The URL can be used to link to this page

8-12-96 agenda CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1996 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA INTRODUCTORY PROCEEDINGS CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE (1) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 1996; (2) REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 22,1996; AND (3) CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION OF AUGUST 5, 1996 PRESENTATIONS • 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA AGENDA APPROVAL 2. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR L? 3. CONSENT CALENDAR CONTAINS SEVERAL SEPARATE ITEMS WHICH ARE ACTED UPON BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN ONE MOTION. ONCE THE CONSENT CALENDAR HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE INDIVIDUAL ITEMS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS HAVE ALSO BEEN APPROVED. NO FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS NECESSARY. HOWEVER, ANY COUNCIL MEMBER MAY REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND PLACED ON THE REGULAR AGENDA FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND ACTION. ALL ITEMS LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL. A. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 STATE PRIMARY ELECTION AND NOVEMBER 5, 1996 GENERAL ELECTION C.L. 247 B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZATION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION AND AUTHORIZING PURCHASE ON VOLUNTARY BASIS OF PROPERTY AT 6925 PENN AVENUE C.L. 248 C. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION REGARDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CITY OF RICHFIELD PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT, POLICE DIVISION, PERTAINING TO COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING GRANT PROGRAM C.L. 249 D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR, ITINERANT PLACE OF AMUSEMENT, AND ITINERANT FOOD LICENSES INCLUDING FEE WAIVERS FOR CHURCH OF THE ASSUMPTION FUN FEST ON AUGUST 17 AND 18, 1996 C.L. 250 E. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RENEWAL OF COMMERCIAL KENNEL LICENSE: • AIRPORT PET HOSPITAL, 6301 CEDAR AVENUE C.L. 251 • PET FOOD WAREHOUSE (GROOMING ONLY), 710 WEST 66TH STREET C.L. 252 F. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RENEWAL OF RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE: 7232-11TH AVENUE; FOUR DOGS C.L. 253 • 7600 GRAND AVENUE; FIVE CATS C.L. 254 • 7209-12TH AVENUE; FOUR DOGS C.L. 255 • 7215 VINCENT AVENUE; THREE DOGS C.L. 256 G. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF NEW RESIDENTIAL KENNEL LICENSE: • 6800 CEDAR AVENUE; THREE DOGS C.L. 257 PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OPERATION OF DAY CARE FOR SICK CHILDREN AT 7108 CHICAGO AVENUE COUNCIL LETTER NO. 258 5. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF EXISTING CEMETERY AT CHURCH OF THE ASSUMPTION, 305 EAST 77TH STREET COUNCIL LETTER NO. 259 6. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING REQUEST FOR AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR RICHFIELD STATE AGENCY, 6625 LYNDALE AVENUE, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESSORY BUILDING COUNCIL LETTER NO. 260 RESOLUTION . 7. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF 6758 PORTLAND AVENUE AS POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SITE AREA AT CITY HALL COUNCIL LETTER NO. 261 PROPOSED ORDINANCES 8. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REZONING LAND AT 7645 NICOLLET AVENUE FROM C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL) TO MR-1 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) COUNCIL LETTER NO. 262 9. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT MODIFYING SECTION 1305 OF RICHFIELD CITY CODE DESIGNATING SNOW EMERGENCIES AND AUTHORIZING VEHICLES TO BE TOWED UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS COUNCIL LETTER NO. 263 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS AND OTHER BUSINESS 10. CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RICHFIELD AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (LOGIS) COUNCIL LETTER NO. 264 11. CONSIDERATION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BID PACKAGES #2 THROUGH #4 AND BID PACKAGES #7 THROUGH #10 FOR CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS FOR THE SHOPS AT LYNDALE WINE AND SPIRITS LIQUOR STORE, 7700 LYNDALE AVENUE COUNCIL LETTER NO. 265 AIRPORT BUSINESS 12. AIRPORT STATUS REPORT CORRESPONDENCE 13. LEGISLATIVE REPORT COUNCIL CHOICE 14. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ITEMS 15. CLAIMS AND PAYROLLS 16. ADJOURNMENT 0 Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative Services Director at 861-9702. CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 265 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of bid packages #2 through #4 and #7 through #10 for construction components of the Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits liquor store, 7700 Lyndale Avenue. Background: At the July 8, 1996 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to re-advertise three bid packages and delayed action on four bid packages related to the construction of the Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits, 7700 Lyndale Avenue. Bid packages # 2 through #4 were re-advertised and a public bid opening was held on July 23, 1996. The following bids were submitted by contractors for bid packages #2 through #4. A bid estimate by the construction management firm of Greystone Construction Co. is also noted. Bid Package #2 Cast-In-Place Concrete combined with Bid Package #3 Unit Masonry Northland Concrete & Masonry $270,000 (apparent low bidder) L.S. Black Construction $418,000 Budget Estimate $153,323 Bid Packaae #4 Structural & Miscellaneous Steel Work-Material L.S. Black Construction $106,000 D & M Iron Works $ 61,600 Anderson Iron Works $ 51,512 Twin City Wire $ 48,739 Mannsteadt & Sons $ 42,200 (apparent low bidder) Budget Estimate $ 41,730 Also on July 8, the Council delayed action on bid packages #7 through #10 and instructed staff to discuss alternative design and cost reductions with the lowest bidders. Alternative design has been discussed with some minor cost reductions. However, the project engineers recommend the original design due to City code restrictions and long term advantages. Bid Packaae #7 Plumbing and Related Work MN. Plumbing $ 26,782 McGuire Mechanical $ 26,100 (apparent low bidder) Budget Estimate $ 19,965 If-I Bid Package #8 HVAC and Related Work Grendah Mechanical $ 58,500 Master Mechanical $ 43,600 (apparent low bidder) General Sheet Metal $ 49,870 Budget Estimate $ 30,024 Bid Packaae #9 Fire Protection System Work Midwest Fire Protection $ General Sprinkler $ Viking Automotive Sprinkler $ Ebert & Hinson Fire Protection $ Western States Fire Protection $ Budget Estimate Bid Package #10 Electrical Work Burnsville Electric Electric Service Co. 17,654 (apparent low bidder) 20,170 20,630 21,333 22,740 $ 13,200 $ 54,300 (apparent low bidder) $ 62,700 Budget Estimate $ 39,600 Recommended Motion: The following City Council motion is recommended regarding construction components of the Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits liquor store, 7700 Lyndale Avenue: • Approval of combined bid packages #2 and #3 and award contract to Northland Concrete & Masonry for cast-in-place concrete and unit masonry in amount of $270,000. • Approval of bid package #4 and award contract to Mannsteadt & Sons for structural and miscellaneous steel work-material in amount of $42,200. • Approval of bid package #7 and award of contract to McGuire Mechanical for plumbing and related work in amount of $26,100. • Approval of bid package #8 and award of contract to Master Mechanical for HVAC and related work in amount of $43,600. • Approval of bid package #9 and award of contract to Midwest Fire Protection for fire protection system work in amount of $17,654. • Approval of bid package #10 and award of contract to Burnsville Electric for electrical work in amount of $54,300. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Timing is crucial for an on-schedule construction. 0 2. All low bidders are qualified contractors. 11-D- 9 3. Funds are available for construction of the project. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Council could reject any of the bid packages. However, a November opening is scheduled and re-bidding would significantly delay the project. 2. Council could delay all bids. Again, timing is crucial at this point in the process. Discussion/Decision Mode: Bid packages #2 through #4 and #7 through #10 are placed on the August 12, 1996 agenda for Council action. Respectfully submitted, Jame l. Prosser City Manager JDP:ds 0 • BIDS RECEIVED JUNE 27, 1996, 10;00 AM -- TABULATION SHEET PROOJECT - THE SHOPS AT LYNDALE WINE & SPIRITS PACKAGE # 7 - PLUMBING & RELATED WORK • Bidder Proposal Bid Amount Security McGuire Mechanical 26,100 Yes Minnesota Plumbing & Heating 26,782 Yes Budget Plumbing No bid -- Dakota Plumbing No bid .. Northland Mechanical No bid _ PACKAGE # 8 - HVAC & RELATED WORK Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security Master Mechanical 43,600 Yes General Sheet Metal 49,870 Yes Grendahl Mechanical 58,500 Yes Mechanical Solutions No bid Wenzel Heating No bid - PACKAGE # 9 - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM WORK Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security_ Midwest Fire protection 17,654 Yes General Sprinkler 20,170 Yes Viking Automatic Sprinkler 20,630 Yes Ebert & Hinson Fire Protection 21,333 -:'T Yes Western States Fire Protection 22,740 Yes PACKAGE # 10 -• ELECTRICAL WORK Bidder Proposal Amount Bid 5ccurity Alternate E1, glass block lighting - scheme I Alternate E1, glass block lighting - scheme 2 Burnsville Electric $4,300 Yes No change Add 12,801 Electric Service Company 62,700 Yes Deduct (582) Add 12,700 Master Mechanical No bid - -- .. PACKAGE # 11 - DOORS, FRAMES, FINISH HARDWARE - MATERIAL Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security Contract Hardware Company 3,990 Yes Hauenstein & Burmeister No bid •- K & K Sales No bid -- GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 07/03/96 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Bid Opening July 23, 1996 10:00 a.m. New Municipal Liquor Store Project (Rebid) The Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits Bid No. 96-14 City Project No. 701-1570 Pursuant to requirements of Resolution No. 1015, a meeting of the Administrative Staff was called by Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk, who announced that the purpose of the meeting was to receive, open and read aloud, bids for new municipal liquor store project, Bid No. 96-14, as advertised in the official newspaper on July 10, 1996. Present: William Fillmore, Liquor Operations Director Thomas Ferber, City Clerk Cheryl Krumholz, City Manager Representative Mike Parsons, Construction Manager - Greystone Construction Co. • The following bids were submitted and read aloud: PACKAGE #2 --CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE & RELATED WORK -- PACKAGE 92 --CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE AND PAC:KAGE# 3 - UNIT 10 ASONRY Proposal Bid Alternate Alternate V)61 bid, Amount Security base bid plus NO. 1 No. 1h V;1e no " • Vorthland Concrete & Masonry 270,000 Yes No bid Deduct $261,000 (39,000) L.S. Blacl Construction 418,000 Yes No bid No bid ,Axccl H. (?hntan No bid -- •- -- Crosstown Masonry No bid •- -- -• K &.J Conca'ete & Masonry No bid -- -• -- Wacholz klasonry No bits •- PACKAC;E # 3 - UNIT MASONRY & RELATED "WORK i1-6 Bid Liquor Store 7/23/96 -2- 0 PA KALE # 4 - STRUCTURAL & iIMISCELLA NEOUS S TEEL YORK - MATERJA L Bidder Proposal Did Envy Canopy Decorative Archacquia! Amount Security amo=t ('dill wnotua T: uss amo,tnt included in inct_ded in included in ba+c base bid base bid bid L.S. Black Construction 106,000 Yes - -- Anderson Iron Works 51,512 Yes 5,490 825 D & !vl Iron Works Inc, 61,600 Yes 9,050 1,470 'Mannstedt & Sons, Inc, 42,200 No •- •- in City Wire •• MFI 43,739 Yes 5,523 1,157 The City Clerk announced that the bids would be tabulated and considered at the August 12, 1996 City Council Meeting. Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk • • • RidtifEeld Municipal Liquor St 7700 Lyndolo Avanuo South a D. 1111MATE0 810 E000E7 :T1 MITTED es1tiA1ATED C•xTe "MY.1TED a ioo?s o du.,•noN C0Mtv16T PACK DP1 ITErA <K -pp arent 1011 bade, (Geneses 8 HoRcx mats! w ntlows e R aan :A 3 SAD 3 3 3.A9a E (2,650) AW kD 7- L1_ 12 7 Rolf 20:033 retch 12 7 2,112181,2top of wall 12 1 7 'Roof insulation, v.barner & memOrere S 14,558 $ 17,250 S 5 12 a Aivminum door hardware & opereto:e !S a ALTainutn storafr0.nt & W00c' d 13 8 Glass & g'azing,lnt3rtor S 32;593 $ 33,503 Is $ 14 5 Rough carPentry deaf $ w21 blocking 14 6 Rough Carptnt: tr -roof p 0t,001 14 8 Cas6WOrk 14 $ Fire extinguishers 1d a install doors & hardware 14 8 Toll6t 0cees1orie6 14 f Sealant, masonry control joints S 19 723 5 27.500 S S 27,5[-0 S 7 R (ei root=- E flashing S 15,285 S 19.868 $ $ 19,666 S 4, 15 7 Roo, no. ma 9 115 5 Light gage metal Iraming 16 4 Install frames (gdtywaB 16 9 DrAvall s framing 18 9 D", all & framin9 (n yesti!Kui8 cell 1`14 16 S Ceairlg, aoOuStia21 16 9 ftrnng & gyp t:02r0 42 sxleriar well 15 9 Ex:er)0r well insulation & V8,0f t,;M r S 34,A39 S 28.255 3 ts 5 2?.°3o l & S 18.55[ 5 17 an sea 7 EIFS 1S 9 Concrete floor 8ea* 18 9 Floor coating rQ coo'af, mall. to 13 9 Exterlor painting 18 g Patrt, irteriorws'Is $ 28,295 $ c 18.580 S P< t tl ^k g S 10.070 S 9.521 S 3 <K apparent ww bddn r; leame ; •: ar .ytlmsl: 17,250 S 2,585 COt:NCILAWARD77TH 18 S min 19 9 Carp9t $ c2epet Case (rora on project) IS 9 Vinyl ti10 & vinyl base $ 7,425 $ 5,892 3 S 5,892 S (1 20 9 Hand the 0 tottets 20 8 Entry mat 20 9 Had tfla gy vasttbule. mud set S 4.857 $ 4.820 S S 4.820 S 3 400 S S 3 - 3 jd L? d•^ Inq / •rri5ai'cn « eDD:rent tow yiddv (3•in NW Glissi. COVKCIL $ 907 rw1aRD 7narx endow biiae (i.e. Cites o.ricacnon): L AWARD 7,11156 ant low otga ;ta.p, taeoCOUNCIL 7122!54 a ?