Loading...
07-27-92 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, JULY 27, 1992 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to the RULES OF PROCEDURE AND DECORUM OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the following times and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. A) PUBLIC HEARINGS: Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings, all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the RULES OF PROCEDURE AND DECORUM OF THE CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA: Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item NOT on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting for specific items on the agenda, this portion of the meeting will be limited to thirty (30) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued under Other Business at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, state the subject to be discussed and state who the speaker is representing if representing an organization or other persons. All remarks shall be addressed to the • Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to enter into any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. No question may be asked a Council Member or a member of the staff without the permission of the presiding officer. Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at 861-9702. Your participation, as prescribed by the Council's RULES, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF (1) CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION OF JULY 13, 1992 AND (2) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 13, 1992 PRESENTATIONS 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR PERSONS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA 2. PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION TO MIKE FARRELL 3. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING AUGUST 4, 1992 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IN RICHFIELD 4. PRESENTATION OF THE 1992 MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION AWARD OF EXCELLENCE FOR FRIENDS OF WOOD LAKE COUNCIL LETTER NO. 170 AGENDA APPROVAL 5. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. 6A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION AND AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF PROPERTY, 7645 11TH AVENUE; 77TH STREET PROJECT C.L. 171 B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RICHFIELD AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (LELS) LOCAL 123 BARGAINING UNIT FOR YEARS 1992, 1993 AND 1994 C.L. 172 C. CONSIDERATION OF APPPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH ONETIME EARLY RETIREMENT/HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN CITY OF RICHFIELD EMPLOYEES C.L. 173 D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF REQUEST BY CHURCH OF ASSUMPTION • FOR ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE, ITINERANT PLACE OF AMUSEMENT LICENSE AND ITINERANT FOOD LICENSE WITH FEE WAIVER FOR 1992 FUN FEST ON AUGUST 15 AND 16, 1992 C.L. 174 E. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF NEW ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR PAISAN INCORPORATED d/b/a KHAN'S MONGOLIAN BARBEQUE, 500 EAST 78TH STREET C.L. 175 F. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF BID MINUTES/TABULATION AND AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR 1992 SEALCOATING PROJECT TO ALLIED BLACKTOP, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,174.40 C.L. 176 G. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION-LYNDALE AVENUE AND 76TH STREET, TO MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $147,609.90 C.L. 177 H. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSE, WOODLAKE VETERINARY HOSPITAL, 6436 LYNDALE AVENUE C.L. 178 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING RENEWAL OF RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE, 6732 11TH AVENUE, 4 DOGS (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 22, 1992) COUNCIL LETTER NO. 179 8. PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 864, 1991 ALLEY MAINTENANCE FOR PERIOD JANUARY 1, • 1991 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 180 9. PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 862, LHN MAINTENANCE FOR PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1991 10 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 181 10. PUBLIC HEARING TO ADOPT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 863, ILN MAINTENANCE FOR PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1991 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 182 11. PUBLIC HEARING ON ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1991 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1991 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 183 12. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SPECIALLY ASSESSING CURRENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR CITY ALLEYS FOR PERIOD OF JANUARY-1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1993, CITY PROJECT NO. 883 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 184 13. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SPECIALLY ASSESSING LHN AREA FOR CURRENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1993, CITY PROJECT NO. 881 • COUNCIL LETTER NO. 185 14. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER SPECIALLY ASSESSING ILN AREA FOR CURRENT MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1993, CITY PROJECT NO. 874 COUNCIL LETTER NO. 186 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS & OTHER BUSINESS AIRPORT BUSINESS 15. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT CORRESPONDENCE 16. LEGISLATIVE REPORT COUNCIL CHOICE 17. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS 18. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS 0 ADJOURNMENT `I CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 40 Council Letter No. 170 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Presentation of•the 1992 Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) Award of Excellence for Friends of Wood Lake (FOWL). Background: The MRPA annually presents awards to communities who have had outstanding programs, projects, facilities, or volunteer efforts/sponsorship completed in the preceeding year. This year the Community Services Department, Wood Lake Nature Center Division submitted a nomination for the 1991 founding of the Friends of Wood Lake (FOWL), including the first annual dinner and twentieth anniversary celebration. Nominations are judged on planning, funding sources, inter-agency cooperation, community support, originality and evaluation. FOWL received high points in all categories from the MRPA Awards Committee. An MRPA member will be presenting the award to Bernie Mittlesteadt, FOWL`Vice Chair. Members of the FOWL Board and members of the Community Services Commission have been invited to attend. Recommended Motion: Accept the award as presented to FOWL. Basis of Recommendation: FOWL members and subcommittee members have provided countless volunteer hours and effort to raise funds for Wood Lake Nature Center. Their efforts have prompted MRPA to present the 1992 Award of Excellence to the Richfield Community Services Department for Friends of Wood Lake. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is scheduled for the July 27 City Council meeting. submitted, Respecyageor James sser City M JDP:ds 0 / ti CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • Council Letter No. 171 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Adoption of resolution establishing just compensation and authorizing the purchase of property with an owner who is experiencing a hardship; 7645 11th Avenue. Background: MnDOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) procedures recognize property owners who are experiencing a hardship. Until the project plans are approved, it is possible to purchase "hardship property" with specific state and federal approval. This process makes it possible to purchase property using project funds. It is no longer necessary to purchase property using RALF. This new option makes it possible to respond more quickly to owners as RALF was a six to nine month process. Several weeks ago, a list of hardship acquisitions was submitted to MnDOT for review with FHWA. MnDOT has indicated review and approval of the request is imminent. At the July 13 meeting, the City Council took this action on four other hardship properties. This is the fifth and last property to be presented as a hardship. The property has been appraised in accordance with MnDOT and FHWA procedures and standards. The resulting value is $110,000 for this single family home. Preliminary estimates for relocation for this property is $13,000. If project plan approval is forthcoming within the next several weeks, there would be no additional hardship requests. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution which, subject to MnDOT and FHWA approval, does the following: 1. Sets just compensation and authorizes staff to negotiate and purchase the property at the value indicated. 2. Authorizes the City Manager and Mayor to execute a purchase agreement in the amount of just compensation. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Approval of the hardship application by MnDOT and FHWA is imminent. 2. MnDOT and FHWA appraisal procedures were followed. 3. Project funds are available. • Alternative Recommendation: Do not set the purchase price and authorize purchase. A Discussion/Decision Mode: Approval will make it possible to ease the owner's hardships. Respectjrglly submitted, Jame Prosser Cit natter JDP:ds • U &A_Z RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION, AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY 7645 11TH AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota desires to purchase certain real property pursuant to and in furtherance of the 77th Street Project (Project) heretofore adopted by the City of Richfield (City) said real property being described as follows: Lot 9, Block 1, South Murray Lane, 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the City has adopted an official map for improvements to 77th Street; and WHEREAS, the improvements to 77th Street necessitate the purchase of real estate; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes to acquire real property within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are funding this project; and • WHEREAS, MnDOT and FHWA procedures provide for purchase of property when the owner is experiencing a hardship; and WHEREAS, recognition by MnDOT and FHWA of these properties as "hardship" has been requested and such recognition is imminent; and WHEREAS, the City has caused an appraisal of the subject property to be made by a qualified independent professional real estate appraiser to determine fair market value; and WHEREAS, a qualified review appraiser has certified the appraisal report as to conformity with appraisal standards and has certified same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That just compensation is determined to be as follows: $110,000. 2. That the City Manager is authorized and directed to commence negotiations for the purchase of said real property following MnDOT and FHWA approval. 3. That the City Manager and Mayor are authorized to execute a Purchase Agreement for the amount of just compensation set forth in this resolution. 6R-3 4. That the City Manager is hereby directed to notify, in writing, the owner of subject property as soon as possible that the City intends to acquire his/her property and establish eligibility for relocation benefits. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk ID be) CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 172 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Approval of the 1992-94 labor contract with the Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS), Local 123. Background: City staff has completed negot Officers Federation on a Labor period of 1992, 1993 and 1994, LELS, Local 123 represents the Investigator/Agent. There are unit. iations with the Richfield Police Agreement for the three-year. subject to Council approval. positions of Police Officer and 34 employees represented in the The entire contract was open for negotiations. Discussion centered around: wages; health insurance; Injury on Duty Leave; clothing allowance; court on call time; number of paid holidays; and numerous other issues. The tentatively approved settlement includes the following changes: • Wages 1992 2% increase 1993 3% increase 1994 Reopener across-the board across-the-board effective 1/1/92 and 1% increase across-the-board effective 7/1/92 Health $20 increase per $25 increase per Reopener Insurance month toward month toward dependent dependent coverage coverage effective 3/1/92 Dental $2 increase per $2 increase per Reopener Insurance month for single month for single coverage coverage Clothing $20 increase per $20 increase per Allowance employee per year employee per year for Police Officers Agents to be brought to the same level as Officers (08-1 Injury-on- May be extended Duty Leave an additional 90 days at the Director's sole discretion In addition, several minor language changes were made to update the contract. Recommended Motion: Approve the Labor Agreement with the LELS, Local 123 and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The City has met and negotiated with the Union and is bound under the Public Employers Labor Relations Act to meet and bargain over the terms and conditions of employment. 2. The tentatively approved settlement is similar to police unit agreements in other, comparable cities and other City employee groups. Alternative Recommendation: Do not approve the terms of the agreement requiring further negotiation and/or arbitration. . Discussion/Decision Mode: In order to allow the City's accounting personnel to modify payroll records in a timely manner for 1992 wages and benefits, it is recommended that the City Council act on July 27, 1992 to adopt the attached resolution providing for contract changes effective January 1, 1992. ectfully submitted, Jam s D. Prosser Manager JDP:ds Attachment • &6-3 9 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHFIELD AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (LELS), LOCAL 123 BARGAINING UNIT FOR THE YEARS 1992, 1993 AND 1994 WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Richfield Police Officers Federation have reached an understanding concerning conditions of employment for the years 1992, 1993 and 1994; and WHEREAS, it would be inappropriate to penalize LELS members who have negotiated in good faith; and WHEREAS, the personnel ordinance requires that contracts between the City and the exclusive representative'of the employees in an appropriate bargaining unit shall be implemented by Council resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Labor Agreement between the City.of Richfield and LELS local 123 Bargaining Unit for the years 1992, 1993 and 1994 under the provisions of the Labor Agreement to be implemented, effective January 1, 1992. 0 Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk 0 6c, CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 173 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Adoption of a resolution to establish a one-time early retirement/health insurance program for certain City of Richfield employees. Background: The 1992 Minnesota Legislature adopted an early retirement incentive provision for public employees (House File 2694, Article 4, Sections 58 and 59). That provision is very restrictive. Accordingly, under the law, the City may provide employer paid medical benefits only to an employee who: 1. currently is eligible for employer paid health insurance; 2. has at least 25 years of continuous service with the City; 3. is immediately eligible for a retirement annuity from either PERA, PERA Police and Fire Fund or a Police or Fire Relief Association Retirement Program; and 4. is at least 55 and not yet 65 years of age and retires on or after July 1, 1992 and before October 1, 1992. Under these very restrictive guidelines, six City employees would meet the early retirement criteria. However, it is critical to emphasize that the continuation of the employer paid health insurance benefit is specific to this legislative window period only. Health insurance contributions would continue by the city for the eligible employees under COBRA continuation. On January 1, 1993, the health insurance contributions would continue by the City for eligible employees under the recent provisions of Chapter 488 of the Laws of Minnesota. The legislation allows for retirement of certain employees without penalty and encourages such retirement as a solution to some of the budgetary restraints currently experienced by municipalities. It is only in that context that the City is examining this option. The savings from the early retirements would be used to pay.for the health insurance contributions. City-wide, the early retirements of this limited nature should render a net cost savings to the City. Though, individually that may not be the case for each early retirement case. Recommended Motion: Adopt the attached resolution for employer paid health insurance for early retirees limited to the legislative open-window period • as prescribed by law. 6 C-1 Basis for Recommendation: 1. The 1992 Minnesota Legislature specifically provided an early retirement incentive to save cities money. 2. The City is able to continue its contribution under COBRA and effective January 1, 1993 under Chapter 488 of the Laws of Minnesota. 3. It is in the best interest of certain retirees to have a qualified health insurance plan to facilitate an early retirement. • 4. There is an opportunity for budget savings overall by using this early retirement incentive window. Alternative Recommendation: The City Council may choose not to approve the resolution establishing a formal early retirement health insurance program window. Discussion/Decision Mode: If the City Council wishes to utilize would be necessary for the Council to this item so information may be given and a timely decision on retirement m, window period prescribed by law which this open-window period, it taken action quickly on to appropriate individuals 3y be made within the open- ends on October 12', 1992. Respectfully submitted, James D. Prosser Cit3, Manager JDP:ds 0 (a C a- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FORMAL EARLY RETIREMENT HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the 1992 Minnesota Legislature has adopted an early retirement incentive for public employees who meet certain criteria (House File 2694, Article 4, Sections 58 and 59; and WHEREAS, the City is able to continue health insurance contributions under COBRA continuation and on January 1, 1993 under Chapter 488 of the Laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest for certain eligible retirees to have a quality health insurance plan; and WHEREAS, there is an opportunity for the City to experience budget savings by offering this early retirement incentive. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield adopts a formal early retirement health insurance program with the following provisions pursuant to House File 2694, Article 4, Sections 58 and 59: 1. Qualified employees shall have the option of retiring and be eligible for single or dependent health insurance coverage . under the same plan and same employer contribution to which the employee was entitled immediately before retirement, subject to any changes in coverage and employer and employee contributions for employees in positions equivalent to the position from which the employee retired. 2. Health insurance eligibility ceases when the retired employee attains age 65, or when the employee chooses not to receive retirement benefits for which the employee has applied, or when the employe is eligible for employer paid health insurance from a new employer. 3. Coverages must be coordinated with relevant health insurance benefits provided through Medicare. 4. To qualify under this program, an employee: a) must be eligible for employer-paid health insurance under a collective bargaining agreement or personnel plan in effect the day before the effective date of the employee's retirement; b) must have at least 25 years of continuous service with the City of Richfield; c) upon retirement, must immediately be eligible for a PERA, • PERA Police and Fire Fund retirement annuity, or a Police or Fire Relief Association Retirement Program, without reduction of benefits because of age; ('C3 . d) is at least 55 and not yet 65 years of age; and e) retires on or after July 1, 1992, and before October 1, 1992. 5. The City may not exclude any eligible employees. 6. For purposes of this resolution, a person retires when the person terminates active employment and applies for retirement benefits. 7. Employees participate in this program on a voluntary basis. 8. The City is authorized to administer the Early Retirement Health Insurance Program and to fund this program from the General Fund. 9. The eligibility provision of this resolution shall expire on October 1, 1992. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 27th day of July, 1992. 0 ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk Martin J. Kirsch Mayor . r? U CHAPTER No. 513 I H.F. No. 2694 // lD J 1 cases arising from new criminal charges brought against indigent 2 inmates who are incarcerated in a Minnesota state correctional . 3 facility are the responsibility of the state board of public 4 defense. In such cases the state public defender may follow the 5 procedures outlined in this section for obtaining court-ordered 6 counsel. 7 Sec. 57. Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 611.27, is 8 amended by adding a subdivision to read: 9 Subd. 14. (PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES; REPORT.) The state 10 public defender shall report to the legislature in the 11 supplemental budget or the biennial budget document the number 12 and costs of all successful petitions during the previous fiscal 13 ear. 14 =ec-58- (FINDINGS.) 15 The legislature finds that the state of Minnesota faces 16 immediate and serious financial problems. As a result, public 17 employers may have insufficient resources to maintain their work 18 forces at the current level. The legislature determines that 19 the public interest is best served if public employers' budgets • 20 can be balanced without layoffs of public employees. This 21 section and section 59 are enacted as a temporary measure to 22 help solve the financial crisis facing units of state and local 23 government, while minimizing layoffs of public employees. 24 =Sec59- (EMPLOYER-PAID HEALTH INSURANCE.] 25 Subdivision 1. (STATE EMPLOYEES.) A state employee, as 26 defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 43A.02, subdivision 21, 27 or an employee of the state university system, community college 28 system, higher education board, Minnesota state retirement system, the teacherc retirement association, or the public 30 employees retirement association, is eligible for state-paid 31 hospital, medical, and dental benefits if the person: 32 (1) is eligible for state-paid insurance under Minnesota 33 Statutes, section 43A.18, or other law; 34. (2) (i) has at least 25 years of service in the state civil 35 service as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 43A.02, 36 subdivision 10; or (ii) has at least 25 years of service as an 121 i j. CHAPTER No. 513 H.F. No. 2694 • the teachers 1 em to ee of the Minnesota state retirement system, 2 retirement association, or the ublic em to ees re m credit in 3 association; or (iii) has at least 25 ears of service 4 the ublic pension plan that the erson is a member of on the 5 day. before retirement; 6 3 upon retirement is immediate) eli ible for a retirement annuity; of age; and 8 4 is at least 55 and not et 65 oars - 9 5 retires on or after Jul 1, 1992, and before October It 10 l9_ 92 1993, an executive 11 During the biennium ending June 30, state a enc may not hire a re lacement for a person who 12 branch 13 retires under this subdivision, except under conditions 14 s ecified b the commissioners of finance and employee rations. 15 ubd. 2_ [OTHER PUBLIC EMPLOYEES.] The Univers v el S 16 Minnesota or the overnin body of a city, county, school 17 district, 'oint vocational technical district formed under 18 Minnesota Statutes, sections 136C.60 to 136C.69, or other subdivision of the state ma` rovide em to er-maid 19 political 20 hospital, medical, and dental benefits to a erson who: eligible for employer- aid insurance under 21 (1 is 22 collective bar ainin agreements or ersonnel plans in effect on 23 the day before the effective date of this section; 24 (2]_ h at least 25 ears of service credit in the ublic 25 pension plan that the person is a member of onth d of atfore otal 26 retirement; or in the case of a teacher has a t least 27 25 ears of service credit in the teachers retirement 28 association, a first-class city teacher retirement fund, or an 2y combination ox cYie?_ L-^11Ps- 30 3 upon retirement is immediate) eligible for a 31 retirement annuity; 32 4 is at least 55 and not et 65 ears of age; and 33 (5 in the case of a school district em to ee, retires on 34 or after May 15, 1992, and before Jul 21, 1992; and in the cat 35 of an employee of another em to er in this subdivision, retire: 36 on or after Jul 1, 1992, and before October 1, 1992. 122 69 (- s ?r" f CHAPTER No. 613 H.F. No. 2694 C 1 An employer that pays for insurance under this subdivision 2 may not exclude any eligible employees. 3 Subd. 3. (CONDITIONS; COVERAGE.] An employee who is ?. 4 eli ible both for the health insurance benefit under this 5 section and for an earl retirement incentive under a collective 6 bargaining agreement or personnel plan established by the 7 employer must select either the earl retirement incentive in 8 the collective bargaining agreement, personnel plan, or the 9 incentive provided under this section, but may not receive 10 both. For purposes of this section, a person retires when the 11 person terminates active employment and applies for retirement 12 benefits The retired employee is eligible for single and 13 dependent coverages and employer payments to which the person 14 was entitled immediately before retirement, subject to any 15 changes in coverage and employer and employee payments through 16 collective bargaining or personnel plans, for employees in 17 positions equivalent to the position from which the employee 18 retired The retired employee is not eligible for employer-paid 19 life insurance Eligibility ceases when the retired employee 40 20 attains the age of 65, or when the employee chooses not to 21 receive the retirement benefits for which the employee has 22 applied, or when the employee is eligible for employer-paid 23 health insurance from a new employer. Coverages must be 24 coordinated with relevant health insurance benefits provided 25 through the federally sponsored Medicare program. Nothing in 26 this section obligates, limits, or otherwise affects the right 27 of the University of Minnesota to provide employer-paid 28 hospital, medical, dental benefits, and life insurance to any 29 person. 30 Subd. 4. (RULE OF 90.1 An employee who retires under this 31 section using the rule of 90 must not be included in the 32 calculations required b Minnesota Statutes, section 356.85. 33 Subd. 5. [APPLICATION OF OTHER LAWS.] Unilateral 34 implementation of this section by a public employer is not an 35 unfair labor practice for purposes of Minnesota Statutes, 36 cha ter 179A. The authority provided in this section for an 123 CHAPTER No. 513 H.F. No. 2694 1 employer to a health insurance costs for certain retired 2 employees is not subject to the limits in Minnesota Statutes, 3 section 179A.20, subdivision 2a. 4 Sec. 60. [REPEALER.] 5 Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 41A.051, is re led. 6 Minnesota Statutes 1990, section 270.185, is repealed effective 7 January 1, 1993. On that date, an balance in the reassessment 8 account of the s ecial revenue fund is transferred to the 9 general fund. The repeal of Minnesota Statutes 1991 Supplement,. 10 section 326.991, provided for in Laws 1991, chapter 306, section 11 26, is postponed until July 31, 1994. • 12 Sec. 61. [LAYOFFS.] 13 It is the olic of the le islature to maximize the 14 delivery of services to the public If layoffs of state 15 employees as defined in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 43A, are 16 necessary in an agency with 50 or more employees, the agency 17 shall make an effort to reduce at least the same percentage of 18 management and supervisory, personnel as line and support_ 19 per s` o_ nne1 for the biennium ending J ni 30, 1993- This section 20 does not modify any employee rights contained in any other law 21 or collective bargaining agreement under Minnesota Statutes, 22 chapter 179A. 23 Sec. 62. [LEGISLATIVE INTENT.] 24 The amendments in this article to Minnesota Statutes, 25 sections 3.736, 16B.85, and 466.06, are intended to clarify, 26 rather than to change,- the original intent of the statutes 27 amended 28 Sec. 63. (EFFECTIVE DATE.) effective the day following final l': -.'._.-------- - -.. 46, and 47, are 30 enactment, except that sections 36, 37, 42, 43, 31 effective July 1, 1992. 32 Sections 26, 32, and 44 apply to cases pending or brought 33 on or after their effective date. 34 ARTICLE 5 35 HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 36 Section 1. [HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; APPROPRIATIONS.] • 124 6c-7 & lb CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 174 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Request by Church of the Assumption for an on-sale non- intoxicating malt liquor license, itinerant place of amusement license and an itinerant food license for the 1992 Fun Fest to be held August 15 and 16, 1992. Background: on July 6,•1992, Church of the Assumption submitted a request for a temporary license to serve non-intoxicating malt liquor (3.2 beer), an itinerant place of amusement and an itinerant food license for August 15 and 16, 1992. They are requesting that any fee be waived. Recommended Motion: Approve the licenses fee waived for August 15 and 16, 1992 for Assumption's 1992 Fun Fest. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with the City codes pertaining to these licenses. 2. The applicant has supplied liquor liability insurance coverage. 3. The City has previously issued these licenses in conjunction with the Assumption Fun Fest. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny the request. The Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. In addition, the Council has previously granted these licenses in conjunction with the Assumption Fun Fest. Discussion/Decision Mode: The request for these license has been placed on the consent calendar for July 27, 1992. Res t ully submitted, Ja D. Prosser Ci y Manager JDP:ds 6E CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.175 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Setting date of public hearing for consideration of the issuance of a new on-sale liquor license for Paisan Incorporated d/b/a Khan's Mongolian Barbeque, 500 East 78th Street. Background: An application for a new on-sale liquor license for Paisan Incorporated d/b/a Khan's Mongolian Barbecue has been received by the City. City ordinance provides that the City-Council conduct a public hearing to consider all liquor license applications. Recommended Motion: Schedule August 10, 1992 as the date to hold the public hearing on the new application for liquor license for Khan's Mongolian Barbecue of Richfield. Basis for Recommendation: 1. A public hearing must be scheduled and held before a new license may be considered. 2. The new process has been initiated. . 3. Holding the public hearing on August 10, 1992 will provide ample time to complete the licensing process. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Schedule the hearing for another date. However, this may delay the licensing process. Discussion/Decision Mode: Action to schedule the public hearing on August 27, 1992 will provide sufficient time for legal publication of the hearing. Respe t ly submitted, Jame Prosser City nager JDP/ds 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.176 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Award of contract for the 1992 sealcoating project. Background: In 1979, the City of Richfield began a roadway improvement by sealcoating all bituminous streets. A thin coat of emi applied, then covered with rock. This the surface of the street and prevents phased project of of the City's zlsified oil is process rejuvenates it from deteriorating. Allied Blacktop was the successful bidder for the 1987 project with a bid price of $65,263.70. Bituminous Roadways was the successful bidder for the 1988 project with a bid price of $69,590.72, and again was the contractor for the 1989 project with a low bid of $118,742.40. Allied Blacktop was again the successful bidder for the 1990 project with a low bid of $98,467.64; and Bituminous Roadways was the successful bidder in 1991 with a low bid of $36,980.40. A bid opening was held July 17, 1992 with the following results: • Allied Blacktop, Inc. $54,174.40 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. 56,148.50 AsTech Corporation 63,182.99 The area to be sealcoated is between Portland and 12th Avenues/68th to 76th Streets. Recommended Motion: Approve the bid minutes/tabulation and award a contract to Allied Blacktop, Inc. in the sum of $54,174.40. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Allied Blacktop., Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. 2. The 1992 Street Division operating budget contains $57,844 for the contractor's services on this project.. Some of these funds will be used to perform cracksealing on the project. Contractor's bid on estimated quantities and costs will be monitored. Alternative Recommendation: Council may choose to reject all bids and direct staff to obtain new bids. However, the prices received for this work are extremely good, and staff does not believe we will . receive any lower bids. 6F- I • Discussion/Decision Mode: Staff would like to schedule this work as soon as possible, to be completed by September 1, 1992. Council approval at this time will facilitate completion by the specified deadline. Respectf ly submitted, James Prosser City anager JDP:ds Attachment U 0 6P- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA . Bid Opening July 17, 1992 11:00 A.M. 1992 Bituminous Sealcoating Construction Bid No. 92-8 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for 1992 bituminous sealcoating construction, bid no. 92-8, as advertised in the official newspaper on July 1, 1992. Present: Thomas,Ferber, City Clerk Donald Fondrick, Community Services Director Doris Swanson, City Manager Representative George Atkinson, Engineering Supervisor Roxi Braa, Administrative Aide. The following bids were submitted and read aloud: • i VENDOR i ; BID i ; TOTAL i ; SECURITY Allied Blacktop Inc. Maple Grove; 5% Bid Bond ; $54,174.40 ; Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Mpls; 5% Bid Bond ; $56,148.50 ; AsTech Corp. St. Cloud; 5% Bid Bond ; $63,182.99 ; The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the July 27, 1992 City Council Meeting. Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk 0 ? C-5-- • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 177 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Award of contract for pavement rehabilitation - Lyndale Avenue and 76th Street. Background: Although most of Richfield's streets were constructed to their present configuration between 1972 and 1975, and are still in good serviceable condition, some City streets are older and are now requiring major maintenance. Two streets that are in need of major rehabilitation are Lyndale Avenue between 64th Street and Lakeshore Drive, and 76th Street from the I35W bridge to approximately Knox Avenue. A formal bid opening was held on Wednesday, July 15, 1992 with the following results: Midwest Asphalt Corporation $147,609.90 C. S. McCrossan Construction 156,478.46 Alber Construction, Inc. 157,883.10 Hardrives, Inc. 165,621.40 McNamara Contracting Company, Inc. 173,675.70 Valley Paving, Inc. 179,654.90 Recommended Motion: Award a contract in the amount of $147,609.90 to Midwest Asphalt Corporation. Basis for Recommendation: 1. Midwest Asphalt Corporation submitted the low bid, and they are a reputable contractor. 2. The project is 100% Municipal State Aid reimbursable. Alternative Recommendation: Council could reject the bids and instruct staff to re-bid the project. However, the low bid is considerably less than the engineer's estimate of $183,000. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is scheduled for the July 27, 1992 Council meeting. Staff is requesting approval at this time in order to facilitate timely construction of this project. lXy submitted, 0 JDP:rb James III/ Prosser City ager CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA. 66-d Bid Opening July 15, 1992 • 11:00 A.M. Pavement Rehabilitation of Lyndale Avenue and 76th Street Bid No. 92-6 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for pavement rehabilitation of Lyndale Avenue and 76th Street, bid no. 92-6, as advertised in the official newspaper on June 24, 1992. Present: Thomas Ferber, City Clerk Donald Fondrick, Community Services Director Cheryl Krumholz, City Manager Representative Roxi Braa, Administrative Aide The following bids were submitted and read aloud: VENDOR BID ; TOTAL SECURITY Alber Construction, Inc. ; 5% Bid Bond ; $157,883.10 ; ; Rogers, MN • C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.; 5% Bid Bond ; $156,478.46 ; Maple Grove, MN Valley Paving, Inc. ; 5% Bid Bond ; $179,654.90 ; Shakopee, MN McNamra Contracting Co., Inc. ; 5$ Bid Bond ; $173,675.70 ; Aple Valley, MN Harddrives, Inc. ; 5% Bid Bond ; $165,621.40 ; St. Cloud, MN Midwest Asphalt Corp. ; 5$ Bid Bond ; $147,609:90 ; Hopkins, MN The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the July 27, 1992 City Council Meeting. is Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk ?N • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 178 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a commercial kennel license for Woodlake Veterinary Hospital, 6436 Lyndale Avenue. Background: On June 30, 1992 Woodlake Veterinary Hospital submitted an application for the renewal.of their commercial kennel license. On July 6, 1992, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a commercial kennel license be approved.. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with the City codes pertaining to a commercial kennel license. 2. The City has previously issued a kennel license to Woodlake Veterinary Hospital. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny the request for a.commercial kennel license. However, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a commercial kennel license for Woodlake Veterinary Hospital, 6436 Lyndale Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. ly submitted, James Dr./ Prosser City a alter JDP:ds 7 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 179 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Continuation of a public hearing regarding the renewal of a residential kennel license for Sharon Trego, 6732 11th Avenue. Background: On May 14, 1992, Sharon Trego submitted an application for a residential kennel license. She owns four dogs (a Sheep Dog, American Eskimo, Shelty and Welch Corgie). Ms. Trego's application had all contiguous property owner's signatures on it with the exception of the resident living next door at 6738 11th Avenue. On May 15, 1992, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. The Community Service Officer did note that one of the abutting property owners had not signed the petition. Staff has met with the neighbor who does not want to sign the petition. That resident has concerns about barking dogs in general, not necessarily specific to the Trego residence, although that is part of the problem. They have been referred to • West Suburban Mediation Center as it appears this is a long standing dispute between two neighbors. West Suburban Mediation Center notified the City on July 16, 1992, that the Tregos were willing to mediate. Several attempts were made to contact Mr. Pertler. Mr. Pertler has not responded to any of West Suburban's attempts at mediation. Although this application is for four dogs, it does not exceed the maximum number of six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a residential kennel license be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two dogs does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Ms. Trego has not been able to satisfy this, but was willing to try to work things out by agreeing to participate in mediation. 2. Staff has been contacted by one neighbor with concerns regarding the barking dogs, even though these concerns are not entirely to the Tregos. 7-1 Alternative Recommendation: • 1. The Council could decide to deny Ms. Trego's residential kennel license. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a residential kennel license for Sharon Trego, 6732 11th Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respect ly submitted, 4 JDP:ds 41 Jame . Prosser City anager 40 • 6721 10th None 6720 None 11th 6721 Prust 11th 1 Dog 6727 Harrisson 6726 6727 Fritz 10th 2 Dogs 11th None 11th 1 Dog Q) Z > ,Q Q 6733 Lyddon 6732 Trego 10th 2 Dogs 11th 3 Dogs 6733 None 11th 0 X C 0 6739 Knutson 6738 Pertler 6739 10th 2 Dogs 11th None None 11th 6745 10th None 6744 Larson 6745 Forester 11 th 1 Dog 11th 1 Dog East 68th Street 0 WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER /7,3 1011 First Street South, Suite 200, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933-0005 TO: Jack Erskine Public Safety Director, Richfield Police DATE: July 16, 1992 RE: Mediation Hearing Case *92141 (Pertler/Trego ) Thank you for your referral to the West Suburban Mediation Center regarding a neighborhood dispute between Mike and Sharon Trego and Eugene Pertler. In the process of setting up the mediation, we only received a response from Mike and Sharon Trego who were quite willing to mediate. On June 17, 1992, we were finally able to get ahold of Eugene Pertler. At this time he stated he had been in exams and his mind wasn't in a state to deal with the situation. He also felt he was too busy and it was too late to mediate. On July 03, 1992, we called Eugene Pertler again to see if he would go through with the mediation process. I spoke with his mother, Emma Pertler, and she was not sure if he would, but said he would call us back with his decision. He never returned our call. On July 10, 1992, I sent out a letter requesting that Mr. Pertler call our office by july 15, 1992 or this case would be referred back to the City of Richfield.. Unfortunately, we did not hear from Eugene Pertler and therefore are referring this case back to your office. We are sorry we could not set up a mediation so that the parties could experience the positive results of the process. Again, thank you for your referral. If you have any questions, please call our office. Thank you, Anne Clarke Case veloper 0 S • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 180 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Public hearing to adopt the special assessment roll for City Project No. 864, 1991 Alley Maintenance for the Period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Background: The City Council has scheduled a public hearing to be held Monday, July 27, 1992 on the assessment for the cost of current maintenance services on alleys for the period January 1 through December 31, 1991. City staff has calculated the proper amounts to be assessed against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land specially benefited. The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk, notice was duly published and.notices were mailed to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. The cost of current maintenance services January l through December 31, 1991 totaled $21,426.94 and included labor, material and equipment related to alley patching, snowplowing and joint cleaning. Due to the length of the list, the assessment roll is • not included in the Council packet, but a copy of the assessment roll for alley maintenance January 1 - December 31, 1991 will be available for Council reference and review at the. July 27, 1992 City Council public hearing. The cost of maintenance services in 1990 totaled $17,213.95. The estimated cost of maintenance services for 1992 is $20,000. City staff will be available at the hearing to answer questions about the special assessment that may not have been raised prior to the hearing. The public hearing provides an opportunity for all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment. The City ordinance provides that special assessments for current services may be certified to the County Auditor for collection along with current taxes. It is recommended that the certification adopted by the City Council provide that payments be due and payable within the first year, rather than in installments. The City has the right to charge interest on the amount assessed in that the City provided the funds initially for the current services. It is the staff recommendation that the interest rate be established at eight percent, the maximum permitted by law. A property owner may make payment before November 15, 1992 in order to avoid interest payments. Payments • made after that date, up to December 31,.1992, would include the interest charges. gI Recommended Motion: Following the public hearing, adopt the attached resolution, adopting the assessment roll of City Project No. 864, Alley Maintenance for the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Notice of the assessment has been published in the official City newspaper as required by State Statute. . 2. Each affected property owner has been notified as required by law. Alternative Recommendation: None. • Discussion/Decision Mode: The City Council may make changes as deemed necessary in the assessment roll as a result of the public hearing by adding the phrase "and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just." The assessment roll must be submitted to Hennepin County by October 10, 1992 so the Council can defer the decision one meeting if it deems necessary. JDP:ds Attachment Respectf y submitted, James D. Prosser City an ger 0 Z-)' RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON CITY PROJECT NO. 864 ALLEY MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 1991 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current services related to maintenance of the following alleys in the City of Richfield: Number Surrounding Avenues Surroundin g Streets 1001 Xerxes - Washburn 66th - 67th 1002 Xerxes - Washburn 67th - 68th 1003 Xerxes - Washburn 68th - 69th 1004 Xerxes - Washburn 69th - 70th 1005 Washburn - Vincent 66th - 67th 1006 Washburn - Vincent 67th - 68th 1007 Washburn - Vincent 68th - 69th 1008 Washburn - Vincent 69th - 70th 1009 Vincent - Upton 66th - 67th 1010 Vincent - Upton 67th - 68th 1011 Vincent - Upton 68th - 69th 1012 Vincent - Upton 69th - 70th 1013 Upton - Thomas 66th - 67th 1014 Upton - Thomas 68th - 69th 1015 Upton - Thomas 69th - 70th • 1016 Thomas - Sheridan 66th - 67th 1017 Thomas - Sheridan 67th - 68th 1018 Thomas - Sheridan 68th - 69th 1019 Thomas - Sheridan 69th - 70th 1020 Sheridan - Russell 66th - 67th 1021 Sheridan - Russell 67th - 68th 1022 Sheridan - Russell 68th - 69th 1023 Sheridan - Russell 69th - 70th 1024 Russell - Queen 66th - -67th 1025 Russell - Queen 67th - 68th 1026 Russell - Queen 68th - 69th 1027 Russell - Queen 69th - 70th 1028 Queen - Penn 66th - 67th 1029 Queen - Penn 67th - 68th 1030 Queen - Penn 68th - 69th 1031 Queen - Penn 69th - 70th 2001 Penn - Oliver 63rd - 64th 2002 Oliver - Newton 63rd - 64th 2004 Morgan - Logan 63rd - 64th 2005 Logan - Knox 63rd - 64th 2007 James - Irving 63rd - 64th 2008 Irving - Humboldt 63rd - 64th 2009 Humboldt - Girard 63rd - 64th 2010 Girard - Fremont (35W) 63rd - 64th 2011 Girard - Fremont (35W) 64th - 65th 2012 Girard - Fremont (35W) 65th - 66th 2013 Fremont (35W.) - Emerson 64th - 65th 5,3 2014 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 65th - 66th • 2015 Dupont - Colfax 63rd - Mildred 2016 Colfax - Bryant 63rd - Mildred 2017 Bryant - Aldrich 63rd - Mildred 2019 Graham - Lyndale 66th - Lk Shr Dr 2020 Aldrich - Lyndale 75th - 76th 2021 Aldrich - Lyndale 76th - 77th 3002 Lyndale - Garfield 68th - 69th 3003 Augsburg - Garfield 70th - 71st 3004 Augsburg - Garfield 71st - 72nd 3005 Lyndale - Garfield 72nd - 73rd 3006 Lyndale - Garfield 73rd - 74th 3007 Garfield - Harriet 71st - 72nd 3008 Garfield - Harriet 72nd - 73rd 3009 Garfield - Harriet 73rd - 74th 3011 Harriet - Grand 67th - 68th 3012 Harriet - Grand 68th - 69th 3013 Harriet - Grand 72nd - 73rd 3014 Harriet - Grand 73rd - 74th 3015 Grand - Pleasant 68th - 69th 3016 Grand - Pleasant 72nd - 73rd 3018 Wentworth - Blaisdell 67th - 68th 3020 Blaisdell - Nicollet 72nd - 73rd 3021 Blaisdell - Nicollet 73rd - 74th 3022 Blaisdell - Nicollet 74th - 75th 3023 Blaisdell - Nicollet 75th - 76th 3024 Nicollet - 2nd Avenue 68th - 69th • 3025 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 70th - 71st 3026 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 71st - 72nd 3027 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3028 1st - Stevens 71st - 72nd 3029 1st - Stevens 72nd - 73rd 3030 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3031 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3032 2nd - 3rd Avenue 66th - 67th 3033 2nd - 3rd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3034 2nd - 3rd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3035 3rd - Clinton 66th - 67th 3036 3rd - Clinton 73rd - 74th 3037 Clinton - 4th Avenue 66th - 67th 3038 Clinton - 4th Avenue 73rd - 74th 3039 4th - 5th Avenue 66th - 67th 3040 4th - 5th Avenue 73rd - 74th 4001 13th - 14th Avenue 65th - 66th 4002 14th - 15th Avenue 62nd - 63rd 4004 15th - Bloomington 62nd - 63rd 4005 15th - Bloomington 65th - 66th 4006 Bloomington - 16th Avenue 65th - 66th 4007 Cedar - Longfellow 63rd - 64th 4008 Cedar - Longfellow 64th - 65th 4009 Cedar - Longfellow 65th - 66th 4012 22nd - Standish 65th - 66th . 4013 13th - 14th Avenue 66th - 67th .5-4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the • City of Richfield, Minnesota: 1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the total amount of $21,426.94 is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current services in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable before or during 1992 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole or part of the assessment on such property to the City's Assessing Division, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City's Assessing Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. • 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk 40 I? • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 181 Agenda July 27, 1992. Issue Statement: Public hearing to adopt the special assessment roll for City Project No. 862, LHN Maintenance for the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Background:. The City Council has scheduled a public hearing to be held Monday, July 27, 1992 on the assessment for the cost of current maintenance services performed in the LHN Redevelopment Area for the period January 1 through December 31, 1991. City staff has calculated the proper amounts to be assessed against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land specially benefited. The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk, notice was duly published, and notices were mailed.to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. The cost of current maintenance services for this period totaled $43,825.22. The 1990 total for this work was $43,539.10. Estimated 1992 costs for the current maintenance services is $46,484.00. • The current maintenance services for this period included, but were not necessarily limited to, one or more of the following, including labor, equipment and materials: 1. Landscaping, including tree trimming; 2. Sidewalk sweeping in the summer; 3. Snow removal in the winter; 4. Sidewalk deicing; 5. Painting and repair of wood furniture; 6. Trash removal; 7. General maintenance, including repairs and replacement; 8. Irrigation maintenance. The City ordinance provides that special assessments for current services may be certified to the County Auditor for collection along with taxes. It is the staff recommendation that such payments be due and payable within the first year, rather than in installments. The adopted assessment roll for the period of January 1 through December 31, 1991 would be certified with the County Auditor by October 10, 1992. The City has the right to charge interest on the amount assessed in that the City provided the funds initially for the current services. It is the recommendation of the City staff that the interest rate be established at eight percent. Payment may be made by the assessed owner before November 15, 1992, in order to avoid . interest payments. Payments made after that date would include the interest payment. q-1 Recommended Motion: • Following the public hearing, approve the attached resolution adopting the assessment on City Project No. 862, LHN Maintenance for the period January 1 through December 31, 1991. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Notice of the assessment has been published in the official City newspaper as required by State Statute. 2. Each affected property owner has been notified as required by law. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: The City Council may make changes as deemed necessary in the assessment roll as a result of the public hearing by adding the phrase "and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just." The assessment roll must be submitted to Hennepin County by October 10, 1992 so the Council can defer the decision one meeting if it deems necessary. Respect^lly submitted, 0 JDP:ds Attachment Jame Prosser City nager 0 q")-- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON CITY PROJECT NO. 862 LHN MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 1991 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current services related to maintenance of the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area, which is approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue in the City of Richfield. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the total amount of $43,825.22, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current services in the amount of assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable before or during 1992 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the City's Assessing Division and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City's Assessing Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment.roll to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk /0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • Council Letter No. 182 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Public hearing to adopt the special assessment roll for City Project No. 863, ILN (Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet) Maintenance for the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Background: The City Council has scheduled a public hearing to be held Monday, July 27, 1992 on the assessment for the cost of current maintenance services performed in the ILN Redevelopment Area for the period January 1 through. December 31, 1991. City staff has calculated the proper amounts to be assessed against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land specially benefited. The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk, notice was duly published, and notices were mailed to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. The cost of current maintenance services for this period totaled $8,555.46. The 1990 total for this work was $7,762.52. Estimated 1992 costs for the current maintenance services is $8,894. The current maintenance services for this period included, but were not necessarily limited to, one or more of the following, including labor, equipment and materials: 1. Landscape maintenance of common properties, including mowing, fertilizing, edging; 2. Irrigation maintenance; 3. Trash removal and general maintenance. The City ordinance provides that special assessments for current services may be certified to the County Auditor for collection along with taxes. It is the staff recommendation that such payments be due and payable within the first year, rather than in installments. The adopted assessment roll for the period of January 1 through December 31, 1991 would be certified with the County Auditor by October 10, 1992. The City has the right to charge interest on the amount assessed in that the City provided the funds initially for the current services. It is the recommendation of City staff that the interest rate be established at eight percent. Payment may be made by the assessed owner before November 15, 1992, in order to avoid interest payments. Payments made after that date would include the interest payment. Recommended Motion: Following the public hearing, approve the attached resolution adopting the assessment on City Project No. 863, ILN Maintenance for the period January 1 through December 31, 1991. Basis of Recommendation: • 1. Notice of the assessment has been published in the official City newspaper as required by State Statute. 2. Each affected property owner has been notified as required by law. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: The City Council may make changes as deemed necessary in the assessment roll as a result of the public hearing by adding the phrase "and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just." The assessment roll must be submitted to Hennepin County by October 10, 1992 so the Council can defer the decision one meeting if it deems necessary. JDP:ds • Attachment Resp u ly submitted, Jam s Prosser Cit anager /b-2- RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON CITY PROJECT NO. 863 ILN MAINTENANCE FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 1991 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current services related to maintenance of the Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment Area, which is approximately bounded by Lyndale Avenue, 78th Street, the railroad tracks and 77th Street including that property known as Hennepin County Property Identification No. 34-028-24-33-0073 in the City of Richfield. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. Such proposed assessment roll in the total amount of $8,555.46, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current services in the amount of assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable before or during 1992 and shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent from the • date of adoption of this assessment resolution. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the City's Assessing Division and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City's Assessing Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the County Cuditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 183 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Public Hearing on adoption of the assessment roll for removal of diseased trees from private property for the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Background: The City Council has scheduled a hearing to be held on July 27, 1992, for the assessment of the cost for removal of diseased trees from private property during the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. City staff has calculated the proper amounts to be assessed against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land specially benefited. The proposed assessment was properly filed with the City Clerk, notice was duly published and notices were mailed to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. The cost of diseased tree removal from private property for this period totaled $34,116.57. City ordinance provides that special assessments for current services may be certified to the County Auditor for collection along with taxes. This certification may provide that the assessment be completely paid in the first year or in annual installments. It is the staff recommendation that such payments be due and payable over a three year period. • The adopted assessment roll for the period January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991 would be certified with the County Auditor by October 10, 1992. The City has the right to charge interest on the amount assessed in that the City provided the funds for the initial expense. It is the staff recommendation that the interest rate be established at eight percent, the maximum allowed by State law. Payment may be made by the assessed owner before November 15, 1992 in order to avoid interest payments. Payments made after that date would include the interest payment. City staff will be available at the hearing to answer questions about the special assessment that may not have been raised prior to the hearing. The public hearing provides an opportunity for all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment. Recommendation: Following the public hearing, approve the attached resolution adopting the assessment for removal of diseased trees from private property for the period of January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991, with such payments due and payable over a three-year period. Basis of Recommendation: is 1. Each affected property owner has been notified of the proposed assessment as required by law. 2. Notice of the assessment has been published in the official • City newspaper as required by State Statute. Alternate Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: Council may make any changes deemed necessary in the assessment roll as a result of the hearing by adding the phrase, "and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just." y submitted, RespWMaager Jame osser City JDP:ds Attachment • 0 11 -a -- RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ON REMOVAL OF DISEASED TREES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 1991 TO DECEMBER 31, 1991 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and passes upon all objections to the proposed assessment for current services related to removal of diseased trees from the following private property in the City of Richfield: Property Address 7123 Oak Grove Boulevard 7110 Knox Avenue 6928 Upton Avenue 6501 Oliver Avenue 121 East 68th Street 6845 Garfield Avenue 500 East 67th Street 6433 Bloomington Avenue 6326 Girard Avenue 6501 Girard Avenue 6533 Emerson Avenue 6801 Vincent Avenue 6629 Lynwood Boulevard • 6525-20th Avenue 7357 Portland Avenue 6236 Bloomington Avenue 7201 Penn Avenue 6708 Russell Avenue 1511 East 62nd Street 7125 Oak Grove Boulevard 6932-16th Avenue 7015 Oliver Avenue 7309 Garfield Avenue 6824 Park Avenue 6824 James Avenue 6316-21st Avenue 7012 Portland Avenue 7208 Knox Avenue 7300 Penn Avenue 6214-14th Avenue 7301 Logan Avenue 6344-21st Avenue 7321 Emerson Avenue 7340 Dupont Avenue 7314 Sheridan Avenue 2208 East 66th Street 6308 Aldrich Avenue 6441 Girard Avenue 6609 Girard Avenue . 7508 Girard Avenue 6525 Oliver Avenue 2204 East 66th Street Property Identification Number 33-02824-14-0092 33-02824-21-0057 29-02824-43-0149 28-02824-23-0098 27-02824-43-0105 27-02824-33-0102 27-02824-41-0013 26-02824-14-0089 28-02824-12-0034 28-02824-13-0029 28-02824-13-0066 29-02824-43-0048 28-02824-41-0031 25-02824-23-0050 35-02824-23-0007 26-02824-12-0049 33-02824-23-0006 29-02824-41-0096 26-02824-12-0040 33-02824-14-0091 26-02824-44-0118 33-02824-22-0050 34-02824-23-0127 26-02824-33-0094 28-02824-34-0030 25-02824-22-0058 34-02824-11-0072 33-02824-24-0013 32-02824-14-0070 26-02824-12-0122 33-02824-24-0046 25-02824-22-0051 33-02824-13-0093 33-02824-13-0085 32-02824-14-0112 25-02824-24-0025 28-02824-11-0043 28-02824-13-0010 28-02824-42-0029 33-02824-42-0068 28-02824-23-0093 25-02824-24-0024 U-3 6835 Longfellow Avenue 6812 Emerson Lane • 7033 Fourth Avenue 6644 Clinton Avenue 6309-20th Avenue 6901 First Avenue 6439-13th Avenue 6616 Second Avenue 6615 Lynwood Boulevard 157 East 68th Street 6830 Columbus Avenue 25-02824-33-0048 28-02824-42-0090 34-02824-11-0099 27-02824-41-0078 25-02824-22-0041 27-02824-43-0066 26-02824-13-0125 27-02824-42-0064 28-02824-41-0027 27-02824-43-0101 26-02824-33-0092 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Such proposed assessment roll, in the amount of $34,116.57, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed current services in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in no more than three annual installments and shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time • prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the City's Assessing Division, and he may at any time thereafter, pay to the City's Assessing Division the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The City.Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment roll to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: is Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk /c';1- CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • Council Letter No. 184 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Public hearing to consider specially assessing current maintenance services for City alleys for the period of January 1 through December 31, 1993, City Project No. 883. Background: On June 8,.1992, the City Council scheduled a public hearing for July 27, 1992 concerning the 1993 alley maintenance project. In order to implement the alley maintenance policies previously passed by the City Council, it is necessary for the Council to initiate this specific alley maintenance project. The maintenance functions to be financed through special assessments include such work as rough grading, cleaning and sweeping, cold patching and snow plowing. Because the vast majority of alleys have now been paved, the primary maintenance function is anticipated to be snow plowing. Some of the alleys resurfaced in the early 1980's have also reached the time when concrete joint sealing needs to be done. Community Services Department personnel estimate the cost of this project for the period January 1 through December 31, 1993 to be $20,000. The amount of special assessment could vary according to the amount of work necessary on each individual alley. The costs for the repair of an alley will be charged to the property owners abutting the alley. $7.50 per average fifty foot lot is the estimate for sweeping and a normal winter of snow plowing. $3.25 per average fifty foot lot is an estimate of the costs to continue a concrete joint sealing maintenance program on a paved alley as a part of routine maintenance. Estimates of additional costs on those alleys not of concrete has been about $23 per average fifty foot lot. Costs have varied depending on the amount of patching required in a particular alley. For comparison purposes, the following is provided related to alley maintenance special assessment for current services: 1985 Actual $15,141.97 1986 Estimated $23,600.00 1986 Actual $11,834.29 1987 Estimated $ 7,000.00 1987 Actual $ 9,977.18 1988 Estimated $17,000.00 1988 Actual $ 8,453.93 1989 Estimated $20,000.00 1989 Actual $17,725.98 1990 Estimated $20,000.00 1990 Actual $17,213.95 • 1991 .Estimated $20,000.00 1991 Actual $21,426.94 1992 Estimated $20,000.00 • Recommended Motion: Following the close of the public hearing, adopt the attached resolution ordering City Project No. 883, 1993 Alley Maintenance project and special assessment of current services. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Notice of the proposed assessment was published in the official City newspaper. • 2. Each property owner within the area proposed to be assessed was mailed a notice as required by State law. 3. It has been the Council policy for 11 years to assess for alley maintenance. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: The current alley maintenance project will lapse at the end of the year. A new project should be established by January 1, 1993 so the Council may defer the decision to a future meeting before the end of the year if desired. Res u ly submitted, Jame . Prosser City Ma alter JDP:ds Attachment 0 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING THE UNDERTAKING OF CURRENT SERVICES PROJECT FOR ALLEY MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1, 1993 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1993 CITY PROJECT NO. 883 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 8th day of June, 1992, fixed a date for a public hearing on the proposed maintenance of the following alleys: Number Surrounding Avenues Surrounding Streets 1001 Xerxes - Washburn 66th - 67th 1002 Xerxes - Washburn 67th - 68th 1003 Xerxes - Washburn 68th - 69th 1004 Xerxes - Washburn 69th - 70th 1005 Washburn - Vincent 66th - 67th 1006 Washburn - Vincent 67th - 68th 1007 Washburn - Vincent 68th - 69th 1008 Washburn - Vincent 69th - 70th 1009 Vincent - Upton 66th - 67th 1010 Vincent - Upton 67th - 68th 1011 Vincent - Upton 68th - 69th 1012 Vincent - Upton 69th - 70th 1013 Upton - Thomas 66th - 67th 1014 Upton - Thomas 68th - 69th • 1015 Upton - Thomas 69th - 70th 1016 Thomas - Sheridan 66th - 67th 1017 Thomas - Sheridan 67th - 68th 1018 Thomas - Sheridan 68th - 69th 1019 Thomas - Sheridan 69th -70th 1020 Sheridan - Russell 66th - 67th 1021 Sheridan - Russell 67th - 68th 1022 Sheridan - Russell 68th - 69th 1023 Sheridan - Russell 69th - 70th 1024 Russell - Queen 66th - 67th 1025 Russell - Queen 67th - 68th 1026 Russell - Queen 68th - 69th 1027 Russell - Queen 69th - 70th 1028 Queen - Penn 66th - 67th 1029 Queen - Penn 67th - 68th 1030 Queen - Penn 68th - 69th 1031 Queen - Penn 69th - 70th 2001 Penn - Oliver 63rd - 64th 2002 Oliver - Newton 63rd - 64th 2004 Morgan - Logan 63rd - 64th 2005 Logan - Knox 63rd - 64th 2007 James - Irving 63rd - 64th 2008 Irving - Humboldt 63rd - 64th 2009 Humboldt - Girard 63rd - 64th 2010 Girard - Fremont (35W) 63rd - 64th • 2011 Girard - Fremont (35W) 64th - 65th 2012 Girard - Fremont (35W) 65th- 66th f C?_-3 2013 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 64th - 65th • 2014 Fremont (35W) - Emerson 65th - 66th 2015 Dupont - Colfax 63rd - Mildred 2016 Colfax - Bryant 63rd - Mildred 2017 Bryant - Aldrich 63rd - Mildred 2019 Graham - Lyndale 66th - Lk Shr Dr 2020 Aldrich - Lyndale 75th - 76th 2021 Aldrich - Lyndale 76th - 77th 3002 Lyndale - Garfield 68th - 69th 3003 Augsburg - Garfield 70th - 71st 3004 Augsburg - Garfield 71st - 72nd 3005 Lyndale - Garfield 72nd - 73rd 3006 Lyndale - Garfield 73rd - 74th 3007 Garfield - Harriet 71st - 72nd 3008 Garfield - Harriet 72nd - 73rd 3009 Garfield - Harriet 73rd - 74th 3011 Harriet - Grand 67th - 68th 3012 Harriet - Grand 68th - 69th 3013 Harriet - Grand 72nd - 73rd 3014 Harriet - Grand 73rd - 74th 3015 Grand - Pleasant 68th - 69th 3016 Grand - Pleasant 72nd - 73rd 3018 Wentworth - Blaisdell 67th - 68th 3020 Blaisdell - Nicollet 72nd - 73rd 3021 Blaisdell - Nicollet 73rd - 74th 3022 Blaisdell - Nicollet 74th - 75th 3023 Blaisdell.- Nicollet 75th - 76th 3024 Nicollet - 2nd Avenue 68th - 69th 3025 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 70th - 71st 3026 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 71st - 72nd 3027 Nicollet - 1st Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3028 1st - Stevens 71st - 72nd 3029 1st - Stevens 72nd - 73rd 3030 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3031 Stevens - 2nd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3032 2nd - 3rd Avenue 66th - 67th 3033 2nd - 3rd Avenue 71st - 72nd 3034 2nd - 3rd Avenue 72nd - 73rd 3035 3rd - Clinton 66th - 67th 3036 3rd - Clinton 73rd - 74th 3037 Clinton - 4th Avenue 66th - 67th 3038 Clinton - 4th Avenue 73rd - 74th 3039 4th - 5th Avenue 66th - 67th 3040 4th - 5th Avenue 73rd - 74th 4001 13th - 14th Avenue 65th - 66th 4002 14th - 15th Avenue 62nd - 63rd 4004 15th - Bloomington 62nd - 63rd 4005 15th - Bloomington 65th - 66th 4006 Bloomington - 16th Avenue 65th - 66th 4007 Cedar - Longfellow 63rd - 64th 4008 Cedar - Longfellow 64th - 65th 4009 Cedar - Longfellow 65th - 66th 4012 22nd - Standish 65th - 66th 4013 13th - 14th Avenue 66th - 67th WHEREAS, the owner of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed for the current maintenance services described in said resolution was mailed a copy of the required notice; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and at least two weeks advance publication of the required notice was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was held on this 27th day of July, 1992, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Such alley maintenance is hereby ordered as proposed by resolution adopted June 8, 1992. 2. The work to be performed may be by day labor, by City force, by contract or by any combination thereof. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 27th day of July, 1992. is Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk 0 /3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA • Council Letter No. 185 Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Public hearing to consider specially assessing the Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (LHN) area for current maintenance services for the period of January 1 through December 31, 1993 - City Project No. 881. Background: The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for July 27, 1992 to consider the establishment of a special assessment district for current maintenance service costs in the LHN redevelopment area. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to all owners of commercial property in the area and published in the official newspaper as required by law. The higher level of maintenance proposed to be provided in the area includes the trimming and watering of trees and plants, operation of a special street lighting system, removal of snow and ice from sidewalks and performance of other specialized maintenance functions. The estimated maintenance cost for the period January 1 through December 31, 1993 is $45,050. All commercial properties would be • assessed on the basis of area, with each square foot of assessable property to be assessed equally, for the costs incurred in the maintenance of common areas such as street islands, the civic plaza and sidewalks. There is an agreement between the City and the businesses that the business shall maintain the property behind the curb. In the event the City must perform this maintenance, the particular business is assessed for the cost of the special, individual maintenance of direct benefit to the given property. For comparison purposes, the following is provided related to the LHN maintenance special assessments for current services: 1985 Actual $35,726.00 1986 Estimated $52,900.00 1986 Actual $40,110.00 1987 Estimated $49,936.00 1987 Actual $45,694.16 1988 Estimated $50,142.00 1988 Actual $44,405.24 1989 Estimated $40,614.00 1989 Actual $43,151.19 1990 Estimated $44,560.00 1990 Actual $43,539.10 1991 Estimated $44,153.00 1991 Actual $43,825.22 • 1992 Estimated $46,484.00 l3-l Recommended Motion: • Following the close of the public hearing, adopt the resolution ordering the LHN maintenance work for the period January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1993 (City Project No. 881) to be done and the costs to be specially assessed. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Notice of proposed assessment has been published in the official newspaper. 2. Each affected property owner has been notified of the proposed assessment. 3. Continued maintenance service for this commercial area is recommended in order to sustain the current standards for landscaping and maintenance which have been successful over the past years. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing has been scheduled for the July 27, 1992 City Council meeting. Respect ly submitted, • Jame Prosser City M alter JDP:ds Attachment L_J (?c;L RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING UNDERTAKING OF CURRENT SERVICE PROJECT LYNDALE/HUB/NICOLLET (LHN) MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1993 CITY PROJECT NO. 881 WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance, the City Council of the City of Richfield did establish a special assessment district and did propose that certain current services be undertaken by the City in the Lyndale/HUB/Nicollet (LHN) Redevelopment Area approximately bounded by 64th Street, First Avenue, 67th Street and Emerson Avenue and that the cost of such services be specially assessed against benefited property; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield did also by such resolution set the date of public hearing on the undertaking of such current service project and the levying of special assessment to bear the cost thereof; and WHEREAS, following due notice, such public hearing was held on July 27, 1992 at which time all interested parties desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: • 1. That the following examples of current services of the City shall be undertaken by the City within the LHN Redevelopment Project Area, which area constitutes the special assessment district with the exception of single family, two family and multifamily residential properties, with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against the benefited property within the district: a. Snow, ice or rubbish removal; b. Weed elimination; c. Elimination or removal of public health or safety hazards from private property, excluding and structure included under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 463.15 to 463.26; d. Installation and repair of,water service lines; e. Street sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets; f.. Trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees; g. Repair of sidewalks, crosswalks and other pedestrian walkways; h. Operation of the street lighting system; i. Maintenance of landscaped areas and other public amenities on or adjacent to street right-of-way; J. Maintenance of civic plaza; • k. Snow removal and other maintenance of streets; 1. Painting and repair of wood furniture; and M. General maintenance, including repairs and replacement. . 2. The work to be performed may be by day labor, by City force, by contract or by any combination thereof. 3. The designated period of the project shall be from January 1 through December 31, 1993. Costs of the project shall be-collected in the manner provided in the Richfield Ordinance Code. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk • L? 1C[ CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No.186 • Agenda July 27, 1992 Issue Statement: Public hearing to consider specially assessing the Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) area for current maintenance services for the period of January 1 through December 31, 1993 - City Project No. 874. Background: The City Council has scheduled a public hearing for July 27, 1992 to consider the establishment of a special assessment district for current maintenance service costs in the ILN redevelopment area, that area approximately bounded by Lyndale Avenue, the railroad tracks, 77th Street and 78th Street including that property known as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-24-33-0073. Notice of this public hearing was mailed to all owners of multiple residential and commercial property in the area and published in the official newspaper as required by law. The higher level of maintenance proposed to be provided in the area includes landscape maintenance of common properties through tree trimming, mowing, fertilizing and edging; irrigation maintenance; painting and repair of wood furniture; trash removal and general maintenance through repair and replacement of lights, sidewalks, curbs, furniture and plantings; and performance of • other specialized maintenance functions. These items are extra services provided directly to the ILN project area and do not include services provided to the entire City. The estimated maintenance cost for the period January 1 through December 31, 1993 is $9,200. All multiple residential and commercial properties would be assessed on the basis of area, with each square foot of assessable property to be assessed equally, for the costs incurred in the maintenance of common areas. For comparison purposes, the following is provided related to ILN maintenance special assessment for current services: 1988 Actual $7,001.47 1989 Estimated $7,254.00 1989 Actual $6,135.54 1990 Estimated $7,514.00 1990 Actual $7,762.52 1991 Estimated $7,780.00 1991 Actual $8,555.46 1992 Estimated $8,894.00 1993 Estimated $9,200.00 Recommended Motion: Following the close of public hearing, adopt the resolution ordering the ILN maintenance work for the period January 1 through December 31, 1993 (City Project No. 874) to be done and the costs to be specially assessed. • Basis of Recommendation: 1. Notice of proposed assessment has been published in the official newspaper. 2. Each affected property owner has been notified of the proposed assessment. 3. Continued maintenance service for this area is recommended in order to sustain the current standards for landscaping and maintenance which have been successful over the past years in another redevelopment area. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Council may choose to establish a set rate and limit the maintenance performed to that dollar amount. However, due to variables such as weather and accidents, staff believes the redevelopment area could suffer if maintenance were to be limited. 2. Council may choose to have individual property owners perform maintenance of the common areas. This may, however, involve the City to a great extent to work out the details of the .maintenance program. The special assessment as proposed does provide the coordination which may not be available through this possible alternative. • Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing has been scheduled for the July 27, 1992 City Council meeting. ly submitted, JameVi .I Prosser City a ager JDP:ds Attachment 14 -C?- .7 • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING THE UNDERTAKING OF CURRENT SERVICE PROJECT FOR INTERSTATE/LYNDALE/NICOLLET (ILN) MAINTENANCE JANUARY 1, 1993 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1993 CITY PROJECT NO. 874 WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance, the City Council of the City of Richfield did establish a special assessment district and did propose that certain current services be undertaken by the City in the Interstate/Lyndale/Nicollet (ILN) Redevelopment Area, the boundaries of which approximate Lyndale Avenue, 78th Street, the. railroad tracks and 77th Street including the property known as Hennepin County Property Identification Number 34-028-24-33-0073, and that the cost of such services be specially assessed against benefited property; and WHEREAS, the owner of each multiple residential and commercial property within the area proposed to be assessed for the service described in said resolution was mailed a copy of the required notice; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice of the hearing and one publication of the required notice was given at least two weeks in advance as required by law; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was held on July 27, 1992 at which time all interested parties desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the following examples of current services of the City shall be undertaken by the City within the ILN district, which area constitutes the special assessment district, with the cost of such services to be specially assessed against benefited multiple residential and commercial property within the district: Landscape maintenance of common properties; including, but not limited to, tree trimming, mowing, fertilizing, edging; Irrigation maintenance; Painting and repair of wood furniture; Trash removal and general maintenance; limited to, repairs and replacement curbs, furniture, plantings. including, but not of lights, sidewalks, 2. That the work to be performed.may be by day labor, by City force, by contract or by any combination thereof. 3. That the designated period of the project shall be from January 1 through December 31, 1993. Costs of the project shall be collected in the manner provided in the Richfield Ordinance Code. 10-5 • Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 27th day of July, 1992. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk