2-26-90 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 67
Agenda, February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Receipt and referral of Rich Acres petition for Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Redesignation.
Background:
On February 21, 1990, City officials received a petition from
Rich Acres residents. (Copy Attached). The petition essentially
requests redesignation of land use in New Ford Town and
development of a reuse plan for that area. This matter had been
previously considered by the Planning Commission and City
Council. The City Council and the Planning Commission decision
not to include Rich Acres in a land use redesignation was based
on two factors:
e A majority of the New Ford Town neighborhood is in the Ldn
65 and 70 noise contours. No homes within Rich Acres are
within either the Ldn 65 or 70 contours.
e Resident interest in redesignating the land use in Rich
Acres did not appear to be as strong as resident interest
expressed by New Ford Town residents. This latter factor
appears to have changed.
Recommended Motion:
Refer the petition to the Planning Commission and request that
they conduct a public hearing as soon as possible to consider the
redesignation of land use in New Ford Town. Direct staff to
initiate a feasibility study for land reuse within New Ford Town.
The cost for such a feasibility study is estimated at $1,500.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The residents concerns regarding the future residential
character of this area appears to be significant.
2. Conducting a public hearing would permit an opportunity for
additional facts to be considered regarding this a proposed
redesignation.
3. Undertaking a feasibility analysis may provide additional
information to the Council prior to a final decision
regarding this matter.
4. Finally the most important factor. Residents are greatly
concerned regarding the future of this area, it is
appropriate to provide a expeditious review of 'their
request.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Do not conduct public hearing.
2. Wait until a redesignation prior to initiate a feasibility
analysis.
Decision/Discussion Mode:
This matter will be presented at a Council meeting February 26,
1990. It should be noted that if a redesignation is approved by
the Planning Commission it will be necessary to seek Metropolitan
Council approval prior to final action by the City Council. This
requirement will take at least 30 and possibly an additional 60
to 90 days. This is the same process that occurred with the New
Ford Town redesignation.
Re e "ly submitted
Jam D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:sae
•
r?
•
P E T I T I O N
To: The City of Richfield, Minnesota
James D. Prosser, City Manager
Steve Quam, Mayor
Council Members: Edwina Garcia
Martin Kirsch
Ivan Ludeman
Michael Sandahl
From: The Rich Acres Residents of Richfield, Minnesota
We, the undersigned residents of Rich Acres, by signature
of this petition express the following concerns regarding
our neighborhood :
1. That our neighborhood faces the same problem as
New Ford Town residents: increasing isolation in a
noisy, commercial area no longer suited for residential
purposes.
2. That our neighborhood has been neglected by the City of
Richfield as to future planning while New Ford Town
residents are well being considered with appropriate
zoning provisions and plans for redevelopment.
3. That if New Ford Town is redeveloped, Rich Acres
property would become highly undesirable. We do not
want to live in a neighborhood that is an island among
commercial industry.
We want Rich Acres to be a part of any redevelopment plans
which involves New Ford Town. After a number of years of
uncertainty about our neighborhood, we have the desire to
be bought out (either with the New Ford Town redevelopment
or independently) so that we (and our families) can finally
get on with our lives.
N e Address Phone.
3 - aG r'L`
4. ?? -
5.
Date
;? -IS-50
-2 -SS-- Sp a
r ??? S-?o ?f •K
•
•
Petition to the City of Richfield
From the Residents of Rich Acres
Page 2
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
C
?- Address Phone Date
4 !?3 ?- o hie, S n4 -s6&i J-i4
to 22* Ss IJ Z-17-10
83.5 026-4 61F S. &oI -cV IF ,1-/7-9
?S;)j
1 L- f 41.
14
?/
0*0?
61
y?3
,q
S
o - ov Lim
i,0
I•
•
Petition to the City of Richfield
From the Residents of Rich Acres
Page 3
Name address
30 . -/ -
31.t Y t y k?
32.
33. i?tc 4 ?r? C
34. Ica .?/? L, z? ?PJZ
35. '
36 . Q3
37. 90,) 6 SO/?-, - ? X35/ l
39.
40. `
41.
42.
43-
i
44.
45.
46. > A-? 5W A AJZ pit/ l?
47. eve ?v e S A ,v 50A-1 G
48.
491" 6,ho, izlyz
50.
52.
53.
Phone Date
KL4;?')all -7190
2 aJ? ?l
at-17-?c
7a-
?? 2 J?
,may ys
Y
5-37/ 3
s4?2
3
_S
0
•
Q
Petition to the City of Richfield
From the Residents of Rich Acres
Page 4
54.
55.
56.
57.
q-q?'?1 ? -1?3?p
58.
r 0 861-
59.
61. qrZ2
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
Name Address Phone Date
SUMMARY OF PETITION
54 Homes In Rich Acres Neighborhood
42 Homes Wish to be Bought
Homes Not Represented By This Petition
6824 20th Avenue Home presently for sale by owners.
6800 21st Avenue Home presently vacant and for sale.
6810 21st Avenue Home is rental property. Unable to make
contact with landlord.
3 Homes - Not home. Unable to make contact with: 6820 19th Ave.
6821 19th Ave.
6821 Longfellow
6820 20th Avenue Do not wish to be bought.
6838 20th Avenue Do not wish to be bought.
6844 20th Avenue Do not wish to be bought.
6832 21st Avenue Do not wish to be bought.
6824 19th Avenue Do not wish to be bought.
6835 19th Avenue Do not wish to be bought.
cc: Mr. Alfred Checchi, Chairman and CEO, Northwest Airlines
Mr. Jeff Hamill, Executive Director, Metro'. Airports Comm.
Mr. Steve Keefe, Chairperson, Metropolitan Council
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 72
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Delay renewal of the On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor license
for The Frenchman's, 1400 East 66th Street, until March
12, 1990.
Background:
The application for the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating
malt liquor license has been submitted by The Frenchman's. The
required license fee has been paid.
The public safety investigation has been conducted and revealed
the following:
- The applicant has submitted the required liquor liability
insurance coverage.
- The applicant has paid all general real estate, state
sales, and withholding taxes.
- Mr. Charles Cordray is the owner since June of 1989, Ms.
Christine Cordray is the manager. Neither has a known
• criminal record.
- During the previous twelve months there were 25
public safety contacts with the Frenchman's. This
compares with nine contacts for the previous year. Of the
25 contacts, five were of a criminal nature and
six were "bar type" including two drunkeness,,three
domestics, and one disorderly conduct.
- Public Safety staff received a complaint in January of
1990 which indicated that there was a possibility that
minors were being served beer at the establishment. On
January 5, 1990 and again on January 26, 1990, police
officers were present as employees of Frenchmans served
two minors on separate occasions without asking the
minors for identification. Both employees and the owner
of the establishment were charged on February 12, 1990
with a gross misdeameanor.
Recommended Motion:
1. Delay the license renewal of the on-sale non'-intoxicating
malt liquor license for The Frenchman's until March 12,
1990.
2. Schedule a disciplinary.hearing for March 12, 1990 to
consider renewal of their license and possible suspension
of the license for a period of up to 60 days for serving
beer to minors.
0 3. Consider granting an extension of the license to sell 3.2
beer until the March 12, 1990 hearing.
Basis for Reommendation:
1. The applicant has violated provisions of both the city
code and state statute pertaining to the sale of 3.2
beer.
2. Based upon information gathered by staff and an
investigation conducted by the Public Safety Department,
there is a valid reason to delay the license renewal
until the March 12, 1990 Council meeting.
3. At the March 12, 1990 Council meeting, the Council will
need to consider the possibility of suspending the
establishment's license for up to 60 days based on the
allegations that two employees served beer to minors
on two separate occassions in the presence of Richfield
police officers.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the
license. Any suspension or revocation must, according to
Minnesota State Statute 340A, be based upon a finding
that the licensee has failed to comply with an
applicable statute, rule or ordinance pertaining to
0 alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee
has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under
Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure
Act. The City Attorney advises that we need a two week
notice before conducting a disciplinary hearing.
Public Safety recommends the license renewal be delayed until
the March 12, 1990 Council meeting so that the owner of
Frenchmans can be notified of a hearing on the license renewal.
The hearing will be to address a possible suspension of the
license as a result of minors being served in the establishment
on two separate occasions.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A request for the delay of a license renewal for Frenchmans until
the March 12, 1990 Council meeting is presented for Council
consideration at this time.
Resp lly submitted,
Jame . Prosser
Cit anager
0 JDP:bac
•
Public Safety Contacts
9
1 9 R.
25
Of the 25 contacts in 1989, *four were of a criminal nature.
Those four consisted of 1 disorderly conduct, 1 stolen property,
1 bad check and 1 vandalism.
*It should be noted that the council letter indicates there were
five contacts of a criminal nature - That should be corrected to
four.
3
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 71
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Approval of the•continuation of the agreement with the City of
Bloomington for the provision of inspectional services for
Richfield for the year 1990.
Background:
The City of Bloomington has provided inspectional and enforcement
services in the areas of plumbing, heating and air conditioning,
food service, forestry and plan check for food services for
several years. In the 1989 contract with Bloomington, we added
to those services listed above the following:
- Public outdoor swimming pool inspections (apartment
buildings, municipal pools, lodging facilities)
- Indoor swimming pool inspections (schools, heal clubs)
- Lodging facility inspections (motel/hotel)
The contract amount will increase from $70,674 in 1989 to
$101,000 in 1990. This increase is necessary due to a change in
the term of the contract from 12 months to 14 months. The
expiration date of the contract in the past has been October
31st. The 1990 contract date will reflect an expiration date of
December 31, 1990. ,
The second factor in the increase of the contract is a result of
an internal audit conducted by Bloomington which indicated that
several areas of the contract were not cost effective to the City
of Bloomington. The services involved are food and
restaurant sanitation inspections, environmental health plan
check inspections and plumbing inspections.
Richfield and Bloomington staff have met to discuss these
increases and Richfield has decreased the amount of time the
plumbing inspector spends in Richfield resulting in a savings
to Richfield of approximately $5,000. After careful
consideration by staff, it was determined that even with the
increase in the contract, Richfield could not provide the same
level of services for the amount of money Bloomington is
requesting.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends that the city council approve the agreement
with the City of Bloomington for the provision of inspectional
and enforcement services for the year 1990.
0
1`,/mil _/
Basis For Recommendation:
1. The City of Bloomington has sufficient resources to
provide a professional level of inspectional services to
Richfield residents. Annual evaluations of their services
has shown that they are providing effective services in a
very cost-efficient manner.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The council could decide to have Richfield provide its own
plumbing, heating and air conditioning, food inspection
and forestry services. The cost of hiring the staff
necessary to provide the same level of services and
administrative support would be more than our current
expenditures, and would require a budget increase.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The renewal of the agreement between Richfield and the City of
Bloomington for the provision of inspectional services is being
presented for council approval.
Respectfully submitted,
James Prosser
City nager
0 JDP:bac
is
•
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 70
Agenda February 26,.1990
Issue Statement:
Resolution amending Letter of Understanding between the City of
Richfield and James D. Prosser, City Manager, adjusting
compensation.
Background:
Mayor Quam?has requested that a resolution adjusting the
compensation of the City Manager be placed on the February 26,
1990 Council agenda. The current salary of $71,510 was effective
September 1, 1989.
Attached is a resolution that would increase the manager's salary
6%, 4% pay structure adjustment and 2$ merit increase. In
addition, the City Manager's deferred compensation contribution
by the city will be increased by 1$, for a total of 5$.
Recommended Motion:
None
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item has been placed on the February 26, 1990 city council
agenda for council consideration.
James
City
JDP/eja
y submitted,
Prosser
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND
JAMES D. PROSSER, CITY MANAGER
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
The following sections of the Letter of Understanding
between the City of Richfield, Minnesota and James D. Prosser,
dated July 14, 1986, is amended as follows:
Section 5, Salary: Employer agrees to pay employee for his
services rendered pursuant here to an annual base salary of
$75,800, effective September 1, 1989, payable in installments at
the same time as other employees of the employer are paid.
Employee shall also receive a 1$ increase in deferred
compensation.
Each January 1, the City will annually adjust the City
Manager's salary by adding an amount equal to the difference
between the maximum annual amount contributed by the City for
Management employees toward the family cost of health and dental
insurance coverages, and the total annual family premium costs of
these insurance coverages.
In addition, employer agrees to increase said base salary
and/or other benefits of employee in such amounts and to such
extent as the Council may determine that it is desirable to do so
on the basis of an annual salary review of said employee on or
about August 31 of each year.
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 69
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Adoption of a Resolution Approving Minnesota Department of
Transortation Plans for a Storm Sewer Replacement Project.
Background:
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) owns an
existing storm sewer which drains part of I-35W near 63rd Street
to an inplace, city owned storm sewer main at 63rd Street and
Dupont Avenue South.
This existing storm sewer is adequate in capacity, line and
grade, but is rapidly deteriorating.
MnDOT is proposing to replace two hundred five feet of this
deteriorating storm sewer with new,pipe. The replacement pipe
will be of the same size as the existing pipe and will be
installed in the same location and to the same grade at the
existing pipe.
Most of the length of this improvement will be situated on
private property. MnDOT has been working directly with the
owners of the Woodlake Apartments,.6300-04 Dupont on easement and
construction details. City staff has contacted representatives
of the owners, Highland Property Management, and are satisfied
that the owners concerns are being addressed by MnDOT.
The Richfield staff has been dealing with MnDOT to assure that
the interests of the City are provided for. The issues resolved
include detours, street curb and gutter and sidewalk restoration,
and the protection of inplace public utilities.
The cost of this improvement will be fully funded by MnDOT.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the construction plans and special provisions for the
storm sewer replacement project at 63rd St. and Dupont Avenue
South (S.P. 2782-247).
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The existing pipe is rapidly deteriorating and if left as
is will eventually collapse causing unsafe conditions
affecting both vehicular and pedestrian traffic, as well as
damage to both private property and city streets.
2. The cost of this improvement will be fully funded by MnDOT.
3. The Owners of the affected private property have been
contacted and are working with MnDOT to minimize
inconvenience to their property.
0 4. All Richfield staff concerns over this project have been
adequately addressed by MnDOT.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may decide not to adopt a resolution approving the plans
for this project. A City Council decision not to approve this
resolution would stop this needed project and could result in
severe damage to inplace improvements both public and private.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for the February 26, 1990 regular City
Council meeting. Staff is requesting approval at this time in
order to submit the approved resolution in a timely fashion.
RespectfJc[1Jly submitted,
Jame P. Prosser
City anager
JDP/sdr
Attachment
•
0
0 RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR A STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT AT
63RD STREET AND DUPONT AVENUE SOUTH.
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation for the State of
Minnesota has prepared: plans, special provisions, and
specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 394,
renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 35W, within the corporate limits
of the City of Richfield, located on 63rd Street at Dupont
Avenue; and seeks the approval thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special
provisions for the improvement of said Trunk Highway within said
corporate limits of the City, be and hereby are approved
including the elevations and grades as shown and consent is
hereby given to any and all changes in grade occasioned by said
construction.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 26th day
of February, 1990.
APPROVED
0 Steven J. Quam Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 68
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Public Hearing and Second Reading of transitory ordinance
providing funding for certain capital improvements from the
Special Revenue Fund.
Background:
On December 6, 1989, the City Council approved the 1990 Capital
Improvement Budget (CIB) and also adopted the 1990 budget for all
funds as outlined in the budget document. The various approved
appropriations for 1990 for the capital projects are defined as
outlined below:
Master Park Plan Study $ 30,000
Veterans Memorial Park 245,000
City Hall Sprinkler System 15,000
City Hall Utilization Study 10,000
$300,000
A transitory ordinance is now necessary to finalize these
appropriations pursuant to City Charter. Charter Section 7.12,
Subdivision 2 allows expenditures for capital improvements from
the Special Revenue Fund only by ordinance.
Recommended Motion:
Hold the public heariang and approve the attached transitory
ordinance providing for the expenditure of funds from the Special
Revenue Fund for certain capital improvements.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. On December 6, 1989, the City Council adopted the 1990
Capital Improvement Budget.
2. On February 12, 1990 the City Council held reading and
scheduled the second reading and public hearing for
February 26, 1990.
2. Under Section 3.09 of the City Charter, a transitory
ordinance becomes effective 30 days after publication of
the second hearing notice. The hearing process must be
completed in 1990 so the Capital Projects can be completed
as approved and the funds expended.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The City Council could allocate the funds to a totally new
project or projects, but a public hearing for a budget
revision would be necessary.
2. The City Council could decide not to authorize the
expenditure of Special Revenue Funds. However, that would
be contrary to the previously adopted Capital Improvement
is Budget.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Action on this item is requested at
the City Council. This would allow
effective in a timely manner so that
be ordered as budgeted.
JDP : ej a
•
the February 26 meeting of
the ordinance to become
the capital improvements can
Respectfully submitted,
/t
Jame Prosser
City nager
0
BILL NO.
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM
THE SPECIAL REVENUE FOR
CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and
expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue
Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2
hereof, for which the City would be authorized to issue general
obligation bonds.
Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures
for such improvements which are authorized to be paid from the
Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, Subdivision 2 of the
City Charter, are as follows:
Master Park Plan Study $ 30,000
Veteran's Memorial Park 245,000
City Hall Sprinkler System 15,000
City Hall Utilization Study 10,000
$300,000
Section 3: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made
pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by
Council action.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
_ day of February, 1990.
Steven J. Quam Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
• BILL NO.
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM
THE SPECIAL REVENUE FOR
CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and
expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue
Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2
hereof, for which the City would be authorized to issue general
obligation bonds.
Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures
for such improvements which are authorized to be paid from the
Special Revenue Fund under Section 7.12, Subdivision 2 of the
City Charter, are as follows:
Master Park Plan Study $ 30,000
Veteran's Memorial Park 245,000
City Hall Sprinkler System 15,000
City Hall Utilization Study 10,000
$300,000
Section 3: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made
pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by
Council action.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
_ day of February, 1990.
Steven J. Quam Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
0
y
•
NOTE:
At first reading of this ordinance, a question was raised
regarding use of special revenue funds for non-recreational
improvements.
Attached is a ten-year history of the use of these funds.
•
•
?e ? v
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Memorandum
DATE: February 20, 1990
TO: James D. Prosser, City Manager
FROM: Steven L. Devich, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Special Revenue Capital Funding Analysis
1981-1990
The following report on Special Revenue Capital financing is
divided into four parts:
1) Policy
Attached is a copy of the City's Capital Improvement Budget
Policies adopted by the City Council. Policy A9 refers
specifically to liquor revenue (Special Revenue)
expenditures.
2) Capital Improvement Budgeting History
A graphic comparison of the last ten years of Capital
Budgeting using Special Revenue (SR) funding. The chart
shows total SR funding and breaks it down into park and
non-park projects by total dollars and percentage of total.
3) Special Revenue Funded Non-Park Projects By Year
A listing of non-park projects funded by SR funds from 1981
through 1990.by year.
4) Capital Budgets
Attached are the Capital Budgets of the City for the period
1981-1990.
SLD•ff
cc:? Jean Mitchell, Finance Manager
??, %41,
•
SPECIAL REVENUE (SR)*
CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETING
1981-1990
YEAR
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
* Special Revenue Funding is generated by Liquor profits.
** 1981 was unusual in that the current year's SR Funding
available was used in addition to most of the Fund balance.
TOTAL SR
FUNDING
$605,000**
388,250
300,000
330,000
350,000
315,000
341,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
SR FUNDED
PARK PROJECTS
AMT/$ OF TOTAL SR
$155,000 / 26%
206,250 / 53%
109,000 / 36%
227,500 / 69%
330,000 / 94%
280,000 / 89%
260,000 / 76%
240,000 / 80%
300,000 /100$
275,000 / 92%
SR FUNDED
NON-PARK PROJECTS
AMT/$ OF TOTAL SR
$450,000 / 74%
182,000 / 47%
191,000 / 64%
102,500 / 31%
20,000 / 6%
35,000 / 11%
81,000 / 24%
60,000 / 20%
-0- / 0%
25,000 / 8%
•
•
•
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDED NON-PARK PROJECTS BY YEAR
1981
Ice Arena $ 25,000
Swimming Pool 20,000
Forestry 45,000
Sidewalks 10,000
Central Garage 28,109
Gov't Bldgs. 30,000
Pub. Safety Bldg. 291,891
1982
Forestry $ 45,000
Pub. Safety Bldg. 130,000
Energy Imp. 7,000
1983
Forestry $ 25,000
Ice Arena 35,000
Penn Fire Station 71,000
City Garage 15,000
Energy Imp. 45,000
1984
Forestry
Swimming Pool
Central Garage
$ 27,500
15,000
60,000
1985 1986
City Hall $ 10,000 City Hall $ 20,000
Energy Imp. 10,000 Public Safety
Comm. Reserve 15,000
1987
Nature Center $ 29,000
Ice Arena 12,000
Swimming Pool 10,000
Public Safety
Comm. Reserve 30,000
1988
Optech Voting
System $ 60,000
1989 1990
None City Hall
Sprinkler
City Hall
Util. Study
$ 15,000
10,000
11
property taxes, which distribute the costs of municipal
services fairly and which provide adequate funds to
operate desired program.
7. To provide essential public facilities and prevent
deterioration of the City's public facilities and its
capital plant.
8. To protect and enhance the City's credit rating and
prevent default on any municipal debts.
9. To ensure the legal use and protection of all City
funds through a good system of financial and internal
controls.
10. To maintain a Risk Management Program that will
minimize the impact of legal liabilities, natural
disasters or other emergencies tnrough the following
activities:
Loss Prevention - Prevent negative occurrences.
Loss Control - Reduce or mitigate expenses of a
negative occurrence.
Loss Financing - Provide a means to finance losses.
Loss Information Management - Collect and analyze
relevant data to make prudent loss prevention, loss
control and loss financing decisions.
III. FINANCIAL MANASEMENT POLICIES
A. Capital Improvement Budget Policies
• 1. The City will make all capital improvements in
accordance with an adopted Capital Improvement Budget.
2. The City will develop a multi-year plan for capital
improvements and update it annually.
3. The City will enact an annual Capital Budget based on
the multi-year capital improvement plan. Future capital
expenditures necessitated by changes in population,
changes in real estate development, or changes in
economic base will be calculated and included in Capital
Budget projections.
4. The City will coordinate development of the Capital
Improvement Budget with the development of the operating
budget. Future operating costs associated with new
capital improvements will be projected and included in
operating budget forecasts.
5. The City will use intergovernmental assistance to
finance only those capital improvements that are
consistent with the adopted capital improvement plan and
City priorities, and for which operating and maintenance
costs have been included in operating budget forecasts.
6. The City will project its equipment replacement and
maintenance needs for the next several years and will
update this projection each year. From this projection,
a maintenance and replacement schedule will be developed
and followed in the Central Garage Fund.
7. The City staff will identify the estimated costs and
potential funding sources for each capital project
proposal before it is submitted to the City Council for
approval.
B. The City will determine the least costly financing
method for all new projects.
9. The City will utilize profits from its municipal liquor
operation solely for the support of capital'
improvements. Each year at least $325,000 of available
current year liquor store profits will be transferred to
the Special Revenue Fund for capital improvements. Any
remaining profits will be retained in the Liquor Fund as
working capital for the maintenance and expansion of
physical assets, including store facilities. The
accumulation of funds in working capital will be
reviewed annually by the City Council.
B. Revenue Polices
1. The City will attempt to maintain a diversified and
stable revenue system to shelter it from short-run
fluctuations in any one revenue source.
2. The City will estimate its annual revenues by an
objective, analytical process.
3. The City will project revenues for the next three years
and will update this projection annually. Each existing
and potential revenue source will be reexamined
annually.
4. The City will maintain sound appraisal procedures to
keep property values correct. Property will be assessed
at the legally mandated market value for each type of
property.
5. The year-to-year increase of actual revenue f;om the
property tax will generally not exceed eight percent,
except in unusual conditions. Reassessments will be
made.of all property at least every four years.
... ::.r'?A L' .. a. ww a.wqq ••},? ? '?e•.?w.
,r.NK tF.,(?J,:CaMtl?.'A t+.',t. SiLrlYY?/t,oYY7rOtii7Y -- ti" -?.{ /
tjr1 G,JM
IMA'1: d
3
iI
.
?"
G
?i"lrN 3.uti?«!+r = T is{ -? - .
`?t"`?:`> ?
E 1:IL
1Aq•i.lai
V.
4..1??1
.??Y.. ?I
.M.L W4
rl
°' arri.. ?xJ..?ln•.jq
IO.s""•:- lp,?r ?r??ty?_,te:,' "? 'a R ?,.H K?.+ ?yrap.t,?!
??yy "C is•
MK 1:=?NAr1Mi.?
T??'
? +
.
._
:?atu Jtr1.KtJ't, LLt•, w • • 1 4 - ,? • _ t !t" F.
,
tYpM9 l
+
t1
1
'
'
.
• : Y
+rr"-
"i..w,.. yr, NS ,n•••". ,7u,r
?
• t
R.M
'.??
Ma.
'r! Ito, F 1
R1
MlYeYYyi". ?.
it Q/L
4iii7?
.s??:
iv cr
ot'.•
w
a s?:r?
! l
?
w+11
?- .w...w wr.•M.iw?w.??.r'?wr r.M4
.• ?
D
?
`
i?
,-
- •L:
? _.,,.. `. ? ,NT?`'. "t -'1`y _ - 4t .w: a??_ ••; `:fit ' 4X W;`{
', ruR.MY a.i.w lkr tr..» ..wiw..r. lalretas...w ' " . aNr•YN ,ws;.0'. a?Lua? wa.n.ew Mw wi: x+.a7ard? rfrxW, wt .
?rf g-a t i t . t? ", . i 41f t€ 1 i j`?C!'t ?81 R ?(? ?y???'1?1A NEy£l igntd"[Y]tA?.? f l-2i7 F.a: t 1
F ItT rC ,!„ . ,/ L,Y Y[1L i?iY Or?.L U'J FTMS S
r•rrL? a . _ ... t .r?i{t•C_-.L.iri't" ?!VI"au?lktil.an ?»t ..q.. v. )?tti ta. 7t. a 3 :v _
-t'-
,
?w^ r . -,,.?a Project Project _-
rr Balance - Revenues Expenditures Balance.
Pro es _12131%80 ' 1981 1981` t 12/31/81
Recreational and Open ---
r1 .. . -1.c'i. i[t ti-riYi t it•.?i'3'•„-,i a' 7 ,'.. :',rp.?, ,.- -
Space Development+,r .t..,, r? .r wctf t , 1 M _.
t; >
"N
C
ommunity. Center' $,! 102,000FG ..'$ ..1029000 $, -
`s Ice. Arena ".r t . , tx? ? t?,c-ct. ,7 ,?:e =•
:` r ? "??AISA' 15,000SR '25,000
Swiaaaing Pool'" 0,000SR :-:_,: 20,000 --
M t tr^ J r VI w 4
Rich Acres Park M ,€ 50,000SR 50;000 "
Monroe/Fairwood Park .., ' - *0,000SR 40,000
Legion Lake. Park - 10, OOOSR 10, 000
Park Land Acquisition:' 55,000SR 30,000 25,000
Forestr
y i = - .,:45.000SR 45,000
Total
Recreational Development t,+ '
p $ 347,000 -322 000 25 000
Right-of-Way Improvements
Sidewalks $ (1,000) J+m: 10,000SR $ 195,000 $(1,000)
160,000MSA
• 25,000SAB
Street Lighting-Arterial 180,000SAB 180,000
Traffic Signals 1-35/76 50,000P "70,000 - _
20,000MSA
Alleys (10,000) 475,000SAB 465,000
Storm Sewers 1,000,000SAB 1,000,000
Lyndale Ave. 64th-67th Streets (80,000) 519,000FAU 761,473
205,298MSA
117,175FG
Lyndale Ave, 67th-494 (1,000) 37,000MSA 48,000
12,000SAB
66th St.-Grand to 1-35 (100,000) 967,000C 1,515,000
473,000MSA
17-5 OOOFG
Total
Right-of-Way Improvements 192 000) $4,425,473 $4,234,473 $(1,000)
Public Facilities
Central Garage (28,109)" 28,109SR
General Government Buildings p (20,000) 30,000SR . ,. :: 10,000
Public Safety Building .-_? 208,109RS .800,000•
291, 891SR
Total __='
3: n
Public Facilities' "- 48 109)V $ 858,109 $y? 810,000'
Total Projects s' rS5 366.473 X24,000.
$5.630.582
_ : t. .. .. N N -tac eta r_ f.ty' YR. '4Y' .."1"L`tc.+ r. ?•:, .it
' r . a n •: • rr•??s-+ 4 1"C>•tlLtW.XttPl:.,r^1T:V R ?wt 1 'itlY'. '
. SF -crr .u3 s r_ctrv_s-•tr t{n's?l xr tt• r-.;?%^-ct":- r'Y:?~
K 1 r
n ? rtiii:ry f? t
( ,i r ?;f- •? t
'. Z " tr 7hJr ! w -4Y;? `/1' ,: tm{R ?py +,.1 ,, .Tl t..;'. •t F ?` ao i' } Y ....T ti,?::f-.i,. .•1 fj??:r r? t?F. ??. :~J?:irln.. ?tr>. '-tA"
r ec , i :?tr;?rs•.MrA.T?S;?/t°RS ML S a F 3*rtW11,1%
y,'?4 qtr c
0
t
L
e
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA C-2 ANNUAL BUDGET
........?.: a?wl.:•.w• •.•+"•. . 1,+.:. nvrawYww.Rtr-ynn vwdw .-•••, •
.. ...•s,,,sve.rw.r-r?ararrrr.x-•, w•v..»,rr. •.rr ri usu.:...,. r
-
B7UDGET. SUMMARY
•+.. t • Lr L? , -e= a K i16P',>sis?sfS"!Y!' ii,?7b!P..t :.L.t1t l lni.r: ?'??Q Y ISL•li+ : ?:• '...... ?:. '^:....'L. = r ..•=,:it? .-Ti'=..? •=? ? ?'. .=
. a. L'r w-' . ?«• •• •_•• .?i'. ~$' i ?7 ?t T ..'Wif. yYt .Et.ex>•I' nid(' ?+7•Err#:a..w i+ roc,. -4 oVa- A+wc 'r
ecreation- and Open Space bevelopment
Tr•?Y`?^`L?"^,FSS'i"'?l'.L' i . .5• OQQ?`?'?'u.'?
Richr Acres .Park 4 .; 4a;ritx{ rr•v?ai ?z+xi s,as x$,aw sY r o . _. a ?...a ?.=y.
:.11.•A. L-LYMd't?N+.4fivh.L•?,:M:?ctSL?ttii•lL2r-= K '[ri'UY-'f;t•r'71i?. ?S.?cu6..F iP, t7 .r ';.r ,
i PaikT ?• 1?. ,.t' ?? 9'i' mmumm' R` 143,750?SG s! 0,000
-S
:Sw;?e',3 ?,3.ru? vif3'ti?3v:a.a«F 'Ka,i.T.art?3'lr'?1'3Q?000 RS y f?lTUrs
1 b =rx iVH53?L.. VYiV?Siilriz9i!•.ifs't/ Mrlti'+63+pirJ'::3+?3rYFi+•'WJOr?E!.iFi"'ir'R!,-4R•,+ii. •?=/?' r-? ?.
•?•^•••'?'T-^ l-••_. •?•?-Zf' Lr7V 1TLt.. L.TF3 i•rC. •4-i F .rOV.,+?r. 43,.3.4
a y • ? . r K •r?asz ullT?rsk? 5+-t+Ftier..t^Ktu?'st>4 v?t+rr?? ? +•r• r.:xN;,?-r??rs-•.^ ?r? r . ?- n•• s :x????K. ? .•+?srlnrQ r
Community,Center--Elevatot-
cquisition
s Park Land A 000
Y ?.
45' 000' c
• Pores try W. ?F r ,%t,5? ,.s. a -• ,4?-.+ - . AR.. F.
r r t s;
Ice Arena Improvements 2,000',
_ .?
' Total Recreational jDevelopment 525,000 ?S 105,000' 3
T* 7
4 a•re. xiM,cy,l jn-r e n Yw e.- x `: r
Right-of-Way Improvements
136,000 MSk. Sidewalks 170,000
34, 000 SAB
Alleys ..;. 400,000 AB _ 400,000
Lyndale Avenue 74th to 494 = .50,000-MSA 50,000
Adams Hill Storm Sewer
•- _ 100,000 OF 98,000
Traffic Signals I-35/76th Street - 50,000 P 50,000
Total Right-of-Way Improvements $ -7709000 $ 768,000
Public Facilities:
<t
Public Safety Building $ _.°.130,000 SR,.:$ ' .50,000
-45 000 RS._
Water Plant Roof .120 - - - , 000 B _ 120, 000
Well #4 12, 000 OF 12, 000
Lime Slaker :•35,000 OF ':- 351000
:Lift Station #Z 0,000 OF 50,000
-.t 5
Energy Improvements
-7 , 000 ..SR:
Total Public Fatc?I tjt? mprovements.;t _ ;_:?,?. w. 399 ,000 $ 267,000
+ '+.`', :_?.:p ,.. pk."3fJY.`,,CIiK'Ai?iu'sSkttl?r.?rt?ff?l-i"rci$•r7t-. 4 ?+?"y,Fh'tQws?.?r'Ar -I r" w-t,.-..s....?.a.,. La•+"'?'. .?.
.. 1 -'3LTcf[?G'M?l?3K?i.'{ ?•.I.uliia?M• +r? ?t?"s' 4 ?KAleu+ ?, ' .. ?.3!; T, e, t 66
Total Projects 594 0 S1? 140Y:000
? ?.wsRw? +?..s?_ 1? ,r '• ?.. .., gTL•'7la ivy 't .J3flr +' .Y 9NS?17Cf L'.:^:
.L. -LSS ? d?iL YILY:!?7Fk?c?F'•'•a ? it{L• v r ?.
;,? s F e s er''x+? f r.,
• .• I- S',. 1 r -` ??•t• N.?F L i It tu.Y aaa kY? W(.i Yr+•yr?1+
" SPecial Revenues'.. {SR`s X388 2'50 State Grants rrSG ';`so max..;.,r
uF 4Z
a:":?trv_.s.aa+?ar Qi{3ss?yar.?+?r..J??'wsie? ?y7P!i!MSe.?`.'"?Si!!'.??S+.r_•!?
{ } ' a.•
?.. tal ;?s"tuna ?;a:???:?--? - . _ _- ? - ?''' _...?,??.•,.•s.? '
i.e •A
1
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
1983
Projects
Recreation and Open Space Development
Richfield Lake Pathway System
Park Land Acquisition
*Forestry
Lincoln Hills Park
Memorial Park - Fanning
ice Arena Improvements
. Total Recreational Development
Project
Revenues
$ 105,000 SG
15,000 SR
180,000 SAB
30,000 SR
-25,000 SR
54,000 SR
10,000 SR
• - -35.000 SR
454 000
Project
Expenditure.,
$ 300,000
30,000
25,000
10,000
35,000
400,000
Right-of-Wav Improvements
Sidewalks
Alleys
Traffic Signals, 76th Street/I-35W
Storm Sewer Improvements
Penn/66th Street Area Parking Lots
Traffic Study, 76th Street and Penn Area
Total Right-of-Way Improvements
Public Facilities
Public Safety Building
n"2enn Fire Station Improvements
-City Garage Improvements
Well No. 5 Replacement
rgy Improvements
Total Public Facility Improvements
TOTAL PROJECTS
$ 100,000 MSA
50,000 SAB
180,000 SAB
50,000 P
10,000 MSA
100,000 OF
150,000 SAB
10,000 MSA
650,000
$ 75,000 RS
114,000 RS
=-71,000 SR
5,000 SR
20,000 OF
0`45.000 SR
340,000
Al
ESTIMATED 1983 REVENUES BY SOURCE
Special Revenues (SR)
State Grants (SG)
Special Assessment Bonds (SAB)
Municipal State Aid (MSA)
Revenue Sharing (RS)
User Fees (UF)
Private (P)
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES
$ 150,000
180,000
60,000
100,000
150,000
10,000
650,000
$ 75,000
185,000
15,000
20,000
10,000
305.
11.355.000
$ 300,000
105,000
560,000
120,000
189,000
120,000
50,000.
11,444,000
Cr" or :1c14ruLD. "INNISpTA C 1
ANNUAL =l1DG"
-/- /J
BUDGET SUrY
CAPITAL M-PROW NT FUNDS
1984
Project
PROJECTS Revenues
Rereational and Open Space Development
*-, orestry oft-X279500 SR
Park Land Acquisition 33,000 RS
Memorial Park 200,000 ER
,
Lincoln Hills Park 000
17 SR
37,000 RS
Legion Lake 0,500 SR
--ewimning Pool Boiler -45,000 SR
Total Recreational Development $ 437,000
Right-of-Way Improvements
Sidewa s
Alleys
Traffic Signal 76/I-35W
Storm Sewer Improvements
Traffic Study 76/Penn
Total Right-of-Way Improvements
Project
Expenditures
$ 27,500
33,000
297,000
54,000
10,500
15,000
$ 437,000
$ 133,000 MSA $ 140,000
7,000 SAB
100,000 SAB 100,000
50,000 P - - 60;000 - -
10,000 MSA
100,000 OF ' 100,000
10,000 NSA 10,000
$ 410,000 410,000
Public Facilities
Infrastructure Study $ 10,000 RS $ 10,000
Water Meters 287,000 OF 287,000
Water Filters & Controls 80,000 OF 80,000
Public Safety Communication Reserve 30,000 RS 30,000
Fire Vehicle Reserve 40,000 RS 40,000
amity Garage Furnace/Roof!?60,000 SR 60,000
Total Public Facilities $ 507,000 _ ?507vOOO
TOTAL PROJECTS $1,354,000 $1,354,000
ESTIMATED 1984 REVENUES BY SOURCE
Special Revenues (SR) 3309000
State Grants (SG) 97,000
Special Assessment Bands (SAB) 107,000
Municipal State Aid (MSA) 153,000
Revenue Sharing (RS) 150,000
User Fees (UF) 467,000
Private (P) 50,000
Total Estimated Revenues $1,354,000
MY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA C 1 - ANNUAL BUDGET
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPIT - 1 r S
1985
Project
PROTECTS Revenues
Rereational and Open Space Development
Forestry -- $ 25,600 RS
x;700 ;SR
Park Land Acquisition 36,400 RS
Legion Lake Park IM-30C
12,200 SG
Little Bob's Park fi0;000-SF
Parking Lots/Drives g74000M;
(Lincoln Field and Donaldson Park)
Total Recreational Development $'-04,0
Right-of-Way Improvements
Alleys
Storm Sewer Improvements
Traffic Study 76/Penn
Penn/66th West
Longfellow/66th-69th
Frontage Road 69t1h-24th Avenue
RSA Strom Sewer
Market Plaza Sidewalk
66th/Pillsbury Signal
Crosswalk Replacement
Total Right-of-Way Improvements
Public Facilities
Water Meters
;.pity Hall Improvements
Well #4 Replacement
w-+aergy Improvements
Fire Vehicle Reserve
Public Safety Communication Reserve
Total Public Facilities
TOTAL PROTECTS
$ 100,000 SAB
100,000 OF
10,000 MA
545,000 MSA
146,000 SG
10,000 SAB
123,000 GS
180,000 SAB
25,000 SO
60,000 P
30,000 SAB
1,329,000
$ 274,500 OF
25,000 RS
;OOO-R
18,000 OF
O==
45,000 RS
30,000 RS
412, 0
$2,145,700
Project
Expenditures
$ 30,300
36,400
260,500
50,000
27,000
$ 404,2M
$ 100,000
100,000
10,000
545,000
156,000
123,000
180,000
25,000
60,000
30,000
1,329,000
$ 274,500
35,000
18,000
10,000
45,000
30,000
412,5M
$2,145,700
ESTIMATID 1985 REVENUES BY SOURCE
,Special Revenues (SR) $ 350,000
State Grants (SG) 281,200 -
Special Assessment Bonds (SAB) 345,000
Municipal State Aid (MSA) 555,000
Revenue Sharing (RS) 162,000
User Fees (UF) 392,500
Private (P) 60,000
Total Estimated Revenues $2,145,700
CITY OF RICHFIELD. MINNESOTA
C-1
*- 7/;
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPITAL MP. VII01 1 FUNDS
1986
PROJECTS Project
Revenues Project
Expenditures
Rereational and Open Space Developme nt
Forestry $ 25,000 SR $ 25,000
Park Land Acquisition
Legion Lake Park 15,000 RS 15,000
725,000 SR
425,000
Nature Center
Improvements 200,000 SG
15,000 SR
15
000
Parking Lots/Drives
(Lincoln Field and Donaldson Park) 159000 SR ,
15,000
Total Recreational Development S 495,000 $ 495,000
Right-of-Way Improvements
Alley s
Storm Sewer Improvements $ 150,000 SAB
1,700,000 OF $ 150,000
1
700
000
Penn/66th West 356,500 NSA ,
,
1,238,000
525,000 FAU
Frontage Road 69th-24th Avenue 356,500 HC
175,000 SG
350,000
25 , 000 SAB
66t",.-Sherdian/Xerxes 150,000 NSA
143,500,MSA
1,080,000
584,500 FAU
2&4,500 HC
67,500 E
Total Right-of-Way Improvements $4,518,000 4,518,000
Public Facilities
City Hall Cooling Tower
Water Meters $ 10,000 RS $ 10,000
ft-A-City Hall Improvements 50,000 OF
,000 SR 50,000.
20 000
Sludge Dryer
Well #? Replacement 432,500 OF 432,500
Energy Improvements 18,000 OF
10,000 RS 18,000
10
000
Fire Vehicle Reserve
*,ww,.- Public Safety Communication Reserve 30,000 RS
000 SR
X5 ,
30,
30,000
, 30,000
15,000 RS
Total Public Facilities $ 00,500 $ 00
500
TOTAL PROJECTS 35,613,500 ,
$5,613,500
ESTIMATED 1986 REVENUES BY SOURCE
Special Revenues (SR) S
State Grants (SG) 3159000 *User Fees (iJF) $2,200,500
375,000-- Edina (E) 67,5002?tio? S
Special Assessment Bonds (SAB) 175.,000 v Hennepin county (HC) 641,000
Municipal State Aid (MSA) '650,000 Federal Aid Urban (FAU)
Revenue Sharing (RS) x;000` 1,109,500--
Total Estimated Revenues
$5,613,500
*Those projects supported by User Fees are also a part of the individual
enterprise fund capital outlay.
CITY OF RICNRMA MINNESOTA C-1 ANNUAL BUDGET
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
1987
Project Project
PROJECTS Revenues Expenditures
Recreational and Open Space Develop ment
Forestry $ 25,000 SR $ 25,000
Park Land Acquisition 28,000 RS 28,000
195,000 SR' 195,000
Legion Lake Park 40,000 SR 40,000
w-• .Nature Center Improvements .... a29, 000 SR 29 , 000
+. -ce Arena Improvements -.r -12,000 SR 12,000
o- +Swimming Pool Improvements `.. 40,000 SR 10,000
Golf Course Improvements 13,600 OF 13,600
Community Center Improvements 12,000 CDBG 12,000
Total Recreational/Open Space $ 364,600 $ 364,600
Rieht-of-Wav Improvements
Alley Paving $ 295,000 SAB $ 295,000
Storm Sewer Improvements 32,700 OF 32,700
Reconstruct Frontage Roads 88,000 SG 275,000
33,000 SAB
154,000 MSA
ILN Phase 1, Traffic Improvements 4,186,960 TIF 5,299,950
583,000 MSA
529,990 SG
Total Right-of-Way Improvements $5,902,650 $5,902,650
Public Facilities
Water deters $ 65,000 OF $ 65,000
Sludge Dryer 452,500 OF 452,500
po public Safety Communication Reserve r 0,000 SR 30,000
Well #6 Replacement/Repair 18,000 OF 18,000
Loop Dead Ends 33,000 OF 33,000
Replace High Service Pumps 20,000 OF 20,000
Backwash Reclaim Pump 26,000 OF 26,000
Sanitary Sewer Station Alarms 22,000 OF 22,000
Total Public Facilities $ 666,500 $ 666,500
TOTAL PROJECTS $6,933,750 $6,933,750
ESTIMATED 1987 REVENUES BY SOURCE
¦
Special Revenues (SR) $ 1,000
Revenue Sharing (RS) ` 28,000
State Grants (SG) 617,990
*Users Fees (UF) 682,800
Total Estimated Reveunues
*Those projects supported by User
Enterprise Fund capital outlay.
Municipal State Aid (MSA) $ 737,000
Comm Dev Block Grant (CDBG) 12,000
Special Assessment Bonds (SAB) 328,000
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) 4,186,960
$6,933,73-0
Fees are also a part of the individual
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
C-1
ANNUAL
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
1988
PROJECTS
Recreational & Open Space Development
Park Land Acquisition
Veterans Memorial Park
Total Recreational/Open Space
Right-of-Way Improvements
Boulevard Retaining Walls
ILN Street Improvements
Total Right-of-Way Improvements
Public Facilities
OPrECH III Voting System
well #1 Replacement/Repair
Loop Dead Ends
Replace High Service Pumps
Total Public Facilities
TOTAL PROJECTS
Project
Revenues
$ 30, 000? R'
210,000'R;
-200-; 000 -S--
$ 440,000
$ 20,000 M
2,446,000 T
750,000 M
100,000 S
$3,316,000
0 60,000 R
20,000 U
30,000 U
20,000 U
$ 130,000
?'? AP9 nnn
Project
Expenditures
$ 30,000 R
210,000 R
200,000 S
$ 440,000
$ 20,000 M
3,296,000 T
$3,316,000
$ 60,000 R
20,000 U
30,000 U
20,000 U
$ 130,000
$3,886,000
ESTIMATED 1988 REVENUES BY SOURCE
Municipal State Aid (M) $ 770,000 Tax Increment Financing (T) 2,446,000
.Special Revenue (R) 300,000: *Users Fees (U) 70,000
State Grants (S) 300,000
Total Estimated Revenues $3,886,000
*Those projects supported by User Fees are also a part of the individual
Enterprise Fund capital outlay.
111 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA C- 3 ANNUAL BUDGET
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
1989
PROJECTS Project Project
Revenues Expenditures
Recreational 8 Open Space Develo ment
Park Land Acquisition- w-- S 270,000 R S 270,000 P
Master Park Plan Study 30,000 R 30,000 R
Golf Course Road/Parking Lot 58,740 U 58,740 U
Total Recreational/Open Space $ 358,740 $ 358,740
Right-of-Way Improvements
66th Street Bus Turnaround $ 40,000 F $ 40,000 F
Total Right-of-Way Improvements $ 40,000 $ 40,000
Public Facilities
Replace High Service Pumps S 20,000 U S 20,000 U
Storm Sewer improvements 10,000 U 10,000 U
LHN - GOBAL 100,000 T 100,000 T
Total Public Facilities S 130,000 $ 130,000
TOTAL PROJECTS $ 528,740 S 528,740
ESTIMATED 1988 REVENUES BY SOURCE
Special Revenue (R) 3300,000
Users Fees (U) 88,740
Federal Grants (F) 40,000
Tax Increment Financing (T) 100,000
Total Estimated Revenues S 5281740
*Those projects supported by User Fees (U) are also a part of the individual
Enterprise Fund capital outlay.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
I
C-3
ANNUAL SUDGET
7
•
•
BUDGET SUMMARY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
990
PROJECTS Project Project
Recreational b Open Space Develooment Revenues Expenditures
Park Land Acquisition $ 35,000 R $ 35
000 R
Veterans Memorial Park 245,000 R ,
245,000 R
*Golf Course Regulation Greens 33,000
17,500 D
U 33,000
17
500 D
U
*Golf Course Irrigation 10,000 U ,
10,000 U
Total Recreational/Open Space S 335,500 S 335,500
Right-of-Way Improvements
I/L/N Right-of-Way acquisition
Emergency Vehicle Preemption $ 600,000
40
000 M
M $ 600,000
4 M
Portland/66th Intersection ,
750,000
C 0,000
750,000 M
C
250,000 M 250,000 M
Total Right-of-Way Improvements $1,640,000 $1,640,000
Public Facilities
City Hall Sprinkler System 15,000 R 15
000 R
City Hall Utilization Study 10,000 R ,
10,000 R
Total Public Facilities $ 25,000 S 25,000
TOTAL PROJECTS $2,000,500 $2,000,500
ESTIMATED 1990 REVENUES BY SOURCE
Hennepin County (C)
Donations (D)
Municipal State Aid (M)
Special Revenue (R)
User Fees (U)
$ 750,000
33,000
890,000
-300,000
27,500
Total Estimated Revenues
•
$2,000,5100
*Those projects supported by User Fees (U) are also a part of the individual
Enterprise Fund capital outlay
C-4
0 Issue Statement:
Public Hearing and
Chapter XX, adding
Skates".
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 66
Agenda February 26, 1990
Second reading of an ordinance amendment to
Section 2025 - "Skateboards and Roller
Background:
Because of•the skateboard activities in the Hub Shopping Center
and in public areas of the Richfield Pool, Ice Arena, various
tennis courts, Community Center and Nature Center, staff has
prepared an ordinance regulating the use of skateboards,
rollerblades, roller skates and roller skis in certain areas.
Both the Hub Merchants Association and Richfield citizens have
asked for assistance in regulating the use of these devices in
shopping areas, where pedestrians are endangered and private
property becomes damaged from these activities.
The Community Services Department has also requested that tennis
courts, the entrance/sidewalk areas at the Pool, Ice Arena,
Community Center and Nature Center be included in this ordinance
in an effort to reduce risk to people and city-owned facilities
by the use of these devices.
The proposed ordinance addresses these concerns and imposes
certain restrictions on the operation of these devices during
nighttimes, on state highways, careless/reckless or negligent
operation, yielding of the right of way, and attaching to any
vehicle upon a roadway.
Many cities, both nationwide and in Minnesota, have adopted
similar ordinances, and the one proposed here reflects the best
from these existing ordinances.
Recommended Motion:
Approve second reading of an ordinance amendment to Chapter XX,
adding Section 2025 - Skateboards and Rollerskates.
Basis for Recommendation:
This ordinance should effectively provide the public and local
merchants with a tool that can protect both pedestrians and
property, and can enhance the safety of those using the devices.
Alternative Recommendation:
Not approve second reading of this ordinance amendment/addition.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Public Hearing and second reading was scheduled for the
February 26, 1990 City Council Meeting.
Res ec ully submitted,
Jame . Prosser
City anager
JDP:ws
)JAN 18 '90 10:10 HOLMES & GRAVEN
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XX
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE
OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter XX of the Ordinance Code of
?? the City of Richfield entitled
Misdemeanors„ is hereby amended by adding the following new section.
For
or upon or to control the operation of
uOd. Z. On the private
f the owner or oceuoan'
ubd. 3. On private pro
ie operation of skatebo
abd. 4. On all public to
3laeent to the municip
ature Center_
es.
ter and Woodlake
VM4/Y. J. yit aul PUDIIC areas wnere SIKBS have bee
council resolution rohibitin the operation of skatebo:
Subd. S. On any state highway located within the city.
Section 2025 - Skateboards and Roller Skates.
•
JAN 18 '90 10:11 HOLMES & GRAVEN
is street, sidewalk
8.
f7-
period.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnsota. This
day of , 19_.
Steven J. Quam, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0 RC150-405
P.4 f
,go--
!O -
Subd 10To fail to yield the right of way to any vehicle upon entering upon
any roadway.
Subd 11. To attach the skateboard or roller skates or the person of the
operator to any vehicle upon a roadway.
;P-
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 65
Agenda, February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Second Reading and Public Hearing of an Amendment to Chapter XI,
Section 1100, Subsection 1110.03 of the Ordinance Code of the
City of Richfield.
Background:
The Legislature repealed Minnesota Statutes 624.42 through 624.54
during the 1989 session. Those provisions required dance hall
operators to be licensed by local units of government and set out
the mechanism for the licensing and regulatory activities of the
local unit of government.
The City Code references that statute as the source of authority
for its public dance/dance hall ordinance and also for all
matters not specifically addressed in the ordinance itself.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the revised dance hall ordinance .
Basis for Recommendation:
1. Because the existing ordinance is directly tied to the
repealed statute, it is probably no longer',enforceable.
2. The Legislature, on the other hand, did not repeal
Minnesota Statute 412.221, Subsection 27, which gives
the Council authority to license and regulate the
operation of public dance halls and the conduct of
public dances.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council may deny the request to revise Subsection
1110.03 and decide not to license and regulate dance halls and
public dances.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
If the ordinance amendment is approved on February 26, 1990, it
will become effective 30 days after publicatioon, or
approximately March 30.
Respect ly submitted,
Jame Prosser
City anager
0 JDP:JDE/lmv
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER XI
SECTION 1100, SUBSECTION 1110.03
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD
CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter XI, Section 1100 of the Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield is hereby
amended by amending Subsection 1110.03 thereof to read as follows:
1110.03. Subdivision 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Subsection,
"public dance" means a dance which is or may be attended or patronized by the
public generally, ?ither with or without tickets or the charging of admission, and
where the object is, and the proceeds thereon are, to be devoted to other than
benevolent, fraternal, educational or charitable purposes. The term "dance hall"
means any room, space or place in which a public dance is to take place. The
terms above defined shall not include a public dance being conducted on premises
for which a Tavern License has been issued and is in effect pursuant to Subsection
1210.07, Subd. 4 of this Code. --
Subd. 2. Permit Required. No person may keep, maintain, conduct or
operate any public dance hall or place for holding public dances in the city without
first paying the permit fee and obtaining a permit. Perms sha-H be fsqued by the
ei-ty pursuant to -the atitherity granted 4n Wnnesei a 6tattAes; Seet4ens 6$442 to
624:54:
Subd. 3. Duration of Permit. Permits issued in accordance with this
Subsection shall authorize the permittee to hold public dances in the city during
the period of one calendar month from the date of the permit.
Subd. 4. Application. Permits shall be applied for on forms provided by
the city and shall be issued at or before the last regular meeting of the council in
the month preceding the month in which the dance is to be held. The application
shall enumerate the days on which dances are to be held and permits issued
therefor shall permit the holding of dances on such enumerated days only. The
permit fee shall accompany the application.
Subd. 5. Permit Fee. The permit fee is fixed by appendix D.
Subd. 6. Conditions Governing Issuance. The following conditions shall
govern the issuance of permits under this Subsection. --(a) Permits shall be issued only if the remises are located within a
commercial C-2 or PC-2 or industrial districts of the City.
(b) Permits shall be issued only to applicants who are free of convictions for
offences which, in the opinion o the City, directly relate to the permitted
(c) Permits shall be issued only to applicants who are of good character and
reputation.
(d) Permits shall not be issued, if in the opinion of the City, the conduct of
a public dance at the proposed location would be likely to have an adverse
effect on the public health, safety or welfare.
(e) Permits shall be issued
only to applicants who can
demonstrate, to
- the
satisfaction of the Cit that the a lieant possesses adequate liability
insurance, insuring applicant from claims or property damage, personal
injury, or death occasioned by or arising out of the conduct at the public
dance.
Subd. 7. Approval and Issuance. The council shall review and act on each
application. If a permit is anted the clerk shall granted issue a permit authorizing the
applicant to hold public dances in the n t e city, at the place and on the days specified in
the permit.
Subd. 8. Additional Dances. Additional dances may be held from time to
time during the permit period by a permittee upon his a fee of $2.00
paying and
obtaining approval of the clerk for each additional dance.
Subd. 9. Intoxicating Liquor. No person may bring to or sell, dispense,
give away, use or drink intoxicating liquor or non-intoxicating liquor as defined in
this code in any public dance hall or
Y P place for holding public dances in
the city
unless the ermittee also possesses a currently
valid license permitting he
t sale and
consumption o such beverages on the remises o the public dance. This previ i
does net prevent the eensxmptien }ntewiea+ft Rquar er nen4ntex%ieet}ng Mauer
as defined in this eede en the premises having a tavern i}eense and a Heense under
Seetiens 1299 at
Subd. 10. Conditions of Permit. The permit is issued subject to the
following conditions.
(a) No erson shall dance, nor shall any Person to whom such permit is
issued permit or suffer any person to dance in any public dance hall any
indecent or immoral dances or an dance which is characterized by
immodest motion of the bod . No rson shall in an public dance hall act
or speak in rude, oisterous, obscene, or indecent manner, nor s 1 any
person to whom a permit has been issued suffer or permit any person to so
act or speak therein-
(b) Every public dancing place shall be brightly illuminated while in public
use and dance therein while the lights are extinguished, dimmed or
turned
low, so as
to give imperfect illumination, is hereby Prohibited.
(c) No person to whom a permit has been issued shall permit to be' or remain
in an public dance lace an intoxicated erson an Prostitute. an
person o known immoralit z or any unmarried person under t e age o 16
ears unless such person is accompanied b a parent or guardian, nor an
unmarried person more than 16, and under the age o 18, years unless such
person is accompanied b a
parent or guardian or resents the written
consent o a parent or guardian to the officer in charge o such dance. and
every such written permit shall be retained by such o ficer.
0
(d) It shall be incumbent upon the person to whom such permit is issued to
have a peace officer, designated by the Director o Public Safety, resent at
every public dance. In all cases the fees and expenses of such peace officer
shall be aid in advance b the person to whom the permit has been issued.
either the City, nor its officers, agent or employees shall be liable or the
conduct of any designated peace officer who is not an employee of the City.
Subd. 11. Hours. Dances to be held on Saturday nights shall end promptly
at 12:00 p.m. No dance shall be held before 12:00 noon on any Sunday nor between
1:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon on any day.
Subd. 12. 6tate baw: Revocation. 4n all ether respeets the previeiens of
Minnesota Statutes; See4ens 624:49 to 694:54 apply to perrm4ts and eempHanee
w44h this sul3seetien 3s required Nem-eempl+anee w4th the statutery prev3siens e€
the previsiens of tH+rs seet+en is greends for reveeatien.
The Director of Public Safety may revoke or suspend the permit upon non-
compliance by the permittee of any of the provisions of this Subsection.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day
of , 19 .
Steven J. Quam, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas.P. Ferber, City Clerk
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 58
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Renewal of On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for
Kinhdo Restaurant, 6345 Penn Avenue.
Background:
The application for the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating
malt liquor license has been submitted by Kinhdo Restaurant. The
required license fee has been paid.
The public safety investigation has been conducted and revealed
the following:
- The applicant has submitted the required liquor liability
insurance coverage.
- The applicant has paid all general real estate, state
sales, and withholding taxes.
- Ms. Jennifer Bui continues to be the owner and manager.
Ms. Bui has no known criminal record.
- During the previous twelve months there were four public
safety contacts with Kinhdo Restaurant. This compares
with eight contacts for the previous year. Of the four
contacts none were of a criminal nature, one of the four
was a "bar type" incident, that was a detox commitment.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor
license for the Kinhdo Restaurant.
Basis For Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of
both the city code and state statute pertaining to
3.2 beer licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and
the investigation conducted by the Public Safety
Department, there appears to be no reason to deny the
renewal of the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the renewal.
If the license renewal is continued, the Council must
consider granting an extension of the applicant's license
to allow the applicant to continue to sell 3'.2 beer until
the matter can be concluded.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the
license. Any suspension or revocation must, according
?X/- X
to Minnesota State Statute 340A, be based upon a finding
that the licensee has failed to comply with an
applicable statute, rule or ordinance pertaining to
alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that
no revocation or suspension takes effect until the
licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing
under Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative
Procedure Act.
Public Safety has determined that the licensee has not committed
any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and therefore,
recommends the license not be revoked or suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The request for the renewal of this license has been placed on
Resp fully submitted,
Jame D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:bac
•
•
l? J
Public Safety Contacts 8 4
Of the 4 contacts in 1989, none were of a criminal nature.
is
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 59
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Renewal of On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for
Airport Bowl, 7711 14th Avenue.
Background:
The application for the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating
malt liquor license has been submitted by Airport Bowl. The
required license fee has been paid.
The public safety investigation has been conducted and revealed
the following:
- The applicant has submitted the required liquor liability
insurance coverage.
- The applicant has paid all general real estate, state
sales, and withholding taxes.
- Ms. Doris White continues to be the owner and manager of
the establishment. She has no known criminal record.
During the previous twelve months there were fourteen
public safety contacts with Airport Bowl. This compares
with eighteen contacts for the previous year. Of the
fourteen contacts, eight were of a criminal nature, one
was a "bar type" incident, that being an assault.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor
license for Airport Bowl.
Basis For Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of
both the city code and state statute pertaining to 3.2
beer licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and
the investigation conducted by the Public Safety
Department, there appears to be no reason to deny the
renewal of the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the renewal.
If the license hearing is continued, the Council must
consider granting an extension of the applicant's
license to allow the applicant to continue to sell
3.2 beer until the matter has been concluded.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the
license. Any suspension or revocation must, according to
Minnesota State Statute 340A, be based upon a finding
that the licensee has failed to comply with an
applicable statute, rule or ordinance pertaining to
alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee
has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under
Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure
Act.
Public Safety has determined the licensee has not committed any
violation relating to alcoholic beverages and recommends the
license not be revoked or suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The request for the renewal of this license has been placed on
the consent calendar for February 26, 1990.
Resp ct ly submitted,
James . Prosser
City M pager
JDP:bac
•
0
•
1989 Pt In TC• CAF Ty tbNTA(' C t o
AIRPORT RQWT. _ 7711 14TH A<1FN(tF
Public Safety Contacts 18 14
Of the 14 contacts in 1989, 8 were of a criminal nature. Those
eight consisted of 4 thefts, l malicious mischief, 1 vehicle
theft, l assault and l hit and run.
0
e
. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 60
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Renewal of On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for
Godfather's Pizza, 2 West 66th Street.
Background:
The application for the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating
malt liquor license has been submitted by Godfather's Pizza. The
required license fee has been paid.
The public safety investigation has been conducted and revealed
the following:
- The applicant has submitted the required liquor liability
insurance coverage.
- The applicant has paid all general real estate, state
sales, and withholding taxes.
- Mr. Michael Kling is the manager of the restaurant. Mr.
Kling has no known criminal record.
During the previous twelve months there were six public
safety contacts with Godfather's Pizza. This compares
with seven contacts for the previous year. Of the six
contacts four were of a criminal nature, one of the four
was a "bar type" incident, that being an assault.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor
license for Godfather's Pizza.
Basis For Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of
both the city code and state statute pertaining to 3.2
beer licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and
the investigation conducted by the Public Safety
Department, there appears to be no reason to deny the
renewal of the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the renewal hearing.
If the license renewal is continued, the Council must
consider granting an extension of the applicant's license
to allow the applicant to continue to sell 3.2 beer until
the matter is concluded.
. 2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the
license. Any suspension or revocation must,
;el ?/- e
according to Minnesota State Statute 340A, be based
upon a finding that the licensee has failed to
comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance
pertaining to alcoholic beverages. The Council
must also note that no revocation or suspension takes
effect until the licensee has been afforded an
opportunity for a hearing under Sections 14.57 to 14.70
of the Administrative Procedure Act.
The Public Safety Department has determined that the
licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic
beverages and therefore, recommends that the license not
be revoked or suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The request for the renewal of this license has been placed on
the consent calendar for February 26, 1990.
Respe lly submitted,
James Prosser
City Hager
0 JDP:bac
lJ
•
19$9 P[JS .Tr- RA FTV p TArTR F--
Public Safety Contacts 7 6
Of the 6 contacts in 1989, four were of a criminal nature. Those
four consisted of 1 assault, 1 vandalism, 1 malicious mischief
and 1 bike theft.
0
0
Z7,
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 61
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Renewal of On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for
Lariat Lanes, 6320 Penn Avenue.
Background:
The application for the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating
malt liquor license has been submitted by Lariat Lanes. The
required license fee has been paid.
The public safety investigation has been conducted and revealed
the following:
- The applicant has submitted the required liquor liability
insurance coverage.
- The applicant has paid all general real estate taxes.
The applicant has not paid the sales and withholding
taxes due to the State of Minnesota in the amount of
$1,038.69. The applicant was notified by the Department
of Revenue on January 30, 1990 by letter of the need to
make payment and is aware that failure to pay those
taxes due may result in the license not being renewed
in the City of Richfield.
- Mr. John Powers Jr. is the manager of the restaurant. Mr.
John Powers Sr. is the owner. Neither has a'known
criminal record.
- During the previous twelve months there were fifteen
public safety contacts with Lariat Lanes. This compares
with nine contacts for the previous year. Of the fifteen
contacts six were of a criminal nature, two of the six
were "bar type" incidents, one assault, one drunkeness.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor
license for Lariat Lanes provided that payment of all Minnesota
state sales and withholding taxes in arrears is made by February
26, 1990.
Basis For Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of
both the city code and state statute pertaining to 3.2
beer licensing with the exception of payment of state
sales and withholding taxes.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and
;e/z/ ? .
the investigation conducted by the Public Safety
Department, there appears to be no reason to deny the
renewal of the license requested providing state sales
and withholding taxes are paid.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the renewal
hearing. If the license renewal is continued, the
Council must consider granting an extension of the
applicant's license to allow the applicant to continue
to sell 3.2 beer until the matter is concluded.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the
license. Any suspension or revocation must, according
to Minnesota State Statute 340A, be based upon a
finding that the licensee has failed to comply with
an applicable statute, rule or ordinance pertaining
to alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note
that no revocation or suspension takes effect until
the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a
hearing under Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the
Administrative Procedure Act.
Public Safety has determined that the licensee has not committed
any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and recommends the
license not be revoked or suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The request for the renewal of this license has been placed on
the consent calendar for February 26, 1990.
Resp ct ly submitted,
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:bac
r1
L
0
•
Public Safety Contacts 9
Of the 15 contacts in 1989, six were
six consisted of 3 thefts, 1 assault,
in the parking lot and 1 runaway.
15
of a criminal nature. Those
1 juvenile alcohol problem
40
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 62
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Renewal of On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for
Sandy's Tavern, 6612 Penn Avenue.
Background:
The application for the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating
malt liquor license has been submitted by Sandyw's Tavern. The
required license fee has been paid.
The public safety investigation has been conducted and revealed
the following:
- The applicant has submitted the required liquor liability
insurance coverage.
- The applicant has paid all general real estate, state
sales, and withholding taxes.
- Ms. Debra Erickson is the manager of the tavern. Mr.
Jeffrey Erickson is the applicant. Neither has a known
criminal record.
During the previous twelve months there were four public
safety contacts with Sandy's Tavern. This compares
with four contacts for the previous year. Of the four
contacts two were of a criminal nature, two of the four
were "bar type" incidents, one domestic, one assault.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the renewal of the on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor
license for Sandy's Tavern.
Basis For Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of
both the city code and state statute pertaining to 3.2
beer licensing.
2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and
the investigation conducted by the Public Safety
Department, there appears to be no reason to deny the
renewal of the license requested.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide to continue the renewal.
If the license hearing is continued, the Council must
consider granting an extension of the applicant's
license to allow the applicant to continue to sell 3.2
beer until the matter can be concluded.
2. The Council could decide to suspend or revoke the
license. Any suspension or revocation must, according to
Minnesota State Statute 340A, be based upon a finding
that the licensee has failed to comply with an
applicable statute, rule or ordinance pertaining to
alcoholic beverages. The Council must also note that no
/i/_ _
revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee
has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under
Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure
Act.
Public Safety has determined that the licensee has not committed
any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and recommends the
license not be revoked or suspended.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The request for the renewal of this license has been placed on
the consent calendar for February 26, 1990.
Respec y submitted,
James Prosser
City M alter
JDP:bac
r?
0
•
Public Safety Contacts
4
4
Of the 4 contacts in 1989, two were of a criminal nature. Those
two consisted of 1 vehicle theft and 1 assault.
•
11
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 63
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Payment to the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
Administrator in excess of $5,000.
Background:
The City purchases general liability insurance from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust with GAB Business Services as
Administrator. The City's insurance policy has a $50,000
deductible for liability claims. In 1986, the City significantly
reduced its premium by having a large deductible. The premium
savings and additional monies have been used to create a Self-
Insurance Fund to cover payments made which are under the
deductible as claims arise.
On August 4, 1987, a youth was allegedly injured while playing on
the waterslide at Fairwood Park. A lawsuit against the City was
subsequently commenced by the child's parents claiming the City
was negligent.
A compromise settlement was agreed to by the claimants and the
City's insurance administrator through the League of MN Cities
Insurance Trust. The settlement includes a lump sum payment of
$2,500. In addition, attorney fees totaled $2,900.43. Since the
settlement and legal costs fall within our deductible limit, the
City is directly responsible for the payment.
• Recommended Motion:
Approve the payment to GAB Business Services in the amount of
$5,400.43.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The City's insurance policy provides that the insurance
carrier shall, at its discretion, investigate, settle, or
defend any claims or suit against the City. The insurance
carrier and its attorneys have settled this claim.
2. Funding is provided for defense or payment of claims
costing less than the $50,000 deductible.
Alternative Recommendation:
None.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is on the February 26, 1990 regular City Council
meeting consent calendar. Payment should be made to reimburse
the insurance administrator as quickly as possible.
ly submitted,
Prosser
JDP:ff
0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 64
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Purchase in excess of $5,000 for Madison Park and Jefferson Park
playfeature additions.
Background:
The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that
when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or
construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase
shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration.
In 1988, the City began a four year phased acquisition of
improved playfeatures at Madison and Jefferson Parks. This
purchase marks phase three. Each park has had installed a series
of decks for accessing various components of the playfeature, a
tire swing, straight slide, fire pole, and ladder. Phase three
will include a Track Ride with two decks, an E1 Slide, and a
safety wall. The supplier for this equipment for the first two
phases has been Earl F. Anderson & Associates, Inc., representing
Landscape Structures. To insure compatibility, the same company
will be supplying phase three.
Recommended Motion:
-Approve the purchase of the playfeature components from Earl F.
Anderson & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $5,000.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Earl F. Anderson & Associates, Inc. has provided the
previous two phases.
2. Using the same manufacturer insures compatibility.
3. Landscape-Structures has a national reputation for safety
and quality.
4. There is $5,000 for purchase of this equipment in the 1990
park maintenance budget.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Council could decide not to expand the playfeatures at
Madison Park or Jefferson Park.
2. Council could expand only one of the parks this year.
3. Council could request that staff research other
manufacturers; however, compatibility would be nonexistent.
E
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for the February 26, 1990 regular City
Council meeting. Staff is asking for approval at this time so
the equipment can be ordered and installed this spring.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame Prosser
City M nager
JDP/GLB
•
40
7e7l/
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No.-57
Agenda February 26, 1990
Issue Statement:
Acknowledging Engineering Excellence Award for Veterans Memorial
Park of Richfield.
Background:
The Consulting Engineers Council of Minnesota, now in its 40th
year, is an association dedicated to the advancement of
consulting engineering and the maintenance of highest ethical and
technical standards in engineering. Veterans Memorial Park of
Richfield, specifically the pathways and amphitheater, was
entered into competition for the 23rd annual Engineering
Excellence Awards. On February 2, 1990, Veterans Memorial Park
of Richfield was named an Honor Award Winner in the competition.
Geotechnical Engineering Corporation, the geotechnical
consultant, coordinated the competition entry. The City of
Richfield is the project owner. Orr, Schelen, Mayeron &
Associates, Inc. served as the civil engineering consultant.
Gair & Associates served as planning consultant while Martin &
Pitz Associates served as design consultant. Dr. Tuncer Edil
also served as a geotechnical consultant.
The project was described as follows:
Pathways and an amphitheater were constructed in
the wetlands at Veterans Memorial Park of Richfield.
The park offers recreational, athletic and cultural
experiences in a wetland setting for urbanites.
Geotechnical Engineering Corporation demonstrated
the feasibility of supporting the structures on existing
material as opposed to utilizing more costly conventional
excavate/refill techniques by:
1) Constructing the amphitheater embankment
in stages to consolidate and increase the
strength of swamp deposits.
2) Strengthening the amphitheater embankment
with geotextiles.
3) Using wood chips as a lightweight pathway
embankment material.
This project represents advances in state-of-
practice for design construction of ecologically
compatible structures in wetlands. By not using
excavate/refill operations, disturbance of the wetland
ecosystem was minimized.
Recommended Motion:
Accept the Engineering Excellence Honor Award plaque for Veterans
Memorial Park of Richfield on behalf of the City of Richfield and
extend appreciation to the consultants who worked on the project.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The Veterans Memorial Park of Richfield project has been
named an Engineering Excellence Honor Award winner.
#/-
2. Several consultants were involved in the improvements used to
expand the use of the Veterans Memorial Park of Richfield
wetlands in an ecologically compatible, financially
reasonable and technologically innovative manner.
Alternative Recommendation:
Do not accept the award.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for the February 26 City Council meeting.
Representatives of the various consulting firms have been invited
to attend this meeting.
Respectf ly submitted,
James Prosser
City Manager
JDP/sdr
C7
0