Loading...
4-3-95 agenda• CITY OF RICHFIELD MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1995 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. 7:00-7:15 P.M. PRESENTATION OF ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1994 STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 9 II. 7:15-7:30 P.M. DISCUSSION OF BOARD OF REVIEW PROCEDURES STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 10 III. 7:30-7:45 P.M. DISCUSSION OF POLICY AND STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AIRPORT RELATED ISSUES STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 11 IV. 7:45-8:15 P.M. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES IN CITY OF RICHFIELD STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 12 V. 8:15-8:30 P.M. DISCUSSION OF UPDATE OF RICHFIELD WATER SYSTEM STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 13 VI. 8:30-8:45 P.M. DISCUSSION OF SUPPORT FOR NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT'S SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 14 VII. 8:45-9:00 P.M. DISCUSSION OF AUTOMOBILE REIMBURSEMENT ALLOWANCE STUDY SESSION LETTER NO. 15 • 9:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT AUXILIARY AIDS FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. REQUESTS MUST BE MADE AT LEAST 96 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT 861-9702. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 15 Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Council discussion and staff direction on adjusting mileage and automobile reimbursement allowances. Background: In 1979, the City elected to reduce its City-owned fleet of cars which were provided to certain employees. As this occurred, these employees were compensated as follows: • City Manager and Public Safety Director were provided automobiles. • Other Department Directors and specific employees whose job responsibility requires daily extensive use of their vehicle for work duties were provided monthly car allowances. • A mileage reimbursement rate was provided to employees who occasionally had to use their vehicles on City business. • In 1994, due to a Legislative change, the City Manager could no long have a City- owned vehicle. The Council authorized up to a $550 per month car allowance. Currently, the Manager has requested a $350 per month car allowance. In 1990, the following rates for other employees were authorized: 0 $200 per month for Department Directors and other designated employees. 0 25.5 cents for mileage reimbursement. No other increases have been made since 1990. The current standard mileage rate established by the IRS is 30 cents. Recommended Motion: Staff is seeking Council discussion and direction on this issue. Staff is recommending: • An increase of $25 in the monthly automobile allowance. • An increase of 4.5 cents per mile (to 30 cents per mile) for mileage reimbursement. In addition, the City Manager and Public Safety Director would be eligible to receive a car allowance in lieu of a City-owned vehicle in an amount not to exceed the $550 per month previously approved by the Council. In the future, reimbursement rates will be reviewed as part of the annual budget process. Basis of Recommendation: 1. No adjustments have been made to these allowances for five years. 2. The IRS has raised the mileage rate to 30 cents per mile, and the City rate is still at 25.5 cents per mile. 3. The proposed new reimbursement rates are competitive with those paid by other cities. 4. If an adjustment is authorized, each Department. would be required to absorb the increase within their current funding levels. 5. It is less costly for the City to provide car allowances rather than furnishing cars due to insurance, fuel, maintenance and, of course, the cost of the vehicle. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council may decide to maintain the current automobile reimbursement rates. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is being placed on the April 3 Study Session for Council discussion. Staff is seeking Council direction on how to implement changes in these allowances now and in the future. I1* submitted, Jamogp. Prosser. City nager JDP:cak 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD Memorandum DATE: March 15, 1995 TO: Bridget Walstrom, Finance Manager FROM: James D. Prosser, City Manager SUBJECT: 1995 Car Allowance Payments The following City employees should be paid a $200 monthly car allowance, payable the first pay period of each month during 1995. Gretchen Blank, Leisure Services Coordinator Steven Devich, Administrative Services Director Michael Eastling, City Engineer Donald Fondrick, Community Services Director William Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director Randy Hughes, Operations Coordinator Dennis Neudecker, Chief Building Inspector Roger Spencer, Maintenance Superintendent John Thom, Utility Superintendent Byron Wallace, Community Development Director David Rahn, Housing Inspector David Scherbel, Housing Inspector I (employed March 6, 1995; to receive 1/2 month payment for March) Jim Prosser, City Manager ($350/month) JDP:cak Copy: Department Directors CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 14 Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Support for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's Surface Water Management Plan. Background: Through the years the Board of Managers of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District have relied heavily on the cities within the District to provide the technical and political support to accomplish their surface water management goals. The District's Surface Water Management Plan (Plan) is consistent with these past practices. The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) review of the Plan (BWSR has approval authority) questions this reliance on cities and suggests that the District take a stronger role. District Managers, through a letter from the District's attorney, are asking for city support of the present Plan. This support can take three forms: 1. Pass a resolution in support of their Plan at the April 10, 1995 City Council Meeting. 2. Designate a City Council Member to attend the April 5, 1995 meeting of the District Managers and BWSR members (or City staff if no Council Member is available). is 3. Send a letter of support signed by the Mayor. The specific issues that the District and BWSR are discussing: 1. District reliance on petitions from cities to initiate District funded projects. 2. District intention to rely on guidelines and best management practices previously published by State agencies and departments rather than promulgating unique and free-standing rules and ordinances special to the District thus allowing flexibility at the City level. Recommended Motion: Although a Study Session, Council may choose to give strong direction in preparation for the April 5 meeting of the Nine Mile Creek District managers and BWSR by agreeing to send a member of the Council to the April 5 meeting. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The practice of past years for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to rely on cities has worked well. • 2. The District has prepared a Surface Water Management Plan consistent with these past practices. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Send a letter of support signed by the Mayor. 2. Provide continued support of the past Nine Mile Creek Watershed District practice to rely on cities by scheduling action to consider a resolution at the April 10 Council meeting. 3. Do all of the recommended actions. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is on the April 3 Study Session agenda. Direction from Council should be clear at this time especially if there is to be personal attendance and/or a letter submitted at the April 5 meeting of Nine Mile Creek Watershed District managers and the Board of Water and Soil Resources. ubmitted, RespeY.Pros-ser James City Manager 0 JDP:ds • • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 13 Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Update on Richfield water system. Background: The Council met at and toured the Water Plant, 6221 Portland Avenue, for the February 6, 1995 Study Session. Status of the Water Plant renovation was discussed at that time. A report which included an analysis from Camp Dresser & McKee, water consultants, was part of the discussion as were factors related to taste, color and odor Richfield's water. Council requested periodic discussions and updates related to Richfield's water. Weekly information is provided in the Status and Information report. Continued discussion at this Study Session is also part of the requested updating. Recommended Motion: This item is provided for informational purposes only. 10 Basis of Recommendation: Does not apply. Alternative Recommendation: Does not apply. Discussion/Decision Mode: This item is scheduled for 7 p.m. on April 3, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Jame. Prosser City Manager JDP:cak 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 12 Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Discussion of public safety issues in the City of Richfield. Background: Public Safety Director Jack Erskine will review public safety issues and new initiatives to address areas of concern. Recommended Motion: This discussion is for the benefit of the Council so that they are better informed when responding to their constituents. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Public safety issues are a high priority concern for the City of Richfield. 2. The Council will become informed of the Public Safety Department's response to these concerns. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: Public safety concerns are presented for Council discussion at the April 3 Study Session. Respectf submitted, James . Prosser City Manager JDP:cak • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 11 Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Policy and strategy recommendations for airport related issues. Background: Recent developments regarding airport issues include the following: • New Ford Town and Rich Acres Acquisition Phase II is progressing as Phase I is being completed. There are three residents from the first phase who have not gone through closing procedures. As of March 21, fourteen residents have yet to relocate. There are four owners in Phase II that will not acknowledge receipt of W.D. Schock and MAC correspondences. These owners have been notified that they will be deferred to a later phase unless an immediate response is received. MAC is expecting to receive a grant from the FAA by the end of March for over $8 million. Matching funds are expected to provide enough money to finish acquiring all single-family residential units. A third auction was held in March with 43 of the 50 homes available being sold. The . auctions have netted,approximately $500,000 in additional project funds, including a savings of roughly $300,000 in demolition costs. Several movers have requested permission to store beams and other equipment somewhere in the City, as well as temporary holding lot space for homes in transit. Both requests have been denied for reasons of liability and unsightliness. Home buyers from the latest auction will also be receiving a letter notifying them that some movers have not fully complied with the requirement to leave properties in their natural state by depositing excessive amounts of fill dirt in the streets. In the event of future incidents, the Community Services Department will sweep the streets and bill the home buyer for a minimum of two hours, at $40 per hour. 4-22 Extension There has been no word on an expected date of release for the FAA Record of Decision or the state approval from MnDOT. Staff met with Charles Dayton from the law firm of Leonard, Street and Deinard. Dayton is an experienced and respected environmental litigator, and will assist Steven Pflaum as local counsel if litigation is pursued. Mr. Pflaum sent a letter to the Bloomington City Attorney, David Orenstein, updating him on the purpose of a legal challenge and expected litigation strategy. Since