04-15-96 agenda• CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, APRIL 15, 1996
REGULAR HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR HRA MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1996
OPPORTUNITY FOR CITIZENS TO ADDRESS THE HRA ON ITEMS NOT ON
THE AGENDA
2. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
SALE OF CLOVERLEAF PROPERTY TO MERIDIAN PROPERTIES REAL
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT L.L.C. D/B/A TOLD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
HRA LETTER NO. 16
3. PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
SALE OF NEW HOME PROGRAM PROPERTY AT 6320 OLIVER AVENUE TO
TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
HRA LETTER NO. 17
4. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN MAXFIELD RESEARCH
GROUP TO PROVIDE SENIOR HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSIS
HRA LETTER NO. 18
5. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN SERVICES OF BRW, INC._
TO PREPARE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST PLAN FOR LHN IN AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $5,975
HRA LETTER NO. 19
6. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR FUNDING TO CONTINUE
DESIGN ADVISOR SERVICES UNDER RICHFIELD REMODELING PROGRAM
HRA LETTER NO. 20
7. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF 7636
THIRD AVENUE FOR RICHFIELD REDISCOVERED PROGRAM
HRA LETTER N0.21
8. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
9. CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request.
Requests must be made. at least 96 hours in advance to the Administrative
Services Director at 861-9702.
•
U
.HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHOf~ITY
HRA Letter No. 21
Agenda April 15, 1996
Issue Statement:
Consideration of a resolution authorizing the purchase of 7636 Third Avenue for
Richfield Rediscovered.
Backarountl:
The property at 7636 Third Avenue is vacant, and the owner has offered it to the HRA
for purchase. Part of the 1 1/2 story house was moved to the site in 1915. An addition
to the house was later made. The property has several housing and building code
violations, including heating, electrical and plumbing systems. The garage is also
deteriorated and in poor condition. All interior finishes need updating, and the general
layout is not functional by today's standards. BCL Appraisals determined a fair market
value of $68,000. However, the owner wants to sell immediately and has negotiated a
discount with staff. The sale price is $59,000.
The lot is on a quiet residential street-and is well suited for new construction. The
sellers live out of town and are eager to sell. This property would be part of .the
Richfield Rediscovered Program.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the attached resolution which authorizes:
1. The. purchase of 7636 Third Avenue for $59,000.
2. The Executive Director and HRA Chairperson to execute a purchase agreement and
other documents to effectuate the purchase.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The property meets program requirements for acquisition.
2. Funding for acquisition is available.
3. The owner has voluntarily indicated an interest in selling the property to the HRA.
4. The property is not a historic structure per the Minnesota Historical Society.
5. The purchase price of $59,000 is a negotiated value based on the property's age,
deterioration, the excessive cost to repair and improve it, and the owner's interest
in an immediate sale.
Alternative Recommendation:
Do not authorize acquisition.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
A purchase agreement has been prepared
1996.
Respectfully submitted,
James .Prosser
Execut ve Director
JDP:cak
•
The closing date is scheduled for April 18,
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE
OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT:
7636 THIRD AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota (HRA) desires to purchase. certain- real property pursuant to and in
furtherance of the Richfield Rediscovered Redevelopment Project (Project) heretofore
adopted by the City of Richfield (City) and the HRA, said real property being described
as attached; and
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.012 to
acquire real property within its area of operations; and
WHEREAS, the property meets all program requirements for acquisition; and
WHEREAS, the HRA has caused an appraisal of the subject property to be
made by a qualified independent professional real estate appraiser, and has negotiated
a purchase price with the owner of $59,000; and
WHEREAS, funds have been provided by the HRA and are available for
acquisition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Richfield Housing and
Redevelopment Authority:
1. That the approved purchase price is $59,000.
2. That the Chairperson and Executive Director are authorized to execute a
purchase agreement and other documents to effectuate purchase for the
amount set forth in this resolution.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota this 15th day of April, 1996.
Thomas E. Harms, Chair
ATTEST:
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
for 7636 Third Avenue South
The South 75 feet of that- part of Government Lot 1, Section 34, Township 28 North,
Range 24 West, of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at a
point corresponding to the Northeast corner of Southeast 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of
Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of said Section 34, Township 28, Range 24; thence
West parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 1 to a point in a line
corresponding to the West line of East 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of
Southeast 1/4 of said Section; thence Southerly along said West line a distance of 150
feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Government Lot 1 to said line
corresponding to the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of said Section;
thence North along said line to beginning.
•
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. 20
Agenda April 15, 1996
Issue Statement:
Authorize funds to continue Design Advisor services under the Richfield Remodeling
Program.
Background:
The Richfield Remodeling Program has offered Remodel Advisor services for just over
two years. The complementary Design Advisor service was added approximately a
year later through Visions, Inc. During that time, the Design Advisor has met with
almost 30 households whose projects would benefit from professional design advice.
Seven of those visits were made in 1996. A design visit follows a remodel home visit,
and includes sketches or drawings, and alternative design suggestions, as appropriate.
Visions Inc. is able to provide $2,500 toward the program this year. A $2,500 match
from the HRA would ensure continued service through 1996.
' Recommended Motion:
Authorize funding $2,500 toward the Design Advisor service to match the $2,500
provided by the Visions, Inc. ,.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The Design Advisor service is part of the Richfield HRA's Remodeling Program
2. Visions, Inc. is unable to fund the full service and has requested participation by
the HRA.
3. Funding for the service is available.
4. Residents contemplating value-added improvements receive appropriate advice
which results in satisfied residents and a more attractive community.
Alternative Recommendation:
Do not authorize funding.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Remodeling Advisors continue to meet with residents who may benefit from design
services.
Res tf submitted,
James D. Prosser
Executive Director
JDP:cak
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. i9
Agenda April 15, 1996
Issue Statement:
Preparation of a pedestrian and bicyclisf plan for the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) area.
Background:
In approximately 1974 the redevelopment plan for the area identified as the LHN was
formulated. In an effort to reduce motor vehicular traffic an extensive and
comprehensive sidewalk system was planned. However, plan implementation was
often frustrated as new buildings were sized and sited differently than envisioned in the
plan and some property owners were not cooperative in providing easements.
Additionally the original plan did not necessarily reflect realistic pedestrian paths. There
has also been significant development of senior housing in this area. The senior
housing provides a need to reexamine the pedestrian path for this area.
Recommended Motion:
Retain the services of BRW Inc. to prepare a pedestrian and bicyclist plan for the LHN
at a cost not to exceed $5,975.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Encouraging pedestrian and bicyclist traffic within the LHN area is a desirable
objective.
2. Currently there are only fragmented sections of such a system.
3. The BRW proposal encompasses a desirable process; Phase I which the attached
proposal addresses includes-four delineated tasks. Subsequently a Phase II
program could be formulated.
4. Phase I would be completed in approximately 60 days.
5. Funds. are available for this activity from the LHN Fund.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Delay consideration.
2: Direct staff to an alternative approach.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
The study could be initiated in May 1996.
Respe t II submitted,
James .Prosser
Executive Director
JDP:ds
B R W INC.
Planning
Transportation
Engineering
Urban Design
Thresher Square
700 Third Street So.
Minneapolis,
MN 55415
612/370-0700
Fax 612/370-1378
Mazch 27, 1996
Mr. Bruce Palmborg
Community Development Director
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Dear Bruce,
As you requested, following is a proposal to prepaze a Pedestrian/Bicyclist
Framework/Enhancement Plan. for the Lyndale/Hub/Nicollet (LHN) area. At the
meeting on Mazch 12, 1996, with City staff, a number of issues and concerns
were raised regarding the circulation in the LHN azea, and the need to evaluate
them. This proposal outlines a process for addressing these concerns and
includes: Understanding of the Issues, Work Program, and Fee Schedule.
Denver
Milwaukee
Minneapolis ~ UNDERSTANDING OF THE ISSUES
Orlando
Phoenix
Portland Over the last 20 years, the. LHN area has undergone dramatic changes and. a
san Diegq complete transformation from a dysfunctional grouping of various land uses to a
Seattle highly successful multi- and mixed-use commercial district. The transformation,
which began with the LHN Commercial Area Study, prepazed by BRW, Inc. in
1974, has resulted in dramatic land use changes and the development of new
circulation routes and patterns.
Most of the developments and improvements, recommended by the LHN Study,
have .been implemented and are working very well. Other improvements,
however, have not worked out as anticipated or expected, because:
^ The new developments were modfied$om the original plan;
^ Circulation patterns have changed; and/or
^ Insufficient consideration has been given to providing and maintaining
the pedestrian and bicyclist circulation system.
As areas age and mature, circulation patterns will change and need to be
periodically reviewed and reevaluated. The key overall issue, before the City
right now, is what would the ideal circulation system be and what circulation
modifications/enhancements aze necessary and/or desirable.
Bruce Palmborg
March 27, 1996
Page 2
It is our understanding that the City would like to address this issue in a
sequential order. Therefore, we have geared the Work Program, outlined in this
proposal, toward defining the first steps in the design process, which include:
^ Inventory and assessment of the existing situation;
^ Preparation of an overall framework plan; and
^ Identification of specific modifications/enhancements to the circulation
system that would be necessary and/or desirable.
Once the necessary/desired modifications/enhancements are identified, a
determination will be made by the City regarding how to proceed with their
implementation.
WORK PROGRAM
PHASE 1: FRAMEWORK PLAN AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Task 1: Inventory/Assessment
Inventory the existing pedestrian/bicyclist circulation system and the signalized
vehicular entry off 66th Street in the project area. The project area is defined as
the portion of the LHN district located between Lyndale Avenue, 65th Street,
Nicollet Avenue, and 66th Street.
Evaluate the area and identify key issues/forces which impact the
pedestrian/bicyclist circulation system and the vehicular entry off 66th Street .
Prepare a map to illustrate the Inventory/Analysis.
Task 2; Framework Plan and Improvement Concepts
Based upon the Inventory/Assessment and input from City staff and project area
stakeholders, prepare concepts for a recommended Pedestrian/Bicyclist
Framework Plan and specific improvements, as well as recommendations for the
vehicular entry of 66th Street.
•
Bruce Pahnborg
March 27, 1996
Page 3
Task 3: Recommended Framework Plan and Improvement Program
Refine the Framework Plan and identify specific modifications/enhancements to
the pedestriari/bicyclistpedestrfan system and the vehicular entry off 66th Street,
which would be necessary and/or desirable. Prepare a preliminary concept cost
estimate for the recommended modifications/enhancements:
Prepare 20 copies of a technical memorandum summarizing all the key findings
and recommendations.
Task 4: Meetings
The proposed Phase 1 Work Program includes the following meetings:
a. Meeting #1-Review of Inventory/Assessment with City Staff
b. Meeting #2 - Review of Inventory/Assessment with Area Stakeholders
c. Meeting #3 - Review of the Framework Plan and the Recommended
Modification/Enhancement Concepts with City Staff
d. Meeting #4 -Review of the Framework Plan and the Recommended
Modification/Enhancement Concepts with Area Stakeholders
e. Meeting #5 -Presentation of final recommendations to City Staff, City
Officials, and/or Area Stakeholders.
PHASE 2: DESIGN OF RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Phase 2 of this study will consist of detailed design development and preparation
of implementation documents for the recommended improvements. Specific tasks
for Phase 2 shall be established at the conclusion of Phase 1.
FEE SCHEDULE
Compensation for services provided shall be on an hourly basis according to the
hourly wages multiplied by a factor of 3.0
•
Bruce Palmborg
March 27, 1996
Page 4
Additional meetings, over and above the ones identified in the Work Program,
.shall be $400 per meeting.
PHASE 1: FRAMEWORK PLAN AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Task Task Name Hours - Amount
Task 1 Inventory/Assessment 12 $1,260
Task 2 Framework Plan and Improvement
Concepts 16 1,680
Task 3 Recommended Framework Plan and
Improvements 12 1,260
Task 4 Meetings (5 Meetings) 15 1,575
Expenses 200
Total 55 $5,975
PHASE 2: DESIGN OF RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Fees for the Design of the Recommended Improvements will be established at the
time Phase 1 is completed and the Phase 2 work can be more closely defined.
We hope this provides the information, regarding the scope of work. and fees, that
you were looking for. As soon as you have reviewed this proposal and approved
it, we will prepare a final contract. If you have any questions, or would like
further information, please call me.
Sincerely,
BRW, INC.
Arijs Pakalns, AIA, AICP
Vice President
neceNaffi.L7R
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. is
Agenda April 15, 1996
Issue Statement:
Authorization to retain Maxfield Research Group to provide senior housing needs
analysis to include short term and long term housing strategies.
