06-11-84 agenda x
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 211
Agenda June 11, 1984
The Honorable Mayor _
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Consideration of Fee Waiver Requests for Seven
Food and Beverage Concessions for the Fourth of
July Committee and Various Community Organizations.
Council Members:
Mr. Arnie Odefey, on behalf of the Fourth of July Committee
and the Richfield Optimist Club, has submitted requests for a
fee waiver for seven food and bevera e concession licenses. All
g
of these licenses are related to the 1984 Fourth of July
celebration.
City staff has denied an administrative fee waiver for these
licenses, since they do not meet the guidelines adopted by the
City Council on April 12, 1982 (copy attached). Section 3 of
the guidelines states "Only license fees for which no
inspectional service is required will be considered for fee
waiver".
The license applications show that both pre-packaged and
~ readily perishable foods will be served. These require on-site
inspections by City health inspection personnel. (Even though
two applications state only canned pop and balloons will be
sold, Mr. Odefey said their sales items may be expanded to
include food items.) -
Since the fee waiver requests do not meet the established
guidelines, and because inspections will be required at a cost
to the City, staff recommends the requests be denied.
Mr. Odefey will be present at the council meeting to respond
to any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
John G. Cartwright
City Manager
JGC:sb
~
' ' F` _ ~ ~~t
` ~ ~
r \ - 1
r POLICX RELATING TO W~IvER OF LICE`;SE FEES
r
Or. April 12, 1982, the city council adopted guidelines to clarify the cit~-'s
aolicv relating to the waiver of license fees. These guidelines are established
in an effort to clarify the somewhat confusing references in the city code
relating to the waiver of license fees.
The following guidelines are to be used in evaluating eligibility for a
license fee waiver:
1. The establishment where the machine is located must be the
party applying for the license;
2. Only groups that are religious, civic, benevolent, educational,
veterans, or nonprofit will be considered for fee waived licenses;
3. Only license fees for which no inspectional service is required
will be considered for fee waiver;
4. For licenses requiring background investigation, the cost of
investigation may be substituted for the license fee if all -
• other criteria are met.
In establishing these guidelines, the council has authorized the staff
to administratively approve requests for waiver. of license fees, if the above
criteria are met. Any licenses for which a fee waiver is requested that appear
to not meet these criteria should be forwarded to the city council for review
through the office of the city clerk.
. ~
~ ~ CITY OF RICH I=LD, :~~IPdi~ESOTA
r f'i OZ~ ZCe of C1tV :.C:i C:C e?~
t ~ ~
1
Council Letter T~Ic . ? 0 7
Agenda April 12, 1982
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Council Members:
Subject: Discussion of Policy Relating to t~laiver of
License Fees
Various organizations in the city often request the city
council to "waive" fees for licenses which they are requesting.
City council members and the staff have experienced some con-
fusion as to the crualificatior,s for a "fee waived" license.
Chapter V, Section ~.1~, c~~division 5 of the c_ty code relating
to soft drinx fee waived licenses states, in part, "...the city
council may authorize the clerk to issue a license, without
payment of any license fee, where the proposed licensee is a
religious, civic, benevolent, educational, veterans or non-profit
organization..." Chapter V.I, Section 6.01, subdivision 8,
• paragraph (2) relating to fee waived licenses for food licenses
states, in part, "...governmental subdivisions, charitable
institutions, houses of worship, homes for the aged, childcare
homes, schools, charitable and non-profit hospitals,...are not
charged a fee therefore...provided that any food vending machine
located in any such establishment must be owned by the establish-
ment..."
It appears that the confusion regarding eligibility for a
license wee waiver arises from the fact that most of the above-
noted establishments do not apply for the license, and are not,
therefore, the licensee, and/or do not oom the vending machines.
Some of the fee waived licenses granted this year were listed by
the location of the vending machine, but were actually licensed
to a particular vendor, rather than to the organization in whose
facility the machine is located.
?also, some of the 1_censas granted to a vendor were for
C_iurCheS Or SChOOlS. °::~:"~ie of trl~~ 1S a ie~_ueSt from the
Coca Cola Bottling Mid;west (ccpy attache:) for a reruns of license
fees thou paid for soft drink vending machines (S?5) placed at
S~. Peter's Church anc th= ~~-~st ~•;icidle ~c~ool. t~e have also
Cer. ~1~-' . eCeiV2d c . CC;;~~_ ~ O i ~::C Ci:G~l `C ASCOClal,i0i1 LO
"~:..i~ie the Del do ~c Cyr ~P.~v ~~i_~ 5 'i r
_ :7e DO~_~Grl_ C
`r.is spring, and it is •unc__ar ~r;:~~ether she Sub •?erchar.ts Associa-
tion cualified as a reiiQ`ous, civic, ~e=evolent, educational,
verterans or non-profit o~c~n~zation.
Council Letter iJo. 107 -2- April 12, 192
'because of this ccrfusion, it is recor~u-nended that the city
cc~.uicil establish the following cuicelines for waiver of license
sees W.'llch the Staff W111 aG~'~Ti1..^.1S per, Dr'_ng1:'lg CP.1V Q_L'eStlO:laD~ e
interpretations to the city council:
1. The establishment where the machine is located must
be the party applyine for the license;
2. Only groups that are religious, civic, benevolent,
educational, veterans, or non-profit will be con-
sidered for fee waives licenses;
3. Only license fees for which no inspectional service is
required will be considered for fee waiver;
4. For licenses requiring background investigation, the
cost of investigation may be substituted for the
license fee if all other criteria are met.
In addition, the council should consider the request of the
Hub Merchants Assec_.~tion for G f : cr of $1 00 per day for a
carnival. .he Association would h:.~.~e tc be considered a civic
orcanization to qualify under this provision.
Respectfully submitted,
Karl r+ollenberger
City Manager ,
KN/eja
cc: City Clerk
Director Administrative Services
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 211
Agenda June 11, 1984
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION REQUESTING MNDOT
FUNDING FOR RECONSTRUCTION IN 1985 OF LONG-
FELLOW AVENUE, 66TH TO 69TH STREET
Council Members:
At the May 29, 1984 City Council meeting, the City Council
discussed the proposed improvement to the Longfellow Avenue
Frontage Road south of 66th Street. The attached resolution
will be sent to the State as a formal request.
The resolution:
1. Requests the State to reconstruct the frontage road from
66th to 69th Street and overlay the remainder;
2. Accepts jurisdiction over the road once the work is
completed.
Construction of Longfellow Avenue will not be done until
1985, as there is not sufficient time to complete the state
process in 1984. The city staff will provide the city council
with more frontage road information during the subsequent work
study session.
