The URL can be used to link to this page

07-26-82 agenda~ ~~ A CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City i`lanager Council Letter No. 244 Agenda July 26, 1952 The Honorable i~iayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Submit Application for CP 744 - 67th Street and Lyndale Avenue Traffic Signal Installation of new traffic signals at the intersection of 67th Street and Lyndale Avenue is included as part of the revised capital budget for 1982. tVhen the final plans were being prepared for the L/H/N Lyndale Avenue improvement project between 64th Street and Lake Shore Drive, the signals were omitted because it was unclear what Richfield State Agency, primary contributor to the traffic entering at 67th Street, was going to do with their drive-up facility. A planned unit development has subsequently been approved for the Richfield State Agency which calls for the bank's drive-up facilities to exit onto 67th Street and on to Lyndale Avenue. A traffic signal is warranted at this time at the intersection, and the approved RSA development plan indicates that the traffic will continue at about the same level or be greater. The consulting engineering firm of Orr-Schelen-I~Iayeron, has prepared plans and specifications for this traffic signal. The signal will be financed by Municipal State Aid Funds (1ISA). The signal will be installed this year, but it will be necessary to borrow against next year's i`ISA allotment. The staff recommends that the city council adopt the attached resolutions, ordering the installation of the traffic signals, re- questing i`1SA funding, approving the plans and specifications, and ordering the advertisement of bids. Respectfully submitted, ~_ ~. ~ xc~+ L . ~ti'ilde ding City ~ianager JL~d/ e j a cc: Community Development Director City Engineer RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING C.P. 774 67TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PREPARATION OF PLANS WHEREAS, the council has determined that it is necessary to make improvement to the intersection of 67th Street and Lyndale Avenue by installation of a traffic signal; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the city council of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered; 2. That Orr-Schelen-Mayeron is hereby designated as engineer for this improvement and shall prepare plans and specifications for making of such improvement. 3. That the Commissioner of Transportation be requested to make an advance encumbrance on the City of Richfield's 1983 Municipal State Aid street account • to reimburse the city for said project. Passed by the city council of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of July, 1982. L John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR C.P. 774 67TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WHEREAS, Orr-Schelen-Mayeron has prepared plans and specifi- cations for the installation of a traffic signal at 67th Street and Lyndale Avenue and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval; NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the Richfield Sun Newspaper and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids >>pon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertise- ment shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the clerk until 10:30 A.M. on August 16, 1982, at which time they will be publically opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the city clerk and city engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7:00 P.M. in the council chambers on the 23rd of August, 1982, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and _ accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the clerk of the City of Richfield for five percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the council of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of July , 1982 . John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk ~ / • CITY OF RICHFIELD, P~IINNESOTA Office of City t-Tanager Council Letter Teo. 243 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Niayor and i~iembers of the City Council City of Richfield Council T~iembers Subject: Discussion of Neighborhood maintenance Problems at 6844 and 6900 Cedar Avenue Neighbors adjacent to the rental properties at 6844 and 6900 Cedar Avenue have requested that action be taken to correct maintenance problems at these two properties. A copy of this request which was submitted to the city manager and the city council is attached to this council letter. The Public Safety Department has been investigating these complaints, and Thomas Morgan, Director of Public Safety, will be present at the July 26, 1922 city council to discuss this situation. Respectfully submitted, '~ - - yd~^~.. G7ilde Acting. City Manager JLG1/ej a cc: Public Safety Director July 15, 1982 T0: CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: DETERIORATING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS SIR: In past years, the City has done a good job in improving commercial and Park/Recreational areas of the City. We would like your help in solving potentially serious residential problems in our neighborhood. Although the problems we will be listing may apply to many neighborhoods throughout our city, we are referring to two rental homes in our neighborhood located at 6844 & 6900 Cedar Ave. So. as noted below. * Loud, late night parties with upwards of 150 people ~ Junked, unlicensed automobile in the backyard * Significant increase in auto traffic * Unkept lawns, accumulated debris, junk, garb age * Littered streets & neighboring property ~ Parking violations * Urinating & vomiting on private property * Drunken, disorderly conduct * Our children can't sleep when loud parties are in progress and for days thereafter contend with broken glass and empty beer cans-on sidewalks and streets. In short, this is a public nuisance by any definition. Not the quality of life we've come to expect in Richfield. These conditions have persisted for the past several yaars i;~ spite of changing tenants. In the past, calls to city officials have resulted in prompt although temporary solutions to some of these problems. What we need ,are some long term solutions to the problems. Additional details of the types of problems we are experiencing are noted in Attachment'A'. Attachment 'B' is a copy of a letter recently sent to the owner of the property at 6844 Cedar Ave. So. • CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RICHFIELD RICHFIELD CITY COUNCIL July 15, 1982 Page 2 We would appreciate knowing what action the city can take in this regard, and also what we can do to help. We would•be willing to meet with the City Adminstration and property owners to discuss these problems, and possible solutions in more detail at your convenience. Please respond to Charles D. Herzog b845 18th Ave. So. Richfield, Minn. 55423 Respectfully Yours ~~~~ ~ ~ ;, ~ ~. ~ s ~' ~ ~ ~ .~ %j ~ !,.~.r~ ~3 - ~.; ~ , ~~ ~`~1~(JL~- - ~~tvrn 6 83 9 / g rh /~~ t S O. s ~~~<> ~ ~~~2~X ,, V' i ~ L, / C~ ~~ n ~~ ~~~ /~1~ C. , ,~ ~. ~~.Ti_ l~ ~ ~~ •ATTACHMENT A • Uncut lawns, weeds Tree trimmings lying about for several weeks Junk, debris, and garbage in yards anal on public walks Loud, late nite parties, 100 + people Loud radios/stereos in yard and parked cars Excessive traffic-weekends Speeding, reckless driving Cars parked extending into street Cars parked blocking driveways Cars parked wrong direction Using neighbors' driveways For mid-block change of direction and parking Littered streets, lawns, sidewalks {cans, paper, broken bottles, etc.} Urinatingcon private property, lawns, flower beds Drinking in automobiles Disorderly conduct at late hours • July 1, 1982 • Steven H. Berndt 2300 Central Avenue N.E.' rlinneapolis, Minn. 53418 ° Dear Nir. Berndt We understand that your tenant, Peter Smith, at 6844 Cedar, is moving or has moved. We hope that you will use better judgement in your next renters. For the past three years our neighborhood has been nothing but traffic, loud noises, parties,•people urinating on our lawns, garbage problems, and debris piled up behind and on the side of the garage. We would like you to correct this problem or we will be obliged to take other action. If you are out this way at some time we would be willing `to talk this problem over with you. ~~ ~~ J (~ ~' ~s- ~~ ~ ems. ~° ~ R o ~ -~ -7 ~~ ~ -~. ~!.~~ ~-c~3~3~ ~~ ~~~~^ __+____ ~ ~ `~ tf~~ ~ ~ 1~~ ~-. ~ /.' ~A~1 1 ~ ~`' ~~ loo C ,c ~~~~ • CITY OF RICHFIELD, T!INNESOTA Office of City Planager Council Letter No. 242 Agenda July 26, 192 The Honorable riayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council riembers Subject: Award of Contract, Four-Wheel Type TZechanical Front End Loader On July 19, 192 bids were opened for a four-wheel type mech- anical front end loader. The city clerk, a representative of the city manager, the community services director, the technical oper- ations coordinator and representatives of the bidding firms were in attendance. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulations is attach- ed for council review. • This truck is used primarily for sidewalk snowplowing and to assist in loading trucks with salt, sand and/or gravel in the win- ter. Dur~.ng the summer, it is used for landscaping type purposes in the L/H/N area, the Nature Center and various city parks. i~ionies for this purchase are available in the Central Garage Revolving Fund. ifinneapolis Equipment Company submitted one bid for a new, gas powered unit. The base unit amount was $24,210, but the unit would need to be painted and a cab would need to be ordered separate- ly. With an estimated $3,400 for the cab, the total price for this unit would be $27,960, plus an estimated $350 for painting. rlinnea- polis Equipment Company also submitted a bid for a used, diesel powered unit for $26,560. This unit has 145 hours of use, has a 60-day guarantee, includes the cab, but would need to be painted. Including the painting cost, the total cost of this unit would be $26,910. Olson Equipment Company submitted a bid for a used gas powered unit. The $22,000 bid for the unit with 40 hours of use in- cludes painting and a one-year guarantee. A cab would need to be purchased at a cost of $3,430. The total cost of this unit would be $25,430. It is recommended that the city council take the following actions: • 1. Approve the bid minutes and tabulations; Council Letter Tdo. 242 -2- July 26, 1982 • 2. Award a contract to Olson Equipment Company in the amount of $22,000 for a used, gas powered Waldon 5000 four wheel type mechanical front end loader; 3. Authorize purchase of a cab for the Waldon 5000 unit from Olson Equipment Company in the amount of $3,400. Respectfully submitted, ,~ ,~yc~ L. Wilde Acting City b2anager JLP]/ e j a cc: Finance Coordinator Community Services Director • • INT'EROr FILE MEI~SORANDLT~1 Date: 22 July 19b2 TO: Karl FROM: Joyce ~1,he front end loader purchase which is before the council for approval P•Ionday night is a change from the adopted 1982 budget. Just in case anyone asks, I thought I should update you a bit on this... we did discuss it with Don during review of his revised budget... The Nature Center adopted 1902 budget had a $16,000 approp- riation for purchase of a tractor. During the budget amend- rr~ent process in February, we reduced that appropriation and agreed to buy the i3ature Center vehicle from the Central Garage Fund. This front-end loader is a substitute for that Mature Center tractor. Although it casts more, it is also more versatile, and the 19E2 revised budget will show the increased cost. There is adequate money in the Garage Fund for the purchase. We'll be using this equipment to replace an ancient sidewalk plow that has been depreciated for about 5 years, so we really will be reducing our plannea vehicle inventory by one, since the loader will substitute for the tractor which was to have been bought as well as the existing sidewalk plow. (I think I right have been better off not even trying to explain!?) • CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening July 19, 1982 Four Wheel Type Articulated Loader Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for Four Wheel Type Articulated Loader, as advertised in the official newspaper on July 7, 1982. Present: Joyce Wilde, City Manager's Representative Don Fondrick, Community Services Director Marshall Raaen, Technical Operations Coordinator Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER & BID SECURITY TOTAL BID • Olson Equipment Co., Minneapolis Check $1,100 $22,000 MECO (Minneapolis Equipment Co.) Checks $1,?_50 24,210 (Gas) 78 26,560 (Deisel) The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the July 26, 1982 city council meeting. Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk ~~~c CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 241 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Purchase in Excess $2,500 The city charter requires the city council approve the pur- chase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction when the amount exceeds $2,500. There is one such item on the city council agenda for July 26, 1982. Traffic narking Tape Each year, the city stripes approximately 21 crosswalks with- in the city. The present method of corsswalk marking uses a paint • application which has a very short period of visibility, about five months or less. The cost per intersection to stripe is about $137, including paint, labor and equipment rental. With ope application per year under the present method, the four year cost of the program would be approximately $548 per intersection. There is a traffic marking tape available on the market. It is recoilunended that this reflective tape be purchased and install- ed to cover 8 crosswalks at random locations within the city as a test program. The material cost for this type of application would be approximately $493 per intersection, and labor would be an estim- ated $100 per intersection, for a total intersection cost of $593. While the cost using the reflective traffic tape method is $45 more per intersection than the painting method, the advantage is that the traffic tape application has an estimated life of four years, would not need to be reapplied every year, and the visibility would be greater than 5 months a year. The only local vendor of the 3-ti Traffic Marking Tape is Safety and Security Systems which quoted $82.20 per roll. The staff did attempt to locate other vendors, but they did not submit a quota- tion. Therefore, it is recomritended that the city council authorize the purchase of 48 rolls of 3-~1 Traffic r~Iarking Tape for a total purchase price of $3,945.60 from Safety and Security Systems. Respectfully /7s/ubmitted, ~a~~ L . Wilde Acting City Manager JtiV/eja ~~ • CITI' OF RICHFIELD, I~TINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter i•1o. 240 Agenda July 26, 1952 The Honorable I-Iayor and Members of the City Council Council Members: Subject: Transitory Ordinance Vacating Alley in Block 6, Lyndale Oaks Addition. Second Reading. Approval of Off-Street Parking Permit and Landscape Plan On July 12, 19c2, the council received a petition froralvlr. mark Ahlquist requesting vacation of the alley in Block 6, Lyn- dale Oaks Addition. At that time, the council passed a resolution accepting the petition and setting a public hearing on the matter for July 26, 1932. The council gave first reading approval to a transitory ordinance vacating the alley. • Mr. Ahlquist is also requesting that the city approve an off- street parking permit to allow hire to construct improvements to the existing parking areas on the site. In conjunction with Mr. Ahlquist's improvements, the city staff is requesting council approval of a landscape plan for buffering between I~ir. Ahlquist's property and the adjacent residential area, in accordance with the L/HjN redevelopment plan. The staff has reviewed this request for alley vacation, off- street parking permit and landscape plan and founts the following: 1. That there are overhead utility lines within the ex- isting alley right-of-way; 2. Subsequent to the July 12 council meeting, the staff has met with dir. Orwell Opdal, owner of the remaining comrlercial property abutting the alley . i`ir . Opdal in- dicated his support for vacation of the total alley as long as truck access to the rear of his buildings is not hindered. :~~r. Opdal has signed a petition requesting vacation of the portion of the alley adjacent to his property. A copy is attached to this council letter. 3. One property owner (515 ~~. 64th Street), has requested that access be maintained to his property from the alley because he parks his truck and stores material in his • back yard. Access to his garage is from Harriet Avenue. 4. Access to the garage of one residential property abutting the alley at 6420 Harriet Avenue is from the alley. Access to this garage would be maintained. Council Letter No. 240 -2- July 26, 19&2 • 5. The proposed improvements on the existing parking lot meet city standards, except for the width of the driving aisle at the northeast corner of the building, which is 19.5 feet wide instead of the required 22 feet wide; 6. The vacation of the alley would reduce city maintenance costs; 7. In conjunction with the improvements of the Ahlquist property, the staff i stall some landscape buffering on the property. Attached is a copy of the ment plan, which indicated a major la the existing alley. The city also ag landscape buffer in exchange for an e dale Avenue needed for the Lyndale Av The staff believes that as long as th improve the property with building an provements, now would be an opportune the landscape buffer area. 47hen the updated earlier this year, $2,500 was to the parking lot s proposing to in- perimeter of the approved redevelop- ndscape area along reed to provide the asement along Lyn- enue improvements. e owner desires to 3 parking lot im- time to install ~P 705 budget was identified to be used in this landscape butter area. '1'he $2,500 was not based upon any definite construction plan, but rather en- visioned Borne trees and shrubs to fill in existing gaps in permanent residential landscaping. Mr. Ahlquist has presented a plan which proposed a fence at the north property line along what is now the alley, between the cormlercial and residential property. In addition, landscaping would be added along the Harriet Avenue/64 1/2 Street frontage. A barrier curb will be constructed along the fence and landscaping in order to provide protection. The difference between the $2,500 budgeted a!~ount anc~ the $9,500 estimated cost would be obtained from the L/I:/N irrigation account, CP 7054. It was estimated that the irrigation would cost $150,000, whereas the total cost of the project, including all indirect costs, will be less than $140,000. Of the remaining balance, $7,000 could be transferred to the portion of project for funding these landscaping improvements ; • E. The alley vacation and fence construction will make it nec- essary to construct an additional curb cut off of Harriet Avenue to maintain separate access to the conunercial and residential property now having access to the alley. The cost of this curb cut is included in the $9,500 estimated project cost. It is recommended that the city council conduct the public hearing on this matter anti give second reading approval to the transitory ordinance vacating the alley in Block G Lyndale Oaks Council Letter No. 240 -3- July 26, 19b2 Addition. It is also recom;nended that the city council approve the off-street parking permit by passing the attached resolution. It is further recoirunended that the city council approve the land- scape plan for the buffer/screening and the curb cut construction. Respectfully submitted, ~..y ~ L. Wilde Acting City rianager cc: Community Development Director City Planner City Engineer Community Services Director Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator JL6d/ e j a i • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR • OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION NO. 82-2, CONTRACT NO. 2342 MARK AHLQUIST 6449 Lyndale Avenue South Location: 6439-61 Lyndale Avenue South Use: Parking Area BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the proposed geometric layout of the off-street parking as contained in Off-street Parking Application No. 82-2, Contract No. 2342, is hereby approved subject to and upon completion of performance of the contract for such off-street parking as herein- after authorized. 2. That the proposed off -street parking contract for the improvement of said off-street parking, bearing Contract No. 2342 be placed on file and that the manager be authorized to sign said contract and the clerk be authorized to seal the same for and on behalf of this city. 3. That the off-street parking operator provide the City of Richfield with Surety in the form of cash, passbook saving withdrawal authority, or performance bond in an amount to be determined by the community development director and city manager, to ensure the off-street parking lot is constructed within the terms and regula- tions of the Off -street Parking Agreement. 4.That responsibility for the proper upkeep and maintenance of said Off-street Parking lot shall remain the responsibility of the off-street parking lot. operator in accordance with Ordinance Code 4.05. Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this day of 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: • Sylvia K. Berg a.ty er Bill No. 1982- A TRANSITORY ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF THE ALLEY ON BLOCK 6, LYNDALE OAKS ~~._„~ V 1~-~Gt-~`Fll_Z-D C70~S ~~2'DAl h~ Section 1. The following alley within the City of Richfield, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, is hereby vacated: "The Platted Alley on Block 6, Lyndale Oaks" Section 2. This vacation shall be subject to perpetual easements existing on said alley to permit improvements or maintenance of said utilities. Section 3. The mayor and manager are authorized to take such action as is required to give effect to the vacation of the public right-of-way as provided in the foregoing section 1. • Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minne- sota, this day of 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk • • ~ • b ( . ~ i . . r... l\. • ~ • .~ _ ,-^ \ "~./ ~+ ~ ~+ . L. ~` 'S: r, ~ .~ ice- ~ „ ~_ t Jr• !- • ~„$ ~ i ~r f • r~r r ~~ T~.,. - - ~.--- ~ 1 , . -~ftlaflfliE. i C-.i'~ `~„ t .., , , ,,. i ~ V ~ y ~ Y . _ _ __ -_ -. - - -- - - .-- ~ -- ~ -- . _ _ _ ~ ~/ ( 1 , y, r (~ I .j ' • t!1 ~.. ~. °' ,. , i J ` `+. `,~' \ 5 o _. __ _ .. _ _. _ ~_... _ --- _____.__~ , ___ _- - _-- -_ ___ _ r _.~~ ` (IV' 7 _ . ._.. . _. _ ~ .-- _ .. _. ~ ~ : _.. ~ - . ~ .~ :: ~ ..u.... I s L,l I • _ .. .. V' r;i~~.~r„ aE'r, irr N(1RIWG=If-I {~ ~~ <~.-,r„rr< <,., FIGURE 14 i [. ~I ii_ I(. l 1~~~ IL~ J~ )~ ~~ _:1 Ii1CFFIEID LAKE PARK _ \`~ l--J ~ ~ .~~ '{~' ~, j 1 -~~ ~ l l ~ I ~ ~ ~~~ 4~ I .~. ~:C! 8 ACS°*"iW. ~-~ `~ r-~ ;alt i---I ~ 1 `~"~TM~ KEY: D / ~ ~' , ti, EpB/EM/ auuaoe ~ ixovoaEO suuua IRNIFi ~ ~ wuon vEaEemw araYEC1 • ~ rN ua woxu~E u~a ~~ ~I~ '.~° USE SU~ARr: l r J ~+ " • ~~ ~ YIYHMlY 1MIYINI IIJ \ ~ 160GgO M ~1i1 INIt 1Mt WOOD LAKE NATURE CENTER I 1 ~-~ r-- ~ VIII( RE~VELC7PMENT PLAN 80UgCE: RIch11Nd Conmudty DwNoph-enl Mpl. ..