The URL can be used to link to this page

02-14-83 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 56 Agenda February 14. 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: When a Certificate of Conformance is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also presented to the individual designated by the city as primarily responsible for its having earned the certificate. Therefore, this certificate has been awarded to Jean Mitchell, Finance Coordinator. Ms. Mitchell will be present at the February 14, 1983 city council to receive this certificate. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Finance Coordinator KN/ej a ~y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 55 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Students In Government Days Mayor Hamilton and local school authorities have expressed an interest in establishing a "Students In Government Days" pro- gram in the City of Richfield. The purpose of the program would be to encourage interest in, and to educate high school students about the local government administrations. In their role of government officials, they will conduct a city council meeting and a school board meeting. The date for the city council meeting has been established as Monday, April 11. It is recommended that the city council support and endorse this program by adopting the attached resolution which establishes "Students In Government,Days" in the City of Richfield. Respectfully sbumitted, O Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja • S RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING "STUDENTS IN GOVERNMENT DAYS" IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD WHEREAS, the Richfield City Council and Richfield School District No. 280 have entered into a joint cooperative effort to establish a "Students in Government Days" program in the City ~of Richfield, and WHEREAS, it is the intent of this program to give students the opportunity to actively participate in all phases of local government administration, and WHEREAS, during Students in Gavernment Days", Richfield students will assume the roles of local government officials, reviewing and considering local issues up to, and including, the decision making process, and WHEREAS, this program is designed to increase the students knowledge and awareness of the local government system and to encourage their active participation in local government activities. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that there is hereby estab- lished a "Students In Government Days" program in the City of Richfield and School District No. 280, and that the period of April 11, 1983 through April 22, 1983 be so designated as "Students in Government Days". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that on Monday, April 11, 1983, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Richfield City Hall, Richfield High School students shall sit as a regular session of the Richfield City Council. DONE at the City of Richfield this 14th day of February, 1983. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia Bergh City Clerk /~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of C ity Manager Council Letter No. 54 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Approval of Sale of Tax Forfeited Land Hennepin County has requested that the City of Richfield approve the sale of four tax-forfeited parcels of land. These transactions would either be public sales or private sales to adjacent property owners. The four parcels are very narrow, ranging in width from approximately five to 7 feet in size. ThP parcels could not be developed because of their small size and would serve no public purposes. State statutes require that prior to any disposal of public- ly owned property by any public body, the Planning Commission must find that the disposal of property is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. The city council, by resolution adopted by a two-thirds vote, can dispense with this requirement when it its judgment, the proposed disposition of property has no relationship to the comprehensive plan. The sites in question are undevelopable by themselves because they are undersized and do not front or have access to streets. Because the sites are undevelopable, it is the opinion of the city staff that the proposed disposal of real property has no relationship to the comprehensive plan. It is recommended that the city council pass the attached resolution indicating that planning commission review is not required. It is further recommended that the city council in- dicate to Hennepin County city approval of the private sale of the parcels in question to adjacent property owners. The council should indicate to the county that the proposed sites are unde- velopable by themselves. Respectfully submitted, t n~ Karl Nollenberaer City Manager KN/eja RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION FINDING THAT LAND DISPOSITION HAS NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AUTHORIZING SAID DISPOSITION WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes 462.356 Subdivision 2 requires the Planning Commission must review all disposition of publicly-owned land by any public body within the city unless the City Council finds that the proposed disposition of property has no relationship with the city's comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has requested that Richfield approve of its disposition of tax-forfeited land, property identification numbers 26-028-24-33-0007, 34-028-24-23-0162, 34-028-24-23-0163, and 35-028-24-22-0069, by public auction for public sale to adjacent owners;. and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,. has reviewed the proposed disposition; and WHEREAS, the parcel in question cannot be developed because of non-compliance with local ordinances concerning lot size and access to public streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows: • 1. That the proposed dispositions have no relationship to the comprehensive plan because they cannot be developed except as part of an adjacent parcel. 2. That the City Council approves of the private sale to adjacent owners because the parcels cannot be improved because of non-compliance with local ordinances. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of 1983. :-. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk n c y. w `.. ,1 l: ; :., -_: aG~ ~ ~~ S~'f -p~ f ' ~~ ~~ ~/yO J, s ~ ~ r yy ~ ~. ._, _ : lg ~ ~`I ,,, -- u ~j,4 ~f ~e~• 11 ars ~ I r~~ ~ I f- r (t~, f ,- r .,' ~~{ ,`til n ,OiO ~:~ OO` .o n ~ O;air., ~ ,ti\ .n ~: a ~~..^. ~ f ". _ .. ti r5 . ~ , ~ D +~ 1 I ' ' ~' ~ - ~ ~~ . --~ Parcel in Question ' 26-028-24-33-0007 z3 „1• Q I _ ~OJ~iw iJ• ~ _ ~.._ Al ~ . _ ~. - .__ .. .t ~ .C a \~ :~~ .a•. r, O .r, 6 o a _ .~C:• ~ ~ ~C. ~ a.:.. .. .1C s \ ~ ;O;C ~ V ` ~~ ~ . ~~ k ti ~ N~ ~ 1, A°~' ~ O~S~ --e~-~-=- p,~ ~ .. 1~ 4 ' ~;~, ...-e -~' -•. ,~~ ,' _ -~ ~; y `C of ~~`1 ,: i i '~ s, Z LJ r a >~ 1' 17 ~ r ~ y ~•r. V C '/~ T ~, - r ~ A b .Z s 5 -- ~ - .. .~, ~ ` =~ .e1 t. ~~ J ~ ~~ ~i /~ •!`f 1 / y a C , ,~,'^ 2 ~ ~~ ~ j ,f . , ~ }; ~ ; $'; ,, N ~.0.. \~ j 1/ ~ w ~ ` / ` ~''~',J 1 ~- - - - Q.~1 a ~ \ t _ ,- C_+ . ~ '` =I~'3 '~, ,~~~,4 o _ ~ `~ ,A V, ~ 3 , ,. i '• ,, ,~ 0 Q J Y Q O 0 .~ p EAST ~ ~ s ~~ N r ~ i~ :::; .;boy; ;^,,.= _ L _ o ~• ~ V ~~ ia~`, ~- . r _ ~~, c } t- - - .~ _~_ ~ ~) ~ 4 i' i~ -~~~ 1~ 4 Ci EAST ~~ `' ~9 't's s t ..7Q/ Y ~ ~ ..`\~~ ,~ - - f " f - - f' ~~ . ~5 \ ~A ~ ' //Ry ~ rl gy;d r~\ ~~. ~ ~~ ~ f" ~w LC 1^ S6 O ~ 0:10, Q ~- ~ O 6 . t:, aa, . ~. . . o ,b.a ~ - .0~.. .. '- ~ `y ~ i ' ~'~;; ;6.x4' .~ ,6, ~2~. e:. EAST yY i.i a `•~ OV 7o t3. 33 i 7 ) ; ~ ~ a f . ~..y T ~-~: ~ A. r ~' -,~, r ` ~~i o X5 ` 3 ~ ~. - .a- ~ 4 •`• t~4: ~ »4c ~~::' \ V :w 1Q o ~:: ',,~~ '" 5~ ~~ '~" :4Go ~ V \ ,q1 , Ml r ' ,V~7j GQ i0 e ~, ~----, ^rC) , o i., ~` I m j4~O s• y> „ ti ~' ~~ ~~ tip, ~ 5~ ~ ~ ^j. r~ ~ r~-~ ~ ..o ~., _ ., 7~ , O , ~ ~ -~ ` _ _1 [ i C Fj~ p% ~ J , 'V ~ „ 3 c:\0 u~~ s. ~j~~) ~~ Q. a ~ \~ ~; •; 'e .. ~ ~ ---- f; ,,.~ , ,v) ~ ~ . ..o.i 1 ~' it?` ~ ^,. ~ :~ i^ ti 7 V t_~1~ ~Or} w ~~ L :. .: - aa•''~~ . s.e 7~i 1~; i~~e ~ '"e 0 N Al r~ w Q ~~ , Ql~ H r n J s r ¢ ..; ~~, o e ~~°% (;1`: 3 p. ~• ~ ~~ _ o ~ ~ 4` r (.~ .1~oC -~, O L \ N •) S(~ a -- ---- ' q,, t i ~g \, . ~.. ~ ~~ ~.-~ a s' / ' 3~~ 030 • zr :~ , .~ F .~ ACRES~t,.. 6"' r .s. i s • 33 \- ` ~ ~~ ~ ~~g ,- 2 -f a =t ~ ~ ~ - __ ., (S~l '8 A$1 (~ b ~ , ` y ~; ~ 6 /So) 3 A ~~4~ `5~ -- t5` j, io ~ -- ~ __ ' o ;4 ~ ~Si~ , ; o :~2~ ~ ~ .i3~,n ,~-~-; 2 ~ ~~..~.> a~ T ~ ~ O F '^ ,,``.. - " 1/ff .. _. W ~ I c N LLI Q o •~• r ~~4 .r '_ ,I~ ,~ 23 g1~ 2 s 2 2~ - `~ 3 ~- Z, ~,o ~.~ 4 Zo('~` 5 (q°l, ~o~~a 4 q~ 6 ~~ozi8 ~ ~q2~ ~ • +7~~0~ (q3) 8 i5, (g51.o r-i~+- - q~l , . e `~ ~s ~i .., ^~ F W, Q Z J _'i ?a ,cam. \ M '2~~a1 ~ `.y~ ~ `° `\~~ 1 -- , ~o~t~ Z _ i ~,> ~o (~jO~ 3 - -9 (U~ ~ d''', , 8 f~(L15 , ~`, ~~ r ~~3 6 m .. cV. 3 , - - - ~ ;~ ~ -~ , ~ l` ~ ~a ^~zA :3.3 c ~~Z ~' 2 ~ ~ 3 l.Q lal J ~^ ~5~ q ~.. ~~. ~~.~-~~ s r=. L _ -___~~ W a ~- ___~~ ~24 .. •2;..5 - '" r ~° -- ZZ~ 3 Zo~3~ ~ 5 (z~ iu~,41 i,~~ ° ;,. ,. z 4 73 ~c ~ u ~~4q ~4oi~; ~~ 3 ~~ Q .o ~ i4z1~ 4 r ~' 98 431` C~ ~1~ V ~ +: ~ ,a „~ ;~. ~ ..8.2 gt: i ~ ,c =' _~~~ ` ~_-`=:~3~ ~.. x(,53 .. ~ ~5~ ~ CZ> _ ~ , -~,~~;~~ ENO.0•~~5'44 ~ _ - -<< ;t 1 Parcels in Question.. 34-028-24-33-0162 016 3 4 e r. ~` ~. -. _ - 's % r ~ ~ w 23 (P~) -- rte, Z 3 -- `- - - Z:(82) r0 4 Zo `gil 5 ~~(~a~ (~a 8 s i6('((~ ~~ol o ;41151 (~27 ;, ~~ ~ yt / ~ ' . i ~ ~ • 21 4 ~f `~ ~ =s 2 _3 e7 - ., ~ Za E ° 2 5 ~ 20 t? . ~_: ~ .(6 ~ 4 i6 . . 2E8 ~ :3 ,, a ' N ~4a ,i ~ N :S~ 'c Je - :die 1 .3 ~ 3 a r 2 o ~ .r ;3,- ..+ ' ( L ~i.F. ~ -- ,n s ~ T ~ T .c b/~3 24 ~ m ` ~~1 n v -3-- _. --P ~ ~ _ ~ 4 ~ . _ ~o ~qm~ 5 ~59~~ 9.~ ~ ; k1~~ 6 ~; o - - r -- ~~ ^s ~a y ,Y w i '~ Y r'-. ;6r~..~ `k 9 G _ 5(LS>, i~l ,~ ?(531 SZ~:c s 0 0 Q ~ / -- -- Q _T_ V t IZ~ 4 _ `1~ q -~2(.~~ ~ ' -- - w •'Q y .3 6c 'e -s ~ ,3~ .D ~ , ~\~ 3 Q ~ n C - Y`~l\I ~,,~5 ~. ,~,s p y N 4 e. V ~ o ~ :. ~.•- ~- - (.~' ; ..' e : 5 R.L.S. Nai95 23 0 -- ~ =- 6'-' . , :`: ; 4 ~xi ~ % `titil~ _ ltd 9 < .G-~ je- ~ ;qol a~ :` • ~ z liJ ~ ~ - p~~`;~P~~:i~c~ 7 ~ Q.. ~. ~ ' ~ ~` LITSCHEM >. _ . ;. = .. _ - ~ .~ ,~~, o_ _ •;52 ~q; -. ~. - ~~` _ `7°1 - . ~ ~ ., - - ~ EAST =_ ._;V~~ Parcel in ~ -_ _, '~ •, = -- - Question ~~~~; _ . . _ <1' 35-028-24-22-0069 -,- g\`+' ~ ;\;~ .T, ,\ ~ ~~~ _ ~,1a A O : _~2~~ .. - - - i ~ - /~'~ •,~ ~ ,_ - _ ~,~) `til s:. ~ ' - -. y~~ a~; ~1 ~ -. ~ f~J ~O/ r .. ~ ~ ~'. - ~ ` ~` '. ~yy~ . y,, _ ,_:; ;_. `g4~ [,31 ~ -• = ~ ~„ ~ ~ V :__ _ _ ~ ~~~ ~,~ c ,~ ~~ 3 ~) ~ _ 3 Cr - - - EAST C '^ ~ ~ e7 _~__i_~ ,~k~, z;. ..gal `°'-~ - --- -- -. . - - - D N ~` 1 ``` .~, •. .:; tst -~- . ~ z~~~``~ ~q'~G ~ 1 tip , , ~ a ~ 3,,09 z - ' o,,~ , ~ ~ ~, ~~I e` , ~ .~ O 2 ~ ~n, _ ~ ' J ~~Ll ,. i+ 4~ w ° ~, ` QS• 3z~ Q ~ ~br.. ;. ~.~ EAST ~' - _..r.. _ ..ate, s .~~; , ~'.''~1 .. - ~ .. ~~ a.•°, Z ~~b~~ .. • • .~ ~ .. = ~ •_ •'C ~~ .. ~. ; ~ 6 :~i~j .:. ~ ~ - cn = - /~- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 53 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Resolution Relating to Capital Improvement Program A resolution, adopting the 1984-1988 Capital Improvement program, has been listed on the February 14, 1983 city council agenda. This CIP is the subject of the special city council study session at 5:30 p.m. on that evening. The resolution relating to the CIP has been listed as an agenda item for the council's consideration after your study session if you wish to act on it. Respectfully submitted, ~A~~~ arl Nollenberg~r City Manager KN/ ej a i P~'SOLUTION NO. '~ RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1.984-1988 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, a proposed Capital Improvement Program for the 1984-1988 period nas been prepared for review to the Planning Commission in accordance with charter requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendations and benefit of review of these proposed documents by the Planning Commission and has itself reviewed these. proposals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1984-1988 Capital Improvement Program is hereby approved and adopted subject to annual review and revision. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby • authorized and directed to initiate procedures which lead to more formal and detailed consideration of those projects in accordance with the aforementioned laws and practices. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 14th day of February, 1983. •John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk i ~~~ ~ • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 52 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Minutes, Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contract, Street Flush Tarik On Tuesday, February 1, 1983 bids were opened in accordance with legal requirements for the purchase of a street flusher. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulation is attached for city council review. One of the pieces of equipment scheduled for replacement in the adopted 1983 budget document for the central garage operation • is a street flusher truck, which is actually two component parts. One part of the equipment is the flush tank and other is a two ton tilt cab chassis truck. Together these components create a unit used in washing streets, street sweeping and ice rink flood- ing. This bid opening was for the flush tank. The new piece of equipment replaces a fully depreciated tank and truck. The estimate for this item was $23,800. One bides in the amount of $23,539 was received. The total budget for the entire unit is $55,300, and it is estimated that the. truck will cost about $31,500. The bid submitted for the street flusher tank meets spec if ications . It is recommended that the city council authorize the purchase of a street flusher tank from Ruffridge-Johnson Equip- ment Co., Inc. in the amount of $23,539. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Finance Coordinator • KN/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening February 1, 1983 Street Flusher Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for One Street Flusher, as advertised in the official newspaper on January 19, and 26, 1983. Present: Don Fondrick, Community Services Director Marshall Raaen, Technical Operations Coordinator Steve Devich, Acting Administrative Services Director Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk The following bid was submitted and read aloud: BIDDER AND BID SECURITY TOTAL BID COST • Ruffridge-Johnson Equipment, Minneapolis B.B. 5% $23,539 The City Clerk announced that the bid would be tabulated and considered at the regular city council meeting of February 14, 1983. Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk • ~ ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 51 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Cou ncil City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Purchases in Excess of $2,650 The city council has requested that the purchase of mer- chandise, materials, equipment or construction in amounts ex- ceeding $2,650, be approved by the city council. There is one such item on the February 14, 1983 city council agenda. Street Lights The city has assumed the responsibility for maintenance of the city's street lights and it is, therefore, necessary to purchase a supply of light bulbs and refractors. Three quota- tions were received. Lampco, on State Bid M3799, had light bulbs available for $4.20 each, but did not have any two-way glass refractors available; Viking Electric Company quoted light bulbs for $4.72 each, and two-way glass refractors for $20.50 each; Sterling Electric Company quoted light bulbs at $4.15 each, and two-way glass refractors at a unit price of $18.00. It...,is recommended that the city council authorize the purchase of 700 light bulbs at an amount of $4.15 each, and 20 two-way refractors at a price of $18.00 from Sterling Electric Company for a total purchase price of $3,265. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja cc: Finance Coordinator /~ ~ s CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 50 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: 1983 Sidewalk Construction, CP 782 In the fall of 1980, the city council established a side- walk policy which identified areas throughout the city where sidewalks should be installed. Listed below are the sections which are not yet completed: Arterial Streets Side From To Lyndale Avenue West 74th Street 76th Street Xerxes Avenue East 62nd Street 65th Street Collector Streets 73rd Street North Portland Ave. 12th Avenue Diagonal Boulevard North 12th Avenue Cedar Avenue 65th Street South Upton Avenue Xerxes Avenue 65th Street North Penn Avenue Russell Avenue 69th or 70th Street North Xerxes Avenue Humboldt Avenue In addition to these areas, the following segments of side- walk are being considered for construction to complete existing networks: Side From To Rae Drive West 65th Street 66th Street Vincent Avenue East 65th Street I 350' South 78th Street North 12th Avenue + 250" West 78th Street North 12th Avenue 13th Avenue 78th Street ~,'orth 14th Avenue Cedar Avenue Bloomington Avenue East 75th Street 76th Street 77th Street South Nicollet Avenue + 130' West 18th Avenue West 70th Street Diagonal Blvd. The attached map shows existing and proposed sidewalks. These sidewalk installations, in some cases, will present special con- siderations. The right-of-way, existing retaining walls, and slopes may make construction of some sections very costly. In order to better identify what areas should be constructed in 1983, the .city engineer will prepare a feasibility study and Council Letter No. 50 -2- February 14, 1983 preliminary engineering report and formulate a recommendation for council consideration at the February 28, 1983 city council meeting. This report will identify the special considerations and costs affecting construction. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution, ordering a preliminary engineering report on the sidewalk installations outlined above. After the February 28, 1983 city council review of the preliminary engineering report, the council can identify the specific sidewalk installations for 1983, and initiate the public hearing process for the proposed project. Respectfully submitted, ~X- ~.t~1~~~~ ~~ Karl Nollenberger City rlanager cc: City Engineer KN/eja • • w b o+f2 NSIONr15 0. 2Z t^ 12 vt02 Vi 61 AtOl13i0N0"1 ~3nr av03] ,~ vi et vtu Vt 91 ~ NOI9NINOOIB Vi SI i~ Vt bl hh Vt fl I\~ Vi I I i~'j~L vt O1 ~1~ 101113 o~rolNO ~~ 511BNn10] I'I` Hard I~~I._ oNr,>tva ~,fl ~3nr ]avllaoa ~~'JJJ~~~fff~(((~~~-,,,''' rit ill vib !~C _ NO1NIl] ~~~ o+f ; 'T vz ~ ((~~ SN3n 315 i y "' I 1 ~3nr 1311o]IN ~ 113051x16 ~~I .I NLa0Al1N3A1 Aan85'111d I I ~ LNx5r3ld .31 I aNVa9 I ~',, 131aasN I., P, 0131ia7] i~ 3nx 31xONAl ~ N]laale ~ Lnslae i;` I. LNOdna ;~~ NOSa3N3 1NOrt3ad _-_ i N 2 N N N H N I N N~ _; C s e a n ~ L s m ~ ~" ~ ~a ~ m ~ •~.-- r ::] ~ -~ o - ~ ~~_ JL _- ._J ~__ ~L~L_ Ir ~__' 2 yr O Y j J ~ 'l.1 o W W j ~J 1O106NnN 1="='= ~Nlnal 'jj~ ~ ^~ s3Nar ^'----' i r^ I - xON>t --' - Nx7aON 1~"~`J=-f a3nno `=-_-~-= ins NN3d •I N33n0 '.r ~ ^; • T.355na ~ f Nsola3NS `- ' I __ SxwONl I MOldn {~ -- - 1 - 1 1 1N 3]NIn ~; -- ---~ - -~ Nan9N5vM ~ 1 ri~_ ,1 3nx 53xa3x '-•r""~' - •~~ h ul A N 30 ~ b ~ W O s V ~~~ 8 ~v r; J ? a ~2 i ~ ~ N N .,j~ VI YI Uf N VI U~t IL._~I - W - La .. ' I~^ ~ ~ ~ w r n r~ n ti a T ~ P !~!r`S_~1 __ _ _ __- MOll3ao N01 -------- --------------------------u-~------(~-i ~(-I 3nv av03] -----~~~~_----~-_-7~;-_--'- t--~ x:/111 V191 _ ~-^ ^ I. • ~~ ~ NO19N1 wOQ79 __T ~----~ -- ^1 ~J~~~~~~ '~I~ r~~j (! ~~ 11( vt al ._~~_- ^: 5 n i ' ~~ ~ ~ `_. ~ ~ =- r-- lei '.. 101113 ~~ 1~~~ ~~ ~ OOr]IM] -,~-,r-, C, ~; ~ I-1t~ l-_ ~_. L-.~ ~.~ ~--~ ~ ~ ' ~ xavd '3nv ONrllaOd _ ,n I~_~I ~I~I_ ~~--=~ ~ ~ ~ NOl NII] ~ ~=-, CC; r-- II'I I~ '~ ~~ i ~ SN3n315 ~3nr 13110]IN _ ^ ~-^'~1,~_-- ~'-._ ~ .~ ~~`~~ 113051x18 ~u~ ~ ~~~~ ~-~, NLaoa1N3M ~~_? _L- ~-.- ~_ ~j-~b7 Aanesl~le ~`. I ~_~I - -_r:b..m-~.tz.- _ - - - ~ .--_~~ r- -r. - 1N7SV3ld I`- ~r~ "r '= - _ r,~, ~ I_~ ill ONSa9 "I C_r_ ~ ~_ ~=.~=_ ~~I s3laavN ~~--~~I _ -~'~'_ ~ ~l ~y,~ o131davo ~~"~ ,nv 31xONAl ~L~-_--r~-_- r-I ~l NOIa01tl -, ~V 1 ~ xxdl00 1 c 1 ! r-, r----, ~-- J a ~~ ~--!_ ,- nosa3N3 = `~ v~~ ~ =' ~ l iNOw3ai '~ ~. -~~ ____---~, '. ~' L ~_,~-J LOIOHwnM r-~ 13n~13~a M-S-'. 3M-o~T~~ _ -Su`~a._ -~-- __- --~', i ' l ~--+ ~~ s3war ~ ~ti~, ^~~,___ ^i - ^ -'~, 3nx !iN3d --- ---„ -;` ='~ ~l~ 11355 na Vii; ~~! _ _ _ - _. ~,.~ Nxola3N5 - - -+- _ - _ ~-~ --± stlwoNl __ ~-~ ~ '. I-- . -. _~ -~d_ J ~ Y .___-__-- yit~Wq~'~ Nani3MSVM +„a~ ~ ~. -------- --- - ~_--._-._. -. _.._r---_ --__ - --~-y 3nv S3xa3x ~< ~ N N N o, N N r N a v, u, .n ., ~ r ~a a a+ ~ ~ - ~. r r ~. n r- m _ ~ y o ~ ~ r C'^ Q1 p.i ~ ~ 3 3 Q~ Q~ .,-{ .~ U1 Lf1 ~i Q~ •ri UI ~ 0 N C2a •r{ w ~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .^ i ^ RESOLUTION NO. C~ RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR 1983 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION CP 782 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the following streets by the installation of sidewalk: ON Lyndale Avenue 73rd Street Diagonal Blvd. 65th Street 65th Street Xerxes Avenue Rae Drive Vincent Avenue 78th Street 78th Street 78th Street Bloomington Ave. 77th Street 18th Avenue 69th or 70th St. 76th Street SIDE FROM TO West 74th Street 76th Street North Portland Avenue 12th Avenue North 12th Avenue Cedar Avenue North Penn Avenue Russell Avenue South Upton Avenue Xerxes Avenue East 62nd Street 65th Street West 65th Street 66th Street East 65th Street I 350' South North 12th Avenue ± 250' West North 12th Avenue 13th Avenue North 14th Avenue Cedar Avenue East 75th Street 76th Street South Nicollet Avenue ± 130' West West 70th Street Diagonal Blvd. North Xerxes Avenue Humboldt Avenue South Xerxes Avenue Sheridan Avenue And to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to Michael J. Eastling, City Engineer, for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvememt is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in con- nection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of improvement as recommended. Adopted by the city council of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of February, 1983. ATTEST: John Hamilton, Mayor Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk • • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR 1983 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION CP OF 782 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the following streets by the installation of sidewalk: ON SIDE FROM Lyndale Avenue West 74th Street 73rd Street North Portland Avenue Diagonal Blvd. North 12th Avenue 65th Street North Penn Avenue 65th Street South Upton Avenue Xerxes Avenue East 62nd Street Rae Drive West 65th Street Vincent Avenue East 65th Street 78th Street North 12th Avenue 78th Street North 12th Avenue 78th Street North 14th Avenue Bloomington Avenue East 75th Street 77th Street South Nicollet Avenue 18th Avenue West 70th Street 69th or 70th St North Xerxes Avenue And to assess the benefited property for all the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Chapter 429, TO 76th Street 12th Avenue Cedar Avenue Russell Avenue Xerxes Avenue 65th Street 66th Street I 350' South ± 250' West 13th Avenue Cedar Avenue 76th Street ± 130' West Diagonal Blvd. Humboldt Avenue or a portion of Statutes, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to Michael J. Eastling, City Engineer, for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in con- nection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of improvement as recommended. Adopted by the city council of Richfield, Minnesota this 14th day of February, 1983. John Hamilton, Mayor • ATTEST: Sy via Bergh, City C er /~ fi CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 49 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: 1983 Alley Paving - City Project 786 In November, 1980, the city council established a policy providing for improvement of the city's alleys by concrete paving. This policy stipulates that an alley will be paved only upon receipt of a petition, signed by property owners represent- ing more than 50 per cent of the abutting footage, requesting such paving. The alley improvement projects are to be initiated on a yearly basis, with those alleys not paved, or scheduled to be paved, being subject to special assessments for the cost of on-going maintenance. To date, 34 of the city's 109 alleys have teen paved as a result of the petition process. The engineering division has received six valid (50% +) petitions for the 1983 alley program; one petition (alley between 72nd and 73rd Streets and Nicollet and First Avenues) was received with exactly 50 percent. The staff recommends that the petition with 50 per cent be included in the preliminary report and be considered by the city council at a public hearing. Thy city staff recommends that the city council pass the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a preliminary engineering report for the petitioned alleys. The preliminary report would be presented to the city council at the February 28, 1983 meeting, at which time a public hearing date will be set. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: City Engineer KN/ ej a RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING, CP 786 WHEREAS, petitions requesting the permanent paving of the following alleys have been received: Alley Between From To Nicollet Avenue and First Avenue 72nd Street 73rd Street Garfield Avenue and Lyndale Ave. 68th Street 69th Street Garfield Avenue and Lyndale Ave. 72nd Street 73rd Street Grand Avenue and Harriet Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Thomas Avenue and Upton Avenue 66th Street 67th Street Vincent Avenue and Upton Avenue 66th Street 67th Street Vincent Avenue and Upton Avenue 69th Street 70th Street And the petitions have been signed by the required percentage of owners of abutting property; BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council finds it appears necessary and desirable that the city make the assessable public improvement of permanent surfacing of the above mentioned alleys, prusuant to Minnesota • Statutes, Chapter 424; 2. A preliminary engineering report on such proposed assessable public improvement is required by law in the event that said improvement or any part thereof is especially assessed against the benefited property within the city. The city engineer is, therefore, authorized and directed to prepare a preliminary report of such proposed improvement and to submit the same to the City Council at the earliest convenient time; 3. Such report shall indicate the estimated cost of such proposed improvement, shall indicate whether such proposed improvement is feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 14th day of February, 1983. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: • Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk H H rn w inl v~ u~i Z_ ~ o c c d E_ ~ Q~ ~ o .u .°c a `W a ~--~--. ~,, ~ Y}- r HSIONVIS -~~~, ~ O ~ U $ .1. o o~aZ ~~~J~I ` ~ V z 11 ~I Ir ~I w 12 I f ' J ~~ - - ~ r =. ~ ~ w .n ~ ~ vi ~ ~ ~ Z i l L ~ z L JL J ~ N V16Z i~~~~_-J~~ ~. , n~ r r n ~ ~ ti n r mm i[_~ ~C _ _ __ ~_ _~ ~ r rQ MOll3dONOl ~ V - - 1- - MO11330NO1 '3nv av030 ~~' ~~- _ _ -_ I - _ZI?6_ _ _ _ _ _ __ 3nv atl030 ~/ Vi 81 V 1 L 1 ,.~._J ~ C.~ r- ~ ~ ~~.i ~ L~ l_~ ~_: =,1 I ~ ~ ~I V t L I oc~o~~~uD~~~~~~:.-J 1,1,E 4191' I V191 NOlONIW0018 `-J`-1`-~'~~'~~~`-~^--~'~I~'1-"'~ ~-~---~~J'I ~' NOlONI W0018 V191 ~~~~~~~ I~~~~~ ~l i~ VI SI 41 bl I~J~CCCIC~u~..,~~.ll ~ ~_ '~~~'~~~CC~~~~~~ ~~llI ~ VI bl 41 E I ~ r.-.-~ ~~ r-~. r- ~_ 1 ~' ' V I E I ,ham ~ ~-' ~~ ~' II _ ~-, ~-~ ~-~' ~j I I'~~ ~~'CCI~'I ~ ''~I~~~~~~'''~' ~'ll- 4 1 I I _~ ~'~ i^ r--~ I'I V1 II V101 ~I _ ~.-. ~~~L~~-~~ 'L~~t_~i-~~1_- ,~~I VJ 01 101113 '.~ _ I~I~~~! I ~i_~'I I~~'~- II ~ 101113 09tl91H0 ~ x ~~UU~;UL~.I~.~~~-~I~ ~~~i 4 ~_,~~f_^' f~ ~'ii O~JtlJIHJ Sf18Wf1100 ~ ~ J `-~~'~~J~'~-~'~-J J~'~~-'ice-I ~'i Sn8W 0109 Xavd I '~~~D~~L-_''L-~'L~'_J~_ '~Illr Xavd ONtl,XtlO I~ -i ~~~CC~C~C~~~~~~~I I''~,~ ~~~ aNtllXtlo 3ntl ONtlllaOd ~' I ~~rl r ~__~~_~I ~~'~-i ~'Il~ll~i~'li il~ I I ('~; ~ ~3ntl ONtlllaOd V1S '~ ~L_~~ 1I ~1~Ci~~~~~_flI ~: ~,~nf\\l ~ 41S I~ -- i NO1NIl0 ~ i^ `J ~J~~ ~ ~J~ N01NI10 „E ~ OC~LIJ ~~~ ~~C~L-~~_^L~~~L~'L_~I vas r~ ~~ rl- SN3n315 ~~~~~~ 'I~J~-, ~'~~~~I~^ SN3n31S - ,,, a --- - ~~ u'n~~ C---~,~~-~' C~ C~ .~I ~I^, ji Isl -3nv 1311001N ~ ~~~`~~~~~~, ~~-~-~~LL.I '3nv 1311 O91N I I JAI ill JL-~~I ~~~--,~~_~L~ ~~ 1130SItllB i t JJ~~ ~~ ~-i 1 1130 S1v18 I I~~ Ili J~-.'~I I ~~~-,'~ <_~111 H1a0M1N3M I N1a0M1N3M 1 CI ~ i '-1 C ~ ~I ~~,~'t-^ r--- I /aneslvd '~ ~l" ~~I I li~`r-ice-- I ~ ^ ~~y~~.~~-~. u~~"- I;I ~anesllld ONtla~J I ~ ~.I ~I_~lll~~ ~~~u~ I.~ II~I~ I ~~ : ~~~-~I"')y ~L~ril _~"I .-.- - il~ ONVa9 131aa vH I I ~~~~l~~I~//7~+~~ L ^~~___.... I'I ~JL-.~1" ~'~~I) ffi~~~~ ~~,~` I - ~'~,II~I 131aavH O1313atl0 ~-'. ~, ~/~~~tl ~ -~f-~~~I ~_~ ~ ~ ~ Ol31dav0 3nv 3lv0 NAl SCI ~~ ~,.;\ / ~ /~~ '~ ',~ `-tea •~i~ I I ~~6 ~~ ~ j A~, ~~~ _,`-" ~ .3nv 31vaN~1 H9laoly ''ir^'~ ~\~ig;~~`~-~~~~'~~ ~~-~~'y ~~'' HJlaaly 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~-" I~ `3roy ~ ~_, ~I I S7 1Nn~ae ~ 1/I , ~~ ~ ~~` ~,~~ 1NVeae _ xtldlo9 I I ~'J- - ~~ ~~~^~ ~ I~~' Ta ~~ V~ ~~,A '~- ~,,,r ~II xv3lo9 ~~ 1NOdna - i,~~ a ~, ~,~~~~u~~-I ~~'I~ n~~-' ~ I'~~~\ o x ~ r-I,~~ I -I ~, 1NOdna NOSa3w3 ,~ '.~.~ ~ ~ o a II ~~~ „~'~ 3 ~ ~/ ~L-~ ~~_ ~L--'~h ~a~~ Nosa3W3 /~ I 1NOW3a3 Fv ~f ~ ~ ~~ ' ~~ ~,y~l~~ ~~-~ ~ ~ 1NOW3ad ~ ~7d `___ aavalo I~ = --~~ fir--- ~ ~ ~ aatlalo 10108 Wf1H ~~ 3~nyp~ 3~ _=A~__~ __ 1O108W11H ~-i ~_ _ ~ I-- - ONlnal ~~~~-,r=-:=~~r-~~=-=r--~ ~~r-i---;~_ j''. .',".~ eNlnal SxoNH i~~.L-~~~~.~. -.L..,.~y,/~~` - -%,l` I 7~L S3wvr Ntl0a0W ~~~ ,~'~ I~~L=-~L ~L - = ~~ ~-~ :j Nv9a0W I ~_~l- .'I NO1M3N ~'~~ a3nll0 ~~ li ,-~~~~~I~_, .,_,,.-- ~;f a3nll0 3nv NN3d _ ~; ~--~ ~--1--~~-'_~ LJ.!~ ~~-,~-,,~,. r, '3nv NN3d N33n0 ~ 'v~~~~ Ira ~ ~_ ~L-~ ~' ~ `,'.~ -s~~-r' ~~--~ d.~ i, N3300 11355f1a ~i/~-- ~-~~~ u~~-^-r I~__J~ 1y _ f- -~~.r--~ ~J ll3SS 0a NtlOla3HS ~ ^~ - -~ ~ -~ - ~- Ntl01a3HS Sv WOHl ~" Sv WOHl 1N3JNIn I~~~--- _. r -_ ~~~ _ ~ ~ ~, ~ 1N39NIn NanBHSVM 1__ - J,~-- ~~ -y -~'.--^. ~ ~ '^_ _ _ } 3nv S3xa3X 3ntl S3xa3X ~-._ ~_ ..,.. _;-,~C~`-- __~_,.'_'.. ~.~' .__ ~~. = to N N N h h N N N N N N N N N N y vt h q 2~ 7 c c L ' L .. ~rv _ c c c ~ V) W tp i0 t0 N tp ~D n ~ r i- r r r r r r ~- O K M ~l I"l r~ ~--~ (~ ~ a a ~ '~ ~ Q ~ ~-I '~ x s~ w a ^ i I ~~ . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 48 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and ~ Members of the City Council City of Richfield ~' ~h .