Respectfu~y'ls rr~itted ,
John G. Cart right-~'
City Manager
•
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING MNDOT FUNDING
FOR LONGFELLOW AVENUE FRONTAGE ROAD
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has
proposed to provide certain funding for the reconstruction of
Longfellow Avenue from 66th Street to 69th Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Richfield, Minnesota:
1. That the Minnesota Department of Transportation provide
this funding for the reconstruction of Longfellow Avenue, 66th
Street to 69th Street, to mutually acceptable standards, except
for the curb on the east side of the street and any extraneous
storm sewer work;
2. That the Minnesota Department of Transportation provide
the funding for an overlay south of 69th Street to the 24th
Avenue entrance to I-494;
3. That the City of Richfield will accept jurisdiction over
the roadway from 66th to 69th Street after the improvements are
completed.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1984.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 210
Agenda June 11, 198
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Additional Curb Cut on 65th Street at the Former
Location of Pillsbury Avenue
Council Members:
The Question
A question raised by a member of the City Council that asked
whether an additional curb cut should be made on 65th Street at
vacated Pillsbury Avenue to improve traffic circulation in the
Hub parking lot.
The Analysis
. First, the area has been developed as a planned unit
development with cross parking agreements and with an overall
traffic circulation plan. As part of the approval of this plan,
the city agreed to vacate Pillsbury Avenue to allow additional
parking for the uses in the area. Unfortunately, at present
a number of site improvements, including the construction of
concrete end islands and parking lot striping have not been
completed. This is currently creating a confusing traffic flow
situation in the area.
These improvements are scheduled to be completed as part of
the Nautilus addition to the Hauser/Snyder building whichi is
presently under construction. Once these improvements
are constructed, staff believes that the traffic circulation
pattern on the site will be clear and better defined. The
construction at the Nautilus site has also resulted in the
closure, or diminished use, of two existing curb cuts off of
65th Street into the site. Once construction is completed,
these curb cuts will again be available for use. One of these
curb cuts is approximately 120 feet west of the site of the
proposed curb cut in the area where Pillsbury Avenue was
vacated. The addition of another curb cut as suggested could
result in less safe conditions on 65th Street because of the
additional turning movements in and out of the site in close
proximity to the other curb cuts.
Council Letter No. 210 -2-
• The addition of another curb cut and driving aisle
would result in the loss of 37 parking stalls, which could be
detrimental to the development in the area. These stalls are
necessary for the proposed Nautilus Swim and Fitness Club, and
existing tenants in the Hauser/Snyder structure already feel
that parking in the area of their uses has been diminished too
much because of the Nautilus addition. The addition of the
curb cut and driving aisle would also tend to confuse the
traffic pattern which is being established by the improvements
in this planned unit development and would require the redesign
of the parking layout in the area. This would result in
additional expense and improvements for the property owners.
The only advantage to the proposed curb cut would be
that the previous traffic flow pattern to which customers have
been accustomed to over the years in the shopping area, would be
maintained. However, believes feels that once the improvements
are completed, and a new traffic pattern is defined, that people
will become accustomed to it and any problems which presently
exist will be minimized.
The Department of Community Services reports that any new
curb cuts will, of course, require expenditures (no estimates
made at this time) to modify the parkway irrigation system. The
City Engineer advises against a curb cut at vacated Pillsbury
• Avenue because it would occur at a curve in 65th Street. Also,
if such a curb cut would be made, it would be necessary to have
Pillsbury Avenue become a public street in order to provide
adequate traffic control enforcement. If so, there would be
added the maintenance expense to the city budget.
Conclusion
It is staff's conclusion that the proposed additional curb
cut is not necessary and could, in fact, be detrimental to the
shopping area. A considerable number of parking stalls would be
lost. Two property owners would have to redesign their lots
and incur additional expense. Further, the additional curb
cut could result in less safe conditions on 65th Street, as
well as encouraging traffic in the parking lot to travel at a
higher than desired speed.
RespectfuL~~ submitted,
/ 1 ; _T ji'l'
_ _
1
John G. Car~`twri~g~ht
City Manager
JGC/eja
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
• Council Letter No. 209
Agenda June 11, 1984
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Public Hearing for Addition to Alley Paving -
City Project No. 793B
Council Members:
At the May 14, 1984 council meeting, the city coun~~il set
June 11 as the date of t'ne public hearing for the paving of the
alley between Sheridan Avenue and Russell Avenue, 67th to 68th
Street. Notices have been mailed to all affected property
owners, letting them know of the opportunity to address the
council at the public hearing.
However, an error in the legal notice of this public
hearing published in the Sun Newspaper makes it necessary to
continue the public hearing. Staff recommends that the
public hearing be opened, and public comments be received and
then continue the public hearing to the June 25, 1984 city
council meeting to allow a corrected notice to be published and
mailed .
Attached is a resolution setting the public hearing for the
June 25, 1984 council meeting.
Respectf y submitted,
John G. Cartw 'ght
City Manager
JGC/eja
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING ADDITION
TO CITY PROJECT 793B
WHEREAS, the city engineer has prepared a preliminary report
with reference to the improvement of the following alley by
permanent paving:
Alley between From To
Sheridan Avenue and Russell Avenue 67th Street 68th Street
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. A public hearing on said proposed improvement is hereby
called to be held on June 25, 1984, commencing at 7 p.m.
in the council chambers of City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue
South, Richfield, Minnesota, at which time the council
will consider the improvement of this alley in accordance
with the report and assessment of abutting property for
all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, at an estimated cost
of the improvement of $24,095.00.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
give published and mailed notice of such hearing in the
manner required by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
11th day of June, 1984.
John Hamilton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sylvia K. Bergh, City Clerk
f,_~
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
• Council Letter No. 208
Agenda June 11, 1984
The Honorable Mayor -
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: A Variance Proposal to Allow Expansion of a Non-
conforming House at 6637 3rd Avenue South
Council Members:
Mr. William Roberts is proposing to construct an addition
onto his house. The dwelling is a non-conforming structure
since it does not meet city requirements for front and sideyard
setbacks. There exists a 3.5 -foot setback from the north
property line instead of the required five foot sideyard
setback and a 22.1 foot setback from the front and lot
Y
line instead of the required 30 foot setback. Therefore, a
variance has been requested to allow expansion of a non-
conforming structure.
The applicant seeks a variance to add an addition to the
south side of the existing house. The house faces west. The
proposed addition does not project into any required sideyards.
The need for the two variances are for already existing
variances on the west and north sides of the house.
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. Section 3.30, subdivision 5, paragraph (a) establishes
the interior sideyard setback in residential districts at 5
feet and the frontyard setback at 30 feet.
2. Section 3.29, subdivision 1, states that no non-
conforming structure may be enlarged unless a variance has been
granted.
3. Section 3.40, subdivision 6 lists three conditions
which must be met before a variance may be granted.
STAFF REVIEW
Upon reviewal of the proposal, staff has made the following
findings:
•
Council Letter No. 208 -2-
1. That there are special circumstances affecting this
• land not common to other properties or similar
district. There is nothin inherent to th 1 nd
e a or
g
use which makes it uncommon with regard to its
neighborhood. The narrow, 50 foot wide lots are
standard for this residential neighborhood. There also
appear to be no special circumstances affecting
the building itself.
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for
the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property
rights.
Granting the variance is not necessary to preserve
substantial property rights. The present residential
use would be allowed to continue.
3. That the granting of the application will not
materially and adversely affect the health or safety of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood and
will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to improvements in the
neighborhood.
With the present 18.3 feet of separation between the
a licant s house and the residence to the north no
PP
adverse affects should be created by the proposed
• variance. The addition itself would meet sideyard
setback requirements from the southern property line.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Since the variance request does not meet the necessary
conditions for its approval, staff recommends that the variance
be denied.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On a 7-1 vote, the commissioners recommended that the
variance allowing expansion of the non-conforming dwelling be
approved.
Respectfully submitted
John G. Cartwright
City Manager
JGC/eja
N?aY 3, ~ g8li
City cf F,ichfield
0700 Portland ;eve. moo.
Richfield, i~.innescta 55+23
Lear Ci ty of s~ichi'ield,
The house I own and am plan.*iing an~addition to was built in 1x33.
By talrcing T.a'ith the older property owners in the area, I_:ave fotzrd
out that it is one of the older houses in the reighb~rhood and that
when it was built its' lot size was ::such larger than it is ncw. T::e
caner, in selling eff parts of his lot, has made the House 3.5 feet
from the north property line. Gam ether this was alloyed back then or he
got a variance at that time I rave not been able to Geter~...~.ne. This is the
reason I am applying fcr a variance permit.
The reasoru I am planning an addition to this hcuse are its' lac.
of size and certain design flaws. The main bedroom is o ~ 1~ feet ar_d
its' dcor opens into the dining room. T:ze other bedroom is a x .0 feet
a_rd 'Has a diagonal corner for the door, The bat~^~ oc~: is 5 ~ 4.5 feet,
the smallest I have ever seen. It is also situated in the kitchen.
'w7ien I bought the House I was told that this is nct a11cT~red for F,N.
approval and was lucky to get a favorable inspector. T:".e hcuse may not
be salable with tris resign. ''"~fiestair~•;ay and the current pl~~mbing do
rct meet existing codes. ;tiith the bedsccm additicr_, and alter?tion that
I plan to the rest of the house, it ~roulr be more li viable ar_d meet
all codes.
?.s can be seen by the attached su_Y^:ey, even ~rrith .:.y house bei.ro
3.5 feet from the property line, there is still 18.3 feet between it
and the rouse or. the r_orth. The proposed addition is 5 feet from the
south line so there *rrill be 10 feet bet:aeen these ~,c houses. I de not
feel that the granting of this application will adversely affect the
health or safety of my neighbors.
.:sincerely,
n
,-~/fir-~'-~'-
~~illiam K. Roberts
501 Wesi 78th StTeei WOOOROW A. SROWN, R.LS.
Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 Pres;dent
(612) 881-0047
SURVEY FOR= MR. 81LL ROBERT S
-N-
I I/2 STORY
~ STUCCO
3t 6633
34.6 _ _ 140, ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ \ 140,3 ~
~ 27.9 ~ SCALES ~ .
~ ~ 1 lNCH: 20 FEET n ,
~ ~ m~ M
~ 'r~ CYCLONE FENCE ~
i ~~t9 ~'le ~ ~ ~---28.90--- ~ ~ Y •.i_
~ 138,2 138,9 M 139.4 Q,'~~'Y ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~A
22.1---- m 3E2 0.8 X -a I.
~B~I ~ I STORY FRAME
~ ~ v Ix
Q O ~ ~ ik 6637 a 139.7 140 6 OO ~ ^
~ 22.2 \ 8.1 rQi 36.2 ,r _ r`'~ ~ ~
~j 2z o l1
~ 138,9` ~ t4.6Q-='1~' ~ GARAGE ~ -..yy~~~
W ..',I;: . . - .n PROP ,R ~ o I .1J
' ~1 ^ K ~ ~ nN N o.g~a
N'
W ~{9 N,3~*~ ~ X4:68 ~ ~ , zz.o . Z~Q~~~
•~~.3~. \ 138,9 S.I ,x.139.. ~~35 2 9<~, -~~:.c
r\a3 I_~- - -34.8 - - - 128.94\ ,.~i - CYCLONE FE NCE ~ ~ 16 2 . x
~ ~ ~ 24.0 ~ 139 ,h ~ -
Q I 138,9 \ 1 STORY ~ -;GARAGE ;
~ FRAME ~ - 1
6639 ~
n
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lot 15, Block 4 McCUTHAN'S PORTLAND AVENUE PARK, according
to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record, Hennepin
county, Minnesota.
NOTES b LEGEND
Benchmark: Top S.E. flange bolt on Fire Hydrant N.W. Quadrant
67th Ave. So, and 3rd. Ave. Elevation 139.61.
City of Richfield Datum.
I hereby certify that this sketch plan or report Was prepared
by me or under my supervision and that I am a duly registered
. land surveyor under tha laws of the State of Minnesota.
. Date April 4, 19&4 Reg. i'lo. 15230
J ~
1
t `,1
1y
~ tiv
c. ~ G-., --t..
1._.----
r
~
C]r'''~r~~~
Rs«"
K~
<.~o u
_ ~
~
1 ~ j',
~
1
r ~ f
' ~ ~f {
1
w"c'l~j ~J `
1 `
~__~----ti ~.Ko~"7
---~--t,
u- y--k"'3
' ~ 1
t
J
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 207
Agenda June 11, 1984
The Honorable Mayor -
R and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Presentation by Lions Club to Community Center
Council Members:
The Richfield Lions Club held a pancake breakfast at the
Community Center on Sunday, April 1, 1984. The proceeds,
(approximately $700) from the breakfast are being donated to
the Community Center. The Young at Heart Club will determine
the specific use for these funds. Representatives of the
Lions Club will be in attendance a.t the Monday, June 11, 1984
council meetin at PM to make the resentation
g 7 :00 p
Respectfully submitted,
, .
John G . Cartwr,~.ght
City Manager
JGC/eja
•
f
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
• Council Letter No. 206
A ends une
g J 11, 1984
The Honorable Ma or
Y
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Presentation of A Respect for Law Week Plaque
of Appreciation to Police Officer Armin Dubberke
Council Members:
Doug Waller, President, will present on behalf of the
Richfield Optimist Club a plaque of appreciation to Police
Officer Armin Dubberke at the June 11, 1984 city council
meeting. This presentation will be in conjunction with
Respect for Law Week. Police Officer Dubberke and Public
Safety Director Morgan will be present at the June 11, 1984 to
receive this plaque.
Respectf~ y submitted,
~
ohn G. Ca~twr ht
City Manager
JGC/eja
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
• Council Letter No. 204
Agenda June 11, 1984
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Council Consideration of Sponsorship of Juvenile
Justice Grant - Storefront/Youth Action, Inc.
Council Members:
Steve Lepinski, Executive Director of The Storefront/Youth
Action, Inc., is requesting that the City of Richfield act as
the sponsoring unit of government for a Juvenile Justice Grant
that Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. is submitting on behalf of
the Minnesota Youth Intervention Program Association (YIPA).
YIPA is a statewide association of community based youth
counseling programs such as the Storefront. Storefront/Youth
Action has been involved in YIPA since its inception. The
• association has been responsible for the maintenance of a small
amount of state funds which are awarded to about 26 youth
counseling agencies (including Storefront/Youth Action).
Recently, YIPA became aware of some federal funds available
through the Runaway Youth Act. These funds would support
networking efforts such as YIPA in addressing the problem of
runaway youth. Since YIPA is not an incorporated entity,
Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. agreed to submit the federal grant
application on behalf of the organization. There is a match
requirement for the federal funds. The matching funds could be
obtained from state Juvenile Justice Funds. In order to receive
the state funds the grant application must be sponsored by a
unit of government. Therefore, the Storefront/Youth Action,
Inc. is asking Richfield to sponsor the state grant application.
Attached are several summary pages from the grant
application. Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. has provided
the city manager with a complete application. The
Storefront/Youth Action, Inc. would appreciate the City of
Richfield's sponsorship of this application which would be a
benefit to troubled youth throughout the State of Minnesota.
Council Letter No. 20~ -2-
Nancy Hite, Director of the Minneapolis Youth Diversion
•
Program and Steve Lepinski, Executive Director of the
Storefront/Youth Action, Inc., will be present at the June 11
city council meeting to answer any questions the city council
may have.
0
spectf 11 mitted, ~
9 /
C,~h~~
iG'~
John G. art 'ght
City Manager ~
JGC/eja
_ _ _ _ _
STATE OF MSNNESOTA APPLIC ?ION FOR ACTTOIV. GRANT
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM _ PAGE 2
~ROJE CT TITLE .
SPONSORING UNIT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Minneapolis Youth Diversion Program
16. PROJECT SUI~IARY (See Instructions) Note: For a 2nd. or 3rd year application, provide
a sumaa:y oY progress toward accomplish-
ment of project goals. "
This project will coordinate a network of services throughout the state of. Minnesota to
meet the needs of runaway and homeless youth. This will be done by strengthening and
developing an already existing network of agencies (Minnesota Youth Intervention Progra:..
Association - YIPA) that provide prevention and aftercare services to runaway and hom~l;
youth and their families. •
Currently the resources available to runaway youth are neither planned or coordinated at
the state level. Services are fragmented,. and the state takes no role in developing
resources to meet the needs of the 11,149 youth who were reported as runaway during 1983.
This project proposes to develop a comprehensive plan for the delivery of services to
runaway and homeless youth statewide. Coordination will be done. between various public
and private agencies, and emphasis will be placed on developing resources .in unserved
areas.
~y hiring~a Project Coordinator YIPA proposes to maintain a network of 40 agencies, iden-
tify existing prevention and aftercare resources, conduct needs assessment, distribute
preventionfeducation materials, develop new programs, develop a system to count and
report runaway and homeless youth, publish a Statistical Research Report,• a Directory
of Services, and sponsor a conference.
A Project Coordinator and members of YIPA will work together on these activities and
in working with state agencies and the legislature to explore a more effective role for
the state in developing and strengthening service. Interaction between the state and
service providers will be stimulated to improve the overall provision of service. Work
.will be done across jurisdictional lines to bring increased attention to the problems
of youth within Minnesota.
17. BUDGET SUMMARY AND SOURCES OF PROJECT SUPPORT
a. Personnel. $ 33,840 JJDPA Funds Requested ~ 9,546
b. Fringe Benefits. $ 4,973
c. Travel $ 1, 000
d. • Equipment. $ -0-
e. Supplies $ 1,518 Other sources (List);
P. Contracted Services. , $ _0-
g. Construction $ -0' Federal Government `65,000 ~
h. Other Direct Costs $ 33,215 '
i. Indirect Costa $ -0-. (Runac~ay & Homeless ~
Total Project Cost. 74,546 f Youth Program) $
~ -...5
STA=E OF MINNESOTA 3PPLICATIOAI FOR ACTION GRANT
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM PAGE 3
1$. PROBLEM STATEMENT (See Instructions)
The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension reports that during 1983,11,149
youth were reported to local police agencies as runaways.. It is anticipated
that many more go unreported.
Currently the resources and services available•to runaway. and homeless youth
and their families are neither planned nor coordinated at the state level. The ,
state does not take an active role in developing statewide efforts to address
the issue of runaway and homeless youth. .
While members of YIPA provide services to this pogulation.in diverse areas of
the state, and shelters are available in Brainerd and Minneapolis, a signifi-
cant number of other areas have no identified service.
There is a need for a coordinated comprehensive service network of runaway and
homeless youth serving agencies. The project will.coordinate resources and .
services to runaway and homeless youth and their families between and among the'
public and private sector. An_emphasis will be placed on developing resources
in unserved areas of the state, and improving various public and private state
systems.
YIPA will work with the Governor's Council on Youth, and the legislature to ex-
plore a more effective role for the state in developing and strengthening ser-
vices. Work will be done across jurisdicational lines to bring increased atten-
tion to the problems of. youth within Minnesota. Interaction between the state..
and service providers will be stimulated~to improve the overall provision of
service.
Project staff will thoroughly assess the needs of Minnesota's runaway and homeless
youth by meeting with local. service providers (including Juvenile Court, Human
Services, police, schools, etc.) around the state to identify local issues rela-
tive to runaway and homeless youth and their families: Further, existing services
and service gaps will be identified. Staff will provide assistance in planning
and developing responses to service gaps.
A better system to count and report data on runaway and homeless youth will be
developed. Future planning efforts will utilize this data.
The three existing sheit~rs for runaway youth in the state could more effectively
serve youth if they had increased contact with each other and with a statewide
network of service providers.
STATE OF MINNESOTA ~3PLICATION FOR ACTION GRANT
E`:ERCY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM PAGE 1+
-
19. GOALS: List and number the goals of this pro~ect•. (See Instructions)
1. Identify prevention and aftercare services in 15 communities that
currently are not identified. ~ ~ •
_ 2. Maintain a network of approximately 40 agencies throughout the state
• that p=ovide services to runaway and homeless youth and. their families.
. 3. Conduct an assessment of the needs of runaway youth in•approximately 30
localities. ~ .
' 4. Develop a coordinated comprehensive plan for the development and maintenance
of a statewide network of services to youth and families.,
5. Distribute the following prevention/education materials statewide:
• ~ 4 posters, 1,000 copies each 1
4 brochures, 1,000 copies each
4 different public service announcements
i
6. Assist in the development of new prevention and aftercare services in 5
communities that are currently unserved. i
7. Develop a system to collect information statewide on runaway and homeless- f
youth,
•
ti
8. .Collect data on_runaway and homeless .youth in Minnesota from 40 agencies.
i
9. Publish a directory of services available .to runaway youth in Minnesota.
10. Sponsor a statewide training workshop or conference to address the issues
~ of runaway and homeless youth.
• ~
' ~ ~ ~ ,
v1~,y~ ,~..:..~~L..,.,.~; ~ APPLICATION FUR ACTION GRANT
ENHRCY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JUSTICE GRAI3T PROGRAM PAGE 5
20. WORK PROGRAM (See Instructions)
YIPA plans to develop this proposed project as an expansion of its existing
organization and current projects.. Currently YIPA has 27. member organizations
that belong to the network. During 1984 the organization has trained 19 of
its members in local networking skills. Networking meetings to identify the .
issues facing youth, available services, and local service gaps has been done
'successfully in 11 communities .around the State of Minnesota. Meetings involved
personnel from Juvenile Court, Human Services, police, schools, and other .public
and private agencies that work with youth, as well as local elected officials
and community representatives. This same model would be used under this project
to do such meetings and establish local networks in areas of the state where
they have not yet been done. Identifying new resources would also provide new
agencies for membership in YIPA's statewide network.
• The•key to the feasibility and success of~this project is .the hiring of a Project
Coordinator. Currently YIPA has no staff, and projects and activities are carried
out by the organization's members who are responsible for the administration of '
individual youth service programs, and frequently service delivery as well. YIPA
_ has developed good relationships with state officials and legislators as well as
with other people around 'the state and nation who care about youth. A staff.per-
son would build on and strengthen. this groundwork-and develop and strengthen
.services to runaway and homeless youth and their families beyond the current
level in the State of Minnesota. Staff would be available to provide technical
assistance to local communities for the development and funding of programs .
needed to fill service gaps. Staff would also work with legislators and, various
state officials to increase attention tp youth issues and the role of the state
in strengthening and developing services to runaway and homeless youth and their
families. '
The distribution of prevention/education materials statewide will be made possible
by utilizing the identified resources in each locality. YIPA members will be r
' given materials to distribute in local schools, clinics, bus depots, churches,
and other public areas. These materials. will publicize reasons why youth run
away or become homeless, and where help can be gotten locally to alleviate. these
problems, or to receive aftercare services.
The staff person will also utilize the network of agencies to collect data about
runaway and homeless youth which will be used .for research and•future planning.,
Currently YIPA is developing a proposal with a private .consultant that would
design a statewide computerized data collection system. Funding for the entire
data collection system will be sought from~the state and private. local sources. _
Software funded by this project would enable the retrieval of descriptive data
on runaway and homeless youth.
During the summer of 1984 YIPA will sponsor the first statewide conference in
Minnesota concerning youth issues. The staff person will utilize the mailing-
list and model currently being developed, and work with a committee to plan-
and~implement a second statewide conference on youth issues. At the conference
a directory of youth service programs in the state will be•distributed.
f erson will develo the direct.o Fees will be charged to
The staf p P ry
• conference participants to help defray the costs of the conference. These
fees are listed in the budget as project income. Fees have been kept
nominal as most youth serving agencies in the state have had to severely
reduce conference and training budgets due to fiscal constraints.
This project will provide funding to hire staff, print materials, collect
data, and sponsor a statewide conference. This project will expand upon
the current activities of YIPA and develop and strengthen services to youth
and their families. .YIPA has over the years developed relationships and
sponsored projects which lay solid groundwork for this project. Adding staff
to this already successful statewide .network will result in the successful
achievement of the proposed outcomes.
EVALUATION:
Internal: The project will utilize a management by objective approach
to evaluate the success of the results of the project. The above mentioned
outcomes are designed to be quantifiable and specific in order to enable
documentation and evaluation of the results. Program updates will be
prepared for the Board of Directors monthly, and program reports will be
done at least quarterly. An Annual Report will be prepared at the end of
12 months .
External: The evaluation process will include soliciting feedback and
evaluation from network members, state and local officials, legislators,
and other community members. These comments will be tabulated and
summarized, documented in the Annual Report, and used for future ..planning.
WORK PLAN:
Position Months Required/
Responsible: Timeline:
Activity:
Identify prevention and aftercare„services Program 3 Months
throughout the state that currently Coordinator October - December
are not identified.
Tasks:
1. Contact unserved communities
through contacting local juvenile
courts, police, schools, etc. and
generating a list of local people
who care about youth and particularly
agencies who provide service to
runaway and homeless youth and
their families. '
2. Meet individually with agencies
providing services to runaway and
homeless youth.
Activity:
Conduct needs assessm?nts in approximately Program 1 Month
30 communities. Coordinator December
Tasks:
1, Set-up meeting of local resources
identified above.
Position Months Required/
Resuonsible : 'timeline :
2. Facilitate exploration of youth •Program 3 Months
issues, available services, and Coordinator January - march
service gaps. With existing
Member
3. Provide technical assistance to Program Ongoing
assist communities to address gaps. Coordinator
Activity:
Maintain a network of approximately Program 12 Months -
40 agencies that serve youth. Coordinator & Ongoing
Tasks: Association
1. raintain an accurate mailing list. President
2. Type~and distribute minutes and Secretary 12 Months -
' other mailings. Ongoing
3. Facilitate exchange of information. Program 12 Months -
Coordinator Ongoing
4. Interpret network to prospective Program 12 Months -
members and others. Coordinator Ongoin g
Activity:
Develop a coordinated comprehensive Program ' 2 Months
plan to address the needs of runaway Coordinator Apr31 - May
and homeless youth.
Tasks:
1. Utilize needs assessment information
and listing of identified services.
2. Work caith state legislature,
Governor's Council on Youth,
Department of Corrections,
Department of Public Welfare,
Juvenile Justice Advisory Council, ~ '
Department of Education to develop
plan.
Activity:
Distribute prevention/education
materials statewide.
Tasks:
1. Design and develop materials, Program 2 Months
and/or select already existing Coordinator/ March - April
materials. Volunteer
Marketing .Specialist
2. Distribute materials to member Program 1 Month
agencies. Coordinator May
1
• Responsible: Timeline:
Activity:
Develop a system to collect information
descriptive of runaway and homeless. youth.
Tasks:
1. Work with existing YIPA Research Program 2 Months
Committee to design mechanism to Coordinator/ October - November
collect data. Research
Committee
2. Purchase software Program 1 Month
Coordinator December
3. Contact participating agencies and Program 1 Month
distribute data collection forms Coordinator December
' and train agencies is useage.
Activity:
Publish a Statistical Research Report. Program
Tasks: Coordinator
1. Retrieve data from computer. January, 198b
2. Analyze and interpret data.
3. Write report.
4. Distribute to appropriate people ~ March, 1986
including legislature, state '
officials, and participating
agencies.
A tivit .
c y
Publish a Directory of Services Program
available to runaway and homeless Coordinator
youth.
Tasks:
1. Identify resources and gather 6 Months
necessary information. October - March
2. Design and develop Directory, 1 Month
March
3. Distribute May -
On goin g
Activity:
Sponsor a Training Workshop or
Conference.
Tasks:
1. Plan and develop content of Program 5 Months
Conference. ~ Coordinator/ February - June
Training Committee
2. Publicize .Conference Program 2 Months
Coordinator May - June
3. Coordinate Conference activities. Program 4 Days
• Coordinator/ July
TYO{n~ete f'e~ssndreva~ . .
STATE OF MLNNESOTA A.D?LIGATION FOR ACTION GRANT
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM PAGE 6
21. STAFF AND OTHER RESOURCES {See Instructions}
a. STAFF
POSITION:. Project Coordinator, Full Time
This position will partially be paid out of grant funds:'
QUALIFICATIONS:. Masters Degree in Sociology, Social Work, Social Administration,
or a related field plus 5 or more years (or equivalent combin-
ation of training and experience) in youth work, working with
• governmental units, legislators, and a Board of Directors..
Experience is also needed in' administration networking, public
relations, program development, data collection and research.
The position-also requires excellent written and verbal skills,
including public speaking, as well as the ability to meet people
- easily, organize time and resources. Motivate self and others,
and a sincere commitment to youth. -
DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES:
- Staff. and maintain a statewide network of youth serving agencies
(Minnesota Youth Intervention Programs Association).
- .Conduct needs assessment and research, •
- Analyze and interpret statistical data.
- Develop a comprehensive plan for providing service s. to runaway
and homeless youth in Minnesota.
• - Assist in the development of programs to meet unmet needs.
- Coordinate joint training events. -
(Continued)
b. OTHER RESOURCES
The Minnesota Youth Intervention Programs Association began in 1976. Youth .
intervention programs from around the State banded together at that time to en-
courage the state to c~et involved in fading intervention/diversion programs, at a
time when federal LEAA funding was expiring. The organization was successful in .
helping to secure minimal funding for programs and maintaining it during tight -
fiscal times in recent years. In 1982 YIPA began working with other individuals--
and organizations to encourage the state to recodify juvenile laws, and to create
• a Council on Youth to act as a forum for .youth issues and coordinate the vast
fragmentation of diverse programs for youth. Also during late. 1983 YIPA wash -
awarded OJJDP fading by the .state to do networking and training with agencies
involved in providing services to youth. As a result XIPA has sponsored•],1 local'
networking meetings, and is planning 'the state's first statewide conference~focusi~n9
on youth issues. There are 27 agencies who are members of YIPA. The general
membership of the association meets quarterly, and the Board of Directors meets''
~ (Continued) _
6a
21. a. (Continued)
- Represent the network to the general public, state, and
Iocal officials and legislators, prospective members, and
others.
- Work with the state, county, and local services to increase
the focus on the needs of youth.
- This position will require the hiring of a new employee.
21. b. (Continued}
monthly. The Project Coordinator of this project will be directly respon-
sible to the YIPA President and Board of Directors.
LOCATIONS OF EXISTING YIPA PROGRAMS
Blue Earth County
- Pope County
Stillwater
Coon Rapids
Moorhead
Ely
South Washington County
Little Falls
Forest Lake_
Cloque t
Edina
Roseville
Osseo
New hope
Monticello
Austin
Chisago City
White Bear Lake
Spring Lake Park
Minnetonka
White Earth
Maplewood
Todd and Wadena Counties
Faribault
Minneapolis - Z programs
St. Paul
i
STATE OF MIPINESOTA APPLICATION FOR ACTIOil GRANT
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ~ .
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM. PAGE 7
22. ~ DATA COLLECTION '(See Instructions)
Internal: The project will utilize a management by objective approach to. '
evaluate the success of the results of the project. The goals listed on.
page 4 are quantifiable and specific in order to enable documentation and
evaluation of the reults. Program updates will be prepared for the Board '
of Directors monthly, and program reports will be~done at least quarterly..
An Annual Report will be prepared. at the end of 12 months.
External: The. evaluation process will include soliciting feedback. and eval-
uation from network members, state and local officials, legislators, and
other community members. These comments will be tabulated and summarized,
documented in the Annual Report, and used for future planning.
This report will describe the networking arrangements that have been estab-
lished in the state and list the participants; it will show the results of
the needs assessment which was conducted,' and i:t will summarize the data on
runaway and homeless youth in Minnesota which was collected.. The project. '
' coordinator will~be responsible for all data collection under the direction.
of the YIPA President.
. .
23. COMPREI~NSIVE EVALUATION .(See Instructions)
Is a comprehensive evaluation component included as part of this grant application?
YES' ~c) NO
If N0, proceed to Item 24. Generally, a decision to exclude an evaluation component
will not jeopardize funding of your project; however, all first-year residential
community corrections pro,i.ects must have an evaluation component in order to be.
considered for funding. ~ .
If YES, evaluation materials must be submitted with the evaluation. Contact the
Department of Energy and Economic Development for the forms and instructions,
to be used in developing an evaluation component.'
a
STATE OF MINNESOTA ~ APPLICATIOid FOR ACTION GRANT ,
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELQPt1ENT '
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAb1 PAGE 8
24. DETAILED BUDGET :
a. PERSONNEL (Wages and Salaries) ~ ~ ~
Annual o of Hours . ~ ~
Position Title Salar~r Time' Per tleek Cost ~to Project
Project Coordinator $25,000 100 • 40 ~ 25,000• . ~ .
.Secretary $11,787 75 30 8,840'
-
' ~ .
_ Personnel. Category Total . • ~ $ 33 , 840'
b. FRINGE BENEFITS
Type of Benefit ~ Rate Base Cost to Project
F.I.C.A. 7$ $2,403
Workers Compensation .25$ 85
Unemployment Compensation .25$ 85
Health Insurance $200/mo. $2,400
• ,
~
•
Fringe Benefit Category Total X4,973•
. ,
l ~ ~ ~
i
STATE OF MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR ACTION GRANT~~.
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM PAGE 9 E
23• DETAILED BUDGET (Continued)
c. TRAVEL ; . . . . ~ . - "
Type of Cost Rate Base Cost to Project
Mileage ~ 20C/mi. x 4000 mi. $800
Air Fare
Lodging $50/day 10 meetings in out-state 500
' communities
rieals $10/day Same ~ ~ 100
Other (Specify)
. i
Travel Category Total ~ $
1..400
d. EQUIPMENT (See Instructions)
Item Quantity Unit Cost . Cost to Pro,~ect
Equipment Category Total ~ $
e. SUPPLIES (See Instructions)
Item Quantity Unit Cost Cost to Project
Ruled pads 10 pkgs. 7 $ 70
Pencils, pens 12 dz. ea. 1 12
Paper 12 reams 5 60
Stationary & letterhead envelopes 24,000 pcs. 900
Address Labels 8 boxes 16.25 130
Tape, clips, etc. Asst. Asst. 56
Envelopes 5x8 & 8x11 16 boxes 68
Manila Folders 5 boxes 12 60
Typewriter ribbons, erasures, etc. Asst. Asst. 74 ~
Copyset ~8 boxes 11 88
~i eio
STATE OF MINNESOTA APPLICATION FOR ACTION GRANT
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
~ PAGE 10
4. DETAILED BUDGET ( continu~c~)
_ ,
f. CONTRACTED SERVICES - .
Type of Contracted Service Rate Base Cost to Pro,1ect
~ .
Contracted Services Category Total ~ $ ~ ~ ,
- ~
g. CONSTRUCTION (See Instructions)
Type of Cost Cost to Project
Remodeling $
New Construction
Construction Category Total ~ $ '
h. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
' ~--Where Applicable--
Item ~ Quantity Unit Cost Cost. to Project
or Rate
Office Rental 200 Sq. Ft.?8.50 sq.ft. $1,700
Telephone, long distance & local 245%mo. 2,900
Computer. time rental 1,500- .
Programmer time l00 hours 318.75/hr. 1,875
Postage ~ 8300 pcs. ?OQ-804 each 1,840
Printing ~ ,
design & layout posters, artwk.,type-
set 4 $180 720
print posters 4,000 254/each .1,000
design, layout, typeset brochures 4 $180/each 1,080
print brochures 40,000 54 each 2,000
(Continued on next page)
Other Direct Costs Category Total' $
,
i. INDIRECT COSTS (See Instructions) ,
4 Type of Direct Cast RA„~~e Amount of Base Rete Cost to Proieot
~ ~ $
Other Direct Costs ~ .
bn i t Cos t
Item Quantity or Rate Cost to Proiect
Conference Costs:
Lodging -200 participants $30 $6,000-
. Meals 2 lunches x 200 $7.50 3,000
1 dinner 200 $13.50 } 2,700
1 breakfast 200 $4.50 ~ ~ 900
4 breaks 200 ~ 75~ .600
Faculty Honoraria 10 $150 ~ 1,500
Audio •Visual Rental 500
Conference Booklets 200 $15 3,000
1
_ _ ^
4 i
. STATE OF MzNNESOTA APPLICATION .,FOR. ACTION GRANT .
ENERGY ARID ECONOMXC DEVELOPMENT ~
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM ~ PAGE 11 ` ~
25. B UAGET JUSTIFICATION. -
a. APPLYCABLE PERSONNEL, TRAVEL, AND OTHER REGULATIO?1S, "All protect procurement, ; "
expenditures , and .accounting will be in accordance with. ~ . " - ` ; .
M7100.1B, Financial. Management for Planning- and Action Grants... In additions • , , .
1) Personnel cgmpensation and fringe benefits will .
be in accordance with the written personnel = ;
policies of: Storefront%Youth~Action
2) Expenditures of grant funds for reimbursement of
travel expenses will be made in accordance with .
the official written travel regulations of: ~ Storefront/Youth Action
3) Expenditures of grant funds for other project "
expenses will be made in accordance with the.
applicable regulations of: StorefrontJYouth'Action
k) Procurement of goods and services for the
project will be governed by the official
regulations of: Storefront/Youth Aotion
5} Ms,intenance of accounting records for this.
protect will be the responsibility of: Youth Intervention Programs
Hssociacion
b. NARRATIVE. Explain budget figures as requested in the instructions Por this item.
Begin your narrative here, and add as .many pages as are necessary..
Personnel: ~ . ~ . .
The Project Coordinator salary was derived after reviewing the United Way salary
survey, which is a survey of salary ranges from dozens of non-profit agencies in the
St. Paul area. They list a community relations coordinator position, which is com-
parable in responsibility level to that of our gropased Project Coordinator position,
with a salary of $25,000.
The secretary position salary also was derived from the United Way salary survey.
Two YIPA agencies have comparable salary ranges. Northwest Suburban YSB has a secre-
tary range f-rom $14,000 to $16,000 and Mpls. Youth Diversion's range is from $10,000
to $14,000. .
_
2. Travel
As explained in the project description, the'Project Coordinator will
visit communities throughout the state to develop networking strategies
for runaway youth.
3. N/A
4. N/A
5. N/A
b. Other Direct Costs:
- Office Rental: space will be required to ha use the Secretary and Projec t
Coordinator.
Telephone: $200 per month is budgeted for long distance calls so that the
staff can be in regular contact with programs throughout the state.
Computer time and programmer time will be used to maintain a data system
for the project as outlined in the goals..
Postage: This will cover mainlings to programs-all over the state to set -
up the network and the conference.
Printing: An integral part of the network will be posters and brochures
available to distribute all over the state to locations visible to runaway
and homeless youth and those who can help them.
Conference: The statewide conference will be the hub of the statewide net-
work. Since most agencies who can serve runaway youth do not have funding
available to send key staff to such a conference, grant funds will subsi-
dize the participants.
• b'~'cY1'1: ur• ru:~~,L~v'1'A A_~PLICA7'Iu~~ i~'urt ACTION GRANT .
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT '
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM PAGE 12
" ~ COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS _ . - •
ASSUMETION OF COSTS
1} If this protect is expected to continue be~rond the period for which federal funds
are requested, please describe efforts made to secure. permanent funding and results
of such efforts. IP the protect is not expected to continue, please explain..
The project is designed as a one-time effort to develop a network.of services to.'
meet the needs of runaway and homeless youth throughout the state. YIPA will ~
assume responsibility for maintaining this network once it is established..
2) FIRST YEAR protects should estimate the amount of federal and non-federal funds
needed to operate this protect during its second and third year of operation.
SECOND YEAR protects should estimate the amount of~such funds needed to run this
protect during its third year of operation. These figures should represent you~-
• best estimates of need: They do nvt guarantee such funds will be awarded.
FEDERAL FUNDS: Second Year $ 46,000 Third Year $ 30,000.
NON-FEDERAL FUNDS: Second Year $ 10,000 Third Year $ 20,000
3) Briefly describe the anticipated sources of nen-federal funds:
State funding through YIPA, private foundation funding ~
b. COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT OF 1966.
Will this protect, if funded, result in a change in the quality of
the historical, architectural, archeological, or cultural character
of any property listed in the National Register of Eistoric Places? ( ) Yes (x) Na
If yes, explain the anticipated effect of this protect on the prop-
erty involved. For more information: contact the Department of Energy
f~ and Economic Development.
c. COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM RELOCATION AND REAL PROPERTY ACQ.UISITTON POLICY ACT OF 1970.
Will this protect, iP. funded, result is the relocation of any person
or ersoas. ( ) Yes (x) No
P
If yes, attach an explanation of the type of relocation that will
occur as a result of this protect.
d. COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1966:
1) Does this protect involve any of the following actions?
a) New construction ~ Yes (x) No
b) Renovation or modification of a facility which will lead to
an increase in capacity.of more than 25 additional persons ( ) Yes (x) No
c) Use of herbicides or pesticides ( ) Yes• (x) No.
d)• Use of microwave or•radiation~ ~ ( ) Yes (x) No
e) Research or technology which may lead to the application
is the future of an action which would have a potential ~
effect on the environment ( ) yes. (x) No
P) Ether actions which might have a significant effect on
the quality of the environment ( ) Yes .(x) NO
2)' Applicants who respond "Yes" to any of the foregoing oust attach either an "Eaviron-
mental Evaluation" or a detailed environmental analysis oP the proposed protect.
' ENERGY AND ECO[vOMIO DEVELOPMENT PAGE 13
,t~iSTICE GRANT PROGRAM _ •
e. C02•'?LIANCE WITH EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY GtP_'D1LIItES
1) EEO Program; All pro,)ect recruitment and h=ring must be governed by a writt
Equal Employment Opportunity Program. If t'~e projject implementing agency does
not have a written EEO Program of its own, e.nd is not governed by any other
. ~ written EEO program, it should follow the EEO .Program of the Sponsoring IInit.~~
of Government.
' YES NO 'N/A
a) Has the sponsoring unit of government adopted a written '
EEO Program? ~ x
• b) Zs this•EEO Program currently certified by the Minnesota
Department of Human Rights?'.: ~ x .
c) 1. Are employment procedures for this project governed
by the EEO Progra~ of the sponsoring unit of
government?
• ~ 2.. If the answer to c) 1., is N0, are the employment
procedures for this project governed by some other ~ '
EEO Program? If YES, identify governing program. _
If N0, attach a.description of the process which
will be used to recruit and select project staff.
and consultants: ~ x
3. Zs the program identified in c) 2., currently
certified_by the Minnesota Department of Human.. x
Rights? ~
2) Certification of EEO Program. Each reeipiefft of OJJDP assistance must maintain
a .written Equal Employment Opportunity Prog=••am. In addition, each sponsoring
unit of government that has 50 or more enplayees and has received $25,000 or more
in JJDPA.funds must complete the certification form below, either-as_part of Ehis
application, ar before grant funds sire rele=sed.
I, (name of EEO Coordinator) certify that
(name of sponsoring unit} has formulated an
equal emplayment opportunity program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.301 et seq.,
Subpart E, and that it is on .file in the of~ice of '
(name and address} for review or audit by o'ficials of the Department of Energy
and Economic Development or the Office: of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency .
Prevention (OJJDE) as required by_relevant laws°~and.regulations.
(signature of EEO Coordinator) {Title) ~ (3ate):
r ,
3) Compliance. Has the sponsoring unit been cited for non-compliance with provisions
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended? ( ) Yes ( ) No. If yes, attach
a brief explanation of the nature and outcome of the citation, e.g., status oP
negotiations, settlement, agency placed in son-compliance, etc. Specify date
action and participating agencies.
~ . s"
A.
' :fn , . .
L-.
i
_ carrl,ll,tulVi~t rvn tiV11U1'1 liKEil`1'I
ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PAGE 1~
JUSTICE GRANT PROGRAM
--RESOLUTION OF SPONSORSHIP--
~ocal government•applications must adopt and submit the following or an equivalent
resolution. This resolution must be adopted prior to submission of, the application to
the Department of Energy and Economic IIevelopment. .
4.. Resolutis~n authorizing submission of the grant application and execution :of the.
grant agreement.
Be it resolved that ~ act as sponsoring unit of govern-
. (sponsoring unit of government)
went and grantee Por the pro,~ect titled ~ ~ to be conducted
(project title)
by ~ during the period from through
(•implementing agency) ~ (duration dates)
is hereby authorized to apply to the- Department
(:Title of authorized official)
of Energy and~Economic Developraene for funding of the project and execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of
(sponsoring unit of government)
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the .
i
of
(City Council, County Board of Comrai.ssioners, etc.) (sponsoring unit oP government)
on
~ (date) ~ •
Signed: ~ Witnessed:
. .
(signature). ~ (signature)
(-title) (title)
(date) (date)
•
•
•