Loading...
1-11-93 agendaH 1 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 1993 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF (1) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 1992; AND (2) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 29, 1992; AND (3) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1993 PRESENTATIONS 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR PERSONS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA 2. PRESENTATION OF THE MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE CERTIFICATE • OF ACHIEVEMENT TO THE CITY OF RICHFIELD COUNCIL LETTER NO. 5 AGENDA APPROVAL 3. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE. CONSENT CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. 4A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN RAILROAD FORCE ACCOUNT WORK FOR 77TH STREET PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF STIPULATION AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD FOR 77TH STREET PROJECT C.L. 6 l B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ISSUANCE OF NEW WINE LICENSE FOR SILVER SPOON RESTAURANT, 6700 PENN AVENUE C.L. 7 C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF BID MINUTES/TABULATION AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO PRINT FOUR 1993 SEASONAL RECREATION BROCHURES TO ARTCRAFT PRESS, INC. INCLUDING ALL PRINTING SERVICES IN BASE BID A IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,506.20 C.L. 8 D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 FOR TWO HAND HELD ELECTRONIC METER READERS FROM WATERPRO SUPPLIES CORPORATION IN AMOUNT OF $6,450 C.L. 9 E. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF 1993 LICENSE RENEWALS: AIRPORT BOWL: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, CIGARETTE RETAIL, BOWLING ALLEY, RETAIL ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR, FOOD- VENDING MACHINES BROWNING-FERRIS IND.: GARBAGE HAULER, 11 VEHICLES EDDIE'Z SOUTHDALE CAR WASH: CAR WASH, CIGARETTE RETAIL, SOFT DRINK, FOOD-RETAIL FRENCHMAN'S INC.: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, CIGARETTE RETAIL, ON- SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR, SOFT DRINK GODFATHER'S PIZZA: SOFT DRINK, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, FOOD- VEHICLE, RETAIL ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR KINHDO RESTAURANT: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, SOFT DRINK, ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LARIAT LANES: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, SOFT DRINK, BOWLING ALLEY, ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR PENN AVENUE MOTORS, INC.: MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER • RICHFIELD-BLOOMINGTON HONDA: MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER RICHFIELD MITSUBISHI: MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER S & R DETAILING: AUTO DETAILING SANDY'S TAVERN: ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR, SOFT DRINK, POOL/BILLIARD, CIGARETTE RETAIL, OFF-SALE NON- INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT TIP TOP CAR WASH: CAR WASH TOWN TAXI, INC.: 7 VEHICLES VINA RESTAURANT: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, SOFT DRINK, NON- INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR WALLY MCCARTHY'S OLDS, INC.: MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER WALSER BUICK: MOTOR VEHICLE DEALER WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVICE: GARBAGE HAULER, 8 VEHICLES PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE CODE AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE SECTION 305.01, SUBDIVISIONS 4 AND 5, REGARDING COMPOSITION AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION COUNCIL LETTER NO. 10 6. PUBLIC HEARING AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE FOR SALE OF • PROPERTY AT 6634 FOURTH AVENUE TO HRA AND AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH HRA COUNCIL LETTER NO. 11 u ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS & OTHER BUSINESS 7. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING DATE FOR 1993 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW COUNCIL LETTER NO. 12 8. CONSIDERATION OF MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COMMISSIONER COUNCIL LETTER NO. 13 9. CONSIDERATION OF DESIGNATION OF COUNCIL LIAISON APPOINTMENTS FOR 1993 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 14 AIRPORT BUSINESS 10. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT CORRESPONDENCE • 11. LEGISLATIVE REPORT COUNCIL CHOICE 12. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS 13. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS ADJOURNMENT Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at 861-9702. J • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 14 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Designation of Council liaison appointments for 1993. Background: Members of the City Council serve as the City's representative on various metropolitan agencies and the City's Boards and Commissions. Each year, the Council appointments Council Members to serve on the various agencies. Recommended Motion: Designate representatives for the various boards and agencies. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The City needs representation on these boards and agencies. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Defer the designation until a future Council meeting. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been placed on the January 11, 1993 City Council agenda for Council consideration. Respectfully submitted, Jame Prosser City anager JDP:cak 9l • AGENCY ASSOC. METRO MUNICIPALITIES SOUTHWEST CABLE COMMISSION NOISE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES MASAC RICHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION 0 ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH COMM. SERVICES COMMISSION HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION SISTER CITY COMMISSION RICHFIELD COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL FRIENDS OF WOOD LAKE 1992 LIAISON 1993 LIAISON IVAN LUDEMAN, REP. MARTIN KIRSCH, ALT. JAMES PROSSER, DIR. _ IVAN LUDEMAN, DIR. _ WILLIAM BULLOCK, ALT. STEVE DEVICH, ALT. MICHAEL SANDAHL, REP. IVAN LUDEMAN, REP. JAMES PROSSER, ALT. KRISTAL STOKES, REP. GEORGE KARNAS,.REP. MICHAEL SANDAHL, ALT. JAMES PROSSER, ALT. MICHAEL SANDAHL, REP. KRISTAL STOKES, ALT. JACK ERSKINE, LIA. IVAN LUDEMAN, ALT. MARTIN KIRSCH, LIA. _ KRISTAL STOKES, ALT. WILLIAM BULLOCK, LIA. IVAN LUDEMAN, ALT. WILLIAM BULLOCK, LIA. KRISTAL STOKES, ALT. MARTIN KIRSCH, LIA. _ WILLIAM BULLOCK, ALT. MARTIN KIRSCH, LIA. _ WILLIAM BULLOCK, ALT. MARTIN KIRSCH, LIA. JAMES PROSSER, ALT. IVAN LUDEMAN, REP. NO ALTERNATE WILLIAM BULLOCK, REP. [3 yr. term with 2 yrs. remaining] NO ALTERNATE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.13 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Council confirmation of the Mayor's appointment of a Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commissioner.. Background: Due to the•retirement of Commissioner Ivan Ludeman, a vacancy has been created on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). This is an unexpired five year term which will end in October 1994. Under State law, the Mayor appoints HRA Commissioners subject to confirmation of the City Council. The Mayor has indicated he will make an appointment to the HRA for the remaining two years of this five year term at the January 11, 1993 City Council meeting. Recommended Motion: Confirm the Mayor's appointment of a Commissioner to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to fulfill the unexpired five year term which will end in October 1994. Basis of Recommendation: 1. A vacancy on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority has been created due to the retirement of Commissioner Ivan Ludeman. 2. An appointment needs to be made to fulfill the unexpired five year term which will end in October 1994. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Continue the appointment to a future Council meeting. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item has been scheduled for the January 11, 1993 Council meeting so the appointment can be made to ensure a full complement'of members on the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Respectfu],Iy submitted, Jame D. City Mar, JDP:cak sser r 0 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 12 Agenda January 11, 1992 Issue Statement: Setting a date for the 1993 Local Board of Review. first local Board meeting each year, unless a longer period of time is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. However, the Commissioner will not issue an extension past May 31. Background: Minnesota Statute 274.01 provides that the County Assessor shall establish a date for Local Boards of Review each year, for the purpose of reviewing the assessment of property within each respective city in Hennepin County. The meetings are to be held between March 1 and May 31 and must be preceded by at least 10 days published notice before the date of the first meeting. The Board of Review must complete its work within 20 days of the The County Assessor has recommended Monday, May 3, 1993, as the date of the 1993 Local Board of Review meeting for Richfield. The meeting will be scheduled to begin at 7:00 p.m. The City of Richfield has typically held its Board of Review meeting the last Monday in April. Last year a schedule conflict with a regular City Council meeting resulted in the meeting being set for the last Wednesday in April. There is no such conflict this year. Approximately a month prior to the Local Board of Review meeting, the Administrative Services Director and staff of the Hennepin County Assessor's office assigned to Richfield will brief Council Members on the Board of Review process and of typical cases that may come before the Board. Recommended Motion: It is recommended that the City Assessor's selection of Monday, 1993 Board of Review meeting. Council confirm the County May 3, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. for the Basis for Recommendation: 1. The County Assessor coordinates the scheduling of all Local Boards of Review in Hennepin County. He has recommended Monday, May 3, 1993. 2. This meeting date allows ample time for the City to conclude its Board business. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The City Council could select another date for the Local Board of Review Hearing and submit the date to the County Assessor. Discussion/Decision Mode: • Hennepin County must make a schedule of Local Board of Review hearings to facilitate the County Board hearings and to ensure that needed information has been compiled prior to the Local Board of Review meetings. Notification to Hennepin County should be made as soon as possible, especially if an alternative day is requested. In any event, Hennepin County would like this information returned no later than January 15, 1993. y submitted, RespeInager James osser City JDP:vjb • 0 ?-C?L TO: HENNEPIN FROM: SUBJECT: December 22, 1992 Thomas P. Ferber Donald F. Monk 1993 Local Board of Review Dates Monday , May 3, 1993 Day of the Week Date Minnesota Law requires that I, as County Assessor, set the date for your Local Board of Review meeting. After reviewing previous meeting days and your suggestions of last year, the above date was selected. I sincerely hope that it is agreeable with your council. As there must be a quorum, I would suggest that an informal review of your members with a request that they mark their calendars would be appropriate. Please confirm the date set out or call Tom May at 348-3046 'with your alternative date by January 15, 1993, so that our printing order can be completed on time. We suggest starting times of 6:30, 7:00, or 7:30 p.m., but will discuss it with you if you wish a different time. Your early completion and return of the attached tear off strip will be appreciated and we will send your official notice for posting as required by law. Please return to JoDee Nelson, A-2103 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Confirmation municipality: Date: Time: Place: 0 Confirmed by For selecting meeting dates in future years, information will be helpful the following 6 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.11 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Public hearing and second reading of ordinance for the sale of property at 6634 Fourth Avenue to the HRA, and authorization to enter into a license agreement with the HRA. Background: At the November 23, 1992 meeting, the City Council authorized the acquisition of 6634 Fourth Avenue and held the first reading of an ordinance authorizing sale of the property to the HRA. The City will use federal CDBG funds to acquire the property. Upon sale to the HRA, the property would be developed by the Vo- Tech under the New Home Program. HUD rules require that the City purchase the property and subsequently, transfer it to the HRA to re-sell at the appropriate time. A similar process was followed by the City Council in April 1992. That process resulted in the project now underway at 6501 15th Avenue. It is anticipated that the City will acquire the property in early 1993, contingent on the City and HRA entering into a purchase agreement for $1.00. Sale of the property to the HRA could occur as soon as February 22, 1993 if the second reading of • the transitory ordinance is approved at the January 11, 1993 meeting. The seller is currently on a waiting list for senior housing. Staff wishes to be flexible on the closing date to allow the seller time to arrange for relocation to a new residence. Acquisition should occur no later than April 1, 1993. The HRA would be responsible for any holding or maintenance cost incurred at the property after acquisition by the City. A license agreement between the City and HRA would be entered into to allow the HRA to perform site work, as necessary, prior to the transfer of the property to the HRA. Site preparation work may include property maintenance, demolition of the existing structure, environmental evaluation and survey work. Staff, in cooperation with Vo-Tech architectural drafting faculty, is finalizing house project plans to meet all setback requirements, compliment the design of neighboring homes and incorporate interior features desirable in today's market. The new house will have approximately 1,800 square feet of finished living area. It will feature a split entry design with a living room, dining area, kitchen, three finished bedrooms, two bathrooms, and a deck area. Space in the lower level is provided for a laundry area, future bedroom and a future family room. Recommended Motion: . It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: (04 1. Conduct the public hearing and approve second reading of the • transitory ordinance. 2. Enter into a license agreement with the HRA to allow property maintenance and site preparation work prior to transfer of the property to the HRA. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The HRA has identified this property for a new home project and authorized staff to acquire the property. 2. The City Council has authorized the acquisition of 6634 Fourth Avenue and sale of the property to the HRA with a first reading of the ordinance. 3. The HRA will finalize a development contract with Vo-Tech in February 1993 which coincides with the effective date of the ordinance. 4. A finding has been made by the Planning Commission that acquisition and disposition of the property is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The adoption of a transitory ordinance is necessary to effectuate a sale of City owned property. • Alternative Recommendation: 1. Do not give second reading of transitory ordinance. 2. The City can choose not to enter into a license agreement with the HRA for site work. These actions would negatively impact the proposed development of the site. Discussion/Decision Mode: Timely sale of the property from the City to the HRA requires publication of a transitory ordinance following the January 11, 1993 meeting. ly submitted, Jame City M nProsser ager JDP:ds 0 6- C)- . TRANSITORY ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE SALE, TRANSFER OR OTHER DISPOSITION AND CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN CITY OWNED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA (6634 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH) The City of Richfield Does Ordain: Section 1. The following described real property located in the City of Richfield, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, is hereby authorized to be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of, and conveyed by the City as herein provided: Lot 9, Block 3, McCutchan's Portland Avenue Park Section 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to take all action as is required to sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of and convey the real property described in the foregoing Section 1, including, by way of illustration and not limitation, the execution of all documents, purchase agreements, deeds of • conveyance, and other instruments connected with such sale, transfer or disposition and conveyance. Passed this 11th day of January, 1993 by the Richfield City Council. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk 5 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . Council Letter No.10 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Public hearing and second reading of an ordinance code amendment to City Code Section 305.01, subdivisions 4 and 5, regarding composition and responsibilities of the Human Rights Commission. Background: Recently, members of the Richfield Human Rights Commission reviewed the ordinance code provisions which govern the membership and responsibilities of the Commission. Two issues were identified by the Commission which they believed needed modification. Composition of the Commission Section 305, subdivision 4, now states that the two youth members to the Commission shall not be considered when determining a quorum. The proposed ordinance amendment here would strike that language and state that the youth members be given all rights, privileges and responsibilities granted to other appointed members. In essence, this would ensure that the youth Commissioners are equal and full members of the Commission. Commission Responsibilities The Human Rights Commission has sponsored an Ethnic Day Celebration for Richfield for the past few years. In addition, the Commission annually determines a Citizen of the Year award, and participates in other activities that permit ethnic and cultural diversity. Currently, the ordinance does not specifically provide for the Commission to undertake or sponsor such events. The proposed ordinance amendment would provide that the Commission shall develop and implement programs that enhance the advancement of human rights in the community and promote an awareness of an-appreciation for cultural diversity. It is the Commission's belief that programs such as these are a critical part of the Commission's responsibility. Recommended Motion: Conduct a public hearing and approve second reading of the ordinance code amendment to City Code Section 305.01, subdivisions 4 and 5. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The Human Rights Commission has considered these two issues and unanimously recommends adoption of the proposed amendments. 2. Youth members to the Commission are voting members that should be considered for a quorum and be subject to full • participation. 5-1 3. Events such as the Ethnic Day Celebration have been conducted 10 in the past and have been extremely successful and will be sponsored in the future. The proposed language gives an ordinance basis for the activity. 4. First reading of the proposed amendment was conducted and passed on December 14, 1992. The legal notice was published in the December 30, 1992 issue of the Richfield Sun Current. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Make no amendments to the ordinance and leave the language as it now stands. Discussion/Decision Mode: The public hearing and second reading have been scheduled for January 11, 1993. y submitted, Jame5IVI Prosser City nager JDP:cak • r? 5-J- BILL NO. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 305 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 305 of the City Code of the City of Richfield entitled "Administration; commission; boards" is hereby amended as follows: Section 305.01. Establishment of Human Rights Commission Subd. 4. Composition of the commission. The commission consists of thirteen members appointed by the council. Eleven members shall be appointed for terms of three years, except that (i) a person appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which the predecessor in that term was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of such, and (ii) two persons shall be appointed as "youth" members for one year terms. The two youth members shall be given all rights, privileges and responsibilities granted to the other appointed members. Upon the expiration of the member's term of office, a member shall continue to serve until a successor is appointed and qualifies. Members serve without compensation and may be removed from office at any time by the council, but after a public hearing if a hearing is requested by the member whose removal is being considered. Youth members shat of be considered wh determining a quorum. Subd. 5. Commission's responsibilities. The commission shall: (h) develop and implement programs that enhance the advancement of human rights in the community and that promote an awareness of and appreciation for cultural diversity. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 11th day of January, 1993. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk q b CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.9 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Purchase in excess of $5,000 for two hand held electronic meter readers. Background: The City Council policy resolution on purchasing provides that when the purchase of merchandise, materials, equipment or construction exceeds the amount of $5,000, authority to purchase shall be submitted to the City Council for consideration. The 1993 budget allocates $6,000 for new readers. The readers, Touchread Solid State Interrogators, are used to retrieve water meter readings from outside reader boxes. The meter readings are electronically stored in the readers and then transmitted to the City computer. Richfield currently uses the 2000 series, which is being replaced by the upgraded 3000 series in order to.read the new generation of meters. The quotation includes the communication charging racks, carrying belt system and trade-in of all old equipment. Staff requested quotations from two distributors with the following results: Sensus Technologies, Inc. $6,550 • WaterPro Supplies Corporation 6,450 Recommended Motion: Approve a 1993 purchase order to WaterPro Supplies Corporation in the amount of $6,450. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The current Touchread Solid State Interrogators are being replaced with the upgraded 3000 series for meter reading. 2. WaterPro Supplies Corporation submitted the lowest quotation for two complete Touchread Solid State Interrogator packages. 3. The 1993 Water Maintenance budget will be revised by an additional $450 to reflect the increased cost of equipment. Alternative Recommendation: Council may choose not to accept any of the quotations and instruct staff to obtain new quotes. However, this is highly technical equipment and availability is limited. WaterPro Supplies Corporation is a reputable supplier of this equipment. Discussion/Decision Mode: Staff requests approval at the January 11, 1993 Council meeting. Re c lly submitted, 0 Jam D. Prosser Ci y anager JDP:ds qc- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.g Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Award contract to print four 1993 seasonal recreation brochures. Background: On December 14, 1992, in accordance with legal requirements, bids were opened for printing of the 1993 seasonal recreation brochures. Specifications were distributed to 30 vendors. Four bids were received. Attached is the bid tabulation sheet which lists the bidders. There were four options to bid: Base Bid A: Includes printing services as specified provided by the vendor, the publication printed on bond paper, and the layout and art work are provided by the City. Alternate A: Includes everything in Base Bid A, except the publication is printed on recycled paper. Base Bid B: Includes all printing services. The City does not provide the layout and art work, and the publication is printed on bond paper. 0 Alternate B: Includes everything in Base Bid B, except the publication is printed on recycled paper. Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter recreation brochures are distributd to each resident in the City. The school district participates in the brochures by including classes offered by their Community Education Department and sharing proportional cost of the publications. The specifications were also written to provide for renewal of the contract in 1994 upon mutual agreement of the City and the contractor. There are sufficient funds in the 1993 adopted operating budget for the City's share of the four publications. The City made recycling efforts in several areas including the printing process of previous brochures. The 1991 contract was with Artcraft Press, Inc. in the amount of $28,893 which included use of recycled paper. However, the staff is recommending not to use recycled paper as a part of this contract for two reasons: 1) the additional cost is approximately $2,000 and 2) the "De-inking Process" creates a residue that also presents itself as a waste disposal problem. The Community Education administration has agreed with this recommendation. Recommended Motion: Approve the bid minutes/tabulation and award the contract for the 1993 seasonal recreation brochures to Artcraft Press Inc. in the amount of $28,506.20 which includes all printing services in Base Bid A. 4C-/ Basis of Recommedation: 1. Artcraft Press, Inc. submitted the lowest responsible bid. 2. There are sufficient funds available for this purchase. Alternate Recommendation: 1. To choose one of the other bids from Artcraft Press, Inc.: Alternate Bid A, Base Bid B, or Alternate Bid B. 2. The Council may choose to reject all bids and readvertise. However, this could affect the publishing date for the first brochure in 1993, and staff feels lower bids are unlikely. Discussion/Decision Mode: The bids received December 14, 1992 are to remain in effect for a period of 30 days. January 11, 1993 is the only Council meeting to fall within this time period. Council should take action at this time. Respectfq,1ly submitted, 0 Jam s` D. Prosser Cit Manaaer JDP:ds Attachment 11 c0 to 3: 0 3 4 a (0 A CO P O 0) a) a) > . 4-) Q) .0 (0 .4" U ? N CJ) 44 O 0 0 •r( a) 0 r to -,-I amN ON p ? a?? ° ° o4-) r 14 4-) H 0) 4-) -r j P 0 r. 0 W •E•) 4-) rz N CY) a) 4) U N ON U z (a r. r-I ?? ? O(00 LO r. 0 Na 0 z 01 $4 o(o o $4 aa) ro • w 0 b r•I a) a b4" , 0 to (a z 3o3 O U %44 (D D4 A O a) b rI U ?U ? E A• W w p b w OO p s~ P u r-I .rq w % ( 0 (1) ? ° G m iro G) A P N 0 4-) U 0 a) P •rl a) a) x 0?GN ? a c0 ? - -r .r-l O N N$4 '( O p00 > 5 A b 0 OE •(0 U >4 DU) ri 4-) A •r1 (0 ro ° a) 0 0?N ri S.Ir' 0) ro H (0 U) P-4 0 4-) ON O a) 4-) r• U -r) ? (0 A 4-) 4-) 0) r. a) a) k a aa) r-I a a) k a) a) 0) xA(c) k >4 (0 a) +) E U •0 ? >4 5 •rl UUU N A(o0 r. E aa) r-q k r.?3x 4 >44 EM U 0 a) a) P4 ------- ------- 0 ------- 0 ------- O ------- O ? > c0 ? $ c $ 4 r-I O 10 co :3 0 co r. .N % (0 r-I H w E- 10 Q M M M M V! O O O O a O O O O 4-) Im c0 • O O M O? U') 0 a) n M ON O N !A 10 N N M a) M M M M b .rl O O U ? O O m 0 Q a) r-i 0 0 d1 M H Q M M M M (1) OD +' A Q O O N O fYl .. O O ? ra 0 ON U) :1 a) r- N LO ao a) p A (n 00 C) co 0 (0 N M N M b rc$ to 0 3 N H ? a) w w0 a b b Aa NU U a ) 0 r. H •rl (1) rl a) •r1 (1) •H a) •rq c0 m .0 4 P4 P4 4 A W m 0 pU $4U ((au N 4 N U U U U 4-) 4-) _ ri 4-) t; O ? A . H iQ a) a) o N H U U (1) 0 3 r O U H H U G O b O .C 0) 4 r. ri P4 0 > a) 4-) r? b r-1 a O r-I •r1 w a 0 UU O (a a 0 w E r-i `a a ? ? ) a a 0 $4 (1) p a) ON ?r. w U CYN 44 ro? ? a r-4 `N •rl a) 4-) N •r4 >1 R) E -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - E .-I U •r1 U a) A ?4 a) w a ° c0 E 4 E 11/5 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . Council Letter No. 7 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Setting date of public hearing for consideration of the issuance of a new wine license for the Silver Spoon Restaurant, 6700 Penn Avenue. Background: An application for a new wine license for Silver Spoon Restaurant has been received by the City. City ordinance provides that the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider all wine license applications. Recommended Motion: Schedule January 25, 1993 as the date to hold a public hearing on the new application for wine license for the Silver Spoon Restaurant of Richfield. Basis for Recommendation: 1. Hearings must be scheduled and held before a new license may be considered. 2. The new process has been initiated. • 3. Holding the public hearing on January 25, 1993 will provide ample time to complete the licensing process.. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Schedule the hearing for another date. However, this may delay the licensing process. Discussion/Decision Mode: Action at the January 11 Council meeting to schedule the public hearing on January 25, 1993 will provide sufficient time for legal publication of the hearing. Respectf?'u?ly submitted, Jam Prosser Cit M naaer JDP:ds y/9 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 6 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Two resolutions to approve an agreement with the Soo Line Railroad for permission to have 77th Street cross the railroad tracks and an agency agreement with the Commissioner of Transportation to have the Minnesota Department of Transportation act as the City's agent to receive federal funds to perform the construction needed to create a highway-railroad grade crossing at 77th Street. Background: The City and Soo Line Railroad officials have prepared a stipulation agreement to permit 77th Street to extend across the Soo Line Railroad tracks. The agreement calls for the following construction work: ? the relocation of the existing rail switch to just south of 77th Street so that cars only have to cross one set of tracks instead of the two sets currently in place; ? the removal of a spur track on the Lampert property which the City now owns; and ? the construction of a grade crossing with a railroad flashing signal. Total construction costs may range from $240,000 to $300,000. The lump sum maintenance costs for the crossing are estimated at $50,000. These costs may be reimbursed by federal and state funds as part of the 77th Street project. The railroad company wanted the closure of an existing crossing to permit the new one at 77th Street. City staff opposed this condition; instead, staff agreed to support the closure of the 78th Street railroad crossing upon approval by Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). MnDOT plans to close 78th Street as part of the 1494 reconstruction. If the City Council approves the attached resolutions, the stipulation agreement will be submitted to a State appointed administrative law judge who will issue a crossing permit over the railroad company's track. This is needed to build Phase I the 77th Street project in 1993. The agency agreement will be signed by the City and MnDOT allowing federal funds to be used build the railroad grade crossing. The City also will hire the Soo Line Railroad Company to build the highway-railroad grade crossing. of to • Recommended Motion: Approve the attached resolutions. z4P-I Basis of Recommendation: • 1. The crossing is needed to accomplish the 77th Street plan. 2. The 78th Street frontage road crossing could be closed in conjunction with the 1494 improvements. 3. This rail line is being considered for abandonment. Alternative Recommendation: None.. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is on the consent calendar of the January 11, 1993 City Council agenda. Action is requested at this time to obtain an easement for 77th Street to cross the Soo Line Railroad tracks and not delay the construction of the 77th Street project. Respectf 1 y submitted, James Prosser City a ager JDP:ds Attachments U '1' A p2 • 0 RESOLUTION NO. THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGENCY.AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN RAILROAD FORCE ACCOUNT WORK FOR THE 77th STREET PROJECT IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 161.36, the Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as Agent of the City of Richfield to accept as its agent, federal aid funds which may be made available for eligible highway-railroad grade crossing work for S.P. 157-108-12. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Engineer are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into an Agency Agreement with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and contained.in Agreement No. , a draft of which said Agreement is before the Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Adopted this 11th day of January, 1993. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor Attest: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk 0 i 12/17/92 . AGREEMENT NO OFFICE OF STATE AID MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF.RICHFIELD FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN RAILROAD FORCE ACCOUNT WORK i S.P. 157-108-12, M.P. This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Richfield, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "Commissioner".. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. S 161.36 pertaining to Federal Aid provides that the Commissioner may act as agent for any governmental subdivision of the State in accepting federal aid in its behalf; and WHEREAS, an executed agency agreement between the Commissioner and the City appoints the Commissioner as agent for the City with respect to federally funded projects and sets forth letting, payment and other procedures for all federal aid contracts to be let on behalf of the City, and WHEREAS, the City is proposing to implement the construction of a highway-railroad grade crossing project at the intersection of 77th Street and the Soo Line Railroad's Nicollet Avenue Spur Track; and WHEREAS, said highway-railroad grade separation project will require the performance of certain force account work by Soo Line Railroad Company; and WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain federal aid participation In eligible costs of said railroad force account work, and WHEREAS, the existing agency agreement between the Commissioner and the City does not include provisions for the Commissioner to act as the City's agent in accepting and receiving federal funds for railroad force account work r NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: i. Appointment. That pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 161.36 the city •does hereby appoint the Commissionez its gent to accept and ;receive all federal funds made available for railroad force account i . 1 Z ' d N3At1a? '8 S3W10H E2: T T 26. 82 ?)K qp- q work on S.P. 157-108-12. Said force account work shall be in accordance with the Construction and Maintenance Agreement which is to be executed between the City and the Soo. Line Railroad Company. 2. ELIGIBILITY. The force account work by the Soo Line Railroad Company to be considered for eligibility for federal participation will be as described in the Stipulation Agreement between the City and the Soo Line Railroad Company, including attached "standard Provisions for Highway-Railroad Agreements" (Exhibit A. attached hereto). Any portion of the work which has been performed prior to specific written authorization from the commissioner or his representative will not be eligible for federal aid participation. 