01-27-92 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, JANUARY 27, 1992
E
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF (1) CITY COUNCIL CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION
OF JANUARY 13, 1992; (2) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY
13, 1992; (3) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 15, 1992;
AND (4) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1992
PRESENTATIONS
1. OPPORTUNITY FOR PERSONS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT
LISTED ON THE AGENDA
AGENDA APPROVAL
•
2. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE
ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT
CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND RECOMMENDED
ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS
NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM
BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON
THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
3A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AMENDING ESTABLISHED
1992 LICENSE, PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES PURSUANT TO
PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF THE CITY ORDINANCE CODE C.L. 22
B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION RESETTING RATES FOR
THE STORM SEWER UTILITY FOR 1992 AT NO INCREASE FROM 1991
C.L. 23
C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AMENDING 1992 GENERAL
FUND BUDGET C.L. 24
D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR
THE CHURCH OF ST. PETER'S TO CONDUCT LAWFUL GAMBLING C.L. 25
E. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF FIVE FORD CROWN
VICTORIA FULL- SIZED POLICE SEDANS, PLUS ONE SERVICE MANUAL,
THROUGH THE JO INT HENNEPIN COUNTY PURCHASING AGREEMENT FROM
SUPERIOR FORD FOR AN AMOUNT OF $64,025 C.L. 26
F. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF ONE 1992 CHEVROLET
ASTRO MINIVAN THROUGH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA PURCHASING
AGREEMENT FROM EGGEBRECHT CHEVROLET OF DULUTH FOR AN AMOUNT
OF $15,296.75 C.L. 27
G. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 FOR
ONE UTILITY MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAM FROM HANSEN
SOFTWARE, INC. FOR AN AMOUNT OF $9,300 C.L. 28
H. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 FOR
1991 WATER APPROPRIATION PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT
OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR AN AMOUNT OF $5,985 C.L. 29
I. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF 1992 LICENSE RENEWALS:
AIRPORT & AIRLINE TAXI: 85 VEHICLES
S & R DETAILING: AUTO DETAILING
WALLY MCCARTHY'S OLDS INC.: MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER
PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF TRANSITORY ORDINANCE
PROVIDING FUNDING FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 30
5. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
SALE OF 7300 FIRST AVENUE AND ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLETION CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 31
PROPOSED ORDINANCES
6. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTION 601 OF THE CITY CODE REQUIRING RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS
• AND BUSINESSES TO CONTRACT FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE
32
7. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTION 601 OF THE CITY CODE REQUIRING SEPARATION OF
RECYCLABLE MATERIALS FROM MIXED SOLID WASTE BY RESIDENTIAL
HOUSEHOLDS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 33
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS & OTHER BUSINESS
8. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF 1991 PAY EQUITY IMPLEMENTATION
REPORT FOR SUBMISSION TO MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYEE
RELATIONS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 34
9. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS OF PERSONS TO VARIOUS ADVISORY
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 35
OR TO PROVIDE AN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTALLY LETTER NO. SOUND ALTERNATIVE
• AIRPORT BUSINESS
10. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT
CORRESPONDENCE
11. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
COUNCIL CHOICE
12. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS
13. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
ADJOURNMENT
0
0
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
. Council Letter No 35
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Appointments ofpersons to various Advisory Boards and
Commissions.
Background:
Several terms of City Boards and Commissions expire January 31,
1992. In addition, some Commissions have vacancies resulting
from resignations. Vacancies were advertised in the Richfield
Sun Current.
Applicants were interviewed on February 15 and 22, 1992.
Recommended Motion:
Appoint members to fill the terms on the various Boards and
Commissions.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. Terms of members expire on January 31. In order to assure
quorums for future meetings, appointments should be made at
this time.
• Alternative Recommendation:
1. Defer appointments to a later Council meeting.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is placed on the January 27, 1992 Council agenda for
Council consideration. Appointments will begin February 1, 1992.
Respectfu ly submitted,
Jame Prosser
City nager
JDP:ds
0
1-/
• LO In In In LO
y% In
O• In
0% In
ON In
ON In
m LO
O` It7
ON Lf)
ON M
O% M
O•
ON
ON M
ON a•
ON ?
0% C
ON ON ON O? ON ON 0? ON a% ON 0%
ri r? ri ri ri r? H H r-I r-i H r-I r-I ri H
.
r-1 .
r-I .
H .
r? .
r I .
. -I .
H .
r-i .
r-4 .
H .
ri .
ra .
r•i .
ri .
r-I
M M M M M M CO M M M M M M Cl)
M
Dr Dr >•1 >Y >1 'Jr >4 >Y >4 >4 >4 Dv
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
? s~ ? ? s~ t~ s~ G ? >~ G s~ ? ? ?
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h
ro
fi
ro
a?
a?
4-) U
y
V! N
H ro
4
0
b
•ri 4-)
?
N
0 a
H 0
0 (a 4
V -r
i 0) 'J+ a)
0 _ 11-1
0 N aa) ? 4-)
co r- ro M t~ b s~ C+
(a I ?
r-i > (o ri) z
( N
In o p
r-I H 10 0 v .?
I I W W
r-I rn? I
ri 0 ?
• V! H
U
x 0 H
a) W H ro
w 44 w a
0 U U
Q > r-I
0) W
5
C: H 5 al
r E
?
I > p F
i ',[''
. p
A
am ? a?
RS
C
.' M H
H D E N N
H (1) 04 i
a
q Q ? p
I
-I
RCM.x U M UM M
. LO LO LO M M
ON ON ON 0) ON
ON ON ON 0) ON
r 1.4 ?A r•1 r-4
M M M M M
ro ? m m ?
h h h h h
is
ro
a?
0
ro
ro
LO
I
z
O
H
H
O
U
W
U
H 5
?4
a a)
W 4.)
zero
ro
co
p
?4 m
? ? ?
•
b b
p p U
•ri rl (0
a a ?
a) a) M
v ? z
O
H
W
H
E
O E
U ?1
04-)
z
H f-1
z LO
a ?
L1a M
LO LO LO LO LO LO 10 M M M
0% Olt rn ON ON O% 0% 01 ON O\
ON ON ON ON Olt (A ON ON m 0%
. . . . . . . . . .
r-I ?-I .-I e-I e-1 r-I H H .- i
co M co M M M M M M M
a ro m ? a m m ?
c
d ? m c
d
h h h h h h h h h h
ro
a?
0
ro
ti
ro
a?
b
z
ro
N
a
` N
ro +-)
a) 0
r. ?
U aii
>?
O
LO 44
1 5
z a?
041
H
V! ro
H a)
OH
U
?+ E
E S4
H (1)
U 41
a p
94 tio
E-4 >1
H
(a M
p b b
p p
b ro
.H •r1
a a
x ?
a) a)
1~ ?
• CITY OF RICHFIELD,, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No-34
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement
Approval of the 1991 Pay Equity Implementation Report.
Background:
In 1984, the State Legislature passed the Comparable Worth Law.
The purpose of the law was to eliminate sex-based wage
disparities by requiring all political subdivisions to establish
equitable compensation relationships. The law required
jurisdictions to evaluate jobs, analyze pay structures and
develop and report on an implementation plan by October 1985. It
was later amended to establish a deadline for implementation,
require an implementation report and provide for financial
penalties for any jurisdictions found out of compliance.
The City of Richfield was one of the 146 jurisdictions which
joined together to conduct a job evaluation study. The system
chosen by this group was the Control Data Business Advisors Job
Evaluation System which is now called the PDI, Inc. system. The
job evaluation system established the comparable worth value for
each job. The comparable worth value was used to analyze pay
relationships.
• The law also required the City of Richfield to analyze its pay
and to identify "classes for which a compensation inequity exists
based on the comparable worth." The City of Richfield analyzed
its internal pay structure for evidence of sex-based wage
disparities and took steps to correct those disparities. Based
on the available evaluation criteria, it appears that the City of
Richfield achieved equitable compensation relationships by
December 31, 1991.
The Minnesota Department of Employee Relations, which is charged
with determining compliance with the Pay Equity Law, has
promulgated administrative rules which have the full force and
affect of law. Those new rules were approved by the Minnesota
Chief Administrative Law Judge on January 2, 1992. The City
received the report forms and instructions on January 13, 1992.
The computer software for determining compliance is, to date,
unpublished. The 1991 Pay Equity Implementation Report for the
City of Richfield was prepared in a good faith effort to bring
the City into compliance with the Pay Equity Statute.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the 1991 Pay Equity Implementation Report for submission
to the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The Minnesota State Statutes mandate that a job evaluation
study be undertaken by local governments to identify
potential sex-based pay inequities and submit a plan to
correct any inequities.
f- l
2. The results of the Comparable Worth Job Evaluation Study
indicated some pay adjustments were necessary and those have
been made.
3. Failure on the City's part to submit a report incurs a
penalty of a five percent (5%) reduction in state aid
payments and other payments from the state, or $100 per day
whichever is greater.
4. On October 1, 1987 the City lost its immunity to lawsuits by
employees claiming.pay inequities based upon sex
discrimination.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council may take no action to approve the 1991 Pay Equity
Implementation Report. However, the City will automatically
be found out of compliance and incur a penalty..
2. The Council could direct staff to modify the report or
conduct additional study prior to January 31, 1992.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Council should approve the 1991 Pay Equity Implementation
Report effective January 27, 1992 so that it may be submitted in
a timely manner with further adjustments to be made as needed,
should the City be found out of compliance.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame Prosser
City anager
JDP:cak
0
7
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 33
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
First reading of an ordinance amending Section 601 of the City
Code; requiring the separation of recyclable materials from mixed
solid waste by residential households.
Background
To protect public safety, health and welfare, the Minnesota State
Legislature has adopted a statewide policy pertaining to the
storage, handling, collection and processing of mixed municipal
solid waste and recycling of materials. This policy includes
requiring each county to recycle by 1993 a minimum of 35% by
weight of total solid waste generation (which includes
commercial/industrial and residential); by 1996, this percentage
increases to 45%, and by the year 2000 to 50%.
Hennepin County's 1992 recycling funding policy requires that
cities meet an 18% residential recycling goal in order to qualify
for 80% funding. Under the current policy, the percentage
increases to 20% in 1993. The City of Richfield may not attain
the County's goal without increased participation by residents in
the curbside program.
• Among neighboring cities, Bloomington and Edina both have
mandatory recycling ordinances. Both cities appear to be
exceeding 20% recycling abatement; in comparison, Richfield is
averaging close to 16%. It is anticipated that mandatory
recycling will increase Richfield's recycling percentage, thus
better ensuring that the County'and State recycling goals will be
met. According to ordinance,"':designated recyclables' are
properly prepared and packaged metal beverage and food
containers, glass bottles and jars; newsprint, corrugated
cardboard, and any other materials'.as may be defined by the City
Manager or through State County, or municipal mandates."
It is anticipated that this ordinance would be enforced primarily
on a complaint basis in the same manner as other Code violations.
The Community Services Advisory Commission has reviewed this
proposal. Finally, recycling is good public policy and should be
endorsed by the adoption of this ordinance.
Recommended Motion:
Approve first reading of the ordinance amendment requiring
source-separation of recyclables from mixed municipal solid
waste, and schedule a public hearing and second reading for
February 24, 1992.
0
7-1
• Basis of Recommendation:
1. A source-separation ordinance could increase participation
and total tonnage collected through the City's curbside
recycling program, providing a means to achieve or exceed the
abatement goals set by the County and the State.
2. Meeting or exceeding the 18% recycling goal in 1992 would
qualify Richfield for 80-.reimbursement for recycling
expenses. Richfield's recycling reimbursement is anticipated
to be approximately $240,000 for 1992.
3. Recycling is good public policy.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council could choose not to implement a source-separation
ordinance. However, the City may have a more difficult time
meeting future State and County waste abatement goals.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
First reading is scheduled for the January 27, 1992 Council
meeting.
n
U
JDP:ds
Attachment
ly submitted,
Respecfanager
Jame rosser
City c.
BILL NO. 1992-
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY CODE;
REQUIRING RICHFIELD RESIDENTS TO SEPARATE DESIGNATED RECYCLABLES
FROM GARBAGE AND REFUSE
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
I. Subsection 601.09 of the Richfield City Code is amended
to read:
Subd. 10. Preparation of designated recyclables.
Residents in single-family through eight unit apartment
dwellings must separate designated recyclables from
garbage, refuse, and other wastes. Designated
recyclables should be prepared for collection according
to City specifications, and placed in the recycling bin
on garbage collection day. Designated recyclables may
also be taken to a drop-off site, sold to a buy-back
center, or given to volunteer groups.
CJ
Passed this day of
City Council.
1992 by the Richfield
01 'Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
U
. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No.32
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
First reading of an ordinance amending Section 601 of the City
Code requiring residential households and businesses to contract
for solid waste collection service or to provide an
environmentally sound alternative.
Background:
The proposed ordinance requires residents and businesses to have
their garbage collected by a licensed collector or have an
"environmentally sound" alternative. The Community Services
Commission has reviewed this proposal.
In its 1991 legislative session, the Minnesota Legislature
amended the Waste Management Act to require cities with a
population of 5,000 or more to mandate solid waste collection for
all residents and businesses. The primary intent of the state
law is to address the growing problem of illegal dumping -- a
problem that appears to have grown worse as waste collection
costs have risen.
"Environmentally sound alternatives" can include (but are not
limited to) shared service with a neighbor or other party, or
. delivery of waste to an approved solid waste disposal facility.
It is anticipated that this ordinance would be enforced primarily
on a complaint basis, in the same manner as other Code
violations.
Cities have until July 1, 1992 to implement the State
requirement.
Recommended Motion:
Approve first reading of the ordinance mandating garbage
collection service for Richfield residents and businesses, and
set a public hearing date and second reading for February 24,
1992.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. State law now requires cities to ensure that every
residential household and business have solid waste
collection service.
2. Approval of a first reading ,of the ordinance at this time
would enable the City to comply with the State's requirement.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council could choose to dela a first reading of the ordinance
amendment; however, approval.at this time would ensure that the
• City meets the July 1, 1992 deadline for complying with the State
1 aw.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
First reading is scheduled for January 27, 1992 Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
James D Prosser
City ager
JDP:ds
Attachment
0
Lp
•
•
BILL NO. 1992-
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY CODE;
REQUIRING RICHFIELD RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES TO CONTRACT FOR
GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICE
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
I. Subsection 601.03 of the Richfield City Code is amended to
read:
601.03. Disposal of garbage and refuse. The tenant,
owner, or occupant of a private dwelling, house, multiple
residence, store, restaurant, and other types of property
in the city which accumulate garbage and/or refuse on such
premises shall dispose of such garbage and refuse as
provided in this section. Garbage and refuse must be
disposed of at least once each week and as often as once
each business day if necessary to protect the public
health. The tenant, owner, or occupant of a private
dwelling, house, multiple residence, store, restaurant, or
commercial property must contract with a licensed refuse
hauler to provide garbage collection or must provide an
environmentally sound alternative. Examples of
environmentally sould alternatives include self-hauling of
aarbage to a licensed disposal facility or shared garbage
service with a neighbor or other party. No person may
accumulate or permit to accumulate any refuse on any
property in the city which might constitute a nuisance by
reason of appearance, odor, sanitation, littering of the
property on which the refuse is accumulated, or an
adjacent property, or a fire hazard.
Passed this day of
City Council.
1992 by the Richfield
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 31
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and second reading consideration of an ordinance
authorizing sale of,7300 First Avenue; issuance of Certificate of
Completion contingent upon approval of the City Manager..
Background:
At the January 6, 1992 Council Study Session, staff was directed
to present this item to the Council at a regular meeting.
It is proposed that the property be offered for sale "as is", to
the person submitting the highest offer. That person must also
demonstrate financial capability to carry out the project. The
buyer will be required to bring the house up to code but any
additional work will be voluntary. The potential for flooding
will be fully disclosed to all prospective buyers. The buyer
will be required to sign a document acknowledging disclosure and
agreeing not to request repurchase by the City.
.Based on previous advertising, approximately 30 people indicated
an interest in the property. Offers will be solicited from these
people based on the revised requirements. Several potential
buyers indicated an interest if offered "as is". If a
• satisfactory proposal is not received, advertising will again be
placed in appropriate newspapers. A closing is tentatively
scheduled for April assuming a buyer is readily identified in
February.
Recommended Motion:
1. Approve the attached transitory ordinance which authorizes
the Mayor and City Manager to effectuate a sale to the
successful bidder.
2. Approve the issuance of a Certificate of Completion by.the
City Manager at such time as the buyer has completed the
necessary repairs.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. To sell this property, the transitory ordinance must be
approved.
2. The Council has taken action directing staff to continue to
pursue sale of the property.
3. The notice of public hearing was published in the Sun-Current
on January 15, 1992.
4. Staff will monitor progress on code compliance and issue a
• Certificate of Completion when work has been completed.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Decide not to sell the house.
2. Delay action.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Adoption of the above noted motions will continue the sale
process.
ResVD. ully submitted,
JamProsser
Citager
JDP:ds
C?
C?, ?-
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE SALE, TRANSFER OR
OTHER DISPOSITION AND CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN CITY OWNED REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN,
STATE OF MINNESOTA (7300 FIRST AVENUE)
The City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1.
The following described real property located in the City of
Richfield, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, is hereby
authorized to be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of, and
conveyed by the City as herein provided:
The North 105 feet front and rear of the East 150.48
feet of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the North 10
acres of the South 20 acres of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 28, Range 24,
lying West of the West line of First Avenue South as
shown on the Plat of "Stevens Green 2nd Addition,"
Hennepin County, Minnesota, and having the street
address of 7300 First Avenue South, Richfield,
Minnesota.
is Section 2.
The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to take all
action as is required to sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of
and convey the real property described in the foregoing Section
1, including, by way of illustration and not limitation, the
execution of all documents, purchase agreements, deeds of
conveyance, and other instruments connected with such sale,
transfer or disposition and conveyance.
Passed this day of
Richfield City Council.
1992 by the
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
0
N
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 30
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement
Public hearing and second reading of the transitory ordinance
providing funding for certain capital improvements from the
Special Revenue Fund.
Background
At the January 13, 1992 City Council meeting, the 1992 Capital
Improvement Budget (CIB) was considered. The Proposed CIB
contains recommendations for expenditure for all types of funds
outlined in the budget document including county funds,
donations, municipal state aid, user fees, state grants, tax
increment financing, a transfer of $100,000 of General Fund
balance for Jefferson Park and special revenue.
While the total proposed 1992 CIB includes total budgeted
expenditures of $6,286,000, the portion of the CIB concerning
proposed funding from the Special Revenue Fund is $310,000. The
allocation of the $310,000 is outlined below:
Jefferson Park
• Taft Park Play Features
$300,000
10,000
$310,000
A transitory ordinance is necessary to finalize these
appropriations pursuant to City Charter. Charter Section 7.12,
Subdivision 2 allows expenditures for capital improvements from
the Special Revenue Fund only by ordinance.
First reading of the ordinance was approved on January 13, 1992
and a notice of public hearing was published on January 15, 1992.
Recommended Motion
Hold the public hearing and approve second reading of the
attached transitory ordinance providing for the expenditure of
funds from the Special Revenue Fund for certain capital
improvements.
Basis of Recommendation
1. On November 20, 1991, the City Council approved the 1992
CIB.
2. On January 13, 1992, first reading of the transitory
ordinance was approved.
3. Under Section 3.09 of the City Charter, a transitory
• ordinance becomes effective 30 days after publication of the
second hearing notice. The ordinance requirements must be
completed early enough in 1992 so that the capital projects
?-l
can be initiated on a timely basis, completed, and the funds
expended.
4. In order for the timely start of a number of projects under
consideration in the CIB, it is suggested that the second
reading and public hearing be completed at the January 27.,
1992 City Council meeting.
Alternative Recommendation
1. The City Council could continue the public hearing and
postpone second reading of the transitory ordinance to a
future City Council meeting.
2. The City Council could decide to authorize none or only a
portion of the expenditures identified from special revenues
in the CIB.
Discussion/Decision Mode
In order to proceed with improvements approved on a timely basis,
second reading approval of this transitory ordinance would be
desirable on January 27, 1992.
Respectf ly submitted,
• Jame Prosser
City anager
JDP:cak
0
. BILL NO.
TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MONEY FROM
THE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND FOR
CERTAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
City of Richfield Does Ordain:
Section 1: It is found and determined to be necessary and
expedient for the City to expend money from the Special Revenue
Fund for the making of capital improvements listed in Section 2
hereof, for which the City would be authorized to issue general
obligation bonds.
Section 2: The capital improvements and amounts of expenditures
for such improvements which are authorized to be paid from the
Special Revenue Fund under Section'7.12, Subdivision 2 of the
City Charter, are as follows:
Jefferson Park $300,000
Taft Park Play Features 10,000
Total 5310,000
40
Section 3: The expenditures herein authorized shall be made
pursuant to such contracts as are authorized from time to time by
Council action.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th
day of January, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsh
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber
City Clerk
Mayor
•
JH
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 29
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Purchase in excess of $5,000 for the 1991 Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) Water Appropriation Permit.
Background:
The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that
when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or
construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase
shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration.
The City of Richfield is required by state law to purchase a
Water Appropriation Permit yearly. The permit enables the City
to extract water for City use from seven deep wells. The fee is
based on total water usage; in 1991 a total of 1.33 billion
gallons was extracted from the City wells.
The fee for the permit is based on $4.50 per million gallons, so
the 1991 fee is $5,985.
Recommended Motion:
Approve a purchase order to the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources for the 1991 Water Appropriation Permit in the amount
of $5,985.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Minnesota State law requires each city to purchase a
Water Appropriation Permit for water extraction.
2. There is $6,500 allocated in the 1992 Water Maintenance
budget for the permit.
Alternative Recommendation :
None.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Staff requests approval at the January 27, 1992 Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
James Prosser
City nager
JDP:ds
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 28
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Purchase in excess of $5,000 for one Hansen Utility Management
Computer Software Program.
Background:
The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when
the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction
exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase shall be
submitted to the City Council for consideration.
The Utility Maintenance Divisions require a computer maintenance
program database for the purpose of tracking work orders, maintenance
schedules and histories, complaint records and as-builts. The
inventory information will be available to utility personnel for
emergency utility locations, preventive maintenance programs and
basic infrastructure data storage. A utility management computer
software program will resolve a difficult data storage and retrieval
problem. Two vendors were contacted for quotations with the
following results:
Hansen Software, Inc. $ 9,300
Macola, Inc. 12,145
• Hansen Software, Inc. submitted the lowest quotation. The purchase
price includes site licensing and database set-up.
Recommended Motion:
Approve a purchase order to Hansen Software, Inc. for one utility
management computer software program in the amount of $9,300.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Hansen Software, Inc. submitted the lowest quote for the complete
utility management computer software package.
2. There is a combined total of $10,000 in the Adopted 1992 Water
and Wastewater Divisions Capital Outlay budgets.
3. Use of this software will increase efficiency and effectiveness
of water utility operation.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may choose not to accept any of the quotations and instruct
staff to obtain new quotes. However, staff does not believe a better
price can be obtained for the desired computer software package.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Staff requests approval at the January 27, 1992 Council meeting.
• Res c ully submitted,
Jame . Prosser
Cit anager
JDP:ds
3rl"
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
• Council Letter No. 27
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Purchase of vehicle for use by Public Safety Department.
Background:
Unit #8.815, a 1988 Chevy Compact extended-cab pickup truck,
currently being used by the Public Safety Department, is fully
depreciated and scheduled to be replaced in 1992. Because this
vehicle is used both for personnel transportation and animal
patrol, Public Safety staff determined that a mini-van would be a
more useful and versatile replacement vehicle than another
extended cab pick-up. Purchase of the new vehicle has been
coordinated with the State of Minnesota's bid process.
The lowest responsible bid for the type of vehicle required was
submitted by Eggebrecht Chevrolet of Duluth at a total cost of
$15,296.75. The approved 1992 Central Garage Capital Outlay
budget contains $16,000 for this purchase.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the purchase of one 1992 Chevrolet Astro Minivan through
the State of Minnesota purchasing agreement, from Eggebrecht
Chevrolet of Duluth in the amount of $15,296.75.
• Basis of Recommendation:
1. Several manufacturers of utility vehicles were requested to
submit bids following predetermined specifications. Of the
bids submitted, Eggebrecht Chevrolet of Duluth was the lowest
responsible bidder for the type of vehicle requested.
2. There is sufficient funding in the Central Garage Capital
Outlay budget for this purchase.
3. The current vehicle requires replacement due to increasing
maintenance cost.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may choose to reject this bid and request staff to obtain
bids from other sources in an attempt to receive a lower purchase
price. However, staff does not believe a better price can be
obtained from a responsible dealer.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
In order to facilitate timely delivery of the vehicles, staff is
requesting approval at the January 27, 1992 Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
• Jame Prosser
City pager
JDP:ds
?r-
. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 26
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Purchase of vehicles for use by the Public Safety Department.
Background:
Five full size sedans being used by the Public Safety Department
are scheduled to be replaced in 1992. Purchase of new vehicles
has been coordinated with Hennepin County's bid process. All
five of the cars are currently in use. Four of the cars, Ford
Crown Victoria squads, were purchased in 1990 and will be fully
depreciated in 1992. The extent and nature of the use of these
cars indicates a two year replacement schedule. The fifth car, a
1987 Chevrolet Caprice, was used as the canine unit, and is also
fully depreciated.
The lowest responsible bid for the type of vehicle required was
submitted by Superior Ford, Inc. at a total cost of $63,950. The
proposed 1992 Central Garage Capital Outlay budget includes money
for these purchases.
Actual cost per marked squad car in 1990 was $13,091; actual bid
price per car in 1991 came to $12,946.50. The 1992 per car bid
price is $12,790. Staff does not believe a better price can be
. obtained other than through the Hennepin County bid process.
Recommended Motion:
Authorize the purchase of five Ford Crown Victoria full-sized
police sedans, plus one service manual (for $75), through the
joint Hennepin County purchasing agreement, from Superior Ford,
Inc. for a total purchase price of $64,025.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Several manufacturers of full size cars were requested to
submit bids following predetermined specifications. Of the
bids submitted, Superior Ford, Inc. was the lowest
responsible bidder for the type of car requested.
2. The City of Richfield is in need of replacing five fully
depreciated squad cars because of increasing maintenance
cost.
3. The replcement for the canine unit squad will be used to
increase the number of patrol squads. This reflects the
increase in number of "on street" police officers.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may choose to reject this bid and request staff to obtain
bids from other sources in an attempt to receive a lower purchase
price. However, staff does not believe a better price can be
obtained from a responsible dealer.
JC-I
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Time constraints dictate that in order to take advantage of the.
bid price, the dealer requires a letter of intent to purchase by
January 31, 1992. Staff is requesting approval of this purchase
at the January 27, 1992 Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
James Prosser
City ager
JDP:ds
0
0
3D
•
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 25
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Application for lawful gambling license for St. Peter's Church,
6730 Nicollet Avenue.
Background:
On January •16, 1992, the Church of St. Peter's submitted an
application for renewal of their lawful gambling license. The
application requests renewal for their bingo and pulltab
operations.
The applicant is proposing to conduct bingo on Tuesday's from
6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and at their annual Fall Festival which
will be held on September 12-13, 1992. The pulltabs would be
conducted in conjunction with the bingo operation.
The Public Safety Department has conducted the required
background investigation and has determined that the applicant
has complied with all requirements. In addition, the gambling
manager, Mr. Donald Jarvis, has no known criminal record.
Finally, the applicant is requesting that the $100.00
investigation fee be waived.
Richfield City Code 1100.13 requires the Public Safety Department
to review the request for the gambling license and make its
review and recommendation to the City Council.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends that the Council pass a resolution approving the
gambling activity requested by the-applicant inaccordance with
Richfield City Code 1100.13, subd. 6.
Staff further recommends that the Council waive the investigation
fee.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with the State Statutes and City
Code pertaining to lawful gambling.
2. The applicant has submitted the request within 60 days of the
renewal of the license.
3. The applicant has demonstrated.that the gambling activity
requested is a benefit to the community.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could pass a resolution specifically disapproving
• the renewal request, however, staff has determined that there
is no basis for this alternative.
3D-/
. 2. The Council could decide to not waive the investigative fee.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A request to approve of the renewal of St. Peter's lawful
gambling application and a request for waiver of the
investigative fee is submitted for City Council consideration at
this time.
Respect lly submitted,
Prosser
Jame La
City ger
JDP:ds
•
0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR
THE CHURCH OF ST. PETER'S TO CONDUCT LAWFUL GAMBLING
WHEREAS, the Church of St. Peter's has submitted an
application for renewal of their lawful gambling license; and
WHEREAS, the application request renewal for their bingo and
pulltab operations; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Section 349.213 provides
authority for review of applications by local authorities; and
WHEREAS, Section 1100.13 of the Richfield City Code provides
for regulation of lawful gambling; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Public Safety has completed an
investigation of the application and finds the application to be
in order;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council,
City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
• 1. That a lawful gambling license be granted to the Church
of St. Peter's, 6730 Nicollet Avenue.
2. That the investigation fee be waived.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota this 27th day of.January, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
1'1
U
?c
•
•
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 24
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Consideration of a resolution amending the 1992 General Fund Budget.
Background:
City Council directed staff to amend the 1992 Proposed Budget to
accomodate the cost of retaining the,1991 budgeted staffing levels for
the Fire Division. That cost is estimated to be $40,000. Council
directed staff to identify reductions within the General Fund to
accomodate this change. The proposed reductions are identified in the
recommended motion.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the budget changes as follows:
Line Item Description Amount . Impact
Public Safety:
4100-1130 Professional Decrease Reflects a slight decrease in
Services $ 3,800 costs for Nursing Contract.
4110-1010 Regular Decrease Represents salary difference
1035 Employees $22,700 between two officers who recently
left the City at step five pay
with college incentive vs. two new
officers at step one pay.
4120-1560 Equipment Decrease Replacement of some fire equipment
$ 2,000 items will be delayed.
4150-1100 Rents and Decrease None.
Leases $ 700
4150-1200 Communications Decrease None.
$ 500
4120-1010 Regular
Employees
Community Services:
4220-1010 Regular
Employees
Basis for Recommendation:
1. Council direction.
Increase Funds additional firefighter
$40,000 authorized by Council.
Decrease Reflects decrease due to personnel
$11,380 changes.
2. The proposed changes in the budget will not significantly impact
operations.
• 3. The firefighter position has already been filled. It is necessary
to provide budget changes to reflect this change.
Alternative Recommendation:
None.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This matter will be included on the consent agenda for the January 27
Council meeting. It should be noted that, by Charter, it is necessary
for four/fifths of the Council to approve this resolution.
Respect lly submitted,
Jame . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
•
0
•
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AMENDING 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY the Mayor and City Council of Richfield,
Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. That on November 20, 1991,the City Council considered
the adoption of the 1992 General Fund Budget.
Section 2. As part of that consideration. the Council did direct
staff to provide funding to retain the 1991 staffing level with the Fire
Division for 1992.
Section 3. That the City Manager has recommended the following
budget changes be adopted in order to accomodate that change:
Line Item Description
Public Safety
4100-1130 Professional
Services
4110-1010 Regular
1035 Employees
4120-1560 Equipment
Amount Impact
i
Decrease Reflects a slight decrease in
$ 3,800 costs for Nursing Contract.
Decrease Represents salary difference
$22,700 between two officers who recently
left the City at step five pay
with college incentive vs. two new
officers at step one pay.
Decrease Replacement of some fire equipment
$ 2,000 items will be delayed.
4150-1100 Rents and Decrease None.
Leases $ 700
4150-1200 Communications Decrease None.
$ 500
4120-1010 Regular Increase Funds additional firefighter
Employees $40,000 authorized by Council.
Communitv Services:
4220-1010 Regular Decrease Reflects decrease due to personnel
Employees $11,380 changes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this
27th day of January, 1992.
Martin J. Kirsch
ATTEST:
Mayor
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
28'
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No.23
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Amending resolution setting storm sewer utility rates for 1992.
Background:
During the•budget adoption process for 1992, utility rates.were
considered for the water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer
utilities. The rates were included in a resolution contained in
the City budget document and set for 1992. That resolution
contained a storm sewer utility rate of $7.75 per residential
unit per quarter for 1992, increased from $7.20 per residential
unit per quarter in 1991. The resolution also contained
commensurate increases for commercial and other categories of
properties for 1992.
Before making a recommendation on rates for the storm sewer
utility for 1992, a number of factors were considered including
the potential ILN area construction in 1992; the progress of the
construction project at 66th and Xerxes; and comparable rates in
the metro area for storm sewer utilities.
Based on information now available.to the City, staff recommends
that the City forego storm sewer rate increases for 1992, leaving
• the rates at the 1991 level. The level of construction activity
for 1992 will be considerably less than originally anticipated
and the year-end cash available in the storm sewer utility fund
for 1991 will be higher than expected. These two factors provide
an opportunity for the City to suspend the rate increase for one
year without affecting the financial performance of the fund.
The water and sanitary sewer funds were both increased for 1992
and as such, the level storm sewer rate for 1992 will provide
some relief in utility rate increases to Richfield customers,
especially commercial properties.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached resolution
resetting rates for the storm sewer utility for 1992 at no
increase from 1991.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The construction activity originally anticipated for 1992
will not occur at the level previously anticipated.
2. The construction activity that was expected to be paid for in
1991 also did not occur at the level previously anticipated,
leaving some cash balance carry over for 1992.
3. Based on a comparative rate survey of other communities which
• utilize a storm sewer utility, the City's rates for 1991 are
slightly higher than average and no increase for 1992 would
place the City in a position closer to the average for 1992.
3Q /
• Alternative Recommendation:
1. The City Council could decide not to modify the resolution
now in affect which does provide for a rate increase for the
storm sewer utility.
2. The City Council could elect to reduce the storm sewer
utility rates but not to such a degree as recommended in
this Council Letter.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
It is recommended the City Council take action to rescind the
rate increase for storm sewer utility at the January 27, 1992
meeting to allow City staff sufficient time to coordinate the
billing activities for 1992.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
Cit Manager
JDP:cak
•
i
0
44
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES,
WATER RATES.AND CHARGES,
SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES,
STORM SEWER RATES AND CHARGES
AND 5% PENALTY ON PAST DUE ACCOUNT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, as follows:
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1992
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.05 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
use and service of the sanitary sewer system are hereby established
to be those set forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution
which rescinds Resolution No. 7814:
2. Where the rate is not based upon the metered use of water,
the following quarterly flat charges are established effective
Janaury 1, 1992 for each billing district as defined in paragraph 3
of this resolution.
1992
• A) Residential per unit $20.50
B) Commercial -
For the equivalent of 10 or less persons $20.50
More than 10, less than 16 51.50
More than 15, less than 21 77.10
More than 20, less than 26 103.10
C) Institutional -
For each public or private school the quarterly flat
charge shall be charged whether the school is in session
session or not (rates being charged upon average yearly
use); shall be based upon the number of st udents enrolled
at the beginning of the quarterly billing period or the
preceding period if school is not then in session; and
shall be as follows:
1992
For each 100 grade school students or
fraction in excess thereof $37.10
For each 100 junior high school students o r
high school students or fraction there of 103.10
D) In addition to the above flat rates there shall be a
customer charge on each invoice as determined in
paragraph 4 of this resolution and a certifictation
• charge as determined in Section 7.05 of the City
Ordinance Code.
3? J
• 3. Where the rate for sanitary sewer service is based upon
the metered use of water on the premises, such rates shall be as
follows:
A) For all residential premises the rate shall be based on
the actual use, or less of water for the preceding.
winter quarter, per thousand gallons with minimum of
7,000 gallons, effective January 1, 1992, for each cus-
tomer billing district and shall be as follow:
1992
107cents
For the purpose of this paragraph A, the winter quarter
shall be the winter quarter specified in Subdivision 3
of said Section 7.05.
B) For all commercial, institutional, industrial, and
other premises, the rate per thousand gallons of water
effective January 1, 1992 shall be as follows:
1992
107 cents
C) A customer charge shall be made for each invoice
rendered effective January 1, 1992, as follows:
1991
$3.00
If the invoice is for water service, as well as
• sanitary sewer service, the customer charge, when
collected, shall be allocated proportionally between
the City's water fund, sewer fund and its storm sewer
fund based on the user fees billed for by each fund.
D) Where the metered use of water on the premises for the
proceding winter quarter was not normal, the rate may
be adjusted as provided in Subdivision 3 of said Sec-
tion 7.05.
4. The foregoing rates and charges are in addition to, and
not in lieu of, other rates and charges established by ordinance or
resolution.
WATER RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1992
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
city water and water service are hereby established to be those set
forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The charge due and payable to the City by each water
customer of the City, during any quarter shall be $1.26 per 1,000
gallons. Water charges shall be payable quarterly, and all bills
issued after January 1, 1992, shall be at this rate. These charges
• will cover, in some instances, water used during the months of
October, November and December, 1991.
.3e- Z/
U
•
0
SPECIAL WATER SERVICE CHARGES FOR 1992
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.15 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
special customer services are hereby established to be those set
forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The charge for establishing a new customer account shall
be $13.50 per account.
3. The charge for removal and reinstallation of outside meter
readers when physical modifications to the customer's property
necessitate such removal, and reinstallation, shall be $19.00 per
removal and reinstallation.
4. The charge to flush and maintain fire hydrants located on
privately owned property within the City shall be $39.00 per hydrant
per year.
5. The charge to thaw and service water pipes on customer
property shall be actual cost to the City plus thirty percent.
6. The charge for any other services not covered by the above
shall be based on actual hourly cost to the City, plus thirty
percent.
STORM SEWER RATES AND CHARGES FOR 1992
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.20 of the
Ordinance Code of the City of Richfield, the rates and charges for
city storm sewer service are hereby established to be- those set"
forth in the following paragraphs of this resolution:
2. The rates and charges for the use and availabilty of the
system are determined through the use of a "Residential Equivalent
Factor" (REF). One REF is defined as the ratio of the average
volume of surface runoff coming from one acre of land and subjected
to a.particular use,.to the average volume of runoff coming from one
acre of land subjected to typical single-family residential use
within the city during a standard one year rainfall event. The
REF's for the following land uses within the city and the billing
classifications for such land uses are as follows:
LAND USES
Cemeteries
Parks and Railroads
Two-family residential
Single-family residential
Public and private schools and
institutional uses
Multiple-family residential
uses and churches
Commercial, industrial and.
warehouse uses
REF CLASSFICATION
.25 1
.75 2
1.00 3
1.00 4
1.25 5
3.00 6
5.00 7
3. The basic system quarterly rate for storm sewer service is
$36.00 per acre of land. $7.20 is the quarterly rate for a single
family residence which is considered to have an acreage of one-fifth
acre. The charge made against each parcel of land is then
determined by multiplying the REF for the parcel's land use
classification times the parcel's acreage times the basic system
rate.
5% PENALTY OF PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
1. Customers will have thirty (30) days to pay their water,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer quarterly bills from the date of
mailing by the City. Any unpaid amount will be added to the next
quarterly bill along with a 5% penalty on the delinquent amount.
2. The penalty charge when billed on past due accounts shall
be allocated proportionally between the City's water fund, sewer
fund and its storm sewer fund based on the user fees billed for each
fund.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this
27th day of January, 1992.
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
0
3,4
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 22
Agenda January 27, 1992
Issue Statement:
Resolution amending established 1992 license, permit and
miscellaneous fees pursuant to provisions of Appendix D of the
City Ordinance Code.
Background:
As part of the budget adoption process each year, a resolution
which incorporates license and permit fees for the coming budget
year is adopted as part of the budget. During the course of the
1992 budget process, license and permit fee increases for
building permit related items such as heating, ventilating and
air conditioning, and refrigeration were inadvertently left at
the 1991 rates.
The proposed increases for those categories of permits for 1992
rates did not arrive in the Finance Division until after the
adoption of the budget. Thus, there is a need to amend the
resolution containing license and permit fees for 1992 to include
the fee increases for those categories. The proposed fees are
within the average charged by other municipalities for the same
licenses and permits.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt a resolution amending
miscellaneous fees pursuant
the City Ordinance Code.
established 1992 license, permit and
to the provisions of Appendix D of
Basis for Recommendation:
1. License and permit fee increases for certain building related
fees, including heating, ventilation and air conditioning,
were inadvertently omitted.
2. The information is now available and should be considered in
establishing 1992 fees which will recover the City's costs in
making such inspections.
3. There is still ample time to amend the resolution and
establish an appropriate 1992 fee schedule for these licenses
and permits.
4. It is necessary for the City to recover all of its costs of
inspections for each category of licenses and permits,
especially in light of the overall revenue cutbacks the City
of Richfield has experienced.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The City Council. could decide not to adopt the amended
resolution which would leave the 1991 rates in effect.
However, the City would not recover the cost of inspections.
3*1
• Discussion/Decision Mode:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the amended
resolution at the January 27,'1992;Council meeting in order to
implement the fees in a timely manner.
Respectfully submitted,
rosser
James Yapaer
City JDP:cak
C7
RESOLUTION NO. 3'?9_ 9
0
9
RESOLUTION AMENDING ESTABLISHED 1992 LICENSE,
PERMIT AND MISCELLANEOUS FEES
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF APPENDIX D OF
THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7819
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as. follows:
Section 1. Establishing Fees
A. License, permit and miscellaneous fees required under the ordinances of the City of Richfield shall be as stated in
the sections of this Resolution.
B. A period of no less than 30 days will be allowed for the remittance of City Business license renewal fees contained
in Sections 5,7, 8 and 9 of this resolution.
C. A 10% administrative surcharge will be assessed upon all renewals contained in Section 5, 7, 8 and 9 of the resolution
if not received by the City on or before December 31st of each year. The 10% surcharge will be based upon the cost of
the license.
D. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to require the City to issue or renew any license for which the fee has not
been paid in a timely manner.
Section 2. Construction and Related Permit Fees and Charges
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING TOTAL VALUATION FEE SCHEDULE
(1) Building 400.03-400.09 $ 1 $ 500 $15.00
Permits $ 501 $ 2,000 $15 plus $2 for each $100
or fraction thereof over $500
$ 2,001 $ 25,000 $45 plus $9.00 for each $1,000
or fraction thereof over $2,000
$ 25,001 $ 50,000 $252 plus $6.50 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $25,000
$ 50,001 $ 100,000 $414.50 plus $4.50 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $50,000
$ 100,001 $ 500,000
$ 500,001 $1,000,000
$1,000,001 and up
$639.50 plus $3.50 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $100,000
$2,039.50 plus $3.00 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $500,000
$3,539.50 plus 2.00 for
each $1,000 or fraction
thereof over $1,000,000
(2) Fire Extinquishing 400.03-400.09 Based on Building Permit fee schedule with a minimum of $20.00
System Permit
(3) Swimming 420 -Permanent above or below ground pools are based on Building Permit.
-Portable Pools $13.50
No fee shall be charged for construction or erection of any
pool 24 inches or less in depth at its deepest part and not
exceeding 177 sq. ft. in water surface area
(4) Plan 400.03-400.09 65% of building permit fee, except no fee for the following:
Review and State (a) Existing single family dwelling alterations when habitable
Fee Building code area is not enlarged.
(b) Single and two family dwelling repair and maintenance work.
(c) Commercial and industrial repair and maintenance
work not exceeding $1,000 or where plans are not required. -
(d) Residential garages and.storage buildings.
3t9--3
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
?4A) Contractors License Verification Fee
(5) Moving Dwellings 845 Pre-inspection Fee:
and Buildings other -IN Richfield
than Dwellings -OUTSIDE Richfield
Moving Permit Fee:
-WITHIN Richfield
-INTO Richfield
Moving Out of City
(6) Garage 845 Pre-inspection Fee:
Moving (if relocated in City)
Moving Permit Fee first stall
-Plus each adjoining stall
Moving out of City
(7) Structure Demolitian 400.00-400.09
(a) Commercial
(b) Dwelling
(8) Excavation in Public 800.01-800.15
Right of way
(9) Utility Abandonment
700.05
710.01
(9A) Certifcation Charge 705.03-705.21
(Delinquent)
(10) (a).Sewer 700.05
Construction
(b) Water Service 715.01
Service Connection
Demolition cost as per Building Permit Schedule with a minimum of
1. One or two story
2. Multiple First Unit
-plus each additional unit
3. Residential
-Garage and lesser structure
For each transverse excavation and
each 300 feet or portion thereof longitudinal excavation
Except when survey and grade stakes are set by City
(a) Sewer
(b) Water
Residential.
Industrial/Commercial
As per Ordinance
To connect to existing water service leads at the curb box
To connect to main where a curb box and service lead is not installed
the fee is the actual cost of material and estimated cost of labor.
To turn on water after discontinuance of service
FEE
$5.00
$35.00
$70.00
$35.00
$70.00
$35.00
$23.00
$16.00
$ 9.00
$16.00
$25.00
$22.00
$22.00
$10.00
$ 8.50
$20.00
$75.00
$11.00
$11.00
$20.00
$18.00
$26.00
$15.00
$15.00
For raising or lowering stop-box tops to correspond with ground level
change made by property owner. $20.00
(11) Plumbing Permit 400.03-.400.09 -Residential
(a) Minimum Fee $30.00
(b) Fee for each fixture including:
-Bath Tub -Laundry Tray
-Bidet -Lavatory
-Clothes Dryer -Sewage Ejector
-Dishwasher -Shower Stall
-Disposal -Sink
-Floor Drain -Water Closet
-Floor Tray -Water Heater (New or Replacement)
-Any Fixture Not listed $ 9.00
• Gas piping per unit including:
-Gas Grill -Gas Oven
-Gas Incinerator -Gas Plate
-Gas Stove -Gas Light $ 9.00
5 fi-
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
?11) Plumbing Permit(Con't.) (c) Lawn Sprinkler, AntiSyphon system (includes water
connnection from building piping and yard side of syphon breaker) $25.00
(d) Pool Heater (up to 199,000 BTU) $35.00
(e) Water Softner $ 9.50
(f) Water supply or distribution piping extension or alteration $ 9.50
(g) Sewer and Waste Alteration/Repair $ 9.50
(12) Plumbing Permit 400.03-400.09 Commercial
(a) Minimum Fee $40.00
(b) Fee per fixture including:
Plaster Interceptor, Bidet-Disposer, Drinking Fountain,
Floor Drain or Trap
Sinks:
Bradley type wash-up, Laboratory, Service-Counter, Flat/rim,
Pot or Scullery, Bar
Urinal - Water heater
Any fixture not listed above $10.00
(c) Clothes Dryer - 1-5 Units $25.00
Each Additional Unit $ 7.50
(d) Dental Chair $30.00
(e) Dishwasher $19.00
(f) Food Cold Case-Condensate Lines (each unit) $ 7.50
(g) Flammable Waste Trap - Catch Basin $19.00
(h) Ground run (new for existing building) $19.00
(i) Ice Making Machines $10.00
(j) Indirect coil for hot water storage $13.50
(k) Lawn Sprinkler, AntiSyphon System (Including water
connection from building piping to yard
side of syphon breaker) $38.00
(1) Neutralizing Tank $38.00
(m) Rainwater Leader:
All stacks 7 stories or less $19.00
All stacks over 7 stories $30.00
(n) Roof Area Drains: Each Drain $10:00
(o) Sewage Ejector $25.00
(p) Shower (gang type per head) $ 5.50
(q) Water softner $25.00
(r) Water supply or distribution piping, extension or alteration $19.00
(s) Sewer and Waste alteration/repair $19.00
(t) Installation of Gas Piping:
I. Up to 2" in diameter First 3 openings $ 9.00
Each additional opening $ 4.50
II. Exceeding 2" in diameter:
First 3 openings $20.00
Each additional opening $ 5.50
3f s
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
13) Plumbing Permit 400.03-400.09
?
Gas Unit (Burners)
Installation 99,000 BTU or less $ 13.50
100,000 - 199,000 BTU $ 19.00
200,000 - 399,000 BTU $ 33.00
400,000 - 599,000 BTU $ 49.00
600,000 - 999,999 BTU $ 64.00
1,000,000 - 2,499,000 BTU $109.00
2,500,000 - 9,999,000 BTU $129.00
10,000,000 - 49,999,000 BTU $183.00
50,000,000 - 74,999,000 BTU $233.00
more than - 74,999,000 BTU $306.00
(14) Plumbing 620
Permit Wells 2" Casing $13.50
3" Casing $16.00
4" Casing $21.00
5" Casing $37.00
6" Casing $49.00
Well Abandonment - Residential .$18.00
Well Abandonment - Commercial $36.00
(15) Electrical Permit 400.03-.400.09
Residential
(a) Minimum Fee $30.00
(b) Complete Wiring Fee:
Single Family Residence $55.00
Two Family Residence $106.00
(c) New Service - up to 200 amps $13.50
(d) Temporary Service - (for construction) $19.00
(e) Installation or replacement of each major appliance during
or after completion of building $ 9.00
(f) Swimming Pools $25.00
(g) Wiring of Addition:
First Room $13.50
Each Additional Room $ 6.50
(h) Rewiring
First Room $13.50
Each Additional Room $ 6.50
(i) Wiring for Residential Garages $13.50
(j) Furnace or Air Conditioning: Per Unit $ 9.00
(k) Electrical Heating System:
2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $19.00
(1) Electric (Infrared Heaters) Radiant: Per Unit $ 9.00
(m) Electric Baseboard Radiant Units: Per Unit $ 9.00
(n) Fire and intrusion alarms - 1-5 Stations $18.00
Each group of 10 additional stations or portion thereof $13.50
(o) Work requried to comply with minimum Housing Code provisions
. other than new service - 2% of contract cost with minimum of $18.00
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
?16) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Multiple Dwellings over two-family
(a) Minimum Fee $25.00
(b) Complete Wiring
2% of estimated job costs (includes
appliances at time of construction)
(c) Wiring or Garages First Stall $19.00
Each Additional Stall $ 4.50
(d) Temporary Service for Construction $19.00
(e) Swimming Pools $59.00
(f) Rewiring
First Unit $25.00
Each Additional Unit $13.50
(g) Furnace or Air Conditioner
Each Unit under 4 Tons $25.00
Each Unit 4 Tons or Over -
2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $25.00
(h) Electrical Heating System
(Central Type) 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $18.00
(i) Electrical Infrared Heaters (Radiant) Per Unit $ 9.00
(j) Electrical Baseboard Radiant Units Per Unit $ 9.00
• (k) Fire and Intrusion Alarms - 1-5 Stations $18.00
Each group of 10 Addt'l Stations or portion thereof $13.50
(17) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Commercial and Industrial
Minimum Fee $40.00
(a) Permanent Service: Based on total job cost
- 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $40.00
- Over $50,000 - Fee/ $1,000.00 plus 1 1/2% of cost over $50,000
(b) Temporary Services for Construction:
0-100 amps $19.00
100 + amps $30.00
(c) Traffic Signals: Per Intersection $185.00
(d) Elevators:
Per Elevator - Hydraulic $50.00
Per Elevator - Electric $100.00
(18) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Based on cost of Electrical Job to Customer
Signs - $0 - $100 $40.00
- $101 - $50,000 - 2% of estimated job cost with a minimum of $40.00
- Over $50,000 - Fee/ $1,000.00 plus 1 1/2% of cost over $50,000
(19) Electrical Permit 400.03-400.09 Telephone Booths: Wiring of Booth (includes company signs) $25.00
Is
3A-7
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
?20) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air
Conditioning and Refrigeration (a) Central System
1 1/2% estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(b) Additions, Alterations and Repairs
1 1/2% estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(c) Addition of Air Conditioning to existing heating systems
1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(d) Furnace or Boiler Replacement
1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(21) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air Conditioning
Ventilation and Exhaust Systems (a) Systems installed with central systems
1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(22) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration, Gas and Oil (a) Permit for installations or replacement of Conversion burner,
unit heater, floor furnace, wall heater-or space heater
Per unit with input of up to 99,000 BTU $13.00
1 1/2% of estimated cost of units exceeding 99,000 BTU
with per unit minimum of $30.00
(b) Gas Piping
Per unit for 1st five (5) units $ 4.50
Each additional unit $ 3.50
. (23) Heating, 400.03-.400.09
Ventilation,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration (a) Conversion from L.P. to natural gas
Each heating unit $ 7.50
Each minor appliance $ 5.50
With a minimum fee of $10.00
(24) Heating, 400.03-.400.09
Ventilation,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration (a) Process Equipment
(Installed of any steam, hot water or warm air system fired with gas
or oil used in connection with process application.)
1 1/2% of cost with a minimum of $30.00
(25) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilation,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration (a) Fuel storage Tanks (Underground or Enclosed)
Storage Tanks Installation to be used with oil burner only.
Per tank not exceeding 1,000 gal. $10.00
Per tank exceeding 1,000 gal. $20.00
(b) Fuel Storage Tanks (Above ground or not enclosed)
Installation to be used with oil burner only. Per tank $10.00
(c) Other Tanks (Installation modification, removal,abandonment)
Each above ground tank $30.00
Each below ground tank $80.00
For installation or alteration of piping $15.00
(26) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration Installation of stokers and/or power fuel burners
1 1/2% of job cost with minimum of $30.00
?/7
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
027) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating, Air Conditioning,
Refrigeration, Gas Fired Heating Gas Fired Infrared (radiant) Heater
First Unit $ 8.75
Additional Unit $ 6.50
(28) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration,
Refrigeration systems, Additions,
alterations and repairs 1 1/2% of estimated cost with a minimum of $30.00
(29) Heating, 400.03-400.09
Ventilating,
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration Installation, alteration, modification, relocation or replacement
of nonportable propane or LP or propane storage facility
Each tank $20.00
Each Vaporizer $10.00
Gas Piping $10.00
(30) Benches 805.01-805.27 First Year $21.00
Renewal $14.50
(31) Fire 400.21-400.29
Prevention Code For any fee required under code - per year $10.00
If not renewed within 2 months of notification add penalty of $12.00
(32) Sign 415.01-415.11
Installation 50 sq. ft. or less per year $25.00
Each additional 50 sq. ft. or less - per year $15.00
•
(a) Sign support structures based on Bldg. permit fee schedule
(33) Parking Areas 800.15-800.23 $ 8.00
(34) Housing 400.11-400.17 First Unit $75.00
Inspection Fee Additional Unit $25.00
This fee should apply to each inspection when:
1. Seller calls for minimum housing inspection
2. Homeowner calls for minimum housing inspection
3. House industry calls for minimum housing inspection
4. Government agencies call for minimum housing inspection
5. Private lending institution calls for minimum housing inspection
SECT ION 3. CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED LICENSE FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
(1) Heating and 400.07
Ventilating
Installer 1 Year $45.00
(2) Sign Installer 416.01-416.13 1 Year $40.00
(3) Electrical Installer 400.03-.400.09 State License Required
(4) Plumber 400.03-400.09 State License Required
(5) Well Driller 620 State License Required
(6) Tree Contractors 1197 $25.00
-3)9 ' q
SECTION 4. ZONING. LAND USE AND RELATED CHARGES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
• OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1)* Planned Unit 530' (a) $400 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a maximum fee of
Development (b) PUD Plan Amendment fee
(2)* C-3 Zoning District 520.35 (a) $300 plus $5 / $1,000 of project value to a maximum fee of
Site Plan Review (b) Plan Amendment Fee
Transitional Activity
Permit 520.57 $300 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a maximum fee of
(3)* Variance 545.05 Residential
Non Residential
(4)* Conditional 545.09 $400 plus $5/ $1,000 of project value up to a maximum fee of
Use Permit
(5)* Zoning District
Change 545.11
(6)* Subdivision Approval 500.01-500.05
Subdivision Waiver 500.05-Subd. 2
* Any additional expense of notification necessitated by applicants
request for continuance will be charged to applicant.
(7) Off-street
Parking Permit 545.09 (a) As part of conditional use permit process
800.15-800.23 (b) In conjunction with permitted use
. (8) Street Vacation 820
(9) Forestry Permit 810
SECTION 5. AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Arcade 1105
(2) Amusement 1100.01 (a) Mechanical Amusement Device (Pinball)
Device (b) Mechanical Music Box
(3) Lawful Gambling 1100.13
(4) Itinerant Place
of Amusement
(5) Public Dance
(c) Video Games Per Premise
1. 1-5 video games
2. 6-10 video games
3. over 10 games $150 plus each additional
Bingo, Tipboard, Paddle Wheel, Raffle, Pull Tabs
(a) Lawful Gambling Permit
(those exempt from State Licensure)
(State Statute 349.213)
(b) Lawful Gambling Investigative Fee
(State Statute 349.16) STATE LICENSE REQUIRED
1100.05-1100.11
1110.03 For each day dances are held -$2
No fee for locations holding tavern licenses.
1 Year
1 Year
1 Year
1 Year
1 Year
FEE
$3,000.00
$500.00
$3,000.00
$500.00
$3,000.00
$200.00
$400.00
$3,000.00
$450.00
$500.00
$450.00
No Fee
$200.00
$350.00
$ 10.00
FEE
$300.00
$45.00
$45.00
$100.00
$200.00
$10.00
1 year $100.00
1 year $100.00
1 day $150.00
$25.00 M0.
0
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE
(6) General
• Amusement
SECTION
REQUIRING
1100.03
(6a) Musical Concert 1110.01
(7) Theatre Cinema 1120
(8) Roller Rink 1115
(9) Commercial Adult- 605
Oriented Enterprises
(a) Billiard, Pool or Pigeonhole table (each) 1 year
1. Coin operated 1 year
(b) Bowling Alley (per lane) 1 year
(c) Circus 1 year
(d) Dance Hall 1 day
(e) Golf
1. Minature 1 year
2. Driving Tee 1 year
(f) Mountback 1 day
(g) Rides, mechanical or animal of any kind (each) 1 year
(h) Shows, any kind 1 day
(i) Shuffleboard (each lane) 1 year
(j) Other games 1 day
Per event
Plus a notice publication fee
1 year or portion thereof
Investigation fee
(10) Massage
Practitioner 605 Certificate fee
Investigation fee
(11) Public Baths 610
Investigation fee (actual cost minimum)
• (12) Fortune Teller 1130.05-1130.07
and related trade
SECTION 6. ANIMAL LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING
(1) Animals 905.01-905.29 (a) Dog
(b) Cat
(c) Duplicate
(d) Late Penalty
905.31-905.33 (e) Commercial Kennel
(f) Residential Kennel
905.37-905.39 (g) Pigeons
905.41 (h) Non-domestic Animals
905.01-905.29 (i) Impounding
0
1 year
1 Year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 year
1 day
1 week
1 month
1 year
i year
1 year
Either dog or cat
Each animal
1 year
1 year
1 year
Temporary Permit
each Animal
1st time
2nd Time
(& each impound after)
,a -io
FEE
$32.00
$90.00
$25.00
$129.00
$129.00
$30.00
$30.00
$124.00
$19.00
$124.00
$14.00
$63.00
$25.00
$124.00
$ 6.50
$124.00
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$50.00
$124.00
$1,737.00
$1,737.00
$100.00
$300.00
$600.00
$1,000.00
FEE
$9.00
$8.00
$5.50
$1.00
$150.00
$60.00
$30.00
$20.00
$25.00
$50.00
31?-1l
SECTION 7. VEHICLE AND TRANSPORTATION LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
0 OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
(1) Bicycle 1335 Minnesota State Registration
(2) Aircraft 1340 1 day $30.00
(3) Road Vehicle 615 (a) Bakery 1 year $70.00
(b) Catering - per year for first food vehicle $150.00
Per year - each additional vehicle under same ownership
and operation $65.00
(c) Readily perishable Same as (b) above
(4a) Garbage and Refuse
Collection 601.01-601.33 Per year for first vehicle $150.00
(Commercial and Residential) Each additional vehicle $32.00
(4b) Residential Waste 601.01-601.33 Recycling Collection Fee - per household per month 79t
Haulers
(5) Motor Vehicle
