4-3-95 agenda•
CITY OF RICHFIELD
MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1995
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
1. 7:00-7:15 P.M. PRESENTATION OF ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1994
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 9
II. 7:15-7:30 P.M. DISCUSSION OF BOARD OF REVIEW PROCEDURES
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 10
III. 7:30-7:45 P.M. DISCUSSION OF POLICY AND STRATEGY
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AIRPORT RELATED
ISSUES
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 11
IV. 7:45-8:15 P.M. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES IN CITY
OF RICHFIELD
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 12
V. 8:15-8:30 P.M. DISCUSSION OF UPDATE OF RICHFIELD WATER
SYSTEM
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 13
VI. 8:30-8:45 P.M. DISCUSSION OF SUPPORT FOR NINE MILE CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT'S SURFACE WATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 14
VII. 8:45-9:00 P.M. DISCUSSION OF AUTOMOBILE REIMBURSEMENT
ALLOWANCE
STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 15
• 9:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT
AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE UPON
REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO
THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702.
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 15
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Council discussion and staff direction on adjusting mileage and automobile
reimbursement allowances.
Background:
In 1979, the City elected to reduce its City-owned fleet of cars which were provided to
certain employees. As this occurred, these employees were compensated as follows:
• City Manager and Public Safety Director were provided automobiles.
• Other Department Directors and specific employees whose job responsibility
requires daily extensive use of their vehicle for work duties were provided monthly
car allowances.
• A mileage reimbursement rate was provided to employees who occasionally had to
use their vehicles on City business.
• In 1994, due to a Legislative change, the City Manager could no long have a City-
owned vehicle. The Council authorized up to a $550 per month car allowance.
Currently, the Manager has requested a $350 per month car allowance.
In 1990, the following rates for other employees were authorized:
0 $200 per month for Department Directors and other designated employees.
0 25.5 cents for mileage reimbursement.
No other increases have been made since 1990. The current standard mileage rate
established by the IRS is 30 cents.
Recommended Motion:
Staff is seeking Council discussion and direction on this issue. Staff is recommending:
• An increase of $25 in the monthly automobile allowance.
• An increase of 4.5 cents per mile (to 30 cents per mile) for mileage reimbursement.
In addition, the City Manager and Public Safety Director would be eligible to receive a
car allowance in lieu of a City-owned vehicle in an amount not to exceed the $550 per
month previously approved by the Council.
In the future, reimbursement rates will be reviewed as part of the annual budget
process.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. No adjustments have been made to these allowances for five years.
2. The IRS has raised the mileage rate to 30 cents per mile, and the City rate is still at
25.5 cents per mile.
3. The proposed new reimbursement rates are competitive with those paid by other
cities.
4. If an adjustment is authorized, each Department. would be required to absorb the
increase within their current funding levels.
5. It is less costly for the City to provide car allowances rather than furnishing cars due
to insurance, fuel, maintenance and, of course, the cost of the vehicle.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council may decide to maintain the current automobile reimbursement rates.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is being placed on the April 3 Study Session for Council discussion. Staff is
seeking Council direction on how to implement changes in these allowances now and in
the future.
I1* submitted,
Jamogp. Prosser.
City nager
JDP:cak
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Memorandum
DATE: March 15, 1995
TO: Bridget Walstrom, Finance Manager
FROM: James D. Prosser, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1995 Car Allowance Payments
The following City employees should be paid a $200 monthly car allowance, payable
the first pay period of each month during 1995.
Gretchen Blank, Leisure Services Coordinator
Steven Devich, Administrative Services Director
Michael Eastling, City Engineer
Donald Fondrick, Community Services Director
William Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director
Randy Hughes, Operations Coordinator
Dennis Neudecker, Chief Building Inspector
Roger Spencer, Maintenance Superintendent
John Thom, Utility Superintendent
Byron Wallace, Community Development Director
David Rahn, Housing Inspector
David Scherbel, Housing Inspector I (employed March 6, 1995; to receive 1/2
month payment for March)
Jim Prosser, City Manager ($350/month)
JDP:cak
Copy: Department Directors
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 14
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Support for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's Surface Water Management Plan.
Background:
Through the years the Board of Managers of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
have relied heavily on the cities within the District to provide the technical and political
support to accomplish their surface water management goals. The District's Surface
Water Management Plan (Plan) is consistent with these past practices. The Board of
Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) review of the Plan (BWSR has approval authority)
questions this reliance on cities and suggests that the District take a stronger role.
District Managers, through a letter from the District's attorney, are asking for city
support of the present Plan. This support can take three forms:
1. Pass a resolution in support of their Plan at the April 10, 1995 City Council Meeting.
2. Designate a City Council Member to attend the April 5, 1995 meeting of the District
Managers and BWSR members (or City staff if no Council Member is available).
is 3. Send a letter of support signed by the Mayor.
The specific issues that the District and BWSR are discussing:
1. District reliance on petitions from cities to initiate District funded projects.
2. District intention to rely on guidelines and best management practices previously
published by State agencies and departments rather than promulgating unique and
free-standing rules and ordinances special to the District thus allowing flexibility at
the City level.
Recommended Motion:
Although a Study Session, Council may choose to give strong direction in preparation
for the April 5 meeting of the Nine Mile Creek District managers and BWSR by agreeing
to send a member of the Council to the April 5 meeting.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The practice of past years for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to rely on
cities has worked well.
• 2. The District has prepared a Surface Water Management Plan consistent with these
past practices.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Send a letter of support signed by the Mayor.
2. Provide continued support of the past Nine Mile Creek Watershed District practice to
rely on cities by scheduling action to consider a resolution at the April 10 Council
meeting.
3. Do all of the recommended actions.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is on the April 3 Study Session agenda. Direction from Council should be
clear at this time especially if there is to be personal attendance and/or a letter
submitted at the April 5 meeting of Nine Mile Creek Watershed District managers and
the Board of Water and Soil Resources.
ubmitted,
RespeY.Pros-ser
James City Manager
0 JDP:ds
•
• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 13
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Update on Richfield water system.
Background:
The Council met at and toured the Water Plant, 6221 Portland Avenue, for the February
6, 1995 Study Session. Status of the Water Plant renovation was discussed at that
time. A report which included an analysis from Camp Dresser & McKee, water
consultants, was part of the discussion as were factors related to taste, color and odor
Richfield's water.
Council requested periodic discussions and updates related to Richfield's water.
Weekly information is provided in the Status and Information report. Continued
discussion at this Study Session is also part of the requested updating.
Recommended Motion:
This item is provided for informational purposes only.
10 Basis of Recommendation:
Does not apply.
Alternative Recommendation:
Does not apply.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This item is scheduled for 7 p.m. on April 3, 1995.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame. Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 12
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Discussion of public safety issues in the City of Richfield.
Background:
Public Safety Director Jack Erskine will review public safety issues and new initiatives
to address areas of concern.
Recommended Motion:
This discussion is for the benefit of the Council so that they are better informed when
responding to their constituents.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Public safety issues are a high priority concern for the City of Richfield.
2. The Council will become informed of the Public Safety Department's response to
these concerns.
Alternative Recommendation:
None.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Public safety concerns are presented for Council discussion at the April 3 Study
Session.
Respectf submitted,
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
•
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 11
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Policy and strategy recommendations for airport related issues.
Background:
Recent developments regarding airport issues include the following:
• New Ford Town and Rich Acres Acquisition
Phase II is progressing as Phase I is being completed. There are three residents from
the first phase who have not gone through closing procedures. As of March 21,
fourteen residents have yet to relocate. There are four owners in Phase II that will not
acknowledge receipt of W.D. Schock and MAC correspondences. These owners have
been notified that they will be deferred to a later phase unless an immediate response
is received. MAC is expecting to receive a grant from the FAA by the end of March for
over $8 million. Matching funds are expected to provide enough money to finish
acquiring all single-family residential units.
A third auction was held in March with 43 of the 50 homes available being sold. The
. auctions have netted,approximately $500,000 in additional project funds, including a
savings of roughly $300,000 in demolition costs. Several movers have requested
permission to store beams and other equipment somewhere in the City, as well as
temporary holding lot space for homes in transit. Both requests have been denied for
reasons of liability and unsightliness. Home buyers from the latest auction will also be
receiving a letter notifying them that some movers have not fully complied with the
requirement to leave properties in their natural state by depositing excessive amounts
of fill dirt in the streets. In the event of future incidents, the Community Services
Department will sweep the streets and bill the home buyer for a minimum of two hours,
at $40 per hour.
4-22 Extension
There has been no word on an expected date of release for the FAA Record of
Decision or the state approval from MnDOT. Staff met with Charles Dayton from the
law firm of Leonard, Street and Deinard. Dayton is an experienced and respected
environmental litigator, and will assist Steven Pflaum as local counsel if litigation is
pursued. Mr. Pflaum sent a letter to the Bloomington City Attorney, David Orenstein,
updating him on the purpose of a legal challenge and expected litigation strategy.
Since Bloomington's City Council has endorsed a potential lawsuit, Mr. Pflaum detailed
several alternatives for their participation as discussed previously by the Richfield City
Council. A copy of Bloomington's airport policies is attached.
• MASAC
The regular monthly meeting was held on Tuesday, March 28, 1995. The Council
voted 16-5 to.approve the New Noise Management Methodology (NNMM). The NNMM
will be forwarded to the MAC Planning & Environment Committee. NNMM is a
monitoring tool to track air carriers participation in voluntary noise reduction programs at
MSP. The previous monitoring report, ADNE, expired in 1992 and was a completely
unintelligible document for most people. The goals of NNMM are to ensure that carriers
are complying with Stage 3 aircraft in-phasing, restrict nighttime departures and arrivals
(11 p.m. - 6 a.m.), provide flight crew training to reduce noise impacts, and require all
carries to be fully Stage 3 integrated by December 31, 1999 (as required by federal
law).
NNMM is not an enforcement program. It is, however, the beginning of what the
MASAC Operations Committee hopes to be far reaching cooperation and compliance
among MSP's users and communities. The Operations Committee is planning to
address the "shoulder hours" of 10 p.m. - 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. - 7 a.m. in the near future.
Operations Committee members, as well as representatives of several airlines and the
Airline Pilots Association, argued that this is a significant step forward because it is a
major concession on the part of carriers. Minneapolis, Mendota Heights and Inver
Grove Heights objected that the NNMM contained no enforcement mechanism and was
not aggressive enough.
MASAC members were treated to an informational briefing on the usefulness of Global
Positioning System (GPS) technology applied to aviation. MSP will be the first airport in
the nation to receive the instrumentation for the initial integration. GPS allows air traffic
controllers and pilots to pinpoint their location within 22 centimeters, which far exceeds
the ILS range of 4 degrees. GPS not only allows for operations in any conditions, it
actually pilots the plane by selecting turning points and glide slopes. FAA would like to
have GPS fully integrated into the national system by 1998. Amazingly, GPS ground
systems cost about $600,000 less than ILS ground systems. MAC's John Foggia
describes it as the single greatest aviation innovation since the jet engine.
Dual Track Planning Process
MAC authorized spending $50,000 to analyze the Remote Runway Concept. The study
is not officially included as part of the Dual Track Airport Planning Process. As reported
last month, Rep. Dee Long had sponsored a bill to include the concept in the Dual
Track. However, it is expected that she will rescind the bill since MAC has authorized
the study.
• Congressional Update
Staff continues to monitor congressional actions. At the MASAC meeting on March 7,
MAC Executive Director Jeff Hamiel reported on a wide range of airport topics. Future
federal funding is a major concern due to the new congressional leadership. He also
reported that Commissioner John Himle is urging MAC to divorce themselves from
federal funds. Himle is strongly opposed to trust funds, such as the Aviation Trust
Fund, and wants MAC to show others around the country that airports are viable
independent entities. To date, no movement has been made by Congress on the
Department of Transportation structure or the Aviation Trust Fund.
