08-01-94 agendaA CITY OF RICHFIELD
MONDAY, AUGUST 1, 1994
SPECIAL HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
HELD CONCURRENTLY WITH
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6:00 P.M.
CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER
ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY HRA:
1. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CONTRACT
FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT WITH CSM CORPORATION
HRA LETTER NO. 56
2. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION OF ISSUANCE OF PHASE I LIMITED
REVENUE NOTE AND PAYMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT PER CONTRACT TO CSM
HRA LETTER NO. 57
3. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
SALE OF RICHFIELD REDISCOVERED PROPERTY AT 7412 AND 7416
FOURTH AVENUE TO MARLIN GRANT HOMES, INC.
HRA LETTER NO. 58
ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY CITY COUNCIL:
1. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR AMENDED
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH RESPECT TO PHASE I OF CSM
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 212
2. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH CSM FOR USE OF
EMERSON AVENUE FOR MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 213
3. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING
SUBDIVISION WAIVER TO ALLOW RELOCATION OF EMERSON AVENUE
CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH TO NORTHERLY PORTION OF CLOVERLEAF SITE
•
COUNCIL LETTER NO. 214
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
1. 7:00-7:45 P.M. REVIEW OF RESULTS OF 76TH STREET WEST OF
I-35W STUDY
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 23
II. 7:45-8:00 P.M. DISCUSSION OF I-35W AND I-494 TRAFFIC
CORRIDOR STUDIES AND RELATED ITEMS
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 24
•
III. 8:00-8:30 P.M. DISCUSSION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
KENNEL LICENSING PROCESS CURRENTLY USED BY
CITY
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 25
IV. 8:30-9:00 P.M. DISCUSSION OF POLICY AND STRATEGY
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AIRPORT RELATED ISSUES
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 26
9:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT
AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE
UPON REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN
ADVANCE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702.
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 214
Agenda August 1, 1994
Issue Statement:
Request for approval of a subdivision waiver to allow
relocation of the Emerson Avenue Congregational Church to the
northerly portion of the Cloverleaf site.
Background:
The Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is
requesting a subdivision waiver to divide this parcel for
siting of the new church building.
The proposed church site will contain approximately 65,000
square feet (or 1.5 acres). The configuration of the site is
the final result of substantial negotiation and cooperation
between the parties to achieve the best location for the church
while saving the maximum number of trees on the northerly
portion of the site.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the attached resolution, approving the subdivision waiver
for the Cloverleaf Site to allow establishment of a lot for the
. Emerson Avenue Congregational Church.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Compliance with the regular platting requirements of
Section 500.05, Subd. 1 of the City Code would result in
unnecessary hardship because of timing requirements. The
entire Cloverleaf site will be replatted, including the
church site, as the necessary steps can be accomplished.
2. This subdivision process does not interfere with the
purposes of platting regulations of Section 500 of the City
Code.
3. Approval of the subdivision waiver would establish a
buildable lot for the construction of a church on this
site.
4. The proposed church use complies with the zoning map and
comprehensive development plan.
5. The proposed church site exceeds minimum lot size
requirement, which is 10,000 square feet.
Alternative Recommendation:
The City Council may deny the subdivision waiver with a finding
of fact that the proposal would have an adverse impact on
adjacent properties or the City as a whole.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A public hearing is scheduled at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, August 1,
1994. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of
Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. Notice of the hearing
was mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject
property.