Dealer 1155 Per year first place of business $175.00
Per year - each additional place of buisness $65.00
(6) Motor Bicycle
Business 1160 Per year per place of business $129.00
Per year per place of business to sell, rent or lease $65.00
(7) Sound Truck 1165 1 year per vehicle $129.00
1 day per vehicle $20.00
•
(8) Taxicab 1170 Per year - first vehicle or auto livery $325.00
Per year - each additional vehicle or auto livery
operated at any time within license period $40.00
(9) Taxicab Driver 1175 1 year $30.00
(10) Rental or Utility 1185
Trailers and Trucks Per year each place of business $65.00
SECTION 8. COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AND TRADE LICENSES AND PERMITS
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
(1) Firearms Dealer 920.01-920.05 1 year $200.00
(2) Itinerant Food 615
Establishment 1 year $75.00
(3) Retail Candy 615 Per year - first facility $75.00
Shop Per year - each additional on same premises $20.00
(4) Food Establishment 615
(a) Retail or Wholesale Food Sales (Grocery) 1 year $200.00
(b) Restaurant (Prepackaged food only sold for consumption)1 year $200.00
(c) Restaurant (Prepared food sold for consumption) 1 year $375.00
• (d) Plan Review Fee (New/remodeled food preparation facility) $125.00
(e) Additional Food Facilities
(Baked goods, meat, produce, microwave ovens) Each $10.00
TYPE OF PERMIT
OR LICENSE
(5) Vending Machine
0
SECTION
REQUIRING
615
FEE
(a) Food vending machine requiring coin or token (excepting those
machines dispensing bottled or canned soft drinks) 1 year $15.00
(b) Other food vending machines (excepting those dispensing
bottled or canned soft drinks) 1 year $15.00
(c) Ice vending machine 1 year $15.00
Per calendar year or fraction thereof $100.00
Per year each vehicle $30.00
Permit fee for opening cesspool or dumping contects of each
cesspool into City sewer $15.00
1 year $30.00
(6) Automobile Washing
Establishment 1125
(7) Scavenger 600.25
(8) Incinerator
(9) Tobacco
(10) Soft drink
• (11) Transient
Merchant
(12) Wagon
Peddler
(13) Christmas
Tree Sales
(14) Motel
(15) Outdoor
Merchandising
(16) Storage
Enclosure
(17) Pawnbroker
and Secondhand
Goods Dealer
(18) Auto Detailing
0 Establishment
600.01-600.23
1145.03(MS 461.12)
Retail Sale and Distribution - per month or fraction
thereof License issued on calendar year basis (cigarette
vending machines prohibited, bill No. 1990-7 4-21-90) $30.00
1145.01
(a) Cans, bottles from shelf or cooler, fountain service $25.00
(b) Vending machine dispensing bottles or cans -0-
(c) Other vending machines 1 year $25.00
Per year or fraction thereof
per each additional machine $25.00
1181.01-1181.09 1 day $50.00
1181 1 year $150.00
1130.03 1 year $80.00
1190 First Unit $140.00
Per year each additional unit $ 9.00
1135
Permit $65.00
1135 Per Enclosure $56.00
1186 (a) Pawnbroker 1 year $1,500.00
(b) Secondhand Goods Dealer 1 year $300.00
(c) Initial investigation fee (nonrefundable) actual costs
in excess of above with total not exceeding $1,200.00
Applicant shall deposit $1,200.00 with City Clerk along with
application. Amount in excess of actual investigation
costs shall be refunded.
1195.01
1 year $225.00
,0-6
SECTION 9. LIQUOR AND RELATED LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF PERMIT SECTION
OR LICENSE REQUIRING FEE
?1) NonIntoxicating
Malt Liquor 1210 (a) On-Sale 1 year $550.00
(b) Tavern (dance) 1 year $450.00
(c) Wholesale 1 year $21.00
(d) Off-Sale 1 year $160.00
(e) Club (Bottle Club) 1 year $365.00
(2) Liquor
(3) Employee License
On-Sale Liquor
Establishments
(4) Investigation
Fee
1200.01-1200.25,
1200.29-1200.39 (a) On-Sale
1215 (b) Sunday (Fee set by state law)
1225 (c) Wine
1200.01-1200.25, (d) Veterans' Organization (Ex-Sunday)
1200.29-1200.39
1200.01-1200.25,
1200.29-1200.39
1200.01-1200.25,
1200.29-1200.39
1225
1200.09
SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS FEES
(1) Registration - 1181
(2) Permit to reside 1190
(3) License for 405.25
Apartment Houses and Rental Homes
1 year $11,200.00
l year $200.00
1 year $800.00
1 year $520.00
Per year/per person covered
Expires on June 30th
next following the effective date
(a) On-Sale liquor including Veterans' Organization
each person shown on application
actual costs in excess of above.
Each additional investigation for each person not
listed on original or renewal application.
(b) Wine - Original Application initial Fee
actual costs in excess of above
with total fee not to exceed
Renewal Application Initial Fee
actual costs in excess of above
with total cost not to exceed
Additional Investigation under 1200.09 Subdivision 3
not to exceed
Investigation of substitute manager
(a) State hawker or Peddler license
.6 month/per person covered
(b) Canvasser or Solicitor
6 month/per person covered
In motel for more than six months
(a) Apartment House (includes first 4 Units) 1 year
each additional unit in excess of 4
(b) Rental Home - 1 or 2 family dwelling l year
(c) Duplexes/double bungalows 1 year
per rental unit
(d) Late Fee
10% penalty for each month or portion thereof
during which said fee remains unpaid.
$ 21.00
$500.00 and
$150.00
$275,00 and
$2,107.00
$ 62.00 and
$2,107.00
$124.00 and
$2,107.00
$62.00
$25.00
$25.00
$15.00
$50.00
$ 7.50
$50.00
$50.00
•
(4) Certificate of 405.26
Housing maintenance
Compliance
(e) License Transfer Fee
(f) Reinstatement of suspended license
50% of license fee
(g) Reinstatement of Revoked license
100% of license fee
(a) Single family home or owner/occupied
portion of a 2-family home
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of January, 1992.
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
•
ip
Martin J. Kirsch
Mayor
$10.00
$50.00
0
g/ N-5,
•
?T
(33) Sign
Installation
AMENDMENTS TO 1992 APPENDIX D
1991 Fee 1992 Fee
(First 50 Sq. ft.) $20.00 $25.00
(Ea. Addtl. 50 Sq. ft.) $11.00 $15.00
(2) Sign Installer's License $35.00 $40.00
B m.nTNG'
"New Fee - Contractor's License Verification Fee - $5.00 (Per State of MN)
HRAa 1 AA1 FE±c?
(20) Htg, Vent, A/C
and Refrigeration
a) Central System 2% of Jobcost w/$24.00 Minimum
• b) Additions &
Alterations 2% of Jobcost w/$18.00 Minimum
c) Add A/C to
existing htg.
system 2$ of Jobcost w/$18.00 Minimum
d) Furnace or
Boiler
Replacement 1 1/4$ of Jobcost w/$18.00 Min.
1 1/2$ w/$30.00 Min.
1 1/2$ w/$30.00 Min.
1 1/2* w/$30.00 Min.
1 1/2$ w/$30.00 Min.
(21) Htg, Vent, A/C
& Exhaust Systems
a) Systems
installed with
Central Systems 2% of Jobcost w/$18.00 Minimum 1 1/2$ w/$30.00 Min.
0
jW%4
Page Two
Am ments
HRATTNQ
(22) Htg, Vent, A/C,
Refrig. Gas & Oil
a) Installation or
replacement of
conversion burner,
unit htr, wall or
space heater
1 (24)
? (25)
Exceeding 99,000 BTU's
1 1/4$ with $18.00 minimum
Htg, Vent, A/C
& Refrigeration
a) Process Equipment 2% of jobcost w/$18.00 Min.
Htg, Vent, A/C
& Refrigeration
c) Other Tanks
(Installation,
modification,
removal or
abandonment
--?a6) Htg, Vent, A/C
& Refrigeration
Installation of
stokers, and/or
power fuel burners
(28) Htg, Vent, A/C
& Refrigeration
Refrig. systems
additions, repairs
& alterations
1 1/2$ w/$30.00 Min.
1 1/2$ w/$30.00 Min.
Above Ground Tank - $25 Above Ground Tank - $30
Below Ground Tank - $70 Below Ground Tank - $80
2% of jobcost w/$13.50 Min. 1 1/2% w/$30.00 Min.
2% of jobcost w/$18.00 Min. 1 1/2 $ w/$30.00 Min.
0