11-20-95 agendaCITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1995
REGULAR HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF (1) SPECIAL HRA MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1995; (2)
REGULAR HRA MEETING OF OCTOBER 16, 1995; (3) SPECIAL HRA, CITY COUNCIL
AND PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION OF OCTOBER 24, 1995; (4) SPECIAL
HRA, CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 9, 1995;
AND (5) SPECIAL HRA, CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 14, 1995
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE HRA ON ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
2. DISCUSSION BY REPRESENTATIVES OF HOUSING SERVICES INCORPORATED
OF HOUSING CONCEPT FOR AMERICAN LEGION SITE AND STATUS OF
SELECTION OF FACILITY PLANNER FOR JOINTLY USED AMERICAN LEGION
AND VFW POST
HRA LETTER NO. 69
3. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED HRA "TOGETHER WE CAN" ECONOMIC SELF-
SUFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR APARTMENT RESIDENTS
HRA LETTER NO. 70
4. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO CSM PHASE II, SHOPS AT
LYNDALE
HRA LETTER NO. 71
5. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE
OF 7021 NICOLLET AVENUE AND 7537 GIRARD AVENUE (CONTINUED FROM
OCTOBER 16, 1995)
HRA LETTER NO. 72
6. (1) PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
SALE OF RICHFIELD REDISCOVERED PROPERTY AT 6715-14TH AVENUE TO
BUILDER D.L. RUSSELL CO. AND BUYER RICHARD AND NANCY KROSSIN;
(2) CANCELLATION OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING FOR SALE OF 7200
THIRD AVENUE WHICH WAS CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 16, 1995; AND
(3) CANCELLATION OF SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING FOR SALE OF 7344
BRYANT AVENUE
HRA LETTER NO. 73
7. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF 1996 HRA PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX
LEVY AND BUDGET
HRA LETTER NO. 74
8. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
9. CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests
must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at
861-9702.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. ~4
Agenda November 20, 1995
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and adoption of the 1996 HRA proposed property tax levy and budget.
Background:
At the August 21, 1995 meeting, the HRA adopted a preliminary levy according to the
Truth-in-Taxation law. That levy was then forwarded to the City Council and adopted
with the City's preliminary levy.
The Truth-in-Taxation law does not require any further action by the HRA, .nor does it
require a public hearing on the final tax levy and/or budget. The HRA levy will be
included as part of the City's final levy document which will be considered at the City's
Truth-in-Taxation hearing on December 6, 1995.
However, a public hearing on the proposed HRA 1996 budget and tax levy has been
scheduled for November 20, 1995 to provide for public input. At the conclusion of the
hearing, the HRA should adopt a final budget and tax levy for 1996 to be forwarded to
the City Council. The HRA budget resolutions are included with the budget document
and represent official action on those items by the HRA.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the resolutions adopting a 1996 HRA budget and property tax levy for 1996.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The HRA approved the Proposed 1996 Budget and Proposed 1996 HRA General
Fund and Relocation Information Fund tax levies at its August 21 meeting.
2. The HRA should now take official action to finalize the HRA budget and tax levy.
3. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Richfield Sun Current on
November 8, 1995.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The HRA could select another meeting date before December 6, 1995 to consider
these items. However, there would be little time to publish a timely notice.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
It is recommended that the HRA take action on the HRA budget and property tax levy
on November 20, 1995.
R ully submitted,
Ja .Prosser
Exec ive Director
JDP:cak
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REVISION OF THE 1995 BUDGET OF THE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF RICHFIELD
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 533 appropriated funds for personal services and
other expenses and capital outlay for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the
year 1995, and
WHEREAS, the Executive Director has requested a revision of the 1995 budget
as detailed in the 1996 budget document.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. That the 1995 appropriation for the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority General Fund be revised as follows:
$237,300 Increase
Section 2. Estimated 1995 gross revenue of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority General Fund from all sources, as the same are more fully
detailed in the Executive Director's official copy of the 1996 budget
document, are hereby revised as follows:
$ 68,690 Increase
Section 3. That the 1995 revenue and appropriations for Relocation Information
Services and Assistance be revised as follows:
$ 0 Increase
Section 4. That the Executive Director bring into effect the provisions of this
resolution.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota this 20th day of November, 1995.
Thomas E. Harms, Chair
ATTEST:
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING 1996 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BUDGET AND CERTIFYING THE 1996 TAX LEVY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota as follows:
Section 1. The budget for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
General Fund of Richfield for the year 1996 in the amount of
$459,850 is hereby ratified.
Section 2. The estimated gross revenue of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority General Fund of Richfield from all sources, including
general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year
1996, and as the same are more fully detailed in the Executive
Director's official copy of the budget for the year 1996, in the
amount of $434,030 are hereby approved.
Section 3. There is hereby levied upon all taxable property in the City of
Richfield an ad valorem tax in 1995, payable in 1996 for the
following purposes:
Housing and Redevelopment Authority $149,800
Relocation Information Services and
Assistance
$ 14,950
Section 4. A certified copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the County
Auditor.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota this 20th day of November, 1995.
ATTEST:
Thomas E. Harms, Chair
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. ~3
Agenda November 20, 1995
Issue Statement:
1. Public hearing and consideration of a resolution authorizating the sale of Richfield
Rediscovered property at 6715-14th Avenue to builder D.L. Russell Co. and the
buyer Richard and Nancy Krossin.
2. Cancellation of scheduled public hearing for sale of 7200 Third Avenue which was
continued from October 16, 1995.
3. Cancellation of scheduled public hearing for sale of 7344 Bryant Avenue.
Background:
The HRA has acquired 7344 Bryant and 7200 Third Avenues and authorized the
acquisition of 6715-14th Avenue under the Richfield Rediscovered Program. New Ford
Town residents Richard and Nancy Krossin and a builder, Don L. Russell, have agreed
to build a $135,000 three bedroom split entry home at 6715-14th Avenue. The sale
price of the lot is $30,000. The buyer and builder have proposed working together
contractually as a team on this project.- The development agreement is in the process
of being adjusted to accommodate that change. However, the essential elements of
the contract remain unchanged:
• Provide $30,000 as financial security during the construction period.
• Complete the home by May 31, 1996.
• Pay for the lot upon completion of construction.
The public hearing to sell 7344 Bryant Avenue to Parsley Builders should be cancelled
while house plans and the construction schedule are finalized by the builder and buyer.
A winter to spring 1996 construction start is envisioned.
The buyer at 7200 Third Avenue (a New Ford Town resident) has withdrawn interest
and decided to purchase an existing Richfield home. This also requires cancellation of
the public hearing.
Recommended Motion:
Following the public hearing, adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the Chair
and Executive Director to execute an agreement which sells 6715 14th Avenue to
Richard and Nancy Krossin and Don Russell Co. for development of a new single family
home.