Bloomington's City Council has endorsed a potential lawsuit, Mr. Pflaum detailed several alternatives for their participation as discussed previously by the Richfield City Council. A copy of Bloomington's airport policies is attached. • MASAC The regular monthly meeting was held on Tuesday, March 28, 1995. The Council voted 16-5 to.approve the New Noise Management Methodology (NNMM). The NNMM will be forwarded to the MAC Planning & Environment Committee. NNMM is a monitoring tool to track air carriers participation in voluntary noise reduction programs at MSP. The previous monitoring report, ADNE, expired in 1992 and was a completely unintelligible document for most people. The goals of NNMM are to ensure that carriers are complying with Stage 3 aircraft in-phasing, restrict nighttime departures and arrivals (11 p.m. - 6 a.m.), provide flight crew training to reduce noise impacts, and require all carries to be fully Stage 3 integrated by December 31, 1999 (as required by federal law). NNMM is not an enforcement program. It is, however, the beginning of what the MASAC Operations Committee hopes to be far reaching cooperation and compliance among MSP's users and communities. The Operations Committee is planning to address the "shoulder hours" of 10 p.m. - 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. - 7 a.m. in the near future. Operations Committee members, as well as representatives of several airlines and the Airline Pilots Association, argued that this is a significant step forward because it is a major concession on the part of carriers. Minneapolis, Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights objected that the NNMM contained no enforcement mechanism and was not aggressive enough. MASAC members were treated to an informational briefing on the usefulness of Global Positioning System (GPS) technology applied to aviation. MSP will be the first airport in the nation to receive the instrumentation for the initial integration. GPS allows air traffic controllers and pilots to pinpoint their location within 22 centimeters, which far exceeds the ILS range of 4 degrees. GPS not only allows for operations in any conditions, it actually pilots the plane by selecting turning points and glide slopes. FAA would like to have GPS fully integrated into the national system by 1998. Amazingly, GPS ground systems cost about $600,000 less than ILS ground systems. MAC's John Foggia describes it as the single greatest aviation innovation since the jet engine. Dual Track Planning Process MAC authorized spending $50,000 to analyze the Remote Runway Concept. The study is not officially included as part of the Dual Track Airport Planning Process. As reported last month, Rep. Dee Long had sponsored a bill to include the concept in the Dual Track. However, it is expected that she will rescind the bill since MAC has authorized the study. • Congressional Update Staff continues to monitor congressional actions. At the MASAC meeting on March 7, MAC Executive Director Jeff Hamiel reported on a wide range of airport topics. Future federal funding is a major concern due to the new congressional leadership. He also reported that Commissioner John Himle is urging MAC to divorce themselves from federal funds. Himle is strongly opposed to trust funds, such as the Aviation Trust Fund, and wants MAC to show others around the country that airports are viable independent entities. To date, no movement has been made by Congress on the Department of Transportation structure or the Aviation Trust Fund. • Part 150 Sound Insulation Program Sound proofing continues to progress through northeast Richfield. MAC has developed a new prioritization map, complete with individual block prioritization and Ldn Noise Contours. Priorities 1-6 were completed in 1993 and 1994. Priorities 7-21 are expected to be entered into the process during 1995. Considering there are many residents who choose not to participate for various reasons, it is possible the project may reach priorities 22-24. Resident inquiries regarding sound proofing continue to be high (see attachment). Recommended Motion: Discuss current airport policy issues. Basis of Recommendation: It is important for the Council to provide direction to staff on airport policy. Alternative Recommendation: Defer discussion to another date. Discussion/Decision Mode: This matter will be discussed at the Study Session of April 3, 1995. Respectf y submitted, Jame , . Prosser City Manager JDP:cak Attachment 11 ?J • Resident Contact: Sound Proofing & Airport Concerns c . X.x ........................................... ................................................. ................................................. .............................................. ::: •.: ::::::..::::::.:::::::. :.::::::::::::..:::::::::::::::::. :::: :. Noise after 1 p.m. Question answered. Tues., Feb. 28 70th & Oakland has increased in last MAC'S noise 3 months. Can they complaint phone # be sound roofed? given. She was insulated in Staff contacted CEE. Tues., Feb. 28 6332 18th Avenue Dec. 93 and has They have several really bad window CEE i other cases like this. i t E i condensat on. ' xpert com n o ng hasn t helped her. look at windows. Where is sound uestion answere . Wed., Mar. 1 No name given. 7500 16th Avenue proofing being done? What's hap- 4-22 issue explained. No follow-up enin with 4-224. requested. How is sour Question answered. Fri., Mar. 3 6400 17th Avenue proofing going? Resident is among When will he be 1995 priority. included? How will 4-22 a ect 4-2 impacts Mar. 3 Fri. 6825 Garfield him? Can he get a explained. Map of , map of noise contour, flight paths impacts? & runway use figures sent to him. ow is soun Q uestion answered. Tues., Mar. 7 6300 15th Avenue proofing coming? ll b l No follow-up t d e What exact y wi e . reques done to his home? When is he being Question answered. Mar. 7 Tues. 6338 16th Avenue insulated? How can Will find out why , people on Blmtgn B . gm is higher Ave be higher priority on contour priori than him? ma than 16th. Is her house eligible Question answered. Mar. 8 Wed. 7000 block of 17th. for sound insulation No follow-up , program? requested. Why is everyone Question answered. Mar. 8 Wed. 6344 16th Avenue around them being Neighbor of Mar. 7 , insulated first? caller. Explained l f d When will they be e or sche u done? insulation program. Unsatisfied wi Exp Fine selection Thur., Mar. 9 6344 16th Avenue answer day before. process and d R f h d l Who decides erre e e u e. sc addresses to be him to MAC for included? further info. What is appening Question answered. ll N f Mar. 13 Mon. 7435 Bloomington with sound ow-up o o , roofm ? requested. at is a south W Runway 4-22 issue Mon., Mar. 13 7515 16th Avenue Richfield sound proofing schedule? explained. No follow-up requested. Is her house a igi a Question answered. N i d l 4 22 Mar. 13 Mon 6401 11th Avenue for sound proofing? o ne . exp a - ., follow-up requested. Why was neighbor Schedule explained. Mon., Mar. 13 63 10 Bloomington invited to CEE Will be included in session and she was next seminar. not? Referred to CEE. • She state that sound Insulation explained Tues., Mar. 14 No name given. 68th & Oakland proofing is not an as voluntary. 4-22 answer to airport issue explained. noise. Everyone MASAC explained. should share the No follow-up noise. City should requested. not o ose 4-22. When is her house Question answered. Tues., Mar. 14 6412 15th Avenue being insulated? Th h i hi Priority 30, probably l 9 oug t t was t s ate 1 96. No ear? follow-up requested. What is the schedule 4-22 issue explained. Wed., Mar. 15 No name given. 7600 block of 15th for south Richfield No follow-up sound proofing? requested. What is the schedule Question answered. Wed., Mar. 15 6332 14th Avenue of 1995? Are they Priority 20 is included? included in 1995. Is is house goin g to uesrion answered. Wed., Mar. 15 No name given. 6438 17th Avenue be sound proofed He is ppriority 24, this ear? robabl earl `96. When is is house Question answered. Wed., Mar. 15 6533 17th Avenue getting sound No follow-up proofed? Can he requested. move u m riori ? When wi s e be Question answere . Wed., Mar. 15 No name given. 6345 13th Avenue sound proofed? Was Priority 20. No told "soon" two follow-up requested. ears ago. toppe in to see i uestion answere Wed., Mar. 15 Non-resident 5617 32nd Avenue there was M Is. by phone message Minneapolis sound proofing info next day. Referred at Richfield. to CEE. How will 4-22 uestions answered. Mon., Mar. 20 No name given. 6800 block of 14th extension and N/S No follow-up runway affect him? requested. Will it affect property values? When can he be uestion answered. Mon., Mar. 20 6438 14th Avenue included in the No follow-up sound proofing? requested. 7345 12 h A Is her house a iggi e f d f ? Airport question h Tues., Mar. 21 t venue or soun proo mg answered. Gave er How cans he ether the number for house painted;. Metro Paint-a-thon. This information was gathered February 27 - March 24, 1995.* *Note: Names of residents have been deleted for this report. Council Members wishing to respond directly to a resident's comment or question may do so by contacting the Media Assistant/Airport Issues at ext. 716. JDV:ttf 0 J 0 • City of Bloomington Airport Policies On March 6, 1995, the Bloomington City Council unanimously adopted the following 11 airport policies. These policies are based on an extensive review and public comment process conducted over a 10-month period. Airport Location and Improvements In 1989 the Legislature directed the Metropolitan Airports Commission and Metropolitan Council to study the capacity and expansion potential of MSP airport compared to a new airport located south of Hastings. The study will result in a comparative cost and impact report to the legislature in July 1996. All studies indicate that the MSP airport can be improved to handle even the largest year 2020 passenger and aircraft operation forecasts. The airport is responsible for substantial economic benefits for Bloomington residents and businesses. Analysis by several agencies and consultants agree that passenger emplanements and aircraft operations at MSP will increase so that MSP will require both runway and terminal enhancements in the near future. Location Improvements 4-22 Extension Policy 1: MSP should continue as the region's passenger and cargo airport. Policy 2: Improvements should be made to keep MSP operating safely and efficiently. Noise mitigation should proceed in conjunction with operational changes. Policy 3a: Bloomington encourages prompt implementation of the north- south runway both as a means for increasing airport capacity and as a reasonable measure for mitigating noise in cities surrounding the airport. Policy 3b: Bloomington has no preference for alternative locations to add terminal space at MSP. Policy 4a: Bloomington supports extension of Runway 4-22 by 2,750 feet if MAC demonstrates that the extension is essential for economic growth and that noise mitigation has been adequately addressed. Policy 4b: Bloomington supports use of extended Runway 4-22 for heavy aircraft or emergency situations where a long runway is needed and to allow two runway operation and adequate runway length while 11R29L is being reconstructed. Policy 4c: Bloomington opposes changing the Runway Use System to simultaneously use runways 4-22 and 11L29R to redistribute aircraft flights and noise. Aircraft Noise and Land Use Having the airport as a neighbor creates noise and land use conflicts. By the year 2000, jet aircraft are required to comply with federal stage 3 standards. Stage 3 aircraft have significantly less noise impact than stage 2 aircraft. In addition, noise insulation and land use compatibility modifications can reduce aircraft noise nuisance. Noise Policy 5: Bloomington supports aggressive mitigation of noise impacts to Mitigation minimize the airport's nuisance effect on residents around the airport. Policy 6a: Runway 4-22 noise mitigation should be done by MAC at the same time as the runway extension. Policy 6b: Bloomington petitions MAC to approve a runway 4-22 land use compatibility program consisting of acquisition of 72 occupied single-family houses, two 2-family houses and one vacant single- family lot. Policy 7: North-south runway noise mitigation should be done by MAC at the same time as the runway construction. Policy 8: Bloomington will adopt sound insulation codes for new construction within the LDN60 contour. Land Use Policy 9: Bloomington will use local controls to the maximum extent Compatibility possible to achieve and improve land use compatibility with MSP airport. Safety Zones Policy 10a: Bloomington will develop alternative land use plans that address potential federal and state safety zones for the north-south runway. Policy 10b: MAC and the FAA should accept responsibility for all costs of implementing runway safety zones. Policy 10c: Bloomington and MAC should cooperate to define flexible safety zone performance standards which minimize the impact of restrictions on developable property. Policy 11: MAC should acquire the Met Center property as a means to minimize the total public cost of safety zone protection 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. io Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Review of 1995 Board of Review procedures. Background: The 1995 Richfield Board of Review is scheduled for Monday, May 1, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. As provided by City Charter, the Board of Review consists of the Mayor, Council Members and two citizens appointed by the City Manager with the confirmation by City Council. Mr. Lawrence Emond and Mr. Glenn Erickson were recently appointed to serve on the 1995 Board of Review. The duties and responsibilities of the Board of Review are established by State law. In general, it is the Board's responsibility to hear appeals by property owners regarding the estimated market value established by the City Assessor and to determine if market values should be adjusted. The appeal is to address market values rather than tax rates or other concerns which property owners may bring up to the Board. The Richfield property assessment was conducted through a contract with Hennepin County which is supervised by the Administrative Services Department. Staff works closely with Hennepin County Property Appraisers to ensure that the local assessment complies with the provisions of the law. In order to prepare for the Board of Review meeting scheduled for May 1, 1995 a review session has been established for April 3, 1995. At that meeting Larry Miller, the Hennepin County Principal Property Appraiser assigned to Richfield, will present information pertaining to the 1995 assessment and Board of Review process. Recommended Motion: It is recommended that the Council prepare for the Board of Review with a presentation from Larry Miller. Basis of Recommendation: 1. It is important to review significant property appraisal issues prior to the time of the meeting. 2. It is important for the Board to review their statutory responsibilities prior to the meeting. Alternative Recommendation: None. Discussion/Decision Mode: This matter will be presented at the Study Session on April 3, 1995. Respectfully submitted, Jam D. Prosser P City Manager JDP:ds • n CITY OF RICHFIELD COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MONDAY, APRIL 3, 1995 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW INFORMATION 0 E 4 4 585 Edina 142,654 152,634 179.852 196,486 188,380 189,921 200,868 394 Carver County 99,438 109,824 ANNUAL REV11W `AL PROPERTY TYPES L 1994 RESIDENTIA I:`HOME . °, : E •' .. - a.. = - : AL' , S? 1 am E 1 (1 gle S 1 Y?M Listings Total Dollar Unit Average titaa ,gw ' Processed Volume Sales Sales Price COIL(?OII11I1111111? t0?4'1111QusPy Coapp 1972 33,635 $436,396 177 14 788 $29 510 ?tiVERAISJe/ DRIVES 1973 33,966 , 489,373,859 , 15,518 , 31,536 1974 27.865 500,401,086 14,481 34,555 1975 31,271 585,954,410 15,381 -38,095 1976 34.940 773,837,914 18,476 41,883 AVERAGE MEDIAN 1977 38;879 1,115,698,038 23.271 47,943 January $110,000 $95,600 1978 36,095 1,296,246,066 22,780 57,178 1979 40,007 1,351,465,288 20,466 66,417 February 7 1 4 ,700 96.500 1980 37,018 1,340,772,915 18,351 74,069 11 1 , 800 March 94,300 1981 35,580 1,249,787,584 15,675 80,238 April 113,400 98,600 1982 41,465 998,693,468 12,193 82,288 May 111,600 95,900 1983 50,794 1,344,916,756 15.914 84,953 June 114,100 99,700 1984 53,646 1,544,535,531 18,231 85,007 July 117,500 99,700 1985 51,492 1,866,291,153 21,335 87,789 August 116,700 100,400 1986 58,382 2,523,647,113 28,015 90.319 September 118 100 700 99 1987 55,422 2,460,309,115 25,772 95,914 , , 1988 80,771 3,211,389,403 34,244 93,977 October 115,200 96,600 1989 89,170 3,277,302,913 33,962 96,658 November 115,300 96,500 1990 78.548 3,372,262,409 34,496 98,016 December 121,300 99,200 1991 71,850 3,522,813,135 35,598 99,402 1992 72,730 4,309,040,911 41,944 103,264 1993 70,685 4,300,305,967 39,842 107,569 Figures are rounded to nearest $100 and $100 1994 63,369 4,733,426,199 42,454 111,806 include all residential sales for RMLS. r? •sa :?`"; I4 _ ''s#r ': ^'? .?', .. !'.l" v'a.. ?a[x? AVERAGE SA I'? LES PR ICE BY DI STRI CT= SING LE FAMII, a • 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 550 Calhoun-Harriet $92,897 $98,682 $112,634 $115,451 $116,029 $121,117 $122,008 1993 1994 551 Cedar Isles-Loring 110,348 122,760 175,545 171,830 219,862 211,267 200,881 Minneapolis 552 North 55,701 53,997 52,825 55,667 53,435 54,181 53,080 300 Calhoun-Isles $153,168 $178.990 301 Camden 57,388 55,026 553 Northeast 61,672 63,045 63,370 63,840 64,645 65,414 66,234 303 Longfellow 69,180 73.246 554 Parkway West 93,530 98,163 100,405 105,461 107,090 109,846 109,588 304 Nokomis 82,748 84.565 555 Parkway Central 77,409 76.851 80,189 83,241 83,712 86,840 88,446 305 North 51,568 43,953 556 Parkway South 63,364 67,130 68,616 66.973 70,761 70,595 70,652 306 Northeast 67,556 65,748 557 South 61,115 61,825 62,317 63,127 63.695 66,944 67,495 307 Phillips 41,253 32,732 558 South Central 52,184 51,587 49,136 49.630 51,220 50,510 48,894 308 Powderhom 63,277 57,002 309 Southwest 118,534 128,723 559 Southeast 73,861 74,314 73,196 78,685 81,215 65,697 79,124 310 University 82,370 83,946 560 St. Paul & Suburban 82,797 110,473 Suburban and other areas 563 Isanti County 56,399 59,830 63,830 66,235 340 Buffalo 97,702 101,236 564 Blaine-Lexington, Circle Pines 73,638 75,052 341 Wright County 85,103 93,406 565 Falcon Heights-Roseville, Arden Hills 105,100 107,244 342 Hutchinson 75,702 79,526 Shoreview - 343 McLeod 65,250 66,646 360 Robbinsdale 77,874 82.274 566 New Brighton-Moundsview, St. Anthony _ 89,812 95,504 98.878 102,486 106,085 361 Crystal 80,323 80,663 567 Coon Rapids-Anoka 75.904 77.887 362 New Hope 93,094 103,443 568 Fridley-Columbia Heights, Spring Lk Pk 73,788 76,404. 363 Brooklyn Center 77,897 78,878 569 Suburban NE 74,165 76.903 364 Brooklyn Park 96,775 105,641 570 Sibley County 79,503 86,176 365 Maple Grove / Osseo 130,387 142.872 571 Brooklyn Center-Park 75,812 77,837 87.606 89,466 89,401 89,104 91,869 366 Champlin 102,558 113,051 367 Hennepin Co North 129,863 136,165 572 Wright/Sherburne Counties 62,232 65,081 69,880 72,120 74,130 77,850 82,442 368 Hennepin Co NW 179,230 178.293 573 Golden Valley/Tyrol Hills 105,237 105.371 114,238 113,613 118,860 119,438 119,699 370 Sibley County 59,000 75,038 574 Plymouth 120,323 126.910 145.748 151,612 153,820 151,483 160,141 373 Golden Valley 128,603 132,215 575 Robbinsdale-Crystal-New Hope 74.433 77.689 80.144 81,266 81,370 81,146 84 468 374 Plymouth 171,532 187,918 576 Dayton-Champlin-Maple Grove-Osseo 85 544 92 627 104 199 106 767 112 030 112 070 , 115 466 378 Richfield 86,150 92,260 , . , , , , , 379_ Bloomington - East 88,070 94,569 577 Suburban NW 90,579 98,805 107,938 125.869 117,650 148,008 135,817 380 Bloomin ton - West 157 418 156 131 578 Richfield 76.968 77.274 79,801 81,753 82.847 82,994 85,181 g , 381 Lake Minnetonka No 238 535 , 287 306 579 East Bloomington 78,210 79,500 83.435 85,913 86,052 85,943 89,375 , 382 Lake Minnetonka West 155,471 , 144,015 580 West Bloomington 109,963 115,103 134,625 133,679 131,377 136,269 144,396 383 Lake Minnetonka So 223,746 262.619 581 Mendota Heights-Eagan, Inver Grove Hts 95,617 105,342 385 Edina 214,290 226,948 582 Burnsville 93,985 101,801 114,829 122,581 123,956 123,590 386 Hopkins 97,882 107,208 387 Minnetonka 168,031 184,818 583 Suburban South 83,261 87,231 • 391 Saint Louis Park 100,584 106,856 684 Apple V.1ley-Rosemount-Lakeville 93,401 103,109 392 Eden Prairie 175,454 206,057 , 587 Hopkins-Minnetonka 112,915 122,772 138,603 150,368 148,849 148,371 154,544 395 Waterfront 85,099 92,295 589 Lake Minnetonka 133,215 158,729 172,208 180,700 178,719 171,361 190,743 396 Chanhassen 164,240 182,828 591 SL Louis Park 79,091 79,587 90,582 90,369 91,206 93,633 94,582 397 Chaska 126,421 132,502 398 Victoria 174,270 207,068 592 Eden Prairie 116,734 126,632 148,971 163,400 167,836 157,322 168,219 399 Out of Town 94,807 73,861 593 Eastern Carver County 80,402 89,643 112,418 120,318 130,022 129,359 141,155 12 • February 1995 ¦ 2,--- Og--- n 0 a Z =! D w. &ntl I; 31w ?1- ?; s ??j?"I ntnt -- 3?? 3c l 3nv 5 1( -3nv ANON)! ¦ 1091---- I ---g _ i c e v e i s c \` j C I ^` W I ~ nt rv03J !?^ c1c 00 - C9 ' f1J W E. 1. I J 1 UJ Z ?) r.U W3M Z Nr I I ? v k t: V %ON% w Y O ,I X? Ln m ?o a • N IL y y r? O? \ O Ol O` O 1 M Pr) = \ H O r•t W y U W H J > y W y J H O t- H Z F- W cT H w y o w U. H O J 2 W H H d U- ui V Z H W w 2 N U + C 1 m ? L 7K 1 L 7K >K .? 7 , U 7K 1K 1 U 1K >K * t * * * + O O 1K >K 1K 1 ? ?1 * * )K 1 1K * * 1 r? )K •• >K t 1K >K >K 1 ' A * * >K * 1 ri >K 1K >K * 1 Cfl 1K k( * * !K 1 tiD K >K * 1K )K * * 1 U X 7K 1K 7K 7K 7K 1K 1 C L * 7K )K 7K 1K ?i 7 0. * * * >K * t a o CL * * * 1 m t6 * * >K * )K * 1 L 7K )K * * )K >K + O Y• N >K >K )K * * * 1 M f0 1K tK 1K )K * * 1 7 7K * * 7K 1K * * t L N 17 >K >K * >K * * * + O! m r? * >K * * )K ? )K * 1 N U O 1K 1K >K * >K * ? * 1 .r{ .a 7K * * 7K 7K + Ln 2 m E * >K * >K * >K >K * 1 e-t c ? 1K W. >K * * * >K * * i .r{ N * 7k W. 1K 7K W, 1K * 1K * 1 N 7K 1K 1K 1K 1K 1K >K * * * ? 1 _ N 1K 1K tK IK >K * ? * W. 7K .? ? * * 7K •• 7K M.' 1 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H. H H H+ O •1+ M0%%7CD %Dr{??Mas o%DrINhl)a, o%Dr•1?. C %T N P-4 C COD N Ltd %T N r•t O CD N in r N r-I co 0 N m M .rl O r•I ?t /? C; N Lg 0p rl ?T V? C; N Lq-CO r 1 ?7 h o N U1 C0 Q hr.NOD 00CD OD 0%01V?00oor-4P4"tNNNN ? 1•?1 r•l ri ri ri ri r? H ri ri ri •rt S N NO V J Q E- z LLJ 0 CO t1J W Z U r -- M i j Cj I o ! N N O ni `O LO i0 M O c+? 0 N r i j . r f O N i ? N co O LO 0) rn M 0) NV 0 rn O co co co cc) _ Q Ow co } 00 1}' 00 (Y) .00 N co r 00 0 00 O ti O ti to O LO O LO O LO N N V- 1N3ON3d • SUBJECT PROPERTY Address XXXX XX Avenue South PID XX-028-24-41-0010 St Hei ht One h B 1 ory g at s 1st Floor Area 1042 sq. ft. Baths 1 in basement Gross Building Area 1042 sq. ft. Finished Basement 500 sq. ft. Year Built 1952 Walkout No Condition Average Fireplace No 1st Floor Rooms Kitchen, living Air Conditioning Yes room, 3 bedrooms Garage Single attached 2nd Floor Rooms 0 Porches/Deck None Bedrooms Lot Size 75x133 Comments: Property sold 12/91 for $81,000 . , 1994 Example - GRID - COMPARABLE DATA APPLICANT'S NAME: ADDRESS: PROPERTY ADDRESS: P.I.D. #: MUNIC: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XX Avenue South XXXX XX Avenue South XX-028-24-41-0010 Richfield • BUILDING TYPE: STORY HEIGHT: 1ST FLOOR AREA: GROSS BLDG. AREA: YR. OF CONST.: CONDITION: 1ST FL. ROOMS: 2ND FL. ROOMS: BEDROOMS: BATHS: HALF BATHS: FIN. BSMT. SQ.FT.: WALKOUT: FIREPLACE: AIR COND: GARAGE AREA: PORCH AREA: DECK: LOT SIZE: COMPS-SALE DATA: SALE DATE SALE PRICE SALE/SQ.FT. SUBJECT - ASSESSMENT DATA 1994 ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT/SQ.FT. REMARKS: SUBJECT PROPERTY COMP #1 COMP #2 COMP #3- COMP #4 Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler one one one one one 1042 951 1042 918 1040 1042 951 1042 918 1040 1952 1953 1953 1949 1955 Average Average Good Average Average 5 4 6 4 5 0 0. 0 0 0 3 2 3 2 3 1 1 1, 3/4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 500 300 500 300 500 No No No No No 0 0 0 1 2 Yes Yes Yes Yes No 264 4oo 336 352 280 0 144 GL 0 140 GL 0 No No No No No 75x133 78x172 75x133 78x126 66x136 12/91 11/93 8/93 9/93 1/93 81,000 88,000 86,ooo 83,000 86,ooo 77.73 92.53 82.53 90.41 82.69 SUBJECT - REVIEW APPRAISAL 75,000 86,000 71.98 82.53 1994 Example f ?t COMPARABLE #1 r? LJ COMPARABLE #3 jj ,, r ? \4 111 COMPARABLE #2 COMPARABLE #4 1994 Example CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Study Session Letter No. 9 Agenda April 3, 1995 Issue Statement: Approval of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health's 1994 Annual Report to the City Council. Background: In 1976, the State Legislature passed the Community Health Services Act. The purpose of the act is to develop and maintain a system of community health services under local administration. Community health services are those services provided to protect and improve people's health by preventing illness, disease and disease disability. The Community Health Services Act requires an Advisory Board of Health to advise, consult with, or make recommendations to the Board of Health (City Council) on matters relating to the development, maintenance, funding and evaluation of community health services. Each year the Richfield Advisory Board of Health compiles a summary report of their activities. This information is presented in report form to the Richfield City Council for • their information and acceptance. A copy of the board's annual report is sent to the Minnesota Department of Health after it has been accepted by the Richfield City Council. The Richfield Advisory Board of Health's 1994 Annual Report received approval from the members of the board at their February 27, 1995 meeting. Board members requested that staff place the report on a Council agenda for formal presentation. Recommended Motion: It is recommended that the Richfield City Council accept and approve the Richfield Advisory Board of Health's 1994 Annual Report. Basis for Recommendation: 1. By accepting and approving this report, the City will be in compliance with the section of the State's Local Public Health Act which states that an Advisory Board of Health is to "advise, consult with, and make recommendations to the community health board on matters relating to the development, maintenance, funding and evaluation of community health services. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide not to accept and approve the Richfield Advisory Board of • Health's 1994 Annual Report. This would mean that the City of Richfield would not be in compliance with the requirements of the State's Local Public Health Act. Discussion/Decision Mode: The 1994 Richfield Advisory Board of Health's Annual Report is being presented for City Council acceptance and approval at this time. Respectfull submitted, James . Prosser City Manager JDP:ds • 0 City of Richfield ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH 1994 ANNUAL REPORT Submitted to the Richfield City Council April 3, 1995 Carlene Ulmer, R.N. Chair Richfield Advtsnry Board Mary Jane Markkula, R.N. Vice-Chair Richfield Advisory Board J s City Manager James D. Prosser Mayor Martin Kirsch Council Don Priebe Michael Sandahl Susan Rosenberg Russ Susag April 3, 1995 This report is being submitted to the Richfield City Council as a summary of the activities of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health (RABH) in 1994. It has been another active year for the Board. Much of the work is done by the Board's three workgroups: Addictions, Family Issues and Monitoring Other Issues. Two areas of special focus this year were, smoking prevention and domestic violence prevention. Richfield restaurants were encouraged to become smoke free, and were then recognized for their participation. The addictions • workgroup sponsored a poster project for fifth grade students. The posters publicized D-Day and the adverse effects of smoking. They were displayed by local businesses and participating students received certificates of appreciation from the City Council for their work. The Richfield Coalition Against Family Violence was convened last year by the Family Violence task force of the Family Issues workgroup. The coalition is composed of Richfield citizens and agencies of various backgrounds working together on domestic violence issues. In October, the coalition sponsored a half day workshop on domestic violence for Richfield residents. The coalition also submitted a grant proposal to the Minnesota Department of Education for $3,000. This money will be used to further the work of the coalition. As Chair and Vice Chair of the Board, we are pleased to be a part of this group, and proud of it's accomplishments. Board members are to be commended, along with Richfield staff, Betsy Christensen and Jean Flesher. These accomplishments could not have been achieved without the time, energy, work, and creativeness of board members and Staff. The support and encouragement from the Richfield City Council is also appreciated. • The Urban Hometown An Equal Opportunity Employer It is stated in the mission statement of Community Health Services, "The mission of community health services is to bring people together to create a healthy future for all Minnesotans." So it is the mission of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health to bring people together to create a healthy future for all Richfield residents. Respectfully submitted, 4L&? zevm_? Carlene Ulmer, R.N. Chair Richfield Advisory Board of Health Mary ane Markkula, R.N. Vice-Chair Richfield Advisory Board of Health 1994 WORXGROUPS ADDICTIONS WORKGROUP * Promote Smoke Free Restaurants A letter was sent to all Richfield restaurants encouraging them to become smoke-free. Each facility was then visited by a workgroup member. Restaurants either became, or were currently smoke free. These restaurants were recognized with certificates at.a City Council meeting and an article in the Sun Current. * Letter to Legislators Supporting a Tobacco Tax Increase. A letter was written by a workgroup member and approved by the board. It was then approved by the City Council and sent to State Legislators. * Information Session on Drugs for Senior Citizens. Members sponsored and facilitated two talks on."How to take your prescription drugs." One was given by a pharmacist, and the other by a geriatric nurse specialist at a retirement community. The session at the complex was well attended, and residents asked many questions. *-Smoking/Drug Poster Contest for Elementary Children. Workgroup members worked with Sylvia Stevens (Director of Project Charlie at the Richfield Public Schools) to sponsor a poster project publicizing D-Day and the adverse affects of smoking. The fifth graders made about 55 posters which were then placed by board members in local business windows. Participants were also given certificates of appreciation from the City Council for their participation. FAMILY ISSUES WORKGROUP * Senior Issues A member met with Bloomington Public Health nurses to discuss ways of making their services more available to seniors. Elder abuse was the topic of a breakout session at the domestic violence forum. 4' * Family Violence Members planned, coordinated and facilitated a half day forum entitled "Domestic Violence: How Bad is "It" in Richfield?" The keynote speaker was Sheila Wellstone, a national voice against domestic violence. Many local advocates also participated in the forum. The program and speakers were exceptional, unfortunately it was poorly attended. A grant proposal was written for $3,000 to the Minnesota Department of Education, to further the work of the Richfield Coalition Against Family Violence. * Parenting Issues A breakout session at the domestic violence forum, was; "Emotional Bruises: The effects of growing up in a violent family." This session was led by Debra Goebel, a parent educator from the Richfield/Bloomington Family Center; Ted Gwinn, a social worker from Richfield High School, and Jay Henthorne, Juvenile Investigator/School Liaison. Police Officer. MONITORING OTHER ISSUES WORKGROUP A member represented the Advisory Board at several conferences on Health Care Reform. One was sponsored by YWCA and another by the Minnesota Campaign for Women's Health. Legislation was tracked on health issues and health care reform in the Minnesota House and Senate. When bills were proposed on Advisory Board study subjects, copies of the bills were obtained and distributed to the committees. A student member planned a week of educational activities on AIDS at Richfield High School. SUMMARY OF THE 1994_.RICHFIELD ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH • ACTIVITIES * 10 regular meetings. * 3 new member orientation sessions. * 2 study sessions with the City Council: 1993 Annual Report, and an update of board activities in 1994. * A few members.attended the City Council Meeting with State Legislators. * The board co-sponsored and the Chair co-moderated "A Forum on Health Care", with the League of Women Voters. * Changed the by-laws of the Advisory Board of Health so that chair/vice-chair elections are held in February instead of January. * The Chair and Vice-Chair or designee attended two Board and Commission Chair Meetings. * Recommended, through the City Council, to the Richfield School Board that a dental examination be included in their preschool screening. * New members appointed to the Board: Christopher McHan, Salvador Valdovinos, Laura Holten, Cynthia Dubansky, and Robert See. * Members who resigned/terms expired from the board: Michael Schrenk, Suzette Bechly, Jane Myre. MEETING DATES IN 1994 January 19,1994 February 23, 1994 March- 21, 1994 April 18, 1994 May 16, 1994 - June 20, 1994 July 18, 1994 September 19, 1994 October 17, 1994 November 21, 1994 SPEAKERS IN 1994 * Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Health Administrator. Health services provided by Bloomington and an overview of Minnesota Care. * Steven Sutter, Richfield Fire Marshal. Emergency medical system and 911 video. * Pam Taschuk, Youth Resource Specialist, and Jay Henthorne, Juvenile Liaison Police Officer. Working with juveniles in Richfield. * Diann Kirby, Bloomington Public Health. Vanguard Health Promotion Services, Worksite Wellness. * Petrona Lee, Bloomington Environmental Services-Manager, Paul Alwood, Richfield Restaurant Inspector, Dick Holloway, Senior Environmental Health Specialist/Plan Checker, Bloomington Environmental Health Services. CITY OF RICHFIELD ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH MEMBERSHIP Carlene Ulmer, Chair Provider - Registered Nurse Mary Jane Markkula, Vice Chair Provider - Registered Nurse Kevin Keller Consumer Jean Spencer Consumer Doris Rubenstein Consumer Suzette Bechly Consumer Michael Schrenk Consumer Jo Romer Provider - Registered Nurse Carole Hippie Provider - Therapeutic Recreation Specialist Bill Swanson Consumer Elisa Pluhar High School Student Laura Holten High School Student Christopher McHan Consumer Salvador Valdovinos Provider-Psychologist Cynthia Dubansky Provider-Social Worker Robert See Consumer LIAISON MEMBERS Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor and Richfield City Council Liaison Susan Rosenberg; Richfield City Council Alternate Liaison Betsy Christensen, Richfield City Staff Liaison Gayle Hallin, Bloomington Public Health Liaison ADDICTIONS TASK FORCE Kevin Keller Suzette Bechly Mary Jane Markkula Chris McHan Cynthia Dubansky Elisa Pluhar Laura Holten FAMILY ISSUES TASK FORCE Jean Spencer Jo Romer Carlene Ulmer Carole Hippie Bill Swanson MONITORING OTHER ISSUES TASK FORCE Doris Rubenstein Michael Schrenk 0 i v? Cl) o,E E U y.. O r. O bra y 1- C5 s c O a cts Nc O U ca 00 Rf .U E c* ca a O -cm 0,0 N C O Cu a aca N > a? O m Om aMca OM oC ca >0. 4-0 0 U=fl.C?•_ EECOOo acv ca E O E o Co E O 0.0 mho C tiS N O? Eo a? a 0 0 L>, al E NQj?U•C O w .> O N = ca co 0 mom CO (a N U '- (%S C 00?C0 a O O.C ?,0 -ca CD r- a? v?ai?ooo as 0 0 CO aC co E N > ao cu > •co0 o C Mo cf oaa) U C «6 00 C c U M O 'C co M 0"E z,aE o Es ?. O O O 2:1a ?C 'C co . 0- O C O O O? N0a => o a Co N - ctS C?a Co >Ma O cu Eai 0'a c C to C CO 0 Co > O 00- O 'O F-, v 0 cts C a a? 'C a? Q 0 ?oF VOj U C ctY ca Octswo z 0 `= C ca Qa a? c0 O L.7 O _c 0= O U C co O .N 0 •a _co00_ .0 Ca Ct3 -Q •?- 0 NC C N CO. O O N U O E C O•-L N .D-00 O Co C aWCVO CO O CL c O = N = O O L ?O ¦ (1) 1) 0 2 O 4) Q. IM _ ?.• y Cl) , O E 0 z" O N v _ tai v •- o 0 o VII. A