Loading...
02-25-85 agenda CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 77 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Professional Services Proposals for ILN Redevelopment Study Council Members: The Community Development staff has interviewed two well qualified firms and has received their proposals for preparing the ILN Redevelopment Study Plan. The two firms are: 1. Bennett-Ringrose-Wolsfeld-Jarvis-Gardner, Inc. (BRW) of Minneapolis; and, 2. Burton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (BAA) of Minneapolis. The experiences of both firms are: BRW - Projects completed or constructed: 1. 50th and France Area Plan, Parking Plan and Streescaping; 2. Rochester Downtown Commercial Area Redevelopment Plan and Streetscape Design; 3. 26th and Nicollet Commercial Area Revitilization, Streetseaping and Parking Plan; 4. Calhoun Street Mall; 5• East Hennepin Commercial Area Streetseaping; 6. Milwaukee Avenue Historic District Mall; 7. .18th Street Neighborhood Pedestrianway; 8. Lower Nicollet Avenue Urban Design Study; 9. West River Parkway EIS and Urban Design Study; and, 10. Airport/Stadium South Transportation Element for Metropolitan Council and Bloomington. BAA 1. Oxboro Redevelopment Area Planning, Bloomington, MN; 2. Financial Analysis of Central Area Redevelopment, Des Moines, Iowa; -2- 1 ~ ~ 3. Future Land Use and Reuse and Frontage Development Along Six Miles of Trunk Highway 65, Ham Lake, MN; 4. Redesign for the Redevelopment of Cedar Avenue, Minneapolis; 5. Industry Square Redevelopment and Marketing Strategy, Minneapolis; 6. Opus 2 Office/Industrial Park Expansion, Minnetonka; 7. Downtown Development Strategy, Hopkins, MN; 8. Downtown Development Plan, Appleton, Wisconsin; 9. Prairie Lakes Business Park Traffic Operations, Eden Prairie; 10. Traffic Access Study for IBM Research and Management Facility, Rochester; 11. Central Business District Parking Study,- Minneapolis; 12. Hennepin/Lake Commercial Node Streetscape Design, Minneapolis; and, 13. Downtown Minneapolis Nicollet Mall. Availability BRW can complete the assignment in nine months. BAA estimates 9 to 12 months to complete the study. Cost of Professional Services BRW's proposal is for a figure not to exceed $44,500. BAA says the fees are anticipated to range from $45,000 to $48,000 (also, not to exceed $4$,000). The source of funds to finance the study are allocated in the 1885 Capital Improvement Fund, ILN Division at $63,740. The economic/market base data and study will be provided and conducted by others. Recommendation It is anticipated that staff will have a recommendation for the city council at the February 25, 1985 city council meeting. Re ectfu ubmit~tLed , yL John G. Cartwr' ht City Manager JGC/eja ! CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 76 Agenda February 25, 1885 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Certificate of Appreciation to Jennifer Gabrysiak and the Third Grade Class at St. Richard's Sehool Council Members: Mayor Hamilton has invited Jennifer Gabrysiak, a third grader at St. Richardts School, and other members of her class to attend the February 25, 1885 city council meeting. A special certificate has been prepared for Jennifer .Gabrysiak and will be presented to her at the February 25, 1985 city council meeting. Respectfully submitted, ohn G. Ca twr, ht City Manager JGC/eja . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager .Council Letter No. 75 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the. City Council. City of Richfield Subject: Administrative Report. Regarding the Placement of Air Conditioning Units on the Outside of Multi-Story Dwelling Units Council Members: Recently, council members requested the city attorney's office to advise them whether or not a city ordinance.-could be enacted that wou ld impose more restrictive regulations on the placement of air conditioning units on the outside of multi-story dwelling units. Outside air conditioning units are permitted by the state building code. The city attorne will re ort on this su b'ect at the Y P 7 February 25, 1985,-city council meeting. Respectf 1 submitted, John G. Cartw ght City Manager JGC/ej a > r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 74 Agenda .February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Appointment to the Sister City International Committee (SCIC) Council Members: There is one vacancy remaining on the Sister City International Committee for a three-year term which will expire January 31, 1988. Attached to this council letter is an application from Nancy Kilpeck who would like to be considered for this appointment. This appointment has been scheduled for the February 25, 1985 city council meeting. The organizational meeting of SCIC is set for Tuesday, March 5, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. R e tf ~ i~taed , ? ~ John G. Cartwright City Manager JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 7~ Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Appointment to the Senior Citizens/Handicapped Comission Council Members: There is one remaining vacancy on the Senior Citizens/Handicapped Advisory Commission for an unexpired three- year term. This term will expire January 31, 1886. Attached to this council letter is a copy of an application from Ms. Marla Carlson who wishes to be considered for appointment to this commission. This item has been placed on the February 25, 1885 city council agenda for council consideration. R spectf 1 y bmitted, . John G. Ca twrigh City Manager- JGC/eja C CITY OF RI HFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 72 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Setting Date for City Hall Open House Council Members: A very successful city hall open house was last held in the fall of 1983• It has been suggested that an open house be held again this year in conjunction with Employee Recognition Week. The Employee Recognition Week has been scheduled for the week of June 17. The Richfield Rotary Club is working on a program to recognize community volunteers and it may be possible to hold this event during this same week. It is recommended that the city council schedule Sunday, June 23, 1985 as City Hall Open House. The open house could begin at 2:00 p.m. and continue until 5:00 p.m. Respectf y submitted, John G. Cartwr ght City Manager JGC/eja l ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 71 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the. City Council City of Richfield Subject: 1985 Local Board of Review Date Council Members: State law provides that the County Assessor set the date for Local Board of Review meetings. After reviewing previous meeting days of past years, the County Assessor has selected the date of Monday, June 3, 1985 for Richfieldts Board of Review. It is recommended that the city council confirm the County ~ Assessor's selection as June 3, 1985 for the Board of Review. Respectf mitted, .John G. Car right 'I City Manager j JGC/eja r/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 70 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ratification of Master Labor Contract with Local 49 for 1985. Council Members: Staff recommends to the City Council, ratification of an agreement between the Metropolitan Area Management Association (MAMA) negotiating committee, and Local 49 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, which represents most of the City's maintenance employee's. The agreement involves twenty-two municipalities