• ePporcl t tow Dta:er ti-sq Ihc.)) COUvC1L 144`1 AWARD 7122,'86 «-;petvnt tow elate. (01,-pm''.3 systems): 2761 CCUNCILX,*4Xg07• _•'96 eppartnt tow bta:sr (Sk.':Tent r iin:n91: COUr•CI? <v revtecd ¢Sam_te: pr-pm-ix rceelre'-. COVKCIL ZXVARD 712'-'W to it Pwi Ul=an VT, <.• a;Dieent low sae e, (:r.:.i •a 3rmere): COUttC4 150 AWARD;.'Walt nowtKS by othem 1 2 n _ ap .• x 10 Cock leveler ?? 5 5,300 S 5,500 S ebu4cet a-em-te z 1o Dock curtain & pa( S 5...00 K<bu¢0atestlmite S 1,500 S 15c0 9 1,500 s_ x 10 Ovemaad doer suDIOtet, divrsi0n2 VOUgh iii S 574,134 S 237,286 5 49,1532 $708,918 5 132,7$4 Ye: CrA fee General eond„iors •. a.gv..r» »+ Special conditions w u.ruw vow. s,ibiotal. division 1 Vm gh 18 M1EED310 ae S5e0$21 « 039ld M 38s?k -r..OL'nt t S 29,000 s 32:700 3 - S 49.292 -s -S 49,292 S 10,787 s 3 10,787 S E9a.175 S 286,319 $ 538.511 NEEDS To Be =160,000 <K an Bunt Provided by O%r.' AIF1jF CKS u Architect fee S 30,00 s 30.0-0 Architect site inspection S 15, OM S 15,007 000 S 35 Equipment, refrigar2fon(pr00:;-t o,.Otter) S 35,000 , Equipment shaving 3 10,000 S 10.000 8000 Equipment, 0t,schaut (point Of ulet) R4 S -$,000 Equipment, sianage s 7,000 $ 500 $ 3 Equipment. comrur:..cations $ 3,500 , 500 3 2 Squipment, etarm (intrusion, r.ra suop,s $ 2,5.0 , Equ:pmera, Surveillance system $ 5,000 S 5,000 Equipment, Point of sale regiSW$ S 8,000 3 8,000 Ulacktop, landscaping I irrigation $ $ 000 S 2 Equipment, MU (o'.fice e0., carts, ).nit 2.000 175 3 122 , 3 331.919 $ d17,511 Grand totat, . rovlded by Owner S 29,000 S - (per amokaht Cr:ooSi:J 49,292 S « estmate (Per am-tone prosa"e" _3__i0,787 S « extirpate (per G •eysxne pmpos sr, 3 522.830 126,855 nt?gr0;20 30.000h - «"mountprovd<d"our" 15,0 S - x{•? 35,000 + ILK a 000 S - KK nOtlnelaC¢4:n d1 iAtk-te Z: tO 71000 5 « ¢mbunt Pra"ecs D Cwner, I42r=` 0::29 3 S «•• 2,500 S 5,000 •- ,WD S Ki-• _ S t< by otters e mn .. - tt -mount Oroviced 2,7 Owner, AIP"a; 09.79 p,p, auJoe! I COMMtttt a ESTIMATED UN. ESTIMATED / i / I ? 91D RAGX rreM < ( TOTAL orv TO GATE a COMMITT= r 100'x, DEVIATION ( W COMMSNT o s? 1 5 Sir Jotbt <e sworn ra Arenna1rd13 yen: eKDS; GaCtneNe uncorrAiea ernoud :a (ar n.ewe Iesr ie•st Oyer CP ecR 5 Mctpldeck S t5,81? 5 12,200 S 1.800 S 14,000 $ (1,817) outore&. RFP 1 3 Concrete precast pta..k. a' S 20,020 $ 17.240 $ 17,240 S (21P011 «awnrd to Molle Concrete 07r9e 2 3 Concrete foopn93, continuous 2 3 Commie footings. c4;u in 2 3 QACrele rainforcamtant - 60,:ded 2 3 Concrete stab on grade 2 3 Concrete topping, 2" 2 3 Corwele Q dock. 8" CIP wall 2 3 CenCrelc Q eereerwali, Con.':ete Cap 2 3 Concrete ! stair tread 2 7 Insulation ® cooler floor, d' 3 v b. <e Sec BF 3 tut awrbinad a9 2 t 3 bid, arnoJrt •aCcated 1, the esar, itea ocr:en ter tansste war; induded in to cotroined car-c-Ce 3 rr fia" Did. Gea+tern Maaenry w'blrec bp 2 e d 1:14 Is 323S'90 2 7 Foundation ir°,sulation $ A8.426 $ 46,000 $ 46,003 S (4251 &D R=JECTED BY COUNCIL 7r3; REBID 7122-19! r 3 4 hiaaonry. CMU, 0e10'M grade. 12'• 3 4 Caro 511, 12" 3 4 Masonry, CIVIL) 8" 3 4 Core ill, 8" 3 4 M96onry, 0*ick 3 4 Mfasonry, aluminum„ flashing 3 4 w,93onry, rock faca. color - stswera a 3 - Lintel, set $1801 linteis 3 4 In tail ecarfra.-e3 in cone 8 CiAU 3 r-eundst cn wa!arproofu-g •t tomb::ey Sp 2 a b fCresstown Macon»y;tnanrq 5206.943, 810 REJECTED BY CCUNC;L 786, REBID :: 2&3 713100. Nortiane Co-4-14 oo,",Aned bid 3 4 C;;Fastbtk 3`08.897 S 5215.000 5215.000 S108,103 i-YtaS291000 4 5 Stsirs. Interior, P treads 4 d Stair. to rcaf 4 5 Handrail 4 5 L cc&e lintei9 4 6 8te61 grille & canopy 0 er.;ry 4 Tntasas, tuha stect ec appare'ltlow bidder (.iuesvl irtl,, $61.:36, BID P,SJECTtC 5Y COUNCIL?;'., a931D 7r13. 614anstea 4 Stru:tura( s!ee-I:CGlu.^•tnsibEa?sflimsis S 41,730 3 42,200 S 42,200 5 470 9ttel aouerent low t:iddtr(wio lie ccc%:i>r) 5 1 ^ jrJQ 5 S;ss• cmctlcn 3 -, S 15,178 $ 18,178 S 3.518 ao",nnt low Sidder (Weeta•T $teei Erection) 6 2 Curb 6 2 Excavation 8 bacWili 6 2 Excavation & haul off-site 6 : Grading, lot 6 2 Foundation drin - 6 2 Pavement, stone l:aso & striping - 8 2 Sidewalk & Sits conc. a 2 Storm sewer G doctt drain 6 2 Constriction fence 8 2 Gas service, by M,irnegesco E 2 Sanitary sewer «eepnentlewbldder(Nor?wtalAsphek),COUNCIL 6 2 Mier dlstnbudon S 42,899 $ 39,030 S S 39,030 S (3,8£3) AV; aD 7:6 7 1 15 Plumbing a.rx,inc:ud.n9lnt.roc, trains 5 19.0165 S 2;3,;00_ S 28,100 S 6,135 e<appal entlowbddtr(MeCni6Ma&orod) g 16 HVAC, uppw loyal 8 15 WAC, io,"r tavsl! back of house 024 S 30 £00 S 43 600 S 43 S 13,578 «aCDarerS low bidder (;dealer t,teutenlwti 8 , 15 To'Nat exraust , , 3 13 200 664 S 17 S 17,854 $ 4,454 <eepaerer(low b'rdtr!MidwWF.:t Prtittean) 9 , 15 Fireoroteetion , 10 16 Electric service 10 16 Li9Ming, uppar ievcl 10 18 Liafaing, ICwor lay-ml, sirlo fluorescent 10 16 Lighting, exterior, btiiifr>3 mounted 10 18 Power, gsneral 10 15 Power, equipment =00 300 3 54 300 $ 54 S 14,700 '•aapDarentlow bidocr(SurrsvibeEitcrel 10 18 Communication, raceway 3 39. , , :1 8 Doors, harries & finl9h hfts, - extanCr 11 8 Dcor3, fragss & finO hdwe - interior e• 0 • 07/LL/96 10 0 f. .1 t)t.. u r 4t.:a 44 41°11 1 S-5o - 8215 Q g RySTONE CONSTRPLC11 N COMPANY W LL 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110, Shakopee, MN $5379 612 496.2227 445-4191 fax fll ? Date: 07/19/96 2 pages sent To: Mike Woehrle and Andrew Erdmann, Nelson - Rudie & Associates 647-4120 fax Front: Mike Parsons Re: The Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits, 7700 Lyndale Avenue South Cost Savings Ideas / Engineer Recommendation Please review and provide a recommendation for the following cost savings items. The items were developed with your input and by the apparent low bidders. J Firm 1 NW Fire Protection 2 NW Fire Protection 3 NW Fire Protection Item Provide standard sprinkler heads, in lieu of dry pendant heads @ cooler ( 400) Move fire department connection to south side of ( 400) building, delete 4" pipe run. Recommend Proposed For Saving Acceptance • Atec#ftp Alp- PROM I' U.aw Ppmwo?* D Waive requirement for engineers stamp ( 250) 4 NW Fire Provide surface mount Siamese fitting, in lieu of ( 200) Protection flush type 5 NW Fire Delete 5' of underground piping work in fire ( 800) Protection protection scope, utility contractor to bring underground into building c+I.r ?? o ju-.*iNtr A SRVOMotJ P94"; A6 v&G' fir MV9'& R(-T- .. %commulwo htt rpVtA Twulak itw". ?? fp rrl n'Ibw D /}6c.8P'T'i? ! ' itbe? (Tem. too "uT'L' coYrS 6ro up'? I'. 6 Master Provide (2) standard package heat / cool BTU's (6,345) - -rK """t N UEro 5 j l To Mhf-e 7'4S Mechanical in lieu of specified BTU's Ne 01.0 OJIw Fl6crl7o/LE wE wO U UD f Ad0100 j H}vm10174 (.dtiTTOL4?; • 10 'd 16Ti,Stib 07/22/98 15:57 FAX 612 647 4120 NELSON A11111 L' IA 002/002 7 Master Provide (2) ceiling exhaust fans with sidewall ( 700) Mechanical hood in lieu of (1) PRV and duct system. Delete (1) break room PRV & duct system. paqsI 14-6 8 McGuire Delete interior roof drainage system & provide (2,420) uP o,a rjaac * °A gua-011-4' miril W . oc wAwr Mechanical roof scuppers e 9 McGuire Provide tank type toilets & revise water main ( 360); r0m)V45 °o NOT OUT w81tFFi ?Dvhr?TJK?' ? Mechanical from 2" to 11/411 ???µo? 1e c Lt?P? o Nc,r ? . D 10 McGuire Delete floor drain and sanitary sewer sump pump ( 200) W)N4c, 0e Nor 60411 Avvftor er- iow1^tT Mechanical in basement. Provide two floor drains @ cooler OtUt,w 1P 0/rVMVVr ; 00 AnT AvAPP7 11 Burnsville Revise type A, A1, 2, X & X1 light fixtures per (3,150) -Np8 A pB9f0Kmfr$jYE Electric Graybar fax dated 7/18/96 (A copy of the 's At-48Pr ' LZ 4LT information was faxed to N-R 7/18/96) Be m? ?i nr ?;PT1Nk , 1C6»7?Jt r+vt? (15,225) rr?X7uel»' rte • If possible please provide feedback on the feasibility of the items on Monday July 22 c Gary Fischer, Tushie Montgomery Zo ld 16T CONSTRUCTION COMPANY July 31, 1996 Mr. William F. Fillmore, Owner's Representative & Liquor Operations Director City of Richfield 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423-2599 Re: The Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits 7700 Lyndale Avenue South, Richfield, MN Dear Bill: Rebids for a portion of the work, designated as bid packages 2, 3 and 4 bids were received on July 23, 1996. Rebids were received, publicly opened and read in Council Chambers. A bid tabulation sheet is attached. The original bids for packages 2, 3 and 4 were received June 27. We recommend the award of bid packages as indicated below. • The City Council tabled action on the award of bid packages 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 at the July 8 Council meeting. Following the meeting cost reduction items were developed by the Project Team. The items ranged from revising the type of Siamese fire protection fire department fitting (a $200 savings) to specifying alternate HVAC equipment (a savings of $6,345, which reduces the Owners ability to control humidity in the space.) After discussion with you, the cost saving for items may have a long term negative effect on the durability, aesthetics and revenue generating potential of the facility. We recommend that none of the cost reduction items be considered at this time. We recommend the award of bid packages as indicated below. Bid Bid Budget Package Description Lowest Responsive Bidder Amount Estimate Comment 2&3 Cast In Place Concrete Northland Concrete & $261,000 $153,323 The original low & Unit Masonry Work Masonry, Co., Burnsville, MN bidder on June 27 (REBID) decided not to rebid on July 23; Package rebid w/o screen wall work. 4 Structural & Misc. Steel Mannstedt & Son, Inc. 42,200 41,730 Package rebid based Material (REBID) Roseville, MN on a redesigned trusses over sales counter 5 Steel Erection Work Western Steel Erection Inc., 16,178 12,500 Long Lake, MN A-P11 1221 East Fourth Avenue, Suite 110 Equal Opportunity Telephone: 612-496-2227 Shakopee Minnesota 55379 Employer/Contractor Fax : 612-445-4191 The Shops at Lyndale Wine & Spirits Award Recommendation Letter July 31, 1996 • • 7 Plumbing Work McGuire Mechanical, Lakeville, MN 8 HVAC Work Master Mechanical, Inc., Bloomington, MN 9 Fire Protection Work Midwest Fire Protection Inc., Minneapolis, MN 10 Electrical Work Burnsville Electric, Burnsville. MN Bid Bid Budget Package Description Lowest Responsive Bidder Amount Estimate Comment Call me should you have any questions. Sincerely, ?- MikI J. (Mike) Parsons Project Manager c: Gary Tushie w/ tabulation sheet Rob O'Brien w/ tabulation sheet Attachment -- tabulation sheet & copy of proposals received 26,100 19,965 43,600 30,024 17,654 13,200 54,300 39,600 E 0 BIDS RECEIVED JULY 23, 1996, 10:00 AM (REBID)-- TABULATION SHEET PROJECT - THE SHOPS AT LYNDALE WINE & SPIRITS PACKAGE #2 --CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE & RELATED WORK • Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security Axcel H. Ohman No bid -- Crosstown Masonry No bid -- K & J Concrete & Masonry No bid L.S. Black Construction No bid -- Northland Concrete & Masonry No bid -- Wacholz Masonry No bid -- PACKAGE # 3 - UNIT MASONRY & RELATED WORK Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security Axcel H. Ohman No bid - Crosstown Masonry No bid -- K & J Concrete & Masonry No bid L.S. Black Construction No bid -- Northland Concrete & Masonry No bid -- Wacholz Masonry No bid -- COMBINED -- PACKAGE #2 --CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE AND PACKAGE# 3 - UNIT MASONRY III-la Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security Alternate NO. 1 Alternate NO. 2 Total bid, base bid plus altemate no. 2 Northland Concrete & Masonry 270,000 Yes No bid Deduct ($9,000) $261,000 L.S. Black Construction 418,000 Yes No bid No bid Axcel H. Ohman No bid -- - -- Crosstown Masonry No bid -- -- -- K & J Concrete & Masonry No bid -- -- -- Wacholz Masonry No bid -- -- -- PACKAGE # 4 - STRUCTURAL & MISCELLANEOUS STEEL WORK - MATERIAL Bidder Proposal Amount Bid Security Entry Canopy amount included in base bid Decorative Grill amount included in base bid Architectural Truss amount included in base bid L.S. Black Construction 106,000 Yes -- -- Anderson Iron Works 51,512 Yes 5,490 825 D & M Iron Works Inc. 61,600 Yes 9,050 1,470 Mannstedt & Sons, Inc. 42,200 No -- Twin City Wire -- WI 48,739 Yes 5,523 1,157 -- c: Nancy Stroth & Bill Filhnore, City of Richfield; Gary Tushie, Tushie Montgomery GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 08/01/96 . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 264 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: City Council approval of an agreement between the City and Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS) titled, Joint and Cooperative Agreement. Local Government Information Systems. Background: The Public Safety Department utilizes computerized systems for maintaining police records and for 911 dispatching (CAD). The current records and CAD systems were purchased by the City from Cantus Corporation, which was subsequently acquired by Teledent Corporation. Teledent Corporation has suspended its involvement in the police records and CAD market and no longer supports existing systems. The Public Safety Department must immediately replace these systems. Related to this issue is the consideration of alternative 911 dispatch options by the City. Although the 911 dispatch discussions are currently suspended, the final decision could be the transfer of 911 dispatch operations to another Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP), such as Hennepin County Communications Center. If this were to occur, the • City would need only to replace the police records system, but not the CAD system. LOGIS will provide the Public Safety Department with (1) police records and CAD computer applications running on LOGIS owned hardware; (2) technical and software support; and, (3) network services such as mail and other network interconnections on an annual, fee for service basis. Recommended Motion: It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement between the City and Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS). Basis of Recommendation: 1. An annual, fee for service agreement provides the City with the flexibility needed to accommodate either the continued operation of an independent 911 PSAP or the transfer of those functions to another PSAP. If the City's PSAP were to close, LOGIS CAD service would be discontinued and the annual fee would be reduced. The LOGIS fee for service for both CAD and police records is expected to be $3,124 per month for 1996 and 1997. 2. This agreement does not require the significant capital purchase by the City that an "in house" system would require. The current estimate of the cost of an "in house" system is $250,000. I() _, 3. The annual fee for service agreement with LOGIS will include network access services that would otherwise require significant additional hardware and fees if added to an "in house" system. 4. Utilizing LOGIS services will provide a very rapid transition off of the City's current, unsupported system. The purchase of an "in house" system would require the development of a very detailed Request For Proposal and the time delay of a bid process and award. 5. The police records and CAD systems provided by LOGIS have been evaluated by managers, communications dispatchers, and police records personnel of the Public Safety Department and the consensus is that the LOGIS systems meet all of Public Safety's needs. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Develop an RFP and open a bid process with the intent to purchase an "in house" system at approximately $250,000. Discussion/Decision Mode: City Council approve the agreement between the City and Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS). • ResDectfuRv submitted, James rosser City Manager JDP:ds 0 J July 23, 1996 / -J?- Richfield Public Safety 6700 Portland Avenue .Richfield, Minnesota 55423-2599 City Manager Mayor .;amps D. Prosser Martin Kirsch Council Don Priebe Michael Sandahl Susan Rosenberg Russ Susag Mr. Mike Garris, Executive Director Local Government Information Systems Association (LOGIS) 2700 Freeway Boulevard Suite 300 Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Dear Mr. Garris: • The Public Safety Department of the City of Richfield is hereby applying for membership in LOGIS at the Operations Associate,level.. The Public Safety Department would like to utilize the police records and CAD applications available through LOGIS, as well as other network services such as Internet and mail server, access. This matter will be presented to the Richfield City Council on August 12, 1996, requesting authorization to immediately enter into a joint powers agreement between the City of Richfield and LOGIS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. If you need additional information, please contact Deputy Director Vaughn Lambert (861-9820) or vlambert@minn.net) who will be acting as liaison for the City on this matter. Sincerely, .._ John D. Erskine Director of Public Safety JDE:Imv • The Urban Hometown Non-emergency (24 hr.) General City Matters POLICE/FIRE/EMERGENCY (612)861-9800 612)861-9700 DIAL 911 An Pniial nnnrlitnihi Pmnlnvcr MEMORANDUM x 0 Date: July 23, 1996 • To: Captain Vaughn Lambert, Richfield Public Safety From: Chris Norton, LOGIS Application Suppo Subject: LOGIS Police Application Support Charges for 996/1997 /0-3 As requested at our meeting of July 19, here are the application support charges Richfield will be billed for use of the police application. Billing begins the first full month in which LOGIS is providing conversion/implementation services. Based on the current schedule, billing is expected to begin September, 1996. 1996 LO I Charges September - December CAD RECORDS TOTAL Month/Annual Month/Annual Month/Anneal Application Support •$1,130/$4,520. $1,529/$6,116 $2,659/$10,636 Disk Space $ 200/$ 800 $ 200/$ 800 $ 400/$ 1,600 Frame Relay Charge $ 651$ 260 TOTAL $1,330/$5,320 $1,729/$6,916 $3,124/$12,496 1997 LOGIS Charges CAD RECORDS TOTAL Month/Annual Month/Annnai Month/Annnol • Application Support $1,130/$13,560 $1,529/$18,348 $2,659/$31,908FM Disk Space $ 200/$ 2,400 $ 200/$ 2,400 $ 400/$ 4,800 Frame Relay Charge $ 65/$ 780 Systems Development $ 0/$ 3,644 TOTAL $1,330/$15,960 $1,729/$209748 $3,124/$41,132 If you have any questions regarding the LOGIS costs, please don't hesitate to call me. We look forward to working with Richfield on the implementation of the police records and CAD software. cc: Sally Morton, Richfield Julie Groenke, LOGIS RIPOL$$. DOC JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (Originally dated May 1, 1972) (Amended, effective December 3, 1993) The parties to this agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota. This agreement is made and entered into pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. I. GENERAL PURPOSE The general purpose of this agreement is to provide for an organization through which the parties may jointly and cooperatively provide for the establishment, operation and maintenance of data processing facilities and management information systems for the use and benefit of the parties and others. II. DEFINITION OF TERMS Section 1. For the purpose of this agreement, the terms defined in this article shall have the meanings given them. Section 2. "Local Government Information Systems" means the organization created pursuant to this agreement,- which organization is hereafter referred to as "LOGIS." Section 3. "Board" means the Board of Directors of LOGIS, consisting of one director from each governmental unit which is a member of LOGIS. Section 4. "Council"-means the governing body of the member governmental unit, except that in the case of any department or agency of the state, council shall be deemed to mean the Commissioner of Administration of the State of Minnesota. Section 5. "Member" means a governmental unit which enters into this agreement and is, at the time involved, a party in good standing. Section borough, too Minnesota or Section user manuals Section of LOGIS. DJK62837 LG100-2 6. "Governmental unit" means any city, village, rn or other political subdivision of the State of any department or agency of the state government. 7. "Software" means computer programs, form designs, and associated documentation. III. MEMBERSHIP 1. Any governmental unit is eligible to be a member 1 s • Section 2. A governmental unit desiring to be a member shall execute a copy of this agreement and shall pay the established membership dues and charges. Section 3. The initial members shall be those members who joined LOGIS on or prior to June 1, 1972. Section 4. Governmental units joining LOGIS after June 1, 1972, shall be admitted only upon the favorable vote of two-thirds of the members of the board. The board may impose conditions upon the admission of members other than the initial members. IV. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Section 1. The governing body of LOGIS shall be its board. Each member shall be entitled to one director, who shall have one vote. Section 2. Each member shall also be entitled to one alternate director who shall be entitled to attend meetings of the board and who may vote in the absence of the member's director. Section 3. Directors and alternate directors shall be appointed by the council of each member. In order for LOG IS to develop data processing and management information systems which will be of maximum value to member governmental units, the members • shall appoint, as their directors and alternates, their chief administrative officers and employees with general management responsibilities. Directors and alternates shall serve without compensation from LOGIS but this shall not prevent a member from providing compensation for its director or alternate director if such compensation is authorized by such unit and by law. Section 4. There shall be no voting by proxy, but all votes must be cast in person at board meetings by the director or his alternate. Section 5. Directors and alternate directors shall be appointed to serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. Section 6. When the council of a member appoints a director or an alternate director, it shall give notice of such appointment to LOGIS in writing. Such notice shall include the mailing address of the persons so appointed. The names and addresses shown on such notices may be used as the official names and addresses for the purposes of giving any notices required by this agreement or by the bylaws of LOGIS. Section 7. Any director or alternate director shall be subject to removal by the council of the member appointing him, at • any time, with or without cause. =62837 Lcloo-2 2 • Section 8. A majority of the votes of the members shall constitute a quorum of the board. Section 9. A vacancy on the board shall be filled by the council of the member whose position on the board is vacant. Section 10. A director (or his alternate) shall not be eligible to vote on behalf of his governmental unit during the time that such governmental unit is in default on any contribution to LOGIS or on any contract with it. During the existence of such default, the vote or votes of such governmental unit shall not be counted as eligible votes for the purposes of this agreement. If a governmental unit remains in default for a period of more than 45 days on any billing from LOGIS, the membership of such governmental unit automatically shall be terminated. V. MEETINGS - ELECTION OF OFFICERS Section 1. Any governmental unit desiring to enter into this agreement may do so by the duly authorized execution of a copy of this agreement by its proper officers. Thereupon, the clerk or other corresponding officer of the governmental unit shall file a duly executed copy of the agreement, together with a certified copy of the authorizing resolution or other action, with the city manager of the City of Brooklyn Center. The resolution authorizing the execution of the agreement shall also designate the first . director and alternate for the member. The agreement shall become effective when it has been authorized by ten (10) governmental units and when executed copies from such governmental units, together with certified copies of the authorizing resolutions, have been duly filed as set out herein. Within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this agreement, the manager of the City of Brooklyn Center shall call the first meeting of the board, which shall be held not later than fifteen (15) days thereafter. Section 2. At the first meeting of the board and in July of each even numbered year after 1972, the board shall elect from its directors a president, a vice-president and a secretary-treasurer. Section 3. At the organizational meeting, or as soon thereafter as it may reasonably be done, the board shall adopt bylaws governing its procedures including the time, place and frequency of its regular meetings. Such bylaws may be amended from time to time. Regular public meetings of the board, however, shall be held at least quarterly in the months of January, April, July and October. Section 4. Special meetings of the board may be called (a) by the president, (b) by the executive committee or (c) by the executive committee upon the written request of a majority of the directors. Five days' written notice of special meetings shall be • given to the directors and alternates. Such notice shall include the agenda for the special meeting. WK62837 LG100-2 3 • Section 5. The specific date, time and location of regular and special meetings of the board shall be determined by the executive committee. Regular and special meetings of the board shall be held in the seven county twin city metropolitan area. Section 6. Notice of regular meetings of the board shall be given to the directors and alternates by the secretary-treasurer of the board at least fifteen (15) days in advance and the agenda for such meetings shall accompany the notice. However, business at regular meetings of the board need not be limited to matters set forth in the agenda. VI. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD Section 1. The powers and duties of the board shall include the powers set forth in this article. Section 2. It shall take such action as it deems necessary and appropriate to accomplish the general purposes of the organization including the establishment of data processing and information systems, engaging in the development and implementation of the necessary programs therefor, acquiring any necessary site, purchasing any necessary supplies, equipment and machinery, employing any necessary personnel and operating and maintaining any systems for the handling of data processing and management information for the members and for others. Any of the foregoing activities, or any other activities authorized by this agreement, may be accomplished by entering into contracts, leases or other agreements with others, whenever the board shall deem this to be advisable. Section 3. The board shall have full control and management of the affairs of LOGIS including the power to make contracts as it deems necessary to make effective any power to be exercised by LOGIS pursuant to this agreement; to provide for the prosecution and defense or other participation in actions or proceedings at law in which it may have an interest; to employ such persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its duties and powers on a full-time, part-time or consulting basis; to conduct such research and investigation as it deems necessary on any matter related to or affecting the general purposes of the organization; to acquire, hold and dispose of property both real and personal as the board deems necessary; and to contract for space, materials, supplies and personnel either with a member or with a number of members or elsewhere. Section 4. It may establish and collect membership dues. Section 5. It may establish and collect charges for its services to members and to others. Section 6. It may accept gifts, apply for and use grants or loans of money or other property from the state, or any other governmental units or organizations and may enter into agreements WX62837 Lcloo-2 4 . required in connection therewith and may hold, use and dispose of such moneys or property in accordance with the terms of the gift, grant, loan or agreement relating thereto. Section 7. It shall cause an annual independent audit of the books to be made and shall make an annual financial accounting and report in writing to the members. Its books and records shall be available for and open to examination by its members at all reasonable times. Section 8. It shall establish the annual budget for the organization as provided in this agreement.' Section 9. It may delegate authority to the executive committee of the board, between board meetings. Such delegation of authority shall be by resolution of the board and may be conditioned in such manner as the board may determine. Section 10. It may accumulate and maintain reasonable working capital reserves and may invest and reinvest funds not currently needed for the purposes of the organization. Such investment and reinvestment shall be in accordance with and subject to the laws applicable to the investment of village funds. Section 11. It shall make its data processing and management information systems available to its members, subject to reasonable • charges for the development and processing thereof. Section 12. It may pay. the reasonable and necessary expenses of officers, directors and alternates incurred in connection with their duties as such, but this shall not include the expenses of attending meetings of LOGIS within the seven county twin city metropolitan area. Section 13. It may provide for any of its employees to be members of the Public Employees Retirement Association and may make any required employer contributions to that organization and any other employer contributions which municipalities are authorized or required by law to make. Section 14. It may purchase public liability insurance and such other bonds or insurance as it may deem necessary. Section 15. It may exercise any other power necessary and incidental to the implementation of its powers and duties. VII. OFFICERS Section 1. The officers of the board shall consist of a president, a vice-president and a secretary-treasurer who shall be elected at the regular annual meeting of the board held in even . numbered years after 1972. New officers shall take office at the adjournment of the annual meeting of the board at which they are elected. =62837 Lcloo-2 5 1®-- 9 Section 2. A vacancy shall immediately occur in the office of any officer upon his resignation, death or upon his ceasing to be an employee of his member governmental unit. Upon vacancy occurring in any office, the executive committee shall fill such position until the next meeting of the board. Section 3. The three officers shall all be members of the executive committee. Section 4. The president shall preside at all meetings of the board and the executive committee. The vice-president shall act as president in the absence of the president. Section 5. The secretary-treasurer shall be responsible for keeping a record of all of the proceedings of the board and executive committee, for custody of all funds, for the keeping of all financial records of the organization and for such other matters as shall be delegated to him by the board. Any persons may be engaged to perform such services under his supervision and direction, when authorized by the board. He shall post a fidelity bond or other insurance against loss of organization funds in an amount approved by the board, at the expense of the organization. VIII. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Section 1. The board shall have an executive committee consisting of three officers and two other directors, all of whom shall be elected at the annual meetings of the board held in even numbered years after 1972. Vacancies of members on the executive committee may be filled by the board of directors at any regular or special meeting. Section 2. The executive committee may adopt bylaws governing its own procedures, which shall be subject to this agreement, the bylaws of the board, and any resolutions or other directives of the board. Section 3. A quorum at a meeting of the executive committee is three (3). Section 4. The executive committee shall meet at the call of the president or upon the call of any two other members of the executive committee. The date and place of the meeting shall be fixed by the person or persons calling it. At least forty-eight (48) hours' advance written notice of such meeting shall be given to all members of the executive committee by the person or persons calling the meeting. Such notice, however, may be waived by any or all members who actually attend the meeting or who give written waiver of such notice for a specified meeting. Section 5. The executive committee shall have the following duties: DJK62837 L0100-2 /0-10 (a) It shall exercise the powers and perform the duties delegated to it by the board of directors, subject to such conditions and limitations as may be imposed by the board. (b) It shall cause to be prepared a proposed annual budget each year which shall be submitted to the board of directors at least thirty (30) days before the annual meeting. (c) It shall present a full report of its activities at each regular meeting of the board. Section 6. Subject to the provisions of the approved budget it shall have the authority to appoint, fix the conditions of employment of, and remove any employees of the organization. Section 7. It shall have authority to fix charges for the use of the programs and facilities of LOGIS, both as to members and nonmembers consistent with policies and guidelines established by the board. Section 8. All actions taken by the executive committee shall be subject to control by the board of directors as the board shall deem advisable. IX. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 1. The fiscal year of LOGIS shall be the calendar 0 year. Section 2. The annual budget of LOGIS must be adopted in the following manner: (a) annually prior to June 1 the Board will supply each member with a proposed preliminary budget; (b) annually prior to the annual meeting of the Board in July the Board will supply each member with a proposed budget adjusted for withdrawal notifications received pursuant to Article XII; (c) the annual budget must be adopted at the annual meeting of the Board in July. Promptly after adoption of the budget, the Board must mail copies of the budget to the chief administrative officer of each member. Upon adoption of the budget each member is obligated to LOGIS for the budgeted revenues and cost sharing charges fixed by the Board for the ensuing fiscal year in accordance with this Article. (Amended by Amendment No. 1, December.3, 1993.) Section 3. The board shall have authority to fix cost sharing charges for all members in an amount sufficient to provide the funds required by the budgets of the organization. It shall advise the chief administrative officer of each member, on or before DJX62837 LG100-2 7 l l? • September 1 of each year, of the amounts of such charges falling within Classes 1 and 2 and the rates of such charges falling within Class 3, as such classes are defined in Section 5 of this article. Section 4. Billings for all charges shall be made by the board and shall be due when rendered. Any member whose charges have not been paid within 45 days after billing shall be in default and shall not be entitled to further voting privileges nor to have its director hold any office nor to use any LOGIS facilities or programs until such time as no longer in default. In the event that such charges have not been paid within 45 days after such billing, such defaulting member shall be deemed to have given, on such 45th day, notice of withdrawal from membership. In the event of a bona fide dispute between the member and the board as to the amount which is due and payable, the member shall nevertheless make such payment in order to preserve its status as a member, but such payment may be made under protest and without prejudice to its right to dispute the amount of the charge and to pursue any legal remedies available to it. Section 5. The charges of LOGIS shall be divided, for cost sharing purposes, into three classes, to-wit: (a) Class 1 Charges. These charges shall be made to cover the organization's general, administrative and operational expenses not falling within Classes 2 and 3. is Class 1 charges shall be made as fixed monthly, quarterly or annual membership dues. They shall be determined annually by the board of directors. They shall not be retroactively applied to new members. (b) Class 2 Charges. These charges shall be made to cover the costs of design and development of computer programs and systems and other capital costs. The initial members of LOGIS shall pay such portion of the Class 2 charges as shall be established by the board, provided that the board shall attempt in good faith to pro rate such Class 2 charges among the members in as equitable a manner as possible, giving consideration, among other things, to anticipated use of the programs, systems and facilities of the organization. Any new members, i.e. any governmental units joining LOGIS after May 31, 1972, shall pay a pro rated share of the accumulated Class 2 charges which have been charged to or incurred by all members, as computed by the board on the same formula as for initial members as the price of membership; and such charges, when paid by such new members, shall be apportioned among the then existing members in cash or credit on unpaid or future billings in proportion to the Class 2 charges which such existing members have thus far paid or incurred. (c) Class 3 Charges. These charges shall be to cover the costs of system operation and maintenance in serving members (and others) on a "as requested" basis. The amount of such charges shall be determined by the board and such amounts DJX62837 LG100-2 8 l0 f- /ca shall be computed on the basis of the actual workload utilized by each member. Class 3 charges shall not be retroactively applied to new members. Section 6. Nothing contained in the foregoing Section 5 shall prevent the board from charging nonmembers for services rendered by LOGIS, on such basis as the board shall deem appropriate. For example, the board shall not be obligated to charge nonmembers, for services, only Class 3 charges. Section 7. It is anticipated that certain members may be in a position to extend special financial assistance to LOGIS in the form of grants. The board may credit any such grants against any charges which the granting member would otherwise have to pay. The board may also enter into an agreement, as a condition to any such grant, that it will credit all or a portion of such grant towards charges which have been made or in the future may be made against one or more specified members. Section 8. Board funds may be expended by the board in accordance with procedures established by law for the expenditure of funds by villages. Orders, checks, drafts and other legal instruments shall be signed by the president or vice-president and countersigned by the secretary-treasurer or such other person as shall be designated by the board. Section 9. Contracts shall be let and purchases shall be made in accordance with the legal requirements applicable to contracts .and purchases by Minnesota villages. X. ADMINISTRATOR An administrator may be 'appointed to perform such administrative duties as shall be delegated to him by the board. XI. ASSOCIATES Section 1. It is contemplated that certain governmental units may desire to follow, closely, the activities of LOGIS, to provide input into systems design, and to receive detailed information about system characteristics and performance, for the purpose of coordinating intergovernmental relationships. Such governmental units may affiliate with LOGIS as "associates." Section 2. A governmental unit desiring to become an associate may do so in the same manner as is applicable to becoming a member, except as otherwise provided in this article. Section 3. At the time of joining LOGIS as an associate, the governmental unit shall indicate in writing that it is not joining as a member but as an associate. Section 4. An associate may appoint a director and an alternate director to the board but such director (or alternate) DJX62837 LG100-2 9 /0-Is . shall be without voting power, shall not be eligible to serve as an officer and shall not be counted for quorum purposes. Section 5. The board may establish the charges to be paid by associates and for that purpose it may classify associates in accordance with their varying circumstances. Section 6. An associate may apply for membership status and become a regular member. Section 7. An associate may discontinue its association with LOGIS at any time by giving written notice of withdrawal to the secretary-treasurer of LOGIS. Withdrawal shall not relieve such withdrawing associate from its obligation to pay any charges which the associate has incurred up to the time of withdrawal. XII. WITHDRAWAL Section 1. Any member may at any time give written notice of withdrawal from LOGIS. The nonpayment of charges as set forth herein, and the refusal or declination of any member to be bound by any obligation to the organization shall also constitute notice of withdrawal. (a) Actual withdrawal shall not take effect for a period of forty-five (45) days from the date of such notification. (b) Upon effective withdrawal the member shall continue to be responsible (1) for all of its prorated share of any unpaid Class 2 obligations, (2) for its share of Class 1 charges to the effective date of withdrawal, (3) for its share of any Class 3 charges to the effective date of withdrawal and (4) for any contractual obligations it has separately incurred with LOGIS. Section 2. A member who has not given notice of withdrawal on or before June 15 of a given year is obligated for the budgeted revenues and the cost sharing charges fixed by the Board for the ensuing fiscal year in accordance with Article IX. (Added by Amendment No. 1, December 3, 1993.) Section 3. A member withdrawing from membership at a time when such withdrawal does not result in dissolution of the organization shall forfeit its claim to any assets of the organization except that it shall have access to any software developed for its use while it was a member, in accordance with and (subject to the provisions of Article XIII, Section 5, Paragraph XIII. DISSOLUTION Section 1. The organization shall be dissolved whenever (a) a sufficient number of members withdraws from the organization to DJX62837 LG100-2 10 lo -4 • reduce the total number of members to less than six (6), or (b) by two-thirds vote of all members of the board. Section 2. In the event of dissolution the board shall determine the measures necessary to effect the dissolution and shall provide for taking of such measures as promptly as circumstances permit and subject to the provisions of this agreement. Section 3. Upon dissolution the remaining assets of LOGIS, after payment of all obligations, shall be distributed among the then existing members in proportion to their contributions, as determined by the board, provided that computer software prepared for such members shall be available to them, subject to such reasonable rules and regulations as the board shall determine. Section 4. If, upon dissolution, there is an organizational deficit, such deficit shall be charged to and paid by the members and former members on a pro rata basis, based upon the'Class 1, 2 and 3 charges incurred by such members and former members during the two years preceding the event which gave rise to the dissolution. Section 5. In the event of dissolution the following provisions shall govern the distribution of computer software owned by the organization: (a) All such software shall be an asset of the organization. (b) A member or former member may use (but may not authorize reuse by others) any software developed during its membership upon (1) paying any unpaid sums due LOGIS, (2) paying the costs of taking such software, and (3) complying with reasonable rules and regulations of the board relating to the taking and use of such software. Such rules and regulations may include a reasonable time within which such software must be taken by any member or former member desiring to do so. XIV. DURATION This agreement shall continue in effect indefinitely, until terminated in accordance with its terms. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit has caused this agreement to be signed and delivered on its behalf. • WX62837 L0100-2 1 1 Io-,5 • IN THE PRESENCE OF: (Name of Governmental Unit) By - Its By_ Its E Dated: 19 Filed in the office of the City Manager of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this day of , 19 0 4 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 263 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of first reading of an ordinance amendment designating snow emergencies and authorizing vehicles to be towed under certain conditions. Background: Public Safety and Community Services staff have reviewed ways to improve City response to snow removal. While Richfield street maintenance crews do an excellent job, they are hindered by vehicles which are not moved during snow events. The current ordinance provides that when three or more inches of snow falls, vehicles are to be removed from the street until plowed curb to curb. In addition, Richfield's current practice is to ticket these cars and place red tags on them indicating that they will be towed in 48 hours. The obvious problem here is that street crews cannot clear these areas for two days. By then, the build-up of ice and snow is difficult to remove. The reason for this practice is that current City ordinance provides only for vehicles to be towed that have been parked for over 48 hours. The other area of concern is the confusion related to a "snow emergency." The current ordinance (1305.13) states that when three or more inches of snow falls, vehicles are to be removed until streets are plowed curb to curb. Technically, then, there really is no need to declare a "snow emergency," even though it almost always is declared. The new revision (amendment) being proposed will do the following: • Provide clarity of when a police officer can have a vehicle towed without waiting 48 hours. • Define snow emergency restrictions to include two or more inches of snowfall and/or a declaration of an emergency by the City Engineer and Director of Public Safety. • Add public parking lots to the ordinance (previous ordinances do not address these lots with any clarity. Recommended Motion: Approve first reading of the ordinance amending Section 1305.11 and 1305.13, regarding snow emergencies and the towing of vehicles under certain circumstances and set the public hearing and second reading for September 9, 1996. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Staff has discussed ways in which to improve Richfield's snow removal. While the actual work by City crews has been satisfactory, the current ordinance lacks the tools to assist in getting the job completed more efficiently. 9-1 2. The amendment being proposed provides a better system to assure that snow can be removed from City streets. It also eliminates the need for waiting 48 hours before a vehicle is towed under specific conditions, including snow emergencies. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Leave the current ordinance as is. This would not provide for more efficiency in snow removal. It would not, however, be a major hindrance. Staff would continue with the current practice. This would cause delays in removing snow in some areas if vehicles failed to move for several days. 2. Direct staff to revise the ordinance in some other fashion. Staff would not recommend the odd/even street concept that Minneapolis currently has. Staff believe that is too confusing to the residents. Discussion/Decision Mode: Approve first reading of an ordinance amending Section 1305.11 and 1305.13, providing clearer definition of snow emergencies and specific reasons for the towing of vehicles in snow emergencies without waiting 48 hours and including public (City owned) parking lots in the definition and set September 9, 1996 as public hearing and second reading. is Respec Ily submitted, Jame . Prosser City M ager JDP:ds 0 9- J-1 0 BILL NO. 1996- AMENDMENT TO SECTION 1305 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Section 1305 of the ordinance code of the City of Richfield is hereby amended as follows: 1305.11 Impounding vehicles. Subdivision 1. General rule. A police officer may remove a vehicle from a street or highway or public parking lot to the nearest garage or other place of safety or storage or to a garage or place of safety or storage designated or maintained by the department of public safety, the f li@,A ag ^ mst when any vehicle is parked abandoned or left standing in violation of the terms of this article the same may be impounded in accordance with the terms of the motor vehicle impounding ordinances of the City at the cost and expense of the owner thereof. Subdivision 2. Notice required. When a police officer removes a vehicle from a street or highway or public parking lot and the officer knows or is able to ascertain from the registration records in the vehicle or on file with the motor vehicle registration authorities the name and address of the owner thereof, the officer shall promptly give, or cause to be given in writing to the owner of the fact of such removal and of the place to which such vehicle has been removed. In the event such vehicle is stored in a public garage or other public place of safety or storage, a copy of such notice shall be given to the proprietor of such garage or place. Subdivision 3 When a vehicle may be impounded without prior notice. A vehicle may be impounded with or without citation and without giving notice to its owner only under the following circumstances: (a)tewhen ta vehiele is left cepAei on any bridg°, viaduet, ^a sew y, f e s., or- in ;when the vehicle is impeding or is likely to impede the normal flow of vehicular or pedestrian traffic: or (b) when a vehiele upon a street or- highwff is disabled so as to eenstitute an ebstr-ueti , per-son or- the r per-sons re by r-easen of p physieal v,', aleekel, f M its eustedy ^M r-em ';when the vehicle is illegally parked in a truck bus fire lane taxi or other similar zone where parking is limited to designated classes of vehicles and where such vehicle is interfering with the proper and intended use of such zones. or is parked where prohibited by law or by te=or= or permanent signs during certain hours, on designated days. or at all times; or q-3 (c) when a _hiel_ „°Fm;t4^a r---'°--- an ai+y p, blie str°°± or- higi.., ay in the same laeation for- more than 4 4 he fs in s mxrhen the vehicle poses an immediate danger to the public safety; or (d) VAea a vehisle is left unattended in any fife lane posted pufsuaf4 to th . . . Of this eede:when the vehicle is parked in violation of snow emergency regulations. or (e) when the vehicle is a commercial vehicle unlawfully parked in an area used for residential purposes or zoned as a residence district: or (f) when the vehicle weighs or is registered for a weight in excess of the limits allowed on that surface: or (g) when a vehicle is permitted to remain on my set highway or public parking lot in the same location for more than 48 hours in succession: or (h) when a police officer or other agent authorized by the City of Richfield has probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen or lacks proper registration; or i) when a police officer or other authorized agent has probable cause to believe that the vehicle constitutes evidence of a crime or contains evidence of a crime, if impoundment is is reasonably necessary in such instance to obtain or preserve such evidence: or (j) when the person driving, operating or in physical control of the vehicle is taken into custody and the vehicle is impounded for safekeeping; or _ (k) when a police officer or other agent authorized by the City of Richfield has probably cause to believe that the owner, driver, operator. or person in physical control of the vehicle has failed to respond to five (5) or more citations for parking or traffic offenses: or (1) when the vehicle is parked in a handicap transfer zone when said vehicle does not properly display a handicgpi2ed parking permit Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize seizure of a vehicle without a warrant where a warrant would otherwise be required. c-ri-r.ci-nr=dr?cri°°c iixcxx Sixovvx ? xmxir`i ??xc 1305.13 Snow r-emoma-1. Subdivision 1 +t,r ? No , per-son v or- leave standing any vehieleupea any publie street or- highway in the eity afler- a snowfall of at least t4ee inehes. Pafk4ng may be r-estimed on sueh stfeets or- highways af4er- the snow has been removed of plowed to the ruff lines Subdivision 1. Snow emergency parking restrictions. (a) After a snowfall of two inches or more and/or upon the declaration of a snow emergency by the (City Manager or his designee no person shall stop. stand, park or leave any vehicle or permit it to stand upon any street or highway. Lawful parking may be resumed on such streets or highways after the snow has been removed or plowed curb to curb. q- q 1305 14 Subdivision 1 Removal of vehicles for street maintenance. snow removal. Whenever the Ci , Manager or his designee shall find it necessary, for purposes of facilitating street maintenance operations, to include the removal of snow, ice or street wastes, repair or construction of any street to move any vehicle standing on any street, a police officer in the discharge of duties may cause such vehicle to be moved to the extent necessary for such purposes. Subdivision 2 Definitions As used herein (a) "vehicle" shall mean every device in. upon or by which my person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a street or highway, except devices moved by human power: (b) "street" or "highway" is the entire width between bound= lines of anv way or place when my part thereof is open to the use of the public as a matter of right for purposes of vehicular traffic, (c) "public parking lots" are those parking lots owned and maintained by the City of Richfield. Subdivision 3 Declaration Whenever in the opinion of the City Manager or his designee an emergency exists in the City, or in a section or sections thereof, because of snow. freezing rain sleet ice snowdrifts or other natural phenomena which create. or are likely to create hazardous road conditions impeding or likely t impede the free movement of fire health, police emergency or other vehicular traffic or the safety and welfare of the community, the City Manager or his designee may declare an emergency to exist for a period of seventy-two (72) hours, but such emergency may be sooner terminated if conditions permit. Notice of such emergency shall be given bypress radio or television which news media shall be requested to operate with the City officials and., when given such notice shall constitute due and proper notice. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 9th day of September, 1996. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk is 8 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 262 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: First reading of an ordinance amendment rezoning land at 7645 Nicollet Avenue from C-1 (neighborhood commercial) to MR-1 (two family residential). Background: The City purchased the former video store at 7645 Nicollet Avenue for the 77th Street improvement project. A portion of the property was used for the street, the remainder is available for development. Staff is proposing to rezone the parcel from C-1 (neighborhood commercial) to MR-1 (two family residential). The property could then be sold to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for residential development. The existing building would be demolished and a new home constructed. A single family or two-family home would be developed on the property. The parcel is 10,292 square feet (83 feet by 124 feet), which meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance for a single family or two family lot in the MR-1 district. Recommended Motion: Approve first reading of the attached ordinance rezoning the property at 7645 Nicollet Avenue from C-1 to MR-1; and set a public hearing and second reading for September 9, 1996. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The parcel is located to the north of the 77th Street screen wall, adjacent to residential properties making it an appropriate location for a residential use. 2. The parcel is located at the intersection of two arterial streets making it an appropriate location for housing at a slightly higher density than single family housing. 3. The parcel meets the zoning ordinance requirements for a lot in an MR-1 district. 4. On July 23, 1996 the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the rezoning. James City Manager JDP:ds Alternative Recommendation: Deny this rezoning at first reading. Discussion/Decision Mode: First reading is set for August 12, 1996. If approved, a public hearing and second reading will be scheduled on September 9, 1996. Resp ully submitted, Prosser 8-/ • Bill No. 1996 AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX I OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD (7645 Nicollet Avenue South) THE CITY OF RICHFIELD DOES ORDAIN: Appendix I which describes the boundaries of the various zoning districts of the City is hereby amended in the following respect: A. Section 2, Paragraph (6) is amended to read as follows: 6 M 16 (M 77th d N i 1 1 Th t l * b t eenter lines ef n th ( ) perner-, a-a ep- 1 1g.), a are we a y e e e B. Section 11, Paragraph (81) is amended to read as follows: 811 M-16 (NE corner. 77th and Nicollet) The northerlv 8 feet of Lot 9 and all of Lot 10 in Block 4, A.G. Bogen Company's Nicollet Avenue Addition. This amendment constitutes a rezoning of 7645 Nicollet Avenue South from C-1 to MR-1. Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this day of , 1996. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk • -9- 7645 NICOLLET AVENUE REZONING: C-1 TO MR-1 W Z W Q F- W J J O V PROPERTY LINE 124.26' - ? W Z „ J Y IW a- '10 i • ORIGINAL LOT LINE, __--_-__•-_--_••_--_- .4 0% i NORTH 8 FT. OF LOT #9 LEC RIC' _ 1 • • as ` LOT #10 SCREEN WALL ' 77TH STREET -(I) NORTH SCALE: V= 25' DATE: 7-11-96 SITE PLAN, EXISTING . CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 261 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of a resolution establishing just compensation for acquisition of 6758 Portland Avenue as potential additional site area at City Hall. Background: At the April 1, 1996 Study Session the City Council directed staff to pursue the potential purchase of 6758 Portland Avenue. Several months ago the owner died. Prior to her death she indicated to her son that the City might be interested in purchasing the property. Her son contacted staff. The appraisals and rental analysis has been completed: City's appraisal report $83,000 Estate's appraisal report $88,000 City's review appraisal $85,000 The Inspections Division evaluated the property and repairs needed to bring it into compliance with the rental licensing ordinance. An HRA remodeling advisor evaluated the report of the Inspections Division and determined that the cost of repairs would approximate $10,000. The estate is willing to sell the property for $85,000 assuming that the City undertakes the repairs. A market rent would be $800 per month with the tenant assuming all utility costs. (This rental rate has not been tested at this property.) Recommended Motion: Approve the resolution authorizing the purchase of 6758 Portland Avenue to be funded from the General Fund balance. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Council directed staff to evaluate the feasibility of purchase. 2. The property is vacant and available no relocation is necessary. 3. Rental would be an acceptable interim use. 4. The funds invested would likely be recovered if a decision was made later to not • install parking area. This is especially true because of the sustained market demand for Richfield housing. Alternative Recommendation: Not approved the resolution. Discussion/Decision Mode: The estate is awaiting a decision. Respectfully submitted, Ja es . Prosser Ci nager JDP:cak 0 E '7-J ;'. City Council August 12, 1996 SOURCES & USES 6758 PORTLAND AVENUE Income $ 8,800 Rent 12 x 800 less 1 month. Less Expenses Taxes (est.) $ 2,400 Miscellaneous $ 1,400 Management Company fee (est.) $ 1,500 Interest lost to City (Assume 30 year T Bill 7.05%) 6,416 is due to capital expense Net Income -$ 2,916 Capital Expenditures Acquisition Cost $85,000 Code Compliance $10,000 TOTAL $95,000 I• RESOLUTION NO. 7 ,? THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR PROPERTY ACQUISITION AT 6758 PORTLAND AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota desires to purchase certain real property said real property being described as follows: 6758 Portland Avenue The north 50 feet of the south 80 feet of the east 168 feet of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 27, Township 28, Range 24 WHEREAS, said acquisition is contingent upon the voluntary sale of this vacant property; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes to acquire real property within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the funds have been provided by the City and are available for the acquisition of'the project parcel; and WHEREAS, the City has caused an appraisal of the subject property to be made by qualified independent professional real estate appraisers to determine fair market value. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the approved purchase price for 6758 Portland Avenue is $85,000. 2. That the City Manager and Mayor are authorized to execute a purchase agreement and other appropriate agreements to effectuate the purchase for the amount set forth in this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of August, 1996. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: • Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 260 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Public hearing regarding a request for an amended planned unit development plan for Richfield State Agency, 6625 Lyndale Avenue, to allow construction of an accessory building. Background: Richfield State Agency is proposing to construct a 2,120 square foot accessory building at the west end of the existing drive-up teller facility. The building would be used for vehicle storage and maintenance work for the bank site. Vehicles would be able to drive in and out to 67th Street and to the bank property. A portion of the garage would be constructed under the existing canopy, eliminating two drive-up service bays. The existing Automated Teller Machine (ATM) would be moved two bays to the east. The exterior of the building would be brick, matching the exterior of the existing buildings. Additional landscaping will be planted to replace landscaping that would be removed for construction of the building. 0 Recommended Motion: Approve the amended planned unit development plan for Richfield State Agency, 6625 Lyndale Avenue, to allow construction of a 2,120 square foot accessory building with the following stipulation: 1. That plantings be installed per the attached landscape plan before October 31, 1996 or an escrow be submitted for the cost of the landscaping. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The proposed accessory building will allow for indoor storage of vehicles currently stored outside. 2. The proposed building will allow for central storage of equipment and supplies. 3. The proposed building meets all requirements for an accessory building in the underlying C-2 (general commercial) district. 4. Notice of the hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. 5. On July 23, 1996 the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the amended planned unit development plan. (0-1 Alternative Recommendation: Deny the request with a finding that the proposal would have an adverse impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 12, 1996. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. A decision must be rendered by August 31, 1996 or a notice of an extension must be provided to the applicant. Respectfully submitted, JamJ Prosser City ger JDP:ds • 0 cZ. 6625 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH MAINTENANCE BUILDING f Jet/ Q / v Q O 4 2 a 0 I* - - • • . PLANNING ZONING NORTH Community DCVeiopmerR DoQelltifwM EXISTING BANK BUILDIIJG -18 VEHICLES > 0 0 0 0 t Ilk EXISTING DRIVE-UP BUILDING 67TH STREET n NEW BUILDING DATE: 7-14-96 SITE PLAN 9777777,, 6625 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH MAINTENANCE BUILDING NORWAY MAPLE MANEY JUNIPER MANEY JUNIPER COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE FLOOR AND LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH SCALE: V= 11' DATE: 7-14-96 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 259 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Public hearing regarding a request for a conditional use permit to allow an expansion of the existing cemetery at Church of the Assumption, 305 East 77th Street. Background: Church of the Assumption, 305 East 77th Street, is proposing to expand their existing cemetery to the south of its current location. The existing service road would be rerouted to circle around the cemetery. Evergreen trees would be planted along the eastern property line to provide some buffering of the proposed use from the adjacent apartment buildings. The proposed expansion takes into account the current freeway expansion plans. The revised zoning ordinance requires a minimum lot size of 5 acres for cemeteries. The size of the existing cemetery is approximately 1.6 acres. With the proposed 0.35 acre addition,. the cemetery would be approximately 2 acres in size. Although the existing cemetery is legally nonconforming, any expansion requires that it be brought into conformance with all current ordinance regulations. The Hearing Examiner will • consider a variance request on August 20, 1996. Recommended Motion: Approve the request for a conditional use permit to allow an expansion of the existing cemetery at Church of the Assumption, 305 East 77th Street, with the following stipulations: That the permit be subject to a favorable determination by the Hearing Examiner. 2. That a landscape plan be approved by the Community Development Director. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The proposed cemetery expansion would improve the appearance of that area of the property. 2. The proposed expansion does not interfere with the current expansion plans for 1- 494. 3. Landscaping will be planted along the east property line to provide some buffering from the adjacent multi-family residential use. 4. Notice of the hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property • owners within 350 feet of the subject property. 5. On July 23, 1996 the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the amended planned unit development plan. Alternative Recommendation: Deny the request with a finding that the proposal would have an adverse impact on the ability to accommodate potential expansions of 1-494 in the future subsequent to the current expansion plans. Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 12, 1996. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. A decision must be rendered by August 24, 1996 or a notice of an extension must be provided to the applicant. Respect Ily submitted, Jame . Prosser City Manager 0 JDP:ds • 305 EAST 77TH STREET ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH 5-a 77TH STREET - - - - - - 1 CHURCH I m WW z Q? GI NI O O C) N PROPERTY LINE I ACTIVITY BLDG. ` I --------------------- -------------------- NEW ROAD I ROAD TO BE REMOVED F I i I I PROPERTY LINE 78TH STREET SITE PLAN CEMETERY EXPANSION MANNING '\,V ZONING NORTH CoenmunltyDevelopmentD"artm nt SCALE: 1" = 100' DATE: 7-14-96 4 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 258 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Public hearing regarding a request for a conditional use permit to allow operation of a day care for sick children at 7108 Chicago Avenue. Background: The applicant, United Nursing and Health Care, is proposing to operate a day care for sick children in the former doctor's office at 7108 Chicago Avenue. The day care will serve a maximum of 12 children. Five parking spaces are provided on site, one of which will be designated for picking up and dropping off children. Outdoor play space is not needed or required for this type of day care. The front boulevard area will be sodded to alleviate an existing drainage problem. The applicant has submitted an application to the Department of Human Services for a day care license. The applicant will comply with the Department's requirement that children with different illnesses be kept in separate rooms. Recommended Motion: Approve the conditional use permit for 7108 Chicago Avenue to allow operation of a day care for up to 12 sick children with the following stipulation: 1. That all applicable state, county and city licenses be obtained. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The proposed day care is an appropriate low-intensity use in the C-1, neighborhood commercial, district. 2. Adequate parking is provided on site. 3. The proposed day care would provide a service to families with children that is currently difficult to find. 4. Notice of the hearing was published in the Sun-Current and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. 5. On July 23, 1996 the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit. Alternative Recommendation: Deny the request with a finding that the proposal would have an adverse impact on adjacent properties or the City as a whole. 4 -i Discussion/Decision Mode: A public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 12, 1996. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers of Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Avenue. A decision must be rendered by September 7, 1996 or a notice of an extension must be provided to the applicant. Respectful) submitted, James . Prosser City Manager JDP:ds E 0 NORTH SITE PLAN SCALE: V= 25' DATE: 7-11-96 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 3 Council Letter No. 257 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a new residential kennel license for Ethel Zobel, 6800 Cedar Avenue. Background: On June 23, 1996, Ethel Zobel submitted an application for a residential kennel license. She owns three dogs. Ms. Zobel's application had all contiguous property owner's signatures on it. On June 28, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. The City has adopted a policy that staff notify neighbors surrounding the area of the residential kennel license. Staff received no calls or complaints from any of the neighbors. Although this application is for three dogs, it does not exceed the maximum number of six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a new residential kennel license for Ethel Zobel, 6800 Cedar Avenue, be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two dogs does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Ms. Zobel has been able to do this. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny Ms. Zobel's residential kennel license. This would mean that she would have to reduce the number of animals on her property from three to two. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve a residential kennel license for Ethel Zobel, 6800 Cedar Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respectfull submitted, James Prosser City Manager JDP:cak CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 3F Council Letter No. 253 • Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a renewal of a residential kennel license for Carolyn Kretchmer, 7232-11th Avenue. Background: On June 28, 1996, Carolyn Kretchmer submitted an application for a residential kennel license. She owns four dogs. Ms. Kretchmer's application had all contiguous property owners' signatures on it. On July 20, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. The City has adopted a policy that staff notify neighbors surrounding the area of the residential kennel license. Staff received no calls or complaints from any of the neighbors. Although this application is for four dogs, it does not exceed the maximum number of six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a residential kennel license for Carolyn Kretchmer, 7232-11th Avenue, be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two dogs does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Ms. Kretchmer has been able to do this. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny Ms. Kretchmer's residential kennel license. This would mean that she would have to reduce the number of dogs she has from four to two. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a residential kennel license for Carolyn Kretchmer, 7232-11th Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respectful) submitted, Jams Prosser City ager JDP:cak CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA / Council Letter No. 254 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a renewal of a residential kennel license for James Ruedy, 7600 Grand Avenue. Background: On June 29, 1996, James Ruedy submitted an application for a residential kennel license. He owns five cats. Mr. Ruedy's application contains the signatures of contiguous property owners. On July 20, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. The City has adopted a policy that staff notify neighbors surrounding the area of the residential kennel license. Staff received no calls or complaints from any of the neighbors. Although this application is for five cats, it does not exceed the maximum number of six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a residential kennel license for James Ruedy, 7600 Grand Avenue, be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two cats does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Mr. Ruedy has been able to do this. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny Mr. Ruedy's residential kennel license. This would mean that he would have to reduce the number of cats he has from five to two. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a residential kennel license for James Ruedy, 7600 Grand Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respectf y submitted, James . Prosser City Manager JDP:cak CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 255 1? Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a renewal of a residential kennel license for Ronald and Margaret Glaub, 7209-12th Avenue. Background: On July 10, 1996, Margaret Glaub submitted an application for a residential kennel license. She owns four dogs. Mrs. Glaub's application contains the signatures of contiguous property owners. On July 16, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. The City has adopted a policy that staff notify neighbors surrounding the area of the residential kennel license. Staff received no calls or complaints from any of the neighbors. Although this application is for four dogs, it does not exceed the maximum number of six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a residential kennel license for Ronald and Margaret Glaub, 7209-12th Avenue, be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two dogs does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Mrs. Glaub has been able to do this. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny Mrs. Glaub's residential kennel license. This would mean that she would have to reduce the number of dogs she has from four to two. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a residential kennel license for Ronald and Margaret Glaub, 7209-12th Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. II• ubmitted, Respe fl? James T.Prosser City Manager JDP:cak 3F-3 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 256 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a renewal of a residential kennel license for Victoria Bauch, 7215 Vincent Avenue. Background: On July 8, 1996, Victoria Bauch submitted an application for a residential kennel license. She owns three dogs. Ms. Bauch's application contains the signatures of contiguous property owners. On August 5, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. The City has adopted a policy that staff notify neighbors surrounding the area of the residential kennel license. Staff received no calls or complaints from any of the neighbors. Although this application is for three dogs, it does not exceed the maximum number of six animals that was approved by the Council as policy on July 22, 1991. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a residential kennel license be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. It is up to the animal owner to prove that the keeping of more than two dogs does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Ms. Bauch has been able to do this. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny Ms. Bauch's residential kennel license. This would mean that she would have to reduce the number of dogs she has from three to two. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a residential kennel license for Victoria Bauch, 7215 Vincent Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respec submitted, Ja es Prosser 40 City ager JDP:ds 3C • CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 251 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a commercial kennel license for Airport Pet Hospital, 6301 Cedar Avenue. Background: On July 16, 1996, Airport Pet Hospital submitted an application for the renewal of their commercial kennel license. On July 19, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a commercial kennel license for Airport Pet Hospital, 6301 Cedar Avenue, be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 40 1. The applicant has complied with the City codes pertaining to a commercial kennel license. 2. The City has previously issued a kennel license to Airport Pet Hospital. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny the request for a commercial kennel license; however the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a commercial kennel license for Airport Pet Hospital, 6301 Cedar Avenue, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respectfully submitted, Prosser Jam V'nager City 0 JDP:cak CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 252 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of an application for a renewal of a commercial kennel license for Pet Food Warehouse, 710 West 66th Street. Background: On June 25, 1996, Pet Food Warehouse submitted an application for the renewal of a commercial kennel license. This license will be for the grooming of animals only. There will be no kenneling of animals at any time. On July 19, 1996, an inspection of the property was conducted by a Community Service Officer. There were no apparent problems found at that time. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends that the application for a commercial kennel license for Pet Food Warehouse, 710 East 66th Street, be approved. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has been made aware of the City codes pertaining to a commercial kennel license. Alternative Recommendation: 1.. The Council could decide to deny the request for a commercial kennel license; however, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. Discussion/Decision Mode: Recommendation to approve the application for a commercial kennel license for Pet Food Warehouse, 710 West 66th Street, is presented for Council consideration at this time. Respectf Ily submitted, Jame IProsser City Manager JDP:cak • 3D CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 250 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Request by Church of the Assumption, 305 East 77th Street, for an on-sale non- intoxicating malt liquor license, itinerant place of amusement license and an itinerant food license for the 1996 Fun Fest to be held August 17 and 18, 1996. Background: On July 26, 1996, Church of the Assumption submitted a request for a temporary license to serve non-intoxicating malt liquor (3.2 beer), an itinerant place of amusement and an itinerant food license for August 17 and 18, 1996. They are requesting that any fee be waived. Recommended Motion: Approve the on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor, itinerant place of amusement, and itinerant food licenses with fees waived for Church of the Assumption Fun Fest held on August 17 and 18, 1996. Basis for Recommendation: 1. The applicant has complied with the City codes pertaining to these licenses. 2. The applicant will supply liquor liability insurance coverage as soon as possible. City Manager JDP:cak 3. The City has previously issued these licenses in conjunction with the Assumption Fun Fest. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The Council could decide to deny the request; however, the Public Safety Department has not found any basis for a denial. In addition, the Council has previously granted these licenses in conjunction with the Assumption Fun Fest. Discussion/Decision Mode: The request for these licenses has been placed on the consent calendar for August 12, 1996. Respectful) ubmitted, James Prosser 3c CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 249 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of a resolution regarding an agreement between the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and the City of Richfield, Public Safety Department, Police Division, pertaining to the Community Oriented Policing (COPS) Grant Program. The period of this agreement would be July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. Back rg ound: Public Safety Department, Police Division, submitted an application for the COPS Grant Program after being notified that funds would become available, if approved, for the purpose of payment to officers for overtime. This overtime would be used by the officers only on specific projects and programs which the Department outlined in the application. The City of Richfield, not unlike other cities throughout the country, has experienced an increase in violent crime committed by juveniles. With the premise that getting youth with a propensity for trouble into the justice system before they have committed a serious crime may prevent them from committing more serious crimes in the future, the City's project will focus primarily on juveniles. The specific areas include: • Truancy Project -- working with the Bloomington Police and the Mall of America Security, Richfield officers would make truancy sweeps at the Mall of America; • Bicycle Patrol -- using officers to patrol certain parks, Richfield's main business district and neighborhoods; and • Curfew/Crime Reduction Project -- getting juveniles off the streets during late night hours. Recommended Motion: Council approval of the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of grant funds in the amount of $20,000 to be used for the payment of overtime for officers involved in the Truancy Project, Bicycle Patrol and Curfew/Crime Reduction Project. Basis of Recommendation: 1. Approval of the resolution would allow interested officers to be paid overtime for work on the projects beyond the normal range of their duties. 2. Community Oriented Policing (COPS) and juvenile crime have been important areas of concentration for the Richfield Police. Approval of the resolution makes available needed funds to cover costs associated with focusing on these areas. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Council could disapprove the resolution which would void the said agreement. • Discussion/Decision Mode: Council approval of the resolution authorizing the acceptance of grant funds in the amount of $20,000 from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety by the City of Richfield, Public Safety Department, Police Division. Respectfully submitted, James . Prosser City Manager JDP:ds 0 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the Governor has designated the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety (hereinafter called the STATE) as the agency responsible for administration of funds available to the State of Minnesota under provisions of Minnesota Statutes 299A.62 for Community Oriented Policing (COPS) Grants Program; and WHEREAS, the STATE is authorized under provisions of Minnesota Statutes 299A.62 to make contracts from State funds to qualified applicants; and WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Public Safety Department (hereinafter called the GRANTEE) is authorized to accept State funds for overtime to conduct truancy sweeps, curfew sweeps and bike patrols; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE represents that it is duly qualified and willing to carry out the tasks described above. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Richfield enter into a cooperative agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the projects • entitled Curfew Sweeps, Truancy Sweeps and Bike Patrols during the period from July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997. James D. Prosser, City Manager, is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments, as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Richfield. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of August, 1996. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk 0 CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 248 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Consideration of a resolution setting just compensation and authorizing the purchase on a voluntary basis of property at 6925 Penn Avenue. Background: In furtherance of the Storm Water Capital Improvement Program in the 6901 block of Penn Avenue, the owners of 6925 Penn Avenue have responded favorably to the opportunity to sell their property to the City. Recommended Motion: Approve the resolution which sets just compensation and authorizes the purchase of 6925 Penn Avenue for $85,000. Basis of Recommendation: 1. The purchase would be funded from the Storm Water Utility Fund, with a loan from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. 2. The owners have been advised that the purchases would be voluntary without • payment of relocation benefits. 3. An appraisal report was completed by a professional real estate appraiser who valued the property at $85,000. 4. This property is impacted by storm water. Alternative Recommendation: 1. Delay action. 2. Reject the concept of purchasing the property. Discussion/Decision Mode: The owners are anxious to receive an offer, make a decision and move before fall. Respectfully submitted, Jame . Prosser City Manager • JDP:ds 66--I 0 RESOLUTION NO. THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR PROPERTY ACQUISITION IN THE 69TH STREET AND PENN AVENUE AREA WHEREAS, the City of Richfield, Minnesota desires to purchase certain real property impacted by storm water said real property being described as follows: 6925 Penn Avenue Lot 17, Block 10, Tingdale Bros', Lincoln Hills Addition WHEREAS, said acquisition is contingent upon the voluntary sale of the property by owners who would waive any and all potential relocation benefits; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes to acquire real property within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City's storm water utility fund is the revenue source for the acquisition of the project parcels; and • WHEREAS, the City has caused an appraisal of the subject property to be made by qualified independent professional real estate appraisers to determine fair market value. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota as follows: 1. That just compensation for 6925 Penn Avenue is $85,000. 2. That the City Manager and Mayor are authorized to execute appropriate agreements. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of August, 1996. Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor ATTEST: 0 Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk 3P CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA Council Letter No. 247 Agenda August 12, 1996 Issue Statement: Resolution designating polling places and appointing election judges for the September 10, 1996 State Primary Election and the November 5, 1996 General Election. Background: Minnesota Statute 20413.21, Subd. 2 provides that election judges for precincts in a municipality shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality and that the appointments be made at least 25 days before the election at which the election judges will serve. The City Clerk's office has just completed updating and verifying the City's election judge availability list. All individuals who have previously served as an election judge or have expressed an interest in serving as an election judge were sent a questionnaire to: 1. Determine whether or not they wished to remain on the election judge availability list. 2. Verify existing file information regarding address, political party, etc. 3. Receive an indication of availability to work at the 1996 scheduled elections. The attached resolution contains the names of all of the individuals on the updated election judge availability list. Appointment by the City Council will allow them to serve as election judges at the Primary Election, the General Election or both elections. Election judges will be assigned to the precincts based on availability, party balance, and the number required for each election. The General Election will require assignment of the greatest number of available judges because this is a Presidential Election. The State Primary Election will be conducted on Tuesday, September 10, 1996 and the General Election will be conducted on Tuesday, November 5, 1996. Therefore, the City Council must appoint election judges to serve at these elections. Recommendation: Adopt the attached resolution designating polling places and appointing election judges for the State Primary Election to be held on Tuesday, September 10, 1996 and the General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 5, 1996. Basis for Recommendation: 1. Compliance with Minnesota Statute 20413.21, Subd. 2. 2. The proposed resolution contains names of those who have indicated a willingness and ability to serve as an election judge for the September 10, 1996 State Primary Election and the November 5, 1996 General Election. The names come from a list of people who have indicated their interest in serving as an election judge to the County Auditor pursuant to the provisions of M:S. 20413.21 subd.1 and those who have previously served or indicated interest in serving. Alternative Recommendation: 1. The City Council could chose to appoint others who are not named in the resolution. 2. If the City Council does not appoint election judges, the conduct of the election would not be valid. Discussion/Decision Mode: The City Council is required by state statute to make election judge appointments at least 25 days prior to the election. Therefore, it is recommended the City Council pass the attached resolution at this meeting. Respec ully submitted, 40 1 James D. Prosser City Manager JDP:ds • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE STATE PRIMARY ELECTION OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 AND THE GENERAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 5, 1996 3A- Z WHEREAS, a State Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, September 10, 1996 and a General Election will be held on Tuesday, November 5, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, that said elections shall be held at the polling places as herein appear specified: Precinct No. 1 Ward 3 Precinct No. 2 Ward 2 Precinct No. 3 Ward 1 Precinct No. 4 Ward 1 Precinct No. 5 Ward 1 Precinct No. 6 Ward 2 Precinct No. 7 Ward 2 Precinct No. 8 Ward 3 Precinct No. 9 Ward 3 Mt. Calvary Education Building 6541 16th Avenue St. Peter's Catholic Church 6730 Nicollet Avenue Sheridan Hills School 6400 Sheridan Avenue St. Richard's Catholic Church 7540 Penn Avenue Richfield Junior High School 7461 Oliver Avenue Central School Building 7145 Harriet Avenue Hope Presbyterian Education Facility 7201 4th Avenue Richfield Intermediate School 7020 12th Avenue Centennial School 7315 Bloomington Avenue 3p- 3 Resolution No. -2- and, that the following are hereby appointed as judges for said elections: l?J 1J James Alagna (Reform) Mark Amberson (R) Janice Andersen (R) Clyde Anderson (R) David Arnold (R) Ben Arriola (R) Angela Aylward (R) Kathryn Bakke (R) Steve Bakke (R) Mark Benefiel (R) Muriel Bernstein (DFL) Roy Blankenship (R) Linda Bloomgren (DFL) Elizabeth Bowman (R) Linda Boyd (R) Gert Broker (R) Ann C. Burkhardt (DFL) Vernette Carlson (DFL) Mr. Ted Chao (R) Darlene Colbenson (DFL) Barb Cook (DFL) Geraldine R. Cooper (R) Corrine Cosgrove (DFL) Clara Darsow (DFL) Emily Day (DFL) Maurice Devitt (DFL) Alice Dickinson (R) Celestine Dumas (R) Liz Ekholm (DFL) Mary F. Erickson (R) Lynette Farnell (Reform) Veronica Fashant (DFL) Donna Fischer (DFL) Jette Floberg (R) Beatrice Frankus (DFL) Eloise Friend (R) Betty Funk (R) Mark H. Gardner (DFL) Nancy Garwick (DFL) Beverly Gerber (DFL) Elayne Gilhousen (R) Shirley Gisselquist (DFL) Betty Halloran (R) Mary Lee Hanson (DFL) Gladys Hayden (DFL) Diane Mary Healey (R) Joan Helmer (DFL) Arthur Herll (DFL) Gertrude Herll (DFL) Mae Hermansen (R) Helen Hillstrom (DFL) Millie Hines (DFL) John Nelson (DFL) Renee Nelson (R) Marilyn Nienkerk (DFL) Dawn Nilsen (R) Edyth Nye (R) Mark Olsinger (R) Ruth Irene Olson (DFL) Fern Oreck (DFL) Ruth Pafko (DFL) Allan Parker (R) Dorothy A. Peabody (R) Joan Pelfrey (DFL) Barbara Peterson (DFL) Helen Peterson (DFL) Marilyn Peterson (DFL) Martha Prottengeier (R) Eleanor Rasmussen (DFL) Carolyn Ring (R) Harriet Ring (DFL) Kathie Roberts (DFL) Russ Rooney (R) Gladys Rudy (DFL) Michael Sable (R) Julian Sandsness (R) Mary Ann Schindler (DFL) Dorothy Schostag (DFL) Joann Schuldt (Reform) Judy Schultz (R) Suzanne Sower (R) Marvis Jean Spencer (DFL) William Stixrud (DFL) Geraldine Stoffel (R) Fay Sullivan (DFL) Eleanore Swanson (R) Mary Swanson (DFL) Arline Thomas (R) Marion Thompson (Reform) Gayle C. Ticen (DFL) Claire Todd (DFL) Pat Toney (R) Gertrude Ulrich (DFL) Bernice Utter (DFL) Kathryn Voigt-Johnson (DFL) Helen Volz (DFL) Marilyn Sue Wagner (R) Audrey Winslow (R) Jack Winslow (R) Mildred Wolfe (DFL) Floyd Young (DFL) Nan R. Znidar (DFL) Ilene Holen (R) JoAnn Holt (R) Rose Hoppenrath (R) Marion Horning (DFL) Jill Horowitz (DFL) William G. Hulwi (DFL) Mary Lou Janco (DFL) Bernice Johnson (DFL) Ray Johnson (DFL) Elaine Kaibel (DFL) Danette Kamrath (R) Olga Kelash (DFL) William J. Kennedy (R) Nancy Kilpeck (R) June King (R) Emil Sherwood Koebnick (DFL) Shirley Elaine Koebnick (DFL) Rosemary Koelln (R) Earl Kommerstad (Reform) Lois Kovach (DFL) Dorothy Kraus (DFL) Robert Kraus (DFL) Michaelene Kvaale (R) Bernadette Lais (R) Pauline Leighton (DFL) Susan Lewis (R) Doris Liedtke (DFL) Nancy Lindberg (DFL) Jeanne Lindstrom (R) Jeanette Lofstrom (DFL) Doris Long (R) Norton W. Lund (R) Ruth Lundquist (DFL) Darold Luze (DFL) David MacAdam (DFL) Lavona MacAdam (DFL) Lorraine Maki (DFL) Clifford Martinson (R) LuAnn May (DFL) Connie McDonald (DFL) Patricia Medley (DFL) Donna Mercer (DFL) Robert Meyerson (R) Alvina Mjelve (R) Carolyn Moe (DFL) Richard Morey (DFL) Helen Moritz (DFL) Carol Mortenson (R) Philip Mortenson (R) Abner Morvig (DFL) Ann Mullerleile (DFL) Jane Myre (R) .15 I,)-q Resolution No. -3- OH W- . PASSED by the City Council of Richfield, Minnesota this 12th day of August, 1996. Martin J. Kirsch Mayor ATTEST: Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk • 0