5-10-93 agenda
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, MAY 10, 1993
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 26,
1993
PRESENTATIONS
1. OPPORTUNITY FOR PERSONS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT
LISTED ON THE AGENDA
2. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE FROM RICHFIELD DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SAFETY AND A CASH AWARD OF $300 FROM RICHFIELD CRIME
FUND TO RESIDENT MAUREEN FISCHER
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 141
3. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 19, 1993 CITY OF
RICHFIELD EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND FITNESS DAY
4. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING MAY 10-14, 1993
SMALL BUSINESS WEEK IN RICHFIELD
AGENDA APPROVAL
5. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE
ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT
CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND RECOMMENDED
ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS
NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM
BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR
AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON
THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.
6A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
FOR FENCING AT NEW MINIATURE GOLF COURSE AT VETERANS
MEMORIAL PARK OF RICHFIELD FROM STERLING FENCE, INC. FOR
TOTAL OF $5,698.82 C.L. 142
B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000
FOR TORO GREENSMASTER 3000 MOWER AT RICH ACRES GOLF COURSE
FROM MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. FOR TOTAL OF $9,728.78 C.L. 143
C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY
CELEBRATION EVENT LICENSE WITH FEE WAIVER BY FOURTH OF JULY
COMMITTEE FOR EVENTS SCHEDULED TO TAKE PLACE ON JULY 4, 1993
C.L. 144
D. ESTIMATE #3 PAYMENT FOR GARAGE MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS; CM
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.; $35,308.00
RESOLUTIONS
7. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS FOR 77TH STREET PROJECT IN THE
CITY OF RICHFIELD:
? APPROVING AGREEMENT NO. 70590 WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING 77TH STREET PROJECT
? AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
COSTS
? AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH U.S. WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
? AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN
UTILITY FORCE ACCOUNT WORK
? AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH BRW INC. FOR
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING FOR PHASE I
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 145
8. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR
JUNE 14, 1993 ON ESTABLISHMENT OF RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA AND MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREAS AND TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS (LHN, ILN, PASSS,
CABA AND RICHFIELD REDISCOVERED)
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 146
PROPOSED ORDINANCES
9. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING
RICHFIELD CITY CHARTER REGARDING BOND REFERENDUMS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 147
10. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
840 OF CITY CODE FOR REGULATION OF PUBLIC PARKS
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 148
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS & OTHER BUSINESS
AIRPORT BUSINESS
11. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT
CORRESPONDENCE
12. LEGISLATIVE REPORT
COUNCIL CHOICE
13. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS
14. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS
ADJOURNMENT
•
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available
upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance
to the Administrative Services Director at 861-9702.
•
f0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 148
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
First reading of an ordinance amending Section 840 of the City
Code for regulation of public parks.
Background:
The ordinance regulates the hours parks are closed, defines which
activities are permitted after closing and outlines a procedure
for a permit which allows exception to the regulations. The
proposed ordinance amendment retains the 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. hours
when the parks are closed, adds the miniature golf course to the
existing list of permitted activity, and requires groups,
associations and organizations wishing to sponsor an activity in
a public park apply for a permit. This will avoid duplication of
hours for scheduled activities, permit the City to better
maintain facilities, and groups, associations and organizations
will have a better understanding of when and where their
programming activities may take place.
First reading of the proposed ordinance change is scheduled for
May 10, 1993 and the public hearing and second reading are
scheduled for June 14, 1993. Residents, groups, associations and
organizations will be notified of any change in the ordinance
10 through various publications such as the Richfield Sun Current,
Your City & Schools, Status and Information Report, quarterly
brochure, cable television Bulletin Board, and the Park Pathways
newsletter.
Recommended Motion:
Approve first reading of the ordinance amendment to Section 840
of the City Code and schedule a public hearing and second reading
of the ordinance amendment for June 14, 1993.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Closing parks between the hours of 11 p.m. to 5 a.m. prevents
neighborhood disruptions.
2. When the Ice Arena has an opportunity to sell ice time during
the hours the park is closed, the existing ordinance permits
such extended hours. With the miniature golf course, it is
possible that play may extend slightly beyond 11 p.m. if some
players start late. Because, of the miniature golf course
location, there should be no disturbance to residents should
the course be used for a short period after 11 p.m.
3. Sometimes a group, association or organization wishes to
conduct an event during the hours parks are open. Because a
permit is not currently required, the City is not always
aware of these activities. By expanding the permit system,
there will be greater awareness of activities and improved
opportunity to work with the groups, associations and
organizations.
ro- I
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Do not amend the park ordinance. However, this may cause
continued confusion as to what activities are permitted in
public parks and when.
2. Provide additional amendments to the park ordinance.
However, this does not seem necessary at this time.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The Council should determine at the May 10, 1993 meeting what
amendments of the park ordinance are appropriate and schedule a
public hearing and second reading. It is suggested the public
hearing and second reading be no later than June so sufficient
notice of changes may be provided during the busy 1993 summer
season.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame Prosser
City anager
JDP:ds
Attachment
0
0
/C) -
BILL NO.
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER VIII, SECTION 840
OF THE CITY CODE OF
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter VIII, Section 840 of the Ordinance Code of the City
of Richfield is hereby amended in the following respects:
I. Subsection 840.03 is amended to read as follows:
840.03. Activities permitted after clog" - The
following activities may continue in the public parks
after the parks have closed:
(a) use of the indoor ice arena and use of the
miniature golf course;
(b) city sponsored and supervised activities, which
because of the nature of the activity, cannot be held
during the time when the parks are open;
(c) activities sponsored by any other group,
association or organization which has applied for and
received a permit for such activity pursuant to
subsection 840.05; and
(d) custodial or maintenance city and Hennepin
County authorized personnel who must perform their
services during the times when the parks are closed.
II. Subsection 840.05 is hereby amended by amending
subdivision 1 thereof to read as follows:
840.05. Permits. Subdivision 1. Procedure. A group,
association or organization wishing to sponsor any
activity which will use public parks between the hours of
31: ^eleek. p.m.-and5:00 l e-le k a? shall apply to
the city manager or his representative not less than ten
days two weeks before such planned activity for a permit
to conduct the activity. The application shall be on
forms prepared by the manager. Fees will be determined
annually during the budget process. No permit may be
issued unless the city manager determines that the
proposed activity:
(a) eoudet be-eendue ted--d'cciring heurs when the
• {-b-) ( a ) will not be likely to disturb the residents
of property surrounding the park;
lo-3
kc ) will not be likely to cause or create crowd
control or traffic or park maintenance problems; aiid
{-d4 (c) will not interfere with any other
activities previously scheduled for the park; and
(d) if requested between the hours of 11:00
o'clock p.m. and 5:00 o'clock a.m., could not be
conducted during hours when the park is open to the
public.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this
day of , 1993.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Ferber City Clerk
0
11
9
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 147
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Consideration of first reading of an ordinance amending the
Richfield City Charter regarding bond referendums.
Background:
The Charter Commission has recommended an amendment to the City
Charter. The amendment would provide that prior to deciding
whether to request voter approval of a bond referendum, the
Council must conduct one public hearing proceeded by notice
published in a newspaper. The purpose of the amendment would be
to assure that adequate public notice is provided regarding a
general obligation debt issue.
Recommended Motion:
Approve first reading of this ordinance and authorize a public
hearing and second reading scheduled for June 14, 1993.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. In order to gain public approval of debt offerings, it is
important that adequate public notice be provided.
2. The City has routinely provided public notice for debt
• offerings. The Charter requirement is, therefore, not
unusual or onerous.
3. It is sensible to provide adequate notice to the public prior
to a bond referendum.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council may decide to request that the Charter amendment
be submitted to voters for approval.
2. The Council may decide to recommend modifications to the
charter and send the question back to the Charter Commission.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This matter will be presented for action the May 10, 1993 City
Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Ja a D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
r?
APR 30 '93 09:34 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.Z
9-1
BILL NO. 1993-
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO
CITY GOVERNMENT : AMENDING THE
RICHFIELD CITY CHARTER
CITE' OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Background: Findin s : Authorit .
1.01. The City of Richfield (City) is governed by a home rule charter
adopted November 3, 1964, pursuant to the Constitution of the state of Minnesota
and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 410 (Act).
1.02. The Charter Commission of the City has proposed the adoption of an
amendment (Amendment) of the City Charter ("Charter") and recommended to the
City Council that the Amendment be adopted by City Council ordinance in the manner
prescribed by Section 410.12, Subdivision 7 of the Act. The form of the amendment
is set out in section 2.02.
1.03. A public hearing on the Amendment was duly held on
19,, by the City Council after two weeks' published notice containing the text of the
Amendment as required by the Act. The notice contained a brief description of the
nature and scope of the Amendment. All persons desiring to be heard with reference
to the Amendment were heard at the public hearing.
1.04 . The Council finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the
City and its inhabitants that the Amendment be adopted.
Sec. 2. Ad R Effective Date.
2.01. The Amendment, as proposed by the Commission, is adopted .
2.02. The text of the proposed amendment is as follows :
1. Chapter 7 of the Charter is amended:
By amending Section 7.14 thereof to read as follows:
Section 7.14. City indebtedness. Except as provided in Sections 7.15
and 7.16, no obligations shall be issued to pay current expenses, but the
Council may issue and sell obligations for any other municipal purpose in
accordance with law and within the limitations prescribed by law. Except in
the case of the obligations for which an election is not required by this
Charter or by state law, no such obligations shall be issued or sold without
the approval of the majority of the registered voters of the City voting on the
question at a general or special election. Before submitting a uestion to the
voters under this Section the Council must conduct at least one ublic
hearing on the question preceded by notice published in a news a er s
selected b the Council not more than 28 da s nor less than 14 da s rior to
' the hearing.
JW525$9
AC160-1
^ APR 30 '93 09:34 HOLMES & GRAVEN P,3
Sec. 2.03. This ordinance is effective ninety (90) days after its publication,
provided that if within sixty (60) days after publication a petition requesting a
referendum on this ordinance, signed by the number of registered voters of the City
required by the Act is filed with the City Clerk, this ordinance will not be effective
until approved by 51% of the voters voting on the question of its adoption at the
special election called by the Council for that purpose.
Sec. 2.04. On the effective date of the Amendment the City Clerk is
authorized and directed to file copies of the Amendment with the Secretary of State
of the State of Minnesota, the Hennepin County Recorder, and in the City Clerk's
office, together with the certificate required by Section 410.11 of the Act.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this _ day
of , 1993.
Martin J Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST
Thomas P . Ferber, City Clerk
•
All persons interested in this matter are hereby notified to be present and they will
be heard. Copies of the Charter amendment ordinance may be obtained at City Hall
or by calling 881-9700.
By Order of the City Council.
Thomas P. Ferber
City Clerk .
Publish: , 1993
JU52559
AC150-1 2
S
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 146
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Adoption of a resolution setting a public hearing,date for June
14, 1993 on the establishment of the Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area and modifications to existing redevelopment project
areas and tax increment districts (LHN, ILN, PASSS, CABA, and
Richfield Rediscovered).
Background:
At their April 19, 1993 meeting, the HRA adopted a resolution
requesting the City Council to schedule a public hearing on the
above stated project areas and tax increment districts. In
addition to the information presented in this letter,
representatives of Publicorp will be available at the May 10 City
Council meeting to answer questions.
By establishing the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area and
modifying existing projects and districts a concept known as
"pooling" could be implemented. The advantages of pooling
include:
1) Projects with strong cash flows can support, if necessary,
projects with a weaker cash flow.
• 2) Expenses may be reduced by lessening the need for bond sales
and possibly the need for additional tax increment districts.
3) Provide credit enhancements for bonds if and when sold.
The above advantages can be realized without extending the
scheduled bond debt retirement. Because of these advantages,
most cities utilizing tax increment financing incorporate this
pooling concept.
The attached document includes the Redevelopment Plan For
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area and modifications to all
existing projects.
Pooling would be established by placing all the existing
redevelopment and tax increment districts in one redevelopment
district, the proposed name is the Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area. The boundary generally conforms to the existing
redevelopment project boundary for Richfield Rediscovered and
also includes existing projects. The southeast quadrant of
Richfield has been added, as have the locations of the larger
apartment developments which were outside existing boundaries.
No existing project boundaries are being changed. The inclusion
of this southeast area would be prudent for long range planning
purposes. The inclusion of apartments could facilitate future
improvements to these properties. Note the maps in the
redevelopment project area plan, Appendix A page A-2, and
Appendix B page B-2.
3'1
• The Richfield Redevelopment Plan is basically a compilation of
previously approved redevelopment plans (ILN, LHN, PASSS, CABA
and Richfield Rediscovered A and B). Note the Table of Contents.
? Page 3 is a Statement of Public Purpose and explains the basis
for creating the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area.
? Goals and Objectives are listed on pages 4-6.
? Page 6 also lists anticipated public activities and page 8
lists anticipated private development activities. .
? Pages 10-22 are the amendments to the existing redevelopment
and tax increment areas which would effectuate pooling.
? On page 12 is a proposed modification to the ILN Tax Increment
District. The modification would delete from the tax
increment district the Corporate Travel property on 76th
Street and Girard Avenue. The market value has dropped from
$3.6 million in 1985 to $1.8 million for taxes payable in
1993. (The plan identifies the value drop by use of tax
capacity.) It is unlikely that this property will return to
its previous valuation. The project cash flow would benefit
from this deletion by approximately $125,000.
Amendments to each of the redevelopment plans and tax increment
• plans must be approved concurrently with the Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area Plan to establish the Richfield
Redevelopment Project to implement the pooling.
The resolution which follows, would schedule the City Council to
hold a public hearing on June 14, 1993 on the proposed plan
amendments and the establishment of the Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area.
The proposed schedule for implementing the pooling concept is as
follows:
4/19/93 HRA adopts resolution requesting the City Council to
schedule a hearing on June 14, 1993 for purposes of
establishing the Richfield Redevelopment,Project Area
and amending the existing plans.
5/10/93 City Council meeting at which request of HRA for a
public hearing on June 14 is presented for action.
(This is not plan approval action, merely setting a
hearing date.)
5/17/93 HRA requested to approve project plan modifications and
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area Plan.
• 5/25/93 Planning Commission requested to make a finding with
regards to plan modifications and Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area Plan and their compliance
with the Comprehensive Plan.
S-C).
6/14/93 City Council public hearing on plan amendments and
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area Plan followed by
consideration to approve them.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt a motion which approves the resolution establishing the
public hearing date as June 14, 1993.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Pooling of tax increment project would:
a. strengthen the cash flows of all existing tax increment
projects with debt service;
b. increase the possibility of credit enhancements for
future projects which may require them; and
c. reduce operating expenses related to tax increment
projects.
2. Pooling can be implemented without lengthening the debt
service schedules of any projects.
3. Pooling is a good fiscal tool for prudent management of tax
increment cash flows.
• 4. The pooling proposal is consistent with state laws.
5. Neither of the proposals is in conflict with the five point
policy adopted by the HRA several years ago (attached).
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Modify the recommendation.
2. Delay proposed action.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This proposal is presented for consideration in response to the
action taken by the HRA in April.
ResprcV'gully submitted,
Ci
JDP:ds
Attachments
s IV. Prosser
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD,
0 3-
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF RICHFIELD
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA, THE MODIFICATION OF
CERTAIN PROJECT AREAS AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICTS AND ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATED THERETO
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Richfield
(the "HRA") has requested that the Council call for a public hearing for the
establishment of Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the modifications to
the Lyndale-Hub-Nicollet Redevelopment. Project Area, the Interstate-
Lyndale-Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area and the Interstate-Lyndale-
• Nicollet Tax Increment Financing District, the Cedar Avenue Business Area
Redevelopment Project Area and the Cedar Avenue Business Area Tax
Increment Financing District, the Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street
Redevelopment Project Area and Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street Tax
Increment Financing District, Redevelopment Project Area A and Tax
Increment Financing District A-1 and Tax Increment Financing District A-2,
and Redevelopment Project Area B and Tax Increment Financing District 13-
1 and Tax Increment Financing District B-2 (collectively the "Project Areas"
and "Tax Increment Financing Districts") and the adoption of Redevelopment
Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto.
1.02 The Council finds that the goals and objectives found in the Redevelopment
Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plans are worthy of consideration of the
public and the Council.
Section 2. Council Approval.
2.01 This Council shall meet on Monday, June 14, 1993, at approximately 7:00
p.m., at City Hall to hold a public hearing on the proposed establishment of
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the modifications to the Lyndale-Hub-
Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area, the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet
• Redevelopment Project Area and the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet Tax
Increment Financing District, the Cedar Avenue Business Area
Redevelopment Project Area and the Cedar Avenue Business Area Tax
Increment Financing District, the Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street
Redevelopment Project Area and Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street Tax
Increment Financing District, Redevelopment Project Area A and Tax
Increment Financing District A-1 and Tax Increment Financing District A-2,
and Redevelopment Project Area B and Tax Increment Financing District 13-
1 and Tax Increment. Financing District B-2 (collectively the "Project Areas"
and "Tax Increment Financing Districts") and the adoption of Redevelopment
Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto. all pursuant to
and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through
469.047, as amended and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through
469.179, inclusive as amended.
2.02 The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A together with an
appropriate map as required by law to be published in a newspaper of
general circulation in the City at least 10 but no more than 30 days before
the date of the hearings, and to place a copy of the Redevelopment Plans
and Tax Increment Financing Plans on file in the office Community
Development at City Hall, to make such copy available for inspection by the
public, and to transmit the Redevelopment Plans and Tax Increment
Financing Plans to the School Board of School District No. 280, School
. Board of School District No. 287, the County Board of Hennepin County,
and the Planning Commission of the City of Richfield.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of
May , 1993
ADOPTED:
ATTEST:
Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
U
S-S
EXHIBIT. A
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 14, 1993
7:00 P.M.
Notice is hereby given that the Richfield City Council will meet and conduct public
hearings on Monday, June 14, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Richfield
City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue South.
The purpose of these public hearings are to receive oral or written opinions on the
establishment of Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, the modifications to the Lyndale-
Hub-Nicollet Redevelopment Project Area, the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet Redevelopment
Project Area and the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet Tax Increment Financing District, the
Cedar Avenue Business Area Redevelopment Project Area and the Cedar Avenue
Business Area Tax Increment Financing District, the Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street
Redevelopment Project Area and Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street Tax Increment
Financing District, Redevelopment Project Area A and Tax Increment Financing District
A-1 and Tax Increment Financing District A-2, and Redevelopment Project Area B and Tax
Increment Financing District B-1 and Tax Increment Financing District B-2 (collectively the
"Project Areas" and "Tax Increment Financing Districts") and the adoption of
• Redevelopment Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto.
The objectives of the establishment of the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area
and the modification to the Project Areas are to enable tax increments to be shared
among the Project Areas and to add additional blighted areas previously not included in
the Project Areas.
Copies of the Redevelopment. Plans and Tax Increment Financing Plans will be
available for public review in the Community Development Department at City Hall prior
to the public hearings.
The attached map depicts the boundaries of the Project Areas and the Tax
Increment Financing Districts.
All persons interested will be heard orally or in writing.
By order of the City Council
Thomas P. Ferber
• City Clerk
PUBLISH: June 2-, 1993
C
' - ! a tL ! os
IPA f: Oz
Nf10"at r?? ? f T. V
`- Jl. .-JI. 11 W
1.17 ( ri Ci G G !r G ri Ci G: _
! t t =
Ise
r1.1 r[f?L?C JJI a I? i. .?. ?.\ w k R?
Q lan71?M01 ___S? --- -- AYn,7lfMO1
.7Ar Yr033 :'- 3Ar W033
:: I? ::•::•
I
a -its, risl
0 -'
NO1OM1 NOl•NII10o1f
.'• ? • . • •
W rl f `:: I?oo %I to
R: F.
rir
..?? O Q00 rirl i
a F r/ f d pv ?(?0 w EI
"lei
Q v oil ri n
1f
- ?0
t
N
> I
rl
r1 of I •. 01 Q
aonn I = W a~ 8 lonl) m
folooll,
V o•r31N3II Y +? OOQ O0r31N3 m
W W fn•wmw frnwmoa Q
'O
? r ? I o :: ??C7 •N.,llr0 Q
.. . '19n r
a
1Ar ONr11Y0d *JAW oNruwd
rIf ' E ` rIS Q) m
.. p ;oollow
rir ! 0 ? ? ?'.•. rir '-+ V
W Pit ?0 _- MotNn3 a a
?C - ea
- .If
N7
pot O.. ..• . ?Y?
I?
V?
9013A71f C
Z Z lO Z fM7113" .. • •
X.X? PI
O` 1A. 1711071N ••?e's'''''1 • • • • • 'lA1 17110)IM A
Z 1170f1r1• I ? I ?O .. .;• 1: .-.-• 1 :':':':':••`?'? ? 1,30fnn• Q
I •' 'O ? N1?Of11M3? -? C
L NallorlN7 r
a -
Now, AYnis"oo III ?? - - - .' AYn•f„Id ' LL foo
a 0
- iNrfr37d ; 't:}4•:T.!7': -L ...... iNtft3ld 0 OW
.J W oNr»f III 2ONr»• C
W Z I? ....: m d
W 131YYtN 131YY1N
.:
0131d»rf Intl ;: > :?< 0131dYrs m
S ::': ir::rio:•:;
i? ....r:::•:
.............
7Ar 71rONA, ? .:::: i:: ??•. QG{'r'r} - 3M 31rONA,
:.::::.....
W 6,131100110 1431111411V
, .. ....
-
1NtAY• II ?'?w%•?:?•: .•• 1NrAW .f-
_ W J ti>..:: t x
xrsloa .I xrslm V
1MOdrn ? ::::',.y;>:->:': p s 1Modn0 ..
W V ° W ?-
MOfY3w3 ! ".;;;' NOfY3w7
Z ANDPOU
W -
1o1o•wnN ? ?' ' ' ' ''•'aolo•wnN
p x
W W o"IAYI (''''???^{??'''''^'77,?[[ `? I •• _ ??? •NIAYI ;
xON» ' F-•.•-•-•l iV'''•'? ' .. •. Q •.'.'.'• I ` )COMM
1 t '•'•'•' :•:•:•: .:•:•.• I?
$$wool "viol
Mr•YOw • " Mr OYOw
MOlA13M
.... .... ..
