Loading...
02-04-91 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 10 Agenda February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Establishing a date for Council team building/goal setting workshop. Backaround• On an annual basis the City Council has conducted team building/goal setting sessions. The election of a new Mayor and the appointment of two new Council Members has occurred since the last team building/goal setting session. The purpose of these sessions is to provide a facilitated discussion of what the future priorities of the City should be and to discuss how the Council and the staff can work together as a team to accomplish the objectives. It has been customary for these sessions to be conducted on a weekday at an outside location. Copies of reports of last year's team building/goal setting session have been. provided to new Council Members. Recommended Motion: The Council should establish a date for a team building/goal setting workshop. Attached is a proposal from John Vinton to facilitate that process. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The Council has previously indicated a desire to conduct annual team building/goal setting sessions. 2. The Council has two new Members and a new elected Mayor. It is appropriate to conduct a session to identify Council priorities and establish working relationships. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council may decide to choose someone other than John Vinton to conduct the team building/goal setting exercise. 2. The Council may decide to not conduct team building/goal setting exercises. Discussion/Decision Mode: This matter was presented for discussion at-the workshop session scheduled for February 4. Respe ully submitted, J?eD. Prosser Cnager is JDP:tlm JA'J of '91 14:059 HAMLINE UNIVEPSIT)' • James Prosser City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, Minnesota 55423 Dear Jim: p °i3 January 31, 1991 It vas a pleasure to hear from you, and to learn about the latest developments in Richfield. 1\1v understanding is that you and the Council are interested in a Team Building and Goal Setting Program which assists the Council improve teamwork and which establishes priorities for the coming year. This seems to make a great deal of sense given the turnover on the council and the change of mayors. Programs of this sort can bring new members up to speed quickly. To achieve these objectives four activities are proposed: • Individual Interviews with the Council and Manager As in the past the interviews will be confidential and will be used to identify, key issues impacting the City. The interviews will provide the opportunity to re%;ew goals and commitments made at last year's session and to assess the current leve. of teamwork within the city. Based on the results of these interviews additional interviews might be recommended with department heads, as we did last year. • Council Team Building Session The agenda for the session would be based on the results of the interviews. Ex- pected topics might include progress made on issues identified last year, integra- tion of new members onto the council, the approach that the new council wants to take with respect to its work together and with staff. • Goal Setting Session The agenda for the session would be to review accomplishments for the last year, to scan the encvironment for changes or issues the City will face, to identify and set priorities for the coming year. Depending on the results of the interviews, department heads could be included in this session. • Follow-up Report A written report would be prepared summarizing the results of the two sessions. The cost of the program would be based on an hourly billing rate of not-to-ex- ceed amount established in a contract with the Government Training Service once final ar- rangements are made. My schedule would permit the interviewing to begin immediately JOHN C. N INTON, Ph.D. Management Consultant forLocal Govemment 941 Cannon Avenue ShoreNiew, Minnesota 55126 (612) 641-2203 TN a S1 '91 I::0 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY F. 3i? €1N-en some flexibility in setting appointments. Any friday in February would be possible at this time. Other times might be possible with som advance notice. As we discussed, maintaining a strong team building and planning process is important if the City is to address the important challenges it faces. I am pleased to learn that you and the Council are willing to make the commitment to this process. Please let me know if you require more information. Sincerely, • John C. Vinton, Ph.D. Consultant is CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • Study Session Letter No. 9 Agenda February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Discussion of Council designation of Mayor Pro Tempore. Back round: It is necessary to designate a Council Member to serve as the Mayor Pro Tempore for those times when the Mayor is absent from the City. Past Mayor Pro Tempores are: 1990 Edwina Garcia 1989 Martin Kirsch 1988 Michael Sandahl 1987 Ivan Ludeman 1986 Ivan Ludeman Recommended Motion: Discuss the designation of a Council Member to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for 1991. Basis for Recommendation: 1. This appointment is necessary to insure continuation of City operations during an absence of the Mayor. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Defer this appointment to a later Council meeting. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been placed on the February 14, 1991 Study Session agenda. The designation of the Mayor Pro Tempore is scheduled to occur at the February 11, 1991 regular City Council meeting. Respect ly submitted, James Prosser Cit anager JDP:ds 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 8 Agenda February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Update and discussion of plans for Wood Lake Nature Center's 20th anniversary and "Friends of Wood Lake Nature Center". Background: On Sunday, •May 5, 1991, Wood Lake Nature Center will celebrate its 20th anniversary. A planning committee has been formed to plan an anniversary celebration. Subcommittees are working on Program, Fund Raising, Publicity and Invitations. Events on Sunday, May 5, will be scheduled from about 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM. On Saturday, May 4, the same group is planning a "Kick Off" event for a Wood Lake fund raising organization. Current plans include a dinner dance with featured emcees and a keynote speaker. The goal of this organization will be to establish a source of funds to assist the nature center in continuing to provide excellent programs and services. Recommended Motion: No action required. Basis of Recommendation: 1. After several years of construction and program planning, Wood Lake Nature Center celebrated its Grand Opening in May of 1971. After 20 years of operation, the Center will be celebrating its anniversary and success. 2. A group of people, hoping to Wood Lake Nature Center, is the wider community that is broaden the funding base of seeking dedicated donations from involved with the Center. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is scheduled for the February 4, 1991 City Council study session. Respect ully submitted, Jame Prosser City wnager JDP/sdr 0 City of Richfield, Minnesota Study Session Letter No. 7 Agenda, February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Presentation and discussion of a graphic design recommended to be used for City of Richfield entrance signs and other city identification purposes. Background:' Naegele Outdoor Advertising and the Richfield Tourism and Promotion Board sponsored an entrance sign contest for the City of Richfield. The contest was initiated by the Richfield Visions 2004 Marketing Committee. The purpose of the contest was to solicit a graphic design from the public for possible use as entrance signs into the city. The city received about 100 entries for the contest. A five member judging committee selected the award-winning entries on January 8, 1991. On January 14, 1991, Mayor Martin Kirsch and representatives from Naegele Outdoor Advertising and the Richfield Tourism and Promotion Board presented the awards to the entrance sign contest winners. Under the direction of city staff, a graphic artist made refinements to the first place graphic design and prepared draft sketches of possible uses for the city. Recommended Motion: Presentation and discussion of recommended uses for the first place entrance sign contest graphic design. It is recommended that the design be utilized for entrance signs and other city identification purposes. Staff will present the possible uses for the graphic design to the Council at the Study Session on February 4, 1991. Alternative Recommendation: A variety of alternative recommendations may be discussed at the February 4, 1991 Study Session. Discussion/Decision Mode: These matters will be discussed at the February 4, 1991 Study Session. Res ectf y submitted, Jame Prosser City nager 0 JDP:kab City of Richfield, Minnesota Study Session Letter No. 6 Agenda, February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Policy and Strategy Recommendations for Airport Related Issues. Background: Recent developments regarding the airport include the following: e Interactive Community Planning at MSP The MAC has established a MSP Airport Interactive Planning Group to assist with the development of a long-term comprehensive plan at MSP. The group's responsibility is to help determine off-site impacts and potential mitigation measures for all airport capacity enhancement plans. Membership in this group will consist of elected officials from the communities adjacent to the airport, the Met Council and MAC. Mayor Martin Kirsch will represent Richfield in this group. On Wednesday, January 30, 1991, the Met Council and MAC co- sponsored a MSP Planning Workshop. The purpose of the workshop was to present the work to date of the dual-track strategy and review and comment on the 1991 work program of the long-term comprehensive plan for MSP. Mayor Martin Kirsch and city staff attended the workshop. 6 Property Acquisition in New Ford Town and Rich Acres MAC officials have stated that the commission plans to acquire the New Ford Town and Rich Acres neighborhoods. Currently, no time frame for acquisition has been developed by the MAC. The two Richfield neighborhoods are located adjacent to MSP and are increasingly subjected to pressures incompatible with residential use. These adverse impacts on residents are already severe and promise to become worse as a result of growing airport operations and expansion plans. . The City has amended the comprehensive land use plans in this area for use compatible with surrounding adverse environmental impacts. By pursuing changes in the comprehensive land use plans for these neighborhoods near MSP for future business development, Richfield has added new possibilities for the property owners and has increased the likelihood that some type of redevelopment will occur there. Residents have expressed concerns regarding continued delay and uncertainty as a result of proposed airport expansion plans. The City will develop and aggressively press a proposal that will be submitted to the MAC outlining an agreement plan to buy out New Ford Town and Rich Acres. The buy out would not be contingent on airport development options at MSP, but rather on the negative environmental impacts on the two neighborhoods. The City will ask the MAC to fund the property acquisition. The City needs to ensure, through this agreement, that it will not suffer any unreasonable adverse financial burden. A comprehensive financial plan will be included with the proposal to the MAC. The City will hire a public financial expert to develop the plan. The estimated cost to develop a comprehensive proposal would be $10,000 to $15,000. This would include the cost of a financial and airport planning consultant. e New Airport Candidate Search Area Process The Met Council has chosen three candidate search areas for a new major airport in this region. The search areas include: e Anoka-Isanti-Chisago candidate search area, approximately 102 square miles, located north of the Twin Cities primarily in Isanti county; s Dakota candidate search area, 115 square miles, located southwest of the Twin Cities in Dakota county; and • Dakota-Scott candidate search area, 113 square miles located south of the Twin Cities primarily in Dakota county. The three candidate search areas were chosen primarily because of their access to the Twin Cities area and environmental factors. Selecting a site for a new airport is part of the dual-track strategy. This strategy provides that the Met Council and the MAC examine the feasibility of building a new major airport for this region (Track B), while continuing to plan for capacity enhancements at MSP (Track A). In 1997, the Legislature is expected to decide which track to implement based on the reports and recommendations made by the Met Council and MAC. The Met Council will hold a number of public meetings on the three candidate search areas and conduct further analysis during the next 12 months. The public has begun to respond to the three candidate search areas. Attached are reactions as reported in the local newspapers. The Met Council-will designate a single search area by January 1, 1992. The MAC will select a specific site within the final search area, complete development plans and prepare an environmental assessment. The MAC must complete this analysis and submit its recommendations to the Legislature on July 1, 1996. 