Loading...
07-11-94 agenda• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, JULY 11, 1994 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER I. MEETING WITH RICHFIELD SISTER CITY COMMISSION COUNCIL LETTER NO. 189 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS CALL TO ORDER • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE (1) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION OF JUNE 27, 1994 AND (2) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE , 1994 a!l PRESENTATION 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR PERSONS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA 2. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION AND CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION FOR RICHFIELD AND HEREDIA, COSTA RICA SOCCER ASSOCIATIONS COUNCIL LETTER NO. 190 AGENDA APPROVAL 3. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR • AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. 4A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR NEW COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSES FOR SUDS 'N SCISSORS, 6324 PILLSBURY AVENUE C.L. 191 B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSE FOR AIRPORT PET HOSPITAL, 6301 CEDAR AVENUE C.L. 192 C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSE FOR ANIMAL CARE CLINIC, 6521 CEDAR AVENUE C.L. 193 PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW INTERMITTENT HOMELESS SHELTER AT HOPE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 7132 PORTLAND AVENUE COUNCIL LETTER NO. 194 6. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR AMENDED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW SCREENING OF BALCONIES AT LAKE SHORE DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS, 6615 LAKE SHORE DRIVE COUNCIL LETTER NO. 195 • 7. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW DAYCARE CENTER FOR UP TO 120 CHILDREN AT ASSUMPTION CHURCH, 305 EAST 77TH STREET COUNCIL LETTER NO. 196 PROPOSED ORDINANCES 8. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 815 OF CITY CODE RELATED TO USE OF STREETS, SPECIFICALLY SEASONAL LOAD LIMIT REGULATIONS COUNCIL LETTER NO. 197 9. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE VACATING PORTION OF WEST 77TH STREET COUNCIL LETTER NO. 198 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS & OTHER BUSINESS 10. CONSIDERATION OF PRIORITY AND FUNDING FOR STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS COUNCIL LETTER NO. 199 40 • AIRPORT BUSINESS 11. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT 77TH STREET PROJECT BUSINESS 12. 77TH STREET PROJECT STATUS REPORT CORRESPONDENCE 13. LEGISLATIVE REPORT COUNCIL CHOICE 14. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS 15. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS ADJOURNMENT Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at 861-9702. 0 • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 199 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Priority and funding for storm water improvement projects. Background: At the June 27, 1994 meeting, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the minor improvements identified at the meeting. In addition, the Council requested that the major projects be prioritized and that funding alternatives be presented. ? PRIORITY The staff recommends the following benefit cost priority for the major storm water improvements! 1. 77th Street Phase II - estimated cost $340,000 - benefit/cost ratio is not applicable. The cost estimates for Phase II of the 77th Street Project are now complete. The Phase II construction contract will include $240,000 in local funds; i.e., storm water utility funds for storm sewers. In addition, there is $100,000 in storm sewer work in Washington Park as part of the 77th Street Project. Therefore, an estimated • $340,000 is needed. 2. Richfield Lake Outlet - estimated cost $275,000 - benefit/cost ratio is greater than 2 when compared to temporary pumping. The homes and businesses adjacent to Richfield Lake have flood protection which is difficult to determine. Without an outlet to Richfield Lake these homes are threatened not only be a single heavy rainfall event but by sustained wet periods. In 1993, City crews pumped over five feet of water from the surface of Richfield Lake. If the rainfall that generated the five feet of water had fallen in a shorter time frame, pumps may not have kept up and homes would have been threatened. Land locked lakes are not dependable and so are inappropriate elements of a storm water system. For this reason, the Richfield Lake outlet is the highest priority project. However, until the Wood Lake outlet is constructed, problems at Richfield Lake are transferred to Wood Lake if the Richfield Lake outlet is constructed. 3. 69th/70th Penn/Russell - estimated cost $750,000 - benefit/cost ratio is greater than 1 when area-wide benefits are considered. The proposed plan for a holding pond in the 6900 block of Penn Avenue provides relief not only for the homes in the 6900 block of Penn and Russell Avenue, but provides increased protection for the entire watershed west of Wood Lake between 66th and 70th Streets. • Staff believes that such widespread benefit makes this project rank high in priority. /0'/ 4. Wood Lake Dredging - estimated cost $250,000 - benefit/cost 0 ratio is not available. The sedimentation of Wood Lake has been occurring over the 20 plus years since Wood Lake was dredged. This sedimentation and eutrification has a cumulative effect which needs to be periodically arrested by dredging. Although necessary eventually, staff has scheduled the work for 1996 in the Capital Improvement Program and place it in a lower priority than 2 and 3 above. 5. 69th and Columbus - estimated cost $330,000 - benefit/cost ratio is approaching 1 when area-wide benefits to the Norby Pond drainage area are considered. Residents from this neighborhood recently contacted City staff and reported that they were damaged by the July 1, 1993 storm. According to the 1988 Orr-Schelen-Mayeron and Associates drainage study, this area is threatened by storms with greater than 2% chance of occurrence. The construction of a separate storm sewer outlet to Legion Lake is the recommended improvement. 6. Street Flooding Improvement Projects - estimated cost $1,700,000 - benefit/cost ratio is difficult to calculate because of the extent of speculation that must be taken into account; i.e., number of vehicles on the street at the time of • the storm, time of day of the storm, and so forth. As a group, the projects identified to reduce street flooding have a low (far less than 1) benefit cost ratio so these projects receive a lower priority. When addressed individually, some of these projects may have benefits which will make the projects feasible. The projects can be addressed on a case-by-case basis after the first five priorities are addressed. Benefit/cost ratios cannot be determined for the grant program until specific improvements are identified. However, the engineering consultant and staff agree that the kind of improvements expected for eligible properties (less than 1% protection) provide efficient use of stormwater utility capital funds. ? FUNDING ALTERNATIVES The attached Storm Water Capital Improvement Funds worksheet has been revised to include the 77th Street Phase II storm sewer costs. The following alternatives are available to increase available revenue or accelerate the schedule: a. The utility fee can be increased. An additional $1 per quarter per single family lot will generate an additional $93,000 per year or $465,000 over five years. b. The Storm Water Utility could borrow from an internal fund. Several funds have fund balance available to a level to afford • making of a loan. /®-,), c. Funding from outside agencies is being pursued. City staff has been discussing present and future drainage impacts of I-35W on Richfield (Richfield Lake, Wood Lake and Legion Lake in particular). One way for the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to compensate Richfield for dealing with the roadway runoff is for MnDOT to pay for improvements such as the Richfield Lake outlet and Wood Lake dredging. It will be another six months or more before any response can be expected from MnDOT. Recommended Motion: 1. Increase the storm utility rate by $1 per quarter per single family lot. 2. Aggressively pursue MnDOT for compensation related to drainage impacts. 3. Purchase homes in the 69th and Penn area based on a priority basis of "most vulnerable first." 4. Begin a grant program in 1995 for up to $50,000 per year, to be adjusted annually, based on criteria established prior to January 1, 1995. 5. Continue to consider storm water improvements as part of the Capital Improvement Program process. • Basis of Recommendation: 1. Concern has been expressed about the level of storm water protection in the community. 2. A revised Stormwater Capital Policy has been adopted. 3. A plan, based on the policy, should be implemented. 4. The Council has requested a budget and priority listing of pending proposed projects prior to adopting a Stormwater Capital Plan. 5. A $1 increase in the storm utility will place Richfield on the high end of utility fees in the metropolitan area. However, this is a reflection of the City's decision to aggressively pursue increased storm water protection for the community. 6. The City is in continuing communication with MnDOT on traffic and transportation related issues. Storm water and drainage impacts are part of the communication. 7. The Council annually reviews and adopts a Capital Improvement Program. This permits opportunity to review a Stormwater Capital Plan on at least an annual basis. 0 /®-3 Alternative Recommendation: 1. Do not adopt a plan. 2. Adopt a storm utility rate higher or lower than $1 per quarter per single family lot. 3. Borrow from an internal fund to expedite the program. 4. Begin a grant program at some time other than January 1995 or begin a grant program at a level higher or lower than $50,000 annually. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is on the July 11, 1994 Council agenda. Respe 1 y submitted, James Prosser City nager JDP:cak E /D-? • Revised 7/11/94 STORM WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS REVENUE Cash Balance 12/31/93 *Annual revenue available for capital expenditures Balance available for capital projects December 1994 December 1998 (assumes $195,000 per year) $ 444,000 IS 195,000 $ 639,000 $1,419,000 EXPENSES • $ 340,000 $ 275,000 $ 750,000 $ 250,000 6601 Stevens $ 22,000 7632 Logan $ 15,000 6645 Queen $ 7,500 ** $1,659,500 * Assumes $7.55 quarterly single family fee, no interest revenue, $700,000 annual revenues, $307,000 in maintenance, $198,000 bond payment. ** Grant program not included. Street flooding and 6900 block of Columbus not included. Note: An additional $1 per quarter per single family lot will generate an additional $93,000 per year or $465,000 over five years. 77th Street Phase II Richfield Lake outlet (revised) 1995 CIP 6900 blocks of Penn/Russell Wood Lake dredging 1996 CIP n LJ • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.198 July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: First reading consideration of an ordinance vacating a portion of West 77th Street. Background: The relocation of 77th Street to link up with 76th Street has resulted in the nonuse of a triangular area east of Emerson Street, north of the Emerson Avenue Congregational Church and south of the new 77th Street. It is necessary to vacate this portion of 77th Street in order to put the land to appropriate use. Recommended Motion: Approve first reading of a transitory ordinance to vacate, subject to easements, a portion of West 77th Street, and set a second reading and public hearing for July 25, 1994. Basis of Recommendation: 1. This land is not usable for roadway purposes but is suitable for open space and landscaping. 2. For this land to be available, it is necessary for the City Council to initiate the vacation of this portion of the old • 77th Street. 3. The vacation would be subject to existing utility easements. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Delay this vacation at first reading. 2. Continue first reading of the vacation. Discussion/Decision Mode: First reading consideration of the transitory ordinance is scheduled for July 11, 1994. No mailed or published notice is required for first reading. If first reading is approved, a public hearing and second reading will be held on July 25, 1994. Respectfull-y submitted, James rosser n ger City e* JDP:cak 0 JUL 07 '94 14:04 HOLMES & GRAVEN ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACA'T'ING A PORTION OF 77TH STREET WEST, NEAR THE RECONSTRUCTED INTERSECTION OF EMERSON AVENUE NORTH AND 77TH STREET WEST THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: P.2 Section 1. The following described land is subject to an easement for public street purposes: Whose parts of: 77th Street West lying between the centerline of Dupont Avenue South and the west line of Emerson Avenue South, located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota and 77th Street West, as dedicated in the plat of NORTHFELT ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota • Being described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 33; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Northeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter 86.58 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence northwesterly 187.04 feet along a non-tangential curare concave to the northeast having a radius of 610.33 feet and a central angle of 17 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds, the chord of said curve bears North 63 degrees 29 minutes 13 seconds West; thence South 38 degrees 06 minutes 35 seconds West, not tangent to said curve, 32.47 feet; thence southerly along a tangen- tial curve concave to the east having a radius of 320.00 feet to the south line of said Northeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter; thence southerly 30 feet along the easterly right of way line of Emerson Avenue to the southerly right of way line of 77th Street west; thence easterly along said southerly right of way line of 77th Street west to the southerly extension of the centerline of Dupont Avenue South; thence northwest- erly to the point of beginning. Sec. 2. Due to the relocation and reconstruction of 77th Street West in the vicinity of Emerson Avenue North, there is no 1 JUL 07 '94 14:05 HOLMES & GRAVEN P.3 • longer a public need for a street easement over the above-described property. Sec. 3. The street easement in favor of the public over the above-described property is hereby vacated. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk 0 2 6[Do Cn "3AV XVd'100 III W ti 0 0 4 [-,,jP .•3" [DIE' I !`I 1 t f N { W _ = fl1 V/ .J .. .. V U ,w ti W -° w Q cr. Q W a c? = W a co O W N U III i ii V, I C I I ' II I . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 197 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: First reading of an ordinance amending Section 815 of the City Code related to use of streets, specifically seasonal load limit regulations. Background: Section 815.01 addresses seasonal load limit regulations. The proposed ordinance amendment to Subdivision 815.5 is a housekeeping matter to exempt solid waste collectors and recyclers. The proposed ordinance amendment to Subdivision 815.6 eliminates the bond now required and requires, instead, a per load fee. The fee would be established annually during the Council's budget considerations. Since the type of damage caused by overweight loads is cumulative in effect and a change in street condition is seldom visible after only a few repetitions, bonding for this type of damage is not effective. A fee will provide 1) funds for maintaining streets and 2) a financial deterrent to those who wish to use a permit for "conducting business as usual." It is staff's opinion that the best way to protect Richfield streets during seasonal load restrictions is to severely limit or prevent overweight • loads. A minor fee, proposed to be $20 per load in 1995 if the Council agrees to the proposed ordinance amendment, will allow for emergency types of overweight loads but will tend to force others to wait until seasonal load restrictions are removed after the streets are more stable. In 1994, about 25 waivers, involving 50 to 60 loads, were granted. Recommended Motion: Approve first reading of the ordinance amendment to 1) exempt solid waste collectors and recyclers from seasonal load limits and 2) replace the bond requirement with a per load fee to be determined during the annual budget process, and set a public hearing date and second reading for August 8, 1994. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Amending the ordinance as proposed is in the best interest of the community. 2. Approval of a first reading of the ordinance at this time would enable the Council to consider a 1995 fee during coming budget hearings. Alternative Recommendation: Council could choose to delay a first reading of the ordinance amendment; however, this may mean that any ordinance amendment • would not be in effect in time for the hearings on the 1995 budget. Y"I Discussion/Decision Mode: First reading is scheduled for the July 11, 1994, Council meeting. Respec ully submitted, James Prosser City M ager JDP:cak Attachment C? U Y,z BILL NO. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 815 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: 1. Subsection 815.01 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield entitled "Seasonal load regulations" is hereby amended by adding (or deleting) the following: 815.01. Seasonal load regulations. Subd. 5. Exceptions. The restrictions contained in subdivision 4 do not apply to: (a) emergency vehicles; (b) vehicles of a public utility used in making repairs to its plant and equipment; sr (c) any county or state highway within the city.- ; or (d) vehicles operated by solid waste collectors and recyclers being at the time used by the operator for the purpose of collecting solid waste and recyclable materials. Subd. 6. Special authorization: bond. If a person desires to use an alley, street or public highway of the city in a manner not authorized by reason of the prohibitions or restrictions imposed by this section, the director may, in his discretion, grant permission upon such conditions as he may prescribe, provided that the person shall first furnish to he e-ity-a?bond ?izi--ai?aii.9u. cc.?y the director with good and suf f ieient eerper-ate-surety, guaranteeing o Seeure t amount ?therev?to be aunrAv- i eater. in lieu of a m e direeter. request a seasonal load limit exemption from the director and pay_a fee in amount established by the city council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 1994. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 196 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Request for a conditional use permit to allow a daycare center for up to 120 children at 305 East 77th Street. Background: New Horizon Child Care is proposing to operate a daycare center in the school wing of Assumption Church, 305 East 77th Street. Classrooms would be leased to New Horizon contingent upon City approval. New Horizon currently operates out of St. Richard's Church, 7540 Penn Avenue. A consolidation of parish schools will result in all of Assumption's school operations being moved to St. Richard's. The need for more space at St. Richard's because of the consolidation will require New Horizon to move out of St. Richard's. In turn, New Horizon would move into the space being vacated at Assumption because of the consolidation. The request would allow up to 120 children; however, New Horizon anticipates starting out with about 60 children and gradually increasing enrollment. Hours of operation would be from 6:30 • a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Assumption's school had an enrollment of about 160 students during the 1993-1994 school year. The Assumption Church site is zoned C-2, where daycare centers for more than 12 children are permitted with a conditional use permit. Recommended Motion: Approve the conditional use permit to allow a daycare center for up to 120 children at 305 East 77th Street with the following stipulations. 1. That the applicable State license be approved. 2. That all building and fire codes be met prior to occupancy. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Adequate on-site parking is available. 2. Adequate play area would be provided per State licensing requirements. 3. The site complies with drainage and landscaping requirements. 4. The designated drop-off and pick-up area is located on-site, close to the entrance door. • 5. On June 28, 1994, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposal. TI Alternative Recommendation: Deny the request with a finding that the proposal would have adverse impacts on adjacent properties or the City as a whole. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled at 7:00 p.m, on Monday, July 11, 1994. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. Notice of hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Respectf ly submitted, (rV James . Prosser City M ger JDP:cak r 1 U U 0 W Q N 3nN3AY ONa ?a.Z? ZZ ?I eNol ?I Z .JIFF W I- Cn a? N Cn C Q W LO O M O? d 00 k s O ? Ql) l 9 - 0 s -? r J W ? of .. ?o N o } J l l ? J /? Q -2 O N .i[ •r j (I J J va ? S ? ? J .r O .r as ?r r. 0 0 as r M Y C L V W V J r O J a f1 M A Y W Z +> V 3 N r s Q f O c? M M M It JUN-27-94 MON 14:38 NEW HORIZON ENTERPRISES FAX NO, 612 557 1257 P,02 ... JUN - T-94 TUE 12 L21-?3pU j 6i3I MG KNV I hilC P X02 i fo? • t y~ - t?Jcs°f- si calms , is f sforl bryrrk bldg`. w ah 1011 joie A • lp 0 0 C) k oc?C, -vfon ??I 916xre6 4pli5 'o fjorms AIP4, '%?Vr F, I u- ? -tt' ?a b b a 1?j e 4" 1o"?tt? b b • m o t yr GuAS 1 e ?v m v O a 4 0 0 eKktr z. vroitY $K;dp &p6.. , V/ • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 195 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Request for an amended final development plan/conditional use permit to allow screening of balconies at Lake Shore Drive Condominiums, 6615 Lake Shore Drive. Background: Lake Shore .Drive condominium owners are seeking approval to enclose their balconies with a screen. Ten owners are petitioners and believe screening will make their balconies more functional and enjoyable. The Homeowners Association Board of Directors has passed a motion to allow screening contingent on City approval. In July 1993, the Council approved a similar request for Woodlake Point Condominiums, 6500 Woodlake Drive. As a result of the success of that project, Lake Shore Drive Condominiums are also requesting blanket approval to give all owners the option to screen their balconies if they wish, conditioned on meeting specific design criteria. Recommended Motion: Approve the amended final development plan/conditional use permit • for Lake Shore Drive Condominiums to allow installation of balcony screening enclosures for those owners who want them, with the following stipulations: 1. That all screens comply with the specific design and installation criteria, as outlined in the application. 2. That blinds, drapes, shades, or other similar items not be hung on the screens. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The screening enclosures would help to solve pigeon and insect problems, making balconies more functional and enjoyable. 2. The screening enclosures are designed to be identical looking and of high quality materials so they do not compromise the visual appearance of the building. The screening and frame would be mounted inside the balcony railing to maintain the rhythm of the facade. 3. The frame for the screening enclosure would be constructed of bronze colored anodized aluminum to match the existing window frames. 04. The frame would be rigidly attached to the balcony floor and would provide drain holes to dispose of trapped water. . 5. The screens would not be operable; however, they would be removable with special tools. 6. The black fiberglass screening material would be tightly knit to prevent as much snow sift as possible. 7. Blanket approval would allow additional units to be screened in the future without further PUD review; however, all individual screening enclosures would require a building permit from the City prior to installation. 8. On June 28, 1994, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposal. Alternative Recommendation: Deny the request with a finding that the proposal would have an adverse impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, July 11, 1994. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. Notice of hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. • JDP:cak Respect ly submitted, James D Prosser City M ager 0 5 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 194 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Request for a conditional use permit to allow an intermittent homeless shelter at Hope Presbyterian Church, 7132 Portland Avenue. Background: Hope Presbyterian Church is proposing to join the Interfaith Hospitality Network (IHN). The IHN is a nation-wide organization which works with churches and synagogues to provide short-term shelter for families in crisis situations, as opposed to chronically homeless. The IHN does not serve those actively abusing drugs or alcohol, those with severe mental illness, or those fleeing physical abuse. Social service agencies screen the families before referring them to the IHN. Host churches and synagogues provide this service four weeks out of each year. The families would be housed in classrooms of Hope Presbyterian's school addition. There would be up to 16 people at a time. The stay would be from Sunday to Sunday. During weekdays, families would be at the church from about 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. the following day. Days would be spent either at work, school, the activity center, or looking for permanent housing. While at the church, families would have use of the church facilities including the gym, showers, and courtyard. The church would also provide meals for the families during their stay. Bus transportation is provided to the families by the IHN. Recommended Motion: Approve the conditional use permit to allow Hope Presbyterian Church to operate an intermittent homeless shelter (Interfaith Hospitality Network) with the following stipulations: 1. That the shelter be limited to operate a maximum of four weeks per year and no more than two weeks per quarter. 2. That no more than 16 persons be served by the shelter at one time. 3. That the shelter not serve those actively abusing drugs or alcohol, those with severe mental illness, or those fleeing physical abuse. 4. That meals for those served by the shelter be prepared on- site. 5. That all building, fire, and health codes be met prior to operation. 5-1 Basis of Recommendation: 1. On June 13, 1994, the City Council reviewed the proposed use and determined that it be classified as a "conditional" church accessory use. 2. The shelter would provide secure housing on a short term basis for families in crisis situations. 3. It appears the shelter would not impose adverse impacts on the neighborhood or the City as a whole. A number of general complaints against church operations were voiced at the Planning Commission hearing. The issues included parking across driveways of neighbors, parking on Portland Avenue on Sundays, use of the parking lot at all hours, car headlights impacting neighbors, pedestrian shortcuts and noise. It was suggested by staff that mediation would be an appropriate forum for the discussion of those issues. 4. Minor building improvements (e.g., hard wired smoke detectors) are required prior to operation. 5. On June 28, 1994, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit. Alternative Recommendation: Deny the request with a finding that the proposal would have an • adverse impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, July 11, 1994. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. Notice of hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. Respectfully submitted, Jam Prosser City nager JDP:cak 5-- g-- • PROPOSED MASTER PLAN - GROUND LEVEL Hope Presbyterian Church, Richfield, Minnesota H ac O I I ! 'i i i -1- ----? ; ADULT EDUCATION/ i l i i I? i -s-MEETING ROOMS r - - r-1 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES E fTNCiUAfY?: -_ ADULT EDUCATION/ I L?MEETING ROOMS 1 OUTREACH MINISTRIES - 1,q NARTHEX - -- i t dI t{ i ?'?a LINKAGE( V ' .FUTUV NT )W E I ! I I S I i I 4: I J YOUTH I SOCVENTS ` MINISTRIES . ; ------- _' tl KIT }1EKT III _ I I I I ? I I I ! j - I I I" ? { •. i a I ASV St AGE Rwo E CENTER j III I ?'`;I ?' I i I I r: f MINI T IES FAWI"t ?. I C MIRISTR?S , -; _ 'i I i i f 338 TOTAL CARS - ' i I 1 I- f NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS ONLY TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE CLASSROOMS USED FOR IHN IN RELATION TO THE OVERALL CHURCH PROPERTY. I C • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.193 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a commercial kennel license for Animal Care Clinic, 6521 Cedar Avenue. Background: On May 26,.1994, Animal Care Clinic submitted an application for the renewal of their commercial kennel license. On June 9, 1994, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a commercial kennel license be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with the City Codes pertaining to a commercial kennel license. 2. The City has previously issued a kennel license to Animal Care Clinic. • Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny the request for a commercial kennel license. However, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a commercial kennel license for Animal Care Clinic, 6521 Cedar Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Resp fully submitted, Jame D Prosser City a ger JDP:cak 0 • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 192 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a commercial kennel license for Airport Pet Hospital, 6301 Cedar Avenue. Background: On May 25, 1994, Airport Pet Hospital submitted an application for the renewal of their commercial kennel license. On May 26, 1994, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a commercial kennel license be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with the City Codes pertaining to a commercial kennel license. 2. The City has previously issued a kennel license to Airport Pet Hospital. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny the request for a commercial kennel license. However, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a commercial kennel license for Airport Pet Hospital, 6301 Cedar Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respect ly submitted, rosser Jam4Mager City JDP:cak 0 ?A • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 191 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a new commercial kennel license for Suds 'N Scissors Inc., 6324 Pillsbury Avenue. Background: On June 1,.1994, Suds 'N Scissors submitted an application for a new commercial kennel license. On June 9, 1994, an inspection of the property was conducted by a. Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a commercial kennel license be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with the City Codes pertaining to a commercial kennel license. Alternative Recommendation: • 1. The Council could decide to deny the request for a new commercial kennel license. However, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a new commercial kennel license for Suds IN Scissors Inc., 6324 Pillsbury Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respe ully submitted, Jame . Prosser City nager JDP:cak 16 z . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.190 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Proclamation and Certificate of Recognition for the Richfield and Heredia, Costa Rica soccer associations. Background: The Richfield Soccer Association is fielding a team in the U.S.A. Cup 194 Soccer Tournament at the National Sports Center in Blaine, Minnesota the week of July 11. Richfield's Sister City of Heredia, Costa Rica is represented by a team from the Escuela de Futbol of Llorente de Flores in Heredia. The Certificate of Recognition for the Richfield Soccer Association is to credit their efforts in providing homestays for the Costa Rican team, coaches and chaperones, as well as recognizing their representation of the City of Richfield in international competition. The proclamation bestows honorary citizenship in the City of Richfield, Minnesota upon the players, coaches and chaperones representing Sister City Heredia, Costa Rica in the U.S.A. Cup '94 Soccer Tournament. • Recommended Motion: Read the proclamation and present the certificates. Discussion/Decision Mode: These proclamations are an agenda item for the Regular City Council meeting on July 11, 1994. Respectfully submitted, James Prosser City anager JDP:cak Copy: Sister City Commission Chair CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.189 Agenda July 11, 1994 Issue Statement: Meeting with the Richfield Sister City Commission. Background: The Special City Council meeting with the Sister City Commission is one of a series of meetings between the City's Boards and Commissions and the City Council. The purpose of this special meeting is to provide an informal opportunity for Commission Members to inform the City Council of recent and current projects. It also provides a forum for an open dialogue between the City Council and the Commission. Projects to be discussed include: 1. Companie Folclorica dancers; 2. Chamber of Commerce project; 3. Presentation of books; 4. Soccer project; and, 5. Current situation in Heredia, Costa Rica. Recommended Motion: There is no action recommended. Discussion/Decision Mode: This special meeting has been scheduled for July 11, 1994 and is one of a series of meetings. Respect ly submitted, ser James D feors City Ma JDP :cak Copy: Sister City Commission Chair •