04-25-83 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~~
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 143
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
~tilembers of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolution Authorizing the Sale and Issuance
of $3,700,000 of Commercial Development
Revenue Bonds, Richfield State Agency Project
Cn July 20, 1981, the city council adopted a resolution
giving preliminary approval to Richfield State Agency for the
issuance of Com~-nercial Development Revenue Bonds for their pro-
ject located at the northeast corner of 66th Street and Lyndale
Avenue. As of this time all of the bonds have been sold (that
is, the underwriter has orders for all the bonds) at a net
effective interest rate of 8.25%. These bonds are dated May 1,
1983, and they mature on May 1 through the year 1993 in serial
maturity, with a single maturity of $1,180,000 in the year 1998.
These bonds are secured b_y an irrevocable Letter of Credit
issued by F & M Marquette National Bank and by a mortgage of the
project to the same bank. These bonds will be paid off in their
entirety by the Richfield State Agency and they in no way con-
stitute a legal debt of the City of Richfield.
It is requested that the city council adopt the attached
resolution which officially authorizes the issuance of these
bonds.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
•
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RICHFIELD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Gity
Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, was duly held in the
City Hall in said City on Monday, April 25, 1983~at T:00 o'clock p.m., C.T.
The following members of the Council were present:
and the following were absent:
• Councilmember introduced the following resolu-
tionand moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF
$3,700,000 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS
(RICHFIELD"STATE AGENCY, INC. PROJECT)
UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT TO
FINANCE A PROJECT THEREUNDER SECURED BY PAYMENTS UNDER
A LOAN AGREEMENT AND AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
FROM F & M MARQUETTE NATIONAL BANK, IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA, AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
(thee City), as follows:
Section 1. Authorization and Recitals.
1.01. General Authority. The City is authorized by Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act), to-issue its revenue bonds .and
to make secured or unsecured loans to finance the acquisition of real
property and the acquisition or construction of buildings and improvements
r~
u
on such real property and the installation of machinery and equipment of
any and all kinds and any other personal properties deemed necessary in
connection with a project, as defined in the Act.
1.02. Proposed Project and Bonds. Allison-Williams Company of
Minneapolis, Minnesota (the Underwriter) and representatives of Richfield
State Agency, Inc. (the Company) have proposed that the City, acting under
and pursuant to the Act, issue and sell to the Underwriter its $3,700,000
Commercial Development Revenue Bonds (Richfield State Agency, Inc. Project)
(the Bonds), the proceeds of which are to be used for the purpose of paying
costs incurred by the Company in the acquisition and construction of a
project. consisting of the acquisition of land, related .site improvements.
and the remodelling and addition to an existing building for retail office.
space (the Project). Pursuant to the proposal the proceeds of the Bonds
will be loaned by the City to the Company and the Company agrees to make
payments sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The
City will grant a security interest in certain revenues and payments to be
received by the City under the Loan Agreement (as hereinafter defined) to a
Trustee (as hereinafter defined). To further secure the Bonds, F & M
Marquette National Bank, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, a national banking
association (the Bank), will issue its Irrevocable Letter of Credit (as
hereinafter defined) to the Trustee (as hereinafter defined), under which
the Bank will agree to pay the principal of, premium if any, upon mandatory
redemption, and up to nine months' interest on the Bonds upon the terms
therein provided.
1.03. Preliminary City Ap roval. The Council gave preliminary appro- •
val of the sale of its revenue bonds pursuant to the Act and the loan of
,the proceeds to the Company for the acquisition and construction of the
Project and authorized the preparation of .such documents as may be appro-
priate to the Project by the following actions:
(a) June 22, 1981, adoption of Resolution No. 6453, calling
for a public hearing on .the Project;
(b) July 1, 1981,' publication in the Richfield Sun, the
official newspaper of the City, of the notice of public hearing.
(c) July 1, 1981, publication in The Minneapolis Star and
Minneapolis Tribune, newspapers of general circulation throughout
the City,. of the notice of public hearing;
(d) July 20, 1981, adoption of Resolution No. 6469 giving.
preliminary approval to the Project.
1.04. Documentation. Forms- of the following documents relating to
the Project and the Bonds have been prepared and submitted to this Council
and are hereby directed to be filed in the office of the City Clerk:
(a) a Loan Agreement .(the Loan Agreement), to be dated as
of May 1, 1983, proposed to be made and entered into between the
City and the Company;
(b) an Indenture of Trust (the Indenture), to be dated as
of May 1, 1983, proposed to be made and entered into between the
City and F & M Marquette National Bank, a national banking asso-
ciation, as trustee (the Trustee);
(c) an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (the Letter of Credit),
dated as of May 1, 1983, proposed to be given by the Bank in
favor of the Trustee for the account of the Company .(not executed
by City);
(d) a Mortgage and Security Agreement and Fixture Financing
Statement (the Mortgage), dated as of May 1, 1983, proposed to be
made and entered into between the Company and the Trustee (not
executed by City);
(e) a Letter of Credit and 1eimbursement Agreement (the
Reimbursement Agreement), dated as of May 1, 1983, proposed to be
made and entered into between the Company. and the Bank (not
executed by City);
(f) a Mortgage and Security Agreement and Fixture Financing
Statement (the Bank Mortgage), dated as of May 1, 1983, proposed
to be made and. entered into between the Company and the Bank (not
executed by the City);
(g) an Assignment of Rents .and Leases, .dated as of May 1,
1983, given by Company to Trustee (the Trustee Assignment);
..{h) an Assignment of Rents and Leases, dated as of May 1,
1983, given by Company to Bank ($ank Assignment);
O a Disbursing Agreement Among Trustee,- Bank and Title
.Insurance Company of Minnesota, dated as of May 1, 1983, (the
Disbursing Agreement);
(j) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the Bond Purchase Agree-
ment), proposed to be made and entered into by and between the
Underwriter, the City and the Company; and
(k) a Preliminary Official Statement, (the Preliminary
Official Statement), dated April 11, 1983.
(1) an Official Statement (the .Official Statement) dated
April 25, 1983.
Section 2. Findings.
It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
(a) the Project, as defined herein and in the Loan Agree-
ment, constitutes a project authorized by Section 474.02, Sub-
. division la of the Act;
(b) the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof
will be to promote the public welfare by encouraging and re- •
taining the location, retention and development of economically.
sound industry and commerce within the City so as to prevent, so
far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and
areas of chronic unemployment; by promoting the use of available
resources of the community thereby retaining the benefit of its
existing investment in educational and public service facilities;
by discouraging the movement of talented, educated personnel of
mature age to other areas, thus preserving the economic and human
resources needed as a base for providing governmental services
and facilities; and by encouraging more intensive development of
land in the City to provide an adequate and better balanced tax
base to finance the increase in the amount. and cost of govern-
mental services and by assisting the City in meeting its devel-
opment objectives for the LHN Redevelopment Project Area;
(c) the Project is located in the City, at a site which is
readily accessible to employees residing within the City and the
surrounding community;
(d) the Project adds to the tax base of the City and over-
lapping taxing jurisdictions;
(e) the Project has been approved by the Commissioner of
Securities and Real Estate of the State of rlinnesota, as tending
to further the purposes and policies of the Act;
,.(f) the financing of the Project, the authorization of the
Bonds in the principal amount of $3,700,000, the execution and
delivery of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture and the Bond Pur-
chase Agreement and the performance of all covenants and agree-
ments of the City contained in the .Loan Agreement, the Indenture
and the Bond Purchase Agreement and of a1I other acts and. things
required under the Charter of the City and the Constitution and
laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement, the
Indenture. and the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds valid and
binding special limited obligations in accordance with their
terms, are authorized by the Act;
(g) it is desirable that a series of Commercial Development
Revenue Bonds in the amount of $3,700,000 be issued by the City
upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, under the provisions
of which the City grants to the Trustee a security interest in
certain revenues and payments to be received by the City under
the, Loan Agreement as security for the payment of the principal,
premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds;
(h) the loan payments contained in the Loan Agreement are
fixed, and are required to be revised from time to time as neces-
sary, so as to produce income and revenue sufficient to provide
for prompt payment of principal of and interest on all Bonds
issued under the Indenture when due; and the Loan Agreement also
provides that the Company is required to pay all expenses of the •
operation and maintenance of .the Project,. including, but without
• limitation, adequate insurance thereon and insurance aganst all
liability for injury to persons or property arising from the
operation thereof, and all taxes and special assessments levied
upon or with respect to the Project site and payable during the
term of the Loan Agreement; and
(i) under the provisions of Section 474.10 of the Act and
as provided in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are
not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds of the City
other than the revenues and payments pledged to the payment
thereof; .the City is not subject to any liability thereon and no
holders of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any
exercise of the taxing powers of the City to pay any of the Bonds
or the interest thereon nor to enforce payment thereof against
any property of the City, except the revenues and payments under
the Loan Agreement pledged to the payment thereof; the Bonds
shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or
equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues and
payments thereof; each Bond issued. under the Indenture shall
recite that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable
solely from the revenues and. payments. pledged to the payment
thereof; and no Bond shall constitute a debt of the City within
the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter limita-
tion; provided, however, that nothing contained in this paragraph
(i) shall impair the rights of the holders of the Bonds or the
Trustee to enforce covenants made for the security of the payment
• of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds.
Section 3. Approval of Documents.
The forms of the Loan .Agreement, the. Indenture and the Bond Purchase
Agreement referred to in Section 1.04 hereof are approved subject to such
modifications as are deemed;appropriate and approved by the City Attorney
and the City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by
execution of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreement
and the Bonds by the Mayor and City Manager. The forms of the other docu-
merits. listed in Section 1.04 are approved. The Mayor and City Manager are
directed to execute the Loan Agreement upon execution thereof by the Com-
pang, to execute the Indenture upon execution thereof by the Trustee and to
execute the Bond Purchase Agreement upon execution. thereof by the Under-
. writer and the Company. Copies of all of the documents-shall be delivered,
filed and recorded as provided therein. The Mayor and City Manager are'
also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be
required to give effect to the transactions herein contemplated.
Section 4. The Bonds; Terms, Sale and Execution.
4.01. Authorization. The City hereby authorizes the issuance of the
Bonds in the principal amount of $3,700,000 in the form and upon the terms
• set forth in the Indenture and this resolution. The Bonds are hereby sold
to the Underwriter at the price and upon the terms contained in the Bond •
Purchase Agreement.
4.02. Execution. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Indenture
and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this
resolution, the other documents required in the Indenture, and such other
certificates, documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect the
transaction herein contemplated. The Trustee is hereby appointed authenti-
cating agent pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1.
4.03. Modifications, Absence of Officers. The approval hereby given
to the various documents referred to above includes an approval of such
modifications thereto, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be
necessary and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the City
Manager prior to the execution of the documents. The execution of any
instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein
authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents
in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence or disability of the
Mayor, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed,
may be executed by the acting Mayor and in the absence or disability of the
City Manager by such officer of the City who, in the. opinion of the City
Attorney, may execute such documents.
Section 5. Authentication of Proceedings.
The Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk and other officers of the City •
are authorized and directed to furnish to the Underwriter, the Bank and
bond counsel certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City
relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be
required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of
the Bonds as such facts appear-from the books and records in the officer's
custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified
copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished,
shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all state-
ments contained therein.
Section 6. Official Statement.
The City hereby consents. to the distribution of the Preliminary Offi-
cial Statement and the Official Statement in substantially the form of the
Preliminary Official Statement. by the Underwriter to potential purchasers
of the Bonds... The City has not participated in .the preparation of the.
Preliminary Official Statement or the Official Statement and has made no
independent investigation with respect to the information contained therein
or in the appendix thereto, and the City assumes no responsibility for. the
sufficiency, accuracy or completeness of such information.
Section 7. Statement of Election.
The principal amount of the Bonds being. in excess of $1,000,000; the
City rlanager is. hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City to
execute and file with the Internal Revenue Service a statement of election
to issue its obligations in excess of $1,000,000 as provided by Section
103(b)(6)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, and Section
1.103(b)(2)(vi) of the Regulations promulgated.thereunder.
Passed and Adopted this 25th day of Aprii, 1983.
Mayor
John Hamilton
Attest:
City Clerk
Sylvia K. Bergh
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly
seconded by and upon vote being taken thereon
the following voted in favor thereof:
and' the following voted against or: abstained:
whereupon said. resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS.
CITY OF RICHFIELD )
I, the. undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully
compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting
of the City Council held on Monday, April 25, 1983, with the original
thereof on file in my office and I further certify that the same is a full,
true:. and. complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the
issuance and sale of the City's $3,700,000 Commerical Development Revenue
Bonds (Richfield State Agency, Inc. Project).
WITNESS My hand as Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this
day of 1983.
Sylvia K. Bergh
' City Clerk
City of Richfield, Minnesota
(SEAL)
•
CITY Or RICH I~LD, ?~II`d:v~SOTA
Office of City i`~!anager
~`~
Counci 1 Letter PTO. 1 42
Agenda Apr i1 25, 1983
The Honorable .~1a~,~or
and
_`~?embers of the City Council
City of Richf ie 1d
Council ~?embers:
Subject: Request for Council to Initiate Rezoning,
910 6Jest 66th Street
•
•
~Ir. David Elasky would like to rezone the property at 910
West 66th Street from R-Residential to C-1-Limited Business to
allow him to convert the existing residence into a dental office.
City ordinance indicates that a rezoning may be initiated in
either of two ways. The rezoning may be initiated by petition
of the owners of not less than SO% or" the land proposed to be
rezoned, and by the owners of at least Sa~~of the land within
300 feet of the land proposed to be rezoned. The other ~~~ay a
rezoning could be initiated is by action of the city council.
~~ir. Dlasky has attempted to gain the required number of signa-
tures on a petition, but has been una'~le to do so. The petition
and letters of support which he has filed with city staff on1_y
have signatures of Owners of 45% of the land within 300 feet
instead of the required SOS. ~?r. Dlascy is "requesting that
the city council initiate the requested rezoning of the parcel
from R-Single Family Residence :o C-1-L_mi~ed Busi;-:ess.
Review of past practices indicated that the city council
has not initiated rezonincs unless there was a definite public
purpose Served ~y the rezoning such as a nlanced unit develop-
ment rezoning in the Lyndale/Hub/~icollet Redevelcp~.ent Area.
There does not appear to be any public purpose served to rezone
this property as requested. The Site is not caithin the Lyndale/
Hub/Nicollet Redevelopment Area. In oast rezoning actions, the
council has placed significant emphasis upon the comments and
concerns of persons owning oroDerty in close proximity to prop-
osed rezonings.
It 11ght Of that LaCt 1t 1S the stafL~s OOinlOP. that the
C1ty COl"inCll ShOllld P.Ot lnltlate tI71S reZGning~ and should re-
quire that the acpl_icant obtain the required number o= siana-
tUreS On a petition i~ he w1SheS t0 prOCeed wlti~ the reZOT`il':g.
If the C0~.2nC11 `,JISheS t0 lnltlate tt?1S reZOnlnq, it iS reCC~."~'Ti_e.^.d-
ed that the COUnC' 1 rear ~'r~e -T~a`_=e'~ ~G ~^.° D1_ar?rl'''.7 CCi~=';l S10P
~Or ~hel_ COnSlder3~lGn _.. aCCOr:.a:"'.Ce ".iit',.`the ^Cri~.ai _~~.'.^_::iig
reV1e:~1 process.
ReSOectfuily submitted,
I , ~ ,.- -
~drl ~i0 i lenber:er
City ~~Ianager
PST ITl O ~1 M,qp
~.,
~~ ~
.,
. ~ •.,
• ••.
t::::::.:::
. R .; ,:.. ~,:.
•- .~.•
~ Y•,J::~, •~ ' ~~
• ~~ ~ • , ~.
•
y-~:
. •
i!
s
~ i
x
St~o-Jl>"Tt.~R.6S ~BTAJNE~
• -'Soo waT RAC + u S
REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM ' ~ ~ TO ____ \,
FOR THE FOLLOWING PURPOSE '~ i= ti "i r~ ~. ~ - ~ ~ ;. ~_
STREET ADDRESS : mil' i~ t_L- ~-' ~ ~ { ~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
bde, the undersigned, being owners of land within 300 feet of the land
described above, do hereby concur in this Rezoning request.
Signature of Owners* Address Legal Description
-`
ice- f ~l - ~ ~' it 1\
n /
~%C'~^~c.. ~~ 'cam
~~%,~.3 ~v. ~~~~tzt, .~~.
~--
_~;
.-
~ , , , .
,~---
i
* For purposes of dete reining if petition contains the proper number
of signatures to initiate the rezoning process signatures may not
be removed once a petition is signed and returned to the Planning
Division.
~\ `\
_y
~ ~`
^\
~ ~
~ !~ ~
~ ~c= ~ ~
i
_
"~
~~ r~ ~~
~• ~~ __ . ~
, ~
~^. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
`
~;
~. ~--~
• ~}
~\ ,\ -~
, r.~
y
~ \ ~
., ~ r,
>•
r
CT ct f-' ti o c ~ ~ ~ ~
d 7
~
O 6 ~ N• O O O ~..
~
• ~/,
"
'
{"" CD ~
1J ~
~
-~ ~-~' ~
C
}
Ct lr --~
~~ ~ N N
~
O C ./~
<~
~ ~D ~
V
~ S "~ ~
O ~' ~ c-* ~ ~
~ '~ ~ rp
Y ~ CJ !~ •• . C r
ca ~ O fi ~ -n . d
~~ ~ ~ ~ 'n
~ '= O O 1-~ ~
~
- UI L .. ,J
• ~ ~ ~
~ ~ Ja :~
• rt
~' '7
L ~ 'n ~-^
;a O O ~ ~D
`''
~
~ ~S ;~ ~
D ~-'-
V v ~ i
~~ O - • J
:-t ~ ~ -.
V ~--• ~ t ~
~' J ^i
;D
O.
~~
~ ~ .
~.~ ~\
\~~~
~\
.~ r~
v ~.
~; ~\
,.~ ~,
Y
,y
rJ
.~
u
.~
'a
J.
~.
~..!
•
David J.Elasky, D.D.S.
7001 Nicollet Avenue South
Richfield, Mn. 55423
Dear Mr.Elasky,
921 Rae Drive
Richfield,Minnesota 55423
March 8,1983
We received your letter of inquiry on March 2 regarding 910 West 66th Street.
We are not in favor of your proposed building on this residential block.
We like the Parkins family and want them to be successful in selling their
property, but we do not feel that your proposed development would be in our
best interest here on a residential block.
We are not in favor of a variance or re-zoning for your project and request
the Planning Commission and the City Council to honor our decision in this
matter.
Yours very truly,
~~~~ ~ 1
Edwin H.Burkhardt
~I~t~rt-E. C
Anne C.Burkhardt
copy: City of Richfield, R.Joepke
Planning Commission
John Hamilton, Mayor
Council Members
•
~\ `a __
~ ;,,~ ., ;
_ `•_ • ~"}
~ ~ ~ ~} o , .
• ~ ~~• ~~ . j ~~~~~ .
~;: '"
t ~, ~ j ~ ~
r-. , i
~Jf} {
~ ~ \77 ` ` ) ,.. i - it
/ r f i .
~^ 1 ~'-~ .C ~~ •f ~• ii %~ ,. ~ I
J / .
i
''~ °°° ..
F
(r f
y ~ /
,I~~' _ ~ ~ '• ~. ~
? j ~ ~ _ ~ '
~ n,/: ~ .
- ,`,: r
i' * i F
`~ ~ ~ ~• . t
at, _.
y
1 ~w ,.
.. .
w ~<,
~ _
1 ~ ~:
.l • ~ 4
l~. ~ ~
~,~1~•
~~
~j ~ ~//
1
J
~.
AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 1980-33 OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Ordinance 1980-33 of the City of Richfield granting a
franchise to operate and maintain a cable communication system is
hereby amended in the following respects:
A. By amending Article III, Section 4 thereof to read as
follows:
"SECTION 4. FACILITIES.
The Grantee shall construct, maintain and
continue to provide all facilities and equipment
set forth in the-Offering or as otherwise provided
in Article V, Section 2 and Amended Exhibits A
and B hereto, including, but not limited, to, the
headend, hubs, distribution system, studios,
equipment and other facilities. Grantee's plan,
as set forth in the Offering, for implementing the
construction, utilization and maintenance of these
facilities, including its plans for accommodating.
future growth and changing needs and desires,
shall be fully and timely performed."
B. By amending Article V, Section 2 thereof to read as
follows:
- "SECTION 2. LINE EXTENSION POLICY.
Fcaetee1s-e~tes.s~ee-e~-sec~~ee-te-these
areas-eat-i~e~eded-}~-the-~a~t~a~-sec~~ee-aces
sha~~-He-deee-p~tcsnant-te-the-fe~~ew~~e}-cee~t~}cements-
P:----~tes~der~ees-~aeatee~-eatslde-tie-}~~t~a~
sec~~ee-aces-~~~~-be-gce~~elee~-sec~~ee-~tge~-aeee~tar~ee
e~-a-~~ete-~cem-Scar~tee---~~ie-~t~ete-s~ia~~-s.et
e~eeeel-the-east-te-6ca~tee;-ea~et~~ated-ems-a-time
aid-x~atec~a~-bass;-s~-e~tes.d~ng-tie-eable-aed
r~eeessac~*-eab~e-e~a~gme~t-te-sec~~ee-sa}d-esec-
B:---A~~-~e~ces~de~t~a~-esec-ce~eest}~~
sec~~ee-~}~~-be-gca~~ded-sec~r~ee-ttgerc-aeeegtar~ee
e~-a-geete-~cem-6cantee---~'~ie-e~t~ete-s~a~~-eat
e~eeed-t~ie-east-to-6car~tee; -ealett~ated-e~-a-t~cte
aed-matec~a~-bass;-e~-e~te~d}ag-tie-eab~e-a~e~
aeeessacy-eab~e-ee~a~~me~t-te-sec~~ee-sa~e~-esec-
A. Service will be provided to residents of
the City in areas with an average density less
• than forty (40) dwelling units per street mile or
cable mile, whichever provides the greater benefit
to the subscribers, as determined by the City,
based upon the cost contribution formula defined
below.
Residents of the City in areas with an average
density of at least forty (40) dwellin units per
street mile or cable mile,. whichever provides the
greater benefit to the subscribers, as determined
by City, will not be required to make a cost
contribution formula below in order to receive
service. The monthly charge for cable service in
the extended area shall be the same as elsewhere
in the system.
each
B. The cost contrib
interested subscriber
be determined as foll
tion to be allocated to
in the extended area
s:
1. Grantee shall estimate the total
cost of constructing and maintaining for
three (3) years from the date service is
available,- the line extension to be constructed
in the extended areas. Total construction
cost is defined as including all labor and
material costs necessary to construct .and
activate that part of the system commencing
at the nearest point of existing plant and
running to and within the extended area.
2. The standard cost er dwelling unit
in the extended area shall be determined by
dividing. the total from (1) above by 40.
s
ensity.
3. Grantee's contribution to the cos
of the line extension shall be determined b
dividing the total number of dwellin units
in the extended area by the number of miles
in the extended area., and multiplying the
resulting number by the standard cost per
dwelling unit.
4. The difference between the total
costs (1) and the Grantee's contribution (3)
is the total contribution of the subscribers
in the extended area:
-- - - _ '-t Vl ~V31a7
subscribing to the service in the extended
area. '
C. Service under the line extension policy
shall be provided in accordance with the following
procedure.
• ..
•
5. The amount to be paid by each-
subscribing resident shall be determ;nar'
1. Residents in an area with an average
density of less than forty (40) dwelling
• units per street mile or cable mile as
determined above, who desire cable service
shall petition the Council for designation as
an extended area. The petition shall
include a map showing the dwelling ..units..
proposed to be included in the designated
extended area.
2. - The Council shall by resolution
designate the dwelling units to be included
in the extended area.
3. Upon designation of an extended
area, Grantee shall prepare a map indicating
the trunk cable line that will be constructed
to serve the extended area and shall estimate
the combined total construction cost and
three (3) ear maintenance cost for service
to the 'extended area Section 2.B.1', the
Grantee's contribution (Section 2.B.3), and
the total contribution of the subscribers
(Section 2.B. 4.) .
4. Residents within the extended area
who wish to become subscribers. will have
thirty {30) days to commit to service, by
executing and submitting a commitment form
to Grantee.
5. Grantee will estimate the cost to
each subscriber according to the formula in
Section 2.B.5, above. Grantee will notify
Council and subscribers of the subscriber
cost estimate by U.S. mail.
6. Subscribers will have thirty (30)
days from the date of mailing of the subscriber
cost estimate in which to deposit the amount
of the subscriber cost estimate into an
escrow account to be maintained by the City.
7. If the total contribution of the
subscribers is deposited within the time
period specified in B.6 above, Grantee shall
construct the line extension. Construction
shall be completed and service made available
to the extension area within twelve 12
months from the-end of the subscriber contribution
deposit period.
8. Upon completion of the line extension
construction, the City will pay to Grantee
all funds in .the escrow account
9. Any resident who did not participate
initial subscriber contribution and who
wishes to hook up to the .line extension
within the-first three (3} years after
service is commenced in the extended area
must deposit into an escrow account to be
maintained by the city clerk the amount of
the subscriber cost estimate deposited by
original subscribers under paragraph 6
above. All such new contributions shall be
held in escrow until the end of the third.
year after service is commenced in the
extended area, at which time all funds in
escrow shall be divided equally and returned
to the then; current subscribers.
At the end of the three (3) ears followir
the commencement of service to the extended
area, all new subscribers in the extended
area will be ..provided cable television service
under the same terms as all other residents
of the. City.
D. Grantee shall hold the City`-and their
respective officers, agents, em loyees and representatives
harmless and indemnified against anv and all loss,
costs., damage and expense, includinq, without
limitation, attorneys' fees, now or hereafter
incurred by zt, and arising out of or due to,
claimed to arise out of or be due to, this ors
or the process following by City in adopting..
ordinance.°
C. By amending Article VI, Section 4, paragraph C{1) thereof
to read as follows:
"(1) .Rates and charges charged by Grantee for
monthly service and }~9ta~~at~en-a~e~ other charges
hereunder shall be uniform, fair and reasonable
and designed to meet all necessary cows of service,
including a fair rate of return on the original
cost, less depreciation, of the properties devoted
to such service (without regard to any subsequent
sale or transfer price or cos of such properties).
Installation charges shall be made pursuant to
Article V, Section 2 and Amended Exhibits A and
B hereto."
•
~~l
IZS
.~--~
!`~
_,i--
~__
~-
i ~
-I
,,S
- - -~
.., ~~~ Cr ~ 'Viii I^... L', ~'_~`•~.`. i.SVTA
Office Of City `.tanaCeL
Council Letter ~:o . i ~? 1
T":e Honorable `navor
and
.~~embers of the City Council
City cf Richfield
Council `".embers
Agenda April 25, 1983
Subject: Ordinance Amendira the Line Extension
Policy of ?~innesota Cablesvstems-Southwest.
Secor_c' := ead i ng .
Late last fall, certain questions were raised regarding
rr~hat areas were designated as Initial Service Areas, and which
areas were to be considered Line Extensions in the City of Eden
Prairie. Tile section of the franchise document relatinc to
this item was unclear, and as a result a clearly articulated
Line Extension Policy amendment was proposed. This ordinance
amendment received first reading at `ile~~Iarch 14, 1983 city
council meeting and the public 'r:earing on ~?arch 28, 1983 was
continued to April 23, 1983.
The ordinance amendment
• 1. The 76 homes listed
162 homes '_isted as
Initial Se,-~°;ce Are,
with no s ion if icant
provides t::at:
as area 1 in exhibit ~ and the
Area 13 would be served under the
s Policy at a cc~t cf S1>j,000
1mpaCt O1^i rates ;
2. The remaining 372 homes in Areas 1-i2, and 1=?-20,
would be served under a Line Jxtensicn Policy bssed
on a cost sharing ~ormu].a.
Preliminary approval of t:^.is ordi::ar.ce has bee.^. given by all
f i Ve C 1.tieS , thereby C 9 ar i ; V_ ing .h e _ _ne eXter_S ion CO l icy vof C:.e
franchise. tiowever, eXCe~t 'n v?'_r:'?etOniCa, final apDrGVaI has
been withileid bV ti'le C i t1eS , nencinq Settlement Of certain COri-
cerns of Eden Pra1.l:1e. AlthOUgh t1eSe 1SSl:eS remain unS2ttled,
it iS nOt believed neCeSSdrV tO furt:-ler DCSt~Cne final approval
Of te"?iS OrdlnanCe amendment.
The Ord _ndnCe ame.^.d Tie.^, _ _._ 3ttaC:ed =C ~1i 3 COUnC i l
letter, ar:d It 1S reCOIi~IRended ~ilat .:le `,itV Coti:^.Cil QiVe
second readir:c, apprcva_ at the April 23, 1983 city council
;aeet i na .
Res, ectf•al1•~ submitted,
~;~
• earl Nolienberger
City ^'anaaer
C_~
D. By amending Article XIV, Section 2, paragraph H thereof
to read as follows:
"H. Each exhibit is a part of this Franchise
and each is specifically incorporated herein by
reference. The exhibits are as follows:
Amended Exhibit A - Pap of Construction by Area,
Including Time Schedule
Amended Exhibit B - Rate Schedule"
E. By amending Article 1, Section A of Exhibit B thereof
entitled 'Rate Schedule' by deleting paragraph 5 thereof in its
entirety; and by renumbering the remaining paragraphs thereof
accordingly.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this day of 1983.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~/~
Office of C ity D~anager
Council Letter No. 140
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honoranle Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Possession
of Beer in City Parks. First Reading.
As members of the council are aware, the public safety de-
partment has been working with both the community services de-
partment and the community services commission in an effort to
develop an aggressive enforcement program to prevent a reoccurrence
of the problems we experienced last year related to drinking at
Taft Park. Presently, Richfield ordinance code 4.17 prohibits
the sale or consumption of beverages containing not less than
one-half of one percent alcohol by volume in the public parks
of our city.
Our public safety department has experienced some difficulty
in enforcing the terms of the existing language of the present
ordinance for the following reasons:
1. Officers rarely see actual consumption. As a re-
sult, a formal complaint rather than a citation must
be used to initiate the charge. This is an expensive,
time consuming, and sometimes difficult procedural re-
quirement for effective enforcement activity.
2. Judges may be reluctant to find actual consumption
when the officer cannot testify he actually saw the
defendant drinking.
Because of these problems associated with the enforcement
of the present ordinance relating to the sale and consumption
of beer in the parks, the public safety department has requested
an amendment to the current ordinance which would also prohibit
the possession of beer in city parks. The advantage of this
change would be to introduce control over this problem at an
earlier stage than presently exists. The individual carrying a
case of beer into the park would be violating the law at that
moment rather than later when he/she may choose to consume the
• beer. The result of prohibiting the possession of beer in the
parks is that more people may simply elect not to bring beer
Council Letter No. 140 -2- April 25, 1983
KN/ej a
•
AR4ENDMENT TO CHAPTER IV,
SECTION 4.17 OF THE ORDINANCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter IV, Section 4.17 of the Ordinance Code of the
City of Richfield dealing with beer in city parks is amended
in the following respects:
A. By amending the title of Section 4.17 to read
as follows:
"4.17 SASE-APdD-E9PdSHA4P~~9A}-6F BEER IN PARKS"
B. By amending subdivision 2 thereof to read as
follows:
"Subd. 2. Sale, Possession and Consumption
Prohibited. The sale, possession with intent to
consume or consumption of beer ~e~e~ae~es-eee~a~~i~g
~e~-less-~i~an-ewe-halms-ef-eee-~e~ea~c~-aleei~e~
]~y-~e~t~e is prohibited in the public parks of
the city."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
• Minnesota this day of 19gS•
John Hamilton, ~2ayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
/~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 139
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Consideration of Target Issue Goals for 1983/84
The city council recently held a session for the purpose
of identifying "target issues" important to the city over the
next two-year period. After the issues were identified, a pri-
ority ranking was established. This process was facilitated with
the professional assistance of Mr. Lyle Sumek.
Attached is a listing of the target issues and priorities
as established by the council. Council members are reminded that
• the priorities are only relative to the issues listed. For ex-
ample, a "low priority" ranking does not mean the issue is unim-
portant, but it does mean that other issues were found to be of
greater importance to the council.
It is expected
as an important guide
staff for the purpose
next several months.
the target issues by
meeting.
that the target issues listing will serve
to both the city council and the city
of allocating time and resources over the
It is recommended that the council adopt
motion. at the April 25, 1983 city council
Resp`ctfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
•
Attachment E
TARGET ISSUES: 1984
~1AYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF RICHFIELD
MARCH 1983
` ~ Priority
No. Target Issues Top ~ nigh I Moderate I Low Lowest ~
I
TOP PRIORITIES f
1.
Godfat:ner Block Development
2
-
-
- i
- 4
Complete negotiations
Monitor HRA activities
Find developer
2. LHN Completion 3 - - - -
RS A
RFC
GAD j
Nicollet Center/Red Owl
Parking lots
Opdahl property ,"
3. Young Families Program - 3 - - - -
Overall
Integrated plan of
programs
Future direction
. .. family
housing
4. Low Cost Senior Citizen 3 - - - -
Housing
Rental ~
Ownership
Possible land sites
~ Program actions
I
i
,
I
(
i
i
i
C~
61
i Page 2
Mayor and City Council Perspective
Priority
No. Target Issues Top I High Moderate Low Lowest i
5. Storm Sewer and Flood 3 - - - -
Control
Implementation
Financing
o. Aircraft Noise 3 - - - -
Work with Airport
Commission
Work in State Legislature
Monitor Federal Legisla-
tion
Runway 4/22
7. Aging Infrastructure 3 - - - -
Identification of problem
areas and needs
Comprehensive elan
Long term
Financing
HIGH PRIORITIES
1. City Finances 2 3 - - -
Service level and
priorities
City revenues
Operations
State aid
Property tax level
Subsidization of programs
2. Lincoln Hill/Portland 2 3 - - -
Review staff work
Meeting with other groups
Refine goal
02
image 3
•
Mayor and City Council Perspective -
Priority
No. Target Issues Top High Moderate Low Lowest
Future direction
Decision
3. 76th and Lyndale: I-35 to 1 4 - - ~
Nicollet i
Development of master
plan
Review
4. Legion Lake Develoment - 3 _ _ _
Final planning
Financing
Implementation
Housing
5. b6th from Portland to Cedar - 4 - _ _
Study
Future direction
o'. Cedar Avenue Liquor Store - 3 - _ ~
Site
Future direction
. Completion of study
Decision
MODERATE PRIORITIES
1. Park System and Open Spacem - 2 - 2 2
Lincoln Hills
Recommitment to park
development program
2. Community Clean-Environment 1 2 - 2 2
Health
Spring clean up
Junk cars
I
•
63
Page 4
Mayor and City Council Perspective
Priority
No. Target Issues Top High I Moderate Low Lowest
Weeds ~
Unkept houses
3. 76th and Penn and I-494 - 2 - 2 -
Address traffic problem
Future direction
Action
4. Quality Restaurant with - 1 - 2 2
Meeting Room
City active role in
attracting
LOW PRIORITIES
1. Capital Improvement Program 1 1 - 3 2
Maintenance
Future programs
Possible expansion
2. Housing Quality Conservation 1 2 - 3 -
of dousing Stock
Assess need
Program development ~
3. Community Survey Input from 1 1 - 3 2
Citizens
Development of process
Implementation
4. Commercial Development 1 2 - 3 -
Attracting Program
Active city role
Seek oportunities
I Small business assistance.
•
64
Page 5
Mayor and City Council Perspective
Priority
No. Target Issues Top High Moderate Low Lowest
S. Infant Care - 1 - 3 2
Development by outside
agency
City stimulate action
6. Labor Relations. - 2 - 4 1
City's position
Policy determination
LOWEST PRIORITIES
1. Family Motel and Conference - _ - - 3
Center
Active city role
2. Community Education 1 - - - 3
Convey goals
Better understanding of
city
Communications with
citizens
3. Liquor Store Profits - - - 1 3
Maintain profits
Monitor performance
Possible expansion
4. Local Public Transportation - - - - 3
( East-~dest Intra City)
Work with i~ITC
Trial program
C:
s5
.Page 5
Mayor and City Council Perspective
' Priority
No. Target Issues Top High Moderate Low Lowest
5. Noise Ordinance f - - - - 3
Review current ordinance
Possible strengthening
ordinance
Funding
6. Social Services - - - 3
City role
Financing
Determination of priori-
ties
Process for determining
priorities
7. Energy Program - - - - 3
Commitment
Initiation of program
I
l
~- i 7 ~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 138
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Memberse
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Related to Adjust-
ment of the Certification Charge to
Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts
City ordinances presently provide for a certification
charge of $10.00 on delinquent water and sewer accounts at
the time they are certified for collection as a special prop-
erty assessment.
Attached is an ordinance amendment prepared by the city
• attorney's office which would allow the certification charge
to be set by council resolution. This provides an easier
procedure for adjusting the certification charge when such ad-
justment is warranted.
Since it is believed the present certification charge
may be low when compared to city costs for delinquent water
and sewer accounts, it is likely that a resolution adjusting
the charge will be presented for council consideration at the
time of the second reading.
It is recommended that the city council give first read-
ing to the attached ordinance amendment and schedule the
second reading and public hearing for the i'~ay 9, 1983 city
council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/ej a
•
i
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER VIII,
PART II, SECTION 8.12 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter VIII, Part II, Section 8.12 of the Ordinance
Code of the City of Richfield dealing with rates and charges
for sanitary sewer service is hereby amended by amending
subdivision 12 thereof to read as follows:
"Subd. 12. Collections. All charges of se~.aer service
are due on the quarterly due date specified by the
city for the respective account and shall be delinquent
15 days thereafter. It is the duty of the city to
endeavor to promptly collect delinquent accounts, and
in all cases where satisfactory arrangements for
payment have not been made, all such delinquent accounts
shall be certified to the city clerk who shall prepare
an assessment of the delinquent amounts against the
properties served. To each account there shall be
added a Certification Charge (Preparation For Certification
of Taxes of Delinquent Accounts) in the amount provided
for in Appendix D e=-X19-99• This assessment roll
shall be delivered to the council for adoption on or
before October 1st of each year. Such action may be
optional or subsequent to taking legal action to collect
delinquent accounts. If the certification includes a
certification of a delinquent water bill, the certification
charge, when collected, shall be allocated equally
between the city's water fund and its sewer fund.
Passed by the City Council of tre City of Richfield,
r'Iinnesota this day of 1983.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST : `~
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
•
.~
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 137
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor ,~` o ~'
and '~''~~ ~° ~
,~ .
Members of the City Council `` '~`~
City of Richfield ~~,~ ~
y J
~' -
Council Members: ~-,~,~ '
Subject: 1983 A11ey Maintenance Project Public
Hearing
In order to implement the alley maintenance policies
passed by the city council, it is necessary for the council to
initiate a specific alley maintenance project. The maintenance
functions to be financed by this special assessment include
such work as some rough grading, the cleaning and sweeping of
potholes, cold patching and snowplowing. A public hearing on
the alley maintenance project has been scheduled for April 25,
1983.
Community Services Department personnel estimate the
annual cost of this project for the period April 1, 1983 through
December 31, 1983, to be $30,000. Of this amount, an. estimated
$27,360 would be for alley patching-type work. Alleys which
were resurfaced in 1981, 1982 or which are scheduled to be re-
surfaced in 1983 would not be assessed for patching type main-
tenance. Assessments would vary according to the amount of work
necessary on each individual alley. The costs for the repair of
an alley will be charged to the property owners abutting the
alley. For patching-type maintenance, this would result in an
estimated average assessment of about S19 per lot, assuming a
50 foot lot. Of the total $30,000 amount, an estimated $2,640
would be for snowplowing of alleys, whether resurfaced or patched.
Weather conditions during the period of April 1, 1983 through
December 31, 1983 will 'nave a significant impact on the actual
amount assessed. For snowplowing maintenance, this ~~~ou1d result
in an estimated average assessment of about $1.10 per lot, again
assuming a 50 foot lot.
It is recommended that the city council conduct the public
hearing and then adopt the attached resolution, ordering this
alley maintenance project and special assessment of current
services.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl Nollenberger
City :Manager
• RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ORDERING ALLEY MAINTENANCE
PROJECT X10. 791
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th
day of April, 1983, fixed a date for a council hearing on the
proposed maintenance of all alleys, and
WHEREAS, the owner of each parcel within the area
proposed to be assessed for the improvement described in said
resolution was mailed a copy of the required notice, and
~,9HEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through
publication of the required notice was given and the hearing
was held thereon on this 25th day of April, 1983, at which all
persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be
heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. Such alley miantenance is hereby ordered as proposed
in Council Resolution No. 6749 adopted the 11 day of
April, 1983.
• 2. That the city maintenance division be designated to
perform these maintenance functions.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, this 25th day of April, 1983.
John Hamilton Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Cler'~c
•
~~7~'
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 136
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Purchase in L"xcess of $2,650
The city council, by resolution, has required council
approval of purchases of merchandise, materials, equipment
or construction when the amount exceeds $2,650. There is
one such item on the April 25, 1983 city council agenda.
('nlr7 Mix
Cold mix is the asphalt product used for patching of
alleys. It is estimated 200 tons of cold mix will be used for
the 1983 patching season. Staff contacts with vendors indicate
that Commercial Asphalt does not prepare or make available cold
m ix, while Bury and Carlson prepares cold mix once a year in
quantities and timing not sufficieet to meet the need in Rich-
field. McNamara-Vivant does have sufficient quantities avail-
able in a timely manner at a 1983 delivered cost of $27 per
ton, the same price as charged to the city in 1982.
It is recommended that the city council authorize a
master purchase order for an estimated 200 tons cold mix at a
unit price of $27 per ton delivered, for an estimated total
purchase price of $5,400 from McNamara-Vivant.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
~_~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eaj
LJ
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ / 7,~"/
Office of City Manager
Council Letter i~1o. 135
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City
City of Richf field
Council Members:
Council
Subject:
Renewal of Contract for Hotel/Motel
Inspections
As council members may recall, the city has for several
years contracted with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety
to conduct the required fire prevention inspections of hotel
or motel establishments located within our community. In ex-
change for our inspection activity in this matter, the Minnes-
ota Department of Public Safety has provided training funds to
enable members of the Fire Division to attend annual fire code
training seminars at various locations within the State of
Minnesota.
The program has worked well for several years. It has
provided for a timely and comprehensive fire inspection ser-
vice for our hotel/motel establishments, as well as providing
excellent training opportunities for members of our Fire Division.
The contract is currently up for renewal. It is the
recommendation of the Public Safety Director, in which I con-
cur, that the city council authorize the City Manager and the
Director of Public Safety to renew this contract with the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
Respectfully submitted,
:~- ~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
7~D
Council Letter No. 134
Agenda Arpil 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Related to Disposal
of Confiscated Firearms. First Reading.
Recently the state statutes regulating the disposal of
confiscated firearms by local units of government have been
amended. This statutory change requires an amendment to our
city ordinance provision dealing with the disposal of fire-
arms which have been confiscated by our Department of Public
Safety. The city attorney°s office has prepared the attached
amendment to bring our ordinance code regulation into con-
formance with the terms now set forth in the state statutes.
The proposed amendment requires destruction of confiscated
illegal firearms, and the sale of confiscated legal firearms
only to licensed dealers. This is basically a "housekeeping"
change to keep our ordinance code provisions consistent with
state statutes.
It is the recommendation of the Director of Public
Safety, in which I concur, that the city council give first
reading approval to the attached ordinance amendment and
schedule the public hearing and second reading consideration
for May 9, 1983.
Respectfully submitted,
i
,~.
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
•
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION DECLARING .COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
CITY PROJECT 757 - RECONSTRUCTION OF
LYNDALE AVENUE, LAKE SHORE DRIVE TO 74TH STREET
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of
Lyndale Avenue between the center line of Lake Shore Drive and the
center line of 74th Street by widening, reconstruction of pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive aprons, street lights, and traffic
signals and the contract price for such improvement is $646,571.80,
and the expenses incurred or to be incurred. in the making. of such
improvement amount to $10.1,476.15 so that the .total cost of the
improvement will be $748,047.95
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Richfield,
Minnesota:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid
by the city is hereby declared to be $683,613_44, and
the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited
property owners is declared to be $64,613.44.
2. That said assessment shall run for a period of 20 years
and. include interest at a rate to be determined.
3. The city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel
of land within the district affected, without regard to
.cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a
copy of such- proposed assessment in his office for
public inspection.
4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the council thereof.
Adopted by the council this 25th day of April, 1983.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. .Bergh, City Clerk
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
CITY PROJECT 772 - SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of the
following streets by construction of concrete sidewalk:
On Side From To
75th Street North Penn Avenue Logan Avenue
76th Street South Lyndale Avenue James Avenue
Lyndale Avenue Both 62nd Street 64th Street
Lake Shore Drive ~ Both Lyndale Avenue 66th .Street
65th Street South Lyndale Avenue Pleasant Avenue
Nicollet Avenue Both 77th Street I-494
Portland Avenue West 77th Street I-494
77th Street South Elliot Avenue Chicago Avenue
12th Avenue West 76th Street I-494
77th Street South 12th Avenue 13th Avenue
And the contract price for such improvement is $105:,986.11, and
the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvement amount to $25,436.67 so that the total cost of the
improvement will be $131,422.78.-
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Richfield,
Minnesota:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by
the city is hereby declared to be $88,354.48 and the portion of
the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is at
least 20 percent of the total cost and is declared to be $43,068.30.
2. That said assessment shall run for a period of 5 years and
include interest at the rate determined at bond sale.
3. The city clerk and city .engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement
against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the
district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided
by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in
his office for public inspection.
4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the council thereof.
Adopted by the council this 25th day of April, 1983.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
FOR C.P. 775 ALLEY PAVING
WHEREAS costs have been determined for the improvement of the
following alleys by reconstruction and concrete paving:
Alley Between
From
To
62nd Street and 63rd Street
4th Avenue and 5th Avenue
4th Avenue and 5th Avenue
Clinton Avenue and 4th Avenue
Blaisdell Ave. and Nicollet Ave.
Grand Avenue and Pleasant .Ave.
Harriet Avenue and Grand Ave.
Garfield Ave. and Harriet Ave.
Queen Avenue and Penn Avenue
Russell Avenue and Queen Avenue
Thomas Avenue and Sheridan Avenue
Vincent Avenue and Upton Avenue
Washburn Avenue. and Vincent Avenue
Washburn Ave. and Vincent Ave.
Upton Ave. and Vincent Ave.
Aldrich Avenue and Lyndale Ave.
Queen Avenue and Russell Avenue
Queen Avenue and Penn Avenue.
14th Avenue
66th Street
73rd Street
73rd Street
73rd Street
72nd Street
72nd Street
72nd Street
67th Street
69th Street
66th Street
68th Street
68th Street
69th Street
67th Street
76th Street
67th Street
69th Street
15th Avenue
67th Street
74th Street
74th Street
74th Street.
73rd Street
73rd Street
73rd Street
68th Street
70th Street
67th Street
69th Street
69th Street
70th Street
68th Street
77th Street
68th Street
70th Street
And the contract price for such improvement is $2.95,085.35, and
the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making. of such
improvement .amount to $5.5.,141.15 so that the total cost of the
improvement will be $350,226.50.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the-City Council of Richfield,
Minnesota:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by
the city is hereby declared to be $16,023.92, and the
portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is at least: 20 percent of the total cost and is
declared to be $334,202.58.
2. That said assessment shall run for a period of 20 years and
include interest at the rate determined at bond sale.
3. The city clerk and the city engineer shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
.parcel. of land within the district affected, without
regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall
file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for
public inspection.
-2 -
4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed •
assessment, notify the council thereof.
Adopted by the council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this
25th day of April, 1983.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
i
•
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XII,
PART I, SECTION 12.01 OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY
• OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter XII, Part I, Section 12.01 of the Ordinance
Code of the City of Richfield dealing with the disposition
of unclaimed property is hereby amended in the following
respects:
A. By amending subdivision 2 thereof to read as
follows:
"Subd. 2. P4ethod of Disr~osition. Whenever any
property has come into the possession of the city
and has remained unclaimed by the owner thereof
for a period of six months or more, the city may
dispose of such property by sale at p~b~i-e
auction or other sale. If such property is a
legal firearm, sale may only be to a licensed
firearms dealer. In all other cases the sale
may be to the public. Such pt~bl~e auction or sale
shall be conducted under the direction of the city
manager, following published notice in the official
newspaper at least 10 days in advance of such
sale. All unclaimed properties sold at such
public auction cr sale shall be sold to the
highest crualified bidder."
B. By amending subdivision five thereof to read as
follows:
"Subd. 5. Items Which MaV be Destrcved. Items of
personal property having nuisance potential, such
as illecral firearms, dangerous weapons, 11GllOr and
narcotics may be destroyed upon order of the city
manager. A list of items so destroyed shall be
maintained for a period of at least six years
following such destruction.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this day cf 1983.
John Hamilton , D~ayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
~ %~
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 133
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Appointments to Advisory Board of Health
There are thre vacanties on the Advisory Board of Health
for terms which will expire on January 31, 1985. According to
state guidelines for advisory boards of health, one-third of
the membership should be persons who are health care providers.
In order to meet this qualification, the remaining three vacan-
cies should be filled by persons who are health care providers.
Ms. Rose Jost, Dr. Steven Nelson and Ms. Mary Brekke, all of
• whom are health care providers, have made application for
appointment to the Advisory Board of Health.
Copies of their applications are attached to this council
letter. These appointments have been scheduled for the April
25, 1983 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl `~ollenberger
City ~?anager
KN/eja
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, P7INNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 132
Agenda April 20, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Bids for the Purchase of $4,950,000 General
Obligation Refunding Bonds
Pursuant to the resolution adopted by the city council at
its meeting of March 28, 1983, bids were solicited for the
purchase of the bonds, and bids were opened at 11:00 a.m. this
morning.
Four bids were received, and all were very competitive
(please see the enclosed bid tabulation). The low bid was sub-
• mitted by Merrill, Lynch, White-Weld of Minneapolis for the
price after discount, of $4,873,600.00. The net interest rate
is $8.19%, slightly more favorable than the earlier estimate
of the city's financial consultant.
Based on this bid, the present value of savings to the
city from the refunding is $148,567, compared with the earlier
estimated savings of $135,169. It should also be noted that,
as expected, the City's AA bond rating remained in effect for
this bond issue.
Representatives of Evensen-Dodge will be present at the
council meeting to review the bids with the council and to
respond to any questions.
It is recommended that the city council adopt the resol-
ution awarding the sale of $4,950,000 General Obligation Re-
funding Bonds of 1983 to Merrill, Lynch, White-Weld.
ubmitted,
s
Res ectfully
gt
,~
9 ~ ,C; P 7
~.~ ~
•` ..~
.
_ ~ ~s;
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
/~~
CITY OF RICHFIr'~D, MII~~i1ESC7I'A
Office of City Manager
Council Letter Nc. 131
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Resolutions Authorizing Preparation of
Assessment Rolls for C.P. 757, 772 and
775
Attached are resolutions declaring the costs to be assessed
and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment rolls
for the following city projects:
C.P. 757-Reconstruction of Lyndale Avenue, Lake Shore
Drive to 74th Street. Total Cost - $748,047.95, assessed
portion - $64,613.44
C.P. 772 - 1982 Sidewalk Construction. Total cost -
$131,422.78, assessed portion - $43,068.30.
~'-p. 775 - 1982 Alley Paving Project. Total cost -
$350,216.5U, assessed portion - 5334,202.58.
The following is a comparison of the estimated and actual
per abutting foot costs:
C.P. 757 - Lyndale Avenue, Lake Shore Drive to 74th Street
East Side T,Vest Side
Estimate $10.00+ Drive Apron $13.00 + Drive Apron
(Variable) (Variable)
Actual $9.71+ Drive Apron $11.48 + Drive Apron
(Variable) (Variable)
C.P. 772 - Sidewalk Construction
Residential Commercial
Estimate 52.30 $5.76
Actual 2.35 5.87
•
Council Letter No. 131 -2- April 25, 1983
C.P. 775 - Alley Paving --
Res ident ia1 Commerical
Estimate $18.50 $27.75
Actual $16.25 $24.38
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached
resolutions ordering the assessment rolls for these projects.
At the May 9, 1983 council meeting, the assessment rolls will
be presented to the city council to receive the assessment rolls
and set the date for public hearings on these projects.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Karl Nollenberger
City Manager
KN/eja
•
•
RESOLUTION
• RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
CITY PROJECT 757 - RECONSTRUCTION OF
LYNDALE AVENUE, LAKE SHORE DRIVE TO 74TH STREET
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the improvement of
Lyndale Avenue between the center line of Lake Shore Drive and the
center line of 74th Street by widening, reconstruction of pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive aprons, street lights, and traffic
signals and the contract price for such improvement is $646,571.80,
and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvement amount to $101,476.15 so that the total cost of the
improvement will be $748,047.95
NOw THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Richfield,
Minnesota:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid
by the city is hereby declared to be $683,613.44, and
the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited
property owners is declared to be $64,613.44.
2. That said assessment shall run for a period of 20 years
and include interest at a rate to be determined.
3. The city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel
of land within the district affected, without regard to
cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a
copy of such proposed assessment in his office for
public inspection.
4. The clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the council thereof.
Adopted by the council this 25th day of April, 1983.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
FOR C.P. 775 ALLEY PAVING
WHEREAS costs have been determined for the improvement of the
following alleys by reconstruction and concrete paving:
Alley Between From To
62nd Street and 63rd Street 14th Avenue 15th Avenue
4th Avenue and 5th Avenue 66th Street 67th Street
4th Avenue and 5th Avenue 73rd Street 74th Street
Clinton Avenue and 4th Avenue 73rd Street 74th Street
Blaisdell Ave. and Nicollet Ave. 73rd Street 74th Street
Grand Avenue and Pleasant Ave. 72nd Street 73rd Street
Harriet Avenue and Grand Ave. 72nd Street 73rd Street
Garfield Ave. and Harriet Ave. 72nd Street 73rd Street
Queen Avenue and Penn Avenue 67th Street 68th Street
Russell Avenue and Queen Avenue 69th Street 70th Street
Thomas Avenue and Sheridan Avenue 66th Street 67th Street
Vincent Avenue and Upton Avenue 68th Street 69th Street
Washburn Avenue and Vincent Avenue 68th Street 69th Street
Washburn Ave. and Vincent Ave. 69th Street 70th Street
Upton Ave. and Vincent Ave. 67th Street 68th Street
Aldrich Avenue and Lyndale Ave. 76th Street 77th Street
Queen Avenue and Russell Avenue 67th Street 68th Street
Queen Avenue and Penn Avenue 69th Street 70th Street
And the contract price for such improvement is $295,085.35, and
the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvement amount to $55,141.15 so that the total cost of the
improvement will be $350,226.50.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Richfield,
Minnesota:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by
the city is hereby declared to be $16,023.92, and the
portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is at least 20 percent of the total cost and is
declared to be $334,202.58.
2. That said assessment shall run for a period of 20 years and
include interest at the rate determined at bond sale.
•
3. The city clerk and the city engineer shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or
parcel of land within the district affected, without
regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall
file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for
public inspection.
-~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 130
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Personal
Leave. Second Reading.
At the April 11, 1983 city council meeting, the city
council gave first reading approval to an ordinance amendment
relating to conversion of personal leave benefits to sick
leave benefits in certain situations, and scheduled second
reading and the public hearing for the April 25, 1983 city
• council meeting. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment
is attached to this council letter.
The ordinance amendment is a "Housekeeping" amendment
which brings the language in the conversion provision up to
date with the remainder of the Personal Leave ordinance section.
As council members may recall, personal leave was modified in
February, 1983, to include General Services employees. The
conversion section of the ordinance provides for employees
who may be reclassified from an employee group accruing per-
sonal leave to an employee group accruing sick leave. The
change proposed in the attached ordinance amendment merely
recognizes the General Services employees as a group receiving
the personal leave benefit.
It is recommended that the city council hold the public
hearing and give second reading approval to this ordinance
amendment at the April 25, 1983 city council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Rarl Nollenberger
City ~Ianaaer
• Ki~I/ej a
• ~u~L:~IDMEN~ TO CF~_ J^L'R II,
SECTION 2 33 CF T1 ORDI~i~NCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter II, Section 2.33 of the Ordinance Code of the City
c` Richfield relating to city employee at~endance and
leaves is hereby amended in the following resoects:
I. 3y amending Section 2.33, Subdivision 3(')(b) thereof,
to read as follows:
"(b) Conversion of Sick Deave Benefit. Each
employee who becomes eligible fcr oersonal leave and
who has accrued sick leave hours sha11 convert such
sick leave hours into personal leave hours it accord-
ance with the fo nnula developed and amended from time
to time by the city manager and set out in the city's
Personnel Policy. In the event that an e.*nployee
ceases to be classified under the ~?anagement Pay Plan
or General Services, but remains ir. the employ of the
city, that e_~nplovee's oersonal leave sha11 be~converted
• back to the then applicable sick leave benefit in
reverse aaDlicatron of the above_Tnent~oned formula then
in effect..'
Passed by the City Cour_cil of the City of Richfield,
??innesota, this day of 1°83.
John hamiltcr., '~aycr
r„ J S 7, .
--1`~
Sylvia 3ergh, City Clerk
-~
CITX OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 129
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Respect for Law Week Proclamation
The Optimist Club and their members sponsor and support
programs aimed at combating crime and disrespect for law
through year-round efforts.
"Respect for Law Week" has been set for the week of
May 1-?, 1983, and attached to this council letter is a copy
of a "Respect for Law Week Proclamation". Council Member
• Ludeman, Chairman of this committee for the Richfield Optim-
ists, will be present to accept the proclamation on behalf
of the Optimist Club at the April 25, 1983 city council
meetincr.