In addition, cancel the scheduled public hearing concerning the sale of 7344 Bryant
Avenue and 7200 Third Avenue for new home development.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Don Russell is an experienced and capable builder. The acquisition of the
Krossin's New Ford Town home by MAC in November provides the financial
resources for the parties to perform.
2. The HRA has authorized the acquisition of 6715 14th Avenue for the Richfield
Rediscovered Program. (Acquisition will occur by the end of November.)
3. A development agreement is being negotiated and is in conformance with
program guidelines.
4. Notice of public hearings were published in the Sun-Current on November 8,
1995.
5. The buyer of the property at 7200 Third Avenue has withdrawn from the program
so that the public hearing should be cancelled.
6. Steven Parsley, the builder of 7344 Bryant, has requested a delay in starting the
project at that location. When details are finalized, the sale can be arranged.
Alternative Recommendation:
Direct staff to find other buyers.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Closing is anticipated to occur in early December following site clearance at 14th
Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
James tosser
Executive irector
JDP:ds
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
6715-14TH AVENUE TO D.L. RUSSELL CO. AND RICHARD AND NANCY KROSSIN
IN ACCORDANCE WITH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota (HRA) desires to develop certain real property pursuant to and in
furtherance of the Richfield Rediscovered Program Redevelopment Project (Project)
heretofore adopted by the City of Richfield (City) and the HRA, said real property being
described as follows:
Address Legal
6715-14th Avenue Block 4, Richfield's Addition, North 66.5 ft. of South
381.5 ft. of West 131.3 ft., Hennepin County
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized to sell real property within its area of
operation after public hearing; and
WHEREAS, D.L. Russell Co. and Richard and Nancy Krossin have been
identified as the purchaser and developer of 6715-14th Avenue in accordance with a
development agreement; and
WHEREAS, the public hearings have been held after proper public notice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Richfield Housing and
Redevelopment Authority:
1. A public hearing has been held and 6715-14th Avenue is authorized to be
sold to D.L. Russell Co. and Richard and Nancy Krossin in accordance with a
development agreement with the HRA.
2. The purchase price for 6715-14th Avenue is $30,000.
3. The Chairperson and Executive Director are authorized to execute the
Development Agreement and other agreements as required to effectuate the
sale.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota this 20th day of November, 1995.
Thomas E. Harms, Chair
ATTEST:
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
a~
~~
LL
~~
N
Z
O
a
W
W
1^'
~ '~' Z
.f
~~ a
~~
S ~ W
Z
N ~
W
~~ a
'! W
~, ~
I
'1
O
~~ ~ a
a W
N
W
N
I.W
i.3~ ~~ ~ ; ,~..._
.:rf~~c~:.•
..~..
h ~`4rt}~ 4
}-~"" ^'-
:.a."-
., -~ ,
' i;l' ~I
~ ~, ~,\ I ~- ,_
i `I ;`~?\
.a ~. J
' i ~_._
.I
u
I Ili \.
i i!
i ~ ~ ~ P ~ '~
' ' ~.:r~,~~~
_y, ~„~..
•• Y'~~f ~ j ~ i .\\t
- ~, ~:\+S
/ ~..~ ~ .1
` I
`.' _~~`~. a.. ~.~
. ,. - .J.'
~•F~ .. .. ~ it
~~ ~ j ~ ~
~,
O W
a a.
W r
?^ ~
o ~
~ Y.
~ ` ~, ~'
~ „~ 1
EI Duwni[. Pad. LTfMfr1 !~ ' LLDZooN I •
j BC'O4.ae,±~
- ~ ---- - If' v' 43v
D;b ~ ~°''' ~ -
!.r'J
Q ~~ e
~~
~'
33~~ ~ A
I ~ N I ~S 8 1 ~! Q.
_ -~
~- ~
X xyn _ O `-
4tp°t' 11 it.~t. [Z ' ~-~.~~ .~~v - c
_ ~_.f~4Y'_1__r
f ~irr. a•s.T /Z" 4 p Q~ v~6~x~irt EO ~o i.ocC
i :1.1RV ^~~~f_ ~L
~6 ~
T^• •.
_ ~.
r 7~ r fJF~ %~
Ze
.,~~.
UPPER LEVEL r -~----'~
~~ ~
~'
r
~ 5e Couc OGL I ~- ~!J~~_-_~II
'bxb CauG ~-rt,
~ I~ II II i
1~_J _~~L YY ® ,I
Zrt ~~ yc
i R W~ W ~tieL M• - ~ _`` _ Wr6 CeIdG P7.
U ~-
I ~-~ ~ ,_ IL_I I
L• Z- ,; ,~ ~-;il
__
i `i ~-JI I
- ~~I - ' `'~i -
_ L_ _ _.- _--- -- -__-_ -_ _ __
~_ - _ .. i uP ~ I-rt - -- - - -
i ' ,., I- ti~ ~, I s
..~ ~ i
'~
~--- --'~ -- i
i~~ ~~ ~
~ ~~ ~b ~~ ~ ~ I LOWER LEVEL
~ I _ _ ~~ .I
-~__ --
I __.,~
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. 72
Agenda November 20, 1995
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and consideration of resolution authorizing sale of 7021 Nicollet Avenue
and 7537 Girard Avenue. (Continued from October 16, 1995.)
Background:
The construction project at 7021 Nicollet Avenue was authorized by the HRA in April
1994; the project at 7537 Girard was authorized in August 1994; both were cooperative
projects with Hennepin Technical College (HTC). The projects are completed and sales
are anticipated by the end of the year.
The selected buyer for the home on Nicollet is a three member, income-qualified family,
currently renting an apartment in Burnsville. The selected buyer for the home on Girard
is a six member family currently renting a townhome in Edina. Both families meet the
requirements stated in Attachment A. HRA authorization and a public hearing
authorizing the sale of the properties is required prior to final processing.
Both homes are being sold for $105,000. Buyers are each making a down payment of
at least $4,500. They will apply for a mortgage in the amount of $85,500 (one FHA,
one conventional, respectively). The difference between the estimated market value
and the initial purchase price, $15,000, is provided by the HRA in the form of a second
mortgage. Project costs are covered by the buyers' down payment and first mortgages.
The second mortgage accomplishes the following:
1.. Makes the initial purchase price of $90,000 affordable.
2. Prevents a speculative purchase in which the buyer might benefit from selling the
home quickly.
The HRA will pay up to 2 points for mortgage discounting per property (approximately
$1,710) and the cost of title insurance (approximately $200) at closing. After closing,
the HTC contracts will be paid. These costs have been anticipated in the budget and
.will be paid by the proceeds of sale.
If during final processing the families are found ineligible by the lender, the purchase
agreements are void and earnest money will be released. At this time however, the
lender has qualified the purchasers through the preliminary processing.
