The URL can be used to link to this page

09-12-2017 Complete AgendaS P E C IAL C IT Y C O U N C IL W O R K SESSIO N R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C EN TER, B AR T H O L O ME W R O O M S E P T E MB E R 12, 2017 5:15 P M C all to order 1.Organi cs collection and organized garbage hauling. 2.69th S treet P ilot P roject Interim D esign A djournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager September 7, 2017 Council Memorandum No. 83 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: Organics Collection and Organized Garbage Hauling Council Members: A Council work session is scheduled at 5:15 p.m. on September 12, 2017, to present a report from Bloomington staff regarding their first year of organized garbage hauling, followed by a presentation about organics collection. Attending will be Jennifer Nguyen Moore, Project Coordinator for the City of Bloomington; Ben Knutson, Hennepin County Environment and Energy Department; and, a number of Richfield residents that have expressed interest in introducing organics collection to the community. Please contact me if you have questions or concerns. Respectfully submitted, Steven L. Devich City Manager SLD:jt Email: Assistant City Manager Department Directors CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager September 7, 2017 Council Memorandum No. 84 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Subject: 69th Street Pilot Project Interim Design Council Members: At the September 12, 2017, Council work session, staff will need direction on how to proceed with the interim design for the 69th Street pilot area. Please review the following two options: 1. Slight modification to the current design: (Transportation Commission recommendation) - (4.5’ shoulder on south edge – 11’ lanes – 9.5’ path) It would remain a multi-use path with the delineators separating traffic from path users and could be maintained for both snow plowing and street sweeping. 2. Symmetrical striped roadway with “buffered shoulders”: (5’ shoulder on both edges – 2’ buffer stripe on both edges – 11’ lanes) – This option would look like 70th Street on the east side of town but WITHOUT designating the shoulder as a bike or pedestrian space. No delineators are included in this option. The Transportation Commission reviewed the two options and strongly prefers option 1 primarily due to the effectiveness of the delineators in slowing traffic and providing a protected space for the pedestrians. Please contact Kristin Asher, Public Works Director, at 612-861-9795 to discuss. Respectfully submitted, Steven L. Devich City Manager SLD:kda Email: Assistant City Manager Department Directors R EG U LAR C IT Y C O U N C IL ME E TIN G R IC H F IE L D MU N IC IPAL C EN TER, C O U N C IL C H AMB E R S S E P T E MB E R 12, 2017 7:00 P M IN TR O D U C TO RY P R O C E E D IN G S C all to order Open forum (15 mi nutes maximum) E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who w ish to address the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting. P ledge of A llegiance A pproval of the mi nutes of the: (1) S pecial Joint C i ty C ouncil and Richfield S chool B oard of E ducation (IS D No. 280) work session of A ugust 8, 2017; and (2) Regular C ity C ouncil meeting of A ugust 8, 2017. P R E S E N TATIO N S 1.S wearing-in of C ity of Richfield P olice Officers Mark Mendoza, Nicholas S chi pp, Robert F redericks, and D ylan S chultz 2.Richfield Independent S chool D istrict No. 280's 2017 Referendum 3.Open S treets at P enn F est on S unday, S eptember 17 from noon to 4 p.m. 4.P roclamation declaring S eptember 16, 2017, as The A merican L egion D ay i n the C ity of Richfield C O U N C IL D IS C U S S IO N 5.Hats Off to Hometown Hits AG E N D A AP P R O VAL 6.A pproval of the A genda 7.Consent C alendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City C ouncil in one motion. Once the C onsent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However, any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the regular agenda for C ouncil discussion and action. All items listed on the C onsent C alendar are recommended for approval. A .C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on updating the C ity’s D eferred S pecial A ssessment P olicy. S taff Report No. 121 B .C onsi deration of the approval of the purchase of a front-end loader from Ziegler Inc. for $248,200.00, less $26,500.00 trade-in allowance, totali ng $221,700.00, for use by the P ublic Works D epartment. S taff Report No. 122 C .C onsi deration of the approval of resolutions pertaining to the annual Lyndale/HUB /Nicollet (L H N) mai ntenance assessment process and scheduling a public hearing for October 10, 2017. S taff Report No. 123 D .C onsi deration of the approval of resolutions pertaining to the annual 77th S treet maintenance district assessment process and scheduling a public hearing for October 10, 2017. S taff Report No. 124 E .C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on declaring costs to be assessed for removal of diseased trees from private property for work ordered i n 2016 and scheduling a public heari ng for October 10, 2017. S taff Report No. 125 F.C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on pertaining to the proposed 2017 A lley P aving project assessment process and scheduling a public hearing for October 10, 2017. S taff Report No. 126 G.C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on authorizing submission to the Transportation E conomic D evelopment (TE D ) P rogram for the 77th S treet Underpass project. S taff Report No. 127 H.C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on re-approving site plans for a community band shell at Veterans Memorial P ark. S taff Report No. 128 I.C onsi deration of the approval of a fi rst reading of an ordinance to change the zoning of a number of properti es between 66th and 68th S treets and 17th and C edar Avenues from Mixed Use - C ommunity (M U-C ) and Multi-F amily Residential (MR-2) with the C edar Avenue C orri dor Overlay (C A C ) to P lanned Multi-F amily Residential (P M R). S taff Report No. 129 J.C onsi deration of the approval of a fi rst reading of an ordinance that would make small wireless facilities a condi ti onal use in residential districts. S taff Report No. 130 K .C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on supporting a grant applicati on to Hennepin C ounty for the C edar P oint S outh/C hamberlain project. S taff Report No. 131 L .C onsi deration of the approval of a request for the temporary expansi on of the licensed premises for D avanni 's, located at 6345 P enn Avenue S outh, to allow for the outsi de service of strong beer on S unday, S eptember 17, 2017, in conjuncti on with Richfield's Open S treets at P enn F est event. S taff Report No. 132 M.C onsi deration of the approval of a request for the temporary expansi on of the licensed premises for Thompson's F ireside P izza, Inc., d/b/a F i reside F oundry, located at 6736 P enn Avenue S outh, to allow for the outsi de service of wine and strong beer in their parking lot on S unday, S eptember 17, 2017, in conjuncti on with Richfield's Open S treets at P enn F est event. S taff Report No. 133 N.C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on appointing Health A dministrator A nderson as the B oard of Health's (C ity C ouncil) agent on matters relating to the Minnesota D epartment of Health as it relates to Ri chfi eld's L ocal P ublic Health grant. S taff Report No. 134 O.C onsi deration of the approval of the continuation of the agreement wi th the C ity of B loomington for the provi si on of food inspection services for Richfield for the year 2018. S taff Report No. 135 P.C onsi deration of the approval of an agreement allowing Richfield D epartment of P ublic S afety to accept grant monies from the U.S . D epartment of J ustice, Office of Justice P rograms, the E dward B yrne Memori al J ustice A ssistance Grant (J A G) P rogram. S taff Report No. 136 Q.C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on authorizing acceptance of Offi ce of Traffic S afety (O TS ) funds for a four-year grant to fully fund an officer and fully equipped squad car dedicated for D W I enforcement i n Ri chfi eld. S taff Report No. 137 R.C onsi deration of the approval of a resoluti on authorizing a new four-year contract to provide two J uvenile Investi gator/S chool L iaison Officer servi ces for S chool D istrict #280 at the Richfield High S chool and the Ri chfi eld Middle S chool. S taff Report No. 138 S .C onsi deration of the revocation of the HUB D airy Queen food establishment license due to non-payment of state taxes. S taff Report No. 139 T.C onsi deration of the reappointment of J ack Wold as a youth member of the Transportation C ommission for a term of S eptember 1, 2017 to A ugust 31, 2018. S taff Report No. 140 U.C onsi deration of the appointment of D erek S andbeck to the A rts C ommi ssi on with a term expiring J anuary 31, 2020. S taff Report No. 141 8.C onsideration of items, if any, removed from C onsent C alendar PR O P O S E D O R D IN AN C ES 9.C onsideration of the second reading of an ordi nance amending C ity C ode S ection 802 related to small cell wireless i nstallation in the C ity right-of-way and approval of a resolution authori zing summary publication. S taff Report No. 142 R E S O L U T IO N S 10.C onsideration of the approval of the 2017 Revised/2018 P roposed B udget resolutions adopting the 2018 preliminary property tax levy, setting truth in taxati on hearing date, authorizing budget revisions, and authorizing revision of 2017 budget of various departments. S taff Report No. 143 O T H E R B U SIN E S S 11.C onsideration of the approval of a data shari ng agreement for analysis of use of force incident reports from the Richfield P oli ce D epartment. S taff Report No. 144 C IT Y MAN AG E R ’S R E P O R T 12.C ity Manager's Report C L AIMS AN D PAYR O LL S 13.C laims and P ayrolls Open forum (15 mi nutes maximum) E ach speaker is to keep their comment period to three minutes to allow sufficient time for others. C omments are to be an opportunity to address the C ouncil on items not on the agenda. I ndividuals who w ish to address the C ouncil must have registered prior to the meeting. 14.A djournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. R equests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the C ity Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Special Joint City Council and School Board of Education (ISD No. 280) Work Session August 8, 2017 CALL TO ORDER The work session was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 6:02 p.m. in the Municipal Center. Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Michael Howard; Maria Regan Gonzalez; Present: and Simon Trautmann School Board Christine Maleck; Crystal Brakke; Tim Pollis; John Ashmead; Peter Toensing; Members Present: and Paula Cole (arrived at 6:27 p.m.) City Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/HR Manager; John Stark, Community Development Director; and, Jared Voto, Executive Aide/Analyst. School Staff Steven Unowsky, Superintendent; and Beth Picard, Assistant to the Present: Superintendent. Item #1 DISCUSS ITEMS OF MUTAL INTEREST Members of the City Council and School Board introduced themselves. Mayor Elliott welcomed the School Board and staff and asked if they had a topic to start the meeting. Superintendent Unowsky asked about updates on development and housing in Richfield. Community Development Director Stark presented an update on current and upcoming development in the city, as well as projects that are in the “concept” level. City Manager Devich discussed the TIF district by Cedar and thanked the School Board for passing resolutions approving its extension. Superintendent Unowsky spoke regarding affordable housing and its impacts on the students of the district. Community Development Director Stark discussed “Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing” (NOAH), strategies the City currently has in place, as well as a few options the City is currently researching as possible options. Council Members commented on the affordable housing as a larger discussion about housing in the city and that they believe the Council and School Board’s values are aligned. Mayor Elliott asked about the School’s referendum. Superintendent Unowsky share information on the referendum, which contains funding for both operations and long-term financial stability and capital projects. City Council and School Board members discussed the referendum and its need for Richfield students. Special Council Work Session Minutes -2- August 8, 2017 Mayor Elliott asked about additional meetings with the School Board. City Council and School Board members agreed to meeting quarterly. Council Member Garcia discussed building community and handouts she distributed with Public Safety and Community Development initiatives. Council Member Regan Gonzalez discussed having a School Board member be a liaison to the City Council, similar to how she is a liaison from the City Council to the School Board. ADJOURNMENT The work session was adjourned by unanimous consent at 6:58 p.m. Date Approved: September 12, 2017 _____________________________ Pat Elliott Mayor _____________________________ ____________________________ Jared Voto Steven L. Devich Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Elliott at 7:03 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Council Members Pat Elliott, Mayor; Edwina Garcia; Michael Howard; Maria Regan Gonzalez; Present: and Simon Trautmann. Staff Present: Steven L. Devich, City Manager; Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; Pam Dmytrenko, Assistant City Manager/HR Manager; Jay Henthorne, Public Safety Director/Police Chief; Kristin Asher, Public Works Director; Chris Regis, Finance Manager; Jeff Pearson, City Engineer; Jack Broz, Transportation Engineer; and Jared Voto, Executive Aide/Analyst. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Elliott led the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/Garcia, S/Howard to approve the minutes of the: (1) Special Joint City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority Work Session of July 17, 2017; (2) Special City Council Work Session of July 25, 2017; and (3) Regular City Council Meeting of July 25, 2017. Motion carried 5-0. Item #1 RICHFIELD IN BLOOM AWARD Sue Rosenberg spoke regarding the Richfield in Bloom Award and Richfield Garden Tour. The “People’s Choice” Award was awarded to Mary Shannon of the ajoining gardens at 7036 and 7044 Logan Avenue. The 'Joe K' Award was also given this year, in honor of longtime resident and gardener Joe Krzyzaniak, who passed away this past year. Mary Shannon also won this award and received an additional prize. OPEN FORUM CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Richfield, Minnesota Regular Meeting August 8, 2017 Council Meeting Minutes -2- August 8, 2017 Kevin Watts, 6900 Russel Ave S, spoke regarding the 69th Street pilot project and requested it be redesigned. Ken Meter, 7415 Humboldt Ave S, spoke regarding the flyover at 76th St and 35W. Kim Danneker, 4404 15th Ave S, Minneapolis, spoke regarding a Richfield resident’s interaction with Richfield police. Iola Kostrzewski, 13000 Garden Lane, Eden Prairie, spoke regarding an interaction with Richfield police. Corydon Nilsson, St. Paul, spoke regarding a Richfield resident’s interaction with Richfield police. John Thompson, St. Paul, spoke regarding police accountability and a Richfield resident’s interaction with Richfield police. Item #2 COUNCIL DISCUSSION  Hats Off to Hometown Hits Council Member Regan Gonzalez thanked the community members for being present and working toward solutions Council Member Howard spoke regarding continuing to work together as a community; the pedestrian safety event held at 70th & Nicollet; and thanked the Human Rights Commission youth members for their service. Council Member Trautmann spoke regarding Wood Lake Nature Center’s programming for kids; beginning a dialog in the community; and thanked Richfield law enforcement officers. Council Member Garcia thanked Council Member Regan Gonzalez for facilitating discussions and continuing the dialog and congratulated Anne Schultz for becoming the President of the Richfield Chamber of Commerce. Mayor Elliott thanked the other Council members for their honesty and support, and presenting the values of Richfield and the dialog that was started. Item #3 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Council Member Howard requested to remove item 4.B. and 4.E. from the Consent Calendar. M/Howard, S/Trautmann to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. Item #4 CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Devich presented the Consent Calendar. Council Meeting Minutes -3- August 8, 2017 A. Consideration of the first reading of an ordinance amending City Code Subsection 802 related to small cell wireless installation in the City right-of-way and schedule a second reading for September 12, 2017. (S.R. No. 110) C. Consideration of the approval of an agreement with Safe Water Commission to assist with administering the updated cross connection program. (S.R. No. 112) D. Consideration of the approval of a resolution granting a site plan amendment to allow additional parking space at 6941 Nicollet Avenue. (S.R. No. 113) F. Consideration of the approval of a resolution granting a site plan amendment and variance to allow a building addition and reconfigured parking lot for a K-8 school at 1401 76th Street West. (S.R. No. 115) G. Consideration of the approval of a two-year use and indemnification agreement between the City of Richfield and Tom Price for the use of a 4,690 square-foot strip of land along the edge of Lincoln Field. (S.R. No. 116) H. Consideration of the approval of a resolution to execute Addendum A - Sponsoring Agency Agreement between and Minnesota Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue Team and the City of Richfield. (S.R. No. 117) I. Consideration of the approval of a resolution granting a conditional use permit and variance to allow a restaurant at 6436 Penn Avenue. This item was continued from the July 11, 2017, City Council meeting. (S.R. No. 118) M/Elliott, S/Howard to approve the consent calendar. Motion carried 5-0. Item #5 CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR B. Consideration of: 1. Approval of design engineering contract with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for the Lyndale Avenue Street Reconstruction between 66th St. and 76th Street. 2. Approval of a resolution for reimbursement of certain expenditures from the proceeds of street reconstruction bonds to be issued by the City of the Lyndale Avenue Street Reconstruction. (S.R. No. 111) Council Member Howard presented Staff Report No. 111. Public Works Director Asher and City Engineer Pearson presented on the Lyndale Avenue street reconstruction project and discussed the public outreach component of the project. M/Howard, S/Elliott to approve a contract with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for design engineering of the Lyndale Avenue Street Reconstruction Project between 66th and 76th Streets, not to exceed $824,827 and approve a resolution for reimbursement of certain expenditures from the proceeds of street reconstruction bonds to be issued by the City of the Lyndale Avenue Street Reconstruction. Motion carried 5-0. E. Consideration of the approval of a resolution granting a subdivision waiver, allowing the division of 7445 Humboldt Avenue into two lots. (S.R. No. 114) Council Member Howard presented Staff Report No. 114. Council Meeting Minutes -4- August 8, 2017 Public Works Director Asher and City Engineer Pearson discussed the potential flyover and its impacts on the property. M/Howard, S/Regan Gonzalez to approve a resolution granting a subdivision waiver for 7445 Humboldt Avenue. Motion carried 5-0. Item #6 PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION PROVIDING HOST APPROVAL FOR THE ISSUANCE OF TAX-EXEMPT REVENUE BONDS BY THE CITY OF DEEPHAVEN FOR THE BENEFIT OF SEVEN HILLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY. (S.R. NO. 119) Council Member Michael Howard presented Staff Report No. 119. Carl Schlueter, Executive Director of Seven Hills, spoke regarding the project. Council members asked for clarification on the purpose of this item. Finance Manager Regis responded it is required by the State tax code. M/Elliott, S/Howard to close the public hearing. Motion carried 5-0. M/Howard, S/Elliott to approve a resolution authorizing the City of Deephaven to issue tax- exempt revenue bonds on behalf of Seven Hill Preparatory Academy.. Motion carried 5-0. Item #7 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS TO THE 69TH STREET PILOT PROJECT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION. (S.R. NO. 120) Council Member Trautmann presented Staff Report No. 120. Council members commented on the use of pilot projects and getting resident feedback. They also asked about the timing of implementing the project. Public Works Director Asher responded they hope to complete the work this fall. Council members discussed the options that were talked about at the previous work session, as opposed to the Transportation Commission’s recommendation. Council members thanked staff, the Transportation Commission, and residents involvement in the pilot project. M/Trautmann, S/Elliott to approve implementation the 69th Street Project Interim Improvements with the recommendation and on-going communication with the Transportation Commission. Motion carried 5-0. Council Meeting Minutes -5- August 8, 2017 Item #8 CITY MANAGER’S REPORT Assistant City Manager/HR Manager Dmytrenko gave an update on the airport-related issues and the Noise Oversight Committee. Item #9 CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS M/Garcia, S/Elliott that the following claims and payrolls be approved: U.S. Bank 08/08/17 A/P Checks: 260896 - 261296 $ 3,749,090.25 Payroll: 129377 - 129755 685,377.44 TOTAL $ 4,434,467.69 Motion carried 5-0. OPEN FORUM None. Item #10 ADJOURNMENT The City Council Meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 8:27 p.m. Date Approved: September 12, 2017 Pat Elliott Mayor Jared Voto Steven L. Devich Executive Aide/Analyst City Manager AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.A. STAFF REPORT NO. 121 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regi s, F inance Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution updating the City’s Deferr ed S pecial Assessment Policy. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: At the J une 28, 2016, C ity Council meeting, the Council approved an update of the proc edures and qualify ing criteria for deferring special assessments against owner occ upied properties in hardship cases. Specifically, the update was to bring the policy in line with State Statutes to allow Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who are ordered into ac tive military service eligible for assessment deferral. However, the polic y had already been updated to inc lude members of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves. This oc curred in J une of 2009. C onsequently, the 2016 resolution and polic y as written, references an inc orrect resolution number and some of the language needs to be amended. Therefore, staff is recommending C ounc il approve the attached polic y and resolution that references the correc t resolution number and amends the language. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution updating pr ocedures for deferment of special assessments against owner occupied homestead properties in har dship cases for qualifying homeowners. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The policy was last updated in 2016. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The c urrent polic y requires some minor updates in order to make it ac curate. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Deferring assessments may be the only means for some residents on fixed incomes to pay these high costs. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney has recommended updating the policy to the correct resolution number and language. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type D eferred S pecial A ssessment P olicy Resoluti on Resolution L etter D eferred S pecial A ssessment P olicy E xhi bit A E xhibit RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION UPDATING PROCEDURES FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST OWNER-OCCUPIED HOMESTEAD PROPERTIES IN HARDSHIP CASES FOR QUALIFYING OWNERS WHEREAS, under Minnesota law, cities are authorized to defer the payment of special assessments for any homestead property: (1) owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability for whom it would be a hardship to make the assessment payments; or (2) owned by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined by Minnesota Statute 190.05, subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 435.193 requires that any City desiring to defer special assessments in such instances much establish, by ordinance or resolution, standards and guidelines for determining the existence of a hardship and for determining the existence of a disability. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City of Richfield hereby adopts a policy, as set forth in the attached Exhibit A to this resolution, to consider requests for the deferment of special assessments upon homestead properties: a. owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability for whom it would be a hardship to make the assessment payments; or b. owned by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined by Minnesota Statute 190.05, subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. 2. The policy previously adopted by Resolution No. 11216 is hereby rescinded and superseded by the policy as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Exhibit A POLICY FOR DEFERMENT OF ASSESSMENTS BASED ON HARDSHIP AND AGE OR DISABILITY The City of Richfield hereby establishes a program to defer all or a portion of the special assessments of qualifying persons under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 435.193 through 435.195. Under the program, the City Council and the City Manager may defer the payment of all or a portion of certified special assessments by property owners who are at least 65 years of age or older or who are retired due to permanent and total disability or who are a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service and whose households meet certain financial characteristics. A. Eligibility A person is eligible for a deferment if the person satisfies requirements related to property classification, owner status, and financial hardship. 1. The property upon which the assessment is deferred must be classified as homestead in the records of the Hennepin County Property Tax Division. 2. The property must be owned by a person: a. Who is at least 65 years of age on January 1st of the year in which payment of the first installment of the subject assessment levy is due; or b. Who is retired due to permanent and total disability. For purposes of this policy, “permanent and total disability” means a condition that is permanent by nature and that totally incapacitates the person from working at an occupation that would generate income to the person. c. Who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in section 190.05, subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person’s military orders. 3. The applicant must have a "financial hardship" defined as: a. An annual income for the applicant’s household size which is at or below the “Very Low Income” limit established annually by HUD for the Minneapolis and St. Paul Metropolitan Area; and b. The aggregate total of special assessment installments from previously-existing special assessment levies plus the first year of the current levy will exceed 1.5 percent of the applicant's annual income. B. Calculation of Amount to be Deferred 1. The portion of the current levy eligible for deferment is that portion of the levy against the applicant's property which requires a first year installment payment which, when added to the applicant's annual payments from previously existing special assessment levies, would result in an aggregate total of special assessment installments totaling more than 1.5 percent of the applicant's annual household income. The portion of the current levy which can be paid without aggregating total installments above 1.5 percent of the applicants annual household income may not be deferred. 2. Special assessments levied due to the applicant's failure-to-pay charges for City services or failure to comply to City codes (e.g., delinquent utility assessments, assessments for weed removals, assessments for nuisance abatement, etc.) will not be deferred, and installment payments for existing levies for such services will not be included in calculating the maximum 1.5 percent aggregate payment defined in paragraph B.1. above. C. Interest. Simple interest at the rate of that particular assessment levy will be added to the deferred assessment, calculated from the date interest started to accrue on the original levy (usually the October 1 immediately following the certification date) to the date of payment of the deferred portion of the assessment. D. Termination. The option to defer the payment of special assessments will terminate and all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, shall become due upon the occurrence of any of the following events: 1. The death of the owner provided that the spouse is otherwise not eligible for the benefits. 2. The sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or any part thereof. 3. If the property should for any reason lose its homestead status. 4. The City Council determines that a hardship no longer exists. E. Application and Approval Process. 1. Application for deferral of payment of special assessments must be made on forms prescribed by the Hennepin County Auditor. The applicant must also provide such supplementary documentation as may be required to establish the following: a. The legal description and tax parcel number of the property. b. The street address of the property. c. The status of the homestead classification for the property. d. The description or designation of the local improvement for which assessments are to be or have been levied. e. The name of the homestead owner-occupant. f. The age or disability status of the applicant. g. The applicant’s annual household income. h. The applicant’s military orders. 2. Within 30 days after the application is filed with the City manager, the City Manager should review the application for conformance to the standards and guidelines prescribed above and either grant or deny the application. The City Manager must notify the applicant in writing of the City Manager’s decision. If in the judgment of the City Manager exceptional or unusual circumstances exist that are not covered by the standards and guidelines, the City Manager may report to the City Council within 30 days after the application is made, along with a recommendation as to whether the application should be granted or denied. 3. If the City Manager denies an application, the applicant has the right to have the City Council consider the application. The applicant must request City Council review within 20 days after the mailing date of the City Manager’s notice of decision. 4. When the City Council considers an application, the Council will grant or deny the application by resolution, based on the standards and guidelines set forth above. The City Council also may grant a deferment if it determines that a hardship exists on the basis of exceptional and unusual circumstances not covered by the standards and guidelines set forth above, provided that the determination is made in a nondiscriminatory manner and does not give the applicant an unreasonable preference or advantage over other applicants. The City Council’s decision to grant or deny an application is final. 5. At any time while a special assessment remains deferred and unpaid, the City Manager may request the applicant to provide current and updated information as set forth at paragraph E.1. above, so that the City Manager may verify and determine whether eligibility for the deferral has ended. This policy is adopted by Resolution No. ___________, approved by the Richfield City Council on September 12, 2017. AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.B. STAFF REPORT NO. 122 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris L i nk, Operations S uperintendent D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 8/24/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of the purchase of a front-end loader from Ziegler Inc. for $248,200.00, less $26,500.00 trade-in allowance, totaling $221,700.00, for use by the P ublic W orks D epartment. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Public W orks Department utilizes three loaders to provide various servic es to the public . One of the main services is to plow and remove snow. The front-end loader proposed for replaced was originally sc heduled for replacement in 2013 and cannot provide these servic es due to repairs needed to the transmission, engine, and hy draulic sy stem. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the purchase of a front-end loader from Ziegler Inc. for $248,200.00, less $26,500.00 trade-in allowance, totaling $221,700.00. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Replacement schedules are set for eac h vehic le and piec e of equipment purchased. The following are taken into consideration when dec iding on when to replace vehic les/equipment: Year of purchase (1993) Replacement date/depreciation (2013) History of repairs Tec hnology upgrades Fuel efficienc y B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The C ity of Ric hfield participates in the Minnesota State Cooperative P urc hasing Program. This program will be used for this purchase. W hen the purc hase of materials, merc handise, equipment, or construc tion exc eeds $100,000, authority to purchase shall be submitted to the C ity Council for consideration. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Approval at this meeting will ensure delivery of the vehic le in the y ear it is budgeted for purchase (2018). D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The 2017 Revised/2018 Proposed Budget inc ludes $220,000 for this purchase. This purchase is $1,700 over the budgeted amount and the 2018 Revised/2019 Proposed Budget will inc lude the ac tual purchase pric e. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney will be available to answer questions. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Quote B ackup Materi al P icture of L oader B ackup Materi al AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.C. STAFF REPORT NO. 123 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris L i nk, Operations S uperintendent D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C hristopher Regis, F inance Manager C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of resolutions per taining to the annual Lyndale/H U B /N icollet (L H N) maintenance assessment process and scheduling a public hearing for O ctober 10, 2017. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Lyndale/HUB /Nic ollet (L HN) maintenance district was established to rec over special maintenanc e expenses in the L HN area in 1981. The special services include: Maintenanc e and operation of irrigation Mowing Fertilization W eed control Trash and litter removal Maintenanc e of street lighting system T he L H N Redevelopment Area is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue. Staff is recommending the City Council: Approve resolution declaring the 2016 assessment costs and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment for 2016. Schedule public hearing for October 10, 2017 for proposed assessments. Approve resolution proposing a similar assessment process for 2018. Schedule public hearing for October 10, 2017 for future assessment process. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: 1. Adopt a resolution declaring costs to be assessed and ordering prepar ation of the proposed assessment roll for 2016 Lyndale/H U B/Nicollet (L H N) maintenance and schedule a public hearing for O ctober 10, 2017. 2. Adopt a resolution proposing a similar assessment process to be implemented for 2018 and schedule a public hearing for October 10, 2017. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT City staff has determined ac tual costs of c urrent services to be assessed for the 2016 maintenanc e of this area to be $26,025.24, and the estimated cost for 2017 maintenanc e to be $50,000. Fluc tuations in expenditures for maintenanc e of L HN are c aused by a number of factors: W eather determines water usage and irrigation costs Conc rete repairs vary from year to year Repairs are never foreseeable Update aging infrastructure B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Sec tion 825 of the C ity Code indicates “current servic es” mean one or more of the following: (a) snow, ice, or rubbish removal from sidewalks; (b) weed elimination from streets or private property; (c) removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding any struc ture included under the provisions of Minnesota S tatutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26; (d) installation or repair of water service lines; (e) street sprinkling, sweeping, or other dust treatment of streets; (f) the trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees from any street; (g) the treatment and removal of insect-infested or diseased trees on private property; (h) the repair of sidewalks and alley s; (i) the operation of a street lighting system; (j) the maintenance of landsc aped areas, decorative parks and other public amenities on or adjacent to street right-of-way; and, (k) snow removal and other maintenance of streets in commerc ial redevelopment areas. Council ordered the work and the work was done for 2016. It is anticipated the Council would like to order similar work for 2018. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Eac h year, the C ity shall list the total unpaid c harges for current services against each separate lot or parc el to whic h they are attributable under section 825 of the C ity Code. This list is available at the offices of the City C lerk, Assessing, and Public W orks. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: All c osts to the C ity will be recovered through this assessment. Estimated and actual c osts for the L HN maintenanc e services from 2003-2016 are: Year Estimated Actual 2003 $50,000 $37,785.67 2004 $50,000 $44,031.39 2005 $50,000 $45,385.31 2006 $50,000 $45,648.56 2007 $50,000 $51,605.29 2008 $50,000 $49,999.99 2009 $50,000 $49,747.02 2010 $50,000 $32,459.40 2011 $50,000 $39,090.87 2012 $50,000 $32,244.51 2013 $50,000 $25,522.16 2014 $50,000 $29,415.52 2015 $50,000 $27,321.07 2016 $50,000 $26,025.24 E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : No legal issues are apparent at this time. T he City Attorney will be in attendance at the Council meeting should a legal question arise. Section 825, Subd. 2 states that “the City Clerk, under the Council’s direction, shall publish notice that the Council will meet to consider the undertaking of current services and levying of special assessments to pay costs thereof.” The public hearing notic e is scheduled to be published on September 21, 2017. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Counc il may make any c hanges to the assessment roll as deemed necessary after the public hearing. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: I mpacted property owners AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution (2016)Resolution L etter Resolution (2018)Resolution L etter A ssessment Role B ackup Materi al Map of Mai ntenance D istrict B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET (LHN) MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016 WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the maintenance of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area which is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for such maintenance amount to $26,025.24 for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $26,025.24 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such maintenance against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. 4. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 2017, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said maintenance assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the maintenance. The City Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. _______________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COSTS OF CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET (LHN) PROJECT AREA FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2018 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2018 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. There is hereby established a special assessment district, the boundaries of which are conterminous with the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Project Area, for the purposes of assessing for current services provided by the City. 2. The following current services of the City are hereby proposed to be undertaken by the City in the district, with the costs of such services to be specially assessed against benefited property within the district: • Snow, ice or rubbish removal; • Weed elimination; • Elimination or removal of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding any structure included under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 463.15 to 463.26; • Installation or repair of water service lines; • Street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets; • Trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees; • Repair of sidewalks, crosswalks, and other pedestrian walkways; • Operation of the street lighting system; • Maintenance of landscaped areas and other public amenities on or adjacent to street right-of-way; • Maintenance of Civic Plaza; • Snow removal and other maintenance of streets; • Painting and repair of wood furniture; • General maintenance, including repairs and replacement. 3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such current services consists of every assessable lot and parcel of land within the district. It is proposed that special assessments on commercial property be made on the basis of the area with each square foot of assessable commercial property within the district being assessed an equal amount for maintenance of common area. Exempt from the special assessment levy shall be all single family, two-family, multiple family residential property within the LHN redevelopment district. Special maintenance of individual commercial properties shall be assessed directly for costs incurred in performing said maintenance to said property. 4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give public notice of a hearing by this Council at which the Council will consider the undertaking of such current services and the levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. The City Clerk shall also give mailed and published notice of such hearing as required by law. Such hearing shall be held on Tuesday, October 10, 2017, commencing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda. 5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the costs of the aforementioned services for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The estimated cost of providing all the aforementioned current services during that period is $50,000. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th of September, 2017. ____________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk 2017 LHN Assessment PID Address Column1 Assessment 2702824130115 16 66TH ST E $32.54 2702824230115 42 ADDRESS PENDING $178.95 2802824110090 42 ADDRESS PENDING $622.26 2802824110089 42 ADDRESS PENDING $984.23 2802824140371 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $77.27 2802824140370 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $256.23 2702824320133 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $239.96 2702824320132 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $89.48 2702824320134 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED $174.88 2702824240064 100 66TH ST W $1,342.14 2702824240061 199 65TH ST W $5,356.34 2702824240063 220 66TH ST W $239.96 2702824230082 300 66TH ST W $1,146.92 2702824320138 407 66TH ST W $170.82 2702824230106 700 66TH ST W $20.34 2702824230107 704 66TH ST W $1,695.96 2802824140010 800 66TH ST W $483.98 2802824410039 826 66TH ST W $268.43 2702824130052 6401 NICOLLET AVE S $126.08 2702824240040 6410 NICOLLET AVE S $97.61 2702824240065 6412 NICOLLET AVE S $252.16 2702824230114 6420 LYNDALE AVE S $797.15 2702824130053 6425 NICOLLET AVE S $276.56 2702824230084 6436 LYNDALE AVE S $77.27 2702824230085 6438 LYNDALE AVE S $56.94 2702824230074 6439 LYNDALE AVE S $471.78 2702824240057 6440 NICOLLET AVE S $138.28 2702824230086 6440 LYNDALE AVE S $113.88 2702824230087 6444 LYNDALE AVE S $203.35 2702824230088 6444 LYNDALE AVE S $215.56 2702824130001 6445 NICOLLET AVE S $374.17 2702824230010 6467 LYNDALE AVE S $284.70 2702824240060 6500 NICOLLET AVE S $728.01 2702824230090 6500 LYNDALE AVE S $256.23 2702824230111 6501 LYNDALE AVE S $1,309.60 2702824230105 6501 WOODLAKE DR $81.34 2702824130116 6501 NICOLLET AVE S $1,317.73 2702824230112 6525 LYNDALE AVE S $618.20 2702824230113 6545 LYNDALE AVE S $496.18 2702824420078 6601 NICOLLET AVE S $683.27 2702824320137 6601 LYNDALE AVE S $1,395.01 2702824320452 6640 LYNDALE AVE S $1,663.44 2702824320127 6645 LYNDALE AVE S $471.78 2702824320126 6701 LYNDALE AVE S $138.27 26,025.24$ WEST PLEASANT AVE SWoodl ake Dr Lake Shore Dr 63RD ST W RAE DR EMERSON AVE SLYNDALE AVE SALDRICH AVE SBRYANT AVE SCOLFAX AVE SDUPONT AVE SBOB PL 67TH ST W E M E R S O N L A N E Wood LakeLn 66TH ST W 6 5 TH S T WHARRIET AVE SGARFIELD AVE64TH ST W 65TH ST W NICOLLET AVE SGARFIELDAVES6 6 TH S T WLYNDALEAVESGRAND AVE SEAST PLEASANT AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE SBLAISDELL AVE SNICOLLET AVE S1ST AVE SLYNWOOD BLVDM ILDRED DR (CO RD NO 52)Ri chfield Lake ACADEMY OFHOLY ANGELS BLESSED TRINITYCATHOLICSCHOOL WOOD LAKENATURE CENTER THE HUB LITTLEBOB'SPARK NICOLLETPARKGARFIELDPARK APPLEBLOSSOMPARK 6348 6242 8 10 12 652765256521 65096507650565036501 7 1 0 7 0 4 7 1 6 6321 6463646764596716 670410121016101810081014905 6812 6738 6732 6726 6720 6714 6708 6700 6644 6638 6632 6626 6620 6614 6608 6636 6632 6628 6624 6620 6616 6612 6608 1107-09 67356725 6733 6729 6715 6709 6705 6707 6701 6645 6639 6633 6621 6625 6609 6601 6800 905912926 911 901 6615 6615 826 6604 6721 6657 6633 6629 6625 6621 6617 6615 6611 6607 6605 927925923 917 6701 6525 9019036500 920 924 1106 920 910 900 825 800 91592110016445 6540 6536 6327 6532 6528 6524 6520 6516 6512 6508 65046500 6533 6529 6539 1124 6525 6436 643064266424 6420 6416 6412 6408 6404 6400 6531 6535 4 812 6444 6300 6304 6315 102010166420 63016305 100810006304 6300 6301 6305 9201050 9149109069006320 6308 6300 63016305 141663096311 6321 63256327 6308 63046300 63016305 6313 6300 6239 6245 6244 6238 6244 6238 6239 1820226245 6244 6238 6232 6239 6245 6234 6233 6232 906 6328 6324 6320 6314 6317 6321 6325 6330 6320 6641 66246629 6625 66386635 6633 6632 10-12 6644 6641 6633 6627 6601 6621 6617 6613 6605 6601 6721 6727 6733 6739 6738 6732 6726 6729 6733 6737 6701 6705 6711 6715 6718 6714 6708 6704 6700 6701 6705 6709 6713 6719 6547 65496551 407 6601 6711 6600 400 6338633663346332 6555 6645 6701 6717 6600 6734 6732670067016705 6709 6713 6717 6721 6725 6729 6733 6737 6738 6724 6720 67126708 67006701 6709 6713 6717 6721 6725 6729 6733 6737 6741 6744 6736 6732 6728 6724 6720 6716 6712 6708 67046700 67406743672567306709 6725 6733 6737 6741 6745 6740 6736 6732 6724 6720 6716 6710 6700 6640 67306729 6737 6738 6732 6726 6725 6729 161/26735 6739 6738 6734 6728 6724 6737 6741 6740 6736 6600 100 220 199 66th St W 6500 6440 3236 6401 6409 6415 6421 6429 64146420 6410 64006401 6409 6415 6421 6429 6428 6420 6414 6408 64006401 6409 6415 6421 6429 6428 6420 6414 6408 6400 6401 6413 6421 6429 6428 6420 6414 6408 6400 6437 212 200 6430 7 1 8 7 2 26501 6401 6500 6444644064386436 300 6501 65216439800 840 6430 5215156400 6408 6229 6231 1/2 80 6414 6420 4154094016401 6409 6415 6421 6420 6414 6408 6400 6401 6411 6417 6423 6431 6439 6438 6426 6420 6414 6408 301 400 312 300 6345 6086106006025205225145085004184204104124004023163183083006233 6237 6236 6226 6229 6237 6236 6228 6229 6237 6236 6228 6229 6237 6236 6228 6301 6305 6311 6317 6323 6329 6335 6334 6328 6322 6316 6310 6304 63006301 6305 6311 6317 6323 6329 6335 6334 6328 6322 6316 6310 6304 6300 6334 6328 6322 6316 6310 6304 6300 6244 6240 62416245 6244 6240 6241 6245 300 6 6240 6301 6301 6245 6241 6244 62406245 6337 6345 6342 6338 6332 6331 6337 6345 6344 6336 6332 6331 26283057 6337 6343 6342 6336 6330 6331 6337 6343 63426344 63366338 63306332 6301 6305 6309 6319 6325 6324 6318 6312 6306 6301 6305 6309 6319 6325 6324 6312 6308 6304 63006301 6305 6313 6319 6325 6324 6312 6308 6304 63006301 6313 6321 6329 6324 6318 6312 6306 6300 6234 6235 6244 6235 6234 6235 6234 6228 6237 6224 62206227 34 336225 6229 6228 6224 6220 6225 6227 6231 6228 6224 6220 6225 6229 6228 6224 3638 204 6625 164 1006533 6527 6521 6515 6509 6501 65356533 6519 6515 6400 6408 6414 6420 6426 6425 6401 6445 6439 6433 6427 6421 6415 6409 6401 6444 64326445 6345 6339 6333 6327 63216320 6326 6332 6338 63446343 6337 6331 6325 6319 6300 4462 66 64 76 96 94 201 140 6315 6325 6335 644164436402 6445644764516457646164654086545 6312 6300 6308 6333 6339 6354 4064046511 6517 820 7 2 07 2 4 780 790 924928 1025 1112 1115 11186515 11256505 1120 110010301020 1005110510351015 1020 62366238 1&2 62446246 6307 6221 Nicollet Ave S 6308 921 6710 L.S. DR 6715L.S. DR Lyndale-Hub-Nicollet (LHN)Assessment DistrictRichfield, Minnesota The City of Richfield makes no representation or warranties, expressor implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided herewith,regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is noguarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency,suitability, or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user acceptsthe data “as is”, and assumes all risks associated with its use. Assessment Districts 2017 Assessed Parcels #I:\GIS\Public Works\Streets\AssessmentDistricts\Data\2017\2017LHNAssessment.mxd1 inch = 500 Feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet B l o o m i n g t o nEdinaMinne a p o l i s M S PGVWX35GVWX31 GVWX53 GVWX32 GVWX53 GVWX53 GVWX53 GVWX32 GVWX52 GVWX52 GVWX35 GVWX35 §¨¦35W §¨¦35W §¨¦494 §¨¦35W §¨¦494 ?A@62 ?A@77 ?A@62 ?A@62 ?A@77 AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.D. STAFF REPORT NO. 124 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris L i nk, Operations S uperintendent D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C hristopher Regis, F inance Manager C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of resolutions per taining to the annual 77th S treet maintenance district assessment pr ocess and scheduling a public hearing for October 10, 2017. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Sinc e 1988, the City has been performing special maintenanc e along the 77th S treet redevelopment area between I -35W and C edar Avenue. The spec ial maintenance servic es include: Maintenanc e and operation of irrigation systems Mowing Fertilization W eed control Trash and litter removal These services are provided on both sides of the 77th Street wall. The maintenanc e func tions, known as current services, are funded through a maintenance assessment on the 77th S treet businesses. Staff is recommending the City Counc il: Approve resolution declaring the 2016 assessment c osts and order the preparation of the proposed assessment for 2016. Schedule public hearing for Oc tober 10, 2017 for proposed assessments. Approve resolution proposing a similar assessment process for 2018. Schedule public hearing for Oc tober 10, 2017 for similar assessment process. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: 1. Adopt a resolution proposing to assess commercial properties in the 77th Street assessment district for costs incurred to maintain the area in 2016 and schedule a public hearing for October 10, 2017. 2. Adopt a resolution proposing a similar assessment process to be implemented for 2018 and schedule a public hearing for October 10, 2017. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT City staff has determined ac tual costs of c urrent services to be assessed for the 2016 maintenanc e of this area to be $71,489.33, and estimate the cost for 2018 maintenance to be $80,000. Fluc tuations in expenditures for maintenanc e of the 77th Street assessment distric t are caused by a number of fac tors: W eather determines water usage and irrigation costs Concrete repairs vary from year to year Updating aging infrastructure Maintenance and replacement of landsc aping B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Sec tion 825 of the C ity Code indicates “current servic es” mean one or more of the following: (a) snow, ice, or rubbish removal from sidewalks; (b) weed elimination from streets or private property; (c) removal or elimination of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding any struc ture included under the provisions of Minnesota S tatutes, sections 463.15 to 463.26; (d) installation or repair of water service lines; (e) street sprinkling, sweeping, or other dust treatment of streets; (f) the trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees from any street; (g) the treatment and removal of insect-infested or diseased trees on private property; (h) the repair of sidewalks and alley s; (i) the operation of a street lighting system; (j) the maintenance of landsc aped areas, decorative parks and other public amenities on or adjacent to street right-of-way; and, (k) snow removal and other maintenance of streets in commerc ial redevelopment areas. Council ordered the work and the work was done in 2016. Resolution No. 7405, adopted in 1988, established a polic y for assessing the costs. Commerc ial property owners will be assessed on a per-square-foot basis. Single family and multi-family residential properties, plus the two churc hes in the area, would be exempt from the spec ial assessment levy. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Each year, the City shall list the total unpaid charges for current services against each separate lot or parcel to which they are attributable under section 825 of the City Code. This list is available at the offices of the City C lerk, Assessing, and Public W orks. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: All c osts to the C ity will be recovered through this assessment. Estimated and actual c osts for the 77th Street maintenanc e servic es from 2003 - 2016 are: Year Estimate Ac tual 2003 $80,000 $59,831.07 2004 $80,000 $63,842.79 2005 $80,000 $64,841.54 2006 $80,000 $69,606.52 2007 $80,000 $77,441.46 2008 $80,000 $77,000.01 2009 $80,000 $62,894.55 2010 $80,000 $64,124.81 2011 $80,000 $72,427.48 2012 $80,000 $78,286.46 2013 $80,000 $59,779.82 2014 $80,000 $71,499.01 2015 $80,000 $59,557.56 2016 $80,000 $71,489.33 E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : No legal issues are apparent at this time. The C ity Attorney will be in attendance at the Council meeting should a legal question arise. Sec tion 825, Subd. 2 states that “the C ity Clerk, under the Council’s direc tion, shall publish notice that the Council will meet to consider the undertaking of current services and levying of special assessments to pay costs thereof.” The public hearing notic e is scheduled to be published on September 21, 2017. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Counc il may make any c hanges to the assessment roll as deemed necessary after the public hearing. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution (2016)Resolution L etter Resolution (2018)Resolution L etter A ssessment Role B ackup Materi al Map of Mai ntenance D istrict B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 77TH STREET MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016 WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the maintenance of the 77th Street Redevelopment Area the boundaries of which are approximately east of I -35W and west of Cedar Avenue in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for such maintenance amount to $71,489.33 for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $71,489.33. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such maintenance against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The City Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. 4. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 2017, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said maintenance assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the maintenance. The City Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minne sota this 12th day of September, 2017. ________________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROPOSING TO SPECIALLY ASSESS FOR THE COSTS OF CURRENT SERVICES PROVIDED WITHIN THE 77TH STREET PROJECT AREA FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2018 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2018 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. There is hereby established a special assessment district, the boundaries of which are east of I-35W and west of Cedar Avenue, for the purposes of assessing for current services provided by the City. 2. The following current services of the City are hereby proposed to be undertaken by the City in the District with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against benefited property within the District;  The trimming and care of trees and shrubs and the removal of any unsound trees from any street;  The repair of sidewalks;  The maintenance of landscaped areas and other public amenities on or adjacent to street rights-of-way;  Trash and litter removal. 3. The area proposed to be specially assessed for such current services consists of each and every commercial lot and parcel of land within the District. It is proposed that the special assessments on the commercial property be made on the basis of area. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of a hearing by this Council at which the Council will consider the undertaking of such current services and the levying of special assessments to bear the costs thereof. Such notice shall be published in the official newspaper at least once, at least two weeks prior to the date of hearing. The City Clerk shall also give mailed notice of such hearing as required by law. Such hearing shall be held Tuesday, October 10, 2017, commencing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be reached on the agenda. 5. It is hereby proposed that the project consist of the aforementioned services for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The estimated cost of providing all of the aforementioned services during that period is $80,000. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. ________________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk PID Address STREETNAME Assessment 3302824430050 1 MERIDIAN CROSSINGS 4,062.26$ 3302824430049 2 MERIDIAN CROSSINGS 3,703.35$ 3502824440032 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 32.63$ 3302824440236 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 440.49$ 3302824440114 42 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 16.31$ 3402824340001 84 78TH ST W 269.19$ 3402824340056 100 78TH ST W 432.33$ 3402824340053 200 78TH ST W 1,745.63$ 3402824330087 301 77TH ST W 913.60$ 3402824440037 308 78TH ST E 603.63$ 3402824440032 345 77TH ST E 685.20$ 3402824330088 351 77TH ST W 1,957.72$ 3402824330156 401 77TH ST W 5,603.97$ 3402824440028 415 77TH ST E 195.77$ 3402824440023 500 78TH ST E 546.53$ 3502824330009 616 78TH ST E 473.12$ 3302824440234 700 78TH ST W 318.13$ 3302824440232 710 78TH ST W 6,150.50$ 3302824440235 980 78TH ST W 220.24$ 3302824440231 1000 78TH ST W 7,023.31$ 3502824430008 1200 78TH ST E 872.82$ 3502824430073 1400 78TH ST E 269.19$ 3302824430019 1401 76TH ST W 2,145.33$ 3502824430074 1420 78TH ST E 905.44$ 3502824430076 1500 78TH ST E 1,117.53$ 3502824440010 1550 78TH ST E 2,618.45$ 3502824440031 1600 78TH ST E 628.10$ 3502824440008 1620 78TH ST E 1,011.49$ 3502824440007 1640 78TH ST E 742.30$ 3502824440006 1710 78TH ST E 611.79$ 3302824440110 7610 LYNDALE AVE S 1,737.47$ 3302824440113 7630 LYNDALE AVE S 228.40$ 3502824440004 7636 CEDAR AVE S 1,019.64$ 3302824440115 7644 LYNDALE AVE S 179.46$ 3402824330152 7645 LYNDALE AVE S 473.12$ 3402824330153 7645 LYNDALE AVE S 473.12$ 3402824330154 7645 LYNDALE AVE S 473.12$ 3402824330155 7645 LYNDALE AVE S 473.12$ 3402824330150 7645 LYNDALE AVE S 473.12$ 3402824330151 7645 LYNDALE AVE S 473.12$ 3402824340065 7700 NICOLLET AVE S 350.76$ 3302824440233 7700 LYNDALE AVE S 440.49$ 3402824440006 7700 PORTLAND AVE S 269.19$ 3402824340073 7700 PILLSBURY AVE S 766.77$ 3402824340054 7700 WENTWORTH AVE S 375.23$ 3402824440027 7701 5TH AVE S 252.87$ 3502824330006 7701 PORTLAND AVE S 416.02$ 3402824330082 7701 LYNDALE AVE S 122.36$ 3402824340061 7701 PILLSBURY AVE S 187.61$ 3402824430078 7701 NICOLLET AVE S 7,651.41$ 3402824440024 7708 5TH AVE S 187.61$ 3402824340060 7709 PILLSBURY AVE S 187.61$ 3502824430006 7711 14TH AVE S 774.93$ 3402824440025 7714 5TH AVE S 187.61$ 3402824340058 7715 PILLSBURY AVE S 97.89$ 3402824340059 7717 PILLSBURY AVE S 89.73$ 3402824340055 7720 WENTWORTH AVE S 375.23$ 3402824340066 7720 NICOLLET AVE S 326.29$ 3402824340057 7721 PILLSBURY AVE S 628.10$ 3502824330007 7727 PORTLAND AVE S 554.69$ 3402824440007 7730 PORTLAND AVE S 432.33$ 3402824440029 7731 4TH AVE S 391.54$ 3502824330008 7733 PORTLAND AVE S 513.90$ 3402824430005 7740 2ND AVE S 758.61$ 3502824340002 7744 12TH AVE S 464.95$ 3402824440031 7744 5TH AVE S 571.00$ 3402824330081 7745 LYNDALE AVE S 1,362.24$ 3402824430077 7745 2ND AVE S 432.32$ 71,489.33$ 2017 77th St./ILN Project Area Assessment 211 7614 7608 7727 7701 7709 77177715 7721 100 7720 7700 200 7644 7600 7601 7609 7615 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 7601 7609 7615 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 84 7645 7645 7625 7615 7601 7601 351 301 7701 7745 401 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 7601 7609 7615 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 7639 7638 7633 7632 7627 7626 7621 7620 7615 7614 7609 7608 7601 7600 501 7533 7545 7544 7538 7532 7533 7539 7545 7544 7538 7532 7533 7539 7545 7544 7538 7532 7533 7539 7545 300 7 7538 7532 7531 7537 7545 7544 7538 75307533 7539 7545 7544 7538 75327527 7537 7545 7544 7538 7530 7645 7700 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 7601 7621 7627 7633 7639 7644 7630 7600 7639 7633 7627 7621 7615 76011017 7609 7615 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 1001 7639 7633 7627 700 704 7621 7615 7609 7601 7612 7608 7604 100 200 7601 Girard Ave S 42 AD 42 AD 7625 7632 7626 7620 7614 7608 7600 1401 7621 7617 7609 7601 7529 7529 753375377541 7545 7544 754075367532 7528 7537 7541 7545 7538 7529 7533 7537 7536 7532752875327528 7529 7533 753775417545 7544 753275287529 7533 75377541 7545 7544 75407536 7532 75287529 7533 7541 7545 7544 754075367532 7528 7533 75377541 7545 7544 754075367532 7619 76237625 76297631 76357637 76417643 7610 8090 97 93 89 85 81 77 99 95 91 87 83 79 1000 78th St W 980 710 78th St W M eridianCrossingsEAST PLEASANT AVE SPILLSBURY AVE SWENTWORTH AVE S78TH ST W 76TH ST W 76TH ST 77TH ST WGRAND AVE SHARRIET AVE SGARFIELD AVE S7 8 T H S T W 77TH ST W SHOPS AT LYNDALE US BANCORP Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet (ILN)Assessment DistrictRichfield, Minnesota The City of Richfield makes no representation or warranties, expressor implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided herewith,regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is noguarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency,suitability, or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user acceptsthe data “as is”, and assumes all risks associated with its use. Assessment Districts 2017 Assessed Parcels #I:\GIS\Public Works\Streets\AssessmentDistricts\Data\2017\2017ILNAssessment.mxd1 inch = 500 Feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet 7621 7627 7633 7639 7717 7625 7632 7626 7620 7614 7615 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 76147615 7621 7625 7632 7628 7620 7621 7625 7629 7635 7634 7628 7624 7620 7635 7629 7625 7621 6167733 7727 7701 631 620 710 701 315 345 7744 7715 7731 415 7701 7714 7708 500 7639 7633 7627 7621 7720 7701 7730 7700 7644 4th Ave S 7745 7623 7619 76437645 7627 7633 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7620 7701 7740 7636 7626 7720 7700 7727 30 45 100 7720 7700 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7627 7633 7639 7638 7626 7620 84 7735 308 305 7730 7740 40508090 70 60 97 93 89 85 81 77 4953576165 99 95 91 87 83 79 67 63 59 55 51 47 7627 607 626 632 638 711 717 729 735 716 728 734 77TH ST E 7 8 TH ST E 78TH ST E 4TH AVE S77TH ST W INTERSTATE HWY NO 494 I N T E R S T AT E H W Y N O 4 9 4 PARTNERSHIPACADEMYSCHOOL MENARDS ROOSEVELTPARK 152477th St E 160077th St E 152477th St E 76337629 7621 7615 7614 7620 7615 1550 1600 1620 1640 760017th Ave S 7636 7625 15001420 1400 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 76207621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 1200 1300 7711 7700 - 14 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 7621 7627 7633 7639 7638 7632 7626 7620 901 1001 7700 77449001000 1306 1312 1318 1324 7764 - 787740 - 627716 - 387635 7627 77TH ST E 78TH ST E INTERSTATE HWY NO 494 WASHINGTONPARK B l o o m i n g t o nEdinaMinne a p o l i s M S PGVWX35GVWX31 GVWX53 GVWX32 GVWX53 GVWX53 GVWX53 GVWX32 GVWX52 GVWX52 GVWX35 GVWX35 §¨¦35W §¨¦35W §¨¦494 §¨¦35W §¨¦494 ?A@62 ?A@77 ?A@62 ?A@62 ?A@77 §¨¦35W §¨¦494 §¨¦494 §¨¦494LYNDALE AVENICOLLET AVEPORTLAND AVE12th AVE AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.E. STAFF REPORT NO. 125 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris L i nk, Operations S uperintendent D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C hristopher Regis, F inance Manager C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution declaring costs to be assessed for removal of diseased trees from pr ivate property for work order ed in 2016 and scheduling a public hearing for O ctober 10, 2017. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: T he health of trees within municipal limits is threatened by shade tree diseases and it is the City’s responsibility to control and prevent the spread of these diseases. I f the City deems it nec essary to remove a diseased tree on private property, the property owners have three options available for removal: 1. Remove the tree themselves. 2. Hire and pay a c ontrac tor. 3. Hire a c ontrac tor and request the cost of the tree removal be assessed against their property tax. I n the period from J anuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, 7 property owners chose the third option. The total amount to be assessed is $10,336.69. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Adopt a re solution declaring costs to be asse ssed and ordering the pre paration for the proposed asse ssme nt roll for the re moval of dise ased tre e s from priv ate property for work orde re d in 2016 and set the public he aring date for October 10, 2017. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT I n the early 1970’s, the City of Richfield began a shade tree disease program to assist homeowners in the removal of diseased trees on private property. The following proc ess is how the C ity ensures property owners are aware of their diseased tree(s). Notification to Property Owners At time of marking for removal, paperwork is left at the property which includes: Removal deadline W hy the tree was marked for removal A ssessment information I nformation regarding private c ontrac tors Card informing City of owners removal plans City staff c ontac ts for more information I f the tree becomes hazardous or is past the removal time limit an additional deadline letter is sent to the property owner. T he letter is sent to the last known owner, obtained from Hennepin County Property Records and verified with Richfield utility billing records. Occupied Properties As stated above, property owners of diseased trees have three options available for private tree removal: 1. Remove the tree themselves. 2. Hire and pay a contractor. 3. Hire a contractor and request the cost of the tree removal be assessed against their property tax. Vacant Properties I n cases where the property is vacant and no owner can be found, removals must be ordered when trees have passed the removal time limit or bec ome hazardous. A contractor then performs the removal and the c ost is assessed to the property. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The work has been completed with prior approval from the affected residents; except in cases of vacant properties. Minnesota State Statute requires the County to be notified of all spec ial assessments. A notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment will be mailed at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the diseased tree removal to the owner. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The unpaid c harges for the removal of the diseased trees must be spec ial assessed for certific ation to the C ounty Director of P roperty Taxation and Collec tion along with current taxes as stated in City C ode 825.05 Subd. 3. Unpaid assessments must be reported to Hennepin County by November 30th of eac h year. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The c osts to be assessed for the removal of diseased trees on private property for work ordered during the period J anuary 1, 2016, through D ec ember 31, 2016, have been determined to be $10,336.69. The property owner may pay the original principal amount without interest within 30 days from the date the C ounc il adopts the assessment. The unpaid balance will be spread over one year with a five percent interest rate. The original sourc e of funding to have the work done is through the City ’s Permanent I mprovement Revolving Fund. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : T he City Attorney will be in attendance at the Council meeting should a legal question arise. The public hearing notic e is to be published on September 21, 2017. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Council may revise the special assessment roll as deemed necessary following the public hearing. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: I mpacted property owners AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2016. WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the removal of diseased trees from private properties in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred or to be incurred for such work ordered during the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 amount to $10,336.69. Address Address PID Amount 320 Apple Lane 27-028-24-14-0062 $910.56 6616 Morgan Ave 28-028-24-32-0021 $1,605.00 7324 17th Ave 35-028-24-14-0093 $922.85 7325 Humboldt 33-028-24-13-0042 $2,145.50 7339 Blaisdell 34-028-24-24-0114 $1,823.68 7445 Clinton 34-028-24-41-0060 $2,500.00 6520 15th Ave 26-028-24-13-0080 $429.10 TOTAL $10,336.69 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The total cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $10,336.69. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such work against each benefited property, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. 4. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 2017 in the Richfield Municipal Center - Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as hereafter it may be reached on the agenda, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said diseased tree removal assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the diseased tree removal. The City Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 12th day of September, 2017. ______________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.F. STAFF REPORT NO. 126 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J eff P earson, C ity E ngineer D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: C hristopher Regis, F inance Manager C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution pertaining to the proposed 2017 Alley Paving project assessment pr ocess and scheduling a public hearing for October 10, 2017. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Paving of the three partial alley s identified for improvements in 2017 has been c ompleted. C ity polic y is to assess the adjac ent property owners for the c ost of the alley paving. At the April 11, 2017 City Counc il meeting, Council approved a c ontrac t with Ron K assa C onstruc tion, I nc. for the 2017 Alley Paving project. The total actual cost of the projec t is $39,246.31. This amount, which is less than the engineer's estimate, will be used for the ac tual assessments. Project Histor y On October 11, 2016, the City C ounc il ordered the preparation of a preliminary report for the 2017 Alley Paving project. A resolution receiving the preliminary report, whic h identified four partial alley s that had yet to be paved, was approved on D ec ember 13, 2016. At the same time, the City Council set a public hearing on the project for J anuary 24, 2017. A public meeting for affected residents was held on Wednesday, January 11, 2017. At the January 24, 2017 City Council meeting, all comments received were provided to council members as part of the public hearing. Based on public input, it was decided to pave three of the four alleys under consideration. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Adopt a re solution declaring the costs to be assesse d of the propose d assessment roll for the 2017 Alle y Pav ing proje ct and sche dule a public hearing for Octobe r 10, 2017. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT I n 1981, the C ity Council established a polic y providing for the improvement of the C ity’s alleys by c oncrete paving upon the receipt of petitions. On A pril 28, 1986, the City Council held a special study session to review alternative alley paving polic ies. I t was the consensus of the Council to support the alternative that recommended paving all remaining alley s without submission of petitions. I n 2016, staff identified four (4) partial alley s in Ric hfield that had yet to be paved. Staff rec ommended the Council move forward to have the remaining alley s paved. City policy is to assess the adjacent property owners for the cost of the alley paving. A public meeting for affec ted residents was held on W ednesday, J anuary 11, 2017 from 4:30 – 6:30 p.m. at the W ood Lake Nature Center. Notices of the informational meeting and notices of the public hearing were mailed out separately to impacted residents. A public comment form was also mailed to impac ted properties to allow those not able to attend the public hearing an opportunity to provide input. Any c omment forms rec eived by staff before the J anuary 24, 2017 City C ounc il meeting were provided to c ounc il members as part of the public hearing. Based on public input, it was decided to pave three of the four alleys under c onsideration. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): City policy is to assess the adjacent property owner for the cost of the alley paving. Established prac tice is to use conc rete for all alley paving projects. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The assessment rolls are due to Hennepin County no later than November 30, 2017. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The c ost of the improvements was $39,246.31 100% of the project cost will be assessed to adjacent property owners over a 7-year period at a 3% interest rate. All costs to the City will be recovered through this assessment. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney will be available to answer questions. Staff is following Minnesota Statute 429 (local improvements) process for the assessment. A public hearing notice was published on January 12, 2017 and January 19, 2017 regarding the project and coinciding assessments. T he remaining public hearing notice will be published September 21, 2017. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Council may make any c hanges to the assessment roll as deemed necessary after the public hearing. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: I mpacted property owners AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2017 ALLEY PAVING PROJECT WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the 2017 alley paving project from private properties in the City of Richfield and the expenses incurred in the amount of $39,246.31. Address NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. The total cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $39,246.31. 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such work against each benefited property, and shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the City Council thereof. PID Address Street Footage Cost per foot 40.87$ Lump Sum 2702824310007 6744 Blasidell 47.38 1,936.57$ 276.65$ Plus Interest 2702824310006 6740 Blasidell 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 2702824310005 6736 Blasidell 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 2702824310030 6745 Wentworth 47.38 1,936.57$ 276.65$ Plus Interest 2702824310009 6741 Wentworth 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 2702824310010 6737 Wentworth 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 2602824140110 1524 66th St E 51.2 2,092.70$ 298.96$ Plus Interest 2602824140109 1528 66th St E 43.2 1,765.72$ 252.25$ Plus Interest 2602824140108 1532 66th St E 43.2 1,765.72$ 252.25$ Plus Interest 2602824140111 6533 Bloomington 133.6 5,460.64$ 780.09$ Plus Interest 3402824140027 7345 5th Ave 47.12 1,925.94$ 275.13$ Plus Interest 3402824140028 7341 5th Ave 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 3402824140029 7337 5th Ave 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 3402824140030 7333 5th Ave 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 3402824140026 7344 Portland Ave 47.12 1,925.94$ 275.13$ Plus Interest 3402824140025 7340 Portland Ave 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 3402824140024 7336 Portland Ave 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest 3402824140023 7332 Portland Ave 50 2,043.65$ 291.95$ Plus Interest TOTAL 960.2 39,246.31$ 2017 Alley Paving Assessment 7 Year Assessment 4. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 2017 in the Richfield Municipal Center - Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as hereafter it may be reached on the agenda, to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said alley paving project assessment will be given an opportunity to be heard in reference to such assessment. 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment at least two weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the alley paving project. The City Clerk shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 12th day of September, 2017. ______________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.G. STAFF REPORT NO. 127 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J eff P earson, C ity E ngineer D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution authoriz ing submission to the Transportation Economic Development (TE D) Program for the 77th Str eet U nderpass project. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is currently acc epting applications as part of the Transportation Economic Development (TE D ) Program. The 77th Street Underpass project qualifies for submittal due to roadway interac tion with Trunk Highway 77 and its expec ted economic development impact along the I -494 corridor. W ith Council approval, staff is preparing to submit an application for the requested amount of $4,500,000 to be c ontributed to the project. I f suc cessful, funding would be available in 2019 or 2020. Applic ations are due September 15, 2017. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution authorizing the C ity to apply for the Transportation and Economic Development Pr ogram and accept funds if chosen. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The Minnesota D epartment of Transportation’s Transportation Economic D evelopment Program (TE D) provides competitive grants to c onstruc tion projec ts on state highway s that provide measurable economic benefits. The economic benefits may be loc al, regional or statewide in geographic sc ale. The TE D program was authorized by the Minnesota State Legislature in state statue 174.12. The Minnesota D epartment of Transportation, in partnership with the Minnesota D epartment of Employment and Ec onomic Development, administers the program. D E E D administers a parallel Transportation Ec onomic Development I nfrastructure (TE D I ) program that funds projec ts on local roads and for other ty pes of transportation. Projec ts may c ombine funding from both programs, provided the funds are used for eligible expenses. MnD OT funding may only be used for trunk highway purposes while D E E D funding cannot be used on trunk highway s. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The proposed project meets multiple goals in the City 's Comprehensive P lan (Transportation). C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The deadline for applications is September 15, 2017. Construction of the 77th Street extension and underpass is tentatively scheduled to start in 2019. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: There is no financial impac t to applying for the funds. I f suc cessful the funds would complete the estimated construction c ost for the project of $17M. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney reviewed the resolution and will be available to answer questions. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Council may c hoose not to adopt the resolution and therefore not submit an application for the federal funds. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO APPLY FOR THE TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND ACCEPT FUNDS IF CHOSEN WHEREAS, that the City of Richfield acts as the legal sponsor for the 77th Street Underpass Project contained in the Transportation Economic Development (TED) Program Application to be submitted on September 15, 2017 and that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to apply to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Richfield. WHEREAS, that the City of Richfield has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure matching funds and adequate construction of the proposed project. WHEREAS, that the City of Richfield has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. WHEREAS, that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Richfield may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above- referenced project(s), and that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements. WHEREAS, that, the City of Richfield and other stakeholders have committed over $20,000,000 towards the local match requirement. WHEREAS, that, the City of Richfield confirms if the project cost increases above the amount listed in the Application, the City of Richfield will provide or secure all additional funds necessary to complete the project. The City of Richfield certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and rules of the Application. WHEREAS, that the sources and uses, private investors, equity, and other financing commitment represented in the attached document are accurate. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager or their successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements, and amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.H. STAFF REPORT NO. 128 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A ssistant C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 9/6/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: J im Topi tzhofer, Recreation S ervices D i rector C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution r e-approving site plans for a community band shell at Veterans Memor ial P ark. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On J uly 12, 2016, the C ity Council approved site plans for a community band shell at Veterans Memorial Park (the "Band S hell"). Sinc e that time, a sound study has been c onducted (in acc ordance with the approved resolution) and the projec t has been put out to bid a number of times. Previous bids were rejected because the bids exceeded the amount of funding secured. On J uly 25, 2017 the Council awarded a contrac t to Fendler Patterson C onstruc tion Group. Foundation work for the Band Shell is expec ted to take plac e this year, with completion of the structure in the spring. Awarding a c ontrac t has taken longer than expec ted and the site plan must now be re-approved. No changes have been made to the plans that were reviewed and rec ommended for approval on J uly 12, 2016. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution for site plan approval for a band shell at Veterans Memorial Park. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The c ommunity and Counc il have identified c onstruc tion of a bandshell/amphitheater/performanc e stage in a community park as a goal in a variety of long-range plans. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Parks and related rec reational facilities are permitted in all zoning districts. Site plan approval is required prior to the c onstruc tion of any building in the C ity. Site plan approvals expire after one y ear if substantial construction has not taken place. Neither the proposed plans nor the City 's review requirements have c hanged since 2016. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of this item at their A ugust 28, 2017 meeting. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Construction is antic ipated to begin in September/Oc tober. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Band S hell Budget: $538,545 Funding Sourc es: $250,000 - Capital I mprovement Budget $75,000 - Additional City funds approved by Council (J uly 8, 2014) $213,545 - Donations E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : None ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Approve the resolution with modifications. Deny the request with findings that the proposed use does not meet requirements. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: J im Topitzhofer, Recreation Services Director AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter Requirements E xhibit P roposed P lans E xhibit P lanning & Zoning Maps E xhibit Resident L etter B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. _______ RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO ALLOW A COMMUNITY BAND SHELL AT VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the City of Richfield which requests approval of site plan to allow a community band shell Veterans Memorial Park; WHEREAS, the requested site plan has been reviewed by the City Council and meets City requirements; and WHEREAS, the proposed site plan will adequately serve the purpose for which it is proposed and will not have an adverse effect upon the public safety or general welfare; and WHEREAS, the City has fully considered the request for approval of the site plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council adopts as its Findings of Fact the WHEREAS clauses set forth above. 2. A site plan for a community bandshell as described in City Council Report No. ___, on the Subject Property legally described above is approved. 3. The approved site plan is subject to the following conditions: • Final building material selections must be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a building permit; • Installation of required landscaping along 66th Street may be delayed in order to coordinate with 66th Street reconstruction; • A Noise Control Plan similar to, or more robust than, that described City Council Report No. 111 must be continuously in place; • The applicant is responsible for obtaining all required permits, compliance with all requirements detailed in the City’s Administrative Review Committee Report and compliance with all other City and State regulations. Permits are required prior to the commencement of any work; • This approval shall expire one year following the date of approval unless the use has commenced or a building permit has been obtained and construction begun. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. ______________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Site Plan Approval (Subsection 547.13) In evaluating a site plan, the Planning Commission and Council shall consider its compliance with the following: a) Consistency with the various elements and objectives of the City’s long range plans including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Plan. A community band shell and/or amphitheater has been identified in numerous long-range policy documents over the past many years. These documents include the 1985 Veterans Memorial Park Master Plan, the 2001 Richfield 2020 Visioning Report, and the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. • Veterans Memorial Park Master Plan approved August 26, 1985. • Richfield 2020: o Pg. 11 – “Construct a natural amphitheater in a suitable community park to accommodate an expanded summer concert program. Construct a permanent stage area which includes state-of-the art sound and light equipment. • 2008 Comprehensive Plan o Pg. 7-9 – “Most community facilities and festivals are located in Veterans Memorial Park. Improvements to this park should be a high priority.” o Pg. 7-13 – “performance stage” identified as potential improvement within Augsburg Park. b) Consistency with the purposes of the Zoning Code. The purposes of the Zoning Code include: assisting in the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan; creating harmonious and workable relationships among land uses; and more. The proposal is not inconsistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code. c) Preservation of the site in its natural state, insofar as practicable, by minimizing tree and soil removal, and designing any grade changes so as to be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed or developing areas. The proposed building has been designed so as to compliment the surrounding area. d) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with the terrain and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the proposed development. Building materials, building location and building orientation have all been designed to coordinate with the surrounding natural and man-made amenities, in addition to the nearby residential neighborhoods. e) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features including: i. Creation of an internal sense of order for the various functions and buildings on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community; ii. Appropriateness of the amount and arrangement of open space and landscaping to the design and function of the development; iii. Appropriateness of the materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept of the project and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and functions; and iv. Adequacy of vehicular, cycling and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking, in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian, cycling and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking so as to be safe, convenient and, insofar as practicable, compatible with the design of proposed buildings, structures and neighboring properties. The proposed plans address internal circulation through the provision of adequate parking on site; additional accessible parking spaces and an accessible walkway; convenient additional bicycle parking; and integration with existing park paths/walkways. The building and location are sensitive to the surrounding buildings and park. f) Creation of an energy-conserving design through design location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures, and the use of landscape materials and site grading. As a protective measure for area birds, no glass will be used in the structure. g) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for such matters as surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air, and those aspects of design, not adequately covered by other regulations, which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Adequate provisions are in place to protect neighboring land uses from substantial effects, including a noise control plan. NORTH SCALE IN FEET 30'0 60' EXISTING CONDITIONS:SITE PREPARATION / EROSION CONTROLArchitectsLinner Morschen10100 Morgan Avenue S.Bloomington, MN 55431PHONE: (952) 884-6455Drawn Checked Date Job Number Sheet RevisionsI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: LICENSE #LARRY WACKER1257914249 June 22, 2017 GAJ LW BID SETVETERAN'S PARKRICHFIELD, MN 55423CITY OF RICHFIELDBAND SHELL6/22/17C1-1 Gopher State One Call 1. Benchmark: Top nut of fire hydrant located at the northeast corner of Hockey arena. Elevation =827.60 Feet (City of Richfield Datum) NOTE: FOR SIGNED SURVEY INFORMATION, PLEASE SEE LOUCKS SURVEY DATED 8/14/14 AND SUNDE SURVEY DATED 1/10/14. PROJECT LIMITSNORTH SCALE IN FEET 30'0 60' SITE PREPARATION / EROSION CONTROL:FIRE LANE4'-0"2" X 4" WOOD STAKE, POSITIONED ASNOTED. STRING 4' HIGH, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING BETWEEN WOOD STAKES PLACED 5' ON CENTER AND PLACED EXISTING GRADE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN TREE PROTECTION NOTE: INSTALL SNOW FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL ROOTZONES OF THE TREES. FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' TO THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES BEING PROTECTED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTIONAREAS THAT INSTRUCTS WORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL SHOULD BEPROTECTED FROM EROSION AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE "TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK IS WOUNDED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TO THE WOUND IN ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WILT. ALL DAMAGE TO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THEATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. BETWEEN TREE PROTECTION AND Tree Protection.DWG TREE PROTECTION NOT TO SCALE DRIP EDGE OF TREE DISTURBED AREAS. 2 C1-2 P LEGEND EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTECTED - SEE 2/C1-1 SITE PREPARATION / EROSION CONTROLArchitectsLinner Morschen10100 Morgan Avenue S.Bloomington, MN 55431PHONE: (952) 884-6455Drawn Checked Date Job Number Sheet RevisionsI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: LICENSE #LARRY WACKER1257914249 June 22, 2017 GAJ LW BID SETVETERAN'S PARKRICHFIELD, MN 55423CITY OF RICHFIELDBAND SHELL6/22/17C1-2 Gopher State One Call 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE WORK. 2. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 3. LOCATION AND SIZES OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE SHOWN BASED ON FIELD LOCATION OF VIEWABLE FIXTURES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH GOPHER ONE AND LOCAL UTILITY SERVICES. PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OR MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' CLEARANCE). 4. NO CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION OR COMMERCIAL POWER MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OPERATED WITHIN THE CITY BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6:00 PM AND 7:00AM ON WEEKDAYS OR DURING ANY HOURS ON SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS AND STATE AND FEDERAL HOLIDAYS, EXCEPT UNDER PERMIT. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING SITE FEATURES TO REMAIN. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING SITE FEATURES SHALL BE REPORTED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 6. LOCATIONS FOR STORING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. ANY DAMAGE TO THE PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND CURBS DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE REPLACED BY A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WITH THE CITY OF RICHFIELD. RESTORATION WORK MUST BE DONE UNDER A PERMIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS. 8. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND POST-CONSTRUCTION PARKING SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. NO ON-STREET PARKING / LOADING / UNLOADING ALLOWED. 9. BITUMINOUS REMOVAL SHALL INCLUDE ALL SURFACING AND BASE MATERIAL. TUBULAR SEDIMENT CONTROL SEE 1/C1-2 1. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON EROSION CONTROL PLAN PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCE. INSTALL SEDIMENT FILTERS IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURE. 2. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AREAS. REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING OCCURS AND MAY BE ORDERED BY INSPECTORS AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHTOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 3. SLOPES MUST BE STABILIZED BY BEING SEEDED AND COVERED WITH AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR MULCHED WITH A TACKIFYING AGENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER GRADING AND NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS. 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATIONS SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE MAINTAINED IN GOOD CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR/PERMITTEE UNTIL THE SITE HAS BEEN RE-VEGETATED, AT WHICH TIME THEY SHALL BE REMOVED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. FOR PROPOSED PAVED SURFACE AREA. 5. LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABLILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN TWO FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24 HOURS. SUFFICIENT TOPSOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL FOR DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE TO BE REVEGETATED. 6. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS, WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS. CATCH BASIN INSERTS OR OTHER APPROVED PRODUCT ARE REQUIRED IN UNDISTURBED AREAS THAT MAY RECIEVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA. HAY BALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION. 7. THE CONTRACTOR/PERMITTEE SHALL SCHEDULE SITE GRADING, UTILITY INSTALLATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS SO THAT THE GENERAL SITE CAN BE MULCHED AND RE-SEEDED SOON AFTER DISTURBANCE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING OR AFTER 14 DAYS OF GRADING INACTIVITY. ALL MULCH MATERIAL SHALL BE DISCED INTO THE SOIL IN DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE STORMWATER FLOW OVER SUCH AREAS. AN EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON AREAS TO BE PAVED IS RECOMMENDED THEREFORE MINIMIZING EROSION POTENTIAL. 8. ALL CONCRETE RELATED PRODUCTION, CLEANING AND MIXING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA ON THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THE WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STORM SEWER CONVEYANCE. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 2"X2" WOODEN STAKE @ 10' O.C. 12" FILTREXX COMPOST SILTSOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTE: TUBULAR SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE SHALL BE 12" FILTREXX COMPOST SILTSOXX BY FILTREXX INTERNATIONAL (440-926-2607) OR APPROVED EQUAL. TUBULAR SEDIMENT CONTROL NOT TO SCALE 1 C1-2 X X X X X REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING P P PROJECT LIM I T S REMOVE CURBREMOVE AND SALVAGE SIGN REMOVE AND SALVAGE SIGN REMOVE AND SALVAGE SIGN 75' W E T L A N D SETB A C KPROTECT EXISTING 4" PVC - BURY DEPTH 18"X CHAIN LINK CONSTRUCTION FENCE - 6' HIGH16' GATE 3' GATE REMOVECURBREMOVECURBSAWCUT SAWCUT SAWCUTSAWCUTSAWCUT 1. Benchmark: Top nut of fire hydrant located at the northeast corner of Hockey arena. Elevation =827.60 Feet (City of Richfield Datum) CHAIN LINK CONSTRUCTION FENCE NOT TO SCALE 3 C1-2 STEEL POST EVERY 10'-0" O.C. PLACE TIES EVERY 16" ON EACH POST. 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FABRIC CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL FENCE AND MAINTAINDURING PROJECT COMPLETION. FENCE TO BEREMOVED BY OWNER FOLLOWING ESTABLISHMENT. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 1 02/01/17 NORTHSCALE IN FEET 20'0 40' LAYOUT PLAN: LEGEND STRUCTURE BANDSHELL S E TBACK 7 5 ' W E T LAND 3" BITUMINOUS SURFACING MINIMUM BASE OF 6" COMPACTED AGGREGATE. SLOPE AT 2% (MIN.) - 2% (MAX.) TO DOWNHILL EDGE. BEVEL AND COMPACT ALL EDGES AT 45 DEGREES. COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.ArchitectsLinner Morschen10100 Morgan Avenue S.Bloomington, MN 55431PHONE: (952) 884-6455Drawn Checked Date Job Number Sheet RevisionsI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: LICENSE #LARRY WACKER1257914249 June 22, 2017 GAJ LW BID SETVETERAN'S PARKRICHFIELD, MN 55423CITY OF RICHFIELDBAND SHELL6/22/171. ELECTRONIC DATA IS AVAILABLE FROM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SITE LAYOUT. 2. VERIFY LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND / OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. 3. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED SITE AMENITIES ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.LAYOUT PLAN / DETAILSC2-1 SEE ARCH SHEETS LC 16.00'R5' SURFACING CONCRETE SURFACING SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 5" THICK CONCRETE WALK UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED 4" AGGREGATE BASE - SEE SPECS 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL CUT BACK MATERIAL 1/2" EXPANSION & CONSTRUCTION JOINT BELOW FINISH SURFACE SUBGRADE ENLARGEMENT 'A' SEE ENLARGEMENT 'A' EXP. JOINT AT END OF EACH POUR AND AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND AT ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, RAMPS, WALLS AND OTHER VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS. NOTES: 1. STANDARD FINISH TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC 2. MAXIMUM CONTROL JOINT GRID SIZE SHALL BE 5'X5' CURB RAMP SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0" FAJFL EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT SEE SPECS 10 : 1 M A X 10:1 M A X CAST IRON 24"X24" TRUNCATED DOME PANELS WITH UNPAINTED FINISH BY NEENAH FOUNDRY (952-445-5335) OR APPROVED EQUAL COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1-1/2" SURFACE COURSE 1-1/2" BASE COURSE 7" AGGREGATE BASE BITUMINOUS SURFACING SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" BITUMINOUS SURFACING - VEHICULAR SEE 5/L1.2 12"6"0.53' 9" 6"6"CONDITION VARIES SEE PLANS 7" AGGREGATE BASE SEE SPECS COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SEE GRADING PLANS FOR SLOPE DIRECTION NOTES: 1. PLACE CONTRACTION JOINTS EVERY 10' O.C. B6-12 CONCRETE CURB SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" 8:1 M A X PEDESTRIAN 6" THICK CONCRETE ON 4" THICK AGGREGATE BASE 1 C2-1 2 C2-1 3 C2-1 5 C2-1 BITUMINOUS SURFACING - TRAIL NOT TO SCALE 6 C2-1 R5' R5' R3'6"5.00 ' R 1 5 5 . 0 0 ' CP BITUMINOUS SURFACING BY OWNER CURB RAMP SEE 2/C2-1 CURB RAMP SEE 2/C2-1 BY OWNER B6-12 CONCRETE CURB SEE 1/C2-1 10.00' R20' R20' R20' R20' BITUMINOUS EXISTING 4" PVC - BURY DEPTH 18"6"LAYOUT NOTES EXISTING WALKMATCH WIDTH AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING WALK R5' R5' MATCH WIDTH AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING WALK BICYCLE RACKS ON CONCRETE PAD MATCH WIDTH AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING WALK MATCH WIDTH AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING WALK MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL COLORED CONCRETE WITH SAWCUT JOINTS - 2.5' GRID PATTERN - SEE 3/C2-1 COLORED CONCRETE SURFACING WITH SAWCUT JOINTS - SEE 3/C2-1 CONCRETE SURFACING SEE 3/C2-1 5.08 '5.00 '8.00'14. 6 6 ' SURFACING BY OWNER BITUMINOUS CONCRETE WALK WITH PAVER BASE SECTION SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 4 C2-1 5.00'1.00'1.00'0.27'CONCRETE SURFACING SEE 3/C2-1 EXTEND CLASS 5 BASE 12" PAST EDGE OF CONCRETE, PLACE GEOFABRIC BETWEEN TOP OF CLASS 5 AND TOPSOIL CURB RAMP SEE 2/C2-1 SEE 1/C3-1 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SEE 1/C3-1 CONCRETE SURFACING WITH TOOLED JOINTS - SEE 3/C2-1 5 . 0 0 '9.5'8.0'R5' E.J. E.J. SEE ARCH PLANS SAW CUT JOINTS AND COLORED CONCRETE BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY OWNER ON ROUGH GRADE PREPARED BY CONTRACTOR. SEE 5/C2-1 AND 6/C2-189.67'54.46' 42.43d 1-1/4" TOOLED CONTROL JOINT- SEE PLAN FOR LAYOUT OF SAWCUT AND TOOLED JOINTS CONCRETE SURFACING WITH PAVER BASE AND TOOLED JOINTS- SEE 3/C2-1 AND 4/C2-1 STRIPING TO MATCH EXISTING 4" FFE 828.00 826.58 825.20 1 . 8%3.0%4.8%8 2 6 827 826826.80 826.50 826.50 825.35826 8 2 7 825.50 826.13 826.50 TW 826.13 8 2 5 82582582582 6 825.60 TW 828.00 TW 826.50 TW 828.00 827.25 828.00 828.00 827.25 826.42 826.60 825.04 825.20 825.07 825.10 2%2%2%GB 827.88 1. ALL WALKS TO HAVE 2% CROSS SLOPE. MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 2. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ALL WALKWAYS SHALL BE 20:1 3. MAXIMUM SLOPE ON ALL LAWN AREAS SHALL BE 4:1 4. ANY ADJUSTMENT TO GRADING PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. WALK ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO CONFORM WITH ADJACENT GRADE. ADJUSTMENTS MAY BE MADE AFTER REVIEW OF STAKING IN THE FIELD. 6. ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, CURBS AND PAVEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED BY A REGISTERED SURVEYOR FOR REVIEW BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 7. BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE INSTALLED BY OWNER ON ROUGH GRADE PREPARED BY CONTRACTOR. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE AND REPLACE SOILS BENEATH THE BAND SHELL STRUCTURE TO A DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 10-FT BELOW THE EXISTING GRADES. THE EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL WORK WILL BE PAID FOR ON A UNIT PRICE BASIS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENTER UNIT PRICES AS REQUIRED ON THE BID FORM. 9. BRAUN INTERTEC WILL PERFORM ALL SOIL COMPACTION TESTING ON THE PROJECT. BRAUN WILL ALSO IDENTIFY EXCAVATED SOILS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR REUSE AND SOILS THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH BRAUN AS NEEDED TO PERFORM SOILS TESTING PROCEDURES. THE OWNER WILL PAY FOR ALL SOILS TESTING SERVICES. NORTH SCALE IN FEET 20'0 40' GRADING PLAN:ArchitectsLinner Morschen10100 Morgan Avenue S.Bloomington, MN 55431PHONE: (952) 884-6455Drawn Checked Date Job Number Sheet RevisionsI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: LICENSE #LARRY WACKER1257914249 June 22, 2017 GAJ LW BID SETVETERAN'S PARKRICHFIELD, MN 55423CITY OF RICHFIELDBAND SHELL6/22/17GRADING PLANC3-1 AREA CALCULATIONS: TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 31,195 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 3592 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS - HARDSCAPE 6,411 SF PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS - BUILDING 1,670 SF EXISTING 4" PVC - BURY DEPTH 18"Gopher State One Call GRADING NOTES GRADI N G LI MI T S GRADING L I M I T S G R A D I N G L I M I T S TW 828.00 BW 826.13 BW 826.50 TW 826.66 TW 828.00 BW 826.50 BW 826.13 TW 826.66 TW 827.33 TW 828.00 TW 827.33 TW 828.00 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 C3-1 WEST EAST FINISH GRADE IN BACK OF WALL FINISH GRADE IN FRONT OF WALL 4" CAP BLOCK (TYP) RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. WALL IS DRAWN ON A FLAT PLANE - 8" BLOCK WITH 4" CAPS 2. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 3. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR JOINT DETAIL BETWEEN WALL ENDS AND BUILDING. 4. 4" CAP SHALL BE GREY, 8" BLOCK SHALL BE TAN. 5. WALL FACES SHALL BE FLAT WITH NO BATTER. 12' LENGTH - 7' OUTSIDE RADIUS6.66' STRAIGHT 12' LENGTH - 7' OUTSIDE RADIUS 6.66' STRAIGHT WALL SHALL EXTEND ONE FULL BLOCK MINIMUM BELOW GRADE LEGEND: EXISTING SPOT PROPOSED SPOT GRADE BREAK TOP OF WALL EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR 826.50 TW 828.00 GB 827.88 MODULAR UNIT RETAINING WALL 6" CLASS V BASE 3 4" CLEAR AGGREGATE 12" THICK MIN APPLY ADHESIVE BETWEEN THE CAP AND FIRST BLOCK COURSE AND BETWEEN THE FIRST AND SECOND BLOCK COURSES COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SECTION (TYP) NOT TO SCALE 2 C3-1 COLORED CONCRETE SURFACING WITH SAWCUT JOINTS SEE 3/2-1 FFE 828.00 NORTHSCALE IN FEET 20'0 40' LANDSCAPE PLAN STRUCTUREBANDSHELL EXISTING WALK S E T B A C K 7 5 ' W E T L AND ArchitectsLinner Morschen10100 Morgan Avenue S.Bloomington, MN 55431PHONE: (952) 884-6455Drawn Checked Date Job Number Sheet RevisionsI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: LICENSE #LARRY WACKER1257914249 June 22, 2017 GAJ LW BID SETVETERAN'S PARKRICHFIELD, MN 55423CITY OF RICHFIELDBAND SHELL6/22/17LANDSCAPE PLANL1-1 SEE ARCH SHEETS LC CP EXISTING 4" PVC - BURY DEPTH 18"EXISTING WALKLEGEND: TURF SEED MIX - MNDOT 25-131 CONIFEROUS TREES COMMENTSSIZEQTY. PLANT LIST COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 8' B.B.TECHNY ARBORVITAE Picea glauca densata COMMON HACKBERRY 1. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, OR PLANTING BEDS. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL ACTIVITIES WITH GENERAL SITE CONTRACTOR. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY SOIL OR WATER CONCERNS WHICH BECOME APPARENT AFTER DIGGING HOLES FOR PLANTING. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION FOR PLANTINGS. HAND DIGGING MAY BE NECESSARY. 5. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE TYPE 5 WOOD FIBER HYDROMULCH CONFORMING TO MnDOT 3884 PLACED AT 2000LBS. PER ACRE. 6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF ROUGH GRADING, WITH REVEGETATION TO OCCUR WITHIN 48 HOURS. 7. ALL AREAS SEEDED WITH TURF SEED MIX SHALL RECEIVE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER @ 200LBS. PER ACRE. 8. ALL AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 9. SCARIFY ALL LAWN AREAS TO A DEPTH OF 4" PRIOR TO INSTALLING TURF SEED MIX. DECIDUOUS TREES Celtis occidentalis 2-1/2" B.B. LANDSCAPE NOTES 7 7 (7) TECHNY ARBORVITAE (4) SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE (1) BUR OAK RED SUNSET MAPLE Acer rubrum 'Franksred'6 (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (2) RED SUNSET MAPLE (2) RED SUNSET MAPLE BUR OAK Quercus macrocarpa1 IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Impcole'2 (2) RED SUNSET MAPLE (3) COMMON HACKBERRY SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE Malus 'Spring Snow'2" B.B.4 2-1/2" B.B. 2-1/2" B.B. 2-1/2" B.B. (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (2) RED SUNSET MAPLE BY OTHERS BY OTHERS BY OTHERS BY OTHERS BY OTHERS BY OTHERS ALL TREES WILL BE PROVIDED AND PLANTED BY THE OWNER. NOTE AREA SHALL BE PREPARED FOR INSTALLATION OF A 3" MULCH LAYER BY OWNER PLASTIC EDGING - SEE SPECS INSTALL 12" PAST ROOF DRIP LINE T.O. SLAB IN FRONT B.O. TRUSS IN FRONT B.O. TRUSS IN BACK 100' - 0" 118' - 0" 112' - 0" AB T.O. SLAB IN FRONT 100' - 0" 1 2 B.O. TRUSS IN FRONT 118' - 0" B.O. TRUSS IN BACK 112' - 0" GRADE 98' - 8" 118' - 0" 112' - 0" B.O. TRUSS IN FRONT B.O. TRUSS IN BACK T.O. SLAB IN BACK 100' - 2" 12 TOP OF SLAB VARIES T.O. FOOTING 96' - 0" - VERIFY TRUSS BEARING VARIES T.O. FOOTING 96'-0" T.O. SLAB 100'-2"ArchitectsLinner Morschen10100 Morgan Avenue S.Bloomington, MN 55431PHONE: (952) 884-6455Drawn Checked Date Job Number Sheet RevisionsI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPRINT NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE: LICENSE #Loren Morschen23564CITY OF RICHFIELDBAND SHELLVETERAN'S PARKRICHFIELD, MN 5542306/22/161 A1 1730 06-22-17 JDZ LMEXTERIOR ELEVATIONSWALL SECTIONSDETAILS06/28/2017 5TH67TH 11TH12TH66TH HIGHWAY 62 PORTLAND10THPARK64TH 6 2 N D 63RD ELLIOTCHICAGOOAKLANDCOLUMBUS65TH P O R T L A N D A V E T O E B H W Y 6 2 64TH HIGHWAY 62 62N D R R C-2 R R R R R R R R R R MR-2 R R RC-2 R R R R R R R R R RR C-2 R R R R RR R RRRRR R RRRRRRRRRRR R R R R R R R R R R R R RR RRRRRRR R R RRRR R RR RRRRR R R R R R R R R R R RR R R R R RRRRRRR R R R R R R RRRRRRRRR RRRR C-2 R R C-2 R R RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R R C-2C-2 C-2 C-2 RR MR-2RR RRRRRRRRRR R RRRRRR MR-2 R R MR-2 MR-2MR-2 MR-2 MR-2MR-2MR-2 R R R ±0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250FeetC-2 - General CommercialR - Single Family ResidentialMR-2 Multi-Family Residential Path: I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\Vets Park Bandshell Z.mxd 350 Feet Veterans Park Bandshell Site Plan 6/2016Surrounding Zoning 5TH67TH 11TH12TH66TH HIGHWAY 62 PORTLAND10THPARK64TH 6 2 N D 63RD ELLIOTCHICAGOOAKLANDCOLUMBUS65TH P O R T L A N D A V E T O E B H W Y 6 2 64TH HIGHWAY 62 62N D PRK HDR CC MHD CC CC PRK CC CC PRK MDR MHDNCNC CC CC CC PRK LDR LDR LDR LDR MDR MDRMDR MDR LDR LDR LDR MDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR MDR LDR LDR MDR MDR PRK LDR LDR LDRLDR LDRLDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR MDR LDR LDRLDR LDRLDR LDRLDR LDRLDR LDR LDR LDRLDRLDRLDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDR LDRLDRLDRLDRLDR PRK LDRLDR LDR LDR LDR MDR LDR LDR LDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDR LDRLDRLDRLDR LDR MDR MDRMDRMDR MDR LDR LDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDR PRK LDR MDR MDR LDR LDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDR LDR LDRLDRLDRLDRLDRLDR MDR PRK MDR PRKPRK LDR LDR LDR LDRLDR LDR LDR MDR MDR LDRLDR ±0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250FeetPRK - ParklandLDR - Low Density ResidentialMDR - Medium Density ResidentialMHD - Medium-High Density ResidentialHDR - High Density ResidentialCC - Community CommercialNC - Neighborhood Commercial Path: I:\GIS\Community Development\Staff\Planning Tech\Projects\Vets Park Bandshell CP.mxd 350 Feet Veterans Park Bandshell Site Plan 6/2016Surrounding Comprehensive Plan AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.I. STAFF REPORT NO. 129 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A ssistant C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 9/6/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a first reading of an ordinance to change the zoning of a number of properties between 66th and 68th Streets and 17th and C edar Avenues fr om Mixed Use - Community (MU-C) and Multi-Family Residential (MR-2) with the Cedar Avenue Cor ridor Overlay (C AC) to Planned Multi-Family Residential (P MR). E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: I nland Development P artners ("I nland") is proposing to build 3 new apartment buildings (284 new units total) and renovate 3 existing apartment buildings (33 units). The applicant is requesting a c hange to the City's Comprehensive P lan and Zoning designations in order to make this possible. This first reading is an administrative requirement and does not obligate the C ounc il to approve the ordinance upon sec ond reading; nor does it obligate the C ounc il to approve the C omprehensive Plan amendment or specific land use plans. The second reading, C omprehensive Plan amendment, and final development plans will be considered by the Council on September 26, 2017. The c ity began work to redevelop this area in 2002 in reac tion to runway expansion at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport. A combination of market factors stalled this work. I nland first approached the city with preliminary plans for the development of approximately 300 apartments in the Cedar Corridor on September 22, 2015. This proposal and the potential impac t of the tunnel under Highway 77 prompted the c ity to revisit the 2004 Cedar Corridor Master Plan. Since that time, the Comprehensive Plan update and the projec t have moved forward somewhat conc urrently. The proposed projec t would be the first new multi-family apartment project construc ted on the c ity's east side sinc e 1971. The project addresses the noise/vibration issues that originally prompted redevelopment by providing a buffer to the older, single-family homes to the west, but also addresses a number of current goals and policies of the C edar Corridor Master Plan: To establish a renewed brand at a signature gateway to the city ; To increase the diversity of housing options; and To encourage the rehabilitation and replac ement of the lowest-quality housing stoc k. As part of the master plan update, the alignment of Richfield Parkway moved from C edar Avenue to 18th Avenue. This, combined with the city 's increased focus on the preservation of existing affordable housing, has shaped the placement and design of the proposed buildings. W hile removal of the existing three buildings would allow the project to shift to the east and eliminate the need for a Comprehensive Plan amendment, both staff and the developer feel that renovation would be a better c hoice that will preserve existing affordable units and avoid displacing current residents. The three buildings will be fully incorporated into the development and tenants will have acc ess to all of the amenities of the new buildings. The proposed projec t attempts to mimic the general architec ture of the nearby housing and exceeds minimum setbac k requirements in order to minimize shadows on adjac ent single-family properties. The development is attractively designed, with signific ant landscaping and minimal views of surfac e parking lots. Landscaping throughout the project is extensive and includes the three existing buildings along Cedar Avenue. These properties will receive the foundation planting and parking lot sc reening that are required of any new development. The project provides nearly double the required outdoor space for a project of this size and impervious surfac e is well-below allowable limits. All apartment residents will have ac cess to a number of amenities that are desired and expected in new c onstruc tion, but found in few properties in Richfield; inc luding a dog area, pool, outdoor terrace, c ommunity gardens, play ground, exerc ise and group fitness rooms, and a common spac e/club room. The development has been designed using C PTED (Crime Prevention through E nvironmental Design) strategies and the developer has met with the city 's Crime Prevention Specialist to ensure that they are taking the steps necessary to maintain a safe environment. Traffic will be well below that which was anticipated when the Ric hfield Parkway/66th Street roundabout was constructed and on-street parking along Richfield Parkway will help to slow traffic on this important bic ycle and pedestrian route. The proposal also designates spac e for public art. A public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on August 28, 2017. The Commission rec ommended approval of the proposal. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a first reading of an or dinance amending Appendix 1 of the Richfield City Code to change the z oning designation of Lots 4-13, Block 2 and Lots 1-8, Block 3 and Lots 1-16, Block 4 all in W exler's Addition from Mixed Use - Community (MU -C) and Multi-Family R esidential (MR-2) together with the Cedar Avenue Corridor Overlay (C AC ) D istrict to Planned Multi-Family R esidential (P MR). B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT To address the impac ts of low-frequency noise c reated by the proximity of a new airport runway, the c ity began purchasing homes in this area in 2002. Grant funds (sec ured through efforts by the Federal Aviation Agenc y and Metropolitan Airports Commission) provided the money for the acquisition and demolition of structures that were deemed incompatible with the vibration that planes would create. Additional funds to continue this work never materialized and the market for redevelopment dried up for a number of years. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): A first reading of an ordinance is an administrative requirement that does not bind the Council to any future approvals for the project. I n order to approve the sec ond reading of the c hange in zoning on September 26, the Council must also amend the City 's Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: I n 2016, the c ity adopted an updated Cedar Corridor Master Plan which has been inc orporated into the city 's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development would require an amendment to this plan in order to allow greater density on the east side of 18th Avenue, between 67th and 68th Streets. This area is c urrently designated as Medium-Density Residential and allows 7-12 dwelling units per ac re; the proposed project requests a density of 47 dwelling units per ac re and is in keeping with the Mixed Use Designation on the blocks to the north and east. W hile the inc rease in density on this block is large, the impac t that density will have on the projec t as a whole and the adjacent parcels is less than these numbers might portray. All access to the property will be from Ric hfield Parkway and residents traveling south from the development will be filtered east to Cedar Avenue until further c onstruc tion of Richfield Parkway takes plac e. The existing dead end at 67th Street and 17th Avenue will remain in place; new residents and guests will not be able to exit the development onto 67th S treet or 17th Avenue. The roundabout at 66th Street has the capacity to handle the additional traffic that would be generated. The proposed plan meets the intent of the Cedar C orridor and Comprehensive Plans in more ways than it does not. Staff is c ontinuing to evaluate whether or not further amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is warranted; spec ific ally to east side of 17th Avenue between 67th and 68th Streets. This issue may be brought bac k to policy makers in the future. Zoning C onsiderations: The Mixed Use - Community and Multi-Family Residential D istricts within the Cedar Corridor Overlay area are intended to produc e structures of c onsistent c haracter and appropriate scale that transition from single-family residential to higher density mixed use. Buildings are expected to take advantage of and help realize the importanc e of Richfield Parkway as an significant north-south connec tor and neighborhood amenity. The developer is requesting to rezone the property as a Planned Unit Development. Planned Unit Developments are intended to encourage the efficient use of land and resourc es and to encourage innovation in planning and building. I n exchange for these effic iencies and superior design, flexibility in the application of dimensional requirements is available. The projec t provides nearly double the required outdoor open space for a project this size. There are a number of different sets of review criteria that apply to this proposal. A full discussion of all requirements is inc luded as an attachment to this report. Guiding Distric ts for the proposal are the MR-3 (High-Density Residential), MU-C (Mixed Use - Community) and C A C (C edar Avenue C orridor) Overlay Districts. The following variations from standard requirements are requested: Building Height - The proposed Building B (west side of Richfield Parkway between 67th and 68th Streets) exc eeds the current district (MR-2) height allowanc e by 3 feet. The proposal does not exceed the height limits of any of the proposed guiding districts. Parking - I ncluding on-street parking, the proposed project provides 1.24 spaces per unit; the MR-3 Distric t requires 1.25 spaces per unit. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: 60-D AY RUL E: The 60-day clock 'started' when a c omplete application was rec eived on August 14, 2017. A dec ision is required by Oc tober 13, 2017 or the Counc il must notify the applic ant that it is extending the deadline (up to a maximum of 60 additional days or 120 day s total) for issuing a decision. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The Housing and Redevelopment A uthority approved a Development A greement with I nland Development Partners on August 29, 2017. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Final C ounc il consideration is scheduled for September 26. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: I nland Development Partners Representatives AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type D raft Ordi nance - Rezoning Ordinance P roject Narrati ve E xhibit P roposed P lans 1 of 2 E xhibit P roposed P lans 2 of 2 E xhibit Renderi ngs E xhibit S hadow S tudy E xhibit DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX I TO THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE BY REZONING LOTS 4-13, BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 1-8, BLOCK 3 AND LOTS 1-16, BLOCK 4 ALL IN WEXLER’S ADDITION AS PLANNED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (PMR) THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Section 9 of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code is amended by adding the following: (8) M-9, Lots 4-13, Block 2 and Lots 1-8, Block 3 and Lots 1-16, Block 4, Wexler’s Addition. Sec. 2. Section 13, Paragraph (45) of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code are repealed: (45) M-9 (W of 18th, between 67th and 68th). Lots 1-8, Block 3, Wexlers Addition. Sec. 3. Section 17, Paragraphs (16) and (17) of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code are repealed: (16) M-9 (S of roundabout, 17th to 18th) Lots 4-16, Block 2, Wexler's Addition. (17) M-9 (18th to Cedar, 67th to 68th). Block 4, Wexler's Addition. Sec. 4. Section 21, Paragraphs (1) and (2) of Appendix I of the Richfield Zoning Code are repealed: (1) M-9 (S of roundabout between 17th & 18th) Lots 4-16, Block 2, Wexlers Addition. (2) M-9 (18th to Cedar, 67th to 68th). Block 4, Wexler's Addition. Sec. 5. This ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Page 1 of 3 Project Narrative: The Chamberlain Apartments The Chamberlain Apartments is a mixed market rate and affordable apartment community consisting of (3) 3-story apartment buildings on approximately 6.78 acres of land located south of 66th Street, west of Cedar Avenue, north of 68th Street and east of 17th Avenue S. The site is irregularly shaped and bisects the new Richfield Parkway and relocated 67th Street between the Parkway and Cedar Avenue. Each of the 3 buildings has just under a 100 dwelling units for a total of 284 new apartments. The associated parking is 333 stalls in a mix of surface (103 stalls) and below grade parking (230 stalls). The exterior aesthetic reflects an urban residential design that transitions from the design of the office/commercial to the north and east to the single family residential neighbor to the south and west. A sampling of property amenities includes: · Community room · Fitness center · Media room · Outdoor pool and amenity area · Grilling area · Bike storage and repair station · Storage lockers · Dog run · Play area · Community gardens · Underground garage parking · On-site management and maintenance The intent of this development is to provide a new type of rental project along the Richfield Parkway/Cedar Ave Corridor that meets Richfield’s Comprehensive Plan goal of “expanding housing choices, promoting modernization of the housing stock, maintaining affordability, and supporting attractive neighborhoods”. Based on this design we are able to save and refurbish the 3 existing apartment buildings while maintaining their affordability, and without relocating current residents. The design also buffers the existing single family homes from the noise of both the airport and traffic along Cedar Avenue (Highway 77). The Chamberlain Apartment project fulfills many of the goals of the current Richfield Comprehensive Plan’s Goals & Policies such as: 1. Land Use (Chapter 4) Goal: Maintain and enhance the “urban hometown” character of Richfield Policies: · Establish a land use pattern and supporting infrastructure that creates a “walkable” environment. o This project allows for the extension of Richfield Parkway south of 66th Street. Richfield parkway incorporates sidewalks and the Three Rivers Page 2 of 3 Bike Trail. These sidewalks and bike trail connect to existing residential neighborhoods and to commercial districts just north of 66th along both 17th Avenue S and Richfield Parkway. The construction of Richfield Parkway will continue to transform east Richfield into one of the most walkable neighborhoods in the City. · Maintain a housing supply that meets changing needs while sustaining the integrity of existing neighborhoods. o This project saves and renovates 3 existing apartment buildings (Cedar Pointe South – 6720-44 Cedar Ave) o This project also adds both market rate and affordable rental units for new and existing residents of Richfield · Encourage “green” building practices o Project will include storm water management practices that sustainably capture rainwater. In addition there will be butterfly and pollinator-friendly gardens and opportunities for urban micro-farming o Mechanical systems are energy efficient o Buildings don’t shadow adjacent single family homes. · Maintain and provide quality amenities and a safe living environment. o Project is designed with CPTED (crime prevention through environmental design) in mind to create a safe environment for residents and neighbors, such as eyes on the street from residences. o Project provides exterior amenities for residents that include grilling stations, pet relief area and pool. In addition to neighborhood amenities such as added sidewalks and bike paths. 2. Housing (Chapter 5) Goal: Maintain and enhance Richfield’s image as a community with strong, desirable and livable neighborhoods. Policies: · Encourage the use of quality, durable building and landscaping materials to maintain a high-quality standard in residential development. o Building design and landscaping for this project represent a luxury Class A apartment design and finishes · Support the rehabilitation and upgrading of the existing housing stock. o New buildings allow for existing Cedar Pointe South Apartments to remain and be renovated. Residents of existing buildings will have access to overall project amenities. · Maintain an appropriate mix of housing types in each neighborhood based on available amenities, transportation resources and adjacent land uses. o Project expands the existing sidewalk network to provide safe pedestrian access to 66th Street which has extensive bus service in addition to the commercial/retail center across 66th from the site. The site improvements also link existing bike trails to the larger regional trail system. Page 3 of 3 · Encourage the use of design elements and strategies to create safer streets; facilitate social interaction between neighbors; foster connections with nearby business; and enhance neighborhood character, such as sidewalks, traffic calming strategies, front porches, alley enhancements and open/green space. o As mentioned above this project is designed with CPTED strategies. o Outdoor amenities such as playground, grilling stations, pet relief area, and raised planting beds for urban micro-farming with facilitate social interaction. o Integrating sidewalks into project and limiting curb cuts will create safer streets. Goal: Ensure sufficient diversity in the housing stock to provide for a range of household sizes, income levels and needs. Policies: · Promote the development of a balanced housing stock that is available to a range of income levels. o New buildings provide housing type that doesn’t currently exist in the Cedar Avenue corridor. Also able to save and stabilize existing apartments as a more affordable multifamily housing option. The FAR is .87 and equates to 46.8 units/acre which is considered High Density Residential (HDR) per Richfield Zoning Classification for both units per acre and multi-unit and multi-building developments. However it should be noted that being 3 stories in height is within the maximum height for Medium-High Density Residential (MHD) of 4 stories. Currently the site is zoned Mixed-Use and Medium-Density Residential per current Richfield Comprehensive Plan (updated 4/2017). It should be noted in the most recent prior Comprehensive Plans (multiple examples from 2011 through 2016) the site was identified as High-Density Residential (HDR), which also includes the Cedar Avenue Corridor Redevelopment Masterplan Update dated September 2016. In conclusion, the Chamberlain Apartment project is consistent with the City of Richfield’s goals for the site and consistent with other Housing, Land Use and Transportation Goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, The Chamberlain is consistent with the following goals: · To maintain and enhance the “urban hometown” character of Richfield – by providing contemporary apartment living with all the amenities. (Cedar Study 9) · To develop identifiable nodes, corridors and gateways throughout the community – by reinforcing the Richfield Parkway design including pedestrian and bicyclist’s paths. (Cedar Study 9) · To increase the diversity of housing options – by providing maintenance free housing for empty nesters….life-cycle housing that currently doesn’t exist in this neighborhood (5.9) · Support the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing housing stock (5.10) - By renovating the existing 3 apartment buildings along Cedar Ave. We respectfully ask The City of Richfield to approve our PUD application and recommend amending the Comprehensive Plan for the entire site from C2 & MR3 to MR3 entirely to accommodate The Chamberlain project. DEVELOPER/CLIENT NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: INLAND DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS STEVE SCHWANKE 3340 REPUBLIC AVENUE ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 952.495.6244 SSCHWANKE@INLANDDP.COM CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO. DAVE ROLLINS 3433 BROADWAY STREET N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 612.332.7281 DAVE.ROLLINS@KRAUSANDERSON.COM ARCHITECT NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC TOD ELKINS 901 N 3RD. ST., SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-455-3100 TELKINS@URBAN-WORKS.COM SCOTT BECKMAN CIVIL ENGINEER - NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: WESTWOOD RYAN BLUHM 7699 ANAGRAM DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 952.937.5150 RYAN.BLUHM@WESTWOODPS.COM CONTACTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT - STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: BKBM ENGINEERS JOHN TIMM 5930 BROOKLYN BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429 763.843.0474 JTIMM@BKBM.COM MECHANICAL ENGINEER - NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: STEEN ENGINEERING INC. RICHARD BECKER 5430 DOUGLAS DRIVE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429-3106 763.585.6742 RICHARDB@STEENENG.COM INTERIOR DESIGNER SBECKMAN@URBAN-WORKS.COM NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: WESTWOOD NIC MEYER 7699 ANAGRAM DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 952.697.5766 NIC.MEYER@WESTWOODPS.COM NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC SARAH DAVIS 901 N 3RD. ST., SUITE 145 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-455-3100 SDAVIS@URBAN-WORKS.COM OWNER CONSULTANTELECTRICAL ENGINEER - NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: LEAF MOUNTAIN DESIGN & ENGINEERING BRUCE R RENO 4810 UNION TERRACE LN N PLYMOUTH, MN 55442 952.472.1369 BRENO@LMDENG.COM OWNER CONSULTANTOWNER CONSULTANTOWNER CONSULTANTDEVELOPER/CLIENT NAME: CONTACT: ADDRESS: PHONE No.: E-MAIL: KRAUS-ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT CO. MATT ALEXANDER 4210 W. OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437-2951 612.963.9401 MALEXANDER@KAREALTY.COM PETER OTT PETERO@STEENENG.COM ROBERT CUNNINGHAM BCUNNINHAM@INLANDDP.COM GENERAL NOTES 1.DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 2.SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND SHALL REVIEW THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE SCOPE OF THE WORK PRIOR COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR CLARIFICATION. BLDG -A RICHFIELD, MN N 6630 RICHFIELD PKWY BLDG -B 6700 RICHFIELD PKWY BLDG -C 6701 RICHFIELD PKWY NORTH ROOM NAME ROOM NAME # REV NO. SHT. REF. NO. SHT. REF. 24 1 SHT# 3 NO. SHT. REF. - - - - SYMBOLS Section identification SECTION MARKER Cut construction Sheet where elevation appears Elevation identification ELEVATION MARKER Sheet where section appears Cut construction Detail identification Sheet where detail appears DETAIL MARKER Detail identification PRIMARY ELEVATION MARKER Sheet where detail appears Isolates detail area DETAIL MARKER SECONDARY ELEVATION MARKER REVISION MARKER (top of parapet, sill, etc.) DOOR MARKER NORTH MARKER KEYNOTE ROOM TAG CEILING TAG WINDOW MARKER DOOR# MATERIAL KEYNOTE WDW KEY KEY KEY/ xxx xxx Subfloor Material 1 FLOOR TRANSITION TAG Subfloor Material 2 HEIGHT - MAT'L CRPADCARD READER TAG AUTOMATIC DOOR OPERATOR BUTTON Cedar Ave SE 68th St E 67th St E 66th St 17th Ave S16th Ave S18th Ave SHwy 77Longfellow Ave SE 67th St © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 3:31:36 PMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS/SB SB TITLE SHEET G001The ChamberlainApartmentsKEY PLAN 1" - 400'-0" TOTALS BLDG A BLDG B BLDG C TOTAL Compact Parking Stall 2 0 0 2 Handicap Parking Stall 7 4 4 15 Standard Parking Stall 73 70 70 213 Grand total 82 74 74 230 PARKING STALLS -INTERIOR UNIT COUNTAREA SUMMARY BLDG NAME LEVEL AREA BLDG - A BLDG_A SUBLEVEL 32269 SF BLDG - A BLDG_A LEVEL 1 31806 SF BLDG - A BLDG_A LEVEL 2 31726 SF BLDG - A BLDG_A LEVEL 3 31726 SF 127526 SF BLDG - B BLDG_B SUBLEVEL 27547 SF BLDG - B BLDG_B LEVEL 1 27145 SF BLDG - B BLDG_B LEVEL 2 27145 SF BLDG - B BLDG_B LEVEL 3 27145 SF 108982 SF BLDG - C BLDG_C SUBLEVEL 27547 SF BLDG - C BLDG_C LEVEL 1 27145 SF BLDG - C BLDG_C LEVEL 2 27145 SF BLDG - C BLDG_C LEVEL 3 27145 SF 108982 SF 345490 SF The Chamberlain Apartments Planning and Zoning Application | August 14, 2017 VICINITY MAP EXTERIOR PARKING SPACES LOCATION TOTALS Compact Parking Stall LOT 1 5 Handicap Parking Stall LOT 1 2 Standard Parking Stall LOT 1 21 28 HC Parallel Parking Stall LOT 2 1 Parallel Parking Stall LOT 2 18 Standard Parking Stall LOT 2 9 28 Parallel Parking Stall STREET PARKING 47 47 PARKING STALLS -EXTERIOR UNIT TYPE TOTAL ...MICRO-B 1 ..STUDIO-A 6 ..STUDIO-B 81 ..STUDIO-C 2 ..STUDIO-D 12 ..STUDIO-E 4 .ALCOVE-B 27 .ALCOVE-C 1 .ALCOVE-D 1 .ALCOVE-E 3 1 BR-A 6 1 BR-B 47 1 BR-C 2 1 BR-D 4 2 BR-A 3 2 BR-B 23 2 BR-C 33 2 BR-D 6 2 BR-E 2 2 BR-F 12 2 BR-G 6 3 BR-B 2 284 UNIT TYPE Area GROSS AREA 01st Floor 02nd Floor 03rd Floor TOTAL ...MICRO-B 343 SF 390 SF 1 0 0 1 ..STUDIO-A 508 SF 548 SF 1 1 0 2 ..STUDIO-B 508 SF 548 SF 12 12 13 37 .ALCOVE-B 575 SF 620 SF 1 1 1 3 .ALCOVE-C 764 SF 821 SF 0 0 1 1 .ALCOVE-D 681 SF 734 SF 0 0 1 1 .ALCOVE-E 706 SF 750 SF 1 1 1 3 1 BR-A 675 SF 724 SF 1 0 1 2 1 BR-B 674 SF 724 SF 0 2 1 3 1 BR-C 877 SF 930 SF 0 1 1 2 2 BR-A 1059 SF 1130 SF 0 1 0 1 2 BR-B 979 SF 1033 SF 3 4 4 11 2 BR-C 1057 SF 1130 SF 4 3 4 11 2 BR-D 1106 SF 1181 SF 2 2 2 6 2 BR-E 1062 SF 1116 SF 0 1 1 2 2 BR-F 959 SF 1015 SF 2 2 0 4 2 BR-G 932 SF 989 SF 0 0 2 2 3 BR-B 1316 SF 1381 SF 0 1 1 2 BLDG A 28 32 34 94 ..STUDIO-A 508 SF 548 SF 1 0 1 2 ..STUDIO-B 508 SF 548 SF 7 8 7 22 ..STUDIO-C 528 SF 570 SF 1 0 0 1 ..STUDIO-D 509 SF 550 SF 2 2 2 6 ..STUDIO-E 507 SF 550 SF 0 1 1 2 .ALCOVE-B 575 SF 620 SF 4 4 4 12 1 BR-A 675 SF 724 SF 1 1 0 2 1 BR-B 674 SF 724 SF 7 7 8 22 1 BR-D 776 SF 832 SF 0 1 1 2 2 BR-A 1059 SF 1130 SF 0 0 1 1 2 BR-B 982 SF 1033 SF 2 2 2 6 2 BR-C 1057 SF 1130 SF 4 4 3 11 2 BR-F 960 SF 1015 SF 2 2 0 4 2 BR-G 934 SF 989 SF 0 0 2 2 BLDG B 31 32 32 95 ..STUDIO-A 508 SF 548 SF 0 1 1 2 ..STUDIO-B 548 SF 8 7 7 22 ..STUDIO-C 528 SF 570 SF 1 0 0 1 ..STUDIO-D 509 SF 550 SF 2 2 2 6 ..STUDIO-E 507 SF 550 SF 0 1 1 2 .ALCOVE-B 575 SF 620 SF 4 4 4 12 1 BR-A 675 SF 724 SF 0 1 1 2 1 BR-B 674 SF 724 SF 8 7 7 22 1 BR-D 832 SF 0 1 1 2 2 BR-A 1059 SF 1130 SF 1 0 0 1 2 BR-B 982 SF 1033 SF 2 2 2 6 2 BR-C 1057 SF 1130 SF 3 4 4 11 2 BR-F 960 SF 1015 SF 2 2 0 4 2 BR-G 934 SF 989 SF 0 0 2 2 BLDG C 31 32 32 95 90 96 98 284 PROJECT TOTALS BIKE RACK INTERIOR COUNT BLDG_A SUBLEVEL 71 BLDG_B SUBLEVEL 65 BLDG_C SUBLEVEL 65 GRAND TOTAL 201 BIKE RACK TOTALS BIKE RACK EXTERIOR COUNT BUILDING A 6 BUILDING B 6 BUILDING C 6 GRAND TOTAL 18 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 101 102103104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 100+00.00113+31.791230+00.00 3+31.10 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 18TH AVENUE SOUTH 67TH STREET EAST17TH AVENUE SOUTH FENCED IN DOG RUN AREA EXISTING APARTMENT BUILDING EXISTING APARTMENT BUILDING EXISTING APARTMENT BUILDING EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE 17TH AVENUE SOUTH 18TH AVENUE SOUTH 26 TOTAL SURFACE LOT PARKING STALLS 2 HANDICAP PARKING LOT 2 STREET PARKING BUILDING A 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING B 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL SWIMMING POOLGAS FIRE PIT 5' TALL ALUMINUM FENCE ALUMINUM AND WOOD TRELLIS COURTYARD SHED BUILDING C 3-STORY RESIDENTIAL STREET PARKING RETAINING WALLS TRENCH DRAIN RAMP DN RETAINING WALLS TRENCH DRAIN RAMP DN RETAINING WALLS TRENCH DRAIN RAMP DN BUILDING ENTRY CANOPY ABOVE RAMP 2' RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALLS PLANTER RAMP BUILDING ENTRY SIDEWALK / BIKE PATH UNIT PORCH ACCESS STAIR EGRESS UNIT PORCH ACCESS STAIR EGRESS UNIT PORCH ACCESS UNIT PORCH ACCESS PLANTER RETAINING WALLS PLANTER RAMP BUILDING ENTRY PLANTER TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER UNIT PATIO UNIT PATIO BALCONIES ABOVE PROPOSED 35' REAR SETBACK PROPOSED 10' FRONT SETBACK 35' - 0"40' - 0" 4' EGRESS SIDWALK 4' EGRESS SIDWALK 8' - 0" PROPOSED 8' PARKING LOT SETBACK 8' - 0" PROPOSED 8' FRONT SETBACK15' - 0"PROPOSED 15' FRONT SETBACK STORMWATER RETENTION POND FENCED PLAYGROUND ONE WAY -PRIVATE DRIVE EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN PRIVATE DRIVE PARKING LOT 1 27 TOTAL SURFACE LOT PARKING STALLS 1 HANDICAP15' - 0"25' - 0" 25' - 0" PROPOSED 25' FRONT SETBACK UNIT PATIO BALCONIES ABOVEBALCONIES ABOVE DROP-OFF ZONEMONUMENT SIGN SEE AL102 MONUMENT SIGN SEE AL102 **HATCHED AREA PART OF SEPARATE ROOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. PROPOSED SETBACK 10' FRONT SETBACK PRPOSED 8' FRONT SETBACK 18T H A V E S SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE P R O P E R T Y L IN E PR O P E R TY LIN E PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPRIVATE SIDWALK 4' EGRESS SIDWALK 4' EGRESS SIDWALK EGRESS RAMP 1:20 MAX SLOPE RAMPEGRESS RAMP 1:20 MAX SLOPE (4) GAS GRILLS 6 BIKE SPACES 6 BIKE SPACES 6 BIKE SPACES10' - 0"10' - 0"PROPOSED 15' FRONT SETBACK PROPOSED 25' SIDE SETBACK PROPOSED 40' SIDE SETBACK PROPOSED ADDRESS: 6700 RICHFIELD PARKWAY PROPOSED ADDRESS: 6701 RICHFIELD PARKWAY PROPOSED ADDRESS: 6630 RICHFIELD PARKWAY NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE TRANSFORMER PARKING LOT 2ALUMINUM AND WOOD TRELLIS © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:39:35 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS SB ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AL101The ChamberlainApartments 1" = 30'-0"AL101 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN1 NORTH A.A302 2 A.A301 4 A602 2 A602 1 A602 6 A602 4 2 AL103 3 AL104 AL104 21 42" DEEP -POOL / HOT TUB: PROVIDE HOT TUB WATER PUMPS AND BOILER SIZING TO ACCOMODATE COOL OR HOT WATER TEMPERATURES AL104 82' - 0"19' - 10"4' - 7"4' - 7"13' - 7"8' - 8"10' - 0"10' - 0"8" 1 AL105 10 AL104 2 AL105 1' - 4"20' - 0"11' - 10"4' - 4"11' - 10" ADA TRANSFER WALL ALUMINUM TRELLIS ABOVE GATE: PROVIDE PADLOCK HARDWARE1' - 0"1' - 0"1' - 0"FOLDING SUN SHADE ALUMINUM TRELLIS ABOVE"FARM" TABLEWOOD BENCHESBUILT-INGAS GRILLBUILT-INGAS GRILLBUILT-INGAS GRILLBUILT-INGAS GRILLGAS FIRE PIT: 36" "MISO" by PALOFORM EMERGENCY GAS SHUT-OFF FOR FIRE PIT PLANTER BOXES PLANTER BOXESWOOD BENCHES20' - 4"GATE: PROXIMITY READER GATE: EGRESS HARDWARE REQUIRED. SEE AL107 FOR GATE ELEVATION. GATE: PROXIMITY READER GATE: EGRESS HARDWARE REQUIRED. SEE AL107 FOR GATE ELEVATION AND SECURITY SCREENING 1' ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE PATIO: CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE 5' SQUARE JOINT PATTERN PATIO: JOINT PATTERN ORIGIN RIVER ROCK GROUND COVER R 7' - 0 " 4' - 6"8' - 0"4' - 6"16' - 5 31/32"3' - 9 1/4"12' - 11 7/32"15' - 3"6' - 6"32' - 8"PLANTER 7' - 9" A6028 PLANTER BED PLANTER 7' - 9"PLANTER4' - 3"5' FENCE - TYPE "B" 5' FENCE - TYPE "A" 5' FENCE - TYPE "B" 5' FENCE - TYPE "B" SEASONAL STORAGE A192 POOL EQUIPMENT A191 POOL CHEMICAL STORAGE CLOSET POOL BOILER POOL PUMPS 15' - 0"19' - 9"17' - 4"EGRESS PATH5' - 0"10' - 2"19' - 2"18' - 8"5' - 5" EXERCISE A147 COMMON A141 GROUP FITNESS A146 2 BR-D A122 COMMON A141 CLUB ROOM A143 2 BR-B A132 STAIR A-B A152 2 BR-C A134 BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" AB AC AD AE AF AG AL104 3 AL104 4 90 SF POOL EQUIPMENT A191 130 SF SEASONAL STORAGE A192 AL105 2 POOL UTILITY ROUTE 9' - 0"19' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 4"© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:39:43 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS SB ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - EXTERIOR AMENITY AL103The ChamberlainApartments 1/4" = 1'-0"AL103 BLDG A - COURTYARD OVERALL PLAN1 1/4" = 1'-0"AL103 AMENITY COURTYARD SECTION2 NORTH DG-1 DG-2 DOG RUN: PROVIDE 4" DEEP PEA GRAVEL SURFACE 5' TALL ALUMINUM FENCE 5' TALL SECURITY GATES 5' EGRESS PATH RAMP UP TO COURTYARD FENCE: TYPE C 55' - 0"20' - 0"5' - 0"6' - 0"45' - 0"50' - 0"PLAY AREA: PROVIDE PLAY SAFE SURFACE, 6' CLEARANCE AROUND PLAY STRUCTURE OR AS REQUIRED. 5' FENCE: TYPE C PROVIDE DRINKING FOUNTAIN PROVIDE PARK BENCH LATCHED GATE WITH PROXIMITY READER LATCHED GATE WITH PROXIMITY READER GARDEN PLOTS RAISED BED PLANTERS 5' ALUMINUM FENCEW/ FINE METAL MESH SCREENING UP 2' ABOVE GROUNDPROVIDE EXTERIOR HOSE BIB FENCE TYPE D 52' - 4"FENCE TYPE D69' - 4"TYPE B POOL FENCE BLACK ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE - TYP. PICKET SPACING 4" O.C. DOUBLE SIDED "TRESPA" 7" FLUSH SIDING RIPPED INTO 2.5" & 4.5" WIDTHS. ATTACHED TO 1.5" ALUMINUM FENCE PICKETS 2' O.C.TYP 2' - 0"5' - 0"TYPE A FIRE PIT FENCE 5' - 0"TYPE C DOG RUN & PLAYGROUND FENCE BLACK ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE - TYP. PICKET SPACING 4" O.C.5' - 0"6" CONCRETE CURB EGRESS GATE WITH PANIC HARDWARE PROVIDE SECURITY SCREENING OR SOLID PANEL TO PREVENT ACCESS TO LATCH HARDWARE (SHOWN HATCHED) 1' - 6 1/2"GATEBAC TYPE D GARDEN FENCE BLACK ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE - TYP. PICKET SPACING 4" O.C.4' - 6"1/2" WIRE MESH SCREEN UP TO 2' ABOVE GRADESCREEN2' - 0"6"4' - 6"(2) SLIDING PIN GATE LATCHES VARIED-EXPOSURE CEDAR- WRAPPED TRASH ENCLOSURE (1x2, 1x4, 1x6); NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY AT DOORS HEAVY-DUTY HINGES (3) EA SIDE 3 x 3 STEEL TUBE COLUMNS AT GATE SUPPORTS VARIED-EXPOSURE CEDAR- WRAPPED TRASH ENCLOSURE (1x2, 1x4, 1x6) 4 x 4 TREATED WDOD POSTS TYPICAL © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:39:46 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS SB ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - EXTERIOR AMENITY AL107The ChamberlainApartments 3/16" = 1'-0"AL107 SITE PLAN - DOG RUN1 3/16" = 1'-0"AL107 SITE PLAN - PLAY AREA2 3/16" = 1'-0"AL107 SITE PLAN - GARDEN PLOTS3 1/2" = 1'-0" SITE FENCE TYPE NORTHNORTHNORTH 1/2" = 1'-0"AL107 TRASH ENCLOSURE - FRONT4 1/2" = 1'-0"AL107 TRASH ENCLOSURE - SIDE5 A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 AB AA AC AD A9.1A10 A8.5A11 AE AF AG AH 28' - 6"28' - 6"8' - 4" 4' - 4 7/8" 15' - 9 1/8"6"28' - 0"4' - 2 1/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6" 2' - 5 1/2" 16' - 6 1/2"4' - 1 1/2" AJ A12 11' - 2 1/4" 9' - 5 3/4" 19' - 0 1/4"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"2' - 0"16' - 0"4' - 8" 10' - 0 1/8" A13A14 4' - 5"16' - 3"1' - 0"28' - 0"1' - 0"16' - 3"4' - 5"6' - 3"4' - 5"17' - 3"28' - 0"17' - 3"10' - 8"30' - 10"28' - 6"6' - 11 1/8"20' - 8"10 7/8"27' - 4 1/8"1' - 9"20' - 8"381 SF TRASH 148 SF STAIR A-B 493 SF WATER 143 SF ELEV. MECH. 128 SF PET WASH 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.DRIVE24' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0" TYP. DRIVE 24' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.24' - 0" DRIVE18' - 0" TYP.9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0" A.A302 3 Sim A.A3012Sim A.A302 4 Sim A.A302 1 SimA.A301 4 Sim A.A302 2 SimA.A301 3 Sim A.A3011Sim 147' - 10 1/4"147' - 10 1/8"208' - 1 5/8"71' - 4"275' - 5 5/8"147' - 10 1/8"76' - 6 1/4"71' - 4"215' - 2 1/8"BIKE FIX-IT STATION GENERAL NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WOOD AND STEEL STUD WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 3. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS NOTED BY THE SYMBOL INDICATING CENTERLINE OF WALL 2. DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 4. EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 10. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS TYPE A16. MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 15. DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR CMU WALLS ARE TO FACE OF CMU 12. 17. NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT REFER TO INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FLOOR FINISH KEY 13.PROVIDE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS IN RETURN PLENUMS (WALLS ON SOFFIT) 5.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE K3,K6, AND K8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 7.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE V4,V6, AND V8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE B6 AND B8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6. 8.RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE W6 AND W8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS ARE FIRE TREATED 2x8's UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 9. EXTEND 1-HR FIRE BARRIERS TO UNDERSIDE OF SHEATHING WHERE APPLICABLE 11. 14.PROVIDE PROTECTION AROUND ALL PIPING THROUGHOUT GARAGE AS REQUIRED; COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:38:52 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS/NR/SB/GJ SB SUBLEVEL PLAN - BUILDING A - OVERALL A.A000.0The ChamberlainApartments 1" = 20'-0"A.A000.0 SUBLEVEL PLAN - BUILDING A - OVERALL1 NORTH1 A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 AB AA AC AD A9.1A10 A8.5A11 AE AF AG AH AJ A12A13A14 28' - 6"28' - 6"8' - 8 5/8" 4' - 0 1/4" 15' - 9 1/8"1 3/8"28' - 4 5/8"4' - 2 1/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6" 2' - 10 1/8" 16' - 1 7/8"3' - 8 7/8"4' - 0 3/8"17' - 3"28' - 0"17' - 3"10' - 8"30' - 10"28' - 6"7' - 3 3/4"19' - 10 3/4"1' - 3 1/2"27' - 4 1/8"2' - 1 5/8"19' - 10 3/4"10' - 9 5/8"9' - 1 1/8"19' - 4 7/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"18' - 0"4' - 3 3/8" 274' - 8 3/8"70' - 6 3/4"147' - 10 1/8"147' - 1"214' - 4 7/8"4' - 0 3/8"15' - 10 3/8"1' - 4 5/8"28' - 0"1' - 4 5/8"15' - 10 3/8"4' - 0 3/8"508 SF ..STUDIO-B 706 SF .ALCOVE-E 959 SF 2 BR-F 979 SF 2 BR-B 753 SF EXERCISE 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1106 SF 2 BR-D 675 SF 1 BR-A 979 SF 2 BR-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 979 SF 2 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1106 SF 2 BR-D 508 SF ..STUDIO-A 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 959 SF 2 BR-F 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 343 SF ...MICRO-B 2235 SF COMMON 391 SF GROUP FITNESS 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 2235 SF COMMON 142 SF CONF. ROOM 299 SF OFFICE 208' - 1 5/8"70' - 6 3/4"PROPERTY LINE 736 SF CLUB ROOM 167 SF OFFICE 140 SF STORAGE 348 SF MAIL 130 SF VESTIBULE 130 SF SEASONAL STORAGE 90 SF POOL EQUIPMENT A.A302 4 Sim A.A3012Sim A.A302 3 Sim A.A3011SimA.A301 3 Sim A.A302 2 SimA.A301 4 Sim A.A302 1 Sim76' - 4 1/4"147' - 10 1/8"6 BIKE SPACES 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0"DRIVE24' - 0"18' - 0"4' - 0"DRIVE20' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"18' - 0" DRIVE 24' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"COMPACT 16' - 0" DRIVE 16' - 0" A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 AB AA AC AD A9.1A10 A8.5A11 AE AF AG AH AJ A12A13A14 28' - 6"28' - 6"8' - 8 5/8" 4' - 0 1/4" 15' - 9 1/8"1 3/8"28' - 4 5/8"4' - 2 1/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6" 2' - 10 1/8" 16' - 1 7/8"3' - 8 7/8"17' - 3"28' - 0"17' - 3"10' - 8"30' - 10"28' - 6"7' - 3 3/4"19' - 10 3/4"1' - 3 1/2"27' - 4 1/8"2' - 1 5/8"19' - 10 3/4"10' - 9 5/8" 9' - 1 1/8" 19' - 4 7/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6" 2' - 4 5/8" 15' - 7 3/8"4' - 3 3/8"4' - 0 3/8"15' - 10 3/8"1' - 4 5/8"28' - 0"1' - 4 5/8"15' - 10 3/8"4' - 0 3/8"508 SF ..STUDIO-B 706 SF .ALCOVE-E 959 SF 2 BR-F 979 SF 2 BR-B 979 SF 2 BR-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1106 SF 2 BR-D 674 SF 1 BR-B979 SF 2 BR-B1057 SF 2 BR-C 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 979 SF 2 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1059 SF 2 BR-A 1106 SF 2 BR-D 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 959 SF 2 BR-F 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-A 877 SF 1 BR-C 1062 SF 2 BR-E 189 SF ELEC 745 SF CORRIDOR 122 SF ELEVATOR LOBBY 674 SF 1 BR-B 1316 SF 3 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1644 SF COMMON 351' - 2 5/8"70' - 6 3/4"147' - 10 1/8"147' - 1"214' - 4 7/8"OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 208' - 1 5/8" A.A3011Sim A.A302 3 Sim A.A3012Sim A.A302 4 Sim A.A302 1 SimA.A301 4 Sim A.A302 2 SimA.A301 3 Sim 70' - 6 3/4"80' - 6 3/8"147' - 10 1/8"GENERAL NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WOOD AND STEEL STUD WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 3. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS NOTED BY THE SYMBOL INDICATING CENTERLINE OF WALL 2. DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 4. EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 10. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS TYPE A16. MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 15. DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR CMU WALLS ARE TO FACE OF CMU 12. 17. NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT REFER TO INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FLOOR FINISH KEY 13.PROVIDE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS IN RETURN PLENUMS (WALLS ON SOFFIT) 5.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE K3,K6, AND K8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 7.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE V4,V6, AND V8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE B6 AND B8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6. 8.RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE W6 AND W8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS ARE FIRE TREATED 2x8's UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 9. EXTEND 1-HR FIRE BARRIERS TO UNDERSIDE OF SHEATHING WHERE APPLICABLE 11. 14.PROVIDE PROTECTION AROUND ALL PIPING THROUGHOUT GARAGE AS REQUIRED; COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:38:56 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS/NR/SB/GJ SB LEVEL 1 + LEVEL 2 PLANS - BUILDING A - OVERALL A.A000.1The ChamberlainApartments 1" = 20'-0"A.A000.1 LEVEL 1 - BUILDING A - OVERALL1 1" = 20'-0"A.A000.1 LEVEL 2 & LEVEL 3 - BUILDING A - OVERALL2 NORTHNORTH A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 AB AA AC AD A9.1A10 A8.5A11 AE AF AG AH AJ A12A13A14 5/12 5/12 5/12 5/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/12 5/12 5/12 5/12 5/125/125/125/125/12A.A301 3 Sim A.A3011Sim A.A302 3 Sim A.A3012Sim A.A302 4 Sim A.A302 1 SimA.A301 4 Sim A.A302 2 SimGENERAL NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WOOD AND STEEL STUD WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 3. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS NOTED BY THE SYMBOL INDICATING CENTERLINE OF WALL 2. DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 4. EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 10. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS TYPE A16. MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 15. DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR CMU WALLS ARE TO FACE OF CMU 12. 17. NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT REFER TO INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FLOOR FINISH KEY 13.PROVIDE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS IN RETURN PLENUMS (WALLS ON SOFFIT) 5.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE K3,K6, AND K8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 7.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE V4,V6, AND V8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE B6 AND B8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6. 8.RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE W6 AND W8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS ARE FIRE TREATED 2x8's UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 9. EXTEND 1-HR FIRE BARRIERS TO UNDERSIDE OF SHEATHING WHERE APPLICABLE 11. 14.PROVIDE PROTECTION AROUND ALL PIPING THROUGHOUT GARAGE AS REQUIRED; COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A9 AB AA AC AD A9.1A10 A8.5A11 AE AF AG AH AJ A12A13A14 28' - 6"28' - 6"8' - 8 5/8" 4' - 0 1/4" 15' - 9 1/8"1 3/8"28' - 4 5/8"4' - 2 1/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6" 2' - 10 1/8" 16' - 1 7/8"3' - 8 7/8"4' - 0 3/8"17' - 3"28' - 0"17' - 3"10' - 8"30' - 10"28' - 6"7' - 3 3/4"19' - 10 3/4"1' - 3 1/2"27' - 4 1/8"2' - 1 5/8"19' - 10 3/4"10' - 9 5/8" 9' - 1 1/8" 19' - 4 7/8"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"2' - 4 5/8" 15' - 7 3/8" 4' - 3 3/8"10' - 4 3/4"4' - 0 3/8"15' - 10 3/8"1' - 4 5/8"28' - 0"1' - 4 5/8"15' - 10 3/8"4' - 0 3/8"508 SF ..STUDIO-B 706 SF .ALCOVE-E 932 SF 2 BR-G 979 SF 2 BR-B 979 SF 2 BR-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1106 SF 2 BR-D 675 SF 1 BR-A979 SF 2 BR-B1057 SF 2 BR-C 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 979 SF 2 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 1106 SF 2 BR-D 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 932 SF 2 BR-G508 SF ..STUDIO-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 877 SF 1 BR-C 1062 SF 2 BR-E 189 SF ELEC 2458 SF CORRIDOR 122 SF ELEVATOR LOBBY 674 SF 1 BR-B 1316 SF 3 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 764 SF .ALCOVE-C 274' - 8 3/8"70' - 6 3/4"147' - 6 3/4"147' - 1"214' - 4 7/8"208' - 1 5/8" 681 SF .ALCOVE-D A.A302 4 Sim A.A302 1 SimA.A301 4 Sim A.A302 2 SimA.A301 3 Sim A.A3011Sim A.A302 3 Sim A.A3012Sim 70' - 6 3/4"80' - 6 3/8"147' - 10 1/8"© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:38:58 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS/NR/SB/GJ SB LEVEL 3 + ROOF PLAN - BUILDING A - OVERALL A.A000.2The ChamberlainApartments 1" = 20'-0"A.A000.2 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING A - OVERALL2 NORTHNORTH 1" = 20'-0"A.A000.2 LEVEL 3 PLAN - BUILDING A - OVERALL1 B.A301 1 B16 B1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15 BA BB BC BD 536 SF LOBBY 78 SF COMM 1057 SF 2 BR-C 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-A 982 SF 2 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 528 SF ..STUDIO-C 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 982 SF 2 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 675 SF 1 BR-A 960 SF 2 BR-F 674 SF 1 BR-B508 SF ..STUDIO-B 105 SF TRASH 426' - 6 3/4" 1' - 3 3/8"26' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"23' - 1 1/2"5' - 4 1/2"28' - 6"5' - 4 1/2"23' - 1 1/2"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"8' - 1 5/8"18' - 7 3/8"1' - 3 3/8"16' - 7"18' - 0"10' - 0"16' - 7"70' - 6 3/4"B.A301 2 4' - 8 3/8"4' - 8 3/8"PROPERTY LINE6 BIKE SPACES B.A302 1 Sim B.A302 2 Sim B.A3013SimB.A302 3 SimB16 B1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15 BA BB BC BD 388 SF TRASH 24703 SF GARAGE 179 SF ELECTRICAL 181 SF STAIR B-B 173 SF STAIR B-A 61 SF ELEV. LOBBY 1' - 8"19' - 0"7' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"7' - 9"19' - 0"1' - 8"16' - 7"18' - 0"10' - 0"16' - 7"235 SF WATER ROOM 88 SF PET WASH 183 SF ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.DRIVE24' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.BIKE FIX-IT STATION 427' - 4" B.A301 1 B16 B1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15 BA BB BC BD 70 SF MECH 1057 SF 2 BR-C 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 675 SF 1 BR-A 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 982 SF 2 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 776 SF 1 BR-D 507 SF ..STUDIO-E 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 982 SF 2 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 674 SF 1 BR-B508 SF ..STUDIO-B 111 SF TRASH 211 SF STAIR B-B 211 SF STAIR B-A 69 SF ELEV LOBBY 426' - 6 3/4" 26' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"57' - 0"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"26' - 9"16' - 7"18' - 0"10' - 0"16' - 7"70' - 6 3/4"B.A301 2 1' - 3 3/8"1' - 3 3/8"4' - 8 3/8"4' - 8 3/8"B.A302 3 SimB.A302 1 Sim B.A302 2 Sim B.A3013SimB.A301 1 B16 B1B2B3B4B5B6B7B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15 BA BB BC BD B.A301 2 5/12 5/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/12ELEVATOR OVERRUN B.A302 2 Sim B.A302 3 SimB.A302 1 Sim B.A3013Sim GENERAL NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WOOD AND STEEL STUD WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 3. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS NOTED BY THE SYMBOL INDICATING CENTERLINE OF WALL 2. DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 4. EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 10. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS TYPE A16. MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 15. DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR CMU WALLS ARE TO FACE OF CMU 12. 17. NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT REFER TO INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FLOOR FINISH KEY 13.PROVIDE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS IN RETURN PLENUMS (WALLS ON SOFFIT) 5.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE K3,K6, AND K8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 7.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE V4,V6, AND V8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE B6 AND B8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6. 8.RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE W6 AND W8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS ARE FIRE TREATED 2x8's UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 9. EXTEND 1-HR FIRE BARRIERS TO UNDERSIDE OF SHEATHING WHERE APPLICABLE 11. 14.PROVIDE PROTECTION AROUND ALL PIPING THROUGHOUT GARAGE AS REQUIRED; COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:39:51 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS/NR/SB SB PLANS - BUILDING B - OVERALLS B.A000.0The ChamberlainApartmentsKEYPLAN 1" = 20'-0"B.A000.0 LEVEL 1 PLAN - BUILDING B - OVERALL2 1" = 20'-0"B.A000.0 SUBLEVEL PLAN - BUILDING B - OVERALL1 1" = 20'-0"B.A000.0 LEVEL 2 & LEVEL 3 - BUILDING B - OVERALL3 1" = 20'-0"B.A000.0 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING B - OVERALL4 NORTHNORTHNORTHNORTH C16 C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15 CA CB CC CD16' - 7"28' - 0"16' - 7"26' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"26' - 9"16' - 7"28' - 0"16' - 7"26' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"26' - 9" 427' - 4" 24737 SF GARAGE 387 SF TRASH 61 SF ELEVATOR LOBBY 179 SF ELECTRICAL 150 SF STAIR C-B 173 SF STAIR C-A ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 1' - 8"1' - 8" WATER ROOM 94 SF PET WASH 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0" 9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.DRIVE24' - 0"18' - 0" TYP.BIKE FIX-IT STATION C16 C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15 CA CB CC CD16' - 7"28' - 0"16' - 7"26' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"26' - 9" 1059 SF 2 BR-A 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 674 SF 1 BR-B 510 SF ..STUDIO-B 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 982 SF 2 BR-B 528 SF ..STUDIO-C 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 674 SF 1 BR-B508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 982 SF 2 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 536 SF LOBBY 145 SF VESTIBULE 2013 SF CORRIDOR 1' - 3 3/8"1' - 3 3/8" 426' - 6 3/4"4' - 8 3/8"4' - 8 3/8"70' - 6 3/4"10' - 0 5/8"6 BIKE SPACES C.A302 3 SimC.A301 1 Sim C.A301 2 Sim C.A3013Sim C.A302 1 Sim C.A302 2 Sim C16 C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15 CA CB CC CD 1057 SF 2 BR-C 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 1057 SF 2 BR-C 674 SF 1 BR-B 510 SF ..STUDIO-B 575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 675 SF 1 BR-A 982 SF 2 BR-B 69 SF ELEV. LOBBY 507 SF ..STUDIO-E 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 509 SF ..STUDIO-D 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-A 1057 SF 2 BR-C575 SF .ALCOVE-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 960 SF 2 BR-F 674 SF 1 BR-B508 SF ..STUDIO-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 982 SF 2 BR-B 674 SF 1 BR-B 508 SF ..STUDIO-B 773 SF 1 BR-D 70 SF MECH 16' - 7"28' - 0"16' - 7"26' - 9"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"28' - 6"26' - 9"1' - 3 3/8"1' - 3 3/8" 426' - 6 3/4"4' - 8 3/8"4' - 8 3/8"70' - 6 3/4"C.A302 3 SimC.A301 1 Sim C.A301 2 Sim C.A3013Sim C.A302 2 Sim C.A301 1 Sim C16 C1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15 CA CB CC CD5/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/125/12 5/12 5/125/12C.A302 3 SimC.A301 1 Sim C.A301 2 Sim C.A3013Sim C.A302 2 Sim C.A302 1 Sim GENERAL NOTES: 1.DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WOOD AND STEEL STUD WALLS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF SHEATHING 3. DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL UNLESS NOTED BY THE SYMBOL INDICATING CENTERLINE OF WALL 2. DIMENSIONS AT UNIT DEMISING ARE TO CENTERLINE OF WALLS 4. EXTEND ALL SHAFTS TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF SHEATHING OR TOP OF ROOF PENETRATIONS WHERE APPLICABLE 10. ALL UNITS ARE TYPE B ACCESSIBLE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED AS TYPE A16. MAINTAIN 8'-2" MIN. AND 8'-6" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT AT PARKING AREAS INDICATED ON PLANS, ALL OTHER PARKING AREAS SHALL PROVIDE 7'-2" MIN. CLEAR HEIGHT 15. DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR CMU WALLS ARE TO FACE OF CMU 12. 17. NO PENETRATIONS OR OPENINGS ALLOWED IN SHAFT WALLS UNLESS THEY EXPRESSLY SERVE THE SHAFT REFER TO INTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FLOOR FINISH KEY 13.PROVIDE NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS IN RETURN PLENUMS (WALLS ON SOFFIT) 5.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE K3,K6, AND K8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 7.RESIDENTIAL DISMISSING WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE V4,V6, AND V8 1- HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS BELOW LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE B6 AND B8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING 6. 8.RESIDENTIAL CORRIDOR WALLS ABOVE LEVEL 2 ARE TYPE W6 AND W8 1-HR FIRE RATING WITH ACOUSTIC RATING EXTERIOR WOOD STUDS ARE FIRE TREATED 2x8's UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 9. EXTEND 1-HR FIRE BARRIERS TO UNDERSIDE OF SHEATHING WHERE APPLICABLE 11. 14.PROVIDE PROTECTION AROUND ALL PIPING THROUGHOUT GARAGE AS REQUIRED; COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:40:20 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING JS/NR/SB SB PLANS - BUILDING C - OVERALLS C.A000.0The ChamberlainApartments 1" = 20'-0"C.A000.0 SUBLEVEL PLAN - BUILDING C - OVERALL1 1" = 20'-0"C.A000.0 LEVEL 1 PLAN - BUILDING C - OVERALL2 1" = 20'-0"C.A000.0 LEVEL 2 & LEVEL 3 - BUILDING C - OVERALL3 1" = 20'-0"C.A000.0 ROOF PLAN - BUILDING C - OVERALL4 NORTHNORTHNORTHNORTH BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" AB AAACAD E12 E08 E01 E2A E5A E08 E01 E12 E01 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A E43 E43 AREAWAY: FOR GARAGE VENTILATION 3' - 7 7/16"3' - 7 7/16" E43 BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A9.1 A10A8.5 A11 E08E2AE2BE2BE12E2AE08E5AE5AE2AE08 E2A E2B E2A E2B E2A E2BE01E01 E01 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A E43 E43 E43 E43 E43E43E43E43 2"1' - 7 7/8" 2' - 9 5/8"2' - 0 5/8"2' - 0 5/8"2' - 9 5/8"3' - 6 1/4"3' - 6 1/4"2' - 9 5/8"2' - 9 5/8"2' - 3 1/2"2' - 3 1/2"3' - 7 1/2"3' - 7 1/2"2' - 9 5/8"2' - 9 5/8"3' - 5 1/2"3' - 5 1/2"2' - 9 5/8"2' - 10 5/8"2' - 10 5/8"2' - 9 5/8" E09E5A BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" ACADAEAFAGAHAJ E08 E01 E5AE2B E2A E5A E08 E08E2A E5A E12E01 E01 E12 E01E08 E12E08E08 E2A E08E01 E01 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2B 1B1B E43 E43 E43 9' - 1 1/8"2' - 2 9/16"2' - 0 7/16"3' - 10 1/2" BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 E2A E10 E2AE08E5A E08 E5A E2BE01 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A E43 E43 3' - 7 3/8"1' - 3 1/4"3' - 5 11/16"AVERAGE GRADE TO MIDPOINT OF ROOF38' - 0"GENERAL NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPEC EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR MATERIAL DETAILS 2.GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDINGS, COORDINATE EXTENTS OF ROCK FACED BLOCK, SMOOTH FACED COLORED BLOCK, AND FOUNDATION BLOCK WITH GRADING PLAN; REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING INFORMATION KEYNOTES:© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:39:14 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING /GJ SB ELEVATIONS - BUILDING A A.A301The ChamberlainApartments 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A301 BLDG A - NORTH ELEVATION AREA 21 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A301 BLDG A - WEST ELEVATION AREA 23 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A301 BLDG A - NORTH ELEVATION AREA 12 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A301 BLDG A - WEST ELEVATION AREA 14 E01 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK-FACE CMU E2A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "1" E2B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "2" E3A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "3" E3B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "4" E4A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "5" E4B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "6" E5A 5/4" x 5-1/2" CEMENTITIOUS TRIM - PREFINISHED COLOR "TBD" E08 MULTI EXPOSURE CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - COLOR "TBD" E09 ASPHALT SHINGLES E10 ALUMINUM BALCONY - 5' x 10' TYP. E12 CULTURED STONE VENEER E13 PRECAST CONCRETE SILL E20 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LOUVER E43 6" PREFINISHED METAL RAIN GUTTER AND LEADER BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" ABAA AC AD AE AF AG E2B E01 E10 E5A E08 E2A E08 E12 E08 E10E01 E2A E10 E2A E12E13 E10 E08 E2AE12 E5A E2A E08 E01 8' - 11 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 1' - 8 5/8" E43 E43 E43 E43 3' - 8 13/16"1' - 6 3/4"1' - 6 3/4"1' - 8 1/4"1' - 8 1/4"1' - 8 1/2"1' - 8 1/2"3' - 1 1/4" E43 BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A SUBLEVEL 837' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" AG AH AJ E2B E01 E5A E08 E2A E01E08 E2B E01 E08 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"11' - 0"2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A E43 E43 E43 12' - 0"6' - 0"BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" A9A9.1A10 A8.5A11A12A13A14 E2B E10 E08 E2A E5A E01 E08 E10 E2A E5A E08 E2A E5A E01E08 E2B E01 E10 E5A E08 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2' - 2 1/2"3' - 5 1/2" E43 E43 E43E43 2' - 9"2' - 2 1/2"2' - 5 1/2"3' - 5 1/2" BLDG_A LEVEL 1 848' - 0" BLDG_A LEVEL 2 858' - 5 7/8" BLDG_A LEVEL 3 868' - 11 3/4" BLDG_A ROOF 878' - 0 7/8" A1A2A3A4A5A6A7A8A8.5 E2A E01E08E2A E2B E2A E08 E10E08 E2A E01E08 E2B E10 E2A E2A E10E12E01 E08 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A E43 E43 E43 E43 E43 2' - 10 3/8"3' - 6 1/4"3' - 6 1/4"2' - 9 5/8"2' - 9 5/8"3' - 7"3' - 7"2' - 3 1/8"2' - 3 7/8"2' - 9 5/8"2' - 9 5/8"3' - 6 1/4"3' - 6 1/4"4' - 3 3/4"4' - 3 3/4" E09 KEYNOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPEC EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR MATERIAL DETAILS 2.GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDINGS, COORDINATE EXTENTS OF ROCK FACED BLOCK, SMOOTH FACED COLORED BLOCK, AND FOUNDATION BLOCK WITH GRADING PLAN; REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING INFORMATION © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:39:28 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING GJ SB ELEVATIONS - BUILDING A A.A302The ChamberlainApartments 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A302 BLDG A - SOUTH ELEVATION AREA 22 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A302 BLDG A - SOUTH ELEVATION AREA 11 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A302 BLDG A - EAST ELEVATION AREA 14 1/8" = 1'-0"A.A302 BLDG A - EAST ELEVATION AREA 23 E01 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK-FACE CMU E2A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "1" E2B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "2" E3A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "3" E3B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "4" E4A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "5" E4B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "6" E5A 5/4" x 5-1/2" CEMENTITIOUS TRIM - PREFINISHED COLOR "TBD" E08 MULTI EXPOSURE CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - COLOR "TBD" E09 ASPHALT SHINGLES E10 ALUMINUM BALCONY - 5' x 10' TYP. E12 CULTURED STONE VENEER E13 PRECAST CONCRETE SILL E20 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LOUVER E43 6" PREFINISHED METAL RAIN GUTTER AND LEADER BLDG_B LEVEL 1 850' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 2 860' - 5 7/8" BLDG_B LEVEL 3 870' - 11 3/4" BLDG_B ROOF 880' - 0 7/8" B16 B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15 E3BE10E09E08E01 E3A E5A E01 E10 E3A E5AE09 E01E10E5A E5AE10E09 E12 E01E09 E08E12 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 2A2A2A 3A2A2A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3' - 7"3' - 7"1' - 9"4' - 0"3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6"3' - 1" E43 E43 E43 E43 E43E43E43 BLDG_B LEVEL 1 850' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 2 860' - 5 7/8" BLDG_B SUBLEVEL 839' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 3 870' - 11 3/4" BLDG_B ROOF 880' - 0 7/8" BABBBCBD E3B E08E09 E01 E3A E5A E08E09 E01 E3B E08 E01E09 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"11' - 0"3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3' - 9"3' - 9" E43 E43E43 BLDG_B LEVEL 1 850' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 2 860' - 5 7/8" BLDG_B LEVEL 3 870' - 11 3/4" BLDG_B ROOF 880' - 0 7/8" B1B2B3B4B5B6B7 E3A E5A E01E09 E10 E3A E08 E5A E10 E5A E08 E5A E09 E3A E08 E5AE10 E10E3BE09 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 2' - 10 7/8"3' - 9 1/2"2' - 9 5/8"3' - 9 1/2"4' - 0"1' - 9"3' - 7"3' - 7" E43 E43 E43E20 E43E43 E43 AVERAGE GRADE TO MIDPOINT OF ROOF40' - 0"E43E43 GENERAL NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPEC EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR MATERIAL DETAILS 2.GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDINGS, COORDINATE EXTENTS OF ROCK FACED BLOCK, SMOOTH FACED COLORED BLOCK, AND FOUNDATION BLOCK WITH GRADING PLAN; REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING INFORMATION KEYNOTES:© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:40:04 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING GJ SB ELEVATIONS - BUILDING B B.A301The ChamberlainApartments 1/8" = 1'-0"B.A301 BLDG B - EAST ELEVATION AREA 11 1/8" = 1'-0"B.A301 BLDG B - NORTH ELEVATION3 1/8" = 1'-0"B.A301 BLDG B - EAST ELEVATION AREA 22 E01 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK-FACE CMU E2A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "1" E2B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "2" E3A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "3" E3B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "4" E4A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "5" E4B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "6" E5A 5/4" x 5-1/2" CEMENTITIOUS TRIM - PREFINISHED COLOR "TBD" E08 MULTI EXPOSURE CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - COLOR "TBD" E09 ASPHALT SHINGLES E10 ALUMINUM BALCONY - 5' x 10' TYP. E12 CULTURED STONE VENEER E13 PRECAST CONCRETE SILL E20 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LOUVER E43 6" PREFINISHED METAL RAIN GUTTER AND LEADER BLDG_B LEVEL 1 850' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 2 860' - 5 7/8" BLDG_B LEVEL 3 870' - 11 3/4" BLDG_B ROOF 880' - 0 7/8" B16B8B9B10B11B12B13B14B15 E01 E3B E5A E01 E09E3B E5A E5A E09 E01E10E5A E10 E3A E5A E10E09 E3A E5A E01 E3B E09 E10 E01 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"3A 3A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A2A 3A2A2A 2A3A3A 2A 2A2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3' - 7"3' - 7"1' - 9"4' - 0"3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6"3' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"3' - 0" E43E43E43E43E43E43E43 BLDG_B LEVEL 1 850' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 2 860' - 5 7/8" BLDG_B LEVEL 3 870' - 11 3/4" BLDG_B ROOF 880' - 0 7/8" BA BB BC BD E3B E09 E08 E01 E3A E5A E08 E01 E3B E09 E08 E01 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3' - 8 13/32"3' - 8 13/32" E43E43 E43 AREAWAY: FOR GARAGE VENTILATION E43 BLDG_B LEVEL 1 850' - 0" BLDG_B LEVEL 2 860' - 5 7/8" BLDG_B LEVEL 3 870' - 11 3/4" BLDG_B ROOF 880' - 0 7/8" B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 E3BE09E10E08 E3A E5A E08 E01 E10 E3A E5A E08 E10 E5A E08 E01E09E09 E10 E3A E5A E08 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3' - 7"3' - 7"1' - 9"4' - 0"3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6" E43E43 E43E43E43E43E43 GENERAL NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPEC EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR MATERIAL DETAILS 2.GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDINGS, COORDINATE EXTENTS OF ROCK FACED BLOCK, SMOOTH FACED COLORED BLOCK, AND FOUNDATION BLOCK WITH GRADING PLAN; REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING INFORMATION KEYNOTES:© URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:40:16 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING GJ SB ELEVATIONS - BUILDING B B.A302The ChamberlainApartments 1/8" = 1'-0"B.A302 BLDG B - WEST ELEVATION AREA 11 1/8" = 1'-0"B.A302 BLDG B - SOUTH ELEVATION3 1/8" = 1'-0"B.A302 BLDG B - WEST ELEVATION AREA 22 E01 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK-FACE CMU E2A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "1" E2B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "2" E3A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "3" E3B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "4" E4A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "5" E4B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "6" E5A 5/4" x 5-1/2" CEMENTITIOUS TRIM - PREFINISHED COLOR "TBD" E08 MULTI EXPOSURE CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - COLOR "TBD" E09 ASPHALT SHINGLES E10 ALUMINUM BALCONY - 5' x 10' TYP. E12 CULTURED STONE VENEER E13 PRECAST CONCRETE SILL E20 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LOUVER E43 6" PREFINISHED METAL RAIN GUTTER AND LEADER BLDG_C LEVEL 1 851' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 2 861' - 5 7/8" BLDG_C LEVEL 3 871' - 11 3/4" BLDG_C ROOF 881' - 0 7/8" C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 E4B E10 E08E09 E4A E5A E10 E4A E5A E10 E4A E5A E10 E4A E5AE01E09E08E01E09 E08 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"E01 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3' - 7"3' - 7"1' - 9"4' - 0"3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6"3' - 1" E43E43E43E43E43 E43 AVERAGE GRADE TO MIDPOINT OF ROOF40' - 0"E43 E43 BLDG_C LEVEL 1 851' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 2 861' - 5 7/8" BLDG_C SUBLEVEL 840' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 3 871' - 11 3/4" BLDG_C ROOF 881' - 0 7/8" CACBCCCD E4B E01 E08E09 E4A E5A E01 E08E09 E4B E01 E08 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"11' - 0"2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 3' - 9"3' - 9" E43 E43E43 E09 BLDG_C LEVEL 1 851' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 2 861' - 5 7/8" BLDG_C LEVEL 3 871' - 11 3/4" BLDG_C ROOF 881' - 0 7/8" C16C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15 E12E08 E01 E12E09 E4A E5A E01 E10 E4A E5A E10E09 E4A E5AE01 E10 E4A E5A E4B E08 E01 10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"9' - 1 1/8"2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A3A3A3A 3' - 1"3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6"4' - 0"1' - 9"3' - 7"3' - 7" E09 E43E43E43E43E43E43 KEYNOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPEC EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR MATERIAL DETAILS 2.GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDINGS, COORDINATE EXTENTS OF ROCK FACED BLOCK, SMOOTH FACED COLORED BLOCK, AND FOUNDATION BLOCK WITH GRADING PLAN; REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING INFORMATION © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:40:33 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING GJ SB ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C C.A301The ChamberlainApartments 1/8" = 1'-0"C.A301 BLDG C - WEST ELEVATION AREA 22 1/8" = 1'-0"C.A301 BLDG C - NORTH ELEVATION3 1/8" = 1'-0"C.A301 BLDG C - WEST ELEVATION (1-2)1 E01 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK-FACE CMU E2A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "1" E2B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "2" E3A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "3" E3B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "4" E4A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "5" E4B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "6" E5A 5/4" x 5-1/2" CEMENTITIOUS TRIM - PREFINISHED COLOR "TBD" E08 MULTI EXPOSURE CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - COLOR "TBD" E09 ASPHALT SHINGLES E10 ALUMINUM BALCONY - 5' x 10' TYP. E12 CULTURED STONE VENEER E13 PRECAST CONCRETE SILL E20 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LOUVER E43 6" PREFINISHED METAL RAIN GUTTER AND LEADER BLDG_C LEVEL 1 851' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 2 861' - 5 7/8" BLDG_C LEVEL 3 871' - 11 3/4" BLDG_C ROOF 881' - 0 7/8" CA CB CC CD E4B E01 E08 E4A E5A E01E08 E01 E08 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3' - 9"3' - 9" E09E43 E43 E43 AREA WAY: FOR GARAGE VENTILATION E43 BLDG_C LEVEL 1 851' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 2 861' - 5 7/8" BLDG_C LEVEL 3 871' - 11 3/4" BLDG_C ROOF 881' - 0 7/8" C16 C8C9C10C11C12C13C14C15 E4B E01 E08 E5A E01 E08 E08 E10 E5A E08 E10 E5A E01 E08 E10E08 E5A E4B E5A E4B E01 E5A E4A 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"3A2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A2A3A 3A2A2A2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 2A 2A 3A 3A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 2A 2A 3A3A 3' - 7"3' - 7"1' - 9"4' - 0"3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6"3' - 0"4' - 0"4' - 0"3' - 0" E09 E43 E43E43E43 E43 E09 E09E43 E43E43E09E43E43 BLDG_C LEVEL 1 851' - 0" BLDG_C LEVEL 2 861' - 5 7/8" BLDG_C LEVEL 3 871' - 11 3/4" BLDG_C ROOF 881' - 0 7/8" C1C2C3C4C5C6C7 E5A E08 E01 E4A E5A E10 E4A E5A E08 E01 E10 E4A E5A E4B E08 E01E10 9' - 1 1/8"10' - 5 7/8"10' - 5 7/8"2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 3A 2A 2A 3' - 6"3' - 1"3' - 6"4' - 0"1' - 9"3' - 7"3' - 7" E43E09E43E43 E09E43E10E43E09E20E43E43E43 KEYNOTES: GENERAL NOTES: 1.REFER TO SPEC EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FOR MATERIAL DETAILS 2.GRADE VARIES AROUND BUILDINGS, COORDINATE EXTENTS OF ROCK FACED BLOCK, SMOOTH FACED COLORED BLOCK, AND FOUNDATION BLOCK WITH GRADING PLAN; REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING INFORMATION © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/14/2017 11:40:51 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 - Richfield Housing\17-0007 A17 scott.beckmanl.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING GJ SB ELEVATIONS - BUILDING C C.A302The ChamberlainApartments 1/8" = 1'-0"C.A302 BLDG C - SOUTH ELEVATION13 1/8" = 1'-0"C.A302 BLDG C - EAST ELEVATION AREA 11 1/8" = 1'-0"C.A302 BLDG C - EAST ELEVATION AREA 22 E01 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK-FACE CMU E2A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "1" E2B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "2" E3A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "3" E3B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "4" E4A PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "5" E4B PREFINISHED CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - SMOOTH TEXTURE - COLOR "6" E5A 5/4" x 5-1/2" CEMENTITIOUS TRIM - PREFINISHED COLOR "TBD" E08 MULTI EXPOSURE CEMENTITIOUS LAP SIDING - COLOR "TBD" E09 ASPHALT SHINGLES E10 ALUMINUM BALCONY - 5' x 10' TYP. E12 CULTURED STONE VENEER E13 PRECAST CONCRETE SILL E20 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LOUVER E43 6" PREFINISHED METAL RAIN GUTTER AND LEADER 1 2 56 3 4 RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 1REPRESENTATIONAL VIEW LOCATIONS RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 2REPRESENTATIONAL VIEWS 1 RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 3REPRESENTATIONAL VIEWS 2 RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 4REPRESENTAIONAL VIEWS 3 RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 5REPRESENTATIONAL VIEWS 4 RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 6REPRESENTATIONAL VIEWS 5 RICHFIELD, MN / 08.14.2017 / 17-0007 Kraus - Anderson : Inland Development - Chamberlain Apartments 7REPRESENTATIONAL VIEWS 6 © URBANWORKS ARCHITECTURE LLC, 2017901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 145, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY REVISIONS DATE PROJECT # PHASE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING & ZONING APPLICATION 08.14.2017 8/23/2017 9:38:28 AMC:\!Revit Project Files\17-0007 A17 Central_john.seppanen.rvtRICHFIELD, MN08.14.2017 17-0007 PLANNING & ZONING Author Checker SHADOW STUDY AL120The ChamberlainApartmentsN FOR REFERENCE ONLYMARCH / SEPTEMBER 21, 9:00AM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYJUNE 21, 9:00AM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYDECEMBER 21, 9:00AM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYMARCH / SEPTEMBER 21, 12:00PM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYJUNE 21, 12:00PM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYDECEMBER 21, 12:00PM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYMARCH / SEPTEMBER 21, 3:00PM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYJUNE 21, 3:00PM N FOR REFERENCE ONLYDECEMBER 21, 3:00PM AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.J. STAFF REPORT NO. 130 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: Melissa P oehlman, A ssistant C ommunity D evelopment D irector D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 9/6/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a first reading of an ordinance that would make small wireless facilities a conditional use in residential districts. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: State law gives "telec ommunic ations right of way users" the right to install facilities in the right of way. This right is subjec t to loc al governmental authority to manage right of way permitting. I n 2017, the Minnesota Legislature amended the definition of a "telecommunic ations right of way user" to inc lude persons deploying facilities to provide "wireless service." W ireless providers may deploy a "small wireless facility" or a "wireless support structure" in the right of way. W hile the city 's authority to deny permits in the right of way is limited, cities may make suc h facilities or struc tures a conditional use in right of way loc ated in "a distric t or area zoned for single-family residential use or within a historic district." The c ity council held a work session to discuss this issue on J uly 25, 2017 and directed city staff to move forward with an amendment to make these facilities a conditional use in single- family residential areas. The attached ordinance is a first step. The city will continue to evaluate specific conditions to attac h to these facilities (separation requirements, etc.), but given that cities are not permitted to adopt a moratorium to study the issue, the c ity attorney has advised simply making suc h uses c onditional and utilizing the standard requirements of a conditional use permit for the time being. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a first reading of the attached ordinance making "small wireless facilities" a conditional use in the Single-Family (R and R-1) D istricts. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT None B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Statute defines "small" as antennas not exceeding six c ubic feet, and all associated equipment, excluding c ertain types (e.g. back-up generators), must either be c oncealed or less than 28 cubic feet. This is approximately the size of a refrigerator. I n order to be an authorized support structure, any proposed new pole cannot exceed the littlest of 50 feet or 10 feet above an existing pole that is being replac ed unless the local government allows a greater height. Local governments may deny permits based on reasonable health, welfare and safety concerns; on "reasonable accommodations for decorative wireless support structures or signs," or upon "any reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements" for a new wireless support structure in the right of way. Local governments may also impose separation requirements between new poles or other wireless support structures. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The 2017 Session Law amendments were effec tive immediately upon adoption. The City Attorney rec ommends modific ations to city ordinanc es as soon as possible. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: None E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : A public hearing to consider this ordinance was held before the Planning Commission on August 28, 2017. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the attached ordinance. The C ounc il will consider final adoption of the ordinance on September 26, 2017. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type D raft Ordi nance Ordinance DRAFT BILL NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE REGULATIONS RELATED TO CONDITIONAL USES IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R AND R-1) DISTRICTS THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Subsection 514.05, Subd. 11 of the Richfield City Code related to permitted uses in the Single-Family (R) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 11. Minor public utilities., excluding “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.” Section 2 Subsection 514.07, Subd. 12 of the Richfield City Code related to conditional uses in the Single-Family (R) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 12. Major public utilities., and “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.” Section 3 Subsection 518.05, Subd. 11 of the Richfield City Code related to permitted uses in the Low-Density Single-Family (R-1) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 11. Minor public utilities., excluding “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.” Section 4 Subsection 518.07, Subd. 4 of the Richfield City Code related to conditional uses in the Low-Density Single-Family (R-1) Zoning District is amended to read as follows: Subd. 4. Major public utilities., and “small wireless facilities” and associated “wireless support structures.” Section 5 This Ordinance is effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the Richfield City Charter. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 26th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.K. STAFF REPORT NO. 131 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ulie Urban, Housing Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ohn S tark, C ommunity D evelopment D i rector 9/6/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution supporting a grant application to H ennepin County for the Cedar Point South/Chamberlain project. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Hennepin County released a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program Request for Proposals in August. The TOD program offers grants and loans to support redevelopment and new c onstruc tion that enhances transit usage. $1.7 million is available in the Fall 2017 funding round, and applic ations are due on September 14, 2017. Staff is proposing to submit a request for $200,000 in grant funding to construc t a segment of the Three Rivers Parks regional trail through the proposed C edar Point South project. A n additional $250,000 in ac quisition funding is being requested to begin ac quisition of houses located on 17th Avenue where a future townhome phase has been suggested. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) agreed to apply for funds as part of the development agreement adopted by the HRA on August 29, 2017. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution supporting the submittal of a grant application to Hennepin County for Transit O riented Development funds for the C edar Point South/Chamberlain project. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The C edar Corridor Redevelopment Area was established in 2004 to provide a transition between the airport/c ommercial development areas to the east and the single-family residential areas to the west. I nland Development Partners is proposing to redevelop a portion of the C edar Corridor south of 66th S treet with the c onstruction of high-density, multi-family housing and the rehabilitation of three existing, medium-density apartment buildings. Met Council grant funds were received to rec onstruc t the Parkway; however, the reconstruction of the trail is not an eligible expense with those funds, so additional funds are needed. Staff has applied for TOD funds for the projec t in the past; however, the projec t was not considered far enough along to warrant funding. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Hennepin C ounty requires the applicant to submit a resolution in support of the grant application. I t is the C ity's policy to seek grant funding when available and as appropriate. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The grant applic ation is due on September 14, 2017. Funds would be awarded in November or D ec ember, 2017. Funds must be expended by J une 30, 2020. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Grant funding in the amount $450,000 is being requested. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The D evelopment Agreement approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) on August 29, 2017, requires the HRA to apply for the grant on behalf of the development. The C ity will be required to enter into a grant agreement with Hennepin County, if funding is awarded. The C ity Attorney will review the grant agreement prior to execution. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Do not approve the resolution. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FUNDS FOR CEDAR POINT SOUTH WHEREAS, the City of Richfield (the “City”) is a city located within Hennepin county and is therefore eligible to access the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant; and WHEREAS, the City had identified certain property for redevelopment within the Cedar Corridor Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, Inland Development Partners has proposed a redevelopment project within the Cedar Corridor Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the City approves participation in this program as a multi- jurisdictional project; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need for, and benefit of, transit oriented improvements as part of this proposed development. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council supports and otherwise affirms and ratifies the submittal of application (in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 383B.77, Subd. 3.), for the Transit Oriented Design Program administered by Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute any agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. __________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.L. STAFF REPORT NO. 132 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J enni fer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 8/24/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a request for the temporary expansion of the licensed premises for Davanni's, located at 6345 Penn Avenue S outh, to allow for the outside ser vice of strong beer on Sunday, September 17, 2017, in conjunction with Richfield's O pen Streets at P enn Fest event. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On J uly 18, 2017, Davanni's requested permission to serve strong beer outside in the parking lot area of their lic ensed establishment in c onjunc tion with Ric hfield's Open Streets at Penn Fest event. W hile D avanni's is currently licensed to sell wine and strong beer, their license is only valid for the interior area of their business and does not allow for outside service of alcohol. This request for a temporary expansion of the licensed premises for Davanni's would allow for the service of strong beer only, and would be valid only on Sunday, September 17, 2017, from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. during Richfield's Open Streets at Penn Fest event. All required information and documents have been provided. The Director of Public Safety has reviewed all required information and doc uments and has found no basis for denial. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: Approve a request for a temporary expansion of the licensed premises for D avanni's, located at 6345 P enn Avenue South, to allow for the outside service of strong beer on Sunday, September 17, 2017, in conjunction with R ichfield's Open Streets at Penn Fest event. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The following requirements have been met: The C ity has been provided with a written narrative and drawing of the parking area showing how Davanni's will c ontrol the flow of patrons purchasing beer and how they will be contained and monitored. P roof of liquor liability insuranc e covering the exterior of the premises has been provided showing Christensen Group I nsuranc e affording the coverage. The applic ant has contacted the food sanitarians from the C ity of Bloomington to ensure proper food handling practices are followed. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Richfield C ity Code Section 1202.05 requires all applicants to comply with all of the provisions of this code, as well as the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 340A . C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Open Streets at Penn Fest takes place on September 17, 2017, so approval by the City Council is required at the regular meeting on S eptember 12. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: This is a temporary expansion for the premises of their current alcohol lic ense, so no fee is required for the temporary expansion permit. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Minnesota Statute 340A.410, Subd. 7, states a licensing authority may issue a retail alcoholic beverage lic ense only for a space that is compac t and c ontiguous and the retail alc oholic beverage lic ense is only effective for the licensed premises specified in the approved application which, in this case, is the interior of their business only. I n previous y ears, the C ity attorney has advised the staff that the Council would need to approve an expansion bey ond the interior walls of any establishment not already licensed for outdoor service. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The C ounc il could deny the request for the temporary expansion of the lic ensed premises for Davanni's. This would mean the applicant would not be able to serve strong beer outside in the parking lot area of their establishment during Richfield's Open Streets at Penn Fest event. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: Melissa Morrissette - General Manager AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Narrative, drawi ng and Insurance for D avanni's C over Memo AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.M. STAFF REPORT NO. 133 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J enni fer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 8/24/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a request for the temporary expansion of the licensed premises for Thompson's Fireside Piz za, Inc., d/b/a Fireside Foundry, located at 6736 P enn Avenue South, to allow for the outside ser vice of wine and strong beer in their parking lot on S unday, September 17, 2017, in conjunction with Richfield's O pen Streets at P enn Fest event. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On August 16, 2017, Thompson's Fireside Pizza, I nc ., d/b/a Fireside Foundry, requested permission to serve wine and strong beer outside in the parking lot area of their lic ensed establishment in c onjunc tion with Richfield's Open S treets at Penn Fest event. W hile Fireside Foundry is currently lic ensed to sell intoxicating liquor, their license is only valid for the interior and outside patio areas of their business and does not allow for outside servic e, bey ond the patio, of alcohol. This request for a temporary expansion of the licensed premises for Thompson's Fireside Pizza, I nc., d/b/a Fireside Foundry, would allow for the service of wine and strong beer only, and would be valid only on Sunday, September 17, 2017, from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. during Richfield's Open Streets at Penn Fest event. All required information and documents have been provided. The Director of Public Safety has reviewed all required information and doc uments and has found no basis for denial. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the request for a temporary expansion of the licensed premises for Thompson's Fireside Pizza, Inc., d/b/a Fireside Foundr y, located at 6736 Penn Avenue S outh, to allow for the outside service of wine and strong beer in their parking lot on Sunday, S eptember 17, 2017, in conjunction with Richfield's O pen Streets at P enn Fest event. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The following requirements have been met: The C ity has been provided with a written narrative and drawing of the parking area showing how Fireside Foundry will c ontrol the flow of patrons purchasing beer and how they will be c ontained and monitored. P roof of liquor liability insuranc e covering the exterior of the premises has been provided showing W est Bend Mutual affording the coverage. The applic ant has contacted the food sanitarians from the C ity of Bloomington to ensure proper food handling practices are followed. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Richfield C ity Code Section 1202.05 requires all applicants to comply with all of the provisions of this code, as well as the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 340A . C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Open Streets at Penn Fest takes place on September 17, 2017, so approval by the City Council is required at the regular meeting on S eptember 12. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: This is a temporary expansion for the premises of their current alcohol lic ense, so no fee is required for the temporary expansion permit. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : Minnesota Statute 340A.410, Subd. 7, states a licensing authority may issue a retail alcoholic beverage lic ense only for a space that is compac t and c ontiguous and the retail alc oholic beverage lic ense is only effective for the licensed premises specified in the approved application which, in this case, is the interior of their business only. I n previous y ears, the C ity attorney has advised the staff that the Council would need to approve an expansion bey ond the interior walls of any establishment not already licensed for outdoor service. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The C ounc il could deny the request for the temporary expansion of the lic ensed premises Fireside Foundry. This would mean the applicant would not be able to serve wine and strong beer outside in the parking lot area of their establishment during Ric hfield's Open Streets at P enn Fest event. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: Representative of Fireside Foundry. AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Narrative, drawi ng and insurance for F iresi de F oundry C over Memo AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.N. STAFF REPORT NO. 134 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J enni fer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 8/23/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution appointing H ealth Administrator Anderson as the Boar d of Health's (City C ouncil) agent on matters relating to the Minnesota Depar tment of Health as it relates to Richfield's Local Public Health grant. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Minnesota Department of Health requires that eac h Board of Health (City Council) appoint an agent who may be reached between board meetings by agents of the Commissioner of Health in c ase of, for example, a disease outbreak or a problem related to other public health responsibilities. The Minnesota D epartment of Health requests that this information be updated. This was last done in 2014 and is simply a housekeeping item that needs to be acc omplished to meet the S tate Statute requirements. Health Administrator, J ennifer Anderson, will ac t in that capacity on behalf of the City C ounc il. To avoid any confusion, it should be noted that the Board of Health is technic ally the City C ounc il while the Advisory Board of Health, whic h is made up of c itizens, is an Advisory Board to the City C ounc il on health related matters. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: Approve a resolution appointing H ealth Administrator Anderson as the Board of Health's (City Council) agent on matters relating to the Minnesota Department of H ealth as it relates to Richfield's Local P ublic Health grant. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The Minnesota D epartment of Health requires that each Board of Health (City C ounc il) appoint an agent who may be reac hed between board meetings by agents of the Commissioner of Health in case of, for example, a disease outbreak or a problem related to other public health responsibilities. The Minnesota Department of Health requests that this information be updated. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Health A dministrator Osborn was named as the Board of Health's (City C ounc il) agent in both 1990, 1993 and 2014. An updated resolution is necessary at this time. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: N/A D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Appointing an agent to the Board of Health (C ity Council) is one of the requirements that must be met in order to remain eligible to be able to continue to receive Loc al Public Health funds from the Minnesota Department of Health. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : N/A ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The C ounc il could decide not to appoint the Health Administrator as the Board’s agent with the Minnesota Department of Health. This would mean that the City of Richfield would not be in c omplianc e with the Loc al Public Health Act until another agent had been named. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution authorizing to appoint an agent to act on the B oard of Health's behalf re: public health responsi bilities Resolution L etter RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING to Appoint an Agent to Act on the Board of Health's behalf regarding Public Health Responsibilities WHEREAS, Resolution No. 8002, approved by the City Council on April 12, 1993, is superseded by this updated resolution; WHEREAS, the City Council acts as the Community Health Board (“Board’) for the City of Richfield by virtue of its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145A, in accordance with the Board’s articles and bylaws, and by this Resolution of the Board adopted at a scheduled meeting held on January 14, 2014, hereby appoints and authorizes the following person(s) to act on the Boards behalf and bind the Board for the following purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Richfield City Council hereby appoints and authorizes the following person (s) to act on the Board’s behalf and bind the board for the following purpose; 1. To serve as the Board’s agent according to Minnesota Statute 145A.04, Subd. 2, to implement the provisions of the Local Public Health Act (Chapter 145A of Minnesota Statutes) including, but not limited to, the authority to remove or abate threats to the public health such as a public health nuisance, source of filth or cause of sickness found on any property, and initiate action to recover the costs of enforcement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 145A.04 Subd. 8 and 145A.08. Designation of authority includes communicating with the Commissioner of Health and disseminating that information to the Board, as well as providing information to the Commissioner of Health on the Board’s behalf. Name: Jennifer J. Anderson Address: 6700 Portland Avenue South Phone number: 612 861-9881 Fax: 612 861-9824 2. To sign and submit to the Commissioner the prepared Community Health Plan, revisions to the Plan and activity reports submitted according to Minnesota Statute 145A.10, subd. 5a and 10. Name: Jennifer J. Anderson Address: 6700 Portland Avenue South Phone number: 612 861-9881 Fax: 612 861-9824 3. To sign and submit to the Commissioner the Board’s annual budget, revisions to the budgets, and expenditure reports submitted according to Minnesota Statutes 145A. Name: Jennifer J. Anderson Address: 6700 Portland Avenue South Phone number: 612 861-9881 Fax: 612 861-9824 4. To sign and execute on behalf of the Board contracts for funding administered by the Commissioner of Health. Name: Jennifer J. Anderson Address: 6700 Portland Avenue South Phone number: 612 861-9881 Fax: 612 861-9824 This resolution authorizes the above referenced appointee to act on behalf of and bind the board to the extent and for the purposes indicated in this resolution. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. ________________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor Attest: ___________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.O. STAFF REPORT NO. 135 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J enni fer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 8/23/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of the continuation of the agreement with the C ity of Bloomington for the provision of food inspection services for R ichfield for the year 2018. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The City of Bloomington and the City of Richfield have had a c ontrac t for over 30 years for Bloomington to provide inspection and enforcement services in the areas of food, beverage, lodging, and public swimming pools along with plan chec k work for food servic es to Richfield. The proposed c ontrac t for 2018 for these servic es will be $134,200, c ompared to the 2017 contract amount of $130,300. This is a 3% increase over the dollar amount paid to Bloomington in 2017. The inc rease is tied into inc reased benefit costs and staff salaries. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the continuation of the agr eement with the City of Bloomington for the provision of food inspection services for Richfield for 2018. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Contained in the Exec utive Summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The C ity of Bloomington has suffic ient resources to provide a professional level of inspec tion services to Ric hfield residents. Annual evaluations of their services have shown they are providing effic ient servic es in a cost-effective manner. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: N/A D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: A 3% budget increase has been communicated to Ric hfield by Bloomington, so the amount of $134,200 has been c aptured in Ric hfield's 2018 budget. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney has reviewed the contract and has approved of it and its c ontents. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The C ounc il could decide to have Richfield provide it's own food servic e inspec tions, beverage and lodging and the public swimming pools inspec tions and plan to check food servic es; however, the State would have to approve this change and would likely be conc erned about staffing, response and capacity issues. The cost of hiring the necessary staff to provide the same level of services and administrative support would be more that the c urrent expenditures and would require a significant budget inc rease. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type 2018 F ood Inspection C ontract C over Memo AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.P. STAFF REPORT NO. 136 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 9/1/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of an agreement allowing Richfield Depar tment of Public Safety to accept grant monies from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, the Edward Byrne Memor ial Justice Assistance G rant (JAG ) Program. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Ric hfield Polic e Department is eligible to receive the Edward By rne Memorial J ustic e Assistanc e Grants (J A G) from the Department of J ustice and has been awarded a grant for $9,656.75. The grant money will be used by Public Safety for training and purchasing of equipment. Grant funding is based on a threshold of reported Part I c rimes whic h are in comparison to the population of the respective community. Several Hennepin County munic ipalities receive these grants inc luding the cities of Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brookly n P ark, and Minneapolis. The J A G Grants are administered through Hennepin County's Offic e of Administration. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution allowing Richfield D epartment of Public S afety to accept grant monies from the U .S. D epartment of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, the Justice Assistance Grant (J AG ) Program. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The grant money will be used by P ublic Safety for training and purc hasing of equipment. The Public Safety D epartment has been informed that additional funds will be made available to the department as part of the Edward B yrne Memorial J ustice Assistance Grant (J A G). The grant allows states, tribes and loc al governments to support a broad range of ac tivities to prevent and control crime based on their own local needs and c onditions. Notification was rec eived that the City of Richfield was approved to receive $9,656.75 from the J A G Grant for 2017. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Public Safety does not acc ept financial support unless it is designated for a specific program that will affect the department as a whole. The grant money will be used by P ublic Safety for training and purc hasing of equipment. Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires that every acc eptance of a grant or devise of real of personal property on terms prescribed by the donor be made by resolution of more than two-thirds majority of the City C ounc il. The A dministrative Servic es Department issued a memo on November 9, 2004 requiring that all grants and restric ted donations to departments be rec eived by resolution and by more than two- thirds majority of the City Council in ac cordanc e with Minnesota S tatute 465.03. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The grant money will be used by P ublic Safety for training and purc hasing of equipment D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Five percent (5%) or $482.84 of the total $9,656.75 has been removed as approved by the administrator of the grant for administrative c osts. Ric hfield Public S afety will receive $9,173.91. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : N/A ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Council c ould disapprove of the acceptanc e of the grant monies and the funds would have to be returned. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter A greement C ontract/A greement RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/POLICE TO ACCEPT THE EDWARDS BYRNE MEMORIAL GRANT (JAG) FOR $9,656.75 FROM THE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS TO BE USED FOR REPLACING THE SQUAD CAR RIFLES CURRENTLY USED BY RICHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS WHEREAS, Richfield Police has been approved by U.S. Department of Justice to participate in funds available to several Hennepin County departments through the Edwards Byrne Memorial Grant (JAG); and WHEREAS, Richfield is scheduled to be awarded $10,240 to be used as designated by grant agreement which mandates that the funds be used for law enforcement related programs and or equipment; and,. WHEREAS, Richfield has agreed that Hennepin County will serve as the fiscal agent on behalf of the Cities of Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Minneapolis, and Richfield; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the agreement, five percent (5%) ($482.84) of the total amount ($9,656.75) has been set aside for the costs associated with administering the JAG funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield, Public Safety Department will accept funds designated for police programs and equipment in accordance to and as listed above. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. ________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, (the “COUNTY”), the Cities of Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Richfield and Minneapolis (“CITIES”) (COUNTY and/or Cities may be individually called a “PARTY” and collectively called “PARTIES”). WHEREAS, the PARTIES, authorize the COUNTY to submit a grant application to the United States Department of Justice for the FY17 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (the “GRANT”) (The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance -- CFDA number for this grant is 16.738.) on behalf of the PARTIES and to serve as fiscal agent for the PARTIES; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES recognize the need to set forth the duties and obligations of the PARTIES with respect to the administration of the Grant; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual undertakings and agreements hereafter set forth, the PARTIES hereby agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by all PARTIES on October 1, 2016 and shall continue through September 30, 2020, or the completion of the services provided hereunder, whichever is earlier, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions herein. Any Party may cancel this Agreement immediately if the Party reasonably believes there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, or failure to comply with the terms of the Grant award, rules, or guidelines or failure to comply with applicable law. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED Hennepin County will submit the FY17 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant application 2017-H2280-MN-DJ (“Grant”). Contract Numbers: City of Bloomington A177747 City of Brooklyn Center A177748 City of Brooklyn Park A177749 City of Minneapolis A177750 City of Richfield A177751 In the event all Grant funds are received, each local unit of government will receive grant funds in the following amounts: BLOOMINGTON $ 16,183.25 BROOKLYN CENTER $ 13,316.15 BROOKLYN PARK $ 32,027.35 MINNEAPOLIS $ 269,337.77 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENTS $ 203,184.63 HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR ADMINISTRATION $ 28,616.10 RICHFIELD $ 9,656.75 Total $572,322.00 If the Grant funds are less than $572,322, the parties shall distribute the actual funds received in proportion to the table above less the costs of administration set forth herein. If any Grant funds are received, Hennepin County shall serve as the fiscal agent on behalf of the above named local units of government. The COUNTY shall provide financial administrative services necessary for the administration of the grant, including but not limited to the following: Satisfy financial and administrative grant requirements. Submit financial, programmatic and similar reports required under the grant. Work with the Department of Justice to resolve administrative issues. Comply with grant conditions regarding financial administration of the grant including but not limited to reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements prescribed by the grant. Coordinate compliance with the organization audit requirements attached to the grant. Manage grant funds. Pursuant to applicable accounting standards and procedures, maintain financial and accounting books and records as shall be necessary, appropriate and convenient for the proper administration of the grant. For serving as fiscal agent hereunder, COUNTY shall be paid an administrative fee equal to five percent (5%) of the Grant Funds, to be paid upon receipt of the Grant funds, 3. DUTIES OF THE PARTIES The PARTIES, individual and collectively, acknowledge that COUNTY will be administering the Grant on their behalf and agree to cooperate fully with COUNTY in all matter with respect to such grant administration so as to allow COUNTY to satisfy the grant requirements, including but not limited to the following acts: Comply with the provisions of the Grant award, rules, and guidelines and comply with applicable law including, as applicable, but not limited to the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 as amended and Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133. Maintain books and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of grant funds for six (6) years after expiration of this Agreement. Report on performance measurement goals to the other PARTIES on a quarterly basis. Upon request, report the receipt and expenditures to the other PARTIES on a quarterly basis, then report a final accounting, pursuant to applicable accounting standards, upon expiration of this Agreement. Supply full and complete information, as requested by COUNTY, so as to allow COUNTY to satisfy the grant conditions and requirements. Work together with COUNTY to ensure that all grant conditions and requirements are met. Provide COUNTY with data and information sufficient for COUNTY to meet its reporting, data collection and evaluation requirements as prescribed by the grant. Eligible expenditures under this grant contract must be incurred by the grantee by the expiration date of the grant agreement. Abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality. 4. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION Each PARTY agrees that it will be responsible for its own errors, acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the errors, acts and omissions of any other PARTY and the results thereof. CITIES agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY from all liabilities, claims, demands, losses, costs, expenses and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost of defense thereof, resulting from or related to COUNTY’S role as fiscal agent hereunder. The PARTIES liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. Under no circumstances shall a PARTY be required to pay on behalf of itself and other PARTIES any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one PARTY. The statutory limits of liability for some or all of the PARTIES may not be added together or stacked to increase the maximum amount of liability for any party. 5. COUNTERPARTS This agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be regarded as an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same Agreement. THIS PORTION OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Reviewed by the County STATE OF MINNESOTA Attorney’s Office By: ______________________________________ Jan Callison, Chair of Its County Board Date: _____________________________________ ATTEST: Deputy/Clerk of County Board Date: And: David Hough, County Administrator Date: CITY OF RICHFIELD By: ___________________Date: ______________ Mayor ____________________________________ Pat Elliott And: __________________Date: ______________ Title/Name: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES ARE INCLUDED ON ADDITIONAL PAGES AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.Q. STAFF REPORT NO. 137 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 8/29/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution authoriz ing acceptance of O ffice of Traffic Safety (O TS ) funds for a four-year grant to fully fund an officer and fully equipped squad car dedicated for D W I enforcement in R ichfield. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is providing federal funding to the OTS to implement a program to support eight full time officers and equipment needed to enforce traffic laws, inc luding squad cars to be used solely for D W I enforcement. Eight counties, inc luding Hennepin, were chosen to receive grant funding. The grant is administered through the OTS. The grant will be guaranteed for four year, but will be written for one federal fiscal year at a time. The City of Richfield has been awarded $104,448 for 2018. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Appr ove a resolution allowing the R ichfield Department of Public Safety to accept grant monies from the Office of Traffic Safety (O T S) for a four-year grant to fully fund an officer and fully equipped squad car dedicated for D W I enfor cement in R ichfield. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT I n 2013, it was estimated that by the National Safety Counc il that the c ost of alc ohol-related crashes in Minnesota was $235 million. I n that same year, 20 percent of those involved in alcohol related crashes were seriously injured and another 30 perc ent were killed. The average number of D W I arrests per year in Richfield is 124. The goal is to increase that to 175 D W I arrests per year. I n 2014, Richfield had 18 D W I crashes. From October 1, 2015 to S eptember 30, 2016 there were 16 D W I c rashes, whic h is the fiscal year for State of Minnesota agencies. (As of the date of this staff report we are unable to get updated statistical data from the S tate of Minnesota) Minnesota Motor Vehicle Crash Fac ts data show that the hours between 5:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m. as having the highest conc entration of alcohol related crashes. The D W I offic er's work shift will be from 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. with a minimum of two Fridays and two S aturdays per month to be a required part of the D W I officer's sc hedule. Statistic s will be chec ked daily, including but not limited to: speed tic kets, seat belt tickets, texting tickets, "Not a Drop" tickets and warnings associated with these statistics. Proactive criminal interdic tion patrol would also be implemented. The C ity of Ric hfield has been approved to receive $104,448 from the D W I Offic er grant for 2018. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Public Safety does not acc ept financial support unless it is designated for a specific program that will affect the department as a whole. The grant money will be used by P ublic Safety to pay for one full-time polic e offic er salary ; inc luding overtime and/or training. Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires that every acc eptance of a grant or devise of real or personal property on terms prescribed by the donor be made by resolution of more than two-thirds majority of the City C ounc il. The Administrative Services D epartment issued a memo on November 9, 2004, requiring that all grants and restricted donations to departments be rec eived by resolution and by more than two-thirds majority of the City C ounc il in accordance with Minnesota Statute 465.03. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The total length of the grant is expec ted to be for four y ears, however, grants will be written for one federal fiscal year at a time. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Federal guidelines require this money be spent on projec ts designed to reduce D W I incidents. Both the offic er and majority of the equipment funded by the grant c an only be used for the enforcement of laws prohibiting driving while impaired. I f the D W I officer responds to, or is called to an inc ident for something other than an alcohol-related driving offense, the time spent on non-D W I related enforc ement exceeding 15 suc cessive minutes must be paid for by the agency. The vehicle will be assigned to and driven solely by the D W I offic er. The Ric hfield Department of Public Safety has developed a work plan and budget that have been approved by the OTS. The grant will c over one full-time sworn offic er, fringe benefits and a squad c ar with the necessary equipment to enforce traffic laws. Squad operating c osts per mile, maintenance, uniforms and weapons are not c overed by the grant. The Ric hfield Department of P ublic Safety has funds budgeted for items not c overed by the grant. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : There are no legal considerations. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Council c ould disapprove the acceptance of the grant monies but the Ric hfield Department of Public Safety would then not be able to dedicate an officer and fully equipped squad c ar to D W I enforcement. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type D W I Grant Resolution Resolution L etter D W I Grant Officer A greement C ontract/A greement C ertificati on Regarding L obbying C over Memo RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY/POLICE TO ACCEPT GRANT MONIES FROM THE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY IN THE AMOUNT OF $104,448 OR A LESSER AMOUNT, AS AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TO FUND A POLICE OFFICER AND FULLY EQUIPPED SQUAD DEDICATED TO DWI ENFORCMENT FOR FOUR YEARS. WHEREAS, Richfield Police Department has been approved by the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to receive funds made available to eight Counties in the State of Minnesota through federal funding provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); and WHEREAS, Richfield is scheduled to be awarded $104,448 or a lesser amount as awarded by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety to be used as designated by the grant agreement which mandates that the funds be used to support one full time officer, a squad car and the equipment dedicated to DWI enforcement for a term of four years; and, WHEREAS, Richfield has agreed that the Minnesota Department of Public Safety will serve as the fiscal agent; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the agreement, squad operating costs per mile, maintenance, uniforms, weapons and time spent in excess of 15 minutes on non-DWI related calls will be covered by the Richfield Police Department; and, WHEREAS, Richfield Police has established an approved budget with the OTS for $104,448 or a lessor amount for the DWI enforcement program; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield, Public Safety Department enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, for traffic safety enforcement projects during the period from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.R. STAFF REPORT NO. 138 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 8/29/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/6/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a resolution authoriz ing a new four-year contract to provide two Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison Officer services for School Distr ict #280 at the Richfield High School and the R ichfield Middle School. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Currently, the C ity of Ric hfield Department of P ublic Safety has a c ontract with Ric hfield Public Sc hools Distric t 280 to provide two J uvenile I nvestigator/S chool Liaison Offic er servic es to the sc hool district. The current contract expired on J une 30, 2017. The D epartment of Public Safety would like to enter into a new contract with the sc hool district. The renewed contract would be effec tive from J uly 1, 2017 through J une 30, 2021. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a resolution authorizing a contract to provide two police officers as Juvenile Investigator/S chool Liaison O fficer Services to School D istrict #280 at the Richfield H igh School and Richfield Middle S chool, along with other schools in the district, as necessar y. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT Richfield Polic e Department has provided Sc hool D istrict #280 with J uvenile I nvestigator/School Liaison Offic er services since 1993. The most c urrent contract between School Distric t #280 and the Ric hfield Police D epartment expired J une 30, 2017. A new four year contract (J uly 1, 2017 to J une 30, 2021) for the c ontinued servic es of the J uvenile I nvestigator/School Liaison Officer servic es has been agreed upon by Steven Unowsky, Superintendent of sc hools for Richfield Distric t #280, and Steven D evich, Richfield City Manager. The new c ontrac t will provide two officers from the Richfield Police D epartment as J uvenile I nvestigator/Sc hool Liaison Officer services at Ric hfield Senior High S chool and Richfield Middle School. Both J uvenile I nvestigator/Sc hool Liaison Officer will work with the other sc hools in the distric t as needed. The primary duties of the J uvenile I nvestigator/Sc hool Liaison Offic er services are to: promote the safety & welfare of the students in c onjunc tion with school staff and administrators, prevent delinquency & investigate criminal or delinquent conduc t, encourage positive attitudes towards the law and law enforcement, deter child abuse and neglec t and assist school administrators in determining the proper course of action when phy sical violence occ urs, advise school administration on matters of building sec urity & occ upant safety and promote positive youth development. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): School Distric t #280 wishes to enter into the c ontrac t for two J uvenile I nvestigator/School Liaison Offic er positions and c ontinue a partnership with the City. Richfield Polic e Department wishes to c ontinue a contract with the sc hool district to provide the J uvenile I nvestigator/School Liaison Officer servic es. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The c urrent contract expired J une 30, 2017. A 30-day written notice must be given to terminate the contract. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: For this renewal period and each fiscal period thereafter, funds contributing to the salary shall be paid by Ric hfield School District #280 to the City for two J uvenile I nvestigator/School Liaison Offic er services. The renewal contract dollar amount shall be adjusted annually at the end of each sc hool y ear to reflect a maximum annual compensation of: $76,730 in 2017-18 $78,265 in 2018-19 $79,830 in 2019-20 $81,427 in 2020-21 E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : There are no legal considerations. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Council may not approve the contract. S chool Distric t #280 would then need to contract with another law enforcement jurisdic tion to provide the servic es. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter P olice/S chool L iaison 2017-2021 C ontract/A greement RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD/PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT AND RICHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT #280 TO APPROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT FUNDS TO PROVIDE TWO RICHFIELD OFFICERS AS SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICERS AT THE RICHFIELD SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND THE RICHFIELD MIDDLE SCHOOL, AND OTHER SCHOOLS IN THE DISTRIC AS NECESSARY WHEREAS, Richfield Police Department has provided school liaison service to the Richfield School District #280 since 1993; and, WHEREAS, the 2013-2017 contract between the Richfield Police Department and the Richfield School District #280 expired on June 30, 2017; and, WHEREAS, a new four year contract has been agreed upon between the City of Richfield and the Richfield School District #280; and, WHEREAS, the new contract will call for Richfield Police Department to provide two police officers as juvenile liaison officers to the Richfield School District #280 from July 1, 2017-June 30, 2021; and, WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Public Safety Department is authorized to accept funds for compensation for two police officers to serve as school liaison officer to the Richfield School District #280. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield enter into a cooperative agreement with the Richfield School District #280, to provide school liaison services. Steven Devich Richfield City Manager, and Jay Henthorne, Public Safety Director, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Richfield, Department of Public Safety. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. ________________________ Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Police/School Liaison Officer Contract Page 1 RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This is a contract between Richfield Public Schools District 280 and the City of Richfield, Department of Public Safety for the services of Police/School Liaison Officers for July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2021 unless terminated earlier. For this renewal period and each fiscal year thereafter, no less than $52,107 shall be paid to the City for services rendered. This dollar amount is based on the safe school levy certification as established by the Department of Education for the 2001-02 fiscal year. The renewal contract dollar amount shall be adjusted annually at the end of each school year to reflect a maximum annual compensation of $76,730 in 2017-18, $78,265 in 2018-19, $79,830 in 2019-20, and $81,427 in fiscal year 2020-21. INTRODUCTION The mission of the Richfield Public Schools is to help prepare all learners for a changing world by developing their knowledge and abilities within a climate of mutual trust and respect. We believe that quality education is a home, school, and community partnership. Therefore, our relationship with the Department of Public Safety and the City of Richfield is very important as we all work together in partnership to provide a safe, supportive and caring educational environment. PRIMARY DUTIES The primary duties of the Police/School Liaison Officers will be to participate in crime prevention activities such as developing youth assets and creating positive relationships with the youth of our community and to investigate juvenile criminal activity. The officers will not be responsible for enforcing school rules or for school security. Generally, juvenile criminal matters occurring on school property or at school events will be handled by the officers. Most juvenile cases will be handled by these officers. In addition, the school liaison officers will provide law enforcement education, crime and drug abuse prevention, and safety programs. The Police/School Liaison Officers are employees of the City and work under City and Public Safety policies and procedures. Each Police/School Liaison Officer Contract Page 2 officer will be provided with an office at the school to which the officer is primarily assigned. PERSONNEL Two officers will be provided to the school district. One will be assigned to the Senior High School and the other to the Middle School. Both officers will work with the other schools in the district as necessary. Whenever possible, if one officer is absent, the other officer will be available district- wide as needed. The selection process for the placement of school liaison officers shall include the participation and consider the preference of the school principal. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services to be provided by the Police/School Liaison Officers are the following: 1. Promote the safety and welfare of students by working with the administrators and staff of the District’s Middle and Senior High Schools in the prevention of delinquency and the investigation of criminal or delinquent conduct. 2. Encourage positive attitudes toward the law, law enforcement and the responsible exercise of authority. 3. Deter crime, delinquency, child abuse, and neglect and assist school administration in determining the proper course of action when physical violence, disorder, or similar problems involving the school population arise. 4. Maintain awareness of all criminal or delinquency investigations or interrogations being done in the schools and, when necessary, assist other officers in the performance of their duties. 5. Perform investigations of incidents occurring in the schools, and make proper referrals of petitions to court as serious matters may require. 6. Advise school administration on matters relating to school building security and occupant safety. 7. Participate in community and school efforts to promote positive youth development. Police/School Liaison Officer Contract Page 3 8. Participate in appropriate training opportunities provided to school district staff. 9. To the extent possible and consistent with other responsibilities, the police liaison officers will wear appropriate attire (civilian or uniform) while working in the public schools. 10. Provide speakers on age appropriate subjects to present to Middle School students as requested by the Middle School Principal. 11. Perform other duties and assume other responsibilities as may be agreed to between the Director of Public Safety and the building Principals. DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE The performance of this contract shall be supervised by the Superintendent of Schools and the City Manager or designee. Direct supervision of the officers is the sole responsibility of the Public Safety Director, Building principals will be consulted so as to ensure the appropriate educational climate. EVALUATION The Director of Public Safety and Building Principals shall conduct an evaluation of the School Liaison Officers prior to June 30 of each year, based on services provided during the previous twelve (12) months in relation to the Description of Services specified in the contract. A copy of the written evaluation report will be provided to the Superintendent of Schools and City Manager. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES The SRO assigned to the School District is an employee of the City and shall not be considered an employee of the School District. The SRO shall be subject to the departmental control, supervision, policies, procedures, and General Orders of the Police Department. At all times, the SRO shall be considered law enforcement for the purposes where the law requires school districts to make referrals to law enforcement. It is agreed that nothing contained herein is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing a partnership or joint venture between the Parties. Any and all acts that either Party or their personnel, Police/School Liaison Officer Contract Page 4 employees, agents, contractors, or servants, perform pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be undertaken as independent contractors and not as employees of the other. The Parties shall, except as provided herein, act in their individual capacities and not as agents, employees, partners, joint ventures or associates of the other. None of the Parties nor its personnel, employees, agents, contractors, or servants shall be entitled to any benefits of the other. The Parties shall not provide any insurance coverage to the other or their employees including, but not limited to, workers’ compensation insurance. Each Party shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due to its employees and shall be responsible for all reports, obligations, and payments pertaining to social security taxation, income tax withholding, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, group insurance coverage, collective bargaining agreements or any other such similar matters. Any and all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment, including without limitation claims of discrimination against a Party its officers, employees, agents, contractors or servants shall in no way be the responsibility of the other Party. Neither Party shall have any authority to bind the other by or with any contract or agreement, nor to impose any liability upon the other. All acts and contracts of each shall be in its own name and not in the name of the other unless otherwise provided herein. ACCESS TO EDUCATION RECORDS Public Data: School officials shall allow SROs to inspect and copy any public records maintained by the school to the extent allowed by law. Private Educational Data: If some information in a student’s record is needed in an emergency to protect the health or safety of the student or other individuals, school officials shall disclose to the SRO that information which is needed to respond to the emergency situation based on the seriousness of the threat to someone’s health or safety; the need of the information to meet the emergency situation and the extent to which time is of the essence. If student record information is needed by an SRO, but no emergency situation exists, the information may be released only as allowed by law. The officers, the City and the School District are subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. LEGAL CONTINGENCIES Police/School Liaison Officer Contract Page 5 Nondiscrimination. Both parties agree that they will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance of this Agreement with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of the race, color, religion, sex, disability, or national origin or similarly protected status of the employee or applicant. Neither of the parties shall, in the performance of this Agreement, discriminate or permit discrimination in violation of federal or state laws or local ordinances. Captions. Captions used in this Agreement are for convenience and are not used in the construction of this Agreement. Applicable Law. The parties to this Agreement shall conform with all existing and applicable city ordinances, resolutions, state and local laws, federal laws, and all existing and applicable rules and regulations. Minnesota law will govern the terms and the performance under this Agreement Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties. No representations were made or relied upon by either party other than those that are expressly set forth herein. No agent, employee, or other representative of either party is empowered to alter any of the terms hereof except as provided herein. Amendment. This Agreement may be modified only by written amendment duly executed by authorized officials of the parties. No alteration or variation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. Every amendment shall specify the date on which its provisions shall be effective. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or otherwise unenforceable, that provision will be severed and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute which, in the judgment of any party to this Agreement, may affect the performance of such party shall be reduced to writing and delivered to the other party. As soon as possible thereafter, the parties' authorized representatives shall schedule a face to face meeting to resolve the dispute in a mutually satisfactory manner. Prior to the institution of any formal legal proceeding, the parties must meet in this manner to attempt to resolve the dispute. This meeting must take place within ten (10) business days after service of the written statement of dispute. During the pendency of negotiations, the parties shall act in good faith to perform their respective duties described herein. Police/School Liaison Officer Contract Page 6 Indemnification. Each party will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party from any and all liability, expense, cost, attorney fees, claim, judgment, suit and/or cause of action (whether or not meritorious), settlement or demand for personal injury, death or damage to tangible property which may accrue against the other party to the extent it is caused by the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the indemnifying party, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors while performing its duties under this Agreement, provided that the other party gives the indemnifying party prompt, written notice of any such claim, suit, demand or cause of action. The other party shall cooperate in the defense or settlement negotiation of such claim, suit, demand or cause of action. The provisions of this section shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. These Indemnification provisions are not intended to waive a Party’s sovereign immunity. Each Party’s liability is governed by and limited to the extent provided by Minnesota law. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is not intended to, nor shall it, provide third parties with any remedy, claim, liability, reimbursement, cause of action or other right or privilege, except that this Agreement’s indemnification provision shall also inure to the benefit of a party’s employees, officers, agents, and servants. TERMINATION This contract may be canceled by either party at any time, with or without cause, upon a 30-day written notice. _____________________________ _____________________________ Steven Unowsky Steven L. Devich Superintendent of Schools City Manager Richfield Public School District 280 City of Richfield 7001 Harriet Avenue South 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Richfield, MN 55423 Date Date AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.S. STAFF REPORT NO. 139 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J enni fer A nderson, S upport S ervices Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 9/6/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: Mary Ti etjen, C ity A ttorney C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the revocation of the H U B Dairy Queen food establishment license due to non- payment of state taxes. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The City of Richfield was notified that on August 18, 2017, the Minnesota Department of Revenue served a W rit of Entry on the HUB Dairy Queen, seizing assets and c losed the business due to delinquent state taxes. As a result, the Department of Revenue subsequently notified the City that it was required to revoke the establishment's food lic ense and that it must notify the lic ense holder within 10 days of the potential revoc ation. Pursuant to C ity Code, the City gave written notice to the licensee informing it of the impending lic ense revocation and the right to a hearing. The business did not request a hearing. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: R evoke the food establishment license of the H U B Dairy Queen located at 16 E. 66th Street, Richfield, MN. 55423 B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The C ity of Ric hfield first became aware of the delinquent state taxes when it was notified by the Minnesota Department of Revenue on August 18, 2017. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): City C ode subsec tion 617.23 subd. 2 states violation of state law is grounds for revocation of the license. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: N/A D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Other than the loss of license fees, there is no financ ial impact. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : N/A ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Per the State of Minnesota, the City of Richfield must revoke the license due to non-payment of state taxes. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Notice of L icense Revocation for debt C over Memo AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.T. STAFF REPORT NO. 140 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ared Voto, E xecutive A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich 9/5/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the reappointment of Jack W old as a youth member of the Transportation Commission for a term of September 1, 2017 to August 31, 2018. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Terms of City advisory commission y outh members expired on August 31, 2017. Advisory commission terms for y outh members are for one y ear. I n the past, City staff has asked youth members if they would like to be reappointed to the same board or commission and, if so, reappointed them without going through the formal rec ruitment and interview process. This year, one y outh member responded to this inquiry and requested reappointment. The City Manager ’s Offic e is c urrently conducting its annual rec ruitment seeking applic ants to fill the other youth member vacanc ies and consideration of those appointments will be brought to a future C ity Council meeting. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By Motion: R eappoint Jack W old as a youth member of the Transportation Commission for a term of September 1, 2017 to August 31, 2018. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT This information is c ontained in the Exec utive Summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): City advisory c ommissions were established by City ordinance or resolution. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: All terms of C ity advisory commission youth members expired on A ugust 31, 2017. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : N/A ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The C ity Council may c hoose to defer the reappointment to a future City C ounc il meeting. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AGENDA SECTION:CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA ITEM #7.U. STAFF REPORT NO. 141 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ared Voto, E xecutive A ide/A nalyst D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the appointment of Derek Sandbeck to the Arts Commission with a term expiring January 31, 2020. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: This summer, two members of the Arts Commission submitted their resignations to the staff liaison due to moving out of the area and schedule changes that did not allow them to attend C ommission meetings. City staff reached out to two applic ants who indicated a preferenc e for the Arts C ommission during the application process held in December 2016, to see if they were interested in filling the vacanc ies, as we had done earlier this y ear. One applic ant responded and stated his continued interest in serving on the Arts Commission. Sinc e the Arts Commission c urrently has two vac ancies out of seven adult members, staff proposes filling one vacanc y now with the interested applic ant. The other spot will remain vacant until the next appointment process, beginning in D ec ember 2017. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Appoint D erek Sandbeck to fill a vacancy on the Arts Commission with a term expiring January 31, 2020. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT This information is c ontained in the Exec utive Summary. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): City advisory c ommissions were established by City ordinance or resolution. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Appointment should be made at the S eptember 12, 2017 City Council meeting so the new member may participate at the next c ommission meeting. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: N/A E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : None ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AGENDA SECTION:PROPOSED ORDINANCES AGENDA ITEM #9. STAFF REPORT NO. 142 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J eff P earson, C ity E ngineer D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: K ristin A sher, P ublic Works D irector 9/5/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the second reading of an ordinance amending City Code Section 802 related to small cell wireless installation in the City right-of-way and approval of a resolution authorizing summary publication. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: Legislation was passed in 2017 that established statewide requirements for cities to allow wireless c ompanies to install small c ell facility networks in the public right-of-way. The small cell fac ility networks are c ommonly known as "small c ell wireless" equipment and distributed antenna sy stems. Although the legislation limits many actions the City c an take on c ontrolling the plac ement of the small cell facilities in the public right-of-way, it does allow for the City to enact a permitting proc ess for the facilities. The proposed amendments to the c urrent right-of-way ordinance provide additional controls and management if small cell wireless companies choose Richfield as an installation site. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve the second reading of an ordinance amending City C ode Section 802 related to small cell wireless installation in the City right-of-way and approve a resolution authoriz ing summary publication. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT W ireless and cellular service providers are looking for solutions to providing better and more reliable servic e to customers. One method of enhancing service is to install "Small Cell" antennas to fill in areas of poor coverage. To date, applic ations for these small c ell devic es have been submitted by third parties whic h are not recognized as telecommunication companies and lease the antennas to providers. Legislation was passed that allows these antennas to be installed in the right-of-way. The C ity of Ric hfield and other cities passed resolutions stating their opposition to the legislation. City C ounc il passed the resolution at the March 16, 2017 Meeting. The ability for the City to c ontrol its right-of-way and negotiate use and fees from utility companies for that public asset c urrently exists. Updates to the existing right-of-way ordinanc e will allow the City to establish a permitting process for the installation of the small cell fac ilities when proposed within public rights-of-way. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Sec tion 802 of Richfield City Code depic ts the City 's current practic es of permitting the use within right-of-ways, whic h includes permitting for exc avation, obstruc tion, and installation. Minnesota Statutes, Section 237.162 defines public right-of-way inc luding management of standards and costs. Minnesota Statutes Sec tions 237.16, 237.162, 237.163, 237.79, 237.81, and 238.086 (the "Act") and 2017 Session Laws, Chapter 94 amending the Ac t are interpreted with c onsideration of small cell wireless tec hnology. The C ity Charter requires a first and second reading of ordinances. A public hearing us not requires unless a separate statute, charter provision, or ordinanc e requires it. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: The state legislation is officially passed and the C ity is not allowed to have a moratorium to further disc uss the proc ess. The C ity has 90 days to review and approve/deny any small cell applic ation. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: There is no financial impac t in approving the ordinance. The C ity is allowed to c harge fees for the permit review as well as c harge rent for fac ilities located on C ity owned facilities (light poles). E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney has reviewed the ordinanc e amendment and will be available to answer questions. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): None P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution Resolution L etter P roposed Ordinance Ordinance RESOLUTION NO. _______ RESOLUTION APPROVING SUMMARY PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 802 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE PERTAINING TO THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY AND SMALL CELL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES WHEREAS, the City has adopted the above referenced amendment to the Richfield City Code; and WHEREAS, the verbatim text of the ordinance is cumbersome, and the expense of publication of the complete text is not justified. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield that the following summary is hereby approved for official publication: SUMMARY PUBLICATION BILL NO. 2017-_____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 802 OF THE RICHFIELD CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY AND SMALL CELL WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES On September 12, 2017, the Richfield City Council adopted an ordinance designated as Bill No. 2017-____, the title of which is stated above. This summary of the ordinance is published pursuant to Section 3.12 of the Richfield City Charter. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and to ensure the integrity of its streets and the appropriate use of the rights-of- way, the City strives to keep its rights-of-way in a state of good repair and free from unnecessary encumbrances. Amendments to the ordinance further the control of the placement of small cell facilities in the public right-of-way. The ordinance allows the City to enact a permitting process for the installation of the facilities with additional controls and management to maintain the purpose of the ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is directed to keep a copy of the Ordinance in her office at City Hall for public inspection during normal business hours and to post a full copy of the Ordinance in a public place in the City for a period of two weeks. Copies of the ordinance are also available upon request by calling the Public Works Department at (612) 861-9170. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 12th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk BILL NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 802 OF THE RICHFIELD CODE OF ORDINANCES ADDING NEW REGULATIONS FOR SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITY INSTALLATION THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Subsection 802 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Richfield is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 802.01. - Findings, purpose, and intent. To provide for the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and to ensure the integrity of its streets and the appropriate use of the rights-of-way, the City strives to keep its rights-of-way in a state of good repair and free from unnecessary encumbrances. Accordingly, the City enacts this Section of this code relating to right-of-way permits and administration. This Section imposes reasonable regulation on the placement and maintenance of facilities and equipment currently within the City's rights-of-way or to be placed therein at some future time. It is intended to complement the regulatory roles of state and federal agencies. Under this Section, persons excavating and obstructing the rights-of-way will bear financial responsibility for their work through the recovery of out- of-pocket and projected costs from persons using the public rights-of-way. This Section shall be interpreted consistently with 1997 Session Laws, Chapter 123, substantially codified in Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.16, 237.162, 237.163, 237.79, 237.81, and 238.086 (the "Act") and 2017 Session Laws, Chapter 94 amending the Act and the other laws governing applicable rights of the City and users of the right-of-way. This Section shall also be interpreted consistent with Minnesota Rules 7819.0050 - 7819.9950 where possible. To the extent that any provision of this Section cannot be interpreted consistently with the Minnesota Rules, the interpretation most consistent with the Act and other applicable statutory and case law is intended. 802.03. - Election to manage the public rights-of-way. Pursuant to the authority granted to the City under state and federal statutory, administrative and common law, the City elects pursuant Minnesota Statutes, section 237.163, subdivision 2(b), to manage rights-of-way within its jurisdiction. 802.05. - Definitions. The following definitions apply in this Section of this code. References to "subdivisions" are unless otherwise specified references to subdivisions in this Section: Subdivision 1. Abandoned facility. "Abandoned facility" means a facility no longer in service or physically disconnected from a portion of the operating facility, or from any other facility, that is in use or still carries service. A facility is not abandoned unless declared so by the right-of-way user. Abandoned facilities should be removed and not left in place. Subd. 2. Applicant. "Applicant" means any person requesting permission to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way. Subd. 3. City. "City" means the City of Richfield, Minnesota. For purposes of Section 802.57, City means its elected officials, officers, employees and agents. Subd. 4. Collocate or Collocation. To install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure or utility pole that is owned privately, or by the city or other governmental unit. Subd. 5. Commission. "Commission" means the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. Subd. 6. Congested Right-of-Way. "Congested Right-of-Way" means a crowded condition in the subsurface of the public right-of-way that occurs when the maximum lateral spacing between existing underground facilities does not allow for construction of new underground facilities without using hand digging to expose the existing lateral facilities in conformance with Minnesota Statutes, section 216D.04. subdivision 3, over a continuous length in excess of 500 feet. Subd. 7. Construction Performance Bond. "Construction Performance Bond" means any of the following forms of security provided at permittee's option: (a) Individual project bond, including a "license and permit" bond; (b) Cash deposit; (c) Security of a form listed or approved under Minnesota Statutes, section. 15.73, subdivision; (d) Letter of Credit, in a form acceptable to the City; (e) Self-insurance, in a form acceptable to the City; (f) A blanket bond for projects within the City, or other form of construction bond, for a time specified and in a form acceptable to the City. Subd. 8. Degradation. "Degradation" means a decrease in the useful life of the right-of-way caused by excavation in or disturbance of the right-of-way, resulting in the need to reconstruct such right- of-way earlier than would be required if the excavation or disturbance did not occur. Subd. 9. Degradation Cost. "Degradation Cost" subject to Minnesota Rules 7819.1100 means the cost to achieve a level of restoration as determined by the City at the time the permit is issued, not to exceed the maximum restoration shown in plates 1 to 13, set forth in Minnesota Rules parts 7819.9900 to 7819.9950. Subd. 10. Degradation Fee. "Degradation Fee" means the estimated fee established at the time of permitting by the City to recover costs associated with the decrease in the useful life of the right-of-way caused by the excavation, and which equals the degradation cost. Subd. 11. Department. "Department" means the Department of Public Works of the City. Subd. 12. Department Inspector. "Department Inspector" means any person authorized by the City to carry out inspections related to the provisions of this Section. Subd. 13. Director. "Director" means the Director of the Department of Public Works of the City, or her or his designee. Subd. 14. Delay penalty. "Delay penalty" is the penalty imposed as a result of unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration as established by permit. Subd. 15. Emergency. "Emergency" means a condition that: (1) Poses a danger to life or health, or of a significant loss of property; or (2) Requires immediate repair or replacement of facilities in order to restore service to a customer. Subd. 16. Equipment. "Equipment" means any tangible asset used to install, repair, or maintain facilities in any right-of-way. Subd. 17. Excavate. "Excavate" means to dig into or in any way remove or physically disturb or penetrate any part of a right-of-way. Subd. 18. Excavation permit. "Excavation permit" means the permit which, pursuant to this Section, must be obtained before a person may excavate in a right-of-way. An excavation permit allows the holder to excavate that part of the right-of-way described in such permit. Subd. 19. Excavation permit fee. "Excavation permit fee" means money paid to the City by an applicant to cover the costs as provided in Section 802.23. Subd. 20. Facility or facilities. "Facility or facilities" means tangible asset in the public right-of- way required to provide utility service. The term does not include Facilities to the extent the location and relocation of such Facilities are preempted by Minnesota Statutes, section 161.45, governing utility facility placement in state trunk highways. Subd. 21. Five-year project plan. "Five-year project plan" shows projects adopted by the City for construction within the next five (5) years. Subd. 22. High density corridor. "High density corridor" means a designated portion of the public right-of-way within which telecommunications right-of-way users having multiple and competing facilities may be required to build and install facilities in a common conduit system or other common structure. Subd. 23. Hole. "Hole" means an excavation in the right-of-way, with the excavation having a length less than the width of the pavement or adjacent pavement. Subd. 24. Local representative. "Local representative" means a local person or persons, or designee of such person or persons, authorized by a registrant to accept service and to make decisions for that registrant regarding all matters within the scope of this Section. Subd. 25. Management costs. "Management costs" means the actual costs the City incurs in managing its rights-of-way, including such costs, if incurred, as those associated with registering applicants; issuing, processing, and verifying right-of-way or small wireless facility permit applications; inspecting job sites and restoration projects; maintaining, supporting, protecting, or moving user facilities during right-of-way work; determining the adequacy of right-of-way restoration; restoring work inadequately performed after providing notice and the opportunity to correct the work; and revoking right-of-way or small wireless facility permits. Management costs do not include payment by a telecommunications right-of-way user for the use of the right-of-way, unreasonable fees of a third-party contractor used by the city including fees tied to or based on customer counts, access lines, or revenues generated by the right-of-way or for the city, the fees and cost of litigation relating to the interpretation of Minnesota Session Laws 1997, chapter 123; Minnesota Statutes, sections 237.162 or 237.163 or any ordinance enacted under those sections, or the City fees and costs related to appeals taken pursuant to Section 802.61. Subd. 26. Obstruct. "Obstruct" means to place any tangible object in a right-of-way so as to hinder free and open passage over that or any part of the right-of-way. Subd. 27. Obstruction permit. "Obstruction permit" means the permit which, pursuant to this Section, must be obtained before a person may obstruct a right-of-way, allowing the holder to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of that right-of-way, for the duration specified therein, including a blanket permit for a period of time and for types of work specified by the Director, if deemed appropriate in his or her discretion. Subd. 28. Obstruction Permit fee. "Obstruction permit fee" means money paid to the City by a permittee to cover the costs as provided in Section 802.23. Subd. 29. Patch or patching. "Patch or patching" means a method of pavement replacement that is temporary in nature. A patch consists of (1) the compaction of the subbase and aggregate base, and (2) the replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement for a minimum of two (2) feet beyond the edges of the excavation in all directions. A patch is considered full restoration only when the pavement is included in the City's five (5) year project plan. Subd. 30. Pavement. "Pavement" means any type of improved surface that is within the public right-of-way and that is paved or otherwise constructed with paver blocks, bituminous, concrete, aggregate, or gravel. Subd. 31. Permit. "Permit" has the meaning given "right-of-way permit" in Minnesota Statutes, section 237.162. Subd. 32. Permittee. "Permittee" means any person to whom a permit to excavate or obstruct a right-of-way has been granted by the City under this Section. Subd. 33. Person. "Person" means an individual or entity subject to the laws and rules of this state, however organized, whether public or private, whether domestic or foreign, whether for profit or nonprofit, and whether natural, corporate, or political. Subd. 34. Public right-of-way. "Public right-of-way" has the meaning given it in Minnesota Statutes, section 237.162, subdivision 3. Subd. 35. Registrant. "Registrant" means any person who (1) has or seeks to have its equipment or facilities located in any right-of-way, or (2) in any way occupies or uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right-of-way or place its facilities or equipment in the right-of-way Subd. 36. Restore or restoration. "Restore or restoration" means the process by which an excavated right-of-way and surrounding area, including pavement and foundation, is returned to the same condition and life expectancy that existed before excavation. Subd. 37. Right-of-way permit. "Right-of-way permit" means either the excavation permit or the obstruction permit, or both, depending on the context, required by this Section. Subd. 38. Right-of-way user. "Right-of-way user" means (1) a telecommunications right-of-way user as defined by Minnesota Statutes, section 237.162, subdivision 4; or (2) a person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way that is used or intended to be used for providing utility service, and who has a right under law, franchise, or ordinance to use the public right-of-way. Subd. 39. Service or Utility Service. "Service or Utility Service" means and includes: (1) Services provided by a public utility as defined in Minnesota Statutes 216B.02, subdivisions 4 and 6; (2) Services of a telecommunications right-of-way user, including transporting of voice or data information; (3) Services of a cable communications system as defined in Minnesota Statutes, chapter. 238.02, subdivision 3; (4) Natural gas or electric energy or telecommunications services provided by a local government unit; (5) Services provided by a cooperative electric association organized under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 308A; and (6) Water, sewer, steam, cooling or heating services. Subd. 40. Small Wireless Facility. A wireless facility that meets both of the following qualifications: (i) each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or could fit within such an enclosure; and (ii) all other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility provided such equipment is, in aggregate, no more than 28 cubic feet in volume, not including electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment. Subd. 41. Supplemental Application. "Supplemental Application" means an application made to excavate or obstruct more of the right-of-way than allowed in, or to extend, a permit that had already been issued. Subd. 42. Temporary Surface. "Temporary Surface" means the compaction of subbase and aggregate base and replacement, in kind, of the existing pavement only to the edges of the excavation. It is temporary in nature except when the replacement is of pavement included in the City's two-year plan, in which case it is considered full restoration. Subd. 43. Trench. "Trench" means an excavation in the right-of-way, with the excavation having a length equal to or greater than the width of the pavement or adjacent pavement. Subd. 44. Telecommunication right-of-way User. "Telecommunication right-of-way User" means a person owning or controlling a facility in the right-of-way, or seeking to own or control a Facility in the right-of-way, that is used or is intended to be used for providing wireless service, or transporting telecommunication or other voice or data information. For purposes of this Section, a cable communication system defined and regulated under Minn. Stat. Chap. 238, and telecommunication activities related to providing natural gas or electric energy services, by a public utility as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 216B.02, a municipality, a municipal gas or power agency organized under Minnesota Statutes, chapters 453 and 453A, or a cooperative electric association organized under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 308A, are not telecommunications right-of-way users for purposes of this Section except to the extent such entity is offering wireless service. Subd. 45. Two Year Project Plan. "Two Year Project Plan" shows projects adopted by the City for construction within the next two (2) years. Subd. 46. Utility Pole. A pole that is used in whole or in part to facilitate telecommunications or electric service. Subd. 47. Wireless Facility. Equipment at a fixed location that enables the provision of wireless services between user equipment and a wireless service network, including equipment associated with wireless service, a radio transceiver, antenna, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and a small wireless facility, but not including wireless support structures, wireline backhaul facilities, or cables between utility poles or wireless support structures, or not otherwise immediately adjacent to and directly associated with a specific antenna. Subd. 48. Wireless Service. Any service using licensed or unlicensed wireless spectrum, including the use of Wi-Fi, whether at a fixed location or by means of a mobile device, that is provided using wireless facilities. Wireless service does not include services regulated under Title VI of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, including cable service. Subd. 49. Wireless Support Structure. A new or existing structure in a right-of-way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, as reasonably determined by the city. 802.07. - Administration. The Public Works Director (“Director”) is the principal City official responsible for the administration of the rights-of-way, right-of-way permits, and the ordinances related thereto. The Director may delegate any or all of the duties hereunder. 802.09. - Utility Coordination Committee. The City may create an advisory utility coordination committee. Participation on the committee is voluntary. It will be composed of any registrants that wish to assist the City in obtaining information and by making recommendations regarding use of the right-of-way, and to improve the process of performing construction work therein. The City may determine the size of such committee and shall appoint members from a list of registrants that have expressed a desire to assist the City. 802.11. - Registration and right-of-way occupancy. Subdivision 1. Registration. Each person who occupies, uses, or seeks to occupy or use, the right-of-way or place any equipment or facilities in or on the right-of-way, including persons with installation and maintenance responsibilities by lease, sublease or assignment, must register with the City. Registration will consist of providing application information and paying a registration fee. Subd. 2. Registration prior to work. No person may construct, install, repair, remove, relocate, or perform any other work on, or use any facilities or any part thereof in any right-of-way without first being registered with the City. Subd. 3. Exceptions. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to repeal or amend the provisions of a City ordinance establishing the rights of and limitations placed on persons to plant or maintain boulevard plantings or gardens in the area of the right-of-way between their property and the street curb. Persons shall not be deemed to use or occupy the right-of-way, and shall not be required to obtain any permits or satisfy any other requirements under this Section for the following: (a) Planting or maintaining boulevard plantings or gardens (City Code 811.07); (b) Other surface landscaping works (City Code 811.07); (c) Construction and maintenance of driveways, sidewalks, curb and gutter, or parking lots, except repairs or restoration necessitated by utility cuts or other work (City Code 800.11); (d) Construction or maintenance of street furnishings, bus stop benches, shelters, or posts and pillars (City Code 805.07); (e) Snow removal activities (City Code 930.17); (f) Construction and maintenance of irrigation systems provided that the system does not connect directly to water mains in the right-of-way (City Code 811.07). Subd. 4. Gopher one call. Nothing herein relieves a person from complying with the provisions of the Minnesota Statutes, chapter 216D, Gopher One Call Law. 802.13. - Registration information. Subdivision 1. Information required. The information provided to the City at the time of registration shall include, but not be limited to: (a) Each registrant's name, Gopher One-Call facility owner code number or other One-Call identifier, address and e-mail address, and telephone and facsimile numbers. (b) The name, address and e-mail address, if applicable, and telephone and facsimile numbers of a local representative. The local representative or designee shall be accessible for consultation at all times. Current information regarding how to contact the local representative in an emergency shall be provided at the time of registration. (c) A certificate of insurance or self-insurance: (1) Verifying that an insurance policy has been issued to the registrant by an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota, or a form of self insurance acceptable to the City; (2) Verifying that the registrant is insured against claims for personal injury, including death, as well as claims for property damage arising out of the (i) use and occupancy of the right-of-way by the registrant, its officers, agents, employees and permittees, and (ii) placement and use of facilities and equipment in the right-of-way by the registrant, its officers, agents, employees and permittees, including, but not limited to, protection against liability arising from completed operations, damage of underground facilities and collapse of property; (3) Either naming the City as an additional insured as to whom the coverages required herein are in force and applicable and for whom defense will be provided as to all such coverages or otherwise providing evidence satisfactory to the Director that the City is fully covered and will be defended through registrant's insurance for all actions included in Minnesota Rule part 7819.1250; (4) Requiring that the City be notified 30 days in advance of cancellation of the policy or material modification of a coverage term; (5) Indicating comprehensive liability coverage, automobile liability coverage, workers compensation and umbrella coverage established by the City in amounts sufficient to protect the City and the public and to carry out the purposes and policies of this Section. (d) The City may require a copy of the actual insurance policies if necessary to ensure the Director that the policy provides adequate third party claim coverage and City indemnity and defense coverage for all actions included in the indemnity required by Minnesota Rule part 7819.1250. (e) Such evidence as the Director may require that the person is authorized to do business in Minnesota. Subd. 2. Notice of Changes. The registrant shall keep all of the information listed above current at all times by providing to the City information as to changes within 15 days following the date on which the registrant has knowledge of any change. 802.15. - Reporting obligations. Subdivision 1. Operations. Each registrant shall, at the time of registration and by December 1 of each year, file a construction and major maintenance plan for underground facilities with the City. Such plan shall be submitted using a format designated by the City and shall contain the information determined by the City to be necessary to facilitate the coordination and reduction in the frequency of excavations and obstructions of rights-of-way. If by December 1 the registrant has not developed its construction and maintenance information for the coming year, the registrant shall file such information with the City thereafter as soon as it is developed. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: (a) The locations and the estimated beginning and ending dates of all projects to be commenced during the next calendar year (in this section, a "next-year project"); and (b) To the extent known, the tentative locations and estimated beginning and ending dates for all projects contemplated for the five (5) years following the next calendar year (in this section, a "five-year project"). The term "project" in this section shall include both next-year projects and five-year projects. By January 1 of each year and subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act the City will have available for inspection in the City's office a composite list of all projects of which the City has been informed of the annual plans. All registrants are responsible for keeping themselves informed of the current status of this list. Thereafter, by March 1, each registrant may change any project in its list of next-year projects, and must notify the City and all other registrants of all such changes in said list. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a registrant may at any time join in a next-year project of another registrant listed by the other registrant. Subd. 2. Additional next-year projects. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City will not deny an application for a right-of-way permit for failure to include a project in a plan submitted to the City if the registrant has used commercially reasonable efforts to anticipate and plan for the project. 802.17. - Permit Requirement. Subdivision 1. Permit required. Except as otherwise provided in this code, no person may obstruct or excavate any right-of-way, or install or place facilities in the right-of-way, without first having obtained the appropriate right-of-way permit from the City to do so. (a) Excavation permit. An excavation permit is required by a registrant to excavate that part of the right-of-way described in such permit and to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of the right-of-way by placing facilities described therein, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. (b) Obstruction permit. An obstruction permit is required by a registrant to hinder free and open passage over the specified portion of the right-of-way by placing equipment described therein on the right-of-way, to the extent and for the duration specified therein. An obstruction permit is not required if a person already possesses a valid excavation permit for the same project. (c) Permits for installation, repair or otherwise work on above-ground facilities within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 237.163, subd. 6(b)(4) will be obstruction permits, notwithstanding the need for excavation, provided the excavation is augered or hand dug for the purpose of placing a pole type structure. (d) Small Wireless Facility Permit. A small wireless facility permit is required by a registrant to erect or install a wireless support structure, to collocate a small wireless facility, or to otherwise install a small wireless facility in the specified portion of the right-of-way, to the extent specified therein, provided that such permit shall remain in effect for the length of time the facility is in use, unless lawfully revoked. Subd. 2. Permit Extensions. No person may excavate or obstruct the right-of-way beyond the date or dates specified in the permit unless (i) such person makes a supplementary application for another right-of-way permit before the expiration of the initial permit, and (ii) a new permit or permit extension is granted. Subd. 3. Delay Penalty. In accordance with Minnesota Rule 7819.1000 subp. 3, the City shall establish and impose a delay penalty for unreasonable delays in right-of-way excavation, obstruction, patching, or restoration. The delay penalty shall be established from time to time by City Council resolution. A delay penalty will not be imposed for delays due to force majeure, including inclement weather, civil strife, acts of God, or other circumstances beyond the control of the applicant. Subd. 4. Permit Display. Permits issued under this Section shall be conspicuously displayed or otherwise available at all times at the indicated work site and shall be available for inspection by the City. Subd. 5. Routine Obstruction and Excavation. The Director may approve a permit plan which, among other conditions, allows for routine excavations and obstructions without separate notice and separate compensation for such projects. Projects that do not involve excavation of paved surface and that last less than eight (8) hours in duration may be included in such a plan. 802.19. - Permit Applications. Subdivision 1. Content of Permit. Application for a permit is made to the City. Right-of-way permit applications shall contain, and will be considered complete only upon compliance with the requirements of the following provisions: (a) Registration with the City pursuant to this Section; (b) Submission of a completed permit application form, including all required attachments, and scaled drawings showing the location and area of the proposed project and the location of all known existing and proposed facilities owned or operated by the applicant. (c) Payment of money due the City for: (1) Permit fees, estimated restoration costs and other management costs; (2) Prior obstructions or excavations; (3) Any undisputed loss, damage, or expense suffered by the City because of applicant's prior excavations or obstructions of the rights-of-way or any emergency actions taken by the City. (d) Payment of disputed amounts due the City by posting security or depositing in an escrow account an amount equal to at least 100% of the amount owing. Posting an additional or larger construction performance bond for additional facilities when applicant requests an excavation permit to install additional facilities and the City deems the existing construction performance bond inadequate under applicable standards. 802.21. - Issuance of Permit; Conditions. Subdivision 1. Permit Issuance. If the Applicant has satisfied the requirements of this Section, the City shall issue a permit within a reasonable period of time of receiving a completed application. Subd. 2. Conditions. The City may impose reasonable conditions upon the issuance of the permit and the performance of the applicant thereunder to protect the health, safety and welfare or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use. In addition, a permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state and federal laws, including but not limited to Minnesota Statutes §§ 216D.01 - .09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System) and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560. Subd. 3. Screening. The Permittee shall screen all above-ground facilities as required by the Director. Screening methods shall include the use of shrubs, trees and/or landscape rock or installation using camouflaged forms of the facility. Subd. 4. Small Wireless Facility Conditions. In addition to subdivisions 2 and 3, the erection or installation of a wireless support structure, the collocation of a small wireless facility, or other installation of a small wireless facility in the right-of-way, shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on the particular wireless support structure, under those attachment specifications, and at the height indicated in the applicable permit application. (b) No new wireless support structure installed within the right-of-way shall exceed 50 feet in height without the city’s written authorization, provided that the city may impose a lower height limit in the applicable permit to protect the public health, safety and welfare or to protect the right-of-way and its current use, and further provided that a registrant may replace an existing wireless support structure exceeding 50 feet in height with a structure of the same height subject to such conditions or requirements as may be imposed in the applicable permit. (c) No wireless facility may extend more than 10 feet above its wireless support structure. (d) Where an applicant proposes to install a new wireless support structure in the right-of- way, the city may impose separation requirements between such structure and any existing wireless support structure or other facilities in and around the right-of-way. (e) Where an applicant proposes collocation on a decorative wireless support structure, sign or other structure not intended to support small wireless facilities, the city may impose reasonable requirements to accommodate the particular design, appearance or intended purpose of such structure. (f) Where an applicant proposes to replace a wireless support structure, the city may impose reasonable restocking, replacement, or relocation requirements on the replacement of such structure. Subd. 5. Small Wireless Facility Agreement. A small wireless facility shall only be collocated on a small wireless support structure owned or controlled by the city, or any other city asset in the right-of- way, after the applicant has executed a standard small wireless facility collocation agreement with the city. The standard collocation agreement may require payment of the following: (a) Up to $150 per year for rent to collocate on the city structure. (b) $25 per year for maintenance associated with the collocation; (c) A monthly fee for electrical service as follows: 1. $73 per radio node less than or equal to 100 maximum watts; 2. $182 per radio node over 100 maximum watts; or 3. The actual costs of electricity, if the actual cost exceed the foregoing. The standard collocation agreement shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the required small wireless facility permit, provided, however, that the applicant shall not be additionally required to obtain a license or franchise in order to collocate. Issuance of a small wireless facility permit does not supersede, alter or affect any then-existing agreement between the city and applicant. 802.22. - Action on Small Wireless Facility Permit Applications. Subd. 1. Deadline for Action. The city shall approve or deny a small wireless facility permit application within 90 days after filing of such application. The small wireless facility permit, and any associated building permit application, shall be deemed approved if the city fails to approve or deny the application within the review periods established in this section. Subd. 2. Consolidated Applications. An applicant may file a consolidated small wireless facility permit application addressing the proposed collocation of up to 15 small wireless facilities, or a greater number if agreed to by the City, provided that all small wireless facilities in the application: (a) are located within a two-mile radius; (b) consist of substantially similar equipment; and (c) are to be placed on similar types of wireless support structures. In rendering a decision on a consolidated permit application, the city may approve some small wireless facilities and deny others, but may not use denial of one or more permits as a basis to deny all small wireless facilities in the application. Subd. 3. Tolling of Deadline. The 90-day deadline for action on a small wireless facility permit application may be tolled if: (a) The city receives applications from one or more applicants seeking approval of permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities within a seven-day period. In such case, the city may extend the deadline for all such applications by 30 days by informing the affected applicants in writing of such extension. (b) The applicant fails to submit all required documents or information and the city provides written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt the application. Upon submission of additional documents or information, the city shall have ten days to notify the applicant in writing of any still-missing information. (c) The city and a small wireless facility applicant agree in writing to toll the review period. 802.23. - Permit Fees. Subdivision 1. Fee schedule and fee allocation. The City's permit fee schedule shall be available to the public and established in advance where reasonably possible. The permit fees shall be designed to recover the City's actual costs incurred in managing the right-of-way and shall be based on an allocation among all users of the right-of-way, including the City. Subd. 2. Excavation Permit Fee. The City shall impose an Excavation permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover the following costs: (a) City management costs. (b) Degradation costs, if applicable. Subd. 3. Obstruction Permit Fee. The City shall impose an obstruction permit fee and shall be in an amount sufficient to recover the City management costs. Subd. 4. Small Wireless Facility Permit Fee. The city shall impose a small wireless facility permit fee in an amount sufficient to recover: (a) management costs, and; (b) Consultant fees, city engineering, make-ready, and construction costs associated with collocation of small wireless facilities. Subd. 5. Payment of permit fees. No permit shall be issued without payment of permit fees, unless approved by the Public Works Director. The City may allow Applicant to pay such fees within 30 days of billing, or on some other payment plan agreed to by the Director at his discretion. Subd. 6. Nonrefundable. Permit fees that were paid for a permit that the City has revoked for a breach as stated in Subdivision 22 are not refundable. Subd. 7. Application to franchises. Unless otherwise agreed to in a franchise, management costs may be charged separately from and in addition to the franchise fees imposed on a right-of-way user in the franchise. 802.25. - Right-of-way patching and restoration. Subdivision 1. Timing. The work to be done under the excavation permit, and the patching and restoration of the right-of-way as required herein, must be completed within the dates specified in the permit, increased by as many days as work could not be done because of circumstances beyond the control of the permittee or when work was prohibited as unseasonal or unreasonable under Subdivision 16. Subd. 2. Patch and restoration. Permittee must patch its own work. The City may choose either to have the permittee restore the surface and subgrading portions of right-of-way or to restore the surface portion of right-of-way itself. (a) City Restoration. If the City restores the surface portion of right-of-way, permittee shall pay the costs thereof within 30 days of billing. If, following such Restoration, the pavement settles due to permittee's improper work, the permittee shall pay to the City, within 30 days of billing, all costs associated with correcting the defective work. (b) Permittee restoration. If the permittee restores the right-of-way itself, it shall at the time of application for an Excavation permit post a construction performance bond in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rule 7819.3000. (c) Degradation fee in lieu of restoration. In lieu of right-of-way restoration, a right-of-way user may elect to pay a degradation fee. However, the right-of-way user shall remain responsible for replacing and compacting the subgrade and aggregate based material in the excavation and the degradation fee shall not include the cost to accomplish these responsibilities. Subd. 3. Standards. The permittee shall perform patching and restoration according to the standards and with the materials specified by the City and shall comply with Minnesota Rule 7819.1100. Subd. 4. Duty to correct defects. The permittee shall correct defects in patching, or restoration performed by permittee or its agents. Upon notification from the City, permittee shall correct all restoration work to the extent necessary, using the method required by the City. Unless otherwise agreed to by the Director, said work shall be completed within 14 calendar days of receipt of the notice from the City, not including days during which work cannot be done because of circumstances constituting force majeure or days when work is prohibited as unseasonal or unreasonable under Subdivision 16. Subd. 5. Failure to restore. If the permittee fails to restore the right-of-way in the manner and to the condition required by the City, or fails to satisfactorily and timely complete all restoration required by the City, the City shall notify the permittee in writing of the specific alleged failure or failures and shall allow the permittee ten (10) days from receipt of said written notice to cure said failure or failures, unless otherwise extended by the Director. In the event the permittee fails to cure, the City may at its option perform the necessary work and permittee shall pay to the City, within 30 days of billing, the cost of restoring the right-of-way. If permittee fails to pay as required, the City may exercise its rights under the construction performance bond. 802.27. - Joint applications. Subdivision 1. Joint application. Registrants may jointly apply for permits to excavate or obstruct the right-of-way at the same place and time. Subd. 2. Shared fees. Registrants who apply for permits for the same obstruction or excavation, which the City does not perform, may share in the payment of the obstruction or excavation permit fee. In order to obtain a joint permit, registrants must agree among themselves as to the portion each will pay and indicate the same on their applications. Subd. 3. With City projects. Registrants who join in a scheduled obstruction or excavation performed by the City, whether or not it is a joint application by two (2) or more registrants or a single application, are not required to pay the excavation or obstruction and degradation portions of the permit fee, but a permit would still be required. 802.29. - Supplementary applications. Subdivision 1. Limitation on area. A right-of-way permit is valid only for the area of the right-of- way specified in the permit. No permittee may do any work outside the area specified in the permit, except as provided herein. Any permittee which determines that an area greater than that specified in the permit must be obstructed or excavated must before working in that greater area: (i) Make application for a permit extension and pay any additional fees required thereby; and (ii) Be granted a new permit or permit extension. Subd. 2. Limitation on dates. A right-of-way permit is valid only for the dates specified in the permit. No permittee may begin its work before the permit start date or, except as provided herein, continue working after the end date. If a permittee does not finish the work by the permit end date, it must apply for a new permit for the additional time it needs, and receive the new permit or an extension of the old permit before working after the end date of the previous permit. May be subject to delay penalties. This supplementary application must be submitted before the permit end date. 802.31. - Other obligations. Subdivision 1. Compliance with other laws. Obtaining a right-of-way permit does not relieve permittee of its duty to obtain all other necessary permits, licenses, and authority and to pay all fees required by the City or other applicable rule, law or regulation. A permittee shall comply with all requirements of local, state and federal laws, including Minn. Stat. 216D.01-.09 (Gopher One Call Excavation Notice System). A permittee shall perform all work in conformance with all applicable codes and established rules and regulations, and is responsible for all work done in the right-of-way pursuant to its permit, regardless of who does the work. Subd. 2. Prohibited work. Except in an emergency, or with the approval of the City, no right-of- way obstruction or excavation may be done when seasonally prohibited or when conditions are unreasonable for such work. Subd. 3. Interference with right-of-way. A permittee shall not so obstruct a right-of-way that the natural free and clear passage of water through the gutters or other waterways shall be interfered with, unless otherwise approved by the Director. Private vehicles of those doing work in the right-of-way may not be parked within or next to a permit area, unless parked in conformance with City parking regulations. The loading or unloading of trucks must be done solely within the defined permit area unless specifically authorized by the permit. Subd. 4. Traffic control. A permittee shall implement traffic control measures in the area of the work and shall use traffic control procedures in accordance with the most recent manuals on uniform traffic control, traffic control devices and traffic zone layouts published by the State of Minnesota. Subd. 5. Trenchless excavation. As a condition of all applicable permits, permittees employing trenchless excavation methods, including but not limited to Horizontal Directional Drilling, shall follow all requirements set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 216D and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560 and shall require potholing or open cutting over existing underground utilities before excavating, as determined by the Director. 802.33. - Denial of permit. Subd. 1. Reasons for Denial. The City may deny a permit for failure to meet the requirements and conditions of this Section or if the City determines that the denial is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use. Subd. 2. Procedural Requirements. The denial or revocation of a permit must be made in writing and must document the basis for the denial. The City must notify the applicant or right-of-way user in writing within three (3) business days of the decision to deny or revoke a permit. If an application is denied, the right-of-way user may address the reasons for denial identified by the City and resubmit its application. If the application is resubmitted within 30 days of receipt of the notice of denial, no additional application fee shall be imposed. The City must approve or deny the resubmitted application within 30 days after submission. 802.35. - Installation requirements. The excavation, backfilling, patching and restoration, and all other work performed in the right- of-way shall be done in conformance with Minnesota Rules 7819.1100, 78.19.5000 and 7819.5100 and other applicable local requirements, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Minnesota Statutes, sections 237.162 and 237.163. 802.37. - Inspection. Subdivision 1. Notice of Completion. When the work under any permit hereunder is completed, the permittee shall furnish a completion certificate in accordance Minnesota Rule 7819.1300. Subd. 2. Site inspection. Permittee shall make the work-site available to the City and to all others as authorized by law for inspection at all reasonable times during the execution of and upon completion of the work. Subd. 3. Authority of Director. (a) At the time of inspection the Director may order the immediate cessation of any work which poses a serious threat to the life, health, safety or well-being of the public. (b) The Director may issue an order to the permittee to correct any work that does not conform to the terms of the permit or other applicable standards, conditions, or code. If the work failure is a "substantial breach" within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 237.163 subd. 4(c), the order shall state that failure to correct the violation will be cause for revocation of the permit after a specified period determined by the Director. The permittee shall present proof to the Director that the violation has been corrected within the time period set forth by the Director in the order. Such proof shall be provided no later than the next business day following the day of completion. If such proof has not been presented within the required time, the Director may revoke the permit pursuant to Section 802.43. 802.39. - Work done without a permit. Subdivision 1. Emergency situations. Each registrant shall immediately notify the Director of any event regarding its facilities that the registrant considers to be an emergency. The registrant may proceed to take whatever actions are necessary to respond to the emergency. Within two (2) business days after the occurrence of the emergency, unless the Director allows a longer time, the registrant shall apply for the necessary permits, pay the fees associated therewith and fulfill the rest of the requirements necessary to bring itself into compliance with this Section for the actions it took in response to the Emergency. If the Director concludes that a registrant is required to perform work at the facility solely because of an emergency created by another registrant and the work is performed in the immediate area of the emergency work, the Director may waive the permit otherwise required by the registrant(s) called to the emergency created by another party. If the City becomes aware of an emergency regarding a registrant's facilities, the City will attempt to contact the local representative of each registrant affected, or potentially affected, by the emergency. In any event, the City may take whatever action it deems necessary to respond to the emergency, the cost of which shall be borne by the registrant whose facilities occasioned the emergency. Subd. 2. Non-emergency situations. Except in an emergency, any person who, without first having obtained the necessary permit, obstructs or excavates a right-of-way must subsequently obtain a permit, pay an unauthorized work permit fee in an amount established from time to time by the City Council, deposit with the City the fees necessary to correct any damage to the right-of-way and comply with all of the requirements of this Section. 802.41. - Supplementary notification. If the obstruction or excavation of the right-of-way begins later or ends sooner than the date given on the permit, permittee shall notify the City of the accurate information as soon as this information is known. 802.43. - Revocation of permits. Subdivision 1. Substantial breach. The City reserves its right to revoke any right-of-way permit, without a fee refund, if there is a substantial breach of the terms and conditions of any statute, ordinance, rule or regulation, or any material condition of the permit. A substantial breach by permittee shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (a) The violation of any material provision of the right-of-way permit; (b) An evasion or attempt to evade any material provision of the right-of-way permit, or the perpetration or attempt to perpetrate any fraud or deceit upon the City or its citizens; (c) Any material misrepresentation of fact in the application for a right-of-way permit; (d) The failure to complete the work in a timely manner; unless a permit extension is obtained or unless the failure to complete work is due to reasons beyond the permittee's control; or (e) The failure to correct, in a timely manner, work that does not conform to a condition indicated on an order issued pursuant to section 19B-19. Subd. 2. Written notice of breach. If the City determines that the permittee has committed a substantial breach of a term or condition of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation or any condition of the permit the City shall make a written demand upon the permittee to remedy such violation. The demand shall state that continued violations may be cause for revocation of the permit. A substantial breach, as stated above, will allow the City to place additional or revised conditions on the permit to mitigate and remedy the breach. Subd. 3. Response to notice of breach. Within a time established by the Director following permittee's receipt of notification of the breach, permittee shall provide the City with a plan to cure the breach, acceptable to the City. Permittee's failure to submit a timely and acceptable plan, or permittee's failure to timely implement the approved plan, shall be cause for immediate revocation of the permit. Subd. 4. Reimbursement of City costs. If a permit is revoked, the permittee shall also reimburse the City for the City's reasonable costs, including Restoration costs and the costs of collection and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with such revocation. 802.45. - Mapping data. Subdivision 1. Rule. Each registrant and permittee shall provide mapping information in a form required by the City in accordance with Minnesota Rules 7819.4000 and 7819.4100. Subd. 2. Service Laterals. All permits issued for the installation or repair of service laterals, other than minor repairs as defined in Minnesota Rules 7560.0150 subpart 2, shall require the permittee's use of appropriate means of establishing the horizontal locations of installed service laterals and the service lateral vertical locations in those cases where the Director reasonably requires it. Permittees or their subcontractors shall submit to the Director evidence satisfactory to the Director of the installed service lateral locations. 802.47. - Undergrounding. Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Section 802.47 is to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public and is intended to foster (i) safe travel over the right-of-way, (ii) non-travel related safety around homes and buildings where overhead feeds are connected and (iii) orderly development in the City. Location and relocation, installation and reinstallation of Facilities in the right- of-way or in or on other public ground must be made in accordance with this Subdivision. This Subdivision is intended to be enforced consistently with state and federal law regulating right-of-way users, specifically including but not limited to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 161.45, 237.162, 237.163, 300.03, 222.37, 238.084 and 216B.36 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Title 47, U.S.C. section 253. Subd. 2. Undergrounding of facilities. Facilities newly installed, constructed or otherwise placed in the public right-of-way or in other public property held in common for public use must be located and maintained underground pursuant to the terms and conditions of this section and in accordance with applicable construction standards, subject to the exceptions below. Above-ground installation, construction, modification, or replacement of meters, gauges, transformers, street lighting, pad mount switches, capacitor banks, re-closers and service connection pedestals shall be allowed. The requirements of this Subdivision shall apply equally outside of the corporate limits of the City coincident with City jurisdiction of platting, subdivision regulation or comprehensive planning as may now or in the future be allowed by law. Subd. 3. Undergrounding of permanent replacement, Relocated or Reconstructed Facilities. If the City finds that one (1) or more of the purposes set forth in Section 802.47, Subd. 1. would be promoted, the City may require a permanent replacement, relocation or reconstruction of a Facility of more than 300 feet to be located, and maintained underground, with due regard for seasonal working conditions. For purposes of this section, reconstruction means any substantial repair of or any improvement to existing Facilities. Undergrounding may be required whether a replacement, relocation or reconstruction is initiated by the right-of-way user owning or operating the Facilities, or by the City in connection with: (1) The present or future use by the City or other local government unit of the right-of-way or other public ground for a public project; (2) The public health or safety; or (3) The safety and convenience of travel over the right-of-way. Subd. 4. Exceptions to undergrounding. The following exceptions to the strict application of this Subdivision shall be allowed upon the conditions stated: (a) Transmission lines. Above-ground installation, construction, or placement of those Facilities commonly referred to as "high voltage transmission lines" shall be allowed unless the Council requires undergrounding of the Facilities after providing the right-of-way user notice and an opportunity to be heard. This provision shall not be construed as waiving the requirements of any other ordinance or regulation of the City as the same may apply to any such proposed project. (b) Technical/economic feasibility; promotion of policy. Above-ground installation, construction, or placement of Facilities shall be allowed in residential, commercial and industrial areas where the Council, following consideration and recommendation by the planning commission, finds that: (1) Underground placement would place an undue financial burden upon the landowner, ratepayers, or right-of-way user or would deprive the landowner of the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; or, (2) Underground placement is impractical or not technically feasible due to topographical, subsoil or other existing conditions which adversely affect underground Facilities placement. (3) Failure to promote the purposes of undergrounding. The right-of-way user clearly and convincingly demonstrates that none of the purposes under Section 802.47, Subd. 1 would be advanced by underground placement of Facilities on the project in question, or the City determines on its own review that undergrounding is not warranted based on the circumstances of the proposed undergrounding. (c) Temporary service. Above-ground installation, construction, or placement of temporary service lines shall only be allowed: (1) During new construction of any project for a period not to exceed 24 months; (2) During an emergency in order to safeguard lives or property within the City; (3) For a period of not more than seven (7) months when soil conditions make excavation impractical. (d) Small Wireless Facilities and Wireless Support Structures. Concealed Small Wireless Facilities and Wireless Support Structures may be installed above ground in accordance with this Chapter 802. Subd. 5. Retirement of overhead facilities. The City Council may determine whether it is in the public interest that all Facilities within the City, or Facilities within certain districts designated by the City, be permanently placed and maintained underground by a date certain or target date, independently of undergrounding required pursuant to Section 802.47, Subd. 2. of this Code (new Facilities) and subdivision 802.47, Subd. 3. (Replacement Facilities). The decision to underground must be preceded by a public hearing, after published notice and written notice to the utilities affected. (Two weeks published: 30 days written.) At the hearing the Council must consider items (1)—(4) in Section 802.47, Subd. 5.B. of this Section and make findings. Undergrounding may not take place until City Council has, after hearing and notice, adopted a plan containing items (1)—(6) of Section 802.47, Subd. 5.C. of this Section. (a) Public hearings. A hearing must be open to the public and may be continued from time to time. At each hearing any person interested must be given an opportunity to be heard. The subject of the public hearings shall be the issue of whether Facilities in the right-of-way in the City, or located within a certain district, shall all be located underground by a date certain. Hearings are not necessary for the undergrounding required under Subdivisions 24.B. and D. of this Section. (b) Public hearing issues. The issues to be addressed at the public hearings include but are not limited to: (1) The costs and benefits to the public of requiring the undergrounding of all Facilities in the right-of-way. (2) The feasibility and cost of undergrounding all Facilities by a date certain as determined by the City and the affected utilities. (3) The tariff requirements, procedure and rate design for recovery or intended recovery of incremental costs for undergrounding by the utilities from ratepayers within the City. (4) Alternative financing options available if the City deems it in the public interest to require undergrounding by a date certain and deems it appropriate to participate in the cost otherwise borne by the ratepayers. Upon completion of the hearing or hearings, the City Council must make written findings on whether it is in the public interest to establish a plan under which all Facilities will be underground, either citywide or within districts designated by the City. (c) Undergrounding plan. If the Council finds that it is in the public interest to underground all or substantially all Facilities in the public right-of-way or in non-right-of-way public ground, the Council must establish a plan for such undergrounding. The plan for undergrounding must include at least the following elements: (1) Timetable for the undergrounding. (2) Designation of districts for the undergrounding unless the undergrounding plan is citywide. (3) Exceptions to the undergrounding requirement and procedure for establishing such exceptions. (4) Procedures for the undergrounding process, including but not limited to coordination with City projects and provisions to ensure compliance with non- discrimination requirements under the law. (5) A financing plan for funding of the incremental costs if the City determines that it will finance some of the undergrounding costs, and a determination and verification of the claimed additional costs to underground incurred by the utility. (6) Penalties or other remedies for failure to comply with the undergrounding. Subd. 6. Developer responsibility. All owners, platters, or developers are responsible for complying with the requirements of this Subdivision, and prior to final approval of any plat or development plan, shall submit to the Director written instruments from the appropriate right-of-way users showing that all necessary arrangements with said users for installation of such Facilities have been made. 802.49. - Location and relocation of facilities. Subdivision 1. Rule. Placement, location, and relocation of facilities must comply with the Act, with other applicable law, and with Minnesota Rules 7819.3100, 7819.5000 and 7819.5100, to the extent the rules do not limit authority otherwise available to cities. (a) Relocation notification procedure. The Director shall notify the utility owner at least three (3) months in advance of the need to relocate existing facilities so the owner can determine if relocation or replacement is required and plan any required work. The Director shall provide a second notification to the owner one (1) month before the owner needs to begin the relocation. The utility owner shall begin relocation of the facilities within one (1) month of the second notification. To the extent technically feasible, all utilities shall be relocated within one (1) month or in a time frame determined by the Director. The Director may allow a different schedule if it does not interfere with the City's project. The utility owner shall diligently work to relocate the facilities within the above schedule. (b) Delay to City project. The Director shall notify the utility owner if the owner's progress will not meet the relocation schedule. If the owner fails to meet the relocation schedule due to circumstances within its control, the City may charge the utility owner for all costs incurred and requested by a contractor working for the City who is delayed because the relocation is not completed in the scheduled timeframe and for all costs incurred by the City due to the delay. (c) Joint trenching. All Facilities shall be placed in appropriate portions of right-of-way so as to cause minimum conflict with other underground Facilities. When technically appropriate and no safety hazards are created, all utilities shall be installed, constructed or placed within the same trench. Notwithstanding the foregoing, gas and electric lines shall be placed in conformance with Minnesota Rules pt. 7819.5100, subd. 2, governing safety standards. Subd. 2. Corridors. The City may assign a specific area within the right-of-way, or any particular segment thereof as may be necessary, for each type of facilities that are or, pursuant to current technology, the City expects will be located within the right-of-way. All excavation, obstruction, or other permits issued by the City involving the installation or replacement of Facilities shall designate the proper corridor for the facilities at issue. A typical crossing section of the location for utilities may be on file at the Director's office. This section is not intended to establish "high density corridors". Any Registrant who has facilities in the right-of-way in a position at variance with the corridors established by the City may remain at that location until the City requires Facilities relocation to the corridor pursuant to relocation authority granted under Minnesota Rules part 7819.3100 or other applicable law. Subd. 3. Limitation of space. To protect the public health, safety, and welfare or when necessary to protect the right-of-way and its current use, the City shall have the power to prohibit or limit the placement of new or additional facilities within the right-of-way. In making such decisions, the City shall strive to the extent possible to accommodate all existing and potential users of the right-of-way, but shall be guided primarily by considerations of the public interest, the public's needs for the particular utility service, the condition of the right-of-way, the time of year with respect to essential utilities, the protection of existing facilities in the right-of-way, and future City plans for public improvements and development projects which have been determined to be in the public interest. 802.51. - Pre-excavation facilities location. In addition to complying with the requirements of Minn. Stat. 216D.01-.09 ("One Call Excavation Notice System") before the start date of any right-of-way excavation, each registrant who has facilities or equipment in the area to be excavated shall be responsible to mark the horizontal placement of all said facilities, to the extent technically feasible. To the extent its records contain such information, each registrant shall provide information regarding the approximate vertical location of their facilities to excavators upon request. Nothing in this subsection is meant to limit the rights, duties and obligations of the facility owners or excavators as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 216D.01—.09. 802.53. - Interference by other facilities. When the City does work in the right-of-way in its governmental right-of-way management function and finds it necessary to maintain, support, or move a registrant's facilities to carry out the work without damaging registrant's facilities, the City shall notify the local representative as early as is reasonably possible. The City costs associated therewith will be billed to that registrant and must be paid within 30 days from the date of billing. Each registrant shall be responsible for the cost of repairing any facilities in the right-of-way which it or its facilities damages. 802.55. - Right-of-way vacation; reservation of right. If the City vacates a right-of-way that contains the facilities of a registrant, the registrant's rights in the vacated right-of-way are governed by Minnesota Rules 7819.3200. 802.57. - Indemnification and liability. By registering with the City, or by accepting a permit under this Section, a registrant or permittee agrees to defend and indemnify the City in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Rule 7819.1250. 802.59. - Abandoned facilities. Subdivision 1. Discontinued operations. A registrant who has decided to discontinue all or a portion of its operations in the City must provide information satisfactory to the City that the registrant's obligations for its facilities in the right-of-way under this Section have been lawfully assumed by another registrant. Subd. 2. Removal. Any registrant who has abandoned facilities in any right-of-way shall remove them from that right-of-way pursuant to Minnesota Rule Part 7819.3300, unless the requirement is waived by the Director. 802.61. - Appeal. A right-of-way user that: (1) has been denied registration; (2) has been denied a permit; (3) has had permit revoked; or (4) believes that the fees imposed are not in conformity with Minn. Stat. § 237.163, Subd. 6 may have the denial, revocation, or fee imposition reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. The City Council shall act on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting. A decision by the City Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision. 802.63. - Reservation of regulatory and police powers. A permittee's or registrant's rights are subject to the regulatory and police powers of the City to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. 802.65. - Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Section is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. If a regulatory body or a court of competent jurisdiction should determine by a final, non-appealable order that any permit, right or registration issued under this Section or any portions of this Section is illegal or unenforceable, then any such permit, right or registration granted or deemed to exist hereunder shall be considered as a revocable permit with a mutual right in either party to terminate without cause upon giving 60 days written notice to the other. The requirements and conditions of such a revocable permit shall be the same requirements and conditions as set forth in the permit, right or registration, respectively, except for conditions relating to the term of the permit and the right of termination. Nothing in this Section precludes the City from requiring a franchise agreement with the applicant, as allowed by law, in addition to requirements set forth herein. Section 2. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with Section 3.09 of the City Charter. Adopted this day of , 2017. By Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk AGENDA SECTION:RESOLUTIONS AGENDA ITEM #10. STAFF REPORT NO. 143 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: C hris Regi s, F inance Manager D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/8/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of the 2017 Revised/2018 Proposed Budget r esolutions adopting the 2018 preliminar y property tax levy, setting truth in taxation hearing date, authorizing budget revisions, and authorizing r evision of 2017 budget of various departments. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: On September 6, 2017, a special City Council meeting was held for the purpose of presenting and disc ussing the 2017 Revised/2018 Proposed B udget and 2018 preliminary property tax levy. At this meeting staff presented to the C ity Council a preliminary gross tax levy of $20,667,505 whic h inc ludes a levy for general fund operations of $16,601,455, a debt servic e levy of $2,910,328, a tax abatement levy of $370,722, and an equipment and tec hnology levy of $785,000. Acc ordingly, the 2018 preliminary gross levy represents a 6.34% increase from the 2017 gross levy. Pursuant to City C ounc il disc ussion at the budget meeting, staff is presenting an alternative tax levy option for consideration. The alternate tax levy option includes the use of an additional $265,000 of L GA for 2018. The net effect of this additional L GA reduc es the Gross Tax Levy and the percentage increase over the 2017 Levy. This would reduce the overall levy to $20,399,828, which would result in a gross tax levy increase of 4.97% over the 2017 gross levy. The impact of both tax levy options on a typical Ric hfield home valued at $200,000 is attac hed to this staff report. At this point the C ity Council must make a dec ision regarding what gross tax levy to certify to the County auditor for tax year 2018. This tax levy will be used as the basis of the Truth in Taxation notic es that will be mailed to home owners in late November 2017. Staff c an execute the 2018 C ity General Fund Budget with either of the tax levies selected by the City Council. The levy option using more 2018 L GA to fund c urrent operations, brings the tax levy down for homeowners who may also be seeing tax inc reases in 2018 from other Richfield taxing jurisdictions. As Council is aware, once the preliminary levy is approved, it may be further reduc ed at a later City Council meeting, but it legally cannot be increased over the preliminary approved amount. I n addition, the C ity must c ertify its proposed property tax levy for payable year 2018 to the C ounty Auditor and set a date for its Truth in Taxation public meeting on or before September 29, 2017. The Truth in Taxation public meeting must be held between November 25 and December 28, 2017 and must oc cur at 6:00 p.m. or later. The City’s Truth in Taxation public meeting is scheduled for Tuesday December 5, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. at the C ity of Ric hfield Munic ipal Center. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve resolutions establishing the 2018 preliminary proper ty tax levy and proposed date for the Truth in Taxation hearing, authorizing budget revisions, and author izing revision of 2017 budget of var ious departments. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT None B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): The C ity Charter establishes that at a special budget meeting of the C ounc il on or before September 15, the City Manager must submit to the Council a proposed budget and a budget message in the form and c ontaining the information spec ified in Section 7.06. Consequently, as required by the Truth in Taxation legislation (MS 275.065) each “taxing authority” must c ertify its proposed property tax levy for payable y ear 2018 to the C ounty Auditor on or before September 29, 2017. “Taxing authority” inc ludes all counties, all sc hool districts, all cities regardless of population, all towns, spec ial taxing districts. No loc al units of government are exempted from this requirement. I n addition, eac h “taxing authority” with a population of 500 or more, must certify to their County Auditor the date that has been selected for the Truth in Taxation public meeting by September 29, 2017. This Truth in Taxation public meeting must be held between November 25 and December 29, 2017 and must oc cur at 6:00 p.m. or later. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: Along with the 2017 Revised/2018 Proposed budget and preliminary property tax levy, City staff is also rec ommending a date for this y ear ’s Truth in Taxation public meeting. I t is rec ommended that this year ’s meeting be set for 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, D ec ember 5, 2017. A s C ounc il Members are aware, at these public meetings, the tax levy may be reduc ed from the preliminary tax levy, but not inc reased. All official ac tion c oncerning the preliminary tax levy and setting dates for the Truth in Taxation hearings must be conc luded before September 29, 2017. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: The preliminary gross levy for taxes pay able 2018 as originally presented is $20,667,505. An alternative preliminary gross for taxes pay able 2018 pursuant to the S eptember 6, 2017, special City C ounc il meeting is $20,399,828. The alternative gross levy reduces the tax levy from an original increase of 6.34% down to an inc rease of 4.97%. Also, inc luded in the 2018 preliminary gross levy is a levy to fund the purchase of rolling stock and tec hnology equipment of $785,000. This levy is in plac e of the issuance of debt to fund these purchases. A final resolution for c onsideration authorizes the revision of the 2017 budget to c onform to the most recent 2017 revenue and expenditure projections. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : None ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): The C ity Council c ould adopt a lesser 2018 preliminary property tax levy or 2017 Revised/2018 Proposed budget or selec t other allowable Truth in Taxation hearing dates. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: N/A AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type Resolution - 2018 P roposed B udget & Tax L evy - 6.34%Resolution L etter Resolution - 2018 P roposed B udget & Tax L evy - 4.97%Resolution L etter Resolution - A uthorize Revision of 2017 B udget Resolution L etter Resolution - A uthorize Revision of 2017 B udget of Various D epartments Resolution L etter Tax L evy Impact - 6.34%B ackup Materi al Tax L evy Impact - 4.97%B ackup Materi al RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2018 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Truth in Taxation law provides for a proposed tax levy to be certified to the County Auditor by September 29, 2017 and then recertified before December 29, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The budget for the City of Richfield for the year 2018 is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for each of the departments to be as follows: General Fund Legislative/Executive $ 902,290 Administrative Services 1,466,170 Public Safety 9,067,810 Fire Services 4,274,500 Community Development 1,426,480 Public Works 4,074,100 Recreation Services 1,943,660 Transfers Out 195,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $23,350,010 2. The estimated gross revenue of the City of Richfield from all sources, including general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year 2018 which are more fully detailed in the City Manager’s official copy of the 2018 budget, are hereby found and determined to be as follows: TOTAL GENERAL FUND $23,350,010 3. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2017, payable in 2018 for the following purposes and in the following amounts: PURPOSE AMOUNT General Fund1 $16,601,4552 Equipment 785,000 Debt Service 2,910,328 Cedar Point Tax Abatement 370,722 1 Provision has been made in the General Fund for the payment of the City’s contributory share to Public Employees’ Retirement Association. 2 General Fund Levy includes all fiscal disparities distribution amounts. 4. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A, will be reduced from $140,081 to $127,701 due to the use surplus bond proceeds from the issue. 5. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2015A will be reduced from $629,534 to $280,501 due to the utilization of gas and electric franchise fees. 6. The budget for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield for the year 2018 is hereby ratified and approved. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2017, payable in 2018 for the following purposes: PURPOSE AMOUNT Housing and Redevelopment Authority $571,905 7. The budget for the Economic Development Authority of Richfield for the year 2018 is hereby ratified and approved. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2017, payable in 2018 for the following purposes: PURPOSE AMOUNT Economic Development Authority $560,467 8. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the County Auditor. 9. The Truth in Taxation public meeting shall be set for 6:00 p.m. December 5, 2017. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET AND TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2018 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Truth in Taxation law provides for a proposed tax levy to be certified to the County Auditor by September 29, 2017 and then recertified before December 29, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The budget for the City of Richfield for the year 2018 is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for each of the departments to be as follows: General Fund Legislative/Executive $ 902,290 Administrative Services 1,466,170 Public Safety 9,067,810 Fire Services 4,274,500 Community Development 1,426,480 Public Works 4,074,100 Recreation Services 1,943,660 Transfers Out 195,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $23,350,010 2. The estimated gross revenue of the City of Richfield from all sources, including general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year 2018 which are more fully detailed in the City Manager’s official copy of the 2018 budget, are hereby found and determined to be as follows: TOTAL GENERAL FUND $23,350,010 3. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2017, payable in 2018 for the following purposes and in the following amounts: PURPOSE AMOUNT General Fund1 $16,333,7782 Equipment 785,000 Debt Service 2,910,328 Cedar Point Tax Abatement 370,722 1 Provision has been made in the General Fund for the payment of the City’s contributory share to Public Employees’ Retirement Association. 2 General Fund Levy includes all fiscal disparities distribution amounts. 4. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2012A, will be reduced from $140,081 to $127,701 due to the use surplus bond proceeds from the issue. 5. The debt service tax levy as established in the bond documents for the G.O. Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2015A will be reduced from $629,534 to $280,501 due to the utilization of gas and electric franchise fees. 6. The budget for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Richfield for the year 2018 is hereby ratified and approved. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2017, payable in 2018 for the following purposes: PURPOSE AMOUNT Housing and Redevelopment Authority $571,905 7. The budget for the Economic Development Authority of Richfield for the year 2018 is hereby ratified and approved. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year 2017, payable in 2018 for the following purposes: PURPOSE AMOUNT Economic Development Authority $560,467 8. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the County Auditor. 9. The Truth in Taxation public meeting shall be set for 6:00 p.m. December 5, 2017. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET REVISIONS WHEREAS, the City Charter and Minnesota Statutes provide for a process for adopting an annual budget and tax levy; and WHEREAS, the City Charter provides certain authority for the City Manager and/or City Council to revise the annual budget; and WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to restate such authority with the adoption of the budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Manager may increase the budget by City Council action provided that unbudgeted receipts will be available to equal or exceed the increased expenditures. 2. The City Manager may authorize transfers between divisions within a department providing the transfers do not increase or decrease the department or total budget. 3. The City Manager may transfer budgeted amounts between departments only with the approval of the City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September, 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 2017 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS WHEREAS, Resolution No. 11302 appropriated funds for personal services, other expenses and capital outlays for each department of the City for the year of 2017; and WHEREAS, The City Charter, Chapter 7, Section 7.09, gives the Council authority to transfer unencumbered appropriation balances from one department to another within the same fund at the request of the City Manager; and WHEREAS, The City Manager has requested a revision of the 2017 budget appropriations in accordance with Charter provisions and as detailed in the Proposed 2018 budget document. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the 2017 appropriations for each department of the General Fund be amended to establish the following totals: General Fund Legislative/Executive $ 867,640 Administrative Services 1,441,510 Public Safety 8,562,100 Fire Services 4,150,030 Community Development 1,393,060 Public Works 3,968,540 Recreation Services 1,882,790 Transfer Out 175,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $22,440,670 DECREASE $ 293,200 2. Estimated 2017 gross revenue of the City of Richfield from all sources, as the same are more fully detailed in the City Manager’s official copy of the proposed 2018 budget, are hereby revised as follows: DECREASE $293,200 3. That the City Manager and the Finance Manager bring into effect the provisions of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of September 2017. Pat Elliott, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________ Elizabeth VanHoose, City Clerk Home value:Tax Capacity Rate:0.583070 Home value:Tax Capacity Rate:0.568488 $200,000 $200,000 Tax Capacity $2,000.00 Tax Capacity $2,000.00 City Portion taxes:$1,166.14 City Portion taxes:$1,136.98 Effect on taxes - no market value change:$29.16 Monthly 2.43$ Home value:Ave. Market Increase:0.068 Home value:0.56849 $213,600 $200,000 Tax Capacity $2,136.00 Tax Capacity $2,000.00 City Portion taxes:$1,245.44 City Portion taxes:$1,136.98 Effect on taxes - 6.8% market value increase:$108.46 9.54% Monthly 9.04$ Home Value: $200,000 Payable 2018 Payable 2017 Home value:Tax Capacity Rate:0.574081 Home value:Tax Capacity Rate:0.568488 $200,000 $200,000 Tax Capacity $2,000.00 Tax Capacity $2,000.00 City Portion taxes:$1,148.16 City Portion taxes:$1,136.98 Effect on taxes - no market value change:$11.19 Monthly 0.93$ Home value:Ave. Market Increase:0.068 Home value:0.56849 $213,600 $200,000 Tax Capacity $2,136.00 Tax Capacity $2,000.00 City Portion taxes:$1,226.24 City Portion taxes:$1,136.98 Effect on taxes - 6.8% market value increase:$89.26 7.85% Monthly 7.44$ Payable 2017Payable 2018 Home Value: $200,000 AGENDA SECTION:OTHER BUSINESS AGENDA ITEM #11. STAFF REPORT NO. 144 CIT Y COUNCIL ME E T ING 9/12/2017 RE P O RT P RE PA RE D B Y: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice D E PA RTM E NT D IRE C TOR RE V IE W: J ay Henthorne, D irector of P ublic S afety/C hi ef of P olice 9/1/2017 O TH E R D E PA RTM E NT RE V IE W: N/A C ITY M A NA G E R RE V IE W: S teven L . D evich, C ity Manager 9/7/2017 I T E M F O R C O UNC I L C O NS I D E RAT IO N: Consideration of the approval of a data sharing agreement for analysis of use of force incident reports from the Richfield Police Department. E X E C UT IV E S UM M ARY: The Police Department does not currently have an adequate program to track use of force reports. The purchase of the P olice Forc e Analysis Systems will allow the Police Department to assess the legal risk on use of force inc idents, provide detailed analysis, promote best prac tices, and c reate a level of transparency between the Polic e Department and the community. The C ity of Ric hfield will supply the rec ords or items of information that will be entered through the use of an online reporting tool. The C ity of Ric hfield may exclude any information c ontained in these records that the C ity deems private data. RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: By motion: Approve a data sharing agreement to facilitate the transfer of r elevant data from the City of Richfield to Police Force Analysis System for coding. B AS IS O F RE C O M M E ND AT IO N: A.H IS TOR IC AL C ON TEXT The Ric hfield Police Department currently does not have an adequate program to track use of force incidents. This program would allow us to assess legal risk assessment, obtain detailed analysis, promote transparency, and utilize best practic es. B.P OL IC IE S (resolutions, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc): Consultant understands and agrees that all of the data it rec eives from the City and maintains in performing its obligations under this A greement is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Prac tices Act, Minnesota Statutes, C hapter 13, as amended, and that Consultant must c omply with the requirements thereof as if it were a government entity. Consultant further understands and agrees that the remedies set forth in Minnesota Statutes Sec tion 13.08 apply to Consultant in connec tion with suc h requirements. C.C R IT IC AL T IMIN G ISSU E S: There are no critic al timing issues. D.F IN AN C IAL IMPAC T: Police Forc e Analysis System will bill the City of Richfield a one time c harge of $1,500 for the use of the online reporting tool and then $500 for each dashboard build or update. The C ity may enter an unlimited number of use of force reports into the online reporting tool and will only be charged for each dashboard update. E.L E GAL C ON S ID E R AT ION : The C ity Attorney has reviewed and approved the data sharing agreement with Polic e Force Analy sis Sy stem. ALT E R N AT IV E R E C O MME N D AT IO N(S): Do not sign the agreement; however, Public Safety would need to find other means to trac k use of force incidents. P R IN C IPAL PAR TIE S EXP E C T E D AT ME E T IN G: None AT TAC H ME N TS : D escripti on Type D ata S haring A greement C ontract/A greement Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC Data Sharing Agreement 2017-06 Page 1 of 6 Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC 13197 Madison Ave NE Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Phone: (206) 915-8683 Email: bob@policestrategies.com DATA SHARING AGREEMENT DATA SHARING AGREEMENT NO. 2017-06 FOR ANALYSES OF USE OF FORCE INCIDENT REPORTS FROM THE RICHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT Executed By The City of Richfield, hereinafter referred to as "City"; City Authorized Representative: Mayor Pat Elliott City of Richfield 6700 Portland Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55423 Email: PElliott@RichfieldMN.gov and Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC, a company authorized to conduct business in the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"; Consultant Authorized Representative: Robert Scales, CEO Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC 13197 Madison Ave NE Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 Phone: (206) 915-8683 Email: bob@policestrategies.com Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC Data Sharing Agreement 2017-06 Page 2 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Data Sharing Agreement by having their representatives affix their signatures below. Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC City of Richfield By: _____________________________ By: ________________________________ Robert Scales, CEO Pat Elliott, Mayor Date: _______________ Date: ___________________ By: ________________________________ Steve Devich, City Manager Date: ___________________ DATA SHARING AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO THE RELEASE OF POLICE USE OF FORCE INCIDENT REPORTS OR ANY OTHER RECORDS OR DATA FOR USE IN THE POLICE FORCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM℠ WHEREAS, the City desires to use the Police Force Analysis System℠ to examine the City’s use of force incidents and compare its use of force practices with other agencies; and WHEREAS, for purposes of this Agreement, “use of force” is defined as Richfield Police Department recordable force. WHEREAS, for purposes of this Agreement, “public” or “public release” includes release to other law enforcement agencies using the Police Force Analysis System℠; WHEREAS, the Consultant requires the City to enter data from its use of force incident reports using an online reporting tool in order to enter the necessary data fields into the Police Force Analysis System℠; and WHEREAS, the City has duly authorized the data request, which is outlined in Sections (1) and (2) below; and WHEREAS, the Consultant represents knowledge of and familiarization with, as applicable, the provisions of 28 CFR, Part 22 Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical Information, including provisions for Information Transfer Agreement in Part 22.24 (C) and for Sanctions in Part 22.29 thereof, RCW Ch. 10.97 Washington State Criminal Records Privacy Act, RCW 13.50 Keeping and Release of Records by Juvenile or Care Agencies, particularly juvenile information requirements specified in RCW 13.50.010 (8) and RCW 13.50.050 (23), RCW 42.48 Release of Records for Research, particularly RCW 42.48.040 Disclosure by Research Professional; and RCW 42.56 Public Records Act; and the California Public Records Act (Cal. Govt. Code §6250, et seq.), including Sections 6254 (Records exempt from disclosure requirements) and 6254.5 (Disclosure of Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC Data Sharing Agreement 2017-06 Page 3 of 6 otherwise exempt records; Exemptions), as well as Penal Code §13202 (disclosure of criminal offender record information for research purposes); Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minn. Stat. Chapter 13). NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performance of the work described herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1) Purpose of the Data Sharing Agreement The purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate the transfer of relevant data from the City to the Consultant for coding and data entry into the Police Force Analysis System℠ (P-FAS). P-FAS is a database that contains use of force data from multiple law enforcement agencies. P-FAS is used for research, evaluation and statistical analysis. P-FAS was created by extracting relevant use of force information from law enforcement agencies’ use of force reports, incident reports and officer statements. That information is coded and entered into the P-FAS database. The Consultant then creates a series of interactive dashboards for the City’s use as a risk management tool and an early warning system. The Consultant also provides comparative dashboards to the City that allow for benchmarking with similar agencies. The comparative dashboards have agency level information from multiple agencies but they do not contain any personally identifiable information. Dashboards prepared for the City will contain identifiable information about the City’s officers (names, serial numbers and/or badge numbers), but this identifiable information is only made available to the City itself and is not disseminated to other organizations or to the public. P-FAS does not contain any personally identifiable information of private individuals. The de-identified data contained in the Police Force Analysis System℠ may be transferred to other organizations for the purpose of research, evaluation and statistical analysis. In such cases, the personally identifiable information of individual officers will not be used in any public reports. Any reported data at the individual officer level will be coded to protect the anonymity of the officer. The Consultant obtains information regarding use of force incidents solely from the reports generated by the City. The Consultant does not need and does not use any information that the City may include in its incident reports that is obtained from other sources such as the Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS)(e.g. fingerprints, criminal histories, sex offender registrations, etc.). 2) Law Enforcement Records and Information The City will supply the records or items of information specified in detail below which shall be covered by the terms of this Agreement: data from use of force incident reports that will be entered through the use of an online reporting tool. The City may exclude any information contained in these records that the City receives from external data systems such as the Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS)(e.g. fingerprints, criminal histories, sex offender registrations, etc.) and/or that the City deems protected under any applicable State or Federal law. The date range of the reports included in this agreement may be amended from time to time upon mutual agreement of the parties. Consultant will bill the City a one-time charge of $1,500 for use of the online reporting tool and then $500 for each dashboard build or update. The City may enter an unlimited number of use of force reports into the online reporting tool and will only be charged for each dashboard update. The City may determine the frequency of the dashboard updates. Upon notification that the City desires a Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC Data Sharing Agreement 2017-06 Page 4 of 6 dashboard update, the Consultant will have up to 30 days to provide the updated dashboards to the City. 3) Consultant Special Conditions It is understood that the reports and information provided by the City will be analyzed under the direction of the Consultant. The Consultant may use students from Seattle University and/or other subcontractors to assist in coding the data from the use of force records. Use of the provided records shall be subject to the Special Conditions noted below that shall apply to the Consultant as well as any students and/or subcontractors participating in coding and data entry. a) For purposes of this Agreement, the Consultant shall: i) Use the records specified in Section (2) for research, evaluative and statistical purposes and for use in the Police Force Analysis System℠ and the Police Force Analysis Network℠; ii) Limit access to the records specified in Section (2) to only the Consultant and to Consultant- supervised students and/or subcontractors whose responsibilities to the project cannot be accomplished without such access, and who have been advised of and agreed to comply with the provisions of this Agreement and, as applicable, of 28 CFR Part 22, RCW Ch. 10.97, Juvenile information requirements, as required in RCW 13.50.010 (8) and RCW 13.50.050 (23), RCW 42.48, particularly RCW 42.48.040; and RCW 42.56; and the California Public Records Act (Cal. Govt. Code §6250, et seq.), including Sections 6254 (Records exempt from disclosure requirements) and 6254.5 (Disclosure of otherwise exempt records; Exemptions), as well as Penal Code §13202 (disclosure of criminal offender record information for research purposes); and 42 U.S.C. §405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I)( Disclosure of Social Security Records); 18 U.S.C. §§2721-25 (Driver Privacy Protection Act); §995.50 Wis. Stats., (Right to Privacy), §942.08 Wis. Stats. (Invasion of Privacy); §938.396 Wis. Stats. (Juvenile Justice Code – Records); §48.396 Wis. Stats. (Law Enforcement Records – Juveniles); §19.31 - §19.39 Wis. Stats. (Open Records Law) including but not limited to, the exemptions listed in §19.36 Wis. Stats.; Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minn. Stat. Chapter 13). iii) Safeguard all hard copy and electronic forms of Section (2) records to prevent unauthorized persons from accessing files which may include, but are not limited to, limiting access to identifiable information, securely storing data documents in locked locations and assigning security codes to computerized records. b) For purposes of this Agreement, the Consultant and Consultant-supervised students and/or subcontractors shall not: i) Disclose any Section (2) information that is identifiable to a private person, such as names, addresses, social security numbers or driver’s license numbers, except as pursuant to 28 CFR Part 22.24 (a) (b) and (c). The Consultant may use the names, serial numbers and badge numbers of the City’s officers identified in Section (2) records and may enter such information into the Police Force Analysis System℠. The Consultant shall not use individual officer identification information in any publicly produced reports without written authorization from the City; ii) Make copies of any Section (2) records, except as clearly necessary for use by Consultant and Consultant-supervised students and/or contractors to accomplish the purposes of the research and for data entry into the Police Force Analysis System℠; Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC Data Sharing Agreement 2017-06 Page 5 of 6 c) The Consultant understands and agrees that: i) Personally identifiable information of private individuals will be used only for research, evaluation and statistical purposes and for use in the Police Force Analysis System℠; ii) Personally identifiable information of private individuals will not be revealed to any person, other than the City itself, for any purpose except where the information is needed for research and statistical purposes within the Police Force Analysis System℠. Any public release of research reports at the individual officer level will not include the identity of the officers. Information identifiable to individual officers of the City may be revealed to the City and City personnel; iii) Adequate administrative and physical precautions will be taken to assure security of Section (2) records which may include, but are not limited to, limiting access to identifiable information, securely storing data documents in locked locations and assigning security codes to computerized records iv) When disseminating information to the public or to organizations other than the City itself, project plans will be designed to preserve anonymity of private persons to whom information relates, including, where appropriate, required name-stripping and/or coding of data or other similar procedures; v) Reports, databases and electronic dashboards that are prepared for the City may contain the names, badge numbers and/or serial numbers of the City’s officers. 4) Term of Agreement The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date of execution as signed by the designee of the City and shall be for an indefinite term subject to the termination provisions below. 5) Renewal and Termination This Agreement may be terminated when either party gives 10 days written notice to the other party of his or her intent to terminate. Notice shall be deemed sufficiently given or served if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to the Consultant to: Robert Scales Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC 13197 Madison Ave NE Bainbridge Island, WA 98110-1153 If to the City to: Mayor Pat Elliott City of Richfield 6700 Portland Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55423 The parties shall each have the right from time to time to change the place notice is to be given under this paragraph by written notice thereof to the other party. Sanford, Olson & Scales LLC Data Sharing Agreement 2017-06 Page 6 of 6 6) Disposition Of Police Records / Information Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant agrees to securely destroy, by shredding or other adequate means of destruction, all records obtained from the City under Section 2, including all originals and copies made thereof. All reports, notes, memos, dashboards and databases created by the Consultant using data from Section (2) records are the property of the Consultant and may be retained and used by the Consultant after the termination of this Agreement. After the termination of the Agreement, the Consultant will continue to abide by the terms of this Agreement regarding the use of personally identifiable information of private individuals. 9) Miscellaneous Provisions a) None of the provisions of this Agreement are intended to create, and none shall be deemed or construed to create, any relationship between the parties other than that of independent entities contracting with each other solely for the purpose of effecting the provisions of the Agreement. Neither party is an employee of the other party; nor is either party entitled to any of the benefits and protections afforded to employees of the other party. b) This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by federal laws and regulations and the laws and regulations of the State of Minnesota, except to the extent such laws and regulations are preempted or superseded by federal law or regulation. c) This Agreement may be amended only by a written agreement signed by the parties hereto. d) The Consultant and the City agree that the venue for any and all conflicts and resolution arising out of or related to this agreement shall be the State of Minnesota and that the laws of the State of Minnesota shall apply. e) Severability - If one or more of the provisions in this Agreement are deemed void by law, then the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect. f) Consultant shall provide a certificate of insurance to City demonstrating adequate coverage prior to commencing services for the City. g) Consultant agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify City from and against any claims or damages, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, arising out of Consultant’s negligent or intentional misuse of City’s data, including but not limited to, any claims or damages related to the unauthorized release of City’s data. h) Consultant understands and agrees that all of the data it receives from the City and maintains in performing its obligations under this Agreement is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, as amended, and that Consultant must comply with the requirements thereof as if it were a government entity. Consultant further understands and agrees that the remedies set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08 apply to Consultant in connection with such requirements.