Respe ully submitted,
James Prosser
City anager
JDP:ds
•
•
JUL 29 '94 11:26 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SUBDIVISION WAITER TO
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND
FOR THE CI'T'Y OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA; AUTHO-
RIZING THE SPLIT OF TAX PARCELS 33-028-24-43-
0017 and 33-028-24-43-0016
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for
the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the "HRA") is the fee owner of
certain real estate located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, having
tax identification numbers 33-028-24-43-0017 and 33-028-24--43-0016,
and legally described on the attached Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the HRA desires to sell a portion of the property
(the "Parcel.") to CSM Corporation, a Minnesota corporation ('ICBM"),,
pursuant to a Contract for Private Redevelopment between the HRA
and CSM (the "Contract"); and
WHEREAS, the Parcel is legally described on the attached
Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Contract and a land exchange
agreement with Emerson Avenue Community Church (Congregational),
CSM proposes to reconvey the Parcel to the church; and
WHEREAS, the proposed conveyances of the Parcel would
constitute a subdivision of land under the City's subdivision
regulations and would also constitute a split of existing tax
parcels; and
WHEREAS, there is inadequate time to subdivide the Property by
plat prior to the conveyance and construction deadlines imposed
under the Contract and land exchange agreement; and
WHEREAS, the HRA is currently undertaking the platting of the
a larger tract of land which includes the Property and Parcel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD:
1. The City Council finds that requiring compliance with the
City's subdivision regulations prior to conveyance of the Parcel
would create an unnecessary hardship, within the meaning of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.358, subdivision 4b.
2. The City Council further finds that, because the HRA
and/or CSM have undertaken to plat the Parcel after the conveyanceir
the HRA' s and cam's Zailur- do Q4mp1y witYt tr?ct au75eA3 iaiaa
requirements prior uo Lne conveye npe or Una 114Arcf+31 4ofta :.o+-
interfere with the purpose of the city's subdivision regulations.
3. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 462.358,
subdivision 4b and Section 272.162, subdivision 21 the City Council
1
JUL_ 29 '94 11:26 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.3
waives compliance with its subdivision regulations for the
conveyance of the Parcel described on the attached Exhibit B. s di 4. The County Ricor?itle torecte
the accept
describedl Can tthe he
deed or deeds convey ng
attached Exhibit B.
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas F. Ferrier,. City Cierk
0
JUL 29 194 11:27 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.4
EXHIBIT A
(Legal Description of Existing Tax Parcels)
P.I.D. 33-028-24-43-0016
The East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of section 33, Township 28,
Range 24 AND the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4
of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33,
Township 28, Range 24, except that portion of the above
description of which lies Northesterly of the following
described Line A:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said West 2/5 of the
East 5/8 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the South-
east 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28, Mange 24, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 13
seconds West, grid bearing, Hennepin County Coordinate System,
along the East line of said West 2/5 of the East 5/8 a
distance of 290.63 feet to the point of beginning of Fine A to
be described; thence North 34 degrees 03 minutes 06 seconds
West 15.50 feet; thence Northwesterly along a tangential
curve, concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 511.33
feet to a point on the Southeasterly line of the right of way
of Interstate Highway 35W, according to Hennepin County
Recorder Document No. 3772729 and said Line A there terminat-
ing.
P.I.D. 33-028-24-43-0017
The West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 28,
Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
3
JUL 29 '94 11:27 HOLMES & GRAVEN
EXHIBIT B
(Legal Description of Parcel)
P.5
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds
East along the north line of said Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter a distance of 347.71 feet; thence South 0 degrees
09 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of259.80 feet; thence North
89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 31.00 feet to
the beginning of the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees
57 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 39.81 feet; thence North
0 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West a distance of 28.23 feet;
thence northeasterly a distance of 114.12 feet along a tangential
curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 114.00 feet and
a central angle of 57 degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds; thence north
89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 41.80 feet:
thence North 8 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of
15.21 feet; thence northerly a distance of 29.35 feet along a
tangential curve concave to the east having a radius of 114.23 feet
and a central angle of 14 degrees 43 minutes 12 seconds; thence
North 6 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 27.54
feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 148.71 feet along a non-
tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 511.33
feet, a central angle of 16 degrees 39 minutes 47 seconds and chord
bearing of South 68 degrees 04 minutes 48 seconds east; thence
south 44 degrees 33 minutes 55 seconds West a distance of 48.69
feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 96.12 feet along a non-
tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 114.00
feet, a central angle of 48 degrees 18 minutes 26 seconds and a
chord bearing of South 18 degrees 47 minutes 01 seconds East;
thence south 72 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds East a distance of
144.10 feet; thence South 17 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds West a
distance of 112.00 feet; thence North 72 degrees 02 minutes 05
seconds West a distance of 263.91 feet; thence South 89 degrees 57
minutes 55 seconds West a distance of 118.93 feet; thence North 0
degrees 09 minutes 58 seconds East a distance of 52.00 feet to the
point of beginning.
4
JUL-12-1994 X11 [15(.J43 FROM /? ( T?USH I E-MO/NTGOMyIERY & ASSOC TO 8619749 P . 02
/V1AJ l1 L AVLs SO// ??/!
1 _
t
-1117
47
I1
II
rI
/I
v
a?
N
a \?
--- tj
a
IV
91
"N
i '
i ? _
\ M
V
w \
a
j
u
N 'D
V: N
N
\ a
N ? \
w
01
•"
?• N $ /
i N ,•,
K
V v
N ?
N
.• 1a W 1
C? X \ l
\ \ N 1
q a \ N \
L.? ..r..r..r.a
!
?v
y?
y?
_ ?6
IL • ? T Z
T
?000?1
•
MASTER PLAN - PHASE ONE
5,,S,9,
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No.213
Agenda August 1, 1994
Issue Statement:
Approval of agreement with CSM for use of Emerson Avenue for
motor vehicle parking.
Background:
With CSM's•initial proposal, all of its parking needs were to be
met on property it was to redevelop. However, when others were
invited to submit concept proposals for the Phase II area, it
became necessary for CSM to meet its parking needs on land not
included in Phase II (CSM's status with regards to Phase II may
not be known until November). The use of Emerson Avenue between
78th and 77th Streets is the only way that Phase I parking needs
may be met.
The attached agreement would permit CSM to utilize Emerson Avenue
between 77th and 78th Streets. It provides the following:
1. CSM may use the street for ingress and egress as well as
parking.
2. The use must be as depicted in Exhibit B to the agreement.
• 3. CSM is responsible for any costs related to construction or
reconstruction. The plans must be reviewed and approved by
the City and the work proceed as a City project.
4. CSM is responsible for maintenance and repair.
5. CSM may not engage in a ctivities which could result in a lien
against the street.
6. CSM is responsible for insuring the City against liability.
7. CSM is to indemnify the City and its representatives against
any claims arising from its use of the street.
8. CSM is responsible for taxes if levied against the street.
9. CSM grants the City the right to maintain utilities beneath
the street.
10. CSM may not assign or transfer its interest in this agreement
without consent of the City.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt a motion approving the agreement and authorizing the Mayor
and City Manager to execute it.
Basis.--of _Recommendation:
1. With the removal of the existing development, Emerson Avenue
will not directly service any users.
2. Phase I development needs more parking area.
3. Emerson Avenue could provide the additional parking area.
4. The proposed agreement adequately protects the City.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Refuse to approve the agreement.
2. Delay action on the agreement.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The redevelopment of Phase I cannot proceed without assurance of
adequate parking.
JDP:ds
Respectfu y submitted,
Prosser
Jame)Mnager
City 9
JUL 29 '94 11:34 HOLMES & GRfivLN
•
AGREE MT
R.2
DRAFT 7/29
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this
day of , 1994 by
and between the CITY OF RICHFIELD, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the
"City") and CSM INVESTORS, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("CSM")..
WITNESSETH:
1. The City maintains and operates Emerson Avenue South ("Emerson") as
part of its public roadway system.
2. A portion of Emerson lying between 77th Street on the north and 78th
Street on the south is within and immediately west of the westerly line
of the Phase I property which is to be developed by CSM. That portion
of Emerson (the "Portion") is described in the attached Exhibit A.
3. In furtherance of the CSM development, it has asked the City for
• permission to utilise the Portion for certain activities and uses which
are fully described in this Agreement, including, without limitation, the
i parking of motor vehicles and for ingress and egress.
4. The City council has reviewed the. request including the proposed
parking layout to be located on the Portion and has received the
recommendations of staff.
THEREFORE, on the basis of the foregoing and upon the mutual undertakings
and promises herein contained, the parties hereto stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Use of Portion. Subject to the limitations hereinafter contained, CSM
shall have the right to occupy and use the Portion for certain activities
and uses which are fully described in this Agreement, including,
without limitation, the parking of motor vehicles and for ingress and
egress.
2. Dessi . The use and occupancy shall be in accordance with the design
layout which is attached h
t
hibit B
E
f
ere
o as
x
. No modi
ication to the
design may occur without the prior wrftten consent of the City.
J30736a5
1RC125-66
JUL 29 '94 11:34 HOLMES & GRAVEN
P.3
3. Construction CSM shall be entirely responsible for the cost of
construction and reconstruction upon the Portion during the term of
this Agreement. CSM may proceed with Installation of the initial
Improvements shown on Exhibit _B together with the removal and/or
installation of utilities within the Portion immediately following approval
of the plans and specifications, for such work by the city engineer. In
the event that CSM shall, following completion of the initial
construction, determine that it is necessary to carry out construction
or reconstruction work within the Portion, it shall proceed as follows :
a. It shall notify the City of such determination and may, with such
notification request that the City undertake the construction or
reconstruction as a city project. The notification shall also
contain proposed plans and specifications for the construction or
reconstruction.
b. The City shall, within 10 days following such notice of
determination, review the proposed plans and specifications,
and, in the event that they are in conformity with the standards
for construction or reconstruction of public streets, shall either
1) let the contract for bid, or, ii) permit CSM to proceed with the
work.
c. If CSM is to be permitted to proceed with the work, the City may
place such procedural or other requirements on CSM as it deems
appropriate for construction work or a public street.
d. No construction or reconstruction of the portion may take place
whether by CSM or the City until CSM has, in the City's
reasonable judgment, paid or secured payment of the entire cost
of such construction or reconstruction.
4. Maintenance and Repair. CSM shall be entirely responsible for the
maintenance and repair of the Portion during the term of this
Agreement. Maintenance and repair shall include without limitation,
patching, filling, sealing, coating, stripping, the removal of rubbish,
debris, snow and ice. CSM shall provide the City with written notice
at least five days in advance of maintenance and repair activities which
are likely to result in a disruption of the use of the Portion for a period
of more than one day; and shall obtain the City's written consent before
undertaking any repair or maintenance activity having a cost of $10, 000
or more.
5. Liens and Encumbrances. CSM agrees that during the term of this
Agreement it shall not permit or suffer any liens or encumbrances to be
placed against the Portion, nor shall it during such term engage in any
activity which would cause or result in the placement of any liens or
circumstances against the Portion.
6. Insurance. In addition to CSM's obligations under paragraph 7 below,
csM agreem to obtain and, lEeep in place one or more poitcles of liability
Insurances, in an amount and form acceptable to the City, which insure
against the rids of property damage, personal injury or death
oooasiomod by or arlsi out of COWn ueaa and occupancy of the Portion.
=D73665
RC125-68 2
JUL 29 '94 '11:35 HOLMES &-'GRAVEN
P.4
Said policy or policies of insurance shall, as they relate to the Portion,
• name the City as till additional insured.
7. Indemnity. CSM shall indemnify, release, defend and save harmless the
City, its officers, agents and employees from all claims, or whatever
nature, and including claims for punitive damages, for contractual
liability, property damage, personal injury or death occasioned by or
arising out of CSM's occupancy and use repair, maintenance,
construction and reconstruction of the Portion. The provisions of this
paragraph shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of the liability
limits contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466; nor shall the
provisions of this paragraph apply to the extent that any claim for
damages is based upon the City's negligence.
8. Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until
terminated by the happening of any of the following:
as CSM is in default of its obligations hereunder or under its
contract for private redevelopment with the Richfield Housing
and Redevelopment Authority date April 29, 1994 (the
"Contract"), and has failed to cure such default under this
Agreement within 30 days of written notice by the City or has
failed to promptly commence and pursue cure activities in
instances in which the cure will take more than 30 days;
or has failed to effect a cure in the time required under the
Contract for any default thereunder.
b. The City makes available for purchase an alternative area which
can be developed to contain at least the same number of parking
spaces; and which is as accessible to the Phase I development as
is the Portion. The purchase price shall be an amount equal to
the cost and expenses which the City incurs in acquiring such
land.
c • The City, whether or not being first asked by CSM to do so,
vacates Emerson lying within the Portion and offers the Portion
for sale to CSM at an amount equal to the City's costs and
expense to acquire.
In the event the City proceeds under either paragraphs b or c of this
Section 8, termination shall be effective 30 days following the date of
the offer to sell an alternative area or the offer of sale of the Portion
following vocation; provided, however, that if within such period CSM
shall accept such offer, then this agreement shall not terminate until
the parties have a reasonable time to complete the transactions; and in
the event of an 8b transaction such additional time as is reasonably
necessary to complete construction on the alternative improvements.
In the event of a termination, the City shall grant CSM an easement to
maintain any utilities owned and used by CSM located within the
Portion I but only if and to the extent that such grant will not
unreasonable interfere with the City's use of the portion following
termination. No=&g in this paragraph 8 shall be deemed as a waiver
by the City of its right to seek, as it sees fit, to terminate the interest
of 08M in the Portion through the cacercisc of eminent dom dn.
JBD73645
RC125-68 3
JUL 25 '94-11::18 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.5
9. Taxes. In the event that the Portion should become taxable as a result
of its use and occupancy as provided herein, CSM agrees that it will,
promptly when due and before penalty attaches, pay all real estate
taxes and installments on special assessments.
10. Utilities. CSM acknowledges that the Indemnity contained in paragraph
7 of this agreement is intended to release the City, its officers, agents
and employees from any damage done to the Portion as the result of the
City's repair, replacement or maintenance of the City utility services
located within the Portion. CSM acknowledges that the reasonable cost
of restoring the surface following any such City activities is CSM's
responsibility. CSM also agrees that the City and its agents have the
right to enter upon the Portion and do all things reasonably necessary
and proper to carry out such activities. The City agrees that it will
exercise reasonable care to limit any disruption caused by such work.
11. Usa. The City specifically retains the right to authorize others to
use the Portion for parking purposes and ingress and egress thereto
but only to the extent that suitable arrangements are made to provide
alternative parking of location and sufficient number of spaces to
compensate for the reasonably anticipated impact of such usage on
CSM's parking requirements. Such arrangement shall also reasonably
address maintenance, repair, cost and liability issues.
12. Assignment. The rights granted to CSM hereunder way be transferred
only in connection with a transfer or the Phase I property in accordance
with the provisions of Articles VIII or IX of the Contract.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands as of the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF RICHFIELD
By
Its
By
Its
CSM CORPORATION
By
zt?
9
JW73645
RC125-58 4
JUL z9"'94 11:36 HOLMES & GPAVEN P.6
I
• STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1994, by and
the Mayor and City Manager, respective, on behalf of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
?,..,,_ , 1993, by and P
respectively, of CSM Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behafir o the
corporation.
Notary Public
M73e45
acizs-?a 5
MM-Pn" NK'P'4B
SIN 3JbNOdd JI8ON131JS
oe=jsj.Qa.'5? 'llOd V10S3NNIIY { i?R ;i ia° a ° J
03Wd36fd '073/jHOIN g° }iii BPD p d °
` 3-1VONA-1 iV SdOHS 3Hi pi ";M;i : a
Y•a
Y
r I I '? . x- F xa y7 ° ?
x
x S^. o
M) - s sQ J I
C)
Yyi I' •.0 .
//?? H ?I
Isv ? b?LF It, I
Flit
gig 9 p 4
°. .., ?,
Lift)
F
I - - - - €aTg l z
I .?°?€ Yy?? Spyfgt I x s
J 'E?P? aa. 3•'?7 I i III e? Y
HiMS'31m XV4700 •- I I I . ':IAV ISM?
I U ass I I
HIM
? I I M1 I I sx I
M mgr • I I? ' II 1
? sb? ?t g ` Zi
a- k _ 'I I I I I r-I j '4
P•
N a I I I° I W
w/nos 3 ro lnodfv A ° I. 3 I F U)
o' s I I. i O
Y" 1 I z
? ?.. ? ;? I Ills- z w
Y ?g ° ? 1ry
E-1 &11111?1 CL
H a- ? I I'ti'I l lI " I f W z
pj?
.!2 II 11IIII III irl
??' -' ??/ .? r?•t` :1 I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I °I ?I I I. i :- 1' W
sl ?
- ?:- f .% Tg111 III I.11111111111•IJill i1111111[III1lllllllll._j
ai n ? y ?Oy
% x
Ia? ?
'M
:a?°
. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Council Letter No. 212
Agenda August 1, 1994
Issue St_ atem_e_nt_ :
Request for an amended planned unit development/final development
plan and conditional use permit with respect to Phase I of the
CSM Redevelopment Project.
Background:
On April 18, 1994, the City Council approved a proposal by CSM to
redevelop the Phase I Project Area of the Interstate/Lyndale/
Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment District. Phase I included a Best
Buy, SportMart and CompUSA totaling 114,484 square feet and 488
parking spaces. CSM is requesting a modification of the parking
ratio, building size, building configuration, and layout. The
modification would increase the building size from 114,489 square
feet to 116,605 square feet and parking from 488 to 515 spaces.
The amendment would also include the following modifications:
? Reconfigure building, placing SportMart on the west side
as Anchor A, CompUSA (or other) in the middle as Anchor
B, and Best Buy on the east side as Anchor C.
? Increase the size of Best Buy from 47,234 square feet to
• 57,076 square feet.
? Increase the size of SportMart from 42,101 square feet to
43,968 square feet.
? Decrease the size of CompUSA (or other) from 25,154
square feet to 15,561 square feet.
? Increase total number of parking spaces from 488 to 515
and increase number of handicapped stalls from 8 to 10.
Also, all spaces would be designed for normal size cars
(previous plan had 133 spaces designed for compact car
parking only).
? Eliminate parking north of the building, and move the
building north approximately 35 feet.
? Intensify landscape plantings on the northwest corner of
the site.
? Move the building to the west approximately 10 feet, and
utilize existing Emerson Avenue for parking along west
side of building.
? Place two overhead garage doors on the northern portion
of the east wall. This door would allow vehicles to
enter the building for stereo installation.
? Modify the docking area to provide one centralized and
recessed unloading area with a right in/right out only
access to 77th Street.
? Move the parking lot entrance on Colfax Avenue to the
southern end of Colfax (temporary access until Phase II
is determined).
Recommended Motion:
Approve the amended planned unit development/final development
plan and conditional use permit for Phase I of the CSM
Redevelopment Project with the following stipulations:
1. That upon completion of Phase II development, the Colfax
Avenue curb cut in the parking lot be relocated northward,
consistent with Phase II development.
2. That the City Planner approve the landscaping and screening
plan.
3. That the City Engineer approve the erosion control plan and
storm water management plan.
4. That the applicant submit a cash escrow agreement for
landscaping before the conditional use permit will become
. effective.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The proposal is consistent with the ILN Redevelopment Plan
and Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposal provides a workable plan for Phase I, regardless
of Phase II development.
Alternative Recommendation:
Deny the amended planned unit development/final development plan
and conditional use permit for Phase I of the CSM Redevelopment
Project with a finding that the amendment would have adverse
impacts on the adjacent properties or the City as a whole.
Discussion Decision Mode:
A public hearing is scheduled at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, August 1,
1994. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of
Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. Notice of hearing was
published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within
350 feet of the subject property.
Resp tfully submitted,
. Jame Prosser
City nager
JDP:ds
Mnilm HM Y•es
6.!i.,.a,.3 yqs?
VlDS3NN1H'Q73idHJra q j p,3 • a
t .1
11
3l`daNAl IV SdOHS 3Hi
i
b ! b ' C h
l is ,1 K ....
da
e d li' V }-- -?: -?
z
I
a-
• I .4l: ? v
f. \ \ W - i U H
h
« I b '
V: !
r
niq
s!! ?.?7
r E H ?
!a ? ? A
..\ K \ A` ? v0 Y a'
r? ??_ a \ C s a
U a
Q 6 _ X F
z- U
+ .•. a. _ it
R o le
u?
I I I I
I I I I I
i I I I I
I I I I I
HUpS'3i?' ,1'diW
I ? I I ?
I I I 1 I
I I I I I
N,/b5 '3A' ,M6f/10
i
I
I
HUgS'3AI NY!!W ( I
I • 3 Y t 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 V 1 1 1 1 1
nA
i ? f?'rH IIVTlIITI?
11 [11 H
••I I I I I F?
f=fi- Elm
?IIIIIIIIII0ii1i lla
F 111???
• LLHtH*"
1 ` ? ; = H FY•
?y k
IIIIIItliiailnliiiliFi
r E H,M$'3N NOSH3K3 ? d E ?
Y:
W • r • '.
..? ?... $3
N
g
W
O)
T
r
J
a
a
Q
J
? a
W
L
r
N
W
O
a
a
Q
J
Q
Z
/
V
m
0
ZED
LU
Z
0
LU
a
i
6
wrtrnx raga 3E)VNOVd NHOM31JS i 41 a X19° s
M r_.L Mg T ?? x ???? xp@ s . ?
uo?g.,oaao0 1QS0 . -4 V10S3NN/W a4 J9r g 5? i:. a a J
03NHd3ad '(T7313N.)lb 1 gFe'?se eta d ;
.Y: y 8? ? P P
31`d( iV SdOHS 3Hl
4 z, g o
k U
? - O
Z
go a 3¦e O
M "4
g . -
F
'o
E a _? ? ?V
gg J
e¢ - Yg o Sd
yyi ° 384 ° P a
~ M E?` o ?? ? ? Y
I I E : Ig 4
h A
J
HLWS'3M NV4700
Y
Yh.?
w
z
z
g
111
I-
Fn
z
a
a
w
H
H
0
E-i
E-1
z
w
Q
z
w
Q
w
O
a
0
a
a
r-v- mg
;'? 1?i1 G J
vepwodaoo NISI V1053NNNY'0731j04018
t• ?a j?" lril ?? g ' ' a
3IWCINAI ld SdOHS 3Hl • ?! a
c?
v - ? r
oiz-,
?5???vK?a v fY tia ??:85t$ YQ ifi? ;`rtt t
I I I I I
I I I I I
Mir= '3ro xvim
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I?
..---...----- .--
M"S7M lxodnv
I I I I
I I I I
1 I I I
I I
I I
I I
u?l
g
U
'3M dV rW SWUS/X3
r
?e.
I n
g" r
y ag! 4
ek?
,?
?
x???
c Y y'
++
tt
y7bgD 4
i0ii
? ??? I l
I I I
9 i
i
i
•
j i f? ?.? lk fk
i
E s• ::e r i
J
i
?
C?I e6? 3?
z
Q
J
a
w
a
U
N
Z
J
L?
r
W
D
Z
W
Q
D
W
N
O
a
O
a
W ¢
L < S
Z ? M F ?i
9 o r :
t
?j
C/)
a V
.?
O ?n
l
w
lfl
lllll II
l
ll
F l
cr'
o
w /\
N 1
W Y
•
9
Z
0
J
W b
(n Y
z
0
f=
J
Wb
c:
O J
2:
3 >
?W b
b F 16- W
In
Z
Q
J
a
z
O
a
w
J
W
H
H
Z
CW
G
Z
CW
G
Q
W
O
a
O
CL
Z O
0
r
J
W b
3x
4cZ'
i
? ?Y
o„?nn tar•a++ 4703 -
. w??+sQa?? jQS.7 = YJDS3NNIMW73/dHJIH 1
31VCI.N ll ld SdOHS '3Hl
w
0
R>
1
a
J
H
..0
H
Z
W
D
Z"
W .
2
W
IL
O.
a.
„ ? - ? ? ??