The HRA had an opportunity to inspect the completed work during an open house that
was held August 21, 1995.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that following the public hearing, the HRA adopt the attached
resolution which authorizes the disposition of the HRA owned properties at 7021
Nicollet and 7537 Girard Avenues.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Two qualified families have been identified as purchasers and meet program
requirements.
2. Purchase agreements cannot be processed further by the lender without HRA
authorization of sale.
3. A public hearing notice has been published in the Sun-Current which allows the
HRA to consider the sale at the November 20, 1995 meeting.
4. The Planning Commission has determined that the sale for residential purposes is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Alternative Recommendation:
Do not adopt the resolution. However, this would cause a delay in the sale of the
properties, be confusing to the buyers, and would increase HRA holding costs.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Authorization of the sale is required at the November 20, 1995 meeting so that the
buyers can finalize mortgage financing for a prompt closing.
Respectfully bmitted,
James D osser
Executive irector
JDP:ds
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT
7021 NICOLLET AVENUE AND 7537 GIRARD AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) owns certain real
property located at 7021 Nicollet Avenue, legally described as attached; and 7537
Girard Avenue, legally described as Lot 15, Block 19, Irwin Shores Addition; and
WHEREAS, the HRA acquired the properties so that Hennepin Technical
College (HTC) could construct two new single family homes to be sold by the HRA to
moderate income families; and
WHEREAS, the Bright and Elrashidi families have been identified as qualified
purchasers for 7021 Nicollet and 7537 Girard Avenues, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the conditions of sale include a total sales price of $105,000 per
property; a first mortgage each of $85,500 payable to the lender; a lien of $15,000 per
property, payable to the HRA and $4,500 downpayment per property; and
.WHEREAS, the sale of 7021 Nicollet and 7537 Girard Avenues may be
authorized by the HRA following a public hearing which considers the disposition of the
properties; and
WHEREAS, that hearing has been held following proper publication of notice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Richfield, Minnesota that the HRA Chairperson and
Executive Director are authorized to execute the purchase agreement and other
required documents so that the disposition of HRA owned properties at 7021 Nicollet
and 7537 Girard Avenues occurs as presented herein.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota this 20th day of November, 1995.
Thomas E. Harms, Chair
ATTEST:
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
Legal Description
for
7021 Nicollet Avenue
The part of West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of
Section 34, Township 28 North, Range 24 West of the 4th Principal Meridian described
as follows: Commencing at a point on the West line of West 1/2 of Northwest 1/4 of
Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of said section, township and range, distant 330.60 feet
South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the center line of Nicollet
Avenue thence South along said West line 59.5 feet, thence East 166.38 feet to a point
389.96 feet South of North line of said Northwest 1/4 of Northeast 1/4; thence North
59.5 feet to a point which is 166.39 feet East of point of beginning; thence West to point
of beginning, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
ATTACHMENT A
7021 NICOLLET
NEW HOME PROGRAM
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
FOR
HOME BUYERS
• Have a 3 to 6 member family (a family. is defined as persons related by blood,
marriage or operation of law).
• Be a first-time home buyer (or have not owned in 3 years).
• Have the following maximum annual income depending upon family size:
Family Size Maximum Income
3 $36,200
4 $40,200
5 $43,400
6 $46,600
This income is 80% of the metropolitan area median income - an
accepted CDBG program income level.
• Have the ability to make monthly payments on a $85,500 mortgage, pay $4,500
down, and pay closing costs required of the buyer.
• Agree to be subject to a lien by the HRA for the difference between the initial sales
price and the actual value.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. 71
Agenda November 20, 1995
Issue Statement:
Consideration of proposed modification to CSM Phase II Shops at Lyndale.
Background:
CSM is proposing a modification to Phase II. Under the approved plans there was to
be five one-story retail spaces of various square footages (see attached). However,
recen#ly representatives of Galyan's Trading Company approached CSM about space
in Phase II. Galyan's is a retail store merchandising mid-priced to upper end
sportswear and sporting goods. Much of their sales are based on the customer "trying
out" the merchandise before completing a purchase.
The proposed revision would increase the number of square feet of retail space.
Approved Phase II 114,000 square feet (approximately)
Proposed Phase II 130,000 square feet (approximately)
The footprint for the buildings would be smaller because Galyan's would be a two-story
facility with 50,000 square feet per floor.
The number of parking spaces would also be modified:
Approved Phase II 520 spaces
Proposed Phase II 616 spaces
The additional parking would be provided west of Galyan's and east of Colfax Avenue
(see .attached).
The two-story portion of Phase II will be higher than Phase I. Phase I roof height is 28
feet while the height of the principal portion of the roof of Galyan's would be 42 feet.
The Phase I tower height is approximately 61 feet. There would be no lights on the
north wall. The atrium will be lighted and the north end will have tinted glass. Lighting
will not be directed outward but the lighting will make it visible at night.
Under the Contract For Private Development, the HRA must approve revisions to the
concept plan. If approvals are provided by the HRA, Planning Commission and City
Council an opening in the fall of 1996 is expected. Land's End would open in the spring
of 1996. Representatives of CSM will be present at the November 20 HRA meeting to
present the proposal.
Recommended Motion:
Approve the proposed Phase 11 modification.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Galyan's is a respected retailer and this would be their first store in this market area
2. Staff representatives from a variety of City divisions have reviewed the concept and
approved it.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Delay action
2. Reject the proposal
Discussion/Decision Mode:
CSM would like to order steel by December 15 to assure opening of Galyan's in the fall
of 1996. Phase II construction has been halted subject to the outcome of processing
the proposed modification. If the modification is approved, demolition of some of the
newly constructed walls would be undertaken.
Respectful) submitted,
James rosser
Executive Director
JDP:ds
•
~~
m
-~
z
~_
Z
V
Z
to
yn
r
m
0
O
O
0
~~I
~iC:t,',;5~ S
:1?"~1f11`~l
:\~:`\\\;i~s
~~~'~\~
5,.~3:>i~~u~
D
m
O
-A
g:dts3:
~
R:
~,[o fR~~I
p°'''O:
:~
~: . f:
~, .o.
~; ~' ,
~'
'>
~i..~ '~: d'1'
_ yO M~~
ti
~
•~ •fR0•
~N~M g
:~
'
1•
.U .(JL V P
~
~
~ P
b
N
•
.
;~ .~. q ~
* ~
~ .T.N~~ y1
~
N.
:~:N;
:a .o,.l, ~ <
~ ~"~
y.
'
:~., '~'~
'W' 1 1 N ,~,~
:~ Nol 1 Q
[(,~~1 ~ (O~R,
.~ .~j. ~~TT~
~
.~ :
W'
'~ '~'~.
.{(• ^.
.N .
.
V
(
p~
.+ :N:
~
~
.
.
.