~ v '~ ~ ` Council Members: ~~~ Subject: Application for Arcade License, 7744 Morgan Avenue A: license application for an arcade to be 1 The Department of Public Safety has conducted a background investigation and found the Silver Ball Too, Ltd., to be a cer- tified Minnesota Corporation. Mr. Joshua Aaron is the President and sole officer and shareholder of this corporation. Mr. Aaron has no known criminal record. Silver Ball Too, Ltd., is a family amusement center estab- lishment and is currently licensed at three metropolitan locations: 8936 Highway 7, St. Louis Park; 1501 University Avenue S.E. , Minneapolis; and at 927 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis. The St. Louis Park establishment has approximately 20 token operated video amusement devices and two ccin operated pool tables. Con- tact was made with three surrounding businesses, also the St. Louis Park Police Department and it appears that the establishment is well managed and responsive to the concerns cf its patrons and the community. The Hennepin Avenue establishment in Minneapolis has 50 electronic amusement devices, six pinball machines, and four foosball machines, all coin operated. The manager on duty seemed to be actively supervising both the inside and outside of the premises. The establishment on University Avenue on the U of M campus has approximately 20 coin operated video devices and caters primarily to students. The establishment appeared to be actively supervised. The applicant has submitted a $1,000 corporate surety bond together with Articles of Incorporation and a preliminary prop- osal of numbers and types of amusement devices that would be Council Letter No. 48 -2- February 14, 1983 1. A second"exit from the basement, properly spaced; 2. Ceramic the in the existing bathrooms; 3. A one hour fire resistance assembly basement and the first floor with d stairways; Director, in which Z concur, that council action^on this license request be deferred. Respectfully submitted, O Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja 869-2401 ~NTAL~QU/PMENT &~ALES 869"78~ 2016 W. 78th STREET M/NNEAPOL/S. M/NN. 55423 City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue mouth. 1'~iinneapolis, Minnesota 55423 <Lttention: City :Manager 11e: Proposed lircade at 77~+4 T~2or~;an Dear Sir In regard to the hearing on 1{ebruary 1~+, 193 concerning the proT,~osed arcade at 77~f4 i~~lorgan t'lvenue South, hre object to this proposed site for the following reasons: This area already has a very coizjested ~~,arkin~T. problem. • oth Lindah~. Olds ar~d '~^Jalser l;uick do not furnish off street parkint `:~r their employees. `fhe proposed business ~~rould only increase the r• oblern . 'fhe Viking Center building is a Urood structure and almost burned down once before. `this type of business ti;Iould only increase the chance of fire. The younger age of. the business patrons of this type of business ~~,~ould increase the litter, noise and rowdiness of the area. This area is located a distance from the Police and Fire Departments. Sincerely, --•~ ,~~ Thomas A. ~:c~asy President LINDAHL ~ ~~: ~ " LDS ~~~ February 11, 1983 7900 WEST 78th STREET, M/NNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 -Phone 869-7414 City Council and City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 Dear Richfield Government People: We are aware of the public hearing scheduled for February I4, 19$3, relative to an application for the licensing of a proposed arcade at the Viking Shop- ping Center address of 7744 Morgan Avenue South in Ric}~field. As operators of a business that is directly across the street from that location, we are desirious of offering the following observations to that hearing. First, we are long-time business residents of Richfield. We are into our twenty-first year of operation at our same Richfield location. w'e currently . employ 122 employees within these operations, and have concern for our own and their business future and business operations environment. Because of these considerations, we are opposed to the granting of a license for the purposes as indicated for the 7744 Morgan Avenue South location. To be more specific, we oppose the granting of such license because of these concerns. TY'ie limited on-street parking that is available in our area, our concern for the security of our premises and our property, and the security of the merchandise that we store for others, that we inventory, and that we sell. As Richfield businessmen, we have no reasons whatsoever to oppose the licensing of any venture that would he beneficial to Richfield. However, a nee: vent~.~re that needs and can perhaps only exist because of outside transient vehicular traffic being brought into an area ill equipped to handle such traffic does not seem to make good neighborhood sense or good business sense. Our on-street parking is barely adequate for current conditions as they now exist, and to knowingly bring additional vehicular numbers into these facilities just doesn't seem sensible or practical. And - during the snow season - knowingly creating a situation that will bring considerable additional numbers of vehicles into the area seems very, very questionable. In addit;on, this same poten`_ial broad spectrum of outside transient traffic could also, very prcbably, instigate multiple security concerns for many in our neigzborriood. We are a unique m_xture of business and residential neighbors, and a concerted flow of transient traffic would not be anything ether than detrimental to us. Rich±ield Government People Page 2 February 11, 1983 It also seems obvious that an influx of transient "outside" vehicular traffic can only add to security and law enforcement problems in our neighborhood. No one in Richfield has higher regard for Richfield's law enforcement agencies than we do, but in these particular: times; the adding of additional potential enforcement burdens doesn't seem sensible or practical. Again, we oppase the granting of a license for the purposes currently applied for at the 7744 Morgan Avenue South location. It woulc seem that many other locations could be much more advantageous for such a venture. Yours truly, LINDAHL OLDSMObILE, INC. L ~~~ ~~~~~~i. R y Haberoth Ge:;.eral Operations Manager RH!ds 0 M N ~ ~ Lfl ^~ ~ ^ • ~ a ® Q~ f+ ^ ^~ O O • February 3, 1983 Dear Richfield Resident: On February 14, 1983 a public hearing will be conducted in the council chambers of Richfield City Ha11, 6700 ?ortland Ave. So., in regards to an application that has been submitted to the city to license an arcade. The site of the proposed arcade is 7744 Morgan Ave. So., the Viking Shopping Center. Mr. Joshua E. Aaron has submitted the application on behalf of a corporation by the name of Silver Ball Too, Ltd. Mr. Aaron, president of the corporation, is proposing, if licensed; to open the arcade some time in February of this year. He has also indicated that his establishment would house up to 40 electronic amusement devices, along with 5 kiddie rides, 2 pool tables, 2 foosball tables and vend- ing machines to dispense soft drir..~cs and candy. Silver Ba11 Too, Ltd. currently is licensed and cperates arcades in St. Louis Parr adjacent to the Knollwood Shopping Center, at i0th & Hennepin in Minneapolis and at 15th Ave. S.E. & University on the University of Minnesota campus. If you wish the opportunity to speak to the council regard- ing this matter please attend the council meeting scheduled for the 14th starting at 7:00 p.m. At this time we do nct 'know where on'the council agenda the hearing wil 1 be scheduled, however; if you call city hall on Monday the 14th at 869-7521 and ask for the City Manager's secretary, she will advise you where or_ the agenda the hearing has been scheduled and approximately what time it might get underway. If you have any questions please contact us at 856-5v6i. 1 ..Sincerely, Captain Ror. ' d J . Richardson Commander, Do~ice Division ~ ~~- ~ ~,~ Williaz'n J. ~~ol_ i ck Police I_^.ves =igator ~ telephone: 869-7521 (812) an equal opportunity employer _., ,~ ) ~_,~~ ' -~ °'°•°~ LOREN L. LAW & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANTS TO MANAGEMENT e ^ 7300 France Avenue South ^ Suite 420 ^ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 ^ Telephone (612) 835-3677 February 8, 1983 Honorable Mayor John Hamilton and Richfield Council Members City of Richf field 6701 Portland Avenue South Richf field, Minnesota 55423 Subject: Petition - Silver Ball Too LTD 7744 Morgan Avenue South Dear riayor and Council Members: A notice was received from Captain Richardson of the Richfield Police at my duplex at 7642-44 advising us of a hearing that will be held at City Hall on the above petition to locate an amusement center at 7744 Morgan Avenue South. I am opposed to locating a business such as this at this location or in the City of Richfield. This community has experienced this same type of business at both 77th and Portland and also east 66th Street • across from the swimming pool and both were upsetting to not only neighbors but families with teenagers. It requires close monitoring t~v the police department and with our tight budgets today our police have more important duties to perform than be a "baby sitter" for a center such as proposed. Businesses such as these attract many teen- agers from other suburban communities and can be very disturbing to the resod-en'Cia ommunity from 76th to 77th Street with traff is problems and `"hang-out" for the youth. The City of Richfield and volunteer groups spend considerable money for wholesome recreation programs along with our schools and this would detract from these efforts. `The Wes t_ Middle~chos~l ~ s ~n -.close_- - _. _ proxa.~~,t~ of this location and could .die a detriment for our Jr. High youth. The traffic nr~hle~. _in this area is now acute with our excellent auto agencies and other businesses in the area and this could have a very pro- found impact and detraction from these successful businesses in the area. This facility can serve the community in a more productive way by attracting businesses that will serve all the residents, not a small element. Your consideration in disapproving this application will be appreciated by not only the writer but many parents who have not been informed but would be very concerned about their teenagers. Sin ely, L~'izC/1 / i ~'l~i~_ ~~ Loren L. Law West Palm Beach, Florida ~ /~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 47 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Expiration Date and Changes in Make-Up of Advisory Commissions 1983 city council meeting, the city dates of advisory commission terms so that the city council could make all the appointments to the commissions at the same time. The following-commissions would be affected by any change in dates: n Presently, terms of Human Rights Commission members expire in the month of May. The ordinance establishing the commission does not specify a month of appointment. Therefore, it is recommended that the terms of the ten member commission be changed from May to January 31 as follows: -__-. It is recommended that the four terms (two youth, two adult) that would expire in May, 1983 be extended to January 31, 1984; Council Letter No. 47 -2- February 14, 1983 that the three terms which would expire in May, 1984 be ex- tended to January 31, 1985; and the three terms which would expire in May, 1985 be extended to January 31, 1986. Advisory Board of Health ~ ~ti (~ The statutes establishing local boards of health provide for a minimum of nine members, which has been the make-up of the Advisory Board of Health since its inception. The Advisory Board of Health is now requesting that the council increase the member- ship to twelve members, on the basis that they are having diffi- culty getting a quorum at their meetings. The statutes also stipulate that terms shall be for two years, and that no member may serve more than three consecutive terms. o`~ ~-~ J ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \' (' `~ ~ ~ C\ ~ a.~ ~, ~ Resolution No. 6565 creating this commission provides, among other things, that the office of a regular member may become va- cated "by failure to serve, shown by failure to attend three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the commission without written permission of the commission to be excused." Mark Rundquist, is a youth member with a term scheduled to expire in February, 1984. Of the 12 meetings in 1982, Mark attended a total of 3 meetings. Although~he has verbally indicated to the staff his intention to resign from the commission, he has not submitted a written resig- nat ion . Council Letter No. 37 -3- February 14, 1983 Originally, the Park and Recreation Commission consisted of 9 members. When the Advisory Youth Commission was abolished, the Park and Recreation Commission was expanded to include two youth members as it was determined that some of the focus of this commission was toward youth leisure activities. With the change to the Community Services Advisory Commission, the commission's responsibility has been expanded to include the whole of the city's community services operations, which includes not only park and recreation activities, but also public works activity. While the input from youth is still important, the focus of the commission now is much broader and frequently more adult oriented. Another consideration to be made in reassigning the position to an adult is the recruitment and selection of youth members has typically been very difficult and the attendance of youth members, quite frankly, has often been sporadic. Membership Expiration Under the present system of terms, there are 9 adult members, three of which have terms expiring in a given year. The two youth members have terms that expire the same year. That means that in 1983, the three terms expired were all adults; in 1984, five terms are scheduled to expire, three adults and two youth. In 1985, three adult terms will expire. To provide greater balance for the expiration of terms, it is recommended that the appointment to fill Mr. Rundquist's vacancy be for two years, with a January, 1985 expiration date. This would mean a three-year cycle of 3-4-4, compared to the present three-year cycle of 3-5-3. ~~ In summary, it is recommended that the city council take the ~~ following actions related to the Community Services Advisory lS_~ c. Commission ryS C`~ •;w 'a 1. Declare the position now held by Mr. Mark Rundquist .~ ~~, ~~ to be vacant; 2.~ That the vacancy be filled by an adult. A resolution providing for this amendment to the Community Services Commission is attached to this council letter; 3. That the person appointed to fill this ~Tacancy serve an unexpired term to expire in January, 1985. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 6565 WHICH ESTABLISHED A COMMUNITY SERVICES ADVISORY COMMISSION WHEREAS, By Resolution No. 6565, passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield January 25, 1982, the Richfield Community Services Advisory Commission was established and directed as to membership and purpose, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the interests of the city can best be served by an amendment to Resolution 6565 by changing one of the youth positions to an adult position. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, that with the amendment outlined above the following shall be in effect: 1. That there has been creation of a Community Services Commission . 2. That the commission shall serve in a direct advisory capacity to the city council, and that staff services for the commission shall be provided by the Community Services Department of the city. 3. That the commission shall consist of eleven (11) regular members, all of whom shall be residents of the City of Richfield. They shall be appointed by the city council and shall be subject to removal, with or without cause, by the city council. In making appointments to the commission, the city council shall undertake to secure representative balance among various groups and interests within the community. One (1) of the 11 regular members shall be youth. Ten (10) of the 11 regular members shall be adults, and the city council shall give due regard to repre- sentation from (a) senior citizens, (b) handicapped persons and parents of mentally and physically handicapped persons (c) the business community, (d) the public and private schools, (e) the community's athletic ®rganization, (f) the clergy, and (g) homemakers. 4. In addition to the 11 regular members of the commission, it shall have three (3) non-voting, ex-officio members. Such ex- officio members shall be selected as follows: One member shall be appointed by the Richfield City Council from among its members; one shall be appointed by the Richfield School Board from among its members or the school district staff, and one shall be appointed by the Richfield Planning Commission from among its members. 5. Regular members shall be appointed in January of each year by the city coucnil to serve three-year terms. Terms of the members of the commission shall begin on the first day Of February of the year of appointment and shall continue until the 31st day of January in which their appointment expires or until -2- their successors are selected, subject, however, to prior termina- tion as otherwise provided for in this resolution. Selection of ex-officio members shall be made annually and, insofar as possible, in January of each year, with such ex-officio members serving for a term of one year or until their successors are appointed. 6. The commission shall be advisory to the city council on matters relating to the community service facilities, programs and finances. This shall include, but not be limited to, community service related capital improvement projects, recreation programming, the community center, the nature center, the ice arena, the golf course, swimming pool, general government build- ings, L/H/N maintenance, park maintenance, street maintenance, sewer maintenance, water maintenance, city motor pool and any other item referred to it by the city council. 7. Any of the following shall cause the office of a regular member to become vacated: (a) death; (b) disability for failure to serve, shown by failure to attend three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the commission without written permission of the commission to be excused; (c) removal of legal residence from the city; (d) resignation in writing; (e) removal by the city council, and (f) election or appointment to a public office. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 14th day of February, 1983. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST; Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk ~7 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 46 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: The -- --- --r_~~~-.= •--•u ~ u~,~~aL,~ ~,~ limited to rive days per week, with the days to be deliniated on the license. They have also requested that the ordinance be amended to limit the m~v..,... ... L.-...-- -___ ~ r--••a ~{•= i~~ul~ w~Ulu pe at the aiscretion of the license holder, who would post them in a conspicuous place on a weekly basis. Respectfully submitted, i ~~ ' "'~~~~ Rarl Nollenberger City Manager RN/eja UilNNEAPOL 1S-RiCHF11=L~ A1',~'lERI~'AN LEGION PGST 4.35 C~ 6 5 0 1 PORTLAND AVENUE S O. ~° January 19.3 CITY OF P,IC~FIELO ~~7~~, PGrtla,~:.' .".Ve. So. ~,T ~ ~, t I ~~, . REFERE`fCE: dear Sir, 1)-r> .~ 3 f~ 1 ``^ f ~+~- Y L }~V ~~ /f 1:.a1~,~ .~r RICHFyI`ELD MINN. 55423 ~ Telepnorte 866-3647 :url x;011 enberaer City ''ar;ager r n~ DECO;"'E"lD~~TIQ`.S - TIP~"aRD OPERA IO„ Ourin~ your deliberations reg~~rdinq revisions to tLe Cic;~fie1J Garlblina ~rC:1 rlanCeS ','(c ',;OUI d aS~: y0U t0 CGnSI der GUr reCOf;rl:~n;'3tl Gn5 rertai rll iii ~o tipboaru operations. s ~. !;curs of operation eac~l uay are lir;ited to a c.axirlu~;: total of (c uet:aeen noon and 11:00 p.r.. ;lours are at --uiscretion of license ;;older and roust be hosted for the current seek in a conspicuous Wanner near the pull-tab operation. Thy rationale for these suC~estiohs is the need for the fiexi%ility to allo:r us to adjust the Puil-Tav Operation to suit tr`nds, seasonal and unpredictable in the restaurant operation. ~Urln~: file ,fear many lOCal, StatG1:J1~2 anu even n3tlGnal 1e`!