Background:
Staff has received and evaluated proposals from three consultants to evaluate
Richfield's elderly housing needs. Each provides:
• site analysis to assist the HRA independently evaluating recent elderly cooperative
housing proposals.
• population trends and demographic characteristics.
• market trends matched with the present supply of elderly housing options in the
Richfield market area.
• an assessment of the continuum of care options and services for frail elderly.
• interviews with key informants that can respond to projected service needs.
• projections of the future housing options that will best serve Richfield's elderly
population aged 55, 65 and over.
Of the proposals received Maxfield Research Group has submitted a proposal which
best fits the above listed objectives. The cost for providing the research, strategy, and
consulting is $10,000.
Recommended Motion:
Authorize the Executive Director to enter into an agreement with Maxfield Research
Group to provide an elderly housing needs analysis.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Gathering accurate information regarding senior housing needs will help the City
attract appropriately sized and designed senior housing.
2. Elderly housing needs assessment is a specialized field requiring consulting
services.
3. Maxfield Research Group has conducted approximately 160 studies for all types
of senior housing projects since 1983. Recent studies make them very familiar
with the south suburban market place. (Other proposals were received from
Senior Innovations and Advantage Marketing .Group.)
4. Each consultant's proposal indicated a $10,000 cost range. Maxfield's knowledge
f"~ of the subject and a check of references from-other elderly study recipients
'~ supports the recommendation.
5. Maxfield can respond within a 60 day time frame desired by the HRA.
6. Funds are available to provide #or the professional. services.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Modify the scope of services.
2. Select another consultant.
3. Defer a decision on a consultant.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Tom Melchior, Maxfield Research Group's Executive Director, will be at the HRA
meeting to respond to any questions.
Respectf y submitted,
Jame .Prosser
Executive Director
JDP:cak
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. ~~
Agenda April 15, 1996
Issue Statement:
Public hearing and authorization of the sale of the New Home Program property at
6320 Oliver Avenue to Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity (Habitat).
Background:
In October 1995, the HRA authorized the acquisition of property at 6320 Oliver Avenue
with CDBG funds. It is proposed that the HRA sell the property to Habitat as the
builder, in accordance with a development agreement. The development agreement
has been prepared and is similar in form and content to the one used for the previous
Habitat developments.
The following items are the points of departure from a typical HRA development
agreement:
• A minimum value is not required. It is anticipated that the 1,400 square feet, three
bedroom, 1-1/2 story home will have a property value upon completion of
approximately $85,000. A copy of the proposed plan is attached.
• The sale price of the property from the HRA to Habitat is $1. The development
agreement will be recorded and requires Habitat to pay $20,000 for the site if they
fail to perform. A Certificate of Completion would release this lien.
• Habitat will require the buyer to execute a $20,000 second mortgage to the HRA to
secure the land value.
• The HRA will assume responsibility for demolition of the existing house. The garage
is structurally sound and will be rehabilitated by Habitat.
• Habitat will make every effort to repurchase the home from the future buyer, should
they need to sell, by satisfying the buyer's accumulated equity interest. The home
would then be resold to another qualifying low income family.
• Habitat will be provided 12 months to complete the project rather than the 5 months
builders typically receive. Habitat has typically completed the home in five to six
months. The additional time is provided to reflect the voluntary nature of the
construction process.
Habitat Executive Director Stephen Seidel is anticipated to be at the April HRA meeting
to answer any questions the HRA may have.
To date, several churches have volunteered. labor including Hope Presbyterian Church
of Richfield. A neighborhood meeting was held on April 11 at United .Methodist Church
of Peace, 6345 Xerxes Avenue. The results of that meeting will be available at the
Board meeting.
Recommended Motion:
Following a public hearing, adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the.Chair
and Executive Director to execute agreements and se116320 Oliver Avenue to Habitat
for the development of a new single family home.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. Habitat has proven to be an experienced, capable, financially secure builder.
2. They have successfully completed houses in Richfield.
3. The HRA has authorized acquisition of 6320 Oliver Avenue for the New Home
Program.
4. The terms of the development agreement have been negotiated and are in
conformance with program guidelines as noted.
5. .Notice of public hearing was published in the Sun Current on April 3, 1996 for an
April 15, 1996 hearing.