. '7Ar "M)d {.??t ...... -'W 'JAW N%3d
M33110':11t..::`''`N'•: » y of
•• r 1
3ffnY ......
„ 1113Lf0Y
"VOIY7Nf "-J???- V•''"''' "r01113Mf
frwONl r-- (L-LLLJ"'?'O1.•. ??T..- :.•???7, ,.••?? .•.•.• : ,I; fr110N1
I - 1N33NIA
NYn•Mfr1f I .? d" •.' M
NYnpfr1Y
',AV 1113x113x J ??- ' ?? 1 • • • -_- _-__• _ - JAW 93XY3x
?1 ril rll N ? ? Ih ad
d r11 N ? rll ? ? F ril ? rli
• c
11 9 I+
3 S S r i tl R s 1$- " w w ?:
v
H
B-2
8-7
• COUNCIL POLICIES WHEN ISSUING
TAX INCREMENT BONDS
1. The multi-family project, home improvement
• center, Richfield Bank,and Trust project
and promotional department store project
be completed by separate developers.
2. The bond issue should be divided into stages.
3. Surety bonds for project completion must be
retained from each developer.
• 4. Bond's must not be sold or land assembled
until a definite financial ccmmitment is
obtained from the developer.
5. Speedy site assembly (property purchase
relocation and demolition) must be completed
by the HRA once a developer is committed.to
the project.
0
g-8
• REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
and
MODIFICATIONS TO THE
-LHN COMMERCIAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
for
LHN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
ILN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for ILN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
including the
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for ILN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for CABA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
including the
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for CABA TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for PASSS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
including the
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for PASSS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA A
• including the
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for A-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for A-2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA B
including the
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for B-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
_ and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for B-2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
RICHFIELD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
in and for the
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
HRA Adoption:
May 17, 1993
City Council Adoption:
June 14, 1993
r:
g- 9
MAYOR
• Martin Kirsch
CITY COUNCIL
Michael Sandahl
Susan Rosenberg
Russ Susag
Donald. Priebe
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Thomas Harms
Russ Susag
Joan Helmberger
Vern Luettinger'
Larry Wozniczka
PLANNING COMMISSION
Robert Elliott
Timothy Erlander
Michael Gallagher
Daniel Linnihan
Morris Nilsen, II
• Thomas Scaglia
William Snyder
Kristal Stokes
Paul Wasko
CITY MANAGER/HRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
James Prosser
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Byron Wallace, Director
Bruce Palmborg, Housing and Redevelopment Coordinator
Kathy Jablonsky, Redevelopment Specialist
HRA ATTORNEYS
John Dean, Holmes & Graven
Steven Bubul, Holmes & Graven
HRA FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS
Sidney Inman, Publicorp, Inc.
Mark Ruff, Publicorp, Inc.
:?,/o
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Municipal Action Taken ............................................................................................ i
Definitions .............................................................................................................. 1
Statement of Public Purpose .... .............................................................................. 3
Statutory Authority .................................................................................................. 4
Statement of Goals and Objectives ............................................................................ 4
Estimated Public Costs ............................................................................................. 6
Boundary of Richfield Project Area ............................................................................. 7
Parcels in Acquisition and Relocation ......................................................................... 7
Environmental Considerations ................................................................................... 7
Proposed Land Use ..........:....................................................................................... 7
Development Activity in Richfield Project Area ............................................................ 8
Administration and Maintenance -of Richfield Project Area ............................................. 8
Richfield Project Area Modifications ........................................................................... 9
Modification to LHN Redevelopment Project Area ...................................................... 11
Modification to ILN Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Plan........ 12
Modification to CABA Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Plan ..... 14
Modification to PASSS Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Plan ...16
Modification to Redevelopment Project Area A and.Tax Increment Financing Plans......... 18
Modification to Redevelopment Project Area B and Tax Increment Financing Plans......... 20
Appendix A: Richfield Project Area Map and Description ...............................................A
Appendix B: Tax Increment Districts and Project Areas Map ......................................... B
S-1/
0
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area
Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Project Area attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council of the City of
Richfield and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Richfield and for the
purpose of fulfilling the City's redevelopment goals and objectives the City Council established
Richfield Project Area pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended.
The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith:
June 14, 1993: The Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area was
adopted by the City Council.
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Lyndale-Hub-Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Project Area
October 15,1975: The Commercial Improvement Program for the LHN Redevelopment
Project Area was adopted by the City Council.
• November 24, 1975: The Commercial Improvement Program for the' LHN
Redevelopment Project Area was modified by the City Council.
March 26, 1979: The Commercial Improvement Program for the LHN Redevelopment
Project Area was modified by the City Council.
December 17, 1990: The Commercial Improvement Program for the LHN
Redevelopment Project Area was modified by the City Council.
June 14, 1993: The Commercial Improvement Program for the LHN Redevelopment
Project Area was modified by the City Council.
0
9 -/ C; ?
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment Project Area
October 21, 1985: The Redevelopment Plan for the ILN Redevelopment Project Area
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment Financing District
were adopted by the City Council
September 18, 1989: The Redevelopment Plan for the ILN Redevelopment Project Area
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment Financing District
were modified by the City Council.
June 14, 1993: The Redevelopment Plan for the ILN Redevelopment Project Area and
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment Financing District were
modified by the City Council
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Cedar Avenue Business Areas (CABA) Redevelopment Project Area
October 21,1985: The Redevelopment Plan for the CABA Redevelopment Project Area
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the CABA Tax Increment Financing District
were adopted by the City Council.
• June 14, 1993: The Redevelopment Plan for the CABA Redevelopment Project Area
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the CABA Tax Increment Financing District
were modified by the City Council.
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street (PASSS) Redevelopment Project Area
December 18, 1989: The Redevelopment Plan for the PASSS Redevelopment Project
Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the PASSS Tax Increment Financing
District were adopted by the City Council.
June 14, 1993: The Redevelopment Plan for the PASSS Redevelopment Project Area
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the PASSS Tax Increment Financing District
were modified by the City Council.
91? 3
0
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Redevelopment Project Area A
July 23,1990: The Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area A and the
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing District A-1 were
adopted by the City Council.
August 24, 1992: The Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area A and
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing District A-1 were
modified by the City Council and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District A-2 was adopted by the City Council.
June 14, 1993: The Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area A and
the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing District A-1 and
Tax Increment Financing District A-2 were modified by the City Council.
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Redevelopment Project Area B
July 23, 1990: The Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area B and the
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing District B-1 were
adopted by the City Council
• August 24, 1992: The Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area B and
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the. Tax Increment Financing District B-1 were
modified by the City Council and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District B-2 was adopted by the City Council.
June 14, 1993: The Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area B and
the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing District B-1 and
Tax Increment Financing District B-2 were modified by the City Council.
0
8-/ w
0 A. Definitions.
The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Development Program, have the meanings
herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires:
"CABA Redevelopment Project Area" means the Cedar Avenue Business Area .
Redevelopment Project Area as modified.
"City" means the City of Richfield, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of
the State of Minnesota designated as a home rule charter city.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the documents which contain the objectives, policies,
standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, development and
preservation for all lands and water within the City.
"Council" means the City Council of the City, also referred to as the governing body.
(See "Governing Body" below).
"County" means the County of Hennepin, Minnesota.
"Governing Body" means the duly elected City Council.
"HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield.
"HRA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047, as amended.
"ILN Redevelopment Project Area" means the Interstate-Lyndale-Nicol let
Redevelopment Project Area as modified.
"LHN Redevelopment Project Area" means the Lyndale-Hub-Nicollet Redevelopment
Project Area established by the Council as modified.
"Municipality" means any city, however organized as defined in Minnesota Statutes
Section 469.125, Subdivision 2.
"PASSS Redevelopment Project Area" means the Penn Avenue and Sixty Sixth Street
Redevelopment Project Area as modified.
"Richfield Project Area" means the Richfield Redevelopment Project established by the
Council on June 14, 1993.
"Redevelopment Plans" means the Commercial Improvement Program for the LHN
Redevelopment Project Area and the Redevelopment Plans for the ILN Redevelopment Project
Area, the CABA Redevelopment Project Area, the PASSS Redevelopment Project Area,
Redevelopment Project Area A and Redevelopment Project Area B..
i
3--150
"Redevelopment Project Areas" means the LHN Redevelopment Project Area,
the ILN Redevelopment Project Area, the CABA Redevelopment Project Area, the PASSS
Redevelopment Project Area, Redevelopment Project Area A and Redevelopment Project Area
B.
"Richfield Redevelopment Plan" means the Richfield Plan adopted by the City on June
14, 1993.
"School District" means Independent School District No. 280.
"State means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Financing Districts" means the LHN Redevelopment Project Area, the
ILN Redevelopment Project Area, the CABA Tax Increment Financing District, the PASSS Tax
Increment Financing District, Tax Increment Financing District A-1, Tax Increment Financing
District A-2, Tax Increment Financing District B-1, and Tax.lncrement Financing District B-2.
"Tax Increment Financing Plans" means the Commercial Improvement Plan for the LHN
Redevelopment Project Area, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment
Financing District, the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the CABA Tax Increment Financing
District, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the PASSS Tax Increment Financing District,
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-1, the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-2, Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Financing District B-1, and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District B-2.
"Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.174 - 469.179, inclusive, as amended.
B. • Statement of Public Puroose.
The HRA has found that public interest requires the replanning and rehabilitation of residential
and commercial neighborhoods across the City to remedy conditions of underutilized land, to
correct numerous traffic and pedestrian hazards, to improve substandard and unsafe housing
units, to increase the property tax base, to increase employment, and to encourage the
expansion of private enterprise. To these ends, the HRA and the Council from 1975 to 1990
established and modified from time to time six individual Redevelopment Project Areas to
enhance the public interest and accomplish goals and objectives set forth in the
Redevelopment Plans.
Given the geographical separation of the Redevelopment Project Areas, the HRA finds cause
to explore opportunities to more effectively address the public interest. These opportunities
include developing a more efficient method of financing public costs and assisting in the
development and redevelopment by private enterprise unimpeded by individual Redevelopment
Project Areas' boundaries. The HRA finds that it is necessary to facilitate the flow of funds
into areas of the City which are in need of public intervention but previously had little or no
resources available.
The HRA has also determined that there exists areas of the City not included in one of the
Redevelopment Project Areas in which needs are not being served and for which funds are
not currently available. These areas include buildings or improvements which, by reason of
dilapidation, obsolescence, overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation,
light and sanitary facilities, excessive land coverage, deleterious land use, or obsolete layout,
or any combination of these or other factors, are detrimental to the safety, health, morals or
• welfare of the City.
The HRA has further determined that the welfare of the City requires active promotion,
attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce
through government action for the purpose of preventing the emergence of blight and the
occurrence of conditions requiring redevelopment.
Therefore, the HRA has determined that the it is necessary to establish the Richfield Project
Area which would encompass existing Redevelopment Project Areas as well as include
portions of the City previously not included. Funds for redevelopment and development could
therefore be targeted to specific needs without geographical barriers. Potential funding
sources include, but are not limited to, tax increments, federal grants and loans, state grants
and loans, interest earnings, land sale proceeds, development accounts, and other local
resources.
The establishment of the Richfield Project Area does not replace the existing Redevelopment
Areas, does not include the establishment of a new tax increment financing district, nor does
it extend the duration of existing Tax Increment Financing Districts. Instead, the
establishment of the Richfield Project Area will serve as an umbrella entity. Therefore, costs
of financing redevelopment activities will be reduced and areas of the City previously outside
the HRA's area of operation will be included.
?, 1?
C. Statutory Authority
The statutory authority for the undertaking of a redevelopment project and the activities
proposed in the redevelopment plan relating thereto is conferred upon the HRA pursuant to
and in accordance with the HRA Act. Specifically, Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.027
establishes the requirements for 'the redevelopment plan preparation by an HRA prior to the
undertaking of property acquisition, redevelopment, development and other related
improvements.
D. Statement of Goals and Obiectives.
The HRA determines that the establishment of the Richfield Project Area and the modification
of Redevelopment Project Areas and Tax Increment Financing Districts will provide the HRA
with the ability to achieve certain public purpose objectives not otherwise obtainable in the
foreseeable future without HRA intervention in the normal development process. The HRA
and Council seek to achieve the following goals and objectives:
Goals:
1. To provide a revenue base to meet the needs of Richfield.
2. To develop job opportunities for area residents.
3. To develop strategies to encourage revitalization.
• 4. To maintain a positive business environment.
5. To enrich the quality of life for residents through planning of the
interrelationship of land use.
6. To recognize the needs of all segments of the populace through diversity in
housing stock which is a major determinant of the living environment.
Objectives:
1. To achieve a high level of design quality through use of design features such
as landscaping to enhance the physical environment.
2. To better utilize vacant or underdeveloped land.
3. To improve vehicular circulation by providing a comprehensive system which
provides good. direct access to and from the commercial areas. To the extent
practical, eliminate commercial traffic from
residential streets and minimize vehicular circulation conflicts or congestion.
4. To achieve a balanced variety of commercial businesses. and services
appropriate to the market area.
5. To provide increased employment opportunities.
4
g-18
6. To'diversify the tax base of the community.
7. To eliminate or reduce the conflicts which result from incompatible land use
relationships, especially between residential and non-residential.
8. To protect the single-family residences from the adverse effects of nearby
commercial development, roadways and offstreet parking.
9. To utilize landscaping and/or screening between all single-family residential and
commercial/office uses. Landscaping and/or screening should also be provided
along major thoroughfares which border residential areas.
10. To eliminate unsightly and blighting elements such as exposed trash storage
areas, overhead utility lines, poorly maintained and excessively large billboards
or signs, and deteriorated structures.
11. To provide for the elimination of blight which is evidenced by irregular sized
lots, inadequate streets, incompatible land uses, physical and functional
obsolescence, and inadequate parking.
12. To encourage the sharing of parking facilities and to generally improve the
parking and circulation.in the area.
13. To provide public utilities and other public facilities of sufficient quality and size
to support the future development in the area.
• 14. To provide for an expanded range of housing opportunities in the community,
as appropriate.
15. To encourage open lines of communication between all the residents,
businesses and city staff.
16. To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the city for
development by private enterprise.
17. To coordinate elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan with these project
objectives.
18. Provide jobs within close proximity of the residential population and
concurrently saving energy by reducing trip time to jobs.
19. Provide a retail service level required by the residents of the community.
20. Secure the increase of housing, commercial, and industrial property subject to
taxation by the City, Independent School District No. 280, Intermediate School
District No. 287, Hennepin County, City, and other taxing jurisdictions in order
to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs
required to be provided by them.
0
21. Encourage local business expansion, improvements, rehabilitation, and
• development, whenever possible and provide financial incentives for same.
.22. Combine the elements of other City Plans with these project objectives.
E. Estimated Public Costs.
The anticipated public development activities in the Richfield Project Area to be undertaken
by the HRA and City in order to support the private development activities include:
1. Property acquisition;
2. Site clearance;
3. Site improvements;
4. Activities in support of streetscape improvements;
5. Rehabilitation and renovation;
6. Public infrastructure improvements;
7. Parking facilities;
B. Right-of-way improvements;
9. Vacation of right-of-ways; and
10. Dedication of new right-of ways.
The establishment of Richfield Project Area does not concurrently include the establishment
of a new tax increment financing district. Budgets for tax increments contained within the
Tax Increment Financing Plans will be utilized for any current expenditures. The establishment
of Richfield Project Area is intended to authorize the HRA to expend tax increments derived
from the Tax Increment Financing Districts on any property within the Richfield Project Area.
Revenue other than tax increments to be expended in the Richfield Project Area will be
designated in the annual HRA appropriation and budget process.
Because the establishment of the Richfield Project Area is not expected to increase the
captured tax capacity of the Tax Increment Financing Districts beyond the scope of the Tax
Increment Financing Districts, as modified, the impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0 at
this time.
The HRA is not requesting new authority to issue bonds at this time. If bonds are issued
according to the Tax Increment Financing Plans, tax increments from each of the Tax
Increment Financing Districts may be used for credit enhancement or for payment of debt
service on the bonds. Administrative costs will be funded as revenue sources become
available and out of existing balances.
6
S-aD
F. Boundary of the Richfield Proiect Area.
The map and description for the boundary for the Richfield Project Area is found in Appendix
A. A map outlining the boundary of the Project Area, the Redevelopment Project Areas, and
the Tax Increment Financing Districts is found in Appendix B. The HRA is intending to expend
tax increment in any parcel or right-of-way located within or is a portion of the Richfield
Project Area boundary.
G. Parcels in Acouisition and Relocation.
The HRA may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in Redevelopment Plans and Tax
Increment Financing Plans. The HRA may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation
or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives. No additional parcels
have been added to the list of properties to be acquired.
The HRA accepts as binding its obligations under federal and state law for relocation and will
administer relocation services for families, individuals and businesses to be displaced by public
action if such services are requested or necessary. Prior to approval by the HRA of any
development or development plan, it shall be satisfied that there is a feasible method for the
temporary relocation of families and businesses to be displaced and that there are available
or will be provided, in the project area or in other areas not less desirable in regard to public
utilities and public commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the
families and businesses displaced from the project area, decent, safe and sanitary residences
and buildings equal in number of such displaced families and businesses.
H. Environmental Considerations.
Prior to development and substantial financing of the public costs associated with the project,
the HRA will have secured the necessary review of the Project by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, the Minnesota Environmental Quality Council, the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources and any other state, federal or local agencies and received the necessary
permits or approvals from the affected agencies at the federal, state, and local levels of
government, if such review and approval are identified as necessary by the HRA.
Proaosed Land Use.
Property reused in the Richfield Project Area that is in a Tax Increment Financing District will
continue to be governed by the Tax Increment Financing Plan as well as by the
Comprehensive Plan. Land reuse outside a Tax Increment Financing District but within
Richfield Project Area will be governed by the Comprehensive Plan, including any changes that
are made thereto.
The public improvements needed to bring about the new development or redevelopment any
activities listed in Section E, "Estimated Public Costs", of this document.'
J. Development Activity in Richfield Project Area.
Any and all proposals by developers will be reviewed by the HRA and City, when appropriate,
to determine conformance with the redevelopment plan and applicable municipal ordinances
and codes. Property acquired by the HRA will be subject to a contract for sale upon
disposition to the developer. The general requirements to be imposed upon the developer by
the contract for sale are:
1. To redevelop the property purchased in accordance with this redevelopment
plan;
2. To commence and complete the construction of improvements on the property
within specified periods of time;
3. Not to resell the property before improvements are made without the prior
consent of the HRA; and
4. Not to discriminate on the basis.of age, race, color, sex, sexual preference,
creed, or national origin on the sale, lease, transfer, or occupancy of the
property purchased from the HRA.
Description of Private Development Activities
The private development activities within the Richfield Project Area which are anticipated to
occur include:.
• 1. Property acquisition;
2. Site clearance;
3. Site improvements;
4. Activities in support of streetscape improvements;
5. Rehabilitation and renovation;
6. New construction;
7. Public infrastructure improvements;
8. Parking facilities;
9. Right-of-way improvements;
10. Vacation of right-of-ways; and
11. Dedication of new right-of-ways.
• 8
3-C)a
K. -Administration and Maintenance of Richfield Project Area.
Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the
Executive Director of the HRA. Each year the Administrator will submit to the HRA the
maintenance and operation budget for the following year and will submit the necessary
documents to the appropriate state agencies. No action taken by the Administrator pursuant
to the above mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the HRA.
L. Modification to the Richfield Project Area.
All redevelopment plan modifications will be processed in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.029, Subdivision 6.
0
g-a3
Modification #7 to LHN Commercial Improvement Program
for the LHN Redevelopment Project Area
June 14, 1993
Introduction
The following text represents a modification to the LHN Commercial Improvement Program
for the LHN Redevelopment Project Area to include references to the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. The modified Commercial Improvement Program
represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the original Program.
Generally, the substantive changes include the authority to spend tax increments generated
from any of the HRA's eight tax increment financing districts in the Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area dated June 14, 1993 and the Commercial Improvement Program
for the LHN Redevelopment Project Area originally dated October 15, 1975 and last modified
on December 17, 1990 is recommended.
Statutory Authority Statement
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Map of Protect Area. List of Parcels, and Legal Description
4 The boundary for LHN Redevelopment Project Area is not being modified. References to the
area in which tax increments may be expended can be found Appendix A and Appendix B of
the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Public Purpose Statement
See also the Statement of Public Purpose found in Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Statement of Goals and Obiectives
Additional goals and objectives can be found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Public Costs and Financing
This modification authorizes the HRA.to expend tax increment from the LHN Redevelopment
Project Area for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax Increment
Financing Districts.
0 10
g'?-CD Y
Modification #3 to Redevelopment Plan for ILN Redevelopment Project Area
and
Modification #3 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for ILN Tax Increment Financing District
June 14, 1993
Introduction
The following text represents a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the ILN
Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment
Financing District to include references to the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area. The modifications to the ILN Redevelopment Plan and ILN Tax
Increment Financing Plan represent a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the
original Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan. Generally, the substantive
changes include the authority to spend tax increments generated from any of the HRA's eight
tax increment financing districts in the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area.. In addition, a
reduction in the original net tax capacity of ILN Tax Increment Financing District is
contemplated in this modification through the reduction in the size of the tax increment
financing district. Because the original net tax capacity of the parcel is higher than the current
tax capacity, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment is being formally
modified.
For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area dated June 14, 1993 and the Redevelopment Plan for the ILN Redevelopment
Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Plan for the ILN Tax Increment Financing District
dated October 21, 1985 and September 18, 1989 is recommended.
Modification No. 3
Redevelopment Plan for ILN Redevelopment Project Area
Statutory Authority Statement
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Map of Project Area. List of Parcels. and Legal Description
The boundary for ILN Redevelopment Project Area is not being modified. References to the
area in which tax increments may be expended can be found Appendix A and Appendix B of
the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Public Purpose Statement
See also the Statement of Public Purpose found, in Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
11
g
Statement of Goals and Objectives
Additional goals and objectives can be found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Modification No. 3
Tax Increment Financing Plan for ILN Tax Increment Financing District
Statement of Goals and Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
Estimated Project Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from the ILN Tax Increment
Financing District for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax Increment
Financing Districts.
Properties to be Included in the Tax Increment Financing District
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, the Tax Increment Financing
Plan is being modified to reduce the geographic area of the tax increment financing district.
The parcel to be eliminated has a current net tax capacity of $82,900 and an original net tax
capacity of $179,850 for taxes payable in 1993. Because the original net tax capacity
exceeds the current net tax capacity, the tax increment financing plan is being modified to
reflect a reduction in the original net tax capacity of the ILN Tax Increment Financing District.
The amount of annual tax increment contemplated in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the
ILN Tax Increment Financing District was approximately $2,211,000. Because the tax
increment generated from the ILN Tax Increment District in 1993 is expected to be
substantially less than originally disclosed in the tax increment financing plan (approximately
$200;000 in tax increment prior to the removal of the parcel and approximately $325,000 in
tax increment after the reduction in the original net tax capacity), no additional impacts upon
other taxing jurisdictions is contemplated in this modification. The parcel to be eliminated
from the ILN Tax Increment Financing District is listed below:
• Parcel ID #
33-028-24-43-0019
The Executive Director of the HRA is authorized to notify the county auditor of the
modification to the original. net tax capacity of the ILN Tax Increment Financing District.
12
• Modification #2 to Redevelopment Plan for CABA Redevelopment Project Area
and
Modification #2 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for. CABA Tax Increment Financing
District
June 14, 1993
Introduction
The following text represents a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the CABA
Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the CABA Tax
Increment Financing District to include references to the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area. The modified Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing
Plan represent a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the original
Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan. Generally, the substantive changes
include the authority to spend tax increments generated from any of the HRA's eight tax
increment financing districts in the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. For further
information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area
dated June 14, 1993 and the Redevelopment Plan for the CABA Redevelopment Project Area
and Tax Increment Financing Plan for the CABA Tax Increment Financing District dated
January 19, 1988 is recommended.
Modification No. 2
• Redevelopment Plan for CABA Redevelopment Project Area
A. Statement of Public Purpose
See also the Statement of Public Purpose found in Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
C. Description of the Redevelopment Project Area
The boundary for CABA Redevelopment Project Area is not being modified. References to the
area in which tax increments may be expended can be found Appendix A and Appendix B of
the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
D. Statement of Goals and Objectives
Additional goals and objectives can be found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
0 13
g-a1
Modification No. 2
• Tax Increment Financing Plan for CABA Tax Increment Financing District
A. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statement of Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
G. Estimate of Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from the CABA Tax Increment
Financing District for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax Increment
Financing Districts.
0 -14
9 -ax
Modification #1 to Redevelopment Plan for PASSS Redevelopment Project Area
• and
Modification #1 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for PASSS Tax Increment Financing
District
June 14, 1993
Introduction
The following text represents a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the PASSS
Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the PASSS Tax
Increment Financing District to include references to the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area. The modified Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing
Plan represent a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the original
Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan. Generally, the substantive changes
include the authority to spend tax increments generated from any of the HRA's eight tax
increment financing districts in the Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. For further
information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area
dated June 14,1993 and the Redevelopment Plan for the PASSS Redevelopment Project Area
and Tax Increment Financing Plan for the PASSS Tax Increment Financing District dated
December 19, 1989 is recommended.
• Modification No. 1
Redevelopment Plan for PASSS Redevelopment Proiect Area
A. Statement of Public Purpose
See also the Statement of Public Purpose found in Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
C. Description of the Redevelopment Project Area
The boundary for PASSS Redevelopment Project Area is not being modified. References to
the area in which tax increments may be expended. can be found Appendix A and Appendix
B of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
D. Statement of Goals and Objectives
Additional goals and objectives can be found in Section.D of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
0 1.5
g-a f
Modification No. 1
Tax Increment Financing Plan for PASSS Tax Increment Financing District
A. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statement of Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
G. Estimate of Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from the PASSS Tax Increment
Financing District for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax Increment
Financing Districts.
CJ
0 - 16
g-3D
Modification #2 to Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area A
. and
Modification #2 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-1
and
Modification #1 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-2
June 14, 1993
Introduction
The following text represents a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment
Project Area A and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-1
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-2 to include
references to the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area. The modified
Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plans represent a continuation of the goals
and objectives set forth in the original Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plans.
Generally, the substantive changes include the authority to spend tax increments generated
from any of the HRA's eight tax increment financing districts in the Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area dated June 14, 1993 and the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project Area A and Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing
District A-1 and Tax Increment Financing District A-2 dated July 16, 1990 and July 20, 1992
is recommended.
• Modification No. 2
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area A
A. Statement of Public Purpose
See also the Statement of Public Purpose found in Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
C. Description of the Redevelopment Project Area
The boundary for Redevelopment Project Area A is not being modified. References to the area
in which tax increments may be expended can be found Appendix A and Appendix B of the
Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
D. Statement of Goals and Objectives
Additional goals and objectives can be found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
0 17
Modification No. 2
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-1
A. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statement of Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
G. Estimate of Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from the Tax Increment
Financing District A-1 for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax
Increment Financing Districts.
W. Restrictions of Pooling
Tax increments generated from Tax Increment Financing District A-1 may be expended
outside the boundary of Tax Increment Financing District A-1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
. Sections 469.1763 and 469.175, Subdivision 8.
18
E'3a.
Modification No. 1
. Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District A-2
A. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statement of Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
G. Estimate of Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from Tax Increment Financing
District A-2 for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax Increment
Financing Districts.
W. Restrictions of Pooling
Tax increments generated from Tax Increment Financing District A-2 may be expended
outside the boundary of Tax Increment Financing District A-2 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.1763 and 469.175, Subdivision 8.
0 19
?,, 3'--??
Modification #2 to Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area B
and
Modification #2 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District B-1
and
Modification #1 to Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District B-2
June 14, 1993
Introduction
The following text represents a modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment
Project Area B and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District B-1
and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District B-2 to include
references to the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area.. The modified
Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plans represent a .continuation of the goals
and objectives set forth in the original Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plans.
Generally, the substantive changes include the authority to spend tax increments generated
from any of the HRA's eight tax increment financing districts in the Richfield Redevelopment
Project Area. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment. Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area dated June 14, 1993 and the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project Area B and Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing
District B-1 and Tax Increment Financing District B-2 dated July 16, 1990 and July 20, 1992
is recommended.
• Modification No. 2
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area B
A. Statement of Public Purpose
See also the Statement of Public Purpose found in Section B of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
C. Description of the Redevelopment Project Area
The boundary for Redevelopment Project Area B is not being modified. References to the area
in which tax increments may be expended can be found Appendix A and Appendix B of the
Redevelopment Plan for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
D. Statement of Goals and Objectives
Additional goals and objectives can be found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan for
Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
0 -20
9-3?
Modification No. 2
Tax Increment Financing Pion for Tax Increment Financina District B-1
A. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statement of Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
G. Estimate of Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from Tax Increment Financing
District B-1 for qualified activities identified. in the budget of any of the Tax Increment
Financing Districts.
W. Restrictions of Pooling
Tax increments generated from Tax Increment Financing District B-1 may be expended outside
the boundary of Tax Increment Financing District B-1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.1763 and 469.175, Subdivision 8.
0 21
Modification No. 1
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District B-2
A. Statutory Authority
See also the Statutory Authority found in Section C of the Redevelopment Plan for Richfield
Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
B. Statement of Objectives
See also the Statement of Goals and Objectives found in Section D of the Redevelopment Plan
for Richfield Redevelopment Project Area, dated June 14, 1993.
G. Estimate of Costs
This modification authorizes the HRA to expend tax increment from the CABA Tax Increment
Financing District B-2 for qualified activities identified in the budget of any of the Tax
Increment Financing Districts.
W. Restrictions of Pooling
Tax increments generated from Tax Increment Financing District B-2 may be expended outside
the boundary of Tax Increment Financing District B-2 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.1763 and 469.175, Subdivision 8.
0 - 22
g-3io
APPENDIX A
• MAP AND DESCRIPTION OF RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
•
0 A
•
Q
Z
D
O
co
Q
LLJ
X
a
III-
¦¦ V
Q
? O
z a
o- w
Q
a`
OJ
Q
W
T.
..YIII
V
P-A
i t = •gppl t l of t G
r Y 1?0 M q Y •-M•? ? F
U. w z
NfiONrli ?
Ud
i I W
18 It L • Jl __JtJJ
4102 ?._
Yl it IL ?L. JJ - w ~ `w ?. w X w ?' S
MO,131lDN01 __ --_______ - , MOll3laNOl
IN VV033 7Ar Yr030
41st' 0?0000??0?_• QO rlff
N010N IN001B r-? NOlON1110Q1S
Yl it O?OOF i? ODO it 91
YI?I O?OO? 00 ?? rl?1
OOOO0OOO0C?? QOO
rl zl 0000C]OOO000000 YI zl
OOO?OOOOOO
?, - OOO 000000 4101
41t ol 10173 000 000000
II V 0000000000 1113
09VOIND ,
Cf1YNtlloo ,? J 0000000000 snawfnoo
0000000000
owrlNVOl I .jn r 000000000 ONrINV°
OODOOOOOOO
7Ar ONr11YW ?? 7Ar OM?,1YW
r{f O? ?II i????O Yff
rlfr I ? -. OOeU"t'i_J800 • ? rlf.
"OINm ?OOO???OO I NolN1,0
„f Oo 000000800 - „f
O O 0880000
MAUS ? ?0 ??0880000 f 3AUS
`" O?C?BBBOODO "'
7Ar 1311001M '3Ar 131103fN
1,30flrli II 1130S1V14
III ?? OO 00000
N1rOM1 .11011140131A
nid , II a? (OHO /'1 ??n ??^?OQ
AYf1YS„Id III - ? .-.V...? ??+•i- ?®5-?4?.?.1.?.?J _L._.l.- AtltlYSllld
1Nrf131d ra - '-'-'-' iNrfr3ld
ONrYa I I ?- J ?--- _._• ? ON.tla
BC7 Mr?Q L._.
131YYtN I ? 131tlYrN
0,31/rra ICI P E 0 G1 31
7Ar 31rONA1 '3AV 31rONAl
NOIIIOIr I' ®?Q0088®
r
INVANY
I
a0000a
MOO Ili a0000 1NrAr
xril? .I = • I? xvjlw
1NOd110 C Y OOOOII II 1NOdf10
NOStl3w3 \\` ; QOt? N091131131
INOV1311d
OVVVM i_J?OOO i OY"Yla
lO10Y11(IN -------_-_ '?? 10109NflN
ONIAYI ???0 OO ®® ¦• I ?\?\ aN1AY1
f3Nrr O?OO - J 000 \. i3wrr
XONX _ OOO - t OOOO I __ X°NN
- 000010000 l n
"r'°' - 0000 ?oooo 00 "r'°'
wvayoN p Nvarolr
N0143N ?OO? 0000 r-+I OO
DOIOO? POOOO I- ?? N°1M3N
Y3All0 I ? Y3Ail0
D?'?T OCi C?OC?O
7Ar NN3d '3Ar NN3d
N73n0 N33f10
snu
llassnu
Mr01Y3NS f5n;? I, ' Nr01tl3Nf
frNONI ?LuJ'Ol 8B??`- 9Pz:;r? I, ' Nvafv l
NOldn CJO??UU l ??0
n I NO1d0
1N30NIA i
IItlMfrM I [:_77777 QI I L ?'
