04-11-88 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 101
Agenda April 11, 1988
40 Issue Statement:
Authorization for City Manager to execute stipulation for
dismissal of the City of Richfield from the Pertinen Planning &
Design vs. Copy Duplicating case.
Background:
The City of Richfield was brought into litigation between Donald
F. Pertinen Planning & Design vs. Lincoln Companies.
The suit involves a claim by the planning company against Lincoln
Companies for nonpayment of services rendered by the planning
company. Lincoln Companies did not pay for planning and design
work related to the CDP building.
According to the Lincoln Companies, payment was not made because
Lincoln alleges the work was not done to their satisfaction.
The City of Richfield was involved in the litigation as fee owner
of the property, but no money damages were sought against the
City.
The City required Lincoln Companies to post a bond to protect the
interest of the City in this matter. Since the bond has been
posted, the plaintiffs, Donald F. Pertinen Planning & Design,
agree that the City of Richfield no longer needs to be defended
. in the case.
In the letter accompanying the stipulation, the attorneys' for
plaintiff have stated that they reserve the right to bring the
City back into the case if it is determined that the City
wrongfully rejected the building plans, slandered or in some
other way wronged the plaintiff.
Recommended Motion:
Authorize the City Manager to execute the stipulation.
if Basis for Recommendation:
1. There is no advantage in continuing to be represented in
this matter.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This matter will be presented for consideration at the Council
meeting of April 11, 1988.
If there is a need to discuss additional information regarding
this issue, the Council should adjourn to Executive Session for
the purposes of discussing threatened litigation.
submitted,
Respe&.rosser
•
James City Manager
JDP/eja
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 100
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Council Receipt of the Unaudited 1987 Financial Report.
Background:
The annual financial report for the period ending December 31,
1987, has been completed by the Administrative Services
Department. The audited financial report is not available at
this time, due to the audit provision which requires Richfield's
financial reports to be audited by Deloitte, Haskins & Sells
subsequent to April 15. As council members may be aware, the
City received a reduced audit fee in turn for approval for the
auditors to delay their audit work until after April 15.
The Richfield City Charter requires the financial report to be
submitted to the City Council for fiscal year-end information by
April 10 of each year. This report is submitted to Council-
members prior to April 10 for review. The report has also been
scheduled for official receipt at the April 11, 1988 City Council
meeting.
The attached Summary Report reflects the performance of the
General Fund, Utility Funds, Golf Course Fund and Liquor Fund.
Recommended Motion:
Receive the unaudited 1987 Financial Report of the City.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. City Charter provides that the financial report of the City
be submitted to the City Council by April 10 of each year.
2. Audited financial reports for 1987 will not be available for
several weeks.
3. The Administrative Services Department has just completed
their financial reporting for 1987.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The City Council could request the staff to make a more
detailed presentation of the unaudited 1987 Financial Report
at this time or at a future Council Study Session. However,
a detailed presentation of the audited report will be
presented in the month of June, 1988.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Financial Report be formally accepted at the April 11 City
Council meeting.
Respectf ly submitted,
Jame XD.rosser
City Manager
JDP:sb
FINANCIAL REPORT SUMMARY - 1987
0
•
The following is a summary of fund highlights for the General
Fund, Utility Funds, Golf Course Fund and Municipal Liquor Fund.
A thorough audited report will be presented to the City Council
as soon as it becomes available.
General Fund
1987 Actual 1987 Budget 1986 Actual
Revenues $10,473,690 $ 99962,470 $ 9,703,977
Expenditures 91907,407 9,881,050 9,108,184
Net Transfers (84,406) (81,420) (188,470)
Increase to Fund
Balance 481,877 0 407,323
12/31 Fund Balance $ 4,652,929 $ 4,171,052 $ 4,171,052
The General Fund of the City has a 1987 year-end Fund Balance of
$4,652,929, as compared to $4,171,052 at year-end 1986.
The fund balance increase of $481,877 is due largely to increases
in revenues collected which were not budgeted, such as storm
disaster aid of approximately $166,000 and a permit purchase
rebate of $31,664. In addition, there were additional revenues
collected over budget in the deputy registrar function, Community
Center, park and recreation, and swimming pool, as well as
through municipal court fines.
Expenditures came in over budget, due to the costs associated
with the storm damage experienced during the summer flooding.
Much of those costs will be reimbursed or have been reimbursed by
federal and state funds.
All Departments showed a continued commitment to containing the
cost of operations.
Water Utility Fund
Revenues
Expenses
Net Transfers
Net Income
12/31 Retained
Earnings
1987 Actual
1,850,555
1,112,595
(69,024)
668,936
$ 2,983,693
1987 Budget
1,867,000
1,217,050
(69,040)
580,910
$ 2,895,667
1986 Actual
1,522,058
1,059,789
(88,782)
373,487
$ 2,314,757
The Water Fund experienced a positive financial position for
1987. Net Income for 1987 was $668,936, which was a 79% increase
from the previous year. The dry early summer attributed to the
large increase in net income. Due to the exceptional year, water
rates were not raised for 1988.
Available cash in the Water Utility Fund is necessary to fund
capital improvements for the operation. This greatly reduces the
possibility that the City would require bonds to make emergency
repairs or upgrades to the water utility system. In 1987, the
• sludge dewatering facility was completed and is being funded
through the cash balance of the Water Utility Fund. Currently,
the City is experiencing an emergency problem with City Well
No. 7. These repairs will be paid for from the Water Fund's fund
balance.
Sewer Utility Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Transfers
Net Income
12/31 Retained
Earnings
1987 Actual
1,311,505
1,039,112
(24,466)
247,927
$ 3,198,694
1987 Budaet
$ 1,212,510
1,003,710
(24,480)
184,320
$ 3,135,087
1986 Actual
1,205,183
935,533
(50,802)
218,848
$ 2,950,767
The Sewer Fund showed net income in 1987 of $247,927, notably
higher than the estimated $184,000 level. The fund continues to
receive loan payments from the Golf Course. That loan is
targeted for full repayment during 1989. The $40,000 payment for
1987 leaves approximately $55,000 remaining on the original
$230,000 loan.
Storm Sewer Utility
1987 Actual 1987 Budget 1986 Actual
Revenues $ 355,402 449,930 306,189
• Expenditures
Net Transfers 279,594
(5,400) 398,940
(5,400) 206,042
(8,310)
Net Income 70,408 45,590 91,837
12/31 Retained
Earnings $ 328,916 $ 304,098 $ 2589508
The Storm Sewer Utility performed much as expected for 1987. Net
income for 1987 was $70,408, which was more than expected. There
were a number of pass-through costs in this fund related to the
1987 storm. However, federal and state disaster aid offset the
added costs. It should be noted that the impact of the flooding
experienced in 1987 may cause some problems which surface in
1988.
Golf Course Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Transfers
Net Income
Transfer to City
Garage
12/31 Retained
Earnings
1987 Actual
$ 843,759
660,944
(36,906)
145,909
(32,612)
$ 113,074
1987 Bud et
864,830
718,920
(36,960)
95,626
$ 108,727 $ (223)
1986 Actual
717,240
591,221
(30,393)
Fiscal year 1986 reflected the last year of covering large
retained deficits from previous years. Thus, the entire net
income from 1986 was used to balance previous losses. In 1987,
the net income is free of a previous retained deficit.
*//-J
1987 was an
operation.
income was
year.
exceptionally good year for the Golf Course
Total revenues far exceeded the previous year and net
$145,909. This compares with $95,626 the previous
Liquor Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Net Transfer
Net Income
12/31 Retained
Earnings
1987 Actual
$5,855,014
5,458,428
(392,131)
4,455
$ 1,675,710
1987 Budoet
$ 6,029,000
5,321,810
(392,120)
315,070
$ 1,986,325
1986 Actual
5,685,977
5,172,963
(478,646)
34,368
$ 1,671,255
Year-end revenues for 1987 reached a record $5,855,014 as
compared to $5,685,977 the previous year. This 1987 year-end
revenue figure also was the highest total of any municipal liquor
operation in the State of Minnesota once again.
While sales were at a record high, the operation did not realize
profits of the previous year because of a lower gross margin on
products sold. However, it was a very good year for the
operation and provided a $300,000 transfer to the Special Revenue
Fund.
The 1987 Budget projected greater net income than actually
• occurred. That is due to the fact that an expected $306,500
payment for the old Cedar Avenue Liquor Store property did not
occur in 1987. Instead, sale proceeds will be received in 1988.
This financial report summary represents the highlights of the
overall financial report for Richfield. Financial reports for
all funds are attached to this letter, including internal service
funds not specially highlighted herein.
A comprehensive review of the 1987 financial operations will be
presented to the City Council once the auditors' report is
complete.
In general, 1987 was a very favorable year for the City's
financial operations. Additions to the City's fund balances will
be very helpful to retain financial stability as the City faces
potential future revenue shortfalls.
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM F
. GENERAL FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Cash and temporary cash investments $4,659,753 $4,356,475
Receivables:
Taxes 108,681 74,235
Special Assessments 6,819 1,291
Accounts 69,392 77,247
Due from other funds 18,792 30,089
Due from other governments 241,231 123,395
Total Assets $5,104,668 $4,662,732
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
Liabilities:
•
Accounts payable 86,238 $ 137,154
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 224,869 200,872
Due to other governments 58,190 101,044
Deferred revenue 82,442 52,610
Total Liabilities 451,739 491,680
Fund Balance:
Reserved for:
Cable television 36,009 49,373
Public Safety 4,035
Encumbrances 21,427 72,907
Unreserved:
Designated 665,885 618,807
Undesignated 3,925,573 3,429,965
Total Fund Balance 4,652,929 4,171,052
Total Liabilities and Fund Balance $5,104,668 $4,662,732
0
/// ?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES COMPARED TO BUDGET
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1986
1987
Taxes:
Current ad
Current ad
fiscal di
Delinquent
Penalties,
tax sales
valorem
valorem -
sparities
ad valorem
interest, and forfeited
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
$3,002,010 $3,029,791 $ 27,781 $2,944,363
540,900 540,901 1 456,490
15,000 22,208 7,208 46,697
7
000 19,093 12,093 21,843
,
3,564,910 3,611,993 47,083 3,469,393
120,000 144,538 24,538 111,914
170,000 199,330 29,330 163,378
290
000 343,868 53,868 275,292
,
9,000 8,458 (542) 9,218
158,325 158,325
3,122,390 3,122,395 5 3,003,840
1,325,600 1,326,320 720 1,215,409
6,000 6,280 280 6,120
129,370 129,368 (2) 149,922
16,254
208 208 282
15,000 12,000 (3,000) 6,000
31,664 31,664
8,698 8,698
99,000 100,006 1,006 99,149
5,000 5,265 265
4,711,360 4,908,987 197,627 4,506,194
Total Taxes
Licenses and Permits:
Business licenses
Nonbusiness licenses and permits
Total Licenses and Permits
lantergovernmental Revenue:
Federal:
Civil defense reimbursement
Disaster aid
State:
Local government aid
Homestead credit
Law officer training
State-aid street maintenance
Warning system reimbursement
Natural Resources grant
Energy grant
Surcharge rebate
Disaster aid
County:
Community health services
Community Development Block Grant
Total Intergovernmental Revenue
LJ
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM F-1
GENERAL FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES
IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1986
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
Revenues:
Taxes $3,564,910 $ 3,611,993 $ 47,083 $3,469,393
Licenses and permits 290,000 343,868 53,868 275,292
Intergovernmental revenue 4,711,360 4,908,987 197,627 4,506,194
Charges for services 927,710 1,015,390 87,680 882,052
Fines and forfeits 312,700 326,553 13,853 337,552
Miscellaneous revenues 155,790 266,899 111,109 233,494
Total Revenues
9,962,470 10,473,690
511,220 9,703,977
Expenditures:
General Government
Administrative Services
Public Safety
Community Development
Community Services
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues
over Expenditure
Other Financing Sources (Uses):
Operating transfers in (out):
Community Development
Block Grant Fund
Municipal Liquor Fund
Water Utility Fund
Sewer Utility Fund
Golf Course Fund
Storm Sewer Utility Fund
Central Garage Fund
Data Processing Fund
Self Insurance Fund
Total Other Financing
Sources (Uses)
Excess of Revenues
and Other Sources over
Expenditures and Other Uses
fund Balance - January 1
Fund Balance - December 31
495,530 507,192 11,662 483,688
841,920 820,784 (21,136) 733,359
4,867,320 4,853,856 (13,464) 4,600,546
.210,290 231,795 21,505 101,720
3,465,990 3,493,780 27,790 3,188,871
9,881,050 9,907,407 26,357 9,108,184
81,420 566,283 484,863 595,793
(3,166) (3,166)
69,250 69,250 66,670
26,380 26,380 25,360
13,700 13,700 13,180
25,000 25,000 16,540
5,000 5,000
(18,550) (18,550) (22,736)
(132,780)
(202,200) (200,020) 180 (154,704)
(81,420) (84,406) (2,986) (188,470)
481,877
4,171,052 4,171,052
$4.171.052 1 4.657.424
481,877 407,323
3,763,729
$481,877 $4,171,052
#// f
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM F-2
. GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF REVEN UES COMPARED TO BUDGET (CONCLUDED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1986
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
Charges for Services:
General Government $ 45,000 $ 53,452 $ 8,452 $ 46,924
Deputy Registrar 245,000 259,164 14,164 242,123
Public Safety 103,640 110,619 6,979 97,149
Community Development 17,110 18,453 1,343 15,721
Community Services 2,600 1,915 (685) 5,069
Health 5,000 9,114 4,114 9,429
Park and Recreation 89,360 98,194 8,834 86,456
Swimming Pool 88,150 99,835 11,685 80,172
Ice Arena 246,120 249,153 3,033 228,664
Nature Center 20,200 21,049 849 20,399
Center
mmunit
C 530
65 94,442 28,912 49,946
y
o ,
es for Services
Total Char 710
927 1,015,390 87,680 882,052
g ,
Fines and Forfeits:
Municipal court fines
303,000
319,481
16,481
327,376
Forfeited bail 4,700 3,605 (1,095) 4,931
Highway patrol fines 5,000 3,371 (1,629) 5,190
enalties
License 96 96 55
p
Total Fines and Forfeits 700
312 326,553 13,853 337,552
,
Miscellaneous Revenues:
Interest 105,440 184,665 79,225 184,990
Cable TV franchise fee 33,300 33,366 66 30,505
Rent 12,350 13,042 692 7,339
Insurance claims and refunds 125 125 30
Contributions 4,700 17,584 12,884 1,750
Recovery - damage to city property 7,330 7,330 8,777
Other 10,787 10,787 103
Total Miscellaneous Revenues 155,790 266,899 111,109 233,494
Total Revenues $9,962,470 $10,473,690 $511,220 $9,703,977
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
is GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES COMPARED TO BUDGET
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended Dece mber 31, 1986
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
GENERAL GOVERNMENT:
Mayor-Council:
Personal services $ 30,940 $ 30,099 $ (841) $ 30,617
Other services and charges 44,950 41,094 (3,856) 36,602
Supplies 8,600 6,152 (2,448) 7,535
Total 84,490 77,345 (7,145) 743,754
Other Agencies:
Senior outreach services 2,000 2,000 606
Corner stone advocacy 1,250 1,250 5,800
Storefront/Youth action 42,850 42,850 40,800
Project Charlie 111 1,800 1,800 3,160
South Hennepin Human Services 7,100 7,362 262 127
Total 55,000 55,262 262 50,493
• City Manager:
Personal services
101,050
102,419
1,369
80,292
Other services and charges 51,190 59,866 8,676 74,772
Supplies 4,500 4,111 (389) 3,188
Capital outlay 580 189 (391) 615
Total 157,320 166,585 9,265 158,867
Legal:
Personal services 49,280 49,229 (51) 47,555
Other services and charges 149,340 158,771 9,431 151,966
Supplies 100 (100) 53
Total 198,720 208,000 9,280 199,574
Total General Government $495,530 $507,192 $11,662 $483,688
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Administration:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
Capital outlay
Total
$ 92,780 $ 93,913
9,310 8,413
2,340 2,108
250 229
104,680 104,663
$ 1,133
(897)
(232)
(21)
(17)
$ 84,921
7,768
3,171
95,860
Personnel:
Personal services 59,790 58,255 (1,535) 55,614
Other services and charges 27,130 26,432 (698) 18,875
r Supplies 6,050 5,257 (793) 4,561
Capital outlay 330 322 (8) 310
Total 93,300 90,266 (3,034) 79,360
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM F-3
GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES COMPARED TO BUDGET (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1986
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: (Continued)
Youth Employment - Counseling:
Personal services $ 19,610 $ 19,482 $ (128) $ 17,875
Other services and charges 1,280 1,121 (159) 2,512
Supplies 860 536 (324) 584
Total 21,750 21,139 (611) 20,971
Finance:
Personal services 128,780 130,454 1,674. 118,289
Other services and charges 59,510 56,256 (3,254) 41,330
Supplies 12,000 13,943 1,943 6,111
Capital outlay 1,170 1,500 330 1,808
Total 201,460 202,153 693 167,538
City Clerk:
Personal services 171,030 166,180 (4,850) 154,039
Other services and charges 18,690 18,935 245 25,796
Supplies 11,100 8,585 (2,515) 7,685
Capital outlay 107
Total 200,820 193,700 (7,120) 187,627
Election:
Personal serv ices 6,000 7,277 1,277 11,094
Other services and charges 6,900 3,436 (3,464) 12,676
Supplies 4,900 3,723 (1,177) 1,682
Total 17,800 14,436 (3,364) 259452
Assessing:
Personal services 26,550 26,063 (487) 20,662
Other services and charges 127,560 127,087 (473) 117,056
Supplies 4,820 1,766 (3,054) 3,330
Capital Outlay 1,100 1,138 38
Total 160,030 156,054 (3,976) 141,048
Cable Television:
Personal services 8,350 7,469 (881) 5,996
Other services and charges 15,260 12,779 (2,481) 9,422
Supplies 200 (200) 85
Capital outlay 18,270 18,125 (145)
Total 42,080 38,373 (3,707) 15,503
Total Administrative Services $841,920 $820,784 $(211136) $733,359
'// //
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES COMPARED TO BUDGET (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended Decem ber 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Ye ar Ended December 31, 1986
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
PUBLIC SAFETY:
Administration:
Personal services $ 541,890 $ 516,757 $(25,133) $ 495,511
Other services and charges 114,650 105,585 (9,065) 126,553
Supplies 26,000 30,855 4,855 20,397
Capital outlay 25,580 25,425 (155) 17,354
Total 708,120 678,622 (29,498) 659,815
Police Protection:
Personal services 1,897,460 1,909,618 12,158 1,781,344
Other services and charges 308,090 335,582 27,492 339,745
Supplies 46,000 38,551 (7,449) 40,075
Capital outlay 25,370 25,155 (215) 13,905
Total 2,276,920 2,308,906 31,986 2,175,069
Fire Protection:
•
Personal services 1,321,150 1,301,718 (19,432) 1,227,375
Other services and charges 99,700 114,135 14,435 103,321
Supplies 33,000 30,306 (2,694) 23,577
Capital outlay 6,620 25,168 18,548 6,052
Total 1,460,470 1,471,327 10,857 1,360,325
Emergency Services:
Personal services 12,960 9,778 (3,182) 9,738
Other services and charges 28,800 24,037 (4,763) 23,907
Supplies 4,500 3,734 (766) 3,707
Capital outlay 25,000 3,737 (21,263) 34,951
Total 71,260 41,286 (29,974) 72,303
Inspection:
Personal services 161,590 151,502 (10,088) 147,273
Other services and charges 184,460 199,686 15,226 183,487
Supplies 500 668 168 716
Capital outlay 4,000 1,859 (2,141) 1,558
Total 350,550 353,715 3,165 333,034
Total Public Safety $4,867,320 $4,853,856 $(13,464) $4,600,546
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF EXPEND ITURES COMPARED TO BUDGET (CONTINUED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended Dece mber 31, 1986
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
COMMUNITY SERVICES: (Continued)
Swimming Pool: -
Personal services $ 66,670 $ 66,972 $ 302 $ 59,471
Other services and charges 28,150 23,777 (4,373) 24,685
Supplies 14,870 14,957 87 15,067
Capital outlay 1,060 860 (200) 1,092
Total 110,750 106,566 (4,184) 100,315
Community Center:
Personal services 208,640 204,055 (4,585) 189,994
Other services and charges 77,400 100,910 23,510 64,786
Supplies 26,400 25,297 (1,193) 23,539
Capital outlay 2,950 9,202 6,252 935
Total 315,390 339,464 23,984 279,254
• Recreation:
Personal services
189,520
186,173
(3,347)
167,787
Other services and charges 84,190 81,513 (2,677) 71,422
Supplies 27,770 27,006 (764) 18,468
Capital outlay 3,890 2,155 (495) 1,165
Total 305,370 296,847 (7,283) 258,842
Nature Center:
Personal services 181,930 206,643 24,713 174,432
Other services and charges 40,980 44,224 3,244 31,033
Supplies 12,370 16,249 3,879 14,130
Capital outlay 2,400 2,155 (245)
Total 237,680 269,271 31,591 219,595
Engineering:
Personal services 70,760 75,354 4,594 62,066
Other services and charges 10,860 6,107 (4,753) 11,198
Supplies 1,980 2,090 140 1,859
Capital outlay 850 581 (269) 661
Total 84,450 84,132 (288) 75,784
Forestry:
Personal services 106,200 104,887 (1,313) 74,643
Other services and charges 83,650 87,370 3,720 67,925
Supplies 2,430 5,962 3,532 2,480
Capital outlay 660 660 1,959
• Total 192,280 198,879 6,599 1419007
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• GENERAL FUND
SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES COMPARED TO BUDGET (CONCLUDED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
With Comparative Actual Amounts for Year Ended December 31, 1986
COMMUNITY SERVICES: (Continued)
Lyndale/Nicollet Maintenance:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
Capital outlay
Total
Government Buildings:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
Capital outlay
Total
• Park Maintenance:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
Capital outlay
Total
Streets:
Personal services
Other services and charges
Supplies
Capital outlay
Total
Total Community Services
Total Expenditures
FORM F-3
1987
Over
Final (Under) 1986
Budget Actual Budget Actual
$ 770 $ 142 $ (628) $ (405)
4,070 4,831 761 1,146
6,380 5,210 (1,170) 2,271
300 288 (12) 1,766
11,520 10,471 (1,049) 4,778
134,390 131,799 (2,591) 111,713
137,060 138,038 978 .127,884
16,490 17,203 713 14,246
7,200 50,102 42,902 3,272
295,140 337,142 42,002 257,115
362,790 417,898 55,108 355,231
142,200 151,738 9,538 116,064
39,280 39,797 517 48,335
4,650 6,544 1,894 8,649
548,920 615,977 67,057 528,279
294,850 288,716 (6,134) 319,860
540,010 455,321 (84,689) 462,872
84,990 75,843 (9,147) 86,161
18,600 17,538 (1,062) 25,312
938,450 837,418 (101,032) 894.205
$3,465,990 $3,493,780 $ 27,790 $3,1881871
$9,881,050 $9,907,407 $ 26,357 $9,108,184
C.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
WATER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $ 1,226,077 $ 1,236,060
Accounts receivable:
Service charges:
Billed 293,391 220,749
Certified to County Auditor 82,253 70,612
Unbilled services 131,225 143,145
Due from other governments 304
Inventory 6,538 7,276
Total Current Assets 1,739,788 1,677,842
Long-term Assets:
Connection charges receivable:
Edina hookups lAn
. Property and Equipment:
Land 44,500 44,500
Buildings 1,468,519 1,468,519
Office equipment 5,899 5,889
Machinery and equipment 2,963,119 2,294,992
Other improvements 6,464,087 6,464,087
10,946,114 10,277,987
Less accumulated depreciation 3,706,238 3,499,499
Net Property and Equipment 7,239,876 6,778,488
Total Assets t R_070 AAA 4 0 AKA GGC
0
FORM K-9
•
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY 1987 1986
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 40,120 $ 106,495
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 32,010 39,164
Contracts payable 5,000 81,000
Due to other funds:
Housing & Redevelopment Special Revenue 86
General Obligation Bonds 20,000 20,000
Total Current Liabilities 97,216 246,659
Long-term Liabilities:
Customer deposits 532,137 528,296
Deferred revenues - connection charges:
Edina hookups 180 225
Total Long-term Liabilities 532,317 528.521
Total Liabilities 629,533 775,180
Fund Equity:
• Contributed capital:
Special assessments 3,196,500 3,196,500
City aid for construction 2,140,118 2,140,118
Federal grant 30,000 30,000
Total Contributed Capital 5,366,618 5,366,618
Retained Earnings:
Unreserved 2, 983 ,693 2 ,314, 757
Total Retained Earnings 2, 983 ,693 2 ,314, 757
Total Fund Equity 8, 350 ,311 7 ,681, 375
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $8, 979, 844 $8, 456, 555
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-10
WATER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sales:
Charges for services $1,760,864 $1,471,339
Operating Expenses:
Personal services 382,979 372,581
Other services and charges 334,236 321,792
Supplies 188,641 156,685
Depreciation 206,739 208,731
Total Operating Expenses 1,112,595 1,059,789
Operating Income 648,269 411,550
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest 86,755 78,966
Gain (loss) on sale of property 2,416 (28,247)
Storm Disaster aid 520
• Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 89,691 50,719
Income Before Operating Transfers 737,960 462,269
Operating Transfers (Out):
General Fund (26,380) (25,360)
Special Assessment Fund (201000) (20,000)
Data Processing Fund (27,000)
Self Insurance Fund (22,644) (16 422)
Total Operating Transfers (Out) (69,024) (88,782)
Net Income 668,936 373,487
Retained Earnings - January 1 2,314,757 1,941,270
Retained Earnings - December 31 $2,983,693 $2,314,757
?J
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-11
• WATER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $668,936 $373,487
Item not requiring current working capital:
Depreciation 206,739 208,731
Working Capital Provided by Operations 875,675 582,218
Increase in deposits 3,841 3,291
Decrease in long-term assets 45 945
Disposition of equipment 38,975
Total Sources of Working Capital 879,561 625,429
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 668,127 354,795
Decrease in liabilities payable from deferred assets 45 945
Total Uses of Working Capital 668,172 355,740
Net Increase in Working Capital $211,389 $269,689
•
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in
Working Capital:
Cash and investments $ (9,983) $454,001
Accounts receivable 72,363 (26,852)
Due from other governments 304
Inventory (738) 3,178
Accounts payable 66,375 (75,448)
Accured salaries and employee benefits payable 7,154 (4,190)
Due to other funds (86)
Contracts payable 76,000 (81,000)
Net Increase in Working Capital $211,389 $269,689
0
L?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
WATER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987
Sales:
Charges for services:
Water sales metered
Water availability
Connection charges
Customer services
Sales of material and supplies
Certification fee
Penalty charge
Customer service charge
Total Sales
$1,649,195
1,620
72
13,001
3,587
3,630
14,141
75,618
$1,760,864
FORM K-12
1986
$1,360,160
2,904
527
15,984
1,220
3,500
13,568
73,476
$1.471.339
0
//- If
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-13
WATER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Treatment and Distribution:
Personal Services:
Salaries $ 279,886 $ 278,329
Interdepartmental labor 24,571 25,246
Retirement contributions 36,767 33,281
Health and life insurance contributions 20,832 15,610
Total Personal Services 362,056 352,466
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 13,452 22,096
Advertising and publications 115 42
Maintenance and repairs 75,593 70,123
Professional services 4,543 3,965
Communications 901 3,035
Travel and subsistence 5,674 3,193
Subscriptions and memberships 947 965
Utilities 175,113 139,055
Insurance, bonds, and licenses 45,275 53,558
Other contractual services 595 785
Total Other Services and Charges 322,208 296,817
Supplies:
Office 380 674
Clothing 1,096 640
Parts, tools, and supplies 12,473 16,208
Chemicals 168,432 133,195
Total Supplies 182,381 150,717
Depreciation 206,739 208,731
Total Treatment and Distribution 1,073,384 1,008,731
Collection and Billing:
Personal Services:
Salaries 17,859 16,858
Retirement contributions 2,079 1,937
Health and life insurance contributions 985 1,320
Total Personal Services 20,923 20,115
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 9,023 22,027
Maintenance and repairs 202 294
Professional services 2,360 2,100
Insurance 443 554
Total Other Services and Charges 12,028 24,975
Supplies:
Office supplies 6,260 5,968
Total Collection and Billing 39,211 51,058
Total Operating Expenses $1,112,595 $1,059,789
x//-02 d
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
•
SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE BALAN CE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $1,281,237 $ 847,961
Accounts receivable:
Service charges:
Unbilled services 113,128 121,195
Accrued interest receivable - Golf Course Fund 642 1,108
Advance to Storm Sewer Utility Fund
Due from other governments:
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission:
Interceptor acquisition - current 79,902 76,829
Operating cost adjustment (1986 and 1985) 112,296 166,445
State of Minnesota 5,016
Total Current Assets 1,592,221 1,213,538
Long-term Assets:
Long-term advance - Golf Course 55,000 95,000
Due from other governments:
• Metropolitan Waste Control Commission:
Operating cost adjustment (1987 and 1986) 53,402 112,296
Reserve capacity 29,873 39,427
Interceptor acquisition contract 1,248,606 1,328,508
Total Long-term Assets 1,386,881 1,575,231
Property and Equipment:
Land 29,050 9,050
Buildings 527,634 479,245
Office equipment 1,244 1,244
Machinery and equipment 86,937 73,908
Other improvements 54,055 41,269
698,920 604,716
Less accumulated depreciation 314,250 289,613
Net Property and Equipment 384,670 315,103
Total Assets $3,363,772 $3,103,872
LJ
#j/-?21
9
0
FORM K-14
1987 1986
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 5,743 $ 1,377
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 28,225 17,326
Due to other governments:,
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission:
Reserve capacity charges 3,292
Total Current Liabilities 33,968 21,995
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital:
City 131,110 131,110
Retained Earnings:
Unreserved 3,198,694 2,950,767
Total Fund Equity 3,329,804 3,081,877
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $3,363,772 $3,103,872
L
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-15
I'q
n
U
SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sales:
Charges for services $1,162,868 $1,093,255
Miscellaneous revenues 522 12
Total Sales 1,163,390 1,093,267
Operating Expenses:
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission:
Sewer service charges 764,164 694,542
Personal services 180,954 148,391
Other services and charges 55,784 59,345
Supplies 13,573 9,591
Depreciation 24,637 23,664
Total Operating Expenses 1,039,112 935,533
Operating Income 124,278 157,734
Nonoperating Revenues:
Interest 139,516 111,916
Storm disaster aid 8,599
Total Nonoperating Revenues 148,115 111,916
Income Before Operating Transfers 272,393 269,650
Operating Transfers (Out):
General Fund (13,700) (13,180)
Capital Project Fund
Data Processing Fund (27,000)
Self Insurance Fund (10,766) (10,622)
Total Operating Transfers (Out) (24,466) (50,802)
Net Income 247,927 218,848
Retained Earnings - January 1 2,950,767 2,731,919
Retained Earnings - December 31 $3,198,694 $2,950,767
1]
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-16
•
n
U
SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $247,927 $218,848
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation 24,637 23,664
Working Capital Provided by Operations 272,564 242,512
Decrease in long-term assets:
Due from Metropolitan Waste Control Commission:
Reserve capacity 9,554 10,759
Operating cost adjustment 58,894 54,149
Interceptor acquisition contract 79,902 76,829
Decrease in long-term advance 40,000 40,000
Total Sources of Working Capital 460,914 424,249
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 94,204 5,222
Total Uses of Working Capital 94,204 5,222
Net Increase in Working Capital $3661710 $419,027
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in
Working Capital:
Cash and investments $433,276 $645,318
Accounts receivable (8,067) 4,107
Due from other funds (466) (370,917)
Due from other governments (46,060) 103,330
Accounts payable (4,366) (886)
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable (10,899) (1,049)
Due to other governments 3,292 39,124
Net Increase in Working Capital $366,710 $419,027
r?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-17
• SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sales:
Charges for services:
Sewer user charges $1,098,277 $1,029,705
Reserve capacity charges 1,660 1,995
Sewer certification charges 3,630 3,500
Customer service charges 50,212 48,526
Penalty charge 9,089 9,529
Total Charges for Services 1,162,868 1,093,255
Miscellaneous:
Sale of material 22 12
Rental of property 500
Total Miscellaneous 522 12
Total Sales 1,163,390 1,093,267
Operating Expenses:
. Sewer service charges 764,164 694,542
Personal services 180,954 148,391
Other services and charges 55,784 59,345
Supplies 13,573 - 9,591
Depreciation 24,637 23,664
Total Operating Expenses 1,039,112 935,533
Operating Income 124,278 157,734
Nonoperating Revenues:
Interest:
Deferred current value credit 56,213 59,168
Reserve capacity 534 2,239
Investments 76,586 41,526
Golf Course 6,183 8,983
Storm disaster aid 8,599
Total Nonoperating Revenues 148,115 111,916
Income Before Operating Transfers $ 272,393 $ 269,650
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-18
. SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF OPERATING E XPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sewer Service Charge - Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission:
Treatment charges $ 764,164 $694,542
Maintenance:
Personal Services:
Salaries 175,479 84,686
Interdepartmental labor (credit) (46,287) 14,386
Retirement contributions 17,365 14,598
Health and life insurance contributions 9,627 11,970
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 22,633 18,311
Maintenance and repair of equipment 1,831 592
Expert and professional services 5,399 15
Communications 917 875
Travel and subsistence 1,080 1,317
Utility services 5,313 4,632
Insurance, bonds, and permits 8,183 9,709
Other contractual services 596 1,156
• Supplies:
Parts, tools, and supplies 7,923 3,701
Depreciation 24,637 23,664
Total Maintenance 234,696 189,612
Collection and Billing:
Personal Services:
Salaries 20,538 18,601
Interdepartmental labor 112 369
Retirement contributions 2,224 1,983
Health and life insurance contributions 1,896 1,798
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 6,878 19,783
Maintenance and repair of equipment 202 241
Professional sevice 2,293 2,100
Communications 30
Insurance and bonds 459 584
Supplies:
Office supplies 5,650 5,890
Total Collection and Billing 40,252 51,379
Total Operating Expenses $1,039,112 $935,533
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-24
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $ 471,468 $ 459,851
Accounts receivable:
Service charges:
Unbilled services 41,997 47,058
Due from other governments 35,656
Total Current Assets 549,121 506,909
Restricted Assets:
Cash and investments for debt service 128,046 132,124
Property and Equipment:
Machinery and equipment 1,624 1,624
Other improvements 2,293,539 2,281,145
2,295,163 2,282,769
Less accumulated depreciation 38,840 457
Net Property and Equipment 2,256,323 2,282,312
. Total Assets $2,933,490 $2,921,345
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 14,108 $ 6,906
Current Liabilities (Payable from Restricted Assets):
Accrued interest payable 65,466 130,931
Bonds payable (due in one year) 60,000
Total Current Liabilities
(Payable from Restricted Assets) 125,466 130,931
Long-term Liabilities:
Bonds payable (due after one year) 2,465,000 2,525,000
Total Liabilities 2,604,574 2,662,837
Fund Equity:
Retained earnings:
Reserved for construction 199,360
Unreserved 328.916 59.148
Total Fund Equity 328 ,916 258, 508
. Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $2,933 ,490 $2,921, 345
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES,
AND CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987
•
Sales:
FORM K-25
1986
Charges for services $391,377 $383,646
Customer service charges 15,962 16,636
Penalty charge 4,365 3,267
Total Sales 411,704 403,549
Operating Expenses:
Personal services 98,739 113,926
Other services and charges 74,179 88,479
Supplies 68,293 3,312
Depreciation 38,383 325
Total Operating Expenses 279,594 206,.042
Operating Income 132,110 197,507
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest 40,220 79,278
Storm disaster aid 61,011
Bond discount expense (44,995)
Interest and fiscal charges (157,533) (131,643)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) (56,302) (97,360)
Income Before Operating Transfers 75,808 100,147
Operating Transfers (Out):
General Fund (51000)
Data Processing Fund (8,100)
Self Insurance Fund (400) (210)
Total Operating Transfers (Out) (5,400) (8,310)
Net Income 70,408 91,837
Retained Earnings - January 1 258,508 166,671
Retained Earnings - December 31 $328,916 $258,508
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-26
• STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $ 70,408 $ 91,837
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation 38,383 325
Working Capital Provided by Operations 108,791 92,162
Increase in current liabilities payable
from restricted assets 130,931
Increase in bonds payable 2,525,000
Decrease in restricted assets 4,078
Total Sources of Working Capital 112,869 2,748,093
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 12,394 1,769,912
Increase in restricted assets 132,124
Decrease in current liabilities payable from
restricted assets 5,465
Decrease in long term bonds payable 60,000
Total Uses of Working Capital 77,859 1,902,036
Net Increase in Working Capital $ 35,010 $ 846,057
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in
Working Capital:
Cash and investments 11,617 $ 457,893
Accounts receivable (5,061) 5,262
Due from other governments 35,656
Accounts payable (7,202) 12,902
Due to other funds 370,000
Net Increase in Working Capital $ 35,010 $ 846,057
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-27
• STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Personal Services:
Interdepartmental labor $ 98,739 $113,926
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 50,624 62,250
Maintenance and repairs 3,979 14,553
Professional services 15,540 7,426
Travel and subsistence 1,076 1,128
Utilities 1,757 1,709
Insurance 1,203
Other contractual services 1,413
Total Other Services and Charges 74,179 88,479
Supplies: -
Office 190 420
Parts, tools, and supplies 68,103 2,892
Total Supplies 68,293 3,312
is Depreciation 38,383 325
Total Operating Expenses $279,594 $206,042
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-28
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN ASSETS RESTRICTED
FOR REVENUE BOND DEBT SERVICE
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
Cash and investments at beginning of year
Cash Receipts:
Transfer from operating cash
Cash Disbursements:
Construction expenditures
Interest payments
Fiscal agent's fee
Total Cash Disbursements
Cash and investments at end of year
0
Revenue Bond
Debt Service
$132,124
155,533
4,078
155,117
416
159,611
$128,046
0
-6el?l --?'
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-20
• MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sales and Cost of Sales:
479
$806
$709,870
User fees
Sales of merchandise and concession ,
135,618 122,244
Less cost of sales (59,267) (56,648)
Gross Profit 882,830 775,466
Operating Expenses:
412
324
291,560
Personal services
,
546
124
672
112
Other services and charges ,
081
102 ,
79,675
Supplies
Depreciation ,
109,905 107,314
Total Operating Expenses 660,944 591,221
Operating Income 221,886 184,245
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest 27,345 21,819
•
Storm disaster aid 7,476
Miscellaneous 1,001 366
Interest and fiscal charges (74,893) (80,411)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) (39,071) (58,226)
Income Before Operating Transfers 182,815 126,019
Operating Transfers (Out):
000)
(25
(16,540)
General Fund , (5
400)
Data Processing Fund ,
Self Insurance Fund (11,906) (8,453)
Total Operating Transfers (Out) (36,906) (30,393)
Net Income 145,909 95,626
Retained Deficit - January 1 (223) (95,849)
Equity Transfers out to Central Garage (32,612)
Retained Earnings (Deficit) - December 31 $113,074 $ (223)
0
7-11,11-J_?_
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-21
• MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $145,909 $ 95,626
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation 109,905 107,314
Working Capital Provided by Operations 255,814 202,940
Net increase in current liabilities payable
from restricted assets 4,558
Sale of property and equipment 101
Total Sources of Working Capital 255,915 207,498
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 82,916 74,423
Net decrease in current liabilities
payable from restricted assets 500
Net increase in restricted assets 8,973 9,334
Decrease in long-term bonds payable 50,000 50,000
Decrease in long-term advance 40,000 40,000
Total Uses of Working Capital 182,389 173,757
Net Increase in Working Capital $ 73,526 $ 33,741
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in
Working Capital:
Cash and investments 93,296 $ 40,796
Accounts receivable 4,358 (138)
Due from other governments 4,361
Inventory 2,141 (2,840)
Accounts payable (13,511) (99)
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 355 (4,895)
Accrued interest payable 466 917
Contracts payable (17,940)
Net Increase in Working Capital $ 731526 $ 33,741
0
-17,i/-,f2
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-22
• MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Personal Services:
Salaries $287,689 $254,930
Interdepartmental labor 9,841 13,159
Retirement contributions 21,216 18,253
Health and life insurance contributions 5,666 5,218
Total Personal Services 324,412 291,560
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 63,978 51,822
Advertising and publications 1,887 1,568
Maintenance and repairs 8,755 10,300
Professional services 1,238 1,181
Communications 5,556 5,425
Travel and subsistence 3,802 3,596
Subscriptions and memberships 922 1,089
Utilities 17,098 14,578
Insurance, bonds, and licenses 21,310 23,113
• Total Other Services and Charges 124,546 112,672
Supplies:
Office 2,019 1,957
Parts, tools, and supplies 100,062 77,718
Total Supplies 102,081 79,675
Depreciation 109,905 107,314
Total Operating Expenses $660,944 $5911221
11
7 /-J f/
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN ASSETS RESTRICTED
FOR REVENUE BOND DEBT SERVICE
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
Cash and investments at beginning of year
Cash Receipts:
Interest earnings:
Investments
Transfer from operating cash
Total Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements:
Principal payments
Interest payments
Fiscal agent's fee
Total Cash Disbursements
•
Cash and investments at end of year
FORM K-23 -
Revenue Bond
Debt Service
$286,291
8,320
118,710
127,030
50,000
68,522
188
$294,611
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments
Accounts receivable
Due from other governments
Inventory
Total Current Assets
Restricted Assets:
Cash and investments:
Revenue bond debt service
Accrued interest receivable
Total Restricted Assets
Property and Equipment:
Land
• Buildings
Office equipment
Machinery and equipment
Other improvements
Less accumulated depreciation
Net Property and Equipment
Total Assets
1987 1986
$ 99,365 $ 6,069
4,358
4,361
28.173 26,032
136,257 32,101
294,611 286,291
2,610 1,957
297,221 288,248
57,865 57,865
415,654 393,903
7,413 6,583
242,438 259,104
1,362,640 1,321,596
2,086,010 2,039,051
688.976 582,315
1,397,034 1,456,736
Qi RZn r.17 41 777_nA;
17J
FORM K-19
0
•
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities (Payable from Current Assets):
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable
Accrued interest payable - Sewer Utility Fund
Contracts payable
Total Current Liabilities
(Payable from Current Assets)
Current Liabilities (Payable from Restricted Assets):
Accrued interest payable
Bonds payable (due in one year)
Total Current Liabilities
(Payable from Restricted Assets)
Long-term Liabilities:
Bonds payable (due after one year)
Advance payable from Sewer Utility Fund
Total Long-term Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital:
City
Retained Earnings:
Reserved for revenue bond retirement
Unreserved
Total Retained Earnings (Deficit)
Total Fund Equity
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
1987 1986
$ 15,585 $ 2,074
12,578 12,933
642 1,108
17.940
46,745 16,115
11,004 11,504
50,000 50,000
61,004
975,000
55,000
1,030,000
1,137,749
61,504
1,025,000
95,000
1,120,000
1,197,619
579,689 579,689
236,217 226,744
(123,143) (226,967)
113,074 (223)
692,763
Itl_a'ln_512
579,466
Iti »>_na5
??e//-j 7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-5
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sales and Cost of Sales:
Sales $5,800,621 $5,611,299
Less cost of sales (4,654,168) (4,408,972)
Gross Profit 1,146,453 1,202,327
Operating,Expenses:
Personal services 456,824 421,806
Other services and charges 273,228 282,819
Supplies 25,572 22,334
Depreciation 48,636 37,032
Total Operating Expenses 804,260 763,991
Operating Income 342,193 438,336
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest 48,864 68,219
Commissions
Miscellaneous revenues 4,730 3,848
6,230 12,655
Miscellaneous expenses (5,431) (10,044)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 54,393 74,678
Income Before Operating Transfers 396,586 513,014
Operating Transfers (Out):
General Fund (69,250) (66,670)
Special Revenue Fund (300,000) (315,000)
Data Processing Fund (75,600)
Self Insurance Fund (22,881) (21,376)
Total Operating Transfers (Out) (392,131) (478,646)
Net Income 4,455 34,368
Retained Earnings - January 1 1,671,255 1,636,887
Retained Earnings - December 31 $1,675,710 $1,671,255
r
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987
•
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation
Working Capital Provided by Operations
Disposition of equipment
Total Sources of Working Capital
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment
Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in
Working Capital:
Cash and investments
Accounts receivable
Due from other governments
Inventory
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable
Contracts payable
Deferred revenue
Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital
$ 4,455
48.636
53,091
3,566
56,657
428,899
(372,242)
$(483,705)
82,358
192
(10,633)
(18,893)
(9,451)
82,890
(15,000)
$(372,242)
FORM K-6
1986
$ 34,368
37,032
71,400
71,400
203,616
(132,216)
$ (87,076)
(936)
1,540
45,500
(3,354)
(82,890)
(5,000)
$(132,216)
7i`// j f
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BY STORE
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
Sales
Cost of Sales:
Inventory, January 1
Purchases
Total Merchandise Available for Sale
Less: Inventory, December 31
Cost of Sales
Gross Profit on Sales
Percentage of Gross Profit to Sales
Less: Operating Expenses
Operating Income Before Depreciation
Less: Depreciation
Operating Income
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest - investments
Commissions
Rents
Refunds
Gain on sale of equipment
Bad checks
Cash long (short)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)
Net Income Before Operating Transfers
All Stores
1987 1986
$5,800,621 $5,611,299
387,182
4,643,535
5,030,717
385,642
4,410,512
4,796,154
376,549
4,654,168
1,146,453
755,624
390,829
48,636
342,193
48,864
4,730
50
4,304
1,876
(4,379)
(1,052)
54,393
Q 1ati rRA
387,182
4,408,972
1,202,327
726,959
475,368
37,032
438,336
68,219
3,848
660
11,995
(9,544)
(500)
74,678
Q riz nia
0
#//
FORM K-7
0
Lyndale Store
1987 1986
$2,191,287 $2,085,461
Cedar Store
1987 1986
$1,969,269 $1,795,449
Penn Store
1987 1986
$1,640,065 $1,730,389
146,358 144,902 139,491 152,023 101,333 88
717
1,786,598 1,656,032 1,572,773 1,398,112 1,284,164 ,
1,356,368
1,932,956 1,800,934 1,712,264 1,550,135 1,385,497 1,445,085
158,529 146,358 125,736 139,491 92,284 101,333
1,774,427 1,654,576 1,586,528 1
410
644 1
293
213 1
343
752
,
, ,
, ,
,
416,860 430,885 382,741 384
805 346
852 386
637
, , ,
19.0% 20.7% 19.4% 21.4% 21.1% 22.3%
279,553 262,792 253,718 251,718 222,353 212,449
• 137,307 168,093 129,023 133,087 124,499 174
188
16,368 16,232 21,660 11
607 10
608 ,
9
193
, , ,
120,939 151,861 107,363 1212480 113,891 164,995
13,597 25,241 25,088 21,830 10,179 21,148
1,803 1,257 1,685 1,987 1,242 604
50 660
1,590 205 1,536 11,584 1,178 206
1,925 (49)
(1,906) (3,574) (1,774) (2,465) (699) (3
505)
(319) (367) (713) (265) (20) ,
132
14,815 22,762 27,747 33,331 11,831 18,585
$ 135,754 $ 174,623 $ 135,110 $ 1542811 $ 125,722 $ 183,580
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
COMPARATIVE SCHEDULE OF OPERATING EXPENSES BY STORE
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
All Stores
1987 1986
Personal Services:
Salaries - regular employees $394,703 $363,141
Interdepartmental labor services 12,757 12,574
City contribution to PERA and FICA 34,908 31,960
Hospitalization and insurance 14,456 14,131
Total Personal Services 456,824 421,806
•
Other Services and Charges:
Rents and leases 35,986 59,610
Advertising and publications 55,260 50
496
Maintenance and repair 12,559 ,
7
372
Expert and professional services 10,696 ,
14
094
Communication and travel 14,693 ,
8
269
Subscriptions and memberships 1,048 ,
936
Utilities 30,880 35
121
Insurance, bonds, taxes, and licenses 99,732 ,
86
991
Burglar alarm 5,440 ,
2
493
Other contractual services 6,934 ,
17,437
Total Other Services and Charges 273,228 282,819
Supplies:
Office supplies 2,433 2
070
Small tools and minor equipment 18,532 ,
17
557
General supplies 4,607 ,
2,707
Total Supplies 25,572 22,334
Total Operating Expenses
Excluding Depreciation 755,624 726,959
Depreciation 48,636 37,032
Total Operating Expenses
Including Depreciation $804,260 $763,991
FORM K-8
•
Lyndale Store Cedar Store
1987 1986 1987 1986
Penn Store
1987 1986
$144,752 $137,383 $129,872 $116,690 $120,079 $109,068
4,245 5,416 5,980 5,646 2,532 1,512
12,135 10,360 10,772 9,718 12,001 11,882
4,860 4,936 4,338 4,291 5,258 4,904
165,992 158,095 150,962 136,345 139,870 127,366
12,188 20,027 12,073 19,750 11,725 19,833
18,018 16,832 19,602 16,832 17,640 16,832
3,633 3,164 4,712 2,713 4,214 1,495
3,596 3,602 3,953 6,890 3,147 3,602
3,430 3,199 7,928 2,840 3,335 2,230
350 308 353 320 345 308
15,988 13,698 10,817 15,218 4,075 6,205
39,740 30,668 30,456 29,657 29,536 26,666
3,256 1,116 1,094 824 1,090 553
2,257 1,766 3,071 14,206 1,606 1,465
102,456 94,380 94,059 109,250 76,713 79,189
1,249 1,078 701 637 483 355
8,417 8,103 5,587 4,579 4,528 4,875
1,439 1,136 2,486 907 682 664
11,105 10,317 8,774 6,123 5,693 5,894
279,553
16,368
$295,921
262,792
16,232
$279,024
253,795
21,660
$275,455
251,718
11,607
$263,325
222,276
10,608
$232,884
212,449
9,193
$221,642
0
-h1i1- 111j
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM K-4
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $ 278,850 $ 762,555
Accounts receivable 91,375 9,017
Due from other governments 192
Inventory 376,549 387,182
Total Current Assets 746,966 1,158,754
Property and Equipment:
Land 313,657 313,657
Buildings 1,161,024 835,388
Office equipment 10,846 15,701
Machinery and equipment 249,248 240,127
Other improvements 114,142 100,635
1,848,917 1,505,-508
Less accumulated depreciation 563,399 596,687
Net Property and Equipment 1,285,518 908,821
Total Assets $2,032,484 $2,067,575
is
LIABILITIES AND FUND EOUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 277,984 $ 259,091
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 58,790 49,339
Contracts payable 82,890
Deferred revenue 20.000 5.000
Total Current Liabilities 356,774 396,320
Fund Equity:
Retained earnings:
Unreserved 1,675,710 1,671,255
Total Retained Earnings 1,675,710 1,671,255
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $2,032,484 $2,067,575
0
sir- r?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
COMBINING SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
For the Year Ended December 31, 1987
Property and Equipment
Balance
Life-Years 1/1/87 Additions Deletions
Central Garage and Equipment Fund
Office equipment 10 $ 3,275 $ 603
Machinery and equipment 1-2 2,570,942 $404,617 264,057
Total 2,574,217 404,617 264,660
Data Processing Fund
Building improvements 8 4,635
Office equipment 5-10 7,431 972
Machinery and equipment 8 479,060 134,785 165,557
Other improvements 10 2,733 177
Total 493,859 134,785 166,706
Central Services Fund
Office equipment 5 130 125 130
Machinery and equipment 5 59,139 3,940 21,540
Other improvements 10 1,318
Total 60,587 4,065 21,670
• Total - All Internal Service Funds $3,128,663 $543,467 $453,036
r
0 $3,219,094 $1,426,274 $381,939 $421,265 $1,386,948
Accumulated Depreciation
Balance Balance Depreciation Balance
12/31/87 1/1/87 Taken Deductions 12/31/87
$ 2,672 $ 1,973 $ 301 $ 603 $ 1,671
2,711,502 1,158,576 291,469 242,469 1,207,576
2,714,174 1,160,549 291,770 243,072 1,209,247
4,635 4,635 4,635
6,459 6,152 478 972 5,658
448,288 222,651 79,782 165,557 136,876
2,556 1,260 276 177 1,359
4619938 234,698 80,536 166,706 148,528
125 105 24 119 10
41,539 30,403 9,465 11,368 28,500
1,318 519 144 663
42,982 31,027 9,633 11,487 29,173
FORM L-3
Net
Asset
Value
$ 1,001
1.503.926
1,504,927
801
311,412
1.197
313,410
115
13,039
655
13,809
$1,832,146
0
#//- 4
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-4
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $682,810 $558,083
Accounts receivable 470
Special assessments receivable:
Current 78,114 96,269
Delinquent 4,781 4,193
Due from other funds:
Capital Project Fund 107,837 144,802
Work in process 15,680 23,263
Total Assets $889,692 $826,610
FUND EQUITY
Retained Earnings:
Unreserved:
Designated for permanent working capital $ 78,139 $ 78,139
Designated for work in process 15,680 23,263
• Undesignated 795,873 725,208
Total Retained Earnings 889,692 826,610
Total Fund Equity $889,692 $826,610
0
oe
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-5
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Operating Revenues:
Special assessments certified $ 26,231 $ 85,716
Operating Expenses:
Other services and charges:
Shade tree program 14,394 17,378
Alley maintenance 11,837 15,121
Other 53 156
Total Operating Expenses 26,284 32,656
Operating Income (Loss) (53) 53,061
Nonoperating Revenues: -
Interest:
Investments 40,855 51,896
Temporary Loans:
Shade tree program 474 705
Capital Project Funds 12,565 7,153
.
Certified on special assessments 9,241 5,088
Total Nonoperating Revenues 63,135 64,842
Income Before Operating Transfers 63,082 117,903
Operating Transfers In (Out):
Capital Project Funds (52,755)
Net Income 63,082 65,148
Retained Earnings - January 1 826,610 761,462
Retained Earnings - December 31 $889,692 $826,610
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $ 63,082'
Total Sources of Working Capital 63,082
Net Increase in Working Capital $ 63,082
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in
Working Capital:
Cash and investments $124,727
Accounts receivable 470
Special assessments receivable (17,567)
Due from other funds (36,965)
Work in process (7,583)
Net Increase in Working Capital $ 63,082
0
FORM L-6
1986
$ 65,148
65,148
$ 65,148
$(116,643)
43,921
144,802
(6.932)
$ 65,148
//- /
I-If
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
CENTRAL GARAGE AND EQUIPMENT FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments
Accounts receivable
Due from other funds:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Due from other governments
Inventory - materials and supplies
Total Current Assets
Property and Equipment:
Office equipment
Machinery and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation
Net Property and Equipment
•
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable
Total Current Liabilities
Fund Equity:
Contributed capital:
City
Federal grant
State grant
Total Contributed Capital
Retained earnings:
Reserved for fire truck replacement
Reserved for communication equipment
Unreserved
Total Retained Earnings
0
Total Fund Equity
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity
1987
$1,357,192
260
140
416
20,993
1,379,001
2,672
2.711.502
2,714,174
1,209,247
1,504,927
Q7 001 090
$ 11,280
14,613
25,893
1,048,160
31,598
27,917
1,107,675
173,249
138,726
1.438.385
1,750,360
2,858,035
$2,883,928
FORM L-7
1986
$1,126,171
21,384
1,147,555
3,275
2.570.942
2,574,217
1,160,549
1,413,668
$2,561,223
$ 38,213
13,865
52,078
957,156
31,598
27,917
1,016,671
162,987
102,281
1.227.206
1,492,474
2,509,145
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-8
• CENTRAL GARAGE AND EQUIPMENT FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 an d 1986
1987 1986
Operating Revenues:
Charges for services:
Billings to departments and City projects $ 747,286 $ 677,142
Operating Expenses:
Cost of materials used:
Inventory - January 1 21,384 18,804
Purchases 139,131 144,623
Total 160,515 163,427
Inventory - December 31 20,993 (21,384)
Total Cost of Materials Used 139,522 142,043
Other Operating Costs:
Salaries and wages 107,926 103,797
Retirement contributions 13,264 12,541
Health and life insurance contributions 7,532 7,792
Rents and leases 14,653 8,400
Contractual maintenance and repairs 20,586 31,900
Travel and subsistence
Insurance and bonds 3,011
33,668 2,343
50,435
Supplies 11,218 9,211
Depreciation 291,770 256;921
Total Other Operating Costs 503,628 483,340
Total Operating Expenses 643,150 625,383
Operating Income 104,136 51,759
Nonoperating Revenues:
Interest 84,805 77,210
Gain on sale of assets 40,013 18,480
Sale of materials 300
Recovery - damage to city property 560 714
Storm disaster aid 712
Total Nonoperating Revenues 126,090 96,704
Income Before Operating Transfers 230,226 148,463
Operating Transfers In (Out):
General Fund 18,550 22,736
Special Revenue Fund 30,000 15,000
Revenue Sharing Fund 45,000
Data Processing Fund (5,400)
Self Insurance Fund (20,890) (11,209)
Total Operating Transfers 27,660 66,127
Net Income 257,886 214,590
Retained Earnings - January 1 1,492,474 1,277,884
Retained Earnings - December 31 $1,750,360 $1,492,474
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-9
• CENTRAL GARAGE AND EQUIPMENT FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $257,886 $214,590
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation 291,770 256,921
Working Capital Provided by Operations 549,656 471,511
Contributed capital increased:
City 91,004
Disposition of equipment 21,588 1,500
Total Sources of Working Capital 662,248 473,011
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 310,485 304,,020
Property and equipment transferred from:
Municipal Golf Course Fund 35,739
General Fixed Assets 58,393
• Total Uses of Working Capital 404,617 304,020
Net Increase in Working Capital $2572631 $168,991
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital:
Cash and investments $231,021 $193,831
Accounts receivable 260 (1,002)
Due from other funds 140 (91)
Due from other governments 416
Inventory (391) 2,580
Accounts payable 26,933 (23,568)
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable (748) (3,850)
Due to other funds 1,025
Due to other governments 66
Net Increase in Working Capital $257,631 $168,991
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-10
I J
DATA PROCESSING FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $ 55,952 $ 90,162
Accounts receivable 9,705
Due from other funds:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield 945 945
Due from other governments 1,789
Inventory 3,628 1,483
Total Current Assets 72,019 92,590
n
LJ
Property and Equipment:
Building improvements 4,635 4,635
Office equipment 6,459 7,431
Machinery and equipment 448,288 479,060
Other improvements 2,556 2,733
461,938 493,859
Less accumulated depreciation 148,528 234,698
Net Property and Equipment 313,410 259,161
Total Assets $385,429 $351,751
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 9,080 $ 25,570
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 13,856 9,622
Total Current Liabilities 22,936 35,192
Fund Equity:
Contributions:
City 12,842 12,842
Retained earnings:
Unreserved 349.651 303.717
Total Fund Equity 362,493 316,559
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $385,429 $351,751
?/y //-.?1 3
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-11
• DATA PROCESSING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Operating Revenues:
Charges for services:
Equipment rental $125,224 $169,236
Professional services 120,743 117,431
Total Operating Revenues 245,967 286,667
Operating Expenses:
Cost of materials used:
Inventory - January 1 1,483 4,472
Purchases 2,853 7,284
Total 4,336 11,756
Inventory - December 31 (3,628) (1,483)
Total Cost of Materials 708 10,273
Other Operating Expenses: -
Salaries and wages 63,267 78,332
Retirement contributions 9,491 9,079
Health and life insurance contributions 4,319 4,148
Equipment rentals 15,790 97,520
Expert and professional services 30,948 29,587
Insurance and bonds 2,476 2,729
Contractual maintenance and repairs 27,730 12,449
General expenses 6,950 3,238
Supplies 5,333 2,360
Depreciation 80,536 47,592
Total Other Operating Expenses 246,840 287,034
Total Operating Expenses 247,548 297,307
Operating Income (Loss) (1,581) (10,640)
Nonoperating Revenues:
Interest 4,337 3,317
Insurance claims 41,655
Storm disaster aid 3,067
Total Nonoperating Revenues 49,059 3,317
Income (Loss) Before Operating Transfers 47,478 (7,323)
Operating Transfers In (Out):
General Fund 132,780
Enterprise Funds 143,100
Central Garage Fund 5,400
Self Insurance Fund (1,544) (1,007)
Total Operating Transfers (1,544) 280,273
Net Income 45,934 272,950
• Retained Earnings - January 1 303,717 30,767
Retained Earnings - December 31 $349,651 $303,717
?r.s 7
?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-12
DATA PROCESSING FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $ 45,934 $272,950
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation 80,536 47,592
Working Capital Provided by Operations 126,470 320,542
Total Sources of Working Capital 126,470 320,542
•
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 134,785 289,055
Total Uses of Working Capital 134,785 289,055
Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital $ (8,315) $ 31,487
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital:
Cash and investments $(34,210) $ 60,760
Accounts receivable 9,705
Due from Housing and Redevelopment Authority 472
Due from other governments 1,789
Inventory 2,145 (2,989)
Accounts payable 16,490 (24,831)
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable (4,234) (1,925)
Net Increase in Working Capital $ (8,315) $ 31,487
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-13
19 CENTRAL SERVICES FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash $32,708 $18,040
Accounts receivable 160 562
Due from other funds:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield 1,137 2,220
Due from other governments 1,246
Inventory 13,783 11,875
Total Current Assets 49,034 32,697
Property and Equipment:
Office equipment 125 130
Machinery and equipment 41,539 59,139
Other improvements 1,318 1,318
42,982 60,587
Less accumulated depreciation 29,173 31,027
Net Property and Equipment 13,809 29,560
Total Assets $62,843 $62,257
• LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 2,164 $ 2,146
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable 5,199 4,212
Capital lease obligation - current portion 7,241
Total Current Liabilities 7,363 13,599
Long-Term Liabilities:
Capital lease obligation 6,969
Fund Equity:
Contributions:
City 19,477 19,477
Retained earnings:
Unreserved 36.003 22.212
Total Fund-Equity 55,480 41,689
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $62,843 $62,257
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-14
CENTRAL SERVICES FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Operating Revenues:
Charges for services:
Printing services $ 21,482 $ 23,572
Labor services 5,441 8,177
Office services:
Office supplies 25,826 22,182
Copying services 43,296 47,232
Postage services 35,225 38,940
Total Operating Revenues 131,270 140,103
Operating Expenses:
Cost of materials:
Inventory - January 1 11,875 12,633
Purchases:
Office supplies 28,610 21,052
Copying services 6,178 5,303
Postage services 31,220 35,003
Total Materials Available for Resale 77,883 73,991
Less: Inventory - December 31 13,783 11,875
Total Cost of Materials 64,100 62,116
Other Operating Expenses:
Salaries 25,557 25,584
Retirement contributions 2,820 2,724
Health and life insurance contributions 1,925 1,831
Rents and leases 11,215 4,384
Insurance and bonds 901 1,100
Contractual maintenance and repairs 497 2,835
General.expenses 1,779 1,870
Supplies 1,880 1,749
Depreciation 9,633 12,163
Total Other Operating Expenses 56,207 54,240
Total Operating Expenses 120,307 116,356
Operating Income 10,963 23,747
Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses):
Interest 1,724
Storm disaster aid 2,136
Gain on sale of assets 832
Interest (716) (1,386)
Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 3,976 (1,386)
Income Before Operating Transfer 14,939 22,361
Operating Transfer (Out):
Self Insurance Fund (1,148) (699)
Net Income 13,791 21,662
Retained Earnings - January 1 22,212 550
Retained Earnings - December 31 $ 36,003 $ 22,212
.?1/-l-I
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-15
CENTRAL SERVICES FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income $13,791 $21,662
Item not requiring working capital:
Depreciation 9,633 12,163
Working Capital Provided by Operation 23,424 33,825
Increase in long-term liabilities 6,969
Deposition of equipment 10,183
Total Sources of Working Capital 33,607 40,794
Uses of Working Capital:
Acquisition of property and equipment 4,065 20,395
Decrease in long-term liabilities 6,969
Total Uses of Working Capital 11,034 20,395
Net Increase in Working Capital $222573 $20,399
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital:
Cash and investments $14,668 $26,328
Accounts receivable (402) 369
Due from other funds (1,083) 1,113
Due from other governments 1,246
Inventory 1,908 (758)
Accounts payable (18) 1,847
Accrued salaries and employee benefits payable (987) (1,259)
Capital lease obligation 7,241 (7,241)
Net Increase in Working Capital $22,573 $20,399
0
//--i?6
r"1
U
w
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-16
SELF INSURANCE FUND
COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1987 and 1986
ASSETS 1987 1986
Current Assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments $907,486 $769,776
Accounts receivable 3,872 4,859
Total Current Assets $9112358 $774,635
LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts and benefits payable $567,886 $529,391
Due to other governments:
State of Minnesota 456 1,524
City of St. Louis Park 1,000
Total Current Liabilities 568,342 531,915
Fund Equity:
Retained earnings:
016
343
720
242
Unreserved , ,
Total Retained Earnings and Fund Equity 343,016 242,720
Total Liabilities and Fund Equity $911,358 $7742635
*// JY
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-17
• SELF INSURANCE FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND
CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Operating Revenues:
Charges for services:
Employees' contribution $ 14,022 $ 11,661
South Hennepin Human Service Council 1,330 1,391
Total Operating Revenues 15,352 13,052
Operating Expenses:
Expert and professional services 15,238 32,573
Employee benefits, workers'compensation,
and other claims 274,987 677,424
Insurance and bonds 25,874 36,287
Total Operating Expenses 316,099 746,284
Total Operating Loss (300,747) (733,232)
Nonoperating Revenues:
Interest 55,329 58,213
•
Claims and refunds 51,515
Total Nonoperating Revenues 106,844 58,213
Loss Before Operating Transfers (193,903) (675,019)
Operating Transfers In:
General Fund 202,020 154,704
Liquor Fund 22,881 21,376
Water Utility Fund 22,644 16,422
Sewer Utility Fund 10,766 10,622
Golf Course Fund 11,906 8,453
Storm Sewer Utility Fund 400 210
Central Garage Equipment Fund 20,890 11,209
Data Processing Fund 1,544 1,007
Central Services Fund 1,148 699
Total Operating Transfers 294,199 224,702
Net Income (Loss) 100,296 (450,317)
Retained Earnings - January 1 242,720 693,037
Retained Earnings - December 31 $343,016 $ 242,720
0'
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA FORM L-18
SELF INSURANCE FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
For the Years Ended December 31, 1987 and 1986
1987 1986
Sources of Working Capital:
Operations:
Net income (loss) $100,296 $(450,317)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital 1002296 $(450,317)
Elements of Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital:
Cash and investments 137,710 $ 53,048
Accounts receivable (987) 2,339
Accounts and benefits payable (38,495) (523,919)
Due to other governments 2,068 16,715
Deposit 1,500
Net Increase (Decrease) in Working Capital $100,296 $(450,317)
•
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 99
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Award of Contract for the 1988 Sealcoating Project.
Background:
In 1979, the City of Richfield began a phased project of roadway
improvement by sealcoating all of the city's bituminous streets.
A thin coat of emulsified oil is applied, then covered with rock.
This process rejuvenates the surface of the street, and prevents
it from deteriorating. This is the ninth year of a Council-
directed ten year program.
The 1987 project area was slightly smaller than the 1988 project
area.
Allied Blacktop was the successful bidder for the 1987 project
with a bid price of $65,263.70.
On March 24, 1988 bids were opened from four contractors for the
1988 Sealcoating Project:
Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
• Allied Blacktop
Astech
D. A. Davis
$69,590.72
$73,310.92
$78,730.10
$96,954.80
A copy of the bid minutes and tabulation is attached for City
Council review.
Recommended Motion:
Award a contract to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. in the estimated
sum of $69,590.72 for the 1988 sealcoating project.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder.
2. The 1988 Street Division operating budget contains $95,000
for this project. The project includes staff time for crack
repairs and sweeping. Contractors bid on estimated
quantities, and costs will be monitored.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council may choose to reject all bids and direct staff
to obtain new bids. However, the four bidders include the top
contractors in this field and the prices for the work are
unlikely to be lowered enough to justify the cost of the
rebidding process.
• Discussion/Decision Mode:
Staff would like to schedule the work as soon as possible. The
bidding documents specify that the bidders may withdraw their
proposals after 60 days of the bid opening. The 60 days will be
up May 24, 1988.
Res e fully submitted,
Jam s D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP/eja
0
a
Q
z
0
Q
U
O
16-1
Q
O
U
J
Q
W
U)
m
0
vl sz
Ns1oNV1s
v17 xz
1' I x
VIOx
4161
M0113AQWn
BAY bVO30
4401
4111
41 $1
WLONINOGN
41 YI
14191
41 xl
41 11
41 01
lolll3
MOW
snann io-
XNVa
ONVI)IVC
JAY ONVIIN(k
416
411
NO1NIl:
O+f
OY1
SN3A311
1s
'BAY 13110311
1130SIV11
N1aOM1NSN
Aanami,
1NVSV3I
ONVNC
131adwH
01313bvc
'BAY 31VONAl
H31401V
1NVAaa
%V310o
1NOdn0
Nosa3N7
Lworlau
Oa4'alo
1a10ewnN
ONIAaI
s3wrr
XONX
NVOOI
NVOaON
NO1M3N
b3AIl0
BAY NN3d
"33n0
ll3SSna
NVOIa3NS
SVr10NL
NOIdo
1N33NIA
Nan6NSVM
BAY 63Xa3X
?N IN
Y E
Ql 2
g
u
z
A} ?
LL W z
O?0
auz
d
w
QC z
z
w
MO11330NO1 -
'BAY aV033
41 91
4l ll,
4401
.. .
NOlONI VA0016 . .
101113.
o0vol"O -
snewmW
Navd
ONVINVO -
3AV ONrllaOd
4#6 -
416
NOLN1l3
PA V,
..
Pox
SN3A31S
U1
'BAY 1311031N
1130s1V16 W
N1a0M1N3M
Aane6llid ?.
1NYMId
ONVaO
4316a VN
O1313aV11 V
'BAY 31WOMAI
N31a01V -
1NVA"
XV-4103 Q
LNOdno ,J
NOsa3N3
1110
3
N
ed
041vulo-
1010ewpN -
ONIAaI -
s3wVr ..
NVOOI -
Nroaon
NO1M3N
a3A110 _
'BAY NN34
N33n0
ll3SSna
NVOIb3NS - -
SVNONl -
NO.LdA
1N33NIA
Nanamsm
BAY S3Xa3X
N
o
n
?1 p N.
u
'a . N
70
r N
$ h
w N N N
^ r :fir
o
w r. 711
8
n
°
w b
w ill
A Y/
.° N d1
°
CITY OF RICHFIELD
? 0
Bid Opening
March 24, 1988
11:00 A.M.
1988 Sealcoating
Bid No. 88-4
Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the
Administrative Staff was called,by Steven Devich, Acting City
,Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to
receive, open and read aloud, bids for 1988 sealcoating, bid no.
88-4, as advertised in the official newspaper on March 9, 1988.
Present: Steven Devich, Acting City Clerk
Eileen Anderson, City Manager Representative
Art Bailey, Senior Engineering Technician
Bruce Palmborg, Housing & Redevelopment
Coordinator
The following bids were submitted and read aloud:
I VENDOR I BID I TOTAL I
I I SECURITY
I I I
I I
D.A.Davis Co. I 5% Bond I $96,954.00 I
I Sioux City, Nebraska
I ? I
i I I
I I
I
I Bituminous Roadways, Inc. I
I 5%
Bond I
I $69,590.72 I
Minneapolis I I I
I I
Allied Blacktop, Inc. I
I 5%
Bond I I
( $73,310.91 I
I Maple Grove
I l
I I I
I I
I Astech Corp. I
I 5%
Bond I
I $78,730.10 I
I St. Cloud, MN
I I
I I I
I I
The City Clerk announced that a bids would be tabulated and
considered at the April 11, 19 ity Coun '1 Me ing.
ev n Devich Ac ng City Cler
C?
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 98
Agenda, April 119 1988
Issue Statement:
A Resolution providing for the issuance and sale of $1,900,000 in
General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, Series 1988 A.
Background:
In December of 1985, the City of Richfield issued and sold a
$18,675,000 General Obligation Temporary Redevelopment Bond,
Series 1985. These bonds were sold to provide funds to
temporarily finance public redevelopment costs incurred in the
City's Interstate Lyndale Nicollet (ILN) redevelopment project
area, a tax increment financing district under Minnesota Statute.
The term of the temporary $18,675,000 bond issue is three years.
Thus, the bonds would mature on December 1, 1988. However, the
bonds are callable at each six-month interval during the three-
year term. The nearest call date for the bonds is June 1, 1988.
It is the recommendation of the Ci
temporary General Obligation Bonds
that the funding necessary for the
project costs, the discount on the
acquisition and other improvements
• sale. This sale is recommended to
refunding the temporary issue.
ty staff that the entire
be called on June 1, 1988 and
Hampton Inn Development
temporary bonds, land
be funded by a permanent bond
take place in conjunction with
The City is authorized by Minnesota Statute to issue and sell
long term bonds to permanently finance costs in the ILN project
area, as identified by the Redevelopment Plan for the area.
Pursuant to that authority, City staff recommends that the city
issue $1,900,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds to cover
the following identified as needing a permanent funding source:
Hampton Inn Development Project Costs - $ 681,000
Discount cost on Temporary Bonds - $ 168,000
Land Acquisition - $1,000,000
Cost of Issuance - $ 32,000
Discount - $ 19,000
TOTAL
$1,900,000
The term of this proposed $1,900,000 bond sale would be ten
years.
The $681,000 represents the total cost of city/public
improvements and land acquisition associated with the Hampton Inn
project. Thus, it is necessary to recoup these costs for the
city through a permanent bond process. Similarly, the $168,000
discount, which was associated with the $18,675,000 temporary
bond sale, is also a cost that the city must seek to recoup
through issuance of a permanent bond sale. The $1,000,000
included in the proposed bond sale would provide funding for land
• acquisition, public improvements, demolition, rehabilitation and
renovation of areas included in the ILN project area, in
accordance with the approved plan for the area.
In order to ensure that the city be in a position to act, to
assist or initiate further development in the ILN area, it is
essential that the city have available the $1,000,000 to provide
funding for such purposes. When opportunities present themselves
in the ILN area, it will be necessary that the city be in the
proper position to react.
It is also critical that properties now in the district remain in
the district so that the city may continue to make payments based
on the full ILN project area. In order to retain properties in
the district, some improvements in the entire ILN area will be
necessary. Thus, for that purpose also, it is essential that the
city have available funds to make necessary public improvements
in the course of the redevelopment plan.
Finally, it should also be noted that a pre-sale analysis on the
proposed bond sale will be presented at this evening's Council
Meeting by representatives from Evensen Dodge, the city's bond
consultant.
A review of the amortization schedule associated with the
proposed bonds indicates that the annual debt service of the
$1,900,000 bonds would be well within the city's annual tax
increment revenue from the ILN district as it is now constructed.
That means that even without appreciation of property or
additional development in the ILN, the tax increment portion of
the taxes in the project area would be sufficient to cover annual
bond amortization payments.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the attached Resolution approving the issuance and sale of
$1,900,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, Series 1988 A.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The city's 18,675,000 temporary redevelopment bonds are
subject to redemption and prepayment on June 1, 1988. It has
been recommended by the City Attorney that the bonds be
redeemed at that time.
2. The city has incurred expenses associated with the
development of the Hampton Inn project and discount costs on
the temporary bond sale, which needs to be addressed through
permanent financing.
3. With the redemption of the temporary bond sale, there is a
need for the $1,000,000 to provide for additional land
acquisition and redevelopment pursuant to the approved
plan for the ILN project area.
0
0
4. According to calculations executed by the city's
consultant, Evensen Dodge, it appears that the annual
amortization of the ten-year bond payments would fit
comfortably within the increment generated by the ILN project
area.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The City Council could elect to not approve the issuance of
$1,900,000 permanent bonds. However, that would leave the
city with a problem of finding funding for the $681,000
Hampton Inn improvements and to pay for discount and issuance
costs of the previous temporary bond sale. Such funds are
not available to the city without significantly decreasing
fund balances.
2. The City Council could authorize a bond sale of a differing
issuance size. However, it is the staff's recommendation
that the $1,900,000 level of funding be approved.
Decision/Discussion Mode:
In order for the city to sell the permanent bonds in time to make
the redemption and prepayment of the current temporary General
Obligation Bonds on June 1, 1988, it is necessary for the City
Council to approve authorization of the bond sale at the April
11, 1988 City Council meeting. This allows just enough time to
comply with publication requirements and consummate the bond sale
and receive the proceeds in time for the general redemption.
James D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP/sae
Respectf ly submitted,
-At ? ?_r "r
• Extract of Minutes of Meeting of the
City Council of the City of Richfield
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was duly held
in the City Hall in the City on Monday, April 11, 1988, commencing at 7:00
o'clock P.M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
•
The following resolution was presented by Councilmember
who moved its adoption, the reading of which was dispensed with by unani-
mous consent:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF $1,900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
REDEVELOPMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, (City) as follows:
1. It is hereby determined:
(a) The City has issued and sold its $18,675,000 General Obliga-
tion Temporary Redevelopment Bonds, Series 1985 (Temporary
• Bonds) to provide funds to temporarily finance public
redevelopment costs (Costs) incurred or to be incurred in
*9y
• the City's Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet Redevelopment Project
Area (Project Area). The Project Area is a Tax Increment
Financing District within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 469 (Act).
(b) The City is authorized by Section 469.178 of the Act to
issue and sell its long-term bonds to permanently finance
Costs in the Project Area as identified in the redevelopment
plan (Plan) for the Project Area.
(c) The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City (Author-
ity) has identified the following Costs to be permanently
financed:
Hampton Inn Development Project Costs $ 681,000
Discount on Temporary Bonds 168,000
Land Acquisition 1,000,000
Costs of Issuance 32,000
Discount 19,000
TOTAL $1,900,000
(d) The Authority has requested the City to issue and sell long
term bonds to finance all or a portion of the Costs.
(e) The Tax Increment Agreement between the Authority and the
City, dated December 2, 1985, and filed with the Director of
Property Taxation of Hennepin County is ratified and con-
firmed.
(f) That it is necessary and expedient to the sound financial
management of the affairs of the City to issue $1,900,000
General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, Series 1988A (Bonds)
to provide financing for the Redevelopment Costs.
• (g) The Temporary Bonds are subject to redemption and prepayment
on June 1, 1988.
2. In order to provide financing for the Costs, the City shall
therefore issue and sell Bonds in the amount of $1,881,000. In order to
provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at
this time, additional Bonds shall be issued in the amount of $19,000. Any
excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of.$1,881,000 shall
be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds for the purpose of
paying interest first coming due on such additional Bonds. The Bonds shall
be issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the following Official
Notice of Sale:
0
• OFFICIAL
NOTICE OF SALE
$1,900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
REDEVELOPMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A
CITY OF RICHFIELD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of the
above captioned bonds will be received until 1:00 p.m. C.T. on Monday,
April 25, 1988, in the office of the City Manager at City Hall, 6700
Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423, at which time the bids
will be opened and tabulated for consideration by the City Council at a
regular meeting at 7:00 p.m. C.T. on the same day. The bonds are offered
on the following terms.
Purpose and Security
The purpose of the bonds is to provide funds for the permanent
financing of public redevelopment costs in a redevelopment project area in
the City. The bonds will be general obligations to the City, for which its
full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged together with tax incre-
ments from the project area.
Date and Maturities
The bonds will be issued in fully registered form, will be dated
May 1, 1988, will be in integral multiples of $5,000 each and will mature
on February 1 in the following years and amounts:
Year Amount Year Amount
1989 $150,000 1994 $200,000
1990 150,000 1995 200,000
- 1991 150,000 1996 225,000
1992 175,000 1997 225,000
1993 175,000 1998 250,000
Redemption
The City may elect on February 1, 1996, or on any interest
payment date thereafter to redeem and prepay bonds of this issue in whole
or in part, in inverse order of maturities and by lot within maturities,
maturing on or after February 1, 1997, at a price of par plus accrued
interest to date of redemption.
Interest
Interest on the bonds will be payable on February 1, 1989, and
semiannually thereafter on each August 1 and February 1. All bonds matur-
ing on the same date must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a
single, uniform rate, and no rate for any maturity may exceed the rate
specified for any subsequent maturity by more than one percent. Each rate
must be in an integral multiple of 1/20 or 1/8 of 1%, and no rate of
interest nor the net effective average rate of the issue may exceed the
maximum rate of interest permitted by law on the day of sale.
0 Paying Agent
The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to
applicable SEC regulations. Principal will be payable at the principal
office of the Registrar and interest will be payable by check or draft of
the Registrar mailed to the registered holder of a bond. The City will pay
the reasonable and customary charges for the services of the Registrar.
CUSIP Numbers
The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing
of CUSIP numbers on the bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed
thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the
expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any extension of the time
of delivery caused thereby.
Delivery
Within 30 days after sale, the City will furnish and deliver to
the office of the purchaser or, at its option, will deposit with a bank in
the United States selected by it and approved by the City as its agent to
permit examination by and to deliver to the purchaser, the printed and
executed bonds, the unqualified opinion thereon of bond counsel, and a
certificate stating that no litigation in any manner questioning their
validity is then threatened or pending. The charge of the delivery agent
must be paid by the purchaser, but all other costs will be paid by the
City. The purchase price must be paid upon delivery of the bonds in funds
available for expenditure by the City on the day of payment.
Legal Opinion
An unqualified legal opinion on the bonds will be furnished by
LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz, a Professional Association,
Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion will be printed on the bonds at
the request of the purchaser. The legal opinion will state that the bonds
are valid and binding general obligations of the City and that the City is
obligated and required to levy taxes for the principal and interest thereon
as the same become due without limit as to rate or amount.
Type of Bid - Amount
Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be
received prior to the time established above for the opening of bids. Each
bid must be unconditional. A good faith deposit in the amount of $42,900
must be submitted with each bid prior to or immediately following bid
opening. The good faith deposit must be in the form of a certified or
cashier's check or bank draft payable to the City Finance Director or a
wire transfer of funds to the City's designated depository. Wiring in-
structions will be furnished on the day of sale prior to the time of award
and sale. The good faith deposit will be deducted from the purchase price
of the bonds at delivery. The good faith deposit will be retained by the
is City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to
comply therewith. The bid authorizing the lowest net interest cost (total
interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities less any c::.ah premium or
• plus any amount less than $1,900,000) will be deemed the most favorable.
No oral bid and no bid of less than $1,881,000 plus accrued interest on all
of the Bonds will be considered and the City reserves the right to reject
any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Thomas Ferber
City Clerk
Dated: April 12, 1988.
•
0
3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to advertise the Bonds
for sale in accordance with the foregoing Official Notice of Sale and to
cause the abbreviated notice of sale attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be
published in the manner required by law. The City Council shall meet at
7:00 p.m. on Monday, April 25, 1988, to consider bids on the Bonds and take
any other appropriate action.
4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take appropriate
action in consultation with bond counsel to call the Temporary Bonds for
redemption and prepayment on June 1, 1988.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Councilmember
and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor of the motion:
and the following voted against:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
•
n
t? y_ 9
L
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
CITY RICHFIELD )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of
the City of Richfield, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully
compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting
of the City Council of said City held on Monday, April 11, 1988 „ with the
original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, true and
correct copy thereof, insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale
of $1,900,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds, Series 1988A.
WITNESS My hand as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City
0 this day of , 1988.
City Clerk
City of Richfield, Minnesota _
(SEAL)
R4:00550488.RAU
•
NOTICE OF BOND SALE EXHIBIT A
$1,900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
REDEVELOPMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A
CITY OF'RICHFIELD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of the
above captioned bonds will be received until 1:00 p.m., C.T. on
Monday, April 25, 1988, in the office of the City Manager at City
Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423, at
which time the bids will be opened and tabulated for consideration by
the city council at a regular meeting at 7:00 p.m., C.T. on the same
day. The Bonds are offered on the following terms. The Bonds will be
dated May 1, 1988, will bear interest payable semiannually on each
February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 1988, and will mature
on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
Year Amount Year Amount
1989 $150,000 1994 $200,000
1990 150,000 1995 200,000
1991 150,000 1996 225,000
1992 175,000 1997 225,000
1993 175,000 1998 250,000
The City may elect on February 1, 1996 or on any interest payment date
thereafter to redeem and prepay bonds of this issue in whole or in
part, in inverse order of maturities and by lot within maturities,
maturing on or after February 1, 1997 at a price of par plus accrued
interest to date of redemption.
No rate of interest nor the net effective interest rate of the issue
may exceed the maximum rate permitted by law. Bidders must specify a
price of not less than $1,881,000 plus accrued interest. A legal
opinion on the Bonds will be furnished by LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy,
O'Brien & Drawz, a Professional Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The proceeds of the bonds will be used to permanently finance public
redevelopment costs related to a redevelopment project area in the
City.
Bidders should be aware that the Official Statement to be distributed
for the bonds may contain additional bidding terms and information
relative to the bonds. In the event of a variance between statements
in this Notice of Bond Sale and the Official Statement the provisions
of the latter shall be those with which to comply.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Thomas Ferber
City Clerk
Dated: April 12, 1988.
R4:00550488.RAU
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA,
Council Letter No. 97
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Public hearing on a conditional use permit for a car rental
business at 6405 Cedar Avenue.
Background:
Southdale Manor, Inc., property owner, and Mr. Eugene Jankowski,
manager of the Ugly Duckling Inc. have requested the city to
grant a conditional use permit to allow the operation of an
automobile rental business at 6405 Cedar Avenue.
Mr. Jankowski previously operated his rental car business with a
conditional use permit, at 6333 Cedar Avenue.
The property is located in a General Industrial I district which,
allows, under a conditional use permit, an auto rental business.
The existing structure meets all the setback requirements except
the rear yard setback which is 14 feet.
It came to the attention of the city staff in December of 1987
that the Ugly Duckling Rent-A-Car business had been moved and was
being operated at 6405 Cedar Avenue without the required
conditional use permit.
City staff has been unsuccessful in attempts to close the
operation until the necessary permits were obtained. Notice of
noncompliance procedure was initiated on December 29, 1987. On
January 22, 1988, Mr. Jankowski was given five days to initiate
compliance action. Nothing was accomplished and on February 5,
1988 a five-day notice to discontinue operations was sent.
A conditional use permit was applied for on February 29, 1988;
however, petitioner is currently operating without the necessary
permit.
Attached are the copies of correspondence regarding the subject
site.
Recommended Motion:
Deny the conditional use permit for the Ugly Duckling Rent-A-Car
business at 6405 Cedar Avenue.
Basis of Recommendation:
Following the Planning Commission meeting the applicant submitted
a revised site plan. Staff has reviewed the plan and found the
following as basis of recommendation:
1. The Planning Commission at their regular meeting on March 22,
16 1988 recommended unanimously (7 to 0) to deny the conditional
use permit for the Ugly Duckling Rent-A-Car at 6405 Cedar
Avenue.
2. The parking space distribution for the site is as follows:
Required Need Max. Available
a. Existing Retail Use
Color Time (2,566 sq. ft.) 13 3 3
b. Rent-A-Car Office Use 1 1 1
Storage Use (224 sq. ft.) 30 30 25
Total 44 34 29
The analysis is based on the applicants assertion that the
operation maintains a fleet of 30 cars.
3. The site plan indicates that the existing three curb cuts are
only 24 feet wide. The required minimum curb cut width in an
industrial district is 26 feet. The applicant does not
propose to bring the curb cut width into conformance with the
city requirement.
4. The city ordinance requires that the offstreet parking areas
be striped and have adequate site drainage. These issues
have not been dealt with by the petitioner. No drainage plan
has been submitted.
5. Sufficient screening and buffering has not been provided on
the site. The applicant does not propose to do any
. substantial improvements on the site to soften the appearance
of the parking area.
The outside storage of cars in the parking area without
adequate screening is very unsightly and is not consistent
with city ordinance requirements for parking areas. The
applicant has proposed a wooden fence at the southeast
quadrant of the site.
It is staff's opinion that the outside storage of cars would
require additional landscaping on 64th Street around the
parking area in order to make the site aesthetically
pleasing.
6. The existing signs are in violation of the city ordinance.
The signs indicate auto-repair service in addition to the
rent-a-car business. The applicant has not submitted a
request for an auto-repair business.
7. The Comprehensive Development Plan indicates that the site be
developed for mixed land use. The existing commercial/office
use including the car rental business is consistent with the
city's Comprehensive Development Plan.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council may wish to approve the conditional use permit
for the Tent-a-car business (Ugly Duckling Rent-A-Car) at 6405
Cedar Avenue with the following stipulations:
1. The operation be closed until the City Council takes action
on the proposal.
2. The building and fire code be met.
3. The offstreet parking area be improved according to the city
ordinances.
4. The drainage plan be submitted for approval by the City
Engineer.
5. The offstreet parking area be landscaped and screened
sufficiently. A detailed landscape plan with names of
species, types and locations be submitted for staff approval.
6. The signs meet city sign regulations.
7. The repairable (poor condition) cars may not be stored on the
site for more than 48 hours.
8.. All the stipulations be met prior to the occupancy permit.
Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for the City Council meeting of April 11,
1988.
Notice of the hearing was mailed to property owners within 350
feet of the site. A legal notice was also published in the
Richfield Sun Current.
Respectfully submitted,
C??
James D. Prosser
City Manager
• ; N - O ' ; m P U v
XERXES AVE -=-. - - _unc?-= .__?_-r•'^,? _ _?_
WASNBURN
VINCENT I^ ?•--l•-I =._ - -. `- ? ?.- '- ---
UPTON 1`_._?L__ - .. _?.-1 ?... ?.1??f .•_ -
THOMAS
SHERIDAN "I r1> --
RUSSELL
QUEEN
DINNER-
NEWTON
MORGAN,?.J
LOGAN?
KNOx
JAMES
IRVING
HUMBOLDT 1? v -??r--- _LAK€' - •?L.J ?? ?L_J?
GIRARD I I/(.? J?• !,. `???'
FREMcw
EMERSON
DUPONT
COLFAX
BRYANT
ALORiCH
IYNOALE AVE.
6ARilELD
HARRIET
GRAND
I ?? W
PLEASANT 19TH AVE S
PILLSBURY 1 r, 1 I
WENTWOfTH
BLAISDELL \ i I I I i? 1 ?a
N ICOLLET AVE. I i I --
IM 1 /
STEVENS
CEDAR AVE S
2 M ?
SN Q
a '~ FFTM 1
m ( ` T
lHroN
S to
PORTLAND AVE.
OAKLAND krr rf;I LONGFELLOW AVE S '` ^• UUL.
FI j
PARK dpi I- ' .•.: SS L
COLUMBUS I' I '•':'. }+.; r
CHICAGO ?` I IL .J •••
ELLIOT rIl I? "' {i z
12 to
13 to
. NJ MINGTON I 1 •:{•• O
is to
CEDAR AVE. ' _ _ -- _ --'
-- -- ----
LONOFEILOW
b• V P M `. Y N J ?, JCJ
of T y C ]? ??C- ]
Z;v
? now
2
0 i s 19 s Ys1 yst
_ H N N N y
A
0
N
q N
N =
XERXES AVE.
- WASNBURN
VINCENT
"TOR
d
?j THOMAS
SHERIDAN
RUSSELL
OUEEN
C? PENN AVE.
OLIVER
;NEWTON
MORGAN
LOGAN
::Ox
JAMES
^ki IRVING
J C HUMBOLDT
II
I? GIRARD
t FWASONT
EMERSON
I DUPONT
It
COLFAX
BRYANT
lll? •LORICN
LYNDALE AVE.
I
I;I GARFIELD
I HARRIET
GRAND
I
PLEASANT
11I PILLSBURY
II
lil WENTWORTH
I
BLAISDELL
I
NICOLLET AVE.
lot
STEVENS
and
SH
CLINTON
of 1N
SIN
PORTLAND AVE.
OAKLAND
PARK
COLUMBUS
II CHICAGO
ELLIOT
I) 10 to
O?? tl 1N
1 (21N
ISIN
14tH
IS to
BLOOMINGTON
Is to
IT/N
_ , IB 1A
CEDAR AVE.
L LONGFELLOW
IttN
20 tN
21 Nt
22 P.
STANDISH
23 N
N
?M
M
r
O
0
O
Z
Os
vt
n
rn
v
rn
rr?
R
A
l2s#4
. Y:5'
4/
GATE
C
• e
51
4 9
dft
i
h
;4
i `
3 fi
? ? _ * # !? ? 'Y lam- J
V ? ? N
d•
Yg+
RECOMMENDED
•
r
6405 CEDAR AVE S.
CEDAR AVE S
103.8
W
H
N
I--
tC
TREE
FENCE
SHRUBS 4N
S 3AV 1S1Z
rn r+
Ililllllil .•.: I I I l ? 1 (
1,1,1,1,1, ;, ;• m I ? i
I I
I III 1 • _ ._ i..1 ?.._? L_: .
,I?I?I i t I 1 ? I ; l
1',1,',111
S 3AY ONZZ
J
10 10 -0
I
.III ? 1•
S 3Ad HS ?'Jt?d 1S
II
S 3Ae oa?.Z
10
Al
-- ( I I
I I ?-
i I I1
LL ill
v
v r
r rO
rn
D
r
wr"
I 1 I •::
tltttlt •.
flit ...
r4 m m
I'm
IT! m
A A
rn rn
N ??
U
J
D
0
Q
Ll.
z
U
Im
1
Q ,a
W
iIII?
J
a
U
CC
W
z
W
X
O
U W
a
Q o N
O MEN
O
? I 1 ? I I
1
T t -,-TT-
W
23RD
i
1 I I al
i
STANDISH
it {
22ND
?-?
L
,
2 t
?
21ST
AVE S
W
r
AVE S
1
i
AVE S
N AVE s
S
tD
AVE s
I
I
AVE s
I I I? I I
I I I I I I I I
! ? I I
S
20 TH
19 TH
AVE s
S and H191
I
/S and H1L1
W
U
Q
S
J
L
7
J
J
Q
Z
0
M
I~•-
Z
Z
w
CL
0
.0
Z
Q
Y
a
t?
gi
w
LL
m
J ?Z
w
n °
z
.U
1
J
W
2
W
Cf)
M
Z
c
x_
El
El i
W
LID
-V
ST AIIG i SH AVE S
i i+ l l! II
-
oil]
t 1 _ I_ ) 1? I I I
a?
22ND AVE S
1 ' ' I I 1
_ T"I
l,t I
• A ?
,.
Nil
W )
2157 1.- AVE S
I
' t I' I N'f fil
S
20TH AVE S
I ? i I I I.
I
'illt
19TH AVE S
f
+ ( I i I
AVE S
13
?¦
on
y-
0
?F+
,V
•
M
CM
Ln
L0
aw
O
¦
¦
L
O
a
O
March 7, 1988
Mr. Eugene Jankowski
Ugly Duckling Rent-A-Car
6405 Cedar Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Re: Your letter of March 1st, 1988 which I received
on March 2nd, 1988.
Dear Mr. Jankowski,
I am not authorized to give you any temporary permits
to operate your business prior to council approval.
The sign must be removed and the operation must cease
forthwith.
Yours truly,
Sivert Hendrickson
Building Official
SH/lkt
cc: ". T. Kazi
telephone: 869-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
A
e1
PPE6nj
UGLY-DUCKLING
RENT-A-CAR Inc.
of Minneapolis & St. Paul
UGLY DUCKLING
Rent-A-Car
6405 Cedar Ave. S., Mpis., MN 55423
(612) 861-7545
February 1, 1988
Mr. Towhid Kazi
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Mr. Kazi
This letter is in reply to your letter of January 22, 1988 regarding
Ugly Duckling Rent-A-Car not obtaining an off-street parking permit.
We have already applied for a permit to operate an autcmobile rental
business with off-street parking. Also, we will have the necessary
drawings that you requested by February 5, 1988. Furthermore, it is
our full intent to caply with the City of Richfield as soon as we
can.
Should you have.any questions regarding this letter, please contact
me at 861-7545.
f
W/dgj
r
•
February 8, 1988
M
M N
'Ct'
LA
LA
0
4)
c
OC
U E
L 3
C
d
O ?
C
t0
L
0
U o
•
Mr. Eugene Jankowski, Manager
Ugly-Duckling Rent-A-Car, Inc.
6405 Cedar Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Mr. Jankowski:
This letter is in response to your letter dated
2/1/88 regarding your non-compliance with the City
of Richfield Zoning Code. Your application for
Conditional Use Permit is not complete, therefore,
is unacceptable. You must also note that you have
missed a number of application deadlines for
Conditional Use Permit.
Should you decide to operate your business at the
above mentioned location, a Conditional Use Permit -
must be obtained prior to such operation. March
22nd would be the earliest Planning Commission
meeting this item could be placed on if a completed
application is received by February 29, 1988.
Should you have any questions, call me at 869-7521,
extension 512.
Sincerely,
To ?]id ?KaActing City Planner
cc: Byron Wallace
Sivert Hendrickson
TK/dkh
telephone: 869-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
??zl
N
L
U
W L
411111111111
0
U
•
M
Wt
¦
L
February 5, 1988
Mr. Eugene Jankowski
Ugly Duckling Car Rental
6401-05 Cedar Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE
Dear Mr. Jankowski,
On December 29, 1987, I sent you a letter indicating your
need for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an automobile
rental business at the above address. You were advised to
discontinue the use and remove the illegal signs. This has
not been done as of this date.
If the signs have not been removed and the illegal use
discontinued within five (5) days of receipt of this Notice
of Non-Compliance, citations will be issued.
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please
contact me at 866-5061, X 370.
Yours truly,
Sivert Hendrickson
Building Official
SH/lkt
cc: Towhid
telephone: 869-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
!V
tf'
N
tf
f+
O
N
c
U E
L ?
C
d
ea
0 ?
c
ea
O
a
•? O
O
ti
•
January 22, 1988
Mr. Eugene Jankowski, Manager
Ugly Duckling Car Rental
6405 Cedar Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Mr. Jankowski,
This letter is a follow-up of our conversation on
January 14, 1988 regarding the Notice of Non-
Compliance with Richfield City Code, (dated December
29, 1987 from Sivert Hendrickson), which requires
that you obtain a conditional use permit with an
off-street parking permit prior to operating an
automobile rental business on given premises.
You have indicated that a conditional use permit
would be submitted before January 22nd, which was
the deadline for the Planning Commission meeting on
February 16, 1988. The next Planning Commission
meeting is scheduled for March 22nd and the deadline
for application is February 29th. However, in order
to avoid any citation for Non-Compliance of the City
Code, you are asked to submit a letter of intent
regarding compliance within a reasonable time frame
by January 27, 1988. The city will then take
appropriate action on the subject.
Should you have any questions regarding the contents
of this letter, please contact me at 869-7521,
extension 512. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Towhid Kazi
Acting City Planner
cc: Sivert Hendrickson
TK/dkh
telephone: 669-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
N
LO
0
0
?
U E
. 0
14m >
cc
0
cc
L
•
December 29, 1987
Manager
Ugly Duckling Car Rental
6401 Cedar Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Manager,
This letter is a Notice of Non-Compliance with Richfield
City Code which requires a special use permit prior to
operating an automobile rental business on given premises.
Although you.had a special use permit to operate at
6333 Cedar Avenue, it does not extend to the property
where you are now located. The signs you have erected
are in violation of city ordinance and must be removed.
It will be necessary for you to discontinue the use and
"to make application for a special use permit for your
proposed use. Applications must be made to our Community
Development Department and your petition will be considered
by the'City Planning Commission and City Council. An
off-street parking contract is also required to be included
in the "special use permit approval process.
If you have any questions pertaining to an application,
please contact Towhid Kazi, Asst. City Planner at 869-7521,
Ext. 512-or myself.
Yours truly,
Sivert Hendrickson
Building Official
r-c: T. Kazi
SH/lkt
toleophono: $69-7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
??F'---]' I Cofo'. e #ecia t t'F- . _qne.
6405 CEDAR AVE. SO.
612/861-1555 RICHFIELD, MN 55423
March 30, 1988
Planning Commission
City of Richfield
5700 Portland Avenue
Richfield MN 55423
Dear Sirs:
This letter is to inform you as to the use Color Specialties
Inc. makes of the property at 5405 Cedar Avenue South. Our
business is all done by phone order or mail order. The orders
come in and are filled by a part time person who works from
one to three hours per day. A secretary does all the other
necessary tasks here. UPS picks up all the orders being
shipped once each day.
My secretary, parks her car here all day. The part time
. worker uses a bicycle in good weather, and a pick up the rest
of the year. The company has no local customers and has no
walk in, or drive in trade. In the past 12 years the company
has never needed any more personnel than that described above.
I, as the owner, spend from one to three hours a day at the
office. We therefore, never park more than two vehicles
here at any time.
I feel that the Ugly Duckling management runs a good clean
business and is an asset to this community. They always
strive to keep the area clean and in good order.
Cordially yours,
COLOR SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED
Harold 0. Toupin
President
cc: Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, LTD
Attorney
0
r?
•
March 14, 1988
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423
To: Richfield City Planning Commission
In response to the public hearing notice for granting a conditional use permit
for Ugly-Duckling Runt-a-Car, Inc, located at 6405 Cedar Avenue South.
I own the building across the street at 6345 Cedar and operate Arbor Construction
and Lawnmasters Landscaping Inc. from that sight. My concern with a rental car
company would be the number of cars attempted to handle in such a limited space.
We need on street parking on our side of 64th for our business purposes.
If they are granted a conditional use permit, I feel strongly that they should
not be allowed to have more vehichles than their parking lot can handle.
My other concern would be the quality of the vehicles he has parked on his
lot or on the street. I feel it would be important that all vehicles be in
operating condition.
Thank you very much.
Randy J. Johnson
C.E.O.
Arbor Construction
1]
?,7
DESCRIPTION OF FENCE:
The fence will consist of V'xV x6' treated pinewood boards
fastened to the exsisting chain link fence. This will be
put up in 91x6' sections. Also, the fence will be painted
the same color as the adjacent building.
u
Z G AP.1
G
0'/
•
I X1 I I I
9'x6' section
hl??
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 96
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Public Hearing to Establish a Special Assessment District and
Order the Undertaking of Current Maintenance Service Projects in
the Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment Project Area.
Background:
The extensive landscaping in the ILN East Side area calls for
planting trees, shrubs and sod; installation of an irrigation
system and sidewalk installation.
Once the contractor's responsibility ends, the city becomes
responsible for the maintenance of this improvement.
History
The ILN Advisory Committee chaired by Gertrude Ulrich, the
Residential Advisory Committee chaired by Marv Kaiser, the
Planning Commission, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and
the City Council have been apprised of the need for special
assessments to fund maintenance on numerous occasions since 1985.
The attached September 11, 1987 memo from Bruce Palmborg
documents the contacts with the various groups.
• City staff believes that the special assessments mechanism is the
best method of funding the maintenance.
Boundaries
The attached map shows the boundary options for the new special
assessment district.
Staff recommends the area bounded by 77th Street on the north,
Pleasant Avenue on the east, 78th Street on the south and Lyndale
Avenue on the west, plus the Vickers property be assessed for
maintenance of the newly completed street/landscape project.
The attached proposed special assessment roll identifies the
properties to be assessed and the assessment amounts.
As public improvements are completed, the boundaries will widen
as needed.
All single family and two family residential property will be
exempt from the special assessment levy. The rationale for the
exemption is that generally, there are negative impacts from
businesses located close to residential properties and the
landscaping buffer insulates the residential property from these
negative impacts.
Commercial property will be assessed on a per-square-foot basis
under the proposed plan.
The special assessments will pay for maintenance to the
landscaped areas along the screenwall and other common areas.
Level of Service
Different landscaped areas around Richfield display different
levels of service. The "look" of the greenspace between the curb
and noise walls along our freeways is different from manicured
ballfields at Taft Park. The front lawn of a typical Richfield
residence, the landscaped entrance to Naegele's, and the wide
open picnic areas of Augsburg Park provide different ideas of
maintained landscaped areas.
Staff has identified two service levels and associated costs:
-The estimated cost for providing the same service level as
in the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) is about $7,000 per year.
An estimate from a private landscaping contractor for
providing a level of service similar to that provided for
the landscaping of a corporate headquarters was $3,200 plus
$22/hour for weeding and other extras.
Irrigation repair and city administration costs could bring
costs to near $6,000.
The LHN area sees heavy pedestrian traffic, cars and buses.
. The landscaping areas abut storefronts. These areas seem
to attract vandalism as well as complaints when not in top
shape.
A corporate headquarters may have a high standard, but it
may not see the abuse of a public area. Although our 77th
Street buffer may not see the pedestrian traffic, and with
it the vandalism and complaints, it does abut single family
homes.
Arriving at a proper service level will require some trial
and error over the next year or two.
Contract Labor
Each of the businesses affected by the proposed special
assessment has been contacted by staff members.
A general consensus among the owners seems to be that they would
prefer a private landscaping company perform the maintenance
rather than city crews.
State statute and City ordinance allows this type of work to be
performed by contract labor or by city crews (day labor).
The public hearing will provide an opportunity for the businesses
• to voice their preference on this issue.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the attached resolutions establishing a special assessment
district and order the undertaking of current maintenance
services in the district.
It is understood that:
1. The boundaries of the ILN special assessment district are
identified on the attached map.
2. The level of maintenance service in the ILN will be similar
to that provided in the LHN.
3. Richfield will contract for as much of the maintenance
service in the ILN as practical.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The use of maintenance assessments has been included as part
of the funding package during discussions of the formation of
the ILN redevelopment project.
2. Some extraordinary maintenance is needed to keep the
landscape area attractive.
3. Council is authorized by City ordinance to establish
districts for the purpose of levying special assessments for
current maintenance services projects.
Alternative Recommendation:
The Council can adjust the assessment boundaries, modify the
level of service, and/or order the work to be done by day labor
rather than private contract service. However, staff believes
that the recommended special assessment project will deliver the
expected and needed services at a reasonable cost.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is on the April 11, 1988 City Council meeting agenda.
As the maintenance season is beginning now, council is asked to
make a decision regarding the special assessment project soon.
Respectfu y submitted,
Jame D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP/eja
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DETERMINING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE
COSTS OF CURRENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN
THE INTERSTATE/LYNDALE/NICOLLET PROJECT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows:
1. The portion of the Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet Redevelopment Project
Area (the "District") east of Lyndale and south of 77th Street plus that
property identified as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-
24-33-0073, west of the railroad tracks and north of the frontage road is
hereby established as a special assessment district for the purposes of
assessing for current services provided by the city.
2. The following current services of the city are hereby proposed to be
undertaken by the city in the District with the cost of such services to be
specially assessed against benefited property within the District:
The trimming and care of trees and shrubs and the removal of unsound
trees from any street;
The repair of sidewalks;
The maintenance of landscaped areas, irrigation systems and
other public amenities on or adjacent to street rights-of-way;
Trash and litter removal.
3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such current services
consists of each and every commercial and multiple residential lot and parcel
of land within the District. It is proposed that the special assessments on
the commercial property be made on the basis of area, with each square foot of
assessable commercial property within the District assessed an equal amount.
4. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the aforementioned
services for the period from January 1, 1988 through December 31, 1988. The
estimated cost of providing all of the aforementioned current services during
that period is $7,000.
5. It is hereby determined that interim financing of said assessed
current services will be provided through the permanent General Obligation
Bonds of 1988.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 11th day of
April, 1988.
Steven J. Quam, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
77
RESOLUTION NO._
RESOLUTION ORDERING UNDERTAKING OF CURRENT
SERVICE PROJECTS
• WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance the City council of the City of Richfield
did on April 11, 1988, establish a special assessment district and did propose
that certain current services be undertaken by the City and that the cost of
such services be specially assessed against benefited property, and
WHEREAS, the City Council did also by resolution on March 14, 1988 set
the date for public hearing on the undertaking of such current service
projects and the levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof; and
WHEREAS, following due notice, such public hearing was held on April 11,
1988, at which time all interested parties desiring to be heard were given an
opportunity to be heard.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the following current services of the City shall be undertaken
by the City within that portion of the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet
Redevelopment Project Area east of Lyndale and south of 77th Street including
that parcel known as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-24-
33-0073, west of the railroad tracks and north of the frontage road, which
area shall constitute the special assessment district, with the cost of such
services to be specially assessed against benefited property within the
District:
The trimming and care of trees and shrubs and the removal of
unsound trees from any street;
The repair of sidewalks;
The maintenance of landscaped areas, irrigation systems, and
other public amenities on or adjacent to street rights-of-way;
Trash and litter removal.
2. The work to be performed may be by day labor, city force, by
contract, or by any combination thereof.
3. The designated period of the project shall be from January 1, 1988
through December 31, 1988. Costs of the project shall be collected in the
manner provided in Richfield Ordinance Code Sections 12.29, 12.30 and 12.31.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 11th day of
April, 1988.
Steven J. Quam, Mayor
0 ATTEST:
Tom Ferber, City Clerk
•-
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Inter-Office Memorandum
w
16
DATE: September 11, 1987
TO:' Mike Rastling
FROM: Bruce Palmborg
SUBJECT: ILN Special Assessment Discussions/Reports
A review of the files has revealed that use of special
assessments to pay for the maintenance of the public improvements
in the ILN has been discussed and reported on'many occasions.
Documents/Reports
1), "Report on Financing Alternatives Study for Proposed Project
Improvements and Development", ILN, dated September 16, 1985.
Pages 3 and 4 contain a recommendation that special
assessments be utilized for maintenance of public
improvements. (Copy is attached).
2) "ILN Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plan, October
21, 1985 Page 41 discusses the use of special assessments
for maintenance of public improvements. (Copy is attached)
3) "ILN Redevelopment Study, November, 1985", prepared by BRW.
A section of this report discusses project financing and on
page 83 specifically mentions special assessments for
maintenance of public improvements. (.Copy is attached)
4) "ILN Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plan, October
21, 1985, amended December 15, 1986". Similar to No-2 above,
but modified to reflect CDR's downscaled project. Page 41
again discussed the use of special assessments for
maintenance of public improvements. (Copy is attached)
5) "Award of Contract for Landscaping Screenwall, Sidewalk and
Appurtenant .Work in the ILN Redevelopment Area", City Council
letter number 263 from the August 24, 1987 meeting. Page 2
of this letter discussed.the need for a special assessment
district for maintenance of public improvements. (Copy is
attached)
t°!
•
This was the official "coming out" of the ILN concept plan and
redevelopment plan. The meeting minutes indicate that in
addition to the HRA, the City council and Planning Commission
members were in attendance. The minutes also state that
Executive Director/City Manager Cartwright reviewed HRA Letter
No. 48 which was the report on financing alternatives. Special
assessments were specifically discussed. The redevelopment and
tax increment plan dated October 21 was also presented and was
referred to the Planning Commission.
Meetings of Policy Makers
September 16, 1985, HRA Meeting
October 81 1985, Planning Commission Special Meeting
The PC reviewed and approved the redevelopment and tax increment
plan dated October 21, 1985. In the official letter to the PC,
the financing alternatives memo presented at the September 16 HRA
meeting was noted. The minutes don't indicate whether or not
there was another discussion of special assessments.
October 21, 1985, HRA Meeting
The October 21,.redevelopment and tax increment plan was before
the HRA for formal approval. The official letter on this item
referenced the financing alternative report on September 16th.
November 12, 1985, City Council Meeting
The City Council approved the redevelopment and tax increment
financing plan dated October, 21, 1985,' Council letter'No. 8
dealt with this item. One of the attachments to the letter was
the financing alternatives report previously presented September
16th.
November 17, 1986, HRA Meeting
The HRA referred the amended December 15, 1986 redevelopment and
tax increment plan to the Planning Commission.
November 25, 1986, Planning Commission Meeting
Fhe Planning Commission made the appropriate findings and
approved the amended plan.
December,15, 1986, HRA Meeting
i i
The HRA approved the amended plan dated December 15, 1986 (this
. plan was not presented to the Council as CDR withdrew their
proposa.11.
Ci_tizein Committee Meetings
40?
There were two committees which worked with the ILN Plan. The
. Advisory Committee (AC) chaired by Gertrude Ulrich was composed
of about two dozen members, both business people and residents.
This group met from early spring through late summer of 1985 and
again during the fall of 1986. The -second group w4s the
Residential Advisory Committee (RAC) chaired by Marv Kaiser.
RAC met in the fall of 1986. A review of notes and meeting
minutes indicates that project financing was discussed with both
of these groups including special assessments. The minutes don't
provide sufficient detail to permit documentation of the extent
of the remarks.
On June 10, 1987, there was a meeting to review the details of
the PIEL plan. Residents, property owners and business people
south of 76th Street to 78th Street and east of Lyndale jo
Pleasant were invited. No business people from that area were at
the meeting. Thus, the special assessment process received very
little attention.
• Other Remarks i
The BRW redevelopment study report listed.under the document
section of this memo was widely distributed. It went to members
of the City Council, HRA, Planning Commission, committee members
and others.
w?,
•
•
-3-
#y f?
force in developing the conclusions and recommendations. The
third and final section provides background information an the
thirteen financing options which were considered
Staff Financing Conclusions and Recommendations
The report examines the following thirteen financial
options:
Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG)
Federal Aid to Urban Systems (FADS)
HRA Capital Fund
* MN Dept. of Transportation (MNDQT) Special Appropriation
Municipal State Aid Funds (MSA)
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR)
Proceeds From the Sale pf Land
Revenue Sharing
e Special Assessment (Bonds)
Special City Parking District
Special Revenue Fund
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
.Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG)
e Financing alternatives that have been identified as
possible financing resources for the ILN project.
After extensive consideration of the 13 financing options
available to the City for the ILN project area, the following
conclusions and recommendations are made:
1)
The use of Special Assessment Bonds are a source
of revenue for funding a portion of the
improvements in the ILN project area. A special
assessment of $.51 per square foot (identical zo LHN
special assessment) in the ILN area would
generate.
1.2 million, depending on what areas might be exempted.
In turn, a $5-6 million bond issue would have
based on this $1-1.2 million (20$) assessment,-if ba golc
source for the remaining 80% of the bond can be
identified.. The remaining 80% could be funded through
Tax Increment Financing proceeds. The public
improvements undertaken.in the nearly completed L/H/N
area are funded from CP 705. Revenues far t% 705
totaled about $g million. Two-thirds, or $6 million
was provided by'a bond issue. Special assessments
against the benefitting properties in the project area
accounted for repaying about 28% of the $6 million
issue. The remaining 72% of the debt service is
attired by tax.increments from,the project area.
As the HRA may be aware, when the city negotiated to
purchase properties in the L/H/N for redevelopment,
the purchase agreement often provided that the City
0
•
1 ytdb i u\/ 1 L I 1 u, o
* 9
of Richfield would also pay the outstanding arises-
menu on the property being acquired. $o, ome
properties, in effect, did not pay an _assessment.
The assessment rate for the L/H/N public Improve-
ments was $.51 per square foot. Due to inflation
the higher cost of constructing streets, curbs,
gutters, etc. ....'the equivalent assesamentrat#
today could be in the neighborhood of $.75 per
square foot when.compared to the $.51 square foot
rate establiahed in the 1970'3 for the L/H/N
project.
In order to establish a special assessment project,
a minimum of 20% of the project cost must be .
•aasessed to the benefitting property. The remaining
80% can be provided from other revenue sources.
The city must be able to establish that properties
benefit by at least the amount being assessed against
the private property,.
C?
C?
The preliminary cost estimate from BRW for public
improvements is just under $7 Million dollars.'
Twenty percent of $7 million is $1.4 million. I
Approximately $1.5 million could be provided by' a
bond issue supported by a $.75 square foot assess-
ment in the ILN project area. i
l Special assessments are also used to pay for maintenance
l of the L/H/N landscape improvements.
in the L/H/N objected to the-1-40-per The businesses
proposed assessment Ifor a city blk square foot
assessment today runs less than 1¢ $3,000). The
' to pay the annual cost of the $40000 $4455,0r_s ,000foot
mainte.hance bill.
One final note on special assessments. Staff believes
that some special assessment financing should be
utilized. The L/H/N has been financed in part this
way. In fairness, the I/L/N and future redevelopment
projects should be treated similarly, Special
assessment financing will help to keep the TIF bond
ii3 Sue smaller zo it can be paid off sooner.
It is also recommended that special assesment financing
be utilized to maintain the project
once completed (i.e, ? Public improvements'
, snow removal, grass cutring,
,repairs to streetzeape),.
2) A redevelopment project area and a Tax Increment
Financing district should be established for the
I/L/N. The increment generated by the pro owed
CDR Investments/MN Project (to be locatedon the
Cloverleaf Motel property.within the ILN) and the
<in
10/21/85 Pldn
M?
RELOCATION PROGRAM I
All relocation activities of the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet Redevelopment
Projlct would to in conformance :with t re Uniform Relocation Act (M.?,.
117.50-60).
MAINTENANCE OF THE PROJECT AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Projects such as the landscaped b.iffer along 77th Street and the stceetscaPe
adjacent to Lyndale Avenue nortn of 77th Street would require. extraordinary
maintenance alcove the level provided for. other areas of the city; Thus,
aaditional funding sources would Le identified to provide this maintenance.
A special assessment maintenance district encompassing t;1is area seems the most
appropriate for raising the necessary revenue. Otiva.-r forms of funding would
also to evaluated.
I
41
4.4
III
11 1 / 1
T -
-r a ?
a- -•• - ?- r N-
a o •c w •-i
N
=r -i
a a
a
b
m r a w a ?,..
CO to% -
X
(D
c a m
(D
?
m
x Gt
O
x
0 0 a a _. p 0 9 o
' p r Q b
j ; -1 a
(D 0- a N a i.
o
v -w
(D
- W 0
'0 CD p °
a in ?„ '
(D m
C) ny
O 8 +? j
(D N .} p _,
O ° a?
=
Q 3
A C - N b
N a -
'D T N
i
p
:
?
.V A 1
f
a ? U ?
r
1
?
N 4 -f
oD
Z)
?
D 0 0
o
?
(D - 0 o o < 0 3 a a ? 0 a
.
z Z
p C or -+
4 a
(D (D (D ;
, . f =)
(D ,
0 ?
N m m Q W -h
-r
(p
O b a Y O C . Sul 7 C .
Q#
0)
Q (A Q6
9D
CA. 0 -Jr P
-lb
Q
C: n
(
0)
N a
va a
1
a .... -,. m
(p
-1 - m
? a
ID -
itoor-0 ? : a u
i W-+ W..
N (D n a
oa
=r W
-1 0 10 '(D . _
:3
jD O - (D
E3 0. 7
o
-+
m=
. CD
a -1
(G (D
O 1 O
m N
- Q60
Q6 ; ID 0
N N a c
_ b z O N< [1 It O O IA r
4 -? Q. b
' .?
c
-+ (D y
n 4A
Z 0
-0 -7 I o v <
- c n o p ^ (G O X -1 40
p x. o O
w CD 10 -
i•
0 0 (D
*
C
(D -+O O
0 -?
cr d s a O 14
O
•
C
Q
CD
I
a
' T
0
GO `D m'
*• m "' a Q
g
a oa om
-4 0 a, AE .
r
9 0- r =r
-
00 37 (D
CD . IA
0
_.O W
x v Q
-1
b
3 O 0
- .?
(D 4 a- C 1 "? ?+
ZI 0%
O
3 C
Z (AA
O b 4
:r
0+ to p ^
T
.C (D (G Q O
0 r 00 11 (D _
z -
c O
? '1
CD CD CD
-F
-1
m
Q.
C?
G1
.
11 2 -+ CA O
O -1
in 0
T ul
-. y A
N W (D aIn < Q3 -
Q1 (D rn _.c -* Q Q. m
a)
u =r In
?o
m
.+ n ?.m a
4D Q. (
Q
1 O.
p -a
n C
0 y a - ?.a
m N ?w
C ('
ur
O
is
:r 0)
0
=r
a 9
•
N
W a 0 CD
C?
m
t ,j'+ (D « O<Q 0
,
N
' (D
•T O
4
C -% O CD
a
'D W
rt a ;a
•
CD 3 C CD CD 3
- N - Q n
? (Z
01 01 06 W Mr
(D N
a n A DI N -i (D
A Qy, O (D b - 1
a (D .; - ? y
m
O m ID W ...
cr - T -
h 1 a
-0 m n 0 W cr ? Q
O
(p
t
?
a
- ND
fD
OO N
X' Q 1
v
n
o
0
, ac < 4
m y vi _
O
b 1 N
0
a
• a
c7b
o
W -+ n
W O a ?
A a N -1 a
-1 a
-
- a
a O
m " h C? O N
T
Q '+ {
0
C
-t {D T^.
O0
1
1
-t-+m
-? j (D
;
_.
x
O `< °i
•c O w C y
0 0 0 n
-« z i ID
•
b4
Ci7Y OF R1CHflELU, MINNESOTA
/J Council Letter NO. 263
Agenda August'24, 1987
Issue Statement:
Award of Contract for Landscaping, Scr.eenwall, Sidewalk and
Appurtenant Work in the ILN Redevelopment Area, City Project
Number 8372.
Background:
On Friday, August 14, 1987, bids were received from four
contractors in a formal bidding process. The bid 'minutes and
tabulation are attached for council review. Submittals included
a base.bid and four alternates: 1) a deduct for using smaller
sized street trees and Black Hills Spruce, 2) a deduct for
reducing the height of the timber wall by 24, 3) a deduct to
substitute Techny Arborvitae shrubs for Miss Kim Lilac shrubs and`
4) an add for a second coat of stain on all exposed wood surfaces
including timber wall and bollards. These plans were.prepared by
BRW, Inc. and are consistent with the Stage 1 Plan,
The plans were subjected to extensive review. This is the model
for a landscape buffer which is contemplated for the west side of
Lyndale Avenue adjacent to 77th Street in the future. Everyone
is anxious for*it to work well. Residents and business people
east of Lyndale Avenue and south of 76th Street were invited to a
meeting on June 10, 1987 at Emerson Avenue Congregational Church.
However, no business people were in attendance. The plan
received :support from those at the,meetin Two
had specific concerns which have been successfullyraddert ressed..
The occupants of 7638 Garfield Avenue have a greenhouse on the
• south side of their property. The•privacy of this space will be
protected by a row of evergreens adjacent to their property.
Also, the property at 7645 Harriet Avenue would be subjected to
the intrusion of headlights from vehicular traffic traveling east
on the loop street. The loop street connects Garfield and
Harriet Avenues. Evergreens will be planted in the front of this
property to minimize the impact of these lights.
The plan was also reviewed by representatives of all.departments.
That is, representatives of Public Safety, Community Services, as
well as Administrative Services and Community Development. The
Community Services Department did not concur with the types of
plants selected because of the high cost to maintain areas
landscaped with small shrubbery. Consideration was given in the
design to safety issues, vehicular as well as pedestrian. Also,
the experience with plant materials in the LHN was of value.
Defining the details of the landscape plan was a difficult task,
aesthetics must be balanced against maintenance.
the issue is the need to provide an attractive landOn one
scapedSare of
which would also make-the screen or soundwall more acceptable.
The other side of the issue is the need to maintain the
plantings. The Community Services Department, which will
maintain the area, continues to assert that there are too many
shrub type plants proposed in the plan. That Oepartment.would
prefer the planting of conifers or decidious trees.
Thr> saundwall would be a twelve f
rr?tau+ visual and noise intrusionspfrom 9theacommercialr}arell
a to
Llit 1'? 117CI1Clal dry . Hi, irilyaLiu?l tysLd1n will also uc;
/ installed to help keep the grass, trees and shrubs healthy.
With the extensive review, the number of problems should be
minimal. However, staff is viewing the installation of this
buffer as a pilot model. If there are plant materials or
• arrangements which are determined to be undesirable, they will be
eliminated and replaced, and not repeated when the buffer is
constructed west of Lyndale Avenue.
Initially, the contractor is responsible for maintenance'. The
contractor must care and maintain the trees and shrubs for one
year from the date the work is completed. Care and maintenance
includes providing adequate soil moisture, tree wrapping, staking
and guying, mulch, rodent protection, insecticide and.
installations of replacement plants. For the sod, the contractor
is responsible for the first 30 day growing period. Maintenance
includes watering and replacement of any sod which digs during
the 30 day period. When the contractor is no lon9er.tespon5lble
for maintenance, the city assumes the responsibility.
Main te?n
.ance of this area will be funded through .a special ?
assessment levied against the nonresidential'property.in the area
south of 77th Street and east of Lyndale Avenue. Imposition;of a
special assessment was contemplated in_the'approved ILN
redevelopment plan. Staff will be requesting the establishment
of an assessment district in the near future.
Recommended Motion:
Award a contract to Lino.Lakes Nursery,.Wyoming,'MN, for
Landscaping, Screenwall,.Sidewalk and Appurtenant Work in the
amount of $128,933 which includes the base b}d plus selected
• alternate four.
Basis of Recommendation;
17 The bid by Lino Lake Nursery is the lowest responsible bid.
2. Funding for this work 44 available from the ILN tax increment
bonds of 1985.
Alternative Recommendation;
Council may choose to reject all bids and direct staff to obtain
new bids; however, the low bid is well within the engineer's
estimate pf $1438337.
Discussion/Decision Mode;
he council may choose to delay award'of this contract, keeping
in mind that the contract documents allow the bidders .to withdraw
their bids 60 days after the bid opening. Construction is
scheduled to begin in early September.
ct ull wubmitted,
0. Prosser
&tyManager
JOP/eia
9
-Omr
O, CL z
CD CD
?-
>O
.0
@3
n
o_
(D
m
N
O
to
=?
PMOL (Dr
rCLz.
C
b-r
O
CD
Mok
E, ^• r z9
T
rF •t?? x ? N
1
TT- -1-
-- ----L.-. _:iIJ1 13
I O I Q I 9 CA of A i oio 10
m
I I ; roi 9.00 °° °Q I
a l a I old I I CI C71 01 d C]r C3'
C7 ; 0 1
D* C3 CX C3'0
?J =ll?-
L+ -T C]!C7C70 C3 13
O
r C] C7 C7. O. C7
o aiC3,o-oob !
°! ? C] ° : c3 C) I O . o
'Lyrdaie Aye. Sc.
C Q +?i f' E ?......?.....1 ..
o eQ o
Om CY 13' 0' EY 13' C3 0
(? 1 13 00 o?d0:o
"1 L --- O o Q C o: G' O.
Iddddal ola!ol
a_-'_TT TT-1
-I ? 1? 1 0C'iOl0 O
110101
--CL0 0-1aa10101d]
L ALL
O
r - -. - - =
,T to a l o,o,? p I I F
a I ai
n !_ °L dLl.LLdddd L_1 C3 0
L__L_L
I/ Ugrtl A.A a
'13i D 0-131
otddddCY doR I d0!oi?
1 ? of o;0 0 o a ,? , ,,
I
j - `ob b o'a o ? r
-
0010,113113;010 oooo p 1 IO r'
r
I0.01601o,oo'oo'o'ooll I1O dclolc
L 1.i
Ip0°o;ol IC70,?n0 QC?O°;
Ldo°.o?to Obri0°o; ;aaddlo
7 7- -r T?- T T - T -, -T
ra , °I IIIO;?'00,0001 IQ Dt alb
117rJcaiO10;°I0 O!0 I ?i 1 13
LL -L_
••r.+r.l Avg ??
r"TTTT TT ; -?- - rTTT
Q010010101010 C7 1 0131 11310;01010
F•+-+-1-+++++TIT 4-I I-+++A-
IdDdo'O'O?"LOb,C3, 71ol 10101°1°l
A Ir?[? Av1r J7
rT-T-r?jjtul r TTT-r-
I ooQI?I?'?IC I
L_-L .U -)
3 T -T
' 0T 1_ I I
I I
°LL j I I I i I
-= -i- -?- -I I I I
o'plo?aLJ_
o101a o
-+ + ?O?C7 C
Di 01 01 01
-LLLJ
01 ? I°I
o1Oip;p
to;-o;aa o=aoo
ILN ASSESSMENT ROLL
Hampton Inn #34-028-24-33-0081
Hampton Inn #34-028-24-33-0082
Miller Beauty Supply #34-028-24-33-0003
Tires Plus #34-028-24-33-0006
Burmeister & Assoc. #34-028-24-33-0007
Lamettry's #34-028-24-33-0004
Michael O'Connell #34-028-24-33-0005
Lampert Lumber #34-028-24-33-0013
Lampert Lumber #34-028-24-33-0079
Richfield-Bloomington Honda #34-028-24-33-0080
Wicker's Oil #34-028-24-33-0073
I•
I0
?i
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
. Council Letter No. 95
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Original application for On-Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for
Discus Corporation, d/b/a Pizzeria Uno Restaurant and Bar,
located at 1420 East 78th Street.
Background:
In August, 1987 Discus Corporation applied for on-sale and Sunday
liquor licenses for a Pizzeria Uno Restaurant and Bar to be
located a 1420 East 78th Street, the site of the previous Mr.
Steak Restaurant.
Prior to the application being submitted, a conditional use
permit was granted for the site in July, 1987. This conditional
use permit is valid until July, 1988.
In September, 1987 the City Council voted not to grant Discus
Corporation the on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses.
The applicant is again requesting on-sale and Sunday liquor
licenses for the same concept, a Pizzeria Uno Restaurant and Bar.
The required background investigation has been conducted based
primarily upon the information supplied by the applicant. The
results of the investigation are listed below:
- Discus Corporation is a publicly held restaurant
development firm based in Bloomington that currently
operates four restaurants in the Minneapolis/St. Paul
area. Three of these restaurants are licensed to serve
liquor. The investigation indicates that Discus has an
excellent reputation in each of the communities where they
operate a restaurant.
- The principal owners of Discus, Michael Platt and Reynold
Anderson, are both residents of the Minneapolis area and
neither has any known criminal record.
- Pizzeria Uno, the franchisor, is a publicly held
corporation based in Boston, Massachusetts. Pizzeria Uno,
operates over 20 restaurants worldwide.
- The applicant has provided a $10,000 surety bond as well
as a certificates of insurance for public and liquor
liability coverages and workers compensation insurance
coverage.
- The applicant has provided copies of the lease and
franchisor/franchisee agreements.
The applicant has indicated that roughly $400,000 to
• $500,00 will be spent in remodeling. This remodeling will
not increase the size of the building, nor decrease the
size of the parking lot.
- The applicant has indicated that the proposed Uno's
restaurant will have a limited bar area and that liquor
sales will amount to only about 25% of the total sales of
the restaurant.
- The applicant has already designated a manager for the
restaurant, Mr. Jay Severson. Mr. Severson resides in
Richfield, and lives only about one block from the
restaurant. Mr. Severson is the former manager of the Mr.
Steak Restaurant which was located on the property. Mr.
Severson has no known criminal record and appears to be
well qualified for this position.
On March 23, 1988 representatives from Discus met with residents
who live near the site of the proposed Uno's restaurant.
At the meeting, Discus representatives discussed the Uno's
concept, emphasizing the fact that Uno's is not a "pizza joint",
but rather a full-service, upscale restaurant that offers a
variety of menu items, specializing in deep-dish, Chicago-style
pan pizza.
• Discus representatives also stated that Uno's concept emphasizes
food over liquor and projects itself as a family type of a
restaurant.
Residents who live in the area expressed concerns about parking,
noise, liter and the proposed expansion of Interstate 494.
The applicant has indicated that they cannot firm up their
financing until they know whether or not they will be able to
obtain the on-sale and Sunday liquor licenses. The licenses are
required to open and operate a Uno's.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the license application for On-Sale and Sunday Liquor
Licenses for Discus Corporation, d/b/a Pizzeria Uno Restaurant
and Bar, located at 1420 East 78th Street, with the following
four stipulations:
1. The applicant discloses the source(s) of all financing of
the project.
2. The applicant applies for and is granted a restaurant
license.
3. The applicant receives final approval and inspection for
all building and remodeling plans and a certificate of
occupancy.
• 4. The applicant pays the balance of all license and
investigative fees.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions
of both the city ordinance codes and state statutes
pertaining to on-sale and Sunday liquor.
2. The applicant has demonstrated that the business will be
an asset to the community.
Alternatives:
1. The council could decide to continue the hearing.
2. The council could decide to deny the licenses requested.
3. The council could decide to amend or drop the
stipulations.
Decision/Discussion Mode:
The public hearing to consider the request for the licenses by
Discus Corporation has been scheduled for April 11, 1988.
The applicant is anxious to begin the project and is requesting
that the council make a decision as soon as reasonably possible.
•
Respect Ally submitted,
Jame D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP/eja
I*
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Memorandum
DATE:
March 25, 1988
TO: Jack Erskine, Director of Public Safety
FROM: Agent Bill Hollick
SUBJECT: Concerns Expressed by Residents Regarding Proposed
Liquor License 4t 1400 East 78th Street.
On Wednesday evening March 23, 1988 a meeting was held between
Discus Corporation and residents in the area•of 77th Street and
14th Avenue.
Discus. Corporation has applied for an on-sale liquor license in
connection with a proposed Pizzeria Uno restaurant which will be
located at 1400 East 78th Street, the previous location of a Mr.
Steak restaurant.
During the course of the meeting which was attended by
• approximately ten residents, the following concerns were
expressed:
The extent of reconstruction of the 1494 freeway and
adjacent service ;oads and the effect of the
reconstruction on thq surrounding neighborhood.
The increase in traffic and parking problems that would
.result from another restaurant with liquor being located
next to the Ground Round.
The increase in noise and liter, especially during the
late night hours.
Whether the City should allow two establishments with
liquor to be located next to each other, adjacent to a
residential neighborhood.
The possibility that the applicant might change their
format from a family priented restaurant, if they were not
successful.
The residents that attended the meeting seem to be convinced that
the proposed Pizzeria Uno copcept is not "just another pizza
joint." They also seemed to understand that some type of
business will eventually open at that location. I expect that all
of the residents that attended the neighborhood meeting will
attend the City Council hearing scheduled for April 11, 1988.
DISCUS CORPORATION
COMPANY DISCRIPTION
dab,
The Discus Corporation is arestaurant development firm that
currently is the exclusive regional franchisee for three
restaurant concepts. Fuddruckers, Brick Oven and Pizzeria Uno.
The company was founded in 1983 and opened its first restaurant
in November, 1984.
Discus operates three Fuddruckers restaurants in the
Minneapolis/St.Paul area, three in.Milwaukee and the company has
justed opened its first restaurant in St. Louis, Mo. The company
also operates the Brick Oven restaurant in Roseville, and plans
are to open its first Pizzeria Uno in Richfield.
N
PIZZERIA UNO RESTAURANT
CONCEPT
MENU AND CONCEPT:
Pizzeria Uno restaurants are full-service restaurants which
feature gourmet, Chicago-style deep-dish pizzas and a variety of
sandwiches, hamburgers, appetizers, salads, desserts and
beverages. The Company's signature product is its deep-dish
pizza. All menu items are prepared at the restaurants and are
available for carry-out service.
Pizzeria Uno restaurants offer a casual, friendly and
entertaining atmosphere, efficient service and high-quality menu
items at moderate prices. Entree selections currently range in
price from approximately $2.75 to $4.95, with the average person
revenue per meal, including beverages, being approximately $6.50.
All Company-owned full-service restaurants offer full liquor
selection, with most restaurants having a bar and lounge. During
fiscal 1986, food sales constituted approximately 750 of total
restaurant revenues of the Company, and alcoholic beverages sales
accounted for the remaining 250.
Pizzeria Uno restaurants are located in both urban areas and
suburban shopping and entertainment areas. The typical
restaurant occupies approximately 5,000 square feet, with seating
capacity of approximately 150 customers. Each restaurant employs
50 to 70 people, most of whom are part-time personnel. Most
restaurants are open from 11:00 A.M. to midnight, seven days per
week.
GENERAL:
The Company currently owns and operates 11 full-service
restaurants in Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island. There
are 22 franchised Pizzeria Uno restaurants operated by 15
franchisees located in 10 states. The Company has entered into
agreements with existing and new franchisees for the addition of
approximately 20 new franchised restaurants over the next 24
months.
RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT:
The staff for a typical Pizzeria Uno restaurant consists of one
general manager, two assistant managers and 50 to 70 hourly
employees. The Company conducts an initial seven-week training
program for all managers and franchisees focusing on restaurant
operations. The Company employs a franchise operations director
and a field service supervisor who are responsible for
supervising all franchised restaurants. Their duties include
quarterly visits and detailed, annual inspections of quality,
service and sanitation.
r
MICHAEL E. PLATT
Michael E. Platt, age 44, has served as President and CEO of Discus
Corporation, franchisee-operator of Fuddruckers Restaurants in Minnesota
and Wisconsin, since August, 1983. Discus currently operates six (6)
restaurants and went public in August, 1985. For the previous seven
years he was employed by the Pillsbury Company, most recently as Director
of Acquisitions.
Prior to joining Pillsbury in 1976, Mr. Platt served in various marketing
positions as Vice President of Marketing for Steak'n Shake Restaurants
based in Indianapolis, Indiana; Director of New Products for Kentucky
Fried Chicken Corporation, Louisville, Kentucky and Senior Product Manager,
General Foods Corporation, White Plains, New York.
I Mr. Platt graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1963
with a degree in Industrial Management,- and received an M.B.A. from Harvard
University in 1965.
Resume of Reynold M. Anderson Sr.
Reynold M. Anderson is a contractor and financial manager with more than 30 years experience,
having developed, constructed, and arranged financing for more than 75 restaurants and hundreds
of apartment buildings, double bungalows, single-family homes, and townhouses.
Mr. Anderson Is the Managing General partner of Zaeco Aasociates Llml!ed Partnership (Zaeco
L.P.), and for more than 20 years was ttie Presides t of ita predecessor corporation Zaeco, Inc.,
which built 60 Perkins and 6 Mr. Steak restaurants throughout the United States. Zaeco LP. and
its predecessor have been a family owned and operated business for over 60 years. Zaeco L.P. Is
the owner of numerous commercial rental properties with a market equity in excess of
$13,000,000. As the general contractor for hundreds of constriction projects, Mr. Anderson has
extensive executive background in administration, organization and financial management.
Mr. Anderson Is also the President, Director and a major Shareholder of Reynolds Construction,
Inc., a corporation formed to build restaurants and other. commercial projects throughout. the
United Staies. Reynolds Construction, Inc. has the exclusive rights to develop and renovate
properties for Discus Corporation, T.H.I.S. Corporation, Mlntesota, Inc., Flour Bin International,
Inc., Mexican Village, Inc. and Zaeco L.P.
In addition, Mr. Anderson recently formed Zaeco Leasing Company, a corporation that leases
restaurant equipment to Perkins restaurants. Mr. Anderson Is the President, Treasurer, Director
and a major shareholder.
Mintesota, Inc., and T.H.1.6. Corporation are Florida corporations that have franchise rights to
develop and operate Perkins restaurants in several counties in Florida. Mr. Anderson is an Officer,
Shareholder, and Chairman of the Board of Mintesota, Inc. and T.H.I.S. Corporation.
The Discus Corporation, of which Mr. Anderson was a founding Shareholder, was formed to
operate franchised Fuddruckers restaurants. With 6 Fuddruckers already built, the Discus
Corporation has an Agreement to open a minimums of 14 Fuddruckers restaurants by 1989. In
addition, Discus Corporation owns the franchise' ."rights tb'bulld' Brick Oven restaurants in nine
states. The fourth Brick Oven restaurant irk the United States Just opened in Roseville, Minnesota
Mr. Anderson Is the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director, and a major Shareholder of the
Discus Corporation. In addition, the Discus Corporation has an agreement with Mr. Anderson
whereby Discus Corporation has agreed to employ Mr. Anderson and/or his affiliates to remodel
existing buildings and/or constrict new buildings for the Fuddruckers restaurants.
Mr. Anderson has ownership Interests in seve6f other entitles including Mexican Wage, Inc., Flour
Bin International. Inc., and Is the Managing Partner for many active and successful limited
partnerships that own and operate Perkins restaurants. U7,4<
Mr. Anderson, 56, is a professional clvN engineer who Is registered with the State of Minnesota He
received his degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1954, and is a lifetime
resident of Minneapolis. Mr. Anderson has been and Is involved In many community projects.
a
F
'JAY SYVERSON'
H I have been employed by the Discus Corporation since April, 1987
as General Manager of the Pizzeria Uno restaurant in Richfield,
Minnesota. This restaurant site was formerly a Mr. Steak
restaurant and will open in the Fall of 1987.
I had been the General Manager for 9 years for the Mr. Steak
restaurant in Richfield, MN from October, 1978 through March, 1987.
During this period I spent 231 months opening a Mr. Steak in
Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, near Madison, from August - October, 1981.
I have completed a health course at the University,'of Minnesota
on Food Born Illnesses and a Restaurant Management course
at Hennepin County..Vo-Tech in Septsmber,..1987.
V
?l
8/87
a
S
F-
ir
O
Z
IC
1
i
W
W
Q
N
a in
•- a
V1 w
O ?
N 1
W
w
U
I .J w
} LL
H
a
Z
CL ~
t
ir
m x
G.
I LU
1
I
? I
77th ST. W.j
t ? f
HLlt
?
X
O
Z
'3A
v •
H19t
j FT1
!V _
03Ad -• NOIDNIAOO-A
• .S 3Ad HLS t
LLi
N
il El
'J
1
'lllll??lll??l??lll?ll w = -
co L
co tL
133i1233i1?7NUUIU 0
?
'OS *3AV
r ? t
J
"3AY
5 '3AY Hlcr
-05 "-3AY : His I
I= ' 'S '3AY H121
O
.dAY • NOIDNInOO-A
"3AY HIN
((/ r //
w V
U
cry
T W
• CO
W W
U
Iz
!W 0
IJ 'W
:¢
LL
ui ,
c!) 0
z
co
??
f
Q
J
CL
'Z
.uj
j 2
CL
O
W
0
LLI
i z
LU
.S
LU
O
U
"3Ab WIC I
V5 -3Ab • H1.5Z I
MAY • NOIONIA00-9
'33 AV
Htbt
. m
' W
U-
m
c'-n Z
W
T
W
LLI I
c LU
LL.
C
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 94
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Public hearing on the request for approval of the subdivision of
the property located at 6824 13th Avenue.
Background:
Mr. Hans C. Misvaer, owner of the property at 6824 13th Avenue,
has requested approval to subdivide this property into two new
single family residential lots.
The existing single family home on the site would be demolished.
Two new single family dwellings would then be constructed.
The existing lot is 114 feet x 127.57 feet. The two new lots
would have dimensions of 57 feet x 127.57 feet. The proposed
lots would meet the city lot area, lot width and lot depth
requirements for the single family district. The preliminary
plat map indicates that the new lots would have adequate
buildable area for single family dwellings while meeting the
setback requirements.
At the March 22, 1988 Planning Commission meeting, the commission
unanimously (7 to 0) recommended City Council approval of the
subdivision at 6824 13th Avenue.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the preliminary plat as shown for the property located at
6824 13th Avenue.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The preliminary plat meets the requirements indicated in
the subdivision and zoning ordinances (Sec. 523).
2. Both of the lots would meet the city requirements for
single family residence district.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council may deny the subdivision request if it can be
demonstrated that the subdivision of the existing lot would have
a negative impact on the abutting properties.
Decision Mode:
A public hearing is scheduled before the City Council at 7:00
p.m., Monday, April 11, 1988 to consider this subdivision
request.
Written notice of the hearing was provided to the property owners
within 350 feet of the subject site. Legal notification was also
published in the Richfield Sun Current newspaper.
Respect 9 ly submitted,
Jame WD.Prosser
City Manager
m a V ? - - O O V O .1 A V ?
> s o u .. . s s > > a
a
1? y ti N y y r r r ? ti r ? ti y ?Ni
XERXES AVE-+?•---.?_ _ ?..r - _.s _ r--?'1+•- _
VINE I?-\-?'•r -`\-' -- - _1 _'? ±,?'? mac- -
C NT
UPTON
THOMAS
SHERIDAN
RUSSELL
QUEEN j!,
PENN ''_?•---
OLIVE: 1
NEWTON III --'-1.=-JjY
MORGAN
LOGAN --J=.
KNOX o?
JAMES ?? Jo'L•- oo
1r r t? I
IRVING
J
?-
HUMBOLDT
GIRARD • J-??
FREMONT i -_-.?.-_--?- -
EMERSON 12TH AVE S
DUPONT ?•
1
COLFAX CYi
BRYANT I'! ^ e
t
ALDRICH '
LYNDALE AVE.
CANFIELO
HARRIET i m ?:}:•: ??
DRANO ?.•::::i {:?:•
PLEASANT 13TH AVE S
?ILLSSURr !
WENTWOiTH II•
BLAISDELL
HICOLLET AVE. r-?
1st (?? :.:' o 00
STEVENS
w
I I 1
zA? ??o _? o•_J
o moo
3rd
GUNTON
• <:i:•::: 'iti:: ''::4::
4 M -M
SNI r ??oL.? '•,N,F••.. '•••••• t?
PORTLAND AVE. r ?ooo? '`?^ {}2{''; ti{•};. ?? -. ..) l-J
OAKLAND IC
'I i!?oul `: loo
PARK l-J ?
COLUMBUS " :;r `•? y -J
CHICAGO I,J000:. I?,•• ?:: `• {:i;:;'r:: L_Jo i a
ELL
IOT 4?iI looo, `oJJ.• o;-J;-J
10 th
11 th ?I-Joo ool 000
Is 11 "1' =7oo?_Joo Ooo =70
1A 1K oo? ??? ooo?oo
oo?o -- 0000
15 th
SLDOIIINGTON I; ooo ?oo ?o
i; I oo; •==1?0 ooL-lo 00
-'- oo?o?"Uo?oooo
16 1%
nu 1I
IBiA ooooU ?ooooo0
CEDAR AVC.
LONGFELLOR
a• V Y 1 ,. v N r G-- ,
r IC- 7 7C
z A ?'
AoC2 t?
2 ? 'R
<
;u
o
y N 1
0
N
N
y N >f
2
e o
S
N y 1E
t
XERXES AVE.
`- WASHBURN
VINCENT
- ° 4 UPTON
JI THOMAS
--- SNERIDAN
RUSSELL
OUEEN
PENN AVE.
?L7. OLIVER
1. NEWTON
oo' MORGAN
I
-- LOGAM
^? -- I) KNOX
r--? p JAMES
IRVING
HUMBOLDT
I
I? GIRARD
--- P
FREMDIri
EMERSON
Ij DUPONT
III' COLFAX
?+?II SRYANT
• ALDRICH
LYNDALE AVE.
III GARFIELD
1
HARRIET
nn,;ll GRAND
1
PLEASANT
I I PILLSBURY.
Qa lWENTWORTH :,,I IBLAISDELI
NICOLLET AVE.
lot
STEVENS
2M
3rd
CLINTON
l ?•J I •
3t
t
?. .
PORTLAND AVE.
?'. OAKLAND
PARK
i COLUMBIA
II CHICAGO
ELLIOT
1110 f.
Il tll
12,K
%
Q 131 III
is
Q
13,11
O BLOOMINGTON
s 111
ITtU
CEDAR AVE.
LONGFELLOW
C? „111
JJ 20+R
21 .1
? zzA?
STANDISH
23 r11
M
H
•
r
O
n
a
O
Z
0
OD
N
A
W
-04
x
C
rn
t?
•
6824 13TH AVE S
r
7'
5 57
N
1 5
•M
ti
N
A
5
BUILDABLE AREA
IA
N
r
.....:::1 1 EXISTING HOUSE
a: ----- ..:........
BUILDABLE • AREA 5
,
5
W•
Q
D
_Z
N
X •
p W
M
114
13TH AVE S
N
68TH ST E
ZONING
rn
W
a
s
T
T
Ch
W
Q
s
I --
cm
T
6824 13TH AVE Sls'3,
69TH ST E
70TH ST E
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
46
W
W
a
s
C
T
t
N
W
Q
s
H
to
T
- LAND USE
cn
W
Q
to
T
CA
W
Q
S
T
T
6824 13TH AVE S'?? ?
N
W
Q
F
N
r
89TH ST E
PARK
a SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
70TH ST E
CD
W
Q
1-
T
t
N
8TH ST E
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 93
Agenda April 11, 1988
I'. 0
Issue Statement:
Purchase in Excess of $5,000 for Repair of Well V.
Background:
The city council purchasing policy resolution provides that when
the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction
exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase shall be
submitted to the city council for consideration.
Deep Well V, located in front of the water plant, collapsed on
February 24, 1988.
Water division personnel inspected the well hole with a remote
television camera lowered into the hole. The video tape
indicated that 960 feet down, approximately 200 feet of the hole
bottom was blocked off due to a collapse in the rock sidewalls of
the hole.
Staff worked with engineering consultants Orr-Schelen-Mayeron to
determine the repair work needed to reopen the well hole.
Vendors were asked to prepare quotations with a work completion
date no later than June 1, 1988.
On March 30, 1988 four informal quotes were received for the
repair of Well #7:
Keys Well Drilling Co. $13,800
E.H. Renner and Sons $13,925
Layne Minnesota $21,550
Bergerson-Caswell, Inc. $22,750
This is an unanticipated expenditure. Funding for the repair of
Well #7 was not included in the adopted 1988 operating budget for
water maintenance. Expenditures associated with the cost of the
emergency repair will be included in the revised 1988 operating
budget.
Recommended Motion:
Approve a purchase in the amount of $13,800 with Keys Well
Drilling Co. for the repair of Well #7.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Keys Well Drilling Company submitted the low quotation.
2. They are a reputable company with whom we have done
business in the past.
• 3. Municipal contracting statutes allow the informal
quotation process used in this case.
40 Alternative Recommendation:
1. Council could reject all quotes and instruct staff to
obtain new quotations through an informal quotation
process or through a formal bidding process.
2. A formal bid procedure may not allow enough time to meet
our self-imposed June l deadline for completion of the
work.
3. Staff believes that a formal bid process will not result
in a lower price. If fact, the price will very likely be
higher.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for the April 11, 1988 City Council
meeting.
Delaying repair until after the midsummer peak water consumption
time could affect our ability to meet demand. Once ordered, the
work should be done within two weeks.
Respect lly submitted,
Jam s D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP/eja
10
?Ztf
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 92
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Proclamation designating April, 1988 State Cable Month
Background:
The National Cable Television Association is promoting April as
National Cable Month. Governor Perpich has proclaimed April as
State Cable Month. Dottie Rietow, representative of Rogers Cable
Systems, has asked that Richfield also designate April as Cable
Month.
During April, Rogers will host the annual volunteer public access
programming event, the Teddy Awards, on April 28, at the Eden
Prairie studio. Rogers is also planning community outreach
activities, and special programs with schools.
Recommended Motion:
Read the attached proclamation, designating April as cable month.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. Rogers has requested the City show their support of
cable TV by issuing this proclamation.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Do not issue the proclamation.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item has been placed on the presentation portion of the
April 11 City Council agenda, even though it is unlikely that a
Rogers representative will be present to accept the proclamation.
Respectfully submitted,
?aJ
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP/eja
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 91
Agenda April 11, 1988
Issue Statement:
Presentation of Plaque for Achievement of Certified Municipal
Clerk Status to City Clerk Thomas P. Ferber
Background:
The Municipal Clerks and Finance Officers Association (MCFOA) of
Minnesota and the International Institute of Municipal Clerks
(IIMC) sponsor a certification program for municipal clerks who
have attained specified standards of education, experience, and
service.
City Clerk Thomas Ferber has met the necessary requirements
including:
* Completion of the 3 year Municipal Clerks Institute
program at the University of Minnesota.
* 3 years as a full time municipal clerk
* Bachelors degree in Public Administration
* Attendance at various MCFOA and IIMC conferences
* Approval of the MCFOA Certification Committee on
Accreditation
On March 24, 1988 at the annual MCFOA Conference City Clerk Tom
Ferber was presented a plaque in recognition of achieving the
status of Certified Municipal Clerk. He was also elected as a
member of the Executive Board of the MCFOA for 1988-89.
10Recommened Motion:
Present the MCFOA Plaque to City Clerk Tom Ferber recognizing his
achievement in attaining the Certified Municipal Clerk status.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. The MCFOA has certified Tom Ferber as a Certified
Municipal Clerk.
2. The city council wishes to take such opportunities to
recognize achievements of city staff, especially at a
public forum such as a city council meeting.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The city council could choose not to make the
presentation.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Action on this item is suggested for April 11, 1988.
Respectfully submitted,
j go
James Prosser
City Manager
JDP/eja