Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05-13-85 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 196 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Community Theatre Production of Barefoot in the Park Council Members: The Richfield Community Theatre organization will have two cast members appear at the city council meeting to help promote the Barefoot in the Park production. The plan is to have the two players with the leading roles give a brief performance by running through a few lines from one of the scenes. The persons appearing and their roles are: Jade Keiner as Corie Bratter Paul Keller as Paul Bratter The presentation will end with an invitation to the city council and audience to attend one of the June performances (June 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, and 16) . Respectf~y ubmitted , ohn G. Ca twri .t City Manage JGC/eja ay-r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 195 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorab7.e Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Architectural Services for City Hall Remodeling Council Members: The 1984 and 1985 Capital Improvement Budgets provide for improvements to be made to the City Hall lobby and licensing facilities. The initial step to secure the services of an Architectural Consultant to provide design plans, cost estimates, develop contract documents, issue and review bids and observe installation was taken in 1983. The Architectural Alliance firm was selected by the City as the architect on the recent Public Safety addition to City Hall. In 1983, at the end of the Public Safety project, Architectural Alliance was selected by the City to prepare an interior design study, floor plan and cost estimates for upgrading the City Hall licensing and lobby areas. This assignment was completed in 1984. Since 1984, a series of events occurred that delayed implementing the project. The original plan did not meet handicapped accessibility regulations. Staff has shifted the water and sewer billing office to the west side of the finance division to make it possible to add more floor area to the licensing area project. City staff turnover in the Administrative Services Director and City Clerk positions have also added to the delays in this project. The project is being staged in two or three separate phases which will ensure that the major components of the remodeling may be completed in 1985 while remaining within the $65,000 allocated for the project through 1985. It is anticipated that the remaining portion of the project will cost approximately $35,000 more,for a total estimated project cost of $100,000, which will be completed in 1987• Architectural Alliance h licensing area site inspection plus customary etc. and take the stage for a reimbursables as proposed to redesign the project through the construction total cost not to exceed $7,900, for printing, travel, postage, ,. a Y-.z. The total cost for architectural services is approximately 10~ of the estimated project cost, which is usual whey. costing architectural consulting fees. This 10~ includes the cost of $2,500 incurred by the city for the original design ir. 1983-84. Because Architectural Alliance has been involved with this project since 1983 and it is desirable to proceed with this project immediately to avoid further delays, the City did not seek additional proposals for the redesign of the licensing project, but rather is recommending that we continue the services of the current consultant. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Architectural Alliance for an amount not to exceed $7,900, plus normal reimbursables for consulting services for the City Hall licensing remodeling project. Respectfully submitted, John G. Cartwright City Manager JGC:sb Archite ctural 1-~1llance 40C Clrfton Avenue South. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55403 (612) 871-5703 Architecture • Planning • Interior Design • Energy Design Mr. Steve Devich Director Administrative Services City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 May 9, 1985 Dear Steve: aY-3 REC~i~I~D ~A'~ i Q 995 i Per your request we have enclosed a Schedule of Events for the Licensing Division Remodeling Project and we are submitting the hourly billing rates for the following individuals that will be working on the project. Project Manager $51.07 Project Interior Designer $27.34 Project Architect $32.00 Please call if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, ~• ~~/~ 1 SHARRY C00 E Associate Director/Interiors SC/bfr cc: Dehnert Ketcham Ellsworth ~~~ ~~' C~ ~ ,!~ n r~~J~ t ~ ~. Minneapolis/Saint Paul • Twin Cities International Airport • Phoenix O~ ,--~~ o•-• o~ o~~ S c-h V7 c-t fD ct (D c-r !D fD t-+ N CD cn (D < (D < (D < < (D J N' ~ CD O !D ~ ~ O "D S "O ~ < O C 'S O (!~ (D ~ O (D CD N C~ N ~7 ~ < f n ~..~ ~ ~} J• (D a~ < -s ~n r ~. ~ ~ a ~ J ~ D C'f d ~G (D rr G ~ O n ~ .~. CO ~ O c+ ~. O ~• O N ~ '~ ~ d ~' ~ C ~ m co !D N O ~ ct <"M' ~ ~. N N ~ ~ fi CD N m i-~ N N F-+ N V) N ~.y. ~ (D CD CD fD ~ ~D fD (D fD fD ~ ~p 7c' 7~ x ~ c+ 7C N N ~ N (D N ~ ~ ~ O_ .... 01 01 Ol ~. CP -~ V V ~ N ~ `-+ W V ~ N ~. ~ CO J~ O ~ O CD ~ ~ \ C.T1 \ CO b ~ I CO C/1 cn cn cn rn csi n i < < ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ rn v cs ro O ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ C31 N O~ W O N ~ r--. U'i t-+ ~ ~! CO \ \ CD ~ O W Cp CJ~ CJ'1 CTt o m -f~ N C"}. -~ ~. o ~ ct p, ~ ~ r* O N ~-' W W _' ~ O O O c.Jl CT O O_ 0 0 ~ o 0 0 ~ ,~ Z O ~ .~ fD n n ~ fi O fi O ro 64 {R ~ ~l ~-+ N N N cV ~ ~-h l0 CJ1 ~l ~l W ~ ~' O O~ ~D 01 O O O O Ul cT~ O ~ O O O O O O (D O O O O O O ~- a~-~ C./) !D CD c"f' Sv a r+- r N rF -+• ~ ~ n n (D J. ~' ~ 7 (~ N {~ J. O 7 Z "~ O ~ 'S (/~ fy O n O C") -~• O N < ct O cn d j. ~C O ~ C N ~_.~.0 -h CD O -fi O Q ~ ~ A~ O ~ cti-fiTJ ~• ~D CD ~D n n~ o_ m ~ ~ ~ < o -n O" ~ CD Q ~. ~ ~ [D CD Z V N ~. d O ~ O v. ~ c0 fD Cn n ~ <--r ~, ~ O O ~ Z v. S ~ ~ a n N (p c'+ (~ ("t' v a Architectural Alliance 40o cm~n sue sue,. ~. . ~~ 8~-S~xi Architecture • Planning • Interior Oesign • Energy Design Mr. Steve Devich;. . Director Administrative.Services ~ ~~ C.ityof,Richfield a- s ,r.. ~ ~~ ^., 6700 ,:Portland Avenue ~} ,a ~, ~ , „. ~ , . ~~ , Richfield, Minnesota 55423 = "~'~~r '' ,u ;.s ~ , Apra i ~ 17, 1985 ~.f ~~ ~,; , . Y: ;.: .; ~:~; Re:: Proposa~7 for Professional Design Services . ;,. Dear Steve: `~ ,. ;.; Architectural Alliance is ~ple,ased.to submit this Proposal remodeiing~of the Licensing Division 'of"the City of Richfield. ~- d ^ S F e -. .4 , . ,: for the Based on several meetings with you and your staff, we have outlined the scope of the project as we now see it and have estimated fees for your consideration. 1. Revise Space Requirements/Develop New Layouts Inventory recently acquired existing furnishings and confirm departmental space requirements. Develop new layouts for furnishings, telephone/electrical and lighting systems. Confirm color and material selections. 2. Develop Revised Cost Estimates Based on approved final layouts and the established 1985 Budget of 565,000 for Remodeling and Professional Design Services, a revised cost estimate will be developed prioritizing the work to be performed in this year's budget. 3. Develop Contract Documents As-built drawings of existing systems will need to be developed. As a cost savings measure we recommend that your staff field measure existing conditions. We will develop the as-built drawings, demolition and remodeling documents and furniture documents. Written specifications wi 11 be part of the contract documents. 4. Issue and Review Bids Architectural Alliance will issue bid documents to all Owner approved bidders, field questions during the bidding period, and review and award bids with the Owner. 5. Observe Installation Architectural Alliance will be available to field questions during order entry of products, the construction and installation periods. We will provide project status reports to the Owner and make periodic site inspections. Minneapol~siSaint Ptiul ?win Cit~eS InlerneLOnal Airpprt Php@nix as-~ We have assembled a Team of individuals to complete these tasks. I will act as Project Manager, Jan Dehnert will be the Project Interior Designer and an architect will be assigned to coordinate the architecturally related aspects of the Project. This Project will not include changes within the existing Mechanical and Electrical Systems. We assume that Tom Ferber will be-our .main .liaison representing this Project. but realize that yourself- and:=others will also be particpating in the Project Team. ~~ ~~> ~ ~: For services outlined and described herein above~,,'we propose to accomplish the Professional Design Services on a time basis for a total fee for Direct Personnel Services not to exceed 57,900.00. Invoices would be billed monthly based on hourly rates. Any savings would accrue to the Owner. Normal reimbursables including travel, printing, postage, iong distance telephone calls are billed separately. If you concur with this Proposal, please sign both copies and return one copy to us. Retain the other for your files. On behalf of Architectural Alliance, I want to thank you for the opportunity to submit-this Proposal and look forward to an excellent working relationship. Sincerely, SHARRY C00 R Associate Director/Interiors EVE DEVICH Director Administrative Services cc: Jan Dehnert Herb Ketcham Cindy Ellsworth CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Q~ ~~' J Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 19U Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Scheduling Conflict Relating to May 27, 1985, City Council Meeting, Scheduling Meeting with Advisory Board of Health And Scheduling Study Session for Legion Lake Planning Process Council Members: The second council meeting in May is scheduled for Monday, May 27. Monday 27, 19.85, is Memorial Day, a legal holiday. The code of ordinances provides that when the regular council meeting date falls on a holiday, the meeting is held the following day. There are several scheduling conflicts with holding a council meeting on Tuesday, May 28, as follows: 1. On Tuesday, May 28, Mayor Hamilton is scheduled for his monthly Mayor's Hour between 7:00 p.m. ar.d 8:00 p.m. 2. Tuesday, May 28, is also the date for the Planning Commission meeting. This will cause conflicts for Council Liaison Mike Sar.darl and Community Development Director Dennis Kraft. The proposed Capital Improvement Program is scheduled to be discussed at that meeting. 3. Tuesday, May 28, is the date of the scheduled MASAC meeting, causing a conflict for Council Member Don Priebe and Community Services Director Don Fondrick. If there is a reed for a special council meeting in late May or early June, council members will be polled to determine a convenient time and date. The Advisory Board of Health has also requested an opportunity to meet jointly with the city council at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, June 10, 1985, to review their goals and objectives for the coming year. -2- ~ ~ . It is also recommended that a special city council study session on the Legion Lake Planning Process be scheduled for .7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 4, 1985. It is recommended that the city council meeting in May; confirm the city council and the Advisory Board 10, 1985, at 6:00 p.m.; and, schedu session on the Legion Lake Planning Tuesday, June 4, 1985. council cancel the second joint meeting of the of Health for Monday, June 1e a city council study Process for 7:00 p.m. on Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ ~~ John G. Cartwri h City Manager JGC/eja a~~ 'CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 193 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ratification of Addendum to Master Labor Contract with Local 49 for 1985-198b Council Members: City administration recommends council ratification of an addendum to the master contract between the City of Richfield and Local 49 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, which represents most of the city's maintenance employees. A majority of the bargaining unit employees have approved the changes in the Local Addendum. Changes in the Local Addendum to the contract are as follows: 1) Uniforms and Clothing: The City will supply employees temporarily assigned to work in the Garage/Mechanic areas appropriate work clothing. The clothing will riot belong to the employee, but remain city property. 2) Compensatory Time: A new Article was established for the employee to request compensatory time in lieu of overtime cash payments. The decision to grant compensatory time is made by the city. Compensatory time is earned at the rate of time and one-half for hours worked over eight (8) in a twenty-four (24) hour period, or in excess of forty (40) in a seven (7)-day period. Compensatory time shall not exceed a maximum bank of forty (40) hours. These changes will not add any additional cost to the city and may in fact reduce up front labor costs by eliminating some payout of overtime in lieu of compensatory time. It is recommended that the city council adopt the attached resolution. approving execution of this addendum agreement with Local 49 and authorize the City Manager to implement the provisions of this contract. R ectfu ~, omitted , ~ liL' `~ J n G. Cart fight City Manager " •" APPENDIX B ~ ~ ~1 . o~.,.~ LOCAL ADDENDUM This supplementary agreement is entered into. between the City of Richfield. and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49, AFL-CIO, for. the period beginning January 1, 1985 and ending December 31, 1986 Nothing in this supplementary agreement may be in conflict with .any provision of the MASTER AGREEMENT between MAMA, the. City of Richfield and I.U.O.E., Local No. ~#9, AFL-CIO. In the_eventof confli:et the MASTER AGREEMENT will prevail.. ARTICLE I. RECOGNITION. (Refer to Article II of MASTER AGREEMENT, Page 2) 1.1 Tre Employer recognizes tre Union as tre exclusive representative. under. MN Statutes, Section 179.71, Subd. 3, in an appropriate bargaining unit consisting of all employees of the following job classifications: GRADE* CLASSIFICATION LT1 Community Services Worker I LT3 Automotive Mechanic Assistant LT3 City Forester LT3 Community Services Worker II LTA Leadworker (Temporary) LT~t Meter Repair & Record Control Worker LT5 Automotive Mechanic LT5 Community Services Worker III LT5 Water Plant Mechanic LT5 Water Plant Operator -20- S Following is the 1985 pay schedule for these grades: GRADE LT1 8.14/hr. LT2 10.79/hr. LT3 11.30/hr. ' LT4 11.51/hr . LT5 11 .78/hr. a~~ 1.2 It is agreed by tre EMPLOYER and the UNION that the appropriate bargaining unit contained herein shall not include custodians. ARTICLE II. PART TIME EMPLOYMENT. 2.1 Part-time employees regularly assigned by the EMPLOYER to work more than twenty (20) hours per week will receive pro-rata benefits under this Labor Agreement except for monthly premiums 'for group insurance benefits, which shall not be applicable to part-time employees covered. by this agreement. 2.2 Part-ti.:~ne employees regularly assigned by the EMPLOYER to work less than twenty (20) hours per week shall not receive any benefits under this Labor Agreement. ARTICLE III. UNION SECURITY.. (Refer to Article III of MASTER AGREEMENT, Page 2 - Additional section, reading as follows:) 3.5 Not more than one (1) member of the Union Negotiating Committee may be absent from duty with full. pay for negotiation sessions for the purpose of negotiating terms of an agreement if such sessions are scheduled at a time when a negotiating team member is scheduled to be on duty. Such absences from work must be approved by the Division Head. and only if the Division Head determines that the absence would not be detrimental to division work programs. • • -21- ARTICLE N . WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION. ~ ~~ ~ (Refer to Article XXII of MASTER AGREEMENT, Page 1$) Employees required by the EMPLOYER and who are adjudged by the EMPLOYER to be qualified. to operate the following items of equipment will be paid the Community Services Worker III rate of pay for those hours.. assigned. to the unit.:. Motor: Patrol. Front.. end. loader of more than 2.5 yds. capacity Street Sweeper* Backhoe with at least 6-ft. reach Roller, 7 ton or larger Steamer ~' Including Vac-All equipment, only when being used for sweeping purposes. ARTICLE V. Ei~LIDAY LEAVE. 5.1 Employees, except for permanent part-time and part-time probationary employees, shall. receive eleven (11) holidays per year. Full-time shift employees stall receive eighty-eight (88) hours of holiday leave per year. Holiday leave for such employees may be accrued to a maximum of eighty-eight ($$) hours. Permanent part-time and part-time probationary employees shall receive a proportional part of each eight-hour holiday based on the following formula: Average Hours worked each day (exclud- ing holiday) during pay period in whicr holiday occurred Less than 4.0 4.0 - 5.9 6.0 - 7.9 8.0 -22- Number of holiday hours granted 0 4 6 8 ~'~ ~ 5.2 The following paid holidays will be granted to all employees .~ other than shift employees: New Year's Day on January 1; President's Day on .the third Monday in February; Memorial Day on the last Monday in May; Independence Day on July ~4; Labor Day on the first Monday in September; Veteran's Day on November 11; Thanksgiving Day on the fourth Thursday in November; Thanksgiving Friday on the fourtY? Friday in November; and CYzristmas Day on December 25. Employees shall receive one floating holiday to be scheduled with the approval of the Department Head or his designated. representative. Employees shall receive one additional holiday each year; the specific date of which shall. be designated. by the City Manager at the beginning of each year. during which said holiday shall occur. 5.3 Shift employees may request holiday leave at any time during the year with the provision that all such leave requests must be approved by the department head or his desi hated re resentative. g P In approving.such schedules, the department head or his designated representative shall consider the needs of the municipal service and the wishes of the employee and shall. respond to the employee's request within a reasonable length of time. Shift. employees shall be charged for the use of holiday leave in the amount-af not less than two (2) hours per occurrence. 5.4 A-shift employee who voluntarily terminates his employment with the EMPLOYER shall be paid for his accumulated holiday leave. hours as of his termination date provided re has given two weeks written notice of his termination. Employees who voluntarily terminate prior to completing a year of continuous and active City service shall not be eligible for terminal holiday leave Pay• -23- ARTICLE VI. VACATION LEAVE. p~ ~" (ip 6.1 All permanent and full-time probationary employees stall be eligible for vacation leave upon accrual except that nQ employee shall be allowed to use vacation leave until. after the completion of one full. year of employment, 6.2 Full-time employees shall accrue vacation leave according to tre following schedule: A. From the beginning of continuous zmployment through the fifth (stn) year of continuous employment, each employee shall earn vacation at the. rate of 3.70 hours per pay period (twelve (127 days per year). B. -From tt?e beginning of the sixth (6th) year and on through the tenth (10th) year of continuous employment, each .employee shall earn vacation at the rate of 4.62 hours per- pay period (fifteen (15) days per year). C. From the beginning of the eleventh (11th) year and on through the fifteenth (15th) year of continuous employment, each employee shall earn vacation at.tre rate of 5.54 hours per pay period (eighteen (18) days per year). D. From the beginning of the sixteenth (16th) year of continuous employment, and on, each employee shall earn vacation at the rate of 6.16 hours per pay period (twenty (20) days per year). 6,3 Part-time permanent and part-time probationary employees shall accrue vacation leave according to the following formula: -24- Number of hours worked bi-weekly Less than 40 40 - 59 60 - 79 80 Number of vacation hours granted bi-weekly 0 1.85 2.78 3.70 6.4 Vacation leave-may be accumulated to a maximum of 240. hours. This.. provision can be waived if written authorzatior. is obtained from the department head or his designated representative. Employees shall use vacation leave in the amount of not less than two hours. 6.5 In the event an employee-voluntarily terminated his employment with the EMPLOYER, he shall be paid for his accumulated vacation hours. as of his termination date, provided he has given two (2) weeks notice of nis termination. Employees who voluntarily terminated prior. to completing a year of continuous .and.. active City-.service shall not be eligible for terminal vacation pay. 6.6 All vacation leave must be approved by the Department~Head or his designated representative and filed in tre prescribed manner. with the Personnel. Office. ARTICLE VII. SICK LEAVE. 7.1 Sick leave shall be accrued by all full-time permanent and full- time probationary employees at tre rate of 3.70 hours per pay _ period up to a maximum of 960 hours. Trereafter the rate of accrual shall be two (2) tours per calendar month with no maximum accumulation. • ~~ L..J 7.2 Part-time permanent and part-time probationary employees shall accrue sick leave according to the following formula: ~~:~ -25- Number of hours Number of sick leave worked bi-weekly hours granted bi-weekly Less than 40 .. 0 40 - 59 _ 1.85 60 - 79 2.78 So 3.70 7.3 Sick leave may not. be used by employees during the first six months of their employment.. 7.4 Sick. leave shall not be cflnsidered as aright and may not be used at the employee's discretion, Siek leave may be used only in case of actual illness or injury,. legal quarantine, to receive dental or medical care, or for serious illness or death in the employee's. immediate family. Imanediate family shall be defined as the employee's wife, husband, children, mother, father, brotk?er, sister, grandmotrer, grandfather, mother-ir.-law, and fatter-in-law. Brother-in-law and sister-in-law shall be con- sidered as within the definition of immediate family only ir: the case of death. For serious illness or death in the immediate family, there stall be a maximum of three days sick leave permitted for any single occurrence. 7.5 The EMPLOYER has the right to verify the reported sickness of an employee and may require a doctor's certificate for absence due to sickness in those cases where there appears to be an abuse of sick leave. In all instances, the burden of proof for the use. of sick leave rests with the employee. ARTICLE VIII. SHIFT EXCHANGE. 8.1 Water Plant Operators may request to reschedule one eight (8) hour work. shift per-year, provided such work shift occurs during the day shift,. normally between the hours of 7:00 a.m. -26- and 3:30 p.m., Monday tlv^ough Friday. Such rescheduling c7`~~ g requests-must be approved in advance by the Supervisor, and may be refused at the supervisor's discretion. Upon granting such rescheduling request,. the EMPLOYER shall schedule the EMPLOYEE to work an eight (8) hour makeup shift, to be scheduled at the discretion of the EMPLOYER.. Such scheduling exchange shall not result in a reduction in the EMPLOYEE'S annual work schedule or an increase in the EMPLOYEE'S annual wage. In no event shall such rescheduling result in overtime for the affected employee, including work shifts exceeding ~O hours in a seven-day period... ARTICLE IX. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT. 9.1 The EMPLOYER shall provide the benefits. of the Richfield Employee Education Program. ARTICLE X.~ LONGEVITY. 10.1 Eligible employees shall receive a longevity .payment of 1 per cent based on current bi-weekly base salary after the completion of"five years of continuous service.. Eligible employees shall receive a longevity payment of 2 per cent after the completion of ten years of continuous. service, such payment to be based upon the employee's regular base rate. Eligible employees shall receive a longevity payment of 3 per cent based on current bi-weekly base salary after the completion of fifteen years of continuous service. 10.2. No .employee appointed to city.service after July 1, 1880 shall be eligible for longevity payments. For purposes of computing longevity benefits, eligible employee as used in tris article shall mean an employee appointed prior to July 1, 1980, who ras achieved the prescribed number of years of continuous service for each longevity step. -27- ARTICLE XI . COMPENSATORY TIME . ~,~ j~ 11.1 An EMPLOYEE may 'request compensatory time as defined herein in lieu of overtime cash payments for overtime worked which has been authorized by the Employer.. The decision to grant overtime .pay or compensatory bane will be made. by the .EMPLOYER.. 11.2 Compensatory time may be earned at the rate of time .and Qne-half for hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours within a twenty- four (24) hour period. (except:fbr shift changes) or in excess of forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day period.. 11..3 Compensatory time accumulation shall not exceed a maximum bank of forty (40) hours. 1Y.4 All requests. for earned compensatory time off shall be submitted to the EMPLOYER for approval and be filed in the prescribed manner-with the Personnel Office. ARTICLE.XII. t1NIP'ORMS AND CLOTHING. 12.1 The EMPLOYER shall provide Automotive Mec'rancs with appropriate work clothing as determined by the EMPLOYER, which shall be maintained by the EMPLOYER. The City will supply EMPLOYEES temporarily assigned to work in the Garage/Mechanic area appropriate work clotting as determined by the EMPLOYER, which shall be maintained by the EMPLOYER. This clothing will rot be issued to the EMPLOYEE and shall remain the property of the EMPLOYER. The EMPLOYER shall provide the Meter Repair and Record Control Worker, Water Plant Mechanic, Sewer Maintenance and Water Maintenance Workers and Mater Plant Operators with appropriate work clothing as determined by the EMPLOYER, which shall be maintained by the EMPLOYEE. -28- ARTICLE XIII. COFFEE BREAKS. ~ "' ~/ A 13.1 Employees shall be`granted a fifteen minute rest period on two separate occasions during each eight (a) hour work shift. One rest period shall be taken in the morning and one in the afternoon. Such-rest periods shall be taken in the-field at the job site unless inclement weather would make such a practice unreasonably difficult.. ARTICLE XIV. DURATION. This AGREEMENT shall. be effective as of January 1, 19$5 and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31st day of December, 1986. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this day of 1985. FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD: ~ FOR THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL N0. 49, Personnel manager Date AFL-CIO: Administrative Services Director Date City Manager Date Area Business Representative Date Steward Date • -29- CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA ~ ~~ / Office of City Manager The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Council Letter No. 192 Agenda May 13, 1985 Subject: Authorization to Negotiate for Park Land Acquisition - 6315 Portland Avenue South Council Members: The owner of 6315 Portland Avenue South contacted the city expressing an interest in the sale of the property. It~is a single family residence located adjacent to Legion Lake. This is a property that would be desirable for park land purposes. Appraisals of the property have been done. An independent firm estimates the market value of the property at $85,000 while the Hennepin County Assessor places the estimated market value at $82,000. The Community Services Advisory Commission reviewed the potential purchase and has recommended acquisition of the property. The Planning Commission reviewed the item at their meeting of April 23, 1985, ar.d found it in accordance with the comprehensive plan. It is recommended the city council authorize negotiation for purchase of 5315 Portland Avenue South for park purposes. The source of funding for this purchase would be special revenue as allocated for the Legion Lake project. Consideration will be given to applying for an acquisition grant from the State of Minnesota this year which, if successful in terms of obtaining a satisfactory term of purchase and approval of the grant, would reduce the amount needed from the Legion Lake project account. If and when satisfactory terms are reached, the city council would need to authorize the purchase. Re ectf 1 bmitted, r 7 ~~ ~~ GLL ~hn G. ar wrigh City Manager JGC/eja ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~~. a i- a~ ,-~ ~~ ;:. _,~; J~ u ~- ^^r ~~ ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA a D ~ l Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 191 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Proposed Agreement With Hennepin County Relating To Certain 911 Emergency Telephone System Charges Council Members: As the council is aware, Richfield, as well as several other Hennepin County cities who provide emergency Public Safety communications services, have been involved in something of a three way dispute between the cities, the telephone company and Hennepin County related to the charges of a single particular function of the 911 system. The function relates to the feature which automatically displays on a video screen the location from which the 911 call has been placed. The cost of this component feature was not clearly identified by the telephone company at the time the system was ordered in 1981. The system went into operation in December of 1982. The cost in dispute was not identified to the communities involved by the telephone company until late 1983. In mid 1984, the City Manager and the Director of Public Safety arrar.ged'for meetings between all of the affected parties ir. an attempt to resolve the accountability for this particular charge. As a result of that process, a negotiated settlement was reached which provided for Her.nepir. County to pay the accumulated charges from December, 1982, through June, 1984. At the time, the County Board rejected this compromise proposal. We have continued to attempt to resolve this situation. The Hennepin County Board has now taken formal action to accept the resolution originally negotiated. Most communities have indicated their willingness to accept this negotiated settlement. The Public Safety Director and I jointly recommend that Richfield also accept this settlement. To this end, the City Attorney has prepared the attached letter which I plan to submit on behalf of the City of Richfield to Hennepin County. The city budget has the funding allocation to meet Richfield's obligation for the period July, 1984 through December, 1985. There is a related development in the 911 system of which the council should be aware. Currently, the State of Minnesota is providing the funding for the telephone system network -2- ao _ ~.. itself. The costs to the communities with Public Safety communication centers relates only to the leased equipment and related services to provide the 911 answering service at the communication center. Early in this session of the legislature, there was a suggestion that the state funding for the system network be replaced with a surcharge on telephone bills throughout the state to fund the system cost. This would, in effect, provide for the system to be funded on something of a "user fee" basis. I am not sure that this would make any significant difference to the vast majority of telephone users in our state, since they are currently supporting the system through the general tax base. However, last week a bill has been introduced in the House which would remove state funding for the 911 system, without authorization for the telephone surcharge. The similar bill in the Senate does provide authorization for the telephone system surcharge. It is unclear what impact the present status of the legislation may have. If the House position is adopted by the legislature, the current system costs provided by the State of Minnesota would, of neccesity; be transferred to local and county units of government. This could have a most adverse affect on our local budgeting efforts. We will be following this legislation closely and will keep the council advised of actions which may seem appropriate for the city to take to protect our interests in maintaining this very important feature of our Public Safety communications system. Respectf y submitted, John G. Cartw ght City Manager JGC/eja a o-3 N ~~ ~ Lty o ^a ~ T .~ U ^ f+ L ~' ^ - 0 May 8, 1985 Commissioner Jeff Spartz Chairman, Hennepin County Board of Commissioners A-2400 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0240 Dear Commissioner Spartz: We have received the resolution approved by the Hennepin County Board on March 14, 1985. The City of Richfield agrees to accept the County offer to pay arrearages for 911 ALI charges through June 30, 1984; acknowledges the value of the 91i ALI feature; and agrees to pay charges from July 1, 1984 forward. This agreement is made on the condition that if one or more other "independent dispatch" communities in the county are not required to pay full charges for the ALI feature after June 30, 1984, Richfield shall not be required to do so either. Instead, in such event Richfield shall be given the most favorable treatment given to any such other community. Sincerely, John G. Cartwright Richfield City Manager telephone:8fi9-7521 (612) an equal opportunity employer 9-/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 190 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Planned Unit Development Plan Amendment for the Nautilus Swim and Fitness Club. Council Members: The Nautilus Swim and Fitness Club is requesting that the city approve an amendment to the PUD plan for the HUB shopping center area to allow the construction of a 14 x 32 foot addition onto the west side of .the existing building. As part of this construction a 23 foot long masonry trash screen wall with trash enclosure beyond will be built. The Nautilus Club has indicated that this facility has been one of their most successful locations. They have a problem with an insufficient number of lockers in the womens locker roam during peak class times. They typically run classes back to back, and during the period whet. one group is coming and another group is leaving, there is an insufficient number of lockers. To alleviate this problem, they propose to construct a 14 x 32 foot addition onto the womens locker room on the first floor. On the second floor would be a room which would be used for testing. The exterior of the addition would match the existing building. A six foot high masonry screer. wall would continue south of the new addition to provide a screened area for trash receptacles. The brick on the wall would match the building. The addition and trash enclosure area would be in an area currently used for employee parking. Approximately six employee parking stalls would be lost. The applicant has indicated that they would instruct their employees to park elsewhere in the HUB, shopping center area. Depending on the final design of the screen wall previously required by the council, four or five of these stalls would have beer. lost anyway. Staff has reviewed the proposal and ir, general find that the proposed addition would not adversely affect development in the area with the exceptior. of the parking problem which exists in the vicinity of the Nautilus. The addition would tie into the existing building well and a screened trash enclosure would be provided as previously required. The staff has concern -2- I ~' - z about the loss of the employee parking stalls on the property. Care needs to be taken that the employee parking displaced by the addition does not cause customer parking problems. The applicant should instruct its employees to park ir. the underutilized area generally north and east of the Marshalls Store. Council has expressed concerns about the width of the curb cut from 65tr. Street and staff recommends that this matter be added as a stipulation that the applicant agree to widen that curb cut at its expense. Staff has also noted that some handicapped parking stalls in the parking areas on the property seem to be substandard in width. Staff recommends that the council stipulate that handicapped parking stalls be at least 12 feet wide to meet state standards. It is recommended that the council approve the PUD plan amendment subject to following stipulations: 1) That employers strongly encourage their"employees to park in the underutilized area north and east of the Marshall Store in the HUB Shopping Center. 2) That the curb cut from 65th Street be widened to 32 feet and the radius on the west side of the curb cut be increased to 15 feet.. 3) That handicapped stalls in the parking lot be at least 12 feet wide. Respectful submitted, ohn G. Car wri t City Manager JGC/eja .. T.f ~' r }~ } 1, l :~ I I+ E~ ~: r #' !, `` ' ._ _ I _ ~~~ ~ .3i\ 1. 1 ~ ~~'~ ~ `i `~ ~; r-~_ ~ . I ~ . I . ` l` I IIIi11lT ~IIII ''I Ilj I! ~ YJ 11.u ~ I ~I I. 'I h I j i 'I ~ ~ I ~ II91 ~'~IIII 1111L~I11~1 IIII I~') I II~II~I~IIIII,~ it l~' IIII, I~~ j'III~IIIII~ ill ~; !~ I I I ~~~I I I ~' I I I "' I i,l~~ I I I II IJ I ~' I IIII~'~I~ ~ V ~ ~ '~ ~ ~' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~li'I, ~I:I I I II ~II~ ~~I~yl, ~i li ~ u ~~ ~~ ~I III ~' II Ir~II IIII I I I,IIIII IIII I I II I' III I IIIIII: t~(~~(1 I I II ~~j,l II III.IIII) 111'I I,~III I j,IIII l IIII III' ~~ IIII II~Ilullii~l Y~ I III':,1 I :I 11~'I I~'I i ~ II I'll I I Il.illl I I :I I '~ I I I~,I i''~ I,.,IIIIii I I I'J~II: I Get'(', U4" !;illllllll ~ !Ili ~lil!ilvlLill; , ~, I I IIII';III~ III 'i~ III IIIIIip~ 111'111 III) rl Ii I ~,~, i ~ I II III '.III I I LII~ ~I~ ~I~I11 I'il!I~II I I I h I~ I ~~ III~~~ ~~ I ~I ~ ~~ l ~'j II I I I IIII ~II h~II I)I i ~ ~~ III ~~ (; I ~ III I I p.Ijli II l I ~ll ll; 1111111 I!ill' I IIII II I IIII I IIII II I I I II'!Iill1! I I II III ~ I, ,III N I II jlllll IIII II IIII!p II ~ II I ~i441 I I~I'~ ~ ,Iii III ~ I~'in ~~ ~ ~~ ~Illi .o IIIII lid II I I I I lil III qli I II~~1 IIL- II !I I~ilil ' III IIIII Ii,. ~I~III i ~II~I III II II,~II ~I i j p~~l I '~ II 111111 I' Ill„ ll ''!I ' ""~''• I I~I I' (I I I I l ~' I I' , , Il Iii I 1 I 'l~ll I I I I;II h ~ i II it ~ I~j h I ~, . I I II III I ! i i II Ili Lil I ' III IIII II ~ I I I !i ~ II IIIII- I q hi III I. 1 ~nlll III~II~i1!IJI~I~'I'I~lil!I,~I~Ii I III ~I~I 'II~~~III'I II ;I,I~I' ,I I l,,i~l~l I I I ~ I I II III.uI III ~'~I_I II~.~ 151 .I~;j-III 11 III 'I;i I'.I I ' II I I 'll ICI II it I I I' i~11 II 'l I IIIII II'~ ~ I I. n II II it ,, j;1 III I I I I I I I II 11.. 1 1 1 I, I I ~! 1, III I I .IIII ~I i I II' ~ ~'''llllillll Ilul~l li I I III IIII II' I ~I I I'I;11 II I I III .' I I ' I ~_.~'* a ~I I I III I I ~I~ I I, ~ I IIII I Ili i~Ilij'I I~I I II I I I I '' IIII. , I I I I I I I ~ hI I Iliillail ~ lij i III! ( b11 a 111111 Ilil ~l. I~I I a l~- ~I11 .I III II ,I IIII I I .. Illil;. I II ~C ~ ~.'`~ III III IIIII IIIII III I Liill 'I I II 1111 I -tjy-{~ _II I ~ ll„_~~ ., I ,~iil I Illlli fili_i I ~ ~'I ~I I d1 III nlrn I III I I unll 11! fr1 ~ ~~~r r = - III `lam l1; I i _ ~ ~ 'I, III II;;~ ~ I l u' ~I! I ICI ,,, ~ I - ~L:11' 'I:I: ~ ~ I - III; IIaI j'~, t-~~~. ~C1, I I I~~i, IIII;; ~Z; i I'I~' ,:, .p ~~ ~' i I I lu Ilil ', I~~ ~ ~~ I I I III ,I I ~li'! ~! I I I , i +--- '. a ILiI,IIIIP / i ~ , `~ 7_ ~ ~, I ~ ~. 1- . ' ~~- ~ ; I V I ~ I I ~, . I I - ~ ~I '' ~ I III '~~ `~ ~ I ~ ~ 1. I i , ', I' ~ ~ 7 . - ~ .) r ~ - - - I _-. I -.`~ --, I i 'i . ~ I' ~ ~', • \ 1~ I 11,1 •. ~ t r _~ ..; +f <' ' 4 '~ c -; ~--: Z: l 5 4 7 ~S Li r ::r <, i; ~.'a' ~~. ~; t 11 ._1 >> i .' ~~ !! ~I ~: 'i 1 e i i _-1. ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~ v,ii , _. ~ . ~ ~ ~_ ~-, ~, ~-~; <. ~ ~ L ~~~~ ~~=.~~e ..-, _ .. _ ___ __ ._.._ ~~2-. _ _ _ _~~_ LSp ~ 4.~ ~. ~>>~ o_ ~~ _ ~- ~~ ~ ' ~ .S _ i i ~ 1 1.~ i ~ _~ ~ ~ , - ;v ~~~ ~~ V 1 J /`~ I I ; ~~ J •` 1 II ~ I .._. _~ _.. _ .. __~ - .. I _.__ _ __ _ 'I I ~ I 1L ~ .. 1:1 i ~, ~ I I t_ I~ ~ - ; ~ '1 i u ' ~ ~ ~1 i ~~ !: `~~ r` 1 ~'~ i r ~~~~ ~> ~ ~~ ~ " ` _~ _ _ I ` ' V S I - ~~_ ~r~. ~ ~I I~ 1 Y 'S,`~ ~ ~ I ~. ~ . - -- ; i ^ ~ - --- ` ~~ ~ • ~ ~ , ,,, •i i ,, f~ 9 f' 1~~~] ll1 ;t .. ,~ ~~~- , ~. _, ` . . i, .. ..~ a -~ rL .. ---- - ~ ~. ~~ ~ - ' I _ -___ I I ~•S -. -~---~--- . I ; ~=~ -.: ~,, r I i '~' ~~ ~ z ~ ~ . ,,. ' ~ F` -- -~ ~'' ~! ~ - \~ ~ ~ . _ fit` _ ~__ .~.- -~ _- ~ __ -. ---Z~ - ~~ ~ - 4 \~j D\~ ~ ~ I - - ~ , i~ Iii V I I I ~, ' ~ '~ i - =-'Q- c I ~ ~~J, ., .. ~.~ ~~ , r ~ I i ~. O, G 7 ,` y 1 ,1 i .t\ t J ~f' ~.: - ~\ ~ \ - 1 195 h i r -1. c t i .S, . -_ ;~'1 t~ ~ ~ _l ~_ `. " ' •i r . Ll -' 1 _ I f' • ~. fir{ ,•-'r'~~ . - _.i~ ].::1`TZ . t _ __. _~3 .J • t , 1 I , ,, ':.'l r i _~ f~i . _ __ _ 1. .'. r ~ '~`' ~' ~ • ;~ ~~ -~ ~. ~ , .r ~ - C ` ~ Cy5 ;, ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~~ ~z~ i ~ ~~ -~ ~ n ~.. -- . ~\ .--'_: _~' } i 1 i `~- -iii; ..Q s ,-47 ~ tl.~~ ~ 1 `~ 1. ~ ~ -% S ~ \`, v ~ 1 ~~/ -1',' I O _ , 1~ 1 p_ _ I SIC -_ y ~ ~ - :1•~ , il~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~~ ~~ _ .~. _~ .~. p^ =~ ~ i t , _ N ~ ~ ~- 1 ' i ,,- ,l -"~ ~~ t. r-~ 1 -}~ i ~(1 ~~ ~) c~ ,~~ i ~ _ ~~ j; ~ ~ << / ~`~•_l ~ ~ ,~..`~\~ O ~ ~ ~\\ ~~ ,~-~ /•=11 `_ t ~ '~ 1 J~J/// J ~ ~~lJ1 ~`~ ~--~ a,:.~~;, \ ~ `,'~ f Z~ L ~i ~`~ Z ~~ -''\ - •- - - - --J- ~' ~ ' i 1~ y , Jw .~ ~.~- 1'~'Q c ~~ tai C~ J .~ x ~~ ~y i i Zt/ v -, - i - ji --o. -~.. - - ~ ._ -9/ __ ~ ----- ~ ~_ ~ r. Q ) r _ ~~ ~~ 'n~;~i ~ i/ Z~ , 3 i ~1 3 j ' `' i c~ `~ ~ 1 } a~( t~~ ' `~~ld 1 .~\V _, \ ~ ~ '`~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ` v Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 189 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Refund of Special Use Permit Fees by Paul Knudson. Council Members; The city council in the past year has denied Paul Knudson two special use permit requests to locate a restaurant in the Viking Center shopping center at 78th Street and Morgan Avenue. Mr. Knudson has requested that the city refund the fees which he paid as part of the special use permit application process. Mr. Knudson paid a total of $546.00 in fees. Mr. Knudson has recently received a building permit ($246.07 total, $163.07 building permit, $83.00 plan review fees) to make some interior improvements prior to opening his carry out restaurant. A special use permit is not required for a carry out food business. The fees charged for special use permits are necessary to offset the city's costs of reviewing applications. These costs are passed on to the applicant in the form of fees so that the general taxpayers of the city are not paying for the process which typically only benefits the applicant. Staff analyzed the costs incurred to the city in reviewing Mr. Knudsons' two special use permit requests and determined that the costs exceeded the fees paid by Mr. Knudson. The city's costs were approximately $720 while the fees paid were only $546. It is recommended that Mr. Knudsor.'s request for a fee refund be denied. Res ectf~'1?~ submitted, ~ (~~ t,~ ~G~ ti'2~ J _n G . C twr i;g t ity Manager j PECIAL USE ~ ~~ PAUL KNUDSON S PERMIT FEE ANALYSIS APPLICATION #1 1. STAFF TIME (133 RATE) A. SENIOR CLERK TYPIST: Set up file, obtain PIN numbers, memo to data processing for mailing labels, type and stuff envelopes for public notices, type and distribute referral letters, type planning commission and city council letters, and type council action letter. 4 hours x $7.g7/hour = $31.98 B. PLANNING INTERN: Receive application, 2 site checks, phone conversations with applicant, draft planning commission letter, reviewing draft with city planner, preparing attachments and exhibits, preparing and presenting oral staff report to planning commission, and preparing draft staff report. g hours x $10.56/hour = $95.04 C. CITY PLANNER: Site check, reviewing draft planning commission letters, phone conversations with applicant and neighbors, planning commission meeting, reviewing draft council letter, council meeting, and preparing council action letter 3 hours x $19.06/hour = $57.18 D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Site check, review of draft planning commission letter, discussions with city planner, planning commission meeting, and review draft council letter, and discussions with city manager. 2 hours x $27.37/hour = $54.74 E. CITY MANAGER: Review draft council letter, discussions with community development director, and council meeting 2 hours x $32.51/hour = $05.22 F. OTHERS: (City Attorney, City Engineer, Building Official, Fire, and Police) Review and comment on application Estimate total to be $50.00 2. OTHER COSTS A. Public hearing notice: Mailing Labels from data processing $15.00 B. Legal notice publication costs $13.79 Costs to city (Application #1) _ $382.95 -2- APPLICATION #2 1. STAFF TIME (133 RATE) ~ 8--3 A. SENIOR CLERK TYPIST: 3 HOURS AT $ 7.97/HOUR = $ 23.91 B. PLANNING INTERN: 1 HOUR AT $10.56/HOUR = $ 10.56 C. CITY PLANNER: 6 HOURS AT $19.06/HOUR = $114.36 D. COMM. DEV. DIRECTOR: 2 HOURS AT $27.37/HOUR = $ 54.74 E. CITY MANAGER: 2 HOURS AT $32.01/HOUR = $ 65.22 F. OTHERS: + $ 50.00 2. OTHER COSTS: A. Public Hearing Notice $10.00 B. Legal Notice Publication: $ 8.20 COSTS TO CITY (Application #2) _ $336.99 TOTAL COSTS = $382.95 + $336.99 = $719.94 FEES PAID = $546.00 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA i ~ ~ / Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 188 Agenda May 10, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Amendment To City Ordinance Code Related ,To The Disposition Of Certain Property Council Members: Earlier this year, several council members brought to the attention of the city council an incident in which a citizen found a sum of money and turned this finding over to the Department of Public Safety. While the issue of found money being turned into the Public Safety Department is not a frequent occurance, the issue of citizens turning found property into the Public Safety Department is quite common. In any event, in this particular situation, the finder of the lost money felt that precluding successful efforts of the Public Safety Department to locate the rightful owner, the finder should have claim to the property found, in this case a sum of money. Current provisions of our ordinance code require that property coming into possession of the Public Safety Department be sold at auction, after a specified period of time, with the proceeds applied toward the city's general fund. In the case of money, the money itself would be applied directly to the city's general fund. Council Members requested that a provision be provided which would enable the finder of lost property to rightfully claim such property absent the Public Safety Department's ability to locate the rightful owner. The Public Safety Director and the City Attorney have been working on this issue for a period of months. The resolution has been difficult because Minnesota State Statutes have not clearly provided for the circumstances involved in the matter brought to the attention of the Council. However, the City Attorney has proposed an amendment to Richfield Ordinance Code 12.01 which would address the interest expressed by the city council. A copy of this ordinance amendment is attached. - 2 - ~ ~~ ~.~+• It is the recommendation of the Director of Public Safety, in which I concur, that a process for returning lost property, absent the Public Safety Department's ability to identify the rightful owner be established. Also it is recommended that the attached ordinance amendment be given favorable first reading consideration. Re ectfu bmitted, L `~-~ VL'v ~(i~"ti J hn G. Car wrig t City Manager JGC/eja /7-3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE A1'ZENDING SECTION 12.01 OF THE RICHFIELD ORDINANCE CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE DISPOSITION OF LOST PROPERTY COMING INTO THE POSSESSION OF THE CITY CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 12.01 of the Richfield Ordinance Code is amended by adding the following: "Subd. 7. Lost Property. The provisions of sub- divisions 1 through 6 of this section shall not apply to any item which is surrendered to the city as lost property. Any such item shall be retained by the city for a period of six months and shall be returned to its owner ~.:aon proper request at any time during that period. Auer three months if the item has not been returned ~o its o~~ner it may be claimed y t e ender upon prc~er request. After six months any item which has not been returned to its owner or claimed by the finder shall become the property of the city and may be di._aosed of as provided in subdivisions 2 or 3 of `his section. No owner or finder shall have a cl~.m against the city for dis- position of lost proper=y if a good faith effort has been made to comply wit:: this subdivisior_. The ~ro- visions of this subdivision shall r_ot apply to stolen property, keys, firearm=, dancerous weaoons, illegal items, liquor or narcotics." Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of ,.1985. John N . Hami i ton , _~iayor Attest: Sy via K. Berg City C er ~~- r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 187 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ordinance Amending the Licensing Requirements for Domestic Animals. First Reading. Council Members: At the City Council meeting of April 22, 1985, the City adopted the Second Reading of an ordinance establishing a rabies vaccination requirement for the licensing of domestic.animals. The intent of that ordinance amendment was to require that domestic animals rave a current rabies vaccination at the time of licensure. Upon further examination of the ordinance, that if an animal was given a two-year innocul expires after June 1, 1985, but before Jur.e 1, could not be issued even though the animal has shat at the time of the application. This was intent of the vaccination requirement. it was discovered ation which 1986, a license a valid rabies not the For example, if an animal was giver. a two-year innoculation on January 1, 198 which is effective until December 31, 1985, the ordinance as adopted would require the animal to be innoculated again on June 1, 1985 because the innoculation must be valid for the entire license year (June 1, 1985 through May 3~, 1986). Some animal owners would no doubt object to having to pay for a second innoculation within a period of two years when. they had already paid for a two-year innoculation. Veterinarians give rabies vaccinations which vary in the length of effectiveness, which makes it difficult to provide ordinance language which could anticipate each individual case at the time of licensure. Thus, the attached amendment has been prepared to provide that the requirement for licensure would be that the animal has a current rabies vaccination at the time of the license application. without regard to the duration or expiration of such vaccination. -2- /6- ~- Under the attached amendment, if the person in the above example is issued the license and the innoculation expires on December 31, 1985, the animal owner will either: (1) have the pet innoculated on January 1, 1986, or (2) have the animal innoculated in June of 1986. From then on, the innoculation period would coincide with the license year. It is recommended that the City Council approve this ordinance amendment and schedule Second Reading for June 10, 1985. In addition, if the ordinance is approved for First Reading, it is further recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to administer the present ordinance for domestic animal licensure similar to the ordinance amendment proposed here. This will enable the City to process the many animal renewal licenses which are due for renewal during the month of June, 1985, prior to the effective date of the proposed ordinance amendment. Res ectfully . submitted, • r John G. Car wr~ ht City Manager JGC:sb AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER V 16 ` OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Chapter V of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield relating to the licensing of domestic animals is hereby amended in the following respects: I. Section 5.27, Subdivision 5 is amended by adding the following: "Applicants shall provide a certificate issued by a doctor of veterinary medicine licensed to practice showing that the animal has been vaccinated against rabies and that such vaccination is effective on the date of the application ." -E~--t-~~~ri-mil ~a~- ~i-ee-~- i'$et~.Ti'L~ -e-d- egg-a-i-~-s-t-- -~-ear-i~-s- -~-i-~~ i-~- ~- -~e-r3-o~d er4 = ~-e- -y-e~- ~~e-e-d~-ng- ~~!-e- -a-p-~r13~-a~3-o~- -~'~- -a- 33T-~- = = j ~- ~{ ~~ - -t-Y~~-t- -stagy-l~- fr- ~-e~e-ems-era-t3~r- ~ra~ ~e~e-t~- -g~-~e-:n- ~ri~ ~r-i3-~.- -b•e- ~e-€'-€'~e~~~-e-- ~'~- ~- ~e~s~- -o-~r~e- -y-ea-r- ~-#'~re-~- ~~-e 3-e-a-t~~- ~'o-~- ~~re-- 3~ ~e-e-~-s-e• : ~ Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 1985• .Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 1 ~-I CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 186 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Resubdivision of HRA Property in the Vicinity of 66th Street and Rae Drive and Discussion Concerning Future Zoning Classification of the Property. Council Members: The Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority has acquired the properties located at 901 - 903 Rae Drive, 910 West 66tr. Street, 920 West 66th Street and 1016 West 66t'h Street. A two family dwelling has been built or. the property at 920 West 66th Street. The HRA has been exploring alternative concepts for developing additional two family dwellings on the remainder of the properties. The HRA staff has been working closely with an architect and with the three abutting single family residential property owners on Rae Drive to come up with an acceptable design concept concerning the number of additional two family dwellings, the design and location. of these dwellings, and a design for buffering these new units from the existing single family residential development. The project, when completed, will have 10 dwelling units. RESUBDIVISION Earlier this year, the Planning Commission and City Council approved a common element residential subdivision of the two family dwelling at 920 - 924 West 66th Street which was developed by the HRA. The subdivision approved by the City was a common element residential subdivision creating three new lots. One lot was created for each dwelling unit and the remainder of the existing lot was a common. lot. This subdivision was necessary to allow each of the units to be owner occupied. The HRA is now requesting that the entire property that they have acquired, including the developed property at 920 - 924 West 66tr. Street, be resubdivided to create townhouse type of ownership of the total site. This is necessary to provide an integrated development and to insure proper design and maintenance of the site. Under this type of ownership there -2- i 5•z would be individual lots under each of the dwelling units and the remainder of the site would be a single lot under the ownership of an association consisting of the owners of the individual dwellings. The problem which has been created by the subdivision of 920 - 924 West 66th Street, if this subdivision approach were to be applied to the remaining undeveloped sites would be a residential subdivision with a total of five common lots and ten living unit lots. Individual property rights and the rights of the homeowners association might conflict and lenders might reject the townhouse documents and purchase agreements. For this reason the HRA has submitted a revised plat for the total area for city approval which creates individual lots under the two existing dwelling units and then a large common lot which would include 0utlot A and Outlot B and the common lot 3 previously created (see exhibit "A"). Outlot A, Lot 3 and Outlot B would be under control of the two property owners but would restrict the use of Outlots A and B of that property until such time as the total area is developed. At some future date, when the remaining lots are developed, the property would be replatted again to create individual lots under each of the new dwelling units with the remainder of the site being common lot or lots under the control of an association of all the owners within. the subdivision. The HRA intends to select a developer for developing the remainder of the site and would, at that time, go through a planned unit development rezoning and approval process for the site as a whole. This planned unit development plan approval process is scheduled to occur in late Fall of 1985• FUTURE REZONING The second item requested concerns the future zoning classification of the property in question.. The three residential property owners on Rae Drive abutting the site have expressed concerns about density of development for the HRA site. They do not want more dense apartment type of development in the area and wart to make sure that adequate open space is maintained. For this reason a design guide has been developed which will set the perimeters for any future development on the site. A copy of the design guide is attached for your information. The neighbors have accepted the concept of the series of four additional two family dwellings on the site (8 additional dwelling units). To carry out this kind of development in ar. integrated manner, as discussed previously, it will be necessary to rezone the property which is now zoned single family residential. Because of the integrated nature of the development and the subdivision arrangement, the proposed development could not be considered as individual two family dwelling units. The project must be considered as a ten dwelling unit multi-family type -3- S• 3 project. Richfield's present zoning ordinance would require that the site be rezoned to some type of multi-family zoning. The planned unit development plan option seems to be the best to protect against the possibility of higher density development occurir.g on the site at some future date as feared by the abutting property owners. It is important for the HRA and adjoining neighbors that the density be restricted. Three alternatives have been considered to provide a rezoning solution. The city's zoning ordinance provides for two types of planned unit development zoning districts: planned single family residential (PR) (first alternative); and, planned multiple family residential (PMR) (second alternative). The adjacent neighbors would prefer requesting that a planned single family residential district (PR) rather than a planned multiple residential district (PMR) be used. It is staff's feeling, however, that the proposed density of use is beyond what would be allowed in a PR district ar.d that a planned multiple residential district designation would be required. There currently are no provisions for a planned two family district in Richfield's zoning ordinance (the third alternative). While the planned multiple residential district would allow the density of development to exceed what is contemplated on the site, it would be tied to a specific plan. Higher densities of development would not be permitted unless the city approved an amendment to the plan at some future date. Additional units could not be constructed or, if the existing development was damaged or destroyed, any future development would have to be the same as originally approved. It is staff's opinion that futher protection could be given to the residential property owners by amending the city's zoning ordinance to make provision for a planned two family residential zoning distrct. If the ordinance is amended and if the subject property is rezoned as such then the desired density could be maintained. PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the platting of the properties at 910, 920/924, 1015 West 66th Street, and 901/903 Rae Drive. The Planning Commission further recommended that the City Council direct the staff and Planning Commission to prepare and submit an ordinance amendment to create a planned two family dwelling district (third alternative). The staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendations. ~ Re ectful(Ly~ s mitted, ohn G. Cartw ~ ht City Manager JGC/eja ,- 'nf .fat«.y .tf it ?ce aa„t+ ~ 1 S ~ ~ _ ~ 125.80-_~ -_M~redoo'e . t _ + C i ~ ~ _ 1699 t03Tt _ . . ~~ i~ ~ - ~ f ~ y ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '^ O 3. i ~ s ~ ~ 73 i3 rn ~ _ R . ~ ~~.~ ~ ~~ - ! n C . _ ~.~ ~ a+ 2 r o O C _{ ~; a .. j 9 ' Q ~ C I o ~ ~; O _ II t o_ 3 - - s Y 3 ~ zo 3 ~g a 3.~ . ~ r $ . = ~' X~l~~ I ~' __ - _ - ..n1 }y ~~t d. 9M 6GdtlNt. Ry. .. ~ __~~ _~ !f of y f Nt3'OC 70'e ' 5:3 0000 • }T. d: 4 91 ~ VN S ~ - O~ j vi3"+ . .t N. ~g ~ r ,y a '. ae/~ ' n i o }r,~y t ` a- O ~ 0 ~ _ 0 'r') ~ ~ ~ 3~ $ ~I Q i ~ f . ~ .~ 3 `~~-- ~ ~ f i ..,.. -s. ca ..pro-_ ~! '' ~f y, ~. f ~ (. ~... S~3'.0 u`0 ~ ~2., ~~ ( ~! - J8_y / I 1 _ - ~ O ,. ~ ~~ ~ I ... ~ Z .. ~ ~ \~ _ j ' _ ! ~~r 1 ~/O/ U / . 33 - a d"2800'w T " ~ ~ . r I ,, f ,~ ~~ ,~ l ;' ~,qf, o~~yF r ~~~~~ i ~1~ i '~ ••.",--~ r"""'~s r i ' ~ ~~ i ` + ' I ~., r ~~ ,j `!~`. ~ :~ i~ ~ 3~ ~ ~E rt~:~ -' '~~ ~. ;, '`~ ~ 0 `~ ~..~. 15-S (_.~ t~~ ,- :. _ \ '~ ~` ~~ ~` / !, .,f. ,; -, ,.~ .; I( y . Sr~~ r ~r . ,~ . -,~,`~ .~ ~ ~ ~~_` ~~ ~~ ' °21-Zs ~ , ;~ ,, ~ . ': ~... '~. ; --ice-~ GOALS I. Ta provide. eight new owner-occupied duplex type townhouses affordable for first-time home buyers. Z. To provide. an attractive, energy-efficient, noise attenuated living environment. for the new residents. 3. To provide a development or" the land that will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. EX1STlNG COND1TlON5 SITE OESCRIATIONS 66th Street and Rae Drive Development Area. consists of an irregularly shaped. parcel of land approximately 55,OOOs.f. in size. There is approxi- mately 392 .feet of frontage on 65th street and 292 feet on Rae Drive. A newly constructed double.house occupies the central portion of the site. LOCATION ' The 66th Street and Rae Drive Development Area is located in the north central section of the city Richfield, a first ring suburb south of Minneapolis:.- The site is three blocks east of Highway 3~W on 66th Street a major arterial roadway. CONTEXT The sits is located between 'rlood Lake. and Richfield Lake. it is bounded on the nor~h by single family houses, the west by townhcuses, the south by single family and duplexes and commercial on the east. The site has bus service on 56th Street, is close to shopping, within the Richfieid - School District and is conveniently located near i-35w and the Crosstown . Highway. TOPOGRA?HY a The 65th Street and Rae Orive Development area is located on a gentle knoll that slopes down to the south and east. VEG~ I'ATION A number of mature maple, oak, cottonwood and elm trees exist thrauahout the site and a lilac hedge is located on the western edge of the parcel. i s-.~ • UTILITIES 66th Street contains storm, sanitary and water service. -The north end of Rae Drive contains water service and the site is accessible to-phone and electric service. EASEMEN? There is_ a 20 r"aot highway easement. at the south edge or" the property for street work completed in 1983. - LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' Lots 1, 6, 7, and 8 Rae Addition, according to the plat thereof on-file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County, and all that. part of Section 28, Township 28, Range 24 in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point marSced "Judicial Landmark" on the east and west. quarter section. pine of said section distant 4I0-"eet west measured along said line fron tha east quarter corner of said settio~n 28; Thence South at right angles to said east and west quarter section line 74.6 .feet to a point on the original Military Reservation line, which point is 83.5 feet SEIy measured along said reservation-line from its inter- section with the east and west quarter sec+°~on line:, of said Section said point being marked by a monument. marked "Judicial Landmark" thence South 71°10' West Ii5.44 feet to a point in the traveled road; thence North . 71°32' West TOS.09 feet to point of beginning of ttte tract hereby to be described; thence continuing North 7i°32' West a distance of 140.53 feet; thence North 1.3° East a distance of 165.9 reef; thence South 83°50' east .- -140.9 .feet; thence South 13°'West a distance or 196.1 felt to point of beginning.. The site is being replaced as a ccsrJnon .lot subdivisioh to accommodate duplex type townhouses. - ZONING The site is presently zoned single family residential. Duplex housing is permited in a single. family district by special use permit, and the Planning ~' Commission has determined that duplex housing is consistant with .the com- prehensive plan for the 'area. The Richfield HRH has received preliminary assurances that the Planning Car~nission and City 'Council will support a ,M armed Unit Development .Concept for. the development area when final plans are completed. This assurance is based on the development. consisting of not more than 3 duplex type units. • / S- 8 DESl~i~ GUIDELINE F . Proposals submitted for development of the both Street and Rae Drive site should strive to meet the development objectives 1rsted below. The Guidelines were created to insure that the housing built on the site responds to the concerns of the surrounding neighborhood'and the Richfield Rousing and Redevelopment Authority. - GcNERAL • 1. Type of Ownership AlT units sha11 be owner occupied. _ 2. Housing Type - - All units sha11 be Duplex type.. 3. Density ' The maximum allowable number of units wi11 be ~ on both the portion of the sfite west of the existing duplex and east of the existing duplex. The total number of units sha11 not exceed 8. 4. Price Range of Units The housing sha11 be marketed bet~een 550,000 and 570,000 a dnit. SATE STANDARDS ~. The development shall provide a transition between the. single family :housing on the north and busy both Street on the south. 2. The development shall be effectively screened from the single family houses utilizing a variety of materials and techniques. • 3. Vehicular access to the western portion or" the development and to the existing duplex sha11 be from ooth Street. Vehicular access to the eastern portion of the development shall be from Rae Drive at least 100 feet from the ooth Street intersection. Curb cuts sha11 be minimized. ?. A tot lot accessible to all families in the development shall be ~- provided within the eastern portion•of the site. S. The grounds shall be landscaped to be aesthetically pleasing in all seasons. Land forms and plant materials shall be used to define and buffer the site. 6. Site lighting sha11 be used to promote the safety and security of the guests and residents of the development. IS 9 ~ 7. Power and telephone •lines are to be buried. 8. Utility meters sha1T be screened from bothoc'th Street and from Rae Drive. 9. Site drainage i5 a significant concern of-the adjacent neighbors. Drainage should be accommodated on the'srte so that water is directed away from the new units and .the neighboring property. excess water steall be directed to 66th Street. - I0. Existing treys sha11 be preserved whenever possible. Care should be taken to preserve existing root .systems. BU~LDlNG STANDARDS , 1. The developr~ent shall have a mix of two and three. bedroom .units, but not more than 4 three bedroom units. Z. All units shall have parking that accommodates three cars: one enclosed garage space, one in the unit maheuvering space, and one visitor's parking space nearby.. 3. Sound control between units is of the utmost importance for family living. Double wall constrdction shall be used. to minimize the transfer of noise between units. 4. Unit height and mass. are significant concern of the adjacent neighbors. The scale of the buildings shall be compatible with the scale. of the surroun-ding neighborhafl d. The use of a vari_ety•of techniques incTudirg stepping the rear building line and orienting the roof slopes to mini- miza their impact on the neighboring homes ~o the north sha11 be expected. 5. Exterior materials should be low maintenance and compatible with the surrounding homes. 6. Units. should be contemporary in appearance and.the exteriors should be varied but related to each other. 7. Each unit shall have asemi-private outdoor space; deck patio, o.r parch. 8. The use of amenities which make the townhomes more livable is en- couraged. Thesemight include bay windows, increased floor area., sky lights, oak trim, or basements. • 1 S- i0 SOUND STANDARDS. Sound Control Ta facilitate the reduction of interior sound levels produc~d.by aircraft and traffic. noise, the following is required:: Windows shall have a minimum sound transmission coefficient (STC} of 30. Windows which meet this requirement. usually employ double glazing and.. aremovablestorm panel. Sliding glass and hinged-patio doors shall have a m inimum sound transmission. coeri`icient (STC} of 30. All ventilation ducts, except range hoods, connecting interior space to outdoors shall be provided with a bend such that no direct line of sight. exists from exterior to interior through the, vent. . Manufacturers shall submit STC levels determined by testing according to ASTM E90-75 or equivalent.. ENERGY STANDARDS General Requirements ...Construction methods-and materials must meet the requirements outlined in this section. These requirements are derived in part from the MHFA Prescriptive Energy Requirements for 3uilders as cited far the 1983 Single Family Mgrtgage Loan Rrogram; participants are encouraged to obtain and read. this booklet. As an alternative to meeting the prescriptive standards far soecific insulation values- of building components, a thermal integrity factor (T.I.F.} calculation may be performed according to the method described - in the MHFA Energy Efficient Housing Demonstration ?rogram workbook. The maximum allowable T.I.F. is 4. If the glass area exceeds Ito of the floor area, the T.I.F. calculation must be performed. Insulation Requirements The following overall minimum insulation values o-' building envelope ' components must be met: Ceilings: R40 Wa11s: R22 Foundation 'Mall s From top of rim joist to frost Tine: 215 From frost line to footings: R5 Slab on grade Edge and'2 foot wide perimeter strip: Ri5 Slab interior: R5 Floors above unheated spaces: R22 ~ 5= ~/ ~- Joints in heating ducts passing through unheated spaces sha11 be fu11y insulated and sealed (use "hardcast" or silicone sealant, not duct tape) The joint between the- bottom of all gypsum board wa11s and floars- (including interior and party walls) sha11 be caulked (before the base molding is installed). Caulking shall be applied to cracks a-round all pipes and conduits entering and leaving exterior walls and ceiling as well as where. they pass through interior walls to attics and basements. A fireproof seal sha11 be installed. around furnace, boiler and water heat vents and around chimneys where they pass through walls and floors. Blower-Door Testing To verify that tight construction is achieved, each dwelling unit will b2 blower-door test=_d, by an independent contractor, immediateay after drywall installation, the ,building contractor shall perform additional caulking or other procedures as required to attain 3 air changes per hour at 50 pascals. of negative pressure. A description of test methods _ and a list of local contractors is available from the city. .The preceeding pressurization standard is commonly achieved in new resi- dentia~ construction and should be easily attained if the procedures in the infiltration control- section are performed in a professional manner. Indoor Air Quality and Condensation Control To reduce formaldehyde concentrations ih indoor air, particle beard sha11 not beused for subfloorng: One kitchen or bathroom exhaust fan sha11 be equipped with an automatic dehumidistat control, wired in parallel with the conventional. on/off switch and accessible to the homeowner.. If the dehumidistat controls a bathroom exhaust fan, the bathroom door shall be undercut i;2 inch. ~auipment In general, the equipment .provided shall be of energy ef,"icient design. The following is required: Furnaces or boilers shall achieve a minimum annual `uel utilization efficiency (AFUE) of 80a and sha11 be controlled by a clock thermostat. electrical resistance heat shall not be the primary heating system. Where a forced-air gas system is used for heating, the furnace shall be of the induced-draft or sealed-combustion type. I S- i ~-- 81own type insulation sha11 be weight, not depth, installed and sha11 measure everywhere within lOm of the average depth. nttic access doors- must be fully insulated•and weather5tripped. Windows and Ooors Windows. and doors shalfi be energy conserving in design and sha11 b~ tightly installed with good seals. 1'he following requirements apply: 'dindows shall be installed so that they remain ti3ht whether locked or-unlocked and shall have a maximum air leakage rate of ,30 cfm per linealfoot of crack.. - Windows sha 11 have a maximum U-value of .35. Exterior doors shall be weatherstriAped on all 4 edges and shall have a maximum air leakage rate of .50 cr-m per lineal foot of crack. Exterior doors shall be protected by storm doors or vestibules. Exterior doors shall have a maximum U-value of .39. Infiltration Control In order to minimize drafts, heat leaks and airborne sound, the foiTawing requirements shall also b.e met: A plastic vapor barrier, ~ mils or thicker, must be installed on the warm side of insulation in walls, ceilings and under concrete slabs. Seams must be lapped at least ?6" and sealed with acoustical sealant. ;he memarane must not be punctured during construction. _xterior caulk shall be fully compatible with adjoining materials and shall have a minimum nominal Iifetime of ten years under con- - di ti ohs of use. Gaps around window and door frames snail be 5231ed and insulated. Sill sealer shall be used below all exterior sill piates. Faceplates for electrical outlets and switches on exterior walls must be equipped. with gaskets. Holes where wiring and plumbing penetrate upper and lower wall piates shall be caulked (for both exterior and interior partitions). Oucts partially formed by joist spaces shall not be used. /S ~3 Ductwork should not be placed in exterior walls or attics but where such location is unavoidable, ducts must be fully insulated and sealed (use. "hardcast" or silicone sealant, not duct tape}. Kitchen ranges shall use electricity rather than natural gas. Hot water heaters shall be rated and labeled to meet Asfi roe Standard 9QA-198fl. Plumbin Plumbing should not be placed in exterior walls but where such location is unavoidable, the pipes must be protected with a minimum of R15 insula- tion (such as 2 inch thick foil-faced isocyanurate). Flow restrictors shall be installed on each shower-head.' Fireplaces Where installed, fireplaces,.must meet the following requirements. Both the fireplace and the chase shall be fully insulated. A tight-damper shall be provided for the fresh air intake and tie flue. Tightly-fitting glass doors shall be installed. Heat recirculating features are required. Energy-Related Design Recommen~a ions The following recommendations reflect preferences in some additional areas of building design relating to energy conservation. These are offered as suggestions ra her than requirements. The heating system should be sized to closely match design heating loads; avoid. excessive oversizing. Locate- glazing toward the south and away from the north. To reduce suttttrter cooling requirements, windows, skylights and sliding glass doors. facing toward the eas and_west should be minimized and/or should be protected from summer sun by plantings cr by other shading methods. Large areas of glass facing south should be shaded r"rom the summer sun. Roof overhangs are a common method. Design for cross-ventilation within living areas.. Minimize light fixtures and convenience outlets in upper level ceilings and exterior walls. • • C~ is-~y 921 Rae Drive Richfield,MN.55423 April 18,1985 Rick Jopke City Planner City of Richfield Richfield,MN.55423 Dear Mr.Jopke, This letter is to confirm your notice of the Planning Commission meeting on April 23,1985 at 7:30 P.M. Our concern and worry is the Planned Unit Development area to surround our property. It was our understanding at the last meeting of the HRA and Planning Commission that no more than 2 duplexes be built at 1016 W.66th St. We don't want to agree to this--2-2 family duplexes and then find that the developer because of the PL'D says,"It is economically unfeasible" for him to build only 2 duplexes on this lot. Also, we feel that if 2 duplexes are built at 1016 W.66th St. we will have a worse problem with run-off water because of the larger roofs and the run-off that will occur on our property. Our lot is much lower than the land at 1016 W.66th St.In fact, there is a ~ foot retaining wall along the south line of our lot. Yours very truly, Anne C.Burkhardt (i~rs.Edwin H.Burkhardt) ly- 1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 185 Agenda May 13,.1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ordinance Amendment Concerning Individual Air Conditioner Units in Multi-Family Structures Over Three Stories in Height. Council Members: On March 11, 1985, the city council referred a proposed ordinance to the planning commission for consideration and recomendation. The ordinance would regulate individual air conditioners in multi-family residential structures over three stories in height. The proposed amendment would prohibit the use of individual air conditioning units unless the applicant could demonstrate to the satisfaction of the council that: (1) The use of the units would not impair the architectural integrity and external appearance of the buildings; (2) The units would not be located in such a manner as to discharge condensation upon persons occupying other dwelling units in the building; (3) The units would not cause staining or leaching of the exterior building surfaces by the discharge of condensation upon the exterior of the building; and, (4) The units would r.ot be located in such a manner as to generate noise levels which would disturb the peace ar.d quiet of persons occupying other dwelling units in the building or adjacent buildings or persons using areas adjacent to the building which were designed for such type of use. The planning commissior, reviewed the proposed ordinance and determined that, ir. their opinion, an ordinance or. this subject is not necessary. The commission felt that any r.ew development which would be over three stories ir. height would also have over 17 dwelling units and would have to be developed as a PUD. If the council felt that individual air conditioner units proposed in a PUD would pose a public welfare problem, stipulations could -2- i y- a-- be placed on the PUD approval to minimize the problem (the proposed ordinance amendments would not apply to PUDs). The planning commission was also concerned about the effect of the ordinance amendments on existing development such as Richfield Towers and if they would become non-conforming uses. The commission did not conduct a formal public hearing on this matter, but indicated they would if they were directed to do so by the council. City staff discussed this issue with the Lake Shore Drive condomimium management. Staff was told that the Lake Shore Drive condominium has had some problems because they do not have individual air conditioning units. Some people want, or need to have, (hay fever, asthma, etc.) units cooler than others. If central air conditioning is used, such as that the Lake Shore Drive Condominium, individual needs cannot be met. Individual control is important in housing for the elderly. In addition, the developers of Woodlake Point condominium were asked for their opinion. A copy of their reply, giving reasons why individual air conditioning units are advantageous, will be available for Monday night's council meeting. If the council wishes to pursue this ordinance amendment further, it recommended that the council give first reading approval to .the attached ordinance and schedule the public hearing for June 10, 1985• Respectfully submitted, c--; ; `~. ohn G. Ca twr ht City Manager JGC/eja ~y-3 A'nend.,:ent to Chapter III, Part IV o` the Ordinance Code ci the City o RichField C=?"~ Cr EIC~_ IELD DOES ORDAIN Chapter III, Past IV of the Ordinance Ccde e~ the City o R1. C:1~le1d e:lt_ :~ ed '~ ZCn::7C~ Re~~~ a~iOn~ 15 a.*~:ended 1,~ ~ ~° ~O"_OGi- ing resaec~s: .~ 1 . SeCLIOP_ j . ~ ~ `.:lef'e0I ISa'Ile"' °L: `J~f 3Cid~'^.~ Cola 1 Oi:CW~"~', "°W s~c~ivisicn thereto: Subd. 6A. Ai- Conditior_inc Ur_i~s. In cyan*inc a special use Legit cursuan- ao Secticr. 3 39, SL;DG_J=510.^. o= ~^e code De_'~u_~-~nC ? TOG..iCZ-lOn LO .he heiC:~t °r-*,j~ eIIleP_~S CO:i'3 ^°_d _?7 tn13 Cf:d:,ter aDDi~.C3J! e CO ~eSlCentld''_ S";±CL':reS, ne COl2nC;.1 IIlaV, a5 a concition CO SL'CIl aDLrCVaI,^.rOP1:~1= ~;le GSe C~ :ndi- V1CLlal alr COP_Qltioninc ll ni~5 ~s.^.~ eSS ~P_e ?DD11CGi,~ C.e^OnSDrdLeS t0 tt"ie SdtiS=aCt~On G~ she COl:nC? 1: (a) The L'Se Oi sL1Ch L'nit5 Wi ~ nC~ -:::,ai .he ~.=C:?"?CtLl;al 1nt2Cr LV ~_nG ex-e-nai a'JL'ear3iCe 0- :e ,:,ll1~ C~nG ~~'J~ T~'?8 U':a:.S w7.' 1':CL ~2 OC2t~C' .':L'C^ _ ;ifc?'.nSr SS `,C Q~SC.^.ci ~_e :J:'?Qe:''.Sc~e ~~ ~„~ :~Z.''5~::'S :C~^.L1DV::''~ -rcr uWe1! ' :_2 ~fi= ~S ~ .^.e ~U; ":~ CC' .:rCn %r=c5 `'.^.^ic_ occuo;e:' w ~ersc^s; (c) The 'snits w; , ^c sta'_ c= eac^ -^e ex:e-_cr ^,,:~ -:c sur=aces by isc:^ ce c= ccr_c_-.sa-e (d) The r~~..s :~_' ~ not he loca-ed suc^ = yar'-er as _G Generate :.O~Se _eve_s :JI'1...__ a_e ,_:te_v .O C;= _.r_.. C_.e Tani- li 5 ..^. '15 e . li. SeCt10n ? . =Ci ~ ie_SC_ ~5 a:aenC?G ;V aCG_n''" he.etC the 7 _`C11CW;nC aeW ~arar.~pi, `0 511 Q='v ~5~.0:: j .^er°O=. ('~') In C~Z_^.~~.^_C ? ~7~~_~._Ce ':O `_:~e .'_°_~CL:'_ ~°C:._rem°*'-5 COnta~^eC ;n ':i? S ^aDye'" ?^,:~_ a0_e .0 ~e5 Ce^- - S- .,C-- -Y~S- ..he COLnCl ^;c` ? S d "'..^.d .^,^, :'.O Si: C.^, =DD-O~i : :C:^ - - .e r L'Se C= ,ClV '~~'_ 3 CO^.G~'~Oi' "C l:: WSJ ':? °SS :'e -Ypl` ---;, _ ~ ... ~ deli:OnS'"d-SS CC - Sat~.5~3C" C- ~:^e COL'~C~ ~~i-v a) The use or such units wit not im~ai_ '-he a_chi~ectu_a1 l;:LeQ~~ty '~nC eX~e?':'lc' Z^.de~=~^:Ce C'. ~.L'ie C1:1!Q~nC; (D) T.ie U':Ii.S W.1''?C`. :,e ~CC3`.2':.! :'. SllC"1 :'T13T`.P_e;' c5 LC QiSC.`lZr3° CnC'^.A"'S -` ..,nn cr` n yi ~^? ~;1ar .J c~ i:..~,._ D C,.S CCCUD QWe..' ~ 1P.~`UP_~LS .:= ~i1°_ QL'_~' ~^.'~=' C1' U':1CY! =r2=Sv:^C^^2i' y occuoi~ by ~ersors; l~:l `1'!7e LIP.i~S wlr~ nOt stain O~ I°dCn '^e ext°_'".v^^~ blll' di nc SCI`faCeS }JV d'_SCPa.Qe C~ CCP_CenSdte; (d) T`:e units w=~ 1 P.Ot be ~ OCateCa. iP_ SllCh a :'.'.c_^.:Ze= dS ~O Qer_e~ate nOlSe @Ve_S WL._C.^. d=e 11.{~_V ~C G;SL. ^.e De3C8 anc C::1et Oi. oerSOIIS OCCStiV~ '?Q . Ct_^_e'' ^W2/ .lnC units ? n tZe b1~,iCinc O; '`G't zCant bui ~~incs or tee, sons L1Sin7c±?aS aC+~dCen~~ tC Lne bu~!C._=iG C3.e51C'%eC. ~CZ" SllCn use. Passed by ~.he City CoLnci 1 0. the Ci`y of ~_c'r_,_e1^ .., '~~: nesota t is day of 1985 . john ~+. aril~ltcr_, '~lavor ~TT~ST City C=_~:~ 13-1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 184 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Free Standing Canopies for Service Station Operations. First Reading. Council Members: In accordance with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, an ordinance has been prepared to amend Section 3.33_ subdivision 6, paragraph 2(d), requiring canopies to be an integral part of the main service station building. This ordinance amendment will permit free-standing canopies for service stations. City administration recommends that the City Council give first reading approval to the ordinance and schedule the public hearing for June 10, 1985• Far a more complete explanation of the need for this ordinance, please refer to agenda item No. 12 which deals with a special use permit and variance request at 6545 Portland Avenue (Amoco Service Station). Respectfu submitted, oh r. G. Car wr' .t City Manager JGC/eja BILL N0. ~~ v ORDINANCE N0. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER III, PART IV, SECTION 3.33 SUBDIVISION o OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA City of Richfield Does Ordain: Chapter III, Part IV, Section 3.33, Subdivision 6 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield, Minnesota is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 6. Lot Areas and Yard Requirements. (The same requirements shall be observed for the "C-2" district as are provided for a "C-1" district in Section 3.32 of this chapter.) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subdivision the same minimum requirements shall be observed for "C-2" district as are provided for a "C-1" district 3.32. (2) A gasoline service station may construct a canopy extended into the building setback area of the lot on which it is located provided that such canopy complies with the following regulations: (a) It must be designed and constructed to serve as protection for customers and attendants from inclement wheather. (b) It may extend into the front yard area distance of 10 feet, as measured from the centerline of the gasoline pump island closest to the street lot line but in no instance closer than five feet from this lot line. (c) Only one canopy shall be permitted at each service station, unless it is located on a corner lot. i }~ - - -~-e-1`3t~-r~-ar~u ciz-e a-rr~ro . (-~} [d] The canopy shall not be constructed to a height exceeding sixteen feet. (~- [e] The canopy shall not be designed for use nor shall it be used as a location for any business or advertising sign of a permanent or temporary construction. -f-o}- [f] Lighting located on the canopy shall be designed as an integral part of the canopy providing that fixtures shall not extend below the bottom surface of the canopy structure and shall be beamed downward. {-i4-} [g j The canopy shall not be used as the location for lights or lighting fixtures used to illuminate the service station building, off-street parking areas or other areas not directly beneath the canopy. Flashing lights and rotating lights shall not be located on or attached to the canopy. -2- {~-} ~h] No canopy; whether it conforms with the foregoing regulations or not; shall be constructed in .a location or manner which will block or obscure the vision automobile trafffic on any street adjacent to the service station or the vision of an automobile entering or leaving the service station. Passed by the city council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of 1985• 13.3 of John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST Thomas Ferber, City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of Gity Manager l f..• Council Letter No. 183 Agenda May 10, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Hearing On Action To Renew Business License Shangri-la Sauna Council Members: On January 8, 1985, the applicant, Ms. Kun Cha Johnson, filed an application for the renewal of her sauna/massage parlor license. At the time of filing, Ms. Johnson paid the required license fee of $2,205. At the time the license renewal was filed, the Director of Public Safety notified the City Manager that the Public Safety Department was investigating allegations of prostitution related activity involving the applicant's business, as well as several other business operations in the city. Based on this information, the City Manager delayed action on the requested business license renewal. As a result of the Public Safety investigation, two employees of the applicant were subsequently arrested at the business establishment for prostitution offenses. One such arrest occurred on February 21, 1985, and the second arrest occurred on March 19, 1985• Based upon these two arrest activities, the City Manager informed the applicant on March 28, 1985, that the business license renewal application. would be denied. On April 4, 1985, the applicant, through her attorney, Mr. Stuart R. Perry, requested the City Manager to reconsider his denial decision. Mr. Perry further requested that he have an opportunity to appeal the denial decision to the City Council ir. the event the City Manager did not give favorable reconsideration to the request. The City Manager did reconsider the issues involved in his determination to deny the license renewal request. Based upon that reconsideration., the City Manager notified Mr. Perry on May 1, 1985, that he found no basis to change his denial decision. At the time, the City Manager set the requested appeal before the City Council for the regularly scheduled meeting of May 13, 1985• Additionally, on May 1, 1985, the Public Safety Department made a third arrest at the applicant's business of ar. employee for a prostitution offense. !I• ~ At the time of the hearing, the Public Safety Director and the Assistant City Attorney will present the position of the city with regard to the denial of the license renewal application for consideration by the City Council. Officers involved in the arrest will be available for testimony, if such testimony is required. The applicant, through her attorney, has been advised of her rights during this appeal proceeding. Res ectfu 1 ubmitted, ~~~ ohn G. ~Ca wrigr~ City Manager JGC/eja ~~ ~~ Cit O~ rIC~'1~1 ~ S d ., , } s7oo Portland avenue ~ minneSOta 55423 May i, 1985 ~ ~~~ Mr. Stewart R. Perry Wayzata Bark and Trust Building 900 East Wayzata Blvd. Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Perry: Pursuant to the request in your letter of April 4, 1985, I have again reviewed the circumstances which led tc my decision to not renew the massage parlor license for the Shangri-La Sauna, for which we have received ar application: from your client, Ms. Kun Cha Johnson. My rev-iew has included a study of the city ordinance code provisions which would al'_ow me to grant such license, as well as a review o:` the Public Safety Department arrest reports related to two (2) employees of this business establishment. As you k;?ow, our ordinance code regulating maSSage parlor businesses deals with the appropriate conduct of the business enterprise, as well as the ccnduc* of employees involved in such business enterprise. In this regard, the ordinance does not require a criminal conviction related to conduct which forms our basis for concern. of the activities occurring at the business establishment. The code deals specifically with the conduct 1tSelf and the 1SSUe of whether sUCr. CCnCI:Ct ShCUId SL'b jeCt tree licensed activity to dicipline. In my review of the two (2) Public Safety Department arrest reports involved in this matter, I am of the opinion that both individuals were arrested because they were engaged in prostitution related conduct and at the t;.~me of such conduct both individuals were eTployed by your client ar,d apparently were properly scheduled to be on duty at your clients place of business. As you undoubtedly know, one 3rreSt occurred on rebruary ~~, 1985, and the SeCCnd arrest occur-mod or MarC:1 19, 1985. I have just beer informed that a t.",~~rd erployee has been arrested for prostitution conduct on May i, 19?5. in view of the estab Lshed provisions o.` our ordirar.ce code relating to the licensure of your clie.^t, and it consideration of the three (3) prostitution related activities, to which I have referred, my recor:sideration of the issuance of the 1985 Shangri- La Sauna license leaves me with no option but to maintain my position of March z8, 1985 to refuse to issue the license requested. Telephone Numbers: General C.[y M~r.[er= (6121 869-7521 P~,,bi,c. ~are[y Non-emeroenc•1 ic4 ^~~I (6121 566-5061 PGL'C~ ~;NF 'MED,C~L EM~RGcNCY DIAL 9-'~ -1 ~ ~-'-/ As I indicated to you in my letter of March 28th, you do have the right to appeal my decision ir, this matter to the Richfield City Council. During such appeal process you will have all of the due process rights referred to in my March 28th letter as well as the right to cross examine any witnesses the city may call with regard to my position in this matter. If you choose to appeal this action to our city council, such appeal can be cor.sidererd during the regular city council meeting scheduled for Monday, May 13, 1985. If you intend to avail yourself of this appeal right, please notify me no later than Monday, May 6, 1985, so that the matter can be properly placed on the council agenda. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ,Sincerely, G / c cc~ iC [j ~hn G. Cart fight City Manager JC/lje ec: Director of Public Safety City Attorney li+ AauoclnnON w~rti W lLI1Al1 x. w,.~:~.~.~aN A7'IV(il(T! AT 1.AW STEWART R. PERRY ATTORNEY AT LAW WAYZATA BANK ~ TRUST BUII~ING 900 E. WAYZATA BLVD. W AYZATA, MIN NF~IYi'A 55391 (6]2) 473-0130 April 4, 1985 Mr. John C. Cartwright City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55423 Dear Mr. Cartwright: Re: Shangri-La Sauna Kun Cha Johnson lI-5 Please be advised that Z represent Mrs. Johnson, the owner and licensee of Shangri-La Sauna. This letter will serve to request an appeal hearing regarding your decision not to renew Mrs. Johnson's license. This request is based upon several grounds: 1. In the 12 years that Mrs. Johnson has owned the establishment, there has never been a conviction for prostitution. There have been only 3 arrests of which two entered pleas to disorderly conduct and charges were dismissed against the third. 2. Mrs. Johnson has done all she can to run a clean and legal establishment. It is unfortunate that two of her former employees are now charged. I will not pass on the merits of the offenses. I only wish to point out that you have taken your action before any adjudication of guilt which gives credence to the newspaper article I saw that said the City's intention was to close all saunas. 3. There is unequal and discriminatory enforcement of the laws in Richfield. If a store clerk repeatedly stole from customers (which I am sure you will agree involves moral turpitude) you would punish the offender. You would not order the store to close down, especially where it was not the owner who was stealing. Mr. John G. Cartwright April 4, 1985 Page Z~+o 11-.6 I wish further to point out that Mrs. Johnson is the only sauna operator in the City of Richfield that has shown respect for your laws by voluntarily licensing every year (in spite of your discriminatorily high charges). Her employees are all state licensed as further protection to society. Rather than be rewarded for her attempt to follow the laws {and Z do believe you will find commendatory letters in her file from the City) she is being caught up in a broad net because of the actions of two of her employees. I will ask you to reconsider your actions. If not, we will pursue our appeals as far as is necessary in the City Council and then the Courts of the State, and if need be, to the Federal Courts. Sincerely, Stewart Rte. Perr SRP:py cc: Kun Cha Johnson ~'.' AF.: is ~• li~~v~~~. :; i : f . ~ ~ \.. it ;. f`~ `41•:~ ' .«4%' ~~~'~ ..* N ^ tttttttt~ itttt~^~ /~ ^ itttttt~ U M 'Ct Lf) a Q~ C~ ~+-~ L Q. 0 O Cfl March 28, 1985 Ms. Kun Cha Johnson Shangri-La Sauna 60'20 Penn Avenue South Rich°ield, MN 55423 Dear Ms. Johnson: I I- ~ As you are aware, the 1985 sauna license for which you have applied has not, as yet, been issued by the City of Richfield. The delay in the issuance of the sauna license was based on information developed by the Public Safety Depart:r.ent regarding prostitution related activities that have been occurring at your business and were being corrsnitted by your employees. These activities include arrests of two of your employees for prostitution related acts. On February 21, 1985 at about 8:00 p.m., Allex Ann Larson, an employee of Shangri-La was arrested at Shangri-La for soliciting an undercover police officer for ar. act of prostitution. Then, on March 19, 1985 at about 7:30 p.m., Kyong Suk Stodolka, also an employee of Shangri-La, was arrested at Shangri-La for soliciting an undercover police officer for an act of prostitution. There_`ore, based u~or, these two arrests, I wish to advise you as owner of the business and property, that I will not be issuing a 1985 massace parlor license to Shangri-La, in accordance with the provisions of Richfield City Ordinance Code 5.25, Subd. 9, Sections 3 and 4. In addition, I also wish to advise you that you have the right to appeal my action to the Richfield City Council at an oiler. meeting during which you have the right to appear and to be represented by lecal counsel to offer any relevant evide.^.ce you wish to bring to the attention of the council. Finally, you hai•~e ten (10) days from the receipt of this letter to rec_uest an appeal hearing regarding my decision not to renew your license. Sincere r ohn G. artw gh City Manager telephone: 869-7521 (612) an equal opportunity employer CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager ~ j'~ ~ / Council Letter No. 182 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ordinance Amendment Relating to Control and Prevention of Plant Pests, Diseased Tree Removal. Second Reading. Council Members: At the April 22, 1985, city council meeting, the city council gave first reading to a housekeeping amendment which would bring the city ordinance into conformance with the Rules of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture Shade Tree Program and to provide clarification and ease of administration. The Richfield ordinance to be amended is Chapter Four, Section 4.11 CONTROL AND PREVENTION OF PLANT PESTS, Subd. 9. Abatement of Plant Pests Nuisances. Attached to this council letter is the ordinance amendment which provides for the following: 1. Adds the provision that notification to the owner of a diseased tree(s) on private property may be by hand delivery. The present ordinance provision provides that notice shall be given only by certified mail. The reason for adding hard delivery is t'r.at certified mail has been slow or. occasion thereby limiting ever. further the time the owner has for removal. 2. Increases the time limit that a property owner has to remove a diseased tree from 10 days to 20 days. This is 10 more days than currently provided in the ordinance and brings the city ordir.ar.ce into compliance with the state regulation. 3. Includes the provision that the city would have the right to remove the tree(s) within 20 days after the expiration of the 20 days given the owner if the owner has not already removed the tree(s). Costs incurred by the city would be charged to the owner. The public hearing on this ordinance amendment is scheduled for May 13, 1985• It is recommended that the city council hold the public hearing, and approve the ordinance amendment as proposed. Respectfu submitted, John G. Cartwr' .t ORDINA~'~1CE N0. AN ORDINANCE RELATING ~D TO THE ABATEMENT OF PLANT PEST NUISANCES, AMENDING RICHFIELD CODE OF ORDINANCES ' SECTION 4.11 CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: The City Council of the City of Richfield amends Richfield Code of Ordinances, Section 4.11, Subdivision 9 to read as follows: Subd. 9. Abatement of Plant Pests Nuisances. In abating the nuisances defined in this section, the forester shall cause the inf ected tree or wood to be sprayed, removed, burned, or otherwise effectively treated so as to destroy and prevent as fully as possible the spread of plant pests. Such abatement procedures shall be carried out in accordance with current technical and expert opinions and plans as designed by the commissioner of agriculture. Whenever the forester finds with reasonable certainty that shade tree disease exists in any tree or wood in the city, he shall notify the ~~~--~i~g p~~tr~~~t~ e~a~er i€ the aei3a~ee }s ea pef~lle 3~Yeet ~1$k~-e€-jaay; eY owner if it is on private property, by certified mail, or hand delivery, that the nuisance must be abated within a 3peeifled ~iaie- ae~ 1zs3 ~ka~i =1~e {~} da~9 ae~ x~eY° ~ka~. 1e:~ 118 } days =xeai tke date a€ ~a111:ig seed ae~lee- Af1e~ eke e:~p}Qa ~1ea a` eke ~e}die 11.rtt1t2d ~'~ cke Fez;°e7 fie ~a~ a9at£'. fie ?3~i5a?'.ee aid 3ka11 3A 36 'va~=k1:~ :38~ ~le'_a° =.ka~ 2~ide:3 ~~ 1~ J } u'au3 9= eke dale e€ seek ae~lee- 20 days of notification of the oroperty owner. If the tree or trees :nave not peen removed within the time period specified hereir_, the forester shall abate the nuisance within 20 days and t:^.e cost thereof assessed against the orooerty. Arv tree or trees wit: shade tree disease located on public crope_ty shall be removed within ?_0 days of entification by the =ores~.er. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, `~inr_esota, this day of 1985. ~~Iavor aTTEST: City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA q`~ Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 181 Agenda May, 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Ordinance Providing for Licensing of Parks to Non-Profit Organizations for Certain Recreational and Civic Activities. Second Reading. Council Members: The purpose of this ordinance provision is to license city parks to non-profit organizations for certain recreational and civic activities such as the use of city parks by the Fourth of July Committee. This ..ordinance will permit the Fourth of July Committee to authorize other organizations to sell products and use the parks on an exclusive basis for that day in question. This ordinance (copy attached) was given first reading at the April 22, 1985, city council meeting, and the public hearing is scheduled for May 13, 1985. R pectftifl submitted, (ter ~/~ ohn G. Ca ri . City Manager JGC/eja 9-a. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER IV, OF TSE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE. CITY OF RICHFIELD City of Richfield Does Ordain: Chapter Iv of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield enti- tled: "Regulation"of Streets, Public Ways, Grounds and. Places" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new section: 4.I8 COMMIINITY CELEBRATIONS &ubdvsion 2. Definitions ._ The following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section: (1) "Community Ce3ebration" means Independence Day and • any other. event designated. by .resolution of the City Council as a community celebration. (2) "Celebration -Site" means any public areas designated by resolution of the Council or in a license granted under this Section as areas in which the celebration will. be conducted.. --t• ma ~ c ~~,~~_,,-. ~r~~ ;" p°arl~ng a~~ - and s~~ ..a -~~~ a•cent ~ t~a~re;to . In events in which a 1 .. ,~ ,garade--~o.r ,~a,rc-h i~,s=,_ tQ = die ~~r~d~ted '"as -~~:zt o f tl celebration, tYae =<tE:"~n shall also include the `'`ate=~~~m~rch route . (3) "Celebration Activities" means all of the events and. programs designated by resolution of the Council or in a~ license granted under this section to be conducted by the City or licensee on the celebration site. The term includes the sale or other furnishing of concessions. " " s: ( 4 ) C~`es mss- _ . _ ..; ~~, ,. , s r s~.:4 ~~~~.$~ eons°~3eration as p~_t' `f~x~`t~e~- the 'celebration active-ties'. (5) "Nonprofit Corporation" means a domestic corpo- ration organized and existing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 317 (Minnesota Nonprof- it Corporation Act). (6) "Family and Individual Activity" means an activity involving a group of individuals or a family which has 25 or fewer participants. (7) "Group Sponsored Activity" means an activity sponsored by any group or entity which has more than 25 participants. The term also includes any 9-3 family Or individual activity having more than 25 participants. Subd. 2. Findings. The City makes the following findings as the basis for the regulations contained in this section: ` (1) The City owns. certain-lands which are. available for various purposes. including recreation, athletic; cultural and civic activities, contests, celebrations and .events.. (2) The celebration of certain events such as Indepen- dence Day forms a vital and valid part of the City's program- of public recreation and it is desirable and appropriate to designate-City lands and other public areas to be used in connection. with such community celebrations. (3) Sn recognizing the appropriateness of using public lands and areas for community celebrations,- it is necessary also; to recognize the need for planning and. orderly conduct of those events so as to maximize the public recreational benefit to be derived from such celebrations. (4) It is equally important events that limitations be the celebration site so as on the orderly conduc celebration. • Subd. 3. IIse of Celebration Sites. The use of a Celebration Site during a Community Celebration will be based upon the following priorities: (1) Community Celebration. conducted by the City. (2) Community Celebration conducted by a Nonprofit. Corporation pursuant to a license.. (3) Family and individual activities. (4) Group sponsored activities. Subd. 4. .Group Sponsored Activities. Group Sponsored Activities may not be conducted within a Community Celebration Site- during the Community Celebration without prior written approval by the City Manager. The. request for approval, shall be in writing and in planning for such placed upon the use of not to adversely impact ~... contain the following information together with any : other information required by the City Manager: (1) The date and place of the activity. (2) The times the activity will begin. and end. (3) The areas. within the Celebration Site: which will be used. (4) The .activities planned. {5) The maximum number of persons expected to attend. The manager will. approve the Group Sponsored Activity only if he finds: {1) That the activity will. not interfere with the orderly conduct of the Community Celebration. (2) That.. the. maximum number of persons expected. to attend the activity when added to the number of persons expected to attend the Community Ce1e- bration and other Group Sponsored Activities- previously approved. would not overcrowd the Cele- braton Site. The manager in approving a Group Sponsored Activity may place limits upon the number of participants, the areas of the Celebration Site involved- and. the time for beginning or ending the activity. Subd. 5. Community Celebration - License. It is a violation.. of this section for any individual or entity, other than the City, to conduct a Community Celebration or any of the Celebration Activities without having first obtained a license to do so. The City may license- Nonprofit Corporations to conduct Community Celebration Activities. (1) .Application for License. Any Nonprofit Corpo- ration wishing to conduct- Celebration Activities in .connection with a designated Community Celebration shall make application- to the City ..Manager. The application shall contain the following information together with any additional information required by the City Manager: (a) Name of corporation. (b) Copy of Articles and. Bylaws. ~~ ~ . (c) Detailed. Activity Plan (DAP) describing .completely time, location and nature of all proposed activities. td) If the DAP includes the sale of concessions, a 'statement of the uses to which the proceeds will be put. (2) Review of A location. The City. Manager shall review the application and. may refer. it to .any department for review anal comment. Following review, the City Manager shall make a report and recommendation to_the City Council. (3) Council Action, The City Council shall, consider the application, .the recommendation of the City Manager and may consider any other information it deems appropriate, Following its review, the Council. may either grant or deny the license.. In granting the license, the Council may modify the DAP and. place such terms and conditiars upon the license as- it determines advisable. (4) License Fee. Thee license fee shall be $5,0.00 which must be paid prior to the issuance of the license. 'The Council may, in its discretion waive all or part of the fee. (5) Precondition of Issuance. No license which has been granted shall. bs issued until the licensee executes an agreement .containing .the following provisions: 1. Indemnifying .and- holding harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim for personal injury, property damage or death, occasioned by or arising out. of the conduct of the. licensed activities. 2. Agreeing_to remove all rubish and litter from -the Celebration Site and to restore the areas to their prior condition and appearance not later than 24 hours following the conclusion of the licensed activities. 3. Releasing and discharging the City, its officers, .agents and employees from any claim or cause of action occasioned by or arising ' out of any action taken by the City to close all or part of the Celebration Site and terminate all or part of the- Celebration Activities in order to protect or restore order or end or prevent breaches of the peace or public order. 9-,6 Subd. 6. Effect of Issuance of License. The issuance of the license shall confer upon the licensee the exclusive right to conduct the activities contained in the DAP as approved by the Council within the Cele- bration Site for. the period of the Community Celebration. Except as provided in Subdivision 7 of this Section, it shall be a violation of this Section for any other individual or entity to conduct any activity contained in the approved DAP within the Celebration Site during the Celebration. Subd. 7. Licensee May Desi Hate Others. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to prevent the licens- ee, in the exercise of its sole discretion, to desig- nate other individuals or entities to perform. or assist in the performance of any licensed activity, provided, however, that such designation will not be construed as a transfer of all or part of the license nor shall it relieve the licensee of any of its obligations under this Section. Subd. 8. Other Ordinance Provisions Applicable. The activities licensed under this Section shall be subject to all other provisions of the Code relating to the conduct of such activities. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of 1985. John N. Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: City Cler.~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ I Office of City Manager • Council Letter No. 180 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Council Salaries Council Members: Chapter XII, Section 12.02, of the municipal code of ordinances, establishes the salaries of the city council and provides that salaries of the council members be reviewed by December of each year. At the April 22, 1985, city council meeting, the city council gave first reading to an ordinance amendment which would increase the salaries of the Mayor and Council Members by $700 per year. The public hearing is scheduled for May 13, 1985. Council salaries were last adjusted in 1978. The salary of the Mayor was increased from $5,670 to $6,000 per year and Council Member salaries were increased from $4,221 to $x,500 annually. If the ordinance is approved, the salaries would not be increased until after the Fall (1985) elections. However, the ordinance is under consideration at this time so that any salary increases may be included in the proposed 1986 budget document. A comparison of the salaries from six selected metropolitan cities with the salaries paid to Richfield officials shows: 1. Richfield Mayor salary would require a 11.8% increase to match the average salary for the position of Mayor; and , 2. Richfield city council salary would require a 9.4~ increase to match the average salary paid to council members in the six selected cities (see council backup). A $700 increase to the Mayor's salary would represent an 11.7% increase. The last increase was seven years ago. Thus, the annual increase over the last seven years would be less than -2- 8. 2~ per year. A $700 increase to City Council salaries would reflect a 15.6 increase. The annual increase during the seven year period since the last adjustment averages about 2.2%. The justification for adjusting the city council salaries in 1985 are: 1. The salary for Mayor and Council Members has gradually fallen behind the average salary paid by cities which Richfield has used as a comparison since 1978 and the gap will continue to widen unless action is taken; 2. The recommended $700 annual increase represents an approximate 2p annual increase over the last seven years; and, 3. The adjustment recognizes to a limited extent the change in the cost of living index since 1978. A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is attached to this council letter. This item has been placed on the May 13, 1985, city council agenda for second reading consideration. A majority vote is required for adoption. Respectf y ubmitted, ohn G. Car r g t City Manager JGC/eja AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XII SECTION 12.02 ~+ OF THE RICHFIELD ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 12.02 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield relating to compensation of the Mayor and Council Members is hereby amended to provide as follows: Subdivision 1. Ar.r.ual Salary The annual salary of the Mayor is $-6-;fr~fl [$6,7007 and the annual salary for each member of the council is $~#~;~$ [$5,200] to be effective 30 days after its publication. Salaries of such officers shall be reviewed by December of each year. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of 1985. John Hamilton Mayor ATTEST: Thomas Ferber City Clerk 8-y CITY BLOOMINGTON GOLDEN VALLEY ROSEVILLE EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK BURNSVILLE METROPOLITAN AREA COUNCIL SALARIES SELECTED SIX AVERAGE SALARIES ~~ MTGS. ANNUAL SALARY MONTH POP. MAYOR COUNCIL 4 82,490 $ 12,000 $9,000 2 22,380 $ 6,200 $4,650 2 35,920 $ 6,000 $4,800 2 45,340 $ 5,850 $3,900 2 42,640 $ 5,400 $3,600 2 37,580 $ 4,800 $3,600 AVERAGE SIX CITIES AVERAGE ALL METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATION OVER 20,000 $ 6,708 $4,925 $ 5,952 $4,305 RICHFIELD SALARIES $ 6,000 $4,500 8-5 ~- O O ~; U~ O ~ ~+ U] ct ~ ~ c' C r• m ~ ~ O f!~ c~ r+ ~ ~ x1 r• C7 ~ ~ cD r-J a b ~ `C ~ O c+ C• Z cD E w '~ cD Z cD F b r• Qq ~ ~ ~ r• ~ cD O C ~ 'a ~ `~ (D O O a ~ ~ 'Q (D G~ ~t o L7 O ~ (D C ~ ~ 'T7 ~-i r- r-' th ~. r• A~ L"i ~ QQ C C~ ~i ~C c+ C1 O cf P~ O ~ ~ CJ O O ~ r, ¢. x ~ x n ° C p~ a ~ ~ E-•~ ~ ~ 0 x C tc 0 x C a~ 0 ~ Qq ~ ra ~ C a ~ cD A~ ~ z (7 ~ C' ~ r• ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ a o ~ 3 ~c ~ ~ ~ o r~ ~ ~-] C r O ~ ~ n~~ O O' H CD ~ [~ °° W N N iA W W W N N ~A N N N N ~ N N N W N W ~ W W W N N O N CJ~ ~l CJ~ N W O ~7 rA N C9 CJ~ U1 w'~ O CO O ~] O O N F~ ~• ~~ GO O C9 N W 00 W N ~] N W 00 W O 00 F-~ CO O CJ1 CD GO 'A CO N f--+ W „~ N ,A CO U•i 67 W ~ W 07 F~ ~A GO CO N C1~ N GO N .A CO C.J~ CO O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O CO O O O O O O I•~ N N N N W N N W N N N N N N N N W N N N N ~ N N 07 CJ~ d7 07 b i ~ CJ7 6~ ~A ~ 6~ 61 CJ~ ~A CTS U~ "'~ ~ C O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O CO 00 W N N O O O O CJ~ O O 00 O O N O O C O O GO G~ O Cn O O Go O O ~A O O N O O W C1 CJ~ C`7 6~ O rA ~ C1 ~ nP 07 O Ui W U7 CJ7 ~ O O O O O ~ 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O W Co Go U'~ O O O O O N O O ~ O O N O O C O O GO L~ O 67 O C CT> O O >. O O N O O W O CJ~ C7t 61 07 ~A .A ~A ~A rA to 67 U'1 W ~A Ui ~ ~,^ 6; C O O O ~A O O ~] O O O O O O O 0 N cD 0 N 0 0 OD 0 0 N 0 0 ~ O 0 ~ O O 67 O O GO Cn O O O O C7 O O `A O O CJ O O ro ~ r-y r~ ~ c~ ~ • 7 O a ~ n w ~ 7 -~ -~ :/] .~ ro 0 c r H O Z O C t7 N O O O 10 ~ ~ 4-~ O ~A. O O N O ~ CD GO N Oo O ~. O O ~ ~ p O O O O O O Efl ~ ~A .P O ~ fA ~ r+ O _ .. .. ~ - - CO N W 00 rA N N ~J O O O W O O O W p O 0 0 0 0 O f~ ~-+ CO iA rA 61 .7 ~ W Cfl p OC 00 ~A N N O N O O O O 0 0 O 9 ~ ~ ~ r~ ray ~ ~ ~ ~ N W W ~ ~A ~A W iA iA W W ~A L~ »~ W W ~ W W W G7 W w'] r? Cfl .P rP C^, O 61 ~ CJ~ N ~7 O N 67 O 67 ~ 00 CD O rP 07 CO C7 O O ~ ~+ O •~• W ~] O O O O O O N O O O Ui O O O O C7~ O 0 0 O~ O O ~ O O O C O O O O O C.n O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N w W ~A ~A ,a W w ~A W w Ja c,~ .A W W ~ W W w ~ W w ~A rn w~ :^. O G7 ~ CJ1 N ~ 61 N W O 61 w'~ ~ CD O N 61 C'J 61 O O 67 F•~ O 00 N J O O O O O O O O O O Ut O O O C O O C O O O O ~ O O O J. O O, , O 0 0 Cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W W ~A `A rP W W W W W rA C3t .A W W W W W W CJt W W ~A 07 W W C ; O 6~ Cn Cl~ N N W G~ W O O ~ 0~ Cfl O 6) 0~ CO 6) ~P O O I--+ O 0o O ~7 O O O O O c~ 0 0 0 0 Cn O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O O O ,^ O O O G O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O r' Z z C C"' W rC O ~•C O ~ z ~ z ~ ~ ~ s " C >. r ~ ~ ~ ~ W O n r z ~: v~ O ~ k W S O N I W f. APPE,YDIX E CITY CHARTER ',~~` Sec. 2.05. Vacancies in the Council. A vacancy in the council shall b~' deemed to exist in case of the failure of any person elected thereto to qualify on or before the date of the second regular meeting of the new council, or by reason of the death, resignation, removal from office, removal from the City, continuous absence from the City for more than three months, or conviction of a felony of any such person whether before or after his qualification, or by reason of the failure of any councilman without good cause to perform any of the duties of membership fn the council for a period of three months. In each such case the council shall by resolution declare a vacancy to exist and shall forthwith appoint an eligible person to fill the same until the next regular municipal election, when the office shall be filled for the unexpired term. If the council' shall be unable to agree on an~appointee to fill the vacancy within thirty (30) days, the mayor shall appoint a person to fill such vacancy. Sec. 2.06. The Mayor. The mayor shall be the presiding officer of the council, except that the council shall choose from its members a president pro tem who shall hold office at the pleasure of the council and shall serve as president in the mayor's absence and as mayor in case of the mayor's disability or absence from the City. The mayor shall have a vote as a member of the council. He shall exercise all powers and perform all duties conferred and imposed upon him by this charter, the ordinances of the City, and the Taws of the state. He shall be recognized as the official head of the City for all ceremonial purposes, by the courts for the purpose of serving civil process, aad by the governor for the purposes of martial law. He shall study the operations of the City government and shall report to the council any neglect, dereliction of duty, or waste on the part of anq officer or department of the city. In tine of public danger or emer- gency he may, with the consent of the council, take command of the police, maintain order and enforce the law. Sec. 2.07. Salaries. The mayor payment as set by ordinance. No the next succeedins~ municipal e`er and the members of the council shall re- hange in salary shall take effect until 1 receive 7/26/82 sate may be This ordinance shall be effective upon passage and publication in the manner required by law. Sec. 2_08. Investigation of City Affairs. The council and the city manager, or either of them, and any officer or officers formally authorized by them, or either of them, shall have power to make investigations into the City's affairs, - to subpoena witnesses, aaminister oaths, and compel the production of books and papers. The council shall provide for an audit of the City's accounts at Least once a year by the state department in charge of such ~.aor'.~c or by a certified public accountant. The council may at any time provide for an examination or audit of the accounts of any officer or department of the City government and it may cause to be made any survey or research study of any subject of municipal concern. Sec. 2.09. Interference with Administration. The council may by ordinance establish a merit system in all or part of the city administration, but neither the council nor any of its members shall dictate the appointment of any person to office 7/26/82 CITY CHARTER E.3 CJTY OF RiCHF1El~D, MINNESOTA fixed by the council. (Bill 1982-19) ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 179 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Public Hearing and Second Reading, Transitory Ordinance Providing For The Disposition of Real Property at 6636 Cedar Avenue and 1825 East 66th Street (Municipal Liquor Store Site) Council Members: A public hearing and second reading of the transitory ordinance far the disposition of the above identified property is scheduled for May 13th. This letter requests that the hearing be continued to June 10, 1985. The City Council met with the HRA and Planning Commission on April 15th to hear a presentation and to discuss the redevelopment of the Cedar Avenue liquor store site by Lincoln Companies. Lincoln Companies has proposed the development of an office-service center facility. As a result of the presentation and discussion, the City Council took several actions. Lincoln Companies was selected as the developer and staff was authorized to initiate negotiations for a developers' agreement. Also, the Council gave first reading to the transitory ordinance providing for t'r.e sale of this property. The ordinance was also referred to the Planning Commission for their opinion as to the conformance of the sale with the Comprehensive Plar.. The public hearing and second reading was scheduled for May 13, 1985• Progress has been made since the April 15th meeting. Negotiations have been initiated with Lincoln Companies. The Planning Commission. found the proposed sale to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. However, negotiations have rot yet resolved the issue of the new location for the Cedar Liquor Store. There are other issues to be dealt with as well. More time is required. Thus, it would be appropriate to continue the hearing. -~- ~ a, It is recommended that the City Council continue the public hearing and second reading of the transitory ordinance until the June 10, 1985, city council meeting. R pectfu y fitted, ,~~~, r ~z ohn G. Gart fight City Manager JGC/eja rJ- 3 ,,, TRANSITORY ORDINANCE N0. A TRANSITORY ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6636 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH AND 1825 EAST 66TH STREET City of Richfield Does Ordain: Section 1. The following property of the City is hereby au- thorized to be sold or otherwise disposed of: (1) Lots 1 through 10, Block 1, Wexler's Addition, accord- ing to the recorded plat thereof. (2) That part of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 28 North, Range 24, West of the 4th Principal Meridian Lying North of the South 430 Feet thereof, and East of the West 125 feet thereof, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 2. Such property may be sold or otherwise disposed of by the City pursuant to and in accordance with a resolutior. adopted, by the City Council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of Jor.n N. ami ton, Mayor ATTEST: om erber, lty er -/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~~ Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 178 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Special Use Permit and Variance Request at 6545 Portland Avenue to Convert Gasoline Service Station to a Service Station Store; and to Permit Construction of Detached Canopies Over the Gas Pumps Council Members: PROPOSAL Amoco Oil Company has requested: (1) a special use permit to convert the existing building into a combination gasoline service station and a service station .store; and, (2) a variance to allow the construction of detached canopies over the gas pumps. The site has an area of 21,912.40 square feet and is zoned "C-2" general commercial district. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Section 3.33, subdivision 2, requires a special use permit for converting a gasoline service station. into a service station store. 2. Section 3.41 governs the issuance of a special use permit. 3. Section 3.33, subdivision 6 outlines the regulation for construction of a canopy ir. gasoline service station which requires that the canopy shall be designed ar.d constructed as an integral part of the main service station building ar.d shall extend from such building. 4. Section. 3.40, subdivision 5, list the three conditions which must be met for a variance to be granted (i.e. canopy over the gas pumps). STAFF REVIEW - SPECIAL USE PERMIT Staff has reviewed the proposal against the standards for a special use permit and has found the following: 1. The proposal does not indicate any expansion or structural changes to the building. The overhead garage doors will be shifted from the south side of the building to the north side of the building and the interior will be remodeled. The proposed conversion will not alter any existing setbacks, therefore, the site will continue to meet all the setback requirements. 2. Records show that the site currently has ten off-street parking spaces. The conversion to a station store along with two bay service station requires ten off-street parking spaces. The new use will not require any additional parking spaces. It is staff's opinion that the proposal meets the standards for granting a special use permit. STAFF REVIEW - VARIANCE Staff has reviewed the proposal against the three conditions which must be met for a variance to be granted and found the following: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting this land r.ot common to ot'r.er properties or similar istricts. It is staff's opinion that there are no special circumstances affecting this site. 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and er.joymer.t of substantial property rights. It is staff's opinion. that denial of the variance request would not be detrimental to reasonable use of the property. The existing gasoline service station use could continue on the site if the variance is denied. 3. That the granting of the application will r.ot materially ar.d adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to improvements in the neighborhood. It is staff's opinion. that the proposed variance would not be detrimental to the character of the area since there would -3- ra- 3 not be any substantial change in the structure or use on the property. The city has granted numerous variances for detached canopies for other service stations. It is staff's opinion that the three conditions for the variance have not been met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the special use permit to allow the gasoline service station to be converted into a gasoline service station store be approved subject to either the granting of the variance or that the canopies be redesigned to meet ordinance requirements. Since the three conditions for granting the variance have not been met staff must recommend denial of the variance. Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation that the ordinance be amended to .allow freestanding canopies. Agenda Item No. 13 is an ordinance to allow freestanding canopies. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted in favor 6-0 with 1 abstaining to recommend granting of the special use permit for the gasoline service station at 66~t5 Portland Avenue to be converted into a gasoline service station store. The commission also recommended granting of the variance for the detached canopies. The commission in the past has recommended that the ordinance be amended to allow for freestanding canopies. The Planning Commission recommends that the council approve the ordinance (Agenda Item 13) which omits the provision ir. Section 3.33, subdivision 6, paragraph 2d requiring canopies to be an integral part of the main service station building. Respectfu s mitted, 2 c G-L GG `z.~ ohn G. Car rigs City Manager JGC/eja vrc ~'.~r.~...~e~we.u---c "'~'""~'"^~Y'I""t""'!+` ~s ~"" ~ ~ ~ ` ~ Y + ~ J ~ Rn~a+~~ ._ µ-.. r - .: .. G s .... .. ~^ '' t - .. „.J1.- .rid ~:'F-. r ~ -:. ~"~r.'~'~.. '." ~ 'l4Ntttbl CGG~.CC~i Wis." 1' s /` ,.s-`:. '~` `;'° ~, 't ?` '~'' r'ZY+zFV 'w• itl~ +' `. ''.~ -"~'Y~S's:„+s,.~ ~ '...~W ~ r ff'ttJ.C Oily ~c,,~p~ 3 _ k _al- cf a .Y r r^o ~ ~ ~ f ~ +a x+~ ~ -- .r +1F ` .i. r ..~ f ~ ~ . ~ ~c t ~kY ~ ~ j,,{ a s ~i 8~.' f'~f' <fF+"x r ~t~/ G411g ~ Y t- !f . :~ ~i ar ._~,.atw•J.`i' ~ ~~ ~~~ ~z r~C ~~ T r .~` „ ~fi~ i ~ aC ; r f ` ~ t ~ ~n c '3+i'n-'~~ i+rarS- Y ~ ~ Cam. .,~. _ _ - ~ I ~, -^ 1 ~ '~ b yZ'~.'"x xz. _ } s - ~!~ - ~ a,~„ ~~. ~ - ° _ E ~ ~ t sit - - ' : _{ - g- - _ ~: .. _ ~ y~ {d ~c+.~J _ 't® twf.-'~L,: Ta~f~ •. [af a~tM+M~ S wfYau. i ;. ~ y `ara.. ~ o~tses+o 000!! /PGw. _ i ' ~ rawer y' . ye iMCU. ,o„ ~ { . ,~ ~ ~, . °~` !~ ~ ~ ~` ~ -~ LdxcsaRti \-~ - 'c-etesa. .~.. "± .T s~ ~ .fir-- Q; a '...°.~ r ,. .~ ~ k ~; ,. ~ _ r + -r ~ - ,,, 4 ~. `1 c ~. { SO~ ~~ ~t ~C• t' '. w:G+r~t;tu,rY. awe.aor~sr k F` ~"[~'_--- - ~- ..aroma,.:... a+.s. ,t .\ K -. '.. ~ '. r - `:; F '~ t t C t Fem. ~ ~ ~`; 'CSC... -- <~ ~_ ~~~. q 1G ~Y~.. is ~ t~;,~~ `in ~~ ¢..~ rt k p ~,. -. t~... _ r jvl . S t \ 'rte 4 ~ ~.., 3 ~ ~ fa Yes ~ ? 1 ..,,. ~~ ~~ T - ; ~ f KK s 1 -n,.t, -_ '~_ .-~ _.. ~~ - ~~- ^^+~we•.. :- ~'.-l~s ~':`,~ - :2~..s _ .."~~ _ 4%4 _ ,~."e .~•-.^~.-_ ew ~' ss r`,# -i;~, _ - y~F_ •':Isc s t :~..-1:.1.. !9 / / ~~ / f ~ 1 __. , ~" ~ :. DJ J ~= ~ Q' Sv, ice' 1 I~ ;: _ f ~" r. ~ i r _.` ,per-. ~ ,. ~ . ~~ w vJbS Tnn~ v~ ~~^~ `, '{" ;'1 ~ r 1 ~ L / ~t vii ~ ~''~ • .. •rs ~`:, c. 4 . - - i . ~ L r ,~ ' ' ~ y ALL P~OI~"`- 5~~ .~ - ~M CUBES ' AS.~ 1+#,' ~- 1~ ~ . , ~ .~ I~.MMMI~`. x. ; ~~.*' -t s~ .a. r... .. . f~ - 'S i ~~.... .i..,Z i ~. ~~k3r'° uR ,.L. •~ +, '.w ~~. °..'j' (.Oil!.1~ i f'+~pr!S2 k~~:+ e T c Z Q ~f J 4 ;~ ~_'. ,' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~ ~1 ,=- f- ~ _ ~ _ __ ~_ ,. ~ -- ~- . ___: ~~ ~ ~ ~ o .~ ~: ~ ~ f< z ~ ,t ____ -- ~; i ,,,~ r - - ~ - ~~ , . '\ i ` i 4 ~ ~ _) ~ ` i, ~ j, ~-~ i f ~ ~---' o i o i 1.3 _, 1-- t it ~ ~~ a ~ •. a ~J . -.. s ~ _ ~; r , ~.j~i a ~ 4 ~ ~. (~ • T ~ • .:, ~:- ~ s r ~, ~ (((~~~~ i • { , 8 - a I` 'I ~ • ^ U. ~ Q Gl `~~ ~ T ~ ~. 1...1 e ~ ~ ~Q.- a ~: ~~ ~_~ ~ ~ II • ~~ ^ ---~ - - - - - - - - ..: cam: _~_.:~::. ~i.. r ,~~•* ~...~+ r-~. a _ ,:, i 0 c~~ m~ ~ ~ ~ Q o"~ ~~ 0~ ~D RL ~S LAND USE MAP Q SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX COMi~ERG1AL ~-.~~w PU8L1C 6S#fi STREET • :.~3..3. a~ $~ N ~ - _i- ~.A.."i _ 1 ~ ,. Q 8, e ~. 7fih ~ Q ~„ s - ~ ~ 92 (1 .Q 8 0~>=~ :. _ A L~ r '~L-~. -- l~ ~ } ~ Z a I i ~~ ~ ~ ~~- II ~I !~ Q' i~ '~ ,~a `1 ~~~ ~ r~~~ >° Q ry A h i L___.~ ..'q /~- 8 ZONING MAP a R SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEUTIAL MR-1 DUPLEX C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL %% %/ ~ i1' v6~h STREET ~-- 't'S-'~'~ i3 ~" ~ H I~ O -_ 1 +r ~ ~ ~. .., tr ~~ ~ I 1 + ~ b . ^ + _~ _ ~ ~~, ; s~ -~..~ .~ ~ _ ~:i ~ O ~~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~" 3I~ ?{"~ lia ~u ~ , ~" i I • " ^ f J 1 1~ I ~ p J ., y 11y ~ r ^~ ^" i 9I8 , ~ w I ~ ~ ~ ~ ;a ~: ;,n U n o~~ ~ i~ ' a e ~ ~~ ~ ar, ~ ~ a ~ r- e b `.. _ S 7fi h ~. EIC Go i~~l IC~ 6J r. 1 la A a[ ~ L OF RICHFIELD CITY , MINNESOTA `~ Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 177 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for a Variance from the Sideyard Setback Requirements to Permit the Construction of An Attached Garage at 6326 5th Avenue Council Members: DRf1A(IC~T Mr. Dennis Rice and Mrs. Deborah Rice have requested that the city grant a variance to allow the building an attached garage just one foot from the south side (sideyard) of the property at 6326 5th Avenue. Currently, there is a 14 foot x 20 foot detached garage three feet from the property lire. The existing house is on a 10,256 square foot lot and is zoned as "R" Residence district. In the "R" Residence district the required interior sideyard setback is five feet. The applicant is requesting a variance from the sideyard setback requirement, reducing the existing sideyard setback to less than. one foot. The drawing shows the south side wall of the new addition as being two feet from the property lire. The applicant suggested that the cave overhang could possibly be on the property line. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Section 3.30, subdivision ~, requires a minimum lot area of 6,750 square feet. 2. Section 3.30, subdivision 5, requires that a single family dwelling in "R" residence districts have a 5 foot interior sideyard setback. 3. Section 3.~0, subdivision 6, lists the three conditions which must be met for a variance to be granted. __ ~ ~ STAFF REVIEW Staff has reviewed the proposal against the three conditions which must be met for a variance to be granted and found the following: 1. That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting this land not common to other properties or similar districts. It is staff's opinion that there are no special circumstances present on this site. The site is rectangular in shape, similar in size to other lots within the neighborhood, and within the community as a whole. 2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. It is staff's opinion that the attached garage could be built without a variance to the interior sideyard setback if the proposed design for the new addition at the rear of the house along with the attached garage is modified. It is staff's opinion that denial of the variance request would r.ot be detrimental to reasonable use of the property. The existing single family residential use could continue on the site if the variance is denied. 3. That the granting of the application will not materially and adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood ar.d will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to improvements in the neighborhood. It is staff's opinion that granting of a variance would adversely affect the health or safety ar.d welfare of the public in the area because of the close proximity of the proposed structure to the side lot 1ir.e. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of this variance request on the grounds that the three conditions for the variance have not been met. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of this variance for a sideyard setback requirement. R pectf 1 bmitted, ~' ~, v v John G. Car Wright City Manager \~ h_ ~, -- G ~ - i I ~~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ _ - ~ ~= ~ .i i \ i i ~ i ~ ~` i r ~ = \ I SJ ~ .f ?o ~' ~ ~ I ~ I i ~~1TF ~ - _J f ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~l~ ~~ _____. J I , . ----------~------y..•. ~ ~ i ~ -~\'~ ~ ~ V i =~S ~'J ~ ~ - _ { n _ ~ ~ - I ,~ -- - A a __ ~ '- b ~ ----- - - ~ -{~~- - --- ~~ ~ V~~ U~ _ = O ==-= ~?°aa -~ ~ ~ ~-3 S ~- ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 176 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Special Use Permit at 1916 East 66th Street Council Members: PROPOSAL Mr. Michael DeMars has made an application for a special use permit to allow an automobile frame repair operation at 1916 East 66th Street. The operation will not involve any painting or body repair. The vehicles are brought in from the body shops to straighten frames and then sent back to the body shop. The business would operate out of the existing structure, excluding the attached 24 x 36 foot addition on the north side. The 24 x 36 foot addition will be removed and the space will be used for parking. The one service bay on the westerly portion of the building will remain. The applicant proposes to remodel the interior of the building in order to meet the required standards of the building code. The grass and dirt area on the east side of the building will be blacktopped to provide parking and to clean up the appearance of the site. The exterior of the building will be stuccoed. The operation will be open. from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday thru Friday, and will involve three employees, including the applicant. The existing curb cuts will remain. ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS 1) Section. 3.33, subdivision 2 lists uses which require that public garages obtain special use permits in the C-2 general commercial district. 2) Section 3.33, subdivision. 3 sets forth the standards for operation of a public garage. 3) Section 3.41, subdivision 5 governs t'r.e issuance of all special use permits. -2- STAFF REVIEW S- z- 1) The property is located in C-2 general commercial district. Public garages require a special use permit within this district. 2) The existing structure does not meet the frontyard and rearyard setback requirements, however city records show that it existed as it does now since April, 1959. Removal of the 24 x 36 foot addition will bring the rear yard in conformance with the setback requirements. 3) The site abuts a single-family residential district on its north side. Uses on the other three sides are compatible with the proposal: a golf course is located across 66th Street to the south; a multiple family structure across 20th Avenue to the east; and, a general commercial structure to the west. 4) The 20th Avenue curb cut on the southerly portion of the property being extremely close to 66th Street would make turning movements to enter or exit the site very difficult or potentially dangerous. It does not meet the required 40 foot setback from the intersection. The other two curb cuts on the site, also located on 20th Avenue, are within 20 feet of one another to provide access to each of the northern additions. No curb cuts to 66th Street from the property are available. A 66th Street curb cut does exist on the abutting property to the west. This curb cut is physically accessible by means of a continuous bituminous surface. This blacktop driveway could be used for service to the building. 5) Off-street parking should not be a problem with this proposal. Available space on the west side (29.25 feet from the building to the western lot line) is limited to four parallel parked cars. Two cars could be parallel parked in front of the building with a 23 foot setback from East 66th Street. With regards to parking on the 20th Avenue side of the business, again two cars could be parallel parked to avoid manuvering within the public right-of-way. Therefore, a total of eight parking spaces are possible on the existing site. Removal of the 24 x 36 foot addition would allow thirteen parking spaces including the eight parking spaces which are possible or. the site. The identified need for off-street parking spaces is 12 to 14 spaces. The proposal provides for 13 spaces. The applicant has indicated that there will be 6-8 cars parked on the site for repair at any given time for approximately 24 hours. Most of these cars would need major repairs including body repair, painting, frame repair, and/or -3- 5-3 wheel alignment. Staff has concerns about the aesthetic appearance of damaged cars stored on the site. The applicant has indicated that cars will be stored in the parking lot at the north end of the property which will be screened. According to the city guidelines for parking space, service stations are required to provide three spaces for each enclosed bay and one space for each full time employee. Six parking spaces will be required for the or.e service bay and for the three employees working at this site. 6) It is the opinion of the public stafety department that the change in occupancy will require installation of an automatic sprinkler system. Inspection of the site indicates the need for some major repair of the existing building. (See attached memo for detail inspection report of 1916 East 66th Street by the Richfield Building Official.) Staff has provided the applicant with a copy of the above mentioned report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the staff that the City Council approve a special use .permit for ar. automobile frame repair shop at 1916 East 66th Street subject to the following stipulations: 1) The 24 x 36 foot addition on the rear of the structure be removed to make room for adequate parking on the site. A parking layout of the site must be submitted and is subject to Planning Division approval. 2) The curb cut on 20th Avenue closest to 66th Street must be eliminated. 3) The building must be improved to meet building and fire codes. ~4) There shall be no junk cars parked overnight on the site. Any outside storage of cars scheduled for repair shall be screened from public view and these vehicles stall r.ot be parked on the site for more than 25 consecutive calendar days. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commissior. voted unanimously to recommend approval of the special use permit for ar. automobile frame repair shop at 1916 East 66th Street with the stipulations recommended by staff. spectf~~ bmitted, ~/~ / /,/~ ~ l~~ John G . Cast/(w/nigh City Manager ~~• ` of ~ . .. • ~ T~ T F - r. I I - " I ~~~ - ~~ .!~ 1 ~ 1 ~i-, .. .3 o ~ - -. ~ ?~ ,n ~~ ~..r. : - f p j'. l •~ ~ 1^ CAST _ _• ~ ~ . ~1 y z 2 `~ J ' r =. o ? a', \. '~: 3 22 ~ ,;; .t- .. c^. ~ 3s 27 t~•..~ i o ! V ; ~ c , 3 ~ ~ • ~ .M • ~ --•6'/e~• I O ~ _? s• ~ ~ ' u i ~,~it ~ 0 22:y;' ~1 ~ ~` . `~ a) 3 2 i .'`. 4 M' 2J' ~~ ~ ~~ ~e - =3i 5 ~i ~g f'< . . ~ 7M - . 7 ' ~ 1 a C ~ \ s ~';tiy; 2 v~ 23 ;',iQ,s ~\ 3 •, 22;.ti;~. , 4 ~~ 2~ ;y ~ 1 'l ~• 8 E~ 1 ~~'. C S \ -,,; ~ 0 ~ - I ~ ye ~ I I . 4 `I%1> `[' - H iT ~ ,> ~,~: ~~1 ~ e mI 2V+~<<.~ 0 2 rt', '0 • .n 23 •;~ c _ ~.n 3 E~~;~. 22 "vt{1 ,;. 2 .?', G .\ ~ ~. .. 2v ~ :.~ ~3 - ~1 ~- ../ ~, . O I Iii E ' 4 , -- - ---^ k :~. ~ - .1 II 1 1 65r~' ; f. /J o , y 22 i~ .(. f ,~ a 2C ~,: _.~.. _~ t9=q: ~-, I7 `~ ? i6 ~ 23 ~ ~ ~ ~ -O _ rC2' ~ •. O ..~. 7 ~ f 1 ~ '~ ~ ~ ~~ _ _ !-. ~ ~~. ti ~` ~F 5 ~ 9'i~ ~ .. V ti ~T ~. _ t ._.~ _~ _.~ r ' ` ~ ~ i _~ _~ .~ a '' _ ~ ~ ~~~ o ~a :r: V J~~ ~; -:. ' 111LLL \ :•:: :iv y. • ~~ .. • LAND USE AND `" V~ - ,~; ZONING ~ ~' J o ~ ~~ o > O U ~ r, r-- J - ~ -^ - ~ - C ` •'^, i., _~ ~~~ii'r``:: GENERAL COMMERCIAL I',~ ~- ~. SINGLE FAMILY - ,,,;F .::: MULTIPLE FAMILY ~. /tii 1 _; ~' ~ ~ T i r ~t ? . ~ 1 '~- ` K].Y ~R fOM >~~ f_ANO SiJRV_YORS 3713 OUp~NT aV_NUe SOUTH 9lO0MINCiTO N, MINN. 55x20 688 208a 7 I +~~ 1 ~--~ Survey ~ cr: LOGIP~ 3ROS. P;iOP~'RTY ~-- ~ '~ /oy C'ia c~Q/ T- ~c / _~ j ~ j -X_ I ., c f~. :... n~ ~' \ ' J i --~ ~~ e r y ~'/'C!f C G Ir G ' ' f/ t , ~ Y `~ ~~ ~ f~ ~r Icr ,. ~;/ c, . __ ~ ~ .... t. U ~ - ~.. C ~~ ~ ~~ jL~ 1, I ~:~.' j :i J '~ _ v N " ~~ ~ ~ ~ /~ J ~ /,iii/// / / - T Js ~ `~ ~{ '~, //~ \ ~ %~ ~~ ~~ ~' j i ~~~ ~/. i~ d ~ ~. ~ ~~ a :^~ // ~ / 1 ~ "~='o i ~ -- .~ ,., .~ C~.6 ~,o,~ ~~ i. i j ~ \ i'~ ). `1 i I ~~ 'I I ;~i 'I :~ . ; '~ ~\j ~~ ,~, J~ I ~ ~ J ~ ,~; ~ I ~' ~,; :~ ~~ ~~ i I ~-- i `~~.J i \ 1 j'' ~i j' I .I { I' i j I ~~ ~' ~ ~% ~~ ~ '~ `, ~ ~ /~~~ 7~ ~ _~ uSSC,~I?TIO~;: Mike's Frame Service 1525 E. Franklin Av ~ ~ `„ i~pl s Mrr 5 5404 ~•/ To: Property owners and Tennants of 66th and 20th av. area I am currently in the process of purchasing the commercial building on the rdb,' corner of 66th street and 20th av. so . c s yov know, the building is in need of many repairs, and is currently and has been. for many years rental property and gone down hill. he propose to renovate the building to operate an automobile fra~rre repair service. I a~: airrently in business at 1525 E. Franklin av in I~ipls. and have been there since Jan. 1st 198C. ?h~self and two other employees start work at 7:?Oa.;... and close at 4:3Gp.m. 5 days a week i~ionday through Friday. tie <:re basicnlly a wholesale business with approxi- mately 5;' off the street business. Our business comes from auto dealerships-and independent bode shops who need our services. One employee drives our tow truck full time picking up and delivering cars tc and from our shop. ~~e d~ no painting or bode work at cur sho-;. Our off the street business is usuaL'~y front end suspension, wheel alignment, or wor'r. for someone who has hit curb and bent some of the steering pa:~-ts. As I ment.oned befcre, the building needs man-* repairs. 'we propene to start on the re;;~=irs of the building before we can mcve in and go to wor_~c. ltie will have to have the rocf repaired as it leaks badly and have the coupala re,-~oved so the roof is flat. The wocde.^. structure of thy, building will be tarn down and that area will be fenced i_r for the par'!~~-!g of customers cars. We hd_ll also have customer parking en the ti~est side of the building. The cast side of the building that has the dirt lot kyll be paved. ke feel this will be ..,uch cleaner and look aloe nicer. The wirdoj+=~ in the building will be bl>cked ir_ cement block and the front windo~::s to be in glass bloci:. The exterior of the buildinC k~11 then be stuccoed. ti~ith the new codes in r,~ci:field we ~+~ll have to install a sprint-ter syster., in the building. ~r'e will also be replacing the frflnt sere-icy door ana large overhead door on the 'n'est side. ?~e feel these repairs will i*~prove the neighborhood and help us run a more productive business. 4~e are looking forward to being you~^ new neizhbors. If ycu have any questions,, feel free to call >Y:i.ke's Frame S vice :.ike rein` rs ~/~ 1525 E. Franklin. av 1~'iPls • =~'~ 55404 872-1662 ~~„t S` J~2.; M E M O R A N D U M City of Richfield, Minnesota T0: Whom it May Concern FROM: Sivert Hendrickson, Building Official City of Richfield, Minnesota ~~"""~_ SUBJECT: Inspection of 1916 East 66th Street, Richfield, Minnesota. The north portion of this building is in advanced state of disrepair as follows: The entire north wall is rotting at the base plate. Both the southeast and the southwest corners of the building are rotten. The balance of the walls are sheathed inside and out and the condition cannot be determined without removal of sheathing. All rotting members must be replaced. The roof needs reinforcing. There is evidence of the roof leaking (stained roof boards and rafters). The siding has deteriorated to the extent that it must be replaced in it's entirety. Windows and doors must be replaced. Walls must meet the fire resistive requirements of the code when re-constructed (1 hour fire re- sistive). Roofing must be fire retardant. It appears that a structural column has been removed. The east wall of the south portion (masonry building) has an area that has moved laterally about ~". This must be corrected by re-aligning the wall and reinforcing it properly. A structural engineer must prepare a plan of repairs for approval. The bathrooms must be upgraded as to be sanitary and in good repair with proper ventilation. The heating system must be evaluated for specific use that may be proposed. The roof on this portion of the building shows evidence of leaking in several areas and needs replacement. Upon replacement, a fire retardant roof is re- quired and the roof insulated to the present energy code requirements (R=16.6). Exits must be evaluated based on proposed use. Electrical wiring must be evaluated based on proposed use. A change in occupancy (UBC Section 505) will require compliance as for a new building. 5- 7 Q~ P'S` c Q- y CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 175 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Planned Unit Development Plan Amendment for First Western Bank 6500 Nicollet Avenue. Second Request for Deferral. Council Members: The City Council previously continued the public hearing on this matter because the Planning Commission had deferred its action on the matter at the request of the applicant. The applicant has, for the second time, requested deferral of this matter to allow time to address the concerns of the owners of the HUB Shopping Center. The Planning Commission will be considering this matter on May 28, 1885• First Western Bank has proposed relocating their driveup service window to the south side of their bank building. It is recommended that the council continue the hearing on the matter until June 10, 1985• Respectfu~'ly " bmitted , ((~~ ~hn G . Ca twr i .t City Manage JGC/eja 3-I CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 174 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Requests for Variance and Special Use Permit at Walser Buick, 7745 Penn Avenue Withdrawn Council Members: Walser Buick applied for a special use permit and variance to expand the Walser Import building at 7745 Penn Avenue to help alleviate a space problem they have. However, they have withdrawn this request because of the cost to install sprinklers as required by the building code. The building and fire prevention codes provide that when an addition of more than 3,000 square feet is added to a commercial building, both the addition and the existing structure must be improved with a sprinkler system. They have instead decided to invest $50,000 into remodeling the existing building to meet their needs. They have indicated that if the remodeling does r.ot sufficiently solve their space problem they will reapply ,for the special use permit ar.d variance to expand the building. A public hearing notice concerning this matter was published in the Richfield Sun for the May 13, 1985, meeting. The appro- priate action to take on this item is to advise interested persons at the hearing that the matter has beer. withdrawn and no action will be taken at this time. City staff should be directed to inform residents who previously received a legal notice concerning this item that the matter has been withdrawn by the petitioner. Re~ectfu~y) submitted , Corn G. Car~rig City Manager JGC/eja CHAPTER III ~~, Z BUILDING, HEALTH, ZONING ARID LAND USE REGULATIONS J ~..) PART I. BUILDING AND MECHANICAL REGULATION. 3.01. SCOPE OF CHAPTER. The purpose of this chapter is to provide minimum standards to safeguard life and limb, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and oc- cupancy, location and maintenance of all buildings and structures within the city and certain equipment specifically regulated herein. 3.02. ADOPTION OF MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE AND UNIFORM HOUSING CODE. Subdivision 1. Building Code. The Minnesota State Building Code, one copy of Wh1Ch 1~ nn. f; 1 a i`n, ~};° n,~~ircZ ^.Ji ~r'.'.`~ ~i~.`J ~~i`~i~£~, }iiaj uc~it a21'Tf[~~"E~ ~ 'Lr11nn. Stat. 16.851 (1971) as a uniform building code applicable throughout the state. Such code is hereby confirmed as the building code of the City of Richfield and incorporated in this chapter as completely as if set out in full. Subd. 2. Adoption by Reference. The 1980 edition of the State Building Code as amended adopts by reference certain codes, appendices, standards and supple- mental materials. The following codes, appendices, standards and supplemental materials are hereby adopted .by reference and incorporated into this section as if fully set out at this point: (1) 1982 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, identified as "UBC"; (2) 1981 Edition of the National Electric Code, identified as "NEC"; (3) 1978 American national Standard Safety Code for Elevators, Dumbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks, identified as ANSI A17.1-1978 and Supplement, ANSI A17.1a-1979. (4) 1979 Minnesota Plumbing Code identified as MHD 120 through MHD 135. (5) "Flood Proofing Regulations", June 1972, Office of the Chief of Engineers , U. S . Ar*ny . (6) 1976 Minnesota Heating, Ventilating, Air_ Conditioning and Refrigeration Code, identified as SBC 7101 through SBC 8505. (7) 1984 Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning and Development, Energy Division rules, 2 MCAR 1.16007-1.16008. (8) 1982 State of Minnesota Manufactured ;come Rules identified as 2MCAR 1.90450, installations and related definitions in 2MCAR 1.90103. (9) Standards of Performance for Solar Energy Systems and Subsystems applied to Energy Need of Buildings, 1977 Edition, identified as 2MCAR 1.16101 through 2MCAR 1.16108 (10) Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters, identified as Minnesota State Building Code Appendix A. (11) Variations in Snow Loads, identified as Minnesota State Building Code Appendix B. (12) Minnesota State Building Code Appendix C. Abbreviations and addresses of Tarhni ~nl (lrneni o~ti,-,"~ (14) (15) 19d2 Unifor-n Building Code Appendix Chapters 1, 35, 55. Minnesota Plumbing Code Appendices B, C and D. Bi11 1984-5 (2/27/84) ORDINANCE CODE 2/27/84 23 CITY Of RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA - . - _ - J Department of Administration •Building Codes and Standards Division • - Adopted Rules Governing Amendmentsto the State Building Code Entitled Proposed Options! Appendix E Automatic Fire Suppression Systems Rile as Adopted 11C.~K ~ 1.1111):(1 Ul,tiunal I,rmi,iun, (ur uttitallatuat ul ,at-pn'ntt,cs tiro wl,prc~siun ~tatcrn~. :\. 1'ur~u,r. lht, ruk :nnh,~rtir, „I,I,,,n:rf (,f,Nl,run, Iur Ihr tmt.,IL,U,+n ut un-t,remr,r, firr ,ul,{,rr„iun ,\,tem, m nru Cc+n,tnr~ttun. Il r, utlert.Jr.f 1,, :,Ile, t,,tr nlrrra,in_ il~nt,,nJ, Iur a,IJtUunal hte ,ul+l,re„u,n r~,uurcr, h.:,Ih,,~,n~ ., n:unt~tl,.,lu) t.. a,iultt Ihr uPt,unal rru\ t,iun, ul Iht, ntlr h;t,r~1 un t1, I,><:,1 hrr ,u{+~,re,,,utt ~.th:,hriurr.. ' It ~tunr:,t,:,l ,q,u„n. l l,c ,t,rn,l,l~r ,,,t~•n, rcyuncn,cnt, m (•. nc„ h~• aJu~,1cJ "nh ~' .. h ,l etttttuir~,tltl\ II Iltr\ ate .r~ut,teJ. ihr reyuirrntrnl, are :,I,ttli~ahlr IhruuLhuu! Ihr mttnKiltalu~ li,r nr\~ hutl;lutC ~ u`i~' ~ ,n,l hutl~rnc, I,,r ,,.hr~h the u~eur.tne~ cl:,,,iJi~:u,t+n t, ~hancrtl. (. Kryunentcnt,..~iutumuue ,~rtnhlrr ,\,tent. mu,t hr trr,ta{Ir,l an.l m:unt.unrJ m ulterahlr ~unJiUun to htnlJum, rn the ,+~.u(~;ut, ~ ~t:,,,,lt;auun, lr,tr~ in I.-I'. I hi, reyutrrntrnt t, in atl~Jniun i„ other mtntmum reyutrrmrnt, ,rt m Ihr ,t:,tr ruti,lute ~.aJr. 1 he hrieht anJ area inirra,r, (+ru~ rJ~•,1 +«+f in ,e~itum ~Ilh auJ III' ul thr l:nil~,rrn Burl.line (kale. a, :,~upteJ u1 the ,t,,tr htnhlrn_ cuJr tttra- Ar trf~rre~ arr a~~l,::,l-!r. hLiLJtI. 1. (;rout( .-~-I ,xru~,:utrtr~. ~. Gn,ut~ .~-_ t><ruttunctr, ..ith an t><ruttant lu:,~! of ?tN1 ur more. 1. Gruutt :1-_. 1 uccuttanrir,. -. (~ruut+ li- I ,cn to ,t,,Uun, a ith Z.UI)lt ur mart ~ru,, ,y. Ct. ul~ ;u e:,. nut inrJu,linL c.u,ut,ir,. ~. (~tuU(', {3~ I t+ail.lnl L:+r:!>a'• ,~~tlh ~.t)1 >I1 „r Ilk+rl' ~ft+„ ,4. R. ut~ :urn. h. (in,ut+ (3-'_ ul7irr, ;:nJ t,,„t-,re.mJ.,r\ ri.r„r,h,m, \~ith X.~11t1 ur mart eft,,, ,y. tI. ut arr:, ur three ur mart ,tunr, to h~rehl. (;nett, 13-'_ retail. Harrhvu,r. ur manui:r~turinL;rrra, t\ith ~.111)Il ur mart ru" , . 1i. nl•area ur three u ~' 4 r m,~re ,tent:, m X. I,rUU(, 1•-I ;tnd 1.•' „rru~:nt;te~ Nlth 2{,~(NI of mUfl' ,l'rU\, ,(~. Jt. In :lees of Iltu ur mart •tUnr, to hrtLht. riret+t lur Henna ..J.lun~n, li,at ,lu nut ut:te:,~r the t>`~itt+;tnt (ua,l ur ,rt;nUte:m11\ mrtr.,,e tllr lue lu•,tl. `r (iruut, I -t n~rut,an.ie, „rth ,u1 u:ru;,:utt IuaJ of in ur nu+rr. !11 (,rut,tt f{-3 u~eu(,.,neti', ,~uh +.1111(1 ur mart ~ru,• ,y. Il. ul area. { 1. l,n,ut, }Z-1 at+artnx•nt huu,r, \~ith X.StMI ur nu+rr Vin,,, ,y It. ui~.rrr., ur ,„th JNClInt~ unu, un there ur m„n• tkrun, r~ert~t that „hen thr~ arr nut reyurreJ h\ L'nuurm I3utlJut~; (~,nlr. ,erttun, 1X117 ur I~?I-', ur other tlru\t,tum ul ihr ,t:,1r huri.l,nL :,,Jr.:,utum.Ntr ,ttnnhlrr ,\,h•m, Ntthm ~twelltne amt, in anartrnrnt rt:rut,;uu'rr, arr cun,tJere~ .umt,lc;e ,.hen t+r.+tr~uun ,, t+ru\,Jrt) rn a!t haMtahi~ naom,. HuilJ,ne „nc~tai,, to iuncurrrn~e Kith Ihrtr inr cht.t,, m:,\ a~crt•t .,ftrtnatr ,\'~trnt• 1#+F }e~i~v tyrgs~}yy{w Nh1lh h.t,e ll,C nfUIe~1N+n C.l r,.th,hhr~ CCtUtv;tll'nl IU ,, ,t Ctil, ,~ht~h l'l,rnt,t\ Ull it .11:1 lltlat.l ~\.i ul the l~nrfurm Nutl.l,n~ CuJc. 1_'. (;ruut+ k-I ht>1Ci, anJ mutt!, with X,~ttl1 ter m,+rr Fm„ ,y. ft. u( area ur Ntlh Fue,I nn,rm un there ur more II,N+r, • - ... (CITE T S.R. 1519) ~ STATE REGISTER, MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1983 PAGE 15t9 . ~. ~: - a N-I CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 172 Agenda of May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Resolution Relating to Subdivision of Property at 6512-14 Oliver Avenue Council Members: In June of 1982, the city council approved a common element residential subdivision for the property at 6512-14 Oliver Avenue South to allow each of the dwelling units to be individually owned. However, Myron Gunderson, tY!e property owner, never filed the subdivision with the county and subsequently sold the property to William L. Peterson. The new property owner has attempted to file the subdivision with the county, but has been unable to do so because the June 14, 1982, council minutes do not contain the legal description of the property. The applicant is requesting that the city council pass the attached resolution reaffirming the previous council approval in a format acceptable to the county. Staff has included in the resolution the six stipulations which were apart of the previous approval. It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution. R~ pectf~l/l~submitted, Bohn G. Car\twri City Manager JGC/eja RESOLUTION N0: ~~ ~ ~~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6512-12 OLIVER AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, the subdivision of the above-referenced property was approved on June 14 ,1982, upon the request of the prior owner of the property, Mr. Myron Gunderson: WHEREAS, the City Council Minutes for June 14, 1982, 'did not contain the legal description of the property, thereby rendering the Minutes insufficient for recording in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles. WHEREAS, the subdivision of the above-referenced property has-been resubmitted for approval by William L. Peterson as follows: PARCEL A The North 29.8 feet of the. South 59.b feet of the North 875.8 -feet of the East 1 /2 of the West 1 /4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 except road in Section 28, Township 28, Range 24. PARCEL B The South 29.8 feet of the North 875..8 feet of the East 1/2 of the West 1 /4 of the Southwest 1 /4 of the Northwest 1 /4 except road in Section 28, Township 28, Range 24. NOW, THEREFORE,. BE. IT RESOLVED by the City of Richfield., that the division of the above-described property be approved subject to the following stipulations: . 1. No owner may remove or alter any intervening common wall separating two-units for the purpose of joining such units without amending the plat to permit such joinder. 2. Except to adjust for settling or lateral movement of structures, the boundaries between adjoining units may not be relocated without amending the plat. 3. Units may not be subdivided without amending the plat. 4. Common areas or facilities may not be subdivided without amending the plat. 5. Tn the event that any unit is damaged or destroyed, it must be rebuilt to the boundaries of that unit as described in the subdivision plan. _2_ ~ ~ 6. Common areas may not .be used for any purpose other than the purposes described in the subdivision plan and contained in the plat. Further, that a certified copy of this Resolution be submitted to the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County, Minnesota, for recording as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 1985• John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas Ferber, City Clerk ~~ ~' +: } n~ ~' y ~z ,~. k i ~~ h ~ . ~. 1}. ~,'' t a A i ~• << ~•. s• ' h r ~' L .~ ~', ~~ ~! ~,. HaK.~' . ~,,.." NARR1f S. 108RSON COt~PAAIES, lMC. a01 WC3t 79TH STAER ' 9LOOMINOTON. MINNESOT• SSa20 PNONC 16121 964•Siat CERTIFlCATE OF SiRVEY FaR ~ MYRON GUNDnRSON I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: PARCEL "H" The North 29.8-feet of the Sou1.h 59.6 feet of the North 875.8 feet of the East 1/2 of the West 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 0£' the Northwest 1/4 except road. in Section 28, Township 28, Range 24. PARCEL "B" The South 29.8 feet of the Norch 875.8 feet of the East 1/2 of the West l/4 of the Sou*_hwest Z/4 of the Northwest 1/4 except roa ir. Section 28, Township 28, Range 24. It also shows the location of an existing building. As surveyed by me or under ,my direct supervision this 14th day o May, 982.. nson Land.SUr eyor Minn. Reg. No. 5065. ~~n i -c - _-_- ,,,,. ~~o~ era ;' !. 7fi) '.. l .y ~ ' ':. -. . ~ i' It 1 :~ ,. }: ~' ~r t4 r ,. it ~' i ~. ~~1ei t i>I ~~~ << ~; t. ~~e i= NO.!'~-k°- 8X.0. ~'L :.: y '"`~ HA2RY S. 1OHIISOp C0?yIPAMIES, INC. - X01 W63T T1TM3TA[ET Dt OQMI+IGTO N. M1M r:E3OTA J9A20 •..e..c ~sls~ es.-s~.r CERTIFlCATE OF SURVEY - ~ FoR ~r~ou G~Nd_~~ ~~-: '_ 44.a - - -- 29.H1 ~ -- ' ~ I~ ~~ - - ' r ee.1a ~arric..~ ".._ 3q'i2 5Q. Fi:~ C.dj12 AGEcS 4.80 - -- 0 ~ ~ ~`, ~ e y' } :N t \ \ 3. ~.~: ~x t ~i 1--ci :... ~ (7U L~'aC _ _,,.,_ ~ J 1 \\\ 5 rvo•° --+ ~ ~ r ,~ ~ 9 ti ~ / ~ S ~, ~/ J ao PCoP..1;+s ~ rr \ \\ ~ \ ~~ .00 - a~2LOUDr-o:.:~ ; .~ ~T.Bt -r-2•~wa I,Gjaxs -~.-z5*.%?5 -= STao? rA N h~ 3 %tklrt.. ",g.. 3~Z2 5Q, ~~. o. D~ 12 ~G ~5 u ~ i y . ~ ~ ti ~r~1 / ~ Tf'l~~V '/~ ~~~` ~ FI 1 _ ~ M= ~ ~; a{ >v ~ ' . ~.3 - it y/i ~` \/ ~aG • 1 ~, ~ ~; ~.____.= ~ - - ~,~ .,. ..A ~. _____ .. . • ~~ Council Meeting Minutes -5- June i4, 1982 Bill 1982-17, "An Amendment to Appendix C of the Ordinance Code'o.f the City of Richfield, Minnesota", defining the boundaries of various zoning districts of the city, was read and reviewed by Citp Attorney Clayton LeFevere, the same being on file in the office of the city clerk.. (C--134) Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Bunce that this constitute a second reading of Bill 1982-I7, as amended;. that it be-pub fished in the official newspaper and that it be made a part of these minutes.. Poll of vases: Ages Bunce, Hassenstab, Kirsch, Ludeiaan, HamiltoA. Nays - None. Carried. - -The city manager presentQd an ordinance for second reading approval which would allow any lawful:, noncanforming single family residential use in as R-1 zone,which existed at the time of the adoptiaa of the rezoning., be rebuilt after the occurr~nceof a fire or disaster.. Bill. 1982-18, "An Amendment to Chapter III Part TP, Section 3.29 Subdivision 2 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield", relating to nonconforming uses, was read. and reviewed by City Attaraey Clayton LeFevere, the same being on file in the office of the ctq clerk. (C-I35? Motion by Ludeman, seconded by Bunce twat this constitute a ascend reading of Bill 1982-18; that i.t be published in the official newspaper and that it be made a part of these minutes. Poll of votes: Ayes.- Bunce, Hassenstab, Kirsch, Ludeman, Hamilton. Vays - None. Carried. I2. Reouest *or Subdivision to Permit Sale of Duplex Unit, 6512-I4 Oliver Avenue Ms. Myron Gunderson appeared on behalf of his request to subdivide his double bungalow at 6312-I4 Oliver. _ Motion by Bunce, seconded by Hassenstab to move this matter from the tahle. All ayes - Carried. Council Meeting Minutes -6- June I4, I982 ~~ ~ ~` Marion b Bence seconded b Ludeman to a rove this subdivision sub'ett to Y ~ Y PP J tine following stipulations as Listed in Council Letter Yc. 193:' L. No owner may remove or aites any intervening common wall separating two- waits for the purpose of joining such waits without amending the glat to permit such joinder. 2. Except to adjust for settling or Lateral.~movemeat of structures, the boundaries between adjoining units may not be relocated without amending the plat. 3. Units may not be subdivided without amending the pint.. 4. Common areas or facilities may not be subdivided without-amending the plat. 5. Zn the event that any unit. is damaged. or destroyed, it muse be rebuilt to the boundaries of that unit as described in the subdivision plan. 6. Ccm~n areas may not be used for any purpose other than the purposes described in the subdivision plan and contained in the plat.. 2,11 ayes - Carried.. 13. Ordinance Amendment Relating to Bingo and Other Authorized Gamblinst Activities. .Second Reading. Citq Manager YoLleaberger presented an. ordinance. amendment relating. to bingo and other authorized gambling activities for city council second reading consideration, as described in Council Latter Yo, i8?. Tlsis amendment will bring the ci.ty's ordi- nance late caaformance with: state statutes as amended by the 1982 Minnesota Leg.islature_ Mr. Sid Sanford, 7000 Portland, asked. far additional information regarding the related sections of state law. Motion bq Buace, seconded by Hassenstab to close the hearing. 2,11 ayes - Carried.. :~ BiII 1982-I4, "An Amendment- to Chapter P, Part IZ, Section S.I9 of the Ordinance. Code of the City of Richfield", relating to regulating and licensing certain bingo and gambling activities, was read and reviewed by City Attorney Clayton LeFevere, the same being on file in the office of the city clerk.. (C-I30) Motion by 3unce, seconded by Ludeman that this constitute a second reading of • aU-i CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 171 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Permits for Illuminated Signs, Shakey's Pizza, 500 East 78th Street Council Members: Lawrence Sign Company has applied for advertising permits to erect the following illuminated signs at Shakey's Pizza, 500 East 78th. Street: 1-three sided directional sign, 1' xx 2' per side (6 square feet total). 1-pylon directional sign 1' x 2' (2 square feet) 1-menu sign with slide in panels 42" x 24" (7 square feet) 1-call board 48" x 24" (8 square feet). The municipal code of ordinances provides that all signs to be illuminated require city council approval. The staff has reviewed the sign applications ar.d finds that each conforms to all city ordinances relating to signs of this nature. It is recommended that the city council approve the applications, subject to the provision that each sign location. be approved by the city staff. R spectf. 1 submitted, ~~ '~ Z ~~ C~Z ~~'~ ~ohn G. C rtwr'g t City Manag r JGC/eja ..APPROVE DENY ~~ APPROVE ~ /. ~ +r DEivni D :_ -c ~'~~--- / City Manager Date Ins ector ~ ~/~ ~ A-?PROVE ~ DENY ~,_, i- 1- ,~~ ~ i APPROVE ^ DENY Date Planni~g,Department City Council Data '7 ~ l'Z~ Date Route to above for special approval per code General Signs APPLICATION FOR ADVERTSSING PERMIT City of Richfield,, Minnesota Date y- ,'1.5 - ~ 5' Zonin Sign Erected - .Yes No 1~ Fee ~j'~, ~-~ E:-~. , ~ Address of Si gn~~~'~_~~-.!~_--~-T Pro rietor Name , Ty p 5 ~- ~~ Jac'. y +S DBA Sign Erec~or~,~tc~/'~i7Cc'_:,~,`4'n~~hG. Address~~f~5 P`~~c~ j3;~T/~~ n~~ ~~ P~~~_y~.~~/a~ e of Sign Desi n ~ Weather Cover. LiQhtin~ ~- _ - Wall Single Face Projecting Double Face Ground Multi-Faced... Roof Aerial/Blimp Pedestal. Searchlight Changeable Banner/Pennants Temporary Portable Frame r Trailer T Q A ~ Post Clear Lexon Frosted- Lexon Plastic Covered Shaded. Neon Other ' Sign Colors Constant Flashing Revolving Traveling Zip Lite Other (Explain) ~.. Illuminated Yes No Watts Electrical Ccntraetor Address Phone Property Owner or his Agent Signature Phone d Estimated Cost 7~G~. ~ Sign Width ~" Height ~ ~ " Total Square Feet Position of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utility lines, vehicle movement Lines; or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions and attached hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page 2. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction plans: including specifications, list of materials, and explicit anchoring or fastening details and a copy of the .stress sheets; calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution, or activity conducted on the premises? yam' S Will the sign, structure, or billboard restrict any sight distance under, around, or over for safe access by persons destined for or passing the subject premises? /~,~~~ J~~?w'CC'•7Gc' ~~:~n5 ~~G i L 1~' CrY GG"i-~ C `'~ Applicants s Signature and Title with Firm ~ U Date y' c~`5 - c~~S ,'' ae Number l ~~ ~ - ~, 7~~ lkt 8/83 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN LOCATION SKETCH Sivert Hendrickson/Building Official - 866-5061 APPROVE ~ DEhTY ^ : Gity Manager Date APPROVE ~ ~ENYQ : c ~ ~ "'~'- Plannng apartment Date `~ ~1 ~~ T-i APPROVE ~ DENY U : ~¢tC~L^~--~_ / ~ ~~.~^ Inspector ~i*~•~ Date ~~~~~'~ APPROVE ^ DENY a : ~ ~« city council Date Route to above for special approval per code General Suns APPLICATION FOR ADVERTLSING PERMIT City of Richfield, Piinnesota Date ,~.5 -.~~_5 Zoning Sign Erected - Yes No 1~ Fee ~ / ~f; ° ° Address of Sign, r '~ Proprietor Name ~S h ~ l~"C y~ ° 5 DBA Sign. Erector c"~4J l'G/„1' G~ v~~~~/7c. Address~~/,g~~.~erC~ ~uT/e~' R%c ST p~~~I /'1~,~ ~.~5 /Q K"1.,~rc i :un ~ / r Tvne of Sign ion Desi n ~ Weather Cover Li htinQ r-/vrrc-s~~ Wall Single Face Clear Lexon ~ Constant Projecting Double Face Frosted Lexon Flashing Ground Multi-Faced Plastic Covered Revolving Roof Aerial/Blimp Shaded Traveling Pedestal Searchlights Neon Zip Lite Changeable Banner/Pennants Other Other(Explain) Temporary Portable Frame: { Sign Colors Trailer ~ T ~ A ~ Post t..i If .Illuminated No Watts ~..~- Electrical Contractor Address Phone Property Owner or his Agert Signature Phone Estimated Gost,~s, 0, a"' Sign Width ~~/~~ Height / a'~ Total Square Feet Position of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utility lines, vehicle movement lines, or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions and attached hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page 2. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction plans: including specifications, list of materials,. and explicit anchoring or fastening details and a copy of the stress sheets, calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution, or activity conducted on the premises? ~°. ~~ Will the sign, structure, or billboard restrict any sight distance under, around, or over for safe access by persons destined for or passing the subject premises? /v'U ~.~~ ~ Ap,plican ignature and Title with Firm _ r Date y ~- 0°1.5 Phone Number ~~~~ "" ~ ~~~ lkt 8/83 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN LOCATION SKETCH Sivert Hendrickson/Building Official - 866-5061 ' APPRi?VE ~ DEIv": Q City I~.anager Date __ "''PROVE ~ DENYa : ~t.~ ~~~ ~~ `,^~~,c Planning Dep±ar_tment Date `~~~ ~`'<~ c .APPROVE I ,{~ ~ DENY :_ ~~.-t~~~---+ 5`=~-j Inspector •tr$-~c' ~-c.~ti-`~ Date S~ u' ~ r APPROVE a DENYD City Council Date. _~ Route to-above for special approval. per code. General Suns APPLICATION FOR ADVERTISING P£R'KIT City of Richfield, ,Minnesota Date ~ ;~.,'S"- ~5J Zaning~ Sign Erected.. - ;~ 5 c.., ,~ ~ ,.• Address oz Sign,-~~~~ (~ _j Proprietor Yes No 1~ Fee. ~ 1 J~ ~ a Name <S /~ ~ ke Y' S DBA Sign Ereczor~~t~/'eh~~ ;~,`~r~S Yhc' Address95!.5 p`c~~P-RyT/Nr R%~ <ST,P~~/-/'7n1~S~S~% e of Sin 3 ; c~c~c~ Desen ~ Weather Cover Li htin, -Wall Single Face... Clear Lexoa Constant Projecting l a-Face 'fh~cc Frosted Lexon Flashing. Ground ~;~cc1"r'a~a/ Multi-Faced Plastic Covered Revolving Roof Aerial/Blimp Shaded Tzaveing Pedestal Searchlight "Neon ~ Zip Lite Changeable. Banner/Pennants. Other Other (Explain) Temporary Portable. Frame: Sign Colors Trailer T Q A Q Post ~ II1t~m; *+a ted Yeses No Watts Electrical Contractor Address Phone Property Owner or his Agent Signature Phone Estimated Cost L•• ~~ , d d Sign Width o°1 y ~` Height / a ' ` Total Square Feet ~e Posit.on of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utlitq lines, vehicle movement lines, or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions and. attached hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page Z. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction plans: including,specificatians, list of materials., and explicit anchoring or fastening details and a copy of the stress sheets; calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution, or activity conducted on .. the premises? C S Will the sign, structure, or billboard restrict any sight distance under, around, or over for safe access by persons destined for or passing the subject premises? A,~C . ~iv)f/J~/Y~ ~~:y'XiL~*'~t+ /CCir/l Applicant's Signature and Title with Firm Date y- .~._y - ~. s~ ~e Number y~~=- L 7// lkt 8/83 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN LOCATION SKETCH Sivert Hendrickson/Building Official - 856-5061 ~.PPRDVc ~ j DEyYu : APPROVE u City aanager Date t APPROVE ~ ~ENY~ : ~:.._ ~ ~r.~~3~t..~~ APPROVE a Plannin= D~rartment Date ~~i Iz'~ ; , Route to above for special approval APPLIC. city Date. 'y-,~~ ~. 5 ~ ~~ ~ Zonin Address of Sign y`t.70 ~' S:--~---~--~_ <s Inspector Date 7! ~~'s DENY : •. . City Council Date per code ~ General Sians ?.TION FOR ADVERTISING PERMIT of Richfield, .Minnesota Sign Erected - Yes No L~ Fee ;,~ `"f, ~ C ~~Proprietor Name _~ ~j ~, /~~,~~ 'S DBA Sign Erector~, ,3i,u/`~,~~p ~~'~n5 .~ hG Addresscfy5 ~p~fCr~ ~.;T/Pr R%.t; SST, ~'~v% Hti' x.5'3 /c T e of Sign. Desi n ~ Weather Cover Li htin Wall Single Face Clear Lexon ~ Constant Projecting Double Face Frosted Lexon Flashing Ground. Multi-Faced Plastic Covered .. Revolving Roof Aerial/Blimp Shaded Traveling Pedestal Searchlight Neon Zip Lite Changeable Banner/Pennants Other Other (Explain) Temporary Portable .Frame;- Sign Colors Trailer T ~ A [~ Post If Illuminated Yes ' No Watts Electrical Contractor Address Phone Property Owner or his Agert Signature ~ Phone Estimated Cost,~,~ yQG, -' Sign Width ~{~,- Height ,x y "~ Total Square Feet Position of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utility lines, vehicle movement lines, or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions. and attached hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page Z. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction plans: including specifications, list of materials, and explicit anchoring or fastening details and a copy of the stress sheets, calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution,. or activity conducted on the premises? ~C -Will the sign, structure, or billboard restrict any sight. distance under, around, or over for safe acces by .persons destined for or passing the subject premises? Jt,'~! Applican~ s Signature and Title with Firm Date ~- ~, 5~~ ~~'`5 ~ Phone Number ~.~~-~~' C 7~f lkt 8/83 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN LOCATION SKETCH Sivert Hendrickson/Building Official - 866-5061 .-~-- { ~, --=~_ ---~'_' i f ~. c; J ~a ~~ -~ ~~ .~ S ~C d2 ~--_ i --~ ~ i ~~, I ~~ j ,, ~~ J . ~ C ~lii ;; '!, ;; ,. ~ ! ' f 7 CC ci~ s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ YtJ ?D ~}- O ~cJ 1~ ~~7 uJ z ~ ~p Q '.C ~ t!1 Ll.: i ~J 4 tL f~ ~'; ~~ .~ 3 w ~~ z w +, ~ ~ ~ ~3 , f li ~ ~' ~? I~~~~~ ;l~~m~ o ,, w~ ~ s ~_ ~'~-J ~1'ri z,~ < < '' r '', J c;. ~ ~ ~~~~~IQ ~~~i~4~ liw~,, ~~~~; I~~ llv~<~ _, a~-~ c,n m a 'J ~ ~ ~r, i z~ i ~ (~ ~!` p ~~ ~ z -~ ~ c ~~m ~ ~- ,~ ,. ~~ I !. D ~~ C ~ ~~ i I~ i ~~~~~=~ ~~ ~_ • L~ J C ~0'~i~'N o~ t~ ~ - ---~-- - ~~~o~ ~ 1_ Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~z ~ ,~~' .-+ r 177 tt_ t~ ~4 ~i t~ 1 a6-~ ---~- ~:' _;;.~ . i ~t r-------- - - - ----- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA a ~- ~ l Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 170 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Permit Application for an Illuminated Sign To be Located at Community Credit, 6523 Nicollet Avenue Council Members: Leroy Signs, Incorporated, has applied for an advertising permit to erect an illuminated wall sign, measuring 20' x 1' 4", at Community Credit, 6523 Nicollet Avenue. The proposed sign conforms to all pertinent sign ordinance requirements and it is recommended that the city council approve this permit. City Council consideration is required by the municipal code of ordinances or. each sign application for an illuminated sign. R pectfu 1 ubmitte , ULv ohn G . 'Car wrigY~t City Manager JGC/eja DEh"Y~: AP-PROVE (~l I DE:~'Yu: ~ ~1~:...-~. AP qE City Manager f-' Inspector. ~ Date R ~ DEIQI'~ : Date ~~ . ' APPROVE ©~ENY ~ = 1,,. ~~. ~ ` ~ it -"~-''~ OVE APP .. T~s~ ir ncil Co Ci Planning Department u ty - Date ~,~;_ ~,:~" Date i ' Route to above for special approval per code General Si ns "` APPLICATION FOR ADVERTISING PER.*IIT ~~,,i City of Richfield, :Minnesota ~~ `'' ~ Sin Er~c.t d -Yes No ~ Fee ~'/9 Lj C3 Date 4 1 e ~' ~ Zoning g •~.~~ - - ~~ . Address of Sign( ~'~ ~!. ~~ ',:;..2 ~ ~Prop~~etor Name~,c^Ml~1un;;Ty ~iz~~:~.~ DBA.. Sign Erector~.c`~tc~ti StC~,~s ~N(_, ~ _AddressG 3~S e;c'~LCC'rr+e- r~Y~°~ ,1/c" i~~'~fi..S %Yl~tl .5~ ~1~~; Tvve of Sign Desi~en _ Weather Cover Lighting A Wall Single Face Clear Lexon Constant hi -Fl Projecting. Double Face Frosted Lexon ~ ng as olvi g R Ground Multi-Faced Plastic Covered ev n i r Roof Aerial/Blimp Shaded ng avel T Li Pedestal. Searchlight Neon te Zip ) i l h Changeable Banner/Pennants Other--.-- n a er.(Exp Ot Temporary Portable Frame: Sign Colors (~,.r-,rE t=,~c~~sr Trailer T ~ A ~ -'Post ~ ~20.~ =e /> ~ ~ ~ • Zti=S -- I~ 'lluminated -Yes.. No Watts !S ~ U _ `- Address s ~ S' (s>~ ~.co ,tiic ~uc/1~hone ~ 3 ~~ -c^G~~C> E~__trical Contractor c'~2ey ~r~= ~--~'~ ~^ iroperty Owner or his Agent Signature Phone Estimated Cost ~ ~ '7 C> o . v c i Sign Width~_Height j (., " Total Square Feet ~ '7 Position of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utility lines, vehicle movement lines, or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions and attached hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page 2. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction plans: including specifications, list of materials, and explicit anchoring or fastening details and a copy of the stress sheets, calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution, or activity conducted on the premises? ~ ~~ ~ Will the sign,, structure, or billboard restrict any for safe access by persons destined for or passing 1 ~~ ~ "~ ~ ~ Applicant's Signatu 'and Title with Firm Phone Number ~ 3 S ' G ~``j0 sight distance under, around, or over' the subject premises? ~~~ Date 4 / ~~ ~ ~' ~ ~- la._ g/83 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN LOCATION SKETCH Sivert Hendrickson/Building Off icial - 86b-5061 __ . ~!1 ~ ~/ t. ; ~ (7 ', ~~ / '~I ~, J ~/~ Z ~ ' ~:.:-, ' ' i ~ . ~ •~ mm .... ~ Q ° =1 ~~ Z ~' ~ 6 N ' _ ~ ~ ~ f I ~ .... ~ ,_., ~,- m . :.:.. ~, ~ ~ ~ ~: N .. .._ ~~ T ~~ a .. J .1 t.~ ~ T. ~. f .. y± ~ i • .yti ~ Al .E •' '+'_ a. i'~ . 1-," ~ r :. ,~,t ,te ^,.; } r'r :' .- I ~ '~ ~ ~ 'f ~ t. , ~~'~ ~ ~ `. 'fit .t ~ ~~ '~ i f rn ~ :~ ~_+ . i G ;.{ ~ {'~ , > , ~ ~ N -i ~ '~ a r c 3 r ' • , ~~y ~ s ~ 76 ~ f fr ~ t . Z r ' X' C7 r ~ 't, ~ ~ .;` ~ ~ Q 2 n ~ a 3 b om- ~ . n p ~ ~ . , ~ T Z 0 N ~--^ °, :~ r //' .. ` `1 '~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ '/ 4 r ,* ~ /--~ ~. , fir--- ~ ~l .- ~. ~, , , c ,~ ,:,_ . ,'. _. --. ., ~ { / ~ ~ i ~~ ~~ r'it i. ~~- ~ ~ . i ~ 1 !, T ~ I ,~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~.._ '. ~- ~` .,..~ ' / r`. ~~ ~~ 2 1~----ap -,~ r r ~o ~F % R' Nor .o txcEeO s " ~` .-. . -----... ~'~ aF 3 • aei CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 169 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Award of Contract - Sand Blasting and Painting of Logan Avenue Elevated Water Tower Council Members: On Thursday, May 2, 1985, bids were received for the second time in accordance with legal requirements, far sand blasting and painting of the Logan Avenue water tower. A copy of the bid minutes and tabulation is attached for council reveiw. The first round of bids were opened on March 7, 1985• The four bidders submitted bids ranging from a low of $114,250 to a high of $148,500. These bids were rejected because the price was too high. The bid specifications were revised. One revision changed the requirement from sandblasting the entire water tank surface to just areas identified in need of sandblasting. The other change was to specify the paint to be used. These charges to the specifications resulted in lower bids that are in line with our estimates ar.d budget allocations. Five bids were received on the second call for bids. The lowest responsible bid meeting specifications is ir. the amount of $77,600. It is recommended the city council award a contract in this amount to Maguire Iron for work on the Logan water tower. R ectfu~l ubmitted, ~. F'~tiL/ , ~ ~ GG or r. G. Ca wri h City Manager JGG/eja a F- ~- CITY OF RICHFIELD Bid Opening May 2, 1985 Sandblasting and Painting of Logan Avenue Elevated Tank BID No. 85-7 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open, and read aloud, sealed bids for Sand Blasting and Painting of Logan Avenue Elevated Tank, as advertised in the official newspaper on April 17, 1985. Present: Eileen Anderson, Representative of the City Manager Don Fondrick, Community Services Director Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk The following bids were submitted and read aloud: BIDDER BID SECURITY TOTAL BID Valley Contracting, 5% 107,000 Stillwater, MN Dairyland Improvement Co., Inc. Cert. Check 103,000 Cottage Grove, WS $5,500 Odland Protective Coating, Inc. 5% 93,875 Minneapolis, MN Maguire Iron, 5% 77,600 Sioux Falls, SD Larson Tank Co., 5% 93,861 Badger, MN The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the May 13, 1985 City Council meeting. Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ ~/ Office of Gity Manager Council Letter No. 168 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Agreement with the City of Minneapolis far Participation in Urban Corps Intern Program Council Members: For a number of years, the City of Richfield has cooperated with the Urban Corps to place area college students in internship positions with the City. This arrangement has been quite beneficial because it has enabled the City to hire additional part-time employees, at very little cost, to either undertake short-term studies or projects, or to supplement our full-time work force in performing some of the City's on-going services. Under the program, undergraduates are paid $x.75 per hour and graduate students are paid $5.75 per hour. However, the cost to Richfield is $1.90 per hour and $2.30 per hour. In 198, Richfield spent approximately $1,200 for five interns who worked at the Nature Center during the summer. The Urban Corps Program is administered by the City of Minneapolis. In order for Richfield to continue participating in this program, it is necessary to execute an agreement with the City of Minneapolis, a copy of which is attached. This agreement does not commit the City of Richfield to hire Urban Corps Interns, but it does provide the City with the option to hire interns through the Urban Corps Program if we c'r.oose. It is recommended that the city council authorize execution of the attached agreement with the Gity of Minneapolis. Respectfu y bmitted, ~u~ ~ ohr. G. Car wrig t City Manager JGC:sb cc: Personnel Manager a .~ - z. 1985 - 1986 AGREEbiIIVT FOR PARTICIPATION IN URBAN CORPS PROGRAM BETWEEN CITY OF 1dINNEAFOLIS AND THIS AGREE~4tENT is entered into this day of 19 , by and between the City of Minneapolis (herein called "Urban Corps") and (herein called "Agency"). WHEREAS, the above named Agency, a public organization or private non-profit tax-exempt organization, desires to participate in the Twin City Area Urban Corps and in consideration for the assignment of Urban Corps student interns to the Agency, we do hereby agree to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Urban Corps shall have the right to approve or reject requests for student interns submitted by this Agency upon forms provided for that purpose by the Urban Corps. 2. The Agency will accept a student as an intern by completing and signing the Assignment section of the student's Urban Corps application form. 3. The Agency shall utilize such students as may be assigned to it in accordance with the specifications set forth in its written request to the Urban Corps, and shall immediately notify the Urban Corps of any change in nature of assignment, duties, supervisor or work location. 4. The Agency shall provide such students as may be assigned to it with a safe place to work and with responsible supervision. 5. The Urban Corps shall have the right to inspect the work being performed by such students as may be assigned to the Agency, and shall have the right to • interview such students and their supervisors. 6. The Urban Corps shall have the right to require such students as may be assigned to the Agency to attend such general or special meetings, or to appear at the Urban Corps office, individually or as a group, as shall be necessary for the proper functions of the program. 7. In accordance with the requirements of Federal and State law, work performed by such students as may be assigned to the Agency shall: a. Be in the public interest; b. Not result in the displacement of employed workers or impair aYisting contracts for services; c. Not involve the construction, operation or maintenance of so much of any facility as is used, or is to be used, for sectarian instruction or as a place of religious worship; and d. Not involve any partisan or nonpartisan political activity associated with a candidate, or contending faction or group, in an election for public or party office. a ~-3 8. The Agency shall require such students as may be assigned to it to submit time reports and follow such other procedures as may be established by the Urban Corps. 9. The Urban Corps shall have the right to remove any student assigned to the Agency from said assignment and from the Agency at any time for any reason without prior notice, and the Urban Corps shall not be obligated to replace said student. 10. The Agency shall have the right to remove any student assigned to said Agency at any time with prior notice given to the student and the Urban Corps. 11. The Agency warrants that it is in compliance with the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 252), and Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59 and Minneapolis Code of Ordinance, Chapter 139 and 141, where applicable. 12. The Agency shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless the Urban Corps from :?tl claiir:~, causes or actions which may result from the assignments of .~-`:t.~~nts to the Agency. 13. The Agency shall obtain at its own expense Worker's Compensation insurance (or shall be self-insured under State Law) for such students as may be assigned to it under this Agreement. 14. The Agency shall pay to the Urban Corps 40~ or other percentage figure as agreed upon by identifying the percentage figure on the student's Urban Corps application form of the gross compensation earned by such students assigned and accepted by the Agency under a Federal or State program. The Urban Corps will bill the Agency, in accordance with bi-weekly payroll periods, for its proper share of the compensation of such students as may have been assigned to the Agency and performed work during said period. Student hourly rates are set forth in Section 14(a) and 14(b) of this Agreement. a. Hourly compensation for students will be set at minimum rates of X4.75 per hour for entering freshmen through receipt of a Bachelor's degree, and $5.75 per hour for graduate students; other agreed upon hourly compensation rates not to be below the specified rates in 14(a); or other rates for Urban Corps student interns as established by the City of Minneapolis, through a salary ordinance replacing current minimum rates. b. A graduate student is defined for purposes of this Agreement as one who has received a B.A., B.S., or equivalent degree or is enrolled in the fifth year of a five year program. 15. At the election of the Agency, the Urban Corps shall place students to intern under a Stipend program. This option will be specified in the Assignment Form which the intern's Agency supervisor must sign before commencement of the internship. The Stipend rate which the Agency shall pay the Urban Corps is $30.00 per week for each week the student works. a.~- y 16. At the election of the Agency, the Urban Corps shall place interns for whom the Agency will pay the intern`s total compensation plus an additional ten percent (10%) for administrative costs. This option will be specified in the Assignment Form which the intern's Agency supervisor must sign before commencement of the internship. Agency rates for said option are set forth in Section 16(a) and 16(b) of this Agreement. a. -Agency rates for students will be set at minimum rates of $5.23 per hour for entering freshmen through receipt of a Bachelor's Degree, and $6.33 per hour for graduate students; other agreed upon hourly compensation rates not to be below specified rates in 16(a); or other rates for Urban Corps student interns as established by the City of Minneapolis through a salary ordinance replacing current minimum rates. b. A graduate student is defined for purposes of this Agreement as one who has received a B.A., B.S., or equivalent degree or is .enrolled in the fifth year of a five year program. 17. Performance under this contract shall commence on July 1, 1985 and terminate on June 30, 1986 unless amended in writing as mutually agreed upon by both the Agency and the Institution; however, either party may terminate upon sixty (60) days written notice. Based upon the statements and affirmations made by the Agency through the above document, the Urban Corps hereby agrees to the assignment of students to said Agency, in accordance with said document and the applicable laws and regulations. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS By Mayor AGENCY Name ATTEST City Clerk Address COUNTERSIGNID City Finance Officer Approved as to Legality: City State Zip Code By Title By Title Attest: Assistant City of Minneapolis Attorney CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ ~i Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 167 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Purchase in Excess of $5,000 Council Members: The city council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, the authority to purchase sr all be submitted to the city council for considera- tion. There are two such items on the May 13 agenda. Transportation Vehicle Some time ago application was made for a grant to provide a transportation vehicle with seating capacity for 24 adult passengers and 3 wheelchairs, with wheelchairs to be positioned in the coach as appropriate. The grant application was made with the cooperation of the Richfield Lions Club. As part of the application, the city agreed to be responsible for 20~ of the vehicle purchase price. The vehicle, to be used with the Richfield Community Center programs, would become part of the city central garage motor pool operation. The Central Garage ar.d Equipment Fund has $6,300 budgeted for purchase of the vehicle. The State Department of Transportation opened bids on August 22, 198. The city has recently been informed, after much delay, that the vehicle will be available this Spring. It is recommended the city council authorize payment of $5,604.0, as the local portion of the $28,022 purchase price, for a transportion vehicle under what is commonly referred to as a 16 (b) 2 grant. Motor Controller The adopted 1985 budget allocated $13,000 for a motor controller at the water plant. A motor controller is an -2- ae_~ electrical frequency converter that controls the speed, depending upon gallon capacity, at which chemicals are mixed into the water. Three quotations were obtained for this frequency converter: Viking Electric $5,695 Graybar Electric $5,757 Lakeland Engineering $6,740 It is recommended the city council authorize the purchase of one frequency converter (Square D ~~8804-1BCA-4L-H10R16C07 AC) from Viking Electric in the amount of $5,695.00. Res ctfu ubmitted, lft John G. Cartwri t City Manager JGC/eja CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ ~.. Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 166 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Request for Temporary Sigr. at Cost Cutters, 66th and Penn Avenue Council Members: Naegele Company has applied for a permit to erect a temporary double-faced sign, to be erected on a trailer, for the grand opening of Cost Cutters at 66th Street and Penn Avenue. The sign will measure 12' x 25' for a total of 300 square feet. It is proposed that the signs be erected on May 30 and remain in place for eight days, until May 28, 1985. City ordinance provides that temporary signs of this nature can only be approved by the City Council. To date, the city council has limited approval of these larger temporary signs to just non-profit service organizations (DECA, Chamber of Commerce) with one exception. Ir. 1983, this portable sign was placed in the HUB Shopping Center parking lot promoting the HUB Christmas sales. The typical sign, for businesses has been limited to a ~4 foot by 8 foot sign (32 square feet). The Naegele portable trailer sign is 12 feet by 25 feet, or 300 square feet. Last month, Super America Service Stations requested and received city council approval to locate a semi-trailer at each of their four service station sites. The semi-trailers were used as a backdrop for promotional signs as well as to hold the products which were promotional lead items during the sale. The request before the city council from Terry Welcome of Cost Cutters is very similar to the Super America Service Station proposal. The promotion is a r.ew store opening ar.d the sale period runs only eight days (May 20th through May 28th). If the city council approves the temporary sign permit application it should be with the stipulation that the sign location be subject to city staff approval. peetf y ubmitted, ohn G. Ca wrigh City Manager - ~' lua e 1 •lsl'~ ~ APPROVE a DENY ~~~ ~',. (; . 1` ~?I~ k ; Planning Department tr~I Ins ector Date APPROVE ^ DENY ~: ~~~ City Council ,~,~~. _- %% ~'~ Date y~j7'~ Date ~.~~ i~,rr:rt ~~ Route to above for special approval per code General Si,~ns APPLICATION FOR ADVERTISING PER~'~fIT City of Richfield, Minnesota Date -~, ~ `. ~ `''~~ Zoning Sign Erected - Yes j No Fee 1 ~ `-~ '~~` Proprietor Name ~• •~~;~ ,, - /< DBA Address of Sign ~, ,.kZ-~ ,-, / i< 1' -_, Sign Erector t ~- ~ , : ~. P ~ ~ Address ~~ ~. ~ '~~ ~ ~ ~,~". Tv~e of Sion Design Weather Cover Lightir. [da11 Single Face Clear Le~;on Constant Projecting ~ Double Face Frosted Lexon Flas:-:ing Ground Multi-Faced Plastic Covered Revolving Roof Aerial/Blimp I Shaded Traveling Pedestal Searchlight Neon Zip Lite Changeable Banner/Pennants Other ~ Other(Explain) Temporary Portable Frame: ~ Sign Colors Trailer T ~ A ( ~ Post If Illuminated - Yes ~o Watts ectrical Contractor \ Address Phone irogerty Owner or his Ager.t Signature Phone _i Estimated Cost '-' Sign Width ~'~ Height ,~ ~ Total Square Feet '~_.. Position of the advertisement structure in relationship to the adjacent buildings, sidewalks, curbs, roadways, overhead utility lines, vehicle movement lines, or public facilities on drawing with significant dimensions and attached 'Hereto of major signs. Minor signs as defined on page 2. Two blueprints of the sign, billboard, or outdoor advertising structure construction Glans: including specifications, list of materials, and explicit anchoring or fastening details and a copy of the stress sheets, calculations, color of sign structure. Does the sign copy relate solely to the business, institution, or activity conducted on . the premises? Wi11 the sign, structure, or billboard restrict any sight distance under, around, or over for safe access by persons destined for or passing the subject premises? Applicant's Signature and Title with Firm Phone Number ~- ~ Date 1- i !~ - - t d/g3 PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SIGN Sivert Hendrickson/Building Official - 866-5061 LOCATION SKET ~ ~/ ,~ ~ ~ ~`~ ,~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ,~~~ GROL:+D SIG:: ~ ::IDTH~ L~GL`:D W~,LL SIG;I ~~~IIDTn ~ LEGEtiD PEDESTAL SICV ~' i~ IDTI~-~-~ .J ' ~~ LEGEND ~i . k00F SIGN r~_ WIDTH LEGEND ROOF ~S .. r- Q a ~3- 3 PT~OJECTING SIGH: i ~ ''IDTH G ~ II c ~,~~ ~' Place location of si7n on this sketch with distance the sign is from property lines. Locate any traffic lights within 300 feet. DEFINITIOti: *iinor Signs -- Single or double faced sign less than 32 sq. ft. on a com.~~on board I~DICaTE `ORTH LKT/8/83 Indicate Distance From The Building Indicate leGer.d on t:~e the reverse side in the space below ~~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of Gity Manager Council Letter No. 165 Agenda May 13, 1985 The Honorable.Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Richfield Subject: Approval of Plans and Specifications for the 1985 Alley Paving Project - C.P. 812 Council Members: The city council has previously approved the concrete paving of the following six alleys: Alley Between From To Augsburg ar.d Garfield Avenue 70th Street 71st Street Russell and Sheridan Avenue 68th Street 69tr. Street Blaisdell and Nicollet Avenue 75th Street 76tr. Street Upton and Thomas Avenue 68th Street 69tr. Street Xerxes and Washburn Avenue 68th Street 59th Street Queen and Penn Avenue 68tr. Street 69th Street The city engineer has prepared plans and specifications for these alleys in accordance with council action. The plans and specifications for the 1985 alley paving project are essentially the same as in previous years. The standard 11 foot concrete alley cross-section will be installed. Asphalt will be placed between garages or fences and the concrete alley where the garages ar fences are three feet or less from the concrete. If the garages are more than three feet away, sod will be installed. Driveways and other areas will be matched in to the alley with the same material as existed. T'r.e contractor will be given 25 working days to accomplish the work. This should allow sufficient time to complete the work, while at the same time requiring the contractor to follow up each phase of the construction immediately after the previous phase. Attached are samples of information. given to homeowners before and during construction of the alleys. The bid opening will be scheduled for June 14, 1985, with award of contract to be considered by t'r.e council on June 24, 1985. Constructiar. is anticipated to begin. in July. -2- ~f{- L The staff recommends that the city council adopt the attached resolution, approving the plans and specifications and ordering the placement of an advertisement for bids. Re ectful y; flitted, ~~ ohn G. Gar wrig t City Manager JGG/eja aA•3 RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR G.P. 812 - 1985 ALLEY PAVING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions passed by the city council, the city engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of the following alleys by reconstruction and concrete paving: Alley Between From To Augsburg and Garfield Avenue 70th Street 71st Street Russell and Sheridan Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Blaisdell and Nicollet Avenue 75th Street 76th Street Upton and Thomas Avenue 68th Street 69th Street Xerxes and Washburn Avenue• 68th Street 69th Street Queen and Penn Avenue 68th Street 69th Street And has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: ~1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved; 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper and the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published May 22, 1985, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the clerk until 11 a.m. on June 14, 1985, at which time they will be publicly opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the city clerk and city engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7 p.m. on Jur.e 24, 1985, in the council chambers and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the clerk for five percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 13th day of May, 1985• John Hamilton, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Glerk S?,.'~1PLE CF NCTI.^E ~IL~ PRICR TC CCNSTRC;CTICN Dear Resident: We are pleased to inform you that the bids have been received dnd a contract awarded for the concrete paving of your alley. Within the next several weeks, tl`le contractor will be commencing work on your all=y. During construction you will experience some inconveniences. You can expect the operation of heavy equipment and noise, dust or mud and restricted access or no access to your alley for a period of about three weeks. Remember, the concrete cannot be driven on for seven days after it has been poured. pie ask your cooperation in observins3 all warning signs and barricades and by parking on adjacent streets during construction. The contractor will keep dust and inconvenience to a minimum. The contras*_or for This project is "" ~ ~ _ - '~"' ~t Bailey and BiI1 Douglass wi1L be the inspectors for the City ,.and they can be contacted at t~'le job site or the Engineering Division, Sb9-i521. Lf you have any questions or problems related to the project, please contact *,.hese inspectors. The City and contractor will take ~rnal precautionary measures *_o warn people or" ~'te construction area; however, construe*_ion equipment and activities are potentially serious hazards to carious children, and we would appreciate ;aour cooperation-- in ensuring t=hat your -- ,children stay away from construction equipment and s~tes- A notice will be placed on your door t:*~e day before the anticipated actual start of construction on votL" alley. your driveway will 'ce ;watched in to the concrete alley wit.`1 t~^.e same material 3s ex13t.3 Cri VOID Crlveway (conCr°C°, blacktop, or gravel). Blacktop will be placed in the st,i? between }'te a_Ley and side of garages within 3 feet of the diley. _= the distance bet'~een the garage and alley is more than 3 feet, sod will be ?'_aced. _ _,..,, war-an~~ `_om t~`.e contactor. a=1-- The sad is covered by a 30 day - Tom. Jf _dr :iCI"'4O~~1ER. of ease 30 DAYS , T?E SCD .S :".~?.~.' R: SPCNS :3i1~_ . - - - inspector 'CeYore ,-ne '.r3r-anty axpi_es iL tale sod contact t:Ze city - iS '3nsaLCSIdCtOry, SO t,~aC the ConL:3CtOr Can COI'reCt Cale ']roblem. " t:.e con- e City hd5 =eC==yed requests t'om residents ask_ng == Cractor will perform additional concrete worx on private proper*_ies sus'.: as dr;veways. :any such work is outside ~Ze scope of the city project and right of way. Lt is the respons_bility of _he•homeo•.mer t w 1 C:1 ,iL~~r - - _ . _ . O r any LO drran$e d COntr3C such additional worx. Sincerer ~~ Michael J. Eastlin$, ~••-- City Engineer ~CD CD~ -- -. -- ~~co o ~~ p ~ a ~ ~ n O aO ~_ `-a o~~-~'~-~f0~ vc ~ a a S ~ N ~ ~' D 11 ~ N O cD cD ~. < ~ -. ~ C . ,,~ A ~ ~ ~ cZ ~. --~• a N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ N ~~- ~~-~~ o~ -~ a~~~No~= ~ ~ z ~ O ~ D ~ ~- ~ N fl- - ~ O ..- N ~. « ~ ~, z ~ ~~~~o~ao ~z oa ~ . ~ ~ ~ w ~ a~Q~o ?~ °~ ~~ -a tT'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ca ~ °- ~ ~ O •~ V ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q p O~ G ~ ~ \ ~ V } Z A , N 3 G~ C o~aoo~oa`~ Q° a c ~. ~ ~ a o ~- i z . to Z7 ~ -1 O ~ ~ n ~ ~ -{ ~ ~ a ._ c _ h ~ ~ ~~~~-~~ ~ ~ = fl ~ c ~ ~ o o z ~. ~ - _, O a -~ ~.: fl ~ ~ ~ ~- n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~,. a ~ ~ ~ ~ o; ~. _ ~ TJ ~ ~ ~ ? Q. to ~. "" ~ n. x cn ~' ~" ~ ~ t o y 7 a ~ ~ (D rr r'i to ~ y r~ ''C 4 ~ (0 't ~Q r ~ .. ~ ~ !~ ~ ~ ^ :J .J O ~ :~ 7 I . .r G r ~ ~~ ~~, ~~ ~-? ~ E ~ Z E ~ ~ ~ - ~ -, ~ - `G n ~ -, -- ~ G ^ . ~ U7 m a ~ u ;n ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~ C , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ro~* ~~, ~n ~r~a ~-c - rn ~ ~-- E my say w ~ ~ z SS- ~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager Council Letter No. 164 Agenda May 13 1985 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Gour.cil City of Richfield Subject: Community Survey Results Council Members: Results from the November/December, 1984, survey of residents are available. Bob Nelson, Director of Information Systems and Research for the Richfield Public Schools, has tabulated the 667 responses. Nearly 1,000 questionnaires were mailed to a randomly selected sample of Richfield residents. Bob Nelson will distribute at Monday's 5:30 p.m. study session an analysis of the survey and will review the findings and analysis. Provided as backup are the following: 1. The survey questions and the tabulation of responses; 2. City Manager memorandum of May 6, 1985, entitled "Conclusions and Analysis of 11/84 Community Survey; and , 3. Eileen Anderson's memorandum which summarizes responses made by persons to the open ended questions dated May 3~ 1985, entitled "Survey Comments". An invitation to those members of the Advisory Board ar•d Commissions who helped develop questions for the survey has been given to sit in on the Monday, May 13, 1985, 5:30 p.m. study session. It is the City Manager's plan to have the survey results placed on the agendas for each Advisory Board and Commission for their review and use. - 2 - J ~.J Copies of the survey results will be sent to the nearly 1,000 persons who were invited to participate in the survey. Also, a summary will be placed in the Your City/Your Schools newsletter (June issue). R ectful y s emitted ~ '~,'~ "L(f Z'L ohn G. Car ig City Manager JGC/eja ' - ~ ~~ • PLEASE: FEEL. FREE TO S.7RITE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON ANY QUESTION. ~~ . Co (s~~ Make an X along ,the- scale- for each questi.on.. Leave the response blank if you have no- opinion on a. question. The choices.. for questions I - ?are:: SA A II SD . Stron~tly Agrees Disagree 'Strongly - - -Agree Disagree- I.. The City of Richfield should continue: to= guide SA. A D• SD _ ~ redevelopments in: other areas of the. city,. as- b/Ni ll 1$ ~ ,~~.$ ~.~ `Zat ~~ et area- co was done: in; the- Lyndale/.Hu .~._.. 2'- The Richfield` Fublir Safety Department. (Fire,. - Police, and~MedicaT Emergency) employeesr SA A D SII'~ respond vexgg quickly to emergencies... i2(o0~30$~ ~~ ~ ~ ( ~~ . arm- able to- effectzvely solve the- ~ 15~. ~ 358 ~ 22. ~ Z ~ ~~ ~ _ problems they deal with. - :. r` . ~ ~ (t~o~'~351,. ~'Z.C~>~~ !~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~t~~-~ are fair and have good: rapport with: the public.. 3` . L fermi the Ct.tg° of Richfield spends- its- money SA. S' A. SIl _ _ wisely.. _ i ~Z- J 2ta-i ~ ZL3 j ~9. ~ ~ D:~^ -- - _ - - ._ - :. -. , 4~. As:. I approach: reVtirement age-~. L would= cons-ider ~ : S.~ S: A:. SD -. h .,~ selling.. my~ hole ia• Rzchfi eld- and: moving into= - D h i k I S~- ~ elf ~ ~'l-C- f Z1~ ~ ~ ~~ ve. r ore e-s senior- citizen:' hous3:ag (like: the La ' Condominiums.) .: - } _ .. {: 5- Why do you -shoes at they Richfield Municipal Liquor Stores? ~` Z d.o: no c-, ~ ~ • ~ _ ?~- ~°3' SA_ A D SIl More convenient: and. accessible. ~ ~~~ ~~~~ 13 (~ ( 2.yt~ Lower prices,-discauats .available. (S~ ~ 14~. 14~ ! 3(a ~. 2$7. _ i l ~ Ca'Z ~2~Qi' 3'? ~ ~ ~ X3.03. ... ._ on... ect Variety and_ se The profits-are spear on city improvements within Richfield.. - 6 ~ The- Mayor and City Council members in Richfield SA A D SD are• responsive• to city residents_ r (~. ~ C}3 ~' Sq ~Z•L I - ~ ~ 7.. The ward system of representation is. effective. SA A D T• SD Questions $ - 29,. indicate your response by markfng an X $.. 9.. along: the scale.. If Land.were to became available withirx Richfield ~~ through-some redevelapment~,.what should. have High Law: the highest prioritp? .. Priority Priority More smalT~ business° and retail shops.. J ~~3 ~ ~52J l2at J 1~k3 (. ~ da _. Mo:rc high. density housing. J3~ ~"'7rs J Glg J3o~~ [33• More retirement: housing:.. ~ 112. J l(o~ JtjCo J t~0~ `{3 . Moren panics: aad• apes 1and..~ ~i2w l t'LS ~ t3 t J l1a~J 1Z1' More singZer fam~.iy housing«. J2~ ~ ~ t"t ~ J °- t ~ «1'~• ~ °i 1. Ho~s~ much' effort' should the City' of Richfield put - into each of these methods: it order- to attract Much. No -~ young families' with.-children. to Ki:chfield? Effa=t Effort . Advertise,. ar• 'distribute' pamphlets. ~ _. ~4. ~- ~ l3 a J lco~ J tt.loJ f.i~ ', _ ~ Maintain air excellent schoo.L spstem~. J ~~c3 j -"13 J l~ J ~- ~ ~ :"-Have- panic°and ~recreatioa programs... J323: JZA3~~- SSS J 1~.. J. ~-Q , 'Have:- chiSd~: day- care available-,. JZ`~°J ~&i J l.o'1:.i: Sg ( - . _. Other,. describer ~~ - C _ IO ~: As Richfield makes- ,use" of state and'federal - - _ _ subsidies,. which:. groups, of people do you feel. Should Should. -. should. be- helped: bg the. City of Richfield's - be not be:. " housing policies?`- ~ helped.. helped.. .~ 40~ l~3 35 t.~ -S_~. TheF elderly and: the;'. handzcapped« J J J J J People witi~ Iawe or~'moderate ineames. J tg~ J~3 J 1'3~: J ~'~'~ J ~~. Foung~ families: with, children. -' =~ . ~4~ ~ t~1~ J L i''I._ (ur$ J ~' 2 II.. Which- commercial areas.-ia the city' da you fees are- in need of redevelopment? (.Check the areas on Che map _.) -- . a- J ~r b J J~ c" J ~~• d J ~,. e~ ~~. f J J -. 1 - ~ ~ ~ ~. 12. How- would.. you rate the 'quality of. Life' • in Richfield as: compared t.o other. Twin City southwest. area.. suburbs?' Better. Same uor.se SS (3-t~ ~ 259 I l t C 22 13«. Which. areas- need more- or' Iess• enforcement? ~ _ More Same Less d I :: ` (1~~ (38~ (3:~ ( ~2Ca: - an and use Zaning .- AaimaT coatroS.. _ (23°t (32co ( 1q ~ ~ k~- Outside. property maintenance,. such a$ (3-S (2"'to ~ t3 (~ ~°`~ ... grass,.. weeds,,. ,~unk:.cars ` :.~ - Hflusiag- codes,. perma.ts. for. construction (g3~ ~~~~ (~~` ( ~~~ or' remodeling.. _ I4.. I think the° foSTos~f.ng changes should: be made Zncrease~ Decrease` _ is the ZeveZ. of. service; in: these areas ~ services services: . _ ~ ._ :. every if` Leave- and: hold:. • - - a higher. .. then. taxes _ °' `'~ _ _ tax cost. same - dower ' g• ~°_ ~O ~'4' ~`'~ ~,~- - Ma3nteaaace of parks _ ~ ( 1. ( " _ streets: - Maintenance o£ ~ - - ~ 1, t~- t 5 '- • S o 3 . ~_~ :_ snowplc~ng.. ~ ~ ' . . . ~ a 0 ~k~1o- ~~ ~Z_ ... _ __ - -- - Cleaaup~. Sgrs.n~ ( ( ~< .~ _ s ~- ~ ~ `jr ~~ ~~ ~`` F.icensiag: services at Citg HaII« (~ ( ~ ~ .. ....: >. l ld ~ ( 1 ~" ~ ( 3 + ~~ 3' ~ (• ~~ er y.. the- e Home heal rb~ programs- fo r _ ~ C O tc ~ t 4 t 7. ~.~. the elderly Recreatioir programs- for. ( ( ( ( 5 ~ 4+ ~ 1 O ~ ~ Q Programs fog adul. ts.. ( ( ~ ( ' Programs for teenagers- and young children. ( ~'~ ~ ( 3 ~ a ( 3 $ ~ & a. - - 11'Z,,, 3G $: ( g ~ ( ~~}... Child day care ( ~ ~ ~lS 3.3 ~ (a o t. e:. t. ~ Dag care for. the elderly ~ ( ( , For questions:. 15. and:.I6,.'you.may want to Took back at your responses: to I4~ 15.: What programs: do you think ere t+i.ssing in Richfield.? ,~ r1. $ ~ _ 3z~ I6. What do• you think should be discontinued. in Richfield? 2aq _ .. _ «r.5$ -. .. - 17.. I think the overall. appearance Very Average. Not ' o.f the:City of Richfield. is: Attractive. Attractive .. _.. - l.~g. ,252 23 Co ~S Ca - (~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ . I8~ Hover oftea_.do you or members of ~~'~ ~: Almost every.day« pour family ride• an MTG burr` ° • . ~ .:. - out C~ -. f Dace a. week.: _ : ~= t~~~ ~ Qnce o ~ ` - r - a man r twice• th.. - _ - : _ 19`«. If yotx ride: any MTC~ bus,. how well. does: the bus Excel- Don.'~t: . system- meet:. your needs to: lent- Good. Fair Use - . -. - - : r -_ :.. k ~ ~ ~-3.~~ ~ 4La: ~3 cam. ~ ~G~~l ~. 3.-~ 5- er _~: ga toy wor ~. _ c ~ ~ ~~ f 1g ~ 3~ 1 ~ ~? j ` ~ '3 ~-'~. g . shopping.. ies ili l f di ~ S J: ~ 4 8 ~ l'1vr I ~ ~~ ~ ~Qt; ...: _ ,. t ac ca get toy recrea tioa,. me - _ _~ $, or tc~ visit" peeple.. . = ' . • 2U~. Dc pe~z or members of you~• family kaow'` enough. ' 431. ~I'lS N y` j ~ ~ ~ Y .~. O bus sers~iceN tn• rsde: it2 - - about' existing: MTC a ~ es _ _ 2T.. Doi you now-,. ar wouldw yo~t reeycle~ aay of ~ the. - - - following-wash- materiaSs.?` Yes Maybe: No. - y ~~ ~~ 53 o 2~ - Newspapers. - - fi ~ 1 . (~'tlo I t2Co, {a2 ~ 5~. metals. ATuminumr or other: ~ ~ -_ - . cras 3 ~ t ra ~~ t~t,.'t..1 ~ ~: "'t ,~. . s +3.3.~ ~ ~C~.1 l~S~ ;1{ra.:, Oil,, and/or batteries: 2.. _. .. ,. . ;^ . - • . ,. . What do ..you Tike: best about. Richfield? . ,.~. _ - 2~ What chan~tes would you..Iike~ to seer in Richfield in. the next. ten years? - X30 _ ~~ - 24. Z have lived. in. Richfield less than 5 .years.. ~ ~ ~ ,. 5 to 20 yearn 1~-~~-1 , over 20 years. }33 ~'~' ~ . Z2 " ~ :.:. ~~ from ~ to~ 39 ~ I32 ~ ~ from: 44 25~.- Mp age isx under' 30. ~ ~ , to 44 ~ ~ oil '' .. =~ from 50. to= 5g' =13'3. ~.,. from 60' to 64' 1~~ 1 , 70 or- aver. 1 ~~`1 r ~-`~ _ .. 25.. Please: checir ATE. theses which. describe your household stn tus.~ "~ -. . , I: have: children:. under. Ip` 'years old., (lVr l ~ - S2~ ... _..:. ,. _ Z have children. f=ans:~ I~ to-" 20 years oId~. ~ l'flo ~ .~_ -UcgS- / M9` children. aze~ now adults,. and. have- moved. away.... 12`~~ 1. __..~ 3."'1Z v ld • 1 C o 31 S ~`'~' . ren. e- as:y chi I do na t ha ~ 2T.. 2 am... ~ . a single" female ' ~ ~. ~ t -. ~ ,. _ .a single male- j S 3 ~ r - " - a. married: female (1~ ~ t ~: a: married:- male. ~ 3 051- . - - .~ ~ .... .. _ -. - - _. -. '~~ k.-. ~.. - _ ..: ..~~: _ ~ 28`~ T" Zz.ve in_ arx apartment 1~~_ ri a single. family home or- - W1 V duplex j 1 ~. Vim:. r: 29'r L Iive~ 12t~=east: of Portland. Avenue. _ _ . _,~~ aa~ thee-..area:. from:. Portland: to- Zaterstate• ~W. _ - - ~ 21`~~ ,.west of~ Saterstate 35W~ - ~ ~. . ^~ _ - _ - - ~_ • • • t • CITY OF RICHFI=LD, Mzi1VLS0i~ Intar-Office Memara~dum D4Tc: stay 8, ' 19$5 'T0: Bob Nelson: - Richfield Public Sc'r.ools Steve Devich - Director :~dmir~istrative Services Bill Fillmar~ - Director Liquor Operations Don Fondrek - Director Community Services. Dennis ;{raft - Director Community Dever pment Ti~amas Morgan - Director t~ublic S ~ .: FROM: ; JGhr. G. Cartwright - City Ma:^.a~er~ // cf/ SU3JrCT: Conclusions and. !analysis of 11/84 Com;nun.ity Sur•~ey 1. City efforts to guide redevelopment, sorb as the L/H/V/, has a very :^.igr approval rate from Richfield reside^ts (?~ to 89~' by a1T age-groups). ?. Richfield Rublic Safety Departmect is judged to be a very respons.'ve and effective service delivery department. 3. Residents by a slight majority, 323 to 242, believe Richfield spends its money wisely. This fi^.dir.g could mea;^ that the City should do :more., to explain tG its residents t^~ r$aSOnS for orogr3ms and the rt.eeds tha% are, or are ^ot, bel::~, met. -'~ SUr~rlsiTg~y, fewer perSOn~ tha;i eXpeC%ed i,'. t:^.@ 8~? ;~^OU',J of JO" y°ar"s Of age or older are S°e<i:iQ ar a~ t°r;'~tiVe ".OUS? ng °OUrCe to the COnLinued Use Of ~he~r Si::a31° f amply J .7 inn ~n n ~crir? ~n roc -~~c~ ;;^ome Orly 1-~;, said t _..y a, co si ..~ a .a ._ as ~,._y approach Gr ha'Je e'^.tered t:'_e retirement 3~e Cat2~Gry. i'r1e ;lounger age groups tG a Greater BXtent -- 25c tG ~~~ -- Say whey 'NoUld CGn..ider al~er;:at_Ve hOUS~;:g '•~QGn a_~,^rrGaChi::7 r._` °:.Iremen V . 5. T^e most important reasons fGr ShooDl.::g at the RiC',^_f].~Ld municipal l7.QuOr StOreS• are: :~. rGnVe'.':1enCe ana aCCesS_.~--_.y B. ?rofits are spe*:t on C3pi~a1 i:^pro'le:~e is within Richfield ~. The city CGunCii received a Very ^'?~'! rating frGm reSld2n~S for being responsive: Under age 40 - ~8a . age 4D to 50 - 75 Over age 60 - ??q -2- 55- 1 • Twa-girds of the persor:s raspording to tie questi~ said. the ward system. of represer:tatiar: is respo :live. 3. ;J^en asked what type of development is favored if land were available, the choice variedsignficartly by .age. group. T^e under age 4~ respo~der.ts favored more single family housing and parks/oiler: space. Two-t'r.irds of the u0 to 00 age group favored .yore single family dousing, but n-ot more parks or ape;: space. T?is opinion was shared by the age group 60 and over. Perhaps the most surprising answer was t:^_3t all age- . groups were of tde same opinion. that ;Mare nigh density dousing should. not be c~ichfleld~s c!ig:^_est priority! 9. Pespondents were ur:animous that city ar:d scnaol officials carp best attract younger families with cdiidren to RiCnfield by maintair~ing an eXCellent school system, en- couraging child. care services, and ca;^.centrate on park and..recreation programs. 10. If Ricdfield city government applies for state or federal subsidies. for dousing, there is support by the community to aid each of these: lderly and handicapped - ~5; Lew ar moderate i~.^.come oerso;:~ - ~0 Young families wild children - ~? i'; `,y'(?at COm«erClal ar?35 it the City are 1;; ~`,Pe ~re3teS~ need of development? T:'.e tnr°e ^igP prlOritV 3re3s are. Pe~:: at 'Nest "-~ met 50 :,~_ Stn,. ; Lyndale,7~tC! Street, ~j~,~~~u area (ILV) ; and , fast OOtn Street at Cedar jj persons COmm?nted fUrtder a:: :his gUestian. .''!GSt Caftl:fle^Ls IJC'aSed G:: tr aI I iC COn$eStlar pra3le^1S 12. i4ore tdan I?alf, 5:J'i, of the re=pOnde::ts believe the +~Q'uallty of life'+r 1': RlC;?leld l.~ b°~Ler tn3.r Ot^er southwest suburbs. ust i said is was worse. 13. Outside property mai.:tenar:ce, sued as grass, weeds _::,:; funk Cars 15 the area In greatest need aI',dare Ci~y enfarCemec:t nimal CantrGl was raTked S8C0':d . Zanl.ng, 13r:d USe 3^d bUl.ldl..^:g COdeS are a:ieQuat2ly e:^forced r~spande^ts say. 9 • • -3- 11. Respondents overwhelmingly say teat pity services should cor:tir:ue at the same level of service as is currently provided. 55-/D Respondents, aoout one-third, fel some services should be fir:creased eve:: if a 'nigher tax cost is necessary. the services are: A. Home: health pr•ogr•ams for the elderly; B. Programs for• tee::a~ers a:d yaur.g children; C. Child day care; ard, ~. Day care for theelderly. ?j. Respondents weC'e as'.-Ced what progra,^~s do you think are missing in Richfield. 289 per-sons gave. their ooinions. The only item to receive more than- 10~ support was a;:_ expressed need for more child day care facilities (12 1/2~) . T~^e most likely co~:clusion to draw i s teat t'.^.is co:nmu;:ity i5 Ver'y Sat1S le~ witi^_ t^e pufJ1iC Servlc~5 ard. pr0ora?I1S now available. 15 . When asked what do~ you think should be d iscor~ti.^.ued , responder.tscould .not agree on arty particular program or service. 1; Ric'effield was rated average tQ Very attractive by 9?n of ,the 5~7 persons who rasponded to this question. ?:'{, :.es` t:^. a:: ~`~q of ti^.e ~~7.CC?I7.81d DODU13tio?: r"'.des t^@ ~~?'r, bUs On a' weekly Oasis. i''do-th~r ds Of 311 respondents -:ever use the ~iTC bus . The Over o0 age group reports t.^.at ? oUt of 4 rides a OUS Once or t'diCe 3 mOnt^. ?^y. ~ ::13jQrity of MiC riders rate t^e ;~_'~ bU- ser'I~ce eit^er good. or excellent. ?0. 7? ~ o=` 50.8 responses said they are ~CnOwl°d-eable °roUg~' abAUt eXiS~ing MTC bUS serVlCe i,o ena0ie them :O use ~P.e se~-vi~=e . ? Close ~O 3va O. Lhe respondents sai~ t`.^.ey ~Q, or ~Nill, . recycle newspapers. The aCtUal par~icipatiOn in ~. id = vo ur: ~ ary , urb co. ^~ Rich' i e' ' ~ 1 t side ' lection -`rog'"a„ averages 1~~ participation. Cre :nay conclude t'C'.3t t:1e recycling program s^oUld grow dramatically with time. The other noteworthy conclusion from the recyclir:g question. is the '^igh level (~O~ or more) of s.uppart to recycle other items such as alumir:um, glass, oil and ta~teries _~_ ss - i/ 22. 5~4 persons (some listed more trap ore item) told what trey li'~e best about Richfield. The top vote getters were: ~. Conver:iert location (175); Sense of a small, friendly, and family B.oriented town (133) C. School syste:-~ (i 20) ; ar.d , D. Veat and clear., property a:rd streets well maintained (57). 23. 430 respondents said they would like to see some c,^.arges i^ Richfield over the next ten years, but there was little agreement on what the C;^a;:geS Sr!OUI~'. dc1. Tre ~n ~g'neSt vote gett°.rs Wer.°.: A. More young families.(37); B. Lower property taxes (31); ard,~ C. Maintain and upgrade tre present rousi::g stock to prevent .slum areas (24). 2u. Richfield has about 15,000 dwelling units including. apart,;ients. Approximately 400 comes are put up for sale.- each. year . Respondents were asked row long t:^_ey rave lived.. ir: Richfield. T'ne conclusion is that just. slightly more than 50~ of our population 'r_as resided. i^ Richfield for over 20 years! Rercent of Rerso~:s U.^. sr Aga. 40 Cver Respondi:^g Age 40 to 50 Age 50 Less trap ~ years 40 ~ ~ 5 to 2'? years 45 38 15 Cver 20 years 15 7 J ; a3 ., ~t0i_. a :.^.ave rio'.r ~naae a.-:y commen~s on ~^_e demograpr~_c goes t for s 25 , 27 , 28 a::^.d 29 . ~'.r~/e ja • CITY OF RICHrIELD, MIN~~=SOYA Inter-Office i~(emora~:dum i 55-/~- DAT=. May 3, X985 TO: Jo'r.r. G. Car ht City Manager cROM: Sileect Arde -Administrative Assistant SUBJ.CT: Survey Comm ~ is question 9. How much effort should the City of Richfield out i:"t0 e3Ch o f these (lethodS i r order to allraC t your:? f amll leS wI~C? Childr?n' to RiChf laid? .?dvertise or dzstrioute pamp'r.lets Maintair. ar, zxeellzr~t school system Park and. Recreation Programs C'nild Day Care Available ?? persons had comma:;ts as follows: Provide. Iow interest, subsidized mortga;es 10 rower property taxes and keep them doer;: 20 Advertise low crime, home safety 5 Provide more- day care facilities -~ ~UeStiOr: 11 ~dhiC(! cometercial areas 1 t:?e City do you I?el are is reed of redevelopment? 55 persons Comule:^.ted O:: `.}'_iS ~'I,lleStiQ^.. `°toSt aJ.l CO(1iH°.^.tS ',sere varied, wil'c n0 Ce;^:tr31 t:^.eme, bul t',^.e !Tla„Or7.Ly focUSeC OYi :riffiC CQngeStion and tr3ffi.C C^::trOl problems. T:^e .~ajor~ty 0. ComC2eYitS w2re reGUeSt~ .`or weft tUrr lan°S a~ jOt^ and Pe^r s CGrreCllon 0I tr3ff is DroblemS at ?7i,~^_ 3rd ?°_'"; ~:id '7~:'_ a:":d ~d_co~let, no more {-i~!3rls de`IeQp the RObert ;?3l. SiC~ and ~ -~ re~UeSIS fOr a grocery Store 1.. _a5~ RiChfiel... ~duestior: 15. '+~r3t programs do you lhir.':~c are :~~ss~ S ~r 2 9 r pon.. ., :~o ~ o ~Jhic~. we. .._.~ .. ~. ..o..mor ~^emes were a. ~"'ollows . `feed a recrea tion center for leer:: ~ 'deed.. programs other than at':~ielic prog rams for teens and young ^'h:ldrer: ; 2 Teed more chi ld day care facilities 35 ?iced elderly day care '.~ 'feed elderly recreation: programs , 'deed elderly home help ( clear:ing, s^o~~el- `' o ~.: r ~' ~uestirr: 15. 'Tat ~.o you tbi;:k should be di scortti~:ued ir. Riehfi~ld? 209 ar:swers bad almost as many suggestioTS! Most common were: Note irg No more high rises for seniors aliminate high cor~centration oT programs for seniors DiscoTtinue low i:come 'r.ousir.g Discor:ti::ue city waste- (TO specific. suggestions) eliminate Airport. Noise alimir.ate spring clean up eliminate subsidized develapmeTt eliminate buying property for parks elimi~:ate iawr/political signs 4 13 15 5 a 5 4 7 5 !~ QuestioT 22. '~Ibat do you like best about Richfield? 574 responses (some listed. more than or:e) were as follows: Convenient 1OC3t1on 175 Sense of community, small town: atmosphere, frie::dly people, family oriented 133 School System 120 N23t a::d clean, property and streets well.•aaiTtaiTed 07 Quiet, reside:^tia? area 35 J2fe, low crime 2~ ~,1ood parks andrecreatioT 25 ^1[;e:tinT 23 TnI:?at cbar.a°_S would you ..1~{? t0 See T ~1C^f1°~'~.. tc~ Text :~:: years 130 comme::ts were received . The most com:,iar. of these 'der? ; .,Td ~^.1$:'_ deTS 1`. y :?OUS ing 7 `_,ower property taxes' 31 '~(aiTtaiT and upgrade. preseTt housi^? .~ stock to prevent slum areas 2~ More young families ?7 Grocery store i^. cast Richfield ~5 i"r.eatre iT Richfield 10 Improve ?err: AveTe 6~/75th Street 10 Mere developmeTt _,. city to lower taxes: 15 upgrade pr=serf com,mer.^.ial areas 19 Improve both and Cedar 9venu~ 5 • •