06-24-85 agenda ~~3~/
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 252
Agenda June 24, 1985
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Special City Council/HRA Meeting Relating to
The ILN
Council Members:
It is the reccmmendaticn of BRW consultants and the city
staff that a joint city council/HRA meeting to consider the land
use and traffic circulation concepts of the ILN be scheduled
prior to the next ILN task force meeting on July 11, 1985•
It is recommended that the city council schedule this
meeting for Monday evening, July 1, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. in the
city hall council chambers.
Respectfu _mitted,
~L~~-
ohn G. a twrigh
City Manage
JGC/eja
i
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~p(
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 251
A enda June 24 1
g 985
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Recommended
Agreements to Provide for Local Programming
Council Members:
Richfield, along with the four other SWSCC member cities,
has been requested by Rogers Cableystems to consider a financial
relief package due to serious financial difficulties.
Amending and Relief Ordinances Adopted
Richfield, at the June 10, 1985, city council meeting,
approved the following ordinances to deal with the request for
financial assistance:
• 1. Adopted an amending ordinance to the franchise
agreement which is subject to Rogers obtaining new
financing by 12-31-87. This ordinance provides:
(a) four year extension of the franchise;
(b) cities may waive requirements to extend
service into new subdivisions;
(c) revised liability insurance coverages; and,
(d) the cost to be paid by the cities to purchase
the system.
2. Adopted a relief ordinance that offers temporary
reductions of Rogers franchise obligations to allow
for Rogers financial recovery. This ordinance
provides for:
(a) reduction of franchise fees from 5~ to 3~;
(b) cities may reduce the required amount of the
letter of credit (currently $50,000);
(c) Rogers may dispense with the $300,000 performance
bond (but cities can require one when deemed
necessary);
(d) Rogers will pay 1% of gross revenues to meet its
local programming obligations;
(e) a period of 30 months to obtain new financing.
-2-
Performance Agreement Under Consideration
1. An Overview
The performance agreement is generally intended to
provide a detailed explanation of Rogers' obligations
to provide local programming services. Also, the
performance agreement provides how the cities, the
cable commission and Rogers will participate on an
on-going basis during the term of the Relief
Ordinance (referred to above) to assure that the
performance of the local programming obligations will
be met. The agreement also provides for a procedure
to be followed to research the feasibility and need
for the proposed institutional cable network and
providing cable service to newly developed
subdivisions.
There are five documents which comprise the performance
agreement. The five documents are:
(a) The performance agreement;
(b) Exhibit A, Contract for Local Programming Services
(Personnel Services Contract);
(c) Exhibit B, Contract for Local Programming Services
(Facilities Contract);
(d) Exhibit 1, Public Educational and Government
Access Studio Locations and Descriptions; and,
(e) Exhibit 2, Public, Educational and Government
Access Equipment Locations and Descriptions.
Please note that Exhibits A and B are part of the
Performance Agreement and Exhibits 1 and 2 are part of
the facilities contract (Exhibit B).
2. Major Provisions of the Five Documents
The major provisions of the Performance Agreement are:
(a) provides for local programming facilities
(studios, equipment);
(b) provides for the personnel Rogers will furnish to
operate the local programming facilities;
(c) cities agree to contribute up to 1~ of the _
remaining franchise fee for local programming;
(d) cities may, after August, 1986, contract with
some other organization than Rogers for personnel
to provide local programming;
(e) contains a provision to establish a group to deal
with the Institutional Network to determine its
need and funding possibilities;
(f) contains a provision to deal with providing cable
service in new areas that are developing;
_3_
(g) Rogers annually will prepare a business plan so
that the cities will know what methods Rogers
plans to take to resolve their cash shortage and
other financial problems; and,
(h) cities may require Rogers to contract for a
detailed analysis of Rogers operating efficiencies
with an independent consulting firm if Rogers
seeks any modifications to the franchise
ordinance.
Exhibit A, Contract for Local Programming Facilities,
committs Rogers to keep two studios open plus a mobile
studio van whatever the cost. The studios are at
Hopkins and Eden Prairie.
Edina plans to keep their studio open and will make it
available to Richfield residents. The Minnetonka
studio operated by the Hennepin County Library System
will be closed to the SWSCC after a one year period.
Exhibit 1, Public, Educational and Government Access
Studio Locations and Descriptions, specifically
describes the studios to remain open and maintained at
Rogers expense. The addresses of the Eden Prairie and
Hopkins studios are included along with detailed
floorplans of these facilities.
• Exhibit 2, Public, Educational and Government Access
Equipment Locations and Descriptions, specifies the
equipment to be dedicated to local programming. It
does so by listing all equipment, on a studio by
studio basis, and, describing the allocation of
equipment presently located in studios that will be
closed. Equipment presently residing at the Eden
Prairie and Hopkins studios shall remain so.
Exhibit B, Contract for Public Educational and
Government Access Services, sets forth the programming
personnel to continue local programming (access
coordinators, educational access consultant, etc.).
Recommendation
The city manager recommends approval of the documents
providing for local programming.
pectf~ bmitted,
ohn G. Ca twrigh
City Manag r
JGC/eja
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
• Council Letter No. 250
Agenda June 24, 1985
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Resolution Approving Extension of Disbursement
Date and Approving Amendments to the Indenture
and Loan Agreement in Connection with the City's
$5,900,000 Variable Rate Demand Purchase
Commercial Development Revenue Bcnds - Market
Plaza Commercial Joint Venture
Council Members:
The purpose of the resolution is to amend the loan and
indenture agreements by changing the deadline for the
disbursement of $5,900,00 of commercial development revenue
(TDB's) bonds and to obtain a replacement letter of credit for
the shopping mall component of the Market Plaza project.
In December of 1984, the Market Plaza developers, utilizing
the marketing services of Piper, Jaffray and Hopwood, sold the
bonds to Cargill for a temporary six month period to allow
additional time to complete the financial arrangements in order
to market the bend issue. The financial industry refers to this
procedure as "parking-the-bond-issue."
The developers are seeking an extension from the July 1,
1985, disbursement date to a new deadline of August 5, 1985•
The extension of time will be used by the developers to
arrange for a substitute letter of credit from First Federal of
Minneapolis to replace the letter of credit from First National
Bank of St. Paul.
At one of the July, 1985, city council meetings, the
developer will request approval of the housing bond issue for
the rental apartment component. This will occur once they get a
bond rating on the housing issue.
City administration recommends approval of the resolution.
R pectf ~ubmitted,
John G Ca~twrig t
City Manager.
JGC/eja
NOTE: Copies of the Indenture of Trust consisting of 172
pages plus exhibits and the Loan Agreement consisting
of 58 pages plus exhibits are not included in the city
council agenda backup material. A copy for review is
available from the city manager's office.
•
S ^I PROVING EXTENSION OF
RE OLUl ON AP
DISBURSEMENT DATE AIJD APPROVING
ArLENDMENTS TO THE INDENTURE AND LOAN
AGREEbIENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY'S
$5;900,00.0 VARIABLE RATE DEMAND PURCHASE
CO~II~IERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS , "
SERIES 1984
(MARKET PLAZA C0~IMERCIAL JOINT VENTURE PROJECT)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
WHEREAS, on December 27, 1984, the Council approved,
pursuant to Resolution No. 6981, the issuance by the City of
its $5,900,000 Variable Rate Demand Purchase Commercial Develop-
ment Revenue Bonds', Series 1984 (the "Bonds"), the proceeds of
which are to be used to finance an approximately 70,000 square
foot building and related improvements including parking facili-
ties and equipment suitable for a retail shopping facility (the
"Project"). The Bonds were issued in .accordance with a Bond
Purchase Agreement dated as of December 28, 1984 (the "Purchase
Agreement") between the City, Market Plaza Commercial Joint
Venture,;a Minnesota joint venture partnership (the "Company")
and Cargill Export, Inc. (the "Bond Purchaser").
WHEREAS, pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of
December 1, 1984 between the City as Lender and the Company
as Borrower (the "Loan Agreement"), the City loaned the proceeds
of the Bonds to-the Company to partially finance the cost of
the Project. The Basic Payments made by the Company under the
Loan Agreement are fixed so as to produce revenue sufficient to
pay the principal of; premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds
when due. The City assigned its rights to the Basic Payments
.and certain other rights under the Loan Agreement to First Trust
Company of Saint Paul, iri St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee") as
security for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust
dated as of Dec-ember 1, 1984 (the "Indenture"). To further secure
the payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon and of the pur-
chase price of any Bonds required to be purchased under Section
2-18 of the Indenture, the City entered into a Remarketing Agree-
merit dated as of December 1, 1984 with Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood,
Inc., the Trustee and the Company (the "Remarketing Agreement")
and entered into a Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement dated
as of December 1, 1984 (the "Reimbursement Agreement") with The
First National Bank of Saint Paul (the "Bank"), the Company and
the Trustee pursuant to which an Initial Credit (as defined in the
/I-
Indenture) was issued. The .Council approved the Loan Agreement,
Indenture, Remarketing Agreement, Reibmursement Agreement, and
all other documents necessary to the transaction and directed
execution of the same.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, the
Company has determined to replace the Initial Credit with a
Replacement Credit (as defined in the Indenture) to be provided
by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Minneapolis and
to remarket the Bonds at a fixed rate. Upon remarketing, the
Replacement Credit will secure payment on the Bonds as provided
in the Indenture.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 5-4 of the Inden-
ture, no disbursements may be made from the Construction Fund
.for a purpose other than the payments of principal or interest
due on, or the purchase price of, the Bonds and certain issuance
costs, until the Disbursement Date, which, pursuant to Section
3-1(7) of the Indenture must occur on or prior to July 1, 1985
unless extended in accordance with the terms of that Section.
Pursuant to the Indenture, the Disbursement Date shall not occur
until such .time as the Replacement Credit is in place to secure
payment on the Bonds.
WHEREAS, the Replacement Credit will not be in place
and the Bonds will not be remarketed prior to July 1, 1985, and
consequently it is necessary for the Company to request that
the Disbursement Date be extended to August 5, 198.5.
WHEREAS, the Indenture and Loan Agreement each provide
for the amendment of the Indenture and Loan Agreement, respec-
Lively, to facilitate the issuance of a Replacement Credit.
WHEREAS, Section 3-1(7) of the Indenture provides that .
the Disbursement Date may be extended by the City at the request
of the Company and the Bank if the City and Trustee have received
an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that such extension will
not adversely affect the tax-exempt status of the Bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of.
the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney, the
amendments to the Indenture are approved substantially in the
form submitted and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
2. Subject to the approval of the City Attorney, the
amendments to the Loan Agreement are approved substantially in
th.e form submitted and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
3. Pursuant to the Request for Extension executed by the
3
-
. ~f~
• a d a a d on fil in the Office of the Cit
Company n the B nk n e y
Clerk, and subject to receipt of the opinion of Briggs and
Morgan, Professional Association, Bond Counsel, stating in
effect that the extension of the Disbursement Date from.
July 1, 1985 to August 5, 1985 will not adversely affect
the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, the City hereby approves
.the extension of the Disbursement Date from-July 1, 1985 to
August 5, 1985. The Mayor and the-City Manager of the City
.are hereby authorized and directed. to .execute the Certificate
as to Extension of Disbursement Date in substantially the form
submitted and on file in the Office of .the City Clerk.
Passed: June 24, 1985
Mayor
• Attest
City Manager
(SEAL)
-3-
Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the
City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota
was duly held at the. City Hall in said City on Monday, the 24th
dayof June, 1985,. at o'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:.
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
Res.
RESOLUTION APPROVING EXTENSION OF
DISBURSEMENT DATE AND APPROVING
AMENDMENTS TO THE INDENTURE AND LOAN
AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CITY'S
$5,900,000 VARIABLE RATE DEA4AND PURCHASE
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS,
SERIES 1984
(MARKET PLAZA COMMERCIAL JOINT VENTURE PROJECT)
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member , and upon vote being
taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against. the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
~
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF RICHFIELD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified Clerk
of the-.City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my
office, and that the same is a full, true and complete trans-
crpt of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said
City duly called and held on the date therein indicated, inso-
far as such minutes relate to extension of the Disbursement
Date and amendments to the Indenture and Loan•Agreement in
. connection with the: $5,900,000 Variable Rate Demand Purchase
Commercial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1984 (Market
Plaza Commercial Joint Venture Project).
WITNESS, my_hand and the seal of said City this
day of June, 1985.
(SEAL)
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE AS TO
EXTENSION OF DISBURSEMENT DATE
The undersigned are duly authorized to execute this
Certificate on behalf of the City of Richfield and First Trust
Company of Saint Paul., respectively, and do hereby determine
that the Disbursement Date as defined in the Indenture of Trust
dated as of December 1, 1984, between the City and the Trustee
is hereby extended .from July 1, 1985 to August 5, 1985.
Dated this day of June, 1985.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
Its
By
- Its
FIRST TRUST COMPANY OF SAINT PAUL
By
Its
By
Its
.
Msrtsaw.l Lawn Joesr R.Fllraalux i AW OFFICES AxDaae M. BoxD T.,:...:..,...~ P. Axosr
Goys oaluea Taotus A. L+tiaox g A I G G S A N D M O I3 G A N Mew $ Frsa Rasa: L. Las
Rostat M. Bowtx Deem J. Srffircas Rosser J. Pssrta Axx H........._:;
Faexa He........_ DexrRf. J. GOI3, Js. JoHx Bmrffirs T817D7 R. Ge5Tee20a0
J.I{sras DocoresLSaoa Pa~raSSIONALASSOCIATION JexasG.Rex EuzeseraJ.A.._.,....y
G. Ssesa MlcasaL H,J~~..,~.us Aresesa H. Nestor Gatooar J. Srexn/ot
. Svrexsox R. Scats Dav[ts TaaDY J. Hsla.e CaeaLes B. Raosas
sLVar, Ja. J. Psrarca McDenrr Msax L Intr. Ttass L S3Se
Ds C.:,,....,...,., Jottx B. Vex at Noara, Ja. 2200 FIBST NATIONAL BANS BUILDING Roeasx E. Wooas Pem M. Gerss
Joax J. M°N~rz Rrcasaa G. Mess Roaxx L Hsxstx Mean M. Dsasara
McNaa.V SaYa3ooa,Ja. ArmaswC.Beaata SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 56101 WtT,•,,.J.Josxrs RevuvA.Beao
JE33EY F. Botauar Jeues E. Nazsox Mslussaar S. SevsOE Mealex M.:...
Tsasrrce N. pons Jaaoxt A. Gass Batex G. BausLa Naxcr D. Aaxrsox
Rrcaeaa H. gxra Srava A. Baexa Taxi Sxeh.,.n.,~ MtcaseL J. McEu.lsrsaec
Joalr L.,........ Jots. H. Gorrnsxex TELEPHONE (612) 291-1216 Meat E. Scaeraxas Pem. S. Jecoasgr
Roxeru L. S_.......,~.. At.ex H. Msculr Mlcasar. H. Sraesraa
Petza H.Saea F. Sasw Joax H. Ltxasraox
Sexists. L Sexsox Mer7asw L Ltvtn TELECOPIEB (612) 222-4071 Rressaa D. Axaaasox
RoxsLa E Oacasaa Deem G. Gm~......, Ss,,. A. S..,,,.,,.., oa ..-....s .
Joax Taoxaa Dexter. M. Cocoal.ex Devta G. McDoxeta J N.,. Moazox
3.:.: Wtxxrca Deem B. Ssxn INCI.IID11TC3 TSE FOHMEB FIRM OF Harrca W. Moors RroassD E. Ens
Avaox L.Cc.~.,.~ Josara P.Nceoe Eatc Nrrssox Joax M.Peralsa
JoaxR.Esxtnca GaestesR:Hsnroa LEVITY, PALME$, BOWEN, $OTMAN & SHA.EE A...~....~~ R.;..,.......:.s SexozLH.Mosasx
Fsexa N.Gasaex
A. Le...,.....,:. Deets
Casasxca G.Faexa
June 19 , 19 8 5 Joax M. suLUVex
.VIA MESSENGER
Ms. Sylvia K. Bergh
City Clerk
City of Richfield -
City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, Minnesota 55423 .
David J. Kennedy, Esq.
LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy,
O'Brien & Drawz
2000 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis., Minnesota 55402
Re: City of Richfield, Minnesota $5,90.0,000
Variable Rate Demand Purchase Commercial
Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1984
(Market Plaza Commercial Joint Venture Project)
Dear Ms. Bergh and Mr.. Kennedy:
Enclosed in connection with the above-referenced matter
is a Resolution for adoption at the City`s June 24, 1985 City
Council meeting pertaining to extending the Disbursement Date
and approving amendments to the Indenture and Loan Agreement in
connection with this bond issue.
Also enclosed with the Resolution is (i) a draft of the
Indenture with all changes made since the December 27, 1984
closing underscored; (ii) a copy of the revised Loan Agreement
with all changes made since the December 27, 1984 closing under-
scored; and (iii) a Certificate as to Extension of Disbursement
Date for execution by the City.
I will forward to you the Request for Extension as
soon as it has been executed by Market Plaza Commercial Joint
Venture Partnership and The .First National Bank of Saint Paul.
You will receive this prior to the meeting on Monday.
8200 FIBST NATIONAL BANH B7JILDING 2.100 IDS .,,c.~.nH
SAINT PAIII„ MINNESOTA 66301 MINNEAPOLIS, ....u~..SOTA 66408
(018) 893-3213 (832) 339-0661
f~ l~
BRIGGS axn MORGAN
Ms. Sylvia K. Bergh
David J. Kennedy, Esq.
June 19, 1985
Page. Two
If you have any questions about the contents of the
enclosed Resolution or the changes to the Indenture or Loan
Agreement, or about any other mat-ter in connection with this
bond issue, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
. l
Andrew R. Kintzinger
ARK:ljs
Enclosures
cc: Peter H. Seed, Esq..
Andrew C. Becher, Esq.
Terry McNellis
Charles A. Parsons, Jr., Esq.
E. J. Plesko
Roger Derrick
Kent E. Richey, Esq.
Paul Lotzer
Mike Gould
David J. Kennedy, Esq.
Marcia Hanson
Richard D. Anderson, Esq.
Tim Sandell
(above w/copy of
Resolution only)
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~D-'/
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 249
Agenda June 24, 1985
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Presentation Regarding Formulation of Enterprise
Development Strategy
Council Members:
Recently, Richfield was selected to participate in a pilot
program sponsored by the International City Management
Association. A training session was held which was attended by
staff and members of the Chamber of Commerce.
Attached to this letter is the outline to be used in
• formulating a more detailed strategy. Bob Gunderson, past
president of the Richfield Chamber of Commerce, and currently
• chairperson of the Visions 2004 subcommittee dealing with
commercial development, participated in the workshop. He will
be attending the June 24th council meeting to discuss the
formulation of an enterprise strategy.
The purpose at this point in time is to seek city council
approval and support for the city staff involvement in this
project. It is recommended that the city council approve this
resolution. There is no funding request at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
John G. C tw •ght
City Manager
JGC/eja
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LOCAL ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, Richfield was selected to participate in a pilot
local enterprise development program sponsored by the
International City Management Association; and,
WHEREAS, the Chamber of Commerce is the lead organization
for•the implementation of the Visions 2004 goals which include
the goal for commercial development; and,
WHEREAS, members of the city staff and representatives of
the Richfield Chamber of Commerce attended an ICMA workshop on
this program in Washington, D.C. to formulate an action plan;
and,.
WHEREAS, the goals of this action program are:
1. To redefine the image of Richfield so that the
community is more- receptive to change, especially
allowing for commercial expansion and changing the
land use mix and intensity•
2. To increase the awareness, understanding and
recognition of the need for:
(a) enhancement of tax base
(b) community strengths -
(c) prospective new client groups
3. To reach an agreement about what areas are suitable
for redevelopment and determine potential of a
redevelopment plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Richfield does recognize that this project has great
significance to the future economic wellbeing of Richfield
and does support the City of Richfield~s involvement
in this project including financial support, provided that
all budgets for the project be submitted to the city council j
for review and approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council also pledges
its continued cooperation and involvement with the Richfield
Chamber of Commerce in this endeavor.
-2- ~Q
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, this
24th day of June, 1985.
John Hamilton Mayor
- ATTEST:
Thomas Ferber City Clerk
i
/ O
_ 21,L~.1~ r !+.i.];~~ KKT.HHZ~ESOT.A
~ ACTION PLAN
I.' Define aroblem to be adder^sssed by action plan
1. .Redefine "function/iatage" of Richfield. intern=i7y and externally so
that: the community is mare receptive to change.. This. needs to be
done partim~~=*ly in regards to allowing for cammercial expansion sad
for changing the land use mix-and intensity.
II. Goals of action plan
Z. To increase the aw-areaess, understanding and recognition of the seed
for:
a. Enhancement.. of Tax 3ase --S.ateraal ,
b. Coma¢unitp Strengths - Internal/External
c. Prospective Hess "client soups" - External
III. Defiers vb.iectives to be reached
-1. Organize a "fast base" that would explain need for:. improved land
use mix and intensity and more new invest:aent.
Z. Determine. haw best. to involve citizens/business commuunity.
a. This can be accomplished by~creating a tax base that is
comprehensible for c~,,,.~,saity.
b. Need_ta reach an, agreement-about what areas are suitable for.
redevelopment (i.e., Strip ~9~).
c. Determine potential of redevelopment plan:.
- Draft a plan to specify commercial a~as boundaries for
_ e:cpansion
~ - rWY area development plan :=ah-commercial potential
d. Nesd to detail. planning (e. g. I.L.L~ is needed..
IV. Define specific strategies to used in imnlementin~ ob.iectives
1. Develop budget., identify dollars and possibly seek external. funding.
2. Work with Planning Commission (sta._~'f has facts that are Headed).
.
. _
8. Senior citizens, school districts, others.
r .
9. Exte,^na1. Funding. For example, a foundation with similar interests
we would have to send proposal.
11. Adm~.nistrative mechanism .how is this going to happen?
12. Get university to do Lichfield's Action Plan as a "case study."
PI. List action steps Timetable
Task l:
Validate problem, define with key May 9 (Vision meeting)
groups, get blessing on agenda of
calendar; Vision 200; Planning
Commission; Chamber; City Coune.i., FT.rZ.S.
Task 2: .
Estab~iGh Administrative/Coordinate By June 1
groups -Sob's Committee. Supplement
with others (need legislation).
Task. 3:
Determine/Draft Budget Bp 3rd week of May
Hruce and pe„^{~
Task 4:
Administrative:Group will put together July 1
schedule Action P~'^.
.
-3-
/0-~
7. Bi11 Schweke
Corporation for Enterprise Development
1725 ~ Street, N.W.
Suite 1401
Washington, D.C. 20006
(202) 293-7963
8. Paul L. Pryde, Jr.
Pryde, Roberts and Company
1275 ~ Street, N.W.
• Suite 900
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 371-0688
National Resource Persons:
James D. Vitarello
Industry Specialist
Customer and Industry Affairs Division
Comptroller of the Currency
490 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W.
Washington, D.C.. 20219
(202) 287-4169
James Lowed
Community Affairs CDordinator
Division of Consumer and Community Affairs
Federal Reserve System
Washington, D.C. 20551
(202) 452-3378
r
-2-
CITY OF RICHFIELD,
MINNESOTA
Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 248
Agenda June 24, 1985
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Public Hearing and Second Reading, Transitory
Ordinance Providing For The Disposition of Real
Property at 6636 Cedar Avenue and 1825 East 66th
Street (Municipal Liquor Store Site)
Council Members:
The public hearing and second reading of the transitory
ordinance for the disposition of the above identified property
was first scheduled for the May 13, 1985, City Council meeting.
The hearing has been continued for two council meetings.
Negotiations are continuing. However, because they have not yet
been concluded, it is appropriate at this time to cancel the
r hearing and second reading. Once negotiations are completed
with the developers, the transitory ordinance process will be
started over again.
It is recommended that the public hearing and second reading
of the transitory ordinance for the sale of city owned property
at 66th Street and Cedar Avenue be cancelled.
Respectfully submitted,
John G. Cartwright
City Manager
JGC/eja
f
r
. ~ ~f
-S ~
TRA:iSITORY ORDI?i?.iICE '~0.
- _
A TAA?ISZTORY ORDI`~~NCE PROVIDI`IG OR -
THE DSSPOSZTZO~i OF' GcRTAI~~ REAL -
- PROPERTY LOOTED AT bb36 _ CEDAR ?'IE'~UE
` - - SOUTK A;iD 1325 EAST 66TH ST:~EET
City of`RichfieZd Does Ordain:.
_ _ Section 1. Tne faZ?a~ring property af~the City is hereby au-
thorized to be saZd or otherwise disposed of: ~
Ci) -Lots 1 through 10T Slack- 1, 'Nexler's addition, accord-
- ing to the recorded. prat thereof.
C2}: That part of
~ she East 1/2 of the Nort;neast 1/4 of the
yartheast 1/~ o£ the Southeast 1/~ of Section 25,
_ Township 28 .North, Range 2~4 t West_ of the 4th Principal.
Meridian Lying. ;forth a.f the South. X30 meet thereof, and
-East of the West 125 feet thereof, according to the
'`United: States Goverment Survey thereof and situated in
Kenriepin County, t~iinr.esota_
Sect.iaa 2_ S"uch:~ property ^aY ~3er said ar otherwise disposed of
by the City pursuant to and irs accordance with a resolutior.
adopted. by the City Caunci2 _ .
Passed- by~the City Council of the City of Richfield.,
Mirnesotat this d'ay of `
~Sahn. N . ianiltan , Mayor
ATTEST
Tam. c-erber, Gity Glerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA ~ ~ /
° Office of City Manager
Council Letter No. 247
Agenda June 24, 1985
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Amendment to the PUD Ordinance to Create a Planned
Two Family Dwelling District.
Council Members:
At the June 10, 1985, city council meeting, the council
gave first reading to an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance
to create a planned two family district.
Attached for council consideration is the proposed ordinance
• amendment recommended by the Planning Commission and the
community development department staff, which creates a planned
two family dwelling district. The ordinance amendment adds
language to the existing PUD ordinance (Section 3.34A) so
that planned two family residential districts (PMR-1) can be
created. The ordinance amendment also provides that uses
permitted in a PMR-1 two family residential district are those
uses permitted in the "R" and "R-1" single family residential
districts and the "MR-1" two family residential districts. The
density of two family dwellings in a PMR-1 district cannot
exceed 10 dwelling units per acre. This is the same density
limitation allowed in the existing MR-1 district. All other
provisions of the PUD ordinance remain intact and any proposed
development would be subject to the applicable provision of the
ordinance.
It is recommended that the city council conduct a public
hearing and give second reading approval to the attached
ordinance.
Re ectfu y omitted,
~
ohn G. Car wrigh
City Manager
• JGC/eja
1. Saction 3:34, Subdivision 2, Pararo ann ~ is Winded to read ?.s follows:
of Planned Unit ~evelocments; allowed Uses.
(a TY~re shall ce ~ ~ siX 1 types of planr:ed ~.rsi t develop~t
districts, viz:
Pursed Singi~ c2.~is.y Residential (PR)
~Plarred `TM~ra rami_ly Residential (P"^R-1)
Planned. Multiple Residential (P!~R)
Planned Neigrbortood Comercial (PC-1)
- Planned C-~:erai Commercial (_~C-?~
Planned i~^~ustri=l (PI)
(b) Uses allowed in a PUD district stall ce as ::allows:
Uses allowed in an "R" or "R-1 " district stall ce allowed in a PR
district.
Uses allowed i.~ an "R", "R-1 " or "MR-1 " district stall t~ allowed
• in a P.MR-1 provided t<~'at der~ity of 2 family dwellings stall
not e~cczed 10 dwelling ~av.ts ~r acre . j
US2S allowed i.t2 a rt~rr ~ rrn'tA-1 rc t rt:~_7n or n~-3" distrl.Ct stall
allowed in a P.'~R district..
Uses allowed i+n a "C-1 " district stall ce allowed in a PC-1 .
district.
` • Uses allowed in a "C-2" district stall ~ allowed in a PC-?
district.
Uses allowed ~ an "1'." d~
~ Zct sta ? 1 ~ allowed 321 3 PI d str i Ct .
(C'. ~ U52S ot~1@,r' w~.3I1 t.`~ petal. tJwd 1.L52S, 3s ~ is t.°d aLOV2, 3I'~ allCwed
in a r~JD di~~liC.. 'Jr'JVlded ~.e use i5 wt.iCh is auL..OL`i.Z°d .-1
or.s of t.~ ~ ~ six j tyrzs of PUD districts, and orcvidcd *~.rt::er
mat suc.~ addi tioral use :
anrot ecc~y ire ~:an » ~rcant of ~~:e
mss floor area of t:.e PC.JD district.
?assed `.r.i.s day of 1985 by t`~~ City Cour!cil of t.~:e City of
R.ic:~,field.
Jots :amiZCn, ;`~.ayor
'i:.cmas ~cercer, C;.:er_~s •