3. LIAISON, AUDIT, EVALUATION AND MONITORING. The commissioner shall make the necessary requests to the Federal Highway Administration for authorization of federal participation in railroad force account work and reimbursements therefor under the terms of this agreement. To insure compliance with all applicable feder?l regulations and laws, the Commissioner, or his representative, shall have the right to audit, evaluate and monitor, as deemed necessary, the work to be performed under this agreement. In addition, as to the project, the Commissioner shall be accorded proper facilities for inspection of the work hereunder and shall at all times have access to the premises, to all books, records, correspondence, instructions, receipts, vouchers, and memor nda of every description pertaining to the work hereunder. The Federal Highway Administration shall have the same right of inspection as accorded the Commissioner herein. 4. RECORDS. The City shall maintain accurate records as to all costs incurred in connection with the subject of this agreement and shall produce or cause to be produced for examination bills, invoices, vouchers and other reports and information at such. reasonable time and place as may be designated by the Federal Highway Administra-tion or by the Commissioner or his duly authorized representatives and shall permit extracts and copies to be made thereof. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The City shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws, together with all ordinances and regulations applicable to the work. 6. SINGLE AUDIT REQUIREMENTS. The City shall comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-128 as follows: If the city receives. total direct and indirect federal assistance of: A. $100,000 or more per year, the city agrees to obtain a financial and compliance audit made in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-502) and Office of Management and Budget T(OMB) Circular A-128. The law and circular provide that the audit 2 E'd N3nd65 I S3w10H EZ:ti 26, BE D3Q {A 5 shall cover the entire operations of the City government or, at the • option of the City government, it may cover departments, agencies or establishments that received, expended or otherwise administered federal financial assistance during the year. However, if the City government receives $25,000 or more in General Revenue Sharing Fund, in a fiscal year, it shall have an audit of its entire operations. B. Between $25,000 and $100,000 per year, the City agrees to obtain either: 1. a financial and compliance audit made in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular A-128, or 2. a financial and compliance audit of all federal funds. The audit must determine whether the subrecipient spent federal assistance funds in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the audit must be made in accordance with any federal laws and regulations governing the federal programs the subrecipient participates in. Audits shall be made annually unless the state or local government has, by January 1, 1987, a constitutional or statutory requirement for less frequent audits. For those governments, the cognizant agency shall permit biennial audits, covering both years, if the government so requests. It shall also honor requests for . biennial audits by governments that have an administrative policy calling for audits less frequent than annual, but only for fiscal years beginning before January 1, 1987. The audit shall be made by an independent auditor. An independent auditor is a state or local government auditor or a public accountant who meets the independence standards specified in the General Accounting Office's Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions. The audit report shall state that the audit was performed in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-128 (or A-110 as applicable). The audit report shall include: A. The auditor's report on financial statements and on a schedule of federal assistance, the financial statements, and a schedule of federal assistance, showing the total expenditures for each federal assistance program as identified in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. Federal programs or grants that have not been assigned a catalog number shall be identified under the. caption."other federal assistance."- B. The auditor's report on the study and evaluation of internal control systems must identify the organization's • significant internal controls, and those controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that federal programs are being managed in compliance with laws and regulations. It must also 3 qp-? identify the controls that were evaluated, the controls that were not evaluated, and the material weaknesses identified as a result of the evaluation. C. The auditor's report on compliance-containing: 1. a statement of"positive assurance with respect to those items tested for compliance, including compliance with law and regulations pertaining to financial reports and claims for advances and reimbursements; 2. negative assurance on those items not tested; 34 a summary of all instances of noncompliance; 4. an identification of total amounts questioned, if any, for each federal assistance awarded, as a result of noncompliance; and 5. a statement on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings; 6. refer to the use of the standards required by the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Governments, prepared by the Office of the State Auditor. The purpose of.this guide is to establish compliance guidelines for verification by auditors auditing political subdivisions of the state. In addition to the audit report, the recipient shall provide comments on the findings and recommendations in the report, including a plan for corrective action taken or planned and comments on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings. If corrective action is not necessary, a statement describing the reason it is not should accompany the audit report. The City agrees that the grantor, the Legislative Auditor, and any independent auditor designated by the grantor shall have such access to grantee's records and financial statements as may be necessary for the grantor to comply-with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular A-128. Required audit reports must be filed with the Office of State Auditor, Single Audit Division and state agencies providing federal assistance, within six months of the City's fiscal year end. If a federal cognizant audit agency has been assigned for the City, copies of required audit reports will be filed with that agency also. Recipients of more than $100,000 in federal assistance must also submit one copy of the audit report within 30 days after issuance to the central clearinghouse. Audit reports should be sent to: 4 09-7 Bureau of Csnaus • Data Preparation Division 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132 Attn: Single Audit Clearinghouse 7. NONDISCRIMINATION BEGULATIONS. During the performance of this agreement, the City itself, is assignees and successors in interest, agrees to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. Accordingly, 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 21 through Appendix H and 23 CFR 710.405(b) are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. S. MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE POLICY. It is the policy of the Federal Department of Transportation and the State that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises as defined in 49 CFA, Part 23, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds under this agreement. Consequently, the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 23, apply to this agreement. In this regard, the City shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CPR, Part 23, to insure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform on contracts and subcontracts. The City shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of federally funded contracts under the terms of this agreement. Failure to carry out the above requirements shall constitute a breach of this agreement and may result in termination of the agreement by the State, and possible debarment from performing other contractual services with the Federal Department of Transportation. 9. ANTITRUST CLAUSE. The City hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all claims for overcharges as to goods and/or services provided in connection with this agreement resulting from antitrust violations which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States and the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota. 10. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This agreement shall be effective upon execution by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and shall remain in effect for five (5) years from such effective date or when final audit and payment have occurred, whichever comes first. Such termination shall not remove any unfulfilled financial obligation of the City. The term of this agreement may be extended by a properly executed supplemental agreement. The beginning date of eligibility for federal reimbursement will be determined by the provisions. of-the Federal Highway Administration's authorization land approval. i become binding and 11. APPR Before this agrment shall the City Council ;effective it shall be approved 5 9,d QAI 185 I S3W10H S2 : T T 26. 82 03G and shall also receive the approval of ouch State officers as the law may provide in addition to the Commissioner of Transportation. 12. ACCEPTANCE. The Commissioner accepts said appointment as Agent of the.City and agrees to act in accordance herewith. Dated: January _, 1993 CITY OF RICHFIELD By Its Mayor I i And its city Dated: , 1992 STATE OF MINNESOTA Approved as to form By its commissioner of Transportation City Attorney i i Approved as to form i i Attorney General i I 7tJLOM ?cias-iea L'd 6 W3Atla9 I S3W10H 92: t 126, e2 03G q - 9 • RESOLUTION NO. THE CITY OF RICHFIELD,,MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A STIPULATION AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD FOR THE 77th STREET PROJECT IN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD WHEREAS, the City Council finds that its citizens and property owners desire that the City widen 77th Street between Interstate Highway No. 135W ("135W") and TH 77; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation ("MnDOT") has advised the City of MnDOT's intention to improve Interstate Highway No. 1494 ("1494") by widening 1494; and WHEREAS, MnDOT and the City have agreed that it is necessary and convenient to widen 77th Street to replace the "frontage road function" and for 1494 which is currently being served by 78th Street; and WHEREAS, the widening of is becoming increasingly more substantial amounts of presen • considerably increase at such and (b) provide an additional and 77th Street ("77th Street Project") necessary in order to accommodate t traffic which is: (a) likely to time as 78th Street is eliminated East-West arterial within the City; WHEREAS, the City has obtained commitments of substantial financial assistance from the federal and state governments to undertake the 77th Street Project; and WHEREAS, BRW, Inc. and Orr, Schelen & Mayeron, Inc., the consulting engineers retained by the City to design the proposed improvements for the 77th Street Project, have identified various parcels of real estate which must be acquired by the City in order to construct the 77th Street Project and the City Council has directed the City staff to acquire those parcels for that purpose; and WHEREAS, on August 24, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7908 requesting the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to hold a hearing to determine whether a public grade crossing should be established where 77th Street would intersect the right of way and tracks of the Soo Line Railroad, as provided in Minn. Stat. 219.072; and WHEREAS, the City attorney-and City staff have now reached a tentative agreement with the Soo Line Railroad for issuance of a crossing permit which has been recommended for City Council approval. q.P -/o NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the is City of Richfield hereby: (a) authorizes the Mayor, City Clerk and.City Attorney to execute the proposed Stipulation Agreement between the City of Richfield and the Soo Line Railroad and to otherwise proceed to obtain an Order of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Administrative Law Judge to whom this matter has been referred substantially in accordance with the provisions of the Stipulation Agreement on file with the City Clerk; and (b) authorizes the expenditure of funds in accordance with the provisions of the Stipulation Agreement, subject to reimbursement by the State of Minnesota to the extent expenses qualify for reimbursement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 11th day of January, 1993. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor Attest: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk U r 1 LJ qP-11 STATE OF MINNESOTA is DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In the Matter of the Resolution of City of Richfield Requesting the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to Conduct a Public Hearing to determine whether a public Grade crossing should be established where 77th Street, when constructed, would cross the right of way and tracks of the Soo Line Railroad Company in Richfield, Minnesota. STIPULATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RICHFIELD AND SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the CITY OF RICHFIELD, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "ROAD AUTHORITY" and SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as the "COMPANY." W I T N E S S E T H • THAT, WHEREAS, the ROAD AUTHORITY proposes to extend Seventy Seventh (77th) Street across the right-of-way and track of COMPANY within the City limits; and WHEREAS, the proposed 77th Street extension will require establishment of a new public at-grade crossing ("Crossing") of the COMPANY'S Nicollet Avenue Spurline track; and WHEREAS, the ROAD AUTHORITY proposes to construct 77th Street substantially as shown,on the plan attached hereto and marked Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set forth the terms and conditions for establishment, construction, operation, and maintenance of said Crossing; and WHEREAS, authorization must be received from the State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Transportation, for establishment of the proposed new grade Crossing; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set forth the terms and conditions for compliance with an anticipated Order of the Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation authorizing the proposed extension of 77th Street and establishment of said grade Crossing. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreement as hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. The "Standard Provisions for Highway-Railroad Agreements" attached hereto as Exhibit C are hereby made a part of this Agreement. Section 2. The ROAD AUTHORITY hereby agrees that it will negotiate with the COMPANY for the granting by separate instrument and subject to the COMPANY'S rights therein, of a right-of-way easement required for the construction and maintenance of said 77th Street extension. COMPANY agrees that it will grant such easement upon mutually agreeable terms. Section 3. The ROAD AUTHORITY shall secure, or cause to be secured, all rights- of-way or easements required for its project in addition to that provided for in • Ra44528 RC145-183 1 Section 2 hereof and shall construct and complete its project all without cost or assessment to the COMPANY. Section 4. The parties hereto shall construct, or cause to be constructed, the following items of work.: 1. WORK BY THE COMPANY. The COMPANY shall furnish, or cause. to be furnished, at the expense of the ROAD AUTHORITY, all of the labor, materials and work equipment required to perform and complete: a. The preparation of the track installation of a ballast subdrainage system and installation of a 75 foot concrete or rubber (the final choice of material to be hereafter agreed upon in writing by the COMPANY and ROAD AUTHORITY) crossing surface with 8 foot treated timber extensions on both ends. b. The installation of cantilevered flashing light signals and automatic half roadway gates. C. The relocation of the north run-around track switch to a point south of the proposed grade crossing as shown on attached Exhibit "B". d. The removal of the Industry spur track switch and trackage as shown in Exhibit "B". e. Incidental work necessary to complete the items hereinabove specified. The estimated total cost of the work to be performed hereunder by the COMPANY at the expense of the ROAD AUTHORITY as outlined above is $240,000, as indicated in the detailed estimate of cost attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B". • 2. WORK BY THE ROAD AUTHORITY. The ROAD AUTHORITY shall furnish or cause to be furnished, at its expense, all of the labor, material and work equipment required to perform and complete: a. The construction of proposed 77th Street extended, including utility work, grading, paving, installation of approach signs and pavement markings, drainage facilities including the connection of the terminus of the ballast subdrainage system installed by the COMPANY under 1.a. above into the ROAD AUTHORITY'S storm sewer system. b. The paving of the roadway approaches up to the edge of the concrete or rubber crossing surface and up to and between the treated timber extensions installed by COMPANY under l.a. above. C. Incidental work necessary to complete the items hereinabove specified. SECTION 5. In compliance with the Federal Highway Program Manual, Volume 6, Chapter 6, Section 2, Subsection 1, dated April 25,. 1975, and supplements which determines COMPANY benefit and liability, the proposed grade Crossing improvement meets Classification 1 of Paragraph 6(b), a category not considered as a benefit to the COMPANY, and no contribution by the COMPANY is required. SECTION 6. Upon completion of this project, the ROAD AUTHORITY shall maintain, repair and renew the roadway and Crossing approaches up to the ends of the track ties at its expense. The COMPANY shall, at the expense of the ROAD AUTHORITY, R48 RC1C145-183 Z qA-i3 maintain, repair and renew the Crossing and the Crossing warning devices in accordance with Federal or State law as it shall be amended from time to time in the future while it operates its line of railroad over such trackage and Crossing, but this obligation to maintain, repair and renew said Crossing and warning devices shall cease in the event the COMPANY abandons its railroad operations over said track in the future, in which event the ROAD AUTHORITY may, if.it desires, remove the trackage and restore the resulting pavement void and maintain at its sole cost and expense. Section 7. City agrees to use its best faith efforts to close the existing 78th Street grade crossing over the COMPANY's tracks upon award of a contract by Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDot) for construction of additional lanes on Interstate Highway 494 which require closing of 78th Street between Lyndale Avenue and Nicollet Avenue, or as soon as allowed by MNDot, whichever is sooner. Section 8. The ROAD AUTHORITY may at its option and within ninety (90) days of execution of this agreement elect to pay a lump sum in an amount, to be agreed upon at such time as the final decision is made concerning the material to be used in the construction of the crossing surface, to cover future maintenance, repair and renewal expenses of the Crossing and Crossing warning devices under section 6 of this Agreement. Payment of the lump sum is due within sixty (60) days of the grade Crossing being opened to vehicular traffic. Upon payment thereof the ROAD AUTHORITY shall have no further obligation under this agreement for reimbursement of actual maintenance, repair and renewal costs as incurred by the COMPANY. Section 9. This Agreement shall take effect upon its approval by the City Council of the City of Richfield and the State Aid Office of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Section 10. Either COMPANY or ROAD AUTHORITY may unilaterally submit this Agreement to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the administrative law judge to whom this matter has been referred, for issuance of an order issuing a crossing permit over COMPANY'S track for the benefit of ROAD AUTHORITY. Section 11. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original by their duly authorized officers, and on the dates below indicated. Executed by the ROAD AUTHORITY this day of , 199_. HOLMES & GRAVEN, CHARTERED CITY OF RICHFIELD By By Robert J. Lindall, 63277 Mayor 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 RC145-175 ATTORNEYS FOR CITY OF RICHFIELD Attest: City Clerk Rn44528 RC145-183 3 LIA-/14 CANADIAN PACIFIC LEGAL SERVICES BY: Patrick J. Nugent, 188189 Suite 1000, Soo Line Bldg. P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, MN 55440 SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY By. J.A. Inshaw Chief Engineer Executed by the COMPANY this day of , 199. WITNESS: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) 88. COUNTY OF ) On the day of , 1992, the Mayor of the City of Richfield, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, appeared before me and he did say that he executed the foregoing instrument pursuant to authority granted him by the City Council of said City of Richfield. Notary Public • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) se. COUNTY OF ) On the day of , 1992, the City Clerk of the City of Richfield, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, appeared before me and he did say that he executed the foregoing instrument pursuant to authority granted _ by the City Council of said City of Richfield. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On the day of , 1992, appeared before me and he did say that executed. the foregoing instrument on behalf of Soo Line Railroad COMPANY, a corporation under the laws of , in accordance with authority granted to by the Board of Directors of said corporation. Notary Public R48 RC1C165-183 4 4P-/5 EXHIBIT C . STANDARD PROVISIONS FOR HIGHWAY-RAILROAD AGREEMENTS 1. The COMPANY, for performance of its work, may bill the ROAD AUTHORITY monthly for the ROAD AUTHORITY'S share of the actual costs and expenses incurred. These progressive invoices may be rendered on the basis of the estimated percentage of the work completed. The ROAD AUTHORITY, after verifying that the bill is reasonable and proper, shall promptly reimburse the COMPANY. The COMPANY, upon the completion of its work, shall send the ROAD AUTHORITY a detailed final statement of actual expenses it incurred, including allowable additives. After the ROAD AUTHORITY'S representatives have checked the final statement and have agreed that the costs are reasonable and proper insofar as they are able to ascertain, the ROAD AUTHORITY shall reimburse the COMPANY in an amount, less previous payments, if any, equal to the amount billed. After the ROAD AUTHORITY representatives have audited the expenses incurred by the COMPANY and final inspection of the installation has been made, the COMPANY shall reimburse the ROAD AUTHORITY for any item (or items) of expense found by ROAD AUTHORITY representatives to be ineligible for reimbursement. 2. It is understood that the project herein contemplated shall be subject to all appropriate Federal laws, rules, regulations, orders and approvals pertaining to all agreements in general. The use of said guidelines for reimbursement between the parties hereto shall not be deemed to require reimbursement of the ROAD AUTHORITY by the Federal Highway Administration as a condition precedent to the ROAD AUTHORITY'S obligation. • 3. All work herein provided to be done by the ROAD AUTHORITY or its contractor or contractors on the right-of-way or upon, over, under or across the railroad tracks of the COMPANY shall be done in a manner satisfactory to the COMPANY and shall be performed at such time and in such manner as not to interfere unnecessarily with the movement of trains or traffic upon the tracks of the COMPANY. The ROAD AUTHORITY shall require its contractor or contractors to use all care and precaution necessary to avoid accident, damage or. interference to the COMPANY'S tracks or to the trains or traffic using its tracks, and to notify the COMPANY a sufficient time in advance whenever the contractor is about to perform work adjacent to the tracks to enable the COMPANY to arrange for or furnish flagging and such other protective service as might be necessary to insure safety of railroad operations. The COMPANY shall have the right to furnish all such flagging or protective service as in its judgement is necessary, and the ROAD AUTHORITY or its contractor or contractors shall reimburse the COMPANY for the cost thereof. Wherever safeguarding of trains or traffic of the COMPANY is mentioned in this agreement, it is intended to cover all users of the COMPANY'S track having permission for such use. 4. The ROAD AUTHORITY shall require its contractor or contractors, upon completion of the work, to remove all machinery, equipment, temporary buildings, falsework, debris and rubbish from COMPANY right-of-way, to provide proper drainage away from COMPANY tracks, and to leave the tracks and right-of-way in a neat. condition, satisfactory to.the COMPANY'S Chief Engineer or his representative. 0 RJL44528 RC145-183 C-1 LA- /(o 5. Any contract between the ROAD AUTHORITY and its contractor or sub- contractor to perform the work herein provided to be done by the ROAD AUTHORITY shall require that contractor or subcontractor protect SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, and any other railroad occupying or using COMPANY right-of-way or lines of railroad with the permission of the COMPANY, against all loss and damage arising from the activities of the contractor, its forces, or any of his subcontractors or agents, and shall further provide that the contractor shall furnish the COMPANY a Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy providing for protection of the COMPANY, in accordance with the Federal Highway Administration Federal-Aid Highway Program Manual Volume 6, Chapter 6, Section 2, Subsection 2, dated April 25, 1975. The limits of such policy shall be not less than $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, death, property damage and physical damage to property, with an aggregate limit of not less than $6,000,000 per policy period. The insurance policy shall be delivered to and approved by the COMPANY prior to entry upon or use of its property to commence work upon, over, under, across or adjacent to COMPANY tracks by any contractor. 6. Subsequent to the award of any contract, and before any work is started on this project, a conference shall be held between the representatives of the ROAD AUTHORITY, the COMPANY, and the interested contractor at a time and place designated by the ROAD AUTHORITY for the purpose of coordinating the work to be performed by the several parties and at such time a schedule of operation will be adopted. 7. The COMPANY will credit the ROAD AUTHORITY for the salvage value of all track, communication and signal line materials used on a temporary basis during the construction of the project and accepted by the COMPANY for return to its stock. The ROAD AUTHORITY shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to inspect . materials recovered by the COMPANY prior to disposal by sale as scrap. 8. When the roadway is to be closed to vehicular traffic while the railroad work is being performed, the ROAD AUTHORITY at its expense shall furnish, erect, maintain and remove, the traffic control devices necessary to detour highway traffic after the COMPANY gives two weeks advance notice to the ROAD AUTHORITY'S engineer. When the COMPANY is to perform its work while maintaining highway traffic, the ROAD AUTHORITY shall furnish or cause to be furnished, at its expense, the signs, barricades and traffic control, devices for erection by the COMPANY after two weeks advance notice is given the ROAD AUTHORITY'S engineer. The COMPANY at the expense of the ROAD AUTHORITY shall erect, maintain, relocate and remove the signs, barricades, and other traffic control devices, including the furnishing of flagmen, as required to maintain highway traffic throughout the time the railroad work is being performed. 9. Whenever notice under this agreement is to be given ROAD AUTHORITY it shall be delivered personally or mailed postage prepaid by certified mail, return receipt requested in an envelope addressed to: Michael Eastling., City Engineer City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423-2599 • R44528 RC1C145-183 c-2 ql?-1'7 With copy to: . Robert J. Lindali Holmes & Graven, Chartered 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Whenever notice is to be giden to COMPANY, it shall be delivered personally or mailed postage prepaid by certified mail return receipt requested in an envelope addressed to: J.A. Inshaw Chief Engineer Soo Line Railroad COMPANY Soo Line Building 105 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 With copy to: Wayne Serkland Vice President and General Counsel Soo Line Railroad COMPANY 1000 Soo Line Building 105 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 10. Ownership of Documents. Any reports, studies, photographs, negatives, or other documents prepared by COMPANY in the performance of its obligations under this contract shall be the exclusive property of the COMPANY, but all such materials shall be made available by COMPANY FOR copying by ROAD AUTHORITY upon completion, termination, or cancellation of this contract . (which is agreed to be the time of final reimbursement by ROAD AUTHORITY to COMPANY). COMPANY shall not use such material for any purpose other than performance of COMPANY's obligation under this contract without the prior written consent of the ROAD AUTHORITY. 11. Minority Business Enterprise Policy. It is the policy of the Federal Department of Transportation and the state that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises as defined in 49 CFR, Part 23, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds under this agreement. Consequently, the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 23, apply to this agreement. In this regard, COMPANY shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 23, to insure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform on contracts and subcontracts. The COMPANY shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of federally funded contracts under the terms of this agreement. Failure to carry out the above requirements shall constitute a breach of this agreement by the State, and possible debarment from performing other contractual services with the Federal Department of Transportation. 12. Antitrust Clauses. COMPANY hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all claims for overcharges as to goods and/or services provided in connection with this agreement resulting from antitrust violations which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States and the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota. • R48 RC1C145-183 c-3 q/q-18 13. Subletting.. The services of any consultants to be performed hereunder all not be assigned, sublet or transferred unless written authority to • do so is granted by the ROAD AUTHORITY. This written consent shall in no way relieve the COMPANY from primary responsibility for performance of the work. 14. Worker's Compensation: COMPANY employees are provided worker's compensation coverage pursuant to the Federal Employers' Liability Act, and shall be throughout its work. 15. Right to Audit. To insure compliance with all applicable federal regulations and law, the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "Commissioner", or his representative, shall have the right to audit, evaluate and monitor, as deemed necessary, the work to be performed under this agreement. In addition, as provided under Minn. Stat. S 16B.06, all books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of COMPANY, are subject to examination by the Commissioner or his authorized representative and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor as appropriate. 16. Inspection of Work. The Commissioner shall, at all times during the agreement and for three (3) years from the date of the final payment of federal funds to the State with respect to the project, be accorded proper facilities for inspection of the work hereunder and shall at all times during normal business hours have access to the premises, to all books, records, correspondence, instruction, receipts, vouchers, memoranda of every description pertaining to the work hereunder. The Federal Highway Administration shall have the same right of inspection as accorded the Commissioner herein. 17. Records. COMPANY shall maintain accurate records as to all costs incurred in connection with the subject of this agreement and shall produce or • cause to be. produced for examination bills, invoices, vouchers and other reports and information at such reasonable time and place as may be designated by the Federal Highway Administration or by the Commissioner or his duly authorized representatives and shall permit extracts and copies to be made thereof. 18. Compliance with Laws. COMPANY shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws, together with all ordinances and regulations applicable to the work. 19. Nondiscrimination Regulations. During the performance of this agreement, COMPANY itself, its assignees and successors in interest, agree to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. Accordingly, 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 21 through Appendix H and 23 CFR 710.405 (b) are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein. • WL44528 RC145-18 183 C-4 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 5 Agenda January 11, 1993 Issue Statement: Presentation of the Minnesota Secretary of State Certificate of Achievement to the City of Richfield. Background: During the•state General Election held on November 3, 1992, the citizens of the City of Richfield achieved a voter turnout level of 76.8%. This level of voter participation is above both the state and national average and deserves special recognition. The Minnesota Secretary of State has awarded a Certificate of Achie?vement to the City of Richfield for exceeding the 70$ voter turnout threshold established as qualification for the award. It is suggested that the Mayor, on behalf of the entire City Council, present this award to the residents of Richfield for their excellent achievement in voter participation. Recommended Motion: It is recommended that Mayor Kirsch present the award to the residents of the City and that it be permanently displayed in the Council Chambers. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The City residents have had excellent voter participation and should be recognized for their achievement. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: It is suggested that this certificate be presented at the January 11, 1993 City Council meeting. Resge ,VTuflly submitted, Ci . Prosser JDP:ds S, ,ate of Minnesota a-I SECRETARY OF STATE CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT I, Joan Anderson Growe, Secretary of State of Minnesota, do hereby certify and officially recognize that the CITY OF RICHFIELD had a voter turnout which exceeded 70% at the state general election held on November 3, 1992. Witness my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Minnesota at the Capitol in Saint Paul this first day of December, 1992 Se tary of State .W.