Loading...
09-19-1988.. v, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA HRA Letter No. 34 September 19, 1988 Issue Statement Adoption of a resolution authorizing execution of an Annual Contribution Contract (ACC) to receive Section 8 Voucher Housing Assistance Payments from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Background- On September 12, 1988, the HRA was notified by HUD that an allocation of housing assistance was being made available. A summary follows: -HUD will provide $280,.15 annually and $1,402,075 over a five year period to provide housing payment assistance to clients and administrative fees to the HRA. -Approximately 53 or slightly more households (41-2 bedroom and 12-3 bedroom) will benefit, depending on the unit mix that is finalized in cooperation with HUD. -The ACC must be executed prior to September 30, 1988, preferably on September 19, 1988 to demonstrate to HUD the HRA's intent to accept the allocation. -Documentation which supports the ACC must be prepared (the annual budget, administrative plan, equal opportunity plan, and utility allowance schedule), submitted, and approved by HUD before the ACC is effective and voucher lease-up can begin. Richfield presently serves, on behalf of Metro HRA, 379 units (316 certificates and 63 vouchers). The 53 unit voucher allocation directly from HUD, when exchanged one for one with existing certificates will result in the following program configuration: Number of Units Type of Assistance Administering Entity 53 Vouchers Richfield HRA 63 Vouchers Richfield HRA on behalf of Metro HRA 263 Certificates Richfield HRA on behalf. of Metro HRA This arrangement raises several issues, the answers to which staff is presently pursuing. 1) How can the 263 certificate and 63 voucher clients that cannot benefit from a Richfield allocation at this time be served? ;A recommended course of action is to develop a program to replace these vouchers. The program would be phased over a period of time. ~~ 4/ Potential possibilities include: -written commitments, if possible, from HUD and Metro HRA to continue to assist Richfield in securing additional allocations. -action by the HRA and City Council to adopt a modified resolution by September 30, 1988 to allow the Richfield HRA/Metro HRA administrative relationship to continue while replacement units are sought. The next available allocation may occur in Spring, 1989. Richfield would be reimbursed at a $13.50 per unit per month rate for administrative expenses with such an administrative relationship. -negotiations with Metro HRA to release the 63 Metro HRA vouchers to Richfield. 2) How to serve the 53 voucher households being made available to Richfield: Utilization of readily available technical resources to ensure a rapid lease up would be appropriate. -HUD seeks lease-up by September 30 but has offered to consider a flexible alternative schedule. -Metro HRA has offered for a fee to be determined, to act asp a fiscal agent for the HRA; assisting in the preparation of annual budgets, making monthly housing assistance payments, and providing general advice on program administration. -The required documentation is being prepared by staff at this time in consultation with Metro HRA and HUD. While much appears unresolved, the HRA has until October 7, 1988 to finalize a course of action. This date is the expiration date for all agreements with Metro HRA. Richfield residents can no longer receive Metro HRA housing assistance without an agreement after this date. Metro HRA suggests an earlier deadline, prior to October 1, 1988, since October lease-up situations are affected by whether Richfield is still part of the Metro system. HUD suggests a still earlier deadline, prior to September 30, 1988 since the allocation of assistance will be lost on this date (the end of the federal fiscal year) if an ACC is not executed. 9Zecommendation: Adopt the resolution authorizing execution of an ACC which provides $280,415 annually and $1,402,075 over a five year period from HUD for Section 8 voucher housing payment assistance and administrative fees. (The resolution will be available Monday evening.) ~~ Basis of Recommendation: 1. HUD has offered an allocation of budget authority for housing assistance. 2. HUD is cooperating in providing Richfield an independent program given funds that are presently available to them to distribute. 3. Metro HRA is cooperating in assisting Richfield in implementing an independent program, including administrative financial consultation. 4. 379 Richfield households are at risk of losing housing assistance benefits unless they move elsewhere in the Metro HRA system. 5. Partial independence sets a precedence for future allocation and support. 6. Partial independence provides additional administrative revenues, although not enough to offset all HRA contributions to date. Alternative Recommendation: The HRA may choose to not authorize the ACC and withdraw from administration of the Section 8 in Richfield. However, if that course was selected either 379 clients would have to relocate from Richfield or the HRA and City Council would have to authorize the Metropolitan Council to assume all administrative responsibilities. Decision Mode: If authorized the executed ACC would be returned to HUD immediately. Lease-Up could begin once the other documentation is completed and submitted to HUD. Tentatively, the documentation is to be prepared by September 30, 1988. A special HRA meeting on or before September 30, 1988 will be required to re-authorize a working relationship with Metro HRA. Respectf lly submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP:sae i CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA HRA Letter Igo . 3333 September 19, 19813 Issue Statement: Referral of redevelopment plan for the 70th Street and Penn Avenue Redevelopment Project to the Planning Commission. Bacikground: On August 29th, the HRA approved an agreement with Dr. Donald Johnson. The land transaction contemplated by the agreement must be done within the context of a redevelopment project. A redevelopment project is established as a result of actions by the HRA, Planning Commission and City Council on a redevelopment plan. Attached is appropriate of a redeye pages 3 and Activities" Activities" the proposed redevelopment terms of the agreement and lopment plan. The essence 4, "Description of Anticip and "Description of Antici Recommendation: Authorize the transmittal by staff of the 70th and Penn Avenue Redevelopment Project Plan to the Planning Commission with a request that they make a finding as to the conformance of the plan with the Comprehensive Plan. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The HRA has approved the developer's agreement with Dr. Johnson. 2. For the transaction to be completed a redevelopment project must be established. 3. Referral to the Planning Commission is a necessary part of the process of establishing a redevelopment project. Alternative Recommendation: Not authorize transmittal. Decision Mode: If a referral is December before delay would push made on September 19th, it will probably be mid- the land sale to Dr. Johnson can take place. A the sale into 1989. Resp c fully submitted, Jam D. Prosser Cit Manager plan. It simply takes the places them in the context of the plan is described on ated Private Development gated Public Development JDP:sae ii Draft No. 3 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for The City of Richfield Redevelopment Plan for the 70th Street and Penn Avenue Redevelopment Project (Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive) Prepared by: The City of Richfield Department of Community Development Housing and Redevelopment Division 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 5542.3 .. rr ~_~~ MAYOR Steven J. Quam CITY COUNCIL Martin Kirsch Edwina Garcia Ivan Ludeman Michael Sandahl HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Thomas Harms, Chair Joan Helmberger Donald Hassenstab Vern Luettinger Ivan-Ludeman PLANNING COMMISSION Connie Murray, Chair Nancy Edwardson Barbara Kritzman Robert Jensen Charles Kauth Russell Kennedy Leon Lunas Robert Nelson Thomas Ohnesorge CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR James Prosser . / .- ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Redevelopment Plan for the 70th Street and Penn Avenue Redevelopment Project PAGE A. Statement of Public Purpose ......................... 1 B. .Statutory Authority ................................ 1 C. Description of Redevelopment Project Area .......... 1 D. Statement of Goals and Objectives .................. 2 E. Development Activities and Agreements .............. 2 F. Proposed Land Use .................................. 4 G. Acquisition, Relocation and Rehabilitation Activities ....................... ................ 4 H. Environmental Considerations .............. 4 ......... I. Redevelopment Plan Modification .................... 5 J. Administration of Redevelopment Project ............ 5 Appendix A: Budget 6 .. T' 7 / / Redevelopment Plan for The 70th Street and Penn Avenue Redevelopment Project A. Statement of Public Purpose It is found that the public interest requires neighborhood replanning to redevelop and remedy conditions of underutitlized land; that in order to foster and facilitate the growth of the City's commercial base, it is necessary to encourage private enterprise to engage in the redevelopment of land which is to be constructed in accordance with a comprehensive community plan. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota (HRA), and the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota (City), have determined that public intervention is necessary in the 70th Street and Penn Avenue Redevelopment Area for the conveyance of tax-forfeited land to remedy conditions of under-utilized land and physical blight which the private market has not been willing and/or able to accomplish independently. B. Statutory Authority The statutory authority for the undertaking of a redevelopment project in the 70th Street and Penn Avenue Area and the redevelopment activities proposed in the redevelopment plan relating thereto is conferred upon the HRA pursuant to and in accordance with the Economic Development Act, Minn.Stat., Sec. 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended. Specifically, Minn.. Stat., Sec. 469.027 establishes the requirements for redevelopment plan preparation by an HRA prior to undertaking property acquisition and redevelopment. C. Description of the Redevelopment Project Area In order to guide the development and redevelopment in the 70th Street and Penn Avenue Area, the HRA has created this redevelopment plan. Pursuant to Minn. Stat., Sec. 469.002, sub. 12, the proposed project meets the definition of a redevelopment project, defined in Minn. Stat., Sec. 469.002, subdivision 14, and will henceforth, be referred to as the redevelopment project. The redevelopment. project area boundary encompasses all that real property within an area described as follows: The parcel boundaries for Lot 13, Block 10, Tingdale Brothers Lincoln Hills Second Addition and Lot 10, Block 10, Woodlake Highlands Addition, except the coterminous boundary line which separates the two lots. -1- a, ~~a D. Statement of Goals and Objectives The HRA determines that it is necessary, desirable, and the public interest to undertake a redevelopment project in City pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat., Chapter 469. HRA determines that the funding of the necessary activities improvements in the redevelopment project area shall be accomplished through the use of a private lending source by developer and application by a governmental subdivision for conveyance of tax-forfeited lands. (Refer to Budget.) in the The and the The following goals and objectives are intended to serve as a basis for guiding the development/redevelopment of the proposed redevelopment project area: 1. To acquire land or space which is vacant, unused or underused. 2. Utilize the vacant, tax-forfeited land more intensively. 3. Facilitate the redevelopment of land for a contemporary professional office building. 4. To achieve a high level of design and landscaping quality to enhance the physical environments. 5. To create effective transitional planning between residential and non-residential uses. 6. Eliminate an impaired condition which could detract from the health of the community. 7. To improve the property tax base of the City and other taxing jurisdictions. 8. To provide increased employment opportunities and improve the income tax base of the state. 9. To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the city and other local jurisdictions, for development by private enterprise. E. Development Activities and Agreements The objectives of this Redevelopment Plan will be accomplished pursuant to the authority granted to the HRA by the Economic Development Act, Minn. Stat., Sec. 469.001, et sec. Redevelopment within the project area must be financially feasible, marketable and compatible with long range development plans of the City and HRA. -2- .. T' 1. Description of Anticipated Private Development Activities The proposal for redevelopment of the project area calls for the construction of a new office building and related surface parking to be situated on vacant, tax-forfeited land which has been underutilized for a number of years. Specifically, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority would acquire the tax-forfeited land from the County and convey the land to a private developer. The anticipated construction will be initiated and completed during 1989. The office building will be utilized for non-retail office purposes, approximating 3,800 square feet. Landscaping will be utilized to increase the aesthetic appeal of the office building and protect the neighboring residential area. Any and all proposals by the developer will be reviewed by the HRA to determine conformance with the redevelopment plan and applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan; construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings; landscaping plan; grading and storm drainage plan; signage system plan; and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the HRA to demonstrate the conformance of the development with the redevelopment plan. Land acquired by the HRA will be subject to a contract for sale upon disposition to the developer. The general requirements to be imposed upon the developer by the contract for sale are: 1. To redevelop the land purchased in accordance with this redevelopment plan; 2. To commence and complete the building of improvements on the land within specified periods of time; 3. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of the HRA; and 4. Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, or national origin on the sale, lease, transfer, or occupancy of the land purchased from the HRA. 2. Description of Anticipated Public Development Activities The proposed public development activities in the redevelopment project area would be undertaken by the HRA and City in order to support the private development activities and facilitate redevelopment of the area in a manner suitable to overall development plans. These activities include acquisition of the tax-forfeited land by the HRA from the County and conveyance to the developer contingent upon mutual agreements set forth in the Contract for Redevelopment. -3- .. 7/ / ~ / F. Proposed Land Use An ordinance providing for the rezoning of redevelopment project area to C-1, Neighborhood will become effective 30 days after publication ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation G. Acquisition, Relocation and Rehabilitation 1. Acquisition the proposed Business District of the rezoning for the area. activities The HRA proposes to acquire the following tax-forfeited property in order to convey the land to the developer for redevelopment according to objectives set forth in this plan: Parcel Identification Address: 6941.-45 Penn Avenue PINS~~ 28-028-24-33-0159 Legal Description Lot 13, Block 10, Tingdale Brothers Lincoln Hills Second. Addition, Hennepin County, according to the recorded plat thereof; and Lot 10, Block 10, Woodlake Highlands Addition, Hennepin County, according to the recorded plat thereof. 2. Relocation No relocation or displacement will occur as a result of the proposed development project. 3. Rehabilitation Pro ram No rehabilitation is intended in the Redevelopment Project Area. H. Environmental Considerations It is anticipated that the proposed redevelopment project will not present any permanent environmental problems. All municipal actions, public improvements, and private. development shall be carried out in a manner that will enhance, rather than detract, from the natural environment. All necessary environmental permits and clearances will be obtained. -4- .. n fry I. Redevelopment Plan Modification Pursuant to Minn. Stat., Sec. 469.029, subd 6, a redevelopment plan may be modified at anytime provided that the HRA and City Council adopt such modifications upon the notice and after the public hearing required for the original adoption of the redevelopment plan. If the HRA determines the necessity of changes in an approved redevelopment plan or approved modification thereof,-which changes do not alter or affect the exterior boundaries, or do not substantially alter or affect the general land uses established in such plan, then such changes shall not constitute a modification of the redevelopment plan nor require approval by the governing. body of the political subdivision in which the project is located. J. Administration of Redevelopment Project The Redevelopment Project will be administered by the HRA. -5- .. ~`"% PENN AND 70TH BUDGET Administrative (staff time, legal counsel) $ 6,287 Soil Borings 2,750 Land Acquisition/Closing Costs 25,802 Total $34,839 -6- ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA HRA Letter No. 32 September 19, 1988 Agenda Issue Statement: Designation of an HRA member as liaison to the PASSS Advisory Committee. Background: The HRA recently authorized staff to pursue the preparation of a strategy for improving the Penn Avenue/66th Street area. At the August 29, 1988 meeting, an Advisory Committee composed of 27 business and residential representatives was established. A survey of the membership is in progress to determine a day and time for meetings. The committee by-laws provide for liaison. members from the School Board, HRA and City Council. Recommendation: Designate a person to serve as HRA liaison to the PASSS Advisory Committee. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The HRA should be represented on the Committee. Alternative Recommendation: Not have a liaison person. Decision/Decision Mode: It is likely that the first meeting of the committee will be held in early October. JDP:sae Respectfu y submitted, James D. Prosser City Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA HRA Letter No. 31 September 19, 1988 Issue Statement Authorization to extend Energy Program Agreements. Background• Since 1985, the City has contracted with Northern States Power (NSP) and the Self Reliance Center (SRC) to provide residential energy conservation services. The agreement with NSP has expired. The agreement with SRC is due to expire later this month. The HRA assumed the City responsibility for program administration in 1988. Therefore, the HRA is being requested to authorize extension of the agreements. The purpose of the NSP agreement is to implement energy conservation programs as required by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC). NSP is required to contribute financial assistance to local units of government that form Community Energy Councils (CFCs). For Richfield, the HRA is the CEC. The agreement between NSP and the HRA provides approximately $40,000 to pay the cost of residential energy audits. Since the NSP agreement has no specific end date, it provides the opportunity to fund audit services for a period in excess of the next year unless .the MPUC determines otherwise. Each audit costs approximately $105. NSP pays $95 and the participating households (NSP customers) are charged $10. The audit helps homeowners make energy conservation decisions, and allows them to be eligible for assistance programs that the HRA and other agencies offer. The purpose of the SRC agreement is to deliver audit (evaluation) and housedoctor (weatherization) services. The audit is called the "Home Energy Checkup" (HEC). For the $105, SRC's trained personnel evaluate the building, heating system, insulation levels, household electrical consumption, and life style of the residents. Approximately $20 in weatherization materials are also provided free. Senior citizens and lower income residents benefit from a slightly longer audit which includes the installation of some of the free weatherization materials. Lower income residents also benefit from the housedoctor service which SRC provides. Housedoctoring, the reduction of air infiltration by detecting bypasses and weatherizing, costs $420 for each house. CDBG funds pay for the total cost of housedoctoring for households with incomes at or below 50 percent of the area median income ($14,250 to $26,850 depending on family size). During the past year, SRC has provided approximately 400 audits and 15 housedoctor services. The agreement remains basically the same as previously utilized. The agreement requires the HRA to identify, and SRC to perform, approximately 45 audits a month during October, 1988 through March, 1989. During the remainder of the contract period (April through September, 1989), lesser numbers would be completed on a resident requested basis, consistent with a drop in demand following the end of the heating season. A total of 315 audits are anticipated and NSP has sufficient revenues to fund this amount. With approximately $17,000 available in CDBG funds, housedoctor services can be provided through December, 1988. More housedoctor services will be available in 1989 if a funding source is available. Recommendation: 1. Authorize the agreement with NSP beginning October 1, 1988. 2. Authorize the agreement with SRC for energy conservation services during the period October 1, 1988 through September 30, 1989. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The present agreements ,have or are about to expire 2. Authorization will allow the energy program services to continue uninterrupted into the upcoming heating season. 3. Legal counsel has previously reviewed the form and content of the agreements and there are no significant changes. 4. SRC is familiar with the Richfield Audit and Housedoctor program, and remains one of a few contractors with the knowledge and ability to provide both energy audits and housedoctor services. Alternative Recommendation: Not approve the extension of agreements with NSP and SRC. Decision Mode: If the extensions are authorized, the agreements would be executed to provide uninterrupted service. Respectfully submitted, Jame D. Prosser City Manager JDP:sae 'T°~ ~.~ RESOLUTION N0. THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RELATING TO PROVIDING ENERGY AUDITING AND WEATHERIZATION SERVICES WHEREAS, the Home Energy Checkup (HEC) Program, funded by Northern States Power (NSP), and the House Doctor Program, funded by Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), are important elements of the HRA's "Bundle Up Richfield" energy conservation program activities. WHEREAS, the Self Reliance Center (SRC) is a qualified contractor with the knowledge and the ability to provide both HEC Audits and House Doctor Services. WHEREAS, the existing SRC agreement will expire on September 30, 1988 and an extension has been negotiated; and WHEREAS, NSP has an interest in continuing to fund energy conservation services in Richfield. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield as follows: 1) The Executive Director and Chairperson are authorized to execute the agreement between the HRA and Self Reliance Center, Inc. to provide HEC Audits and House Doctor weatherization services to Richfield residents starting October 1, 1988, and continuing through September 30, 1989. 2) The Executive Director and Chairperson are authorized to execute the agreements between the HRA and NSP to continue funding energy conservation services in Richfield. Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 19th day of September, 1988. Thomas E. Harms, Chairperson ATTEST: Joan Helmberger, Secretary ~/ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA HRA Letter No.30 September 19, 1988 Agenda Issue Statement: Authorization to execute contract with South Hennepin Vocational Technical School (Vo-Tech) to initiate a 1988-89 New Home project. Background: Vo-Tech has requested that the HRA participate in a new construction project for the school year 1988/89. The two organizations have participated together in 11 projects since 1977. The projects benefit both parties. They provide rehabilitation and new construction training opportunities for the Vo-Tech students and affordable housing at reduced cost for the HRA. This will be the second new construction project wherein a structure will be built at the Vo-Tech campus, moved to the site, and placed on a permanent foundation. On August 17, 1987, the HRA authorized staff to acquire the property at 6840 Humboldt Avenue through the Voluntary Acquisition Program. During the interim, staff has arranged for property maintenance and developed project plans in cooperation with Vo-Tech architectural drafting faculty. The new house will have approximately 1430 square feet of finished living area. It will feature a split entry design, four bedrooms, one and 3/4 bathrooms, a living room, separate dining area, unfinished space on the lower level for a family room, a deck adjacent to the dining area, and a 16' x 20' driveway and 20' x 20' parking pad with access from 69th Street. The new construction contract requires: -the construction of a permanent foundation at 6840 Humboldt Avenue. -the construction and relocation of a split entry style house to 6840 Humboldt Avenue from the campus. -the installation of heating, electrical and plumbing systems. -interior finishing; floor coverings, millwork, painting and staining. -completion by October, 1989. The amount of the Vo-Tech contract for the new construction project is not to exceed $56,501. The estimated project costs, with reference to ..funding source, follows: ~`'~ / -/ Activity Acquisition, site Demolition, site Vo-Tech Contract: Landscaping Curb Cuts Legal (sale) . Closing Costs Funding Source $41,400 CDBG $ 3,175 CDBG $56,501 Proceeds of Sale $3,000 Proceeds of Sale $1,200 CDBG $ 600 Proceeds of Sale $2,500 Proceeds of Sale $108,376 The major elements of the contract include: -Supervision of labor and insurance coverage to be the responsibility of Vo-Tech. -Vo-Tech is responsible for a one year warranty for defects caused by faulty workmanship or defective materials, a two- year warranty on installation of plumbing, electrical, heating and cooling systems, and a ten-year warranty on structural defects. (This warranty is required by state law). -A provision specifying Vo-Tech's responsibilities for house moving that ensures all permits have been secured, and that all Richfield city departments are notified far enough in advance of the move to minimize disruptions to area residents. -A provision specifying the Vo-Tech's responsibilities concerning timely completion of the exterior facade, and routine site maintenance during the construction period. Contractors continue to complete the electrical, plumbing and heating portions of the work. Legal counsel has previously reviewed the contract requirements. A copy of the floor plans and building elevations accompany this letter. The home will be sold to a first time homebuying family of four to eight members having a moderate income (as determined by Section 8 income limits) of between $25,000 and $40,500. Although the completed value of the home has not yet been determined by independent appraisal, staff estimates that the value should approximate $85,000. The initial purchase price would more closely approximate $68,000 and a second lien would be used to recover any difference. The proceeds of sale are utilized to pay the contract. It is anticipated that a reduced interest rate mortgage would be secured from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in the summer of 1989, if available. FHA financing is an accceptable alternative pending mortgage interest rates at the time. r/-~. Recommendation: It is recommended that the HRA adopt the attached resolution authorizing the execution of the Vo-Tech contract in the amount of $56,501, for the 1988-89 new construction project at 6840 Humboldt Avenue. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The site has been cleared and is ready for development. 2. Plans have been developed and reviewed by staff to meet program needs of the HRA. 3. The inspection division has had an opportunity to review the plans for the project. 4. Site development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and can occur without a variance. 5. Adjoining neighbors have all indicated they anticipate no problem and welcome the development Alternative Recommendation: Do not authorize execution of the Vo-Tech contract. This would delay development which could prohibit the Vo-Tech from including the project in their 1988-89 curriculum schedule. Decision Mode- The Humboldt project will be started on campus later this month. Contract execution would occur immediately to avoid delays in project development and to ensure that construction is initiated according to the approved plans. Respectfully submitted, Jame D. Prosser City Manager JDP;sae ~ / - a„s HRA RESOLUTION N0. THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RELATING TO VO-TECH AGREEMENT FOR 6840 HUMBOLDT AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) acquired the real property at 6840 Humboldt Avenue South, legally described as: Lot 9, Block 2 Woodlake Highlands Addition and; WHEREAS, a project has been proposed in cooperation with South Hennepin Vocational Technical Center (Vo-Tech); and WHEREAS, the property at 6840 Humboldt Avenue South would be developed with new construction; and WHEREAS, the agreement price for the new construction project will not exceed $ 56,501; and WHEREAS, following completion of the new construction work the property would be sold to a first time home buying, moderate income family. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota that the HRA Chairperson and Executive Director are authorized to enter into a construction agreement for an amount not to exceed $56,501 for the new construction project at 6840 Humboldt Avenue South. Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 19th day of September, 1988. Thomas E. Harms, Chairperson ATTEST: Joan Helmberger, Secretary „/-~ u J D i ®o~ ~~ ~~ , . ,, .' I s. Z O Q W J W z O W J W F W J W J W a W ^ W J W a is W J a U O H O z ~~ a 3 R'- o'' i -<< _ _ ~~ P~ I ~ -- `F~~ 3 II,T/,~~r~ ~ ~ ~rV,Vyc ~~ capper. ~ ~ T -, J ~ ~ ~~ v~n~yL - L , , . ~' `z ~~ ~~ ~r ' 4 11(( ~ ~ \ I _A45 _ N L'L N / ~Lo _ ~ ~ G~L'ST - v ('~ ~T. ~1(~'C _ ~. .. y ;~ ~~ o~~ ;, ~E~- 4~ .. a~ ~ Hr !! ~J I --- v l N V E L ~l O (/)~ r2, .... I _ _ ~-~-" I ~r ~ . _ NOT TO SCALE r ,; a ~M r 1 ~j S c~ i «~~ Q fl -- ~-;-~ _ -_-- -- o - -, _ r - ~ -~- 1 ~ w ~teir ~~ _ Cf~ R Pc T P'~3 `~ vtN~re. I . J Q l~N~ ~ ~% ZQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ IIN ~i NtSFTL= ~9 .., ~ -.- C~4~Pc-r ~ ,ronh:l[ ~ : j" ~ IN - --~ ~• - j l UNFINt~,I-I~;~ _ ~ n ~v p ~, ~~" 1~RAGF Ut~pefE d ~ ~ r~ ~ 1 ~ - -- ~ - .. Y _~ Y _~ _ ~. _. I ~ i D II _ _ _ _ ~ 4'_ n•, 1 ~ W FPS . L,~E L. ~~,Q41~_ ~__1~13.1~ _ _ _ -- NOT TO SCALE