Alternative Recommendation:
Do not proceed with a development agreement with Habitat and direct staff to find other
buyers.
Discussion/Decision Mode:
Closing would occur in late April with construction starting by May 1, 1996. The site
clearance work should be competed by April 30, 1996.
Respectfully submitted,
Jam .Prosser
Exe u ' e Director
JDP:ds
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6320 OLIVER AVENUE
TO TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota (HRA) desires to develop certain real property pursuant to and in
furtherance of the New Home Program adopted by the HRA, said real property being
described as follows:
6320 Oliver Avenue
Lot 7, Block 12, Ray's Lynnhurst Addition.
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized to sell real property within its area of operation
after public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a builder, Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity, has been identified as .the
purchaser of the described property, in accordance with a development agreement; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held after proper public notice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Richfield Housing and
Redevelopment Authority:
1. A public hearing has been held and 6320 Oliver Avenue is authorized to be sold to Twin
Cities Habitat for Humanity in accordance with a development agreement with the HRA.
2. The sale price to Habitat for 6320 Oliver Avenue is $1.
3. That the HRA accept a $20,000 second mortgage lien executed by the buyer from
Habitat.
4. That the Chairperson and Executive Director are authorized to execute the Development
Agreement and other agreements as required to effectuate the sale to Twin Cities
Habitat for Humanity.
Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Richfield, Minnesota this 15th day of April 1996.
Thomas E. Harms, Chair
ATTEST:
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
z
0
a
W
J
W
a
t~
z
O.
a
J
W
oC
Q
W
Z W
O ~
z
W
a ~
~ a
W W
N ~
z J
O ~
~~ o
Y. N
tai
m
z
0
..
a
~W
:J
W
N
W
J
•
„ ~ .... -
. ^ ,
t
. c e I ~,O
•I._.
:. ~ '.
i~~-Ili Z_ ~~
5~-8~ ~ L'o . ~~'S°
/~
BEDROJM
7~~
DINING,
~o
- ~ a
N J
j ~ }
~~a~ z
i 2L S ~cu. ~
j z~ 3..6.._
BAT N "
/~ ~
.~ ,~ . O a ; Z° ~
z
-, o
~~ s
I _ ~ a ..
~ ~
~ o ;3ED~M ~2 4 0 '
'o i ~ ~
3624DH (T'R) ~ i
S'-~~~
LOWER LEVEL
l.1
KITGH~ N 8~
J
R`( FRS ~ .
__ ~_ _-~.
~t.ITQY
LIVING 200M
~~,~~
.Q
N
6Lp~
^.
er~•
,•-.
:F.
j,L
t'
.•'.. ~
~,~
.~+w~+-~
j:i
•: I
~.. ~
L ~~
~ ~'`.
~'.
ter,!
_~
Y
UPPER LEVEL
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HRA Letter No. i6
Agenda April 15, 1996
issue Statement:
Public hearing on sale of the "Cloverleaf' property to Meridian Properties Real Estate
Development L.L.C., d/b/a TOLD Development Company.
Background:
On September 18, 1995 the HRA approved a Contract For Private Development with
TOLD. The contract and subsequent amendment provide for the construction of two
office towers and associated parking structures. (A 6-8 story structure and arr 8-10
story structure.) The site contains approximately 9.5 acres. Under terms of the contract
TOLD has agreed to pay $1.1 million or approximately $2.66/s.f. The proceeds will be
allocated between the Phase I & tt parcels. Proceeds for Phase II will be escrowed.
Phase II proceeds and interest will be released to the HRA upon commencement of
Phase II construction. Phase II construction must begin by November, 1998 or one
year following completion of Phase L
Recommended Motion:
Adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the sale of the Phase I and II parcels to
Meridian Properties Real Estate Development L.L.C.
Basis of Recommendation:
1. The approved contract calls for the sale of this property to Meridian Properties.
2. The legal notice of this hearing was published April 3, 1996.
3. The HRA paid approximately $1..88 per square foot upon purchase of the property
from the RTC in 1992.
Alternative Recommendation:
1. Delay action.
2. Propose to modify terms.
Discussion/Decision. Mode:
Action on April 15, 1996 is appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
Jame .Prosser
Execu ive Director
JDP:cak
HRA RESOLUTION NO.
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT
NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF 1-35W AND I-494
WHEREAS, on May 15, 1995, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and
for the City of Richfield, Minnesota (the "HRA") was presented with a concept proposal
for the redevelopment of Meridian Crossings an office center (the "Project") in the
Interstate-Lyndale-Nicollet (the "ILN") Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area".)
by Meridian Properties Real Estate Development L.L.C., d/b/a TOLD Development
Company of Maple Grove, Minnesota (the "Developer"); and
WHEREAS, the HRA and City Council approved the ILN Redevelopment Plan
and Tax Increment Financing Plan in November, 1985, (the "Plans") and have made
subsequent modifications; and
WHEREAS, the Plans call for the HRA to assist the Developer through the
. redevelopment process; and
WHEREAS, the HRA is authorized to sell real property within. its area of
operation after public hearing; and
WHEREAS, said real property (the "Property") to be sold to the Developer is
described in Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing has been held after proper public notice; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found the disposition of the property
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, a contract For Private Redevelopment between the HRA and the
Developer has been approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Richfield Housing and
Redevelopment Authority:
1. A public hearing has been held on the sale of the real property described in
Attachment A.
2. That the Chairperson and Executive Director are authorized to execute any
and all agreements required to effectuate this resolution.
3. That the contract For Private Redevelopment contains terms and conditions
of the sale.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 15th day of
April, 1996.
Thomas E. Harms, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Vern Luettinger, Secretary
.~
•
ATTAC~'r A
(page 1 of S)
. PHASE I MERIDIAN CROSSINGS
METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
To be known as Lot 3, Block 3, Cloverleaf Addition, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
That part of
The East Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter;
The West Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter;
The North 225.00 feet of the South 310.00 feet of the West Half of the East Half
of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter;
Except that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter described as
commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds East along the north line. of -
said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 347.71 feet; thence
South 00 degrees 09 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 259.80 feet; thence North
• 89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 31.00 feet to the. beginning of
the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East a
distance of 39.81 feet;. thence North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West a
distance of 28.23 feet; thence northeasterly a distance of 114.12 feet along a tangential
curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 114.00 feet and a central angle of 57
degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East
a distance of 41.80 feet; thence North 08 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds West a
distance of 15.21 feet; thence northerly a distance of 29.35 feet along a tangential
curve concave to the east having a radius of 114.23 feet and a central angle of 14
degrees 43 minutes 12 seconds; thence North 06 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds East
a distance of 27.54 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 148.71 feet along anon-
tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 511.33 feet, a central
angle of 16 degrees 39 minutes 47 seconds and chord bearing of South 68 degrees 04'
minutes 48 seconds east;. thence South 44 degrees 33 minutes 55 seconds West a
distance of 48.69 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 96.12 feet along a non-
tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 114.00 feet, a central
angle of 48 degrees 18 minutes 26 seconds and a chord bearing of South 18 degrees
47 minutes 01 seconds East; thence South 72 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds East a
distance of 144.10 feet; thence South 17 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds West a
distance of 112.00 feet; thence North 72 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West a
distance of 263.91 feet; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 5 seconds West a
distance of 118.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 58 seconds East a
distance of 52.00 feet to the point of beginning.
(page 2 of 5)
The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter and the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter. of the Southeast Quarter EXCEPT that part taken by the State of Minnesota for
Highway purposes;
All in Section 33, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
•
•
(page 3 of 5)
PHASE II MERIDIAN CROSSINGS
METES AND BOUNDS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
To be known as Lot 2, Block 3, Cloverleaf Addition, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
That part of
The East Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter;
The West Half of the Northeast Quarter of the .Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter;
The North 225.00 feet of the South 310.00 feet of the West Half of the East Half
of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter;
Except that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter described as
commencing at the Northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds East along the north line of
said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 347.71 feet; thence
South 00 degrees 09 minutes 58 seconds West a distance of 259.80 feet; thence North
89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East a distance of 31.00. feet to the beginning of
the land to be described; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East a
distance of 39.81 feet; thence North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West a
distance of 28.23 feet; thence northeasterly a distance of 114.12 feet along a tangential
curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 114.00 feet and a central angle of 57
degrees 21 minutes 23 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds East
a distance of 41.80 feet; thence North 08 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds West a
distance of 15.21 feet; thence northerly a distance of 29.35 feet along a tangential
curve concave to the east having a radius of 114.23 feet and a central angle of 14
degrees 43 minutes 12 seconds; thence North 06 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds East
a distance of 27.54 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 148.71 feet along anon-
tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 511.33 feet, a central
angle of 16 degrees 39 minutes 47 seconds and chord bearing of South 68 degrees 04
minutes 48 seconds east; thence South 44 degrees 33 minutes 55 seconds West a
distance of 48.69 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 96.12 feet along anon-
tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 114.00 feet, a central
angle of 48 degrees 18 minutes 26 seconds and a chord bearing of South 18 degrees
47 minutes 01 seconds East; thence South 72 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds East a
distance of 144.10 feet; thence South 17 degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds West a
distance of 112.00 feet; thence North 72 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West a
distance of 263.91 feet; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 5 seconds West a
distance of 118.93 feet; thence North 00 degrees 09 minutes 58 seconds East a
distance of 52.00 feet to the point of beginning.
gage 4 of 5)
• The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter and the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter EXCEPT that part taken by the State of Minnesota for
Highway purposes; .
All in Section 33, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
•
•
w .., ; . , ; ,.._.. , .. w ~ ~ ~ ~ (Page 5 of 5)
t ____-- N89°57'53"E w 657.43 •---_______ w
11 --_"~_ 350.85 -------- _ `%'- 136."0 -- 154.E -' - _
~`~~ sir 5S.7 i ~ '``--• -, '~* •. •,i~=.:::.: c,a , `, ~ y~7 52~1j 1 -- _._
7.~ s.,°E "~ ~ 1 76TH ~ S i r`~Ec? :~~ ss°S9'o1 2g~ss~, G~ ~ c';. .'ti ~y3~~1,° ~~OZO; c i ~ ~: _L_
1 9 .. ,~ C4. ° ~ ,
, r6, Lg~4L~ ,c ~ ,~ O°' co4~ ti.' v' ~ 3C
f ~ •, Z
1 30 5011 ~ J ~ y ~\~,25 2 ~`S~ ~ 4\~' _ ~ ~ ~0,~ •': i v'
~, t ~n .. ~,, ~ GG .. ~°:.~' 6 ~J i w f F .
~ N j ~ \ \.YS UJ' ; ~ CTi U1
4N 14q. 2"ps,._ ~ .~ ~ `,
Z :C1 fo N89°57'55"E • 10 ..~yA ~ `rp i~,,• 30 ~ ~~ ,
., _ ~ a, iG i;s.9~ o ~ y, o .~~ 1 ~
o ~ \ ~ o~~\
~~ -- Ri ~ ~~ q --
. ~,
.__ ~ N \\
~ r ~ 'l, :~Fyr.
H4 t ~\~
`~ iA n,omw y
~' Z
m !N ~ - ,- GDO (f
t „ t~ C ~O :. '~~i
1 ~ ~ ~ eii J'~,D^ O LO ° ~4oC ° o ~ o E F ~`
t. ~ f E v~~~i p~.O~OCO` ~1 w ~ - ` '~~
,_ ~,a
.. ti~ ° _ _....
f i` .. .................__, _ ~4. _ . _.
' ,f 1 ~~ ~ v, w , c
i
i d , ~ ~ ~~~ w 30
i , ~ i i
\ Ii ~ I
1 i i i i ~w EEEE~ 30 i~
~ 50 1 , ~ i
~~°
~ \ 6j 9~
~ Q~ ~„
~ ~
~• Q4''~~
~ ~
~ `
-
• ~~0~ _
T
" . s4 'SCE`
d°
~~ , s .
`r "9
F SO c
- ~ ~~ S ,~', tin~O
T j .'
_ ~ ,'
~~ - v/
~,~ J )? qq
~~03 `>~b ~ ~3
.. ~\ sp ~/~ ~,
~ 2q, -G
<'n ,.
w
al
f Z i
~ 4 O f
1
r ~ O 1
t
~ ~ v: 4
.~ ~~
~ ~;
E
,~ : ~~
~E;~I
.:~;
•-- ~I
I
~;
E
c~ ~
~~ ,
( / '
~/ '
,~ ~`