12-09-92 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1992
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
1. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF CITY OF RICHFIELD 1992
REVISED/1993 PROPOSED BUDGET AND 1993 PROPOSED TAX LEVY
ADJOURNMENT
AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE
UPON REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN ADVANCE
• TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702.
0
1993 BUDGET
• ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO THE 1993 PROPOSED BUDGET
1. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
2. PAGE 13 - TOTAL NUMBER OF FULL-TIME PERSONNEL
3. PAGES E-8 AND E-14 - TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY FOR
LYNDALE AND PENN LIQUOR STORES. (701-4814/4834)
4. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1993 AND LEVYING TAXES
5. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF 1992 BUDGET VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
6. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES ON
IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1973
7. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES ON
REDEVELOPMENT BONDS OF 1977
8. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES ON
REFUNDING BONDS OF 1978
8. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES ON
THE IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1980
9. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE DISCONTINUATION OF THE IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
• 1967 DEBT SERVICE FUND AND TRANSFER OF SURPLUS
10. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
11. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1994-1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROGRAM
12. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES, WATER
RATES AND CHARGES, SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES, STORM SEWER RATES AND
CHARGES AND 5% PENALTY ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
13. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARD HEALTH, TERM LIFE AND
DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES
14. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE DECEMBER 1992 GENERAL SERVICES SALARY
COMPENSATION PLAN
15. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE DECEMBER 1992 MANAGEMENT SALARY COMPENSATION
PLAN
16. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 GENERAL SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
17. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 MANAGEMENT SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
18. RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 SPECIALIZED PAY PLAN
• 19. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1993 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX DPOF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7839
i
• 6700 Portland Avenue • Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599
City Manager Mayor Council
James D. Prosser Martin Kirsch William Bullock Michael Sandahl
Ivan Ludeman Kristal Stokes
.December 9, 1992
The Honorable Mayor
and
Members of the City.Council
City of Richfield
Subject: Budget Message for the 1993 Proposed Fund Budgets and the
1992 Revised Fund Budgets
Council Members:
In accordance with the Charter of the City of Richfield, submitted for your
consideration are the recommended budgets for the City of Richfield for the
period January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993 and for the remainder.of the
calendar year 1992. Hearings on the proposed budget are scheduled for
• December 9, with a .reconvene date of December 16, if necessary.
Pursuant to law, the City Council must certify the new budget and' the revenue
required to be raised by ad valorem tax levy to the County Auditor. The
deadline for the certification is December 28, 1992. A proposed 1993 tax levy
must be submitted to the County Auditor on or before September 15, 1992. Any
amendments to the proposed budget which would increase the property tax levy
must be made prior to the September 15, 1992 proposed levy certification
deadline. No increases in tax levy are permissible after that date, only
reductions.
The resolution required to certify the budget and the levy has been prepared
based on the proposed budget. This resolution, together with the proposed
resolution revising the 1992 budget, may be found in the last section of the
budget document.
OVERVIEW PROSPECTIVE
.The 1993 budget reflects the fourth year under an amended property tax law.
The law was modified in 1990, significantly reducing the amount of Local
Government Aid (LGA) paid by the State of Minnesota to cities. LGA is a
program which utilizes sales and income tax revenues to reduce the property
tax burden in cities with a relatively weak property tax base. Prior to the
recent shift in the State's revenue philosophy the LGA program had been
extremely successful in leveling local property tax rates between the State's
wealthiest cities and those with a lower valued tax base.
• ? •
The Urban Hometown
Telephone (612) 861-9700
Fax 861-9749
An Equal Opportunity, Employer
Since 1990 the LGA reductions to Richfield have been extremely significant.
For example, in 1990 Richfield was originally certified to receive a LGA
payment of $4,433,285. However, through the cutbacks in LGA, many of which
were announced at least half-way through the respective fiscal year in which
they were certified, LGA has been reduced to $3,015,710 for 1992. In 1993,
the City has been certified a 3% increase from the previous year's level.
Unfortunately, the State is facing another projected revenue shortfall for
1993, leaving the amount of LGA for 1993 uncertain at best. To compensate for
the loss of LGA, the State of Minnesota has allowed cities to levy additional
local property taxes. Despite the drastic cuts in LGA and the timing of these
reductions, the City is projecting a balanced budgetl for both 1992 and 1993.
The shift in state aids away from the cities, as portrayed by the cuts in
Local Government Aid,' continue to be very problematic to cities such as
Richfield. Richfield is heavily dependent upon Local Government Aids, and is
effected more severely than many other cities when state aids are reduced.
With the shift.now occurring, property tax relief is eroding. A greater
portion,of the income and sales taxes paid by City residents is being used to
balance the state budget. Less of this money is being returned to cities to
fund local services. Cities are being forced to rely upon an increased
property tax burden and a stagnant revenue base.
Richfield also remains heavily dependent upon state tax policy. Eighty-two
percent of the City's General Fund revenues are a combination of,state aids
and property taxes. Both of these sources are heavily controlled by the State
Legislature.
A greater dependence on property taxes requires a closer scrutiny of the
Richfield property tax base... Richfield's property tax base has always been .
primarily residential. Direction by the City Council in the past few years to
diversify the tax base by emphasizing on commercial development has proven
successful but the task remains to be completed. Furthermore, the overall
economic climate in the State of.Minnesota and in the metropolitan area plays
an important role in Richfield's opportunity for commercial growth. The
office/commercial segment of the real estate market in the Twin Cities
continues to remain in an overbuilt phase, making the task of attracting new
commercial growth to Richfield a difficult one.
Richfield also remains one of the communities in the metropolitan area most
heavily dependent upon the fiscal disparities program. The fiscal disparities
program is a ,mechanism for tax base sharing for new commercial/industrial
property development. Under the program, a certain percentage of new
commercial/industrial growth in the metropolitan area is contributed to a pool
and, subsequently,.redistributed to all cities in the seven county
metropolitan area based on a needs formula. Dependence on the fiscal
disparities program is evident in that approximately fifteen percent of
Richfields total assessed valuehas been contributed by the fiscal disparities
pool. There have been efforts initiated. to eliminate the fiscal disparities
program during.each of the past several years. While complete elimination of
the fiscal disparities program appears unlikely, some modifications are
possible. Those modifications would likely eliminate at least a portion of
the fiscal disparities contribution to Richfield. If the Fiscal Disparities
Program was eliminated completely the City's tax rate would have to be
adjusted upward by 15%, for an increase of $36 per year on an $85,000 •
residential property.
Richfield must continue to work on its two part-strategy:
*First, continue the tax base diversification to guard against significant
reductions in the property tax base including the fiscal disparities pool.
*Second, resist temptations to expand the city services. Reductions in state
and federal funding to counties and other not for profit organizations have
prompted many of these social service organizations to-request city '
assistance. In some cases, the requests have been to contribute to these
organizations to help support operating costs. Others have suggested that
the cities.undertake social service programs previously provided for by
other organizations or levels of government. Unfortunately, while there is
great sympathy for the need for these services, Richfield's tax base simply
cannot afford to support these efforts. Any effort to expand the type of
services provided by the city must be accompanied by commitments to reduce
service in other essential areas or on a user fee sustaining basis.
Richfield must continue to focus on its efforts to provide superior basic
services to our community on a cost efficient basis. That effort is reflected
within this budget through the use of a number of strategies.
*First, there is a continued need to determine that Richfield is providing
services as efficiently as possible. Richfield will continue to focus,
during the next year, on efforts to develop methods to measure efficiency as
well as to develop productivity improvement programs. One such measure of
productivity is the number of city employees to population served. A review
by our independent auditors reveals that the City of Richfield continues to
perform very well in this area. Therefore, while the city will work to
increase its efficiency to even higher standards, the reality is that this
will not be a panacea to resolving the financial challenges facing
Richfield. In order to balance this year's budget, a number of staff
positions will continue to be left unfilled. Special efforts have been made
to minimize the impact of these reduced staff levels on public services.
*Second, there is a need to more carefully focus.upon the types and levels of
service we are providing to our residents. An erosion of services, or
quality of services,.to our residents can have a negative impact upon the
community. However, there are ways to examine alternative service delivery
approaches which do not have the same impact. While there are no
significant changes in services suggested at this point, in the future there
will be an effort made to identify decision points for the City Council in
these areas.
*Third, careful attention must be provided for fees for services. Careful
attention to user fees-is important, especially in an economic climate where
state aids are continuously eroding, placing greater pressure upon the local
property tax base.
*Fourth, to the extent possible self supporting programs or activities must be
"spun off" into non general funds. Examples of this include transferring
the Swimming Pool and Ice Arena to the Recreation Fund. Also,'services
provided by general fund operations must, be sold to non general funds at
realistic costs. The non general funds can and should produce sufficient
revenues to support these services. Examples of this include the cost to
• provide police, accounting and management services to the Liquor and
Recreation Funds.
III
* Fifth, a special focus must be made on the area of redevelopment and tax
base expansion. To a great extent, our redevelopment efforts are limited by
market conditions, however, we must position ourselves so that we expect
appropriate new development when market conditions are favorable to this
critical task. Some achievements in this area include the completion of the
Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet (ILN) redevelopment plan and the Penn Avenue-
66th Street (PASSS) redevelopment plan. There is sustained continued
interest in both redevelopment areas at-this time.
GENERAL FUND
Revenues
The City's General Fund, which provides for most of the typical city services
residents have come to expect, receives its funding from a number of sources.
However, the two greatest sources of revenue to the General Fund are property
taxes and state aids which are listed as intergovernmental revenue. Other
sources, such as charges for services, fines and forfeitures, and licenses and
permits also contribute, but to a far less degree.
For the past several years, there has been a revenue shift by the State
Legislature toward significant reductions in state aids and greater reliance
upon local property taxes. Under this scenario, increased local property
taxes do not mean more services. Instead, property tax revenues are needed to
pay for existing services which were previously covered by state aids.
Naturally, the more dependent a city has been on state aids, the greater the
impact upon the tax base once the aids are reduced.
Richfield has been a recipient of substantial state aid payments for the past
several years. For example, in 1989 (see Chart 1) prior to the most recent
cuts in state aid, intergovernmental revenue represented 47.41% of revenues .
into the General Fund while property taxes accounted for 33.22%. For 1993,
the mix of revenue sources into the General Fund has changed dramatically.
Intergovernmental revenue in 1993 represents 44.81% while property taxes
comprise 40.86% (see Chart 2). The shift of state aids to property taxes from
1989 through 1993-reflects a growth in property taxes of over 7%, without
factoring in any needed additional revenue to support inflationary costs of
existing services.
ICENERAL FUND REVENUE -1
® Taxes
.2.SS% ® License 6
2.00% 2.25% Permits
9.S3X - ® Intr•govt
33.22% Revenue
¦ Charge
_ for
Service
QFines b
-
2.64% Forfeit
47.41% ® Misc.
Revenue
¦ Transfers
CHART 1
•
IV
ENERA FUND REVENUE 1993
JO Taxes
O License b
ll 1.85% 1.23% Permits
6.62'?74X 0 Intr•govt
Revenue
--- 40.86% ® Charges
For
service
-- []Fines &
Forfeit
44.81% =_ - ® Misc.
Revenue
- 2.88%
¦ Transfers
CHART 2
The total revenue of the General Fund budget for 1993 which is $11,884,300 is
a 2% decrease from the Adopted 1992 Budget of $12,131,950. This decrease is
comprised of two components, including a 4% decrease due to transferring the
ice arena and swimming pool operations to an enterprise fund, and a 2%
• increase due primarily to increases in intergovernmental revenues. The
revised 1992 revenue is $11,644,315 which represents a 4.0% decrease from the
Adopted 1992 Budget. This decrease is also due to the transfer of the ice
arena and swimming pool operations. Thus, excluding the ice arena and
swimming pool operations, the 1992 revised revenues represent a revenue base
equivalent to the 1992 Proposed Budget, and the .1993 proposed revenues
represent a revenue base which is 2% greater than the 1992 Proposed Budget.
For 1993, the city's net tax levy was increased by 3.84% over the prior year.
The increase is due largely to the city's obligation to pay for the City
portion of debt service on improvement bonds, mandatory contributions for
pension obligations and a reduced tax base due to property reevaluations in
1992. The effect of the 1993 city tax levy on an average $85,000 property in
Richfield also factoring in a level market value growth, is approximately
$19.50.
Expenditures
The City's General Fund is used to account for most of the city's general
government operations, such as police, fire, public works, parks, recreation,
elections and general administration. In fact, governments use the General
Fund to account for all resources not required to be accounted for in another
fund. '
Richfield's General Fund is organized into five major departments;"
Legislative/Executive, Administrative Services, Public .Safety, Community
Development and Community-Services. Each department, in turn, encompasses
. several divisions that provide an array of services, either directed to the
public or in support of other city services.
V
34.413
4.0
.83%
p Legje
® AdmSe r ® Pub Saf¦ ComDev® ComCHART 3
35.64%
2. 1'
.44%
Q Leg/Exec
® Admin
Serv
® Public
Safety
¦ Comm
DeveI
® Comm Serv
CHART 4
35.58%
1.91
.08%
p Leg/Exec
® Adm i n
Serv
® Public
Safety
¦ Comm
Deve I .
¦ Comm Serv
•
0
CHART 5
vi
5.90%
7.78%
5.22%
S7%
4.78%
60%
It is logical that over a period of years, the types and mix of city services
would likely change as the community changes. However, in a mature community
such as Richfield, it is also important that a consistent balance of services
be maintained even in the face of budgetary constraints. Richfield's mix of
services as seen through an expenditure analysis of the five major departments
reflects a stable, consistent approach. Compare the 1993 expenditure budget
with 1983 and 1988 (Charts 3, 4, and 5). They show, that while there have.
been minor adjustments, the balance of services provided by the five major
departments remains constant. The shift in 1993 reflects the transfer of the
ice arena and swimming pool operations from Community Services to an
enterprise fund. While some new programs have been added, others have been
eliminated or reduced.
Another way of reviewing expenditures is in terms of constant dollars.
Instead of only 'viewing expenditures from year to year in absolute terms, it
is important to view the expenditure growth in light of compounded annual
inflationary growth. Where a constant dollar examination of General Fund
expenditures is made (Chart 6), it becomes apparent that expenditures ofa
non-inflationary nature have been very flat for the past several years. In
terms of services, that means that relatively few new services have been added
while the city struggles to financially continue the same relative level of
services as in the past.
res in Constant Dollars
•
n
U
$14808008
$12000060
sleeeeeee
seeeeeee
sseeeeee
$4080088
$28eeeee
se
1987 1988 1969 1998 1991 1992R
Year
CHART 6
The Adopted 1992 Budget wasa balanced budget. The impact of the state sales
tax on the 1993 expenditures budget is estimated at $100,000. As of-June 1,
1992'the City was required to pay state sales tax on applicable goods and
services. This change necessitated program reductions and/or eliminations.
In making the reductions and adjustments necessary, the staff is presenting a
balanced budget both for 1992 Revised and 1993 Proposed Budgets (see Chart 1).
0 Expenditures
0 Expenditures/
conitent
0olers
VII
City staff reduced expenditure increases from all departments of the General
Fund in an effort to meet the fiscal shortfall. As a result, each department
was effected both for 1992 Revised and 1993 Proposed Budget cutbacks. The '
most significant budget issues for the 1992 Revised and 1993 Proposed General
Fund Budgets are summarized below:
CHART 7
1992 REVISED BUDGET •
* Legislative/Executive
General reductions in supplies, travel, conferences, schools and
professional services were made. *The most significant reduction was made in
legal fees paid for general counsel and prosecution. Cost savings were
achieved by assuming more work in house and less than expected litigation.
* Administrative Services
Recruitment procedure changes generated significant savings in the Personnel
Division, while general reductions in areas such as supplies contributed to
a status quo revised 1992 budget. The Tourism Administration budget was
moved from this department to the special revenue funds during 1992 which
shows as a $70,000 reduction.
* Community Development
The revised 1992 budget remained the same as adopted.
* Public-Safety
A community service officer position continues unfilled as do two police
officer positions. However, the hours of police service "on the street" has
not been reduced. In fact patrol hours are actually greater than in recent
'years. An unexpected loss of the radio console in Police Ancillary Service
of roughly $20,000 was included in the 1992 revised budget. However, the
funds for the replacement were transferred into the General Fund from the
Central Garage Fund which has a reserve for the replacement of radio •
equipment.
VIII
* Community Services
The revised 1992 budget includes the addition of one project clerical and
• one project administrative aide for work related to the construction of 77th
Street. Both positions, however, are to be reimbursed to the General Fund
from federal grant funds.
Also within the revised 1992 budget, the Ice Arena and.Swimming Pool
operations have been removed from the General Fund and included in a
Recreation Enterprise Fund.
The impact of the, 6 1/2% state sales tax upon municipal purchases mid year
1992 had'a significant impact on the department budget. Items such as
tennis court repair, asphalt repair of park paths and seal coating were all
items which were reduced to provide funding to pay the additional cost of
the sales tax.
In addition to the impact of sales tax on the Community Services Department,
each of.the other departments in the General Fund were also affected, though
to a far lesser extent. The cuts made in 1991 and early 1992 have continued
through to the Revised 1992 budget. Operating in an environment of constant
revenue short falls and aid reductions has instilled an instinctive approach
to further identifying areas and programs which may be modified to provide
savings. This phenomenon has greatly assisted the City's approach to meeting
a balanced revised 1992 budget.
1993 PROPOSED BUDGET
The 1993 proposed expenditure budget reflects only a two percent increase over
the,1992 Revised Budget. Thus, most of the cuts that were implemented mid-
year 1992 must be carried through 1993 to continue to meet the reduced funding
levels. In addition, more cuts are necessary to provided for normal pay
structure increases for current employees and labor contracts for 1993.
In addition to continuing the budget cuts already identified for 1992, further
cuts in part-time position hours for 1993 across a number of departments will
be implemented.
Another significant budget reduction that will continue for 1993 is the cut in
the seal coating program. This will be the third consecutive year that this
program has seen significant reductions, and must be funded in the future to
avoid more significant deterioration of city streets in the future. The
Council has directed staff to report on street maintenance funding
alternatives in 1993.
Perhaps the singular most significant item in the 1993 budget is the $100,000
general fund expenditure regarding sales tax payments to the State of
Minnesota. This single expenditure represents rougbly 35% of the entire tax
levy increase from 1992 to 1993.
While no new major programs are slated for elimination in 1993 over and above
those listed for the 1992 Revised Budget, it is clear that the City's General'
Fund will have an increasi.ngly difficult time meeting the service delivery
•
IX
levels that have been provided for in the past. In each area, eliminations in
non-essential items, such as elimination of all out of state travel for
conferences and schools,•and sharp reductions in supplies and service .
contracts has left the City with virtually no room'for further adjustments
other than major program elimination, should the legislature make additional
mid-year state aid cuts to cities in 1993. However, provided that such
unanticipated cuts do not occur, the Revised 1992 and Proposed 1993 Budgets
will leave the City in a position of achieving a balanced budget in both years
and will not require the City to deplete limited General Fund balance monies
to provide for current operations for 1992-1993
SPECIAL FUNDS
* Special Revenue Fund
The Special Revenue Fund is financed by earnings of the Enterprise Fund,
which is transferred to this account during the year. In 1992, $400,000
will be transferred to the fund from liquor store profits, and $5,000
interest is estimated. Funds will be used for capital improvement purposes,
as outlined in the Capital Improvements Budget.
* Contribution Funds
The Home Service Program, Community Center, Nature Center and Veterans
Memorial Park all receive contributions from a variety of sources throughout
the year. Funds will only be expended from these accounts if the
contributions are received.
* Community Development Block Grant
The Community Development Block Grant Fund is financed by grants •
administered by Hennepin County. The programs funded for 1993 are the
Greater Minneapolis Day Care Program, which provides a sliding fee subsidy
of childcare for Richfield residents when a family is not able to obtain
other funding. The Home Program provides maintenance services to low and
moderate income-elderly households. Beginning in 1992, this fund also
accounted for the purchase of homes with CDBG funds for the HRA New Home
Program. The total expenditure for these purposes is budgeted at $87,080.
* Drug Felony Forfeiture
Drug Felony Forfeiture receives its revenues as a result of cash and
property seized related to drug and/or felony criminal activity. The fund
carried forward a fund balance of approximately $118,000 and earned
approximately $10,000 in interest. For 1993, it is anticipated that $20,000
will be used for surveillance equipment and automated report processing
equipment.
* Cable TV
This fund will carry forward a balance of approximately $340,000. Revenues
of $100,750 in interest earnings and franchise fees of $100,000 will be
earned in 1993.' Total,expenditures of $85,500 are projected for a part-time
administrative assistant to assist in cable activities, payment of cable
.news broadcast capital outlay and related activities.
40
X
INTERNAL SERVICE° FUNDS
• * Central Garage Fund
It is expected that the fund will end the 1992 year with a cash balance of
approximately $1.7 million. These funds are used to purchase motor
vehicles, trucks and other large equipment which is then leased back to user
departments.
* Cental Services/Data Processing Fund
The.Central Services/Data Processing Fund provides printing, supplies and
copying services, and data processing equipment, services and support to
city staff. The Proposed 1993 Budget reflects an increase of approximately
$211,400 from the 1992 Budget. The increase is primarily due to an increase
in computer hardware and software to be purchased for the City's 5-year
information systems plan and new accounting system.
* Self-insurance Fund
The Self-insurance Fund remains strong. The 1993 Budget projects a fund
balance of $1.5 million at the end of 1993. In 1992, the fund incurred the
cost to replace damaged dispatch equipment, which was largely reimbursed by
property liability insurance. The fund also incurred significant costs
related to two workers' compensation claims, which were offset by a
reimbursement from the State Special Compensation Fund.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
• * Liquor Stores
The City of Richfield operates three municipal liquor stores. Total sales
for the liquor stores for 1992 is projected to increase to $6.69 million
and grow to $6.8 million in 1993. Expenditures budgeted for 1993 are
approximately 4% over the revised 1992 Budget. The increase is due to
increases in personnel costs and insurance premiums. Profits for 1993 are
expected to be $522,000 with a budgeted transfer to the Special Revenue
Fund of about $300,000. If additional profits are available, the council-
may elect to increase this transfer after audit results are complete.
* Sewer Utility Fund
The Sewer Utility Fund provides collection of sanitary wastewater from
approximately 11,500 accounts in the city. The 1993 expenditure budget is
approximately $1.8 million. The most significant expenditures for this
fund are the amounts paid to the Metropolitan Waste Control (MWC). Their
costs have increased by approximately 105% since 1985. Those amounts have
steadily increased over the past several years and now total $1.25 million
annually (see Chart 8). Sanitary sewer rates for 1993 will be increased by
16.8% to keep pace with the increase by MWC. Rates for the past several
years have not kept pace with rate increases by MWC and have eroded the
performance of the fund.
0
XI
$t?eeeee ,
$1288eee
$18eeeee
C
h $eeeeee
a
r
9 $688888
e
$188888
$288888
$e
1981 1962. 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 19,89 1998 1991 1992 1993
R*v Bud
Year
CHART 8
* Water Utility Fund
The Water Utility Fund reflects moderate growth during the year. Water
utility rates have been increased by 3%. No significant changes in
operations are noted. The 1993 Budget reflects the expansion of the
municipal water plant. The expansion will include the reconstruction of
the accelator, which performs the softening process, into two side by side
softening units. The 1993 cost of this project is budgeted at $3,000,000.
There are sufficient funds within the Water Utility Fund to accommodate
this improvement.
* Recreation Fund
The Recreation Fund, created in 1992, includes the Golf Course, Ice Arena,
Swimming Pool, and Miniature Golf operations. The construction of the new
Miniature Golf Course, funded by transfers from the Special Revenue-Cable
and PIR funds, is scheduled to be completed and open for business on May
31, 1993. Total revenues for the fund are estimated at $1.9 million in
1993. Gross Revenue Recreational Facilities Bonds issued to finance the
construction ofthe Golf Course were defeased in 1992 through a transfer
from the Special Revenue - Cable Fund. Estimated expenses for 1993 total
$1.7 million. Capital outlay is budgeted for the Golf Course to construct
a picnic/scoreboard, blacktop cart paths, equipment chemical storage, and
for fairway irrigation.
* Storm Sewer Utility Fund
The Storm Sewer Utility Fund provides a fee increase of roughly 4.9% which
is represented by a 35 cents per quarter.increase on residential property.
In 1993, $2,000,000 is budgeted for capital outlay. This work represents
storm sewer improvements for the 77th Street Project to provide an outlet
to and from Wood Lake.
0
0
XII
DEBT SERVICE FUND
The Debt Service Fund is used to record financial operations from special
assessments, tax increment, and as necessary, property taxes to meet debt
service payments and outstanding bond issues. Special assessment bonds are
payable through 2008. The fund balance in the special assessments is pledged
to pay 518,325,519 of bonds and interest still outstanding. Bonds.will be
paid from future assessments collected, interest income and property tax
levies in the future. For 1993, special assessment-funds are projected to
need $350,067 of property tax levy collection. The remaining $824,389 of tax
levy requirement will be cancelled for 1993.
The general obligation redevelopment bond is retired from tax increment
collected from the project area. The estimated fund balance for 1992-1993 is
sufficient to meet annual payments. Thus, the entire 1993 tax levy of
$655,500 will be cancelled.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET
The Capital Improvements Budget recommends $16,191,150 of expenditures. Of
this total, $9.8 million is related to 77th Street construction, and will be
funded primarily from state and federal grants. Also budgeted is $3,000,000
for the water plant accelator expansion previously described. The water
plant accelator expansion will be funded from user fees of the water plant.
The golf course improvements will also be funded from user fees. An
undesignated park improvement is also included with $300,000 of funding from
the Special Revenue Fund.
CONCLUSION
The City of Richfield continues to be a financially sound operation. The
projections for revenue in the future indicate a need in 1993 to continue to
focus on basic programs and services. During 1992, the City of Richfield
incurred the additional cost of state sales tax. The City was able to
accommodate this change by "belt-tightening" without a major impact on quality
or variety of services provided to residents.
City staff is prepared for the possibility that even further reductions could
occur in mid-year 1993. A response to any further cuts will be felt in
program reductions or elimination.
The information presented in this budget should provide a solid background for
a decision relating to the future direction of the City. My gratitude is
expressed to all those employees who worked very hard to prepare the budget,
and a special thanks to the finance division in completing the budget
document.
Respectfully submitted,
James D. Prosser
City Manager
XIII
0
0
0
TOTAL NUMBER OF FULL-TIME PERSONNEL
1989 - 1993
989 1990 1991 92 1993
GENERAL FUND
Legislative/Exective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Administrative Services 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
Public Safety 84.0 89.0 90.0 88.0 88.0
Community Development 10.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
Community Services** 55.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 53.0
Subtotal 166.0 175.0 176.0 174.0 171.0
INTERNAL SERVICES
Central Garage 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Data Processing 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Printing/Central Supply 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0
Subtotal 9.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Liquor 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0*
Sewer Utility 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Water Utility 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5
Golf Course** 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Recreation** 8.0
Subtotal 33.0 33.0 34.0 34.0 37.0
TOTAL 208.0 217.0 220.0 218.0 218.0
* The Penn Liquor Store clerk/cashier position will be eliminated upon the
retirement of the current employee.
** During 1992, the Ice Arena, Swimming Pool, and Golf Course operations were merged
into the Enterprise Funds - Recreation Fund. -
CnY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA 13 ANNUAL BUDGET
FUND DIVIS Liquor I Lquo R Stores I Lyndal a IA venue I A? O1N4814MBER
• TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES
NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES SALARY
CLASSIFICATIONS 1992 1993 GRADE
REVISED BUDGET
Regular Employees
Liquor Operations Director 1/3 1/3 M-4
Liquor Store Manager 1 1 M-1
Assistant Liquor Store Manager 1 1 GS-5E
Liquor Account Clerk 1/3 1/3 GS-3
Liquor Account Clerk -L 1/3 GS-3
Total 3 3
1992 1993
REVISED BUDGET
Capital Outlay
Refrigerator Cooler $3,000
Surveillance Camera and Equipment 5,600
Rug Shampoo Machine 200
Total $8,600 200
OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA E-8
FUND Liquor I L quoARStores ( Penn IAvSION enue I ACCOU01-48346ER
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES AND CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES
NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES SALARY
CLASSIFICATIONS 1992 1993 GRADE
REVISED BUDGET
Regular Employees
Liquor Operations Director
Liquor Store Manager
Assistant Liquor Store Manager
Liquor Account Clerk
Liquor Account Clerk
Liquor C1erK/Cashier
Total
1/3 1/3 M-4
1 1 M-1
1 1 GS-5E
1/3 1/3 GS-3
1/3 1/3 GS-3
1 I- GS-2
4 4
is
REVISED
Capital Outlay
Surveillance Camera and Equipment
Refrigerator Merchandiser
Total
55,600.
$3,000
$5,600 $3,000
MINNESOTA E-14 ANNUAL BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO.XXXX
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR-THE YEAR 1993
AND LEVYING TAXES
BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Richfield as follows:
1. The budget for the City of Richfield for the year-1993
is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for
each of the departments to be as follows:
GENERAL FUND
0
Legislative
Executive
Administrative,Services
Community Development
Public Safety
Community Services
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
176,250
400,650
851,570
241,760
6,297,880
3,916.190
$11,884,300
2. The estimated gross revenue of the City of Richfield from
all sources, including general ad valorem tax levies as
hereinafter set forth for the year 1993, which are more
fully detailed in the City Manager's official copy of the
budget, are hereby found and determined to be as follows:
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
511.884.300
3. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the
City of Richfield a direct ad valorem tax in the year
1992, payable in 1993 for the following purposes and in
the following amounts:
PURPOSE
GENERAL FUND*
AMOUNT
$7,122,366
*Provision has been made in the General Fund.for the payment
of the City's contributory share to Public Employees'
Retirement Association and Fireman's Relief Associations.
Provision has also been made in the General Fund revenues for a
general levy that includes a debt service levying in the amount
of $350,067 for Bonds of 1972, 1977, 1978, 1983,and 1985. See
separate resolutions on other bond issues.
40
R-1
4. The budget for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Richfield for the year 1993 is hereby ratified and approved. There .
is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of Richfield a
direct ad valorem tax in the year 1992, payable in 1993 for the
following purposes:
PURPOSE AMOUNT
Housing and Redevelopment Authority $150,987
Relocation Information, Services and
Assistance $ 14,983
5. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted
to the County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Krisch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF
1992 BUDGET OF VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 7804 appropriated funds for person
services, other.-expenses.and capital outlays for each department of
the city for the year of 1992: and
WHEREAS, The City Charter, Chapter 7, Section 7.09, gives the
Council authority to transfer unencumbered appropriation balances
from one office, department, or agency to another within the same
fund at the request of the City Manager: and
WHEREAS, The City Manager had requested a revision of the 1992
budget appropriations in accordance with Charter provisions and as
detailed in the proposed 1993 budget document.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the 1992 apropriations for each department of the
general Fund be amended to establish the following totals:
GENERAL FUND
Legislative 169,710
Executive 492,650
• Administrative Services 850,200
Community Development 233,450
Public Safety 6,065,830
Community Services 3.832,475
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $11.644.315
DECREASE $ 486,
2. Estimated 1992 gross revenue of the City of Richfield from
all sources, as the same are more fully detailed in the City
Managers's official copy of the proposed 1993 budget, and are
hereby revised as follows:
DECREASE
$ 487,635
3. That the City Manager and the Finance Manager bring into
effect the provisions of this resolution.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota., this
9th day of December., 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
R-2
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM
TAX LEVIES ON IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1973
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4990 provided for the sale of
$6,300,000 Improvement Bonds of 1973 and provided for taxes to be
levied for the payment of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce ad valorem
tax levies to be levied for 1993 due to the extent that such
reduction is possible by reason of substantial prepayment of
special assessments and the investment return on these funds, and
WHEREAS, There is presently funds available in the
Improvements Bonds of 1973 Fund to pay current principal and
interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5
percent excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the amount levied in 1992, collectible in 1993,
on Resolution No. 4990 in the amount of $86,689 is
hereby canceled.
• 2. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. xxxx
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION:OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM
TAX LEVIES ON REDEVELOPMENT BONDS OF 1977
WHEREAS, Resolution No. =5752 provided for the sale .-of
$4,700,000 Redevelopment Bonds of 1977-and provided for taxes to
be levied for the payment of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce certain ad
valorem tax levies to be levied for 1993, due to funds on hand
from tax increments and the investment from the Project Area
exceed the amount necessary to pay principal and interest on such
bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5
percent excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the amount levied in 1992, collectible in 1993,
on Resolution.No. 5752 in the amount of $497,200 is
hereby canceled.
2. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
0
R-4
RESOLUTION NO. xxxx
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REDUCTION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM
TAX LEVIES ON REFUNDING BONDS OF 1978
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5836 provided for the sale of
$6,500,000 Refunding Bonds of 1978 and provided for taxes to be
levied for the payment of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5852 certified an ad valorem tax
levy for 1992 of $301,200 for payment of principal and interest
on the Refunding Bonds of 1978, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce certain ad
valorem tax levies to be levied for 1993, due to the extent that
such reduction is possible by reason of substantial prepayment of
special assessments and the investment return on these funds, and
WHEREAS, There is presently partial funds available in the
Refunding Bonds of 1978 Fund to pay current principal and
interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5
percent excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the amount levied in 1992, collectible in 1993,
on Resolution No. 5852 in the amount of $240,500 is
hereby canceled.
2. That the amount of $60,700 is levied in 1992 for
collection in 1993.
3. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
•
R-5
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN AD VALOREM
TAX LEVIES ON THE IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1980
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 6310 provided for the sale of
$6,100,000 Improvement'Bonds of 1980 and provided for taxes to be
levied for the payment of principal and interest thereon, and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 6310 certified an ad valorem tax
levy for 1993 of $655,500 for payment of principal and interest
on the Improvement Bonds of 1980, and
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to cancel or reduce certain ad
valorem tax levies to be levied for 1993, due to the extent that
such reduction is possible by reason of substantial prepayment of
special assessments and the investment return on these funds, and
WHEREAS, There is presently funds available in the
improvement Bonds of 1980 Fund to pay current principal and
interest on such bonds, and
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5
percent excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
f 1. That the amount levied in 1992, collectible in 1993,
on Resolution No. 6310 in the amount of $655,500 is
hereby canceled.
2. That a copy of this resolution shall be sent to the
Hennepin County Auditor.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber .City Clerk
•
R-6
t
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE DISCONTINUATION OF
THE IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1967 DEBT SERVICE FUND
AND TRANSFER OF SURPLUS
WHEREAS, On November 1, 1967, the city issued Special Assessment
Improvement Bonds in the amount of $375,000; and
WHEREAS, Final payment for principal and interest maturities was
made on February 1, 1988, and
and
WHEREAS, All delinquent special assessments have been collected,
WHEREAS, It appears desirable to discontinue this fund.
WHEREAS, The ad valorem tax levy requirement includes a 5 percent
excess provision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
1. The approximate cash surplus of $335,000 in the Improvement
Bonds of 1967 be transferred; $150,000 to the General Fund
to reimburse the HRA for airport expenditures and $185,000
to the Improvement Bonds of 1965 Debt Service Fund to
• provide for future debt service.
2. The improvement Bonds of 1967 Fund be discontinued as of
December 31, 1992.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
0
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1993 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
WHEREAS, a proposed Capital Improvement Budget for 1993 has been
prepared and submitted for review by the City Council in accordance with
charter requirements, and
WHEREAS, the city council has received the recommendations and benefit
of review of these proposed documents by the Planning Commission and has it-
self reviewed these proposals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1993 Capital Improvement
Budget in the sum total of $16,191,150 is hereby approved and adopted with
full recognition of the fact that the cost estimates are approximate and are
subject to final cost estimates and that all awards of contracts for these
projects are subject to necessary hearings and must be approved by the City
Council in accordance with established laws and practices governing such
action, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to initiate the procedures which will lead to more formal and
detailed consideration of these projects in accordance with the aforementioned
laws and practices.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 9th day
of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
•
R-7
• RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1994-1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROGRAM
WHEREAS, a proposed Capital Improvement Program for 1994-1998 has been
prepared for review by the Planning Commission in accordance with charter
requirements, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendations and benefit
of review of these proposed documents by the Planni-ng Commission and has it-
self reviewed these proposals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 1994-1998 Capital Improvement
Program is hereby approved and adopted subject to annual review and revision.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to initiate the procedures which will lead to more formal and detail-
ed consideration of these projects in accordance with the aforementioned laws
and practices.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 9th day
of December, 1992.
is
ATTEST:
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
R-8
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
i
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY
i SEWER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES,
• . WATER RATES AND CHARGES,
SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES,
STORM SEWER RATES AND CHARGES
AND 5% PENALTY ON PAST DUE ACCOUNT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1993
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.05 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
use and service of the sanitary sewer system are hereby established
to be those set forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution
which rescinds Resolution No. 7840:
2. Where the rate is not based upon the metered use of water,
the following quarterly flat charges are established effective
Janaury 1, 1993 for each billing district as defined in paragraph 3
of this resolution.
1993
A) Residential per unit $ 23.80
B) Commercial
For the equivalent of 10 or less persons $ 23.80
More than 10, less than 16 59.80
More than 15, less than 21 89.50
More than 20, less than 26 119.60
C) Institutional -
.For each public or private school the quarterly flat
charge shall be charged whether the school is in session
session or not (rates being charged upon average yearly
use); shall be based upon the number of students enrolled
at the beginning of the quarterly billing period or.the
preceding period if school is not then in session; and'
shall be as follows:
1993
For each 100 grade school students or
fraction in excess thereof $ 43.10
For each 100 junior high school students or
high school students or fraction there of 119.60
D) In addition to the above flat rates there shall be a
customer charge on each invoice as determined in
paragraph 4 of this resolution and a certifictation
charge as determined in Section 7.05 of the City
Ordinance Code.
E
3. Where the rate for sanitary sewer service is based upon
the metered use of water on the premises, such rates shall be as
follows: •
A) For all residential premises the rate shall be based on
the actual use, or less of water for the preceding
winter quarter, per thousand gallons with minimum of
7,000 gallons, effective January 1, 1993, for each cus-
tomer billing district and shall be as follow:
1993
$1.25
For the purpose of this paragraph A, the winter quarter
shall be the winter quarter specified in Subdivision 3
of said Section 7.05.
B) For all commercial, institutional, industrial, and
other premises, the rate per thousand gallons of water
effective January 1, 1993 shall be as follows:
1993
$1.25
C) A customer charge shall be made for each invoice
rendered effective January 1, 1993, as follows:
1993
$3.00
If the invoice is for water service, as well as
sanitary sewer service, the customer charge, when
collected, shall be allocated proportionally between
the City's water fund, sewer fund and its storm sewer •
fund based on the user fees billed for by each fund.
D) Where the metered use of water on the premises for the
preceding winter quarter was not normal, the rate may
be adjusted as provided in Subdivision 3 of said Sec-
tion 7.05.
4. The foregoing rates and charges are in addition to, and
not in lieu of, other rates and charges established by ordinance or
resolution.
WATER RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1993
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
city water and water service are hereby established to be those set
forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The charge due and payable to the City by each water
customer of the City, during any quarter shall be $1.30 per 1,000
gallons. Water charges shall be payable quarterly, and all bills
issued after January 1, 1993, shall be at this rate. These charges
will cover,.. in some instances, water used during the months of
October, November and December, 1992.
0
SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES FOR 1993
?y
• 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 of the
ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
.special customer services are hereby established to be those set
forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The charge for establishing a new customer account shall
be $13.50 per account.
. 3. The charge for installation of meters or outside meter
readers shall be $19.00 per installation.
4. The charge to flush and maintain fire hydrants located on
privately owned property within the City shall be $39.00 per hydrant
per year plus any required parts.
5. The charge to thaw and service water pipes on customer
property shall be actual cost to the City plus thirty percent.
6. The charge for any other services not covered by the above
shall be based on actual hourly cost to the City plus thirty
percent.
STORM SEWER RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1993
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.20 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
16 city storm sewer service are hereby established to be those set
forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The rates and charges for the use and availabilty of the
system are determined through the use of a "Residential Equivalent
Factor" (REF). - One REF is defined as the ratio of the average
volume of surface runoff coming from one acre of land and subjected
to a particular use, to the average volume of runoff coming from one
acre of land subjected to typical single-family residential use
within the city during a standard one year rainfall event. The
REF's for the following land uses within the city and the billing
classifications for such land uses are as follows:
LAND USES
Cemeteries
Parks and Railroads
Two-family residential
Single-family residential
Public and private schools and
institutional uses
Multiple-family residential
uses and churches
Commercial, industrial and
warehouse uses
REF CLASSFICATION
.25 1
.75 2
1.00 3
1.00 4
1.25 5
3.00 6
5.00 7
0
3. The basic system quarterly rate for storm sewer service is
$37.75 per acre of land. $7.55 is the quarterly rate for a single
family residence which is considered to have an acreage of one-fifth •
acre. The charge made against each parcel of land is then
determined by multiplying the REF for the parcel's land use
classification times the parcel's acreage times the basic system
rate.
5% PENALTY OF PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
1. Customers will have thirty (30) days to pay their water,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer quarterly bills from the date of
mailing by the City. Any unpaid amount will be added to the next
quarterly bill along with a 5% penalty on the delinquent amount.
2. The penalty charge when billed on past due accounts shall
be allocated proportionally between the City's water fund,- sewer
fund and its storm sewer fund based on the user fees billed for each
fund.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CITY'S CONTRIBUTION
TOWARD HEALTH, TERM LIFE AND DENTAL INSURANCE
PREMIUM FOR MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the hospital-medical/surgical group health
insurance plan is available from the LOGIS Health Insurance
Program for City employees and their families; and
WHEREAS, a term life and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance plan is available from the Local Government Information
Systems Association (LOGIS) for City employees; and
WHEREAS, a self-funded group dental insurance plan is
available to City Management and General Services employees and
their families; and
WHEREAS, a group short-term and long-term disability program
is available to City Management and General Services employees;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council is required to determine by
resolution the City's contribution toward the premium for
employee group insurance coverages.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that for December 1992, the
City shall contribute a maximum of $260.00 toward an employee
health insurance premium for all eligible non-unionized employees
and commencing January 1, 1993, the City shall contribute a
maximum of $285.00 per month, and in any event, said
contributions shall not exceed the cost of single coverage for
employees selecting that option. The City shall also pay the
$22.00 monthly premium for the employee dental insurance plan and
the $2.55 monthly premium for the term life and accidental death
and dismemberment insurance plan for City employees for a total
possible maximum 1993 insurance premium contribution-of $309.55
per month. Such contributions shall be for coverage effective
January 1, 1993.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall contribute the
full cost of long-term disability insurance for the Management
and General Services employees' coverage. Such contribution will
be recommended separately after long-term disability proposals
have been reviewed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council shall determine
the City's contribution toward insurance premiums for all
organized employee groups by the adoption of the appropriate
resolutions concerning labor contracts with the respective
organized employee groups.
•
J
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this 9th day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE DECEMBER 1992
GENERAL SERVICES SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City 'of Richfield provides for the
adoption of a pay plan for General Services employees from time-to-time,
and
WHEREAS, the City is to prepare a Comparable Worth Analysis at the end
of selected calendar years, and
WHEREAS, the General Services pay plan contains female-dominated
classes comparable to the male-dominated, contracted labor units, and
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a pay plan for the last
payroll period in 1992 for position classifications for the General
Services employees, designed to provide greater salary range equity between
the female-dominated and male-dominated employees, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby
does establish for the last payroll period in 1992 the following pay plan,
which is to be effective December 27, 1992, and subject to all applicable
provisions of the City Code:
GENERAL SERVICES COMPENSATION PLAN
Step 1 2 3 4 MERIT RANGE
Range
GS1 YR 17,825.60 18,699.20 19,676.80 20,654.40 22,776.00
MO 1,485.47 1,558.27 1,639.73 1,721.20 1,898.00
BW 685.60 719.20 756.80 794.40 876.00
HR 8.57 8.99 9.46 9.93 10.95
GS2 YR 19,676.80 20,654.40 21,673.60 22,776.00 25,126.40
M0 1,639.73 1,721.20 1,806.13 1,898.00 2,093.87
BW 756.80 794.40 833.60 876.00 966.40
HR 9.46 9.93 10.42 10.95 12.08
GS3 YR 21,673.60 22,776.00 23,940.80 25,126.40 27,747.20
MO 1,806.13 1,898.00 1,995.07 2,093.87 2,312.27
BW 833.60 876.00 920.80 966.40 1,067.20
HR 10.42 10.95 11.51 12.08 13.34
GS4 YR 23,940.80 25,126.40 26,416.00 27,747.20 30,638.40
MO 1,995.07 2,093.87 2,.201.33 2,312.27 2,553.20
BW 920.80 966.40 1,016.00 1,067.20 1,178.40
HR 11.51 12.08 12.70 13.34 14.73
GS4E YR 25,729.60 27,019.20 28,392.00 29,827.20 32,926.40
MO 2,144.13 2,251.60 2,366.00 2,485.60 2,743.87
BW 989.60 1,039.20 1,'092.00 1,147.20 1,266.40
HR 12.37 12.99 13.65 14.34 15.83
GS5 YR 26,416.00 27,747.20 29,120.00 30,638.40 33,779.20
16 MO 2,201.33 2,312.27 2,426.67 2,553.20 2,814.93
BW 1,016.00 1,067.20 1,120.00 1,178.40 1,299.20
HR 12.70 13.34 14.00 14.73 16.24
GSSE YR 28,392.00 29,827.20 31,304.00 32,926.40 36,316.80
MO 2,366.00 2,485.60 2,608.67 2,743.87 3,026.40
BW 1,092.00 1,147.20 1,204.00 1,266.40 1,396.80
HR 13.65 14.34 15.05 15.83 17.46
GS6 YR
MO 29,120.00
2,426.67 30,638.40
2,553.20 32,198.40
2,683.20 33,779.20
2,814.93 39,166.40
3,263.87
BW 1,120.00 1,178.40 1,238.40 1,299.20 1,506.40
HR 14.00 14.73 15.48 16.24 18.83
GS6E YR 31,304.00 32,926.40 34,590.40 36,316.80 42,099.20
MO 2,608.67 2,743.87 2,882.53 3,026.40 3,508.27
BW 1,204.00 1,266.40 1,330.40 1,396.80 1,619.20
HR 15.05 15.83 16.63 17.46 20.24
Normal Proaression Throuah General Services Compensation Plan
a. Step 1 - Start
b. Step 2 - One year from anniversary date
c. Step 3 - One year since last increase
If an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee
may not advance to Step 3 until performance is rated
Satisfactory or higher.
d. Step 4 - One year since last increase
If an employee is rated Needs Improvement, the employee
may not advance to Step 4 until performance is rated
Satisfactory or higher.
e. Merit Range - One year since last increase for those rated Above
Satisfactory or Outstanding. Satisfactory and Needs.Improvement
performers may not advance to or within the Merit Range. Salary
increases in the Merit Range will be determined by the supervisor
and may range between 2% - 5%.
An employee within the Merit Range who is performing at least at an
Above Satisfactory level will receive a percentage salary adjustment
equal to the percentage of the overall range adjustment. An employee
within the Merit Range who is performing at a Satisfactory level will
receive a percentage salary increase equal to one-half (h) of the
overall.percentage adjustment.
An employee within the Merit Range who is performing at a Needs
Improvement level will not receive a salary adjustment, provided
however, that such employee's salary would not remain at an amount
less than the new rate for Step 4 of such employee's current salary
grade.
f. Employees whose competency level and/or performance are.rated
Unsatisfactory may not advance to the next step until their
performance improves.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,,Minnesota this
day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City.Clerk
GENERAL SERVICES POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
GRADE POSITION TITLES CLASS
1 Clerk Typist Non-Exempt
Data Entry Operator
Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Switchboard-Receptionist Non-Exempt
2 Community Development Technician Non-Exempt
Community Service Officer Non-Exempt
Custodian Non-Exempt
Lead Liquor Clerk Non-Exempt
Licensing Clerk Non-Exempt
Liquor Clerk/Cashier Non-Exempt
Senior Clerk Typist Non-Exempt
Transportation Specialist Non-Exempt
3 Accounting Clerk Non-Exempt
Accounting Technician Non-Exempt
Accounts Payable Clerk Non-Exempt
Code Compliance Officer Non-Exempt
Dispatcher Non-Exempt
Health/Licensing Specialist Non-Exempt
Leased Housing Assistant Non-Exempt
Liquor Account Clerk Non-Exempt
Secretary Non-Exempt
Utility Billing Clerk Non-Exempt
Arena Operations Assistant Non-Exempt
4 Assessment Clerk Non-Exempt
06 Assistant Turf Supervisor Non-Exempt
Central Services Technician Non-Exempt
Data Processing Technician Non-Exempt
Engineering Technician Non-Exempt
Social Services Supervisor Non-Exempt
Solid Waste/Environmental Specialist Non-Exempt
4E Administrative Aide Exempt
Associate Planner Exempt
Media Assistant Exempt
Payroll Accountant Exempt
Project Assistant Exempt
Zoning Administrator Exempt
5 Assistant Building Superintendent Non-Exempt
Housing Inspector Non-Exempt
5E Administrative Assistant Exempt
Assistant Golf Course Manager Exempt
Assistant Liquor Store Manager Exempt
Community Center Programmer Exempt
Community Development Assistant Exempt.
Leased Housing Specialist Exempt
Motor Vehicle Licensing Supervisor Exempt
Naturalist Exempt
Planning and Research Specialist Exempt
Recreation Supervisor Exempt
Redevelopment Specialist
Rehabilitation Specialist
Youth Resource Specialist
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
6 Electrical/Building Inspector Non-Exempt
Programmer/Analyst Non-Exempt
Senior Housing Inspector Non-Exempt
6E
Accountant
Housing Supervisor
Administrative Assistant
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
(Rev. 12-92)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE DECEMBER 1992
MANAGEMENT SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides for the
adoption of a pay plan for Management employees from time-to-time, and
WHEREAS, the City is to prepare a Comparable Worth Analysis at the end
of selected calendar years, and
WHEREAS, the Management pay plan contains female-dominated classes
comparable to the male-dominated, contracted labor units, and
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a pay plan for the last
payroll period in 1992 for position classifications for the Management
employees, designed to provide greater salary range equity between the
female-dominated and male-dominated employees, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby
does establish for the last payroll period in 1992 the following pay plan,
which is to be effective December 27, 1992, and subject to all applicable
provisions of the City Code:
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PLAN
PAY GRADE MINIMUM MID-RANGE MAXIMUM
• M-NE YR 28,974.40 34,673.60 40,560.00
MO 2,414.53 2,889.47 3,380.00
BW 1,114.40 1,333.60 1,560.00
HR 13.93 16.67 19.50
M-1 YR 31,304.00 37,460.80 43,804.80
MO 2,608.67 3,121.73 3,650.40
BW 1,204.00 1,440.80 1,684.80
HR 15.05 18.01 21.06
M-2 YR 35,360.00 42,307.20 49,524.80
MO 2,946.67 3,525.60 4,127.07
BW 1,360.00. 1,627.20 1,904.80
HR 17.00 20.34 23.81
M-3 YR 40,352.00 48,256.00 56,596.80
MO 3,362.67 4,021.33 4,716.40
BW 1,552.00 1,856.00 2,176.80
HR 19.40 23.20 27.21
M-4 YR 44,948.80 53,768.00 62,920.00
MO 3,745.73 4,480.67 5,243.33
BW 1,728.80 2,068.00 2,420.00
HR '21.61 25.85 30.25
M-5 YR
MO 52,145.60
4,345.47 62,379.20
5,198.27 72,987.20
6,082.27
BW 2,005.60 2,399.20 2,807.20
HR 25.07 29.99 35.09
? ? o
rn z
•rl O M
4-) G4 N
?G Q O O O ON
Sa 4 +-) 4-) ON
z
O ? ?
G p ? ? O
E
0 E 010 + O t
0
O O O .
4-) N a a - a a
0 04 44 44
w o 0 o
ED 0) 0) 0)
w- dA O O >4
°) a a a b
mro
b
ro
a dip 010 da
U
A .H 9 z O O •n O 4-)
H 4-) d-) b
r-i4-) 3 QA O O O O
H
E O M Q E O
° ? + + a
0
0 w to
a ° a
E10s zLo a
3: a)
H
O 0) r=
.0 E 0 t
tM
-1
W
w
ro • m a a 0 4
3 0 a
P4 O 0
.,i
• 0
i o LO W
•,? 44 O
a
p E•4 O O o 4-)
M (a r. ?
a
?
>
to a 0 (1)
r? Q ri ri O .O
f-I + + +
? O w
to
3
0
a °
r
.1 Lf) n
•
•n
•n
? N Olt Q 4 Q ?
• 4-I •
A ) 0) 0
) ri
O.E )
1 )
1 dP • 0
4J 4-) z r. O G 0
0 a ( °
.moo z
m •? >1
U
0f(a0 >r
U)
° $4 4J
+>
N O N
. ?
O
> >
a
w C:
44
>1
>
?
A
w O N w o
°
z -ri ? +> a (a b
0 -
a) 9H ( W " co u
(1)
*4 • i
co
X00 as +) o d
a n z
gab a 4l c
(a I
En?ON
h
I
•
x
O
U
U
O
n
., a
N M
E-4 0
a I?
/ RANGE
M-NE
MANAGEMENT POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
POSITION
Foreman/Supervisor
Shop Foreman
Turf Supervisor
M-1 City Clerk
Community Center Manager
Golf Course Manager
Health Administrator
Ice Arena Manager
Liquor Store Manager
Nature Center Manager
Recreation Manager
M-2 Asst. Fire Chief/Fire Marshall
Building Superintendent
Chief Building Official
City Planner
Data Processing Manager
Engineering Supervisor
Maintenance Superintendent
Transportation Engineer
Utility Superintendent
M-3 City Engineer
Finance Manager
Fire Chief
Housing & Redevelopment Coordinator
Leisure Services Coordinator
Operations Coordinator
Personnel Manager
M-4 Liquor Operations Director
M-5
Department Director
CLASS
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
(Rev. 12-92)
•
0
RESOLUTION ND.
WHEREAS,
adoption of a
and
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 GENERAL SERVICES
SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
the municipal code of the City'of Richfield provides for the
pay plan for General Services employees from time-to-time,
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 1993 pay plan for
position classifications for General Services employees. The City Manager
is authorized to add or reclassify positions as necessary. Examples of
positions in each pay grade are attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby
does establish for the year 1993 the following pay plan, which is to be
effective January 1, 1993, and subject to all applicable provisions of the
City Code:
GENERAL SERVICES COMPENSATION PLAN
Step 1 2 3 4 _ MERIT RANGE
Range
GS1 YR 18,366.40 19,260.80 20,259.20 21,278.40 23,462.40
MO 1,530.53 1,605.07 1,688.27 1,773.20 1,955.20
BW 706.40 740.80 779.20 818.40 902.40
HR 8.83 9.26 9.74 10.23 11.28
GS2 YR. 20,259.20 21,278.40 22,318.40 23,462.40 25,875.20
MO 1,688.27 1,773.20 1,859.87 1,955.20 2,156.27
BW 779.20 818.40 858.40 902.40 995.20
HR 9.74 10.23 10.73 11.28 12.44
GS3 YR 22,318.40 23,462.40 24,668.80 25,875.20 28,579.20
MO 1,859.87 ,1,955.20 2,055.73 2,156.27 2,381.60
BW 858.40 902.40 948.80 995.20 1,099.20
HR 10.73 11.28 11.86 12.44 13.74
GS4 YR 24,668.80 25,875.20 27,206.40 28,579.20 31,553.60
MO 2,055.73 2,156.27 2,267.20 2,381.60 2,629.47
BW 948.80 995.20 1,046.40 1,099.20 1,213.60
HR 11.86 12.44 13.08 13.74 15.17
GS4E YR 26,499.20 27,830.40 29,244.80 30,721.60 33,904.00
MO 2,208.27 2,319.20 2,437.07 2,560.13 2,825.33
BW 1,019.20 1,070.40 1,124.80 1,181.60 1,304.00
HR 12.74 13.38 14.06 14.77 16.30
GS5 YR 27,206.40 28,579.20 29,993.60 31,553.60 34,798.40
MO 2,267.20 2,381.60 2,499.47 2,629.47 2,899.87
BW 1,046.40 1,099.20 ' 1,153.60 1,213.60 1,338.40
HR 13.08 13.74 14.42 15.17 16.73
GS5E YR 29,244.80 30,721.60 32,240.00 33,904.00 37,398.40
MO 2,437.07 2,560.13 2,686.67 2,825.33 3,116.53
BW 1,124.80 1,181.60 1,240.00 1,304.00 1,438.40.
HR 14.06 14.77 15.50 16.30 17.98
6
6E
Redevelopment Specialist
Rehabilitation Specialist
Youth Resource Specialist
Electrical/Building Inspector
Programmer/Analyst
Senior Housing Inspector
Accountant
Housing Supervisor
Administrative Assistant
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Non-Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
Exempt
(Rev. 10-92)
01
?i
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 MANAGEMENT
SALARY COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the municipal code of the City of Richfield provides for the
adoption of a pay plan for Management employees from time-to-time, and
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 1993 pay plan for
position classifications for Management employees. The City Manager is
authorized to add or reclassify positions as necessary. Examples of
positions in each pay grade are attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and hereby
does establish for the year 1993 the following pay plan, which is to be
effective January 1, 1993, and subject to all applicable provisions of the
City Code:
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION PLAN
PAY GRADE MINIMUM MID-RANGE MAXIMUM
M-NE YR 29,848.00 35,713.60 41,787.20
MO 2,487.33 2,976.13 3,482.27
. BW 1,148.00 1,373.60 1,607.20
HR 14.35 17.17 20.09
M-1 YR 32,240.00 38,584.00 45,115.20
MO 2,686.67 3,215.33 3,759.60
BW 1,240.00 1,484.00 1,735.20
HR 15.50 18.55 21.69
M-2 YR 36,420.80 43,576.00 51,001.60
MO 3,035.07 3,631.33 4,250.13
BW 1,400.80 1,676.00 1,961.60
HR 17.51 20.95 24.52
M-3 YR 41,558.40 49,712.00 58,302.40
MO 3,463.20 4,142.67 4,858.53
BW 1,598.40 1,912.00 2,242.40
HR 19.98 23.90 28.03
M-4 YR 46,300.80 55,390.40 64,812.80
MO 3,858.40 4,615.87 5,401.07
BW 1,780.80 2,130.40 2,492.80
HR 22.26 26.63 31.16
M-5 YR 53,705.60 64,251.20 75,171.20
MO 4,475.47 5,354.27 6,264.27
BW 2,065.60 2,471.20 2,891.20
HR 25.82 30.89 36.14
EA 010 dp 010
rn z In In O
•,i O H r -I M N
4-) a4 ON
O
{
.I HH 4-) 4-) 4.) r-1
S
o a a)
O E 010 + a) 1 I E
a) O O O U
> 44 a A
V b b
w Q Q Q
v a W 44
O ? O b O
w N ) m
4.1- O 010 O O ?r
°? a a a
ro ca b
b•?
b
L
E> ° LO
• N
b N z M r1 r-I •rl
r. 0 E-4
H O O
r
-I ? 3 Q A O a)
(C O a H H b1
U? O
64 0-4 + + I t°.
° o U) r.
r. 0) w z aa
)
V.
H 44 r.1 >
r-( •r-I Q1 dP b 'C3 O rd O
Q a a
-i r. 4-) O 0 o10 b
3 I 0 rn ? a
a 4 E-4 i 0)
41
a) H U')
(o
(a
(a
w
)b•
a ED m (1)
? 3 O a tz AG ? U
fd
U •'i •d 010 010 010
O co r-I
In
O
LO
° 44
.H. ? o
a
E-4 o O o
H +? +? +? U
r II N •n
(a (a a `? o a
ro rv
f-I A M '?
ri r-4 a) O +)
-rq w r. 44
a o
> ro rn b ro b
•ri o U) a a a w w -H
0 b rn O 0
H a) .0 Q 7 ) o10 •
ra
B O O U
IC ? (
C I
C O
ro x a a z
?
41 >1
.,,
0 (a 0 >4
o c
? 4 rv
z C: N 4 H
rj U)
a) ?I
H
(a
4
•
U)
a
ak ? o ? Q)
wou a
a E z a
? ab a o n
(CEO
U1 a) ( C
h
E-4
W
w
E
H
Q
G
0
a)
A
)-I
a)
W
c
co
MANAGEMENT POSITION CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE
RANGE POSITION CLASS
M-NE Foreman/Supervisor Non-Exempt
Shop Foreman Non-Exempt
Turf Supervisor Non-Exempt
M-1 City Clerk Exempt
Community Center Manager Exempt
Golf Course Manager Exempt
Health Administrator Exempt
Ice Arena Manager Exempt
Liquor Store Manager Exempt
Nature Center Manager Exempt
Recreation Manager Exempt
M-2 Asst. Fire Chief/Fire Marshall Exempt
Building Superintendent Exempt
Chief Building Official Exempt
City Planner Exempt
Data Processing Manager Exempt
Engineering Supervisor Exempt
Maintenance Superintendent Exempt
Transportation Engineer Exempt
Utility Superintendent Exempt
• M-3 City Engineer Exempt
Finance Manager Exempt
Fire Chief Exempt
Housing & Redevelopment Coordinator Exempt
Leisure Services Coordinator Exempt
Operations Coordinator Exempt
Personnel Manager Exempt
M-4 Liquor Operations Director Exempt
M-5 Department Director Exempt
(Rev. 12-92)
C,
•
•
0
a
RESOLUTION NO. .
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1993 SPECIALIZED PAY PLAN
WHEREAS, Section 310.17 of the Ordinance Code of the City of
Richfield provides that the pay grades, the number of steps or
range of each pay grade, the compensation rates in each pay
grade, and the method of normal progression through the pay grade
be established by Council resolution; and.
WHEREAS, the City administration has prepared a 1993 pay
plan for the positions for which there are no essentially similar
position classifications in other regular pay plans. The City
Manager is authorized to add or reclassify positions as
necessary. Examples of positions in each pay grade are attached.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council do and
hereby does establish for the year 1993 the following pay plan,
which is to be effective on January 1, 1993, and subject to the
provisions of the personnel rules and regulations ordinance:
SPECIALIZED PAY PLAN
INTERMITTENT AND SEASONAL
Pay
Grade Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
SP1-E HR 4.20* 4.41 4.64 4.85 5.10
. SP2-E HR 4.67 4.88 5.13 5.38 5.65
SP3-E HR 5.03 5.27 5.55 5.82 6.12.
u4-E HR 5.44 5.70 6.00 6.28 6.60
SP5-E HR 5.86 6.15 6.47 6.78 7.13
SP6-E HR 6.34 6.66 6.99 7.33 7.71
SP7-E HR 6.85 7.17 7.53 7.92 8.31
SP8-E HR 7.41 7.77 8.14 8.56 8.98
SP9-E HR 7.98 8.37 8.79 9.23 9.69
SP10-E HR 8.62 9.06 9.52 9.98 10.49
SP11-E HR 9.31 9.76 10.26 10.77 11.30
SP12-E HR 10.03 10.55 11.06 11.62 12.21
Instructo r's Range: $5.00 - $50.00
R.Y.E.S. Home Service Worker: $4.25
Election Judge : $5.25
Election Co-Chair: $5.50
Election Chairperson: $6.00
*This step only applies to Po ol Attendant and Dri ving Range I who
are under 18 years old and w ork less than 20 hou rs per wee k.
Normal Progression Through the Specialized Pay Plan `
Individual employees will be eligible to receive increases to the
next higher grade step based on individual performance and the
following progression:
a. Step 1 - Start
b. Step 2 - One year from anniversary date
c. Step 3 One year from last increase
d. Step 4 - One year from last increase
e. Step 5 - One year from last increase
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this day of December, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
•
s
. 1 E Driving Range I 7 NE Accounting Clerk
E Pool Attendant NE Adaptive Program Spvr.
NE Assessment Clerk
i 2 NE Concession I (All sites EXCEPT NE Concession Supervisor(All
Pool, Veteran's & Taft) sites EXCEPT Pool)
NE Ice Guard NE Construction Specialist
E Concession I (Pool, Veteran's NE Licensing Clerk
& Taft only) NE Naturalist I
E Facility Cashier NE Zamboni Operator
E Facility Rental Attendant E Concession Supervisor-Pool
E Golf 'Course Technician I
3 NE Bike Patrol Officer
NE Concession II (All sites 8 NE Adaptive Coordinator
EXCEPT Pool, Vet's & Taft) NE Construction Inspector
NE Scorer/Timer NE Farmers Market Coord.
NE Special Events Worker NE Naturalist Coordinator
NE Sports Attendant I E Golf Course Technician II
E Concession II (Pool, Veteran's E Playground Coordinator
& Taft) E Tennis Coordinator
E Pool Day Watch E Winter Golf Course Tech.
4 NE Custodian I 9 NE Comm. Development Tech.
NE Maintenance Laborer I E Pool Supervisor
NE Men Open Gym Attendant E Special Facilities Coord.
NE Dance Coordinator
NE Sports Attendant II 10 NE Engineering Aide
NE Video Production Assistant E Clubhouse Coordinator
E Pool Night Watch
E Ranger 11 None
E Warming House Attendant
• E Waterslide Attendant(Parks) 12 None
5 NE Adaptive Assistant Instructors
NE Custodian II NE Building Inspector
NE Intern NE Figure Skating
NE Liquor Cashier NE Hockey (Arena)
NE Liquor Clerk NE Housing & Redev. Tech.
NE Maintenance Laborer II NE Sports Official
NE Substitute Van Driver NE Dance
NE Survey Crew Person E Cross Country Ski
NE Winter Sports Attendant E Golf Professional
E Driving Range II E Hockey (Outside)
E Golf Course Laborer I E Tennis
E Lifeguard
E Par-3/Driving Range Attend. Other Home Service Worker $4.25
E Starter Election Judge $5.25
Election Co-Chair $5.50
6 NE Adaptive Leader/Specialist Election Chairperson $6.00
NE Clerk Typist- Int. & Sub.
NE Concession III(All sites (Rev. 10-92)
EXCEPT Pool)
NE Maintenance Laborer III
NE Pro Shop Attendant
NE Substitute Naturalist
E Concession III (Pool only)
E Golf Course Laborer II
E Outdoor Skating Supervisor
E Playground Leader
E Waterslide Attendant(Pool)
NE=Non-Exempt, may work up to 40 hours per week without overtime pay.
E=Exempt, may work up to 48 hours per week without overtime pay.
;w
All Pool Positions are exempt from overtime, even Concessions. .
All Golf Positions except Concessions/Pro Shop positions are
exempt.
All-Playground and Outdoor Rink positions are exempt.
All Community Center, WoodLake Nature Center, Ice Arena &
Maintenance positions are non-exempt.
•
0
.
•
?J
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING ESTABLISHED 1993 LICENSE.
PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX 0 OF
THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
RESCINDING RESOLUTION 10. 7839
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota 49 follows:
Section 1. Establishing Fees
A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in
the sections of this Resolution.
B. A period of no less then 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained
in Sections 5,7, 8 and 9 of this resolution.
C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section S. 7. 8 and 9 of the resolution
if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of
the license.
0. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not
been paid in a timely manner.
Section 2. Construction and Related Permit Fees and Charoes
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING TOTAL VALUATION FEE SCHEDULE
(1) Building 400.03-400.09 = I $ 500 $15.00
Permits = SO1 $ 2.000 $15 plus $2 for each $100
(2) Fire Extinquishing 400.03-400.09
System Permit
(3) Swimming 420.00
(3a) Public Swiming
Pool inspection
(4) Plan
Review
Fee
420.10
400.03-400.09
and State
..Building code
or fraction thereof over $500
$ 2.001 $ 25.000 $45 plus $9.00 for each $1,000
or fraction thereof over $2,000
$ 25.001 $ 50,000 $252 plus $6.50 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $25,000
$ 50,001 $ 100,000 $414.50 plus $4.50 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $50,000
$ 100,001 $ 500,000 $639.50 plus $3.50 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $100,000
$ 500,001 $1 ,000,000 $2,039.50 plus $3.00 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $500,000
$1. 000,001 and up $3,539.50 plus 2.00 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $1,000,000
Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of $20.00
-Permanent above or below ground pools are based on Building Permit.
-Portable Pools $13.50
No fee shall be charged for construction or erection of any
pool 24 inches or less in depth at its deepest part and not
exceeding 177 sq. ft. In water surface area
1st Pool $85.00
Each Additional $45.00
65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following:
(a) Existing.single family dwelling alterations when habitable
area is'riot enlarged.
(b) Single and two family dwelling repair and maintenance work.
(c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance
work not exceeding $1,000 or where plans are not required.
(d) Residential garages and storage buildings.
R-9
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE' REOUIRIN6
(0) Contractors License Verification Fee
(5) Moving Dwellings 845 `
and Buildings other
than Dwellings
(6) Garage 845
Moving
(7) Structure Demolitian 400.00-400.09
(a) Commercial
(b) Dwelling
(8) Excavation in Public 800.01-800.15
Right of way
(9) Utility Abandonment
700.05
710.01
(9A) Certifcation Charge 705.03-705.21
(Delinquent)
(10) (a) Sewer 700.05...
Construction
(b) Water Service 715.01
Service Connection
(11) Plumbing Permit 400.03-.400.09
1
EEC
55.00
Pre-inspection Fee: •
-IN Richfield $35.00
-OUTSIDE Richfield $70.00
Moving Permit Fee:
-WITHIN Richfield $35.00
-INTO Richfield $70.00
Moving Out of City $35.00
Pre-inspection Fee:
(if relocated in City) $23.00
Moving Permit Fee first stall $16.00
-Plus each adjoining stall $ 9.00
Moving out of City $16.00
Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of $25.00
1. One or two story $22.00
2. Multiple First Unit $22.00
-plus each additional unit $10.00
3. Residential
-Garage and lesser structure $ 8.50
For each transverse excavation and $20.00
each 300 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation
and for each curb and gutter section installed
or driveway apron installed
Except when survey and grade stakes are set by City $75.00
(a) Sewer $20.00 •
(b) Water $20.00
$20.00
Residential $20.00
Industrial/Commercial $30.00
As per Ordinance
To connect to existing water service leads at the curb box $20.00
To connect to main where a curb box and service lead is not installed
the fee is the actual cost of material and estimated cost of labor.
To turn on water after-discontinuance of service $20.00
For raising or lowering stop-box tops to correspond with ground level
change made by property owner. Cost plus 30% material and labor
-Residential
(a) Minimum Fee $30.00
(b) Fee for each fixture including:
-Bath Tub -Laundry Tray
-Bidet -lavatory
-Clothes Dryer -Sewage Ejector
-Dishwasher -Shower Stall
-Disposal -Sink
-Floor Drain -Water Closet
-Floor Tray -Water Heater (New or Replacement)
-Any Fixture Not listed $ 9.00
Gas piping per unit including:
-Gas Grill -Gas Oven
-Gas Incinerator -Gas Plate
-Gas Stove -Gas Light $ 9.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING M
(11) Plumbing Permit(Con't.) (c) Lawn Sprinkler, AntiSyphon system (includes water
- eonnnection from building piping and yard side of syphon breaker) $25.00
• (d) Pool heater (up to 199,000 BTU) $35.00
(e) Water Softner $ 9.50
(f) Water supply or distribution piping extension or alteration s 9.50
(g) Sewer and Waste Alteration/Repair $ 9.50
(12) Plumbing Permit 400.03-400.09 Commercial
(a) Minimum Fee $40.00
(b) Fee per fixture including:
Plaster Interceptor, Bidet-Disposer, Drinking Fountain,
Floor Drain or Trap
Sinks:
Bradley type wash-up, Laboratory, Service-Counter, Flat/rim,
Pot or Scullery, Bar
Urinal - Water heater
Any fixture not listed above $10.00
(c) Clothes Dryer- 1-5 Units $25.00
Each Additional Unit $ 7.50
(d) Dental Chair $30.00
(e) Dishwasher $19.00
(f) Food Cold Case-Condensate Lines (each unit) $ 7.50
(g) Flammable Waste Trap - Catch Basin 519.00
(h) 6round run (new for existing building) =19.00
(i).Ice Making Machines 510.00
(j) Indirect coil for hot water storage $13.50
(k) Lawn Sprinkler, AntiSyphon System (Including water
connection from building piping to yard
side of syphon breaker) $38.00
(1) Neutralizing Tank $38.00
(m) Rainwater Leader:
All stacks 7 stories or less $19.00
All stacks over 7 stories $30.00
(n) Roof Area Drains: Each Drain $10.00
(o) Sewage Ejector $25.00
(p) Shower (gang type per head) S 5.50
(q) Water softner $25.00
(r) Water supply or distribution piping. extension or alteration $19.00
(s) Sewer and Waste alteration/repair 519.00
(t) Installation of 6as Piping:
1. Up to 2" in diameter First 3 openings $ 9.00
Each additional opening S 4.S0
• 11. Exceeding 2" in diameter:
First 3 openings $20.00
Each additional opening $ 5.50
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING HE
(13) Plumbing Permit 400.03-400.09
Gas Unit (Burners)
Installation
99,000 BTU or less
$ 13.50 •
100,000 - 199,000 BTU $ 19.00
200,000 - 399,000 BTU $ 33.00
400,000 $99,000 BTU $ 49.00
600,000 - 999,999 BTU = 64.00
1,000,000 - 2,499,000 BTU $109.00
2,500,000 - 9,999,000 BTU $129.00
10,000,000 - 49,999,000 BTU $183.00
50,000,000 - 74,999,000 BTU $233.00
more than - 74,999,000 BTU $306.00
(14) Plumbing 620
Permit Yells 2" Casing $13.50
3" Casing $16.00
4" Casing $21.00
5" Casing $37.00
6" Casing $49.00
(15) Electrical Permit 400.03-.400.09
Residential
(a) Minimum Fee $30.00
(b) Complete Wiring Fee:
Single Family Residence $55.00
Two Family Residence $106.00
(c) New Service - up to 200 amps $13.50
(d) Temporary Service - (for construction) $19.00
(e) Installation or replacement of each major appliance during •
or after completion of building $ 9.00
(f) Swimming Pools $25.00
(g) Wiring of Addition:
First Room $13.50
Each Additional Room $ 6.50
(h) Rewiring
First Room $13.50
Each Additional Room $ 6.50
(i) Wiring for Residential Garages $13.50
(j) Furnace or Air Conditioning: Per Unit $ 9.00
(k) Electrical Heating System:
2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $19.00
(1) Electric (Infrared Heaters) Radiant: Per Unit $ 9.00
(m) Electric Baseboard Radiant Units: Per Unit $ 9.00
(n) Fire and intrusion alarms - 1-5 Stations $18.00
Each group.of 10 additional stations or portion thereof $13.50
(o) Work requried to comply with minimum Housing Code provisions
other than new service - 2% of contract cost with minimum of $18.00
0
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING f?
(16) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Multiple Dwellings over two-family
. (a) Minimum Fee $25.00
(b) Complete Wiring
2% of estimated job costs (includes
appliances at time of construction)
(c) Wiring or Garages First Stall. $19.00
Each Additional Stall $ 4.50
(d) Temporary Service for Construction $19.00
(e) Swimming Pools $59.00
(f) Rewiring
First Unit $25.00
Each Additional Unit $13.50
(g) Furnace or Air Conditioner
Each Unit under 4 Tons $25.00
Each Unit 4 Tons or Over -
2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $25.00
(h) Electrical Heating System
(Central Type) 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $18.00
(i) Electrical Infrared Nesters (Radiant) Per Unit 5 9.00
(j) Electrical Baseboard Radiant Units Per Unit 5 9.00
(k) Fire and Intrusion Alarms - 1-5 Stations $18.00
Each group of 10 Addt'l Stations or portion thereof $13.50
•
(17) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Commercial and Industrial
Minimum Fee $40.00
(a) Permanent Service: Based on total job cost
- 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $40.00
- Over $50,000 - Fee/ $1,000.00 plus 1 1/2% of cost over $50,000
(b) Temporary Services for Construction:
0-100 amps $19.00
100 * amps $30.00
(c) Traffic Signals: Per Intersection $185.00
(d) Elevators:
Per Elevator - Hydraulic $50.00
Per Elevator - Electric $100.00
(18) Electrical Permit 4D0.03-400.09 Based on cost of Electrical Job to Customer
Signs - $0 - $100 $40.00
- $101 - $50.000 - 2% of estimated job cost with a.minimum of $40.00
- Over $50,000 - Fee/ $1,000.00 plus 1 1/2% of cost over $50,000
(19) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Telephone Booths: Wiring of Booth (includes company signs) $25.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING RE
(20) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air
Conditioning and Refrigeration (a). Central System •
1 1/2% estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(b) Additions, Alterations and Repairs
1 1/2% estimated cost with a minimum of :.=30.00
(c) Addition oT Air Conditioning to existing heating systems
1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(d) Furnace or Boiler Replacement
1 112% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(21) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air Conditioning
Ventilation and Exhaust Systems (a) Systems installed with central systems
1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(22) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration, 6as and Oil (a) Permit for installations or replacement of Conversion burner,'
unit heater, floor furnace, wall heater or space heater
Per unit with input of up to 99,000 BTU $13.00
1 1/2% of estimated cost of units exceeding 99.000 BTU
with per unit minimum of $30.00
(b) 6as Piping
Per unit for 1st five (5) units $ 4.50
Each additional unit $ 3.50
(23) Heating, 400.03-.400.09
Ventilation,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration (a) Conversion from L.P. to natural gas .
Each heating unit $ 7.50
Each minor appliance $ 5.50
With a minimum fee of $10.00
(24) Heating, 400.03-.400.09
Ventilation,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration (a) Process Equipment
(Installed of any steam; hot water or warm air system fired with gas
or oil used in connection with process application.)
1 1/2% of cost with a minimum of $30.00
(25) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilation,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration (a) Fuel storage Tanks (Underground or Enclosed)
Storage Tanks Installation to be used with oil burner only.
Per tank not exceeding 1,000 gal. $10.00
Per tank exceeding 1,000 gal. $20.00
(b) Fuel Storage Tanks (Above ground or not enclosed)
Installation to be used with oil burner only. Per tank $10.00
(c) Other Tanks (Installation modification, removal.sbandonment)
Each above ground tank $30.00
Each below ground tank $80.00
For.installation,or alteration of piping $15.00
(26) Heating, 400.03-400.09 ,
Ventilating,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration Installation of stokers and/or power fuel burners
1 1/2% of Sob cost with minimum of $30.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRIN
f.EE
(27) Heating,
Ventilating, Air 400.03-400.09
Conditioning,
Refrigeration, Gas Fired Heating 6as Fired Infrared (radiant) Neater
First Unit S 8.75
Additional Unit S 6.50
(28) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration,
Refrigeration sys tems, Additions,
alterations and repairs 1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(29) Heating. 400.03-400.09
Ventilating,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration Installation, alteration, modification, relocation or replacement
of nonportable propane or LP or propane storage facility
Each tank $20.00
Each Vaporizer $10.00
Sea Piping $10.00
(30) Benches 805.01-805.27 First Year $21.00
Renewal $14.50
(31) Fire 400.21-400.29
Prevention Code For initial fee required under code- per year $25.00
For each additional fee required under code - per year $10.00
If not renewed within 2 months of notification add penalty of $15.00
(32) Sign 415.01-415.11
Installation 50 sq. ft. or less per sign $25.00
Each additional 50 sq. ft. or less - per 50 sq. ft. $15.00
(a) Sign support structures based on Bldg. permit fee schedule
(33) Parking Areas BDD.15-800.23 $ 8.00
(34) Housing 400.11-400.17 , First Unit $75.00
Inspection Fee Additional Unit $25.00
This fee should apply to each inspection when:
1. Seller calls for minimum housing inspection
2. Homeowner calls for minimum housing inspection
3. House industry calls for minimum housing inspection
4. 6overnment agencies call for minimum housing inspection
S. Private lending institution calls for minimum housing inspection
SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED LICE NSE FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING fE
(1) Heating and 400.07
Ventilating
Installer 1 Year $45.00
(2) Sign Installer 416.01-416.13 1 Year $40.00
(3) Electrical Install er 400.03-.400.09 State License Required
(4) Plumber 400.03-400.09 State License Required
(5) Well Driller 620 State License Required
• (6) Tree Contractors 1197 $25.00
SECT ION 4. ZONING. LAND USE AND RELATED CIIAR 6ES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
QR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1)* Planned Unit 530 (a) $400 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a waxiaum fee of
Development (b) PUD Plan Amendment fee
(2)* C-3 Zoning District 520.35 (a) $300 plus $5 / $1,000 of project value to a a»xinun fee of
Site Plan Review (b) Plan Amendment Fee
Transitional Activity
Permit 520.57 $300 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a waximun fee of
(3)* Variance 545.05 Residential
Non Residential
(4)* Conditional 545.09 $400 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a staxiaum fee of
Use Permit
(5)* Zoning District
Change 545.11
(6)* Subdivision Approval 500.01-5D0.05
Subdivision Waiver 500.05-Subd. 2
* Any additional expense of notification necessitated by applicants
request for continuance will be charged to applicant.
(7) Off-street
Parking Permit 545.09 (a) As part of conditional use permit process
800.15-80D.23 (b) In conjunction with permitted use
(8) Street Vacation 820
(9) Forestry Permit BID
SECTION 5. AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Arcade 1105
(2) Amusement 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball)
Device (b) Mechanical Music Box
(c) Video Games Per Premise
1. 1-5 video games
2. 6-10 video games
3. over 10 games $150 plus each additional
(3) Lawful 6ambling 1100.13 Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs
(a) Lawful 6ambling Permit
(those exempt from State Licensure)
(State Statute 349.213)
(b) Lawful 6ambling Investigative Fee
(State Statute 349.16) STATE LICENSE REQUIRED
(4) Itinerant Place
of Amusement 1100.05-1100.11
(5) Public Dance 1110.03 For each day dances are held -$2
No fee for locations holding tavern licenses.
1 Year
1 Year
1 Year
1 Year
1 Year
UE
$3,000.00
$500.00
$3,000.00
$500.00
$3,000.00
$200.00
$400.00
$3,000.00
$450.00
$500.00
$450.00
No Fee
$200.00
$350.00
$ 10.00
fu
$300.00
$45.00
$45.00
$100.00
$200.00
$10.00
•
1 year $100.00
1 year $300.00
1 day $160.00
$25.00 M0.
r ?
U
sTYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(6) General
Amusement 1100.03
0
(6a) Musical Concert 1110.01
(7) Theatre Cinema 1120
(8) Roller Rink 1115
(9) Commercial Adult- 605
Oriented Enterprises
(10) Massage
Practitioner 605
(a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 year
1. Coin operated 1 year
(b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 year
(c) Circus 1 year
(d) Dance Hall 1 day
(e) Golf
1. Minature 1 year
2. Driving Tee 1 year
(f) Mountback 1 day
(g) Rides, mechanical or animal of any kind (each) 1 year
(h) Shows, any kind 1 day
(i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 year
(j) Other games 1 day
Per event
1 year
Plus a notice publication fee
1' year or portion thereof
1 Year
Investigation fee 1 year
Certificate fee
Investigation fee
(11) Public Baths 610
Investigation fee (actual cost minimum)
• (12) Fortune Teller 1130.05-1130.07
and related trade
SECTION 6. ANIMAL LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Animals 905.01-905.29 (a) Dog
(b) Cat
(c) Duplicate
(d) Late Penalty
905.31-905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel
(f) Residential Kennel
905.37-905.39 (g) Pigeons
905.41 (h) Non-domestic Animals
905.01-905.29 (i) Impounding
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 day
1 week
1 month
1 year
1 year
1 year
Either dog or cat
Each animal
1 year
1 year
1 year
Temporary Permit
each Animal
1st time
2nd Time
(& each impound after)
FEE
$32.00
$90.00
$25.00
$129.00
$129.00
$30.00
$30.00
$124.00
$19.00
$124.00
$14.00
$63.00
$25.00
$124.00
$ 6.50
$124.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$50.00
$124.00
$1,737.00
$1,737.00
$100.00
$300.00
$600.00
$1,000.00
FEE
$9.00
$8.00
$5.50
$1.00
$150.00
$85.00
$30.00
$20.00
$25.00
$50.00
E
'
SECTION 7. VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTATION LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REOUIRING FEE
(1) Bicycle 1335 Minnesota State Registration •
(2) Aircraft 1340 1 day $30.00
(3) Food Vehicle 615 (a) Bakery vehicle 1 year $75.00
(b) Catering - per year for first food vehicle $160.00
Second vehicle $65.00
Each additional vehicle $35.00
(c) Readily perishable (Same as (b) above)
(4a) Garbage and Refuse
Collection 601.01-601.33 Per year for first vehicle $150.00
(Commercial and Residential) Each additional vehicle $32.00
(4b) Residential Waste 601.01-601.33 Recycling Collection Fee - per household per month 49t
Haulers
(5) Motor Vehicle
Dealer 1155 Per year first place of business $175.00
Per year - each additional place of buisness $65.00
(6) Motor Bicycle
Business 1160 Per year per place of business $129.00
Per year per place of business to sell, rent or lease $65.00
(7) Sound Truck 1165 1 year per vehicle $129.00
1 day per vehicle $20.00
(8) Taxicab 1170 Per year - first vehicle or auto livery $325.00 •
Per year - each additional vehicle or auto livery
operated at any time within license period $40.00
(9) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 year $30.00
(10) Rental or Utility 1185
Trailers and Trucks Per year each place of business $65.00
SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Firearms Dealer 920.01-920.05
(2) Itinerant Food 615
Establishment
(3) Retail Candy 615 Per year - first facility
Shop Per year - each additional on same premises
(4) Food Establishment 615
FEE
1 year $200.00
1 year $80.00
$80.00
$20.00
(a) Retail or Wholesale Food Sales (Grocery) 1 year $210.00
(b) Restaurant (Prepackaged food only sold for consumption)1 year $210.00
(c) Restaurant (Prepared food sold for consumption) 1 year $395.00
(d) Plan Review Fee (New/remodeled food preparation facility) $125.00
(e) Additional Food Facilities
(Baked goods, meat, produce, microwave ovens) Each $11.00
0
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
R LICENSE REQUIRING f
(5) Vending Machine 615 (a) Food vending machine requiring coin or token (excepting those
• machines dispensing bottled or canned soft drinks) I year $15.00
• (b) Other food vending machines (excepting those dispensing
bottled or canned soft drinks) 1 year $15.00
(c) Ice vending machine 1 year $15.00
(6) Automobile Washing
Establishment 1125 Per calendar year or fraction' thereof $100.00
(7) Scavenger 600.25 Per year each vehicle $30.00
Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contacts of each
cesspool into City sewer (15.00
(8) Incinerator 600.01-600.23 1 year $30.00
(9) Tobacco 1145.03(MS 461.12)
Retail Sale and Distribution - per month or fraction
thereof License issued on calendar year basis (cigaret te
vending machines prohibited, bill No. 1990-7 4-21-90) $30.00
(10) Soft drink 1145.01
(a) Cans, bottles from shelf or cooler, fountain service $25.00
(b) Vending machine dispensing bottles or cans -0-
(c) Other vending machines 1 year $25.00
Per year or fraction thereof
per each additional machine $25.00
(11) Transient
Merchant 1181.01-1181.09 1 day $60.00
(12) Wagon
Peddler 1181 1 year $150.00
(13) Christmas
Tree Sales 1130.0$ I year $80.00
(14) Motel 1190 First Unit $140.00
Per year each additional unit $ 9.00
(15) Outdoor 1135
Merchandising Permit $65.00
(16) Storage
Enclosure 1135 Per Enclosure $56.00
(17) Pawnbroker, 1186 (a) Pawnbroker 1 year $1,750.00
and Secondhand
Goods Dealer (b) Secondhand Goods Dealer I year $300.00
(c) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs
in excess of above with total not exceeding $1,200.00
Applicant shall deposit $1,200.00 with City Clerk along with
application. Amount in excess of actual investigation
costs shall be refunded.
(18) Auto'Detailing 1195.01
Establishment 1 year $225.00
¦ :
SECTION 9. LIQUOR AND RE LATED LICENSE AND PE RMIT FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING ff,E
(1) NonIntoxicating
Malt liquor 1210 (a) On-Sale 1 year $550.00 .
(b) Tavern (dance) 1 year $450.00
(c) Wholesale 1 year $21.00
(d) Off-Sale 1 year $160.00
(e) Club (bottle Club) 1 year . '=365.00
(2) Liquor 1200.01-1200.25,
1200.29-1200.39 (a) On-Sale I year $11,200.00
1215 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law) 1. year $200.00
1225 (c) Wine 1 year $800.00
1200.01-12D0.25, (d) Veterans' Organization (Ex-Sunday) 1 year $520.00
1200.29-1200.39
(3) Employee License 1200.01-1200.25, Per year/per person covered S 21.00
On-Sale Liquor 1200.29-1200.39 Expires on June 30th
Establishments next following the effective date
(4) Investigation 1200.01-1200.25, (a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization
Fee 1200.29-1200.39 each person shown on application $500.00 and
actual costs in excess of above.
Each additional investigation for each person not
listed on original or renewal application. $150.00
1225 (b) Wine - Original Application initial Fee $275,00 and
actual costs in excess of above
with total fee not to exceed $2,107.00
Renewal Application Initial Fee $ 62.00 and
actual costs in excess of above
with total cost not to exceed $2,107.00 •
1200.09 Additional Investigation under 1200.09 Subdivision 3 $124.00 and
not to exceed 32,107.00
Investigation of substitute manager $62.00
SECTION 10. NISCELLANEOU S FEES
(1) Registration 1181 (a) State hawker or Peddler license
6 month/per person covered $30.00
(b) Canvasser or Solicitor
6 month/per person covered $30.00
(2) Permit to reside 1190 In motel for more than six months $15.00
(3) license for 405.25 (a) Apartment House (includes first 4 Units) 1 year $55.00
Apartment Houses and Rental Homes each additional unit in excess of 4 $ 8.25
(b) Rental Home - single family dwelling 1 year $55.00
(c) Duplexes/double bungalows, triples and quads I year
First unit $55.00
Each additional rental unit $20.00
(d) Late Fee
10% penalty for each month or portion thereof
during which said fee remains unpaid.
0
a
(4) Certificate of 405.26
Housing maintenance
Compliance
(5) Permit Fee for
Rooming House 405.19
(e) license Transfer Fee $10.00
(f) Reinstatement of suspended license
50% of license fee
(9) Reinstatement of Revoked license
100% of license fee
(a) Single family home or owner/occupied
portion of a 2-family home $55.00
+1 year $75.00
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this day of January. 1993.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
R, J