Respectfully submitted,
t
Karl Nollenberger
City Manacrer
Kit/ej a
•
"RFSP~CT 1=UR LAGI G)~~K"
PRUCLA~'~tATIUPJ
~1~I~R~AS, ctc~.me and ~..th e{~{~ec~ upon the .2~.ve~ and pnop-
ex~ty o{~ auh c~.~~.zen~s .i~ o{~ u.tma~.t concenn, and .the can~~.nued
e~~an~~ o{~ aun .2aca.2 govexnmen~t, c~.~t~.zen~5' ongan~zaz~.on~s
and ~nd~.v~.dua.2~5 .to curb ~th~.~ pxob.~em ~.~ gnea~2y appnec~a~ed,
and
G1N~R~AS, the pnab2em~ o{~ cxtime Mauch and a~{~ec~t a~~
~5egmen~t~5 a~ oun ~soc~,e~ty, and can undexm~.ne and epode the
mana2 and econam~.c ~,~neng~th~s a{~ oun cammun~.~~.e~5 and ~he~n
c~.~t~.zen~ ti~ unabated, and
GJN~R~AS, pub.~~,c awaxene~~ and de~texm.~na.t~.an ~o ma~n-
• ~a~.n the {~a~.~h ~.n .the pne~5enva~~.on o~ haw and anden and
the appxec~.a~~.on aU the ~.mpan~ance o{~ haw en~oxcemen.t
a{~ U~,cen~s and ~the~.n xo.~e ~n pxe~5exv~.ng ~oc~.a.~ ondex ~in a
den,ocnacy ~.~ evenyone'~s ne~spon~s~.b~..~~.~ty, and
(~HFR~AS, UpZ~.m~.~~t C.Lub~s and ~the~.n membetc~ con.t~.nue
~ta ~pon~ax and ~uppon~t pnagtcam~5 a~.med a~ comba~~.ng cn~.me
and d~.~ne~pec~ ion .haw ~thnough yeah-haund eU~on~~.
NUGI, TN~R~PUR~, 8~ IT R~SULV~D .that I, Jahn Ham~.~~ton,
Mayon o{~ the C~~ty a~ R~.ch{~~e.~d, do pxoc.~a~.m .the weef~ a{y
"~1ay 1 -7, 1983 a~ R~SP~CT 1=UR LAG! ~V~~K and do ja~.n wti~h the
Up~~m~~~~5 ~.n caxny.~ng the me~5~age a/ Re~pec~t {pox Law ~ta
o~then c~.~t~.zen~s, and by example, exenc~.~e ne~5pon~~.b~e c~.~~.-
zen~h~p.
DUNS a~t the C~.~ty o~ R~.ch{~~,e.2d, !.1~.nne~o~ta, ~h~.~s 25th
day o{y Apn~.~, 1983.
•
o n amti on ~~fayan
~`
r:
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 128
~~
~ Agenda April 25, 1983
~,
The Honorable Mayor ~~
and ~7
Members of the City Council ~
City of Richfield
~~
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Amending Section
2.03 of the City Charter, Relating to
Terms of Office of City Council Members
First Reading.
Attached to this council letter is a copy of a Transmittal
Order received from the Richfield Charter Commission, request-
ing that the city council consider amending Section 2.03 of
the City Charter relating to the terms of office of elective
officers of the city. The amendment would delete the phrase
"the Mayor shall serve for a term of two years and the at-large
and district council members shall serve for a term of three
years." and adds the phrase "The terms of office of mayor and
all other members of the council shall be three years." The
purpose of the charter amendment is to make the term of the
office of Mayor (which is presently two-years) three years,
the same as the terms of the other members of the city council.
It is recommended that
approval to this ordinance
hearing and second reading
meeting.
the city council give first reading
amendment, and schedule the public
for the May 9, 1983 city council
Respectfully submitted,
_.. ~~~
Karl Nollenberger
City :`~?anager
KN/eja
cc: City Clerk
•
•
'TRANSMITTAL ORDER
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of ti:e Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
We, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting members of
the Charter Coirnniss ion of the City of Richfield , Minnesota , do hereby
respectfully submit and deliver to you the attached proposed ordinance
amending Section of the City Charter of the City of Richfield.
We Hereby respectfully proposed, reCGT~3T'~V' cu id ~u,.~""fLit for advt~tiGl'i,
by unani-r~us vote of the City Council and approval by the Mayor of the
City, the attached proposed ordinance this day of
19. .'
• ,
j' ~' (Y. ' ~'d-. '*.
i r - /~
_ ',
CHARTER A1`~IENDN!ENT ORDINANCE NO.
CHARTER Al`~1ENDMENT ORDINANCE RELATING TO
TERMS OF OFFICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
AMENDING SECTION 2.03 OF THE RICHFIELD
CITY CHARTER
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 2.03 of the City Charter of the
City of Richfield relating to elective officers of the city is
hereby amended to provide as follows:
"Sec. 2.03. Elective Officers. The council shall be composed
of a mayor ar_d four council members all of whom shall be registered
voters. Commencing with 1981 election the offices of mayor and
at-large council member shall be filled by election at large.
Commencing with the 1982 election the offices of the three
district council members shall be elected from apportioned council
districts in which they reside. ~'he-mailer-shad-serve-fer-a-term-
ef-tare-pears-aril-t~:e-at-lare~e-anc3-elistr~et-eet~r~e~l-me:~ni~ers-sl~a~l
serve-fer-a-term-es-three-years- The terms of office of mayor
and all other members of the council shall be three nears. The
regular term of an office commences on January 1 next following
the general election at which balloting for the full term of tr,e
office occurs. A candidate for the office of district council
member must reside while seeking election and while serving in
office within the district from which he or she is elected. A
council member who was elected under the at large system prior
to the 1981 election and whose term has not expired may continue
in office until his term expires. Prior to :March 15, 1982, and
every time there is a United States Census thereafter, the city
council shall be ordinance establish compact and continuous
council districts to be apportioned by population as nearly equal
as practicable."
Section 2. Effective Date This ordinance is effective
ninety (9D) da_ys after its publication, subject to the provisions
of Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subdivision 7.
Passed by the City Council cf the City of Richfield, Minnesota
this day of 1983.
John Hamilton Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk
.~5.
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
/(`'~~ ~
~~ ~ J
J
~ ~
r.. ~, ~
The Honorable Mayor '~ ~
an d ;.
Members of the City Council ~ ~
City of Richfield
L~ m~
Council Members:
Council Letter No. 127
Agenda April 25, 1983
Subject: Public Hearing - Additional Sidewalk Con-
struction, 1983 Project C.P. 782
At the March 28, 1983 city council meeting, the city coun-
cil accepted the preliminary engineer's report and scheduled a
public hearing to be held on April 25, 1983 for the proposed
construction of a sidewalk on the north side of 64th Street
from Portland Avenue to Nicollet Avenue.
Installation of a sidewalk at this location was not included
in the original sidewalk policy; consideration of this location
• was initiated by council request. The estimated cost to con-
struct this sidewalk is $33,198. Construction of this sidewalk
would require the removal of four trees and the installation of
330 square feet of retaining wall. Because 64th Street is not
designated as a Municipal State Aid Street, less than 20 per-
cent of the cost will be paid by special assessments, with the
remainder to be paid by the city's portion of the special assess-
ment bond. The estimated residential assessment is $2.54/assess-
able foot. In residential areas, the assessment will be figured
from the short side of the lots that abut the improvement.
At the close of the public hearing, it is recommended that
the city council pass the attached resolution ordering the
project.
Respectfully submitted,
1 %
Karl Nollenberaer
City Manager
KN/eja
•
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR
ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION - C.P. 782
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the
28th day of March, 1983, fixed a date for a council hearing on
the proposed construction of concrete sidewalk at the following
location:
On Side From To
64th Street North Portland Avenue Nicollet Avenue
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weekly
publications of the required notice was given as required by law
and the hearing was held thereon on the 25th day of April, 1983,
at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity
to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the
council resolution adopted the 28th day of March, 1983;
2. City Engineer, Michael J. Eastling, is hereby
designated as the engineer for this improvement.
He shall prepare plans and specifications for the
making of such improvement.
Adopted by the council this 25th day of April, 1983.
John Hamilton,Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 126
Agenda April 25, 1983
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Causes of
Vacancies on the Planning Commission.
First Reading.
Last November, the city council appointed Vern Luettinger
to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City cf Rich-
field. At the same time, the council decided to retain Mr.
Luettinger as a member of the Richfield Planning Commission.
The city staff checked the legality of a person remaining on
both commissions, and found no conflict at that time.
Recently, the city attorney was undergoing a training
session with the planning commission ar,d came across a hereto-
fore forgotten section of the ordinance creating the planning
commission which indicated that the cause of a vacancy on the
planning commission is the "election or appointment to a public
office." It could be interpreted that the HRA is a public office.
It is Mr. LeFevere's recollection that the intent of the ordin-
ance was that the office not be an "elective public office".
For that reason, he has drafted an ordinance amendment, which is
attached to this council letter, which would clarify the position
on that matter.
It is recommended that the city council give this ordinance
amendment first reading and schedule the public hearing for
May 9, 1983.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl 4cllenberaer
City Manager
• cc: Community Development Director
City Clerk
KN/ej a
•
A'~FNDN`~ENT TO CN.APTER III,
PART VII, SECTION 3.68,
SUBDIVISION 7, PARAGRAPH (F)
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chanter III, Part VII, Section 3.68, Subdivision 7, sub-
paragraph (f) relating to causes of vacancies on the
planning commission of the city, is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"(f) Election or appointment to a an elective public
office."
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this
day of 1982.
.. John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk
~9
C
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 125
April 11, 1983
The Honorable Mayor.
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richf field
Council Members:
Subject: Financial Report, Year Ending
December 31, 1982
The financial report for the period ending December 31,
1982 has been completed by the Department of Administrative
Services. The full financial report is not available at this
point, due to the audit provision which calls for our books to
be audited by Cummins, Keegan and Company subsequent to April
15. As you are aware, we received a reduced audit fee as a
result of the delay in audit time. However, the city charter
• of the City of Richfield requires that a financial report be
submitted to the city council for year-end information by
April 10 of each year.
Some of the highlights of the 1982 financial statements
which will be presented at the April 11, 1983 city council meet-
ing are as follows. The General Fund of the city at year end
1982 had a fund balance of $2,323,00, compared t.o -52,066,000
at the end of 1981. It was anticipated that the fund balance
on December 31, 1982 would be $2,178,000. The fund balance in-
crease of $145,000 over budget resulted from reduced expendi-
tures in the city's operating departments. Total revenues for
the year came in $19,000 under budget, while expenditures came
in $164,000 under budget. The reduction in revenues was more
than offset by the reduced expenditures, providing an increased
fund balance. Even with the increased fund balance, there will
still be a cash deficit in the General Fund by June, 1983. This
will necessitate requesting an advance of property tax payments
from Hennepin County in order to make regular accounts payable
payments during the month of June.
Revenues in the General Fund were $19,000 below budget in
1982 due mainly to the announced cutback in local government
aid and homestead credit in December, 1982. This reduction
amounted to $80,000 of reduced revenue to the city, which was
not anticipated at the time of budget preparation. In addition,
• a reimbursement for the warning system construction was not
received in 1982 in the amount of $22,500, nor was the expend-
iture made. Those items will reappear in the 1983 budget for
Council Letter No. 125 -2-
April 5, 1983
both revenues and expenditures.
• Cable television franchise fees came in $15,000 over the
budgeted revenue of $19,000. In addition, interest income,
which was budgeted in the amount of $54,000, exceeded estimates
by $49,000. Swimming pool and ice arena receipts were off by
$6,000 and $15,000 respectively. However, a direct offset in
expenditures was also achieved in order to keep the General Fund
net cost approximately the same. Without the last minute cutback
of local government aid and homestead credit payments by the
state government, the city would have experienced a $62,000 revenue
gain over its original budget. Normally, the city does have in-
creases in certain areas, and decreases in other areas which
offset each other. However, in 1982 we were not able to make
up the full amount of the last minute cutbacks in state shared
revenues.
Expenditures in the General Fund came in under budget by
$164,000. The Legislative/Executive Department was under budgeted
by $25,000, due mainly to decreased legal fees in the latter part
of the year. You may recall that we increased the legal budget
in September, due to expenditures coming in at a greater than
normal level. In the last few months of the year, the expendi-
tures were reduced to a more normalized rate. The Administra-
tive Services Department came within $7,600 of a $597,000 budget.
The Public Safety Department was under expended by $51,000 due
• mainly to the capital outlay of $30,000 for a warning system
which was not expended in 1982. Likewise, the revenue reimburse-
ment from the federal government was not received in 1982. The
Community Development Department budget was within $100 of its
total $308,000 budget. The Community Services Department came
in $80,000 under budget in a variety of different divisions,
but it should be remembered that the swimming pool and ice arena
showed decreased revenues. These are offsetting expenditure
reductions to those revenue reductions. All of the departments
showed a continued commitment to the cost containment program
which began a few years ago. As a result we were able to en-
hance our cash flow position as of the end of the year.
Compared to projections, the Water Utility Fund experienced
an extremely positive financial position at the end of 1982.
It was expected that the cash position would have a year-end
cash deficit of $129,000, but instead the deficit was only X150.
At the same time, accounts receivable in the Water Fund increased
by $77,000 due largely to delinquent water bills. This is a
disturbing trend which may take future action by the city
council. Retained earnings of the Water Fund increased from
$386,000 to $695,000. It was anticipated that retained earnings
would only increase to $583,000 by December 31, 1982. In addi-
tion, during 1982 the city made its last payment to the Re-
stricted Asset Fund for redemption of bonds. There is now enough
money set aside in the Restricted Assets of the Water Fund to pay
• off the remaining long term bonds of the city. Revenues in the
Water Fund were $67,000 higher than originally anticipated, with
expenditures being $31,000 lower than originally anticipated,
Council Letter No. 125 -3- April 5, 1983
for a net income increase of $91,000. As a result for the first
time in six years, the water Fund will be in the black in 1983.
This will allow the city to begin its capital improvement program
for water meters and other needed improvements at the aging water
plant structure, on a pay-as-you-go basis.
The Sewer Fund showed profits in 1982 of $155,613, slightly
higher than budget for the year. As a result the actual fund
balance of $965,202 was up slightly over budget. However, the
cash flow in the Sewer Fund took a negative trend in 1982 for
the first time in a while. At year end, the cash balance was
$30,000 in the red. This was caused by the purchase of a house
for storm drainage purposes with the resale delayed until 1983.
As a result, the $70,000 resale proceeds are not in the year end
figures. In addition, accounts receivables increased in 1982 by
$20,000 as persons did not pay their accounts. This will bear
watching for future financial conditions in the Sewer Fund.
Aslo the Golf Course Fund owes $230,000 to the Sewer Fund which
will begin to be paid back in the near future.
The Municipal Golf Course Fund experienced a measure of
success in 1982, compared to anticipation. We expected to have
a net income loss of $7~I,000, but instead experienced only $24,000
loss. This $48,000 betterment of financial condition has gone a
• long ways toward helping the Golf Course Fund establish itself.
Revenues were $77,000 higher than originally expected, with ex-
penses $29,000 higher than originally expected. The additional
play which resulted in the extra revenues also caused some extra
additonal expenditures, but as indicated, the income was $48,000
greater than anticipated. The fund balance at the end of 1982
of $71,000 in the hole compared to our estimated budget of $118,000
in the hole at the end of 1982. In addition, a negative cash
position budgeted of $83,000 for the end of 1982 was actually
a positive cash of $14,000. The cash flow was $102,000 greater
than expected. If thegolf course operation produces a positive
cash flow in 1983, as budgeted for, we will be in an excellent
position to come out of a negative retained earnings ar.d pay back
the sewer fund for cash borrowed. With the positive financial
status of the Golf Course Fund, we were able to eliminate the
liquor fund reserve of $90,000 which was required under the bond
retirement legal requirements in the event that there were not
sufficient restricted assets to pay two times debt service in
the Golf Course Fund. Operating revenues in the Golf Course Fund
were up by X1.66,000 for a 45% increase over 1981. Operating ex-
penditures were up by only $35,000.
