
~ K ~ -t.~
/ ~-~ vv~ c2 /`~ •
11) t9as foo in open dish and available outdoors for pet at all times?
Yes ~ Nv (1f so, advise owner to stop the practice).
12) Are pets kept for breeding purposes? Yes No~_
13) Now many pets were licensed Iast year? ~~
14) How are pets exercised.(areawise)? ~ a N ~
15) Are there unpleasant odors present? , O
16) Date ) - / 7 - ~ ~_
. { ~- 2, 3
,~
"~ . ~ ~~ ~ 7 ~ U ef.;cc~y t ~'~' -, tt-y; -2~~,ti; . ~7t,~, ~u-~~'.~,.~- .l~C~ e.iie.~- C~
~~/~~ 0 r~ rc~l CCh:_c-~ ~ 1, Fr~C C,.w-v c. ~ Lc< =-« i _- ~ Xf - Lf' i- ~~!~- ~~
~.y ,
J
November 14, 1979
Mrs. Floyd Person
M 6720 Chicago Avenue
tV Richfield, MN. 55423
~ ~ Dear Mrs. Person:
Ln
~ '"!'ham nl t17 nn~,;?=Cil of t7i~ rr~ ty nF ~;. ~7:~'yy~ a M'' ti;.^-.i~"
rant a kennel
1979 decided to~
of November 13
meetin
, g
g
,
O license to Ms. Myrtle Wickstrom. The kennel license
~~ N will allow for Ms. Wickstrom to maintain three dogs
at her home on Chicago Avenue. The city council did
not feel that there was a significant problem with
= the maintaining of three dogs at this location.
•~ If you have frequent problems with the housing of the
dogs, I would suggest that you contact the public
safety department whenever the problem exists. I am
~ sure that they will be more than happy to help you in
~ ~ any way that they can in order to insure the peace.
~
Sincerely yours,
~
Karl Nollenberger
O ,~ City Manager
KT1/era
~ ~~- P,ilhl_i_r- ~afei-.y DirAC-tnx'
wfr
^~
0
telephone: 869-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer