Loading...
03-20-2017 Work Session Complete AgendaSPECIAL CONCURRENT CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORKSESSION RICHFIELD MUNICIPAL CENTER, BARTHOLOMEW ROOM MARCH 20, 2017 6:00 PM Call to order Discussion regarding the formation of an Economic Development Authority (Council Memo No. 28/HRA Memo No. 8) Adjournment Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the City Clerk at 612-861-9738. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Office of City Manager March 16, 2017 Council Memorandum No. 28 HRA Memorandum No. 8 Housing and Redevelopment The Honorable Mayor Authority Commissioners And City of Richfield Members of the City Council Subject: Consideration of Forming an Economic Development Authority Council Members: As part of its 2016 goalsetting process, the City Council directed staff to "Explore other funding sources to expand Kids @ Home program [and other Community Development programs]." In the Proposed 2017 Budget presented to the City Council and HRA in August 2016, staff recommended a "stopgap" funding approach for Kids @ Home and for the Transformation Home Loans programs, but noted that we would be researching the establishment of an Economic Development Authority (EDA) as a way to better fund and manage these programs as well as more traditional economic development activities. Since that time, staff has learned more about the formation, operations, and powers of an EDA and has, with the help of HRA legal counsel Julie Eddington (of Kennedy & Graven) and City/HRA financial advisor Rebecca Kurtz (of Ehlers, Inc.), put together a relevant "Q&A" document (attached). Staff is recommending this as a topic for further City Council and HRA discussion and has scheduled a Special Joint Work Session of the City Council and Richfield HRA on Monday, March 20 at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Steven L. 'Devich City Manager SLD:jcs Email: Assistant City Manager Department Directors Attachments City of Richfield Economic Development Authority Q&A What is an EDA? • An EDA is an Economic Development Authority • Legally authorized by Minnesota Statutes 469.09 through 469.108 • Any municipal body can have an EDA (regardless of whether they have any other type of development authority — such as an HRA) How does an EDA differ from an HRA? • See attached chart What cities have multiple development authorities? • Woodbury (EDA & HRA) • St. Louis Park (EDA & HRA) • Bloomington (Port Authority and an HRA) • St. Paul (Port Authority and an HRA) • Belle Plaine (EDA & HRA) • White Bear Lake (Port Authority and an HRA) • Minneapolis has Port Authority powers that may be utilized by the City Council and the MCDA • Columbia Heights (EDA & HRA) • South St. Paul (EDA & HRA) • Coon Rapids (EDA & HRA) Why would Richfield want an EDA in addition to our HRA? • To provide a consistent funding source for activities that we are already doing which are EDA eligible (e.g. Transformation Home Loans) • To fund other existing City/HRA programs in order to free up City/HRA funding for Kids @ Home • To fund existing "economic development" activities • To provide a funding source for new activities designed to assist the local business community When (and how) would we consider adding the EDA authority? • In order to establish an EDA the City Council must adopt an Enabling Resolution. • Staff is recommending that these actions be taken in May (to coincide with staff budget preparation) and become effective on January 1, 2018. Who would serve on the EDA Board? • Either the City Council or HRA could also serve as the board of commissioners for an EDA • A separately appointed body could also serve, but staff would advise against that Do they have to have separate meetings? How frequent? • Yes, even if the membership of the EDA were coincidental to the membership of the City Council or HRA, they would still need to conduct a separate meeting. • At this point, staff would recommend a monthly meeting added onto the end of either the HRA or City Council meeting. It is possible, especially in the early days of this body, the agenda might be very brief. How much could a Richfield EDA levy? Based on the preliminary Pay 2017 market value for the City of Richfield, an EDA levy could generate up to $561,017 annually. What would this mean in terms of financial impact on an average Richfield household? A typical Richfield single family home with a value of $175 - $200,000 would be taxed 28 to 33 cents per year (see attached memo from Rebecca Kurtz of Ehlers Associates, Inc.) What can an EDA fund? • Loans for Economic Development • Provide Seed or Venture Capital for the establishment or growth of private businesses • Advance funds for Development and Redevelopment • Studies for Economic Development • Housing and Housing Loans What (specifically) would an EDA in Richfield fund? • The precise amounts of each of these items would be presented this summer as part of the normal City budget process Existing Programs • Transformation Home Loans • Open to Business (including marketing) • Dues/participation in the Chamber of Commerce and EDAM • Staffing for all of the above (at 10-15% of project/program costs) New Initiatives • Business Facade Improvement Loan/Grant • Apartment Remodeling Grant (requiring tenant preservation) Other Potential Uses • Staff and legal/financial consultants are continuing to explore whether an EDA could directly fund Kids @ Home, the existing Bike Rack Cost -Share Program and a Public Arts Fund 10 IE H L -F -IRIS LEADERS IN (PUBLIC IF If�AIhICE Memo ra: John Stark, City of Richfield I..°'lh°Ihll; Rebecca Kurtz, Ehlers Date: March 15, 2017 Subject: Estimated EDA Levy Impact Following up to our discussion, an EDA may have its City levy a tax up to 0.01813% of estimated market value for the benefit of the EDA. The City may increase this levy by following the "reverse referendum" procedure specified in the Statute. Based on the preliminary Pay 2017 market value for the City of Richfield, an EDA levy could generate up to $561,017 annually. The estimated annual tax impact of the maximum levy follows: TAX IMPACT ANALYSIS Estimated Proposed Type of Property Market Value City Tax $ 75,000 $ 0.08 100,000 0.13 125,000 0.18 150,000 0.23 Residential 175,000 0.28 Homestead 200,000 0.33 225,000 0.38 250,000 0.43 300,000 0.53 400,000 0.72 $ 100,000 $ 0.27 200,000 0.59 Commercial/Industrial 300,000 0.95 400,000 1.31 500,000 1.68 1,000,000 3.49 Apartments $ 200,000 $ 0.45 (4 or more units) 500,000 1.13 1,000,000 2.27 The money obtained from the levy could be used for any purpose for which the City's general fund moneys could be used. A chart summarizing EDA and HRA governance and powers is attached. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions. r'1 lrr , ISI(".col.I M 7t M M M M M N 00 01 y 7G •'rbb U '�" y " O O c� cn s pp y .1-v� cC 4a U y �," o �, >'UD o Q E o a.N o o " a a It O U y y �: bA Oa CD, 'C L/1Tt U Q It _ -- Q1 J1 N N 01 O J1 a, a1 a1 J1 U1 d1 cON 110 I's 't � It ct y >1It O Ln cn rz cr y cc itcr y y y :� a ••J L" O D C), U z > O ^� y QOn V +� yS1 pr U c�C n p O bA �' C'r � � O ° 8�8� 0 N m M m O m p ` O -- Dorn O oc a, 41 41 01 7t cn U �--1 i•i F Y Qhs i-.I �--, �' ' .�.� • O Q y Q� O`n En O V] . c U � y cr a� c� 42 21 o a 00 00 0 -- � � Tt a Tt � � o cz O U U W to J O p y y O cC 424 �.. U����Ho -415 r c� f' U > U .� cn >,�rO\l � yU_, U • r, rr°ll w cQJ 0 0 w o tj � a ZU ULU U O H UUW y NpN N N Nrq No N� o 0 0 0 0 0 H-. ct ct �--' U� bn Q Q 0 42 O v7 d 0 y 71 'C CC En y b�A O 0 bA y ¢ U "� Lk - n v '� 0 ,� U �b > '0 w0 b1) U a� cn vo cr v cr v til ~ Ocn N V O �- � U cC U cn E5 InEn U U O NCL U y U Ln Q" s.. vi "O Zn wn �.un o� •� UU Ud A UUQ'daddN C) o yU a1 M to bq i U � � �' O ' O O t� -• O = sa, 41 N M CD CJ C CJ N QJ U y •� � QJ U .� > Q O m00 � yy O N , r Rq60 Rrci 60 .. co it U 40 'a c 1 v o a� Qjl^~ A c a [M A y U y y w a, a1 U CIO O U O y O bA j, U U O cn N ¢ cd bb O bfl • O U -� S"• U y un i, cr�, aj c U cn U d s; r O Q •cr ,y J O cn y j CZ - un tb o � a m o t� y ea v Ao Qj 0 x''�1 x� Ufx xa�1 Wal �f