Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12-10-84 agenda
:OA5 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 452 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Designating Acting City Clerk There is an item on the agenda providing for the designation of an Acting City Clerk. Periodically, the City Clerk is not available to execute certain legal documents or conduct official City business. While such occasions are not frequent, it is essential that some individual be designated as the Acting City Clerk when such occasions arise, so that the normal course of City business may continue uninterrupted. ?. During the latter part of December, the City Clerk will be out of the City. During that same period of time, the City will be involved in the issuance of Industrial Development Redevelopment Bonds, which will require certain certification provided by the City Clerk or a designated Acting City Clerk. Thus it is essential that the Acting City Clerk be appointed prior to that time. The staff is proposing that the Administrative Services Director be designated to serve as the Acting City Clerk. Currently, Steven Devich is acting in the capacity of Administrative Services Director, and has been named in the attached resolution. It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution designating the Acting City Clerk. R ectfu? mitted, ohn G. Cart ight City Manager JGC/eja cc: City Clerk Acting Administrative Services Director • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ACTING CITY CLERK WHEREAS, during the course of conducting official City business, provisions of law mandate the processing or certification of various documents by the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, it may be necessary for the City Clerk to be periodically absent from work, and WHEREAS, during such absences or for any other reason it would be beneficial to designate an Acting City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. Steven L. Devich is designated Acting City Clerk and is hereby invested with full power and authority to act in the capacity of City Clerk during the absence or inavailability of the City Clerk. 2. This designation supercedes and revokes any prior designation of Acting City Clerk and shall remain in full force and effect until modified by further action of the city council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of December, 1984. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk 0 . RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ACTING CITY CLERK BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. Steven L. Devich is designated acting city clerk and is hereby invested with full power and authority to act in the capacity of city clerk during the absence or inavailability of the city clerk. 2. This designation supercedes and revokes any prior designation of acting city clerk and shall remain in full force and effect until modified by further action of the city council. • • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 451 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Appointment of Energy Awareness Commissioners, 'Extension of Energy Aide Position Council Members: This letter requests the City Council to consider appointment of Energy Awareness Commissioners, to authorize a resolution to secure the awarded $15,000 grant funds from the Department of Energy and Economic Development (DEED) for energy program administration, and extend the part-time temporary Energy Aide position through March, 1985. As council members may recall from the November 13th Council meeting, appointments to the Energy Awareness Commission are a prerequisite to receiving the $15,000 from DEED. Staff has continued to contact community groups and organizations for persons interested in participating on the Richfield Energy Awareness Commission. As indicated in Council Memo No. 187, Nov. 29, 1984 (attached), two applications, one from George Devries and one from John Peterson were received for council consideration. Since that memo was issued, two additional applications have been received and reviewed by staff. The two applicants already evaluated by staff and referred to the Council appear to meet the requirements for volunteer and low and moderate income person advocacy. The two additional applicants, Paul C. Peabody and Susan A. Berzelius, also have qualifications which deserve consideration. Paul C. Peabody is a retired employee of Honeywell. Mr. Peabody is a current volunteer for the South Hennepin County Human Services Council, assisting in the processing of applications for the fuel assistance program. In this capacity, he visits and interviews a number of lower-income households, helping these people attempt to meet their basic energy needs. Mr. Peabody also participates as a volunteer in the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program, a free tax preparation service for the elderly and handicapped. Although not an expert on • energy issues, Mr. Peabody has a working familiarity with energy programs for lower income people. Thus, it appears this applicant has experience working with low and moderate income people and volunteer groups and would be an appropriate appointment to the Energy Awareness Commission. -2- Susan Berzelius is currently employed as a printing coordinator at Random Specialities. She is a long time resident of Richfield and is concerned about preserving the quality of the community as it grows. Ms. Berzelius has an extensive background in child care services, and as such is sensitive to community needs in the family service realm. She was instrumental in establishing a local sliding fee program for child care. Ms. Berzelius has served on the Richfield Youth Commission, on the Board of the Greater Minneapolis Day Care organization, and also on the Board of the Hennepin County Suburban Child Care Association. She is familiar with the dynamics of advisory commissions, and would no doubt be comfortable with an appointment to any of the three commissions, which she has applied for. It appears that Ms. Berzelius has little background and/or experience in the energy field outside of being a utility ratepayer. Staff suggests Ms. Berzelius be considered for appointment to other commissions to which she has applied. It is staff's opinion that the appointment of Mr. Devries, Mr. Peterson, and Mr. Peabody, and the authorization of the attached resolution for entering into a transfer of funds agreement with DEED, satisfies the State requirement for the $15,000 grant. These monies would allow the continuation of the "Bundle-Up" program elements in 1985: energy education • workshops, marketing of various energy programs, promotion of home energy audits, assistance in energy financing, and the installation of energy-saving home improvements. With the DEED grant funds secured, the extension of the Energy Aide position through March 31, 1985, would -ensure the delivery of Neighborhood Energy Workshops in January and March, providing an opportunity for all interested citizens to participate. Over 130 homeowners attended the December 1 workshop, attesting to the need and interest in the further delivery of this opportunity. -expedite the delivery of the Hennepin County residential "shared savings" demonstration project. Over 500 direct mail solicitations for "Shared Savings" are being sent out per week in Richfield through February. -allow a longer period of time to accept applications for the Minnegasco "house doctor" pilot project, thereby ensuring adequate response and verification of acceptable household energy improvements. -provide additional opportunities for presentations to senior groups and handicapped peoples organizations - two client groups particularly appropriate for the "house doctor" program. -ensure continuity in promotion of the city's energy programs, especially those elements just underway in October and November; -3- -provide time for initial program evaluation of the • city's energy programs; and -not require additional allocation from the city's general fund because the monies would be provided by the DEED grant. To ensure uninterrupted delivery of the residential energy programs in Richfield through 1985, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which will: 1. Appoint three new commissioners (Mr. Devries, Mr. Peterson, and Mr. Peabody) to the Energy Awareness Commission to comply with DEED requirements; fe JGC/eja 2. Direct the City Manager to take necessary necessary actions with the Department of Energy and Economic Development to secure the $15,000 Community Energy Council Grant that has been awarded to Richfield; and 3. Authorize the extension of the Energy Aide position through March 31, 1985. pectfu'lly mitted, Tjohn G . 'Car fight City Manager 0 • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL GRANT APPOINTMENT OF ENERGY AWARENESS COMMISSIONERS AND EXTENSION OF ENERGY PROGRAM AIDE POSITION WHEREAS, there is an ongoing need for residential energy conservation programs in the City of Richfield, and a significant demand for energy education, home energy audits, low- cost home energy loans, and energy-saving home improvements; and WHEREAS, the ongoing administration, marketing, promotion and coordination of these residential energy programs is primarily the responsibility of the Energy Program Aide; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield wishes to continue its residential energy conservation programs by entering into a grant agreement with the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, this grant agreement would extend from January 1, 1985 through December 31, 1985, and allow for the implementation of the Richfield Residential Energy Conservation Project; and • WHEREAS, before the City of Richfield can receive the $15,000 Community Energy Council Grant, the City, must provide written assurance to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development that the Richfield Energy Awareness Commission is composed of representatives from small business, labor, senior citizen, volunteer, and low/moderate income categories; and WHEREAS, the City Council can make this assurance with the appointment of additional Energy Awareness Commissioners; BE IT RESOLVED, THEREFORE, by this City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: A. Additional members, as specified in the meeting minutes, are hereby appointed to the Richfield Energy Awareness Commission, thereby assuring representation of small business, labor, senior citizen, volunteer, and low/moderate income categories. B. The City of Richfield shall enter into a grant agreement with the State of Minnesota for the project entitled the Richfield Residential Energy Conservation Project to be conducted during the period from January 1, 1985 through December 31, 1985. 40 C. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute certifications as required and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Richfield. -2- D. The Energy Program Aide position is extended through March 31, 1985, to insure the successful implementation of the Richfield Residential Energy Conservation Project. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 10th day of December, 1984. John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: • 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA i Office of City Manager November 29, 1984 Council Memorandum No.187 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Appointments to the Energy Awareness Commission Council Members: As indicated at the November 13, 1984 City Council meeting, Richfield's Energy Awareness Commission must have a membership which fulfills state guidelines before the $15,000 Grant can be received from the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development (DEED). The city must provide DEED with written assurance that our Energy Awareness Commission (EAC) represents volunteer organizations and lower-income persons in order to receive the grant. The Commission already represents the other required catagories: small business, labor, and senior citizens. Three vacancies currently exist on the commission. Two applications to date have been received. Staff has contacted numerous community groups, soliciting nominations for commissioners. First, the current Energy Awareness Commission had an opportunity to discuss candidates and make recommendations at their November 20th meeting. Second, several organizations including V.E.A.P., (Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People),the League of Women Voters, The Jaycees, United Way, and South Hennepin Human Services Council were contacted. Third,the Richfield Sun printed a front page article and a display advertisement concerning the commission vacancies. The article "New Energy Commission Members Would Help City Obtain $15,000 Grant" ran in Nov. 19th edition, and was delivered to all Richfield residences. The advertisement requested "Motivated Individuals With A General Interest In Energy" for the Energy Awareness Commission. A copy of the article and ad are attached. With the November 26th deadline for applications now past, and in the interest of preparing recommendations for the Council for the December 10, 1984 meeting, a discussion of the two applicants, George DeVries and John Peterson follows. -2- Mr.DeVries is a retired industrial arts teacher for the Richfield public schools. He has participated in the National and Minnesota Education Associations, and has been an officer of the Parent/Teacher Association. He has also worked closely with handicapped children through the Special Children's Recreation Committee. Staff believes Mr. DeVries could effectively represent the interest and concerns of volunteer organizations. Mr. DeVries also appears to be able to represent the needs of low and moderate income persons. His dealings in the public schools with single parents, especially working parents, has given him insights into the hardships that these people face day- to-day. He has also worked in the free lunch program through the public schools, assisting lower-income families in securing basic needs. In conversations with staff, Mr. DeVries has indicated that he has residential energy retrofit experience (he has installed a high efficiency furnace and air conditioner, set-back thermostat, and additional insulation). Staff believes these household energy use decisions represent an understanding andinterest in energy conservation that,when considered with his concern for people, make Mr. DeVries an appropriate appointment. . Mr. Peterson, is currently the President of North Central Energy Counselors, Inc., an energy consulting firm. Mr. Peterson was one of the first employees of the Minnesota Energy Agency (now DEED) and served for three years as their Director of Energy Conservation. In conversations with staff, he has professed a working knowledge of low-income energy assistance programs, as he was instrumental in their early development at the Energy Agency. In regards to volunteer organization representation, Mr. Peterson has first-hand experience as a volunteer chairman of the "Minnesota Energy Conference". This is a conference for commercial, industrial and institutionl engineers, architects, and utility professionals. He is well aware of the innumerable tasks and responsibilities of working with volunteers and utilizing volunteer networks to successfully orchestrate a professional energy conference. Mr. Peterson has extensive background in the energy field, and presently, by profession, has an expertise in conservation in commercial and industrial business sector. Mr. Peterson's extensive energy conservation knowledge and ability to work with people, makes him an appropriate appointment. If these two candidates to the Energy Awareness Commission meet with City Council approval, there would still be one opening on the commission. Staff will continue to contact community groups and organizations to fill that opening. However, it appears the two applicants adequately represent the state requirements for being active volunteers and being advocates for low and moderate income persons. It is • -3- appropriate to proceed in considering their appointment to ensure that the grant funds can be secured in a timely manner. The City Council will be asked to consider the appointment of Mr. DeVries and Mr. Peterson at the December 10, 1984 Council meeting. p?ctf bmitted , ,I ohn U,,Caktwri ity ge JGC/eja • 0 t1 a NQ?-2° ltoit ?3 No & eeer ?eys Co_ SSA n members ro de f%rnr- 1 rangy.. in, 0 $151.00 by MarkJof?sva -. rrF-3 .: - ..: 't •. ?? + } wlr- '°S? gram. ata ?, migrant will not.meet final with written verification- that seeking', tfix-M local people tar-__DEE approval until: after-the the. new commission members serve= the Energy A wareness - new: commission members are represent- low- and middle-in Cb _ sa =the = appointed by the Richfield City eon. groups _and-vohinLeer or- tali_fora;t3,A9tlgrant f 1.3ie 'state's De the ;::appropriate =--ganiaations__ Members: alsoi, partment v€ ? nernbe- area found, the-.., aW should be _ ' midge ; Energy-. and?.Econo lam" R is be made:ata motivatediadivititials whahave! veIopment f DEER rt ' Dew 44city cainiil nieetin an active interesten energg con- The money would =aIIovP the -< 'i'fi new members mustco shrvatioaaccording to &el . city to a tenth coiitrae wrttt to s4tets egtiir=_ die_ field:. Cif -Manager..John--- an energsraideaftLAftimk-i9i? ??tWBat, Wit' cipaVenergy- ghrtwright,.,. ?.. =ti?. The aide: was hired. to _cgnu' a : be, ? cmp . of-- required' demographic ister the- c-V_-nBUadk-_ ": -'s- IIP?P?Tle°€iit?variiiciis deaior. - alrea mPTesested. oa Richfield enerb- m?ruve?. ' 'categories: the- city's energg; coinmissioa r nlEV TQ Page- ?; w - En rm?? e FAA - ?" .-?- . '- .-f1?TERESTIl1?ENERCYri:. - iacluile• t?esa~ senor ? - citize and tabor . ?_' CONS?#VATIOM The DEED,gtan?v`voaklalIovr-?{?sVCN?`? f3f 'K- the city'g?? =ffp? liar: ALTERNATIVEENERGY? field' program to eapand imp second year vrf ':operatiaa. TIiECITY of RIC>iFiELilwouL D .,House Doctor-Prot Pi?ozect" LIKE YOU TO VOLUNTEER AS AN - tion mg for- free fioaie_weath iza ar ENERGY AWARENESS COMMISSIONER. izatio come resideats?:w? bye added = ;?? pro8razn'e?e-literat-ure. Motivated individuals wW a general interest. in to the $10 home energy, -audits .and; energy are now being solicited for the Energy below market mwnesotaxous `-Aw ess-Commission. Successful candidates ins.: and- Finance Assoeiatiom., .. ? - active:- in. volunteer, groups or be a loans for energy - ? ? 4 beer advocate;.-or have .a: professional- in- -i -? h Ierest- in and - be an advocate for lovri and Persons interested in serving modera_ to income persons and their needs. on the Richfield Knergg Aware,;-' ness Commission may caII - 'r ^ - Mg-7521 for further ii f6rmation. . - ContactSTEVE WARN at City Haif- 869-7521 for an application.. . • - Applications must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. November 26, 1984 to Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland _ Ave. S. - CITY OF RICHFIELD COMMISSION/COMMI11EE APPLICATION FORM NAME De'T 113" S SZOHGI ED.-1A RD Last First Middle HOME ADDRESS 7 50£? 1° th Avenue South PHONE Home $ 69 - 5210 APPOINTIMENT PR ERENCE: Business --------- Advisory Board of Health Civil Service Commission Community Services Cc=ission energy Awareness Commission Fourth of July Cc=ittee Hunan Rights Commission Planning Commission Senior Citizens/Handicapped Commission Sister City international Other Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory commission and why you are interested in serving: 'oc^e Owner - 10 years. Ex^erienced additional insulation of attic, windows and hot water oires. Irstallaticr_ of ererav efficient furnace, thermostat and central air conditicninz. I am keenly a:vare of the reed to use er_erT efficiently and have an active interest in ener?r conservation-7' CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Dducatioral orzanizations and ca=ittees ".Ml, `irnetonka Industrial Arts Club, Discimline Committee; Richfield Schools ;'2-0, Centennial PTA officer, 3-)ecia1Children's Recreation :, mmittee :rlenber. REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) - C?-uck Stcez - ?rind--al, Richfieldi Junior =i -h 'School - Ji:- "wanson, Richfield District LOA Ren., Henr_enin Court-r ?ob :isn - Richfield Ichools Credit Union OCCUJPATION: jndjjst-; ? l 1-ttz a _'1Pr` ?i r.y,ri c1 a >> ^1 ? ?+ j ..??1 c (Retired) Return to City Manager's Office, 5700 Pcr?:_nc .ve., Richfield, MN ;z5423 C:.mplete in Black ink or Typewriter 0 DATE FORM • ==CtN JOM? D. HOME ADDRESS 6245 Upton Ave. So. '-Richfield, .1'. ,7423 PHONE Home 561-3488 APPOINTMENT PR'RENCE: Business Same Advisory Board of Health Civil Service Commission Community Services Ccamiss of n Energy Awareness Ccmmission Fourth of July Ca®ittee Human Rights Cc=ission Planning Commission Senior Citizens/Handicapped Commission Sister City nternational Other Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory commission and why you are interested in serving: One of first emnl:oyees of the 1.1irn. Energy, agency (now =!)); served for three years as Director or Energy Conservation For Ecati 17ency. Served as Director of the Deat. of Emery Hobey.rell ^ransmortable Solar Laboratory for 15 months following retirement =rom Agency. :.et uv my own er_erzY consulting firm and have we=ked on various aspects of ener^y ,ror?i and conservation, continui:ing on a limited scale to date. wave sevred as General Chairman of theinnesota 'Energy Cor_ference now in 11th year, for last four years. See attached brochure CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Cther than above activities, which touch on professional engineers, A=ELZ, other such contacts, no special civic or community activities at the .moment. I h??e on one +.he time the o led.. the mnergy a*aseness omw scion. bacYugrourd and the interest to work REFERENCES (OPTIONAL) ;Tar=en Spannaus, Dorsey and N-hitrey, 2200 1st I at.3k. Fl. E. 3?0-2600 C. Wayne Courtney, '.•:a7or of Edina, 4313 Dton ?lace, Edina, 75424 0/2228523 udre :.ei 1 A, Eiley, !-E;505 C Tower, Gov. Ctr. , j; 487 348-29C8 OCCUPATION: =resident, ':orth Central Enerc-' vounselorj, _Inc* Return to City Manager's Office, 6700 Portland Ave., Richfield, MN 55u23 Complete in Black Ink or Typewriter C • • ""'Welcome i We are pleased and proud to welcome you to the Tenth Annual Minnesota Energy Con- ference. Minnesota is the only state which has reached that ten. year milestone. We attribute that success directly to the sup- port and interest you bring to these annual conferences. AW The committee and the sponsors are deeply grateful for your loyalty and commitment. It has been our purpose over the years to bring you j the newest and best information on the various facets of the energy field - its production, supplies, efficient use, future prospects and the latest technology in mechanical and engineering areas. We continue that tradition in this year's general and technical sessions and in the out- standing exhibits from the nation's leading-energy-related companies. We trace part of the improved state and national economy to our increased efficiency in energy use. We believe that your participation in these conferences has been an important part of that improvement. We must continue that trend. Please contact me or the other committee members during these next two days, or in the future, and let us know how we can make these conferences more worth- while to you. Thanks for coming! John D. Peterson Conference Chairman Our Purpose We designed the Tenth Annual Minnesota Energy Confer- ence to help commercial, industrial and institutional energy users achieve greater efficiency and economy in energy use. We invited top energy experts and practition- ers to give informative lectures and present case studies. Participants can meet with a variety of manufacturers and view their exhibits of the latest energy conservation equipment and materials. We hope to send you home armed with information and ideas, better equipped to assess your energy needs and able to implement the most effective and appropriate changes. is CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 450 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Modification of the Guidelines for the Issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds Council Members: On November 29, 1983, the City Council adopted the Industrial Revenue Bond (IDR) guidelines, a copy of which is attached. At the time these guidelines were adopted, IDR's were available virtually without limitation of use. As discussed at the August 20th City Council meeting, the Federal Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, imposed a volume cap on IDR's issued by states. The State Legislature adopted the Minnesota Federal Limitations Act which provides for the manner in which Minnesota will disperse its allocation. Under the state law, Richfield should receive an allocation of approximately $3,600,000 for 1985• Because of the relatively small amount of bonding available, it is appropriate to modify point number (5) of the guidelines to indicate that the City Council will give a priority to those developments proposed for an established redevelopment project. Polic Number Five Which Was Ado ted b the City Council on November 29, 1983 is as follows: "In considering the issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, the city council will evaluate whether a proposed project provides additional employment opportunities; incentives for future development; and likely increases in the city's tax revenues". Proposed Modification of Number Five. In considering the issuance of IDR bonds, the city council will first consider the need and give highest priority for such financing to help achieve the goals and objectives of an established redevelopment project. Other factors to be evaluated regardless of location include the number of additional employment opportunities to be provided, whether the project will be an incentive for future development; and, the impact on the city's tax revenues. -2- It is recommended that the City Council adopt the above modification to point #5 of the Guidelines For The Issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds. Re ectful y ^itted, Z ?/1/L'?/G UZIi i ?ohn G. Cart ght City Manager JGC/eja 41 0 GUIDELINES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA The Municipal Industrial Development Act (Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, 1980, as amended) authorized the City of Richfield to issue Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (IDR bonds). In the past, the city has received periodic requests to issue Municipal Industrial Revenue Bonds, and it is anticipated that additional requests will be made in the future. This type of bond can be issued by the City of Richfield as a means of encouraging the development of economically sound industry and commerce within the community, and as a means of maintaining and promoting economic and industrial vitality. The following guidelines will be utilized to help both the city council and the staff to fairly and consistently evaluate IDR bond requests. 1. Projects for which IDR financing is sought shall be either of an industrial, commercial or public purpose nature, and shall be compatible with the overall development plans and objectives.of the city. The project shall also be evaluated in terms of its compatability and consistency with the zoning ordinance, comprehensive plan, housing plan, and other similar ordinances and plans of the City of Richfield. 2. The applicant shall have the responsibility to reimburse the city for all expenses incurred in reviewing the application, preparing legal documents, and for other administrative activities and related additional expenses. As a part of this application procedure, the applicant will be required to submit a non-refundable fee of $2,500. 3. The decision by the city council to issue these bonds shall not constitute an endorsement or favorable finding by the council as to the financial feasibility of the project or of its likely success. 4. The city will generally not consider the issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds having an aggregate principal amount of less than $300,000. This limit may be waived under appropriate circumstances such as the expansion of an existing business or industry or for the financing of a highly sought industry or business. 5. In considering the issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, the city council will evaluate whether a proposed project provides additional employment opportunities; incentives for future development; and likely increases in the city's tax revenues. 0 • -2- 6. The city council shall have the right to review and not issue municipal revenue bonds at any time prior to the actual time of issuance of the bonds, if it determines that it is in the best interests of the city not to issue these bonds. The city may also withdraw from participation should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. A decision of the city council with respect to withdrawing from the process shall be noncontestible. 7. The Department of Community Development of the City of Richfield shall be responsible for the coordination of the processing of applications for Industrial and Commercial Development Revenue Bond financing. 8. Tax exempt mortgage financing will be allowed as an alternative to bond financing but will be subject to the same policies, rules, and regulations as bond financing. 9. The applicant shall be required to furnish seven copies of all materials required by the city. The applicant shall select qualified financial consultants and/or underwriters to prepare • all the necessary documents and materials as required by the Richfield City Attorney's office. 10. All applications submitted for consideration by the city council shall be furnished on forms provided by the State of Minnesota, Department of Commerce Securities Division, for approval of Municipal Industrial Revenue Bonds. The city council may, at its discretion, require the applicant to provide additional materials under certain circumstances. 11. Projects of a unique nature may result in the city council requesting that the applicant provide additional financial or economic information so that the city council may fairly evaluate the desirability and feasibility of the project. • # Z 2.0o CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 449 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Satellite Dish Ordinance, First Reading Council Members: Attached for your review and consideration is an ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission concerning satellite dish antennas. The city's current ordinance requires that a special use permit be obtained before a satellite antenna can be installed in a residential zoning district. • In order to eliminate the necessity for a property owner to go through the special use permit process, a proposal has been explored for making a satellite dish antenna a permitted accessory use. The commission had numerous discussions concerning potential standards and restrictions which should be placed on the location of satellite dish antennas. The commission finally concluded that a satellite dish antenna should be subject to the same restrictions as other accessory structures such as garages. The restrictions which apply to accessory uses are: (1) maximum rearyard coverage is 30%; (2) frontyard setback - 30 feet; (3) rearyard setback - 2 feet; (4) streetside sideyard setback - 15 feet; (5) interior sideyard setback - 2 feet (6) corner lot adjacent to a key lot, the sideyard on the street side of such corner lot shall have a width at least equal to the front yard of such key lot; (7) accessory building shall not be closer than five feet to the main building; (8) interior lot abutting upon two streets, no accessory building shall encroach upon the half of the lot abutting the stret, nor be situated forward of the front building line; • (9) interior lot abutting upon two streets, no accessory building shall encroach upon the one-fourth of the lot abutting each street; -2- (10) corner lot - no accessory building shall be located forward of the building front line or its extension nor nearer the side street than the street side building line or its extension where the adjoining lot is a key lot; (11) corner lot - abutting more than two streets, no accessory building shall encroach upon any one-fourth of the lot abutting any street; (12) additional requirements for other allowed uses: No building shall be located within 50 feet of any lot line of a residential district. The required setbacks shall be increased by one foot for each foot of building height in excess of 42 feet. (13) whenever a lot in the R Residence District is sub- divided in accordance with the provisions found in Chapter III, Part VI, Section 3.55A, the minium building setback requirements shall be applied as if the subdivision had not been made. An antenna can be roof-mounted, but if it exceeds 10 feet in height above the highest point of the roof a special use permit will have to be obtained. City Manager Recommendation The City Manager recomends that the City Council add the further restriction on the placement of satellite dish antennas . by prohibiting same in any front yard or in the (street side only) sideyard of a corner lot. It is recommended that the council give first reading approval to the attached ordinance and schedule second reading and the public hearing of this matter for January 14, 1985• R ectful y ?s itted, U/74' Pnoh G . Cart ht City Manager r JGC/eja 0 BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III, PART IV OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MN CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 3.27, subdivision 3 is amended by adding the following paragraph and renumbering the subsequent paragraphs: (10) "Satellite antenna" means structure and all supporting apparatus which is used for receiving satellite signals. If the structure is roof-mounted and exceeds 10 feet in height above the highest point of the roof, it is considered a roof-mounted antenna. If the structure is ground-mounted it is considered an accessory building. Section 3.30, subdivision 2 is amended by adding the following paragraph (k): (k) Satellite Antenna Section 3.31A, subdivision 2 is amended by adding the following paragraph (g): (g) Satellite Antenna Passed by the city council this day of , 1985. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia Bergh My Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 448 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Transitory Ordinance Providing for Capital Improvements. Second Reading. Council Members: On September 27, 1984, the city council approved a revision to the 1984 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB). The total CIB expenditure remains the same. Included in that revision were changes to two capital project appropriations from the Special Revenue Fund. The revisions reduce the public safety . building account by $5,500 and increade the city hall remodeling (lobby/licensing area) by $5,500. The CIB projects funded by special revenues for 1984 and 1984 revised budgets remain the same as adopted, or $393,000. The list of CIB projects funded all or in part by profits from the municipal liquor store operations for 1984 (Special Revenue Fund) are: 1984 1984 Budget Revised Budget Garage Furnace/Roof $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Forestry $ 27,500 $ 27,500 Memorial Park Improve. $200,000 $200,000 Legion Lake $ 10,500 $ 10,500 Swimming Pool Boiler $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Ice Arena Improvements $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Public Safety Buildings (Penn Fire Station) $ 25,000 $ 19,500 City Hall Remodeling (Lower level) $ 20,000 $ 20,000 City Hall Remodeling (Lobby/Licensing) $ 20,000 $ 25,500 $393,000 $393,000 • -2- The City Council approved first reading of this ordinance at the November 26, 1984 city council meeting. It is recommended that the City Council hold the public hearing and approve second reading of this ordinance at the December 10, 1984 City Council meeting. pectfu omitted, LLB ohn G. Cart ght City Manager JGC/eja 0 • • TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of Richfield Does Ordain: Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue Fund for the making.of Capital Improvements listed in Section 2 hereof, for which the city would be authorized to issue general obligation bonds. Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures for such improvements which are authorized to be paid from the Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, subd. 2 of the City Charter, are as follows: Garage Furnace/Roof Forestry Memorial Park Improvements Legion Lake Swimming Pool Boiler Ice Arena Improvements Public Safety Buildings (Penn Fire Station) City Hall Remodeling-lower level City Hall Remodeling - lobby/ license Total $ 60,000 $ 27 , 500 $200,000 $ 10,500 $ 15,000 $ 15 , 000 $ 19,500 $ 20 , 000 $ 25,500 $393,000 Section 3: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by council action. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of December, 1984. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ?aw Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 447 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Public Hearing to Adopt Housing Policy Statement Council Members: December 10, 1984, has been set as the date for a public hearing to consider adopting policies necessary to preserve access to mortgage subsidy bonds (also known as housing mortgage revenue bonds). A copy of the policy statement accompanies this letter for your consideration. During 1984, Congress adopted, and the President signed, the Deficit Reduction Act. Title VI of the Act concerns mortgage subsidy bonds or tax exempt bonds. These bonds are utilized to help provide below market interest rate mortgages to first time buyers of single family homes. The Act was adopted during the summer of 1984. However, the Treasury Department has not yet formulated regulations which would clarify the requirements of the legislation. Absent specific regulations, bond attorneys and underwriters are of the opinion that for a community to utilize mortgage subsidy bonds in 1985, it is necessary for a City Council to schedule a public hearing and consider a report which is a statement of the "housing, development and income distribution policies" that would be followed in issuing the bonds. Such action must be taken prior to December 31, 1984. The attached 111984 Housing Policy Statement for 1985 Housing Programs", if acceptable to the City.Council, summarizes Richfield's housing, development, and income distribution policies when utilizing mortgage subsidy bonds. This policy statement is a summary of the population characteristics, goals, objectives, and needs, which demonstrate why mortgage subsidy bonds are an important financial tool for providing affordable housing opportunities. Further, this policy statement is an excerpt, with minor modifications, of the concluding summary section of the Housing Plan. The City Council and HRA adopted the Housing Plan, a fifty page document which analyzes Richfield housing needs, after a public hearing, November 29, 1983. • -2- In the Housing Plan and this policy statement, seven • different types of programs are suggested as meeting Richfields housing needs if the mortgage subsidy bond financial tool is available. The programs include: -attached forms of ownership housing for young families -multi-unit ownership and rental housing for elderly which free up existing housing for larger family households. -scattered site housing for young families -sale of existing housing to young families -multi-unit ownership and rental housing for families and elderly within existing -,acated schools -rental and ownership housing for families and elderly within or outside redevelopment districts (such as the LHN) -a program of rehabilitation and energy conservation improvements The seven programs are not all inclusive. They are mentioned as examples of the types of housing programs projected to be useful in providing housing assistance during 1985 and through the next decade based on present experiences, interpretation of need, and the availability of appropriate resources such as mortgage subsidy bonds. The policy statement also briefly discusses certain income policies for first time homebuyers purchasing single family homes. Again, as in the Housing Plan, the incomes referred to are 80 percent to 110 percent of the median family income, depending_ on which of two data sources is used and found greater. According to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), 110 percent of the median family income is $34,760. 100 percent of the income limit established by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) is $35,000. Thus, the greater MHFA figure would be utilized for determining eligibility for a single family mortgage subsidy bond program. During the first six months of a program, all monies must be reserved for persons with adjusted gross incomes no more than 80 percent of the MHFA figure (i.e., $28,000). It is recommended that the City Council approve the "1984 Housing Policy Statement for 1985 Housing Programs" following public hearing by adopting the attached resolution. R pectfu??I1 bmitted, ; 'w- John G. Car wrig t City Manager 0 JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD i RESOLUTION NO. 84- RESOLUTION ADOPTING A 1984 HOUSING REPORT AND POLICY STATEMENT TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES TREASURY Be it Resolved by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, (the "City"), as follows. 1. That the City after holding a public hearing adopts the 1984 Housing Report and Policy Statement attached hereto as Exhibit A, (the "Report"). 2. The Mayor is authorized to have the Report published under his signature and to submit the Report and a copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the United States Treasury. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of December, 1984. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 1984 HOUSING REPORT AND POLICY STATEMENT 16 or 1985 HOUSING PROGRAMS • Section 103 (A) (j) (5) of the Internal Revenue Code (The Code) requires the City to make an annual report and policy statement. The following policy programs could meet the housing needs of the City. Section 1. Policies A. Housing 1. A Program to develop multi-unit attached forms of ownership housing affordable to younger families. 2. A Program to develop multi-unit attached forms of ownership and rental housing for the elderly which in turn increases the availability of existing housing for larger family households. 3. A Program to develop single and multi-unit forms of ownership housing on a scattered site basis that is affordable to younger families 4. A Program to finance the sale of affordable existing housing to younger families. 5. A Program to develop multi-unit attached forms of ownership and rental housing for families and elderly within existing vacated structures such as schools or on cleared land where schools were located. 6. A Program to develop multi-unit rental and ownership housing alternatives for elderly and families within or outside established redevelopment districts. 7. A Program to finance rehabilitation and energy conservation improvements for Richfield housing. The seven programs listed are not all inclusive. They are mentioned here as examples of the types of housing programs projected to be useful in providing housing assistance during 1985 and through the next decade based on present experiences, interpretation of need, and the availability of appropriate resources such as housing mortgage revenue bonds. B. Income 0 States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Minneapolis-St. Paul Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area; or (2) 100 percent of the income limits established by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the City. To ensure that loans will benefit low and moderate income persons, the adjusted gross income of a mortgagor at the time of application for a single family mortgage loan shall not exceed the greater of: (1) 110 percent of the median family income as estimated by the United Additionally, for the first six (6) months of a single family program, all mortgage monies will be reserved for persons with Adjusted Gross Incomes no more than 80% of the above mentioned standards. • • Section 2 Assessment No mortgage housing subsidy bonds were issued in 1984. By By Its City Manager Its Mayor 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA / Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 446 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Final Development Plan and Special Use Permit and Offstreet Parking Permit for the Market Plaza Development. Council Members: HISTORY In July of 1984, the city approved a preliminary PUD plan for the Market Plaza mixed use development on the block bounded by 65th Street, 66th Street, Graham Avenue and Lyndale Avenue with the following stipulations: 1) all landscaped areas are to be irrigated 2) that the appropriate easements be provided for landscape purposes adjacent to 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue. 3) That a final utility and drainage plan be submitted for approval by staff. 4) That a fire protection system be submitted for approval by the public safety department. The developer has requested city approval of a final development plan and a special use permit for the proposed mixed use development. PROPOSAL Market Plaza Corporation recently revised its development plan for the subject property. The current proposal includes the following: 1. A thirteen story, 157 unit condominium structure on the west end of the site. There will be two levels of parking underneath the structure which will accomodate 123 cars. (This number could be reduced to 119 depending on the size of mechanical rooms necessary.) There will be surface parking for an additional 18 cars. 2. 74,566 gross square feet of commercial space on one level with an interior mall. The commercial structure will be on the.north side of the site. On-grade parking for 295 cars will be provided on the southeast corner of the site. -2- 3. 162 units of rental housing will be provided above a portion of the commercial space. The rental housing structure will be 8 stories in height. Parking for 221 cars will be provided for the rental housing. 210 of these spaces will be located in a parking garage located underneath the commercial space and the remainder will be on grade. 4. The existing Wendy's restaurant on the corner of 65th Street and Lyndale Avenue will remain. The proposal differs from the PUD plan previously approved in the following ways: 1. Condominium structure A. The 65th Street setback of the parking garage has been reduced from 15 feet to 4 feet. B. Ten additional condominium units have been added to the structure by eliminating the loft units previously indicated on the top floor of the condominium structure. Total number of units has been increased from 147 to 157 units. • C. The potential third level of parking within the condominium parking garage has been eliminated because of the excessive construction costs. An additional 10 outside parking stalls have been provided. D. The exterior design of the structure has been changed to eliminate the slanted roof. The structure will essentially have a flat roof with some slanted roof elements and dormor projections on the south and east ends of the building. E. Graham Avenue will be vacated and will be used for additional open space amenities for the condominium structure. F. The turn has been parking. cut onto break at exit. 2. Commercial/A around at the entrance to the condominium eliminated to provide additional surface This also results in an additional curb 66th Street. There will not be a median this location and it may serve as only an partment Structure • A. Five additional commercial parking spaces will be provided to increase the total number ofspaces from 290 to 295. The number of garage spaces available for the apartment units has been increased from 209 to 210 spaces. B. 40 The gross floor area of the commercial portion of the structure has increased from 70,000 square feet to 74,566 square feet. C. Two receiving areas for delivery vehicles have been added to the plan. One in the Southwest corner of the commerical space and another in the northeast corner of the structure within the unimproved right-of-way of 65th Street. D. An additional garage exit has been added in the northeast corner of the structure. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Section 3.34 A, subdivision 6 of the zoning ordinance requires that prior to commencement of any construction or development of the land and after the rezoning, an applicant shall submit a final development plan consistent with the council approved PUD plan and an application for a special use permit for said development. A special use permit in conformance with the final development plan must be obtained before the PUD district can be devoted to the uses provided in such plan. The ordinance also requires that the final development plan be in compliance with the approved PUD plan and • any conditions imposed by the council. Compliance shall not be considered substantial if there is, a) more than 10% change in the floor area in any one structure, b) more than 10% change in the orginal proof separation of buildings, c) any change in the original approved setback from property lines,d) more than 5% change in ground area covered by the building or, e) any change in the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to the gross floor area of the building. STAFF REVIEW AND FINDINGS 1. The proposed final development plan is not in substantial compliance with the PUD plan because there has been a change in the approved setback from property line of the condominium structure and because the ratio of off-street parking and loading space to the gross floor area in the building has changed. Therefore the final development plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to City Council action. 2. The reduction of the setback of the condominium structure from 65th Street should not be detrimental to the public welfare. While staff has some concern about the minimal setbacks along 65th Street, the reduction of the condominium garage setback from 15 to 4 feet should not worsen the situation. The condominium garage setback will still be 4 feet greater than the apartment/commercial structure and the condominium structure itself will still be setback approximately 50 feet from 65th Street. -4- 3. The change in the off-street parking ratio initially concerned staff, especially as it related to the condominium structure. The elimination of the third parking level in the condominium structure reduced the ratio of parking stalls per unit to less than one per unit. Further investigation into the number of parking stalls provided at similar developments in the metro area indicated that the proposed ratio of .86 parking stalls per unit was in the range of the parking provided at these other developments. The table showing these other project parking ratios is included in the backup for your information. The experience of the Lake Shore Drive condominium across the street also indicates that there should be sufficient parking available for the Woodlake Point condominium project. Lake Shore Drive has been unable to sell approximately 45 of their parking spaces. The ratio of parking stalls used to the number of units at Lake Shore Drive would be similar to what would be provided at the Woodlake Point Condominium. The number of stalls indicated for the apartment structure exceeds the minimum ratio required by the PUD ordinance. The applicant has indicated that if there are excess stalls in the apartment garage, and if there was a demand for additional stalls by the condominium that they would be rented to the condominium owners. Lake Shore Drive Condominium Association has also indicated that they would be willing to lease their excess stalls to the Woodlake Condominium if desired. The applicant h.as also indicated that the owners of the commercial structure would not prohibit the use of the commercial parking facilities for visitors to either the condominium or the apartment structures. Based on these facts and assurances, it is staff's feeling that the reduced parking ratio would not be detrimental to the public welfare. 4. Staff has concerns about the proposed receiving facility within the right-of-way of 65th Street. The proposed plan encourages trucks to back in perpendicular to the building. This would result in the trucks blocking one or two lanes of traffic while unloading. Also, the boulevard area itself is only slightly over 7 feet wide between the curb and the building. This is not sufficient to allow a truck to park parallel to the curb between the curb and th.e building. The receiving area should be designed so that trucks may not park fully or partially within the traveled road way of 65th Street. Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting staff has been meeting with representatives of the applicant to resolve this issue. Because of the design of the building and the need to avoid permitting delivery trucks from using customer parking spaces in the off-street parking lot, there is need to have a receiving facility in the proposed location. The building could • not be shifted to the south because a considerable number of parking stalls would be eliminated. The receiving area cannot be indented into the building area because it would reduce the amount of leasable commercial space which the applicant indicates could jeopardize the project. Therefore staff is exploring the alternative of narrowing the travelled roadway of -5- 65th Street by four feet only in the mid-block area between Lyndale Avenue and Rae Drive. Staff is currently analyzing the impact of several alternatives on parking on 65th Street, traffic flow, and on municipal state aid funding. There is the possibility that some right-of-way on the north side of 65th Street which is not used for sidewalk or street purposes, could be used if it is determined that narrowing 65th Street is undesirable. 5. The grading plan needs further detail concerning grading and the interface between the Wendy's property and the Market Plaza parking lot and, also, within the area of vacated Graham Avenue and its intersection with 65th Street. Additional detail on the grading in these two areas should be submitted to the City engineer for approval. 6. A final plat has not been submitted. 7. The applicant has indicated that the four stipulations on the approval of the PUD plan will be met as follows: A. All landscape areas will be irrigated. B. With the exception of the right hand turn lane at the northwest corner of the intersection of Lyndale and west 66th Street a 20 foot wide landscape east along Lyndale Avenue and West 66th Street will be provided. C. A final grading plan has been included with the PUD plan submittal and is sufficient except as indicated above. D. A final utility plan has not been submitted at this time and cannot be developed until the-final building needs are determined. The applicant indicates that the final design will be submitted at the time that the building permit is applied for. E. The fire protection system final design has not been determined, but they have indicated that they will comply with the building and fire code requirements. 8. The street maintenance personnel has indicated a concern over the potential berming of the unimproved right-of-way along the south side of 65th Street. It is their feeling that a bermed area would seriously reduce the snow storage capacity along there. Therefore, they recommend that the berm not exceed a 5 to 1 slope. The reduction of the berm slope will reduce the softening affect of the proposed landscaping on the building wall adjacent to 65th Street. 9. The proposal generally meets all offstreet parking lot standards and guidelines. The depth of parking stalls is 18 feet rather than the city's minimum guideline of 19 feet. This does not pose a problem because the driving aisle widths are . wider than the city's minimum guidelines. Therefore the net effect is the same as if the minimum guidelines were followed. if STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is staff's opinion that the proposed final development plan, including changes would not be detrimental to the public welfare. Therefore, it is recommended that the final development plan and special use permit be approved with the following stipulations. 1. That condominium owners be given priorty for use of the apartment garage spaces not needed for apartment renters. 2. That condominium and apartment visitors not be prohibited from using the commercial parking spaces on a short term basis. This would not prohibit the applicant from enforcing reasonable restrictions to prevent long term parking which might adversely affect the commercial uses on the site. 3. That the grading details of the interface between the Wendy's property and the Market Plaza property and the area within the vacated Graham Avenue adjacent to 65th Street should be submitted to the city engineer. 4. A final plat should be submitted. 5. That the final utlity plan'be submitted for approval by staff. 6. That a fire protection system be submitted for approval by the public safety department. 7. That no berm be constructed along 65th Street and adjacent to the building, so as to provide space for snow storage. 8. That trucks using the receiving area within the 65th Street right-of-way not be permitted to obstruct traffic in the travelled roadway of 65th Street. It is further recommended that the council approve the offstreet parking layout and authorize the execution of an offstreet parking agreement by passing the attached resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the final development plan and special use permit with the 8 stipulations outlined in the staff recommendations. Respectfu?ll ubmitted, ohn G. art ig City Manager RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT AND CONTRACT FOR OFF-STREET PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICATION NO. 84-2, CONTRACT NO. 2412 Name: Market Plaza Corporation Address: 1650 Shelard Tower Minneapolis, MN 55426 Location: Block bounded by 65th Street, 66th Street Lyndale Avenue, and Graham Avenue Use: condominiums, office, retail and apartments BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the proposed geometric layout of the off-street parking as contained in Off-Street Parking Application No. 84-2, Contract No. 2412 is hereby approved subject to and upon completion of performance of the contract for such off-street parking as hereinafter authorized. 2. That the proposed off-street parking contract for the improvement of said off-street parking, bearing contract no 2412 be placed on file and that the manager be authorized to sign said contract and the clerk be authorized to seal the same for and on behalf of this city. 3. That the off-street parking performance bond be waived because sufficient surety has been provided under the terms of the developer's agreement covering the proposed development on the site. 4. That responsibility for the proper upkeep and maintenance of said off-street parking lot shall remain the responsibility of the off-street parking lot operator in accordance with Ordinance Code 4.05. Adopted by the city council of the City of Richfield this 10th day of December, 1984. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: 0 Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk PARKING RATIOS PROJECT Calvary Coop Augustana Nokomis Becketwood Lake Shore Drive 7500 York Woodlake Point L J NO. OF UNITS ENCLOSED SPACES NO. RATIO EXTERIOR SPACES N0. RATIO TOTAL SPACES NO. RATIO 120 79 .68 29 .24 108 .90 354 90 .25 190 .54 280 .79 208 166 .80 44 .21 210 1.01 238 178 .75 41 .17 -219 .92 178 80 .45 112 .63 192 1.o8 338 167 .49 132 .39 299 - S8 157 116 .74 18 .12 135 .86 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA - 0-/00 Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 445 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Variance Request at 6937 Penn Avenue South Council Members: Mr. Kenneth Pritchett has requested that the city grant a variance to allow expansion of the existing non-conforming single family dwelling at 6937 Penn Avenue. The existing structure does not conform to the city's interior sideyard setback requirement of 5 feet. The existing structure has a setback of 4.1 feet. Mr. Pritchett wishes to construct a 14 x 30 foot addition on to the rear of the existing house and match the existing non-conforming interior sideyard setback of 4.1 feet. The existing lot is also slightly below the city's minimum lot area requirement of 6,750 square feet. The lot contains only 6,675 square feet. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Section 3.30, subdivision 5, requires that single family dwellings in "R" residence districts have a 5 foot interior sideyard setback. 2. Section 3.30, subdivision 4, requires a minimum lot area of 6,750 square feet. 3. Section 3.40, subdivision 6, lists the three conditions which must be met for a variance to be granted. STAFF REVIEW Staff has reviewed the proposal against the three conditions which must be met before a variance may be granted and found the following: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting this land not common to other properties or similar districts. It is staff's opinion that there are no special circumstances present on this site. The site is regular in shape and similar in size to other lots within the neighborhood and within the community as a whole. -2- 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation an enjoyment o substantial property rights. It is staff's opinion that denial of the variance would not preclude reasonable use of the property. The existing single family residential use could continue on the site if the variance is denied. 3. That the granting of the application will not materially and adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood and will not be materially detrimental to the public wel are or injurious to improvements in the neighborhood. It is staff's opinion that the proposal would not be detrimental to the character of the area. The proposed addition would match the existing setback and not worsen the non- conforming sideyard setback. The lot area is also consistent with the lot areas of the surrounding area. The public safety department has indicated that approval of buildings too close to other buildings will eventually increase the workload on the fire division. They indicate that a variance should not be granted unless sprinklers are installed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Because the three conditions for the variance have not been met staff must recommend denial of this variance request. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission on a 4 to 3 vote recommended approval of the variance request. The commission further recommends that zoning ordinance revisions be considered to allow the expansion of non-conforming structures under certain conditions. s ectfu tlbmitted , John G. Cart righ City Manager JGC/eja 9 jOB NO. SURVEY FOR: Ken Pritchett DESCRIBED AS- Lot 14, Flock 10, TIN(DALE BROTI-11RS LINCOLN HILLS 2ND ADDITION, City of Richfield, Hennepin County, ilinnesotn. 50 ??f 66 7r.0 sq.S+ ?joux • Too S9 420 39 ?? fldn• r z 6a t? V 0 M M \ A ej i V ? N j it 50 0 ti ti N o RTt4 / ' = -ZW M n,, M cn } -PENN AVE 11 rte. ?y ? X 30 ? ,? ? ?? a?? a•, r,?2 ?am G??i .yam. .?r?? ?e ??'? . -,ejozal? axe/- ale a? „CJ..2 ?4Gl/! z OYL aa/ "k)-I-& CzQ) 6 19 15 0 z A;) 1 -1) J * \4 VI .1 STREE T + r 11?71`2t n X23 - 2 WR 23? G." ' 1 jt4? 3 22L5? ??? 3 2A = .. ?? 4 cw J 2115 pi 4 (\15& ? 21 1?`? 4 f 1? 4 = 5(11(41 N 2?i4 5 (,3`L W ?'t°c2og (1 2 ?1?> 6 i9CS? 6 O 19 10? &ta3 11? a i'?51 e14? 4 7- ?17?1?IL ! a 1,r `1?p? 1 ? I6 ? : T1tgT.T? C 1Q? (1440 ZONING MAP.),2 14 LAJ _TA ?; 2(a?; 'C ?? • p 4 o ? a t p tc N r c: 69th STR EET 6= 1311. * • . ,T t!ggm .AN 5 re3?t? z (?l I???S? ! X13 12 1 1,?? c? o . ,di18 3 ,y?1117 Z 88116 14 ??t2 (2,Z)? (9)I l'8? ??I (N) I 13)I ?z ! (7) ?6?°, ??`\ T n5?13? . .? 1 (ZAP/ZS / 4 (21 (513 STREET t? 4 1;50J; ? i N 56 e ? ar4m t ? G --?-?- de? MULTIPLE RES .6' r 15` 4i t 'Z" :o SINGLE FAMILY W. Q "GEMELUS CHASAD ,,?.--- Iq l I? S ;111 q?l , s - CEMETERY ASSOCIATION" -???-?- =-1w - 7- X51 115 z 4 ,_ 99? > i > G a ' l''4 i i, x,`09 f t00 4 STREET CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager i Council Letter No. 444 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Special Use Permit at 7645 Harriet Avenue Council Members: Robert Werner has made application for a special use permit to allow one non-resident manicurist to work in the one chair beauty parlor within his home. Ms. Bev Rouen, who is licensed by the state and resides in the home, will be the principal operator of the beauty shop home occupation. The non-resident manicurist will work under the direction of Ms. Rouen. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS • 1. Section 3.28, subdivision 14 governs home occupations. 2. Section 3.28, subdivision 14 paragraph 3b allows for non- resident employees only upon granting of a special use permit. 3. Section 3.41, subdivision 5 governs the conditions for issuance of a special use permit. STAFF REVIEW There will be no alterations to the home that would be considered non-residential in nature. Any sales on the premises would be incidential to the occupation and would not be responsible for generating trips to the home. The only concern staff has is parking. There is a two car garage on the site with space in the driveway for two cars. At peak demand it is possible that five parking spaces could be necessary. Two for staff, two for customers being attended and one for a waiting customer. One or both of the staff may be able to park in the garage. One or two customers could park in the drive. But one or two customers might have to park on Harriet Avenue. The pavement of 77th Street is too narrow to permit any on-street parking. • -2- STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Assuming all regulations pertinent to home occupations are adhered to, and no parking occurs on 77th Street, staff recommends approval of the special use permit for a non-resident staff member in this home occupation. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the special use permit for one non-resident staff member in a beauty shop home occupation at 7645 Harriet Avenue, with the stipulation that if the beauty shop use ceases then the special use permit for one non-resident staff member will lapse. The commission also recommends that the staff traffic control committee consider restricting the parking on 77th Street between Harriet Avenue to Pleasant Avenue. R pectfu'ly mitted, l?G ohn G. Cart ight City Manager JGC/eja • 0 i 114 . S ~ . rtf w C/3 z m c r - Z D r n O m m > > m r= ITH r. t .. • 0- ..a .? to a.. _ 0 h .7: MihyC :7'• 7 3 a ^ ^ ^? J W L. Irk ? f. J GARFIELD . t 7 I t ? t r ? \ ?J . .. •N ? ? s / A R R I E T ? ' ? ' r1 1 t J.? ? •y 1. ? L \r ?. L. J tT • ?.1. •. d .. r J?i _. t. GRANO NnRTP4=-E__ la l an • a..+•• AVE N O z z Q Ta V AV E. ,REARR.AH, M! F. $"X Or S:11YSIT TERR j3 f _ tamp z m y Y r s • w Z W Q to ir Q S SITE PLAN 7645 HARRIET 77TH STREET 0 T?ib CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 443 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Special Use Permit Request at 400 West 78th Street Council Members: The Planning Commission at their November 27, 1984, meeting deferred action on this matter because of the need for further study of a number of issues. Because notice of the council hearing on this matter has been published for December 10, 1984 it is recommended that the council continue the hearing on this • matter until December 17, 1984. If persons are present at the December 10, 1984 meeting who wish to speak on this matter, it is recommended that the city council hold the public hearing and then continue the hearing to the December 17, 1984 city council meeting. phn tfu mitted, . Cart fight; City Manager JGC/eja 41 z4e- /5 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 442 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Special Use Permit Request at 918 West 77 1/2 Street Council Members: The Planning Commission at their November 27, 1984,meeting deferred action on this matter because of the need for further study of a number of issues. Because notice of the council hearing on this matter has been published for December 10, 1984 it is recommended that the council continue the hearing on this matter until December 17, 1984. • If persons are present at the December 10th council meeting who wish to speak on this matter, it is recommended that the council hold the public hearing and then continue the hearing to the December 17, 1984 city council meeting. R ectful y s itted, ohn G. Cart ight City Manager JGC/eja • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ?y Office of City Manager 0 Council Letter No. 441 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for a Special Use Permit at 500 East 78th Street. 0 Council Members: Northstar Pizza Corporation has requested that the city approve a special use permit to allow the construction of a drive-thru service window at the existing Shakey's Pizza Parlor restaurant at 500 East 78th Street. The zoning ordinance requires that restaurants can only be located in "I" general industrial zoning districts if a special use permit is obtained. Further, if the restaurant wishes to expand or change the nature of the business beyond that which was approved in its original special use permit and which has potential for impact on the surrounding properties or the general public welfare of the community, it must obtain another special use permit. Because the applicant is adding a drive- thru service window which was not included in the original special use permit, and because they wish to use a portion of the public right-of-way, a new special use permit is necessary. PROPOSAL The proposal involves the construction of a drive up service window on the west wall of the existing restaurant. Access to the service window would be via a drive up lane which is accessed from 5th Avenue north of the existing building. Because of the location of the structure a portion of this drive up lane would be on the unimproved right-of-way of 5th Avenue. An existing curb cut will be removed adjacent to the northwest corner of the building. Concrete bumper curbs will be used to define the drive up lane. The boulevard area not utilized for the drive up lane adjacent to the building will be landscaped. The existing parking area will be restriped to provide additional parking spaces. 0 -2- ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Section 3.33, subdivision 2 and Section 3.34, subdivision 1 requires that restaurants can only be located in industrial zoning districts if a special use permit is obtained. 2. Section 3.33, subdivision 4 lists regulations for restaurants. 3. Section 3.41, subdivision 5 lists conditions governing the issuance of special use permits. STAFF REVIEW 1. The existing restaurant facility are consistent with the site by the comprehensive plan,. and the proposed drive up types of uses suggested for the 2. The proposed construction of the drive up window would not create traffic hazards on adjacent streets. There will be sufficient car stacking space available on the site to handle proposed volume of traffic through the drive up facility. 3. The restaurant will continue to meet ordinance requirements for restaurants, including provision of sufficient number of off-street parking spaces. • 4. The one area where the staff does have some concern is the use of the public right-of-way for the drive up lane for the drive up window. First of all, staff is concerned about the precedent that this might set concerning use of unimproved boulevard areas along streets by adjacent property owners. Boulevard areas are typically used for sidewalks, for green areas and for snow storage space. They also allow for future street widening and other improvements that may be necessary. However, it should be noted that the city is recommending the use of the unimproved boulevard area on 65th Street to permit Market Plaza developers to provide for a delivery truck unloading zone. In this particular case, the right-of-way area is now blacktop and does not serve as a green area and and there are no sidewalks in the area in question. If the special use permit is granted, it should be stipulated that the property owner enter into a hold harmless type agreement with the city. This agreement would allow the property owner to use the boulevard as proposed, but the city would be held harmless from any damages suffered in the area in question and the city would have the right to use the right-of- way for any public purpose in the future if it was necessary. At such time the property owner would agree that any improvements that were constructed in the right-of-way would be • removed at no cost to the city. -3- The second area concerning the use of the right-of-way which staff has some concern about is the issue of snow storage. The use of the right-of-way for the drive up lane reduces the area available for storage of the snow plowed off of 5th Avenue. This is especially acute adjacent to the northwest corner of the building where the drive up lane is virtually right up to the street. It is also a problem in the area adjacent to the drive up window proposed for landscaping. If the special use permit is granted it should be stipulated that the property owner would be responsible for hauling snow away from the drive up lane rather than plowing it back out on the street. The applicant would also have to understand that there would be snow plowed into the landscaped area and the city will not be liable for any damages to the landscaping materials planted in that area dueo the snow plowed into the area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the special use permit for the drive up service window be granted with the following stipulations: 1. That the applicant enter into a hold harmless agreement with the city concerning the use of the unimproved right-of-way on the east side of 5th Avenue for landscaping and for a drive up lane. • 2. That the applicant be responsible for hauling snow away from the drive up lane and that the snow not be plowed into 5th Avenue. 3. That bollards not be installed as shown on the attached site plan and that the design of the curb cut closing should be approved by staff. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission on a 5-1-1 vote recommended approval of the special use permit request with the three stipulations recommended by city staff. CITY MANAGER RECOMMENDATION: The City Manager recommends that consideration be given to require the erection of a three-foot high retaining wall along the exterior side of the drive-up vehicle lane in order to improve safety of vehicles traveling on 5th Avenue (or pedestrians walking in the street) by having a more pronounced barrier to separate vehicles from 5th Avenue traffic. pectfuJ,Yy'su icltted, L John G. Cartw ght j City Manager / I - l • j? j - axi5ITPJ* cjr+.'V, a?? ?t-?ev? cor1?.. uJP+? *i ,i 1 i I ml 1 I 1 I _41 p I I I • V , ' 1 7 ,'FoJ f?TH\ y .\ 7--S r 7? 71' 'y ?\.\I L.'F U OAKLAND 129 i 25 21 115 II 1 ? iO 1Q ,C 'C Iny E GENERAL GENERAL n MULTIPLE 76441 JA I ?2?: • a_ t 4 IQ' 1`nl I INAMI Ia i,,.-_ZONIN G MA.? s - ?.\-- r ---? - -, r .- s --- F Lr? 77545 39 O C Cf I U O C 'Sa4 I 3E /}?05 I'6U1 7540 39 7 _ C INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENCE L??IiH E Iz Q I? 1l? \ `1 If I ' I ? I? I?t • .I 21 I IS 09 7605 7545 39 O i D ?- } O C C8-I0 D - 1 - I ? I - N ?. LI v 2 -14 LAND USE MAP y Q ?\ \ N u l 'OTC \f bu ?Tk 177 \ ? I ? t Q 1 Qf? to ? ?- ?y T N ( 01 (J? :1 - as 2ti-.L ?a `??a I 7SS? 76 OAKLAND -I 7q,tiS !5 24 i 25 cl IS I1?00 i76J1 754p S9 \JI, E GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL r. MULTIPLE RESIDENCE s 1 76s.1 3• 2 :4 1 . 10 Os 17Q? •.+.. I • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 440 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application For On-sale Wine And Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License For Northstar Pizza, Inc. d/b/a Shakey's Pizza Parlor Council Members: On October 30, 1984, the renewal application and required documents were submitted to the City of Richfield for the on- sale wine license for Shakey's Pizza Parlor. In addition, the 1985 license fee of $590 for the on-sale wine and $358 for the non-intoxicating malt liquor license was paid. • The Department of Public Safety has conducted the necessary background investigation and has found the corporate structure of Northstar Pizza, Inc., changed to reflect Mr. Richard M. Lupu as sole interest holder of the corporation. Mr. Lupu now controls 100% of the corporation and serves as President. His wife, Jerilyn Lupu, serves as Vice-President. Mr. Herbert Stone and Mr. Milton Sethre, officers of the organization last year are no longer associated with Northstar Pizza, Inc. Their interests have been bought out by Mr. Lupu. Mr. Lupu serves as the on-site Manager of the business. Richard and Jerilyn Lupu have no known criminal records. The investigation has determined that all 1984 real estate and state withholding and sales taxes have been paid and are current. The building and property continue to be owned by the A.J. Bogen Company of Minneapolis. The lease agreement between the applicant and the property owner continues to be in effect with all payments current. The required $5,000 Surety Bond has been submitted and indicates that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company of St. Paul is carrying the bond. A certificate of insurance detailing public and liquor liability coverages has also been submitted and lists the National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., as affording the required coverages. Mr. Paul F. Jaffe, a Certified Public Accountant, has again this year provided the city with the required accountant's statement covering the 12 month period ending September 30, 1984 as follows: Total sales for the period are $938,202. Of this total amount, 85% or $794,859, account for food sales, while 15% or $143,343 account for beverage sales. -2- • 40 From November 1984 to November 1985, there were 17 reported Public Safety contacts. This represents an increase of 4 contacts from the 12 month period last year. However, due to the change in wine license renewal dates from March 31st to December 31st, 8 of these 17 contacts were included in last years renewal investigation. Of these 17 contacts, 10 have been classified as criminal in nature. This represents an increase of 5 criminal contacts over the last reporting period. Not any of these contacts were of a serious criminal category. The remaining contacts involved licensing, inspections and various assists. The increase in criminal contacts does not appear to be a significant concern for the Public Safety Department. It would appear that there is no basis for denial of this request for renewal of their on-sale wine license. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Director of Public Safety, in which I concur, that council members give favorable consideration to the request submitted by Northstar Pizza, Inc., d/b/a Shakey's Pizza, Parlor, for the renewal of their on-sale wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor licenses for 1985• The applicant has been notified that a representative of the corporation must be present at the public hearing December 10, 1984. Re ectfull s/U "itted , ii Li-dhn G. C rt ght City Manager JGC/eja 0 ? i;2..o • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 439 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application for On-sale Wine and Non- Intoxicating Malt Liquor License/ Miller's Fireside Pizza, Inc. Council Members: On October 30, 1984, the renewal application and required documents were submitted to the City of Richfield for the wine license renewal for Miller's Fireside Pizza. In addition, the 1985 on-sale wine license fee of $590 and the non-intoxicating malt liquor license fee of $358 were also submitted. The Department of Public Safety has conducted the necessary background investigation and determined the corporate structure of Miller's Fireside Pizza has remained unchanged. Mr. David J. Miller remains Corporate President and Treasurer, while his mother, Lucille Miller, serves as Corporate Vice-President and Secretary. David Miller also serves as the on-premises Manager. Neither David Miller nor Lucille Miller have any known criminal record. The investigation has determined that all 1984 real estate and state withholding and sales taxes have been paid and are current. The building and property continues to be owned by the Millers. The required $5,000 Surety Bond has been submitted and indicates that Wausau Insurance Companies of Wausau, Wisconsin is carrying the bond. A certificate of insurance detailing public and liquor liability coverages was also submitted and the Wausau Insurance Companies affords the required coverages. The accounting firm of George M. Hansen. Company, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota has prepared a statement detailing sales percentages for the period 10/1/83 to 9/30/84. The breakdown indicates that food sales accounted for 92.8% of the total sales during this period while beer and wine sales amounted to 7.17% of the total sales. During the past 12 month period there were 5 public safety contacts with Miller's Pizza, as opposed to 7 contacts during -2- the last period. Of these 5 contacts, 4 were for licensing or inspection purposes and one was criminal in nature. This year, as was the case last year, Miller's Fireside Pizza should be commended for their ability to conduct a business that projects such a positive image in the community. Since there appears to be no basis for denial of this renewal license application, it is the recommendation of the Director of Public Safety, in which I concur, that members of the city council give favorable consideration to the approval of the renewal application for an on-sale wine and non-intoxicating liquor license for Millers Fireside Pizza, Inc., for 1985. License applicant has been notified of the required representation at the public hearing scheduled for December 10, 1984. R ectfuX1 y; )s itted , Z Gli Lew hn G. Cartw fight City Manager / JGC/eja 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 438 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application Of On-sale Wine License Prest Motor Inn, Inc. (d/b/a The Inn) Request For Continuance Of Hearing Council Members: In early October 1984, an informational packet, license remewal forms and instructions related to the license renewal process were mailed to Mr. John Prest Jr. The Public Safety Department requested that the completed license renewal application be submitted by October 31, 1984. The time frame established was related to the necessary investigative work . required by the Department of Public Safety in order to prepare reports and recommendations for council consideration prior to the close of the current licensing year. This year, as in past years, the Public Safety Department has experienced a great deal of difficulty in obtaining all of the required information in a timely manner from this particular applicant. After repeated efforts by the Public Safety Department to obtain all of the documents and information needed as a part of our renewal process, the requested information was finally provided to the city on Wednesday, December 5, 1984. It is the request of the Public Safety Department that the hearing be continued to the regularly scheduled council meeting of January 14, 1985. This continuance will enable the Public Safety Department time to complete their investigative process and prepare the necessary report and recommendation for council consideration in this matter. R ectful?s fitted, ti bhon n G. Car Wright,' • City Manager j JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ?D Office of City Manager • Council Letter No. 437 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application For On-sale Liquor And Sunday Liquor Licenses For Ground Round Restaurant Council Members: On October 31, 1984, the renewal application and required documents were submitted to the city for the on-sale liquor and Sunday liquor licenses for the Ground Round Restaurant. In addition, the 1985 on-sale and Sunday liquor license fee of $10,123 was paid. The Department of Public Safety has conducted the necessary background investigation and has found the parent corporation of the Ground Round Restaurant to be the Howard Johnson Company of North Quincy, Massachusettes. During the past year, the corporate structure was changed to reflect the replacement of two corporate officers. The present structure continues to show Mr. G. Michael Hostage as President and Mr. Edgar L. Andlauer as Treasurer. These two people hold the same positions as they did last year. Mr. Clifford R. Kaeser is the new Vice- President and Mr. Vivan E. Burks, the new Secretary. All of these persons currently reside in North Quincy, Massachusetts and none of them have any known criminal records. The A. J. Bogen Company owns the building at 2500 E. 78th Street and leases it to the Ground Round Restaurant. This arrangement is the same as last year. Current real estate taxes amounting to $31,428.72 have been paid as of October 10, 1984, by the A. J. Bogen Company. These taxes reflect a market value of the building and property of $650,000. All state sales and withholding taxes have been paid for the previous year. Federal tax information is unavailable due to data privacy laws. The required on-sale intoxicating liquor bond has been filed with the city and this bond indicates that again this year the Reliance Insurance Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is affording the required $10,000 Surety Bond. The bond remains in effect until December 31, 1985. The certificate of insurance U -2- detailing public and liquor liability has been submitted by the American Mutual Insurance Company of Wakefield, Massachusettes. This policy names the City of Richfield as additionally insured and appears to meet ordinance code requirements as they pertain to required general and liquor liability insurance. The required accountant's statement was prepared and submitted to the city by the internal auditing department of Howard Johnson Company. Breakdown of this statement shows total sales in the amount of $1,881,552. Of this amount, 58.8% or $1,107,011 represents food sales while 39.6% or $745,825 beverage sales. Non-food/non beverage sales which represents the sale of cigarettes and proceeds from the video games contained in the restaurant amount to 01.6% or $28,716 of the total sales amount. Mr. Trent L. Trahan continues to be the Manager of the Ground Round Restaurant and investigation reveals that he has no known criminal history. All contacts made with Mr. Trahan by the Public Safety Department have been positive in nature. He appears to take a sincere interest in projecting a positive public image for his establishment and is very cooperative. Between November 1, 1983 and October 31, 1984, there were a total of 42 contacts with the Ground Round Restaurant. This compares with 39 contacts for the previous year, or an increase of 7%. The breakdown of these contacts are as follows: 1983 1984 • TOTAL CONTACTS: 39 42 CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 15 16 "bar type"(included) 6 7 NON-CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 24 26 Parking/Traffic 8 9 Medical Emergency 2 1 Public Assists 9 13 Misc. (non-crim.) 1 1 Inspections/licensing 2 2 Fires 2 0 The level of police contact with the Ground Round Restaurant remains about at the same level as last year when a substantial decrease in Public Safety contacts occurred. The Ground Round Restaurant and the parent company, Howard Johnson Company, were again this year very cooperative in submitting all necessary information and applications for the renewal of their licenses. Based upon the background investigation there appears to be no reason for denial of the requested renewal of the on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses for -3- 1985. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Director of Public Safety, in which I concur, that the city council give • favorable consideration to the approval of the renewal of the on- sale and Sunday liquor licenses for 1985 for the Ground Round Restaurant. The applicants were notified of the required representation at the public hearing scheduled for December 10, 1984. R p?Pmitted, r ohn G. ar wright; City Manager JGC/eja 11 is #9 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 436 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application For On-sale Wine And Non-intoxicating Malt Liquor License/ Davanni's Inc. Council Members: On October 29, 1984, the renewal application and required documents were submitted to the City of Richfield for the on-sale wine license for Davanni's Inc. In addition, the 1985 on-sale wine license fee of $590, and the non-intoxicating malt liquor license fee of $358 were paid. • The corporate structure of the organization remains the same as last year with the exception of Mr. Patrick J. Woodring who no longer is with the corporation. Mr. Gladstone M. Stenson serves as President; Mr. Roger W. Schelper, Vice-President; and, Mr. Robert W. Carlson, Jr., Treasurer. The position of Secretary, vacated by Mr. Woodring, remains unfilled. None of these individuals have any known criminal record. Articles of Merger and a revised Certificate of Incorporation were submitted along with the required documents showing the official name change of the corporation to Davanni's, Inc. This change became effective October 1, 1984. Mr. Edward R. Johnson of St. Paul continues to be the Manager of the Richfield establishment. Mr. Johnson has no known criminal record. The investigation determined that all 1984 real estate and state withholding and sales taxes have been paid and are current. The building and property continue to be owned by the Highway 52 Embers, Inc. The lease agreement between the applicant and the property owner continues to be in effect with all payments current. The required $5,000 dollar Surety Bond has been submitted and indicates that Transamerica Insurance Company of California is carrying the bond. A certificate of insurance detailing public and liquor liability coverages was also submitted and lists the Security Insurance Group through • the Marsh and McLennan Agency of Minneapolis as affording the required coverages. -2- Mr. Robert E. Stupka, Certified Public Accountant, has again this year provided the city with the required accountant's statement. A breakdown of the 12 month period ending September 30, 1984 is as follows: Total sales in the amount of $522,547, of which 89.6% or $468,202 was total food sales and 10.4% or $54,345 was total beverage sales. From November 1983 to November 1984, there was only 1 Public Safety contact with Davanni's. That contact involved the licensing inspection of last year's wine license renewal. Davanni's should be commended for this outstanding effort to control the behavior of their customers and thus project a positive public image in the community., Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation conducted, there appears to be no.basis for denial of this on-sale wine license application renewal. Therefore, it is the reommendation of the Public Safety Director, in which I concur, that members of the city council give favorable consideration to the approval of this on-sale wine and non- intoxicating malt liquor license for 1985• The applicant has been notified of the required representation at the public . hearing on December 10, 1984. Re ectfu s itted, hn G. Cart ight City Manager JGC/eja is CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA v Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 435 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application Of On-sale And Sunday 'Liquor Licenses For Chi-Chi's Restaurant Council Members: On November 1, 1984, the renewal application and required documents were submitted to the City of Richfield for the on- sale liquor and Sunday liquor licenses for Chi-Chi's Restaurant. In addition, the 1985 on-sale liquor and Sunday liquor license fees of $10,123 have been paid to the city. The parent corporation of Chi-Chi's Restaurant is the Consul Restaurant Corporation of Minneapolis, Minnesota. During the past year, the corporate name of the organization was changed from Consul Corporation to the Consul Restaurant Corporation. A certificate of Amendment of Articles was included in the documents submitted to the city showing this minor change. The corporate officer structure of the organization remains the same as last year and is as follows: Mr. James H. Crivits, President; Mr. Theodore J. O'Shaughnessey, Vice-President; Mr. William C. Kuhlman, Secretary and Mr. John M. Hamburger, Treasurer. The Department of Public Safety has conducted the necessary background investigation and finds no known criminal history on any of these individuals. The Marno-Max Company owns the building located at 7717 Nicollet Avenue, and leases it to the Consul Corporation. The current real estate taxes in the amount of $73,647 have been paid as of October 11, 1984, by the Marro-Max Company. These taxes reflect a market value of the building and property of $1,535,000. All state sales and withholding taxes are current and have been paid for the previous year. Federal tax information is unavailable due to data privacy laws. The required accountant's statement was prepared and submitted by the Internal Auditing Department of Consul Corporation. Mr. John Hamburger, a Certified Public Accountant with the company, submitted the figures for the twelve month period, October 1, 1983 to September 30, 1984. The breakdown of this statement shows total sales in the amount of $4,306,639• Of the total sales, $2,471,667, or 57.4%, is related to the sale of food. Beverage sales amounted to $1,834,972, or 42.6% of the total sales. -2- The required on-sale intoxicating liquor bond has been filed with the city and this bond is carried by the American Insurance Company of Schaumburg, Illinois. This Surety Bond is in effect until December 31, 1985. The certificate of insurance detailing public and liquor liability has been submitted by the H. & H. Insurance Services of Brookfield, Wisconsin and lists the Standard Fire Insurance Company as affording the coverages. This policy names the City of Richfield as additionally insured and appears to meet ordinance code requirements as they pertain to required general and liquor liability insurance. Mr. Lee C. Bushman is the on-site Manager of Chi-Chi's Restaurant and the background investigation conducted by the Richfield Department of Public Safety reveals no known criminal history. All contacts made with Mr. Bushman by the Public Safety Department have been positive in nature. He appears to take a sincere interest in projecting a positive public image for this restaurant establishment and has been very cooperative. Mr. Bushman has a very impressive background in restaurant management and assumed the position of Manager of Chi- Chi's on May 1, 1984. Between November 1, 1983 and October 31, 19814, there were a total of 101 police contacts by the Department of Public Safety with Chi-Chi's Restaurant. This compares with 64 contacts for the previous year, or an increase of 58%. The breakdown of these contacts if as follows: 0 1983 1984 TOTAL CONTACTS: 64 101 CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 8 27 "Bar Type" 2 6 (included in criminal contacts) NON-CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 56 74 Parking/Traffic 5 14 Medical Emergency 8 7 Public Assists 33 45 Misc. (non-crim.) 3 1 Inspections/Licensing 5 6 Fires 2 1 The level of police contact with Chi-Chi's Restaurant has increased substantially over last year when a substantial decrease occurred. The area of general criminal contacts seemed to be concentrated in the parking lot area with auto breakins and stolen auto's reported. The parking lot also accounted for a large number of public assists which were almost exclusively automobile "lockouts". The Public Safety Department will work with the management of Chi-Chi's to determine ways to reduce . service calls. -3- Based upon the investigation conducted by the Department of Public Safety there appears to be no reason for denying the • requested license licenses for 1985 the recommendation concur, that the c the approval of th notified of the ne license hearing. renewal of the on-sale and for Chi-Chi's Restaurant. of the Director of Public ity council give favorable e licenses requested. The cessity for representation Sunday liquor Therefore, it is Safety, in which I consideration to applicant has been at the scheduled R ectful y su tted, r ohn G. artw ight City Manager JGC/eja 0 • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ;t;e , Office of City Manager 0 Council Letter No. 434 Agenda: December 10, 1984 • The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application Liquor Licenses For Fred Babcock V.F.W. Of On-sale Liquor And Sunday Post #5555 Council Members: On November 1, 1984, the renewal application and required documents were submitted to the city for the on-sale liquor and Sunday liquor licenses for the Fred Backcock V.F.W. Post #5555. In addition, the 1985 license fees for veteran's organizations were paid in the amount of $668. In view of the fact that there is only one new officer, in addition to the applicant's new Operations Manager, involved in this years license renewal process; and in view of the fact that the applicant has cooperated completely with the public safety investigation by providing complete, concise and timely information; it is the recommendation of the Public Safety Director that $200 of the $358 license investigative fee be waived in accordance with the amended provisions of our liquor licensing code related to fraternal, veterans and charitable organizations. The Department of Public Safety has conducted the necessary background investigation and find the officers as follows: Mr. Frank L. Baker, Commander; Mr. Richard G. Steinert, Vice- Commander; Mr. James W. Robbins, Secretary; and, Mr. Robert M. Fritzke, Treasurer. The officers have remained the same as were on the Board last year with the exception of Mr. James Robbins who is new this year. There is no known criminal record on any of these individuals. All officers are residents of Richfield except for Mr. Robbins who resides in Bloomington. Financial information has been prepared and submitted to the city by Certified Public Accountant, Roy H. LaFayette. This report indicates the following: Total sales amounted to $803,852. Of this total sales amount, $394,295 or 49% is food, while $395,787 or 49% is bar sales; $2,862 or .7% relates to confectionary sales and $10,908 or 1.3% is the sale of soft drinks. 0 -2- The required on-sale intoxicating liquor bond has been filed with the city and this bond indicates that again this year the United Fire & Casualty Company of Cedar Rapids, Iowa is affording the required $10,000 Surety Bond. The bond remains in effect until December 31, 1985. The certificate of insurance detailing public and liquor liability has been submitted by the Ken Jarcho Agency of Bloomington, Minnesota. This agency has arranged the required insurance coverages to be supplied by the Great Southwest Fire Insurance Company and Columbia Casualty Company. This policy names the City of Richfield as additionally insured and appears to meet ordinance code requirements as they pertain to liquor liability insurance and are also in effect until December 31, 1985. Current real estate taxes amounting to $27,245 have been paid as of October 13, 1984, by the Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post. These taxes reflect a market value of the building and property in the amount of $567,700. All state sales and withholding taxes have been paid for the previous year. Federal tax information is unavailable due to the data privacy laws. In April 1984, Mr. Ken Orvis was replaced by Mr. Roy J. Hitchcock as Operations Manager of the V.F.W. Club. A background investigation has been completed on Mr. Hitchcock and he has no known criminal history. All contacts made with Mr. Hitchcock by the Public Safety Department have been very positive in nature. He appears to take a sincere interest in projecting a positive public image for the V.F.W. establishment and-is very cooperative. Mr. Hitchcock has ample experience in managing liquor establishments and there is nothing in his background investigation that would preclude the issuance of his license as Manager of the organization for 1985. Between November 1, 1983 and October 31, 1984, there were a total of 25 police contacts with the V.F.W. Club. This figure compares with 25 contacts for the previous year. The breakdown of contacts is as follows: 1983 1984 TOTAL CONTACTS: 25 25 CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 07 10 "bar-type" -0- 03 (included in criminal contacts) NON-CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 18 15 Parking/Traffic 03 02 Medical Emergency 05 04 Public Assists 06 05 Inspectins/Licensing 03 04 Fires 01 -0- The level of police contact remains at about the same level as last year when a substantial decrease in Public Safety contacts occurred. -3- Based upon the background investigation information there would appear to be no reason for denying the requested renewal of the on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses for 1985 for the Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post #5555• Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Director of Public Safety, in which I concur, that the city council give favorable consideration to the renewal of the on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses requested. The applicant has been notified of the necessity for representation at the scheduled license hearing. pectf 1 mitted, ohn G.?Car right. City Manager i JGC/eja c: CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager • Council Letter No. 433 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Renewal Application of On-sale Liquor And Sunday Liquor And Tavern Licenses For Richfield American Legion Post #435 Council Members: On November 13, 1984, the renewal applications and required documents were submitted to the City of Richfield for the on- sale liquor, Sunday liquor, and tavern licenses for the Richfield American Legion Post #435. In addition, the 1985 license fees set for organizations was submitted to the city in the amount of $668. In view of the fact that there is only one new officer involved in this years license renewal process; and in view of the fact that the applicant has cooperated completely with the public safety investigation by providing complete, concise and timely information; it is the recommendation of the Public Safety Director that $225 of the $358 license investigative fee be waived in accordance with the amended provisions of our liquor licensing code related to fraternal, veterans and charitable organizations. The Public Safety Department has conducted the necessary background investigation and find the American Legion Post #435 officers to be as follows: Mr. Joseph D. Kennedy, Commander; Mr. Fred D. Primoli, Club Manager; Mr. Theodore J. Stage, Adjutant; Mr. James M. Daly, Finance Officer. Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Stage have remained on the Board from last year and Mr. Primoli is still the on-site liquor manager. New member to the Board is Mr. James Daly who took over the duties of Finance Officer from Mr. Donald Vogtman. There is no known criminal history on any of these four individuals. The required financial statement was submitted to the city by the Certified Public Accounting firm of Mark Babcock and Company. This report reflects total sales from the period July 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984, in the amount of $1,500,750. Of this total amount, $791,670, or 53% relates to food sales, while $709,080, or 47% reflects liquor sales. 0 -2- The required on-sale intoxicating liquor bond has been filed with the city and this bond indicates that again this year, the • TransAmerica Insurance Company of Los Angeles, California is affording the required $10,000 Surety Bond. The bond remains in effect until December 31, 1985. The certificate of insurance detailing public and liquor liability has been submitted by the Norwest Insurance Agency of Minneapolis, Minnesota. This agency has arranged the required insurance coverage to be supplied by the INA Insurance Company. The policies are in effect until November 1, 1985. Mr. Primoli was requested to furnish the city with a revised certificate of insurance indicating a policy extension to December 31, 1985. The policies also list the City of Richfield as additionally insured, and meet city ordinance code requirements. Current real estate taxes amounting to $38,478. have been paid as of October 16, 1984, by the American Legion Post #435. These taxes reflect a market value of the building and property of $811,100. All state sales and withholding taxes have been paid for the previous year and federal tax information is unavailable due to data privacy laws. Mr. Fred D. Primoli, Operations Manager of the Richfield American Legion, has been very cooperative with the Public Safety Department and all contacts have been very positive in nature. He appears to take a sincere interest in projecting a positive public image for the establishment and there is nothing • in the investigation that would preclude the issuance of his license as Manager of the American Legion organization for 1985• Between November 1, 1983 and October 31, 1984 there were a total of 60 police contacts with the American Legion Club. This compares with 59 contacts for the previous year. The breakdown of these contacts are as follows: 1983 1984 TOTAL CONTACTS: 59 60 CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 36 30 "Bar Type" 10 7 (included in criminal contacts) Burglar Alarms 15 17 (included in criminal contacts) NON-CRIMINAL CONTACTS: 23 30 Parking/Traffic 3 2 Medical Emergency 5 4 Public Assists 6 5 Inspections/Licensing 3 4 Fires 1 0 The level of police contacts with the American Legion. Club remains at about the same level as last year. -3- Based upon the background investigation there appears to be no reason for denying the requested renewal of the on-sale liquor, Sunday liquor and tavern licenses requested by the Richfield American Legion Post #455 for 1985. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the Director of Public Safety, in which I concur, that the city council give favorable consideration to the approval of the licenses herein requested. The applicant has been notified of the necessity of having representation at the scheduled license hearing. Respectfully ?abmitted, John G. ;Ca twrigh City Manager JGC/eja i 0 ;0.s,r • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 432 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Agreement for Counseling Services With Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. for 1985 Council Members: There is an item on the December 10, 1984 City Council agenda providing for council approval of an agreement for counseling services with The Storefront/Youth-Action, Inc. for the year 1985. The City Council approved an appropiation of $38,600 for The Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. for 1985. In 1984, the city appropriated $36,400 for these services, and $30,300 was spent in 1983. The attached contractual agreement summarizes the services to be provided. The services are the same as those which have been previously contracted for by the city. It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed agreement, and authorize its execution by the City Manager. ,pectfu y ubmitted, ohn G. Car right City Manager JGC/eja . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 431 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Approval of Contract for Services With Project Charlie III Council Members: Project Charlie III is a volunteer"organization in the City of Richfield that seeks to prevent chemical dependency through education. This group of volunteers works mainly with elementary students in an effort to educate them about drug abuse before the problem ever starts. • For the past several years, the City Council has supported the activities of this organization through an annual appropriation of $3,160. This amount was also approved in the 1985 budget document. Attached to this council letter is a copy of a contract with Project Charlie III for crime prevention services in the amount of $3,160. It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement and authorize its execution by the City Manager. pectfU ly s mitted, City JGC/eja w John G. Car wrig ty Manager % Is 4-t sD . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 430 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Award.of Contract - Seasonal Recreation Brochure Council Members: On November 28, 1984, in accordance with legal requirements, bids were opened for four 1985 seasonal recreation brochures. Twenty sets of specifications were distributed. Three bids were received. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for council review. An appropriation for this work is in the 1985 Community Services Department administration division operating budget. Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter recreation brochures are distributed to each residence in the city. With the exception of the Summer brochure, the school district participates in the brochures by including recreational programs offered by their Community Education Department and sharing a proportional cost of the publications. 1984 was the first year all four publications were on a contract of a this nature. Sexton Printing was the 1984 vendor and proved to be most reliable. The 1984 contract was in the amount of $23,954. However, the total copies will increase in 1985 from 17,500 to 18,000; and the ink screening process is included in the total contract price for 1985, whereas in 1984 this cost was extra. It is recommended the city council accept the bid minutes and authorize the award of contract for 1985 seasonal recreation brochures to Sexton Printing in the amount of $24,400. Respectfully/ s4)zmitted, V J'vvl-?"-l/, v-vv?v 6hn G. Cart right ity Manager I 0 JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD BID OPENING NOVEMBER 28, 1984 Seasonal Community Recreation Brochure Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for the printing of the Seasonal Community Recreation Brochure, as advertised in the official newspaper on November 7, 1984. Present: Don Fondrick, Community Services Director Steve Devich, Acting Administrative Services Director Mary Ruhme, Recreation Staff Member Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: VENDOR BOND PROPOSAL Sexton Printing $1,220.00 St. Paul Cashier Check $24,400 Wallace W. Carlson $1,326.45 Minneapolis Cashier Check $26,529.17 Bolger Publications $1,274.24 Minneapolis Cashier Check $25,484.80 The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the December 10, 1984 City Council Meeting. Sylvia K. Bergh City Clerk 0 _-?_ S? i CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 429 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Purchase in excess of $5,000 Council Members: The city council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, the authority to purchase shall be submitted to the city council for consider- ation. There are two such items on the December 10 agenda. FERTILIZER Hennepin County, under a mutual agreement with several other municipalities, including the city of Richfield, solicited bids for fertilizer under a 1985 contract. As has been the case in the last few years, to take advantage of discount prices, Richfield places an order in late 1984 for 1985 delivery and payment. Although the 1985 contract calls for orders to be placed prior to December 10, 1984 to obtain a ten percent (10%) discount, the vendor has agreed that Richfield may submit its order on December 11, following city council authorization, and still receive the 10% discount. To meet the 1985 fertilizer needs of the golf course, it is recommended the city council authorize the purchase of 17 ton PAR EX 24-4-12 at $700/ton and 2 ton of PAR EX 21 at $840/ton, less the 10% discount, for a total purchase price of $12,222 from Turf Supply. Adequate funds for this item are included in the 1985 Golf Course Budget. PUBLIC SAFETY VEHICLES The adopted 1985 operating budget for the central garage division includes $12,250 per unit for replacement of public safety squad cars. Hennepin County recently received bids for such vehicles. The bids have been reviewed by the public safety . staff and the central garage staff. To take advantage of the bid prices, orders must be placed by mid-December, 1984. -2- It is recommended the city council authorize the purchase of four 1985 Ford Crown Victoria vehicles at a unit price of $11,523 for a total purchase price of $46,092 from Elk River Ford-Mercury, Inc. Additional public safety vehicles included in the 1985 adopted budget remain to be purchased. R.?Apectfuylly )Orbmitted, d'ohn G. Cartwright City Manager JGC/eja 1 0 -ccsB • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 428 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Letter of Commendation from Senior Citizens/ Handicapped Commission Council Members: Myrna Hammer, Chairperson of the Richfield Senior Citizens/Hndicapped Commission, has written a letter expressing her appreciation to Lil Hipp, Community Center Manager, and Sylvia Bergh, City Clerk, who were the city staff persons that worked with the Senior Citizens/Handicapped Commission program "Access to Vote 184". A copy of the letter is attached to this council letter for the information of the city council. R ectfully,. mitted, i hn G. Cartwrigh City Manager JGC/eja 0 0 November 27, 1984 John Cartwright, City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423-2598 Dear Mr. Cartwright: The Senior Citizen/Handicap Commission would like to commend two City staff members who worked with the Commission on the "Access to Vote 84" pilot project, they are Sylvia Bergh and Lil Hipp. When the Commission first met with City staff to discuss the problem seniors and disabled were having at the voting polls, Sylvia was concerned and expressed an interest in working to solve the problems. Her openness to new ideas and her progressive involvement greatly contributed to this pilot project becoming a reality. Lil Hipp who serves on the Commission as a liason from City staff, worked diligently on this project in the coordination and communication between the City and the volunteers for the project. With this pilot project Richfield has demonstrated how a City and community volunteers working together can assist it's elderly and disabled citizens enabling them to exercise their right to vote at a polling site. The Commission is appreciative of Sylvia Bergh and Lil Hipp for their cooperative efforts on this pilot project. Richfield can be proud to have these dedicated staff persons representing the City. Sincerely, My a G. Hammer, Chairperson Senior Citizen/Handicapped MGH:em cc: Mayor John Hamilton Don Fondrick • SSA CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 427 Agenda: December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Establishment Of "Special No Parking Zone" Council Members: The City Manager has been informed by Mayor John Hamilton and Council Member Priebe of a request by the resident of 7645 Oakland Avenue for the establishment of a "Special No Parking Zone" in front of the residential property herein noted for handicapped parking privileges. It is the City Manager's understanding that the resident of the property herein indicated is a single, elderly blind person. Under the provisions of Richfield City Ordinance Code 9.03, Subd. 1 (22), the requested "special no parking zone" may be established. It appears that the resident involved in this request qualifies for this consideration. It is recommended that the council honor this request and authorize the City Manager to order the proper posting for one parking space directly in front of 7645 Oakland Avenue in accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Richfield City Ordinance Code. Re pectfuJ,Xy s mitted, ohn G. Car right City Manager i, JGC/eja 0 Subd. 16. Maintenance and Repairs. No person shall was, grease, repair or otherwise perform maintenance work upon any vehicle when such vehicle is located on any street or highway. This section does not apply to repair situations wherein an actual emergency exists. CROSS-REFERENCE: See Chap. VI, Sec. 6.04, for provisions relating to automobile washing establishments. Subd. 17. Tampering With Parked Vehicles. No person shall tamper with, molest, damage or set in motion any vehicle standing on any street or highway without the consent of the owner or driver of such vehicle. Provided, however, that when the City Manager or his representative finds it necessary, for purposes of facilitating street maintenance operations, to move any such vehicle, he may do so to the extent necessary to facilitate such operations. (Bill 1982-27) 8/9/82 9.03. SPECIFIC REGULATIONS - ILLEGAL PARKING AND STOPPING. Subdivision 1. Illegal Parking or Stooping. No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle, whether attended or unattended except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device in any of the following places: (1) On a sidewalk or boulevard between sidewalk and roadway. (2) In front of a public or private driveway or alley or within five feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway. (3) Within an intersection. (4) Within ten feet of a fire hydrant; provided that this does not prevent the parking of taxicabs in taxicab stands-established by the council within ten feet in either direction of a fire hydrant. (5) On a crosswalk. (6) Within 20 feet of a crosswalk at any intersection. (7) Within 30 feet upon the approach of any flashing school signal, stop sign, traffic-control signal or school sign at the side of a roadway. (8) Between a safety zone and the adjacent curb or within 30 feet of points on the curb immediately opposite the ends of a safety zone, unless a different length is indicated by signs or markings. (9) Within a designated or marked bus stop. (10) Within 50 feet of the nearest rail of a railroad crossing. (11) Within 20 feet of the driveway entrance to any fire station and on the side of a street opposite the entrance of any fire station within 75 feet of said entrance when properly sign posted. (12) Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when such stopping, standing or parking would obstruct traffic. (13) Along the curb side of street adjacent to any school property from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM on days when school is in session. (14) On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a street. (15) Upon any bridge or approach or other elevated structure upon a street or highway or within a street or highway tunnel, except otherwise provided by ordinance. (16) At any place so as to block a fire escape or exit from any building. (17) At any place where temporary signs prohibit parking as long as such signs are in place. 8/9/82 ORDINANCE CODE 250 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . (18) On any public street or highway, at the same location, for more than 48 hours in succession. (19) On any public property, including parks, playgrounds and school grounds and including marked and improved parking areas on public property during times when parking in such parking areas is either prohibited or is otherwise limited by Council resolution and such prohibition or limitation is conspicuously posted in the parking area. (Bill 1979-23) 12/27/79 (20) Upon the improved or traveled portion of any public alley except at locations where such parking is permitted by official signs or markings. (Bill 1978-9) 6/12/78 (21) On any part of marked and improved parking areas on public property other than marked or lined parking spaces (Bill 1979-23) 12/27/79 -? (22) In any area designated by the Council and posted as a special no parking zone, provided, however, that this prohibition shall not apply to the following: (a) Police vehicles, fire vehicles, ambulances and other emergency vehicles. ' (b) Any vehicle which displays the certificate or insignia issued by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety pursuant to Minn. Stat. 1979 Supplement, Sections 169.345 or 168.021. (Bill 1979-27) 12/27/79 (23) When any vehicle is parked or left standing on any public street or highway after a snowfall of at least 3 inches contrary to the provision of Section 9.02, Subdivision 11, of this Code. (Bill 1982-27) 8/9/82 Subd. 2. Additional Prohibitions. (1) No person shall move a vehicle not oVned by such person into any pro- hibited area or away from a curb or side of street such distance as is unlawful. (2) No person shall for camping purposes leave or park a house trailer on or within the limits of any street or highway or on any street or highway right-of-way except where signs are erected designating the place as a camp site. (3) No person shall stop or park a vehicle on a street or highway, when directed or ordered to proceed by any peace officer invested by law with authority to direct, control or regulate traffic. (4) No person shall park, obstruct or occupy with a motor vehicle any parking space, on public or private property, designated and posted as parking for handicapped persons pursuant to the State Building Code unless the vehicle has prominently displayed upon it an insignia or certificate issued by the Division of Motor Vehicles in the State Department of Public Safety pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 169.345 (3) (Bill 1977-8) 4/11/77 (5) No person shall park or place any motor vehicle in the front yard area of any lot within the city, except in the following locations: 1. Established driveway areas as defined in Section 3.27, Subdivision 36 of this Code. 2. Parking areas permitted by this Code. 3. Locations where the parking and storage of recreational vehicles and equipment is permitted by Section 3.38A of this Code. (Bill 1980-32) 12/22/80 8/9/82 ORDINANCE CODE 250.1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA -:?? 3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 426 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Award of Certificate of Appreciation to Richfield Optimist Club for Outstanding Community Service • Council Members: At the December 10, 1984, city council meeting, members of the Richfield Optimist Club will be present to accept a Certificate of Appreciation for Outstanding Community Service. Attached to this Council Letter is a copy of the certificate that will be presented to the Optimists. pectf yrlV/t?ibmitted, John G. Caftwri City Manager JGC/eja 0 • • 0 z n 3 H r O z 3 n 0 n rt rt n rt rt r• cn rt O N• ?:F" (D H- O rt X71 O (D n W O ? (D ?lj n C7" x 0 rt to v ?l ft r• z n w z r• M (D :E (1) :E O r- 0 rt o 1= 0+ a= Z= z rt k< iE rt Ql m w C m Qa m m rt r- z ?lj rt ;o m m ? O O rt m ?7, m m rt CO (D " -i ? W D r ?-i D O D :D" (D = N cn N O 0 cn h h cn r• n Z1 z m (D % = G C% m C r H- ;v sv :z ?)j m-q H- n n m rt z ?r rt 0 rt - n ?:r ::7 T ?1+ (f) r• w ?3' ?J' CD (D " ?-h o n rt (n (D (D rt • N• N• m 59 rt ?7 by v r. N• r- ::r (D (D m ?u 0 rt r- ?- n t-I co N-j ?:l r- X (D ?:T H. X". ¢ ? r? (D cD su co ? N r• b O ?C C O m O (D fDj Cn n n rt (D 'b OA rt p, 0 rt. m O rr 0 ?-4 ?71 x o ?-h rt L--J• O (D ?r rfi r (D A? "O (D (D (D n (D n r rt rt W n r• C n (D m m o (n m • m m n (D t ? rt, (D r b • (D O ((D o u i h7 ?5 n C r- ?l xJ rt p Cn m n zr r' < O r• O rt (D (D m r n i i ?C (D f-- ?i t7' X v r N N rt O: n (D rt. w G a (n 0 m ? ke, e _ ? rt r 0 0 ?o n to w iu v w r M n (D n rt r t to D H ° bo ( c0 ?cm r (D r ;-- -Q = (D rt (D n 4 rtnm _,;? n?a a ° rt* ( - rt 00 (D ( D x i o m O O N W ?osz F-- ? ? ?N C-1 F - rt x • O rt r• ? ? SL ? ?- (n rt - rt ?C F-' (D (n m cn c 0 0 x n rt n 5 S N N W sv O w (D (n rt (D r• ?i G cn O 0 f]. (D = ?? 0 n O N rt A) m O r• n rt rte O Sv ' C (D (D ?i rt i O r 1 (D Z Q n = T O r n rn O o Z O O °. n D Z n rri 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 425 Agenda December 10, 19814 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Award of Presentation of Appreciation to Rodney Nooner Council Members: In May, 1983, Richfield resident Rodney Nooner rescued a young boy from a Northern States Power substation. For his heroic actions, Mr. Nooner was recently honored at a Public Safety Awards dinner by the North Memorial Medical Center Emergency Services Division. • Mayor Hamilton has requested Mr. Nooner to be present at the December 10, 19824 City Council to receive a Certificate of Appreciation for his heroic efforts from the Richfield City Council. s , itted, pect7artwver i LLt, ohn G. City Manager ' JGC/eja • C) 4, O cn Q, 00?t as :: rt rt (D (D G' n v :? "(Dz O (D :E: o !l (D o ? m = z tS' (7 S 0 m m ?3' H. . H- G ;o H• rt G (D m rt ?l G"I-< -t n G• O = 3 P N H• rh G O m pi O O m H• x1 Zi m G O H• o (D P. rt H- O n :;a klo I G cn Q? V m oo L-? (D G M w (D '-C a. ? cD ?• a sv n? (D Co n z m C Z SZ 'O O O (D O - +-+ I- ?:l rh " O H (D '•C G O n d (D G ? t3' (D Sv ?i m O n G r7' N "C £ (D Sz rh (D o H• O G r M ft O C3 I- ? i w G F"t ?r n rh?MV A? w nm0rr ( wa n a N 3 -9? w za ? H (D rt rt O N n V n -? 40 (D H rt iU o H G rt z A? n n (D H• C) H• G " O rt (D ft O G ?3 H- rn H O ?h N G Cn rt G O (D rt• O cnn?x a • rt m rt m cn (D W O H. (n C w rt, N H• G rt ro G 3 !ZZoO OL4 D H- C) (D O O Q G" ri ?-h .T1? f•h H >y m F- (D ?C G H O t3 rt, C1, ?i I (D Z 0 C) r_ T M (J'1 C Z n D O Z Qn X 0 Z m O O Z rn X m ?n 0 O -h m D Z -417 / • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 424 Agenda December 10, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Lillian Hipp Recipient of Dorothea Nelson Award Council Members: Each year the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) accepts and reviews nominations for outstanding Minnesota recreators. On November 29, 1984, Lillian Hipp was the recipient of the Dorothea Nelson Award as the distinguished woman recreator in Minnesota for 1984. Lil is the manager of the Richfield Community Center. She received her bachelor of science degree from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Also, she has graduate credits toward a Masters Degree in Special Education from St. Thomas College and is certified as a pre-retirment program coordinator by Wayne State University. While working as a naturalist at Wood Lake Nature Center from 1972-1974, Lil designed the first "blind trail" in the state of Minnesota for the visually impaired and published an educational unit for the State Department of Natural Resources. She has been manager of the Community Center since its inception in 1974. She has been active with the Therapeutic Section of MRPA, serving as its chairperson in 1978. Affiliations with other professional associations and organizations include: 1976-1984 Member Richfield Community Education Advisory Council 1981-1982 Chairperson, Community Education Advisory Council 1979-1980 Co-Chair, MN National Employ the Handicapped Board 1979-1980 State Representative, National Foundation for the Blind in implementation of nationwide program 1979-1980 Member of MTC Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Advisory Board 1980 State Co-Chair, "Job Fair 18011, Governor's Conference on the Handicapped 1981 Fund Raising Chairperson, "Nutrition Conference", • South Hennepin Human Services Council 1981-1982 Co-Chair, Richfield and Bloomington International Year of the Disabled Committee 1983-1984 Executive Advisory Board Member, Normandale College Women's Resource Center -2- The city council and the Richfield community should be very proud of Lillian Hipp and extend congratulations to her as recipient of the Dorothea Nelson Award. R?elpectfu/ 7 Z?mitted , John G." Car`twri City Manager JGC/eja 0 0 • • rt H. O rt O ro w? ort rho ?:lw ?E n m (D n sz w m w N- n (D a v b Co F- H' z ?:' > : 0 r-h b m rt 0 w m x w_ z OAS x?: Nmm mm m t-i (D ?-+ N• . rh O m ;a n? 1170 0m rtm rt rt h d rh -4 O H- n ?3' n V ?:• w T 2 r-h w rn (D cn N• (D r1- c w ?7 m rt . En H- ;:o ;o rt H. O -I f2 c1 m v O rt N r N• Z x c„ (D m i +• O rt m 0 N rt N rt, N• rt ;o O H. ;o (D w In N- ?3' N O (D m N Z ?l x (D m (D 1- . ?l ¢l w 4 N a. :? r m x a (D 'o w cn N• rn rt, - a) w N• c7 o m c O :? w 'C c n ?l ?r £ O th x c a?:l - (D w r h N• m f). --I w w N m rtbv n r X71 o rt x Slw :E: rt n (D (D 4 ? 4 ( D ccn rt ? m w ° (D t ? t wZr- D al n ( ( D ?C rt rt r, n m ::r rt n t :3'= Nov w O b' (D N _ O (D (D Ft rt N- rt r n -? 5 n N (D r r rt (D (D w H- O I- w n I-- -Ir w :? C- 00 N• Z rt ?:l ?), rt w (D rt rt o n ?c ?c m z3 x O _ n H 'U N 3 r-1 O z rt b n rt, H. - (D ' O r• i-h (D ?o o ?.b _ l D "C C-4 rt O t-h (D ?7' 3 Cl+ H. n (D n ?3' O m ? (D ?+ n N n O n O r r G rt d -? m o O (D ?V O n w (D (D n z " (D n n m 0 c n N N (D O rh H- (D rt N n rt ?31 n V ?3- w rt w n w (D (D 'C H- " O (D w m m (D ?C w Ht (D rt, O z 3 mx we aH- n(D n -Ir 'b E (D 3 n 0 ?- (D n w n w rt ? CO ? o (D r• O M rocn a o Cw ooh (D m b ~i N n (D n rt ?, - i m O O r• ?-h (D CL m D Z u z n r C'1 cn m n M rn (A O r si O Z O D -v M n D O Z O r r C /L 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No, 423 Agenda November 26, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Authorization of a public hearing for December 17, 1984 to authorize housing mortgage revenue bonds .for Market Plaza, Inc. _ Council Members: As a part of the Market Plaza redevelopment project, the city council earlier authorized the sale of housing mortgage revenue bonds for the apartment phase of this project. Subsequent, to this authorization the United States congress passed additional legilation relating to the issuance of housing mortgage revenue bonds. Therefore, there is a need for the city council to hold another public hearing on this subject. The reason this must be done is that the new federal law mandates that the address of the project be included in the public hearing. There are no other changes, what so ever, in the location or size of the project or the amount of the bonding. It is recommended that the city council set a public hearing for December 17, 1984 at a special council meeting. Additional information will be available at the council meeting on Monday November 26th. Respect fly, submitted, John G. Cartes ght City Manager JGC/eja 0 • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter Np. 422 Agenda November 26, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Permit for Illuminated Sign at 6521 Nicollet Avenue 0 Council Members: Attracta Sign Incorporated has requested an advertising permit for an illuminated wall sign with an orange face and bronze returns. The sign will measure 11' x 18", and will be erected at Tan Line, 6521 Nicollet Avenue. City of Richfield Ordinance Code 3.49, subdivision 19, Illuminated Signs provides that City Council approval is require for illuminated signs. The city staff has reviewed the sign permit application and finds that the sign conforms to all applicable city ordinances. It is recommended that this permit be approved. ectfu y itted, ohn G. Car Wright City Manager JGC/eja 0 • S c l ? / S? s ? .?. • 10' Q 8 ??? ?` Ij i 1 ? C ??• Tzk--f) Cep lET1?- z- > • ATTRACTA SIGN, INC. 64 17 Penn Avenue South MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55423 (6121 866-3047- - 3? „ _ ? ? *C EO@ ?ppPOe? deg pogo ??- 7 - rf? CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 421 Agenda Novemer 26, 1984 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request by South Hennepin Human. Services Council Relating to Request for Additional Funding for the H.O.M.E. Program Council Members: On October 22, 1984 Debbra Determan, H.O.M.E. Program Coordinator for the South Hennepin Human Services-Council, appeared before the City Council seeking additional funding for the H.O.M.E. for the remainder of 1984. At that meeting, the City Council deferred action on this request, and referred the matter to the Senior Citizens/Handicapped Commission for a recommendation. The H.O.M.E. Program was determined that there South Hennepin. Area. The housekeeping services to persons. Charges are on to pay. The program serv Richfield community. was started several years ago when it was a need for this service in the program provides home maintenance and senior citizens and handicapped a sliding fee scale based upon ability es approximately 70.0 households in the The majority of funding for the home maintenance portion of this program originally came from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds of South Hennepin area cities and from the Metropolitan Council. Earlier this year, the Metropolitan Council cut off funding to SHHSC and instead provided funds to the Metropolitan Council of Churches to coordinate this program. The intent of this change in funding was to cut back on administrative costs by finding a church or volunteer agency to administer the program with volunteers in place of the SHHSC paid staff. Unfortunately, no agency or church in the South Hennepin Area has taken on this responsibility. Therefore, unless additional funds are received this year, the program will have to be cut back and fewer Richfield residents will be able to receive this service. SHHSC is negotiating with the Metropolitan Council to work out an agreement for 1985. • It is estimated that approximately $5,000 in additional funding is needed for 1984. The City of Edina has agreed to contribute an additional $6,000. Bloomington has contributed -2- $3,500, and will consider an additional $3,500 based upon contributions from Edina and Richfield. The H.O.M.E. Program has projected expenditures of $106,932 and projected revenues of $102,783. These figures include the contributions from Edina and Bloomington. The following sources of funding the $5,000 request have been identified: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS ACTIVITY BUDGET Removal of Arch. Barriers $ 25,000 Economic Develop (L/H/N) $141,243 School Reuse Study $ 15 , 510 Econ. Dev/ACQ $ 20,000 EXPENDED $ 25 , 000 $ 0 $ 14,400 0 BALANCE $ 25,000 $141,243 $ 1,100 $ 20,000 The above four CDBG activities are the most likely activities which could be tapped for a $5,000 transfer to meet the SHHSC request. For the three most recent CDBG program years (VIII-IX), the financial sttus of all CDBG funds are (as of 9/30/84): Budget $1,219,148 Expended $ 626,345 Balance $ 592,803 At their meeting on November 13, 1984, the Senior Citizens/Handicapped Commission recommended that the City Council authorize additional funding in the amount of $5,000 to SHHSC for the H.O.M.E. Maintenance Program for the remainder of 1984. If the City Council wishes to fund a supplemental allocation of $5,000, the City Manager recommends that the amount be taken from the Economic Development (L/H/N) activity, subject to the approval of Hennepin County of the fund transfer and documentation by SHHSC that the initial funding allocation of $7,200 has been expended for the SHHSC fiscal year 1984. Respectfully submitted, Q ohn G. Chrtwr ht City Manager 0 JGC/eja • XXXXXXX X,-...-.- -- -..- --- •C t C G -< I X X X ?C X X X X X ?C ?-. .-» .-+ .-y • (r ?+ C n O c0 V V V V Ln O O cp tD cp tD c0 V cn cn w O d V V U1 O O W CJdV Ocn(nO-t. N NNrV(,nC) nOCV OCn O Q1?--OcO?-+Q1N C) -N W O\DC^C1NNIn c-n Q1 Q' C m C - Loll ? Z o > C mcccmmr?*',?cm-, ocN?cm?o?nn?n pcjo cN's ? n, c+ -? r c zccacn-z.po?=os?-;rn-p?o zc? ?- f E A A r* .rr-??•-cz?oz sr>o7 .?roL/I c r z o o n c CD .- .r. f f rn co ?nnnr a?Qn?>cn?. 00Lr) nL") -In?CrnaG-Icn? n?-4v)n m cG rrl -0 _mmmm o - mzmm?n mmo C-) -G A A C C C 3 Z pr - C r ^rn c a ---I A a rn m Z C Cn Cn C ro a r--4 ?.+ . -? .., N O N G n rn ---{ anon ?r*t-3m 3 nm nmon a-4 `S •-?rnr*? m Azcnm cnrnt')m cAOZma.-.m ?+ n cn cn Cn -i --i n Z Q --i z - v a -? N r\ c?-r i -7v?n? mm rc-+ -i aa-icn A•-+3 C) rrl .? C rrl as m n rm mmmm -i G r•? Oma-O =Z aaQ- .? --? 3 Z -0 3 m Z -i cn O - cn • ?-• m o C .? n cn z --q r*m n cn a o m ?S c • --t -4 m cn z --i o a s -< -i m -t m -i z m a 0 z c-j n nnc-) n -t.mmnnnr)C-)-nmmnnC n m mmrrnrmmmaaxxmmrnmma=><MMm-q a m m m m m m m m x x x x x x x x N c ,.-• a, m v V N ?-+ r-- ?.. ? V © d CTT N W V V o w Q7 W O V W c0 c-n OC1N V OW OON E to Lm ko I.- Ul GN CD CD N.) W L71 V N to OOOCOC1000?- 0CD 00co00C) 0 W OUT O cD• ?D G " N F• cC ?-• N G:1 v ?--•- W Q V %o N N? N ?+ .> N W t•-- N V N kJo C) -j V WOco Cn1.0Cacnr--W NVu-, p W C1? W co V r--• ONJ d?- OtDOrIZ rl. N0 dNONC1C(-.)C) N CD O c,"I OO CC)=LM C) tD >CD OdCO'-'I ONp W c,-t rt O N © O O O O O C1 O C F-- O W O O O O N O W C Crn O f-• tD r^' N C1 V r+ _ m V W W ?! V W Ql V W cD r v W -7 ?•-• C1 V .> W C? N N CJ7 V - N OOOOCCD CD CD CD L_,000OC) W C) C rr C V - N N C ?1 ?7 W C Q (In k-D G ? ?• ? ? ?! Cn > V'7 N C1 o a ccoc?c,c?c._ cw?,c?oeCl?zooc?o c ? I I I a r z z z c-? A Cn a m m v A m .-? 3 Q ? m a Wo O Cr m d N A C N a m v CD a H.O.M.E. (HOUSEHOLD AND OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE FCR ELDERLY) Homemaker Program July 1, 1984 - June 30, 1985 Projected Expenses Personnel $ 71,637 Travel 1,765 Building Space 1,160 Communication & Utilities 884 Printing and Supplies 916 Equipment -0- Other 2,353 Total $ 78,715 Projected Revenue • 0 In Kind Services $ 10,700 Non-Federal Cash: Hennepin County 10,600 Municipalities 6,520 Customer Contributions 23,075 Metro Council Title IIIB 27,820 Total $ 78,715 H.O.M.E. (HOUSEHOLD AND OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE FOR ELDERLY) Chore/Home Maintenance Program July 1, 1984 - June 30, 1985 Projected Expenses • Personnel Office Supplies General Supplies Advertising Maintenance & Repairs Mileage Postage Printing Building Rental Communications Equipment/Materials Conferences Insurance Miscellaneous Total $ 91,845 364 300 150 2 40 5,335 320 700 1,375 928 3,300 150 750 1 ,175 $106,932 Projected Revenue • In Kind Services Non Federal Cash: Hennepin County Bloomington Richfield Edina Eden Prairie Richfield Fix & Paint Edina Fix & Paint Customer contributions Federal Cash: Energy Assistance Emergency Repair Program Total * not guaranteed ** based on work completed $ 9,583 10,600 10,500** 3,600** 10,000** 2,500** 8,000** 10,000** 21,000* 17,000* $102,783