• Part 150 Sound Insulation Program
Sound proofing continues to progress through northeast Richfield. MAC has developed
a new prioritization map, complete with individual block prioritization and Ldn Noise
Contours. Priorities 1-6 were completed in 1993 and 1994. Priorities 7-21 are
expected to be entered into the process during 1995. Considering there are many
residents who choose not to participate for various reasons, it is possible the project
may reach priorities 22-24. Resident inquiries regarding sound proofing continue to be
high (see attachment).
Recommended Motion:
Discuss current airport policy issues.
Basis of Recommendation:
It is important for the Council to provide direction to staff on airport policy.
Alternative Recommendation:
Defer discussion to another date.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This matter will be discussed at the Study Session of April 3, 1995.
Respectf y submitted,
Jame , . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:cak
Attachment
11
?J
•
Resident Contact:
Sound Proofing & Airport Concerns
c . X.x
...........................................
.................................................
.................................................
..............................................
::: •.: ::::::..::::::.:::::::. :.::::::::::::..:::::::::::::::::. :::: :.
Noise after 1 p.m. Question answered.
Tues., Feb. 28 70th & Oakland has increased in last MAC'S noise
3 months. Can they complaint phone #
be sound roofed? given.
She was insulated in Staff contacted CEE.
Tues., Feb. 28 6332 18th Avenue Dec. 93 and has They have several
really bad window
CEE
i other cases like this.
i
t
E
i
condensat
on.
' xpert com
n
o
ng
hasn
t helped her. look at windows.
Where is sound uestion answere .
Wed., Mar. 1 No name given. 7500 16th Avenue proofing being
done? What's hap- 4-22 issue explained.
No follow-up
enin with 4-224. requested.
How is sour Question answered.
Fri., Mar. 3 6400 17th Avenue proofing going? Resident is among
When will he be 1995 priority.
included?
How will 4-22 a ect 4-2 impacts
Mar. 3
Fri. 6825 Garfield him? Can he get a explained. Map of
, map of noise contour, flight paths
impacts? & runway use
figures sent to him.
ow is soun Q uestion answered.
Tues., Mar. 7 6300 15th Avenue proofing coming?
ll b
l No follow-up
t
d
e
What exact
y wi e
.
reques
done to his home?
When is he being Question answered.
Mar. 7
Tues. 6338 16th Avenue insulated? How can Will find out why
, people on Blmtgn B . gm is higher
Ave be higher priority on contour
priori than him? ma than 16th.
Is her house eligible Question answered.
Mar. 8
Wed. 7000 block of 17th. for sound insulation No follow-up
, program? requested.
Why is everyone Question answered.
Mar. 8
Wed. 6344 16th Avenue around them being Neighbor of Mar. 7
, insulated first? caller. Explained
l
f
d
When will they be e
or
sche
u
done? insulation program.
Unsatisfied wi Exp Fine selection
Thur., Mar. 9 6344 16th Avenue answer day before. process and
d
R
f
h
d
l
Who decides erre
e
e
u
e.
sc
addresses to be him to MAC for
included? further info.
What is appening Question answered.
ll
N
f
Mar. 13
Mon. 7435 Bloomington with sound ow-up
o
o
, roofm ? requested.
at is a south
W Runway 4-22 issue
Mon., Mar. 13 7515 16th Avenue Richfield sound
proofing schedule? explained. No
follow-up requested.
Is her house a igi a Question answered.
N
i
d
l
4
22
Mar. 13
Mon 6401 11th Avenue for sound proofing? o
ne
.
exp
a
-
., follow-up requested.
Why was neighbor Schedule explained.
Mon., Mar. 13 63 10 Bloomington invited to CEE Will be included in
session and she was next seminar.
not? Referred to CEE.
•
She state that sound Insulation explained
Tues., Mar. 14 No name given. 68th & Oakland proofing is not an as voluntary. 4-22
answer to airport issue explained.
noise. Everyone MASAC explained.
should share the No follow-up
noise. City should requested.
not o ose 4-22.
When is her house Question answered.
Tues., Mar. 14 6412 15th Avenue being insulated?
Th
h
i
hi Priority 30, probably
l
9
oug
t
t was t
s ate 1
96. No
ear? follow-up requested.
What is the schedule 4-22 issue explained.
Wed., Mar. 15 No name given. 7600 block of 15th for south Richfield No follow-up
sound proofing? requested.
What is the schedule Question answered.
Wed., Mar. 15 6332 14th Avenue of 1995? Are they Priority 20 is
included? included in 1995.
Is is house goin g to uesrion answered.
Wed., Mar. 15 No name given. 6438 17th Avenue be sound proofed He is ppriority 24,
this ear? robabl earl `96.
When is is house Question answered.
Wed., Mar. 15 6533 17th Avenue getting sound No follow-up
proofed? Can he requested.
move u m riori ?
When wi s e be Question answere .
Wed., Mar. 15 No name given. 6345 13th Avenue sound proofed? Was Priority 20. No
told "soon" two follow-up requested.
ears ago.
toppe in to see i uestion answere
Wed., Mar. 15 Non-resident 5617 32nd Avenue there was M Is. by phone message
Minneapolis sound proofing info next day. Referred
at Richfield. to CEE.
How will 4-22 uestions answered.
Mon., Mar. 20 No name given. 6800 block of 14th extension and N/S No follow-up
runway affect him? requested.
Will it affect
property values?
When can he be uestion answered.
Mon., Mar. 20 6438 14th Avenue included in the No follow-up
sound proofing? requested.
7345 12
h A Is her house a iggi e
f
d
f
? Airport question
h
Tues., Mar. 21 t
venue or soun
proo
mg answered. Gave
er
How cans he ether the number for
house painted;. Metro Paint-a-thon.
This information was gathered February 27 - March 24, 1995.*
*Note: Names of residents have been deleted for this report. Council Members wishing to respond directly to a
resident's comment or question may do so by contacting the Media Assistant/Airport Issues at ext. 716.
JDV:ttf
0
J
0
•
City of Bloomington
Airport Policies
On March 6, 1995, the Bloomington City Council unanimously adopted the following 11 airport
policies. These policies are based on an extensive review and public comment process conducted
over a 10-month period.
Airport Location and Improvements
In 1989 the Legislature directed the Metropolitan Airports Commission and Metropolitan Council
to study the capacity and expansion potential of MSP airport compared to a new airport located
south of Hastings. The study will result in a comparative cost and impact report to the legislature
in July 1996. All studies indicate that the MSP airport can be improved to handle even the largest
year 2020 passenger and aircraft operation forecasts.
The airport is responsible for substantial economic benefits for Bloomington residents and
businesses. Analysis by several agencies and consultants agree that passenger emplanements and
aircraft operations at MSP will increase so that MSP will require both runway and terminal
enhancements in the near future.
Location
Improvements
4-22 Extension
Policy 1: MSP should continue as the region's passenger and cargo airport.
Policy 2: Improvements should be made to keep MSP operating safely and
efficiently. Noise mitigation should proceed in conjunction with
operational changes.
Policy 3a: Bloomington encourages prompt implementation of the north-
south runway both as a means for increasing airport capacity and
as a reasonable measure for mitigating noise in cities surrounding
the airport.
Policy 3b: Bloomington has no preference for alternative locations to add
terminal space at MSP.
Policy 4a: Bloomington supports extension of Runway 4-22 by 2,750 feet if
MAC demonstrates that the extension is essential for economic
growth and that noise mitigation has been adequately addressed.
Policy 4b: Bloomington supports use of extended Runway 4-22 for heavy
aircraft or emergency situations where a long runway is needed
and to allow two runway operation and adequate runway length
while 11R29L is being reconstructed.
Policy 4c: Bloomington opposes changing the Runway Use System to
simultaneously use runways 4-22 and 11L29R to redistribute
aircraft flights and noise.
Aircraft Noise and Land Use
Having the airport as a neighbor creates noise and land use conflicts. By the year 2000, jet aircraft
are required to comply with federal stage 3 standards. Stage 3 aircraft have significantly less noise
impact than stage 2 aircraft. In addition, noise insulation and land use compatibility modifications
can reduce aircraft noise nuisance.
Noise Policy 5: Bloomington supports aggressive mitigation of noise impacts to
Mitigation minimize the airport's nuisance effect on residents around the
airport.
Policy 6a: Runway 4-22 noise mitigation should be done by MAC at the
same time as the runway extension.
Policy 6b: Bloomington petitions MAC to approve a runway 4-22 land use
compatibility program consisting of acquisition of 72 occupied
single-family houses, two 2-family houses and one vacant single-
family lot.
Policy 7: North-south runway noise mitigation should be done by MAC at
the same time as the runway construction.
Policy 8: Bloomington will adopt sound insulation codes for new
construction within the LDN60 contour.
Land Use Policy 9: Bloomington will use local controls to the maximum extent
Compatibility possible to achieve and improve land use compatibility with MSP
airport.
Safety
Zones
Policy 10a: Bloomington will develop alternative land use plans that address
potential federal and state safety zones for the north-south
runway.
Policy 10b: MAC and the FAA should accept responsibility for all costs of
implementing runway safety zones.
Policy 10c: Bloomington and MAC should cooperate to define flexible safety
zone performance standards which minimize the impact of
restrictions on developable property.
Policy 11: MAC should acquire the Met Center property as a means to
minimize the total public cost of safety zone protection
0
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. io
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Review of 1995 Board of Review procedures.
Background:
The 1995 Richfield Board of Review is scheduled for Monday, May 1, 1995 at 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. As provided by City
Charter, the Board of Review consists of the Mayor, Council Members and two citizens
appointed by the City Manager with the confirmation by City Council. Mr. Lawrence
Emond and Mr. Glenn Erickson were recently appointed to serve on the 1995 Board of
Review.
The duties and responsibilities of the Board of Review are established by State law. In
general, it is the Board's responsibility to hear appeals by property owners regarding
the estimated market value established by the City Assessor and to determine if market
values should be adjusted. The appeal is to address market values rather than tax
rates or other concerns which property owners may bring up to the Board.
The Richfield property assessment was conducted through a contract with Hennepin
County which is supervised by the Administrative Services Department. Staff works
closely with Hennepin County Property Appraisers to ensure that the local assessment
complies with the provisions of the law.
In order to prepare for the Board of Review meeting scheduled for May 1, 1995 a
review session has been established for April 3, 1995. At that meeting Larry Miller, the
Hennepin County Principal Property Appraiser assigned to Richfield, will present
information pertaining to the 1995 assessment and Board of Review process.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that the Council prepare for the Board of Review with a presentation
from Larry Miller.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. It is important to review significant property appraisal issues prior to the time of the
meeting.
2. It is important for the Board to review their statutory responsibilities prior to the
meeting.
Alternative Recommendation:
None.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
This matter will be presented at the Study Session on April 3, 1995.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam D. Prosser
P
City Manager
JDP:ds
•
n
CITY OF RICHFIELD
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1995
LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW INFORMATION
0
E
4
4 585 Edina 142,654 152,634 179.852 196,486 188,380 189,921 200,868 394 Carver County 99,438 109,824
ANNUAL REV11W `AL PROPERTY TYPES
L 1994 RESIDENTIA
I:`HOME .
°, : E •' .. - a.. = - :
AL'
,
S?
1
am
E
1 (1
gle
S 1
Y?M
Listings Total Dollar Unit Average titaa ,gw '
Processed Volume Sales Sales Price COIL(?OII11I1111111? t0?4'1111QusPy Coapp
1972 33,635 $436,396
177 14
788 $29
510 ?tiVERAISJe/ DRIVES
1973 33,966 ,
489,373,859 ,
15,518 ,
31,536
1974 27.865 500,401,086 14,481 34,555
1975 31,271 585,954,410 15,381 -38,095
1976 34.940 773,837,914 18,476 41,883 AVERAGE MEDIAN
1977 38;879 1,115,698,038 23.271 47,943 January $110,000 $95,600
1978 36,095 1,296,246,066 22,780 57,178
1979 40,007 1,351,465,288 20,466 66,417 February 7
1
4
,700 96.500
1980 37,018
1,340,772,915
18,351
74,069 11
1
,
800
March 94,300
1981 35,580 1,249,787,584 15,675 80,238 April 113,400 98,600
1982 41,465 998,693,468 12,193 82,288 May 111,600 95,900
1983 50,794 1,344,916,756 15.914 84,953 June 114,100 99,700
1984 53,646 1,544,535,531 18,231 85,007 July 117,500 99,700
1985 51,492 1,866,291,153 21,335 87,789 August 116,700 100,400
1986 58,382 2,523,647,113 28,015 90.319 September 118
100 700
99
1987 55,422 2,460,309,115 25,772 95,914 , ,
1988 80,771
3,211,389,403
34,244
93,977 October 115,200 96,600
1989 89,170 3,277,302,913 33,962 96,658 November 115,300 96,500
1990 78.548 3,372,262,409 34,496 98,016 December 121,300 99,200
1991 71,850 3,522,813,135 35,598 99,402
1992 72,730 4,309,040,911 41,944 103,264
1993 70,685 4,300,305,967 39,842 107,569 Figures
are rounded
to
nearest $100 and
$100
1994 63,369 4,733,426,199 42,454 111,806 include all
residential
sales for
RMLS.
r?
•sa :?`"; I4 _ ''s#r ': ^'? .?', .. !'.l" v'a.. ?a[x?
AVERAGE SA
I'?
LES PR ICE BY DI STRI CT= SING LE FAMII,
a • 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
550 Calhoun-Harriet $92,897 $98,682 $112,634 $115,451 $116,029 $121,117 $122,008 1993 1994
551 Cedar Isles-Loring 110,348 122,760 175,545 171,830 219,862 211,267 200,881 Minneapolis
552 North 55,701 53,997 52,825 55,667 53,435 54,181 53,080 300 Calhoun-Isles $153,168 $178.990
301 Camden 57,388 55,026
553 Northeast 61,672 63,045 63,370 63,840 64,645 65,414 66,234 303 Longfellow 69,180 73.246
554 Parkway West 93,530 98,163 100,405 105,461 107,090 109,846 109,588 304 Nokomis 82,748 84.565
555 Parkway Central 77,409 76.851 80,189 83,241 83,712 86,840 88,446 305 North 51,568 43,953
556 Parkway South 63,364 67,130 68,616 66.973 70,761 70,595 70,652 306 Northeast 67,556 65,748
557 South 61,115 61,825 62,317 63,127 63.695 66,944 67,495 307 Phillips 41,253 32,732
558 South Central 52,184 51,587 49,136 49.630 51,220 50,510 48,894 308 Powderhom 63,277 57,002
309 Southwest 118,534 128,723
559 Southeast 73,861 74,314 73,196 78,685 81,215 65,697 79,124 310 University 82,370 83,946
560 St. Paul & Suburban 82,797 110,473 Suburban and other areas
563 Isanti County 56,399 59,830 63,830 66,235 340 Buffalo 97,702 101,236
564 Blaine-Lexington, Circle Pines 73,638 75,052 341 Wright County 85,103 93,406
565 Falcon Heights-Roseville, Arden Hills 105,100 107,244 342 Hutchinson 75,702 79,526
Shoreview -
343 McLeod 65,250
66,646
360 Robbinsdale 77,874 82.274
566 New Brighton-Moundsview, St. Anthony _ 89,812 95,504 98.878 102,486 106,085 361 Crystal 80,323 80,663
567 Coon Rapids-Anoka 75.904 77.887 362 New Hope 93,094 103,443
568 Fridley-Columbia Heights, Spring Lk Pk 73,788 76,404. 363 Brooklyn Center 77,897 78,878
569 Suburban NE 74,165 76.903 364 Brooklyn Park 96,775 105,641
570 Sibley County 79,503 86,176 365 Maple Grove / Osseo 130,387 142.872
571 Brooklyn Center-Park
75,812 77,837
87.606 89,466
89,401
89,104
91,869 366 Champlin 102,558 113,051
367 Hennepin Co North 129,863 136,165
572 Wright/Sherburne Counties 62,232 65,081 69,880 72,120 74,130 77,850 82,442 368 Hennepin Co NW 179,230 178.293
573 Golden Valley/Tyrol Hills 105,237 105.371 114,238 113,613 118,860 119,438 119,699 370 Sibley County 59,000 75,038
574 Plymouth 120,323 126.910 145.748 151,612 153,820 151,483 160,141 373 Golden Valley 128,603 132,215
575 Robbinsdale-Crystal-New Hope 74.433 77.689 80.144 81,266 81,370 81,146 84
468 374 Plymouth 171,532 187,918
576 Dayton-Champlin-Maple Grove-Osseo 85
544 92
627 104
199 106
767 112
030 112
070 ,
115
466 378 Richfield 86,150 92,260
,
. ,
, , , , 379_ Bloomington - East 88,070 94,569
577 Suburban NW 90,579 98,805 107,938 125.869 117,650 148,008 135,817 380 Bloomin
ton - West 157
418 156
131
578 Richfield 76.968 77.274 79,801 81,753 82.847 82,994 85,181 g
,
381 Lake Minnetonka No 238
535 ,
287
306
579 East Bloomington 78,210 79,500 83.435 85,913 86,052 85,943 89,375 ,
382 Lake Minnetonka West 155,471 ,
144,015
580 West Bloomington 109,963 115,103 134,625 133,679 131,377 136,269 144,396 383 Lake Minnetonka So 223,746 262.619
581 Mendota Heights-Eagan, Inver Grove Hts 95,617 105,342 385 Edina 214,290 226,948
582 Burnsville 93,985 101,801 114,829 122,581 123,956 123,590 386 Hopkins 97,882 107,208
387 Minnetonka 168,031 184,818
583 Suburban South 83,261 87,231 • 391 Saint Louis Park 100,584 106,856
684 Apple V.1ley-Rosemount-Lakeville 93,401 103,109 392 Eden Prairie 175,454 206,057
,
587 Hopkins-Minnetonka 112,915 122,772 138,603 150,368 148,849 148,371 154,544 395 Waterfront 85,099 92,295
589 Lake Minnetonka 133,215 158,729 172,208 180,700 178,719 171,361 190,743 396 Chanhassen 164,240 182,828
591 SL Louis Park 79,091 79,587 90,582 90,369 91,206 93,633 94,582 397 Chaska 126,421 132,502
398 Victoria 174,270 207,068
592 Eden Prairie 116,734 126,632 148,971 163,400 167,836 157,322 168,219 399 Out of Town 94,807 73,861
593 Eastern Carver County 80,402 89,643 112,418 120,318 130,022 129,359 141,155
12 • February 1995
¦ 2,---
Og---
n
0
a
Z
=!
D w. &ntl I; 31w ?1-
?; s
??j?"I ntnt
-- 3??
3c l
3nv
5 1( -3nv ANON)!
¦ 1091----
I ---g
_ i c e
v e i s
c
\` j C
I
^` W I ~
nt rv03J
!?^
c1c
00 -
C9
' f1J
W E.
1. I
J 1
UJ Z
?) r.U
W3M Z
Nr I I ? v
k
t: V
%ON% w
Y
O
,I
X?
Ln
m
?o
a
•
N
IL
y
y
r?
O?
\ O
Ol O`
O
1 M
Pr) =
\ H
O
r•t
W
y U
W H
J >
y W
y
J
H O
t- H
Z F-
W cT
H w
y o
w U.
H
O
J 2
W H
H d
U- ui
V Z
H W
w 2
N
U +
C 1
m ?
L 7K 1
L 7K >K .?
7 ,
U 7K 1K 1
U 1K >K * t
* * * + O
O 1K >K 1K 1 ?
?1 * * )K 1
1K * * 1
r? )K •• >K t
1K >K >K 1
' A * * >K * 1
ri >K 1K >K * 1
Cfl 1K k( * * !K 1
tiD
K >K * 1K )K * * 1 U
X 7K 1K 7K 7K 7K 1K 1 C
L * 7K )K 7K 1K ?i 7
0.
* * * >K * t a o
CL
* * * 1 m
t6 * * >K * )K * 1 L
7K )K * * )K >K + O Y•
N >K >K )K * * * 1 M
f0 1K tK 1K )K * * 1
7 7K * * 7K 1K * * t L N
17 >K >K * >K * * * + O! m
r? * >K * * )K ? )K * 1 N U
O 1K 1K >K * >K * ? * 1 .r{
.a 7K * * 7K 7K + Ln 2 m
E * >K * >K * >K >K * 1 e-t c
? 1K W. >K * * * >K * * i .r{
N * 7k W. 1K 7K W, 1K * 1K * 1 N
7K 1K 1K 1K 1K 1K >K * * * ? 1 _ N
1K 1K tK IK >K * ? * W. 7K .? ? * * 7K •• 7K M.' 1
H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H. H H H+ O
•1+ M0%%7CD %Dr{??Mas o%DrINhl)a, o%Dr•1?.
C %T N P-4 C COD N Ltd %T N r•t O CD N in r N r-I co 0 N m M
.rl
O r•I ?t /? C; N Lg 0p rl ?T V? C; N Lq-CO r 1 ?7 h o N U1 C0
Q hr.NOD 00CD OD 0%01V?00oor-4P4"tNNNN
? 1•?1 r•l ri ri ri ri r? H ri ri ri
•rt
S
N
NO
V
J
Q
E-
z
LLJ
0
CO
t1J
W
Z
U
r
-- M
i j Cj
I
o
! N
N
O
ni
`O
LO
i0
M
O
c+?
0
N
r
i
j .
r
f
O
N
i ?
N
co
O
LO
0)
rn
M
0)
NV
0
rn
O
co
co
co
cc)
_ Q
Ow
co
}
00
1}'
00
(Y)
.00
N
co
r
00
0
00
O
ti
O
ti
to O LO O LO O LO
N N V-
1N3ON3d
•
SUBJECT PROPERTY
Address XXXX XX Avenue South
PID XX-028-24-41-0010
St
Hei
ht One h
B 1
ory
g at
s
1st Floor Area 1042 sq. ft. Baths 1 in basement
Gross Building Area 1042 sq. ft. Finished Basement 500 sq. ft.
Year Built 1952 Walkout No
Condition Average Fireplace No
1st Floor Rooms Kitchen, living Air Conditioning Yes
room, 3 bedrooms Garage Single attached
2nd Floor Rooms 0 Porches/Deck None
Bedrooms Lot Size 75x133
Comments: Property sold 12/91 for $81,000
. , 1994 Example -
GRID - COMPARABLE DATA
APPLICANT'S NAME:
ADDRESS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
P.I.D. #:
MUNIC:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX XX Avenue South
XXXX XX Avenue South
XX-028-24-41-0010
Richfield
•
BUILDING TYPE:
STORY HEIGHT:
1ST FLOOR AREA:
GROSS BLDG. AREA:
YR. OF CONST.:
CONDITION:
1ST FL. ROOMS:
2ND FL. ROOMS:
BEDROOMS:
BATHS:
HALF BATHS:
FIN. BSMT. SQ.FT.:
WALKOUT:
FIREPLACE:
AIR COND:
GARAGE AREA:
PORCH AREA:
DECK:
LOT SIZE:
COMPS-SALE DATA:
SALE DATE
SALE PRICE
SALE/SQ.FT.
SUBJECT - ASSESSMENT DATA
1994 ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT/SQ.FT.
REMARKS:
SUBJECT
PROPERTY COMP #1 COMP #2 COMP #3- COMP #4
Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler
one one one one one
1042 951 1042 918 1040
1042 951 1042 918 1040
1952 1953 1953 1949 1955
Average Average Good Average Average
5 4 6 4 5
0 0. 0 0 0
3 2 3 2 3
1 1 1, 3/4 1 1
1 0 0 0 0
500 300 500 300 500
No No No No No
0 0 0 1 2
Yes Yes Yes Yes No
264 4oo 336 352 280
0 144 GL 0 140 GL 0
No No No No No
75x133 78x172 75x133 78x126 66x136
12/91 11/93 8/93 9/93 1/93
81,000 88,000 86,ooo 83,000 86,ooo
77.73 92.53 82.53 90.41 82.69
SUBJECT - REVIEW APPRAISAL
75,000 86,000
71.98 82.53
1994 Example
f
?t
COMPARABLE #1
r?
LJ
COMPARABLE #3
jj ,, r ? \4 111
COMPARABLE #2
COMPARABLE #4
1994 Example
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
Study Session Letter No. 9
Agenda April 3, 1995
Issue Statement:
Approval of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health's 1994 Annual Report to the City
Council.
Background:
In 1976, the State Legislature passed the Community Health Services Act. The
purpose of the act is to develop and maintain a system of community health services
under local administration. Community health services are those services provided to
protect and improve people's health by preventing illness, disease and disease
disability.
The Community Health Services Act requires an Advisory Board of Health to advise,
consult with, or make recommendations to the Board of Health (City Council) on
matters relating to the development, maintenance, funding and evaluation of community
health services.
Each year the Richfield Advisory Board of Health compiles a summary report of their
activities. This information is presented in report form to the Richfield City Council for
• their information and acceptance. A copy of the board's annual report is sent to the
Minnesota Department of Health after it has been accepted by the Richfield City
Council.
The Richfield Advisory Board of Health's 1994 Annual Report received approval from
the members of the board at their February 27, 1995 meeting. Board members
requested that staff place the report on a Council agenda for formal presentation.
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that the Richfield City Council accept and approve the Richfield
Advisory Board of Health's 1994 Annual Report.
Basis for Recommendation:
1. By accepting and approving this report, the City will be in compliance with the
section of the State's Local Public Health Act which states that an Advisory Board of
Health is to "advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the community
health board on matters relating to the development, maintenance, funding and
evaluation of community health services.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. The Council could decide not to accept and approve the Richfield Advisory Board of
• Health's 1994 Annual Report. This would mean that the City of Richfield would not
be in compliance with the requirements of the State's Local Public Health Act.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The 1994 Richfield Advisory Board of Health's Annual Report is being presented for
City Council acceptance and approval at this time.
Respectfull submitted,
James . Prosser
City Manager
JDP:ds
•
0
City of Richfield
ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH
1994 ANNUAL REPORT
Submitted to the Richfield City Council
April 3, 1995
Carlene Ulmer, R.N.
Chair
Richfield Advtsnry Board
Mary Jane Markkula, R.N.
Vice-Chair
Richfield Advisory Board
J
s
City Manager
James D. Prosser
Mayor
Martin Kirsch
Council
Don Priebe Michael Sandahl
Susan Rosenberg Russ Susag
April 3, 1995
This report is being submitted to the Richfield City Council as a
summary of the activities of the Richfield Advisory Board of
Health (RABH) in 1994. It has been another active year for the
Board. Much of the work is done by the Board's three workgroups:
Addictions, Family Issues and Monitoring Other Issues. Two areas
of special focus this year were, smoking prevention and domestic
violence prevention.
Richfield restaurants were encouraged to become smoke free, and
were then recognized for their participation. The addictions
• workgroup sponsored a poster project for fifth grade students.
The posters publicized D-Day and the adverse effects of smoking.
They were displayed by local businesses and participating
students received certificates of appreciation from the City
Council for their work.
The Richfield Coalition Against Family Violence was convened last
year by the Family Violence task force of the Family Issues
workgroup. The coalition is composed of Richfield citizens and
agencies of various backgrounds working together on domestic
violence issues. In October, the coalition sponsored a half day
workshop on domestic violence for Richfield residents. The
coalition also submitted a grant proposal to the Minnesota
Department of Education for $3,000. This money will be used to
further the work of the coalition.
As Chair and Vice Chair of the Board, we are pleased to be a part
of this group, and proud of it's accomplishments. Board members
are to be commended, along with Richfield staff, Betsy
Christensen and Jean Flesher. These accomplishments could not
have been achieved without the time, energy, work, and
creativeness of board members and Staff. The support and
encouragement from the Richfield City Council is also
appreciated.
•
The Urban Hometown
An Equal Opportunity Employer
It is stated in the mission statement of Community Health
Services, "The mission of community health services is to bring
people together to create a healthy future for all Minnesotans."
So it is the mission of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health to
bring people together to create a healthy future for all
Richfield residents.
Respectfully submitted,
4L&? zevm_?
Carlene Ulmer, R.N.
Chair
Richfield Advisory Board
of Health
Mary ane Markkula, R.N.
Vice-Chair
Richfield Advisory Board
of Health
1994 WORXGROUPS
ADDICTIONS WORKGROUP
* Promote Smoke Free Restaurants
A letter was sent to all Richfield restaurants encouraging them
to become smoke-free. Each facility was then visited by a
workgroup member. Restaurants either became, or were currently
smoke free. These restaurants were recognized with certificates
at.a City Council meeting and an article in the Sun Current.
* Letter to Legislators Supporting a Tobacco Tax Increase.
A letter was written by a workgroup member and approved by the
board. It was then approved by the City Council and sent to
State Legislators.
* Information Session on Drugs for Senior Citizens.
Members sponsored and facilitated two talks on."How to take your
prescription drugs." One was given by a pharmacist, and the
other by a geriatric nurse specialist at a retirement community.
The session at the complex was well attended, and residents asked
many questions.
*-Smoking/Drug Poster Contest for Elementary Children.
Workgroup members worked with Sylvia Stevens (Director of Project
Charlie at the Richfield Public Schools) to sponsor a poster
project publicizing D-Day and the adverse affects of smoking.
The fifth graders made about 55 posters which were then placed by
board members in local business windows. Participants were also
given certificates of appreciation from the City Council for
their participation.
FAMILY ISSUES WORKGROUP
* Senior Issues
A member met with Bloomington Public Health nurses to discuss
ways of making their services more available to seniors. Elder
abuse was the topic of a breakout session at the domestic
violence forum.
4'
* Family Violence
Members planned, coordinated and facilitated a half day forum
entitled "Domestic Violence: How Bad is "It" in Richfield?" The
keynote speaker was Sheila Wellstone, a national voice against
domestic violence. Many local advocates also participated in the
forum. The program and speakers were exceptional, unfortunately
it was poorly attended.
A grant proposal was written for $3,000 to the Minnesota
Department of Education, to further the work of the Richfield
Coalition Against Family Violence.
* Parenting Issues
A breakout session at the domestic violence forum, was;
"Emotional Bruises: The effects of growing up in a violent
family." This session was led by Debra Goebel, a parent educator
from the Richfield/Bloomington Family Center; Ted Gwinn, a social
worker from Richfield High School, and Jay Henthorne, Juvenile
Investigator/School Liaison. Police Officer.
MONITORING OTHER ISSUES WORKGROUP
A member represented the Advisory Board at several conferences on
Health Care Reform. One was sponsored by YWCA and another by the
Minnesota Campaign for Women's Health.
Legislation was tracked on health issues and health care reform
in the Minnesota House and Senate. When bills were proposed on
Advisory Board study subjects, copies of the bills were obtained
and distributed to the committees.
A student member planned a week of educational activities on AIDS
at Richfield High School.
SUMMARY OF THE 1994_.RICHFIELD ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH
• ACTIVITIES
* 10 regular meetings.
* 3 new member orientation sessions.
* 2 study sessions with the City Council: 1993 Annual Report,
and an update of board activities in 1994.
* A few members.attended the City Council Meeting with State
Legislators.
* The board co-sponsored and the Chair co-moderated "A Forum
on Health Care", with the League of Women Voters.
* Changed the by-laws of the Advisory Board of Health so that
chair/vice-chair elections are held in February instead of
January.
* The Chair and Vice-Chair or designee attended two Board and
Commission Chair Meetings.
* Recommended, through the City Council, to the Richfield School
Board that a dental examination be included in their preschool
screening.
* New members appointed to the Board: Christopher McHan,
Salvador Valdovinos, Laura Holten, Cynthia Dubansky, and
Robert See.
* Members who resigned/terms expired from the board: Michael
Schrenk, Suzette Bechly, Jane Myre.
MEETING DATES IN 1994
January 19,1994
February 23, 1994
March- 21, 1994
April 18, 1994
May 16, 1994 -
June 20, 1994
July 18, 1994
September 19, 1994
October 17, 1994
November 21, 1994
SPEAKERS IN 1994
* Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Health Administrator. Health
services provided by Bloomington and an overview of
Minnesota Care.
* Steven Sutter, Richfield Fire Marshal. Emergency medical
system and 911 video.
* Pam Taschuk, Youth Resource Specialist, and Jay Henthorne,
Juvenile Liaison Police Officer. Working with juveniles in
Richfield.
* Diann Kirby, Bloomington Public Health. Vanguard Health
Promotion Services, Worksite Wellness.
* Petrona Lee, Bloomington Environmental Services-Manager, Paul
Alwood, Richfield Restaurant Inspector, Dick Holloway, Senior
Environmental Health Specialist/Plan Checker, Bloomington
Environmental Health Services.
CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH MEMBERSHIP
Carlene Ulmer, Chair Provider - Registered Nurse
Mary Jane Markkula, Vice Chair Provider - Registered Nurse
Kevin Keller Consumer
Jean Spencer Consumer
Doris Rubenstein Consumer
Suzette Bechly Consumer
Michael Schrenk Consumer
Jo Romer Provider - Registered Nurse
Carole Hippie Provider - Therapeutic
Recreation Specialist
Bill Swanson Consumer
Elisa Pluhar High School Student
Laura Holten High School Student
Christopher McHan Consumer
Salvador Valdovinos Provider-Psychologist
Cynthia Dubansky Provider-Social Worker
Robert See Consumer
LIAISON MEMBERS
Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor and Richfield City Council Liaison
Susan Rosenberg; Richfield City Council Alternate Liaison
Betsy Christensen, Richfield City Staff Liaison
Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Public Health Liaison
ADDICTIONS TASK FORCE
Kevin Keller
Suzette Bechly
Mary Jane Markkula
Chris McHan
Cynthia Dubansky
Elisa Pluhar
Laura Holten
FAMILY ISSUES TASK FORCE
Jean Spencer
Jo Romer
Carlene Ulmer
Carole Hippie
Bill Swanson
MONITORING OTHER ISSUES TASK FORCE
Doris Rubenstein
Michael Schrenk
0
i
v?
Cl)
o,E
E
U
y..
O
r.
O
bra
y
1-
C5
s
c
O
a
cts
Nc
O U
ca
00
Rf
.U
E c*
ca a
O -cm
0,0
N C
O Cu
a
aca
N >
a?
O m
Om
aMca OM
oC
ca >0. 4-0 0
U=fl.C?•_
EECOOo
acv ca E O E
o Co
E
O
0.0 mho
C
tiS N O?
Eo
a? a 0
0 L>, al E
NQj?U•C
O w
.> O N
= ca
co 0 mom
CO (a
N
U '- (%S C
00?C0
a O O.C
?,0
-ca CD r-
a?
v?ai?ooo
as 0 0
CO
aC
co E
N
>
ao cu
> •co0 o
C
Mo cf
oaa)
U C «6
00
C c
U
M O 'C
co M
0"E
z,aE
o Es
?. O O
O
2:1a
?C
'C co .
0-
O C O
O
O?
N0a
=> o
a
Co N -
ctS
C?a
Co
>Ma
O cu
Eai
0'a c
C
to C
CO 0
Co > O
00-
O
'O
F-, v 0
cts C
a
a?
'C
a?
Q 0
?oF
VOj U
C
ctY
ca
Octswo
z 0 `=
C ca
Qa
a?
c0
O L.7 O
_c 0=
O U C
co O
.N 0 •a
_co00_
.0 Ca Ct3 -Q
•?-
0 NC
C N CO.
O O
N U O E
C O•-L
N .D-00
O Co
C
aWCVO
CO O CL
c
O = N
= O O L ?O ¦
(1)
1) 0
2
O 4)
Q. IM
_ ?.•
y
Cl) ,
O
E 0 z"
O
N
v _
tai
v •- o
0 o
VII. A