that, traditionally, have been involved in joint negotiations. The majority of the bargaining unit employees have approved the contract, and the City Manager's are now in the process of recommending approval to their respective communities. The contract which has been negotiated will cover the years 1985 and 1986. The agreement provides for wage rates for 1985, which includes from 38¢ per hour to 54¢ per hour for 1985 for all job classifications covered by the contract. This ranges from a 4.80 to a 5.01 increase in 1985. Wage and insurance reopeners have been provided for 1986. Other contract provisions remain in effect until December 31, 1986. In addition, the City is currently negotiating with Local 49 for local issues for 1985 and 1986. These issues relate to items such as clothing allowance, compensatory time, coffee breaks, and related items. As of this date, the City has been unable to reach an agreement with Local 49, and we continue to work towards a completed agreement. However, the wage portion of the Master Agreement will be implemented immediately upon approval by the City Council. When the proposed contract modifications and 1985 wages are viewed with respect to other 1985 City wage settlements, (Police Officers - 4.85, Fire - 5%, Police Supervisors - 5~, General Services and Management - 5~), and settlements of comparable metropolitan communities for other bargaining unit groups, they reflect a favorable settlement from the City's perspective. In addition, a lower rate labor classification which was instituted in the 1984-85 contract, continues to be especially important and beneficial to the City in terms of labor cost savings. Prior to the addition of the lower labor rate, a new employee would start at 90% of the Community Service Worker II rate (See example below) as opposed to the Community Service Worker I rate. Proposed 1985 C.S.W. II rate: Proposed 1985 C.S.W. I rate: $11.30/hr. $8.14/hr. X 90~ $10.17/hr. (Starting rate under old language) $10.17/hr. - 8.14/hr. $ 2.03/hr. (Savings per hour) Additionally, new hires do not proceed through salary steps as was previously the case. Instead, new hires remain permanently at the Community Service Worker I rate, or until such time they may be promoted to a higher pay grade. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, approving execution of this contract agreement with Local ~t9, and authorize the City Manager to implement the provisions of this contract. . Re pectf 1 bmitted, " ~ John G . Car wr igh~ City Manager JGC/eja cc: Administrative Services Director Community Services Director Finance Manager ~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF RICHFIELD AND INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 4g AFL/CIO FOR THE YEARS 1985/86 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Metropolitan Area Management Association have reached an agreement with the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 4g for the years 1885/86, and WHEREAS, this agreement extends the present agreement for one year and establishes wage rates for 1985, and WHEREAS, the personnel ordinance requires that contracts between the City and the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate bargaining unit shall be implemented by council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Richfield and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 4g for the years 1985/86. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Richfield. • Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 25th day of February, 1985. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Steven Devich Acting City Clerk .7 rYa yG; ~^ta1 ~ ~ --ssyy,,,,yy~~ a ~ . F ` ~ V 2 fYl~tro~olitan Ar~c~ t11~nQC~~mc~nt HJrocic~tion of tl~~e ~ win City !'~rE;:-~ February 8, 1985 TO: MAMA MANAGERS AND ADMINISTRATORS FROM: William S. Joynes, Chairman MAMA General Labor Relations Committee SUBJECT: LABOR RELATIONS UPDATE THE MAMA JOINT COMPENSATION STUDY LOCAL 49 SETTLEMENT i On January 17, 1985, the Local 49 members approved an agreement with the li MAMA Joint Bargaining Committee for a Public Works. contract which will extend through December 31, 1986. The settl~ent has four basic components and they are as follows: 1. WAGES PRESENT 1985 ao Maintenance I $ 7.76 + . 38 = $ 8.14 X969 Maintenance II 10.76 + . 54 = 11.30--~ ,t'.~ a~3 Maintenance III 11.24 + .54 = 11.78 y l~.g 2. DURATION OF AGREEMENT C~~ ~f,9 ~ ~ • Extend present Agreement one (1) year, through December 31, 1986, with negotiations open for WAGES and INSURANCE. 3. RETROACTIVITY All wages retroactive to January 1, 1985. 4. For any positions you might have between Maintenance I and Maintenance II, they should receive a 5$ increase. For any positions between Maintenance II and Maintenance III, they should receive a 54G per hour increase. Minneapptis Star and Tribune/Thursday/January 31 / 1985 .3M • ,4 U:S. sa s media y - earn.in s rose 5..4 • ~ out aced inflation • p Associated Press change in earnings from the prevI- ous year, continued to be service Washington, D.C. employees at ;209 and farmers, foi- Flell-time employees received meth- entry workers and fishermen at;205. • 'an weekly earnings of ;33T'ia the ` fourth quarter of 1984, a 5.4 percent The fourt)i-quarter earnings figures increase, from a year ago that kept come less than a week after another workers ahead of. failatloa,' the La- Labor .Department report showed bor Department ...r ~„•ed Wednes- that.major collecUvebargaining set- ~Y• dements-reached last year provided i ' first_year wage increases of 2.4 per- The department's Bureau o! Labor cent. • Statistics (BLS) said the fourth-guar- ~ . ter figure was:•up ;i7 s, week from The gaiastivere the smallest for pri- the year-earlier level of ;320. an vale industry since the federal ~v- .increase that .kept paychecks com- erameat been gathering the- infor- fortably. ter front of the, 4.1 'percent • oration 17 years ago. •They reflect a ..rise in consumer prtces .during the trend of moderation or reductions; in • same period. , ~ pay .involving .unionised workers in heavy manufacturing and other ;ar- The survey also stiowed Wat median ens of the economy. ' earnings of about 41-million families with one or .more wage-earaers in Another BIS ~ k ;.M .kit released fast the household ~ ~ ;513 between Friday, however, showed that work- Oet. land Dec. 31, up 5:8 r w,.,t .era covered by union contracts are from the yearearller level -oi ;485. paid an average of 5101 a week or33 .Median Ls the point at which half the •percent-more. than nonunion worst families earned more and ..half era -;404 a week for uni-W ieh~d earned less. employees ~.,,..:e.ared with ;3ti3• •a • week for other workers. The dispar'I The report said 56 percent- of the . ty between union and nonuniolt pay famllies had .two or more wage~arn- was even greater in =1984 than it had ' era and that their median combii?ed been inrg~ itt.i977 and 1980.':,,`' r pay was 5677 a wgek, twice that of - _ • one~araer families.; The bureau's statisttcs• oa week(y Among the other ~T°~ are. obtained from. its sur fiadipgs ,in the :re- vey of :60,000 randomly . setecte~ • port fo}~ the fourth quarter: ~ , households -and- .reflect how much • money afull-tirrie salaried or hourly . ¦Mnrried-couple families had meth- employee :made before : deductions an earnings: of ;568 a week, 8.3 per- ~ ~ ~-taken from paychecics..Tttetig- cent greater-than a year,earller. Six- ores .are. not- adjusted. for. season8l ty percent of :fDe .marrted•couple variations. famtlies•••had two or more people ~ - . . working, they had median earnings ~ r' ` of;698. . ¦ The median earnings of women ~~Y~d@~dS~ . ' were ;267, just 66 percent those o! ' men .at 5403. Among families main- Minnesota Power:- 69t, quarterly, tamed by a woman, mediaq earpings raised from 64t, payable 3-1-85. to , were 5290. - ~ shareholders of record 2-15-85. ' - The raise marks the 15th consecu- ¦ Median weekly earnings were ' dve year of ,increased cash dtvi- 5532 among white famWes, ;400 in ~dends, the company said. Hispanic families and ;381 in black Peerless Chain. Ca 25t, regular families.. The earnings of ALspan~c ~ quarterly, payable 3-1,85 to share- . fatilies went up 10 percent from the holders of record 2-15-85. yearearlier level of 1363. Black fam- BMC Industries, Inc. - i2t, regular Wes' earnings went up ~,2 percent, ~ ~-quarterly, .payable 2.20.85 -to from ~6• shareho_ lders of record 2-11.85. ¦ Among~managers $nd professional ~ - specialty workers, median earnings were ;494 a week, up 10 percent from the year-earlier Level and flee biggest percentage increase among ~ • • six major occupational groups. The ~ . - towest'oaving. grouos, with aittle CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA g- / Office of City Manager. Council Letter No. 69 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Authorization to Prepare Preliminary Engineering . Report for 1985 Alley Paving Project, C.P. 812 Council Members: In November, 1980, the city council established a policy providing for the improvement of the city's alleys by concrete paving. This policy stipulates that an alley will be paved only upon receipt of a petition signed by property owners representing more than 50 percent of the abutting footage requesting such paving. The alley improvement projects are to be initiated on a yearly basis, with those alleys not paved, or scheduled to be paved, being subject to special assessments for • the cost of ongoing maintenance. In the first four years of this policy, 59 of the city's 96 graded alleys have been.. paved as a result of the petition process. The engineering division has received four valid petitions representing more than 50% of the abutting footage requesting paving in 1985: Alley Between From To Augsburg and Garfield Avenue 70th Street 71st Street ~ Russell and Sheridan Avenue 68th Street 69th Street ~I Blaisdell and Nicollet Avenue 75th Street 76th Street Upton and Thomas Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Additionally, two petitions have been received which represent exactly 50~ of the abutting footage: Alley Between From To Xerxes and Washburn Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Queen and Penn Avenue 68th Street 69th Street The signers of these petitions have asked the staff to present their petitions to the city council. Last year, residents of the Penn/Queen alley submitted an alley petition representing 3$~ of the abutting footage. The council decided -2- not to order the alley paved at that time. The staff investigated alternative methods to alleviate a drainage problem in the alley. A survey indicated that the alley could drain overland without a storm drain if a permanent hard surface were constructed. According to State Statute, a 35~ petition is needed to allow the council to order a special assessment project with a simple majority vote. The staff recommends that the two 50~ petitions be included in the preliminary report for 1985 Alley Paving. The city council can then consider the ordering of paving of these two alleys at the conclusion of the public hearing, at which property owners could testify. It is recommended that the city council pass the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a preliminary engineering report for the petitioned alleys. The preliminary report will be prepared to be presented to the council at their March 11 meeting. The city council will then be asked to set the date of a public hearing. For the second consecutive year, the city manager recommends that the city council reconsider the alley assessment policy. With 59 of the g6 alleys now paved, and only six blocks of alleys to be considered this year, a program should be adopted to complete the remaining unpaved alleys. pect 1 submitted, ohn G. G rtwr' ht City Mana~r JGC/eja I ~3 RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PROPOSED ALLEY PAVING, C.P. 812 WHEREAS, petitions requesting the concrete paving of the following alleys have been received: Alley Between From To Augsburg and Garfield Avenue 70th Street 71st Street Xerxes and Washburn Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Russell and Sheridan Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Blaisdell and Nicollet Avenue 75th Street 76th Street Upton and Thomas Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Queen and Penn Avenue 68th Street 69th Street And the petitions have been signed by the required percentage of owners of abutting property necessary to proceed under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council finds it appears necessary and desirable that the city make the assessable public improvements of permanent surfacing of the above-mentioned alleys, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 42g; 2. A preliminary engineering report on such proposed assessable public improvement is required by law in the event that said improvement or any part thereof is specially assessed against the benefited property within the city. The city engineer is, therefore, authorized and directed to prepare a preliminary report of such proposed improvement and to submit the same to the City Council at the earliest convenient time; 3. Such report shall indicate the estimated cost of such proposed improvement, shall indicate whether such proposed improvement is feasible and whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with same other improvement; 4. Such proposed improvement shall hereafter be known and designated as City Project No. 812. _2_ q y Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 25th day of February, 1985• John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Steven Devich, Acting City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 68 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Resolutions Ordering the Preliminary Report, Accepting the Preliminary Report and Setting the Date for a Public Hearing for City Project No. ~ 80 Lon fellow Avenue Street Im rovements• and 3, g P , A Resolution Establishing a Financing Policy for The Improvement of Frontage Roads Turned Back to The City of Richfield by MNDot Council Members: On November 13, 1984, the City Council established a policy concerning the improvement of frontage roads in the city. This policy provides: • 1. That all turned back frontage roads be built to the standards established in the City of Richfield Street Paving Policy. 2. That the State be responsible for funding the entire street surface paving and the curb and gutter on the freeway side of the street. 3. That the cit throw h s ecial assessments or other Y~ g P funds, be responsible for funding the curb and gutter and driveway aprons on the city side of the street. 4. That property abutting the city side of the frontage roads be assessed for the cost of the curb and gutter and for the cost of the driveway apron. Calculation of abutting footage to be done as established in the Street Paving Policy (Resolution No. 4382). 