~l ;--'~''eriCa;l LeC?iCn functions are held at our °ost due to its excellent an`i 1ar~e r~acilities. '.:e ~;~i sh tc i ncl uc'e i n our iIGSC?1 ..al i t~.r the on~ortu7i ty for these. guests to share in our ^ul I-l.a~J G?era tiorl. ^fferin~ our Sunday jingo patro - coati rued - r ~' I/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 45 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for Release of Off-Parking Per- formance Bond, 7344 Cedar Avenue In July, 1978, the city council approved an off-street parking permit far the property located at 7344 Cedar Avenue. Mr. Robert Wright, representing Bolt Electric, Inc., has re- quested that the city release the performance bond which was posted as part of that approval. The city staff has inspected the site and f The city has a lo ng history of problems arising from residential properties abutting commercial properties. Fencing and screening minimize these problems. It should be pointed out that property owner s do change and, therefore, land uses and attitudes may also change. In terms of requiring the south portion of the fence, t he intent is primarily for the screening of headlights from neig hboring properties. It is quite possible that the single family residential property on the southeast corner of 18th Avenue a nd 74th Street could be adversely affected if a fence was not requ ired. The owners of the commercial prop- erty to the south of th e subject property were recently required by the city to construc t a screening fence on their north prop- erty line (across 74th Street from Bolt Electric;. A four foot high fence on the south would meet the off-street parking con- tract requirements and resolve the vandalism concern expressed by Bolt Electric. It is recommended that the changes requested by Mr. Wright by denied, and that the bond not be released until such time as Council Letter No. 45 -2- February 14, 1983 the fences are constructed as approved. However, if the council wishes to release the bond, the attached resolution should be approved. Respectfully submitted, ~~ f~ s,-~Ji,~cz~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: City Engineer KN/eja • • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO RELEASE OF BOND ON OFF-STREET PARKING Bolt Electric, Inc. 7344 Cedar Avenue Use: Electrical Contracting Service WHEREAS Bolt Electric, Inc., 7344 Cedar Avenue, Richfield, Minnesota, which contract bears the designation of Contract No.2271, and which contract was guaranteed by an off street parking operator's bond in the amount of Four Thousand, Seven Hundred Dollars ($4,700.00) on which the Western Surety Company appears as surety, and WHEREAS, said Bolt Electric, Inc. has substantially complied with the provisions of said agreement and now seeks to be relieved of any further obligation under said bond, and WHEREAS, there appears to be no justification for requiring said Bolt Electric, Inc. to continue to provide a bond for security on the performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: That the city manager is hereby authorized and directed to release Bolt Electric, Inc. for any and all acts committed or incurred in violation of said Contract No. 2271, on and after the 14th day of February, 1983. Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this 14th day of February, 1983. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk _ _ ___ ___ T. _ _ _ _. _ B a ELECTRIC, INC. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS October 2~, 1~~81 •` 1 f~. ;; ~, Torn McGibbon Planning Division Richfield City Hall Dear Sir: 7344 Cedar Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55423 Phone: (612) 869-3231 We are writing you regarding our property at 7344 Cedar Avenue South. At the present time we have a Bond with the City for a Off- Street Parking Permit Agreement. Everything has been inspected and approved by the Inspector with the excemption of two sections of fence. These sections are located on the North and South sides of our property, as per the diagram attached. We would like to eliminate these two sections of fence for the following reasons: 1. The South section faces a commercial building and parking lot making this unnecessary to protect from headlights. There. is no residential building involved on that side. This building, which is now vacant and has been for sometime, was evidently not required to put up a privacy fence to protect us, as there is not one there. This fence would also enclose the Southwest part of our premises to the point of attracting vandalism. As it is right now, only a few weeks ago we had a stolen car taken. from the Airport and brought to our lot and then stripped down and the remains left here. 2. The Northside of our property goes right next to the neighbors driveway. In speaking with them, they do not wish a fence there either. They also keep an eye out for us on that back and side parts of our property. The original drawing does not show that we installed a fence from the back side of the garage to the West fence. This elim- inates the light problem for the parking on the North side. We hope that you will approve these changes and change your drawing accordingly. Our application number is 78-8, Contract number 2271, dated 7/25/78 and our Bond Number is 5693820. May we hear from you soon as we are very anxious to have this approved so as to be able to cancel our Bond. Respectively, BOLT ETT:CTRIC , INC . Robert K. Wright RKW/ma LICENSED BONDED INSURED s' ~ ~ °"ti . ,: ;, . x.131:':'. `s ~.~c -~A ~.... ~.. .., -. _ •, ~ . :-" <.+ .z:. . .~~' ; l..bl~"f'1 C 1^ c.~.,~-~ x I~~ ~' ~' _ ~ CEDAR AVE. OFF STREET PARKING NO. 78-8 D--N-~ Scale 1~~= 30~ OWNER AND ADDRESS: Bolt Electric Inc. 7344 Cedar Avenue South LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Outlot 1, Lying South of North 530 feet thereof, Evergreen Gardens Second Addition, and south 65 feet of north 530 feet of Outlot 1, Evergreen Gardens Second Ada. USE: Electrical Contracting Service DATE OF APPLICATION: June 18, 1978 COUNCIL ACTION: July 24, 1978 NO. PARKING SPACES: 9 • E.K. S OFF-ST. PARKING 7/6/78 February 10, 1983 City of Richf ie ld To Whom It May Concern: It is my understanding that you have requested Bolt Electric to build a fence on the north side of their property. This property extends right up to the area of my vegetable garden and my rase bushes. This fence would not only hinder those things but also we would not be happy with the closed up feeling. Bolt Electric tells me that one of the reasons for construction of this fence is to protect us from the glow of car head lights. We have never been bothered by this and also they already have a fence which would serve this purpose. We also keep an eye open for any kind of vandelism, etc. that. goes on there when their business hours are over. This fence would eliminate our view completely. We have at many occassions had to get children off this property not only for Bolts protection but also for the childrens. We certainly would be very disappointed if this fence is built. Sincerely, Mrs. Swanson ~ /~ ,:~~ Lf ~~~~~,~ 7334 Cedat Avenue South Px # 869-3130 • °r ,.,, •~'rk i ~ii~L .s .. _ .. ~ •' fe~a ~ 63, i l~.hrrti e,v^ Cu,rb ~~ ~'_ ~ --~ CEDAR AVE. scale= t"= 30' OFF STREET FARRING NO. 78-$ OWNER A1VD ADDRESS: Bolt Electric Inc. 7~ 44 Cedar Avenue. South LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Outlot 1, Lying South of North 530 feet thereof, Evergreen Gardens Second P.ddition, and south. 65 feat of north 530 feet of Outlot 1, Evergreen Gardens Second. Addo- IISE: Electrical Contracting Service DATE OF APPLICATION: June 18, 1978 COIINCIL ACTION: July 24, 1978 • NO. PARKING SPACE'S: 9 r FENCES TO SE ELIMINATED 7 ~/, " _ ~ -, 'u '~ _ , y ~~,! 4° i= ~^ ` ~~ - =6 - j o ~ n~ Z' a ~~ a~, 1 ~` : 9- ` • q a' ' _. ~ ~ i _ . Land Use ~a~ -- ~ ~ ~ Q ~5~' N ~ _ ~ - - - I ~~ • W ~ ! _ ~ Q 2~Sh ~~~~ ~ ~'~ 6 ~ ~ it ~_ ~ ). c .a ~`1 ~ ~ ' 1 mil/ ~~ -~ -~ 't .~~3)~' ``¢) ,- °',~'~!io ~ ,.. ~ci~) `~;~11 ~c Bbl '~ a '` . •z 0 ,o a ~~ -- ' EAST --` ~° ?" 73~d _ ..STREET e_ _ of ., . . ~ ILA Mi ~° . ~\I , - .. ~~ " Z O I / O '~ lyt` O _1 1 0 9 _ - . ~... ~ : .~ _ '3 4i ~ ; LQ•1 .. 2 - ~= •~ - --' ~ q ,~1 ~ /Q,1 1 G, ail • ~ ~ -b ~ ~ ~/ r ~ N ~ ~ lq; . F _ in' 5 ~1 ^_.'~~~ ~y ~b~ 'o :~, ~ _ .. ~~'~!:. _ ~3~ ~~~1i ~1 J / _ _ ~ W _ _ - _ _ D~~ ~_ ;' ~01 { ~ ~/ \ ~ ~•` _ ~ Iol~ ~ • ,~21 5 ~ ' ' a ~I~~ ~ ~b ~. 1 •lel _ /.1 ~ ~ ;~~ b illy . _ \ ~\~ ' ~ ~ 0 o°0°O 'v°°°O°0 00. o°o o°a°~ oOOVO°o °°d~i° o °°° _ 0' ,V,gfj ~i 0 00° ° ° 0O° o °°ao~ ~~ °~°°'6° o ,~a~ 2 ~Q. °° yy?o °° 0°0°0°0°,0°° ° ° o °~°°°~°°°~oo° °°pa°o° c°0ooooo°e ° i d. b~~O ° oooo°O~~"°°d °~~o°o d o ° ° °°~o oo°"o'b o°J ~oo°° ° ° o • 1' ,~ do° • °,oAO 0°o°aoo°o; ; w t 0° - °o o°o°°~o J OOOOOJO ° °00 '° ° O ° ° ° U ~ L CO ;' ~! L i ' ° 0 0 P O o OO O ~°o° °d'°~°O°~°°o iej\ ~ y,, w~ s '~> . - J ' 1~ : 7 ~v Slt @ .' _ ~~ - i ~. ~ .1_ ^1 ~'a. ~~_ .:l ~1 - _ _)~ 111 ti= _ °; =--I '~°°~°~oo ;° Sing 1 e - . ~ ~°' ~°~° apartments Famsly ~ o i J 0 _~.. 45 . e. Commercial Duplexes y JQ oil, 5 ~ t.:s z ~ '-~ .s.- 1 ~. ~~y; ~ ~ ;~,:'~~ 2 :; c~ 3' ;~~ ~ ,off 3 '~~~ ; ,~`3 3 is ~ it ,- ~ ~ ,: •jey, I r 'w : 10` ', ~ ~`0'1-~ ;O 4',`l~1 ~ ;GARD N ~ s ~..i~ ~,~ o~,~~r o~l-r~ Z~~ °,.~.s: ~f ~- - r' I~ ~ w ~ ,~t - •G .`i. `rl~.a ~ ~ a _ of ~:~~~:`' ~ ;89cj ,,, T~, - D 3~' °~3°~ Oe , ;%I ~ 3 ° , 4~N ~~ o ~>,1 ~. , ~ r ~.: ~'.~. r ~ ( l * 7 ~~~ i ~ ~-y) i ~ -rG -'° d y: c . ~s~ ~~ . ^ f - ;; oB ti ~g a ~~; .~i ~ +~ ~ 7l 3tc3 c~ ~ SOUTH_ a -~ ~ > 9 t5: ;q L w ~ .~ r TNiRO~ ~, .d (I `. •o .. - r a j ,y 'l, r t ~ ,` Cr v 1 , Q - - -0"°-0-°; - ° o° 00°0 °O'GC'°OOO~ooo°o n°o ° °D °o° o 0 L _ ~ gao0o o o ° o~ o o°o a° ° rPo o°oo°°~° oQO°oo p o°o ° ° °° °Oo . _ ° ~~ 0 ~o~ e - ~ ~ °°~~~ ~>;~ ° J J o= ° °~o° ~ o ° ° ° r ° ° J _ s. ~oooa °o~~~~~~~ ~ o o°~,,,oo°~co.,o°°°o°0°ao° _ - ~ o°0°C0° °'O°9'c''oopo °~o°~o o~~,7Y'JOJ'~°°° ba0~o oQ ~o° ~oe oooc~ OO O °0000 0 000° c >;0°0 °0 000,000 - ,~o~ a°°° a° o°o°~OOO~0~°° o~d' d~ o° ~ o'dg°~'~°cYa+°°8op3° pooo~~°~~S~a o . ~ a°0°'° °oS o~0 ~OO°o°o L o0~oaooo~o0~0 00000 0 o°~°~ 0° 0°0 0 . 1 - ~ pay `~ ~.~ __ -_-_ __ ~ (.. .. 1 ~ ' ~ a ~I a3 ~ .. ` ~11. n .1 ~ .I t ~ •. 'j ` /^'~ ~ n~V ~ a ~.N I~.fi -y~1. pv a ~ ~ _ _-. X51 !--s! ,° \ . ~ z ~~_ o ~ " jJ o'0a 0 ° ° o'.o°o° ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No.44 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. Report Mr. Steve Lipenski, Executive Director of the Storefront/ Youth Action, Inc., has requested an opportunity to appear before the city council to bring the council up-to-date on activities and plans for the The Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. Therefore, Mr. Lipenski will be present at the February 14, 1983 city council meeting to make such a presentation. Respectfully submitted, ~~ -~I..y.z,~-~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/ej a February 9, 1983 STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION Administrative Offices 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, MN 55424 (612) 926-1851 TO: Mayor Hamilton and Richfield City CoLmcil ''') FROM: Steve Lepinski, Executive Director d~l ' ~~ t ''~ Storefront/Youth Action ~"~ RE: Presentation to Cotmcil on 2-14-83 Attached are some materials that may be helpful background to my presentation on Monday, February 14, 1983. I have included the following items: 1. 1983 Budget 2. 1982 Youth Counseling Program Statistical Report 3. 1983 Board of Directors 4. 