~>x.,. • Y ~ • •PETITION FOR STREET AND ALLEY VACATION CITY OF .RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • Date Received W ~; y ~ ~, ~. T0: The City Council of the City of. Richfield, Minnesota We, the undersigned owners of land abutting part of the platted alley in Block 6, Lyndale Oaks. hereby petition that the part of such street described in Attachment A be vacated by the City of Richfield Signature of Owners Address • Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of land abutting the street, alley, or public grounds (City Code of Ordinances, Section 12.04). ~:~ per cent County Public Works ~:_ ) checked by NSP fee paid Minnegasco Community Development Northwestern Bell Public Safety ~-~C K- 4_ri~cr _~~: City Planner • Attachment A: That part of the alley in Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, which lies between Lots 6,7,10,11,12,15,16, 17 and 18. PETITION FOR STREET AND ALLEY VACATION CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~~-g~Q ~ Date Received TO: The City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota We, the undersigned owners of land abutting part .of the platted alley in Block 6, Lyndale Oaks, hereby petition that th.e part of such street described in Attachment A be vacated by the City of Richfield Signature of Owners Address // y/,! /~ 7 ~~ L~-t.~t.. ~. ~""'~ c- *-~ C.c' J 7 - (,~ Y ~:. _3 G L. ,1 '~~i.~.-r yY _ ~"3-c: ~j / • Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of land abutting the street, alley, or public grounds (City Code of Ordinances, Section 12.04). per cent (Z~ checked by i ~_- ~~- g 2 f ee paid Community Development Public Safety County Public Works NSP Minnegasco Northwestern Bell ~-- City Planner Attachment A: That part of the alley in 61ock 6, Lyndale Oaks, which lies between Lots 4, 5, 6, 19, and all of lot 18 except the Northwesterly 25 feet • thereof. CITY OF RICHFIELD, NTI1\iNESOTA Office of City P~Zanager Council Letter No. 239 July 26, 1982 The Honorable mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Rezoning Property to MR-1 Multiple Residence, Second Reading On July 12, 1982, the city council gave first reading approval to an ordinance rezoning various properties in the city to MR-1 Multiple Residence. The council set July 26, 1982 as the public hearing on this matter. It is recommended that the city council conduct the public hearing on this ordinance amendment and then give second reading approval to the attached ordinance, at the July 26, • 1982 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, .,~- _~ yc L. Wilde Actinct City Manager JLia/ s kh cc: Community Development Director BILL NO. ORDINANCE N0. AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX C OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Appendix C of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota defining the boundaries of the various zoning districts of the city enumerated in Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.28, Subdivision 2 of such. code is hereby amended in the following respects; (1) Appendix C, Section 4 is amended by repealing paragraphs 1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 1S, 17,.21, 2.3,.24, 25, 26, 30, 33, 34, 35, 39, 40, 41, 42, 49, 52, 60, 61, 62, 70, 73, 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 83, 8.5, 86, 87, 89, 90, 93, 96, 97, 102, 116, 118 and 121. (2) Appendix C, Section 3, paragraph 58 is amended to read as follows: (58) Lots 1 through 8, Block 1, Wexlers Addition [, and Lots 5 through 8, Block 1, Cedar Sunrise Third Addition]. (3) Appendix C, Section 3 is amended by adding the following new Section 10: Section 10. Multiple Residence district (MR-1) 1. Lots 23 - 24 Block 2 Lein's Richfield Second Addition. 2. Lots 9 - 11 Block 1 Joe Mauers First Addition. 3. Lots 14 - 16 Block 10 Tingdale Brothers Lincoln Hills Third Addition. 4. Lot 23 and North ~ of Lot 22, Block 7 Tingdale Brothers Lincoln Hills Addition. 5. Lots 2 and 3 and the south 10 feet of Lot 1 of Block 2 Vicks Terrace Addition. 6. Lot 2, Block 1 Vicks Terrace Addition. 7. Lots 8 and 9, Block 1 Robert Weber's First Addition. 8. Lots 8 and 9, Block 1 Jungell Johnsons First Addition. 9. Lot 5, Block 2 Jungell Johnsons First Addition. 10. Lot 8, Block 12 Fairwood Park First Addition. 11. Lots 1 - 6 Block 1 A.N. Tacks First Addition. 12. Lot 3 and South 35 feet of Lot 2 Block 4 Rays Lynnhurst Second Addition. 13. Lot 21, Block 1 Irwin Shores No. 2. -2- 14. Lots 12, 13, 14, 15 and the South ~ of Lot 11, Block 2 Wood Lake Shores Addition. 15. The north 40 feet of Lot 22 and Lot 23 except the north 10 feet of Block 4 Irwindale Addition. 16. Lots 5 - 8 and the west 10 feet of Lots 1 - 4 Block 4 Nicollet Lots Addition. 17. Lots 1 - 4 A.A. Rogers Second Addition. 18. Lot 1, Block 8 Rearrangement of Nicollet Home Addition. 19. Lots 1 - 3, Block 1 Rearrangement of Nicollet Homes Second. Addition. 20. Lots 1 - 5, Block I Towns Edge Addition. 21. Lot 1, Block 8 Nicollet Home Addition. 22. The west ~ of Lot 1 except the east 7 feet Goodspeeds First Plat. 23. Lot 1, Block 2 Bauman Wheelock Addition. 24. Lots 13 - 15, Block 2 Savages First Addition. 25. Lots 6 and 7, Block 4 Coffmans Second Addition. 26. Lots 5 - 8, Block 4 Henry Thernell Addition. 27. Lots 7 - 10, Block 3 Mattson Heights Addition. 28. Lot 9 and 10 Auditors Sub No. 340. 29. Lots 2 - 4A and the south 43.5 feet of Lot I Zuberts Chicago Avenue Addition. 30. Lots 13 - 16 Block 11 Falldens Third Addition. 31. Lots 1 and 2, Block 4 Zuberts Elliot Avenue Addition. L 32. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 Falldens Fourth Addition. 33. Lots 15 and 16, Block 4 Wexlers Addition. 34. Tracts G, H, I, and J of Registered Land Survey No. 495. 35. Lots 1 - 7, Block 1 Elder Grove Fourth Addition. 36. Lots 1 - 4, Block 1 Zuberts Southview Gardens Third Addition. 37. Tracts E, F, G, H Registered Land Survey No. 734. 38. Lots 1 - 4, Block 1 Zubert Southview Gardens Fourth Addition. 39. Lots 5 - 8, Block 1 Cedar Sunrise Third Addition. 40. Lot 2, Block 1 Bassetts First Addition. 41. Lots 7 and 8, Block 16 New Ford Town Addition. 42. Lots 18 and 19, Block 3 New Ford Town Addition. 43. Lots 3 and 4, Block 5 New Ford Town Addition. 44. Lots 5 - 7, Block 6 New Ford Town Addition 45. . Lots 14 - 16, Block 14 New Ford Town Addition. 46. Lots 21 - 23, Block 7 New Ford Town Addition. 47. Lot 6 Rae Addition. -3- 48. Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 Falldens Fourth Addition. 49. Lots 1 - 3, Block 4 Lyndale Oaks Addition. 50. Lots 4 - 6, Block 5 Lyndale Oaks Addition. 51. Lot 23 and Lot 24 except the north 11 feet, Block 1 Blossom Park Addition.' 52. Lots S - 7, Block 1 Lynwood Addition. 53. Lot 8, Block 2 Joe Maurers First Addition. 54. Lot 2, Block 6 Nicollet View Gardens Addition. 55. Lots 10 - 12, Block 4 Wooddale Addition. 56. Lot 15 and the north half of Lot 14, Block 4 Irwindale Addition. 57. Tract C of Registered Land Survey No. 215. 58. Lot 5 Meridiths Addition. 59. Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Blossom Park Addition. 60. Lot 3, Block 1 Lyndale Oaks Addition. 61. Lot 7, Block 1 Anderson Ericksen Addition. 62. Lots 4 and 5 and the west half of Lot 3, Block 2 Lynwood Addition. 63. Lot 11, Block 4 D.L. Tater Addition. • 64. Tracts A and B of Registered Land Survey No. 1003. 65. Lot 1, Block 3 Harry Tickners Subdivision of Lot 15, Richfield Gardens. 66. The South 59.6 feet of the North 876.8 feet of the east .half of the west quarter of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of. Section 28 Township 28 Range 24. s 67. That part of the north half of the west 5 acres of southeast quarter of southwest quarter lying south of the north 349 feet of Section 33 Township 28 Range 24. 68. The north 124.5 feet of the west 140 feet of that part of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter lying east of the west 5 acres of Section 33 Township 28 Range 24. 69. The north 103 feet of the east 165 feet of the west 330 feet of the east half of the northeast quarter of the south- west quarter of Section 28 Township 28 Range 24. 70. The south 75 feet of the north 255 feet of that part of the west quarter of the north 10 acres of the south 20 acres of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter lying west of the east 154.48 feet of Section 34 Township 28 Range 24. 71. The north 105 feet of that part of the west quarter of the north 10 acres of the south 20 acres of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter lying west of the east 150.48 feet of Section 34 Township 28 Range 24. 72. The north 85 feet of the south third of the west eighth of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 27 Township 28 Range 24. -4- 73. Commencing at a point in the west line of Section 26 Township 28 Range 24 distant 771.435 feet from the northwe~ corner thereof thence east 289.34 feet thence south 75 feet thence west 289.34 thence north 75 feet to the point of 74. Thatnpar~~of the north 63.9 feet of the south 267.8 feet of the west half of the northwest quarter of the northwest. quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 35 Township 28 Range 24 lying"west of the east 153 feet thereof. 75. The east 161.4 feet of the west 325.3 feet of that part of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 35 Township 28 Range 24 lying south of the north 690 feet thereof and north of a line parallel with and 70 feet north from the north line of Zuberts Elliot Avenue Additiono 76. The west 163.9 feet of that part of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 35 Township 28 Range 24 lying south of the north 690 feet thereof and north of a line. parallel with and 70 feet north from the north line of Zuberts Elliot Avenue Addition. 77. That part of the south 82 feet of the north 112 feet of the west half of the east half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35 Township 28 Range 24 lying between the exten- sions of the east and west lines of Lot 1, Block 1 Elder Grove Fourth Addition. 78. The east 133 feet of the west 163 feet of that part of the . east quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 32 Township 28 Range 24 lying north of the south 1226.25 feet thereof. 79. The north 123 feet of the west 160 feet of the east 320 feet of the west half of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 34 Township 28 Range 24. 80. That part of the west 165 feet of the east 660 feet of the south third of the west three-quarters of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 27 Township 28 Range 24 lying south of the north 300 feet thereof. 81. The east 100 feet of the west 130 feet of the south 200 feet of Government Lot 5 Section 28 Township 28 Range 24. 82. That part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 35 Township 28 Range 24 lying between the north line of the south 130 feet thereof and the south lne of the north 109.6 feet thereof and west of the east 120 feet thereof. 83. The southerly 180.2 feet of the block lying between 65th and 66th Streets between Girard Avenue and Trunk Highway No. 65. 84. The north five acres of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 34 Township 28 Range 24 except the westerly 175 feet thereof. -5- Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1982. John Hama ton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk a . ~ ~ E . : - : 9 *. ! ~ t t 'd A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1 • ~NINOZ~~! I-~iW a a` s a` 8 ~~ t t i i i d iI6~IVIIR116~IIII~IR1 ~~~-dIIIIIV MII~IIIIAIIIIIIMI _' i ~~ IIIIIN~YVMfl II%Illpllilf'd~IRIIVRnllll In i,IIIIIVIIIIIpIIIIIIIVIIIIIIVYN RIIVIR~IVIfl1,INIIRIIIIIII il'li iii tilllli',IN~IIIIpIYI _ `~~Ipl~ ~i~Yl~l}Illlll~n _ III II IriniIIVII~~n11~I~INp'NLt~]~ 1111 II II III II~IIIIIIICIf9Nll NN11T~i (._ JIIIYIIiq'IIIItlKNIIYRpIIJIIiiNBlll ~ IIIIINNI~~IIIIIIIa~UN111N141~INJIIIIF ~ I~V~Wt~1~ II II 11'111111 II ~ ~!~11 II II tl i (S'd, ~II~II IIaIIIIVN~ i IFJIVN9~1 ' y ii it II i II Il~~y~ II I I ~~ ~,i!~ II I . I IL ll~ l~ II I=:i i~ it 1[ IIII I(~ ~ ~~ II(1[~L~~.;" •• IIII ~ n ~ 11 ll~ IK~k~I~II~II~N1i~~~1)Ilf If,;(1[' ~~~ ~~1~~~~~~~~~ ~JUI; ~l";~ -1r~ i~i`u i~y ,~; ~, ~~ ..~ t~1 ,,« ~~1[ ~~ l` ~~ ,~ o,~,~~e i ~/~ „ITV -Py-F'~ ~> ~~^ii k I. I N ~I fl I~ ~ ~II.~'lll fl11111V1 ~ouA n~IlYpr~VINI~1~ IIIV~hIMI~I~NIIIIVU`iP' ~4 fl A~ IN p ~ ~I~ IIIgINllll~llllllltil[ !l II IK! N~Ij II ~ II IgrYl I IIIIpViMi~iR~ ~i Y~~ uflR~~M~ ,,, --- a j i i ; ' 1 [ i i i ~ i i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i i ~ i ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C 0 ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ e a ~/S CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 23~? Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and r~lembers of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Fee Waived License There is an item on the July 26, 1982 city council agenda, requesting waiver of a residential kennel license fee. The request for waiver of this fee, submitted by Mr. Richard Burris, is attached. On April 12, 1982, the city council adopted quidelines for waiver of license fees. These guidelines provide that license fees may be waived under the following circumstances: 1. The establishment where the machine is located must be the party applying for the license. 2. Only groups that are religious, civic, benevolent, educational, verterans, or nonprofit will be considered for fee waived licenses. 3. Only license fees for which no inspectional services are required will be considered for fee waiver. 4. For licenses requiring background investigation, the cost of investigation may be substituted for the license fee if all other criteria are met. There is no provision in the city ordinance which provides that any sort of ;cennel license fee may be waived. A "residential kennel" is defined in city ordinance, and requires an inspection before the license may be issued. The residential kennel designation has been established because of the potential nuisance of a situation where several animals are present in a residential neighborhood. • Council Letter No. 238 -2- July 26, 1982 • There is similarly no characteristic of a residential kennel which fits the guidelines established by the city council for granting a fee waiver request. As noted, inspectional services are required for a residential kennel license, and the designation is purely for an individual, rather than a religious, nonprofit, etc. group. It is the opinion of the staff that there is no basis for waiver of a residential kennel license fee. If the city council wishes to pursue such, it will be necessary to change both the city ordinance requirement and the provision of the resolution establishing guidelines for waiver of a license fee. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ ce` L. Wilde Acting City Manager i JLW/skh cc: Public Safety City Clerk Administrative Director Services Director • • 7325 Fremont Ave. S. Richfield, Mn. 5523 July 13, 1982 City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Ave. S. Richfield, Mn. 5523 Dear Sir: Please put me on the agenda of the Richfield City Council on July 26, 1982. The issue I wish to ask the Council to take action on is a waiver of the Residential Kennel License fee. For many years, I have paid a small fee for a Residential Kennel License, although I thought this was an improper charge. Now that the fee has been increased to $40, however, • it has become a substantial matter financially as well as a matter of principle. I contend that Iab not have a "Residential Kennel". I have four cats. Period. My ownership of four cats has no relation- ship in any way to the operation of a kennel. There is no commercial aspect to this ownership. The Richfield form states that a Residential Kennel is "A place...where the keeping of such dogs or cats is incidental to the occupancy of the premises for residential purposes". Our pets are not some kind of a commercial side-line. They are not incidental to anything; they are integral to our family's life. The Richfield form, however, forces me to say that I"operate such business in accordance with the laws of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of Richfield.", even for a "Residential Kennel License." I will no longer sign this form without a test of its legality. Socially, this whole matter is ludicrous. Our pets are in no need whatsoever of City supervision. The City of Richfield will receive no complaints about our cats. Attached is a letter of support given to us voluntarily. by our neighbors, Marjorie and Albert Fournier. When there is no need for a City service, I hardly feel that I should be asked to pay for it. Let the City's services be ~se~~ved for those situations where they are requested. • I sincerely hope that the City Council will support my petition for waiver of this Residential Kennel Licence Fee. Thank you. Sincerely, ,~ - -- Richard Burtis 7329 Fremont Minneapolis, July 7, 192 City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Mn. 55.23 To Whom it may concern: Avenue South • ~. 55423 We have lived next door to the Richard Burtis family, 7325 Fremont Avenue South, for eleven years. They keep their cats confined to the house. The only time we are even aware that they have these pets is when Mr. Burtis comes annually to have us sign for his permit. We wish to protest the injustice of the fee required for them to keep these unobtrusive little animals within the confines of their home, and respectifully request that you review this case and substantially reduce the fee paid by these good and cooperative neighboors. Yours truly, ~ • ~~ c~~,ct~~~~r~~li ~~. Marjorie Fournier Albert Fournier ~o~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City 1`~~anager Council Letter No. 237 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor an d rlembers of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Traffic Signals at 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue A committee made up of business persons from the 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue area and city staff have been meeting periodically over the last six months in an effort to identify means to resolve the traffic and parking problems near the intersection of 76th Street .and Lyndale Avenue. The meetings have culminated in the following recommendations: 1. On-street parking should be prohibited on Lyndale Avenue between 74th and 76th Streets. (The council acted affirmatively on this recommendation at their July 12, 1932 meeting.) 2. A new signal should be constructed at the intersection of 76th and Lyndale. This new signal should be provided with mast arms to assure that the signal heads hang above the flow of traffic in a more highly visible location. 3. All parking should be eliminated within the 50-foot sight triangle at all four corners of the intersection, to allow for better visibility. As part of these deliberations, the committee has requested the HRA authorize a long range study of the 76th and Lyndale area from Nicollet Avenue to I-35Ta and from 74th Street to I-494.. Such a study would investigate both traffic and re- development in the area and would result in the preparation of a plan for the revitalization of this commercial area. A lone range study of the area would answer not only remaining traffic-related questions but would also address future re- development. • • • Council Letter No. 237 -2- July 26, 1982 The staff and the committee felt that, although an increased level of safety would be provided by installing medians to provide a left turn bay on Lyndale Avenue, there was a significant possibility that the traffic patterns in this area may change when new development occurs in the area. The decision was then made not to recommend construction of the median until the future of the area has been determined. It is the committee's recommendation instead that the council authorize installation of the signals at the intersection and implementation of parking restrictions within the 50-foot visibility triangle. The new signal would be financed with rlSA funds. It will be necessary to borrow a portion of the estimated $90,000 project cost against a portion of next year's $300,000 r~SA allotment. This project should not require a variance from the normal state aid procedures for the installation of signals. Although the design of the project will proceed immediately, there is generally a significant delay in the delivery of the electronic equipment needed for signal systems. If it appears that this delay will prevent construction of the signals during this construction season, the construction would occur next spring. The 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue businessmen's committee and the staff recommend that the council adopt the attached resolution which: 1. Orders the installation of new traffic signals at the intersection of 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue, and 2. Authorizes the as consultants system. retention of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron for preliminary design of the signal Respectfully submitted, ~ ' z~ ~c~ ~L . ~~lilde Acting City Manager JL~~/ skh cc: Community Development Director City Engineer • • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 76TH STREET AND LYNDALE AVENUE AND PREPARATION OF PLANS - CP 773 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it necessary to make the proposed improvements to the signal system at 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered 2. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. • Adopted by the city council of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of July, 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk • July 14, 1982 RICHFIELD CHAMBER of COMMERCE 7011 FIFTEENTH AVE. Sa. RICHFIELD. MINN. 55423 PHONE 866- 5100 ROBERT J. LIEN E%ECU TIVE SFCRETA R'I • Mr. Karl Nollenberger, City Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield MN 55423 Dear Karl: Our committee voted unanimously to support the new signals (with overhead extensions) with the delayed left hand turn at 76th Street and Lyndale Avenue South. This was a result of our discussion held in our meeting of July 13th. Sincerely, Tom Price, Chairman 76th Stree t Development Group Robert J. Lien Executive Secretary st V`+,~~ a r~~.~ I 1 • rams U3. CNAYlER OF CONYERCE Help "ENRICH" Richfield Through Your Chamber of Commerce ~ ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City ~~~anager Council Letter T`o. 236 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council t^embers Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to "Snowbirds" For several years, the city has actively encouraged citizens to cooperate in facilitating our snow removal efforts by moving vehicles off of public roadways until the snow is cleared. Articles encouraging this cooperation have been placed in brochures distributed to each residence, and flyers have been placed on windshields of vehicles still on the street during removal operations. However, we have continued to experience problems in snow removal due to cars parking on the streets. • During budget modification discussions earlier this year, the city council directed the staff to develop an ordinance amendment to deal with the "snowbird" problem. The cooperation method has not worked very well and the cost of returning for spot removal was expensive not only in additional equipment charges, but it meant staff was not free to work on other projects. The proposed ordinance would allow for stricter enforcement that could add to the revenue of the city, or, at least help lessen the cost of clean-up snow removal which is necessitated by snowbirds. The Community Services Advisory Commission has recommended that the city council approve the snowbird ordinance. It is recommended that the city council give first reading approval to the attached ordinance amendment, and schedule the public hearing and second reading consideration for August 9, 1982. This ordinance amendment would prohibit parking on public streets after a three-inch or more snowfall, until after the streets are cleared. If the ordinance is approved at that time, it would become effective prior to the 1982/1983 winter season, and allow for sufficient time to inform the public of the new regulations. ti+le would include notice of the new regulations in the Fall brochure, anticipated for distribution in September, and in the tiainter brochure, anticipated for distribution in early December. Ltiie would also • Council Letter No. 236 -2- July 26, 1932 anticipate notifying the public through inserts in the utility bills and by including announcements on cable television and in the newspapers. During the snow season, we would hope to have a telephone number that could be called to provide information on snow removal operations, including the time anticipated for start. Respectfully submitted, ~~~_~t ~ c-efL. Wilde Acting City Manager JLW/skh cc: Community Services Director • • AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER IX, . SECTION 9.02 AND 9.03 OF THE OP.DINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter IX, Sections 9.02 and 9.03 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield relating to the parking and stopping of vehicles on the public street is hereby amended in the following respects: I. By amending Section 9.02, Subdivision 11 thereof, to read as follows: "Subd. 11. Snow Removal. W~e~-the-~i~ee~e~-ef pebiie-we~ke-e~-ae~-e~-his-assis~a~~s-find-~~-eeeessa~~ few-the-pe~peses-ef-faeiii~ati~~-e~~ee~-~aie~esa~ee epe~a~iees;-seep-as-~~e-~e~e~ai-e~-eesw;-iee-e~-e~~eet ~as~es;-to-~e~e-amp-~e~ie~e-s~a~di~g-ee-amp-hi~~~ay-ie this-eity;-said-di~eete~-e~-pebiie-~e~ks-ems-his-assis~aets ie-~~e-diee~a~ge-ei-~kei~-defies-awe-ae~he~ised-~e-~e~e sseh-~ehieie-te-tie-e~~ee~-aeeessa~y-few-s~e~-g~~peses-" Subd. 11(1). Snow Removal. No person shall Park or leave standing any vehicle upon any public street or • highway in the City of Richfield after a snowfall of at least 3 inches. Parking may be resumed on such streets or highways after the snow has been removed or plowed to the curb lines. (2) In addition to the above, whenever the City Manager or his appointed representatives shall find it necessary for purposes of the safety and welfare of the community, or to facilitate any construction, maintenance, or repair of a street or highway in the City of Richfield, he shall be authorized to initiate and enforce necessary emergency procedures which could further restrict parking of ve is es on streets or ighways in the City. (3). The removal and disposal of vehicles so parked or left standing may be made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter IX of this Code." II. By amending Section 9.02, Subdivision 17 thereof, to read as follows: "Subd. 17. Tampering With Parked Vehicles. No person shall tamper with, molest, damage or set in motion any vehicle standing on any street or highway without the con- • sent of the owner or driver of such vehicle. Provided, however, that when the B}~ee~e~-e€-Pab~~e-Weeks City Manager or his representative finds it necessary, for purposes of facilitating street maintenance operations, to move any such vehicle, he may do so to the extent necessary to facilitate such operations." III. By amending Section 9.03, Subdivision 1, by adding the follow- ing new paragraph providing as follows: "(23). When any vehicle is parked or left stand on any public street or highway after a snowfall of a least 3 inches contrary to the provisions of Section 9.02, Subdivision 11, of this Code." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of 1982. Joseph Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: • Sylvia Bergh, Acting City Clerk • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ I Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 235 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Commission Appointments • There are currently three city commissions with membership vacancies as follows: Planning Commission There are two vacancies for unexpired three-year terms which will expire in January, 1983. These vacancies are the result of one member resigning due to a move out of the city, and the death of a second member. Attached to this council letter are applications from nine persons requesting appointment to this commission . Energy Commission There is one vacancy, due to resignation, for an unexpired three-year term which will expire July, 1984; there are also three expired terms for persons to serve to July, 1985. Attached are applications from Chrysanne Gross and Dorothy Hines . Senior Citizen/Handicapped Commission There is one vacancy, due to the death of a commission member, for an unexpired three-year term which will expire February, 1984. Attached are applications from Leonard Glock, Carolyn Dobis and Dorothy Hines. • Council Letter r?o. 235 -2- July 26, 1982 • This item has been scheduled on the July 26, 1982 city council agenda for council action. Prior to that council meeting, council members will have an opportunity to interview the applicants. A list of applicants and times is as follows: 5:45 5:50 5:55 6:00 6:05 6:10 6:15 6:20 6:25 6:30 6:35 6:40 6:45 p.m. Rosalie Bjorkman Barry Bloomgren Joseph Ertman Theresa Kassa Charles Kauth Barbara Kritzman Leon Lungs Steven Quam Kenneth Savageau Chrysanne Gross Dorothy Hines Carolyn Dobis Leonard Glock Planning Commission Planning Commission Planninq Commission Planning Commission Planninq Commission Planninq Commission Planninq Commission Planning Commission Planninq Commission Energy Commission Energy or Sr. Citizen/Handicpd Sr.. Citizen/Handicapped Com. Sr. Citizen/Handicapped Cam. Respectfully submitted, ,~ ~ L. ~ailde Acting City Manager • JLW/skh • Planning Commission - Two appointments, terms expiring 1/83 Applicants: Rosalie Bjorkman Barry Bloomgren Joseph Ertman Theresa Kassa Charles Kauth Barbara Kritzman Leon Lunas - Steven Quam Kenneth Savageau Appointed: ~- ~_ , ~ - ~ , Energy Commission - Four vacancies - 1 expire 7/84; 3 expire 7/85 Applicants: ~- Chrysanne Gross Dorothy Hines z, ~_J ,, _ Senior Citizens/Handicapped - one vacancy - term expires 2/84 Applicants• Dorothy Hines Carolyn Dobis Leonard Glock Appointed: Da to • • APPLICATION FOR CIT'.' OF RiCHF~'LD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COP.iMISSION APPOII~ITME::T NAME Last -first ~.i_~...~ HOME ADDRESS Street No. City Zip Ccde ~1AIT I^:G ADDRESS (if different from home addressi Street No. Ci~r ~:s Code PHONE: Home ~ - Business APPCINTti1ENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission- Human. Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of t-Iealth Advisory Commission Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission; commit*_ee and why ;you are .nterested in serving: CIVIC , PROFESSIOPv'AL AND CCMML'}~ ITY ACTI`JITiES: ~. • • • • D~j to 1-1.-52 APFLIC';TION :- CR. CiT`~ CF RIC:I'IELD AD`JISORY CCM.'~~IITTEE OR COPi'~IISSIOI: AP~OII~-T1,'E NAME Blo^r.~rer_ Barr: 'Palter Last ir._~ ..,_..`ie HOME ADDRESS 6220 :Newton Aver_ue South, R.ichiiel3 Street ?~'o. City MAILING ADDRESS (if :.'ifferent :rom home adcrzss; Street NG. PHCi~:E: Home 866-7818 APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: ~=r;' 55123 ~i: ~ .,~e Business 318-3939 P1ar.ning Commission 2 Park and Recreation Advisory Comm . 1 Senior Citizen & Hard capped Advisory CGmmission Human RiyhtS CO^;^"'.1SS1Gi"i Ci~.~i1 Service Cor::missiGn~_ Advisory Board of ?ieaith Other Briefly discuss aspects of your exaerier,ce ~~.~hicll you believe qualify you iGr this municipal commission,"commit*_ee and -.vhy ~.~ou are interested ~n ser•.~~^g: See attached sheet CPIIC, PROFESSIONAL AND C'OP~1ti1L'r:-IT'i ACTI~'iTIES: Richfield Youth Co-nrlission 1~7G, R.i.chfield Ice Arena Ad~ri_sorv Com*r~ittee 1°7C?-71 , P1Ch21el: ~.IiOCIeV SSn. C03C:7 - ~ 'y'ears, R1Ci'lf'iel: :~~en's SOftCall, Cal! GroY-e LUtr!er~r: ~il?urC~1, :•.1rlr:. "3'^i~;J SU~DOrt aY"a ReCOVer?T CO'1'1Ci 1 BOard 0~ Di roCtOT'S, i•.i"?:'1, aIP.ll~' JUDL~Ort 3:?C1 ~COVer~r C0~.1T1C11 Le?islative COi!lI:?lttee Date June 25, 1982 • APPLICATION FOR CIT': OF RIO:-IF~LD ADVISOR`S' COMMITTEE OR COP~iMISSION APPOINTiyiE?~I^' NA.~1E ERTP~IAN JOSEPH E Last . first '.i:...:i~ HOME ADDRESS 7533 Third Avenue So. , Richfield 55423 Street No. City Zip Cede MAILING ADDRESS (if different from ho~.~e address) • Street No. Cit~,~ Zio Code PHOtiE: Home 861-2803 Business 370-2164 APPCINTivtENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission X Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission I-Iuman Rights Commission Civil Service Commission_ Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualif}~ you for this municipal commission commit*_ee and why ~,~ou are Interested in ser~~~~ng: Served as a member of Commission for 7 years (last 4 years as chairman) CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND CCMML'~TITY ACTIVITIES: East Richfield Little League Midwest Pension Conference • ~~ Date ~ ,~~ ' i - ~ - • APPLICATION FOR CIT'C CF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR CO"~`IMISSION APPOII~IT;~IENT ~~ NAME - ~.. ~ i ~~, f" - _ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~'~ . 1 Last first ~ ,.._..uie -, HOME ADDRESS -~ =,~ _ ~(1-~-- .~1 ~,l 1~ ~_~ l 4-l c. ~i I ~-, --t . `~ Street No. ~ City Zip Code MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street ~Io. City iJ ilJ li:G ~J APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Rio Code Planning Commission ~ -~ z-Iuman Rights Commission .~ ~~ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm.~~ Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & I-~and~cappe,d Advisory Board of Healtt: Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~•~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commissionjcommit*_ee and why }you are Interested in serving: _. - ,_ - ~ ~ ; ~~ - _ ~ ~ ~ } .i ! /l /' .,..rte I ~i i /. / ' / - _ ~ / - r - J ~- - ~ / / ~ CIVIC, PR~FESSIONALAND COMMU~~ITYACTIVITIES: .. ~ , _ - - ~ ~ __ • Date December 21, 1940 • APPLICATION FOR CIT'i OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME_ Kauth Charles Ta~.oG Last First ~ Pvii~~ie HOME ADDRESS 7321 Mortar. ave. So. Pichfieid,:~iinnescta 55G23 - Street No. City Zip Cede h1AILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home gEQ_E010 Business g6~_~^ 1 ~ F.xt. X13 aPPCINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission 2 Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm.~_ Civil Service Commission: 1 Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience :~~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/committee and why you are interested in serving: I am interested in the future of kichfieldl Having lived here over 20 years I would welcome an oppcrtunity to contribute something wort'~while to +he on-go;ng well Being of our co:;mur,ity. Fast experience while serving wits various committees and groups has served to stimulate my interest in offering, for your consideration,, an open.mi;,d, and a willingness to study and evalute programs, plans and problems which will affect the residents of Pichfield, Goth new and in the future. The opportunity ~o work together with other interested residents; to allot time for proper study, discussion and evaluation and to reach decisions for the well being of the cornrrunity as a whole, would be satisfying to me. CPIIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: F i ~~ o~ a `1' >c~ne1G .';r~r. ; ~ i.1r.i rr. ~ Board of Directors, N?em~er 1972-80 President, 1975-80 I:ichfield Fu'c1i^ Sc!:ocis Ir,s~.rar.^e Ccmm~ttee~}~?2-7G C t'7 0~ F.CL,f`,Plr`, T~•..~.....f P-rr.yp ~ PA•~;c'.J ,('?!'Rlt.fPP (', }^a~mpn lQ'7~='7 ,. - f ! ~ • ,~:e:~.ber of numerous lccai and state educational ccmmittees durir,~ the :;ast 20 nears. Date ~' r ~- APPLICATION FOR CIT'i OF RICHFIELD • ADVISORY COMMITTEE O/R COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME ~~2- l T ~ NI ~ ~ ~j~-,E='~~~°,~ Last r /' / First / ~ til~di;ie HOME ADDRESS ~~IC~T /"~ ./~~'~"~ ~-~,~~°~o ~~Cf_Tre ~c~ -~ 5 ~i~~= Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. City Zio Code PHONE: Home g~~ G - ~ /~ ~9 Business ~ ~ 3 - ~ I/ APPCINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission ~ Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. ~ Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~~~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/commit*_ee and why ;you are interested in serving: G , ~ -u-ate / ~i CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMU~IITYACTIVITIES: _ ~ ~/ -, _ ~ ,. ~ ~'--i . ~, y ~ .`"till---.-..~ ~? ir_~-2 /; ~~ `~~~~--~ ~ , ~ r~ ~_,C•,~. ~~ y~, v-<~ ~• fl e ~~ "' ~J ~ ~ i G~~~-~~ ~~t,-+~~-'-'~ ~~i~~--!' , Date 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;~ ~~_ APPLICATION FOR CIT.':' OF RICHFIELD • ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COP~'iMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME .- wti~~ ~ / ~ u ~t,f , Last ~ first ,...~~ie ~ ~ HOME ADDRESS ~~J U ~ `~ ~:, .y-.~t,' ~ ~ Z.'~ ^-~~' c~ ~ C ~ L ? Street No. Cit;~ Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. Cit}~ Zip Code PHONE: Home ~ ~. ~~-. _ ~ ~ J ~ Business ~~ ~ % -Gr-~~c., ~; APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission~_ Park and Recreation Advisory Comm._ Senior Citizen & Hand~cappe.d Advisory Commission Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission Advisory Board of Tlealttl .~ r ~ I Other /~f~1 ~n1_ i ~,tc ~~ ! u ~~ y ~ ~ ~~~ Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission commit*_ee and why }you are Interested in serving: `~ G n.° C .~ ~ _ ~ ~ I v ~ ( ~/ ~ I} i~. o. ~ T- ~ .ter ~ ~ / ! ~. ! ~ I CIVIC , PROFESSIONAL AND CCMML'~1ITY iaCTIVITIES: r-- .~ ~ r; ~ Date June 24 , 1982 APPLICATION FOR CIT'.' CF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE CR COt~~MISSION APPOII~ITME.IT NAIvIE Quam Steven John Last : first , ..~~ie HOME ADDRESS 6421 James Avenue So. Richfield 55423 Street No. City Zia Code ti1A:~ItiG ADDRESS (if different from 'r.o~;~e address) Street No. Cit~..~ Zip Code PHC:v~: Ho~Te 861-2601 ^~~- 332-5100 JUJ1ne~J APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission X Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission • Human Rights Commission Civil Service Commission Advisory Board of Health Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience «~hich you believe qualify you for this m~.:nicipal commissioni~commit*_ee and why ;you are interested in serving: I have been a homeowner, parent, neighbor, and church member in Richfield for six years. I appreciate the efforts that have been made -for-its planned deve opmerit arid-improvement within ~e context o its existing neighborhood and community atmosphere and caould like an oppor- uni y o e p, am an attorney wit seven years experience, includ- ing practice in residential and business real estate, construction, liens and bonding, and small business. CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND CCP~IMli~'ITY ACTIVITiLS: Member, past secretary and commission member of t~oodlake Lutheran Church. Attorney for ~~oodlake Children's Center, Member Hennepin County and Minnesota State Bar Association, (including Real Droperty and Tax • Law Sections) , ~~Iember Do~,entown rZinneapolis Lions' Club Date ~ -_ - __ ~ _- APPLICATION FOR CIT'C OF RICHF~LD ADVISORY COMMITTEE CR COMMISSION APPOINTMEi~:T NAME --- _ --- ' _ ,---- _- - (_- ~- ~ _. Last first ~ .~~i:~~ie HOh~1E ADDRESS _ -~ ~T ~': ~, ~,~'~ -i -__ ~ -::- -~<t^_ Street No. City Zip Ccde MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Street No. Cit,~ Zip Ccde PHONE: Home ~~~~`~`~' Business `'~~~° APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission -- - -, r -": Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service C~mm1SSlOn Senior Citizen & Hand~cappe,d Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission, Other • Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commissioni~commit*_ee and why ;you are Interested in ser•~~ng: CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMML't1ITY ACTIVITIES: - __ - -- ,. -. -~.-~r r _ .. ~-_ - }-~ -_ / ~.' 1 Date ,~ ., ~ APPLICATION FOR CIT':' OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTME"dT ~- 1 Last first ..._..:,i~ - ~ ~ r _ _ HOME ADDRESS ~ ~l.`i '~rri~^~1,.~/~t~~~~, f\,~A~~i„i ~~~/ Street No. City Zip Ccde i~1AILING ADDRESS (if different from ho:,:e address' =~ ;~ ,: , Street No. Cit~;• yip C~d2 PHONE: Home ~~ (~ ~ - `~ ~ Jr Business ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ APPOIi~Ti~~tENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board o. ?-Iealth Advisory Commission Other _h~;-~ _ ~,crrJ,n,-~~;;~~~ Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~a~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/commit*_ee and why you are Interested in serving: _ _ ~ / , i „t ~ i .1 ~~ C .:~ g ;~5 ~`h~t-_~~ /~, ~i~l~'_`.~~ l ~~ 1`',.~r~'r_~y Y'~, '~?~t~.-1~1 - - / ~ ~ -a-. / / ~ _ ~'J ~ ~.^~ `" ~ ~~ ,~~~ CiT ~: ii.,~~'~`~ J .,)1,jC%i'~ ~' i`~ Ci'~ -1^i~JC'.~ ~ +" ~~ . CIVIC, PROFESSIO NAL AND CCMMU~TI'I`4'A CTIVITIES; i f-~ ~ ~ , Date _ - '1: ~ _ _'_ • APPLICATION FOR CIT7 OF nICHF s LD ADVISORY COMLIITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOII~1TMEi~T NAME H ~~~~~~ ~ D j'n i~-/ / ,~?. Last first ~ ,~,,_...:i~ HOME ADDRESS ~_~-~ _i~hi/)„% ,_. ~1` ~ ~~!~='~~,,'~.-1~~ -~`;--~~_`.~ Street No. City Zip Cede MAIL I:'~G ADDRESS !if different from home addressi Street No. Cic';~ Zip Code PHONE: Home - ~ - - ~ 3usir.ess " _ ' - i/_= APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: * Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission * Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission .== * Other Energy *These commissions have immediate openings. Briefly discuss aspects of your experience ~~~hich you believe qualify you for this municipal commissionicommit*_ee and why :you are interested in serving: CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND CCMML"~7ITY ACTIVITIES: - - - - - ~ / / ~ -_J~; • Date APPLICATION FOR CIT`i OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION APPOINTMENT NAME Last HOME ADDRESS ~!_%1~; Street No. Fifst % ~_~ f ~ ~~ City MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address) Li ~~~ ie ;.~~: -- Zip Ccde Street No. City Zip Code PHONE: Home ; '; jy ~~~ / ~~ y` Business -~ ~ i `~ ( j APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Planning Commission Human Rights Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm. Civil Service Commission Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Board of Health Advisory Commission ~ Other Briefly discuss aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this municipal commission/commit*.ee and why ;you are Interested in serving: CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: • D~~te /' 9 _ ~~/ APPLIC~AT?'~"~; `~OR CIT•' C'~F RIC.HF'IEL~; ADVISORY COM:.IITTEE CGR COP'~'~~`ISSION P.P~~~iI~T~'r NAME ~~-~~ ~ ~ ~'~'t'.bh ~ ~:~i i,aSt in .......___ `~/ NOME ADDRESS ~ rIG~~ :~~,~~ ~~W~ CZ.i-t' fir. ~.~ ~~t. -ucd' ~~~ Street No. ~'it~, ~ Zip _ ~~e • MAILING ADDRESS (if different ~rcm home a~drzss; ~:i7ru-~ Street No. -- - _~..~ PHONE: H~me G~ L~ 75~::--/ Business .=,PPCINTMENT °REFEP.E:~C'E: Planning Commission Park and Recreation Advisory Comm . Senior Citizen & Handicapped Advisory Commission_~ Human Rights C~~mmis~ior. ~_~.~i1 Service C'~mmission Advisory Board of Heaitr. Other Briefly d1SCllSs aSpeCtS Of your eXperienCe ': :'r1Ch you hel1P`.~e ~llaliTy yOll IBC th1S municipal commissions committee and ~.vhy ~. ou are Interested in ser~.~:^c: l.a ~; x arc '.~1_ t~ % ~ ~ Lr-~~` ,~ ' i ~~il ~_ ' _ i ~"' ~. ,~~" - - 7 ~ ~ ,. "^~'~. Vii, _ ~i"`°!. _ _~r .,Y T= 7~' /<~.. ~~. t t/_ ~ C_' :'+!ft~/-'/~ 7L: r:~ ~<~~G':~ ! it ~. J`' .v- !~F-.. .~.. il,~~ ~,!.C~ ~. Il' [-; ~.~ .r~ ~~ ...w ! ~ i ~- Imo. ' s! - ~~~. /' ! ~~ .i- ., , l f ! L ! _; i..i-1.-,f.' , ` } ~ C'. '.'W~ _ ~ ~' ._ ~~" - CIVIC, PRCFESSIONA~ AND COr~1:~1L''_'~?T' .~CTI`'J"'IES: ~ ~ - - - r,~.:. i . . $~ °Z- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City manager Council Letter No. 234 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council rZembers Subject: i~iiss Richfield Presentation The six participants in the City of Richfield's 4th of July Miss Richfield event will be present at the July 26, 1982 city council meeting. The council has requested that they be present in order for the council to publicly recognize and thank them for their participation. The participants are as follows: Debbie Klopp, rliss Richfield; Anne Skwira; Pam Koob; Kris Knutson; Brenda Butterfield; and Barb Dallager. There will also be tokens of appreciation available at the council meeting to be given to each of these young ladies. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~ ~~ Karl Nollenbercrer City Manager KN/skh ~/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, .MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 233 Agenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable D4ayor and r•~embers of the City Council City of Richfield Council 1`~embers Subject: Life Saving Honor Presentation to Girl Scout Mrs. Mary A"arks, of Girl Scout Trcop #69, has requested that an item be placed on the July 26, 19Fi2 city council agenda for presentation of a Life Saving Honor Award to Michelle Nlorrissette. Michelle, at the age of seven, made the necessary calls for medical help when her father was taken ill at home. Mrs. Marks and members of the Girl Scout Council will be present at the July 26, 1982 city council meeting to make this presentation to Dichelle. Respectfully submitted, ~~,~~.~~c~~~~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/skh • .~ /d CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 232 Agenda July 26, 192 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to the Sale of Drug Paraphernalia. Second Reading. At the June 23, 192 city council meeting, the city council gave first reading approval to an ordinance amendment prohibiting the sale of drug paraphernalia in the City of Richfield. State legislation prohibiting this sale will become effective August 1, 192. However, the cities of Minneapolis and Bloomington have both enacted ordinances prohibiting the sales of drug paraphernalia which are more restrictive or specific in language than the statute which will become effective August 1. Although there are presently no establishments within the City of Richfield which are engaged in the sale of drug paraphernalia, the public safety director is concerned that the local ordinances passed in Minneapolis and Bloomington may encourage dealers to establish their business in our community. Therefore, this ordinance amendment, which is similar to those of Minneapolis and Bloomington, has been developed. The public hearing for this ordinance amendment, a copy of which is attached to this council letter, has been scheduled for the July 26, 19f~2 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, ',,~' Karl Nollenberger City 1`Tanaaer KN/skh cc: Public Safety Director AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER X, PART III OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter X, Part III of the Ordinance Code prohibiting certain types of conduct as misdemeanors is hereby amended by~ adding the following new section: "10.26 MISDEP~IEANORS - DRUG PARAPHERNALIA. Subd. 1. Definitions. The following words and terms when used in this section shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:' (1) Drug paraphernalia means all equip- ment, products and materials of any land which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in planting, propagating, cultivat- ing, converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body, a controlled substance in violation of state statute or this code. The definition includes, but is not limited to: (A) kits used, intended for use, or de- signed for use in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, or harvesting of any species of plant which is a controlled sub- stance or from which a controlled substance can be derived; (B) kits used, intended for use, or designed for use in manufacturing, compound- ing, converting, producing, processing, or preparing controlled substances; (C) isomerization devices used, intend- ed for use, or designed for use in increasing the potency of any species of plant which is a controlled substance; (D) testing equipment used, intended for use, or designed for use in identifying or in analyzing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of controlled substances; (E) scales and balances used, intended for use, or designed for use in weighing or measuring controlled substances; (F) diluents and adulterants, such as quinine hydrochloride, mannitol, marinite, dextrose, and lactose, used, intended for _. __ use, or designed for use in cutting control- led substances; (G) separation gins and sifters used, - ~- == - - intended for= use, --or-designed for"use. .n ~~'.-~-~ - removing twigs and seeds from, or in other- wise cleaning or refining, marijuana; (H) blenders, bowls, containers, spoons, and mixing devices. _.used,_intended for use, or designed for use in compounding controlled substances; (I) capsules, balloons, envelopes, and other containers used, intended for use, or designed for use in packaging small quantities of controlled substances; (J) containers and other objects used, intended for use, or designed for-use in storing or concealing controlled substances; (K) hypodermic syringes, needles, and • other objects used, intended for use, or designed far use in parenterally injected controlled substances into the human body; (L) objects used, intended for use, or designed for use in ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing marijuana, cocaine, hashish, or hashish oil into the human body, such aso (1) Metal, wooden, acrylic, glass, stone, plastic, or ceramic pipes with or without screens, permanent screens, hashish heads, or punctured metal bowls; (2) water pipes; (3) carburation tubes and devices; (4) smoking and carburation masks; (5) roach clips, meaning objects used to hold burning material such as a marijuana cigarette which has become too small or too short to be held in the hand; (6) miniature cocaine spoons and cocaine vials; (7) chamber pipes; • (8) carburetor pipes; (9) electric pipes; (10) air-driven pipes; (11) chillums; -: (12) bongs; _ _ .:..._ : - (13) ice pipes or chillers. Subd. 2. Evidenee.~ In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, a court or other authority should consider, in addition to all other logically relevant factors, the following: (1) Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use; (2) prior convictions, if any, of an owner or anyone in control of the object under state or federal law relating to any • controlled substance; (3) the proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of the controlled substance laws; (4) the proximity of the object to con- trolled substances; (5) the existence of any residue of controlled substances on the object; (6) direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner or anyone in control of the object to deliver it to persons who the owner or person in control knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to facilitate a violation of this section or of the controlled substance laws. The innocence of an owner or anyone in control of the object as to a direct violation of the controlled substance laws should not prevent a finding that the object is intended for use or designed for use as drug paraphernalia; (7) instructions, oral or written, pro- • vided with the object concerning its use; (8) descriptive materials accompanying • the object which explain or depict its use; (9) national and local advertising con- cerning its use; (10) the manner in which the object is displayed for sale; (11) whether the owner or anyone in control of the object is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products; (12) direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object(s) to the total sales of the business enterprise; (13) the existence and scope of legit- imate uses for the object in the community; use. (14) expert testimony concerning its Subd. 3. Offenses. (1) Possession. It is a misdemeanor for • any person to use, or possess with intent. to use, drug paraphernalia to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, com- pound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject., ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance in violation of this ordinance or state law. (2) Manufacture or Deliver It is a misdemeanor for any person to deliver, possess with intent to deliver, or manufacture with intent to deliver, drug paraphernalia knowing or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that it will be used to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manu- facture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body, a controlled substance in violation of this ordinance or state law. ((3) Advertisement. It is a misdemanor • for any person to place in any newspaper, magazine, handbill, or other publication, any advertisement knowing or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that the purpose of the advertisement, in whole or in part, is designed on intended for use as drug paraphernalia. Subd. 4. Civil Forfeiture. All drug paraphernalia as defined in this section are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1982, Section 152.19, Subdivisions 2 and 4, in the same manner as if said forfeitures were pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1982, Chapter 152. Subd. 5. Severability. If any provision of this section or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this section which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this section are severable. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 1982. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk • ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 231 Aqenda July 26, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and P7embers of the City Council City of Richfield Council r~~embers Subject: Transitory Ordinance Appropriating Monies From the Special Revenue Fund to the Public Safety Building Project. Second Reading. At the June 28, 1982 city council meeting, the city council gave first reading approval to a transitory ordinance appropriat- ing $7,850.19 to the public safety building project. The monies being appropriated were previously allocated, but unspent, far the L/H/N civic plaza project and the Sheridan Park project. Unspent Special Revenue Funds are returned to the Special Revenue Fund and are available for reallocation for other • purposes. Addition of these funds to the public safety building project will permit completion of landscaping and finishing exterior work around the new public safety building addition. This item has been scheduled for second readincr considera- tion at the July 26, 1982 city council meeting. A copy of the proposed transitory ordinance is attached to this council letter. Respectfully submitted, ~r~(~ Karl ~?ollenberger City t°anager KL1/skh • • TRANSITORY ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of Richfield Does Ordain; Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making of Capital Improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, for which the City would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures for such improvements which are authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, Subd. 2 of the City Charter, are as follows: Public Safety Building $7,850.19 Section 3: The expenditure herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council action. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this . day of John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 230 Agenda July 26 , 19F~2 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Amending Section 2.07 of the City Charter Relating to Council Salaries. Second Reading. At the June 14, 19~i2 city council meeting, first reading approval was given to an ordinance amending Section 2.07 of the city charter relating to salary increases for council members. The amendment would delete the phrase "and such ordinances nay be amended only by a four-fifths vote of the council" and add the phrase "No change in salary shall take effect until after the next succeeding municipal election." The current state law allows a change in salary to take place upon a majority vote of the city council effective after the councilmember stands for election. An alternate procedure is the Home Rule Charter which allows a salary change to take place 30 days after publication of the ordinance when a four- fifths vote of the council takes place. The charter amendment would bring the Home Rule Charter into the same language as the state law and prevent any salary increases prior to standing for election. A public hearing on this amendment, a copy of which is attached, has been scheduled for the July 26, 1942 city council meeting. Approval of the ordinance requires a unanimous vote of the city council. Respectfully submitted, ;/ r r~ Karl Nollenberaer City Manaaer KN/skh • TRANSMITTAL ORDER To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: We, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting members of the Charter Commission of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, do hereby respectfully submit and deliver to you the attached proposed ordinance amending Section .~.' of the City Charter of the City of Richfield. We hereby respectfully proposed, recommend and submit for adoption, by unanimous vote of the City Council and approval by the Mayor of the ..:- . City, the attached proposed ordinance this ~~ day of / ~ ' n /// • i ~ ~i ~ J ji _ ~,,~ 4 ,. .. .,_ .L_w_. CHARTER AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CHARTER OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: The City Charter of the City of Richfield adopted November 3, 1964, as subsequently amended, is hereby amended in the following respect: Section 2.07, relating to the salaries of the mayor and members of the council is amended to read: "Sec. 2.07. Salaries. The mayor and the members of the council shall receive payment as set by ordinance [and such ordinance may. be amended only by a four-fifths vote of the council]. No change in salary shall take effect until after the next succeeding municipal election. The city manager and all subordinate officers • and employees of the City shall. receive such salaries or wages as may be fixed by the council." This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication in the manner required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, by unanimous vote this day of 1980. Mayor ATTEST: City Cler • LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER. PEARSON, O BRIEN & DRAWZ CLAYTON L. LEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DEN NIS O~BRI.EN JOHN E. DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLENN E. PURDUE JAMES O. LARSON CHARLES L. LEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER III JEFFREY J. STRAND JAMES P. O'M EARA MARY J. BJORKLUND THOMAS D. CREIG HTON 1100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 20, 1979 Mr. Karl Nollenberger City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Re: Change of Council Salaries Dear Mr. Nollenberger:_ I~ '*~ J '4f r~ov 2~ ~9» '~ L ~ ~~e~~i~~~ Lliy P~t~~~~~,~=~ TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 6Ve have been requested to respond to several questions which have been asked about the procedural requirements which are applicable to changes in council salaries. Section 2.07 of the city charter provides as follows: "Salaries. The mayor and the members of the council shall receive payment as set by ordinance and such ordinance may be amended only by a four- fifths vote of the council. The city manager. and all subordinate officers and employees of the city shall receive such salaries or wages as may be fixed by the council." In the absence of any statutory provisions, it would be possible to change the salaries of the mayor and the other members of the council only by an ordinance adopted by four-fifths vote of the council. The charter provision does not contain any limitation on when the change becomes effective. It appears that the only limitation is that the change could not be effective before the ordinance (or an amendment of the ordinance) itself became effective. From time to time the city council has amended the salary ordinance and made the amendment effective upon publica- tion. After the adoption of the Richfield city charter, the legisla- ture passed the following legislation relating to council salaries: "415.11 CITIES OF SECOND, THIRD AND FOUP,TH CLASS, SALARIES OF GOVERNIPIG BODY. Subdivision 1. Not- withstanding the provisions of any general or special law, charter, or ordinance, the governing body of any statutory or home rule charter city of the second, LAW OFFICES LeFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Mr. Karl Nollenberger November 20, 1979 Page 2 third or fourth class may by ordinance fix their own salaries as members of such governing body, and the salary of the chief elected executive officer of such city, in such amount as they deem reasonable. Subd. 2. No change in salary shall take effect until after the next succeeding municipal election." It is our opinion that the provisions of §415.11 provide an independent alternative method of fixing council salaries. If the council proceeds under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes X415.11, it is our opinion that the salary change could not take effect until after the next succeeding municipal election. If the council undertakes to proceed under X415.11, rather than under charter section 2.07, it is our opinion that the require- ment of a four-fifths vote does not apply, and the salary amend- ment ordinance (which would be delayed in its effect until after the next municipal election) would require three favorable votes to pass. Very truly yours, ,~ , Clayton~L. LeFevere CLL:jpf ___ ___ ~s CITY OF RICHFIELD, iTINT'ESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter ?~?o. 229 Agenda July 26, 19"2 The Honorable Mayor and r~e*nbers of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Amendment Amending Section 5.01-5.20 of the City Charter Relating to Initiative and Referendum, and Including Recall. Second Reading. At the June 14, 1982 city council meeting, the city council Qave first reading approval to amendment of Section 5.01-5.20 of the city charter, and scheduled the public hearing for July 26, 1982. Specifically, these amer~drnents include: amending Chapter • S, Section 5,01 relating to Initiative and Referendum to include "Recall." Sections 5.14 through 5.20 are new sections relating to the procedures for recall. Copies of the proposed charter amendments are attached to this council letter. Approval of the ordinance requires a unanimous vote in favor by council members. Respectfully submitted, ~~ r Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/skh • TRANSMITTAL ORDER To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: We, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting members of the Charter Commission of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, do hereby respectfully submit and deliver to you the attached proposed ordinance amending Section S r, ' - " • ~ ~`of the City Charter of the City of Richfield. We hereby respectfully proposed, recommend and submit for adoption, by unanimous vote of the City Council and approval by the Mayor of the . ~, City, the attached proposed ordinance this day of 19` :-. - y /: i ..~ . •_!/~ ~'; rte, ~:{ f ,`, .. ~ L-., ,_ ~. ~~ // /. CHARTER AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. CHARTER AMENDMENT ORDINANCE RELATING TO RECALL OF ELECTED PUBLIC OFFICERS OF THE CITY, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CHARTER CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: The City Charter of the City of Richfield is hereby amended as follows: (1) The title of Chapter 5 is amended to read; "Initiative axe, Referendum and Recall" (2) Sec. 5.01 is amended to read: "Powers reserved by the people. The people of Richfield reserve to themselves the powers, in accordance with the provi- sions of this charter, to initiate and adopt any ordinance, except an ordinance appropriating the money or authorizing the levy of taxes, to request such an ordinance when. passed by the council to be referred to the registered voters for approval or disapproval and to recall elected ublic officials. These powers shall be called the initiative aad, referendum and recall, respectively.. (3) Sec. 5.02 is amended to read: "Expenditures by petitioners. No member of any initiative, ~• e~ referendum, or recall committee, no circulator of a signature paper, and no signer of any such paper, or any other person, shall accept or offer any reward, pecuniary or otherwise, for service rendered in connection with the circulation thereof, but this shall not prevent the committee from paying for legal advice and from incurring an expense not to exceed $200.00 for station- ery, copying, printing, and notarial fees. Any violation of the provisions of this section is a misdemeanor. (4) Sec. 5.03 is amended to read: "Further regulations. The council may provide by ordinance such further regulations for the initiative, e~ referendum or recall, not consistent with this charter, as it deems necessary. (5) The following new paragraphs shall be added after Section 5.13: s "Sec. 5.14. The Recall. No less than 25 registered voters may form themselves in a committee for the ur ose of brin inq • about the recall of anv council member including the mayor. If the committee seeks the recall of a district council member, the the registered voters constituting the committee shall be from the council member's district. The committee shall certify to the city clerk the name of the council member whose removal is sought, a statement of the grounds for removal in not more than 250 words, and their intention to brin about his or her recall. A copy of this certificate shall be attached to each signature paper and no signature paper shall be put into circulation pre- vious to such certification. The grounds as set forth in the recall etition must be predicated on one or more charges of malfeasance, nonfeasance or both. For this purpose the word "malfeasance" means the perfor- mance of an act by a council member in his or her official ca~a- city that is wholly illegal and wron ful and the word "nonfea- sance" means the neglect or refusal, without sufficient excuse, to do that which it is the council member's legal duty to do. "Sec. 5.15. Recall Petitions. The petition for the recall of any council member shall consist of a certificate identical to that filed with the city clerk to ether with all the signature papers and affidavits thereto attached. All the signatures need not be on one signature pa er, but the circulator of every paper shall make an affidavit that each si ature appended to the paper is the genuine signature of the erson whose name it purports to be. Each signature paper shall be in substantially the following form: ~ RECALL PETITION proposing the recall of office as which recall is sought for the reasons set forth in the attached certificate. This movement is sponsored by the following commit- ~~ tee of registered voters eligible to vote on candidates for that office. Name Address 1. 2. 3. The undersigned re istered voters, all being eligible to vote on candidates for that office, understanding the nature o the charges against the council member herein sought to be reca ed, desire the holding of a recall election for that purpose. Name Address 1. 2 3. -2- At the end of the list of si natures shall be ap ended the affi davit of the circulator. ".Sec. 5.16. Filing of Petition. within 30 days after the filin of the on anal certificate the committee shall file the completed petition in the office of the city clerk The city _clerk shall examine the petition within the next five days, and if the clerk fends it irregular in any way, or finds that the number of si Hers is less than 25 percent of the total number of registered voters eligs,ble to vote on candidates for that office at the last preceding regular municipal election, the city clerk shall so notify one or more members of the committee The com mittee shall then be given ten days in which to file additional signature papers and to correct the petition in all other respects, but they may not change the statement of the grounds _upon which the recall is sought.. If at the end of that time the city clerk finds the petition still insufficient or irregular, the clerk shall notify all the members of the committee to that effect and shall file the petition ~.n the city clerk's office No further action shall be taken thereon. "Sec. 5.17. Recall Election. If the petition or amended petition is found sufficient, the city clerk shall transmit it to the council without delay, and shall also officially notify the person sought to be recalled of the sufficiency of the petition and of the pending action. If the council member sought to be recalled does not resign within ten days after Navin been iven such notice, the council shall, at its next meetin occurin more ___. than ten days after the 'receipt by the council of the recall petition, by resolution, provide for the holding of a special recall electron not less than 30 nor more than 45-days after such meeting, but Zf any other election is to occur within 60 days after such meeta.ng, the council may in its discretion provide for the holding of the recall election ~t treat time If the special recall election involves a district council member, the recall election shall be conducted only within the district of such council member. If it involves several district council members, the election shall be conducted only within the districts of such council members. If it involves a council member who is elected at large, the election shall be a city-wide election "Sec. 5.18. Procedure at Recall Election The city clerk shall include with the ublished notice of the election the statement of the grounds for recall and also, in not more than 500 words, the answer of the council member concerned in justifi- cation of his or her course in office. The election shall be conducted as far as possible, in accordance with the usual proce- dure in municipal elections. "Sec. 5.19. Form of Recall Ballot. The form of the ballot at such election shall be as near as may be: "Shall be recalled?" The name of the council member whose recall is sought and his or her office shall be in the blank. The electors shall be permitted to vote se arately "Yes" or "No" upon this -3- question. If a majority of those voting on the question of . recall vote in favor of recall, the official shall be thereby removed from office. "Sec. 5.20. Procedure to fill Vacancy. In the event that a council member is recalled by the electors or resi ns after a petition has been filed for his or her recall, the vacancy shall be filled in the following manner: If less than six months remain in the council member's term of office at the time of the recall election or at the time of resignation in response to a recall petition, as the case may be, the vacancy shall be filled by the remainin members of the city council for the unexpired term ursuant to Sec. 2.05. If six months or more remain in the council member's term at the time of such recall or resignation, the council shall call a special election to fill the vacancy for the balance of the council member's term. Such election shall be called within-ten days after such recall or resignation, and the s ecial election shall be held not less than 30 nor more than 45 days after the meeting at which the election is called. Candidates to fill the unexpired term shall be nominated in the usual way and the elec- tion shall be conducted as far as ossible in accordance with procedures in municipal elections except that there shall be no primary election and the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the office shall be elected to fill the unex fired term." (6) Effective Date. This ordinance is effective ninety (90) days after its publication, subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 410.12, Subdivision 7. Passed by the. City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1982. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • -4-