0 Recommended Motion: With this background information, the following recommendations are provided to address these issues: e Interactive Community Planning at MSP The City supports the development of a MSP interactive planning group and will continue to encourage MAC to work with neighboring communities on future airport planning. The proposed enhancement plans will have adverse environmental impacts on the communities surrounding the airport. Even if a decision is made by the Legislature in 1997 to build a new airport for this region, it will take at least 20 years to build. In the meantime, MSP border communities will need to alleviate the negative environmental impacts from the airport by identifying agreeable measures to mitigate these impacts. City staff will provide an update of the MSP Planning Workshop held on January 30, 1991 at the February 4, 1991 Study Session. In addition, city staff is preparing a plan to include appropriate city departments and commissions in the entire interactive planning process. e Property Acquisition in New Ford Town and Rich Acres The City will continue to press the MAC to acquire property in New Ford Town and Rich Acres through a proposal outlining an agreement plan to buy out New Ford Town and Rich Acres. City staff met with consultants from two public finance groups interested in developing the financial plan that will be included with the proposal submitted to the MAC. The two consultants are: Steven Chivington Landrum & Brown, Chicago, Illinois Edwin Pirtle Airport Consulting Services Group, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee The City has received a project proposal from Landrum & Brown (attached) and a proposal from Edwin Pirtle is forthcoming. Staff will select and hire a financial consultant by February 28, 1991. e New Airport Candidate Search Area Proces- The City will follow the new airport candidate search area process to ensure that both tracks of the dual-track strategy are equally considered and an adequate comprehensive framework is developed which will address future airport needs in this region. Richfield officials are concerned that both tracks have not been adequately studied by the Met Council and MAC. Both agencies have contributed a significant amount of resources developing Track B while Track A has not received the same priority of resources. The Richfield Airport Strategy Group (R.A.S.G.) is scheduled to meet on February 5, 1991. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss and develop a strategy for the City to effectively and actively participate in the new airport search area process. Alternative Recommendation: A variety of alternative recommendations may be discussed at the February 4, 1991 Study Session. Discussion/Decision Mode: These matters will be discussed at the February 4, 1991 Study Session. Respect lly submitted, Jame . Prosser City anager JDP:kab Attachments • 0 r LandrumE9rocun January 16, 1991 Mr. Jim Prosser City Manager City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Prosser: Landrum & Brown is pleased to submit this proposal to provide a Summary Financial Feasibility Study for the City of Richfield to utilize in its discussions with Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). Based on my discussion with you, such a Feasibility Study should evaluate options for and financial impacts of MACs acquisition of approximately 100 acres of land which is currently part of Richfield. In order to produce such a study, the following research will have to be performed: Evaluation of MACs financial structure (cost impact/source of funding); Evaluation of MACs legal structure (legal authority); Evaluation of the cost to acquire the subject property (primarily to make sure that there are no major environmental issues); and Evaluation of the desired business deal that Richfield desires (replacement of lost tax revenue, control of the property for subsequent development, etc.). Once the basic cost and legal/financial structures are understood, a set of alternatives for MACS acquisition of the subject property would be developed. Such a set of alternatives would include potential funding sources such as AT grants, Passenger Facility Charges, Airport Funds, Airport Revenue Bonds, and private investment. Under various scenarios an Airport Funding Requirement would be determined and an analysis of the impact on Airport costs would be performed. Ultimately, in order to provide an adequate argument to convince MAC to acquire the subject property, the feasibility study will have to demonstrate the following: That such an action by the Airport Operator is a prudent use of funds in the context of overall Airport needs; 4 That the resulting impact on Airport user fees, cost per enplaned passenger, and Airport discretionary funds is reasonable; Chicago • Cincinnati • Los Angeles • St. Louis 1021 W. Adams Street Chicago, Illinois 60607 312.421.0500 Fax312.421.6171 That any Airport covenants related to existing debt (typically a rate covenant) would not be violated; and If Airport Revenue Bonds are utilized as a funding source, that requirements for the issuance of additional bonds can be met. As I stated, while performing such a study may provide the catalyst that you are looking for, it would be very useful to have some discussions with Northwest Airlines to attempt to gain their support. In addition, the City of Richfield might want to consider researching potential Airport compatible users for such a site to evaluate development alternatives which might be available to Richfield. If such a potential exists, the City might be able to utilize it to its maximum advantage. This proposal addresses the feasibility study as its primary focus, but anticipates support in discussions with Northwest and potential site users. In performing this work, Landrum & Brown anticipates utilizing Mr. Bob Collette's services in coordinating its efforts and deliverables. My estimate for this type of study is $10,000 for labor plus direct expenses at cost. This estimate is for the work described in this letter and does not include amounts for support which you may desire after the report is complete. I have enclosed the resumes of Jeff Thomas, Ken Sura and myself for your further edification. Please feel free to contact any of our former clients. Thank you for the opportunity to talk to you. If you have any questions regarding this proposal please give me a call. Very truly yours, LANDRUM & BROWN Steven P. Chivington Vice President Enclosures +o*?1aM4WV -2- Undrun Braun E Jeffrey N. Thomas • C President Education Bachelor of Science- Business Administration, University of Cincinnati Studies in Architecture (four years) - University of Cincinnati Experience JeffreyThomas, an owner of the firm, has served as Chief Executive Officer of Landrum & Brown since 1976. In his more than 20 years with the firm, he has provided objective counsel to clients on matters including manage- ment improvement and cost reduction, facility design programming, development program feasibility and fi- nancing, airfield/airspace operational improvement, market development, and environmental impact assess- ment/abatement. Mr. Thomas is a recognized expert in airspace operations management. He was a member of the Industry Task Force on Airport Capacity Improvement and Delay Reduction, formed to provide guidance to the FAA Administrator on the most cost effective means to im- prove airport capacity. As the primary technical advisor to the O'Hare Delay Task Force, he led the development of an operating procedures program which resulted in a significant increase in airport capacity and millions of dollars of annual savings in delay-associated aircraft operating costs. Mr. Thomas was responsible for devel- opmcnt of a transportation system software package comprising the AIRSIM (airspace/airfield) and GATESIM (apron/gate) simulation models used by the O'Hare Task Force in achieving its remarkable results. Mr. Thomas has provided consulting expertise in the master planning, programming, conceptual develop- ment, and operation of both domestic and international terminal buildings and support facilities. One recent project is the 5840-million redevelopment and renova- tion of O'Hare International's passenger handling facili- tics. In this major program, Mr. Thomas represented the City of Chicago in use agreement negotiations, including configuration of the cost/revenue center structure, rates and charges mechanisms, capital program cost alloca- tion, terminal space and apron frontage allocation, and budgetary/operating procedures. Environmental impact assessments completed under Mr. Thomas' direction have resulted in federal funding approval of numerous projects, including new runways, runway extensions, terminal buildings, and land acquisi- tions. He is experienced in the integration of traditional master planning techniques with quantifiable measures of community economic and environmental impact, and in the application of the most sophisticated methods to resolve airport /community noise problems. Landrum eBrotun • Education Bachelor of Science - Purdue University Registered Professional Engineer - Illinois, Indiana Experience From 1988 to We 1990 Mr. Chivington was the Executive Vice President of Aviation Resource Partners (A•R'P) responsible for finance and management. In this role Mr. Chivington represented the Chicago International Carriers Association (CICA) which consists of approximately 20 foreign flag and domestic carriers in their financial negotiations with the City of Chicago for the 5470 million International Terminal Development at O'Hare. In additional to this project, Mr. Chivington was involved with financial feasibility studies for a cargo facility for Japan Airlines and the City of New Orleans. is Prior to forming A'R•P, Mr. Chivington served as the Controller for United Airline's $560 million Terminal One Project at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago since September, 1986. Reporting to the Project Director and the Senior Vice President of Corporate Services for United, his was responsible for the affirmative action program and all construction related financial matters, including financial analysis, reporting projections, contract negotiations, contract administration and municipal finance. Additionally, he assumed responsibility for the new state of the art baggage handling system in the terminal during the start-up phase. Prior to contracting to United Airlines, Mr. Chivington was Assistant Vice President for Corporate Administration for Envirodyne Engineers, Inc. in Chicago. During his eight-year tenure with Envirodyne, he was assigned to O'Hare Associates, a joint venture of Murphy/Jahn, Schal Associates and Steven P. Chivington Vice President Envirodyne Engineers which he participated in forming as one of its Directors. As the Director of Program Control for O'Hare Associates, Mr Chivington was a member of a five-person management team which oversaw the $2 billion O'Hare Development Program. In this position, Mr. Chivington was directly responsible for the Finance, Cost Control and Scheduling, Computer Operations and Administration Departments. Prior to the creation of O'Hare Associates, Mr. Chivington was a member of Envirodyne's corporate staff, reporting to the Senior Vice President of Finance. His responsibilities included business performance evaluation, profit projections, computer applications and control. In addition, Mr. Chivington supported the marketing department in the preparation and presentation of proposals for projects requiring a project control function. Originally, Mr. Chivington joined Envirodyne as the manager of cost control and scheduling for a new construction management division. During the first year of the operation of this new division, the three-person management group grew to a staff of forty, with projects valued at over $100 million. Before joining Envirodyne Engineers in 1978, Mr. Chivington was employed as Assistant Manager of Cost Control for Davy/McKee, Inc. in Chicago, Scheduling Supervisor for The Austin Company in Des Plaines, Illinois -and Foreman/inspector for Jeffco Steel Fabricators, a division of Research Cottrell, in Denver, Colorado. • Landrum eBrouin • Education Master of Business Administration, Arizona State University Bachelor of Science, Finance - Arizona State University Since joining Landrum & Brown in 1987, Mr. Sura's responsibilities have included the semi-annual preparation and review of Chicago-O'Hare International and Midway Airports' Airlines Rates and Charges and the development of related micro- computer financial models used in the process. He is also responsible for the review of O'Hare Airport's operational budget, which exceeds three hundred million dollars annually. He plaved an integral role in preparing the economic and financial feasibility study for Chicago-O'Hare International Airport's New International Terminal in support of $489,735,000 in Special Revenue Bonds, and the financial feasibility study for the $244,035,000 1990 A and B series General Airport Revenue Bonds. Mr. Sura also developed an automated ledger system for use in micro computer applications which is capable of producing a variety of financial reports. Other responsibilities include analysis of facilities lease Kenneth P. Sura Director agreements, review of concession programs, and evaluating alternative methods of financial airport development programs and the forecasting of revenues and expenses for quarterly cash flow reports. Prior to joining Landrum & Brown, Mr. Sura worked for Recon Optical Inc. as both a senior financial analyst and a cost/price analyst.. He was responsible for monthly operations and performance reports, annual operating budgets, cash flow analysis, and forecasting capital requirements. Some of Mr. Sura's other responsibilities included the development of project proposals, contract negotiations, and financial modeling. 0 REACTIONS TO THE NEW AIRPORT CANDIDATE SEARCH AREAS FOUND IN LOCAL NEWSPAPERS ANOKA-ISANTI-CHISAGO. NORTHERN SITE: -- "I am strongly opposed to a new international airport north of the Twin Cities," said Allan Jarehow of Harris, who farms the land his grandfather purchased when he came from Sweden in 1882. He hopes to have his heirs operate the farm in the future but the new airport would make it difficult for him to continue farming in the area. Val Anderson, a Stanchfield Township officer, told the Metropolitan Systems Committee on January 8 that a new airport would bring sweeping changes to the area. These changes would include urban sprawl, loss of wildlife areas and wildlife, more pollution, higher taxes, bigger highways and a loss of farmland. "The airport and the metropolitan area are one in the same and you cannot have one without the other . . . since the airport now is in the metropolitan area and the three search sites are not, anywhere you place the airport but at its existing site will be putting a sentence of death on rural Minnesota and the environment in that area." Neil Miller of Linwood Township, who lives a mile south of the Anoka-Isanti-Chisago search area said he used to live in south Mpls. and is familiar with the problems of airport noise. He told council members at the January 8 public hearing that they are entering a war trying to site an airport in a rural area. "in order to site this airport . . . it will require conquering the people who live on that land now. Ron McGriff of rural Braham said a new airport located either north or south of the metropolitan area would promote urban sprawl and urged the Met Council to study the issue (January 8 public hearing). "Most planners and officials throughout the county have found urban sprawl in the long run to be very costly in economic, social and environmental terms. Can we not in Minnesota find a way to have a balanced economy throughout this state or will we all have to live in the greater metro area? For those who promise us great economic gain from such projects, we need to ask them if such gains justify the loss of small towns and rural living." (Blaine-Spring Lake Park Life, Anoka County, January 11, 1991) -- Rep. Harold Lasley, DFL-Cambridge. "I would like to say our area is more of a long shot. It's not as close (to the Twin Cities), it seems to have more environmental questions and its not within the seven-county metropolitan area . . . If everybody up here wanted it and my job was on the line to deliver it, I'd probably be reading the want ads right now." Senator Janet Johnson, DFL-North Branch, lives three miles east of the search area. She's anxious to know how people feel about the idea. "I know the business people are very supportive of it and those that are concerned about the economic development are supportive, but then we have the citizens in the district who moved up there to get away from it all . . They have a lot to lose and I know it's a very emotional issue for them." (Isanti News, December 20, 1990) -- Senator Janet Johnson, DFL-North Branch made comments in another northern community newspaper. "It's very important that the [new airport] task force hold public hearings throughout the area to get input on this from residents. I've talked to a few people about this issue and have heard both support and opposition to the idea. I intend to listen carefully to what the people have to say on this issue, and I hope everyone will study it very carefully." (Pine City Pioneer, December 20, 1990) Letter to the editor from a resident in favor of a new airport built north of the Twin Cities. Attached is a copy of the letter. (Star Tribune, December 31, 1990) -- Letter to the Isanti News editor on January 3, 1991 from an Isanti resident addressing the negative effects of an airport in the area. Attached is a copy of the letter. -- An editorial comment by Elmer L. Anderson in the Princeton Union Eagle (Mille Lacs County) on December 20, 1990 addressing the positive and negatives impacts of a new airport in the northern candidate search area. Attached is a copy of the editorial. DAKOTA-SCOTT, SOUTHERN SITES: -- Ted Hammond, a nature photographer from Rosemount presented emotional testimony at the January 8 Metropolitan Council public hearing. He stated, "I see the small voice of the farmer get up here and say, 'we've been here for 100 years.' I think that we should respect that." John Sass of St. Paul told the committee he and his wife recently bought five acres of land in Linwood Township. "We are moving to this area to get away from the metropolitan area to have a better place to bring up our family." (Blaine-Spring Lake Park Life, Anoka County, January 11, 1991) -- Leon Orr, council member in Farmington, stated at a city council meeting on January 7, 1991, "I really think they (MAC) could speed up the process of making a decision of the search area and the site within." His rationale for that statement was that potential and current landowners have their hands tied when decisions such as moving arise. It also affects city and county governments that are required by law to have comprehensive plans (long-range planning). "Nobody knows what to do." Larry Thompson, Farmington city administrator. "Basically what they do is-put a moratorium on property (Met Council). Let's get the plug in early on to accelerate the decision-making process." He added that the MAC needs to realize the impact their decisions are having on "vast areas of land." Although many in Dakota County might like to see the MAC decide on the northern search area located in Isanti County for a new airport, that would be "disastrous" for Dakota County. "There are tradeoffs, including the fact that a large portion of people living in Dakota County are employed directly or indirectly by the current MSP airport." These statements were made at the Farmington City Council meeting on January 7, 1991. Norm Derington, Farmington city council member, made a few comments at the January 7, 1991 city council meeting. Derington criticized the Met Council for believing that poor turnout at public meetings means acceptance of its plan. "If this process is like any other Metropolitan Council process . non- attendance means acceptance." (Farmington Independent, Dakota County, January 10, 1991) -- Chris Galler, Farmington city council member. "I have an 80 percent feeling it (the site) will be on one side of Farmington or the other. If indeed the point comes where it was going to be built, yeah, it would effect Farmington. Whether it would be good or bad? I don't know." He also said that although the final decision on whether the airport will be built is still years in the future, now is the time for area residents to get involved. "It is important to start thinking about this. Up until today, I don't think anyone thought it was real." He is having a hard time comprehending the size of the candidate search area -- "it's difficult to fathom the size of the area they are looking at. That's a huge area." With a new airport, there will be economic growth -- industry likes to locate near the airport which will bring more jobs. Along with the growth, however, problems could arise such as noise. "There are, of course, environmental concerns. Not only pollution, but noise. Area residents have come to him worried about potential noise from the flights." Galler also has concerns about the effect of the search process on development and property sales. "If they 0 do pick one area, they could limit future development. That would be a very difficult situation. Some of them may be elderly and may want to sell off." Larry Thompson, Farmington city administrator. "I guess I didn't realize the large size of the area" adding that the city still has to look into the implications of the search area recommendations. John Forrest, program manager with the Dakota County Department of Planning and Program Management. Communities located in the search areas would have to have certain zoning requests reviewed and approved by the Met Council. "What we're talking about here is the Metropolitan Council having veto authority over zoning amendments, conditional-use permits and zoning variances within the airport search areas. Based on the nature of the local zoning request, the Met Council may decide to act fairly quickly. If that zoning request has the potential of having a major impact on a future airport, then the Met Council will look more closely at the proposal before deciding." (Farmington Independent, Dakota County, December 20, 1990) The Dakota County Board stated at the Met Council public hearing on January 8 that it would like the airport to stay where it is. Board members said they are concerned about the economic disruption that would occur in the county's northern cities such as Eagan, where there are many companies that do business related to MSP. The board is also concerned about controls the Met Council wants to put on the 200 square miles of Dakota County land that comprise two possible sites for an airport. Joe Harris, board member of Hastings said, "It is ludicrous to tie up all the property" of one of the three areas for three years. Commissioner Michael Turner said that some cities such as Burnsville and Lakeville are adopting a wait-and-see attitude on whether the airport should be moved to Dakota County. "There is a delicate balance" in those areas between the people who want the economic boom that would follow and the people who farm in the rural areas of the county or who moved there to get away from the suburbs, core cities and the airport itself. The County Board wants the Legislature to pay for the studies that cities and townships want to do on the economic impact as well as the planning and development impact an airport would have on their communities. (Star Tribune, January 9, 1991) -- Letter to the editor from an Apple Valley resident opposing an airport in Dakota County. It appeared in the Rosemount This- Week, Dakota County, December 30, 1990. The letter is attached. -- Dwain Otte, who farms three miles west of Randolph and is a member of the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation Board, feels it is a little early for concern. "I figure there will be a lot of negotiating before they choose a site. Logic tells me, however, that if it's going to be, it's going to be south. That's where the bulk of the traffic comes from." Otte isn't worrying about the possible effects to his property, but said that proposed land-use controls could have an effect on individual farmers who are considering new livestock buildings, for example. The Soil and Water Conservation Board is likely to be looking at the issue from an environmental point of view sometime soon. Lori Nicholai, a student at Winona State University and works at her father's repair shop in Hampton, thought the idea of having the airport nearby was exciting. She felt moving the airport south would benefit students at colleges in the southeastern part of the state who must fly home. She did acknowledge that noise would definitely be a problem for those who lived near the airport. Ray Nicholai, Hampton resident. The airport has to go somewhere and not matter where it goes, there will be opposition. Dick Mensing, president of the Cannon Falls Area Chamber of Commerce, said the selection of either of the two southern sites would be a boon to housing and retail business in Cannon Falls. On the other hand, selection of a site north of the Twin Cities could cause the Rochester Airport to become more important to local residents. (Cannon Falls-Beacon, Goodhue County, December 20, 1990) -- Letter to the editor from a Vermillion resident stating negative aspects of an airport at a site south of the Twin Cities. It appeared in the Cannon Falls-Beacon, Goodhue County on January 10, 1991. Attached is a copy of the letter. -- The Lakeville City Council has expressed concern about the degree to which the city's long range planning efforts will be affected by the possibility of a new metropolitan airport siting in Dakota County. The city council is concerned about the degree to which local comprehensive plans might have to be modified if the nearby area became a major regional airport site and what such a designation would have on current residents and businesses. Bob Erickson, city administrator in Lakeville, released a statement indicating that planning for a solution to the potential airport dilemma conflicts with long range planning efforts of Dakota County and affected municipalities and townships. Lakeville's planning process did not include the possibility of locating a major regional airport in southern Dakota County, he added. Lakeville city officials plan to work with officials from Dakota County, area municipalities and townships to schedule public meetings for citizen input. Discussion is expected to relate to the environmental, economic and financial impacts of the possible new airport. (Lakeville-Life & Times, December 31, 1990) -- Lyle Wray, Dakota County administrator. "This will have a big impact on Dakota County, the major issues will be economic and the environment. We're going to have to do some homework and look at it very closely. It's a mixture of negatives and positives, it's very complex, and the weighing will have to be done by the board." Steve Loeding, Dakota County commissioner. He does not like the process the Metropolitan Council is using or the possibility of a new airport in Dakota County. "A lot of people are moving out here to get away from the airport. I'm not sure they understand that this will have a short-term negative impact on real estate in the county." He believes it would be more economical for the airport to start acquiring property in Bloomington and Richfield to expand the present airport than to build a new one. "It's in the best interests of this county to push for improvements at the present location." (West St. Paul Sun, Dakota County, December 19, 1990. -- Dave Osberg, Hastings city administrator. "Don't build it too close to us, but not too far away either." The possible noise, the thickening of people and traffic that a new airport would bring are thee obvious detriments. The increases in business volume, and chances for employment are the obvious benefits that could spin off from an airport. Paul Czech, Hastings city planner. "There's a tradeoff, no question about it." Some of the possible jobs an airport could bring with it are "high tech" jobs. How much noise an airport would bring depends on where the airstrips are built. Mike Werner, Hastings Mayor. He stresses that the city will monitor the site selection process, and be active in making its wishes known. Dick Mathiowetz, Hastings council member. He said that no amount of benefits would be worth the decrease in the area's quality of life that an airport would bring. (Hastings Star Gazette, Dakota County, December 20, 1990) -- Vermillion-area farmers feel that putting an airport in the middle of Dakota County would be a terrible waste of good, productive farm land. Paul Breskau, Vermillion farmer. "If some of my land is selected, I would prefer that all of it be selected or none at all. I don't want to be farming next to an airport. I would miss the land, too.. I guess. I was born and raised here and I would hate to see it go." Earl Wagner, Vermillion farmer. He is opposed to any plan to convert his land into an airport. He said just being included in the search area is "not a pleasant feeling." He continued, "you can't really fight it. Maybe you could try at first, but if they have their minds made up, then it's over. It's a shame. They would be swallowing up two towns in a rural are,a that is rich with heritage." He would rather see the airport stay where it is. "I don't want anyone taking my land away from me. Land that I've worked hard for, land that my ancestors worked hard for. I don't want anyone buying my land unless I want to sell it. I think most every farmer out here will tell you that. Farmers don't like to be told what to do -- that's why they're farmers, they are their own boss and they like it that way." Maureen Werner, Vermillion. She said that between a possible international airport and a proposed incinerator looming in Dakota County, good farm land is being squeezed. "It's a shame, that between 20 and 30 miles of good farm land is just going to disappear. That's the basic comment heard around here. Everybody got talking about it last week when Channel 4 (WCCO-TV) came down here and stirred everybody up." Leo Bauer, Vermillion farmer. He is concerned about his children. "I wouldn't like to see it. Not so much for me, but for the boys. I'm sure they would like to continue farming it. But that's progress. If progress is going to happen there's not much you can do about it." He is also concerned about the continued urban sprawl from the Twin Cities on to areas with good farmland like Dakota County. "They keep taking more and more land. Sometimes you just wonder when it's ever going to stop." (Hastings Star Gazette, Dakota County, December 20, 1990) -- Joe Harris, Dakota County commissioner who represents the rural southern portion of the county. "My feeling is they should get the financial and economic feasibility studies done first, before they go out and tie up 30,000 to 40,000 acres of land." Steve Loeding, Dakota County commissioner who represents Rosemount, Inver Grove Heights and part of Apple Valley. "I'd say the state Legislature has the cart before the horse to go out and start picking big stretches of land. There's going to be an adverse impact before they even determine if it's even feasible to build an airport, or if it's even needed. The only reason (the east central site) is in there is to appease some people. There's no way they're going to build an airport in Empire and Vermillion and Rosemount. There's just too much development. Some people in St. Paul have been pushing for the U of M site for an airport, and that's why it's in there." Loeding doubts an airport will be built and called for gradual acquisition of property around the existing airport to allow for expansion. Even if a new airport is built, that's 20 to 30 years away, he predicted. The county board has supported the dual-track approach of searching for a new site while considering expansion, but also plans to seek legislation requiring that feasibility studies on the search areas be done before a final site is chosen. Jon Hohenstein, assistant city administrator in Eagan. "In terms of the sites that have been chosen, it is pretty obvious that if a new airport is to be built, the region would be better served by a southern location." Linda Barton, former City Manager in Burnsville. "We are pleased there are a couple sites in Dakota County." She stated that the airport siting is a "tradoff issue." "There's been a lot of industry and development that has been based on having that airport nearby." Meanwhile, airlines are making progress toward using quieter planes, she said. Mike Turner, Dakota County commissioner who represents most of Burnsville and part of Lakeville. "The cities I represent are aware of the potential economic impacts of the movement of the airport, and they're taking a wait-and-see attitude. Obviously, if it moves up north, it will be a negative. If it moves to within Dakota County, it could be a positive or a negative." Tom Melena, city administrator in Apple Valley. Apple Valley may hold a public forum this winter before taking a position. It is too early to determine how or if an airport would affect the city. "Several city officials . . . have a strong dislike for the site south of Rosemount." He also added that take-off and landing patterns would put planes directly over the city. Larry Thompson, city administrator in Farmington. He recommends that officials of Lakeville, Rosemount, Eureka, Empire and Castle Rock discuss the matter at a joint meeting." Eugene Kuchera, Farmington Mayor. It's important that the smaller cities unite to make their voices heard. "Read my lips . . . we've got to work together." (This Week Burnsville, December 23, 1990) -- Burnsville city officials say they are carefully weighing the pros and cons of the two airport sites located in Dakota County. Dan McElroy, Burnsville Mayor. "Let's not rush to judgment; let's be patient. It's important that we be objective and consider all the information available to us." He said the city council had not yet discussed the matter and planned to listen carefully to all available information. "This is a six to eight year study. The airport will be built in the next century and will hopefully, last a century or more. There is no need to rush." Linda Barton, former City Manager in Burnsville. She echoed the comments made by Mayor Dan McElroy. She added the potential economic growth, should Dakota County get the nod for the new airport. "And of course, we must consider issues of noise. While we're pleased at a possible economic disadvantage, we have to consider every angle. And we will certainly be looking into public input." (Burnsville Sun Current, December 19, 1990) -- Joe Harris, Dakota County commissioner. He has been vocal in letting the Met Council officials and legislators know that he thinks the airport process is backwards. "If you don't speak-up, no one is going to hear you. They're doing it all wrong. They've got the cart before the horse." Air service needs should be determined before possible sites are, he said. As a result of the process, Dakota County residents might be forced to consider questions such as: "Do I put up this $100,000 barn? Do I build a new house?" He is afraid of what the list might do to property sales. Harris presented a scenario of an elderly couple that 0 must sell their house. His theory is that there are few people who would be willing to pay market value or even consider buying a house that might one day be replaced by an airport tarmac. He is convinced the possible site selection is sure to stunt growth by reducing property values. "It's just going to cause a lot of people grief," he said. (Northfield News, Rice County, December 14, 1990) Very few local residents.and government officials are excited about the announcement that the Met Council is considering land immediately north of Northfield for a new airport. Many say the quality of life in this farm community would suffer if an airport is built. Others also don't like the idea of designating land for an airport, and possibly reducing the value of land as a result. John Dudley, a grain farmer in Waterford Township. "The people in Waterford are really opposed to it. We want to remain a farming community. I want to keep my land as farmland." He said the sentiment of his neighbors is the same. He was a member of a neighborhood group that fought against an earlier attempt to at least consider the Castle Rock site for a new airport. Their work was done after it was determined that no new airport was needed. 0 The Northfield city council does not have an official position on the subject. Marv Grundhoefer, Northfield Mayor. "I personally would not like to see it in the Castle Rock area. It's now more important than ever to work with Dakota County townships and monitor the progress of the airport search process. It's important to keep watch over both the Castle Rock and Vermillion search areas. "It could be beneficial, but it also could be harmful. The one that makes the most sense is the one closer to Highway 52" (referring to the Vermillion site). He said that the site's proximity to both the Twin Cities and Rochester make it a better site. "It's important to maintain the integrity of Northfield, with the two colleges and the environment we have here. I am confident we can maintain that. I'm not worried." Kathy Feldbrugge, Northfield Chamber of Commerce official. The chamber does not have an official opinion on the matter at this point. "I think people were kind of surprised at the announcement." She agreed that the airport will be an issue given Northfield's historical preservation efforts. She said the designation is sure to be discussed in the future. Molly Woehrlin, chairperson of the Rice County Board of Commissioners. She said the quality of life in the county, as well as southern Dakota County, would be reduced so drastically that it would outweigh any economic benefit the airport the airport brings in terms of jobs and airport-related industry. "I think very few people would benefit economically. I am hearing that people want to preserve this as an agricultural county." She said opposition to the Willingers Golf Course in Webster Township was an indication of that opposition. Donovan Pautzke, a Malt-O-Meal executive. "I have mixed feelings." He said that someday, he'll retire, and the idea of air traffic over his retirement home isn't appealing. The "flip side" of that is the potential economic impact on the community. The prospect of the Isanti-Anoka-Chisago site north of the Twin Cities isn't all that appealing for a business like Malt-O-Meal. "We'd hate to have to drive to Anoka or beyond to get to the airport." Dave Dacquisto, Rice County planning and zoning director. He figures any hotel development associated with a new airport would occur between the airport and the Twin Cities. Airport-related industry, however, might locate elsewhere -- possibly to the south where labor costs generally are lower. That could mean jobs for Northfielders. Harry Scofield, SCO Enterprises in Northfield (an international consulting firm). He flies between 70,000 and 120,000 miles per year. He said he sees the need for a new airport, but he too, seems to have mixed feelings about search area designation. "I can see both sides of it. A new international airport would make Northfield grow like crazy. It's just a matter of whether that is something Northfield wants." He added that air travel used to be a pleasure, but that since deregulation, flight cancellations and consolidations have made it "no longer fun to travel." He questioned the appointment of Met Council officials who are making preliminary decisions. "The Met Council has got control like you wouldn't believe -- that's scary." Pat Sculley, southern Dakota County representative on the Met Council. He said that the need fora new international airport has not been demonstrated. While more people are going through the airport, they are being transported by fewer planes. "Need hasn't been demonstrated in the first place . . . what are they going to do with the existing one?" Joe Harris, Dakota County commissioner. He doesn't think that a new airport will be built. Businesses on the I-494 strip near the airport will lobby strongly to keep the airport at its present location. "They might as well have taken the whole county. They've taken my whole district." Warren Sifferath, Dakota County extension director. He wants people to think rationally about the issue. "Most planners agree you cannot plan for 20 years down the road. This country is designed around citizen input. I think people need to relax and let the process take its course." (Northfield News, December 19, 1990) 0 -- Lyle Wray, Dakota County administrator. "This will have a big impact on Dakota County, the major issues will be economic and the environment. We're going to have to do some homework and look at it very closely. It's a mixture of negatives and positives, it's very complex, and the weighing will have to be done by the board." Steve Loeding, Dakota County commissioner. He does not like the process the Metropolitan Council is using or the possibility of a new airport in Dakota County. "A lot of people moved out here to get away from the airport. I'm not sure they understand that this will have a short-term negative impact on real estate in the county." He believes it would be more economical for the airport to start acquiring property in Bloominton and Richfield to expand the present airport than to build a new one. "It's in the best interests of this county to push for improvements at the present location." (Eagan Chronicle, December 19, 1990) -- Tom Egan, Eagan Mayor. "If it goes north it's going to have devasting consequences." Rather than support one airport expansion option, the city could consider identifying the least intrusive option (at MSP). Either of the three options will affect Eagan unlike other cities neighboring the airport. He has stated the city should determine the economic impacts if the airport moved south. At the same time, the city should ask how airport expansion might affect property values. Dave Gustafson, Eagan council member. He feels that moving the airport south would preserve Eagan's business interests as well as those along Interstate 494 in Bloomington. However, many assumptions accompany this thought. Should Eagan side in favor of relocation, the city must back its support with reasons. Eagan's support should depend on such factors as how far away the airport would locate and the type of mass transportation provided. Tim Pawlenty, Eagan council member. The city needs a second option that addresses airport expansion in case airport relocation is considered economically or politically not feasible. Eagan should consider becoming active in lobbying for its own seat on MAC or at least one seat representing northern Dakota County. Jon Hohenstein, assistant city administrator in Eagan. Richfield and Bloomington support the northern runway, but would accept the north-south runway to keep the airport; Minneapolis groups do not support expansion; St. Paul would likely support any expansion option; Mendota Heights favors the southern parallel runway; Burnsville favors the parallel runways, but not the north-south runway. Concepts A and B would increase airplane noise over areas in Eagan already affected by airplanes such as Highview County Home Heights. Concept C would create new noise over the relatively quiet Cedar-Grove area along Cedar Avenue. He believes the question needs to be asked: Is less intrusive airplane noise more palatable in areas currently least affected; or is more intrusive noise preferred in areas already affected by airplanes? (Eagan Chronicle, December 19, 1990) GENERAL COMMENTS: -- Officials at Eagan-based Northwest Airlines are reserving comment on which of the three sites selected as possible locations,for a new Twin Cities airport they prefer. Christy Clapp, Northwest Airlines spokesperson: "We have no preference among the three sites that were selected. Our position is that we support the dual-track approach." "Right now, the current airport supports our needs. But we do not know what our needs will be in the future, so we recognize the importance of long-term planning and support the process." (This Week Apple Valley, December 23, 1990) -- Sherwin Friedman, general manager of the Holiday Inn International and president of the Bloomington Hospitality Association. He said the airport is "the most important item that we have going for us." Moving the airport would mean more inconvenience for visitors and business travelers to the Twin Cities. It takes about 12 to 15 minutes to get to the airport from either downtown. Taking that trip to the new areas in the year 2010 would be "like going to (Chicago's) O'Hare Field during rush hour." Larry Lee, director of community development in Bloomington. The areas "sure look a long ways away. For most of the central metro area, it means an hour of travel for people to get to the airport." Members of the St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce. They are "encouraged that two out of the three (areas) are in the metro east area," said spokesperson Margaret Wethington. However, the organization has not taken a position on the issue of moving the airport, she said. Steve Loeding, Dakota County commissioner (represents Rosemount). A poll of Rosemount residents taken in 1988 found that they opposed an airport near their city by 4 to 1. "Anyone who knows Dakota County knows the areas they picked are kind of stupid" because they are adjacent to developing areas such as Lakeville, Farmington and Apple Valley. To build in this area would replicate noise complaints the airport now receives from south Minneapolis and adjacent suburbs. It also would displace agriculture and the people who moved to the area to get away from the airport. The southern Dakota area would not be as objectionable as the northern one, but the combination of rough terrain and wetlands there might make it a bad place to build. He acknowledged that there would be an economic boom in the county if the airport were to be relocated there. But he said, "We've had a tremendous economic boom because of where the airport is now. Why go to the public expense of moving it?" Bill Morris, president of Decision Resources Ltd. (He conducted the survey in Rosemount.) "It's a clash of what I call futures. Rosemount in may ways sees itself as a small town in the suburban belt and wants to keep it that way. The airport coming in would have a major impact on the future of that community." Tom Hedges, city administrator in Eagan. The economic impact is a prime consideration of the Dakota County site for him not only of Northwest Airlines headquarters but of many other businesses ancillary to the airport and airlines. Many people who work at the airport live in Eagan. He expressed opposition to the Isanti County area -- "If you uproot a whole economy that has been building up for years and years, it would cost more than just the cost of the airport." Thomas Melena, city administrator in Apple Valley. He stated that he hasn't taken a position on the siting issue. Eugene Rotty, chairman of the Vermillion Town Board in Dakota County. He said a farmer getting ready to retire might be happy to get a good price for his farm if it became part of an airport but others might not like the idea at all. But he said he's not too concerned about the issue. "I suppose it will take them 20 years to decide." Mike Robertson, city administrator in Isanti. He has read and heard about new airport plans and stated that one of the southern areas will get the nod. "Most of the money is on that side of town and it's easier for them to drive there." Judy Uban, president of SMAAC. "I think an hour (trip to the airport) is not unrealistic. Everyone kind of gasps, but in most other cities, we drive at least 45 minutes to an hour to get to the airport. (Star Tribune, December 15, 1990) -- Roger Holmes, fish and wildlife director in the state Department of Natural Resources. His reaction to the northern area site. "I don't think that's a proper location for an airport . . . birds and airplanes don't mix. There are tens of thousands of migrating birds there, ducks, geese, gulls, herons, bald eagles. I even saw a peregrine falcon there the other day. And it's not just birds. There are large herds of deer at Carlos Avery that could get on the runway." (St. Paul Pioneer Press, December 15, 1990) -- Reactions from individuals at the January 8, 1991 Metropolitan Council public hearing. Most of the 21 people speaking at the public hearing agreed that expanding MSP would be preferable to building a new one near them. They contended a new airport would destroy agriculture, wildlife habitat, and a lifestyle for which many people fled the metro area. Some also suggested it would promote urban sprawl. Henry Iwerks, Farmington resident. "I encourage you to speed things up. Our property values are at stake. The longer it drags on, the more problems we will have." (St. Paul Pioneer Press, January 9, 1991) -- Joe Harris, Dakota County tie up all that land for one feasibility studies. Those become the next Eagan in the going anywhere. For them to 0 property is ridiculous. All townships and the small citii Commissioner. "It's ludicrous to to six years before doing any townships aren't threatening to next six years. The land isn't sya they have to secure this that's going to happen is the 2?s will lose their planning ability." Steve Loeding, Dakota County Commissioner. He suggested that the county establish a citizen task force to become involved in the process and that the county should seek out opportunities for representation on the Met Council task force involved. "That might be a good investment." County staff is looking into the idea of a local task force. (Dakota County Tribune Burnsville, January 17, 1991) 0 0 • ,Mf CLIPPING SERVICE ISANTI NEWS lund Co. J AN ;? 1991 _ ? - Let the choice be Dear \-) Editor. that. To imagine some day in ..Choosy People Choose the not-too-distant future that isanti" reads the bumper the whispering of summer sticker that was left behind for breezes and the calling of me by the previous owners of loons and other wildlife could the home I bought near Isanti. overpowered every three For me, "choosy" is an under. ,minutes by the throaty roar of statement. After more than two jet planes on approach is mind- months of house hunting plowing. across seven counties follow- wt would be good for, the ing moving here from Illinois, 1 ., >aconomy " So. would casinos. was satisfied that I had found a - So would unrestricted pomo- very special area to live and call graphy. And yes, it would cer. home. tainly put Jsanti on the map, 1 don't regret my choice: the but do we really want 100 non. peaceful open spaces, the nat- stop flights daily from every- :•+?• :,}?•.,,,: :::::,: I - UW gerentty, the harmonies'Ut where to our doorstep? netwe coexisting side by side It would be a boost to the ! with civilization, is all around. .prea." Sure, but hold on to your A dear friend of mine, who is 4,1:.,,6ats. Put millions of passenger -- - = - - :? = j also the woman 1 intend to miles a glut of supporting ser - marry,' upon -seeing 'the lakes . ?? industry surrounding the area of tsanti was so moved as f site, and hundreds of jet flights to write an endearing song- : through any small town in III poem in tribute. America and, presto, you've That this beautiful region .;got instant exponential cash has been declared a restricted :flow. But at what price? zone for a possible tutureit z Our small" town disap- n tlortstl ai ort suddenly and pears Others disappear com -drama i y _ Changes all of , pletely, along with thousands ours of homes,and households. It always amazes me how putting a dollar sign in front of a num. ber can change the power of a sales pitch. We've all seen the end result. Drive around any major airport for many miles in any direction and then try to jell your neighbors that this is what you would like for your- self, and for your children. If we have a choice in this, and I hope to God we do, I think Isanti (and Chisago and Anoka) Should Choose to grow as Isan- °ti chooses to grow, and not just because the dollar sign has commuted up 1-35 from the Twin Cities in search of more runways. .. Let the businesses go to the airports if they want. Let Isanti *be the way It wants to be. "Choosy People Choose -Isanti. " The choice should be ours. Steve Olson 4koute 1 Isanti I !:....r........... rrnir r ni r t ..? !I ! n r i .r•.? rV ? . •l'.'t } IV:.. .... ? ?' 1 } ' Irll IC 1 1 tlllll tM t !i '? }E tI ?F! I1 `illll 1T •i31. I u II it Ijj !r Ir :.:?.,,:i:,;;hli ;I' Ef i}rir ,?+iar. ?r'? F h:,.' ? tikfl ? ill ??: Ilr? tl iltlri•11 fi tlffl f. ttk t4?1!f. I'1 .I}i?j I ,i,?l ?I:. i rt1tEliiiiiifiilflliEli?i!I 11 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 5 Agenda February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Review of the City of Richfield 1991 legislative initiatives and policy package. Background: The attached City of Richfield legislative initiatives and policies are based upon Council policy and direction as previously established. Policies will be presented to the Council and to our legislative representatives at the work session of February 4. The legislative initiatives which have been prepared are a condensed version of some problems facing the city with some proposed solutions. The legislative initiatives have been previously provided to the legislature so that they may review these issues prior to the work session on February 4. Recommended Motion: The legislative initiatives and policies will be presented for discussion purposes with Council Members and legislators. No formal action is required at this meeting. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Prior discussions with Council on legislative issues. 2. Recommendations by League of Minnesota Cities and Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. 3. Staff recommendations. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council may choose to revise, delete or add policy at their pleasure. Discussion/Decision Mode: This matter will be presented to the Council at the study session of February 4. Res lly submitted, Jam s Prosser Cit anager JDP:tlm • CITY OF RICHFIELD LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES & POLICIES (IS PROVIDED AS AN ATTACHMENT) • • CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 4 Agenda February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Discussion of storm water analysis for 6900 block Xerxes Avenue. Background: The engineering firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates (OSM) was hired to perform a feasibility study of the storm drainage system which drains to the 6900 block between Washburn and Xerxes Avenue. The study is now completed. The history of this area, results of the OSM study, and possible corrective action are outlined in an attached report. Action can be taken on this project during the Capital Improvement Program discussions later this year or earlier if the Council desires. Action could be taken on this project during Capital Improvement Program discussions later this year. Because a 1991 Capital Budget has already been adopted, staff is currently proposing to schedule the project for 1992 construction. However, there is some logic and desirability to having the work done in 1991. If the Council desires, and indicates a willingness to revise the 1991 Capital Budget to accommodate this project, the work could be designed and built in 1991. Recommended Motion: None required. However, Council should indicate if effort should be made to do the work in 1991. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The low area within the 6900 block between Xerxes and Washburn Avenues has experienced repeated flooding. 2. The drainage area tributary to the depression on Xerxes Avenue is approximately 30% greater than that originally anticipated in the April, 1988 study. 3. When the York Avenue improvements proposed by the City of Edina are in place, two garages will be subject to inundation during a rainfall event having a 20% chance of occurrence in any given year (a 5 year return frequency) occurs. A rainfall event having between a 20% and 4% chance of occurrence in any given year (between a 5 and 25 year return frequency event) could result in the structural inundation of selected homes in the mid-block area of Xerxes Avenue. 4. To prevent structures in this area from being inundated during rainfall events having up to a 1% chance of occurrence in any given year (a 100 year return frequency event), additional capacity could be provided by constructing a gravity (42") storm sewer along Xerxes Avenue to Adams Hill Pond at an estimated cost of $572,000. 5. The new pump for the Adams Hill Storm Water Lift Station was installed late in 1990, so the increase in storm water to Adam's Hill Pond can be accommodated. 6. The storm sewer utility could fund the cost of improvements. 7. The work could be done in 1991, or 1992, with timely direction by the City Council. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Do not make any storm sewer improvements in the vicinity of the 6900 block between Washburn and Xerxes Avenue. 2. Do not make any storm sewer improvements in this vicinity at this time. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is scheduled for discussion at the February 4, 1991 City Council Study Session. No formal action is required at this time. Should the Council desire, and indicate a willingness to revise the 1991 Capital Budget to accommodate this project, the work could be designed and built in 1991. The Council would still take action under the policy of purchase in excess of $5,000 or under the legal requirements for award of contract(s). The Council would systematically review and take action on a Revised 1991 operating budget for the storm sewer utility and a Revised 1991 Capital Budget during the Budget Hearings typically held in the fall and winter of the year. Resp ully submitted, Ja? Prosser City Manager JDP/sdr 0 Report: 6900 Block of Xerxes Avenue - Storm Water Analysis The engineering firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates (OSM) was hired to perform a feasibility study of the storm drainage system which drains to the 6900 block between Washburn and Xerxes Avenue. The study is now completed. The purpose of this memo is to update council members on the history of this area, present the results of the OSM study, and discuss corrective action. Action can be taken on this project during the Capital Improvement Program discussions later this year or earlier if the Council desires. 1. History The low area within the 6900 block between Xerxes and Washburn Avenues has experienced repeated flooding. The stormwater study which followed the 1987 "Superstorm" ranked this area ninth on the priority list of project based upon benefit cost ratios. The top eight were approved for construction, although some were rejected by the affected neighborhoods. Residents on the block contend that the flooding occurs more often than the two percent per year chance indicated in the original study. A June 28, 1990 rainfall of approximately 1.25 inches in one-half hour caused water to enter one of the walkout basements on the block. The high water mark of that June 28, 1990 storm was checked against the computer model of the area, which was generated as part of the 1987 study. Apparently, the model had underestimated the flooding in the area because the model indicated no damage should have occurred. 2. Results of Hydrologic Analysis The drainage area tributary to the depression on Xerxes Avenue is approximately 30% greater than that originally estimated in the April, 1988 study. This previous model assumed that when storm drainage improvements proposed for Edina were in place, that the drainage area generally west of Xerxes Avenue along 69th Street would be directed to the York Avenue drainage system. When the York Avenue improvements proposed by the City of Edina are in place, two garages will be subject to inundation during a rainfall event having a 20% chance of occurrence in any given year (a 5 year return frequency) occurs. A rainfall event having between a 20% and 4% chance of occurrence in any given year (between a 5 and 25 year return frequency event) could result in the structural inundation of selected homes in the mid-block area of Xerxes Avenue. The results outlined above were based on using a hydrologic model that was checked and calibrated against the 1-1/4 inch rainfall that occurred in a 30 minute period in the June 28, 1990 storm. This new hydrologic model predicted high water elevations in the area to within two inches of that measured for this specific rainfall event. 0 3. Discussion of Corrective Actions To prevent structures in this area from being inundated during rainfall events having up to a 1% chance of occurrence in any given year (a 100 year return frequency event), additional capacity could be provided by constructing a gravity (42") storm sewer along Xerxes Avenue to Adams Hill Pond at an estimated cost of $572,000. This design would not only increase the capacity of the storm sewer system in the mid-block of Xerxes Avenue, but also relieve some of the pressure exerted on the 70th Street storm sewer system by runoff directed to it as it travels easterly toward Wood Lake. It is anticipated that this improvement would divert a flow rate of approximately 25 cfs (cubic feet/second) from the 70th Street storm sewer system. This additional capacity could be utilized to accommodate stormwater runoff generated from areas along 70th Street as it carries water towards Wood Lake. This includes runoff from the area in the vicinity of 70th and Penn, which has been observed to have some problems with structural inundation during major rainfall events. The new pump for the Adam's Hill Storm Water Lift Station was installed late in 1990, so the increase in storm water to Adam's Hill Pond can be accommodated. Action can be taken on this project during Capital Improvement Program discussions later this year. Because a 1991 Capital Budget has already been adopted, staff is currently proposing to schedule the project for 1992 construction. However, there is some logic and desirability to having the work done in 1991. If the Council desires, and indicates a willingness to revise the 1991 Capital Budget to accommodate this project, the work could be designed and built in 1991. Staff would need to be notified soon if the work is to be done in 1991. • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 3 Agenda February 4, 1991 Issue Statement: Annual Meeting of the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization. Background: The Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management District was formed in 1984 to coordinate our storm water management planning as mandated by the State of Minnesota. In order to maintain local control of stormwater in the southeast portion of the City, Richfield decided to form their own Watershed Management District with Bloomington rather than join an existing Watershed Management District. The eighth annual organizational meeting will be held on Monday, February 4, 1991 at 5:30 PM in the Richfield City Council Chambers, 6700 Portland Avenue. The agenda packet for the meeting is attached. Recommended Motion: This study session letter is for informational purposes; no formal action is necessary as a City Council. However, the attached agenda packet indicates there is some action required of the Board of Commissioners at the February 4 meeting. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management District Board of Commissioners are to hold an annual meeting each year at a time and place determined by the Chairman. 2. The meeting has been scheduled on the first available date for all parties and at a time to allow all parties to attend other meetings later in the evening. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: The annual meeting of the Board of Commissioners for the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization will be held at 5:30 PM, Monday, February 4, in the Richfield City Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, Jam Prosser Cit anager JDP/reb Attachments RICHFIELD-BLOOMINGTON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION A G E N D A TO: Board of Commissioners of the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization FROM: Charles Honchell, Executive Director SUBJECT: Annual Meeting of the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization - Meeting #8 The annual meeting of the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization is scheduled for 5:30 P.M., February 4, 1991 in the Richfield City Council Chambers, 6700 Portland Avenue South. A light lunch will be served at that time. The meeting should be over by 6:30 P.M. to allow commencement of the regularly scheduled Council meetings. Topics of discussion: 1. Approval of minutes of February 26, 1990. (SEE ATTACHMENT) 2. Election of officers 3. Appointment of Executive Director and Assistant Executive Director 4. Status of the RBWMO Master Plan - Approved by Board of Water & Soil Resources 1/23/91 (SEE ATTACHMENT) 5. New State Law & Subsequent proposed Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) Rule Changes (SEE ATTACHMENT) - Membership - Audit - Annual Report to Citizens 6. Minnesota River Quality Requirements (SEE ATTACHMENT) 7. EPA Non-Point Discharge Permits 8. Projects and Studies in the District - Mall of America - Smith Pond 9. Insurance for the RBWMO (SEE ATTACHMENT) 0 RBWMO AGENDA February 4, 1991 Page 2 10. Other Business 11. Adjourn CH/rb Attachments: Minutes of Meeting of February 26, 1990 BWSR Order Approving Watershed Management Plan BWSR Summary of 1990 Water Management Task Force Legislation Minnesota River Quality Requirements Memo Regarding Insurance for RBWMO 0 RICHFIELD -BLOOMINGTON WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ST. LOU.-- PARK L l• C' r 1 , mow, s ? z • a ? i' LL_,••PK1•J^ •?• 11 ?` w•do../ow Lol• s Lol• Lob* lldttl.l 1410-61" Z' u i s ~ r1. • ` L0016 Mlrtp Q Lal• ? ? ? IMYosI• r r!1 ? 1 4 'd ?1?IIbt1? 4'.? / h Lake co at •! • ?,/ /mar Lobe ` Richfield np Q Loa• d !? Y Q ?••. •)• En.ul LAM q Lol Lake • Corm 110 AIRPORT rbod DEN a Lobo YH U z:w OUR folr? ?t 1',H T GYe Ldke$ /4i\i•. Iona a v, M(? Loo soak :7 -Z CAMN Lem + NOAD "oend e LAM c Mr+asce• J/ • AIM./11 1 c r1/j KR1.J,?..?. WLZS 1 1 an" FIGURE 1: LOCATION ! Tfiu " I 0 Unapproved Minutes Meeting a7 Annual Meeting Call to Order RICHFIELD-BLOOMINGTON WATER MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION 5:30 P.M. February 26, 1990 Bloomington City Hall The annual meeting of the Richfield-Bloomington Water Management Organization was called to order by Chairman Martin Kirsch. Bloomington Mayor Neil Peterson welcomed the members of the organization to Bloomington. Roll Call Present: Chairman Kirsch, Vice Chairman Tom Spies (who arrived at 6 p.m.), Secretary Edwina Garcia, Treasurer Neil Peterson, Commissioners Herbst, Houle, Mahon (who arrived at 6:05 p.m.), and Schuler of Bloomington, and Commissioners ludeman, Ouam and Sandahl of Richfield. Also present: Executive Director Charles Nonchell of Bloomington and Assistant Executive Director James Prosser of Richfield. Absent: Commissioner Carol Johnson of Bloomington. Approval of Minutes Motion was made by Sandahl, seconded by Garcia, and all present voting aye, to approve the minutes of the annual meeting of February 12, 1989, as presented. The motion carried 9.0. Election of Officers motion was made by Peterson, seconded by Sandahl, and all present voting aye, to re•etect the present state of officers, Chairman Kirsch, Vice Chairman Spies, Secretary Garcia anc Treasurer Peterson for another term. The nation carried 9.0. intment of Executive Motion was made by Garcia, seconded by Sandahl, and all present voting aye, to ector and Assistant reappoint the incumbent Executive Director Charles Monchell and Assistant Executive Executive Director Director James Prosser for another term. The nation carried 9.0. Smith Pond Lawsuit The Executive Director said the lawsuit brought by the property owners near Smith Pond in Bloomington for damages suffered in the flood of 1987 is still pending. He said the attorneys for the City of Bloomington advised the attorneys for the plaintiffs that they wished to accelerate this suit so it can be brought to a resolution. He said the plaintiffs, attorneys requested further information from both the Cities of Bloomington and Richfield which has been furnished to them. Mr. Nonchell said Bloomington has made extensive improvements in the Smith Pond area, which should alleviate any further flooding. he said these improvements, which are incorporated in the Watershed Management Plan, will be discussed by Scott Thureen, Bloomington Drainage Engineer, in his review of modifications to that document. Modifications to Scott Thureen, Bloomington Drainage Engineer, reviewed the modifications that have been Watershed Management made to the Watershed Management Plan for the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Manage- Plan ment Organization. He noted that copies of the draft report were submitted to the commissioners with their agenda material. Me said following submission of the plan to the State Board of Water and Soil Resources for review and approval, a letter was received from that Board in July of 1989 delaying approval of the plan until further information was submitted regarding surface water management in the Smith Pond Area. He noted that modifications made to the Plan between October 1986 and February 1989 were underlined and the portions printed in italics identify changes made in response to the Water and Soil Resources Board. Page 1 February 26, 1990 ltr? al Mr. Thureen used a map to illustrate the areas where improvements were constructed. He said a playlot in Fenlason Park was excavated to provide storage and a diversion chamber at the Richfield-Bloomington border was constructed which allows water from Richfield to flow into the storm sewer in 1.494. He said this results in diverting 90% of the water that formerly came from Richfield into Smith Pond in Bloomington, and takes care of the 100-year event. He said the new pipe placed in 82nd Street to Cedar Avenue will serve as the primary outlet for Smith Pond, and.the outlet to Wright's lake was also modified with a pipe tying it into the new Cedar Avenue system. He said other probtW areas on 90th Street at Bloomington Avenue and 16th Avenue Circle were resolved by placement of a second pipe in 90th Street. Mr. Thureen said a request was submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to revise the flood insurance rate map to take into account the improvements that have been put in place. He said the changes that were made result in the 100-year flood elevation being lowered from 817.1 feet to 814.9 feet, which'means that only the area within the confines of Smith Park itself would be in the 100-year floodptain for which flood insurance is required. He said this would alleviate the requirement for homeowners previously included in the floodplain to carry flood insurance. Mr. Honchell noted that it was not a City requirement that these property owners carry flood insurance but this was a requirement of the mortgage companies. He said this requirement has affected persons in the area wishing to sell their homes. I?z Discussion was held on the modifications to the Watershed Management Plan and a Richfield Public Works representative said the drainage patterns in Richfield were not changed because of the improvements made in Bloomington. He noted that improvements had previously been made in Richfield to direct water into Wilson Pond. 9 Vice Chairman Spies arrived at 6 p.m. R • • • • R Following discussion, motion was made by ludeman, seconded by Sandahl, and all present voting aye, to approve the modifications to the Watershed Management Plan. the motion carried 10-0. Mr. Honchelt said as a result of these modifications to the plan, it is hoped that the State Board of Water and Soil Resources will set up another meeting for review of the plan. He suggested that when that review hearing is held that some of the WMO commis- sioners will attend. He said that at the previous public hearing, the BWSR members left with the impression that the WMO commissioners did not take the development of the plan seriously because no commissioners were present at the hearing. Commissioner Mahon arrived at 6:05 p.m. during discussion of the following item. f • Legislation re Metro The Executive Director said he had included in the packets of information for this Council Receiving meeting a newspaper article quoting the Chairman of the Metropolitan Council calling for Storm Water Authority more authority to be given that body to establish storm drainage as a metropolitan system with full Metro Council approval authority as they have for sewer treatment systems, highways and regional parks. He said he is requesting that the WMO oppose Page 2 February 26, 1990 granting this approval to the Metro Council, and to adopt the resolution he had F 3 submitted setting forth its reasons for opposing additional authorities to oversee storm drainage operations. Mr. Honchell said a previous attempt by the Metro Council to have this authority led to the so-called 509 law which set up all of the watershed management organizations in the metropolitan area. He said he opposes giving the Metro Council the authority to oversee storm drainage because it oftentimes is not cognizant of the local units of government problems when it sets priorities for various items. He said if the resolution was approved it would be submitted to the state legislators as well as to the Richfield- Bloomington representative on the Metro Council. 'Herbst said the Legislature had appointed a task force to study water resources and its report has been issued, which led to the Citizens League and Metro Council developing the concept now being proposed. He said he agreed with the wording in the resolution in concept but felt there should be an amendment to state that cities haven't had the opportunity to review the task force's report, and additional time is needed to complete this review before decisions are made to modify the management process. In addition, he suggested that the league of Minnesota Cities as well as the Association of Metropolitan municipalities be asked to take a position on this matter. Spies said the AMM is aware of the report but hasn't discussed it. Ludeman said he, too, has not had a chance to study the task force report. Mahon asked if there was further information about the background of the Metro Council's desire for authority. Mr. Honchell said he did not feel the Metro Council intended to move boundaries of the various watershed districts but wants to have the ultimate authority to approve plans and set priorities for any proposed improvements. Following discussion, motion was made by ludeman, seconded by Sandahl, and all present voting aye, to adopt the resolution with the amendment proposed by Herbst that additional time is needed to review the task force report before any decisions are made to modify the management process. The motion carried 11.0. Update on the Mail The Executive Director said he had requested Jim Gates, Bloomington Deputy Director of of America Project Public Works, to present a status report on the construction of the Mall of America project. Mr. Gates said the footings and a portion of the wall for the Knott's Berry Farm portion of the project has begun at the southeastern portion of the site. He said two seven level parking decks will be installed on the east and west sides of the Mall structure, a change from the previous plan that called for four parking decks. The decks on the north and south sides of the structure have been deleted but the ixmber of parking spaces remain the same. Using a model of the Mall to illustrate his remarks, Mr. Gates explained the location of the various items. He said the developer expects to set steel beginning in March, and to date about 300,000 cubic yards of material have been excavated and placed east of 24th Avenue. He said in accordance with the Erosion Protection Plan, the developer placed a chain link fence around the perimeter of the site with a silt fence against that fence. He said at each access they have placed a rock berm to stop silt going into the roadways. He said a ditch has been placed to divert storm water runoff into a holding area with a skimmer before the water goes into the existing storm sewer. He said ditch blocks are also in place. Mr. Gates said State Highway construction for Cedar Avenue will be substantially completed in 1990 and in 1991 the temporary Killebrew connection will be eliminated with construction of the road between 81st and Killebrew Drive. He said in conjunction with Richfield, the 12th Avenue ramp at 494 will be directly affected. He said that frontage has been widened, and during 1990 there will be a temporary access off of 494 to be used Page 3 February 26, 1990 11 fiU?l p?{ flatters of mutual oncern Adjourn Meeting for the 12th Avenue exit. He said that will be one way between Bloomington Avenue and 12th Avenue. The Chairman asked if there were any other matters to be discussed. Sandahl asked whether the situation with Bloomingdale's would have any effect on the Mall. Mr. Monchell said Bloomingdale's did declare bankruptcy but the bankruptcy court is considering allowing them to go into the Mall because of the value it has placed on that venture. Peterson said a petition has been made to the court to allow them to go into the Mall, and it could be eight to ten months before it would be settled. He said Bloomingdale's cannot take on any new activity in that time. Me said the developer is presently operating on a $65 million personal loan as no mortgage has as yet been placed on the property. Mahon said there was a resident of the neighborhood of Smith Pond who was present, and questioned whether she had any comments. Mary Lu Anderson, 8300 Chicago Avenue, said she would like to have a copy of the flood insurance rate map which had been discussed. Richfield Mayor Guam expressed his appreciation for the support that Bloomington has given to Richfield in regard to the airport. Me said both cities are aware of the economic benefits to both of the airport at its present location. Lyle Olson, Bloomington Director of Administrative Services, said a staff meeting of representatives from Richfield and Bloomington will be held next week to discuss some of these issues. Guam said Richfield did get some input regarding potential uses from the Metropolitan Airports Commission when it was putting together its new Fordtown proposal. Richfield City Manager Prosser said the extension of runway 4.22 frequently came up during those discussions but there was no attempt to tell the city what to do. Guam said he understands there is a space problem with the extension of this runway at the C and D complex that must be resolved before it goes further. Prosser noted that MAC in its Environmental Impact Statement had indicated the importance of the extension of the runway was to provide better use of the preferential runway system and to provide a longer runway for international flights. Mahon disagreed that was the purpose, saying if the runway was extended, it would result in more flights departing over Richfield and Bloomington. Prosser said it is important that the Richfield and Bloomington City Councils keep each other informed of their positions on airport matters. He said before any changes to those positions are made he felt there would be a need for more specifics. The Chairman expressed appreciation to the Bloomington members of the 4M0 for their hospitality. Motion was made by Mahon, seconded by Sandahl, and all present voting aye, to adjourn the meeting at 6:40 p.m. Evelynne Thompson Acting Secretary • Page 4 February 26, 1990 f ?c'r ? f Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resour. 155 South Wabasha Street Suite 104 St. Paul, Minnesota 55107 In the Matter of Reviewin; the Watershed ORDER Management Plan for the Richfield-Bloomington APPROVING Watershed Management Organization (Minnesota WATERSHED Sr nites 1988. Section 473.87. Subdivision 7) MANAGEMENT PLAN The'Board of Com :tissioners of the Riche-?d-Blocmungtor. Watershed Management Organization (RBWMO) filed a Watershed Management Plan (Plan) on February 8, 1988 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 473.878, subdivision 7. The Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (Board) published notice of filing of the Plan and in response to a written request for hearing conducted a public hearing on the Plan on May 18, 1988. Having considered the entire record, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order: 0 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The "V MO was established by joint powers agreement on December 19, 1983 between the cities of Richfield and Bloomington. 2. The Metropolitan Water Management Act requires the preparation of a watershed management plan for the area, meeting the requirements of both Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 112 and Sections 473.875 to 473.883 (recodified by 1990 Laws of Minnesota, Chapter 391, as Chapter 103D and Sections 103B.201-251, respectively). 3. The RBWMO completed a draft Plan on October 28, 1986, and submitted it to affected local units of governa:ent for review and comment. 4. On April 15, 1987 the Metropolitan Council's Environmental Resources Committee reviewed the plan and recommended that the RBWMO coordinate a program of data collection to define the extent of impacts from storm water runoff on Long Meadow Lake's water quality. The Council also recommended that the RBWMO should implement measures to prevent or mitigate the identified impacts on the lake. On April 23, 1987 the Metropolitan Council accepted the Plan recommendations made by its Environmental Resources Committee and transmitted them to the Board on May 8, 1987. 5. On June 24, 1987 the Minnesota Fiver Valley National Wildlife Refuge's manager Ed Crozier sent a letter to the RBWMO expressing concern regarding the quality of stormwater runoff discharging into the floodplain lakes and marshes within the refuge. 6. On February 3, 1988 the Board received written comments on the Plan from the Director of the Division of Water Ouality of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 7. On February 8, 1988 the RBWMO submitted the Plan to the Board for review. 8. The Board published its Notice of Filing of Watershed Plan in the Richfield Sun-Current and the Bloomington Sun-Current on February 17 and 24, 1988. The notice described the general content of the Plan and stated that the Plan was available for inspection at the Board's office and at the office of the City Engineer for the City of Bloomington at 9750 James Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431, or the office of the City Engineer for the City of Richfield at 6700 Portland Avenue, Richfield, Minnesota S5423. The notice further stated that any person objecting to the proposed Plan could submit a written request for hearing, and that if no requests for hearing were received, the Board would make a decision on the Plan without conducting a public hearing. 9. On March 3, 1988 Kim Benson and Dan Steward of the Board's staff toured the 0 RBWMO with Brian Borg of the RBWMO staff. 10. On March 10, 1988 Brian Borg, Ed Crozier, Kim Benson and Dan Steward met to discuss the Plan and Board staff suggestions for clarifications and additions. 11. On March 21, 1988 Brian Borg furnished Board staff-with the Plan clarifications and additions agreed upon at their March 10, 1988 meeting, including the following: a statement supporting development of uniform erosion control standards; a map of the Long Meadow Lake area, a statement recognizing that the Minnesota River Valley National. Wildlife-Refuge will be the lead agency in developing a water quality study of Long Meadow Lake, a list of options for increasing the treatment of stormwater runoff to the lake, a summary of water quality monitoring data relating to the lake, a process and a timetable for pursuing water quality studies of the lake, and a summary of the effect of the 1987 summer storm on the RBWMO. 12. On March 24, 1988 the Board received a written request forbearing from Marilu Anderson of Bloomington. 13. On April 14, 1988 the Board issued an Order for and Notice of Hearing. 0 2 y L/ 4. The Board conducted a public hearing on the Plan on May 18, 1988 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Bloomington City Council Chambers, 2215 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, MN 55431. The Board was represented by members Don Ogaard, Loni Kemp, William Cofell, and Douglas Bade; and staff members Mel Sian and Dan Steward. The RBtiWiO was represented by City of Bloomington staff members Brian Borg and Russ Langseth. A number of concerned RBWMO residents were present. 15. At the May 18, 1988 public hearing Brian Borg presented an overview of the Plan and described three main flood hazard areas, including the Srnith Pond area. Jack Aldridge, on behalf of certain concerned residents of the Smith Pond area, offered a written statement with attachments that primarily presented concerns about how the Plan addressed the flooding problems in the Smith Pond area (Public Exhibit No. 12). Jack Aldridge also provided verbal testimony about the Smith Pond area and its history of flooding problems. 16. The Board considered the Plan at its May 25, 1988 meeting. Board members who attended the hearing recommended that the Plan not be approved until amended to include a clear plan of action for reducing the flood damage potential in the Smith Pond area. 17. On June 28, 1989 the Board received a letter from Russ Langseth of the City of Bloomington describing the improvements being constructed to reduce flood hazards in the Smith Pond area and requesting approval of the Plan. The letter was accompanied by correspondence from Terrence E. Huntrods of TKDA stating that the stormwater improvements would reduce the 100.year flood elevation of Smith Pond from 817.01 to 814.90. 18. On July 31, 1989 Board staff member Mel Sinn wrote a letter to RBWMO Executive Director Charles Honchell acknowledging receipt of the letter from Russ Langseth and stating that Board staff would recommend approval of the Plan upon receipt of two Plan supplements: a) available historical aerial photos overlaid on a current street map to indicate the location and extent of the natural surface water storage and retention areas existing prior to watershed urbanization; and b) appropriate updated Plan elements needed to reflect pertinent improvement projects, studies, etc. completed since the Plan was initially drafted. 19. On December 19, 1991 Charles Honchell transmitted a revised Plan to the Board that described stormwater system improvements constructed since the initial Plan was prepared. He also submitted half-section aerial photo maps for the Smith Pond area for the years 1953 and 1985 with street map overlays. These maps show that natural retention areas were affected by urban development. The improvements in the Smith Pond area included a partial diversion of stormwater from Richfield via the 1.494 stormsewer system, a new 42" stormsewer along 82nd Street, and replacement of the is 3 T PY pumped outlet at the southeast corner of Smith Pond with a fixed weir outlet. The Plan revisions also state that the Federal Emergency Management Agency approved revisions to the desigated flood plain in the Smith Pond area on May 31, 1990, based on Bloomington's stormwater improvements. 20. Board staff informed Marilu Anderson by phone of the submittal of the revised Plan and supplemental maps. Board staff communicated with Scott Thureen of the City of Bloomington by phone regarding the content of the revised Plan and slaps. Scott Thureen said the RBWMO also was willing to change the year the Plan is intended to extend through from 2000 to 1995. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. All relevant, substantive, and procedural requirements of law and rule have been fulfilled. The Board has proper jurisdiction in the matter of approving a Watershed Management Plan for the RBWMO. 2. The RBWMO Plan attached to this Order states water and water-related problems within the RBWMO, possible solutions thereto, general objectives and policies of the RBWMO, and a management plan. The attached Plan is in conformance with the requirements of Minnesota Watershed Act and the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. IT IS 'X',>;I.'EREFORE ORDERED That the Board hereby approves the attached Plan as the Watershed Management Plan for the Richfield-Bloomington Watershed Management Organization. Dated at Saint Paul, Minnesota, this 23rd day of January 1991. MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES Donald H. Ogaard Chairman t 4 11UAit s 1990 Metropolitan Loml Water Management Task Force Legislation (Chapter No. 601, Senate File No. 1894) Section Summary by BWSR 5115190 Section # Summary 1 Requires BWSR to submit their annual report to the legislative water commission instead of LCNIR and to include a status report on 509 plan implementation. 2 Minor classification of 1101330 3 Revision of NIS 112.42, Subd. 3. Requires counties to appoint manaeers of met: opolitan watershed districts from a list of nominees from cities and towns. 4 Creates NIS 112.4305. Requires metropolitan watershed districts to establish a technical advisorv committee. 4E 5 Creates NIS 473.157. Requires the Metropolitan Council to adopt a water resources plan which includes management objectives and target pollution loads. 6 Amends MS 473.875. Clarifies purpose of 509. Future revisions of some plans will have to be upgraded to better manage such things as water quality, wildlife and recreation. 7 Creates MS 473.876, Subd. 6a. Defines what a 'subwatershed" is. 8 Revisions to MS 473.877, Subd. 1. Requires BWSR to adopt rules for JPA content. Mandates no more than a 2/3 vote for CIPs and majority vote for policy items. S 9 Creates NIS 473.8775. Subd. 1 - WA10s must notify BWSR of appointments and vacancies. Subd. 2 - Requires publication of notices of board member vacancies. Subd. 3 - Removal of board members for just cause. ' Subd. 4 - Requires one published written communication each year. Subd. 5 - Requires Nk-h1Os to solicit RFPs for professional services every two years. Subd. 6 - Requires BWSR to facilitate formation of an Association of NVIviOS. Subd. 7 - Allows NN MOs to accept transfer of public ditches. 10 Requires either 1108 or 509 planning for currently exempt areas. 11 Revises NIS 473.878, Subd. la. Minor clarification. 12 Revises MS 473.878, Subd. 2. Provides sanctions for non-performing WMOs, including withbold of state funding, delegation of regulatory authority and water related permits. 13 Adds MS 473.878, Subd. 3, (f). Requires coordination of planning with contiguous 509 and 1108 planning activities. 14 Revises MS 473.878, Subd. 4. Requires the BWSR to promulgate rules for plan content including: performance standards minim Lm re4uire......:s capital improvement program specifications nature of official controls needed 1TEU ?5 ?l Section # Summary 15 Revises MS 473.878, Subd. 6. Requires the Met Council to advise BWSR whether plans conform to regional objectives and target pollution loads. 16 Revises NIS 473.878, Subd. 8. Requires the BWSR to adopt rules for determining whether R7,IOs are implementing plans. 17 Creates NIS 473, Subd. 10. Requires BWSR to review each WMO plan every five years and recommend appropriate changes. 18 Creates NIS 473.878, Subd. 11. Requires BWSR to respond to complaints of failure to implement and to establish a procedure for resolving disputes. 19 Creates MS 473.878, Subd. 12. Requires BWSR to promulgate rules for: annual financial reports standards for annual financial and performance audits • content for annual activity reports 20 Creates MS 473.8-0. Requires BWSR to review rules every five years and adopt amendments. 21 Revises NIS 473.879, Subd. 2. Requires BWSR to adopt rules for local plan standards and a model enNironmental ordinance. 22 Revises NIS 473.&S1. Allows NV`NlOs and local units of government to accumulate levy receipts as an alternative to issuing bonds (subject to limitations of MS 275.50 to 275.56). 23 Revised MS 473.882, Subd. 1. Allows LUGS to establish a watershed management tax district for CIPs on a subwatershed basis. 24 Revises NIS 473.883, Subd. 3. Minor clarification. 25 Revises :NIS 473.583, Subd. 6. Minor clarification. 26 Revises MS 473.883, Subd. 7. Minor clarification. 27 Requires all Metro ditch authorities to submit a report to the B«'SR by July 1, 1992 on the condition of the ditches under their jurisdiction. 28 Requires the BWSR and Met Council to coordinate agency activities and technical assistance to WMOs and local governments. 29 Specifies that Sections 5 to 28 applies to all 7 metro counties. 30 Allows BWSR to expend S57,000 in FY 91 to finance additional workload from a)dsting budget. 31 31 Establishes July 1, 1992 as the effective date for certain WMO requirements such as: publication of notice of vacancies, annual publication of written communication and annual reporting requirements. 0 H:\USR\BRUCE\1894SEC'T.I0N r] • sou, U A K O 1 O W A MINNESOTA RIVER 0 E COUNCIL'S ROLE AND CONCERNS 0 BLUE LAKE & SENECA WWTP NPDES PERMITS JULY 1, 1988 COMPLIANCE DEADLINE LOAD ALLOCATION MINNESOTA RIVER HEADWATER & BENTHIC LOADS 0 STATE CONSENT DECREE --- FEBRUARY 1988 $184 MILLION EXPANSION & UPGRADE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MPCA/MWCC/COUNCIL 0 EPA/MPCA PLANNING GOAL --- JANUARY 1990 40% NPS LOAD REDUCTION - JULY 1996 0 1990 AMENDMENTS TO SURFACE WATER ACT ESTABLISH MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES & TARGET POLLUTION LOADS ADVISORY TASK FORCE COORDINATE WITH BWSR 0 FEDERAL CONSENT DECREE 0 1992 NPDES PERMITS 0 TTfA4 0(p P.3 • WMO'S & WD'S ROLE 0 509 PLAN IN METRO AREA PROTECT NATURAL STORAGE AREAS MINIMIZE CAPITAL COSTS PROTECT AND IMPROVE WATER QUALITY ESTABLISH UNIFORM POLICIES AND CNTLS PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL INTO WATER GROUNDWATER RECHARGE ENHANCE HABITAT AND RECREATION 0 12/15 PLANS REVIEWED BY COUNCIL 0 BWSR REVISING RULES--NEW PLANS 1995 0 ZTw 4? pq • WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE COUNCIL PLANNING ? 1991 STATE OF THE WATERSHED . LAKES, CREEKS AND RIVER QUALITY ? 1992 INTERIM PLAN o MINNESOTA RIVER o MGMT PLAN & POLICIES o TARGET POLLUTION LOADS ? 1993 FINAL PLAN' o MISSISSIPPI RIVER o ST CROIX RIVER ? TASK FORCE o TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUP -- 21 o POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 0 Johnson & Higgins, Inc. 1600 Lincoln Centre 333 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-2400 612 349 9700 Answer2back00KERODEN"MPS RELEI ED h"J'27 C 1 $ 1990 Fax: 612 349 9776 10 OHNSON HIGGINS Esiaousheo 1845 December 13, 1990 • Ms. Melanie Ault City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Re: Richfield/Bloomington Watershed Joint Powers Association Dear Melanie: Before you took over the responsibility of insurance, Steve had submitted some applications to us for the Richfield Bloomington Watershed Joint Powers AssociatI011 so we could obtain a quotation. We have finally received a quotation from Northstar Risk Services. The quotation is as follows: General Liability Errors & Omissions Hired & Non-owned Automobiles Total estimated annual premium $1,000 estimated annual premium $1,200 estimated annual premium $ 91 estimated annual premium $2,291 $250 property damage deductible for general liability and $2,500 deductible under the errors and omissions. Steve was going to present this quotation to the Bloomington Richfield Watershed Joint Powers Association to see if they wanted to purchase coverage. This is the only way that coverage will be provided for anyone serving on this Joint Powers Association. Richfield cannot cover its people only. The Joint Powers Association must purchase a separate policy for themselves as an entity. This is similar to the way we have the South Hennepin Adaptive policy in force. If the organization wants to bind coverage we'll need a letter from the organization designating Johnson & Higgins as the Agent of Record before we can bind this coverage. 0 Johnson & Higgins Page 2 December 13, 1990 Ms. Melanie Ault L i c-m A P. 3 I will wait to hear from you. If you.should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Debbie Pearson Middle Market Department (612)349-9783 cc: S. Schaefer J&H Minneapolis DP/smp 1234 • 0