1983 Organizational Chart • I look forward to talking with you and answering any questions that you may have. Adolescent Victim Counseling Program, 7145 Harriet ,Avenue South, Richfield, MN (612) 861-1678 Edina Project CHarlie, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, MN 55424 (612) 925-9706 Richfield Project CHarlie, 7145 Harriei Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423 (612) 861-1675 Storefront, 7145 Harriet Avenue South, Richfield, MN 55423 (612) 861-1675 Youth Action, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, MN 55424 (612) 926-1851 y ~ ~n ~o ~O ~ ~O ~ ~O ~ ~O ~o ~ ~o ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~o ~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~o ~O ~ ~ ~ ~o ~O ;:~ O l0 G l0 ~ OJ 0~ OJ OJ W J J J J Q~ G~ 6~ 61 6~ Cn U7 ,A .A .A .A .A .A W N N N N r' N r' O h ~] V( CY 6J O ~P W N r' O W N~ O~ W N r' O F-~ O U~ .P W N F-~ O O N r' r' O N r' 0 0 n ~ O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O In 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t-+ t O H o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rl ~ ~ ro ~ ro ~ :~ ~ ~ o ro ~ ro H ~-3 ti C] ~i ro ro ~n H ~ C7 ~ d t' "' ~ .s n7 ~n m G ~ rt co ct o c r--~ a ~ r• m r- m a a~ E a rn ~ R~ G m K~ a o o K s/ m m o r- r- r• ~ a rr m ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ a ~ n O' C tY ~ iv ~ ~ O ~ r- '~ ~-' ~ ~ N ~ rn a K C~ n ~ K N rD n rD N rt K N t3' K r• t/ O r d r- a G R+ rr ~ 'LS m rt to m a co N Y n7 ~ a ~3 co K cD a s1. r- O K m R• rt r• r- ~ N ~ \ a rr ~ b G a CY ct to K r- ' r• rt O K m f/ K ~ ~ rt K to O t7 O h r• \ r' UJ ~4 r~ r• ~ N ~ r~ H ~ r• ~ N n ~3 ~4 IJ ~ \ K ~4 r• ~ a x ~ ~ rt rD rD ~ tD O rt (o N ~ - lD N a rta ~'Fi \~'G7r-G rt a rtOS2 n"C C ~4 ~ ~ r•m I-+in ~ m rt ~ \ r- t7 to x r• r- a r- "C rr r- ~ n m N rt ~ '~] '-C In C7 ' ' r• ~ rt H K ~ (D O h7 (D Cd 'D X cD r• R3 r-h I-' ~ O O X O C to 't3 K I-t rt K~ ~~ a N H ~ ~ 't3 G a C r• d m ~n \ r• m to ~ ~ 'TS t o • m ~ ~ G ~ ~ a (o • u m K a ~ m m ~ C ~- ~ ~ ,p rt ~ ~ ~ .A F~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ N .A N N F-' N N W l0 ~ r l0 ~,,~ 61 O O to lfl W F-' J N r' N N F-' N W W N l0 6~ O l0 W N J W N .A J W '~ l0 ~ Vi CO 0 0 0 0 O O O 6~ O In O N O N J .A W ~O 0~ 6~ l0 6~ ~O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lfl O O O O O In O O N O O W W O O .-. F-' O O (D ~ ~ ~ N C (D W W W W N O~ r' O O W N r' N F-' F-' N N V~ .P l9 6~ J 61 61 F~ O i-~ N O ~ w OJ to O~ O O O ~P 6~ In O w O W N w 6~ l0 .A cn W N O 07 Cn W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O W .A N W O .A 0 0 ,-. r' Ul ~~ ~n {n ~ ~ ~C (7 N W N N N W 'L7 r' N W W N W F-' N W N r' W r' OJ N O .-~ N (~ J 07 CO F-' O W N N 'A W U'7 W r' r' O .A 6~ 6~ F-' .A J Ut .A W W 6l l0 J N O G to O~ J to O O lO O O Cn O O~ .A N O N O N N N O O~ W 6~ .A ~O O OJ O fZ (11 W O W 0 0 0 0 6~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .P O O O F-~ O O O O O N O w J to .A w .A O cn ~ y 0 rt ~ 7 <zJ O '] ~ ro ~' o ~ F~ OA F-' I-' t-' F-' N r' N w U~ (7 X H iA I-~ W N F-' N N O ~ 61 r' 1b U7 !-~ 6l W J W ~ O~ O 6~ N W W J FJ W ~ \ J .P W In O O to O »'~ O ~O N In O W O N N N 6~ N F-' N N In J F-' O O ~ ~C O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6~ O O O O O O O O O O W lJi .A O 0~ ~ 6~ .A O O ~ O O ~3 m x ~ ~ ~ w ~ ro 1 0 H ~ W ~ W W f-' ~A (~ H I-~ O .A .A t~ r' F--' .A lIl r' N O F-' N .A N In F-' W J .A l0 OJ OJ In l0 O O O O~ In O O l0 0~ V~ 07 O In .A O W Ol 6~ J W O O CO O O O O O O O O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ O O .A N O O W ~ I!~ ~ C o to to loooornooooo0000000~ooooomoo~~~~~o~ Io • ~ ~ ~ ~ .A .? W !!a W N W F--' N N O ro O .A In N In F--' N to OJ ~ to N J !-~ N O .~ 6~ J l0 J O 6~ J OJ W ~? N In J N .A N .A In 6~ J I-' O !-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. O r' O N O O O lIi 0 0 .A J W N J O O O ~ ,~ to F-' C7 H N N N r' N N ,A h7 .A 6~ W N F-' J W N F-' .? OJ W N U7 N N ^ !b Ut N N N O U~ 6~ F-' .P J O W r' 6~ 6~ O O O O N .A N .A J W W O ,p 61 07 N O O O OD ~ lJi O J F~ O O U~ W O CO Ui W N N N N W W O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lIt O O O O O O O O N 6~ W N 0~ O J • ~' ~' rn O ~ .A N ~ W I-J r' .A W FJ N Ut ' N N N ~-3 J N ~A W W .P F-~ F--' r' OJ r' F-' 6~ .A W N W 6~ 6~ N Ol O O .A r ~ al l0 J O In O W O~ N N .P CIi `A l0 W N ~ Ol N Ol W F-' .A N W .A 0~ In J O O lf~ V--' 6~ ~ lp 61 W F-' O O O .A 0 0 0 0 In O O to N OJ In O w N to ~] .P W ~O O~ W w w 0~ N t~ W p~ p 6l ~D O O O OJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6~ .P 0 0 0 In O N O O O O Cn O N 6~ ~~ l17 O J ~1 U • H O a r .P J rn rn i i i 1 1 w w W 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I ~? N J .A ~O J N .A N 6~ H' OJ o r -' ~O .p J N N .A O O W ~ N J J ~ O ~O W .A .A .P -cam J .P ~ ~ o ~ N J N W N ~ ~ J N W ~ N O °" o ~ 0 ~ O O r -h a ~ ~ ~ • a ro ~ ~r n a ~ rt r• O ~ X o O ~ '~ ~ ~ a r~ o ~ x ~ rfi 'tJ tD A ~ .A ~ G J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C rn ~ n a ~ rt~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ r- w ~ rn ~ d w co w C rn N 1~ O CO 'L3 ~ d ~ y N (D ~, O N C ~ r+ o~ m a ~ N to O R~ lri 'c3 b J y X ~ ° ° ~ ~ - ~ n a ~ ~ a r~ .A (D ~ N Ul 1/} to N ~C O W (-] ~ r-~ ro J lT~ W F-+ ~O t~ to ~n ro ow c~ J O ~/? lIl ~A ;17 d,~ W h7 n .A. O F-~ O~ ~ O O C a~ C7 o~ b W O to .A y o~ W UJ O o 'v rn N N lJ1 N d oW .A ~ ro U7 .A C t" O n H F-i O O '~ d H z H H H H CT7 ro tr1 7. H O ro ro 0 N N N a dn~-+oacn~cxr~z~r~r~~n~n ~n O O O~ O n ctG G O ~r•L~.Nr-r•r•r• O a ~~ ~+ G W~ C t (D r• ~ r• n r• O n rt rr rt t G G ~' G O G' 'C ~C `C G n y t"i A~ rt (D rt r-S n G r • r to G (D ~ r lD W F-fi W ~ M n rD r~ tD (o r~ r• p, r• r- r• O O O ~ G rr r• W o (D E 0 0~ O st r' cn rt ~ \ G a ~' cz ~+ ~ t~ to to r• ~U (~ rt G ~ O O R~ N Fi O O ~'• G l7 O CI) G C~ r• O C) C ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ n o ~ o ~ Ul (D UI H rt • G G ~ ~' LTJ C~ ~ N ~ rh ~ O r• r• \ C~J r cD N~ rr n 0 0 r• O G N ~ ,p rt ~ m ~ rJ cn N ~} ~ lD K r• tT] G • ~ C m P~ rt rr to in d w w O w w C (D ~ ~ N N t-~ O F-' O w O ~ 'U N -(/? J W F-' F-~ ~] W N W W lfl W l0 N O W F-' 6l Ul l0 Ol N O ~, N O OJ In O O In O In O O .A N W b N O O O O O F--• O 0 0 0 0 0 0 F-' O ~O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 `. J r' ~ O W N W l0 r' W Cfl l0 l0 C'7 ro J In CIt ll7 O J ll7 ("~ ~ o r~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .n w m ~ ~ w tv rn ~ ~ n N 07 .A O J O J O ~ ~ ~ w ~ O r' W N ~A C ( ~ W O r' O r' 'Tl N O .A O OJ .A O O O .A ~ ~ ~ ~ W o~ in o~ v~ O 0 0 0 o ni a~ o m o ~ ~ N N W W OJ W CIt ~ a J O J b CO O N W O 07 ~ ~ a w N W O .A f-' N r' N r' ~A OJ O J W F--' N W W a J .P Vt F--' .A C77 -O F--' .A l0 O W ~ ~ l0 6l N O ~ r 6~ N N 0 0 0 0 cn N W J ~l O O O ~A N w l0 ' ~ W 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6~ O N 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tr1 zn G a a o m rr h] 0 0 ~, z a 7J \ (D ~C C O (D C; ~ a G x m i n a u H ~o O ~ z w r N N STOREFRONT/YOUTf~ ACTION AP~~NUAL STATISTICAL, REPORT 1 niQlr G'S 1982 i ~~ ~.cc. Rlnnrninntc~n Eden Prairie Edna ~.,.~_. 2 06 18 -- 18 2 - AGE: - ----- -- - __ _____ j3 8 under _ __ 26 12.6 6 33 - 3 38 20 . 40 = I~-IS -- - 83 --4~.3 - 6 - 33 3 -_50 27 -42 -= Ib-l7 - - - 86 41- 7 - 4 - -22 - 2 72 39 . _ 25 _ 18 & ov e r r ------------ ~ E Y.: _ t~hale l 1 -- -- 120 _ 5 . 3 --- 58.3 _2 ~ - -- -- ~ 5--- 11. _ --- _ 27. 2 2 _ - - _ 64 _12 . --- _ 3-5 _- _ 11_ - - - - 57_ _ - - _4 Female 86 41.7 _ 13-- -_ 72.2 ll6__ 6.3_.7 __ 61 5 Unknown SOURCE OF R E F_E R R A L :_ _ CourtTCt Ser. _ 16 ---- 7.8 3 - - - 16_.7 2 ------ - 6-_ 1.1 - --- - _3.3 - -- - -_-_ 7 _-' - `_ Police J--- S ,---ol ----- ) 64 S~ __ -31__.1- _ ___ ____12 - 9 _66.7 0 41 __ 72-- 22_5 - 39-'-6 __27__ --ate - -~ ~t;;~Family Pc, 36 17.5 _ -` 0 0 25 _13.7 _ 18 1 P c r t i c i p a n t --- ~ ~ ~ 3-- -~ - 14 O~c r 2-5 12 ~ _ - ~ ~ --- - 2 l , ~ ~ - 2 5 - -1-~- --- ~ -- _ PREVIOUS CJS f NVOLVEME NT _ -- _ ~_ -- _-_ --- -- _ . - - ____ _ _- _ _ _~__ __ N° Z2 Z -1--~--- -72~ a~- -~$1 - $1_ _E --- Yes - 84 - 40.8 - 5 27.8 39 21. 37 PREVIOUS CLIt~I~JT - --- - - - - - No I1 {6_- Yes_ -- 30 PRlt~f/~,RY P,EASOP~ FOR REFERR.4t: Property OFF. 69 - -- ~ _$5 ~- 14.6 1 _ _ 3 f ~ - _ 2-.-- - 1 ~ ---- -- - - f . l - 11.71 _ - _ - 2-3 _ --- ~4-- - 2._ _. _----- - 36_ _ - ----_-- --~-- _ __ -- Chem. Offcnse ._ _ 7 - 3 . 4 1 5 _ 23 12_ __ 7 _ _ _ Ct~~er Offense 13 6 . 3 2 11 . _ 6 3 . - __ 7 _ Prob. Personal 5 3 __ LZLO _` ~ ~ -~--2-- - ~~ _ _ Fc;nil~ Problcrn . _ 18 _~ 8. 7 ~ - 0 - 0 60 _ 33_ _ ___ 16 _ _ C~. Pr~crn _ _ 58 __ _28.2 ___ __-- 1 _ _ _5. 39- _21_'~ - 12_ 1982 Richfield TOTAL - 118 f - - 552 - _ No. °-o --- - _ r~o. -- °~ ~ 1981 TOTAL 639 1 No./~ 3.9 .113 20.5 140/21.9 5.6 190 34.4 213133.3 1.2 197 35.7 254/39.7 9.3 ---52 - 9.4 32/ 5.C 8.3 _ _261 _47.3 328151.3 1.7 289 52.4 311/48.7 - - - 2 .4 __. 5 9 _-- -- 37 - 6.7 - 21/ 3.3 2. 9 -152 27 5 185/29 .0 _ 3.9 _ 169 30.6 _212/33.2 5.3 _ __ 80 _ 14.5 115/18.0 ~,S- .._6 2 __ ~ 1_s 2 X41 9. 4 5.9 52 9.4 46 7.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~_ 6-$--5 4 Q17 2 . 0 1.4 174 31.5 179/28.0 ~_, 5- ~ 457 __82._8 536183. 9 0 . 5_j__ 95 17.2 103 16 . 1 23_--7 -L~-- ---2 ~-~-~ -~ 2 3 . 8 5,9 a2 7.6 54/ 8.5 _5 . 9 _2 8 S. 1 _3 ~ 5. 8 2 7. ] 9 5 17 . 2 ~Z-512 7. 4 - •- 13.6 _-- _ 99 ~ 17.9 _ _812.7 10.2 116 21.0 ---_ --- Pd/~3.1 - - --- - _ - - - ^ ~ 8 3 ther 6 2.9 0 0 7 3.8 16 13.6 31 5.6 Sj - r STOREFRONT,.%`YOUTH ~"ACTION 1982 I ERMI NAT I O NS IJo. I % i TOTAL REASON FOR TERMIP~ATION: Completed Program ;~ith~out Referral Completed Frorgrum through Referral Participated-Refused Referral Participated-Did not Return Participated-Term by Staff Other ~ ___ _ ADD1T10NAL FROSLEM IDENTIFIED: SERVICES PROVIDED: Personal Family Chemical Use 6y CI Tent Chemical Use in Family Fh;/sical~Sexucl Abuse ~dUCatlonal /~SCIlOOI Psye hol og i calj Ot her SianiFicant Loss C.J.S. I(~lVOLVEtJ~ENT ~ti~HILE IN PROJECT: l'es No Chcrnical Dependency ln`ormotion 76 14 - 6 Chemical Dc E,en,tci~cy Counsel irig~Ti cotn~~ent 6 9 1.3 _ 3 Educctional 116 22.4 Job I I°Ir~ 1 0. 2 Legal 0 0 _ 0 Advocacy-S~I,~c! 2 0.4 Advocccy-Police 1 0 . 2 Advocacy-Courts 0 0.0 Advocacy-General 1 0. 2 Retreat 0 0.0 Grove Counseling - 122 23.5 Fcmily Counseling 223 43.0 Individual Long-Term Counse) ing 53 10. 2 individual Short-Term Counsel ing 286 55 . 1 Additioncl probl~rns idcn'ified end the services pro~i,;c•d may equal r.cre than the total number of clients. 276 53.2 52 10.0 26 5.0 85 16.4 55 10.6 25 4.8 49 9.4 108 20.8 29 5.6 40 7.7 24 4.6 29 5.6 17 3.3 19 3.7 26I 5.0 493 95.0 519 315 519 950 - _ __ ___ `,r,~, (~Ot~,T/YOUTH l~CfIUN 1°82 FOLLOW-UPS • No. % TOTAL _ _ _ - ---- - - -- _ Pn1P./~AR1' REASGNS_FOK fZEFERRAL --- -----~- -- . 