5. That Municipal State Aid (M.S.A.) funds be made available to fund that portion of the city side curb and gutter not funded by special assessment. 6. That the city staff negotiate with the Minnesota Highway Department (MnDOT) to finance and schedule the . improvement of the frontage roads in the City of Richfield. -2- Z The city staff has proceeded using this policy in approaching the Longfellow Avenue proposed city project and the city council directive establishing the assessment rate for curb and gutter to be $4 per abutting foot for this project. The estimated average cost for a driveway apron is $200. The attached Preliminary Report includes the estimated costs and assessments for this project. The costs of the overlay of the remainder of the frontage road south of 69th Street to 24th Avenue is included in the Preliminary Report. The State will pay for all costs .incurred for the overlay being part of this project, including administrative costs. Since the November 13, 1984 city council meeting, MnDOT has informed city staff that they will pay only half of the total improvement costs for future frontage road construction. This policy will leave a larger burden for the city's MSA (gas tax) portion. The Longfellow Avenue project is not affected. At the city council study session of February 11, 1985, the city council concurred that the city policy should be altered accordingly. Since the assessments for this project will amount to less than 20 percent of the total cost required to sell a bond, it is recommended that the assessments be financed through the P.I.R. Fund. • Prior to the public hearing on March 25, the city engineer and a representative of the Public Safety Department will hold a neighborhood meeting to review the project and any other concerns such as speeding, truck and bus traffic issues. In addition to the property owners invited to the public hearing, those who have previously attended meetings. concerning the Longfellow Avenue traffic issues will be invited to this neighborhood meeting at 6:30 p.m. (prior to the March 25, 1985 council meeting). The staff recommends that the city council take the following action: 1. Pass the attached resolution ordering the Preliminary Report; 2. Pass the attached resolution accepting the Preliminary Report and setting the date for a public hearing for March 25, 1985; • _ ~-.3 3- 3. Pass the attached resolution that establishes the frontage road paving policy which reflects MNDot's policy to pay for one-half the cost of a frontage road including curb and gutter and the remainder to be paid from city special assessments and city MSA funds. Curb and gutter special assessment to be paid by owner up to a cost of $$.00/lineal foot. Respectfu y submitted, John G. Ca wr' ht City Manage JGC/eja • • ~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE RECONSTRUCTION OF LONGFELLOW AVENUE, 66TH-69TH STREET AND THE OVERLAY OF HIGHWAY 77 EAST FRONTAGE ROAD, 69TH STREET TO 24TH AVENUE - CITY PROJECT N0. 803 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Longfellow Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street by reconstruction, paving, curb and gutter and drive aprons and to assess the benefited property for a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and to overlay with bituminous the Highway 77 east frontage road, 69th Street to 24th Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 25th day of February, 1985• John Hamilton, Mayor. ATTEST: Steven Devich, Acting City Clerk • ~s RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION RECEIVING PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING HEARING FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF LONGFELLOW AVENUE BETWEEN 66TH AND 69TH STREET AND THE OVERLAY OF THE HIGHWAY 77 EAST FRONTAGE ROAD, 69TH STREET TO 24TH AVENUE CITY PROJECT N0. 803 WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by the city engineer with reference to the improvement of Longfellow Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street by reconstruction, paving, curb and gutter and driveway aprons from 66th Street to 69th Street and by overlay from 69th Street to 24th Avenue and this report was' received by the City Council on February 25, 1985• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the .assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $256,190. 2, A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 8th day of April, 1985 in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 25th day of February, 1985• John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Steven Devich, Acting City Clerk RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FINANCING POLICY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF FRONTAGE ROADS TURNED BACK TO THE CITY OF RICHFIELD BY MNDOT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDot) has established a program to turn back certain frontage roads along freeways to municipalities when mutually agreed to; and, WHEREAS, MNDot has a financial contribution policy for improving frontage roads at the time these frontage roads are accepted by municipalities which provides that MNDot share of the improvement cost shall be one-half of the street width plus the curb and gutter costs on the freeway side of the frontage road ; and , WHEREAS, the City of Richfield from time to time may seek the turn back of freeway frontage roads provided the frontage roads are improved to the standards established for the improvement of similar streets in Richfield. .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: j 1. The City of Richfield shall be responsible for that portion of the cost to improve frontage roads along freeways which are turned back to the city by MNDot in accordance with Richfield's street improvement standards as follows: (a) one-half the width of the street surface; and, (b) the curb and gutter cost on the property owners side of the frontage road. 2. Property owners abutting the frontage road shall be assessed for the street improvements which are the responsibility of the city up to a maximum assessment of $8.00 on a front foot or the actual cost of the improvements, whichever is less, plus individual driveway apron construction costs. 3. The maximum assessment to property owners on Long- fellow Avenue between 68th and 69th Streets shall be 4.00 er front foot or the actual cost of the im- $ P provements, whichever is less (MNDot has made an exception for this one block and has agreed to pay for all improvements except the curb and gutter on the property owner's side of the frontage road), plus the individual driveway apron construction costs. -2- Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 25th day of February, 1985. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Steven Devich Acting City Clerk ~I 7~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 67 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Establishment of an ILN Advisory Committee Council Members: On February 11, 1885, the City Council approved an interim zoning ordinance which placed restrictions on the issuance of building permits in the ILN area. During the one year effective period of this ordinance, staff will be working with consultants to formulate a long range improvement plan. It would be desirable. to involve people from the community in the planning process. This letter proposes the establishment of a community wide city council advisory committee. The committee would provide input to plans, proposals, and concepts which emerge from the planning process. This letter and attached resolution recommends persons to serve as committee, members, a chairperson and identifies certain operating procedures for the committee. It is further recommended that the study committee select the vice-chairperson. Names of persons to serve on the committee were obtained primarily from two sources; a mail solicitation and the Chamber of Commerce. In January, approximately 900 letters were mailed to property owners and occupants in the greater ILN study area. In addition to explaining the need for a restriction on building permits, it also invited interested persons to serve on a committee. Approximately seven persons indicated such an interest. Representatives of the Chamber submitted about fourteen names. Other names were suggested by council members and staff. A total of twenty-two persons are being recommended for membership on the ILN Advisory Committee. While the majority of the people are from within the study area or immediately adjacent to it, persons from other areas of the community have also been included. A city-wide perspective is needed because of the importance of this area to the entire community. - 2 - off/ Attached to the resolution is Attachment A. It contains a list of names of those people being recommended for committee membership and their association. The map also provides some assistance. The leadership of this group will be critical to the quality of advise provided to the Council. It is recommended that Mrs. Gertrude Ulrich be designated as chairperson. Mrs. Ulrich resides within the study area. She is also a consumer with a "shopping" relationship tothe study area. Her experience as a planning commission member and with other metropolitan area jurisdictions would also provide valuable perspectives and insights for this planning process. There is also a need to provide groups involved in policy formulation and implementation an opportunity to participate in the planning process. Therefore, it is proposed that the School District, Planning Commission, HRA and City Council be requested to select an individual who would function as a liaison to the advisory committee. Finally, to facilitate the smooth operation of the advisory committee and to maximize the amount of time available for planning the attached resolution contains statements related to its operation. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which designates the advisory committee members, confirms the appointment of the chairperson and establishes some operating rules. Respectf y submitted, John G. Cartw 'ght City Manager JGC/eja i RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ILN ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield has found that the formation of a new land use plan and program for the development and redevelopment of that area of the city referred to as the "Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet Area" is necessary to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of Richfield's citizens; and, WHEREAS, the formation of a plan and program should involve input from residents and business people; and, WHEREAS, input is best provided by an organized structure, hereinafter referred to as the "Committee". NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , 1. The Committee shall be advisory to the City Council to provide input to plans, proposals and concepts referred to it by the City Council and staff. 2. Meetings shall be held at the call of the chairperson or if not available the vice-chairperson. • 3. Robert's Rules of Order shall be utilized in the conduct of all meetings. 4. A quorum shall be required to conduct business and shall constitute one member more than fifty percent of the total voting membership. 5. Recommendations, if any, may be made by the Committee on the basis of a majority vote. 6. Minutes of the meetings shall be circulated to the Planning Commission, HRA and City Council. 7. Members are to be diligent in attending meetings. 8. The School District, Planning Commission, HRA and City Council may each appoint a non-voting liaison member. 9. After March 31, 1986, the Committee shall dissolve .unless prior to that time, the City Council has determined by resolution that. it should continue. 10. Members on the Committee shall be those persons listed on Attachment A, Section I and II. 11. Gertrude Ulrich is appointed Chairperson and the position of Vice-Chairperson is to be determined by the co mmittee. -2- 7- 12. The Department of Community Development shall provide staff support to the Committee and be in attendance at all • meetings. 13. The City Manager is directed to take the appropriate steps to effectuate this resolution. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 25th day of February, 1885. ' John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: ' I Steven Devieh Acting City clerk ~ S Attachm nt A ILN ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOMINEES COMMERCIAL AND CHURCH REPRESENTATIVES I'I APPLICANT ASSOCIATED WITH Bob Adelman Richfield Plumbing 805 West 77 1/2 Street Allan Anderson Emerson Avenue Congregational Church 7700 Emerson Avenue South Don Anderson Woodlake Barber Shop 7624 Lyndale Avenue South Tom Austin Dairy Queen 7533 Lyndale Avenue South ' Tony Doherty Doherty Furniture and Carpet 800 West 77 1/2 Street Bob Jensen Tandem Press 7716 Colfax Avenue South ' Richard LaMettry LaMettryts Collision & Paint • 500 West 78th Street Tom Price Colonial Lodge Motel 7745 Lyndale Avenue South Steve Sawitzke A-1 Foam Specialty Company 7608 Lyndale avenue South Larry Schneck Champion Auto 7600 Lyndale Avenue South Cor orate Mana er P g CITY WIDE COMMERCIAL REPRESENTATIVES APPLICANT EMPLOYER HOME ADDRESS Wendell Treichel N.W. Bell Telephone 7060 Oak Grove Blvd. 200 S. 5th Street Mpls., MN 55402 Mark Ahlquist Self Employed 1005 Rae Drive Attorney & Owner/Mgr. of Commercial Property 6448 Lyndale Avenue South Marty Chorzempa Richfield Bank & Trust, 9714 Rich Curve President Bloomington Attachment A ~w•• ~j -2- RESIDENTIAL REPRESENTATIVES APPLICANT RESIDING AT Helen Hanson 7632 Harriet Avenue South Judy Kerssen 701 West 77th Street Jerry Krause 7600 Emerson Avenue South Cindy Latham 7638 Garfield Avenue South Leon Lunas 7508 Bryant Avenue South Gertrude Ulrich 7601 Aldrich Avenue South Robert Werner 7645 Harriet Avenue South CITY WIDE RESIDENTIAL REPRESENTATIVES Betty Carr 6633 Lynnwood Blvd. J.B. Clarkson 6615 Lake Shore Drive NOMINATED BUT DECLINED TO SERVE APPLICANT ASSOCIATED WITH Elaine Bruggeman Gopher Studios (formerly) 7640 Lyndale Avenue South Dean Cross Warner Equipment 7520 Lyndale Avenue South Bill Wilhelm Wilhelm's Standard Station 7544 Lyndale Avenue South ILN STUDY AREA SEC. 33. T. 28, R. 24 SEC. 34, T. 28, R. 24 • 42 V 41 ~ / ~ w ~ ' WEEP r•TN 1 ) VI /tll !tl !ll /W i:// I... RW /I01 {nPE rIN !1/ ~ ~ 9t - _ _ ~1 NII IJV pL ntl ET~E`~ ~ 11 s V 11J1 NI.. INJ r aa- I ~ixr {I rn wl r~~ien'Inlal a~Inl~m t'inl. rf. _ 1` r J r _ J,l_l ~ _I_~(`~". r_ 111 T_ Yn _ W - itN ~ r 1 /n a aiJ >d' rz . 9- I I ~ N ~ IJp ? ar ar lai.. Iei 7 ril an. Nr. nn j a1J . rn _ _ fN rlif - bll JI Iro WI ae1 N) !JU !II HJI - ~ /al !W !b _ w., Q W - . 1 tII !bl / I 1 lel flll r /JSI MU ~ ltJl PJI ~ ~ • •nr /Ja .U4 ! l4r Nr ra wu j U/I _ _ yy _r J ia, EU" as ~ w _ . ' it fii~ r N ~ 1 D ' 11--~ t 2 . i)--... - • ul ~ w nn ~ ~~nN p i ap ~n pn . _ !t•1 /M/ N J aJl Nll a HI (tJl ~ f /01 ZI •aY ql till N ~ !nl OU.. a . -....M IJfI /b ¢ !A NI rNr art Or. . lrr pa pn p/~~ Inl NI RU tLl .J _ n \ ' • a S NI Np UI r !al Rb . Mel lJI1_ !il IN_ HI _ _ _ _ ~ - _ _ / e Jn n n ~ ~ rn - a I ~ au wr em on fau ur ~ .m . m Nfl uY ~ i n rmi r11 Ti.