The Municipal Liquor Operation had a very successful year
in 1982. The total revenue of $488,000 compared to $269,000
in 1981. Based on comparisons with our other major competitors,
. it appears that St. Anthony had total profits in 1982 of $440,000
and Edina had total profits of around $350,000. If those figures
are accurate in their final calculations Richfield would return
to first place as most profitable liquor operation in the State
I~
U
CITY CF ftICi:FIELD, i~!I"; "c^`~
GEi•1ERAL FU~dD
C^`~'.PARATIVE BALF.Iv'CE SHEET
December ?1, 1982 and 1981
t~S..E T .,
Casa - ~;;l~dule 1
Imprest cash and change funds -Schedule 1
Ir.v~str:ents - Schedule 2
Receivables:
SpeeiGl assessments
accounts
DLie from other governments:
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Ric•r,field
Richfield School District ~~280
ienr.epin County
State of "~linr,esotU
City of ti':innetcnka
Metropolitan Council
Federal Government
South Hennepin Human Services Council
Inventory, at cost
Prepaid expenses
Total Assets
T ~ r T-~-G~c nnjn n~D C:?L.^"ICS
L~ yt3I~~11L., -,. L rU~,
i Liabilities
Vouchers payable
;accrued salaries payable
Accrued FICA payable
Accrued PERA payable
Duo to other governments:
City of Eloomington
Richfield School District 'E2~?0
City of Minneapolis
Hennepin County
Revenue colloctec ir, advance
Tot;~l Liabilities
Fund Balance:
RCS:'rVed I'Or
Encumbrances
Ir~~orest cash and orange funds
Inventory
Unreserved:
Uncesibnated
Total Fund Es'_~noe
• 1CT.c:l L1= bl~ltle5 an:. C UnG =alcn :°_
1882
$ 105 ,196
950
2,185,aL~
484
;.0,995
19 ,155
19 , 524
?7 429
2?,112
1,16;'
5,074
.,.,~
..2 , c~~
1,410
!'.12
:"2,511-: ,08.5
'~ 70 , 061
83,905
?1,35
1,704
~,,J50
191 ,09~
15 ,221
05n
1,410
-, ~~c
c,~22,. _.
FC R'°`
~, ..
181
4 ~,F R
°; ,~__~
950
1 ,2~0 , ~~5~t
1,005
4R 404
_,
17 091
12 '~
,5~_
12,~~15
1 ,000,487
~,!„)~
2,927
1,18
6~8
~2,2n ,7 ?
., 4 a
101 ,904
5~`~,214
11,560
5,051
32.197
4 X318
<F0
J , i J
Lin
~,
?,.=, 72~
:,
7 ~ ~7n
95^~
1 ?18
~~
~0~7 „L1
See accG[npany~ng not°S t0 flnanclai StOt°~1;OntS
CITY CF RI CEIF'yL,; , ,•'I°fPiES~TA
GEI~;ERnL FU~;D FGR!~' F-1
n-r ~ -'r
CTS lE~ P~ L ^r REVEivUES , E~{PEidDITUR
~c ES , Q-!dr C:-: ?.;!GLS
Ii! FUP;D 5t1L~~JCE - EUDGET r. 'ID ~C'i'.JP.L
Year Ended December 31, 19^2
`~iltfi Comparative Actual Amcunts for Year ^
~nred Dece::;ber 31 , 1981
1 i82
'1Uriance-
Final Fu~v~orGble 1981
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Actual
Revenues:
Taxes
X2,445,082
Y2,4~3,06t1
W 37,582
:1,931,002
Cable TV franchise foe 1;,;28 34,125 14,798
Lic~onses and permits 211,000 200,802 (10,198) 178 „74
?nter~overnmental ?,415,s57 3,344,155 (?1,202) 3,575,015
C.".aroes for services 54?,2G? ^10,910 (?2,2`3) 528,725
F ir.es and forfeits 148 ,15C 14~ ,571 (1 ,479) 11+3 „~'~
;~iscellaneous
50,500 ~~~
12~,~,;~
62,787
133,2oG
e.xpenditur? reir,:bursements 2;7,525 218,866 (18,059) 251,305
n
Total „evenues 1:31 155
7, , 7,162,291 (18,364) 5,742,210
c,xpenditure:
Legislative/Executive
373,507
31.8,049
25,458
320,309
Administrative Services 597,281 58°,61[7 7,5?4 526,511
public Safoty =,5r9,39~` 3,458,955 50,742 ?,181,4?,2
Community Development 308,372 308.25 97 806,%95
Community Service 2,422,514 2,3112,904 79,710 2,288,716
Total Expenditures 7,211 ,652 7,0>~7,811 153,;;41 5,6<3,557
Excess (Deficiency) of
Revenues over Expenditures
(?0 ,497)
1 14 ,480
1 ti4 , 977
108 ,549
Ct::er Financing Sources (Uses):
Transfer frcm Revenue Si.aring Fund-
"[oture Center operation 25 ,000
Patrolncn's salaries 20,000
Transfer from ~-iunicipal Liquor Fund 7u ,562
Transfer frcm ;tinter Utility Fund 20,190
Transfer from Sewer Utility Furd 10,692
Transfer to Central Garage-
Fire truck reser~~e
Tc` ~1 Other Financing Sources (Uses) 1?~U,t•.50
Excess cf Revenue and Other Sources
,,..,
over Expenditures and .;then Uses 99 °~`
Funa E~lance - Janaary 1
Fund ~~1Gn::e - Dcce::ber ;1
25 , ~~oc
20 , 000
~, 2
J4 ,/'.i
20 ,195
16,5;2
25 ,Goo
GO , 000
(.10 000 )
1~0 450 - 7,:..,~
,
244 , X30 14" „77 1 13 , 5t:c
,. ...FU 2 n,~~] ~7Q - ~ ~4 hlr,
J ,v i U ,~. / )~/ ,J
^~ nG
~, i~~,~12 :2,32%,>° 141~,?77 '2,C ,~ 9
See ~ccon;par.ying notes to financial statements
•
•
CITY OF RIC:-?FI~.,D, '~'I"i1ESC~t:
GEPIEP,AL EUiJD
SThTEP•~~iT OF ~ EVE.~ILES, COf~~PAPED TO BUDGET
Year Ended December 31, 1932
,tilt,', Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1981
1932
Taxes:
Current ~d valorem
Current ad valorem-fiscal disparities
Delin~~u:;nt ad valcre:;:
Penalties, interest and forfeited
t4x sales
Total
Less debt service funds
property taxes
TGta1. TaXeS
Cable T'J Fra:nchise r Pe
Licenses and Permits:
.:usiness licenses
ilonbusiness licenses ar.d permits
Total Licenses ar.d Perr::its
Intergovernmental Revenue:
Feder^l:
Civil defense reimbursement
Energy grant
F
~~~.tc .
Local government aid
Attached machinery aid
:iou,estead credit
Reduced assessment credit
LGw officer training
State-aid street :~aintenance
Diseased tree control
Corr,pre'r~ensive planning
',darning system reir;~bursement
Ski trails
R:.ciprocal fire prcgrzm
Traffic sign inventory
Energy grant
Surcharge rebate
County:
Cc;~l•~unity n2a~th services
.''`Oblle llCmes
Ccr;rr;ut;ity Development Bloc's Grant
Total Intergovernmental Revenue
~'ariance-
~'inal Favorable 1981
Budget Actual ( Unfavorable) Actual
X2,415,994 x„2,446,9?2 ~ 30,978 ~1,ac0,351
2;5 OQ8 r 5,283 (305) 150,541
35 , OC0 ';3 , 419 3,'119 31 , 967
9,000 7,90 (1,010) 3,14,
2, X90 ,082 2,733 ,~~~ 37 ,532 2,181 ,OC2
250,000 250,000 250,000
2,446,Ov2 2,483,664 37,582 1,931,002
19 X28
~J 24 , 125 14,'798
91,G00 iC4,167 1?,167 ?3,915
120,000 96,635 (23,?65) 105,05°
_11,000 200,802 (10,193) 178,974
15 , 3? 5
~~c 1 ~n
2, ~;~, =~
2,000
c~~ X00
~/ ) J
a5 ~?5C
22 , 500
1 2''"
~+
~~
1 '`CG
i6 ,533
,,..
uo}
11,437
2,927
2,23 i ,715
2, 1S0
1,C3~,737
1~ Leo
~, •>~
53
;? ;. Q
14 2?8
5,555
~:n
~.,
!-~6
1 , 330
5,166
4,415
~5 j1~,
323
!1 '~lii.
2 ,154 , 020'
2,i~6
;42,001
10,360
.. .
5 <nC
~~~
:5,°15
7,1111
1,27?
13,520
~7 1 ,0~.3
!4,q7~ ~7,1~~
~~,415,36? ~3,3~1~=, 165
(ll5,11C)
1~6
(34 499)
10 X60
~ ~' 6C
7,J
165
7,41 i
(22,500)
(1 ACC)
~~
13,520
(1)
;3
~,'~~
(7 7(~C~)
~ i ,G ~
S(71,202) 3,5?5,015
i
vLiv i~_... C Ulv V
!1' ~„~'~(T ~ T~~.~~ i. /mar lf~ i~ T. T /''!I~iTT~~ ~r_
ST~.TE~~.~,~ ~ CF R~1, ~:~U~S , ~~.,, ~P._RLD TC EUDGE. (.,'.:,•; i ~ .~E c,DJ
Year Ended Dece:rb~vr 31 , i^-~2
~r4ittl COP.]parat].Ve :dual .~TOUr~tS fOr `!ear Ended DeC~mber `1, 1~1
C'.^.arges for Services:
~en2ral gevernmer,t
Deputy Registrar
Pub' is SGfety
Community Development
CG:^runity S~ rvices
~~a1th
paNi\ aid n'~GreGtiGn
Swi,]].mino pool
Le GreI1G
Mature Center
CG:a~]ur.ity C•~nter
TOtal Ci]ar~::~S fcr SerV1CeS
roes and Forfeits:
'~'ur:icipal court fines
FGrfe~ted ~Daii
• :iigh~way patrol fines
License p~r,Glties
TG;.GI F1nes C:nv Ctrl ~~ is
'M'iscellaneous Revenues:
nter~st
Pent
SrcCldl aSSeSS~T]ents
Sale cf property
Sale cf partial lots
Insurance claims and refunds
Ccntributicns
Recovery-damage to city property
Ct~]cr
Total '~?iscellaneGUS Revenues
Expenditure Reitrbursements:
HR: and L/'r./I~; project
Ct:]er reimcurse<<]ents
Total expenditure ReimbursE~rents
Total Revenues
1^`.2
'I~_:riance-
Final ravorGbie 1981
Cudgel :~.ctual. (Lnfavcrable) P-.dual
NCO `'' 7,5~''~ ~~ (1,402)
1 °C , CCO 180 , 500 500
42,400 18,123 (24,272)
19,500 22,cC0 J~!!r,Q
Gn,C 466 (?t~ )
23,245 1!-x,277 (R,~~ 8)
56 HOC ;~ °98 72 ^^0
00,005 54,160 (5,845)
21,325 198,187 (15,138)
8.,575 11,074 2 ~c8.
. .
19,75~~ 24,;22 ~~,903
140,000 11.4,992 (5,008)
2 , 850 4 „95 2 ,145
4~50~~ 3,240 (1,254)
300 ?,4?3 2,6?3
148,150 140,071 (1,479)
5j1 ,OCC 102 ,:334 ,~8 ~ ~?4
4,000 4,131 131
4'' ~~7
1,500 1,47° (21)
,000 1,500 5CC
, u
2 3L~ `~C
C,~~
10 ?h~
,~~
,.J ~.~..
10 ~`~
nN
~l./l. ~Cv
~~ ^~ 123,0.7 ~G,"J~
~V , i'v C
2JC~c~S 21,,205 (14 ti5)
~_
0,600 2,::,CO (4,C~CC)
c'~ 131 1 ~5 ;"'' 1' % `'9 1 ~' 1 `= ;5--' 1
ce c:000r~,panylnE,~ nOt°S t0 flnuriCiCl Staterr,ents
21,420
145 773
2^,1C~
^7
~~ .
2,692
21,022
~? ,532
48,741
191 ,591
?,~J4
10,744
~~;~ ,725
135,300
2,385
2,cn7
~ ~.~,~
14? ^4
,iJ
111,486
7,7c~
2 yl
4,502
293
1 ,401
i ~I ~
, v ~
1 ~~ ,200
91 ,602
~c ~~n
2~1 ,~~i7
X0,742,210
•
•
CITY Cc 1;I~~FIELD, ~•I"i~1ESCTA
GE;~IERAL FU~iD
ST~.TEN~CPdT Or EXPEiJDITliRES, CC^~'PRED TG ~'JDGET
Year Ended December 31, 1982
`rylth CGniparative Actual .^-.mounts fcr Year Ended DeCe:rbor 31 , 1981
1QR,2
Variarce-
Fina1 Favorable
Budget %CtUal (Unfavorable)
LEGISLATIVE/EXECUTIVE:
"~yor-Council
Personal services
Other services and c"arg°s
Supplies
C&pitai cuti~y
TotGi
~~ 27 ,185 4~ 26 ,772
25,327 23,802
5,955 4,166
214 214
5° ,581 55 ,014
~~ 412
1 , 455
i,.
~' ~9
3,007
Other Agencies:
!-;urnan Rights Ccrrlnission
iuman Service Council
Cable TV Conlnission
Storefront
Project Charlie
C;~:arter Ccrr~ission
Total
City ,Manager:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
C4pital outlay
Total
Legal:
PerSGnal S;;rV1CES
Other services and charges
Supplies
Tcta1
Total Le~islativ;,/Ex°cutive
E~_D~~T?dISTR".TIVE SERVICES:
.dministraticn:
Personal services
Other services and ci~aroes
Supplies
TOta1
1,i00 1,094
2,972 2,972
14,328 23,230
C7,iU~ G7,~Ul:
3,160 ,,16C
~5C 87
49,420 58,043
91,023 82,532
15,707 16,514
2,808 1,531
70~
-~-
11.1 ,238 ~OO,o77
i'j,6~r 27,58'
125 ,78 105 , 709
100 2?
1~ 134,315
,~~~ ~48 ~v4~
71,2r~ ~1 ~~5
2,197 12,196
~ ~~~,
_,~70 C,i~J
7F,C22 ~F,020
6
CS„'02)
`-7 J
\ J ,' C j /
~ ~~
~»~1
193
1,277
X00
1- n ~T
107
19 , 569
7.
19 ,~53
25,45
1
1
1981
!-:C~UaI
1; ~' , 029
24 , 2~~0
5,217
r12
G~,? r
u~
~.,
7~~
2,712
17 ,280
26 , 400
3,100
goo
r_n
~,~ , :;13
~~~4
~~2,~
~ i~Fl
1, ,-.~~
2,212
102,169
25,x'88
cj~,,492
1C~ ,9 `C
;~
~0 ~n4
J ,UJ
11,214
2,553
7'~ ,581
:ITY OF RIC~iFIF~D, "!I'~'.~:ESCT~1
GErJERA.L F UPJD FCF•'°': c' -3
STATEN'~.E`!T OF EXPEt~~(DITL'RES, C0~'~PfiRED TC BUDGET (COtdTI~:UED)
Year Ended Decer,:bsr 31 , i982
`,,lith Comparative actual :lmounts for Your Ended Decerlber 31, 1981
1;82
VarlGnCe-
Final Favorable 1981
Budgot 9ctual (Unfavorable) '?ctuai
aDi~:INISTRATIVE SERVICES: (Continued)
Personnel:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
Cupit~l outlay
'I'Otal
~ 47 , 570 ~ 47 , 57~G ;v -
10 ,430 8 , 391 2 ,089
2,700 2,53° 161
1:J0 1n6 504
01,u5C~ 58,606 2,754
w 41 ,991
11,759
2~1~c
55,s?go
Youth Employment -Counseling:
Personal services 18 ,803 15 ,635 2,168 17 ,;41
Other services and charges 3,975 3,818 157 3,038
Supplies 553 613 50 652
Total 2?,441 21,066 2,375 21,531
Finance
Personal services 94,305 94,x•05 - ?6,017
Other services and charges 45,200 45,059 141 20,52
Supplies 6,095 4,745 1,350 5,022
Capital outlay 10;
Total 146 , 100 1!'4 ,609 1 ,491 112 ,330
City Clerk:
?~=rsonai services
142,7°0
142,776
4
116,6?3
Other services and charges 1,8,623 18,621 2 9,695
Supplies 14,940 14,938 2 7,175
~l
C~.pit~ outlay 23C 269 11 ='?"
--~
Total 17~, 623 1';'6 , 50' 1:~ 1?3 ,41
r.ssessin~:
Personal services
16,381
16,192
189
53,534
Other services and charges 93,561'+ 93,179 ?85 64,524
Supplies ~' 700
~, ? , 3'
2. ~ 419 4 , ='~0
--~
Capital outlay =~1
1
Tota
11 <,045
112,652
99~
12:;,'39
Tcta1' ad^:inistrativ0 Servlcas 501 ~"
,~~ 1 - __ 64^
"~ , ~" ^ 634
~ , ~~" 611
~_o , .
PUBLIC SFFETY:
Sdrrinistrative S~srvices:
Person~.i se~rices 341 ,305 ='41 ,3C4 1 289,770
Other services and charges 55,5e5 65,501 4 52,728
Supplies 16 , 3C0 .o ,2~a ;~ ~ , X72
Capioai outlay `50 ~9~ ~
Total
~ Gn
-+23 , 5~.~
h II,~? ^~~
, ~ ~ 7
_. 151 ^
i~ I G
.- 3~; ,
CITY CF RIC:iFILZD, ;°lI:d~;ESCTA
GEi~'ERAL FU~dD
STATC,I~;/P~T CF EYPEid~ITURES, CCi°':PAREC TO PUDGET (CC?(TIi~.UED)
Year Ended December ?1, 1832
E
riit" Ccrr,parative Actual Amounts fcr Year r,dod Docerrbsr 31 , 1881
1g3C
Variance-
Final r avorable 1881
Pudgot =actual (UrfsvorGble) ~:ctual
PUELIC SE^.FETY: (Continued)
Pclice Protection:
Perscnal services w.
w1,411,271 ~, r7 ~
:~1,4C5,7,., ^ G I I
,,-.g5 d` ~ Q
..1,2~,;,,~7~~
Ot~~er services and c"arses 255,760 255,532 7~? 311,;.75
Supplies 2~,' ,710 ~" ,50C 3 ,210 30 ,063
Capital outlay 2,500 1,116 1,334 3,876
Total 1 ,597 ,2!11 1 ,587 ,074 10,167 1 ,59!! ,298
Fire Protection:
Perscnal services ;72,417 972,387 2G (301,019
Other services and charges 73,110 73,070 40 110,735
Supplies 17 ,950 16 ,144 1 ,506 20 ,991
Capital outlay
1 ~,t12
Tctal 11 ,0~,~477 1 ,C 1 ,911 1 ,5~ 93',337
E:ner;ency Services:
Perscnal ServlCOS 5,530 0,575 ~ 8,277
Other services and charges 13,~'=25 12,1C2 1,32? 1!,023
Supplies r
3,22 ~
1,g o
1,22
g
3,227
Capital outlay 30,500 670 29,330 740
Total 52,730 20,34 32,387 27,267
Inspecticn:
Personal services 133,542 12~,03C 5,512 12,433
tither services and charges 131,305 130,556 1,148 140,235
Supplies 1,030 1,025 4 1,274
Capital cutlay 6,523 5,523 ^3
Total X72 ,gOC 26~ ,2~^ ` ,565 270 ,010
Total Public S~=:fety ?,509,Sg8 a,µ53,;;5 5J„~42 ,131,'~~'2
CC^~'~~IUr;ITY DEVELOPME~lT:
^.d;ninistraticr,
Personal services =~8 , ~ 1 C 4n , 331 29 4? , 1 C6
Other services ar.d charges 4,024 4,023 1 13,052
Supplies °1
_ ~1 ~;~
.~~
capital cutlay 114
Tonal ,c15 :~, ~:;~ _, ,~
Planning and Zoning:
Personal servicos :°,~;2 ~=,;63 " 57,39a
Other services and
Supplies charges 5,'774
1,700 ;,740
1,69 34
4 ,630
u,20~
Capital outlay 770
Total > 67 , i 46 ,. 67 ,104 :'~2 ,~ 66 , 497
CITY CF RICt;FTEL' 1~1I?'d?; ..,S:;TA
GE?;ERAL FU?;D FCRN'. F-
STATE~"EiYT CF EXPE'IDITURES, CC':"''PARED TC ~iJDGET (CCPiTI:'iUED)
Year Edd Dece~~er 31 , 1932
',v`ith Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1931
1982
Var~_nce-
Final Favorable 1981
Bu~:nd :':dual (Unfavorable) Actual
CC!°'.~U~IITY DE~JELCP^ -^iT : (Continued )
EnVin:;erin5:
Personal services a 48 , 962 :~ '-48 , 94~ ? 14 Y 52 , 672
Cther services and charges 5,373 5,369 ~~ 10,318
St:pplies 1 ,!;6C 1 ,45 % ~ 1 ,946
Capitol outlay 1,!+15 1,415 282
Total 57,210 j7 ,1~9 %1 -~ ,21
cicusing Authority:
Personal services 130,890 130,337 3 117,714
Cther services end c~:arges 291 290 1 <~5
Total 131 , 181 131 ,177 4 11 ~' , 049
Total Corrrnunity Development 308 , ?52 308 ,255 97 306 , 599
CC~'~".U?diTY SERVICES:
...::~itilstratlCn
Personal service
~Cther servlces and
charges 105,220
12,057 101,809
11,955 3,411
92 101,035
20,036
tiupclies 3,792 2,495 1,297 2,1°9
Capital outlay 2,760 1,;89,8 862 1,08^
Tdal 123,c29 113,167 5,652 i2~,~43
Tee Arena:
Perscnai services 98,641 95,536 2,1C~' ~6,1~77
Ct.".er services and ci,arges 81,201 ;2,260 S,?41 81,552
Supplies 1',',580 15,8'83 1,597 18,028
C~:pital outlay n39
Total 1~'' 425
1 , 18t1 b7"
, J 12 X45
J I lc~ nq„
, i
J I , v
,
Swi~~:ing Pool:
Personal services 55,327 r3,~29 2,-198 ~ia c<n
Cther services nd charges 25 440 2? 577 1 ~^? ~'' ~'~
Supplies 10,900 9,1?? 1,727 12,112
Total c2 , 157 ~?^ , 079 ~~ , 083 97 , 75
Corrrnunity Center:
Personal services 1~T,437 1?3,59'-~ 4 _
~~'~'~ 122 ~
,S_.3
Other services and charges 35,119 33,017 2,102 29,143
Supplies 16 ,251 15 ,91° 333 3 ,644
CrpitGl outlay 10,;3`)
Tctai ~ 13c,,.n'' ,82,52^ ... '',273 ,. 171,50
CI1 GF ?ICHFIELD, i'I:'~'i:ESGT~~.
GEi~ERAL FU:'dD
ST1'hTr.'~:EidT OF EXPEidLiTURr,S, CG;~P~^.RED TC BUDGET (CC?~1T1iU ED)
Year ended Dece„ber ? 1 , 1;~"2
';dith Comparative actual Amounts for Year Enu~d D~c~mber ?i 19° 1
1982
Variance-
Final Favorable 1981
Budget ~~ctuai (t!rfavorable) actual
COM~~'UidTTY EnVICES: (Continued)
Recreation:
°2rsor,al serv~;:es ~~ 13? , 9~~ ~.~ 12'9 , 80~~ ~ 4 , 152 124 , 9 ~2
Other services and charges 61,138 59,143 1,995 54,5;,8
Supplies 15,785 12,841 2,944 13,0113
Capital outlay ?00 172 128. 458
Total 211,191 201,952 9,229 20?,c21
Nature Center:
Personal services 149 ,047 148 ,0''-,~? ,r54 12; ,797
Cther services and charges 19,426 1R ,265 1,i01 20,023,
Supplies 10,285 °,872 413 5,859
Capital outlay 0,70G 3,65 2,8?5 2,496
Total 185 , 45 180 , 095 5 , 363 160 ,775
Forestry:
• Personal services 91 'ol
~~. ~'' 150
i !! 241
~ ." q C
=0
,
Other services and charges 40,230 30,848 9,382 58,702
:;upplles 1,7C~ 1 ~3G
> 193 3 ~j
>'
Capital cutl~:y ,123 2,040 1,OR~ 'Z3
TOCaI 136 , 469 121 , 570 i !' , X99 14 , 322
L/H/`I '~1aint2nance
Perscn~:l ser~~~ices (2,055) (2,156) 101 0,133)
'Gtilcr SerV1Ce5 and ChcrQeS 1,687 1,158 529 6J5
Supplies x,500 oR^ 2,911 2,104
Capital outlay ~?0
Tot~:l 3,2?~ ;30,x) 3,,41 2^~
Governrcent Buildings:
Personal services 69,707 09,178 529 -'5,727
Other services and charges 96,412 ;9,072 340 ~~2,369
Supplies 10,915 ;,247 1,558 `,,361
Capital outlay 1 ,214 ~ ~ 318 2,715
10:,21 ~., i ,2`e ,~q' JCS ~~-
~JJ ~~~,' 1~2
Par'.~c ~iaint:,r,ance.
P2rsonGl ..crvices %9,64 277,255 2,;93 271,c31
Ot~er services and charges
.~ 88 792
, ~~ ~'~
..~, , 2w 12
~ 98 911
f
Supplies 23,200 %5,310 2,c90 ?1,707
Capital cutlGy 2'',14 24,3^ 2,:)04 18,09?
T ,.1 ~,7, ~~4 ~; ~~ 1 ~ 1 ~5 ~co Y 42 <t;2
i
•
CTil vC I?TCr'~i '_~ /, iT*~i..iti..cuT
~EP~;ER~,L FU~r~ F~.B,.. _ _~
STATEh:~~T CF EXPE;DITU°ES, CGM°~-'.RED TC BUDGET (CC~~~Ti~IUEL)
Year Ended Decerlber 3 1 , 1982
',v"ith Co;,?parative ;dual '~r:~ounts for Year Ended Decemder ?1, 1981
19x2
~Iariance-
Fin~l Favcrbie 1~Q1
Budget Actual ~Unfavcrble) tictuGl
C;,'~f~'U",TTY SEfiVICES: (Continued)
:: vreLtJ:
Perscr.al services ~ G~?,~~~n ~~ 2~~2,G16 `° (2,'~1C')
~t:~:er s::rvices and ChGrgeS ? ~ 1 ,2C;; ;~C,795 10,413
Supplies 52,000 50,190 1,°iC
CUpital outlay 1,5x0 1,~c3 1~7
Total 578 ,O1 ~ 5?4 ,5^~~ ? ,'-450
Tetal Ccr~^.iunity Services ?_,422,51'-! 2,~42,90~= 79,?1C
Total ~xperiditures :7,211 ,85% ~7,C4?,011 ~1b3jS41
See accompanying notes to financial statements
~' 21i~,019
305 y<4
2~J`
3:~ , ~~ .~
cc~
J
~ <4 ~F~
_.