.
y
1 ~ n>
~ i
V
~ ~~
-'
! ~' 1 1 h az`rrcrs
1 ~ m
tD
n I ~
I ~ ~,
~,
m I I
-- - r---r ---
~
=
D I
i ~
~m
cb m ~ o -N-+
o ~ C u
I 1 ~ ~ ~
^
1 I '
i
I
I A
I N V1
1 m m
'' `'
I I N ,~ ~
I i r -<
i Wo
1 z
{
1 1
I
cn
I 1
1
I
45' cn
0
°•
1
I I
1
ul
I
~
1 I
~
(
i ~
24'
z
~
1
~
1 1
I
N
i
I
I 1
it
t
~
W
~
I.
I I
~ ~ m=1
~~
~
I ~ I ~' cZi
I
I ~m I
y I
~
~ . ,
1 ~
rn ~
~° ~ ~
~
I ~
i P
-. c5
I 1 w ~
i ~
i 1 w v g
I 1
I 24' ~ <
{
1
f ~
~
~
1 ~ ~
~ A
I 1 ~
a
. I 1
I 1
I 1
I I y
a `
1. I
I 1
I I
1 I
I _
>
°c
a
_
i a
~ ~ ~
~ ~
`O ~
m
v
<
~ ~
~
~
~
-gyp \
ti`
• In rn
mo ~
~
rn
~ m
~e N
ti
~~~ ~ ~i
\ 'o
~
C z ~
~
~
~ ~~
~ m
~
'
=
N O
_yy
p
f~
V
Z
• •
Z5 :b0:1ti 966b 'bl: 'noN u6p•0-TI\Ia?~Uo?~\zsue(,te6\u
4)
~N
N Z
W -C
v
P'
25' 1 38' I 25' I 361 I 25'
1
1 1
I I
I
1 1
1 1
i ~
i i
L-----------I-----
COLF~
00048QDUIIU - - r-----------r----
I ~
~ 1
I
1 1
1 1
I I
A 1 i
mz N I I
mn 1 1
1 1
c ~----- - --~ ----
~'' Z m I I
~~ I
r :c I I
~ 1 1
o z I I
r 1 1
I 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
~ L-----------i-----
O
r
BRYAI
I I
1 1
I
i i
TYP.
~`\
:11
g ----
~ ~! ,'~\
\\\
~o ~
~~~`~
D_
m
0
--~
1
n \ I i i
NZ I I I I
X 1 1
A
~ W o ~ ~-----------~-----
W 1 1
~ ~ i i
1 1
~
~ N I I
$-C
~ 0
o 1 1
I I
~
~"
g ~ W
f
A
V/
'
~ ~
Z I I
1 1
~ y I I
1
1 1
~ ' ~ I I
~
r 1 1
1
1
g
~' ~ y ~
1
p
;
',
\ ~ \
•
~ ---------
-- -
--
---
`
,~`
126' u w
q
r ~
`:
'
•
i
`i'
' it'ai'
~ ~
^
~:
.`
`
118'
'~
~
.
*;
fi't`.\~i ~,i~• ?\, ~t`~i i i
'
~
-
i,\\\1;1.1\:~y`~\\t~•~• 1 1
• \ \\\'\Z'-1111: \ - • 1
a •. \ • 1 ..
~;~ ~\~'~l':~~~(Q ~\\~`~\`~1\t.~ ~1.~`.1ti1 \\1'\\-`1\1 l~`il~ :~1~\\\
I I
L-----------I-----
------------
--
-a
- ~ r
r
~~
-~ 1 ~ ~ I I
-
~
v
~ ~~P i
r I
1 1
'
;
~ I I
~N
I
m ' '
DZ c>
l
{ ( I
> ~nc~m
~ N=
°
x
sa ~ g
l
.~r Z
~
'
~
„ ~ o
~ I I 1
m I----IAN 1 p c~i I
~ I n t '' °z I
I I I I
1 1
~ • ul v I I I
x ~,
~
I
~ i
~ ~
~
I ~
r
~
~
L 1 1
L
1
~
.=.T~.
. .._~~
..
- ------------
--
:..: ~
E--S3PNl OMl "'
f ~ `~
gm m$ m~ LYNDALE AVE. SOUTH
n w~ ~~ TWO LANES ~
f!) Z CN Z
rn
~
C
_
1
yam
r
z -^------------
m ~
.~
A
l~-~
~~
~~
~~'
t ~~
L
$ ~'
W ~
~~
3
a ~~
1 ~-
a
e~
:~ .~
~w
f
r.. ~
s
',a
~ ~
~
~~
r• ~ karn~ w~~
L
u ~ i
i i
,. ~~~
c~ ~ °' ~
~ ~
~~~ f~!
;~
~ ~ ~,~~ o
r~~
~ ~Yl+
i ~ ~t
l
~1
t'
~ ~ ~
,..~„
n~ iwa
SHOPS AT LYNDALE '
""' ~ ~c~rs c...•s..
~,~ ~~
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. ~o
Agenda November 20, 1995
Issue Statement:
Approval of the proposed HRA "Together We Can" economic self-sufficiency program
for apartment residents. (A copy of the proposed program is attached to this letter.)
Background:
In August, the HRA was presented with a proposal to initiate a one year pilot economic
self-sufficiency~program. Additional time for consideration and also the opinion of the
City Council on the proposal were requested. The City Council discussed the proposal
on November 6 and endorsed it. They requested the HRA to consider an alternative to
providing 50% of the funding from the Development Fund.
"Together We Can" (TWC) is an outgrowth of the success of the Community Apartment
Program (CAP). Much of CAP efforts have been directed at apartment owners and
managers. The focus of TWC would be apartment residents. TWC proposes to
eliminate the dependency of some apartment residents on government assistance by
linking them with existing program resources. TWC would have afull-time coordinator
officed in one of the "Sage properties" (Heritage Square or Hampton Place).
TWC would compliment CAP efforts by having its focus on the apartment resident;
• Census data obtained from South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency
(SHeRPA) indicated that approximately 1/3 (72) of the children who live in the
census tract in which Hampton Place and Heritage Square are located live in
poverty.
• Families in poverty face multiple barriers to economic self-sufficiency (lack of
education, lack of skills, lack of transportation, lack of child care, etc.).
• Families in poverty simply do not know what services are available and which
ones they are qualified to receive. (SHeRPA and others have come to this
conclusion.)
• Richfield Apartment Owners and Managers Association (RAMA) members have
expressed frustration with being called upon by apartment residents to make
referrals.
The purpose of the TWC coordinator would be to help participants identify and `sort out'
their barriers to self-sufficiency and refer them to existing service providers.
Beginning in the early 1990's, HUD encouraged housing authorities to initiate self-
sufficiency programs. Several authorities are already administering self-sufficiency
programs including:
Bloomington
Red Wing
Duluth
Crookston
Fergus Falls
Kandiyohi/McLeod County
Minneapolis
St. Paul
While the programs vary, the common thread is: 1) the recognition that impoverished
families experience barriers to self-sufficiency; 2) that impoverished families will not be
able to overcome the barriers unless someone helps them identify available existing
resources designed to deal with the barriers; and 3) encourages them to "link up" with
the services.
TWC proposes a pilot program for one year officed in either Heritage Square or
Hampton Place. Its uniqueness would be the coordinator working near the participant's
home from an apartment unit. Also, some of the organizations providing services may
do so from the TWC office. This concept is reflective of the most current thinking on the
delivery of service to clients -that it needs to be relationship based and close to home.
An objective of CAP is to better integrate apartments into the community. The
beginning point was providing support to owners and managers. TWC provides an
opportunity to assist apartment residents with this integration. Economically self-
sufficient apartment residents would participate more fully in the community.
The HRA has approved the acquisition of three apartment communities from the Sage
Company. The HRA will become an apartment owner. A primary reason for the
acceptance of the `gift' was to provide an opportunity to pilot innovations which could be
transferred to other apartment communities. TWC provides such an opportunity for
piloting.
The TWC report recommends that the HRA enter into a contract with an existing
organization which would supply the services of a coordinator. Being part of a larger
organization, the coordinator would be able to draw on a broader base of support to `get
the job done'. The proposed budget is $54,000 and appears on page 8 of the TWC
Final Report. The HRA proposed budget for `95-'96 (page 19) identifies the
expenditures associated with this proposal. Approximately one-half of the cost would
be funded by the Section 8 Program fund balance and the other half was proposed for
the Development Fund. Section 8 funds are appropriate because HUD has authorized
the use of fund balances for this purpose. Also, since participation would be open to
Section 8 participants and non-Section 8 participants a second source of funds is
necessary. The City Council has requested alternatives to the Development Fund be
considered. The HRA may wish to evaluate: a) HRA General Fund, and b) donation
from Sage.
Finally, staff has identified a very unique partnership operating in Brooklyn Park. Real
Estate Equities owns and manages Eden Park of approximately 400 units. Eden Park
was in need of renovation. Real Estate Equities purchased the property with
assistance from the city and federal tax credits. As a corporation, they concluded that
in the 1990's enlightened management should be based on a vision that said people
who resided in Eden Park could have better lives. To achieve this objective they hired
New Foundations of St. Paul, anon-profit corporation, to offer a full array of supportive
housing services (see attached flyer titled Eden Park).
Recommended Motion:
1. Adopt a motion approving implementation of the "Together We Can" economic self-
sufficiency program.
2. Select the non-Section 8 funding source.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Families in poverty face multiple barriers to self-sufficiency.
2. Available data indicates that many apartment residents could benefit from aself-
sufficiency program.
3. TWC offers an opportunity to better integrate apartment residents into the
community which is an objective of CAP.
4. Potential participants do not know what services are available to them and which
ones they may be qualified to utilize.
5. Participants would be referred to existing organizations.
6. RAMA members are often called upon by apartment residents to act as referrals
resources which is a further indication of need.
7. HUD has been encouraging all Section 8 authorities to administer self-sufficiency
programs and now, in some instances, requires them.
8. A full-time coordinator would be charged with operating the program on a pilot
basis.
9. The HRA is in part accepting the Sage `gift' to try new ideas in apartment operation
and management.
10. Funds are available from the Section 8 fund balance and the General Fund.
11. Persons who evaluate social service delivery systems have concluded that when
the delivery of those services is personalized success is greater. With the TWC
officing in an apartment, personalization will be achieved.
12. The Richfield Human Services Planning Council has endorsed the TWC concept.
Camillo DeSantis, Chair of the Council, was a member on the TWC advisory group.
13. Experience in other cities with similar programs indicates that police calls can be
reduced.
14. Programs like TWC may increase stability.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Reject the proposal.
2. Suggest modifications.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A response from the HRA on November 20, 1995 would make it possible to begin
implementation.
Respectfu submitted,
James rosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
Proposal Summary
for
"Together We Can"
Self-Sufficiency Program
John Starke
November, 1995
What is economic self-sufficiency?
In this report, economic self-sufficiency means that one is no longer dependent on receiving
food stamps, housing assistance, or other forms of government assistance.
What are the barriers to becoming economically self-sufficient?
A 1993 survey of "Family Needs of Low Income Tenants in Bloomington and Richfield," partially
funded by Richfield's HRA, indicates individuals face multiple barriers to economic self-
sufficiency. They find it difficult to get employment or to retain employment because of a lack
of skills and training, lack of adequate transportation, lack of affordable child care, a need for
counseling, etc.
Why is there a need for aself-sufficiency program?
Service providers have their particular mission and goals but there is not a centralized way for
service providers to work together cooperatively to address an individual's need.
South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency (SHRPA) research indicates that the greatest difficulty
for individuals is accessing the appropriate services they are qualified to receive. Individuals
either don't know what services are available or they don't know what services they are
qualified to receive. The "Together We Can" Coordinator will help participants "sort out" their
issues as to why they are not economically self-sufficient and begin the process of connecting
them to the appropriate services they are qualified to receive. Some of these services may
include; affordable day care, job training, counseling, career counseling, and resources to
address remedial education.
Who would provide assistance?
It is recommended that HRA contract with a service agency, e.g. "Family and Children's
Services," for the necessary services of a full-time coordinator for "Together We Can."
Who would be served?
Residents of the Sage Apartments would be the "pilot group" served by this program. Sage
Apartments include residents from Crestwood, Hampton Place and Heritage Square. (Hampton
Place and Heritage Square are located in Block Group 2 of tract 248.02. In 1989, 30% of the
children lived in poverty in this Block Group [see page 3 of this report].)
Where would the office/center for "Together We Can" be located?
It is recommended the office/center be located in one of the apartments at one of the Sage
Apartments. By having the office located in one of the apartments, it would:
• Be highly accessible to residents.
• Facilitate a trusting professional relationship between the coordinator and residents. This
relationship could increase the number of people served and better provide referrals that are
timely and matched to a resident's needs.
• Enable residents to access information and informational materials.
• Provide a space for job support groups and education support groups and various other
services offered through other agencies.
How does the program work?
The coordinator will meet with an individual to access needs and make necessary referrals. The
coordinator will also assist individuals with setting goals and planning the necessary steps to
achieve economic self-sufficiency. Steps may include career counseling, training, getting a
G.E.D., finding affordable child care, or being a part of a job search support group. The
coordinator would "track" the progress of individuals and would provide additional needed
referrals. (See pages 6 and 7 of this report.)
Cost
A one year budget of $54,080 is itemized on page 8 of this report.
When will the program begin?
January of 1996 the "Together We Can" program would begin. A detailed timeline is on page 13
of this report.
Commitment of time
This program will be for one year, subject to review.
"Together We Can"
Final Report
November, 1995
John Szarke
Throughout this project, I have met regularly with an advisory group consisting of:
Bruce Palmborg, Dennis Johnson, Camillo De Santis, Mike Welsh, Laura Klein and Bill
Schatzlein. I am grateful for their valuable input and assistance in formulating
recommendations for aself-sufficiency program in Richfield.
Recommendation for Implementation
of "Together We Can"
Self-Sufficiency Program
BACKGROUND
Individuals who are not economically self-sufficient often times feel overwhelmed by barriers
that keep them from self-sufficiency. Barriers such as fear, lack of skills, lack of education,
concerns for meeting basic human needs, and not knowing where to go to get available
resources keep people feeling trapped.
PURPOSE
"Together We Can" is a support service fora "Pilot Group" of Richfield residents who are
seeking to become economically self-sufficient.
MISSION
"Together We Can" helps individuals overcome barriers to self-sufficiency by providing
information about existing resources, and by offering support services designed to assist
individuals become economically self-sufficient.
GOAIS
• To provide individuals referrals to existing resources.
• To provide emotional support to participants.
• To provide timely information to participants.
2
NEED
This report confirms that there is a need for developing an economic self sufficiency program in
Richfield.
I have included some observations about poverty within block groups in three different tracts in
Richfield; Block Group 2 of 248.02; Block Group 1 of tract 249.02 and Block Group 1 of tract
249.03 (Exhibit B). These block groups in the selected tracts have a high percentage of renters
as is indicated in the following 1990 census information:
RICHFIELD TRACT TRACT TRACT
CITY 248.02 249.02 249.03
CHARACTERISTIC, 1990 BG2 BG1 BG
Total Population 35170 1415 1121 848
of households that own 67% 18% 64% 45%
of households that rent 33% 82% 36% 55%
CHILDREN IN POVERTY IN RICHFIELD
1. In the City of Richfield, 9% of children were in poverty in 1989. Poverty among children was
two to three times higher in the selected block groups of tract areas than in Richfield as a
whole.
2. These block groups had the following percentages:
a. In Block Group 2 of tract 248.02, 30% of the children lived in poverty (72 children in
poverty). (Hampton Place and Heritage Square of the Sage Apartments are located in this
block group).
b. In Block Group 1 of tract 249.02, 20% of the children lived in poverty (41 children in
poverty).
c. In Block Group 1 of tract 249.03, 24% of the children lived in poverty (56 children in
poverty).
3. It is also significant that poverty is higher. in single parent households (mostly female
headed) in Richfield, 27% of all single parent families with children under 18 were in poverty
in 1989. 60% of single parent families with children under age five were in poverty in 1989.
4. Eligibility for the free and reduced school lunch program is a reflection of families in
poverty. Eligibility has increased significantly in Richfield during the late 19$Os and early
1990s. The number of eligible students increased from 486 in the 1984/85 school year, to 983
in the 1992/93 school year. As a share of total students, eligibility more that doubled. In the
1992/93 school year, 23% of all students were eligible for the free or reduced lunch program.
(Source: School Lunch Program, Richfield School District)
3
Census Block Group Namcs in Richfield
0241.00:4 0241.00:5 `~'
02 1
00:1 0244.00:3
247.00:5
0247.00:1 ~
0 49.01:2
.
0244.00:2 0249.01:1
c
0241.00:3
0241.00:2
0244.00:1
242
00:4 0247.00:2 0249.02:3
.
0242.00:1
J247.00:4
249
02:1
02 2.00:5 r+ 0245.00:1 ~ 0247.00:3 .
0245.00:2 c
0242.00:2
0242
00:3 N 0249.02:2
. ~ 0248.01:1
248
01:3
.
0243.00:3 0248.01:2
0243
00:1 I M
.
0246.00:3
0246. 0246.00:1
00:4
0248
02:1 ° r.
~ c
245.02:3 . o v
0243
00:2 ~ ~
. - 0248.02:2
0246.00:2
Block Groups
Tracts
Federal Poverty Guideline
Famil Size
1 person
2 people
3 people
4 people
5 people
Poverty Line
$6,310
$8,076
$9,885
$12,674
$14,990
The poverty line is argued to be too low because it is based on estimates of families' basic needs in
1963. Income is adjusted for inflation, but not in changes in work norms, lifestyles and family structures,
all of which impact basic needs. Child care for example would be considered a basic need today that was
not in 1963. It is estimated that the poverty line today would have to be about 50 percent higher to be
comparable, in terms of minimum consumption needs, to the standard set in 1963 (Ruggles, 1990).
_ _.__ Free and reduced lunch i
Free Lunch Income Guidelines
1992
Family Monthly Equivalent household
Size household hourly wage at a
'n
ncome eligibility guidelines in 1992
Reduced Lunch Income Guidelines Federal Poverty
1992 Guidelines 1992
Monthly Equivalent household Monthly household
household hourly wage at a income
i come full-time lob income full-time job
1 $738
$4.27 $1,050 $6.07 $567
2 996 6 1417 8 766
3 1254
7 1784 10 g~
4 1512 9 2151 12 1413
5 1770 10 2518 15 1361
4
BARRIERS TO OVERCOMING POVERTY
In 1993, Richfield HRA helped fund a survey of "Family Needs of Low Income Tenants in
Bloomington and Richfield." Some of the barriers keeping these families from becoming
economically self sufficient are: lack of affordable child care, lack of transportation, lack of
skills, don't know what to do, lack of confidence, don't know how to apply or not motivated.
The following graph indicates, of those surveyed, the percentage of householders for whom
barrier is a "big obstacle."
Lack of affordable child care
Lack of transportation
Lack of skills i
Don't know what to do ~~
Lack of time 1/1/hite
householder
Lack of confidence ® (n=114)
Don't know how to apply ~
Not motivated
Lack of affordable child care
Lack of transportation
Lack of skills
Don't know what to do
Lack of time :Minority
householder
Lack of confidence ~ (n=60)
Don't know how to apply
Not motivated
Percent of householders
BARRIERS TO OVERCOMING POVERTY
South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency (SHRPA) research indicates there are plenty of
services "out there" for people to take advantage of but individuals have difficulty accessing the
services they need. SHRPA recognizes that the complaint of many people needing services is
that the individual does not know of the services available or does not seek the appropriate
service.
Individuals need professional assistance sorting out their needs and connecting them to
appropriate resources. Individuals facing multiple issues (mental health, lack of education, lack
of transportation, lack of affordable child care, etc.) often feel overwhelmed by their situation
and need a professional to help them "sort out" their issues and match their needs to services
they are qualified to receive.
The following example may be helpful to gain further insight into the complexity of multiple
issues facing some individuals. "Deanna and her two year old son were abandoned by her
husband shortly after moving to the Twin Cities. They were left with few possessions, little
money and no support system. Added to this, Deanna was raped less than a month after her
husband left her.
Deanna turned to a program like "Together We Can" that connects people to available resources
in the community. Deanna got the help she needed. The Coordinator assessed what she needed
and linked her to the resources she was qualified to receive. The Coordinator followed up with
her to make sure she was receiving the kind of care and assistance she needed. One of the
resources the Coordinator connected her to was a counselor who helped her sort through the
deep emotional wounds from being raped and from being abandoned by her husband. She was
also referred to a career counselor and was connected to affordable child care. Deanna decided
she wanted to go back to school and get a 2-year degree. Deanna applied for, and received
scholarships to finance her degree. After completing her degree, she got afull-time job helping
others faced with multiple issues, connect to resources in the community. Deanna provides
referrals, encouragement and a listening ear to individuals seeking to become economically self
sufficient.
Deanna's self-confidence and pride in her accomplishments is evident as she tells her story but
she adds, "I don't know where I'd be today if it wasn't for the help and support of that
Coordinator who matched my needs to the services I was qualified to receive, at a very critical
time in my life."
6
ROLE OF THE COORDINATOR
The primary role of the Coordinator for "Together We Can" would be to assist individuals clarify
and prioritize their needs and link them to various social services.
SERVICES
An individual first coming to the Coordinator of "Together We Can" would:
STEP 1
Have an initial interview
with the Coordinator. The
Coordinator would assess
needs of individual and provide
referrals for the individual.
Some referrals may be for
counseling, health care,
educational and career
counseling, child care, job
search support groups,
parenting skills, etc.
STEP 3
The Coordinator meets with the
individual and helps the individual
define their goals and the necessary
steps for becoming self sufficient.
STEP 2
The coordinator would follow-up
with the individual to see if the
referral was sufficient or if other
referrals are necessary.
STEP 4
The Coordinator "tracks" the
individual's progress and invites the
individual to participate in a job
support group or educational
support group that are offered at
"Together We Can."
7
STAFFING RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the funding agency contract with an established human service agency to
provide the necessary services of a full-time coordinator.
Coordinator, full time
Responsible for:
• Providing assessments, referrals and "tracking" of individuals served by "Together We Can."
• Initiating cooperation, coordination and/or collaboration with other service providers to best
serve participants effectively and efficiently.
• Recruiting, screening and training volunteers.
• Providing volunteers, job descriptions, support, supervision and recognition.
• Making the services of "Together We Can" known.
• Providing and updating resource information.
• Providing evaluation of the program components.
• Designing and overseeing program improvements.
• Overseeing budget.
• Seeking alternative funding resources. Writing grant proposals to Foundations, etc.
• Providing necessary reports to the Human Service Planning Council and to the Community
Apartment Program.
• Updating RAMA on the progress of the program.
• Serving as human resource person for RAMA by providing resource information, materials, and
suggestions to managers assisting residents needing referral information.
• Providing necessary reports to funding agency.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
To ensure stability for this program, it is recommended the funding agency provide funds for
these core requirements of the program fora "pilot period" of one year.
Proposed Budget For Year 1995 - 1996
Account description Budget
Salary/Benefits (coordinator) $38,000
Rental of Sage Apartment for "Together We Can" 5,400
Center ($450/month) Possible "in kind" contribution
Development (professional training) 500
Mileage 1,000
"Start-up" expenses 2,600
[computer and printer 1700
copier 600
used tables and chairs 300
used office desk and chair
(from existing inventory)]
Telephone ($50/month) 600
Electric ($40/month) 480
General office supplies 1,000
Postage 1,000
Participant incentives/recognition 500
Emergency assistance (bus pass, car repair) 2,500
Miscellaneous 500
*5 80 0
Less possible "in kind" contribution - 5,400
48,680
8
Marketing Plan
for
"Together We Can"
• Product
• Publics
• Place
• Production
• Promotion
Product
Mission
"Together We Can" helps individuals overcome barriers to self sufficiency by providing
information about existing resources and by offering support services designed to assist
individuals become economically self sufficient.
Goals
• To provide individual referrals to existing resources.
• To provide emotional support to participants.
• To provide timely information to participants.
Publics
Primary Publics Desired perception/opinion of
"Together We Can"
Participant Coordinator and volunteers are Accessible;
Responsive; Respectful; Welcoming;
Empowering; Supportive
Other Service Agencies Facilitates in cooperation, coordination, and
collaboration among service providers.
Volunteers Organization that values training,
encouragement and appreciation of volunteers.
Businesses, Organizations, Professional service that takes initiative in
and Foundations exploring ways individuals, businesses,
organizations, and foundations can participate
or support the work of "Together We Can."
9
Place and Hours of Operation
• Sage Apartments. Hours accessible to participants.
Production
• Able to meet demand for services.
Promotion
Brochures
• Simple. Designed to motivate person to call or drop in.
Atmosphere and Attitude
• Coordinator and/or volunteer; pleasant, courteous, helpful, glad the individual called
or came to The Center.
Word of Mouth
• Earned by fulfilling mission and having a good relationship with publics. Publics feel
informed, enthusiastic and willing to let others know about "Together We Can."
Information FRir
• Designed to make contact with potential participants and/or volunteers.
Networking
• With social service providers, business leaders, and institutional leaders.
Feature Story
• In newsletters and/or newspaper publics will read.
Public Speaking
• To inform and inspire publics.
10
EVALUATION
• Evaluation materials will need to be designed that are simple, easy to administer and
reflect the program mission and goals.
• Evaluation materials will be needed for participants, and for volunteers. Evaluation must
be tailored for appropriate group and for the stage of development of the program.
• Evaluation needs to contain measurable data such as the number of individuals using
the support services and referral services of The Center. Measurable data can include the
number of participants who are working on completing educational or skill building
goals, as well as the number of participants who are making progress toward obtaining
employment at a livable wage. Their progress might mean to obtain volunteer work to
build self confidence and skills, or obtaining part-time or full-time employment while
continuing to build additional skills.
• Evaluation needs to contain measurable data related to improving the quality of life for
participants. This data may include information such as; the number and type of public
safety calls, the amount of property damage, test results for individuals receiving tutoring,
etc.
• Evaluation needs to include all the components of the program. The components
(coordinator, volunteers, marketing, etc.) need to be working well together to achieve
the best possible results of this program.
• Evaluation of both the results, and the components of the program will provide valuable
insights for future strategic planning and for carrying out a commitment for continued
program improvements.
11
EVALUATION
• Evaluation materials will need to be designed that are simple, easy to administer and
reflect the program mission and goals.
• Evaluation materials will be needed for participants, and for volunteers. Evaluation must
be tailored for appropriate group and for the stage of development of the program.
• Evaluation needs to contain measurable data such as the number of individuals using
the support services and referral services of The Center. Measurable data can include the
number of participants who are working on completing educational or skill building
goals, as well as the number of participants who are making progress toward obtaining
employment at a livable wage. Their progress might mean to obtain volunteer work to
build self confidence and skills, or obtaining part-time or full-time employment while
continuing to build additional skills.
• Evaluation needs to include all the components of the program. The components
(coordinator, volunteers, marketing, etc.) need to be working well together to achieve
the best possible results of this program.
• Evaluation of both the results, and the components of the program will provide valuable
insights for future strategic planning and for carrying out a commitment for continued
program improvements.
11
Organizational Chart
for
"Together We Can"
Funding Agency
/ Receives
quarterly reports
coordinator.
Human Service
Planning Council
Oversees \
policies and
evaluates
"Together We
Can" program.
Contracting
Agency
Provides coordinator and
supervision of "Together
We Can" program.
= Reporting
- - - - - =Coordinating
Community Apartment
Program (CAP)
Reviews
"Together We
Can" program
in conjunction
with other CAP
programs.
12
TIMELINE*
NOVEMBER Presentation of proposal to City Council and HRA.
If the proposal is accepted then:
• Begin selection process of a social service provider.
JANUARY Select a social service provider that will provide coordinator.
AND Begin "Together We Can" program.
FEBRUARY Move into facility.
• Set up center.
• Contact various service providers that will serve needs of the participants.
• Begin recruitment, training and screening of volunteers.
• Have initial contact with individuals living at Sage Apartments and make
services of "Together We Can" known to them.
• Begin offering interested residents referral services and job search support
groups for those seeking economic self sufficiency.
MARCH Normal programming.
APRIL Provide first quarterly report to HRA regarding the progress of program.
• Evaluate program components and make necessary adjustments.
MAY Normal programming.
• Evaluate program components and make necessary adjustments.
JUNE Normal programming.
JULY • Quarterly report to HRA.
AUGUST Normal programming.
SEPTEMBER Normal programming.
OCTOBER Quarterly report to HRA.
NOVEMBER Normal programming.
DECEMBER Normal programming.
JANUARY Report to HRA on the progress of "Together We Can". Consideration will be
given to recommendations regarding continuance of program.
* Timeline may need to be adjusted depending on starting date of coordinator.
13
L ~
cn ~ Q vi /~
i ~-' >. ~ b..0
N
~ N +-~ N ~
-~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f, Q ~ ~
c~3 N
L ~ ~ O ~ O ;:
:'~ ~ _~ ~ C ~ d.
N v
w
w ~ ~-
A ~°~~
w ~~
-~ .
-V C
~ Q o c ~ U -~
~ p -a U ~ N ~ .-. N ^ ~ ~ N
--~ c _~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ N N
~ oo _ ^
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ -u ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ N p ~ z ~ ~
s ~ ~ ' L N N ~ N _ v~ = J ~ ~ L i ^ ~ ~ ~ LA ~A
+' L ~ a~ -~ ao ~ a~ O ~- ~ ~ cd ^ ~ M M
-c ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ w o o° ~ ~ 0 0 0 °' ~ ~ U ~' Y ^ ~ ~ a~ ~ N N
~ ~ u D O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L -a -a u 3 ~ 3 U -a m ~ O ~ ~
~ v O L O ~ L N N c~ O O ~ L ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L.L
Q cn m m U~ w ~~_= Z Z cn Z~~ U ~ ~ ~~ m
wog - ~ w
^
. p
~ _
~' °~ °J
T/1 a~ o ~' E -~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ao ~o ~ E
~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ -- V ~' C V ~
~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ vi cd ~' u ~ W C C N t~ O ~C ~ vi - ~ O
~ ~ c V ~ ~ = ~ ~ a:o ~ c ~ +, V ~ c
r^I o`-~ ~a> ~~-- ~~ p ~-x ~ o,s, O`er- Qc _,_, -~ ~ b.o~-o
c~ O -~ ~ ~,o O ao~
~ O ~ ~ ~ a~ m ~ ~ aA ~ o ~ t', E ~ o ~ ~-' c E ~ Sri ~ ~ U _ ~ °~'
~ w m ~-~ 0 3 c c E a. m O °~ a~ oo °°~~ M w cn ~ °V' o
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. 69
Agenda November 20, 1995
Issue Statement:
Discussion by representatives of Housing Services Incorporated of their housing
concept for the American Legion site and status of the selection of a facility planner for
a jointly used American Legion and VFW Post.
Background:
Approximately one year ago, Mr. Lou Stocco and Mr. Mike Conlan of Housing Services
Incorporated presented to the leadership of the American Legion a proposal to
purchase and redevelop the Legion site with asenior co-operative housing project.
This offer is still "on the table." Mr. Stocco and Mr. Conlan will be at the November 20
HRA meeting to present their concept.
This proposal has provided the impetus for the VFW and American Legion to begin to
explore the joint development and use of a combined facility. Staff has also joined the
discussions. Both groups are dealing with the same issues; outdated facilities, which
are expensive to operate and declining membership.
The American Legion and VFW have made significant contributions to Richfield. They
continue to .have a valuable role in community life and a joint facility would help make
that possible. Through weekly meetings with the leadership of both organizations it
became. apparent that the key to moving forward was the retention of a consultant who
would help determine the appropriate size and design of a new facility (parking,
restaurant, banquet and bar).
On October 26 representatives of several organizations who plan and design this type
of facility attended a meeting to hear a presentation of need. Representatives included:
• MN Hospitality Training Center
• Connoisseur Restaurant Management
• Shea Architects
• McMonigal Architects
• The Beard Group
Three proposals were received by the November 9 deadline:
• Shea Architects
• Maxfield Research Group teamed with McMonigal Architects
• Connoisseur Restaurant Management
On November 15, staff and VFW /Legion representatives interviewed the applicants.
The interview panel is now evaluating the results of the interviews and a
recommendation will be presented to the HRA in December before hiring a consultant.
Recommended Motion:
Listen to the presentation by Housing Services Inc. and discuss the concept.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. There is a need in Richfield for more housing options especially those targeted at
empty nesters and the retired.
2. The VFW and American Legion are incurring the expense of operating an outdated
and declining membership.
3. These organizations have benefited the community in a variety of ways.
4. The continued existence of these organizations is important to community life.
5. The relocation of both organization to a new facility would help assure their viability.
6. There is need for professional assistance to evaluate the size, design and location
of a new facility.
7. Funds are available from the HRA General Fund.
8. With almost 600 opinion. cards returned by members of the VFW and Legion, the
favorable response rate is at about 12 to 1.
Alternative Recommendation:
Direct staff to look at other options.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The process has gained a momentum which needs to continue.
Respectfu ly submitted,
Jame Prosser
Executive Director
JDP:cak