NY LN32NIA
•3Ar s3xv3x dJ I-
=s '3AV S3Xtl3X
~ M N N N N N N N N IA N t9 N Np
p? N IO N $ s w R r w w w w w
g A-2
g-38
Legal Description of Richfield Redevelopment Project Area Boundary
Starting at the intersection of the Richfield west city line and 66th Street, following east
on 66th Street to Queen Avenue, thence north to 65th Street, thence west to the rear lot
lines of the properties on the east side of Russell Avenue, thence north on said rear
property lines to the north city line, thence east to Lyndale Avenue, thence south to
63rd Street, thence east to Harriet Avenue, thence south to 64 1/2 Street, thence
continuing south on the property line between Lots 4 and 5, Block 6, Lyndale Oaks
Subdivision to the south line of said subdivision, which is also the north line of
Hauser's Second Addition. Thence continuing east on said line and as extended to
Pillsbury Avenue, thence north on Pillsbury Avenue to the south line of Block 6,
Rearrangement of Nicollet Homes Second Addition, thence east on said line to the rear
lot line of the lots in Block 8 of said addition, between Blaisdell and Nicollet Avenues,
thence north on said line to 64th Street, thence east on 64th Street to the rear lot line of
the lots in Block 8, Town's Edge Subdivision, thence south to 65th Street, following
the east edge of First Federal Richfield Addition. Thence continuing east on 65th
Street to First Avenue, thence south to 66th Street, thence east to l lth Avenue, thence
north to the north city line, thence east to Bloomington Avenue, thence south to 63rd
Street, thence east to 16th Avenue, thence south to the south border of Taft Park,
thence east to 18th Avenue, thence south to the intersection of the northerly lot line of
Lot 10, Block 1, Wexler's Addition and 18th Avenue South, thence in a line along said
northerly lot line as extended to the west right-of-way line of Cedar Avenue, thence
north to a point 55 feet south of the centerline of 66th Street, thence east to a point 110
feet east of the centerline of Cedar Avenue, thence south to the easterly extension of
the south line of Lot 1, Block 4, Wexler's Addition, thence west along said line to the
west line of said lot, thence north to the south right-of-way line of vacated 67th Street.
Thence west to 18th Avenue, thence south to Diagonal Boulevard, thence east along the
centerline of said boulevard, extended to T.H. 77, thence south to the south city line,
- thence west to Interstate 35W, thence north to 73rd street, thence west to Penn Avenue,
thence south to 74th Street, thence west to Sheridan Avenue, thence south to 76th
Street, thence east to Penn Avenue, thence south to the north Frontage Road of
Interstate I-494, thence west to Thomas Avenue, thence north to 77th Street, thence
east to the west right of way line of Sheridan Avenue, thence north to 76th Street,
thence west to the west city line, thence north to the point of beginning at 66th Street.
•
A-3
g-37
APPENDIX B
MAP OF RICHFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
•
0 $-1
? - t4D -
C' C 1A G ?>? G C z
Mt10M.L ? = U
r.st
Oil 1. J? ._JL1J
[ _ J[ J ? ? to ? '? ,• a ? ? r" rA sA cc
:
.,a
4141 r[DI.-ICaI Q O z Ie K s! ?t
Q MOn714M01 _-.?-rY -- --.• I110117,1.M01
SAW W033
Im V"
.111 ' •_. •.•.,.,. ,...•,• COCOOCO - Al
"Al
1111 ..:. ? -- 4441 tl ' ; 44 fl
/10?.MI COL?,-J000O ; NO.OMlow
.4. 000
W
lano .,t O t V 4191
•, sl •••: ° ??o i .4 it C
11 11 ? ? 41 11
u a i ' - > ` ZV 000 viol
o
aon17 V ~ Q OO0 aonl7 m
Innn
e..711e i Y" .? 000
W Cl) pew II O, 000 tllrwmoa
W ? SOME M4N n :• ? «? ? ': OOO ? 44w
/? Q ON.1..0 I I .? 0 r: , ON.1M.p
f f O \` 71M ON.7.110r ... t ... '7A. 4M.1aw4 M
u1 }, t1 { X 441 V
446,
Mo.M117 Mo.M177
x Q, V o
-- W Z ..t oo O a` CL
M7
Z Z O 4M7A7..' ?? ?•.?., 1u?, , MAW ? C
c
w Q 1
7M a71w01M w amo>tw E c
a 1,7oenn. l l-? mall.,. Q
IL wa4ofaM7? 1 O w.w?aM741 ?- C
Q O ?ano
aM.1.71,1 q - •}t Y:,v'': - -` ...... .M.l.71,1 m
oM.w
W W # oM.4. V c
Z a71YY.w 11? :: ::•. a71w.w
W 0171,14.. I?1j 't :%;;: •:::!> .. ?.. >:::'':• 0171,14.. Q E
W a ',,,. 71.OM., 7A. 7,.4M.,
aM.AY. .M.Aw M.
n,114* ? ?' ' Il.,11o? Z x
.. W O ro:.
9MO,1n0 . lNO1no 04
w
MEMO
W / .YIAYI _ 1 .MIAMI
W
70N. tom
M.Oo, t?--tr M.f01
V M..YOw I lQQ M.9400
f_ 040.47M ... is loan
O
.'•.r •.•.•.•. .. LOCO
7A. 4474 ?- ¦p.If? '7A. "013d
...... :...,: '? ?I M771q
T 1 ' 1117f1no
M.OIY7M1 w`
Imalw3w
t.wowa 1.IIOMa
MOa1n 1
Na.n
a197701A •? r C1 ?•, : I tN70MM
M4MN1.14 I C ___?? V , I?i •: {.. t t' :?'. _ NYn4Mt.A
IM i7.Y7t / ?'•• ?? 7A. 07.Y7t
.F.•. •.....a sA G t" to sA?
i c Is! F F ? w w T. ? ? ?
B-2
7
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 145
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Consideration of approval of five agreements for the 77th Street
Project: l) a cooperative agreement between Minnesota Department
of Transportation (MnDOT) and the City of Richfield, 2) an agency
agreement for construction engineering services between MnDOT and
the City of Richfield, 3) an agreement for utility relocation
between U.S. West and the City of Richfield, 4) an agency
agreement to recover the costs incurred in the utility relocation
between MnDOT and the City of Richfield, and 5) a construction
engineering consultant agreement for the 77th Street Project
between BRW Inc. and the City of Richfield.
Background:
There are several agreements needed to further the construction
of Phase I (I-35W to Portland Avenue) of 77th Street in 1993.
See attached project budget for additional information on costs
and financing.
1. A cooperative agreement is needed between MnDOT and the City
of Richfield that describes the state funding contribution
towards the cost of reconstructing 77th Street-Phase I at an
estimated cost of $7.0 million and the related construction
engineering costs estimated at $899,840. The terms of the
agreement were described in a letter from William Crawford,
MnDOT District Engineer, dated May 20, 1992. Under the
agreement, MnDOT agrees to contribute 75% and the City 25% of
the 20% local share requirement for receipt of 80% federal
funding for the project. The same cost split will be used to
pay for costs that are ineligible for federal funds. This
means that the City of Richfield will be able to claim as its
5% local share the $2.2 million in costs it incurred prior to
receiving federal approval of the 77th Street project. A
draft of the cooperative agreement is attached to this letter
and needs to be revised before the agreement is signed.
2. An agency agreement for engineering services allows the
Commissioner of Transportation to accept federal funds for
engineering costs and reimburse Richfield for construction
engineering expenses associated with the demolition work and
the major reconstruction of Phase I (I-35W to Portland
Avenue) of 77th Street. The consulting work on demolition
amounts to $52,194 and on the street reconstruction totals
$899,840.
3. An agreement is needed between U.S. West and the City of
Richfield so that the City can hire U.S. West to relocate its
telephone utility lines as part of the 77th Street project.
The cost to perform the work is $22,155.
.e
4• An agency agreement for utility force account work allows the /
Commissioner of Transportation to accept federal funds for
utility relocation work and purchase of an easement to be
performed by U.S. West Communications as part of the
reconstruction of Phase I (I-35W.to Portland Avenue) of 77th
Street.
5. An engineering consultant agreement is needed between BRW/OSM
and the City of Richfield to perform the inspection work on the
Phase I reconstruction of 77th Street. The cost to perform this
work is $899,289.80. The services provided include surveying,
construction inspection, progress reports, preparation of pay
requests, materials testing, and coordination of work with
utility companies. Richfield's 5% portion of the project costs
comes from the Municipal State-Aid (MSA) Account.
MnDOT staff is making final revisions to the documents and the
appropriate City officials will sign the agreements in their final
form.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the attached resolutions authorizing appropriate City
officials to sign the agreements.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The agency agreement, engineering consultant agreement and right
of way clearance engineering agreement are needed for the City of
Richfield to hire BRW/OSM to perform engineering inspection
services on the demolition and construction of Phase I of the
77th Street project.
2. The cooperative agreement provides the state share of financing
of the 77th Street project and is necessary before the Phase I
construction project can be awarded.
3. The U.S. West utility agreement has been approved by MnDOT and
work will start immediately after City Council approval.
The agency agreement for.utility force account work will be
issued by MnDOT so the City can be reimbursed for 80% of the
costs associated with.the proposed utility work.
Alternative Recommendation:
Postpone approval of one or more agreements if they are not revised
consistent with the conditions described in William Crawford's letter
of May 20, 1992.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A decision is needed on these agreements in order to maintain the
77th Street project on a 1993 construction schedule.
ly submitted,
r?
James I Prosser
City Ma ager
JDP:ds
Attachments
7-ol
CITY OF RICHFIELD Tue May 4, 1993 2:19 PM
BUDGET FOR PHASES I AND II OF 77TH STREET RECONSTRUCTION
PHASE I COSTS SOURCE OF FUNDS
-
-----------------
RIGHT OF WAY ----------------
$7,082,447 --------------
--
FEDERAL 80% -------------
$20,840,000
CONSTRUCTION $7,351,665 STATE 15o $5,210,000
OTHER EXPENSES $3,812,559 MSAS 5% $2,213,791
----------------- ---------------- CITY $244,679
SUB-TOTAL $18,246,671 ---------------- -------------
TOTAL $28,508,471.
PHASE II
-----------------
RIGHT OF WAY ----------------
$2,535,000
CONSTRUCTION $7,600,000
OTHER EXPENSES $1,600,000
SUB-TOTAL $11,735,000
• TOTAL $29,981,671
NOTE: THE CITY OF RICHFIELD HAS ALREADY SPENT $2,213,791.77 ON THE
PROJECT. FEDERAL/STATE/CITY SHARE TO BE SPLIT 80/15/5% RESPECTIVELY.
SO, STATE WILL PICK UP ENTIRE LOCAL SHARE AT LEAST THROUGH PHASE II.
d
0
7-3
0
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
APPROVING AGREEMENT NO. 70590 WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE 77th STREET PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)
and the City of Richfield (City) negotiated a Cooperative
Agreement on the 77th Street Project (Project) that describes the
payment of the State's share of the construction and construction
engineering costs; and
WHEREAS, the Cooperative Agreement is essential for the City
of Richfield to finance the construction of Phase I of 77th
Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City
Manager are hereby authorized to approve Agreement No. 70590 with
the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation to provide
for payment by the State to the City of Richfield of the State's
share of the construction, construction engineering and
inspection costs incurred by the City for the grading, aggregate
base, concrete pavement, storm sewer, city utilities, noise wall
and signal system construction and other associated construction
to be performed upon, along and adjacent to Municipal State Aid
Street No. 108 (77th Street) from Engineer Station 1+59.46 Trunk
Highway No. 35W) to Engineer Station 82+87.88 (Portland Avenue)
within the City of Richfield under State projects no. 2785-277
(T.H. 494=393) and No. 157-108-10.
Adopted this 10th day of May, 1993.
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
Attest:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
0
?-q
• RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH
THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING COSTS FOR THE 77th STREET PROJECT
IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sec.
161.36, the Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as Agent
of the City of Richfield to accept as its agent, federal aid
funds which may be made available for eligible construction
engineering costs associated with state projects S.P. 157-108-09
(Phase I demolition) and S.P. 157-108-10 (Phase I construction)
of 77th Street.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Engineer
are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City
to execute and enter into an Agency Agreement with the
Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and
conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and
contained in Agreement No. , a draft of which said Agreement
was before the Council and which is made a part hereof by
reference.
Adopted this 10th day of May, 1993.
i
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
Attest:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
0 THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A UTILITY AGREEMENT WITH
U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE 77th STREET PROJECT
IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield proposes to widen 77th Street
across the utility easement of U.S. West Communications,
.hereinafter referred to as the "COMPANY", within the City limits;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed 77th Street widening will require
establishment of a new utility easement for the COMPANY's
telephone interconnect cabinet; and
WHEREAS, the City and the COMPANY have prepared the attached
Utility Agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions for
compliance with an anticipated Order of the Minnesota
Commissioner of Transportation authorizing the proposed widening
of 77th Street and the establishment of said interconnect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Richfield hereby: (a) authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk
and City Attorney to execute the proposed Utility Agreement
. between the City of Richfield and U.S. West Communications and
(b) authorizes the expenditure of funds in accordance with the
provisions of the Utility Agreement, subject to reimbursement by
the State of Minnesota to,the extent expenses qualify for
reimbursement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota,
this 10th day of May, 1993.
Attest:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
'7_6
• RESOLUTION NO.
THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH
THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN UTILITY FORCE ACCOUNT WORK FOR THE
77TH STREET PROJECT
IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sec.
161.36, the Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as Agent
of the City of Richfield to accept as its agent, federal aid
funds which may be made available for eligible highway-utility
relocation work for S.P. 157-108-18.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Engineer
are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City
to execute and enter into an Agency Agreement with the
Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and
conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and
contained in Agreement No. , a draft of which said Agreement
is before the Council and which is made a part hereof by
reference.
Adopted this 10th day of May, 1993.
•
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
Attest:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
0
2-7
• RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH
BRW INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
FOR PHASE I OF THE 77th STREET PROJECT
IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield does not have available
necessary and qualified personnel and facilities to conduct the
services as described in the agreement for construction
engineering for construction of 77th Street (I-35W to Portland);
and
WHEREAS, BRW Inc. represents that it is duly qualified and
agrees to perform the work.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City
Engineer are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of
the City to execute the proposed Construction Engineering
Agreement with BRW Inc. draft of which said Agreement was before
the Council and which is made a part hereof by reference.
Adopted this 10th day of may, 1993.
•
Attest:
Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk
Martin J. Kirsch Mayor
C7
GB
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 143
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Purchase in excess of $5,000 for mower at Rich Acres Golf Course.
,Background:
The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that
when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or
construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase
shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration.
One fully depreciated greensmaster, purchased in 1986 (Unit #36)
by the Golf Course, is scheduled to be replaced in 1993. Staff
solicited quotations in an informal bidding process, including
trade-in prices on a 1986 Toro GM300 Greensmaster. North Star
Turf, Inc. submitted a quotation for a Jacobsen GreensKing IV.
The other two vendors quoted on a Toro Greensmaster 3000. The
quotes are as follows:
MTI Distributing Company
Add for Single Point Adjustment
Less Trade-In of 1986 Toro GM300
Total
• Erv's Lawn Mower Repair
Add for Single Point Adjustment
Less Trade-In of 1986 Toro GM300
Total
North Star Turf, Inc.
Less Rebate if ordered before 5/31/93
Less Trade-In of 1986 Toro GM300
Total
$10,385
500
(1,750)
$ 9,135
$11,631
560
(1,500)
$10,691
$13,550
(800)
(500)
$12,250
The Central Garage approved 1993 motor pool budget contains
adequate funding for this purchase.
Recommended Motion:
Approve a purchase order to MTI Distributing, Inc. for a total of
$9,135 for the Toro Greensmaster 3000, plus sales tax of $593.78
for a total of $9,728.78.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The mowers presently owned by the Golf Course are Toro brand,
and parts would be interchangeable with the new machine.
2. There is adequate funding in the approved 1993 motor pool
budget.
03. MTI Distributing Company has proven to be a very reliable
vendor for the City.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council may choose to reject all quotations and instruct staff to
obtain new quotations.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is on the May 10, 1993 consent calendar. Staff is
requesting approval at this time in order to facilitate timely
delivery of the unit.
Respe tf ly submitted,
rosser
James Tnager
City JDP:ds
•
.7
0
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No.144
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Application for a community celebration event license with a
request for a fee waiver by the Fourth of July Committee for events
scheduled to take place on July 4, 1993.
Background:
Each year the Fourth of July Committee makes application for a
community celebration event license and requests that the fee be
waived for the activities that take place throughout the City on
July 4, 1993.
A detailed activity plan of the day's events is currently on file.
A copy of the committee's bylaws and articles of incorporation are
also on file. The food concessions will be staffed by members of
nonprofit organizations who have been with the committee since the
celebration began. Any proceeds of the concessions are used for
community programs. No other outside vendors will be allowed to
sell at a concession.
The committee has contacted food sanitarians from the City of
Bloomington to ensure that proper food handling practices are
followed. They will work with Bloomington sanitarians and follow
their recommendations for safe and wholesome food handling.
Recommended Motion:
Staff recommends the approval of a community celebration event
license for the Fourth of July Committee for activities held
throughout the day on July 4, 1993.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. The applicant has complied with all of the provisions of the
City application process and meets the requirements for fee
waived.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide not to grant the license. This would
result in the applicant not being able to conduct activities,
especially those concerning food preparation, on the Fourth of
July.
Discussion/Decision Mode :
Consideration of the request for the issuance and fee waiver of a
community celebration event license for July 4, 1993 for the Fourth
of July Committee is presented at this time.
ly submitted,
1]
JDP:ds
Jame. Prosser
City anager
&A
•
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 142
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Purchase in excess of $5,000 for fencing at the new miniature
golf course at Veterans Memorial Park of Richfield (VMPR).
Background:
The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that
when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or
construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase
shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration.
Two quotes were obtained to furnish and install 770 feet of vinyl
covered chain link fence around the new miniature golf course at
VMPR. Quotations include costs for six end posts, eight corner
posts, one toprail and one gate, as well as the fencing itself.
The results are as follows:
Sterling Fence, Inc. $5,351 (.120 Core)
Anchor Fence of MN $7,900 (.104 Core)
Recommended Motion:
Approve a purchase order to Sterling Fence, Inc. in the sum of
$5,351.00 plus sales tax of $347.82 for a total of $5,698.82.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. Sterling Fence, Inc. submitted a lower quote for a heavier
fabric fence.
2. The fencing quote is within budget estimates for this
project.
Alternative Recommendation:
Council could direct staff to obtain additional quotations;
however, staff does not believe a lower quote can be obtained
from a reputable contractor.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item appears on the May 10, 1993 Council agenda. Staff is
asking for approval at this time in order to expedite delivery
and installation of the fencing in time for the opening of the
golf course.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame Prosser
City anager
•
JDP:ds
C?
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 141
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Presentation of•a certificate from the Richfield Department of
Public Safety and a cash award of $300 from the Richfield Crime
Fund to resident Maureen Fischer.
Background:
Maureen Fischer has been instrumental in helping the Richfield
Police Division solve over 17 burglaries which occurred in the
Colony Apartments. In appreciation, the Crime Fund is presenting
her with an award of $300 and a "Good Achievement Award"
certificate signed by the Public Safety Director.
The Richfield Crime Fund has the money available to be used as a
reward/award for services rendered by individuals outside of the
Richfield Police Division.
Ms. Fischer has proven to be a valuable neighbor in the community
of Richfield.
Recommended Motion:
Council approve the presentation
Safety Department and cash award
Maureen Fischer.
Alternative Recommendation:
None.
of a certificate from the Public
from the Richfield Crime Fund to
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for presentation to Maureen Fischer by
Officers Tom Fitzhenry (McGruff) and Doug Forsman and Public
Safety Director Jack Erskine at the City Council meeting on May
10, 1993.
Re ectfully submitted,
J m D. Prosser
C t Manager
JDP:cak
CITY OF RICHFIELD
MONDAY, MAY 10, 1993
LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
5:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW OF MAY 3, 1993
I. RECONVENING OF THE 1993 BOARD OF REVIEW
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 140
• ADJOURNMENT
AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE
UPON REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN
ADVANCE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702.
•
l CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 140
Agenda May 10, 1993
Issue Statement:
Reconvening of the 1993 Board of Review.
Background:
On May 3, 1993 the City of Richfield convened the 1993 Board of
Review. The Board considered nineteen cases, deferring action on
four of the cases to a reconvene date of May 10, 1993 at 5:30
p.m. The continuance was provided to give the appellants and
staff an opportunity to prepare data on these properties so that
the Board could make an informed decision on each of them.
Recommended Motion:
Reconvene the Board of Review at 5:30 p.m. May 10 ,1993 and take
action based on the information presented at the hearing.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Reconvening of the Board has been scheduled publicly at the
May 3 meeting.
2. Information needed for the Board to make a determination on
the remaining appeals will be available at or prior to the
N hearing.
3. The Board of Review must conclude its business within 20 days
of May 3, 1993.
Alternative Recommendation:
None.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
It would be desirable to conclude the proceedings of the Board of
Review on May 10, 1993.
Res ully submitted,
Ja D. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ff
0
AGENDA
Reconvened Local Board of Review
May 10, 1993
1993 EMV
1. John Glennon
2000 West 76th Street $101,000
33-028-24-32-0014
2. Seber Kleven
6930 James Avenue South 129,000
28-028-24-34-0161
3. John Gleason
6900 Blaisdell Avenue South 104,000
27-028-24-34-0033
4. Erwin Stobbe
7600 Cedar Avenue South 425,000
35-028-24-44-0025
Recommendation
$95,000
Owner concurs
No change
No Change
No Change
•
0
SUBJECT PROPERTY(
Address 6930 James Avenue South
PID 28-028-24-34-0161
0 Story Height 1 Story Baths 2
1st Floor Area 1302 Sa. Ft.
Gross Building Area 1302 Sq. Ft.
1
Finished Basement 1000 Sq. Ft.
Year Built 1989
Condition Good
1st Floor Rooms Living room,
dining room, kitchen, 1 bedroom
2nd Floor Rooms 0
I Baths
Walkout No
Fireplace No
Air Conditioning Yes
Garage
Porches/Deck
192 sq. ft. deck
Bedrooms Lot Size 50 x 135
Recommendation: No change
Comments: Two bedrooms in lower lPVPI_
sold 11/88 $143,625
2 car attached
GRID - COMPARABLE DATA
APPLICANT'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
P.I.D. #:
MUNIC:
BUILDING TYPE:
1ST FLOOR AREA:
GROSS BLDG. AREA:
YR. OF CONST.:
CONDITION:
1ST FL. ROOMS:
2ND FL. ROOMS:
BEDROOMS:
BATHS:
HALF BATHS:
FIN. BSMT. SQ.FT.:
WALKOUT:
&IREPLACE:
AIR COND:
GARAGE AREA:
PORCH AREA:
DECK:
LOT SIZE:
COMPS-SALE DATA:
SALE DATE
SALE PRICE
SALE/SQ.FT.
SUBJECT 6808 Morgan 7404 Colfax 6938 James 6926 James
PROPERTY COMP #1 COMP #2 COMP #3 COMP #4
Split Level Split Level Split Level Split Level Split Entry
1302 1206 1336 1131 1111
1302 1206 1336 1131 1111
1989 1991 1991 1987 1989
Good Good Good. Good Good
4 5 5 5 4
0 0 0 0 0
3 2 2 2 2
2 1 3 2 2
1 0 0 0 0
1000 844 800 •1000 900
No No No No No
0 0 1 0 0
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
468 Att. 440 Att. 480 Att. 518 Att. 584 Att.
No No No No No
192 176 234 120 240
50xl35 50x135 50x135 50x.135 50xl35
11/88 7/91 8/91 9/87 7/89
143,625 130,000 144,072 123,600 118,000
110.31 107.79 107.83 109.28 106.21
SUBJECT - ASSESSMENT DATA
1993 ASSESSMENT 129,000
ASSESSMENT/SQ.FT. 99-07
REMARKS: No Change
•
Seber Kleven.
6930. James Avenue South
6930 James Avenue South
28-028-24-34-0161
Richfield
Z
goy
COMPARABLE #1
6808 Morgan Avenue South
COMPARABLE #2
7404 Colfax Avenue South
COMPARABLE #3 COMPARABLE #4
6938 James Avenue South 6926 James Avenue South
3
•
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Address 6900 Blai sdell Avenue Smith
PID 27-028-24 -34-0033
Story Height 1.2 Baths
1st Floor Area 1200 sq. ft. I Baths o
Gross Building Area 1392 sq. ft_. Finished Basement -550 sq_ ft
Year Built 1951 Walkout No
Condition Good Fireplace 1
1st Floor Rooms Living room, family Air Conditioning Yes
room, kitchen, 2 bedroom Garage 578 s q- ft detatrb
2nd Floor Rooms 2 Porches/Deck 299 sq- ft- desk
Bedrooms 1 Lot Size hRx1?S
Comments: Kitchen remodeled in 1978. Family room added in 1987,
plus new windows and new siding, Rasemenr Is 10 ^urses
of concrete block
4/
GRID - COMPARABLE DATA
APPLICANT'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
P.I.D. #:
MUNIC:
BUILDING TYPE:
1ST FLOOR AREA:
GROSS BLDG. AREA:
YR. OF CONST.:
CONDITION:
1ST FL. ROOMS:
2ND FL. ROOMS:
BEDROOMS:
BATHS:
HALF BATHS:
FIN. BSMT. SQ.FT.:
WALKOUT:
FIREPLACE:
AIR COND:
GARAGE AREA:
PORCH AREA:
DECK:
LOT SIZE:
COMPS-SALE DATA:
SALE DATE
SALE PRICE
SALE/SQ.FT.
SUBJECT - ASSESSMENT DATA
1993 ASSESSMENT 104,000
ASSESSMENT/SQ.FT. 74.71
REMARKS:
John Gleason
6900 Blaisdell.Avenue South
6900 Blaisdell Avenue South
27-028-24-34-0033
Richfield
SUBJECT 6832 Garfield 6327 2nd 6821 Clinton 7224 Clin on
PROPERTY COMP #1 COMP #2 COMP #3 COMP #4
1 1/4 story 1 1/4 story 1 1/4 story 1 1/4 story 1 1/4 story
1200 964 1026 924 840
1392 1164 1282 1116 1050
1951 1940 1949 1951 1950
Good Good Average Good Average
5 5 5 5 5
2 2 2 1 1
3 3 4 3 3
1, 3/4 1, 3/4 1, 3/4 1
3/4 1
3/4
, ,
0 0 0 0 1
550 500 400 350 250
No No No No No
1 1 1 1 1
Yes Yes No Yes Yes
528 Det. 44.0 Det. 440 Det. 294 Att. 440 Det.
No. No 154 OP No No
229 155 No 448 350
68x135 77x130 78x176 75x135 80xl34
3/92 3/92 5/92 3/93
10 1,000 108,500 98,750 96,000
86.76 84.63 88.46 91.42
S
a u-?Ti Y
COMPARABLE #1
6832 Garfield Avenue South
COMPARABLE #3
6821 Clinton Avenue South
6
COMPARABLE #2
6327 2nd Avenue South
COMPARABLE #4
7224 Clinton Avenue South
a
•
1993 REVIEW APPRAISAL
RICHFIELD BOARD OF REVIEW
SUBJECT: 7600 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
PID#: 35-028-24-44-0025
PROPERTY OWNER: ERWIN & MARION STOBBE
REPRESENTATIVE/TAXPAYER: ERWIN & MARION STOBBE
1993 ESTIMATED MARKETVALOE: $425,000 $18,478 PER UNIT
REVIEW APPRAISAL: $440,000 $19,130 PER UNIT
::::.....
RECOM`ME'NDATION:::>::< ..... NO CHANGE:,
SALIENT PROPERTY DATA:
PROPERTY TYPE:
UNIT MIX:
23 UNIT APARTMENT
23 - ONE BEDROOMS
0 - TWO BEDROOMS
18 GARAGE STALLS
YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION: 1965
AVERAGE UNIT SIZE: 828 SQ. FT.
•
7
SUBJECT PROPERTY
APARTMENTS
Y f
COMPLEX NAME MUNIC NAME RICHFIELD
ADDRESS 7600 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH PID # 35-028-24-44-0025
•
•
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
NUMBER OF UNITS 23
NUMBER RENT
MIX: EFFICIENCIES ...
1 BR............ 23
2 BR............
3 BR............
OTHER........
GARAGE STALLS 18
NUMBER OF ROOMS .....
NUMBER OF STORIES ....
YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
FIRST FLOOR AREA ......
GROSS BLDG AREA ......
LAND AREA .............
AMENITIES WALL AC
410-440
30
THREE
1965
FRAME
6,348
19,044
39,845
COMMENTS:
MARKET DATA
SALE AMOUNT .......... $
SALE DATE
ACTUAL INCOME & EXPENSES FOR 1992
GROSS INCOME ............ $ 112,493
VACANCIES ................ $ 16,400
EXPENSES ................. $ 33,570 + 595MGMT.
NET OPERATING INCOME.. $ 57,718
INDICATED CAP RATE...... . .
GROSS RENT MULTIPLIER. . . .
SALE PRICE PER UNIT...... S
SALE PRICE PER ROOM .... .$
SALE PRICE PER SQ. FT..... S
THE GARAGES WERE NEW IN 1989. THE UNITS ARE CLEAN AND WELL MAINTAINED.
1992 VACANCY AND CREDIT LOSS WAS NEARLY 1596. THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF1993
HAVE BEEN RUNNING 796. ACTUAL EXPENSES ARE LOWER THANAVERAGE FOR THE AREA.
OVERALL PERFORMANCE FOR 1993 APPEARS TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER THAN 1992.
Q CONFIDENTIAL
1993 REVIEW APPRAISAL
RICHFIELD BOARD OF REVIEW
SUBJECT: 7600 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
35-028-24-44-0025
23 UNIT APARTMENT
GO IdROt??TINL
M/%KILC1- AIVAL7S13
E ADDRESS/ # SALE SALE SALE PRICE AVG UNIT CONSTR. # UNIT MIX
LOCATION UNI DATE RICE (C.E.I PER UNIT SIZE/SQ. FT. YEAR GAR 1BR _2BR_
1 6227-37 Pleasant AveS 36 4/92 $570,000 $15,833 862 1963/70
Richfield
2 7244 Cedar AveS 18 5/90 5428,430 $23,802 936 1965
Richfield
3 6520-28 Cedar Avenue S. 24 5/90 5478,442 $19,935 792 1963
Richfield
4 420 E. 73rd St. 11 7/90 5302,273 $27,479 1016 1961
Richfield
5 10731 France Ave 14 10/91 $320,000 $22,857 909 1962
Bloomington
6 9706-12 Nicollet Ave S 18 11/91 $438,063 $24,337 1018 1963
Bloomington
7 130-134 12th Ave S 16 1/90 $360,000 $22,500 797 1957
Hopkins
8 3711-25 W. Broadway 33 12/90 1768,740 $23,295 866 1959
Robbinsdale
9 2768 Louisiana Crt. 12 10/91 $317,000 $26,417 844 1963
St. Louis Park
'Overall, the market indicates a 5% negative annual adjustm ent. Most of th e sales are over two years old.
8
4
30 6
1 17
2 eff., 22-1br. 0
0 11
5 9
0 16+2 3B
16 0
15 18
2 10
INCOME ANALYSIS
23 Total Units 23 1 Bedroom Units $425
(Monthly Rent) 0 2 Bedroom Units $0
Detached Garages 18 Garage Stalls $30
POTENTIAL GROSS INCOME: Monthly/Annually $10,315 $123,780
LESS: Vacancy and Collection Loss: 7% ($8,665)
EFFECTIVE GROSS INCOME: $115,115
LESS: Operating Expenses : 36% ($41,442)
Reserves: 4% ($4,605)
TOTAL EXPENSE ALLOWANCE:. 40% ($46,046)
LESS: Personal Property. 23 Units X $500/Unit X 15% ($1,725)
NET OPERATING INCOME: $67,344
CAP RATE: 11.0%
EFFECTIVE TAX RATE: 4.3%
OVERALL RATE: 15.3%
..:. ....
Jal.uean.dvcated;.b the::Cncome:A
roach:
.:....... ..
»>:.... ... ..,
`..:
.. ».. .. :.. 440000
RECOMMENDATION: NO CHANGE
,r, n. NTJ 11