2,298,715
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
WATER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE S~IEET
December 31, 1982 and 1981
ASSETS 1982 1981
Current Assets:
Accounts receivable:
Accounts $ 2,288 $ 585
Service charges:
Billed 175,468 141,127
Certified to county auditor 54,379 31,951
Unbilled services 120,506 101,254
Due from other governments-
State of Minnesota 83
Inventory at cost 6,996 4,477
Total Current Assets 359,637 279,477
Restricted Assets
Cash with fiscal agent 93,716 616
General bond debt service:
Cash - Schedule 1 21,447 5,397
Investments - Schedule 2 400,000 578,000
Total Restricted Assets 515,163 584,013
Deferred Assets:
Connection c;iarges receivable:
• Edina hookups 1,800 1,800
Private properties 1,383 1,005
Deferred charges - LOGIS contract 8,446 11,261
,Total Deferred Assets 11,629 14,066
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land 44,500 44,500
Buildings 1,468,519 1,387,954
Office equipment 11,771 10,657
Machinery and equipment 1,674,748 1,632,700
Other improvements 6,539,488 6,539,488
9,739,E 9,615,299
Less accumulated depreciation 3,400,260 3,229,547
Net Property, Plant and Equipment 6,338,766 6,385,752
Total Assets $7,225,195 $7 ,2 3,30
See accornpanying notes to financial statements
FORM K-9
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY 1982
Current Liabilities (Payable from current assets):
Cash deficiency - Schedule 1 $ 150
VoucY~ers payable 30,838
Accrued salaries payable 4,492
Accrued FICA payable
Accrued PERA payable
Accrued vacation 16,458
Contracts payable - Construction 11,798
Contracts - LOGIS (due in one year) 2,815
Due to other funds:
Special assessment funds 31,379
Total Current Liabilities (Payable from current assets) 97.93a
Current Liabilities (Payable from restricted assets):
Matured bonds payable 89,000
Matured interest payable 4,716
Accrued interest payable 8,467
Bonds payable-General Obligation (due within one year) 188,000
Total Current Liabilities (Payable from restricted assets) 290,183
Long-term Liabilities (Payable from deferred assets):
Deferred revenues - connection charges:
Edina hookups 1,800
i Private properties 1,383
Contract LOGIS (net of current portion) 5,631
Total Long-term Liabilities (Payable from deferred assets) 8,814
Long-term Liabilities:
~
269
518
deposits
Customer~ ,
Bonds payable-General Obligation: (Net of current portion)
Water Bonds of 1961
000
85
Water Bonds of 1962 ,
000
160
Water Bonds of 1963 ,
269
7
Total Long-term Liabilities ,
19
1 0
1
Total Liabilities ,
,
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital:
Property owners' (special assessments)
3,196,500
Municipality (aid in construction) 1,918,861
Federal grant 30,000
Total Contributed Capital 5,145,361
Retained Earnings:
Reserved for revenue bond retirement 224,980
Unreserved 694,658
Total Retained Earnings 919, 38
Total Fund Equity 6,064,99°
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $7,225,195
1981
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
WATER UTILITY FUND FORM K-12
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
Year Ended December 31, 1982 and 1981
1982 1981
Operating Revenues:
Charges for services:
Water sales metered
$1,196,851
$ 938,829
Water sales nonmetered 4,762 4,797
Water availability 2,597 2,777
Connection charges 130
433
8 32
420
Customer services
Sale of material and supplies ,
1,236 1,188
Equipment rentals 11 16
Certification fee 2,700 1,711
Customer service charge 72,174 72,287
Total Charges for Services 1,288,894 1,022,057
Miscellaneous Reveues:
Construction labor reimbursement
3,890
738
Other
Total Miscellaneous Revenues 13
3,903 10
748
Total Operating Revenues 1,292,797 1,022,815
Operating Expenses:
288
363
266,048
Personal services
Other services and charges ,
278,278 240,336
•
Supplies 184,660 148,724
Depreciation 190,354 189,428
Total Operating Expenses 941,655 844,536
Operating Income 351,142 178,279
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest
Recovery - Damage to city property
Gain on sale of asset
Interest expense
Fiscal agents' fees
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)
Income before Operating Transfers
See accompanying notes to financial statements
294 -
1,869 485
2,260
(26,215) (37,024)
(458) (476)
(22,250) (37,015)
$ 328,892 $ 141,264
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1982 and 1981
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash
Change fund
Total Cash - Schedule 1
Investments
Accounts receivable:
Service charges:
Billed
Unbilled services
Prepaid expense - storm sewer study
Due from other funds - Golf Course
Due from other governments:
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission:
Operating cost adjustment (1981 and 1982)
Total Current Assets
•
Deferred Assets:
Deferred charges - LOGIS contract
Special assessments receivable
Due from other governments:
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Operating cost adjustment (1982 and 1981)
Reserve .capacity
Interceptor acquisition contract
Total Deferred Assets
Long-'Perm Assets:
Long-term loan receivable - Golf Course
Property and Equipment:
Land
Buildings
Office equipment
Machinery and equipment
Other improvements
Construction in progress '
Less accumulated depreciation
Net Property and Equipment
Total Assets
See accompanying notes to financial statements
1982
$ -
500
500
172
96,766
3,450
(2,291)
98,597
8,446
84
58,063
62,219
1,684,216
1,814,028
~~n nnn
9,050
479,245
4,093
64 , 256
41,043
69 ,403
7,090
'IRR 77~
478,318
$2,620,943
1981
$ 14,137
500
- 14 ,~37
175 , 000
172
77,743
11 ,678
2,550
(35,583)
246 ,197
11 ,262
484
(2,291)
65,584
1,747,363
1,822,402
170,000
9,050
298,431
4,093
64 , 256
41,ou3
416,873
'17~ ~Qri
244,277
$2,482,876
FORM K-15
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
• Current Liabilities:
Cash deficiency - Schedule 1
Vouchers payable
Accrued Salaries payable
Accrued FICA payable
Accrued PERA payable
Accrued vacation
Contract - LOGIS (due in one year}
Due to other governments:
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
1882
$ 29,585
42,494
2,539
1981
g ,187
2,815
8,836
Total Current Liabilities __95,456
Long-term Liabilities:
Deferred revenues:
Revaluation gain - Metropolitan Waste Control
interceptor acquisition 1,423,544
Contract - LOGIS (net of current portion) 5,631
Total Long-term Liabilities 1,429,175
l`J
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital:
Municipality
Retained earnings:
Reserve for change fund
Unreserved
Total Retained Earnings
Total Fund Equity
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
1,524,631
131,110
500
964 , 702
965 ,202
1,096,312
X2,620,943
7,531
1,592
547
246
5,158
2,816
17 , 900
1,502,630
„ ,,„,
1,511,076
1,528,976
131,110
500
822 ,790
953,900
X2,482,876
n
LJ
CITY OF RIC1iFIELD, ;;II'?'E~OTA
~E~~:~R UTILITY FU1~dn
C~::PAP,AT11,'E .1~~1L1°`E~IT ,: REVE'1Or.: !',I:D E P I ,:~.,
Ye~;r End~:d ~~cerrbcr 31 , 1;`;2 and 1'?;-,1
1~~~2
Qp:=rating Rev^nues:
Charges for services:
~car~er user cilarLes
Reserve opacity charges
Pctir^r connection charges
:~.~'~'vJer Certl.fl.c.'atlOn Char~C'S
Customer service charge
Tot~;l Ch~.r~es for :;ervic•~s
I~iisc:~Laneous Revenues:
Construction labor and equipment rental
~~.le of material
Total ?Miscellaneous R-avenues
To~al Operating Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Cost o services rendered:
?Metro :;ewer c'narges
Personal services
Cther service and charges
SuppLics
1;epreClctlon
Total Operating Expenses
Operatinj (Less)
idonoperatin~ Revenues:
Gain on sale of asset:
Amortization on deferred revaluation rain
Interest:
Deferred current value credit
R~~scrve capacity
Investments
Ass~ssm~nts
Golf course
Total Nonoperatino Revenues
Income before Operating Transfers
~:~~ accomp.:nying notes to financial statements
~7°1,13
22,525
2,700
uy,236
851 ,07~I
20 tl
21
225
851,2p9
609,876
159 , 850
66,61
9,~~12
16 ,176
871,95
(20,686)
r 0 ~ :,
~.-1:.
131
~;672~ot13
6~l , 2~)~
50~
1 , 6c~5
~l0,61~1
780,020
P,~~.
?18
1,156
781,136
610,731
13?,236
91,705
9,737
9,7~i2
855,151
C7~~,965)
79 , 055 79 , 036
69,395 72,32
2,206 1,872
3,877 3?,4r+7
35 66
16,200 2,550
175,299 139,3~~
155,61' ^115,x,79
CITY OF RICHFIELD, N'iINNESCTA
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND
COMPARATIVE BALATJCE SHEET
December 31, 1982 and 1981
1982 1981
•
ASSETS
Current Assets:
100
14
$ -
Cash - Schedule 1 $ ,
Change fund - Schedule 475 475
383
Accounts receivable 728
19 7,912
Inventory ,
216
Prepaid expenses
Total Current Assets 34,519 8,770
Restricted Assets:
Cash - construction account - Schedule 1
-
48,295
Cash - Revenue bond debt service - Schedule 1 11,217 92,895
Investments - Schedule 2 230,000 130,000
Accrued interest receivable 32 8,961
Total Restricted Assets 241,249 280,152
Deferred Assets:
Unamortized discount on bonds
16,714
17,651
Property and Equipment:
865
57
57,865
Land
Buildings ,
389,451 381,702
•
Office equipment 4,213 4,122
Machinery and equipment 203,664 203,064
Other improvements 1,228,893 1,203,794
Construction in process 11,605 16,060
1, 9~ 5,391 1, 07
Less accumulated depreciation 189,171 100,778
Net Property and Equipment 1,706,520 1,765,829
Total Assets
See accompanying notes to financial statements
u1,999,002 $2,072,402
•
FORT K-20
U
1982 1981
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities (Payable from Current Assets):
Cash deficiency $ $ 70,034
Vouchers payable 2,193 5,933
Accrued salaries payable 1,699 1,615
Accrued FICA payable 473
Accrued PERA payable 132
Accrued vacation 4,248 5,425
Accrued interest payable- Sewer Fund 3,450 2,550
Total Current Liabilities
(payable from current assets) 11,590 86,162
Current Liabilities (Payable from Restricted Assets):
Accrued interest payable 13,049 13,375
Bonds payable (due in one year) 35,000 35,000
Total Current Liabilities
(payable from restricted assets) 48,049 48,375
Long-term Liabilities
Bonds payable (due after one year) 1,200,000 1,235,000
Loan payable - Sewer Utility Fune 230,000 170,000
Total Long-Term Liabilities 1,430,000 1,405,000
Total Liabilities 1,5 5,415 1,540,799
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital
Municipality
:Retained Earnings:
Reserved for change fund
Reserved for revenue bond retirement
Unreserved
Total Retained Earnings
Total Fund Equity
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
579,689 579,689
475 475
193,200 183,482
(264,001) (230,781)
(70,326) (46,824)
509,243 532,865
$1,999,002 $2,072,402
LJ
CITY OF RICHFIELD, t~INt~1ESOTA
1`'?UNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND FORM K-21
COMPAP,ATIVE STATEMEIJT OF REVEtJ UES,
EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
Year Ended December 31, 1982 and 1981
1982 1981
Sales and Cost of Sales:
341.
$ 87
$ 63,765
Sales
Cost of sales ,
48,737 38,181
Gross Profit 38,604 25,584
Operating Revenues:
238
443
303,438
User charge ,
42
481 329,022
Net Revenues ,
Operating Expenses:
Personal services
188,257
183,747
Other services and charges 81,456
47
679 64,959
38,637
Supplies
Depreciation ,
88,560 83,650
Total Operating Expenses 405,952 370,993
Operating Income (Loss) 75,890 (41,971)
• Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
28
990
30,672
Interest , 318
Tnsurance claim 588 501
Miscellaneous
Interest and fiscal charges (95,337) (84,417)
P.mortization of bond interest (937) (937)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) (67,696) (53,863)
(Loss) before cumulative effect of changes
834)
(95
in accounting method ,
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting method (2,930)
Net Income (Loss) 8,194 (98,764)
Other Changes in Retained Earnings:
G
696)
(31
arage
Equipment transfer to Central ,
Net Decrease in Retained Earnings (23,502)
Retained Earnings - January 1 (46,824) 51,940
Retained Earnings December 31 $(70,326) $(46,824)
See accompanying notes to financial statements
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MIN?JESCTA
h;UP]ICIPAL LIQUOR FUtdD
COh;PARATIVE STATEh;EPdT OF REVENUES AP]D EXPENSES
Year Ended December 31, 1982 and 1981
U
•
Sales
Cost of Sales:
Inventory, January 1
Purchases
Freight
Total Merchandise Available for Sale
Less: Inventory, December 31
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit on Sales
Percentage of Gross Profit to Sales
Less: Operating Revenue Deductions Before
Depreciation:
Operating Expense
Operating Income Before Depreciation
Less: Depreciation (straight line method)
Operating Income
J
~~ Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest - investments
Cigarette commissions
Telephone commissions
Rents
Gain on sale of equipment
Insurance claims
Loss from burglary
Bad checks
Cash over (short)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)
Net Income Before Operating Transfers
See accompanying notes to financial statements
Total
1982 1981
$5,517,763 $5,587,620
648,481 836,012
4,211,502 4,357,444
32 , 051 37 , 387
4,892,034 5,230,843
498,344 648,481
4,393,690 4,582,362
1,124,073 1,005,258
20.4 18.0%
486,341
43,931 272,494
36,858
442,410 235,636
41,213 35,542
755 1,954
252 319
8,112 500
100 448
3,360
(3,362)
(3,150) (3,040)
45,586 33,891
$ 487 , 995 $ 269 , 527
FOP,I~? K-7
Lyndale Store Cedar Store Penn Store
1982 1981 1982 1981 1982 1981
$2,046,316 $2,086,556 $1,762,523 $1,805,786 $1,708,924 $1,695,278
269,177 307,947 203,742
1,550,066 1,643,113 1,368,572
12,551 14,599 9,003
1,831,794 1,965,659 1,581,317
175,008 269,177 186,394
1,656,786 1,696,482 1,394,923
389,530 390,074 367,600
19.0 18.7 20.9
230,156 265,750 218,175
•
159,374 124,324 149,425
15,958 15,226 14,925
143,416 109,098 134,500
291,654 175,562 236,411
1,394,755 1,292,864 1,319,576
11,044 10,497 11,744
1 ,697 ,453 1,478 ,923 1,567 ,731
203,742 136,942 175,562
1,493,711 1,341,981 1,392,169
312,075 366,943 303,109
17.3 21.5 17.9
242,691 189,401 224,323
69,384 177,542 78,785
~n I~n~ ~~ ntla 11 101
58,943 164,494 67,595
15,284 13,271 13,165 11,4$7 12,764 10,784
215 758 249 705 291 491
225 240 25 79 2
8,112 500
100 448
3,360 .
(3,362)
(1,179) (1,570) (1,393) (1,195) (578) (2'75)
(532) 71 (929) (511) (233) (1,392)
14,113 12,770 19,227 11,055 12,246 10,055
$ 157,529 $ 121,868 $ 153,727 $ 70,008 $ 176,740 $ 77,651
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND FORM K-4
COh1PARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1982 and 1981
1982 1981
ASSETS
Current Assets:
746
$ 15
$ 11,717
Cash
Imprest cash ,
150 150
Change funds 8,000 8,000
~
Total Cash - Schedule 1 23,E 19,8
Investments - Schedule 2 350,000 225,000
Accounts receivable 6 94
Inventory, at cost 498,344 648,481
Total Current Assets 872,246 893,442
Property and Equipment:
826
227
227,821
Land
Buildings ,
742,206 742,206
Office equipment 19,986 19,863
Machinery and equipment 221,253 214,690
Other improvements 94,215 87,695
1,305,48 1,292,275
Less accumulated depreciation 458,832 415,551
Net Property and Equipment 4 , 54 7 ,72
Total Assets $1,718,900 $1,770,166
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
•
Current Liabilities:
Vouchers payable
$ 257,305
$ 228,732
Accrued salaries payable 6,652 5,414
Accrued FICA payable 1,
8
Accrued PERA payable 5
9
Accrued vacation X7,782 1?,687
Deferred revenue 9
725
Deposit
Due to The Special Revenue Fund 143,434
Total Current Liabilities $ 292,473 $ 397,796
Fund Equity:
Retained Earnings:
Reserved for imprest cash and change funds 8,150 8,150
Reserved for revenue bond retirement 90,000
Unreserved 1,418,277 1,274,220
Total Retained Earnings 1,42 ,427 1,372,370
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $1,718,900 $1,770,166
See accompanying notes to financial statements
•