Loading...
06-11-90 agenda~i CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 138 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement• Presentation of~Certificates of Appreciation to the 1990 Miss Richfield Candidates. Backaround• Each year,•a young lady is selected as Miss Richfield during the Fourth of July activities. This year there are twelve candidates. Recommended Motion: Present each candidate with a Certificate of Appreciation. Basis for Recommendation: 1. This has been a long-standing tradition. 2. The candidates will be present to receive these certificates. Alternative Recommendation: 1. None Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been placed on the Presentation Section of the June 11 agenda, and certificates have been prepared. Resp lly submitted, James Prosser City nager JDP:e~a ~- i-~ 1990 RICHFIELD QUEEN CANDIDATES LYNETTE BLEVINS Lynette graduated from Richfield High School in 1988. She is currently attending Rennsselaer Poly Technical Institute studying communications and architecture.. Her parents are Richard and Vonnie Blevins. Lynette is sponsored by the Optimist Club. FRANCINE EID Francine is a 1990 graduate of Richfield High School. Her plans are to attend Brown Institute to pursue a career in advertisement. Her parents are Barry and Ann Eid. Francine is sponsored bg the Rotary Club. CAROL GRONNER Carol is a 19$8 graduate of Richfield High School-and is currently attending Augsburg College. She is pursuing a career in communications. Her mother is Marilyn Gronner. Carol is sponsored by Fred Babcock VFW Post 5555. GAIL HOPPE Gail is a 1990 graduate of Richfield High School. She plans to attend Normandale College in the fall and then go on to UMD to study secondary English. Her parents are John and Mary Hoppe. Gail is sponsored by Solmark Temporary. KELLY KISPERT Kelly is a 1990 graduate of Richfield High School planning to attend Gustavus Adolphus College. Her plans are to pursue a career in elementary education. Her parents are Brian and Jan Kispert. Kelly is sponsored by Richfield Plumbing. ~i-~ KATHY LINDSTROM Kathy is a 1987 graduate of Richfield High School and is now attending the University of Minnesota. She hopes to pursue her career in community corrections. Her parents are Jerry and Marcy Lindstrom. Kathy is sponsored by Richfield Bank and Trust. JILL MCKUSICK Jill graduated from Richfield High School in 1990 and will. attend Augsburg College in the fall. She is pursuing a career in the field of science. Her parents are Bruce and Joanne McKusick. Jill is sponsored by the Hub Merchants. HEATHER MEIERS Heather graduated from Richfield High School in 1988 and is currently attending Normandale Community College. Her plans are to pursue veterinary medicine at St. Catherines College. Her parents are Robert and Carol Meiers. Heather is sponsored by McDonalds. RHONDA PAQUETTE Rhonda is 18 years old and a 1989 graduate of Richfield High School currently attending Normandale College. Her plans are to attend Mankato State and study business administration. Her parents are Sid and Donna Zochert. Rhonda is sponsored by the American Legion. GINA RAE SENSKE Gina graduated from Richfield High School in 1988 and is currently attending the University of Minnesota. She is studying theatre arts and production. Her parents are Myrle and Marlowe Senske. Gina is sponsored by Spirit Unlimited. ~- i ~ CHERYL STROTHER Cheryl is a 1988 graduate of Richfield High School and a 1989 graduate of the Medical Institute of Minnesota. She is pursuing her career as a medical assistant. Her mother is Marilyn Strother. Cheryl is sponsored by Market Plaza. CATHY SULLA Cathy is 18 years old and a 1990 graduate of Richfield High School. She plans to attend St. Cloud State in the fall to study business. Her mother is Mary Sulla. Cathy is sponsored by Hampton Inn. ~- i -~- 1989 RICHFIELD ROYALTY ELISA HOLTON, QUEEN ' Elisa is a 1987 graduate of Richfield High School. She is currently a junior at Augsburg College majoring in elementary education. She is captain of the danceline at Augsburg. Her mother is Susan Holton. CHRISTINE HENDRICKSON, PRINCESS Christine is a 1989 graduate of Richfield High School. She is a freshman at UMD majoring in elementary education and on the school's tennis team. Her parents are Larry and Jane Henrickson. CINDY ZUBICK, PRINCESS Cindy is a 1988 graduate of Richfield High School and will be continuing her education at Normandale College. She is a licensed cosmotologist. Her parents are Gayle and Marc Ede. GINA FORNICOIA, MISS CONGENIALITY Gina is a 1987 graduate of Richfield High School. She. is currently a junior at Bethel College majoring in social work. She is doing her internship at Minneapolis Crisis Nursery. Her parents are Mike and Judy Fornicoia. i~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 139 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement• Presentation of.Certificate of Recognition from Senior Community Services Background• The Senior•Outreach Program and the H.O.M.E. Program, both operate out of the South Hennepin Human Services Council facility, and both are supported by the Richfield City Council. They are desirous of expressing their appreciation for the support of the Council by presenting the City Council with a Certificate of Recognition. Recommendation• Accept the certificate from members of the Senior Outreach Program. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The certificate has been prepared for presentation on June 11. Alternative Recommendation: 1. None Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is scheduled under the Presentation Section of the June 11, 1990 city council agenda. Respectfully submitted, Jame D Prosser City nager JDP/e j a ~~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 140 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement• City Council .designation of maximum dependent health insurance contribution for General Services and Management employee groups. Background: In November, 1989, the City Council adopted a resolution implementing the staff recommendation of a maximum dependent health insurance contribution for General Services and Management employees. The amount authorized in that resolution was $200.00 per month. However, since that resolution was passed, a number of issues have developed which merit further review. The City's primary consideration, with respect to its insurance contributions for health, dental and life insurance benefits, is the internal equity among the City's employee groups. Recent negotiations with the City's bargaining unit groups, as well as the settlement for 1990 for Police Officers and Police Supervisors, provide for an average 1990 City monthly maximum health insurance contribution of $210.00. A secondary consideration is the City's position with .respect to other municipalities in terms of monthly maximum health insurance contributions. In that regard, Richfield appears to be below the average, even with a $210.00 monthly contribution rate. One problem faced by Richfield, as well is the skyrocketing .cost of insurance. Richfield has fallen considerably short increases in monthly health insurance c~ increases to employees. In some cases, salary increase did not offset the cost insurance premium. as other municipalities, For the past three years, of being able to provide ~ntributions to offset an employee's annual of the increased The City's goal has consistently been to keep City employee groups comparable with respect to insurance contributions. The challenge for the City for the next several years will be to keep the groups of employees comparable while striving to prevent those employees from bearing the entirety of significant annual premium increases. For the current year, in order to keep the City's non-unionized employees comparable with Union employees, an adjustment of $10.00 per month per employee is necessary. It is suggested that such adjustment would be implemented for premium due for July 1, 1990. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution implementing an increase in monthly maximum health insurance contributions of $10.00 per month to $210.00 for General Services and Management employees. ~~ J' Basis of Recommendation: 1. The City has offered and settled bargaining unit employees at $210.00 per month maximum contribution. 2. Several. comparable communities have increased maximum dependent contribution to levels in the $225.00-$250.00 range for 1990. 3. Insurance premium costs for employees have risen dramatically in the past few years. City contributions have not kept up with those increases during those years. 4. The City has had a long standing strategy of keeping employee groups relatively equal for health insurance contributions. This is especially critical for the City's female dominated General Services pay plan. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The City Council could deny the increase to the City's General Services and Management employees. 2. The .City Council could make the effective date January 1, 1990 or some other date instead of July 1, 1990. Discussion/Decision Mode: In order to process the adjustment for-the July premium, action is necessary on June 11, 1990. ly submitted, James D Prosser City anager JDP:ff X ~" `~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARD HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR GENERAL SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES WHEREAS,. the hospital-medical/surgical group health insurance plan is available from the LOGIS Health Insurance Program for City employees and their families; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to determine by resolution the City's contribution toward the premium for employee group insurance coverages; and WHEREAS, Resolution Number 7564, adopted November 13, 1989, designated a maximum health insurance contribution of $200.00 per month toward employee health insurance; and WHEREAS, subsequent labor agreements for organized employee groups in the City of Richfield have been settled at a maximum of $210.00 per month per employee; and WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to keep Union and non-union employee groups comparable in terms of City insurance contributions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that commencing July 1, 1990, the City shall contribute a maximum of $210.00 per month toward an employee health insurance premium for all eligible non- unionized employees; in any event, said contribution shall not exceed the cost of single coverage for employees selecting that option. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City contribution rate set for dental, long term disability, and life insurance rates in Resolution Number 7564, adopted November 13, 1989, shall remain effective until modified by subsequent resolution. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk W ~~ J RESOLUTION N0. 7564 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY'S. CONTRIBUTION TOWARD HEALTH, TERM LIFE AND DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR GENERAL SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the hospital-medical/surgical group health insurance plan is available from the LOGIS Health Insurance Program for City employees and their familiest and WHEREAS, a term life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plan is available from the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Organization for City employees; and WHEREAS, a self-funded group dental insurance plan is available to City employees and their families; and WHEREAS, a group short-term and long-term disability program is available to City Management and General Services employees; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to determine by resolution the City's contribution toward the premium for employee group insurance coverages. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that commencing January 1, 1990, the City shall contribute a maximum of $200.00 per month toward an employee health insurance premium for all eligible non- unionized employees; in any event said contribution shall not exceed the cost of single coverage for employees selecting that option. The City shall also pay the 516.00 monthly premium for the employee dental insurance plan and a $2.55 monthly premium for the term life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plan for City employees for a total possible maximum insurance premium contribution of 5218.55 per month. Such contributions shall be for coverage effective January 1, 1990. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall contribute the full cost of long-term disability insurance for the General Services and Management employees' coverage. Such contribution shall be based upon a premium rate of $.55 per 5100 of monthly coverage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council shall determine the City's contribution toward insurance premiums for all organized employee groups by the adoption of the appropriate resolutions concerning labor contracts with the respective organized employee groups. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 13th day of November, 1989. ATTEST: Steven J. Quam Mayor Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk Y'" _) (J CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 141 Agenda June il, 1990 Issue Statement• Installation of•fire sprinklers at City Hall: Background: The adopted 1990 Capital Budget includes $15,000 to extend the fire sprinkler system in City Hall. Areas to be sprinkled include portions of the Administrative Services Department and Executive office areas, conference rooms, the main lobby and the Council Chambers. Two written quotations were submitted: Vendor Quotation Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. $11,810 Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company $13,750 Recommended Motion: Authorize extension of existing fire sprinklers to needed areas in City Hall in the amount of $11,810 with the work to be performed by Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. Basis of Recommendation:. 1. Portions of City Hall are not fire sprinklered. 2. The Fire Division has determined these portions of City Hall .should be fire sprinklered. 3. Midwest Fire Protection, Inc. submitted the lowest quotation. 4. There is sufficient funding available for this work. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Increase or decrease the areas to be sprinklered thereby adjusting the authorized cost accordingly. 2. Do not fire sprinkler any more of City Hall. 3. Authorize the work to be done by another vendor. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is on the June 11 consent calendar of the City Council. Respe fully submitted, Jam Prosser City ager JDP/sdr CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 142 Agenda June 14, 1990 Issue Statement: Purchase in excess of 55,000 for relining the sanitary sewer line at 71st Street and Oliver Avenue South. Background: The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration. After televising the sanitary sewer lines in the area of 71st Street. and Oliver Avenue, staff found 328 feet of defective sewer lines in need of replacing or relining. Both alternatives were considered and staff believes that relining, using 9 inch polyethelene pipe, would be most cost efficient and also would eliminate excavation and service interruption to residents. Two vendors were contacted and proposals were received from two manufacturers for the repair of the sewer line: Insituform Central Inc. $24,800 Visu-Sewer Inc. $14,892 Recommended Motion: Approve a 1990 Purchase Order to Visu-Sewer for relining the sanitary sewer line at 71st and Oliver for an estimated purchase price of $14,892. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The relining of 328. feet of sanitary sewer lines would allow far the repair of the line and eliminate the need fo.r excavation and service interruption to residents. Relining would be more cost efficient than replacement. 2. Visu-Sewer submitted the lowest quotation. 3. There is $15,000 in the 1990 revised budget for the purchase. Alternative Recommendation: Council may choose not to accept any of the quotations and instruct staff to obtain new quotes. However, staff does not believe better prices can be obtained at this time. ~, - ~ Discussion/Decision"Mode: Staff requests approval at the June 14, 1990 Council meeting. Respectf y submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP/cpk ~`' fJ" D CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 143 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Purchase in excess of $5,000 for Personnel. Decisions, Inc. (PDI) for Fire Chief recruitment and selection process. Backcrround In December, 1989, The City of Richfield Police and Fire Civil Service Commission approved a process for recruiting and selecting a Fire Chief in the Public Safety Department as a result of Pat Coughlin's resignation. The selection process approved by the Civil Service Commission included use of PDI to assist in the selection process. PDI performed similar work for the City and is recognized nationally for their expertise in police and fire selection, recruiting, testing, personnel issues and promotions. The process used included: -- Position Profile, -- Recruitment, -- Design and training of an oral interview, -- Assessment of candidates and applications (simulation exercise, in-basket, group discussion exercise, candidate profile,. et al). In March, 1990, the process was completed and on April 12, 1990, the Civil Service Commission approved and certified the eligibility list. While no one has been selected at this writing, the position was offered to one person who has declined for a number of reasons. A second candidate has withdrawn from consideration. Recommended Motion: Approve the bill for PDI in the amount of $6,548.49 for their services in the recruitment and selection process for the Fire Chief position. Basis for Recommendation: 1. PDI was selected because of their knowledge and skills and their national reputation in processes such as this. 2. It was important to the City to have a firm such as PDI provide this service to ensure a thorough search and selection be made. 3. There is sufficient funds available for this contract. Alternative Recommendation: None ~~ ~ Discussion/Decision Mode: This item appears on the June requests the Council approve Personnel Decisions, Inc., in 11, 1990, Council agenda. Staff the purchase in excess of $5,000 to the amount of $6,548.49. . Respec ly submitted, Jame Prosser City nager JDP:cak Richfield, MN Attn: M.r Jack Erskine Director of Public Safety 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 Richfield Fire Chief Selection I Generation of Position Profile Recruitment ~ Design ~ Training of Oral Interview Interview Training ~ Administrative Support I Assessment of 4 Candidates @ $500/each Sub-Total i Less amount previously billed & paid Total Due - Labor { Expenses Courier Service Ground Transportation Telephone Total Due - Expenses $ 36.35 $ 3.57 $ 8.57 $6,500.00 $ 48.49 $6,548,49 Total Due PERSONNEL DECISIONS, II~'C. BUILDING SUCCESSFUL ORGANIZATIONS (6L) 339-~q,,^ Date: 8 May 1990 Invoice No: 5402 A Project No: 922200 - 5402 Project Mgr: 137 $1500.00 $2000.00 $1250.00 $ 750.00 $1000.00 .$2000.00 $8500.00 ($2000.00) TERMS: NET 30 DAYS REMIT TO: PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC. 15~ MONTHLY CHARGE 45 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET # 2000 ANNUAL RATE OF L'~7a MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1608 FEDERAL ID #41-0858903 ~ ~L CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 144 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Resolution relating to 1991 maintenance assessments, Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (L/H/N) Redevelopment Area, City Project No. 862. Background• On January•26, 1989, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6372, which established a service in the L/H/N area (approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue) which would be specially assessed. The special assessment to commercial property would be made on the basis of area, with each square foot of assessable commercial property within the district being assessed an equal amount. All single family, two family and multiple family residential property within this area were eliminated from the special assessment levy. In 1982, agreements were reached with owners in the L/H/N area related to maintenance of property. For the most part, each owner was to be responsible for property to .the curb while the City is responsible for common areas such as street islands. Although the City does do some maintenance work for individual property owners, these costs are directly assessed to the appropriate owner and maintenance of common areas continues to be assessed to the entire district. Current maintenance services for the district would include, but not necessarily be limited to, one or more of the following: 1. Landscaping, including tree trimming; 2. Sidewalk sweeping in the summer; 3. Snow removal in the winter; 4. Sidewalk deicing; 5. Painting and repair of wood furniture; 6. Trash removal; 7. General maintenance, including repairs and replacement; 8. Irrigation maintenance. These items are extra services provided directly to the L/H/N Redevelopment Area and do not include services provided to the entire City. For example, alI City streets are swept twice a year, and for this service there would be no charge to the L/H/N maintenance assessment. However, any additional street sweeping in the L/H/N area would be an assessable item. 1989 actual costs for these services were $43,151.19. Estimated 1990 costs are $44,560 and estimated 1991 costs are 545,374. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution proposing to specially assess for the costs of current services provided within the L/H/N project # 5G - I area for the period of January 1,.1991 through December 31, 1991, and to set the public hearing date for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Resolution No. 6372, adopted in 1981, established a policy for assessing the costs. 2. This policy allows staff to continue to provide excellent service to the L/H/N Redevelopment Area. Alternative Recommendation: Council may choose to establish a set rate and limit the maintenance performed to that dollar amount; however, staff believes the redevelopment area would suffer if limited maintenance was performed. Discussion/Decision Mode: Continued maintenance service for this commercial area is recommended by staff in order to sustain the current standards for landscaping and maintenance which have been successful over the past years. Respec ly submitted, James Prosser City Manager JDP/reb Attachment ~~-a RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COSTS OF CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET PROJECT AREA FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1991 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991 CITY PROJECT NO. 862 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota. as follows: 1. There is hereby established a special assessment district, the boundaries of which are conterminous with the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area, for the purposes of assessing for current services provided by the city.. 2. The following current services of the city are hereby proposed to be undertaken by the city in the district, with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against benefited property within the district: Snow, ice or rubbish removal; Weed elimination; Elimination or removal of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding and structure included under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 463.15 to 463.26; Installation or repair of water service lines; Street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets; Trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees; Repair of sidewalks, crosswalks, and other pedestrian walkways; Operation of the street lighting system; Maintenance of landscaped areas and other public amenities on or adjacent to street right-of-way; Maintenance of Civic Plaza; Snow removal and other maintenance of streets; Painting and repair of wood furniture; General maintenance, including repairs and replacement. 3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such current services consists of every assessable lot and parcel of land within the district. It is proposed that special assessments on commercial property be made on the basis of the area with .each square foot of assessable commercial property within the district being assessed an equal amount for maintenance of common area. Exempt from the special assessment levy shall be all single family, two-family, multiple family residential property within the L/H/N redevelopment district. Special maintenance of individual commercial properties shall be assessed directly for costs incurred in performing said maintenance to said property. ~ 5~ -3 4. The city clerk is authorized and directed to give public notice of a hearing by this council at which the council will consider the undertaking of such current services and the levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing 'as required by law. Such hearing shall be held on Monday, July 23, 1990, commencing at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda. 5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the costs of the aforementioned services for the period of January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. The estimated cost of providing all of the aforementioned current services during that period is $45,374. Passed by the .City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ^~ ~ r CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Zetter No. 145 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Resolution relating to 1991 Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet Redevelopment Area (ILN) maintenance assessments, City Project No. 863. Background: On March 14, 1988, the Council adopted Resolution No. 7405 establishing a policy that the actual cost of performing current maintenance services in the ILN Project Area, (area approximately bounded by Lyndale on the east and 77th Street on the south) would be assessed. The special assessment to multi-residential and commercial property-would be made on the basis of area, with each square foot of assessable property within the district being assessed an equal amount. Current maintenance services for the district would include, but not necessarily be limited to the following: 1. Landscape maintenance of common properties including, among other things, tree trimming, mowing, fertilizing and edging. 2. Irrigation maintenance. 3. Painting and repair of wood furniture. 