553-- Property Offense 13 7 24.8 Other Offense 6 1 11.0 Personal 133 24.1 Fornil)' 66 11.9 Chemicol Use b~~ Cl ierit 86 15. 6 Otl~cr 6 11 _ 0 I Unknown ---- -- - 9 1.6 --- ADD1T10NAL Pf`OGLE,`~1S IDENTIFIED: - ~ 327 Personal 47 8.5 FcmilY 116 21.0 Cl~,ernicol Use oy Client 32 5.8 Chemical Use in Fomil)' 38 6.9 Phys i col sexual Abuse 2 2 d, p Fducntional~Schc°1 I 28 5.1 Ps;~c hol og i cal 3 0.5 Sionificant Loss ~ 6 2.9 O~hcr 25 4.5 ~ C.J.S, 1NVOl_VE1~'tCNT SINCE LEAVING PROJECT ~ 553 Ycs 31 5.6 Nc' 522 94.4 Unknown ------------------- - - ---- -------- 0 0.0 O'ti'cRALL ASSESSI~Arf~~r OF SITUAhION SINCF COMING INTO P(:OJF CT 553 Much \?'~~ r-s e Some;;1iot 11dc~rse 8 1. 4 No Change 30 5.4 81 14.6 Somewhat BettE~r 229 41.4 N;uch Better 120 21.7 Ur:known --- --- ------------ ---- 8 5 15 . 4 • STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION Board of Directors January, 1983 Prudence Abeln -Treasurer Tom Morgan Richfield Public Safety 6337 W ilryan 6700 Portland Ave. Frlina, MN 55435 Richfield, ICI 55423 Res• 944-3705 Res: 866-1837 Ofc: 866-5061 Jennifer Bell 10816 Girard Circle Bloomington, MN 55431 Ed Orenstein - President Res: 888-7724 Opus Center, Suite 1000 9900 Bren Rd. Minnetonka, MAN 55343 Laura Berg Ofc: 938-3700 5608 Dale Ave, Edina, MN 55436 Res: 920-4226 Lorinda Pearson City of Bloomington 2215 West Old Shakopee Rd. George Butzow Bloomington, MCI 55431 MTS Systems 14000 Technology Dr. Ofc: 881-5811 ext. 315 Fclen Prairie, MN 55344 Ofc: 937-4000 Phil Riveness 9215 Syndicate Ave. Ginger Gleason Bloomington, MN 55420 6211 Logan Ave. So. Res: 881-9556 Richfield, MN 55423 Ofc: 296-7158 Res: 866-3815 Robert Sherman . Michael Hayden -Vice. President 5200 Tifton Dr. 6704 Parkwood LN Edina, MN 554;35 _ Edina, MN 55436 R es: 941-4328 Res: 933-3211 Ofc: 835-7774 Ofc: 835-2580 Patty Quick Stern Edward V. Johnson 6938 12th Ave. So. 8240 Garfield Ave. So. Richfield, MN 55423 Bloomington, NLN 55420 Res: 866-1324 Res: 884-6526 Ofc: 333-2353 LIAISONS: --:d~ancy Jorgensen <-fig20 11th Ave, So. Donald Hassenstab Richfield, NliN 55423 7120 Irving Ave. So. Res: 869-1878 Richfield, MN 55423 Res: 866-5460 Pam Keating -- Secretary (Richfield City Council) 6901 Dawson LN Edina, MId 55424 David Sumnicht Res: 920-3472 6620 Logan Ave. So. Richfield, MN 55423 Rich P•,ahony Res: 869-7622 6216 Schaefer Circle (Richfield School Board) Edina, MN 55436 Res: 933-1831 Ofc: 298-4323 ~+ 0 n m rn n 0 a '°~ ro ~ Ft -~ n n o n o ~ c° `~ ~~ ~~ -12- ro n 0 0 P~ O K N- N A~ rt r• 0 n a n rr rr ~~ 0 IK rt, K O rt K O G rt n rt N• 0 ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 43 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Co unity Theatre Presentation On February 6, and 2T, 1983, the Richfield Community Theatre will be utt'ng on "Aj~Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" at the Academy of Holy Angels. In preparation for this event, John Landers and other members of the cast will be present at the February 14, 1983 city council meeting to do a short presentation for the City Council to generate interest for this event. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/ej a ,~P ,'`. e~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ ~~fA .~ ~~ ~~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No, 42 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Outdoor Advertisinq Display Regulation Ordinance Amendment. Second Reading. U On January 10, 1983, the city council conducted a public hearing concerning an ordinance amending the sign ordinance provisions pertaining to outdoor advertising displays. The council deferred second reading of the ordinance until February 14, 1983, and directed the staff to further refine the ordinance. The following is a summary of the major changes which have been made since the ordinance was given first reading on November 22, 1982. 1. All references to "billboards" have been changed to "outdoor advertising displays"; 2. Notice of the public hearing required before the issuance of sign permits for outdoor advertising displays will be sent to property owners instead of occupants; 3. Sign permits issued for outdoor advertising dis- plays will no longer be subject to renewal after five years;' 4. The maximum sign area for each sign face of an outdoor advertising display has been reduced from 825 square feet to 750 square feet; 6. The maximum height of an outdoor advertising dis- play which the city council could approve if certain conditions are present has been increased from 40 feet to 48 feet; Council Letter No. 42 -2- February 14, 1983 7. Non-conforming outdoor advertising displays will be "grandfathered in". They will no longer have to be removed within five years of the effective date of the ordinance. It is recommended that the city council amend the ordinance to bring it into the present form prior to giving the ordinance second reading. Respectfully submitted, ', Karl Nollenberger ' City Manager cc: Chief Building Inspector City Planner KN/ej a • ~ ~~ ~ • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 41 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Release of Performance Bond for Summit Bank, 6500 Nicollet Avenue In September, 1979, the Summit Bank provided the city with a certificate of deposit in the amount of $10,000 in lieu of the performance bond required by the city's planned unit de- velopment ordinance to insure completion of the site and parking lot improvements on the bank's property. Summit Bank has now requested that the city release this certificate of deposit. The city staff has inspected the project and found that all of the required improvements have been made with the ex- ception of some ground cover plants. It is recommended that the city council authorize the release of this certificate of deposit. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager KN/eja r: ~ ~~ ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 40 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richf field Council Members: Subject: Ordinance Amendment to Allow Entry Additions Within Frontyard Setback Areas. First Reading In the past, the city council has expressed a desire to amend the city's single family residential setback requirements to allow small entry additions to project into frontyards. It is felt that these types of additions help conserve energy, are small and would not adversely affect the neighborhood. An ordinance amendment, which would allow entry additions to project a maximum of six feet into a required frontyard is attached to this council letter. The additions could be no more than eight feet in width and no more than one story in height. The planning commission recommends city council approval of the attached ordinance. It is recommended that the city council give first reading approval to the attached ordinance and schedule the public hear- ing and second reading of this ordinance for February 28, 1983. Respectfully submitted, Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: City Planner Building Inspector KN/eja Sill No . Ordinance Ne. ?.~`~-ENDI,?ENT TO SECTIONS 3.30 SL"BDIVISION 5 • A1~1D 3.30A SUBDIVISION 5 TO AJJVYV ENTRY ADDITIONS '~dITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA CITY OF RICHFIEi,D DOES ORDAIN: Sections 3.30 and 3.30A of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, vinnesota outlining the regulations of the R and R-1 Residence zoning districts are hereby amended in the following respects; (1) Section 3.30 Subdivision 5 is amended by adding the following new paragraph (i): (i) Entry vestibules may project a maximum of six feet into a reQUired front yard. Such addi- tions shall be no more thar_ 8 feet in width nor more than 1 story in height. (2) Section 3.30A Subdivision 5 is amended by adding the following new paragraph (e): (e) Entry vestibules may project a maximum of six feet into a recruired front yard. Such addi- tions shal 1 be no more than 8 feet in width nor more than 1 story in heicht. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of 1983. John Hamilton , ~~iavor ATTEST. SvlvZa :~. 3erch, City Cleric ~`1 ~ CITY OF RICHFLELD, MINNESOTA • Off ice of City Manager Council Letter No. 39 Agenda February 14, 1983 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Request for a Variance at 6612 Knox Avenue To Reduce Sideyard Setback Requirement to Allow Construction of Addition - Request for Deferral to February 28 Mr. Timothy D. Lindgren has submitted a request to reduce the sideyard setback requirement for a single family interior lot from 5 feet to 3 feet to allow the construction of a new addition to his home. The public hearing for this variance re- quest has been set for February 14, 1983. cc: City Planner KN/ej a ~% CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 38 February 14, 1983 Agenda The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Members: Subject: Transitory Ordinance Providing for Certain Capital Improvements, Second Reading. On January 24, 1983, the city council gave first reading These capital improvement projects were approved in the 1983 Capital Improvement budget for the city, and include the following: The total 1983 Special Revenue expenditures for capital improvement purposes is $300,000. However, $54,000 of that amount is scheduled fbr the Lincoln Hills project which is not included in the attached transitory ordinance. s. It is recommended that the city council give second read- ing approval to the attached transitory ordinance, appropriating monies from the Special Revenue Fund for the projects described above. Respectfully submitted, • ~~~~ Karl Nollenberger City Manager cc: Program Directors Finance Coordinator TRANSITORY ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF ~~ONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of Richfield Does Ordain: Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making of Capital Improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of ex- penditures for such improvements which are authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, subd. 2 of the City Charter, are ae follows: Energy Improvements $ 45,000 City Garage Improvements 15,000 Penn Avenue Fire Station 71,000 Park Land Acquisition 30,000 Forestry 25,000 Richfield Lake Pathway System 15,000 Memorial Park-Planning 10,000 Ice Arena Improvements 3,000 Total $246,000 Section 3: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council action. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk