Loading...
07-23-84 agendaHOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Office of Executive Director HRA Letter No. 36 Agenda of July 23, 1984 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commissioners City of Richfield Subject: Acquiring Scattered Sites Dear Commissioners: - At the July 16, 1984 HRA meeting the HRA briefly discussed acquisition of housing on scattered sites. For the July 23, 1984 meeting, staff will have photographs available of each of -the five sites being given primary consideration. This letter discusses the five sites and the order in which staff recommends proceeding to determine prices for acquiring the scattered sites. Following acquisition of 1016 West b6th Street and 901-03 Rae Drive (including anticipated relocation claims for tenants), there will be approximately $100,000 available in year IX (1983- $4) and year X (1984-85) CDBG funds to acquire additional properties. Attached is a list of sites where property owners have indicated an interest in selling to the HRA. These are garage homes or smaller cottage type homes located toward the center of a site. Property data and comments about each site are included. Each of the owners responded to Voluntary Acquisition Program advertising. The programs' guideline section entitled "Property Selection Criteria" is used by staff in evaluating these sites and follows: Property will be inspected, evaluated and recommended for purchase if it meets criteria 4~1, a or b or c or d; and ~~2 or ~~3. 1) The property is: a. Substandard as to condition, size or usage. b. Obsolete and of faulty design on the block and area in which it is located. c. A deteriorating factor which has caused blight to other adjoining properties. d. Detrimental to the safety or health of abutting properties in block. 2) The parcel could become a marketable lot which could provide a site for new housing or substantially rehabilitated housing. HRA LETTER N0. 36 -2- 3) Property which has been voluntarily proposed for purchase by the owner which in the judgement of the HRA would help alleviate the shortage of housing for low and moderate-income families if acquired. The values presented in the site listing are based on Hennepin County Assessors estimated market values (EMV). Garage homes and cottage type structures particularly those suffering deterioration and obsolecence are often under valued because there are not many comparable structures an_d sales to assist in determining value.. Independent appraisals will be secured-by staff to help determine values. Acquisition prices may range from 10 to 30 percent higher than the 1984 EMV. As the comment section suggests, these homes suffer from deterioration and obsolecence due to age, location on site, size and condition. Ranking is difficult. It is not appropriate to rank the selection preferance solely on EMV since other factors, such as lot size, housing conditions, and need for paying relocation must also be considered. In addition to the 5 primary sites, there is a list of 74 garage homes and g vacant lots attached to this letter as secondary sites to consider. This list was developed by staff from a list compiled by the Community Development Department Planning staff in August 1983 as an inventory of garage homes and vacant lots. Thus, these sites have not been offered to the HRA, but are a resource of sites to refer to if the primary sites do not remain available. The estimated values of the garage homes range from $32,500 to $75,400. Staff does not recommend the higher value property. However, it is one way of indicating to the HRA that not all garage homes are good acquisitions. Some provide decent,, safe, sanitary and affordable housing opportunities for persons that could not otherwise afford housing in single family neighborhoods. The primary and secondary sites listed in this letter are not all inclusive for properties which could qualify for acquisition. Since advertising for sites continues, there may be additional offers that would be appropriate for the HRA to consider in the future. The HRA will be notified if additioal site resources are actually offered and found to be needed to efficiently utilize the CDBG funds. With the approximate $100,000 available, it appears that two acquisitions could occur. Enough funds are available for clearance (approximately $5,000 each site) and tenant relocation (approximately $5,000) for each site. HRA Letter No. 36 -s~- If the primary list and its order of sites is satisfactory to the HRA, staff will proceed in determining the purchase price of sites in the order listed: 7521 Dupont; 6820 - 12th, 7245 Humboldt, 7508 Colfax, 7520 Bryant. (lace values are determined, the HRA will have the opportunity to consider authorizing the acquisitions. The value information should be available for the August, 198 meeting. Respectfully submitted, ~.; ,~,,,~ ! lL ~~ John G. Cart. ght City Manager JGC/eja A These properties meet the conditions mentioned, in order of preference: Site 1984 Assessor EMV Site Dimensions/Size 7521 Dupont $33,400 50'x130' (6;500 sq. ft.) 6820-12th $3$,900 7245 Humboldt $48,800 S9.5'xi30' (7,735 sq. ft.) 100'x93' 19,300 sq. ft.) Comments house vacant, no relocation benefits antici~tated, structure approximately 480 sq.ft. on the main level, no basement. Built, .1939. Lot size slightly less than ordinance allows, variance to size prior to construction needed. .Can result in one single _ -- family dwelling, new construction. homeowner occupied, no relocation benefits anticipated, structure approximately 400 sq. ft. on main level, full basement. Date of dwelling construction unknown.. Placed on basement foundation, .1954. Lot size large enough to permit moving a rehabitable structure on to site (Vo-Tech). Can result in one single family dwelling. owner occupied, no reloca- tion benefits anticipated. Structure approximately 980 sq. ft. on two levels. No basement, Lot size large enought to permit moving a rehabitable structure on to site (vo-tech). Vo-tech evaluated the existing structure approximately 2 years ago and found it not suitable for rehabilitation. Can result in one single family dwelling. Site 1984 Assessor EMV Site Dimensions/Size 7508 Colfax $34;100 50'x130' (6,500 sq. ft.) 7520 Bryant $39,800 50'x130' (b,500 sq. ft) Comments tenant occupied, reloca- tion benefits anticipated. Structure approximately 400 sq. ft. on~tnain level, crawl space type basement. Built,. 1943• Lot size slightly less than ordinance allows, variance to size .prior to construction needed. Can result in one single family dwelling, new construction. HRA~new construction single Family rental unit on property directly adjacent. tenant occupied, relocation benefits anticipated, structure approximately 550 sq. ft. on main level. No basement. Built, 1946. Lot size slightly less than ordinance allows, variance to size prior to construction needed. Can result in one single family dwelling, new construction. -•: •- N ti NfiONrlf I11 ZZ i~ li w 02 _ VIN MOM3de1N)7 _~,a 3Ar tlr43a Y/ n Vlll .I„ ~ i NOlONN11pQq V1 91 VI N VI t7 - Y111 ~,~ VI It 1 viOt II . WRT3'~ awalNa (1 m„I,nea ,1 71N911 aNr~xre 7At 0Nr11tlOd V11 VIVr Noawra ' Nt bZ SN7~31f ' of ~3M1 13TO~IN ~t~ ~~~ C N1tlOM1N7A ~ ~ j 1iN119'11id ,I i I iMrfr311 ; CNrtlB 111 131tlNtM 11 ai3lttlw~ 9Ar 31rONA1 NCtItl01V' ~~i 1N)/4i1N i~'t xrs^w~ d `I C>; 1NOdfM ~I \ I Nostl3w3 '' ~~: LNOR#Y ~ ~ atlrllro ii ~I 10~0/1MM ,I sNUtll yl~l~--~ S3MS'1' i'~~. xOMll III I'. N r901 -'~ ~' ~_~ Nr9tl011 ~CI NOlM3N :{I~-1 tl 3 A t 1011 , i~{ ,.,-~~~ t 3Ar NN3d r"-' N33M ,,~ 173SSIttl NIGIY3MS 'ry~i~ SfNONl 'a-.~' NOldn ;..--_ LN33NIA ~f-=~= NyMNSrM t~ _. 3Ar 43xtl3x =~~-~ H H N N O p ~~ ~ 0 a V A ! N M r •~~t ., 2 0 ~~ It. ~ Z > ~~ ~_ w i. Z ca V d ~) yT "N~ynW M ~b N~ H N N N N N it a ~ F °.. 3 lu A ~ ti • w w w w ~ r~ ___~"L4lTS~3!~~_- _~~~_ _~ M01't3d9N01 ~;~! ~L~L~ IL ;~!~~.t~i ~ li V191 ((~~~~ '^\ VI it JL('r~'J* '~~ I ~~d Y141 ~~ ~ ;CC~~1 .11~° ~C ~ YI11 _ J~~ !Q~I i~_l~~ I~~ Ylof _ I, 10113 ~CQ~n ;~,+ ~~©~~~t_J~0 ~1~p snawmuo ~ 't ~~-~T~~~ ~~--~-~± 1 ~~ 71tlrd ~1~.~..1~ .-...r+rffh....~:L~("~~I""~(f~~~'1 !I i~ 3Ar ONI11li0d I~~ ~ r i ~ ~1~L~J~_ ~.:~li ~ ~ Vi4 O ©~ L L i I rIr ~~Q~ ~CC~ ', No1111-n ~~~`~Q I ~~ I oaa •-1 1 ~.~i i~~ I I N 0~~~ t ~ SN3A315 C~ \ ~~~~I f \ •3A7 i311001N ',LI :s:~:rxi-1l-'sM!~a.'~`.-~{_a.~.iw ~~I_+~. .l~~y Lir9r3~d I ~ ' .1...-_. I _ ~ 131tlNrN O ~~~~ ~~,,'~~~^--~~~ry-.~~~~,:.,'~~ II 3Ardtl3lrONAI ~ I~~^^~~ ~ I. N71YO~t ~--~ rea+ ;iM ill lwr/tlt O C ~, ~ - ~ xraioo ~ \~ C i' 7~'~~.=,',~I ~" / arm va~ ICI m ~ '----- _' _ - _= - - -_= t ~n loioaNnN ~ ~ ~~~ 3 '< i 1/ ~~~ 9NIAY1 O ~~~~~ x ~ ~ r~l ~ I ~ i ~ 43Nt1' O ~~~~~L~~~~ ~` .r--~ xoN~l (zl +~ I^~.,~~ NrfltlON ~~ ~`-' '3Ar NN3d Ri N i`I U ~r~: ' _--_ - r-~~ ,_ -= - ~~ LN30NU _- _ ~ ~~ ~ ;~ ~, 'q~-'?~ ~ NynBN9rM ~r:~....;.~.-e-:- -- ..._y,ae-_ _ ~=rs-rs :^•:sfr~ 3Ar s3xa3x N N N N N N N V! N N N N p P N N N N N t ~ = = ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ GARAGE. HOUSES PROPERTY ADDRESS PINS ~~'S 6400 VINCENT 2902824130065 6900 VINCENT 2902824430121 6645 LIPTON 2902824424015 6817 RUSSELL 2902824440037 6820 RUSSELL ~ 2902824440046 b933 QUEEN 2902824440170 7321 PENN 3302824230012 6539 OLIVER 2802824230092 6841 NEWTON 2802824330019 6924 NEWTON 2802824330073 6321 MORGAN 2$02824220077 6838 MORGAN 2802824330134 6813 LOGAN 2802824340052 6955 KNOX 2802824340075 6414 JAMES 2$02824240044 6930 JAMES 2802824340072 6514 IRVING 2802824240115 6440 HUMBOLDT 2802824240009 7517 HiJMBOLDT 3302824420077 6621 GIRARD 2802824420027 7521 GIRARD 3302824420095 7525 GIRARD 3302824420094 7529 FREMONT ~ 3302824420111 7333 EMERSON 3302824130090 7-10-84 7435 EMERSON 7437 EMERSON 6315 DUPONT 7429 DUPONT 7433 CALFAX 750$ COLFAX 7520 COLFAX 7344 BRYANT 7436 BRYANT 7520 BRYANT 7528 BRYANT 6313 ALDRICH 7304 ALDRICH 7301 GARFIELD 6833 GRAND 6801 PLEASANT 7221 NICDLLET 7319 NICOLLET 7615 NICOLLET 71.01 1ST 7225 1ST 6600 STEVENS 6612 2ND 7232 2ND 7316 CLINTON 6620 5TH 6632 5TH 3302824420014 3302824420013 280282411006 3302824410076 3302824410052 3302824410085 3302824410088 3302824140047 3302824410048 3302824410110 3302824410112 2802824110038 3302824140019 3402824230129 2702824330070 2702824340019 3402824130096 3402824130013 3402824430065 3402824120092, 3402824130058 2702$24420070. 2702824420068 3402824130121 3402824140086 2702824410028 2702824410131 6715 PORTLAND 2602824320089 6850 PORTLAND 2702824400010 7300 PORTLAND 3402824140015 6825 ELLIOT 2602824340085 6939. 12TH 2602824430096 6812 13TH 2602824430022 6935 13TH 2602824430087 6237 14TH 26028241.20069 6844 14TH 2602824430056 6945 14TH 2602824430013 6310 15TH 2602824120077 6404 15TH 2602824130052 6415 15TH 2602$24130047 6501 15TH 2602824130115 6300 BLOOMINGTON 2602824120098 6421 CEDAR 2502824230067 6436 19TH 2502824230084 6437 19TH 2502824230103 6516. 19TH 2502824230023 6521 19TH 2502824230033 6524 19TH 2502824230021 6408 21ST 2502824230137 6421 22ND 2502824240077 2118 W. 69th Street 7015 Penn 7021 Penn. 7201 Penn 7444 4th Avenue 6601 lst Avenue 6520 Standish 6524 Standish 2200 E. 66th Street VACANT LOTS 28 028 24 33 0141 33 028 24 22 0003 33 028 24 220004 33 '028 24 23 0006 34 02$ 24 41 0059 27 028 24 420069 25 028 24 24 0031 25 028 24 24 0030 25 028 24 24 0023 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Office of Executive Director HRA fetter No. 35 Agenda July 23, 1984 Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commissioners City of Richfield _ _ Subject: Project Plans for Market Plaza Development Council Members: At the regular HRA meeting of July 16, 1984, the HRA deferred action on .approval of the project plans far Market Plaza, and then set a special meeting far July 23, 1984. The staff has had an opportunity to review the project plans for Market Plaza and has arrived at the conclusion that the plans, as submitted., do not meet all of the requirements of Article IV, Section 4.6 of the Developers agreement. The plans were submitted to the city on July 16, 1984. Therefore, under the terms of the developer's agreement, the HRA has 20 days (or until August 5, 1984) to reject or approve the project plans. If the plans are not rejected by that date, they will then be deemed to be approved. Based upon the present status of the project plans, the HRA has two options at this time. They include (1) take no action on the plans at this time and set another special meeting prior to August 5, 1984; or (2) conditionally approve the project plans, subject to the remedying of deficiencies and approval by the city staff. It is recommended that the HRA follow option two by conditionally approving the Project Plans subject to final approval by the city staff. The staff will be available to answer specific questions on this subject at the meeting on July 23, 1984. Respectfully submitted, ohn G. C tw ght Executive Director JGC/eja Ci7Y Of RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Inter-Office Memorandum DATE July 19, 1984 ~ TO Sohn Cartwright, City Manager ,l FROM Sivert Hendrickson, Building Offical.. SUBJECT Review of preliminary plans for Market Plaza_Development and Woodlake Point Condominium Plans. Plans. are-not complete:. enough for evaluation of code compliance in all respects. I have the following concerns from review of the plans I received on July 17, 1984. Site: Parking for and access by physically handicapped persons is not defined. Aa additional hydrant. is required in front of the commercial building. Market Plaza Building: Exits from garage are not spaced adequately. Exit stair from apartment building on west end-must discharge on grade. Exits from commercial spaces are not defined. E"levator lobbies must. be enclosed and separated from corridors. Storage areas along corridors must be 1 Hour Rated construction with labeled doors. Apartment unit plans do not evidence compliance with light - and. ventilation requirements for kitchens. No parking spaces for handicapped persons are defined in the garage area. - Woodlake Point Condominium Building: _ It appears that additional exits are required from community room and dining room areas. Winder stairs as proposed in some loft units are not in compliance . I recommend that approval by HRA be subject to Fire and Inspections .Division reviews of final plans and specifications.