4. Trash removal and general maintenance including repair and replacement of lights, sidewalks, curbs, furniture and plantings. These items are extra services provided directly to the ILN Project Area and do not include services provided to the entire City. 1988 actual costs for these services were $7001.47. Estimated 1989 costs were $7254; actual costs were $6135.54. Estimated 1990 costs are $7514, and estimated 1991 costs are $7475. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached Resolution proposing to specially assess the ILN Project Area for the period of January 1 through December 31, 1991, and to set the public hearing date for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Resolution No. 7405, adopted in 1988, established a policy for assessing the costs. 2. This policy will allow staff to continue to provide excellent service to the ILN Project Area. Alternative Recommendation: Council may choose to establish a set rate and limit the maintenance performed to that dollar amount; however, staff believes the redevelopment area would suffer if limited maintenance was performed. J~ ~ ' Discussion/Decision Mode: Continued maintenance service for this area staff in order to sustain current standards maintenance. Action on this item should be meet the requirements for the public hearing Respec u y is recommended by for landscaping and taken at this time to date. submitted, James Prosser City ager JDP/reb Attachment /~ - ~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COSTS OF CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE INTERSTATE/LYNDALE/NICOLLET PROJECT AREA FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1991 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991. CITY PROJECT NO. 863 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. There is hereby established a special assessment district, the boundaries of which are Lyndale Avenue, 78th Street, the railroad tracks and 77th Street including that property known as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-24-33-0073, for the purposes of assessing for current services provided by the city. 2. The following current services of the city are hereby proposed to be undertaken by the city in the district, with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against benefited commercial and multiple family residential property within the district include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Landscape maintenance of common properties; including tree trimming, mowing, fertilizing, edging; Irrigation. maintenance; Painting and repair of wood furniture; Trash removal and general maintenance including repairs and replacement of lights, sidewalks, curbs, furniture, plantings. 3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such current services consists of every assessable lot and parcel of land within the district. It is proposed that special assessments on commercial and multi-family residential property be made on the basis of the area with each square foot of assessable property within the district being assessed an equal amount for maintenance of common area. 4. The city clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of a hearing by this council at which time the council will consider the undertaking of such current services and the levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing as required by law. Such hearing shall be held on Monday, July 23, 1990, commencing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda. 5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the costs of the aforementioned services for the period of January 1,1991 through December 31, 1991. The estimated cost of providing all ~5~'3 of the aforementioned current services during that period is $7475. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield., Minnesota this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~SC~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 146 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Proposed 1991 alley maintenance special assessment project - City Project No. 864. Background: The alley policy adopted by the City Council in 1980 provides that."all costs involved in maintaining an alley will be assessed against the property abutting the alley." In 1981, the maintenance functions to unpaved alleys covered sweeping, cleaning of potholes and cold patching. In 1982 and years since, the maintenance functions covered by this assessment included not only repair work to unpaved alleys, but also an assessment to all alleys, paved or unpaved, for snowplowing services. The actual 1989 maintenance costs for all alleys totalled $17,725.98, or approximately $9.60/per fifty-foot lot. These charges were primarily for sweeping, snowplowing and joint repair on paved alleys. The 1990 estimates for alley maintenance are $20,000, or approximately $10.75/per fifty-foot lot on a paved alley. This estimate is anticipating a normal winter of snowplowing and sweeping; plus the concrete joint sealing maintenance program initiated in the 1989 alley maintenance program. As for 1991, the estimates are $21,000 for approximately $11.00 for a fifty-foot lot. estimate for sweeping and a normal winter additional $3.30/per lot is an estimate of concrete joint sealing maintenance program part of routine maintenance. alley maintenance or $7.70/per lot is the ~f snowplowing. The costs to continue a on paved alleys as a Estimates of additional costs on unpaved alleys each year have been about $23.00/per lot. Costs have varied depending on the amount of patching required. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution which proposes to specially assess the costs of 1991 services for alley maintenance and sets the public hearing on this special assessment project for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Previously adopted policy mandates the assessments. 2. The project is feasible. Alternative Recommendation: Council may choose to establish a set rate for snowplowing; however, the remaining unpaved alleys in the city will still ~~- i require yearly maintenance; as well as the older alleys which now require cracksealing. Discussion/Decision Mode: Council may choose to delay adoption of this Resolution until the next meeting; however, any further delay would cause scheduling problems with legal notices required by Minnesota State Statute. Respectfu submitted, James Prosser City M ger JDP/reb Attachment ~~~~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COSTS OF CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED FOR ALLEY MAINTENANCE IN THE CITY OF'RICHFIELD JANUARY 1,1991 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991 CITY PROJECT NO. 864 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:. 1. That area which includes the property which abuts improved alleys in Richfield (the "District") is hereby established as a special assessment district for the purpose of assessing for current services provided by the City; 2. That the following current services of the City are hereby proposed to be undertaken by the City in the District with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against the benefited property within the District: the. maintenance and snowplowing of alleys; 3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such current services consists of every assessable lot and parcel of land within the District. It is proposed that special assessments on property be made on the basis of prorated share of assessable abutting footage as defined in the alley improvement policy, Resolution No. 6345; 4. The city clerk is authorized and directed to publish notice of a public hearing by this Council at which time the Council will consider the undertaking of such current services and the levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. Such notice shall be published in the official newspaper at least once and at least two weeks prior to the date of hearing. Such hearing shall be held on Monday, July 23, 1990, commencing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda. 5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the costs of the aforementioned services for the period from January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. The estimated cost of providing all of the aforementioned current services during that period, using day labor, is $21,000. 6. The project is feasible. ~5~- ~ Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 147 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Preparation of assessment rolls and setting hearing date for City Project 844, 1989 Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area Maintenance. Backaround• City staff•has determined costs to be assessed. for the maintenance of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area, City Project 844, the 1989 LHN Maintenance Project. Attached are resolutions declaring the costs to be assessed and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment rolls, and setting the hearing date for the proposed assessment. 1989 actual costs for these services were $43,151.19. Estimated 1990 costs are $44,560 and estimated 1991 costs are $45,374. Recommended Motion: Approve the resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of the proposed assessment roll for LHN maintenance, and the resolution setting the date of hearing on the proposed assessment for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: Council ordered the work, and the work is done. Alternative Recommendation: Council may make any changes to the assessment roll as deemed necessary after the public hearing. Discussion/Decision Mode: In order to meet certification approval at this time. deadlines, staff is requesting Jame Prosser City anager Respe fully submitted, JDP/reb Attachments ~ ~~- ~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR LHN MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1989 CITY PROJECT N0. 8.44 WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the maintenance of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area which is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for such maintenance amount to $43,151.19 for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $44,405.24. 2. The city clerk, with the assistance of the city engineer and the operations coordinator, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such maintenance against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. .The city clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~~'~ RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED. ASSESSMENT FOR LHN MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1989 CITY PROJECT NO. 844 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield on June 11, 1990, the city clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of maintaining the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area which is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield, Minnesota for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989. WHEREAS, the city clerk has notified the City Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of July, 1990, in the council chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said maintenance assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the maintenance. The city clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~ ~l CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 148 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Preparation of assessment rolls and setting hearing .date for City Project No. 846, 1989 Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet Redevelopment Area (ILN) Maintenance. Background City staff•has determined costs to be assessed for the maintenance of the InterstatejLyndalejNicollet Redevelopment Area, City Project No. 846, the 1989 ILN Maintenance Project. Attached are resolutions declaring the costs to be assessed and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment rolls, and setting the hearing date for the proposed assessment. Actual cost for the maintenance services in-1988 was $7001.47. Estimated 1989 costs were $7254; actual costs were $6135.54. Estimated 1990 costs are $7514, and estimated 1991 costs are $7475. Recommended Motion: Approve the resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of the proposed assessment roll for ILN maintenance, and approve the resolution setting the date of hearing on the proposed assessment for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: Council ordered the work, and the work is done. Alternative Recommendation: Council may make any changes to the assessment roll as deemed necessary after the public hearing. Discussion/Decision Mode: In order to meet certain legal requirements for publishing legal notices and notifying affected property owners, staff is requesting approval at this time. lly submitted, Jame Prosser City nager JDP/reb Attachments ~~~~ l RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR ILN MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1989 CITY PROJECT NO. 846 WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the maintenance of the Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment Area which is approximately bounded by Lyndale Avenue, 78th Street, the railroad tracks and 77th Street including that property known as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-24-33-0073, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for such maintenance amount to $6,135.54 for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $6,135.54. 2. The city clerk, with assistance of the city engineer and the facilities/project coordinator, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such maintenance against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The city clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~5y-a RESOLUTION N0. RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR ILN MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1, 1989 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1989 CITY PROJECT NO. 846 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield on June 11, 1990, the city clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of maintaining the interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment Area which is approximately bounded by Lyndale Avenue, 78th Street, the railroad tracks and 77th Street including that property known as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-24-33-0073, in the City of Richfield, Minnesota for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989. WHEREAS, the city clerk has notified the City Council that such proposed. assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of July, 1990, in the council chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass .upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said maintenance assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the maintenance. The city clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of-June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ~~ ~ ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~~i CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 149 Agenda June ll, 1990 Issue Statement: Resolution declaring costs to be assessed for alley maintenance and snowplowing for the period January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1989, and setting a public hearing date for City Project No. 845, 1989 Alley Maintenance. Background: The cost incurred for alley maintenance and snowplowing for the period January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1989 has been determined to be $17,725.98. The actual 1988 cost was 58,453.93. The 1989 estimated cost was 520,000 which includes initiation of a concrete point sealing maintenance program for alleys. Property owners on permanently paved concrete alleys are assessed for snowplowing, sweeping and joint repair costs only, while property owners on all other alleys are assessed actual maintenance costs for their individual alley and snowplowing costs. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution declaring the costs to be assessed and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment roll; and the attached resolution setting the date of hearing on the proposed assessment for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Council ordered this work to be done. 2. Adoption of the resolutions at this time will allow adequate time for staff to complete necessary legal requirements in order to meet certification deadlines. Alternative Recommendation: Council may revise the special assessment roll as deemed necessary after the public hearing. Discussion/Decision Mode: Council may choose to delay action on the attached resolution; however, Minnesota State Law requires specific notices and public meetings, and scheduling problems may occur beyond a two week delay. ully submitted, James Prosser City nager JDP/reb Attachment ~~-i RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 1989 ALLEY MAINTENANCE AND SNOWPLOW ING - CITY PROJECT NO. 845 WHEREAS, costs have been .determined for the maintenance and snowplowing o f the following alleys in the City of Richfield. The expenses incurred or to be incurred for such maintenance and snowplowing f or the period of January I, 1989 through December 31, 1989 amou nt to $17,725.98. rounding Avenues S Surrounding Streets Number ur 1001 Xerxes - Washburn 66th - 67th 1002 Xerxes - Washburn 67th - 68th 1003 Xerxes - Washburn 68th - 69th 1004 Xerxes - Washburn 69th - 70th 1005 Washburn - Vincent 66th - 67th 1006 Washburn - Vincent 67th - 68th 1007 Washburn - Vincent 68th - 69th 1008 Washburn - Vincent .69th - 70th 1009 Vincent - Upton 66th - 67th 1010 Vincent - Upton 67th - 68th 1011 Vincent - Upton 68th - 69th 1012 Vincent - Upton 69th - 70th 1013. Upton - Thomas 66th - 67th 1014 Upton - Thomas 68th - 69th 1015 Upton - Thomas 69th - 70th 1016 Thomas - Sheridan 66th - 67th 1017 Thomas - Sheridan 67th - 68th 1018 Thomas - Sheridan 68th - 69th 1019. Thomas - Sheridan 69th - 70th ~.~'_ a Page 2 - Resolution No. 1020 Sheridan - Russell 66th - 67th 1021 Sheridan - Russell 67th= 68th 1022 Sheridan - Russell 68th - 69th 1023 Sheridan - Russell 69th - 70th 1024 Russell - Queen 66th - 67th 1025 Russell - Queen 67th - 68th 1026 Russell - Queen 68th - 69th 1027 Russell - Queen 69th - 70th 1028 Queen - Penn 66th.- 67th 1029 Queen - Penn 67th - 68th 1030 Queen - Penn 68th - 69th 1031 Queen - Penn 69th - 70th 2001 . Penn - Oliver 63rd - 64th 2002 Oliver - Newton 63rd - 64th 2004 Morgan - Logan 63rd - 64th 2005 Logan - Knox 63rd - 64th 2007 James - Irving 63rd - 64th 2008 Irving - Humboldt 63rd - 64th 2009 Humboldt - Girard 63rd - 64th 2010 Girard- Fremont (35W) 63rd - 64th 2011 Girard - Fremont (35W) 64th - 65th 2012 Girard - Fremont (35W) 65th - 66th 2013 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 64th - 65th 2014 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 65th - 66th 2015 Dupont - Colfax 63rd - Mildred 2016 Colfax - Bryant 63rd - Mildred A 1 ~ 3 - Resolution No. Page 3 2017 Bryant - Aldrich 63rd - Mildred 2019 Graham - Lyndale 66th = Lk Shr Dr 2020 Aldrich - Lyndale 75th - 76th 2021 Aldrich - Lyndale 76th - 77th 3002 Lyndale - Garfield 68th - 69th 3003 Augsburg - Garfield 70th - 71st 3004 Augsburg - Garfield 71st - 72nd 3005 Lyndale - Garfield. 72nd - 73rd 3006 Lyndale - Garfield 73rd - 74th 3007 Garfield - Harriet 71st - 72nd 3008 Garfield - Harriet 72nd - 73rd 3009 Garfield - Harriet 73rd - 74th 3011 Harriet - Grand 67th - 68th 3012 Harriet - Grand 68th - 69th 3013 Harriet - Grand 72nd - 73rd 3014 Harriet - Grand 73rd - 74th 3015 Grand - Pleasant 68th - 69th 3016 Grand - Pleasant 72nd - 73rd 3018 Wentworth - Blaisdell 67th - 68th 3020 Blaisdell - Nicollet 72nd - 73rd 3021 Blaisdell - Nicollet 73rd - 74th 3022 Blaisdell - Nicollet 74th - 75th 3023 Blaisdell - Nicollet 75th - 76th 3024 Nicollet - 2nd Avenue 68th - 69th 3025 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 70th - 71st 3026 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 71st - 72nd ~~~-~ Resolution No. Page 4 3027 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3028 1st - Stevens 71st - 72nd 3029 1st - Stevens 72nd - 73rd 3030 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3031 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3032 2nd - 3rd Avenue 66th - 67th 3033 2nd - 3rd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3034 2nd - 3rd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3035 3rd - Clinton 66th - 67th 3036 3rd - Clinton 73rd - 74th 3037 Clinton - 4th Avenue 66th - 67th 3038 Clinton - 4th Avenue 73rd - 74th 3039 4th - 5th Avenue 66th - 67th 3040 4th - 5th Avenue 73rd - 74th 4001 13th - 14th Avenue 65th - 66th 4002 14th - 15th Avenue 62nd - 63rd 4004 15th - Bloomington 62nd - 63rd 4005 15th - Bloomington 65th - 66th 4006 Bloomington - 16th Avenue 65th - 66th 4007 Cedar - Longfellow 63rd - 64th 4008 Cedar - Longfellow 64th - 65th 4009 Cedar - Longfellow 65th. - 66th 4012 22nd - Standish 65th - 66th 4013 13th - 14th Avenue 66th - 67th NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: /'~ Resolution No. Page 5 1. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $17,725.98. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such maintenance against e~aery assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected, without regard to cash valuation as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk ~~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 1989 ALLEY MAINTENANCE - CITY PROJECT NO. 845 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield on June 11, 1990, the City Clerk was directed to prepare assessment of the cost of maintaining the following alleys in the City of Richfield for the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989. Number Surrounding Avenues Surrounding Streets 1001 Xerxes - Washburn 66th - 67th 1002 Xerxes - Washburn 67th - 68th 1003 Xerxes - Washburn 68th - 69th 1004 Xerxes - .Washburn 69th - 70th 1005 Washburn - Vincent 66th - 67th 1006 Washburn - Vincent 67th - 68th 1007 Washburn - Vincent 68th - 69th 1008 Washburn - Vincent 69th - 70th 1009 Vincent - Upton 66th - 67th 1010 Vincent - Upton 67th - 68th 1011 Vincent - Upton 68th - 69th 1012 Vincent - Upton 69th - 70th 1013 Upton - Thomas 66th - 67th 1014 Upton - Thomas 68th - 69th 1015 Upton - Thomas 69th - 70th 1016 Thomas - Sheridan 66th - 67th 1017 Thomas - Sheridan 67th - 68th 1018, Thomas - Sheridan 68th - 69th 1019 Thomas - Sheridan 69th - 70th 1020 Sheridan - Russell 66th_- 67th ~ 5~ -~ Resolution No. Page 2 1021 Sheridan - Russell 67th - 68th 1022 Sheridan - Russell 68th i 69th 1023 Sheridan - Russell 69th - 70th 1024 Russell - Queen 66th - 67th 1025 Russell - Queen 67th.- 68th 1026 Russell - Queen 68th - 69th 1027 Russell - Queen 69th - 70th 1028 Queen - Penn 66th - 67th 1029 Queen - Penn 67th - 68th 1030 Queen - Penn 68th - 69th 1031 Queen - Penn 69th - 70th 2001 Penn - Oliver 63rd - 64th 2002 Oliver - Newton 63rd - 64th 2004 Morgan - Logan 63rd - 64th 2005 Logan - Knox 63rd - 64th 2007 James - Irving 63rd - 64th 2008 Irving - Humboldt 63rd - 64th 2009 Humboldt - Girard 63rd - 64th 2010 Girard - Fremont (35W) 63rd - 64th 2011 Girard - Fremont (35W) 64th - 65th 2012 Girard - Fremont (35W) 65th - 66th 2013 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 64th - 65th 2014 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 65th - 66th 2015 Dupont - Colfax 63rd - Mildred 2016 Colfax - Bryant 63rd - Mildred 2017 Bryant - Aldrich 63rd - Mildred ~~ ~~ Resolution No. Page 3 2019 Graham - Lyndale 66th - Lk Shr Dr 2020 Aldrich - Lyndale 75th _ 76th 2021 ~ Aldrich - Lyndale 76th - 77th 3002 Lyndale - Garfield 68th - 69th 3003 Augsburg - Garfield 70th - 71st 3004 Augsburg - Garfield 71st - 72nd 3005 Lyndale - Garfield 72nd - 73rd 3006 Lyndale - Garfield 73rd - 74th 3007 Garfield - Harriet 71st - 72nd 3008 Garfield - Harriet 72nd - 73rd 3009 Garfield - Harriet 73rd - 74th 3011 Harriet - Grand 67th - 68th 3012 Harriet - Grand 68th - 69th 3013 Harriet - Grand 72nd - 73rd 3014 Harriet - Grand 73rd - 74th 3015 Grand - Pleasant 68th - 69th 3016 Grand - Pleasant 72nd - 73rd 3018 Wentworth - Blaisdell 67th - 68th 3020 Blaisdell - Nicollet 72nd - 73rd 3021 Blaisdell - Nicollet 73rd - 74th 3022 Blaisdell - Nicollet 74th - 75th 3023 Blaisdell - Nicollet 75th - 76th 3024 Nicollet - 2nd Avenue 68th - 69th 3025 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 70th - 71st 3026 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 71st - 72nd 3027 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 72nd - 73rd ~~~ Page 4 Resolu tion No. 3028 1st - Stevens 71st - 72nd 3029 1st - Stevens 72nd - 73rd 3030 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3031 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3032 2nd - 3rd Avenue 66th - 67th 3033 2nd - 3rd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3034 2nd - 3rd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3035 3rd - Clinton 66th - 67th 3036 3rd - Clinton 73rd - 74th 3037 Clinton - 4th Avenue 66th - 67th 3038 Clinton - 4th Avenue 73rd - 74th 3039 4th - 5th Avenue 66th - 67th 3040 4th - 5th Avenue 73rd - 74th 4001 13th - 14th Avenue 65th - 66th 4002 14th - 15th Avenue 62nd - 63rd 4004 15th - Bloomington 62nd - 63rd 4005 15th - Bloomington 65th - 66th 4006 Bloomington - 16th Avenue 65th - 66th 4007 Cedar - Longfellow 63rd - 64th 4008 Cedar - Longfellow 64th - 65th 4009 Cedar - Longfellow 65th - 66th 4012 22nd - Standish 65th - 66th 4013 13th - 14th Avenue 66th - 67th the City Clerk has notified the City Council that WHEREAS such , proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: ~5~-1u Resolution No. 1. A hearing shall be held on the in the Council Chambers of the City Hall thereafter as the matter may be reached upon such proposed assessment. At such persons owning property affected by said will be given an opportunity ter be heard assessment. Page 5 23rd day of July, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon on the agenda, to pass time and place all maintenance assessment in reference to such 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at ,least two weeks prior to the hearing. He shall state in the notice the total cost of the maintenance, and also caused mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll, not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of June, 1990. teven J. Quam, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk ~~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 150 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Approval of resolution declaring costs to be assessed for removal of diseased trees from private property for the period January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1989, and approval of resolution setting date of hearing. Background: The costs to be assessed for the removal of Dutch Elm diseased trees on private property for the period of January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1989 have been determined to be $17,519.45. The property owner of a diseased tree has four options available: 1. Remove the tree themselves.. 2. Hire and pay their own contractor. 3. Hire the City's contractor and pay for the removal within 30 days, or 4. Use the City's contractor and request that the cost of the tree removal be assessed .against their property tax. In the period from January 1, 1989 to December 31, 1989, 36 property owners chose the fourth option. The original source of funding to have the work done is through the City's Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund. The property owner may prepay the special assessment, but if it is certified on or before October 10, 1990, for the 1990 taxes, the interest rate is eight percent .with payment spread over three years. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment roll, and adopt the Resolution setting the date of hearing on the proposed assessment for July 23, 1990. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The work has been done with prior approval from the affected residents. 2. Minnesota State Stature requires the County to be notified of all special assessments. Alternative Recommendation: Council may revise the special assessment roll as deemed necessary following the public hearing. ~"5~-~ Discussion/Decision Mode: All work was performed with prior approval from home owners. Staff is requesting adoption of the attached resolutions at this time in order to meet certification deadlines. Respect ly submitted, Jame D. Prosser City Manager JDP/reb Attachments ~5K-~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1989 TO DECEMBER 31, 1989. WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the removal of diseased trees from the fallowing private properties in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for such work during the period of January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989 amount to $17,519.45. Property Address 6236 Bloomington Ave. 6311 15th Avenue 2020 West 68th Street 7329 Colfax Avenue 7626 Nicollet Avenue 7401 Dupont Avenue 6314 14th Avenue 6505 Irving Avenue 6520 23rd Avenue 6435 Oliver Avenue 6344 Irving Avenue 6512 22nd Avenue 400-402 West 64th Street 6627 15th Avenue 6500 22nd. Avenue 7326 Stevens Avenue 6644 Pleasant Avenue 7419 Pillsbury Avenue 7513 Aldrich Avenue 6708 1st Avenue 6704 Russell Avenue 6420 17th Avenue 6945 18th Avenue 2500 West 66th Street 6325 22nd Avenue 7016 Columbus Avenue 7414 18th Avenue 6317 21st Avenue 6434 Humboldt Avenue b812 Emerson Avenue 6829 20th Avenue 6600 Columbus Avenue 6449 Girard Avenue 6305 Bloomington Avenue 6629 Lynwood Boulevard 6633 Lynwood Boulevard Property Identification Number 26-02824-12-0049 26-02824-12-0117 28-02824-32-0103 33-02824-14-0051 34-02824-34-0006 33-02824-41-0082 26-02824-12-0138 28-02824-24-0147 25-02824-24-0117 28-02824-23-0075 28-02824-21-0007 25-02824-24-0012 27-02824-22-0075 26-02824-42-0011 25-02824-24-0014 34-02824-13-0033 27-02824-32-0031 34-02824-31-0045 33-02824-41-0166 27-02824-42-0013 29-02824-41-0095 26-02824-14-0016 26-02824-44-0073 29-02824-14-0059 25-02824-21-0019 35-02824-22-0012 35-02824-41-0008 25-02824-21-0041 28-02824-24-0008 28-02824-42-0090 25-02824-33-0011 26-02824-32-0004 28-02824-13-0011 26-02824-11-0031 28-02824-41-0031 28-02824-41-0032 ~5~-3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The total cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $17,519.45. 2. The city clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such work against each benefited property, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, THIS 11th DAY OF JUNE, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~ 5~- ~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1989 TO DECEMBER 31, 1989. WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by .the City Council of the City of Richfield on June 11, 1990, the city clerk. was directed to prepare the assessment of the cost of removing diseased trees from the following private properties in the City of Richfield for the period January 1, 1989 through December 31, 1989. Pr ~erty Address Pro~ert~ Identification Number 6236 Bloomington Ave. 6311 15th Avenue 2020 .West 68th Street 7329 Colfax Avenue 7626 Nicollet Avenue 7401 Dupont Avenue 6314 14th Avenue 6505 Irving Avenue 6520 23rd Avenue 6435 Oliver Avenue 6344 Irving Avenue 6512 22nd Avenue 400-402 West 64th Street 6627 15th Avenue 6500 22nd Avenue 7326 Stevens Avenue 6644 Pleasant Avenue 7419 Pillsbury Avenue 7513 Aldrich Avenue 6708 1st Avenue 6704 Russell Avenue 6420 17th Avenue 6945 18th Avenue 2500 West 66th Street 632522nd Avenue 7016 Columbus Avenue 7414 18th Avenue 6317 21st Avenue 6434 Humboldt Avenue 6812 Emerson Avenue 6829 20th Avenue 6600 Columbus Avenue 6449 Girard Avenue 6305 Bloomington Avenue 6629 Lynwood Boulevard 6633 Lynwood Boulevard 26-02824-12-0049 26-02824-12-0117 28-02824-32-0103 33-02824-14-0051 34-02824-34-0006 33-02824-41-0082 26-02824-12-0138 28-02824-24-0147 25-02824-24-0117 28-02824-23-0075 28-02824-21-0007 25-02824-24-0012 27-02824-22-0075 26-02824-42-0011 25-02824-24-0014 34-02824-13-.0033 27-02824-32-0031 34-02824-31-0045 33-02824-41-0166 27-02824-42-0013 29-02824-41-0095 26-02824-14-0016 26-02824-44-0073 29-02824-14-0059 25-02$24-21-0019 35-02824-22-0012 35-02824-41-0008 25-02824-21-0041 28-02824-24-0008 28-02824-42-0090 25-02824-33-0011 26-02824-32-0004 28-02824-13-0011 26-02824-11-0031 28-02824-41-0031 28-02824-41-0032 WHEREAS, the city clerk has notified the City Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection. ~ 5~ ~~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of July, 1990, in the city hall council chambers at 7 p.m., or as soon as .hereafter as it may be reached on the agenda, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said diseased tree removal assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the diseased tree removal. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA THIS 11th DAY OF JUNE, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 151 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Public. hearing and second reading of an ordinance .amendment to change name of the Grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. Background: Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. is the current Grantee under the cable communications ordinances (or "Franchises") of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield. Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. (Rogers) desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. Rogers is requesting approval of the name change from the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission and its Member Cities. Rogers does not intend to make any changes to its corporate structure or to the control of its operations, but it simply desires to change its name. Since this is only a name change and not a change in corporate structure, Member Cities may indicate approval by Resolution. On May 14, 1990, the Richfield City Council indicated approval by passing the Resolution (attached). KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. and its parent companies have already acknowledged that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. is the corporate successor of Rogers, and the parent companies have also reaffirmed their status as guarantors of KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc.'s rights and obligations under the Franchise (see Acknowledgment and Consent attachment). On March 22, 1990, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) prepared and passed a resolution adopting the name change (see Resolution attachment). Counsel for the SWSCC has also prepared a model resolution and model ordinance for use by the Member Cities to approve the name change, should they decide to do so. Richfield's proposed Ordinance Amendment is attached. The first reading of the Ordinance Amendment was held on May 14, 1990. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution and Ordinance Amendment approving the name change of Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. Basis of Recommendation: 1. This is only a change of name, not of corporate structure. 2. KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. and its parent companies issued an Acknowledgment and Consent that KBL ~~~I Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. is the corporate successor of Rogers, and that the parent companies reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc.'s rights and obligations under the Franchise. 3. SWSCC adopted a Resolution approving the name change. 4. It is anticipated that the other four Member Cities will also pass resolutions and ordinance amendments. approving the name change. Alternative Recommendation: rove the name change. 1. The Council may choose not to app However, SWSCC has already reviewed the request and found no reason to disapprove the request. Discussion/Decision Mode: The City Council may hold a public hearing and approve the attached Ordinance Amendment at the June ll, 1990 City Council meeting. Respec f ly submitted, James Prosser City Manager JDP:ff ~ I~-2, ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX NO. E2 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE TO CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraph J of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: J. "Grantee" is Rege~s-Gab}esys~ems-of-eke Sex~l3Wes~; -~rieT; -a-P9iaAese~a-ee~ge~a~#er; KBL Cables stems of the Southwest Inca a Minnesota corporation d/b/a Paragon Cable. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after adoption and publication, provided that it shall become effective only if all of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield adopt an ordinance similar to this ordinance within sixty (60) days after the adoption of this Ordinance. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk RESOLUTION N0. 7625 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL TO A CHANGE OF NAME OF GRANTEE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. D/B/A PARAGON CABLE WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ("RCTSI") is the .current grantee under the cable communications ordinance ("Franchise") of the City of Richfield, Minnesota ("City"); and WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d/b/a Paragon Cable ("KBLCSI") and has requested the City's approval of the name change; and WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership structure or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its name; and WHEREAS, KBL Cable, Inc. ("KBLC") and KBLCOM Incorporated ("KBLCOM") are the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchise pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to the City; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("SWSCC") reviewed the request for approval of RCTSI's name change and found no reason to disapprove of the request, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first acknowledge and agree in a writing acceptable to SWSCC's member cities that KBLCSI is the corporate successor of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchise and that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's as guarantors of KBLCSO's obligations under the Franchise; and WHEREAS, the City loins in the foregoing findings of SWSCC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: roves the Chan a of 1. The City hereby consents to and app 9 the name of the grantee under the Franchise from Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d/b/a Paragon Cable, provided KBLCOM Incorporates, KBL Cable, Inc., and KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. first file with the City and Acceptance and Consent in a form and substance acceptable to the City. 2. .The City declares that as of the time of this Resolution, the Franchise and all agreements entered into by RCTSI in connection therewith shall remain in full force and effect, except that KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. shall be deemed to have been substituted as grantee and shall be obligated as RCTSI's successor in interest to perform all of RCTSI's duties and obligations thereunder. ~~-~ Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 14th day of May, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ~~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ?,ND CONSENT Parties: KBL Cable, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("KBLC"). KBLCOM, Incorporated, a Texas corporation ("KBLCOM"). KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota corporation d/b/a Paragon Cable ("KBLCSI"). Effective Date: March 20, 1990. Recitals: 1. Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ("RCTSI"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of KBLC (which is a wholly-owned. subsidiary of KBLCOM), is the current grantee under the cable communications ordinances (the "Franchises") of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota (collectively, the "Cities"). 2. KBLC and KBLCOM are the corporate guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchises pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance between KBLC, KBLCOM, and each City ("Guaranty"). 3. RCTSI desires to change its name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc.. and has requested the approval of each City to do so. 4. The Cities are willing to consent to the name change, provided KBLC, KBLCOM and KBLCSI acknowledge in writing that KBLCSI is the successor of RCTSI for all purposes related to the Franchises and that the Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect. (p ~Sp Acknowledgement and Agreements: 1. KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI hereby acknowledge and agree that KBLCSI is the successor in interest to RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchises and the Guaranty (including the Guaranteed Documents as defined in the Guaranty). 2. KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI represent and warrant to the Cities that RCTSI intends only to change its corporate name to KBL Cablesystems of the. Southwest, Inc.., and that no changes in the ownership or control of RCTSI will occur as a result of this name change. 3. KBLC and KBLCOM acknowledge and agree that they remain fully bound under the Guaranty as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchises and the Guaranteed Documents (as defined in the Guaranty). KBLC and KBLCOM hereby waive any defenses to the enforcement of the Guaranty based on RCTSI's change of its name to KBLCSI. KBL CABLE, INC. By Its Vice President cretar & Treasurer KBLCOM INCORPORATED C~~~ ~ ~ By its ice resi ent, ec tary Treasurer KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. B ~'~~~~ y Its Vice President cretarv & Treasurer -~- ~ ~ -~ RESOLUTION RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF NAME CHANGE FROM ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. TO KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ("RCTSI") is the current grantee under the cable communication franchises granted pursuant to the cable communication ordinances (collectively, the "Franchises") of the Cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Richfield, Minnesota ("Member Cities"); and WHEREAS, RCTSI desires to change its name to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, inc., d/b/a Paragon Cable ("KBLCSI") and has requested the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("SWSCC") and its Member Cities to the approve the name change; and WHEREAS, RCTSI does not intend to make any changes to its ownership struc- ture or to the control of its operations, but desires only to change its name; and wTiEREAS, KBL Cable, Inc. ("KBLC") and KBLCOM Incorporated ("KBLCOM") are the guarantors of RCTSI's obligations under the Franchises pursuant to a Consent Agreement and Guaranty of Performance given to each Member City; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("SWSCC") has reviewed the request for approval of RCTSI's name change and has found no reason to disap- prove of the request, provided that KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI acknowledge and agree in a writins acceptable to the Member Cities that KBLCSI is the corporate successpr of RCTSI for all purposes under the Franchises and all agreements ~,~ related thereto, and further provided that KBLC and KBLCOM reaffirm their status as guarantors of KBLCSI's obligations under the Franchises. NOW, THEREFORE, at a regularly scheduled meeting of SWSCC, SWSCC resolves as follows: SWSCC hereby approves and recommends to the Member Cities that each of them consent to and approve RCTSI's request for a name change to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., d/b/a Paragon Cable, provided KBLC, KBLCOM, and KBLCSI first execute .and deliver to each riember City an Acknowledgement and Consent in a form satisfactory to the Member Cities. Dated this ~/'~ day of ~/~ ~ 1990. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION /~. By ~'~~~- ' /~-- rte, ~ ZtsTChai~rpQtson -~- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 152 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Public hearing on a request for a conditional use permit at 7440 Penn Avenue South. Background: Hennepin Technical College - Intermediate District #287 is requesting a conditional use permit to operate the Parent-Infant Education (P.I.E.) Day-Care Program located at Lincoln Hills Center, 7440 Penn Avenue South. The P.Z.E. Day-Care Program has been in existence since September 1985, and serves high school age parents and their infant/toddler children ages 6 weeks to 2 1/2 years. Recent changes in the state licensing program have brought the conditional use permit requirement to the attention of the Petitioner and City. This conditional use permit will allow the continued operation of the P.I.E. Day-Care Program which serves 20-25 children. The program operates from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and employs four teachers. The Lincoln Hills Center property is zoned R-Residence (single family}. A day-care center is permitted in this district, with a conditional use permit. Recommended Motion: Approve the conditional use permit for the Parent-Infant Education .Day-Care Program at Lincoln Hills Center, 7440 Penn Avenue South, provided all building and fire codes are met. Basis of Recommendation: 1. At the April 24, 1990 regular meeting of the Planning Commission, the Commission voted 8-0 to recommend approval of this conditional use permit. 2. The P.I.E. Day-Care Program has been in existence since September, 1985. Issuance of the conditional use permit would not cause any changes to the existing facility or parking arrangements. 3. The Lincoln Hills Center is used primarily for special education programs. The P.I.E. Day-Care Program is compatible with other programs in the facility. 4. There is adequate parking on the vacated 75th street and adjacent church parking lot. 5. Adequate play area for the children is available on the site. Alternative Recommendation: The City Council may deny the conditional use permit if a finding of fact determines that the conditional use permit would have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on June 11, 1990. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South. Notice of hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the property. Resp ly submitted, James Prosser City ager JDP:cak ~~ ~ w w w .-r M : •: - ~ 2 i r • r ~ r ~- • -~ ~ ~ >: r/ ti ~ ~ 1' rtlOr~as i~ ~~~ O = u Il . _ _ I' LI `/ W T1 • M w M w M M r ~ rem ~~._~.I ..l.l~ I 'i Q - ? - - r Y ~ r~ _ SST=*+~+w.r.Aa.iw~~,~_°-_~__-_ _.. _ _ -_ _ ---~.1 ~C:= _..-. w0"17t9w0'1 ., LI (` ICI ~:^.Ju~l --~:. II ~ ..~~~~ ~I i!1~ . I .111 ' II ~r-~ I~:~~~~^ ~ ~ ` ~ ., i w617wIw00'ti ~'';-~• ~-~ - ~ ~ w011w1w007 •1 it ~^ ~ --I~I a it •1.1 ~ .1 ~ I~ 11 i 1 , II ~ r '~'I 'I ~ •1 •1 it ~ ~ ~ ~ u LI 1~=1 I) ~ II MY •1 11 "~~ ~~ ~_ ~ rl 11 11 OI III I '~ i .i- _ ~~ ~i 1'.N •. OI Ol17iM0 ~11 ~ a ,~ .1 ~~1 it v ^ ~. ~, r Olt91M9 intwmo~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~I I I "1 snlwn~oD ,' L -1 ~;a tr.r ~~i ~ H ~~ " • •rN !;li -~'1 7At OrP'..rOV 1 =~' " i N r ~ 1 ~ _.; :~ - ~ .1. ~ MOa MI :~ 11 YI ~- j wO. w17 t1) r't ~~ ' r.T •1 / r. _ 1 r. _ d. 1 ~ fr7A71t r. 1 ~ Tw7A31i W 1.. ~--- = a~ ,a )At L7r0~lr ~~~-_ -_ 7wt :7`~O~Iw X70 i111i ~:_ ~1 ~ ''\~ "'t70 il~lt MarO~aM)~ 11' --~' I ~ ,~ ratO~LM)~ Z - ' ~ 1, i I I' \ r 71rrtM ~1 =s ~- ~ .:::~. ~:~.y:S:~i i::~'~'• =~~ .7lrrtw Z .~ /~ ~ li W )A• 7~tOww1 ] ^ ~ ~ ~~~~y ~ 7A• 7'IOrL1 Q a wDIrC1• I IIC~ ~!^i „~/r• -I~yw,c'IfiPCj2~ij ~~~ wl,r0~1 U ~ .wtart ~;C~ /~ =_/ ~..~.r'r.,SYt ~ a ~~ aw..rt tts •W ., _~~ Y ~ ~ .~ ~~I~ to •07 lr.ry i sl lw~wr~ ~~__- ~~ ice` r ~ - ~ 1 lwlwrl --. i'.. >:Ot -. .I S7w.r tort nl ~ ~ - .:::::::::.:w tOwr "~';'~ w.lrow ;7 rri: ;: r)w110 ~ ~ ~s .~ ~~ ~~ ~ r7w110 Tom`- .S•! ^71n0 7rwOra ~~ . ~ ~ . _~ . _ ... _ ~ _ ~~~ ~ ~ 1 S~wOra rOarn -___-~ ________- __ __._ ___ • w • M M M w M M M M i. A A ~ N M M w ~ 1 a • • ~ • • • ~ ~ ~ - + . - . - . • - J sW i J ~ _Z ~Z W -a 0 ti W Q Q U Q w N O a O ~ Z a S 3Ab NN3d ~ ' I-.~ . ZONING ~ ~~ `~ 7440 PENN AVE. S. ~C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS MR-1 TWO FAMILY RESIDENCES ~ MR-3 17AND MORE UNIT RESIDENCES ~C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ~ MR-2 3-i6 UNIT RESIOENCES Q MR MUITiPLE DWELLING N ~__ ~~~_ \\ i i I Q ~ Z W i U I ~ -.:4.. ,~ 0 ~--~-.~ ~__'~' r __ ~ I ---- N a > ~ > 73RD 57. W. w ~' a ~ a Q C 2 ~ W Z ~ ~ W N N W W _ ~ I ~ C. H 76TH 77TH . W. S ST. W. ~~ ~~:-~- LAND USE 7440 PENN AVE, S. COMMERCIAL ~ APARTMENT ®OUASI•PUBUC INDUSTRIAL Q DUPLEX i'~., PARK SCHOOL --- I ---- ,~,~. ~~~ N ~~~ D ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I ( I i i I N i N > < I Q j 73RD ST. W. ui 1Q1 I Fri I 1a1 I~~ N a I a > n Q ~ I a 2 ~ w I W N to W w _ ~ I tr Q I I ( I I I n i! Q Z Z w TH ST :;' _ _ - . S ST. W. I ~~~ ~ =_ ~'~'4° COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7440 PENN AVE. S. Q MEDIUM DENSITY/BUFFER ~ MULTIPLE RESIDENCE ~ PARK FREEWAY STRIP :. -~ '`~;: INSTITUTIONAL N Q I Q _G I ~ Q . . ... ~ ~ L: W W (A 2 W , . . H 4TH ST. WW CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 153 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Public hearing on an amendment to an off-street parking permit for 1537 East 66th Street. Background: Applicant John Erickson, is the owner of Richfield Gold Eagle Wash, 1537 East 66th Street. The existing off-street parking permit requires a seven-foot redwood fence on the south property line and that the area south of the building be sodded and kept available for additional parking area if needed. The business has not expanded to the extent where additional parking has been necessary so it has remained sodded. In January, applicant requested an amendment which would allow him to sell the southerly 70 feet of the property and erect a filled-in chain link fence dust behind the building instead of-the .southerly property line. The City Council continued the matter until this meeting to allow the applicant time to initiate the subdivision process or determine a course of action. Applicant is now requesting an amendment to repair and replace the existing redwood fence on the southerly property line with a seven foot cedar fence. The property is zoned C-2 general commercial district and dry cleaners are a permitted use in this district. Recommended Motion: Approve the amendment to the existing off-street parking permit with the following stipulation: 1. That the entire fence be painted or stained a consistent color. Basis of Recommendation: 1. An off-street parking permit was granted on March 13, 1961. 2. The parking requirement of 21 spaces continues to be met. 3. The special regulations for parking areas would be met by a screening fence and a landscaped side yard of at least 15 feet . 4. A cedar fence would adequately screen the commercial use from the neighboring residential property. Alternative Recommendation: The City Council may recommend denial of the amendment to the off-street parking permit if a finding of fact determines that the proposal would have an adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. ~~-~ Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on June 11, 1990. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South. Notice of public hearing was mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the property. Respectf ly submitted, Jam Prosser City Manager JDP:e~a Z O alb O W W H a W T r r r l ~ t t Y Y r r •~ Cz ~-r Mt10M t1{ _~~I .Y:z u~C •l i1 [~~~C ~C'tla19N0, f 7At YtOa~ '- ~C^ .,.~ I` ru •111 ~:.~~ ./,I M01'J«1w001f ~~C~C .I fI CC~C~ .,.~ „f, ~uOC •I:i ~~~'`uL .111 ~IC~~u~ I .J ~~ .101 I~ lOt„7 i~ o W fMwmpp ,~I ~ oNt,,.o I I ~ , r~ ,~ 7At OM~,lYOr •If • u• ~~ MO1M1,0 , ..t I '~L l I~_.~i f N7AalL ~'~.~~ J PI I I •aAt li„OOIM ~~`' „aosl.,a II w1Y0/11N)r I ~ f i ~ I jYnrrnlr ~ 1iIJl _~~ oNtro ;~ ~'uu+ laIYY.M II ~I~(`~I ~~ o,awYtro Iii ~~t~i~ 'aAI aM1tOMl, }I.~1I NOIYO,t t' ( C ~a I f 1wtAY• Iii ~ ~ Yr ~~ lwwno ;1 ~ s MOLYaRa ~ ~\`~ ~~ OYIYfO ~ __u 1"-~' 1010Nwn« ,~ ~~~ ~c~~~ >/NIAY1 ,°oo tawtr tONi I ~^r Nt00, ' ~I` I~~i wtrsrow ,_~~Or wol.aN l Y7AI,O ~-'~ ~-~' aAt YNa. ~ ~u~l w7an0 ''~r l It „assnY ~I` ~~ w.olra«t -- t~: -c N NOlrM1 _--~- 1M70MIA 1 MYnYNf tr ^-~^^r i~ Yl M N M T V Y Y 1~0 N N g N N M N ~0 Y ~ 1 ~~ _I J M M rl Y .~ Y r w ~Z [! ~ z Z .~ r 4 ~ 'Z 0 ~ (_.) H Yr u V W ~ ~ Z - -• .~-_~___________ ~~- ,+ aAt Y.03~ ~~ ~~ ~~I I~Ij I hit ' Y1(I ^~-~ MO1ON1w00'p ~r~ I~L ul :I '.1 YI ~ GI U~~•~ YI -I ~~ YI c. ~;-~~L,_uC~C-J-_ I~ Ylzi ^, ~'~ ~' a '-1 i M :: C~C~~~u.-... ~C~~~1~.~5 00.71«~ f' .;::::i;r.:; ~..;;~. C'-=.-'--~ ",,~ acre t f -i--iI ~~~, ON•,tfto . ^--I`-J ~~''~ 'aAt OMT11ypr ~~ r~ I f..~r~ Y! • LL II M01 I:I,J -=~ ..{ N -^ wZ ~ tMaAalL '3Ab' H19t ~fI ~f ,., `;~ ~nacst.,r x M1YOI~1Na/1 11 Ij,i pi IYMI„Ir r ~ ~I ONt YO 3A`d NOIJNIWOOlB ~ in~w« C,~ 'awt a,t/OM1, !!---C!--~~ I ~~ «OtYO,t O~~~i 1wtAYt O~QI JI Lt/,00 1MOrftO DC~~O~. NOSYaw7 ~° - la,wwnN 1~~-. Yt _--• rte-- - _~ • ~oo~ ~ ^~ ~~~., O/IIAY1 ~ ~, r-~ i .` saws jO ~~~C~ I ~ _ ~ - tcoNr C~u.C~C~ OO ""°' 1C~C~OC~ ~ IDC~ NteYOw N O11f 7M ~. ~C~ C~ ,~C=~ YaAI," :~~~ ~~~C~C~C~C~Iu -~- 'aAt MM71 ;~-- i~ ~~C~ lJ1J. I M7an0 -~ !~ "~ L~ I ~~ „aSSt1Y ~v_~ M101Y7«f i ,^-~~ ~~ `.rr. ~.w~-._ ~ ..._y+~~r.Yre•a/trs+sjs.-ewa-.caY-'~ aA1 taiYat M N N N N M ~ M M M w Mw S ~ • '~ r t Z Y 7: ~ s e ~ : . : . .. : ~ ~ .. e . 14 ~~~ PARKING PERMIT AMENDMENT 1537 EAST 66TH STREET 66TH ST. PROPERTY GOLD EAGLE f--! i WASH f-- ; ~ BUILDING ~- ~ ~- , or NI ~ 1 - X-k- X-X-- FORMERLY OPOSED~ FENCE LOCA tON J' >~ -- -- - YI EXISTING REDWOO FENCE TO BE REPLAC D WITH CEDAR FENCE THIS i~ i~ ,~ J LOCATION 1 N ~ RESIDENCE r fCALE / NCM = 10 FEET W Q !` ca r 1 I r r t ~I 1W ~ COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 153? EAST 66TH STREET N N N i W ' ~ v ~ r ! ~ . 65tH ST E I ss ( I ~ OcO1C^ C~ O~ CC^ O b C" 7 ~O O'~ O GC CO - C~ G,C `QQdQYf,,`~,,' O eej ,~ O 000 C O, CO 0 007G_ ;,O CO 0 ~O CC C ~O C~ 00o c' c„~°c: c cc1•••.c o ^o °c o o° oc c o° o0 ~oc oc o0 (COUNTY ROAD NO. 53) ~'G O C OO G ^,00 000000 . 0 0 0: O C`. C O O O O G O O N { I = N f t O _ O O O G 0 00 0 O 0 00 0 00 0 oa 66TH •oe°ocecco °~ °~ ° °o q°°oo.°° ° ° ~ ° . ~. ° o ° G G G_G°° ° c c c c c^ c °°°°°°'opo°°'° '° N 67TH ~;~ MIXED LAND USE °°°°° #AEDIUM DENSITY °°~°~ BUFFER INSTITUTIONAL PARK SINGLE FAMILY I z i 58TH • • . . . • • . . . . . ~... N N • • / • • • • • y~ ~ • • • > < < / • ••• • • • 2 S • • ••/•• ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • I `•/••• • • • • • • • • • • • / • + 1 I •/••r • • • •~,;, ... • • • • • • ^ • • s •. s •••••• ••••f• •••/••~ N ••••~•; ••••••r s / • / • • • / • ~ • t ~ / • t • 0 • •s•~s • / • ~' t • •~ / / • • • • • • • • • / • • / • / • • 1 • ' ~ • • • • • r • • • / • • • • • • ^ • _ ~~/~• / • • :0G 000 000 000 000 G00 •• ••• I • • • • •. • • • • 000 000 000 000 000 000 • • • •~/ • • • • i a0 0 0 0°0 00° o°o oo° • • •1•//•• • • ST E ST I I ST 00000000 00000000 o°o°o°o° o°o o°o° 0000 0 E ...... N ...... ....... •.•.•.1.•.•.• ~~~ i • • • • • • • • •••1•• • •~ ~ • ~ i • • • • • 00CC0000`~:OC`C0 G 0 G C O _ O 0 COOG, O CQ~ oaco ~oob~c~cooo o°octcoc °°cc°°° 0G0:~C oc`oo • °°G°°o :. oGC°c°o ~ ~ 0 00000 ..f< r ~0 C 0 S 0 0 ..~ ~ •••• ~r o c c c oooooc •• r r .•. :• 0 ~ . ~ ~ • 00 ~coc 2 t f i • 0 0000 • s s•i • s • f • ~; ° ° °°° p ° 000000 W .... • • 0 O 00000 t t • • • t 000000 y • • • t 0 O O O v ~ • • 0000000 •r. 0000000 . • • • r r LAND USE 1537 EAST 66TH STREET i N ~ ` ~ i ~ Q ~ ~ ~ = I "-~ ~ I 6S~ S ~ E N W i 0 ~ ~ ~' I W i 1 ~ ~ ~ i Z ~ ~ X "(COUNTY ROAD N0. 53) 66TH COMMERCIAL APARTMENT .,. . DUPLEX D SINGLE FAMILY QUASI PUBLIC PARK VACANT 67TH z ~ F- 68TH +.~.,, . .v"f' o;,;~j~^:.~ .~ ~~*, j ~~~a .~''vv. ~~~•• t ~~~ N N K { = I r -_ m 8~S N W G y y,~~ Gd • • X 5T E ST ... i i i i ~: W N ZONING X537 EAST 66TH STREET 65TH ST. i 1 i ~. I 1 1 i I 1 1 ~ < 1 ~ ~ <<< '~ b6TH \ C y< < [ l .. ~ .( .~ ~ ui C r a ~ a f ~ ~ ~ ~ 67TH ST. ~ m • R+IDUSTRIAL ~iTH ST. C_2 ""'7 GENERAL COMMERCML R ~ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ~ .... MR-1 ~ ... .,.,. :•:•: .TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE ~ PC-2 PLANNED GENERAL COMMERCIAL ~"~ ,~ i ~~ I i < t ~~ i ~.~. X '('< \ ~ ~~ <~ < ST. < .( < ! f ~~~ ~!~ i~~. W ~ Q S = ~ ~ r. o T}i sT. YI Q W V ~. .~ . ~. ~< < ~~ ~ [ Y << r .. << < < ~- << <~ N ~.<< <~<~< ~,<,~,~ VI CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.154 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: A public hearing on an appeal of the Hearing Examiner's denial o two variances requested at 7201 Penn Avenue South to allow construction of a twin home on an existing vacant lot. Sackcrround The applicant, John Oksness, has requested lot area and sideyar variances to allow the cncesrinclude f a twin home at 7201 Penn Avenue South. The varia 1) creation of a lot containing 6,198.5 square feet in a district `"'hline6sideyardasetback betweenmthemhomesquirement; 2 ) a zero ,lot The property is zoned R-residential and currently is one. lot. Applicant desires to sell each twin home separately. As a result, a request to subdivide the lot was submitted to the Planning Commission who voted 5-3 1°cant canngo forward with the variances are necessary before app subdivision. Originally, staff planned to present the appeal to the subdivision denial and the appeal to the variance denial to the Council at this meeting. The petitioner has not prepared the plat to permit presentation of subdivision at this time. Notice for variance denial appeal has been published. For a variance to be granted under state law and the local ordinance, it must be demonstrated that circumstances exist which are unique to the property. Compliance with the existing City Code must cause undue hardship to the applicant, and the property cannot be put to reasonable use without the variance. Recommended Motion: Deny the request for lot area and sideyard setback variances at 7201 Penn Avenue South. Basis of Recommendation: 1990. 1. The Hearing Examiner denied this request on May 1, 2. One loninilOrdinance does not providedfornamzeroolotiline 3. The Zo g for this type of development. 4. There are no unu~uximatelyr102mby1134tfeetloituisglarger although, at app than the normal lot. 5. Applicant received some five variances for a similar project at 7001 Portland Avenue South. 6. A single family homurrentdzoningnably be built on the existing lot with c ~~~~ 7. Applicant could build a twin home if he follows the procedure outlined in the "common element rThedPlanning subdivision" provisions (Section 500.09).. Commission considered this issue several years ago and developed the method. This permits separate ownership of individual dwelling units with designated common areas or facilities. It relates to issues such as common walls, lateral movement of structures and boundary lines•ro riate City Attorney and staff suggest this as a more app p method of dealing with potential problems concerning this type of development- Alternative Recommendation:, 1. The City Council may reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner and approve the variances for lot area and sideyard setback if the following factors exist: A. Circumstances exist which are unique to the property and not created by the landowner. B. Compliance with the existing City Code will cause undue hardship. to the applicant (economic considerations alone are not considered an undue hardship). C. The property cannot be put to reasonable use without the variances. 2. The Council may table appeal until the subdivision plat is prepared for review. Additionally, the Council may choose to ask the PlannriorCto considerationiof eithervissueplat of subdivision p Discussion/Decision Mode: m. on June 11, 1990. The A public hearing is scheduled at 7:00 p. hearing will be he~~landtAvenueySouthcil Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Po Notice of hearingithinp3501feet of the propertyent and mailed to property owners w Resp c lly submitted, Jame Prosser City nager JDP:cak v'..~ O W \`, W a T O N O Q 0 J __ ' ~ N N N N N N N Z Ii l2 ~ ~ NSIONtI! -~~0 ~ ~. ..~.. ~r 2i ~~I~ \ V U ~ 1~ It J: 1 ir-•TI .~.. _ L J L J L ~ ~.!~~~----~~1~ N N N N N N N N N YIOZ L-~`~C~ I'.~I O ~ a a a ~ a W w w rN. ~ w Op 1 I -+~ +wn3leNO~ - - - ~ M0113l9NO1 G=- ---- „----===__=_--- -- ------ _-uja______--- ~3At Yt037'~~' ~~~-_'____ 1 __.----- --____ ant Yt030 1111 ~-~~~~I~.J~I~J~/\v _~~'_~ ~ ~~_Ji rl` ~~ (i vi Ll YI LI ~ ~1r~ rte; ~~ NOlONIw001Y M019NIw00'tY Vl fil i~~: ~-~~~~~ V1•1 ~~ ~~ VI .1 VI 21 ~J~~J ~I~JC~I.~+' ~' ~~ I~~~i. ll~l__,'~~~ Vi 2t V111 `IL~I ''~~J~~I~L~~.II 7Q ''~ ~_~_~JJ~ II'!~ V111 YI OI I~ / ~.~/ OC~~:C~I ~ I_,~ ~~ ~~~~ :l ii V1 OI I C~OC~~~= ~~C-C~~C~ul ill1 101~~3 1 ~-^ ~^ ^~ ~ ~ ~ 11on13 OOtOINO I u a Ol.~l_Jul._~~_J~'~L_i~'J _a l OOt01N0 sn~emo~ II J J C~n~CC~~'I,~C~C~C!~!! 'i'~~ snawnioo 3At ON•11Y0/ ~11~~J~-'~ "3At ON•11N0/ i ,~ JI_~1~ ~~,~ YIf vls _ _~r n l( NO1N110 ~ 'I N01NI10 ~ i 0~2 I svZ SN3A315 II I ,~i ~ SN3A31S '3At 1311001N I,..~ ! 1 ~~__~~ '3At 1311001N 113asn1f I~I~~' ~'3/1bt NN d i^_\ P 113051.10 ~ ~u N1110M1N3M ~~ "-- N1i0A11N3~ I~~~! li 'li AynYS111/ Arrnaml/ Iii1;1; '~--~1' I11~' ~ 1 131YY•M I ~ '~~ •~ I C '~,~ 131dYtN 0131! Yt0 ICI IJI '// ---i~ N~~•1~ O'3tlN•D ~3At 31.ONAl ~ ~ 1M 1 __ = ~`- 3n• 31.ONA1 I: 1N•AYf it ~ 1'_'T~' e ~ ~ I':. ~~_'^_~^, YI 1NtAy %•1100 i~li ~~•L = ~~ ~~' •1:. i 'L ~_~_~ ~II %•1100 1N0/n0 '- ° 1 ...~~ •~ ~L-'~~~1 ;~11I 1N0/n0 NOS113w3 ~ ^,-~ :~:~• ;=; ;::: "- ' Nos113w3 OIIt YlO Ili r"-_________ -~ ^.~' :`..:: a. ~`~,, -'~ Lgw3W lOlOYwnM Iry ~-~1 -~! v ••^^^»- - ___~_ ~ __4 _-~ 1010iwnN ONIAYI IIIC ~__1_~r~- r_.II I V:~C:':, -- ~I~L~` ~~Jl~,~'~l-'~~ t~ ~ iI ~„ ,!~I v ~ \r~ 9NIAYI S3w•1' 1i~~~i ~ _ ~ -t' .~""'~• •j~~ ~ II !~~ 53wtr ~ I '~ i l_::~~C~~~~ C~L_~ li lI li I i~ 7) M19YOw ~~~--;~ ~( q(I'~II ~^ ~~~ M•OYOw NOl%13M ~`~"-'~O"-" l '~I '~-~• I~ ~ !~~I h NO1i113M ~~ L 113AnG l~' ~U~~~~ P~J ~~h ; ~ ~ it =~I '~I Y3n110 ant NM3/ 1fU~ ~_ ~~~_I II ~i_~.-_.~ ~~ ~l_~'_~:.~.:1 _ r~ _~ 'ant NN3/ N33n0 " li ~~~~~~ '= .--. ~^.~ 6" ~I I' ~ nl N33n0 ~ P r' ~~ n3ssny ~ ^I~1, 'U~~- - 113ssn~1 Nt01Y3M: ~ j '-•~-~J`-'-~`-' ~--~ ~~ Mt OIY3Nf S•wONI' -_ Q ~~ JUG„~J=: - ^~~ Lr-J~ =~1 S•wONl I l NO1/n I ~ Jam. _`-.__.. ._ __J__^_~~~ NO1/n II ------i 1 C~~ __ _~ -" Ir-~ 1N 3JNIA r.... `r '1~^ ,,^~..I.~ ~~ r- _ _. ~/\} -. '- -; 1~~ 1N 30NI11 NYflYNStM ~-_~ ~_l_~ ---... .. `~/ 1- _- _ , rVw~ I NIIntMS•~w ant S9%r3% '+L...-~....-. .. .a,. ..V Lam. ~-=r. -. _ _ ~., ...- _ ~__~_ _~ .~ 7n• S3%t3% ~ • N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N p c ~ r v ,NO r ~ ,°o ~ ~°. ° « ,. ,. . ~ r :°. N O a u -1~ 311N3At/ ti3A110 ~ 3NIl iS3M , m ~ ~ ~ i ' -- //~ / ~ 1 I Z Oa ~ J a W Z ~-~ ~~ w w ~oo~ ZOt ymitvi _ ~~ r ~ 0 N ~ ~ o ~, z N ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Q ' "' J W ~ J Z~ Z Q ~° Wa o a. ~ ~ - , ~~ T ~ ~ a. N of 5z t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ \ ~i 3NIl lOl _ _ - - - - ~ i f~ I Cr} H1f10S 3fiN3Atl NN3d «Z 0 N tl r W J Q U .. ~ -- --~` \\ ' i' i t ~ ~ `1 i ~ ~~ I ... ~ I; i 7201 PENN AVENUE SOUTH C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS MR MULTIPLE DWELLING .. ' '~' MR-1 TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE •: ooo~o MR-2 3-16 FAMILY RESIDENCE u O U R SMIGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE - ZONING ST. ~/~ 7201 PENN AVENUE SOUTH LAND USE ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ID:::t ~ . ~~~~ ~~~ „-,,-~,;,-, m m ~ ~-S COMMERCIAL APARTMENT DUPLEX SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE OUASI PUBLIC Push SCHOOL '''r :x{F PARK ~~ to LLJ Q 7201 PENN AVENUE SOUTH ~ ~ COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ,..... ~~ ID i _~_ ~.. i o 0 ~ ; ' 0 `.~~r PARK i OPEN SPACE c °~°°° 0 0 ~ o00o MEDIUM DENSITY BUFFER 000 00 ° ~f'-' MULTIPLE RESIDENCE 0 0 0 •.f{{• 00 0 o Q SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE o°o° WSTITUTIONAL sir Div CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council .Letter No. 155 Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: Public hearing on a rrquout serviceoinlthenexisting structurelatw a restaurant with ca y 7627 Lyndale Avenue South. Background: Hope's Chow Mein has regtaaurant atn7627~Lyndale Avenue South. continue to operate a re This location has been the site of a number of .food operations since the early fifties. The earlier businesses storeCasubmarine type shops such as a bakery, delicatessen, dairy shop and a Golden Chicken. These were permitted uses under the Zoning Ordinance in effect at that time. Over the years many changes and improvements have been made to this :site and restaurant seating area added without city review. In addition to carry-out, the operation now1~nclThereaarenthreeremployees and requires a conditional use perm twenty-si.x seats . The site is located in a C-2, General Commercial zoning district. A restaurant of this type is permitted in a C-2 General Commercial zoning district with a conditional use permit. Recommended Motion: Approve the conditional use permit request with the following stipulations: 1. A parking plan approved by staff be implemented with an allocation of at least nine parking spaces for Hope's Chow Mein customers. 2. If an entry vestibule is constructed, it must have a 7'-0" minimum between doors. Basis of Recommendation: 1. At the April 24, 1990 regular meeting of the Planningroval of Commission, the Commission voted 8-0 to recommend app this conditiohaveueithermalready beensmetuortaresaddressed stipulations in the recommendation. 2. As a strip shopping center, common parking area is provided. Since the Planning Commission meeting, a parking signage program has been implemented from the restauraNnonrestaurant Some businesses have signs in front which say parking" and other signs direct patrons to an available area to the north. This appears successful in that those businesses that were adversely impacted during the lunch period have been able to keep spaces available for their own customers directly in front of their businesses as an apparent direct result of the sigicant ishnotfownedsbypor business to the south of the .app ~ ~~- part of the above strip center. The business does not have signs in place and is still impacted. 3. This particular business has been in existence since at least the early 1980's. Issuance of this conditional use permit will not intensify the use of this site. 4. The alterations and remodeling is also subject to the building, health and environmental requirements. Alternative Recommendation: The City Council may deny the conditional use permit if a finding of fact determines that the conditional use permit would have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on June 11, 1990. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South. Notice of hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the property. Respectfully submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP:cak i~- ~- H- O W Z 'W _> a W Z N Z 0 a V O J N ~ N N N N N ~ a c ~ a c l c e ~ to v ~ a u L--+°r--.°r- r-~ ~ I--• NSION.15 ~J- ~~~~ n Ie 22 1. J~ __Jl.~l /~12 l_ JL _-Jl l Yt02 [r --~` Jr ~~"I e Y161 Lf J~~~ JJI ~ M0,131ON0, 1~ '1~~________~~~. '3nv ar03o ~T= I ~~S7K~~---- ~----~ Yl yl ~~~~~~~- Y111 ~ ~OOOOOC~ Ot~~OC~ NOlONIwY00,B ~I^~~~~C~~ Y1 fl ~~-~~~~ Y1•1 ~~0~ Yt fl ~~`-' YI zl ~~1_~__ ~~0 Y111 ~oo~ I .J .~J V101 II 101,13 I Mv01N0. I u ~ II O Y snawn,oo l ~ J ' xavd I ~-1 oNV,XVO I r'Ul f 1 '3nv ONS,laod ric i ~~; m YI • I NOlN1,0 ~~ ~~ u ~ of ~ I; ; oYz ~I SN3n31S ~ "~~~ ._._._ Itl ~, ~~ ,I '3nv 13„OOIN „3oslv,8 11 ~I~~~~I Nla0M1N3M L I I ~; '.~l AtlnBS„Id IIT~ UI~^~ ~~ • 1NtlSV3,d Iq~!_.Z. i-°'~z't= - - _ _'1= i~.~-1r~--.~r. oNVao Ii~LUL._Jl^ J ! JUd~ I i it III I ~ i '3nv 3,vONA~ ~ ~I ~~//r%~~\~ d I 1NVAtlB I~11 ~ w ~ ,^ Xtd10~ I ~1 = ~ U/~t 01~' I ~ lwoena II ~ ~ °o NOSa3w3 ~I \\~\ ~r~ ; 1NOw3tld \~-- -----~'-__ 1 ---'----- -- ~-t~~.~.-~ ; . aarrlo t ~~~ , la,oewnN Ij U~~r~~ \~~ ~' cNlnal ~,~~~O~DOOL~ s3wvr ~10~~~~~ xoNx ~ __ ~~O~E•' ,'1~C N.,o, r^-0000 0~ Nsoaow u~~~~ ~0~ NOl M3N ~~OO ~~~~~ a3nno ~J~ `ui~u~lL~~C_ 3nv NN3d N33n0 !I l®~~~_ I~ ~~ ,13SSna j h 'a~~~~_ 1 Nrola3NS ~~ ~ ~L~-_-1~~ -~~~ fV WONl . ~LJ:O.~JOB `_J~~~ _ _ C "- ~I~,71--~~ fir= NanBNSVM '- '~. r ~ '3nv s3xa3x ~~!`••r--.,~-...•:_. .~-{~- .,~~~~~~~ r F. ~2 N N N N N N N N 2 ' O = = oe u ~ u ~ u °u n N N O u •r. C ~ >i ..1 ~ - la. ~_ Z > ~ U vUz FF ~ W N N N N N N N N n ~ ~i+ ~ w ct 2 1. ~ r i. w w w a '- ~ MO„3lONO, __ ________________ 1S ~G______,1~--1.~ 3nv tlv03~ ~~. ~J~ 4J ~: II ~ Y1 L1 _~~,_-~ ~~I ,I ,' NOlONIw00,8 O ~.I Yl fl ~~^II ' vt rl 1~~ ~^--~ l_1 i_J ~ ~/II~~ Y 1 21 i~Jf I'~_'i ~I ~~ Ili it Y! II ~~~I ll1 Vl OI ~~~..i~ Ij ;I lOi~~3 ICI V,;, I ,, ow~INo ini ~~;;~ snewn,o~ !UI 'I• 1--~I j,;i xavd ~~-JJ ' oNV,%vo ' j. ~. J ~'~'~ •3nv ONV'11aOd S •3/1b' 3l~daNA~ ~~r,'1` Y,f S1litL1 ar 'u Ylr I ~I. III NOl NI,O r•• ,,-~`~-1 vet / '-mil U SN3n315 '3nv 131,001N ~~ 1,30SIr,8 II Ills MllOM1N3M `: ~-; ~I~ AanBSl,ld ~ •• •• •:.F.:••: ~ 1NOStl3,d '~I_. ~._• ` w1b:' .• .L'.~ ~ ._._. i~t L •. .. IUI onvao " ~ :•:~. ~ 131aasN ^-~~I I fll 0137dav0 V ~ r~~'~~•• ~~ 3n7 3,tONA, '_, ~C' ~I^O~~ L' li Nolaoir ~~..,~ `~ ~ 1N.AMB voo ,~ r,, 1I 1NOdna U~~~I ~y' Nosa3w3 n ~~~r :I 1NOw3ai a- five-, -- - __~_ ___ _-_ la,oewnN 1 U' '~J oNlnal (^`~(~-~''k J ~ ~ 1 s3wvr 1~~~~~ I n xONx 1~~~C I ~~ 1 Nv90, 10~~C ~ I~O~ NOlM3N l~~~i C0~ ~I tl3nnc 1~~~L~CI~O °I' 'ant NN3d ~~ "•1° I N33n0 '~~ , ~ ~' „3SSntl 1 ^_~ f ,. ~~ NtOItl3N5 l -li~.~C~1OO~ f.woNl ~--- ~'' ~•'~JII 1N30NM ~•-:...-:. ~ _•~+_:__ ~=_:-= _-~-~ '3nv S3%a3z - O N N N N N N N N N N NA S - 0 0 - _ e N u 1. w n 1. w w ~ .^-.:,•.::.:.^_ _ -= _=_- _- _. _ _ - _ - _ _.ww ob.~wo --__ - . -_ EIi55 'NW ~ Q'nldN~~~ L". T .....-..~-.-. ... - - _ - Yan.n • rr.c - - '4'7NV' TWitl."1 Li?[ - _~~ - - _- _ ,r.,+u si,+w ...er = _ - N19y/ noMJ ~i,~Td~N oww ..~~ ~b--3 O Q W "'~ ~a Z W W F- Q ~ W ~ J W a ~' 00 za ~. o ~ o~ ~,, a N t0 ~ r~ ~ ~ j I OO ~ O ~ ~a ~- i~ J r x \ ~~ ~o ~- J,.~s~uc .. ~x. OM!~. ~~~~_ t ~ ~' $ ~a~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ s ~~ _ S ~., Z O Q Z ~"' OW ~~ W (~ Z Z ~ W ~ aQ w °`~ Z Q W Z ,~ o N = W a -O ~a~lli rt-~n-~ E dcr~ ~sar+isna Z W O ~ = Z ~~ N a i~.w O Z~ _ ~ o N N W ~ Q ~ i ~ ~ ~ crr~Yr n~oy~ s~H a ~ a~l~~~dvi ~ H~lntt ~ Q -~ Q ~ ~. ~ A 7I~`v~i Older ~ ! S~o-I I dl j + ~~ w ~ C r ~ ~ gvin{tL viol S~v011~1 cynvrY/off 3nrH7dv/ hNim'~,_ ~~~~~ _ sN~rl~d~-h-tlY/v~o~. O ~ Z .~ ~~~ { ~__ ~~: 7 .~ i s J .r; w `~ IF> ~i 7 .. ~ m~ 7~ W-' Q O< °1 r ~# ~~* ~°~ ~- cJp Ol ~~ ~. ~~ ~ ;~:;~ ~~ O ,;~ : ~~~ ~~~~~ `. ~~ ~ u.) ~ U~ ! 4 ~~-> Q ~ ~ ~, ~~ z ~ v ~.._. w °~ J H~ ~ ~ ~ w? ~, ~ - ~ - - `4 ~ , ''1 0 z iD-~- i~ J A ~_ 1- - ~_ ~" ,~ ,~ ._ ~ - 1~~1s „~ ~~ 7527 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH ZONING ~~~ C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS ® C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL ® C-3 HIGH DENSITY COMMERCIAL ®I INDUSTRIAL R RESIDENCE .--- -- I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ MR MULTIPLE DWELLING MR-1 2 FAMILY RESIDENCES a MR-2 3-16 UNIT RESIDENCES ® MR-3 17 OR MORE UNIT ,; - ,. W. 74TH ST. ------ ~ ~ ~ t W. 76TH ST. H ~~ f~ `-----~-- -_ _- v i ~ L L l L l L`L`L`L`L`L`L`L`L`L`L L LLL `L LL LLLI LULL. L L l L`L`L L L l L l L l L L L l L L L l l l L l l l l l l L L L ~ --~- l l l L L l L l L l l L l L L L L L l L L L L L L L l l L L L l l L L L L L l l l l l L L l l L l L L L L L ~~~- L l L l L l L L L l l t l L L l l L L l L L L L L L L ~ l L L L l L l L l L L l L L L l L L l l L l L L L l L N W a W J Q D 2 J I o-5 RESIDENCE 7627 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH LAND USE COMMERCIAL ®APARTMENT DUPLEX ® QUASI-PUBLIC __ ~_ i ~ ~ r i ~ i ~ ~ ~ PUBLIC VACANT RESIDENTIAL . PARK _ _; ,: ,. 74TH ST. 76TH ST. T W a W J Q D 2 J ST. i~-~ -~ N 7627 LYNnALE AVENUE SOUTH ~~~~ COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN: FREEWAY STRIP '~~~'~' =~~~: . MEDIUM DENSITY/BUFFER ® MIXED LAND USE "~' ® MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL 1 .~_ I I ~~ I I 1 1 I I 1 I I ~ 1 ~~~ I I 1 1 i 1 ~ ' t i :.: 1 1 1 1 I IJ:.'::.'. I 1~•. i.• W. 74TH ST. W. 75Th ST. H W Q W J Q 2 J INSTITUTIONAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKS & OPEN SPACE -~ N ~i~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 156. Agenda June 11, 1990 Issue Statement: The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has voted not to extend the contract for the Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center (Detox) beyond May 31,.1990. Background: The Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center provides sub-acute detoxification, assessment and referral services. The Center was established in 1980 and has served mare than 17,000 patients. It is located in Eden .Prairie. Hennepin County has paid for 65$ of the Center's patients (those from Hennepin County unable to pay); with the remaining 35$ coming from insurance, Scott and Carver counties and self-pay. Hennepin County Commissioners voted to cut the annual budget for suburban detoxification from $940,000 to 5640,000. Hennepin County funds for suburban detoxification will go only to Union City Mission Care in Plymouth. Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center in Eden Prairie will receive no Hennepin County Funding, putting the program in jeopardy of closing. This would reduce suburban detoxification services in Hennepin County by 46$ (from 41 beds to 22 beds).. In 1989, Richfield Public Safety Department admitted 144 patients. to Fairview Receiving. Of the 1,013 total admissions for the Fairview Receiving Center during 1989, 123 patients were Richfield residents. Recommended Motion: It is our recommendation that the Council pass a resolution asking the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to continue the funding for detoxification services with Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center in Eden Prairie, but that this funding be done so that available funds for all Hennepin County detox centers are distributed on a pro-rata basis. Basis of Recommendation: Intoxicated people who cannot be admitted to a detoxification center present a threat and danger to the safety of the community. The Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center provides a valuable service to the community of Richfield. Alternative Recommendation: Do not pass a resolution. Discussion/Decision Mode: Staff is requesting approval of the attached resolution at the June 11, 1990 City Council meeting. Respe fully submitted, Jame Prosser City Manager JDP:cak ~l(-I RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNCIL GO ON RECORD ENCOURAGING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO CONTINUE FUNDING FOR FAIRVIEW DETOX WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has voted not to extend the contract for the Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center beyond May 31, 1990, and WHEREAS, one suburban facility does not have adequate capacity to serve the needs of the suburban communities, and WHEREAS, the distance of the Plymouth facility presents time and personnel problems, and WHEREAS, the community relies on Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center to provide safe detoxification for inebriated persons, and WHEREAS, intoxicated people who cannot be admitted to a detoxification center present a threat and danger to the safety and tranquility of the community, and WHEREAS, the role of detox is to provide early intervention and prevention of harm to others, and WHEREAS, the south suburban communities of Hennepin County have the largest population and receive the lowest level. of detoxification services, and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield understands the need for certain Hennepin County budget cuts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Richfield City Council asks the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to continue the funding for detoxification services with the Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center in Eden Prairie, but that this funding be done so that available funds for all Hennepin County detox centers are distributed on a pro-rata basis. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 11th day of June, 1990. Steven J. Quam Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk III-~- FACT SHEET Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center Detoxification Services -- Provides sub-acute detoxification, assessment and referral services; includes 24-hour nursing care -- Established in 1980, served more than 17,000 patients -- Location: in Eden Prairie (Hwy. 169 & Valley View Road) in southwest Hennepin County -- 19-person capacity -- The center cared for 10 percent more patients in 1989 than in 1988 (2,100 in 1988 and 2,300 in 1989) -- Hennepin County pays for 65 percent of center's patients (those from Hennepin County unable to pay); remaining 35 percent comes from insurance, Scott and Carver counties and self-pay -- Average length of stay 2.03 days; shortened from 1988's 2.4 days, due to increased efficiencies, resulting in ability to care for more patients r -- 75 percent of patients are between ages of ~18 - 44 -- 22 percent of patients are women -- Cocaine-using patients increased dramatically; in 1986, 2 percent of patients said they'd used cocaine compared with 9 percent in 1989 Recividism: -- 83% of those admitted do not return -- In the center's 10-year history, 2 percent of the patients have been at the center more than 5 times -- .02% of the patients have been at the center more than 15 times 5/10/90 ~II-3 May 10, 1990 FACTS CIITB IN HENNEPIN COIINTY BUBIIRBAN DETO%IFICATION SERVICES -- Suburban detoxification services in Hennepin County will be cut 46 percent (from 41 beds to 22 beds) effective June 1. -- In mid-April the Hennepin County commissioners voted to cut the annual budget for suburban detoxification from $940,000 to $640,000. -- Hennepin County funds for suburban detoxification will go only to Union City Mission Care in Plymouth. Fairview Receiving and Evaluation Center in Eden Prairie will receive no Hennepin County funding, putting the program in jeopardy of closing. See attached sheet for numbers of people from southwestern Twin Cities suburbs who received care at Fairview Detox. -- In November, 2020 Adolescent Receiving Center (detoxification for adolescents) near downtown Minneapolis closed because of lack of Hennepin County funding. If you include their 14 beds, a total of 60 percent of the detox beds in the county have been cut (from 55 beds to 22 beds). ~~ .~ : ~ ~S ate, - fib, ~~~-~ Admissions by Referring Police Department Fairview Receiving and Evaluation. Center Detoxification Services 1989 Richfield 114 Bloomington 258. Hopkins 116 Minnetonka 145 St. Louis Park 133 Edina 143 Eden Prairie 104 /Z3 ~~Q~~~ /tt.o~i-Tr (Approximately 50$ of the patients cared for at the center are brought in by police.) Fairview ~.~ ~~'' Treatment Programs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ •~ -~,.~ ,,,~,. , ~ ,,.,, h,,.,., ~ Jrrrrcr of hurrwru~ ~,~/~.~, I'r~~rr~e, ,t1.1' ~S.f-ri ~~~~' ~ ~ Ma 3 r Y 1990 ~'A L J Public Safety Director John Erskine vt 6700 Portland Avenue ~~ Y ~~l Richfield, MN 55423 Dear Chief Erskine, ~ ~ We at Fairview Southdale Hospital and Fairview Receiving Center are extremely disappointed with the decision made by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners regarding the Eden Prairie detoxification center. As you are probably well aware of by now', the County Board has voted not to fund the Receiving Center after May 31, 1990. This jeopardizes the very existence of the Center. The Center has been a resource for the southwestern suburbs since 1980. In these ten .years over 17,000 intoxicated persons have been admitted providing safety to the community as well as the individuals themselves. In 1989 alone there were 2,300 admissions. As we have talked with many southwest suburban community leaders over the past several weeks we have been both gratified and concerned. We have been gratified by the support and appreciation we have received. We have been and continue to be very concerned about whaf will happen in our communities if the detox closes. Fairview Southdale Hospital has not decided to close the Receiving Center. Published reports to that effect are erroneous. Because of the important community need the Center fulfills we are exploring every available option to continue the service for the communities of southwest Hennepin County. To that end we would like to invite you to a meeting to be held on Thursday, Mav 10 1990 at 9.00 A M The meeting will be held at Fairview Southdale Outpatient Chemical Dependency Program site: at 3101 West 69th Street, Edina. The site is located in the Community Credit Building across from Key Cadillac near the east side of Southdale Shopping Center. The meeting will last one hour. The agenda will include the following: * Overview of Present Situation * Political Options * Funding Options * Action Plan We hope you or a representative will be able to attend the meeting.- The last thing we all want is to turn back the clock ten years in the provision of services for intoxicated persons in our community. Respectfully., Dad ~als~~ ~hD.r~Director ~``~ `s`~"~"" ` -~~,•~ Sharon Lee Foster, Director Behavioral Services Fairview Receiving Center