The URL can be used to link to this page

12-10-90 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 291 .Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Special City Council Meeting to Discuss City Manager Evaluation and Compensation Determination Background• Mayor Quam•has been working with members of the city council regarding the city manager's performance evaluation. By memo to the Council dated November 26, 1990 the Mayor scheduled a brief special council meeting at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, December 10, 1990, preceding the regular council meeting. A copy of that memorandum was distributed to council members on November 26 and is attached. The meeting was also announced at the regular City Council on November 26. Recommended Motion: Attend a special council meeting to discuss the city manager's evaluation and compensation. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The meeting was called by Mayor Quam. Alternative Recommendation: 1. None Discussion/Decision Mode: A special meeting has been December 10. A resolution city manager is placed on Resolutions. scheduled for 6:30 p.m. Monday, relating to the compensation of the the regular council agenda under Respectfully submitted, EJA:ttf CITY OF RICHFIELD Memorandum DATE: November 26, 1990 TO: Council Member Garcia Council Member Sandahl Council Member Kirsch -- FROM: Mayor Steve Quam SUBJECT: City Manager Evaluation Now that the election is over, I still need evaluations from Edwina and Mike. Marty, I also need a photocopy of the one you and I discussed. Please drop it .off with Eileen. I will need these evaluations before December 10 so that we can schedule a brief special council meeting on salary recommendations before our December 10, 1990 regular council meeting. Please mark your calendar for a 6:30 p.m. meeting on December 10. SQ:eja cc: Council Member Ludeman CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 292 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Recognition of Rich Acres Golf Course for receiving 1990 National Golf Award for excellence in promoting and enhancing the public golf experience. Background: Richfield's Rich Acres Golf Course has been chosen as one of 50 golf facilities across the United States to receive the National Golf Foundation's (NGF) Public Golf Achievement for 1990. The award program is part of an ongoing effort by the Foundation to underscore the importance of public golf to the growth and enjoyment of the game in America. A profile on Rich Acres success story was published in the fall edition of the NGF's magazine, Golf Course Development and ODerations Quarterly. (See attachment.) Recommended Motion: Acknowledge receipt of Rich Acres Golf Course award from the National Golf Foundation for public golf achievement in 1990. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Rich .Acres Golf Course is a municipal public golf course. 2. Rich Acres Golf Course has been recognized by the National Golf Foundation for efforts, as a public golf course, to promote and enhance the growth and enjoyment of golf in an exemplary manner. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: Staff members of the Community Services Department and Rich Acres Golf Course as well as design consultants Don Brauer and Paul Fjare will be present at the December 10, 1990, Council meeting to share the National Golf Foundation's (NGF) Public Golf Achievement for 1990 with the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Jam D. Prosser Cit Manager JDP:sdr ,, f Course Operating Profile Minnesota's Rich Acres Golf Course Minnesota has a great golfparticipatiunrate-the highest in the U.S. with 17.6 percent of the population over 5 years old playing vs. 10.8 percent nationally. The reason may be because of courses like Rich Ac•r~s in Richfield, a Minneapolis suburb. This sporty 6,600-yard, 18-bolt municipal course plays 60,000 rounds in the seven-month season. Its 9-hole par-3 plays 30,000 rounds. The course, designed by Jerry Perkol and built by Brauer & Associates, is recognized as one of the better public courses in the area. It was built on buffer land the city leased for 30 years from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Airports Commission. Its $1.9 million construction cost was financed by a revenue bond, plus about $300,000 the city designated from Richfield liquor stores revenues. Opened in 1980, Rich Acres is operated as part of the City of Richfield's excellent sports and recreation pro- gram. But it's the team of Manager Darrel Harman, head professional Mike Lanigan and staff that generates the golf excitement. They promote to all types of golfers with group programs, individual instruction, reduced off-peak hour fees, speed-of--play programs and emphasis on facility pride. Eil;ht private and public golf Ieul;ues compete on the par-3 throughout the summer months including seniors, .ladies, couples, church groups, city employees and juniors. One unique feature is that the par-3 can also be reserved for private outings an advanced notice. The senior league annually attracts more than 250 participants who play both courses. Juniors are encouraged to play in a unique Clubs-for- Kids promotion jointly sponsored by Rich Acres and a local sporting goods retailer why offers a bag and a rental junior starter set for the summer for $15. This season 110 youngsters registered for the junior league with 40 renting their clubs. Rich Acres' rate structure is one big reason the courses aze always full. ' Putrnn tickets at $40 give golfers a $2 discount off the regular $12/$13 18-hole fees on weekdays/weekends, and $1 off the $8.50 9-hole fee. Senior/Junior tickets at $ I S for anyone 62 or older or 18 or younger let golfers play 18 holes at a $3 discount or 9 holes at a $2.SU discount during restricted hours. This year the course sold 200 patron and 500 senior/ junior tickets. There is also a special twilight rate of $7.75. Last year's revenue was more than $1.1 million, including $110,000 from the clubhouse snack and bar facility and $160,000 from the range. The course gener- ated more than $100,000 net revenue after "a number of capital improvements had been paid for," according to Manager Darrel Harman. Golfers at this active Minnesota course are primarily walkers. "Not more than 10 or 15 percent of the rounds are with a golf car," says Harman, noting that, "The fees arc about a dol lar a hole, $18 for l 8 and $ l U for 9 holes." Emphasizing speedy play, Rich Acres publishes brochures on the subject and has signs with reminders on how to speed play. Afternoon starting times aze spaced at eight minutes rather than the seven-minute intervals in the morning. This helps pace the later times when play characteristically slows. Course rangers are instructed to give friendly but firm reminders to golfers who play slowly or use poor etiquette, and to hand out reminders. Perhaps the strongest element in Rich Acres all-round golf promotion is its instruction program. Four PGA- trained instructors are on hand. Group lessons for begin- ners are offered in three six-week sessions in morning, evening and weekend classes. A limited number of intermediate classes are also available. Twenty-six group sessions are held throughout the summer with l2 people for beginners classes and seven for intermediate groups. Group lessons are $50 for six one-hoursessions. An important element in Rich Acres aggressive teaching and learning program is the 35-station grass driving range and separate lesson tee for groups and individuals. Instructors give private lessons by appoint- mentall day long, Monday through Saturday at $23 for a half-hour. Video lessons are also available. All instructors also teach junior classes and monitor junior league play. Two 1'rec clinics are offered to juniors along with a free gift donated by a local golf merchant. A Special four-week program for the physically handicapped and mentally retarded is also offered in conjunction with Richfield Community Adaptive Pro- gram. Fliers on lesson, practice and playing etiquette aze handed out to students. Key thoughts include, "Golf is a Ladies' and Gentlemen's game. Proper etiquette is impor- tant and expected." - "Proper attire is helpful. Dress to swing a golf club. We suggest loose clotl-ing." - "Please use common sense during lessons. Do not run out in front of the class to pick up balls and tees." Finally, "Remember, practice doesn't make perfect - perfect practice makes perfect." It seems apparent that Rich Acres' total golf inswc- tion and promotion program is generating rich rewards for the municipality and for its golfers. - 7 GCD&O /Fat! 1990 City of Richfield, Minnesota Council Letter No. 293 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Presentation of commendation certificates from the President's Environmental Youth Awards to Richfield S. W. A. T. (Student Weatherization Action Team) Education Project members. Background: The Environmental Protection Agency's Presidential Environmental Youth Awards Program encourages youth of the nation to promote local environmental awareness and channel this awareness into positive community involvement. The Richfield Energy Program developed a S.W.A.T. (Student Weatherization Action Team) Education Project with: 1) assistance of the Self Reliance Center; 2) contribution funds from Northern States Power Company; 3) a Community Energy Council grant; 4) cooperation of staff, faculty and students of Richfield High School. At the urging of school staff and Senator Rudy Boschwitz, the project was entered in the program and the S.W.A.T. members have been awarded a certificate of Commendation from the President of the United States for their outstanding achievement in environmental protection services. The S.W.A.T. members, school staff members and representatives from Northern States Power Company will be present at the Council meeting. The City of Richfield Community Energy Program has also received a Certificate of Commendation from Governor Rudy Perpich in recognition of outstanding service to the people of Minnesota, consistent with the goals of preserving the environment, strengthening the economy and conserving energy resources. Recommended Motion: Present the certificates to the S.W.A.T. Education Project members and recognize contributors to the project. Basis of Recommendation: This is an important and meaningful project for the school and community.' Alternative Recommendation: Schedule the presentation for some other council meeting. 3- l Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been scheduled under the Presentation Section of the December 10, 1990 council agenda. Respectfully submitted, James Prosser City Manager JDP:ds 5A CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 294 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Purchase in excess of $5,000 for elevator repairs at the Richfield Community Center. Background: The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise, materials,. equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration. The Community Center elevator was installed in 1980. Since that time, the mechanical area has been flooded twice and humidity in the area has always been a problem, causing shorts in the system. This past summer the elevator's electrical components gave out in a series of mechanical failures during July and August. None of the repair bills were paid earlier, as staff was disputing some of the charges. The system is now. working properly, the moisture problem has been solved, and agreement has been reached with the vendor. Staff is investigating the possibility of obtaining a maintenance contract for the elevator in order to avoid these unexpectedly high maintenance costs in the future. Recommended Motion: Approve a purchase order to R&O Elevator in the sum of $5,097 for repairs to the Community Center elevator. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The repairs had to be made, as the safe, daily operation of this elevator is essential. 2. The elevator is now working properly. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: Staff is requesting payment at this time. Respectfully submitted, Ja s D. Prosser C't Manager JDP/reb ~J CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 295 Agenda December 10, 1990 issue Statement: Purchase of 1991 trash pickup services at city-owned facilities. Background: Trash pickup is required at all city facilities on a regular basis. A formal bid opening for trash hauling from all city- owned facilities, excluding the liquor stores, for calendar year 1991, was held November 30, 1990 with the following results: Vendor Estimated Annual Amount Buckingham Disposal $19,894.00 Browning-Ferris Industries 22,470.00 Quality Waste Control 23,923.00 Waste Management 30,924.00 Knutson Rubbish 35,201.51 The various sites budget for their portion of the service. Due to the variety of needs, costs will vary from site to site; i.e., City Hall will have more frequent pickups than Fire Station #2• Due to seasonal demands, costs may vary from month to month at an individual site; i.e., the golf course has more frequent pickups during the golf season. Quality Waste Control was the 1990 hauler, with a contract price of $19,961. Recommended Motion: Approve the bid minutes/tabulation and approve a 1991 Master Purchase. Order in the estimated sum of $19,894 for Buckingham Disposal, Inc. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Buckingham Disposal, Inc. submitted the low bid, and is a reputable, licensed hauler. 2. Adopted 1991 budgets include funding for this service. Alternative Recommendation: Council could reject all proposals and direct staff to obtain new quotations; however, staff does not believe we could obtain better prices. Discussion/Decision Mode: The current contract with Quality Waste Control, Inc. will end December 31, 1990. Staff is requesting approval at this time in order to provide uninterrupted service to city facilities. Respec f y submitted, James Prosser City ager JDP/reb Attachment CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ~ ~_I Bid Opening November 30, 1990 11:00 A.M. 1991 Garbage Pick-Up at City-Owned Facilities Bid No. 90-18 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for 1991 garbage pick-up at city-owned facilities, bid no. 90-18 as advertised in the official newspaper on November 14, 1990. Present: Thomas Ferber, City Clerk Donald Fondrick, Community Services Director Eileen Anderson, City Manager Representative Randy Hughes, Operations Coordinator Roxi Braa, Administrative Aide The following bids were submitted and .read aloud: VENDOR BID TOTAL SECURITY Buckingham Disposal, Inc. 5$ Bid Bond $ 19,894.00 Savage, MN Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI) 5$ Bid Bond $ 22,470.00 Minneapolis, MN Quality Waste Control Cashier's S 23,923.00 Burnsville, MN Check Waste Management Cashier's $ 30,924.00 Savage, MN Check Knutson Rubbish Cashier's $ 35,201.51 Rosemount Check The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the December 10, 1990 City Council Meeting. Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk . .:~~f . 5G CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA -~ Council Letter No. 296 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Award contract to print four 1991 seasonal recreation brochures. Background: On November 26, 1990, in accordance with legal requirements, bids were opened for the printing of the 1991 seasonal recreation brochures. Specifications were distributed to 29 vendors, and four bids were received. Attached is the bid tabulation sheet which lists the bidders. There were four options to the bid: Base Bid A: Includes printing services as specified provided by the vendor, the publication printed on bond paper, and the layout and art work are provided by the City. Alternate A: Includes everything in Base Bid A, except the publication is printed on recycled paper. Base Bid B: Includes all printing services. The City does not provide the layout and art work, and the publication is printed on bond paper. Alternate B: Includes everything in Base Bid B, except the publication is printed on recycled paper. Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter recreation brochures are distributed to each residence in the City. With the exception of the Summer brochure, the school district participates in the brochures by including classes offered by their Community Education Department and sharing a proportional cost of the publications. The specifications also are written to provide for renewal of the contract in 1992 upon mutual agreement of the City and. the contractor. The 1990 contract was with Artcraft Press Inc. in the amount of $29,694. There are sufficient funds in the 1991 adopted operating budget for the City's share of the four publications. The City of Richfield has been making recycling efforts. As a part of the commitment toward recycling, staff recommends the option of printing on recycled paper be used. The school district administration has agreed and has further indicated they are willing to support the City's decision either way. The additional 1991 cost of using recycled paper would amount to $1,167.50 for the City and $742.50 for-the school district. Recommended Motion: Approve the bid minutes/tabulation and award the contract for the 1991 Seasonal recreation brochures to Artcraft Press Inc. in the amount of $28,893 which includes all printing services and the publication printed on recycled paper (Alternate A). 5C- ~ - Basis of Recommendation: 1. Artcraft Press Inc. submitted the lowest bid. 2. There is sufficient funding available for this purchase. 3. To continue the City's efforts towards recycling it is desirable to use recycled paper to produce publications. Using recycled paper adds $0.0108 per page to the cost of the brochure, or $0.43 per 40 page book. Alternative Recommendation: 1. To choose one of the other bids from Artcraft Press Inc.: Base Bid A, Base B, or Alternate B. 2. The Council may choose to reject all bids and readvertise. However, this could affect the publishing date for the first brochure in 1991, and staff feels lower bids are unlikely. Discussion/Decision Mode: The bids received November 26, 1990 are to remain in effect for a period of 30 days. December 10 is the only Council meeting to fall within this time period. Should the Council not take action on December 10, or decide to readvertise, every effort should be made to award a contract prior to January 1, 1991, so necessary paperwork may be processed in a timely manner for issuance of the spring brochure.. Respectfully submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP/gb Attachment E 0 w z ° H ~ O~ ~ ~ ~ `~ W .N N '~ a '~~~0 a°° °~'~' w z° O H H U O U 0 O O .~ ro a~ a .,~ O E ~ o~ UO rn ~ O oz ~b voi oa O baa a~ o •~+ ~aia~i o ~ cn ~ ~~ td U Sa 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ O 3 D ~ .~ ~ ~ +~ ~ ~ ~ O~ U1 O ~~~ ~~~~ QUA ~ O ~ +~ u~i ,~ o ao ~ c~ aA }~ O ld ~ ~ ~ c0c~0c~d to ~ U O N N ~~~. . o+~o O O~v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°oo~ ~ 3 U M O ~ cd ~ t1~ .~ O A O ~ O O a~cNCU wU 00 N~ ~ O ~ •~ o ~Uw N e . cn a a~~b~ s~a~~a ~~A3 t7'O ~O ~ Gr ~ G oa°~ ~' v, `~ ~o +~ c~ b •~ ~~c~w c~OOW O~S~O ~ ~~~ a A c~ +~ oo~ +~ ~ •rl ~ ~ A~ ~ l~O~ U U O+ •~NO ~ a~ a N D N N to x~~ a~i 'G a~ ~ U E ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~UaU U x ~~ ~~G~ a~~~s~ a~io°°~ [~+ fs+ O Q N b ~ ~ c~~U0 O~~r0-I ,[ O Sa ~ HACTW +~ 0 a~ N a b O ~i ro c~ O Fa b b O -~ A O N a~ O 3 b A 0 O W O N ~ o b ~ ~ ~; ~ CC1 rn Q ~ ° ° Sri M z M ~ O °~ ~ ~ b ~ [A 04 W ~ '~ M z M OMi ,n in N O ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q ~ N M M M ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,O .~ ~''~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' N ('~ N ( ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ E H W W a N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~, U a +~ a o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ fd ~v ~ ~ 3 z 5c.-~ rn 0 O .a U N A N a~ a~ .~ O U c~ b a~ +~ A c~ O A 0 3 O b .r., .a x O U O A G. a O b ro a~ O ~ ~+ c~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ v .~ ~~ UU EU CITY OF RICHFIELD, MIDTNESOTA Council Letter No. 297 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Consideration of renewal of 1991 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Richfield Restaurant Acquisition Co. d/b/a Champps Sports Cafe, located at 790 West 66th Street. Background: lications On November 20, 1990, the city received the renewal app and other required documents for the On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Champps Sports Cafe. The applicant has paid the required .license fees. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: - The corporate structure of the organization remains unchanged from last year. Mr. Arthur E. Pew III remains the sole owner of the restaurant. Mr. Christopher McHugh became the new general manager in 1990 of the restaurant. Neither of-these individuals has any known criminal. record. - All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current. - The lease between the applicant and the property owner, Market Plaza Commercial Ltd., is in effect with all payments current. - The $10,000 bond issued by Great American Insurance Company has been submitted. - The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing Park Glen National Company as affording the required coverage.' Proof of workers compensation insurance coverage was also supplied. - An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement covers the period from October 1989 through October of 1990 and indicates that food sales accounted for 62$ of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for 38$ of the total sales. From December of-1989 through. November of 1990 there were 75 Public Safety contacts with Champps. This compares with 106 contacts for the pervious year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. Environmental health staff received six complaints in 1990 regarding Champps. One complaint was related to debris on the property. Four complaints related to grease/food odors were referred to Bloomington sanitarians. One complaint was a delivery that was being made before 7:00 a.m. These have all been resolved and no further complaints have been received by staff. ~- Since the February, 1990 incident of alcohol being served to a minor, public safety staff have conducted an undercover check of the establishment and found that officers were asked for proper identification. Police officers continue to conduct 5-6 weekly walk throughs of the establishment. Recommended Motion: Approve the issuance and renewal of the 1991 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Champps Sports Cafe. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both city codes and state statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the license requested. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The council could decide to continue the hearing; however, if the hearing is continued beyond January 1, 1991, the council should consider the granting of a license to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted. 2. The council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statute 340A.415, be based upon a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or suspended. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Champps Sports Cafe On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 10, 1990. These licenses expire January 1, 1991. Therefore, if the council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10, any subsequent hearing should be held before the ~.icenses expire. Respect lly Submitted, Jame Prosser City Manager JDP/bac ~a PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS DECEMBER 1989 THROUGH NOVEMBER 1990 CHAMPPS SPORTS CAFE Total Contacts Criminal Contacts "Bar Type" (Included in Crim. Contacts) Misc. Non-Criminal Assists Traffic/Parking Inspections/Licensing 1 g8 ~99g 106 75 24 41 (18) (22) 26 34 (47) (24) (9) (~) (0) (3) The criminal contacts for 1990 were 3 thefts, 2 auto thefts, 5 assaults, 3 disorderly/domestic incidents, 3 detox, 3 drunkenness, 4 vandalism, 1 exposer, 3 stolen property offenses, 2 miscellaneous ordinance violations, 7 noise complaints, 1 burglary alarm, 2 suspicious person, 1 juvenile alcohol/drug and 1 harrassing phone-call. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 298 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Renewal of 1991 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Consul Restaurant Corp., d/b/a Chi Chi's Mexican Restaurante, located at 7717 Nicollet Avenue South. Background: lications On November 16, 1990, the city received the renewal app and other required documents for the On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Chi Chi's Mexican Restaurante. The applicant has paid the required license fees. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: - The corporate structure of the. organization remains unchanged from last year. A copy of the list of officers and directors of the corporation is attached to this letter. Mr. Michael Davis became the new general manager in 1990 of the restaurant. None of these individuals has any known criminal record. - All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current. - The lease agreement between the applicant and the property owner, Maro-Max Company continues to be in effect with all lease payments being current. - The $10,000 bond issued by Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance Company has been submitted. - The required .proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing Northbrook Property and Casualty Insurance Company as affording the required coverage. Proof of workers compensation insurance coverage was also supplied. - An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement covers the period from October 1989 through September of 1990 and indicates that food sales accounted for 64$ of the total sales, while liquor sales accounted for 36$ of the total sales. From December of 1989 through November of 1990 there were 145 Public Safety contacts with Chi Chi's. This compares with 164 contacts for the previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. Environmental health staff received a total of 4 complaints in 1990. One complaint involved garbage and debris on the property. The other three were restaurant complaints which were investigated by Bloomington sanitarians and corrected. No other further complaints have been received by staff. ~-i Since the February 1990 incident of alcohol being served to a minor, public safety staff have conducted an undercover check of the establishment and found that officers were asked for proper identification. Police officers continue to conduct 5-6 weekly walk throughs of the establishment. Recommended Motion: Approve the renewal of the 1991 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Chi Chi's Mexican Restaurante. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both city codes and state statute pertaining to On-sale and Sunday Liquor licensing. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the renewal of the licenses requested. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The council could decide to continue the hearing, however, if the hearing is continued beyond January 1, 1991, the council should consider the granting of a license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor. until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted. 2. The council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statutes 340A.415, be based upon a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or suspended. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public. hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Chi Chi's Mexican Restaurante On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has .been scheduled for December 10, 1990. These licenses expire January 1, 1991. Therefore, if the council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10th, any subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses expire. Respec ully Submitted, Ja a ~D. Prosser Ci Manager JDP/bac ~~~ PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS DECEMBER 1989 THROUGH NOVEMBER 1990 CHI CHI'S MEXICAN RESTAURANTE Total Contacts Criminal Contacts 164 60 145 81 (31) 64 "Bar Type" (Included`in Crim. Contacts) (26) Misc. Non-Criminal 17 Assists Traffic/Parking Inspections/Licensing (76) (35) (10) (13) (1) (16) The criminal contacts for 1990 were 12 thefts, 3 narcotics offenses, 2 auto thefts, 4 assaults, 9 disorderly/domestic incidents, 2 juvenile liquor violations, 2 miscellaneous property crimes, 2 noise violations, 4 forgeries, 2 no pay, 2 vandalism, 3 burglary alarms, 3 drunkenness, 3 DWI, 1 bomb threat, 1 bike theft, 12 suspicious persons, 3 miscellaneous ordinance violations, 1 suspicious vehicle, 5 detox and 5 warrants. ~-3 [`ANC.:: R CTAURANT CORpnRATT[)N OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS ADDRE~_S ~~ William D. Etter 14845 Iron Wood Ct. President, (612) 934-1859 Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 Director James H. Crivits 3115 Runnymede Road Chairman, (502) 426-7388 Louisville, KY. 40222 Director Robert A. Lamp 3045 Eagandale Place (612) 681-1614 Eagan, MN. 55221 Theodore O'Shaughnessy 2108 25 1/2 Ave. S. (701) 232-6214 Fargo, ND. 58103 David C. Stevens (612) 893-0230 Larry K. Boe (414) 781-6434 Gen. A.P. MacDonald (701) 237-6030 Richard G. Marklund (612) 944-7660 Philip McLaughlin (612) 888-2271 E. Thomas Mitchell (612) 432-5896 7760 Atherton Way Eden Prairie, MN. 55344 17890 Wessex Drive Brookfield, WI 53005 Fraine Barracks P.O. Box 1817 Bismark, ND 58502-1817 3415 High Lane Long Lake, MN. 55356 6840 Point Drive Edina, MN. 55435 16445 Garner Ave. Rosemount, MN. 55068 V.P, Finance & Treas. & Sec. V.P. V.P. Director Director Director Director V.P., Legal, Secretary & General Counsel Consul Restaurant Corporation is a publicly held corporation whose shares are traded over the counter on 'the National Association of Securities Dealers national market system. To date Consul has 3,392 shareholders with no shareholder controling more than 5$ of the stock. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 299 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Consideration to Renew the 1991 On-Sale and Sunday liquor licenses for the Ground Round Inc., 1500 East 78th Street. Background: lications for On November 20, 1990, staff received the renewal app On-Sale and Sunday liquor licenses. for The Ground Round Inc. All required fees have been paid. Public Safety's investigation is complete and reveals the following: - There were two individuals added to the Board of Directors in 1990. They are: Michael P. O'Donnell, President and CEO and Charles F. Woodhouse, Vice-President. A copy of the list of officers of the corporation is attached to this letter. MrofR~hearestaurantcamNoneeofetheseeral manager in 1990 individuals has any known criminal record. - All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current. - The lease with A.G. Bogen (property owner) is in effect and all payments are current. - The $10,000 bond issued by American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company has. been submitted. - The required proof of liquor liability insurance coverage has been received showing. National Union Fire Insurance Company as affording the required coverage. Proof oflied. workers. compensation insurance coverage was also supp - A statement has been prepared and submitted by Maryanne Colleran Bowe, C.P.A. This statement covers the period from October 1989 through September 1990 and indicates0 that food sales accounted for 57$ of the total sales, while beer and wine sales accounted for 43$ of the total .sales. From December of 1989 through November of 1990 there were 27 Public Safety contacts with the Ground Round. This compares with 45 contacts for the previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. Environmental health staff received two complaints concerning a gate on the property that was to be replaced with fencing. A letter was sent to The Ground Round Inc. and the problem was resolved. There have been no other complaints received since then. g~l Since the February, 1990 incident. of alcohol being served to a minor, public safety staff have conducted an undercover check of the establishment and found that officers were asked for proper identification. Police officers continue to conduct 5-6 weekly walk throughs of the establishment. Recommended Motion: Approve the renewal of the 1991 On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for The Ground Round Inc. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both city codes and state statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday liquor licensing. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the renewal of the licenses requested. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The council could decide to continue the hearing, however, if the hearing is continued beyond January 1, 1991, the council should consider the granting of a license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be .conducted. 2. The council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any :suspension of revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statutes 340A.415, be based upon a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspension takes. effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or suspended. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of The Ground Round Inc. On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 10, 1990. These licenses expire January 1, 1991.. Therefore, it the council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10th, any subsequent hearing should be <held before the licenses expire. Respectfully Submitted, ~,. Jamey ~. Prosser City 'I~lanager JDP:bac $- ~ PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS NOVEMBER 1989 - NOVEMBER 1990 GROUND ROUND RESTAURANT 45 27 Total Contacts 23 11 Criminal Contacts "Bar Type" (Included in Crim. Contacts (12) (3) 0 16 Misc. Non-Criminal Assists 19 (12) Traffic/Parking 2 (2) Inspections/Licensing 1 (2) The criminal. contacts for 1990 were three .thefts, one bike theft, two disorderly/domestic. complaints, one suspicious person, one no pay, one robbery, one detox, and one miscellaneous ordinance violation. ~-3 Michael P. O'Donnell 520 Jerusalen Road Cohasset, MA. 02025 Robert G. King 5C Fulling Mill Lane Hingham, MN. 02043 Michael Robert Jorgenson 210 Frederick St. Paramus, NJ. 07652 Warren C. Hutchins 20 Charles Street Lexington, MA. 02173 3/17/56 3/21/46 10/01/52 4/23/44 President Sr. VP Vice-Pres. Vice-Pres. Charles F. Woodhouse 10/24/46 Vice-Pres. 2010 Pine Street Philadelphia, PA. 19103 `! CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 300 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Renewal of 1991•Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor Licenses for Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post 435, located at 6501 Portland Avenue South. Background: lications On November 16, 1990, the city received the renewal app and other required documents for the Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post 435. The applicant has paid the required license fees. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: - One new officer, Mr. Lee Hathaway,-was elected as a post officer in 1990. Mr. James Daly, Mr. Joe Pregler and Mr. George Evans continue to serve as the other three post. officers. Mr. Colin Fowler continues to serve as club manager. None of these individuals has any known criminal record. - All real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current. - The property and building continue to be owned by the American Legion. - The applicant has not supplied proof of liquor liability insurance coverage, and the $10,000 bond, but they have assured the City that as soon as their insurance agent and the managing board decide on which carrier will be affording the required coverage, a copy of a certificate of insurance detailing this coverage will be sent to the city before January 1, 1991. The applicant has supplied proof of worker's compensation coverage. An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement covers the period from December 1989 through November 1990 and indicates that food sales accounted for 44~ of the total sales, while beer and wine sales accounted for 56~ of the total sales. From December of 1989 through November of 1990 there were 37 Public Safety contacts with the American Legion. This compares with 59 contacts for the previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. The environmental health staff received one complaint in 1990 regarding the restaurant. Environmental health staff contacted Bloomington sanitarians and an inspection of the restaurant was q-~ conducted. NOhealth staffasincehave been received by environmental Recommended Motion: Approve the renewal of the 1991 Club On-Sale and Sunday .Liquor licenses for Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post 435. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both city codes and state statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday liquor licensing. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the invto denylthecrenewaldofttheelicenses requested. reaso Alternative Recommendation: 1. The council could decide to continue the he1991g'thewcouncilf the hearing is .continued beyond January 1, should consider the granting of a license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted. 2. The council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statutes 340A.415, be based upon a licable statutee licensee has failed to comply with an app rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspeno~~unitykes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opp for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic bevrevokedaor suspended, it is recommended that the licenses not Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Minneapolis-Richfield American Legion Post 435 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for Decemifrthe~counail These licenses expire January 1, 1991. Therefore, decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10th, any subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses expire. Respec lly Submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP/djg q~~ PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS NOVEMBER 1989 - NOVEMBER 1990 MPLS. - RICHFIELD AMERICAN LEGION POST 435 1989 1990 59 37 Total Contacts 30 23 Criminal Contacts "Bar Type" (Included in Crim. Contacts)(4) (10) 3 14 Misc. Non-Criminal 22 (5) Assists Traffic/Parking 4 (2) Inspections/Licensing 0 (7) The criminal contacts for 1990-were three thefts, one auto theft, three assaults, two disorderly/domestic incidents, one vandalism/damage to property, seven burglary/robbery alarms, one DWI, one detox, one susp. person, and three drunkenness. ~ -3 MPLS-RICHFIELD AMERICAN LEGION POST 435 OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Joe Pregler - President Lee Hathaway - Vice President Theodore Stage - Secretary James Daly - Treasurer George Evans ~d ---~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 301 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Renewal of 1991postbNon 5555,alocatedaatL710 LakecShore D~ivered Babcock V.F.W. Background: On November 19, 1990, the city received the renewal applications and other required documents for the Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses for Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555. The applicant has paid the required license fees. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: - The officer structure of the organization remains unchanged from last year. A copy of the list of officers is attached to this letter. Mr. Roy J. Hitchcock continues to serve as club manager. None of these individuals has any known criminal record. - All general sales, real estate and withholding taxes have been paid and are current. - The property and building continue to be owned by Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555. - The $10,000 bond issued by United Fire and Casualty Company has been submitted. - The applicant has not supplied proof of liquor liability insurance coverage, but they have assured-the City that as soon as their insurance agent and the managing board decide on which carrier will be affording the required coverage, a copy of a certificate of insurance detailing this coverage will be sent to the city before January 1, .1991. The applicant has supplied proof of worker's compensation coverage. - An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted. This statement covers the period from July 1989 through June 1990 and indicates that food sales accounted for 51~ of the total sales, while beer and wine sales accounted for 49$ of the total sales. From December of 1989 through November of 1990 there were 16 Public Safety contacts with Fred Babcock V:F.W. Post No. 5555. This compares with 31 contacts for the previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. ~ t~-1 The environmental health staff received one complaint in 1990 regarding a restaurant complaint. Bloomington sanitarians were notified. There have been no other complaints received since. Recommended Motion: Approve the renewal of the 1991 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor license for Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both city codes and state statutes pertaining to On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licensing. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation conducted, there appears to be no reason to deny the renewal of the licenses requested. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The council could decide to continue the hearing, however, if the hearing is continued beyond January 1, 1991, the council should consider the granting of a license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted. 2. The. council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statutes 340A.415, be based upon a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under Section 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It appears that the licensee has not committed any violation relating. to alcoholic beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the licenses not be revoked or suspended. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Fred Babcock V.F.W. Post No. 5555 Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 10, 1990. .These licenses expire January 1, 1991. Therefore, if the council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10th, any subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses expire. Respectfully submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP/bac ~ o-~ PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS DECEMBER 1989 THROUGH NOVEMBER 1990 FRED BABCOCK VFW-POST 5555 ~~ 31 16 Total Contacts 11 ~ Criminal Contacts "Bar Type" (Included in Crim. Contacts) (2) (3) 2 9 Misc. Non-Criminal 12 4 Assists 4 0 Traffic/Parking Inspections/Licensing 2 5 ~ The criminal contacts for 1990 were 2 thefts, 1 assault, 1 case of drunkenness, 1 shoplift and 2 suspicious persons. io-3 Club Manager's Name: Roy J. Hitchcock Names of Members of Managing Board: James P. Lawler Charles D. Thyr Thomas J. Goalen Richard D. Christie CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 302 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Renewal of 1991.On-Sale Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses for Davanni's Inc. d/b/a Davanni's Pizza and Hot Hoagies located at 2312 West 66th Street. Background On November 16, 1990 the city received the renewal applications and other required documents for the Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses for Davanni's Pizza and Hot Hoagies. The applicant has paid the required license fees. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: - The corporate structure of the organization .remains unchanged from last year. A copy of the list of officers of the corporation is attached to this letter. Ms. Constance Zweber continues to serve as the general manager of the restaurant. None of these individuals has any known criminal record. - All general real estate taxes, state sales and withholding taxes have been paid and are current. The building and property continue to be owned by Hwy #52 Embers Inc., and the lease agreement between the applicant and the landlord continues to be in effect with all payments current. - The applicant has supplied proof of liquor liability insurance coverage. This coverage indicates that Transcontinental Insurance Company is also affording the required liquor liability insurance coverage. The applicant has supplied proof of .worker's compensation insurance coverage. - An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted by Mr. Robert J. Stupka, C.P.A. This statement covers the period from September 1989 through September 1990 and indicates that food sales accounted for 91~ of the total sales, while beer and wine sales accounted for 9~ of the total sales. From December of 1989 through November of 1990 there were twenty Public Safety contacts with Davanni's as compared to sixteen contacts for the previous year. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. Environmental health staff received one complaint during this same time period that related to debris and garbage in the parking lot. Davanni's staff were notified and the problem was resolved immediately. No other complaints have been received since. Since the February 1990 incident of alcohol being served to a minor, Public Safety staff have conducted an undercover check of the establishment and found that officers were asked for proper identification. Recommended Motion: Approve the renewal of Wine and Non-Intoxicated Malt Liquor licenses for Davanni's Inc., d/b/a Davanni's Pizza & Hot Hoagies for 1991. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City codes and state statutes pertaining to on-sale wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor licenses. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and the investigation conducted, .there appears to be no reason to deny the renewal of the licenses requested. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The council could decide to continue the hearing however, if the hearing is continued beyond January 1, 1991, the council should consider the granting of a license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted. 2. The council could decide to suspend or revoke the licenses. Any suspension or revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statutes 340A.415, be based upon a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It is the opinion of the Public Safety Department that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the license not be revoked or suspended. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Davanni's Inc., d/b/a Davanni's Pizza & Hot Hoagies Wine and Non- Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses has been scheduled for December 10, 1990. Their current licenses expire January 1, 1991. Therefore, if the council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10th, any subsequent hearing should be held before the licenses expire. Respe~ lly Submitted, Jam s Prosser Cit anager JDP/djg (I~~ PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS NOVEMBER 1989 - NOVEMBER 1990 DAVANNI'S PIZZA & HOT HOAGIES 16 Total Contacts 12 Criminal Contacts "Bar Type" (Included in Crim. Contacts) (3) 1 Misc. Non-Criminal 3 Assists 0 Traffic/Parking 0 Inspections/Licensing 99 20 12 (7) 8 (2) (5) (1) The criminal contacts for 1990 were three repopossessionsCltwo mischief, one of theft, two Juv. Alcohol/Drug vehicle, one misc. susp. persons, one noise complaint, one susp. ord. viol. and one drunkenness. r~-3 DAVANNI'S PIZZA AND HOT HOAGIES Partners/Officer and Titles: Gladstone M. Stenson - President Roger W. Schelper - Vice President Robert W. Carlson - Treasurer David F. Koenig - N/A /~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 303 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Renewal of 1991.On-Sale Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses for Miller's Fireside Pizza, Inc. located at 6736 Penn Avenue South. Background: lications On November 8, 1990, the city received the renewal app and other required documents for the Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses for Miller's Fireside Pizza, Inc. The applicant has paid the required license fees. The Public Safety background investigation has been completed and reveals the following: - The corporate structure of the organization remains unchanged from last year. A copy of the list of officers of the corporation is attached to this letter. Mr. David Miller continues to serve as the general manager of the restaurant. None of these individuals has any known criminal record. - All general real estate taxes, state sales and withholding taxes have been paid ando nedcbrrthe•Millersuilding and property continue to be Y - The applicant has supplied proof of liquor liability insurance coverage. This coverage indicates that. Transcontinental Insurance Company is also affording the required liquor liibeaiproofsofaworkerVSrcompensation applicant has supp insurance coverage. - An accountant's statement has been prepared and submitted by Mr. Richard Ellsworth. of the George M. Hanson Company, P.A. This statement covers the period from September 1989 through August 1990 and indicates that food sales accountedsfaccounted for 7$tof theetotallsaleser-and wine wine sale From December of 1989 through November of 1990 there were five Public Safety contacts with Miller's as compared to three contacts for the previous year. Of these five contacts, three were of a criminal nature, and two were non-criminal contacts. A breakdown of these contacts is attached to this letter. There were no environmental health complaints received during this time period. a-1 Recommended Motion: Approve the renewal of the 1991 Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses for Miller's Fireside Pizza, Inc. Basis for. Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of both City codes and state statutes pertaining to On-Sale Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor licenses. 2. Based upon the information supplied by the applicant and thesonvto denylthecrenewaldofttheelicenses requested. rea Alternative Recommendation: however, if 1. The council could decide to continue the hearing, 1991, the council the hearing is continued beyond January 1, should consider the granting of a license extension to allow the applicant to continue to sell wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor until the rescheduled hearing can be conducted. 2. The council could decide to suspend or revoke-the licenses. Any suspension or revocation must, according to Minnesota State Statutes 340A.415, be based upon a finding that the licensee has failed to comply with an applicable statute, rule. or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages. The council must also note that no revocation or suspension takes effect until the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing under Sections 14.57 to 14.70 of the Administrative Procedure Act. It is the opinion of the Public Safety Department that the licensee has not committed any violation relating to alcoholic beverages and therefore, it is recommended that the license not be revoked or suspended. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing to consider the requests for the renewal of Miller's Fireside Pizza, Inc. Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor license has been scheduled for December 10, 1990. Their current licenses expire January 1, 1991. Therefore, if the council decides to continue the hearing beyond December 10th, any subsquent hearing should be held before the licenses expire. Respe lly Submitted, Jame Prosser City Manager JDP/dig ~ a- ~ PUBLIC SAFETY CONTACTS NOVEMBER 1989 - NOVEMBER 1990 MILLER'S FIRESIDE PIZZA ~9$~ Total Contacts 3 5 1 3 Criminal Contacts "Bar Type" (Included in Crim. Contacts) (0) (0) Misc. Non-Criminal 1 2 Assists 0 (2) Traffic/Parking 0 (0) .Inspections/Licensing 1 (0) The criminal contacts for 1990 were one suspicious person, one vandalism and one harassing telephone call. ~ a-3 MILLER'S FIRESIDE PIZZA, INC. Partners/Officers Name and Title: David J. Miller - President Lucille Miller -.Vice President Lucille Miller - Secretary David J. Miller - Treasurer ~3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 304 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Approval of an application for a temporary Wine and Non- Intoxicating Malt Lig8th StreeteinoRichfield.s Italian Buffet located at 500 East Background: received an application for a new On November 26, 1990, the city On-Sale Wine and Non-Intoxicating Maltlicationlfornnewfwinegand for Paesano's Italian Buffet. The app non-intoxicating malt liquor licenses is occurring as a result of a change in ownership that is anticipated to occur on January 1, 1991. It should also be noted that the required license fees have been paid. On all new wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor license applications, it becomes necessary to conduct extensive backgrounds on the applicants. Public Safety staff are currently in the process of conducting a complete background investigation on the new owners. However, the investigation will not be complete until approximately sometime after the first of the year. It then becomes necessary to seek an approval on a temporary wine and non-intoxicating malt liqu199i~candethe that between the sale of the business (January 1, council meeting of January 28, 1991, the establishment is licensed. Recommended Motion: Approve a temporary wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor license for Paesano's Italian Buffet and continue the herovegaupermanent January 28, 1991, at which time a request to app wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor license will be submitted for Council consideration. Basis of Recommendation: 1, The applicant has submitted all of the necessary documents to staff and has paid the necessary fees. 2, The required insurance binder has been-submitted. Alternative Recommendation: rant a temporary Wine and 1. The Council could decide not to g Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor license for Paesano's Italian Buffet. This would mean that after the sale of the business (January 1, 1991) until the council meeting of January 28, 1991, the establishment would be unable to legally serve wine or non-intoxicating malt liquor. _,.~ /3- Discussion/Decision Mode: Consideration of a request and Non-Intoxicating Malt Buffet is being presented for .the issuance of a temporary. Wine Liquor license for Paesano's Italian for City Council approval at this time. Resp ct ly Submitted, Jame Prosser City ager JDP/bac /~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 305 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: rovin .execution and delivery of Consideration of a resolution app 9 the first supplemental indenture of trust securing commercial development reve1987AeanddSeriesn1987B~rporate Travel building project) Series Background: The above referenced bonds have provided financing for the Corporate Travel building. The bonds are required to be purchased by the partnership owning the building on February 1, 1991. A notice to bond holders is intended to mailed to the trustee on December 14, 1990. A review of this issue by the attorneys for Corporate Travel indicated that an inconsistency in the indenture of trust for the bonds required clarification. Specifically, it is proposed that the bonds will again be purchased or remarketed on February 1, 1996. However, due to the definition of "stated mandatory purchase date" in the indenture of trust, the indenture could be construed to also require purchase on February 1, 1994. Such an interpretation would not be correct and would be inconsistent with the original purpose of the remainder of the indenture. A resolution clarifying this issue has been prepared for council consideration. Recommended Motion: Approve the resolution. Basis of Recommendation: Review of this matter by our attorney indicates that it would be appropriate to approve the attached resolution. The bonds have no recourse to the City of Richfield and the change has no impact upon the City of Richfield. Alternative Recommendation: Do not approve the resolution. Discussion/Decision Mode: This matter will be presented for council consideration at their meeting on December 10, 1990. Respectf ly submitted, Jame Prosser City M ager JDP:ds ly-~ DAVID .I. KENNEDY Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9232 December 6, 1990 Mr. James Prosser City Manager Richfield City Hall 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612)337-9300 Re: $4,755,000 Commercial Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (Corporate Travel Building Project) Series 1987A and Series 1987B (Remarketing) Dear Mr. Prosser: I have reviewed the Resolution and First Supplemental Indenture of Trust prepared by the Underwriter and Bond Counsel in the above transaction and find that they are in proper form for consideration by the City Council at its meeting on December 10, 1990. , The change in the Indenture is necessary because of an incorrect reference to the date on which the bonds can next be remarketed. The present holders must be notified by December 14th that they may either present their bonds for payment on February 1, 1991 or retain them until the next remarketing date. It is essential that the remarketing date they are informed of is the correct date as stated in the Indenture. 1 think it is desireable that the City Council consent to this technical change.. Nothing in the First Supplemental Indenture of Trust imposes moments made obligations on the City. The Bonds remain payable solely from the pay by Corporate Travel to the Bond Trustee. Very truly yours, C~~~ ~~l/ David J. Kennedy DJK:mj cc: John Dean ~~-~- LAW OFFICES LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD MICHAEL L. BERDE WILLIAM L. GREENE ' SUITE 2300 LOWELL V. STORTZ STEVEN L. BECTON IDNEY LORBER• ROBERT LEWIS BARROWS EET DOUGLAS B. GREENSWAG PETER H. BACHM DNEY BARROWS' KENT E. RIC HEV I r>O SpUTH FIFTH STR ELLEN G. SAMPSON MARL D. SIM PSON I HAROLD D. FIELD. JR.' RICHARD J. WEGENER MAVNAR D• - MINNESOTA SS4O2 IS NBURG BE RTRAND JAMES J ALLEN I. SAEKS' ' MVGH M. FREDERICK W. MORRIS , MINNEAPOL ROSANNE NATNANSON TH . MARK W. DELEHANTY THOMAS D. FEIN BERG SHERMAN• RIS M JOHN C. KUEHN TELEPHONE 1612) 335-1500 SHERRI L. KNU MICHAEL G. TAYLOR PETER E. SCHIFSKV FE . MOR GEORGE REILLY• BRADLEY J. GILLAN • JOHN W. GET SINGER LAWRENCE P. SCHAE T2 CHARLES K. DAYTON MICHAEL A. NEKICN ' FACSIMILE (612) 335-1657 THOMAS P. SANDERS RONALD J. SCMUL WOLS KI V COX' DAVID N MARTHA C. BRAND ROBERT ZEGLOVITCH . CAROLYN . STEPHEN R. pFLAUM• DAVID N. HAYNES TIMOTHY WELCH STEVEN J. RIN DSIG CHARLES A. MAYS' CARD LYN CMALMERS • GREGG J. GAVANAGH JAMA M. KRIZ LOWELL J. NOTEBOOM• JAMES V. ROTH GREGORY C. BROWN GEORGE F. McGUNNIG LE. JR.• ROBERT L. DtMAY BOHMANN M SUSAN M. ROBINER GEORGE B. LEONARD IiB ]219561 RICHARD G. PE PIN. JR . ANGELA TRAVIS' T P DEBRA G. STREHLOW H. STREET lIB ]]~196i1 ARTHUR L. FRED RIC T. ROSEN BLATT• . ROBER BULLAR D' JAMES G pEDER A. CARSON . GENE DICT DEINARD (199 9 196 9 1 BRRWN E. STARNS• MERMAN N H . JOSEPH M. FINLEY• 19 9 0 MICHAEL R. COHEN NANCY WILTGEN REIBE RT AMOS S. DEINARD IIB 9B ~19B5) . JOH RUYTER• LAWRENCE J. FIELD December 5 , CONE RGINIA 8 --- STEVEN D. DC JAMES R. DORSEY DAVID W. KE LLEY WEITZ' . yI CATHARINE BOSCHEE IRENE SCOTT KATHLEEN M. GRAHAM MARK 5. LILLEHAUG D L MICHELLE A. MILLER DANIEL D. FOTH STEPHEN J. DAVIDSON• • DAVI . TIMOTHY R. MEYE RSON RK DANIEL M. SATORIUS STEPHEN R. LITMAN IALN• ANGELAM. CH RISTY JENNIFER K. PA BLAKE SHEPAR D. JR. Or COUwSEt DAVID C. EDWARD M. MOERSFELDE R' MARK vwoFE 5D5 owu COwvOw ~T'Ows WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (612) 335-1542 VIA MESSENGER Mr. James Prosser City Manager Richfield City Hall 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 554.23 Re: $4,755,000 Commercial Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (Corporate Travel Building Project) Series 1987A and Series 1987B Dear Mr. Prosser: As I explained by phone, the above-referenced bonds which are financing the Corporate Travel Building are required to be purchased by the partnership owning the building on February 1, 1991. In that regard, a notice to bondholders is intended to mailed by the trustee on December 14, 1990. Upon review of matters this ambiguity or inconsistency in th h'ch needs to be clarified- morning, we discovered a certain e Indenture of Trust for the bonds for the required purchase and w i contemplated remarketing of the bonds. Specifically, it is proposed that the bonds will be again purchased and remarketed on February 1, 1996. However, due to the definition of "Stated Mandatory Purchase Date" in the Indenture of ld be construed to also require purchase Trust, the Indenture cou on February Insistent w th the eintent and purposesoof theoremainder would be inco of the Indenture. (~~J Mr. James Prosser December 5, 1990 Page 2 Accordingly, I .have enclosed a proposed form of resolution for the City Council to consider which would approve execution of the enclosed First Supplemental Indenture of Trust. Please note that by copy of this letter I am delivering the enclosed to David Kennedy and to First Trust National Association, who acts as trustee. If -there are any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, ,. --_ Kent. R chey KER/lms Encl. cc: David Kennedy, Esq. Ms. Laurie A. Howard (First Trust National Association) I y --~ RESOLUTION _~_ pppROVING EXECUTION U~RE DOF I TRUST F SECURING SUPPLEMENTAL INDENT SERIES COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENUILDINGU PROJECT)NG BONDS (CORPORATE TRAVEL B 1987A AND SERIES 1987B of Richfield, a political subdivision of the WHEREAS, the City issued its Commercial Minnesota (the "Issuer")~ orate Travel Building State of Bonds (Corp rincipal Development Revenue Refunding re ate p Project) Series 1987A and Series 1987 ursuant tog an .Indenture of amount of $4,755,000 (the "Bonds") P as of December i, 19g7~~between the Issuer and First Trust dated the proceeds of which were an Inc. (the "Indenture.). a Minnesota general Trust Comp Y- erties-Richfield, loaned to Dacotah Prop the "Company") to refund certain prior obligations of partnership the Issuer; and Ep,g pursuant to the Indenture., the Bonds are req redg9i WHER - an for remarketing on February be purchased by the Comp Y ~~ subject to the rights of and (the "First Mandatory Purchase Date ), current Bondholders to elect to retain their Bonds: Com any, the the P WHEREAS, as a result of a designation bu chase on February Bonds will be subject to a secopnu chasea Dat "P ; and 1, 1996 (the "Second Mandatory Com any has presented to tT ust sdated oaslof WHEREAS, the plemental Indenture of app ~~ lemental Indenture"), which amends the royal a First Supp. with respect to December 1, 1990 (the Supp an ambiguity or inconsistency and Indenture to clarify purchase Date occurs; the date on which the Second Mandatory the Indenture is permitted WHEREAS, the proposed amendment of without Bondholder consent pursuant to Section 801(a) to be made of the Indenture. BE IT RESOLVED by the Issuer that the NOW, THEREFORE, a roved, and the Mayor and City Supplemental Indenture is hereby PP es and modifications are hereby authorized and d uch Chang execute and delivei Manager with s such approva the Supplemental Indenture, Manager shall approve, or and City on execution of the Supplemental thereof as the May iven up being deemed conclusi or Yand City Manager; provided that in the Indenture by the May ~~-S - absence of the Mayor or City Manager, any persons duly authorized to act in their stead may so act with respect to the foregoing. Dated: December 10, 1990. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA i By Mayor ATTEST: Clerk 2 I~-~ FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST dated as of THIS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST, a olitical December 1, 1990, between the City of Richfield, p subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the "Issuer") and First Trust National Association, a national banking association (the "Trustee"). R E C I T A L S: WHEREAS, the Issuer issued its Commercial Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (Corporate Travel Building Project) Series 1987A and Series 1987B in the aggregate principal amount of $4,755,000 (the "Bonds") pursuant to an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture") dated as of December 1, 1987 between the Issuer and the Trustee (f/k/a First Trust Company, inc.), the proceeds. of which were loaned to Dacotah Properties-Richfield, a Minnesota general partnership (the "Company") to refund certain prior obligations of the Issuer; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Indenture, the Bonds are required to be purchased by the Company for remarkesubge t to bther rights9of (the "First Mandatory Purchase Date ), 7 current Bondholders to retain their Bonds; and WHEREAS, as a result of a designation by the Company, the Bonds as remarketed on the Firs urchase n February Dat19961(the subject to a second mandatory p "Second Mandatory Purchase Date"); and WHEREAS, the Company and Issuer desire to amend the Indenture to clarify an ambiguity or inconsistency with respect to the date on which the Second Mandatory Date occurs; and WHEREAS, the ~ Bondh ldernconsentf pursuante to Sectionr801(a) to be made withou of the Indenture. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows: SPCtion 1. The de Indenture isshereby amended to tread inaits in Section 101 of the entirety as follows: ""Stated Mandatory Purchase Date" means February 1 of each of the following stated years that occurs on or prior to the February 1 which next follows the Company's designation of the Conversion Date: 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006 and 2009." i~=~ 7 Section 2. All provisions of the Indenture, as amended by the foregoing, shall continue in full f °confirmed andtratifiedll terms thereof as so amended being hereby Section 3. This First Supplemental Indenture of Trust shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota; may be executed in one or more counterparts, with each counterpart constituting a single and original instrument; may not be amended or assigned except icnaandrinure with the terms of the Indenture, shall be binding up to the benefit of effectivesasrofathe dat Whereof a parties hereto; and shall become IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA By Mayor By City Manager ATTEST: Clerk FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By Its CONSENT The undersigned hereby consents to the foregoing amendment of the above-described Indenture. DACOTAH PROPERTIES-RICHFIELD By General Partner 215\Corp\Sup.ind ~~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 306 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Consideration of a resolution authorizing an amendment to documents relating to the city's $8,250,000 multi-family housing revenue bond (Market Plaza housing project) issued as of September 1, 1986. Background: Market Plaza limited partnership has asked the City of Richfield to approve the amendment of certain documents relating to the bonds referenced above. The amendments would enable the City to cure an existing default under the bond documents. The amendments will not affect the bonds as revenue obligations of the city, which are payable only from project revenues. The bonds were initially issued in 1985 to finance the construction of a Market Plaza housing development. Bond documents provided that on September 1, 1990 and September 1, 1995 the bonds are to be purchased from the proceeds of a remarketing of the bonds. But if that remarketing fails for any reason, the trustee is to draw on a letter of credit to pay the purchase price. The September 1, 1990 remarketing failed. The failure was primarily due to Moody's investor service refusal to confirm the rating on the bonds in light of Midwest failure and certain positions taken by the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) as successor to Midwest. The trustee drew on the letter of credit to pay the purchase price of the bonds tendered for purchase and the RTC became the owner of the majority of the bonds. The failed remarketing and the resulting draw on the letter of credit resulted in default of the bond documents. RTC has indicated its intention to exercise its remedies against the company unless the bonds are remarketed. Since September 1, RTC has clarified certain positions so that Moody's is now willing. to confirm the rating on the bonds. Piper Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. as the remarketing agents for the bonds, is now willing and apparently able to remarket the bonds. The RTC will permit remarketing to cure the default on the bond documents, but only if the indenture is amended to reduce the interest rate on the bonds to the current rate and make the next mandatory tender date September 1, 1994 rather than 1995. The city is not obligated for any aspects of this financing. Recommended Motion: Approve the resolution. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Advice of attorney. 2. The amendments are appropriate and do not create .any financial liability for the City of Richfield. -s-~ due to the Midwest position in this relate to the Market P aza 3, The default was primarily matter and did not directly housing limited partnership. a royal of the resolution, however there Alternative Recommendation: The Council could deny PP doesn't. appear to be cause to do so. 1 be presented for action at the City Council Discussion Mode: This matter wil meeting of December 10. Respect lly submitted, Ja s D. Prosser City Manager JDP:tm ~~ Z HOLMES & GRAVEN ('HANTERI:D 470 Pillsbury (enter, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 BARBARA L. PORTWOOD Attorney at Law Telephone (612) 337-9300 M~acsimile 1612) 337-931U Direct Dial (612) 337-9213 December 6, 1990 VIA FAX Mr. James Prosser City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 $8,250,000 Re: City of Richfield, Minnesota Multifamily Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Market Plaza Housing Project) Dear Mr. Prosser: ket Plaza Housing Limited Partnership (tcert n docut'mentsarelating totythe Mar Richfield to approve the amendment o ca tinned bonds (the "Bonds"). As describer ldefaults undeb t e Bond docudments. P to cure ex><s g would enable the Company The amendments will not affect therevenues a d ohoerdmoneys pledgedlunder the the City payable only from project Bond documents. Back_ °und e Cit of Richfield issued Bonds in 198c ~ any nThe Bonds were securedtby Th Y Development by the P Market Plaza Housing Midwest Federal Savings and Loan a collaterialized Letter of Credit issuedtheir terms were subject to mandatory Association ("Midwest"). The Bonds, by 1995. The Letter of tender for purchase on September 1, 1990 and September 1, Credit expires in 1995. The Bond documents provide that on the to bem urchased from thetproceeds of9a mandatory tender dates, the Bonds are P remarketing of the Bonds, but that if the remarketing fails for any reason, t e dit to ay the purchase price. The Trustee is to draw on the Letter of C because Moody's Investors Service September 1, 1990, remarketing failed, largely sed to confirm the rating on the Bonds in light of Midwest's failure and certain refu 5-3 December 6, 1990 Page Two ositions taken by the Resolution Trust Corporation ~"R' the purchase price of p orit of the Midwest. The Trustee drew on the Letter of Credit o pay Bonds tendered for purchase and and Rthe result ngt draw on the Let er of Crded~s Bonds. The failed remarketing constitute a default under the e a ainst the Company unless the Bonds are now intention to exercise its remed g remarketed. Since September 1, the RTC has clarified certain of its positi Jaffra ha&Mgopw'ood now willing to confirm the rating on the Bonds. Piper, y arentl Incorporated as the remarketi ThegR,TC will permts the remarkeg ng d o pcureduce able to remarket the Bonds. default under -the Bond docu d5 to aucurrentf marked rate and t emaketthe next the interest rate on the Bon. mandatory tender date September 1, 1994 rather than 1995. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me. Sincerely, G I a 0~.1~G'L~' (,,,rJr,,.a(,rl Barbara L. Portwood ec: Bruce Palmborg John Dean Mike Gould ~ 5 - ~-) CITY OF RICHFIELD 8esolution No. _- AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE CITY'S $8,250,000 MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (MARKET PLAZA HOUSING PROJECT) ISSUED AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1985 WHEREAS, the City of Richfield (the. "City") has previously issued its $8,250,000 Multifamily Housing Reof Trust (the("~ndenturea) dated as of September 'Bonds") pursuant to an Indenture 1, 1985, between the City and First Trust National Association (formerly First Trust Company, Inc.); and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Bon uant tolaaLoanoAgreementa(the Loan Limited Partnership (the Company) purs Agreement") dated as of Septemand consgructeon ofna 166 un t multi fam~ly rental order to fiance the acquisition housing facility in the City (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Bonds were secured by a letter of credit the (the "Letter of Credit") issued by Midwest Federal Savings an sLSecuritsoAgreem(entland Fixture by a Mortgage, Assignment of Rents and Lease , Y Financing Statement dated as of September 1, 1985 from the Company in favor in the Trustee; and WHEREAS, Midwest has band thee RTC is thersuccessor bt tMidwest with Trust Corporation .(the RTC ) respect to the Letter of Credit; and WHEREAS, on August 31, 1990, a Trausteeldrew on the Letterkof 1 Credit to Bonds on a Mandatory Tender Date, the pay the purchase price of the Bob the owner of such Bonds; andthat date and not remarketed, so that the RTC is n WHEREAS, the Company has requested that the City approve certain amendments to the Indenture and related Bond documents in order that the Bonds may be remarketed; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE TA AS FOLLOWS: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESO 1. The City hereby approves the execution and delivery of a Supplemental Indenture of Trust which amends thelemental Indentureetoothe next the date of execution and delivery of such Supp Mandatory Tender Date to a for Se temberel,n 994, andemakeu ther modifieat on next .Mandatory. Tender Dat P requested by the RTC, in a form approved by the Mayor and the City Attorney. 2. The Mayor andemental Indent elide cribed above and to execute and directed to execute the Suppl ~s-~ other documents or amendments approved by the deliver, on behalf of the City, any to ermit the Bonds to be remarketed. In Mayor and City Attorney and necessary P out the the event that either the Mayor or the City Cle~ tuber of lthe City Council of execution of the documents described herein, any the City shall be authorized to With full force andleffectclwhich executions shall execution on behalf of the City be valid and binding on the City. Adopted: December 10, 1990 Mayor Attest: City Clerk i ~- ~ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) s.s. CITY OF RICHFIELD ) I, Thomas Ferber, being the duly appointed and acting City clerk of the City of Richfield, do hereby certify that the attaNTeSd RELATING TO • THE 3 "AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO DOCUME -_-^ .,r.~Tr.e ~nir e R KF.T PLAZA $8,250,000 MUL'1't~t~mii..~ ,_~~~__._ -- HOUSING PROJECT) ISSUED AS OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1985," is a true and correct copy of said original Resolution on file in my office. Singed and sealed by my hand this _ day of December, 1990. Thomas Ferber City Clerk (SEAL) i~ MINNESOTA CITY OF RICHFIELD, Council Letter No. 1990 Agenda December 10, Issue Statement: and denial of award of Acquisition of photocopier for Printshopand Administrtion. photocopier contracts for Public Safety "Request for Proposals" for Backgrounds issued a Eight Earlier this fall tneBidsywere opened on October 1The minutes three photocopiers. iers. vendors submittaninldareoattachedferent cop from the bid op g copiers located lace existing All three The photocopiers are intended to rand Administration. in the Print Shop, Public Safety, purchases are budgeted items for 1991. rint shop- This rental The City is now renting a copier for the P owns the copier lggp• The City agreement expires on December 31, lic Safety. This copier has exceeded Wesareeexperiencing in Pub ier will be rated by the manufacturer and consequenTh s cop' The an unacceptable number of breakdowns. ier in Administration. traded-in. The City also owns the cop Dint where this copier copying volume has grown to the p monthly This is causing more breakdowns than should be is overusen•addition, this copier does not do two-sided copying. normal. I zed based on the The cost of the various aideaaoon thetm nuteslfrom some don't- total bid amounts which PP lies, opening. Some of the bid totals include supp some bids include service esr orlmontha numbers of Further, copies, some for a set number per Y uire les" comparison, the total cost to acq les to app ears was computed. The cost To do an "aPP ier for three Y and operate each cop' ro ections for the number copies calculations are based on staff p J ier. Further consideration of s~pVedlto be to be run on each .cop' Dint as they P The ier bids was set aside at thieted for the copiers. the cop' beyond the amounts budg liance with the considerably iers remaining copiers were then reviewed for com ifications. Demonstrations of several of the cop' City s spec city staff. were attended by The .results of this review are as follows: 1, Print Shop Copier: ro osals which met Staff studied the three lowest cost P P ier being rented s ecifications. The lowest Thishisethercopis for the P purchase of the Kodak 22 by the City. Monroe Systems for Business. The lowest bid was submitted by in Seed This copier does not uiredtminimummspeedpis setpat 70 copies requirement. The req ~~-I ier slows to 63 copies per minute per minute. The Monroe cop The document feeder is ~= when the document feedareiaocument is to be copied., This used when a multiple P 9 ority of copying done on type of work constitute1erhe This copier is in almost the Print Shop photocop' A slower copier will constant use during the work day. lete each roductivity by increasing the time to comp time reduce p job. At peak times it would alWhen staffedeterminednthat the to use the copier. Therefore, further ier did not meet the speed specifications, Monroe cop review was not undertaken. 2. Public Safety Copier: Of the seven copiers proposed which fell withThetremaingng~ six do not meet copying speed requirements. anion of staff, meet the City's copier does not, in the oP~ staff feels that this copier space. requirement. In addition, uality of photographs is difficult to operate and the copy q (particularly mug shots) is unacceptable. 3. Administrative Copier: Of the four copiers proposed which fell within The remaining three do not meet copying speed requirements. copier does not meet space requirements and is difficult to operate. Recommended Motion: .hat the attached resolution, whikhandadeclinesctotawardfor the T be adopted. Print Shop copier to Eastman Ko a contracts for the other copiers based on the bids, Basis for Recommendation: urchased for the 1, Staff recommends that the Kod~easonser be p Print Shop for the following This roposal is the lowest bid meeting specifications. • P • The copier has proven to be very reliable and meets staff needs. • The 1991 Central Servicesthedget contains $20,000 for t e rant shop, and $7,000 for the purchase of a copier foer• P maintenance of the cop' . Staff recommends that a finisher unit be added to the Koda n o tion to buy. We expect 2 The copier on a trial basis wltroductivity of the copier. that this will add to the p finisher will "jog" completed sets of ditu~antalso staple s do not have to be manually separated. sets of documents. The purchase of this add-onsonfundsswere anticipated when the 1991 budget was prepared, However, the Central Services fundthes not earmarked for it. urchase. In additiofor a sufficient resources to make the p finisher would serve to reduce manual labor necessary number of copying jobs. ~ ~-2 not be 3. Staff recommendssthat a copier for Public Safe y time because none of the copiers bid met purchased at thi both specifications and budgeted amounts. However, the Public Safety copier endations,tstaffrwillcdraft If the Council adopts these recomm rice quotes and revised specifications, seek written p recommend a copier purchase to .the Council in the near future. 4, Staff recommends that a copier for Administration not be urchased at this time because riOamountshe copiers bid met P b th specifications and budgete 0 Because the bids indicate ilablenondsmallecopiersdwithiPyoug speed is not currently ava urchase be 1991 budgeted amounts, staff recoomm~hescurrenthcopier is not delayed. While the reliability h alone to good, it is still acceptable and not reasointroduced and change. New copier models are frequentlallow us to acquire waiting until later in 1991 or 1992 may the two-sided copying speed desired. Alternative Recommendation: The finisher unit for the Kodak the purchase and bid award. copier could be eliminated from ~c~^^lDecision Mode: Council action to awarditactiontiscto be delayededCouncil should December 10 meeting- Is current rental agreement for the Print be aware that the City rental cost for Shop copier expires on December 31. The monthly plus this copier, should it have to be extendeVendors~are•Orequired to $.009 per copy (.approximately $675.001991. honor their bids through February 7, Respectfully submitted, Jam D. Prosser City Manager JDP:ds I~-3 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PRINT SHOP PHOTOCOPIER WHEREAS, pursuant to an adveroienednand tabulatedraccording to photocopiers, bids were received, P law; WHEREAS, the bid of MonroebiddermforotheuPrintsShopMendota Heights, Minnesota, the lowest photocopier, is rejected as not responsive to the specifications; and WHEREAS, it appears that Eastman Kodak of Minnetonka, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder for the Print Shop photocopier; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota: ro osal dated October 10, 1990, of Eastman Kodak 1, That the p P for a Ektaprint 225 photocopier and maintenance is hereby accepted; manager are hereby authorized and 2. That the mayor and city directed to enter into a contrac1991thinatheanamedof theMCitytofka, Minnesota, effective Januaryitems and amounts• Richfield for the following a. Purchase of Ekta2r482.505 Photocopier for an amount not to exceed S2 , b. Maintenance agreement for the servicing of the copier for an amount nofo °thecfirst70weOveemonthshofnthe $.0068 per copy agreement andhe~nlocaleunitseoftgovernmentSamanda es offered to of c. Rental of a 225AF Finisher for a period of up to three months for an amount not to exceed 5190.00 per month. manager is hereby authorized to enter into a Minnesota, effective 3. That the city contract with Eastman Kodak of Minnetonka, items following the rental perioCl~f of Richfieldmforhtheefollowing above., in the name of the Y and amounts: a. Purchase of a oo5AFandnisher for an amount not to exceed 52,380• b. Maintenance agreement for the servicing of tteer month finisher for an amount not to exceed $105.00 p for the remainder er atethelsamerrates offeredato renewable thereaft other local units of government. ~ t~ - ~i the City declines based on the proposals received, 4, That, and Administrative ~s request for proposals due to award a contracteCifiedeinuthe Cityety in excess of available Services copiers sP onsive bids are to the fact that all resp funds; authorized and directed to That the city clerk is hereby osits made with their bids, 5• Eastman Kodak, return forthwith to all bidders the dep until a contract has been xce t that the deposit of the successful bidder, e P Minnesota, shall be retained Minnetonka, signed. of Richfield, Minnesota Passed by the city council of the City this 10th day of December, 1990• Steven J. Quam, Mayor ATTEST: Ferber, City Clerk Thomas P. i ^~ I U I ~ U U U ~ ~ M a ~ t p ~ ~ U N I •~ ,~ •,i ~ '~ b `~ N ~ a a •~+ N ~ ~ N to i a N ~ ~ ~ w w N w ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ o o~ A Q A x A U 1 ~ I d~ p d~ O M ~ O N CO ~ m m °~ ~ II II (0 i ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ O ~O <` ~ ~ ~ 1 ~1 (~ M , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ i ~ II ~ 11 ) ~ Lt7 r-I a I 1 l ~ rl ~ 1 ~ O S•+ I ~ 1 ~ I ~ I r ~ d~ N O p~ d' '~ I I O i ~ ~ + I 3 N N ~ ~ ~ I O~~ U1 U r.7 U I ~ p ~ ~ O ~ ~ M ~ r-I [~ I •rl I ~O 00 ~ ~ Cp ~ rl O ~ I ~1 I ~ i ~ ~ m ~ o `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ I°n In i ai a 1 0D 1~ ~ - ~ 1 I I rl c~ ~ I N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d' ~ 0 I I it II ~ i [~ '"{ M O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N t ~ I 1 d~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ '..I 00 R3 II O ~ ~ a ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ p ~ Ln to I ~ ~ ij ~ ~ „ i a „ ~ ~ i ~ ~ O O ~ O o d' r' ~o ~ ~ O ,}~ ~ 1 L~ ~ roal x cn 1 c• Z Z ^ U i W w w w ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ 2 Z 1t O N i ~ ~ ~ ~ I U ~ £ ~ N O ~ U ~ ~ E i I ~ ~ O N O ~ •~ p 0 p ~ O U I ~ i ~ O ~ ~ w ~ ~ a a~ X ~ 3 w ~ i ~, ~ 0 ~ w ~ -~ ~ ~ O rn aO ~ i In ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a O ~ ~ cn o: O rl U £ N U U U r+ N a x I N N a O 1 N I w a w O x DC o ~ H x x cn cn A A o x A a z A A w a w G i cn O O x ~ U U ~ ~ a m i x ~ O X a a v v V U O M ~ a N ~ I b N N U N N }.> }~ ~ ,p d, z3 'p U U U p N N ~ ~ 3 ~~ b ~ N N b N N N U U U ~~~ N O p N O ~~~~ ~ I r~-I L+ W N W ~+ ~ i 0 U U O O ~ g 0 0 0 U; H A A a C] La Q p G O II N 1 d~ to O~ O ~ 00 ~ pOp N ~ II cd i o a, 0~0 t~ O ~ r N ~ [~ 'C5 U I ~ ~ .-i N ~ ~ ~ N M ~I ~ I~ ri N N N N N N H a I d, r-I o r-I t.2S ~~ I~ H ~ r-I H O N O ~-•I 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ In O ft1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I O[~i ~~ I M ~ N 1 3 ~ I ~ In N a U I~ m ~ ~ U -~ N ~ M c0 (Q I N I l~ ~ ~ O N U I C~1 1 0 N N m N N N N M ~ ~ 1 I N N N N ~ ~-I I I rl Ry H In D+ cd I d~ d+ M rl O R3 ~ ~ [~ fd d~ LA rl M 1~ I C~ ~ O ~ M ~ ll7 f0 U I ~ ~ ~ ~ d~ Op DO N M ~ jj a t e N N N N M M ~ II I Q II b I to O l!') O O ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wr ~ I r I ~. ~ N i 2 Z z Z Z z z c• c• r U ~ Uaj O I O ~ I m p O ~ I N ~ to 1 ~ O ~ ~ Gy .-i I ca O t!7 ~ N I Ca 1,C) H a+ a o~ x ~ X~ w z A E tx0 i 0 a O ''a td a U ~ IOrI rn w S I N a E' a '~ i U N I H ~ ,.,Ica w ~ o O x ,c x H p' a w a a a o a B o a z v E "o o w o a > l a ~ 3 E ca H x ~ x i~-~ I U U U rn ~ N O r"I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O p p O O Q,, ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x x x x x y i W ~ ~ ~ U U p U U U U ~ ~ V I A F A A O O O O O O I to O 11 N I .-1 N ~ N t` O I!') II (d I O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ii U I d; ~ ~ ~ ~ °' t II S-I I 00 O~ O~ O ~ rN„I ~ H H II ~ I II L~+ I II II I I H ~ to O H O H H O II I ~ I r"I O L~ O II i ~ I Lta ~ O~ O II ~ ~ ~ i O +~ O W I H ~ (~ I O R1 I M ~ ~ ~ U `~ -~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ M M M I N I o0 O M [~ O I!7 ~ O ~ I CQ 1 rn OH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ I i ~ M I I ~ ~ O O ~ ii ~ I ~ ~ II ~ I t~ ~ N N~ lHp ~ OH ~~„ ~ ri II C+ I ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ 1 ~ O O ~ N ~ ~ rl ~-i r-I H H ~ II I ~ II I Q II ~ I II O I M ~O OM M M M M I~ tO n p, l a ~n I u (~• I U N a~ z 2 Z Z c. ~• c• ~. r Q ~ ~ i M ~ I O I ''~ p In a I °' ~ M I H ~ I In A ~ d~ w b~ o ~4 F a A ~ ~ OU ~ i A ~ ~ ~ O ~ \ I M -~ ~ N O O `o H p i a ~ o o ~ v o In o ~ I a ~ E' N a ~ ~ ~ x N I ~ ~ H !/) (p A H 'LS I 0' W • ('~ O A A I a ~ ~ H ~ x Q C I E V 3 a ~ O ~ x x i~~ MINNESOTA CITY OF RICHFIELD, I (p~8 Bid Opening October 10, 1990 11:00 A.M. 3 photocopiers a meeting of the 1015, City Clerk, uirements of ResolutThomas•P. Ferber, Pursuant to re9 was to receive, Administrative Staff wasuraosedofythe meeting as Advertised in who announced that thbids for 3 photocopiers, open and read aloud, tember 26, 1990. the official newspaper on Sep City Clerk ment Director Present: Thomas Ferber, Community Develop Byron Wallace, City Manager Representative Eileen AndersoData Processing Manager Sally Morton, John Holter, Central Services Technic an following bids were submitted and read aloud: The --- VENDOR NAME & ADDRESS Monroe Systems Mendota Heights g~~ Securib~ 5~ Cashiers Check Alternate #1 Flonroe Systems Bid Security: Metro Sales, Inc. Minneapolis g~Security: Cashiers Check Xerox Corporation Edina Eid Security: 5~ Bi.d Print Shop Copier Pub. Safety Copier CppierMocSe-: RL970DX RL955DX pental Bid: No Bid No Bid tease Bid: 15 , 27 5.02 12,377.60 purchase Bid: 12 , 020.00 9 ,7 40.00 RL 945DX Copier Mode-: - No Bid Rental Bid: 10,115.57 tease Bid: 7,960.00 purchase Bid: ref -,Aodel: FT7 810 FT5590 pental Bid: 24 , 97 5.36 13,140.00 tease Bid: 24 , 027.48 13,164.84 purchase Bid: 22 ,995.00 10,328.00 Copier Model: 107 5 6052 q~ntal Bid: No Bi d 30,044.83 Wee Bid: 56,214.12 28,529.13 purohsee Bid: 39,320.00 13 ,800.00 Copier ~Aode-: 1090 RL932DX No Bid 6_-- 3 4,975 00 FT5540 8,460.00 8,942.40 6,692.00_ .~-- 5046 -- 14,507.86 ~_ 14,044.55 ~_ 8,210.00 _~- Alternate #1 Xerox ~WB~; 82,058,00 Wse Bid: 82 080.36 ~~~ B~; 62 ,7 25.00 " &d Securib: ,w. bid Tabu a ion: October 10,1990 ~ m. Serv. Print Shoe Copier Pub. Ss1eb Copier Zo ler VENDOR NAME & ADDRESS ~~ - 85 _, '~astman Kodak :nnetonka Security: 5X Bid Bond Alternate #1 Kodak Bid SecurrtY: Wagers Inc. St. Paul Bid Security: (IOS) International Office Systems Mendota Heights t~idsecurity~ Cashiers Check Alternate #2 IOS did Secur~y: Alternate #3 IOS Bid Security: A B Dick Minneapolis Copier Model: 225 Rental Bid: 55 980.00 ~e Bid: 46 97 4.24 ~r~ Bid: 2 2 , 48 2.50 Cppier Model: 235 Rental$id: 69 , 444.00 use &d: 67 367.08 purchase Bid: 34 825.00 Copier Model: No B i d Rental Bid: Vase Bid: Purdwe ~~ - ~pier Model: Canon 9800 Rental Bid: 45 , 038.5 2 Lsase &d: 44,255.52 purchase Bid: 36 , 263.00 spier Model; Canon 8580-50 Renta~i Bid: 32,710.68 t~sase Bid: 32 ,141.52 ~r~Bid; 26,337.00 C Model; Canon NP 8580 Ret~ B~; 30 ,003.12 Wse Bid: 29 , 481.12 ~~~ B;d : 24,157.00 C,op{er Model: - RsnW ~~ L~aee Bid: purdwe Bid: ____ 9.890.00 90 _.._-- 2b,9~64'~0 27,199.64 .~-- 12,792.50 18,608_00 - 11 318.00 10,050.00 Canon NP 6650 15,512.76 15,242.76 12,490.00 325/month -- 11,651.51 9,950.00 6.2_ 59.24 9,415.00 90 ~---- 18,756.00 ~--- 20,359.64 _._-- 12~792,50 7910 8 719.70 5 , 915.88_ ~--- 5.2..-._= ~ -- Canon NP 4835 9,883.80 9,712.08 7 ,958.00 185/month .~--~•-~ 6,844.50 .~--- 5,850.00 ~, ,,t~writy: 5~ Bond Bid T~letion: 3 YnvuxvF+~a~ ~ - v .October 10,1990 ier p„d in.5erv. r ~ Print Shop Copier Pub. Safety Cop o ie VENDOR NAME & ADDRESS 7500 7065 C,~r ~Aodal: 7 90 7 241.05 r.r~P thfield Renal ~~ 14 289.84 10 921.20 40 311 6,190.44 13,356.00 Wee Bid: . 10, 090.10 5 11,276.70 purt~hsfe &d: 8,650.00 , d Security: C+~ Modei~ 7 640 ' Alternate ~1 CDP + 15 048.53 17 .00 , penal &d: W~ 8id: 16 , 08 4.50 p~rq~e &d: 13 , 603.7 0 Sid Sea^b' unced that the bids WOCounciltMeetinga and The City Clerk anno 1990 City considered at the November 26, City Clerk Thomas P. Ferber 1~ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINN08 TA Council Letter No. 1990 Agenda December 10, Issue Statement: City Manager, Consideration of a Res~hetCitytofaRichfieldLetter o Understanding between adjusting compensation. Background: usting the Mayor Quam has requested that a resolution add 800 was effective it Manager be placed on the December 10, compensation of the C The current salary of $75, 1980 council agenda. Manager was appointed to the September 1, 1989. The City position in July, 1986. Recommended Motion: None. 1990 agenda for Council Discussion Decilaced onethe December 10, This has been p consideration. Respectfully submitted, EJA:ttf ~ -~- I RESOLUTION N0. ENDING THE LEJpMES D.UpROSSER N CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION AM BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND the City Council of the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: win sections of the Lettarand JamessDanPro ser, The folio 9 Minneso between the City of Richfield, dated July 14, 1986, is amended as follows: rees to pay employee for his Section 5, Salary: Employer a9 rendered pursuant here to an aanable aneinstallments at services tember 1, 1990, p Y aid. $ effective Sep to ees of .the employer are p the same time as other emp Y Council of the City of Richfield, Passed by the City 1990, Minnesota, this 10th day of December, Steven J. Quam, Mayor ATTEST: Ferber. City Clerk Thomas P. f8 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 309 Agenda, December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Setting a date for the 1991 Local Board of Review. Background: Assessor shall Minnesota Statute 274.01 provides that the County for the establish a date for Local BOSSmentfofepropertyhwithin each purpose of reviewing the asse in Hennepin County. The meetings are to be hel respective city 31 and must be preceded by at least 10 T e between March 1 and May days published notice before the date of the first mseofnthe Board of Review must complete its worunlessla longer period of first local Board meeting .each year, time is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. xowever, the Commissioner will not issue an extension past May 31. Assessor has recommended Monday, April 29, 1991, as The County the date of the 1991 Local Bdato begRnvatw7m00tpnm•foThelCityeof. The meeting will be schedule the last Monday in Richfield held its Board of Review meeting April last year also. Approximately a month prior to the Local Board of Review meeting, the Administrative ServicessDinedtto Richfield willhbriefnCouncil County Assessor s office as g rocess and of typical cases that Members on the Board of Review p may come before the Board. Recommended Motion: Council confirm the County It is recommended that the City A ril 29, 1991 at 7.00 p.m. for Assessor's selection of Monday, P the Board of Review meeting. Basis of Recommendation: 1, The County Assessor coordinates the scHedhasnrecommendedca Boards of Review in Hennepin County. Monday, April 29, 1991. date allows ample time for the City to conclude 2, This meeting its Board business. Alternative Recommendation: 1, The City Council could select another date for the Local Board of Review Hearing and submit the date to the County Assessor. ~~-I Discussion/Decision Mode: Hennepin County must make a schedule of local Board of Review hearings to facilitate the County Board hearings and to ensure that needed information has been compiled prior to the Local Board of Review Meetings. Notification to Hennepin County should be made as soon as possible, especially if an alternative date is requested. In any event, Hennepin County would like this information returned no later than January 11, 1991. Respect lly submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP:tm hE"v~r~p-i~~ i ~- ~. DATE: November 26, 1990 T0: Thomas P. Ferber, Richfield City Clerk ~~ ~. I ~ FROM: Gonald F. Monk, Director of Assessments ~'T4'`~ SUBJECT: 1991 Local Board of Review Date Monday April 29, 1991 w Day Gf the WeeK Gate Minnesota Law requires thct i, as Count}' Assessor, set the dare for your Local Board of Review meeting. Ar""ter reviewing previous mee}inc days and your suggestions Gf,last year, the above date was se'ected. I sincerely hope that it is acreeable with your council. As thErE must bE a quo rem, I would sugeest the.` an informal review Gf 'f G'!~61E rC ~.'" tri ~ ~ ~- fh + i ~ ~''_, 'r t?i re ^y;:e~ tha ~ ~ •E~ ticrk LhE'r Cc , eridcr5 v~~u ~ n ~:E a p~rvNrlG ~e. ~ . ~~'lEasE CGf1T1rP: the dctE Set GUS Gr Cal i TOT Mcy dt ?~~-3046 w' ~'1 VGUr alternc~-ve dcte by January 1_'_, 19G1, SC the', oUr printine Order Can bE CGT~ feed` Gn t'Tiie. WC sJGG~St si. C..rt,ny ~ ime~ GT 6.3~~, ~ •Gi. Or ~ •v~ F~. R'i•, UU 1. W~ ~ ~ QZ~I. ~:~s i t wi ~'~ VCU i f yCU wi sfi a d~ fferen ~ t1mE. str;~, ;. 'r;;ur ecr' cGTple+;Gn and return of the atLa~lCd tear ~~f= y~' .- r be aa~'reciated any wE will send year Gfficial notice for posting as required by lay. Flease return to JoDee Nelson, A-2103 Government Center, Minne~aolis, CONFIRMF,TIO Municipality: Date: Time: glace: ~C„ri rmec' by _ =_ ~c:.ir,~ me=_. _ da;.e_ n 'u~.. ~~eaY~. ~n~ _~iCwir,~; ,n=,,r:,,~_ Gn w~'.i ~~ help=ui iq CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 310 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Council confirmation of City Manager's appointment of Hearing Examiners. Background• The City Council established a hearing officer procedure in 1985 to hear and decide requests for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance where unique circumstances would cause undue hardship. The procedure was reviewed annually teamcoftanued. The "sunset" provision was deleted and a two year ppointment was established for the hearing examiners. The Ordinance provides for the appointment of at least two hearing examiners by the City Manager subject to confirmation by the City Council. The existing hearing examiners, Vern Luettinger and Connie Murray, have indicated a willingness to continue. Their experience and knowledge of the process warrant reappointment at the December 10, 1990 meeting. Recommended Motion: Confirm the City. Manager's appointment of two hearing examiners for a one and two year term to be determined by lot. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The new ordinance requires hearing examiners. the appointment of at least two 2. Vern Luettinger and Connie Murray have the experience, training and knowledge necessary for this position. Alternative Recommendation: Continue the confirmation of appointment to a future council meeting. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been scheduled for the December 10, 1990 council meeting so that the appointments may be made and a hearing examiner is available for hearings in December. Respectfully submitted, Jam Prosser Cit anager ~o City of Richfield, Minnesota Council Letter No. 311 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement• Setting date of•special City Council meeting to hold public hearing on consideration of LHN Redevelopment Project Modification #6. _BackQround: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its meeting on November 19, 1990, requested that the City Council hold a public hearing on the modification of the LHN Commercial Improvement Program. The modification would add, as acquisition, the land generally bounded byrtherSoodLinenRailroad, Pillsbury Avenue, as extended, 65th Street and 66th Street. State law requires a public hearing on the modification. Recommended Motion: Schedule December 17, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. as a Special City Council. meeting for the purpose of conducting a public hearing for consideration of LHN Redevelopment Project Modification #6, by adding thereto as property designated for acquisition, the land generally bounded by the Soo Line Railroad, Pillsbury Avenue, as extended, 65th Street and 66th Street. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The HRA has requested the City Council to hold a public hearing. on the modification. 2. State law requires a public hearing. 3. The HRA has recommended approval of the modification. 4. The Planning Commission has found the modification to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The regular HRA meeting is scheduled for December 17, 1990 and a public hearing held by the Council at that time would facilitate the review and transmittal of information received at the public hearing. Alternative Recommendation: Schedule the public hearing for another date. This would, however, delay the redevelopment process. Discussion/Decision Mode: Action at the December 10, 1990 meeting to schedule the December 17, 1990 Special City Council meeting is consistent with Charter requirements. Respectf lly submitted, Ja D. Prosser Cit Manager ~. f CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 312 Agenda December 10, 1990 Issue Statement: Consideration of Cancellation of Council Meeting Regularly Scheduled for December 24, 19.90. Background: The City Council regularly meets the second and fourth Monday evenings of each month. The fourth Monday in December, 1990 falls on Christmas Eve, which is a holiday, and the city offices will be closed. Recommended Motion: Cancel the regularly scheduled December 24, 1990 council-meeting. Basis for Recommendation: 1. December 24 is Christmas Eve. Alternative Recommendation: 1. None Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been placed on the December. l0 ,1990 city council agenda so that adequate public notice can be given. Respectfully submitted, James Prosser City Manager JDP/e j a