~ -m - al _ ril r1.. to rin - as Ini - yNf -im ~i- mr~ ~rai w mr w ~Iro mr N/r WEEI 1 !uN ~ ~ ~ _ _ 7{TN {SET ny IIJI WEl ?{TM IIIEl - ~a) N IL yl lYYI I /N pal NI al !W OIJ !9l ~~i~~~ py Y •n NI fkr 0W M/ {eN~ ! et Jr lMll I A I N IMI U IU ....1..,. n wl aye/ \ I . - . . _ Yfl aN - tlii J IMJI Jn P la1 a1) t51 .~U' y,. _ !IJ . ~ nI1 er I Ir. .fb .NO I ~I 1l 1 yrr ~l I rU .~~1 ! IU ltrl IMII RC1 ll.yl !MN ar11 ./ry ~{I \ Inl1 _ _ _ . _ !tll _ _ N _ _ _ Inx ~ !al -ari rew - i1n rn~ qvr a mt~a ml < frtl nH may - ~ wJ _ !m w Nr nn w ~ap nw ap_. _ m i f ~i l Jr Y6l f n 'Wnl rial »r L9 l~ 2 B 4 F- - ~ - $ B ~ ~ lYea~s ~ Ijl 2 g._ _ ~ dali f•U an w rVl rYW na fan nYU n! : / _ \ xx •I - fN n nln < lur 1 N < _ _ ~ \ rnn ae d w _wr _ w ` ' au ~ ur. _ _ nb 1 7Ya ~ rru 1 9wl ~ ~ ~ 15w1 ~ !ru 1/wl _ W fwl ~ =n IN.''~ J~~ ni fWr Ia aiiJ, ten ne nti_ ntr _ RHr~I oUJ an \ m- ~ ~n- i wl£flNy__ e{ "aa~liaau ~ a»`~mr y mr •a- fv ab nw- -Iwiml Irr ~ r1y - i 1 aU Nn Nb i fJa lw al rIN ^I r fU !.O ak fIW pw wn ~ rvn lNr~ " ~ / _ . lpr ! JU mN nW nr ! u 411 f N lypl Nn' \ In•1 ~ I I _ ~.....4 ....~1 ~ ~~.J IML._ !)n- ptn_ _IMI lal~ rnn ~flal br.. ONI Ma ~ f Oa nr au FNY p/I nn {N ar nI IM aN nn MIJ MJI IuV elN nJl r _.-1.. _ ~ rr ~.-~?.EE?.~~.Tfw/ _ ! _ r gTRi_: - r,,~~~. STR - - - _ .NEST ^ - - - '8T1 _ STNEET - - !M ! / !rl JJI VL ON VI IMr rYr WI ur ff•• I I la/ w N I W i ~h~ A ' , ~ _ S _ ~ ut1 O N /01 ftl • I ; 1__ 1. !cl pr rrl ter IN ny ~ fW na on. a/ !N a a._-MI.~ Ixv ra av al aa- al au - E- ' i I _ - p ~ . _ _ w rv r`NN JI f un ! JI fro ~ ar {n arl 1 an •r pn NY np nJ rer u wl na - _ _ _ _ _ i 1 I fr1 U Itl !l / a01 )1 VN 6r fa nn nl lJ11 YW !W nU p2f - - U.. .IIO.._ a^ l/n Ixr __3r1' - 3S2 ~ el8- . I< 24- a ( - 3[8 _ w7--~~ e~ _..89- ~ 41-- -~3--- atl m- - 1 al NI fb ar IN n Ixl Rr arl I It rnl as , rn on a I f11 fat pN 40 W OW nn fb '~3 Nr 0 Vfl al •N M) IMr ! ail 1U !V IY1 e0r ~ nfr 0n Mr 001 lln.. .(bl I•U ub au Ibl ~ N ar ~ nlJ . W i""f. _ _ _ . o r 30 rn up !nl , ay a Ru MI Irn ~orn ~.7~4J/- ~ a 21~: ~ r1•I nv an ' ur ~ ~ INi an { ~ !a - m - ,er. -!m ~aa rn V w f ~ ~ pl .w.~s:rErfsr~~ .J 3~. ~ rrcn • ~ii?.a<?~ ~i. e~.{•?? ; an _ - Y m _ ~ A ~1 ~ 2 rm al w an rxl rm an _ /n an _ I. w_ - + eW !m p `T. ab a / WE{r r77N _TPEET_ ___~i~ i __TM__- wc{ .T { . ~ ,NI m...- fnr E ~ G x k ~ 6 F ~ ~ ; E~B~ f ~ lu , ul ~ la url a aN W7 . m ~ ~ # ~ N - _ y+_ _ ~M'N~ wen _ rirn ~T11E[T .r _ 6 nn a. .2 A Say 4~ ~ 9 - - - - ' ~ 0 p rtn -.F In ey •u ~ / IW S R 4 @ ~ GI ~ llll 09 1----'--- Ia /{M ~il!{T-_ . / / _---YIEEf Yim aiEEI .ar WEE( ~ i . . 1, ...~...E:~--~ 1MI NU - \ wE•IIE'.~II/~IriE?.~.r.1~?.~?~?~' .~?II?.IE?_.}E!, _ r i- . - _._494: ~ - _ 43 44 I 33 ' 34 ~.yn fU bmbra.wmlYYeN ~n?n n.Y+~ry ruL./b/.rl.m J~.Meilnl a) - 1't'f avmerr ..r/w/•NNwlu U .x. A.nre .yMr. 11 /hrWn /Erb MvM/.YIJ I .1,~fJern K•.nr/ 1 lk efn (n•/N me Mys/,? n'•v LEGEND ' BOUNDARY ~ ' ~jp -Commercial Nominees -Residential Nominees CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 66 Agenda February 25 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Resolution Providing for Administrative Processing of Certain Licenses and Permits in the ILN Study Area Council Members: In December 1984, the City Council passed a resolution that established a temporary moratorium on the issuance of certain permits and licenses. This resolution required all applications for certain permits and licenses for the ILN study area to be acted upon by the city council. It quickly became apparent that this procedure was unnecessary for certain routine licenses and permits. The city council then passed a resolution to provide for administrative approval for certain routine licenses and permits. Both resolutions are now expired. The interim zoning ordinance establishing a moratorium on certain licenses and permits was passed on February 11, 1985• The purpose of this resolution is to provide for an administrative process to act on routine licenses and permits in the ILN study area. spec fu ubmitted, John G Ca twri~gh City Manage JGC/eja RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE PROCESSING OF CERTAIN LICENSES AND PERMITS IN THE INTERSTATE-LYNDALE AREA I WHEREAS, this council, on February 11, 1985, adopted a transitory ordinance entitled "An Interim Zoning Ordinance Adopted For The Purpose Of Protecting The Planning Process In A Certain Area Of The City, Regulating, Restricting and Prohibiting Certain Uses, Developments And Subdivisions Within Such Area", and WHEREAS, such ordinance in Section 2 thereof suspends the issuance of licenses and permits in the area described in said ordinance, and WHEREAS, Section 3, Subdivision 1 thereof authorizes the council to grant certain licenses and permits nevertheless, if such licenses and permits comply with certain criteria, and WHEREAS, the council desires to authorize the administrative staff to grant certain routine licenses and permits so as to avoid inconvenience and delay in their issuance, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Richfield as follows: Acting under the provisions of Section 3, Subdivision 1 of the aforementioned ordinance, the council hereby authorizes the administrative staff to grant licenses and permits in the Interstate-Lyndale area in the following circumstances: A. The license or permit is one which the administra- tive staff is empowered to issue in the absence of an in- terim ordinance suspending licenses and permits. B. The license or permit meets the standards required ~I by the applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. C. The license or permit will comply with the cri- teria stated in Section 3, Subdivision 1 of the aforemen- tioned interim ordinance. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 65 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the-City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Permit for Temporary Oversized Sign to be Placed on North Side of Godfather Restaurant, 66th and Lyndale Avenue Council Members: The Richfield Chamber of Commerce has requested approval to place an oversize Aorta-board donated by the Naegele Company on the north side of the former Godfather Restaurant, 66th Street and Lyndale Avenue. This will be a temporary sign honoring the Distributive Education Club of America (DECA) of the Richfield High School. The sign was placed on the site on February 19, 1985 after the city manager polled council members on that date and received their approval for this temporary oversized sign. This item has been placed on the February 25, 1985 city council agenda for formal council action. Respectf ubmitted, ~ ~ ~ John G C twri City Manager JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 64 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Proposed PUD Amendment to Approve a Minor I' Adjustment to the Woodlake Point Condominium Building Setback Requirements Council Members: The city manager seeks city council ratification of the city managerfs action on February 19, 1985, to approve a minor change to the PUD Woodlake Point condominium building setback requirements. Building Setbacks PUD Plan Revised PUD Plan • 1. From 65th St. R/W 4 feet 5.00 feet 2. From Centerline of Vacated Graham Avenue 44 feet 42.73 feet A building permit to pour the footings was issued on Tuesday, February 19, 1985. R ectful fitted, ohn G . Cartk~ight City Manager JGC/eja ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 63 Agenda February 25, 1885 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Permit for Illuminated Sign at Richfield Bank and Trust, 6625 Lyndale Avenue Council Members: Sign Service Incorporated has requested two advertising permits for the Richfield Bank and Trust site located at 6625 Lyndale Avenue. Both signs are to be illuminated ground signs constructed of plexiglass and aluminum. One sign is to be 6 feet 6 inches by 7 feet, and the other sign is 4 foot 7 inches by five feet. Both are directives for the Auto Bank/Nowbank. City of Richfeld ordinance code 3.4g, subdiv. 19, Illuminated Si ns rovides that cit council a royal is g P Y PP required for illuminated signs. The signs conform to all city ordinances pertaining to signs of this nature and it is recommended that the city council approve these sign permit requests. R spectfu bmitted, _ , ~,i(j John G. Car right City Manager JGC/eja . ~ - ~ ..,x~~ ' 1 ~ J Yr^rt-+v RI~~V~tF.) '~ia.L4[.L~f7QUtJ ti \nl~ t-'E u~vy ~i /.r r""vV ~ ~ - . _ ~ ' - ~ ~ I.•. J~ • ~ .rJ ~ ~ ~ D • ~ o ~ ~•u• o - _ ' tr((-t (TE r~c..t-r-~ rc7~ U ~ " v~:_,~: ~ cr~L-~ Gni?Y - bJ~+ i ~ y~~E ~ t E~t trJ N c' TAC ~ r? 1 T'~ y;,i R = ~ l iA? r t^r ? CD i7'~_f t•.r.) ~ ~ ~ F:. ~ lr~':i At_v~ w: ~ ,.i uv~r GPn; . r.JE"'_ ~t c rJ f'~i,_> X ~ ~kL i,A r{l1fJ+.? ~r` TLl ri 4„j,~riJ • -r 3 .r ; t , ~ - ~ ~ t _ 1 tt ,r ~S~ t ~ 1 2 ~a~ ~ t , r ~ u ~ ~r.- ~ ~ ~ ~ r _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F r v w ~ ~ ~ _ t V 7 N - ~ p . ~ a f - - w ~ ~ ' rJn •,.:.~WI N1t Er C~Py Pr!JD r~rr2-L~.vv..~ . I . .,..j.l>. P~Ll~3Ll~~rt-L-`7~/'f': :..L~.'~+vi~~i". k • ~ 3., ~ y" ALthra. ~3E PoL~~i• ~ ~ ~ - 4 { ~ . ~ ' . - ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~i f( - APPROVE ~I DENY - " '~/j/`l~,G~~~ITi•'( APPROVE DENY c~ - - Man' er Ins ect~r r it p Date z • , • o ~ Date APPROVE ` f DENY ~ : y APPROVE I ~ DENY Planning Department City Council Date IIate ~oute to above for special approval per code General Sisns APPLICATION FOR ADVERTISING PERMIT City of Richfield, ,Minnesota Date `5 Zoning Sign Erected - Yes No Fee Address of Sign ;j i ~ r I~ ~~1 ' ~t~~i l Proprietor Name DBA Sign Erector Address - _ .Type of Sign Design ~ .Weather Cover Lighting Wall Single Face Clear ~Lexon ~ Constant Projecting ~ Double Face Frosted Lexon Flashing Ground I { Multi-Faced Plastic Covered Revolving Roof I Aerial/Blimp ~ Shaded Traveling Pedestal I Seazchlight Neon ~ Zip Lite Changeable Banner/Penaants i Other Other(Explain) Temporary Portable Frame: Sign Colors Trailer ~ T ~ A ~ Post ~ Tf Illuminated - Yes ~ No Watts ~ectrical Contractor Address Phone Property Owner or his Agent Signature Phone Estimated Cost Sign Width Height Total .Square Feet Position of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utility lines, vehicle movement lines, or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions and attached hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page 2. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction plans: including specifications, list of materials, and explicit anchoring~or fastening details and a copy of the stress sheets, calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution, or activity conducted on the premises? Will the sign, structure, or billboard restrict any sight distance under, around, or over for safe access by persons destined for or passing the subject premises? r~ !C.t ; ~ li ~ ~ ~ G i' (~C, C~" - 'r C_' f ~ ~i ; % l ~i ~•~i~ r%% h~ r ~ ~i "Applicant s Signature and Title with Firm Date ' / % - . Phone Number ~i 1~;~ - ~ j ~ ~t 8/83 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN LOCATION SKETCH Sivert Hendrickson/Building Official - 866-5061 .°R t f R,:~ Aye ~,,,,;•(~-r,~ ~.~..I ~F' ~G'~`~(1j'~,~ t ~1 ,7 F-•-f.•e~ 6 F~~"•,,,~~,~-~f r~f~ M' ~~a fr~i ~~~~C11/P~.. . ~/s ~ ~l/N~t77/~l - l L~ .~~1S~1,1 ~ e GROUND SIGN PEDESTAL SIGN PROJECTING SIGN. WIDTH ~ WIDTH - ~ WIDTH LEGEND LEGEND LEGEND ~ 11 . Indicate Distance ~~1 +!t Fram The Building W W GROtINn WALL SIGN ROOF SIGN Indicate legend on the. K ~1IDTH ~ WIDTH the reverse side in the space below LEGEND ~ LEGEND LEGEND • GROUND V ROOF. Gf ~ r~ .r~ Place location of sign on this sketch with distance the sign is from property lines. Locate any traffic lights within 300 feet. DEFINITION: Minor Signs Single or double faced sign less than 32 sq. ft. on a common board ~ INDICATE ~Jtt~~-" l/,f~({..1 C.~ ~ ~ ~Ll-OG~ NORTH " _ LF~T/8/83 .~1.~~•~! - ~~1~~^;;("C: t'%; ~ i ~i'/~~~C~ (1 . J L.}(%il~(.~~I- ~ , r .J ~ ilni. t 1 t 1 -f ~ T' i t ~ rT l r I i' 1/ / CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager - ~ Council Letter No. 62 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of-the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Approval of Minutes, Tabulation of Bids and Award of Contract for City Project No. 813, Richfield State Agency Storm Sewer Improvement Council Members: On February 15, 1985, bids were opened for the construction of a storm sewer trunk line from the Richfield-State Agency property to Richfield Lake. Fifteen bids were received for this work. The bid minutes and tabulations are attached for council review. The cast of this project will be paid for by assessments to Richfield State Agency and Market Plaza. The low bid was submitted by Richard Knutson Inc. of Burnsville, Minnesota. It is recommended that the city council take the following action: 1. Accept the bid minutes; and, 2. Pass the attached resolution to award the contract to Richard Knutson Inc. of Burnsville, Minnesota, in the amount of $133,985.15. Respectfu bmitted, ~ U/ John G. C~rtwrig t City Manag r JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA _ / Office of City Manager. Council Letter No. 61 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield ..Subject: Purchase in Excess of $5,000 for Replacement of Carpeting at Community Center Council Members: The city council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, the aut-hority to purchase shall be submitted to the city council for consideration. There is one such item on the February 25 agenda. COMMUNITY CENTER CARPETING The existing carpeting is approximately ten years old and in need of replacement. Proposals for replacement of the carpeting were requested and the following four proposals were received: Daytonts Commercial Interiors $8,952.97 LaVan Floor Covering Co. $9,919.59 The Floor Store $8,446.50 Home Carpet $7,550.50 It is recommended that the city council authorize the purchase of carpeting from Home Carpet of Richfield in the amount of $7,550.50. This price includes removal of the exist- ing carpet, supplying and installing the new carpet, moving furniture and partitions and hauling the old carpet away. Funds for this project are available through Community Development Block Grant funds (CDBG). Respectfu~~bmitted, John G Ca twr ''g t City Manage, JGC/eja I CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 60 'I Agenda February 25, 1985 ~ I The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Award of Contract - Fairway Mower Council Members: ' On February 6, 1885 bids were opened for a new or used ground driven reel type fairway mower to be used at the golf course operation. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulation is attached for city council review. Three bids were received. Two of the high bidders, Reinders Brothers and Tri-State Toro, did not submit the required bid security thereby failing to meet specifications. A third bidder, MTI Distributing Company, submitted two bids: a 1984 model used fairway mower at $26,600 and a 1985 model new fairway mower at $27,995• Both units meet specifications. The adopted 1985 budget includes $25,000 for a fairway mower and $11,000 for a rough mower. Rather than trade the existing fairway mower, it is the intention of staff to convert the current fairway mower to a rough mower thereby realizing a cost savings. The two fairway mowers bid by MTI Distributing Company have been examined by city staff. The new 1985 model has no design or detail modification compared to the 1984 model. The used 1884 model has been used for only 95 miles, some of which were accumulated by city staff in a test conducted in 1984. It is recommended the city council authorize the purchase of a 1984 used seven gang hydraulic Toro Parkmaster tractor fairway mower from MTI Distributing Company in the amount of $26,600. ~ Respectf 1 submitted, ohn G.: C rtwr' ht City Manag r JGC/eja f CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 59 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Award of Contract - Public Safety Vehicle Council Members: The adopted 1985 budget includes funds to replace five Public Safety units at an estimated cost of $12,250 each. Under a joint purchasing agreement with Hennepin County, the city may make arrangements for purchase of an acceptable used vehicle as it becomes available through the Hertz Corporation. This procedure has been used successfully in the last few years. A four door 1984 Buick Century LTD has become available and is acceptable to the Public Safety Department. It is recommended the city council authorize the purchase of this vehicle from Hetrz Corp. in the amount of $9,450. Re pectf y ubmitted, . - t f ohn G Ca twri t City Manager JGC/eja / CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 58 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request to Reject Bids for Purchase of Hydraulic Bucket Machine Council Members: On February 12, 1985, in accordance with legal requirements, bids were opened for a hydraulic bucket machine with puller and loader. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulation is attached for city council review. One bid was received from Flexible Pipe Tool Company in the amount of $36,986 less a trade-in of $3,000 for a net total bid of $33,986. The adopted 1985 budget included $30,000 for the replacement of equipment purchased in 1967, fully depreciated in 1870, which is in poor condition and for which parts are becoming difficult to locate. It is the hope of staff that additional bidders may be located and a lower bid submitted. Therefore, it is recommended that the city council reject the bid received and authorize staff to readvertise for purchase of a hydraulic bucket machine. Re ectfu y s mitted, ohn G. ar wrigh City Manager JGC/eja 1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 57 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Resolution Proclaiming March 14, 1885 as the Kick-Off Day to Achieve a Smoke-Free Society by the Year 2000 Council Members: Ms. Lia Ozols, Chairperson of the Advisory Board of Health, has requested that the City Council consider a resolution proclaiming March 1~, 1985 as the Kick-Off Day to Achieve a Smoke-Free Society by the Year 2000. A copy of this resolution is attached to this council letter. Ms. Ozols and Mr. Martin Kirsch will be present at the February 25, 1985 city council meeting to speak briefly on behalf of this resolution. Re pectf bmitted, r, John G. Ca twri~h~; City Manag / JGC/e ja /v, RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION URGING THE RICHFIELD CITY COUNCIL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 14, 1985 AS THE KICKOFF DAY TO ACHIEVE A SMOKE-FREE SOCIETY BY THE YEAR 2000 WHEREAS,. the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Richfield is an official advisory body to the Richfield City. Council which is the official local Board of Health; and, WHEREAS, the Richfield Advisory Board of Health is charged by the City Council to study public health needs in the city and to recommend to the city policies, ordinances and programs necessary to meet these needs; and WHEREAS, the Richfield Advisory Board of Health supports the position of the Minnesota Department of Health for their recommendations to achieve a Smoke-Free Society by the year 2000; and, WHEREAS, an Onmibus Non-Smoking Act has been proposed to the Minnesota Legislature calling for (a) increasing the current 18% cigarette tax to properly reflect the direct health costs, (b) funding educational campaigns, and (c) banning the free distribution of cigarettes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Richfield City Council does hereby approve and endorse the goals of the United • States Surgeon General and the Minnesota Department of Health and the formation of a coalition for a Smoke-Free Society 2000; and , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Richfield City Council does urge the Minnesota Legislature to adopt the Omnibus Non-Smoking Act; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Richfield City Council does hereby proclaim Thursday, March 1~4, 1985, as the kick-off day for a campaign to achieve a Smoke-Free Society by the year 2000. PASSED by the Richfield City Council this 25th day of February, 1985. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Steven Devich Acting-City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 56 Agenda February 25, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Proclamation -:Honoring Richfield DECA for Outstanding Community Service Council Members: Members of the Richfield High School Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) will be present at the February 25, 1985 city council meeting to receive a proclamation honoring them for outstanding community service. A copy of the prolamation to be presented to the Richfield DECA is attached to this council letter. Respect 1 submitted, , John G. ~ C~twrigh City Manager JGC/eja . PROCLAMATION HONORING RICHFIELD DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION CLUBS OF AMERICA (DECA) FOR OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY SERVICE WHEREAS, the Distributive Education Club of America (DECA) at the Richfield High School is involved in numerous community services; and WHEREAS, these community services include an annual Thanksgiving Feast, which has been held on Thanksgiving Day for the past seven years, and provides a day of entertainment and feasting for over 100 senior citizens each year. DECA has an Anti-Shoplifting Campaign in cooperation with local businesses, the community, and students to make them aware of shoplifting problems. DECA supports and promotes the Free Enterprise System, and demonstrates youth leadership through their involvement with Toastmasters. .The Richfield High School DECA also helps support C-amp Courage for handicapped children by undertaking fund raising activities through the local Kiwanis Club. DECA members continue to be involved with their community by working closely with professional and civic groups in the city. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Richfield City Council does hereby praise and honor the Richfield DECA for their many outstanding community services. DONE this 25th day of February, 1985• John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Steven Devich, Acting City Clerk